Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín
0304-2847
2248-7026
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n3.90246

Recibido: 18 de octubre de 2020; Aceptado: 2 de junio de 2021

Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus added to a starch coating related to the microbiological contamination, quality and acceptability of fresh cheese

Efecto de Lactobacillus acidophilus añadido a un revestimiento de almidón en relación a la contaminación microbiológica, calidad y aceptabilidad de queso fresco

S. Santacruz, 1

Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Ecuador. stalin.santacruz@gmail.com Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí Ecuador

ABSTRACT

The fresh cheese produced in the province of Manabí is an Ecuadorian artisan cheese. The processing conditions commonly do not comply Ecuadorian regulations, resulting in the presence of pathogenic microorganisms such as Salmonella. The high number of cases of Salmonellosis in the province of Manabí justifies the need to identify and control the possible sources of this pathogenic microorganism. In the present work, the effect of the addition of Lactobacillus acidophilus to fresh cheese was studied, by immersing it in a starch solution with 1x108 CFU mL-1 of L. acidophilus with further storage for 30 days at 4 °C. The pH, acidity, weight loss, instrumental firmness, number of CFU of mesophilic aerobic bacteria and acceptability of fresh cheese were analyzed. At the same time, a duo-trio analysis was carried out, followed by a satisfaction analysis with the participation of semi-trained panelists. The presence of L. acidophilus reduced the pH and acidity in the fresh cheese in relation to the control sample. Satisfaction results, on a five-point hedonic scale, which ranged from 1 (I dislike it very much) to 5 (I like it very much), showed that the cheese treated with L. acidophilus and the control sample received a rating between "I neither like nor dislike" and "I like it moderately", with values of 3.63 for the treated sample and 3.50 for the control. The application of L. acidophilus did not affect the organoleptic acceptability of cheese and produced less changes in pH, acidity and weight loss during storage for 30 days at 4 °C in relation to the control sample.

Keywords:

Coated cheese, Inhibition, Salmonella, Satisfaction test, Sensory analysis.

RESUMEN

El queso fresco producido en la provincia de Manabí es un queso artesanal ecuatoriano, cuyas condiciones de procesamiento comúnmente no cumplen con la normativa ecuatoriana, dando como resultado la presencia de microorganismos patógenos como la Salmonella. El alto número de casos de Salmonelosis en la provincia de Manabí justifica la necesidad de identificar y controlar las posibles fuentes de este microorganismo patógeno. En el presente trabajo se estudió el efecto de la adición de Lactobacillus acidophilus al queso fresco, mediante la inmersión de este en una solución de almidón con 1x108 UFC mL-1 de L. acidophilus y su posterior almacenamiento por 30 días a 4 °C, durante los cuales se analizó el pH, acidez, pérdida de peso, firmeza instrumental, número de UFC de bacterias aerobias mesófilas y satisfacción del queso fresco. Al mismo tiempo se realizó un análisis dúo-trío y seguidamente uno de satisfacción con la participación de panelistas semientrenados. La presencia de Lactobacillus acidophilus redujo el pH y acidez en el queso fresco en relación con la muestra control. Los resultados de satisfacción, en una escala hedónica de cinco puntos, que varió desde 1 (me desagrada mucho) a 5 (me agrada mucho), mostraron que el queso tratado con L. acidophilus y la muestra control recibieron una calificación entre "ni me gusta ni me disgusta" y "me gusta moderadamente", con valores de 3.63 para la muestra tratada y 3.50 para el control. La aplicación de L. acidophilus no afectó el nivel de agrado de los panelistas por el queso fresco y produjo menores cambios de pH, acidez y pérdida de peso durante su almacenamiento por 30 días a 4 °C en relación a la muestra control.

Palabras clave:

Queso recubierto, Inhibición, Salmonella, Prueba de satisfacción, Análisis sensorial.

