A LIE is no SCANDAL.  
Or a VINDICATION OF Mr. MUNGO CRAIG, From a Ridiculous Calumny cast upon him by T. A. who was Executed for APOSTASY At Edinburgh, the 8 of January, 1697.  Ps. 26. v. 6. 
I will wash mine hands in Innocency so will I compass thine Altar O Lord.  Ps. 31. v. 18. 
Let the lying Lips be put to Silence: Which speak grievous things proudly and Contemptuously against the Righteous.  Plaut: in Amphit. 
— Qui non deliquit decet  
Audacem esse, & considenter prose & proterve loqui Nam  Horat. Epod. 6. 
— Si quis atro dente me petiverit,  
inultus ut Flebo Puer?  
Written, January 15, MDCXCVII.   

A VINDICATION, Of Mr. MUNGO CRAIG, from a Ridiculous Calumny cast upon him by T. A. lately Executed for Apostasy.  

Section I. Containing the Introduction, the Calumny, and some General Observations.  
ALthough there be no Divine Truth which concerns our Eternal Felicity, more demonstratively deducible from the Axioms of sound Reason, more clearly holden forth in Scripture, or better countenanced by the experience of all Ages; than the being of a Providence, whereby every thing falls out according to the eternal purpose of him that worketh all things according to the Counsel of his own will. Eph, 1.11. This being the necessary result of his Glorious perfections, with respect to his end in Creating of the World. yet, there is no subject about which Men can employ their intellectual faculties wherein they will find their wit nonplused in a higher degree, than in the stupendious intricacies of this unfathomable depth; whose beauty and harmony, we can no more unridle in particular instances, than we can grasp the infinite understanding and free-willed Counsels of God, by the narrow limits of our shallow apprehensions. which made the Holy Apostle exclaim in the two, of the Rom. & 38. v. O the deep of the Riches both of the Wisdom and Knowledge of God How unsearchable are his Judgements and his ways past finding out. Now, as the truth of both these positions, is abundantly perspicuous to any who is not altogether a stranger to the things of God: So, (considering the fewness of my days and shortness of my experience) it is evident to me in an eminent degree. The Lord having dealt with me in such a manner, as I have often seen the thick Clouds of apparent ruin dispelled in a moment, and issue in my real Good. And upon the other hand, when my Spirits have been dejected, for the disappointment of mine expectations, in that which I imagined would be conducible to my well-being; a few days persuaded me of the falsity of my Judgement, when I perceived that it would have terminated in my hurt either one way or other. And truly I cannot but say except I give my Conscience the lie, that ever since I could make any considerable use of Reflection and Memory; I have observed the Finger of God in every step of my Life. So that I have learned to wait with patience, on his meaning in any Emergency of his over ruling Power for the Future, hoping through his Grace to be found among these; whom he loveth and chasteneth, and that when he hath tried me I shall come forth as Gold, Job. 23, i0. But here, I must confess that the present and humbling dispensation wherewith the Lord has been pleased to try me, for ends best known to his Holy Majesty, is so odd, by reason of a strangely surprising and ridiculous calumny cast upon me by that poor Creature lately Executed for Apostasy; that I am totally puzzled how to behave under it but, Let me not be ashamed O Lord for I have called upon thee: Let the wicked be ashamed and let them be silent in the Grave, psal, 3i, i7. I say it is strangely surprising, first because, (as I call the searcher of hearts to witness) it came to my ear as unexpectedly, as if I had seen the orderly Course of Nature; which God hath established in the Universe, turned in a moment to Confusion. 2ly. Because it came from one who was to die, and pretended to reced from his former Principles. But more of this afterwards. 