Soohyung Joo
Associate Professor, School
of Information Science
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United
States of America
Email: soohyung.joo@uky.edu
Erin Ingram
Research Assistant, School
of Information Science
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United
States of America
Email: erin.ingram@uky.edu
Maria Cahill
Associate Professor, School
of Information Science
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United
States of America
Email: maria.cahill@uky.edu
Received: 15 Apr. 2021 Accepted: 14 Oct. 2021
2021 Joo, Ingram, and Cahill. This
is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0
International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
DOI: 10.18438/eblip29963
Objective
–
While storytime programs for preschool children are offered in nearly all public
libraries in the United States, little is known about the books librarians use
in these programs. This study employed text analysis to explore topics and
genres of books recommended for public library storytime programs.
Methods
–
In the study, the researchers randomly selected 429 children books recommended
for preschool storytime programs. Two corpuses of text were extracted from the
titles, abstracts, and subject terms from bibliographic data. Multiple text
mining methods were employed to investigate the content of the selected books,
including term frequency, bi-gram analysis, topic modeling, and sentiment
analysis.
Results
–
The findings revealed popular topics in storytime books, including
animals/creatures, color, alphabet, nature, movements, families, friends, and
others. The analysis of bibliographic data described various genres and formats
of storytime books, such as juvenile fiction, rhymes, board books, pictorial
work, poetry, folklore, and nonfiction. Sentiment analysis results reveal that
storytime books included a variety of words representing various dimensions of
sentiment.
Conclusion
–
The findings suggested that books recommended for storytime programs are
centered around topics of interest to children that also support school readiness.
In addition to selecting fictionalized stories that will support children in
developing the academic concepts and socio-emotional skills necessary for later
success, librarians should also be mindful of integrating informational texts
into storytime programs.
Storytime
programs for preschool children are a common provision of public libraries
worldwide. With a long history (Albright et al., 2009) and the highest rates of
attendance among public library program offerings (Miller et al., 2013),
storytimes serve as the backbone of public library programming. Preschool
storytimes are typically designed to be highly interactive, learning-focused,
thirty-minute enjoyable endeavors that incorporate shared book readings, props,
songs, and activities intended to engage both children and their adult
caregivers (Diamant-Cohen & Hetrick, 2014; Goulding et al., 2017; Mills et
al., 2018).
Book selection
is one task among many that storytime providers undertake when planning a
public library storytime program. Other planning tasks may include deciding on
a theme, incorporating educational tips for caregivers, gathering supplies for
an activity or craft, creating handouts for caregivers, integrating technology
resources, and choosing songs, interactive rhymes, fingerplays, movement
activities, or flannel board activities (Diamont-Cohen
& Hetrick, 2014; Ghoting & Martin-Diaz,
2006). To aid in planning these tasks, storytime providers may rely on
professional resources for storytime development such as conferences, books
published by the American Library Association and other library publishers,
trainings offered through state library agencies and consortia, and webinars or
courses from commercial websites such as Webjunction
or Library Juice Academy. However, these formal resources may not be accessible
to all storytime providers due to financial costs or time constraints.
Therefore, storytime providers at a public library with a limited budget may
prefer to plan with the aid of a free informal, online resource, such as a
librarian’s blog about storytime programs or a library’s website with
recommended reading lists.
In this study,
we explored the subject matter of books recommended by online resources for
public library preschool storytime programs. We extracted bibliographic records
of books recommended for storytimes and analyzed them to explore topics,
genres, and sentiment of those books. We applied text mining methods for data
analysis, such as term frequency and network analysis, LDA topic modeling, and
sentiment analysis.
Picture books
serve as unique multimodal sources of information in which verbal and visual
elements combine and interact to convey meaning (Martens et al., 2012). The
tension between visual and verbal modes—the tendency to slowly gaze upon images
and layout versus the forward momentum of reading text—make the picture book
reading experience distinct and synergistic (Sipe, 1998). Serafini (2012) has
posited four roles essential for picture book reading: 1) the navigator role
entails proficiently employing conventions of print and cognitive strategies
and skills to move through the written text while simultaneously making sense
of the visual design and images; 2) the interpreter role consists of meaning
making; 3) in acting as a designer, the reader determines the path through
which a text is experienced by determining the order of attention to and
importance of textual and visual elements; and 4) in enacting the interrogator
role, the reader serves as a critical analyst acknowledging that messages and
interpretations are socially constructed and politically, socially, and
culturally powerful. Using Eisenberg and Small’s (1993) framework for
information-based education, Campana (2018) demonstrated that information
resources, information process, and individuals interact within the storytime
context to provide learning opportunities for all involved. As a primary
information resource within storytime programs, picture books are an important
element of the storytime learning environment, and the storytime librarians’
processes facilitate children’s picture book reading and meaning making.
Nearly half of
all picture books published in English in the United States feature animals as
leading characters (Horning, 2016). Preschool-aged children have shown an
aesthetic preference for artwork, such as picture book covers, that feature
animals (Danko-McGhee & Slutsky, 2011). Markowsky (1975) pointed to four reasons why children’s
book authors and illustrators might choose animal characters: a) void of the
accoutrements associated with specific groups of people, animal characters are
relatable to children of all stripes and circumstances; b) animal characters
produce an element of whimsy, enabling escape, inspiration, and imagination; c)
animal characters serve as a form of shorthand or symbolic representation; and
d) animal characters with exaggerated features and characteristics lend an
element of humor.
Several studies
have examined characteristics of books read aloud in preschool classrooms and
centers. Mesmer (2018) interviewed the staff of 31 preschool centers in the
southwestern United States who expressed that the characteristics they
considered most frequently were illustrations, rhyme, length, simple content,
and a topic relevant to children. When examining the genres of such books,
researchers have noted a lack of informational books (Pentimonti
et al., 2011; Thoren, 2016). This is concerning
because sharing informational books provides many educational benefits to
children, such as content knowledge and preparation for successfully reading
this genre in school (Lennox, 2013; Neuman et al., 2016), and because children
are highly interested in informational books (Baldwin & Morrow, 2019; Price
et al., 2012). In addition, studies of preschool classrooms revealed a lack of
concept books, or books that focused on foundational academic topics such as
counting and the alphabet (Gou et al., 2013; Pentimonti
et al., 2011).
