INFORMATION For Aeneas c, Town Clerk of Edinburgh.  
AENEAS c having purchased the Office of Town-Clerk of Edinburgh during his Life, upon payment of a Great Sum of Money, which was well known, and allowed by the magistrates for the time; he did, and doth reckon himself Secure, that he shall enjoy the said Office according to his Gift.  
Some of the present magistrates having taken a Disgust at their Clerk, have not been pleased to favour him with their Countenance, and have made many attempts to brangle his Liferent Gift.  
In prosecution of that Design, the magistrates did apply to the last Session of Parliament, in anno 1695, Representing a great many pretended Malversations, which were made very gross in Show and desiring that these Malversation might be Judged in Parliament.  
When the ●etition and Answers were considered, it was moved and urged in Parliament, that the Decision of the pretended Malversations might be remitted ●o the Town Council; But the Estates of Parliament perceiving that the magistrates had Stated themselves as Accusers by offering the Complaint, thought not fit to make them Judges of it, but remitted the Petition with the Answers to the Lords of Session to be discussed summarily as accords.  
These pretended Malversations were represented to be very Attrocious; because it was not expected the Parliament would have time to inquire: but after the Decision was remitted to the Lords of Session, there was no more mention of them; and the World may Judge by that Petition, and what hath since followed, that the Complainers did not relent, but were self convict that the Complaint would appear Groundless in the eyes of any indifferent Judge.  
This Attempt proving abor●ive: Th● M●gistrats reckoned themselves Judges of all other Malversations not stated before the Parliament; And dilgent Search and Ex●iscation was made for new pretences, and a Libel was framed with great Secrecy, and at last the Clerk was Cited to Answer in 24 Hours, and all was prepared to deprive him: But in that short Space, he made full and convincing Answers to any indifferent Judge, and did ap●ly to the Lords of Session, Representing the Libel and Answers with the just reason he had to suspect his Judges, and offered to Debate his Cause summarily before the Lords, which Reason of Advocation carried so much Light and evidence along with it, that the Lords did very readily Advocat the Cause.  
The Advocation put a Period to these pretended Malversations also, for the magistrates very well know that none of them would sustain, unless they themselves were the Judges, they were wearied of their Clerk, and impatient to be fettered by the Legal ●ye of his Liferent Gift.  
The next D●sign was laid yet closser, they had perceived that any Citation or Advertisement, would give the means of Defence and Application to an indifferent Judge, and therefore, they invented a pretence of Regulation, but with a plain Design to Regulat the Clerk out of Doors, on this pretence they required Access to the Records truly to expiscat further Crimes,& all was again prepared, that right or wrong the Clerk might once be ●●p●●ved, and another put in his Place; and he left to seek his Reparation against the Magis●ra●s of Edinburgh, who are a great Party; and by sad Experience to the Town, have been fou●d ●o manage these kind of Processes Liberally on the public Expenses. But the Clerk bei●●●erfectly Informed of this project, he applied to the Lords by a 2d Bill of Advocation, w●er●o● the full Tenor is hereto subjoined, in which it was shortly Represented to the Lords, that there was a Committee of the Town Council appointed to Examine the deuce of the Town Clerks Chamber, and to Regulat the same, and also to Expiscat Grounds of a Quarrel against the Clerk, and to proceed summarily, and give forth Sentence upon the Report of that Committee, and showing the just cause to suspect, partiality in all that Procedure: And therefore desiring that all Regulation, or further Cognition of the Clerks Crimes, should be Advocat to the Lords; and the magistrates Discharged from further Proceeding, or Cognos●ing the Clerks Malversations: And the Lords upon Report in presentia, did also pass the said 2d. Advocation.  
The Clerk did believe he was secure, and that all pretended Malversations, either already found out, or to be expiscat, were stated before the Lords of Session, by the R●… of Parliament, and the several Advocations; and to put the matter yet further beyo●… ●…stion he raised a Process before the Lords, for declaring his Right: To the effect, that the Lords might be his only competent Judges.  
