Reliquiae Spelmannianae. THE POSTHUMOUS WORKS OF Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. Relating to the LAWS and ANTIQUITIES OF ENGLAND. Published from the ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. With the LIFE of the AUTHOR. Sine dubio, domus Jurisconsulti est totius oraculum Civitatis. Cicero. OXFORD, Printed at the THEATER for Awnsham and John Churchill at the Black-Swan in Pater-Noster-Row, LONDON. 1698. Imprimatur, JOH. MEARE VICECAN. OXON. Jan. 17. 1698. TO THE Most Reverend Father in God THOMAS LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, PRIMATE of All ENGLAND And METROPOLITAN, And one of his Majesty's most Honourable Privy Council. MY LORD, I BEG leave to lay before your Grace these Posthumous Discourses of Sir Henry Spelman; promising them a favourable reception, both for their own worth, and for the sake of their Author. He was a Person endowed with those excellent Qualities, which never fail to recommend others to your Grace's good opinion and esteem: A Gentleman of great Learning, and a hearty Promoter and Encourager of it: In his Temper Calm and Sedate; and in his Writings, Grave and Inoffensive: a true lover of the Established Church, and a zealous maintainer of her Rights and Privileges. In which respect, the Clergy of this Nation were more particularly engaged to Him; because being a Layman, and so not liable to the suspicion of Prejudice or Interest, his Reasonings carried in them a greater weight and authority, than if they had come from one of their own Order. I might add, as some sort of excuse for this Trouble, that He had the honour to be particularly respected by two of your Grace's Predecessors; and some of his Posthumous Works, by a third. Archbishop Abbot and his immediate Successor were the chief Encouragers of the First Volume of his Councils: and after his death, the Second Part of his Glossary was published by the procurement of Archbishop Sheldon. So that these Papers have a kind of hereditary right to your Grace's Protection. All the share that I have in this Work, is the handing it into the World: and to make the first Present to your Grace, would be no more than a decent regard to the Eminence of your Station; though I had no particular obligation to do it. But in my Circumstances, I should think myself very ungrateful, if enjoying so much Happiness under your Grace's Patronage, I should omit any opportunity of expressing my Thankfulness for it. Especially, since such small Acknowledgements as this, are the only Returns that I can ever hope to make for the Encouragement, which You daily afford to Your GRACE'S most obliged and most dutiful Servant EDMUND GIBSON. THE PREFACE. I Shall not make any Apology for the publication of these Treatises: They seemed to me to be very useful towards a right understanding of the Laws and Antiquities of England; and I hope they will appear so to others too. Nor need I endeavour to recommend them to the world, any otherwise than by showing them to be the genuine Labours of Sir H. Spelman, whose Learning, Accuracy, and Integrity are sufficiently known. The first of them, concerning Feuds and Tenors in England, was written in the Year 1639. and is printed from a fair Copy in the Bodleian Library, corrected with Sir Henry Spelman's own hand. The Occasion of writing it, was the Great Case of Defective Titles in Ireland; as may be gathered in some measure from the hints, that our Author has given us; but is much more evident from the Case itself, printed afterwards by order of Thomas Viscount Wentworth the then Lord deputy. The Grounds thereof (with the Plead and Resolutions, so far as they concern the Original of Tenors) were, in short, thus: The several Manors and Estates within the Counties of Roscomon, Sligo, Mayo and galway, in the Kingdom of Ireland, being unsettl d as to their Titles; King James I. by Commission under the Great Seal dated the 2d. day of March in the 4th. Year of his Reign, did authorise certain Commissioners, by Letters Patents to make Grants of the said Lands and Manors to the respective Owners. Whereupon, several Letters Patents to that effect, passed under his Majesty's Great Seal, by virtue of the said Commission, for the strengthening of Titles that might otherwise seem defective. And afterwards, in the Reign of King Charles I. upon an Enquirie into his majesty's Title to the County of Mayo, there was an Act of State published, commanding all those who held any Lands in that County by Letters Patents from the Crown, to produce them or the enrolment thereof before the Lord deputy and Council, by a certain day. To the end that they might be secured in the quiet possession of their Estates, in case the said Letters were allowed by that Board to be good and effectual in Law. In pursuance of this Order, several Letters Patents were produced, and particularly the Lord Viscount Dillon's; which last, upon the perusal and consideration thereof by his majesty's Council, were thought to be void in Law. And therefore it was ordered by the Lord deputy and Council, that the doubt arising upon the Letters Patents should be drawn up into a Case, and that Case to be openly argued at the Council-Board. The Case was drawn up in these words: King James by Commission under the Great Seal dated the second day of March in the fourth year of his Reign, did authorise certain Commissioners to grant the Manor of Dale, by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of this Kingdom, to A. and his heirs, and there is no direction given in the said Commission touching the Tenure to be reserved.— There are Letters Patents by colour of the said Commission passed unto A. and his heirs, to hold by Knights▪ Service, as of his Majesty's Castle of Dublin. Here, it was agreed on all hands▪ that the Letters Patents were void as to the Tenure, and that the Commissioners had acted beyond their Commission in reserving a mean Tenure, to the prejudice of the King; when they ought either to have reserved an express Tenure by Knight's Service in Capite, or have mentioned no Tenure at all, but have left the Law to imply a Tenure in Capite. The question therefore was, Whether the deficiency of the Tenure did so far affect the Grant, as wholly to destroy the Letters Patents? Or, Whether the Letters Patents might not be good as to the Land, and void only as to the Tenure? The Case was argued several days by Counsel on both sides; and was afterwards delivered up to the Judges, who were required by the Lord deputy and Council, to consider of it and to return their Resolution. But upon private Conference, not agreeing in their Opinions, it was thought necessary for public satisfaction to have it argued solemnly by them all: which was accordingly done. And when it came to be debated, whether the reservation of a Tenure, so different from that intended and warranted by the Commission, could make void the whole Grant; this happened to lead them to a more general Enquirie, What the reservation of a Tenure is to the Grant? whether it be a part of the Grant, and the modus concessionis, or whether it be a distinct thing, and Aliud from the Grant? For (so the Printed Case represents their Opinion) if the Reservation of the Tenure and the Grant of the Land, be aliud & aliud, two distinct things, in the consideration of the whole Grant made, and the authority given by the said Commission for the making thereof; then the Patent may be void as to the Tenure, and yet good for the Grant of the Land. But if the Reservation of the Tenure be incident unto the authority and included within it, and the Reservation of the Tenure and the Grant of the Land make up but one entire Grant, so that the one is a part of the other, and the Reservation of the Tenure be Modus concessionis; then the granting of the Land, reserving a divers or contrary Tenure to that which their [nude] authority did warrant them to reserve, is a doing of Idem alio modo, and so the whole Act is void. They who pleaded for the validity of the Letters Patents as to the Lands, and their being void only as to the Tenure; urged, among other arguments, That Tenors in Capite were brought into England by the Conquest, but Grants were by the Common-Law; and therefore Grants being more ancient than Tenors, the Tenure must of necessity be aliud from the thing granted. And to prove that this Tenure came in with the Conqueror, they cited Mr. Selden in his Spicileg▪ ad Eadmerum, p. 194. where he hath that out of Bracton de Acquir. Rerum Dominio. b. 2. Forinsecum servitium dicitur Regale servitium quia spectat ad Dominum Regem & non ad alium, & secundum quod in Conquestu fuit adinventum. But this Argument and the Authority were both over-ruld; and it was affirmed, that Tenors were not brought into England by the Conqueror, but were common among the Saxons. Their Answer to Mr. Selden's Opinion, with the Reasons upon which they grounded their position, I will transcribe at large from the Printed Case; the Book being very scarce, and this the only Point wherein Sir Henry Spelman is concerned. It was answered that Mr. Selden in that place does barely recite the words of Bracton, not delivering any Opinion of his own. For in that Book cited, pag. 170. and in his Titles of Honour, the last Edition. p. 612. We find that he was of another Opinion, and that this Tenure was in use in England in the times of the Saxons. What were those Thani Majores, or Thani Regis among the Saxons? but the King's immediate Tenants of Lands, which they held by personal service, as of the King's person by Grand Serjeanty, or Knights-service in Capite. The Land so held, was in those times called Thainland, as Land holden in Socage was called Reveland, so frequently in Doomsday: Haec terra fuit terra Regis Edwardi Thainland, sed postea conversa est in Reveland. Coke Instit. Sect. 117. After some years that followed the coming of the Normans, the title of Thane grew out of use, and that of Baron and Barony succeeded for Thane and Thainland. Whereby we may understand the true and original Reason, of that which we have in the Lord Cromwel's Case, 2. Coke 81. That every Barony of ancient time was held by Grand Serjeanty; by that Tenure were the Thain-lands held in the time of the Saxons, and those Thain-lands were the same that were after called Baronies. 'Tis true, the Possessions of Bishops and Abbots were first made subject to Knights-service in Capite by William the Conqueror, in the fourth year of his Reign, for their Lands were held in the times of the Saxons: in pura & perpetua Eleemosyna, free, ab omni servitio saeculari. But he than turned their Possessions into Baronies, and so made them Barons of the Kingdom by Tenure, so that as to them, this Tenure and Service may be said to be in Conquestu adinventum. But the Thain-lands were held by that Tenure before. As the King's Thane was a Tenant in Capite, so the Thanus mediocris or middle Thane, was only a Tenant by Knights-service, that either held of a mean Lord and not immediately of the King, or at the least of the King as of an Honour or Manor, and not in Capite. What was that Trinoda Necessitas, which so often occurs in the Grant of the Saxon Kings, under this Form. Exceptisistis tribus Expeditione, Arcis & pontis exstructione? (See it in a Charter of King Etbeldred in the Preface to Coke 6. Report, etc.) But that which was after expressed by Salvo forinseco: Bracton lib. 2. cap. 26. & 35. 12. Edw. 1. Guard 152. 26. Ass. 66. Selden Analect. Anglobrit. 78. And therefore it was said that Sir Henry Spelman was mistaken, who in his Glossary verbo feudum, refers the original of Feuds in England to the Norman Conquest. It is most manifest, that Capite Tenors, Tenors by Knights-service, Tenors in Socage, Frank-almoigne, etc. were frequent in the times of the Saxons. And if we will believe what is cited out of an old French Customary, in a MS. Treatise of the Antiquity of Tenors in England, which is in many men's hands, all those Tenors were in use long before the Saxons, even in the times of the Britain's, there it is said▪ The first British King divided Britain into four parts, And gave one part to the Arch-flamens to pray for him and his posterity. A second part he gave to his Earls and Nobility to do him Knights-service. A third he divided among Husbandmen, to hold of him in Socage. The fourth part he gave to Mechanical persons to hold in Burgages. But that Testimony was waved, there being little certainty or truth in the British Story before the times of Caesar. Neither would they make use of that, which we are taught by William Roville of Alenzon in his Preface to the Grand Customier of Normandy, that all those Customs (among which these Tenors are) were first brought into Normandy out of England by Edward the Confessor. Besides, that which hath been said, we find Feuds both the name and thing in the Laws of those times, among the Laws of Edward the Confessor, cap. 35. where it is thus provided, Debent enim universi Liberi homines, & secundum feodum suum, & secundum tenementa sua, Arma habere, & illa semper prompta conservare, ad tuitionem Regni, & servitium dominorum suorum, etc. Lambard. Archaionom. 135. This Law was after confirmed by William the Conqueror, vid. Coke Instit. Sect. 103. As these Tenors were common in those times, so were all the fruits of them, Homage, Fealty, Escuage, Reliefs, Wardships. For Releifs, we have full testimony in the Reliefs of their Earls and Thanes, for which see the Laws of King Canutus, cap. 66, & 69. The Laws of Edward the Confessor, cap. de Heterochiis, And what out of the Book of Doomsday Coke hath in his Instit. Sect. 103. Camden in Bark-shire. Selden in Eadmer. p. 154. That Wardships were then in use, and not brought in by the Normans, as Camden in his Britt. 178. Nor by Hen. III. as Randolph Higden in his Polichronicon; and others (not understanding him) would persuade. Vid. Seldens Notes on Fortescue. 51. Among the privileges granted by Edward the Confessor to the Cinque-ports, we meet with this, that their heirs shall shall not be in Ward. Lambards' Perambulat. of Kent. 101. And in the Customs of Kent, which are in the Magna Charta of Tottels Edition, and in Lambards' Perambulation, There is a Rule for the Wardship of the heir in Gavelkind, and that he shall not be married by the Lord. And those Customs say of themselves, that they were Devant le Conquest, & en le Conquest. For the Antiquity of Wardships in England and Scotland, see also Hect. Boet. lib. 11. Buchanan rerum Scot lib. 6. and the Laws of Malcolm II. which prove the Antiquity of Wardships in Scotland, and therefore in England before the Norman Conquest; for in those times it is probable the Laws of both Nations did not much differ, as for the times after, it appears they did not, by comparing their Regiam Majestatem, and our Glanvil. Neither is the bare conjecture of Sir Henry Spelman sufficient, to take away the force of those Laws. Vid. Spelman. Glossar. verbo Feudum. Upon this (amongst other reasons) they did conclude, That upon consideration of the Authority given, and Grant thereupon made, the reservation of the Tenure cannot be said to be Aliud. So. a separate and distinct thing from the Authority of Granting the Land, but rather included within it. And that the Reservation of the Tenure, though it be not Ipsa concessio, the Grant itself, yet it is Modus concessionis, and a part of the Grant; and that therefore the Authority being not pursued in that, the whole Grant is void. These were their Arguments for Tenors among the Saxons; as they are set down in the Case itself, drawn up and Printed by Order of the Lord deputy. Sir Henry Spelman has severally considered both the Truth and Force of them; not strictly confining himself to their Reasons and Reflections, but taking occasion from thence to write a very elaborate Treatise of the Nature and Original of Feuds and Tenors. The two discourses, Of the ancient Government of England, and Of Parliaments, are both of them published from the Original Manuscripts in the hands of Mr. Charles Spelman of Congham in Norfolk, son of Sir John Spelman, and Grandson to Sir Henry. That, concerning the Original of the four Terms, was published in the Year 1684. from a very uncorrect and imperfect Copy, which probably had been taken, when the Author first wrote the Discourse. The Original Manuscript (with very many Additions and Corrections, that Sir Henry afterwards made in it) is preserved in the Bodleian Library; from whence the Work is now printed entire. The Apology for Archbishop Abbot, by an unknown Author, and the Answer to it by Sir Henry Spelman; are in the possession of Mr. Henry Spelman (son to Mr. Clement Spelman, who was Sir Henry's youngest son) both written with our Author's own hand. To this Answer he refers us in his Glossary▪ under the title Muta Canum. The Letters relating to the same subject, are in a Collection of Original Papers and Records, delivered to Mr. Wharton by Archbishop Sancroft, and now in the hands of Mr. Ch●●wel. The Treatise of the Original of Testaments and Wills, and his Icenia, or the description of Norfolk▪ are both published from the Author's own Copies, in the Bodleian Library. The latter of these is not so complete, as he had intended to make it. The Catalogue of the Earls Marshal of England, and the Dissertation de Milite, were evidently designed for a part of his Glossary; as appears from the manner of the Composition, and from several passages in them. But when the Papers were delivered to Sir William Dugdale, for the publication of the second part of that Work, these two (it seems) had been mislaid. The account of the Earls Marshal is (I fear) imperfect in some places; but will however be of good use towards a more accurate Catalogue of them. The succession of the Family of Sharnburn, is a piece of Antiquity that was exceedingly valued by Sir Henry Spelman; as appears both from his 1 Pag. 188. Recommendation, and from the use that he has made of it in some part of his Works. Having met with a Copy in Mr. Ashmole's Museum at Oxford, I thought it might not be improper to publish it among his Remains. The Dialogue concerning the Coin of the Kingdom, and the Catalogue of the Places of the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realm; are in the possession of Mr. Charles Spelman. The first is written in a hand not unlike Sir Henry Spelman's, only somewhat less; which (if it was really his) may have been occasioned by his writing it while he was young. For it 2 Pag. 208. appears to have been composed in the 36. of Elizabeth; when Sir Henry was but about thirty three years of age. The Catalogue was drawn up 3 Pag. 212. Durham-house. in the time of King James I. for the use of the then Archbishop of Canterbury; as I gather from those words in the beginning, written in a different hand, Pro Domino Archiepiscopo Cantuar. I dare not positively affirm, that either of these is Sir Henry Spelman's; but the finding them among his other Papers, and the accurate knowledge of our English affairs which appears in both, incline me to believe that he was really the Author of them; and for that reason, they are printed upon this occasion. This is all I have to say concerning the Posthumous Works of Sir Henry Spelman; which I was willing to make public, for the Author's reputation and the service of the World. THE LIFE OF Sir Henry Spelman Kt. Birth. HENRY SPELMAN was born at Congham, a Town in Norfolk near Lynn. He was descended from an ancient Family of that name; who, about Henry the III's▪ time were seated in Hampshire, but afterwards removed into Suffolk, and from thence into Norfolk, about 200. years since. His Father's name was Henry Spelman Esq as I learn from a Pedigree of the Family under Sir Henry's own hand; and not John, as a 1 Praef. ad Gloss. Edit. 1687 by J. A. late Writer has told us. His Mother was Frances, daughter of William Sanders of Ewel in Surrey Esq. Education. After his Education at School, he was sent to Trinity College in Cambridge, before he was quite 15. years of Age, and indeed (as he 2 Praef. ad Gloss. himself complains) before he was ripe for the University. He had not stayed there two years and a half, but his Father died; and he was called home to assist his Mother in the management of the Family. Afterwards, when he came into the World, and betook himself to Writing, and the study of our Laws, he found the want of University Education; and condoles his misfortune in that particular, in a 3 Letter against Impropriations, printed among the Treatises published by Jer. Stephens, 1647. 4t● Letter to his friend Mr. Richard Carew. Contrary to a persuasion, very common now adays, That Philosophy, Oratory, Poetry, and the other Exercises which take up the first four years in our Universities, are altogether foreign to the business of Lawyers; and that the study of them is so much loss of time, to Gentlemen designed for that honourable Profession. Sent to Lincoln's Inn. After he had continued at home about a twelvemonth, he was sent to study the Law at Lincoln's-Inn; either with a design to practise it, or (which is more likely) as a necessary accomplishment of an English Gentleman. There he stayed almost three years; but was then unhappily removed, when we may imagine he began to relish the Law, and in some measure to conquer the difficulties of it. Many years after, we find him complaining of his hard Fortune, in the Preface to his Glossary: and he concludes his complaint with a character of the Common-Law, which I will here transcribe for the honour of the Profession. Excussit me interea è Clientela sua (speaking of the Law) gratiae, potestatis, dignitatis, immensaeque apud nos largitrix opulentiae: Illa (inquam) vestitu simplici & inculto, sed jurium omnium Municipalium (absit dictis invidia) nobilissima domina; omni utpote justitia, moderamine, prudentia, sublimique acumine (temere licet eam perstrinxerit Hottomannus) refertissima. Marriage He was about twenty years of Age; and retiring into the Country, married the eldest Daughter and Coheir of John Le Strange, a Gentleman of an ancient Family in Norfolk. By this match, he became Guardian to Sir Hamon Le Strange; during whose Minority, he lived at Hunstanton, (the Seat of that Family,) and was 1 2 Jac. 1 High Sheriff of Norfolk. By degrees, he begun to be taken notice of, for his great Prudence and Abilities▪ and was accordingly, three several times, sent by the Employments. King into Ireland upon public business. At home, he was appointed one of the Commissioners To inquire into the oppression of exacted Fees, in all the Courts and Offices of England, as well Ecclesiastical as Civil; which a late 2 Hacket, Life of Bishop Williams, Part 2. pag 93. Author calls A noble Examination and full of Justice. To this business he gave his constant attendance for many years together, with great integrity and application; and the Government was so sensible of his good services, that the Council procured his Majesties Writ of Privy Seal for 300l. to be presented to him; not as a full Recompense (for so they declared) but only as an occasional Remembrance, till they should have an opportunity of doing something for him, that might be a more suitable consideration for his diligence, in that and other public Affairs. This attendance made him neglect his own private business, to the great prejudice of his Family; as he himself seems to complain, in his Preface to the Glossary. And his eldest Son (Sir John Spelman) represented to the Privy Council, how much his Father's Estate had suffered by it; appealing (for a proof of his great pains therein) to the knowledge of several of their Lordships, to the Journals of that Commission, and to his papers and collections relating to the same. Knighted I cannot give any particular account, of the other public Services wherein he was employed. He was Knighted by K. James, who had a particular esteem for him, as well on account of his known capacity for business, as his great Learning in many kinds; more especially in the Laws and Antiquities of our Nation. These, for a good part of his Life, he seems to have studied for the service of his Prince, and his own diversion; but not with an eye to any particular design. Came to live in London. When he was about 50. years of Age, he resolved to draw his affairs into as narrow a compass as might be; with a full design to bestow the remainder of his time among Books and Learned Men. With this resolution he sold his Stock, let his Estate, quitted the Country, and settled in London with his wife and family. His next business was ( 1 Pref. to the Gloss. as he himself tells us) to get together all such Books and Manuscripts, as concerned the subject of Antiquities, whether foreign or domestic: For in these Inquiries he had ever had a particular delight; and now being in a good measure freed from the daily disturbances he was before exposed to, it was natural for him to fall into a study, to which his own genius had always led him. Study of our ancient Historians. It is likely, he had then a good understanding of the Laws and Customs of the Kingdom; I mean the Modern part of them, such as is commonly used in the ordinary practice of it. But such a general knowledge could not satisfy a Mind so curious, and a Judgement so solid, as his appears to have been, in all his Writings. These inclined him to search into the Reasons and Foundations of the Law, which he knew were not to be learned, but from the Customs and Histories of our Nation in all Ages; nor these Usages to be traced out, but by a strict examination of the most ancient Records and Manuscripts. And as his own inclination led him to this Enquiry; so, not troubling himself with the Practice of the Law, but content to live quietly upon his own Estate, he was perfectly at leisure to pursue it. And indeed (as the best things in this world are attended with inconveniences) it is very much to the disadvantage of the Law, that those of the Long Robe, who are best qualified to improve the knowledge of it from original Records, are so much taken up with the business of their Profession, that they have little time to bestow upon those matters. As on the other hand, Men who are born to Leasure and Estates, however inclinable they may be to the more polite parts of Learning, do seldom care to engage in a study, which at first sight seems to be so rough and tedious. Thus, the one wants Leisure, and the other Resolution; and so the Monuments of our Forefathers being neglected, we are deprived of a great deal of useful knowledge▪ that might be drawn from them. It was the happiness of Sir Henry Spelman (and much more, of the English Nation) that he had both time and inclination to do it; I mean, to examine the ancient Laws and Monuments, not only of our own, but also of most other Northern Kingdoms. Particularly, he was very well versed in the old Feudal law; and has shown us in a Discourse upon that head, how most of the Tenors here in England, have their foundation from thence. This near relation between their Customs and our Constitutions, made him 1 Law-Terms, Chap. 8 in MS. Oxon many times marvel, that my Lord Cook adorning our Law with so many flowers of Antiquity and foreign learning, should not turn aside into this field, from whence so many roots of our Law have of old been taken and transplanted. And I wish (so he goes on) some worthy Lawyer would read them diligently, and show the several heads, from whence these of ours are taken. They beyond the seas, are not only diligent, but very curious in this kind; but we are all for profit, taking what we find at market, without enquiring from whence it came. With this honest freedom does he censure his own times. Not but then (as well as now) the studies to which he directs, were pursued and encouraged by Persons of the highest Stations in the Law; and some of them were so far concerned for the improvement of ancient Learning, that they formed themselves into a Society of Antiquaries for that purpose: as we learn from Sir Henry's Introduction to his Law-terms. With this design of understanding the foundation of our Laws, Ecclesiastical as well as Civil; he read over the Fathers, Councils, and as many of the middle-age Historians as he could meet with, whether foreign or domestic, Printed or Manuscript. The roughness of style could not be very pleasing; but that which chiefly discouraged him, was the great number of strange and obsolete words; which are very hard to be understood, and yet oftentimes are so considerable, that the meaning of the whole sentence depends upon them. However, he went forward; and where he met with any such word, set it down in its proper order; with a distinct reference to the place: till by degrees he had collected a variety of instances, and by comparing the several passages where the same word occurred, was able to give a tolerable conjecture at the true signification. After he had made a considerable collection of this kind, and observed how by this means the reading of the old Historians became every day more easy and pleasant; he begun to digest his materials; and from the several quotations, to draw a judgement of the strict acceptation of each word, in the respective Ages wherein it was used. For he considered, that what had been a discouragement to him, would be so to others too; and that a work of this nature, would remove one of the greatest difficulties in the reading of our old Historians. But tho' a number of instances gave him good satisfaction, as to the several Words; yet finding that many of our Laws since the Conquest are drawn from the Constitution of the Saxons, and that many obsolete Terms in our Latin Historians must be of a pure Saxon Original; he despaired of ever accomplishing his design, for want of understanding that Language. At least, he was certain, that the knowledge of it must needs lead him to a clearer interpretation of many obscure passages, and enable him (throughout the whole Work) to deliver his Opinion with a better assurance. This Language, at that time, was not to be learned without great difficulty: Little assistance was to be expected from conversation, in a study which few People of that Age ever minded. Nor had he the directions either of Grammar or Dictionary; as we at this day are accommodated with both, very accurate in their kind. However, he set heartily about it; and tho', I think, he never perfectly conquered it; yet (under so many inconveniencies) it is a greater wonder that he should attain so good a knowledge, than that he should not make himself an absolute Master of it. Glossary. After he had made large Collections, and got tolerable knowledge of the Saxon Tongue; he resolved to go on with his undertaking: but because he would not depend altogether upon his own Judgement, he Printed a sheet or two for a Specimen, whereby his Friends might be able to give him their opinion of the design. 1 Praef. ad Gloss. He was encouraged, on all hands by the most Learned Persons of that Age; at home by Archbishop Usher, Bishop Williams then Lord Keeper, Mr. Selden, and Sir Robert Cotton; abroad, by Rigaltius, Salmasius, Piereschius, and others; as also Bignonius, Meursius, and Lindenbrogius, whose assistances he very gratefully acknowledges, in his Preface to the work. 2 Brady, Answ. to Mr. Petit, pag. 229. Upon their encouragement, he prepared part of it for the Press, and offered the whole Copy to Mr. Bill the King's Printer. He was very moderate in his demands; desiring only five pound, in consideration of his labour, and that too to be paid him in Books. But Mr. Bill absolutely refused to meddle with it; knowing it to be upon a subject out of the common road, and not likely to prove a saleable work. So that Sir Henry was forced to carry it on at his own charge; and in the year 1626. published the first part of it, to the end of the Letter L. Why he went no farther, I cannot tell; nor has he so much as hinted to the cause of it, either in his Preface, or any part of his works, that I know of. Monsieur du Fresne (who very much laments that he should not publish the second part himself) fancies that his design of compiling the English Councils, might be the occasion of his breaking off in the middle of his Glossary. But 'tis not likely, that a Person of Sir Henry Spelman's settled Temper and Resolution, should leave one work imperfect, to make way for another. I have heard it affirmed by others, that he stopped at the Letter M. because he had said somethings under Magna Charta, and Magnum Consilium, that his Friends were afraid might give offence. But I believe, the true reason was this: Printing it at his own charge, he must have laid out a considerable sum upon the first part, and having a large Family, there was no reason why he should venture as much more, without the prospect of a quicker return, than either the coldness of the Bookseller, or the nature of the work gave him. It fell out accordingly; for, eleven years after, the greatest part of the Impression remained unsold; till in 1637. two of the London Booksellers took it off his hands. And (tho' he should afterwards have had encouragement to go forward) that was not a time to speak freely, either of the King's Prerogative or the Liberties of the Subject; both which would upon many occasions fall in his way. Besides, that the finishing the second part, with the same copiousness and accuracy as he had done the first, would have been too heavy a task for a Man of his great Age. The Author has told us in an Advertisement before the book, that he chose to entitle his work Archaeologus, rather than Glossarium, as we commonly call it. For a Glossary, strictly speaking, is no more than a bare explication of Words; whereas This does more especially treat of Things, and contains entire Discourses and Dissertations upon several of the heads therein mentioned. For which reason, it is not only to be consulted upon occasion, like our common Lexicons; but aught to be carefully perused and studied, as the greatest Treasure extant, of the ancient Customs and Constitutions of England. Before the Edition of 1626. he has this remarkable Dedication: Deo, Ecclesiae, Literarum Reipub. Sub protestatione de addendo, retrahendo, corrigendo, poliendo, Prout opus fuerit & consultius videbitur; Deo clementissime annuente, HENRICUS SPELMANNUS Omni supplex humilitate D. D. I have therefore set it down at large, because in the Editions of 1664. and 1687. they have thought fit to omit it: and I would not have the good Man deprived of such a public testimony of his Modesty, and love for Truth. The second part of the Glossary. About the Year 1637. Sir William Dugdale acquainted our Author, that many Learned Men were very desirous to see the Second Part published; and requested of him to gratify the world with the Work entire. Upon that, he showed him the Second part; as also the improvements that he had made upon the First: but withal told him, what great discouragements he had met with from the Booksellers. So, for that time, the matter rested; and upon the Author's death, all the papers came into the hands of his eldest Son Sir John Spelman; a Gentleman who had sufficient parts and abilities, to complete what his Father had begun, if death had not prevented him. After the Restoration of King Charles II. Archbishop Sheldon and the Lord Chancellor Hyde, enquired of Sir William Dugdale, what became of the Second part of the Glossary, or whether it was ever finished. He told them that it was finished by the Author, and that the Copy was in the hands of Mr. Charles Spelman, Grandson to Sir Henry. They desired, that it might by all means be printed, and that he would prevail upon Mr. Spelman to do it; for the Service of the Public and the honour of his Grandfather. Whereupon, having got a good number of Subscriptions, the management of that whole affair was referred to Sir William Dugdale; as well to treat with the Booksellers, as to prepare the Copy for the Press. The share that Sir William Dugdale had, in the publication of this Second Part, has been made the ground of a suspicion, that he inserted many things of his own, that were not in Sir Henry Spelman's Copy; and particularly, some passages which tend to the enlargement of the Prerogative in opposition to the Liberties of the Subject. The objection has been raised on occasion of a 1 Mr. Petit's Jani Anglorum facies Nova, p. 219. & 265. And the answer to it, by Dr. Brady, pag. 229. Controversy, about the Antiquity of the Commons in Parliament; the Authority of Sir Henry being urged, to prove that there was no such thing as a House of Commons till the time of Henry III It is agreed on all hands, that this Learned Knight was a very competent Judge of that Controversy; that as he had thoroughly studied our Constitution, so he always writ without partiality or prejudice; that he was not engaged in a party, nor had any other design but to publish the truth fairly and honestly, as he found it asserted by the best Historians. Upon these grounds, his Opinion in matters of this nature, has ever been thought considerable; and his bare Judgement will always be valued, when we can be sure that it is his own. And there can be no doubt, but his Assertions under the Title Parlamentum (upon which the controversy is raised) are his own, and not an interpolation of Sir William Dugdale's. For the very Copy from which it was Printed, is in the Bodleian Library, in Sir Henry Spelman's own hand; and agrees exactly with the Printed Book: particularly, in the passages under dispute, they are the same, word for word. So far then as this Copy goes (for it ends at the word Riota,) it is a certain testimony, that Sir William Dugdale did no more than mark it for the Printer, and transcribe here and there a loose paper. And tho' the rest of the Copy was lost, before it came to the Oxford Library, and so we have not the same authority for the Glossarie's being genuine, after the Letter R; yet it is not likely that Sir William had any more share in the seven last Letters of the Alphabet, than he had in the others. For all the parts of such a Work must be carried on at the same time; and so, to be sure, the Author left equal materials for the whole. The Gentleman also, who is concerned to prove the Second Part to be all genuine, has urged Sir William Dugdale's own authority for it; and that too while he was living 1 Brady, pag. 229. . Then, I have seen a Letter from Sir William Dugdale to Mr. Spelman, giving him an account of the great losses he had sustained by the Fire of London, and the pains he had taken in the publication of the Councils and Glossary. As to the former, he expressly lays claim to the better half of it, as his own Work and Collection; adding, that if the Impression had not perished, in all right and reason he ought to have had consideration for the same; as also (so he goes on) for my pains in fitting the Copy of the Glossary for the Printer, by marking it for the difference of Letter, and introducing and transcribing those loose papers left by your Grandfather, without fit directions where they should come in. This is all that he pretends to, in the Glossary; and if he had any further share in it, 'tis likely he would have insisted upon it, on this occasion; to convince Mr. Spelman the more effectually of the good services he had done him in that business. I have been the more particular in this matter, because if it should appear in the main, that Sir William had taken the liberty of adding or altering; every single passage after would be liable to suspicion, and the authority of the whole very much weakened. For tho' that worthy Person was extremely well versed in our English affairs; yet it must be owned, that Sir Henry Spelman was a better judge of our ancient Customs and Constitutions; and consequently, whatever he delivers as his opinion, aught to be allowed a proportionable authority. Had he put his last hand to this Second Part, the Glossary (as it is now printed together) would have made a much nobler Work. But the latter part, in comparison of the other, is jejune and scanty; and every one must see, that it is little more than a collection of Materials, out of which he intended to compose such Discourses, as he has all along given us in the First Part, under the words that are most remarkable. It was my good fortune, among others of his papers, to meet with two of these Dissertations, De Marescallis Angliae and De Milite; which are published among these Remains for the present, and will be of use hereafter, in a new Edition of the Glossary; as properly belonging to it, and originally designed for it by the Author. Councils. Tho' it is not likely that he should lay aside his Glossary, for the sake of the Councils; yet it is certain, that he entered upon this latter Work, before the Glossary was finished 1 Praef. ad Concil. Vol. I. . He was particularly encouraged in it, by Dr. George Abbot and Dr. William Laud, successively Archbishops of Canterbury; and above all, by the most Learned Primate of Armagh, Archbishop Usher. And in his Preface, he tells us that he was much confirmed in his design, by what he had heard from Dr. Wren, first, Bishop of Norwich, and afterwards of Ely. He told him, how Dr. Andrews (the then late Bishop of Winchester) had been reflecting with great concern, upon the diligence of the Germans, French, Italians, and other Nations, in publishing the Histories and Decrees of their respective Synods; whilst the English (who had a greater plenty of Evidences both in Ecclesiastical and Civil affairs, than any of their Neighbours) had never so much as attempted such a public Service to their Church, Upon that occasion, the good Bishop desired Dr. Wren, that for the credit of the Kingdom and the honour of Religion, he would think of such an Undertaking; and lest it should prove too tedious for any single hand, that he would draw to his assistance a convenient number of Men, of sufficient Learning and Judgement for a Work of that nature. Upon this request, he promised to consider of it; and had proceeded, but that the Bishop excused him, upon an assurance, that Sir Henry Spelman was engaged in the same design. Sir Henry having been told this passage by the Bishop of Norwich, with great modesty expressed his concern, for taking the Work out of much abler hands. But since it had happened so, he did not any longer look upon it as a matter of choice, whether or no he should go forward; but thought he was bound in justice to make the best satisfaction he was able, for depriving the Church of the joint labours of so many Learned Men. He branched his Undertaking into three parts; assigning an entire Volume to each Division: 1. From the first Plantation of Christianity, to the coming in of the Conqueror, in 1066. 2d. From the Norman Conquest, till the casting off the Pope's Supremacy, and the dissolution of Monasteries by King Henry VIII. 3d. The History of the Reformed English Church, from Henry VIII. to his own time. 〈…〉 Councils. The Volume containing the First of these Heads, was published in the Year 1639. (about two years before his death) with his own Annotations upon the more difficult places. He confesses, that it would have been impossible for him to finish it, without the assistance of his own son and Mr. Jerem. Stephens. Of the former of these we have occasion to speak more at large, among Sir Henry's children: and also of the latter, upon occasion of some papers, that he left at his death, to the care of that Learned Gentleman. Only, it may be proper to observe in this place, that Archbishop Laud procured for him a Prebend in the Church of Lincoln, for his assisting in the publication of the First Volume of the Councils. And Sir Henry does, in effect, recommend to him the preparing the Second and Third; as a person every way qualified to complete the Design. The Author honestly tells us 1 〈…〉 Council. , (that in such a confusion of thoughts and papers) he had omitted the accounts of some Synods, which he had ready by him: that he had received Observations from many Learned persons, after the Press was gone too far to have them inserted: and that particularly the Learned Primate of Armagh had communicated his Animadversions upon the whole Volume. I have seen, among his own papers, the Remarks of Salmasius and De Laet; but where the rest are to be met with, I cannot tell. Out of these, the Corrections and Additions that he himself had made, he resolved to publish an Appendix to the Tome, but I suppose was prevented by death. However, to incline the Reader to a favourable interpretation of the omissions or imperfections of his Work; he desires him to consider that most of his Materials were to be fetched from Manuscripts; whereof indeed there were very great numbers, both in the Universities and other parts of the Kingdom▪ but being neglected by the generality of Scholars, they lay in confusion and were in a great measure useless, to his or any other Design. At that time, this was a just and proper Apology; but our Age is much more curious in those matters. Witness that noble Catalogue of Manuscripts which we daily expect from the Oxford Press, and a Volume of the same kind intended by the University of Cambridge. The second Volume of the Councils. The Second Volume of the Councils (at the same time with the second part of the Glossary) was put into the hands of Sir William Dugdale, by the direction of Archbishop Sheldon and Chancellor Hyde. He made considerable Additions to it out of the Archbishop's Registers and the Cottonian Library; so that he affirms in a Letter to Mr. Spelman, Grandson to Sir Henry, That of the 200. sheets in that Book, not above 57 were of his Grandfather's collecting. And it appears from the Original in the Bodleian Library, under the hands of Sir Henry Spelman and Sir William Dugdale; that the former had left little more towards the second Volume, than hints and references where the Councils were to be met with. It was published in the Year 1664. but with abundance of faults, occasioned by the negligence either of the Copier or Corrector, or both. 1 Life of Mr. Somner. Mr. Somner, sensible of this, took great pains in collecting the printed Copy with many of the Original Records; correcting the Errors in the margin of his own book. This is now in the Library of the Church of Canterbury, and will be a good help towards a more accurate Edition; 2 Mr. Nicolsons English Library, part 2. pag. 43. as well as those collections of Mr. Junius, in the possession of Mr. Jones of Sunningwell. The truth is, we very much want a new Edition; the greatest part of the Impression having been burnt in the Fire of London; so that the Book is hardly to be met with, and (uncorrect as it is) has ever since boar an immoderate price. I know no Work that would be a greater service to our Church, than an entire History of all the Councils before the Reformation,▪ for the account of 'em which we have already, is far from being entire▪ with the Addition of a Third Volume, to contain the Public Affairs of our Reformed Church. (It is probable, that towards this last part, some assistance may be had from that 1 〈…〉 As●mol Oxon Manuscript of Sir William Dugdale's, entitled Papers to be made use of for a Third Volume of the Councils; tho' I fear not so much as the title promises.) The great discoveries of Manuscripts; the many observations that have been made by the Learned Bishop of Worcester and others, upon the Constitution of the British and Saxon Churches; and the general approbation that the Work must needs meet with; are all of 'em very good Encouragements to such an Undertaking. Next to his Glossary and Councils; we are to give an account of that part of his Works, wherein he asserts a due Veneration to Persons, Places, and Things, consecrated to the service of God. 〈…〉 The first that he published of this kind, was his noted Treatise De non temerandis Ecclesiis; printed at London in the 16●3. and afterwards at other places. It was written (as the title informs us) for the sake of a Gentleman, who having an appropriate Parsonage, employed the Church to profane uses, and left the Parishioners uncertainly provided of Divine Service in a Parish there adjoining. The two Oxford Editions came forth with a large Preface by his son Clement Spelman, containing many things relating to Impropriations, and several instances of the judgements of God upon Sacrilege. The greatest part of these instances seems to be taken from his History and Fate of Sacrilege, a book still in Manuscript. The Gentleman, for whose sake it was written, died immediately upon the publication of this book; but however it did very good service to the Church. This, Mr. Stephens has made appear, in a Preface to some of his Posthumous Works; wherein he instances in several Gentlemen who were induced by the reading of this book, to restore their Impropriations to the Church. That part of the Preface is since reprinted before an Edition of this book which came out in the Year 1668. and therefore I shall not repeat the Catalogue of them in this place. I will only beg leave to mention a more modern benefaction of this kind; as it is set down in the late Edition of Camden's Britannia 1 Pag▪ ●24. . Scarce two miles from Arksey (in the West-riding of Yorkshire) lies Adwick in the street, memorable on this account, that Mrs. Ann Savill (a Virgin benefactor yet living) daughter of John Savill of Medly Esq purchased the Rectory thereof, for which she gave about 900l. and has settled it in the hands of trusties for the use of the Church for ever; and this from a generous and pious principle upon the reading of Sir Henry Spelman's noted Treatise, De non temerandis Ecclesiis. Some reflections were made upon this Discourse, by an unknown Author; who could not forgive Sir Henry for paying so much respect to Churches, and particularly for applying the word Ecclesia to a material Church; urging that this term belongs only to the Assembly or Congregation. This Sir Henry takes notice of in his Glossary, under the title Ecclesia, producing some instances of the use of that word in ancient Authors: and afterwards honoured it with a fuller Apology. It is published by Mr. Stephens, at the end of his Larger work of Tithes, (so called with respect to the Smaller Treatise De non temerandis Ecclesiis;) together with a pious Epistle to Mr. Richard Carew, who in a Letter to the Author had expressed his dissatisfaction in some particulars of this Work. Larger Work of Tithes. His next book upon this subject, is that which he calls the Larger work of Tithes; published by Mr. Jerem. Stephens in the Year 1646. with an excellent Preface by the same hand. In this Discourse, he asserts Tithes to the Clergy, from the Laws of Nature and of Nations; from the Commands of God in the Old and New Testament; and from the particular Constitution of our own Kingdom. The History and Fate of Sacrilege, MS Another work, in vindication of the Rights of the Church, is still in Manuscript, with this title; The History and Fate of Sacrilege, discovered by examples of Scripture, of Heathens, and of Christians; from the beginning of the world continually to this day, by Sir Henry Spelman Kt. Anno Domini 1632. The account which the 2 Ath. Oxon p. 230. Part 2. Oxford Antiquary gives us of it, is this: In the Year 1663. Mr. Stephens began to print the History of Sacrilege, designed and began by Sir Henry Spelman, and left to Mr. Stephens to perfect and publish. But that work sticking long in the Press, both the Copy, and sheets printed off, perished in the grand Conflagration of London, 1666. I have been told by a Learned Divine ▪ since, a Prelate of our Church,) that Mr. Stephens was forbidden to proceed in an Edition of that Work, lest the publication of it should give offence to the Nobility and Gentry▪ But, whatever was the occasion of its continuing in the Press till the Fire of London; it has been taken for granted, that the whole book was irrecoverably lost: and I was satisfied of the same▪ upon Mr. Wood's relation of the matter; till examining some Manuscripts which were given to the Bodleian Library by the late Bishop of Lincoln, I met with a transcript of some part of it. Upon further enquiry, I found other parts, in other places: so that now the Work seems to be pretty entire. He begins with a general definition of Sacrilege; then reckons up various kinds of it, as to Places, Persons, and Things; after which, he enumerates (at large) the many signal punishments of it among Heathens, Jews, and Christians; describing more particularly the instances of that kind, which have formerly happened in our Nation. Then, he proceeds to give an account of the attempt upon the lands of the Clergy in Henry the IV's. time, and how it was disappointed; afterwards he descends to the suppression of Priories-Alien in the Reign of Henry V. and so on to the general Dissolution under Henry VIII. Here, he shows us the several steps of the Dissolution; the King's express promise to employ the Lands to the advancement of Learning, Religion, and Relief of the Poor; with the remarkable Calamities that ensued, upon the King, his Posterity, his principal Agents in that affair, the new Owners of the Lands, and the Lords who promoted and passed the Dissolution Act: Concluding with a Chapter, which contains The particulars of divers Monasteries in Norfolk, whereof the late Owners since the Dissolution are extinct, or decayed, or overthrown by Misfortunes and grievous Accidents. This is a short account of a large Work: wherein the judicious Author is far from affirming, that their being concerned in this Affair (either as promoters of the Alienation or Possessors of the Lands) was directly the occasion of the Calamities that ensued. On the contrary, he declares more than once, that he will not presume to judge of the secret methods of God's Providence; but only relates plain matters of fact, and leaves every man to make his own application. Tho' it must be granted, that many of the instances (and those well asserted) are so terrible in the Event, and in the Circumstances so surprising; that no considering Man can well pass them over, without a serious reflection. This Discourse might have appeared among his other Posthumous Works; but that some persons in the present Age would be apt to interpret the mention of their Predecessors (in such a manner, and on such an occasion) as an unpardonable reflection upon their Families. Codex Legum Veterum MS. These, I think, are all the Treatises that he either wrote or published about the Rights of the Church. The next Work that I shall mention, is a History of the Civil affairs of the Kingdom, from the Conquest to Magna Charta, taken from our best Historians, and generally set down in their own words. It is a Manuscript in the Bodleian Library, and the title which Sir Henry has given it, is this: Codex Legum Veterum & Statutorum regni Angliae, quae ab ingressu Gulielmi, usque ad annum nonum Henrici tertii edita sunt; Hoc est, ante primum Statutum omnium Impressorum in libris juridicis, quod Magna Charta appellatur, ab Edwardo I. confirmata. E variis monimentis, Authoribus, Manuscriptis, & antiquis paginis concinnatum. Opere & Study Henrici Spelman collecta. Anno Dom. 1627. With the Imprimatur of Sir John Bramston, July 6. 1640. Many Instruments in this Collection, are printed in the Second Volume of his Councils; and it might be much improved from some Historians that have been published since his time. De Sepultura. In the Year 1641. there came out a Discourse de Sepultura, by Sir Henry Spelman, concerning the Fees for Burials. 'Tis likely, that it was composed on occasion of his being one of the Commissioners for regulating the Fees, in our Civil and Ecclesiastical Courts. The Treatise consists of five sheets in 4 to. so that I wonder why J. A. in his Preface to the Glossary, should tell us that is was no more than two leaves. Aspilogia His Latin Treatise entitled Aspilogia was next published (with Notes) by Sir Edw. Bish Anno 1654. in Folio. In this (tho' it was one of his first Pieces) he discourses with great variety of Learning concerning the Original and different kinds of those Marks of Honour, since called Arms. Book of Abbreviations. He also drew up a scheme of the Abbreviations and such other obsolete forms of writing, as occur in our old Manuscripts; to facilitate the reading of ancient Books and Records. There are several Copies of it in Manuscript; as, one in the Bodleian Library; another in the Library of the late Dr. Plot; a third in the possession of Mr. Worsley of Lincolns-Inn; and 'tis probable, there may be more of▪ 'em abroad in other hands. 〈…〉 Two other things he was concerned in; which I shall but just mention. The Villare Anglicum, or a view of the Towns in England, (published in the Year 1656.) was collected 1 Pref. to that Book. By the appointment, at the charge, and for the use of that 〈…〉 worthy Antiquary Sir Henry Spelman. And Mr. Speed, in his Description of Great Britain, acknowledges that he received the account of Norfolk from the same Learned Knight. As for his Posthumous Works which are published together on this occasion, I shall give a more particular account of 'em in the Preface; and in this place shall only add an instance or 〈…〉 two, of his Encouragement to Learning and Learned Men. It was he, who first advised Dr. Wats to the study of Antiquities, and when he had arrived to a good skill in those matters, put him upon a new Edition of Matthew Paris. The Doctor, in the Preface to that excellent Work, makes this grateful mention of his Friend, and Patron: Tertium Manuscriptum accommodavit Nobilis ille Doctissimusque Dominus Henricus Spelmannus Eques Auratus, Eruditionis reconditioris, Judicii acerrimi Vir, nostrae Britanniae Lumen Gloriaque; Amicus insupermeus singularis, in studiis adjutor praecipuus; & qui me primus ad Antiquitates eruendas tam verbo quam exemplo aliquoties stimulavit erudivitque. He was likewise a great Favourer of Sir William Dugdale; who had been recommended to him by Sir Simon Archer, a Gentleman of Warwickshire, very well versed in Heraldry, and the affairs of our own Nation. At that time, Mr. Dodsworth (who was much assisted and encouraged by Sir Henry Spelman) had got together a vast collection of Records, relating to the Foundation of Monasteries in the Northern parts of England. Sir Henry thought that these might be very well improved into a Monasticon Anglicanum; and lest the design should miscarry by Mr. Dodsworth's death, he prevailed upon Mr. Dugdale to join him in so commendable a Work; promising to communicate all his Transcripts of Foundation Charters, belonging to several Monasteries in Norfolk and Suffolk. For his further encouragement, he recommended him to Thomas Earl of Arundel, than Earl Marshal of England, as a person very well qualified to serve the King in the Office of Arms. Accordingly, upon his character of him (seconded by the importunity of Sir Christopher Hatton) he was settled in the Heralds-office; which gave him an opportunity to fix in London, and from the many assistances there, to compile the laborious Volumes which he afterwards published. His revival of the old Saxon Tongue, aught to be reckoned a good piece of service to the study of Antiquities. He had found the excellent use of that Language in the whole course of his Studies; and very much lamented the neglect of it, both at home and abroad: which was so general, that he did not then know one Man in the world, who perfectly knew it. Paulatim (says he) ita exhalavit animam, nobile illud Majorum nostrorum & pervetustum idioma; ut in universo (quod sciam) orbe, ne unus hodie reperiatur; qui hoc scite perfecteve calleat; pauci quidem, qui vel exoletas literas usquequaque noverint. Hereupon he settled a Saxon Lecture in the University of Cambridge, allowing 20l. per An. to Mr. Abraham Wheelock; who tells us, 1 Dedicat. ad Tho. Adamsium ante Bedam. that upon his advice and encouragement, he spent the best part of seven years in the study of that Language: Magnam septennii quod effluxit partem consumpsi Saxonum nostrorum inquirendo Monumenta, eorumque vetus idioma (Veritatis & pacis Catholicae magistram) perquirendo; ne nobilissimi Viri & in his studiis monitoris mei honoratissimi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 D. Henrici Spelmanni, Antiquitatum nostrae gentis instauratoris eximii, consilio defuissem. This stipend was intended to be made perpetual; but both He and his eldest Son dying in the compass of two years, the Civil Wars breaking forth, and the Estate being sequestered; the Family became uncapable of accomplishing that Design. Nor indeed was that a Time for settlements of this kind, when such a terrible storm threatened the Universities and the Revenues that belonged to 'em. Acquaintance. After he came into business, he was intimately acquainted with the most considerable Persons of that Age. He calls Mr. Camden, his ancient Friend; and how entire a Familiarity there was between him and Archbishop Usher, we are informed from the Life and Letters of that Learned Primate. To these I might add Sir Rob. Cotton, Mr. Selden, Olaus Wormius; with Peireschius, Meursius, Beignonius, and others of great note both at home and abroad, whom he himself occasionally mentions, as the chief Encouragers of his Glossary. Upon the whole matter; as his Loyalty, Wisdom, and Experience in public Affairs, would sufficiently recommend him to the great Statesmen of his time; so his eminent Piety and Learning must needs make him highly esteemed among Divines and Scholars. Children. He had eight Children, four Sons and four Daughters. His eldest Son (the heir of his Studies, 3 Praef. ad Concil. T. 1. as he calls him) was John 2 Camd. Ep. 226. Spelman Esq a Scholar and a Gentleman; who had great assurances of favour and encouragement from King Charles I. This good Prince sent for Sir Henry Spelman, and offered him the Mastership of Suttons Hospital, with some other things, in consideration of his good services both to Church and State. But after his humble thanks to his Majesty, he told him, that he was very old and had one foot in the grave; and that it would be a much greater obligation upon him, if his Majesty would please to consider his Son. Accordingly, the King sent for Mr. Spelman; and with many expressions of kindness, immediately 〈◊〉 Spelman conferred on him the honour of Knighthood. After the Civil Wars broke out, his Majesty, by a Letter under his own hand, commanded him from his own house in Norfolk, to give his attendance at Oxford; where he was oftentimes called to Private Council, and employed to write several papers in Vindication of the Proceedings of the Court. But while he was thus attending the affairs of the Public, and▪ when these would give him leave) his own Private Studies; he fell sick, and died the 25. of July, 1643. His Funeral Sermon, by his majesty's special order, was Preached by Archbishop Usher; an intimate Acquaintance both of the Father and Son. In the Year 1640. he had published the Saxon Psalter from an ancient MS. of Sir Henry's; which (as he tells us in the Preface) was a task enjoined him by his Father. He also wrote the Life of King Alfred in English; which having lain several years in Manuscript, was at last translated into Latin, and published in 1678. with Mr. Walker's Commentary upon it. Clement Spelman. Clement Spelman (youngest Son to Sir Henry) was a Councillor, and made Puny Baron of the Exchequer, upon the Restoration of King Charles II. He 1 Wood, Ath Oxon. p. 511. part 2. published some pieces relating to the Government, and a large Preface to his Father's Book De non temerandis Ecclesiis. Dying in June 1679. he was buried in St. Dunstan's Church in Fleetstreet. 〈…〉 To return to Sir Henry: He died in London, at the house of Sir Ralph Whitfeild his Son-in-law; being about 80. years of Age. His body, by the favour of King Charles, was appointed to be interred in Westminster-Abbey; whither it was carried with great solemnity, on the 24 th'. of October, 1641. and buried at the foot of the Pillar over against Mr. Camden's Monument. The Several DISCOURSES Contained in this Volume. 1. THe Original, Growth, Propagation and Condition of Feuds and Tenors by Knight-service, in England, pag. 1. CHAP. I. The occasion of this Discourse, and what a Feud is, p. 1. CHAP. II. The Original, Growth, and Propagation of Feuds: first in general, then in England, p. 2. CHAP. III. That none of our Feodal words, nor words of Tenure, are found in any Law or ancient Charter of the Saxons, p. 7. CHAP. IU. Of Tenors in Capite, more particularly, p. 10. CHAP. V. What degrees and distinctions of Persons were among the Saxons, and of what condition their Lands were, p. 11. CHAP. VI Of Earls among our Saxons, p. 13. CHAP. VII. Of Ceorls; and that they were ordinarily but as Tenants at will; or having Lands, held not by Knight-service, p. 14. CHAP. VIII. Of Thanes, and their several kinds, p. 16. CHAP. IX. Charters of Thanelands granted by Saxon Kings, not only without mention of Tenure or Feodal-service, but with all Immunity, except Expedition, etc. p. 19 CHAP. X. Observations upon the precedent Charters, showing that the Thanelands or Expedition were not Feodal, or did lie in Tenure, p. 21. CHAP. XI. More touching the freedom of Thaneland out of Doomsday, p. 23. CHAP. XII. The fruits of Feodal Tenors; and that they were not found among the Saxons, or not after our manner, p. 24. CHAP. XIII. No profit of Land by Wardship in the Saxons time, p. 25. CHAP. XIV. No Wardship in England amongst the Saxons: objections answered, p. 25. CAAP. XV. No Marriage of Wards, p. 29. CHAP. XVI. No Livery; no Primer-seisin, p. 30. CHAP. XVII. That Reliefs (whereon the Report most relieth) were not in use among the Saxons; nor like their Heriots, p. 31. CHAP. XVIII. Difference between Heriots and Reliefs, p. 32. CHAP. XIX. No Fines for Licence of Alienation, p. 33. CHAP. XX. No Feodal Homage among the Saxons, p. 34. CHAP. XXI. What manner of Fealty among the Saxons, p. 34. CHAP. XXII. No Escuage among the Saxons: what in the Empire, p. 36. CHAP. XXIII. No Feodal Escheat of hereditary Lands among the Saxons, p. 37. CHAP. XXIV. Thaneland and Reveland what: no marks of Tenure, but distinctions of Land-holders', p. 38. CHAP. XXV. How the Saxons held their Lands; and what obliged them to so many kinds of Services, p. 40. CHAP. XXVI. The Charter whereby Oswald Bishop of Worcester, disposed divers Lands of his Church after the Feodal manner of that time, entitled, Indiculum Libertatis de Oswalds-Laws-Hundred, p. 41. CHAP. XXVII. Inducements to the Conclusion, p. 43. CHAP. XXVIII. The Conclusion, p. 46. II. Of the Ancient Government of England, p. 49. III. Of Parliaments, p. 57 IV. The Original of the four Terms of the Year, p. 67. The Occasion of this Discourse, p. 69. SECT. I. Of the Terms in general, p. 71. SECT. II. Of the names of Terms, ibid. SECT. III. Of the Original of Terms or Law-days, p. 73▪ SECT. IV. Of the Times assigned to Law-matters, called the Terms, ibid. CHAP. I. Of Law-days among the Ancients, p. 74. CHAP. II. Of Law-days amongst the Romans, using choice days, p. 75. CHAP. III. Of Law-days among the first Christians, using all times alike, p. 75. CHAP. IU. How Sunday came to be exempted, p. 76. CHAP. V. How other Festival and Vacation-days were exempted, ibid. CHAP. VI That our Terms took their original from the Canon-law, p. 77. CHAP. VII. The Constitution of our Saxon Kings in this matter, ibid. CHAP. VIII. The Constitution of Canutus, more particular, p. 78. CHAP. IX. The Constitution of Edw. the Confessor, most material, p. 79. CHAP. X. The Constitution of William the Conqueror, p. 80. CHAP. XI. What done by Will. Rufus, Henry I. K. Stephen, and Hen. II. p. 81. CHAP. XII. The Terms laid out according to their ancient Laws, p. 82. CHAP. XIII. Easter-term, p. 83. CHAP. XIV. Trinity-term, p. 84. CHAP. XV. Of Michaelmass-term, according to the ancient Constitutions, p. 85. CHAP. XVI. The later Constitutions of the Terms, p. 86. CHAP. XVII. How Trinity term was altered and shortened, p. 87. CHAP. XVIII. [How Michaelmass-term was abbreviated by Act of Parliament, 16. Car. I. Cap. 6.] p. 81. SECT. V. Other considerations concerning Termtime, ibid. CHAP. I. Why the High-Courts sit not in the afternoons, p. 89. CHAP. II. Why they sit not at all some days, p. 90. CHAP. III. Why some Law business may be done on days exempted, p. 93. CHAP. IU. Why the end of Michaelmass-term is sometimes holden in Advent, and of Hilary in Septuagesima, etc. p. 95. CHAP. V. Why Assizes be holden in Lent, ibid. CHAP. VI Of the Returns, p. 96. CHAP. VII. Of the Quarta dies post, p. 97. CHAP. VIII. Why there is so much Canon and Foreign Law used in this Discourse; with an excursion into the original of our Laws, p. 98. Appendix, p. 104. V. An Apology for Archbishop Abbot, touching the death of Peter Hawkins the Keeper, wounded in the Park at Bramsil, July 24. 1621. p. 107. VI An Answer to the said Apology, p. 111. VII. Letters and Instruments relating to the kill of Hawkins, by the A. B. p. 121. VIII. Of the Original of Testaments and Wills, and of their Probate, to whom it it anciently belonged, p. 127. IX. Icenia, sive Norfolciae Descriptio Topographica, p. 133. X. Catalogus Comitum Marescallorum Angliae, p. 165. XI. Dissertatio de Milite, p. 172. De aetate Militari, p. 174. De evocatis ad Militiam suscipiendam, p. 175. De modo ●reandi Militem honoratum; & primo de Cingulo militari, p. 176. Qui olim fiebant Milites, p. 179. Qui possint militem facere, p. 180. Judices etiam sub appellatione Militum censeri; scil. Equ. esse Palatinos', p. 182. De loco & tempore Creationis, p. 183. De Censu militari, p. 184. Modus Exauctorandi Militem, quod Degradare nuncupatur. XII. Historia Familiae de Sharnburn, p. 187. XIII. Familiae Extraneorum (sive Lestrange) accurata descriptio, p. 200. XIV. A Dialogue concerning the Coin of the Kingdom; particularly, what great treasures were exhausted from England, by the usurped Supremacy of Rome, p. 203. XV. A Catalogue of the Places or Dwellings of the Archbishops and Bishops of this Realm (now or of former times) in which their several Owners have Ordinary Jurisdiction, as if parcel of their Diocese, tho' they be situate within the precinct of another Bishop's Diocese, p. 211. THE Original, Growth, Propagation and Condition OF FEUDS and TENORS BY KNIGHT-SERVICE, In ENGLAND. CHAP. I. The occasion of this Discourse, and what a Feud is. IN the great case of Tenors, upon the Commission of Defective Titles, argued by all the Judges of Ireland, and published after their resolution by the commandment of the Lord Deputy, this year 1639. it fell out upon the fourth point of the Case to be affirmed, That Tenors had their original in England before the Norman Conquest: And in pursuit of this Assertion it was concluded, That Feuds were then and there in use. In proof hereof divers Laws and Charters of the Saxon Kings, and some other Authorities be there alleged, which being conceived to have cleared that point, it thus followeth in the Report, p. 35. And therefore it was said that Sir Henry Spelman was mistaken, who in his Glossary (verbo Feodum) refers the original of Feuds in England to the Norman Conquest. And for a Corollary (p. 38.) addeth these words: Neither is the bare conjecture of Sir Henry Spelman sufficient to take away the force of these Laws. Vide Spelman in Glossar. verbo Feodum. Being thus by way of voucher made a chief Antagonist to the Reverend opinion of these learned, grave, and honoured Judges, I humbly desire of them, that writing what I did so long ago, and in a transitory passage among a thousand other obscure words (not thinking then to be provoked to this account) they will be pleased to pardon my mistake where they fall, and to hear without offence, what motives led me to my conjectures which they speak of. It is necessary therefore, that first of all we make the question certain, which (in my understanding) is not done in the Report. For it is not declared whether there were divers kinds of Feuds or no; nor what kind they were that were in use among the Saxons: nor what kind those were that I conjectured to be brought in by the Norman Conqueror. I will therefore follow the direction of the Orator, and fix the question upon the definition. 〈…〉 definition of a 〈◊〉. A Feud is said to be Vsus fruct●s quidam rei immobilis sub conditione fidei. But this Definition is of too large extent for such kind of Feuds as our Question must consist upon: for it includeth two members or species greatly differing one from the other, the one Temporary and revocable, (as those at Will or for Years, Li●e or Lives) the other Hereditary and perpetual. As for Temporary ●eu●s, which (like wild figtrees) could yield none of the feodal fruits of Wardship, Marriage, Relief, etc. unto their Lords, they belong nothing unto our argument, nor shall I make other use in setting of them forth, than to assure the Reader they are not those that our Laws take notice of. To come therefore to our proper Scheme, let us see what that Hereditary Feud is, whereupon our Question must be fixed: for none but this can bear the feodal fruits we speak of, Wardship, Marriage, etc. Th● 〈…〉. 1 Cujac. in praefat. ad. lib. 1. feud. p. 10. & seq. A Feud is a right which the Vassal hath in Land, or some immovable thing of his Lords, to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily: rendering unto his Lord such feodal duties and services as belong to military tenure: the mere propriety of the soil always remaining unto the Lord. I call it as the Feudists do, Jus utendi praedio alieno; a right to use another man's Land, not a property in it; for in true feodal speech the Tenant or Vassal hath nothing in the 2 Cujac. ad lib. 3. feud. tit. 1. p. 178. propriety of the soil itself, but it remaineth entirely unto the Lord, and is comprehended under the usual name which we now give it of the signory. So that the signory and the Feud being joined together, seem to make that absolute and complete estate of Inheritance, which the Feudists in time of old called Allodium. But this kind of Feud (we speak of) and no other, is that only whereof our Law taketh notice, though time hath somewhat varied it from the first institution, by drawing the propriety of the soil from the Lord unto the Tenant. And I both conceive and affirm under correction, That this our kind of Feuds being perpetual and hereditary, and subject to Wardship, Marriage, and Relief, with other feodal services, were not in use among our Saxons; nor our Law of Tenors (whereon they depend) once known unto them. As shall appear by that which hereafter followeth. CHAP. II. The Original, Growth, and Propagation of Feuds: first in general, then in England. BEfore I enter into the Question in hand, it will be necessary for better understanding that which followeth, to set forth the original, growth, propagation, and condition of Feuds in general: which I conceive to be thus. There were no doubt from the beginning of Jus Gentium, Lords and Servants; and those servants of two sorts. Some to attend and guard the person of their Lord upon all occasions in War and Peace. Some to manure his Lands for the sustenance of him and his Family. When private Families were drawn into a Kingdom, the Kings themselves held this distribution. Instances of Feuds among the 〈◊〉. Examples hereof are in all Nations. 3 1 Chron. ●hap. 23, & 2● King David well observed it in the Institution of the Kingdom of Israel: where, if such services have any show of Feuds or Tenors, we have a pattern for them all: viz. For that of Francalmoine 4 Ibid. Cap. 23. in the Levites: for Knight-service, Tenure in Capite, and Grand Serjeanty 5 Cap. 27. in the Military men, which served the King personally by monthly courses: for Socage, in those whom David appointed to manure the Fields, dress the Vineyards, the Olive-trees, the Mulberry-trees, and that had the care of the Oil, of the Oxen, of the Camels, Asses, Sheep, etc. For the lands and portion of the Levites was given to do the service of the Tabernacle; 1 Num. 21. 14. 1 Kings 13. 17. the lands of the other tribes, to fight the battles of the Lord against his idolatrous enemies, and to root them out. Thus may fancy couple the remotest things. To come lower down and nearer home, 2 Lib. de Phocid. p. 118. Pausanias tell's us, that when Brennus (who they say was a Britain) invaded Greece with an army of Gauls; every horseman of the better sort, had two other Among the Gauls. horsemen to attend and second him (as his Vassals) and they three together were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Trimarcesiam, i. e. a society of three horsemen. 3 Bell. Gall. lib. 6. p. 118. But Caesar saith, that the nobler gaul's in his time, had (according to their abilities) many horsemen attending them in war, whom by a Germane word he calleth Ambactos, which properly signifieth servants, vassals, workmen, Ambact●. and labourers; yet he by a fairer name expoundeth it there 4 Bell. Gall. p. 184. in Latin Clientes, and in another place 5 Ibid. p. 124. calleth them among the Germans Comites & familiares, as accounting them (like Abraham's 6 Genes. 14. 14. 318. Soldier's) to be all their Lord's followers and of his family. Tacitus 7 Germ. Mor. p. 129. likewise nameth them Comites, as companions and followers; quod bello sequi Dominum coguntur, saith 8 Cujac. ad Constit. Lotharii feud. lib. 5. p. 284. Cujacius. But Tacitus further saith, Gradus quinetiam ipse Comitatus habet judicio ejus quem sectantur; that there were degrees in those companies, as he whom they followed did appoint. Like them, perhaps, in after-ages of Earls, Barons, Knights, etc. But how the Comites or Ambacti were maintained, neither Caesar nor yet Tacitus have related. As for such portions of land, as we call Knights-Fees, they could not then have any; for Caesar 9 Bell. Gall. lib. 6. p. 120. speaking of the Germans saith, (and so it appears by Tacitus) 10 Germ. Mor. neque quisque agri modum certum, aut fines proprios habet, etc. That no man hath any certain estate or peculiar bounds of lands; but the Magistrate and Lords (of the place) assign from year to year to kindreds and such as live together, what quantity of land, and in what place they think good; and the next year force them to remove. The reason you may see in Caesar, who 11 Bell. Gall. p. 121. also showeth, That they had no common Magistrate; but the Lord of the Town or territory set what laws he would among his followers or Ambactos. These laws, the Goths, the Swedes, the Danes, and Saxons, called Bilagines; of By, which in all these languages signifieth a town, and lagh or laghen which signifieth laws, as Gravius 12 In Epist. ad Bon. Vulcan. Vid. Bellagines in Glossario nostro. Suecus, and our Saxon Authors testify. And tho' Jornandes a Spanish Goth writeth it after the Spanish corruption Bellagine●, yet we in England keep the very radix and word itself By-laws even unto this day, tho' diverted somewhat from the sense that Caesar speaks of. For we call them Town-laws or By-laws which the Townsmen make among themselves; but Caesar showeth that the Lords imposed them. Herewith agreeth, that of Tacitus, or some other Ancient, who speaking of the Germans saith, Agricolis suis jus dicunt, They give laws to them which dwell upon their lands. For I take Agricolis here in the larger sense, to extend to all that dwell upon the Lord's lands (as well his military followers as his husbandmen) in the same manner as solicolae containeth all that live upon the soil, ruricolae all that live in the Country, and coelicolae all that live in heaven. These Lordships of Towns, which Caesar speaketh of, were after by the Normans called Maneria. The Ambacti or Comites, and these which he saith sectabantur Dominos suos, were called Vassalli, and sectatores manerii sive Curiae Domini Vassals and Suitors of Court. The Bilagines or Town-laws were called Consuetudines and customs of the Manor. The jurisdiction, which the Lord had over his followers and suitors, was called the Court Baron, and the portions of land, etc. assigned to his followers for their stipend or maintenance, were at first called Munera, after Beneficia; and lastly Feuda or Tenant-lands, which were of two sorts, one for military men called Feudum militare and Feudum nobile, tenure by Knights-service; the other for husbandmen called therefore Feudum rusticum & ignobile, tenure in Socage, or by the Plough. Thus it appeareth that Feuds and Tenors and the Feudal law itself, took their original from the Germans and Northern Nations. In such condition therefore (how obscure soever) as Caesar and Tacitus left them to us, 1 Cujac. in pr●●. a● lib. p. 1. Gerardus Niger the Consul of Milan (who flourished about A. D. 1176. and first composed them into a book) taketh them up as he there findeth them, and speaking of the times of Caesar and Tacitus (as having the forementioned passages under his eye) saith, Antiquissimo tempore sic erat in Dominorum potestate connexum, ut quando vellent, possent auferre rem in feudum à se datam. And this agreeth with Caesar, by whom it seemeth in the places before mentioned, that the Ambacti or followers of the Germans had in those times either no land at all, or no estate at all in their land, or first but at the will of the Lord, and then but for one single year. Which Gerardus also confesseth to have been the condition of the eldest sort of feudataries, for he saith presently after his former words, Postea vero eo ventum est, ut per annum tantum stabilitatem haberent (res in feudum datae). Thus for another while their Feudal Vassals (whom here he calleth fideles, and we now tenants by Knights-Service) enjoyed their feuds no otherwise than from year to year at the pleasure of their Lords, either by grant or sufferance, 2 Cujac. ad li● 1. feud. p. 21. till further grace confirmed them to them for divers years, and at length for term of life, which Gerardus also presently there declareth, saying, Deinde statutum est ut usque ad vitam fidelis producerentur (feuda.) In this manner stood the principal feuds themselves, even those of Earldoms and Dukedoms (which they call feuda majora and feuda regalia) in the latter time of the Saxons, till the coming of the Conqueror. But as touching the lesser feuds which we call Knights-Fees, I find nothing in Abby-books, otherwise than a numerous multitude of Leases and Grants made by Bishops and Abbats to their followers for term of life, without mention of Tenure or Feudal service. Yet I must confess that there is a notable precedent 3 Vid infra Chap. ●6 left us by Oswald Bishop of Worcester in the time of King Edgar, who in granting out the lands of his Bishopric unto his followers, for life or three lives, imposed upon them by a solemn Instrument, ratified by the King himself, a multitude of services and charges, as well military as civil: which after you shall here see, and then consider how and whether they conduce to our Feuds or not. Tenu●e●●●r Li●e. If we understand them to be Feuds among the Saxons or of that nature, then are we sure they were no more than for life, and not inheritable nor stretching further, without further grace obtained from the Lord. For which purpose Conradus Salicus (a French Emperor, but of Germane descent) going to Rome about forty five years before the time of our King Edgar (viz. sub An. Dom. 915.) to fetch his Crown from Pope John X. made a Constitution upon the petition of his Soldiers: That filii or aviatici, the sons, or if no Sons were living the Nephews or Grandsons (as they call them) of some of them, should succeed in the Feud of their Father. (See the Constitution in the beginning of the fifth book of Feuds.) But Gerardus noteth that this law settled not the Feud upon the eldest Son, or any other Son of the feudatory particularly; but left it in the Lord's election to please himself with which of them he would. After this, Feuds were continued in divers places by several increments to the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh generation, and sometime (for want of lineal issue) collaterally to the brother, as Gerardus testifieth; but whether by some positive law, or by the munificence of the Lords, he doth not tell us; nor when or by whom they were made perpetual and hereditary; tho' he confesseth, that at last they grew to be extended in infinitum, and then they began to be settled upon the eldest Son, who formerly had no pre-eminence above a younger brother. But while they stood sometimes produced in this manner by the indulgence of Princes, to the third, fourth, or fifth generation, etc. some men of learning have concluded them to be hereditary, as tho' there were no medium between a limitation (how far so ever extended) and infinitum. How Feuds became hereditary. To pass by that; let us now go on in examination, when and how Feuds became Hereditary. Some suggest a show of such a matter under the two Othones, German Emperors (who succeeded one the other about the year 973.) But to rest upon the common and received opinion (which we shall hereafter more at large declare,) the truth is, that when Hugh Capet usurped the Kingdom of France againgst the Carolinges, he to fortify himself, and to draw all the Nobility of France to support his Faction about the year 987. granted to them in the year 988. that whereas till then they enjoyed their Feuds and Honours but for life or at pleasure of their Princes; they should from thenceforth for ever hold them to them, and their heirs, in Feudal manner by the Ceremony of Homage, and oath of Fealty: And that he would accordingly maintain them therein, as they supported him and his heirs in the Crown of France; which they joyfully accepted. Feuds hereditary in England. This was a fair direction for William of Normandy (whom we call the Conqueror) how to secure himself of this his new acquired Kingdom of England; and he pretermitted not to take the advantage of it. For with as great diligence as providence, he presently transferred his Country-customs into England (as the Black book of the Chequer witnesseth) and amongst them (as after shall be made perspicuous) this new French custom of making Feuds hereditary, not regarding the former use of our Saxon Ancestors; who, like all other Nations, save the French, continued till that time their Feuds and Tenors, either arbitrary or in some definite limitation, according to the ancient manner of the Germans, received generally throughout Europe. For by the multitude of their Colonies and transmigrations into all the chiefest parts thereof, they carried with them such Feodal rights, as were then in use amongst them; and planting those rites and customs in those several Countries where they settled themselves, did by that means make all those several Countries to hold a general conformity in their Feuds and Military customs. So by the Longobards they were carried into Italy, by the Saliques into the Eastern parts of France, by the Franks into the West part thereof, by the Saxons into this our Britain, by their neighbours the Western Goths (who communicated with the Germans in manners, laws, and customs,) into Spain; and by the Eastern Goths into Greece itself, and the Eastern parts of Europe, etc. These (I say) carried with them into the parts of Europe, where they settled, such ancient Feudal customs, as at the time of their transmigration were in use among them. But the more prevalent and more generally received customs, were those that were in use or taken up in the time of Conradus the Emperor, and when Feuds became hereditary; for on them especially is the Feudal Law grounded and composed, tho' enlarged oftentimes by Constitutions of the Emperors, and spread abroad into divers Nations by their example, countenance, or authority. Wherein the Court of Milan was chiefly followed in rebus judicatis (as appeareth by Duarenus 1 Comment. in consuet. F●●d. Cap. 1. and Merula 2 Rex Mediolan. lib. 3. ;) but reserving unto every Nation their peculiar rights and customs. 3 Gunt. p. 409. For it was generally received into every Kingdom, and then conceived to be the most absolute law for supporting the Royal estate, preserving union, confirming peace, and suppressing robberies, incendiaries, and rebellions. I conclude with Cujacius, who upon the abovecited passages of Gerardus Niger, saith, 1 A● lib. 1. Feud. Tit. 1. p. 21. Quam aliam Feudorum originem quaerimus? His veluti incrementis paulatim feuda constituta sunt; quae & post Conradum usus recepit, ut transirent ad liberos mares in infinitum, etc. The great growth of 〈◊〉 ●s to title. The Military and Lay-Feuds being thus advanced from an arbitrary condition to become perpetual and hereditary, 2 Cujac. Feud. lib. 3. p. 180. did now in ordinary account leave their former name of Beneficia (which were only temporary for years, or life) unto the Livings of the Clergy, and retained to themselves the proper name of Feuds, whereby they were produced to be perpetual and hereditary. Cujacius therefore speaking of them both, saith, 3 Ibid. Feudum differt a beneficio, quod hoc temporaneum fuit, illud perpetuum. And treating in another place of these beneficiarii and temporarii possessores, he saith further, 4 Lib. 1. p. 7. jisdem postea c●pit concedi feudum in perpetuum, quod est verum, & proprium Feudum. Concluding in a third place, 5 Feud. lib. 1. p. 5. that Propria Feudi natura haec est, ut sit perpetua. So that Cassineus in the Feuds of Burgundy saith, 6 〈◊〉 3. ●. 5. 