For every Individual Member of the Honourable House of Commons.  
●…R,  
THe law of England having always been esteemed by me the visible state, security of my life, liberty, and propriety, for the preservation of which, I have in the field with my sword in my hand often run the h●zzard of death, and being oppressed contrary thereunto by the present House of Lords in june 1646. I coould do no less for my own preservation, and the preservation of the liberties and freedoms of my native country, then to fly by way of Appeal to the authority and jurisdiction of your House (my legal Peers and Equals) who by the Commons of Eng●and are chosen and betrusted to be the great and grand Patrons and Guardians of their liberties and freedoms, and ought not to suffer them to be trodden underfoot by all the Lords in England. And my formal Appeal from the prison of Newgate, I made unto your house, the 16. of june 1646. (now ●rinted in the 9 10, 11. pages of The Free man's freedom vindicated) which was accepted, and approved of by your House, and also read and debated, and committed to a select and chosen Committee, ●here Mr. Henry Martin had the Chaste, (before whom I made my plea, and since printed it, and cal●●● An Anatamy of the Lords tyranny) who was on●y authorised in matter of fact to examine all the Lords proceed with me, there being then, as appealed to me no scruple either in the house, or any of ●hat Committee about the Lords jurisdiction over a Commoner, and having most illegally, in a tyrannical and chargeable imprisonment, stayed above ●6 months for that report, there being, as to me appears, some more scruples in your house now about the Lords jurisdiction, than was when I first appealed to you; your house resolved upon 15. October, 1647. anew, to commit the whole ●atter of my ●eport then lately made by Mr. Martin, to a new Committee, who are to consider of precedents in ●his and the like cases, and to state their opinions to the house, what they think fit to be done thereupon, and the special care of it is referred to Mr. Maynard, before whom and the Committee I appea●ed the 20. October, 1647. and had liberty to make my grand Plea in point of law against the Lord's ●urisdiction, and their unjust and illegal deal with me, which grand plea, with my addition●●●lea) herewith present unto you, entreating you as one of my judges, seriously to read and consider I●.  
And on the 1. November 1647, upon a motion in your house for an addition to my Committee, (that so my long and unsupportable attendance may come to some issue) all the Members of your House that will come to my Committee are added to it, and by the power of that Committee, I am summoned before them the 8. present, to state my questions, upon which their results or judgements are 〈◊〉 ●low, or be grounded, and being before them, apprehended some conceptions in them, that the matter was very difficult and weighty, although I conceive in my aforesaid pleas, I have made it as ●●●in as the Sun that shines at noon day, that the Lords have dealt most illegally and unjustly with me, and dare venture my life and being upon what I have before both Committees said against, at the Lawyer, in England in point of law, but in regard I apprehend (for all I have said) that there is some ●cruples in some Members of that Committee, and may be much more in divers in the house, when it is reported in that slender manner that it is like, there being not any results upon the 〈◊〉 question 〈◊〉 the Committee. I therefore crave leave in writing to state my questions I presented to the Committee, with some additions to them, and in the first place I lay down this position, which at my utmost ●●●ll● according to the rules of law and justice, I will make good, viz.  
That the book called my plea to judge Reeves, for wrighting of which I was summoned to the Lords bar, it an honest and just book, free from scandals and falsehoods, and hath nothing but 〈◊〉 in it, and therefore neither punishable by the House of Lords, nor any Court of justice in England, but admit it were full of notorious scandals in the highest nature, the main question will 〈…〉.  
1. Whether the house of Lords by the Law of England, have any original jurisdiction, in 〈◊〉 o●●●●●ly, to summon me a free commoner of England up to their bar to answer a charge for 〈◊〉 the foresaid book, or any other book though never so scandalous in itself? which I positively deny, and s●●ven strong reasons or arguments I made before, and gave unto the foresaid Committee, which you may please to read in my Grand Plea pag. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 〈◊〉 of which briefly are. 
〈◊〉 also my plea Mr. Martin, pa. 9 10.   
