The PROCEEDINGS of the Court of Admiralty, by a special Commission, BEING The trials of all the French Pirates at the Old-Baily, on Monday. Tuseday Thursday and Friday, being the 21st, 22d, 24th, 25th Days of October, 1700, and in the 12th Year of His Majesty's Reign. THE Court being sate, and the Commission red, the Jury consisting of Half English, and Half French, were called and Sworn, whose N●mes are as followeth. English. Mr Jhon Long, Joseph Wellar, John Child, Edward Mot, Abraham Casten, James King. French. John Tremistree, Peter Cambree, John Casteer, Randal Casteneers, Richard Casteneer, Richard Hestee. After Silence being Commanded, the Prisoners following were brought to the Bar, and severally arraigned for piracy and Robbery on the High-Seas. Their Indictment where as followeth. That the said Pirates, in conjunction with o●hers of their Crew, did under the Command of Lewis Getar their Captain, on the 28th of April last, being on board a French Pirate called the Peace-Gally, ●n the High Seas, within two Leagues of scape Henry near Virginia assault in a violent and hostile manner, an Englsh Merchant Ship, called the Nicholson, Robert Lurtain Commander, and after and obstinate Resistance of about an hour and a half, took and carried away the said English Vessel, making prise of 3000 l. in Silver and Gold, besides 700 Hogsheads of Tobacco, vallu'd at 2000 l. and at the same time carried the said Vessel and Cargo into lin Haven in the West-Indies; but the Shoreham Friggat coming at the same time into that Bay, the Pirate threw most of the Tobacco overboard, and Engaged the English Friggot; but after some hours dispute, the Shbreham ●… ook the said Pirate, and sent the Men for England; and ●… eing severrlly arraigned, they pleaded Not Guilty to ●… heir Indictment. Whereupon the King's Evidence were called and Sworn, ●… iz. Robert Lurtan Captain of the Nicholson, William Hun●●ra● is Ward, Thomas Bilustan and Thomas Jacobs. Liwis Getar the Captain was first Examined, who ●… leaded, that what he did was by the Compulsion of the Ships Crew, and argued, that he was forced to take the Command of the Peace-Galley upon him, and to turn Pirate. But the aforesaid Evidence made it appear that he was very busy to put the Captain of the Nicholson down 〈…〉 the Hole, and did not any way behave himself like ●… ne compelled to that undertaking; he thereupon in his ●… efence produced a Letter in Court, containg several ●… rguments, of his endeavouring to surrender the Ship to ●… he Governor of Virginia; but not making proof thereof, and the matter being plain against him, he was found Guilty of the said Piracy and Robbery. Renock Jolliboy, by his Interpeter also alleged that he ●… as forced on board the said Pirate, and tho he owned ●… e was actualy at the taking the Nicholson, yet he pre●… ended it was against his consent, but two of the Kings Evidence, being positive that he came on board the Mer●… haunt Ship, with great Fury and Resolution, he was af●… er a fair trial found Guilty. Samuel Elsnel- was next Examined, but it appearing ●… hat he was no way consenting to the said Pirscy; but on ●… he contrary was constrained to act, tho unwilling therein, he was thereupon acquitted. Albert Lebley, being set to the Bar alleged, that he was obliged to Engage against the Nicholson by the threats of his Captain, but the Kings Evidence making it appear to the contrary, he was found Guilty of the said Piracy. Francis Lelaveen the next examined by the Court but the Evidence not in the least taxing him of being concerned in the said piracy he was acquitted. Francis Blann, a Boy of about 13 years of age was ●… xt arraigned, but the Court considering his youth, ●… d that he did not understand the meaning or at the least consequence of that undertaking, he was acpuitted. James Setoet, a Lad of about 15 years of age, was ac●… uitted by reason he was very much indisposed at the ●… me the Piracy was committed. James Tevet, was next examined, but he alleging he was actually forced to engage in that Piracy, and the Kings Evidence speaking in his favour he was brought ●… n not guilty. Heer Van Asteer, a Dutch man, and Cook of the Ship, ●… s the next that was tried, but it plainly appearing ●… h by him, as well as the Kings Evidence. that he was 〈…〉 Action he was thereupon A●● 〈…〉 John Golden, a young Lad under 14 years of age, was next examined, but the Evidence not being positive against him, and it appearing that he was enticed among them, he was Acquitted. Denoy Piloque, by his Interpreter made a long and tedious defence, but he not proving his Allegations, he was thereupon found Guilty. Rinald Hughno was