About the Author(s)


Matthew O. Benedict Email symbol
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Wilhelm J. Steinberg symbol
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Frederik M. Claassen symbol
Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Nathaniel Mofolo symbol
School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Citation


Benedict MO, Steinberg WJ, Claassen FM, Mofolo N. Enhancing public awareness and practice of prostate cancer screening among African men: A scoping review. S Afr Fam Pract. 2023;65(1), a5621. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5621

Original Research

Enhancing public awareness and practice of prostate cancer screening among African men: A scoping review

Matthew O. Benedict, Wilhelm J. Steinberg, Frederik M. Claassen, Nathaniel Mofolo

Received: 22 Aug. 2022; Accepted: 22 Nov. 2022; Published: 17 Jan. 2023

Copyright: © 2023. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa)-related incidence is on the increase, with black South African men presenting disproportionately with aggressive disease. Recent studies show a greater net benefit of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening of black men compared with the general population. This scoping review provides an overview of available research on strategies that have enhanced PCa screening awareness and practice in the African setting.

Methods: Relevant databases were searched to identify 2010–2021 studies. Following scoping review guidelines, data were extracted, summarised and quantitatively analysed.

Results: Of the 21 articles included, 19 were from the United States. Nine were published within the last five years and 14 were pre-test/post-test. Most articles evaluated the effect of health-promoting strategies on awareness and practice of PCa screening among black men. Community-oriented strategies enhanced awareness and practice of PCa screening. Healthcare providers and community members, including PCa survivors, participated in the strategies’ planning, development and implementation. Topics that improve PCa knowledge and clear cultural misconceptions were addressed, targeting public spaces unique to these men. Prostate cancer health education methods were diverse, comprehensive, user friendly and culturally sensitive.

Conclusion: More research on strategies to enhance PCa screening awareness and practice among African men is needed, as this is scarce. Strategies enhancing PCa screening awareness and practice among African men are community oriented and entail health education methods, topics, presenters and venues. These strategies can be adopted in the South African setting.

Contribution: This study recommends strategies to enhance the awareness and practice of PCa screening among African men.

Keywords: prostate cancer; screening; knowledge; awareness; health education; African men.

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and ranks the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy (after lung cancer) in men worldwide.1 Evidence shows higher mortality rates from PCa among black African populations than other races. This disproportionate mode of presentation has also been described between regions in Africa. For example, reports show lower PCa incidence and mortality rates of 10.6 and 7.0 per 100 000 men in northern Africa, compared with the average rates of 34.3 and 22.1 per 100 000 men observed in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Factors attributable to these variations include poor socioeconomic status, dietary differences, genetic differences and the presence of infectious diseases in SSA.2 Other socioeconomic and health systems factors attributable to the variance in PCa presentation include the absence of low-cost, community-based screening and health promotion programmes, late presentation of patients to healthcare facilities, fewer treatment options, lack of adequate follow-up and inherent social norms and beliefs.3 Reasons for the late presentation of men, often with advanced disease, include low health literacy and the cultural concept of the disease, masculinity and disease, poor help-seeking behaviour and failure to take the sick role.4 Despite the racial disproportion in the morbidity and mortality from PCa, black men are underrepresented in diagnostic and therapeutic clinical trials on this disease.2

The incidence of PCa in South Africa is on the upward trend: 29.4 per 100 000 men in 2007 and 67.9 per 100 000 men in 2012.5 In South Africa, PCa has the highest frequency of all new cancer cases, with 3896 deaths occurring of the 13 152 new patients (29.6%).6 Compared with men of other races, South African black men present with higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and higher stage and grade of disease, with the majority of the cases being incurable. Also, compared with African American men, South African black men had a higher prevalence of aggressive disease and higher PSA levels, especially those from rural communities.7

Delayed diagnosis has been identified as a likely cause for patients presenting with advanced disease. The mean age of black patients at presentation in two South African studies (KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape) was 71.6 and 68.9 years, respectively.5 This was higher than the mean age of 64.7 years in black patients in the United States Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Reasons identified for delayed diagnosis among the patients in a South African study5 were a lack of PCa screening programme and a referral population that is primarily rural, with poor socioeconomic status, high unemployment rates, and low literacy and education levels. Another contributing factor may be adherence to a strong traditional belief system, with patients preferring to visit traditional healers rather than a clinic or hospital.5 Many obstacles to accessing health services exist in poor rural communities, resulting in lost-to-follow-up.5

