About the Author(s)


Mareike Rabe Email symbol
Family Physician, Locum in Public and Private Practice, Cape Town, South Africa

Citation


Rabe M. Telehealth in South Africa: A guide for healthcare practitioners in primary care. S Afr Fam Pract. 2022;64(1), a5533. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v64i1.5533

CPD Article

Telehealth in South Africa: A guide for healthcare practitioners in primary care

Mareike Rabe

Received: 15 Mar. 2022; Accepted: 29 Apr. 2022; Published: 28 June 2022

Copyright: © 2022. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The use of telehealth is becoming a prevalent feature in clinical practice worldwide, partly because of advances in medical and telecommunications technology. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a key driver in justifying the accelerated use of telehealth, leading to healthcare practitioners (HCPs) utilising virtual consultations more avidly. Although challenges remain, recent data have shown that remote consultations are feasible, safe and effective in South Africa (SA) and that HCPs should become proficient in conducting telehealth, virtual or remote consultations. These guidelines are based on the revised Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) General Ethical Guidelines for Good Practice in Telehealth (Booklet 10) and guidelines on remote or video consultations from the University of Oxford, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Psychiatrists. These guidelines aim to equip HCPs with the basic knowledge and skills pertaining to medicolegal, communication and practical aspects of telehealth and how to practise telehealth safely and effectively in primary care settings in SA during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Keywords: telehealth; virtual consultations; remote consultations; primary care; guidelines; ethics; medicolegal; communication.

Introduction

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced healthcare practitioners (HCPs) to reconsider and reinvent their interactions with patients. Social distancing and the redeployment of HCPs to fight the pandemic meant that conventional physical or face-to-face consultations were no longer feasible, acceptable and accessible to many patients and HCPs alike. The term ‘telehealth’ is preferred over the previously used term ‘telemedicine’ as it is more inclusive and accommodates all relevant professionals who practise telehealth.1 Telehealth has been practised by HCPs for many years, especially by telephone.2 Video consultations have become a more prominent feature of telehealth service delivery globally, including in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), although many challenges remain regardless of the platform used. These challenges include infrastructural, technological, organisational, legal and regulatory, ethical, knowledge and awareness, financial and cultural resistance barriers to telehealth implementation.3,4,5,6

Promisingly, a study performed during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Western Cape province has shown that a dedicated telehealth service led to positive outcomes for specific patient groups and HCPs and demonstrated the development of virtual doctor–patient relationships, a decrease in mortality and an increase in cost-effectiveness.7 Healthcare practitioners should be mindful that the aforementioned study was conducted within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and further research is needed to assess the performance of a dedicated telehealth service in the context of general healthcare consultations.

A systematic review by Mbunge et al. compiled five recommendations for the effective integration of telehealth service in SSA. Firstly, international organisations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) should lead the way by conducting training workshops with HCPs on the potential role of telehealth in providing quality healthcare in SSA. Secondly, standard telehealth policies and frameworks should be designed specifically for the SSA context to address the needs of HCPs who practise telehealth in the region. Thirdly, import duties on telemedicine equipment should be done away with or subsidised by governments to encourage the use of telehealth hardware and software amongst HCPs. Fourthly, multisectoral consultative processes which involve community members should be undertaken to create and expand networks and bridge the current digital divide in SSA. Finally, regulatory procedures around telehealth service delivery should be provided by regulatory authorities in a robust and unrestricted manner.5

Heeding the lessons learned during COVID-19 pandemic, HCPs in South Africa (SA) should become well-equipped to deliver healthcare services sufficiently in this new era of telehealth. Its application is specifically useful in certain population groups such as people who are incarcerated, people who live with disabilities, people who require psychotherapy or physical therapy and patients with well-controlled chronic diseases who require prescription renewals.8

Telehealth is defined as the application of electronic telecommunications, information technology or other electronic means to administer healthcare services in two separate geographic locations for the purpose of facilitating, improving and enhancing clinical, educational and research outcomes, particularly to under-serviced communities in SA. Telehealth is a blanket term that covers all components and activities of healthcare and the healthcare system that are conducted through telecommunications technology.1 Telemedicine services on the other hand include teleconsultation, telecounselling, telescreening, telediagnosis, real-time communication and telemonitoring.5 Telehealth services may be delivered synchronously or asynchronously. The former refers to telehealth services that are delivered in real time, such as by telephone consultations. The latter refers to telehealth services that are not delivered in real time, for example, using email to communicate.1

According to a general household survey conducted by Statistics SA in 2017, 16.9% of South Africans (or 9.5 million people) were covered by a medical aid scheme.9 This means that at least 45 million South Africans are still largely dependent on public healthcare.10 Over 36 million South Africans accessed the Internet through any kind of mobile device in 2021. This figure is projected to increase by 17.5% in 2026, meaning that 43 million South Africans will be mobile Internet users.11 One-third or about 22 million people in SA currently use smartphones.12 Based on the above information, these guidelines are aimed at HCPs who work in the public health sector of SA, as this group constitutes the majority of the South African population.