then tried for the said Piracy, and the Evidence being plain against him, and he making but a frivolus defence, he was found Guilty. Peter Scheveleer was next Arrain'd, and the Captain of the Nicholson and others being positive against him he was found Guilty. Michael Painteer was tried also for the said Piracy, but it being plainly made out by the Kings Evidence, that and was forced on board the Ptrate Ship, he was thereupon Acquitted. Peter Shomeneer was next set to the Bar, and tho he used Many Arguments by his Interpreter, to invalidate the Credit of the Evidence, yet the matter of Fact being proved against him, he was found Guilty of the 〈◇〉 Piracy and Robbery. John Antony being set to the Bar, alleged by his Interpreter as the other, that he was forced into the said Piracy by Captain Gateer and others, but the Evidence spoken so home to the matter, that he was brought in Guilty. John Johnson, upon his trial alleged that he was cast away and took up by a Privateer, and by her turned over to the Peace-Gally, declaring he intended to get away as soon as possible, and the Evidence not speaking to the purpose, he was Acquitted. James Sboloon being arraigned, told the Court, that 140 Men wer● in the Privateer at first, but declared, that he was very Lame, and not fit for any enterprise; notwithstanding, the Evidence affirming the contrary, and it appearing that he was very active in the aforesaid Action, he was thereupon brought in Guilty. Peter leicester, tried for the said Piracy pleaded not Guilty, and endeavoured to insin●ate that he had attempted to escape from his Com●anions. However, it was made out by the Evidence, tha● he was violent in seizing the Nicholson, he was thereupon found Guilty. Peter Componant was next arraigned, at which time the Kings Evidence plainly made it apparent that he was the most vigorious in seizing the Nicholson, and opposing the Shoreham frigate. and tho he alleged in his Defence, as the rest of the Pirates Crew had don before, that he was forced thereunto it did not avail, for the Jury having considered the matter, brought him in Guilty of piracy and Robbery. Christopher Gill, was also tried for the aforesaid Piracy and Robrery, who utterly denied that he acted therein, any further than he was compelled by his Captain, but Mr Jacobs Carpenter of the Nicholson, being positive that he was one of the forwardest in that rash undertaking, he was thereupon brought in Guilty. Joseph Brouse was next set to the Bar, and pleaded strongly by his Interpreters that he was not in the least concerned in the aforesaid Piracy, alleging that he was very Sick, and Lame at the same time, but the Evidence affirming that they could not perceive neither any indisosition, or defect in his Limbs, but on the contrary, all the industry imaginable to promote the said Piracy, whereupon the Jury brought him in Guilty of the same. Francis Lansausey was next brought to the Bar, when the Evidence against him was Captain Lurtain, who declared that the Prisoner seemed very busy in putting, him into the Hol●, whose Evidence was also strengthened by Mr. Jacobs the Carpenter, and one William Hunt, who affirmed that he fought with fury and resolution against the Shoreham ●right, who released him and the rest of the Ship Crew, whereupon the Jury brought him in Guilty of the said Piracy. Peter Monpasian was tried for the aforesaid Piracy and Robbery, the Evidence against him was the Captain with his Boy, and two others, who also deposed that the Prisoner, with many other of his Gang, came on board the Nicholson, on the 28th of April 1699, and making themselves Masters of the said Vessel, they seized the Captain and put him wit● 50 Englishmen into the Hold, where they used them very severely; and tho he he denied the whole charge and preteneded several Excuses, it did not avail, for he was found Guilty of the said Piracy. Elias Jupee was called, who being charged with the aforesaid Piracy and Robbery, by Captain Laurten and others of the Kings Evidence; but he making it appear that he was forced on board by the Quarter-Master of the Pirate, and that he was taken at first by them out of a small Bark by compulsion, and no Evidence being positive as to any martyr of Fact he was Acquitted. Lenord Flewer was Arrain'd on the same Account and 〈…〉 ●ticular Circumstans alleged by them, and he having little to say in his defence, except that common Excuse, which they in general made use of, that being forced, he was there upon found Guilty. Francis Mombasa was next examined, against whom the Captain made Oath that he came on board his Ship and threatened him with Death if they resisted, using