THE Scripture-History OF THE SABBATH. By SAMUEL GRASCOME, A Presbyter of the Church of England. Rom. xuj. 17, 18. Now I beseech you, Brethren, mark them which cause Divisions and Offences, contrary to the Doctrine which ye have learned, and avoid them: For they that are such, serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own Belly; and by good Words, and fair Speeches, deceive the Hearts of the simplo. LONDON, Printed by W. Bowyer, for Geo. Strahan, at the Golden Ball, against the Royal Exchange in Cornhill, MDCC. THE EPISTLE TO THE READER. Christian Reader, THE sad Distractions, strange Variety of Opinions, and bitter Animosities amongst us, with other ill Effects thence arising, as every Man must be sensible of, so doubtless every good Man doth bewail. But if any Man, out of his Excess of Charity and Compassion, shall endeavour to heal these Breaches, if he do not use extraordinary Caution, he shall rather pour on Oil than Water; and instead of quenching the Fire, blow all into a flamme: For no sooner shall you touch the Sore, though with a Design to dress it, but they presently fall a kicking; and it is well if you do not make the Matter worse, instead of mending it. To inquire into the manifold Causes of this, would be too tedious; but I think this is apparently one, That Men are not content to differ in their Opinions as becomes Christians,( which in many Things they might do, without either Prejudice to Salvation, or dividing Communion, or Breach of Charity,) but for the most part they are apt to lay too great Stress and Weight upon their own private Opinions and Fancies. They will single out some particular Tenet, and that commonly an error; and with this they gather Parties, and distinguish themselves from all others; by this they are known, it must be the Mark or Name in the Forehead; they who have it, are God's People, and Saints; those who oppose it, are in the ready Road to Ruin; and if they will not come in to them, shall be damned to all Intents and Purposes. And if the Opinion be not in itself fitted for this purpose, they will, contrary to its Nature, force it to be so: For, as to the Millenary Opinion, how harmless might it be, if Men only made this, which one would think to be the natural Use of it, to watch over our Lives and Conversations, and prepare for Christ's Coming; to trim our Lamps, have our Oil in them, and be always ready for the Bridegroom: But when Men will undertake to make ready his Kingdom for him, be his Deputies till he come, and think nothing bad enough can be done to those who will not comply with their pretended Power and Designs, they become one of the most pestilent and dangerous Sects in the World. There is no doubt but that there are some Things which will justify a Division; otherwise, there could be no colourable Pretence for any Division at all: But that most of our Sects are founded upon unnecessary and unjustifiable Causes, I suppose most Men will aclowledge as to others, how tenacious soever they may be of their own particular Opinions; and perhaps some of them are better slighted than taken notice of, as being in their Nature not long-lived, but apt to die of themselves, if not revived by Opposition: And such, for some time, did I take to be the error of those called the Saturday-Sabbath-Men, till by Experience I found them greatly increase, and many sober, well-minded Persons lead away, or infected therewith. Charity to their Persons, and Hopes to rectify their Mistake, was the great Motive which prevailed on me to writ this little Tract; and I should think my Pains well bestowed, if I could be an Instrument to recover some of the Deceived; for as for the Deceivers, I despair of doing Good of them: An honest Mind is capable of Conviction; but those who have set up a Trade to deceive, have so interested themselves in Gain and Credit, as will rarely suffer them to condescend to so much Self-denial, as to comply with Truth that makes against them. Some perhaps will say that this Subject hath been wrote on before; and I would willingly know what Subject hath not been wrote on before: Many, indeed, have been very busy in this Matter; and some who have wrote with the greatest Confidence in Words, have shewed the greatest Weakness of Argument; and several I have scarce had Patience to red, as being, in my Apprehension, much fitter to confounded, than to satisfy any Man. Of all that have fell into my Hands, none seem to me written with greater Perspicuity, and Strength of Argument, than that Speech of Doctor Prideaux, then Master of the Chair in Oxon, afterwards Bishop of Worcester; and the Letter and Answer to Mr. Byfield, by our learned Brerewood: But they having not to do with Men who strictly insisted on the Day of the Jewish Sabbath, touched but lightly on that Argugument; and as new errors arise, or old ones are revived, so they must be wrote against afresh, with Arguments adapted to the Times, Persons, Matter, and Manner of Handling, which I have herein endeavoured; and if I have failed, it may stir up some abler Pen to do it better; and it will be some Satisfaction to me, if I should occasionally do some good that way, if none really in this. I know many Men in these Days relish nothing but what is learned, and therefore will expect that this small Treatise should be stuffed with a World of Authorities, and will wonder when they shall see not one Citation, except from holy Scripture; and yet perhaps I could have produced as many as some of those who will be most apt to find fault for want of them; but indeed, I have industriously avoided them, as not agreeable to my Design; for my Intention was not to writ to the Wise and Learned, but to the Weak and Mis-led; to such as have honest Hearts, but want distinguishing Heads; and discern not clearly the different Dispensations of God to Mankind, and the different Obligations thence ceasing or arising: And these poor Men unhappily have little regard for Fathers, or Councils, or the judgement of learned Authors; but are rather prejudiced against them, and yet at the same time have a great Veneration for the holy Scriptures; and therefore in this Case I thought it most proper to imitate St. Paul, who became all Things to all Men, that if possible he might gain some: And accordingly, I have dealt with them in their own Way, and managed their own Weapons; yet so as that I have not singled out any particular Persons, nor( that I know of) used any provoking Language; but have examined only the Cause itself, and endeavoured to set that in a true Light; and therefore, if I have not pleased them, I hope they will be sensible that I have no ill Will towards them. I know not whether we are fallen into a more scribbling or more censorious Age, wherein was never more Writing, and never less Encouragement: Almost every Man is forward to be in Print, and every Man is ready to damn it as soon as it peeps abroad; and I should be a very vain Man, if I should expect fairer Quarter than others. But if I have the good hap to disentangle some of those poor deluded Persons from their errors, for whose Good I designed this, I value not all the Censures of our superwise critics. I thank God, I am conscious to myself of my own Sincerity; and to the best of my Understanding, I have set down plain Truth, without Respect of Persons; and if my Pains be not worth Thanks, my good Will may deserve Pardon; who, if I have missed of my Aim, have yet endeavoured to do some Service; and am Yours in Christ Jesus, S. GRASCOME. THE Scripture-History OF THE SABBATH. CHAP. I. An Enquiry whether there was any fixed Weekly Sabbath before the Time of Moses. AS Man was created for the Glory of God, so greater and stronger Obligations cannot be, than those laid on him to be duly subservient to that End. His very Being, and every Moment's Continuance in that Being, the Supports and Comforts of his Being, himself and all he enjoys, flow all entirely from the Kindness, Goodness and Bounty of his Maker, without whom he not only could have nothing, but would even resolve into his first Nothing. But as if all this, which all the World beside cannot bestow, were not enough, he hath promised more, greater and better Things to those who diligently and faithfully seek and serve him; even the raising again and glorifying their frail Bodies, the perpetuating their Being, the addition of such pure, full and uninterrupted Joys, as know no Mixture of Alloy, Sorrow, or Trouble; together with the Enjoyment of God himself, the most perfect Being; and all this to all Eternity. So that Man never so truly serves himself, and his own Interest, as in serving his God. If any Ingratitude could be so great, or strong, as to break through all these Obligations, yet one would think that even Folly itself would not; for did not we see it with our Eyes, did not Experience rise up beyond all Contradiction against Argument, certainly Reason would think itself imposed upon to believe that any Man could be so prodigious and inveterate an Enemy to himself, as from time to time perversely to reject all he could hope or wish for. But to cure Man of this desperate Malady, and at once to secure him both to his Duty, and his Happiness, God hath( as I may say) in Mercy denounced the Vengeance of Everlasting Fire, unspeakable and endless Torments, as the just Punishment of those, who by dishonouring their Maker, bid defiance to their own Bliss. For though no Punishment can be too severe for those who thus affront an Infinite and infinitely gracious God, and court their own Misery and Ruin; yet that God who delights not in the Death of a Sinner, hath ordained, and in ordaining hath forewarned us of this endless and intolerable State of the Damned; not that Men might fall into it, but that they might take care to avoid it; and in avoiding it, be happy. And when Life and Death, Eternal Happiness and Everlasting Misery, and an unavoidable Necessity of coming into one or other of these two States are set before a Man, one would think there should need little Consideration to determine his Choice, or any farther Motive to spur him to his Duty. Since therefore Man is under a Necessity to be dutiful to his God, if he would either arrive at Happiness, or escape Eternal Misery, the next Enquiry in course will be, How we may so serve him, that our Service may be acceptable to him? How we may so glorify him, as not to dishonour him? For when Men will be wise over-much, and prescribe to God, rather than accept Prescriptions from him; when they will calculate their Duties for their Humours, little Interests, Disgusts, Ambition, or the like, we see by woeful Experience that they have converted their very Religion into a nuisance, and made what they accounted their Duty to become their Sin. But to prevent this Mischief also, it hath pleased the alwise and Gracious God to reveal his Mind and Will in this matter so fully and clearly, that none need want sufficient Directions how to order themselves in every State, Condition and Relation of Life, and manage all the Actions of it to his Glory. But because it is not my Business at this time to run through so large a Field, I shall only instance in one thing, which God hath laid as a common Duty upon all; and that is, his public Worship. Therein we aclowledge him to be Sovereign Lord of Heaven and Earth, of all Mankind, and particularly of ourselves; and that we and all ought to live in Subjection and Obedience to him. In our Prayers, Praises and Thanksgivings we own to the World our entire dependence upon him, our absolute Submission to him, and that we receive all our good Things from him; and that to do this, is no less the Duty of others, than ourselves. In hearing of his holy Word, we do as it were confess in the Face of the World, that of him we ought to learn our Duty, and take his Revelations for our Rule. In participating of the holy Mysteries, we do profess our Faith and Incorporation into the Mystical Body of Christ, from whence we derive those Supplies and Benefits, which are not elsewhere to be expected. And these things God hath so required of us, that he interprets the Neglect thereof to be a being ashamed of him; yea, even a denying of him. Hence our Saviour tells us, Mark 8.38. Matth. 1●. 33. that those who are ashamed of him, or deny him before Men, he will be ashamed of them, and deny them before his Father which is in Heaven. Seeing we receive all from God, and owe all to him, the least, certainly, we can do is, freely and openly to aclowledge it; and yet, as little as this is, it is that whereby we most apparently give Glory to him, and set forth his Infinite Power and Goodness: So that could all our Time be thus spent in magnifying his great and glorious Name, it would be little in respect of what we owe to him. But such is the Nature of Man, especially since his Fall, that much of our Time is spent in quest of Supplies for our Necessities, much in discharge of our Duty towards others, or dispatching our Affairs with them: And therefore, that God( to whom we owe all) may not be robbed of his Share, it is necessary that such a certain Portion be set apart for his Service, that we fail not to make a due acknowledgement of his Sovereignty over us, and our Subjection to him. And if this be not done, and duly observed, such an Aversion to Divine Matters hath seized our corrupt Natures, that we shall be very apt from time to time to encroach more upon God's Share, till we have left him none at all, and so to live as without God in the World; from whence nothing can be expected but a Curse upon our present Blessings, and Eternal Damnation hereafter. But now, what proportion of Time it is which ought to be employed in this part of God's Service; and whether God for some time left it to the Discretion of Man, to try how liberal he would be to his God, who had given him all; or whether God did set out such a Portion of Time which he would have appropriated to his public Worship, not abridging Man from making a Free-Will Offering of what more he could spare; and what that Time is, and whether always the same proportion of Time, and whether altered or alterable, is a Question which( the more's the pity) some have brought into controversy; the Consideration of which I am now to enter upon. Those who would make the Jewish Sabbath of immutable Obligation, though they run upon an error which endangers no less than the Overthrow of the whole Christian Faith, yet they make a very specious Plea, and seem to lay the Foundation very deep, if the Ground were sound; but they build in a Quagmire, which slips from under them. They begin as low as the Creation, urging that Text of Moses, And on the Seventh Day God ended his Work which he had made, Gen. 2.2, 3. and he restend on the Seventh Day from all the Work which he had made; and God blessed the Seventh Day, and sanctified it, because that in it he had restend from all his Work which God created and made. Now by the Seventh Day in this place, is plainly meant the Seventh Day from the Creation; which in the Weekly Course was afterwards made the Jewish Sabbath, and is the same which we call Saturday. Nor do I see how this can be avoided, unless by flying to their Hypothesis who will not allow so much Time, but make short Work of the Creation. But as this is not to untie, but cut the Knot, so it would be to run into a scandalous Mischief, and unpardonable Crime: For this is not only to turn Moses into Fiction, but to make the Reason on which the Sabbath was founded to be false, and to give the direct lie to God himself, who so often urges the due Observation of the Sabbath on the Jews with this Reason, It is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God. Nor can they heal themselves by saying, That whenever God ceased from the Works of the Creation, it may properly be called a Sabbath, be the Time more or less: For it is not urged barely to prove or assert a Sabbath, or God's Resting from the Creation; but a Sabbath, one Day in Seven, and particularly that Day of the Seven. I shall therefore leave those Men to shift for themselves, and seek no Help from such as will be so wise as to know more, or better, than God has revealed; especially in those Matters which we can come to no certain Knowledge of, but by Revelation. Be it therefore freely granted, that by the Seventh Day is here meant that which in succeeding Times was the Jewish Sabbath, and is our Saturday: And then it will also be plain, that God did personally, and by himself, bless and sanctify that Day at that time, because he did then rest, and cease from the Works of the Creation. And if it could be farther proved that God did then so bless and sanctify the Sabbath, as to establish it for a Law to Adam in Paradise, that he and all his Posterity might observe it, it would go a great way to prove it obligatory upon all Mankind; and so obligatory, as not to be abrogated or altered, but by the same Power that established it. Before therefore I can proceed to trace the Sabbath through the whole Series of the Scriptures, it will be necessary to set this Text in a true Light; and it is so much the more necessary, because the misunderstanding it hath been a grievous Stumbling-block to many well-meaning Christians. The greatest part of this Text is so plain, that he that runs may red and understand it too; the only difficulty lies in these Words, And God blessed the Seventh Day, and sanctified it. Now it is observable, that the Seventh Day is three times mentioned in this Text, but the Sabbath not at all, nor indeed any where else, till it comes to be given as a Law to the Children of Israel: So that by the Seventh Day may be meant that particular Seventh Day next and immediately succeeding the Six Days of the Creation: For when all things had received their Being and Means of Subsistence by the Power and Goodness of God, and these Benefits were fresh, surprising and amazing upon them, it cannot be imagined but that all, especially Angels and Man, should with all Joy and Wonder break forth, and with their utmost Vigour strain themselves, to set forth the Praises of their Maker: So that not only God himself was at that time pleased with, and approved what he had done, but the Creature was most sensible, and thankful for the wonderful Benefit. And thus that particular Seventh Day seems in a particular manner to be consecrated to God's Glory: And this Sense will flow easily, naturally and directly from the Words; but then they make little or nothing to enforce an Observation of the Sabbath, which some would hence infer. Now though this is true, yet I shall not insist on it; for I do verily believe that Moses, in these Words, had a farther Meaning than all this; and it is agreed on all hands, that he here gives the Reason why God did make choice of the Seventh Day rather than any other, on which he did fix the Sabbath: But whether not only the Reason be given, but the Institution itself set up and declared at this time, is the great Question. That I may not be troublesone or tedious in running after trifling or little Matters, the principal Opinions in this Case are two; whereof, the one will needs find a present Institution in these Words; the other says, they are spoken by way of Prolepsis, or Anticipation: The one says, that God resting on the Seventh Day from the Works of the Creation, did then, at that very time, appoint and constitute that Day to be a Sabbath to all Generations: The other says, That Moses having given us a Relation of the Works of the Creation on the Six Days, and God's Resting on the Seventh, took occasion thence to tell us the Reason why God fixed on that Day for the Sabbath, which he appointed to the Jews in Moses's Time, and by the Mediation of Moses; and which, for that Reason, he might best know. Those who are for an Institution of the Sabbath at this time, rely solely on this Text for their Evidence and Proof; yet so, as they are apt to suppose that the patriarches, in their Worship, did pay some Deference to this Day. But that Supposition is utterly groundless, there being no Footsteps of any such thing in all the Scripture-History of the patriarches, nor any colour to pretend that they had a Regard to any fixed Sabbath. The only Reason why they suppose so, is their first Mistake, because they think the Sabbath to be instituted at this time, and that therefore they would not have utterly neglected God's Institution: But if this prove an error, then they only beat the Air, and this Argument vanishes into nothing. Now that the Sabbath was not at this time instituted, but only a Reason given, why that Day was made choice of when it was afterwards instituted, will be very clearly evident, if we consider either those Reasons which the Scripture suggests to us, or the Matter of fact therein all along related; some of which I shall lay down now, and others will occasionally offer themselves as we shall proceed in unfolding the whole Matter. These Words, God blessed the Seventh Day, and sanctified it, if extended to relate to any thing farther than that particular Seventh Day immediately following the