〈◊〉 437. that Omne Feudum quocunque modo acquisitum fit haereditarium, cum successione sit redactum ad instar Allodialium: That all Feuds by what means soever they be acquired, are made hereditary; in so much as by the continual succession of the children into the Feuds of their Fathers, the Feuds are now brought to be like Allodial or patrimonial inheritances. Thus Feudum (which at first was but a tottering possession, ad voluntatem Domini) growing at length to be an irrevocable estate, descending by many successions from son to son, became at last to be an absolute inheritance, and thereupon the words themselves Feudum and Haereditas in common use of speech (Quem penes arbitrium est & jus & norma loquendi) to be voces convertibiles, and by a fair metonymia each to signify other. For as Horace further saith, — Verborum vetus interit aetas, Et juvenum ritu florent modo nata vigentque. Aptly therefore and truly is it said by the ever honoured Justice Littleton, that Feodum idem est quod haereditas; and the captious criticism of Sir Thomas Smith (Dr. of the Civil Law) in denying it, is to his own reproach: for his great Master Cujacius (as before appeareth) supporteth Littleton; and his fellow Civilians do tell him, quoth in feudis particularis & localis consuetudo attendenda est. And Littleton received it as used in this signification from the eldest writers of our Law. Of the like indiscretion is that of Dr. cowel, who carpeth at this ancient phrase used in the formulis of our pleading, where it is ordinarily said, Rex seisitus fuit in Dominico suo ut de feodo, as though de feodo was there to be understood according to the Court of Milan, for praedium militare superiori Domino & servitiis obnoxium; not by the laws of England, pro directo dominio vel haereditate pura & absoluta. No proper Feuds before the Conquest. To conclude therefore. It appeareth by this passage of Justice Littleton's, joined to that we have formerly delivered, that our Law took no notice of Feuds till they were become hereditary with us; which being since the Conquest (as we have already showed, and shall prove abundantly hereafter) overthroweth all the arguments in the Report produced for proving our Feodal rites of Tenure, Wardship, Marriage, Relief, etc. to have been in use among the Saxons; for till they were hereditary, these appendances could not belong to them. It is also very improbable that Feuds were made hereditary here in England before other Countries; or that the more civil Nations of Europe, should take example herein from our rude (if not illiterate) Saxons. CHAP. III. That none of our Feodal Words, nor Words of Tenure, are found in any Law or ancient Charter of the Saxons. What Tenors were in use among the Saxons. IT appeareth by that which hath been said, that our modern kind of Feuds could not be in use among our English Saxons. And it will now be a question, whether any of our modern Tenors (or which of them) were then in use, or not? The Report saith, It is most manifest that Capite-Tenures, Tenors by Knight-service, Tenure in Socage, Frankalmoign, etc. were frequent in the time of the Saxons. I desire that without offence, I may examine this that is so manifest, and so frequent. I confess there be many specious shows of Knight-service and Socage among our Saxon Ancestors; but whether by way of Tenure, Contract, or De more Gentium, must be well examined. For the Romans and other Nations had formerly as great command over their followers, and such as dwelled upon their lands, as our Saxons had, yet was it without any rule or speech of Tenure. Tenors when first used. The word Tenura is neither known nor found in any Latin Author of antiquity, nor any conjugate thereof (as tenentes, tenementa, tenere or tenendum) in a feodal sense. The first place where I meet with tenere in that manner, is amongst the Saliques and Germans, in the Constitution before mentioned of Conradus the Emperor, about the year 915, when Beneficia (which we now call Feuds) were first continued to some of the sons and grandchildren of the male line of them that then enjoyed them. But I find not one of those words or any consignificant or equivalent to them, in all our Saxon-laws. The word Feodum, Feud or Fee itself, is never mentioned in them, nor is there any sound of Tenure in Capite, Tenure by Knight-service, Tenure in Socage, Frankalmoign, etc. either in our Saxon laws or in the laws of any other Nation (that I can find) till the time that Feuds began to be perpetual or hereditary (as before is mentioned.) It is true that in some Latin Charters of the Saxon time, we now and then find the words Tenere, tenementum, and tenendum: and in a Charter of Beorredus King of the Mercians dated Anno 868. the words de eodem seodo, (as tho' Lordships at that time had been distributed into Feuds;) which being reported by Ingulfus Translation of Saxon Charters. a Saxon, giveth great probability that Feuds were then in use. But it is to be noted, that these Charters are (as I said) in Latin and not in Saxon; and therefore not likely to be the very originals, but translations of them made after the Conquest for the instruction of the Normans, either by Ingulf himself, or some other expert in the Norman language, laws, and customs. Who applying himself to the understanding of the Normans, used Norman words, and such interpretation as they were best acquainted with, tho' differing from the propriety of the Saxon tongue; and so perhaps translated de eodem f●odo for de eodem territorio or patrimonio; and tenentes, tenementa and tenendum, for possidentes, possessiones and possidendum. Not unlike our translators of the holy Scriptures, who tell us of the Arms of Families, Chancellors, Sheriffs, Recorders, Townclerks, Doctors of Law, Homage done to Solomon, and of the arraignment of our blessed Saviour; as tho' the Jewish and Asiatic Nations had in those days of old, their College of Heralds, the same Magistrates, Officers, Degrees in School, Customs of Law, Pleas of the Crown, and form of Government, which we in England have at this day. No Feodal words among the Saxons. By such allusions I suppose (or illusions rather) came our later Feodal words into ancient Latin Charters. I desire to see but one Charter in the Saxon tongue before the Conquest, wherein any Feodal Word is apparently expressed. A Saxon Chronicle telleth us, that King Alfred in the year 896. gave London to Ethelred (an Earl or Alderman that married his daughter Ethelfled) to healdo, that is ad tenendum, which some understand Feodally as to hold it of him; but Wigorniensis reports the matter plainly ad servandum, that is, to keep and defend it. So among the customs of Kent, the word healder (i. e. holder) is used for a Tenant in the Saxon distich there cited. But it is to be noted, that those customs were collected long after the Conquest, and therefore written in the Norman tongue, not in the Saxon; and that the distich itself is not of the ancient Saxon, but of a puisne dialect used vulgarly since the Conquest. The charter of Beorredus examined. But because the Charter of Beorredus (produced by myself against myself) is more material for proof of Feuds among the Saxons, than all that is alleged to that purpose in the Report; First, in respect of the Antiquity thereof; then for that it nameth the word feodo expressly; and thirdly, for that it declareth certain lands to be de eodem feodo, as if there were many other Feods then in use: Give me leave (I beseech you) to examine this Charter yet more largely and particularly. It is therefore to be understood, that the elder Saxons made their ordinary conveyance of Lands, etc. without deed or writing, by delivery of a Turf or Spear, a Staff, an Arrow, or some other symbol, in token thereof. Yea their very Laws (like those of the Lacedæmonians called Rhetra) were unwritten; till Ethelbert their first Christian King, caused his own Laws to be put in writing about the year 605. (as other Western Nations in an age or two before had done) and as Bede saith, 1 Hist. Lib. 2. c. 5. wrote them in the Saxon tongue. The first Charter (if I shall so call it) or writing, touching lands and privileges, was (as a MS. of Canterbury reporteth) made by Withredus King of Kent in the year 694. and (as that Charter itself witnesseth) was appointed to be kept in the Church of our Saviour at Canterbury, as a precedent for posterity to imitate; and tho' it appeareth not there in what language it was written, yet I presume it was in the same with their Law, which was the Saxon tongue. For there be two copies of it extant in Latin, so differing the one from the other, as thereby they both appear to be translations. For proof thereof, the one of them useth the words Charta and Chartula, which Ingulfus affirmeth to be brought in hither by the Normans, that is, above three hundred years after the time of this Charter of Withred's. The other Latin copy termeth it Scriptum not Chartam; and the Saxons themselves used neither of those words, but called such writings in Latin Chirographos, not Chartas; as Ingulfus there also testifieth. So that it hereby appeareth, that the Prototype or first pattern of Charters which the Saxons imitated, was not in Latin but in Saxon. Saxon Charters in the Saxon tongu●. Secondly, it is therefore to be presumed (and very strongly) that tho' this Charter of Beorredus remaineth to us by a Latin copy, yet the original itself (like a thousand others) was in the Saxon tongue. Nor could it in all probability be otherwise; for at the very time when it was made, (viz. in anno 868.) learning was so generally subverted throughout England, by the barbarous Danes, that King Alfred (who began to reign within four years after the date thereof) saith, 2 Concil. Brit. p. 378. Paucissimi fuerunt cis Humbrum, qui vel preces suas communes sermone Anglico intelligere potuerant, vel scriptum aliquod è Latino transfer. Tam sane pauci fuerunt, ut ne unum quidem recordari possum ex australi parte Thamesis, tum cum ego regnare occaeperam. But as their original Charters were in the Saxon tongue; so in the Leiger-books in which they are preserved to us, they are often set down in the Saxon, and then (because the books themselves are in Latin) they are there translated also into Latin, and often times set down in the Latin only without the Saxon; as in the book of Ramsey-Abby, which having no Charters in it in the Saxon tongue, the Author of it saith, 1 In praesatione illius Libri. that himself had there translated them all into Latin, after that that Abbey in the days of King Stephen had recovered her liberty. Yet I deny not, that Latin Charters might be often used by their latter Clergymen, when learning (which in Beorred's time was utterly subverted) began at last to recover life again. Feudum not in use in Beorredus' days. Thirdly, (I conceive) that the word feudum or feodum was not in use in Beorredus' days, (viz. anno. 868.) For proof whereof, we are to consider the infancy, youth, and full age of the Feodal Law; for according to these several times, the Feodal Lands had their several denominations. First, they were called Munera, then Beneficia, and lastly Feuda (as is aforesaid.) Marculfus, who collected the Formulas (or Precedents as we call them) of Charters and Instruments of the time he lived in (which was under Clodovaeus II. King of France about the year 660.) maketh mention, in his first book of Munera, and in his second of Beneficia; but no where of Feuda: and he who a hundred years or more after him collected the Formula's incerti Autoris, speaketh divers times 2 Chap. 20. & 21. of Beneficium, but never nameth Feudum: for that this term came not into use till afterwards, when these Beneficia began to be granted in perpetuity. Beneficium Regis (saith 3 Ad Marcul●. p. 470. Bignonius) postea Feudum dictum est. And in another place he saith, 4 P. 550. Beneficii nomine ea praedia dicta (sunt)— quae Feuda posteritas dixit; initio namque vita accipientis finiebantur. As if he should say, they were called Beneficia when they were granted only for life of the Grantee; but were called Feuda when they began to be granted in perpetuity, and not before. Cujacius therefore speaking 5 Prooem ad lib. Feud. p. 7. of Feudatarii, which word came into use with Feudum, (for Relatives mutuo se ponunt & auferunt) saith, that when Actores, custodesque proediorum nostrorum temporarii, perpetui esse caeperunt, etc. when those who had the use and ordering of our Lands for a certain time, began to enjoy them in perpetuity, and yet retained their Latin name of Homines (our Men,) they grew then also to be called after new and foreign names, Vassalli, Leudes and Feudatarii, by the Princes and great Noblemen; who choosed rather to grant them lands in perpetuity, in consideration that they should do them military service. And he saith, that these names were first brought into Italy by the Germane Princes. Where (and particularly in Milan, as Merula reporteth) the Feodal Laws and Customs have had their original, and from thence been propagated throughout Europe. By this it appeareth, that the words Feudum and Feudatarii were not in use till that the word Munera was grown obsolete. Nor afterward, till Beneficia, leaving to be temporary or but for life, became to be perpetual possessions; which (as I have often said) was not long before the Conquest. So that the word Feudum could not be in use in Beorredus' time, who lived two hundred years before. Feuda and Beneficia. Fourthly, Tho' the word Feudum were in the original Charter of Beorredus, yet doth it not prove that our Feuds were then in use. For call them Beneficia or call them Feuda, certain it is that neither the one nor the other were then hereditary or perpetual, but either temporary or for life only; which at length begat the difference between Feuda and Beneficia, for Beneficia in a restrained sense began to signify no more than an estate for life, (in which sense it resteth at this day in our Clergy-men's Livings called Benefices) and the word Feuda grew to be understood only of such Beneficia or Benefices, as were perpetual and hereditary. To return from whence we digressed. I suppose it now appeareth sufficiently, how some Feodal words are crept into Charters and writings of Saxon date; and I think I may conclude, that the words before mentioned (Tenura, tenentes, tenementa, tenere or tenendum, in a feodal sense, or feodum itself) were not in use among them. Much less Tenure in Capite, Tenure by Knight-service, Tenure in Socage, or Frankalmoign; tho' the like services were performed to the Saxon Lordships, by their Thanes and Theodens, their Socmen or Husbandmen, and their Beadsmen or Clergymen, by way of contract for the lands received from them; as were after the Conquest to the Norman Lordships by way of Tenure, for lands holden of them. The Neapolitan and Sicilian Constitutions (which had their original from Princes of Norman lineage) 1 Lib. 1. Tit. 65. etc. do ..... the Conquest here in England 2 Lib. 3. Tit. 21. etc. make mention of tenens, tenere, tenementum and tenere de Rege in Capite; but whether the Normans carried these terms into Italy, when they Conquered Naples about the year 1031. 3 Norm. Reform. p. 4. or brought them from thence into Normandy, I cannot determine. Certain it is, that from the Normans they came to us in England; for being not met with before in any authentic Author, we presently after the Conquest begin to hear of them, even about the third or fourth year of the Conqueror's reign, as appeareth 4 In Gul. Rege. by his Charter of Emendationes Legum in the Red book of the Exchequer, f. 162. b. and in Lambard's Archaionomia. CHAP. IU. Of Tenors in Capite, more particularly. No Tenors in Capite among the Saxons. TOuching Tenors therefore in Capite, I think I may boldly say, that here were none in England in the Saxons time, after the manner now in use among us. First, For that their Feodal Lands (as we have showed) were not descendible before the Conquest. For tho' there were hla●ord and ðane amongst the Saxons, that is, Lord and Thane, or Servitor, whom beyond the Seas they called Seigneur & Vassal, alias Vassallum, Dominum & Clientem, while their feuds were arbitrable or but for years or life; yet grew not the words of tenure into use, till that Feuds became descendable to posterities, and thereby obliged the whole succession of heirs to depend and hold upon their Capital Lords by the services imposed at the creation of that Feud. Secondly, The word in Capite is like a Relative in Logic; which being a supreme degree of itself, implieth some other degrees to be under it, as Tenant in medio or Tenant in imo, or both, viz. Tenant in Capite, Tenant in menalty, and Tenant Paravale, or at least Tenant in Capite and Tenant Paravale, which inferior Tenants could not be in the Saxons time, for that the granting of Feuds in perpetuity (out of which the under-Tenancies must be deduced) was (as I have said) not yet in use. Tenure in Capite of two sorts. Thirdly, to hold in Capite is of two sorts, The one general, which is of the King, as Caput regni & caput generalissimum omnium Feodorum, the fountain whence all feuds and tenors have their main original. The other special or subaltern, which is of a particular subject, as Caput feudi or terrae illius, so called because he was the first that created and granted that feud or land in that manner of tenure, wherein it standeth, and is therefore at this day so to be understood by the ordinary words (in our Deeds) of tenendum de Capitalibus Dominis feodi illius, etc. signifying that the lands so granted (since the statute of Quia Emptores terrarum) must now be holden mediately or immediately of him or his heirs or assigns, that was Caput Feodi, the first that created or granted that Feud in that tenure, who thereupon was called Capitalis Dominus & Caput terrae illius; among the Feudists Capitanus feudi illius▪ And the Grantee and his heirs were said to be Tenants in Capite, because they held immediately of him that first granted that feud or land in that manner. Hereupon David I. King of Scots and Earl of Huntingdon here in England, was in right of his Earldom (in the time of King Henry I.) said to be Capud terrae de Crancfeld & Crawl post regem Angliae 1 Lib. Ramsey f. 42. d. §. 279. . And Roger de Molbray about the same time or shortly after, made a grant in these words: Roger de Molbray omnibus hominibus & fidelibus suis Normannis & Anglis salutem. Sciatis quod ego concessi Roberto de Ardenna Clerico amico meo totum nemus de Bedericheslea cum omnibus antiquis libertatibus & consuetudinibus ejusdem nemoris ad tenendum de me in Capite & haeredibus meis ita libere & quiet, etc. sicut ego unquam, etc. The Deed is without date; but note that the direction of it is Omnibus hominibus fidelibus suis Normannis & Anglis, which implieth that it was made before Henry II's time: for he being of Anjou in France and bringing in Frenchmen with him, altered then very properly the directions of Charters into Hominibus & fidelibus suis Francis & Anglis. Yet I find the same direction, tho' more improperly, to be some time used under the Norman Kings. Qu. So likewise (as before) W. Marshal the great Earl of Pembrock, in a Charter of his, useth these words about the beginning of Henry iii time (as I take it:) Nisi fortè forinseca tenementa tenueris de me (in) Capite. And 2 Pap. 157. Mat. Paris in An. 1250. making mention of one G. a Knight, saith, that Rex memoratus (Hen. III.) cuidam militi tenenti de Ecclesia S. Albani in Capite, etc. warennam concessit: where the words tenenti de Ecclesia S. Albani in Capite, do signify, that some Abbot of the Church of St. Alban first created and granted that Feud. Having thus in general manner prepared my way to the ensuing discourse, I shall now (God willing) by the patience of them whom it most concerneth, examine such particular assertions, as are produced in the Report, either to prove our Tenors and Feuds with their dependencies, to have been in use among the Saxons, or to disprove what I have affirmed in my Glossary, or in the Chapters here precedent, and will first show therein as followeth. CHAP. V. What degrees and distinction of persons were among the Saxons, and of what condition their lands were. Distinction of persons among the Saxons. FOr the better understanding of our discourse, it is necessary that we should show what degrees and distinctions of persons were among the Saxons, and of what condition their lands were. Touching their persons, they are by themselves divided in this manner, Eorle and Ceorl and Ðegn and Ðeoden. In Latin Comes and Villanus, Tainus [unus] & alius, singuli pro modo suo. That is to say, the Earl and the Husbandman, the Thane of the greater sort called the King's Thane, and the Thane of the lesser sort called the Theoden or Vnderthane. More degrees the Saxons had not in their Laity, and among these must all the tenors lie that were in use with them. As for their bondmen (whom they called Theowes and Esnes) they were not counted members of that Commonwealth, but parcels of their Master's goods and substance. Lands among the Saxons. Bocland. Touching lands among the Saxons they were of two sorts, Bocland and Folcland. Bocland signifieth terram codicillarem or librariam, Charter-lands: for the Saxons called a Deed or Charter an bec, i. e. librum, a book; and this properly was their terra haereditaria: for it commonly carried with it the absolute inheritance and propriety of the Land, and was therefore preserved in writing, and possessed by the Thanes and Nobler sort, as proedium nobile, liberum & immune a servitiis vulgaribus & servilibus. In which respect the Thanes themselves were also called liberales, as appeareth 1 Vid. Gloss. in Verb. Foresta. by Canute's Forest-laws (Art. 1. 3. & seqq.) a name not well agreeing with Feodal servitudes. But it seemeth by divers Abby-books, that some Estates for life, which we call Frank tenements, were also put in writing, especially among the latter Saxons. Yet were not these accounted bocland; for they were laden commonly with many feodal and ministerial services, whereas bocland (as I said) was free from all services not holden of any Lord, the very same that Allodium; descendable (according to the common course of Nations and of Nature) unto all the sons, and therefore called Gavelkind, not restrained to the eldest son (as feodal lands were not at first) but devisable also by will, and thereupon called Terrae testamentales, as the Thane that possessed them was said to be testamento dignus. Folcland. Folcland was terra vulgi, the land of the vulgar people, who had no estate therein, but held the same (under such rents and services as were accustomed or agreed of) at the will only of their Lord the Thane; and it was therefore not put in writing, but accounted proedium rusticum & ignobile. But both the greater and the lesser Thanes, which possessed Bocland or hereditary lands, divided them according to the proportion of their estates Inland. into two sorts; i e. into Inland and Outland. 2 Ing. Sax. p. 864. The Inland was that which lay next or most convenient for the Lord's Mansion-house, as within the view thereof, and therefore they kept that part in their own hands for supportation of their family and Hospitality. The Normans afterwards called these lands terras dominicales, the Demains or Lord's lands: The Germans, terras indominicatas, lands in the Lord's own use: The Feudists, terras curtiles or intra curtem, lands appropriate to the Court or House of the Lord. Outland. Outland was that which lay beyond or out from among the Inlands or Demeans, and was not granted out to any Tenant hereditarily, but, like our Copy-holds of ancient time (having their original from thence) merely at the pleasure of the Lord. Cujacius 3 Praef. ad libr. Fend. p. 12. speaking of this kind of land, calleth it proprium feudum, that is to say, such land as was properly assigned for Feodal lands. Proprium feudum est (saith he) extra curtem, & consistit in praediis. As if he should say, That land properly is a Feud or Feudal land, which lieth without the Demains of the Manor, and consisteth in land not in houses. We now call this Outland the Tenant's land or the Tenancy, and so it is translated out of Biritrick's will in the Saxon tongue 4 Itinerar. Cant. p. 495. . This Outland they subdivided into two parts; whereof one part they disposed among such as attended on their persons either in war or peace, (called Theodens or lesser Thanes) after the manner of Knights Fees; but much differing from them of our time, as by that which followeth shall appear. The other part they allotted to their Husbandmen, whom they termed Ceorls (that is Carls or Churls.) And of them we shall speak farther by and by, when we consider all the degrees aforesaid; beginning with the Earl. CHAP. VI Of Earls among our Saxons. Earl no title of dignity anciently. AN Earl, in the signification of Comes, was not originally a degree of dignity, as it is with us at this day; but of Office and Judicature in some City or portion of the Country, circumscribed anciently with the bounds of the Bishopric of that Diocese; for that the Bishop and the Earl then sat together in one Court, and heard jointly the causes of Church and Commonwealth, as they yet do in Parliament. But in process of time the Earl grew to have the government commonly of the chief City and Castle of his Territory, and withal a third part of the King's profits arising by the Courts of Justice (Fines, Forfeitures, Escheats, etc.) annexed to the office of his Earldom. Yet all this not otherwise than at the pleasure of the King; which commonly was upon good behaviour, and but during life at most. This is apparent by the severe injunction of King Alfred the Great (labouring 1 Asser. de gest. Alfredi p. 21. to plant literature and knowledge amongst the ignorant Earls and Sheriffs of his Kingdom) imposed upon them, That they should forthwith in all diligence apply themselves to the study of wisdom and knowledge, or else forgo their Office. Herewith (saith Asser Menevensis who lived at that time and was great with the King) the Earls and Sheriffs were so affrighted that they rather choose insuetam disciplinam quam laboriose discere, quam potestatum ministeria dimittere, that is, To go at last to the School of knowledge, how painful soever, rather than to lose their offices of Authority, and degrees of Honour; which Alfred there also declareth, that they had not by Inheritance, but by God's gift and his; Dei (saith he 2 Ibid. ) dono & meo, sapientium ministeria & gradus usurpatis. This is manifest by divers other authorities and examples in my Glossary (in verbo Comes) as the Reader, if he please, may there see. No Earldoms hereditary. Some conjecture, that Deira and Bernicia in Northumberland, and Mercia in the midst of England, were Feudal and hereditary Earldoms in the Saxon times. Those of Northumberland presently after their first arrival under Hengistus, about the year 447. that of Mercia by the gift of Alfred the Great (about the year 900.) to Ethelredus, a man of power, in way of marriage with his daughter Ethelfleda: but for aught I see it is neither proved by the succession of those Earldoms, nor our Authors of Antiquity. For my own part, I think it not strange, that there was not at the entry of the Saxons a Feudal and Hereditary Earldom in all Christendom. As for this our Britain, the misery of it than was such, as it rather seemed an Anarchy and Chaos, than in any form of Government. Little better even in Alfred's days, through the fury of the Danes; tho' he at last subdued them for his time. How soever three or four examples in five hundred years before the Conquest differing from the common use, is no inference to overthrow it, especially in times unsettled and tumultuous. The noble Earldom of Arundel in our days of peace, differeth in constitution from all the other Earldoms of England; yet that impeacheth not their common manner of succession. Earldoms in France. Loyseau 3 Loyseau ●e Seignier. c. 5. p. 106. lin. ●lt. and Pasquier, learned Frenchmen, speaking of the Dukes and Earls of France, which England ordinarily followeth (and sometimes too near the heels) justify at large what I have said; showing the Dukes and Earls in the Roman Empire (from whose example others every where were derived) were like the Proconsul's and Precedents of Provinces, simple Officers, who for their entertainment had nothing else but certain rights and customs raised from the people (which we in England called Tertium denarium.) And that the Dukes and Earls of France were Officers in like manner, but had the signory of their territory annexed to their Office: so that they were Officers and Vassals both at once, (that is to say) Officers by way of Judicature, and Vassals (whom we call Feodal tenants) for their Seignories of Dukedoms and Earldoms. But (say they) tenue neant moiens en fief a vie, etc. holden notwithstanding as a fief for life, not hereditary nor patrimonial in the beginning, as afterward they were. This change they assign to have been begun about the end of the first line of their Kings; who being at that time weak and simple men, the Dukes and Earls took opportunity to make their Estates hereditary. But it continued not long; for the first Kings of the second line reduced them presently to conformity. Yet some there were in the remote Provinces, that maintained themselves hereditary in despite of the Kings, whereupon ensued many wars. Thus far both these Authors do concur, and then Loyseau addeth further, That at the end of the second line, Hugh Capet having made himself King of France, permitted all to hold their Dukedoms, Earldoms, and Seigneuries hereditarily; and taking homage of them as of hereditary Fiefs, each party obliged themselves to support the other and their posterity in those dignities as hereditarily. This happened in France a little before the Conquest of England, and from this precedent of Hugh Capet's did our William the Conqueror make the Earldoms and Feuds in England first hereditary, as we have already showed in the second Chapter. So that I conclude (as I assumed in the beginning) that the Saxon Earldoms were not hereditary, nor otherwise Feodal (if we shall so term them) than for life, whereon neither Wardship, nor Marriage, etc. could depend. Yet I confess that the Dukes and Earls of the Saxon times both had and might have great possessions in other lands as patrimonial and hereditary, namely their Thaneland: and in what condition they possessed them, it shall appear anon, when we come to speak more at large of Thanes and Thanelands. CHAP. VII. Of Ceorls; and that they were ordinarily but as Tenants at will, or having lands held not by Knight-service. Ceorls. THe division before mentioned, which the Saxons made of their own degrees, leadeth me in this next place (tho' not orderly) to speak of the Ceorle (that is of the Carl or Churl) and Husbandman. The Ancients called him in Latin Villanus, not as we ordinarily take it for a Bondman, but for him that dwelling in a Village or Country Town, lived by the Country course of Husbandry. Mr. Lambard therefore (to decline the misconceiving of the word Villanus) doth render it in the Saxon laws by Paganus, which signifieth the same that Villanus doth, according to the French for a Villager, but not according to our English for a Bondman. Our Saxons otherwhile did term them, like the Dutchmen, Boors, that is, such as live by tilth or grazing, and by works of husbandry. Such were the Ceorls among the Saxons; but of two sorts, one that hired the Lord's Outland or Tenementary land (called also the Folcland) like our Farmers: the other that tilled and manured his Inland or Demeans, (yielding operam not censum, work and not rend) and were thereupon called his Socmen or Ploughman. These, no doubt, were oftentimes his very Bondmen; I therefore shall not meddle with them, but will hold me to the first sort, who having ordinarily no lands of their own, lived upon the Outlands before mentioned of their Lord the Thane, as custumary Tenants at his will, (after the usual manner of that time) rendering unto him a certain portion of victuals, and things necessary for Hospitality. This rent or retribution they called Feorme, but the word in the Saxon signifieth meat or victuals▪ and tho' we have ever since Henry II's time, changed this reservation of victuals into money, yet in letting our lands, we still retain the name of Fearms and Fearmers unto this day. The quantity of the Fearme or rent for every ploughland, seemeth in those times to have been certain in every Country, according to the nature of the place. King Ina in his 1 Cap. 70. laws did make it so through all the territory of the Westsaxons, as you may see (with much more touching this matter) in my Glossary, verbo Firma. Ceorls. But insomuch as the chiefest part of the fruit and profits of the lands thus manured by the Ceorls or Husbandmen, redounded to the benefit of their Lords and not of the Ceorls themselves; the Romans counted them to be as bondmen and not freemen. Caesar therefore speaking of them while they were yet in Germany, 2 P. 116. saith, Plebs pene servorum habebatur loco: That their common people were in a manner bondmen. And Tacitus to the same purpose, 3 De Mor. Germ. p. 132. Caeteris servis (meaning these Ceorls or Husbandmen) non in nostrum morem descriptis per familiam ministeriis utuntur; suam quisque sedem, suos penates regit. Frumenti modum Dominus aut pecoris aut vestis, ut colono, injungit. Et servus hactenus paret. But this service was no bondage. For the Ceorl or Husbandman might as well leave this land at his will, as the Lord might put him from it at his will: and therefore it was provided by the laws of Ina 4 Cap. 65. in what manner he should leave the land when he departed from it to another place. And the Writ of Waste in Fitz-Herbert 5 Fol. 55. C. seemeth to show that they might depart if they were not then well used. It is apparent also that the Ceorl was of free condition, for that his person was valued as a member of the Commonwealth in the laws of Aethelstan 6 Cap. de Weregild▪ , and his least valuation is there reckoned to be 200s. whereas the Bondman was not valued at all, for that he was not (as I said) any part of the Commonwealth, but of his Master's substance: nor was he capable of any public office. But the Ceorl (tho' he had no land) might rise to be the leader of his Countrymen, and to use the armour of a Thane or Knight 7 Ll. Aethelst. ibid. , viz. an Helmet, an Habergeon, and a gilt Sword. And if his wealth so increased as that he became owner of five hides of land, the valuation of his person (which they called his Were or Weregild) was increased to two thousand thrimsas, that is six thousand shillings, and being then also adorned with other marks of dignity, he was counted for a Thane; as you shall see in the next Chapter. Earls capable of Knight's-Fees. But (for all this) a Ceorl or Husbandman (tho' he were a Freeman) was not by the Feodal law of that and later times, capable of a Knights-fee, or land holden by military service; and therefore what land soever he purchased, was to be intended land of no such tenure. And it appeareth further by the laws of Aethelstan, that the five hides of land (before mentioned) purchased by the Ceorl, were descendable to his posterity; which showeth also that they were not feodal land, for that feuds at that time were not here descendable, as we have often declared. So that I hope I may conclude, that the Ceorls or Husbandmen among the Saxons held no land by our tenure of Knight-service. CHAP. VIII. Of Thanes, and their several kinds. SEeing then the weight of the question will rest wholly upon the Thanes, we must consider them the more diligently, first in the quality of their persons, secondly in the tenure of their lands. Thane, what. A Thane was (in like manner as the Earl) not properly a title of dignity, but of service: so called in the Saxon of ●enian servire, and in Latin Minister à ministrando. But as there be many degrees of service, some of greater estimation and some of less; so those that served the King in places of eminency, either in Court or Commonwealth, were called Thani majores and Thani Regis; and those that served under them in like manner as under Dukes, Earls, and other great Officers of the Kingdom, and also under Bishops, Abbats, and the greater Prelates of the Church, were called Thani minores, or the lesser Thanes. And as the titles of honourable office and service in Dukes, Earls, etc. became at length to be made hereditary; so this of Thanes, like our titles of Noblemen and Gentlemen, descended at last with their Father's land upon their Children and posterity. And continued thus till after the Conquest, as appears by some Writs and Charters of the Conqueror. Th● quality of Thanes. Buchanan 1 Hist. Se●●. Lib. 6. describing the quality of their persons, calleth them, Praefectos regionum sive Nomarchas & Quaestores rerum capitalium, Governors of places, principal Ministers of justice, Chequer men, Sheriffs, etc. But we will take them as the Saxons themselves describe them in the place before mentioned, where it thus followeth, give Ceorl geðeah ꝧ he hefde fullice fif hyda agenes land, etc. if a churl or husbandman thrive, so that he had fully five hides of his own land, a Church and a Kitchen, a Bellhouse, and a Gatehouse, a seat and a several office in the King's Hall; then he was from thenceforth worthy of the rights of a Thane: meaning (as I understand it) he was then one of the greater Thanes or King's Thanes. For the lesser Thane is by and by described also in that which followeth, viz. And give ðegen geðeah, etc. And if a Thane himself so prospered that he served the King, and rid upon his message as others of his Court, and then had a Thane (i. e. an under or lesser Thane) that followed him, which had five hides (or ploughland) chargeable to the King's expedition, and served his Lord in the King's Court, and had gone thrice upon his errand to the King: he (this under-Thane) might take an oath instead of his Lord, and at any great need supply the place of his Lord. And if a Thane did so thrive as he became an Earl, he had the rights of an Earl. And a Merchant might become a Thane, etc. Mr. Lambard 2 It●n. Cant. p. 502. conceiveth this place to discover but three degrees among the Saxons, viz. Earls, Thanes and Ceorls, not admitting the under-Thane to be a several degree. The words seem otherwise, and the Saxon division before recited maketh four degrees, Earl, Ceorl, Thegn and Theoden or under Thane. Some therefore distinguish Thanes into majores and minores, some into majores, minores (otherwise called mediocres) and minimi, whom Canutus in his Forest-laws calleth Minuti and Tinemen. I dare not venture to define them particularly, but will rest upon the Saxon division first mentioned, which I find to be pursued by Norman terms in the laws of Edw. Confess. and William Conq. delivered by Ingulfus, viz. Count, Baron, Valvasor, and Villain. Where he placeth Count instead of Earl, Baron instead of Kings-Thane, Valvasor instead of Theoden or lesser Thane, and lastly Villain instead of Churl. As though the division both of the Saxon and Norman times did hold analogy one with the other, and both of them with ours at this day, viz. of Earls and Barons of the Kingdom, including the greater Nobility, Barons of Towns and Manors (including the lesser Nobility or Gentry) and that of our Yeomen including the Husbandmen. To return to the Thanes. This Saxon passage hath per transennam showed unto us, not only the quality of their person, but the nature of their land, whereupon all our Question doth depend. And true it is, it showeth that both they and it were subject to military service, called in Latin Expeditio, in Saxon utfare and ferdgung, and in foreign Nations Heribannum, that is the calling forth of an Army. And it appeareth by an ancient MS. of Saxon Laws in the King's Library, that the Thanes were not only tied to this, but to many other services to be done unto the King, and that in respect of their land, which notwithstanding bred no Tenure in Capite or by Knights-service. The words be these, 1 Cap. de dignitate hominum f. 163. Tbani lex est, ut sit dignus rectitudine testamenti sui, & ut tria faciat pro terra sua, Expeditionem, Burghbotam & Brugbotam, & de multis terris majus Landirectum. Exurgit ad Bannum Regis, sicut est Deorhege, ad mansionem regiam, & Sceorpum in hosticum, & custodiam maris, & capitis, & pacis, & Elmesfeoh, & Ciricsetum, i. e. pecunia Eleemosynae, & Ciricsceatum, & aliae res. Thus in English. The Law touching a Thane is; That he have power to make a will, and that in respect of his land he shall do three things, viz. Military Expedition, Repairing of Castles, and mending of Bridges, and for more lands to do more Land-duties. To go forth upon the King's summons to the enclosing of his Park and Mansion-house, and to * Sceorp, vestitus, apparatus Somn. ..... into the enemy's Lands, and to defend the Sea, his own head, and the peace, to pay Alms-monies, Church-seeds, Church-shots, and other things. What is there in all this to show either a Tenure in capite or by Knight-service? It will be said that the Military Expediton, and Warding of the Sea against enemies, imply a tenure by Knight-service, and that those and the other services being to be performed to the King, (and upon the King's summons) show a Tenure in capite. And no doubt, so would it be for lands given in this manner by the King since the Conquest. But I conceive that none of all this riseth out of any Tenure, or Feodal reservation made by the Saxon Kings in granting these lands, or by any particular contract agreed of by the Thane or Subject in accepting them, but out of a fundamental law or custom of the Kingdom, (as ancient as the Kingdom itself) whereby all the land of the whole Kingdom was obliged to this Trinodae necessitati, of military The three services upon Lands Expedition, and building or repairing of Castles and Bridges; so that if this made a tenure by Knight-service in Capite in the Thane Lands, then must it follow also, that all the land of the Kingdom was likewise holden by Knights-service in capite: for it was wholly tied to those three services, as appeareth in the Council of Eanham, (Cap. 22. 23 2 Conc. Brit. sub An. 1009. p. 520. .) where they are commanded to be yearly done. And by the laws of Canutus (Cap. 10. 62.) where they are appointed to be done as necessity requireth. And also by the law of King Ethelred, who about the thirtieth year of his reign, ordained, that every 3 al. 9 eight hides or ploughland through the whole Kingdom, shall find a man with a Crosset and Helmet to the Naval Expedition. And every three hundred and ten plough-lands, an ordinary ship. For these purposes, Triremem. was the whole Land formerly divided, either by Alfred the great or some other precedent King, into 243600. hides or plough-lands, and according to this division were the military and other charges of the Kingdom imposed and proportioned, without ever any mention of Tenors in ●●●ite or by Knight-service. Hence it rose that the Saxon Kings in granting o● lands, liberties, and privileges unto Ecclesiastical persons and others, were usually so careful in reserving Expedition, Burghbote and Brigbote, as you may see in the Charters of King Withered 1 Con. Brit. p. ... , Ina 2 P. 227. , Aethelbald 3 P. 256. , Aethelwulph 4 P. 349. , Edgar 5 P. 433. , etc. in the Britain Councils, as also in the Charters here following, and in a multitude of others elsewhere besides. Neither did this Military Expedition otherwise at that time bind the Saxons to a Tenure in capite or Knight-service, than it doth us at this day in the Naval Expedition lately now revived. 〈…〉 not subject to 〈…〉 For better manifestation that Thanelands were subject to no feudal service, consider, I pray you, the words of the Saxon passage before mentioned, where it is said that a Thane must have three hides at least of his agenes land, i. e. of his own land, not terrae emphiteuticariae, or precariae, not usu-fructuariae, or feodatariae, but as a Latin copy hath it terrae suae propriae, where the word propriae carrieth another sense than is ordinarily conceived, as to signify in this place, land wherein no other man hath any interest by feodal superiority or dominion, but whereof himself hath meram proprietatem, the sole and absolute propriety; even the same Alodium that is spoken of in the Report 6 P. 29. , and which no man hath or can have now at this day, but the King's land holden of no man in the feodal sense, (for the phrase of tenure was not then in use amongst the Saxons) nor tied any man to do any feodal service. Another old Latin MS. therefore reciteth the same Saxon passage in these words, Si villanus (so they at that time called a Husbandman) ita crevisset sua probitate, quod pleniter haberet quinque hidas de suo proprio alodio, etc. dignus erat honore Liberalitatis, quod Angli dicunt Ðanescipes surðe: si autem liberalis homo, 1. Ðegen [Thanus] ita profecisset ut Regi servisset, & vice sua equitaret in Missatico Regis, hic talis si haberet alium [Thanum] sub se, qui ad expeditionem Regis quinque hidas teneret & in Aula Regis domino suo servisset, etc. Here I must say with Cujacius 7 Lib. 2. Tit. 27. p. 166. , speaking of the Author of the second Book of Feuds: Proprietatem [alias] vocat quod hic Alodium: Noting thereby that Proprieta● and Alodium are synonimas, signifying land free from all feodal service and holden of no body. Yet in that sense Alodium is here said to be Terra ad expeditionem Regis, land obliged to the warfare of the King. I must note also by the way, that he that thus translated the Saxon passage by the words, qui ad expeditionem Regis quinque hidas teneret, followed the manner which before we spoke of, in rendering Saxon customs by Norman phrases. The Reader perhaps will here understand teneret in the feodal sense, for to hold of his Lord, whereas in the Saxon book the words are no otherwise than give he he●de, i. e. if he had five hides of land, so that teneret here is no otherwise to be taken than for possideret. To return to our purpose. Thaneland might no doubt be tied to do Military service or Knight-service, and yet not holden in capite or by Knight-service; for it is one thing to hold by Knight-service, and another to be tied to do it. No man holdeth, that hath not tenementum or tenementale quiddam: But a man might be tied to do this military expedition for his personal estate (tho' he had no land) or for his very person itself, as appeareth by the laws of King Ina, Cap. 52. where it is said give se siðcundman, etc. If the Sithcundman having land forbeareth to go the Expedition, he shall forfeit his land and 120s. and if he have no land yet he shall forfeit 60s. and an Husbandman (who if he had land was but Tenant in Socage according to our Law) 30s. It appeareth also by many Charters of the Saxon Kings that Thane lands were not feodal, and that the military Expedition mde no Tenure by Knight-service. Give me leave therefore to produce some of them, that you may see thereby the use of those times, and what the Kings themselves conceived therein. CHAP. IX. Charters of Thanelands granted by Saxon Kings, not only without mention of Tenure or Feodal service, but with all Immunity, except Expedition, etc. Eadwigus EGO Eadwigh Monarchiam totius Britanniae Insulae cum superno juvamine obtinens, cuidam meo fideli Ministro, vocitato nomine Aelfwine, duas mansas & dimidiam tribuo perenniter illic ubi antiquorum hominum relatu nominatur at Schylfhinghatune, habeat quam diu vivat, & post cui voluerit impertiat, cum his rebus quae sibi rite pertinent tamburlaine in magnis quam in minimis. Sit haec donatio immunis a servitute mundana, excepto illo labour, qui communis omni populo videtur esse (not naming Expeditione, etc. but concluding) Si quis augeat, augeatur. Si quis minuat, careat praemio aeterno, etc. So that here he was freed a servitute mundana both great and small, that was incident or inherent to the land by way of Tenure, and yet he was chargeable to military Expedition, and to the repairing of Bridges, Castles, Burroughs, and Fortifications, but that not otherwise than as all the land of the Kingdom was charged, (as before we have showed). Edgarus. Regnante in perpetuum Domino nostro, etc. Ego Eadgarus Rex Anglorum, caeterarumque gentium in circuitu persistentium gubernator & rector, cuidam fideli meo Ministro vocato nomine Alur. modicam muniminis mei partem Terrae, i. e. in Dorset. & tres perticas in illo loco, ubi Anglica appellatione dicitur at Lonk, ut habeat ac possideat quamdiu vivat, & post se unum haeredem, quicunque sibi placuerit, derelinquat. Sit hoc praedictum rus liberum ab omni malorum obstaculo cum omnibus ad rus rite pertinentibus, campis, pascuis, pratis, sylvis; Excepto communi labour, Expeditione, pontis & arcis constructione. Si quis vero hominum hanc meam Donationem cum stultitiae temeritate jactando infringere tentaverit, sit ipse gravibus per colla depressis catenis inter flamivomes tetrorum doemonum catervas, nisi prius ad satisfactionem emendare voluerit. Istis terminis haec tellus ambita videtur: Ðis is þe landgemark at Lonk, etc. Haec charta scripta est Anno Dominicae Incarnationis, 958. Ethelredus. 1 MS. Mon. de Hyde sub tit. R. Ethelredi. Mundi denique status Christi moderatoris disponente, etc. Ego Ethelredus totius Albionis Basileus, cuidam mihi obsequentium Aethelwoldo vocitatione, pro ejus placabili Obsequio quandam terrae particulam, i. e. decem manentia in loco quem coloni Maningforde appellant in perpetuam concedo haereditatem, quatenus ille bene perfruatur ac prospere possideat quamdiu presenti fruitur vita, & post vitae suae terminum cuicunque sibi placuerit haeredi derelinquat. Sit autem praesata terra liberrima ab omni munduali obstaculo, cum omnibus ad eam pertinentibus in campis & pascuis pratisque ac cursibus aquarum, tribus tantummodo causis exceptis, i. e. Expeditione, pontis arcisve restauratione. Si quis autem hanc donationem pervertere studuerit, perpetuae maledictionis incurrat reatum, & gehennae aeternum sustineat incendium nisi mortis ante exitum hanc praesumptionem emendare curaverit. Istis terminis ambitur praefata tellus Ærst of eastreƿeardan, etc. So King Ethelred in the Charter to his Thane Sealwyne, granteth five cassatoes in Readdn, cum omnibus, etc. cuicunque sibi libuerit cleronomo direlinquat haereditate, etc. Sit autem istud praefatum rus liberrimum ab omni mundali obstaculo in magnis ac modicis, campis, pascuis, pratis; tribus tantummodo rationabiliter rebus exceptis quae 2 Sic Ed. Conf. in chart. fact. Orco Minist. 7. usuali ritu observantur, i. e. cum glomerata sibi expeditioni compulerit populari commilitonum confligere castra, atque cum sua petivit pontis titubantia muniri vada: ac cum concinni turma urbium indigent muniri stabiliter septa, etc. Dat. anno Dominicae incarnate. 1014. Indict. 12. 〈◊〉 1 MS de Abb. ub. Chart. 2. In nomine Dei almi & agiae Sophiae, etc. Idcirco ego Cnute Rex, Anglorum gubernator & rector, quandam ruris portionem, decem & septem viz. terrae mansas illo in loco ubi jamdudum solicolae illius regionis nomen imposuerunt at Abbodesbury meo fideli Ministro, quem notis affines Orc appellare solent, in perpetuam confirmo haereditatem quatenus ille bene perfruatur ac perpetualiter possideat quamdiu Deus per suam ineffabilem misericordiam vitam illi & vitalem spiritum concedere voluerit, deinde namque sibi succedenti cuicunque voluerit cleronomi jure haereditario derelinquat, ceu supra diximus in aeternam haereditatem. Maneat igitur hoc nostrum donum immobile aeterna libertate jocundum cum universis quae ad eundem locum pertinere dinoscuntur tam in magnis quam in modicis rebus, in campis, pascuis, pratis, rivulis, silvis, aquarumque cursibus. Excepto communi labore quod omnibus liquide patet, viz. Expeditione, pontis constructione, arcisve munitione. Si quis autem, etc. Edward Confess. And King Edward the Confessor granting duas mansas & dimidiam in Wudeton, etc. to Thola (widow of the foresaid Orc, whom in a Saxon Charter he calleth his Man, that is his Thane) saith thus: In aeternam haereditatem concedo quatenus illa habeat & perpetualiter possideat hanc meam regalem donationem quamdiu vivat, & post obitum suum cuicunque voluerit haeredi relinquat. Sit autem praefatum rus liberum ab omni seculari gravedine tam in magnis quam in modicis rebus, in campis, pascuis, pratis, silvis, aquarumque decursibus; tribus exceptis quae omnibus hominibus communia sunt, viz. Expeditione, pontis, arcisve restauratione. After all these, I will yet add one other of King Eadgar's, having somewhat of note above the rest, as anon we shall observe. It was made to the new Monastery of Hide near Winchester in these words. Edgar. 2 Lib. MS. ejusd. Monast. sub Tit. Edgar Chart. ult. Annuente altitoni moderatoris imperio, etc. Ego Edgar totius Britanniae basileus quasdam villas ut nominantur, Dunketone habens quinque hidas terrae & Ecclesiam, Sueyse cum 28. hydis terrae, etc. Concedo in puram & perpetuam eleemosynam novae Wintoniensi Ecclesiae beato Petro Apostolorum principi dicatae, etc. cum omnibus utensilibus, pratis, viz. pascuis, rivulis, aeterna largita sint haereditate, etc. Sint autem praedictae villae, rus, mansiones, terrae, rivuli, omni terrenae servitutis jugo liberae imperpetuum, tribus exceptis, Rata viz. Expeditione, pontis arcisve restauratione. Si quis autem hanc nostram donationem in aliud quam constituimus transferre voluerit, privatus consortio Sanctae Dei Ecclesiae, aeternis baratri incendiis, etc. puniatur, etc. Whatsoever the phrase be in the Saxon original, (for I take this to be a translation of the Norman time) it here maketh the lands to be given in Franckalmoign, but without mention of Tenendum, and yet showeth that they were tied to Expedition, etc. Yea, and calleth it notwithstanding puram Eleemosynam, whereas tho' in libera Eleemosyna a rent in old deeds hath sometime been reserved, yet can it not be called pura, if any rent or service at all were reserved to the Donor. I have recited these Charters the more at large for that they apparently discover by many reasons (which we shall set forth in the next Chapter) that the Thanes possessed not their Thanelands either by any feodal service or by way of Tenure. CHAP. X. Observations upon the precedent Charters, showing that the Thanelands or Expedition were not feodal or did lie in Tenure. THese Charters present unto us the general manner of granting and possessing of Thaneland among the Saxons during the time of their Monarchy, till the very coming of the Normans. And there is to be observed in them (as in other before mentioned) what hereafter followeth. Thane has no direct relation to war. First, That the word Thane which is here and usually interpreted Minister, (that is an officer or servant, of ðenian servire) noteth nothing belonging properly to the war, and is not therefore to be understood as Bracton fancieth the word Barones to be quasi robur belli, or to import any matter either of Feodal service or of Tenure. No mention of tenere, etc. Secondly, That (as we have formerly observed upon other Charters) so there is not in any of these now produced, one word either of Tenure or of Feodal signification, which presently after the Conquest became innumerable, as brought in by the Conqueror. Yet well may it be, that Edward the Confessor (having his education in Normandy) might (as travellers use to do) bring some Norman words and manners into England. What used instead of Tenere. Thirdly, That instead of tenere and tenendum (by which the Norman feudists implied a Clientary if not servile dependence, that the Tenant hath upon the Lord) the Saxons used habeat, possideat, fruatur, or perfruatur (and elsewhere gaudeat) words of freedom and immunity. So likewise for tenementa (signifying things holden of a superior proprietary) they used mansas, manentia, and mansiones à manendo, (as places of abode) or casatas à casa, for a dwellinghouse, otherwise called hyda, quasi tectum à tegendo, including under these names all the lands that belonged thereunto. And those that dwelled upon those mansas, etc. they called not tenentes (holder's) as we do, but manentes, as persons abiding there. All the foresaid words being of the middle-age-dialect, not appropriated to the feodal language. The occasion of granting Thanelands. Fourthly, In granting of feuds and feud lands, the consideration is always for matter de futuro, as pro homagio & servitio habendo. But here in granting these Thanelands, the consideration is for service past or present, signified by the quality of the Thane, as fideli ministro meo, or pro placabili obsequio, not only without reservation of any future service, but with express immunity from all services: as, to use the words of the Charters themselves, 1. ut sint libera vel immunia à servitute mundana. 2. Ab omni malorum obstaculo. 3. Liberrima ab omni munduali obstaculo. 4. Liberrimum ab omni munduali obstaculo in magnis & modicis. 5. Aeterna libertate jocundum. 6. Liberum ab omni seculari gravedine. Such was the freedom of these Thanelands, equal and no less than that of the lands given in Franck-Almoigne by King Edgar in the last cited Charter, which are there said to be Omni terrenae servitutis jugo liberae imperpetuum. Thanelands alienated. Fifthly, The Feodal lands might not be aliened without Licence: But the Thane by the very words of his original Charter, might grant them cuicunque voluerit. Thanelands devised by Will. Sixthly, A Feodal tenant or tenant by Knights-service (as we call him) could not devise his land by Will before the statute of 32. Hen. VIII. tho' it were with Licence of the Lord and of the King himself, (which law the Germans themselves do hold even unto this day. And the Danes can yet devise no land by Will (as I am informed) but the Thane might devise his Thaneland to whom he would, as appeareth b● the words of King Edward the Confessor in a Charter to Thola, where he saith, Possideat hanc meam regiam dona●●onem quamdiu vivat, & post obitum suum cuicunque voluerit haeredi relinquat; excluding hereby all title of Wardship and Feodal duties. To the same effect are the rest of the Charters, and therewith agreeth the privilege of a Thane before mentioned, Thani lex est ut sit dignus rectitudine testamenti sui. As for that passage in the Will of Brictrick the Saxon, where he seeketh his Lord s consent that his Will may stand, I conceive it to be in respect of some ●o●●land or custumary land, which according to the use of that time he held at the will of his Lord, and not in respect of any Thaneland. For tho' this Brictrick were a man of great possessions, yet was he none of the chiefest sort of Than●s called the King's Thanes, but as appear by his Will, an under-Thane belonging to Aelfric, who was Earl of Mercia. And how far the privilege of these under or lesser-Thanes extended, I cannot yet determine. 〈…〉 g●●nted to Women. Seventhly, If Thaneland were of the nature of lands holden by Knight-service, then by the Feodal law of that time it could not transire a lancea ad fusum, that is, it might not be granted to Women; for Women were not then, nor long after capable of Feodal land. But the land here granted to Thola was Thaneland, as appeareth by the very words of her Charter; for that it is granted in aeternam haereditatem perpetualiter possidendam, which words (making an estate of inheritance) were only proper to Thaneland otherwise called Bocland; not to Folcland or Popular land, which was but at Will of the Lord for years or for life. 〈…〉 upon Thanelands but what was expressed. Eighthly, There could no tenure nor service lie upon the Thanelands, other than what was expressed in the Charters. For in the end of every of them there was an horrible curse (which in those days was fearfully respected) laid by the King himself upon all those that should violate the Charter, (either by adding other encumbrances, or by diminishing the granted immunities.) So that it is not to be supposed that there was any lurking Tenure, or matter of plus ultra to impeach them. The curse beginneth in every of the Charters with these words, Si quis autem, etc. Expedition, repairing of 〈…〉 Ninthly and lastly, Touching Expedition, and repairing of Castles and Bridges, which the Saxons called Burghbote and Brugbote, tho' the two first of them be wholly military, and the last serving as well for the passage of the King's Army as for the trade and commerce of his people; yet were none of them either marks of Tenure or of Feodal service, as appear by that we have formerly showed, and by the testimony of these Charters, where (to use the words of Edw▪ the Confessor in that to Thola) it is said that they are, Omnibus hominibus communia, a common burden to all men, as belonging to the safety and sacred anchor both of the Kingdom and Commonwealth. The Saxons therefore did not call them services or Feodal duties, as things that lay upon the person of the owner; but landirecta, rights that charged the very land whosoever did possess it Church or Lay man. And these duties were ordinarily excepted in every Charter, not for that they should otherwise be extinguished, but per superabundantem cautelam, lest the general words precedent should be mistaken to involve them and to release that which the King could not release. For tho' Ethelbald by his Charter to the Monks of Croyland 1 Ingul●. p. 851, 852. did give the site of that Monastery, with the appendancies, etc. libera & soluta ab omni onere seculari in perpetuam el●emosynam, yet in his Charter of privileges granted to all Churches and Monasteries of his Kingdom, speaking of the repairing of Castles and Bridges, he confesseth and saith, that Nulli unquam relaxari possunt. And I suppose that the word Expedition was here omitted by the negligence of the Scribe; for I never find it severed from repairing of Castles and Bridges in any other Charter. And also tho' King Ethelwulf by his memorable Charter of privileges (ratified by the great Council of Winchester in the year 855.) did by express words free Sanctam Ecclesiam, that is all the Churches and Monasteries of his Kingdom, ab Expeditione & pontis extructione & arcis munitione 1 Conc. Brit. in An. 855. ex Ingulf. Malmesb. & al. , yet the whole Clergy about the year 868. did notwithstanding voluntarily assist his son Beorredus against the Danes with all the power they could, as appeareth by the Charter of the same Beorredus. CHAP. XI. More touching the freedom of Thaneland out of Doomsday. Thanelands disposed of at the pleasure of the owner. THo' that which is delivered in these Charters be authentical and need no farther proof, yet to convince broad spreading errors the more manifestly, it will not be unnecessary to show what Doomsday itself relateth to confirm it. For whereas lands holden in Capite and by Knights-service, could not otherwise be disposed than by licence of the King or Superior Lord, Doomsday showeth that the Thanelands might be used and disposed at the pleasure of the owner, without impeachment of any other. For at Ebsa in Suthry under the title of Ric. fill. Comitis Gisleberti, it saith, Hanc terram tenuerunt novem Teigni & cum ea poterant utere quo volebant. Plain Latin, but the sense is, That nine Thanes held this land of Ebsam (in the time of Edward the Confessor) and might do with it what they would. So at Est-Burnham in Buckinghamshire under the title of Milo Crispin, Duo Teigni homines Brictrici hanc terram tenuerunt, & vendere potuere: and here it seemeth that these Thanes were not the King's Thanes, but of the lesser sort; for that he calleth them homines Brictrici. So in the same Shire under the title of S. Petr. Westmon. it is said of the same Town of Est-Burnham: Hoc manerium tres Treigni Tempore Regis Edwardi tenuerunt, & vendere potuerunt. Thaneland charged with a rent. It there also appeareth that the Thaneland might be charged with a rent issuing out of it, for it immediately followeth, & tamen ipsi tres reddiderunt quinque oras de consuetudine. And it might be restrained from alienation, as where it is said in Doomsday, De ea (viz. Lega Pelton) sunt in dominio duae hidae; una ex hiis fuit Tainland, non tamen poterat ab Ecclesia separari. Where the word tamen implieth, that altho' Thanelands might otherwise be alienated, yet this particularly could not. So likewise might it be entailed upon a Family, as appeareth in the laws of Alured Cap. 37. But thus Doomsday after the Conquest affirmeth the same that the Charters did before the Conquest. And the words both in the one and the other, which show that the Thane might sell or use this land as he would, do imply an estate of inheritance independent of any Lord either feodal or superior, and was as even the Alodium mentioned in the Chapter of Thanes; but whether it were descendable only upon the eldest son, or dividable between all the sons as in Gavelkind, I cannot say, but the formula of Alodium joined with Marculfus doth divide it between them all. CHAP. XII. The fruits of Feodal Tenors, and that they were not sound among the Saxons, or not after our manner. HItherto we have sought our Tenors among the Saxons, and have not found them, tho' the Report 1 Pag. 35. telleth us, It is most manifest that they were frequent and 2 Pag. 36. common in the times of the Saxons. We will now follow the direction of our Saviour 3 Ma●●●. 1●. 33. , and see if by the fruit we can find the tree. The Report saith 4 Pag. 33. , (by question and answer) The fruits of the Tenure viz. in Capite and Knights-service) what are they? but the (1) Profits of the lands. (2) Wardship. (3) Livery. (4) Premier seisin. (5) Relief, mistaken to be an Heriot. (6) Fine for alienation and the rest: Which rest it 5 Pag. 36, 37. supplieth shortly after to be (7) Homage. (8) Fealty. (9) Escuage: Adding again Relief and Wardship, instead whereof I out of a third passage 6 Pag. 33. do place (10) Escheats. And it concludeth 7 Pag. 36, 37. that As all these tenors were common in those times, so were all the fruits of them, etc. Which if it be true the question is determined; nay, I yield it, if any one of them agreeing directly with our Tenors be found amongst them; some show of Fealty and Licence to alien lands granted for a certain time, only excepted, for avoiding captious disputation. Their very names pretend no Saxon antiquity, but as the Ephramites bewrayed their Tribe by their Language, so by their names these fruits discover themselves to be of Norman progeny. And the Report doth not give us one instance or example of any of them in all the Saxon times. If it did, the words before mentioned in the Charters to the Thanes, declaring that their land must be libera ab omni seculari gravedine, etc. sweep all away at once as the West-wind did the Grasshoppers in Egypt, and do make the Thanelands to have the privilege of Alodium (here before mentioned) to belong unto them, that is, to be free from all tenure and service. It is true notwithstanding that both the greater and lesser-Thanes might have, and had other lands (besides these that were hereditary) of feudal nature and holden by military service (as in the Charter of Oswald the Bishop shall after appear:) but they holding them like Folcland only at the will of the Lord (whether King or other) or for certain years, or at most for life or lives, their Tenure and Feuds determined with the will of the Lord, the term of years or estate for life. And then could not any of the fruits before spoken of, accrue unto the Lord that granted the land, for that it forthwith reverted entirely into his own hands, and was to be kept and disposed anew as pleased him. It is apparent therefore by this general demonstration, that the fruits we speak of, could not arise out of either of the Thanelands, (were they temporary or hereditary) if not haply fealty or some gratuity to the Lord for licence that the temporary Tenant might assign his interest or have it enlarged, (things proper as well to Socage and Folcland as to Feudal.) But let us examine all these fruits particularly, and see whether and how we find any of them among the Saxons; and give me leave herein to produce them in such order (tho' not logical) as the Report presenteth them to the Reader in their several places. CHAP. XIII. No profit of Land by Wardship in the Saxons time. Profits by Wardship. AS for the profits of the land which the King hath now during the minority of a Ward, it is manifest that the Kings than had no such of the Thanelands; for that the Thane had this particular privilege, that when he died he might make his Will of his own lands (as it formerly appeareth) and Chap. 8. give them unto whom he would, which was never lawful after the coming of the Normans, for any Baron or Tenant by Knight-service to do; till the statute 32. Hen. VIII. Cap. 1. gave free liberty to all men to devise all Socage-land by their last Will in writing, and no more than two parts only of land holden in Capite or by Knight-service, lest it should hinder the Lords too much of their Feodal profits. And Socage-lands were therefore long before devisable in many Burroughs, for that thereby the Lord sustained no such prejudice. But to conclude this point in one word, it shall (I hope) be made manifest in the next Chapter, that there were no Wardships amongst the Saxons, and thereupon it will follow invincibly there could be then no profits of lands arising to the King or Lords by title of Wardship. CHAP. XIV. No Wardship in England amongst the Saxons. Objections answered. IN following the Report I must now speak de causa post causatum; of Wardship after the Profits of land growing by it. This being the chiefest fruit of all feodal servitudes, and the root from whence many branches of like grievances take their original; the Report laboureth more to prove it to have been in use among our Saxons, than it doth in all the rest of them, and enforceth me thereby to the greater labour in examining it, and discovering the contrary. The name Wardship. Touching the name (Wardship) I confess it carrieth a Saxon sound, but from Norman Godfathers, with whom Gardiner signifying the same that Ward doth with us, and they bringing this custom into England, our English Ancestors (as in a multitude of other words) changed the Norman G. into a W. and so made Ward for Guard, and thereof Wardship for Gardship. Yet to this day we call him that hath the custody of the ward, after the Norman manner his Guardian not his Warden. But I find neither Ward, Wardship nor Warden, in this sense, in any Saxon Law, Charter, or Manuscript, or any thing conducing to such signification: The proof being in the affirmative lieth on the other side, yet doth not the Report produce one single Case, Text, or Precedent, to maintain their assertion; but like Pythagoras' Scholars, resteth wholly upon Ipse dixit, such and such have said it; and I am now turned over to those Authors. Mr. Selden's judgement. They have chosen a right good foreman (1 confess) Mr. Selden, of whom I say as she in Ovid, Nomine in Hectoreo pallida semper eram. But let us hear what he affirms, according as the Report conceiveth him, where the words be thus. 1 P. 37. Sect 160. That Wardships were then (viz. in the Saxon's time) in use, and not brought in by the Normans, as Mr. Cambden in his Britt. 179. nor by Henry III. as Randolph Hygden, etc. would persuade. Vid. Selden's notes to Fort●scue, 51.▪ The Report says Vide, and I say audi. Mr. Selden to confute this opinion attributed to Rand. Hygden useth these words. Neither is the custom of Wardship so new as R. Hygden in his Polycronicon, or rather some others not understanding him, ignorantly make it, by supposing the beginning of it here under Hen. III. clearly Wardships were before or from the Normans at least. Thus Mr. Selden. There may be some amphiboly in the word before, as doubtful whether it shall relate to the Normans or to Hen. III. but the occasion of his speech is to confute the opinion of them that did attribute the beginning of Wardships to Hen. III. saying, that clearly they were before, and tho' he determineth not how long before, yet he concludeth that from the Normans at least, citing Glanvill to show they were in use in Hen. II's time, and the Grand Custumer of Normandy to fetch them higher than so from the Normans, who (by the opinion of Berhault that writ the Commentary to that Custumary) did first bring them into England. Mr. Selden (God be thanked) is living to explain himself, and I find (by chance) where he hath done it fully. His words in the Titles of Honour be thus, 2 Par▪ 11. cap. 8. p. 301. These kind of Military Fiess or Fees as we now have, were not till the Normans, with whom the customs of Wardship in Chivalry (they began not under Hen. III. as most ignorantly R. Hygden the monk of Chester and Polydore tells you) came into England. And speaking by and by of Malcolm second King of Scotland, who died about twenty two years before the Conquest, he saith: But in this Malcolme's time, Wardships were not at all in England. Thus, Mr. Selden, whom they so often press against me out of ambiguous places, is clearly with me. Lambards' opinion. Their next Authority to prove Wardships to have been in use amongst the Saxons, is (saith the Report) that amongst the privileges granted by Edw. the Confessor to the Cinque Ports we meet with this, That their heirs shall not be in Ward. For this they cite Lambard's Perambulation of Kent, p. 101. but I demand Oyer of the Record, and I verily persuade myself Nul tiel Record, nor in truth hath Lambard averred that there is. Lambard's 3 P. 123, & 124. words be these, The privileges of these Ports being first granted by Edw. the Confessor and William the Conqueror, and then confirmed and increased by William Rufus, Hen. II. Rich. I. Hen. III. and King Edw. the first, be great, etc. And in reciting some of these privileges, he tells us amongst the rest, That they themselves (the Inhabitants of the Cinque Ports) be exempted from all payments of Subsidies, and their Heirs freed from Wardship of body notwithstanding any Tenure. He doth not say that this is in the Charter of Edward the Confessor, but that it is among the privileges granted by him and William the Conqueror, and then confirmed and increased by the succeeding Kings. Doubtless the word Subsidies here mentioned in this sense, was not in use either in the Confessor or Conqueror's time, nor in many years after till Taxes, Aids, and Tallages were grudged at and restrained. I am therefore confident that this came in among the increased privileges afterward, and it appeareth that Mr. Lambard was not persuaded that there was such a Charter of the Confessor's time, and therefore waving it seeketh the original of the privileges of the Cinque Ports, no further than the Conqueror. Why then do we father this upon the Confessor, especially seeing the Charter of 4 Lib. intrat. Tit. Challenge. fol. 1156. Anno 6. Edw. I. wherein all the Charters of the precedent Kings seem to be mentioned, that of Edw. the Confessor is not spoken of. Magna Charta. The third assertion is, that in the customs of Kent, ( 5 p. 37▪ which are in Magna Charta of Tottil's Edition, and in Lambard's Perambulation) there is a rule for the Wardship of the heir in Gavelkind, and that he shall not be married by the Lord. And those customs say of themselves, that they were devant le Conquest, e en le Conquest. The words in Lambard be devant le Conquest, e en le Conquest, e toutes hour's ieskes en ca That is, before the Conquest and at the Conquest, and ever since till now: which word (now) relateth to the 2●. of Edw. I. there immediately before mentioned. And to save the credit of the Author, must be favourably understood to be meant of such customs, as were in use either before the Conquest, or at the Conquest, or at any time since, in the disjunctive not in the aggregative. For if it be taken conjunctively, then is it notoriously false, for some things mentioned in it had their original under Hen. II. as the Grand Assize, and Justices of Eyer 1 Pag. 571. , whereof that of Eyer was not instituted, till the Council (or Parliament as we now call it) of Nottingham, An. Dom. 1176. viz. in the 22. or 23. of Hen. II. And for that of the Grand Assize, it is expressly said in the customs, that it was granted them by Hen. III 2 P. 584. . Many other things there be, as the Office of the Crowner, the manner of Essoyning, Writ of Cessavit, etc. which I suppose was never heard of before the Conquest. But if you mark it, the words in question, viz. devant le Conquest, etc. stand in Lambard at a little more distance than the lines precedent, as if himself conceived them not to belong unto the text of customs. And to clear the doubt in the elder Edition 3 Fol. 148. published by Tottill 12. June 1556. no such thing is mentioned; but if it were, there are such other differences in their copies as both their authorities may be questioned, and I in the mean time well delivered from this objection. Let us see what followeth. Wardship in Scotland. Fourthly, For the antiquity of Wardships in England and Scotland." See also (says the Report 4 Pag. 38. ) Hector Boet. lib. 2. Buchanan rerum Scot lib. 6. and the laws of Malcome II. which prove the antiquity of Wardships in Scotland and in England before the Conquest 5 P. 38. . For in those times it is probable the laws of both Nations did not much differ; as for the times after, it appears they did not, by comparing their Regiam Majestatem with our Glanvil. Neither is the bare conjecture of Sir Henry Spelman sufficient to take away the force of those laws, Vid. Spelman's Glossary verbo Feudum. Upon all this (saith the Report) they (the Justices of Ireland) did conclude and proceed to sentence." With the sentence (as a sacred thing) I will not meddle. But as touching that part of this argument which— In nostros fabricata est machina muros— I'm tied either to answer or to submit. For Hector Boethius therefore, I confess Hector Boethius. the place to be truly alleged, (and that hitherto hath seldom happened) but for the credit of that Author I wish Leland were alive to deliver the censure he hath left upon him with his own mouth: I forbear it. True it is, he relateth that Malcolm II. gave all his lands well nigh unto his Nobility in reward of their service, and that they in thankfulness to support his dignity, regranted unto him, Vardam, Desponsationem, & releviam al. relevatam, Wardship, and Marriage of their Heirs within age, and Relief of those of full age. The Paragraph there is long, but to the effect we spoke of. It is also true that Buchanan doth report the like, and since him Cameraris, and a little before them all Johannes Major; but all their harping is from the sound of one string, which in the Report is not left unstrained, i. e. the laws of Malcolm before mentioned, where it is said, that ad montem placiti in Villa de Scona omnes Barones concesserunt sibi Wardam, & Releviam de Haerede cujuscunque Baronis defuncti ad sustentationem Domini Regis. Which, because they concern a noble Kingdom, and have been received as authentical by an ancient Parliament, I will not presume to contradict it. But I humbly offer to the consideration of the Learned of that Kingdom, and to those of ours and theirs that are conversant in Antiquities, these particulars following. Th● authority of 〈…〉. First, It being agreed (which the Scots affirm) that Malcolm II. begins his reign in the year 1004. (i. e. above 60. years before the Normans Conquered England) how it cometh to pass that Malcolm useth so many Norman words in his Scottish Laws, and whether those words be found in any other monument there before: for in England it was not so. Secondly, Whether their Kings then had not only a Seal but magnum sigillum in the custody of the Chancellor, and set-fees appointed for the use of it; for in England it was not so, though▪ Edward the Confessor had a Seal after Malcolm's time. Thirdly, Whether they had brevia clausa in cera, and other ordinary instruments sealed cum magno sigillo, and fees appointed for it; for in England it was not so. Fourthly, Whether they had solemn presentations to Churches and Hospitals under Seals in that manner; for this was long before the Council of Lateran. Fifthly, Whether they had then the names of Barons, Seneschallus, Constabularius, Mareschallus, (not in use in England in the time of the Confessor) as appeareth, for the two latter, by the Appendix to the Confessors laws 1 Fol. 112. a. ; and for their Seneschallus called their Steward, Buchanan 2 Lib. 7. f. 75. b. says he was brought in by Malcolm III. into Scotland. Sixthly, Whether the Norman Officers of Justiciarius, Vicecomes, Coronator, Ballivus, etc. were then in use by any other proof than by or from these laws; & sic de caeteris. Many other things I pretermit, and take no exception to the frequent mention of Pounds and Shillings, tho' I know they were scarce with them in Scotland; as not abundant then in England, but paid in Truck and cattle. The agreement of the English and Scotch Laws. But I admit that which the Report saith, that in those times it is probable the laws of both Nations did not much differ. As for the times after, it appeareth they did not, by comparing their Regiam Majestatem with our Glanvil. They run much (I confess) paribus vestigiis, and oftentimes totidem verbis, iisdem paragraphis. Whether of them leads or follows the other, I dare not define, and am loath to dispute. The Preface to the Regia Majestas showeth it to be written at the command of King David; whom Skeneus in his Annotations calleth the first, and saith, he began to reign Anno 1124. i. e. 24. or 25. of Hen. I. And 'tis certain that our Glanvil was not written till the time of Hen. II. who began not to reign till 1154. so that if this be true, it must needs follow that we took a great part of the model of our laws, or at least the expression of them, from the Scots, (which our Ancestors never yet acknowledged). It may perhaps fall out (upon better examination) that David I. may be mistaken for David II. But for the part of Malcolm II's laws, which speak of Wardship, Marriage and Relief in Scotland at that time, to have risen from their own Nobility; Buchanan himself recedeth from that opinion, and concludes, Hun● morem ab Anglis & Danis potius acceptum credo: quod in tota Anglia & parte Normanniae adhuc perseveret. And Demster himself, their greatest Antiquary, ingeniously confesseth, that there were no Barons in Scotland till Malcolm III created them. And he might well take his precedent from the Conqueror, for he lived all the time of the Conqueror, and about seven years after: so that if there were no Barons in Scotland in the time of Malcolm II. as Demster affirmeth, or the precedent taken out of England for Wardship, as Buchanan believeth: then could not this law be made in Malcolm II's. time, but seemeth rather (by both their opinions) to be ascribed to Malcolm III. and that the error hath risen (as easily it may) in writing II. for III. But in the mean time all this makes no proof against me. CHAP. XV. No Marriage of Wards. Marriage of Wards. AS for Marriage, it is here and in some other places mentioned by the Report, but not a word any where to prove that it belonged to the Lord in the Saxon time. I will help them with what I meet in the old MS. Book of Ramsey, Sect. 120. where it is said, that one Edwine son of Othulf gave five hides of land to Archbishop Odo, Pro eo quod Regem Edredum inflexerat, ut ei liceret filiam cujusdam viri Vlfi quem concupiverat, maritali sibi foedere copulare. Here it appeareth that the King's Licence or good will was sought, but the reason appeareth not. The good will of King Solomon was 2 Kings 2. 21. sought that Abishag might be given to Adoniah for his wife, but not in respect of Tenure in either case. It is an express law of King Canutus (Ll. 72.) ne nyde man naðer ƿif ne maeden, etc. That no man should constrain either woman or maid to marry otherwise than where they will, nor shall take any money for them, unless by way of thankfulness some do give somewhat. If these passages carry any show of Wardship, I must still let you know that Knight's Fees were not at this time descendable unto Women by the Feudal law, no nor long after, when they were become hereditary in the masculine line, Ne à Lancea ad fusum haereditas pertransiret, as you may see by Cujacius in feud. Lib. 1. Tit. 1. When marriages came in. The first law that I meet with touching Feudal marriages is in Magna Charta Libertatum Hen. I. yet is there nothing spoken of marrying the heir male of the King's Tenant within age. And touching the female issue it is only provided, that the King should be so far acquainted with their marriage, as that he might be assured they should not marry with his enemies, lest the feuds or feifs which were given for service against them, should by this occasion be transferred to them. Hear the words of the Charter. Et si quis Baronum meorum, vel aliorum hominum meorum siliam suam nuptui tradere voluerit, sive sororem suam, sive neptem, sive cognatam, mecum inde loquatur; sed nec ego aliquid de suo pro hac licentia accipiam, nec defendam ei quin eam det, excepto si eam velit jungere meo inimico. Et si mortuo Barone vel alio homine meo, filia haeres remanserit, & sine liberis fuerit, dotem suam & maritationem habebit, & eam non dabo marito, nisi secundum velle suum, etc. Ordaining, that the Wife shall be Guardian of the children's lands, or some near kinsman, qui justus esse debet; and that other Lords observe the like courses touching their Wards. Thus among the Normans: but I don't find in all the Feodal law of these times, any thing sounding to this purpose, nor any mention of Marriage or Wardship of the body or lands. I take them therefore to have risen from the Normans a little before their coming into England, but in a divers manner, according to the diversity of the places, and the moderate or covetous disposition of the Lords. For it seemeth that tho' the profits of the land belonged wholly to the Lord, and were therefore ordinarily so taken by him: yet some of the Lords deducting only the charge of Education of the Ward, and just allowances, restored him his lands at full age, with the surplusage upon account. And the Grantee of a Wardship from the King, was in Normandy tied to do it, as appear by the 215. Artic. of the reformed Customs; for otherwise they were not Guardians properly and Tutores rei pupillaris, but fructuarii rather, and suum promoventes commodum. See the Comment to that Article. 〈◊〉 marriage. So in point of Feodal marriage, it seemeth that the Charter of Henry I. was grounded upon the Norman Custom, which, though it required the consent of the Lord in tendering of Marriage to Women (for the reason aforesaid) yet did it not permit either him or the kindred or friends (whom they called the parents) to make it venal, or to take any thing for the same, as you may see by divers passages there, and by a case adjudged in the Comment to the 228. Article, where the Tutor or Guardian and the Parents and Friends thus offending, are all condemned to pay costs and damages. And note, that according to the Norman custom 1 Art. 228. ) the consent of the Parents, (viz. the next kindred and friends) was as requisite as the consent of the Lord or Tutor, which, as I conceive, gave the occasion of the words Si parents conquerantur, in the Statute of Merton 2 Cap. 6. , as in respect of the ancient right they had in consenting to the Marriage. And insomuch as we don't find that the various usages touching Wardship and Marriage, were composed into an uniform law till Magna Charta Henr. III. did determine it, it may be conceived to have been the reason that Rand. Higden before mentioned and our other Authors, did ascribe this part of our Feodal Law to be introduced by Henry III. But it is manifest by Glanvil that it was in use in Henry II's time: and by the Charter of Henry I. to have been so likewise under William Rufus; yet is there nothing hitherto any way produced to bring it from the Saxons, or to show it to have been in use amongst them. CHAP. XVI. No Livery, no Primer Seisin. Praerog. Reg. cap. 3 IF the King's Tenant in capite or by Knight-service dieth, the King shall have his lands till the heir hath done homage; which if he be of full age, he may do presently: but if he be under age the land must continue in the King's hands till his full age. And when either the one or the other sueth to have it out of the King's hands, his obtaining it is called Livery, and the profits received in the mean time by the King, are called his Primer Seisin. But neither of these could be among the Saxons, for that their hereditary lands were not Feodal, but libera ab omni gravedine, (as before we have showed.) And their temporary lands could not be subject to it, for that their Estate extended no farther than to a Frank Tenement. And neither the one or the other was then tied to do Homage, as shall appear when we speak of Homage. After the coming of the Normans they were presently afoot amongst us, even in William Rufus' days, but uncertain and irregular; which was a certain note of their novelty, and that Feuds hereditary were new begun. The great Charter of Liberties granted by Henry I. implieth as much: where to moderate them, the King saith thus, Si quis Baronum meorum seu Comitum sive aliorum qui de me tenent, mortuus fuerit, haeres suus non redimet terram suam sicut faciebat tempore fratris mei, sed legitima & justa relevatione relevabit eam. Similiter & homines Baronum meorum justa & legitima relevatione relevabunt terras suas de Dominis suis. I take this redeeming of the land out of the King's hands, to be a Composition for his Primer Seisin, and for the Livery and Relief, things uncertain at this time even in their Norman appellations, and not likely therefore to be known unto the Saxons. CHAP. XVII. That Reliefs (whereon the Report most relieth) were not in use among the Saxons; nor like their Heriots. No Reliefs among the Saxons. OF all the Feodal profits alleged in the Report to be received by the Saxons, it casteth anchor chiefly on Reliefs, as a thing most evident and unanswerable: the rest (save Wardship) it scarcely fortifieth with a breath besides the bare assertion. This it saith was common; and in pursuit thereof 1 Pag. 36. & 37. addeth these words. For Reliefs, we have full testimony in the Reliefs of their Earls and Thanes, for which see the laws of King Canutus, Cap. 68, and 69. the laws of Edw. the Confessor, cap. de Heretochiis, and what out of the book of Doomsday Coke hath in his Instit. Sect. 103. Camden in Berkshire, Selden in Eadmer. 154. Great authorities; secumque Deos in praelia ducunt. We must not meddle with them all at once, let us try them singly. The law cited out of Canutus is in these words: And beon ða heregeata, Let the heriot (which was to be paid after the death of great men) be according to their dignities. An Earl's, eight Horses, (four saddled and four unsaddled) four Helmets, four Corslets, eight Spears and as many Shields, four Swords and two hundred marks of Gold. The heriot of a Thane next to the King, four Horses (two saddled and two unsaddled) two Swords, four Spears, four Shields, one Helmet, one Corslet, and fifty marks. Of the inferior or middling Thane, an Horse furnished and his weapon, etc. Medmena mediocris. And he that less hath and less may, let his heriot be two pound. Here is speech indeed of an heriot but none of Relief: I shall anon show the difference between them, and then hath this law nothing against me. Touching the law alleged to be Edward the Confessor's, the words be these, Qui in bello ante Dominum suum ceciderit (sit hoc in terra sit alibi) sint ei relevationes condonatae, etc. Here I confess is mention of Reliefs, but I deny this to be the law of Edward the Confessor: 'tis true that it is published by Lambard among his received laws, but (if you mark it) in a differing letter as noting it to be an addition. In an ancient MS. therefore (which I have) of those laws, it is not sound, nor in the printed copy of Roger Hoveden, who wrote till the third year of King John, that is 134. years after the Confessor's time: with reverence therefore be it spoken, it is mistaken both in the Report and by my Ld. Coke himself, whom it followeth, if they say that these words were part of the law of Edw. the Confessor, yea, the text itself maketh maketh of William the younger called Rufus. But to conceal no truth, it is delivered by Jornalensis Monachus in the very same words, as a law of an elder King amongst us, than the Confessor; namely of Canutus our Danish King, who in the 157. Chap. of his laws (speaking of one slain in battle in the presence of his Lord) saith expressly, Sint ei relevationes condonatae. Now the game seemeth to be won; but stay a while, and remember what I said before of the translations of our Saxon Laws and Charters into Latin. The Saxons and the Danes (whose Language and Laws differed little in those days) wrote their Laws only in their own tongue, and the translating of them hath begotten much variety and many controversies; we must therefore resort to the original Saxon, where this passage is in the 75 th'. Chap. of the second part of his Laws in these words, & see man ðe aet ðam sy●dung toforan his hla●ord bealle, sy hit innan land, sy hit of land. beon herogeata forgyfene: which is thus verbatim, The man that in a military Voyage is slain before or in the presence of his Lord, be it upon land or off of land, let the Heriots be forgiven him. He saith not, let the Releifs, but let the Heriots be forgiven him, and I deny not but this might be one of the Danish Laws which Edward the Confessor took out of Canutus' Laws when he composed the Common Law out of the West Saxon Law, Mercian Law, and Dane Law, if the copies of them were extant; and it is very probable that William the Conqueror (or one of his sons) did turn that Law of Heriots into this of Reliefs. For that which my Lord Coke hath out of Doomsday, is the same which Mr. Cambden hath in Berkshire touching all that County. Vt Tainus vel Miles Regis Dominicus moriens, pro releviamento dimittebat Regi omnia arma sua, & Equum unum cum sella, & alium sine sella; quod si essent canes vel accipitres, praestabantur Releviamentum. Regi, ut sivellet, acciperet. Here is releviamentum used in the Conquerour's time, (which I doubt not,) but our Question is of it in the time of the Saxons. That also cited by and out of Mr. Selden is of the same nature, and one answer therefore serveth to all the three. Yet by way of corollary, I shall anon discover another error of this sort, rising even from Doomsday itself and the Normans possessing this Kingdom of the Saxons, but not well instructed in their Laws and Customs: which is as followeth. CHAP. XVIII. Difference between Heriots and Reliefs. Heriots and Reliefs. HEriots were usual among the latter Saxons: Reliefs among the elder Normans before their coming into England. This according to the custom of the Feudal Law, and other Nations: that ordained by Ludovicus al. Clodoveus King of France about the year 511. to tame the Almans whom he then had brought to servitude. I find it not in England till the Sovereignty of the Danes. The first Laws (which I find) that mention it, are those of Canutus before mentioned, who perhaps for the assurance of his throne used this politic device to have all the Armour of the Kingdom at his disposition in this manner, when he had dismissed his Danish Army. But it falling so out as the Heriot being to be paid at or after the death of the Old Tenant, and the Relief at or before the entry of the new; the Normans in this did like our Ancestors the Saxons, who, because our Christian Pascha or Passover fell out yearly to be celebrated about the time of the Feast of their Idol. Easter, called our Passover by the name of their Easter; so they seem to have conceived the Saxon heriot to be the same that their Norman Relief was, and therefore translated the word heriot by Releviamentum or Relevium, and raising the form of their Feudal Law in England, drew the Saxon customs to cohere therewith as much as might be. But there is great difference between Heriots and Reliefs; for Heriots were Militiae apparatus, which the word signifieth, and devised (as I said before) to keep the conquered Nation in subjection, and to support the public strength and military furniture of the Kingdom: the Reliefs for the private commodity of the Lord, that he might not have inutilem proprietatem in the signory. The Heriots were therefore properly paid in habiliments of war, the Reliefs usually in money: The Heriot for the Tenant that died, and out of his goods 1 Bracton fol 84. ● ; the Relief for the Tenant that succeeded and out of his purse. The Heriot whether the son or heir enjoyed the land or not: the Relief by none but him only that obtained the land in succession. The Heriot whether the land were fallen into the Lord's hands or not: the Relief in old time not unless it were fallen and lay destitute of a Tenant, whose taking of it up out of the Lord's hands was in that sense called Relevium or Relevatio, a taking up of that was fallen, according to the French word Relief. 1 Bracton fol. 84. a. num. 1. Bracton well observed the difference, saying, Fit quaedam praestatio quae non dicitur Relevium sed quasi, sicut Heriotum quasi loco Relevii, & quod dari debet aliquando ante sacramentum fidelitatis, aliquando post. Hotoman 2 Verb. Feudal. saith, Relevium dicitur honorarium (munus) quod novus Vassallus Patrono introitus causa largitur; quasi morte alterius Vassalli vel alio quo casu feudum ceciderit, quod jam à novo sublevetur. (Nou. Leo. 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nominat.) I stand the longer herein, for that not only the Report but even Doomsday itself and generally all the ancient Monkish writers, have confounded Heriots and Releifs. Yet might I have saved all this labour, for nothing can make the difference more manifest than that we often see both of them are together issuing out of the same land. But when all is done, neither is Heriot nor Releif any badge of land holden by Knight's-service or in Capite, for both of them are found in lands of ordinary Socage. Yet I confess that Bracton saith 3 Fol. 85. n. 8. , de soccagio non datur Relevium, and a little before, de soccagio non competit domino Capitali Custodia nec homagium: & ubi nulla Custodia, nullum Relevium, sed è contra. But this serveth my turn very well; for that they in the Report having failed to prove that Releifs were in use in the Saxons time, (whereof they affirmed they had full testimony) it now inferreth on my behalf that if Releifs and Wardships were not in use among the Saxons, that then also Tenure by Knight-service was not with them. Besides all this, the Heriot was a certain duty, and settled by Law, the Relief so various and uncertain, as the Lords exacted what they listed for it when it fell into their hands; constraining the heir of the Tenant, as it were to make a new purchase of their Feud; whereupon the Feudists called this Relief not only Renovatio and Restauratio feudi, in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, turning or bringing back of the Feud to the former condition or proper nature of it; but also Redemptio a ransoming of it out of the Lord's hands. That it thus stood with us in England by and by after the Conquest, appears by that we have showed before out of the Magna Charta of Henry I. CHAP. XIX. No Fines for Licence of Alienation. Fines for licence of alienation. TOuching Fines for Licence of Alienation, it is not said what kind of Tenants among the Saxons did pay them, nor for what kind of land they were paid. The Thaneland hereditary is apparently discharged thereof by the ordinary words of their Charters before mentioned, where 'tis said, that the owners of lands may give and bequeath them cuicunque voluerint, and that freely, ab omni munduali obstaculo. Doomsday also (as we here showed) doth testify as much, and so doth the very word Alodium, which the ancient Author's attribute to these lands. So that the Thanelands doubtless were free both from the Fine and Licence. Folcland. But as touching Folcland and land holden at will of the Lord, tho' continued in ancient time to their children after the manner of Copy-holds; it is no question but that they might both have Licence for aliening such lands, and also pay consideration for it; as our Copy-holders' do at this day. I find 1 〈◊〉 Kent T●●. M●pham. that one Brictrick in the time of King Etheldred about the year 984. bequeathed legacies of good value unto his Lord's wife, to entreat her Husband that this Brictrick's Will (whereby he had devised many lands and goods to Monasteries and divers men) might stand. And that Thola the widow of Irk a Thane of Edward the Confessor, obtained licence from the same King Edward, that she might devise both her lands and goods to the Monastery of Abbotsbury. But of what nature these Licences were, whether to alienate the land, or to make a Will, or to give the land to Monasteries as in Mortmain, I cannot determine. If they only intended alienation, than I understand them only of Lands holden (according to the custom of the time) at will of the Lord, or Folcland. Yet in that Thola's Licence was as well to bequeath her goods expressly as her lands; the Licence seemeth to be given therefore to make a Will, which no man then could do if not a Thane. (Quaere.) But howsoever it be expounded, it must not be extended to the Thanelands or land hereditary, for the reasons before alleged. And as touching Fines for Licence of Alienation after our manner (which the Report suggesteth) they could not doubtless be in use among the Saxons; for there are not found (as I suppose) here among us before the time of Edward I. and not established afterwards till 1. Edw. III. where the King granteth that from thenceforth lands holden in Chief, should not be seized as forfeited (which formerly they were) for Alienation without Licence, but that a reasonable Fine should be taken for the same. See the Statute▪ CHAP. XX. No Feodal Homage among the Saxons. Feodal homage. OUr word Man and homo in Latin, have for many ages in old time been used by the Germane and Western Nations for a Servant or Vassal. And from thence hominium and vassaticum, afterwards homagium was likewise used for hominem agere, to do the office or duty of a servant; (not to signify Manhood as some 2 Coke Instit. par. 1. Sect. 85. fol. 64. ●. expound it,) and so also Vassalagium. But by little and little all these latter words have been restrained, to note no more than our ceremonial homage belonging properly unto Tenors; which I met not with among our Saxons, nor any show thereof in former ages, unless we shall fancy that the Devil had it in his eye when he offered to give unto our Saviour all the Kingdoms of the world, if he would fall down and worship him. For here he maketh himself as Capital Lord, our Saviour as the Feodal Tenant: the Kingdoms of the world to be the Feud: the falling (or kneeling) down to be the homage: and the worshipping of him (consisting as the Feodists expound it in six rules of service) to be the Fealty. Pardon me this idleness, but from such missemblances rise many errors. Homage twofold. Homage (as we understand it in our Law) is of two sorts: one more ancient than the other called homagium ligeum, as due unto the King in respect of Sovereignty, and so done (more Francico) to King Pipin by Tassilo Duke of Bavaria about the year 756. The other homagium feodale or praediale, belonging to every feodal Lord, and not begun in France till Feuds were there made hereditary by Hugh Capet, nor in England till William the Conqueror did the like, as before appears. The reason of it was to preserve the memory of the Tenure and of the duty of the Tenant, by making every new Tenant at his entry to recognize the interest of his Lord, lest that the Feud being now hereditary and new heirs continually succeeding into it, they might by little and little forget their duty, and substracting the services, deny at last the Tenure itself. We see at this day frequent examples of it; for by neglecting of doing homage and those services, Tenors usually are forgotten and so revolved to the King by Ignoramus, to the great evil of their posterity that neglect it. Neither Bocland nor Folcland subject to homage. But the Saxons having only two kind of lands, Bocland and Folcland, neither of them could be subject unto homage: for the Bocland (which belonged properly to their greater Thanes) tho' it were hereditary, yet was it alodium and libera ab omni seculari gravedine, as before is showed, and thereby free from homage. And the Folcland being not otherwise granted by the King or his Thanes than at will, or for years, or for life, the tenant of it was not to do any homage for it. For Justice Littleton 1 Tenors lib. 2. Cap. 1. §. 