Research Article
Making Job Postings More Equitable: Evidence Based
Recommendations from an Analysis of Data Professionals Job Postings Between
2013-2018
Joanna Thielen
Biomedical Engineering Librarian
Art, Architecture &
Engineering Library
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United
States of America
Email: jethiele@umich.edu
Amy Neeser
Consulting & Outreach Lead
Research IT
University of California
Berkeley
Berkeley, California, United
States of America
Email: aneeser@berkeley.edu
Received: 1 Mar. 2020 Accepted: 18 June 2020
2020 Thielen and Neeser. This is an Open
Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0
International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
Data Availability: Neeser, A., & Thielen,
J. (2020). Making job postings more equitable: evidence-based recommendations
from an analysis of data professionals job postings between 2013-2018 (V2)
[dataset]. UC Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.6078/D1K419
DOI: 10.18438/eblip29674
Abstract
Objective - Over the last decade, many academic libraries have hired
data professionals to offer research data services. As these positions often
require different types of experience than traditional librarian positions,
there is an increased interest in hiring professionals from outside the typical
library and information science (LIS) pipeline. More broadly, there has also
been an increased interest in academic libraries and higher education to
incorporate the principles and practices of diversity, equity, inclusion, and
accessibility (DEI&A) into their work. These phenomena allow an opportunity
to examine the growing area of data professionals and library hiring practices
through the lens of DEI&A. Data was collected from 180 data professional
job positions, including education, experiences, and skills, to better
understand the evolving and complex landscape of data professionals and to
provide evidence based recommendations regarding how
the profession can enact meaningful and lasting change in the areas of
DEI&A.
Methods - The qualifications and responsibilities listed in data
professional job postings from 2013 to 2018 were examined. Prior to analyzing
the job postings, a codebook of 43 variables was developed. The 177 data
professional job postings (corresponding to 180 positions) were independently
analyzed, noting the presence of each variable, including the locations and the
degrees of complexity sought. After coding, discrepancies were mutually
resolved. Overall, the coding process had 94% intercoder agreement, which
indicates a high level of agreement.
Results - Over one-third of
postings (n = 63, 35%) did not use
the word “librarian” in the job title. Eighty-eight percent (n = 159) required a Master’s in LIS
degree, but 67% (n = 119) also
accepted an equivalent degree. Over half of the positions (n = 108, 60%) were also looking for an additional degree, most
frequently a graduate degree. The median salary of the positions listing a
quantitative value was $57,000; however, this value may not be accurate because
only 26% of job positions (n = 47)
gave a quantitative salary. From the research data management skills mentioned,
general data management (n = 155,
86%), data repositories (n = 122,
68%), and data curation (n = 101,
56%) appeared most frequently. Libraries were also looking for traditional LIS
skills and experiences, including instruction (n = 138, 77%), consultation (n
= 121, 67%), and a public services perspective (n = 69, 38%).
Conclusion - The
results show that academic libraries are trying to recruit candidates from
outside the traditional academic library pipeline. Research data activities (a
non-traditional area for LIS) and traditional LIS areas were both frequently
mentioned. Overall, these job positions should be written through a more intentional
lens of DEI&A. This would help to make data professional positions more
diverse and inclusive, while also helping academic libraries to reach their
goal of recruiting outside of LIS. A set of concrete DEI&A recommendations
are provided that are applicable for writing all library positions, so that
readers can put these results into action and enact meaningful change within
the profession.
Introduction
Over the last decade, an increasing number of academic
libraries have hired data professionals to offer research data services (RDS)
to facilitate the advancement of research. Data professionals help researchers
to “address the full data lifecycle, including the data management plan,
digital curation (selection, preservation, maintenance, and archiving), and
metadata creation and conversion” (Tenopir, Sandusky,
Allard, & Birch, 2013, p. 70). These positions often require different
types of experience than traditional librarian positions, which can create an
interest in hiring professionals from outside of the typical library and
information science (LIS) pipeline. Accepting a variety of academic backgrounds
and professional experiences naturally increases other forms of diversity
because more types of people will apply. Furthermore, there is an increased
interest in academic libraries and higher education more broadly to incorporate
principles and practices of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility
(DEI&A) into their work. Examining the landscape of data professionals
working in academic libraries and formulating recommendations for action can
help increase diversity in these positions, reducing disparities within the
profession and its institutions. The consequence of perpetuating the status quo
is to worsen the disparities amongst underprivileged and underrepresented
groups. As hiring managers, search committee members, tenure review committee
members, advocates, and conversation starters, everyone has a role to play in
making our profession more equitable and inclusive for a more diverse groups of
professionals. DEI&A is much more than simply having a library or institutional
statement at the bottom of a job posting. DEI&A principles and practices
should inform every aspect of a job posting. This evidence
based research study presents the data collected from a deductive
thematic analysis of 177 data professional job postings, including education,
experiences, and skills, to better understand the complex landscape of data
professionals. The findings are used to create a set of recommendations for how
DEI&A principles can be incorporated into any academic library job posting so
that the profession can enact meaningful and lasting change.
Research Data Services in Academic Libraries
The need for academic libraries to provide RDS due to the
emergence of more data intensive research, data management mandates from
funding agencies, and other factors, has been well-established in the
literature (Tenopir et al., 2013). Further, RDS is
listed as a top trend in academic libraries in both 2016 and 2018 by the
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (ACRL Research Planning
and Review Committee, 2016; ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee, 2018).
As RDS is an emerging area within academic librarianship, the literature
consists mostly of case studies, focused primarily on assessing the needs of
campus researchers and implementing these services, as summarized by Tenopir, Kaufman, Sandusky, and Pollock (2019). While this
literature provides valuable information about researcher needs and the
implementation of RDS services, it provides little information on the emerging
sub-discipline of data professionals. There is a need to capture data about the
responsibilities, qualifications, and other information about data professional
positions, such as education, experiences, and skills.
DEI&A in Academic Libraries and Higher Education
Academic libraries have a long history of valuing
DEI&A. Examples include research on accessibility and diversity of library
websites (Yoon, Hulscher, & Dols,
2016) and LIS student groups advocating for DEI&A inclusion in LIS curriculum
(Jardine & Zerhusen, 2015). There are several
examples of conferences and events on this topic, such as the Conference
on Inclusion and Diversity in Library & Information Science (https://cidlis.umd.edu/). Other national LIS conferences, such as the Digital
Library Federation and Research Data Access and Preservation Association, have
tracks or specific foci on these topics. Further, national groups such as the
American Library Association and ACRL have offices and committees to ensure the
prioritization of DEI&A.
Similarly, higher education institutions have also been
incorporating DEI&A into their values and work, as seen throughout
professional publications such as Inside
Higher Ed (Willis, 2017) and the Chronicle
of Higher Education (Brown, 2019). Professional associations such as
Educause (n.d.) have identified DEI&A as a critical priority and higher
education conferences such as the Leadership in Higher Education (https://www.magnapubs.com/leadership-in-higher-education-conference/) are likewise focusing on these themes. Additionally,
individual universities have incorporated these principles into many facets of
the institution, such as the University of Michigan’s Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Certificate (n.d.) for graduate students and the University of
California Berkeley’s (2018) strategic plan. However, one area that has
received less attention from the DEI&A perspective is the job search
process in academia, which is opaque and favors those on the inside (Fernandes
et al., 2020).
Job Posting Analyses to Create a Landscape of Data
Professionals
Job postings describe “the duties and responsibilities
... experience, education, skills, knowledge, or other attributes required for
the job; and the hiring organization, salary range, and other benefits” (Kim
& Angnakoon, 2016, p. 327). Academic libraries
can also use job postings to articulate their needs and priorities, especially
for areas of expansion such as RDS.
Subsets of RDS job postings have been examined via
content analysis. Si, Zhuang, Xing, and Guo (2013) compared the core
competencies and duties of scientific data specialists in 46 job postings to
the current curricula in 38 LIS programs. They found that most LIS curricula
train students in the basics of data curation, but more specialized areas were
limited. Kim, Warga, and Moen (2013) studied job
postings for digital curation positions and developed a set of competencies for
digital curation responsibilities, which were used to create curricula in
digital curation and data management. Xia and Wang (2014) visualized keyword
and phrase occurrences of 167 job postings for social science data librarians
from 2005-2012. Chen and Zhang (2017) analyzed 70 data management
professionals’ positions, from January to April 2015 using word frequency
analysis, finding that 27% of postings mentioned a Master’s degree in Library
and Information Science (MLIS).
Thematic Analysis as a Research Method
Thematic analyses “move beyond counting explicit words or
phrases and focus on identifying and describing both implicit and explicit
ideas within the data” (Guest, MacQueen, & Namey,
2012, p. 10). This method yields richer results than word frequency analysis
because it can “captur[e] the complexities of meaning
within a textual data set” (Guest et al., 2012, p. 11). This methodology has been previously applied to the analysis of
job postings within academic libraries. Hall-Ellis (2005; 2006) used this
confirmatory method to track changing expectations and requirements for
entry-level cataloguer positions and managerial cataloguer positions. In
addition to coding the appearance of predetermined variables in the job
postings, Hall-Ellis (2005; 2006) also coded for the complexity of each
variable, which cannot be done with word frequency analysis. A more rigorous
analysis of job postings within RDS using thematic analysis is lacking from the
literature, with Chen and Zhang (2017, p. 22) noting that the results of their
study shows “a need for a follow-up study to monitor the development of th[is] emerging job area.”
Aims
This research project aims to answer the following
research questions:
1.
What are the most
frequently occurring qualifications (required and preferred) and
responsibilities for data professional positions?
a.
Specifically, what
education and experiences occur most frequently?
b.
What research data
activities occur most frequently?
c.
What other
responsibilities and skills occur most frequently?
2.