his Men very Inhumanly; he in his defence, said that what he did was through fear of his Captain, with other infignificant Arguments, which did no way midica●e the offence, so he was found Guilty. Charles Dinant was charged with the same Crime, by four of the Kings Evidence, and he not making any proper defence, he was Convicted. Peter Boyce being tried for the said Piracy, alleged that he was taken out of a Merchant Ship some Months before, strip'd Naked and forced on board the Peace-Gally by the Pirates, but the Evidence deposed that he was one in great Esteem among them, and Fought against the Shoreham to the last extremity, he was thereupon found Guilty. James Morro was charged with the said Piracy, who in his defence alleged that he was a Hunting in the Woods with some other near the Spanish-Seas, and some Pirates Landing there took him and forced him to join, with them, but he not proving it, and the Evidence being all positive against him he was found Guilty. Peter Gero being examined, endeavoured to insinuate that he was taken in a Conough by the said Pirates in the Ba● of St Marks, and forced to go allong with them, and that he endeavoured to escape several times; but it being proved in Court to the contrary, he was found Guilty. Francis Lavoy was charged with the said Piracy, as being taken among them, but he Pleading that the Quarter Master force● him on board, and the Kings Evedence not being positive against him, he was thereupon Acquitted. John Rupevt, was examined, who seemed to allege that he was brought on board the said Pirate by force; but the Evidence, who was in the said Pirate before him, proving it otherwise, he was found Guilty. Michal Danel, in his defence insisted that he was taken out of a Merchant Ship, and persuaded to go allong with the Pirates, which he did, not knowing them to be such; but one Hunt the Kings Evidence and the Captain of the Nicholson, making it appear to the conrarty he was found Guilty. John Denough tried for the same Offence, made many frivolous Excuses by way of evasion, but the Kings Evidence being very plain and positive against him he was found Guilty. John Durant was tried, who alleged that he was taken by another Pirate some Months before, and after that forced on board the Peace-Gally; but three of the Evidence being plain and positive against him he was found Guilty. Peter Lorroy was next examined, who in his defence, declared in Court that he was surprised by the pirates, as he was a Hunting near the Sea side in the West Indies, but no manner of proof appearing in his behalf, he was found Guilty. Peter Lecrue made such a like defence; but the Evidence speaking home to the matter he he was found Guilty. Francis Giliharhert, being accused by the Kings Evidence alleged by way of defence that he was taken out of a Merchant Ship, by the said Pirate as he was Sailing to Martinego, and ever since constrained to stay among them; but one of the Evidence deposed that he was more cruel than any of the other Pirates, by not only Beating him when they took their Ship, but put first his Thumb, and then his Little Finger into a Screw, torturing him and others in a barbarous manner, and then threatened to cut his Head off, if he did not discover where the Money lay; and then said it was brave Sport to Torment them; which in part the Prisoner confessed, so that he was found Guilty. Gerard Mastamel was next examined, and was charged by the Kings Eviden of acting cruelty to the English Prisoners in Beating and Torturing them as aforesaid, and having little to allege in his Vindication he was also Convicted. Peter D' Pompi●n, in his defence alleged that he was taken out of a Merchant Ship and, was kep't by force among them till they were taked by the Shoreham; however the Kings Evidence, especial Will. Hunt, spoken so positive against him that he was found Guilty. John Leweey being charged with the said Piracy, in his defedce declared by his Interperter, that being taken by the Spaniards in a Wood in the West Indi●s, and making his Escape, wated for a Ship to get away, met with the Pirate, in which he entered and not knowing 〈…〉 it to be such, was detaind among th●m, whereupon he was acquitted. John M●●● was next examined, who alleged that he was taken in the Spanish Woods, for ●●d among the Pirates, and detained among them, and no Evidence being positive against him he was Acquitted. Francis La Gard●● was also tried for the said Piracy, but pleading that he was forced o● bea●d the Pira●e, and the Kings Evidence speaking partly to the same Effect, be was Acquitted. 