Diamant-Cohen
and Hetrick (2014) contended that “the main goal of preschool storytime is to
help children develop a positive connection with books and illustrations, which
will later translate into a positive attitude toward books in general” (p. 4).
To accomplish this goal, librarians typically incorporate three to four books
in each storytime program (Diamant-Cohen & Hetrick, 2014; Goulding et al.,
2017; Kociubuk & Campana, 2019). Naturally, the
topics and sentiment of books shared in public library storytime programs will
affect the extent to which children develop a positive connection; thus,
librarians’ book choices are important.
Despite the
importance of book choice, only a few studies have examined the characteristics
of books chosen for storytime programs. One study examined the books shared in
69 baby, toddler, preschool, and family storytimes in public libraries in the
state of Washington during 2013 (Kociubuk &
Campana, 2019). The book characteristics collected were genre (fiction or
nonfiction) and publication date; thus, this study does not provide insight
into the topic or sentiment of storytime books. In contrast, two surveys of
professionals who choose storytime books revealed that they did take into account the topic and other aspects of a book’s
content (Carroll, 2015; Fullerton et al., 2018). Carroll (2015) identified
seven influential factors in book selection: length and complexity;
illustrations; subjects, concepts, and themes; use of language such as rhyme
and repetition; how easily the book could be used to invite audience
participation; elements such as suspense or humor that could emotionally engage
the children; and personal preference. Similarly, respondents to Fullerton et
al.’s (2018) survey chose language use and illustrator’s craft as top
considerations when selecting books.
One of the
important program objectives of storytimes lies in learning and education
(Campana, 2018; Fehrenbach et al., 1998; Peterson,
2012). Storytime providers have long emphasized early literacy development of
young children when designing programs (Albright et al, 2009), but scholars
have recently noted the broader role libraries play in supporting school
readiness (Campana, 2018). Storytime serves as a valuable opportunity for
children to build knowledge structures of colors, numbers, singing, alphabet,
and more (Cahill et al., 2018). According to Celano
and Neuman (2001), “by reading books, telling stories, and reciting rhymes,
librarians offer children a ‘leg up’ in developing emergent reading skills” (p.
39).
While parents
and caregivers certainly value storytimes for the learning opportunities they
afford, many view these programs as family entertainment venues (Khoir et al., 2017) and worthy experiences simply because of
the joy they bring to children (Cahill et al., 2020). Most storytime programs
offer opportunities for children and adults to interact, play, and sing (Celano & Neuman, 2001). Stories told in rhymes and
picture book versions of songs, in addition to encouraging playful interaction,
may aid children in developing early literacy skills such as phonological
awareness (Giles & Fresne, 2015).
Additionally,
storytimes serve as opportunities to stimulate and extend children’s feelings
and emotional experiences because reading children’s literature can be a source
of emotional learning for children (Short, 2018; Thoren,
2016) and shared book reading has been found to be a viable activity to help
children build socio-emotional competence (Schapira
& Aram, 2019). Further, a majority of literacy educators, including
librarians, regard social emotional learning as a responsibility of literacy
educators but one for which they need further support (International Literacy
Association, 2020).
Storytime programs for young children are offered in
nearly all public libraries. However, few researchers have investigated the
topics and content of the books that librarians use in such programs. It is
important to have a better understanding of the content of the books to produce
best practices and suggestions for book selection in storytimes for young
children. Our overarching aim through this study was to explore topics and
genres of the books that are read in storytimes for young children in public
libraries. In addition, we aimed to examine the nature of sentiment represented
in books widely used in storytimes for young children. The methodological
contribution of this study is that it employed computational text analysis
methods to investigate the content of a large sample size of books recommended
for library storytime programs. The following two research questions guide the
investigation of this study:
RQ 1. What are the topics and genres of books
recommended for public library storytime programs designed for preschool
children?
RQ 2. What is the nature of sentiment represented in
books recommended for public library storytime programs designed for preschool
children?
Table 1
Online Resources for Storytime Chosen for This Study
Resource |
Number
of Total Themes |
Number
of Themes in Stratified Random Sample |
Esther
Storytimes |
74 |
15 |
Jbrary |
19 |
4 |
MCLS
kids |
158 |
32 |
Silly
Librarian Preschool |
100 |
20 |
Storytime
Katie |
195 |
39 |
Storytime
Secrets |
70 |
14 |
Total |
616 |
124 |
To identify informal sources that storytime providers
were likely to encounter and use, we conducted a simple Internet search for
“storytime resources for librarians.” We then selected the first six sources
that recommended books for storytime use based on theme: Esther Storytimes, Jbrary, MCLS Kids, Silly Librarian,
Storytime Katie, and Storytime Secrets. We next created a
list of all preschool storytime themes shared on each site, which totaled 616
in all (Table 1). Because each theme contained multiple book recommendations,
including the entire population would be laborious and unfeasible from a data
preparation standpoint; thus, we randomly selected 20% of the themes, resulting
in 124 themes in the sample. For each theme, we recorded the name and author of
each book recommended as supporting the theme and appropriate for storytime.
In this study, we analyzed largely two types of
textual information collected about each book from the WorldCat database:
“titles and abstracts” and “subject terms.” We excluded any books that did not
have an abstract available from WorldCat. After removing them from the book
list, 429 books were used for analysis. Two sets of text corpus data were made
for text mining: (1) titles and abstracts and (2) subject terms.