90. biddeth us note, that none shall do homage but such as have an estate in fee simple or fee tail, etc. For (saith he) 'tis a maxim in law, that he which hath an estate but for term of life, shall neither do homage nor take homage. But admit the Saxons had the ceremony of doing homage among them, yet was it not a certain mark of Knights-service: for it was usual also in Socage-Tenure. And in elder ages, as well a personal duty as a praedial, that is done to Princes and great Men, either by compulsion for subjection, or voluntary for their protection, without receiving any feud or other grant of land or benefit from them. And he or they which in this manner put themselves into the homage of another for protection sake, were then called homines sui, and said commendare se in manus ejus or commendare se illi, and were thereupon sometimes called homines ejus commendati, and sometimes commendati without homines, as in Doomsday often 2 Norf. Terra Will. Ep. & Terra Fid. fill. Spirawi●. . Tho' we have lost the meaning of the phrase, yet we use it even to this day. Commend me unto such a man, which importeth as much as (our new compliment taken up from beyond the Seas) let him know that I am his servant. See the quotations here annexed, and note, that tho' the Saxons did (as we at this day) call their servants and followers homines suos, their men; yet we no where find the word Tenure, or the ceremony of homage among them, nor any speech of doing or of respiting homage. CHAP. XXI. What manner of Fealty among the Saxons. All oaths not fealty. SO for Fealty: if we shall apply every oath sworn by Servants and Vassals (for fidelity to their Lord) to belong unto Fealty, we may bring it from that which Abraham imposed upon his servant, put thy hand under my thigh, and swear, etc. For the Saxons abounded with oaths in this kind, following therein their Ancestors the Germans, who, as Tacitus 3 Germ. §. 46. saith, took praecipuum Sacramentum, a principal oath to defend the Lord of the Territory under whom they lived, and to ascribe their own valour to his glory. So likewise the homines commendati before mentioned, yea, the famuli ministeriales and household servants of Noble persons, were in ancient times and within the memory of our fathers, sworn to be faithful to their Lords. No Fealty but for a Fee. These and such other were anciently the oaths of Fealty, but illud postremo observandum saith Bignonius (a learned Frenchman of the King's great Council) fidelitatem hodie quidem feudi causa tantum praestari; showing farther that Fealty was first made to Princes by the Commendati and Fideles, without any feud given unto them, and that the Princes afterwards did many times grant unto them feuda vacantia, as to their servants: but whether the oath of fealty were so brought in upon feodal tenants, or were in use before, he doth not determine. In the mean time it hereby appeareth, that fealty in those days was personal as well as feodal or praedial, which imposeth a necessity upon them of the contrary part in the Report, that if they meet with fealty among the Saxons, they must show it to be feodal and not personal; for otherwise it maintaineth not their assertion. I will help them with a pattern of fealty in those times, where Oswald Bishop of Worcester granting the lands of his Bishopric to many and sundry persons for three lives, reserved a multitude of services to be done by them, and bound them to swear, That as long as they held those lands, they should continue in the commandments of the Bishop with all subjection. I take this to be an oath of Fealty, but we must consider whether it be personal or praedial. If personal, it nothing then concerneth Tenors, and consequently not our question. If praedial, then must it be inherent to the land, which here it seemeth not to be, but to arise by way of contract. And being praedial must either be feodal, as for land holden by Knight-service; or Colonical as for lands in Socage. If we say it is feodal, then must there be homage also as well as fealty, for homage is inseparable from a feud by Knight-service: but the estates here granted by Oswald being no greater than for life, the Grantees must not (as we have showed) either make or take homage. And being lastly but Colonical or in Socage, it is no fruit of a Tenure in Capite by Knight-service, nor belonging therefore to our question. So that if fealty be found among the Saxons, yet can it not be found to be a fruit of Knight-service in Capite, as the Report pretendeth it, See Fidelitas in my Glossary. CHAP. XXII. No Escuage among the Saxons. What in the Empire. 〈…〉. THe word Scutagium and that of Escuage, is of such novelty beyond the Seas, as I find it not among the feudists, no not among the French or Normans themselves, much less among the Saxons. Yet I meet with an ancient law in the Novella of Constantine Porphyrogenita (Emperor of Greece in the year 780.) that gives a specimen of it, tho' not the name. 1 〈◊〉 in Lib. 1. pag. 7. Quaedam esse praedia militaria, quibus cohaereat onus Militiae, ita ut possessorem necesse sit se ad militiam comparare domino indicante delectum: vel si nolit aut non possit se ad delectum exhibere, certam eo nomine pecuniam fisco dependere, quae feudorum omnium lex est, etc. This tells us, that there were certain lands to which the burden of warfare was so adherent, that every owner of them was tied upon summons made by his Lord to make his appearance therein, or else to pay certain money by way of a Fine, as was common in all cases of Feodal Tenors. Summons in the Empire. This hath some show of our Escuage, and might well have taken that name from the manner of summons used in the Empire; which was by erecting a post or pillar, and hanging a Shield at the top thereof, an Herald proclaiming that all who held in this manner should at such a day attend the Emperor in his voyage to Rome, for taking the Crown of Italy or King of Romans; which the Ligurine Poet thus expresseth, 2 Gunter. de Gest. Freder▪ I. Lib. 2▪ p 301. — Ligno suspenditur alte Erecto Clypeus: tunc Praeco regius omnes Convocat a dominis feudalia jura tenentes, etc. as we have showed in our Glossary verbo Feudum. He useth Clypeus for a Shield, instead of Scutum; and from this shield I say it might well be called Scutagium, as also from the service performed in it cum hasta & scuto. Yet this summons was not called Schiltbannum but Heribannum, that is indictio exercitus, not indictio s●uti. But to keep nearer the matter. First, our Saxons neither used the name nor the rules of the Norman Escuage; for they called their going to war upon legal summons, firdfare and utfare, in Latin Expeditionem and Profectionem. Secondly, they were not tied to any definite time of abode, as for forty days or more or less, but as the law saith 1 Cannt. Ll. ca 10. , sƿa a ðon ðearf sy for gemene●●●re neode, so as need shall require for common necessity. Thirdly, the mulct or forfeiture that the Tenant in Escuage incurred for not going forth upon that summons, was uncertain among the Normans and us, till the Parliament assigned it; but among the Saxons he that offended in Ferdwite, that is, in not going forth in the Expedition, was certainly fined at 120 2 Cannt. Ll. ca 12. & 13. . Fourthly, whereas every Lord among us had the fine assessed by Parliament of his own Tenant for the Lands holden of himself; the King among the Saxons had the fine aforesaid of every delinquent, whose Tenant or follower soever he were, by all the Laws of the kingdom, that is to say, by the West-Saxon Law, by the Mercian, and by the Dane Law; tho' otherwise they differed 3 Ibid. ca 69. in their Heriots, and many particular customs. So that to talk of Escuage among the Saxons, is without all colour or probability as I take it. CHAP. XXIII. No Feodal Escheat of Hereditary Lands among the Saxons. Escheats. EScheats (of Eschoeir in French) signifieth things coming accidentally, as on the by or by chance. The F●odists therefore call them Caduca (a cadendo) and excadentias; the black book of the Exchequer Escaetas, excidentia and excadentia: but among our Saxons I find no word to express them either properly or paraphrastically. In our Law they be of two sorts, Regal Escheats and Feodal. Regal are those obventions and forfeitures which belong generally to Kings by the ancient right of their Crowns and supreme dignity. Thus King David gave the lands of Mephibosheth accused of Treason, unto Ziba (tho' too hastily.) Feodal are those which accrue to every Feodal Lord as well as to the King, by reason of his signory, and of all the fruits of Tenure none so great as this (if we may call it a fruit) where the feud or tree itself resulteth back unto the Lord. Let us see therefore if we find any of these Feodal Escheats among the Saxons. Canutus' Law examined. There is a shrewd text (I confess) in Canutus his Laws. Qui fugiet à domino suo vel socio pro timiditate in expeditione navali vel terrestri, perdat omne quod suum est, & suam ipsius vitam, & manus mittat dominus ad terram quam ei dederat, & si terram haereditariam habeat, ipsa in manum Regis transeat. Here is the appearance of a Tenure, of a Feud, of a Forfeiture, and of an Escheat. The Tenure lieth between the Lord and his fugitive Vassal, whom the Saxons and Germans called his Man, we his Tenant. The Feud in the Land, quam d●m●nus ●i dederat. The forfeiture, in fugiendo, in the Vassals running away. And the Escheat, in the Lord's seizing of the land: manus mittat dominus in terram quam ei dederat, Let the Lord take back the estate which he gave in the temporary feud: But for the hereditary land, he saith, transeat (non redeat) in manum Regis. All this is nothing in our case; for I declared in the beginning that our question was fixed upon such feuds as the Law of England taketh notice of at this day, that is, of feuds after they were become hereditary and perpetual, not of those mentioned by Gerardus Niger, which were temporary as at will of the Lord, or for years, or for life, like them here intended by Canutus. This very Law observeth the difference, and discovereth also that feuds were not hereditary in his time, and therefore giveth the feodal land, being but a temporary estate, back unto the Lord (in whom the Reversion was by inheritance) as a feodal right, but giveth the hereditary Lands unto the King as a Regal Escheat; for that there was no mean or intervenient Lord to claim them by any feodal tenure, for that the hereditary lands among the Saxons (otherwise called Bocland) were holden of no body, nor subject to any feodal service, (as we have often declared) and could not therefore Escheat unto any feodal Lord. The Kentish custom of the father to the Bough and the son to the Plough, suggesteth as much, and showeth also to have been the general use of England, till the Conqueror introducing hereditary feuds, put upon us therewith these greater feodal servitudes of Wardship, Marriage, Escheats, etc. So that the hereditary lands not being feodal in the Saxon's time, nor the feodal lands hereditary; there could then be no feodal Escheats among them. And I take it to be considerable whether the land resumed by the Lord upon his Vassal's running away, be properly an Escheat by the Law of Canutus, or rather a penalty only imposed in this particular case. CHAP. XXIV. Thaneland and Reveland what: no marks of Tenure but distinctions of Land-holders'. Thanelands. THere is yet another assertion, rather showed than proved, 1 〈…〉 p. 34. That the Thani majores or King's Thanes, held by personal service of the King's person by Grand Serjanty or Knights-service in Capite. And the reason following is, that the land so held was in those times called Thaneland, as land Reveland. holden in Socage was called Reveland: so frequently in Doomsday 2 〈…〉. , Haec terra fuit terra Regis Edwardi Thainland, sed postea conversa est in Reveland; Coke's Instit. §. 117. Thus the Report dischargeth itself upon my Lord Coke, whose words be these, It is to be observed that in the book of Doomsday, land holden by Knights-service was called Thainland, and land holden by Socage was called Reveland. I reverence the opinion of that famous Lawyer with admiration, but I suppose he speaketh not this ex tripode juridico. For it is impossible, that it and that which is before delivered out of the very Charters of the Saxon Kings themselves, should stand together, viz. That their Thanelands should be liberae ab omni seculari gravedine, and yet be subject to that which of all other was most grievous, viz. our Knights-service in Capite. It may be answered, (as the Report 3 Pag. 25. l. 2. in another place delivereth positively) That Tenure in Capite cannot be transferred or extinct by release or grant; for it is an incident inseparably annexed to the Crown. The answer were good if once they had made it appear that both this Tenure and this Law were in force in the Saxons time. There is nothing showed to prove that suggestion, and were it true I should desire no better argument on my behalf than what the place itself bringeth with it. For if Thaneland were converted into Reveland, and that Reveland signify Socage-land, than it is as manifest as the Sun, that Tainland did not signify land holden by Knights-service in Capite; for if it did, then could it not decline into Socage-Tenure, as their own Maxim doth demonstrate. Coke's citation false If there be a cloud before this Sun, I shall remove it also. My Lord Coke citing this place out of Doomsday, noteth in the margin Herefords●. but delivereth both the title and the text by halfs. The title is Hereford. Rex. the text thus: Haec terra fuit tempore Edwardi Regis Tainland, sed postea conversa est in Reveland. Et idem dicunt legati Regis quod ipsa terra & census qui inde exit, furtim aufertur Regi. The very title discovers the Tenure, for if it be Terra Regis, (as the word Rex declareth it) than it is plainly Ancient Demesne, and every Lawyer will tell us, that in ancient Demesne there was no Tenure by Knights-service, but wholly in Socage. So that this cloud now vanisheth into the air, and our Tainland is clearly discovered to be but Socage. I shall speak more of it afterwards. Sense of Doomsday. But what construction shall we now find for the words in Doomsday, Tainland conversa est in Reveland. (Hoc opus, hic labor est.) It is sufficient for me to have quit myself of the objection, they must seek some new interpretation. Yet will I help them what I can in that also: I suppose that the land which is here said to have been Thaneland, T. E. R. and after converted into Tempore Edwardi Regis. Reveland: was such land as being reverted to the King after the death of his Thane, who had it for life, was not since granted out to any by the King, but rested in charge upon the account of the Reve or Bailiff of the Manor, who (as it seemeth) being in this Lordship of Hereford, like the Reve in Chaucer, a false brother, concealed the land from the Auditor and kept the profit of it to himself; till the Surveiors, who are here called Legati Regis, discovered this falsehood and presented to the King, that furtim aufertur Regi, as by the words in the latter part of the paragraph (which my Lord Coke reciteth) appeareth. Besides all this, why should the coming of these lands into the Reve's account, alter the nature of the Tenure, seeing all men know that the Reves and Bailiffs of Manors govern and dispose the lands thereof, as well which are holden by Knights-service as those in Socage. The French Custumary As for the old French MS. Custumary (which they affirm doth mention Tenors by Knights-service, long before the Saxons even in the time of the Britain's;) I doubt not but there may be such a passage in it; for the Law which they ascribe to Edward the Confessor for proving Feuds to be in use in his time, affirmeth also that the Laws, Dignities, Liberties, etc. of the City of London were at that day the same which were in Old Great Troy. But as they in the Report wave the one, so I take them both for Romances, and pass them over as not worth an answer. Having thus particularly answered every argument, inference and objection, produced in the Report, to prove our Feuds and Form of Tenors to have been in use amongst our Saxons; I shall now conclude that it neither was nor could be so, unless we shall assume that our poor illiterate Saxons (in a corner of the World) were the Authors of the Feodal Law, and gave the precedent thereof to the Germans, Longobards, French, Italians, and the Empire. For in none of these was it otherwise extant (till about the end of our Saxon Monarchy;) then by such buds and branches as we formerly have expressed out of Caesar, Tacitus, and some other. CHAP. XXV. How the Saxons held their Lands, and what obliged them to so many kinds of Services. IT cometh now in question, how the Saxons held their lands, and what obliged them to that multitude of services which lay upon them both in war and peace. 〈…〉. As for Tenors, I still say that they had not the name in use among them, yet (like the Jews, the Greeks, the Romans, and other ancient Nations) a multitude of services, whereof some were personal, and some praedial. Personal 〈◊〉. Personal services were those which a man did for his person or personal Estate, either generally to the King and Commonwealth in public occasions, as in the Trinodi necessitate, etc. or particularly to his own Lord upon particular agreement between them, like the Commendati before mentioned, and some ministerial Officers and domestic servants. Praedial 〈◊〉. Praedial service was that which was done after the same manner (to the King or his Lord) for land only; and this was of three sorts, Alodial, Beneficiary, and Colonical. Alodial ●●●●ice. Alodial service was that which the Greater Thanes and other who had Alodial land (otherwise called Bocland, and as I take it Gavelkind and Hereditary land) were tied to do pro bono publico to the King and Commonwealth, in respect of those Lands; tho' by the Feudal law that kind of land was free from all Tenure and Feodal service. I should not therefore use this solecism to call them services, if the Dialect of our Law afforded me some other fit expression; but the Saxons themselves termed them Land-rights not services, of which sort were the Trinodis necessitas of Expedition, Burghbote and Brigbote, the guarding of the sea and of the peace, attendance upon the King's summons for his Park or Palace before expressed, and besides them all the Tribute of Danegelt, etc. Beneficiary services. Beneficiary services were those, which were done by the middling or lesser Thanes to the King, and the greater Thanes either militarily in war, or ministerially in peace, for those portions of Out-land, which being granted to them temporarily (as at will of the Lord or for life or lives) were then called Beneficia, but being extended after to perpetuity, they were named by the Normans Feoda. The Creation, manner, variety, and multitude of them, you shall see in the Charter of Bishop Oswald, by and by ensuing. Colonical 〈◊〉. Colonical services were those which were done by the Ceorls and Socmen, (that is, Husbandmen) to their Lords (the King and Thanes) of all sorts, for some portions also of their Out-lands. These were after called feoda rustica beyond the Seas, with us Socage-lands, and were holden at pleasure of their Lords either by rendering part of the profits thereupon growing or reared, as victuals especially, in Saxon called Feorms, etc. (whereof see the rates in the Laws of King Ina, Chap. 70.) or by doing some works of Husbandry upon the Lord's Inlands now called his Demeans, as Tillage, Carriage, Harvest-works, etc. Among all these diversities of services, none cometh so near to the nature of Feuds and Tenors, as the Beneficiary do. Let us therefore consider them the more seriously by that notable pattern of them left unto us from Bishop Oswald, who dividing much of the land of his Church of Worcester into those kind of portions, which after the Feodal word then in use he called Beneficia, granted the same unto his Thanes and followers, not by the name of his milites or tenentes, but of his fidos subditos, for the term of three lives (according to the manner which they retain in those parts even to this day) and reserving to his Church and successors not homagium & s●rvitium, the material words in Tenure to create Knights-service in the Feodal Law, but the services mentioned in his Charter secundum Conventionem cum eis factam & sponsionem suam, as the very words are there expressly. But hear the Charter or rather Epistle as he himself calleth it, which the King confirmed and a Council. The Aranga or preamble of it is a thankful acknowledgement of King Edgar's bounty and goodness to him (the Bishop) and his Church; the conclusion (after the manner of those times) a curse and heavy imprecation against all such as shall spoil or violate the same. Both which being long and nothing to our purpose, I think convenient here to pretermit. The rest is as followeth under the title given it in the Manuscript. CHAP. XXVI. The Charter whereby Oswald Bishop of Worcester disposed divers lands of his Church after the Feodal manner of that time, entitled, Indiculum libertatis de Oswaldes-Lawes-Hundred. DOmino meo charissimo Regi Anglorum Edgaro, ego Oswaldus Wigorniensis Ecclesiae Episcopus, etc. Quare quomodo fidos mihi subditos telluribus quae meae traditae sunt potestati per spatium temporis, trium hominum id est duorum post se haeredum, condonarem, placuit tam mihi quam ipsis fautoribus & consiliariis meis, cum ipsius Domini mei regis licentia & attestatione, ut fratribus meis successoribus scil. Episcopis per Chirographi cautionem apertius enuclearem, ut sciant quid ab eis extorquere juste debeant secundum conventionem cum eis factam, & sponsionem suam; unde & hanc Epistolam ob cautelae causam componere studui, nequis malignae cupiditatis instinctu hoc sequenti tempore mutare volens, abjurare a servitio Ecclesiae queat. Haec itaque conventio cum eis facta est, ipso Domino meo Rege annuente, & sua attestatione munificentae suae largitatem roborante & confirmante, omnibusque ipsius regiminis sapientibus & principibus attestantibus & consentientibus, hoc pacto eis terras Sanctae Ecclesiae sub me tenere concessi: Hoc est ut omnis Equitandi lex ab eis impleatur, quae ad Equites pertinet, & ut pleniter persolvant omnia quae ad jus ipsius Ecclesiae juste competunt, scil. ea quae Anglice dicuntur Ciricsceott & Toll, id est thelonium, & Tacc id est swinseade, & caetera jura Ecclesiae, nisi Episcopus alicui eorum quid pardonare voluerit, seseque quamdiu ipsas terras tenent in mandatis Pontificis humiliter cum omni subjectione perseverare etiam jurejurando affirment. Super haec etiam ad omnis industriae Episcopi indigentiam semet ipsos praesto impendant, Equos praestent, ipsi Equitent, & ad totum piramiticum opus Ecclesiae calcis atque ad Pontis aedificum ultro inveniantur parati. Sed & Venationis sepem Domini Episcopi ultronei ad aedificandum repperiantur, suaque quandocunque Domino Episcopo libuerit Venabula destinent Venatum. Insuper ad multas alias indigentiae causas quibus opus est Domino Antistiti saepe furnisci, sive ad suum servitium sive ad regale explendum: semper illius Archiductoris dominatui & voluntati qui Episcopatui praesidet, propter beneficium quod illis praestitum est, cum omni humilitate & subjectione subditi fiant, secundum ipsius voluntatem, & terrarum quas quisque possidet quantitatem. Decurso autem praefati temporis curriculo, viz. duorum qui post eos qui eas mode possident haeredum vitae spatio, in ipsius Antistitis sit arbitrio, quid inde velit, & quomodo sui velle sit inde ita stet, sive ad suum opus eas retinere si sic sibi utile judicaverit, sive eas alicui diutius praestare, si sic sibi placuerit, velit, ita duntaxat ut semper Ecclesiae servitia pleniter (ut praefati sumus) inde persolvantur. Ast si quid praefatorum delicti praevaricantis causa defuerit jurum; praevaricationis delictum secundum quod Praesulis jus est, emendet: aut illo quo antea potitus est dono & terra careat. Siquis vero Diabolo instigante, etc. The import of the Charter. The sum of all aforesaid is, that the Bishop's Tenant shall pay and do as followeth. First, That they shall perform all duties that belong to Horsemen. That they shall pay all things that are due unto the Church, and perform all other rights that belong to it. That they shall swear to be in all humble subjection at the command of the Bishop, as long as they shall hold these lands of him. That as often as the occasion of the Bishops shall so require, they shall present themselves to be ready for it, and shall both furnish him with Horses and ride themselves. That of their own accord they shall be ready to perform all the work about the Steeple of that Church, and for the building of Castles and Bridges. That they shall readily help to fence in the Bishop's Parks, and to furnish him with Hunting weapons, when he goeth a hunting. That in many other cases when the occasion of the Lord Bishop shall require, whether it be for his own service or for the King's service, they shall in all humbleness and subjection be obedient to the chief Captain or Leader of the Bishopric, for the * Or Fee granted. benefit done unto them, and the quantity of land which every one of them possesseth. That after the expiration of the three lives, the land shall return again to the Bishopric. That if there be any defect in performing the premises by reason that some shall vary or break the agreement, the Delinquent shall make satisfaction according to the justice of the Bishop, or shall forfeit the land which he had of his gift. I suppose that this was the common manner of grants and reservations in those times, and that they were not made otherwise than for life or three lives, for so I find them in the Abby-books. And I also suppose that they to whom these lands were granted, were the Thani Episcopi & Thani Ecclesiae, spoken of in Doomsday-book, and that the lands themselves were such as in the same book are usually called Thain-lands, Ecclesiae, Episcopi and Abbatis. But I see they were laden with many services which the lands of the King's Thane, in respect of his dignity and person, were free from. Therefore when this very Bishop by another Charter granted tres cassatas, three hides of land in Cungle, cuidam Ministro Regis, to one of the King's Thanes named Alfwold, and to his Mother (if she survived) during their lives: he put no service upon the King's Thane, but saith plena glorietur libertate, excepta expeditione rata, Pontis arcisve constructione: the common exception in grants unto the King's Thanes as before appear; and yet the services thereby excepted belonged not either to the Bishop or the King himself, otherwise than pro bono publico and common necessity. After all this I beat still upon the old string, that here yet is nothing to prove Wardship or Marriage, or (as the law then stood) a Tenure by Knights-service: for we have made it manifest that Expedition and building of Castles and Bridges were no Feodal services nor grew by Tenure. And as for these that were tied to ride and go up and down with their Lord, Baraterius an old 1 Lib. de Fend. Cap. 1. p. 8. Feudist saith, that a Knight's fee may be given so ut Vassallus in diebus Festivis cum uxore Domini ad Ecclesiam vadat, and the feudal law itself inferreth as much, Lib. 2. Tit. 3. But our Bracton speaking of our Law here in England (de Invest. feud.) in his time touching such Tenants, calleth them Rodknights alias Radknights, Lib. 2. Cap. 35. nu. 6. ut siquis debeat equitare cum Domino suo de Manerio in Manerium; and saith not that it is Knight-service, but that it is a Serjantie, and that although such sometimes do Homage, yet the Lord shall not have Ward and Marriage. Admit notwithstanding that it were Knight-service, and that the lands thus holden were Knights Fees during the life of the Tenant, yet where is the Wardship, Marriage and Relief? Who shall undergo these servitudes, since the Tenure and all the services are determined with the life of the Tenant? CHAP. XXVII. Inducements to the Conclusion. SEeing then that neither the greater Thanes nor the lesser Thanes among the Saxons were subject to the rules of our Knight-service: upon whom then (if it were in use among them) did it lie? For as touching the Clergy it is said in the Laws of Edw. the Confessor, cap. 11. that the King and the people magis in Ecclesiae confidebant Orationibus quam in Armorum defensionibus. And the Report itself confesseth (pag. 3. in pede) That the possessions of Bishops and Abbots were first made subject to Knight-service in Capite by William the Conqueror in the fourth year of his reign: for their lands were held in the times of the Saxons, In pura & libera eleemosyna, free ab omni servitio seculari, etc. Though this be not true in the latter part, (being strictly taken,) for no doubt their lands were subject to the Trinodi necessitati, viz. Expeditioni, pontis arcisque constructioni (as before appeareth,) yet cometh it very fitly to my purpose: for hereby it is evident that if the Trinodis necessitas made no Tenure by Knight-service or in Capite in the Church Lands, than neither did it in the Thanelands (as before we have showed) and then much less in the land of Churls and Husbandmen commonly called the Socmanni; for it is agreed on all hands that their lands were holden no otherwise than by Socage. Therefore if all Kent in the Saxon's time were Gavelkind, then could there be no Tenors by Knight-service in all that County. For Glanvil (Lib. 7. c. 3.) telleth us, That where the inheritance is divideable among the sons, it is Socage: And his reason is, because that where 'tis holden by Knight-service the Primogenitus succedit in toto. This Kentish custom was ab initio the general Law of England, and of all Nations, Jews, Prov. 17. 2 Greeks, Romans, and the rest, and so continueth even till this day, where the Feodal Law hath not altered it; which first happened here in England, when the Normans introducing their Feuds settled the whole inheritance of them upon the eldest son, which the ancient Feodal Law itself did not (as we before have noted) till Feuds were grown perpetual. The reason as I take it that begat this alteration, was for that while the Feud did descend in Gavelkind to the Sons and Nephews of the Feodatorie, the services were suspended till the Lord had chosen which of the Sons he would have for his Tenant, and then it was uncertain whether the party chosen would accept of the Feud or not; for sometimes there might be reasons to refuse it. To return where I left; it makes to the proof of all this that has been said, and (for conclusion) seems to be unanswerable, that the old inheritance which in the Saxons time belonged to the Crown, called in Doomsday Terra Regis, and in the Law books Ancient Demesne, containing a great part of every County, had not any Lands within it (or within any Manor thereof) holden by Knight-service. For Fitz-Herbert 1 Nat. br. dr●it. case 13. D. saith, that Nul terres sont ancient demesne forsque terres tenus en Socage. And therefore if the Tenant in ancient Demesne will claim to hold of the Lord by Knights-service, it is good cause to remove the Plea, because that no Lands holden of a Manor which is ancient Demesne are holden by other services of the Lord than by Socage: for the Tenants in ancient Demesne are called Socmanni, that is to say, Tenants deal carve, Angl. le plough. Thus far Fitz-Herbert. Now if in the Manors of the King himself, there were then no Lands holden by Knight-service throughout all England, it will then in all probability follow, that there were none likewise among his Subjects in the Saxons time, and consequently that our Feudal Law was not introduced before the Conquest. Mr. Cambden by their own confession is of the same opinion; and Mr. Selden himself, whom they allege against me, is clearly with me; as before I have showed. If these our three opinions avail nothing, we have yet a fourth to strengthen Bracton. us, great Bracton the most learned in our ancient Laws and Customs, that hath been in this Kingdom; who speaking of Forinsecum servitium as the Genus to these Tenors, saith, Lib. 2. cap. 16. Nu. 7. fol. 36. a. that it was called regale servitium, quia spectat ad Dominum Regem, & non ad alium, & secundum quod in Conquestu fuit adinventum. Here Bracton also refers the Invention to the Conquest, but the Report waveth his opinion as well as ours, notwithstanding his great knowledge, and that he lived nearer to the Conquest by two third parts of the time than we do. Black book of the Exchequer. Well, there is yet an elder, and one that might see some that lived in the Conqueror's time, the Author of the Black-book of the Chequer: who speaking of the Saxon Laws and those of the Conqueror saith, Cap. 16. fol. 16. b. Quasdam reprobavit, quasdam autem approbans, illis transmarinas Neustriae (id est Normanniae) leges quae ad regni pacem tuendam efficacissimae videbantur, adjecit. What were those Neustrian Laws or what could they be (in all the books of the Law) for preserving peace, save Military Tenors? And the Exchequer itself, where the cognisance of all these Tenors lieth, was brought in also by the Conqueror. But Ingulphus the Abbot of Croyland, lived long in the Conqueror's time, and was one of his Domestics or Familiars, as he termeth himself. And by him it appeareth that the Conqueror not only generally dispossessed the Saxons and gave their lands to his Normans and others, but changed also their manner of conveyance, the form of their Charters, and the course of making Knights, whereupon all the rules of Knight-service have since depended, See his words p. 901. For at that time Miles & per militiam tenens were all one by glanvil's testimony, Lib. 7. ca 3. p. 49. But when all fails, I hope they will believe the Conqueror himself, who in a Charter of his Laws and a great Council of the Kingdom, which we now call a Parliament, published by Mr. Lambard, useth these words. Statuimus & sirmiter praecipimus, ut omnes Comites, & Barones, & Milites, & servientes, & universi liberi homines totius Regni nostri praedicti, habeant & teneant se semper bene in armis, & in Equis, ut decet & oportet. Et quod sint semper prompti & parati ad servitium suum integrum nobis explendum & peragendum, cum semper opus adfuerit, secundum quod nobis debent de feodis & Tenementis suis de jure, facere, & sicut illis statuimus per commune consilium totius regni nostri praedicti, & illis dedimus & concessimus in feodis jure haereditatio. Hoc praeceptum non sit violatum ullo modo super forisfacturam plenam. Here the word statuimus, etc. showeth that it was the Conqueror's institution, and concessimus in feodis jure haereditario, implieth that Feuds were not hereditary before this grant. But there may lie the same objection against it which myself made against the like in Edw. the Confessor's Laws, that it is in a differing letter from the rest of the Text, and not found in the Copy left unto us by Roger Hoveden. I acknowledge it, but I see that here every thing agreeth with the Manners, Laws, Time, and Idiom of the Conqueror. And I conceive that it is fallen out as it did of old in the Councils of Nice and Sardis, and many other too, several Councils to be joined together. For Hoveden mentioneth his Copy to be Decretum in civitate Claudia, that is Gloster: but Lambard his, to be in civitate Londra, London: so that they seem two several Constitutions made at several times and places, and here put together into one. Howsoever it be, 'tis very observable; for it discovereth that which elsewhere we meet not with so perspicuously related, That the great dignities of Earls and Barons or Ministerial Thanes, which before were arbitrable or but for life, and those also of the lesser sort (which enjoyed the Knight's Fees no otherwise than in the same manner) were either now erected with us or made hereditary, according to the testimony of the Feodal Law before recited. Till now therefore there could no Wardship, Marriage, Relief, or other Feodal servitudes (thereupon depending) be amongst us; nor could the word feodum be taken for haereditas, the one being formerly contrary to the other. For Cujacius and the Feudists, Feud. Lib. 2. Tit. 17. p. 166. make proprietas, alodium, & haereditas to be all one in Feodal sense; and feodum to be contrary to them all, as res alienae proprietatis, servituti obnoxia, & successionis coercitae; and being until this time not hereditary but arbitrable. The course being thus changed by the Conqueror, was presently pursued here in England according to the Norman manner as appeareth in Doomsday, where it is said, Habet— in eodem Feudo de W. Comite Radulpho de Limbs. 50 carucat▪ terrae sicut fit in Normannia. He joineth Normannia with Feudum, as to show us whence it came, and where we should see the pattern of it. Hides disused. The old Saxon manner of dividing the Kingdom by Hides, and levying Soldiers according to the Hides, grew now out of use; and instead thereof the King's wars to be supplied by Knights Fees, the number whereof shortly after were accounted, as Sprott the Monk of Canterbury relateth, to 60215. and of them he saith 28115. were in the Clergies hand. The Normans also changed the name of an Hyde of Land and called it Carruè a Plough land, and as it seemeth in erecting and laying forth their Knight's Fees, assigned ordinarily two Carrues or Plough land to a Knights Fee. For 'tis noted out of the Black Register of St. Edmunds-Bury, that Will. the Conqueror gave to Baldwin then Abbot there, octoginta carucatas terrae unde feodaret quadraginta Milites. And according to the rate of so much land in those times, is a Knight's Fee at this day valued in the Law books but at five pounds. CHAP. XXVIII. The Conclusion. I Will wander no further in this argument; I suppose I may be bold (out of that which is already said) to conclude that I was not mistaken in referring the original of our Feuds in England to the Norman Conquest: and that my conjecture doth not cross the force of any Law. But now I come to an end, I must discover a great mistaking committed by him that drew the Breviate for the Reverend Judges; for he hath made us all on both sides, like Pan in Ovid, to touse a Reed-sheaf instead of Syrinx, or like Ixion to embrace a Cloud instead of Juno, to labour much about a surmised assertion of his own, instead of that which I delivered. The truth is, I have no where referred the original of Feuds in England to the Norman Conquest. Nay, when I spoke of them, I said habentur plurima, quae apprime huc conducunt in Anglo Saxonum nostrorum legibus, and this I still affirm; but my words which he hath much perverted are these, Feodorum servitutes in Britanniam nostram primus invexit Gulielmus senior. It was neither my words nor my meaning to say, that he first brought in either Feuds or Military service in a general sense, but that he brought in the Servitudes and Grievances of Feuds, viz. Wardship, Marriage, and such like, which to this day were never known to other Nations that are governed by the Feodal Law. There is great difference between servitia Militaria and servitutes Militares: The one, Heroick, Noble and full of Glory, which might not therefore be permitted in old time to any that was not born of free parents; no, not to a King's son (as appeareth in Virgil,) wherein our Saxons also were very cautelous, and accounted a Soldier's shield to be insigne libertatis: the other, not ignoble only and servile, but derived even from very bondage. Let not this offend: I will say no more. 30. Julii 1639. FINIS. Two Discourses: I. Of the ancient GOVERNMENT of England. II. Of PARLIAMENTS. By Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. Published from the Original Manuscripts. Sapientia, & disciplina, & scientia Legum apud Deum: Dilectio & via bonorum apud eum. Wisdom, and knowledge, and understanding of the Law are of God: and Love and good works come of him. Ecclus. 11. 15. OF THE Ancient Government OF ENGLAND. TO tell the Government of England under the old Saxon Laws, seemeth an Utopia to us present; strange and uncouth: yet can there be no period assigned, wherein either the frame of those Laws was abolished, or this of ours entertained; but as day and night creep insensibly one upon the other, so also hath this alteration grown upon us unsensibly, every age altering something, and no age seeing more than what themselves are actors in, nor thinking it to have been otherwise than as themselves discover it by the present. Like them of China, who never travailing out of their own Country; think the whole world to extend no further. As one therefore that hath coasted a little further into former times, I will offer unto you a rude Map thereof; not like those of the exquisite Cosmographers of our later ages, but like them of old, when as neither cross sails nor compass, were yet known to Navigators. Our Saxons, though divided into many Kingdoms, yet were they all one in effect, in Manners, Laws, and Language; so that the breaking of their Government into many Kingdoms, or the reuniting of their Kingdoms into a Monarchy, wrought little or no change amongst them touching Laws. For though we talk of the West-Saxon law, the Mercian law, and the Dane law, whereby the west parts of England, the middle parts, and those of Norfolk, Suffolk, and the north, were severally governed; yet held they all an uniformity in substance, differing rather in their mulct than in their Canea, that is in the quantity of Fines and Amercements, than in the course and frame of Justice. Therefore, when all these Kingdoms grew into one Monarchy, as under Alured, Ethelstane, Edgar, &c, this bred no notable innovation in any of them; for the King had no new Law to impose upon his new Subjects, nor were his new Subjects unacquainted with his form of Government; having always lived according to the same. So that when Edward the Confessor came to take away these small differences that were between these three Laws, he did it even in these fickle and unconstant times without all tumult or contradiction; making that his alteration famous rather by the new name, than by the new matter. For abolishing the three particular names beforementioned, he now called it the Common Law of England, for that no part of the Kingdom should henceforth be governed by any particular Law, but all alike by a Common Law. But insomuch as this Common Law is but the half Arch of the Government, tending only to the Temporal part thereof, and not unto the Ecclesiastical; I cannot well present the one without the other, and must therefore make a project of the whole Arch, that so the strength and uniformity of both the parts may the better be conceived. As therefore each side of an Arch descendeth alike from the Coane or top-point; so both the parts of that their Government was alike deduced from the King, each of them holding correspondency one with the other (like two loving Sisters) both in aspect, and in lineaments. To begin with the right side or eldest Sister: the Estate Ecclesiastical was first divided into Provinces: Every Province into many Bishoprics: Every Bishopric into many Archdeaconries: Every Arch-Deaconry into divers Deaneries: Every Deanery into many Parishes. And all these committed to their several Governors; Parsons, Deans, Arch-Deacons, Bishops and Arch-Bishops; who, as subordinate one to the other, did not only execute the charge of these their several portions: but were Accoumptant also for the same to their Superiors. The Parson as ima species, was to hear and determine the breaches of God's peace, of love, and charity, within his parish: to reprove the inordinate life of his parishioners: and tho' he could not strike with the Ecclesiastical sword, yet might he shake it against them by enjyoning notorious offenders to contrition, repentance, satisfaction; and sometime by removing them from the blessed Sacrament. The Dean, to take cognisance of the life and conversation of the Parsons and Clergymen of every Parish within his Deanery: to censure breach of Church-peace, and to punish incontinent and infamous livers by excommunication, penance, etc. And because there could be no breach of the King's peace; but it must also break the peace and unity of the Church; the Bishop's Dean, in whose Deanery the peace was broken, had in some cases 10s. for his part of the mulct, or fine thereof; as appeareth Ll. Ed. Confess. cap. 31. The Archdeacon, drawing nearer to the Bishop, drew the more preeminence from him, and was his coadjutor in the ordination of Clerks, having a superintendent power over all Parochial Parsons within every Deanery of his precinct. The Bishop, as the greatest orb of the Diocese, had jurisdiction and coercion through the same, in all Ecclesiastical causes, and on all persons; except Monasteries exempted 1 Can. Apost. ca 38 . And for this purpose had two general Synods in the year, wherein all the Clergy of his Diocese assembled for determining matters touching the Church, as well in faith, as in Government. But the Archbishop (to bind up this golden faggot in the band of Union and Conformity) 2 Archi●pis. super 12 Epis●. Greg. Angu. Bed. So a Dung 12. Com. comprehended all the Bishops of his Province sub pallio suae plenitudinis, or sub plenitudine potestatis; having supreme jurisdiction to visit and reform in all their Dioceses whatsoever was defective or omitted. That by this means no transgression might break through so many wards, but if it escaped the Sword of Hasael, Jehu might slay it; or if it passed them both, yet Elisha might light upon it. This was the model of the Church policy; composed no doubt out of that fundamental rule of Government prescribed by Jethro unto Moses: Appoint rulers over thousands, over hundreds, over fifties, and over ten. According to the steps whereof the State Temporal did likewise take her lineaments. For the Temporal Government was likewise divided into Satrapies or Dukedoms, which contained in them divers Counties; the County divers Laths or Trithings; every Trithing divers Hundreds or Wapentakes; every Hundred divers Towns or Lordships, shortly after called Baronies. And the Government of all these were committed to their several Heads; viz. Towns or Manors to the Lords thereof, whom the Saxons called Theings, after Barons; Hundreds to the Lords of the Hundreds: Trithings or Laths to their Trithingreves; Counties to their Earls or Aldermen; and the larger Satrapies to their Dukes or chief Princes. All which had subordinate Authority one under the other; and did within the precinct of their own Territories minister justice unto their Subjects. For the Theinge or Lord of the Town, (whom the Normans called a Baron) had of old Jurisdiction over them of his own Town, (being as it were his Colony;) and as Cornelius Tacitus saith, did Agricolis suis jus dicere. For those whom we now call Tenants, were in those ancient times but Husbandmen dwelling upon the soil of the Lord, and manuring the same, on such conditions, as the Lord assigned; or else such as were their followers in the wars, and had therefore portions of ground appointed unto them in respect of that service; which portion was thereupon called a Knights-fee, for that a servant in the war, whom the Saxons called a Knight, had it allotted unto him as the fee, or wages of his service. Neither at the first had they these their fees, but at the Lord's pleasure, or for a time limited; and therefore both these kinds of Military and Husbandmen dwelling upon the Town or Colony of the Lord, were (as in reason they ought) under the censure and will of their Lord touching the lands they ocucpyed; who therefore set them laws and customs, how and in what manner they should possess these their lands▪ and as any controversy rose about them, the Lord assembling the rest of his followers, did by their opinion and assistance judge it. Out of which usage, the Court-Barons took their beginning, and the Lords of Towns and Manors gained the privilege of holding plea and jurisdiction within those their Territories over their Tenants and followers; who thereupon are at this day called Sectatores, in French Suitres, of suiure to follow. But the Saxons themselves called this jurisdiction sacha and soca, signifying thereby Causarum actionem and libertatem judicandi; for sacha signifieth causa, in which sense we yet use it, as when we say, For God's sake; and soca signifieth liberty or privilege, as Cyri●socne, libertas Ecclesiae. But by this manner the Lords of Towns (as ex con●●etudine Regni) came to have jurisdiction over their Tenants and followers, and to hold plea of all things touching land. But as touching cognizance in criminal matters, they had not otherwise to meddle therewith than by the King's Charters. For as touching the King's peace, every Hundred was divided into many Freeborgs or Tithings consisting of ten men, which stood all bound one for the other, and did amongst themselves punish small matters in their Court for that purpose, called the let; which was sometime granted over to the Lords of Manors, and sometime exercised by peculiar officers. But the greater things were also carried from thence into the Hundred Courts; so that both the streams of Civil justice, and of Criminal, did there meet, and were decided by the Hundreds, &c, as by superior Judges both to the Court Baron, and Court Leet also. Edward the Confessor (Ll. ca 32.) saith, that there were Justices over every ten Freeborgs, called Deans, or Tienheofod, (that is, head of ten) which among their Neighbours in Towns compounded matters of trespasses done in pastures, Meadows, Corn, and other strifes rising among them. But the greater matters, saith he, were referred to superior Justices appointed over every ten of them, whom we may call Centurions, Centenaries, or Hundradors, because they judged over an hundred Freeborgs. The Lord of the Hundred therefore had jurisdiction over all the Towns of the Hundred, as well in Criminal matters, as in Civil; and they that failed of their right in the Court Barons, Tithings, or Leets, might now prosecute it here before the Lord of the Hundred, and his followers, called the Suitors of the Hundred, which were the Lords and owners of lands within that Hundred: who were tied to be there at every Court 1 Ll. Edgar cap. 5. ; which as appeareth by the Laws of H. I. ca 8. was to be holden twelve times in the year, that is, once every month: 2 Ll. H. I. cap. 9 But especially a full appearance was required twice in the year; in memory whereof the Suitors are at this day called at our Lady and Michaelmass Courts, by the Steward of the Hundred. These (as I said before) held piea of trespasses done in Pastures, Meadows, Corn and such like, and of other strifes arising between Neighbour and Neighbour, and (as by and by also shall be showed) of Criminal matters, touching the very life of a man. Decrevit tum porro Aluredus, etc. King Alured then further decreed, that every Freeman should be settled in some Hundred and appointed to some Freeborg or Tithing, (as did also Canutus Ll. par. 2. cap. 19) and that the heads of these Tithings or Freeborg (whom we now call Capitales plegii) should judge the smaller matters (as in Leets, etc.) but should reserve the greater for the Hundred Court; and those of most difficulty, to the Alderman and Sheriff in the County Court, Lamb. voc. Centuria. The order of which proceedings in the Hundred Court do there also appear out of the Laws of King Ethelred made in a great Assembly at Vanatinge Cap. 4. In singulis Centuriis Comitia sunto, etc. Let the Courts be holden in every Hundred, and let twelve men of the elder sort together with the Reve (of the Hundred) holding their hands upon some holy thing, take their oath that they shall neither condemn any man that is innocent, nor quit him that is guilty. And it seemeth by the Laws of Canutus, (par. 2. cap. 16. & 18.) That a man was not to be delayed above three Court days from having his right: for if he were, he might then resort to the County; and if he obtained it not there within four Courts, than he might seek unto the King. And no doubt, but this Law opened a great gap for the carrying of matters from the Hundred and County Courts up to the King's Court. The Jurisdiction also of this Court seemeth to be further abated by H. I. who, tho' he established the ancient manner of holding it; yet pulled he from it some principal parts thereof; as after shall appear in a Writ of his, touching this and the County Court, directed to the Sheriff of Worcester, (MS. Co. pa. inter 48. & 49.) The Thrithingreve or Leidgreve (whom I take to be the same called in the Salic Laws Tungimus; but doubt whether he or no, that in our Laws of H. I. is called Thungrevius) was an officer that had authority over the third part of the County, or three or more Hundreds, or Wapentakes; whose Territory was thereupon called a Thrithing, otherwise a Leid or Lath; in which manner the County of Kent is yet divided: and the Rapes in Sussex seem to answer the same: And perhaps the Ridings also of Yorkshire; being now corruptly so called for Tridings or Thrithing. Those things therefore that could not be determined in the Hundred-Courts either for difficulty or miscarriage thereof; were from thence brought unto the Trithing: where all the principal men of three or more Hundreds being assembled, did debate and determine it: or if they could not, did then send it up nnto the County Court to be there decided, as in Parliament, by the whole body of the County. This appeareth by the Laws of Edward the Confessor (Cap. 34.) where it is said, Erant & aliae potestates super Wapentachia, quas vocabant ðriðingas, etc. that is, There were other Jurisdictions over Wapentakes (or Hundreds) which they called Thrithings, because they contained a third part of the Province (or County.) And those that governed these Thrithings, were thereupon called Thrithingreves: before whom were brought all causes that could not be determined in the Wapentakes or Hundreds. Tho' I find no such division of our County of Norfolk; yet I see the use thereof remained there, both till and after the times of the Conquest. For William Rufus in a controversy of the Abbot of Ramsie's about the Town of Holme in Norfolk, sent his Writ to H. Chamberlain then Trithingreve, (as it seemeth) over that part of the County, commanding him to assemble three Hundreds and an half at a place called Fli●ham-burrough, (which to this day beareth that name, and is the site of the Hundred of Frebridge) there to determine the said controversy: which Writ for reviewing of the ancient customs of the Kingdom, I will here adjoin, as it standeth in the book of Ramsey Abbey, Sect. 197. Willielmus Rex Angl. H. Camerario salutem: Fac convenire & consedere tres Hundredos & dimidium apud Flicceham-Burgh propter terram illam de Holm quae pertinet ad Ringstedam, & quam Abbas Ramesiae reclamat ad victum & vestitum Monachorum suorum: Et si Abbas poterit ostendere ratione & testimonio Comprovincialium, quod antecessor illius eandem terram habuerit eo die quo pater meus fuit vivus & mortuus, tunc praecipio ut illam terram, & omnia quae just pertinent ad Abbathiam suam pacifice & honorifice habeat. Teste R. Bigod apud Wind. Out of which Writ I conjecture that this H. Camerarius to whom it was directed, might be Trithingreve of that part of the County; the rather for that the Writ nameth him not Vicecomes as in the next precedent it doth another man, viz. Will. Rex, O. Vicecomiti salutem, etc. And that these three Hundreds and an half were to be Judges of the cause, it appeareth by the words fac consedere, that is, cause them to sit down together. For Magistrorum & Judicum est sedere, famulorum & Ministrorum stare. Therefore it is said, Exod. 18. 13. Moses sat to judge the people, and the people stood about him: whereupon Hugo also noteth, Magistrorum est sedere. To this purpose also is the Law of H. I. ca 8. Si aliquis in Hundr●… agendorum penuria * 〈…〉 cum. judicium, vel casu aliquo transferendum sit in d●us vel tres vel amplius Hundredos respectetur justo fine claudendum. (Qu.) But it seemeth that these Judges were sworn to do right, as well as those before mentioned in the Hundred Court. And that our course now used for taking a Jury out of many Hundreds in the County, for trial of a cause arising in one Hundred, took the beginning from the trial in the Trithing, and that thereupon the Trithing Court grew out of use. The Alderman of the County, whom confusedly they call an Earl, was in parallel equal with the Bishop, and therefore both their estimations valued alike in the Laws of Ethelstane at eight thousand Thrymses. He was a man learned in the Laws, and had the government of the whole Shire, and cognizance over all inferior Courts and persons, both in civil matters and criminal. For which purpose he held his ordinary Court by the Shreve, 1 Ll. Edw. signior. ca ult. once every month: and there resorted as Suitors, and bound by duty, all the Lords of Manors, and principal men of the County, with the rest of the Freeholders', who were not only assistants, but Judges with him of all matters there depending, whether entered there originally, or coming thither by appeal or provocation from the inferior Courts. Ll. Edw. senioris, cap. ult. Ic ƿille ðat aelc geresa hebbe gemote, etc. I will that every Sheriff hold his Court about every four weeks, and that he do right equally to every man, and make an end of all Suits, under the pain before expressed. As the Bishop had twice in the year two general Synods wherein all the Clergy of his Diocese of all sorts were tied to resort for matters concerning the Church; so also was there twice in the year a general assembly of all the Shire for matters concerning the Commonwealth; wherein, without exception, all kind of Estates were required to be present, Dukes, Earls, Barons, and so downward, of the Laity; and especially the Bishop of that Diocese among the Clergy. For in those days the Temporal Lords did often sit in Synod with the Bishops, and the Bishops in like manner in the Courts of the Temporalty, and were therein (as by and by shall appear) not only necessary, but principal Judges themselves; Ll. Canuti Regis, par. 2. ca 17. The Shyre-gemot (for so the Saxons called this assembly of the whole Shire) shall be kept twice a year (and oftener if need require) wherein the Bishop and the Alderman of the Shire shall be present; the one to teach the Laws of God, the other the Law of the Land. This great assembly was by the Laws of Ethelstan (ca 20.) to be proclaimed or published a seven-night before hand; and every man tied thereupon to be present at it, and in the mean time either to satisfy the wrong he had done to another, or to undergo the penalty; which if he refused, all he had was presently to be sensed, and himself put to find sureties for his appearance to answer. But because this notable assembly (otherwise called by the Authors of that time Mallum and Placitum generale) was the supreme Court of County-Justice, wherein all things of what sort soever were to be determined: we will take a little scope in description thereof: Showing first more particularly, who were bound to give their attendance here: Then, what lay in cognizance of this Court: And thirdly, in what steps they proceeded to the determination of the same. All which, because they cannot be more authentically delivered, then out of the Law itself; I will even from thence report it as it standeth in Ll. H. I. ca 8. Sicut antiqua fuerat institutione formatum, etc. As it was devised by an ancient institution, and confirmed by true report, that the general pleas of the Counties ought to be assembled in every Province of England at certain places, and before certain Judges, at certain times thereto appointed; and that none should be put to further trouble unless the King's own necessity, or the common good of the Kingdom required it: Therefore the Bishops, Earls, Sheriffs, Heretoches or Marshals of Armies, Trithingreves, Leidgreves, Lieutenants, Hundredors', Aldermen, Magistrates, Reves, Barons, Vavasors, Thungreves and other Lords of land, must be all diligently attending (at these Assemblies) lest that the lewdness of offenders, the misdemeanour Gravionum (i of Sheriffs) and the ordinary corruption of Judges escaping unpunished, make a miserable spoil of the people. First, let the laws of true Christianity (which we call the Ecclesiastical) be fully executed with due satisfaction; then let the pleas concerning the King be dealt with; and lastly, those between party and party; and whomsoever the Church-Synod shall find at variance, let them either make an accord between them in love, or sequester them by their sentence of excommunication, etc. Whereby it appeareth, that Ecclesiastical causes were at that time under the cognizance of this Court. But I take them to be such Ecclesiastical causes, as were grounded upon the Ecclesiastical laws made by the Kings themselves for the government of the Church (for many such there were almost in every King's time,) and not for matters rising out of the Roman Canons, which haply were determinable only before the Bishop and his Ministers. To proceed. Before they entered into any causes (as it is commanded in the Laws of Canutus which we mentioned, par. 2. ca 17.) the Bishop (to use the term of our time which from hence taketh the original) gave a solemn charge unto the people touching Ecclesiastical matters; opening unto them the rights and reverence of the Church, and their duty therein towards God and the King, according to the word of God and Divinity. Then the Alderman in like manner related unto them the Laws of the land, and their duty towards God, the King, and Commonwealth, according to the rule and tenure thereof. Of all which, because I find a notable precedent in a Synodal Edict made by Carolus Calvus Emperor and King of France, (in Concil. Carissiaco. An. Dom. 856.) I will here add it, not to show that our Saxons took their form of government from the French; but that both the French and they, as brethren descending from one parent, the Germane, kept the rights and laws of their natural Country. Episcopi quinque in suis parochiis, & Missi in illorum Missaticis, Comitesque in eorum Comitatibus pariter placita teneant, quo omnes Reipub. Ministri, & Vassi Dominici, omnesque quicunque vel quorumcunque homines in iisdem parochiis & Comitatibus sine ulla personaram acceptione & excusatione, aut dilatione conveniant, etc. That is, The Bishops in their parishes (or Dioceses) and the Justice's Itinerant or Aldermen in their Circuits, and the Earls in their Counties, shall hold their pleas together: whereunto all Ministers and Officers of the Commonwealth, all the King's Barons and all other whatsoever they be, or whose Tenants soever they be within the same parishes or Counties, without any respect of persons, excuse, or delay, shall assemble together: And the Bishop of that parish or Diocese, having briefly noted sentences touching the matter out of the Evangelists, Apostles, and Prophets, shall read them to the people, and also the decrees Apostolic, and Canons of the Church; and in open and plain terms shall instruct them all, what manner, and how great a sin it is to violate or spoil the Church, and what and how great penance, and what merciless and severe punishment it requireth; with other accustomed, necessary and profitable admonishments. The Aldermen also, or Justices, shall note down such sentences of law as they call to mind; and shall publish unto them the Constitutions of us and our predecessors, Kings and Emperors, gathered together touching this matter. And the Bishops by the Authority of God and the Apostles; and the Aldermen or Justices, and Earls, under the penalty of the King's Laws; shall, with all the care they can, prohibit every man of the Kingdom from making any prey or spoil of the Church, etc. OF PARLIAMENTS. WHEN States are departed from their original Constitution, and that original by tract of time worn out of memory; the succeeding Ages viewing what is passed by the present, conceive the former to have been like to that they live in, and framing thereupon erroneous propositions, do likewise make thereon erroneous inferences and Conclusions. I would not pry too boldly into this ark of secrets: but having seen more Parliaments miscarry, yea suffer shipwreck, within these sixteen years past, than in many hundred heretofore, I desire for my understanding's sake to take a view of the beginning and nature of Parliaments; not meddling with them of our time, (which may displease both Court and Country,) but with those of old; which now are like the siege of Troy, matters only of story and discourse. Because none shall go beyond me in this argument, I will begin with the foundation of Kingdoms, which of necessity must be more ancient than Parliaments, for that a Parliament is the grand Council of the Kingdom assembled at the commandment of the King, for advice in matters of State. Our first labour is then, to see what this Grand-Council was originally. It is confessed on all hands, that the King is universal Lord of his whole Territories, and that no man possesseth any part thereof, but derived from him either mediately or immediately. This derivation thus proceeded. The King in the beginning divided his whole territory into two parts, one to be manured by his own Tenants and Husbandmen; then called Socmen. For the Kings of England used in those days to stock their grounds themselves, like the Kings of Israel; and by the profits thereof especially, to maintain their Hospitality, their Court, and Estate; having in every Manor Officers and Servants for that purpose. This part was Sacrum Patrimonium the inseparable inheritance of the Crown, called in Doomsday Terra Regis, and in Law the Ancient Demaine. And because it belonged to the husbandry of the King, all that manured or held any part of this land, were said to be Tenants in Socage, and might not be drawn into the wars; of which nature, as touching their Tenure, they continue at this day. The other part of his whole territory he portioned out to Military men; which (tho' the other was the more profitable) yet this was always held for the more honourable, and therefore so divided this among his Nobles and chief servants and followers for supportation in his wars and Royal Estate. To some in greater measure, to others in less, according to their merit and qualities. Provinces to Dukes, Counties to Earls, Castles and Signiories unto Barons: rendering unto him, not ex pacto vel condicto (for that was but cautela superabundans) but of common right and by the Law of Nations (for so I may term the Feodal-law then to be in our Western Orb) all Feodal duties and services due from the Donees and their heirs, upon every gift, grant, and alienation; tho' no word were spoken of them. It appeareth by the Feodal-law (from whence all that part of our Common-law that concerneth Tee and Tenors hath original, and which our Common-law also affirmeth;) that there was always due ..... * H●r● is 〈…〉 it 〈…〉 that 〈◊〉 comes 〈◊〉 ●●●ms 〈…〉 from 〈…〉. Those that thus received their Territories from the King, were said to hold them in Capite, for that the King is Caput Regni, and were thereupon called Capitanei Regis and Capitanei Regni, otherwise Barones Regis, the King's men, Tenants or Vassals: who having all the land divided amongst them, saving that which the King reserved to himself as Sacrum Patrimonium, were also called Pares Regni, and were always upon commandment about the person of the King, to defend him and his Territories in war, and to counsel and advise him in peace, either Judicially in matters of Law brought before the King in his Palace, which in those days was the only place of Royal justice: or Politically in the great affairs of the Kingdom. Hereupon, they were not only 1 〈◊〉 Fran. ca 27. p. 216. called Praetorianum consilium, as belonging to the King's Palace, but Magnum concilium Regis, and Magnum concilium Regni. For that in those times, it belonged only to them, to consult with the King on State-matters and matters of the Kingdom; insomuch as no other in the Kingdom possessed any thing but under them. And therefore, as in Despotical Government, the agreement or disagreement of the Master of the Family concluded the menial and the whole Family; so the agreement and disagreement of the chief Lord or him that held in Capite, concluded all that depended on him or claimed under him, in any matter touching his Fee or Tenure. To this purpose, seemeth that in the 2 Ll. Edw. Conf. cap. 17. Laws of Edward the Confessor, ratified by the Conqueror: Debet etiam Rex omnia ritè facere in regno, & per judicium proc●rum regni. These great Lords, according to this Archetype of Government set them by the King, divided their lands in like manner among their Tenants and followers. First, they assigned a portion ad victum & vestitum suum, which they committed over to their Socmen and Husbandmen, to furnish them with Corn, Victuals, and Provision for Hospitality; and briefly, all things necessary to their domestical and civil part of life. The residue they divided into as many shares or portions as might well maintain so many Military men, whom then they called their Knights, and thereupon the shares themselves Knights-fees, i. e. stipendia militaria. And these Fees they granted over to each of their principal followers, furnishing them with so many Knights for the wars. These Grantees that received their Estates from the Barons or Capitanei and not from the King, were called Valvasores (a degree above Knights,) and were unto their Lords (the Capitanei or Barones Regis) as they the Capitanei were unto the King: and did in like manner subdivide their lands among their Socmen and Military followers, who in old time were called Valvasini; whom I take to be the same at this day that are the Lords of every Manor, if not those themselves that we call Knights, as owners of a Knights-Fee. For in this, the Feodal-law itself is doubtful and various, as of a thing lost by Antiquity or made uncertain by the differing manners of several Nations. Insomuch, that Valvasores and Valvasini grew to be confounded, and both of them at last to be out of use, and no other Military Tenors to be known amongst us, than tenere p●r Baroniam, and tenere per feodum militare. But in a 3 De tene●d. Comitatib. Charter of Henr. I. it is said: Si exurgat Placitum de divisione Terrarum, si interest Barones meos Dominicos, tractetur in Curia mea; & si inter Vavassores duorum Dominorum, tractetur in Comitatu, etc. Where the Valvasores were also, and the Barons themselves, 4 Ll. Hen. I. cap. 8. Suitors and Attendants. Bracton mentioneth them in Henry iii time, to be 5 〈…〉 c. 8. 〈◊〉 4. Viri magnae dignitatis. Nor was their memory clean gone in Richard II's days; as appeareth by Chaucer. Yet do I not find in any of our ancient Laws or Monuments, that they stood in any classic kind of Tenure, other than that we may account the Baron, Vavasor, and Knight, to be (as our Lawyers at this day term them) the Chief Lord, Mesne, and Tenant. But herein the Feodal-law of our Country differed from that of Milan and other parts. For there the Valvasini could invest (which we call infeosse) none under them in fee, that is, to hold of them by Knights-service. And with us, every Tenant Par aval might in infinitum, till the Statute of Quia Emptores Terrarum, enfeoff another by Knight-service, and to do all the services unto him, that he did to his Mesne Lord. So that by this means, a line of Knights-services might be created of a dozen, yea twenty Mean-Lords and Tenants, wherein every of them might have his prochine Tenant obliged unto him in the duties and services that his Lord Paramont, which held of the King, was to do and yield unto the King himself for the same lands, viz. Honour, Ward, Sustenance, Safety, Marriage, give keep Attendance, Relief, Counsel to Aid, Defence of his Person, Tribute, Fidelity. Defence of his Patrimony, All which in ancient time, while the Feodal-law flourished, were well understood to be comprehended under the profession of Homage and the oath of Fidelity, which every Feodal Tenant (or, as others call him, Vassal) usually did unto his Lord. Honour; 1 Lit. Lib. 2. ca 1. promised by the Tenant upon his knees in doing Homage: which tho' it be the greatest and most submiss service that a Freeman can do unto his Lord, yet the profession of it to the meanest subject is as ample and submiss; yea, in the very same words that to the King himself. Attendance; 2 Cujac. Const. Lot. Feud. pa. 284. to follow and attend him in the war at his own charge; and in peace with suit of Court. Therefore Tacitus calleth them Comites. Defence of his person; for if he forsook his Lord being in danger, it was forfeiture of life, land, and all he had. Defence of his Signiory; that nothing of his lands, rents, or services, were withholden or withdrawn. Profit by Ward, Marriage, and Relief, as they fell. Tribute by way of Aid; to make his eldest son a Knight; to marry his eldest daughter, 3 〈◊〉 Cujac. lib. 2. Feud. Tit. 7. pa. 133. ransom himself being taken prisoner; yea, in some places to be an hostage for his Lord. Sustenance; 4 Cujac. ibid. that being fallen into poverty, (according to that in the Canon law spoken of a Patron) Alatur egenus. Counsel and Advice; in which respect the Tenant was bound ordinarily once in every three weeks to come to his Lord's Court, and there as a Judge (with other of his Peers) to censure the causes of his Signiory, and to direct his Lord, as the cause occurrent did require, and always to keep his counsel. This to the meanest Lord was in the nature of the King's Great Court or Counsel, called afterward a Parlyment. Fidelity; for to all these was the Tenant by Knights-service tied by his oath of Fealty, swearing to be feal and leal: As the oath was at those times interpreted 5 Epist. Fulberti Epist. Canot. & Can. 12. q. 5. as well by Divines and Canonists, as by Feodists and Lawyers. And as these were inherent to this Tenure of Common right; so was there many other grievous exactions imposed by the Lords upon their Tenants; some by custom of the Manor; some by Composition upon granting the Fee; and many by Signioral Authority, as tho' the Lord besides his Legal Power, might do some things (like the King) by Prerogative. By Custom, 1 Doomsd. Heref Lene. when the Lord or Lady came into the Manor, the Bailiff was to present them 18 oras denar. and every of their servants 10s. with some sums of money as gratuities, ut essent laeti animo. That the Tenants should pay 32d. for every daughter they married 2 Plac. Coron. R. de Banco. . It was an ordinary custom, that Lords might take (not only of their Tenants, but of all the Country thereabout) Victuals and all other necessaries for furnishing their Castles; which how grievous it was, may well enough be conceived, tho' the Statute that restrained it, did not testify it. So other Lords took provision for their household and hospitality, within their Manors. By Composition; 3 Bracton. as to have their Tenants attend them with horse and man in their journeys; whom they called Road-knights. To present them yearly at times, Horses, Hawks, and other things of profit and pleasure. By Signioral Authority; as to lie and feast themselves and followers (called Coshering) at their Tenants houses; and when any matter of extraordinary charge fell upon them, then to extort the same amongst their Tenants; which the Irish, about forty years since, of my own knowledge still continued, calling it Cuttings, according to our old word Tallagium. But among us it was taken away by the Magna Charta of King John. I speak not of the innumerable Carriages, Angaries, and Vexations, with which they otherwise harrowed if not plagued their Tenants. Yet must I not let that pass, which every where was then in use, for Lords of Castles to imprison men at pleasure, to hold and keep distresses there against common justice, and to do many outrages all about them. Wherein the Lords of Manors imitating them, would also imprison their Tenants and followers; which Custom I saw also yet not laid down in Ireland, forty years since. For a Meane-Lord would ordinarily say upon offence taken against a Churl, etc. Take him and put him in bolts. But let Matthew Paris, who lived long after many of these oppressions were abolished, tell you the fashions of those times * There is space 〈…〉 Quotation, in the original; but what p●ace in Mat. Paris he refers to, I know not. . Every Lord having this authority over his Tenant, the Superior as comprehending them all and holding in Capite, was tied to the King to see all under his tenure to be of good Government, good behaviour, and forthcoming whensoever they should be demanded to answer any misdemeanour. This appeareth by the Laws of Edward the Confessor, where it is said, Archiepiscopi, Episcopi, Comites, Barones, & omnes qui habuerint Sacam & Socam, etc. milites & proprios servientes sc. dapiferos, pincernas, etc. sub suo friburgo habeant. That is, sub sua fide-jussione de se bene gerendo. By reason whereof, whatsoever those their Lords agreed or disagreed unto in matters of the State and Commonwealth, it did bind every of them their inferiors. Unto whom they themselves might then also appoint Laws and Ordinances in their own Courts. And this is that which Tacitus affirmeth to have been the ancient manner of the Germans our Ancestors; Agricolis suis jus dicere: where under the word Agricolis, he intendeth all them whom we call Tenants. Hence than it comes to pass, that in making Laws of the Kingdom, the common people were not consulted with, but only the Barons and those which held in Capite, who then were called Consilium Regni. And the common people being, as I said, by way of tenure under one or other of them, did then by him that was their chief Lord (as by their Tribune or Procurator, and as now by the Knights of the Shire) consent or descent in Law-making, and are not therefore named in the title of any ancient Law. Look Doomsday-book, and there ye shall see the whole Kingdom divided only among the Barons and great Persons: and the whole Commons of the Kingdom distributed and placed under some of them, tho' not by name, yet by number in their several qualities. Let us then see, how the practice of those ancient ages agreed with this Theorem. King Ina 1 Circ. An. 700. Ll. Inae Praef. made his Laws by the advice of Kenred his father, and (as he saith himself) Heddis & Erkenwaldi Episcoporum meorum, & omnium Aldermannorum (i. e. Procerum) meorum, & seniorum sapientum Regni mei, & multa aggregatione servorum Dei, which is of Churchmen, as I take it. Alured briefly, 2 Circ. 880. in Praef. Consilio sapientum meorum. Edward the Elder proposeth his 3 Circ. 910. Ll. Praef. & ca 1. 7. Laws not as Senatus-consultum but as Edictum Principis; viz. Ego Edovardus Rex, iis omnibus qui Reipub. praesunt, etiam atque etiam mando, ut, etc. And after by the absolute words, Praecipio, Statuimus, Volo. Yet those wherein he and Guthrun the Dane joined, are called 4 Praef. Foed. Senatus-consulta. Ethelstane made his, 5 Circ. 930. in Praef. Ll. & Epilogue. Ex prudenti Vlfhelmae Archiepiscopi aliorumque Episcoporum suorum consilio, necnon omnium Optimatum & sapientum mandato suo congregatorum. Edmund, in a great Assembly, 6 Cir. 940. Ll. Praef. Tam Ecclesiasticorum quam Laicorum, cui interfuerunt Oda & Wulstanus Archiep. plurimique alii Episcopi. Edgar, 7 Circ. 970. in Praef. In frequenti sapientum Senatu. Ethelred, 8 Circ. 1000 in Praef. In sapientum Concilio. Canuius saith, 9 Circ. 1025. in Praef. Ll. politic. Sapientum adhibito Consilio per omnem Angliam observari praecipio. As for Edward the Confessor, his Laws come not to us as they were composed by himself, but as the Paragraphs of them were collected by the Conqueror, and augmented afterward. In which collection, there is no mention made of the manner of their Institution. But reciting of a passage of St. Austin's touching Tithes, it is spoken as of former time, that Haec concessa sunt à Rege, Baronibus & populo; meaning, the several kinds of Tithes there mentioned. But whether these words extend to a concession of them by Parliament (as we now call it,) or by a voluntary contribution of them, yielded unto by the King, the Barons, and the people, according to the Canons of the Church, I leave to others to determine. To come to times of the Conqueror; wherein Novus seclorum nascitur ordo; and from whence, as from a new period, we must now take all our projections. The great establishment of his own and of Edward the Confessor's Laws, is said in the title to be that which Gulielmus Rex Anglorum cum Principibus suis constituit post conquisitionem Angliae. Other Authors instead of Principibus have Barones. And tho' all his Laws for the most part were ordained by his Charter in his own name only, yet they seem to be made by the consent of the Bishops and Barons. For in his Charter whereby he divideth the Court-Christian from the Temporal, he saith thus— Sciatis— quod Episcopales Leges— communi Concilio & consilio Archiepiscoporum meorum & caeterorum Episcoporum & Abbatum, & omnium Principum regni mei emendandas judicavi. And this seemeth to be that same Commune Concilium totius Regni, whereby he made the Laws he speaketh of in his Charter of the great Establishment aforesaid. William Rufus in An. 1094. calls 1 Eadm. Will. II. p. 26. Episcopos, Abbates cunctosque Regni Principes to a Council at Rochingheham, 5. Id. Mar. Henry I de communi Concilio gentis Anglorum (saith Matthew Paris) posuit Dunelmensem Episcopum in vinculis. Where Gentis Anglorum might be extended to such a Parliament as we use at this day, if the use of that time had born it. But Eadmere speaking of a Great Counsel holden a little after at Lambeth, calleth it Concilium Magnatum utriusque Ordinis, excluding plainly the Commons. And to that effect are also all the other Councils of his time. But our later Chroniclers following 2 Lib. 11. pa. 188. Polydore as it seemeth (for they cite no Author) do affirm that Henry I. in the sixteenth year of his reign, held the first Parliament of the three Estates. The truth whereof I have taken some pains to examine; but can find nothing to make it good. 3 Lib. 5. pa. 117. Eadmerus who flourished at that very time, writing particularly of this Council or Assembly, saith, XIII. Kal. Aprilis, factus est conventus Episcoporum, Abbatum, & Principum totius Regni apud Serberiam, cogente eos illuc sanctione Regis Henrici I. And among other causes handled there, he showeth this to be the principal, viz. That the King being to go into Normandy, and not knowing how God might dispose of him, he desired that the succession might be confirmed on his son William. Whereupon (saith Eadmer) omnes Principes facti sunt homines ipsius Willielmi, fide & Sacramento confirmati. Florentius Wigorniensis, who lived at that time and died about two years after, 4 In An. 1116. reporteth it to the same effect. Conventio Optimatum & Baronum totius Angliae apud Sealesbiriam 14. Cal. Apr. facta est▪ qui in praesentia Regis Henrici, homagium filio suo Gulielmo fecerunt & fidelitatem ei juraverunt. Here is no mention of the Commons; whom in likelihood they should not have pretermitted, if they had been there assembled, contrary to the usual custom of those times. Nor doth any succeeding 5 W. Nubrig. Malmesb. Rad. Nig. Sim. Dun. Rad. de Dicet. Mat. Par. Mat. West. Ran. Cestr. Tho. Walsingh. Author that I can find, once touch upon it. I conceive there might a mistaking grow by Polydore or some other; for that many of the Commons, if not all, were at this time generally sworn to Prince William, as well as the Barons were; and as after in the year 1127. to Maud his daughter, Prince William being then dead. But I no where find in all the Councils (or Parliaments if you so will call them) of this time, any mention made of any other than the Bishops, Barons, and great Persons of the Realm. And so likewise in the time of King Stephen. The first alteration that I meet with, is in the twenty second year of Hen. II. where Benedict Abbas saith, Circa festum S. Pauli venit Dominus Rex usque ad Northampton, & magnum ibi celebravit Concilium de Statutis regni sui, coram Episcopis, Comitibus, & Baronibus terrae suae, & per consilium Militum & Hominum suorum. Here Militum & Hominum suorum extendeth beyond the Barons, and agreeth with the Charter of King John, as after shall appear. Yet Hoveden speaking of this Council, doth not mention them; but only termeth it Magnum Concilium. But there happened about this time a notable alteration in the Commonwealth. For the great Lords and owners of Towns which before manured their lands by Tenants at Will, began now generally to grant them Estates in fee, and thereby to make a great multitude of Freeholders' more than had been. Who by reason of their several interests, and being not so absolutely tied unto their Lords as in former time, began now to be a more eminent part in the Commonwealth, and more to be respected therefore in making Laws, to bind them and their Inheritance. But the words Militum & Hominum suorum, imply such as held of the King in Capite not per Baroniam, and therefore were no Barons; yet such as by right of their Tenure ought to have some voice or Patron to speak for them in the Councils of the Kingdom. For holding of the King, as the Barons did, they could not be patronised under them. And doubtless they were not many at this time, tho' much increased since the making of Domesdei▪ book; where those few that were then, are mentioned. And it may be, the word Hominum, here doth signify those that served for Burrough-Towns holden of the King; for it must be understood of Tenants not of Servants. To grope no further in this darkness. The first certain light that I discover for the form of our Parliaments at this day, is, that which riseth forty years after, in the Magna Charta of King John. The words whereof I will recite at large, as they stand not only in Matthew Paris, but also in the Red-Book of the Exchequer, with some little difference happening in the writing. Et Civitas Londinensis habeat omnes antiquas libertates & liberas consuetudines suas tam per terras quam per aquas. Praetereà, volumus & concedimus, quod omnes aliae Civitates & Burgi, & Villae, & Barones de quinque Portubus, & omnes Portus, habeant omnes libertates, & omnes liberas consuetudines suas: Et ad habendum commune Consilium Regni de Auxiliis assidendis (aliter quam in 1 Viz. 〈◊〉 redimendum personam Regis, ad fil●um prim●genitum militem faciendum, & ad filiam primogenitum semel maritand●●. tribus casibus praedictis) & de Scutagiis assidendis; summoneri faciemus Archiepiscopos, Episcopos, Abbates, Comites, & Majores Barones Regni sigillatim per literas nostras. Et praetereà faciemus summoneri in generali per Vicecomites & Ballivos nostros, omnes alias qui in Capite tenent de nobis, ad certum diem, scil. ad terminum 40. dierum ad minus, & ad certum locum; & in omnibus literis summonitionis illius, causam summonitionis illius exponemus. Et sic facta summonitione negotium procedat ad diem assignatum, secundum consilium eorum qui praesentes fuerint, quamvis non omnes summoniti venerint. Here is laid forth the Members, the Matter, and the Manner of summoning of a Common Council of the Kingdom; which as it seemeth was not yet in the Records of State called a Parliament. The Members are of three sorts. First, the Arch-Bishops, Bishops, Abbots, Earls, and the Greater Barons of the Kingdom, so called to distinguish them from the Lesser Barons, which were the Lords of Manors. Secondly, Those (here before mentioned by Bened. Abbas to be called to Clarenden) that held of the King in Capite; whom I take to be now the Knights of the Shire. And thirdly, those of Cities, Burroughs, and Towns, called Burgesses, and the Barons of the Cinque-ports. The first sort are to appear personally, or by particular Proxies; for the words as touching them are, Summoniri faciemus sigillatim: but as touching the others, it is Summoniri faciemus generaliter, etc. not that all should come confusedly, but that they should send their Advocates, which commonly are but two, to speak for them. These the French in their Parliaments call 2 Hottom. Francog. ca 27. Ambasiatores, and Syndicos. In the first rank, the Earls and greater Barons have their place in this Council; for that they hold of the King in Capite by a Barony▪ And the Bishops and Abbots with them of the second rank: so likewise, for that it was declared and ordained in the Council of Clarendon, that they should have their possessions of the King as a Barony, and should be suitors, and sit in the King's Court in judgements, as other Barons; till it came to the diminution of Members, or matter of death. But this Council of Clarendon did rather affirm than give them their privilege. For the Prelates of the Church were in all ages the prime part of these great Councils. In the third rank, the Burgesses and Barons of the Cinque-ports have their place; not so much in respect of Tenure (for they were not conceived to be owners of lands) but for that in Taxes and Tallages touching their goods and matter of Trade, they might have some to speak for them, as well as other Members of the Kingdom. But here then ariseth a question, how it cometh to pass, that every poor Burrow of England, how little soever it be, (two excepted) have two to speak for them in this great Council, when the greatest Counties have no more. It seemeth that those of the Counties whom we call Knights, served not in ancient time for all the Freeholders' of the County, as at this day they do, but were only chosen in the behalf of them that held of the King in Capite, and were not Barones majores Barons of the Realm. For all Freeholders besides them had their Lord Paramount (which held in capite to speak for them) as I have showed before; and these only had no body, for that themselves held immediately of the King. Therefore King John by his Charter did agree to summon them only and no other Freeholders; howbeit those other Freeholders, because they could not always be certainly distinguished from them that held in capite, (which increased daily) grew by little and little to have voices in election of the Knights of the Shire, and at last to be confirmed therein by the Stat. 7. Henr. IU. and 8. Henr. VI But to come to our question, why there are but two Knights for a County? It may well seem to be, for that in those times of old there were very few besides the Barons that held in capite, as appeareth by that we have already spoken; and that two therefore might seem sufficient for these few, as well as two for the greatest Burroughs or City of England, except London. And it may be, that of the four which serve for London, two of them be for it as it is a City, and two other as it is a County; tho' elsewhere it be not so. But when two came first to be chosen or appointed for the rest of the Burrow or County, I cannot find. It seemeth by those Synods that were holden in the times of the Saxon Kings, and by some after the Conquest, that great numbers of the common people flowed thither 1 Co●e Report. in Epist. . For it is said in An. 1021. Cum quamplurimis gregariis militibus, ac cum populi multitudine copiosa: And An. 1126. Innumeraque Cleri & populi multitudine: and so likewise in An. 1138. and other Synods and Councils. By what order or limitation, this innumera populi multitudo came to these Assemblies, it appeareth not. 2 Ad l. 2. Cod. de Legat. l. 10. Bartol that famous Civilian, and 3 Fra●●ogal. ca 27. p. 15. Hottoman according with him, thus expoundeth it in other places. Nota: quod Praesides Provinciarum coadunant universale Parlamentum Provinciae: quod intellige, non quod omnes de Provincia debent ad illud ire, sed de omnibus Civitatibus deputantur Ambasiatores, qui Civitatem repraesentant. And 4 Ad e●nd. L. Johan. de Platea likewise saith: Vbi super aliquo providendum est, pro utilitate totius Provinciae, debet congregari generale Concilium seu Parlamentum: non quod omnes de Provincia vadant, sed de qualibet Civitate aliqui Ambasiatores vel Syndici, qui totam Civitatem repraesentent. In quo Concilio seu Parlamento petitur proponi sanum ac utile consilium. But our Burgesses, as it seemeth, in time of old were not called to consult of State matters; being unproper to their Education, otherwise than in matter of Aid and Subsidy. For King John granteth no more unto them, than ad habendum commune consilium regni de auxiliis assid●ndis; if his Charter be so pointed that this clause belong to that of the Liberties granted to them: which is very doubtful, and seemeth rather to belong to that which followeth; otherwise, there are no words at all for calling them unto the great Councils, or Parliaments (if you so will term them) of that time. And yet further, it is to be noted, that this whole branch of his Charter, touching the manner of his summoning a great Council, was not comprised in the Articles (between him and his Barons) whereupon the Charter was grounded; but gained from him, as it seemeth, afterward. And that may be a reason why it is left out in the Magna Charta of Henry III. confirmed after by Edward I. in such manner as now we have it. The Charter of these Articles, I have seen under his own Seal. After the death of King John, I find many of these great Councils holden, and to be often named by the Authors of that time Colloquia, after the French word Parliament; but no mention in any of them of Burgesses; saving that in An. Dom. 1225. Regis 10. it is said, that the King held his Christmas at Westminster, Praesentibus clero & populo, cum Magnatibus regionis: and that the solemnity being ended, Hugh de Burgo the King's Justice propounded to the Archbishop, Bishops, Earls, Barons, & aliis universis, the losses the King had received in France, requiring of them one XV th'. And in the year 1229. the King summoneth to Westminster Archiepiscopos, Episcopos, Abbates, Priores, Templarios, Hospitalarios, Comites, Barones, Ecclesiarum Rectores, & qui de se tenebant in capite; about the granting a tenth to the Pope: wherein those that held in capite are called (as in Henr. II.) to the Council of Clarendon, and as the Charter of King John purporteth; but no mention is here made of Burgesses. THE ORIGINAL OF THE FOUR TERMS Of the Year. By Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. Printed in the Year 1684. from a very uncorrect and imperfect Copy: Now, Published from the Original Manuscript in the BODLEIAN Library. Sir William Dugdale in his Origines Juridiciales, Chap. 32. pag. 89. concerning this Treatise. I shall here briefly exhibit some particulars, which I acknowledge to have gathered from an ample and most judicious discourse on this Subject, written by the Learned Sir Henry Spelman Knight, in 1614 very well worthy to be made public. THE Occasion of this Discourse. ABout forty two years since, divers Gentlemen in London, studious of Antiquities, framed themselves into a College or Society of Antiquaries, appointing to meet every Friday weekly in the Term at a place agreed of, and for Learning sake to confer upon some questions in that Faculty, and to sup together. The place, after a meeting or two, became certain at Darby-house, where the Herald's-Office is kept, and two Questions were propounded at every meeting, to be handled at the next that followed; so that every man had a sennight's respite to advise upon them, and then to deliver his opinion. That which seemed most material, was by one of the company (chosen for the purpose) to be entered in a book; that so it might remain unto posterity. The Society increased daily: many persons of great worth, as well noble as other learned, joining themselves unto it. Thus it continued divers years; but as all good uses commonly decline; so many of the chief Supporters hereof either dying or withdrawing themselves from London into the Country; this among the rest grew for twenty years to be discontinued. But it than came again into the mind of divers principal Gentlemen to revive it; and for that purpose, upon the— day of— in the year 1614 there met at the same place Sir James Ley Knight, than Attorney of the Court of Wards, since Earl of Marleborough and Lord Treasurer of England; Sir Robert Cotton Knight and Baronett; Sir John Davies his majesty's Attorney for Ireland; Sir Richard St. George Knt. then Norrey, Mr. Hackwell the Queen's Solicitor, Mr. Camden then Clarentieux, myself, and some others. Of these, the Lord Treasurer, Sir Robert Cotton, Mr. Camden, and myself, had been of the original Foundation; and to my knowledge were all then living of that sort, saving Sir John Doderidge Knight, Justice of the King's Bench. We held it sufficient for that time to revive the meeting, and only conceived some rules of Government and limitation to be observed amongst us; whereof this was one, That for avoid offence, we should neither meddle with matters of State nor of Religion. And agreeing of two Questions for the next meeting, we chose Mr. Hackwell to be our Register and the Convocator of our Assemblies for the present; and supping together, so departed. One of the Questions was, touching the Original of the Terms; about which, as being obscure and generally mistaken, I bestowed some extraordinary pains; that coming short of others in understanding, I might equal them if I could in diligence. But before our next meeting, we had notice that his Majesty took a little mislike of our Society; not being informed, that we had resolved to decline all matters of State. Yet hereupon we forbore to meet again, and so all our labours lost. But mine lying by me, and having been often desired of me by some of my Friends, I thought good upon a review and augmentation to let it creep abroad in the form you see it, wishing it might be rectified by some better judgement. SECT. I. Of the Terms in general. AS our Law books have nothing, to my knowledge, touching the original of the Terms, so were it much better if our Chronicles had as little: For tho' it be little they have in that kind, yet is that little very untrue, affirming that William the Conqueror did first institute them. It is not worth the examining who was Author of the error, but it seemeth 1 Deinde constituit (Gulielmus Conquestor) ut quatuor quotanis, etc. Lib. 1. p. 154. l. 16. etc. Polydore Virgil (an Alien in our Commonwealth, and not well endenized in our Antiquities) spread it first in Print. I purpose not to take it upon any man's word: but, searching for the fountain, will, if I can, deduce them from thence, beginning with their definition. The Terms be certain portions of the year, in which only the King's Justices hold plea in the high Temporal Courts of causes belonging to their Jurisdiction, in the places thereto assigned, according to the ancient Rites and Customs of the Kingdom. The definition divides itself, and offers these parts to be considered. 