These guidelines are aligned and should be read in conjunction with the revised Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) General Ethical Guidelines for Good Practice in Telehealth (Booklet 10, the term which will be used to refer to these guidelines throughout this article)1 as well as published guidelines about telehealth, remote and video consulting from the University of Oxford, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) and the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP).13,14,15,16

These guidelines aim to equip HCPs with the basic knowledge and skills pertaining to medicolegal, communication and practical aspects of telehealth and how to practise telehealth safely and effectively in primary care settings in SA during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. These guidelines should be seen as an introductory overview of telehealth and its application in the context of low-income and middle-income countries in SSA where telephone consultations may be more feasible, with the view of expanding to video consultations as resources and technology become increasingly available and accessible.

How to navigate the telehealth medicolegal landscape in South Africa

Should telehealth consultations be viewed in the same way as physical consultations by healthcare practitioners?

Healthcare practitioners who conduct telehealth consultations are held to the same standards of professional practice as HCPs who conduct physical consultations and will be measured against what the reasonable HCP would do under similar circumstances should complaints arise or legal action ensue in this milieu.1 Do not supersede or go above and beyond what you would do during a physical consultation when conducting a telehealth consultation. For example, during a telephone consultation, do not diagnose and/or treat atrial fibrillation in a patient who was not known to have this condition previously and has not undergone a physical examination and electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis to confirm the arrhythmia. Other questions HCPs should ask include:13

  • How do you normally prepare for or conduct a physical consultation?
  • How would you shift these preparations for a telephone or video consultation?
  • What would you need to change to ensure the same level of assessment and care is conducted if you are using a telephone or video consultation?

In both the public and private health sectors, it is pertinent to develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) and protocols pertaining to telehealth services. Quality improvement principles could be implemented to ensure the appropriate allocation of resources.17 The steps could include an initial assessment of patients’ views around the feasibility and acceptability of telephone or video consultations in their facility or setting. Flowing from these inputs, online appointment schedules for outpatient department visits could be set up by using a booking system that works for the facility. Healthcare practitioners could then be allocated to ‘virtual queues’ to screen and triage patients seeking chronic care and those who have undifferentiated or acute problems. It is imperative that a safeguard system is in place to ensure that, should patients need to undergo a physical examination or further care outside the scope of what telehealth can provide, they know where to go and how to access these services in a timely manner.

Should a relationship exist between healthcare practitioners and patients before telehealth consultations occur?

Prior to the revision of Booklet 10 in December 2021, the HPCSA advised that telehealth consultations should occur between HCPs and patients only when they had established professional relationships. This meant that the patient’s health records had to be available to the treating HCP, and/or the patient was known to the HCP prior to the telehealth interaction between the two parties.18 These guidelines were applicable in a context where a ‘servicing’ HCP who consulted with the patient face-to-face treated the patient in conjunction with a ‘consulting’ HCP after attaining the latter’s input from a remote location. For example, a community service doctor (the servicing HCP in a primary care clinic) shares relevant clinical, laboratory and radiological information about a patient who underwent a tuberculosis work-up with a senior colleague (the consulting HCP in a district hospital) to decide on appropriate further management of the patient. The revised guidelines state that although an established professional relationship is desirable, it is not a compulsory prerequisite for telehealth interactions between HCPs and patients. When a HCP agrees to treat a patient and the latter provides informed consent to be treated, the professional relationship is established according to the updated Booklet 10.1

Booklet 10 further states that telehealth consultations are not a substitute for physical consultations but should resemble them as closely as possible. Healthcare practitioners should not exclusively use telehealth consultations to deliver healthcare services in their practice; that is, physical consultations should still be the foundation of healthcare service delivery. Telehealth interactions should only be used when it is in the best clinical interest of patients.1

Which device(s) and/or platform(s) should be used to conduct telehealth consultations?