What is the median
salary and salary range of data professional positions?
This research study uses deductive thematic analysis to
examine data professional job postings that were posted from January 1, 2013 to
June 30, 2018. These job postings were gathered from the following electronic
mailing lists: 1) ACRL Science & Technology Section (n.d),
2) Code4Lib jobs list (n.d.), 3)
Digital Library Federation Job Board (n.d.), 4) International Association of
Social Science Information Services & Technology jobs portal (n.d.) and 5)
Research Data Access and Preservation Association (n.d.). In addition, DataCure (an electronic mailing list on Google Groups) was
analyzed for job postings; note that the viewer must be a member before
accessing the list but anyone is allowed to join. These data sources were
chosen because they are known nationally, attract job postings from a diverse
pool of academic libraries, and provide access to job postings during the
chosen time frame.
In some cases, the job announcement did not contain the
complete job posting. In these cases, links to external websites (usually the
university jobs portal), the Internet Archive WayBack
Machine (n.d.), Google searches, and personal communications were used to
locate the complete job posting. Seven job postings were excluded from this
study because the full posting could not be located.
Job postings were first evaluated based on the job title.
If a job title referenced data or RDS, the job posting was downloaded for
further analysis. Postings were then reviewed to determine if they met the
following four inclusion criteria:
1.
Full-time,
permanent positions
2.
Located in an
academic library
3.
Located within the
US
4.
Primarily focused
on providing RDS, which was defined as 50% or more of job responsibilities
devoted to these services. The following description of RDS from Cox and Pinfield (2014) was used to determine if the job position
fulfilled this criterion and positions that focused on library or
administrative data were excluded:
[RDS] consists of a number of different activities and
processes associated with the data lifecycle, involving the design and creation
of data, storage, security, preservation, retrieval, sharing, and reuse, all taking into account technical capabilities, ethical
considerations, legal issues and governance frameworks. (Cox & Pinfield, 2014, p. 300)
Once it was concluded that a job met the four inclusion
criteria, metadata about the job posting was recorded, including the university
name, job title, and posting date (see Appendix A for metadata on the job
postings). In total, 236 full data professional job postings were gathered.
However, this corpus contained duplicates. Job postings from the same
university posted within 12 months of each other were targeted as possible
duplicates. Several factors were scrutinized to determine if the postings were
duplicates of the same position, including posting date, job title,
responsibilities, and qualifications. If the postings had 25% or more
difference in their responsibilities or qualifications, they were not
considered duplicates and each posting was kept in the corpus. Potential
duplicate postings were reviewed individually to determine if the posting
should be included or excluded. Determinations were then discussed and
agreement was reached on the inclusion or exclusion for each posting. If
postings were duplicated, the posting with the most recent posting date was
kept. In total, 59 postings were removed as duplicates, leaving 177 job
postings corresponding to 180 job positions (3 job postings were for 2
positions).
To determine patterns in the qualifications and
responsibilities for data professionals, a confirmatory approach was taken
using a deductive thematic analysis methodology. A codebook of variables and
attributes for each variable was determined prior to analyzing the job
positions. The codebook was based on Hall-Ellis’ (2005; 2006) thematic analyses
of cataloguing librarian job postings. Appendix B shows the complete codebook
of 43 variables and corresponding attributes. Each variable in the codebook was
operationally defined in order to avoid ambiguity. Descriptions of when each variable
should be used and should not be used were included. Variables were grouped
into three categories: 1) education, experience, and salary; 2) research data
activities; and 3) other responsibilities and skills. For each of the 43
variables, the attribute of location in the job posting was coded (see Table 1
for list of attributes). If the variable was mentioned in multiple locations in
the job positions, only one location was recorded, based on the following
hierarchy: required qualifications > preferred qualifications >
responsibilities > description. For example, if the variable “data
management plan” appeared in the responsibilities and preferred qualifications
sections, it was coded as preferred qualifications. For the variables in the
research data activities category and most variables in the other
responsibilities or skills category, an interval scale correlating to the
stated degree of complexity sought was also coded (Table 1). The codebook was
reviewed by two academic data professionals (who were not affiliated with the
project) and their feedback was incorporated to ensure that the variables were
an accurate and thorough representation of the responsibilities and
qualifications sought for data professionals.
All job postings were coded independently to ensure
consistency and reliability. Initially, a small corpus of 15 job postings was
coded and the codebook was refined to define variables more clearly, add
additional variables, eliminate unneeded variables, and revise attributes.
After these revisions, the entire corpus of 177 job postings was coded. Coding
discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Coding reflected a high level
of intercoder agreement; percent agreement was 94%, which is higher than the threshold
of 80% for good agreement (Guest et al., 2012).
Table 1
Attributes for the Variable “Data Storage” a
Variable = |
Data Storage |
|
|
|
|
|
Attributes |
|
|
|
|
Location in the job posting |
Required qualifications (minimum requirements; basic
requirements) |
Preferred qualifications (Desired qualifications) |
Responsibilities (Duties) |
Description |
Not applicable |
Degree of complexity sought |
Experience (ability; demonstrated ability; aptitude) |
Knowledge (understanding; competent; competence) |
Familiarity |
Implied |
Not applicable |
a Synonyms for each attribute are shown in
parenthesis. The full codebook is in Appendix B.
Table 2
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions
of Higher Education for the Job Positions (n
= 180) (Shown in Descending Order of Institutional Size)
Carnegie Classification |
n |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
146 |
Doctoral Universities: High Research Activity |
19 |
Doctoral/Professional Schools |
1 |
Master's Colleges & Universities: Larger Programs |
2 |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences Focus |
8 |
Special Focus Four-Year: Medical Schools & Centers |
3 |
Special Focus Four-Year: Other Health Professions
Schools |
1 |
Results
Metadata about the Job Positions
The entire corpus contained 177 job postings,
corresponding to 180 job positions. All of the following analyses were based on
the number of job positions. The number of job positions posted each year over
the 2013-2017 time frame remained relatively
consistent, ranging from 25 to 38 positions. The positions were geographically
dispersed across the US, spread out across 37 states and Washington D.C.
Most positions were located at doctoral-granting
universities with very high research activity (n = 146, 81%), based on The Carnegie Classification of Institutions
of Higher Education (Indiana University, 2017). The breakdown of job positions
by the Carnegie Classification of the institutions is shown in Table 2.
From the 180 positions, there were 119 unique job titles
(job titles were analyzed based on exactly how they appeared in the job
posting). The four job titles occurring most frequently were:
·
Data Services
Librarian (n = 23, 13%)
·
Data Curation
Librarian (n = 7, 4%)
·
Research Data
Management Librarian (n = 6, 3%)
·
Data Librarian (n = 6, 3%)
Further, over one-third (n = 63, 35%) of the job titles did not include the word
“librarian”, instead using terms such as specialist, consultant, informationist, curator, coordinator, and analyst.
Education and Experience
Of the 180 positions, almost 90% (n = 159) listed an MLIS degree as a qualification (Figure 1).
However, over 70% of positions (n = 132, 73%) accepted an equivalent degree in lieu of an MLIS
degree and all mentions of an equivalent degree were located in the required
qualifications. One position listed this qualification as “MLIS degree or
equivalent advanced degree in the social sciences.” Figures 2 and 3 show the
level and disciplines mentioned for these equivalent degrees (note that a
position could list multiple levels or disciplines). The most frequent
equivalent degree level sought was an advanced degree (n = 73) and the most frequent discipline of the equivalent degree
was relevant (n = 47). While the term
“relevant” is ambiguous, it does reflect the terms used in the job postings.
Figure 1
The location of an MLIS as a qualification
for the job position (n = 180).
Figure 2
The levels of equivalent degrees mentioned. Synonyms
for advanced were graduate and professional; a synonym for doctorate was
terminal. Note that a position could list multiple degree levels.
Figure 3
The disciplines of equivalent degrees
mentioned. Synonyms
for relevant were related, appropriate, and comparable. Note that a position
could list multiple degree disciplines.
In addition to an MLIS or equivalent degree, 60% of job
positions (n = 108) wanted the
candidate to have an additional degree (either undergraduate or graduate). For
example, a preferred qualification for one job position was an “additional
relevant graduate degree.” The majority (78%, n = 84) of these additional degrees were listed as a preferred
qualification. As for the level of the degree, the majority wanted an advanced
degree (n = 65; Figure 4).
When an additional degree was mentioned, discipline(s) of
that degree were sometimes also mentioned. Of the 108 positions that listed an
additional degree as a qualification, the science, technology, engineering and
math (STEM; n = 59) and social
sciences (n = 47) disciplines were
mentioned most frequently (a position could list multiple disciplines and the
complete disciplinary list is shown in Table 3).
Table 3
Disciplines Listed for an Additional Degree
as a Qualification b
Discipline |
n |
STEM |
59 |
Social Sciences |
47 |
Data Science, Data Intensive Field, and others. |
27 |
Business |
7 |
Relevant |
7 |
Health Sciences |
5 |
Arts & Humanities |
4 |
b Note that a position could list multiple
disciplines. Synonyms for relevant were related, appropriate, and comparable.
Figure 4
The level of an additional degree mentioned. Synonyms for
advanced were graduate and professional; a synonym for doctorate was terminal.
Note that a position could list multiple degree levels.
Of the 117 positions with the word “librarian” in the
title, 62% (n = 73) accepted an MLIS
degree or equivalent degree, while 36% (n
= 42) only accepted an MLIS degree (Figure 5). Conversely, of the 63 postings
that did not use the word “librarian” in the job title, 65% (n = 41) accepted an MLIS or equivalent
degree and 2% (n = 1) only accepted
an MLIS degree.
