The Case of the Undertakers For reducing Postage of Inland Letters to just and moderate Rates, STATED. And therein, the Liberty of a Commonwealth, the weal of the Merchant and industrious Trader, and the birthright of every Free-man vindicated from monopolising restraints, and Mercenary Farming of PUPLIKE OFFICES. The Case stated. 22 JUnii, 13 Car. the late King by Letters Parents erects a new Office called The Letter-Office of England, to sand all Letters to and fro within England, Scotland, and Ireland,( except such Letters as should be sent by common known Carriers, along with their Carts, wagons, or Pack-horses; or a Letter or more sent by a messenger on purpose, or by a friend:) and to have and take for postage and conveyance certain Rates therein specified. And grants that Office to Thomas Withering for life, absque aliquo ind reddendo; and with restraints of all others to carry, &c. Notwithstanding those restrictions, divers persons continued their Liberty in sending and carrying Letters by Post; and when Withering offered to put in execution his restrictive clauses, and by colour thereof imprisoned Grover, Chatman, Cotton, and Mackedral, for posting with Letters; by the Votes of the late Parliament, on the 16 of August 1642. resolved, That the taking of Letters from, and the several restraints and imprisonments of the said persons, was against Law, Liberty, and freedom of the Subject; and that those several persons ought to have reparations from Cook, Windebank, Secretaries of State, and Withering; and that the said Secretaries and Withering were Delinquents for the same: as by the Votes appeareth. Mr. Prideaux, upon this occasion, and upon the right of Liberty that every man had to the employment, steps into it, keeps up a restraint, and continues to exact the high rate of 6 d. for every Letter. The UNDERTAKERS observing this extortive rate to be held up, as well in Witherings life-time, as after his death, when the pretence of that illegal Grant was ended in point of limitation: and observing that the whole benefit went into one private hand, and that many public and well-affected people were very much aggrieved thereat; They conceived it would be a work both acceptable to the State, and beneficial to the people, to contrive the abatement of those excessive rates; and therefore, maugre all oppositions and abuses of the monopoliser and his interest, they at first dash adventured on Postage at the rates of 3 d. a Letter beyond 80 miles, and 2 d. a Letter within or to 80 miles; and to make return three times weekly. And their exact performance in that Undertaking was so grateful to the people, and successful, that it forced the monopoliser, for the present onely, and out of a design to supplant the Undertakers, to publish his readiness to carry at the same rates. But his designs not working with the people,( who were sensible from whom their benefit came) the Undertakers persist, till it pleased God to devolve Authority on such as had from the beginning countenanced this free undertaking, and who, in their first entrance on the management of public affairs, concurred with the peoples approbation of the Undertakers, and entrusted them with their ordinary and extraordinary Dispatches; which so daunted their Antagonist, that he deserted the business, and the Undertakers persisted to perform the service to the State gratis, and to all others faithfully, at the low rate aforesaid: and reducing the same into one channel, they entertained as many of the old Post-masters as were honest and well-affected, according to the direction of the council of State; provided Packet-boats for Ireland, &c. and have adventured, after so short experience, to make an offer of sinking the rates yet lower, viz. to 2 d. and 1 d. a Letter. ☞ But to frustrate the Undertakers, and before their great expenses were reimbursed, an Order was procured from the late council of State, during the interval of Parliament, to invest one Mr. John Manley, in the Inland and foreign Postage, under a farm of 10100 l. per an. And the said Manley, immediately thereor, in the company of Mr. Prideaux, did, in a riotous manner, with swords and other weapons, by force break into the house where the Goods and Letters of the Undertakers were, and thrust their servants out of doors; and, after threatening speeches, and many more outrages committed, required the Undertakers to receive no more Letters. The right of Liberty vindicated and proved. THis being the sum of the Case, it follows that the right of Liberty on which they grounded their Undertaking be vindicated. Wherein the Question is, Whether there be a Right of Liberty in the Free people of England, up and down the common roads of England, by way of common Postage to sand& carry as they please, and at such rates as they shall agree, Letters, Packets, and such-like Dispatches incident to Commerce and Communication, without being restrainable to one person, whom all must be necessitated to trust, and by whom onely all must sand in the way of common Postage, and at such rates as it shall please the granter of that restraint to limit. The very light of Nature shows, that originally to a Community of free men linked First proof, by