Creation, are an Historical Narration telling us what was done, not when it was done. And therefore, if we can find out a certain Time, when the Sabbath was instituted, it is good Reason to refer these Words to that Time, as giving us the Reason why, in the Institution of the Sabbath, God made choice of that Day, rather than any other. Now nothing is more evident than that God instituted the Sabbath many Generations after, in the time of Moses, from whom we have the Account both of the Creation and that Institution. Now when we have a certain Time of the Sabbatical Institution, to leave that, and seek after an uncertain, imaginary Time, is to desert plain Truth in the open Field, and hunt after error. So that the most that can be made of these Words, in the strictest Interpretation, can amount to no more than this, That God might then sanctify the Seventh Day by Destination to be made a Sabbath, which he actually performed in the time of Moses, and by his Mediation, who gives us the Reason of it. Farther, When the Commandment for the Sabbath was by God's Appointment published by Moses, these very Words are repeated and inserted in the Body of it, as the Reason of its being instituted on that Day, and therefore ought to be supposed to refer to that time: And when we find no other Institution of the Sabbath, and these Words particularly applied to it, and urged as the Reason of it, what can we think, but that it was intended for that Institution? And if any former Institution be fought for, then the Mosaical will not be the First, but the Second, or rather a Revival of a former Institution; in which case we may reasonably suppose that such former Institution would have been taken notice of, or at least there or some where else hinted at: But the Mosaical Institution takes no manner of notice of any former Institution, but is plainly delivered as a new thing; nor is there any where the least Intimation of any former Observation of it, as shall be more fully declared hereafter. Again, If we inquire after the End and Design of the Institution of the Sabbath, God himself thus tells the Jews what it was; Exod. 31.13. It is a Sign betwixt me and you throughout all your Generations. And long after, God quickens them to their Duty, remembering them of the same thing by the Prophet; Hallow my Sabbaths, Ezek. 20.20. and they shall be a Sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the Lord your God. So that the Observation of the Sabbath was to be a Mark of their being God's peculiar People, and of their being under his special Protection and Favour, and to put a Difference between them and the rest of the profane World. Now, how could this be, if the Sabbath was before appointed to Adam in the State of Innocency? For then it would have concerned him and all his Posterity, and reached to all Mankind; and so could not have been a Sign between God and the Israelites; i.e. that he was in a peculiar manner their God, and they his peculiar People: For that which is common to all, cannot be a distinguishing Mark or Character of one from another; and if all had the Sabbath before, it could be no peculiar Right or Mark of the Jews then; from whence we may reasonably conclude, that the Sabbath was not instituted till given by Moses, to the Children of Israel. I shall now for a while leave this sort of Reasoning, to run along with the History, and inquire after Matter of Fact, and try if we can trace out any such Observation before the Time of Moses; and if no Sabbatizing appear, we may conclude there was none at that time; for, for a thing not to be, or not to appear to be, is much the same thing as to our passing a judgement upon it; especially if there be Reason to think that there could not, in all likelihood, fail to be sufficient Evidence to make the thing appear, if there were any such thing at all. Now, though the World soon degenerated, and the Generality fell into all lewd and abominable Practices, yet there were some all along who stood firm to the Worship of God, and in defiance of all the Provocations, Temptations and Abuses of a wicked World, did openly profess and adore his holy Name: And if this certain Sabbath was not observed either by those brave Heroical Men of the first Ages of the World, styled the Sons of God, or by any other of the Generation of the faithful and true Worshippers of God, till the Time of Moses, we may conclude that there was no such Institution known; for had it been known, doubtless it would not have been neglected, at least not by all of them; and being the least Footsteps of it are not to be found in their practise, Sayings, or otherwise, it is reasonable to infer there was no such thing; for had it been instituted, it could not have escaped their Knowledge, for whose sake it was instituted; and had they known it, we cannot think such extraordinary Religious Persons would so unanimously have affronted God in profaning it: And therefore, unless we will condemn all those Generations of the Just, we must allow the Sabbath not to be instituted till the Time of Moses. But to make this more plain, let us descend to Particulars, and make our Search from the Beginning; these Words of Moses, concerning God's resting on the Seventh Day, and sanctifying it, relate to the Time immediately following the Creation; and therefore, if any Sabbatical Institution then obligatory on Man be intended by them, it must be given to Adam in Paradise. But what Reason could there be to set apart one Day from the rest, to him, whose every Day's Employment was the Worship, Honour and Service of his God, without any Avocations from it? He was seated in the midst of Delight and Plenty, where all things were abundantly provided to his hand; so that no toilsome Labour or Fore-cast for the Supply of his Necessities could take him off, or hinder him from the Exercise of his Duty towards his Maker: And his Life was then a State of Innocence, wherein Sin was unknown; so that Care, and Pains, and Sin, being then Strangers to him, every Day, for the Use of it, was a Sabbath to him, and not one above another. Moreover, He had then a particular Familiarity with God, who conversed daily with him; and therefore we must allow him not only to pay a purer and more constant Worship, but after an especial manner to be with God there. And as hence it appears that there was no need or occasion for a particular Sabbath in Paradise, so the nicest Reading will not afford any Intimation that Adam observed any such there. But the Devil will slip in where he finds the least Opportunity, or Advantage; for repining at, and envying Man's happy State, he watched his Time, and gained his Point, to tempt him to his Fall, whereby Man corrupted his Faculties, and derived that Corruption to his Posterity; and he that was created after the Image of God, Gen. 5.3. having now defaced that Image, is said to beget a Son in his own Likeness, after his own Image. So that now the Case seemed to be much altered; for he that before wanted nothing, now in the Sweat of his Brows eats his Bread; the Ground being cursed for his sake, brought forth Thorns and briars, instead of pleasant Fruits; so that much of his Time and Pains was required to till, plant and order it, that it might afford him a Supply for his Bodily Necessities. And, worse than all this, his Nature being now corrupted, not only gave Satan greater Advantage, but he became too much his own Tempter, being too inclinable of himself to mis-spend his Time in Wickedness and Vanity. And when the Danger of Sin on the one hand, and Necessity of Labour on the other, either required, or was apt to steal away so much of his Time, it seemed very requisite and convenient to sequester some part of it for the Worship of God, lest in process of time it should be totally neglected, and Sin get the Dominion over him. And that he did so, is certain; but whether that Time was arbitrary or fixed, what proportion of Time was allowed, or whether any certain Proportion of Time, is uncertain. It is reasonable from the History to conclude, that all along more or less was allotted for that purpose, according as the Persons were more religiously inclined, and the Fear of God more prevailed with them: But that God himself did as yet prescribe any such Proportion of Time as One Day in Seven, which all without Exception should entirely dedicate to his Worship, whatever other Time they might freely of their own accord allow for that Use, I think doth no where appear; neither was there as yet the same Occasion for it as there was afterwards, as I presume will be made evident by the Sequel of this Discourse. That Adam was a very sorrowful and sincere Penitent for his Sin, is generally agreed; nor can it be well imagined, but that the Sense of his Fall from so happy a State, into such a troublesone, dangerous and damnable Condition, should wound his very Soul with a deep Sorrow, even to Confusion; and so much the more, for that God himself was the Reprover of his Crimes, whose Reprehensions could not be withstood, but struck him to the Heart; and though God, in Mercy and Compassion, did administer Comfort to his afflicted Mind, and enter afresh into Covenant with him, making his lost Condition recoverable through the Promise of the messiah; yet was it Conditional, which kept him ever upon the Good Behaviour; and doubtless, not only the Sense of his own Sin and Fall, but the Injury he had done his Posterity, made him not only more watchful over himself, but more careful to instruct and bring up his Children in the Fear of the Lord; and accordingly, we find them exercised in Acts of Religious Worship. Cain brings of the Fruit of the Ground an Offering unto the Lord; Gen. 4.3, 4. and Abel, he brings of the Firstlings of his Flock, and of the Fat thereof. Here are Instances of Worship, but no Instance of any Sabbath; and that there should be Instances of Worship, for which there is no Precept recorded, and none of any Sabbath, nor any Complaint of the Neglect of it, for which some would pretend a Precept, seems very strange if there had been any such Precept: And indeed, though there is no Precept recorded, yet it is reasonable to believe that there had some Precept or Direction been given by God concerning Sacrifice, for the Fact is here accepted and approved by God; for though it is true that God had not respect to Cain, and his Offering, yet it was not because he disallowed the Fact, but reproves the Falseness and hypocrisy of the Man, whose Heart was not right in what he did; for had the Fact itself been disallowed, Abel's Offering must have been rejected, as well as Cain's. And it is very probable that this was not the first Offering; for we red how, immediately after the Fall, God made to Adam and his Wife Coats of Skins, and clothed them: Gen. 3.21. Now it is utterly unlikely, that in so short a time, and before the Curse upon the Earth, any Beasts should die of themselves; and there was no Occasion to kill any for Food, because Man ate no Flesh till after the Flood: It is therefore most probable that they were the Skins of Beasts killed for Sacrifice; not for Sin-Offerings, Man having no Occasion for that before the Fall; but as Holocausts, or Thank-Offerings, in acknowledgement that he received all from God, and owed all to him. And therefore it is reasonable to conclude, that the Precept or Direction for Sacrifice was given to Man even in Paradise: But the Reason why it is not recorded seems to be this; That Moses, when he wrote this History, was by the Command of God to prescribe the Rules of all sorts of Sacrifices, even to the minute Circumstances of them; and so there being no farther Use for any former Precept, it was needless to rehearse it. But if there had been any former Precept concerning the Sabbath, it had been highly needful to refresh their Memory with it, when it had been so totally neglected. After the murder of Abel, it pleased God to give Adam another Son, Seth, who trod in the Steps of his Brother Abel, and from whom the Posterity of the Faithful were continued. And in the Time of his Son Enos it is said, Gen. 4.26. That then began Men to call upon the Name of the Lord; or rather, in strictness of Reading, to have the Name of the Lord called upon them; i.e. as it is in the Margin more agreeable to our English idiom, to call themselves by the Name of the Lord; hereby distinguishing themselves from the boisterous Posterity of Cain, who either neglected the Worship of God, or, like their Father Cain, did not perform it with a true and faithful Heart, but lived viciously and profanely, as the Distinction is after plainly set down; where showing how the total Degeneracy of Mankind was at last brought about, it is said, That the Sons of God saw the Daughters of Men, Gen. 6.1, 2. that they were fair, &c. And though it appears that there was all along hitherto, a Generation of the faithful and true Worshippers of God, yet is there not the least Intimation of any Sabbath observed by them, or neglected by the other. It is recorded of Enoch, Gen. 3.23, 24. that he lived Three Hundred sixty and five Years before his Translation; and this Testimony is given of him, that he walked with God; i.e. the whole Course of his Life was such a continued Exercise of Piety and Devotion, that he was in an extraordinary manner pleasing to God, insomuch that he suffered him not to die, as other Men, but immediately translated him to a more happy State. Indeed, the whole Scene of this Man's Life, for his Conversation and Holiness, may seem to be as one entire Sabbath, and I wish others could follow the Pattern; but there is not the least Intimation that he or any other observed any fixed Sabbath, as remarkable and distinguishable from other Times. If we proceed now to the Times immediately preceding the Deluge, when God was so highly provoked with the Wickedness of the Old World, that he resolved to destroy the whole Race of Mankind, except Noah and his Family, he is pleased to tell us the Causes that moved him to sand this severe judgement; Gen. 6. their great and irreclaimable Sins, as Gluttony, Drunkenness, Lasciviousness, continual Barbarities, Outrages and Violence; Matth. 24.38. and that villainies and Villainous Contrivances had wholly possessed their very Thoughts and Hearts: But for Violation of the Sabbath, there is not the least Reproof, or Hint. Now, seeing God so severely reprehends the Jews for the profaning of his Sabbaths, and at every turn takes not so much notice of any Sin as this, certainly in enumerating the Sins of the old World, he would not have been altogether silent as to this, if there had been any Sabbath under Precept; and if there had, there can be no Doubt but such profligate Wretches as they are described to be, would have given him sufficient Occasion to mention it with the highest Indignation. But, in truth, that Sin, against which the Sabbath was afterwards devised and instituted, as a Bar and Fence, was not then crept into the World; for by reason of the long Lives of the patriarches,( Adam, the first Man, living even into the Days of Lamech, the Father of Noah,) it was not possible that the Tradition of the Creation should be corrupted, and the Notion of God the Creator of all Things defaced: And this was farther strengthened by those particular Manifestations which God frequently made of himself, to several Persons, in those first Ages; so that as yet there could be no Room for the Admission of Idolatry, which was the Sin which afterwards occasioned the Sabbath to be instituted. And hence I think it appears, that from Adam to the Time of the Flood, which is upwards of One Thousand and Six Hundred Years, though the Worship of God was all along carefully upheld in some particular Families, yet no such thing as the Institution of a Sabbath, or the Observation of it, was known to any. What hath been already said, may, I suppose, satisfy any impartial reasonable Man, that the Text in Genests doth not contain any present Institution, but only shows the Reason why God particularly fixed on that Day, when he afterwards instituted the Sabbath: So that now I might leap over the rest of the Time, and go presently to the Institution itself. But because the Consideration of the intermediate Time may contribute much to the Discovery of the true Reason which occasioned the Sabbath afterwards to be instituted, I shall begin again at Noah, and trace the Matter by fair and gentle Steps, till we come to overtake Moses in the Wilderness. When Noah and his Family were entered into the Ark, the Apprehensions of such a dreadful Universal judgement as swept away not only all Mankind, but the very Beasts of the Earth, and Fowls of the Air, must needs affect them with the deepest Sense of their own Danger, and stir them up to the most serious and passionate Devotion; their Vessel floating under them, without any Ground to touch on; the Heavens pouring down impetuous Showers, continually beating over their Heads; the horrid Outcries and Skreams of Men, Women and Children, round about them, sinking; and the fearful Roarings and strange Noises of Beasts and Fowl, in vain striving to avoid the common Destruction; these, I say, and other dismal Circumstances of that fatal Deluge, left no Room for Coldness and Indifferency, but did effectually rouse them to continual Praises of God for their Escape, and as continual Prayers that he would still preserve them. Nor was it a short Time that they were in this Condition: 〈◇〉 2.8. Forty Days, without Intermission, continued the Fury of that frightful Storm; an Hundred and Fifty Days the Waters prevailed, or increased; on the Seventeenth Day of the Second Month Noah entered into the Ark, and the Ark restend not on any Ground till the Seventeenth Day of the Seventh Month; and on the Seven and Tweentieth Day of the Second Month again, he and his Family went out of the Ark, and then so jealous and afraid, that they durst not stir out till God commanded them: So that they were a full Year confined to this Wooden Tenement, partly for fear of the Waters, partly because the Earth was not yet fit for Habitation. These things so quickened their Thankfulness and Devotion, that the first thing we red that Noah did after his coming out of the Ark, was, to build an Altar unto the Lord, and to take of every Clean Beast and Fowl, and offer Burnt-Offerings thereon; and there is no doubt but the Remembrance of those things struck an Awe, more or less, upon all those Persons all the Days of their Lives, though we find it did not work on all alike. However, neither in the Ark, nor out of the Ark, do we red of any Sabbath observed or mentioned by Noah or his Sons; which certainly they would not have neglected, had they ever heard of any such thing under Precept; and it would have been as reasonable to have expected that to be mentioned as Sacrificing, which yet is not done, either here, or at any time before, from the Creation. It is not to be doubted, but that the Deluge left a strong Impression on those who escaped it; and that they related it in all its terrible Circumstances, to their Children and Off-spring: And as it had the good Effect upon some, to keep them close and right to the Worship of God, and to seek their Protection from him; so it strook a strange terror in the worst, as we may perceive by their Contrivance in the Plain of Shinar, where they attempted, for their future Security, to build a Tower that should reach up to Heaven; such strange Dotages do Men run into, when not trusting to God, and his Promises, they will rely upon their own Inventions: Yet hitherto, though we red of great Wickedness, yet we hear nothing of any Idolatry in the World; but after the Confusion of Languages, when they went out by their Families and Colonies, and spread themselves over the Face of the Earth, and were gotten out of the more immediate Guardianship and Care of the patriarches, Noah and his Sons, as they spread and multiplied, so did also their Devices; and those who before provoked God, now began to forsake and renounce him, and to make Gods according to their own Humour, and vain Imaginations. The first practise of Idolatry which we find upon Record, was among the Chaldeans; and even the Father and Grandfather of Abraham, though not without a good Measure of Knowledge of, and Devotion towards the true God, were tainted with it; so prevalent a thing are the Customs of a Country, and constant Conversation amongst Sinners. This we learn from Joshua, whilst he warns the Israelites from relapsing into that dangerous Sin: ●sh. 24.2. Your Fathers( saith he) dwelled on the other side of the Flood,( i.e. the River Euphrates,) in old Time, even Terah, the Father of Abraham, and the Father of Nachor; and they served other Gods. This was in Ur of the Chaldees. The Jews, who abound with Whimsies and Fabulous Inventions, will needs have Ur to signify Fire, the God of the Chaldeans; whom Abraham refusing to worship after the manner of the Country, was forced( as they say) to depart thence. But this is a groundless Fiction; for Ur must signify a Place,( though perhaps taking its Name from the more celebrated Worship of their God there,) for Haran the Brother of Abraham died there, 〈◇〉. 