The Ele●●ion of the new magistrates doth now approach, and it was expected that magistrates might have been chosen, who would not have the same unkindness to the Clerk, but the former Attempts proving ineffectual because they did not debord from the methods of Law, and Law would not serve the purpose: The ●ame influenc● prevailed wholly to neglect and pass over the very forms of Law, as well as material Justice; and in open contempt of the foresaid second Advocation, discharging all further cognition of the Clerk's Malversations, th●y did upon the 4th of September Instant, summarily deprive the Clerk, without any Compl●int exhibit against him, or any other formality: But the Clerk having come to attend the Council according to his Duty, certain picked out alleged neglects were stated before the Council; and immediately the Clerk was turned out of Doors, till they should determine upon the matter,& after some debate, the Clerk was deprived, another name to his Place. Locks were presently put upon the Clerk's Chamber door,& a sentinel was put there to secure it.  
The Clerk doth not cha●ge this upon the Town-council, it was prepared and projected by a few, who carried it on, others were surprised, and severals not clear to proceed in any such summar manner.  
As to the form of procedure, The Clerk needs use no Argument, but only entreats, that the true matter of Fact before-mentioned may be considered, which he will verify in every circumstance: He will justify his innocence in the matter, in due time, and make it appear, that the pretended Omissions now charged upon him, are yet more frivolous than any of the former Articles, which evanished, so soon as they were appointed to be stated before an equal and indifferent Judge: But being deprived of his Possessi n, without the form of Law by Judges suspect and bound up, that they could not proceed at all, much less without a Complaint or Process, he ought to be summarily reposs●st: And he doth not in the least question that the honour of the Government, and public justice of the Nation will be concerned to vindicat and repair the indignity and affront that is done to His Majesties Authority, an● to t●e Lords of Session, who bear the same, in as far as the magistrates have proceeded directly contrary to the prohibition cont●ined in the Letters of Advocation, duly intimated to the magistrates, whereby they were expressly prohibited, and discharged to judge any of the Clerk's Malve●s●tions; and that there may not be the least shadow or subterfuge, upon pretence, that the alleged Omissions are posterior to the Advocation and Prohibition therein contained: The Clerk doth positively aver, that all the pretended Omissions charged against him, are prior to b●th the saids Advocations: And further, the Prohibi ion, as well as the reason of the Advocation, is general, that they should meddle with no Malversations, because the magistrates and Council had stated themselves, as Adversaries and Complainers, and their enmity is now further verified, by what hath past since.  
As to the Material Justice of the Sentence, the Clerk is not in a present condition to make a full and exact State of what is charged upon him, nor doth so much as know the Tenor of the Sentence against him, because all he heard of his Crime were a few words expressed by the magistrates, to his great surprise, and so he was removed, until he was called to hear the Councils Interloquitor red; but the magistrates have been very careful to take up the minutes of that Journal, and the Sentence out of the Under-Clerks hands, that he may not so much as know what is charged or determined against him, or be in condition to vindicat himself in the eyes of the World: But whether Guilty or not Guilty, the Illegal manner of Deprivation requires that he should be repossessed,& the Cause Judged in the forms; yet that he may not ly under the imputation of guilt, in the mean time he will fairly state all that was charged upon him, as far as he can collect either from his Memory of what past at the time, or by information of what any of the Council pretend, to vindicate their procedure.  
The Charge is, That Tacks set by the magistrates and Council, are only Signed by the magistrates, and the Clerk by his Office Signs for the rest of the Common Council, besides the magistrates: And it is the duty of the Clerk to see Witnesses Adhibite, and Subscribing as Witnesses to the Subscription of the magistrates and Tacks-men: Nevertheless he Malversed by n●glecting his Duty in the whole Tract of 10 or 11 Tacks, which are all utterly null and ineffectual by his neg●ect: In so far as, 1. He Signed one or more Tacks as Nottar for the Community, but got no Witnesses adhibite to them. 2. Other Tacks were not so much as Signed by him for the Community, nor were any Witnesses adhibite to the magistrates, or Tacks-mens Subscriptions, and so the Tacks are null through his default, which is a continued Tract of Supine Negligence. 3. Even as to the form of Procedure, they allege a Precedent in the case of Sir William Thomson, who was summarily deprived by the magistrates, without Process, and their Sentence was sustained by a solemn Decision of the Lords.  
To this mighty Charge it is Answered in general, that the Clerk did not omit one Circumstance of his Duty, but was grievously and unjustly oppressed in the whole matter, of setting of Tacks; nor is there an Accuser, nor any damage actually sustained, or which possibly could be sustained, holding the matter of Fact to be true, as is alleged.  