the light of Nature, and by the original nature of a Free State. together as a Commonwealth, and by civil Commerce and Intercourse aiming at Temporal weal, a right of Liberty to communicate their intents and mindes, by all lawful ways, and therefore by this way of Postage, as well as by any other, is innate and inherent, as that without which free Commerce cannot consist. If then in the original Constitution of the Free State of England,( as of every other Civil Community) this Liberty was a right inherent in the People, it still remains in them, unless it can be shown that they have given it up; which never can be shown: for why should rhey give up their liberty to communicate their affairs by this way of common Postage, more then by any other way? Or how can steady limits or distinctive bounds be set between this way of Liberty that they would restrain, and other ways of Liberty that they would seem to leave them? For if one, and two, and ten may use a special Poster, why may not a Corporation do the like? and what shall distinguish such a special Post as you seem to allow, from a common, which you would restrain? To restrain all ways of Free Communication, is downright to destroy Society: to restrain some lawful ways, is to impair Society, and destroyeth freedom of Society, and maketh way arbitrarily, by further and further restraints, to impair it at pleasure. Besides that it administereth occasion of daily quarrels about the limits of Restraint. All which reasons make it more then probable, that the Original Liberty of the free People in all lawful ways to communicate, was by them never yielded up to restraint. On the other side, it will easily be proved, that they never entrusted the Supreme Secondly, by the Fundamental Law of England. Ordinary Power with Authority in any way to restrain lawful employments, but with watchful jealousy have in all Ages preserved a full and free Liberty to every man to undertake them; well considering, that any restraint of lawful Industries, is a kind of strangling and stoping the Life-blood to flow freely in all its veins: This destroys or hurts the whole Natural body, That the politic. And therefore by the Fundamental Common Law of England, a Bond, though the party himself will give it to restrain himself of his lawful Trade or Industry, is adjudged voided, and not binding. 2 H. 5. fol. 5. Plito 26. On the same ground it is, that the Fundamental Law of England will not permit you to distrain and take from a man, though for a just duty, any Instrument necessary to his Trade, or free course of Industry, 14 H. 8. The Anvil from a Smith, or Millstone from the Mill, may not be distrained or taken, because it would interrupt and restrain their lawful Employments. And hereto accords the Law of God, Deut. 24. 6. No man shall take the nether or the upper millstone to pledge: for he taketh a mans life to pledge. To restrain any man of his lawful means of Livelihood, is to take away his life: and yet Mr. Manley would, &c. On the same ground it i●, that Corporations or Bodies politic( though authorised to make Constitutions and by Laws, yet) if they make a Law any way restraining any man from any lawful way of Employment or Industry, such Constitution o● Law( be it never so specious, and though perhaps it intended Order and Regulation of Employments, yet) restraining, it is null and voided. 11 Rep. fol. 53. Taylors of Ipswich, Their Constitution( That none within their Coporation should exercise the Faculty or Employment of a tailor until they had presented themselves, and had approbation from the Master and Wardens) adjudged voided, though it did not absolutely restrain, as Mr. Manley would in this case all others from executing this lawful Employment of Postage. On the same ground, Letters Patents( though passed under the Great Seal of England) if they restrain any lawful Employment to one man,& leave it not free to every other, are voided; as in the 11 Rep. fol. 85. the Patent that Darcy onely should have the making and importing of Playing Cards, the Restraint of others from that Employment( though it served but to Vanity and game, which might be prohibited) adjudged unlawful, on grave and weighty reasons. May then these Undertakers be restrained from this Employment, that serves eminently to enliven Merchandise& all Commerce? 50 E. 3. Rot. 33. Parl. Rol. one Peachey obtained a Patent that he should be the onely Importer of Sweet Wines: but his Patent was damned by judgement in Parliament. 