David Sotello MDa, Paula McKenzie MDa, Marcella Rivas MDb, Richard Winn MDc
Correspondence to David Sotello MD.
Email: david.sotello@ttuhsc.edu
SWRCCC 2014;2(7):36-40
doi:10.12746/swrccc2014.0207.090
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The frequency of atypical mycobacterial or nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections has increased during the last three decades with the emergence of HIV/AIDS and more use of immunosuppressive treatments. We present a case of pulmonary mycobacterial infection secondary to Mycobacterium kansasii in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and malnutrition. M. kansasii is a ubiquitous organism, most commonly found in the southern and central regions of the US. It can occur as a colonizer, but when it produces disease it usually involves the lung. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) have issued criteria to differentiate casual NTM isolation from true pulmonary NTM disease. Among the NTM infections, M. Kansasii is the pathogen which causes a clinical picture which most resembles pulmonary tuberculosis. It can produce a bronchiectasis, nodular lesions, and/or fibrocavitary infiltrates on x-rays. Treatment requires a rifampin based regimen, usually combined with isoniazid and ethambutol. If rifampin resistance is present, macrolides, quinolones, or sulfas are usually recommended.
Keywords: Mycobacterium, nontuberculous, atypical, diagnosis, treatment
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................A 56-year-old Caucasian man with past medical
history of COPD secondary to tobacco abuse (40
packs per year of smoking) and chronic alcohol abuse
presented to the Emergency Department with several
months of increasing dyspnea, dry cough, fatigue, and
malaise. He denied fever or other symptoms. He was
using his wife’s inhalers as needed without success.
His blood pressure was 120/80 mm Hg; temperature
97.9°F; heart rate 109 beats per minute, and respirations
21 per minute. He was 74’’ tall and weighed 55
kg (body mass index of 15.6 kg/m2). On physical
examination he looked in mild respiratory distress and emaciated with temporal wasting. His chest examination
showed symmetric chest wall movement with
decreased expansion, decreased breath sounds, and
diffuse wheezing and rhonchi. The rest of his physical
examination was within normal limits. His blood
counts and chemistry panel on admission were within
normal limits. Admission arterial blood gas is shown
in Table 1. Chest radiograph showed hyperinflation of
the lungs with multiple bullae, especially in the upper
lobes. No acute infiltrates were identified (Figure
1). The patient was initially treated for a COPD exacerbation
with scheduled bronchodilators, systemic
corticosteroids, and levofloxacin 750 mg orally for 6
days without significant improvement. Purified protein
derivative (PPD) testing was negative, QuantiFERON
test was indeterminate, and HIV screening was
non-reactive. An acid-fast bacilli (AFB) stain (Ziehl-
Neelsen) showed a moderate number (3+) of acidfast
bacilli. The Infectious Diseases consult started
the patient on rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Moxifloxacin and clarithromycin were
added after reviewing the PPD and QuantiFERON
results to include nontuberculous mycobacterial coverage. AFB culture reported almost three weeks
later grew Mycobacterium kansasii.
Variable |
Patient’s value |
pH |
7.43 |
PCO2 (mm Hg) |
49.6 |
PO2 (mm Hg) |
54.8 |
HCO3 (mmol/L) |
32.2 |
PO2/FiO2 ratio |
261 |
A-a (mm Hg) |
19.2 |
FiO2 (%) |
21 |
O2 saturation (%) |
89 |
Lactate (mmol/L) |
2.16 |
Figure1: A PA chest radiograph shows hyperinflation of the lungs with multiple bullae, especially in the upper lobes; no acute infiltrates are seen.
Our report describes a case of atypical mycobacterial
infection, also known as nontuberculous mycobacteria
(NTM) infection, due to M. Kansasii. NTM
comprise all mycobacterial species other than the
obligate pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis and
Mycobacterium leprae. Typically they are found in
the environment in soil and treated water. More than
140 species have been described, but approximately
25 species cause NTM diseases. The most frequent
risk factors for NTM infections are HIV/AIDS, immunosuppressive
drugs, and preexistent lung diseases
(e.g., COPD, cystic fibrosis). These bacteria can produce
an extensive array of pathologies. Pulmonary
involvement is the most common followed by lymphadenopathy,
skin and other extrapulmonary sites, and
disseminated disease.1
The diagnosis of NTM can be challenging and
cultures from non-sterile sources like the respiratory
or digestive tract do not necessarily establish infection
or disease. The ATS and IDSA have issued statements
including a set of criteria to differentiate casual
NTM isolation from true pulmonary NTM disease.
These are summarized in Table 2. According to the
previously mentioned criteria, the diagnosis is based
on clinical, radiological, and microbiological evidence.
Symptoms are nonspecific and include chronic cough
with or without sputum production, hemoptysis, fatigue,
and malaise. Less frequently patients have
weight loss, fever, and night sweats which may indicate
advanced disease.1-2 Radiological abnormalities
follow two distinct patterns. The first is characterized
by bronchiectasis and nodular lesions, mostly involving the lingula and middle lobe; the second is characterized
by fibrocavitary lesions that mostly involve the
upper lobes and resemble pulmonary tuberculosis.