In addition to educational qualifications, many positions
were seeking professional experience. Almost half (n = 87, 48%) wanted a candidate who had previous academic library
experience, with those mentions split between required (n = 39) and preferred qualifications (n = 48). Figure 6 shows the length of academic library experience
listed in the job positions, with almost half (n = 43) not specifying a length of time. In terms of previous
experience with research data, 60% (n
= 108) of positions wanted a candidate with this type of experience, most
frequently naming it a required qualification (n = 85). Only a few positions (n = 21) listed a length of time for
this experience, with 3 to 5 years (n
= 11) being the most frequent length of time. For example, one position listed
a required qualification as “minimum of three years professional experience
working with large research datasets and/or familiarity with major data
resources.”
In addition to professional experience, about one-fifth
of the job positions (n = 35, 19%)
were looking for additional academic experience. Almost two-thirds of mentions
were for lab or research experience (n
= 23), while the remaining one-third of the mentions were for significant
coursework or academic background in a discipline (n = 12; note that a position could list multiple types of academic
experiences). All mentions of additional academic experience were in the
required or preferred qualifications. While these terms for academic
experiences are nebulous, they mirror the terms used in job postings. Examples
of these qualifications are “research laboratory experience” as a preferred
qualification and “coursework or experience leading to knowledge of the
principles and practices of data curation and long-term digital preservation”
as a required qualification.
Figure 5
Degree requirements for positions with the
word “librarian” in the job title (n
= 117) and without the word “librarian” in the job title (n = 63).
Figure 6
The length of experience in an academic
library listed as a qualification (n
= 180).
Almost half (n
= 77, 43%) of the positions did not mention salary. When salary was mentioned,
about a third (n = 57, 32%) only used
descriptive words such as commensurate or competitive (Figure 7). A quarter (n = 47, 25%) gave a quantitative salary
value, with or without descriptive words. The range of salaries listed was from
$40,000 to $157,000, with a median salary of $57,000, and over half (n = 25) clustered between $54,000 -
68,000 (Figure 8).
Research Data Activities
Of the 180 job positions, the most common research data
activities mentioned were general data management (n = 154, 86%), data repository (n
= 122, 68%), data curation (n = 101,
56%), data discovery (n = 97, 54%)
and data documentation (n = 96, 53%;
Figures 9 and 10 and Appendix C). General data management was most commonly
mentioned in the preferred qualifications (n
= 73) and the degree of complexity sought most frequently was “experience” (n = 58, 37%). The variable “general data
management” is vague, but it reflects the actual terminology used in job
postings. For example, one job position listed “assists faculty and graduate
students with data management” as a responsibility; this is also an example of
“implied” as the degree of complexity for this variable. In contrast, the more
specific variable “data management plans” was mentioned in over 40% of
positions (n = 76, 42%), most
commonly mentioned in the required qualifications section (n = 24).
“Data repository” was mentioned in more than two-thirds
of positions (n = 122, 67%). This was
the variable with the highest number of occurrences in the required
qualifications (n = 52); but it was
also mentioned frequently in the responsibilities (n = 33) and preferred qualifications (n = 31). As for the degree of complexity sought, “experience” (n = 34) and “knowledge” (n = 32) were most common.
Figure 7
How salary was described in the job positions
(n = 180).
Figure 8
Histogram of salary values (n = 47). If a salary range was given for
the position, the median value was used.
Different types of data analysis (general, statistical,
spatial, or qualitative) were often mentioned in the job positions. In total,
at least 1 type of data analysis was listed in over 60% of positions (n = 111; note that multiple types of
data analysis could be listed in a position). “General data analysis”, the
variable used when a specific type of data analysis was not mentioned, was
mentioned in over 40% of the positions (n
= 78, 43%). Over half of these mentions occurred in the required
qualifications section (n = 42, 53%).
Additionally, half of these mentions were seeking “experience” for the degree
of complexity (n = 39). For example,
one job position stated, as a required qualification, “knowledge of
quantitative data analysis applications.” Statistical (n = 76, 42%), spatial (n =
46, 26%), and qualitative (n = 36,
20%) data analysis were also mentioned in the job positions. Statistical
analysis (n = 45, 59%) was most
frequently listed as a required qualification, while spatial (n = 24, 52%) and qualitative data
analysis (n = 18, 50%) were most
frequently listed as preferred qualifications. As for the degree of complexity
sought, all 3 types of analysis were most frequently seeking “experience”
(statistical analysis: n = 45;
spatial analysis: n = 24; qualitative
analysis: n = 21).
Other Responsibilities and Skills
About one-third (n
= 60) of the job positions had faculty status; two-thirds of those with faculty
status (n = 40) were also
tenure-track. The requirement to research and publish
was mentioned in about one-third of the positions (n = 55, 31%), most commonly listed in the responsibilities section
(n = 28). Having a public or customer
service perspective was mentioned in 38% of the postings (n = 69), most frequently mentioned as a required qualification (n = 46, 67%).
Instruction was mentioned in over three-fourths of
positions (n = 138, 76%). Although
mentioned in all 4 main locations within a job posting, mentions of instruction
were most frequently mentioned in the required qualifications (n = 49) and responsibilities (n = 46). This variable listed
“experience” as the most common degree of complexity sought (n = 81, 59%).
Figure 9
Summary of the degree of complexity sought. Raw
values are shown in Appendix C.
Figure 10
Summary of B) location in the job posting for
17 research data activities (n =
180).
Raw values are shown in Appendix C.
Consultation was mentioned in over two-thirds of the
positions (n = 121, 67%), most
frequently in the responsibilities section (n
= 93). Additionally, 85% of these mentions listed “implied” as the degree of
complexity sought (n = 103), meaning
that a specific degree of complexity was not mentioned. For example, one job
position stated in the description that the incumbent will “provid[e]
training and consulting services.”
More than 40% of the positions were focused on meeting
research data needs within specific disciplines (n = 75, 42%). This variable was most commonly listed in the
responsibilities section (n = 42,
23%). Of those focused on specific disciplines, the most common discipline was
the social sciences (n = 32; Table 4
shows the complete disciplinary breakdown).
Table 4
Disciplines of Job Positions that focused on
the Research Data Needs of Specific Disciplines c
Discipline |
n |
Social Sciences |
32 |
STEM |
22 |
Health Sciences |
20 |
Business |
7 |
Arts & Humanities |
4 |
c If specific departments were listed, they
were grouped into their broader discipline (multiple disciplines could be
listed for a position).
Additionally, 28% (n
= 51) of the job positions were the liaison to 1 or more departments or units on
campus; this variable was most commonly listed in the responsibilities section
(n = 40, 22%). Of those with liaison
responsibilities, three-fourths (n =
37, 73%) listed specific departments or disciplines (Table 5) and the remaining
positions had a department(s) assigned upon hiring. Of the 51 positions listing
liaison responsibilities, over 85% (n
= 44) also had instruction duties, as opposed to 72% of positions (n = 93) without liaison duties.
Table 5
Disciplines for Job Positions that included
Liaison Responsibilities to One or More Department or Unit d
Discipline |
n |
STEM |
14 |
Social Sciences |
13 |
Business |
8 |
Health Sciences |
4 |
Administrative Units |
3 |
Data Science |
2 |
Arts & Humanities |
1 |
d If specific departments were listed, they
were grouped into their broader discipline (multiple disciplines could be
listed for a position).
The variable of DEI&A related to the position, not
the university or library, was mentioned in less than half of the positions (n = 75, 42%). These statements were most
often included in the required qualifications section (n = 51), followed by the preferred qualifications section (n = 15). As these statements most often
referred to a candidate’s commitment to or understanding of the importance of
DEI&A, the degree of complexity was not coded. For example, one required
qualification was a “commitment to supporting and working in a multicultural
and diverse environment.” Figure 11 shows that this variable was included in
more job positions over time.
Figure 11
Number of occurrences of DEI&A statements
relating to the position over time. Positions from 2018 were not included because
they were only gathered for half of that year.
Discussion
What are the Required and Preferred Qualifications and
Responsibilities for Data Professional Positions?
Overall, the education, experiences, and skills mentioned
throughout these data professional job positions show that this sub-discipline
of academic librarianship is looking for a mixture of traditional (instruction,
consultation, and others) and non-traditional areas (general data management,
data repositories, and others) for LIS. While the skills and experiences of
those within the academic library pipeline are still sought, this mixture
indicates an eagerness to recruit candidates from outside of the traditional
LIS pipeline; this is a positive sign towards diversifying academic
librarianship. Therefore, data professional positions are ripe to accept a
variety of academic backgrounds and professional experiences, which naturally
attract diverse candidates and thereby increase other forms of diversity.
Education and Experience
In the degree qualifications, over 70% (n = 132, 67%) accepted an equivalent
degree in lieu of the MLIS degree. However, most positions were still seeking
candidates with a degree beyond a Bachelor’s (n = 104). Interestingly, for these equivalent degrees, most
commonly the term “relevant” (n = 47)
was used to describe the discipline or the discipline was not specified (n = 41). If a specific discipline was
mentioned, STEM was the most common (n
= 35). This indicates that libraries are seeking candidates with graduate
degrees from all disciplines for their data professional positions, allowing
for a diverse set of backgrounds and thus more diverse candidates. Many
libraries were seeking candidates possessing an additional degree (n = 108, 60%), most frequently mentioned
as a preferred qualification (n =
84). Again, if a specific discipline was mentioned, STEM was most common (n = 59). These degree qualifications are
troubling from a DEI&A lens because many inequities in our society prevent individuals
from obtaining a graduate degree much less multiple graduate degrees (Soto & Yao, 2010). In 2018, only
10.2% of the US adult population had a Master’s degree and only 2.1% had a
doctoral degree (Oh and Kim, 2020). Instead of listing these degrees by
default, an analysis should be done to demonstrate how the degree(s) would help
the candidate to fulfill the job responsibilities (Thielen
& Neeser, 2019). Also, see if an institution
offers any benefits (such as tuition reimbursement) that would allow a
candidate to earn another degree while working, and if so include them in the
job posting.