11. ●. and it is called the Land of his Nativity. However, the true Reason of their leaving that Country, was, to avoid the practise of Idolatry, and the Temptations to it: And though Terah is said to take Abram his Son, Gen. 11.31. and Lot the Son of Haran, his Son's Son, &c. and to go forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the Land of Canaan; yet it seems that this was not so much from their own Inclination, as God's Direction, and over-ruling Hand: For Nehemiah tells us, that God did choose Abraham, Nehem. 9.2. and brought him out of Ur of the Chaldees; yet whether alured by the Riches and Pleasures of the Country, or stayed by the Infirmities of his old Father Terah, or for what other unknown Reason, it is evident that he took up short of his Journey's end, and dwelled in Haran, or Charran, till his Father Terah died; and even when Terah was dead he stirred not forward, but stayed hankering after his native Soil, and the Society of his Friends and familiar Acquaintance, till God again gives him a peremptory Command: Gen. 12.1. Get thee out of this Country, and from thy Kindred, and from thy Father's House, unto a Land that I will show thee; which was the Land of Canaan. Vers. 5. Now though there may be many Reasons for the same thing, yet the principal Reason why God commands him out of Chaldea, into this Country, seems to be this; That designing him for the Father of the Faithful, and from him to raise a peculiar People to himself, among whom his Name and true Worship should be preserved, as a Testimony against an apostatising World, he removed him out of an Idolatrous Country, to a place where the Worship of the true God was yet preserved; that not only he might be enur'd to the true Worship, but his Progeny brought up in it with less Danger of Infection; for as yet Idolatry had got none, or no considerable Footing in Canaan; for there we find Melchisedeck, Gen. 14.18, 19. the Priest of the most High God, blessing Abram: There we find Abimelech King of Gerar pleading with God for his Integrity, and calling his People a righteous Nation, Gen. 20.21. and making a Covenant with Abram in the Name of God. And though the Cities of Sodom and Gomorrha are charged with crying and unnatural Sins, yet are they not so much as insinuated to be guilty of Idolatry in any measure: And when the King of Sodom applied himself to Abram, after his Victory over the four Kings, Abram treats him not as an Idolater, Gen. 14.22. but speaks to him in the Name of the Lord, the most High God, Possessor of Heaven and Earth. And if Melchisedeck was Sem the Son of Noah,( as some think, and it is certain he lived into Abram's Time,) possibly the Freedom of this Country from Idolatry hitherto might, in a great measure, be owing to his Influence and Authority; though afterwards, when Idolatry did get in amongst them, it spread like a Plague, or general Infection, and they became as absurd, barbarous and cruel Idolaters as any Nations under Heaven. This Land God promised to Abraham and his Seed, that his Name and Worship should be there kept up, that they should be his People, and he their God: And the more to ensure him and them to him, he gave him the Covenant of Circumcision, to distinguish them from the Idolatrous Nations; and that it might be a Mark on them, and Remembrance to them, that they were under a Covenant with God to serve him alone; and for this Reason the uncircumcised Person was to be punished with Death, as if he renounced God and his Covenant: So that Circumcision was designed as a Preservative against Idolatry. But though there is nothing more opposite to that kind of Idolatry then in use, than the Observation of the Sabbath,( as shall appear hereafter;) yet is it not ever said that Abraham kept it, or that God commanded him to keep it, or ever blamed him for the Neglect of it; nor is it so much as once mentioned in all his Story. Hitherto therefore a Sabbath is not to be found. About or near this Time,( whether somewhat higher or lower,) in all probability, lived Job; for the Proof of which, passing by many Reasons used by others, I shall only insist on these two: First, the Age he lived to, which as it falls short of the patriarches who lived before, so it exceeds those which followed after; and therefore, considering by what Degrees the Longevity of the patriarches declined, it seems to be most fitly placed here, or hereabout. Scarce any of the patriarches before this time began to propagate their Issue till they were Thirty Years old, or more; if any began sooner, yet the Time is so small and inconsiderable, as not to be worth Notice: We may therefore allow him Thirty Years for that; and if then we consider that before Satan conspired against him he had Seven Sons and Three Daughters, Job 1. who( as the Circumstances of the Context afford us Reason to believe) were all grown Men and Women, we cannot well allow him less than Thirty Years upon that Account, probably it might be much more; so that he must be at least Sixty Years old before he sell under his Trial and Afflictions: The precise time of his Trial perhaps is not easily determined; but when God did rescue him out of the Hands of Satan, and vindicate him against the bitter Tongues of his Censorious Friends, and restored him to greater Plenty and Prosperity than he lived in before, it is expressly said, Job 42.16. that after this Job lived an Hundred and Forty Years: Now add the Sixty to this Hundred and Forty, and we cannot allow him to have lived less than Two Hundred Years; but the Tradition of the Jews is, that he lived Two Hundred and Forty, which has nothing of Improbability in it: Now, below this Time you will scarce find any who attained to either of these Ages. The other Reason inclining me to think thus, is this, That it is apparent that the Worship of the true God was yet preserved in the place where Job lived, not only in his Family, but among his Friends and Relations, and divers others; and yet it is as plain that Idolatry began then to steal in, and be practised amongst them; for it is against this which Job thus justifies himself; Job 31.26, 27, 28. If I beholded the Sun when it shined, or the Moon walking in Brightness, and my Heart hath been secretly enticed, or my Mouth hath kissed my Hand, this also were an Iniquity to be punished by the Judge; for I should have denied the God that is above. Which Words plainly relate to the Original Idolatry, in worshipping the Sun and Moon. Now in this very Chapter, wherein Job pleads his Cause, and asserts his Integrity and Innocence, even to very minute Particulars, he neither alleges his strict Observation of any particular Sabbath, nor apologises for the Neglect of any; nor do his Friends, those miserable Comforters, who raled up every thing, true and false, that they could imagine or device against him, accuse him of any thing of this kind; nor is there any Mention of the Sabbath throughout the whole Book, which treating in a manner wholly of Worship and Devotion towards God, the Sabbath had never escaped all their Discourses, if it had been known to them. If any will suppose that he might be ignorant of the Sabbath, as not being in the Line of Abraham, whether higher or lower; I answer, First, That the Supposition is founded on no Certainty, and the contrary more like to be true, most of our critics making him to descend from Abraham, at no great distance; though I rather incline to those who fetch it higher, making him not a Descendant from Abraham, but of his Kindred. But Secondly, Be it true or false, it is nothing to the purpose; for if the Precept of the Sabbath was given in Paradise, it would have been obligatory, not only to the Stock of Abraham, but all Mankind; and the Tradition of it would have been preserved, wherever the true Worship of God had been continued; which apparently was in the Families of Job and his Friends: Yea, this kind of Traditions stuck long amongst the very Heathens and Idolaters, and were preserved by certain Sorts or Sects of Men amongst them, for many Ages: For if we seriously examine those Remains we have of ancient Philosophy, before such time as the wanton, luxuriant Wits of the Greeks diverted it into Imaginary Hypotheses, and Formalized Systems, we shall find them little else than Traditional Fragments of the History of the Creation. But amongst profane Authors, I remember not any thing looking this way, unless with particular respect to the Sabbath of the Jews, which they seldom mention without Scorn and Derision, a thing never offered to their own Traditions, which they always treat with Reverence, though never so obscured with fabulous Superstructures, and extravagant Fancies. Let us now return again to Abraham and his Posterity, where we are most likely to find a Sabbath, if there be any to be found at that time. The whole Life of his Son Isaac was a continued Course of Piety; but amongst all his Devotions, and Religious Actions, there is not the least inkling of any Sabbatical Observation. The Life of Jacob was somewhat more troublesone; and though Abraham, to fly from Idolatry, at God's Command left Haran, to come into Canaan; yet Jacob being forced to leave Canaan, and fly to Haran, to avoid his Brother Esau's Wrath, was in danger to have brought Idolatry thence with him, into Canaan, at his Return; for after his long Servitude, being forced at last to convey himself away secretly from his Father-in-Law Laban, with his Wives and his cattle, he was very hotly pursued with no good Intention, if God had not prevented it; and when Laban overtook him, being able to charge him with no other Injury done to him, he very angrily asks him, Gen. 31.30. why he had stolen his Gods? Now his Gods, such as they were, were actually stolen; and though some think that Rachel stolen them, to prevent her Father's consulting which Way they were fled; and others suppose she did it, that they might be a Refuge to her against her Father's Wrath, if he pursued them; yet I am rather inclined to think her Design was, that by that Means she might be able, privately, and unknown to her Husband, to practise that kind of Worship which she had been brought up in, and which by long Use and Custom she had a Kindness for: And if it had not been expressly said, that Jacob knew not that Rachel had stolen them, yet considering how dearly he loved her, any one would believe him to have been utterly ignorant, who thinks of his Answer to Laban; Gen. 31.32. With whomsoever thou findest thy Gods, let him not live. However, Laban was cheated of his Gods; and they, in requital, began to infect Jacob's Family, and taint it with Idolatrous Practices: So little Good is to be expected from such Prizes, and so artificial is Satan in stealing in his Worship among Men; for afterwards we hear of them again, and that they came even to Jacob's Knowledge; for after the Slaughter of the Shechemites, when he feared the Country round about would fall upon him, he found himself under a Necessity to fly to God's special Protection, and to use all Means to procure his Favour: And in order hereunto, the first thing he does, is, to give a strict Charge to his Family, Gen. 35.2, 3. to put away the strange Gods that were among them; and lest it should be neglected, he takes care to do it himself, and then was in all hast for going to Bethel, to build an Altar unto God; and now, if ever, had been a Time to exhort them to a strict Observation of the Sabbath, as being a practise most contrary to, and inconsistent with Idolatry: But not a Word of that either here, or in the whole Story of his Life; so that we may reasonably suppose it to be a Thing utterly unknown to him. When Jacob and his Family went to live in Egypt, the Observation of a Sabbath may seem to have been a good Guard against the Egyptian Idolatry, and an excellent Plea in Joseph's Mouth to have obtained a separate Living for them in the Land of Goshen: But there is not the least Mention of any such Plea or practise during all Jacob's Life-time, and the Freedom of his Posterity there; and during their Captivity and Slavery, it is scarce to be expected; for he that doubled their Tale of Bricks, and denied their Allowance of Straw, and yet said they were idle, would certainly never so far forego his Profit, and cease from his Haughtiness and Malice, as to give them entirely One Day in every Seven, wherein to do just nothing at all; though if they had apprehended themselves to have lain under any such Obligation, doubtless as well the Desire of their own Refreshment and Ease, as of God's Glory, would have moved them sadly to bewail their woeful Condition, that they were not suffered to act according to it: But there is no manner of Complaint upon that Account. But there had been no Reason to blame them for Neglect of the Sabbath, which they knew nothing of, if they had not in a manner wholly fallen off from the Worship of the true God, and in Compliance with their hard Masters, joined with them in serving their Idols; Josh. 24.14. which Joshua directly charges them with. They seem to have had some Remembrance of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but little to mind his Worship: And when afterwards God, with a stretched-out Arm, brought them out of Egypt, notwithstanding all his Signs and Wonders, they still retained a strong Propensity towards Idolatry; in so much that when Aaron, in the Absence of Moses, made them a Calf, in imitation of the Egyptian Apis, they almost ran mad for Joy; and never appeared so hearty in any Act of Devotion towards God, as in this Fit of Idolatry towards their new-made Idol; so hardly were they weaned from it. But in all their Journeyings, we red not of any Stop they made for the Observation of any Sabbath; nor that God required any of them, though he went continually before them, until they came to the Wilderness of Sin; from which time to the Creation, is above Two Thousand Five Hundred Years; but according to the Computation of some, much above Three Thousand; the lowest of which Accounts contains above one half of the Time, from the Creation, to the Coming of the messiah: In all which time, the Observation of the Sabbath seems to be a Thing utterly unknown, and unheard of. I suppose no Man doubts, but that the pious patriarches did allot a good Portion even of every Day for the Worship and Service of God; and that, as there was Occasion, they had extraordinary Times of Devotion and Sacrifices: But that they lay under any Obligation to observe the same with the Mosaical Sabbath, doth so little appear from their practise, or any other Evidence, that they seem utterly ignorant of any such thing; which could scarce possibly be, if any such thing had been then enjoined. Some there are, who, notwithstanding all that has been said, do peremptorily assert a Sabbath upon one Day in Seven; and particularly upon that Seventh Day from the Creation, in its constant Return, to have been Natural and Moral, and as such observed before the Time of Moses, though not clothed with those Circumstances, nor enjoined under those Penalties as the Mosaical Sabbath was. But in two Things these Persons seem to forget themselves, whereby they plainly overthrow their own Assertion: First, That they themselves refer it to Institution, and particularly to that Act of God mentioned in the fore-cited place of Genesis: But if it be by Institution, then it is positive, and consequently not natural. Secondly, They not only allow it to be changeable and alterable, but expressly affirm it to be changed and altered; and for this Assertion bring Reasons no ways contemptible. But what is Natural and Moral, is of Eternal Obligation, and admits not of Change or Alteration; and thus all is unraveled again, and their own Reasonings overthrow their primary Assertion. I must confess, that could they prove it Natural and Moral, I would give up the Cause without more ado: But when their own Arguments about the same thing do evidently prove that it is not so, and their Assertion that it is so is not supported with one good Argument, I must crave their Pardon if I cannot comply with them. But though what is now said may be a sufficient Answer to these Men, yet it is not so to those unhappy Persons who take a larger Stretch, affirming the Sabbath-Day to be Natural, Moral and Unchangeable; and upon that Account observe the Seventh Day from the Creation, in opposition to the Lord's Day, or Christian Sabbath: And yet even these Men run upon the first error of the former; for they lay that Text in Genesis( that God blessed the Seventh Day, and sanctified it) for their Foundation, and so must refer it to Institution if they should be pressed; and even in that are not without some Mistake. Now what is Natural and Moral, is agreeable to the Dictates of Natural Reason, and may be known, or at least in a good measure discovered by it. Supposing then that Text in Genesis to have been unrecorded, I desire them to tell me, how by their own Natural Reason they would have found out any more Morality in the Seventh Day, than in any of the other Six? If here they should have recourse to Pythagorean or Mystical Numbers, I must crave Leave to tell them, That in a Matter wherein they lay an Obligation on all Mankind, they ought to offer such Reasons as may satisfy all Mankind, and may be apprehended by the meanest Capacities which have the Use of Reason. But if here they be at a loss, they must then fly to Revelation and Institution, which agrees not with their first Assertion; and if they be mistaken in applying that too,( as I think hath been made appear they are,) they will be woefully out. That it is a Moral Duty to worship God, and to pay him all Honour and Service, our own Natural Reason will at any time teach us; and our Consciences accuse us, if we neglect it at fit Opportunities: And when any part of Time is set apart for God's Worship, thereby a Relative Holiness is affixed to it, which challengeth our Regard and Observance of it: But that any part of Time, the Fifth, Sixth or Seventh Day, this Minute, or the last, or that which is to come, hath more Holiness or Morality in it, as to its own Nature, than any other, I could never yet understand; or indeed, that there is any Morality or Holiness at all, properly speaking, in any part of Time whatsoever, in its own Nature. Those therefore who will needs set up a Natural Sabbath, have started an Invention of their own, without any good Ground or Reason for it. Yet some there are who will suppose that the patriarches before Moses did observe the Sabbath, or at least had some particular regard to the Seventh Day: For( say they) the Tradition of the Creation was, doubtless, preserved among them; and they knew that it was finished in Six Days, and that God restend on the Seventh; and therefore certainly they would take particular notice of it, and express particular Thankfulness for it. Now there is no Question to be made, but that they were thankful for it; and so they might be at any time: But that their Thankfulness or Worship was particularly limited to the Seventh Day, is not easily to be believed, when there is not so much as one Instance of it: Or if we should allow them so groundless a Supposition, yet it may be said that they might sometimes do it upon the Score of Convenience and Choice, and not of Obligation; and if they knew that God restend on the Seventh Day, so they knew also that he did so on the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Day, and ever since, from the Works of the Creation; and therefore if the Rest be the Reason of it, they must have kept a Sabbath not particularly on the Seventh, but on every Day since those Six Days; though God did not then, or now, so rest, but that he continued the Influx of his Power and Goodness, in the Preservation of his Creatures. And, after all, Why may they not as well be thankful for his Works of the Creation, as for his Resting from them; and so at any time, upon Occasion, make particular choice of any Day of the Six, to render particular Thanks and Praise for the particular Blessings of that Day's Creation? But this they would fain be at, though there is no manner of Evidence for it; That the patriarches knew the Sabbath to be instituted at the Time of God's Rest: But this I say they did not know; for they could not know the Sabbath was instituted before it was instituted, and it was not instituted till after their Time, as plainly appears from the History of its Institution: And as for the Words of Moses, in Genesis, they do not at all express any former Institution, but evidently relate to the Reason of that instituted in his Time; and the most that can be fairly made of them, is this, That Moses received and promulgated the Law before he wrote the Pentateuch, or Five Books commonly so called, and therefore the Sabbath was instituted, and very well known at that Time when he wrote of the Creation: Now he beginning at the Creation,( as was most reasonable to do,) having there a fit Opportunity, set