Fresh cheese produced in Manabí province is an Ecuadorian artisan cheese with a moisture of 37% (Minga and Pérez, 2019), with good acceptance among consumers, especially in the province of Manabí (Ecuadorian coast). Previous studies have shown that fresh cheese processing does not fulfill Ecuadorian regulations due to the presence of pathogenic microorganisms such as Salmonella (Zambrano, 2014). Additionally, during the commercialization the cold chain is affected in some points, since the cheese is exhibited at 25 °C, which increases the microbiological load affecting the health of consumers (Lobacz, 2020). Salmonellosis cases in the province of Manabí, Ecuador are around 600 annually (Ministerio de Salud Pública, 2015-2018). The presence of Salmonella and other pathogenic microorganisms has been detected in cheeses from Mexico (Plumb et al., 2019) and Egypt (El-Baz et al., 2017) among others.

Several authors have studied the control of pathogenic microorganisms in different varieties of cheese such as the control of E. coli, S. enterica, B. cereus, S. scuiri and P. aeruginosa using lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (Al-Gamal et al., 2019); the inoculation of L. rhamnosus in semi-hard goat cheese to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria (Rodrigues et al., 2015) and the use of L. acidophilus to control the development of mesophilic aerobic bacteria and Salmonella in fresh cheese (Santacruz and Castro, 2018).

Coating is a layer that works as barrier against moisture, gases, loss of aroma and flavors of food. At the same time, it can act as carriers of antimicrobial microorganisms or substances (Guimarães et al., 2018). In fact, coatings have been used in cheese preservation, reducing water loss and spoilage damage (Costa et al., 2018). Moreover, the effect of coatings on several types of cheeses have been studied previously such as Gouda (Göksen et al., 2020); Port Salut (Ollé et al., 2014); Kashar (Kavas et al., 2015) among others.

The present work is a complementary study of a previous work where the growth of mesophilic aerobic bacteria and Salmonella in fresh cheese could be inhibited using L. acidophilus. The effect of a cassava starch + L. acidophilus as a coating on fresh cheese was studied, evaluating its acidity, pH, weight loss, firmness and counting of mesophilic aerobic bacteria during 30 days of storage at 4 °C. Additionally, the difference of satisfaction among panelists was evaluated for coated and uncoated cheeses.

MATERIALS Y METHODS

Strains of L. acidophilus were obtained from Chr. Hansen A/S (Denmark). The fresh cheese was purchased in stores located in the center of the city of Manta, Ecuador.

Preparation of coated cheese

The fresh cheese was coated with a starch + L. acidophilus (SL) film. A Cassava starch solution 1% (w/v) was prepared according to Santacruz et al. (2015), with slight modifications. The starch solution was heated with constant stirring from room temperature (approximately 25 °C) to 90 °C, keeping this temperature for 5 min. Afterwards, the mixture was homogenized with an ultraturrax (Polytron, Switzerland) at 11,000 rpm for 4 min. Free L. acidophilus was added to the starch solution guaranteeing a starch coating with an absorbance between 0.08 and 0.1, measured at 625 nm (Medina et al., 2005). This absorbance guaranteed an equivalent of 1x108 CFU mL-1 of L. acidophilus of starch solution.

The fresh cheese was immersed in the previous solution for 5 min, dried at room temperature and finally transferred to plastic bags before storage for 30 days at 4 °C. Every day during storage, cheese was taken out from refrigerator and kept at room temperature for 8 h, then placed again into the refrigerator. This procedure allowed to simulate commercialization conditions.

Physical, chemical and microbiological analyses of fresh cheese

Cheese samples previously coated with a SL film were analyzed after 0, 10, 20 and 30 days of storage at 4 °C. Moisture content, titratable acidity, pH, and firmness of the cheese were examined. Moisture content was determined according to method 15.259 (AOAC, 1984), titratable acidity with method 16.276 (AOAC, 1984), pH was measured using a potentiometer (HANNA, Germany), firmness was measured as the maximum force (N) required to penetrate cheese cubes with a side length of 5 cm, using a texturometer (SHIMADZU EZ-XL, Japan). For the penetration test, a 2 mm diameter penetration probe was used at a speed of 20 mm s-1, with a penetration depth of 15 mm (Santacruz, 2021). The determination of mesophilic aerobic bacteria was carried out according to Castro et al., (2014). Uncoated cheese was used as a control sample for all analyzes.