1. The Names they bear. 2. The Original they come from. 3. The Time they continue. 4. The Persons they are held by. 5. The Causes they deal with. 6. The Place they are kept in. 7. The Rites they are performed with. The parts minister matter for a Book at large, but my purpose upon the occasion imposed, being to deal only with the Institution of the Terms; I will travel no farther than the three first stages of my division, (that is) touching their Name, their Original, and their Time of continuance. SECT. II. Of the Names of the Terms. THe word Terminus is of the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, which signifieth the Bound, End, or Limit of a thing; here particularly of the time for Law matters. In the Civil Law it also signifieth a day set to the Defendant, and in that sense doth 2 Lib. 10. cap. 1. & 21. Lib. 3. Tract. 2. cap. 28. nu. 1. Bracton, Glanvil, and others sometimes use it. Mat. Paris calleth the Sheriff's Turn, Terminum Vicecomitis, and in the addition to the MSS. Laws of King Inas, Terminus is applied to the Hundred-Court; as also in a Charter of Hen. I. prescribing the time of holding the Court. And we ordinarily use it for any set portion of Time, as of Life, Years, Lease, etc. The space between the Terms, is named Vacation, à Vacando, as being leisure from Law business; by Latinists Justitium, à jure stando, because the Law is now at a stop or stand. The Civilians and Canonists call Termtime, Dies Juridicos Law-days; the Vacation, Dies Feriales, days of leisure or intermission, Festival-days, as being indeed sequestered from troublesome affairs of humane business, and devoted properly to the service of God, and his Church. According to this, our Saxon and Norman Ancestors divided the year also between God and the King, calling those days and parts that were assigned to God, Dies pacis Ecclesiae, the residue allotted to the King, Dies or tempus pacis Regis. Divisum Imperium cum Jove Caesar habet. Other names I find none anciently among us, nor the word Terminus to be frequent till the age of Henry II. wherein Gervasius Tilburiensis, and Ranulphus de Glanvilla (if those books be theirs) do continually use it for Dies pacis Regis. The ancient Romans, in like manner, divided their year between their Gods and their Commonwealth; naming their Law-days or Termtime, Fastos, because their Praetor or Judge might then Fari, that is speak freely; their Vacation, or days of Intermission (as appointed to the service of their Gods) they called Nefastos, for that the Praetor might ne fari, not speak in them judicially. Ovid (Fastorum lib. 1.) thus expresseth it: Ille Nefastus erat, per quem tria verba silentur: Fastus erat per quem lege licebat agi. When that the three Judicial words The Praetor might not use, It was Nefastus: Fastus then, When each man freely sues. The three Judicial words were Do, Dico, Abdico; by the first he gave licence to city partem ream, the Defendant; by the second he pronounced Sentence; and by the third he granted Execution. This à latere. The word Term hath also other considerations; sometimes it is used for the whole space, from the first Return to the end of the Term, including the day of Return, Essoigne, Exception, etc. Sometimes and most commonly excluding these from the first sitting of the Judges in full Court, (which is the first day for Appearance) and this is called full Term by the Statute of 32. of Hen. VIII. cap. 21. as tho' the part precedent were but Semi-Term, Puisne-Term, or Introitus Termini. The words of the Statute are these, That Trinity-Term shall begin the Monday next after Trinity-Sunday, for keeping the Essoignes, Proffers, Returns, and other ceremonies heretofore used, etc. And that the full Term of the said Trinity-Term shall yearly for over begin the Friday next after Corpus Christi day. Here the particulars I speak of are apparently set forth, and the Term declared to begin at the first Return. By which reason it falleth out that the eight days wherein the Court of the Exchequer openeth, at the beginning of Michaelmass-Term, Hilary-Term and Easter, are to be accounted as parts of those Terms, for that they fall within the first Return: the Exchequer having one Return in every of them, more than the Courts of Common-Law have, viz. Crastino Sancti Michaelis, Octabis Hilarii, and Octabis or Clausum Paschae: And it seemeth that Trinity-Term had Crastino Trinitatis in the self same manner, before this Statute altered it. SECT. III. Of the Original of Terms or Law-days. LAw-days or Dies Juridici, which we call Terms, are upon the matter, as ancient as offences and controversies: God himself held a kind of Term in Paradise, when judicially he tried and condemned Adam, Eve, and the Serpent. In all Nations, as soon as Government was settled, some time was appointed for punishing offences, redressing of wrongs, and determining of controversies; and this time to every of those Nations was their Term. The Original therefore of the Terms or Law-days, and the time appointed to them, are like the Signs of Oblique Ascension in Astronomy, that rise together. I shall not need to speak any more particularly of this point, but show it, as it farther offereth itself in our passage, when we treat of the time appointed to Term or Law-days, which is the next and longest part of this our Discourse. SECT. IV. Of the Times assigned to Law-matters, called the Terms. WE are now come to the great Arm of our Division, which spreads itself into many branches, in handling whereof we shall fall, either necessarily or accidentally, upon these points, viz. 1. Of Law-days among the Ancients, Jews, Greeks, etc. 2. Of those among the Romans using choice days. 3. Of those among the Primitive Christians using all alike. 4. How Sunday came to be exempted. 5. How other Festivals, and other Vacation days. 6. That our Terms took their Original from the Canon-Law. 7. The Constitutions of our Saxon Kings; Edward the Elder, Guthrun the Dane, and the Synod of Eanham under Ethelred, touching this matter. 8. The Constitutions of Canutus more particular. 9 The Constitutions of Edward the Confessor more material. 10. The Constitution of William the Conqueror: and of Law-days in Normandy. 11. What done by William Rufus, Henry I. Stephen, and Henry II. 12. Of Hiliary-Term according to those ancient Laws. 13. Of Easter-Term in like manner. 14. Of Trinity-Term and the long Vacation following; how it differeth from the other Vacations. 15. Of Michaelmass-Term. 16. Of the later Constitutions of the Terms by the Statutes of the 51. of Hen. III. and 36. of Edw. III. 17. How Trinity-Term was altered by the 32. of Hen. VIII. CHAP. I. Of Law-days among the Ancients. THe time allotted to Lawbusiness seemeth to have been that from the beginning amongst all, or most Nations, which was not particularly dedicated (as we said before) to the service of God or some rites of Religion 〈…〉. (for none that I read of, ordained them to be used confusedly.) Therefore whilst Moses was yet under the Law of Nature, and before the positive Law was given, he sacrificed and kept the holy Festival with Jethro his father-in-law on the one day, but judged not the people till the day after. Some particular instance (I know) may be given to the contrary, as I after shall mention, but this seemeth then the general use. 〈…〉. The Greeks, who (as Josephus in his book against Appion witnesseth) had much of their ancient Rites from the Hebrews, held two of their 1 〈…〉 had about six more or l●ss of them, so called because on them the Prytanean Magistrates might hold Court. Prytanean-days in every Month for civil matters, and the third only for their Sacra. Aeschines▪ in his Oration against C●esiphon, chargeth Demosthenes with writing a Decree in the Senate, that the 2 So called 〈…〉 where their business was to sit only on things inanimate, as when a piece of stone, timber or iron, etc. ●ell ●n a man, ●f the 〈◊〉 that ●●●ng it were not known, sentence was passed on that thing which s●ew him; and the Masters of this Court 〈…〉 see that thing cast out of the Territories of Athens. See the Attic Antiq. l. 3. Ch. 3 sect;. 4. Prytanean Magistrates might hold an Assembly upon the eighth day of the approaching Month of 3 The month February, 〈◊〉 as others would have it March, when Sacrifices were most usually offered to the Goddess Diana, 〈…〉 cognomen Diana, quod est, jaculis cervos figens. Elaphebolion, when the holy Rites of Aesculapius were to be solemnised. 〈…〉. The Romans likewise (whether by instinct of nature or precedent) meddled not with Law Causes during the times appointed to the worship of their Gods, as appeareth by their Primitive Law of the twelve Tables, Feriis jurgia amovento, and by the places before cited, as also this of the same Author, Post semel exta Deo data sunt, licet omnia fari, Verbaque honoratus libera Praetor habet. When Sacrifices and holy Rites were done, The Reverend Praetor than his Courts begun. And Martial to the same purpose, Sacra damus ●estis ●ora judicialia ponunt. To be short, it was so common a thing in those days of old, to exempt the times of exercise of Religion from all worldly business; that the Barbarous Nations, even our Angli, whilst they were yet in Germany, the Suevians themselves, and others of those Northern parts would in no wise violate or interrupt it. Tacitus says of them, that during this time of holy Rites, Non bellum ineunt, non arma sumunt, clausum omne ferrum; pax & quies tun● tantum nota, tun● tantum amata. Of our Germane Ancestors we shall speak more anon; our old British are little to the purpose: they judged all Controversies by their Priests the Druids, and to that end met but once a year, as 4 De bello Gallico lib. 6. Caesar showeth us by those of the Gauls. 5 Hist. C●●b p 54. The later Britain's (whom we now call the Wesh) in the Saxons time about the year 900. had two Terms only for causes of Inheritance; the one beginning at the ninth of November till the ninth of February; the other from the ninth of May till the ninth of August. The rest of the year was counted time of Vacation, for sowing in the Spring and Reaping in the Harvest. CHAP. II. Of Law-days amongst the Romans using choice days. I Will therefore seek the Original of our Terms only from the Romans, as all other Nations that have been subject to their Civil and Ecclesiastical Monarchy do, and must. The ancient Romans, whilst they were yet Heathens, did not, as we at this day, use certain continued portions of the year for a legal decision of Controversies, but out of a superstitious conceit that some days were ominous, and more unlucky than others (according to that of the Egyptians,) they made one day to be Fastus or Term-day, and another (as an Egyptian day) to be Vacation or Nefastus: Seldom two Fasti, or Law-days together, yea, they sometimes divided one and the same day in this manner, Qui modo Fastus erat, mane Nefastus erat, The afternoon was Term, the morning Holiday. Nor were all their Fasti applied to Judicature, but some of them to other meetings and consultations of the Commonwealth; so that being divided into three sorts, which they called Fastos proprie, Fastos Endotercisos, & Fastos Comitiales, containing together 184. days, through all the Months of the year, there remained not properly to the Praetor, as Judicial or Triverbial Days, above 28. Whereas, we have in our Terms above 96. days in Court, besides the Sundays and exempted Festivals falling in the Terms; which are twenty or there about. Yet Sir * De Rep. Angl. Lib. 3. Thomas Smith counts it marvellous, that three Tribunals in one City in less than the third part of the year, should rectify the wrongs of so large and populous a Nation as this of England. But let us return where we left off. CHAP. III. Of Law-days among the first Christians, using all times alike. TO beat down the Roman superstition touching observation of days, against which St. Augustine and others wrote vehemently; the Christians at first used all days alike for hearing of Causes, not sparing (as it seemeth) the Sunday itself, thereby falling into another extremity. Yet had they some precedent for it from Moses and the Jews. For Philo Judaeus Lib. 3. in the life of Moses reporteth, that the cause of him that gathered sticks on the Sabbath-day, was by a solemn Council of the Princes, Priests, and the whole Multitude, examined and consulted of on the Sabbath-day. And the Talmudists, who were best acquainted with the Jewish Customs, as also Galatinus the Hebrew do report, that their Judges in the Council called Sanhedrim, sat on the weekday from morning to night, in the Gates of the City; and on the Sabbath-day and solemn Festivals, in the walls. So the whole year than seemed a continual Term, no day exempt. And they that seek the Original of our modern Laws among them, do but spend their time in vain; unless for some things imposed on them by the Roman Emperors, when they became Subjects. How this stood with the Levitical Law, or rather the Moral, I leave to others. CHAP. IU. How Sunday came to be exempted. BUt for reformation of the abuse among Christians, in perverting the Lord's day to the hearing of clamorous Litigants, it was ordained in the year of our Redemption 517. by the Fathers assembled in Concilio Taraconensi, cap. 4. after that, in Concilio Spalensi, cap. 2. and by Adrian Bishop of Rome in the Decretal Caus. 15. quaest. 4. That, 1 Capit. Car. & Lud. Can. 245. Nullus Episcopus vel infra positus Die Dominico causas judicare [al. ventilare] praesumat. No Bishop or inferior person presume to judge or try causes on the Lord's day. For it appeareth by Epiphanius, that in his time (as also many hundred years after) Bishops and Clergymen did hear and determine causes, lest Christians, against the rule of the Apostle, should go to Law under Heathens and Infidels. And it is said in the 1st. Epistle of Clement (if it were truly his) that S. Peter himself did so appoint it. Concil. Tom. 1. p. 33. This Canon of the Church for exempting Sunday, was by Theodosius fortified with an Imperial Constitution, whilst we Britain's were yet under the Roman Government, 2 L. Solis 13. Cod. Theod. de Exact. Solis die, quem dominicum recte dixere majores, omnium omnino litium & negotiorum quiescat intentio. Thus was Sunday redeemed from being a part of the Term; but all other days by express words of the Canon were left to be Dies Juridici, whether they were mean or great Festivals. For it thus followeth in the same place of the 3 Caus. 15 quaest. 4. C. 1. Decretals; Caeteris vero diebus, convenientibus personis, illa quae justa sunt, habent licentiam judicandi, excepto criminali, (or as another Edition reads it) exceptis criminalibus negotiis. The whole Canon is verbatim also decreed in the Capitulars of the Emperor's 4 Lib. 6. Cap. 245 ● Benedict. Levita. Carolus & Ludovicus. CHAP. V. How other Festival and Vacation days were exempted. NOw let us see how other Festivals and parts of the year were taken from the Courts of Justice. The first Canon of note that I meet with to this purpose, is that in Concilio Triburiensi ca 26. in or about the year 895. Nullus Comes, nullusque omnino secularis diebus Dominicis vel Sanctorum in Festis seu Quadragesimae, aut jejuniorum, placitum habere, sed nec populum illo praesumat cohercere. After this, the Council of 5 Bin. Tom. 3. Part 1. p. 616. Meldis Cap. 77. took Easter-week, commonly called the Octaves, from Law business; Pascae hebdomade feriandum, forensia negotia prohibentur. By this example came the Octaves of Pentecost, St. Michael, the Epiphany, etc. to be exempted, and principal Feasts to be honoured with Octaves. The next memorable Council to that of Tribury was the Council of Erpford in Germany in the year 932. which tho' it were then but Provincial, yet being after taken by Gratian into the body of the Canon Law, it became General, and was imposed upon the whole Church. I will recite it at large, as it standeth in 1 Concil. Tom. 3. p. 1056. Binius, for I take it to be one of the foundation-stones to our Terms. Placita secularia Dominicis vel aliis Festis diebus, seu etiam in quibus legitima Jejunia celebrantur secundum Canonicam institutionem, minime fieri volumus. Insuper quoque Gloriosissimus Rex [Francorum Henricus] add augmentum Christianae Religionis, (or as 2 Can. 15. quaest. 4. Gratian hath it) [Sancta Synodus] decrevit ut nulla judiciaria potestas licentiam habeat Christianos sua authoritate ad placitum bannire septem diebus ante Natalem Domini, & à 3 al. Septuagesima. Quinquagesima usque ad Octavas Paschae, & septem diebus ante Nativitatem Sancti Johannis Baptistae, quatenus adeundi Ecclesiam orationibusque vacandi liberius habeatur facultas. But the Council of St. Medard extant first in 4 Lib. 12. c. 20. Burchard, and then in 5 Can. 22. q. 5. Ca 17. Gratian enlargeth these Vacations in this Manner, Decrevit Sancta Synodus, ut a Quadragesima usque ad Octavam Paschae, & ab Adventu Domini usque ad Octavam Epiphaniae, necnon in Jejuniis quatuor temporum, & in Litaniis Majoribus, & in diebus Dominicis, & in diebus Rogationum (nisi de concordia & pacificatione) nullus supra sacra Evangelia jurare praesumat. The word [jurare] here implieth that they should not try Law-causes, or hold plea on these days, as by the same phrase in other Laws shall by and by appear: which the Gloss also upon this Canon maketh manifest, saying, In his etiam diebus causae exerceri non debent, citing the other 6 Can. 15. q. 4. Ca 1. Canon here next before recited; but adding withal, that the Court and custom of Rome itself doth not keep Vacation from Septuagesima, nor, as it seemeth, in some other of the days. And this precedent we follow, when Septuagesima and Sexagesima fall in the compass of Hilary-Term. CHAP. VI That our Terms took their Original from the Canon-Law. THus we leave the Canon Law, and come home to our own Country, which out of these, and such other foreign Constitutions (for many more there are) have framed our Terms, not by choosing any set portion of the year for them (as Polydore Virgil, and our Chroniclers ignorantly suggest) but by taking up such times for that purpose, as the Church and common Necessity (for collecting the fruits of the Earth) left undisposed of, as in that which followeth plainly shall appear. CHAP. VII. The Constitution of our Saxon Kings in this matter. Inas' one of our ancient Saxon Kings, made a very strict Law against working on Sunday 7 Fif þeoƿ mon ƿyrce on sunnan daeg. be his hlafordes haese. sy he freo. Legum Cap. 4 Legum Cap. 4 If a Servant work on Sunday by his Master's command, let him be made free, etc. . Of Edw. the Elder and Guthrun. And 8 Legum Cap. 39 Alured instituted many Festivals; but the first that prohibited Juridical proceedings upon such days, was Edward the Elder and Guthrun the Dane, who in the League between them, made about ten years before the Council of Erpford, (that it may appear we took not all our light from thence) did thus ordain; Ordel & aþas syndon tocƿedon freols dagum. & rihtfaesten dagum; etc. We forbid that Ordel and Oaths (So they called Law-tryals at that time) be used upon Festival and lawful Fasting days, etc. How far this Law extended, appeareth not particularly; no doubt to all Festival and Fasting-days then imposed by the Roman Church, and such other Provincial, as by our Kings and Clergy were here instituted. Those which by Alured were appointed to be Festivals, are now by this Law made also days of Vacation from Judicial Trials; yet seem they, for the most part, to be but Semi-Festivals, as appointed only to freemen not to bondmen; for so his 1 Leg. Alur. cap. 39 Law declareth, viz. The twelve days of Christmas, the day wherein Christ overcame the Devil, the Anniversary of St. Gregory, the seven days afore Easter, and the seven days after, the day of St. Peter and St. Paul, and the whole week before St. Mary in Harvest, and the Feast-day of All-Saints. But the four Wednesdays in the four Ember weeks are remitted to Bondmen to bestow their work in them as they thought good. The Synod of Eanham. To come to that which is more perspicuous; I find about 2 'Twas held between the years 1006. and 1013. See the Author's Con. Britan. Tom. 1. pag. 510. sixty years after, a Canon in our 3 The word Synod here signifies more than Council, not as 'tis usaally restrained to that of the Clergy 〈◊〉. Synod of Eanham, under King Ethelred in these words. First, touching Sunday, 4 Concil. Eanham. Can. 15. Dominicae solempnia diei cum summo honore magnopere celebranda sunt, nec quicquam in eadem operis agatur servilis. Negotia quoque secularia quaestionesque publicae in eadem deponantur die. Then commanding the Feast-days of the B. Virgin, and of all the Apostles, the 5 Can. 16. Fast of the Ember days, and of the 6 Can. 17. Friday in every week to be duly kept; it proceedeth thus, 7 Can. 18. Judicium quippe quod Anglicè Ordeal dicitur, & juramenta vulgaria, festivis temporibus & legitimis jejuniis; sed & ab Adventu Domini usque post Octabas Epiphaniae, & à Septuagesima usque 15. dies post Pascha minime exerceantur: sed sit his temporibus summa pax & concordia inter Christianos, sicut fieri oportet. It is like there were some former Constitutions of our Church to this purpose; but either mine eye hath not light upon them, or my memory hath deceived me of them. CHAP. VIII. The Constitution of Canutus, more particular. CAnutus succeeding shortly by his Danish sword in our English Kingdom, not only retained but revived this former Constitution, adding, after the manner of his zeal, two new Festival and Vacation days. 〈◊〉 leg. Cap. 17. And ƿe forheodað ordal & aðas freols dagum. & ymbren dagum. & rite faesten dagum; & fram Adventum domini oþ se eahtoþa dag again sy ofer tƿelfta daeg▪ etc. We forbid Ordal and Oaths on Feast-days and Ember-days, and in Lent, and set fasting days, and from the Advent of our Lord till the eighth day after the twelfth be past. And from Septuagesima till fifteen nights after Easter. And the Sages have ordained that St. Edward's day shall be Festival over all England on the fifteenth of the Kalends of April, and St. Dunstan's on the fourteenth of the Kalends of June, and that all Christians (as right it is) should keep them hallowed and in peace. Canutus, following the Synod of Eanham, setteth down in the Paragraph next before this recited, which shall be Festival and which Fasting-days, appointing both to be days of Vacation. Among the Fasting-days he nameth the Saints Eves and the Fridays; but excepteth the Fridays when they happen to be Festival-days, and those which come between Easter and Pentecost; as also those between Midwinter (so they called the Nativity of our Lord) and Octabis Epiphaniae. So that, at this time, some Fridays were Law-days and some were not. Those in Easter Term, with the Eve of Philip and Jacob, were; and the rest were not. The reason of this partiality (as I take it) was; they fasted not at Christmas for joy of Christ's Nativity, nor between Easter and Whitsuntide, for that Christ continued upon the Earth, from his Resurrection till his Ascension; And * Matth. 9 15. Mar. 2. 19 the children of the wedding may not fast so long as the Bridegroom is with them: Nor till Whitsuntide, for joy of the coming of the Holy Ghost. CHAP. IX. The Constitution of Edward the Confessor most material. SAint Edward the Confessor drew this Constitution of Canutus nearer to the course of our time, as a Law, in these words: 1 Leges Edw. Conf. cap. 9 Ab Adventu Domini usque ad Octabas Epiphaniae pax Dei & sanctae Ecclesiae per omne Regnum; similiter à Septuagesima usque ad Octabas Paschae; item ab Ascensione Domini usque ad Octabas Pentecostes; item omnibus diebus quatuor temporum; item omnibus Sabbatis ab hora nona, & tota die sequenti, usque ad diem Lunae; item Vigiliis Sanctae Mariae, Sancti Michaelis, Sancti Johannis Baptistae, Apostolorum omnium & Sanctorum quorum solennitates a Sacerdotibus Dominicis ●nnunciantur diebus; & omnium Sanctorum in Kalendis Novembris, semper ab hora nona Vigiliarum, & subsequenti solennitate: Item in Parochiis in quibus dedicationis dies observatur; item Parochiis Ecclesiarum ubi propria Festivitas Sancti celebratur, etc. The Rubric of this Law is, De temporibus & diebus pacis Regis, intimating Termtime; and here in the Text the Vacations are called Dies pacis Dei & sanctae Ecclesiae, as I 2 Sect. 2. said in he beginning. But pax Dei, pax Ecclesiae, & pax Regis, in other Laws of Edward the Confessor, and elsewhere, have other significations also more particular. Hora nona is here (as in all Authors of that time) intended for three of the clock in the afternoon, being the ninth hour of the artificial day; wherein the Saxons, as other parts of Europe, and our Ancestors of much later time, followed the Judaical computation: perhaps till the invention and use of Clocks gave a just occasion to alter it, for that they could not daily vary for the unequal hours. CHAP. X. The Constitution of William the Conqueror. THis Constitution of Edward the Confessor was amongst his other Laws confirmed by William the Coquerour; as not only 1 In Hen. II. pag. 600. Hoveden and those ancient Authors testify, but by the Decree of the Conqueror himself, in these words; 2 Lamb. exord. Ll. Gul●el. Cod. MS. Hoc quoque praecipio ut omnes habeant & teneant Leges Edwardi in omnibus rebus, adauctis his quae constituimus ad utilitatem Anglorum. And in those Auctions nothing is added, altered, or spoken, concerning any part of that Constitution. Neither is it like, that the Conqueror did much innovate the course of our Terms or Law-days, seeing he held them in his own Duchy of Normandy, not far differing from the same manner, having received the Customs of that his Country from this of ours, by the hand of Edward the Confessor; as in the beginning of their old 3 In descrip. Norman. Custumary themselves do acknowledge. The words touching their Law-days or Trials be these, under the Title De temporibus quibus leges non debent fieri: 4 Custum. Cap. 80. Notandum autem est quod quaedam sunt tempora in quibus leges non debent fieri, nec simplices, nec apertae, viz. omnia tempora in quibus matrimonia non possunt celebrari. Ecclesia autem legibus apparentibus omnes dies Festivos prohibet, & defendit, viz. ab hora nona die Jovis, usque ad ortum Solis die Lunae sequenti, & omnes dies solennes novem lectionum & solennium jejuniorum, & dedicationis Ecclesiae in qua duellum est deducendum. This Law doth generally inhibit all Judicial proceedings, during the times wherein Marriage is forbidden, and particularly all trials by Battle, (which the French and our 5 Lib. 4. c. 1. Lib. 14 c. 1. 2. Glanvil call Leges apparentes, alias apparibiles, vulgarly Loix Apparisans) during the other times therein mentioned. And it is to be noted, that the Emperor Frederick the Second in his 6 Lib. 2. c. 31. Neapolitan Constitutions includeth the trials by Ordeal under Leges paribiles. But touching the time wherein Marriage is forbidden; it agreed at that day with Ll. Edw. Conf. c. 9 the Vacations from Lawbusiness, prescribed by Edward the Confessor: the Church not thinking it reason, that men abstaining from litigation, should give themselves to lust, 7 Gloss. Can. 33. q. 4. ca Non oportet in Quadrages. and to feasting and dancing, (things incident to Marriage:) In which respect, it also required that man and wife (as near as they could) should at these times forbear the pleasure of their bed, and give themselves to devotion and piety. For tho' covetous persons have since abused that godly Institution to their profit, yet the Fathers that were Authors of it in Ilerdensi Concilio, about 500 years after Christ, aimed at nothing, but merely sanctity. The times of Marriage, prohibited according to the Constitution of the Church, were these; 8 Lindo. C●an. 〈◊〉 ca Omnia. v. So●empn. Decr. Grat. de Feriis, ca Capellanus. Decr. Grat. Can. 33. q. 4. ca Non oportet ● Septuag. B●l●th. de Divin. O●●i●. ca 65. A prima Dominica Adventus, usque ad Octavas Epiphaniae exclusive: & à Dominica Septuagesimae usque ad primam Dominicam post Pascha inclusive: & à prima die Rogationum usque ad septimum diem festi Pentecostes inclusive. The Law-Vacation, according to the prescription of Edward the Confessor, is, ab Ascensione Domini usque ad octabis Pentecostes. But here, the Wedding-vacation is three days before it, viz. à prima die Rogationum; which is according to the Constitution De Feriis, ca Capellanus. So that the Term-times, and Vacations, of the English and Normans, were anciently all one; and our Ecclesiastical Courts hold it so to this day. Of the Dies novem Lectionum before mentioned, we shall speak anon. CHAP. XI. What done by William Rufus, Henry I. King Stephen, and Henry II. AS for William Rufus, we read that he pulled many lands from the Church, but not that he abridged the Vacation times assigned to it. Henry I. upon view of former Constitutions, composed this Law under the Title, De observatione temporis 1 Leg. Hen. I. c. 62. Leges faciendi, viz. ab Adventu Domini usque ad Octabis Epiphaniae, & à Septuagesima usque ad 15. dies post Pascham, & Festis diebus, & quatuor Temporum, & diebus Quadragesimalibus, & aliis legitimis Jejuniis, in diebus Veneris, & vigiliis Sanctorum Apostolorum non est tempus leges faciendi, idem vel jusjurandum (nisi primo fidelitate domini vel concordia) vel bellum, vel ferri, vel aquae, vel leges exactionis tractari, sed sit in omnibus vera pax, beata charitas, ad honorem omnipotentis Dei, etc. The Copies of these Laws is much corrupted, and it appeareth by Florence Wigorn's Continuer, that the Londoners refused them, and put Maud the Empress to an ignominious An. Dom. 1142. flight when she pressed the observation of them. But in this particular branch there is nothing not agreeable to some former Constitution. The word Bellum here signifieth Combats, which among our Saxons are not spoken of, and by those of Ferri vel aquae, are meant Ordeal. King Stephen by his Charter recited at Malmesbury, confirmed and established by a Generality, 2 Hist. Nou. lib. 1. pag. 179. Bonas leges, & antiquas, & justas consuetudines. Henry the II. expressly ratified the Laws of Edward the Confessor and William the Conqueror, as 3 In Hen. II. pag. 600. Hoveden telleth us, saying, That he did it by the advice of Ranulph Glanvil then newly made Chief Justice of England; which seemeth to be true, for that 4 Lib. 2. Cap. 11. Glanvil doth accordingly make some of his Writs returnable in Octabis, or Clauso Paschae, where the Laws of Edward the Confessor appoint the end of Lent Vacation: And 5 Dial. Scacc. Gervasius Tilburiensis also mentioneth the same return. Yet the MSS. Laws of 6 Ca 62. Henry II. which remain in the Red-book of the Exchequer, following the Synod of Eanham, extendeth Lent Vacation, à Septuagesima usque 15. dies post Pascha, and layeth out the whole frame of the year in this manner, under the Rubric De observatione temporis leges faciendi, viz. Ab Adventu Domini usque ad Octabis Epiphaniae, & a Septuagesima usque ad quindecim dies post Pascha, & festis diebus, & quatuor temporum, & diebus Quadragesimalibus, & aliis legitimis jejuniis in diebus Veneris & Vigiliis singulorum Apostolorum non est tempus leges faciendi, idem vel jusjurandum nisi primo fidelitate Domini, vel concordia, vel bellum, vel ferri, vel aquae, vel legis examinationis tractari. Sed sit in omnibus vera pax (&) beata charitas ad honorem Omnipotentis, cujus sapientia conditi sumus, nativitate provecti, morte redempti, consolation securi; & qui debitor est, persolvat ante vel induciet, donec dies isti transeant, gaudiis & honestis voluptatibus instituti. Et si quis maleficium inter manus habens, alicubi retinetur; ibi purgetur vel sordidetur si solum inculpatio, plegiis si opus est datis, ubi justum fuerit terminanda revertatur. CHAP. XII. The Terms laid out according to these ancient Laws. TO lay out now the bounds of the Terms according to these Canons and Constitutions, especially that ancient Law of Edward the Confessor; it thus appeareth, viz. 〈…〉 Hilary-Term began then certainly at Octabis Epiphaniae, that is the thirteenth day of January, seven days before the first Return it now hath, and nine days before our Term beginneth; and ended at the Saturday next before Septuagesima, which being movable made this Term longer in some years than in others. Florentius Wigorniensis, and Walsingham in his 1 Hypodig. Neust. An. 1096. Malm. p 124 Hypodigma Neustriae saith,— Anno 1096. In Octabis Epiphaniae apud Sarisburiam Rex Gulielmus [Rufus] tenuit Consilium in quo jussit Gulielmi de Anco in duello victi oculos eruere, & testiculos abscindere, & Dapiferum illius Gulielmum de Alderi, filium amitae illius suspendi, etc. proceeding also judicially against others. Tho' Walsingham calleth this Consilium with an s, a Counsel; and Wigorniensis Concilium with a c, an Assembly, (the word Term perhaps not being in use under William Rufus;) yet it seemeth to be no other, than an Assembly of the Barons, in the King's house or Court of State, (which was then the ordinary place of Justice for crimes of this nature.) For the Barons of the Land were at that time Judges of all causes, which we call Pleas of the Crown, and of all other belonging to the Court of the King: The proceeding also against these offenders seemeth merely Legal, and not Parliamentary or ex arbitrio. For the trial was according to Law, by Battle; and the judgement (after the manner of the time) by putting out the eyes and mutilation of the privy members. As for putting men to death, I confess that it was not at this time ordinary: For 2 Ll. Gul. R. S●n. c. 19 William the Conqueror had made a Law: Interdico nequis occidatur, vel suspendatur pro aliqua culpa; sed eruantur oculi & abscindantur testiculi. But as himself observed it not; so his Son made not nice in breaking of it. And I think the Barons of that time did in many things, (especially crimes of Treason) ex arbitrio judicare. Besides this, if it had been other than an ordinary course of justice, they would not have called it Consilium or Concilium simply; but magnum Concilium or commune Concilium Regni, as the phrase than was for Parliaments. Lastly, tho' it had been a Parliament, yet they could not, or at least they would not break the Constitutions of the Church, by meddling with trials of crime and blood, in diebus pacis Ecclesiae: and therefore we must conceive it to be done in Termtime, & diebus pacis Regis, as the Canons alleged, and assigned it. I meet also with a precedent to this purpose in 3 De Gest. Freder. I. lib. 2. c. 72. Radevicus under the year 1160. whereby it appears, that they began their Term or Law-day likewise beyond the Seas at Octabis Epiphaniae. Curia (says he) quae in Octavis Epiphaniae Papiae fuerat indicta, usque in sextam feriam proxime ante caput jejunii (quia in destructione Cremae dominus Imperator detinebatur) est dilata. Cust ●●t. cap. 〈◊〉. The Norman Custumary showeth also expressly, that this Term began at Octabis Epiphaniae: in saying, that their Law-days began and went out with the times of celebrating Marriage: which in this part of the year (as we showed before) came in at Octab. Epiphaniae, and went out at Septuagesima, as it still doth. And the Court of the Arches doth still hold the same beginning. The Exchequer also being brought out of Normandy, seemeth to retain at this day the steps of the Norman custom. For in that it openeth eight days before the beginning of the Term, it openeth upon the matter at Octabis Epiphaniae: By which it appeareth that it was then no Vacation, and that the Term was begun at Octabis Epiphaniae; whereby it is the likelier also that it ended at Septuagesima, lest beginning it, as we now do, it might fall out some years to have no Hilary-Term at all, as shall anon appear. And this our ancient use of ending the Term at Septuagesima is some inducement to think, the Council of Erpford is depraved, and that the word there Quinquagesima should be Septuagesima, as the gloss there reporteth it to be in some other place: And as well Gratian mistakes this, as he hath done the Council Concil. Tom. 3. itself, attributing it to Ephesus a City of jonia, instead of Erpford a Town in Germany; where Burchard before him, and Binius since, do now place it. Mr. Ai●. Agard. It comes here to my mind, what I have heard an old Chequerman many years ago report, that this Term and Trinity-Term were in ancient time either no Terms at all, or but as relics of Michaelmass and Easter-Terms, rather than just Terms of themselves: Some courses of the Chequer yet incline to it. And we were both of the mind, that want of business (which no doubt in those days was very little) by reason Suits were then for the most part determined in inferior Courts, might be the cause thereof. But I since observe another cause, viz. That Septuagesima or Church-time one while trod so near upon the heels of Octabis Epiphaniae (I mean came so soon after it,) as it left not a whole week for Hilary-Term; and again, another while, Trinity Sunday fell out so late in the year, that the common necessity of Hay-seed and Harvest, made that Term very little and unfrequented. For insomuch as Easter (which is the Clavis, as well to shut up Hilary-Term, as to open Trinity-Term) may, according to the general Council of Nice, holden in the year 322. fall upon any day between the 21 st. of March exclusively, which then was the Aequinoctium, and the 25. of April inclusively, (as the farthest day that the Sunday following the Vernal Fullmoon can happen upon;) Septuagesima may sometimes be upon the eighteenth of January, and then could they in ancient time not have above four days Term, and we at this day no Term at all, because we begin it not till the 23 d. of January, which may be six days after Septuagesima, and within the time of Church-Vacation. But what Hilary-Term hath now lost at the beginning of it, it hath gained at the latter ending. Of Trinity-Term I shall speak more by and by. CHAP. XIII. Easter-Term. EAster-Term, which now beginneth two days after Quindena Paschae, began then as the Law of Edward the Confessor appointed it, at Octabis. This is verified by Glanvil, who maketh one of his Writs returnable thus; Rex etc. Summon per bonos summonitores quatuor legales milites de vicineto de Stock, quod sint ad Clausum Paschae coram me vel Justiciis meis apud Westmonasterium ad eligendum supra sacramentum suum duodecim legales milites. But, as it began then nine days sooner than it now doth, so it ended six or seven days sooner, viz. before the Vigil of Ascension; which I take to be the meaning of the Law of Edward the Confessor, appointing the time from the Ascension (inclusiuè) to the Octaves of Pentecost, with Ascension-Eve, to be dies pacis Ecclesiae, and Vacation. CHAP. XIV. Trinity-Term. TRinity-Term therefore in those days began as it now doth (in respect of the Returns) at Octab. Pentecostes, which being always the day after 〈◊〉 32. 〈◊〉 VIII. 〈◊〉 21. Trinity Sunday, is now by the Stat. of 32. of Hen. VIII. appointed to be called Crastino Trinitatis. But it seemeth that the Stat. of 51. of Hen. III. changed the beginning of this Term from Crastino Trinitatis, to Octabis Trinitatis, and that therefore the Stat. of Hen. VIII. did no more in this point than reduce it to the former original. As touching the end of this Term, it seemeth also that the said Stat. of 51. Hen. III. assigned the same to be within two or three days after Quindena Sancti Johannis, (which is about the twelfth of July) for that Statute nameth no Return after. But, for aught that hindereth by the Canons, it is tanquam Terminus sine Termino; for, there was no set Canon or Ecclesiastical Law (that I can find) to abridge the continuance thereof till Michaelmass, unless the seven days next before St. John Baptist, were (according to the Canon of Erpford) used as days of intermission, when they fell after the Octaves of Pentecost as commonly they do; tho' this year 1614 four of them fell within them: and except the Ember-days meet after Holy-Rood; for Jejunia quatuor Temporum, as well by the Laws of Canutus, and Edward the Confessor, as by all other almost before recited, are either expressly or implicitly exempted from the days of Law. But when Trinity Sunday fell near the feast of St. John Baptist, than was the first part of this Term so thrust up between those days of the Church, that it was very short; and the latter part being always fixed, did so hinder Hay-seed and Harvest following, that either the course of it must be shortened, or it must still usurp upon the time, allotted by nature to collect the fruits of the earth. For as Religion closed the Courts of Law in other parts of the year, so now doth public necessity stop the progress of them; following the Constitution of 1 C●d. de ●●ri●s, l 2. ca 20. l. ●in. & ff. l. omnes dies. Theodosius, thus decreeing;— Omnes dies jubemus esse juridicos. Illos tamen remanere feriarum dies fas est geminis mensibus; ad requiem laboris indulgentior annus excepit: aestivis quoque fervoribus mitigandis, & autumpnis fructibus decerpendis. This is also confirmed in the 2 Tit. de F●●iis, Ca 5. Canon Conquestus; and in 3 Can. 15. quaest. 4. Gratian with the Glosses upon them, to which I leave you. But it is of old thus expressed by 4 Silvarum 〈…〉. Statius, as if it were ex jure Gentium: Certe jam Latiae non miscent jurgia Leges, Et pacem piger Annus habet, messesque reversae Dimisere Forum: nec jam tibi turba r●orum Vestibulo, querulique rogant exire Clientes. The Latian Laws do no man now molest, But grant this weary season peace and rest; The Courts are stopped when Harvest comes about, The Plaintiff or Defendant stirs not out. So the Longobards (our brethren as touching Saxon original) appointed for their Vintage a particular Vacation of thirty days, which 5 Hist. L●ng●b. Lib. 3. cap. 12. Paulus Diaconus doth thus mention: Proficiscentes autem eo ad villam, ut juxta ritum imperialem triginta 1 Wisegoth. Lib. 2. tit. 1. l. 11. diebus ad vindemiam jocundaretur. So also the Western Goths (a branch of the Northern Nations) ordained pro messivis feriis, à 15. Kal. Augusti, usque ad 15. Kal. Septembris, etc. observandas. Whereby it appeareth that this time was not only a time of Vacation in those ancient days, but also of feasting and merriment, for receiving the fruits of the earth; as at Nabal's and Absalom's Sheepshearing, and in divers parts of England at this 1 Sam. 25. 4. 2 Sam. 13. 23. day. So the Normans, whose Terms were once not so much differing from ours, might not hold their Assizes or times of Law, but after Easter and Harvest; (that is, after the times of holy Church and public necessity) as appeareth by their Custumary. And forasmuch as the 2 Swainmote or Swanimote (from the Saxon sƿaegn, i. e. a Country Clown or Freeholder, and mot or gemot Conventus) is a Court of Freeholders' within the Forest. See 3. Hen. VIII. ca 8. Swainmote-Courts are by the ancient Forest-laws appointed to be kept fifteen days before Michaelmass; it seemeth to be intended that Harvest was then done, or that in Forests little or no corn was then used to be sown. But it is to be remembered, that this Vacation by reason of Harvest, Hay-seed, Vintage, etc. was not of so much solemnity as those in the other parts of the year, and therefore called of the Civilians, Dies feriati minus solennes; because they were not dedicated divino cultui, but humanae necessitati. Therefore tho' Law business was prohibited on these days, to give ease and freedom unto Suitors whilst they attended on the Storehouse of the Commonwealth; yet was it not otherwise than that by consent of parties they might proceed in this Vacation; whereof see the 3 Lib. 2. cap. 21. Decreta Gregorii. To this effect, in a MS. of the lives of the Abbots of St. Alban, I meet with this precedent: That 4. Non. Aug. Anno Dom. 1328. Indictione 11. Comparentibus judicialiter coram nobis Offic. Curio Eborum. Commissario Generali in majore Ecclesia Eborum loco 〈…〉 pro Tribunali sedentibus fratre Johanne de Redburne, 〈…〉 S. Albani, Ordinis S. Benedicti Lincolniensis Dioeces. Procuratore, R●●g. Virorum Dominorum Abbatis & Conventus ejusdem Monasterii verorum Patronorum Ecclesiae de Appleton in Rydale Eborum. Dioc. Procuratorio pro eisdem ex una, ac Domino Waltero Flemengs Rectore ejusdem Ecclesiae personaliter ex altera: Idem Dominus Walterus Rector, tempore messium non obstante, ipsoque tunc in nobis ut in judice suo ad infra scripta judicialiter consentiente, fatebatur se teneri dictis Dominis Abbati & Conventui & eorum Monasterio in 14. libris argenti, nomine pensionis sex marcarum annuarum eisdem Religiosis ab eo & dicta sua Ecclesia de tempore quo Rector ejusdem Ecclesiae extitit, debit. & per eundem per idem tempus subtractis. CHAP. XV. Of Michaelmass-Term according to the ancient Constitutions. MIchaelmass-Term (as the Canons and Laws aforesaid leave it) was more uncertain for the beginning than for the end. It appeareth by a Fine taken at Norwich, 18. Hen. III. that the Term was then holden there, and began within the Octaves of Saint Michael; for the Cyrograph of it is; Haec est finalis concordia facta in Curia Domini Regis apud Norwicum, die Martis proximo post festum Sancti Michaelis, anno regni Regis Henrici filii Regis Johannis 18. coram Tho. de Mulet, Rob. de Lexint, Olivero, etc. I observe that the Tuesday next after St. Michael can (at the farthest) be but the seventh day after it, and yet it then must be a day within the Octaves; whereas the Term 1 Before the abbreviation by 16. Car. I. cap. 6. now beginneth not till the third day after the Octaves. But 2 Dial. lib. 2. cap. 2. Gervasius Tilburiensis, who lived in Hen. II's time, hath a Writ in these words:— N. Rex Anglorum, [illi vel illi] Vicecomiti Jalutem. Vide, sicut teipsum & omnia tua diligis, quod sis ad Scaccarium [ibi vel ibi in Crastino Sancti Michaelis, vel in Crastino Clausi Paschae] & habeas ibi tecum quicquid debes de veteri firma & nova, & nominatim haec debita subscript. viz. etc. By which it appeareth that the Term in the Exchequer, as touching Sheriffs and Accomptants, and consequently in the other parts, began then as now it doth, saying that the Statute De Scaccario, 51. Hen. III. hath since appointed, That Sheriffs and Accomptants shall come to the Exchequer the Monday after the feast of St. Michael, and the Monday after the Vtas of Easter * But the A●signees to ta●e cognizance of weights and measures, by the Statute of 14. Ed. 3. c. 12. are notwithstanding 〈…〉 their Estreats ●endemaine d● S. Mich●l, 〈◊〉 morrow after 〈…〉 Rastal, weights and measures. . Which time, not being ferial or Church-days, is freely allowed to Term business, if the Octaves of St. Michael had no privilege; of which hereafter. It is to be noted that the Term in the Exchequer hath one Return at the beginning of every Term before the first Return in other Courts, excepting Trinity-Term; viz. Crastino S. Michaelis, in Michaelmass-Term; Octabis S. Hilarii, in Hilary-Term; and Octabis or Clausum Paschae, in Easter-Term. And it seemeth, that Crastino Trinitatis was so likewise in Trinity-Term before the 3 Ca 21. Stat. 32. Hen. VIII. And these returns or the space of eight days, in which the Exchequer is open before the full Term, (which now we commonly call the beginning of the Term) are counted to be Termtime, as appeareth by the said Statute, where it is thus enacted; That Trinity-Term shall begin the Monday next after Trinity Sunday, for keeping of the Essoignes, Proffers, Returns, and other Ceremonies heretofore used, etc. And that the full Term of the said Trinity-Term, shall yearly for ever begin the Friday * Here seems to be something wanting. .... The end is certainly prefixed by the Canons and Laws aforesaid, that it may not extend into Advent. And it holdeth still at that mark; saving that because Advent Sunday is movable, according to the Dominical letter, and may fall upon any day between the twenty sixth of November and the fourth of December, therefore the twenty eighth of November (as a middle period by reason of the Feast and Eve of St. Andrew) hath been appointed to it. Howbeit when Advent Sunday falleth on the twenty seventh of November, as sometimes it doth, then is the last day of the Term (contrary to the Canons and former Constitutions) held in Advent, and consequently void, if custom help it not, or, for more security the Statute of 3. Edw. I. ca 48. where the Bishops, at the King's request, admit Assizes and Inquests to be taken in Advent, as it after shall more largely appear. CHAP. XVI. The later Constitutions of the Terms. TO leave obscurity and come nearer the light, it seemeth by the Statutes of 51. Hen. III. called Die communes in Banco, that the Terms did then either begin and end as they do now, or that those Statutes did lay them out, and that the Statute of 36. Edw. III. cap. 15. confirmed that use: For the Returns there mentioned are neither other, more or fewer than at this day. CHAP. XVII. How Trinity-term was altered and shortened. TRinity-Term is altered and shortened by the Statute of 32. Hen. VIII. chap. 21. which hath ordained it quoad sessionem, to begin for ever the Friday after Corpus Christi day, and to continue nineteen days; whereas in elder times it began two or three days sooner. So that Corpus Christi day being a movable Feast, this Term cannot hold any certain station in the year, and therefore this year 1614 it began on St. John Baptist's day, and the last year it ended on his Eve. Hereupon, tho' by all the Canons of the Church and former Laws, the Feast of St. John Baptist was a solemn day, and exempt from legal proceedings in Courts of Justice; yet is it now no Vacation day, when Corpus Christi falleth (as it did this year 1614) the very day before it: For that the Statute hath appointed the Term to begin the Friday next after Corpus Christi day, which was the day next this year before St. John Baptist, and so the Term must of necessity begin on Saint John Baptist's day. This deceived all the Ptognosticators, who counting St. John Baptist for a grand day, and no day in Court, appointed the Term in their Almanacs to begin the day after, and consequently to hold a day longer; deceiving many by that their error. But, the aforesaid Statute of 32. Hen. VIII. changed the whole frame of this Term: For it made it begin sooner by a Return, viz. Crastino Sanctae Trinitatis, and thereby brought Octabis Trinitatis, which before was the first Return, to be the second, and Quindena Trinitatis which before was the second, now to be the third; and instead of the three other Returns of Crastino Octabis, and Quindena Sancti Johannis, it appointed that which before was no Return, but now the fourth and last, called Tres Trinitatis. The altering and abbreviation of this Term is declared by the preamble of the Statute, to have risen out of two causes, one for health, in dismissing the Concourse of people in that contagious time of the year; the other for wealth, that the Subject might attend his Harvest, and gathering in the fruits of the earth. But there seemeth to be a third also not mentioned in the Statute, and that is, the uncertain station, length and Returns of the first part of this Term, which, like an Eccentric, was one year near to St. John Baptist, another year far removed from it; and thereby making the Term not only various, but one year longer, and another shorter, according as Trinity Sunday (being the Clavis to it) fell nearer or farther off from St. John Baptist. For if it fell betimes in the year, than was this Term very long, and the two first Returns of Octabis and Quindena Trinitatis might be passed and gone a fortnight and more, before Crastino Sancti Johannis could come in: And if it fell late, (as this year 1614 it did) then would Crastino Sancti Johannis be come and passed, before Octabis Trinitatis were gone out. So that many times one or two of the first Returns of this Term (for aught that I can see) must in those days needs be lost. * This chapter is inserted in the ●●●tion of 16●4 CHAP. XVIII. How Michaelmass-Term was abbreviated by Act of Parliament, 16. Car. I. Cap. 6. THe last place our Statute-book affords upon this Subject of the limits and extent of the Terms, is the Stat. 16. Car. I. Chap. 6. entitled, An Act concerning the limitation and abbreviation of Michaelmass-Term. For whereas by former Statutes it doth appear, that Michaelmass-Term did begin in Octabis Sanctae Michaelis, that Statute appoints, that the first Return in this Term shall ever hereafter be à die Sancti Michaelis in tres septimanas, so cutting off no less than two Returns from the ancient beginning of this Term, viz. Octabis Sancti Michaelis, & à die Sancti Michaelis in quindecim dies, and consequently making the beginning of it fall a fortnight later than before. Wherefore the first day in this Term will always be the twenty third day of October, unless it happen to be Sunday, for than it must be deferred till the day following; upon which account we find it accordingly placed on the twenty fourth for the year 1681. This is all the alteration that Statute mentions, and therefore for the end of Michaelmass-Term, I refer the Reader to what our Author has said already in the 15 th'. Chapter. It may not be amiss in pursuit of our Author's method to set down the motives of making this abbreviation as we find them reckoned up in the Preamble to that Statute. There we find, that the old beginning of Michaelmass-term, was generally found to be very inconvenient to his Majesty's subjects both Nobles and others. First, For the keeping of Quarter-sessions next after the feast of St. Michael the Archangel; Secondly, For keeping their Leets, Law-days and Court-Barons: Thirdly, For the sowing of land with Winter-corn, the same being the chief time of all the year for doing it; Fourthly, For the disposing, and setting in order of all their Winter husbandry and business; Fifthly, For the receiving and paying of Rents; Sixthly, Because in many parts of this Kingdom, especially the most Northern, Harvest is seldom or never Inned till three weeks after the said Feast. All which affairs they could before by no means attend, in regard of the necessity of their coming to the said Term, so speedily after the feast of St. Michael the Archangel, to appear upon Juries, and to follow their Causes and Suits in the Law. SECT. V. Other Considerations concerning Termtime. HAving thus laid out the frame of the Terms, both according to the Ancient and Modern Constitutions, it remaineth that we speak something of other points properly incident to this part of our division touching Termtime, viz. 1. Why the Courts sit not in the Afternoons. 2. Why not upon some whole days, as on Grand-days, double Feasts, and other exempted days, and the reason of them. 3. Why some Law business may be done on days exempted. 4. Why the end of Michaelmass-Term is sometimes holden in Advent, and of Hilary-Term in Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima. 5. Why the Assizes are holden in Lent, and at times generally prohibited by the Church. 6. Of Returns. 7. Of the Quarta dies post. 8. Why I have cited so much Canon, Civil, Feodal, and foreign Laws in this discourse, with an excursion into the original of our Laws. CHAP. I. Why the High Courts sit not in the Afternoons. IT is now to be considered, why the high Courts of Justice sit not in the Afternoons. For it is said in Exodus, that Moses judged the Israelites Chap. 18. v. 14. from Morning to Evening. And the Romans used the Afternoon as well as the Forenoon, yea, many times the Afternoon and not the Forenoon, as upon the days called Endotercismi or Intercisi, whereof the Forenoon was Nefastus or Vacation, and the Afternoon Fastus or Law-day, as we showed in the beginning. And the Civilians following that Law do so continue them amongst us in their Term at this day. But our Ancestors and other the Northern Nations being more prone to distemper and excess of diet (as the Canon Law noteth of them) used the Forenoon only, lest repletion should bring upon them drowsiness and oppression of spirit; according to that of St. Jerome, Pinguis Venter non gignit mentem tenuem. To confess the truth, our Saxons (as appeareth by 1 Hist. Lib. 6. Huntingdon) were immeasurably given to drunkenness. And it is said in 2 Cap. 10. Ecclesiastes, Vae Terrae cujus Principes mane comedunt. Therefore to avoid the inconvenience depending hereon, the Council of Nice ordained, that Judices non nisi jejuni leges & judicia decernant. And in the Council of Salegunstad it was after decreed, Vt lectio Nicaeni Concilii recitetur, which being done in the words aforesaid, the same was likewise there confirmed. According to this, in the Laws of Carolus Magnus the Emperor it is ordained, ( 3 Tit. 52. cap. 4. Logobard lib. 2.) Vt Judices jejuni causas audiant & discernant: and again in the 4 Lib. 3. Can. 38. Capitulars Caroli & Lodovici, ne placitum 5 Archaeol. verb. Comes cap. 1. §. 15. & alia Capit. Caroli §. 4. Comes habeat nisi jejunus. Where the word Comes, according to the phrase of that time, is used for Judex, as elsewhere we have at large declared. To the same effect is the Capitular ad Legem Salicam: and out of these and such other Constitutions ariseth the rule of the Canon Law, that Quae à prandio fiunt Consultationes, inter decreta non referuntur. Yet I find that Causes might be heard and judged in the Afternoon; for in Capitulars lib. 2. Can. 33. and again lib. 4. Can. 16. it is said, Causae viduarum, pupillorum & pauperum audiantur & definiantur ante Meridiem, Regis vero & Potentium post Meridiem. Which tho' it seem contradictory to the Constitutions aforesaid, yet I conceive them to be thus reconcilable: that the Judges (sitting then but seldom) continued their Courts both Forenoon and Afternoon, from Morning till Evening without dinner or intermission, as at this day they may, and often do, upon great Causes: tho' being risen and dining, they might not meet again; yet might they not sit by night, or use candle light, 6 De Offic. deal. Consuluit. Quod de nocte non est honestum judicium exercere. And from these ancient Rites of the Church and Empire is our Law derived, which prohibiteth our 〈…〉 Jurours, being Judices de facto, to have meat, drink, fire or candlelight, till they be agreed of their verdict. It may be here demanded how it cometh to pass, that our Judges after dinner do take Assizes and Nisi prius in the Guild-hall of London, and in their Circuits? I have yet no other answer but that ancient Institutions are discontinued often by some custom grating in upon them, and changed often by some later Constitution, of which kind the instances aforesaid seem to be. For Assizes were ordained many ages after by Henry II. as appeareth by the Charter of 1 Pat. 5. R. 2. part 2. m. 12. Beverly, Glanvil and Radulphus Niger; and Nisi prius by 2 13. Edw. I. ca 30. Edward I. in the Statutes of Westminster 2. tho' I see not but in taking of them the ancient course might have been continued, if haste would suffer it. CHAP. II. Why they sit not at all some days. THough there be many days in the Terms, which by ancient Constitutions before recited are exempted from Lawbusiness, as those of the Apostles, etc. and that the 3 An. 5. & 6. Edu. 6. cap. 3. Statute of Edw. VI appointed many of them to be kept holidays, as dedicated, not unto Saints, but unto divine worship, which we also at this day retain as holidays: Yet do not the high Courts forbear sitting in any of them, saving on the feast of the Purification, the Ascension, St. John Baptist, All-Saints, and the day after, (tho' not a feast) called All-souls. When the others lost their privilege and came to be Term-days, I cannot find; it sufficeth that Custom hath repealed them by confession of the 4 Tabien. v. Feriae. § 10. Canonists. Yet it seemeth to me, there is matter for it in the Constitutions of our Church, under Islepe Archbishop of Canterbury, in the time of Edward III. For tho' many ancient Laws and the Decretals of 5 Tit. de Feriis, ca Conquestus. Gregory IX. had ordained Judicialem strepitum diebus conquiescere feriatis; yet in a Synod then holden, wherein all the holidays are appointed and particularly recited, no restraint of Judicature or Forensis strepitus is imposed, but a cessation only ab universis servilibus operibus, etiam Reipublicae utilibus. Which tho' it be in the phrase that God himself useth touching many great Feasts, viz. 6 Leu. 23. 21, 25. Omne servile opus non facietis in iis, yet it is not in that wherein he instituteth the seventh day to be the Sabbath, 7 Exod. 20. 10. I●●m, Leu. 23. 3. Non facies omne opus in eo, without servile, Thou shalt do no manner of work therein. Now the Act of Judicature, and of hearing and determining Controversies is not opus servile, but honoratum & plane Regium, and so not within the prohibition of this our Canon, which being the latter seemeth to qualify all the former. Yea the Canonists and Casuists themselves not only expound opus servile of corporal and mechanic labour, but admit twenty six several cases, where (even in that very kind) dispensation lieth against the Canons, and by much more reason then, with this in question. It may be said that this Canon consequently giveth liberty to hold plea and Courts, upon other Festivals in the Vacations. I confess that so it seemeth; but this Canon hath no power to alter the bounds and course of the Terms, which before were settled by the Statutes of the Land, so that in that point it wrought nothing. Why they sit on Rogation-days. But here ariseth another question, how it chanceth that the Courts sit in Easter-Term upon the Rogation-days, it being expressly forbidden by the Council of Medard, and by the intention of divers other Constitutions? It seemeth that it never was so used in England, or at least not for many ages, especially since Gregory IX. insomuch that among the days wherein he prohibiteth Forensem strepitum, clamourous pleading, etc. he nameth them not. And tho' he did, yet the Glossographers say, that a Nation may by Custom erect a Feast that is not commanded by the Canons of the Church. 1 Tabien. Feriae §. 10. Et eodem modo posset ex consuetudine introduci, quod aliqua quae sunt de praecepto non essent de praecepto, sicut de tribus diebus Rogationum, etc. To be short, I find no such privilege for them in our Courts, as that they should be exempt from suits; tho' we admit them other Church rites and ceremonies. Why on some festivals, and not on others. We must now (if we can) show why the Courts, sitting upon so many Ferial and holidays, do forbear to sit upon some others, which before I mentioned; the Purification, Ascension, St. John Baptist, All-Saints, etc. For in the Synod under Islepe before mentioned, no prerogative is given to them above the rest, that fall in the Terms; as namely, St. Mark and St. Philip and Jacob, when they do fall in Easter-Term, St. Peter in Trinity-Term, * Before the abbreviation, 16 Car. 1. St. Luke and SS. Simon and Judas in Michaelmass-Term. It may be said, that, although the Synod did only prohibit Opera servilia to be done on Festival-days, as the offence most in use at that time; yet did it not give licence to do any Act that was formerly prohibited by any Law or Canon. And therefore if by colour thereof, or any former use (which is like enough) the Courts did sit on lesser Festivals, yet they never did it on the greater, among which as majoris cautelae gratia, those Opera servilia are there also prohibited to be done on Easter-day, Pentecost, and the Sunday itself. The difference of Festivals. Let us then see which are the greater Feasts, and by what merit they obtain the privilege, that the Courts of Justice sit not on them. As for Sunday, we shall not need to speak of it, being canonised by God himself. As for Easter and Whitsunday, they fall not in the Terms: yet I find a Parliament held, or at least begun on Whitsunday. But touching Feasts in general, it is to be understood, that the Canonists, and such as write 2 Durandi lib. 7. c. 1. n. 31. De Divinis Officiis, divide them into three sorts, viz. Festa in totum duplicia, simpliciter duplicia, & semiduplicia. And they call them duplicia, or double Feasts, for that all, or some parts of the service, on those days were begun Voce Duplici, that is, by two singing-men; whereas on other days all was done by one. Our Cathedral Churches do yet observe it: I mean not to stay upon it: look the 3 Durandi lib. 7. ca 1. Rationale; which Feasts were of every of these kinds. The ordinary Apostles were of the last, and therefore our Courts made bold with them: But the Purification, Ascension, St. John Baptist, with some others that fall not in the Term, were of the first, and because of this and some other prerogatives were also called Festa Majora, Festa Principalia, & dies novem Lectionum, ordinarily, double Feasts, and Grand days. Mention is made of them in an 4 Rast. Excom. 5. Ordinance 8. Edw. III. That Writs were ordained to the Bishops, to accurse all and every of the perturbers of the Church, etc. every Sunday and double Feast, etc. But we must needs show why they were called Dies novem Lectionum; for so our old Pica de Sarum styleth them, and therein lieth their greatest privilege. After the Arian Heresy against the Trinity, was by the Fathers of that time most powerfully confuted and suppressed, the Church in memory of that most blessed victory, and for better establishing of the Orthodox Faith in that point, did ordain, that upon divers Festival-days in the year, a particular Lesson touching the nature of the Trinity, besides the other eight, should be read in their service, with rejoicing and thanksgiving to God for suppressing that horrible Heresy: And for the greater solemnity, some 5 Belethus Explicat. ca 158. Bishop, or the chiefest Clergyman present, did perform that duty. Thus came these days to their styles aforesaid, and to be honoured with extraordinary Music, Church-service, Robes, Apparel, Feasting, etc. with a particular exemption from Law-Tryals amongst the Normans, who therefore kept them the more respectively here in England: Festa enim Trinitatis (saith Belethus) digniori cultu sunt celebrandi. 〈…〉 In France they have two sorts of Grand days, both differing from ours: First, they call them, Les Grand jours, wherein an extraordinary Sessions is holden in any Circuit, by virtue of the King's Commission directed to certain Judges of Parliament. Secondly, those in which the Peers of France hold once or twice a year their Courts of Haught Justice; all other Courts being in the mean time silent. See touching these, Loyseau De Seigneures. 〈…〉 To come back to England, and our own Grand days, I see some difference in accounting of them: Durandus in the first Chapter of his seventh Book, reckoneth the Purification, Ascension and St. John Baptist to be Grand days, not mentioning All-Saints; but both he in his 34th. Chapter, and Belethus in his— do call it Festum Maximum & Generale, being not only the Feast of Apostles and Martyrs, but of the Trinity, Angels and Confessors, as Durandus termeth it. And that honour therefore and duty quoth in singulis valet, potentius valebit in conjunctis. As for the Feast of All-Souls, neither Durandus nor Belethus, nor any ancient of those times (for they lived almost 400. years since) do record it for a Festival. But our Countryman Walsingham the Monk of St. Alban saith, that Simon Archbishop of Canterbury in the year 1328. at a Provincial Council holden at London, did ordain, Quod die Parasceve & in commemoratione Omnium Animarum ab omni servili opere cessaretur. Surely he mistook it; for neither is it so mentioned in Lindewood, reciting that Canon, nor in the ancient Copy of the Council itself, where the two Feasts canonised by him are the Paresceve and the Conception of the Blessed Virgin. Yet doubtless, whensoever it was instituted it was a great Feast with us, tho' no where else. For the old Breviarium Eboracensis Ecclesiae, doth not only set it down in the Calendar for a double Feast, but appointeth after, the whole service, with the nine Lessons for it, as a Feast of the Trinity. And though neither the Statute of Edward VI. nor our Church at this day do receive it; yet being formerly a Vacation day (as it seemeth) our Judges still forbear to sit upon it, as not hitherto made a day in Courts, tho' deprived of Festival rites, and therefore neither graced with Robes nor Feasting. The Feast of St. Peter ●nd St. 〈◊〉 The Feast also of St. Peter and Paul on the 29 th'. of June was a double feast, yet it is now become single, and our Judges sit upon it. I confess I have not found the reason, unless that by Decanonizing St. Paul and so leaving St. Peter single, we allow him no prerogative above the other Apostles, lest it should give colour for his Primacy; for to St. Paul, as one born out of time, we allow no Festival, either in the Statute of Edward VI or in the Almanacs and Kalendars of our Church. And why St. Peter hath it not is the more observable, for that he not only is deprived of the ancient rights of his Apostleship, contrary to the Canons (as the other are;) but also of the privilege given him in that place by Pope Nicholas the 2 d. in a Bull to Edward the Confessor; and being Patron of the Paroche and Dedication of Westminster, where the Terms are kept, and where by the right of his day he was also privileged from Court business. Other Festivals I inquire not after, as of St. Dunstan and the rest that stand rubricate in old Kalendars; they being either abrogated by old Canons of our own Church, or the Statute of Edward VI whereof I must note by the way that I find it repealed by Queen Mary, but not revived by Queen Elizabeth or since 1 It seemeth that the Statute of 5. and 6. of Edw. VI Cap. 3. notwithstanding the Reveal of it amongst a multitude of others by Queen Mary, Anno 1. Sessione 2. Cap. 2. is revived again, tho' not by Queen Elizabeth, yet by 1. Jacobi Cap. 25. In these words; That an Act made in the first year of the Reign of Queen Mary, entitled, an Act for the repeal of certain Statutes made in the time of King Edw. VI shall stand repealed. See Poulton too. . St. George's day. I am carried from the brevity I intended, yet all this lieth in my way; nor is it out of it to speak a word of St. George's-day, which sometimes falleth in Easter-Term, and is kept in the Court Royal with great solemnity, but not in the Courts Judicial. Tho' he stood before in the Calendar, and was the English Patron of elder time, yet H. Chichley Archbishop of Canterbury gave him his greatness, by Canonising his day to be as a double Feast and Grand day, as well among the Clergy as Laity; and that both the one and other repairing to their Churches should celebrate it (as Christmass-day) free from servile-work, in ardent prayers for safety of the King and Kingdom. The occasion of this Constitution was, to excite King Henry the V. being upon his Expedition for Normandy; and tho' this, among other holidays, was abolished by the Statute 5. and 6. of Edw. VI. yet it being the Festival of the Knights of the Garter, it was provided in the Statute, That the Knights might celebrate it on the 22 d. 23 d. and 24 th'. of April. Other Feasts there were of this nature; as that of St. Wenefred on the second of November, which is in effect no day of sitting, but applied to the pricking of Sheriffs. These are vanished, and in their room we have one new memorably day of intermitting Court and Law business for a little in the morning, whilst the Judges in their Robes go solemnly to the great Church at Westminster on the fifth of November yearly, to give God thanks for our great delivery from the Powder-Treason, and hear a Sermon touching it; which done, they return to their Benches. The Institution hereof is by Act of Parliament Jacobi, and it is of the kind of those Ferial days, which being ordained by the Emperors, not by the Popes, are in Canon and Civil Law called Dies Feriati repentini. I will go no farther among the tedious subtleties of distinguishing of days; I have not been matriculated in the Court of Rome: And I confess I neither do nor can explain many objections and contrarieties that may be gathered in these passages. Some Oedipus or Ariadne must help me out. CHAP. III. Why some Law business may be done on days exempted. IN the mean time let us see, why some Law business may be done on days exempted, and sometimes on Sunday itself, notwithstanding any thing before mentioned. For as in Termtime some days are exempted from Term business, and some portion of the day from sitting in Courts; so in the Vacation-time and days exempted, some Law business may be performed by express permission of the Canon Law, according to that of the 1 Virgil. Georg. lib. 1. Poet in the Georgics, Quip etiam Festis quaedam exercere diebus Fas & jura sinunt— The Synod of Medard admitteth matters the pace & concordia, to be dispatched both on holy days and on Sunday itself: the Laws of Hen. I. matters of Concord and doing Fealty to the Lord: the decree of Gregory IX. cases of necessity and doing piety, according to that of 2 Lib. Ep. Prosper, Non recto servat legalia Sabbata cultu, Qui pietatis opus credit in his vetitum. The rule is verified by our Saviour's healing on the Sabbath. Out of these and such other authorities of the Laws Ecclesiastical and Civil, cited in the Glosses, the Canonists have collected these Cases, wherein Judges may proceed legally upon the days prohibited, or do the things herein following. For matters of 1 Conc. Medard. Can. 22. q. 5. ca 17. Peace and Concord, by reason whereof our Judges take the acknowledgement of Fines, Statutes, Recognizances, etc. upon any day, even the Sabbath-day, (tho' it were better than forborn, if necessity require it not.) For suppressing of Traitors, Thiefs, and notoriours Offenders, which may otherwise trouble the peace of the Commonwealth, and endanger the Kingdom. For manumission of Bondmen: a work of Piety. For saving that which otherwise would perish: a work of Necessity. For doing that, which time overslipt, cannot be done: As for making Appeals within the time limited, etc. For taking the benefit of a Witness that otherwise would be lost, as by Death, or Departure. For making the son sui Juris: as if, amongst us, the Lord should discharge his Ward of Wardship. All which are expressed in these Verses; Haec faciunt causas Festis tractare diebus, Pax, Scelus admissum, Manumissio, Res peritura, Terminus expirans, mora testis abesse volentis, Cumque potestatis Patriae jus filius exit. Or thus according to Panormitanus; Ratione Appellationis, Pacis, Necessitatis, Celeritatis, Pietatis, Matrimonii, Latrocinii, & ubicunque in mora promptum est periculum. So likewise by consent of parties upon Dies Feriati minus solennes, viz. Harvest, Hay-seed, etc. as we have said before. And divers others there are, whereof see the 2 Can. 15. q. 4. Glosses in Gratian, and in the Chapter Conquestus; but especially the Title 3 Can. 5. lib. 2. Tit. 12. De Feriis & Dilationibus in ff. from whence most of the premises are deduced▪ and where also, by a Constitution of Trajan, Military business may be done in diebus feriis, and at all times. 4 Ibid. L. Diu. Trajanus. Rescripsit (saith the Law) ferias tantum à forensibus negotiis dare vacationem; ea tamen quae ad disciplinam militarem pertinerent, esse feriatis diebus peragenda. Upon these reasons, the Admiral-Court is always open; for that strangers and Merchants and sea▪ faring-men, must take the opportunity of Tides and of Winds, and other necessities; and cannot without ruin or great prejudice attend the solemnity of Courts and dilatory Plead. The Marshal's Court also for Military matters, falleth within the privilege granted by Trajan: yet hath it observed, as near as conveniently it may, the Canons of the Church; as forbearing to assign battle in Quadragesima & temporibus prohibitis. And so lately in the case between the Lo. Raye and Mr. ramsey. So likewise the Chancery, being a Court of piety, is said to be always open: but I take this to be understood as it is Officina brevium and Consistorium aequi & boni; not where it is Praetorium Juris communis, and proceedeth in course of the Common Law. As for the Star-chamber, it is in lieu of that which was in ancient time the Counsel-chamber, and Specula Regni, the watchtower of the Kingdom: where the Barons and other of the King's Counsel used to meet ad prospiciendam fovendamque Remp. to discover, prevent, and suppress all dangers and enormities occurrent, and to provide for the safety and good of the Kingdom. It was necessary therefore that this Session should not only be daily open, but (as is said of the house of Fame) 1 Metam. Lib. 12. Nocte dieque patens; for an evil may happen in the night that would be too late to prevent in the morning. And therefore the Statute of 2 H. 7. ca 1. 21. H. 8. ca 20. 3. Henr. VII. and 21. Henr. VIII. enlarging the jurisdiction hereof, do not circumscribe it either with Termtime or days of sitting. CHAP. IU. Why the end of Michaelmass-Term is sometimes holden in Advent; and of Hilary, in Septuagesima, etc. BUt the Terms sometimes extend themselves into the days of the Church which we call Vacation; as when Advent Sunday chanceth on the 27 th'. of November, than Michaelmass-Term borroweth the day after out of Advent; and when Septuagesima followeth suddenly upon the Purification, Hilary-Term not only usurpeth upon it and Sexagesima, (which by the precedent of the Church of Rome here before mentioned it may do,) but also upon Quinquagesima, Ash-wednesday, and Quadragesima itself; for all which there is matter enough in one place or 3 Aimo 1027. & 1190. Hoveden p. 663. other already shown. Yet it is farther countenanced by the Statute of 3. Edw. I. cap. 48. where it is thus provided; Forasmuch as it is great charity to do right unto all men at all times (when need shall be;) by assent of all the Prelates it was provided, that Assizes of Novel Disseisin, Mordauncester, and Darrain Presentment, should be taken in Advent, Septuagesima and Lent, even as well as Inquests may be taken, and that at the special request of the King made unto the Bishops. Where it is to be noted, that Inquisitions might be taken before this Statute within the days prohibited, or Church time, and that this Licence extended but to the particularities therein mentioned. CHAP. V. Why Assizes be holden in Lent. IT seemeth that by virtue of this Statute, or some other particular dispensation from the Bishops, Assizes began first to be holden in Lent, contrary to the Canons. I find in an ancient Manuscript of the Monastery Fol. 56. b. of St. Alban a dispensation of this kind, thus entitled; Licentia concess. Justice. Reg. de Assis. tenend. sacro tempore non obstante. Pateat universis per praesentes nos Ricardum (miseratione divina) Abbatem Monasterii Sancti Albani, licentiam & potestatem authoritate praesentium dedisse dilecto nobis in Christo Domino Johanni Shardlow & sociis suis Justice. Dom. Regis, Assisas apud Barnet (nostrae jurisdictionis exemptae) die Lunae proximo ante Festum S. Ambrosii capiendi juxta formam, vim, & effectum brevis Domini Regis inde iis directi. In cujus, etc. Anno Domini, etc. Sub magno Sigillo. Whether this was before or after the Statute, it appeareth not; it may seem before; for that otherwise it needed not. But I find 1 In Commiss. ejus. Shardlow to be Justice of Oier in Pickering Forest, 17. Aug. An. 8. Edw. I. If it were after, it seemeth the Writ to the Justices extended to somewhat out of the Statute, and that this Licence was obtained in majorem cautelam. But to conclude; hereby it appeareth that although we find not the reasons of things done in ancient ages, yet nothing was done against the Rules of the Church without special Licence and dispensation * See in the Appendix, at the end of this discourse, the Grants and Licences of this kind made by the Archbishops, and the Bishop ●f Norwich. . The Feast of St. Ambrose mentioned in the Licence was on the fourth of April, which commonly is about a week or two before Easter. And the Abbot of St. Alban, having exempt jurisdiction within the Province of Canterbury, granteth this dispensation to hold Assizes in tempore sacro, as the Rubric explaineth it, lest the words [nostrae jurisdictionis exemptae] might be applied to some layick Franchise: I assure myself there are many of this kind, if they might come to light. And as they granted Licence in times prohibited, so they censured such as offended without Licence; as appeareth by the case of 2 See my Codex Ll. Antiq. An. 1184. b. Sir Gilbert Plumpton An. 1184. who being to be hanged at Worcester upon the Sunday for a Rape committed by him, the Bishop prohibited execution for that day upon pain of Excommunication, etc. CHAP. VI Of the Returns. OF the Returns I will not venture to speak much, but nothing at all of Essoine and Exception-days, for that draweth nearer to the faculty of Lawyers, wherein I mean not to be too busy. The Returns are set days in every Term appointed to the Sheriff, for certifying the Courts what he hath done, in execution of the Writs he received from them. And I take it, that in old time they were the ordinary days set to the Defendants for Appearance, every one of them being a seven-night after another, to the end that the Defendant according to his distance from the place where he was to appear, might have one, two, three, or more of these Returns, that is, so many weeks for his Appearance, as he was Counties off in distance from the Court where he was to appear. This is verified by the Law of 3 Leges Ethelredi Cap. 93. Ethelred the Saxon King, in case of vouching upon Trover. Give he cenne ofer an scira. haebbe an ƿucena fyrrst; give he cenne ofer tƿa scira. haebbe tƿa ƿucena fyrst; give he cenne ofer iii scira. haebbe three ƿucena fyrst; Ofer eal sƿa fela scira. sƿa he cenne. haebbe sƿa feala ƿucena fyrrt; i. e. If the Vouchees dwell one Shire off, let him at first have one week; if two Shires off, let him have two weeks; if three Shires off, let him have three weeks; and for so many Shires as he dwelleth off, let him have so many weeks. The Law of 4 Cap. 41. Henry the First is somewhat more particular; Qui residens est ad domum suam, summoniri debet de placito quolibet cum testibus. Et si d●mi [non] est, idem dicatur vel dapifero, vel denique familiae suae libere denuncietur 〈◊〉 in eodem Comitatu sit, inde ad septem dies terminum habeat; si in alia Schira ●it, 15. dierum terminum habeat; & si in tertio Comitatu sit, 3. Hebdomadae; 〈◊〉 quarto, quartae Hebdomadae; & ultra non procedit ubicunque fuerit in Anglia, 〈◊〉 competens eum detineat * So●●ius. soinius; s●ultra mare est 6. Hebdomadas habeat & unum diem ad accessum & recessum maris, nisi vel occupatio servitii Regis, vel ipsius aegritudo, vel tempestas, vel competens aliquod amplius respectet. The Statute of 1 52. Henr. III. cap. 13. Marlebridge cap. 12. soundeth to this purpose; In Assisis autem ultimae praesentationis & in placito Quare impedit de Ecclesiis vacantibus dentur dies de Quindena in Quindenam, vel de tribus septimanis in tres septimanas, prout locus fuerit propinquus vel remotus. And again, Cap. 26. Sed si vocatus, etc. (ad warrantum coram Justiciar. itinerantibus) fuerit infra Comitatum, tunc injungatur Vicecomiti, quod ipsum infra tertium diem vel quartum (secundum locorum distantiam) faciat venire sicut in itinere Justiciar. fieri consuevit. Et si extra Comitatum maneat, tunc rationabilem habeat Summonitionem 15. dierum ad minus secundum discretionem Justiciar. & Legem Communem. There was also another use of Returns, as appeareth by the Reformed Custumary of Normandy, Artic. the 10 th'. Some of them belonged to Pleas of Goods and Chattels, which we call personal Actions, as those of Octab. Some to Pleas of Land, and real Actions, as those of Quindena. Pleas of Goods and Chattels were holden from Octabis to Octabis; Pleas of land not sooner than from Quindena to Quindena. Nul n'est tenu de respondere de son heretage en moindre tems que de quinzaine in quinzaine. The more solemn Actions had the more solemn Returns, as we see by the 2 51. Henr. III. Stat. of dies communes in Banco, which I leave to my Masters of the Law. I will not speak of the Returns particularly, more than that Octab. is sometimes reckoned by seven days, sometimes by eight; by seven days, excluding the Feast from which it is counted; by eight, including it. And the word is borrowed from the Constitutions of the Church, where the seven days following Easter were appointed to be Ferial-days (as we have showed before) in imitation of the seven days Azymorum, following the Passover in Leu. 23. v. 6. the Levitical Law. But in this manner Octab. Trinitatis always includeth nine days, reckoning Trinity-Sunday for one, by reason the just Octabis falleth on the Sunday following; which being no day in Court, putteth off the Return till the next day after, making Monday always taken for the Octab. unless you will count these two days for no more than one, as the Statute de Anno Bissextili in the like case hath ordained, the superfluous day in the Leap-year (called Intercalaris) and the day going next before, to be accounted but one day. It is here to be noted, that although the Sundays and Grand-days be no days in Court, yet they are numbered among the days of Return, according to the Civil Law, 3 Cod. de dilation. l. sive pars fol. 133. Feriae autem, sive repentinae sive solennes sint, dilationum temporibus non excipiantur, sed his quoque connumerentur. CHAP. VII. Of the Quarta dies post. TOuching the Quarta dies post allowed to the Defendant for his Appearance after the day of Return, it is derived from the ancient Saxon, Salic, French and Germane Laws, where it was ordained, that the Plaintiff should per triduum seu amplius adversarium expectare, usque ad occasum solis (which they called Sol Satire,) as appeareth abundantly in their Laws, and in the Formular of Marculfus, and Bignonius' notes upon the same. To Pag. 531. which also may be added that which occurreth in Gratian Cap. Biduum vel Can. 2. q. 6. triduum. But the original proceedeth from the ancient custom of the Germans mentioned by Tacitus; * Germanor. 480. Illud ex libertate vitium quod non simul nec jussi conveniunt, sed & alter & tertius dies cunctatione coeuntium absumitur. He saith, ex libertate, because that to come at a peremptory time was a note of Servitude, which the Germans despised. It is very observable, that King Edw. III. calling a Great Council in the fifteenth year of his Reign, wherein were assembled divers Bishops and twenty two Earls and Abbots; he appointeth them by his Writ of Summons to meet at London, die Mercurii proxime post festum translationis S. Thomae Martyris proximo futura— vel saltem infra tres dies ex tunc immediate sequentes ad ultimam. The Writ carrieth the form, phrase, and stile of a Parliament-Writ; but in this point of triduum post differeth from all others that I have seen. Hear the Writ itself: Rex Ven. in Christo R. eadem gratia Bathon. & Wellens. Episcopo salutem. Quia super quibusdam arduis & urgentibus negotiis nos & statum regni nostri Angliae contigerit vobiscum & cum aliis Praelat. ac Magnatibus dicti regni die Mercurii proximo post festum Translationis Sancti Thomae Martyris proxime futuri apud London colloquium habere & tractatum: Vobis in fide & dilectione, quibus nobis tenemini, mandamus firmiter injungentes quod quibuscunque actionibus cessantibus, dictis die & loco, vel saltem infra tres dies ex tunc immediate sequent. ad ultimam personaliter intersitis nobiscum, & cum dictis Prelatis & Magnatibus super negotiis praedictis tractaturi, vestrumque Consilium impensuri. Et hoc, sicut nos & honorem nostrum ac jurium & dicti regni nostri commodum diligitis, nullo modo omittatis. Teste Rege apud Turrim London. XII. die Junii. Per ipsum Regem. ¶ Vide plus de Returnis, Ll. H. II. cap. 59 CHAP. VIII. Why I have used so much Canon and Foreign Law in this discourse, with an excursion into the Original of our Law. I Have used much Canon and some other Foreign Law in this discourse, yet, I take it, not impertinently; for as these Western Nations are, for the most part, deduced from the Germans, so in ancient times there was a great 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and affinity in their Laws: — Fancies non omnibus una, Nec diversa tamen, qualem decet esse sororum. They that look into the Laws of our English Saxons, of the Saliques, French, almains, Ripuarians, Bavarians, Longobards, and other Germane Nations, about 800. years since, shall easily find it. Out of them, and other Manners, Rites and Customs of the Saxons and Germans is the first part and foundation of our Laws, commonly called the Laws of Edward the Confessor, and Common Law. Two other principal parts (as from two Pole-Stars) take their direction from the Canon Law and the Law of our brethren the Longobards (descending of Saxon lineage as well as we) called otherwise the Feodal-law, received generally through all Europe. For in matters concerning the Church and Churchmen, Advousons', Patronage, Presentations, Legitimation, Matrimony, Wills, Testaments, Adultery, Defamation, Oaths, Perjury, Days of Law, Days of Vacation, wager of Law, and many other things, it proceeded, sometimes wholly, sometimes for the greater part, by the rules and precepts of the Canon Law. And in matters touching Inheritance, Fees, Tenors by Knights-service, Rents, Services, Wards, Marriage of Wards, Reliefs, Treason, Pleas of the Crown, Escheats, dower of the third part, aids, fines, Felony, Forfeiture, Trial by battle, Essoine, Warranty, etc. from the Feodal Law chiefly; as those that read the books of those Laws collected by Obertus and Gerardus may see apparently. Tho' we and divers other Nations (according as befitteth every one in their particular respects) do in many things vary from them, which Obertus confesseth to be requisite, and to happen often among the Longobards themselves. I do marvel many times, that my Lord Cook, adorning our Law with so many flowers of Antiquity and foreign Learning; hath not (as I suppose) turned aside into this field, from whence so many roots of our Law, have of old been taken and transplanted. I wish some worthy Lawyer would read them diligently, and show the several heads from whence these of ours are taken. They beyond the Seas are not only diligent but very curious in this kind; but we are all for profit and Lucrando pane, taking what we find at Market, without enquiring whence it came. Another great portion of our Common Law is derived from the Civil Law, (unless we will say that the Civil Law is derived from ours.) Dr. Cowel, who hath learnedly traveled in comparing and parallelling of them, affirmeth, that no Law of any Christian Nation whatsoever, approacheth nearer to the Civil Law than this of ours. (His meaning is no Municipal Law.) Yet he saith that all of them generali hujus disciplinae aequitate temperantur, & quasi condiuntur. Had he not said it, his book itself, entitled Institutiones Juris Anglicani ad methodum & seriem Institutionum Imperialium compositae & digestae, would demonstrate it: which Bracton also above 300. years before right well understanding, not only citeth the Digests and Books of Civil Law in many places for warrant of our Common Law, but in handling our Law pursueth the method, phrase, and matter of Justinian's Institutes of Civil Law. When and how these several parts were brought into our Common Law, is neither easily nor definitively to be expressed. Those no doubt of Canon Law, by the prevalency of the Clergy in their several Ages: those of the Feodal by military Princes, at, and shortly after the Conquest. And those of Civil Law, by such of our Reverend Judges and Sages of ancient time, as for Justice and knowledge sake sought instruction thence, when they found no rule at home to guide their judgements by. For I suppose they in those days judged many things, ex aequo & bono, and that their judgements after (as Responsa Prudentium among the Romans, and the Codex Theodosianus) became precedents of Law unto posterity. As for the parts given unto Common Law out of the Constitutions of our Kings since the Conquest, and before Magna Charta; I refer them (as they properly belong) to our Statute Law, tho' our Lawyers do reckon them ordinarily for common Law. Among these various heads of our Law, I deduce none from the Scots; yet must I confess that if those Laws of theirs, which they ascribe to Malcolm the Second, who lived about sixty years before the Conquest, be of that antiquity, (which I cannot but question) and that our book called Glanvil be wholly in effect and verbatim for the greatest part taken out of the book of their Law, called Regiam Majestatem, for they pretend that to be elder than our Glanvil; I must (I say) ingenuously confess, that the greatest part or portion of our Law is come from Scotland, which none I think versed either in story or antiquities will or can admit. To come therefore to the point; if my opinion be any thing▪ I think the foundation of our Law to be laid by our Germane Ancestors, but built upon and polished by materials taken from the Canon Law and Civil Law. And under the capacious name of Germans, I not only intend our Saxons, but the ancient French and Saliques; not excluding from that fraternity the Cimbrian Nations, i. e. the Norwegians, Danes, and Normans. And let it not more mislike us to take our Laws from the noble Germans, a prime and most potent people, than it did the conquering Romans theirs from Greece, or the learned Grecians theirs from the Hebrews. Part of this paragraph seems to be crossed out in the original; but without it the connexion cannot be made good. It is not credible that the Britain's should be the Authors of them; or that their Laws after so many transmutations of people and government, but especially after the expulsion (in a manner) of their Nation, or at least of their Nobility, Gentry and Freemen, the abolishing of their Language, and the cessation of all commerce with them, and an hereditary hostility settled between these Nations; that after all this (I say) they should remain or be taken up by the conquering enemy, who scarcely suffered one Town in a County to be called as they named it, or one British word almost, (that I yet have learned) to creep into their Language. Admit that much of their servile and base people remained behind them, pleased perhaps as well with their new Lords as with their old; can we think that the Saxons should take either Laws or Manners, or form of Government, from these base and servile people? I would not blemish the least feather of the British honour; but I must follow the truth, tho' it rub upon the apple of their eye. What I have said, appeareth not only by Bede, (Lib. 1. cap. 15.) but by their own Historians. Bede having spoken of their most miserable extirpation throughout the whole Land, saith, Itaque nonnulli de miserandis reliquiis ..... And the chiefest monument of British Antiquity, (written in the British tongue, and brought about 500 years since out of Britannia Armorica by Walter archdeacon of Oxenford, and in those days translated into Latin by Monumethensis) doth report that in the days of Cadualladur, the land was so afflicted with discord, sloth, pestilence and famine, that Miserae (Britannorum) reliquiae patriam, factis agminibus, diffugientes, transmarinas petebant regiones, cum ululatu magno sub velorum funibus hoc modo cantantes; Dedisti nos tanquam oves escarum, in gentibus dispersisti nos, etc. Ps. 43. 