First that the Lords sit not in their House by any power or authority, d●●●● from the people's free election and choice, but are merely and altogether the ●●●●tures of the King, made by his prerogative, sometimes of the basest and corr●p●●●● of the people, being the mere issues of his will, who himself is limited and bounded by the law, 〈◊〉 who by his writ that summons them to sit in Parliament, only empowers them to confer and treat 〈◊〉 him (or afford their Council) of certain hard urgent affairs, concerning himself, the State, 〈◊〉 defence of the Kingdom of England, and the Church thereof, but my pretended offence touch●● none of these things. And besides, the Lords had no conference nor treaty with the King, their prerogative foutaine, Ergo: but read my Grand plea, pag. 6, and 7.  
Secondly, I was the 10. of june 1646. summoned up to the Lords bar, to answer such things a●● stood charged with before their Lordships, concerning a pamphlet entitled as before, which did not in the least belong unto the jurisdiction of their Court, but at the most, is merely an action tryable at the Common law, and no where else, (see Cooks 5. part report, pag. 125. De libellis fam●sis, and 13. Hen. 7. Relway, and 11 Eliz. Dier 285. and 30. Assize, pla. 19 and 3. E. 1. chap. 33. and 37. E. 3.18. and 38. E. 3.9. and 42. E. 3.3. and 2. R. 2.5 and 12. R. 2.11. and 1 part of your own book 〈◊〉 Decl. pag. 208. read my Plea pag. 7, and 8.) And being so, they ought not to have meddled with it, it being a known maxim in law, that when an ordinary remedy may be had, an extraordinary is not to be made use of.  
Thirdly, no man is to be imprisoned nor judged, but by the known, established and declared law●● of the land, see the Petition of Right. But there is no established law of the land for the judgement of the Lords in any thing, where the King their creature is not concurrent, 14. E. 3. c. 5. Which statute plainly shows that in delays of justice or error in judgement in inferior Courts, (which is all the causes they have jurisdiction of by law, which binds them as well as any other Court, 4. H. 4.23.) there ought to be a Petition to the King, and a Commission from him to them, to give them cognizance or power of it, but none of this was in my case Ergo: but read my Plea, pag. 8. and 9  
Fourthly, By Magna Charta, and 3. E. 1.16 and the Petition of Right, no man is to be judged 〈◊〉 by his Peers or Equals, that is men of his own condition, and by due process, by indictment, presentment, or original writ, by a jury of his Equal, of good and lawful people of the same neighbourhood, according to the old law of the land. But the Lords are none of my Peers, See Clerks case 5. part Cooks reports, and his 2. part institutes. sol. 28.29.48.50. and Sir Simon de Berisfords' case 4. E. 3. R●t. 2. Neither had I in any one particular any legal proceeding, being summoned before any charge was filled against me Ergo: but read my plea pag. 9, and 10.  
Fiftly, By the laws of this land, no man is to be judge in his own case, ●. H. 6. sol. 1●. and 5. E●●●. Dier. 220. and Dr. bonham's case 8. part Cooks reports. But the Lords were with me complainants prosecutors, witnesses, fury and judges, Ergo: but read my plea, pag. 10. 11. and 1. part book, D●●. pag. 38. 39 201, 278.  
Sixtly, if the Lords judgement originally were binding against me, than a few Lords would bl●● not only me, but all the Commons of England, (who one by one may be served by them as I am) and that without any hope of redress, they being judges still in the appeals (which both law and rea●●● abhors, 1. part book Decl. pag. 41. 150. 207. 496. 637. 690. 726. 728) and to by this means the weal and safety of the people (called by you the supreme law, 2. part book Decl. pag. 879.) is totally destroyed, and we the Commons of England made the perfectest slaves in the world, by having o● fundamental laws destroyed and made Ciphers, and the power of our representatives destroyed and made cyphers, which ●s an act of higher treason than ever was committed by Str●fford, and 〈◊〉 thousand times more justly deserves his doom, than his crime (of but endeavouring to subvert 〈◊〉 fundamental laws) did, but read my grand plea, pag. 11, and 12.  
Seventhly, The Lords being the mere creatures of the King made by his will, and pleasure, and 〈◊〉 there as prerogative persons only, and yet in law and by their own principles, as Lord's with●●● the King they have to prerogative, and yet have with a witness a●ted upon me, etc. without the King or his particular Commission, which makes all they have done unto me to be null, and void, 〈◊〉 in law and reason, and renders them in my apprehension (for this their habit●●llnesse in the w●●●● and highest of tyranny) to have forfeited their power and honour, and 〈◊〉 ought any 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 trusties of the people, (and who should be the carefully and watchful Guardians of their laws ●nd liberties) to be owned or acknowledged to be a house of Peers, but a company of Apostates falno ●●om their first institution, and absolutely degenerated into a pack of tyrants, and therefore in equity, ●eason, and justice, aught as well as the Star-Chamber, to be plucked up by the roots and transcendently ●●ned besides.  