A study was performed in the Free State to determine the profile and risk stratification of patients with PCa treated at the Department of Oncology, Universitas Annex in Bloemfontein.8 The majority (72.8%) of the patients were of the black race, 43.7% had high-grade disease (i.e. Gleason score 8–10), 67.9% had PSA levels > 20 ng/mL and 62.3% had T stage ≥ T3. Nearly half the patients (48.7%) had stage IV disease, and 38.4% received palliative hormonal therapy as initial treatment. The majority of the patients (82.5%) fell into the high-risk group.

Prostate cancer screening

Prostate cancer screening is an attempt to diagnose PCa in asymptomatic men through digital rectal examination (DRE) and the measurement of serum PSA. Despite the inconclusive benefits of using DRE and PSA as screening tests, large population-based studies showed increased survival benefits in the early treatment of PCa compared with no active therapy in men with moderately and poorly differentiated disease.9

The United States Preventive Task Force (USPSTF) has reported a potential benefit of decreasing deaths from PCa in men aged 55–69 years with PSA screening. However, the benefit of screening is doubtful for men above 70 years of age.10,11,12 The relatively higher mortality from PCa observed in Africa has been partly attributed to the limited availability of screening and early detection.13 Although PCa screening remains controversial – it is currently a method recognised to control PCa disease through early detection.14

According to the American Cancer Society, there is evidence that PSA screening can detect early-stage PCa, and it is recommended that men at high risk, based on race and family history, should begin early detection with a PSA blood test and DRE at 45 years of age. Men at higher risk (having more than one first-degree relative who had cancer at an early stage) should start early detection at 40 years of age.15

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment are the major challenges associated with PSA screening. A diagnosis of PCa usually calls for treatment, and all PCa treatments carry a considerable risk of side effects such as sexual and urinary dysfunction. In as much as diagnosing aggressive cancers can be lifesaving, diagnosing harmless cancers does more harm than good.16 A recent European study on the harm to benefit of PCa screening in black men showed that although the potential for overdiagnosis and overtreatment remains, the net benefit of PSA screening is greater for black men than the general population. Therefore, policymakers may need to consider the need for race-specific screening guidelines.2

In South Africa, PCa screening is equally common across all race groups. South African guidelines17 recommend that PCa screening be performed in all men from 45 years onwards and in the absence of identifiable risk factors, from 40 years in black African males, where there is a family history of PCa and other identifiable risk factors. In South Africa, PCa screening involves both DRE and PSA.17 The recommended guidelines notwithstanding, the uptake of PCa screening is low among African men, which raises a suspicion of patterns in knowledge and beliefs towards PCa screening within a subculture.15 The higher mortality from PCa observed among African men may be a consequence of their screening behaviour.

In as much as it might be financially challenging to screen the entire population for PCa, once a patient deemed to belong in the high-risk category attends a doctor with a complaint (the nature notwithstanding), a simple screening process can be incorporated into the consultation with little extra time or effort.18 As stated by Glynn:18

In health economic terms, a true screening programme for a particular disease across a whole population has to be evaluated as being useful, economic and with no negative effects. (p. 8)

To address the quadruple burden of disease in South Africa, the focus has been on maternal and child (health) care, HIV and pulmonary tuberculosis, trauma and non-communicable diseases.19 Under-representation of male-related diseases within the healthcare systems and the media has been observed. Even though South Africa has national registries for breast and cervical cancers, none exists for PCa.20 There seems to be a lack of prioritisation and limited secondary prevention strategies geared towards PCa disease.