Multiple text mining techniques were employed to
explore the content of storytime books. First, a term frequency analysis was
conducted to identify the most frequent terms that occurred in each corpus. The
collected text underwent a pre-processing process, including tokenization, stopword elimination, and stemming. In addition, bi-grams
were further investigated to identify key concepts or popular genres in
storytime books. Second, we analyzed the relationships among the terms based on
term co-occurrence analysis. A term co-occurrence map was created to identify
key topics and genres in storytime books. Third, Latent Dirichlet Allocation
(LDA) topic modeling was applied to uncover prevailing topics underlying the
books commonly recommended for storytimes. LDA topic modeling is an
unsupervised machine learning method to discover hidden themes or topics from
unstructured text (Blei, 2012). We extracted 20
topics from the corpus of titles and abstracts. Fourth, we explored the nature
of emotion reflected in storytime books by analyzing sentiment terms. The
sentiment lexicon constructed by Liu (2015) was adopted to investigate
emotional aspects of the text from storytime books. The bing
lexicon classifies selected words into the binary categories, i.e., positive
and negative sentiment categories (https://www.cs.uic.edu/~liub/FBS/sentiment-analysis.html).
Textual analysis was conducted using various R
software packages. R is a software tool that can be used for statistical
analysis and data science, and it includes a multitude of packages for natural
language processing and text mining. For term frequency analysis, two packages
were mainly used: R tm and R tidy. For the LDA topic model, the R topic models
package was employed.
First, we
calculated the most frequent terms from the corpus of titles and abstracts. It
exhibited 2,289 unique terms and 7,718 tokens after removing stopwords. In textual analysis, a unique word (also called
type) refers to a distinct term in a corpus while a token indicates an
occurrence of a unique type (Jackson & Moulinier,
2007). We investigated the top 96 stemmed terms that appeared more than 15
times (Appendix A). The two most frequent terms are “book” (1st, 1.35%) and “anim” (2nd, 1.17%). Abstracts usually summarize the books,
so it is not a surprise that the term “book” occurred most frequently from the
corpus. Interestingly, “anim,” which indicated the
term of “animal(s),” was observed second most frequently. In addition, there
were other animal-related terms observed among top ranked terms; for instance,
“bear” (3rd), “cat” (15th), and “dog” (21st), among several others. The results
also included several terms associated with early learning, such as “color”
(8th), “rhyme” (12th), “alphabet” (26th), “read” (43rd), and “count” (82nd).
Another distinct group of frequent terms can be classified as book audiences or
characters, such as “young” (7th), “babi” (9th),
“children” (10th), “boy” (12th), and “reader” (23rd). In addition, several
terms were related to actions or movements, such as “play” (3rd), “find” (3rd),
and “danc” (37th). We also observed terms depicting
emotion, such as “love” (3rd), “fun” (43rd), and “enjoy” (82nd).
We next turned
attention to the “subject terms” corpus and tallied frequencies of the terms
observed in it. The corpus consisted of 538 unique terms and 3,642 tokens.
Subject terms were much shorter than the combinations of titles and summaries.
Also, this corpus mostly consisted of nouns with only few adjectives or verbs
observed. The top 82 most frequent terms that appeared more than five times are
listed in Appendix B. The analysis showed that subject terms are likely to
provide genre information or more condensed topic terms. The two top-ranked
terms indicated genres of books: “fiction” (1st, 25.95%) and “juvenil” (2nd, 13.40%). WorldCat organizes books by genre
using subject headings. For example, A
Fairy-Tale Fall by Apple Jordan has three subject terms: “Autumn --
Juvenile fiction,” “Princesses -- Juvenile fiction,” and “Halloween -- Juvenile
fiction,” and represents a typical format of WorldCat subject terms, which is a
combination of a topical term and a genre. Thus, genre related terms were a
frequent observation from the corpus. Other genre classification terms that
ranked highly included “stori” (3rd), “rhyme” (6th),
“literatur” (7th), “pictori”
(10th), “picture” (15th), “movabl” (17th), and
several others. This finding implied that most storytime books could be
categorized as juvenile fiction, stories in rhyme, pictorial works, picture
books, or movable books. We can also infer that storytime books involved other
genres, such as “folklore” (24th), “poetri” (26th),
and “nonfict” (55th).
In addition,
subject terms depicted prevalent topics in storytime books. Interestingly,
similar to the results from the titles and abstracts, the term “anim” is ranked highly at 5th, revealing the popularity of
animal related topics in storytimes. Animal related terms included “dog”
(19th), “bear” (20th), “cat” (24th), “rabbit” (46th), and several others.
Several of the terms implied topics related to knowledge and skills important
for young children; for example “count” (20th), “song”
(28th), “alphabet” (34th), “sound” (46th), “scienc”
(46th), “read” (68th), and “languag” (83rd).
Storytime books also reflected social and behavioural
topics, such as “friendship” (46th), “behavior” (61st), and “social” (68th).
Other notable topics or concepts that children can learn included: family
(e.g., “famili” (32nd), “mother” (34th), “parent”
(46th), “son” (61st), and “father” (55st)), nature (e.g., “natur”
(32nd), “snow” (46th), “moon” (61st), and “tree” (83rd)), settings (e.g.,
“farm” (39th), “garden” (46th), and “zoo” (83rd)), Halloween (e.g., “Halloween”
(34th) and “pumpkin” (68th)), and other objects/characters (e.g., “monster”
(55rd), “pirat” (61st), and “dinosaur” (68th)).
We further
analyzed bi-gram terms, which indicated two adjacent tokens, from the titles
and abstracts corpus. In total, 9,018 unique bi-grams were observed after
removing stopwords. Appendix C lists the top 44
bi-gram terms that were counted four times or more. The top two bi-grams are
“picture book” and “rhyming text.” Also, among the ranked bi-grams, there were
bi-grams that indicated the types of books, including “board book,” “simple
text,” and “illustrations rhyming.” This finding highlighted that the nature of
storytime books related to pictures, rhymes, and simple text to be shared with
young children. The bi-gram analysis result also showed popular topics and
characters in storytime books. As shown in Figure 1, a term co-occurrence
network revealed relationships among key terms in storytime books. The term
“book” showed close associations with “picture,” “children,” and “animal,”
which reveals popular types of books in storytimes. Another notable linking
group is made of “text,” “illustrations,” and “rhyming.”
