Shrinivas Kambali MDa, Raed Alalawi MDb
Correspondence to Shrinivas Kambali MD
Email: Shrinivas.kambali@ttuhsc.edu
SWRCCC : 2013;1.(4):35-36
doi:10.12746/swrccc2013.0104.042
A 73-year-old woman presented to the hospital with a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy. She was intubated for mechanical ventilation, underwent a left heart catheterization, and had a stent placed in her LAD. Because of her cardiomyopathy, she did poorly during weaning trials. After discussions with the patient and family, she underwent an open tracheostomy and then a percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement on consecutive days. The patient was disoriented the following day, had an elevated WBC, and started on broad spectrum antibiotics. She did not have any difficulty with mechanical ventilation at this time. There was no air leak or changes in peak airway pressures. There was no difficulty in passing the suction catheter through the tracheostomy tube. Clinical examination did not reveal any subcutaneous emphysema. A chest x-ray did not show any obvious pathology. She was tolerating her enteral feeding well. An abdominal ultrasound did not reveal any abnormality. She had a bronchoscopy through the tracheostomy which showed minimal secretions, a normal carina, and normal left and right bronchial trees (Figure1). The bronchoscope was then introduced through the mouth to evaluate the hypopharynx and cricopharynx. She had acquired a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) with an inflated tracheostomy cuff visible in the esophagus (Figure 2). Methylene blue was injected to the stomach through the PEG tube; this procedure was negative for a gastropulmonary fistula.
Figure 1&2
Acquired nonmalignant TEF in adults is very rare.1 The most common etiology is intubation with cuff-related tracheal injury. Our patient did not have any TEF before the EGD procedure during the PEG tube placement, and this is the probable cause of her fistula formation. Potential risk factors which could increase the risk for the TEF formation are her history of tracheostomy on the previous day, endotracheal intubation injury, increased cuff pressure in the endotracheal and the tracheostomy tube, her history of current steroid use, and diabetes. Some of these risk factors could cause TEF independently. The incidence of esophageal perforation during upper endoscopy is estimated at 0.03% and 0.11% during rigid endoscopy.2,3,4 The most common sites of iatrogenic esophageal perforation are at the normal anatomic narrowing in the hypopharynx or the cervical esophageal secondary to force exerted in attempting to pass the endoscope through the cricopharynx.2 It is most commonly associated with upper endoscopy interventions, such as esophageal dilation, high inflation pressure, previous laser or sclerotherapy, and history of esophageal cancer. Iatrogenic esophageal perforation during transesophageal echocardiography is a well-known cause of esophageal perforation and occurs with an incidence of 0.18%.2,5 In 1972 Hugh Harley reported 44 cases of TEF associated with tracheostomy with the estimated incidence to be 1 in 200.6 Jugn et al. reported a case of TEF through esophageal diverticulum in a patient who had a prolonged tracheostomy tube.7 Other documented causes are tracheostomy, lung transplantation, thyroid resection, thoracic aneurysm repair, esophageal leiomyoma enucleation, mediastinoscopy, and cervical spine surgery.2,8,9,10,11
Common presentations include cough, recurrent pneumonia, increased secretions, and evidence of gastric aspiration into the trachea while on the ventilator.1 The cuff can completely occlude the fistula which might cause atypical presentations with less cough and fewer secretions. A high index of suspicion is very important in patients who have undergone procedures or have prolonged ventilator support with tracheostomy tubes. Bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy can help in the diagnosis of TEF.1
Immediate treatment includes placement of the cuff beyond the fistula to prevent more aspiration. Spontaneous closure is very rare, and surgical closure is usually indicated in most patients.1 Surgery should be postponed till the patient is weaned from the mechanical ventilation because high positive pressure ventilation can increase the chances of dehiscence, persistence of the fistula, and stenosis.1 Malignant TEF has apoor prognosis, and esophageal bypass and stenting are commonly used to treat malignant TEF.1
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Received: 09/10/2013
Accepted: 09/14/2013
Reviewers: Kenneth Nugent MD
Published electronically: 10/15/2013
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: none