Arguments for an enhanced public awareness of prostate cancer screening

Studies have identified the lack of knowledge on PCa among African men.21,22 In fact, most South African indigenous languages do not have translations for the term ‘prostate gland’. The racial difference in stage at presentation and therapy shows the need for greater PCa awareness and education among patients and primary healthcare practitioners. Early detection of PCa through more widespread PSA screening may be of value among this identified vulnerable group of men.21,23

Among men with some degree of PCa knowledge, there is still a low turn up for screening for this disease. A Kenyan study13 showed that the screening rate is still low despite massive education campaigns on PCa awareness in Kenya. Apart from knowledge gaps, certain cultural and belief factors were responsible for the low turn up for PCa screening.13

An Asian study24 showed that health promotion plans and educational intervention programmes provided by healthcare practitioners would increase awareness and correct false impressions about PCa, ultimately stimulating screening among men. Education programmes should be designed to identify and correct public misrepresentations for individuals to recognise health concerns and gain more knowledge. The study further showed that educational videos were significantly effective in motivating and educating participants about their beliefs on PSA screening for early detection of PCa.24

Locally in South Africa, arguments exist for enhanced health awareness through community participation. The Patients’ Rights Charter of South Africa25 is a charter of the National Department of Health that promotes and protects patients’ rights in the healthcare sector. This charter affords patients the right to participate in healthcare decision-making, access healthcare, confidentiality and privacy, informed consent, refuse treatment and the continuity of care.25 The South African ‘Batho Pele Principles’26 serve as an acceptable policy and legislative framework regarding service delivery in the public service. These principles align with the constitutional ideals of providing service impartially, utilising resources efficiently and effectively and responding to people’s needs through participation. One of the prime aims of Batho Pele is to provide a framework geared at increasing access to healthcare information and services to the many South Africans who do not have such access.26

Hence, studies have shown gaps in the awareness and practice of black men regarding PCa screening; however, there is a paucity of studies on the specific strategies to close these identified gaps among this vulnerable group of men.

The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the available research on strategies proven to have enhanced PCa screening awareness and practice in the African setting. The following research question was formulated: What health-promoting strategies have been shown to improve African men’s awareness and practice of PCa screening?

Methods

Study design

This was a scoping review; the details of the conduct are described next.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The conduct of this review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses – Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)27 and Joanna Brigg’s Institute guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.28 To be included in the review, articles needed to: (1) be about humans (of African descent), (2) have been conducted in an African setting, (3) be in English, (4) be related to focus on PCa health-promoting strategies and (5) have been published during the past 11 years (up to and including 2021). No limits were placed on the type of article.

Search strategy

To identify potentially relevant documents, the following search terms were used to search for the evidence:

  • ‘primary health*’ and (Knowledge or attitude* or practice*) and (Screen* or psa or antigen* or ‘rectal* exam*’ or ‘physical* exam*’ or ‘early diagnos*’) and ‘Prostate cancer’ and (‘African men’ or ‘black men’)
  • (Screen* or psa or antigen* or ‘rectal* exam*’ or ‘physical* exam*’ or ‘early diagnos*’) and ‘Prostate cancer’ and (‘African men’ or ‘black men’) and ti (african* or black*)
  • ((educat* or Teach* or learn* or train* or inform*) n3 (tool* or method* or interven*)) and ‘prostate cancer’ and (Screen* or psa or antigen* or ‘rectal* exam*’ or ‘physical* exam*’ or ‘early diagnos*’) and (kap or knowledge or attitude* or practice*)
  • ((educat* or Teach* or learn* or train*) and (black* or african*) and ‘prostate cancer’ and (Screen* or psa or antigen* or ‘rectal* exam*’ or ‘physical* exam*’ or ‘early diagnos*’)) not ‘african american’

Searches were conducted in the following databases from 2010 to 2021: Academic Search Ultimate, Africa-Wide Information, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL with Full Text, Communication & Mass Media Complete, ERIC, Health Source – Consumer Edition, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Humanities Source Ultimate, MEDLINE, Sociology Source Ultimate, MasterFILE Premier. The first searches were conducted on 14 August 2020 while the last ones were conducted on 31 August 2021. The search strategy was conducted by the principal researcher with the assistance of a senior university librarian.

Screening and selection of articles

Each researcher screened the titles and abstracts to exclude studies that fell short of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The researchers sent their selected studies to the principal researcher, who excluded duplications and combined the studies into a single list. This list was sent to the librarian who obtained the full-text articles. Full-text articles that fell short of the inclusion and exclusion criteria were excluded.