The Clerk freely acknowledges, It is suitable to his Office and Duty, to Sign for the Community, and likewise to see Witnesses adhibite, and so long as he was allowed he did his duty exactly; but the magistrates, and particularly the Thesaurer, were pleased to envy the just Casuality of a compliment in use to be payed by the Tacks-men at the Signing of Tacks, and so soon as the Tacks mentioned in the Charge were Signed by the magistrates, the Thesaurer in presence, and by allowance of the Council, took up the Tacks from the Council-Board, on presence forsooth; That the Tacks being signed by the magistrates, Blank as to the Sums and Tack●mens Names, it was not fit to trust the Clerk with them, and did not allow the Clerk to be present when the Tacks were Signed by the Tacks-men, but caused Sign the same privately in his own Chamber, without any advertisement to the Clerk or his Servants to be present; the Thesaurer took no notice to adhibite Witnesses, so that some Tacks have no Witnesses insert, others none Subscribing; yea, after the Tacks were Signed in this irregular manner, the Th●saurer was not then careful to advertise the Clerk, or to put the Tacks in his hand, but of the Tacks 4 or 5 remain yet in the Thesaurers hands, and the r●mainder which were Signed in the Month of October, were many Months after given in to the Under-Clerks Servant by the Thesaurer, and were never in the Clerks hands, or under his trust first nor last, but were brought by that Servant at the hour of Mr. Mcleod's leod's Deprivation, and delivered by him at the Council Table.  
This Servant who had the Papers, has not so much as an immediate dependence on Mr. c, the Under-Clerk his Master is a deputy of the Councils nomination, and depends immediately upon them.  
These being the true Circumstances of the Matter of Fact, let the whole World judge whether the Thesaurer did not unjustly encroach on the Clerks Office and Casuality, or if the Clerk was guilty of any neglect of his Duty.  
This treatment of the Clerk was so extraordinary and injurious, that possibly t●e Matter of Fact r●presented by the Clerk, may not at first gain full credit, but to verify the same, the Clerk is well persuaded.  
1. That the Thesaurer will aclowledge, that the Tack were so taken up, and privately Signed, which will be fortified, if need be is, by the Testimony of the Tacks-men and Cautioners. 2. The Thesaurer will aclowledge, that 4 or 5 of these Tacks remained in his hand, at the time when the Clerk was Challenged. 3. The whole Members of the Council will prove that the Tacks were taken up by the Thesaurer in Face, and by Allowance of Council. 4. The Under-Clerk, and his Servant who are the ordinary Witnesses to all the Tacks, being asked how they came not to Sign as Witnesses, did declare in pre●ence of Council, at the time when the Clerk was deprived, that they could not sign, because they did not see the Tacks-men subscribe.  
The M●g●strats further alleged, That whatever may be said, as to the Signing of the Witnesses, yet why did the Clerk neglect to Sign for the Commuity in all the Tacks, seing the magistrates Signed, and why did he Sign for the Commun●ty in some, and Ommit in others.  
It is Answered very plainly, It was neither usual nor safe to Sign for the Community at the time, when the magistrates Signed; because Sir William Thomson's Crime was, that having ●igned for the Community the Tack fell in the Tacks-mens hand without signing, whereby the Town was Bound, and the Tacks-men Loose, and therefore since that time, Clerks do not adhibit their Subscription for the Community, till the Tacks men have subscribed, because, until the Clerk sign for the Community, the Tack is incomplete, and so tho' it should fall by, or come in the hands of the Tacks-men, the Town can never be prejudged, and the Thesaurer having got the Tack subscribed priva●ly by the Tacks-men, it was his fault that the Clerk had no opportunity to sign for the community.  
2. As to the Tacks signed by the Clerk for the Community, as he remembers, there is but on in that Circumstance. And it is so far from being a further Charge, that it fully evidences the Clerks care to do his Duty, when ever he had access to do it, which after all was not for a considerable time after it was signed; For the Thesaurer having unjustly encroached, by taking up the Tacks, and the Council having allowed him in it, the Clerk might very well have refused, to have concerned himself further in the matter; yet so soon as any of these Tacks came to the Clerks hands, signed by the T●cks-men and Cautioners, he did adhibit a Subscription, for the Council, ●hich is all that is properly his Duty, he could not cause Witnesses Subbe, because he knew not who were Witnesses to the Tacks mens Sub●criptions nor knew he the Date of it And th s Tack, which is signed by the Clerk is the only Importan Tack in all the Charge all theremanent Tacks which came never to the Cl●rks hands, being only of the smaller Customs, and thete is only resting of them al●●ne ●uar●er.  
