Evidence Summary
A Review of:
Begum, D., Roknuzzaman, M., & Shobhanee, M. E. (2022). Public
libraries’ responses to a global pandemic: Bangladesh perspectives. IFLA
Journal, 48(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211041138
Reviewed by:
David Dettman
Associate Professor and Library Instruction Program Coordinator
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Stevens Point, Wisconsin, United States of America
Email: ddettman@uwsp.edu
Received: 31 Aug. 2023 Accepted: 17
Oct. 2023
2023 Dettman.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0
International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
DOI: 10.18438/eblip30438
Objective – Examine
quantitative and qualitative data to determine the level of preparedness and
capacity to provide key resources during the recent COVID-19 global pandemic
with the goal of recommending measures to better cope with future similar
situations.
Design – Online
questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used
to analyze quantitative data, followed by a narrative analysis of the
qualitative data.
Setting – Public
libraries in Bangladesh.
Subjects – Heads of the
libraries such as directors, librarians, or librarians-in-charge.
Methods – A survey was distributed to all 71 government public libraries in
Bangladesh administered and governed by the Department of Public Libraries
under the Ministry of Cultural Affairs. The survey elicited 50 valid responses,
resulting in a response rate of 70%. A structured form questionnaire was
prepared using Google Forms and included 12 closed-ended questions with
multiple options and one open-ended question to collect librarian views on
handling services and key functions post pandemic. Telephone interviews were
conducted with eight librarians from the district public libraries.
Main Results – The data
revealed that all the libraries reported having some level of preparedness for
pandemics and disasters. However, few libraries reported high levels of
confidence in this regard. For example, 82% responded that they either had a
“low” or a “minimum” preparedness for dealing with a pandemic. The survey
revealed that none of the responding libraries were fully open to provide user
services during the COVID-19 pandemic while 100% were open for administrative
functions. Additionally, 72% reported having some sections open but others
closed, while 22% indicated that the library only provided specified services,
most of these in an online environment. Only 12% indicated that they provided
access to mobile library services.
The libraries responses to crisis management included
creating public awareness through social media campaigns (50%), supporting
other government bodies to mitigate the pandemic (46%), providing counseling
services for particular users (40%), promoting
authoritative and authentic national and global strategies on the pandemic for
the public (34%), providing pandemic-related information via phone or email on
demand (32%), and distributing relief to affected people (30%). Other activities
included organizing online social and cultural programs to reduce public
anxiety with special reference to vulnerable groups (24%), online staff
training (22%), monitoring and supervising government programs (20%), and
providing research data on the pandemic (10%).
The response to needs regarding redesigning library
programs and services for the post-pandemic world revealed that 90% of
libraries identified a need for a dedicated online service platform, 80% saw
the need to create policies related to health and safety, while 72% indicated a
need for more emphasis on digital content. The responses indicated 56% were in
favor of introducing innovative online services.
Conclusion – In response
to the results of their study, the authors make several recommendations
regarding helping the libraries of Bangladesh to cope with consequences of
future pandemics similar in scale to COVID-19. The first recommendation is to
move away from “providing services in a traditional manner,” while developing
dedicated online platforms running on high-bandwidth Internet connections
(Begum et al., 2022, p. 183). These include introducing a secure cloud-based
library automation system to provide a robust and stable information gateway.
The development of digital resources should also be a priority. This includes
both the digitization of library resources and more widespread access to an
increasing number of subscription databases.
The data indicated a strong desire among librarians to
introduce innovative library services which the authors identify as digitized
content delivery, remote access to online resources, online chat reference,
current awareness services, online programming mirroring face-to-face
programming, home delivery service for books, strategic disaster policy
development, online information literacy programs, online career counseling,
and leadership along with online training, workshops, and seminars. The authors
conclude that:
libraries face
challenges, such as transitioning to virtual services, breaking
long-established service models, funding for digital resources and its impacts
on library operations in the future, enforcing social distancing measures,
creating social awareness, and the lack of formal pandemic plans and policies
…. (Begum et al., 2022, p. 179)
In the article introduction the authors illustrate the
catastrophic impact that COVID-19 had on poverty-stricken citizens. According
to a BRAC economic report, this segment of the population experienced an 80%
drop in daily income.
Public libraries both in the United States and globally are important resources
for career training and intellectual self-improvement during the best of
economic times, and they become invaluable in times of disasters like the
global pandemic. The authors rightly echo this sentiment stating that “as
community-based organizations, public libraries have the potential to make
contributions during any natural or man-made crisis” (Begum et al., 2022, p.
185).
The authors suggest moving to an online model that will allow for the
electronic dissemination of this kind of information. Having said that, the
authors do not indicate to what degree the poor have access to technology in
the first place. If the situation mirrors that in the United States,
recommendations related to shrinking the digital divide precipitated by
economic stratification would be most welcome. If this is the case, one
recommendation might be to dedicate resources for ensuring there are access
points (e.g., local “hot spots”) in these communities for the technology “have-nots”
in times of disaster (and more generally) to share the kinds of information
that can help those struggling with poverty learn about and apply for available
social services and programs designed to provide aid, discover opportunities
for employment, and receive health and hygiene information to help slow the
spread of a virus like COVID-19.
After assessing the quality of the study using The CAT: A Generic Critical
Appraisal Tool created by Perryman and Rathbun-Grubb (2014), I found the
quality to be high. The two main authors are both professors in the Department
of Information Science and Library Management, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh,
and the third is listed as an undergraduate student of information science.
Both primary authors have published extensively on public libraries and other
issues related to library and information science. An extensive literature
review is included to help give context to the study, and the results of the
survey and interview are clearly communicated both textually and visually. The
methods employed are also clear, and the conclusion rests firmly on the
analysis of the collected data. What is lacking is any mention of the
limitations of the study and the direction further research might take. One
thing to consider would be an environmental scan of the communities dominated
by those in poverty to determine the best means for providing access to
technological devices for the purpose of connecting to library resources that
have been moved online.
Begum, D., Roknuzzaman, M., & Shobhanee, M. E. (2022). Public
libraries’ responses to a global pandemic: Bangladesh perspectives. IFLA
Journal, 48(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211041138
Perryman, C., & Rathbun-Grubb, S. (2014). The CAT: A generic
critical appraisal tool. http://www.jotform.us/cp1757/TheCat