The second question that at the Committee I truly stated was this, whether it be warrantable or justifiable by law in the House of Lords to summon me a free and legal Commoner of England up to ●heir b●r, to answer a charge before any be in being, or filled against me? which also I positively deny, ●nd have proved to be most illegal in my plea last year before Mr. pag. 8: 9 see also the 4th reason ●efore.  
My third question at the Committee I stated to this effect, whether by the law of England, it be justifiable for the Lords to summon me up to their bar to answer a charge, and then when I come there, refuse to show it me, though desired by me, but examine me upon interrogatories against myself? which I also confidently deny, and for proofs se● your own Votes made for me in your house the 21. of May 1641. against the Star-Chamber, and the Lords own decree made in that very cause 13. Feb. ●645. printed in the last page of my relation of my proceed at their bar.  
My fourth question that now I truly state is this, whether it be warrantable by law in the Lords to summon me to answer a charge at their bar before they have any crimes against me, and Ex officio to examine me, and thereby either force it to stand mute, (which they would construe a contempt) or to plead for myself, and from my plea to p●ck quarrels against me; and so totally wave the thing they originally summoned me for, and commit me for a pretended crime, committed Ex postsacto, to remain in prison, during their pleasure? which is ad infi●itum even till doom's day in the afternoon, for they will never be just till then, and so I shall never be released by ●hem: see their warrant of commitment of the 11. june 1646. and my printed plea to Mr. Martin, pag 5. and 7.  
My fift question I state is this, whether it be warrantable by the law of England, for the Lords to summon me up to their bar, where by their illegal deal with me, I am necessitated to declare against their assuming a jurisdiction over me, and before them under my hand and seal, appeal to my legal judges the House of Commons, and yet notwithstanding they got on to judge me, before my appeal (which was a supersedeas) be determined? see my reasons in the 9 p. of my plea to Mr. Martin.  
My sixth question I state thus, whether it be warrantable by law for the Lords to summon me up to their bar after my appeal to the House of Commons, and when I am by force brought, say nothing to me, but command me to kneel at their bar, and for refusing so to do, commit me during their pleasure close prisoner to Newgate, without pen, ink, or paper, or the access of any whatsoever in any kind, but only my keeper, and then to set Sergeant Finch, Mr. Hail, Mr. Hear●ne, and Mr. Glover, to draw up a charge against me, for pretended crimes committed after my first summons, and without ever giving me notice, or suffering me to speak either with my wife, friends or council, to bring me up the third time after three week's cl●se and barbarous tyrannical restraint, to answer a charge● see their warrant of close imprisonment of the 23. of june 1646. and the 5. 9 pag of my plea to Mr. Martin.  
My seaventh question, I state thus, whether any Court in England that meddles with that which by law they have no jurisdiction of, can either fine or imprison the party summoned before them, in such a case for contemning, affronting or abusing of them? or whether it was any affront or contempt, (in law) in me, for maintaining in high language at the Lords bar my legal rights against their 〈◊〉 ●●ping encroachments see my reasons and arguments in the 12, 13, 14. pages of my grand plea.  
My eight question is this, whether or no it be justifiable by the law of England, for the house of Lords for a pretended or real misdemeanour, totally to destroy my contin●ment or continuance by fining me 4000 l. being more than ever I wa● worth? and making me uncapable for ever to 〈◊〉 my office either Marshal or Civil in Church or Common wealth, and seven years' imprisonment in the Tower of London, 11. or 13. weeks of which in the Tower I was divorced from my wife, and all my friends, and the names of all those that came to visit me taken? see the 14. chap of 〈…〉 3. E. 1.6. and the 10. and 2●. pages of my plea to Mr. Martin.  
My last question is this, whether in case the Lords have no legal jurisdiction over me, wheth●● 〈◊〉 not are not all those Gaolers and keepers of prisons, etc. that have executed their illegal orders, decrees, and commands upon me, liable by the law of England to make me reparations therefore? In the case of the Marshall●es, in the 10. part of Cook's reports.  