〈◇〉 L●●man tried for the said Pirac● in his defe●ce be alleged that he was enticed to the S●●●●-S●●●, and that he should have good Wages and the Ship proved a Pirate▪ with other foreign Arguments; but the Evidence deposing that he had been along time in the Pirate without endeavouring to Escape, he was thereupon brought in Guilty. Fra●●●s Pa●●●● was then examined, against whom the Evidence declared that he caused the Captain to be put into the Hole, and used great Violence to the English after they had taken Vessel, and he saying little to the purpose was found Guilty. John Levign●●, tried for the said Piracy; alleged in his defence that being a tailor, some Marin●●s perswaided him to go on B●ard to work in his Trade, but when at Sea they 〈◇〉 him they had other work for him: And the Kings Evidence not being po●●tive against him he was acquitted. John Johnson, being examined, declared by his Interpret●● that he was taken in a Dutch Merchant Ship, which the Ships-crew made a Pirate of and ●orced him to continue on Boa●d th● he often attempted to E●●●●, which some of the King● Evidence seemed to acknow●●●ge whereupon he was acqui●●ed. Andrew Radnor in his defence a●●dged that he was enticed 〈◇〉 Board the Pirate not knowing it to be such, by the Captain and others, by promising him g●od Wages, &c. Bu● all the Kings Evidence deposing to ●he contrary, by affirming that he came of his own accord, he was thereupon f●●●d Guilty. Charles boil being charged with the said Piracy, endeavoured to ex●●se himself by alleging he did 〈◇〉 know th●● to be Pirates 〈…〉 we●● 〈◇〉 Board: and farther inf●●●ed that the quarter Master made him Drunk before he we●t from Domingo; but in the other hand the Kings Evidence said he was not Dr●nk at that time and knew very well they were Pirates, so that he was found Guilty. John Byden was 〈◇〉 examined who by was of Ext●●●●●●● alleged that he was taken by the Pirates from on sh●●● a● St. Domingo and forced on Board the Pirates, but i●●●●●ing otherwise by the Kings Evidence, he was there 〈◇〉 found Guilty. John Poin●●●● being examined, alleged that, he was taken in the Wood: as he was Hunting, and forced on Board among the Pir●●● from wh●●●e could not Escape th● he endeavoured it: But several of the Evidences speaking positively against him he was found Guilty. Abraham Mos●●● tried for the said Pi●acy and Robbe●y, declared by an Interpreter that 〈…〉 of a Vessel by force and pr●duced several Aff●●●vits to that E●●●●, and none of the Evidence ●●●ng positive against him 〈◇〉 was acquitted. Anthony Coal being 〈◇〉 ●●●●iz'd, alleged in his defe●●e that being 〈◇〉 the Spanish Woods a H●●●ing near the Sea-side the Pirates Boat there Landing, the Crew ●●●k him away by vi●●●nce a●d de●ain'd him among them: But some Evidence making i● appear to the contrary he was found Guilty. Peter Lafountain pleaded in his defence that he with other were taken o●r of a W●●● where he was Hunting and carried in Board the Pirate and there kept by force, and the Ev●dence not speaking to the purpose he was acquitted. Nicholas Po●●on the made the same defence, but with less ●●●cess for the Evidence being positive that he was very active in the Piracy he was thereupon found Guilty. Francis Daniel being tried ●or the said Piracy, alleged in his defence that he with several others was forced on Board the Pirate from a Merchant Ship near Anteigo, and some of the King● Evidence speaking partly to the same purpose he was Acq●●ted. Francis Gaff●●●y being examined declared in his defence that he was in●iced on board the said Pirate, to work on his Trade, he being a Carpenter, and that he did not ●●ow it was a Pirate, till they took the Ship called the Nichol●on, at which time he designed to make his Escape; but not proving hi● Allegations, and the Evide●ce being positive against him be was found Guilty. James Randal, o● his trial alleged that he was decoyed on board 〈◇〉 Dutchman, who told him that he should have goo●●ages for a Voyage to Virgina; However it being made appear that he acted willingly and cheerfully among the Pirates, and seemed industrious to pro●en●e their unla●●ful Attempts, he was found Guilty. Michael Anderson● ●●●●●man tried for the said Piracy, in his Defence affi●●'d that going on board a Dutch Merchant Ship to work at his Trade( he being a Carpenter) he was taken thence by the said Pirates, and forced along with them; which the Kings Evidence could not contradict, he was thereupon Acquitted. Francis De●●●g● v●as al●o tried for being concerned in the said Piracy; v●ho i● his defence endeavoured to in●●nuate that he was co●●el'd on board the Pirate, and ●a●d the ver● Evidence against him knew it; but they on the contrary affirmed that he came Vollntary