The same bi-gram
analysis was conducted for the subject terms (Appendix D). In total, 3,250
bi-grams (1,312 unique bi-gram types) were observed. The most frequent bi-grams
indicated the genres or types of storytime books; for example
“juvenile fiction,” “juvenile literature,” “fiction stories,” “board books,”
“pictorial works,” and so on. The visualization of term co-occurrence analysis
highlighted the genres of storytime books as it placed “juvenile” and “fiction”
among other genre terms in the center of the network diagram (Figure 2).
To explore
popular topics in storytime books, we derived 20 topics from the titles and
abstracts corpus using the LDA topic model (Table 2). Not all topics exhibit
distinct and coherent thematic terms, but we found that these topics can be
classified largely into several categories. There are several learning components
observed from the extracted topics: for example, T7 (e.g., alphabet, letter)
and T4 (e.g., color, crayon, count). Animals and creatures were another
prominent topic in storytimes, such as T6 (e.g., cat,
dog), T2 (e.g., mouse, spider, pigeon), and T11 (e.g., bear, elephant). The LDA
topic model also detected topic terms relevant to book types, such as T9 (e.g.,
book, illustration), T14 (e.g., rhyme, illustration, and interactive) and T20
(e.g., illustration, rhyme). The components of activities, actions, and
movements were also reflected in storytime books: for
example, T5 (e.g., dance, swim, discover) and T4 (e.g., play). Moreover, topic
terms obtained from the LDA algorithm represented other aspects of topics
covered in storytime books, ranging from audiences
(e.g., children, young reader), friends and families (e.g., friend, family,
mother), nature (e.g., tree, sky, flower), settings (e.g., farm, garden), and
emotions (e.g., fun, love, happy).
Figure 1
A network of
term co-occurrence relationships: titles and abstracts.
Figure 2
A network of
term co-occurrence relationships: subject terms.
Table 2
LDA Topic Model
(20 Topics)
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
T7 |
T8 |
T9 |
T10 |
night fun stop home busi visit pig differ follow pictur |
mous spider includ pigeon back web mommi cooki long varieti |
hat magic text rabbit classic pop best name treasur chicken |
play color crayon children creat heart zoo bestsel count time |
danc pumpkin halloween swim discov five favorit board pirat grade |
cat love dog shoe imagin pete around white kitti sing |
alphabet letter featur differ time pictur world full pea everi |
grow follow mani plant turn tree eat forest celebr librari |
book illustr life old artist time cut journey color easi |
egg girl back salli bug butterfli ice big chick bring |
T11 |
T12 |
T13 |
T14 |
T15 |
T16 |
T17 |
T18 |
T19 |
T20 |
bear big boy brown bus eleph tree celebr around cake |
find boy tri song pictur school describ best everyth join |
farm bunni mother text dinosaur tale bed amaz world readi |
young reader rhyme garden illustr moon children interact reveal edit |
stori give introduc train blanket surpris children includ sit answer |
perfect famili crocodil keep three full live water know show |
anim tail page cloth enjoy everyon wear parent louis aloud |
book babi love penguin toe red along delight flap page |
friend read simpl snow tri sheep monster kiss text hous |
appl ten illustr tree rhyme leav gingerbread pie simpl trick |
Sentiment analysis was conducted to explore the
emotional aspects of storytime language. We identified the top 25 positive and
negative terms respectively (Figure 3). Overall, there were more positive terms
than negative terms observed from the titles and abstracts corpus. Frequently
observed positive terms include “like,” “love,” “perfect,” “fun,” “classic,”
“favorite,” and others. These positive terms described storytime books as
likable, easy, fun, enjoyable, playful, happy, and other upbeat descriptions.
On the contrary, there were fewer negative terms observed. The top ranked
negative term turned out to be “fall.” According to our further observation,
however, there were more cases when the term “fall” was used to indicate the
season, rather than an act of falling or moving down: for example, “a little
girl spends a glorious fall day picking apples and searching for the perfect
pumpkin in this edition of a timeless favorite” in the book Apples and Pumpkins
by Anne Rockwell. Other negative terms did not necessarily have any negative
nuance in the context of children's stories. For instance, pigs and bugs are
likely to be featured as friendly characters rather than unpleasant objects in
storytime books. Despite the nuance based on context, other terms appeared with
obvious negative connotations, such as “die,” “tired,” “trouble,” “lonely,”
“skeptical,” “fear,” and others.
Figure 3
Positive and
negative terms in storytime books.
By analyzing the most frequent terms, we explored
different aspects of storytime books, such as popular topics, audiences, and
styles or techniques for sharing the books. Not surprisingly, animals were a
major topic in these recommended books just as they are in picture books in
general (Horning, 2016). In our results, various types of animals were ranked
highly, such as bear, cat, dog, mouse, and rabbit. Because preschool-age
children have shown a preference for artwork that features animals (Danko-McGhee & Slutsky, 2011), our results indicated
that sharing these recommended books would appeal to children’s interests.
The frequent terms also pointed to opportunities to
integrate school readiness and other elements of early learning into storytime
programs. Several different concepts related to children’s learning were
observed, such as color, rhymes, alphabet, read, song, and count. The use of
concept books may be especially important in public library storytimes to give
children additional support in these content areas because studies have found
that preschool classrooms and centers may offer only small numbers of concept
books (Guo et al., 2013; Pentimonti et al., 2011).
Additionally, the findings coincided with the storytime providers’ preference
for concept books that may engage and empower children with familiar,
repetitive content (Carroll, 2015). The frequency of terms related to early
learning concepts indicated that providers can use these recommended books to
achieve the school readiness related objectives of storytimes.
The term frequency analysis also pointed to
opportunities for librarians to structure storytimes as emotionally positive
and fun. Frequent terms included “play,” “love,” “fun,” “enjoy,” and “dance.”
Based on attendees’ expectations that storytimes are a place for entertainment
(Khoir et al., 2017) and joyful experiences (Cahill
et al., 2020), sharing these recommended books can be part of meeting
attendees’ expectations and accomplishing storytime objectives.
