The SCOTS CONSTANCY. OR, An Answer to CLEVELAND'S Scots Apostasy. April ●●… 1647. written by Robin ●●●●●…k Stationer IS Cleveland new in print? Is this the fume Of his last cup of Sack? the strong perfume Distilled from his noddle? What, to spew Such vile prodigious curses? nothing new? Poor Crumms of Comfort to a dying cause Of his malignant party; whose applause The meager starveling feeds on; 'tis a feast. At some malignant Tavern: scraps at lest Which noseless Davenant sends: these cram his muse With strong bombasted raptures, to abuse The poor compounders: yet it will not fall One penny of their rate at Goldsmiths Hall. No paper-kites from York, no proclamations To undeceave the people, no observations Upon the King's return; no pregnancy Of new invention: all dull poetry. Where's the Court parasites, to resolve the case Of none-resistance now? what is their place Empty at court? where's Hamond, Fer●, and he Pretends himself Bishop of Ossory? All silent? speechless? dum as Aulicus? What's Heylin's table turned? how comes it thus? No hope, no comfort for malignancy, Except to join with Independency. Cajole the Scots, the City: why so dull? No fine designs abroach? come, one more pull: Where's Digby? in a vault? what, no new plot? Is this the last, to rail and curse the Scot? Send to Kilketto post: what, cannot he Disturb that Kingdom, raise more mutiny? What's France transformed a stone, and will not stir To help your gasping cause? Thou bawling cur, Bark more incessantly: let Denmark hear; He sound snorteth: what will none appear? Where are the Rebels? the Cessation sure Commands them from their bogs, now 'tis secure, To help their Popish Queen; or else to see Her and her favourite in a Monast'ry. Are your designs abortive? is the Scot More faithful to the King? and is the plot Become apparent now? doth Ormond hate Your base designs? doth he congratulate The good success of this blessed Parliament? Forbear your cursed language; come, repent: All things miscarry 'mongst you; and we see The viprous venom of malignancy. This makes you mad, and some; observe, the Scot Breaks not his Covenant; 's constant; Spoils your plot. And had the King kept faith, and not the Queen Been so predominant, we should have seen His blessed reconcilement with the State: But sure his CHARLES most unhapy sat. How darest thou (Sycophant) abuse the King? Is he not just to punish? such a thing Of most profaned cursing, cannot be Endured by any who love piety. Should we retort thy curses, there would be A Volume vented 'gainst malignancy. But Silence is sufficient: 'tis enough T' extinguish thy abhorred stinking snuff. I tell thee Cleveland how to get some praise; Add but those curses to the last new plays: The Stationer, no doubts will give thee pence, Join to the last of is verses thy nonsense, Jeer not the proffer; for thy friends now hate Thy profane curses, and abominate: Thy hateful title doth more fit become Thy sweet companions and friends at Rome. It is not long ago since we did see Thy famous Wentworth's grand Apostasy. The King sh' in safety (grieve not) 'tis with those Who will persuade him never to oppose The good advice of Scotland: not like Laud, Who bid him break his faith, and then applaud That most unkingly breach, unnatural war With his best subjects: no, King Charles is fare From any more such counsel: he doth see The fatal consequence of all flattery. What foul mouthed language thou givest that nation So ancient; with whom a combination France did solicit, England now doth twine, And is completed in that royal line. But what of London's speech? 'tis writ in Gold; With admiration honest men behold His Loyaly: what did the King declare Amongst the Scots? what protestations are Divulged to the world by him? yet he Must be excused for infirmity. But let the noble London's speech be scanned By most, nay all malignants in the land; The proper genuine sense of all will be, We will maintain the King, not Tyranny. And here of purpose thou forgettest the place Where London, was confined; but no disgrace To London's Innocency: we did see Some steps then near to Turkish slavery. That good advice which pious Henderson Gave to the King, thou hat'st to mention: Or that thy flattering Clergy did adore The Scottish nation but a while before: O how their papers then did make you glad? How jocund? but of late exceeding sad. Did you expect a change? And now to see The City right, and the Scots constancy, O how it frets malignants! they had hope By our dissensions to have taken scope To work some new designs; malignancy The brat of Machavell, Independency, His Jesuited brother; and those two Are acting mischief, hoping to undo Two ancient Kingdoms, that they might be free Of Presbyterian and of Monarchy. But we have hopes 'tis far from the intent Of the Scots nation, or our Parliament. What sixty Kings were murdered by the Scots? 'Tis but a fable: thrice as many plots Have acted been of late, to overthrow This rich and ●amous City, and to blow Three Kingdoms into atoms; by such men Who merely vapour, curse and rail: but then We find them most unnatural not to spare The essence of a Parliament: pretend 〈◊〉 fair▪ Great faith and Loyalty; a feigned thing To gain a party, and abuse a King. That hardy nation hath been ever free. And scorned the bondage of base slavery. Read but Thuanus an Historian Who writes impartially; read Buchanan King James his Tutor, one who did not fear The frowns of Kings; was bold, and durst appear I'th' cause of truth in spite of opposition: There we may read the freedom of that nation, Beloved of good men; for their Constancy Recorded is to all posterity. FINIS