3ly. Because it has had reception among some who are real Christians, but biased by Misinformation. Nevertheless, upon reflex thoughts my Admiration Ceased as to the two first points, when I considered the qualities of my Accuser and had Read his Speech. And likewise as to the third, when I considered that it was only among such as were unacquainted with me that it had reception; and that it is disseminated and fomented only by a Graceless crew of profligat Persons, who cannot endure to see vice crubed without wheting their malicious Tougues on such as appear against it. I call it ridiculous and false, because I'll shortly prove that it is so. And although I be persuaded, both from my own experience, and from the method of the Lords Dispensations toward his People in the whole Canon of the Scripture, that it will terminate in my Advantage; yet seeing that it is a public Scandal to that Holy calling; whereunto out of his abundant Grace and Mercy, he hath been pleased to call me. Having an Eye solely to the Glory of God, and that I may not be a Stumbling Block to any weak Conscience; I have thought it not only convenient, but my indispensible duty to give a public Testimony in my Vindication against it. For the regular performing of which, I shall first lay down his own words for a principal Copy of his Speech. And 2ly, I shall prove them to be false. And lastly Answer some Calumnies that are commonly rumoured, whereof he makes no mention in his last Declaration. The words are those,  
AND I CANNOT WITHOUT DOING MYSELF A MANIFEST INJURY, BUT VINDICAT MY INNOCENCY FROM THESE ABOMINABLE ASPERSIONS, IN A PRINTED SATYR OF Mr. M. C's WHO WAS AN EVIDENCE AGAINST ME WHOM I LEAVE TO RECKON WITH GOD AND HIS OWN CONSCIENCE IF HE WAS NOT AS DEEP  ENGAGED IN THESE HELLISH NOTIONS AS EVER 1 WAS.  
Before I descend to the particular Anatomy of his Accusation, I must make two General Observations, how the wonderful providence of God had over ruled his Malice in making his Calumny carry its own Refutation in the forehead of it. My first General Observation is. That one parr of the words is a manifest and undeniable contradiction of the other, for first he says, that he is innocent from these abominable Aspersions which I lay to his Charge; and yet he leaves me to reckon with God and my Conscience, if I was not as deeply engaged in them as he. Now, if he stand to the first that he is innocent, that I'm not guilty as the parallel which he runs betwixt our engagements clearly demonstrats, and so the last part of the Calumny falls to the ground. And if he stand to the second, that I am guilty, than he is not Innocent, and consequently the former clause must be false. Now, although I shall prove both the Clauses of the Calumny to be false, yet it's clear that according to himself one of them must of necessity be so. This being as Logicians term it Argumentatio ad hominem. Where I must extol the goodness of God, in that when the wicked even mine Enemies and my Foes came upon me to eat up my Flesh, they stumbled and fell Psal. 27, 2. My second general Obse vation is, that he doth not positively affect that I was as deeply engaged as he but leaves me to reckon with God and my Conscience i● I was not so. As if he had said, I have a Suspicion For th● (a) that Mr. M. Craig was once so as I am, however, ground o● be it so or not, I leave it to God and his conscience, this suspicr● if they clear him I clear him. To which I sub- on see Sect some but they have sufficiently cleared me, and 3. Cons. 8. will clear me in the day of general Judgement, be fore Men and Angels, Ergo (according to the most Genuine sense that his words can admit of, considered with their Circumstances) I am sufficiently cleared. And although this Phrase may be admitted for an affirmation in more trivial affairs, where there is no ground of Jealousy, that the Person speaking is either capable or willing to Sophisticate yet, it is not so to be let pass if we consider Thomas Aitkinhead'● dexterity in that Art. Especially, seeing that from the sequel of my discourse (b.) I shall make it apparent, that he had a design to put a blur upon the World in't ei-Sect. 3. ●ther through malice or mistake. And now I appeal Con. 8. to any competent and unprejudiced Person, if ever two propositions were more repugnant, or if ever the oracles of the Heathen Daemons were more equivocal. But admitting all which I have observed to be null, yet I shall prove both the parts of his Calumny to be false in the two following Sections.   

SECTION II. In which the first part of the Calumny is demonstrated to be false.  