The analysis of subject terms illuminated popular
genres of storytime books as they tended to include controlled heading terms of
book genres/categories. The top 10 terms identified the most common genres of
books shared in storytimes: fiction, juvenile, story books, rhymes, children's
literature, board books, and pictorial works. We found that storytime books
also included poetry, folklore, and nonfiction, although to a much smaller
extent. These findings were similar to those of Kociubuk
and Campana (2019), who found that less than 10% of stories shared in
storytimes were in the narrative informational or non-narrative informational
genres.
The term-level analysis revealed both visual and sound
modes of story delivery in storytimes. Terms related to visual mode, such as
pictures and illustrations, were highly ranked in both the corpuses. Also,
storytime books actively involved sound modes, in particular, rhymes and songs.
That is, storytime books are not simply text of stories, they promote
interactivity through multiple modes by utilizing both visual and sound sensory
channels to deliver stories to children. The importance of visual elements as a
rationale for choosing books for read-alouds is
reflected in research with children, storytime providers, children’s literature
experts, and early childhood education teachers (Carroll, 2015; Danko-McGhee & Slutsky, 2011; Fullerton et al., 2018;
Mesmer, 2018).
Movements and actions are another mode to facilitate
interactions and are often integrated into storytimes; however, not many
action/movement terms were observed among the top terms. This may be because
storytime providers plan to get the audience moving before or after reading
books aloud through activities such as songs, rhymes, or fingerplays (Giles
& Fresne, 2015; Kociubuk
& Campana, 2019).
We also explored emotional aspects of storytime books
based on sentiment analysis. Overall, the sentiment nature of the storytime
context is very positive, showing more positive vocabulary proportionately in
this study. That is, the fundamental atmosphere of storytimes would be very
positive and enjoyable. In addition, we observed that storytime books included
various words representing emotion. They can be sources for children to learn
and understand a diverse spectrum of emotion and sentiment, thus giving
providers the opportunity to contribute to children’s social-emotional
learning, another objective of storytime programs.
This study was not without limitations. First, the
analysis was done with the bibliographic records from the WorldCat database.
The dataset consisted of titles, abstracts, and subject terms of the selected
books, but it did not include full-text. Second, the sample of 429 books might
not represent the entire book selection in storytime practices. The books
included are recommended widely across the storytime community, but there is no
information on which books are actually adopted and read in the field. Third,
several of the terms were not interpreted correctly in the sentiment analysis
as the computational tool did not catch the meaning or nuance currently in the
context. For example, the word “fall” was categorized into the negative terms
even though it indicated the season. These limitations indicated a need for
further research, which can investigate full-text content of an enlarged sample
of storytime books. Future research can also develop a sophisticated method to
better analyze topical terms and sentiment based on text mining. Additionally,
the complexity of language can be investigated to assess the levels of
vocabulary exposed to children via storytimes.
In this study, we employed a text mining approach to
explore topics of storytime books. We identified 429 books recommended for use
in public library storytime sessions designed for preschool age children, and
we collected two corpuses of text from the WorldCat database based on these
books: a) titles and abstracts, and b) subject terms. To investigate the nature
of theme and sentiment in storytime books, we applied multiple text mining
techniques for the collected text, such as term frequency analysis, bi-grams
analysis, term co-occurrences network analysis, LDA topic modeling, and
sentiment analysis. The findings revealed popular topics and genres as well as
emotional terms that would likely be addressed in storytimes drawing from these
sources.
So what? Why does it matter what books librarians may
choose to share with children and caregivers during storytime? According to
Sipe (2008), “literature … allows us to perceive our lives, the lives of
others, and our society in new ways, expanding our view of what is possible,
serving as a catalyst to ignite our capacity to imagine a more just and
equitable world. To understand stories and how they work is thus to possess a
cognitive tool that not only allows children to become comprehensively
literate, but also to achieve their full human potential” (p. 247). Our
findings suggested that the books recommended for storytime programs hold the
promise of preparing children for school and for life.
Soohyung Joo:
Conceptualization, Data collection, Data analysis, Investigation, Writing –
original draft, Writing – revision and editing Erin Ingram: Conceptualization, Data collection, Literature review,
Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – revision and editing Maria Cahill: Conceptualization, Data
collection, Literature review, Investigation, Discussion, Writing – original
draft, Writing – revision and editing.
This work was supported by the Institute of Museum and
Library Services (Federal Award Identification Number: LG-96-17-0199-17). We
are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Albright, M., Delecki, K.,
& Hinkle S. (2009). The evolution of early literacy. Children & Libraries, 7(1), 13–18.
Baldwin, C. G., & Morrow, L. M. (2019).
Interactive shared book reading with a narrative and an informational book: The
effect of genre on parent-child reading. Preschool
& Primary Education, 7(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.20909
Blei, D. M. (2012).
Probabilistic topic models. Communications
of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
Cahill, M., Joo, S., &
Campana, K. (2018). Analysis of language use in public library storytimes. Journal of Librarianship & Information
Science, 52(2), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618818886
Cahill, M., Joo, S., Howard,
M., & Walker, S. (2020). We’ve been offering it for years, but why do they
come? The reasons why adults bring young children to public library storytimes.
Libri, 70(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2020-0047
Campana, K. (2018). The multimodal power of storytime: Exploring an information environment
for young children (Publication No. 10825573) [Doctoral dissertation,
University of Washington]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Carroll, V. (2015). Preschool storytime in Auckland’s public libraries: A qualitative study
of book selection practices [Master’s thesis, Victoria University of
Wellington]. Victoria University of Wellington Research Archive. https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/handle/10063/4690
Celano, D., &
Neuman, S. B. (2001). The role of public
libraries in children’s literacy development: An evaluation report. Pennsylvania
Library Association.
Danko-McGhee, K.,
& Slutsky, R. (2011). Judging a book by its cover: Preschool children’s
aesthetic preferences for picture books. International
Journal of Education through Art, 7(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.7.2.171_1
Diamant-Cohen, B., & Hetrick, M. A. (2014). Transforming preschool storytime: A modern vision and a year of
programs. American Library Association Neal-Schuman.