And now Sir, seeing the Committee hath not fulfilled the order of the house, in giving their opinions of the cause, and yet intent to report it, by which means I have lost and am deprived of the chiefest good I expected from the Committee, and may be at ten times a greater loss in the Ho●●● so rawly it come to be reported, wherefore if you be a true English man, and a man of justice and ●●●nour, I earnestly and pressingly desire your just assistance, that I may have a special day assign●●● 〈◊〉 the Committee once again to sit, and that seeing by divers of your house, the opinions of the Lawyers is judged so essential to the determination of the business, I earnestly desire your just assistant for aspeciall order from your house, that 10. or 20. of them may attend that day. And in regard Mr. Maynard to whom by your house the especial care of the business is committed, is so extraordinary full of business being tear me time, that it may be he cannot conveniently be there, nor it may be spe●● so much time as a full and legal debate, pro andcon will require, than I earnestly desire, that seeing all the members of the house are of that Committee, that the Mayor number present, 〈◊〉 appo●●● new Chairman, fully to debate and argue the business openly and freely and positively draw up the results, opinions, and sense of the Committee upon the ●hole business, and if your house thi●●e 〈◊〉 I earnestly desire the Lords may have notice to send, if they please their Proctors, to defend if they 〈◊〉 their dealing with me, or if not this:  
Then secondly, I earnestly desire your assistance to procure of the house, a fixed day when Mr. Maynard shall make the report as it is, that so it may receive a full debate in a considerable full house and that if it be possible the house may be turned into a grand Committee, that so every man may fully speak his conscience and judgement, that so every man in the house may truly know the state of the business, that so neither the House of Lords, nor I may rashly or inconsiderately be condemned, by majority of voices, and if my cause singly laid in the impartial scale of justice and law, will not ●en● our itself, I crave not our hair's breadth of favour or mercy, only I earnestly desire that none of my writings occasioned by the Lords transcendent and almost unsupportable oppressions ●●●●●he, 〈◊〉 be thrown in, to hinder the validity, force or strength of that judgement I desire, till the final judgement of your house be past, and then I shall according to the rule of law and justice, answer the Lords or any else in England, that hath any thing to say to me therefore. And to conclude all, seeing the Apostle Paul saith, He is worse than an infidel, that doth not his utmost to provide for his family. And the Prophet jeremiah saith, They that be slaire with the Sword, are better than they that be slain with hunger for these pure away, stricken through for want of the fruits of the 〈◊〉. And seeing? I have s●a●●e been free one years together this 11. years from chargeable 〈…〉, and seeing I ha●●●●llowed this House now above 7. years for justice against my Star-Chamber judges to my extraordianry charges, and yet to this day have not obtained one farthing tokens worth 〈◊〉 ●●●ctive justice all which truly said together be good earnest, renders any gallant death in the wor●● 〈◊〉 it ●ome 〈◊〉 from my ●e●●e) more acceptable unto me th●● a continuance in my unjust, unsupportable and 〈◊〉 imprisonment, it being too perfect a b●d● of slavery for a heroic-●●spirit●●●●●●y to amain 〈◊〉 therefore if there be my 〈◊〉 of compassion in you, or any spark of 〈…〉 ●●●cience, I most came 〈◊〉, and most pressingly entreat your active assistance 〈◊〉 speedy per●●d of ●y business before you, either to my justification it innocent, or condemnation illegally guilty, a●● that I may not be kept in person in a ●●●●●ing condition, but may immediately be 〈◊〉 ●ith 〈◊〉 an allowance for my sub●●●t●nce as is my right and 〈◊〉, both by the law of England, and the customed the Power. Or else that 〈◊〉 will take speedy 〈◊〉 th●● I may receive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉tions from my Star-chamber judges, (which 〈◊〉 laid at your 〈◊〉 2. years, and 〈…〉 your House to hel●● me to (if they please) as for me to come to Westminster to desire it of yo●● that so I may have some thing of my own to keep me alive, and my wife and little children, 〈…〉 I rest your true friend in the faithful discharge of your duty to the kingdom.  
john Lilburne. From 〈…〉 and most 〈…〉 in the Tower of London this 8 No. 1647.