Sensory analysis

Sensory analyses were done at 0 day of storage only, with cheese containing no Salmonella. This avoided health problems to panelists due to the growth of mesophilic aerobic bacteria in cheese during storage. Presence of Salmonella was analyzed by the Ecuadorian regulation for microbiological food control (INEN, 2015). For this stage, eight semi-trained panelists were involved in both tests (UPAEP, 2014). The panelists were previously chosen based on their ability to identify basic flavors (Sharif et al., 2017). First, a duo-trio test was carried out in two sessions, which aimed to determine if there was a difference between the sample coated with SL and the control sample. In this case, the number of correct responses was determined for a probability level of 5%. Afterwards, a satisfaction test was performed using a 5-point verbal hedonic scale (Wadhwani and McMahon, 2012), with a scale ranging from "I like it a lot" (5) to "I dislike it a lot" (1).

Statistical analyses

Comparisons of control sample with coated cheese with a SL film were analyzed by means of an IBM SPSS Statistics software, using a one-way ANOVA (significance level of 5%). All measurements were made in triplicate.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The presence of L. acidophilus in cheese caused a lower pH and acidity compared to the control sample after 30 days of storage. Similar results were obtained by Mozuriene et al. (2016). The lower presence of mesophilic aerobic bacteria due to the inhibitory action of L. acidophilus may trigger a lower production of acidic metabolites and thus a lower acidity. Additionally, the increase of L. acidophilus may be responsible of a higher production of organic acids that act as buffer, controlling the increase of pH during storage. Regarding the weight loss, coated cheese showed a lower loss compared to control sample. The coating may act as a barrier against moisture loss.

Results of microbiological analyzes showed that control cheese had a higher quantity of mesophilic aerobic bacteria than the sample coated with L. acidophilus (P<0.05, Table 1). Santacruz and Castro (2018) showed that viability of L. acidophilus decreased along storage, however the viable cells inhibited the development of mesophilic aerobic (Mozuriene et al., 2016) and Salmonella. Coatings were able to control the release of the antimicrobial agents on the cheese surface improving the microbiological quality of the cheese (Santacruz and Castro, 2018; Krishnan et al., 2015) and Salmonella spp. in fresh cheese. Previous studies showed the inhibition of E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. enteritidis by LAB (Winkowski et al., 1993; Lord, 2002). The presence of LAB could inhibit microorganisms through the production of bacteriocins (Aymerich et al., 2000).

Table 1: pH, acidity, weight loss, firmness and mesophilic aerobic bacteria counting in cheese stored at 4 °C during 30 days.

Sensory analysis

Results of the duo-trio test showed that the number of correct responses was 12 of 16, which showed a difference between the cheese samples coated with L. acidophilus compared to control sample (Wittig, 2001). Another aspect to evaluate was the sensorial acceptation by the panelists. The results showed that there was no difference in panelists satisfaction between coated and control sample (P<0.05). Both received a rating between "I neither like nor dislike" and "I like it moderately", with values of 3.63 and 3.50 for coated and control sample, respectively. Previous works showed similar results; in fact, LAB strains increased the acceptability and shelf-life of unripe curd cheese (Mozuriene et al., 2016). Coelho et al. (2014) found no significant differences in overall sensory evaluation of fresh cheese. Even after the addition of L. acidophilus, the semi-hard goat cheese showed better sensory scores in the acceptance test (Fernandes et al., 2012). The SL film could be used as an agent to control the growth of mesophilic aerobic bacteria in fresh cheese with no changes on the satisfaction among consumers.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a cassava starch +L. acidophilus film inhibited the development of mesophilic aerobic in fresh cheese showing no difference in panelists satisfaction between coated and control sample. SL film-coated cheese could act as a barrier against moisture loss and may be a promising option to control mesophilic aerobic bacteria in fresh cheese during storage under refrigeration conditions with no changes in consumers satisfaction.