13. And Cadualladur himself there complaineth fleeing into Armorica, whence he never returned, Incumbit [divinae] illius ergo potestatis ultio, quae nos ex natali solo extirpate; quos nec olim Romani, nec deinde Scotti, vel Picti, nec versutae proditiones exterminare quiverunt. And the Author going on, showeth, that the Land was so universally destitute of British Inhabitants, that the Saxons (which were already seated here) informed their Countrymen beyond Seas of these desolate Territories, inviting them to come and possess them. Quod cum ipsis indicatum fuisset (saith the Author) nefandus populus ille, collecta innumerabili multitudine virorum & mulierum, applicuit in partibus Northanhumbriae, & desolatas Provincias ab Albania (i e. Scotia) usque ad Cornubiam (Cornwall) inhabitavit. Non enim aderat habitator qui prohiberet, praeter pauperculas Britonum reliquias quae superfuerant, quae infra abdita nemorum in Gualiis commanebant. Ab illo tempore, potestas Britonum in Insula cessavit, & Angli regnare coeperunt * Here is this note in the margin of the Original: that the Saxons, abjectio dominio Britonum, jam 〈…〉 Ca C●eperunt. Their History of Cambria (written also in their own Welsh language, about 250. years since, and translated into English by their Countryman and greatest Antiquary Humf. Lhoyd) doth acknowledge, that after Cadwallader's departure, there remained none of his Nation, but certain poor Britain's that lived by roots in rocks and woods. And that the Saxons, Angles, and Juthes (that is to say, Goths) being then called in by such of their Countrymen that were there before, did come in great numbers; and dividing this Land into divers Territories and Kingdoms, did inhabit all the Cities, Towns, Castles, and Villages, which the Britain's had builded, rules, and inhabited, by the space of 1827. years. Let the Reader now judge, whether it be likely, that the scrupulous Nation of the Saxons either did, or could by any probable means take any Laws from the poor relics of the Britain's. * In the original this paragraph seems to be crossed out; for what reason I know not. When the Romans conquered this Land, they neither removed the Inhabitants nor brought any Foreigners upon them, other than (to govern and keep them in obedience) some Legions of Soldiers and small Colonies. Yet that they made an alteration of their Laws, we may see in the Scripture by the example of Judaea. For tho' Pompey obtained the Kingdom there, rather by the confederacy with Hyrcanus, than by right of Conquest, (and therefore suffered them to enjoy their rites of Religion, with the liberties of most of their Cities;) yet it being reduced into a Province (as this of ours was) their laws were so changed, as by their own confession, John 18. 31. It was not lawful for them to put any man to death. Therefore our Saviour and the two Thiefs were judged, and suffered upon the cross after the Roman manner, not according to the laws of the Jews, (for their law never inflicted the cross upon any offender) and the punishment of blasphemy wherewith they charged Christ, was stoning; (In which course, they once in a fury were about to put him to death, Joh. 10. 31.) and the punishment of Theft a Quadruple Restitution, or bondage in default thereof. As for the stoning of Stephen, it was not judicial but tumultuous, an act of fury, and against Law: In which course they meant also to have murdered St. Paul, had not Lysias prevented them, by sending him to his legal trial, Caesar's judgement Seat. Wherein it is further to be observed, that even then, offences committed about the very judicial Law, and Religion itself, was also under the cognizance of the Roman Judge. For even that self same cause, wherein Paul stood accused before Festus (as Festus himself reporteth it) Acts 25. 19 [was] Touching questions of their own Religion. By this, we may conceive, how the Romans dealt with the Britain's touching their Laws; and the story of St. Alhan and St. Amphibalus somewhat showeth it. Where, according to the Roman manner, St. Alban was convened before the Roman Judge by Soldiers not by civil Officers, and before his Execution whipped (as Pilate used our Saviour) and then delivered to the Soldiers to be beheaded. Bed. Lib. 1. ca 7. 1 Our Author has left us another account, How far the Britain's and Saxons made use of the Roman Laws; which we find in the printed Copy. It is also in the Original MS. tho' crossed out, and that which we have printed put in its place. But notwithstanding it appears that he designed this, as his last thoughts, for the text; yet the other is of more moment than to be omitted. It is thus, By this, we may conceive how the Romans dealt with the Britain's touching their Laws, and the story of St. Alban and Amphibalus somewhat showeth it. But more plainly Seneca speaking of Claudius the Emperor having conquered this Island: — Jussit & ipsum Nova Romanae Jura securis Tremere Oceanum: In Ocean Isle new Laws he set; That from the Roman Axe were set. And more plainly yet Herodianus (in Severo, p. 250.) speaking of Severus the Emperor's going out of this Island: He left (saith he) behind him, in the part of the Island subject to the Romans, his youngest son Geta, to administer Law and the Civil affairs thereof; and some of his ancient friends to be his Counsellors; taking his eldest son Antoninus for his wars against the Barbarians. In averment of all this, it appeareth by Tacitus (Annal. Lib. 14. p. 231.) and Dion Cassius (〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉) that the Romans here had in every Colony their Curiam for justice, and their Cruces and Patibula for execution. In the Colony of Camalodunum, saith Tacitus, was heard sremitus in Curia and Suetonius overcoming them, put them to patibula, ignes, cruces, Ibid. So that all concurreth to the verifying of the old verse: Cernitis ignotos Latia sub Lege Britannos. But what Laws soever the Romans made in Britain, the Saxons doubtless swept them all away with the Britain's. There is this certain proof of it: Antoninus made a Constitution, That all Nations under the Roman Empire should be called Romans; and when the Northern people broke into th' se lower parts of Europe, and made their habitation there, the old Inhabitants (whom they expelled not but lived mingled with) were still called Romans; as we see in the ancient Laws of the Saliques, Burgundians, in Cass odorus and others; and their Laws distinguished by the title of Lex Barbara and Lex Romana. But here in Britain, after the Saxons had conquered, we never heard nor find, any mention of Lex Romana, or of any Roman Inhabitant: Which showeth that both it and the Laws of the Britain's were expelled and driven away together; or, that of the Romans with the Romans, and that of the Britan's with the Britan's. But what Laws soever the Romans used in Britain; the Saxons doubtless swept them all away with the British Nation. Otherwise than that in composing Laws for the government of their people, after they had received Christianity from the Roman Clergy, they might perhaps (by their advice) take somewhat also from the Roman Law. Which Beda seemeth to avouch, Lib. 2. ca 5. speaking of the acts of Ethelbert the first Christian Saxon King: Qui inter caetera bona quae genti suae conferebat; etiam decreta illi judiciorum, juxta exempla Romanorum, cum consilio sapientum constituit. What Beda meant by the words Juxta exempla Romanorum, is not perspicuous. As, whether his meaning was, that he made positive Decrees, as the Romans had done, for the government of his people? or, that in making his Decrees, he took the sum and manner of them from the Romans? This doubt we shall easily resolve, by that which followeth in Bede himself: Quae (decreta) conscripta Anglorum sermone, hactenus habentur & observantur ab ea. In quibus primitus posuit, qualiter id emendare deberet, qui aliquid rerum vel Ecclesiae, vel Episcopi, vel reliquorum ordinum furto auferret, volens scil. tuitionem eyes, quos & quorum doctrinam susceperat, praestare. And to say truth, this that Bede here doth mention touching the protection of the Clergy, is the chiefest matter in them that he taketh from the Romans, as namely, from their Canons not from their Civil Law. For the secular part of those his Decrees differ far from those of the Romans, as by the Saxon copy of them (which I myself have to show) appeareth plainly. But to conclude this point; whatsoever in them savoureth of the Roman law, be it Canon or Civil, it doubtless was inserted by his Roman Clergy, being then a principal part of the King's Council, (as the Clergy was afterward in all ages.) And of them chiefly, I suppose that to be meant which Bede mentioneth, Cum consilio sapientum constituit. We find among the Saxons, the example and the reason, why our common Law was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an unwritten Law. They were originally a Grecian Colony coming out of Lacedaemon and the Territory of Sparta. Where Lycurgus being sometime King and Author of their Law, among other of his Decrees he named 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, ordained this for one, That their Laws should not be written, because he would have every man to fix them in his memory: and for that purpose, made them short and summary, after the manner of our maxims. This course, the Saxons, and by their example the other Germane Nations held for many ages. The first of the Northern Nations that altered it, were the Goths; who in the Aera 504. i. e. the year of Christ 466. under Euricus their King, set their Laws in writing: Legum instituta scriptis habere caeperunt * The Author's name is so obscurely writ, that I cannot ●●ad it. ..... The Burgundians and Saliques a little before; but the Saxons themselves, and the Angli, Werini and Frisii are not noted to have written Law, till the time of Herald the Dane, about the year 994. So that our Saxons here in Britain began to write some of their Laws before their brethren of Germany. For tho' they reduced not the general manners and customs of their Country, whereby they lived and were governed, into a written Volume, but left them still, as Lycurgus his Rhetras, to common memory and tradition; yet many of their ancient Kings after they had received Christianity, put their own Constitutions into writing. So did the most ancient of them, Aethelbert King of Kent about the year 680. if his Laws (whereof I have a MS. copy) were in his own days put in writing. So did Inas King of the Westsaxons. What the Laws of the Britain's were, remains at this day to be seen by a model of them in an ancient Manuscript under the Title of The Laws of Hoel Dha, (that is, Hoel the good;) nothing consonant to these of ours at this day, or those of the Saxons in time past. But we find by the Red Book in the Exchequer, that the Laws of Hen. I. did so concur in many things with them of the other Nations we spoke of, that sometimes he not only citeth the Salic Law, and the Ribuarian or Belgic Law by name, but deduceth much of the Text verbatim from them. And we find also a great multitude of words of Art, names of Offices, Officers and Ministers in our Law, common in old time to the Germans, French, Saliques, Longobards, and other Nations, as well as to our Saxons, Danes, and Normans; but not one to my knowledge that riseth from the British tongue, nor do we retain any Law, Rite or Custom of the ancient Britain's, which we received not from the Saxons or Germans, as used also by them of old, before they came into Britain. For these few Greek words that are found in our Law, Chirographer and Protonotary, (whereby some argue the antiquity of our Law to be from the Druids, whom Caesar and Pliny report to have used the Greek tongue;) it is doubtless, that they are come to us from the Civil Lawyers, and the one of them being a Mongrel, half Greek and half Latin, could not descend from the Druids, who had neither knowledge nor use of the Latin tongue. They therefore that fetch our Laws from Brutus, Mulmutius, the Druids, or any other Brutish or British Inhabitants here of old, affirming that in all the times of these several Nations, (viz. Britain's, Romans, Saxons, Danes and Normans) and of their Kings, this Realm was still ruled with the self same customs that it is now (viz. in the time of King Henry VI) governed withal; do like them that make the Arcadians to be elder than the Moon, and the God Terminus to be so fixed on the Capitoline-hill, as neither Mattocks nor Spades, nor all the power of men nor of the other Gods, could remove him from the place he stood in. And thus I end. APPENDIX. Pat. 11. Hen. III. m. 13. REX universis Patentes literas inspecturis salutem. Cum Venerabilis Pater S. Cant. Episcopus, auctoritate Domini Papae & fratrum suorum, nobis gratiam de juramentis praestandis coram Justiciariis nostris de Praecept. nostro Itiner. ab instanti Adventu Domini usque ad Vigiliam Sancti Thomae Apostoli, & a principio Quadragesimae usque ad Dominicam qua cantatur Isti sunt dies; duntaxat in rebus subscriptis; viz. in Assizis ultimae praesentationis de morte Antecessor. novae diss. de magna Assiza, & de Inquisitionibus quae de terra emergerint coram eisdem Justiciariis nostris vel per judicium vel de consensu pertinent: Ita quod haec concessio hoc anno tantum durabit usque ad diem Dominicam supradictam: Nos per literas nostras patentes quas eidem Domino Archiepiscopo fieri fecimus, protestati sumus quod concessio illa nobis ad praesens facta usque ad diem Dominicam supradictam, non trahetur in consequentiam post eundem diem. Cum igitur supplicaverimus Ven. Patri IV. Archiepiscopo Eboracensi de consimili gratia nobis concedenda de Juramentis praestandis per totam Provinciam suam usque ad Terminum praedictum: Nos per has literas nostras Patentes protestamur, quod dictus Archiepiscopus Ebor. per totam Proviciam suam id de Juramentis praestandis (sicut praedictum est) nobis duxerit concedendum, concessio ista ad praesens facta usque ad terminum praedictum non trahetur in consequentiam post diem eundem. In cujus rei testimonium eidem Domino Archiepiscopo Ebor. dedi has literas nostras Patentes sigillo nostro signatas. Teste meipso apud Westmonast. 11. Nou. Anno regni nostri undecimo. Claus. 11. H. III. m. 26. Rex dilectis & fidelibus suis Stephano de Segrave & Roberto de Lexinton, & sociis suis Justic. Itinerantibus in Com. Warw. Leic. Glouc. & Wigorn. Salutem. Sciatis quod Venerabilis Pater S. Cant. Archiep. auctoritate Domini Papae, concessi quod juramenta praestentur coram Justiciariis nostris Itinerant. ab instanti adventu corum usque Vigiliam Sancti Thomae Apostoli, & à principio Quadragesimae usque ad diem Dominicam qua cantatur Isti sunt dies, viz. in Ass. ultimae praesentationis de morte Antecessor. de magna Ass. & de Inquisitionibus quae emergerint de terris, sicut plenius nobis constitit ex inspectione literarum Domini Cant. quas inde vobis mittimus. Rogamus ut V. P. W. Ebor. Archiepiscopus quatenus concedens juramenta in consimilibus causis praestari infra Provinciam suam usque ad Praesat. Terminum, literas suas patentes consimiles literas Domini Cant. inde habere faciat. Vt autem liberius & facilius hoc volet facere, misimus literas nostras patentes, quales fieri fecimus Domino Cant. protestants quod post terminum praefatum concessio praedicta ab eo nobis facta non poterit trahi in observantiam. Vobis igitur mandamus, quod cum Archiepiscopus Ebor. hoc nobis concesserit, & literas suas patentes nobis habere fecerit, Iter Justic. nostr. in Comitat qui ..... sunt jurisdictioni praedicti Archiepiscopi Ebor. & aliis Comitat. subsint jurisdictioni Archiepiscopi Cantuar. usque ad praefatum terminum, si opus fuerit, continuetis solita prudentia & solitudine. Quod non dubitamus vos esse facturos negotiis nostris expediendis ad commodum & honorem nostrum intendent. Dat. apud Westm. 3. die Nou. In custodia Franc. Bacon de Graies-Inn Armig. 1. Febr. An. 1633. Discreto Viro Domino Tho. Weyland Illustr. Reg. Angl. Justic. * Rogerus de Skerwing. R. miseratione divina Norwic. Episcopus salutem & honoris augmentum. Cordis nobis est ut omni tempore Justitia debitum & celerem sortiatur effectum. Hinc est quod cum Ass. ultimae praesentationis super Ecclesiam de Kirkby omnium Sanctorum inter Imann. quae fuit uxor Ric. de Thwait querentem, & Ricardum lc Cam defendentem, coram vobis sit arannata, ut intelliximus, Vobis auctoritate praesentium permittimus quod non obstante instanti Quadragesima Assisam praedictam inter partes praedictas etiamsi juramentum interveniat licite capiatis: Valete. Dat. apud Buketon 11. Kal. Martii, ●o. Henr. III. Anno Domini M. CC. LXXVI. FINIS. A SHORT APOLOGY For Archbishop ABBOT, Touching The death of PETER HAWKINS. By an unknown Hand. WITH A LARGE ANSWER To this APOLOGY, By Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. As also, Several Letters relating to the same Fact: With a Copy of The Dispensation for Irregularity, Granted to the Archbishop. And a Treatise Of the Original of TESTAMENTS and WILLS, And of their PROBATES, And to whom it anciently belonged. By the said Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. AN APOLOGY For Archbishop ABBOT, Touching The death of PETER HAWKINS the Keeper, Wounded in the Park at Bramsil, July 24. 1621. 1. IT is certain that in foro conscientiae, this case may not only deservedly produce a fear and trembling in him who was the accidental cause thereof; but may justly make the tallest Cedar in Lebanon to shake, in recounting with his inward man, what sin it is that hath provoked God to permit such a rare and unusual action to fall out by his hand: which maketh him, for the time, to be Fabula vulgi, and giveth opportunity to the enemies of Religion of all kinds, to rejoice, to speak their pleasure, to fill their Books and Libels, within the Realm, and perhaps, beyond the Seas. And that, concerning his Calling as well as his Person, not only for the present, but also in future ages; beside Grief to his friends, and some Scandal to the weak, who do not rightly apprehend things, but raise questions which few men can resolve. To all which may be added, the interpretation of it by his Majesty, graciously or otherwise; and the forfeiture, that in rigorous construction of Law may be put upon him, although held for no great Delinquent; besides the providing for a Widow and four Fatherless children. All which may pierce a heart that is not senseless; and day and night yield him matter enough of troubled meditations. 2. And yet, lest he that intended no ill (much less to that person, a poor man and a stranger to him) should be swallowed up with sorrow; he is not devoid of some comfort, as that Consensus facit peccatum, and Voluntas facit reatum; and where those concur not, misdemeanours are properly contra nullum Decalogi praeceptum. And that when God, speaking of such casual death (Exod. 21. 13.) useth these words, If a man lie not in wait, but God deliver him (the slain man) into his hands; Divines collect thereupon, that it is not humanum but à Deo, which no man's Providence can absolutely prevent. For what God will have done, shall be; and no Creature may dare to set him to school in what manner, or by what person he will have it performed. And Deuteronom. 19 6, 10. God putting the case of the man slain by the iron of his Neighbour's axe slipping off, appointeth Cities of Refuge, lest he should be slain also; who (as he saith) was not worthy of death: and again, that innoxius sanguis, innocent blood be not shed in the Land. Where we may collect, that such cases are foreseen and ordered by God himself; and that no Calling, no not that of the Priest, is free from that which God will have accomplished; since he must communem hominum subire sortem. Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto. And, Quod cutque contingere potest, cuivis potest; although of all others, the Priest should be most wary, what he attempt and how. 3. There is no Text in the Old Testament which directly distinguisheth the Priest from other men, in case of Blood; but there are examples (which may not be apply d to Evil, for that were to pervert them) resolving one scruple which is made. As Moses was no Priest, yet he gave down the Law; and he consecrated Aaron the Highpriest, notwithstanding the time was that he had kill d the Egyptian. The Levites slew 3000. of the Israelites, after the Idolatry with the golden Calf. Phineas, who was afterwards the Highpriest, slew the Israelitish man with the Midianitish woman, and was blessed by God for it. Samuel hewed Agag to pieces. Jehoiada the Priest commanded Athal●ah the Usurper to be slain. The Maccabees fought for their Country; and so took away the lives of many a man. Paul was consenting to the death of Stephen. Peter, (although rebuked for it) cut off the ear of Malchus. Josephus the Jew, of the seed of the Priests, was Captain over Judah, and fought divers times. Out of all which, I do only make this collection; That the Priest s restraint from blood, is not ex jure divino, but ex jure positivo; Pontificio soil. vel Canoni●o, or Ecclesiastico, as we call it; out of caution, for purity, and decency, and good congruity for so holy a Calling, which cometh so near God, and attendeth at his Altar. 4. See then in the Ecclesiastical Law, what Grace is afforded to him, who against his will, hath casually been the death of another. There is in the Decretals, a title De homicidio voluntario vel casuali: concerning the latter of which, there be many 1 〈…〉 1695. ●app. 9 13. 14. 15. 23. Rescripts; which demonstrateth, that in human life such things do frequently fall out. In these, there are five Chapters, Cap. Lator: Cap. Dilectis siliis: Cap. Ex Litteris: Cap. Ex Litteris tuae: Cap. Joannes: Where the Rubric is, Homicidium casuale non imputatur ei qui non fuit in culpa: and Homicidium casuale non imputatur ei qui dedit operam rei licitae, nee fuit in culpa. And there the Decision is evermore, that there is no Irregularity in promovendo, or in promoto ad sacros ordines. This is the more to be noted, because it is not the 2 Ad ca Lator. Interpreters, but the body of the Law. And the Gloss thereupon hath; Nota, quod homicidium casu commissions, culpa non praecedente non est imputandum. And, 3 Ad cap. Johannes. Sibi imputari non debet, quia fortuitos casus, qui praevideri non possunt, non praevidit. And, De casu fortuito nullus tenetur, cum praevideri non possit. And upon this the stream of the Canonists do run, as by a multitude of Books may be showed: with whom our 4 Lib. 3. Tr. ● 〈◊〉 17. Bracton, a great Civilian and Common Lawyer too; Homicidium casuale non imputatur. 5. The two heads whereto the Law looketh, freeing a man from blame, and expressly from Irregularity, are; that the person by whom the Action is perform d, do not dare operam rei illicitae, and that he use diligence of his part that no hurt be committed. 5 L. 5. ca ●. ●a. 332. Azorius the Jesuit saith, Irregularitas, cum ob delictum constituitur, non nisi ex lethali peccato contrahitur: nisi ex homicidio fiat quis irregularis, eo quod det operam rei vetitae & interdictae; nam tunc quamvis homicidium casu sequatur, ob culpam nostram levem vel levissimam, multorum est opinio irregularitatem contrahi. 6 E● Burch. L. 6. ca 22. And Ivo in his Canons, some hundreds of years before him; Si duo fratres in sylva arbores succiderint, & appropinquante casura unius arboris, frater fratri dixerit Cave, & ille fugiens, in pressuram arboris inciderit, ac mortuus fuerit, vivens frater innocens de sanguine germani dijudicatur. Now, the ca●e at Bramsil, is within the compass of these two conditions. For the party agent, was about no unlawful work: for what he did, was in the day, in the presence of forty or fifty persons, the Lord Zouch, who was owner of the Park, not only standing by, but inviting to Hunt and Shoot; and all persons in the Field were called upon to stand far off, partly for avoiding harm, and partly lest they should disturb the Game; and all in the Field performed what was desired. And this course did the Lord Archbishop use to take, when or wheresoever he did shoot; as all persons at any time present can witness: never any man being more solicitous thereof, than he evermore was. And the morning when the deed was done, the Keeper was twice warned to stay behind, and not to run forward; but he carelessly did otherwise, when he that shot could take no notice of his galloping in before the Bow; as may be seen by the Verdict of the Coroner's Inquest. 6. This case at Bramsill is so favourable; that the strictest Writers of these times, directly conclude, that if a Clergyman committing casuale homicidium be about a forbidden and interdicted act, yet he is not irregular, if the interdicted act be not therefore forbidden, because it may draw on Homicide. And thereupon, inasmuch as Hunting is forbidden in a Clergyman, not in respect of danger of Life, but for Decency, that he should not spend his time in Exercises which may hinder him from the study fit for his Calling, or for other such reasons; Irregularity followeth not thereupon. And to this purpose, writeth at large 1 L. 5. quaest. 1. ca 9 Soto, Covarruvias, and Suarez, who are great Canonists and Schoolmen. And if this be true, (as out of great reason it may be so held) how much further is the present case in question from Irregularity. 7. But some go directly to the point, and say, that the Lord Archbishop did navare operam rei illicitae, because he was on Hunting; for that was interdicted to a Bishop by the Canon De Clerico Venatore; and so by a consequent he must needs be Irregular. To which objection, see how many clear and true answers there be. As first, that the Canon being taken out of the Decrees, is by Gratian himself branded to be Palea, no better than Chaff. Secondly, it is cited out of the fourth Council of Orleans; and there is no such thing to be found, as the Gloss well observeth. Thirdly, it forbiddeth Hunting cum canibus aut accipitribus; and none of these were at Bramsil. And if you will enforce it by comparison or proportion, the rule of the Law is, Favores sunt ampliandi, odia restringenda: Where mark, when Hunting with Dogs or Hawks is forbidden, it is not for fear of Slaughter, for there is no such danger in either of them. Fourthly, the Canon forbiddeth Hunting voluptatis causa, but not recreationis or valetudinis gratia, which the Books say is permitted etiam Episcopo. Fifthly, the Canon hath, Si saepius detentus fuerit, if he make a Life or Occupation of it; which the world knoweth, is not the Archbishop's case, but a little one time in the year, directed so by his Physician, to avoid two diseases, whereunto he is subject, the Stone and the Gout. Sixthly, it is clamosa venatio against which the Canon speaketh, not quieta or modesta, which the Canonists allow; and this whereof the question ariseth, was most silent and quiet; saving that this accident, by the Keeper's unadvised running in, hath afterwards made a noise over all the Country. 8. These Exceptions, as they naturally and without any enforcing, give answer to this Objection of the Canon; so there is another thing that may stop the mouth of all Gain-sayers; if any Reason will content them. And that is, that by the Stat. of Henr. VIII. 35. ca 16. no Canon is in force in England, which was not in use before that time, or is not contrary or derogatory to the Laws or Statutes of this Realm, nor to the Prerogatives of the Royal Crown: of which nature this is. For in Charta de Foresta, Archbishops and Bishops by name have liberty to Hunt: and 13. Ric. II. cap. 13. a Clergyman who hath 10l. by the year, may keep greyhouds to hunt. And Linwood, who lived soon after that time, and understood the Ecclesiastical Constitutions and the Laws of England very well, in treating of Hunting, speaketh against Clergymen using that exercise unlawfully; as in places restrained or forbidden; but hath not one word against Hunting simply. And the Archbishop of Canterbury had formerly more than twenty Parks and Chases of his own, to use at his pleasure; and now by Charter hath free-warren in all his lands. And by ancient Record, the Bishop of Rochester, at his death, was to render to the Archbishop of Canterbury his Kennel of Hounds as a mortuary, whereof (as I am credibly informed) the Law taketh notice for the King Sede vacant, under the name of Muta canum and Mulctura. To this may be added, the perpetuated use of Hunting by Bishops in their Parks, continued to this day without scruple or question. As that most Reverend man the Lord Archbishop Whitgyfte used in Hartlebury-park while he lived at Worcester; in Ford-park in Kent; in the Park of the Lord Cobham, near Canterbury; where, by the favour of that Lord, he killed twenty Bucks in one journey; using Hounds, Greyhounds, or his Bow, at his pleasure, although he never Shot well. And the same is credibly reported of the Lord Archbishop Sands. And it is most true, that the Deans and Chapter of Winchester use it as they please in their Franchise. To say nothing of Dr. Rennal, whose Hounds were long famous throughout all England; and yet he was by profession a Canonist; and knew well what induced Irregularity. I will add two things more, which directly appertain to the Archbishop of Canterbury. The one is, the famous Record, That at the Coronation of Queen Eleanor, wife to Henr. III. the Earl of Arundel (who was by his place Cupbearer for that day) was enforced to serve by a Deputy, because he was Excommunicated by the Archbishop, for taking up his Hounds coming into the Earl's grounds to Hunt; where the Archbishop pleaded and alleged that it was lawful for him to Hunt within any Forest of England, whensoever he would. The other, is that which is written of Archbishop Cranmer, in his life; where I will cite the very words: Permiserat ei pater aucupium, venationem, equitationem, etc. Quibus quidem, cum jam Archiepiscopus relaxare animum & abducere se à rebus gravioribus vellet, ita utebatur, ut in famulatu suo non fuerit quisquam qui in generosum equum salire ac tractare elegantius, aut aves ferasque aucupio aut venatione insequi commodius intelligentiusque potuisset: Saepe etiam, etsi oculis infirmis esset, arcum tendens, sagitta percussit seram. Out of all which, and many more Records and Cases that are to be showed, the Conclusion is clear, That howsoever the Canon may touch Bishops and Clergymen beyond the Seas, it meddleth not with the Bishops of England, who by favour of Princes and the State have Baronies annexed to their Sees. So that it doth arise out of true collection from these Heads, that there is no danger of Irregularity in the Lord Archbishop's case, either toward himself or other men. His Majesty's Princely Grace giveth an end to all; and this he most humbly craveth. For other things, God being appeased (as he hopeth that he is) he dreadeth not the tongue or pen of any enemy: among whom, the Popes and Cardinals have wilfully committed many poison, murders, and outrageous acts; and yet they must believe that they are the head and chiefest members of the Church. AN ANSWER TO THE Foregoing Apology for Archbishop Abbot; By Sir HENRY SPELMAN Kt. TOuching the First, Second, and Third Sections: It may be that the Priests in the old Law (whose Ministry was altogether in blood) were not prohibited but that upon just occasion they might shed even the blood of man as well as of beasts; and put on an Armour as well as an Ephod. For the Tabernacle was covered with red Skins, to signify cruentum Seculum, cruentum Ministerium: and Moses (whose hands were dipped in blood) was not forbidden to be the chief Founder thereof. But when the Temple came to be built (which was the image of the Church of Christ) than the hands of David, tho' they had fought the battles of God, yet because they were seasoned with blood, they might not lay one stone in that Foundation. Therefore, when the old Law and this bloody Priesthood were grown to an end, and going out of the world, and that the Priests of the Gospel were entering in their room into the world; our Saviour commanded Peter to put up his sword; for now, Arma horrentia Martis rejicienda; and stola candida induenda fuit. Tho' then some Priests in the old Law and many thousand Levites were Martial-men, yet for many hundred years in the time of the Gospel, I read not of any: insomuch, that the succeeding ages desiring a Martial Saint, were driven to suppose St. George. Whether therefore these Laws of the Church, which at this day prohibit Clergymen to meddle with matters of blood, be merely ex jure positivo, or ex divino mixto, I leave it to the determination of the Reverend Divines. 4. Concerning the Cases alleged out of the Decretals: it is true that the Rubric is, Homicidium casuale non imputatur ei qui non fuit in culpa; and Homicidium casuale non imputatur ei qui dedit operam rei licitae, nec fuit in culpa. And so likewise, is that alleged out of the Gloss thereupon, and out of Bracton. But let us parallel the case in these with them, which are as followeth. A. and P. two Clerks Sporting together, A. by chance threw P. down, who having a knife by his side, the same happened to wound A. that he died. Pope Alexander III. commanded the Bishop of Exeter in this case to admit P. to holy Orders; for Sporting was lawful. A sickly Chaplain being gotten upon an unruly Horse, and he checking him with Bridle and Spur to stay him, the Horse broke his Bridle, cast his Master, and running over a Woman coming by, killed a Child in her arms. This Chaplain was admitted to holy Orders, for that neither in Will nor Act he committed Homicide, but also did a lawful Act. One being to unlade a Cart of Hay, looked round about to see if any were near, and seeing none, threw a stack off the Cart, and having unladed it, a Boy was after found dead with a little stripe in his face. This Priest after Canonical purgation was admitted to his place. A Monk helping to take a Bell down out of a Steeple, casually thrust down a piece of timber, which bruised a Boy to death. The Monk is judged not uncapable of further Ecclesiastical Preferment, for that the business was necessary, and the place not for ordinary resort. A Priest tolling a Bell to Prayers, the same fell and killed a Boy. The Bishop is commanded to suffer the Priest to execute his Function, for Nihil potuit imputari, si casus omnes fortuitos non praevidit. Tho' there be many points in all these cases (and more in some than others▪ to excuse the Parties agent; yet will I meddle only with those two which are most eminent, and offer d by the Apologist; that is, Animus or Intentio innocua, and Actio legitima. Touching the Intent, none is so impious as to imagine that his Lordship intended to hurt any man: yet is there this difference between his intent and theirs in the cases alleged: they intended to hurt neither Man nor Beast, he, though not to hurt a Man, yet to kill a Beast: they, nihil saevum aut non legitimum: he, legitimum quiddam sed tamen saevum. For there is a kind of cruelty in the slaughter of every thing; and therefore in the old Law (Leu. 17. 13.) He that taketh any beast or fowl by hunting that may be eaten; shall pour out the blood thereof, and cover it with dust; that the cruelty appear not, as ● take it. And in our Law, those that were exercised in slaughter of Beasts, were not received to be tryers of the life of a Man. Much is to be said out of Histories to this purpose. But to come to the point whereon all dependeth, Whether the Action his Lordship was now about, be lawful or not? The places of Azorius and Ivo are truly cited; and I doubt them not to be Law: that is, to this effect, That it worketh no Irregularity, where, in a lawful action a Clerk killeth a Man casually, having first used all diligence to prevent it. And it appeareth that his Lordship did this so carefully, that all were continually called upon, not only to stand off, but so far off as showeth his Lordship to be very unskilful in the use of his Bow; and may therefore touch him in Discretion for meddling with so dangerous an Engine in so great an Assembly; and consequently produce Irregularity even by the words of Azorius alleged to excuse him, tho' the action be lawful: nam tunc quamvis homicidium casu sequatur, ob culpam nostram levem vel levissimam, multorum est opinio Irregularitatem contrahi. But not to fall from the tree by reaching at a twig; we will rest upon the chief Station in the case, the Nature of the Action; which tho' it be forbidden, yet according to Soto, Covarruvias and Suarez (as it is alleged) induceth not Irregularity when Homicide follows thereon, if it be not therefore forbidden, because it may draw on Homicide: concluding, that tho' Hunting be forbidden to a Clergyman, yet for that it is not forbidden in respect of danger of Life, but for Decency, etc. Irregularity followeth not thereupon. As for Covarruvias and Suarez, I have them not; but Soto is not happily alleged. For tho' he incline to that opinion (with Cajetan) yet he taketh a a distinction that woundeth the Case in question; and that is, Venatione, quae armis & telis fit, profecto siet Clericus irregularis: and this falleth out to be now the Case. For this Hunting was performed with a Cross-bow, a deadly and a dangerous weapon, that hath been the occasion of many bloody misfortunes. But in a former passage, Soto also saith, that Cajetan and Sylvester and Doctores ●uris Canonici universalem regulam astruunt, quod omnis qui dat operam rei illi●itae, quandocunque ex illa datione sequatur homicidium, fiat irregularis. And Azpilcu●ta Navarrus saith, that Cajetan in the other place (and by consequence Sotus) is to be understood with a limitation, as meaning Venationem passerum & perdi●um ad aucupis cantum, vel accipitris, sine armis in provinciis— non venationem ursorum, aprorum, & cervorum, quae armis exercetur. Enchirid. cap. 27. Sect. 237. Wherein, the distinction he taketh, making a main difference between Venationem ludi●ram and Venationem Martiam, concludeth plainly, the Case in hand to have wrought Irregularity. And the Apologist finding no sure ground in this Assertion, buildeth no otherwise upon it, than if it be true as out of great reason (he saith) it may be so held: and passeth from it to his chiefest place of refuge, showing that the Canon that makes Hunting to be actio illicita doth no way touch his Lordship. First, for that upon the matter there is no such Canon: insomuch as Gratian himself (that collected the Canons) brandeth this to be Palea and no better than Chaff. It is true, he brandeth it with the term Palea, and was a worthy Man; but noted generally to have mistaken many things, and some extremely. But if that be the meaning of the word, his error seemeth very perspicuous, as finding this Canon ascribed to the Council of Orleans and not finding it there, he presently branded it, Palea. But the Canonists have many other opinions of it, as to signify 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 antiqua; or of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rursum. John Andrea, Imota, Alexandrinus and Jason, famous Professors, think this title to be put over the heads of many Canons, to signify they were added by Protopalea a Cardinal, since Gratian's time. And experience excludeth the first interpretation of the word, for that the Canons so entitled are very many, and not rejected as spurii or palea. Besides, Burchard Bishop of Worms, who lived long before Gratian, hath this very Canon in his second Book, cap. 213. and there ascribed (as it ought) to the Council of Meldis; as also by Ivo, part. 6. ca 288. If then it be any where in the Councils, it sufficeth; tho' the Collector mistook the place, which is easily done: as even the Evangelist Matthew (ca 27. 9) citeth a place out of the Prophet Jeremy, which is not found there, but in Zachariah. It is apparent also that many Copies of Councils are unperfect, and want some of the true Canons, as neglected or not finished by the Notary. But if need be, this Canon hath further warrant, even from the times almost of the primitive Church. For in Concil. Agathensi, of 35. Bishops in An. 435. ca 55. it is said, Sacerdotes & Levitae canibus ad venandum & accipitribus non utantur. And in Concil. Epaunensi, of 70. Bishops, in An. 492. 1 So Carol. M. in Decreto suo. Furnonens. Synod. Can. 8. Cabilonens. Can. 9 Cent. 9 Col. 302. l. 30. Vt Episcopi venatores non sint, nec accipitres alant. The Capitularies also of Ludovicus Imp. taking notice of it, about the year 820. prohibiteth Priests, ut Venationes ferarum vel avium minime sectentur. Addit. 3. ca 43. So that we have no reason to account this Canon either supposititium or paleam; but rather to be (as it is indeed) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 antiquum or ex antiquis. According to which sense, the Canons of like nature in the Laws of the Wisigoths or Western-Goths are in every passage entitled by the very Latin word (not the Greek) Antiqua. And Justinian himself seemeth to have had this Distinction in his eye, when he called his later Constitutions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, i. e. Novellas, that so they might be marked from those of old, which Cedrinus in Justinian's life calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, Leges antiquas. His second Objection is, That it is cited out of the fourth Council of Orleans, and it is not there. This we have already answered, and showed where it is. Thirdly, he saith it forbiddeth Hunting cum canibus & accipitribus, and none of these were there. It is strange, a Keeper should go about to strike a Deer, and not have his Lyme-hound to draw after him. But the Canon goeth further, Canes ad venandum, aut Accipitres, aut hujusmodi res habere non licet. Where hujusmodi res seemeth to contain all instruments used in Hunting. Fourthly, voluptatis causa; not recreationis or valetudinis, which the Books say is permitted etiam Episcopo. What his Books say, I know not; but my Book saith thus: Dic breviter, quod venari causa voluptatis est mortale peccatum, & in laico; sed venari causa necessitatis vel indigentiae corporis non est mortale peccatum; in Clerico tamen potius prohibetur. But he adjoineth, In venatione, potius delectatio quam actus attenditur. Atho. in Othob. fol. 114. b. Neither is there here any mention of Recreatio, unless Delectatio and it be all one (as commonly we use it) and then forbidden. Besides, what action or recreation belonging to health is there, in letting off a Cross-bow; wherein neither Head, Hand nor Foot, no, not the nimblest member of the Body (the Eye) stirreth all that while. Fifthly, the Canon hath, St saepius detentus fuerit, if he make a Life or Occupation of it, which his Lordship did not. Burchard saith detectus, and with more reason: and I suppose his Lordship useth it very temperately: yet the Apologist in his Fifth Section insinuateth, that his Lordship doth it often. Sixthly, whereas he saith that the Canon speaketh against Clamosa venatio, not quieta or modesta; I find no such word or distinction in the Canon: yet is there no doubt, that if the Deer be not killed out of hand; but in recovering him, there must be both Clamour and Venatio. Thus he counteth the mouth of the Canon to be stopped. Yet because it is good to make sure work with so dangerous an object, now he setteth Law upon Law, the Common against the Canon or at least the Statute, which indeed hath cracked a great sort of Canons. That by the Statute of Henry VIII. 35. ca 16. No Canon is in force in England, which was not in use, or is contrary or derogatory to the Laws or Statutes of this Realm, or to the Prerogatives of the Royal Crown. Of which sort (he saith) this is one, and gives his reasons: for in Charta de Foresta Archbishops and Bishops by name have liberty to Hunt: and 13. Ric. II. ca 13. A Clergyman who hath 10l. by the year, may keep Greyhounds to Hunt. The name of Charta de Foresta (and also of Hunting) is, Clero lachrimabile nomen. For the first breach that ever was made into the freedom of Clergymen, and which gave passage to all that followed, rose from the occasion of clergymen's Hunting in Forests: which Henry II. greatly discontented with, never rested, till by assent of the Pope's Legate Hugo Petro-leonis, he obtained a Law in the twenty first year of his reign, An. Dom. 1157. To convent them therefore before secular Judges, and there to punish them. But to our purpose: There is no contradiction (as I take it) between the Canon de Clerico Venatore, and Charta or Statutum de Foresta. The Canon doth say, They shall not Hunt; and the Statute doth not say they shall. The words of the Statute ca 17. are thus: An Archbishop, Bishop, Earl, or Baron coming to us upon our command and passing through our Forest, Liccat ei capere unam bestiam vel duas, per visum Forestarii, si praesens fuerit: sin autem, faciat cornare, ne videatur furtum facere. Here is no word of Hunting; but that they may take a Deer; and this they will say cannot be but either with Dogs or Engine, and so consequently by Hunting. But the very words of Charta de Foresta seem to show, that it was not meant, the Bishop should be an Huntsman, for that it admitteth him not to have so much skill in Hunting as to wind an Horn, tho' that by no Law or Canon be forbidden to him. And therefore saith not, Corniat ipse, but Faciat corniare, let him cause an Horn to be blown, etc. I conceive the meaning to be, that the Bishops and Barons shall each of them take as they may; the Barons by Hunting (if they will) in their own Persons; the Bishops as they may, by the hands of their Officers and Servants. It is a common phrase in all old Charters, that the Bishops shall have Sac and Soc, Toll and Team, etc. i. e. cognisance of plea, suit of Court, toll, and such other customs: shall we intent, that he must take these in his own Person? No; it was not Henry the third's meaning, when he granted the Charter of the Forest, to break the Laws of the Church: for at the same time in Magna Charta ca 1. he granteth, that the Church shall have Omnia jura sua integra & libertates suas illaesas; which could not possibly be, if by his Charter he changed the Canons of the Church, especially in matters of Doctrine and Conscience: as, when the Church teacheth that a Clerk may not be a Huntsman, for him to say that he shall be. Doubtless, if he would, the Clergy would not then accept it. In the person of a Bishop there be three distinct Faculties: his Spiritual Function, wherein he is a Bishop; his Legal Ability, wherein he is a Layman and hath liberty to contract, etc. and his Temporal Dignity, wherein he is a Baron and Peer of the Realm, and participateth their privileges. I could put cases wherein every of these may be seen severed from the other; but I should then wander from my matter. Only, I present them thus Anatomyed, that it may appear what portion the Church had in them, what the Commonwealth, and what the King; that so it may also the better appear how the Laws both of the Church and Kingdom are to be applied unto them respectively. When therefore the King granted Temporal lands unto them; tho' they took them as Lay-Barons, and in their Temporal Capacity, yet might they not otherwise use them than might stand with their Spiritual Function: no more than when he granted Ecclesiastical possessions to a Layman, the Grantee might otherwise use them than as a Layman. For example; it was a common thing in old time, that the King granted Churches to Laymen, by the name of Ecclesiam de Dale and Ecclesiam de Sale; yet it was never intended that the Grantee, tho' he had the Churches to order and dispose, should (contrary to his Vocation) meddle with the Divine Service, but present his Clerk only. So in like manner, when the King granted to Clergymen, Chases, Parks, and Warrens; it was not intended that (contrary to the rules of their Profession and Laws of the Church) they should or might become Hunters and Foresters. My long stay upon this point, is a preparative to an answer to the next, which is the Statute of Ric. II. being in the negative, That no Priest nor other Clerk, not advanced to 10l. a year, shall have or keep any Greyhound, nor other Dog to Hunt; nor they shall not use Ferrets, Hays, Nets, Hare-pipes, nor Cords, nor other Engines, for to take and destroy Dear, Hares, nor Coneys, etc. upon pain of one years' imprisonment. The Statute (I say) is in the Negative, and saith that none under 10l. a year shall keep; but saith not in the Affirmative, That it shall be lawful for them that have 10l. a year to keep, etc. I should therefore think, that this Statute doth not discharge a Priest (having 10l. a year and using Hunting) against the Canon-Law: no more than the Statute of Usury, forbidding a Man to take above 10l. loan for an 100l, giveth him liberty to take that 10l. or doth discharge him against the Canons of Usury. Touching his inference, that Linwood speaketh not one word against Hunting simply by Clergymen, but against their using it in places restrained; it is true, for the Text of the Canon led him no further; being only De Clerico, de Transgressione Forestae aut Parci alicujus diffamato, and made to no other intent than to aggravate the censure of the Ecclesiastical Law, which before was not sharp enough against Offenders in that kind. But Johannes de Athon (as great a Canonist and somewhat elder, whom Linwood often citeth and relieth upon as one well understanding the Ecclesiastical Constitutions and the Laws of England) hath apparently condemned it in the place by me recited. Yet is it to be noted, that neither Athon nor Linwood intended to Gloss upon all the Constitutions of the Church of England; but Athon only upon those of Otho and Othobon; and Linwood (beginning where Athon left) upon those of Stephen Archbishop of Canterbury and his Successors. There are therefore a great number of Canons and Constitutions of the Church of England, which neither of these Canonists have either meddled with or so much as touched: as also there be many Statutes in force, which are no where mentioned in any of the Abridgements. But Jo. de Burgo (another English Canonist and Chancellor of Cambridge, who wrote in Richard the Second time) taketh notice of this Canon, and that Hunting was thereby forbidden to our Clergymen, as appeareth in his Pupilla Oculi part. 7. ca 10. m 1 〈…〉 Cleric●r●m . To go on. The Apology saith, That the Archbishop of Canterbury had formerly more than twenty Parks and Chases, to use at his pleasure, and by Charter hath Free-warren in all his lands. Habutsse, lugubre: it seemeth the Wisdom of the latter times (the more p●ty▪ dissented from the former; yet did not the former approve that Bishops should use them at their pleasure, but as the Laws and Canons of the Church permitted. For as they had many Parks and Warrens; so had they many Castles and Fortresses, and might for their safety dwell in them: but as they might not be Soldiers in the one, so might they not be Huntsmen in the other. In like sort, the Abbot and Monks of St. Alban's (as Mat. Paris reporteth the case in An. 1240. pa. 205.) had Free-warren at St. Alban's, &c. by grant of the Kings, and recovered damages against many that entered into the same and Hunted: for the having of it was lawful, as appeareth in the Clementines Tit. de Statu Monast. §. Porro a Venatoribus. But it is there expressly forbidden, that either they should Hunt in it themselves, or be present when others do Hunt, or that they should keep Canes venaticos aut infra monasteria seu domus quas inhabitant, aut eorum clausuras, pa. 207. Radulphus de Diceto in An. 1189. saith, That the Bishops of that time affected to get into their hands Comitatus, Vicecomitatus, vel Castellarias; Counties, Sheriffwicks, and Constable-ships of Castles; but shall we think they either did or might use them in their own Persons, as, with Banners displayed to lead forth the Soldiers of their County, or with Sword and Target to defend the walls of their Castles, or with a white wand to collect the King's Revenues, etc. It is true, that Walter Bishop of Durham, having bought the County of Northumberland of William the Conqueror, would needs sit himself in the County-Court; but he paid dearly for it: for his Countrymen furiously slew him, even sitting there. Matt. Paris in An. 1075. So Hugh Bishop of Coventry exercised the Sheriff's place, but was excommunicate for it, as contra dignitatem Episc. and so acknowledged his error. Dicet. in An. 1190. But every one will say, It was a common thing in old time for Bishops to be Judges in secular Courts. I confess it; and think it godly and lawful as it was used at the first. For the Bishop and the Earl sat together in the County-Court: the Bishop as Chancellor, to deliver Dei rectum and populum do●ere; the Earl as Secular Judge, to deliver rectum seculi and populum coercere; as is manifest by the Laws of King Edgar and others. But when the Bishops began to supply both places, and to be mere Judges of Secular Courts, than were they prohibited by many Canons. And therefore Roger Bishop of Salisbury being importuned by the King to be his Justice; would by no means accept it, till he had obtained Dispensation, not only from his Metropolitan the Archbishop of Canterbury, but from the Pope himself, as Dicetus affirmeth in An. 1190. and no doubt but others of wisdom did the like. In those things therefore that Bishops did against Canons, we must take no example to follow them: for tho' their public actions be manifest, yet their dispensations and matter of excuse is for the most part secret. Neither doth every thing done against a Canon produce Irregularity, if some criminous mischance follow not thereon. For the Record that relateth that the Bishop of Rochester was at his death to render to the Archbishop of Canterbury his kennel of Hounds as a mortuary, and that the Law takes notice of it for the King sede vacant, under the name of Muta canum and Mulctura: I must (as they say in the Law) demand Oyer of the Record; we shall otherwise spend many words in vain. But that Dogs should be given for a Mortuary is against all likelihood. For a Mortuary, is as an offering given (by him that dieth) unto the Church, in recompense of his Tithes forgotten; and it is a plain Text, Deuter. 28. 18. Non offeres mercedem prostibuli, nec pretium canis in domo Domini. But if there be no other word to signify a kennel of Hounds, than Muta canum and Mulctura, the exposition may be doubtful, tho' it come somewhat near it. Freder. II. Emp. in the Prologue to his second Book de Venatione, speaking of an Hawks-mue, saith, Domicula quae dicitur Muta; following the Italian Vulgar, which cometh à mutando, because the Hawk doth there change her coat. And for the affinity between Dogs and Hawks, it may be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 transferred to a Dog-kennel; and whether to the Hounds themselves or no, it is not much material. For, no doubt, they that may have Parks and Warrens, may have Dogs and Hounds for Hunting: but every body that may have Hounds may not use them themselves, as appeareth by that which I said before out of the Clementines, and by the opinion of Justice Brudnel, with the rest of the Judges, 12. Henr. VIII. fol. 5. where it is said, a man may keep Hounds notwithstanding the Statute of 13. Ric. II. but he must not Hunt; as he may keep Apparel of Cloth of Gold, notwithstanding the Statute of Apparel, but he must not wear it. Besides, Religious persons in ancient times were driven to have Dog-kennels for the King's Hounds: for Rad. Niger in An. ..... saith, that King Henry II. Abbates, hypodromos & canum custodes fecit. After all this, his Lordship is defended with the perpetual use of Hunting by Bishops in their Parks; and by the particular examples of some eminent men his Predecessors, and others. This point of use and example I have in a manner answered before; speaking, as it fell in my way, of Bishops being secular Judges. One line serveth to levelly at them both: yet for further and more perspicuous resolution of the matter, see both the example and the use censured in the Decret. 34. Distinct. ca 1. by Pope Nicholas, ad Albinum Archiepisc. alias Aluinum. Quemadmodum relatione fidelium nostris auribus intimatum est, quod Lanfredus Episcopus, qui & juvenis esse dicitur, venationi sit deditus; quod vitium plurimos etiam de Clericali Catalogo, genere duntaxat Germanos & Gallos' irreverenter implicat, Verum iste (si ita est ut audivimus) merito juvenis dicitur, qui juvenilibus desideriis occupatus, nulla gravitate constringitur. Et infra: Nam (ut Beatus dicit Hieronymus) Venatorem nunquam legimus sanctum. Then blaming him also for being too familiar with his daughter, he saith, Oportet ergo fraternitatem tuam Synodale cum Episcopis & Suffraganeis tuis convocare Concilium, & hunc salutaribus colloquiis Episcopum convenire, atque illi pastorali authoritate praecipere quatenus ab omnium bestiarum vel volucrum venatione penitus alienus existat: or (in short) to Excommunicate him. Here he showeth Hunting to be used both by a Bishop and by a multitude of Clerks, (plurimos.) But neither the Person and Dignity of the one, not the multitude nor frequent use in the other, maketh the Pope to abstain from condemning it. Howbeit, they whose example the Apologist allegeth, little respected (as I think) the whole Volume of Canons. Touching the Record of the Earl of Arundel's Excommunication for taking up the Archbishop of Canterbury's Hounds coming into the Earl's grounds to Hunt; and the Archbishop's pleading That it was lawful for him to Hunt in any Forest of England whensoever he would, we must (as we before said) pray Oyer of the Record; for parols font plea, and their certainty appears not here, nor what became of the issue: which, tho' it fell out to be found for the Archbishop, yet perhaps it discharged him not against the Canon. And well might he be as bold with the Canon, as he was with the Law. For it is directly against the Law both of England and France, to Excommunicate a Peer of the Realm without the King's assent: and therefore Henry III was sore offended with the Archbishop for this Excommunication; (and the Bishops of London and Norwich were called in question for the like in Henry the Seconds time; as Matthew Paris reporteth, pa. 99) But because his case sways the cause to the ground; I must dwell a little the longer upon it, to show what became of it. The truth is, it was ended by comprise in the Chapel at Slyndon upon Friday after the Circumcision of our Lord, 1258. that is, 43. Henr. III. in this manner: quod idem Archiepiscopus & successores sui semel in quolibet anno & non plus, cum transierint per dictam Forestam (i. e. de Arundel cum una lesia de sex leporariis sine aliis canibus & sine arcu habeant unum cursum in eundo & alium in redeundo; ita quod si capiant unam feram, illam habebunt; si nihil capiant in illo cursu, nihil habebunt. Si vero capiant plus quam unam feram, Archiepiscopi qui pro tempore fuerint, habeant quam elegerint, & residuum habeant dictus Dominus Johannes & haeredes ejus, etc. Then is it further awarded, that the said Earl, his Heirs, and Assigns, shall yearly for ever pay unto the said Archbishop and his Successors, 13. Bucks and 13. Does, (captas de fermysun as the Record saith) at times there appointed. And then followeth this close, which maketh all plain; Et actum est express in●●r parts de praecepto & ordinatione dictorum Arbitratorum, quod dictae partes procurabunt confirmationem Domini Papae & Domini Regis super praesenti confirmatione. By this Record it appeareth, that neither the Earl could make this grant without Licence from the King, (for that all Forests are the Kings, and no Subject can have them otherwise than in custody) nor the Archbishop could safely use the privilege of Hunting without dispensation from the Pope: and though ●yet find not where the one was obtained from the Pope, yet I find where the other was granted from the King; and namely from Edward the First in the 2 d. year of his Reign; where all the award and composition beforesaid, is (by way of Inspeximus) recited and confirmed. But the composition for the Bucks and Does, was after in Edw. the third's time released by the Archbishop Simon Islip, having taken for the same 240. marks; as witness Antiqq. Britann. ca 55. And it seemeth further by this Record, that the Archbishops of Canterbury had not at that time dispensation from the Pope, to Hunt where they listed in any Forest of England; for than should he not have needed special Dispensation in this case. But howsoever the Dispensation or Confirmation was hereupon obtain; it is apparent that it stretched no further than to Hunt with Greyhounds; for the Bow is expressly forbidden and excepted. It may be, some will extend the word Confirmation, to be meant of some right of Hunting, which the Archbishop (upon this arbitrement) was to disinherit his Church of: which I leave to the judgement of Lawyers. For it may contain both; tho' I never saw any precedent of the Popes in that kind for so small a matter: but of the other kind, we have before made mention of one to Roger Bishop of Salisbury, and a multitude of others are to be produc d. Again, if they have a Dispensation for Hunting, yet it hath some limitation either for the place or the manner; which his Lordship (if he justify under that) must show particularly. To come now at last to to the last point of the Apology, drawn from the particular example of Archbishop Cranmer; who, in the description of his Life (Britannicarum Antiqq. ca 68) is set forth to Hunt, Shoot, and Ride a 〈…〉. great or stirring Horse with notable activity, even when he was Archbishop, and in the words recited by the Apologist. But these be 1 To Ride, Shoot and Hunt, be the three Martial Qualities, whereby the Rutil in the ninth Book of V●g●●, proveth his Countrymen to be good Soldiers: V●na●● invigilant pu●ri, sylv●sque ●atigant. Flectere lud●s eq●●s, & spicula vendere cerney. Exercises of War, not of Religion; fit for Barons not for Bishops; who in ancient time, following the example of our Saviour and his Apostles, walked on foot, as appear by Bede, Eccl. Hist. l. 3. ca 14. & lib. 4. ca 3. and beginning to Ride, 1 Vid. Malm. p. 214. l. 93. Balaeus Cent. 1. ca 74. in Append. citat. Magdeburgg. Cent. 7. ca 7. col. 204. used here in England Mares, as Bede also witnesseth, lib. 2. ca 13. in other places Mules, not Horses; for Bellum haec armenta minantur, as not only the Poet saith, but as the Scripture also, Prov. 21. ult. Equus paratur ad diem belli. And such belike, did this Archbishop Cranmer mount upon and manage, as the words imply, ut in famulatu suo non fuerit quisquam qui in generosum equum salire, ac tractare elegantius— potuisset. Besides, the shooting here mentioned seemeth not to be the longbow, which stirreth the body and is profitable to health, but that deadly Engine (which imagineth mischief as a law) the Cross-bowe, whose force a man cannot mitigate as in other weapons, and is properly numbered amongst the instruments of War; and therefore by a multitude of Canons prohibited to Clergymen, so that they may not use them 2 Pos●unt tamen Clerici arma portare ●x causa justa, utputa si transeat per loca periculosa, ad terrorem latronum, licet non debent perc●tere. Pupil. Oc. par. 7. ca 10. I. ubi Libri citantur alii. pro justitia exercenda (as appeareth by the Constit. of Othob. Tit.) de Clericis arma portan. nor equitantes per loca periculosa, as it is in the Gloss upon the Decret. of Gratian p. 992. where the Text is, Clerici arma portantes & usurarii excommunicentur. But I have gone the length of my tedder, I mean as far as the Apology leadeth me; and therefore now manum de tabula. The case of this Reverend and most Worthy Person deserveth great commiseration and tender handling: for who can prevent such unexpected casualties? Yet may the consequence prove so mischievous both to himself and those that are to receive their Consecration from him, as of necessity it must be carefully looked into and provided for. Let me remember an ancient precedent, even in one of his own Predecessors, Stigand, Archbishop of Canterbury in the time of the Conquest, who, because he had not Canonically received his Consecration, but from the hands of Pope Benedict (who stood Excommunicate and sacris interdictus) was not only deprived himself by authority of a Council, but also the Bishops and Abbots which had taken their Consecration from him. Therefore the Bishops of Wells and Hereford foreseeing that evil; to make all clear, fetch their Consecration at Rome from Pope Nicholas: Vitabant enim (saith Flor. Wigorn. in An. 1070.) 3 V. Malm. de Gest. Pontif. l. 1. pa. 204. l. 50. à Stigando qui tunc Archiepiscopatui Doroberniae praesidebat, ordinari: quia noverant illum non Canonice Pallium suscepisse. It is good to follow the counsel of Gratian in the like matter: Consultius est in hujusmodi dubio abstinere quam celebrare, ca 24. 1716. But because we are fallen into a case, wherein perhaps some extraordinary Consecration may be required; let me also relate a strange Consecration used in the entrance of the Reign of 4 Chron. pa. 44. col. a. Henry I. An. 1100. where Eadmere a Monk of Canterbury being elected by the Clergy and People of Scotland to be Bishop of St. Andrews, with the great good liking of King Alexander and the Nobility. Yet by reason of some discontentments the same King had conceived against the Archbishop of York, within whose Province Scotland then was, he would by no means agree that Eadmere should take his Consecration from that Archbishop; and after much consultation how then it might otherwise be performed, it was at last agreed, that the Staff of the Bishopric should be solemnly laid upon the Altar, and that Eadmere taking it from thence, should receive it as delivered him from God himself: which accordingly was done. This calleth to my mind another of like nature, somewhat more ancient: where Wulstan, the good Bishop of Worcester, both resigned his Bishopric by laying the Staff thereof upon the shrine of St. Edward the Confessor (by the agreement of a Council holden under Lanfranc) and in like manner received the same again from thence, in the presence of King William, the Archbishop Lanfranc, and many others; not without some miracle, as Matthew Paris writeth it in An. 1095. These as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉. And thus, in this matter of Shooting, If I have done as the Proverb saith, Shot like a Gentleman, that is fair, though far off, it sufficeth. I humbly crave pardon. 19 Octob. 1621. Recep. Apolog. ●5. Octob. praeced. SOME Letters and Instruments, Concerning The kill of Hawkins by Archbishop ABBOT. A Letter written by his Majesty to the Lord Keeper, the Bishops of London, Winton, Rochester, St. david's, and Exeter, Sir Henry Hobart Kt. Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas, Mr. Justice Dodderidge, Sir Henry Martin, and Mr. Doctor Steward, or any six of them, whereof the Lord Keeper, the Bishops of London, Winton, and St. David's, to be four. IT is not unknown unto you what happened this last Summer unfortunately to our Right Trusty and our Right Wellbeloved Counsellor the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury; who Shooting at a Deer with a Cross-bow in Bramsil-park, did with that shoot casually give the Keeper a wound, whereof he died. Which accident, though it might have happened to any other man, yet because his Eminent Rank and Function in the Church, hath (as we are informed) ministered occasion of some doubts, as making the Case different in his Person, in respect of the Scandal (as is supposed:) We therefore being desirous (as it is fit We should) to be satisfied therein, and reposing especial Trust in your Learning and Judgement; have made choice of you to inform Us concerning the nature of this Case: And do therefore require you to take it presently into your consideration, and the Scandal that may have risen thereupon: And to certify Us, what in your Judgements the same may amount unto, either to an Irregularity or otherwise. And lastly, what means may be found to redress the same (if need be) of all which points We shall expect to hear your Reports, with what diligence and expedition you possibly may. Dated at Theobalds' 3. Oct. 1621. A Letter from the Lord Keeper to Archbishop Abbot, intimating the Reception of his Majesty's Letter. May it please your Grace. MY Lord of Winchester, my Lord Hobart, Sir John Dodderidge, Dr. Martin, and myself, having met this afternoon about a Letter sent unto us (together with some others) under his Majesty's Signet; and finding the Contents thereof to require from us some information of the nature of an unfortunate Act, which doth refer unto your Grace: We thought ourselves tied in all justice and respect, to send your Grace (as I do here enclosed) a copy of his Majesty's Letter: And to let your Grace understand, that we are ready to receive from your Grace (in writing) all the qualifying circumstance, of the Fact (if any such there be) omitted in this Letter; that we may be better grounded to deliver our Opinions (as is desired) concerning the nature of this unlucky accident. And we have appointed two of the clock in the afternoon upon Saturday next, to be the time; and this College of Westminster, to be the place of our meeting, to receive what information of the Fact, your Grace shall 〈…〉 unto us, And ceasing to be further troublesome, I shall 〈…〉 Your Grace's poor Friend and Servant Jo. Lane. & C. S. Westminst. Coll. 〈…〉 of October 162●. The Archbishop's Answer. My very good Lords, I Thank you for sending me the Copy of his Majesty's Letter, which concerneth the ●nhappy 〈…〉 that befell me in Hampshire. I here enclosed send unto your 〈◊〉 a ●opy of the Verdict given up by the Jurors unto the Coroner: as also a 〈…〉 of some circumstances of this Fact, which are not expressed in that Verdict. 〈◊〉 the first▪ being already upon Oath, it needeth not (as I conceive, under your Lor●s●●● (favour) any further verification: And for the other, such of the particular● a● are not included in the Verdict, there are in readiness those who will testify the ●ame. And for the better expedition of the whole business, if your 〈…〉 all on●● 〈◊〉 what are the special points in Law to be insisted upon; I will, 〈…〉 ●ll, 〈◊〉 sp●●●, cause my Council to be ready to attend you: by whom I desire to give your Lordship's satisfaction. And so commending my Love and Service to your Lordships, and forbearing to be further troublesome, I rest Your Lordship's very loving Friend G. Cant. Lambeth, Oct. 13. 1621. A Note of my Lord Keepers at the bottom of the Letter. To this Letter we answered, that we had no Warrant to hear Counsel; no● could we in justice hear any, unless the credit of the Church and honour of the King, had their Council likewise on the other side. Jo. Linc. & C. S. The opinion of the Bishops and others to whom the consideration of Archbishop Abbot▪ s Case was referred; in a Letter to his Majesty. May ●t please your Majesty. WHereas we received a command from your Majesty under your Royal 〈◊〉 to deliver our opinions unto your Majesty, whether an Irregularity or 〈◊〉 might ar●se by this unfortunate Act, which God permitted to come to pass by thusand of the most Reverend Father in God the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury, ●●ooting in a Cross-bowe at a Deer in Bramsil-park; as also of the cure and 〈…〉 the same Irregularity, in case it should be so adjudgd. 〈◊〉 do in all 〈…〉 humility return this account unto your Majesty: 〈…〉 the first, 〈…〉 be contracted by this Act, in the person of my Lord 〈…〉 greater part of our number could assent or agree: Because 〈…〉 and 〈◊〉 themselves are so general and so ready to entertain distinctions and limitations, the Doctors and Glosses so differing, inferences and disputes so peculiar to every man's conceit and apprehension, authorities of Canonists and Casuists so opposite in this very Case in hand; that we could not return unto your Majesty any unanimous resolution or opinion in the same. For the second, Whether any Scandal may arise out of this Act? We are of opinion, a Scandal may be taken by the weak at home and the malicious abroad; tho' most of us believe there was no Scandal given by the said Right Reverend Father. For the third, We are all agreed, not only that a Restitution or Dispensation may be granted by your Majesty, either immediately under the Great Seal, or (which most of us in all humility represent unto your Majesty) by the hands of some Clergymen, Delegated by your Majesty for that purpose, or what other way your Majesty shall be pleased to extend that favour. But withal, we are of opinion, that it is most sitting for the said Reverend Father, both in regard of his Person and the honour of the Church, to sue unto your most Gracious Majesty for the said Dispensation in majorem cautelam, si qua forte sit Irregularitas. All which, craving pardon for our weakness, we do in all humbleness submit to the decision of your Majesty's most profound and incomparable Wisdom. Jo. Linc. elect. C. S. Geo. London.— La. Winton.— Jo. Roffens. Guil. Menevens. elect.— Valen. Exon. elect. Henr. Hobart. Jo. Doddridge. H. Marten. Nigh. steward. Cir. di. 10. Nou. 1621. DISPENSATIO CUM GEORGIO Archiepiscopo CANTUARIENSI, Super IRREGULARITATE. REverendissimo in Christo Patri Georgio Providentia Divina Cantuariensi Archiepiscopo, totius Angliae Primati & Metropolitano, Johannes Lincoln. Georgius London. Lancelotus Winton. Samuel Norwicens. Thomas Coven. & Lich. Arthurus Bathon. & Wellen. Nicolaus Eliensis & Georgius Cicestrensis permissione divina respective Episcopi de Provincia Cantuar. Salutem & gratiam in Domino sempiternam. Recipimus Literas Commissionales à Serenissimo in Christo Principe ac Domino nostro domino Jacobo Dei gratia Angliae, Scotiae, Franciae & Hiberniae Rege, fidei defensore, etc. sub magno sigillo Angliae confectas & nobis directas; quarum tenor sequitur in haec verba: Jacobus Dei gratia Angliae, Scotiae, Franciae, & Hiberniae Rex, fidei defensor, etc. Reverendo in Christo Patri & perdilecto & perquam fideli Consiliario nostro Johanni Episcopo Lincoln. Custodi magni sigilli nostri Angliae, ac Reverendo in Christo Patri Georgio Episcopo London. ac Reverendo in Christo Patri ac perdilecto & perquam fideli Consiliario nostro Lanceloto Episcopo Winton. necnon Reverendis in Christo patribus Samueli Norwicen. Thomae Coven. & Lichen. Nicholas Elien. Arthuro Bathon. & Wellen. & Georgio Cicestren. respective Episcopis▪ Salutem & gratiam. Humili nobis supplicatione exposuit Reverendissimus in Christo Pater, perdilectus & per fidelis Consiliarius noster Georgius Cantuar. Archiepiscopus, quod cum nuper in parco quodam vocato Bramzil-park apud Bramzil in Comitatu nostro Southamton. per honorandum virum ejusdem parci dominum rogatus & invitatus damam sagitta figere destinaret, debita adhibita diligentia ne quid inde periculi cuiquam eveniret; forte tamen accidit ut sagitta ab eo emissa & in feram directa, in quendam Petrum Hawkins adhunc Parci praedicti Custodem, improvide & temere se periculo ictus sagittae exponentem, & per locum ubi a praefato Archiepiscopo conspici non potuit cum imp●tu transcurrentem incideret, eique brachiam sauciaret; ex quo quidem vuln●re▪ ●ra unius horae spacium expiraba●: & quamvis propter hujusmodi homicidium casuale, nulla praefati Archiepiscopi culpa sed ipsius occisi temeritate contig●ns, idem Reverendissimus Pater bona fretus conscientia, se nullam omnino irregularitatem incurrisse, persuasissimum habeat; provida tamen animi circumspec●ione, & ut omnis infirmorum mentibus scrupulus eximatur, secum a nobis super omni & omnimoda irregularitate & irregularitatis nota aut suspicione, si quam praemissorum ratione contraxisse forsitan aliquibus videri possit, ad cautelam & ex superabundanti dispensari humiliter supplicavit: Sciatis igitur quod nos petitionis hujusmodi vim & ●fficaciam reg●o animo & pro affectu ponderantes, & de veritate praemissorum solicita indagatione certiores facti, & ut piam Reverendissimi Patris intention●m ●ac in re s●quamur, & ad abundatiorem cautelam, persidelis Consiliarii nostri 〈◊〉 ●ue de E●cl●si● & Republica m●r●●i Prae●ulis statum, famam, & dignitatem, nostri etiam patrocinii minime teneri & firmare dignoscamur, ad praesentem venimus dispositionem: Vobisque vel aliquibus sex vestrum, quorum vos praefat. Johannem Lincoln. Georgium London. Lancelotum Winton. & Samuelem Norwicen. respective Episcopos, quatuor esse volumus, de quorum etiam side, judicio, & industria plurimum confidimus, mandamus & de gratia nostra speciali & ex auctoritate nostra regia suprema & Ecclesiastica qua fungimur, pro nobis, haeredibus, & successoribus nostris damus & plenam concedimus facultatem & potestatem per praesentes, quatenus vos vel aliqui sex vestrum; quorum vos praefatos, Johannem Lincoln. Georgium London. Lancelotum Winton. & Samuelem Norwicen. respective Episcopos, quatuor esse volumus, cum praefato Reverendissimo Patre super omni & omnimod. juris vel facti defectu, censura, sive poena aliqua Canonica & Ecclesiastica, praesertim vero Irregularitate omni seu Irregularitatis nota (si quae forsitan ratione praemissorum contracta fuit) vel quibusdam contracta esse videantur, utque in susceptis Ordinibus & Jurisdictionibus secundum concreditam sibi ratione Ordinis & Archiepiscopatus sui potestatem libere ministrare, frui, exercere, & gaudere valeat, ad majorem cautelam dispensetis, ac caetera omnia & singula quae ad statum, commodum, & honorem praefati Reverendissimi Patris conservandum & corroborandum in hoc parte necessaria fuerint seu quomodolibet opportuna faciatis, & dispensationem hujusmodi, caeteraque sic ut praefertur per vos aut aliquos sex vestrum, quorum vos praefatas, Johannem Lincoln. Georgium London. Lancelotum Winton. & Samuelem Norwicen. respective Episcopos, quatuor esse volumus, facienda in debita juris forma concepta, & inscripta, reducta, sigillisque vestris seu sigillo aliquo authentico munita, praefato Archiopiscopo tradere non differatis. Quam quidem Dispensationem, caeteraque sic ut praefertur per vos aut aliquos sex vestrum, quorum vos praefatos, Johannem Lincoln. Georgium London. Lancelotum Winton. & Samuelem Norwicen. respective Episcopos, quatuor esse volumus, pagenda sub magno insuper sigillo nostro Angliae confirmari volumus, & super hiis praefati magni sigilli nostri Custodi aliisque Cancellariae nostrae ministris quibuscunque expresse mandamus, & plenam tenore praesentium concedimus potestatem. Teste meipso apud Westmon. vicesimo secundo die Novembris, Anno regni nostri Angliae, Franciae, & Hiberniae, decimo nono & Scotiae LV. Secundum tenorem & exigentiam Literarum Commissionalium praerecitatarum, & ad eximendum omnem scrupulum ab infirmorum mentibus, si quis forsitan sit aut fuerit in ea parte conceptus. Nos praedicti, Johannes Lincoln. Georgius London. Lancelotus Winton. Samuel Norwicen. Thomas Coven. & Lichfeld. Arthurus Bathon. & Wellen. Richardus Elien. & Georgius Cicestrens. respective Episcopi, nomine primitus invocato ac Deum patrem oculis solum habentes, & considerantes atque pro certo habentes quod dicta venatio cui per te data erat opera, quando dictum casuale homicidium (te nihil tale suspicante) accidebat, erat modesta, decens, & quieta, & quod debita per se adhibita erat diligentia in dicta venatione ad praecavendum ne quid periculi alicui inde eveniret, Tecum praefato Georgio Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi super omni Irregularitate & Irregularitatis nota, si quam forsitan ratione casualis homicidii sive mortis praefati Petri Hawkins incurristi vel aliquibus incurrisse videaris ad omnem & qualemcunque juris effectum dispensamus; teque praefatum Georgium Archiepiscopum Cantuariensem ac personam tuam ab omnibus & singulis inhabilitatibus, suspensionibus, irregularitatibus, aliisque poenis, impedimentis, censuris, & coercionibus quibuscunque Ecclesiasticis sive Canonicis (si quam forsitan ratione praemissorum aut eorum alicujus incurristi aut aliquibus incurrisse videaris) ad omnem & qualemcunque juris effectum liberamus ac tenore praesentium pro liberato haberi decernimus & pronunciamus: quemque defectum, labem, notam, sive maculam, (si quam forsitan ratione praemissorum aut eorum alicujus contraxisti aut aliquibus contraxisse videaris, penitus abolemus ac pro abolitis haberi decernimus & pronunciamus: Teque etiam praefatum Georgium Archiepiscopum Cantuariensem ex superabundanti & ad majorem cautelam, rehabilitamus & restituimus ad omnem & qualemcunque juris effectum: Et ut in susceptis Ordinibus & Archiepiscopatu praedicto, ac in omnibus & singulis jurisdictionibus, privilegiis, praeeminentiis, praerogativis, dignitatibus, alque aliis rebus quibuscunque, aliqu● modo ad dictum Archiepiscopatum spectantibus & pertinentibus libere ministrare valeas, concedimus & indulgemus, perinde ac si praedictum casuale homicidium commissum non fuisset; Canonibus, Legibus, Decretis, Ordinationibus, & Constitutionibus Ecclesiasticis quibuscunque contrariis (si quae sint in ca parte contraria) in aliquo non obstantibus. In cujus rei testimonium, sigilla nostra Episcopalia hisce praesentibus apponi fecimus. Dat. duodecimo die Decembris, Anno Domini millesimo sexcentesimo vicesimo primo. Teste Rege apud Westmon. 24. die Decembris Anno Regni Regis Jacobi, etc. XIX. & Scotiae quinquagesimo quinto. Of the ORIGINAL OF TESTAMENTS and WILLS, 17. June 1633. And of their PROBATE, To whom it anciently belonged. THE word Testament or any other for a last Will, is not found in all the Scripture before Christ's time. And tho' it be common in the vulgar Translation, yet St. Jerome noteth, that it is according to the Hebrew to signify Pactum or F●dus, and so the Geneva Translation expresseth it. Although therefore there be many passages in the Old Testament which seem to be meant of Wills, and so expounded by Interpreters: As where it is said that Achitophel ¹ put his house in order and hanged himself. And where Hezekiah 2 Kings 15. 1. is commanded from God to put his house in order for he should die. Yet there appeareth no Law nor form of Wills; and the declarations that Jacob, Moses, Joshua, David, etc. made at the times of their death were matter of consolation and counsel, effata novissima or ultima elogia 3 Cod. de Testam. 1. 30. , but not Testaments as we use the word. Sigonius in his book of Jewish Antiquities maketh no mention of their Wills, nor do I yet find any in Josephus. It is true, that S. Paul maketh express mention of them, but not till the Romans had conquered the Jews, and imposed their Law upon them. Then S. Paul speaketh of them according to the Roman Law, not Judaical. Of all this I desire further advertisement. It is observed that the ancient Greeks, who (as Josephus testifieth) fetched their Laws from the Jews, had not any. Tacitus reporteth of the Germans in his time, which was about 80. years after Christ, Successores sui cuique liberi & nullum testamentum. Si liberi non sunt, proximus gradus in possessione, fratres, patruus, avunculus with their descendants according to our Law. It is therefore very probable, that our Saxon Ancestors, coming out of Germany, observed for a long time the custom of their Country, and that they had not the use of making Wills; as neither had their brethren the Normans. The custom therefore of making Wills among the Germane and Northern Nations was taken up by little and little from the Romans in some places after one manner, in some after another, as it is to be seen in France itself. When the Roman Emperors grew potent in Germany, and the Germane Princes came to be Emperors, the Germans generally forsook their ancient custom spoken of by Tacitus, and received the Roman Law. The rest of the Angli that remained in Germany and came not over into England, made a Law 4 L. Angl. tit. 13. de potestate testandi p. 485. about the year of our Lord 900. That it should be lawful for a Freeman to dispose his inheritance by Will as he pleased. 2 Sam. 17. 23. The Normans kept the old custom 1 Cust. reform. d● Norman. Art. 414. in part, and left it in the other part. They suffered him that had neither wife nor children (if he were twenty year old) to make a Will and bequeath his movable goods as he listed, either to or from his kindred. So likewise if he 2 Art. 420. were married and his wife dead. Having children 3 Art. 418. he could dispose but of a third part. And so might man or woman of 16. years old. But land which they (according to the Civilians) called immovable goods, no man * Art. 415. amongst them might dispose of by his Will. In some other parts of France 4 Gloss. ad Art. 412. as in Champain, they disposed both movable and immovable, that is, goods and lands, according to the Civil Law. The Civil Law custom they called Lex Romana, the other Lex Barbara. Our Saxon Ancestors by direction of their Clergy, who chiefly affected the Roman manners, seem also to have observed the Civil Law in making of Wills both in substance for disposing Lands and Goods, and much in the form and ceremony of making and publishing the same. As Carolus Magnus 5 Engolism. in vita Carol. p. 31. in France disposed the Lands of his great dominions between his three sons, Lewis, Pepin, and Charles, by his last Will. So by his example King Ethelwulfus 6 Testam. Alfredi in Angl. Norm. p. 22. here divided his Lands by his Will between his three sons, Aethelbald, Aethelred, and Aelfred. King Aelfred 7 Testam. praedict. in the like manner disposed both his Lands and Goods by his Will now extant. And many other Saxons 8 Lib. Rams. §. 130. by their Wills in writing, bequeathed Lands and Goods with their Bodies unto Monasteries. That herein they followed the Civil Law is manifest by the Saxon Will of Birtrick 9 Lamb. Itin. Cantiae. p. 492. and Elf●uith his wife, made about the year 980. (according to the manner of that time) by them both jointly. First it seemeth to be made in calatis Comitiis 10 Instit. de test. ord. §. sed ut. , that is, in an assembly called together for that purpose. Then whereas the Civil Law 11 Ibid. §. sed cum. requireth necessarily VII. witnesses, here were a dozen, lest it might be defective in that one was a woman, and 12 Ibid. §. Testes autem. some other under age or Bondmen. The disposition of Lands as well as of Goods, is by the Civil Law, and therefore the course is more solemn. Which also this well observeth both for disposing Land and Goods and also for the solemnity of the course. But most evidently it appeareth to be according to the Civil Law, in that the man and his wife join both together in it, which was neither in use nor resolved to be good till the Novel Constitution 13 Constit. Novel. lib. ix. tit. 4. of Theodosius and Valentinian did authorize it. After this Constitution that kind of Testament became so common, that Marculfus 14 Formul lib. 11. cap. 17. , who lived about the year 660. hath left unto us an especial formula or precedent of it as it was then in use in France. And saith in it, that it was ut Romanae Legis decrevit authoritas. And concludeth it with an imprecation or curse against such as should violate it, as doth also the Will of Birtrick. With the like solemnity of witnesses (eight in number besides a Lady) did Elfere another Saxon before Birtrick, bequeath the Town or Land of Snodland to the Church of S. Andrews. Of the Probate of Wills or Testaments. After the Will was thus composed, the Roman use 15 ff. de Tab. exhib. L. Si quis. was to have the Testator and Witnesses to subscribe it, then binding it up close with thread, to seal it with their Seals, which upon producing of it they or many of them were to view and acknowledge before the Praetor or Judge. And then 1 Paul. Sent. lib. iv. tit. 6. Bign. p. 566. rupto lino the thread being cut, it was opened and published, and copies of it delivered to the parties under a Public Seal, the Original remaining in the public Register. The ancient manner of opening, publishing, or as we call it, proving of Wills before the Magister Census, is described by 2 Gloss. Cod. de Testam. L. 18. John Fabri. But nearer to our purpose is that in the Formulae of Marculfus 3 Lib. 11. cap. 37. & 38. of a Will proved in a City or Corporation before the Magistrate there, or of a Town before the Defensor Plebis. For a Will by the Civil Law and the use of our neighbour Nations, might be proved before divers Officers and in divers places. We already mentioned the Praetor, but 4 ff. fo. 168. Cod. Instit. de Testam. lib. 23. f. 554. Justiman the Emperor ordained that in Rome none should be opened save by the Magister Census. In the Provinces by a Constitution of Theodosius, 5 Cod. Theod. lib. 8. the Rectores Provinciarum, and where the access to them was uneasy, there Donations and Wills made in Cities and Corporations might be exhibited and proved before Magistratus Municipales the Magistrates there; in other Towns before the Defensor Plebis. According to these two last are the formulae of Marculfus and another in Brissonius. From these Constitutions of the Emperors, grew the various manner of Probate of Wills amongst us in ancient time. With the Magister Census being proper only to the City of Rome we have nothing to do. But as we were once a Province of the Empire, so our Ancestors received and held the manner of Provinces. For the Rectores Provinciarum, which with us were the Earls of the Counties, had the cognisance or Probation of Wills as shall by and by appear. So also had divers of our Magistratus Municipales, Magistrates of Cities and Corporations: As that which I am best acquainted with my Neighbours of Lenn Episcopi, now Kings Lynn in Norfolk. And instead of the Defensores Plebis in an ordinary Town, the Lord of the Town or Manor both had, and hath that privilege with us in divers places. All this while there is no mention of any Ecclesiastical Person, which we must now look into. The fourth Council 6 Cap. VIII. of Carthage ordained, that Episcopus tuitionem testamentorum non suscipiat, and this Canon Gratian has taken into the Body of the Canon Law, whereto the Gloss saith: Tuitionem, id est, apertionem, sc. coram eo non apperiantur, sed coram Magistro Census. C. de testam. L. Consulta. And tho' it addeth vel dicatur quod non sit advocatus ad tuendum testamentum, yet that seemeth an idle interpretation: for tho' Epiphanius maketh mention that Bishops in old time judged Causes, yet it was never known that they pleaded Causes. But it is apparent, that the Clergymen in those days took upon them to prove Wills even in Justinian's time, who flourished An. Dom. 530. And therefore he prohibited 7 Cod. de testam. Lib. 23 fol. 354. them not only by a Constitution, but also by a mulct of 50. pound weight of Gold, saying Absurdum est namque si promiscuis actibus rerum turbentur officia, & alii creditum alius subtrahat; ac praecipue 8 Clericis ut D. L. 5. de Episcopi & Cleri repetita. Clericis quibus opprobrium est, si peritos se velint disceptationum esse forensium ostendere. But here we see that the Clergy even in those days, had set their foot upon the business, and I suppose that since that time they never pulled it wholly out again. It is like the Eastern Nations adhering to the Empire did observe it. But the Western being torn from it by the Northern Nations Saxons, Goths and Normans, took and left as they thought good. Re●●ardus King of the Western Goths about the year 594. tho' he 1 Wi●●goth. 〈◊〉 11. 〈◊〉 v. ●. 12. retained the manner of the Civil Law in making Wills, yet he ordained that they should be publish▪ d by a Priest as formerly they had been. His successor Chindavin●us about An. 650. making a Law about a Military Will ordained, 2 Wisigoth. 〈◊〉 11. 〈◊〉 v. L. 13. that it should be examined by the Bishop and Earl, and ratified by the hand of a Priest and the Earl. As the Northern Nations I speak of the Goths, the Saxons, and Normans, were of Neighbour and affinity in their Habitation, Language, and Original, so were they also in their Laws and Manners. Therefore as the Goths trusted to their Priests with the passing of Wills, so did the Normans, their Custom and Law 3 la Coust. ref●r. Art. 412. was that Tout testament doit estre passe par devant le Curè, ou Vicaire, notaire ou tabellion en la presence de daux temotn●s idoines d● XX. ans accomplis & non legataires. That all Testaments shall pass before the Curate or Vicar, etc. where the Commentary 4 Verb. Notaire o● Tabellion. noteth, that it must be the Curate or Vicar of the same Parish, where the Testator dwelleth. And that Notary hath been adjudged to be a Notary Apostolic or Ecclesiastical. So that the business was then with them wholly in the hands of the Clergy. This ancient Norman use liveth to this day in many Towns of England. The Parson of Castle Rising in Norfolk hath the Probat of Testaments in that Town. And so hath the Parson of Rydon, and the Parson of North-Wotton in North-Wotton. To go back to our Saxon Ancestors. I see they held a kind of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or similitude of Laws with their brethren the Goths and Normans. And tho' I find no positive constitution among them in this point, yet ab acts & judicatis (the supporters of the Common Law itself) we may perceive what their Custom and Law was. Elf●re who lived before the year 960. having made his Will 5 〈◊〉 ●ir●r. Iti●. Can● p ●96. , did afterward publish the same before Odo the Archbishop of Canterbury, Elfsy the Priest of Croyden, and many other. Birtrick and his wife in no long time after declared 6 Ibid. p. 492. their Will at Mepham before Elfstane Bishop of Rochester, Wine the Priest, and divers other. See a MS. Law 7 LL. Alur. c. 37. of King Alured the Great, who flourished An. 880. De eo qu● terram testam●ntalem habet, quam ei par●ntes sui dimiserunt: ponimus ne illam extra cognationem suam ●●ttere possit, si scriptum intersit testamenti, & testes quod ●orum prohibitto fuerit, qui ha●c imprimis acquisiverint & ipsorum qui dederint ei n● hoc possit, & hoc in Regis & Episcopi testimonio recitetur coram parentela sua. It is said in the Civil Law 8 Cod. de testam. 