The term “data intensive field” was often used to
describe the discipline of an equivalent (n
= 30) or additional degree (n = 27).
This term is often used in RDS. It is hypothesized that libraries are using
this term to denote that they would like a candidate with research data
experience but do not want to list specific disciplines. However, from a
DEI&A lens, this term is subjective, perhaps leaving a candidate unsure if
their degree meets this qualification. It is suggested to avoid this ambiguous
term in job postings. Further, individuals from underrepresented groups are
less likely to apply to positions if they do not meet all of the qualifications
(Mohr, 2014), so including ambiguous jargon will make them less likely to
apply.
Over a third of the data professional positions (n = 63) did not use the word “librarian”
in the job title; this may impact the degree qualifications. Of the positions
that include this word in the job title (n
= 117), 36% (n = 42) only accept an
MLIS degree. Conversely, of the positions without this word in the job title (n = 63), 2% (n = 1) only accept an MLIS degree. The difference in degree
qualifications is an excellent example of how libraries are writing job
positions that seek to diversify this sub-discipline.
Another indication that many libraries are looking to
recruit outside of the LIS pipeline is that of the positions that wanted
candidates to have previous academic library experience (n = 87), only 45% of these mentions (n = 39) occurred in the required qualifications section.
In addition to degrees, previous experiences mentioned in
the job positions also indicate an emphasis on areas traditionally considered
outside the scope of LIS. Experience working with research data was a common
qualification (n = 108), most
frequently listed as a required qualification. Finally, it is important to note
that almost 20% of the positions (n =
35) mentioned additional academic experiences (lab or research experience,
academic background, and others) as a required or preferred qualification. This
could be a way for a candidate to demonstrate knowledge of a particular area
without having an academic degree. Asking for these types of additional
academic experiences, instead of an additional degree, is another excellent way
to incorporate DEI&A principles into a job posting.
Overall, the research data activities that were most
frequently mentioned in the data professional job positions show that this
sub-discipline of academic librarianship values areas traditionally outside of
LIS (such as general data management, data repositories, and various types of
data analysis). General data management (n
= 155) was the second most commonly mentioned variable in the job positions,
second to the MLIS degree (n = 159).
Unsurprisingly, general data management was the most
frequently mentioned research data activities variable (n = 155). Interestingly, although general data management was most
commonly mentioned in the preferred qualifications (n = 73), “experience” (n
= 58) was the most frequent degree of complexity for this variable. This
suggests that libraries want a candidate with experience managing research
data, but know that it may not be feasible to ask for this as a required
qualification. Data repository is the variable with the highest number of
occurrences in the required qualifications section (n = 51). This shows that there is much interest in hiring
candidates with these skills and, therefore, offering these services on campus.
Overall, at least 1 of the 4 types of data analysis were mentioned in over 60%
of positions (n = 111; note that a
position could list multiple types). Assisting patrons with data analysis is
not a traditional area of LIS, but this result indicates that libraries
consider this an unmet need that they are trying to fulfill on their campuses.
Academic libraries are seeking to hire specialist data
professionals as well as generalist data professionals; 42% of the positions (n = 75) were seeking to hire a
specialist data professional, while the other 58% (n = 104) were seeking to hire a generalist. The occurrence of these
specialist data professional positions is another indication that libraries are
trying to recruit candidates from outside the traditional LIS pipeline.
Other Responsibilities and Skills
Many of the common variables in this section need further
explanation or different terminology entirely in order to recruit candidates
from outside of LIS. Public or customer service perspective was mentioned in
almost 40% of the postings (n = 69),
with two-thirds of those mentions in the required qualifications section.
Public or customer service is not necessarily a tenant of other fields like it
is in LIS, so providing further context to this requirement would give
candidates a better understanding of what this qualification entails and why it
is valued in this context.
Liaison duties are another example of library jargon in
these positions. Almost 30% of positions (n
= 51) had liaison duties. It is unlikely that someone outside of LIS would
understand what the term “liaison” means. Instead of saying “liaison to the
Political Science Department”, this could be rephrased as “Librarian for the
Political Science Department.” Small changes like this could have a huge impact
on whether candidates outside of LIS decide to apply for a position.
Additionally, of those listing liaison duties, three-fourths (n = 37) listed being a liaison to a
specific department(s). While listing these departments adds specificity to the
job position, it also may discourage applicants who do not have an academic
background or experience with the subject area(s). Writing something like
“departments will be assigned based on the candidate's background and
interests,” will help to recruit a more diverse candidate pool.
Instruction was mentioned in three-fourths of the
positions (n = 138, 76%) and
consultation was mentioned in two-thirds of the positions (n = 121, 67%). Both of these activities are common across job
sectors within the LIS profession. The high number of mentions of these two variables
shows that academic libraries, while embracing new ways of engaging with
patrons, believe that these traditional means of engagement are still vital
parts of the services they offer on campus.
It is encouraging to see that the mentions of DEI&A
have increased during the time period studied (Figure 11). However, there is
still room for improvement because, over the 5 years in this study, less than
half of the positions (n = 75, 42%)
included this variable. DEI&A related to the position was the focus, as
opposed to generic statements about the university or library, because this was
felt to be a demonstration of commitment to these principles rather than an Human Resources requirement. Having a required
qualification for all job positions related to DEI&A could concretize
academic libraries’ commitment to these principles and practices.
What is the Median Salary and Salary Range of Data
Professional Positions?
This study cannot give a definitive answer to this
research question because only 26% (n
= 47) of the job positions listed a quantitative salary value. Most frequently,
salary was not mentioned (n = 77,
43%). An additional third of the job positions (n = 57) only used qualitative descriptors for salary such as
“competitive” or “commensurate”. However, of the 47 positions listing a salary
value or range, the median salary was $57,000.
Not mentioning salary or only providing qualitative
salary descriptors is problematic from a DEI&A lens. This practice favors
those already working in academic libraries as they will have inside access to
and knowledge about common practices and resources, disadvantaging recent LIS
graduates, and those outside of the traditional LIS pipeline. For example,
those already working in academic libraries may have access to internal salary
documents and databases or be able to ask their professional networks about
salary information and practices. It also favors those working in the part of
the country where the job is located, because they may have an idea of data
professional salaries in their geographic area. For example, a competitive
salary at a university in San Francisco, California will be very different from
a competitive salary at a university in rural Michigan. Furthermore, these
practices could hinder a candidate’s ability to effectively negotiate salary
and individuals from underrepresented groups are less likely to negotiate
salaries (Silva & Galbraith, 2018). Listing a salary range indicates that
candidates can negotiate; not doing so furthers inequity between those who
already hold privilege from those who do not.
Additionally, the salary values listed for the job
positions may not be an accurate reflection of the person hired for a position.
A new employee’s salary could be higher or lower than the stated salary due to
their qualifications and experiences. A follow-up study could survey recently
hired data professionals, asking them for their salary upon hire.
Study Limitations
This study does have some limitations. First, the sources
of the job postings were chosen because they were known to attract postings for
data professionals in academic libraries. However, these sources were not
exhaustive for data professional job postings in academic libraries from
2013-2018. Additionally, job positions were only included in this study when
the full job posting was available. As noted above, seven job positions were
excluded because the full job postings were not available. This study also only
included job positions within the US; data professionals are a growing sector
in academic libraries worldwide. A follow-up study could analyze job postings
for data professionals outside of the US.
An inherent limitation of job posting analyses is that
job postings tend to be very aspirational, meaning that a data professional’s
actual responsibilities could vary greatly from those listed in the job
posting. A follow-up study could carry out in-depth interviews with data
professionals to compare how their actual responsibilities align with those in
the job posting.
Finally, this study is undercounting the number of data
professionals working in academic libraries, especially those working at
Master’s or Baccalaureate institutions. Many could have RDS roles or
responsibilities added to their job duties after hiring as data needs emerge on
campus. Additionally, at many small and mid-sized institutions, a librarian may
be responsible for providing RDS but this responsibility is not large enough to
be reflected in their job title (which was the initial screening mechanism to
determine if a position should be included in this study).
Conclusion
Studies such as this do not have an impact unless the
results are put into action. The following recommendations will help the reader
to use this data to take steps toward incorporating DEI&A principles and
practices into job postings:
●
Write each and
every sentence within a job posting using the lens of DEI&A principles and
practices
●
List a quantitative
salary value; it is a simple way to make the hiring process more transparent
and less prone to inequitable practices. Listing a range indicates the
possibility of negotiation, which is helpful for underrepresented groups
●
Carefully consider
which degrees to include as required or preferred qualifications. For example,
think critically about how an MLIS or an additional graduate degree would help
the applicant perform the job responsibilities. Many positions in this study
required an MLIS or asked for multiple degrees, which automatically limits the
applicant pool. Due to inequalities built into our societal and educational
systems, not everyone has access to attain a graduate degree. Consider
undergraduate degrees or academic background as a way for an applicant to demonstrate
expertise
●
Include DEI&A
as a required qualification in the job posting to demonstrate that the
institution is committed to hiring applicants who understand the value and
importance of DEI&A
●
Write the job
description that the candidate will perform; job postings should be realistic
not aspirational. One way to accomplish this is to limit preferred
qualifications
●
Finally, this data
can be used to initiate conversations; showing quantitative evidence of how
disparities are inadvertently woven into hiring practices and providing evidence based suggestions for improvement can be a valuable
tool for data-driving decision-making. This set of recommendations is also
transferable to other sub-disciplines of librarianship
Job postings are a small yet very important part of the
hiring process. It is hoped that this article will inspire reviews of hiring
processes as a whole. The data is openly available in the Dryad Repository https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.6078/D1K419; the authors strongly encourage other researchers to
further analyze this data.