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. E.U.A. 14a Ed. Washington, D.C. 🠔
  2. Al-Gamal M, Ibrahim G, Sharaf O, Dabiza N, Youssef A and El-Ssayad M. 2019. The protective potential of selected lactic acid bacteria against the most common contaminants in various types of cheese in Egypt. Heliyon 5(e01362): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01362 [URL] 🠔
  3. Aymerich M, Garriga M and Hugas M. 2000. Bacteriocin-producing lactobacilli in Spanish-style fermented sausages: characterization of bacteriocins. Food Microbiology 17: 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1999.0275 [URL] 🠔
  4. Castro M, Rivadeneira C, Mantuano M, Santacruz S and Ziani K. 2014. Aplicación de recubrimientos comestibles a base de quitosano y Aloe vera sobre papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. "Maradol") cortada. Alimentos, Ciencia e Ingeniería 22(2): 05-12. https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/handle/123456789/24548 [URL] 🠔
  5. Coelho M, Silva C, Ribeiro S, Dapkevicius M and Rosa H. 2014. Control of Listeria monocytogenes in fresh cheese using protective lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology 191: 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.029 [URL] 🠔
  6. Costa J, Maciel L, Texeira J, Vicente A and Cerquiera M. 2018. Use of edible films and coatings in cheese preservation: Opportunities and challenges. Food Research International 107: 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.013 [URL] 🠔
  7. El-Baz A, El-Sherbini M, Abdelkhalek A and Al-Ashmawy M. 2017. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Salmonella serovars in milk and cheese in Mansoura city, Egypt. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research 4: 45-51. http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2017.d189 [URL] 🠔
  8. Fernandes E, de Oliveira M, Queiroga R, Machado T and de Souza E. 2012. Development and quality of a Brazilian semi-hard goat cheese (coalho) with added probiotic lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 63: 947-956. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2012.687367 [URL] 🠔
  9. Guimarães A, Abrunhosa L, Pastrana L and Cerqueira M. 2018. Edible films and coatings as carriers of living microorganisms: a new strategy towards biopreservation and healthier foods. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 17: 594-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12345 [URL] 🠔
  10. Göksen G, Fabra M, Ekiz H and López-Rubio A. 2020. Phytochemical-loaded electrospun nanofibers as novel active edible films: characterization and antibacterial efficiency in cheese slices. Food Control 112: 107133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107133 [URL] 🠔
  11. INEN. 2015. Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalización. Quesos elaborados con mezcla de leches. Requisitos. Norma técnica ecuatoriana NTE INEN 3067:2015. Instituto Nacional Ecuatoriano de Normalización. Quito, Ecuador. 🠔
  12. Kavas G, Kavas N and Saygili D. 2015. The effects of thyme and clove essential oil fortified edible films on the physical, chemical and microbiological characteristics of Kashar cheese. Journal of Food Quality 38: 405-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12157 [URL] 🠔
  13. Krishnan K, Babuskin S, Rakhavan K, Tharavin R, Babu A, Sivarajan M and Sukumar M. 2015. Potential application of corn starch edible films with spice essential oils for the shelf-life extension of red meat. Journal of Applied Microbiology 119: 1613-1623. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12932 [URL] 🠔
  14. Lobacz A, Kowalik J and Zulewska J. 2020. Determination of the survival kinetics of Salmonella spp. on the surface of ripened raw milk cheese during storage at different temperatures. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 55: 610-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14315 [URL] 🠔
  15. Lord E. 2002. Utilización de Lactobacillus acidophilus como agente antagónico para el control de Salmonella enteritidis en pescado. Tesis. Cartago: Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica. Costa Rica. 63 p 🠔
  16. Medina A, Moreno L, Velasco M y Gutiérrez S. 2005. Estudio comparativo de medios de cultivo para crecimiento y recuperación del Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 "in vitro". Nova 3: 1-120. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.15 [URL] 🠔