down the Reason why God particularly made choice of that Day, whereon to fix the Sabbath, which was instituted and known at that time when he wrote, though not at the Time whereof he wrote. And this will more plainly appear now that we come to consider the Institution of the Sabbath, and the Reason of it. CHAP. II. Of the Institution and Obserservation of the Jewish Sabbath, and other Matters relating thereto. SEveral Injunctions were by God laid upon the Jews, which, in general, were designed to be as distinguishing Marks or Characters upon them, that they were God's peculiar People, and to bind them fast to his Worship and Service, and to secure them from the Idolatrous Worship then prevailing in the World. After God had commanded Abram to leave his own Country to go into Canaan, he strictly enjoins him the Use of Circumcision, Gen. 17.11. as to all his Males; And this( saith the Lord) shall be a Token of the Covenant betwixt me and you: That is, It should distinguish them from other People, and be a Mark of their Obligation and Dedication to the Worship of the true God. But though God tells him, that in Isaac his Seed should be called, Gen. 21.12. i.e. the peculiar People, and messiah should flow from his Loins, yet the Circumcision went along with his Son Ishmael and his Posterity, as also with his Sons by Keturah; and how long or short a Time it had any Influence upon them, to contain them within any tolerable Bounds of Duty, we have no Certainty. And then as to the Posterity of Isaac, we find his Son Jacob to be the chosen Person, yet was Esau circumcised as well as he: And even upon the Posterity of Jacob, Circumcision was not so effectual, but that in their Egyptian Bondage they served other Gods. When therefore God brought them out of Egypt, with Design to bring them into the promised Land; and had lead them in the Wilderness, to wean them from their Idolatrous Practices; and wrought mighty Wonders, to convince them whom they ought to worship; as a thing more peculiar to them than Circumcision, and a stronger Preservative against Idolatry than that could be, he institutes the Sabbath, that so his Honour and Worship might remain among Men, and they might be secured to continue his People. The first time we find the Observation of the Sabbath Day enjoined, is in the Wilderness of Sin, before they came to Mount Sinai, where the Ten Commandments were delivered; as if it were purposely to distinguish the Day, which is Ceremonial, and of Divine positive Institution, from the Worship itself, which is Moral; that so when we find it afterwards among the Ten Commandments, which contain Moral Duties, we might know it to be added, the better to ascertain the practise of that Worship, which is Moral, and required by the same Commandment; not that it was the less to be regarded for being a Divine positive Institution, but rather more carefully and cautiously to be observed by them, to whom the Law was given; as being a higher Testification of their Submission and Obedience, than if the Duty had been natural. The Words expressing the Institution, are by way of Notice to the People; Exod. 16.23. To morrow is the Rest of the holy Sabbath unto the Lord: And upon the Day itself; Vers. 25. To day is a Sabbath unto the Lord. From which Words some will needs infer, that the Sabbath was known and observed by the Jews before, because( say they) it is here spoken of as a known Thing. But this is a Force upon the Words, and a gross Mistake, for it is evidently spoken of as a new Thing; else what means that frequent Inculcation to make the People take notice of it, if it had been familiar to them before? And what means the coming of the Rulers of the Congregation to Moses, to consult him as in an unusual and unknown Matter, when the People, by Direction, had gathered double the quantity of Manna on the Sixth Day? Exod. 16.22. Much the like kind of Expression is used in the Institution of the Passover; Exod. 12.11. And ye shall eat it in hast, it is the Lord's Passover. From which Words, perhaps some Men would think that the Jews had been very well acquainted with the Passover before that time; whereas indeed, the Passover was neither known, nor thought of by them till that time, when God made known to them what he would do, and what he would have them to do in that particular Case: Nor was the thing itself acted till the Night following. So that they are Words plainly giving notice of a new Institution. Again it is observable, Exod. 16.27. that upon this very first Sabbath some of the People went out to gather Manna: Now if they had not known, and been told, that there should be none to be found on that Day; yet they must have known that they ought not to have gone out to seek it, if they had been acquainted with the Law of the Sabbath before. But that which seems to me to put the thing out of question, is, the Case of the Man who gathered Sticks on the Sabbath Day; Numb. 15. for when he was accused, they knew not what to do with him; but were fain to keep him in Hold, till they consulted God in the Matter. By which it appears plainly to be a new Thing, not yet adjusted; for had it been a Law from the Creation, it is scarce possible that all Men should have been ignorant whether any Punishment or not, and what, did belong to the Violation of a Law of such standing. That there was a Sabbath commanded and observed in the Wilderness of Sin, is evident enough; but it seems to be rather by way of Probation and Trial, and to prepare and fit them for what was to follow, than to lay a standing and continued Obligation: And the Observation of every Seventh Day as a Sabbath, seems then to pass into a Law, binding the Jews and their Posterity, when it was promulgated from Mount Sinai: For those Men who went out to gather Manna on the Sabbath Day in the Wilderness of Sin, were not punished, though God did show himself highly offended at them; but he that gathered Sticks on the Sabbath, after the Promulgation of the Law from Mount Sinai, was stoned to death by the whole Congregation of Israel. So that the Law of the Sabbath seems then first to have taken place, Numb. 15.35, 36. and be of full force, binding the Jews and their Posterity, when it was delivered from Mount Sinai. Two great Ends God seems to have had in the Institution of the Sabbath: First, That by prefixing a certain proportion of Time, whereon his Worship, without Failure, or any manner of Excuse, should be celebrated, he might thereby secure the Continuance of it among Men; which by reason of their corrupt Nature, and Backwardness to Good, might have been in danger to be neglected, or by degrees grown out of use, if the Times had been left to their own Choice or Appointment: Not but that they might lawfully and laudably worship God at all other times, as they had Opportunity; but that at that time none whatsoever might neglect it. Secondly, That by fixing on such a Time, and so circumstantiated, as did unavoidably represent to their Thoughts and Apprehensions the true God, whom they ought to worship, he might preserve them from being ensnared or tainted with that Idolatrous Worship which prevailed in the World, and make Idolatry and the Worship of the true God incompatible. This will be better understood by inquiring into the Idolatry of those Times, which the Scripture frequently informs us to be the Worship of the Heavenly Host, the Sun, Moon and Stars, but especially the Sun, which is a Creature so glorious and Majestical in itself, and of so universal Influence, Comfort and Benefit to Mankind, and all the Creatures, that when Men are lead never so little too much by their Senses, it is enough to dazzle the Eyes of their Understanding, as well as of their Bodies, and tempt them to adore it. Hence God himself, when he forbids the making of any manner of Image for Worship, particularly cautions his People against their too fond gazing on and admiring the Sun, Moon and Stars, and the Danger of so doing; Deut. 4.19. Lest( saith he) thou lift up thine Eyes unto Heaven, and when thou seest the Sun, and the Moon, and the Stars, even all the Host of Heaven, shouldst be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the Lord thy God hath divided unto all Nations under the whole Heaven. I must confess that I am inclinable to think, that even at this time the Egyptians, under some of their Symbols, might pay some kind of Veneration to the Nile: For in a Country where they either had no Rain, or none for Good, a River, whose Head was then unknown, and whose unaccountable, yet steady Overflowings enriched their Country beyond all others, so that they seemed to stand in need of nothing but the Sun and Nilus, might create strange Apprehensions in them, and make them believe that there was some Divinity in it: And hence possibly, in succeeding Times, that other sort of Idolatry might travail to divers other Nations, amongst whom every River had its Deity, and every Fountain was Sacred. But however, for Moses's Time, and long after, the Scripture takes no notice of any actual False Worship, but that of the Heavenly Host; a sort of Idolatry, which first stolen into the World, and long possessed it, and to which all Nations were then addicted. Now, when God made choice of, and established that Day for a Sabbath, whereon he himself restend from the Works of the Creation, and doth it in Memory thereof, and makes that the Reason of it, ( It is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God,) and so circumstantiated the Observation of it, that almost every part of it did naturally call to their Minds that God that made the Heavens, and the Earth, and all things that are therein, it must necessary teach them, that that God was only to be worshipped, and not the Sun, Moon and Stars, or any Creatures whatsoever, which he had created for the Use and Benefit of Man; and for which they ought therefore to be thankful, and glorify him, and not to worship them as Gods; for that were to reproach, and what in them lay to dethrone him. So that whilst they were sincere and exact in the Observation of the Sabbath, it was morally impossible that they should fall into Idolatry; for to worship him as the Creator of the Host of Heaven, was to aclowledge them to be his Creatures, for the Benefit of which they ought to praise him; not Gods, which they ought to worship: And to worship them as Gods, were to deny them to be his Creatures, and to put them in his stead, and reject him: The Worship of the one was a Contradiction to the Worship of the other, and both could not subsist together. To this purpose it is observable, that whenever the Jews fell from the Worship of the true God to Idolatry, they instantly neglected the Observation of his Sabbath; which would have flown in their Faces, and been an evident Testimony against them, and an undeniable Conviction of their abominable Practices: And therefore the Prophet accusing them that they polluted God's Sabbaths, Ezek. 20.16. immediately subjoins this as the Reason, for their Hearts went after their Idols. And when Antiochus Epiphanes made it his Business to destroy the whole Jewish Worship, and thereby to root out all the Worship of the true God out of the World, as a principal thing to effect his Design, he commands by his Letters, that they should profane the Sabbath and Festival-Days: 1 Macc. 1.45. And when we are told how far his wicked Purpose was successful, it is said, Vers. 43. that many also of the Israelites consented to his Religion, and sacrificed unto Idols; and then immediately follows, and profaned the Sabbath; as if the one were the natural Consequence of the other; and it had been impossible to seduce them to Idolatry, unless he could make them cast off the Observation of the Sabbath. Hence it is, that we find a strict Charge of the Observation of the Sabbath, and the Prohibition of Idolatry, generally to go hand in hand. Thus when God had said to the Jews, Levit. 26.1, 2. Ye shall make you no Idols, nor graved Image; neither rear you up a Standing Image; neither shall you set up any Image of ston in your Land, to bow down unto it; for I am the Lord your God; the very next Words are, Ye shall keep my Sabbaths, and reverence my Sanctuary. So when the Prophet Ezekiel rehearseth God's Commands given to them in the Wilderness, Ezek. 20.18, 19, 20. that they should not walk in the Statutes of their Fathers, neither observe their Judgments, nor defile themselves with their Idols; thereby referring to what they had done in Egypt, he presently adds, And hallow my Sabbaths; and they shall be a Sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the Lord your God. And throughout the whole Law and the Prophets, nothing is more strictly and frequently enjoined, than the Observation of the Sabbath; nothing more highly blamed, or oftener prohibited, than the polluting it; as if the Fate of the whole Worship of God depended in a manner upon this single Institution, and the due Observation of it. And for this Reason, doubtless, it is introduced in that singular manner, and a particular Mark thus set upon it; Remember the Sabbath-day, &c. As if whilst they did duly observe that, they could not forget God, nor neglect his Worship; but if they did forget that, they would certainly fall away from him. It was not only a Sign betwixt God and them, but their Security from Idolatry and False Worship. Hence also it is very obvious to observe, that the very Jewish Rest itself, or Cessation from Toil and Labour, as considered distinct from the direct Worship on that Day, was of great Use, Signification and Efficacy, as to the Design for which it was commanded: For that Rest being required to be punctually observed, in Memory of God's Rest or Cessation from the Works of the Creation, and the one made the Reason of the other, the very Rest itself did inform them, that it was the God that made Heaven and Earth, upon whose Account they restend; and that therefore he alone was to be worshipped as God, and not the Sun, Moon or Stars, or any of the Creatures which he had made: And to rest upon that Account, and to worship other Gods, was to to give Testimony against, and condemn themselves. And thus we see that the very Rest itself was designed as a Preservative against Idolatry. And here it may be seasonably considered, with what Strictness and Exactness this Rest was to be observed, that so the Rest of God, upon which Account it was celebrated, might be more strongly imprinted in their Minds, and more powerfully excite them to his Worship. The general Command is, Exod. 20. Thou shalt do no manner of Work, thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, &c. That is, no manner of Work which was their usual Business on the other Six Days, and made for their Secular Profit, Benefit, or Advantage: But it is not to be extended to such Works as God himself had commanded, as proper for his Worship on that Day; and therefore they did, without scruple, circumcise on that Day; and the Sacrifices were performed in the Temple on that Day, in the dressing, ordering and managing of which, there was no small Toil and Labour; and yet it was no Breach of the Sabbath, as being a direct acknowledgement of God, and by his Command. Neither was it intended against Works of Mercy and Compassion; for the most rigid Jews thought it lawful to pull the Ox or Ass out of the Ditch on the Sabbath-Day, and upon that account our Saviour justifies his healing the Diseased on the same Day; nor yet against what was really and truly necessary; upon which Score our Saviour vindicates his Disciples in pulling the Ears of Corn, and rubbing them on the Sabbath-Day; for Hunger is a Disease that brings speedy Death, if it have not seasonable Relief: And therefore there is no need to say,( as some do,) that it was done by Dispensation; for doubtless, our Saviour, who came to fulfil the Law, would never give his Disciples a licence to violate the Sabbath while it was in force. But more particularly, there are several things prescribed as to the manner of observing this Rest; as, First, They were not only forbid common Labours, but even the dressing their ordinary Provisions on that Day. Therefore, on the Day before the Sabbath, Exod. 16.23. saith Moses, Bake that ye will bake to day, and seeth that ye will seeth; and that which remains over, lay up for you, to be kept until the Morning, And when they had observed his Order, on the next Day, which was the Sabbath, Vers. 25. he says, Eat that to day, for to day is a Sabbath unto the Lord: i.e. They should forbear even that seeming necessary Labour of dressing their Victuals on that Day, in Memory of God's Rest; thereby continually to immind them of that God whom they ought to worship. Hence, I suppose, arose that Mistake amongst the Heathens, who often ridiculed the Jews as fasting on that Day: But their error sprung from their Ignorance of the Reason of their Actions; for the Sabbath was a principal Festival among them; and though they dressed their Provisions the Day before, yet there is not a Jew to this Day, but he will fare better than ordinary on the Seventh Day, though he pinch for it all the other Six. Another Command which Moses gives in reference to this Rest, is this, Abide ye every Man in his Place, Exod. 16.29. let no Man go out of his Place on the Seventh Day. But here we must be careful rightly to understand what is meant by his Place: For some tell of strange Extravagancies that certain superstitious Jews have run into by mis-interpreting this Command; as if a Man was neither to lye along, stand, or walk, but sit still all the Sabbath-Day: Others did not limit the Postures, but were no less frantickly zealous; asserting that a Man ought to abide all the Day in that very place where he happened to be on the Beginning of the Sabbath. But there was no such thing intended: And that we may the more clearly understand what is here meant, we must know that this Command was given in the Wilderness, where the People were encamped about the Tabernacle; from whence to the farthest Tents, most agree to be about a Mile: Now from thence to the Tabernacle they must go, because there was a holy Convocation commanded to be on that Day, where they ought in Duty to appear. And therefore, by their Place here must be meant, not the Place strictly where he sate, lay or stood, nor his whole Tent, nor what was afterwards his Habitation; but the Camp of Israel, out of which he might not go, either to gather Manna, or for any Servile or Secular Employments; but in which he might, and must go from his Tent to the Tabernacle, for the Worship of God. This Space is commonly accounted a Sabbath-Day's Journey, which some will have to be one, others two Miles; and so it might be said to be properly enough, whilst they were in the Wilderness: But if we pursue the Reason of the Thing, which was, the Allowance of traveling from their Abode, to the Place of God's public Worship; then, when they came to be settled in the Land of Canaan, a Sabbath-Day's Journey seems to be all that Space between the farthest Habitation and the nearest Synagogue, or Place of Divine Service: For to me it seems plain, that beside their Synagogues properly so called, they had their Proseuchai, Oratories, or Places of Prayer, to which they did resort, where either they had no Synagogue, or none which they could conveniently reach: But even herein is sufficient Restraint from Labour for all profane Uses, and a Rest in every thing but that Toil they took for the Service of God, for whose Honour they restend, and whose Service their Rest directed to them. Another Command given the Jews, with respect to this Rest, was this; Exod. 35.3. Ye shall kindle no Fire throughout your Habitations upon the Sabbath-day. This some interpret too loosely, some too strictly: Those who think this spoken with respect to the Tabernacle,( of which Mention next follows,) that no Fire should be there made on the Sabbath-Day, to further the Work of it; which, say they, teaches us, that the Work of the Tabernacle was to give place to the Sabbath, I think speak little to the purpose; for it is expressly spoken with respect to their Habitations, not the Tabernacle; nor could the necessary Sacrifices be made without Fire. But this Precept hath certainly a farther Design to ratify and ascertain that Rest which was peculiar to this Day, by which they were put in continual Remembrance of the Creator of Heaven and Earth, whom therefore they ought to serve, and not the Creature; for on other Festival Days( even on the Passover) which related not to this Rest, it was lawful for them not only to kindle Fire, Exod. 16. but to dress Provisions: And yet I cannot but think them too strait-laced, who would not allow so much as the striking Fire out of a Flint; or the feeding a Lamp with a little Oil, though it were in danger of going out. I do not think that it was designed that they should make no Fire if the could was so vehement as might endanger their Health, or incapacitare them for the Service of God; or that it was not lawful to light a Candle to see to red, or perform any other holy Offices, whilst they sat upon some of the former part of their Sabbath, which was Night. But it is plain, that they might not kindle any Fire to dress their Provisions,( but must do it the Day before,) and consequently they might not do it for any Servile, Sordid, or Secular Uses, which might seem to pollute that Rest which was commanded, in Memory of the Almighty's Rest from the Creation. In all which Things we see how carefully this Rest is secured, to be a constant Monitor to them of that God whom they ought to serve. From the Rest of the Day, let us proceed to the Service of it. As a Religious Worship, devout Service, and public acknowledgement of God was fitly intermingled with a Rest from Extra-religious Labours; so it would have seemed incongruous to have restend upon this Account, that God the Creator of Heaven restend from his Labours, and not openly to have given Praise and Glory to him, and profess themselves to be his Servants; especially when the Design of that Rest was to admonish them that they ought to be so, and to engage them to be so. Hence we find the Rest and the Worship joined together; Levit. 