HIs position here is, that I did cast abominable aspersions on him in my Satire of which he was innocent● I contradict it thus, I laid nothing to his Charge in that Satire, of which he was not guilty. That I may prove my Assertion, observe 1, that all that I mention of him in that Pamphlet, may be divided into two parts 1, a relation of some ridiculous and airy Fancies in Philosophy and Chimestry, reduced into five heads. 1 Of the Chimaerical virtues or properties which he attributed to his Aurum potabil● as he termed It. 2 Of his design of inventing a way to keep Commerce betwixt the Terestial Glob, and the World which he imagined to be in the Moon. 3 Of his new and extraordinary Way of making the Philosopher Stone. 4 Of his rediculing the received and self evident principles of Reason. 5. Of the Extravagant and Blasphemous power Which he attributed to Man's Imagination. That all these and many other Wild Effects of unbridled and daring Ignorance, Were his common discourse, almost every one who had any acquaintance of him can Testify: I shall Instance some, viz. Mr Patrick Midleton Mr. Adam Mitchel Mr. Hugh Cravefaord Mr John Neilson etc. Moreover, that about Imagination was an Arucle of his Lybel and sufficiently proven against him. The second part, is a general Information of his Extravagancies in Divinity, without so much as naming any thing in particular; because I looked upon it as little less than Blasphemy to name them again, when not called thereunto, and that the Epithe s whereby I designed them there, were very congruous to the things libeled against him, non that ever heard his Lybel can deny. Now, that he was guilty of these, I have no more to say, but that (after a due and punctual process of Law, whereby every thing contained in his Lybel was sufficiently proven, together with several Articles which were not libeled, by Witnesses who heard them in different places, and at several occasions, uttered by him, in the Spirit of Malice and Bitterness, with frequent Repetitions, without any Provocation, yea, contrary to the found Admonitions of those, who, with abhorence, were his Auditors.) he was Capitally punished for them.  
Observe, 2ly. That it is to his Extravagancies in Divinity, that his Words have more special Reference, which I Collect from the two Epithets he gives them; viz. Abominable and Hellish, and likewise from the strain of his Speech, Where he endeavours to lenify his Gild, by attributing it to a love of Truth inherent in his Nature; though non that ever heard him on these points could perceive that it flowed from such a Principle. And really I cannot see, how cursing and railing against Holy and tremenduous mysteries, Which Man's Wit cannot Comprehend, can consist with love of Truth, or how a high Conceit of a Man's own Wit above all others, and a rejecting of all Instructions th●● could be given him, as if he were above the possibility 〈◊〉 having further Light in the knowledge of things, can cous●●● With the Character of a Philalaethes', And yet both these in the highest degree were his Properties.  
Observe, 3ly. That (as we may Collect from the former observation) this doth not only Reflect upon me, b●● likewise upon the rest of the Witnesses, who Testified th●● he was guilty of such abominable and Hellish Notions. Ye● and upon the Wise and Grave Judges too, as if they either had given ear to Calumnies, or, admittted incompetent Witnesses against him; Whereas, never was a Process mo●● punctual, never a more unanimous consent of Witnesses, who heard them at different occasions as we said before, yea, of a great number of Witnesses Who Were called together, many were strangers one to another.  
Observe, 4ly. That this Contradicts the former part o● the speech, in which he declares, that since 10 or 11 Years o● Age, he was guilty of this Apostasy for which he suffered These things being premised, I make the falsehood of hi● position apparent thus; either his position or mine must b● false, the one being the contradiction of the other. But that mine is not false, is evident from the former Observations. Ergo. His is false which was to be demonstrated. And this in the opinion of any judicious Person, is sufficient to debilitat the Credit of the other part of his Calumny. For how is it to be thought, that a Man would stop to ly● in so private a Business as my Reputation, who had the impudence, to call these things abominable Aspersions or Calumnies, that were so generally known of him, and legally proven against him, I might here take notice, that he promises to vindicat his Innocence from these things, and yet does it not, for he says not a word more upon that point. And if by Vindication he mean only the bare asserting of hi● Innocence, (which indeed is a Notion of vindication not a white stranger than the Person that spoke it) then by the same Rule, the bare asserting of my Innocence from what he lays to my Charge, would be (by a Thousand times) a more valid Vindication of me, because such a thing could never be laid to my Charge by any Man.   