Booklet 10 clearly states that ‘any suitable Information and Communication Technology (ICT) platforms’ may be used to ‘exchange information for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and injuries, research, and evaluation, and for the continuing education of HCPs’.1 Booklet 10, however, discourages the use of social media platforms to communicate with patients as ‘a failure to maintain strictly professional relationships with patients could result in ethical dilemmas’.1 The onus rests on HCPs to ensure that the device(s) and platform(s) used to deliver telehealth services are password-protected with updated antivirus and other software, such as virtual private networks (VPNs), to ensure patient confidentiality is maintained and interactions are secured and aligned with the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA).19

When is it unsafe to conduct a telehealth consultation?

The decision to offer a remote consultation as opposed to a physical consultation should always take into account the following:13,14,15,16

  • The potential for serious, high-risk conditions where a physical examination is necessary – for example, in a patient known with ischaemic heart disease who complains of more frequently occurring chest pain, chest pain that lasts for longer periods of time, chest pain at rest, or chest pain which is not relieved by standard therapy.
  • Where a physical examination cannot be deferred or is not possible to conduct virtually, such as an internal gynaecological examination.
  • Comorbidities or conditions which may affect the patient’s ability to use the technology – for example, advanced dementia or serious anxiety about or refusal to use the technology.
  • Patient vulnerability – for example, mental healthcare users, children, people who live with disabilities (including people who are sight- and/or hearing-impaired), older age, multimorbidity.

Should HCPs have any uncertainty that a telehealth consultation is not in the best interest of the patient, a physical consultation should be recommended and arranged. On the other hand, HCPs should guard against bias and generalisation towards certain population groups in terms of the suitability of a telehealth consultation and consider each case individually.16 For example, an older person may be well-equipped and knowledgeable about the use of technology for video interactions, but the HCP assumes that this is not suitable without checking with the patient. Similarly, it is important to consider current epidemiological factors such as peaks of disease outbreaks and risk stratification for high-risk individuals, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic.16

How should record-keeping occur for telehealth consultations?

As is the case when conducting physical consultations, record-keeping during telehealth interactions is vitally important. Clinical notes should be handwritten or captured electronically and stored in a manner to maintain patient privacy and confidentiality. Healthcare practitioners should be mindful to not appear distracted by writing extensive clinical notes during telehealth consultations and allow ample time between consultations to ensure that patient records are updated. The Medical Protection Society (MPS) recommends that telehealth consultations should not be recorded by HCPs. It should be standard practice for HCPs to inform patients that telehealth consultations are live-streamed and check with patients whether they are recording interactions. If a patient reports that they are recording the interaction, their reasons should be explored respectfully and documented. Healthcare practitioners cannot force patients to stop recording interactions or refuse to continue with interactions when being recorded. If a physical consultation is deemed necessary in such circumstances, consultations should be converted appropriately.20

A proposed template for initiating a telehealth consultation

‘Hello, my name is Doctor …

Before we continue, may I confirm that you can see and hear me clearly?

Thank you for completing the triage and consent questionnaires earlier. May I check whether anything has changed since you completed these questionnaires?

May I check that you are Mrs …, residing at … and that your date of birth is …?

Are you currently at your place of residence or elsewhere?

This consultation is being live-streamed, which means that I am not recording this interaction. May I check whether you are recording this interaction?

There is no one else in the room with me; may I check whether someone is with you at the moment? May we speak freely?

If there is a technical or other problem during this consultation, may I confirm that the alternative number where I may reach you is …?

I will be making notes now and then to make sure I don’t miss anything, but you will still have my full attention even if I don’t look at you all the time.

What were you hoping I would do for you today?’

Table 1 summarises important information which should be documented for telehealth interactions. It also provides a practical how-to approach to telehealth consultations. Table 1 is adapted from resources of the University of Oxford and the RACGP, as well as the RCP, specifically relating to the ‘6 Cs’ of video consultation (competence, confidence, consent, confidentiality, communication and contingencies), which are integrated throughout the table.13,14,15,16

TABLE 1: How to interact with patients remotely: communication considerations and practicalities.

Conclusion

The manner in which HCPs engage with patients and vice versa has changed considerably during recent years, partly because of medical and telecommunications advances. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an escalation in the use of telehealth in everyday medical practice. Healthcare practitioners should become proficient in terms of basic knowledge and skills to navigate this new landscape so as to ensure patients are assisted in an ethical, systematic, efficient and safe manner using different platforms.