23.3. The Seventh Day is a Sabbath of Rest, an holy Convocation. Upon what Account they restend they themselves knew, but it was not so well known to others; and by that the ignorant World might take them to be a sluggish or humoursome People, but could not thence know what God they worshipped and adored: But by their holy Convocation, and their joint Consent in the Worship and Service therein performed, they did openly, in the Face of the World, profess themselves to be Worshippers of the God of Israel, who made Heaven and Earth; and that in opposition to all False Gods, and all the Idolatrous Worship then in vogue in the World. The Heart and secret Practices are known only to God, and by them Men cannot judge; but then is God glorified amongst Men, his Honour and Sovereignty asserted, and others invited to the right Way, when he is publicly acknowledged, and openly worshipped and served in a Way becoming the Majesty of Heaven and Earth: And to with-hold this public Worship, is, at least, to profess ourselves ashamed of him, and, in effect, to renounce and deny him. Hence saith our Saviour, in the Gospel, Mark 8.38. Whosoever shall be ashamed of me, and of my Words, in this adulterous and sinful Generation; of him also shall the Son of Man be ashamed, when he cometh in the Glory of his Father, with the holy Angels. And what in St. Mark is called being ashamed of him, in St. Matthew is called denying of him: Matth. 10.33. Whosoever( saith our Saviour) shall deny me before Men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in Heaven. Upon this Account it is, that the author to the Hebrews exhorts us not to forsake the assembling of ourselves Heb. 10.25. together. Hence also this External Profession is made necessary to our acquiring Happiness; Rom. 10.10. For( saith St. Paul) with the Heart Man believeth unto Righteousness, and with the Mouth Confession is made unto Salvation. And when this is done unanimously and solemnly in public Worship, it proclaims God's Name to the World, gives greater Glory to him, and highly recommends it to the rest of Mankind. But to return to the Law: Another Part of the Service or Worship of that Day, was, the particular Sacrifice thereon to be performed, which immediately after the Establishment of the Daily Sacrifice, we find thus prescribed, Numb. 28.9, 10. And on the Sabbath-Day, two Lambs of the first Year, without Spot, and two Tenth Deals of Flower for a Meat-Offering, mingled with Oil, and the Drink-Offering thereof. This is the Burnt-Offering of every Sabbath, beside the continual Burnt-Offering, and his Drink-Offering. Wherein as we plainly see that the Jews were required to worship God, even with their Substance, in a more plentiful manner on that Day than at other times; so we may here learn,( that I may observe that now by the by,) that the Jewish Sabbath is now abrogated, or rather expired: For if that Sabbath were now in force, the Services wherewith it was commanded to be continually observed, must also be in force; but no Christian now will allow of those Sacrifices, and therefore ought not to insist on that Sabbath. Nor is it to any purpose to allege, that Sacrifices were tied to the Temple at Jerusalem, and that it is now in the Hands of Unbelievers; and that the Jews themselves, when debarred from the Temple, were not bound to sacrifice; for as we are Christians, we do affirm that Temple-Worship itself to have ceased; and that though Jerusalem and the Temple were in our Hands, and entirely in our power, yet we ought not to sacrifice; for so to do, were to aclowledge the Law of Moses to be still in force, and consequently that the messiah was not yet come; which were to overthrow the whole economy of the Gospel, and Salvation by Christ; which is the Argument St. Paul frequently presseth against the Judaizing Christians of his Time, who urged the Necessity of observing the Law of Moses; and which I may have Occasion to use, and more fully explain hereafter. We have considered how this Sabbath ought to be observed, and it may now be to our purpose to consider on whom the Obligation lay, thus to observe it: And we find that it extended to all Jews, of what Rank, Quality or Condition soever; not only to Governors, Rulers, and Masters of Families, but even to Children and Servants; and so far as concerned the Rest of the Sabbath, even to the Stranger that was within their Gates; yea, even to their very cattle. By the Stranger within their Gates, I take to be meant, not only their two sorts of Proselytes, such as had either submitted to their whole Law, and embody'd themselves with them; or else were Favourers of their Religion, but not wholly come up to them; but even all Strangers whatsoever, who came thither by way of travail or Trade, or any manner of Business. These, while they had the Government in their own Hands, they did constrain to rest on that Day, though they did not admit them to their Worship; for to have suffered them to do otherwise, had been to have made them a Scandal and Snare to the Jews: For as their very looseness had been offensive to such as were zealous of God's Honour; so to have permitted them at that time to trade or barter, had been to encourage a strong Temptation to the Jews, who were a People much addicted to their Worldly Advantages, to profane their own Sabbath for Gain. They could not, indeed, help this when they were under the Government of Strangers; but the Command being extended to no other Strangers but such as were within their Gates, under their Protection, and consequently in their Power, and at their Command, it is plain that it was not meant to other Strangers, but only for the Commonwealth of the Jews, and those who were amongst them, and therefore must stand and fall with them; that is, last and continue while that Dispensation lasted, and was in force, and cease when that ceased; and that being now ceased, we must conclude their Sabbath to be so too. But besides God's Resting on the Seventh Day from the Works of the Creation, there is another Reason given for the Jewish Rest; and that is, That that God who made Heaven and Earth, had also with a stretched-out Arm, and with Signs and Wonders, delivered them out of Egypt, where they lived in miserable Slavery, and had brought them into a State of Liberty, Ease and Comfort; and therefore, in Memory of that wonderful Deliverance, and Thankfulness for it, they should not only rest themselves, but permit even their Servants so to do, as remembering that they themselves were Servants in the Land of Egypt. Deut. 5.14, 15. Now this Reason being peculiar to the Jews, and to no other People, it is an Argument that the Sabbath was peculiarly intended for the Jews, and not for others; as indeed, it was to distinguish them from others. Now though this Command did extend to all the Jews, yet not to all alike: The Obligation lay much stronger upon those who( as we say) were sui juris, Disposers of their own Actions, than upon those who were under the Command and Dominion of others; nay, where any, contrary to their own Will and Desire, were compelled by a prevailing Power to labour on the Sabbath, the Obligation of Rest seems to cease, at least so far as to the making them liable to any Punishment or Blame; though it is much otherwise as to them who enforced it. It were a very hard Case, if a Servant, who would rest with all his Heart, and be thankful to his Master for it, should be run all along upon this Dilemma, that he must either incur the Wrath of God if he did labour, or suffer all the ill Usages and Cruelties which a hard-hearted Master could inflict upon him if he did not labour. And therefore we see that a wise and merciful God hath so ordered the Matter, that though the Ease belongs to the Servant, yet that he might not be hindered from it, the Command is directed to the Master, Thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-Servant, nor thy Maid-Servant, &c. The Command is given to those to whom these Sons or Servants did belong; and they were not only to keep the Sabbath themselves, but to be Guardians and Conservators of it as to others. If the Servant indeed did labour of his own Will, it was his own Crime; but if the Master saw or suffered it, it was also his Crime; if he commanded it, it was a double Crime; if he enforced it, was still a higher Crime. The Servant was then as a Tool or Instrument in the Hand of the Master, the Work( which in itself is no Harm) is his, but the Violation of the Command is the Master's; for where the Person to whom the Command is directed, and the Person concerned in the Matter directed, are distinct, the Breath of the Command is always a Crime in him to whom the Command is directed, but not so always to the Person concerned only in the Matter directed. Thus here it is commanded, that not only his Son and his Daughter, his Man-Servant and Maid-Servant, but not so much as his Ox, or his Ass, or any of his cattle, shall do any manner of Work. Now if the Ass had been made to carry a burden, or the Ox yoked and sent to plow, none would accuse them of Sin, though they were certainly guilty who caused it. But perhaps you will say, the Ox and the Ass are not Reasonable Creatures, and therefore not capable of Sin, properly speaking: Nevertheless, they are here concerned in the Matter of the Command. But however, take this farther Instance; It is said, Exod. 22.18. Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live: The Witch is here deeply concerned in the Matter of the Command, but the Direction of it is to the Governor. Now will any Man say, that upon this Command the Witch is bound to hang her self, cut her own Throat, or some Way or other make away her self? It is indeed her Fault that she is a Witch; but it is not her Fault that she lives, though it is the Governor's Fault that he suffers her to live, if he know, and have good Evidence that she is such a kind of Creature. Indeed, no Servant is so entirely a Slave, but that in many Things, and at many Times, he is Disposer of his own Actions; and if in such Case he did pollute the Sabbath, it was his Sin; or if he did freely consent to his Master, commanding the Violation of it, he sinned as well as his Master; but if it was merely by Compulsion, and with Regret and Sorrow of Mind, the Work indeed is the Servant's, which, considered in itself, was not unlawful; but the Crime is the Master's, to whom the Command was given, that it should not be done at such a Time: In this Case the Command is given to the Master, that his Servant shall not work; and therefore is it not the Servant's, but the Master's Crime, if he compel him. But I forbear to prosecute this any farther, because our learned Brerewood, moved thereto by a very afflicting Case, hath handled this Matter so clearly and fully, that he hath scarce left any Gleanings for them who come after him. I am not ignorant that some, whose Zeal out-strips their Knowledge, have not very well relished this Interpretation, and possibly may not yet; but I hope it may go a great way towards qualifying them, and abating their Heat, if they shall please to consider that even the Jews themselves, and their most zealous asserters of their Sabbath, were of this Opinion, That those who were in the Power of others, and by more Force and Compulsion were constrained to any Labour, at other Times innocent, on the Sabbath, did not sin: For if they had accounted it a Sin, they ought to have suffered the most barbarous Cruelties, yea even Death itself, rather than have been guilty of it. Now look upon them in their March, as they were carried away Captive to Babylon, a more tedious Journey than most Islanders are acquainted with; had they then told their Guards, or those who conducted them, and peremptorily stood to it, that on every Seventh Day they would go no farther than a Sabbath-Day's Journey, they would have knocked them on the Head, without more ado, and there had been an End of them; they had ceased to be a People, and many Generations past forgotten: And when they were at Babylon, they were in the Condition of Slaves, at least the greatest part of them, and that for a long Time; for at the last Descent of nabuchadnezzar it is expressly said, 2 Chron. 36.20. That those that had escaped from the Sword, carried he away to Babylon, where they were Servants to him and his Sons, until the Reign of the Kingdom of Persia. And can we think that a People who had little Knowledge, and no Regard of the Sabbath, and withall, had Power of Life and Death over their Slaves, would suffer their Captives, and a People they hated, to be idle, and do them no manner of Service One Day in every Seven? And in their Captivity it seems they had so learned the Trick of this, that at their Return to Jerusalem they turned it to their Worldly Advantage, and traded, carried burdens, trod the Wine-Presses, and did all manner of Work on the Sabbath; in which, doubtless, the Servants were most visible, and had the greatest Share. But when Nehemiah complains of this, and sets himself with all Severity to redress it, he speaks not one Word to the Servants, who laboured under the Hardships of others Power and Covetousness; but lays the Fault upon the Nobles, and makes it all their Doings, who should not have suffered, much less commanded it to have been done. The Servants Actions he makes to be their Crime, Nehem. 13.17, 18. thus; What evil thing( saith he) is this that ye do, and profane the Sabbath-Day? Did not your Fathers thus; and did not our God bring all this Evil upon us, and upon this City? Yet ye bring more Wrath upon Israel, by profaning the Sabbath. It was the Servants did the Work, but he charges the Fault upon the Masters: And doubtless, when they who were commanded not to do any manner of Work themselves on the Sabbath, nor suffer others; when they to whom the Care of the Sabbath was committed, did, on the contrary, promote and enforce the Violation of it; it was not only an high Crime, but an open Contempt of God and his Laws in them; though they whom they used for that purpose, as not being able to help it, might only be as Sufferers in it. There is one Objection of Moment, which I fore-see will be made against this Branch of the Doctrine of the Sabbath: That if under colour of Force, and ill Usage, a Man may do what God has forbidden, it will not only take away all Suffering for Righteousness sake, and so overthrow the Doctrine of the across; but encourage Men to venture upon any Sin, and then to clear themselves by laying it to their Charge who compelled them to it, or in whose Power at least it was so to do. And this Objection seems to be founded upon an undeniable Maxim in Christianity, That we ought not to commit the least Sin, upon the Store of any Force, or any Pretence whatsoever. By Force, I here mean not such an absolute Force as can actually make another do the Evil, for that is not in the Power of Man; but such a Force as can inflict such grievous Pains and Punishments as are not otherwise to be avoided, but by complying with the Will of him who useth it. Now if the Act in this Case could be charged with Sin in the Person so circumstantiated, not approving, and under Force, it would go a great way: But it being what I deny, I now come to clear the Way against this Objection, by showing my Reasons for so doing. First then I say, that the Work or Labour prohibited on the Sabbath-Day, is not simply, and in its own Nature unlawful; as to dress the Vineyard, tread the Wine-Presses, plow the Ground, carry in the Corn, or the like; but are made unlawful at such a certain Time by God's positive Command, which to disobey, is sinful; otherwise, the Thing itself were no Sin; for of Works sinful in themselves we speak not; those are forbidden for their own sakes, not only on the Sabbath, but every where, and at all Times. Secondly, I say, that in positive Commands, the Thing is made sinful in the Person to whom the Command is given, and so far forth as it is given to him, if he transgresses: But the Precept of the Sabbath is not given after the same manner as the other are; for the other, as, Thou shalt not commit Adultery, Thou shalt not steal, are given indifferently, and to all alike; the Command of the Sabbath but is given principally to a Man, as he is Disposer of his own Actions; and next, as he may have Power and Command over others; Thou, nor thy Son, nor thy Daughter, thy Man-Servant, nor thy Maid-Servant, thine Ox, nor thine Ass. So that if it take in the Servant so far as he is in his own Power, yet it is plainly directed to the Master wherein he is in the Master's Power; and all the Reason in the World for it; for as he could not well rest under a troublesone Master, so it was scarce possible for him to repair to the holy Convocation, if his Master would not suffer it. And therefore, Lastly, I answer, That where the Thing is sinful in its own Nature, there a Man ought not to suffer himself to be prevailed on to comply with it by any Allurements, terrors, Force, or Death itself; he ought to suffer the worst that can be, even all the Evils in the World, rather than commit Sin. But when the Thing is not unlawful in itself, but becomes unlawful only by a positive Command, in a Case where that Command reacheth not him, though it may not be commendable, yet it is not sinful: And this is plainly the Case of the Servant on the Sabbath-Day, hindered from pursuing his own good Intentions, by the Power and Severity of his wicked Master. To make this still more plain, I shall set down a double Instance in a Case not unlike: Suppose a Master beats and abuseth his Servant, with Design to make him swear falsely against another, in a Case of pretended Debt, or such like Matter; though he be never so ill used, yet he ought never to comply with his Master's wicked Desire; and if he do,( though never so wronged,) yet he shall stand guilty of Perjury before God, and be convicted of it by Man; it is a Crime which he ought not to commit, though Death itself threatened him: His Sufferings may somewhat alleviate his Crime, but cannot take away the Sin; for it is a Sin in its own Nature, which Circumstances cannot change, though they may lessen; and for it he shall be punished, notwithstanding any Plea of Force. Now on the other hand, Suppose that the Governor of a Place commands, under a certain Penalty, all the Shops in a City to be kept close shut upon a certain Day, for which we will suppose him to have a special Cause, and good Reason, and therefore he ought to be obeied; though otherwise, it had been lawful enough to keep open Shop on that Day: And now suppose that same forementioned Master, in a crossgrain'd Humour, to beat his said Servant, and not leave till he force him to open his Shop, contrary to the Governor's Command. Is not the Case here altered? When the Case comes to be inquired into, whether of the two do you think the Governor would punish; the Master, who caused his Shop to be opened, in Contempt of Authority; or the Servant, who without any dis-respect to the Governor, opened the Shop in Compliance with his Master's Will, to save his own hid? Doubtless the Governor would punish the Master, and pity the Servant; if he did not add to the Master's Punishment, for abusing the Servant. Thus we see that positive Commands in Matters otherwise lawful or indifferent, bind not beyond the Intention of the Law-maker; and therefore Force and Suffering may alter the Case, where it was so intended. And that such is the present Case, may appear from what hath been already said; though even in such Case as this, no Man ought to catch at such Pretences, or act under colour of them, unless he really and actually lye under them. Concerning the Practical Observation of the Sabbath, from Time to Time, among the Jews, it is in general observable, that whilst they devoutly kept the Sabbath, it begot in them such a Reverence of the Divine Majesty, and Sense of their Duty, that it not only preserved them from Idolatry, but from all