SECTION III. Wherein the second part of the Calumny is demonstrated to be false  
THere is one previous consideration I would offer to the Reader, before I proceed to this point. viz, That in proving the falsity of the other Clause, I had a great advantage that I lake here, my proper station in that being to Oppugn, but here the scene is changed, my Office properly being to defend myself from any thing that he had to lay to my Charge, and his to prove it. But by his bare asserting of the thing & that but seemingly too 
(a) Sect 1. Observe, 2.  without giving particular Instances, I am deprived of many eminent Topics, from which I might have made his malice demonstratively evident to the World. Notwithstanding, in the strength of the Lord, I shall lay down such grounds for the contrary of his Assertion, taken in the strictest sense that can be put upon it, that though every one of them in itself considered will not be a Demonstration, yet, we may draw a conclusion from them collectively considered, not inferior to any evidence that a thing of that nature can admit of; which may serve for an Example that a Holy and Wise God will never leave oppressed innocence without a sufficient ground of Vindication. Then.  
Consider. 1 That I am neither a Stranger come from America not any other remote place, but had both my Birth and Education in, and about the City of Edinburgh, and has had Converse with People of several Ranks and Qualities, and I give a public defiance to any one, or all of my Acquaintances, if ever I spoke or Acted any thing, that tended that way either directly or indirectly. Yea, I Magnify the Lord for it, that my Life and Conversation has been so void of Offence before God and Man. (I speak not here of those Infirmities which are the inseparable adjuncts of corrupt humane Nature; but of gross Enormities in Principles or practices) that the Rumour of this, was as Astonishing to any that had particular acquaintance of me, as to myself, and is very far from having the least Degree of their Credit.  
Consider 2ly, That this Clause is both Ridiculous and Impossible. For I'm confident, that no Intelligent Person who over heard his Lybel can deny, that it is Ridiculous to suppose any Rational Soul guilty of such Horrid and Presumptuous Blaspheniy; that is not either wholly debauched with grols immorality, or drowned and misted with self conceited Ignorance: And I defy any man to lay these to my Charge And Ah Christians! who gives Ear to this groundless Calumny, what for a Monster conceive ye me to be were I guilty of any such thing In painting out that Sin in such black and dismal Colours, as I did in that satire, in de●e●●cing son●a●y woe' against the guilty, and in Attribution to them such He ●●ish properties. Can it enter into your mind's 〈◊〉 a Man could ever screw up his Soul to such a height of Hypocrisy, and shake from him so far the awe and d●●●d of a Supreme being? As for my part I'm persuaded that if it be not simply impossible 'tis the greatest trouble i● the World, for men or these Principles to play the Hypocri●●● And now (whatever Misconstructions some may put upon it) I call God to Witness, that out of sincere love to the everlasting Gospel, and disdain to that mystery of Iniquity, I threw in that Mire of Mine to the public Treasury. Neither does any thing there delivered express the Thousand Degree of that Detestation which my Soul conceives against that Hellish abomination. Do not I hate them. O Lord that here Thee: And am not I grieved with those that rif● up against Thee? Ps. 139 v 21, I hate them with a perfect hatred: I count them mine Enemies. But mistake me not, as if I endeavoutred from this, either to clear myself, or to Extort your assent to my Innocence. But I observe it only by the By as an an instance of Probability. I say also, that 'tis impossible, because, although I had erred in my Judgement as to the Matters of Religion (as God forbidden tha● either I had or should do it) yet I could not be so guity a● he; in that I neither Railed against nor Scandalised the Sublime and Sacred truths of Cristianity, as he did.  
Consider 3ly. that I was an avowed Oppugner of him, & endeavoured diligently to extricat him from those Souldestroying Principles of which he was possessed. As Mr. Patrick Midl, top, Richard Comely, and several others can Testify upon Oath.  
Consider 4ly. That it was but small and short acquaintance I had of him, as to particulars, being only from Feb. 1696; till April tha● sam● year. And a●oon as I had discovered, th● Latent treasure of Corruption which was within him, and had perceived, that all ordinary means of Recovery proved ineffectual; I wholly abandoned his Company, and sep●●●●ed from him only upon that Account. As is well known to the most part of my Acquaintances. From which date of April till he was Apprehended, I never saw him but twice or thrice.  