〈…〉 352. that the declaration of a Testament before the Prince omnium Testamentorum solennitatem superat. Here the Bishop is joined with the King in cognisance of the Testament by the copulative &, but Mr. Lambard (tho' I confess it agreeth not with the Saxon) maketh it in the disjunctive, coram Rege aut Episcopo, as if it might be before either of them. The Saxon 9 〈…〉 Alum. ●. ●7. is on Cyninge & bisceopes geƿitnysse, in R●gis & Episcopi testimonio. Be it one or the other it cometh much to a reckoning, for the presence of the King was then represented in the County by the person of the Earl of the County, as it is this day in his Bench by the person of his Judges. And the Earl and Bishop sitting together in the Court of the County did (as if the King and the Bishop had been there) hear jointly, not only the causes of Wills spoken of in this Law, wherein the Bishop had special interest, but other also that came before them: And therefore in those days the extent of the Earl's County and the Bishop's Diocese had but one limit. To this purpose is the Law 1 Edg. LL. Secul. of King Edgar Cap. 5. and the like of Canutus 2 Canut. LL. Secul. cap. 17. MS. Cap. 17. Comitatus bis in anno congregatur nisi plus necesse sit, & in illo Comitatu sint Episcopus & Comes qui ostendant populo & justitiam Dei & rectitudines seculi. The Saxon is, & ðaere beon ðaere scyre biscop & see Ealdorman. Let the shire Bishop be there and the Alderman, so than they called the Earl. Thus both Ecclesiastical and Secular Causes were both decided in the County Court, where, by the Canons of the Church the Ecclesiastical Causes were first determined, and then the Secular. And many Laws and Constitutions 3 Longob. lib. 11. tit. 53. Capitular. lib. IV. tit. 71. there be to keep good correspondency between the Bishop and the Earl or Alderman. And as both kind of justice were administered in the County Court, so were they also in the Hundred Court; in which course they continued in both Courts till the very time of the Conquest, as it seemeth, and almost all his time after. But about the eighteenth year of his Regn, by a Common Council of the Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, and Princes of the Kingdom, (which we now call a Parliament) he ordained, as appeareth in a Charter 4 Inter privil. Eccl. Lincoln. indulta & à Ric. II. per inspex. confirm. anno ejus 2do. Ch. 2. m. 2. n. 4. of his then granted to Remigius Bishop of Lincoln, Vt nullus Episcopus vel Archidiaconus de legibus Episcopalibus amplius in Hundred placita teneat, nec causam quae ad regimen animarum pertinet ad judicium secularium omnium adducant, sed quicunque secundum Episcopales leges de quacunque causa vel culpa interpellatus fuerit, ad locum quem ad hoc Episcopus ei elegerit & nominaverit veniat, ibique de causa vel culpa sua respondeat & non secundum Hundred, sed secundum Canon's & Episcopales leges, rectum Deo & Episcopo suo faciat, etc. What ensued upon this, and how the Bishop and Earl divided their Causes and Jurisdiction appeareth not; That of Wills belonged either wholly to the Earl (as Rector Provinciae) by the Constitution of Theodosius, or as much to the Earl as to the Bishop, by the Laws of King Edgar and Canutus. But the subsequent use must inform us what was then done upon it. And thereby it seemeth that all went wholly to the Bishop and Clergy, and that the Saxon custom was changed, and the Norman introduced: And that the name of Court Christian or Ecclesiastical, sprung not up or was heard of till after this division. For now the devising of Lands by Will after the Saxon manner was left, and the goods themselves could not be bequeathed, but according to the use of Normandy. A third part must remain to the wife, a third part to the heir (or children) and a third part the husband might dispose by his Will. The Norman manner appeareth at large by their Custumary, and the English at that time briefly touched by Glanvil 5 Lib. VII. cap. 5. . But let the Will and the matter thereof be what it would. It seemeth the Insinuation, Probate, and Cognisance of it, belonged generally now unto the Bishop and Clergy, tho' I must confess it be hard to find manifest proof thereof in those ancient days of the Conqueror and his Sons. We must therefore discover as we can, and very material (in my understanding) to that purpose is the testimony which I find in the ancient Laws 6 Reg. Maj. lib. 1. cap. 2. §. 1. of Scotland, composed by the commandment of David their King, who lived long in the time of King Henry I. Son of the Conqueror, and of King Stephen the Conqueror Grandchild. For those Laws have that similitude with ours of that time delivered by Glanvil, as that in effect they be much what the same, mutatis mutandis, etc. and very often totidem verbis with Glanvil. It is there said under the title De causis ad Ecclesiam spectantibus, etc. Pla●●tum de dotibus, & de testamentis ad forum Ecclesiasticum pertinet. Dower was then thought to belong to the Ecclesiastical Court, because it was a dependency of Marriages, which doth belong to that Court. And the Rule was, Qui est Judex in principali est Judex in acc●ssorio. But to our purpose it is plain, that Testaments were then the ●ure Ecclesiastico in Scotland, and doubtless even then also in England. For not long after (in Henry II's time) Glanvil 1 Lib. VII. ●ap. 7. Mag●. Cart. Hen▪ I. ●ap. 9 himself doth testify as much, saying, that where the Testator nameth no Executor, his next of kin possunt se ad hoc faciendum ingerere, and might have a Writ to the Sheriff (in the form there recited) against them, that detained any of the Goods: and then addeth, si quis autem Auctoritate hujus Brevis conventus dixerit contra Testamentum, soil. quod non suit rationabiliter factum, vel quod res petita non fuerit, ita ut dicitur legata, tun● quidem placitum illud in Curia Christianitatis audiri debet & terminari, etc. At this time Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was grown to that exorbitant height and latitude, that they neither doubted to convent the King himself to their Synod, as Henry Bishop of Winchester and Legate did King Stephen to the Synod of Winchester, nor to put him to corporal punishment under the name of penance, as the Monks of Canterbury did King Henry II. by whipping him. In ordinary matters therefore, no doubt but they extended their jurisdiction very far. Yet all this while was not the decretum Gratiani come into the World. In Henry III. time, Bracton expresseth Wills and Testaments to belong to the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, as Glanvil had done before in Henry II. and the Scottish Laws in Henry I. time. Si de testamento oriatur contentio in foro Ecclesiastico debet placitum terminari, quia de causa testamentaria (sicut nec de causa matrimoniali) Curia Regis non se intromittit, etc. I am now come to the lists of the modern Common Law, and I dare venture no further. FINIS. ICENIA: SIVE NORFOLCIAE Descriptio Topographica. Ab HENRICO SPELMANNO Equ. Aur. ICENIA. Icenorum nomina. ICeni nostri, quibus nixi sunt initiis, & unde nomen asciverint; nec proditum reor à veteribus, nec rimatum feliciter à recentioribus. Caesar (hospes) Cenimagnos vocat: Ptolemaeus (altero velut orbe dissitus) Simenos: Tacitus, Praefecti Britanniae gener, & diuturnus in Gallia Belgica magistratus, certiusque igitur insequendus, Icenos. Mitto, qui Tigenos; sine dubio perperam. Icenorum derivatio. Non à Rege aliquo nuncupatos, cum Camdeno censeo: sed nec ut ille à forma loci, quam Britanni (inquit) Iken, id est, cuneum vocant. Certe Ptolomaei tabula & comperta ratio, quadrangulam potius justam, quam cuneatam faciunt. Mallem ego ab Ise fluvio celeberrimo, Britannis Ichen, totam regionem brachiis longe divaricatis transeuntem, deducendos. Sic apud Asiaticos, Indi ab Indo; apud Graecos, Maeones à Maeonia; apud Scythas, Alani ab Alano; apud Germanos, Alsati ab Alsa; apud Gallos, Sequani à Sequana, fluminibus. Sic in ipsa Anglia, Derbienses á Derwent; Lancastrenses à Lan, alias Lon fluvio, ut ipse agnoscit Camdenus 1 Pag. 554. a. & 754. b. noster; Northumbrenses ab Humbro; & Wiltoniae Comitatus à Guillo, i. e. Willo fluvio, ut perhibet Wigorniensis. Nec obest (s) in (c) migratio, cum in voce conservetur sonus, & Ptolemaeo litera, quam alii tamen in (g) mutant. Soliti autem sunt Britanni pro Graeco σ, ch. ponere, ut Ichen pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, Soch pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, i. e. sue, Buch pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. bove. Ise fluvius unde dictus. Fluvii nomen ab Ise, alias Iside, gentium Dea, sortitum videatur. Priscis, quippe in more fuit, sylvas, montes, fluvios Numinibus consecrare, eorumque appellare nominibus. Britannos vero prae Diis aliis Cererem & Proserpinam, (quae & Isis dicitur) inferna coluisse numina Strabo perhibet. Hinc infernales sui ritus, & nocturna sacra. Nox diem ducit; & per noctes, dierum seriem; per lunas, mensium; per hyemes, annorum numerant. Sic hodie à Seven-night pro VII. diebus; à Fortnight, quasi fourteen-night, pro XIV. diebus dicimus. Et majores nostri XX. XXX. Xl. Winters, pro totidem annis recitabant. Hyemem autem ideo consecrabant infernalibus, quod rerum semina sub hoc tempore ab eisdem existimabant conservari. Hinc & in fluviis nostris celeberrimis, crebrum Isis nomen, alias caelibis, ut Brigantum Isis; Isis Icenorum; & Isis Dobunorum: alias conjugis, ut Tham-isis, Is-urium, & hujusmodi. Iceniae termini Sed Iceniae videamus terminos; quibus includit Camdenus Norfolciam, Suffolciam, Cantabrigiae Comitatum, & Huntingtoniae. Quod ut non probetur facile, ita sat difficile est ad refellendum. Ptolemaeus Simenos ponit inter Catieuchlanos & Metarim aestum, versus Boream; Trinobantes versus Austrum; Dobunos & Coritanoes versus Occidentem; & Germanicum Oceanum versus Orientem. Sed quibus hi destituuntur invicem finibus, non exponit. Camdenus Coritanos locat, ubi Ptolemaeus inversis sedibus Catieuchlanos; mediterraneos scil. ubi hic maritimos, & è contra. Auctorem non laudat; propter viri tamen eminentiam inficias non ibo; ne crassa versans caligine, falsis illudar imaginibus. Haud tamen censeam priscos illos Britanniae populos adeo certis & definitis limitibus disterminatos, cum Scriptores Antiqui tractum potius quo versati sunt obscuriores populi, quam tractuum limites designaverint. Et qui fieri possit, ut hod●●rnis Comitatuum finibus dividerent●● olim B●●●anni veteres, cum Comitatus ipsi a Saxonibus postea, & plerunque ab Aluredo non ultra 〈…〉 anni●, dim●tati sint? Reor equidem priscarum gentium terminos, 〈◊〉 barbararum, instar magni aestuarii, nunc expansiores fuisse, nunc contractio●●●, juxta potentiam & deliquium suorum Principum. Sic Londinum ipsum, tot●●s Insulae Metropolin, alias a veteribus in Essexia, alias in Middl●s●xia vidimus collocatam. Eversa Britannia, divisaque a victoribus Romanis in quinque ditiones citra vallum quod instituit Hadrianus, restituitque postmodum Severus Imperator (sell. in Britanniam primam, Britanniam secundam, ●laviam Caesariensem, Valentiam, & maximam Caesariensem) cessit Icenorum hic tractus (ut Camdeno pla●ui●) in ●laviam Caesariensem. Celebre vero Antiquitatis monumentum, quod Notitia utriusque Imp●rii nuncupatur, in— Vi●ariorum Britanniarum Insulam ponens; Britanniam secundam locat (consulto dixeris, an fortu●●o) ubi Ptolemaeus Trinobantes & Simenos. Sed ejectis tandem Britannis, cum reliquiis Romanorum, descendit Flaviae nomen, pariter & Iceniae ad inferos, vocaturque a Saxonibus tractus iste East-Angle i. Anglia Orientalis, quod gens Anglorum cum Saxonibus e Germania venientium, suam hic obtinuislent sedem, parte alia circa Humbrum incolente. Quibus tamen limitibus claudebatur, cum nec adhuc in Comitatus distincta ●sset insula, satis videatur ambigendum, dimensionem licet satis habeamus explicatam. In antiquissima enim descriptione omnium praediarum, ex Australi parte Humbri fluminis, East-Engl perhibetur 30000. hidas demetiri. Hidam Beda familiam vocat, & vulgus alias pro 100 & 120. acris terrae aestimavit. Nec semper tamen definite; sed Normanni postea caru●atam appellarunt, Scriptores medii seculi coloniam, & Romani olim villam rusticam. Cum ●●●o Aluredus, Rex (sine invidia dixerim) inter Principes optimos laudatissimus, Angliam totam ad priscam Germanorum politiam in Shiras, quas plerique Comitatus; Centurias (quas hundreda jam & wapentachia) & Decanias (quas Fri●ergas vulgo & Tithingas appellamus) divisisset; concluditur East-Anglorum ditio trium Shirarum extensione, Norfolciae, Suffolciae, & Cantabrigiae. Non dico, Comitatuum, quod ad unum omnes sub hoc seculo pertinuer● Comitatum; siquidem ut ad unum Episcopatum. Comitatus enim plures saepe obtinuit shiras, & iisdem quibus Episcopatus finiebatur terminis; quod Episcopus & Comes simul considentes, populo jus dicerent; hic humanum ille vero divinum. Haec, pulsis Britannis, inter advenas Saxones conditio fuit; donec erectam in Monarchiam Aluredus, Angliam totam in certas portiones dissecuit; quae a facto, Shires hodie asque appellantur. Qua partitione, licet antiquos Britannorum limites in quibusdam observasse non est dubium; in aliis tamen longius discessisse certum est. Ideoque— Sectiones Britannicis respondere non credendae sunt. Deposita autem controversia (ut certa nostro argumento s●●na statuatu●) concedamus hodiernos Norfolciae, Suffolciae, Cantabrigiae, & Huntingtoniae tractus, Icenorum ambitu contineri. Redacta heptarchia in Monarchiam, Canutus Magnus Angliae, Daniae, Norwegiae, aliarumque gentium Borealium Rex, Monarchiam hanc in Tetrarchiae speciem disposuit, viz. West-Saxoniae regimen, sibimet; East-Angliam (cujus duces Vlfkettelum patrem & Athelwardum filium in Essenduni praelio trucidavera●▪ quaeque ja●● Norsol●iam & Suffolciam complecti dicitur) Turkillo Comiti; M●rciam seu partem Mediterraneam, Edrico principi perfido; & Northumbriam, Henrico designavit. Sic sit East-Anglia, Anglo-dania; & cum novo populo novas suscipit leges, quae a conditoribus Dene-la 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, i. e. lex Danorum, appellatus. Prioribus igitur duabus (i. e. ●est-Saxon-lag & Mereen-lag) accedens, jam tertia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 constituit, è quibus cum Edvardus Confessor unam ex omnibus deduxisset, Communemque inde appellasset; Gulielmus I. à Danes & Norwegis oriundus, Danorum illam profundiorem & honestiorem aliis fuisse contendens, eam omnino suscitaverat, si vehementissimis Magnatum deprecationibus non fuisset remoratus. Ab hoc vero tempore ita claruerunt Norfolcienses pietatis studio & splendidis ingeniis; ut hinc in legum scientia primas obtinentes, quolibet aevo, regni tribunalia scientissimis judicibus, subsellia argutissimis Jurisconsultis ornarunt: illinc rerum coelestium ardore conciti plus minus jam 700. Ecclesias in hoc tractu, & ultro 70. coenobia (quot in simili spatio nusquam invenies) condiderunt. Vivit sat honeste ipsa plebecula; cujus tamen rusticitatem famoso derisit carmine (quod aliquando vidimus) sub Johannis Regis exitu Monachus quidam Petroburgensis, sic exordiens: 1 Bal. 261. Edictum exiit Augusto Caesare Qui mittens nuncios jussit describere Mundi provincias summo cum opere. Erat vero tunc quidam familiaris ejus Norfolcianus, Jo. de S. Omero, cujus nominis familia in Well juxta Wisbech sedem habuit, & foemina haerede ad Beaupreos transiit. Ille monachi vesaniam indignatus, patrias edit vindicias, numeros reddens numeris, & rhythmos rhythmis: opusculum inscribit Norfolcianae descriptionis impugnationem. Sic inchoatur. Edictum fingitur factum à Caesare. Sub Rege autem Johanne 2 Walsing. Ypod. in An. 1215. p. 462. novas suscepisse periclitabatur Norfolcia & Suffolcia incolas. Has enim provincias ipse, ut dicebat, per Chartam suam Hugoni de Bones dederat, qui cum 60. millia armatorum in auxilium ejus comparasset, una omnes à pelago sunt absorpti, & cadaver Hugonis cum mersorum multitudine tam foeminarum & infantium quam virorum, Gernemutae ejectum. Multitudo aërem ipsum inficiens morbum & pestem provincialibus intulit; quos ut viva statuerat extinguere, & sedes hic sibi perpetuas comparare, voti quodammodo compos efficitur. De Cael● & Solo. E quatuor his Regiunculis; mediterraneae sunt omnino Huntingtoniensis & Cantabrigiensis: maritimae, pro dimidio, Norfolcia & Suffolcia. Coelum omnibus velut unum, mite satis & tenue; sed maritimis refrigerantius. Solum unicuique proprium; sed mediterrane is pinguius. Huntingtonia pascuis aptior; Cantabrigia Cereri; Suffolcia lacte scatet & caseo; Norfolcia vellere est nobilior. Mediterraneae tantum ex humo vivunt. Maritimae autem, cum Thetim habent vicinam, penu praeterea illic funguntur ditissima. Huntingtonia, leviter montana est: Cantabrigia, tota campestris: Suffolcia, sylvis consita: Norfolcia, omnium particeps. Singularum fines in paludibus coëunt; ubi commune omnibus flumen unum est, amplum, piscosum, & navigationi commodissimum. Ousam dicunt; sed corrupte (ut mihi videtur) pro Isidem. E paludibus damnum saepe omnes ferunt; lucrum tamen annuò non exiguum; praeter ingentem vim piscium & aquatilium. Fluvius iste mediterraneis multis regiunculis tanquam via lactea est; qua merces & alia vitae necessaria copiose inferunt & deferunt: ejusque in ostio, instar clavis, Lenna sedet. Aliud flumen celebre Huntingtonia non habet, nec Cantabrigia: habent vere tum Suffolcia; tum Norfolcia, quae & caeteras, rivulorum multitudine, antecellit. Succedit proxima Suffolcia. Indigere videtur Cantabrigia; sed magis tamen Huntingtonia. Metallum nulla effodit, nec carbones: ne structiles quidem lapides; si non Norfolcia. Eliensis insula in paludibus sedet; contineturque sub Cantabrigiae appellatione. Marslandia Marslandia (quae ex nomine cognoscitur, palustre solum) 30000. metit● jugera, inter VII. villas distributa. Aggere cingitur elatiori, ab Australi plaga recentium undarum impetum, à Boreali marinarum, cohibente. Eoum latus fortius rodit Isis fluvius; Occiduum, furens à Vulturno aestuarium. Incolis hinc perpetua formido & periculum; sed in aggere communis salus & fiducia. Singulas tamen villas singuli claudunt aggeres alii, ne submersa una pereant caetera. Bis sub nostra memoria generale passae sunt diluvium, Aquarum dulcium An. Dom. 15—; salsarum, An. 1613. qua (ut mihi inter alios regio diplomate designatos) pagensium juramento innotuit, damnum supra 42000. libras illatum esse. Aggerem quippe non ut alias trajecit pelagus; sed transiliit altius toto pede; quod ne indies faciat miraculo prohibetur & divina misericordia. 1 Plin. l. 11. cap. 97. Octogenis enim cubitis supra Britanniam intumescere aestus, Pythias Massiliensis auctor est. O bone Deus, qui mare nobis ut Israelitis olim, murum dedit in perpetuum suae bonitatis testimonium! Solum hie omnino pingue, sed robustum: pascuis igitur atque pecore laetum, magis quam in Cerere. Fossis & elicibus quibus centum & undeni incumbunt latericii pontes & ponticuli vermiculatim dissectum; cum ad educendum inimicum imb●em, tum ad inducendum expetitum. Fontem enim nullum habet neque rivulum: n●● talpam alit nec soricam. W●l●●k●. W●lt●n●. W●lpole. In Marslandiae parte extima, versus Occidentem, sitae sunt, Walsoka, id est, immunitas juxta aggerem: Waltona, id est, villa ad aggerem: & Walpola, quod est, gurges prope aggerem, Wall enim à vallo ductum, aggerem significat, & per translationem, murum. Pertinebant olim priores duae ad Abbatem Ramesiensem. Waltona scilicet, ex dono Albredae viduae Eustachii de Scelleia sub Henrico I. Walpola vero ad Ecclesiam Eliensem, natalitiis clara S. Goderici heremitae, cujus vitam & miracula Parisiensis 2 M. Pa●is▪ in anno 1170 plurime decantavit. T●●●ington S Ma●ies. In viciniis jacent Terrington & St. Maries; hoc familiae Chervillorum qui de Capra-villa olim dicebantur, & pro crista capram emblema nominis detulere antiquum patrimonium. Sed defunctis nuper Henrico Cheruil Equite, & filia sua, in Cobbarum scribitur haereditatem. Illud Howardorum, qui hoc olim tractu maxime claruere, vetus sedes, & ad ingentia conservatrix felicissima. Splendida etiam hic Ecclesia cujus aliquando Rector Edmundus Gundevill, Collegium sui nominis exstruxit Cantabrigiae sub An. Dom. 1348. Tylney. Adjacet Tylney, veteris utique Tilneiorum familiae radix; quae per filiam & haeredem Frederici Tilney Equitis amplissimi, in Howardianam stirpem tertio hinc seculo confluens, auctiorem eam multo reddidit. Hic se expandit Tylney-Smeeth. insignis area, quae à planicie nuncupatur Tylney-Smeeth, pinguis adeo & luxurians ut Paduana pascua videatur superasse. Cum enim VII. villarum majora animalia quotidie recipit compascentia; oves tamen praeterea plus minus 30000. alere perhibetur; nulla excedens extensione bis mille passus. Tuentur eum indigenae velut aras & focos, fabellamque recitant longa petitam vetustate de Hikifrico (nescio quo) Haii illius instar in Scotorum Chronicis qui civium suorum dedignatus fuga, aratrum quod agebat, solvit; arreptoque temone furibundus insiliit in hostes, victoriamque ademit exultantibus. Sic cum de agri istius finibus acriter olim dimicatum esset inter fundi dominum & villarum incolas, nec valerent hi adversus eum consistere; cedentibus occurrit Hikifrikus, axemque excutiens à curru quem agebat, eo vice gladii usus; rota, clypei; invasores repulit ad ipsos quibus nunc funguntur terminos. Ostendunt in coemiterio Tilniensi, sepulchrum sui pugilis, axem cum rota insculptum exhibens. Wigenhall. Nec procul Wigenhall, antiquae etiam cognomen stirpis. Magna hujus pars ante aliquot secula ita aquis opprimebatur, ut neglecta generaliter occupantibus permitteretur. Multi igitur sedes sibi illic elaborantes, totam pene in aridum redegerunt; metuentesque jam tum ejici, in obsequium potentiorum se tradidere, censum & tenuram patrocinii causa agnoscentes; ut antiqua refert Inquisitio. Wisebeach. Extra aggeris partem illam, quam the Podike vocant, soil. inter Isidem fluvium & municipium Eliensis Episcopi, quod à situ in Occidentali glarea Wisebeach dicitur (Wise enim Saxonice, ut in Wisegothorum nomine, Occidentale sonat) Well habetur, id est puteus. Cum enim circumclusa jam Marslandia, aquarum impediretur dilatatio, huc se recipientes ut in puteum, superficiem late opprimebant. Nobilissima fit interea piscatura, quam Ailwinus Dux East-Angliae, & totius Angliae Aldermannus, cognatus Regis Edgari, & Fundator Coenobii Ramesiensis (circiter An. Dom. 970.) eidem coenobio contulit, cum mansis & toftis piscatorum, (ut verbis utar 1 Sect. 124. Ramesiensis Codicis.) Mansit (ut videtur) sub eadem conditione, usque ad aetatem Regis Gulielmi I. qui Ecclesiae illi confirmans praedia, Concedo ( 2 Sect. 174. inquit) in Welles 20. homines piscatores, singulis annis 60. milliaria anguillarum (i. e. singulis Monachis singula milliaria) ibidem reddentes. Emersit postea in villam celebrem, partim in Insula Eliensi, partim in Norfolcia (fluvio dividente) sitam; foro, nundinis, & uberrimis privilegiis sub Abbatibus Ramesiae honestatam, dimidiique hundredi fretam dignitate. Beaupreovum Hic & Beau-preovum seu de Bello prato, sedes opulenta; praesertim cum excisis Monasteriis Ramesiense hic dominium comparassent: quod cum reliquo suo patrimonio Edmundus Beaupre Dorothea transtulit, quam ex Winteri aliquando suscepit conjuge. Nuptaque ea viro insigni Roberto Bell, qui Capitalis Baro Scaccarii effectus est, à nepote ex filio corundem Roberto Bell, splendidi ingenii Equite, possidetur. Tydd Haud procul, in Lincolniensi tractu (nam confinia lambens, memorabile quod occurrit non praeteream) Tydd conspicitur. Vicus pauper, sed cujus aliquando Rector (quem Personam vocant) Nicolaus Breakespeare à Roma in Norwegiam missus, eam praedicando ad fidem convertit Christianam: & ab Eugenio [III.] Albanus ideo constitutus est Episcopus Cardinalis; creatusque est ipse post Eugenium [& Anastasium] An. Dom. 1154. Papa Hadrianus IU. Consulum hic ademit potestatem; quae orbem olim, urbem hactenus administrasset; sibi retinens & successoribus. Copiosissime in hoc & palustri reliqua regione, [effoditur] fomes terrea; quae (à Torff, antiquo Rege Danico, ut ..... prodit inventore) torff, etiam hodie appellantur; & Latine Turbae à crassioris labii forensibus. Mallem vero à Sax. tyrf quod cespitem notat, (V. Gloss. nost.) ni inventorem à re inventa dictum opinatus fueris. Isis 〈◊〉. Jam in Norfolciae continentem transeundus est undosus noster Plemmyrium, h. e. Isis fluvius; qui semper equidem non est transeundus. Cum enim in duobus aequinoctiis maxime tumeant marini aestus, & potissimum (ut Plinius notat) sub Autumnali plenilunio; hunc interdum è mari praevolat adeo insanus undae cumulus, qui se fluvii undis obviis non apponit, sed earum superficiem ita rapide superlabitur, ut velocitate equitantem superet, & furore quaelibet occurrentia mergat & evertat. Venientem fugiunt naviculae, & ipsa aquatica volatilia cum ingenti strepitu. Fluvii accolae hoc à feritate the Eagar nuncupant, Matthaeus Parisiensis (si recte intellexerim) Hygram: aliud reor quam Graecorum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, sed non aliud quam undarum ingens cumulus, quem è lato collectum mari in angustias fluvii subdito detrudit aestus. In latiori enim ejus parte non ita saevit. Taceo copiosam fluvii piscaturam; de eo tamen dicam, ut de Pergusa lacu 2 Sect. 174. Ovid — Non illo plura Caister Carmina cygnorum labentibus audit in undis. Clacklose Cent. Trajecto Iside, in Centuriam Clacklose pervenitur; quae cum multis in eadem villis ad Ramesiense olim spectabat Monasterium; hodie ad amplissimum 3 Met. l. 5. Equitem Johannem Har●; velut unum illius Abbatiae coh●r●dum. Ad ponti● 〈…〉 transitum primum obest Downham-market, a montano sita nomen habens▪ doun en●m mons est, ham habitatio: sed in membranis Regiis Downeham-hithe, i. e. portus, appellatur. Mercatum illis antiquissimum; nam ab 1 〈…〉 ●15. Edwardo Confessore confirmatum reperi. Aspicit prope in aequali situ Domini sui aedes 〈…〉 amplas & exim●as, annum circiter 15—. a Nicholas Hare, Jurisperito ad Stow-Bardolfe extructas, sed lat●fundiis ●gregie ditatas beneficio Hugonis Hare, juris item peri●i & fratris Nicolai, qui coelebs excedens, 40000. lib. & eo amplius dicto Joanni ex Ricardo fratre pronepoti, & tantundem Hugo●, Dommo Colera●● in Hibernia ex Johanne fratre nepoti, testamento dedit; me in eodem supravisore inter alios descripto. 〈…〉 Copiosissime in palustri hic tractu effodiuntur focales cespites, quos Turffs appellant, Danorum nobis beneficium. A Torfo enim ipsorum Rege (qui floruit 2 Chron. Lindenbrog de R●gib Da● An. Dom.—) inventos referunt; nomenque tenuisse inventoris. Sub●st Wallington, quod ● Coningesbeis cum uxore transiit ad Franciscum Gaudy, Capitalem nuper Civilium Placitorum Justitiarium, qui congesta h●●● plurima dominia, nepti suae e filia Comiti Warwici desponsatae, transmisit omnia. ●iliam aut●m duxerat Gulielmus Hatton, Cancellarii ● sorore nepos. 〈…〉 Paulum hinc in Euro-notum ad paludum marginem, sita est West-Deerham villula, cunis memoranda Huberti Walter, filii Harvei Walter, & fratris Theobaldi Walter, Hiberniae pincernae, a quo illustrissima Pincernarum familia▪ quam Butl●r vocant) & Ormondiae Comites (ut testatur 3 Wa●●us i● Woney perg. Charta Fundationis Coenob●● de Woney in Hibernia) originem ducunt. Hic Hubertus sub Ranulpho de Glanvilla, illustri illo totius Angliae Justitiario enutritus, evasit Archiepiscopus Cantuariae, Cancellarius Regis Ricardi I. Legatus papae Celest●i 〈…〉 IU. & tot●us etiam Angliae Justitiarius. Miraberis tot in unum collatos Magistratus, praesertim si recte intellexeris quanti sub hoc seculo munus fuerit Justitiarii, potestate scil. omnes regni Magistratus, dignitate omnes superantis proceres. Post Regem, primus universam complectebatur solus rem judiciariam; Officium Capitalis Justitiarii regii tribunalis, Capitalis Justitiarii Civilium Placitorum, Capitalis Baronis Scaccarii, & in plerisque Magistri Pup●llorum. Disposuit de Thesauro Regis, & in regni arduis elato peragebat omnia supercilio. In absentia Regis (quae sub istis seculis crebro accidit) regni custos & Pro-rex salutatur. Tantos edidit villa haec obscura partus; qui tamen coactus est ab Innocentio IU. fasces istos seculares deponere, & aratro Christi totus indulgere. Ad cunarum vero decus, Coenobium in West-Deereham condidit: acceptique memor beneficii, instituit, ut pro anima Ranulphi de Glanvilla, patroni sui, preces hic perpetuo funderentur. Sed descriptis ab Henrico VIII. in fiscum Monasteriis, Thomas Deereham ut à nomine ●edem compararet, anno 33. ejusdem Regis hoc mercatus est; possidetque hod●e post cr●bram haeredum mutationem, e quinto filio nepos ejus homonymus, Equ●s probus. 〈…〉 Progredienti mox occurrit Ox●burgh, dictum (ut suspicor) pro Ouse-burgh, quod ad Isem fluvium, quem Ouse appellant, sit appositum. Sic Oxeforde, pro Ouse-forde. Nomen antiquitatem loquitur & eminentiam. Urbes enim quas Britanni ●strias, saxons nostri & German● Burghs vocant (ut & recte notat Littletonu●● a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, pro turri. Haud tamen aio, Burgos apud nos omnes, ●●●sse ol●● urbes: nam vox alias munimen quodlibet, & interdum montem no●at, a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, ab assurgendo in altum [instar turris.] Oxburgus igitur, si clarum aliquando oppidum non exstiterit, locum tamen munitum fuisse non est dubitandum. Hoc idem generaliter statuo de villis omnibus, in quorum nomine burgh deprehenditur. Sedes antique fuit Weilandorum; è qua familia Thomas W●ilandus, Capitalis Justitiarius civilium Placitorum, 18. Edw. I. in exilium mittitur à Parliamento. Postea venit ad Tuddenhamos, & deinde (haeredis eorum nuptiis) ad Bedingfeildos, claros aliquando in aula Regia, & florentes hodie latifundiis. Duxerat quippe Edmundus Bedingfeildus sororem Thomae Tuddenhami Equitis amplissimi; & ex regni vicissitudine fortunarum suarum dispendium metuentes, pactum ineunt obsignatis tabulis, quod Bedingfeildus signa sequeretur Edouardi IV. Tuddenhamus vero Henrici VI. & si belli alea Edovardo cederet, Bedingfeildus gratiam Regis Tuddenhamo compararet; sin é contra Tuddenhamus id praestaret Bedingfeildo. Victoriam autem obtinente Edovardo IV. Bedingfeildus à Rege impetrat Tuddenhami patrimonium, sed Tuddenhamus ipse capite plectitur; clam hoc omne; nam utrique aliter capitale. Hinc processit versus Oxburgum, quarto distantem lapide; velut burgos conjunctura fossa alia hodie locis aliquibus complanata; at Centuriam Clacklose, qua à fluviis non cingebatur, muniens & disterminans. Transiens autem juxta Bicham-well, appellatur Bicham-dich; & devenit terminus Libertatum Bicham-ditch. Newmarket-ditch Ramesiensis Ecclesiae ex parte Clacklos (ut Newmarket-dich libertatum S. Ethelredae ad coenobium S. Edmundi Buriensis pertinentium.) Sic enim Charta Henr. I. Sect. 215. Sciatis me concessisse & confirmasse Ecclesiae S. Benedict. de Ramesia, etc. Socam, sacam— & omnes libertates & omnia placita ad coronam meam pertinentia apud Bancastre & Ringsted & apud Clacos-hundred & dimid. cum 64. Socomannis ad hundredum pertinentibus, scilicet infra Bicham-dich & apud forum de Dunham, quod pertinet ad Winebodesham. Socomanni dicti sunt coloni, qui domino suo rem expediunt frumentariam: & cum in coenobio Ramesiensi 60. essent Monachi, qui totidem anguillarum vescerentur milliariis, ut in Well supra memoravimus, hic singuli singulis suppeditantur Socomannis, cererem ministrantibus, quatuor Abbati reservatis. Swafham Quinto hinc lapide, in acclivi solo Swafham conspicitur; mercatu nobilis, quem à Rege ..... obtinuit. Aërem exhibet à laudatissimo medico laudatissimum. Splendidam item Ecclesiam, cujus insulam borealem pedaneus condidit aginator. Castle-Acre. Descenditur hinc ad Castle-Acre, i. e. castellum in agro; quod è resurgente monte late prospicit adjacentia. Prisca hic sedes altera Comitum Warrenniae; quorum antecessor Willelmus de Warrenna forestarius Regis Gulielmi Conquestoris, & Gulielmus de Albeneiaco pincerna ejus, sortes adeo luculentas in Occidua tulerunt Norfolciae parte, cum Normannis divideretur, ut nulla pene villa quae ab Episcopo aliquo vel Monasterio non possideretur, quin in alterius eorum ditionem cessit. Testantur hoc antiqui Libri Feodales, qui alterutrum faciunt cujusque pene villae capitalem Dominum. Ad radicem castelli (quod rudera tantum nunc ostendit) Gulielmus de Warenna Comes Surregiae, An. Dom. 1090. condidit Prioratum in honorem beatae Virginis Mariae, cellam vero futuram statuit Lewensi Monasterio, quod in Sussexia pater ejus Gulielmus instituerat. Hic me monet locus, ut cum prudentia junctam [eorum] pietatem memorem, qui non minus animae saluti quam corporis consulentes, spiritualibus se militibus contra hostes spirituales, aeque ac secularibus contra seculares munierunt. Vix enim reperitur primaria sedes alicujus magnatis, quae castello suo non subjunxit coenobium. West-acre. Nar. Claruit & contiguis West-acre eximio Monasterio. Castelli pomoerium & utriusque moenia Monasterii perlabitur fluviolus elegans, Nar (quod aliis commune est nomen) mihi ut videtur appellatus. Nam in procursu statim occurrit Narford villula, quasi Narris vadum; & subinde Narburgh, quasi Narford. burgus seu castrum ad Narrem: cui belle convenit quod in Ligurinis canitur, 1 Gunther. l. 4. p. 337. Meliori subdita Caelo Castra locat, gelidas vicini Naris ad undas. dictum de Narnia, oppido Italiae, cui Nar fluvius interluens nomen indidit; & Tyberi conjungitur: exemploque monitus ego, villas has nostras Narniam advadum, & Narniam ad burgum appellabo. 〈…〉 Quod de Narburgh prodiderunt incerti senes, ego posteris non refundam. Nec his fidem mendicabo, quae Johannes Bramis Thetfordensis Monachus, circa aevum Henrici IU. (ut scriptura Codicis mihi suggerit) in historia Waldei Regis hujus tractus, decantavit. Saepe tamen ejus nititur auctoritate Jo. Catus, in Antiquitate Cantabrigiensis Academiae, & ab eodem succrevisse lumen mihi aliquando, non negaverim. Laborare cum fateor Normannorum & Gallorum vitio, quo Romani suos deturparunt, fictitia veris commiscentes. Nerburgum resert, civitatem fuisse sub aevo Uter Pendragonis, qui Rex Britanniae floruit An. Dom. 500 Comiti cuidam Okenardo subditam. Eam à Waldeo fortiter obsessam, defendisse strenue septem mensibus Okenardum; noctuque saepe exsilientem hostium multos interfecisse: & Florentium quendam Waldeo dilectissimum truculenter vulnerasse; Waldeum facto gravius irritantem: qui vindictae acriter jam incumbens, Okenardum ad extremas adegit angustias. Fractum igitur, à Seneschallo suo admonitum fuisse ut se fugae traderet: St enim (inquit Senescallus) te Rex Waldeus in manibus poterit habere, te ut latronem faciet interire. Igitur cum Rex supervenerit, fugies de civitate ista, & nos castellum istud custodiemus, mittemusque ad Waldeum, & vitam nobis & membra obtinebimus ab eo, priusquam trademus illud in manus illius. Okenardus igitur, nocte superveniente, equo ascenso, egressus est; venit & Londonias ad Uther, etc. Senescallus autem de salute pactus, civitatem reddit, & Waldens protinus delevit eam. Haec & plura Brainis. Rerum illic antique gestarum, testimonium adfert ipse locus. Sepimentum vetus militare, ubi (si forte uspiam) castellum Okenardi. saxons burgum vocant, & a Narburgo usque ad Oxburgum velut burgos conjunctura protenta olim fossa militaris, hodie licet locis aliquot complanata. Adde quod dum Clemens Spelman Eques, 30. abhinc annis, hortum novum sub radice burgi moliretur, multa humana ossa cum armorum partibus aliquot sunt effossa. Longe autem ante Normannorum adventum, inducto aratro; illud civitatis exhalavit dignitatem. De ea enim, ut de villula rusticana, sic Liber Angliae Censualis, qui Domesdei appellatur, sub Titulis Norff. Roger. & Hundred. de Grenehow: Nereburgh tenuit Aelwius tempore Regis Edwardi Confessoris, modo R. Vicarius terrae pro Manerio. Tunc [erant ibidem] 38. villanis, & post 28. modo similiter. Tunc & semper 10. Bordarii; modo tres. Tunc & post in dominio 3. carucatas [terrae;] modo 2. Aelwius iste videtur fuisse Danus, ut plerique sub hoc aevo Norfolcienses; ejectus autem à Rogero supradicto, puta Bigoto Normanno, cui amplam in hoc tractu partem Gulielmus Conquestor elargitus est. R. vicarius terrae (uti censeo) fuit Robertus, aut Rogerus de Narburgh, qui Rogeri vice hoc manerio fruitur, & splendidae Narburgorum familiae (qui à Bigotis ipsum acceperunt, ut castrum suum Norwicense feodali jure tuerentur) initium dedit. Deficiente vero sub Henrico VI. prole mascula Ela filia Gulielmi de Narburgh Shouldamo primum, & secundis nuptiis Henrico Spelman collocatur, e quorum filio juniori Johanne Spelman, secundo Justitiario Regii tribunalis, valde (ut Fitz-herbert testatur) perito in lege, Johannes atnepos Narburgo potitur. 〈…〉 Sh●●ldham. A Narburgh crebra ludens vertigine, ad Marham & Pentney, claram utramque suo Monialium coenobio tendit fluviolus. Deinde ad Shouldham coenobio item ornatam, & exhausta propemodum antiqua familia Shouldhamorum, aquilam Wormgey 〈◊〉 auream in coelo ceruleo gestantium. Mox allabitur Wormgey & Middleton, castello & coenobio Monialium aliquando insignem, ad Barones de Scales, & postea ad Comites Oxoniae ex nuptiis spectantem. Illam castello item & coenobio decoratam, & à [Willielmo] de Warrenna primo Comite Surriae, ad Bardolphos clarissimos Barones deductum. Jam ad Lennum properans Narra fluvius, domino suo Isidi conjungitur▪ qui Congunum fluvium ex parte alia suscipiens, insignem in compitis stationem oppido insigni expedivit. Dici autem Len (nam corrupte Lyn) à Britannico Len ●hyn pro stagno aut diffusis aquis, si vox eo traheretur (ut Camdenus voluit) non assentior. Saxonicum plane existimo, & alias praedium, alias feodum significare. Sic apud Germanos hodie Fanelhen, praedium feu feodum Baronis; & Len-Episcopi idem plane quod praedium Episcopi. Contrahitur etiam vox Saxonibus nostris non tam praedium significare, quam praedium Ecclesiasticum; quod in aliarum villarum nominibus saepius deprehenderis, & Britannis ipsis (si hoc malueris) omnino similiter. Illis enim (si mihi non imponant) Ter-llen significat terram Ecclesiae, vel Ecclesiasticorum. Labitur & vir optimus pede altero. Nam hoc dictum opinatur Lennum Episcopi; illud in adversa ripa, (vulgo Old-Len) Lennum Regis: cum Len-Regis idem sit à tempore Henrici VIII. quod eausque Len Episcopi. Permutante enim Rege cum Episcopo Norwicensi Monasterium S. Benedicti de Hulmo, & terras plurimas, pro terris & dominiis Episcopatus sui; Len inter alia ad Regem transiit, & jam inde nomen (ut oportuit) in Lenn Regis commutavit. Glauci forte & Diomedis permutatio; recte vero si ariolar, sol eatenus alium non vidit Lenni dominum quam Episcopum East-Anglorum. Illic primarium ejus municipium, illic sedes altera, illic cuneum. Hoc in Mint-len, illa in contiguo Gey-wood. Magnam illic & primariam Ecclesiam S. Margaretae dicatam sub Gulielmo Rufo struxit Herbertus de Losinga, qui Episcopatum transtulit de Thetfordia in Norwicum. Praetoem dedit Rex Johannes; à Joanne Graio, Episcopo Norwicensi, Villae domino (cum Regem hic lautissime excepisset) exoratus. Regis tamen non Officialem fore sed Episcopi; jurandumque novum Quaere de hoc (Spelmanni nota.) quotannis in curia seu praetorio Episcopi Gaywodensi, ubi aulam & egregiam molem Praesul iste suscitabat. Episcopo igitur in omnibus subaudiens, homo Episcopi nuncupatus est. Largitur Rex praeterea splendida privilegia, & à latere (ut ferunt) gladium suum; sed quo nomen ejus magis celebrant quam in aliis omnibus munificentiis, cyphum ex argento egregium, interius deauratum, & exterius encausto (quod miraberis) insolito, costisque ex auro solido illustratum. Piaculum ducunt merum non lectissimum ex hoc haurire: & hauriunt quidem, non libant; caduntque interea cypho plures quam ipso gladio (Dicam cum Martiali: Hic Scyphus est in quo misceri jussit amicis Largius 1 Rex Johannes filtus Henrici II. ut Achilles à Martiale Aeacides dicitur, quia ab Ae●●o oriundus. Matt. lib. ●. Epigr. 4. Henricides, & bibit ipse merum) quem ostendunt hodie, & à latere Regis Johannis traditum perhibent, Majori praeferendum: ego vero ut credam non adducor. Non enim Regis fuit, sed Episcopi municipium; nec Majorem statuit Rex Johannes sed Praepositum, quem Henricus III. in Majorem commutavit, cum Lenni cives in Insula Eliensi partes ejus contra pr●scriptos Barones, fidelius multo quam feliciter [tuebantur] & in Charta Regis Johannis qua id privilegii concederetur, nulla gladii mentio. Certe Henrici VIII. donum fuit, cum villam consecutus esset ab Episcopo. Novis enim eam ornans privilegiis, & Burgenses mutavit in Aldermannos; & gladium, (expressis in Charta verbis) Majori concessit praeferendum. Testatur ipsius gladii in capulo inscriptio. Dominium villae cum censu, vectigali & theolonio ad Episcopos spectabat; sed theolonii tertiam partem Comites Arundelii jure castri sui de Risinge vendicabant. Hanc cum aliquando Rogerus de Monte alto, Baro eximius, & jam castri dominus à Lennensibus postulasset; moeniis atque carcere interclusum tenent, donec relaxasset jus suum, juramentoque confirmasset, se nunquam super hoc aut inficias iturum, aut apud Regem conquesturum. Longae extant rei ambages in Fisci schedis, Anno ..... Edw. II. Sed & in ipsum municipii sui dominum, Norwicensem Episcopum, cervicem adeo erexerunt, ut jura aliquot quae super eis habuit dominii ratione, pauperibus Risingae Burgensibus (velut in ludibrium & conculcationem) elocavit. Incentivum prodere videtur haec Charta; quam ab alia pariter denotanda supposuimus: W. Dei gratia Episcopus Norwicensis, dilectis & fidelibus suis Johanni de Bedeford. Gilb. fil. Warin. & omnibus aliis probis hominibus suis Lenn. Excepto Eadmundo de Wasingham Majore nostro & fautoribus suis, salutem & Dei benedictionem. Sciatis quod cum nuper in die Sti. Stephani venissent ad nos apud Norwicum dictum Eadmundus Angerus de Rising & quatuor alii Burgenses tam ex parte nostra quam ex parte sua, villam nostram de Lenn peterent ad firmam sicut prius; Nos habito cum pluribus viris sapientibus consilio, tandem optulimus eis ut ipsi Eadmundus Angerus & duo alii ditiores villae reciperent villam illam ad firmam, viz. tali modo quod neminem talliarent, nec pauperes gravarent, nec alicui injuriam facerent. Quod quidem penitus refutaverunt, & Willielmum de Pinkebek ut Ballivum nostrum receperunt cum gratiarum actione. Et super hoc audivimus, quod (nescimus quorum ducti consilio) ipsum Willielmum ut Ballivum admittere recusantes ingressum Domorum nostrarum & Bothae nostrae denegaverunt eidem. Et ideo vobis mandamus quod in fide qua nobis tenemini, eidem Willielmo & Ballivo nostro sitis intendentes, & eidem ingressum & seisinam domorum nostrarum, Gwyldhallae, & Bothae nostrae habere faciatis sine omni dilatione, ut fidelitatem & discretionem vestram merito debeamus commendare. Datum apud Thefford III. Kalend. Januar. Pontisicatus nostri anno IU. Esculentis & poculentis ita a natura accommodatum, ut penarium Cereris atque Bacchi videatur. Ex parte enim ejus Orientali tanta incumbit vis frumenti, ovium, cuniculorum, & campestrium alatilium; & ex parte Occidentali, casei, butyri, boum, cygnorum, & palustrium volatilium; in viciniis, piscium hinc marinorum illinc sluvialium & recentium; ut vix in tota Britannia, forte & Europa, in consimili circuitu tanta habeatur eduliorum diversorum copia. 〈…〉. Lenno per Gaywodiam (de qua diximus) exeunti Ashwicken-Thoresbei prostat, domicilium dixerim an latibulum, nescio; sed splendido cinctum patrimonio, domino satis dispari dominatum. In recto quem faciunt angulo Isis & Congunus fluvii, e palustri solo assurgit, 〈◊〉. nomen inde deferens, Rising; & egesto ex immani fossae colle arduo in gyrum dato, castro insuper coronatur. Fosse species Gothica est, ut Procopius docet, Normannisque ideo usitata, genus à Gothis deducentibus. Licet enim Saxones castra sua, gyrata etiam fossa circumscripserint, angustiori tamen usi sunt, & minus depressa, sed majoris plerumque circumferentiae; qua & hos Romani superabant. Romani autem (ut Polybius refert & Vegetius) in oblongum, si pateretur locus, castrametebantur quadrum, fossaque 16. tantum muniebant pedum, praetenta anteriori lateri fossa alia quam loricam appellabant. Formam infra videris, cum de Brancaster tractaverimus. Ex his quae diximus, uniuscujusque populi, Romani, Saxonis, Dani, & Normanni deprehendas munimentum. Romanos apud Risinge aliquid habuisse praesidii, & loci monet opportunitas, littus procul nudum, portum juxta celebrem despicientis; & effossus in vicinia nummus Constantini magni inde pridem ad me allatus. Castri exterior fabrica, Norwicensem exprimit; tecto pariter & intestinis spoliata. Tribus in muro firmata turribus, quas trium maneriorum domini, viz. de Hunstanton, Wutton, & Ridon, feodali obsequio tuebantur. Municipium adeo vetus, ut originem ejus nesciant archiva Regia. Praetore gaudet, & binis olim in hebdomade mercatis; nundinisque in anno quolibet 15. dierum. Ab anno ..... duos misit ad Comitia regni Procuratores, quos Burgenses vocant. Vetus fuit Albeniorum, Comitum Arundeliae possessio, & in divisione amplissimi eorum patrimonii inter sorores Hugonis Comitis, in portionem cessit Roberti de Monte alto, Baronis limitanei. Robertus de Monte alto, qui ..... Reliqua desiderantur. Prisas hic vocat, jus capiendi annonam in villis circumjacentibus ad sustentationem castri, precium intra 40. dies reddentibus, ut Stat. An. 3. Edw. I. definitum est. Congham. Ad orientalem Risingae limitem (Mantua me miserum nimium vicina Cremonae) Congham adest, nomen a Conguno quem emittit fluviolo auspicata. Hic pars maxima nostri patrimonii, quam obtinuit olim Gulielmus Rusteng, qui sub Comite Arundeliae militans in terra sancta tempore Richardi I. Miles factus est ab eodem Comite, prout etiam— de Ingolsthorpe, & Andreas de Sharneburne. Hoc quippe seculo dominis licuit capitalibus clientes suos milites instituere, etiam Episcopis & Abbatibus. Sed Abbatibus prohibetur in Concilio [ 1 Vid. Eadmer. l. 3. & Malmesb. Lib. 1. de Gest. Pontif. Londinensi sub Anselmo Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi, An. 1102.] Ad Mallingham hinc proceditur, quam Robertus Mordant Prothonotarius Civilium Placitorum sub Henrico VIII. nuptiis tulit Barbarae, filiae & haeredis Johannis le Strange jurisconsulti, easdemque transmisit ad Pronepotem. Rougham Huc se adjungit Rougham, ab aevo Richardi II. Yelvertonorum sedes, e quibus Willielmus sub Henrico VI Christophorus sub Elizabetha, & Henricus hodie, Justitiarii claruere; hoc est, (ut avum taceam, qui & jurisconsultus fuit) filius pater, & tritavus. Sed Christophorus & Henricus in Northamptoniae consederunt Comitatu. Descripsi ante aliquot annos in Norfolciae tabula geographica circulum, duodecem habentem in semidiametro mille passus. Centrum posui in campis Roughamiaes, deprehendique sub illius ambitu fuisse 24. Monasteria, totidemque minorum nobilium domicilia. Simul in vigore omnia, cum ferale illud exiit de excindendis monasteriis Senatus-consultum. Domicilia ab iisdem familiis vel eatenus (puta 90. post excidium annos) possideri. Monasteria vero, ter, quater, quinquies, dominos cum familiis eructasse, nec reperiri hodie Monasterii sedem, quamvis uberem & amaenam unamquamque (nam, ut Abel, pinguia Deo sacrificabant majores nostri) qua una eademque familia nobilis est gavisa. Duas excipio, quarum altera non dum tertiam, altera ne secundam transiit generationem. Sed nec haec familiae alicujus habitatio; nec illa à gravissimis infortuniis unquam libera. Par in reliquis observatio; ut intelligas non inanes fuisse multiplices illas maledictiones raptoribus istorum à veteribus imprecatas; nominis vel familiae exstirpationem, patrimonii effusionem, lites & jurgia diuturna, infortunia saepe gravissima, saepe etiam capitale excidium. Numerosa praesto sunt exempla; sed hic aliud institutum. Babbingley. Sed recurrendum mihi est in occidentem ad Borealem, quem faciunt Isis & Congunus, angulum. Illic Babbingley, ubi S. Felix East-Anglorum Apostolus, circiter An. Dom. 630. à Dunmocco applicans, incolas imbuit Christiana fide, primamque hujus tractus Ecclesiam condidit, quae à posteris ejus dicata patrocinio, hodie S. Felicis appellatur. Rei memoriam etiam praedicant adjacentes Flitcham montes, Christianorum dicti, the Christian-hills; & in vicinia Flitcham, quasi Felix-ham, i. e. Felicis villa seu habitatio. Haec Coenobio ornabatur Monialium, quod ejus fundator Cellam statuit, ad Abbatiam S. Mariae Walsinghamiae pertinentem; dictaque ipsa est S. Maria de Fontibus, quod ab Oriente fontes ostendit aprico interdum meatu, interdum subterraneo ludentes. Habetur hic in campis quadrata area & leni conclusa fossa Mallobergium, quod incolae Flitcham-burgh nuncupant. Ibi olim, ut in Praetorio conveniri soliti sunt Centumvirales judices (the Freeholders' vocant) cum istius Centuriae seu Hundredi, tum & aliarum ad lites in Centuria emergentes dirimendas. Sic enim in Brevi quodam Gulielmi Rufi. Willielmus Rex Anglorum H. Camerario salutem. Facias convenire & considere tres Hundredos & dimidium apud Flicceham-burch propter terram illam de Holme, etc. Huc etiam convenire olim solebant Centenarii, ad Dominum Hundredi eligendum: & ex prisci moris vestigia huc annuatim hodie indicuntur Centenarii seu Hundredarii obsequium domino Hundredi (quem Sectam Hundredi vocant) praestituri. Progredienti versus Boream, Appleton, ubi splendidas aedes non ita pridem exstruxit Edovardus Paston; & Sandringham, ubi ab aevo Edw. III. Cobbarum succrevit familia, à laeva praeteritis ad Sharneburne descenditur. Hic Thokus quidam loci Dominus, a S. Felice conversus & baptizatus, secundam extruxit Ecclesiam, quam in honorem SS. Petri & Pauli Felix dedicavit. 〈…〉. Parvam siquidem, & (pro ratione illius aevi) ligneam; unde longo tempore Stock-chappel appellata est. Thoki deinceps haeres ex multis suscepta nepotibus, Edwino cuidam Dano Angliam venienti cum Canuto Rege An. Dom. 1014. desponsata est; Edwino Rex Canutus Snetesham dedit, & multa praedia de quibus postea, Sherburnamque uxoris patrimonium confirmavit. Hic ille omnibus pace atque otio fruitur, donec à Normannis ejectus est ex omnibus. 1 Will. Conq. non ●mres s●d pleresque Anglos e●haereda●it. Lib. Rams. Sect. 155. (Nota Spelmanni▪) Distribuente enim inter Commilitones Angliam Gulielmo Conquestore, & partes hic amplissimas Gulielmo de Albeneio, & Gulielmo de Warrenna concedente, ejecerunt illi quotquot vellent, & Edwinum pariter expulerunt. Conqueruntur pulsi & ejecti apud Regem, & (ut verbis utar MS. Cod●cis) dixerunt ei quod nunquam ante conquestum, nec in conquestu, nec post, fuerunt contra ipsum Regem in consilio vel auxilio, sed tenuerunt se in pace; & hoc parati fuerint probare quomodo ipse Rex vellet ordinare. Per quod idem Rex fecit inquiri per totam Angliam. Possedit praeterea Thokus quicquid jacet ab Occidente Sharnburniae, versus mare; deditque totum Ingulpho cuidam cum filia unica in matrimonium, qui de nomine suo villam ibi condidit Ingolsthorpe, ut refert MS. Liber cui fidem cedo, licet ego dictam putassem ab Ingol fluviolo, qui hic mare ingreditur. Ad fontem Ingolis habetur Netesham, i. e. villa vaccaria, hodie Snetsham, quam (ut diximus) Canutus dedit Edwino Dano; sed eripuit illi Gulielmus de Albeney Normannus; suaeque prosapiae Comitibus Arundeliae permansit, donee ex nuptiis unius haeredum ad Monte-altos transiit, & ab his per stirpem regiam ad duces Lancastriae. Nobile dominium & splendidis ornatum privilegiis; sed inter ignobiles jampridem distractum. Dedit etiam Canutus Edwino Dano planiciem ex parte Orientali Sneteshamiaes, ad senos incultam mille passus. Illic Edwinus in lapideo colle, quem seculi illius Latinastri Hogum pecosum appellabant, Stanehow condidit. Sedgeford A vado hic prope arundineo nomen ascivit Sedgeford, Ecclesiae S. Trinitatis Norwici olim collata: sed possessio nuper Johannis le Strange, cujus ego filiam primogenitam in matrimonium duxi; patrimonium vero (qua per fas aut nefas) sub puellarum abrasit socer infantia; suam inde pinguescens sobolem. Injuriae, longae sunt ambages. Transeo. Sedgfordia exeunti exurgit Promontorium S. Edmundi Regis & Martyris nobilissimi; qui ab Offa Rege East-Anglorum in regni adoptatus successionem, splendido navium & ministrorum apparatu, à Germania, huc in portum vicinum appulit, cui nomen eo tempore fuit Maiden-boure, i. e. thalamus virgins. Quis autem hic esset locus magna me tenuit dubitatio. Portum de Hecham exilem & obscurum censeo; nec Burneham satis laudabilem ad splendidum excipiendum navigium, quamvis naves illius seculi satis agnosco tenues. Lennum igitur in considerationem veniens, prae caeteris arridet; tum quod portus sit tractus istius eminentior, tum quod S. Margaretae virginis sacrarium esset & thalamus. Hanc enim Lennenses ex antiquo Divam coluere tutelarem; templi ejus custodes sunt, & in honorem ejus tria capita draconis, quem illa cruce armata triumphasse dicitur, singulo in ore singulis sauciata crucibus, pro insignibus gestant. Habeturque Emblema Virginis in sigillo suo publico, draconem cruce vulnerantis & conculcantis, cum hac circumscriptione Stat Margareta, draco fugit, in cruce laeta. Sanctus vero Edmundus à Maidenbore non longe progressus, villam condidit regalem Hunstanstone; quod Johannes 1 Stow p. 76. Pringtonus dulcedinem & potentiam interpretatur; moratusque illic per annum pene, Psalterium Davidis in Saxonico idiomate memoriter sategit recitare. Liber ipse à clientibus suis Monachis Buriensibus in ipsius honorem religiose custodiebatur, usque ad excidium Monasteriorum. Ab Hunstantonia perrexit Athelburgum, regnique anno 16. martyrio coronatus, Divorum ascribitur collegio; & in vertice Promontorii Hunstantoniensis capella splendida honorabatur. Pervenit deinceps haec villa Regia ad Alfricum, sub Canuto Rege Elmamensem Episcopum; qui eandem, cum Holme adjacente vicula (cujus Ecclesiam struxit Hen. Nottingham) Monasterio S. Edmundi Buriensis dono dedit. Sed deducta postea sub ingressu Normannorum, ad Albeneios jure feodali Extran●is vulgo le Strange ceditur, ob praesidium à 2. militibus faciendum in castro de Risinge. Longe itaque mansit apud Barones le Strange de Knoken; sed à Johanne Barone An. 9 Edw. I. confertur in Hamonem fratrem suum de se & haeredibus suis tenendum per ser.— E cujus prosapia illic hodie floret Hamo le Strange Equ. priscam familiam avitis ornans virtutibus, & (quod magis in precio) facultatum accessione. Cerere (ut Hiblen melle, croco Tmolum invidere taceam) luxuriat pars haec maritima, praesertim hordeo, ex quo vinum conficiunt Britannicum, vitis aemulum; Saxonibus antiquis bier (quod proprie hordeum significat) appellatum. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Graecis, qui hoc adeo capiebantur latice, ut in honorem ejus Byrtorum seu hordeaceorum festum instituere, à Constantinopolitanis usque ad Anastasium Imp. qui hoc sustulit, celebratum. Festum (inquam) sustulit Imperator Anastasius, laticis desiderium omnes non tollent Imperatores. At num Saxonibus Beire in usu? Bryton (inquam) seu potus hordeaceus, quem alio nomine eale, & à dulcedine Soth-eale appellabant: non noster iste lupulatus: nam cum hordeo lupulus ante medium regni Henrici VIII. nuptias non inierat. Ex illa vero die summo in honore lupulatum Bryton; quod (ut Graeci) Numen colimus, salutisque praedicamus donatorem. O funestam & infelicem salutem! Prima enim quae hic unquam pota fuit, in excidium transiit totius gentis. Cum Hengistum Saxonem ad auxilium induxisset Rex Britannus Vortiger, & hospes hospitem mutuis se exciperet convivationibus, Roëna Hengisti filia pernoctanti apud patrem Regi propinans ait, Was-hale. Rex loquelam non intelligens, quid dixisset, quaerit à circumstantibus; Responsum est potare eam salutem Regi; qui rei captus novitate, blanditias colit cum virgine, & brevi in uxorem ducit. Illa patris erudita technis, Proceres regni ad convivium vocat, ubi ex insidiis trucidantur omnes, & ad Saxones translatum regnum. Hic Branodunum (à Brano non procul fluvio, & duno pro monte) vulgo Brancaster, i. e. castrum ad Branum; pelagus à sinistris late spectat; à dextris longius ericeta. Recipiente se in orientem littore, Branodunum vetus, hodie Brancaster, ericeta longius, pontem juxta despiciens, Romani castri vallum exhibet, ad mensuram à Caesare datam (Bell. Gall. lib. 2.) Castra in altitudinem pedum 12. vallo, fossaque duodeviginti pedum munire jubet. ●ormam castri cum singulis suis dimens●on●●●s, ut ●omanam 2 Vide Veget. l. 3. c. 3. & Stewec. f. 259. plane agnoscas apposuimus. [In Codice MS. Sp●l●anni spatium va●uum relinquitur; ipsa castri figura desideratur.] Castri dimensiones ipsum ostendunt non tumultuarium fuisse, aut in transitu factum, sed legitimum & stativum, ad custodiam insuper totius littoris Borealis contra Saxonum irruptiones (quibus adeo expositum fuit ut Littus Saxonicum appellaretur) destinatum. E● nomen a Bran seu Brun & Burn fluviolo, & duno pro monte; quod etiam, ut berig & burg Saxonibus, oppidum alias significat. Bran vero & Brun confundi videas in Leofrici Anglo-Saxonis cognomine, qui alias Dominus de Brane, alias de Burne appellatus est, pater scilicet Herewardi. Stationem hic habuit sub Comite Littoris Saxonic● Praepositus equitum Dalmatarum cum sua vexillatione. Sed illud quaero, quorum tempore coeperit hoc Litus Saxonicum appellari, ejusque Praefectus, Comes Litoris Saxoni●i. Ferunt, inde nomen quod hic Comes litus tueretur contra saxons. Qui autem hoc? Num Britanniam infestarunt saxons, Romanis dominantibus. Certe non reperi. Pro derelicto autem habuerunt An. Dom. 446. cum ab Aetio Consule opem contra Scotos & Pictos, Valentiniano III. imperante, implorantes non 〈…〉 vero ante annum 449. non appellunt, nec tum quidem a V●●tigerno haud accersiti & Britannis. Ante hoc igitur tempus non videtur Saxonicum L●tus appellari. Quid ergo in Imperiorum notitia tanto proponuntur fastu Romani Magistratus in Britannia, Vicarius Britanniarum, Dux Britanniae, Comes Britanniae, Comes litor●s Saxonici, etc. cum insigni Praefectorum, Officialium, & ministrorum cat●rva, & apparatu? Suspicor; ut in Provinciale Ecclesiarum in Romana Cancellaria, Patriarchae, Archiepiscopi, Episcopi Suffraganei, hodie numerantur sub infidelibus; ut floruerunt olim sub Christianis. ●oc autem posito, male convenit ut Romani nomine uterentur sua ditione non enato: Provinciale siquidem priscas retinuit appellationes. Celebre igitur monumentum Notitiam Imperii, de cujus origine & antiquitate crebro contenditur, siquido constat sub exitu Valentiniani III. concinnatum fuisse, non exutis omnino Romanorum reliquiis, sed turgescente indies alluvione Saxonum; litus jam ideo nuncupari Saxonicum, & Praefectum ejus, Comitem Litoris Saxonici, qui sub Valentiniano I. superioribus paucis annis (Marcelino teste) Comes maritimi tractus appellatus est. Haec ad ambiguum enucleandum; ad me redeo. Pinguntur huic Comiti in Notitia pro insignibus oppida IX. quibus praesidebat in Insula (puta Britanniae) cum nominibus ascriptis: soil. unum in Sussexia; 5. in Cantio; 1. in Essexia; & 2. in Norfolcia, Branodunum, viz. & (de quo postea) Garienum. Merebant sub eo una legio, quae hoc tempore 1000 fere continebat pedites: seni Numeri forte 1200. pedites: & 2. ordines equitum, i. e. Dalmatarum, qui praesidinm hic agebant; & Stablesianorum, qui ad ostium Garieni, numero simul 200. vel hunc circiter. Sic tota ejus militia per 9 oppida seu stationes disposita, continebat plus minus 2200. pedites, & 200. equites. Dalmatae vero hi dicti sunt, quod e parte S●lavoniae quam Dalmatiam tunc appellabant, conscriberentur. Eorum insignia praebet, ut vides, 1 O●id. Ve●illa●. Comita. cap. 27. Notitia: colores vero ex antiquis MSS. sic expressit Pancirollus. Praeferunt (inquit) in alba parma duplicem argenteum globum, quorum primum minorem sex virides munitiones circumstant; alter 7. acutas cuspides emittit. Supra est quadrata tabella, quae unam legem duplici orbi Romano dari insinuat; prominentes mucrones caedem hostibus nunciant. Eruuntur hic saepe Romana numisinata; ad me etiam nonnulla delata, cum duobus aliquando vasculis aeneis seu capedunculis. Regiam autem villam ipsam (sic enim olim appellatam reperiri, & regalibus imbutam hodie privilegiis) Coenobio S. Benedicti Ramesiensi dedit Vulfgiva Comitissa, uxor Ailwini East-Anglorum Ducis, & totius Angliae Aldermannus (id est, Justitiarius) qui opulentissimum Ramesiae Monasterium fundavit sub An. Dom. 973. Burnham Brani ostio septemplex innititur Burnham; nomen inde (si Britannorum Bran, cum Saxonum Brun, Prun, & Burn confunderim) etiam deferens. Hoc autem isti pro torrente dixerunt: sed Gunterus (Austriades) ubi de Hayl-prun oppido Imperiali loquitur, hayl salutem exponit; prun vero fontem: eoque sensu, Fontem (inquit) liquere salutis. Portu claret & mercato; aliquando etiam Prioratu. Obtinuerunt hic olim è Warreniorum dono splendidum Calthorpii beneficium, dominorumque una symbolum auro & cyaneo tessellatum, quod trajectu distinctum armelino hodie gestant in clypeo; ut pro more veteris illius seculi patronum enuncient feodalem. Sic ut diximus Sharnburni Albeneiorum: & moris typum exhibuisse videtur apud 1 It. Cam. l. 1. cap. 12. Giraldum Cambrensem, sub Henrico I. Giraldus de Windesora, Constabularius Penbrochiensis, qui XV. armigeris arma Dominorum suorum cum feodis dedit, ipsosque statim militari cingulo decoravit. Habetur sub Edw. III. in quatuor illis armigeris pugnacissimi Baronis de Audeley recentius testimonium, sed nos aliud agimus. Transiit haec haereditas superiori seculo cum filia Philippi Calthorp Equitis ad Parkeros, à gente Baronum de Morley propagatos. Egeruntur hic secundum littus crebri monticuli; Saxonum & Danorum proculdubio sepulturae, (nam de Germanis Tacitus 2 Pag. 133. , Sepulchrum (inquit) cespes erigit) an & Romanorum, fossione dignoscendum. Hi mortui, cineres in urna condidere, aggestis desuper cespitibus; ut in exequiis Mezentii prodit Virgilius. Illi non cineres, sed cadaver integrum colle opprimebant. Tria vero exhibentur observanda. Primum, tractum hunc qui jam Cer●ris videatur thalamus, incultum tunc fuisse; nam in arvis sepelire mortuos, Gentium prohibuit superstitio; ut apud Ciceronem legas in fine Libri 3. de legibus. Secundum, Paganorum & Gentilium haec fuisse monumenta; Christiani enim more Judaeorum in fossa occultabant mortuos, licet à Saxonico berig, quod montem notat, nos hodie to bury dicimus, quasi monte tegere, ut Latini etiam tumulare. Tertium, Scenam hic fuisse Martis, clientumque ejus caemiterium, qui Branoduni & pro portu patriae ad castra juxta Creake & Holkham contra Danos militantes▪ occubuere. In campis enim de Creake haud Creake Holkham. procul à Coenobio, amplum erigitur sepimentum militare, Saxonici operis; à quo decurrens via regia, blood-gate, id est, sanguinea via, nuncupatur; cruenti illic proelii testimonium. Habetur & his partibus Ebuli herbae copia; Ebulum. quam velut è Danorum exortam sanguine, incolae Dane-blood vocant. Habentur & per loca in depresso littore arenarum tractus, marinos cohibentes fluctus, the Meals à farinae pulverisve similitudine (nam vox utrumque The Meals Miles, seu Mules. Walsingham. sonat à Suevico & Germanico Mul pro pulvere) appellati. Quarto à mare lapide, depressius in valle sedet Walsingham, illustri olim coenobio in honorem beatae Mariae Virginis celebrata. Penetrale illic parentum religione augustissimum, ad effigiem capellae Nazareth in terra Sancta, ubi Gabriel Angelus Deiparam Virginem salutavit. Conditum à Richolde vidua nobili, villae Domina, supra 400. annis ante excidium Monasteriorum cum in visione tertio ad hoc excitata esset ab ipsa diva, exemplum (ut ferunt) aedificii demonstrante, & miraculo postea fabricam erigente. Multos illic divinae potestatis radios effulfisse perhibent; sanatas omnes morborum species, nec obticent mortuos suscitatos. Hinc ab omni nostri orbis angulo celebris ad Divam Virginem Walsinghamiensem (Parathalassam vocat Erasmus) peregrinatio. Nec à vesana tantum plebecula, sed ad ipsis regni atque Sacerdotii potestatibus. Obtinuit fama celebris, me adhuc puero, Regem Angliae Henricum VIII. nudis pedibus à Bashamia ad praesentiam Virginis perrexisse; conceptisque votis, monile peringentis precii obtulisse. Forte ut leniret Divam, quam exciso cum coenobio Penetrali, extorrem brevi relegaturus erat. In ea quippe miram deprehendit bonitatis indolem, exigui memorem beneficii, & ingentium (ut numen decet) obliviosam injuriarum. Moriens igitur huic legavit testamento animam, si legatam recte collocaverint Executores; qui in alio, quod sciam, nihilo implerunt ejus testamentum. Beatissimae virginis imaginem Chels●iae delatam flammis dedit Monasteriorum excisor Cromwellius, Anno 30. ejusdem Henrici. Holl. p. 971. Relicta Walsinghamia, & villis in confinio croceos anhelantibus odores, 〈…〉. Bashamiaes sub illo tempore aedes condidit istius tractus illustrissimus Gulielmus Fermer, eques potens; e cujus jam familia ad Calthorpos nuptiis transiturae sunt. 〈…〉. Adjacet Fakenham, mercatorium, quod in sexto a mari lapide salinam olim praebuisse (ut testatur Liber Angliae Censualis) mirum opinaberis. 〈…〉. Illic ad Occidentem Rayneham, cujus sub Edw. IU. & Hen. VII. dominus suit Rogerus Townesend Eques primo Regiarum causarum (quem Attornatum vocant) Procurator, postmodum Civilium Placitorum Justitiarius. Ejus abnepos, homonymus animae & fortunae dives facultatibus, avitas sedes non tam novis aedibus, quam nova aedificandi fabrica magnifice illustravit. Wissingset. Nec procul Wissingset; quod Herbertus Bozun Normannus sub Gulielmo I. emeriti nomine suscipiens, longa nepotum serie, in hodiernum transfudit sobolem. Mil●h●m. Et in proximis Mileham, si non alio, cunis memorabile Edwardi Coke, summi nuper Angliae Justitiarii, Legum officinae conditoris, & quod ruptis ilibus fateantur aemuli, jurisprudentiae nostrae coryphaeus. Praedicabat miri quidpiam ejus genitura; matrem ita subdito juxta focum intercipiens, ut in thalamum cui suberat non moveretur. Locum ipsum ipse mihimet demonstravit. Elmham. Late hic ad Hieri ramum borealem distendit alas nobile dominium Elmham, quod usque patrum nostrorum memoriam secularem nunquam agnovit possessorem. Gentilium enim aevo Flaminis perhibetur habitatio, conversisque ad fidem a Felice Sigeberto Rege & Anglis Orientalibus in Episcopi transiit patrimonium, cujus sedes Dunwici fuit. Cum vero tres illic successissent a Felice Praesules; graveque videretur tantam plebem unius credi moderamini; divisa est parochia inter duos, relictaque alteri Suffolcia cum Dunwico civitate, alter sortitus est Norfolciam cum Elmhamia. Sederunt hic deinceps ante An. Dom. 1088. viginti tres Episcopi, a sede Elmhamenses nuncupati. Castellum praebuit in egesto colle, cui se recepisse dicitur Episcopus Norwicensis, cum excommunicationem, quam Innocentius IX. in Joannem Regem promulgaverat, edixisset, Regemque merito accendisset. A castello per cuniculum subterraneum in Ecclesiam itur ad altare; ubi sancti olim Episcopi jejuniis & assiduis orationibus incumbentes, Deum clam mortalibus invocabant. Ecclesiam condidit sub Gulielmo Juniore Herbertus de Losinga, primus Norwicensis Episcopus; vel collapsam potius à fundamentis credideris excitasse: sedem enim Episcopalem tot annis Ecclesià caruisse, nemo cogiter. Traditur hoc dominium cum reliquo Episcopatus patrimonio in permutationem, ut praefati sumus, Henrico Regi VIII. a Richardo Nix, Episcopo caeco, ut è laqueo quem inciderat semet liberaret. Rex acceptum D. Cromwello contulit funestum donum. Securi enim hic adimitur, & effuso postea integro patrimonio, pronepos ejus D. Coko ipsum venundavit, aerumnarum satis exin conscio. Gressenhall. Ad australem Hieri ramum Gressenhall assidet, nobilis olim Fstotevillorum habitatio, & clientes multos in obsequium habens militare per Foliotos ad Tho. Hastings, Baronis de Abergavenni fratrem, transiit. Ejus ortus à nepotibus Edwardus Hastinge (cum in hastiludio occisus esset An. Dom. ..... Laurentius Hastings Comes Pembrochiae) titulum Baronis de Hasting, & sine discerniculo insignia, coccineam scil. manicam in clypeo aureo, sibimet assumpsit. Gravissimas ideo lites cum de Grey Ruthino Barone legitimo è foemina haerede, tum in Curiis Civilibus tum in militari, per annos plurimos incredibili tuebatur pervicacia: nec victus demum & incarceratus succubuit, nec moriturus. Desiit vero ejus familia in Hugone Hasting; haereditate ad Extraneos & Brownos per filias transeunte. Nec silentio praetereundae Cley & Blackney, portus non inhospitales, adversis Euripi incumbentes faucibus: eo autem prior clarior, quod nautae ejus 1 Walsing. Ypod. p. 566. An. Dom. 1406. filium & haeredem Regis Scotorum, foederis causa ad Galliae Regem navigantem, interceperunt & Henrico IU. Regi Angliae munus aptatis●imum exhibuerunt. Melton. Jam in Boream reclinantibus, ad initium Buri fluminis habetur Melton, Constabulariorum aliquando sedes, & ex nuptiis ad Astleios veniere ..... edidit qui in illustri sub Henrico VI duello ..... Gallum in Gallia coram Gallis vicit, laborantemque famam suam emancipavit. Heydon. Burus tenui hinc procurrens filo, à dextra Heydon linquit, aliquando mercatorium. Sall. Et sal, ubi elegans Ecclesia, à Brusio (qua ex insculptis insignibus conjectare licet) villae domino & patrono, circa aetatem Henrici VI condita. Cancella vero aeque elegans à quodam Gulielmo Wode, Rectore Ecclesiae & Decretorum Baccala●reo à fundamentis struitur An. Dom. 1440. A Brusiis vero ad Townsendos, etc.— Repham Tria hic vicina mercatoria; Repham, tribus splendidis in uno coemiterio Ecclesiis splendidum; sed una jam diruta: Caston, ubi manus aenea (rationem non teneo) praefertur Dominii Senescallo: & qua Burus ponte jungitur▪ Ailesham, quod Ducatus Lancastriae apud nos praetorium est. Mirum hic in jure nostro; Manerium à manerio, & per virgam teneri ad voluntatem domini, & per copiam rotulorum Curiae concedi; Manerium scilicet de Sextons de manerio de Ailesham. Loquor in forensi dialecto: sed qui nescierit ipsa feoda militaria tenta olim fuisse & per virgam & ad voluntatem domini, legat si placeat quae de feodis in nostro Archaeologo disseruimus. Blickling. A laeva Blickling, Bolannorum aliquando sedes, è quibus orti sunt Thomas Bolen, Comes Wiltsh●riae, & Anna Bolen uxor Regis Henrici VIII. optimae Principis Divae Elizabethae mater, natalitium hic sortita. Cadente in fatum Jacobo Bolen avunculo Reginae Elizabethae, Blicklinga ex nuptiis ejus filiae & haeredis, ad Joannem Clere pervenit: cujus e filio nepos Edwardus, Ordinis S. Michaelis eques, eam vendidit Henrico Hobart I quiti, summo plebei Tribunalis Justitiario; qui aedes veteres insigni auctas impendio, familiae suae stationem posuit nobilissimam. Wichingham. Ab austro, non praeteream Wichingham, clarum olim Wichinghamiorum familia; è qua sub Edw. III. floruit clarissimus nominis illius Jurisconsultus; & Bretonum, non minus insigne celeberrimo illo Episcopo Herefordensi, qui sub Edw. I. Pandectum Juris nostri Regii concinnavit; quam facinore Joannis Breton sub Henrico III. vulgatissimo. Godofredus de Millers, Eques genere & militia clarus, concubitum ambit filiae Joannis Breton. Illa, patre consulto, noctem pangit, qua cubiculum Virginis eques clanculum subrepit; Captus vero ex insidiis gravissime primum vulneratur, deinde flagris caesus acerbissime per distentos ad trabem pedes tollitur, mortemque ardentius imprecanti abscisis membris virilibus, mutilatus est. 2 Mat. Par. An. 1248. Accidit & eodem tempore dapsili c●idam Clerico simile infortunium; sed commotus hisce Rex praeconia per provincias edixit voce, ne quis praesumat, nisi pro conjuge, adulterum membris mutilare genitalibus. Trans Burum in conspectu Blicklingae, pare velut distantia, habentur Calthorp, dictum à frigore; & Erpingham; viculae tenues & jam obscurae, sed felix utraque è celebris & antiquae familiae natalitiis. Illa Calthorpiorum, propaginem late distendentium; haec Epingamiorum fortiter dimicantium: è quibus unus fuit e XV. viris qui Henricum Ducem Lancastriae ab exilio ad regni molimina redeuntem, comitatus est: & qui Henrico V. in Agencortensi proelio fortissime dimicaturus, rudem ejecit, ineundae pugnae tesseram auspicatissimam. Baningham▪ Hic à latere Baningham, ubi Rex Henricus I. 5. marcatus terrae dedi● Gerardo Tasard tenendum de eo per Serjantiam balastriae (ut inquiunt schedae) i. e. arcubalistae. Baningham. Reflector paululum in occasum ad Berningham, à Berninghamis per Hethersetos ad Pagravos ducta: e quibus Johannes Pagrave Jurisconsultus aedificium recoluit & filio dimisit. Baconsthorp. Et Baconsthorp, ubi à Johanne Heidon Jurisconsulto sub Henrico VI. potenter excrescens Heidonorum familia, jam in deliquium regressa est. Gresham. Adjacet Gresham, nomen faciens ditissima exinde prosapiae; quod Thomas Gresham, Praetor Londinensis, & Regalis (ut vocant) excambii conditor, florere incoepit. ●●lbirg. Hinc in boream mari vicinior habetur Felbrig; nomen & sedem praestans vetustae & effaetae familiae Felbriggorum; è qua D. Simon de Felbrig, Eques inter nostrates celeberrimus connubio potitur Margaretae, filiae Ducis Thasae, Regis Bohemiae nepotis, è qua Alanam filiam & haeredem suscitavit, nuptam Gulielmo Tyndall, patri Thomae Tyndall, qui genuit Gulielmum Tyndall, ad creationem Arthuri Principis Walliae balteo cinctum militari, & jure Margaretae proaviae suae, haeredem regni Bohemiae denuntiatum. Sic Heraldorum nostrorum fasti; sic me puero fama celebris. Cromer. Gimmingham. Jam ad litus reversus, Cromer mercatorium Neptuno contritum inimico praetereo; Gimminghamiam accedens, Ducatus apud nos Lancastriae sedem primariam. Ingens illic aula columnis distincta, quarum ea olim ratio fuit, ut supra columnam suae conditioni designatam nemo ascenderet. Retinetur & prisci moris consuetudo: a colonis manerii quos Socmannos olim, hodie Ten●ntes in Soccagio vocamus, non tam censum pecuniarium quam opera rustica, & ad victum vestitumque pertinentia repetere. Moris ut Romanis insoliti, Tacitus meminit Cisalpinis omnibus in usu. Nobis vero mutavit primus Rex Henricus II. Bronholm. Nec procul in crepidine Promontorii Bronholmensis, Coenobiolum aliquando S. Sepulchri, à G. Glanvilla censu pauperi constitutum; sed ex cruce quae illic colebatur, auctius indies & per quam celebre. Liceat dicere de hàc, quid proditum. Factam sine dubio (ut asseritur) de ipsa cruce in qua pependit Dominus noster; ad longitudinem pene humanae manus, cum duplici ligno per transversum. Ferri solitam inter alias Reliquias à Patriarcha & Episcopis ante Baldewinum Imperatorem Constantinopolitanum (Flandriae prius Comitem) in aciem progressurum contra Crucis inimicos; neglectaque fortuito semel aliquando, caesum cum exercitu Imperatorem. Erat tunc Constantinopoli, Capellanus quidam Anglicus Divina inter alios celebrans in Capella Imperatoria, & reliquiarum agens custodiam; qui cum omnia desperata videret & perturbata, reliquias & pretiosa multa clam surripiens, Angliam venit; & quaedam Monacho S. Albani vendidit, quae Parisius 1 Mat. Par. An. 1223. in Henr▪ III. p. 307. fatetur, magna illic fuisse veneratione cum haec ipse scriberet, id est, An. Dom. 1223. Crucem vero nullis cederet Capellanus; qui & ipsum & duos filios suos parvulos in ordinem non susciperent Monachatus. Repudiata conditione à divitibus multis Monasteriis, ut fraudem suspicantibus; ad Bronholmiae devenit Prioratum, aedificiis & inopia jam tum laborantem. Pacta vero illic conditione Prior & Fratres suscipiunt Crucem, & in honestissimo Oratorii sui loco magna cum reverentia & laetitia collocant. Subsequitur mox miraculorum ingens fama, & non solum ex tota Anglia sed è longinquis regionibus huc concurritur. Coenobitis interea luculentus quaestus. Hujus meminit sub exitu quarti abhinc seculi 1 Fol. 17. Col. c. Galfridus Chaucer in Praepositi lasciva Fabula: And with the fall out of her sleep she braid, Help holy Cross of Bromholme she said. Paston. Waxham. Hic in littore una sedent Paston & Pastoni, Villa tenuis, gens ditissima. Legendo à Pastona littus occurrit Waxham, sedes Woodhousiorum familiae, ortu & insignibus ab illa Kimberleae discrepantis; sed clarae pariter. Hic Gulielmus Woodhouse Eques, Jacobo Regi nuper in facetiis, & familiae corruentis suscitator, primum apud nos instituit decipulum Anatarium, peregrino nomine a ●oye, i. e. cors, seu cavea nuncupatum. Stagnum siquidem valde latum est, sed parte una arundinibus septa, in angustiam porrectum. In hac angustia, nutriuntur indies anates aliquot proditionis causa mansuefactae, quae totam regionem circumvolantes, sui generis volatilia redeuntes ducunt catervatim in stagni latitudinem. Apparente jam tum caute in extremitate latitudinis stagni cane subdolo ad hoc edocto, secedunt volatilia remotius angustiam versus, prementeque adhuc cane, sed à longe, & in aquam alias semet immergendo alias furtim efferendo, capescunt tandem ipsam angustiam. Palam nunc exultat canis; eoque viso, sidunt aves proditoriae, & dum in alas se conjiciunt advenae, retibus obruuntur anatarii. Praedantur anno uno in hujusmodi decipulo, tot quot vaeniant aves mille coronatis Gallicis, & (ut audivimus) multo supra; in vicinorum grave admodum praejudicium, qui hoc modo & aucupii coërcentur voluptate & mensarum pristino supplemento. Germanis igitur superioribus capitale perhibetur, hoc erigere. Ad meridiem Walsham, & Worsted. Cowshil. Buri in margine, Cowshil est, cui inter privilegia indulsit Henricus III. ut servus qui hic per annum manserit, exiret liber. Frekenham. In adversa ripa Frekenham-hill, ubi Turnus Vice-Comitis toti annuatim indicitur Comitatui. Crostwick Vicinum Crostwick obtinet. Crassorum sedes, vulgo le Grosse, equestris sub Henrico III. familiae. Sprowston. Nec longe Sprowston, aedificiis à Joanne Corbet Jurisconsulto (Norwicensibus oriundo) adornatum, praediisque auctum à Milone Equite aurato, filio ejus: jam cum Milonis pronepote in tutela Regis est. Redeo ad Burum, qui depressas saepe planicies superfluens, nobiles multas edidit piscaturas, & Percarum genus celeberrimum. Memorabile est quod Randworth. ab accolis accepi: Ranworthae aliquando 120. modios piscium, duobus circumclusorum retibus, depraedari. Ludham. E regione sedet Ludham, ubi aedes non Episcopales, sed Episcopi Norwicensis in rure unicae. Officinam fuisse dicuntur agriculturae Abbatis S. Benedicti de Hulmo, vulgo Grangiam. Subest in palude tremula ruderum ejusdem Abbatiae moles ingens, quae ex insculptis insignibus sculpturam prodit recentiorem. Fundavit tamen eam Rex Canutus in honorem S. Benedicti, cujus ut apud Anglos ordo vetustissimus, S. Benne●▪ ita & regula gratissima & frequentissima. Tanta eam admiratione amplexus est fortissimus Monachatus propugnator Rex Eadgarus, ut cum Monasterio S. Aethelredae Eliensis, 2 Lib. Eliens. pag. 4. quod instaurabat Wintoniae Episcopus Ethelwoldus, 40. hydas terrae apud Hatfeld elargitus esset; nobile manerium de Sudburne addidit in Coronidem, sub conditione quod Ethelwoldus regulam S. Benedicti de Latino in Anglicum transmutaret. Acle. Festinans jam Burus ad Hueri confluvium, Acleam à dextris praeterlabitur, quam Ead●othus filius Goderici Abbatiae S. Benedicti Ramesiensis dedit. Flegg. A sinistris Flegg peninsula frumento dives & ubertate soli, primam excepisse videtur Danorum coloniam; tum quod portui cui appulerunt, sit vicinior, natur●●que munita beneficio; tum quod exiguo suo ambitu 13. villas comprehendit in by desinentes, voce Danica & villam seu habitationem significante. Hinc nos hodie a By-law dicimus, quod villa quaepiam sibi constituerit; seriptorib●● Dani●●s Bi-laginem, a by pro villa, & lage, quo nos (ut solemus▪ g in ● mutamus, pro lege. Yarmouth nee verum Garianonum, nec à vero alienum est. Sedes enim utrique ad ost●um fluvii Garienis, qui & utrique nomen indidit. Huic vero à canali vetere, illi a recentiore. Ambo autem in illo littoris spatio, quo An. Dom. 1 499. 〈◊〉 Stow p. 158. 495. Cerdicus Saxo cum Cinrico filio ejus & 5. navibus portum ingrediens, Britannos profligavit obvios, portuique nomen, Cerdicis oram, ut Aethelwerdus refert, dereliquit. Sub quarto inde lustro, Stuff & Wuthger pariter saevientes, hanc diripiunt regionis partem. Ambo autem in illo littoris spatio, quo sub Comite littoris Saxonici praesidium agebant Stablesiani equites; qui proprie suberant Magistro equitum in occidente Duces limitanei (Panc. p. 86. b.) Sed ut alii Magistrorum milites, alus Ducibus & Comitibus limitaneis merebantur: sic hi sub nostro. Erant vero sub hujus nomine vexillationes aliae plures, ut Stablesiani primi, secundi, tertii, Africani, Italicani, etc. sed an ab aliquo eorum nostri deferendi sint, an per se Britannicani appellandi, aliis linquo. Dicti omnes à loco unde orti sunt: & forte legendum putat Pancirollus p. 87. a. Stabaliani; qui fuere Galliae populi. Stablesianorum symbolum nescio an omnium, vel corum tantum, qui in Occidente sub Magistro Equitum militabantur, sic in Notitia Impp. describitur, & à Pancirollo qui in MSS. depictum vidit, enarratur, fol. 135. E veteris Garianoni exequiis succrevit novum, & ut maritum uxor fluvium sequitur exulantem. Longo tamen ut videtur intervallo. In appulsu enim Saxonum nulla hujus vel alterius mentio: sed in ipsa ora velut nuda & anonyma Cerdericus conscendisse fertur; nomenque inde, ut Aethelwerdus meminit, Cerdericshore imposuisse. Ut Venetiae in arenis maris Adriatici sedem sibi è ruinis Aquilegii eluctatae sunt; sic nova haec Jermutha nostra è deliquio vetustioris originem sumpsit & incrementum. Sita est enim in lacinia terrae, quae olim arenarum moles suit; ab Oriente, salso mari; ab Occidente, fluvio salso (vel ut Isthmus) latitudine interclusa; longitudine, 2000 passus non excedens. Quod miraberis tamen, aquis abique dulcibus exuperans. Mare exhibet Xerxianae classi satis fidam stationem, fluvius portum tutum proebet, qui 600. naves aequore suscipiat languescenti. Ora igitur Cerdici olim, & Saxonibus excip●endis commodissime exposita. Arenam obruisse fluvius dicitur usque ad Canuti Regis tempora, Annum circiter 1008. Cedente vero tunc mari, & arenis indies latius atque firmius semet efferentibus; conveniunt illic sub Edovardo Confessore & ingressu Normannorum, non tantum Norwicenses & vicini plurimi de Norfolcia Suffolciaque; sed Portuenses ipsi qui hoe aevo soli habebantur Angliae piscatores, Galli, Belgae, aliique peregrini artem exercentes piscatoriam. Halecum enim nobilissima hic Europae piscatura & Septembris exitu (quem cum Danis igitur Fish-month appellemus) per totos plerumque 40. dies, quod immunium illic hodie nundinarum spatium est; primumque papiliones & tuguria contra Jovem inimicum, sed ex licentia Regum, honestiora statim domicilia & ad fastum protinus exaedisicant. Tempore Gulielmi Rufi, Gulielmus Herbert Norwicensis Episcopus, (de Losinga, id est, mendax cognominatus) Capellam in hac arena condidit pro salute animarum illic appellentium: & post paucos annos, non longe à Capella, Ecclesiam perillustrem S. Nicolao dicatam, piscatorum vero ditata● oblationibus & dotatam. Hinc statio illa, Roda, (i. e. statio) S. Nicolai appellatur. Novae jam villae Rex Henricus I. anno regnis sui 9 Magistratum imponit, Regia functum authoritate, quem (de more Normannorum) le Provost, i. e. Praepositum appellabant. Et cum hoc sub regimine, centenos floruisset annos, Joannes Rex 18. Mar. regni sui 9 villam in Burgum, homines in Burgenses constituit, de Jermuth nuncupandos: & Burgum ipsum Burgensibus dunisit ad firmam (ut loquuntur) feodi in perpetuum. Ex concessione Henrici III. se muro claudunt & fossato, 100 jugera continentibus, A. D. 1230. & in An. 1240. gubernatur Burgus per Balivos suos. Edovardus I. & II. aquam illic nomine honestarunt Portus Jermuth, Tronumque & sigillum dictum Coquet pro oneratione & exoneratione navium instituerunt. Edovardus III. (qui hinc maris cognoscatur Dominus) Burgo locum in alto mari distantem 7. Leucas, vocatumque Kirkeley Roade univit in perpetuum; opibusque & potentia sic tunc Jermutha floruit, ut An. Dom. 1350. dicti regni 25. ad Caleti obsidionem 43. emisit naves & 1075. nautas; quod à nullo portu Angliae factum est si Fowensem excipias, qui licet quatuor naves plures exhibuit, nautas tamen 305. pauciores; Londinum ipsi 25. tantum naves & 419. [nautas] exhibente. Frequentia populi ex hoc dignoscitur, quod paulo ante in uno anno 1341. 7000. peste rapiuntur; cum sub initio Jacobi Regis 5000. tantum illic aestimarentur. Possidet quod sciam nullas hodie hoc (ut alia) municipium possessiones; sed instar filiorum Aeoli atque Thetidis (ut in Inquisitione 10. Henr. III. compertum est) maria & 4. ventos. Repetit quod deseruit mare; & cum aliquando Isthmus, quo situm est oppidum, ad sextum protenderetur lapidem, hodie in secundo terminatur; & ne vicinius proruat ingenti cohibetur ..... quae singulis annis, 560l. [f. resarcitur.] Retia illic Piscatoria Londinum à Jermutha, i. e. 100 mill. porriguntur; quod cum in Parliamento 35. Elizabethae palam audissem affirmatum, & ut certiar fierem, sciolum convenissem; respondit, Compertum fuisse, suffectura ea ad totum spatium inter Jermutham & Belgiam occupandum, dum ab una navi ad alteram (piscatorum more) jungerentur. Mirabiles quidem in nostris auribus; sed aestimata alias legimus ad 50000. libras Anglicanas. Veterem Garrianoni sedem oblivioni tradidit alveum destituens fluvius, sedisque & fluvii incerta vestigia. Videntur eam duo vendicare; Burgh-castle in agro Suffolciano, quod meridionali fluvii lateri hodie incumbit; & à Boreali 4. distans mille passus Castor villula. Romanam ostendunt ambo speciem; illud quadrilateram oblongam castrametationem muro coronatam, sed remotiorem à mari & loco paludibus & angustiis ita impedito, ut equestribus male conveniat turmis; haec in ipso litore, muri etiam & muniminis rudera prodens, campestri loco equitumque discursioni litoris praesidio quod huic Comiti, huic Equitatui demandatum fuit, commodissimo. Interiora enim & Mediterranea Comes alius tuebatur, peditumque magis cohortibus quam turmis Equitum. Garianonum igitur Castorem pono, Camdeno licet Burgh arrisit. Conducit in sententiam nostram, Castor, nomen à Romanis sumptum, praesertim cum in tota Anglia, nihil (quod sciam) hujus nominis reperietur non Romanum. Convenit & ipse locus, arenarum oppilationi & diversioni fluminis oportunior, ornithiis & Euro-Aquilone imperantibus. Orientem solem ulterius non videt Norfolcia: remeandum igitur ad Occidentem. E Yermutha exeuntes statim recipit Burgh-castle, ad Hieri marginem, sed in Suffolcia collocatum, quo nos igitur non commorabimur. Situm tamen dabimus & effigiem, ut Romanam fuisse intelligas: sed an Stablesianorum equitum statio, cum fluminibus & palustri impediretur solo, licet in acclivi castrum, non est verisimile. Si autem Cnoberi urbs fuit, & Monasterium (de quo Beda l. 13. c. 19) à Judaeis postea habitatum tradunt incolae, & fidem auget, ejus ducens ad introitum via antiqua, Judaeorum hodie appellata. Tenebat aliquando hoc castrum Radulfus filius Rogeri de Burgo per Serjantiam; quam cum dimisisset Gilberto de Weseham, & ille Regi Henrico III. eandem dedidisset, Rex 20. Aprilis, regni sui 20. coenobio S. Andreae de Bromholme, cum omnibus adjacentiis conferebat. Ad Hieri cum Wavenio coitum, tertio à Yermutha miliari, è paludibus 〈…〉 vix se erigit Reedham villula, Barneorum sedes, ab arundineo situ nuncupata, sed miraculoso Lothbroci nobilis Dani appulsu aeque celebris, at infelix. Lugubrem suscitabo narrationem. Lothbrocus hic à stirpe regia, cum duos genuisset filios, Hinguarem atque Hubbam, & solus aliquando in navicula, aves per vicinas Daniae insulas, cum accipitre depraedaretur, correptus est subita tempestate per maris latitudinem, & in Hieri ostium usque Reedham deportatur. Peregrinum incolae (ut invenerant) solum cum accipitre Eadmundo Regi East-Auglorum, cujus ad decimum inde lapidem erat Castor Regia, detulerunt. Formam & fortunam viri Rex miratur, vultuque & moribus adeo serenis excipit, ut Lothbrocus subito patriae desiderio non teneretur. Capitur & aulicorum studiis, praesertim venatorio; quo ut fiat peritior, Berno se adjungit venatori Regio, Magistrumque sic brevi superat; ut invidia percitus, hunc ille inter nemora seductum clam peremerit. Desiderato Lothbroco, canis quem alerat leporarius interfecti corpus vigil tuebatur, sed coactus fame alias atque alias Aulam petit: observatusque à ministris Regis, subsequentes ducit ad interfecti corpus. Bernus sceleris reus agitur, & judicio Curiae, Regis Lothbroci imponitur naviculae, solus & sine omni instrumento nautico; fluctibusque & ventis creditus, Daniam fato advectus est. Cognita illic navicula, tormentis arguitur de Lothbroci nece; & se ut liberet, interfectum mentitur ab Eadmundo Rege East-Anglorum. Saevissimam jurant Hingar & Hubba ultionem, collectoque 20000. armatorum exercitu, ductore Berno, totam East-Angliam ex improviso diripiunt. Eadmundum Regem brevi capiunt, flagris caedunt, confossumque deinde sagittis, & gladio detruncatum, inter Divos referendum excarnificant. Sic cum Rege animam efflavit regnum East-Anglorum, An. gratiae, 870. die. 12. Calend. Decembris, quae Eadmundo hactenus celebratur in Calendario. Ex his videtur Reedham villam hanc parvam, magna Yarmutha antiquiorem esse. Nam si habitatoribus frueretur Yermutha, cum Lothbrocus huc appulsus est, opem proculdubio clamore implorasset, attritusque fame & itinere, ulterius non perrexisset in fluvio. Decurrit hinc fluviolus ad Romanam alteram munitionem, sed an Ventam illam Icenorum, qua nihil olim apud nos illustrius, ego subito non definiam. Mirum enim videatur & inconsultum, magni celebrisque populi metropolim ad ignobilem collocari fluvium, cum in viciniis ipsis haberetur aliud nobilissimum. Hinc inter Waveney & Hierum nihil quod sciam memorabile, donec sub 〈…〉 10. pene lapide ad Hales venieris; ubi Jacobus Hobart, Henrici VII. Attornatus pluribus familiis initium dedit. Haileston Pari distantia Waveneium occupat mercatorium Haileston. Ind in Septentrionem Shelton rediens, per Shelton, quod antiquos suae appellationis dominos nuper Tasburg. exuit, ad Tasburg itur. 〈…〉 In Wenti & Hieri commissura, & Wento magis quam Hiero Norwich assidet. A north dictum quod boreale, & wic quod castellum, vicum, portum, sinum seu anfractum fluvialem, Saxonibus nostris significabat. Convenit igitur, quamcunque elegeris significationem; sed non aeque omnis. Si de sinu dixeris, urbs non in sinu fluvii sed in dorso ponitur, nec ad partem quidem borealem sed occiduam magis, unde & Westwich potius quam Norwich diceretur. Saxo ipse Alfricus nostras, Wic exponit de castello, & huc nihil accommodatius. Effecit enim ipsa ratio, ut Castellum boreale diceretur; cum ad tertium inde milliare versus ipsum Austrum, aliud haberetur castrum regium, quod, extinctum hodie, Caster tamen appellatur. 〈…〉 S● a castro igitur nomen urbis, castrum nomine proculdubio est antiquius; & forte ipsa urbe, quod in ejus habeatur meditullio. Sic Roma Capitolium. Licet enim fossam propter formam orbicularem & immanem amplitudinem, Danorum censeam vel Normannorum opus, arcem utique Normannorum; castrum tamen ab antiquiori seculo illic exstitisse, & nomen suggerit, & Charta quaedam Henrici I. qua enixius ab Harvaeo, primo Eliensi Episcopo [rogatus,] Ecclesiam illam liberam facit de jugo servitutis, & custodia, quam castello Norwici debebat. Imponi non poterat ista servitus, dum ab Episcopis, Monachis aut Monialibus possiderentur terrae Ecclesiae, si prius non fuisset debita; ideoque debitam fuisse dum in secularium exstiterunt manibus (i. e. Tomberti Australium Gerviorum Principis, qui Aethelredae uxori suae, primae Eliensis Monasterii fundatrici, circiter An. Dom. 677. eas dedit) necesse est. In Ecclesiasticorum enim dum erant possessione, magis (inquiunt LL. Edw. Confess.) in Ecclesiae confidebant orationibus, quam in armorum defensionibus. Ca 11. Amplum etiam fuisse Norwici castrum ante Normannorum ingressum, ex eo liquet, quod in Domesdei legitur Ibidem LXXXI. mansurae vacuae in occupatione castelli. Nobile etiam tune fuisse videtur hoc Norwici castrum, & velut totius Icenorum Provinciae metropolis, cui insignis ille Geruiorum Princeps, & tam insignis Insulae illius pars (si non tota) deservirent. Primo etiam ad East-Anglorum Reges, postea Praesides, quos alias Aldermannos, alias Duces, alias Comites appellabant, pertinuisse. In instauratione igitur Monasterii, Aetheldreda fratris sui Adulphi Regis East-Anglorum opem implorat: & in translatione Monachorum inde Betrichswordiam, sub Canuto Rege, An. Dom. 1020. idem facit Leofinus Abbas à Turchillo Comite. Quonam olim frueretur nomine, non me torqueo. Proculdubio vel Saxonico Norƿic; vel (quod Camdenus cedit) Britannico Caer Guntum; vel (ut Lhuydus habet) Caer guynt. In Historiis (fateor) raro occurrit vox alterutra: rarius quippe ipsae historiae. Caer Guntum vero quasi Wentopolis, i. e. civitas ad Guntum fluvium (quem saxons more suo G. in W. mutantes, Wentum pro Wuntum dicunt, Romani Ventam.) Diceretur aeque & Hieropolis, ab Hiero fluvio. Sed quaeritur an haec Venta illa Icenorum apud veteres & Antoninum? Negaveris forte & affirmaveris in aequilibrio. Cossey. A Norwico per adversum flumen ad Cossey remigatur; ubi junior sed clara Jerneghamiorum familia sedem obtinet luculentam; primogenita illa quae ad Somerle-town in Lothingland Suffolciae non pridem flourit, jam extincta. Bouthorpe. Prope hic ad Austrum, Wenti sinum alium videas Norwicensi similam: cujus cum in dorso pendeat, ut Norwicus, villula, non à sinu nomen habet, sed à dorso, Bouthorpe, quasi à bout, i. ambitu, & thorpe, villula. Intwood. Kettringham. Ab hoc sinu per Intwood quod Greshamos excussit nuper, ad Kettringham contenditur, Heveninghamorum sedem, numerosum Equitum seriem proferentium. Windham. Late hic in centuria (quae à 4. montibus, ubi convocari solet, nuncupatur Forehow) distendit alas Wimundham, vulgo Windham. Albeneiorum, Comitumque Arundeliae, eorumque haeredum, subinde ab ingressu Normannorum opulenta possessio, donec à Knevettis ad Henricum Hobart, Capitalem Justitiarium Civilium Placitorum, venditione devenit. Coenobio claruit Nigrorum Monachorum, à Gulielmo de Albeneio pincerna Regis Henrici I. condito, Sanctoque Albano primitus ascripto: coenobium vero, crebris Albeneiorum, Comitumque aliquot Arundeliae sepulturis; ubi de Fundatore hoc Epitaphium Hunc Pincerna locum fundavit, & hic jacet; illa Quae dedit huic domui, jam sine fine tenet. Hengham Huic radios Hengham porrigit; ubi Rex Aethelstanus 60. Hydas, i. e. carucatas terrae Aethelwoldo dedit, Episcopo Wintoniensi, qui easdem cum Eadgaro Rege mox post annum 970. commutavit pro 40. hydis & dimidio in Insula Ely & adjacentibus; cum jurisdictione & immunitate 7. Centuriarum & dimidiae, quae hodie S. Aethelred s Liberty appellatur. Mercatorium est, & suos habuit Barones; sed clarius nomen à Radulpho de Hengham. Kymb●●ly. A dextris Kimberley egregiis adornatur Woodhousorum aedibus, a Johanne Woodhouse equite nascentium. A●●ilburgh A sinistris dum in meridiem tend●●us, merito nos moratur Attilburgh; ut sopitam ejus dignitatem suscitemus. Atque id in primis moneo: Nusquam occurrit appellatio burgi, nihil innuens antiqui inuniminis; puta urbem, castrum, turrim, vallum, sepimentum●e militare: majori autem, qua apud nos frequenter deprehenditur, Castrum; Vrbem, Civitatem. Recte igitur Littletonus, Quae hodie (inquit) civitates, olim dicebantur burgi. Nec pro civitate, alia pro veteres nostros Saxonas seu recentes Germanos appellatio. Perhibetur celebri fama Attilburgum non solum fuisse civitatem, sed & aliquando Regiam & Provinciae Metropolim. Famae non deest antiquae paginae testimonium▪ si Joanni de Bramis (Waldei Historiae ante 200. annos authori) stet, (quod penitus non faciam.) Refert Joh. Bramis, Atlynge quendam, Norfolciae Regem (qui sub ..... Christi seculo floruit) in defensionem suam eam condidisse adversus Rond, Thetfordiae Regem, muro etiam cinxisse atque fossa, & quatuor portis, quatuor turres addidisse. Ductum insuper a conditore nomen. De auctoris fide non digladiabor. Monachus fuit Thetfordiensis, & historiam transtulisse refert, tum ex exemplari Gallico, tum & Anglico, verbis laborante utroque interdum exoletis: sed & Gallicum, pro genio seculi & illius populi multa invexisse. 