Mixed patterns can occur.3
Clinical |
1. Pulmonary symptoms, nodular or cavitary opacities on chest radiograph, or a high-resolution computed tomographic scan that shows multifocal bronchiectasis with multiple small nodules. |
and |
2. Appropriate exclusion of other diagnoses. |
Microbiologic |
1. Positive culture results from at least two separate expectorated sputum samples. If the results from the initial sputum samples are nondiagnostic, consider repeat sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears and cultures. |
or |
2. Positive culture results from at least one bronchial wash or lavage. |
or |
3. Transbronchial or other lung biopsy with mycobacterial histopathological features (granulomatous inflammation or AFB) and positive culture for NTM or biopsy showing mycobacterial histopathological features (granulomatous inflammation or AFB) and one or more sputum or bronchial washings that are culture positive for NTM. |
4. Expert consultation should be obtained when NTM are recovered that are either infrequently encountered or that usually represent environmental contamination. |
5. Patients who are suspected of having NTM lung disease but who do not meet the diagnostic criteria should be followed until the diagnosis is firmly established or excluded. |
6. Making the diagnosis of NTM lung disease does not, per se, necessitate the institution of therapy, which is a decision based on potential risks and benefits of therapy for individual patients. |
Microbiologic evidence requires at least three respiratory specimens. Sampling intervals should be at least several weeks apart, but the best interval between specimens has yet to be determined. At least two specimens should grow the same NTM species for a strong diagnosis.1 Smear microscopy is usually done in two steps. Samples are screened by fluorochrome staining, and positives are confirmed by Ziehl-Neelsen staining.1 Other molecular and biochemical techniques which might aid in the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections include radiometric cultures, detection of tuberculostearic acid (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry), mycobacterial antigens (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays), DNA probes, and nucleic acid amplification systems such as PCR.4 Histological or cytological analysis can be useful in difficult cases, including patients who do not produce sputum. Bronchoalveolar lavage is probably more sensitive that sputum culture. NTM in extrapulmonary sites may require fine-needle aspirates or local excision to obtain microbiological evidence of the disease.1,2 The choice of media for primary isolation largely determines the sensitivity. Liquid media-are, in general, more sensitive than solid media, such as Lowenstein-Jensen, Ogawa, Coletsos, and Middlebrook 7H10/7H11.1 NTM have different levels of virulence depending on the species. Patients with preexisting lung cavity or bronchiectasis can be colonized with NTM and have persistently positive NTM cultures. This is why current ATS microbiologic criteria may be useful for virulent NTM, but more demanding criteria might be preferable for less virulent NTM.5 M. kansasii is the second most NTM responsible for human disease (Table 3). It is a slow growing, photochromogenic mycobacterium usually recovered from tap water, occasionally from river or lake water, and rarely from soil and animals. Phylogenetic and molecular analyses have identified seven different subtypes. Subtype 1 is the most frequently type isolated from humans, followed by subtype 2. The clinical picture in pulmonary disease is similar to M. tuberculosis.6 Infection probably occurs by aerosol.7 Identification of isolates is usually made with high sensitivity and specificity DNA probes.7
M. avium-intracellulare |
M. kansasii |
M. xenopi |
M. fortuitum |
M. chelonae |
M. malmoense |
M. gordonae |
M. szulgai |
M. simae |
M. scrofulaceum |
M. genavense |
In the United States M. kansasii infections
occur more frequently in the southern and central regions
in a pattern described as an inverted “T” (Texas,
Louisiana, Florida, Illinois, Kansas and Nebraska). M.
kansasii usually affects middle-age white men but canaffect adults of any age, race or sex. Specific risk factors
for M. kansasii infection include pneumoconiosis,
COPD, previous mycobacterial disease, malignancy,
and alcoholism. The combination of HIV and silicosis
increases the susceptibility to infection. In HIV patients
with high CD4 counts M. kansasii is usually associated
with preexisting cavities; in patients with low
CD4 counts it is often associated with disseminated
disease. Initiation of empiric treatment may be
necessary in patients with HIV/AIDS due to the potential
for a rapidly fatal outcome. In patients with untreated
disease, extensive lung destruction can occur.
There have been no randomized trials evaluating
treatment regimens.2 Due to clinical similarities,
patients with M. kansasii infection are frequently
started on treatment for M. tuberculosis which overlaps
with the current recommendations for treatment
of M. kansasii lung disease, which include isoniazid
(300 mg/day), rifampin (600 mg/day), and ethambutol
(15 mg/kg/day) given daily for 18 months with at
least 12 months of negative sputum cultures. M. kansasii is usually resistant to pyrazinamide. Successful
therapy is considered by some experts to require
documentation of negative sputum cultures for 12
months. Rifampin is the most important component in
the treatment for M. kansasii. These isolates are less
susceptible in vitro to isoniazid and streptomycin but
are still susceptible to the achievable blood levels of
these drugs. For this reason laboratory reports with
resistance to low concentrations of these medications
have no therapeutic significance as long as a rifampin
containing regimen is used. In patients who are
intolerant to one of the above mentioned drugs,
clarithromycin can be used as a substitute. Shorter
treatment courses have shown to be effective, but
some of them show higher relapse rates. In patients
infected with rifampin-resistant M. kansasii, a three drug
regimen is recommended based on in vitro susceptibilities,
including clarithromycin or azithromycin,
moxifloxacin, ethambutol, sulfamethoxazole, or streptomycin.
Close clinical monitoring with frequent sputum
culture should be done throughout therapy. The
treatment regimen for disseminated disease is the
same as for pulmonary disease.2,7,8
In summary, NTM infection is a difficult diagnosis,
and other infections have to be considered. This usually
delays the diagnosis and the initiation of treatment.
In the presented case the most likely predisposing
factors for M. kansasii infections were severe
COPD with evidence of multiple preexistent bullae
and malnutrition (BMI 15.6). Physicians should have
high suspicion for NTM infections in patients with
known predisposing conditions and expert consultation
should be requested after obtaining a positive
culture for treatment recommendations. More studies
evaluating faster identification methods and shorter
treatment regimens are needed in the field of NTM
infections.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................