  17. Minga I y Perez X. 2019. Estudio de obtención de Queso Manaba Chonero deshidratado, y su aplicación en la culinaria. Tesis. Universidad de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador, 169 p. 🠔
  18. Ministerio de Salud Pública. 2015-2018. Gaceta epidemiológica Ecuador. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Quito, Ecuador 🠔
  19. Mozuriene E, Bartkiene E, Juodeikiene G, Zadeike D, Basinskiene L, Maruska A, Stankevicius M, Ragazinskiene O, Damasius J and Cizeikiene D. 2016. The effect of savoury plants, fermented with lactic acid bacteria, on the microbiological contamination, quality, and acceptability of unripened curd cheese. LWT - Food Science and Technology 69: 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.027 [URL] 🠔
  20. Ollé C, Gerschenson L and Jagus R. 2014. Natamycin and nisin supported on starch edible films for controlling mixed culture growth on model systems and Port Salut cheese. Food Control 44: 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.054 [URL] 🠔
  21. Plumb I, Schwensohn C, Gieraltowski L, Tecle S, Schneider Z, Freiman J, Cote A, Noveroske D, Kolsin J, Brandenburg J, Chen J, Tagg K, White P, Shah H, Watkins L, Wise M and Friedman C. 2019. Outbreak of Salmonella Newport infections with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin linked to beef obtained in the United States and soft cheese obtained in Mexico-United States, 2018-2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 68: 713-717 🠔
  22. Rodrigues F, Rolim L, Olbrichdos K, Carneiro de Barcelos S, Sílvio do Egito A, Santana T, Lúcia da Conceição M, Magnani M, Gomes de Oliveira M and Ramos R. 2015. Survival ofLactobacillus rhamnosusEM1107 in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and its inhibitory effect against pathogenic bacteria in semi-hard goat cheese. LWT- Food Science and Technology 63: 807-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.004 [URL] 🠔
  23. Santacruz S, Rivadeneira C and Castro M. 2015. Edible films based on starch and chitosan. Effect of starch source and concentration, plasticizer, surfactant’s hydrophobic tail and mechanical treatment. Food Hydrocolloids 49: 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.03.019 [URL] 🠔
  24. Santacruz S and Castro M. 2018. Viability of free and encapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus incorporated to cassava starch edible films and its application to Manaba fresh white cheese. LWT Food Science and Technology 93: 570-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.016 [URL] 🠔
  25. Santacruz S. 2021. Edible coatings based on cassava starch, salicylic acid and essential oils for preservation of fresh-cut mango. Revista Facultad Nacional Agronomía Medellín 74: 9461-9469. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n1.83837 [URL] 🠔
  26. Sharif M, Butt M, Sharif H and Nasir M. 2017. Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability. pp 376-378. In: Zahoor T and Butt M. (eds). Handbook of Food Science and Technology. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. 437 p. 🠔
  27. UPAEP. 2014. Análisis sensorial. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Puebla. Puebla, Mexico. 🠔
  28. Winkowski K, Crandall A and Montville T. 1993. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by Lactobacillus bavaricus in beef at refrigeration temperature. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 2552-2557. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.8.2552-2557.1993 [URL] 🠔
  29. Wadhwani R and McMahon D. 2012. Color of low-fat cheese influences flavor perception and consumer liking. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 2336-2346. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5142 [URL] 🠔
  30. Wittig E. 2001. Evaluación sensorial, una metodología actual para la tecnología de alimentos. Biblioteca digital de la Universidad de Chile. Santiago de Chile, Chile. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/121431 [URL] 🠔
  31. Zambrano M. 2014. Determinación de la presencia de Salmonella en queso fresco comercializado en el cantón Chone provincia de Manabí entre Mayo y Julio del 2014. Tesis. Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador. 41 p 🠔