A NEW TEST OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND'S LOYALTY.  
WITH ALLOWANCE.  
LONDON Printed in the Year M. D.C.LXXXVII.   

A New Test of the Church of ENGLAND's Loyalty.  
I Have often considered, but could never yet find a convincing Reason, why that part of the Nation,( which is commonly called the Church of England) should dare appropriate to themselves alone the Principles of true Loyalty, and that no other Church or Communion on Earth can be consistent with Monarchy, or indeed with any Government.  
This is a Presumption of so high a nature, that it renders the Church of England a despicable Enemy to the rest of Mankind: For what can be more ridiculous than to say, that a Congregation of People, calling themselves a Church, which cannot pretend to an Infallibility even in matters of Faith, having since their first Institution, made several fundamental changes of Religious Worship, should, however assume to themselves an Inerrability in point of Civil Obebience to the Temporal Magistrate? Or what can be more injurious, than to aver, that no other Sect or Community on Earrh from the rising to the setting Sun, can be capable of this singular Gift of Loyalty? So that the Church of England alone( if you have Faith enough to believe her own Testimony) is that Beautiful Spouse of Christ, Holy in her Doctrine, and Infallible in her Duty to the supreme Magistrate, whom( by a Revelation peculiar to her self) she owns both for her Temporal and Spiritual Head. But I doubt much whether her ipsa dixit alone will pass currant with all the Nations of the Universe, without making further search into the veracity of this bold Assertion.  
We will allow them, however( and that's the onely thing in my Opinion, they can value themselves upon) that most of the Members of this Communion have been faithful and serviceable to King Charles I. during the unhappy Commotions in his Reign: But they must allow us on the other hand, that it was the Ambition of that Church to force an universal Uniformity to her liturgy and Discipline, occasioned that War; and the good King both lost his Life and Crown in the Attempt. And I pray what Work of Super-errogation is it in them, not to have joined with the common Enemy to cut their own Throats? Or to have done that which the Law of Nature dictates to every individual in his own defence? he case of the Romanists in those days, was quiter different from theirs, for they freely exposed theit Lives and Fortunes in the Kings Service, without any regard or prospect of self-interest: For whether his Majesty lost or won, they expected no benefit by the change. They were to hope for no quarter from the Rebels( for it was never known that any of their Communion served that Party;) and on the other side the King himself seemed to disown them in all Treaties with the Parliament, and banished them at last both from his Court and Army, to comply with the importunities of his own Protestant Party, who would needs have it so. It is much doubted whether those of the Church of England, had they met with Recompenses of this kind, would have been half so forward to serve a Prince, who instead of cherishing and rewarding, should reject and banish them; though they take never so much pains now to persuade the World, that Loyalty is of the Essence of their Religion. Let us but examine the carriage and behaviour of this Church, both in her Infancy, and now in her Old Age, and we shall easily perceive the vast difference between the Loyalty of her Members to catholic Princes, and the Fidelity of catholics to Protestant Kings.  
She began her Infancy under Edward VI. an Infant King, when that famous Confession of Faith was compiled in 39 Articles. No sooner was Edward called away, but she endeavoured with all her might and power to set up a Brat of her own to posses the Crown, and to exclude Queen Mary the only Legitimate Child of Henry VIII. because she was a catholic. After Queen Maries Death, Elizabeth, a known Bastard, raised this ascetic Ptotestancy called the Church of England, as a prop to support the weakness of her Title: And they, no sooner found themselves re-established, than they enacted these bloody cannibal Laws( a sufficient Testimony of their Moderation and Tenderness) Hang, Draw, and Quarter the Priests of the living God, from whom they themselves pretend to derive their immediate Succession: Laws that have been, and are to to this day, abhorred and exclaimed against by all ●he Reformed Churches of Christendom. Imprisonment, Banishment, and Confiscation of Goods, were the moderate Church of England's Laws in favour of th● Laity, but severely executed in those days. And to crown the extraordinary Loyal●y of the Members of this Church, they barbarously murdered the undoubted Queen of Scotland, the Queen Dowager of France, and the lawful Heir of the Crown of England inhumanly denying her a Priest of her own Communion to assist her in the Agony of Death.  
The greatest Zealots of the Church of England will not I hope have the confidence to allege that this execrable Fact, and the first of the kind, was contrived and executed by Presbterians, Independents, Anabaptists: Our Records and Histories clearly make out, that the Members of that Church were the only Men who then voted in Parliament, who sate in Council, who were the Commissioners delegated to Try and Condemn Mary Queen of Scots, and the lawful Queen of England, whom they beheaded on a public Scaffold, to the scandal and reproach of Christianity: And this done without the least remorse or repentance, no Prelate, Peer, Judge, or Senator of that Communion having ever yet declared his resentment against this barbarous Act. Behold here an incomparable sort of Loyalty, to set up the Title of a Bastard, and Murder the Legitimate Heir. And some have affirmed in print that K Char. I. came to the same tragical end, for being too zealously devoted to a Church, which proved so cruel and treacherous to his Grand mother;& gave the first presedent of cutting off a crowned Head by the hands of a hangman.  
If therefore assisting Usurpers to invade the Crown, if Condemning and Executing the Lawful Prince, if persecuting their fellow Subjects with Death and Confiscation of Goods; and if standing out in opposition to their Sovereign, when he is of another Religion; if these I say, be sufficient Testimonies of Loyalty, we must own the Ch. of England to have been hitherto unparalleled in her Duty. But if this be not the true Test of Loyal Subjects, I doubt our Rock of Loyalty, will soon degenerate into a Rock of Scandal, of Disobedience and Rebellion: whereof we need no further Evidence than her present behaviour now in her Old Age, towards our Gracious Sovereign King JAMES II.  