The authors thank Kristin Briney
for reviewing the codebook, as well as Marie Kennedy, Abigail Goben, and Tina Griffin for reviewing a draft of this
article and providing valuable feedback.
References
ACRL Research Planning and
Review Committee. (2016). 2016 top trends in academic libraries: A review of
the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College
& Research Libraries News, 77(6), 274-281. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.77.6.9505
ACRL Planning and Review
Committee. (2018). 2018 top ten trends in academic libraries: A review of the
trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College
& Research Libraries News, 79(6), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.6.286
Association of College &
Research Libraries Science & Technology Section [Electronic mailing list]. (n.d.). Retrieved from lists.ala.org/sympa/info/sts-l
Brown, S. (2019). Want a more
diverse campus? Start at the top. In The Chronicle
of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Want-a-More-Diverse-Campus-/247285
Code4Lib Jobs [Electronic mailing list]. (n.d.). Retrieved from jobs.code4lib.org
Chen, H., & Zhang, Y.
(2017). Educating data management professionals: A content analysis of job
descriptions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.11.002
0099-1333
Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and
libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship
and Information Science, 46(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
Digital Library Federation Job
Board [Electronic mailing list]. (n.d.). Retrieved from jobs.diglib.org/
Educause Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/about/diversity-equity-and-inclusion
Fernandes, J.D., Sarabipour, S., Smith, C.T., Niemi, N.M., Jadavji, N.M., Kozik, A.J., Holehouse, A.S., Pejaver, V., Symmons, O., Filho, A.W.B., & Haage,
A. (2020). A survey-based analysis of the academic job market. eLife, 9:e54097. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54097
Guest, G., MacQueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. Los
Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Hall-Ellis, S. D. (2005). Descriptive impressions of
entry-level cataloger positions as reflected in American Libraries, AutoCAT, and the Colorado State Library Jobline,
2000-2003. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 40(2), 33-72. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v40n02_05
Hall-Ellis, S. D. (2006).
Descriptive impressions of managerial and supervisory cataloger positions as
reflected in American Libraries, AutoCAT, and the
Colorado State Library Jobline, 2000-2004: A content
analysis of education, competencies, and experience. Cataloging &
Classification Quarterly, 42(1), 55-92. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v42n01_06
Indiana University. (2017).
About the Carnegie Classification. In The
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from
http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/
International Association for
Social Science Information Service & Technology Jobs Portal [Electronic mailing list]. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://iassistdata.org/jobs-repository/
Internet Archive WayBack Machine. (n.d.).
Retrieved from archive.org/web
Jardine, F. M., & Zerhusen, E. K. (2015). Charting the course of equity and
inclusion in LIS through iDiversity. The Library
Quarterly, 85(2), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1086/680156
Kim, J., & Angnakoon, P. (2016). Research using job advertisements: A
methodological assessment. Library & Information Science Research, 38(4),
327-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.11.006
Kim, J., Warga, E., & Moen, W. (2013).
Competencies required for digital curation: An analysis of job advertisements. International
Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.242
Mohr, T. S. (2014). Why women
don’t apply for jobs unless they’re 100% qualified. In Harvard Business
Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobs-unless-theyre-100-qualified
Oh, B., & Kim, C. (2020).
Broken promise of college? New educational sorting mechanisms for
intergenerational association in the 21st century. Social Science Research, 86(102375),
1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102375
Research Data Access & Preservation
Association [Electronic mailing list]. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://rdapassociation.org
Si, L., Zhuang, X., Xing, W.,
& Guo, W. (2013). The cultivation of scientific data specialists: Development
of LIS education oriented to e-science service requirements. Library Hi
Tech, 31(4), 700-724.
https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2013-0070
Silva, E., & Galbraith, Q.
(2018). Salary negotiation patterns between women and men in academic
libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 324-335. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.3.324
Soto, M. & Yao, C. (2010). Retention of women of
color in STEM doctoral programs. Proceedings
of the 29th Annual Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult,
Continuing, Community, and Extension Education. East Lansing, Michigan,
207-213.
Tenopir, C., Sandusky, R.
J., Allard, S., & Birch, B. (2013). Academic librarians and research data
services: Preparation and attitudes. IFLA Journal, 39(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035212473089
Tenopir, C., Kaufman, J., Sandusky, R., & Pollock, C.
(2019). Research data services in academic libraries: Where are we today?
[White paper]. In Choice. Retrieved from https://choice360.org/librarianship/whitepaper
Thielen, J., & Neeser, A. (2019).
How you can write more inclusive data practitioner job postings. Journal of
eScience Librarianship, 8(2), e1167. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2019.1167
University of California
Berkeley. (2018). Berkeley strategic plan. In Berkeley University of
California. Retrieved from https://strategicplan.berkeley.edu/publications/
University of Michigan. (2020).
Rackham Professional Development Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Certificate.
In Rackham Graduate School. Retrieved from https://rackham.umich.edu/professional-development/dei-certificate/
Willis, D. S. (2017). Getting
up to speed on diversity. In Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2017/08/21/how-graduate-students-can-demonstrate-commitment-diversity-job-interviews-essay
Xia, J., & Wang, M. (2014). Competencies and responsibilities of social
science data librarians: An analysis of job descriptions. College &
Research Libraries, 75(3), 362-388. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl13-435
Yoon, K., Hulscher,
L., & Dols, R. (2016). Accessibility and
diversity in library and information science: Inclusive information
architecture for library websites. The Library Quarterly, 86(2),
213-229. https://doi.org/10.1086/685399
Appendix A
Metadata about Data Professional Job Postings
(Note, this appendix only includes the 177
job postings analyzed in this study)
University Name |
Carnegie Classification |
Position Title |
Posting Date |
Notes |
American University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Research Data Librarian |
2013-01 |
|
Auburn University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian |
2017-03 |
|
Boston College |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data and Visualization Librarian |
2016-12 |
|
Brown University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Scientific Data Management Specialist |
2013-11 |
|
Brown University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Scientific Data Curator |
2013-03 |
|
Bryn Mawr College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Social Sciences and Data Librarian |
2018-02 |
|
California State University Northridge |
Master's Colleges & Universities:
Larger Programs |
Business & Data Librarian |
2013-01 |
|
Carnegie Mellon University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2014-05 |
|
Case Western Reserve University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
Research Data Specialist |
2018-01 |
|
Colby College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Social Sciences Data Librarian |
2014-02 |
|
Colorado State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Specialist |
2017-11 |
|
Colorado State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Specialist |
2016-01 |
|
Columbia University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Support & Data Services
Librarian |
2014-04 |
|
Columbia University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Support & Data Services
Librarian |
2016-10 |
|
Columbia University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2014-12 |
|
Columbia University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services & Emerging Technologies
Librarian |
2014-05 |
|
Columbia University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Support & Data Services
Librarian |
2015-04 |
|
Cornell University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Science and Geospatial Data
Librarian |
2017-09 |
|
Cornell University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data and Environmental Sciences
Librarian |
2014-02 |
|
CUNY Graduate School and University Center |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian |
2014-12 |
|
Dartmouth College |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data & Visualization Librarian |
2015-12 |
|
DePaul University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Services & Government Information
Librarian |
2016-06 |
|
Drake University |
Doctoral/Professional Schools |
Data and Business Librarian |
2015-04 |
|
Drexel University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director, Data & Digital Stewardship |
2015-10 |
|
Drexel University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director, Informatics for Research
Engagement |
2014-02 |
|
Duke University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Senior Research Data Management Consultant |
2016-08 |
This posting was for two positions |
East Carolina University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-03 |
|
Florida Institute of Technology |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Research Data Specialist |
2014-11 |
|
Florida Institute of Technology |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian |
2018-05 |
|
Florida State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Research Librarian |
2013-11 |
|
Florida State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Sciences Research & Data
Librarian |
2016-10 |
|
George Washington University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-10 |
|
George Washington University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2014-07 |
|
Georgia Southern University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Discovery Services and Data Curation
Librarian |
2014-12 |
|
Georgia State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Team Leader, Research Data Services |
2016-01 |
|
Georgia State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Quantitative Data Specialist for the Social
Sciences |
2017-08 |
|
Georgia State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Business Data Services Librarian |
2014-06 |
|
Harvard University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Librarian for the Social Sciences and
Visualization |
2014-10 |
|
Harvard University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian for the
Sciences |
2018-04 |
|
Harvard University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data & Collections Librarian |
2017-05 |
|
Indiana University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian |
2016-06 |
|
Indiana University Bloomington |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian |
2015-08 |
|
Indiana University Bloomington |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian and Head
of Scholarly Communication Department |
2016-05 |
|
Johns Hopkins University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Services Manager |
2015-12 |
|
Johns Hopkins University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Informationist |
2016-03 |
|
Johns Hopkins University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Manager |
2017-01 |
|
Johns Hopkins University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Consultant |
2015-04 |
|
Johns Hopkins University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Specialist |
2016-02 |
|
Kenyon College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Social Sciences and Data Librarian |
2016-03 |
|
Lehigh University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Business/Data Librarian |
2015-11 |
|
Lewis & Clark College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Science & Data Services Librarian |
2014-10 |
|
Louisiana State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2015-01 |
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Program Head, Data Management Services |
2016-11 |
|
Michigan State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian |
2016-04 |
|
Middlebury College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Data Services Librarian |
2015-05 |
|
Montana State University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Management Librarian |
2013-08 |
|
New York University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Knowledge Management Librarian |
2014-10 |
|
New York University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2015-03 |
|
New York University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian |
2014-11 |
|
North Carolina State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data & Infrastructure Librarian |
2018-03 |
|
North Carolina State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Librarian for Engineering and