Data synthesis

The researchers extracted data using a standardised template (data charting form) developed by two of the researchers. The template included the first author, year of publication, country of origin, publication type, study design, aim of the study, strategies engaged and key findings. Each researcher submitted the completed templates to the principal researcher, who integrated them into one document. As this was a scoping review, no critical appraisal of the quality of the included articles was performed.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSREC) of the University of the Free State (ref. no. UFS-HSD2020/1481/2411). Permission to conduct the study was granted by the Head of the Free State Department of Health.

Results

The search strategies yielded 1045 publications. Following deduplication (300 duplicates removed), 745 publications were left. After screening by title and abstract, 659 publications were neither specific in terms of population nor context. The full texts of the remaining 86 articles were assessed for eligibility. Sixty-five full-text articles were further found irrelevant; 28 were mixed race studies, while 37 had concepts unrelated to health-promoting strategies, leaving 21 articles in the review. Figure 1 is a flow diagram of article selection.

FIGURE 1: Flow diagram of article selection.

Characteristics of the included articles

A total of 21 published articles were included in the review, the majority (90.5%) of which were from the United States (Table 1). About a third were published within the last five years. Two-thirds (n = 14) of the articles were pre-test/post-test in nature. All but one (PhD thesis) of the included articles were original research. Most articles aimed to evaluate the effect of certain health-promoting strategies on the awareness and practice of PCa screening among black males.

TABLE 1: Studies included in the scoping review.
TABLE 1 (Continues...): Studies included in the scoping review.
TABLE 1 (Continues...): Studies included in the scoping review.
Strategies engaged and assessed in the studies

As shown in Table 2, the strategies engaged in the studies reviewed were classified under the following themes: (1) methods of health education, (2) health education topics, (3) presenters of the health education and (4) venue of the health education.

TABLE 2: Strategies engaged to enhance prostate cancer awareness and practice.

Prostate cancer health education programmes were targeted primarily at rural community members. African American men (and their partners/relatives) were recruited for a PCa education programme using flyers, radio and newspaper advertisements, professional listservs and word of mouth.33,34

Both healthcare professionals and lay members of the communities were involved in the planning, development and implementation of the intervention.29 These health education interventions were mostly culturally targeted and faith based.34,35,43,49 The venues used, as found by this review, were churches,29,30,38,40,47 barbershops,32,35,40,41,42 community health centres (CHCs),30 rural community29 and other civic and social organisations.37,38

Motivational talks were delivered through live and video-clip testimonies of black survivors of PCa.29,32,40,42,46,47

Barbers were trained using a combination of didactic instruction, interactive group exercises and team building. Subsequently, they served as PCa health instructors to their male clients.41,42

Other community members involved in delivering motivational talks and health education comprised men and women who were church lay leaders and pastors,47 lay health advisors,30 trained lay community educators,33 PCa advocates, radio personality, barbers, a former legislator, a minister,32 registered dietitian, physical activity experts and others interested in the health of their community.34

The various methods of instruction engaged by these lay community members included educational pamphlets,31 flipcharts,42 culturally relevant media (e.g. pictures),43 educational brochures,42 tailored telephone education31 and internet-enabled mobile tablet technology.48

Live teachings were given to men in the community by physicians,29 PCa scientists and urologists,32 university researchers and other relevant clinicians.34 These teachings covered PCa statistics such as incidence, mortality and survival rates.29,47 Other aspects of PCa covered were basic anatomy and physiology of the prostate gland, easy description of its location in a man’s body, description of PCa and how it spreads, risk factors, signs and symptoms,37 prevention strategies,47 early detection29,38 and a description of all possible PCa screening methods,37 benefits versus risks of PSA testing,47 informed decision-making (IDM) for PCa screening,30 treatment options47 and quality of life.29

Health education methods engaged by these healthcare providers included PowerPoint presentations,30,37,43,47,49 focus groups (including female participants)33,36,38,40,44 and educational workshops36,39 conducted in the form of didactic and interactive discussions, stories and testimonies.

Focus groups and interviews were conducted among community stakeholders such as cancer survivors, oncologists, cancer researchers and community health workers to identify barriers to black men participating in PCa educational workshops and other issues related to prostate health.13

Outcome of the strategies

The effect of the various interventions is listed in Table 3.