21 E. 4. fol. 79. Edw. the fourth by Patent granted to one Molle, that he should have the Office of Brokage, or of driving Bargains 'twixt Citizen and Citizen in London; and the Patent censured, as against Law. And yet Mr. Manley will expect to be the onely Poster with Letters and Dispatches; by which Citizens and all others are to drive their Bargains and Contracts. Hundreds of Instances might be heaped up, to show the vigilancy of the Courts of of Law and of Parliaments in all Ages, to withstand all restraints of lawful Employments. One Instance more shall conclude; which is this. The Corporation of Gravesend had by Prescription an ancient Ferry and Passage with a common Barge for the benefit of poor Passengers to and fro 'twixt London and Gravesend, which carried them for 2 d. apiece, and was to pass away as soon as at that rate it had 4 s. But the Corporation finding that oftentimes when the common Barge had 23 Passengers, and was to stay but for one more, other watermen that plied at the Ferry, would take up the next Passenger at cheap rates, whereby the Barge lay long for want of a complete number; to rectify which Mischief, the Corporation( being thereto empowered by Letters Patents) make a Constitution or Law, That no other should carry, till the common Barge had its full number. This( though it restrained not others to carry, but onely gave pre-eminence to the Barge, and that at that onely Ferry, and that for so good an end, yet) on great and grave reasons, Tr. 10 Jac. C. B. it was adjudged an unlawful restraint, for that others were thereby abridged to make use of a lawful means of Livelihood: And when a Passenger was willing to be carried by another Water-man, and he willing to carry, what reason to abridge him of his lawful Employment? And if pre-eminence might be given in that Case, then Letters Patents might grant pre-eminence to one Coach-man to carry in London-streets, before another should take a Carriage; and way would be made to some restraint in every lawful Employment. Now if to grant a pre-eminence in carriage, be not to be permitted; shall it be thought lawful to exclude these Undertakers totally from carrying for all that are willing to sand by them? To these proofs of Liberty drawn out of the Fundamental Common Law of England, By the Great Charter, and other Acts of Parliament. add that of Magna Charta, cap. 29. No free man shall be dizseized of his Freehold or Liberties, &c. Which the Chief Justice Cook glosseth, in these words: This word LIBERTIES( saith he) signifieth the freedom that the Subjects have. For example: The Company of the Merchant-Taylors of London having power by their Charter to make Ordinances, made an Ordinance that every brother of the same Society should put the one half of his Clothes to be dressed by some Cloth-worker free of the same Company; and it was adjudged that this Ordinance was against Law, because it restrains the Liberty of the Subject to put his Cl●thes to be dressed by whom he will:& sic de similibus. And so it is if such or the like Grant had been made by Letters Patents. Thus he. And was this partial restraint of liberty to use whom they would for dressing, against Law and Liberty confirmed by Magna Charta; and is not this total of the Peoples Liberty to use whom they will for Posting with their Letters and Dispatches, against the same Magna Charta? And if against Magna Charta, against more then 20 other Acts of Parliament confirming the same. So that it is needless to add more Acts of Parliament for vindication of this right of Liberty. Now to these proofs, onely add the Resolves in Parliament, and Resolution of Resolves of Parliament,& Resolution of Judges in the point. Judges in the very point in this particular Case. 1. The Resolve 16 Augusti, 1642. in stating the Case above mentioned. 2. In pursuance of an Order of the Lords in Parliament, 22 Julii, 1646. the opinions of Judge roll and pheasant were delivered, That the clauses of Restraint in Witherings Patent were voided, and not good in Law. And the Committee of Lords of Parliament concurred in opinion with the Judges. Whereupon, Ordered, &c. This which is said, together with the manifold mischiefs and miseries that ever ensue on such Restraints( which the Authorities cited give some touch of) shall serve to conclude this Part, which is to vindicate and prove a legal right of Liberty not subject to monopolising Restraints. Farming of public Offices condemned. NOw as Restraint of just Liberty is condemned by Law, as pernicious to a free People; so yet further, the mercenary farming of public Offices or Employments is much more abhorred, as the very bane of a republic. This abuse was it that caused the roman Patriot to bid a sad and sharp farewell to Rome: Vade venalis civitas, mox peritura si emptorem invenias. sallust. Against this abuse the wisdom of Parliament bendsit self, 12 R. 2. c. 2. That none should be put in Offices by svit, or for reward, gift, or brokage, but upon desert. A Law( saith Cook) worthy to be written in letters of gold. Against this abuse in many Offices of the like nature, the Stat. 5 E. 6. c. 16. provides a sharp penalty; and the Preamble condemns it in all Places of public Trust. And Reason and Experience show it to be very incovenient: for will not he that thus buys his Employment by whole-sale, sell by retail, in polling and exacting on the people? And though his Exactions should be grievous, will he not hope to find favour against Complaints, as being the States Farmer? And seeing the State are at no costs to accommodate the People with Postage, what ground is there to nip a Farm or penny towards it, out of every poor mother that desires to hear from her child? Is not this that Tallagium non concedendum, against which the Stat. 25 E. 1.