PDF

Tree-in-bud

Mohamed Attaya MDa, Eman Attaya MDb,Ebtesam Islam MD PhDc

Correspondence to Ebtesam Islam MD PhD
Email: ebtesam.islam@ttuhsc.edu

+ Author Affiliation - Author Affiliation
a a resident in radiology at Oklahoma University Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
b a radiologist at University Medical Center, Lubbock TX.
c a fellow in pulmonary medicine at TTUHSC, Lubbock, TX.

SWRCCC 2014;2(8):42-43
doi:10.12746/swrccc2014.0208.104

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

fig.1

Figure 1 CT scan with tree-in-bud pattern

fig.1

Figure 2 Drawing rendition of tree-in-bud

General

Bronchioles refer to the terminal passageways for gas exchange in the lungs. They are not normally seen on computed tomography scans due to their small size (less than or equal to 1 mm). However, in the presence of disease processes which involve the bronchioles (i.e., infectious or inflammatory conditions), they can easily be identified. Among the many patterns used to describe diseased bronchioles, the most recognized is the tree-in-bud pattern. It was initially used by JG Im to describe the endobronchial spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.1 However, since its first use in 1993 the tree-in-bud pattern has been associated with multiple etiologies.

Histopathology
The tree-in-bud pattern seen on CT represents radiologic sequelae of an infectious or inflammatory process. Generally, these often result in bronchial wall thickening with replacement of the normally air-filled lumen with mucous or pus. As a result, involved bronchioles are more conspicuous on computed tomography imaging. The tree-in-bud pattern has been likened to finger-in-glove appearance and children’s toy jacks. Figure 1 is a CT scan of a patient with tree-in-bud pattern, with a representation circled. Figure 2 is a drawing rendition of tree-in-bud.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for the tree-in-bud pattern is extensive and includes infections, congenital conditions, neoplasms, and idiopathic causes (Table).

Table: Differential diagnoses of tree-in-bud

Infections

     Bacterial

     Viral

     Fungal

Aspiration

Congenital disorders

     Cystic fibrosis

     Kartagener’s syndrome

Idiopathic conditions

     Obliterative bronchiolitis

     Diffuse panbronchiolitis

Immunologic

     Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis

Connective tissue disorders

     Sjogren’s syndrome

     Rheumatoid arthritis

Neoplasms

Respiratory infections cause about 72% of cases with 39% due to Mycobacterial cases, 27% due to other bacteria, and 3% due to viruses. Mycobacterium avium complex is the most common cause in most series.2 However, the classic cause of tree-in-bud is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, especially when it is active and contagious and associated with cavitary lesions.3 Aspiration is also a common cause of the tree-in-bud formation.1 It is important for clinicians to remember that this pattern has an extensive differential when evaluating patients. 


References

  1. Im JG, Itoh H, Shim YS, Lee JH, Ahn J, Han MC, Noma S. Pulmonary tuberculosis: CT findings--early active disease and sequential change with antituberculous therapy. Radiology 1993;186(3):653-60.
  2. Miller Jr W T, Panosian J S. Causes and Imaging Patterns of Tree-in-Bud Opacities. CHEST 2013; 144(6):1883–1892
  3. Gosset N, Bankier A, and Eisenberg R. Tree-In-Bud Pattern. Am J Roentgen 2009; 193: W472-W477.

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................


Received: 9/4/2014
Accepted: 9/20/2014
Reviewers:Isham Huizar MD
Published electronically: 10/15/2014
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: none

 

Return to top