TABLE 3: Outcome of the strategies.

Overall, PCa knowledge improved in 13 (61.9%) studies.29,30,31,32,33,34,35,37,38,39,40,42,47,48,49 There was an increase in the knowledge of informed and shared decision-making (SDM); the intention to have SDM with healthcare providers,29,36,42,47 while its actual practice also increased.29,31 Multiple interventions (workshops) resulted in better IDM outcomes.39 Both PCa knowledge and self-efficacy for IDM improved with the combined intervention compared with the standard education video alone.40 Community outreach using culturally sensitive educational materials was shown to be effective.30 In one of the studies, the mean knowledge score increased in 12 of the 19 knowledge items.34

There was an improvement in knowledge of the personal risk for PCa and the benefits of PCa screening, with a consequent decrease in PCa testing decision conflict/decisional uncertainty.30,31,47 There were positive changes in behavioural efficacy as well as a decrease in barriers to screening.36,49

Ultimately, both the intention to have a PCa screening and the actual PSA screening rate increased in seven studies.32,33,35,37,38,43,47 For instance, the percentage of men willing to get a PSA test within the next 12 months increased from 57% to 73% in one of the studies.35 However, there were contrary findings in two studies: one showed no effect on the intentions to get a PCa test,31 while the other showed no changes in perceived subjective norms and perceived benefits of PCa screening.49

Barbers were able to complete a training curriculum on PCa and gain sufficient knowledge to become barber health advisors.41 There was an increase in self-reported knowledge of PCa among barbershop clients; rural barbershops were both appropriate and feasible settings for PCa health promotion.42

Regarding the role of women in prostate health, the involvement of trained female lay health advisors was perceived to be effective in helping men obtain prostate care. Also, women seem to play an important role in supporting male participation in PCa screening.30,38,44 However, one study showed no change in IDM outcome, despite the involvement of female health partners.39

Conclusions from the focus group discussions include the following:

  • Involvement of community members in health education and awareness campaign is vital33,40,44
  • Print, electronic, social and billboards are important media for PCa health promotion44
  • Women can make a significant contribution towards reducing PCa mortality among men by being educators and an information resource, ensuring healthier living, facilitating regular primary care and generally being supportive44
  • Technologies should be considered for use in the widespread dissemination of PCa information and preparing men for making informed PCa screening decisions with their doctor45
  • Video intervention is suitable for use with men with different health literacy characteristics.32,46

Discussion

More than 90% of studies included in this review were conducted among African Americans in the United States, despite efforts in the search strategies to identify other non-American studies among African men, thus indicating a paucity of research on this subject among black men of African nationalities.

One of the key findings from this review was that both healthcare professionals and lay members of the communities were involved in the planning, development and implementation of the intervention. This aligns with primary healthcare initiatives, which allow for the full participation of community members in implementation and decision-making.50 Social participation, an essential feature in the WHO’s Framework on Integrated, People-centred Health Services, strengthens and promotes health governance.50 Furthermore, the community-oriented primary care (COPC) cycle involves the determination and implementation of adaptive action plans to address individual, family and community health issues; this is followed by monitoring, evaluation and review of engaged activities and plans.51 Finally, community involvement in the planning, development and implementation of healthcare intervention will ensure the incorporation of its cultural sensitivity, thereby enhancing its comprehension and acceptability and minimising disparity in healthcare.52,53

Similar to the findings of this review, churches, CHC and barbershops are also appropriate venues for PCa education and health promotion among men in South Africa. In addition, venues applicable to the South African context in the target of men for PCa health promotion include taxi ranks, physical activity/wellness centres (e.g. gym) and social gatherings, for example, barbecues. Subsequently, the owners and those in charge of these various establishments can be trained to become health education providers. In South Africa, community health workers are a vital cadre of healthcare providers conveying healthcare education and services directly to households in the community. Also, because of accessibility and affordability, up to 80% of South Africans consult traditional and spiritual healers for their primary healthcare needs.54 Proper training of these healthcare providers on this subject will enhance the dissemination of health education and a rational approach to PCa screening in the community. As found by this review, other community-based and academic institutional health promoters also apply to the South African context.