Further reading

These guidelines provide an introductory overview to telehealth in SA. It is beyond the scope of this article to address subjects such as how to conduct remote consultations in specific specialities of clinical practice, how to interact with colleagues remotely (between the so-called servicing and consulting HCPs), how to break bad news remotely, how to e-prescribe and how to use social media in clinical practice. The author recommends the following resources for further reading:

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the HPCSA for their commitment to update their guidelines on telehealth in SA, as well as the MPS and other organisations for their continued support of and engagement with HCPs and the HPCSA to develop and enhance access to telehealth in under-served communities in SA. The author acknowledges all frontline primary care HCPs for their resilience and commitment to providing quality healthcare to the population of SA in these trying times.

Competing interests

The author declares that she has no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced her in writing this article.

Author’s contributions

I declare that I am the sole author of this article.

Ethical considerations

This article followed all ethical standards for research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.

Funding information

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the author.

References

  1. Health Professions Council of South Africa Legal and Regulatory Affairs. General ethical guidelines for good practice in telehealth: Booklet No. 10 [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.hpcsa.co.za/?contentId=79
  2. Car J, Sheikh A. Telephone consultations. BMJ. 2003;326(7396):966–969. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7396.966
  3. Chitungo I, Mhango M, Mbunge E, et al. Utility of telemedicine in sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic. A rapid review. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2021;3(5):843–853. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.297
  4. Dodoo JE, Al-Samarraie H, Alzahrani AI. Telemedicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: Barriers and policy recommendations for Covid-19 and beyond. Int J Med Inform. 2021;151:104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104467
  5. Mbunge E, Muchemwa B, Batani J. Are we there yet? Unbundling the potential adoption and integration of telemedicine to improve virtual healthcare services in African health systems. Sens Int. 2022;3:100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100152
  6. Pillay L, Govender R, Pillay S. Doctor-perceived-barriers to telephone clinics at KwaZulu-Natal hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. S Afr Fam Pract. 2021;63(1):e1–e6. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5334
  7. David NJ, Brey Z, Ismail M. Telemedicine in the Western Cape Department of Health during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic: Leveraging data to save lives by activating a telemedicine response. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021;13(1):e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2954
  8. Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, et al. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens Int. 2021;2:100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117
  9. Statista. South Africa: Share of medical aid scheme members, by population group [homepage on the Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1115752/share-of-medical-aid-scheme-members-in-south-africa-by-population-group/
  10. Statistics South Africa. Public healthcare: How much per person? [homepage on the Internet]. Statistics South Africa. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=10548
  11. Statista. South Africa mobile internet users 2026 [homepage on the Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/558867/number-of-mobile-internet-user-in-south-africa/
  12. Statista. Smartphone users in South Africa 2014-2023 [homepage on the Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/488376/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-south-africa/
  13. Video consultations: A guide for practice – Br J Gen Pract Life [homepage on the Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 15]. Available from: https://bjgplife.com/video-consultations-guide-for-practice/
  14. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners – Telehealth [homepage on the Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.racgp.org.au/clinical-resources/covid-19-resources/telehealth
  15. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners – Guide to providing telephone and video consultations in general practice [homepage on the Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 24]. Available from: https://www.racgp.org.au/clinical-resources/covid-19-resources/telehealth/guide-to-provide-phone-and-video-consultation
  16. Digital – COVID-19 guidance for clinicians [homepage on the Internet]. Royal College of Psychiatrists. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/about-us/responding-to-covid-19/responding-to-covid-19-guidance-for-clinicians/digital-covid-19-guidance-for-clinicians
  17. Deventer CV, Mash B. African primary care research: Quality improvement cycles. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014;6(1):7. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.598
  18. Instopp. HPCSA booklets [homepage on the Internet]. 2014 [cited 2022 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.instopp.co.za/hpcsa-booklets
  19. Protection of Personal Information Act (POPI Act) [homepage on the Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Mar 10]. Available from: https://popia.co.za/
  20. Prism from Medical Protection Society [homepage on the Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 10]. Available from: https://prism.medicalprotection.org/login/index.php
  21. Hashim MJ. Patient-centered communication: Basic skills. Am Fam Physician [serial online]. 2017;95(1):29–34. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2017/0101/p29.html
  22. Kemp EC, Floyd MR, McCord-Duncan E, et al. Patients prefer the method of ‘Tell Back- Collaborative Inquiry’ to assess understanding of medical information. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.01.070093