& 34 E. 1. de Tallagio, do provide? Within this Act( saith Cook 2 Inst. 533) are all new Offices erected with new Fees, or old Offices with new Fees: for that is a Tallage put upon the Subject. And therefore such Grant, though made pro bono publico, was in Parl. 13 H. 4. num. 43. condemned, quia sonat in oppressionem populi. And if this of Postage be not a new Office, yet in the restrictive part it is no elder then 13 Car. and that restriction no sooner put in use, but condemned in Parl. 1642. And in this point of raising a Farm out of this public employment, the design is so new, that to this day the Free-men of England have not been acquainted with it; nor did any polling Courtier, when the strains of Prerogative were at highest, ever offer at it: but the Kings Grant was always Absque aliquo ind reddendo. If it be objected, That the absolute power of Parliament is not restrained to the Law that is, but may make a a Law for erecting an Office, and with restraint of all men to use that Officer, and at such a fee or rate out of which they may reserve a Farm: 'tis humbly conceived that the wisdom of Parliament will not be taken in the wil●ss of such a Project, though the Projector shall bait his design with 10100 l. per an. profit. For that it is not only against Law, but against the fundamental Common law, against the innate liberty of a free-born people, against the Great Charter of Liberties, and sundry high-prized Acts of Parliament; and so, that it makes way to, and introduceth all manner of Monopolies. The opposing whereof, hath made former Parliaments most dear to the people, and their memory precious. And it seems probable, that the People would better brook 10100 l. per mens. added to the public Tax, then 10100 l. per an. this way to be raised: for that being grounded on extraordinary occasions, cannot be drawn into example to charge them ordinarily( as this way:) That raiseth no more then is imposed,& which comes to the public use; This gives occasion to the Farmer, under colour of raising his Farm, to raise to himself triple as much, by keeping up high rates, and exacting. That proportionably lays the charge on all men according to their value, This pincheth the Merchant and active Dealer( most to be favoured and encouraged) and lets the idle Drone and lazy Peasant go free; which is against Distributive justice. All which Reasons and Considerations are humbly submitted to judgement of the true Patriots of the Peoples Liberty, the present Parliament. FINIS. To all ingenuous People: A second Intimation from the New Undertakers for conveyance of Letters at half the rates to several parts of England and Scotland. WHereas several printed Papers have been scattered up and down the Cities of London, and Westminster, and in many considerable towns and places in England and Scotland, intimating, that if any persons sand their Letters by the Old Post, they will have a free and safe going and coming, but if they sand by the New Undertakers, their passage will be interrupted, which we cannot but look upon as a Design on purpose to deter all persons from bringing their Letters to us, which Design we perceive is still carried on, as appears by a bufie Pamphleteer in his last weekly book of several Proceedings, in which the said Paper is recited, as if the State had allowed thereof. And though divers persons employed by us in the carriage of our mail, have of late under false colours and pretences been much affronted and interrupted by some malicious Post-Masters and others, acting only upon the account of Self-interest, yet against them we are( upon good advice) proceeding by several Actions and Indictments, and doubt not of Justice and reparation, according to due course of Law, all such interruption being contrary to the Law of the Land. And whereas we have hitherto gone on, and resolve still to proceed in the management of our honest and just undertaking( which hath already been so serviceable to this Nation) in a legal and warrantable way: Now for the future prevention of abuses and affronts to those persons that shall be employed by us, and to the end the people of this Nation may not be deceived by those false suggestions and pretences, which hitherto have been published only to delude them and abuse us; We whose names are hereunto subscribed, being the first Undertakers for the speedy conveyance of Letters at half the Rates to several parts of England and Scotland, do hereby declare to all Gentlemen, Merchants, and other persons whatsoever, that we do intend resolvedly( by the help of God) to continue the management of this our undertaking, and for the further accommodation of all men of business, and for improvement of Trade, to carry to places not formerly supplied, with the like conveyance; as also to add one day more weekly for the sending out of Letters,( that is to say) Thursdaies as well as Tuesdaies and saturdays, and to have returns answerably, the first Thursday to begin the 28. of this present April, and the same places of receipt to continue as formerly, we having received much encouragement by ingenuous and public minded people, and no discouragement at all from Supreme Authority, nor can it rationally be imagined, that ever they will countenance the Disturbers of so public and beneficial an undertaking. Clement Oxenbridge. Francis Thomson. Richard Blackwall. William Malyne.