Biotechnology |
2015-09 |
|
Northwestern University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Scientist |
2017-03 |
|
Oakland University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Research Data Librarian |
2015-11 |
|
Occidental College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Data and Information Specialist for the
Social Sciences |
2017-08 |
|
Ohio State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Services Librarian |
2013-05 |
|
Oregon Health & Science University |
Special Focus Four-Year: Medical Schools
& Centers |
Basic Science Liaison/Research Data
Management Librarian |
2015-12 |
|
Oregon State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Specialist |
2015-12 |
|
Pennsylvania State University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Science Data Librarian |
2014-11 |
|
Princeton University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Specialist |
2013-06 |
|
Princeton University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Interdisciplinary Quantitative Research
Librarian |
2015-08 |
|
Purdue University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Repository Outreach Specialist |
2015-08 |
|
Purdue University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Specialist |
2015-02 |
|
Purdue University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
Digital Data Repository Specialist |
2014-12 |
|
Reed College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Data Services Librarian |
2015-07 |
|
Rice University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data and Government Information Librarian |
2017-11 |
|
Rice University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Head, Kelley Center for Government
Information, Data & Geospatial Services |
2014-06 |
|
Rutgers University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2013-06 |
|
San Diego State University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Social Science & Data Librarian |
2018-01 |
|
San Jose State University |
Master's Colleges & Universities:
Larger Programs |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-05 |
|
Southern California University of Health
Sciences |
Special Focus Four-Year: Other Health
Professions Schools |
Knowledge Management & Data Specialist |
2015-09 |
|
Stanford University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services and Visualization Librarian |
2017-05 |
|
Stanford University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Engineering Librarian for Data and
Collections |
2018-06 |
|
Temple University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research and Data Services Librarian |
2018-05 |
|
Texas A&M University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian |
2016-09 |
|
Tufts University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Librarian for Research Data |
2016-09 |
|
Tufts University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Science Data Librarian |
2017-05 |
|
University of Arizona |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian |
2017-03 |
|
University of Arkansas at Little Rock |
Doctoral Universities: High Research Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2018-06 |
|
University of California - Irvine |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
E-Research and Digital Scholarship Services
Librarian |
2014-10 |
|
University of California - Los Angeles |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Sciences Data Informationist |
2016-11 |
|
University of California - Los Angeles |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Grand Challenges Data Administrator |
2016-09 |
|
University of California - Los Angeles |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director of UCLA Libraries Social Science
Data Archive |
2016-06 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services and Collections Librarian |
2014-03 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director, Research Data Curation Services |
2013-01 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Metadata Specialist |
2018-06 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Science Librarian |
2017-09 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director, Research Data Curation Services |
2013-01 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Metadata Librarian |
2017-11 |
|
University of California - San Diego |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Curation Program Technical
Analyst |
2013-07 |
|
University of California Berkeley |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Science Data & Engineering Librarian |
2015-07 |
|
University of California Berkeley |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Business & Data Librarian |
2015-08 |
|
University of California Berkeley |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Service Design
Analyst |
2015-01 |
|
University of California Berkeley |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-01 |
|
University of California Davis |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Associate Director, Data Management Program |
2015-08 |
|
University of California Davis |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
Data Management Analyst |
2017-03 |
|
University of California San Francisco |
Special Focus Four-Year: Medical Schools
& Centers |
Data Services and Assessment Librarian |
2016-12 |
|
University of California Santa Barbara |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Humanities Data Curator |
2015-09 |
|
University of California Santa Barbara |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Geospatial Data Curator |
2013-08 |
|
University of California Santa Barbara |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services and Digital Scholarship
Librarian |
2018-05 |
|
University of Chicago |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Biomedical Data Librarian |
2017-12 |
|
University of Chicago |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Science Data and Sociology Librarian |
2017-04 |
|
University of Chicago |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Research Services and Biomedical
Librarian |
2017-04 |
|
University of Colorado Boulder |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-07 |
|
University of Florida |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Librarian |
2015-04 |
|
University of Houston |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Science Data Librarian |
2014-03 |
|
University of Houston |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2016-11 |
|
University of Houston |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Management Librarian |
2018-05 |
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director, Research Data Service and
Open-Rank Professor |
2013-10 |
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Specialist |
2014-11 |
This posting was for two positions |
University of Iowa |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Manager |
2017-02 |
|
University of Kansas |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2013-06 |
|
University of Maryland |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-01 |
|
University of Maryland |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2018-07 |
|
University of Massachusetts Amherst |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-05 |
|
University of Miami |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2016-09 |
|
University of Michigan |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Workflows Specialist |
2017-01 |
|
University of Michigan |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Curation Librarian |
2014-11 |
|
University of Michigan |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Services Manager |
2013-12 |
|
University of Michigan |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2017-07 |
|
University of Michigan |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Health Sciences Data Services Informationist |
2015-11 |
|
University of Minnesota |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Biosciences Liaison Librarian and
Scientific Data Curator |
2017-06 |
|
University of Minnesota |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Informatics/Data Services Specialist |
2013-06 |
|
University of Minnesota |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Public Health Liaison and Data Curation
Specialist |
2015-10 |
|
University of Nebraska - Lincoln |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2016-08 |
|
University of Nebraska - Lincoln |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2013-12 |
|
University of Nevada Las Vegas |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Social Sciences Data Librarian |
2014-08 |
|
University of New Hampshire |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Business and Data Reference Librarian |
2015-03 |
|
University of New Hampshire |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Services Librarian |
2018-01 |
|
University of New Mexico |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Director of Research Data Services |
2013-12 |
|
University of New Mexico |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2017-07 |
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Repository Librarian |
2015-04 |
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Research and Data Support Coordinator |
2013-10 |
|
University of North Carolina Wilmington |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Digital Program and Data Management
Librarian |
2013-03 |
|
University of Notre Dame |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Digital Library Data Curation Developer |
2015-07 |
|
University of Pennsylvania |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Business & Data Analysis Librarian |
2018-04 |
|
University of Pennsylvania |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Scholarly Communications & Data Curation
Librarian |
2016-03 |
|
University of Pittsburgh |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2017-07 |
|
University of Pittsburgh |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2018-06 |
|
University of Rhode Island |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2016-05 |
|
University of Rochester |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Science & Engineering Outreach
Librarian (Data) |
2018-01 |
|
University of Tennessee |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Curation Librarian |
2013-03 |
|
University of Texas at Arlington |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data & eScience Librarian |
2014-12 |
|
University of Texas at Arlington |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Sciences Data Librarian |
2014-11 |
|
University of Texas at Austin |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Coordinator |
2015-09 |
|
University of Vermont |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Science and Data Librarian |
2017-02 |
|
University of Virginia |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Senior Research Data Scientist |
2014-05 |
|
University of Virginia |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data and Geographical Information Librarian |
2013-01 |
|
University of Virginia |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Specialist |
2017-02 |
|
University of Virginia |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Clinical Data Research Specialist |
2017-02 |
|
University of Washington |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Management Librarian |
2015-05 |
|
University of Wisconsin Madison |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Science & Engineering Data &
Information Specialist |
2018-04 |
This posting was for two positions |
University of Wisconsin Madison |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Digital Curation Coordinator |
2017-06 |
|
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity |
Data Services Librarian |
2013-07 |
|
Upstate Medical University |
Special Focus Four-Year: Medical Schools
& Centers |
Data Services Librarian |
2018-05 |
|
Vanderbilt University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Business and Data Analysis Librarian |
2016-12 |
|
Vassar College |
Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences
Focus |
Social Sciences and Data Librarian |
2016-03 |
|
Villanova University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Social Sciences and Data Services Librarian |
2015-12 |
|
Virginia Commonwealth University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Librarian |
2017-05 |
|
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data and Informatics Consultant |
2013-12 |
|
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Social Science Data Consultant & Data
Educator Coordinator |
2017-04 |
|
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Consultant |
2014-05 |
|
Washington University in St. Louis |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Specialist |
2015-04 |
|
Western Michigan University |
Doctoral Universities: High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian |
2018-02 |
|
Yale University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian |
2017-11 |
|
Yale University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Data Librarian for the Health Sciences |
2018-03 |
|
Yale University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Research Data Support Specialist |
2016-07 |
|
Yale University |
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research
Activity |
Librarian for Finance, Accounting &
Business Data |
2018-04 |
|
Appendix B
Codebook
|
Variable |
Attributes |
|||||||||
Education, experience, and salary |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