2. The Town neither did, nor could possibly receive any material damage, by all these pretended Ommission, because the Town Tacks are all set by Roup and the Form of Roup is, First, The Articles and Cond●tions of the Roup are set down in writ, the Party pre●erred takes Instruments, and his Offer is presently set down, and signed by him in presence of the Council; So that albeit there were no Tack, or that the Tack should labour under any nullity, the Tacks-man is bound by signing his Offer, and by possessing, by virtue of the Roup, and therefore it hath not been a general custom to grant formal Tack; at all of the small Customs, such as these in question are, but the Subscribed Roup hath been generally found sufficient, without any further Tack. and therefore, there and ther was, nor could be any damage, and ●eside Ommissions, though they could really be instructed, as in this case, there is not one circumstance of neglect in the Clerk, yet they are not relevant to infer Deprivation, especially in matters of small moment for there ought always to be a Proportion, and Measure betwixt the Crime and the Punishment.  
And whereas it is alleged, that the Council did proceed as summarily, and upon as slender Grounds in the case of Sir William Thomson, and their Sentence was sustained by the Lords of Session,  
It is answered 1. The Procedure against Sir William Thomson, was of no good consequence to the Town, and very little approven by the Nation: and after much Charge on both sides, the Matter was ended by Transaction, whereby Sir William got 4000 marks out of the Office of yearly Annuity during his life, without trouble, or attendance: And because the superplus of the deuce of the Office were very inconsiderable, the succeeding Conjunct Clerks got 2000 marks yearly, payed out of the Common-Good during Sir Williams life-time: And after all the Clerks that were name to succeed him, did Resign; and a new Gift was granted upon his dismission; nor was that Decreet ever Extracted: and if the Transaction had not prevented, it would have probably furnished a Prece●ent to the Clerks in this case. And therefore that practic was ever since, rather considered as a Scat-Crow, than a Copy to be Transcribed.  
The cases differ vastly; For 1. In that case there was an unjustifiable Omission, which might have been of great damage to the Town, instructed and ackn●wledged: Sir William desired no delay of Procedure but judicially submitted himself to the Town. 2. In that case it was specially remarked that his Office was gratuitous 3. There the magistrates had shown no evil Intention or Malice against their Clerk, whereas here they were stated as Accusers before the Parliament, and upon that Ground two Advocations had past by the Lords of Session; the last of which, contained a general ●rohibition, that they should not Judge of any Malversation of the Clerk; yet in manifest contempt, they have Judged and Deprived upon pretended Omissions, anterior to the said Advocations duly intimated.  
And lastly, because the magistrates mention a Precedent, the Clerk condescends upon another, in the case of William Bell Town-Clerk of Linlith●ow, where the magistrates having Formerly deprived their Clerk, upon a Letter impetrat from the late King James, and he being restored, they deprived him again, not in such a Preposterous and Arbitrary Method as this was; but being warned to attend the Court, at a certain diet Lybels were exhibit against him; and he alleging that he had not received Doubles of the Lybels, and craving a delay, it was granted for one day; and in stead of Attending, he came to Edinburgh to procure an Advocation; therefore the magistrates the next day, did proceed to Deprivation in absence, and name a Successor.  
The Clerk applied to the Privy Council, Representing the former Hardship he had received, and that there was no competent time allowed to obtain Suspension or Advocation, before pronouncing and executing the Sentence, and upon that Ground after full Debate, he was Reponed by the Privy Council: and the magistrates having made a second Application, the same was Rejected, and he re-possessed, by virtue whereof, he enjoys his Office to this day.  