Enormous Crimes; and therefore, among the Prophets we find the Observation of that most highly extolled, and earnestly recommended, and all Blessings promised to it; as if that included all other Duties, or necessary drew them after it. But when they neglected the Sabbath, they presently fell, not only into Idolatry, but ran headlong into the grossest and vilest Wickedness. So that when the Prophets seem desirous to draw up the highest Charge that can be against them, it is commonly comprehended in this, That they polluted God's Sabbaths, profaned his Sabbaths, hide their Eyes from his Sabbaths, and the like Expressions; as if they would stick at nothing else, when they once dared to do that. The By-turnings are so many, that it is a difficult thing to keep the right Way; and as Men are apt to improve their Notions, so also their practise to Extremes: And thus it was with the Children of Israel, they were very hardly, for a long time, brought to a due and constant Observation of the Sabbath. At first when it was given they could not forbear violating it by going out to gather Manna, even contrary to an express Command: And as soon as it was confirmed, we red of one gathering Sticks on that Day; and though he was by God's special Command publicly stoned to Death for the Fact, yet even that Severity did not effectually work upon them; but even after God had trained and exercised them so many Years, and, as one would have thought, secured them to him by a continued Series of Miracles; yet even just then, when they were ready to enter into the promised Land, this Complaint is made of them, Deut. 32.16, 17. That they provoked him to jealousy with strange Gods, with Abominations provoked they him to Anger; they sacrificed unto Devils, not to God; to Gods whom they knew not, to new Gods that came newly up, whom their Fathers feared not. It was not so very strange that they should grow negligent of the Sabbath in their Captivity,( and yet that Sin was in a great measure the Cause of it, which ought to have made them the more to fear it:) But it was the highest Ingratitude at their Return, to bring that Sin along with them, and persist in the practise of it, as from Nehemiah we learn they did: But when the Noise of the Prophets, continually exclaiming against, and threatening Vengeance for this Sin, had awakened them, and the Care of Rulers had reformed them, and their own heavy Sufferings had convinced them, that Perseverance in that Sin would be their Ruin, then they ran to the other Extreme, observing the Sabbath even nicely and superstitiously, beyond what God required of them; insomuch that in the Time of the Maccabees, when Antiochus Epiphanes sent his Forces against them, who assaulted them on the Sabbath-Day, they would make no manner of Defence; and not only would not cast even a ston at their Adversaries, 1 Macc. 2.36, 37. but would not so much as stop the Places where they lay hide; but cried out, They would die in their Innocency. But by this Means such a lamentable Slaughter was made of them, as made the rest bethink themselves of another Course, who very feelingly argue thus; Vers. 40, 41. If we all do as our Brethren have done, and fight not for our Lives and Laws against the Heathen, they will now quickly root us out of the Earth. And then it follows, At that time therefore they decreed, saying, Whosoever shall come to make battle with us on the Sabbath-Day, we will fight against him; neither will we die as our Brethren that were murdered in the secret Places. And accordingly, we find Jonathan very successfully executing this Decree against Barchides. 1 Macc. 9.36, 37. But if this had not been lawful before, it was not their Decree that could have made it so: And if the Law of the Sabbath had prohibited it, their Decree had been an Interfering with God's Law, and in some measure a Repeal of it. But even this Decree they afterwards weakened by a strait-laced Interpretation, limiting it to Defence, and not Offence; for which also they smarted by Pompey and Titus Vespatian. In our Saviour's Time they were so superstitious, and very jealous of doing ill, or indeed any thing on the Sabbath-Day, that they would not willingly suffer even another to do good on that Day; and therefore they very maliciously quarreled with our Saviour for restoring Sight to the Blind, curing the Lame, and healing the Sick on the Sabbath-day: But our Saviour himself having sufficiently and plainly confuted their Folly herein, I shall not farther insist upon it. Only, hence we may observe, that when Men are restrained from downright Wickedness, and open Violation of God's Laws; yet still they are very apt to entangle themselves in Sin and Folly, even in the Exercise of their Duties; which may warn us to have a watchful Guard upon ourselves, and to use all Diligence to understand our Duties arightly. Having thus far considered what Account the holy Scriptures give us of the Sabbath, there remains one very material Thing still to be inquired into; viz. Of what Continuance it was? Whether Perpetual, or Temporary? And if Temporary, then when and how it determined? Now certainly the Sabbath must run the same Fate with the Law, of which it was a Part. Now the Law was either typical of Christ, or given with respect to him, and his Coming. When therefore our Saviour came, and had fulfilled the Law in all Righteousness, and settled his own Dispensation, or the Way of Salvation by him, the Law then became of no Force; according to that of the Author to the Hebrews, For there is verily a disannulling of the Commandment going before, Heb. 7.18. for the Weakness and Unprofitableness thereof; for the Law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better Hope did, by the which we draw nigh unto God. And when our Blessed Saviour, after his Resurrection, gave his Apostles their full Commission, Matth. 28.19, 20. Go ye therefore and teach all Nations, &c. he therein plainly intimated the Abolishment of the Mosaical Law; for( as the Author to the Hebrews argues) The Priesthood being changed, Heb. 7.12. there is made also of necessity a Change of the Law. Not that the Law was by any particular or special Act expressly abrogated, but that it expired, ceased any longer to oblige, and yielded and gave way to the Evangelical and Unchangeable Law introduced by Christ: For when a Law is made only for a prefixed Time, there needs nothing more for its Abrogation, but the Approach of that Time, and then it ceaseth in course. Indeed, the whole Law, even the Commandments themselves, considered as given by Moses, were not obligatory to the Gentiles then, much less to any since, now that the Law itself is voided: For let a Law be never so just and good, yet as a Law it only binds them to whom it is given. Now the Law was not given to the Gentiles, but to the Israelites, to separate them from the Gentiles: Had it been given to them, they should have been judged by it; but that it neither was, nor should be so, St. Rom. 2.12, 14, 15. Paul plainly teacheth; As many( saith he) as have sinned without Law, shall also perish without Law; and as many as have sinned in the Law, shall be judged by the Law. And again; When the Gentiles, which have not the Law, do by Nature the Things contained in the Law; these having not the Law, are a Law unto themselves; which show the Work of the Law written in their Hearts, &c. And here the Apostle helps us to a Distinction, and clearly teacheth us how the Moral Law, contained in the Ten Commandments, was obligatory to the Gentiles; not by virtue of their being set down by Moses, and given to the Israelites; but as discoverable by the Light of Nature, which would certainly direct them to these Truths, if they did not offer Violence to it: And by this they could not but know the Moral Part of the Fourth Commandment, That God was to be worshipped; and indeed, they did with Universal Consent aclowledge it, though they were woefully mistaken in the manner of performing it. But then as to the Day, or Time, I desire any Man to instruct me how he will discover by the Light of Nature, or where he will find it written in Men's Hearts, That just one Day in Seven, and particularly the exact Seventh Day from the Creation, must be dedicated entirely to that Worship. So that I have often wondered what should have moved some Learned Men to run away with a Notion, that a Seventh-Day-Sabbath, even the Time itself, is Natural and Moral: Not but that I very well approve of the Proportion of Time upon other Reasons, but I like not the Sandy Foundation whereon they build, who while they will needs prove too much, prove just nothing at all. As to the Jewish Sabbath, to assert the Necessity of that, is plainly to relapse from Christianity, and to return to judaisme: For where will they find any Obligation to it, but in the Law of Moses? Now the Apostle saith expressly, Rom. 3.19. that What Things soever the Law saith, it saith to them who are under the Law. For any Man therefore to urge the Necessity of the Jewish Sabbath, is to profess himself under the Law: And what St. Paul said in the Case of Circumcision, will be true in the Case of the Sabbath, Gal. 5.3. that he makes himself a Debtor to the whole Law. For where a Man acknowledgeth himself bound to any one thing by virtue of a Law, by virtue of the same Law he must own himself bound to all it requires. Now what is this, but to seek Salvation by the Law? Whereas St. Paul saith, Gal. 2.16. that By the Works of the Law shall no Flesh be justified. But, which is still worse, by this practise they not only defeat themselves and their own Endeavours, but what in them lies overthrow the Gospel of Christ, and destroy the Merits of his Incarnation, Life, Death, and whatsoever he did for our Salvation: For he that insists upon the Necessity of any Legal Observances, must do it as taking the Law still to be in force; and so must either, with the Jews, deny Christ to be come in the Flesh; or else assert the Insufficiency of his Coming, and his Dispensation for our Salvation, unless joined with, and assisted by Legal Observances; which were to make his Coming to be of little or no Use, and in effect both to deny Salvation by him, and reject it. And this is that fatal Consequence which the same Apostle charges on the practise of the Judaizing Christians of his Time; Gal. 2.21. For( saith he) if Righteousness come by the Law, then Christ is dead in vain. And again; Christ is become of no effect unto you; Ch. 5. v. 4. whosoever of you are justified by the Law, ye are fallen from Grace. Farther; The Jewish Sabbath itself was a Type, the Use of which ceaseth at the coming of the Thing typified. The Deliverance of the Children of Israel out of the Egyptian Bondage by Moses, which was one Thing in Memory whereof their Sabbath was celebrated, was a Type and Pledge of our Deliverance from the Power of Sin and Death by the Coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Their Temporal Deliverance was typical of our Spiritual, which Christ hath wrought. And if their Rest did typify Christ's Resting in the Grave that Day, that is long since performed; and therefore it would be absurd now to use it upon that Account: And if it did typify the Eternal Rest of the Saints in Heaven, it did typify that to be obtained by Christ; and he hath now much better and stronglier assured us of it, than it was possible we could be by Types and Shadows; so that it is now of no Use on that Account. Hence St. Paul saith of the Sabbath, and some other Things, that They are a Shadow of Things to come, but the Body is of Christ. Col. 2.17. Which is to say, that the Obligation and Use of them ceaseth at his Coming. He that will be an Advocate for the Jewish Types, I desire him well to consider how he will avoid being driven to a Necessity of pleading also for their Sacrifices; I doubt the one will draw the other after it; and yet I do not learn that there are any calling themselves Christians, so far deluded as to offer at that; and therefore it is needless to lose Time in writing against it. But to what purpose should I struggle any longer about this Matter, when the holy Scripture hath plainly determined the Case for the Expiration of the Jewish Sabbath? St. Paul reproving and disputing against the Galatians, for adhering to the Prescriptions of the Law of Moses, Gal. 4.10, 11. saith thus; Ye observe Days, and Months, and Times: I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed on you Labour in vain. To have observed any such Days or Times which were set apart for God's Worship, according to the Purity of Christianity, could not have made him afraid of them; but rather would have rejoiced him, in hope of their Perseverance: But it is the Observation of the Jewish Feasts, which he here opposes; which being observed( as they did) with an Opinion of Necessity to Salvation, was inconsistent with the Doctrine of Salvation by Christ alone; which might justly make him afraid of them. Now of these Feasts, their Sabbath was one; and he speaks in general, and excepts none. If the Sabbath had been excepted, it being a Feast so solemn, and recurring so often, certainly some particular Care had been taken of it, that it might not seem to be condemned with the rest: But neither here, nor elsewhere, is there any such Exception. But to put the Matter out of all doubt, the same Apostle expressly names the Sabbath, with the other Festivals; Col. 2.16. Let no Man therefore( saith he) judge you in Meat or Drink,( i.e. Meats or Drinks prohibited by the Law of Moses;) or in respect of any holy Day, or of the New Moon, or of the Sabbath-Days. From whence I think it is evident, that in the Sense and judgement of the Apostle, the Obligation of the Jewish Sabbath was then expired, and Christians were at liberty to observe it no more than another Day; not but that they might take Occasion, in a particular manner to serve and glorify God on that Day; but that they were not to to be censured or condemned as faulty, if they did not look upon themselves as under any Obligation to observe it, as being commanded by the Law of Moses: The Obligation of it was ceased, and it was become to them as a common Day; and as such they might use it, without any Imputation of a Crime. It will readily be acknowledged, nor is it any Prejudice at all to this Doctrine, if it be rightly considered, that we find Christians paying some Deference to the Sabbath for some time after the Resurrection and Ascention of our Saviour; for the Mosaical Law came from the Almighty, though not designed to be everlasting; and had been attested with Signs and Wonders, and therefore it was not to be cast off with Contempt, but decently laid aside; and some Time was to be allowed to win Men off from their rooted Prejudices. But the principal Reason I take to be this, That as our Saviour saith of himself, that he was not sent but to the lost Sheep of the House of Israel, so he recommended that People to the particular Care of his Apostles; and we may observe them so closely labouring with them, that when they were dispersed upon the Persecution, many would preach the Gospel to the Jews only; and there was need of the expense of a Miracle to convince them, that Repentance unto Life was granted to the Gentiles. Acts 11.17, &c. Now the Jews, in their chief and first Care, were rigorous Observers of their Sabbath, and failed not to assemble together on that Day: Where therefore could the Apostles, or any others, so conveniently find them to preach Christ to them, as when they were met at their Synagogues? Upon this Account, you find even St. Paul, the most zealous Assertor of Christian Liberty against Jewish Observances, frequently to enter into the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath-Day, and labour to convert them: Not that he thought himself under any Obligation to keep their Sabbath, but that their Sabbath afforded him an Opportunity more effectually to recommend the Christian Doctrine to them, and thereby to give more Glory to God. And I believe that you will scarce find that the Apostles at any time preached on the Sabbath-Day, but in the same place you will find a Jewish Synagogue; as at Antioch, Thessalonica, Corinth, &c. Acts 13, &c. But though they did preach for their Conversion on the Sabbath-Day, yet that which was peculiar to the Christian Religion,( as the Breaking of Bread, or Administration of the blessed Eucharist,) they did not then, but on the Lord's Day. But when the Obstinacy of the Jews had utterly discouraged the Apostles, and became dangerous to the converted Gentiles, and had perfected the Schism, then all Deference to their Sabbath was totally laid aside: And though that Compliance for a Time( in Tenderness to the Jews, not out of any Conscience to the Day) might beget a Respect for it for a Time, in some Places; yet that soon wore out, and the whole Church of God forbore, if they forbade not, any Observation of the Jewish Sabbath: It is certain some Churches took special Care to forbid it, for fear of its becoming a Snare and Temptation to fall away to judaisme. There is a slight Objection which some offer, Matth. 24.20. That our Saviour bids them pray that their Flight be not in the Winter, nor on the Sabbath-Day. But this is not spoken in Confirmation of their Sabbath, but by way of Prediction of the Miseries that should befall them, and which that very error concerning the Sabbath should make fall heavier upon them; for the Jews were at that time superstitious Observers of their Sabbath, and would choose rather to die than to seem in the least to violate it; and upon that Account quarreled and hated our Saviour; and he knowing their Obstinacy, that they would not be convinced, and fore-seeing and lamenting their Destruction, bids them pray that their Flight might not be on the Sabbath-Day, because their error concerning it would bring the greater Destruction upon them; for if they obstinately refused to fly farther than a Sabbath-Day's Journey, commonly reputed at most not above two Miles, they must unavoidably fall into the Hands of their Enemies, and consequently be all either slain, or made Slaves; which accordingly happened under Titus Vespatian; and they then paid sufficiently for that error, and their Obstinacy in it. Thus these Objections being answered, I think the foregoing Arguments may prove to any impartial considerate Man, that from and after the Resurrection of our Saviour the Obligation of the Jewish Sabbath ceased to them, and to all others, if it ever obliged any others. CHAP. III. Of the Lord's Day. THE Sabbath, as a Mark of judaisme, being dismissed to keep company with the Law of Moses, if we find not out some stated Time which Christians are bound to consecrate or set apart to the Worship, Honour and Service of God, we shall leave them in that respect in a worse Condition than the Jews; for one Reason of God's instituting the Sabbath among the Jews, seems to be to prevent that Neglect, and in the End total Failure of his true Worship, which happened to the Old World, when the set Times of his Worship seem to have been left to the Gratitude, Discretion and good Inclinations of Men, which were soon over-born by their Corruptions. And though Christians have stronger Motives, and more manifold Obligations to continue firm and steadfast in the Worship of God, than either the Old World, or the Jews; yet they have the same Corruptions, evil Propensities of Nature, and Variety of bewitching Temptations to withdraw them from it; and therefore the like Helps and Restraints seem to be no less necessary for them, than the Jews: And accordingly, upon the Expiration of the Jewish Sabbath, we find the Lord's Day set apart for the Christian Worship, and that celebrated by Christians with an universal Consent. It were more for our Comfort and Advantage, religiously to observe the Lord's Day in the true Worship of God, than to perplex our Minds with nice Speculations, and intricate Controversies about it: But since the subtle or perverse Wits of Men have and do trouble the World with these Matters, it is become requisite and needful to clear the Way, as far as we can, from these Disputes, that so we may fall quietly and comfortably to the practise of our Duties. The first and great controversy is, Upon what Authority the Observation of the Lord's Day is founded? Some who are very zealous for the Sabbath,( as they call it,) will have it to be a Translation of the Jewish Sabbath; and perhaps they may mean well, but their Position is dangerous and incongruous; for to make the Lord's Day a Translation of the Sabbath from the Jews, were to fetch its original Authority from the Jewish Dispensation; which were a great Disparagement to the Gospel, and would endanger the inclining Men to a Return to judaisme. Neither do they consider that the Sabbath was so proper to the Jews, that it was not translatable from them to the Christians, and to the Lord's Day; for as to the Day or Time, their Sabbath was on the Seventh Day from the Creation, or Last Day of the Week; the Lord's Day is on the First Day of the Week, being the