Eisenberg, M. B., & Small, R. V. (1993).
Information-based education: An investigation of the nature and role of
information attributes in education. Information
Processing and Management, 29(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90010-B
Fehrenbach, L. A., Hurford, D. P., Fehrenbach, C.
R., & Brannock, R. G. (1998). Developing the
emergent literacy of preschool children through a library outreach program. Journal of Youth Services, 12(1), 40-45.
Fullerton, S. K., Schafer, G. J., Hubbard, K.,
McClure, E. L., Salley, L., & Ross, R. (2018). Considering quality and
diversity: An analysis of read-aloud recommendations and rationales from
children’s literature experts. New Review
of Children's Literature and Librarianship, 24(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2018.1433473
Giles, R. M., & Fresne, J. (2015). Musical
stories infusing your read-alouds with music,
movement, and sound. Public Libraries,
54(5), 31–34. http://publiclibrariesonline.org/2015/11/musical-stories-infusing-your-read-alouds-with-music-movement-and-sound/
Ghoting, S., & Martin-Diaz,
P. (2006). Early literacy storytimes @
your library: Partnering with caregivers for success. American Library Association.
Goulding, A., Dickie, J., & Shuker, M. J. (2017).
Observing preschool storytime practices in Aotearoa New Zealand's urban public
libraries. Library & Information
Science Research, 39(3), 199–212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.005
Guo, Y., Sawyer, B. E., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2013). Quality of the literacy
environment in inclusive early childhood special education classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113500343
Horning, K. T. (2016, July 28). Drilling down on
diversity in picture books. CCBlogC. https://ccblogc.blogspot.com/2016/07/drilling-down-on-diversity-in-picture.html
International Literacy Association. (2020). What’s hot in literacy report. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/resource-documents/whatshotreport_2020_final.pdf
Jackson, P., & Moulinier,
I. (2007). Natural language processing
for online applications: Text retrieval, extraction and categorization.
John Benjamins.
Khoir, S., Du, J. T.,
Davison, R. M., & Koronios, A. (2017).
Contributing to social capital: An investigation of Asian immigrants’ use of
public library services. Library &
Information Science Research, 39(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.005
Kociubuk, K. J., &
Campana, K. (2019). Sharing stories: An exploration of genres in storytimes. Journal of Librarianship and Information
Science, 52(3), 905–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619882751
Lennox, S. (2013). Interactive read-alouds – An avenue for enhancing children's language for
thinking and understanding: A review of recent research. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0578-5
Liu, B. (2015). Sentiment
analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions. Cambridge University
Press.
Markowsky, J. K. (1975).
Why anthropomorphism in children’s literature? Elementary English, 52(4), 460-462, 466.
Martens, P., Martens, R., Doyle, M. H., Loomis, J.,
& Aghalarov, S. (2012). Learning from picturebooks: Reading and writing multimodally in first
grade. The Reading Teacher, 66(4),
285-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01099
Mesmer, H. A. (2018). Books, read-alouds,
and voluntary book interactions: What do we know about centers serving
three-year-olds? Literacy
Research and Instruction, 57(2),
158–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1347220
Miller, C., Zickuhr, K., Rainie, H., & Purcell,
K. (2013). Parents, children, libraries,
and reading. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/05/01/parents-children-libraries-and-reading-3/
Mills, J. E., Campana, K., Carlyle, A., Kotrla, B., Dresang, E. T.,
Urban, I. B., Capps, J. L., Metoyer, C., Feldman, E. N., Brouwer, M, &
Burnett, K. (2018). Early literacy in library storytimes, part 2: A
quasi-experimental study and intervention with children’s storytime providers. Library Quarterly: Information, Community,
Policy, 88(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1086/696581
Neuman, S. B., Kaefer, T., &, Pinkham, A. M.
(2016). Improving low-income preschoolers’ word and word knowledge: The effects
of content-rich instruction. The
Elementary School Journal, 116(4),
652–674. https://doi.org/10.1086/686463
Pentimoti, J. M., Zucker,
T. A., & Justice, L. M. (2011). What are preschool teachers reading in
their classrooms? Reading Psychology, 32(3),
197–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711003604484
Peterson, S. S. (2012). Preschool early literacy
programs in Ontario public libraries. Partnership:
The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 7(2),
1–21. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v7i2.1961
Price, L. H., Bradley, B. A., & Smith, J. M.
(2012). A comparison of preschool teachers’ talk
during storybook and information book read-alouds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.02.003
Schapira, R., &
Aram, D. (2019). Shared book reading at home and preschoolers’ socio-emotional
competence. Early Education and
Development, 31(6), 819–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1692624
Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources
model: Reading visual and multi-modal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.656347
Short, K. G. (2018). What’s trending in children’s
literature and why it matters. Language
Arts, 95(5), 287–298. https://old.coe.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/pages/files/whats-trending-childrens-literature.pdf
Sipe, L. R. (1998). How picture books work: A
semiotically framed theory of text-picture relationships. Children's Literature in Education, 29(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022459009182
Sipe, L. (2008). Storytime:
Young children’s literary understanding in the classroom. Teachers College
Press.
Thoren, J. E. (2016). Exploring preschool teachers’ perceptions regarding
the barriers to selecting literature genres and utilizing extension activities:
A qualitative multiple case study (Publication No. 10240705) [Doctoral
dissertation, Northcentral University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
Global.