MLIS degree |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Equivalent degree |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Equivalent degree level* |
Not applicable |
Bachelor's |
Master's |
Doctorate |
Advanced |
Not specified |
|
|
||
|
Equivalent degree discipline(s)* |
Not applicable |
Arts & Humanities |
Social Sciences |
STEM |
Data Intensive/Data Science |
Business |
Relevant |
Not specified |
||
|
Academic library experience |
No |
1-2 years |
3-5 years |
5+ years |
Length not specified |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Research data experience |
No |
1-2 years |
3-5 years |
5+ years |
Length not specified |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Supervisory experience |
No |
1-2 years |
3-5 years |
5+ years |
Length not specified |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Additional experience or degree |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Additional degree level* |
Not applicable |
Bachelor's |
Master's |
Doctorate or PhD |
Advanced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Discipline of additional degree*] |
Not applicable |
Arts & Humanities |
Social Sciences |
STEM |
Data Intensive, Data Science, and others. |
Business |
Relevant |
Not specified |
||
|
Additional experience* |
Not applicable |
Significant coursework or academic
background |
Subject knowledge |
Lab or research experience |
Other, specify: [free text] |
|
|
|
||
|
Carnegie Classification of Institution |
Baccalaureate |
Master's |
Doctoral |
Special Focus |
|
|
|
|
||
|
[For doctoral institutions, specify the
research intensity level] |
Not applicable |
Very high |
High |
Doctoral/Professional |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Salary information* |
Not applicable |
Commensurate |
Competitive |
Other, specify: [free text] |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Salary range or minimum |
Not applicable |
[Exact salary values] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Research Data Activities |
|
||||||||||
Management |
|
||||||||||
|
General Data Management |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Data Management Plans |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
Discovery and Re-Use |
|
||||||||||
|
Data Discovery |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
Collection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Data Organization |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Data Documentation |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
Storage |
|
||||||||||
|
Data Storage |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Data Security |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
Analysis |
|
||||||||||
|
Data Visualization |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
General Data Analysis |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Statistical Data Analysis |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Spatial Data Analysis |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Qualitative Data Analysis |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Programming Languages |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
[List programming languages] |
Not applicable |
[List programming languages] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Sharing |
|
||||||||||
|
Data Sharing |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
Preservation |
|
||||||||||
|
Data Repository |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Data Curation |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
||||||||||
|
Data Policy |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Responsibilities or Skills |
|
||||||||||
|
Instruction |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Consultation |
Not applicable |
Implied |
Familiarity |
Knowledge |
Experienced |
|
|
|
||
|
[Location in job posting] |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Public/customer service perspective |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Faculty status |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tenure requirement |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Research/Publishing requirement |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Liaison to department |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
[Whether depts. are listed] |
Depts. as assigned |
Specific depts. listed |
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
[List all depts. specified] |
Not applicable |
[List specific depts.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Research data role focused on specific discipline(s) |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
[Whether disciplines are listed] |
Disciplines as assigned |
Specific discipline listed |
Not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
[List all disciplines specified] |
Not applicable |
[List specific disciplines] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Assessment |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Scholarly Communication |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Outreach |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Collaboration with other campus units |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
|
Diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility |
Not applicable |
Description |
Respon. |
Preferred Qual. |
Required Qual. |
|
|
|
||
NOTES
* = select all attributes that
apply
Synonyms for attributes
Doctorate = terminal
Advanced = graduate, professional
Knowledge = understanding, competent, competence
Experience = ability, demonstrated ability, aptitude
Relevant = related, appropriate, comparable
Commensurate = dependent
Hierarchy for location
Required qual > Preferred qual >
Responsibilities > Description
Operational Definitions
|
Variable |
Definition |
When to Use |
When NOT to Use |
How to Use |
Definition source |
||||
Experience, education and salary |
||||||||||
|
MLIS degree |
Master's of Library or Information Science
degree (often abbreviated MLIS, MLS, MSI, and others) |
Any reference of a Master's degree in
Library and Information Science |
Graduate degree other than a MLIS (or
equivalent); Undergraduate degree(s) |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Equivalent degree |
A degree (besides a MLIS) that provides a
relevant educational background |
If phase like “equivalent degree” is used
to describe the educational background needed for the position |
Additional graduate degree or undergraduate
degree; MLIS degree |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Equivalent degree level(s) |
The level of an equivalent degree that
provides a relevant educational background |
If the level of the degree is specified in
the phase “equivalent degree” |
Additional graduate degree or undergraduate
degree; MLIS degree |
Code level of degree: Not applicable,
Bachelor's, Master's, Doctorate, Advanced, Not specified |
-- |
||||
|
Equivalent degree discipline(s) |
The discipline of the degree (besides a
MLIS) that provides a relevant educational background |
If the discipline of the degree is
specified in the phase “equivalent degree” |
Additional graduate degree or undergraduate
degree; MLIS degree |
Code for all disciplines specified: Not
applicable, Arts & Humanities, Social Sciences, STEM, Data Intensive/Data
Science, Business, Relevant, Not specified |
-- |
||||
|
Academic library experience |
Experience working in an academic library |
Any experience working in an academic
library (including work as a student) |
Experience working in any setting outside
of an academic library |
1) Code the length of experience (# of
years) or length not specified (if not stated, code “No”); 2) Code where it
occurs in the job posting (required qualifications, preferred qualifications,
responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Research data experience |
Professional experience working with
research data, either inside or outside of a library context |
Work experience relating to any aspect of
the research data lifecycle, either in an academic library or outside (i.e.,
experience as a researcher) |
Professional experience working in any
other area (either inside or outside of a library); supervisory experience |
1) Code the length of experience (# of
years) or length not specified (if not stated, code “No”); 2) Code where it
occurs in the job posting (required qualifications, preferred qualifications,
responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Supervisory experience |
Professional experience working as a
supervisor or manager |
Supervisory or managerial experience |
Other types of experience |
1) Code the length of experience (# of
years) or length not specified (if not stated, code “No”); 2) Code where it
occurs in the job posting (required qualifications, preferred qualifications,
responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Additional degree |
Experience or degree (undergraduate or
graduate) mentioned in addition to the MLIS or equivalent degree |
Experience or degree (undergraduate or
graduate) mentioned in addition to the MLIS or equivalent degree |
MLIS degree; equivalent degree |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Additional degree level |
Level of degree (undergraduate or graduate)
in any discipline other than library and information science |
Level of degree (undergraduate or graduate)
in any discipline other than library and information science |
MLIS degree; equivalent degree |
1) Code level of degree: Not applicable,
Bachelor's, Master's, Doctorate or PhD, Advanced; 2) Code for all disciplines
specified: Not applicable, Arts & Humanities, Social Sciences, STEM, Data
Intensive/Data Science, Business, Relevant, Not specified |
-- |
||||
|
Additional experience |
Additional types of academic or
professional experience |
Additional types of academic or
professional experience |
Any mentions of degrees |
Code for all experiences specified: Not
applicable, Significant coursework or academic background, Subject knowledge,
Lab or research experience, other, specify: [free text] |
-- |
||||
|
Carnegie Classification of Institution |
The Carnegie Classification of the
institution which can be found at:
http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php |
Identify name of the posting institution
and then look up the Carnegie Classification on this website:
http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php |
-- |
1) Code this classification by looking up
the institution's name on this website: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php;
2) Code the level of research activity for Doctoral-granting universities or
Not applicable |
-- |
||||
|
Salary
information |
Salary information listed in the job
posting |
Description of salary information such as
“competitive” or “commensurate” |
Numerical salary values; Description of any
benefits |
Code the salary descriptors used:
commensurate, competitive, other, specify: [free text] |
-- |
||||
|
Salary range or
minimum |
Numerical salary values given |
Exact numerical salary values given
(minimum, maximum, range, and others) |
Salary descriptors such as “competitive” or
“commensurate”; descriptions of any benefits |
Code exact salary values given (the salary
range or minimum) or Not applicable |
-- |
||||
Research Data Activities |
||||||||||
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Data Management |
Process of controlling & managing data,
and its associated actions, created during planning and acquisition phases of
observation and research |
Any reference to the term “data management”
or the actions associated with data management |
Data management plans or other data plans
(data sharing plans, data security plans, and others) |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
|||||
|
Data Management Plans |
A formal statement describing how research
data will be managed and documented throughout a research project and the
terms regarding the subsequent deposit of the data with a data repository for
long-term management and preservation |
Any reference to data management plans,
DMPs, data sharing plans or any other type of written data plan required for
a grant application |
Data management |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
|||||
Discovery and Re-Use |
||||||||||
|
Data Discovery |
Process of query or search to find
(research) data of interest |
Any reference to locating, discovering or
re-using existing datasets (including research data, reference data,
government data, and others). Other terms could include data access and data
identification |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Collection |
||||||||||
|
Data Organization |
Process of creating a logical system for
storing data files and folders |
Any reference to creating a data file
organization system; Examples of organization technique: file naming
conventions and file structures |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Data Documentation |
The metadata or information about a data
product (e.g., data table, database) that enables one to understand and use the
data. Such information may include the scientific context underlying the data
as well as who collected the data, why the data were collected, and where,
when, and how the data were collected; Metadata: data about data, data that
defines and describes the characteristics of other data |
Any reference to creating documentation
(print or electronic format) about data or documenting data (including
metadata and metadata standards); Reference to cleaning or cleansing research
data prior to sharing, publishing, and others; Other terms: data quality |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
Definition of metadata: CASRAI Dictionary
Research Data Domain; Definition of documentation: DataONE
Best Practices Primer |
||||
Storage |
||||||||||
|
Data Storage |
Recording of data on a storage media |