Consider 5ly, that it was not I alone, that T. A. Not only. without all ground, but against all Reason; Slandered as guilty of his horrid Extravagancies. For I can prove that he was so Bewitched with his Hellish Delusions, that he ordinarily said; that all knowing Men were so, whatever they said to the contrary, And Mr. Patrick Midlton Mr. John Neil●on and I can declare, that he boasted how he had prosolytized to his Apostasy a certain Minister of the Gospel. How ridiculous this is let any man Judge.  
Consider 6ly the qualities of my Accuser, we are certain and it was legally proven against him, that he was an Apostate from the Faith, a Blasphemer of God, and a contemner of the Sacred & ●rem●nduous Mysteries of our Holy Religion. And the Spirit of God makes us Infallibly certain, 
(3) 2 Tim 3. v, 3.  that such should be false Acensers (i●) and as we are certain of this, so we are uncertain whither he had the very first Decrees of solid Repentance. The Lord forbidden that I should take upon me the Incommunicable attributes of God, and prentend to be a searcher of Hearts. But I say, we are very uncertain of it, if we consider 1 That he gave but little satisfaction to though Pious and Reverend Ministers, who Labouted Industriously to Reclaim him. 2ly. His last Speech is very unbecoming, a dying Man in his Circumstances, being so far Stuffed with the Affectation of a Bombast and Airy S●●le, which he was not able to Manage; that he run himself inevitably to writ● what no Man can make sauce of, where we are entertained with much of Extravagant and Illogical Reesoning, in order to self Justification; but with nothing that Savours like a Soul Touched. with a Sense of such nefarious Blasphemy as he was guilty of. For the danger of such a Case, see Heb; 6; v, 4, 5 & 6. And the 10 Chap, of that Epistle, and v, 26 29.  
Consider. 7ly. The motives he had to Incense him against ●e, 1 be entertained a suspicion, that I was the first that discovered him to the Civil Magistrate; which although it was not true, yet seeing he firmly believed it; it could not but have great influence, to prompt a man of his Principles to Revenge. 2ly, I had made his name public in that Satire. 3ly He knew very well, that I would prove an impartial Witness against him; now I can prove that he said that his only Refuge lay in framing Objections, that might Incapacitat his Witnesses to give evidence against him. And because he could lay nothing to my Charge; he endeavoured by this device, either to have my evidence rejected or at least to put a stain upon my Name. But the hope of the wicked shall Perish.  
Consider 8ly. That he could move no objection against me before the Lords of Justiciary, that was of Force to incapacitat me to bear Witness against him; for 'tis beyond all controversy, that if he could but have raised a Suspicion, in their Lordships that I was such a Person; my evidence had been rejected. It being simply impossible to bind a man, to declare the verity upon an Oath, whose Tenor, in his judgement, was not Obligatory. These things being duly considered, and counterpoised with the Calumny; in the Balance of a sound and impartial Judgement; the Slander will be found to have no proportion to my Counter Reasons. But, for the more perspicuity, I shall Rank up the degrees of its improbability, in the following Epiromy.  
An Apostate from from the Faith 
a Sect. 3. Con. 6.  to whom faise Accusation is an effential Property 
b. 2. Tim. 3.3.  of whose solid Repentance we are very uncertain; 
c. Sect. 3. Con. 6.  from a habit of Slandering and Jealousy 
d. Con. 5  hath Ambiguously 
e. Sect. 1. Obs. 2  and Contradictoriously, 
f. Obs. 1.  either out of the Spirit of Malice and Revenge 
g. Sect. 3. Con. 7.  or from mistake: 
h. Prop. 4.  Slandered one, who is not only of an unblamished Reputation, 
i. Con. 1.  and given proof of his dislike to these horrid Abominations, 
k. Co. 2.  but likewise endeavoured to reduce him, 
l. Co. 3●.  and because he could not prevail, sepetated from him. 
m. C. 4.  Yea one, against whom he could bring no relevant Objection, when his very Life, in a manner, depended upon the the moving of it. 
n. C. 8.   