Rank |
Term |
Freq. |
Percent |
Rank |
Term |
Freq. |
Percent |
1 |
book |
104 |
1.35% |
43 |
full |
19 |
0.25% |
2 |
anim |
90 |
1.17% |
50 |
back |
18 |
0.23% |
3 |
love |
48 |
0.62% |
50 |
bed |
18 |
0.23% |
3 |
bear |
48 |
0.62% |
50 |
everyon |
18 |
0.23% |
3 |
find |
48 |
0.62% |
50 |
magic |
18 |
0.23% |
3 |
play |
48 |
0.62% |
50 |
garden |
18 |
0.23% |
7 |
young |
45 |
0.58% |
50 |
old |
18 |
0.23% |
8 |
color |
42 |
0.54% |
56 |
follow |
17 |
0.22% |
9 |
babi |
39 |
0.51% |
56 |
celebr |
17 |
0.22% |
10 |
children |
38 |
0.49% |
56 |
toe |
17 |
0.22% |
11 |
illustr |
37 |
0.48% |
56 |
just |
17 |
0.22% |
12 |
boy |
36 |
0.47% |
56 |
farm |
17 |
0.22% |
12 |
rhyme |
36 |
0.47% |
56 |
egg |
17 |
0.22% |
14 |
text |
35 |
0.45% |
56 |
board |
17 |
0.22% |
15 |
tri |
33 |
0.43% |
56 |
monster |
17 |
0.22% |
15 |
cat |
33 |
0.43% |
56 |
home |
17 |
0.22% |
17 |
stori |
32 |
0.41% |
65 |
surpris |
16 |
0.21% |
18 |
tree |
31 |
0.40% |
65 |
girl |
16 |
0.21% |
19 |
friend |
30 |
0.39% |
65 |
busi |
16 |
0.21% |
19 |
pictur |
30 |
0.39% |
65 |
learn |
16 |
0.21% |
21 |
dog |
29 |
0.38% |
65 |
shoe |
16 |
0.21% |
21 |
time |
29 |
0.38% |
65 |
featur |
16 |
0.21% |
23 |
reader |
28 |
0.36% |
71 |
child |
15 |
0.19% |
23 |
mani |
28 |
0.36% |
71 |
crayon |
15 |
0.19% |
23 |
big |
28 |
0.36% |
71 |
goe |
15 |
0.19% |
26 |
alphabet |
25 |
0.32% |
71 |
keep |
15 |
0.19% |
26 |
page |
25 |
0.32% |
71 |
kiss |
15 |
0.19% |
28 |
simpl |
24 |
0.31% |
71 |
beauti |
15 |
0.19% |
28 |
night |
24 |
0.31% |
71 |
pumpkin |
15 |
0.19% |
28 |
world |
24 |
0.31% |
71 |
stop |
15 |
0.19% |
28 |
hat |
24 |
0.31% |
71 |
give |
15 |
0.19% |
32 |
grow |
23 |
0.30% |
71 |
school |
15 |
0.19% |
32 |
mother |
23 |
0.30% |
71 |
snow |
15 |
0.19% |
32 |
includ |
23 |
0.30% |
82 |
crocodil |
14 |
0.18% |
35 |
ten |
22 |
0.29% |
82 |
count |
14 |
0.18% |
35 |
appl |
22 |
0.29% |
82 |
best |
14 |
0.18% |
37 |
perfect |
21 |
0.27% |
82 |
around |
14 |
0.18% |
37 |
danc |
21 |
0.27% |
82 |
creat |
14 |
0.18% |
37 |
red |
21 |
0.27% |
82 |
enjoy |
14 |
0.18% |
40 |
penguin |
20 |
0.26% |
82 |
share |
14 |
0.18% |
40 |
know |
20 |
0.26% |
82 |
everyth |
14 |
0.18% |
40 |
famili |
20 |
0.26% |
82 |
introduc |
14 |
0.18% |
43 |
fun |
19 |
0.25% |
82 |
spider |
14 |
0.18% |
43 |
water |
19 |
0.25% |
82 |
imagin |
14 |
0.18% |
43 |
read |
19 |
0.25% |
82 |
heart |
14 |
0.18% |
43 |
discov |
19 |
0.25% |
82 |
bath |
14 |
0.18% |
43 |
differ |
19 |
0.25% |
82 |
song |
14 |
0.18% |
43 |
mous |
19 |
0.25% |
82 |
duck |
14 |
0.18% |
Most Frequent Terms from the Subject Terms
Rank |
Term |
Freq. |
Percent |
Rank |
Term |
Freq. |
Percent |
1 |
fiction |
945 |
25.95% |
39 |
appl |
10 |
0.27% |
2 |
juvenil |
488 |
13.40% |
39 |
domest |
10 |
0.27% |
3 |
stori |
126 |
3.46% |
39 |
farm |
10 |
0.27% |
4 |
book |
110 |
3.02% |
39 |
play |
10 |
0.27% |
5 |
anim |
99 |
2.72% |
46 |
scienc |
9 |
0.25% |
6 |
rhyme |
81 |
2.22% |
46 |
rabbit |
9 |
0.25% |
7 |
literatur |
60 |
1.65% |
46 |
american |
9 |
0.25% |
8 |
children |
55 |
1.51% |
46 |
parent |
9 |
0.25% |
9 |
board |
50 |
1.37% |
46 |
garden |
9 |
0.25% |
10 |
pictori |
42 |
1.15% |
46 |
sound |
9 |
0.25% |
11 |
work |
41 |
1.13% |
46 |
friendship |
9 |
0.25% |
12 |
humor |
27 |
0.74% |
46 |
text |
9 |
0.25% |
13 |
toy |
23 |
0.63% |
46 |
snow |
9 |
0.25% |
13 |
specimen |
23 |
0.63% |
55 |
penguin |
8 |
0.22% |
15 |
pictur |
22 |
0.60% |
55 |
fictiti |
8 |
0.22% |
16 |
color |
21 |
0.58% |
55 |
monster |
8 |
0.22% |
17 |
english |
19 |
0.52% |
55 |
nonfict |
8 |
0.22% |
17 |
movabl |
19 |
0.52% |
55 |
duck |
8 |
0.22% |
19 |
dog |
18 |
0.49% |
55 |
father |
8 |
0.22% |
20 |
count |
17 |
0.47% |
61 |
hat |
7 |
0.19% |
20 |
bear |
17 |
0.47% |
61 |
moon |
7 |
0.19% |
22 |
subject |
16 |
0.44% |
61 |
individu |
7 |
0.19% |
22 |
child |
16 |
0.44% |
61 |
behavior |
7 |
0.19% |
24 |
folklor |
15 |
0.41% |