This practic is late, about a 12 Month ago was fully Debate, and considered by the Lieges, as a Security of their Places and Possessions, that the same might not be summarily inverted: And the Ground of the Decision quadrats, viz. the Malice of the magistrates, only in the present case; beside their known Malice, there was a legal Restraint upon them. The magistrates of Linlithgow used the Formality of a libel, and were so bountiful as to allow a Double, and a Day to Answer, and the Clerk did not attend them at that Day: whereas here, there was no Accuser, no libel, no Process, no Delay, but all precipitantly done in an hour; and the Clerk tu●ned in to the Back-Closs under Observation of one of their Number, Locked up, and in a manner imprisoned, till he received his Sentence: and when he was called in to hear the pre●ended Sentence, and being moved by the illegality of it, he did protest against it and particularly objccted the Advocation Signet; and Intimat, the Under Clerk was Discharged by the Provost in face of Council, to receive the Instrument Money, or extend the Instrument, which Command the Under Clerk obeied: and on his refusing to extend the Instrument, on no other pretence then that the Provost had Discharged him, there was an Instrument taken against him.   

The ADVOCATION  
WILLIAM, &c. For as meikle, as it is Humbly meant ad shown to Us, by Our Lovit, Mr. Aeneas c Town Clerk of Edinbugh, that where the M●gistrats of the said Burgh, have appointed a Comm●tee of the Town Council to Examine the deuce of the Town Clerks Chambr, and to Regulat the same, as also to Expiscat Grounds of Quarrel against the said Complaier, and upon report of the said Committee to proceed most summarily, and give forth Senteces, and Acts of Council against the said Complainer most Wrongously and Unjustly, Cosidering, it is of verity, That. 1. The saids magistrates have shown themselves most Partial and suspect, and were formerly, the said Complainers Accusers; And whereupon the Lords of Council and Session, Did already sustain Advocation at his Instance on another Occasion. 2. Since that Advocation, the saids magistrates have shown an extraordinary Disdain and H●red to the saids Complainers person, in so much that they have Deserted the ordinary Place of Meeting of the Town Council, only out of Unkindness to him; and lest he should have Occsion to Exerce his Office, their Meetings are kept in private places, or the Provost his Hous● to which the said Complainer has no Access, nor is Advertised; and do daily malign, Tra●ce, and declare thei● ill Intentions in relation to him. 3. By the Nature of the said Coplainers Gift, he is Secured for Life, in all the Emoluments, Profits, and Advantages, whi● any of his Predecessors were in Possession of, with all the casualties belonging thereto use and Wont, whereupon he raised a Declarator before the Lords of Our Council& Session, against and magistrates of t●e Good Town for hearing it, found& Declaired, that the ordinary Casuali je& Profits of the Chamber, whereof he is now in Possession, are the same that were enjoy by former Clerks o● the Good Town their Fiftieth years by past, and upwards, and are r more than Competent Provisions and Allowances, for Pains and Expense, and Attendanc● and the present Attempt is but a further Prosecution, and a new Shape of the former ●kindness; and ought ●n the like m●nner to be Advocat. 4. The said Complainer's Right ling so Established, it's not in the power of the magistrates to Regulat the same, without the Athority of th● Lords of Our Cou●cil and Session during the Life of the said Complainers, and that ever Aut●ority an Extraordinary Commission o Parliament may have, yet a Town Cou●il cannot preten● to Evacuat the Clerks Right under the Notion of Regulation, 5. The Cgnoscing of Malversations against the said Complai●er ought likewise to be Advocated, becase of the foresaid suspicion o● the Judge: And likewise of the said Complainers Declara●r, upon the hail Heads and Clauses of the Gi●t; and for Declaring likewise that he is free o Malversation, and ought to Bruick his Office during his Life, peaceably, comform to his sal Commission as the said Gift, and summons of Declarator du●ly Executed, and call, shown to Our saids Lords has Testified, and so Our saids Lords may evidently perceive how V●ongously, and Unjustly the saids magistrates intend to proceed in the said Matter, and proounce and give forth Acts of Regulations, and Ex●iscat Grounds of Quarrel against the sal Complainer, albeit they be no ways Judges compentent to him therein for the Reasons and Causes foresaid, and others, &c. And therefore, the foresaid Procedure ought, and should and Advocate from