Evidence Summary
Graduate Assistants Trained in Reference May Not Consistently Apply
Reference Interview and Instructional Strategies in Reference Interactions
A Review of:
Canuel, R., Hervieux, S.,
Bergsten, V., Brault, A., & Burke, R. (2019). Developing and assessing a
graduate student reference service. Reference
Services Review, 47(4), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-06-2019-0041
Reviewed by:
Sarah Bartlett Schroeder
Research & Instruction Librarian
University of Washington Bothell/Cascadia College
Campus Library
Bothell, Washington, United States of America
Email: sarahkb6@uw.edu
Received: 5 Mar. 2020 Accepted: 11 Sept. 2020
2020 Schroeder. This is an Open Access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0
International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
DOI: 10.18438/eblip29750
Abstract
Objective – To evaluate the effectiveness of a reference training
program for graduate student employees that seeks to encourage use of reference
interview and instruction techniques in virtual and in-person reference
interactions.
Design – Naturalistic observation with qualitative content analysis.
Setting – A large, public research university in Montreal, Canada.
Subjects – Three graduate
students in Library and Information Science employed by the university library
to provide virtual and in-person reference services.
Methods – After completing a training program, the three participants provided
virtual and in-person reference training for two consecutive semesters. They
self-recorded their desk interactions in a Google form. These self-reports,
along with their online chat transcripts from QuestionPoint,
were the subject of this study’s analysis. Focusing on the QuestionPoint
data, the authors coded the transcripts from these participants’ online
reference interactions to reflect the presence or absence of a reference
interview and various instructional techniques in their responses to patrons.
Also, all in-person and virtual questions were examined and categorized as
being either transactional or reference questions. Reference questions were
further categorized as basic,
intermediate, or advanced
questions.
Main Results – Of the chat transcripts analyzed, 49% were classified as
containing reference questions rather than transactional questions. At the
desk, 21.9% of interactions were coded as reference questions. Taking the two
semesters together, 232 of 282 virtual reference questions were considered basic, while 41 were labelled intermediate, and 9 classified as advanced. Similarly, of 136 desk
reference questions, 120 were classified as basic, 14 as intermediate, and 2 as
advanced. In their coding of chat transcripts, researchers indicated whether
the interaction contained no reference interview, a partial reference
interview, or a complete reference interview. Virtual chat transcripts from
both fall and winter semesters showed that no reference interview took place in
77.3% of interactions. Authors noted evidence of partial reference interviews
in 19.3% of fall transcripts and 21.5% of winter transcripts. Complete
reference interviews took place in 3.4% of fall and 1.2% of winter transcripts.
Additionally, authors found that 65.5% of chat transcripts contained elements
of instruction, with Modelling and Resource Suggestion being the most
prevalent forms.
Conclusion – Because the graduate students used complete or partial
reference interviews in a small number of their virtual reference questions,
the authors of this study determined that more emphasis ought to be placed on
reference interviews, particularly virtual reference interactions, in future
training programs. Graduate students employed instructional strategies in
observed virtual reference interactions, a promising trend.
Commentary
Over the past several years, a number of studies have
considered how best to train students to provide online and in-person reference
services. A University of Michigan paper described an online and in-person
hybrid training process (Wetli, 2019). Librarians at
another Canadian university completed a content analysis of online chat
transcripts and patron surveys to determine the quality of student reference
interactions (Barrett & Greenberg, 2018). In one study, researchers
compared the quality of chat transcripts with student employees to those with
librarians (Lux & Rich, 2016). This study uses a similar content analysis
methodology.
This summary uses ReLIANT, a
tool designed to aid librarians in appraising evaluations of education and
training programs in four areas: Design, Educational Context, Results, and
Relevance (Koufogiannakis et al., 2006).
Regarding educational context, it is unclear what prior
relevant experience the three study participants brought to their roles, but it
is clear what setting they are working in and that they received a mix of
in-person instruction and observation hours with practicing librarians during
the training program. In terms of results, the data do accurately show that the
participants used reference interview and instructional tactics after training,
if only for online interactions. While the authors based their coding
techniques on previously published research and drew specifically from RUSA and
a 2008 study by Desai and Graves to inform their methodology, they did not
specify whether they completed coding separately or together and, if the
former, what level of overlap they achieved. This could influence the accuracy
of the research design. Adding such details together with comparison data, such
as an analysis of librarian chat responses or questions participants answered
before completing training, would have added richness to the analysis by
offering a comparative framework for determining the significance of the data.
Regarding relevance, the authors’ findings are
interpretive and might not apply to all settings. They see a need to include
greater emphasis on reference interview skills in future training, despite
offering several reasons why a reference interview might not be appropriate for
every question. They note briefly that some questions, such as known-item
searches, may reasonably be answered without using reference interview
techniques, but do not share how many interactions with advanced questions, for
example, included partial or complete reference interviews, as compared to
basic questions. Future studies could incorporate and elaborate upon these
topics.
As the authors note, libraries at colleges and
universities with LIS programs do commonly employ graduate students to provide
reference services. Thus, this study may offer librarians at such institutions
ideas for improving their own training programs. More broadly, the training
content pertaining to reference interviews and instructional techniques may be
useful for training librarians who are recent graduates or have minimal
reference experience, especially in online environments. The content analysis
methodology is valuable to other researchers examining trends in reference services.
References
Barrett, K. & Greenberg, A. (2018). Student-staffed
virtual reference services: How to meet the training challenge. Journal of Library & Information
Services in Distance Learning, 12(3–4),
101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2018.1498620
Desai, C. M., & Graves, S. J. (2008). Cyberspace or
face-to-face: The teachable moment and changing reference mediums. Reference & User Services Quarterly,
47(3), 242–255. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/morris_articles/18/
Koufogiannakis, D., Booth, A., & Brettle, A. (2006). ReLIANT: Reader’s guide to the Literature on Interventions
Addressing the Need of education and Training. Library and Information Research, 30(94), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg271
Lux, V. J., & Rich, L. (2016). Can student assistants
effectively provide chat reference services? Student transcripts vs. librarian
transcripts. Internet Reference Services
Quarterly, 21(3–4), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2016.1248585
Wetli, A. (2019).
Training temporary reference staff for maximized learning: A case study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(5), Article 102032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.04.009