61 |
pirat |
7 |
0.19% |
24 |
cat |
15 |
0.41% |
61 |
son |
7 |
0.19% |
26 |
bedtim |
14 |
0.38% |
61 |
magic |
7 |
0.19% |
26 |
poetri |
14 |
0.38% |
68 |
train |
6 |
0.16% |
28 |
life |
13 |
0.36% |
68 |
read |
6 |
0.16% |
28 |
imagin |
13 |
0.36% |
68 |
autumn |
6 |
0.16% |
28 |
school |
13 |
0.36% |
68 |
pumpkin |
6 |
0.16% |
28 |
song |
13 |
0.36% |
68 |
bath |
6 |
0.16% |
32 |
famili |
12 |
0.33% |
68 |
butterfli |
6 |
0.16% |
32 |
natur |
12 |
0.33% |
68 |
dinosaur |
6 |
0.16% |
34 |
halloween |
11 |
0.30% |
68 |
social |
6 |
0.16% |
34 |
chicken |
11 |
0.30% |
68 |
cloth |
6 |
0.16% |
34 |
alphabet |
11 |
0.30% |
68 |
danc |
6 |
0.16% |
34 |
mother |
11 |
0.30% |
68 |
dress |
6 |
0.16% |
34 |
infanc |
11 |
0.30% |
68 |
easter |
6 |
0.16% |
39 |
charact |
10 |
0.27% |
68 |
state |
6 |
0.16% |
39 |
babi |
10 |
0.27% |
68 |
unit |
6 |
0.16% |
39 |
mice |
10 |
0.27% |
68 |
emot |
6 |
0.16% |
Top Bi-grams: Titles and Abstracts
Rank |
Bi-gram |
Freq. |
Rank |
Bi-gram |
Freq. |
1 |
picture book |
24 |
18 |
illustrations rhyming |
5 |
2 |
rhyming text |
17 |
18 |
letter alphabet |
5 |
3 |
young boy |
14 |
18 |
grades k-3 |
5 |
4 |
board book |
11 |
18 |
york times |
5 |
5 |
full color |
10 |
18 |
one day |
5 |
5 |
pete cat |
10 |
18 |
new york |
5 |
7 |
simple text |
9 |
18 |
one one |
5 |
8 |
young readers |
8 |
30 |
past four |
4 |
9 |
many things |
7 |
30 |
times bestseller |
4 |
9 |
little girl |
7 |
30 |
stop kissing |
4 |
11 |
young children |
6 |
30 |
brown bear |
4 |
11 |
ten little |
6 |
30 |
letters alphabet |
4 |
11 |
definitely wear |
6 |
30 |
heart like |
4 |
11 |
babba zarrah |
6 |
30 |
like zoo |
4 |
11 |
ice cream |
6 |
30 |
spin web |
4 |
11 |
minerva louise |
6 |
30 |
text reveal |
4 |
11 |
wear clothing |
6 |
30 |
new way |
4 |
18 |
apple pie |
5 |
30 |
animals definitely |
4 |
18 |
magic hat |
5 |
30 |
book celebrates |
4 |
18 |
white shoes |
5 |
30 |
minutes past |
4 |
18 |
board pages |
5 |
30 |
old lady |
4 |
18 |
gingerbread man |
5 |
30 |
old macdonald |
4 |
Top Bi-grams: Subject Terms
Rank |
Bi-gram |
Freq. |
Rank |
Bi-gram |
Freq. |
1 |
juvenile fiction |
412 |
33 |
fictitious character |
8 |
2 |
stories rhyme |
76 |
33 |
fiction dogs |
8 |
3 |
juvenile literature |
59 |
33 |
juvenile nonfiction |
8 |
4 |
fiction stories |
51 |
33 |
fiction domestic |
8 |
5 |
board books |
50 |
38 |
mother child |
7 |
6 |
fiction animals |
42 |
38 |
apples juvenile |
7 |
7 |
pictorial works |
41 |
38 |
fiction color |
7 |
8 |
animals fiction |
38 |
38 |
fiction family |
7 |
9 |
works juvenile |
34 |
38 |
fiction imagination |
7 |
10 |
animals juvenile |
27 |
38 |
fiction bears |
7 |
11 |
humorous stories |
26 |
38 |
child juvenile |
7 |
12 |
books specimens |
21 |
38 |
dogs juvenile |
7 |
13 |
picture books |
20 |
38 |
fiction mother |
7 |
14 |
children's stories |
19 |
38 |
rabbits fiction |
7 |
14 |
toy movable |
19 |
38 |
mice fiction |
7 |
14 |
fiction humorous |
19 |
38 |
sons fiction |
7 |
14 |
movable books |
19 |
38 |
life fiction |
7 |
14 |
fiction board |
19 |
38 |
imagination fiction |
7 |
14 |
fiction juvenile |
19 |
38 |
color fiction |
7 |
20 |
books children |
14 |
53 |
clothing dress |
6 |
21 |
fiction children's |
13 |
53 |
united states |
6 |
22 |
bedtime fiction |
12 |
53 |
parent child |
6 |
23 |
animals infancy |
11 |
53 |
baby books |
6 |
23 |
fiction picture |
11 |
53 |
infancy juvenile |
6 |
23 |
bears fiction |
11 |
53 |
cats juvenile |
6 |
26 |
domestic animals |
10 |
53 |
fiction schools |
6 |
27 |
counting juvenile |
9 |
53 |
fiction alphabet |
6 |
27 |
fiction counting |
9 |
53 |
fiction friendship |
6 |
27 |
chickens fiction |
9 |
53 |
fiction halloween |
6 |
27 |
child fiction |
9 |
53 |
fiction social |
6 |
27 |
dogs fiction |
9 |
53 |
pirates fiction |
6 |
27 |
rhyme juvenile |
9 |
53 |
play fiction |
6 |
33 |
children's songs |
8 |
53 |
books juvenile |
6 |