the saids magistrates to the saids Lords as only Judges Competent and unsupected thereto, and the saids magistrates ought, and should be Discharged from farther proceeding, or Cognoscing in the said Matter, or Troubling, Pursuing, or Insisting against the sai● Complainer, as to Cognoscing of Malversations, or Regulating of Clerks deuce in time comng for the Reasons and Causes foresaid, &c. as it alleged. OUR WILL IS HERE●ORE, And We Charge you, that ye lawfully summoned, Warn, and Ch rge the saids Magstrats, and their Clerk-deput Personally, or at their dwell ing-places, to Comp●ar ●efore Our saids Lords of Council and Session at Edinburgh, or where i● shall happen them to be for the time, the First Day of June next to come, in the Hour of Cause with continuaion of Days, bringand with them all minutes and Acts of Regulations made by them in the foresaid Matter to be Seen and considered by Our saids Lords, and to hear and see the samen Advocat from them to Our saids Lords, and they Discharged from any farther Proceeding, Cognoscing and Determining thereintil in time coming, in manner underwritten, Attour, We, and Our said Lords, in Our Name have Advocat, and hereby advocates the foresaid Procedure, Acts, Minutes and Regulation, as to the Cognoscing of Malversations or Regulating the Clerks deuce,( after the report made by the Lord Ordinar in presentia) from the saids magistrates to Our saids Lords themselves as only Judges compe●ent and nsuspect thereto, Discharging hereby, the saids magistrates from all farther Proce●ding, Cognoscing, and Determining in the said Matter● or Troubling, Pursuing, or insisting against the said Complainer as to the Cognoscing of Malversations, or Regulating the Clerks deuce for the Reasons foresaid and others, &c. and of their Offices in that part in time coming, &c. Signet the 27th. of February 1696, Intimat the said Day by Mr. William Dallas N●●tar public.   

At Edinbirgh, the Eight Day of September One Thousand Six Hundred Ninety Six years, and of His Majesties Reign the Eighth Year.  
THe which Day in presence of me Nottar public, and Witnesses under Subscriving, Aeneas M_cleod Town Clerk of Edinburgh being in company with James Nasmith deputy own Clerk of Edinburgh, and several others; The said Aeneas M_cleod shewed tht uopn the Fourth Day of September Instant, after hearing of a pretended Sentence of Derivation red against himself, whereby the magistrates and Council of Edinburgh did D●p●ve him of his employment of Town Clerk of the said Burgh, he did in presence of the sai● magistrates and Council allege that their Procedure was Summar and Illegal as to the man, and inequitable as to the Cause, in as far as he could not be Deprived of his Gift which wa for Life, without a Libel or Citation, as also, that there was an Advocation, Signed and l●imat, and called for at the Minut-Book, whereby, the magistrates of Edinburgh were Diharged from farther Troubling, Pursuing, or Insisting against him, as to the Cognoscing 〈◇〉 Malversations in time coming, and therefore, Protested that whatever Cost, Skeath, Damage, or Expenses he should sustain through the foresaid Summar, Illegal, and unjust Depri●tio●, should be Repaired by the Community, and by every particular Member of Council no had Voted the same, as being wilful and open Contemners of Authority, and thereupon t●k Instruments in the hands of James Nasmith deputy Town-Clerk of Edinburgh, of which Inrument the said Aeneas c required an Extract from the said James Nasmith, whereinto i was Answered by the said James Nasmi●h, that he did aclowledge that the said Aeneas c did ask from him an Instrument in the Terms above-mentioned in Face of Council, but that he and said James Nasmith was then expressly Discharged by the Provost of Edinburgh either to rece●e Instrument Money, or giveforth any Instrument upon the premises, and therefore refused o give the said Aeneas c an Extract of his said Instrument, whereupon the said Aeneas c asked& took Instruments in the hands of Me Nott●r public, under Subscriving, their things ●ere done within the House of Mistress Henderson Vintner in Edinburgh being upon the East Ed of the Parliament Closs betwixt the Hours of Seven and Eight at Night, Day, month, ●ear of GOD, and of His Majesties Reign Respective foresaid, before, and in Presence of Mr. Jo● Mckenzie one of the Principal Clerks of Council and Session, Mr. Alexander c Advocat ●nd William Stuart Writer in Edinburgh, with divers others, Witnesses specially called and requed to the premises.  ●a esse ut prmaettitur assero Ego Jacobus Muirhead Notarius Publicus in Premissis requsitus testante manu mea signoque. 
which Instrument is Signed by the foresaids Witnesses.