Any reference to how and where to store data,
including storage media, storage locations, storage hardware or storage
devices |
Data preservation |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Data Security |
Measures taken to protect data from
unauthorized access, change, destruction, or other threats |
Any reference to data security, preventing unauthorized
access, and others. |
De-identification of data |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
Adapted from
Society of American Archivists' definition |
||||
Analysis |
||||||||||
|
Data Visualization |
Visual representations of data |
Any reference to data visualization or
visualization software (such as Tableau, and others.) |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
General Data Analysis |
Analyzing data to search for trends or
patterns |
Any reference to data analysis that DOES
NOT specify one or more of the three specific types listed below;
quantitative data analysis |
Spatial, geospatial, GIS, statistical, or
qualitative analysis |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Statistical Data Analysis |
Using statistics to analyze data for
patterns and trends |
Any reference to statistical analysis
methods or tests; Common tests include ANOVA, Chi-square tests, T-tests,
Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis. References to common software packages
(such as SAS, SPSS, and others) |
Spatial, geospatial or GIS analysis |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Spatial Data Analysis |
Type of geographical analysis which seeks
to explain patterns of human behavior and its spatial expression in terms of
mathematics and geometry, that is, locational analysis |
Any reference to spatial analysis,
geospatial, or GIS analysis; Mentions of using specific software such as
ArcGIS |
Statistical analysis |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
Dartmouth Libraries Geospatial Information Systems
research guide |
||||
|
Qualitative Data Analysis |
The identification, examination, and
interpretation of patterns and themes in textual data and determining how
these patterns and themes help answer the research questions at hand |
Any reference to qualitative data analysis,
including text mining; Mentions of qualitative analysis software such as
NVivo, Dedoose, ATLAS.ti,
and others. |
Any analysis of quantitative data (statistical
or spatial) |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
Pell Institute Evaluation Tool Kit: Analyzing
Qualitative Data |
||||
|
Programming Languages |
If the position needs to know one or more
computer programming languages (Python, C, Java, HTML, and others) |
Specific programming language(s) are
mentioned |
Providing programming for the campus
community (i.e., planning events) |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description); 3) List the
specific programming languages mentioned (if none, use “Not applicable”) |
-- |
||||
Sharing |
||||||||||
|
Data Sharing |
The practice of making data available for
discovery and reuse. This may be done, for example, by depositing the data in
a repository or through data publication |
Any reference to sharing or publishing
research data (outside of a research team) through a variety of possible
avenues (data repository, data journal, and others); Mention on assigning
persistent identifiers (PURLs, DOIs, and others). Other terms include data
publishing and data dissemination |
Sharing within a research group or
collaboration |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
|||||
Preservation |
||||||||||
|
Data Repository |
A digital archive that provides services
for the storage and retrieval of digital content |
Any reference to using, creating,
facilitating, and others. A data repository or data archive; other terms
could include collecting datasets |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
Data Curation Network: Data Curation Terms and
Activities Report |
||||
|
Data Curation |
The encompassing work and actions taken by
curators of a data repository in order to provide meaningful and enduring
access to data. These activities include ingest, appraisal, curation, access
and preservation |
Any reference to data curation, curating
research data or related data curation activities; Other term: data curator |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
Data Curation Network: Data Curation Terms and
Activities Report |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other |
||||||||||
|
Data Policy |
An organization’s stated data/information
management processes designed to assist and protect research data assets |
Any reference to data policies (a library's
policies, university's policies, funder policies, and others) including data
management plan policies, deposit policies, intellectual property policies,
data curation policies, and others |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other Responsibilities or Skills |
||||||||||
|
Instruction |
Teaching (online or in-person) researchers
about any research data management activities (including the variables listed
in the Research Data Activities section of this codebook) |
Reference to teaching (in-person or online)
sessions, workshops, courses, and others on research data management;
Creating or maintaining tutorials, online modules, and others for
asynchronous instruction |
Instruction for liaison, scholarly
communication or other non-research data roles/responsibilities |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Data Consultation |
A meeting in which a data librarian or
research data staff and patron discuss research data management issues and
potential solutions |
Any reference to providing consultations or
reference interactions for patrons to discuss research data management issues |
-- |
1) Code degree of complexity sought for
this variable (Not applicable, implied, familiarity, knowledge, experienced);
2) Code where it occurs in the job posting (required qualifications,
preferred qualifications, responsibilities, description) |
-- |
||||
|
Public/customer service perspective |
Mindset focused on providing high quality
public/ customer service |
Description of a mindset focused on
providing high quality public/ customer service |
-- |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Faculty status |
The position has faculty status at the
institution (as opposed to being staff, academic staff, and others) |
Faculty status is mentioned |
Tenure-track position |
Code if this variable appears in the job
posting (Yes, No) |
-- |
||||
|
Tenure requirement |
If this position is a tenure-track position
at the institution |
Tenure-track is mentioned |
Status at the institution (faculty, staff,
academic staff, and others) |
Code if this variable appears in the job
posting (Yes, No) |
-- |
||||
|
Research/Publishing requirement |
If the successful candidate needs to have a
demonstrated record of research/publishing (books, book chapters, journal
articles, and others) or they demonstrate the ability to do research/ publish
in the future |
Any mention that scholarly research/
publishing is a requirement of the position |
Publishing data for patrons; need to know
about current topics in scholarly communication |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Liaison to department |
This position will serve as the library
liaison to one or more departments or units at the institution, in addition
to their research data responsibilities; provide reference/ research
assistance, instruction, outreach, collection development, and others |
Liaison activities or work are mentioned
(either with or without naming specific departments or units that the
position will be the liaison to) |
Collaboration with other campus
departments/ units; Research data role focused on specific disciplines |
1) Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description); 2) Whether specific departments are listed in the job posting
(depts. as assigned, specific depts. listed, not applicable); 3) List the specific
depts (free text, not applicable) |
-- |
||||
|
Research data
role focused on specific discipline(s) |
This position focuses on the research data
management needs of specific disciplines, schools, colleges, and others |
This position focuses on the research data management
needs of specific disciplines, schools, colleges, and others |
Liaison to department; Collaboration with
other campus departments/units |
1) Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description); 2) Whether specific disciplines are listed in the job posting
(depts. as assigned, specific depts. listed, not applicable); 3) List the
specific disciplines (free text, not applicable) |
-- |
||||
|
Assessment |
If the position will be involved in assessment
projects, relating to the research data responsibilities |
Assessment is mentioned relating to
research data responsibilities (such as assessment of patron satisfaction
with the library's research data services) |
Assessment activities related to responsibilities
outside of research data responsibilities (such as service work, liaison
work, and others) |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Scholarly Communication |
If the position needs to know about the
current landscape of scholarly communication |
Mentions of knowing about scholarly
communication |
If the position required to publish |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Outreach |
If the position will be conducting outreach
to the campus community (outside of the library) to advertise the library's
research data services |
Mention of outreach, marketing or advertising
the library's research data services |
Outreach for responsibilities outside of
research data responsibilities (such as liaison activities) |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Collaboration with other campus units |
If this position will collaborate with
campus units outside of the library (such as IT, research office, Provost's
office, and others) on research data projects |
Collaboration with campus units outside of
the library |
Liaison duties to campus departments/units |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
|
Diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility |
If the applicant needs to know about and
recognize the importance of these issues within a library or university |
Any mention of applicant being committed or
recognizing the importance of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility
(such as having to submit a Diversity Statement as part of the application or
having a commitment to fostering these on campus) |
Language about the university's commitment
to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility |
Code where it occurs in the job posting
(required qualifications, preferred qualifications, responsibilities,
description) |
-- |
||||
Sources
Sources of some Variables |
|
Hall-Ellis (2005). |
|
Hall-Ellis (2006). |
|
Chen, H. L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Educating data
management professionals: A content analysis of job descriptions. The Journal
of Academic Librarianship, 43(1), 18-24. |
|
Xia & Wang (2014). |
|
Indiana University. (2017). Institution
Lookup. In The Carnegie Classification of
Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/lookup/lookup.php |
|
Sources of some Operational Definitions |
|
DataONE Best Practices Primer |
https://www.dataone.org/sites/all/documents/DataONE_BP_Primer_020212.pdf |
Research Data Alliance (RDA) Term Definition Tool |
|
CASRAI Dictionary Research Data Domain |
|
Society of American Archivists Glossary |
|
Dartmouth Libraries Geographical Information Systems
research guide |
|
Pell Institute Evaluation Toolkit: Analyzing
Qualitative Data |
http://toolkit.pellinstitute.org/evaluation-guide/analyze/analyze-qualitative-data/ |
Data Curation Network: Data Curation Terms and
Activities report |
Appendix C
Supplementary Table
Summary of mentions of 19 research data
management activities: A) degree of complexity sought and B) location in the
job posting.
A)
|
Experience |
Knowledge |
Familiarity |
Implied |
Not applicable |
General data management |
58 |
31 |
10 |
55 |
26 |
Statistical data analysis |
45 |
12 |
10 |
9 |
104 |
General data analysis |
39 |
7 |
14 |
18 |
102 |
Data repository |
34 |
32 |
17 |
38 |
59 |
Data curation |
33 |
27 |
1 |
40 |
79 |
Data visualization |
31 |
7 |
7 |
29 |
106 |
Data documentation |
25 |
33 |
10 |
28 |
84 |
Spatial data analysis |
24 |
10 |
7 |
5 |
134 |
Qualitative data analysis |
21 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
144 |
Programming languages |
21 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
144 |
Data management plans |
18 |
13 |
5 |
40 |
104 |
Data discovery |
13 |
11 |
6 |
67 |
83 |
Data sharing |
7 |
7 |
7 |
64 |
95 |
Data policy |
6 |
2 |
3 |
38 |
131 |
Data storage |
2 |
6 |
1 |
22 |
149 |
Data organization |
1 |
1 |
0 |
17 |
161 |
Data security |
0 |
3 |
3 |
11 |
163 |
B)
|
Required qualifications |
Preferred qualifications |
Responsibilities |
Description |
Not applicable |
Data repository |
51 |
32 |
33 |
5 |
59 |
Statistical data analysis |
45 |
23 |
5 |
3 |
104 |
Data documentation |
38 |
30 |
21 |
7 |
84 |
Programming languages |
33 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
119 |
Data visualization |
30 |
15 |
26 |
3 |
106 |
24 |
12 |
33 |
7 |
104 |
|
General data management |
24 |
73 |
51 |
6 |
26 |
Spatial data analysis |
24 |
17 |
3 |
2 |
134 |
General data analysis |
18 |
42 |
15 |
3 |
102 |
Data curation |
17 |
44 |
38 |
2 |
79 |
Qualitative data analysis |
13 |
18 |
4 |
1 |
144 |
Data sharing |
8 |
12 |
50 |
15 |
95 |
Data discovery |
7 |
23 |
57 |
10 |
83 |
Data policy |
6 |
5 |
31 |
7 |
131 |
Data security |
3 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
163 |
Data storage |
2 |
7 |
13 |
9 |
149 |
Data organization |
0 |
2 |
6 |
11 |
161 |