Eighth from the Creation in one respect, and the First of it in another. Now Now these Times, considering their Habitudes, are fixed and immovable: You cannot translate the Seventh Day from the Creation into the Eighth from it, or the First of it; or if they could do this as easily as they have a Mind to it, yet where is their Authority for it? or who was it that did it? And then as to the Services of the Day, neither are they capable of being translated to the Christian economy, as being not compatible to it, nor agreeable with it: As for the Temple-Sacrifices proper to that Day, I suppose none will dispute it; and as for the Service of the Synagogue, it is so appropriated to the Jewish State, that if we were tied up to that, it would rather be a Prejudice to Christianity, than any Promotion of it: So that here is nothing to be translated. In short, Reasons of Equity and Analogy ●ay in some Cases be drawn from the Law, which may persuade, not enforce: But the State of the Gospel is a more perfect and complete State than that of the Law; this weak, insufficient of itself, and expired; that of the Gospel strong, sufficient of itself, and unchangeable; so that it needs not to borrow any Authority from the Law for settling any Constitutions proper to it, as being sufficiently furnished with Authority of its own. The Jewish Sabbath therefore being abolished or expired with the Law, we in this Case are no farther to consider it, or its Authority; but are to look on the Celebration of the Lord's Day as a new Institution, adapted to the Evangelical State; and the Authority for it we are to find there, which is the Thing we are now to inquire after. All except Judaizing Christians, to whom Answers have been already given, do aclowledge the Celebration of the Lord's Day to stand upon Authority sufficiently obligatory to all who have given up their Names to Christ. But whether that Authority be Divine or human, Ecclesiastical or Civil, there is no small controversy. The Laying down of Truth will be the Discovery of error; and therefore I shall neither trouble myself nor others with a distinct Examination of their several Opinions, but in pursuance of my Design, shall content myself with an Enquiry after what Grounds we find for it in the holy Scriptures, and the practise thereupon. In the mean time, as I do think it a very pious and laudable Course for Christian Governors, whether Ecclesiastical or Civil, to encourage and enforce any Parts of Christianity by human Laws; so on the other hand, I apprehended it to be a Thing of very dangerous Consequence to found the Observation of the Lord's Day upon any human Authority; for if it have no better a Support, but subsists merely by virtue of that, by the same Authority the Day may be altered, or the Proportion of Time chang● 〈◇〉 it may be abrogated, and wholly laid aside; which were to subject the public Worship of God, and the open acknowledgement of ourselves to be Christians, to the unsteady Will of Man, which certainly God never intended to do: And for this Cause I am unwilling to set the Observation of the Lord's Day upon any other Authority than what is Divine. But now when we come to make a Search after this Authority, it must be confessed, that express direct written Precept we have none for it: If any Person can show me such a thing, I shall be very glad of it, and thankful for it; but for my own part I could never yet find it. It remains therefore that we search and try whether we can find any thing that tantamounts to it, or comes near it, or is otherwise convincing that it was originally by Authority Divine: And if there be sufficient Grounds or Reasons from Scripture and practise, thereupon to persuade us that it was by Direction, Order or Command of the Apostles to all Christians in all Ages, it will hardly be doubted but that they were directed by the Spirit of God in what they prescribed of such standing and universal Use; and therefore, that the Observation of it proceeded from, and stands by a Divine Authority: And what Motives, Reasons or Grounds there are for this, we shall now examine with what Brevity and Clearness we can. The Scriptures, though they recite not the Precept, or Original Institution, yet they give us fair Intimations of it, and( as I may call them,) such formal Examples, as may make us reasonably believe that such a thing was done: And though several Texts seem to look this Way, yet there are three which speak most directly to this Matter: That the Lord's Day, or Day immediately following the Jewish Sabbath, is meant in every one of them, I shall take for granted, because others have so cleared that Matter beyond all question, that I think it not worth disputing. The Texts I shall take in order, as they lye: The First speaks thus; Acts 20.7. Upon the First Day of the Week, when the Disciples came together to break Bread, Paul preached unto them, &c. As to which Words, you may first observe the Day, the First Day of the Week, i.e. the Lord's Day; and next, that this is mentioned as the Time when they usually assembled, as a Time known to them, and used by them; and therefore must proceed from some Order or Directions: Thirdly, The Business of the Day, To break Bread, i.e. to receive the holy Sacrament of Christ's Body and Blood. Whereby you see, that though the Apostles then often went into the Synagogues on the Sabbath-Day, laying hold of the Occasion of the Meeting of the Jews, to preach to them for their Conversion; yet the Christians met together on the Lord's Day, for the Exercises peculiar to Christianity. Fourthly, That this, as an usual Time of their meeting together, gave St. Paul the Opportunity to preach to them; for he called them not together, but they assembled as of Use and Custom, or a Time known and appointed for that purpose. Now it can hardly be imagined how this could be, unless there had been some Order made, some Rule or Direction given, which was known to all. The Second Text is this; 1 Cor. 16.2. Upon the First Day of the Week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, &c. Now though the direct Design of this Precept be the making Provision for the Poor, and the raising a a Stock in readiness by them upon all Occasions for that purpose; yet the manner of raising this Provision is directed to, by laying up something for that End every First Day of the Week, which is the Lord's Day; and that as on a Day whereon Christians assembled for the Worship and Honour of God, and so was the most likely Time to incite them to liberal and cheerful Giving and the fittest Time that could be appointed for that purpose: For if the Jews were commanded not to appear before the Lord empty, certainly it is more unreasonable for the Christian, whether commanded or not, to do so: And the Christians being directed to the constant practise of this on this Day, without farther Notice or Explanation, but bare naming it, 'tis plain that it must needs be well known to them all, and consequently that they must have had some Rule concerning it. The Third is in these Words, relating to the Behaviour of St. John on that Day; Rev. 1.10. I was in the Spirit on the Lord's Day, and behind me a great Voice, as of a Trumpet. The Trumpet very well becomes the Solemnity of the Day; for amongst the Jews they were accustomend not only to call solemn Assemblies, but to recommend, celebrate and set off solemn Days with the Sound of Trumpets: And St. John, though in Banishment, where he had neither Associate of his Devotions, nor Testimony of his Actions, yet very carefully observes this Day, employing himself in Spiritual Exercises,( for so is his being in the Spirit most commonly understood;) and God approves it by adding a Solemnity thereto, the Sound of the Trumpet, and showing farther Favours to so diligent a Servant.( Or if those Words, as some think, refer to the Inspiration of the Holy Ghost enabling St. John to writ the prophesy contained in that Book; yet being done on that Day, and with respect to the Religious Exercises on that Day, whereby Men are better qualified for the Reception of the Grace and Favours of God, it still more strongly confirms our Assertion.) And as in every one of these Texts is plainly to be seen the Observation of the Lord's Day, so in all of them together we have the whole Business of the Day; in the First, the solemn Offices of the public Worship; in the Second, those Acts of Compassion, Charity and Goodness, which upon meet Occasions, but then especially, are to be exercised towards our Neighbours; and in the Third, those Private Devotions, and holy Employments, wherein Christians may exercise themselves when either the public Worship is over, or they are denied the Use of it. There are several other Considerations which may induce a modest Christian Temper to look upon the Observation of the Lord's Day as a Divine Institution, which I shall now farther pursue. Indeed, the Proportion of Time hath been warmly( I am unwilling to say idly) disputed: I believe it will be very difficult for any Man, how great soever his Confidence may be, to give a natural Reason, why rather One in Seven, than One in Five, or One in Ten, must of necessity be observed; but then I think it would be very unreasonable and ungrateful in Christians, whose State and Blessings are far superior to those of the Jews, if they should abridge God in this Particular, and allow less Time for his Worship than they did: And when God himself did set a Proportion of One in Seven to those who were once his People, it looks like strange Arrogance in Man to think he can assign a fitter Proportion than God hath done: And I think that it ought to be of some Weight with us, that our Church, by enjoining the Fourth Commandment to be red every Lord's Day, doth approve the Proportion of One in Seven; for that she commands it not to be red, as making the Jewish Sabbath obligatory, is plain; for she commands the Levitical Law to be red, either as showing what was then binding, or what Care God took of his People under his several Dispensations, or that Reasons of Analogy and Equity might be thence drawn for our Service, or to show what better Things God hath done for us, or the like Causes; but is at the same time so far from taking it to be now binding, that she looks on such practise as unlawful; nor doth she account any thing binding as purely given to the Jews, unless other Reasons now enforce it: And farther, her practise shows that the Commandment is not red in that Sense; for she not only observes not that Day, but condemns the Observation of it, as a Desertion of Christianity, and Running into judaisme. That Command therefore must be supposed to be red in the general, not the legal Notion of it; i.e. to support the Worship of God, to allow of One Day in Seven for it; which, to avoid Uncertainties, she hath fixed on the Lord's Day. But then if we suppose that Day of Divine Institution, there is an End of all other Disputes, for then it will stand by a Divine positive Right; and when God commands, Obedience is then our Part without more ado. Let us now consider the Reasons for which this Day was made choice of, as best adapted to the Christian Worship. Now it is agreed on all Hands, and it is evident from holy Scripture, that our Blessed Saviour arose from the Grave, thereby triumphing over Death and Hell, on the First Day of the Week, which, in Memory of his Resurrection, is called the Lord's Day: And as his Resurrection doth suppose his Incarnation, Life and Death; so was it necessary in order to his Ascention, and Sitting at the Right Hand of the Father, there to make Intercession for us. On this Day then was not only completed the Work of our Redemption, but all the Parts of that Mystery have some Dependence on, or Relation to what was done on this Day: Then was the Law fulfilled; then was God's Justice satisfied; then was Hell and Death overcome; then were we reconciled to God in Christ Jesus, if we embrace him by Faith, and frame our Lives by his Rules. And what fitter Day for Christian Worship, than that whereon the whole Mystery of Christianity was accomplished? What can more inspire us with Zeal and Devotion, raise our Affections, quicken our Gratitude, and more effectually prompt us to a ready and willing, as well as a reasonable Service, than the Memory of that Performance which entitles us to Forgiveness of Sin, and Everlasting Life; and makes us capable of all those invaluable Benefits and Blessings which either here or hereafter we hope for as Christians? Upon this Account therefore no Day could be more proper for the Christian Worship than this. Another Reason why this Day was made choice of for the Christian Worship, was, That thereon was the Descent of the Holy Ghost, qualifying the Apostles for the Conversion of the World, and the Recovery of Mankind out of that otherwise inevitable State of Perdition and Misery; instructing them in all Truth necessary to our Salvation, and empowering and enabling them to teach it to all others, and conferring those Graces and Abilities which enable us to lay hold of it: For though Christ had perfected the Work of our Redemption and Salvation in itself; yet had we been left to the Guidance of our own corrupt Understandings and crooked Wills, and laid open to all the wil●ss and Delusions of Satan, and not assisted by the Directions and Graces of the Holy Spirit to led us to that Salvation so purchased by Christ, without doubt we should still have failed of obtaining it. And what could more powerfully excite our Zeal, Devotion and Thankfulness to Almighty God and our Blessed Saviour Christ Jesus, than the Memory of these inestimable Benefits? And consequently, What Time more fitly appropriated to the Christian Worship, than that whereon these Blessings and Benefits were first communicated to Christians? But though this be a grand additional Reason to all of us, yet was it not the primary Reason on which the Observation of the Lord's Day was founded; for when the Work of our Redemption was fully wrought, and thereby the Jewish economy dissolved, and the Obligation of their Sabbath ceased, that there might be no Failure for want of a fixed Time of Worship, soon after the Resurrection, and before the Descent of the Holy Ghost, we find the Christians celebrating the Lord's Day, as a Day of public Worship: So that the Institution of it may be reasonably supposed to be amongst those Directions and Instructions which our Saviour gave to his Disciples in those Forty Days he was conversant with them between his Resurrection and Ascention; for he then commanded them, Luk. 24.49. that they should tarry in the City of Jerusalem till they were endowed with Power from on high. And in another place, Acts 1.4. That they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the Promise of the Father. In both which is meant, their attending there the Coming of the Holy Ghost: In order whereunto, we find them, with other Christians, assembled, not casually, but as at a known Time, and with a joint Obedience, on the Lord's Day; and the Acts of Christian public Worship, there expressly mentioned: So that there is Reason to believe that the Time, as well as Place, might be assigned by our Saviour; and that they were fore-warned that the Descent of the Holy Ghost should be on the Lord's Day; which could not be so reasonably expected, nor solemnly performed at accidental Meetings. I confess, our Translation is not so clear in this Matter, in saying that it was when the Day of Pentecost was fully come: Acts 2.1. But with due Submission I do say, that this rendering doth not reach the true and full Sense of the Original, which ought rather to be translated in these or such like Words, When the Day of Pentecost was completed, ended, or fully over; which it was when the First Day of the Week, or Lord's Day began. From all which it seems evident to me, that the Observation of the Lord's Day was known before before the Descent of the Holy Ghost, and consequently known and prescribed from the very Beginning of Christianity. And here I think it ought not to be omitted, That the Observation of the Lord's Day is the Badge of our common Christianity; and is as much a Sign, Mark and distinguishing Character of us Christians from all others, as the Observation of the Sabbath was of the Jews. Christ hath required that we openly confess him before Men: And in Observation of the Lord's Day we do most solemnly confess him, and profess ourselves to be his Followers, i.e. Christians. And hereby we are distinguished, not only from Jews and Mahometans, who are either among us, or border on us; but from all others wheresoever, or of what Persuasion soever: For none will observe that Day, or at least not in Christian Exercises, but those who profess themselves Christians, but distinguish themselves by some other solemn Observation; as the Jews, by keeping their Sabbath on our Saturday; the Mahometans, by solemnizing our Friday. And by such Observations they are known what they are; or must discover what they are, if the Reason of such Observation be asked them: For, ask a Mahometan why he observes Friday? and he will give you a Reason from the Precept of his Prophet,( as he calls him;) and that in so doing, he acknowledgeth himself obliged to the Observance and Profession of the Law of Mahomet, that notorious Impostor. Ask a Jew why he observes the Sabbath, which is our Saturday? and he will tell you that Moses their Law-giver so commanded him; and that thereby he openly professeth himself to be bound to observe all those Rites, Ceremonies and Laws which God, by Moses, commanded them; the Obligation of which, his Blindness or Obstinacy will not let him see to have been long since expired and dissolved. And ask a Christian why he observes the Lord's Day? and he must tell you that he doth it in Memory of Christ's Resurrection, who thereby completed the Work of Redemption; and that in so doing we own ourselves to be Christians, and expect Eternal Salvation by what he hath done for us, in a due Use of those Means he hath prescribed to us: And this Reason I think may excite all Men, as they would profess themselves Christians, and hope for the Benefits of so being, to a constant and diligent Observation of the Lord's Day. And if what hath been told me be true, I cannot but judge it an unsufferable Dishonour and Prejudice to our common Christianity, that the Idolatrous People in some remote Countries observing some of our Merchants not to observe the Lord's Day, or any Religious Feasts or Fasts, have judged them to be worse than themselves, even to be of no Religion at all: For they could not believe them to be of any Religion, who did not own it in some solemn Observation. Perhaps they might want Ministers, or their Number might be few, or their Stay short; but however, they might have honoured the Lord's Day, and professed their Christianity in such solemn Religious Exercises, as in their private Capacities they were able to perform: And I think there ought to be Care and Caution that such Things be not suffered, if the Information be found to be true. We have now seen that in the Observation of the Lord's Day we openly profess ourselves to be Christians; that in it we celebrate the Memory of Christ's Resurrection, when he completed the Work of our Redemption; as also the Descent of the Holy Ghost, to furnish the Church and its Members, in their several Stations, with all Powers and Graces, to assist and led them in the Way of Truth: And farther, that it was observed in the very earliest Times of the Apostles, immediately after the Resurrection, and that when the great Praise of of Christians was, Acts 2.42. that they continued steadfastly in the Apostles Doctrine. And why then should we not think this to be a Doctrine of the Apostles? To this may be added the Universal practise of the Church of Christ; for what Opinion soever they might have as to some Days or Times in some particular Places, yet this was received and observed from the very Beginning, by all, in all Places, and in all Ages. And whence could this proceed, but from our first Instructors in Christianity? Or how could it prevail without their Authority? If therefore we find in Scripture the practise allowed, but an express Precept not set down, we may reasonably refer it to such Practical Regimental Institutions, the practise whereof was sufficient to mention without an express Precept; because it was known to all, and could not be lost or forgotten, as being incumbent on all Christians, at all Times, and in all Places, to keep it up without Intermission, for the Profession of their common Christianity. And it was the unanimous Opinion of all the pious Fathers of the Church, That what was universally received by all Christians, in all Ages and Places, was at first delivered to them: Which if we do not admit, I fear we shall be at a Loss in many Things; for it may be useful not only upon this and the like Accounts, but also undeniably to prove the true Sense of many Texts and Precepts of Scripture, which wrangling Seducers pervert, to the deceiving of many weak and