on board without any manner 〈◇〉 co●●traint, whereupon he was to and Guilty. Back ●o ●o being ●●●●n'd, alleged that the Pirates C●●w 〈◇〉 him from of a V●ss●l call d a C●noa, a● for●●● 〈◇〉 on ●●●rd their Ve● el, which the Evidence them●elve● could not Contradict, whereu●●n and was A●●●●t●ed. Lewis Bonson was next called 〈◇〉 t●e Bar, and charged with the said Piracy, but he alleging that he was fer●'d fro● on Story b● some of the Pirates, ●●ing him he should ●●●g●ed Wages, and so De●●●'d hi● on ●o●●d and kept him b● Compu●●● and the E●●dence not being very positive, 〈◇〉 was acquitted. Francis Bo●n in his defence alleged that being a Hunting there came a Pira●● Shall 〈◇〉 the Shore, and took him by force, and so de●ai●●●im; but t●e Evidence affirming that he used to be very active in promoting their Piratical Projectes he was found Guilty. John Durantia, alleged that and was taken on board a Dutch Ship called the Barnard, and continued in the pirates several Months by constrains; but t●●ee of the Kings Evidence seemed to aclowledge, so that he was Acquitted. Peter Luno being called to the Bar for the said Piracy and Robbery, he endeavoured to Extenu●●e his Offence by alleging that he was decayed on board by one if t●e Crew, whom he did not suspect to be a Pirate, whereby he was detained against his will, but the Captain of the Nicholson and one Hunt, a Lad spaking positivly against him as to matter of fact, he was found Guilty. Joseph Tremon Indicted for the said offence; but he alleging by his In●●●p●eters that he was forced on board the Pirate, and the Kings Evidence partly acknowledging the same, he was Acquitted. Peter Limber being called to the Da●, declared in his defence that he was taken on board a Vessel, laden with Wind and Brandy, and that having plundered the said Ship, they took him and others away by force, and the Evidence against him not being suffi●●ent to Convict him, he was Acquitted. Peter Lushard being arraigned for the said Piracy, alleged that he was taken on Board the Pirate by force, but the Kings Evidence being positive against him he was found Guilty. An●●●● merit, being examined declared by his Interpreter that he was made Drunk and so deco' d on Board the Pirate, and the Evidence not being positive against him he was acquitted. Joseph Las●er, being indicted on the same account, alleged that he was ta●en by force, from on board a Vessel laden with Corn and kept among the Pirates against his consent, he was thereupon acquitted. John Bor●●, insinuated that he was not sensible they were Pirates when he entered on board the said Peace-Gally, and that he endeavoured to Escape several times, but it appearing otherwise by the Kings Evidences he was thereupon found Guilty. Joseph L●●rud● was next examined, who in his defence asscerted that he was taken by force from on shore, by some of the Pirates Crew, and the Kings Evidence themselves, not contradicting him he was acquitted. Michael Lafeer, being Indicted for the said Piracy alleged that he was taken from on board a Merchant Man by the Pirates, and kept among them against his consent; but on the other hand, the Kings Evidence made it appear that he was from first to last most active in promoting the said Piracy and Robbery, so that he was found Guilty. Peter Jelly was next examined and pleaded not Guilty, but his excuses being not at all to the purpose, he was found Guilty. John La●●●●n being tried for the same offence, declared by his Interpreter that he was forced on board the Pirate in the West-Indies, and compelled to act tho unwillingly among them, which the Kings Evidence in part acknowledged; he was thereupon acquitted. Francis Dreway on his trial made the same defence as aforesaid, but what contrary success for four of the Kings Evidence deposing that he was more than ordinary active in the said Piracy, he was found Guilty. John Posser Indicted for the said Piracy and Robbery alleged that he was taken out of a Merchant-ship and and forced to act contrary to his Inclination in the said Pirate, but it appearing otherwise by Two of the Evidence against him, so he was also found Guilty. John Duby●ce and Peter Manguino, where both tried on three Indictments, the first for Robbing, Riffling and plundering the aforesaid Merchant Ship called the Nicholson, the Evidence being very positive against them. The second for Robbing and Plund●●ng a M●●●●● 〈◇〉 ●p called the Indian King, Ship and Tackle vallud a● 〈◇〉 l. 1000 Hogsheads of Tobacco, value 3000 l. 100 C●●nces of Silver, value 20 l. The third indictment was for Robbing, plundering and Burning the Pensilva●s Merchant-Ship and Tackle valued ●t 5●●l. 200 Clo●h