His Sacred Majesty no sooner took Possession of the Throne, than He was Graciously pleased to make a most favourable Declaration in behalf of the Members of the Church of England, promising to maintain that Church as it was by Law Established: And this early Promise from a Prince, who was known to be always true to his Word, seemed to elevate their drooping Spirits, and dissipate those dismal Clouds of fearful Apprehensions, which their ill jealousy was apt enough to conceive of a Prince of the Roman Communion. So that it might be rationally expected from a People so Prudent and Loyal as these of the Church of England would pass for in the world, to do something on their part, that might express a grateful acknowledgement; which could be no less than the Repeal of the Sanguinary Penal Laws, and the late Impious Tests. The first being purposely Enacted to maintain the Usurpation of Queen Eliz. and the last being contrived designedly to Exclude the present King. But my Loyal Gentlemen have been hither to so far out of the right bias, that in lieu of taking off the Tests and Penal Laws,( which all People expected from them in point of Gratitude, and good Manners) they made a solemn Address to his Majesty, that none should be employed who were not capacitated by the said Laws and Tests to bear Office Civil and Military. That is to say in short, Your Majesty must have none either in your Army, or at Court about your person, but such as really believe,& will swear to it that you are an Idolater: for that's the plain English of the Test. Now let me ask any indifferent Man, what security can a Prince have who must keep none about him, but such Christians, that are fully convinced in their own judgement that He is a Pagan? If the same People made it Penal heretofore in the Reign of K. Charles II. to call the King a Papist or a heretic, upon a supposition that that True Protestant Subject could not be Faithful to the King, if he were suspected to be any way inclined to Popery or heresy; what security can they now give, that the same Protestants will de true to a Prince who is a declared Papist, and an Heathen to boot, by a new Article of Faith, which is of greater force and value than the 39 that went before.  
But( says the zealous Protestant of the Mother-Church) if you repeal the Test, you take away the Bulwark that defends the Ch. for if that were once demolished, the Enemy would rush in, and possess all: And it is a delicate innocent Church, that cannot he safe but in a fortified place. I must confess it is a great Argument of her Modesty, to own her self weak and unable to subsist without the support of Parliamentary Laws, to Hang, Draw, and Quarter her Opposers, and without a co-ercive Power too in her self to Fine and Excommunicate all Recusants and Nonconformists. Prayers, Fasting, Mortification of the Flesh, and other Austerities, are not, it seems, so proper means to remove the Fears and Jealousies of her render Conscience; she must make use of more powerful Engines for her own security. The Primitive Christians flourished under Persecution for the space of 300 years; and the catholics of these Kingdoms, have been almost continually suffering these 150 years past: If this new Protestant Church be from God, why should they despair of the same Providence, without being guarded by so many Acts of Parliament? Where is the assurance that the Apostolical Church( as they call themselves) should have in the assistance of the Holy Ghost, who is to continue with the true Church till the consummation of the World? And what is now become of this celebrated Loyalty to the Temporal Prince, which no People could have in so eminent a degree as those of the Church of England? It is very remarkable that the Roman catholics constantly adhered to King Charles I. when he disowned and rejected them; and that the Church of England Protestants, do not now trust King James II. when he gives them so many fresh assurances of his Royal Protection: Whereby the vast difference between the Loyalty of the one, and that of the other is clearly discerned.  
As for the Tests themselves, it is not my province to show the Absurdities of them in point of Doctrine. For my business is, to set forth in its own Colours the extraordinary Loyalty of These Men, who obstinately maintain a Test, contrived by the Faction to usher in the Bill of Exclusion: Though by the by, I must hold it a great folly, to say that Transubstantiation is not a probable Opinion at least considering the Number and Learning of those who maintain it, which is the best part of Christendom: And if it be a probable opinion, it must be a great temerity in any Man to swear there is no such thing. And seeing the Real presence of Christ's Body in the Eucharist, is confessed by the most Eminent Divines of the Reformation and by the greatest Prelates and most Famous Doctors of the Church of England, I should think that this new Tenet, which makes it Idolatry to adore the Divine Body of Christ( whether there be a Transubstantiation or not) must certainly savour more of a Mahometan than of Christian Doctrine. And it is much admired( even by some of her own Children,) that the Grave and Matron like Church of England, which valves her self so much for her Antiquity, should be over-fond of a new point of Faith lately broached by a famous Act of Infallibile English Parliament convened at Westminster, and Guided by the Holy Spirit of Shaftsbury. But I doubt there are some Parliaments in the World, which will not so easily admit this new Article into their Creed. Tho' the Church of England labours so much to maintain it, as a special Evidence of her singular Loyalty.  
So that upon the whole matter the Loyal Church of England must either change her old Principles of Loyalty, and take example by her catholic Neighbours how to behave her self towards a Prince who is not of her persuasion; or she must give his Majesty leave not to nourish a Snake in his own Bosom, but rather to withhraw his Royal protection, which was promised upon the account of her constant Fidelity: for it is an approved Axiom in Philosophy cessant causa tollitur effectus; and we have a common saying of our own, No longer Pipe no longer Dance And now let us leave the holy Mother Church at liberty to consult what new Measures of Loyalty she ought to take for her own dear Interest, and for ought I know it may be worth her serious consideration.   
FINIS.