well-meaning Persons. As for instance: Many deny Baptism to Infants; and some have offered at withholding the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper from Women: And though the generality of the Precepts are enough to satisfy any sober Man, and the Parity of Reason between Baptism and Circumcision sufficient to convince any sensible Man in that Point; yet obstinate Men, who make a Trade of Deluding, will not leave bawling, but insist upon little Quirks, and vain Niceties: But when it shall appear that those truly zealous Primitive Christians, who lived so near the Apostles Time, as best to understand their meaning, and were not suffered to practise their Precepts in any other Sense than they were meant, did not deny their Children a Right to Baptism, nor Women to the Lord's Supper, but administered Baptism to the one, and the Lord's Supper to the other; it must be acknowledged that the Precept of Baptism was intended to extend to the Children of Believing Parents, and that of the Lord's Supper to Women. If any object to me for this, that I seem a Favourer of Traditions, let him know that I am as much an Enemy of those new Inventions, and superstitious Devices, which some would obtrude upon us under the Notion of Traditions, as he, or any Man whatsoever; and do think that nothing can be more dangerous and mischievous to the Christian Religion, than to suffer such Novelties and Abuses to be foisted in among us; and for that Reason shall be as ready as any other, upon just Occasion, to appear against them. But if any Man can produce me a practise plainly allowed in holy Scriptures, highly useful or necessary for Christians in all Ages, founded upon Reasons peculiar to our Religion, and embraced by all Christians in all Ages and Places,( such as is this which I contend for,) I shall never think it my Business to oppose it. But perhaps some will say that all Institutions, Directions and Practices of the Apostles are not eternally obligatory, but according to the Subject-Matter or Nature of the Thing, are either temporary and mutable, or eternal and immutable: And for this and some other Reasons, some have made it a Question, whether the Day be not alterable, or the Worship may not be transferred to another Day? As to the Worship itself, it is Moral and Unchangeable, and to some Day it ought to be fixed; for to remove it from all Days, were to destroy the Worship itself; and to leave it arbitrary, were little better. But then, as it is affixed to this or that particular Day, it stands by a positive Right; and how great soever may be the Motives to prefer one Day before another, yet what is by positive Right, is in its own Nature alterable; for it is plain that all the positive Laws of the Jews were not only altered, but disannulled: And I see no Reason, but that any positive Law may be altered or annulled, at the Will of the Lawmaker; the plain Consequence whereof is this, That the Observation of the First Day of the Week, which we call the Lord's Day, is in its own Nature alterable; but then, whether God will, or Man can alter it, is another Question, which more concerns us to inquire after, because the Performance of our Duty in a great measure depends thereon. That God never will alter it, we have all the Reason in the World to believe; for if we look for that, we must expect new Revelations, and new Miracles to attest and vouch those Revelations; which we ought not in this Matter to do, because we are under the last Dispensation; and God hath declared, that he hath fully revealed his Mind and Will concerning the Salvation of Man, and what he requires of him in order thereto. And to me it also seems out of doubt, that neither any Man, or any Body of Men, can alter it: For what Man, or particular Church, shall attempt to alter what hath been received down from the Apostles Times, in all Ages, and all Churches, without being condemned of intolerable Insolence, and bold Usurpation upon the Rights of others, if not also upon the Laws of the Gospel, and running all into Confusion? And as for the whole Christian Church, dispersed over the Face of the Earth, as Matters are, how is it possible they should unanimously agree in such a thing? Or if such a thing should be thought on, what Reason could they give for fixing on another Weekly Day for the common Profession of our Christianity, distinct from all our Christian Fore-Fathers; and so madly distinguishing the following Christians from the foregoing? Or, What better Reason can they show to pitch upon any other Day than the Lord's Day, wherein we apparently celebrate the Memory of our Saviour's Resurrection, and the Descent of the Holy Ghost; and therein, of all the Mercies, Blessings and Favours which we either have or hope for as Christians? Or if they should pretend to some Reasons, yet would not their Authority itself be called in question, and so all Places filled with unnecessary Disputes, and riotous Disorders? For these, and other Reasons which might be given, I do think that the Observation of the Lord's Day ought inviolably to be continued till the Consummation of all Things, and the Lord himself shall come to judge the Quick and the Dead. Concerning the Name or Names of the Day, many are very peevish and troublesone: Some even dote upon the Word Sabbath, whilst others are as averse to it: And I must confess, that I myself am not very fond of the Word Sabbath in this Case, not only as it is a Word appropriated to the Jewish economy, and never used in Scripture but with reference thereunto; but also because those who perniciously insist upon it, usually draw their Obligation from the Jewish Law, and also seem desirous thence to justify their overrigid, if not superstitious Practices and Observations upon it; thus endangering to led both others and themselves into judaisme, which by Christians ought to be carefully avoided. However, if we can agree upon the Thing, I will quarrel with no Man about Words; and if by Sabbath they mean no more than what some, in Contradistinction to the Jews, have called the Christian Sabbath, i.e. the Christian Worship on the Lord's Day, constituted in the Christian Church, I shall no more find fault with them, than with some others, who without any evil Intention, may call it Sunday, according to our common Distinction of the Days of the Week; though I do think that the Lord's Day sounds best in a Christian Mouth. As to the Exercises on the Day, and Manner of its Celebration, but especially as to Recreations, there have been and are so very great Heats, that it is odds but that he who meddles therewith shall feel the one or the other, if not both Parties, fall foul upon his Bones. But having gone thus far, I shall adventure on; and if I get a Knock for my Pains and Good Will, I shall take it as patiently as I can. And in the first place, Great Heed ought to be taken to the solemn and public Worship; that all who profess themselves Christians, especially all those whose Actions are in their own Power and Disposal, do conscientiously attend all along, and join therein with a holy Devotion, and Christian Zeal: And at such Times, no idle Loitering up and down, no Recreations, Sports, Worldly Business, or vain Actions, keeping from it, are in any wise to be allowed: For, being the Day is dedicated, not only to the Honour and Worship of God, but also appointed to this End, that we might openly profess ourselves Christians; in these or any other indecent Courses, to abstain from the solemn Worship, is not only to affront God and his Worship, but amounts to a kind of tacit or implicit Renunciation of our Christianity, which we are peculiarly bound at that time publicly to profess. I urge this the rather, that if possible I might rectify the Mistake of some Persons, who seem to look upon the Lord's Day as little other than a Day of Idleness, and Relaxation from common Business; and not considering the great Ends for which it was instituted, are insensible of the great Sin they run into by a Neglect, if not Contempt of the Duties required thereon. I deny not but that there are several Cases wherein a Man may lawfully absent from the public Worship, so that it be never done with any wilful Neglect or Slighting thereof. If a Man lye dangerously sick, God who sends the Impediment, sends the Excuse; a Man is not bound in such Case to run the apparent Hazard of his Life, which God hath entrusted him with, that by all lawful Ways he might preserve it, to be employed in his Service, and to his Glory: But if a Man's Sickness have been the Effects of his own Wickedness and Disorderliness, he ought to look upon it as God's judgement for his Sin, and account himself the Cause of his Inability to perform those Duties which he ought; and ought therefore hearty to bewail it, and firmly resolve to be more diligent for the future, if it please God to restore him: Nor ought every little Illness or Indisposition keep us from the solemn Worship, such as we are more likely to find Relief from, through God's Mercy, in the diligent Attendance on his Worship, than in the Neglect of it. If a Man be in such Places where he cannot communicate in the public Worship without Sin, he is not bound to join in sinful Communion, but rather to avoid it; but then he ought to make it up what he can, by doing all he is able in his private Capacity. If as I am going to the public Worship, I should see my Neighbour's House on fire, and my Help seem necessary or requisite, I may stay and do all I can to quench it, and prevent my Neighbour's Ruin, or great Loss. If I know of a Conspiracy against a Man's Life, which is likely to take effect, if not prevented at that time, and it is in my power to prevent it, I think I not only may, but ought to omit going to the public Worship at that time, that I may defeat such great Mischief and Wickedness. In short, Whatsoever great Good may be done, or Evil prevented, the Opportunity of doing which would be for ever lost, if not laid hold on at that time, I take to be a just Excuse for absenting from the public Worship for that time. But then these Cases are rare, and are far from being a Warrant to absent at other Times; neither ought we to make that a Reason for doing a Thing at that time, which may be done at another time; neither ought we to shelter our Neglect under any false or feigned Pretences, nor set up any but what are real. And yet beside such rare Cases, there is also a common Case arising from the common Necessities of Mankind; when some stay at home, especially in great Families, either to provide for the rest, who are at the public Worship, or else to be a Safeguard to the House and Goods in it; for the Lord's Day is a Festival, a Day of Joy and Gladness, wherein, according to our Ability, and soberly, we ought to cheer our selves, and comfort the Poor; which cannot be, unless fitting Provision be made for it; and to leave a House well furnished, without any Care, were not only a Temptation, but an Invitation to Thieves to break in and steal: And those who thus stay away, seem not to stay withwithout some reference to the public Worship, they being either the Providers for, or the Security of those who are at it: But then Care ought to be taken that such Persons may either be at the public Worship one part of the Day, or others may take it in Turns with them, as shall be most convenient; lest in time such Omission should grow into an Irreligious Temper, or Habitual Neglect. As for the remaining part of the Day, which is not taken up in the public Worship, I know not how it can be better spent, according to our Strength and Ability, than in doing good to others, and exercising ourselves in Acts of Devotion and Piety, in Meditation, Reading and Prayer, and all such Exercises as tend to the better Information of our Understandings, and the quickening our Wills and Affections in the Performance of Religious Duties, and the begetting in us a Love to them; and all this according to every Man's State and Condition of Life: For some Things are more suitable to single or private Persons, others to those who are Masters or Governors of Families; the one may be swallowed up with his private Devotions, which if the other should be, he might give Occasion to his Family to neglect their Duties, or( which is worse) afford them Opportunity to run Riot. A Conscientious Care, with Respect had to his State and Condition will in course led every Man to what is proper to be done in this Case: But the great controversy is concerning Works and Recreations, and whether any; and if any, then what are lawful? As to the first of these, It is observable that the Jewish Sabbath and the Lord's Day are founded upon different Reasons; theirs respected God's Rest from the Works of the Creation; and that Rest was so interwoven with their Service, that it was an Essential Part of their Worship; was typical, and enjoined them for special Reasons,( as hath been already shewed;) and was so strict, that they looked upon the Killing the Sacrifices and Circumcision, though both commanded by God, to be in some sort a Violation of that Day; mat. 12.5. as may appear from our Saviour's Reasoning with the Jews. But the Lord's Day hath for its principal Reason, the Resurrection of our blessed Saviour, and so seems to be founded rather upon Action than Rest, but yet upon such Action as is Religious; by which Means a Rest accidentally appertains to it, as requiring a Cessation from all such Labours and Employments as are any ways dishonourable to, or inconsistent with the Worship and Service of the Day. That those Works which are unlawful at all Times, are much more unlawful at this Time, I suppose every one will grant: But we are farther to consider, that this is a Day dedicated to God, and set apart for his Service; and therefore it is not to be profaned with the common Work of other Days: It being his Day, we must do his Work, not our own; and this will oblige us to desist from the Use and Exercise of all gainful Employments, whereby we pursue our own Interest and Profit, and not God's Glory; and though they may not be directly opposite to it at other Times, yet they seem to be so at this, because they are a Hindrance to God's Worship, and justle it out, and take its place. Indeed, I think a greater Latitude ought to be allowed to those Employments which provide for the Necessities of Life, especially with respect to Persons in such Circumstances that they cannot well be otherwise supplied; for Christianity doth not teach us to be cruel and inhuman. But here I would put in two Cautions; First, That those who do use such Employments at such Time, do it not with respect to Profit and Worldly Interest; but be content rather to make themselves Savers than Gainers, as acting then upon a Principle of Charity, not of Trade, as at other Times. Secondly, That the Supplies they afford be for Necessity or Refreshment, not for Disorder or Riot. If any Man be so rigorous as to disallow this, I desire him to consider when he sends his Provisions( perhaps out of a scrupulous Humour of doing it by himself, or at home) to the Baker or Cook to be dressed, whether he do not, according to this his Opinion, occasion and indeed tempt them to sin, and so become guilty himself of the Sin for which he condemns others? If we consider not the Propensities of Men, but the bare Thing itself, any one would think that the straight and middle Way were the easiest, as well as the safest; but Experience confutes us, and we find that it is very difficult for Men to forbear turning aside to the one or the other Extreme. Yet, in short, though Devotionary Acts, and such as directly tend to the acknowledgement and Worship of God seem most proper for the Day, yet other good Works are not improper; and there may be Room for both, without Injury to either; and therefore no sober Men ever denied the Lawfulness of Works of Necessity and Mercy on that Day. And hence it is observable, that our blessed Saviour did many of his miraculous Cures on the Jewish Sabbath, in the very Face of the Pharisees, who for that judged him a Sabbath-breaker; but he stopped their Mouths with this unanswerable Reason, amongst others, Matth. 12.12. That it is lawful to do well on the Sabbath-Days: And if we followed the Example of our Saviour in doing good, rather than that of the Pharisees in censuring others, we should have the Lord's Day better kept, and more Good done. It will be a very ticklish Point to discourse of any Recreations on that Day; for some are severe to that Extremity, that they will neither allow any, nor suffer them to be name on that Day; and yet( if they could have Patience to hear themselves told of it) their practise shall at the same time condemn their Opinion. I have known some who have been so scrupulous, that when the public Worship was over, they would scarce stir out of their Doors, nor suffer any others; and yet would find a Time on that Day to discourse and contrive all their Worldly Affairs for the Week following, or else employ a great part of it in censuring and reviling their Neighbours, and thereby infecting their whole Family with a proud censorious Humour; which I take to be Time every jot as ill spent, as if some of it had been allowed to harmless Recreations. For my own part, I should be highly pleased to see any Man arrive at that pitch of Spirituality, that he could proceed the whole Day in a continued Exercise of strict Acts of Devotion and Piety: But then I think the better any Man is, the more charitable and compassionate he is to others; and will be willing to trial them on as he can, and as is most likely to make them better Proficients. If we lay a strong Man's burden upon a Child, he will sink under it: Nor do we expect that from a young Apprentice, which we do from an Artist; nor from every Artist alike. And if we consider the Generality of Christians, we may observe not only that the Body hangs as a Clog upon the Soul, but that the Soul itself is not sufficiently qualified and strengthened to persevere long in an uninterrupted Course of Spiritual Exercises; but that in many, perhaps in the best, though the Spirit be willing, yet the Flesh sometimes is so weak as not to be able to hold out; and to force them beyond their Strength, would be to make them faint and languid; yea, perhaps to make the Thing itself troublesone and loathsome to them, so that they shall begin to seek for all Occasions to avoid it; and thus the weeping' may be in danger to undo all. Upon this Account I do humbly conceive that some Intermission and Diversion may be as necessary for the Generality of Men, as their Meat and Drink. And if we allow any Recreations, then we ought to consider the different Tempers, Educations and Conditions of Men: That may be a Recreation for a Scholar, which is not so to a Plough-man; and that may please a States-man, which would be a Punishment to a Sea-man: Nor do all Recreations become the same Persons; and if you will allow them Recreations, you must allow them such as are suitable to their Conditions, or else they are none at all to them. But though I am not unwilling to allow of some Recreations, yet I think they ought to be limited with Rules and just Cautions: As, First, That none whatsoever be allowed during the Time of public Worship; for that were to frustrate the very End and Design of the Day, and to show a Contempt of Religion at that time, when we ought openly and solemnly to make Profession of our Christianity. Secondly, That they be not over-long and tedious; for Recreation at such Time ought to be subservient to Devotion, that the Spirits being refreshed and comforted, they may return to it with more Vigour; but if they eat up too much Time, or be so used as to alienate the Mind from Religious Exercises, they are no longer Helps, but Hindrances, and so far ought to find no Encouragement. Thirdly, That they be not scandalous or injurious; for in seeking my own Refreshment, I ought not to transgress the Bounds of Justice and Charity towards others at any Time, much less at this, when all ought to conspire to give an Honour and Reputation to their Religion. But as I would advice the one Part to be as inoffensive as possible, so I could wish the other would not be over-censorious, and that they would not expect Men on Earth to be like Angels, but be content to allow some little to Humanity. I would say in this Case, as the Apostle did in another, Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not, Rom. 14.3. and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth, for God hath received him. There is more Mischief in the mutual Censures passed upon each other, and the Heats and other ill Effects thence arising, than there could be in a modest Use of Liberty in this Case, if People would learn how mutually to forbear one another. Let him who asserts his Liberty, use it warily and sparing: And let him who can evangelio others, be thankful to God for his Strength, and compassionate and kind to his Brother; and so both, from Time to Time, shall be better fitted for the Service of God; To whom be all Glory, &c. The END.