〈…〉. In confiniis Attilburgi, villulam optimam (sic Besthorp sonat) proavorum sedem habitat eques primarius— Et jam in tractum pervenitur, sylvis divitem atque pascuis, quo primas obtinet Boccinum, oppidum vetus, ad Bu●k●nham▪ I●idem fluvium (ut Lelandus ponit) situm; & nunc Buckenham, non à fagis (ut Camdeno visum) quae in tota hac Provincia nusquam (quod sciam) reperiuntur, sed a cervorum copia (quibus ut circumfusa n●mora olim abundarent, ita neque hodie destituta sunt) nomen habet. Nam hos item Dani atque saxons Bucken vocant. Pinguior autem ista Comitatus portio, cum villis plurimis adjacentibus, & officio Pincernae Regii, Gulielmo Albeneio à Conquestore data perhibetur, castrumque ille Buckenhamiae condidisse; cum tamen in excisenda patria nostra inter Normannos nulla ejus mentio fiat in libro Censuali, qui Domesdei nuncupatur. Quandocunque autem facta fuerit haec donatio; certum est & fieri aliquando, crevisseque ejus posteros in Comites Arundeliae; sed deficiente sub Henrico III. haerede masculo, insignis haec haereditas inter foeminas dispartita est: cessitque jam castellum de Buckenham cum nobilissimo mancrio Wimondham inter alia multa per Tatsallos, Calios, Cliftonos, ad Knevettorum prosapiam, e qua hodie Philippus Knivet Baronetti gaudet novo titulo; sed patrimonium vetus adeo labefactavit, ut vix Buckenham cum castello r●maneant integre. Keninghal 〈◊〉. Inter villas plurimas quas Keninghal hic trahit in suam ditionem, subest ad Austrum Garbusham, alias Garbelsham, & Garbolisham, quod Wilfricus Abbas sextus Eliensis, antequam Ecclesia illa in Episcopatum eveheretur, Gudmundo fratri suo inter alia cessit, ad vitae spacium. Sed direpta interea à Normannis Anglia, Hugo de Munford miles Normannicus, haec & caetera cum à Gudmundo tum a Monasterio in perpetuum abrasit. Cito vero transiit Garbulsham▪ ut videtur) ad dominos villae Keninghal, cujus in vestibulo jacet. Amplum enim hoc, & sedes olim potentissimorum Baronum. Lopham 〈…〉. Hic limen Norfolciae tuetur Lopham è cujus latere velut ab eodem alvo enascentes discordes fratres, Isis minor & Waveney, fluvii, contrariis alveis hic per Dille in oriente Garienum petit, ille per Thetford in Occidente Lennum Regis; suo ambitu totum Norfolciae australe Hemisphaerium complectentes. Thetford Thetfordiam (antique Tedford) dici à supposititio fluminis nomine Thet vel Sit, vix assentior. Saxonibus liquido sonat vadum populi, ðeod enim populus, ƿord vadum. Fuisse tamen Antonini Sitomagum non inficior; male licet de intervallo convenit à Venta Icenorum; vetustamque admodum, ut caetera omnia in magus (quod urbem sonat) desinentia. In antiquae tabulae fragmentis Simomagus, alias Sinomagus; quod utrumque mihi Icenorum urbem velut primariam olim, & metropolin tractus istius fuisse suggerit. Prior enim vox Simomagus Ptolemaeo quadrat, qui Icenos vocat Simenos: & vox posterior Sinomagus dicit qu. Icenomagus. Nec Caesari dissonat, qui Icenos (juxta Camdeni lectionem) Cenos vocat, ut alii Hispanos, Spanos. In historiis autem non omnino sonuit Sitomagus nomen; nec ante Saxones recentiores Tedford ipsum; nec Jo. Brami Monacho adhibueris aurem de Rondo quodam strenuo istius urbis Rege, vicinisque infestissimo, memoranti. Floruisse eum refert Vortigerni seculo, torpentibus & cedentibus jam Romanis, grassantibus Pictis & Scotis, enervatis Britannis, Saxonibusque cumulatim irruentibus. Sic ut de Britannia jam dicamus, ut de Israel olim, Nullus jam Rex in Israel. Occupanti enim omnia jam ceduntur, & ubique tot Toparchae, (quos Scriptores veteres appellabant Reges) quot tyranni, munita possidentes oppida vel territoria. Praedones siquidem non Reges; de quibus recte Porphyrius impius apud Ninnium; Britannia fertilis provincia tyrannorum. Brit. pa. 36. Fertur & ex historia anonyma fuisse olim scholasticorum studium Thetfordiae (Caius, p. 148. & fidem astruit ipse Beda, lib. 3. c. 18. de Sigeberto ita loquens: Patriam reversus, ubi regno potitus est, mox ea quae in Galliis bene disposita videt, imitari cupiens, instituit scholam, in qua pueri literis erudirentur. Nollem fraudi esse Cantabrigiae, quae locum hunc ad suam trahit Academiam; priorem tamen agnoscit ipse Caius— Egregia olim schola è plebeis; cum per aliquot secula ex edicto Gregoriano prohiberentur Angli gymnasia celebrare propter Arianam & Pelagianam haeresim, aliosque quosdam Britannorum errores. V. Caium. Veteres urbis aerumnas hodie praedicant fossae vicinae militares, egestumque plurimo cespite propugnaculum; Danorum potius quam Saxonum opus: proculdubio non Romanorum, qui nec tanta elatione nec tam exiguo ambitu castra metabantur. Hanc, è Northymbria regressi (Anno circiter 870.) Hungar & Hubba, Danorum occupant conductores truculentissimi. Quibus dum congreditur Orientalis nostrae Angliae Rex piissimus Eadmundus, in fugam est coactus, obsessusque in castello de Foamingham, demum capitur, sagittisque, arbori alligatus, transfixus, & truncatus capite: decerptumque deinceps regnum ejus ad Occidentales Saxones est delatum. (Vid. Holl. & Hunt.) Sub ingressu Normannorum, Arfastus, Capellanus Gulielmi I. & jam tractus hujus Pontifex, Episcopalem sedem ab Helmhamia transtulit Thetfordiam quod ab antiquo municipium esset Episcopatus sui, & jam cautum esset Concilio, ut Episcopi sedes suas non in villis, sed in urbibus collocarent. Secundus vero successor ejus, Herbertus de Losinga, Norwicum detulit. Apud Episcopos tamen Norwicenses annos totos 500 mansit Thetfordiae dominium. Cum vero sub Henrico VIII. Ricardus Nixus Episcopus incidit in crimen diminutae Regiae potestatis (quod Praemunire vocant) bonisque omnibus & perpetuo carcere mulctandus esset; gratiam ut redintigraret, universa Episcopatus praedia (viz. 30. vel supra, eximia maneria) in Regis patrimonium transcripsit: acceptis (Glauci & Diomedis permutatione) Abbatia S. Benedicti de Hulmo cum suis, aliisque nonnullis praediis. Quae ut certius, annecterentur Episcopatui, decreto Parlamentario anni 27. Henr. VIII. sancitum est, ut Episcopus Norwicensis semper Abbas S. Benedicti de Hulmo habeatur, & e contra Abbas S. Benedicti de Hulmo semper utique Episcopus Norwicensis: Sic unus hodie nobis Abbas. Sed quoniam mentionem fecimus tantae cladis nobilissimi istius Episcopatus, casum referam, quo Regi tam obnoxius fit Episcopus. Anno 25. Henrici VIII. Regiarum causarum Procurator Billam quam vocant de Praemunire exhibuit in Banco Regis versus Episcopum Norwicensem (nomine Richardum Nix) tune in custodia Marescalli existentem. Billa quae di●itur Indictamenti, suit hujusmodi. Quod in villa Thetfordiae in Comitatu Norfolciae, ultra hominum memoriam, consuetudo extiterat; ut causa omnes ●●●l●siasticae in eadem emergentes villa, coram Decano villae ejusdem, qui ibidem peculiar●m habuit jurisdictionem, terminarentur: & quod nullus extra dictam villam in placitum traheretur in aliquam aliam Curiam Christianam pro causis Ecclesiasti●is, nisi coram eodem Decano: & si aliquis contra dictam consuetudinem tractus esset in placitum coram aliquo alio judice Ecclesiastico, & hoc praesentatum for●t coram Majori ejusdem villae, delinquens ille forisfaceret VI sol. VII. den. Et quod quidam N. sectam prosequebatur in consistorio dicti I piscopis, pro re exorta infra dictam villam Thetfordiae, & praesentatum hoc fuit coram Majore, & quod ipse pro delicto isto forisfaceret VI sol. VIII. den. Ob hoc Episcopus Majorem citat generaliter pro salute animae ad comparendum coram semetipso in aedibus suis Hoxomi●, in Comitatu Suffolciae: & apparente eo, tanquam per libellum, questus ●st ore-tenus de praedi●ta materia, injunxitque eidem sub poena excommunicationis, ut quod praesentatum fuit, adnihilaret. Episcopus petit at Consilium ●ruditum (sic Advocatos vocant) sibi assignaretur: & hi assecunt ●●m id quod praesentatum fuit, tum & ipsam consuetudinem vacnam 〈◊〉 propterea non posse dici contra coronam & dignitatem regiam; nec 〈◊〉 tractum esse ad Episcopum ad aliud examen: quod in nulla Curia exa●●ari deberet. 2●. Curia Episcopi non intelligitur fore inf●a Stat. 16. Ric. II. sed in Curia Romana aut alibi, debet intelligi, extra regnum. Sed resolutum fuit per Fitz James Capitalem Justitiarium & totam Curiam; quod, sitne consuetudo, sive id quod praesentatum est legitimum vel non; res, temporalis est & à lege communi determinabilis, non in Curia spirituali: & Episcopum igitur incidisse in crimen de Praemunire. 2●. Quod verbum alibi, extendit tum ad Curias Episcopi, tum & alias Curias ●cclesiasticas infra regnum, & saepius ita judicatum esse per Curiam. Tune Episcopus indictamentum confessus est, & super hoc, Port secundus Justi●iar●●s judicium versus eum protulit: quod esset extra protectionem Regis, & quod bona & catalla ejus Regi essent forisfacta, corpusque ejus car●●ri mancipandum ●squ●quo placu●rit Regi. De Episcopatu plura aliquot. Eum instituit S. Felix Burgundus, adductus a Sigeberto, East-Anglorum Regum primo Christiano; ut populo suo Apostolus sor●t. Sedem posuit Dunmoci in Suffolcia. Sed post tertium succ●ssor●m divisus est Episcopatus in duas di●●ces●s: alt●ra cum 11. Episcopis Dunwi●i permanente, altera cum 12. Elmhamiaes in Norfolcia collocata. Direpta jam a Danis tota regione, diu vacua ●●●sit utraque dioecesis; sed coal●sc●nt● sub Edwino Rege, Anno scilic●t 955. sede Elmhamiae fruuntur 12. alii Episcopi. Hic Arfastus vero dec●●us tertius, Thetfordiam transtulit sub Guli●lmo I. & qui post alterum successit ei Herbert●s de Losinga, Norwicum usque; ubi praediis (ut di●imus) antiquis viduata; hodie novis fruitur. Tenu●runt autem Episcopi veteres Baroniam suam, 5. melitum s●odis; quibus jam Regi devolutis, quaero quonam fulcimine Baronia nititur, & quonam titulo Parliamentaria ingreditur Episcopus Comitia? Inter caetera Nobilitatis monumenta; celebris olim fuit haec urbecula solio Regum East-Anglorum, Episcopali Cathedra, & octo praeterea Monaster●s, quod ne● in primaria ulla reperitur civitate, nec in tantillo ambitu, n● ipsomet Londmo; adeo ut vel nostram dixeris 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, vel ex merito Mona●●opolin. In responsion● vero quam dedit Norfolciae Vice-Com●s Brevi Regis Edouardi I anno regni ejus 9 emanenti, quo se fieri certior●m Rex p●aecepit, Quot civitates, burgi, & villae essent in hoc Comitatu▪ unica ●an●um memoratur civitas, Norwicus scilicet; & duo pariter burgi, h. e. Jaremutha magna & villa Lenn-Episcopi: nulla de Thetfordia mentione, quantacunque celebri vetustate. Proculdubio quod jam burgi tantum essent habiti, qui Procuratores in regni emitterent Comitia seu Parliamenta: & Thetfordiensibus non indulta est haec gratia ante annum— quatenus è schedis liqueat Parliamentariis. Inter Coenobitas qui hic floruere, Joannes Bramis Waldei historiam è veteribus Anglico & Gallico exemplaribus latine concinnavit, quod in MS. Codice Collegii Corporis Christi Cantabrigiae sic exponitur, De Thetford Monachis Bramis edidit ista Joannes. Nec taceam nobile illud monumentum nostrum, quod à senorum dierum creatione, Hexameron (cum illo S. Ambrosii) inscribitur, à Monacho etiam Thetfordiensi, 300. hinc annis (ut scriptura suadeat) conditum perhiberi. Carmine, fateor, satis impolito, & pro genio seculi, leonino; egregia vero solertiâ & amplo volumine, rerumque cognitione multiplicium (ne Bartassus primus dicatur hunc induisse cothurnum) refertissimum. Addam Prologi ejus exordium; ut nostrum sciat Manuscriptum, qui in similem Codicem in ciderit: Omnia disponens, nusquam metam sibi ponens Virtus divina, stabilis manet absque ruina. Sacrum pneuma quidem, genitor genitus, Deus id●m Fons, vitae munus, numero sine, trinus & unus, etc. Breclys. A Thetfordia in Boream redeunti velut ad septimum lapidem, Breclis occurrit, exoletae Breclesiorum familiae sedes, quam sub Anglo-Normannorum seculo, Willielmus de Warenna, Comes Sussexiae & Surriae, Thomae dedit filio Godfridi, filio Alberti Francigenae, cum pluribus aliis Burnhamiaes, Grimstoniae, etc. praediis, quae per faemineam haeredem ad Cumptonos aliosque transiêre. Tulit nobilis olim haec familia in feodali clypeo dominorum suorum Comitum de Warenna Symbolum, cianeo colore in distinctionem in nigrum verso: hoc est, aream tessellatam (cheque vocant) ex auro & nigro; ut de Calthorpis utique supra memoravimus. Ellingham. Woodrising. Haud procul Ellingham: & hic à latere Woodrising, Southwellorum amplissimae samiliae (è qua Ricardus Reginae Mariae è consiliis claruit) speciosa pariter & spatiosa habitatio. Carbrook Huic se adjungit Carbrooke, ubi militum S. Joannis Hierosolymitani Prioratus fuit, plurimis per hanc provinciam ditatus praediis & clientibus feodalibus. Qui cum amplissimis illius ordinis gauderent privilegiis, crucis symbolum domibus suis vicatim apponebant, ut sic ab aliis eorum innotesceret immunitas. Hoc autem cum multi alii olim factitarent, ut sub iisdem delitescerent immunitatibus, statutum An. 13. Edw. I. Westm. 2. ca 13. ut praedia illa quibus falso appingerentur ejusmodi cruces, in domini feodalis transirent patrimonium. Watton. Merton. Hinc per Watton mercatorium, ad Merton itur; quod à lacu nomen habet; decus autem à splendidis aedibus, quas illic nuper exstruxit Gulielmus Grey, probitate & prosapia eques splendidus. Northwold. Methwold. Hockwold. Habentur in hoc tractu Northwold, Methwold, & Hocwold, i. e.— aquilonaris, medius, & angularis, quod in sinu Isidis velut angulo concluditur. Northwold vero 12. aestimatum hydis, in illa permutatione de qua supra diximus, cessit Rex Eadgarus Episcopo Wintoniensi, qui hoc statim contulit Eliensi Monasterio. Methwold ad Ducatum Lancastriae pertinens, cuniculos alit laudatissimos, cui ex constitutione Leoffini Abbatis tempore Canuti Regis, obsonium reddebat annuatim duorum mensium: ut vicinum Feltwell, Fel●well. Munfordorum antiquae & equestris familiae habitatio, quae an ab Hugone de Monte forti, qui cum Gulielmo I. Angliam est ingressus, plurimaque praedia tractu hoc invaserat, dicant qui rimantur stemmata: confundi enim saepius animadverto nomina: & in Charta libertatum Angliae ab Henrico I. concessa, inter testes venit Rob. de Mundforde, ut in rubro libro Scaccarii habetur, Parisio autem Rob. de Monteforti. Haec ruris pars, ut occidentis reliqua pascendis ovibus magnopere exponitur. Pleraeque villae aut unum, aut duo, aut tria, interdum quatuor vel quinque millia nutriunt: ut intelligas Proceres Angliae apud Edw. I. de vectigali lanis imposito conquerentes, consulto affirmasse opum regni dimidium in lanis consistere. Dignum est vel nosse leges quibus lanigerum hoc pecus apud nos regitur: nam alibi non reperiuntur. Gregem instituere solius fuit domini villae seu manerii, numerum & species ovium, stationesque designare: ubi locorum, & quo modo quibusque legibus cum in hyeme, tum in aestate pascerentur. Hyeme vero, non suas tantum, sed aliorum omnium terras stationem illam per semestre pascere. Caulas item erigere & circumducere sive stercorationis causa, sive alterius beneficii. Nihil horum alteri licitum, ne vel ovem unicam in alodio suo hic sustinere. Stationem istam the sheeps course vocant; libertatem erigendi caulas, fouldage & Saxonice fal●-●ocne, stercorationem Tath; & hyemalem pastionem Shack appellant ..... Reliqua desiderantur. FINIS. COMITES MARESCALLI ANGLIAE. ET DE MILITE DISSERTATIO. Ab HENRICO SPELMANNO Equ. Aur. Comitum MARESCALLORUM ANGLIAE CATALOGUS. QUIS sub Gulielmo Conquestore sit donandus Marescalli titulo, nemo (reor) certus affirmaverit. Non recepta enim videtur adhuc illa vox à Scriptoribus nostris: &, si qui novisse se id Officium arbitrentur; adeo dissonis tradidere vocibus, ut Lectorem relegant dubitantem. Mentionem quippe faciunt de 1 Hunt. 351. l. 5●. Praeposito Regalis Exercitus, de Principe Militiae, de Magistro Militum, Magistro Equitum, Tribuno Militum, Tribuno rei militaris, Tribuno Exercitus, etc. Sed cujus hi erant conditionis, Constabulariine an Marescalli, iidem an diversi Officiales, ductorumve tertium genus aliquod & in se distinctum alias, non definiunt. RADULPHUS DE WACEIO, apud Gulielmum 2 l. 6. ●. 4. Gemeticensem, Gulielmi Conquestoris pueri adhuc Tutor, constituitur & Princeps militiae Normannorum, & in mox sequenti capite altero Magister Militum appellatur. GULIELMUS vero filius OSBERNI, qui prae aliis omnibus Conquestorem excitavit ad Anglorum excidium, exercitusque ejus partem tertiam duxit; in Lib. MS. Coenobii de Bello, Tribunus Militum nuncupatus est, & alias Tribunus Normanni Exercitus: Quod de Marescalli munere (fateor) intelligatur. Huntingtonio, (pag. 367.) Dapifer Ducis. Sed Eboracensis Fecialis (nescio qua authoritate fretus, & in hoc à Vincentio, suo mastice, minime postulatus) expresse refert, Gulielmum Conquestorem in Anno Dom. 1068. id est regni sui 1. vel. 2. Gulielmum filium Osberni, ob eximiam in militia navatam operam, & Comitem Herefordiae & Marescallum Senescallumque Angliae constituisse. Certe, non redarguam, eum fuisse Marescallum; Angliam autem tunc venisse in titulos Marescalli, Constabularii, aut Senescalli non assentiar▪ Occubuisse vero dicitur Osbernus An. Dom. 1072. i. e. 5. vel 6. Conquestoris. HUGO GRANTESMALE à Fecialibus nostris in rimandis Genealogiis sub Conquestore inscribitur Marescallus. Sic in Genealogia Vice-Comitis Montecute: quo nixa fulciminae, non ariolor. Et in Genealogia Gulielmidum, quos Fitz-Williams appellamus; stirpis Protoplastum ponunt G. Fitz-Williams sub Gulielmo Conquestore Com. Marescallum Angliae. Henr. I JOHANNES MARESCALLUS. Suggerere se videtur istiusmodi quispiam in Testatione Brevis cujusdam Regis Henrici I. quod in Registro Veteri Ecclesiae Cathedralis Norwicensis legitur, numero XV. H. Rex Anglorum, Rogero Costard & Brumam fil. Waring, & Edwardo salutem. Praecipio, etc. quod Monachi de Norwic, etc. T. Johanne Mar (lego Marescallo) apud Theotford. Steph GILBERTUS (à forti arcu cognominatus Strangbow) secundus filius Gilberti Comitis Clare, creatus fuit Comes Palatinus Penbrochiae ann●●. Regis Stephani, & Marescallus fuit Palatii Regis; obiitque An. 14. Regis ●tephani. Sepelitur in Abbatia Tinternae. [Quaere: nam hic in petitione Margaretae filiae primogenitae & cohaeredis Thomae de Brotherton Comitis Norfolc. exhibita, in coronatione Ric. II. dicitur fungi officio Marescalciae in Coronatione Henrici II. ut post aliquot in Marescalcia Henrici de Percy latius patebit.] Henr. II. RICARDUS DE HU●EZ sub hoc tempore, viz. sub Henrico II. dicitur in Chron. Abbatiae de Bello, Tribunus Regis. RICHARDUS COMES PEMBROCHIAE, & Striguliae, etc. fortissimus Regni Lemstriae apud Hibernicos subactor, Dominus Marescallus & saevissimus teneri atque unici filii exenterator, quod ab hostibus oppressus in patrium confugit praesidium. Sepultus Kilkenniae An. 11●6. Dubliniam à Sidneio Prorege transfertur, monumentoque donatus in Ecclesia S.—, dislectum praebet a latere filium, ut aliquando vidimus. WILLIELMUS MARESCALLUS REGIS, filius Johannis, & Gilberti nepos, accipiens in uxorem ex tutelari dono Regis Richardi I. Isabellam filiam & haeredem dicti Richardi Comitis Penbrochiae, a Johanne Rege in die suae coronationis Penbrochiae Comes instituitur, & Marescallus Angliae, ut quidam perhibent 1 Quaere, Nam 〈◊〉 in Comitibus Penbrochiae, ait de Richardo praedicto: Hujus 〈…〉 Isabel 〈◊〉 dictum 〈◊〉 (●● quod ejus majores fuissent hereditaris Marescalli Palatii 〈◊〉) maritum codem [Comitata Palatin● 〈…〉 Quasi Majores istius Willielimi, non Isabellae axoris suae fuissent 〈◊〉 [Nota Spelmanni.] . Mihi autem non videtur hoc gavisus titulo. Nam Mat. Paris Auctor coaetaneus, eum omni laudum genere prosequitur, magnumque appellat Marescallum, sed (quod memini) non Angliae, verum Regis, Marescallum. Erat praeterea Custos Regis & Regni, necnon summus Angliae Justitiarius; ubi plura quaepiam de illo annotavimus. Placeat hic tamen repetitum ejus Epitaphium: Sum quem Saturnum sibi sensit Hibernia, Solem Anglia, Mercurium Normannia, Gallia Martem. Obiit An. 1219. 4. Henr. III. & sepultus est in Novo Templo 17. Kal. Apr. relicti●, praeter 5. filias, totidem filiis, qui in Marescalciam caeterasque dignitates succedentes omnes, omnes sine sobole excesserunt, viz. 4 Henr. III WILLIELMUS MARESCALLUS, qui secundi nuptiis Eleanoram duxit filiam Regis Johannis. Obiit 6. Apr. 1231. 15. Henr. III. ●● Hen. III. RICARDUS MARESCALLUS secundus filius, Anglicarum libertatum audacissimus assertor (ut habet Matthaeus Parisiensis) in Hibernia fortiter occubuit, 18. Henr. III. ●● Henr. III. GILBERTUS MARESCALLUS tertius filius (Clericali titulo primum addictus) duxit Margaretam sororem Wil Regis Scotiae, & in hastiludio Hartfordiae ab effraenato sui ipsius equo interficitur 5. Kal. Julii, An. Dom. 1241. 25. Henr. III. Mat. Paris. hunc Comitem Marescallum ibidem vocat (pa. 546.) Sepelitur in Novo Templo Londoniis. Stow in An. 25. Henr. III. Dom. 1241. ●● Henr. III. WALTERUS Comes MARESCALLUS (quartus filius) viam universae carnis ingressus est pridu Nonas Decembris aut ut alii volunt) octavo Calend. Decembris, etc. ●nquit Pari●ius in An. Dom. 1245. pa. 665.) id est 29. (vel ut alii volunt) 3●. Henr. III. ● H●nr III ANSELMUS Comes MARESCALLUS, quintus filius Willielmi Magni Marescalli, obiit 22. Decembr. id est 18. (ut quidam perhibent) post fratrem die, quinis suis sororibus haereditatem cedens herciscendam. ●● H●nr III ROGERUS BIGOT, quartus Comes Norfolciae illius cognominis, hoc deinceps modo in Marescalciam successit. Hugo Bigot pater ejus, Comes Norsolciae, vel (ut Parisius habet) Orientalium Anglorum; duxit Matildem primogenitam dictarum cohaeredum, & obiit Anno 9 Henr. III. Domini nostri 1225. (ut refert Parisius pa. 313.) omnibus uxoris suae fratribus jam tunc viventibus; & Marescallus ideo jure uxoris (ut quidam innuit) non potui● salutari. Extincto autem Anselmo fratrum novissimo, Anno 29. vel 30. Henr. III. divisaque anno 31. inter sorores immensa ejus haereditate, Marescalcia Angliae (cum Manerio de Hemsted in Comitatu Berceriae, cui è tenura id incumbit officium, & latifundiis annui simul valoris 1120. librarum) in Matildis cessit portionem. Marescalciam in eodem statim anno, cum illius Virga dignitatis, filio suo Rogero supradicto contulisse dicitur. Mat. Par. in An. 1246. qui 30. & 31. Henr. III. Eodem (inquit) anno, multiplicatis intercessionibus, concessa est Marescalcia cum officio & honore, Comiti Rogero Bigod, ratione Comitissae filiae Comitis Magni Willielmi Marescalli primogenitae uxoris suae. Cave: legendum videtur matris suae: nam Hugo pater ejus filiam duxit primogenitam Willielmi Magni Marescalli, ut supra declaravimus; ipse vero Isabellam filiam Willielmi Regis Scotiae, & in hastiludio conquassus expiravit sine prole, An. 1269. Stowus Anno 1246. Parisium secutus, Rogerum duxisse ait filiam Marescalli: perperam. 53. vel 54. Henr. III. ROGERUS BIGOT, ex Hugone fratre Justitiario Angliae Rogeri nepos in Norfolciae Comitatum & Marescalciam Angliae succedebat. 1. Edw. I. Hic cum Regi Edouardi I. in auxilium Comitis Flandriae profecturo militiam contumacius detrectasset; Regem postmodum ad gratiam ejus redintegrandam, haeredem scripsit; sponte tamen an coactus, non satis liquidum. Sunt enim qui obaeratum eum ferunt fratri suo Johanni, expertemque liberorum eidem cedere post dies suos patrimonium statuisse. Fratre vero nimia deposcente debitum importunitate, indignantem convenisse cum Rege Anno 1301. hunc & leniret, illum ut perderet. Regi patrimonium cum Marescalcia transcribendum. Ea tamen conditione, quod appositis annui valoris mille marcarum praediis, Rex ei Norfolciae Comitatum & Marescalciam Angliae ad terminum vitae suae concederet; necnon & soboli, si futura contigeret; Regi alioquin remansuram: & debita Rex praeterea solveret. Pactum alii impositum perhibent. Comes vero intra quadriennium moritur sine prole An. 1305. 1. penultimo vel antepenultimo Regis; praeteritoque fratre, pacta ad Regem deferuntur. Walsinghamus hunc non semel Comitem Marescallum nuncupat, (pa. 72. l. 42. & 73. l. 37.) ut Matthaeus Parisiensis Gilbertum Comitem Marescallum; & Willielmus Marescallus appellatus erat Comes, tempore Henr. II. non tamen cinctus fuit gladio Comitatus Striguil. donec Rex Johannes hoc ei praestitit in Coronatione sua: sic & Gaufridus Fitz-Peter gladio Comitatus Essexiensis (Vid. Houd. pa. 793. l. 52.) Cum tamen Comitis titulum ex concessione Principis nondum assecuti essent Marescalli; exemplo Tribunorum scholarum in Jure Civili, Tribunus Militum (qui nunc Marescallus dicitur) nomen & honorem Comitis signavit. (Vid. Cod. Tit. de Comitibus & Tribunis; & P. Tribuni scholarum.) 1. Edw. II. ROBERTUS DE CLIFFORD: cui Rex Edw. II. anno regni 1. officium contulit Marescalciae Angliae; ut patet Pat. p. 2. m. 19 1. Edw. II. NICOLAUS DE SEGRAVE eodem constitutus anno, durante Regis beneplacito. Pat. p. 2. m. 22. 9 Edw. II. THOMAS DE BROTHERTON, quintus filius Edouardi I. & secundo natus toro, creatus est Comes Norfolciae ab Edovardo II. fratre suo ex parte patris, 16. Dec. anno 6. dicti Edouardi II. & Marescallus Angliae 10. Febr. anno ejusdem 9 Tenend. dignitatem primam, sibi & haeredibus suis de corpore suo, etc. alteram, sibi & haeredibus Masculis de corpore suo legitime procreatis; ut testatur Charta Regia eandem concedens in haec verba— Dilecto & fideli nostro Thomae de Brotherton Comiti Norfolk. fratri nostro charissimo Marescalciam Angliae cum omnibus ad Marescalciam illam pertinentibus. Habendum & tenendum sibi & haeredibus masculis de corpore suo legitime procreatis, etc. faciendo inde nobis & haeredibus nostris servicia quae progenitoribus nostris inde debebantur, antequam eadem Marescalcia ad manus Domini E. quondam Regis Angliae patris nostri, per donationem & remissionem Rogeri le Bygod quondam Comitis Norff. & Marescalli Angliae d●venit, etc. Dat. per manum nostram apud Lincoln. 10. die Febr. anno regni nostri nono. Obiit hic Thomas anno duodecimo Edw. III. Gratiae 1338. relicta sobole, Edovardo, Margareta, & Alicia. 〈…〉 III. EDOVARDUS Comes Norfolciae & Marescallus Angliae, pupillari moritur in custodia; trans●unte ad sorores patrimonio. WILLI●●M●S MONTACUTE. Vincent. pa. 340. 〈…〉 III. THOMAS BEAUCHAMP decimus quartus Comes Warwic. Anno 1337. qui respicit Annum 11. & initium 12. Edwardi tertii, factus est (inquit Yorckus, pa. 577.) Marescallus Angliae ab Edouardi III. durante placito. Obiit 34. ●jusd. Edward●▪ [Vide: nam hoc non convenit cum ultimis supra.] (Spelm.) 〈…〉 III. ROGERUS MORTIMER Comes Marchiae 11. Marescallus erat Angliae 34. Edw. III. ut patet Original. 34. Ed. III. Rot. 16. 〈…〉 III THOMAS BE●UCHAMP Comes Warwicensis, ad placitum. Dat. 16. Octob. 4●. Edw. III. Pat. p. 2. m. 16. 〈…〉 III EDMUNDUS MORTIMER, Comes Marchiae, sub annis novissimis Edwardi III. Angliae fru●tur Marescalcia; sed quo nixus jure, nondum reperi. Anno vero Domini 1376. Regis Edw. III. 50. jussus a Johanne Duce Lancastriae (qui jam torpente sen●o Rege primas obtinuit) ut tuendae Calisiae gratia in partes cederet transmarinas; veritus machinationis quidpiam sibi impendere, Marescalc●● virgam cum officio Duci reddidit. Is laetanter hanc accipiens, ●am protinus familiari suo Henrico de Percy (quem Hotspur appellabant) tradidit. Stow. ibid.— Dicitur Marescallus Angliae in Commissione in Casu judicandi inter Thomam Moor & Rad. Basset concessa Guidoni Brian & Richardo Stafford, anno 48. Edw. III. Pat. p. 2. m. 20. dors. 〈…〉 III HENRICUS PERCY sic ut diximus Marescallus salutatur anno 50. Edw. III. jam tum languescentis & anno proximo morientis. 〈…〉 TWO HENRICUS DE PERCY non de jure, sed ● Regis beneplacito designatus est in Coronatione Richardi secundi, Marescallus Angliae; pendente tunc de jure controversia. Margareta quippe filia primogenita & haeres altera dicti Thomae Comitis Norfolciae in Processu facto ad istius Regis Coronationem, petitionem hanc exhibuit. A tres honore Seigneur le Roi de Castele & de L●on Duc de Lancastre & Seneschall d▪ Engleterre, supplie Margarete file & h●●re Thomas de Brotherton nadgairs Counte de Norff. & Marescall d' Engl●terre d estre acceptee al Office de Marescalcie ore al Coronement nostre Seigneur le Roy, come a son droit heritage apres la mort le dit Thomas son Pier, fesant l' Office per son Depute, come Gilbert Mar●schall Counte de Strogoile fist al Coronement le Roy Henry s●cond. C●st assauoire d● p●ser debatz en meson le Roy au jour de Coronement, & ● fair liveree des h●rbergages, & de garder les oesses del chambre l● Roy, pernant de chescun Baron & Count batiz Chiualer a c●l jour, un palfrey one une sell. Sup●r quo (inquiunt membranae Regiae) audita petitione praedicta, dictum fuit pro Domino Rege i●idem: quod officium illud in persona Domini Regis in feodo remansit, ad assignandum & contulendum cuicunque ipsi Regi placeret: & super hoc auditis tam pro Domino Rege quam pro praefata Comitissa pluribus rationibus & allegationibus in hac parte, pro ●o quod videbatur Curiae, quod sinalis discussio negotii praedictis, propter temporis brevitatem, ante Coronationem praedictam fieri non potuit; Henricus de Percy ex assensu & praecepto ipsius Regis assignatus fuit ad officium praedictum faciendum, percipiendo feoda debita & consueta, salvo jure cujuslibet, & sic idem Henricus officium illud perfecit. Hac scilicet vice; non diuturnus Marescallus. Sed quaere, quo Margareta nitebatur titulo, cum officium patri suo & haeredibus de corpore suo tantum masculis ut supra patet) conferretur? ● Ric. II. JO. FITZ-A●AN Dominus Maltravers.— 3. Ric. TWO THO. HO●LAND— ●. Ric. II. Sub ultima medietate Junii, cum Rex Gulielmum Walworth Praetorem ●ondinensem Equ. auratum constituit, creavit etiam (inquit Stowus) super monte versus Iseldoune Comites Marescallum & Penb. (pa. 463.) (Quaere, quis hic fuit?) 9 Ric. TWO THOMAS Dominus de MOWBRAY, filius (& post mortem Johannis fratris sui) haeres Elizabethae utriusque corum matris, filiae & haeredis Johannis Domini Segrave & Margaretae praedictae Ducissae Norfolciae, filiae & haeredis Tho. de Brotherton praedicti; creatus est à Ric. II. anno regni sui 6. Comes Nottingham. Et cum huc usque, Domini tantum Marescalli in Chartis Regiis nuncuparentur, iste * Sed in libro Feodario, sacto 20. Ed. III. Tit. Hund. de Frebriggs, sic legitur: Prior de Massingham tenet m● Massingham 4 tam part●m feodi Militis de Comit● Marescallo.— p. 26. [Spelman.] primus per chartam ejusdem Regis, dat. 12. Jan. regni 9 titulo investitus est COMITIS MARESCALLI ANGLIAE, tenendum sibi & haeredibus masculis de corpore suo exeuntibus. Anno deinceps 21. ejusdem Regis, evectus est in aviae dignitatem, Ducem scil. Norfolciae: sed haud multo post in exilium relegatus, Venetiis obiit, An. 1400. 1. Henrici IV. suscitavit prolem, Thomam, Johannem, Isabellam, & Margaretam, omnes Marescalciae functos dignitate, vel in seipsis, vel in sobole. 21. Ric II. THOMAS HOLLAND Comes Cantii, filius Thomae Holland Comitis Cantii, & fratris uterini Regis Ricardi II. ab eodem Rege anno regni sui 21. creatus est Dux Surriae: & ad cognoscendum de lite militari jam tum exorta inter Henricum Ducem Herefordiae, Appellantem; & Thomam Moubray Ducem Norfolciae Comitem Marescallum Angliae, partem ream; mox itemque factus est hac vice Marescallus Angliae, Aumarliense Duce tunc agente Constabulario. York, pag. 9 284. & 528. Hol. 493. b. 40. 494. b. 30. 22. Ric. II. JO. MONTAGUE Comes Sarisburiensis. 1. Henr. IU. THOMAS MOWBRAY, mortuo in exilio patre, Dux Norfolciae & Comes Marescallus Angliae salutatur. Sexto vero anno Henrici IV. capite mulctatus, sine prole excessit. 1. Henr. IU. RADULPHUS NEVILL Comes Westmoreland. 21. Ric. II. & Richmundiae 1. Henr. IV. fuit Comes Marescallus Angliae. Obiit 4. Henry VI 1425. York.— Vincent. pa. 340. 6. Henr. IU. THO. ERPINGHAM Commissarius ad exequendum officium Marescalli Angliae. Pat. p. 1. m. 30. 1. Henr. V. JOHANNES MOWBRAY, Thomae senioris secundus filius restituitur Comes Nottingham & Comes Marescallus Angliae, anno primo Henrici V. & deinceps anno tertio Henrici VI Dux Norfolciae in Parliamento restitutus est. Obiit Anno Domini 1432. ut York dicit pa. 391. vel An. 1434. ut dicit pa. 347. Vid. Vincent. ibid. 11. Henr. VI JOHANNES MOWBRAY filius dicti Johannis, Dux Norfolciae & Comes Marescallus Angliae, fato cessit anno primo Edwardi IV. Domini nostri 1461. THOMAS HOLLAND, Marescallus Angliae, durante minore aetate dicti Johannis; factus anno 11. Henrici sexti. Pat. p. 1. m. 20. 1. Edw. IU. JOHANNES MOWBRAY, vivente patre suo, creatus est ab Henrico VI. Comes Warren. & Surriae, eidemque morienti successit Dux Norfolciae & Comes Marescallus Angliae. Interiit An. Dom. 1475. 15. Edw. IV. unica suscepta filia & haerede, Anna nomine. RICARDUS Dux EBORACENSIS secundus filius Regis Edouardi IV. duxit praedictam Annam, filiam & haeredem ultimi Johannis Mowbray, & jure ejus, fuit Comes Marescallus Angliae, quod haec dignitas ad foeminas transiit haeredes de corpore Thomae Mowbray; non autem Dux Norfolciae, quod haec tantum masculis cedebatur. Iste Dux Ricardus cum fratre suo Rege Edouardi V. à Ricardo Duce Glocestriae avunculo eorum, nefandissima in Turri Londinensi morte obruitur, An. Dom. 1483. nullaque suscitata prole, ipsa etiam Anna extinguitur. 1. Rich. III. GULIELMUS Dominus BERKELEY, filius Jacobi Domini Berkeley & Isabellae uxoris suae, filiae Thomae Domini Mowbray Ducis Norfolciae, primi Comitis Marescalli Angliae; anno 1. Ric. III. factus est Comes Nottingham & Comes Marescallus Angliae; & 4. Henrici VII. Marchio de Berkeley. Exhalavit sine prole, anno 7. ejusdem Regis Henrici. JOHANNES HOWARD Eques Auratus (filius Roberti Howard Equitis Aurati & Margaretae uxoris suae, filiae & demum cohaeredis Thomae Mowbray senioris Ducis Norfolciae & primi Comitis Marescalli Angliae, utpote consanguineus & alter haeredum dictae Annae Ducissae Eboracensis;) constitutus est a Richardo III. Dux Norfolciae & Comes Marescallus Angliae: proque Rege suo fortiter dimicans in Bosworthensi praelio, una cum eodem, votis & fato conjunctus, interfectus est. Extincto autem ad hunc modum, Ducatus ejus Norfolciae & Marescalcia Angliae ad fiscum rediguntur; filiusque ejus & haeres Thomas Howard▪ qui a Richardo III. eodem tempore factus est Surregiae Comes, quo & pater Dux Norfolciae) licet jure gentium & naturae, domini sui Regis & patris signa insecutus esset, a victore tamen Rege Henrico VII. arce Londoniensi mancipatus coërcetur; sed nullo interea Marescalciae designato. THO. HOWARD tertius Dux. THO. HOWARD, heros fortissimus (quem ut verbo non transeam Virtuti Sacrum prohibet) creatus est Surriae Comes a Richardo III. cum & Joh. pater ejus in Ducem promovetur Norfolciae. Ipsis vero Rege & patre in Bosworthi praelio corruentibus; hic inter medias acies virtute dextrae sospes emicuit. Captus autem a Victore Rege Henrico septimo, in arcem Londinensem detruditur: sed ob eximiam probitatem, prudentiam, & fortitudinem, ab eodem Henrico post triennium evocatur; & ad debellandum hostes suos in praelia Lincolnense,— & Bambregense emissus, omnia adeo strenue gessit, ut in tractu Boreali tam ad compescendos Provinciales quam ad Scotos conterendos, Vicarius Regis designatur. Hoc ut auspicatius exequeretur, in ipso utriusque regni limine se constituit; Anglis à tergo clypeum tutelarem, Scotis à fronte gladium formidabilem. Contritis his, & pacatis illis, ad Regem gratus 〈◊〉 Hen●. VII. regreditur. Fit Angliae Thesaurarius & ad paternam dignitatem Comitis Marescalli Angliae restituitur. Rex moritur; succedit filius ejus Henricus VIII. qui in Galliam, cum illustri exercitu proficiscens, Nobilitatem pene omnem una abducit. Veteris autem hostis memor, Comitem denuo praeficit cum armatis copiis tractui Boreali; ut quae in absentia sua moliretur Scotus, praesto oppugnaret. Rex Scotiae Jacobus quartus, ansam ex absentia Regis tempestive comprehendendam ratus, Angliam cum ingenti exercitu ingreditur. Occurrit Comes in limit: pugnatur acerrime. Ruit Scotorum exercitus atque una Rex ipse, 2. Episcopi, 11. Comites, 17. Barones, 400. Equites aurati, minoris autem Nobilitatis & gregariae multitudinis 17000. cadentibus interea quamplurimis Anglorum. Captis deinde Scotorum castris, cum machinis pyreis & suppellectili bellico, firmatisque omnibus ad regionis pacem conducentibus, Londinum regreditur; reversoque è Gallia Regi Henrico inimici (licet fratris conjugalis) cadaver & opima spolia pacis & victoriae symbola proponebat. Laetus Rex è duplici palma; illa quam à Gallis ipsemet feliciter, ista quam à Scotis Comes fortissime detulit; Comiti reddit Ducatum Norfolciae; latifundia confert: & ut ipse pariter & nepotes de tanta victoria triumpharent, Emblema clypei interfecti Regis in diagonio clypei Howardotum gerendum perpetuo designavit. Pace inter Reges Angliae & Franciae composita, delegatur jam hic idem Dux Norfolciae in Franciam, cum Maria sorore Regis Henrici, Regi Franciae Ludovico desponsanda. Et transeuntibus deinde Rege & Regina Angliae in Aquitania, ad salutandum Regem & Reginam Franciae; hic totius Angliae Prorex constituitur, & Mariae tutor Principis infantulae. Tandem à Curia & Consiliis Regis per licentiam secedens octogenarius, residuo vitae pie ac placide exacto, in castro suo Framingamiae migravit ad Dominum. 〈◊〉 ●I▪ EDOVARDUS SEIMOUR Dux Somersetensis, à nepote suo Rege Edovardo VI. & Thesaurarius factus est & Marescallus Angliae; bellum jam adversus Scotos sub initio Regis suscepturus; Thoma Duce Norfolciae, priori Marescallo, Turri interea coërcito. JOHANNES DUDLEY Dux Northumbriae. Maria. THOMAS HOWARD in avitos Majorum titulos à Regina Maria post deliquium suscitatus, quartus Dux Norfolciae hujus nominis Comes Marescallus Angliae efficitur. Nuptias vero ambiens Mariae Reginae Scotiae, cum à Regina Elizabetha prohiberetur, fataliter recidit. GEORGIUS TALBOT, Comes Salopiae, qui in proscriptione Thomae Ducis Norfolciae novissimi, functus est officio magni Seneschalli Angliae; post sublatum eundem, Marescalli insignitur munere. ROBERTUS D' EUREUX, Comes Essexiae & Augiae, Vicecomes Bourchier, multisque praeterea illustris dignitatibus. Populi ab ephebis desiderium fuit, etiam Aulae, & ipsius aliquando Reginae Elizabethae. In Hispaniam missus cum exercitu, & una Carolus Howard Baro Effinghamiaes magnus Angliae Admiralius, imperio pares, Caletem diripiunt, spoliumque ingens referentes, hic Nottinghamiae Comitatu, ille Comitiva Marescalcia Angliae ad vitae terminum insignitur. Altero post haec anno, Comes Essexius in Hiberniam Prorex delegatur, ad Tironensium motus compescendos. Re vero parum integre administrata, Reginae contrahit indignationem, quam ut mulceat, propere advolat: sed desperata spe, ad arma provocat; & ausis decidens, mulctatur capite, 25. Feb. 1600. Eliz. 42. Sic ad fiscum rediit Marescalcia. THOMAS HOWARD è filio nepos Thomae ultimi Ducis Norfolciae (Comes Arundeliae & Surregiae, Comitumque omnium * Anglorum Proto-Comes. Britannicorum Primicerius; Baroniarum onustus titulis, Eques Periscelidis, Regiae Majestati à Consiliis, etc. heros natus ad ornamentum Reipublicae, veteris exemplar prudentiae & Romanae gravitatis;) donatus fuit avita Comitis Marescalli Angliae dignitate & virga aurea, à Jacobo Rege, ad vitae terminum possidenda. DE MILITE DISSERTATIO. MILES à mille, ut perhibent; nec probo, nec corrigo. Is autem est, qui in militiam legitime conscribitur: sed transfertur nomen ad Civiles aliquot Magistratus, officiales, ministros, famulos; de quibus dicemus, cum Militares absolverimus. Conscriptio duplex, Pl●b●●a, seu Gregaria; & Honoraria. De Gregario milite, plurimis licet honestato privilegiis in Jure Caesareo, nos hic non agimus. Honoratus est, qui honoraria aliqua solennitate in ordinem ascribitur Militarem. Ejus multiplex in appellatio. Brito in Synonimis: Miles, Eques, Tyro, Tyrunculus, atque Quirites, Atque Neoptolemus novus est regnator in illis. Valla & plures alii Decurionem nuncupari volunt: & addantur pari licent●a Equitum Romanorum antiqua nomina: Celeres, sub Romulo & Regibus, a celeritate in praelio: Flexumines, à flectendis equis milita●●bus; qui & postmodum Trossuli, quod sine peditum auxilio Trossulum, urbem in Tuscia, cepissent. Adjiciatur & recentius è Feudistis subvavasor; ab Anglo-Saxonibus Thanus, & quod Thanum (vernaculumque nostrum knight) Latine sonat, Minister. De prioribus dicant Academici; nos de reliquis suo loco. Nostra autem sic annectentur ad illa Britonis: Flexumines, Celeres, Decurio, Trossulus olim, Nuperius Thanus, Subvavasor, atque Minister. Miles vero, a militantibus in genere: Eques, à specie; quod equo merebat. Valla tamen. Miles (inquit) proprie qui pedibus militat, dicitur, Eques, qu● equo. Et dum Militis nomen perperam his impositum causatur quos dignatione afficimus, eos mavult Decuriones nuncupari; quod Duarenus nomen atque alii ad Majores item Villarum transferentes, vocem destituunt certa signicatione. Vallae tamen approbat Bebellius in Commentariis de abusione Linguae, & multa congerit adversus Interpretes qui hos appellant Milites: ut Tiraquellus item Vir doctissimus in Consuetud. Picta. Tit. 1●. §. ult. Gloss. 2. Tyro, miles novitus; cujus tamen est (ut docet Cicero, Tuse. 2.) ferre labor●m & vulnus contemnere. Tyrunculus, tyro rudior. Quirites; eur, non teneo: nullius enim ordinis suit; sed commune Romanorum nomen, à Quirino, i. e. Romulo. Sed Quirinus ipse, à quiris, Hastam▪ Sabinorum lingua) significante tanquam hastatus dicitur: Ovid. Fast. Hasta, Quiris, priscis est dicta Sabinis. Quirites igitur dicantur Milites nostri, velut Marti● & hastat●. Certissimum est, vocem receptam est 600. hinc annis pro Milite honorato; Ingulphumque Saxonem ideo dixisse Quiritem degenerem ut Virgilius, degenerem Neoptolemum) pro Milite non legitimo. Neoptolemus enim à 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, i. e. novus & 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alias 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 bellum; quasi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 novus bellator seu miles novitius; Pyrrhoque Achillis filio ideo impositum nomen, quod ad Trojanum bellum (a knight) id est, puer venerat. Et Equiti adjungi solet Aurati Epitheton; non ab aureis Equitum Romanorum annulis, ut multi suspicantur; sed ab auratis calcaribus quibus insignitur denuo (ut inferius dicemus) Eques hic noster. Franciscus enim Philelphus, qui floruit Anno 1480. (Eques ipsemet auratus) appellationem primus comperit; ut in Lib. Epistolar. 24. ca 1. ad Albertum Parrisium profitetur. In hoc autem magis videatur necessarium, quod apud Gallos, insigniores utique Magistratus (ut Loysaeus mihi Auctor est) Chevaliers; apud Neapolitanoes, sui quique Nobiles (ut Amiratus perhibet) Cavallieri, (id utrisque est Equites) appellentur; licet Equestrem non obtinuerint institutionem. Sed hos pariter auratos forsitan appellaverint. (Qu.) Ferunt etiam nonnulli (mihi nescio an imponentes) Imperatorem aliquoties eruditionis & id generis causarum Equites instituere, qui non habentur Milites honorati: ut item Comites inferioris gradus, de quibus diximus in suo loco: & Professores similiter Juris Civilis dici Equites Auratos cum 20. annos in eodem studio emensi fuerint. Sed haec ego per transennam, de exoticis. Militem nostrum seu Equitem Auratum à Romano Equite non deducimus. Ille totus olim ad Militiam fabricatus est; hic ad rem Civilem pariter; & sub Consulibus, ex opulentia non virtute. Quicunque enim 400. valebat Sestertia, i. e. monetae nostrae veteris Sterlingorum 3000. novae 6000. more & jure Civium Romanorum in Equestrem ordinem conscribendus fuit. Propinquior videtur, qui sub Imperatoribus baltheo cinctus est militari: hic vero tunc cultus non tam dignitatis fuit, quam cujusque militis Symbolum. Adeo ut discinctus pro ignavo dicitur & exuto militia, & inter poenas militares graviores habita. Virilis etiam toga non ad classem aliquam, sed adultos omnes pariter attinebat. Ad Germanos provoco, ut cum suos nobis in plerisque mores porrexerint, in hoc etiam auctores fiant. Martis autem sic adibant limina. Arma sumere (inquit Tacitus) non ante cuiquam moris, quam civitas suffecturum probaverit. Tum in ipso Concilio, vel Principum aliquis, vel pater, vel propinquus, Scuto frameaque juvenem ornat. Haec apud illos toga; hic primus Juventae honos: ante hoc Domus pars videntur, mox Reipublicae. Locum non intelligo de Ignobili; sed de eo cujus foret & Consiliis adesse Principum, & de rebus tractare publicis. Cum enim dixisset Tacitus in praecedentibus: Germanos nihil agere non armatos; subjungit illico, sed arma sumere, etc. ut citavimus. Ecce igitur Germani militis instituendi formulam. Primo, expetenda & expectanda Civium approbatio: Secundo, Consilii sententia: Tertio, symbolorum collator, qui est vel Princeps aliquis vel Magistratus honoris causa, vel pater aut propinquus mancipationis gratia. Quarto, symbolorum (id est scuti & frameae) collatio. Sic quinto, exultans telis Concilio egreditur Miles legitimus. Eques autem, non pedes: nam scutum & framea sunt Equitis armatura, & plane integra, non peditis; ut superius ipse docet Tacitus: Eques quidem (inquit) scuto frameaque contentus est: pedites & missilia spargunt, pluraque singuli. Hinc Tyroni istiusmodi duplex appellatio: Miles, à genere; Eques, à specie. Latine utimur utroque vocabulo; sed in vulgari Idiomate Galli, Itali, Hispani speciem tenent, sc. Chevalier, Cavalliere, Cavallero, à Latinoram Caballo. Germani, Kitter, à ritten equitare. Angli vero priscum secuti Saxonicum, knighte dicimus, quasi famulum seu ministrum militiae. Saepe conspicitur antiquae Institutionis specimen in sigillis Anglo-Normannorum usque ad aetatem—, ubi Eques exhibetur, scutum ad pectus, frameam gestans ab humero dextro. Et originis vestigium in conferendis Feodis militaribus; quae alias hastae traditione, alias baculi velut hastae, in jure feodali transferuntur. Solebant enim Magnates latifundia sua in portiones dispartiri (quae feoda vocant) ad alendum singulos milites; easdemque ob servitium & subsidium in bello clientibus suis hoc modo concedere; adjuncto insuper annulo, ad notandum (reor) fidelitatis Sacramentum, quo Vassallus Domino ratione feodi tenebatur. Admissos sic in Militiam suam suos milites appellabant; etiamsi nunquam in militiam progrederentur sed Vicarios mitterent. Hujusmodi fuisse eos censeo, de quibus in priscis nostris Annalibus Anglicanis saepe legitur, talem venisse tali expeditione cum 100 vel 200. Knights in comitatu suo. Quidam male intelligunt de Equitibus auratis; quidam verisimilius de Militibus gravis armaturae, quos Gallli homes de armes appelant. Tuo utere judicio. Hi vero non videntur olim aliquando prioribus illis inferiores, cum & in domini sui militiam baculi & annuli ceremonia admitterentur; tum & patrimonium una acciperent variis nobilitatum Privilegiis (ut supra videas in Feodum) quo militarem dignitatem splendidius tuerentur. Hoc enim patrimonium, Feodum Nobile dicebatur; quod ad Nobiles solum, non ad rusticos, non ad Burgenses vel opifices transmigraret. Galli igitur Milites antiquos dividunt in Chevaliers, Bannerets, & Bacheliers: Cujacius exponit, Equites, melo Equites, & Vasellos sive Vasallos: nisi malis (inquit) a Buccellariis ducere; quod equidem non probo. Teneat potius primam sententiam, Bacheliers idem esse quod Vassallos, i. e. Milites feodales; non quod meam tueatur assertionem, sed quod ipsa res hoc loquitur, Bacularios seu Bacillarios non minus dici à Baculo seu Bacillo feodali; quam Banneretti, à bannerio; Equites ab equo; feodalibus. Qui igitur fit, ut caeteri Equites (nam hi etiam equo merebant) feoda non dotati, Bacularii nuncupentur? Forte baculo etiam velut hasta in militiam aliquando admitterentur; vel ex errore natum, pauciores in plurimorum transisse appellationem, differentia ab Auctoribus non bene observata. Nam Germanis utique multos dici censeo Fanlchen, i. e. Vexilliferos, qui vexillo non suscipiunt hodie dignitatem. (Quaere.) Cum autem Militis instituendi ratio, alia non esset, quam honoraria Candidati seu tyronis in militiam (ut praefati sumus) susceptio: praestari solita est apud omnes populos vel armorum aliquid conferendo, vel Ceremoniam aliquam ad militiam pertinentem adhibendo. Romani, sub Imperio, Cingulo usi sunt militari. Germani Veteres (ut supra declaravimus) scuto & framea. Longobardi arma integra largiuntur. Sic Turismodus Rex Alboinum, Regis Audoini filium, Turismodi filii sui armis insignibus donat. Paul. Diac. Longob. 1. ca 16. Salici, Baln●o usi sunt; cum aliquo genere Armorum, & ritu sacro. Baln●o scil. ut purgati intelligerentur à spurcitie corporis & animae. Du Tillet p. 431. etc. Anglo-Saxones gladium ad altare consecratum à Candidati collo suspendunt. De Aetate Militari. AETas Militaris, quae Romanis Virilis dicitur, in exitu anni 16. pueritiae apud ipsos habita est; togamque ideo virilem (ut Germani olim Arma militaria) non sine Religionis ceremonia concedebant; ut mox videbitur. De Germanorum ritu, copiose admodum ex ipso Tacito in praecedentibus. Apud recentiores, Carolus Magnus Ludovicum filium suum 1 Thegan in Vi●● L●●▪ jam appellentem adolescentiae tempora, ense accinxit. Aluredus nepotem suum Aethelstanum 2 Malmesb▪ de Reg. l. 2 puerum adhuc praemature militem fecit. Henricus I. Gaufridum Comitis Andegaviae filium, 3 Jo Moyn. Hist. Norm. lib. 1. adolescentiae primaevo flore vernantem, quindecim annorum armis induit. Quid plura? Legitima hinc aetas militaris apud nos habetur annus decimus-quintus; nec auxilium igitur ad faciendum filium suum Militem quisquam à subditis deposcat feodalis Dominus, ne quidem Rex. Valet tamen junior factus. Rex Edourdus VI. anno aetatis decimo; Henricus VI. quinto▪ Prandens olim aliquando Dubliniae juvenis apud D. Proregem Hiberniae, vidi tenerum quendam adolescentulum prae Militibus aliquot antiquis accumbentem; nuntiatumque mihi est, ni memoria meretrix, eundem ipsum fuisse quem Prorex alius è sacro fonte susceperat, & in cunis statim Militem fecerat, dum apud Patrem infantuli fortuito hospitaretur. Facto perhibet authoritatem, quod in Juris nostri legitur Annalibus. Audivi (inquit Thirning Justitiarius 7. Henr. IV. fol. 8.) magnatem quendam, filium quem susceperat, ad sacrum deportasse fontem, arreptoque statim gladio, baptizatum, Militem fecisse, Anglice hoc adjiciens, Probus si poteris esto Miles, Armiger vero nunquam fueris. ●ec mirum hoc in secularibus ministeriis; cum in ipsis Ecclesiasticis, Hugo filius Hereberti Comitis admodum juvenis parvulus, 1 Flodoard. Remens. Hist. lib. 4. ca 20. qui nec adhuc quinquennii tempus explesse videbatur, in amplissimum Remensem Episcopus electus esset. Quantulacunque autem aetate factus est quispiam Miles, liber evadit à Domini feodalis potestate quoad Corporis sui ditionem, quam Custodiam vocant. Et peti videtur mihi ratio à majoribus nostris Germanis, quam expressit 2 De Germ. Mor. Tacitus: Ante hoc, Domus pars videtur; mox Reipublicae. De Evocatis ad Militiam suscipiendam. ANtiqui Juris est, ut in Regia Coronatione aliisque nonunquam solennibus, Rex Breve suum unicuique Vice-Comiti mittat; praecipiens, ut submoneat omnes in Comitatu suo, qui censu funguntur militari & non sunt milites, quod tali die ad Regis se praesentiam sistant, militarem suscepturi dignitatem. Census hic sub Normannicis nostris Regibus, 5. libris aestimatur; sub Henrico III. decem primo, deinde quindecim. Sub Edu. I. viginti: Hodie, quadraginta. Excipiuntur tamen ab hac angaria in Stat.— Edw. I. qui vel morbo diuturno, vel aere alieno, vel prole laborant numerosa. Brevis haec est forma: Rex Vice-Comiti Norfolciae Salutem. Praecipimus, etc. Proclamatur & de more per Comitatum: sed venientibus & non venientibus à Carolo Rege evocatis sors plerumque eadem. Nesciebant enim qui venerunt, ubi suam exhiberent praesentiam, eandemve facerent Recordari. Opinantur quidam coram Baronibus in Scaccario, quidam apud Comitem Marescallum, quidam apud magnum Camerarium Angliae; & dum caligant singuli, deviant omnes. Tandem enim definiri perhibent, in Cancellaria Registrandam. Verba autem Brevis sunt, coram Regis praesentia; & dum Regium sic opperiuntur otium atque bene-placitum, facultatum partem non exiguam, forte etiam & aevi minuant. Vice-Comites autem Summonitorum nomina Baronibus exhibent Scaccarii, hi vi●issim Commissionariis à Rege delegatis, ad componendum statuendumque de animadversione pecuniaria, in evocatos (velut contumaciae reos) sigillatim imponendae; quam si (gravem licet) non admiserint, vel subterfugiendo detrectaverint, è terrarum suarum usu fructibus (quos Exitus vocant) Barones Scaccarii Regi addicunt. Primo termino 40s. secundo 4l. tertio 8l. quarto 12l. quinto 16l. atque ita pro arbitrio assurgentes. Fuit retroactis seculis animadversio à Commissariis imposita, satis levis; sed hodie gravis admodum: Tenuis enim fortunae viri, olim 20. 30. 40. solidis plectebantur: hodie, libris totidem; Et ditiores nonnulli ducentis, trecentis, quadringentis. De Modo creandi Militem honoratum: & primum de cingulo Militari. CUm in creando Milite maxime olim esset necessarium officium Cinguli; de cingulo quidpiam praelibandum. Ejus triplex genus: Civile, zona; Militare, baltheus; Mixtum, cingulum indefinite. Hinc Varro zonam inter vestimenta refert; baltheum inter arma. Cingulum utrisque convenit, & est tam dignitatis & magistratus, quam militiae symbolum; & à Trojanis seculis honorarium, ut Homero passim. Romani Veteres Equitem honoratum instituebant equo & annulo aureo à Censore datis: Inferiores, Milites qui à Caesaris erant Comitatu, cingulo donabant, quo à caeteris innotescerent Militibus. Fuit autem hoc è corio atque inde Baltheus nuncupatum: nam balgh & beltz Germanis pellem significat; ut item (quod Galli dicunt pro baltheo) baudeier, l in u & t in d mutatis. Romanum enim nihil censeo genuine quod per th scribitur. Huc autem id Propertii lib. 4. Eleg. 11. Praebebant caesi baltea lenta Boves. Balthei seu Cinguli militaris officium fuit, Munire, Ornare, Distinguere, Legionem notare, & Arma sustinere. 1. Munire; ideo late compositum, aliasque bullis, alias laminis (ne distringeretur) firmatum. Virgil. Aen. lib. 12. — Humero cum apparuit ingens Baltheus, & notis fulserunt cingula bullis Pallantis pueri.— Humero (inquit) ut alibi: Tum lateri atque humeris Tegeaeum subligat ensem. 2. Ornare; pro fastu militari & lateris dignitate, auro, gemmis, & insigni opere.— Virgil. Aen. 9 — Rhamnetis & aurea Bullis Cingula— Passim Homerus; & supra modum Odyss. XI. sed inferiores intuere. Luithprandus Hist. Lib. 4. ca 5. Boso mirae longitudinis & latitudinis habebat balteum, qui multarum & preciosarum splendebat nitore gemmarum. 3. Distinguere: aliàs personas, ut Atridarum apud Homerum aurea balthea: Hectoris, puniceus: Diomedis, discolor. Aliàs Dignitates & Magistratus: ut in Vet. Epigramm. Val. Probi Annot. Aulica quippe Comes rexi patrimonia clarus, Et mea patricio fulserunt cingula cultu. Hinc in Epilogo Edicti Theoderici Regis Italiae, cingulum pro Magistratu ponitur. Nec cujuslibet dignitatis, aut substantiae, aut potentiae, aut cinguli, aut honoris persona; contra haec— esse veniendum. Et apud Suidam, 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉, i. e. Cingulum tropice pro facultate (seu authoritate) capitur, quod cincti ad rem gerendam sunt expeditiores. Ind crebro in Canonibus, Judex cinctus. Erat namque Cingulum tam Palatinae quam Armatae militiae insigne. Ideo apud Cassiodorum & Jurisconsultos pro Magistratu dicitur & ejusdem administratione. Variar. lib. 6. formul. 12. otiosi cinguli honore praecincta dignitas, i. e. Magistratus citra molestiam dignitas. Et Imperator inferius Judices admonens de laudabiliter se gerendo: Grave (inquit) pondus invidiae est, splendere cinguli claritate, & morum lampade non lucere. 4. Legionem notare: Isidorus Origin. lib. 19 ca 33. Baltheus cingulum militare est dictus, propter quod ex eo signa dependent ad demonstrandam Legionis militaris summam, id est, sex millium sexcentorum; ex quo numero & ipsi constituunt. 5. Arma sustinere: Ensem & Clypeum; & singulare singularem; de quibus multa Homerus, qui & de Thoracis baltheo meminit, Ajacemque Hectori baltheum cum ense dedisse, Iliad. 7. Sidonius Arvernorum Episcopus, qui floruit An. Dom. 470. suo aevo hos cultus attribuit, in Panegyr. ad Anthem. Aug. Car. 2. Pectora bis cingunt zonae.— Et supra, Bullis hostilibus asper Applicat à laeva fulgentem balteus ensem, Inseritur clypeo victrix manus, etc. Romanis siquidem frequens, ut pluribus obiter hic inferius. De recentioribus etiam Bartholinus Austriad. lib. 9 Et mos gemmato mucronem annectere balteo. Sic à veterimis seculis ad nostram aetatem (qua maxime floret) perductum vides cingendi hunc morem: de quo dicam ut Martialis, de Parazomio: Militiae decus hoc & grati nomen honoris, Arma Tribunitium cingere digna latus. Hinc Cingulum velut militiae dignitatumque compendium, in eisdem conferendis optatissimum. Frisones, cum cinctura gladii colaphum impingunt: & hoc à Carolo Magno eorum Praesidi concessnm ferunt in quadam Constitutione; ubi de Militibus agens: Eis gladium (inquit) circumcingat; & dato eisdem, sicut consuetudinis est, manu colapho, sic milites faciat, eisdemque firmiter injungendo praecipiat, ut deinceps more militum sacri Imperii aut regni Franciae, armati incedant— Qui Frisones signum suae militiae a dicta Potestate (i. e. Praeside) recipere debent; in quo Corona Imperialis, in signum suae libertatis à nobis concessa, debeat esse depicta. Ex Francis. Mennenio Tit. ha. 112. Anglorum erat consuetudo, (non ingressis adhuc Normannis) quod qui Militiae legitime consecrandus esset, vespera praecedente diem suae consecrationis, ad Episcopum vel Abbatem, vel Monachum, vel Sacerdotem aliquem, contritus & compunctus de omnibus suis peccatis, confessionem faceret; & absolutus, orationibus & devotionibus, & afflictionibus deditus, in Ecclesia pernoctaret in crastino quoque Missam auditurus, gladium super altare offerret, & post Evangelium Sacerdos benedictum gladium collo Militis cum benedictione imponeret: & communicatis ad eandem Missam sacris Christi mysteriis, denuo miles legitimus permaneret. Haec Ingulphus Saxo, p. 901. Sic fortissimus Herewardus (qui Normannis tantam facessivit operam) Miles factus est. Hanc tamen consecrandi Militis consuetudinem aspernati sunt Normanni, nec Militem legitimum talem tenebant, (inquit Ingulphus) sed socordem Equitem & Quiritem degenerem. Et quorsum, obsecro? Num quod ab Ecclesiasticis acceperint dignitatem, non à Viris Militaribus? Certe Gulielmus Rufus (qui postea Rex evasit) non a patre suo Gulielmo I. Rege Angliae, sed à Lanfranco Archiepiscopo Cantuariae, in vita patris, Miles factus est, ut Malmesburiensis & Parisius testantur. Num quod ab Altari susceptum gladium? Prequens inter ipsos Anglo-Normannos ritus sub Henrico II. ut perspicue refert Auctor coaetaneus Petrus Blesensis, Epist. 94. Sed & hodie (inquit) tyrones, enses suos recipiunt de altari. Et rationem adjungit, ut profiteantur se filios Ecclefiae, atque ad honorem Sacerdotii, ad tuitionem pauperum, ad vindictam malefactorum, & patriae liberationem, gladium accepisse. Quomodo tuebantur Professionem? Male, (ut hodie) quod pluribus Blesensis. Num denique, quod in Ecclesia pernoctarent vigilantes & paenitentes? Sospitavit equidem & pius hic usus ad Edouardi I. saeculum, ut è Florilego deinceps videris. Carolus Magnus, An. 791. Ludovicum filium suum jam appellentem adolescentiae tempora Ranespurgi ense accingit. Theganus Episc. Trever. de Vita Lud. Pii, pag. 166. Ludovicus ipse Imperator jam factus filium suum Carolum [Calvum] armis virilibus, id est, ense cinxit, corona Regali insignivit, etc. Idem pag. 271. & Aimoin. lib. 5. ca 17. Alfredus Rex Anglorum Aethelstanum suum e filio nepotem puerum adhuc praemature militem fecit, donatum chlamide coccinea, gemmato baltheo, ense Saxonico cum vagina aurea. Malm. Gest. Reg. lib. II. ca 6. pa. 49. Henricus III. Anno 1252. ad Natale Domini, baltheo (inquit Parisius) apud Eboracum donavit militari [Alexandrum] Regem Scotiae, & cum eo Tyrones fecit▪ 20. Qui omnes vestibus pretiosis & ●xcogitatis, sicut in tam celebri tyrocinio de●uit, ornabantur, pag. 802. Intelligo, à Rege datis; nam sic idem Auctor in Anno—. Et cum legati nepotem cingeret, 30. lib. annuatim redditas ei dedit haereditario, & cuidam alii censum pariter opulentum, pag. 530. Edwardus 1 ter centum simul preciosis donat vestibus, nec dignitatem tamen confert, donec in Templo nocte peregissent vigilias, ut è Florilego videmus. Pluries citaturus sum locum; semel habeatis integrum. Ad augmentandum igitur (inquit) 1 profectionem suam in Scotiam, fecit Rex per Angliam publice 2 proclamari, ut quotquot 3 tenerentur fieri Milites 4 successione paterna, & qui haberent 5 unde militarent, adessent apud Westmonasterium in festo Pentecostes, 6 admissuri singuli omnem ornatum militarem praeter Equitaturam, de Regia 7 Garderoba. Confluentibus itaque 8 300. juvenibus, 9 filiis Comitum, Baronum, & Militum, distribuebantur 10 purpura, byssus, syndones, cyclades auro textae, effluentissime prout cuique competebat. Et quia Palatium Regale etsi amplum, tamen ad tot occurrentium turbam angustum fuit, apud 11 Novum Templum Londini, succisis lignis pomiferis, prostratis muris, erexerunt 12 papiliones & tentoria, quo tyrones deauratis vestibus se singuli decorarent. Ipsa quoque nocte in 13 Templo praedicti Tyrones, quotquot poterat capere locus ille, suas vigilias faciebant. Sed 14 Princeps Walliae, praecepto Regis patris sui cum 15 praecelsis tyronibus fecit vigilias suas in Ecclesia Westmonasteriensi.— Die autem 16 crastina, 17 cinxit 18 Rex filium 19 baltheo militari in 20 Palatio suo, & 21 dedit ei Ducatum Aquitaniae. Princeps ergo factus 22 Miles, perrexit in 23 Ecclesiam Westmon. ut 24 consocios suos militari gloria venustaret.— Princeps autem propter turbam comprimentem non secus sed supra 25 magnum Altare, divisa turba per 26 dextrarios bellicosos, socios suos 27 cinxit. Mat. Westm. An. 1309. pa. 458. Sine ut hic breviter notem adnotanda. ¹ Profectionem] Quam sub quindena S. Johannis sequenti Rex iniit; & multis in Scotia truculenter gestis, Carleoli obiit anno proximo, i. e. 1307. ² Proclamari] Non in forma juris per Breve Regium Vice-Comitibus directum, ut non venientes mulctarentur; aut non venientes & non obtinentes dignitatem, finem, i. e. animadversionem Regi solverent pecuniariam. ³ Tenerentur] Tenebantur olim omnes liberi homines militare. ⁴ Successione paterna] Ergo filius & haeres Militis, qui patri successurus erat in haereditate, ex jure Miles etiam faciendus erat. ⁵ Vnde militarent] Licet ex patre milite non esset oriundus; tamen si haberet unde se in militia sustineret, suscipere tenebatur dignitatem. Et hoc quidem olim fuisse videtur praedium 5. lib. sub ingressu Normannorum. ⁶ Pentecostes] Unum è tribus majoribus Festis, quibus prisci Reges prodire solebant coronati; convocatisque regni Magnatibus, de arduis consulere & statuere. ⁷ Admissuri] Suscepturi. ⁸ Garderoba] Vestiarium. Graecis inferioribus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 à veste Germanorum Roch. ¶ [Reliqua pars Commentarii desideratur.] Galli praeter Cingulum seu Baltheum, gladium adhibent & aurata calcaria, nihil sacri interposito. Bartholin. Austriad. 9 pa. 643. Et mos gemmato mucronem annectere baltheo. Recentiores plerique nullum tradunt symbolum; sed gladio delibant alii scapulas & pectus Candidati, alii humerum velut percutientes tangunt, dicentesque sois Chevalier, au nom de Dieu, gladium apponunt osculandum. Qui humerum feriunt, colaphum impingentium tenent rationem; candidato velut interminantes, ut deinceps nunquam ictum ferat inultus. Vidi aliquando senem Ephaebo filio sic primum porrigentem gladium. Sed hoc Gentilium more, non Christianorum; è quibus ictus olim aliquando miles, respondit, Non verbera tulissem, si non essem Christianus. Qui olim fiebant Milites. FIebant olim Milites ex solis militibus vel militiae Candidatis; non servis quantumvis eximiis, non colonis, non rusticis, non burgensibus, non mercatoribus, vel togatis. Non Servis. Hinc Regis filium carpit Virgilius Aen. — Quorum primaevus Helenor, Maeonio Regi quem serva Licimnia furtim Sustulerat, vetitisque ad Trojam miserat armis. Vetitis (inquit) armis: quod Helenor licet Regis filius, ex serva tamen natus, servus esset: servisque jure militari vetitum fuit arma ferre. Sic Mercatoribus atque Rusticis, sub quorum appellatione burgenses veniunt, & coloni, L. Julia de vi publica, & Constitutione Frederici Imp. lib. 5. Feud. Togatis; quod in scholis suam habuere militiam, suas dignitates. A Veterum enim moribus alienum fuit, ad Gradus provocare suae professioni non competentes. Doctorum primus, quos invenerim, in Militiae dignitatem conscriptus est Bartholus de Saxoferrato Jurisconsultus celeberrimus; qui & cum dignitate Leonem accepit pro insignibus. Inter classes Vrbicas, omnium apud nos primus militari cingulo donatus est à Ric. II. Praetor Londinensis, non servati tantum civis sed regni causa, cum egregium proditorem inter copias coram Rege exultantem pugione occidisset; successoribus facto hanc obtinens dignitatem, pugionemque inscribi clypeo civitatis. Sunt & qui— aevo— primum ferunt Justitiariorum Angliae Militis donatum titulo. Sed decipiuntur proculdubio; ut copiose viderint in Catalogis nostris Justitiariorum; licet & me alterius interdum nitentem fide non errasse alias haud asseruero. Sub Rege— omnes plerumque Justitiarios Tribunales Milites salutabant. Henricus VIII. selectos tantum aliquot. Regina Elizabetha (tenax nimium in conferendis honoribus) vix unum atque alterum, praeter summos. Jacobus Rex cataractas aperuit Dignitatum, obrepentibus interea (ne asperius dicam) plurimis ignobilibus. Quippe cum in tota Anglia vix 300. reperisset Milites, ipsos statim ter tribus auxit centenariis. Mirum nostro aevo, antiquis vero satis assuetum. Henricus III. nuptias sororis suae cum Alexandro Rege Scotiae mille celebravit Militibus. Sed refert Paulus Aemilius, Philippum Pulchrum Regem Franciae in praelium contra Edovardum III. Regem Angliae, ter mille descendisse Militibus, baltheo militari (ut ejus utar verbis) virtutis causa donatis. Qui possunt Militem facere. EOrum fuit Militem facere, quorum fuit Feodum dare. Nam qui feodum dabat, Militem constituit, & patrimonium insuper adjecit quo aleretur. Minus igitur est, Militem facere, quam & facere & alere. Qui Feudum dare possunt, exprimit Liber 1. de Feudis, Cap. 1. Feudum (inquit) dare possunt, Archiepiscopus, Episcopus, Abbas, Abbatissa, Praepositus; si antiquitus consuetudo eorum fuerit, feudum dare. Dux, Marchio, & Comes similiter, feudum dare possunt, qui Regni vel Regis Capitanei dicuntur. Addit & Valvasores, sed minuta plenitudine. Videamus autem an hi milites utique facerent. Ab Archiepiscopo: Lanfrancus Archiepiscopus Cantuariae, Gulielmum Rufum quem nutriverat, Militem fecit, patre adhuc vivente; uti referunt Malmesburiensis & Parisius, hic in Anno 1087. pa. 13. ille pa. 120. Sic Goslariae, per concessionem Archiepiscopi (Bremensis) primum se Rex (puta Henr. III. Imp.) arma bellica succinxit. Lambert. Schafnab. in Chro. T. 313. Ab Episcopo: Annales Dominicanorum Colmariens. in Anno 1298. Venerabilis (inquiunt) Dominus de Leichtenberg Argent. Episcopus, fecerat hoc anno ante Festum S. Michaelis Milites; quos omnes vestivit ad minus triplici vestimento; soil. Tunica preciosa, Surgotum nobili vario, Suchornam cum vario precioso. En in uno priscus hic ritus alius; cum dignitate vestimenta largiri. Sic Henricus III. apud Parisium. Et quidem triplicia: quod ex prisca Romanorum consuetudine ad Equites spectabat; Pediti enim simplex, duplex Centurioni, triplex Equiti dabatur. Sic in Ecclesia S. Dionysii, die Dominica per manus Episcoporum armis accingitur Ludovicus Pius Imperator, qui paulo anterius arma deponere & ante altare ponere coactus est. Thegan. in Vit. ejus pagg. 250. & 253. Ab Abbate: Sic apud Ingulphum Saxonem, Herewardus cum aliquot aliis cohortis suae tyronibus, à Brando Abbate Burgi S. Petri patruo suo (sub An. 1068. id est, 2. Gulielm. I.) more Anglico, quem dedignati sunt Normanni, Miles factus est. Morem expressit Stowus in Annalibus Vernaculis sub Gulielmo I. Anno 1061. Herewardus Anglo-Saxo sub An. 1068. (i. e. 2. Gulielmi I.) patruelem suum Abbatem Petroburgensem adit; confessusque & absolutus, noctem totam in Ecclesia vigilans, orans, & jejunans transigit. Mane gladium affert super Altari, quem (finito Evangelio) consecratum, Abbas a collo Herewardi suspendit; benedictumque ipsum & sacra imbutum Eucharistia, Militem dimisit jam legitimum. Abbatibus vero Milites facere prohibuit Synodus Londinensis sub Anselmo Archiep. Cant. An. 1102. Cap. 17. quod apud Eadmerum videas lib. 3. & Malmesb. lib. 1. de gest. Pontif. De Abbatissa & Praeposito, non habeo quod proferam. Forte quod antiquitus consuetudo corum fuerit, feudum dare (ut Lex ait) aut non omnino, aut quid●m parcius. Viro autem à muliere suscepisse decus Militiae, probrum videretur. Praeter hos Ecclesiasticos, qui Feodum dare potuerunt, Sacerdoti etiam licuit inter Anglo-Saxones Militem facere. Sic enim Ingulphus: Post Evangelium Sacerdos benedictum gladium collo Militis eum benedictione componeret, etc. ut supra. Haec de Ecclesiasticorum Militibus; quorum gesta Feodalia & privata multo accuratius olim mandabantur literis, quam Laicorum Procerum. Nemo vero opinabitur, Proceres Seculares, quibus totus in Bello genius, minus valuisse in militaribus dignitatibus conferendis, quam Magnates Ecclesiae, belli inimicos. Ducem Burgundiae, celeberrimum instituisse ordinem Militum aurei velleris, nemo non novit. Et ducem Britanniae suos creasse Milites, inferiu▪ patebit. Marchiones, qui aliud non sunt quam Comites limitanei, Comites vero primarii ordinis, parem sine dubio (si non supra) cum Comitibus potestatem habuerunt. Ad montem, qui castro de Lewes supereminet, se applicant (Barones) ubi ordinatis alis & arcubalistis atque peditibus bene dispositis, Gilbertum Comitem Gloverniae Comes Leycestriae Symon armis militaribus decoravit. Breviar. de Bello. (Sed hoc forte, ut à Principe Militiae.) In Veteri MS. Codice familiae Sharneburnorum, legimus, quod in Militia Terrae Sanctae, aevo Regis Ricardi I. Will. de Rustings & Alan de Sharnburne facti sunt Milites de manu Comitis Arundel. tertii. Et Andreas de Sharnburn similiter tempore Regis Johannis, de manu Willielmi Comitis Arundel. IV. Et ne Comites hoc fecisse à Rege delegatos cogites; Giraldus Cambrensis in Itinerario Cambriae (Ca 12.) refert, 15. Armigeros (tempore Henrici I.) cingulo militari donatos & armis Dominorum suorum decoratos à Constabulario Castri de Pembrock primipilo Arnulphi de Montgomery. Licuit forte milites suos Feodales hac insignire dignitate, non alienos. (Quaere.) Sic in An. Gratiae 1306. cum Ducem sibi constituissent Scoti Gulielmum Waleys; militiae (inquit Walsinghamus, in Edw. I.) donatus est cingulo à quodam Comite regionis illius. Creabantur & à Civibus Belcarii, & in Provincia, (Joh. Tilius de Reb. Gall. lib. 2. ca de Equitib. pa. 180.) Poterat & Miles (ut quidam asserunt) eum Militem facere, qui à Patre natus est Milite; quod haec dignitas ad talem pertinuisse habita est tam ex jure quam ex gratia; ut ex eo liqueat quod Edovardus I. proclamari fecit per totam Angliam, ut quotquot tenerentur fieri Milites successione paterna, & qui haberent unde militarent; adessent gradum suscepturi. Sic Alexander Rex Scotiae, licet ab Henrico III. Rege Angliae armis cingeretur militaribus, potuisset tamen (inquit pa. 803.) ipsa arma suscipere à quovis Principe Catholico, vel ab aliquo Nobilium suorum. Franciscus I. Galliae Rex equestre baltheum & ensem accepit à Petro Baiardo copiarum Praefecto in pugna Marigniana apud Insubres, 17. Kal. Octobr. An. 1515. Chopp. de Doman. lib. 3. Tit. 26. Sect. 13. pa. 574. in med. Ferdinandus Rex Portugalliae praelium initurus anno 1382. ab Edmundo Comite Cantabrigiae Anglo, in proprio suo regno factus est Miles. Henricus VI Rex Angliae in festo Pentecostes An. 1424. regni 4. miles factus est à Duce Bedfordiae subdito suo, Galliae Regente; cum jam vitae & regni annum quartum ageret. holinsh. eo anno. Ludovicus XI. quum ille Remis induta purpura Francici Imperii habenas capesseret, à Philippo Burgundiorum Duce ad hoc rogato Eques cingitur, 18. Cal. Sept. An. 1461. Chopp. Doman. lib. 3. Tit. 26. nu. 13. pa. 574. Historia de Offa primo, qui strenuitate sua Angliae maximam partem subegit: cui simillimus fuit secundus Offa. Proceres consulunt Regi (Offae I.) ut filium suum moribus & aetate ad hoc maturum, militari cingulo faciat insigniri, ut ad bellum procedens hostibus suis horrori fieret & formidini. Rex celebri ad hoc condicto die, cum solempni & regia pompa gladio filium suum accinxit; adjunctis vero tyrocinio suo strenuis adolescentibus generosis, quos Rex ad decus & gloriam filii sui [armis] Militaribus indui fecit & honorari. fol. 3. a. Militem autem à non Milite faciendum negarunt Veteres, quamvis à Rege. Cum igitur Ferdinandus Rex Portugalliae An. 1382. in procinctu aciei, viginti quatuor vel eo supra, armis imbuisset militaribus; nunciatumque ei esset, minime illos fore Milites, quod Rex ipse nondum Miles cingeretur; cincturam protinus ab Edmundo Comite Cantabrigiae (qui in acie versabatur) auspicatus, caeteros omnes redintegravit Milites.— Disseraon que por elle naō sero feito Cavalleiro post que ret foset, naō podia fazer Cavalleirs. Eutamo armon Cavalleiro oh Cond● Aymon de Camburg v fez el rei de novo o● mesmos Cavalleiros que tintra feitos o outros. 1382. Chron. de Portug. reform. peto Duarto Nun ez do haō na vida del Fernando. hoio 226. Et licet justa ev●neat ratio, ut inferior semper omnem a superiore referat dignitatem; minor a majore: supremae tamen potestatis Principi, qui culminis sui territorium securus non egrediatur, necessario competit, ut non solum ab inferiore consequatur hunc honorem, sed a subdito etiam suo & vassallo. Hodie creandi Militis Privilegium apud supremae Potestatis Principes tantummodo retinetur; & his omnibus aeque competit, cujuscunque fuerint gradus aut fastigii. Majores tamen habentnr Milites, qui à Majore constituuntur Principe; & laudatior consuetudo quae antiquior. Danorum Reges (ut mihi auctor est Crantzius) ante— (qui patrum nostrorum memoria floruit) crearunt neminem. Nec Romani (ut dicitur) Pontifices, ante Paulum III. qui Nicolaum de Ponte Senatorem Venetum primarium statuit. Quid Dux ipse Venetus, nondum reperi: nec Belgarum Ordines hoc aggressos. Successores vero Pontifices, suos quinque Milites non tantum fecerunt; sed coacta pecunia (ut Sansovinus refert) ordinis alicujus clientelares, suo de nomine nuncupatos: Milites seil. S. Petri, S. Pauli; Milites— Julii, Pii, Lauretanoes, etc. Morem denique Imperatores Turcici amplexi sunt, ex quo Selnnus truculentus ille Gentilem Belinum egregium pictorem (Constantinopolim accersitum, ut aulam Regiam depingeret) torque & codicillo Militiae donavit. Quaeritur autem an legitimus hic Miles? Sunt enim qui negant: & mihi quidem videtur legitimus (ut Juliani olim Milites) sed in militiam conscribi Turcicam, non Christianam. De Principe Excommunicato dignitatem conferente, pariter judi●andum Canonicis. Judices sub Equitum Appellatione censeri: scil. Equites esse Palatinos. APud Romanos, Judices omnes qui non erant Senatores, ex Equitibus legebantur, & equestribus igitur innotuerunt symbolis, annulo, Equo, & angusto clavo. In Equitum vero appellatione non sunt cogniti vulgariter, quod minor haec dignitas sub majori illa delituit. Tametsi Judicum non Equitum nomina ferrent (inquit 1 〈◊〉 2. ●a. 29. Alexand. ab Alex.) tamen Equestris fuisse ordinis, & inter Equites—, haud dubium est. Qui in Provinciam itaque sub Impp. missus est Judex; militum more alias chlamyde donabatur, ut apud Cassiodorum videas lib. 6. Variar. ca 21. alias gladio instruebatur, ut lib. 7. ca 1. in formula Comitivae Provinciae: Gladio (inquit) bellico rebus paratis accingitur: Sed addit inferius; Arma ista juris sunt, non furoris contra noxios instituta, ut plus pavor corrigat quam paena consumat— Civilis est pavor iste, non bellicus, etc. Haec apud Romanos; & passim similiter. Cum enim populis omnis Borealis (ad exemplum Germanorum) nihil facerent non armati; Magistratus omnis & potestas Judiciaria penes militares retinebatur, ut in Wisegothorum LL. lib. 2. Tit. 2. ca 26. animadvertas, & in caeteris pluries antiquis legibus. Divisus enim tune populus in militares & agricolas: his autem illos jus dixisse, clarum est ex Tacito. Cinguntur ●g●tur Judices, ne non Milites haberentur; sed Palatini non Castren●●s: quos sie distinguit vetus quidam apud Balbum: Miles pungit Equum, sed Judex judicat aequum: Intellige; Miles castrensis pungit equum; sed Miles forensis seu Palatinus, i. e. Judex, judicat aequum. De Palatino Milite sic Fulbertus Carnotensis in Hymno Paschali Resp. §. 1. pa. 204. Ipsum canendo supplices Regem precemur milites, Vt in suo clarissimo Nos ordinet palatio. Hinc & Judex, Miles justitiae nuncupatur: quod nostro tempore (inquit Balbus) potest esse una dictio composita, & tunc pertinet ad quoddam officium reddendi justitiam. Sed quando sunt duae partes, Miles Justitiae dicitur quicunque est Miles justus. Conradi igitur Faburiens. vocabulo dicatur Miles Justicus, ut sic à justo distinguatur. Videtur Froissardus lib. 1. ca 177. hunc Militem Justitiae, Chevalier de Loix, Militem juris, appellare. De tribus locutus Militibus, quos Chevaliers vocat: dont les deux (inquit) estoient d' armes, & le tiers de loix: les deux Chevaliers d' armes estoient Monsieur Robert le Clermont gentil & noble grandement; l' autre le Signeur de Constan: le Chevalier de loix estoit Monsieur Simon de Bussy, quem Gulielmus de Nanges ejus aequalis dicit fuisse Conseiller au grand Conseil, i. e. à consiliis Privati Consilii Regis, & primus Praeses Parliamenti. (E Carolo Loyseau pa. 130.) Dicuntur & Juris isti Milites apud Auctorem de la Romant de la Rose, Chivaliers de la lecture, Milites lectionis. Qui veultu pur la foy defendre, Quelque Chevalerie emprendre, Ou soit d' armes, ou soit de lectures, Ou aultres convenables cures. De Loco & tempore Creationis. LOcus quo facti sunt olim Milites non solum solennis fuit propter rei dignitatem; sed etiam sacer: templum, Ecclesia, capella; & in istis pars praecipua, coram Altari. Prementeque aliquando turba (ut in Edouardi I. illis de quibus diximus) super ipsum Altare. Exemplis scatent, quae narravimus. Tantae etiam solennitati dabatur utique solenne Tempus. Ludovicus Pius Imp. ab Episcopis cingitur die Dominica in Ecclesia S. Dionysii. Thegan. pagg. 250. & 253. Sed ad multorum cincturam statuebatur è grandioribus festum aliquod, quo ad Aulam confluentibus regni Magnatibus prodire Rex solebat fastu regio coronatus publice, ut in Natali Domini, Paschate, & Pentecoste. Sic Henric. I. Gaufridum generum suum cum coaevis in festo Pentecostes Rothomagi auctoravit. Henricus III. Alexandrum Regem Scotiae & 20. alios ad Natale Domini, Eboraci. Edovardus I. Edovardum filium suum primogenitum & 300. alios ad festum etiam Pentecostes, ut praedicitur. Praeter haec, & insignes Vestimentorum Apparatus, lautissimis amicos excipiebant Conviviis; ludisque Equestribus & Mavortiis tyrocinii coronabant festivitatem. Unde Vetus illa Lex, ut auxilium Domino Vassalli suggerant ad sumptus obeundos in filium primogenitum faciendo Militem. Contra morem igitur antiquum est, quod hodie nonnulli jactant, se creari in procinctu vel sub dio Milites; alios scioli vellicantes, qui in Regia (sub tapete, aiunt) constituti sunt. Sed horum est manu praestare potius quam ment; Marte quam Minerva; Veritas è praemissis liquet. De Auxilio quod diximus suggerendo, illud apud nos observandum est, ut poscatur solummodo ad filium primogenitum Militem faciendum; haud tamen antequam aetatis annum 15. exegerit. Nec tum (ut olim aliquando) ad libitum Domini; sed modo & quantitate constitutis: hoc est, 20. sol. sterlingorum de quolibet feodo militari, & tantundem pariter de quolibet 20. libratu praedii rustici, quod Soccage vocant. Haec, Statuto Westm. 1. ca 35. An. 3. Edw. I. Et iisdem Rex conclusus est limitibus, Stat. An. 25. Edw. III. cap. 11. De Censu Militari. OLim ingens fuit turba Militum, ut ex eo liqueat, quod Militaris census (feodum vocant) centenis tantum solidis aestimaretur: tum vero quod hujusmodi feodorum sexaginta millia supra in Anglia numerata fuerint, licet singula singulis non conferrentur. Patrimonia vero fuisse videantur justorum Militum sub illis seculis. Vetus enim jus nostrum alios non agnovit Milites, cum relevium Comitis 100 libris; relevium Baronis, 100 marcis; & relevium Militis, 100 solidis, definiverit: id est, juxta unius Anni valorem sui feodi exemplo quod in Lib. de Feudis reperitur. Et videtur insuper ad Militiae apparatum tunc evocari, quotquot liberi & ingenue tenentes, de praediis, centum annuatim numerabant solidos. Crescente vero rerum pretio, Henricus III. evocari tantum jubet, qui 10. libratas terrae habebant, ut Parisu utar verbis in An. Dom. 1256. Anno 37. regni ejus, qui 15. libratas terrae possidebant. Chron. holinsh. pa. 248. col. 1. Edovardus I. anno suo primo, hos qui 20. libratis gaudebant. Stat. de Milib. Henricus VIII. regni sui 25. illos solum qui 40. libras de censu praediali percipiunt. Stow. pa. 946. Modus Exauctorandi Militem; quod Degradare mincupatur. DEgradatur Miles, ademptis per ignominiam judicialiter suae dignitatis symbolis: ut caeteri omnes gradu quolibet insigniti. Ut enim ascribi in militiam nemo potuit non legitime; sic nec solvi a militia. Solutionem autem Missionem vocabant Romani; & haec erat triplex, honesta, causaria, & ignominiosa. ff. de his qui no. infa. l. 2. §. ignominae. Honesta, cum miles consueta stipendia meruisset; quae erant in Praetorianis Cohortibus, annorum 16. in aliis, 20. Tacit. Annal. lib. 1. & L. a. de Veteran. Cod. Theod. & Cod. Just. l. 9 Veteran. fol. 474. d. Causaria, quae propter valetudinem à laboribus Militiae solvit. ff. de his qui no. infa. l. 2. §. ignominiae. Ignominiosa, quae in ignominiam Militis facta est; & duplex suit. 1. Cum is qui mitteret, adjiceret nominatim ignominiae causa se mittere: semper enim (inquit Lex) deb●t addere cur Miles mittatur. 2. Sed si eum exauctoraverit, id est, insignia militaria detraxerit, inter insames efficit, licet non addidisset ignominiae causa se eum exauctorasse. (ibid. fol. 80. b. V. v.. seq. de insamis quid. etc.) Hoc illud Missionis genus est, cui nos jam incumbimus; dabimusque igitur celebre Exemplum ejus ex Herodiano de Severo Imperatore; Praetorianos omnes Milites qui Pertinacem Imp. trucidaverant, pro Tribunali in campo sedente, recingendos exauctorandosque decernente. Post latam sententiam, E vestigio (inquit Herodianus) Milites Illirici concurrunt; Praetoriamsque breves illos gladios detrabunt, quos auro argentoque ornatos in usum pompae suspensos habebant. Tum zonis, vestituque, & caeteris militiae insignibus per vim ablatis, nudos ad unum exauctoratosque dimiserunt. In Severo Sect. 1. pa. 223. To. 11. Ignominiae causa missis neque in urbe, neque alibi ubi Imperator est, morari licet. (ff. de his qui not. intam. §. Miles. fol. 80.) Ind Aemilius Macer, qui ignominia missus est, neque Romae, neque in sacro Comitatu agere potest. (In l. milites. §. ignominiosa, ff. de re milit.) Hinc exauctorandi nostri Militis Aurati caeremonia. Auctorari autem dicitur, cum quis ad aliquid faciendum obligatur, ut miles ad militiam, etc. Exauctorari hic igitur est, ab obligatione militari solutum esse: quae solutio & dignitatem tollit, & annexa Privilegia. Vulgo dicitur Degradatio, quia gradum tollit. Fit igitur omnis Exauctoratio seu Degradatio, auferendo per ignominiam judicialiter ipsa eadem insignia, quibus collata est dignitas vel gradus; cum in secularibus tum in Ecclesiasticis; ut sigillatim ostenderem, si prolixitatis non puderet. Sequemur igitur quod in Thesi est; & omissis Romanorum exemplis, recentiora quaedam proferemus. Memorabilis est prae caeteris omnibus male-sana illa Exauctoratio Ludovici Pii Imperatoris Christianissimi ab Episcopis An. Dom. 917. Compendii perpetrata: Longa est injuria, longae ambages; quas in Auctoribus illius seculi, & nominatim in Libello; qui Tegano subjungitur, Exauctoratio Ludovici Pii nuncupato, fuse legas. Coëgerunt autem mitissimum Principem (ut recentius Angli Ricardum II.) reatuum quos imposuerant articulis subscribere, poenitentiamque cum tristissima confessione profiteri. Post hanc Confessionem (inquit Auctor) Chartulam suorum reatuum, & Confessionis, ob futuram memoriam Sacerdotibus tradidit, quam ipsi super Altare posuerunt: ac deinde cingulum Militiae deposuit & super Altare collocavit, & habitu seculi se exuens, habitum Poenitentis per impositionem manuum Episcoporum accepit; ut post tantam talemque poenitentiam, nemo ultra ad militiam secularem redeat. p. 147. & seq. Vides hanc Exauctorationem retrograde fieri eisdem vestigiis quibus sub hoc seculo ipsa facta est Militis (ut loquuntur) Creatio seu auctoratio. A Viris Ecclesiasticis, in Ecclesia, coram Altari, praemissis confessione & poenitentia, solutione cinguli militaris, ejusdemque repositione super Altare unde in Auctoratione desumptum fuit; exuto etiam demum seculari, hoc est militari, habitu, ut nunquam postea ad militiam esset redeundum. Haec de morbo illius tempestatis: recolitur tamen Imperator denuo & cingulo militari ab ipsis Episcopis (ut supra diximus) & omnibus aliis suis insignibus. Exauctoratur & circa hoc tempus, paulo anterius, Odo quidam Ludovici familiaris, armis scil. ablatis, ipsoque in exilium deportato. Vit. Lud. Pii, p. 238. Notandum autem est, sub voce Cingulum, intelligenda arma omnia, & ipsam militandi facultatem: eoque sensu in Historiis, Conciliis, & Jure Caesareo passim occurrere cingulum tollere, amittere, perdere, & hujusmodi. Accedo ad viciniora, & nostratia. Andreas Harkela Miles Auratus & Comes Carliolensis, sub An. Dom. 1323. seu 17. Edw. II. reus agitur coram Gausrido de Scrope summo Justitiario Regii Tribunalis (ut quidam perhibent,) vel Antonio de Lucy (qui eum comprehenderat) ut alii referunt; recte coram utroque, de re Anglorum Scoto prodenda. Cumque lata esset sententia, ut spoliatus tam Comitiva dignitate quam Militari, morte pro more Traditoris afficeretur: statutus est ad repagulum Tribunalis, ocre●s, calcaribus, pellito collobio, vestibusque aliis Comitivis indutus. Prodiens tunc, ex mandato Antonii, ribaldus quidam, calcaria primum ab Harcleae calcibus detruncat; fractoque super capite ejus Comitivo gladio, quem in custodiam tutelamque Comitatus Rex ei praebuerat, vestibus spoliat & cingulo militari. Spoliatum denique sic alloquitur Antonius. Ribaldus jam efficeris & tu ipse Andreas, qui nuper Miles fueras & vir dignitatis. Proditionem vero suspendio lues, tractus, evisceratus, & intestinis crematis, quadrifariam dissectus, capiteque minutus, etc. Codex Vernac. MS. Ca 195. Specimen aliud habes à Radulpho de Grey, qui cum fidem Regi Edovardo IV. juratam fefellisset; captusque postea, in Castello Bamburgensi supremam subiturus esset sententiam; Comes Worcestriae Constabularius Angliae pro Tribunali sedens, reum his affatur: Radulphe, statuerat Rex tuae proditionis ergo, ut calcaria tibi juxta ipsos calcaneos ab archimagiro (quem praesto hic vides praecinctum lint●o, & instructum cultro) discuterentur. Adsunt etiam ex mandato Regis (ut ipse hic vides) Rex Armorum & Heraldi alii cum tunica insignium tuorum militarium, quam à corpore tuo dilacerantes avellerent, ut tam nobilitatis tuae & insignium Gentilitiorum spoliareris, quam dignitatis tuae militaris. En & alia tunica tuorum armorum reverso ordine depictorum, qua ad supplicium raptus induereris, tanquam ex jure ad te pertinente. Degradationem tamen tuam à militari dignitate, armorumque & Nobilitatis tuae ademptionem remisit & pepercit tibi Rex; corum memor, quae praeclarus avus tuus in causa illustrissimorum praedecessorum ipsius Regis passus est. Lato tandem judicio, ad supplicium tractus est truncatusque capite, ut Stowus refert: sed ut Fabianus, tractus, suspensus, & quadripartitus, An. Dom. 1464. Regis 4. Consedente pro Tribunali regio in aula Westm. D. Thoma Howard Comite Arundelio summo Angliae Comite Marescallo, auream ferente muneris sui virgam, adjunctis a dextra & à sinistra— Franciscus à ministro ad repagulum Curiae adducitur, & parte interiori super scamno collocatur è regione D. Marescalli; stans & vestitu quo solet palliatus, sed ocreis & calcaribus auratis indutus, gladioque cinctus qui per Baltheum coriaceum à dextro humero ad sinistrum dependebat latus. Facto silentio legebatur publice ab Heraldo libellus, reatum suum & sententiam inferioris conclavis Parlamentarii continens. Quo finito, corrigia calcariorum ejus discidit—; arreptaque calcaria projiciebat in aulam: deinde discidit baltheum, curavitque ut gladi●s in terram caderet: quia in militaribus Exercitiis lateri ignominiae sit, si qua pars armorum ad terram ceciderit; ideoque Heraldorum juris est. FINIS. HISTORIA FAMILIAE DE SHARNBURN. E veteri MS. recensuit D. HENRICUS SPELMANNUS. HEN. SPELMANNUS Lectori. Non vulgar vides Monumentum; forte videbis Haud duo praeterea talia, siqua vides. No vulgar Monument you see, scarce two The like you'll find, if any one you do. HISTORIA FAMILIAE DE SHARNBURN. LOngo tempore post adventum Saxonum Paganorum in Angliam, fuit quidam Thokus qui fuit Paganus Dominus de integra villa de Shenebruina, & habuit unam filiam, quam dedit cuidam homini strenuo vocato Ingolf; & cum ea dedit ei totam terram & mariscum quod ipse habuit versus occidentem praedictae villae de Shenebruina usque mare, ubi ipse Ingolf quandam villam fecit, & vocavit illam nomine suo Ingolfestorp. Et Sanctus Foelix quando venit de Burgundia per consilium Honorii Archiepiscopi Cantuar. applicuit in partibus Estanglorum quae postea dicta fuit Norfolchia & Suffolchia, & convertit ad fidem Eorpwaldum Regem illius patriae & baptizavit eum, viz. An. Dom. ..... Et postea per licentiam praedicti Eorpwaldi Regis ivit per mare versus partes occidentales illius patriae, & applicuit apud Babynglee, & convertit ad fidem Dominum & omnes homines illius terrae, & fecit ibidem aedificari unam Ecclesiam, quae fuit prima Ecclesia illius partis Norff. Et deinde ivit ad Shenebruinam & baptizavit praedictum Thokum, & omnes homines suos, & praecepit ei ut ipse faceret ibi unam Ecclesiam, & fecit ibi unam parvam Ecclesiam de Meremio, quae vocabatur per longum tempus le Stoke Chappel, & postea fuit dedicata per praedictum Sanctum Foelicem in honorem Apostolorum Petri & Pauli, & sic fuit illa Ecclesia in Shenebruina secunda Ecclesia illius partis Norff. & ita fuit praedictus Thokus effectus Christianus, & tota vita sua fuit Dominus de integra villa de Shenebruina, & haeredes ejus similiter post eum fuerunt Domini ejusdem villae usque Canutus Rex Danorum conquestus fuit Angliam. Quo tempore quaedam puella de progenie praedicti Thoki, & haeres sua linealiter descendendo fuit Domina de integra villa de Shenebruina Nota praedicta, quae desponsata fuit cuidam Edwyno, qui venit in Angliam cum praedicto Canuto Rege Daniae, ut patet in sequenti. Edwinus Dacus venit de Dacia (i e. Denmark) in Angliam cum Canuto Rege Danorum Anno Domini millesimo XIV. quando ipse Canutus debellavit cum Edredo Rege Angliae, & post mortem praedicti Edredi ipse Canutus pluries pugnavit cum Rege Edmundo Ironsyde filio praedicti Edredi, & ad ultimum concordati fuerunt, ita quod praedictus Edmundus haberet totam Angliam ex parte Australi Thamysiae, & praedictus Canutus haberet aliam partem Angliae ex parte Boriali praedictae Thamysiae, quo tempore idem Canutus dedit praedicto Edwyno villam de Neteshamia integram cum toto dominio integro & plures alias terras in Comit. Norff. Et similiter dedit ei unam planiciem non cultam sed vastatam, versus Orientem à praedicta villa per sex miliaria Anglicana, ubi idem Edwynus invenit quendam collem, & hogum petrosum, & ibi ipse incipiebat aedificare quandam villam & vocavit 〈…〉 illam Stonhogia, quae postea vocabatur Stanhowe. Et postea ipse Edwynus desponsavit quandam puellam, quae fuit Domina de integra villa de Shenebruina; & cito postquam desponsabat illam ipse cepit praedictam villam, quam habuit cum uxore sua de Canuto Rege, tenendam de ipso insimul cum donationibus, quas illi prius dederat; & sic fuit ipse Edwynus Dominus integrè de praedictis villis, & obtinuit omnia praedicta in pace quousque Willielmus Bastardus Dux Normannorum cepit Angliam super Haraldum Regem, qui coronatus fuit Rex apud Westm. An. Dom. millesimo LXVI. Et post coronationem ipse dedit diversas terras in Anglia diversis hominibus, qui secum venerunt in auxilio ad Angliam conquirendam. Inter quas dedit Willielmo de Albeney Pincernae suo, & Willielmo de Warennia forestario suo diversas terras, & dominationes in Comit. Norff. & alibi in Anglia: & praedicti Willielmus Pincerna, & Willielmus de Warennia, & omnes alii qui venerunt cum praedicto Conquestore ejecerunt diversos homines infra dominationes suas omnibus de terris, & dominationibus suis; inter quos praedicti Willielmus Pincerna, & Willielmus de Warennia ejecerunt praedictum Edwynum de praedictis duabus villis, & omnibus aliis terris, & dominationibus suis. Propter quod idem Edwynus, & alii quidam qui ejecti fuerunt abierunt ad Conquestorem, & dixerunt ei, quod nunquam ante conquestum suum, nec in conquestu suo, nec post fuerunt contra ipsum Regem in consilio & auxilio, sed tenuerunt se in pace, & hoc parati fuerunt probare, quomodo ipse Rex vellet ordinare, propter quod idem Rex fecit inquirendum per totam Angliam, si ita fuit, quod quidem probatum fuit; propter quod idem Rex praecepit ut omnes illi qui sic tenuerunt se in pace in forma praedicta, quod ipsi retinerent omnes terras, & dominationes suas adeo integre & in pace, ut unquam habuerunt & tenuerunt ante conquestum suum, & quod ipsi imposterum vocarentur Drenges; super quod idem Rex ad sectam praedicti Edwyni mandavit praedictis Willielmo Pincernae, & Willielmo de Warrenia quod ipsi deliberarent praedicto Edwyno omnes terras, & dominationes suas ex quibus ejecerunt eum, qui inde nihil voluerunt facere; sed praedictus Willielmus Pincerna dedit eidem Edwyno unum messuagium, CCC. acras terras, & tres faldas in Snetesham, qui inantea vocabatur Netesham tenendas de eodem Willielmo Pincerna per certa servitia & retinuit ad opus suum & opus Willielmi de Warrenna residuum praedictae villae de Snetsham, unde ipsi feoffaverunt alios de hominibus suis qui secum venerunt de Normannia. Et praedictus Willielmus de Warrenna dedit similiter eidem Edwyno unum messuagium, CCCC. acras terrae, & quatuor faldas in Sharnebourne cum dominio ejusdem villae quae inantea vocabatur Shenebruina tenendas per certa servitia de cadem Willielmo de Warrenna, & retinuit ad opus suum residuum ejusdem villae de Sharneburn cum advocatione Ecclesiae, unde ipse feoffavit alios de hominibus suis qui secum de Normannia venerunt. Et post istas dominationes factas praedicto Edwyno per praedictos Willielmum Pincernam, & Willielmum de Warrenna, Dominus Rad. de ●or●neys qui similiter venit in Angliam cum praedicto Conquestore, & cui idem Rex dedit terram de Suthm. cum membris in Comit. Norff. cepit praedictum Edwynum, & ipsum incarceravit, perque longum tempus in prisona detinuit, quousque idem Edwynus evasit per noctem extra prisonam, & abiit praedicto Willielmo Pincernae, & fecit ei querimoniam de injuria sibi facta, & supplicavit ●i ut ipse posset tenere de illo praedictam villam de Stanhowe, qui noluit, sed ipse cum Willielmo de Warrenna ceperunt praedictam villam de Stanhowe, in manibus suis & praedictus Willielmus Pincerna dedit praedicto Edwyno unum messuagium, CCCC. acras terrae & quatuor faldas in praedicta villa de Stanhowe tenendas de eo per servicium XLd. per annum, & residuum ejusdem villae de Stanhowe cum advocatione Ecclesiae retinuit ad opus suum & ad opus Willielmi de Warrenna qui inde feoffaverunt alios de hominibus suis qui secum venerunt de Normannia, ut supradictum est. Et postea idem Willielmus Pincerna mandavit in Normandiam pro una filia Bastarda sua, quam ibi procreavit ante adventum suum in Angliam & illam dedit A●●euro filio praedicti Edwyni, & per hoc fuit idem Edwynus in pace tota vita sua, ita quod nullus ausus fuerit postea ei injuriam facere nec damnum. Et praedictus Edwynus cito post praedictum maritagium obiit in senectute sua post multas tribulationes suas tempore praedicti Regis Willielmi Conquestoris. De quo Asceurus, ut supradictum est, qui desponsavit filiam Willielmi Asceurus Pincernae bastardam, ut supradictum est, & tenuit totam haereditatem suam in pace post mortem praedicti Edwyni patris sui, & obiit in senectute sua in ultimis annis regni Regis Stephani. Et ipse Asceurus procreavit de uxore sua praedicta tres filios & plures filias, & ipse Asceurus divisit praedictis tribus filiis suis totam haereditatem suam. De quibus Galfredus filius praedicti Primus ●iliu● 〈◊〉. Asceuri primogenitus desponsavit Etheldredam filiam Rogeri de Dersyngham, & ipsa fuit pulcherrima domina, quia inantea ipsa desponsabatur Domina Fulconi de Sharneburn, & similiter post mortem praedicti Galfredi illa Domina desponsabatur Domino Rogero Rustengs, ut patet alibi, & iste Galfredus suit Capitalis Seneschallus Willielmi Comitis Arundelliae, filii praedicti Willielmi Pincernae, de omnibus terris suis tam in Anglia quam in Normannia. Et idem Galfredus procreav it de praedicta Etheldreda uxore sua tres filios & tres filias, ut patet inferius, & idem Galfredus obiit die Sanctae Agathae virginis, tempore Regis Henrici secundi filii Matildis Imperatricis, & praedicta Domina Etheldreda obiit die Sancti Cuthberti tempore Regis Johannis. Secundus filius Asceuri & eju●●●itus. Ricardus secundus filius praedicti Asceuri desponsavit Amiciam filiam ..... de Lynnea veteri in partibus Mershlandiae ex parte occidentali Ripae, & cum illa habuit ibi magnam haereditatem, de quibus Robertus, qui vendidit totam haereditatem, quam habuit in partibus Mershlandiae antecessoribus Jacobi Baynard; de quo Roberto exivit Ricardus, de quo Robertus, de quo Petrus, de quo Sabina & Petronella, & plures filii & filiae, & praedicta Sabina desponsata fuit Johanni filio Philippi Pynchom de Castle-Rising, & praedicta Petronella nupta suit Johanni filio Radulphi Panton de Dockyngs. Tertius filius praedicti Asceuri. Robertus tertius filius praedicti Asceuri obtinuit multa beneficia Ecclesiastica in diversis locis cum Decanatu Lenniae, & habuit tres filias. Unde prima filia desponsabatur cuidam Willielmo filio Radulphi de Snetesham, & secunda filia nupta fuit cuidam Hamundo de Snetesham; & tertia filia nupta fuit cuidam Waltero de Snetesham. Et de praedictis Willielmo filio Radulphi, & uxore sua filia praedicti Roberti filii Asceuri exivit Radulphus, & plures filii & filiae, de praedicto Radulpho secundo exivit Willielmus, de quo quaedam puella quae nupta fuit Galfredo de Say de Dersyngham, de quibus Galfredus de Say, qui vendidit totam haereditatem, quae ei descendebat post mortem Matris suae, cuidam Hervio Vnderburg de Bennham & aliis hominibus de Snetesham, & de praedictis Hamundo & uxore sua secunda filia praedicti Roberti filii Asceuri exivit Galfredus, de quo Alanus, de quo Galfredus, de quo Wymerus, de quo Robertus Wymer, qui vendidit totam haereditatem suam in Snetesham, Sharneburn, & Dockyng Domino Johanni de Ingoldesthorp & aliis hominibus. Et de praedictis Waltero & uxore sua tertia, filia praedicti Roberti filii Asceuri exivit Galfredus, de quo Galfredus, de quo Johannes, qui vendidit totam haereditatem suam in Stanhowe Andreae de Sharnebourne secundo & totam haereditatem suam in Snetesham, & Sharneburne vendidit aliis diversis hominibus de quo Thomas Bulwer de Snetesham. Modo dicendum est de Etheldreda quae fuit uxor Galfredi filii Asceuri; Rogerus de Dersyngham fuit quidem homo dives ex nobili progenie & habuit unum filium, qui vocabatur Robertus de Dersyngham post mortem patris sui, & unam filiam pulcherrimam quae vocabatur Etheldreda, & Dominus Fulco de Sharnebourn in equitando versus Lennam vidit illam stantem juxta viam in Dersyngham, & ipsam concupivit propter pulchritudinem suam, & tam cito quam ipse rediit in domum suam ipse mandavit praedicto Rogero, ut ei vellet dare praedictam Etheldredam filiam suam in uxorem. Quo letaliter concedente & Primus ma●●tus Etheldredae, & 〈◊〉 ●●itus. cum ea multam pecuniam promittendo, dictus Dominus Fulco ipsam desponsavit & ex eadem Etheldreda procreavit dominum Eudonem de Scharnburn, & plures filios & filias. Et de ipso Eudone exivit Galfredus & plures filii & filiae, & idem Galfredus desponsavit Rosamundam filiam Will. filii Roberti de Ingoldsthorp consanguineam domini Thomae de Ingoldstorp senioris, de quibus Will. & plures filii & filiae, de quo Galfredus & plures filii & filiae, de quo Willielmus, Thomas & Johannes & duae filiae, & praedicti Willielmus, Thomas & Johannes obierunt, & praedictus Willielmus post mortem filiorum suorum dedit domino 〈…〉. Andreae de Sharneburn quarto totam haereditatem suam. Et post mortem praedicti domini Fulconis praedicta domina Etheldreda desponsabatur Galfrido filio Asceuri, ut supradictum est, qui ex ea procreavit tres filios & quatuor filias, 〈…〉. ut patet inferiu●. Et post mortem praedicti Galfredi filii Asceuri praedicta domina Etheldreda desponsabatur tertio domino Rogero de Rusteyng, qui fuit Capitalis Senescallis Willielmi Comitis Arundelliae tertii, & idem Rogerus antequam desponsavit praedictam Etheldredam factus fuit Miles in terra Sancta de Jerusalem tempore Regis Ricardi de manu praedicti domini Willielmi Comitis tertii. Et post reditum suum de Jerusalem ipse desponsavit praedictam Etheldredam, ut supradictum est, qui ex ea procreavit dominum Willielmum & plures filios & filias. It de ipso Willielmo exivit dominus Willielmus secundus, & dominus Rogerus Rusteyngus Rector Ecclesiae de Ingoldsthorp & Freyngz. Et de ipso Willielmo secundo exivit Willielmus tertius & quatuor filiae, videlicet. Milicentia prima filia, quae desponsata fuit domino Reginaldo de Sancto Martino fundatore Canonicorum de Hempton. Alicia secunda filia desponsata fuit domino Waltero de Wygenhall. Margareta tertia filia desponsata fuit domino Johanni de Wedale. Beatrix quarta filia desponsata fuit Gilberto de Tuckwell. ●t praedicta domina Etheldreda post mortem praedicti domini Rogeri viri sui nunquam fuit desponsata, & ipsa vixit sola ad totam vitam suam sine viro. Et obiit die Sancti Cuthberti tempore Regis Johannis. 