What degree of Credit such a Report should receive, let every one judge pro●arbitrio: Now me thinks, none can rationally deny, that his Calumny deserves no inconsiderable Station among improbabilityes of the first magnitud. But that we may not rest here, I shall likewise demonstrate; that it is de facto False. And that I may be methodical, I'll first lay down two observations. 2ly. I'll propose and prove some propositions, in order to draw my Conclusion. My first Observation is his behaviour toward me, before the Lords of Justiciary; when I was called to Witness against him. viz. When their Lordships enquired if he had any thing to object against me; he answered, that I should have said to him, before one of the Witnesses then present: that Dr. More was the first that convinced me of the truth of Christianity. There Lordship, Replied that it was no Objection in Law, and that I might bless God for my Conversion: But the the thing as he expressed it, being Notoriously false, I desired Permission to speak for myself but their Lordships thought it not necessary, because the Objection was of no Consequence. Their Lordships enquired, if he had any more to say, he alleged that I had Malice against him, because I had mentioned his Name in that Pamphlet. from which I was cleared by Oath. It being further enquired, if he had any more to Object against me; he answered, NO. My second Observation is, a Succinct and real Narrative of the passage, on which he builded, his first and main Objection. And it is this. when Mr, Patrick Midleton and I went to see how he behaved in Prison, we found upon the Table, Sir Charles Wolsley's Discourse on the reasonableness of Scripture Belief. On which I took occasion to ask, what satisfaction it had given him as to his doubts. But when by his constrained and ambiguous Answer. I understood that his satsfaction was little or none, I (having read the Book about two Years before.) Magnified it for the most accomplished discourse that ever I saw on that Subject. and to enforce the Doctrine there delivered, home upon him (if the Influence of such a slender Authority as mine, might have prevailed any thing with him) I said, that it had so great force upon my Judgement, that though I had doubted never so Sceptically upon that point, (as I bless God, said I, 'twas ne'er my Temptation.) Yet, I could not have any longer denied my Assent to the Verity and Divine Authority of the Sacred Scriptures, I further added, that More, Crotius and others has laid down such solid reasons, for proving the Theory of the Christian Religion, that no rational Soul that ever was at the Pains to weigh them duly, can miss to be a Speculative Christian. For, we must understand, that soli● Grace and justifying Faith, (which are the necessary requisits of a real Christian.) being supernatural Donatives can neither be acquired by us, this or any other way. But they are the Gifts of God, infused into us and bestowed upon u● from above; solely upon the score of the infinite Merits of Jesus Christ. From which Observations the Truth of these following propositions is abundantly perspicuous; upon which account, we shall be the breifer in their Illustrations.  
Proposition 1. He could say nothing to my Charge, but what he la●● to it before the Justiciary Court. This is clear from his Answer to their Lordship's last query, which was that he had no more to Object against me: Compared with the 7 consideration of this Section.  
Prop▪ II. That even by his own Expression I, was froced from guil●. This is apparent from their Lordship's Answer to his first and main Objection.  
prop. III. What he said before the Lords of Justiciary, was wholly grounded on that passage related in the 2. Observation. The truth of this appear●, from comparing of the two Observations together. But, 'tis put beyond all doubt, by his referring it to one of the Witnesses then present for there was not a Witness then present, that ever was with me and him together; except Mr Midleton and another. Th' other can declare that he never heard us speak any thing about Religion. And Mr. Midleton can depone thet he never heard me use any discourse to that purpose but then.  
Prop. IU. He wildly wrested my words to a quite different sense, This is evident from the Comparison of the two Observations And from it we have this natural and undeniable Corrolary. That wh●● he said before the Lord of Justiciary, wa● either a LIE ●●t of a design to frame something like ●h Objection, and slain my Reputation; gr●●●ted 〈◊〉 self-defence and Revenge, Or at least a MISTAKE. Which might 〈◊〉 occasioned from his habitual use of wresting men's words▪ or from ●i● inadvertency when I spoke, for truly, he never much relish 〈◊〉 discourses of that nature.  