C●●●●, and So Bri●nes of a con●ide●able vain the Evidence against them, deposed th●t they were both more active and resolute than ordinary in all these Pirates, and they having little to alled●e in the●r own d●f●●ce, the Jury brought them both in Guilty of three Indictments. Peter Clergy was tried on all the aforesaid Indictments but and alleged that he was t●ken on bo●●d the Pi●ate b● force, and it appearing by the Kings E●●dence that he acted on the said Vessel only as Su●ge●●; he was thereupon acquitted of all three Indictments. Julian Lasco●n, Peter Langueno, Oliver Si●vaster, divine Hughnor, laurence Carjon, and William Pha●●e; were all 6 tried on the a●oresaid Indictments, but it appea ●g 〈◇〉 they were cast-away and taken up when ●n gre● 〈◇〉 and danger, by the said Pirates, and kept on ●oard by force, which the Kings Evidence did not deny, so that they were all Six acquitted of the ●aid Indictments. John Cox was then Indicted for Drowning or choking Thomas She●chard on the 2d. of Jully at Harbaurmain, near Newfoundland, in the West-Indies, the Evidence against him was John Knight who deposed, that the P●isoner, Mr. shepherd and himself being in a large Fishing Boat on the said cost about 3 a Clock in the Morning when having been Drinking most part of that Night, the Prisoner without any manner of provocation threw Mr. shepherd over board which the Evidence seeing go● 〈◇〉 of him and pulled him into the Boat again, ●●●●eupon the Prisoner pushed him over b ard a sec●●● time, and then he was drowned? The Prisoner 〈…〉 defence alleged that he did not touch the 〈◇〉 ●●●●ed at that time, or at any other, in Anger, and 〈◇〉 ●hal insisted that the Evidence was a malicio●● M●n, and had Beat the Deceased just before affirming ●●ey were all Three very much in Drink, there●●●●●●d think that the Deceased fell into the Water b●●●cident and it appearing by the Evidence that no manner or quarrel was between the Prisoner and the D●ceased, the Jury having considered the matter brought him in not Guilty. Captain Padiston and John Swillivant, having surrendered themselves, on an Accusation of Piracy, were brought to the Bar, but none appearing against them, they were both Acquitted by Proclamation. The 29 Pirates who were acquitted of the Piracy of Robbing the Merchant Ship called the Nicholson beforementioned were called to the Bar on Thursday in the Afternoon, an●… tried upon two other Indictments, viz. The one of robin and Riffling a Merchant Ship called the Indian King, on t●… High Seas, near scape Henry aforesaid, taking and carryin●… away the said Ship, wherein were Goods and Money of considerable value; the other for practically taking, plundering and riffling another Merchant Ship called the Pensilvania wherein were Goods of Extraordinary worth and value, th●… particulars of which are mentioned in the Trials of Joh●… Dubois and Peter Manguino, &c. The Trials of those 29 was very tedious; for tho the Kings Evidence were ver●… positive, in proving all the said Prisoners on board the pirate, at taking both the Indian King and the Pensilvani●… yet the Prisoners in their defence, made such manifest Pro●… of their being forced on board the Pirate, and the Kin●… Evidence themselves acknowledging most of them had ende●…voured, or at least intended to make their Escapes as soon 〈…〉 a favourable opportunity offered, except Peter Rumo, w●… had been among the Pirates ever since they were but nine i●… number; so after the Court had explained the Evidence to the Jury, they brought him in Guilty of both I●dictments, and acquitted the rest. The trials being over, the Court proceeded to give judgement as followeth, vix. Received Sentence of Death, 52. Levis Getar, Reyno Jolliboy, Albert Lebly, Deno Peloque Renot Hughno, Francis Ly Sanguina, Peter Shevelier, Peter Peter Delepomenater, John Antonio, Peter Champaign Christ Gi●●, James Salene, Joseph Prouse, Peter Mompasia Lenord Polor'd, Francis Fombel, Charles Demeree, Pete●… Boyce, James Morrio, Peter Gero, Joseph Renew, John R●…bert, Michaiel Daniel, Joseph Durant, Pettrr Lacrol, Fra●…cis Gilyicharbert, George Dichoponea, Peter D' pomp Francis Arman, Francis Jupee, Andrew Reden, Char●… Boy, John Bydel, John Pcichevel, Anto Ceurt, Francis J●…sme, James Randan, Isaac Proisever, Francis Boy, Jo●… Durantia, Peter La Fountain, Ralph Lumber, Peter shared, John Borto, Michael La Fever, Peter Jolly, Fr●…cis D'urry, John Possuer, John Deboy, Peter Minguino. Note. The Ordinary of Newgate being Indisposed Eminent Divine is to Preach the condemned Ser●… Morrow in the Morning and Afternoon. Printed according to Order. LONDON, Printed for W.H. near Fleet-Bridge, 1700.