〈…〉. Modo dicendum est de filiis & filiabus Galfredi filii Asceuri & praedictae Etheldredae uxoris suae. Dominus Alanus fuit primus filius praedictorum Galfredi & Etheldredae, & factus fuit miles in terra Sancta de Jerusalem tempore Regis Ricardi de manu Comitis Willielmi Arundellii tertii, eo tempore quo dominus Rogerus Rusteyng secundus fuit miles, & cum eodem Alano fuit ibidem tune temporis Petrus frater praedicti Alani. Et idem dominus Alanus in tota vita sua non habuit uxorem nec exitum, nisi unum filium bastardum, qui vocabatur Robertus de Sharneburn, & aliquando Robertus filius Alani de Sharneburn communiter Robertus de Hall; & idem dominus Alanus obiit tertio die Junii 〈…〉 tempore Regis Ricardi. Dominus Andreas secundus filius praedictorum Galfredi, & Etheldredae factus fuit miles in terra Sancta de Jerusalem tempore Regis Johannis de manu Willielmi Comitis Arundelliae quarti. Et post reditum suum de terra Sancta ipse desponsavit Susannam filiam domini Benedicti de Ang●ivilla, domini de Westnewton, Suyton & Herlyngs, & cum praedicta Susanna ipse habuit totam tertiam partem totius haereditatis praedicti Benedicti, sed nullum exitum habuerunt inter ipsos, propter quod ipse non tenuit praedictam tertiam partem nisi ad totam vitam praedictae Susannae; & post mortem ipsius Susannae idem dominus de Andreas desponsavit Aliciam quae fuit uxor Sylvestris de Risinges, sed nullum exitum habuerunt inter ipsos. Et praedicta domina A●●cia super vixit praedictum dominum Andream virum suum, & ibidem dominus Andreas obiit die Sancti Alphegi Episcopi, Anno Dom. millesimo CC. XLIX. & Regni Regis Henrici filii Regis Johannis XXXIV. Et sepultus est apud Sharneburn in Capella coram Altarem Beatae Mariae, prope 〈…〉 parietem Australem. Petrus tertius filius praedictorum Galfredi & Etheldredae in redeundo de terra Sancta de Jerusalem cum domino Alano fratre suo remansit retro praedictum Alanum in Francia cum quodam magno Domino illius patriae, qui non habuit haeredem nisi unam filiam pulcherrimam, quam 〈…〉 praedictus Petrus incipiebat amare, & illa consentiente eidem Petro * & tempore praedicti amoris pater puellae praedictae obiit, & sic illa puella remansit sola, & sine consilio nisi de matre sua. Quo tempore dictus dominus Andreas de Sharneburn frater praedicti Petri, antequam ipse factus fuit miles, ivit in terram Sanctam de Jerusalem, cum Willielmo Comite Arundelliae quarto, & venit in illa parte Franciae ubi praedictus Petrus remansit, & fecit ipsum ●re secum in terram Sanctam, & post reversionem praedicti Andreae idem Petrus remansit cum praedicta puella & matre sua. Quo tempore ipsa puella fuit praegnans per praedictum Petrum, & peperit unam filiam, & in secundo anno postquam praedicta puella fuit deliberata de filia sua praedicta, idem Petrus audivit dicere, quod Susanna, quae fuit uxor praedicti Andreae fratris sui, fuit mortua sine liberis, propter quod ipse Petrus desideravit ire in Angliam ad fratrem suum; & venit ad praedictam puellam, & petiit licentiam ab ea, ut ipse possit redire in Angliam ad loquendum cum fratre suo, & illa ei concedit licentiam malevole, & tristi corde, & dixit praedicto Petro, Modo scio bene, quod quam citius venies ad hospitium habebis me in oblivione, & tibi capies aliam uxorem; & idem Petrus dixit quod non, & hoc affirmabat per juramentum & fidem suam dando, & tunc illa dixit tali conditione expectabo te per septem annos, ita quod non capiam maritum nec ullum virum donec praedicti septem anni erunt elapsi. Et tunc idem Petrus rediit in Angliam, & antequam ipse perventus fuit ad hospitium, praedictus dominus Andreas desponsavit Aliciam, quae fuit uxor Sylvestri de Rysinge, qui receperunt praedictum Petrum letanter, & cum magno gaudio: & post pusillum idem dominus Andreas & Alicia uxor ejus dixerunt eidem Petro, ut ipse desponsaret Ceciliam filiam praedictorum Sylvestri & Aliciae, & ipse nullo modo voluit consentire, nec concedere, propter quod idem dominus Andreas multum irascebatur versus praedictum Petrum, & dixit ei, si nollet ipsam Ceciliam desponsare quod nunquam deberet esse haeres suus post mortem suam. Et quia praedictus Petrus bene sciebat, quod praedictus dominus Andreas & domina Alicia nunquam habuerunt haeredem de corporibus eorum, & ipse timuit quod idem dominus Andreas in ira sua ipsum dishaeredaret, ipse desponsavit praedictam Ceciliam tali conditione quod nunquam dishaeredaretur, & praedictus Andreas hoc concedens, & per juramentum affirmans dedit ei, & praedictae Ceciliae uxori ejus situm manerii sui in Snetesham, & terram suam in eadem villa de Snetesham. Et praedictus Petrus genuit de praedicta Cecilia quinque filios & unam filiam, ut patet inferius. Et praedictus Petrus post mortem praedictae Ceciliae rediit in Franciam ad praedictam puellam, quam ipse prius amabat, & quam citius ipsa puella ipsum vidit dixit ei, quod ipse fregisset conventionem quam ipse secerat, quia septem anni fuerunt translati multo tempore elapso; & dixit, bene scio quod duxisti uxorem; & ipse respondit quod non haberet uxorem, sed non potuit denegare, quod ipse habuit uxorem quae mortua est, & dixit quod hoc fecit per cohortationem ratione dishaeredationis suae, & tam cito quam ipsa hoc audivit juravit, quod nunquam caperet ipsum nec alium virum, sed ipsa viveret sola sine viro tota vita sua, & maritaret filiam suam, quam ipse Petrus procreavit; & idem Petrus hoc audiente juravit similiter, quod ipse nunquam haberet uxorem; sed solus viveret sine muliere tota vita sua, & sic fecit, & postea idem Petrus ivit ad Comitem de Campania, & cum ipso fuit per longum tempus quousque ipse audivit de morte domini Andreae fratris sui. Quo audito ipse rediit in Angliam, & venit apud Sharnburn, & ibi vixit tota vita sua cum filiis suis, & obiit vivente praedicta domina Alicia, videlicet in Vigilia Sancti Andreae Apostoli, Anno Dom. millesimo CC. LIX. & Regni Regis Henrici filii Regis Johannis XLIV. & sepultus est in Capella Ecclesiae de Sharnburn coram Altari Beatae Mariae, juxta dominum Andream fratrem suam ex parte boreali. Prima filia Galfredi & Etheldredae, & ejus exitus. Prima filia praedictorum Galfredi & Etheldredae vocata Matildis desponsata fuit domino Nicholao filio Radulphi Dockyng, item dominus Ricardus de Senges, dominus de Berwick, dedit plures terras in Dockyng, & alibi in maritagio cum praedicta Matilde, de quibus dominus Ricardus, de quo dominus Nicholaus, de quo Ricardus qui vendidit totam haereditatem domino Johanni Lovel seniori, & aliis diversis hominibus de quo Nicholaus of Hall, pauper manens apud Norwic. Secunda filia praedictorum Galfredi & Etheldredae vocata ..... desponsata 〈…〉 suit domino Alano filio Robert● de Ingoldsthorp, de quibus dominus Thomas qui vocabatur 〈◊〉 Thomas, de quo dominus Thomas qui suit Vice-Comes Norff. de ●uo 〈◊〉 Johannes, qui suit ad Baneram in guerra cum Edwardo Rege 〈◊〉 de ●●o dominus Thomas, de quo dominus Johannes, de quo dominus 〈…〉 Ingoldsthorp. 〈…〉 〈…〉 praedictorum Galfredi & Etheldredae vocata ..... desponsata suit 〈◊〉 Nicholas de Testes, de quibus dominus Rogerus, de quo Thomas, 〈…〉 patre suo, de quo Rogerus ultimus. Quarta 〈◊〉 praedictorum Galfredi & Etheldredae vocata Isabella desponsata 〈…〉 suit ..... de quibus Matildis, quae desponsata suit Albino de Stamford manenti in 〈…〉 de quibus Johannes Aubyn de Hillyngton, & Ricardus Aubyn D●●anus de He●●am. Modo dicendum est de domina Alicia, quae fuit uxor domini Andreae de 〈◊〉 de primo viro suo, domina Alicia, antequam ipsa desponsabatur domino Andrew de Sharnburn, desponsata suit Sylvestro de Rysings cuidam homini diviti multas habens terras in Rysings, West-Newton & alibi, de quibus Cecilia quae desponsata fuit Petro de Sharnburn, ut patet superius, & quaedam alia filia quae desponsata suit Thom●e Sorel de Oldlynne seniori. Et unus filius qui vocabatur Willielmus Sylvestre, de quo Andreas Sylvestras manens in Congham, de quo Cecilia quae desponsata fuit Willielmo Attechirch de Wulfurton seniori, & Alicia quae desponsata fuit Adae A●ary de Sharnburn seniori. Et praedicta domina Alicia fieri fecit Cancellam de Sharnburn, & sepulta est in eadem Cancella, & ipsa obut tertio Idus Sept. Anno Dom. millesimo CC. LX. & Regni Regis Henrici filii Johannis XLV. Et Cecilia quae suit uxor Petri de Sharnburn obiit XI. Cal. Oct. Modo dicendum est de exitu Petri de Sharnburn, 〈…〉 & Ceciliae uxoris ejus. Johannes filius praedictorum Petri & Ceciliae primogenitus obiit sine haerede de se procreato vivente patre suo, vid. VII. Idus Nou. Andreas secundus filius praedictorum Petri & Ceciliae vivente patre suo desponsavit Emmam sororem Magistri Godofredi de Toftes Rys, quondam Rectoris 〈…〉 de Hunstanston, de quibus exivit una filia ut patet inferius, & praedicta Emma obiit III. Cal. Oct. & sepulta est in Coemeterio Ecclesiae de Sharnburn, ex parte Australi Capellae prope parietem. Et post mortem praedictae Emmae idem Andreas desponsavit Christianam filiam domini Alani le Gross de Wodenorton de quibus exivit unus filius, & duae filiae, ut patet inferius. Et praedictus Andreas obiit VII. Kal. Julii, An. Dom. millesimo CC. LXXXII. Regni Regis Edwardi filii Regis Henrici X. Et sepultus fuit in Capella Ecclesiae de Sharnburn, ad caput domini Andreae sub pariete Australi. Et praedicta Christiana post mortem praedicti Andreae desponsata fuit Edmundo filio domini Johannis de Gylham de Dersyngham, & vixit per longum tempus post mortem praedicti Edmundi; videlicet usque festum Sancti Lucae Evangelistae, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XXXVI. & Regni Regis Edwardi tertii post conquestum decimo. 〈…〉 Walterus tertius filius praedictorum Petri & Ceciliae fuit Armiger, cum domino Thoma Rostelyn seniori nobili homine & probo tota vita ipsius domini Thomae, & cum ipso fuit ad bellum de Lewes & Evesham ex parte Regis Henrici, & Edwardi filii sui, & postea idem Walterus fuit cum praedicto domino Thoma in terra Sancta de Jerusalem, in ultimis annis praedicti Henrici Regis in societate praedicti Edwardi. Et idem Walterus post reditum suum de terra Sancta procreavit de Juliana filia Adae Rydout senioris unum filium, & tres filias Bastardas, ut patet inferius, & postea per longum tempus ipse per cohortationem Ecclesiasticam desponsavit praedictum Julianam, contra voluntatem suam, quia ipse Walterus amabat filiam praedicti domini Thomae, quae desponsata fuit domino Roberto Turtevill, & post mortem ejusdem domini Roberti ipsa debuit desponsari praedicto Waltero, sed perturbata fuit per praedictam Julianam, & post mortem ejusdem Julianae ipse vixit solus sine muliere usque in ultimis diebus vitae suae. Et quando Edwardus Rex primus post Conquestorem cepit crucem eundo in terram Sanctam, ipse Walterus cepit crucem, & signatus fuit in carne super humerum dextrum, sed non fecit peregrinationem dictam in vita sua, quia Rex non fecit. Et postea in ultimo anno vitae suae desponsavit Margeriam filiam Stephani de Geyton, & ex ea procreavit unum filium, ut patet inferius. Et eadem Margeria supervixit praedictum Walterum▪ per longum tempus, & praedictus Walterus obiit pridie Cal. Octobris, Anno Dom. millesimo CCC. VII. & Regni Regis Edwardi filii Regis Edwardi primo, & sepultus est extra Capellam de Sharnburn, ad caput orientale. Et praedicta Margeria obiit in pestilencia, videlicet die Sabbati Idus Junii Anno Dom. millesimo CC. XLIX. & sepulta est ad ostium australe Ecclesiae de Sharnburn. Quartus filius Petri, & Ceciliae. Philippus quartus filius praedictorum Petri & Ceciliae, fuit Armiger cum domino Hugone Peche, & cum ipso fuit ad bellum de Lewes, & Evesham contra Regem & Edwardum filium suum, & postea in Insulâ de Ely cum praedicto Hugone, propter quod ipse Philippus exulabatur ex Anglia, & obiit in Francia ad villam, quae dicitur Sancta Maria de Pertico, & ibi duxit uxorem, & suscitavit prolem, & ibi fuit tota vita sua. Quintus filius Petri, & Ceciliae. Robertus quintus filius praedictorum Petri & Ceciliae, fuit Armiger cum domino Johanne de la Hay, & cum co fuit ad bellum de Lewes, & Evesham contra Regem, & Edwardum filium suum, & in Insula de Ely cum praedicto domino Johanne, unde postea habuit pacem Regis, & venit ad hospitium ad Andream fratrem suum, & ibi postea cito obiit sine liberis. Filia Petri & Ceciliae. Alicia filia praedictorum Petri & Ceciliae desponsata fuit Galfredo Curtemanche seniori filio Galfredi Capellani filii Briani de Snetesham, & antequam desponsabatur decepta fuit, ita quod fuit praegnans de praedicto Galfredo, & habuit unum filium Bastardum qui vocabatur Galfredus Curtemanche junior, de quo Robertus ..... Et post matrimonium illa habuit tres filios & unam filiam, videlicet Andreas qui obiit sine haeredibus, Robertus, Johannes & Johanna, quae nupta fuit apud Shuldham. De Roberto secundo filio in matrimonio exivit Willielmus Thesaurizarius Comit. de Warwick. & sex filiae, videlicet Alicia, ..... Alicia desponsata fuit Rogero de London Civi Coventriae, Beatrix, & Oliva desponsata Willielmo Bishop de Sharnburn, & Johanna ..... Et praedictus Petrus Bastardi praedicti Petri. de Sharnburn, habuit plures filios & filias Bastardoes, quorum nomina ignorantur nisi de tribus filiabus, videlicet Etheldreda, Christiana, & Juliana, quae desponsata fuit Galfredo Rydout seniori, de quo Galfredus, Juliana. Et praedictus Petrus post mortem Ceciliae uxoris suae, & domini Andreae fratris sui factus fuit miles in senectute sua de manu Hugonis de Aubeny, Pincernae ultimi Comitis de integro Comitatu Arundelliae. Modo dicendum est de exitu Andreae de Sharnburn secundi. Prima filia Andreae secundi. Andreas de Sharnburn secundus de Emma prima uxore sua habuit unam filiam, quae vocabatur Alicia, quae habuit totam haereditatem praedicti Andreae patris sui post mortem fratris sui junioris. Et praedicta Alicia primo desponsabatur Jacobo Styward de Hulmo juxta mare, & secundo Ricardo de Gernestone Burgensi Lenniae, & non habuit exitum de praedictis viris suis; sed obiit sine haerede de corpore suo, videlicet X. Kal. Aug. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. IX. & Regni Regis Edu. filii Regis Edu. tertio incipiente. Et sepulta est apud Lenniam in Ecclesia Sanctae Margaretae, in uno Archo ex parte Australi. Et idem Andreas secundus de Christiana secunda uxore sua habuit unum filium, & duas filias, videlicet Andreas tertius qui non fuit nisi de duobus annis vivente Filius Andreae secundi. patre suo, & non vixit post mortem patris sui, nisi duobus annis & dimidio, & sic obiit sine haerede de corpore suo procreato, III. Non. Dec. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. LXXXIV. & Regni Regis Edwardi filii Regis Henrici XIII. incipiente, & sepultus fuit in Capella ad pedes patris sui extra parietem. Secunda filia Andreae secundi. Cecilia filia praedictorum Andreae & Christinae, obiit sine haerede in puerili aetate sua cito, post mortem patris sui, vivente fratre suo supradicto. Christiana filia predictorum Andreae & Christinae, obiit sine haerede in puerili Tertia filia Andreae secundi▪ aetate sua, vivente patre suo. Bastardus Andrea● 〈◊〉. Et praedictus Andreas secundus, antequam ipse habuit ullam uxorem, genuit unum filium Bastardum, vocatum Johannem qui multum fuit probus & validus, & qui fuit Armiger cum domino Johanne Ingoldsthorp seniori, & obiit cito post mortem praedicti Andreae patris sui sine haerede. Modo dicendum est de exitu Walt. de Sharnburn, tam ante matrimonium quam post matrimonium. Walt. de Sharnburn ante matrimonium contractum inter ipsum & Julianam primam uxorem suam genuit unum filium Bastardum nomine Petrum, qui obiit ultra mare post mortem patris sui, videlicet ad Natales Domini, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XVII. & nunquam postea reversus est in patriam, nec habuit uxorem, nec suscitavit prolem. Et similiter idem Walterus genuit de praedicta Juliana, tres filias Bastardas ante matrimonium praedictum, videl. Rosa quae desponsata fuit Adae Aymles de Holkam, de quibus Walterus ..... Margareta, quae nunquam habuit virum, sed unum filium Bastardum vocatum Walterum. Agnes quae similiter nunquam habuit virum, sed unum filium Bastardum vocatum Petrum, de quo Hugo. Et idem Walterus de Sharnburn de Margeria uxore sua procreavit, unum filium vocatum Andream quartum, qui natus fuit VI Kal. Nou. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. VII. videlicet per quinque dies ante obitum patris sui & anno aetatis ejus XII. desponsavit Emmam filiam Willielmi Gosselyn de Snetesham Capitalis Seneschalli domini Roberti de Monte alto, domini de Castello de Rysing & Seneschalli Cestriae anno aetatis praedictae Emmae sexto, videl. die Dominica in Octab. Epiphaniae, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XIX. & postea ipse nutritus fuit cum praedicto domino Roberto, & domina Emma uxore ejus. Et postquam ipse Andreas fuit plenae aetatis genuit de praedicta Emma uxore sua plures filios & filias, ut patet inferius, & eodem tempore ipse fuit Armiger, cum domino Thoma de Brotherton Comit. Norff. & cum pluribus aliis dominis de Norff. in guerris Scociae, Gasconiae, & Franciae, quousque idem Andreas die Mercurii pridie Non. Junii, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLVI. cepit peregrinationem suam versus terram Sanctam de Jerusalem, & in Societate praedicti Andreae fuit Mauritius de Dersyngham, & abierunt per ..... ad Insulam de Rhodes, cum fratre Roberto Saleyns probo milite hospitalario & Mariscallo hospitalis Sancti Johannis de Jerusalem in praedicta Insula de Rhodes, & cum praedictus Andreas fuit in partibus illis Rex Angliae devicit Francos apud Cressy, & cepit per obsidionem villam de Caleys. Et tam cito quam ipse Andreas venit ad Insulam de Cipro, remansit cum domino Arnaldo Vicecount de Caremayne, qui ipsum Andream & Armandum de Aspays de villa Sanctae Mariae Podiensis, fecit milites apud Sanctum sepulchrum in Ecclesia de Jerusalem, die Sabbati XVI. Kal. Martii, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLVIII. in praesentia Vicecomitis Nerbome, & aliorum proborum & nobilium militum de Francia, Catelonia, & Alemannia, & ipse Andreas & Mauritius fuerunt apud Sanctam Catherinam, & in Egypto toto tempore pestilentiae in Anglia. Et in redeundo de terra Sancta fuit apud Romam, Anno Jubileae quinquagesimo. Modo dicendum est de exitu domini Andreae de Sharnburn quarti, & dominae Emmae uxoris suae. Andreas quintus filius praedictorum Andreae & Emmae non vixit nisi per v. dies. Item alius Andreas filius secundus praedictorum Andreae & Emmae uxoris suae, qui dictus fuit quintus Andreas natus fuit die Lunae IV. Idus Augusti, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XXVII. & ipse fuit Armiger ad bellum de Cressy, & in obsidione de Caleys, cum Comit. de Warwick, tunc temporis Marescallo Angliae, & ipse fuit ultra cum praedicto Comite usque pestilenciam in Anglia, & post praedictam pestilenciam in Anglia ipse fuit cum Duce Lancastriae Seneschallo Angliae, & cum ipso Duce fuit in Britannia ad obsidionem Civitatis Redonis, ubi ipse perculsus fuit de una petra minus grossa in capite suo super bacenetum, unde ipse languebat post ea per unum annum post obsidionem peractam quousque diem suam clausit extremum, & obut die Sabbati Non. Julii, An. Dom. millesimo CCG. LVIII. anno aetatis ejus XXXI. & sepultus est in Capella juxta Andream secundum. Emma prima filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae uxoris ejus nata fuit die Lunae IU. Kal. Aug. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XXVIII. & desponsata fuit Johanni de la Rokele de Wymondham, die Lunae IX. Kal. Dec. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLIX. Qui suit cum praedicto domino Andrea patre praedictae Emmae ad obsidionem Civitatis Redonis in Britannia, ubi ipse Johannes obiit die Jovis VII. Kal. Feb. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. LVI. & sepultus est ibidem in suburgo in Ecclesia Sancti Stephani Prothomartiris ad Altare Beatae Mariae virginis juxta crucem ex parte Boreali. Et praedictus Johannes procreavit de praedicta Emma uxore sua duos filios & duas filias, videlicet Thomas natus die Sabbati in festo Sancti Barnabae, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. LI. Johannes qui non vixit nisi per dimidium annum. Agnes nata. ..... Willielmus tertius filius praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, non vixit nisi per duos annos & dimidium. Johannes quartus filius praedictorum Andreae & Emmae non vixit nisi per dimidium annum. Alicia secunda filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, nata fuit die Sabbati V. Kal. Nou. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XXXV. & obiit in pestilencia An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLIX. & sepulta est apud Snetesham, in Capella ex parte Boreali Ecclesiae. Robertus quintus filius praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, natus fuit die Veneris VI Kal. Jan. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XXXVI. & obiit in eadem pestilencia, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLIX. & sepultus est juxta praedictam Aliciam sororem suam. Item alius Willielmus filius sextus praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, natus fuit die Lunae XI. Kal. Junii, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XXXIX. Margareta tertia filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, nata fuit die Jovis VII. Id. Sept. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XL. & obiit in pestilencia praedicta, & sepulta est apud Snetesham, juxta praedictum Robertum fratrem suum. Agnes quarta filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, nata fuit die Dominica III. Non. Maii, An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLII. & obiit in pestilencia supradicta, & sepulta est juxta praedictam Margaretam sororem suam. Beata quinta filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, non vixit nisi per unum annum & quarterium. Katherine sexta filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, nata fuit die Mercurii VIII. Kal. Junii, An. Dom. CCC. XLV. Christiana septima filia praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, nata fuit die Lunae VIII. Kal. Octob. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. XLVII. Walterus septimus filius praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, natus fuit die Veneris, III. Id. Mar. An. Dom. millesimo CCC. LIV. finiente. * Haec manu nupera inserta sum. Modo dicendum est de exitu Willielmi filii praedictorum Andreae & Emmae, qui quidem Willielmus fuit filius sextus, & haeres praedicti Andreae, seniores filii omnes interiere ut supra. Willielmus habuit exitum de se legitime procreatum duas filias Claritiam & Margeriam. Claritia fuit desponsata Johanni Toly, & idem Johannes Toly, & Claritia habuerunt exitum de se legitime procreatum unam filiam nomine Margaretam, quae modo desponsata est Ricardo Elliswyke, & praedicta Margeria altera filiarum praedicti Willielmi de Sharnburn desponsata fuit Willielmo Champeneys, & habuerunt exitus; modo iidem Willielmus Champeneys, & Margeria & exitus eorum mortui sunt. Item memorandum, quod Ric. Elliswyke Armiger, desponsavit Margaretam Toly filiam & haeredem Johan. Toly Armigeri de Sharnburn, An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. IU. & anno Regni Regis Henrici quinti quartodecimo genuit filium primogenitum nomine Thomam Elliswyke, also nomine Thomam Sharnburn; praedictus Thomas Sharnburn genuit Johannem Sharnburn primogenitum ex Jomena uxore sua, etc. ut sequitur. Item Robertus filius secundus praedictorum Ricardi & Margaretae, obiit sine haerede. Item Nicholaus filius tertius praedictorum Ricardi & Margaretae fuit Rector Ecclesiae de Hedham. Item Margareta primogenita filia desponsata fiut Roberto Carwell generoso, & ex ea genuit Robertum Carwell, & idem Robertus Carwell junior desponsavit Elianoram Pynkebek, etc. Item Thomas Sharnburn primus filius praedictorum Ricardi & Margaretae desponsavit Jomonam Cherneys, servientem cum domina Margareta Regina Angliae, & ex ea genuit Johannem Sharnburnum primum filium: & praedictus Thomas Sharnburn, fuit hostiarius camerae, cum domina Margereta Regina Angliae, & praedicta Jomona fuit domicell ..... camerae cum domina Margereta Regina Angliae, & obiit IV. die Febr. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LVIII. & sepulta est in Ecclesia Apostolorum Petri & Pauli in Sharnburn, in australi parte sub fenestra in Capella ejusdem. Johannes primus filius praedictorum Thomae & Jomonae, natus fuit VIII. die Julii. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. XLIV. Edwardus secundus filius praedictorum Thomae & Jomonae, natus fuit VIII. Kal. Junii, & obiit in juvenili aetate septendecem annorum, & sepultus Londoniae in pestilencia. Thomas tertius filius praedictorum Thomae & Jomonae, natus fuit tertio Non. Augusti, & obiit in puerili aetate, & sepultus est in Ecclesia Apostolorum Petri & Pauli de Sharnburn. * Abhinc manu recentiore continuatur Code● MS. Margareta prima & ultima filia praedictorum Thomae & Jomonae, nata fuit XI. Kal. Sept. & obiit in juvenili aetate, & sepulta est in Ecclesia Sanctae Margaretae Virginis & Martyris de Lynn Episcopi, An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. XLVIII. Antonius quartus filius praedictorum Thomae & Jomonae, natus fuit pridie Kal. Feb. & obiit in magna pestilencia cum magno sudore, anno aetatis suae vicesimo sexto, An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXXV. & primo Regni Regis Henrici septimi, & sepultus est Londoniae. Johannes Sharnburn primus filius & haeres praedictorum Thomae & Jomanae desponsavit Annam unam haeredum & filiam domini Johannis Curson militis, & Johannae uxoris ejus de Billingsford Non. Feb. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXI. & anno XII. Regni Regis Edwardi quarti, & ex ea genuit duos filios & octo filias, ut patet inferius. Johanna prima filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit III. Kal. Apr. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXIII. Anno XIV. Regni Regis Edwardi quarti. Et habuit ante matrimonium Robertum Sharnburn, & postea nupta fuit Gervasio Kelfull de Sharnburn. Henricus primus filius praedictorum Johannis & Annae, natus fuit die dominica in festo Sancti Georgii Martyris, An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXIV. Margareta secunda filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit IX. Kal. Aug. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXV. Anno Edwardi IV. XVI. & obiit juvenis. Thomas secundus filius praedictorum Johannis & Annae, natus fuit Idibus Sept. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXVI. anno Regis Edwardi IU. XVII. Jomona tertia filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit XVII. Kal. Jan. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXVII. Anno Regni Edwardi IU. XVIII. & sepulta est in Sharnburn. Anna quarta filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit Kal. Mar. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXVIII. Anno Regis Edwardi IV. XIX. & fuit monacha professa in Comit. Norff. & obiit ibidem. Elizabetha quinta filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit primo die Jan. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXX. anno Regni Edwardi quarti XXI. obiit in juventute, & sepulta est in Sharnburn. Elizabetha sexta filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit XVI. Kal. Dec. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXXI. & Regni Edwardi quarti XXII. Et postea nupta fuit Edmundo Poget de Honingham in Comit. Norff. generoso. Alicia septima filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit III. Idus Nou. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXXIV. anno secundo Regis Ricardi tertii. Agnes octava filia praedictorum Johannis & Annae, nata fuit duodecimo Kal. Feb. An. Dom. millesimo CCCC. LXXXVII. Anno Regis Henrici VII. III. & vixit quatuor diebus, & sepulta est in Sharnburn. Modo dicendum est de Henrico Sharnburn, primo filio & haerede praedicti Johannis Sharnburn, & Annae uxoris suae. Qui Henricus cepit in uxorem Elizabetham filiam, domini Ricardi Lewis milite in Comit. Essex. & habuit ex ea exitum Thomam Sharnburn, de quo postea, & duos alios filios qui obierunt in infantia sua. Hic Henricus fuit vir fortis & validus multumque versatus inter Aulicos tempore Henrici octavi, qui quidem Rex ipsum Henr. Sharnburn singulari quadam gratia & favore amplectens, primo fecit eum militem, deinde le Provost Marshall, & postea Vice-Admirallum Angliae, misitque cum ad mare navi viris & armis fortiter munita, ut perpulsaret, & a finibus nostris perfugaret piratos & praedones praecipue ex Gallica gente, qui eo tempore plurimum praedabantur in oris Angliae. In quo negotio viriliter quidem ipse Henr. se gerebat quamvis sibi inutiliter successerit. Nam post multa a se praeclare ac valide gesta tandem forte incidit in Admirallum Franciae, cum quo ferocissime & crudelissime habuit pugnam, in qua plurimi ex utraque parte occisi fuerunt, quorum percipuus erat ipse dominus Henricus Sharnburn, & sic finierunt dies ejus. Praedictus autem Thomas Sharnburn filius & haeres dicti domini Henr. Sharnburn, jam tunc aetate XVIII. annorum erat cum patre suo in navi in praedicta pugna, ubi ingens & insolitus bombardarum sonitus aures suas ita obtudit, ut semper postea per totam vitam surdus remanserit. Serviebat tamen Illustrissimae Principi dominae Mariae filiae primogenitae Regis Henrici VIII. & ex ejus familia elegit sibi uxorem nomine Elizabetham Atwell unam ex ancillis dictae principis, ex qua procreavit unum filium & duas filias, qui omnes in infantia aut puerili aetate mortui sunt. Ipsa autem Elizabetha uxor dicti Thomae Sharnburn, in partu unius dictorum liberorum spiritum spiravit extremum XIII. die Feb. Anno Regis Henrici VIII. XXX. & sepultus est apud Sharnburn. Sed praedictus Thomas brevi tempore post accepit aliam conjugem nomine Blitham Brampton, filiam Johannis Brampton de Brampton in Comit. Norff. Armigeri, quae peperit sibi quinque filios & duas filias, quorum primus erat Christopherus Sharnburn qui natus fuit XII. die Oct. Anno Regni Henr. VIII. XXX V. An. Dom. 1542. de quo postea. Secundus erat Antonius Sharnburn qui obiit eodem die quo natus fuit, viz. XXIV. Feb. anno Regis Henrici VIII. XXXV. 1543. Tertius erat Dorothea Sharnburn quae nata fuit XX. die Nou. anno Henrici VIII. XXXVII. 1545. Quae Dorothea primo nupta fuit Johanni plumsted de plumsted in Comit. Norff. generoso, & post mortem dicti Thomae nupsit cuidam Roberto Nichols, & habuit exitum ex utroque marito. Quartus erat Henr. Sharnburn qui natus fuit IV. die Apr. anno Regis Edwardi VI primo An. Dom. 1547. Quintus erat Thomas Sharnburn qui natus fuit XXIII. die Sept. Edwardi VI secundo, qui obiit infantulus in Ingoldsthorp apud nutricem suam. Sextus autem fuit Anna Sharnburn quae nata erat III. die Novemb. anno Edwardi VI tertio obiit in infantia apud Dersyngham, cum nutrice sua. Septimus erat Antonius Sharnburn, qui ortns fuit XX. die Mar. anno Regni Edwardi VI quinto An. Dom. 155●. qui obiit etiam tertio die Jan. An. Dom. 16●4. anno aetatis suae LIII. & quia celibatam degebat vitam nullum ex se 〈◊〉 exitum. Praedictus autem Thomas Sharnburn pater praedictorum liberorum in senectute sua saepe, & vehementer gravabatur ex dolore lapidis in ●enibus & vesica, qui morbus ita vires suas naturales debilitavit & mortem approximavit, ut XXII. die Mar. An. Dom. 1559. diem clausit extremum. Et sepultus est in Capella Ecclesiae de Sharnburn, atque praedicta Blitha uxor ejus supervixit eum, & habuit sibi pro termino vitae suae totum manerium de Sharnburn, nupsitque cuidam Lanceloto Smalperd generoso, cum quo degebat pluribus annis & supervixit eum per decem annos, ita ut omnes dies ipsius Blithae possunt computari ad octoginta, & sex vel septem annos, obiit autem primo die Nou. An. Dom. 1602. & sepulta est in Capella Ecclesiae de Sharnburn, loco ubi Thomas Sharnburn maritus suus sepultus fuit. Modo dicendum est de Christopher Sharnburn, primo filio praedictorum Thomae & Blithae, qui postquam ad virilem aetatem pervenerat duxit in uxorem Annam Veere, ex progenie Comit. Oxon. & consanguineam Thomae Ducis Norff. ex qua procreavit Franciscum Sharnburn, de quo postea. Et praedictus Christopherus obiit sexto die Julii, An. Dom. 1576. anno aetatis suae tricesimo quarto, & sepultus in inferiori parte Capellae Ecclesiae de Sharnb●rn prope parietem. FINIS. A DIALOGUE Concerning the COIN of the KINGDOM: Particularly, What great Treasures were exhausted from England, by the usurped Supremacy of Rome. Viandante. Selvaggio. VIand. * It wants the beginning. ..... God amend them: But to return to the point that led us into this digression, The excessive price of Meat; I pray let us now leave foreign Countries, to look a little into our own; and tell me what you think to be the cause, that the prices of things do so far exceed the proportion of ancient times. For I have seen in an old Evidence, that a good Cow was in those days sold for ten or twelve shillings; and at this day, I dare say such an one will cost thirty or forty shillings, and so likewise of other things. Selu. How sore soever Victuallers, Innkeepers, Taverns, and such like, gripe their Guests and Travellers; yet it is worth the examining whether the prices of things be in any notable excess greater than in ancient times they have been. For if we consider the value of the shilling then, with the value of the shilling now; we shall find that their shilling was in value three of ours. For then, out of an ounce of Silver they coined but five groats, and after (because money was scarce in the Land) the King caused ten groats to be made of an ounce. So that by this means there grew to be twice as much money in the Land as was afore, and yet never the more of Silver. After, in the 36. of Henr. VIII. it was enhanced to four shillings the ounce; and now lastly unto five. So that now our five shillings neither weigheth nor is more worth in Silver, than their sieve groats of ancient time. And then it followeth by necessary consequence, that the Cow that you speak of to be sold for ten shillings, may now be well worth thirty shillings, and yet no difference at all in their prices. For admit, that the custom used in the time of the Conqueror, and since also, (as appeareth by Doomsday-book, etc.) had continued until this day; to receive and pay all sums of money according unto the weight and touch, without respect of the Stamp or Coin; then was the price of your ten shilling Cow six ounces of Silver, and ours of thirty shillings is so likewise, and not one penny more; & sic de caeteris. But admit again, that the Queen's Majesty should reduce her Coin to the former Rate of sieve groats to the ounce, do you think that things would then be sold for so many shillings or pounds, as they now be? I warrant you, No. Then is it the unstable value of our former Coins, that so much deceiveth a great number. For look into such things as have always retained an uniform content, and you shall find little difference between our and the former times, in giving one of those things for another. For at this day, you may buy a Cow for as few Sheep as you could then, and a Horse for as few Cows. The Land that was then let (with us in Norfolk for 8d. or 10d. the acre, and now for eight groats or three shillings, was in those days also let for a coumbe of Barley, and yet will not now be hired at so great a Rate. Viand. You have answered me beyond my expectation; but yet not fully satisfied me. For tho' I allow you these proportions, yet there remaineth a great diversity. For I have read, that in old time, a quarter of Wheat was sold at London for 2s. a fat Ox for a noble, a fat Sheep for 6d. or 8d. half a dozen of Pigeons for a penny, a fat Goose for 2d. a Pig for a penny, and other things after that Rate. And yet I grant that a Man in letting or selling his Land for Corn, cattle, and such like, or ware for ware, might in those days have as much as he can get now. Selu. The time you speak of was about the 10th. of Edw. III. and the like hath been at other times also. And when the cause hereof is well considered, you shall find another right good reason, why things should be sold for more money now, than they were then, and yet no whit at all dearer; and that is, the plenty and abundance of plate and money, which at this day is to be found in England, more than ever was in time past. For it is not our Commodities that be grown dearer, but Gold and Silver are become more common and of less estimation than they were wont. Insomuch, that whereas Plate was dainty in Great-man's Houses, it ruffleth now even at the meanest Tables; and money is so little respected, as we will give great store thereof 1 Kings ch. 10. ver. 21. for a small Commodity. Like as in the days of Solomon, Silver was so plentiful, as it was nothing esteemed: no, it was holden so base a metal, as Solomon would not make one vessel thereof, no, not for his own service, much less for the Temple of God. Yet afterward it became so scarce, as when 2 Chron. ch. 24. Joash undertook to repair the Temple, he was driven to tax the people for it, that thereby he might have wherewith to pay the workmen, and whereon to make the holy Vessels. So, King Edw. III. having with effusion of much Treasure ended his Scottish Wars, and determined to begin afresh with France, practised such means to recover money to supply these charges, as he got so much into his hands, that Writers report, it was very scant and hard to be come by, through the whole Realm. And hereupon proceeded the cheapness that you speak of; Men were constrained to give a great deal of ware for a little money, because they could have no other chaffer for their Commodities. But from these particular Contingents, you must not raise general Consequents: for in that sort, I can show unto you, that things were much dearer before the time you speak of, than they are now. As in 22. Edw. I. a quarter of Wheat was sold for 30s. So in the time of Richard I. all things were so exceeding dear for three or four years together, that a quarter of Wheat was then sold for 18 ●. 8 ●. a strange price, if you consider the allay of money than currant; and this was almost 400. years ago. Also in the year 1289. (Edw. I. 17.) Wheat was ordinarily sold for 2s. the bushel, and continued at that price almost forty years together; rising oftentimes to 10s. the bushel, and sometimes to a mark and above, as in the year 1317. and in these days, other things bare price accordingly. I could put you many Examples more, if these sufficed not: but sure I am of mind, that all occurrents rightly weighed, things be little or nothing dearer than in ancient time. Viand. You say sore unto me, if you make it apparent that money were so plentiful as you affirm it. For my own part, I am sure, I have little enough. Selu. And I too: but that is not the matter: For what store of sap soever the tree hath, yet many sprigs and leaves do wither away for want thereof. The great ones have it, I warrant you; and that ultra modum; but to our matter. Two things are the causes thereof: It is brought in more plentifully than in ancient times, and carried out more sparingly. Brought in more plentifully, in respect of greater traffic that we have had within these latter years, even to all places in the World; by which we have uttered our own Commodities at the dearest; and fetched the foreign from the original places, which with far greater charge we were wont to buy at second hand. Viand. Yea, marry, Sir: the less we have of some of that trafficking, the better (I think) for England. For by this means, they carry from us our good Corn, Wool, Cloth, Copper, Led, Tinn, and such like rich Commodities, and the sustenance of our Country; and return us for them excess of Lawn, Cambric, Plums, Spice, Suckets, and other lascivious trumpery, whereby effeminate delicacy is crept in amongst us, and our warlike reputation put in peril to be lost. This kind of traffic may well be termed Glauci & Diomedis permutatio. Doth the wealth and money you speak of, come into England by this means? Selu. Nothing less. There be other good merchandise enough; as Pitch, Tar, Iron, Copper, Deal, Madder, Woad, Cutchaneale, and such like; and yet those you speak of, are in some measure necessary. But by our traffic into foreign Countries, tho' we many times bring home light and frivolous toys, yet they are often accompanied with Gold and Silver, both in Coin and Bullion. Besides, you know that the Treasure (according to my capacity) is infinite, which in these later years hath been unshipped in England. Viand. True; but goeth it not out as merrily (think you) as it cometh in? or not so fast, as it did in times past? Selu. That is the other point to be considered of; and, I know by certain speeches uttered in the last Parliament, that her majesty's occasions to disperse it, are exceeding great and urgent: yet a principal part thereof runneth (as in a circle) up and down the Land. And tho' she sendeth much beyond the Seas, for entertainment of her Bands and Garrisons, and executing of her other Royal purposes; yet doth she therein but as all her Renowned Progenitors have done before her: For neither England, nor any other Realm in Europe, have ever wanted this kind of issue. But the reasons that make me think that our wealth should continue with us better now than in times past it hath done; are, for that the Roman-coffers are not now glutted (as they have been) with English-treasure continually flowing into them. For it is a world to consider the huge stocks of money, that those cozening Prelates have heretofore extorted out of her Majesty's Kingdoms, by their Antichristian and usurped Supremacy. As, by Pope Innocent constraining King John to redeem his Crown at his hands, and to take it for ever in farm, for the yearly rent of 1000 marks, to be paid to him and his Successors: By causing Henry III. to maintain his wars against Frederick the Emperor and Conrade King of Sicil: By drawing from our Kings many contributions and benevolences: By laying upon their Subjects, as well temporal as spiritual, tenths and taxes, in most ravenous manner, and that very often. (So that in the time of Henry III. the Realm was by such an extreme tax mightily impoverished, as our Chronicles witness; as also at many other times since and before. For when the Pope was disposed to use money, he would tax our people as if they had been his natural Subjects; by many Congratulations of the Clergy, as 11000. marks at one pull to Pope Innocent IV. by private Remembrances from single Bishops, as 9500. marks from the Archbishop of York to Pope Clement V. in An. 34. or 35. Edw. I. and from divers of them jointly 6000. marks to the foresaid Innocent.) By their rich Revenue of the First-fruits and Tenths, as well of the Archbishoprics, as of all other Spiritual Livings; now reannext unto the Crown by the Parliament, in the first of her Majesty: By Installing, Consecrating, and Confirming Bishops: By dealing Benefices: By appellations to the Church of Rome: By giving definitive Sentences: By distributing heavenly Grace: By granting Pardons and Faculties: By dispensations of Marriages, Oaths, and such like: By selling their blessed trumpery, and many such other things that I cannot reckon, whereof that merchandizing Prelate knoweth full well how to make a Commodity: according to the saying of Mantuan; — Venalia nobis Templa, Sacerdotes, Altaria sacra, Coronae, Ignis, thura, preces, coelum est Venale, Deusque. All this considered, and that the sums of money by them received before the time of Henry VIII, were (according to the value of our Coin at this day) three times as much, as before is showed; you must needs confess that the fat of the Land larded the Roman dishes, whilst ourselves teered upon the lean-bones. Besides, it must not be forgotten, that one tenth granted to the Pope, impoverished the Realm more than ten unto the King. For what the King had, was at length returned again among the Subjects, little thereof going out of the Land: (much like the life-blood, which tho' it shifteth in divers parts, yet still continueth itself within the body.) But whatsoever came into St. Peter's pouch, was locked up with the infernal key; Et, ab infernis nulla est redemptio. England might lick her lips after that; it came no more among her people. Thus, we were made the Bees of Holy-Church; suffered to work and store our hives as well as we could; but when they waxed any thing weighty, his Legates were sent to drive them and fetch away the honey. Yea, if his Holiness were sharp set indeed, he would not stick to use a trick of Husbandry, rather burn the Bees than want the honey. I may tell you too, his Legates and Nuncio's were ever trim fellows at licking of the hive; as in our Chronicles you may read abundantly. Viand. You have made the matter so plain, that I must needs grant that our treasure goeth not out of the Land in any comparable measure, as it did in times past. For as you say, tho' these actions of the Low-Countries, France, Portugal, and other places, hath somewhat sucked us; yet I consider that we have ever had such a vent, even in the several days of our Kings, as in the time of Queen Mary, King Edw. VI King Henry VIII. etc. Selu. Their occasions indeed are best known unto us, because many men living were witnesses thereof. But I will recite unto you cursorily somewhat of the rest, that you may the better be satisfied that it is no novelty in England. And for to begin with Henry II. what store of treasure (think you) was by him and his wasteful sons (whereof two, namely Henry and John were Kings as well as himself) daily carried into France, Flanders, Saxony, Sicil, Castille, the Holy-land, and other places; sometime about their wars and turbulent affairs, other some time for Royal expense about meeting, feasting, and entertaining the French King, the Pope, foreign Princes, and such other occasions, the particular whereof were too long to recite. But we may well think, that England must needs sweat for it in those days, to feed the riotous hands of three several Kings, spending so much of their time on the other side the Seas, as they did. The like was done by Richard I. about his ransom Chron. fol. 126. and business with the Emperor and Leopold Duke of Austria, about his wars in France and the Holy-land, where it is said, that by estimation he spent more in one month, than any of his predecessors ever did in a whole year. By Henry III. about the affected Kingdom of Sicil, and his wars in Gascoigne, and other parts of France, and in bounty to strangers. He at one 22●. 620. time sent into France, at the direction of the Poictovins, 30. barrels of Starling Coin, for payment of foreign Soldiers; and at another time, these his wasteful expenses being cast up, the sum amounted to 950000. marks, which after the rate of our allay, increaseth to— By Edw. I. about his Actions of Given, Gascoigne, France, Flanders, and the Conquest of Scotland, and the striking of a League with Adolph the Emperor, Guy Earl of Flanders, John Duke of Brabant, Henry Earl of Bar, Albert Duke of Austria, and others, against the French King, and Earl Jo. of Henault his partaker. By Edw. III. about his Victories and designs in France and elsewhere; which exhausted so much treasure, as little or none almost remained in the Land; as before is showed. By Henry IV. about the stirs of Britain, and in supportation of the confederate faction of Orleans. By Henry V. about his Royal Conquest of France. By Edw. IU. in aiding the Duke of Burgundy, and in revenging himself upon the King of France. By Henry VII. about his wars in France; in annoying the Flemings; in assisting the Duke of Savoy, and Maximilian King of the Romans. I need not speak of Henry VIII. whose foreign Expenses as they were exceeding great, so they are sufficiently known to most men. Neither have I more than lightly run over the rest; who, besides these that I have spoken of, had many other foreign charges of great burden and much importance, and yet not so much as once touched by me; as Marriage of their Children with foreign Princes, Treaties of Peace between their Neighbours, Congratulations, Embassages, and such like. Viand. But what moves you to let slip King John, Edward II. Richard II. Henry VI and Richard III. Selu. Not for that they were free from foreign Expenses, which is not possible; for it oppressed them all: but for that most of them omitted such necessary charge, as in policy they ought to have undergone, both for strengthening themselves with Friends, and weakening their suspected Enemies; such as, when occasion served, were like to do them damage. For if Edw. III. had not by this means fortified himself with the alliance and friendship of the noble Knight Sir John of Henault, the Dukes of Brabant and Gelderland, the Archbishop of Colein, the Marquis Gul●ck, Sir Arnold de Baquetien, the Lord Walkenbargh and others; and also greatly impai●'d the power of the French King, by winning the Flemings from the obedience of the Earl of Flanders (his assured friend), and by procuring the stay of much of the aid by him expected out of the Empire, Scotland, and other places; he had not only failed in his French attempts, but also put his Kingdom of England in hazard by the Scots, who were sure of all the help and backing, that France could any way afford them. So, had it not been for the aid and friendship of the French King, the Earls of Bullogne, St. Paul, the Gascoines, and other foreigners; Henry III had been bereaved of his Kingdom by his own Subjects; which, notwithstanding he held with great difficulty. So the rest likewise. But on the contrary part, the others whom you named, neglecting this right precious (tho' costly) ground work; not only wanted it when need required; but with the ruin of their People, State, and Kingdom, lost their Crown and dearest lives, by the infernal hands of cursed Murderers; their rebellious Subjects getting once the better hand. Viand. But Edw. II. used means also to have procured the amity and assistance of divers foreigners, as the Duke of Britain, the Lord Biskey, the Lady Biskey (Governess of the King of Castille and Leon) James King of Arragon, and others. And Rich. II. sought the like of the hands of the French King; and so the rest likewise of others. Selu. True: not examining the dependencies of time present, they imagined in their prosperity that things to come would ever have good success; and therefore deferred still the doing of it, till extreme necessity compelled them to it: and then their Estates being utterly desperate and ruinated, no man willingly would lend them aid or ear. Knowing, that when the fury of the disease hath once possessed the vital places, it is then too late to apply Physic. This reason made the Princes you speak of, to refuse King Edward II. And as for Richard II. when the French King saw how he was entangled and overladen with dangerous Rebellions and Divisions of his Nobles and Commons at home; war in Scotland, Flanders, Spain, Portugal, Ireland; sending forces against the Infidels; relieving the expelled King of Armenia; and many other such turbulent affairs: he than thought (and truly) that there was more to be gotten by being his Enemy than his Friend; and taking advantage of that opportunity, defied him also, and warred upon him. So that King Richard, wholly void of aid and hope, fell into the hands of his proud Barons, and lost both Crown and Life. In like miserable sort stood the case with Henry VI For being once descended to the lowest exigent, who almost durst relieve him or any of the rest; for fear (as our Proverb saith) of pulling an old house upon his own head! Whereas, if in their flourishing estate, they had employed their treasure to encounter future perils being yet afar off, they had (no doubt) securely held their Crowns, and perhaps without much business illuded all the practices of their Enemies drawing nearer. Had Richard II. at the time when being in France, he bestowed the value of 10000l. in gifts upon the fickle French King, stayed there and employed the other 300000. and odd marks (by him also wasted at that bravery) in gaining the amity of his neighbour Princes, to serve his turn when need should be; it is not unlikely but afterwards it might have saved all the rest. For it is a good rule that is taught us in the art of Fencing, to break the blow or thrust that might endanger us, as far from our Bodies as we can. For, as I said before, when things be drawn to the last period, the time of help is past, according to the saying of Hecuba to her betrayed husband, being about to arm himself. — Quae mens tam dira, miserrime conjux, Impulit his cingi telis? aut quo ruis? (inquit) Non tali auxilio, nec defensoribus istis Tempus eget; non si ipse meus nunc afforet Hector. Most Royal therefore are the Providence and Expenses of her Excellent Majesty; who (as it were with Lynceus eyes) looking into the lowest secrets of the practices of her Enemies, hath not only for these 36. years utterly cancelled and made them frustrate; but foreseeing also what mighty consequences may depend on mean beginnings, omitteth no diligence to defeat them whilst they are yet in the shell; or so to environ the mark whereat they are levelled, as being hatched, they shall be able to perform nothing. Knowing it to be far greater wisdom to preserve the body, (whilst it is sound) from all infirmities, than by admitting a dangerous disease, to gain the credit of an excellent cure. And tho' money be the Blood wherein the Life of all Commonwealths, as in a nest, is cherished; yet nature teacheth that to preserve health and cure an impostumate disease, we ought to let blood out, and that sometimes in great abundance. And, as Themistocles said, Pecunia nervus belli, (money is also the sinews of war;) and look how necessary Peace is in a Commonwealth, so necessary is War to beget Peace; for Peace is Belli filia, (the daughter of war.) But to return to our matter: lest we fare like the unskilful hounds, that undertake a fresh hare, when they have hunted the first till she be almost spent. It appeareth by that that hath been said, that a main Port by which our treasure hath been vented from us heretofore, is now shut (God be thanked) and that instead thereof no new is opened. So that thereby our store must needs remain better by us than it hath, and we by consequence must be the richer. It is also to be added, that whereas in former times, much of the treasure that came into the land was buried up in superstitious employments, as about Images, Shrines, Tabernacles, Copes, Vestments, Altar-cloaths, Crucifixes, Candlesticks, etc. by means whereof, the Commonwealth became no whit richer, than if that part so employed, had never come within the Land: Now we do not only retain that Idolatrous charge still in our purses, (which makes us much the wealthier) but the rest also (which for many hundred years together was so employed) is now to our greater enrichment returned again amongst us, by dissolution of these Popish Ceremonies. Viand. You may also reckon the money given to maintenance of Priests, Monkery, Lights, Obits, Anniverssaries, and all the plate and treasure of the Clergy at that time, to be of the same sort. Selu. Chron. fol. 292. b. 50. That did Edward the first well consider: and therefore to the end that he might dig it out of the grave, and bring it abroad again among the people that had need thereof; he suffered the matter to be so handled by one of his Treasurers, that certain Captains appointed to work the feat, placing their Soldiers in every quarter through the Realm, made search at one time (in July at three of the clock in the afternoon) for all such money, were it hid or laid up in hallowed places; and taking the same away, brought it unto the King; who dissembling the matter (as he that stood in need) excused the act done by his Treasurer, and thought it no offence, but rather a good work. Besides all this, there is yet another means whereby the Treasure of our Land must needs be much increased: and that is by divers good Laws and Statutes, made both for causing it to be brought into the Realm, and also for containing it within the lists of the same, when it is come. And that is by the Stat. 14. Edw. III. whereby it was enacted, that every man (denizen or stranger) that should transport any wool out of the Land, should find sufficient sureties to bring again unto the King's Exchange, for every sack of wool transported, plates of Silver to the value of two marks. And by the Statute of 3. Henry V. (confirmed and quickened by 32. Hen. VI) which provided, that every Merchant-stranger, buying wool in England, not coming to the Staple to be sold, shall bring to the Master of the Mint of the Tower of London, of every sack, one ounce of Bullion of Gold: and in the same manner, of three pieces of Tin, one ounce of Bullion of Gold, or the value in Bullion of Silver, upon pain of forfeiture of the same Wools and Tin, or the value thereof, to the King. It is provided also for containing of money within the Land, that all Merchant-strangers shall employ all the money received by them within this Realm, upon the Merchandise and Commodities of this Realm, (deducting their reasonable expenses;) and that they shall give sufficient surety for doing hereof, and the trespasser to forfeit and be punished grievously, as in the Statutes is contained; 3. Hen. VII. affirming and enlarging, 14. Edw. IU. and many other of like effect. And by 4. Hen. VII. that no man dwelling in England, shall pay or deliver wittingly to any Merchant or other born out of the King's obedience, for any Merchandise or Wares, or in any other wise, any Gold coined, Plate, Vessels, Bullion, Jewels of Gold or Silver, upon pain of forfeiture thereof. And by 14. Edw. IV. (affirmed by 4. Hen. VII. and for a time continued by 1. and 3. Henry VIII. with a mitigation of the bloody penalty) all men, except such as had the King's Licence, or were dispensed with by those Statutes, were utterly inhibited from carrying out of the Realm any manner of Coin, plate, vessel, massy Bullion, jewels of Gold or Silver. Which Law, and many other of the like effect, tho' they continue not now in force, yet the fruit thereof remaineth to us still, as Children enriched by their Father's sparings. Besides, it is not altogether to be passed in silence, that our treasure is somewhat increased by the Gold and Silver tried out of our own Mines here in England. Which, tho' it be little or nothing, in respect that in this latter age we have wimbled even into the bowels of Plutus' Treasury (the Western Indies,) yet is it so much, as our Historiographers, both new and ancient, have thought it worth the noting; and all our Kings from time to time have made especial account of; as well appeareth by a multitude of Leases thereof granted by them to many noble Personages, extant in the Checquer Records; and also by the process and argument of the Earl of Northumberland's Case concerning a Copper-mine, 10. Eliz. which in Plowden's Commentaries is at large reported. But be it little or great, Many littles (as our Adage saith) make a great, and continual accession amasseth at length to a mighty thing; as is well seen in the Hill Testacchio in Rome, which standing in a plain, and being about half a mile in compass, and exceeding in height any Tower in the Town-wall, is said to have been made of the shards of the pots wherein the tribute-money was brought to Rome; or as pleaseth rather the more Learned sort, of broken pots thrown out of the VII. College of Potters, built by Numa Pompilius. But be it the one or other, the semblance serves my turn, and there's an end. THE PLACES or DWELLINGS OF THE ARCH-BISHOPS and BISHOPS of this Realm, Now or of former times; in which Houses their several Owners have Ordinary Jurisdiction, and be as parcel of their Diocese, as is recited in the Stat. of 33. Hen. VIII. ca 31. altho' they be situate within the precinct of another Bishop's Diocese. Canterbury 1. THe Lords Archbishops of CANTERBURY of long time enjoyed and do enjoy Lambeth-house; as appeareth in Historia Cantuariensium Archiepiscoporum, set forth (as is thought) by Dr. Ackworth in the Lord Archbishop Parker's time. The which house was never severed from the Lord Archbishop's See of Canterbury, since the annexion thereof to that See. Rochester. 2. The house at Lambeth-marsh, commonly called Carlisle-house, was the Bishop of ROCHESTER'S Palace until about 26. Hen. VIII. as appeareth in the foresaid Historia Cantuariensis, and also in the Act of Parliament of 22. Hen. VIII. ca 9 made against poisoning; whereby it doth appear that the house of John Bishop of Rochester was at Lambeth-marsh. But afterwards, about An. 27. Hen. VIII. or after, the same (being some ways the Kings) was conveyed to Robert Aldridge Bishop of CARLISLE and his Successors, in Carlisle. exchange for his houses near Ivie-bridge, (now the Earl of Worcester and Salisbury's) and other houses there toward the Street, and of a yearly Rent of 16l. or thereabouts, out of those houses given to the Bishop of Carlisle and his Successors, for those houses formerly called Carlile-place. But the said Bishop Aldridge leased the house of Lambeth-marsh for some small and not valuable Rent, for divers years yet enduring. Rochester. 3. The Bishop of ROCHESTER had given for his Palace to dwell in, certain houses lately called Rochester-house near adjoining to Winchester-place, and sometime (as it is reported) parcel of the possessions of the Priory of St. Swithins in Winchester; but that place is lately divided into several little dwellings. Winchester. 4 WINCHESTER- Place, with the liberty of the Prison of the Clynke and Bank, belonged and doth belong to the Bishop of Winchester; and the house was in Edw. the Sixth's time, conveyed to the Marquis of Northampton, who builded the gallery there: but in Queen Mary's time, the same was restored to that See, where it so continueth. York. 5. The Lord Archbishop of YORK'S house was the Whitehall, much enlarged and reedifyed by the Cardinal Wolsey then Archbishop of York; as by the Arms remaining in wood, stone, and glass, in sundry places of that house, may appear. And after the said Cardinal's conviction of Praemunire, and Death, the same was made parcel of the King's Palace at Westminster, by purchase from the Archbishop of York, as appear by the Stat. of 28. Hen. VIII. ca 12. But afterwards, until anno 2. or 3. of Queen Mary, the Archbishop of York had no other dwelling-place near London, in right of his See or by reason of his Archbishopric, but the house at Battersey; and then Queen Mary gave to Archbishop Heath and his Successors, the late Duke of Suffolk's house, called Suffolk-place in Southwark, which the Archbishop of York (by confirmation of the Dean and Chapter there) shortly after sold away to others, and purchased to his See York-place, where the Lord Chancellor remaineth, together with the houses adjoining to the Street. Which house was sometime the Bishop of Norwich's Place; and the same, Norwich among all or the greatest part of the possessions of the See of Norwich, about an. 27. Hen. VIII. were conveyed to the King by a private Act of Parliament, in recompense of the union of the Monastery of St. Bennets, and the possessions thereof to that Bishopric; being of far better value than the ancient Lands of the Bishopric of Norwich assured to the King, as is recited in the Statute of 32. Hen. VIII. ca 47. whereby the Bishop of Norwich is made Collector of the Tenths of his Diocese, as other Bishops were; being formerly freed thereof by the said private Statute of 27. Hen. VIII. Which said now York-place, by Hen. VIII. was conveyed in fee to Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk; and after the death of the said Duke's sons, the coheirs of the Duke's sons sold the same to the said Archbishop Heath and his Successors. Norwich. 6. But the Bishop of NORWICH was limited by the said private Act of 27. Henry VIII. to enjoy perpetually in succession, a Prebend in the Free-Chappel of St. Stephens at Westminster, after dissolved by the Statute of Dissolution of Colleges and Free-Chappels 1. Ed. VI and the house thereto belonging in Chanon-row, whereof then was incumbent one Knight; but the house is said to be Leased for some small Rent by the Bishop of Norwich to Sir John Thinn Knight in Edw. the Sixth's time, for many years enduring. And that the house now called York-place, was belonging to the Bishop of Norwich, is proved by a Case 21. Edw. IV. fol. 73. in a Presentment against the Bishop of Norwich in the King's Bench, for annoyance of a way inter hospitium Episcopi Norwicensis & Dunelmensis, in parochia Sancti Martini in Campis. Durham. 7. DURHAM-HOUSE (as appeareth in that Case) was the Bishop of Durham's house; and Bishop Tonstal about the 26 th'. of Hen. VIII. conveyed the same to the King in Fee: and King Henry VIII. in recompense thereof, granted to the See of Durham Coldharborrowe, and certain other houses in London. And after, Edw. VI about an. 2. granted Durham-house to the Lady Elizabeth his Sister for life, or until she be otherwise advanced. After, the Bishopric of Durham, by a private Statute not printed, of 7. Edw. VI was dissolved, and all the possessions thereof given to King Edw. VI who shortly after conveyed in Fee the said Bishop's late house at Coldharborrowe, and other houses in London, to Francis Earl of Shrewsbury and his heirs. And after, the 2d. Mariae ca 3. The Stat. of 7. Edw. VI for dissolving that Bishopric is repealed; but the Mansion-house of Coldharborrowe and other Tenements in London, so granted to the said Earl, be confirmed. And the Bishop, by that Act, prayeth a recompense from the Queen at his charge. Whereupon, Queen Mary, about anno V. or VI of her reign, granteth to the said Bishop of Durham, her reversion of Durham-place in succession; which coming into possession by the death of Queen Elizabeth, the late Bishop of Durham (now Lord Archbishop of York) entered into and enjoyed the same in the right of his See, by opinion of the chief Justices of the Land, referred by the King, being opposed by Sir Walter Raleigh; as likewise doth the now Bishop of Durham. Lichfeild. 8. The Bishop of LICHFEILD and COVENTRY (of old called the Bishop of Chester, before the new erection of the new Bishopric of Chester) had his Place where Somerset-house is builded. Worcester. Landaff. 9 10. As likewise the Bishops of WORCESTER and LANDAFF, had there sometime a house; as Stow in his Book of Survey of London saith. But the said three Bishops Places, together with a Parish Church called Straunde-Church, and the greatest Inn of Chancery called Straunde-Inn, belonging to the Middle Temple, were defaced without recompense to any of the said three last mentioned Bishops, Parish Church, or Inn of Chancery: Other than to the Bishop of WORCESTER; who had in respect of his former house, a house in the White Friars, which he enjoyeth. Bath and Wells. 11. Arondell-house (now the Lord Admiral's) was the Bishop of BATH and WELLS'; and was assured, in Edw. VI time, to Admiral Seymer; and is now quite severed from that Bishopric without recompense. Exeter. 12. Likewise, the Bishop of EXETER'S Place, after called Paget, Leicester and Essex-house, of the several Owners of the same. And it is thought the Bishop of Exeter hath likewise no recompense for the same, of any other house in or near London. Sarum. 13. The Bishop of SARUM'S Place, (now called Dorset-house, before called Sackvile-house, and of former time Salisbury Court, being in long Lease made by Bishop Capon, who was Bishop there in Hen. VIII. Edw. VI and Queen Mary's time) was exchanged temp. Reginae Elizabethae, by the great Learned Reverend Father Bishop Jewel, for recompense of good value in Lands in his Diocese, or elsewhere in the West Country. St. david's. 14. The Bishop of St. DAVID'S Place, was near adjoining to Bridewell, upon the ditch that runneth to Fleet-bridge into the Thames; and was granted in Fee-farm for a Mark Rend (temp. Edw. VI) to Dr. Hewick the Physician; under which purchase the same is now enjoyed. Hereford. 15. The Bishop of HEREFORD'S Place (as Stow in his Survey of London, pag. 357. saith) is in the Parish of St. Marry de Monte alto or Mount-halt in London; of which Bishops Patronage the said Church also is; which Place is in the tenure of the Bishop of Hereford or his Tenants. London Ely 16. 17. The Bishop of LONDON'S Place at Paul's, was never severed from the Bishop's possession. And likewise ELY Place, from the Bishop of that See; other than such part thereof, as the late Lord Chancellor Hatton had by Lease for many years, from the late Bishop Cox. Bangor. 18. The Bishop of BANGOR'S house is, or lately was, Mr. Aleworth's house in Shoe-lane, by a Lease from the Bishop of that See, temp. Edw. VI yielding some Rose, or other small or not valuable Rent. Lincoln. 19 The Bishop of LINCOLN'S Place, was Southampton-house in Holborn, conveyed temp. Edw. VI to the Lord Writoheseley (than Lord Chancellor) in fee, for which the Bishop hath no other house in or near London, as is thought. Chichester. 20. The Bishop of CHICHESTERS' Place (or Palace, as Matthew Paris in his Chronicle calleth it, reciting the story of the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury visiting St. bartholomew's) did at that time lie in that house which was in Chancery-lane; where Sir Richard Read sometime a Master of the Chancery, and Mr. Atkinson the Counsellor at Law and others, dwelled and dwell in; and is said to be in Lease from the Bishop's Predecessors for divers years. What the Rents reserved yearly be, the Lease will show the same. S Asaph 21. The Bishop of St. ASAPH never had Place at or near London, that I can learn of; neither in the valuation of the See (where all his Possession; and Jurisdictions be valued in the First-fruit-office) is there mention of any such Place; neither doth the now Bishop of that See know the same. Isle of Man 22. The Bishop of the ISLE OF MAN (called Sodorensis Episcopus) altho' the same be an ancient Bishopric, yet was he never Lord of the Parliament of England; having no Chapter or other Clergy, but only an Archdeacon and all the Incumbents of the several Parishes of that Isle: And before the said Statute of 33. Hen. VIII. was neither a Suffragan of the Province of Were wont in former times to ride on Mares or Mules. 119. Prohibited to take cognizance of Wills. 129. Blackney Harbour. 151. Blicking. 151. The birth place of Q. Anna Bullen. ibid. Bocland, what. 12. Not subject to Homage. 35. Bondmen, anciently not valued or rated. 15. Reputed only as part of their Master's substance. 11▪ 15. Boors, who. 14. Bouthorpe. 157. Bramsil. 108, 109. Brancaster. 147, 148. Breakspear (Nich.) converted Norway. 139. Made Cardinal and Pope. ibid. Breclys. 161. Brennus' a Britain invades Greece. 3. His attendants. ibid. Brictrick a Saxon Thane. 22. Britain's, none of 'em remaining after Cadwallador's departure. 100 Their Laws altered by the Romans. 101. Bronholm. 152. Brotherton (Tho.) Earl of Norfolk and Earl Marshal of England. 167. When he died. 168. Buckenham. 158. Burg-Castle. 155. Burghesses, of old, not called to consult of State-matters. 64, 65. Burghbote and Brugbote. 17, 22, 40. Burnham in Norfolk. 149. Burnham-East in Com. Bucks. 23. By, what it signifies. 3. 154. By-laws. 3, 154. C Cadwallader Prince of the Britain's, fled into Armorica. 100 Calthorp. 151. King Canutus, how he published his Laws. 61. His Constitution touching Festivals. 79. Capet (Hugh) usurped the Kingdom of France. 5 He grants his Nobility a perpetual enjoyment of their Feuds and Honours. ibid. & 14. Capitales plagii. 52. Capitanei Regis & regni. 58. Caput feodi, aut Capitaneus feodi. 11. Carbrook. 161. Carolus Calvus Emperor and King of France, his Synodical Edict. 54, 55. Carolus Magnus or Charlemaigne, divided his Territories between his three Sons. 128. Castleacre. 141. Castle-rising in Norfolk, the Parson has the Probate of Wills in that Town. 130. Caston. 151. Castor. 155, 156. Ceorls, who. 12. Of two sorts. 14. The chiefest part of their profits redounded to their Lords. ibid. Their service no bondage. ibid. Their valuation and privileges. ibid. Not capable of a Knights Fee. ibid. Champain in France. 128. Chancery-Court. 94. Charta de Foresta. 109, 114. Charter, the first by whom made and where kept. 8. Saxon Charters usually writ in that Language. ibid. Charters of Thanelands granted by several Kings. 19, 20. Chichley (Henr.) Archbishop of Canterbury canonised St. George's day. 93. The occasion of that Constitution ibid. Chindavintus King of the western Goths, his Law concerning Wills. 130. Cingulum, quo sensu accipiendum. 185. Cinque-Ports, privileges granted to them by King Edward the Confessor, etc. 26. Clacklose-Hundred. 139. Clergymen forbidden to use hunting, 109, 112, 113. & seq. When they took upon them to prove Wills. 129. Prohibited by Justinian to meddle with those matters. ibid. Cley▪ harbour. 151. De Clifford (Rob.) Marshal of England. 167. K. Canute's Charter of donation to the Thane Orc. 20. Coin of England, in Q. Elisabeth's time. 203, etc. Colloquia. 65. Comites, who, and why so called. 3. Commendati. 35. Congham. 145. Conradus Salicus made a Constitution touching Feuds. 4, 5. Consecration, a strange one of Eadmer a Monk of Canterbury. 119. Consilium regni. 60. Controversies, among the ancient Britain's, by whom judged. 74. Conveyance of lands, how made by the Saxons. 8. Cosshering, what. 60. Cossey. 157. Counties in England. 5. County-Courts how often kept. 54. Were proclaimed a seven-night beforehand. ib. Earl's County and Bishop's Diocese had but one limit. 130, 131. Ecclesiastical and Secular causes there decided. 131. Courtbaron. 4. It's Original. 51. Court-Leet. 51. Sometimes granted to the Lords of Manors. ibid. Court-Christian or Ecclesiastical, when it sprung up. 131, 132. High Courts of Justice, why they sit not in the Afternoons. 89, 90. Why they sit not all some days. 90, 91. Why they sit on the Rogation days. ibid. Why on some Festivals and not on others. 91 The Admiralty-Court, why always open. 94. Chancery-Court said to be always open. ib. Cowshil. 153. Creak. 149. Cromer. 152. Crostwick. 153. Crowner's Office, not before the Conquest. 27. D Dane-blood. 149. Dane-law. 45. Danes, not capable of devising lands by will. 22 David I King of Scotland and Earl of Huntingdon. 11, 131. Dean, his Office and Functions. 50. The privileges of a Bishop's Dean. ibid. Deerham (West) 140. Defensor Plebis. 129. Degradatio Militis. 185. Deira, a Province. 13. Demains or Demesne, what. 12. Ancient Demesnes had not any lands by Knight-service. 44, 57 D'Evreux (Robert) Earl of Essex, Viscount Bourchier, etc. 171. Sent into Spain with an army. ibid. Stormed Cadiz. ibid. Created Marshal of England. ibid. Made Lord Deputy of Ireland. ibid. When beheaded. ibid. Dies juridici. 72, 73. Dies feriales. 72. Dies pacis Ecclesiae. ibid. 79. 82. Dies pacis Regis. ibib. & 82. Dies novem Lectionum. 91. Dies feriati repentini. 93. Dower, why judged to belong to the Ecclesiastical Court. 132. Downham. 140. Druids, who. 74. The sole Judges of controversies among the old Britain's. 74. Supposed to have used the Greek tongue. 103 Had no knowledge of the Latin. ibid. Dudley (John) Duke of Northumberland and Earl Marshal of England. 170. E Eadmere a Monk of Canterbury made Archbishop of St. Andrews in Scotland. 119. King Eadwigus' Charter of Thanelands granted to Aelswine. 19 Earl Marshals of England. 169, 170, 171. Earl of a County; see Alderman Earldoms not hereditary in ancient times. 13. Earldoms in France. ibid. & 14. Earls among the Saxons. 13, 14. Earl no title of dignity anciently. 13. Their Office depended on the King's pleasure. ibid. An Earls Heriot. 31. Easter-Term, how limited anciently. 83. Easter-week, when exempted from Law business. 76. Ebsam in Surrey. 23. King Edgar's Charter of donation of certain Thanelands. 19 Another Charter granted by him to the Monastery of Hide near Winchester. 20. By whose advice his Laws were made. 61. King Edward the elder, how he proposed his Laws. 61. The first that prohibited Law business on Festivals 77. King Edward the Confessor's Charter of donation to Thola. 20. Several privileges granted to the Cinque-Ports. 26. His Laws by whom collected. 61. His Constitution touching Festivals. 79. Edward Earl of Norfolk and Marshal of England. 168. Died in his minority. ibid. Edwin, son of Othulf, gave certain lands to Archbishop Odo. 29. Elfere a Saxon bequeathed Snodland to the Church of St. Andrews. 128. Published his Will before Odo Archbishop of Canterbury, etc. 130. Elfstane Bishop of Rochester. 130. Elfsy Priest of Croyden. 130. Ellingham. 161. Elmham. 150. Erpingham. 151. Erpingham (Tho.) Commissioner for executing the Office of Earl Marshal of England. 169. Escheats, the signification of the word. 37. No feodal Escheats among the Saxons. 37, 38. Escuage, what in the Empire. 36. Neither its name nor rules used by the Saxons. 37. Essoyning, the manner of it not in use before the Conquest. 27. King Ethelbald's Charter to the Monks of Croyland. 22. Ethelbert the first Christian King of the Saxons. 8. He causes his Laws to be put in writing. ibid. He took somewhat from the Roman law. 102 Etheldreda daughter of K. Alfred, her dowry. 8. King Etheldred ordained every eight Hides of land to find a man for the naval Expedition. 17. His Charter of donation to Aethelwold. 19 Another Charter granted by him to his Thane Sealwyne. ibid. King Ethelstane, whom he consulted in making his Laws. 61. King Ethelwulfs Charter of privileges. 23. He divided his lands by Will among his three sons. 128. Euricus King of the Goths. 102. Exauctoratio Militis. 185. Expeditio, what it signifies in Latin. 17. F Fakenham. 150. Fasti, or Law days among the Romans, why so nam d. 72. Seldom two Fasti together. 75. Fasti proprie. ibid. Fasti intercisi. ibid. Fasti Comitiales. ibid. All the Fasti not applied to Judicature. ibid. Fealty, the definition of it. 35. No Fealty but for a fee. 36. What manner of Fealty among the Saxons. ibid. Felbrig. 152. Felewell. 161. Feodal words, none among the Saxons. 7, 8, 9 Feorme what it signifies in the Saxon tongue. 15 Ferdwite. 37. Festa majora, vel principalia. 91. Festivals, how exempted from Law days. 76. The differences of them. 91. The Festivals of St. Peter and Paul. 92. Of St. George. 93. Of Gunpowder Treason. ibid. A Feud, what it is. 1. It's general and particular definition. 2. Feuds among the Jews. ibid. Among the Gauls. 3, Their original. 4. Made perpetual and hereditary. 5. When and how they became so. ibid. Especially in England. ibid. The difference between them and Benefices. 6, 9 The great growth of them. ibid. No proper Feuds before the Conquest. ibid. Feudal-law generally received in every Kingdom. 5. It's youth, infancy, and full age. 9 Where it had its original. ibid. Feudatarii. 9 Feudum militare & nobile. 4. Rusticum & ignobile. ibid. Feuda majora & regalia. ibid. The word Feudum or Feodum not used in K. Beorredus' days. 9 Fideles, who. 4. Fidelity, what. 59 Fines for Licence of alienation. 33. The Thanelands free from them. ibid. Not in use among the Saxons. 34. Fitz-Alan (Jo.) Lord Maltravers, Marshal of England. 168. Fitz-Osborn (Will.) Lord Marshal to King William the Conqueror. 165. Flegg. 154. Flitcham. 145. Flitchamburrough. 52, 145. Folcland, what. 12. Not alienated without licence. 33, 34. Free from homage. 35. Ford-Park. 110. Forests, belong to the King alone. 118. Subjects can have 'em only in custody. ibid. Fouldage. 162. Franc-almoin. 2, 7. Frank-tenements. 12. Freeborgs or Tithings. 51. Frekenham. 153. G Garbulsham. 158. Gavelkind what, and why so called. 12. Observed throughout all Kent. 43. At first the general Law of all Nations. ibid. Germans, their Customs and Tenors carried into several Countries. 5. They received the Roman Law. 127. Gey-wood. 143. Gilbert, the third son of William the King's Marshal. 166. Made Marshal of England. ibid. Killed in a Tournament. ibid. Gimmingham. 152. Goths, carry the Germane Laws into Spain, Greece, etc. 5. They were the first that put their Laws in writing. 102. Trusted Priests with the passing of wills. 130 Government; the ancient Government of England. 49. etc. 53. Grand-days in France and England. 92. Grand Serjeanty. 2. Grantesmale (Hugh) Marshal under K. William I. 165. Greeks, from whom they had much of their ancient Rites. 74, 127. Gresham. 152. Gressenhall. 150. Grey (Rad. de) exauctoratur. 185. Guthrun the Dane. 61, 77. H Hales. 156. Harkela (Andr. de) exauctoratur. 185. Harleston. ibid. Hartlebury-park. 110. Hawkins▪ Pet) Keeper of Bramsil-park wounded by Archbishop Abbot. 109, etc. Hengham. 157. King Henry I. imprisoned the Bishop of Durham. 62. His Constitution about Festivals and Law-days. 81. King Henry II. ratified the Laws of Edw. the Confess. and Will. the Conqueror. 81. Henry Bishop of Winchester convened K. Stephen to his Synod. 132. Heribannum, what. 17. Heriots paid after the death of great Men. 31, 32 To whom forgiven. 32. The difference between them and Reliefs. 32, 33. By whom, and when first ordained. 32. What the word Heriot signifies. ibid. Heriots and Reliefs issuing out of the same lands. 33. No badge of lands held by Knight-service. ibid. Heydon. 151. High Courts: see, Court of Justice. Hikifricus Pugil quidam Norfolciensis. 138. Hilary-Term, its ancient bounds. 82, 83. The end of it sometimes held in Septuagesima. 95. Hockwold. 161. Holkham. 149. Holland (Tho) Marshal of England. 168. Holland (Tho.) Earl of Kent Duke of Norfolk. 169. Made Earl Marshal of England. ibid. Holland (Tho.) Farl Marshal of England during the minority of John Mowbray. 165. Holme in Norfolk 147, 152 Homage, by whom first instituted. 5. Feodal homage. 34. Of two sorts, ibid. When begun in France and England. ibid. The reason of it. 34, 35. Who are to do it. 35. Usual in Soccage-tenure. 35. As well a personal as a praedial duty. ibid. Homines commendati. 35. Hominium & homagium, what. 34. Homagium ligeum. ibid. Feodale aut praediale. ibid. Hoveden▪ Roger) when he wrote. 31. Howard (Sir John) Kt. created Duke of Norfolk and Earl Marshal of England. 17●. Slain in Bosworth-field. ibid. Howard (Tho.) the son of the former, Earl of Surrey. 170. Imprisoned in the Tower. ibid. Defeated the Scotch under K. Henry VII. ibid. Made Lord Treasurer of England and restored to his father's dignities. ibid. Killed James IU. K. of Scotland in battle. ib. Sent Ambassador into France. ibid. Made Viceroy of England. ibid. Where he died. ibid. Howard (Tho.) the fourth Duke of Norfolk of that name, and Earl Marshal of England. 1●1 Howard (Tho.) the Grandson of the former Earl of Arundel and Surrey. ibid. The first Earl of England. ibid. Made Earl Marshal for life. ibid. Hugh Bishop of Coventry exercised the Sheriff's place. 116. Excommunicated. ibid. De Hum●z (Richard) Tribunus Regis or Marshal to King Henry II. 166. Hundradors. 51. Hundreds, their original. 50. Hundred Courts. 51. Hunting forbidden to Clergymen. 109, 112, 113, 114, 115. Hides, what. 17. When disused. 4●. I Ibreneys (Rad. de) 190. Iceni. 135. Eorum nomina & derivatio. ibid. Icenia. 135. Ejusdem termini. ibid. Coelum & solum. 13●. Ina King of the West Saxons adjusted the quantity of Rent for every Ploughland. 15. By whose advice he made his Laws. 61. Made a strict Law against working on Sundays. 57 Ingolsthorp. 146. Inland, what. 12. Intwood. 157. K. John's Magna Charta. 63. John Marshal to King Henry▪ I. 165. Irregularity of Clergymen, wherein it consists. 109, 112. Ise fluvius unde dictus. 135. Ejusdem aestus. 139. Islepe (Sim) Archbishop of Canterbury. 90. Jury taken out of several Hundreds in a County. 53. Jurours prohibited to have meat, etc. till agreed of their Verdict. 89. Jus Gentium. 2. Justices of Eure when instituted. 27. Justinian the Emperor, when he flourished. 129. He prohibited Clergymen to take cognizance of Wills. ibid. Justitium, what▪ 72. K Keninghall. 158. Kent, the custom of Gavelkind in that County. 43. Kettringham 15●. The King the fountain of all Feuds and Tenors. 1●. The King to have his Tenants lands till the heir has done homage. 3●. The King universal Lord of his whole Territories. 37. Anciently granted Churches to Laymen. 115 Knight, what among the Saxons. 51, 58. Why there are but two Knights of the Shire for a County? 64. Knight's-fees. 3, 4, 51, 58. When introduced. 45. The number of them. ibid. The value of a Knights-fee. ibid. Knight-service 2, 7. Kymberley. 158. S Sacha & Soca, what in the Saxon tongue. 51. Saliques bring the Germane feodal Rights into France. 5. Shall in Norfolk. 151. Sandringham. 146. Sanhadrim, when and where the Judges of it sat. 75. Satrapies among the Saxons. 50. Saxons the first planters of the Germane Rites in Great Britain. 5. Their Charters translated. 7. The manner of making their conveyances. 8 Distinction of persons among them. 11. How many degrees of Honour they had. 16. How they held their lands. 40. What obliged 'em to so many kinds of services. ibid. Saxons very much given to drunkenness. 89. When they took possession of England. 100 They swept away the Roman Laws there. 101 Yet took somewhat from them. 102. Why their Laws were not at first put in writing. ibid. When they had written Laws. ibid. The use of wills unknown to the ancient Saxons. 127. Our Saxons observed the Civil Law in their wills. 128. Scutagium. 36, 37. Sedgeford. 146. Segrave (Nicholas) Marshal of England. 167. signory, wherein it consists. 2. Services, how many sorts of 'em upon lands. 17. Personal services. 40. Praedial. ibid. Alodial. ibid. Beneficiary. ibid. Colonical. ibid. Servitia militaria, what. 46. The difference between them and Servitutes militares. ibid.▪ Seymour (Edward) Duke of Somerset, Nephew of King Edw. VI 169. Made Lord Treasurer and Earl Marshal of England. ibid. Shardlow (Joh) Justice of Oyer, had a licence to hear causes on a Festival. 95, 96. Sharnburn▪ 146. History of the Family. 189, etc. Shelton. 156. Shouldham. 142. Shire gemot, what. 53. Signioral authority, what. 6●. Snetsham. 146, 189, 190, etc. Socage. 3, 7, 33, 43. Socmen. 1●, 15, 57 Sprowston. 153. Stanchow. 146, 19●. Star▪ chamber Court. 94, 95. Stigand Archbishop of Canterbury deposed. 119. Stock-Chappel. 146. Stow-Bardolfe. 140. Strangbow Gilb) Earl of Pembroke and Marshal of the King's Palace. 165. Suitors of the Hundred. 51. When and by whom called at this day. ibid. Summons, the manner of it in the Empire. 36. Sunday, how exempted from Law Suits. 76. Sustenance, what. 59 Swasham. 141. Swainmote-Courts. 85. Syndici, who. 63, 64. Synod of Eanham, when held. 78. T Talbot (George) Earl of Shrewsbury. 171. Executed the Office of Lord High Steward of England. ibid. Tallagium. 60. Tasburg. 156. Tassilo Duke of Bavaria did homage to King Pipin. 34. Tenant▪ lands of how many sorts. 4. Tenants by Knight-service. 4. Tenant in capite. 10. Tenant in menalty. ibid. Tenant Paraval. ibid. Tenant's land or the Tenancy. 12. Tenants what they were in ancient time. 51. Tenants in Socage. 57 Tenants forced to pay a fine upon the marriage of a Daughter. 60. To furnish their Lords with provisions. ibid. To present them with gratuities. ibid. Tenure in capite. 2. By Knight-service. 4, 7. The Original of Tenors. 4. Tenure in Socage. 4, 7. Tenors for Life. ibid. What tenors were in use among the Saxons. 7. When first used. ibid. No tenors in capite among the Saxons. 10. Tenure in capite of two sorts. ibid. The fruits of feodal tenors. 24. The name of tenors not used by the Saxons. 40. Terminus, what it signifies. 71. When the word became frequent. ibid. Terms, their definition and etymology. 71. Several acceptations of the word. 70. Full term and Puisne term. ibid. The Original of Terms▪ 73, & 77. Two Terms among the Welsh. 74. The Terms laid out according to the ancient Laws. 82. The ancient bounds of Hilary-Term. 82, 83. Of Easter-Term. 83. Of Trinity-Term. 84, 85. Of Michaelmass-Term. 85, 86. How Trinity Term was altered. 87. Michaelmass-Term, how abbreviated. 88 Why the Terms are sometime extended into the Vacation. 95. Terra Regis. 57 Terrae testamentales. 12. Terrington. 138. Tertium denarium. 14. Testaments and last wills not in use among the ancient Hebrews. 127. Not found in Scripture before Christ's time. ibid. Expressly mentioned by St. Paul, ibid. Not used by the Saxons or Normans. ibid. The custom of making wills from whom taken up. ibid. How many witnesses to a will required by the Civil Law. 128. Thane or Theoden, who. 10, 11. Their several kinds. 16. Not properly a title of Dignity. ibid. The Etymology of their name. ibid. The quality of their Persons. ibid. The nature of their Land. 17. The word Thane has no relation to war. 21. A Thane's Heriot. 31. Thanelands, not subject to feodal service. 18. Charters of Thanelands granted by Saxon Kings. 19, 20. The occasion of granting them. 21. Thanelands alienated. ibid. Devised by will. 22. Granted to women. ibid. No service upon 'em but what was expressed. ibid. Dispos d of at the pleasure of the owner. 23. Charged with a Rent. ibid. Might be restrained from alienation. ibid. Thanelands and Reveland, what. 38. Thani majores & minores. 16. Thani Regis. ibid. Theinge. 50. His jurisdiction. ibid. Theowes and Esnes, who. 11. Thetford. 158. Thokus Dominus de Sharnburn. 189. Thola the widow of Ore, had a grant of certain lands of K. Edw. the Confessor. 20. Obtained a Licence to devise her Lands and Goods. 34. Thrimsa, what. 15. Thrithingreves, or Leidgerev●s, their Office and Authority. 52. What causes were usually brought before 'em. ibid. Tribunus militum, rei militaris aut exercitus. 165. Tribute. 59 Trimarcesia. what. 3. Trinity-term, its ancient bounds. 84, 85. How it was altered and shortened. 87. Trinodis necessitas. 17, 43. Trithings or Laths. 50. Why so called. 52. Turfs, why so called. 139, 140. Tydd. 139. Tylney. 138. Tylney-smeeth. ibid. V Vacation, what. 72. A particular Vacation appointed by the Longobards. 84. Valvasini. 58. Valvasor. 16, 17, 58. Vassalagium, what. 34. Vassalli. 3, 9 Venatio clamosa, quieta, aut modesta. 109, 114. Villanus, what it signifies in Latin. 14. W De Waceio (Radulphus) Princeps militiae Normannorum. 165. Wallington. 14●. Walpole. 138. Walsham. 153. Walsingham. 149. Walsoke. 138. Walter archdeacon of Oxenford. 100 Walter Bishop of Durham bought Northumberland. 116. Sat himself in the County Court. ibid. By whom killed. ibid. Walter Marshal of England, the fourth son of William the King's Marshal. 166. When he died. ibid. Walton. 138. Walworth (Sir Will▪) Lord Mayor of London. 168. Wapentakes. 50. Watton. 161. Waxham. 153. Wardship, no profits arising from it in the Saxons time. 25. The original of its name. ibid. Wardship in Scotland. 27. Warenna (Guil. de) 19●. Were, or Weregild, what. 15. Westacre. 141. West- Saxon-Law▪ 49. Wic, what it signifies in the Saxon tongue. 156. Wichingham. 151. Wigenhall. 138. William the Conqueror transferred his Country customs into Ireland. 5. Makes Feuds and Tenors hereditary there. ibid. Privileges granted by him to the Cinque-Ports. 26. Gave certain lands to Baldwin Abbot of St. Edmund sbury 45. His Laws made by the consent of the Bishops and Barons. 61. His Constitution concerning Festivals and Law▪ days. 8●. Made a Law that no man should be put to death for any crime. 82. Laws of Scotland, Reg. Maj. 131 Laws (Saxon) in the King's Library, MS. 17. Lind. Cland. Despons. 80. Littleton (Justice) 6. His Tenors. 35. Longobard-laws. 89, 131. Loyseau de Signior. 13, 92. Ludovici Pii Exauctoratio. 185. Vita. 185. Lyndwood. 109. M Major (Joh.) 27. An ancient Manuscript of Saxon Laws in the King's Library. 17. Marculphus. 9, 128, 129. Matthew Paris. 11, 62, 71, 116, 118, 12●, 138, 151, 152, 166, 167. Merula. 5. N Neapolitan and Sicilian Constitutions. 10, 80. Norman Customs▪ 30, 80. Novella of Constantine Porphyrogenneta. 36. O Osbertus. 99 Oswald Bishop of Worcester. 4 P Pancirollus. 148, 154 Pasquier. 13. Paulus Diaconus. 84. Pausanias. 3. Philo Judaeus. 75. Placita Coronae. 60. de Platea (Joh.) 64. Plinius. 138. Polydorus Virgilius. 62, 71. Prosper. 93. R Radevicus de Gest. Frid. I. 82. Radulphus Niger. 90, 117. Ramsey-Abbey MS 29, 53, 128, 139, 140, 146. Rastal. 86. S Selden. 26. Sigonius. 127. Skeneus. 28. Smith (Sir Tho.) 6, 75. Soto. 109, 112. Spelman's Glossary. 1, 3, 12, 15 Codex legum. 96. spelman's Concilia Britannica. 8, 17, 18, 23. Sprott, a Monk of Canterbury. 45. Statius. 84. Stow. 147, 154, 168, 186, 213. Suarez. 109. Suecus (Gravius) 3. Synod of Eanham. 78. T Tabienus. 90, 91. Tacitus. 3, 4, 15, 35, 51, 59, 74, 127, 149. V Vegetius. 147. Vincent. 168, 169. Virgilius. 93. W Walsingham Hypodigma Neustriae. 82, 92, 151, 167. Waraeus. 140. K. William I's. Laws. 82, 84. William of Malmsbury. 119, 145. Y York Herald. 168, 169. FINIS.