Pro. V. What he says here, is either the same with what he said before the Lords of Juistciary. or a LIE. This proposition is a plain Corrolatly of the first, for, seeing he had nothing to say but what he said then this must either be the same or a Lie; seeing I never saw 〈◊〉 nor spoke to him since. Moreover the particle WAS, is the same with what he said before the Lords of Justiciary, viz. That 〈◊〉 was convinced. And the Ambiguous Phrase which hens●●, (the Circumstances duly considered) denots that he had either a design to Cheat the World by Sophestry; or at least that he was not positive in what he said. Hence I draw the following Conclusion  
If what he lays to my Charge, be either a LIE or a MISTAKE, th●● I'm free, But it is some of there two. Ergo etc. The Major Proposition, is incontraver●ible. And I prove the Minor thus; if what he said before the Lords of Jasticiary was either a LIE or a MISTAKE And of thisbe either the same, or as ill; Then, this is LYE or a MISTAKE▪ 〈…〉 he said before the Lord of Justiciary, was either a LIE 〈◊〉 a MISTAKE; A●d what he says, here is ei●●● the s●●●●r ●ill. Ergo-what he says 〈◊〉 is either a LIE or a MISTAKE. Q. E. D.  
The Connexion of the Major proposition, is founded upon that Axiom qua e●dam sa●●um tettio, san● 〈◊〉 int●r se. The first part of ●inor is grounded on the Co●olary to the 4 proposition; and the last part of it on ch● 9 proposition. Now M● thinks that I perform●● what I promised, in proving the Calumay, not only highty improbable 〈◊〉 likewise, de facto false.   

SECT iv Containing the Conclusion.  
Having constricted myself, to such narrow Limits; in R●●●ting What T. A. really said's it would be both a Foolish and Impossible ●●terprise to endeavour to answer every frivolous Calumny of lying Fame. When one lover of Sla●●●●, may b●●rch more Lies in an ●our; than all the World can refute in 〈◊〉 Age. Wherefore, I ●h●ll ●e 〈◊〉 brief and General in this part as I can. Some say that I was the first who Inffilled these principles in hin●. Others asseit that I le●t him Athiestical Books, with in numerable such frivolous stories. The first of these he refutes in his Speech, where he Declares that since 10 or 11 years of age he was or these Principles Whereas I never saw him so much as by the Face till he was 17. And had not the opportunity to discover his corrupt qualities till about the end of March 1696. And as for the other objection or any such like, I answer that if any can prove them legally against me; I am willing, to suffer condign punishment for them. To which I add that if ever I made Athiestical Book either my own Study, or lent them to others. If ever I was instrumental in perverting any, from the Christian Faith If ever I entertained a dislike to the same, or if ever I knew any that were of Athiestical and irreligious principies, except T. A. then let the Almighty power down upon me all the furious darts of his Fiery Indignation both Temporal and Eternal. And would to God, that I were as certain of a Saving Faith to lay hold upon the merits of my Saviour; as I am and ever was persuaded, of the truth of the Christian Reformed Religion as it's holden forth in the Holy Scriptures. From on jot of which, before I receded (if the Lord would afford me Strength equal to the Absolute determination of my Mind.) I would willingly endure any Misery, that can be inflicted on Body and Soul; except a Total separation from the Glorious presence of God; which is so inseparably connected with the great end of our Creation and Aticles of the Covenant of Grace, that none can chufe the one and reject the other. And what God hath joined let no man put Aslunder.  
But it may be Objected. Is it not a strange thing, that a man should go to Death with such a Lie in his Mouth? I Answer that it would be a stranger thing, if a groundless Surmise upon the bare words of such a Person as he was should be of Force to invalidat clear evidence; backed with the Execrations and Protestations of one, who can defy the World to lay any Scandalous Enormity to his Charge. Moreover, I could clearly evince that this is not the only Lie in his last Speech, but seeing I love to hector no man especially the Dead; except where Necessity impels me to it I forbear it. desiring Earnestly that Christians would Judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to Light, the hidden things of Darkness, and will manifest the Counsels of the Hearts: And then shall every man have praise of God. 1 Cor. 4 & 5. Now, be Merciful to me O God for Man would swallow me up, etc. Psal, 56, v. 1. Every day they Wrist my words: All their thoughts are against me for evil. v. 5 But in God have I put my Trust: I will not be afraid what man can do unto me, v. 1 1.— Thou hast dellivered my Soul from death Wilt not thou deliver my Feet from falling? that I may walk before God in the Light of the Living.   
MUNGO CRAIG. January the 15. 1697.