Globally, social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, Twitter and WhatsApp have become effective mediums of communication with the populace.55 The use of social media platforms has been shown to positively influence awareness of public health behavioural changes, as seen in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.56 Its use in disseminating health education is not without limitations and disadvantages; misleading information can also be easily circulated. Other limitations to the use of social media include inequality, the digital divide, language barriers, gender gaps, privacy concerns, age, cultural beliefs and disability.55 In South Africa, MomConnect, a mobile health programme initiated by the National Department of Health targeted at improving antenatal and maternal health, is one of the largest mobile health initiatives in the world. It is effective in the widespread dissemination of relevant health education to over half a million users. Such information includes nutrition, diet, drug use, warning signs for medical issues, foetal development, postnatal care and social support.57 Its helpdesk feature allows registered users to ask maternal and child health-related questions and provide feedback on health services received at public health clinics.58 Similar mobile health programmes can be developed to promote PCa-related health education among relevant men.

With the controversies surrounding PCa screening, SDM has become a crucial subject to be considered during community health education and awareness. The competence of healthcare providers in the practice of SDM is equally important. As shown in Table 2 and Table 3, SDM was one of the PCa health education topics presented to men in the community. Consequently, the knowledge, intention and practice of SDM improved. There was also a decrease in PCa testing decision conflict.

Effective health education may pose greater challenges in regions with low knowledge and literacy levels; for instance, most indigenous languages in South Africa do not have a translation for the prostate gland. Health education topics such as anatomy (location of the prostate gland) and physiology of the prostate are therefore critical in this setting. Also, interpretation and translation of health education into the common indigenous languages are essential.

Study’s strengths and limitations

As far as we know, this seems to be one of the few studies focused on strategies that have enhanced PCa screening awareness and practice, particularly in the African setting. Strategies identified by this study may also be adapted to promote awareness and practices related to other common cancers in the study setting.

However, the following limitations relate to the study and should be borne in mind: Only studies conducted among men of African origin were included; therefore, relevant strategies promoting awareness and practice of PCa screening among other races might have been missed. Also, only articles written in English were included; relevant articles from different languages might also have been missed. Most of the studies in this review were of a pre-test and post-test study design; the positive impact revealed cannot be guaranteed in the long term as the post-tests were carried out within 6–12 months of the intervention. There is, therefore, the need for the continuity of these health-promoting strategies. Finally, attempts to find and include relevant grey literature were to no avail. Hence, only peer-reviewed articles from academic journals were included in this report.

Recommendations

  • More research on this subject should be encouraged, as they are scarce in the African settings.
  • Strategies shown to have enhanced the awareness of PCa screening are community oriented, thus necessitating the involvement of healthcare providers, community members and PCa survivors in the planning, development and implementation of applicable strategies.
  • Topics that improve knowledge and clear cultural misconceptions regarding PCa should be addressed, bearing in mind the public spaces unique to these men.
  • Prostate cancer health education methods should be diverse, comprehensive, user friendly and culturally sensitive, with the availability of translations into the local languages.
  • Similar strategies can be considered in the South African setting, bearing in mind the needful socio-cultural adaptations.
  • The government and relevant parastatals should mandate and support family physicians, who are the most senior clinicians in primary healthcare settings, to champion these health promotion strategies.

Conclusion

This scoping review sought available research on strategies that have enhanced PCa screening awareness and practice in the African setting. More research on this subject is needed as they are scarce. Strategies enhancing PCa screening awareness and practice among African men are community-oriented and entail considering relevant health education methods, topics, presenters and venues. These strategies can be adopted in the South African setting.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs Annamarie du Preez, the librarian, Frik Scott Medical Library, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, for her support during the course of this review.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Authors’ contributions

M.O.B. conceptualised the study with inputs from W.J.S., F.M.C. and N.M. All authors participated in the search strategy, screening/selection of articles and data synthesis. M.O.B. drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript, gave critical input and approved the final version.

Funding information

The study was conducted with financial assistance from the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, through the Three Schools of Medicine Research and Postgraduate Committee. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Data availability

The scoping review lists all included studies in the manuscript with their references.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of any affiliated agency of the authors.

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest global cancer data: Cancer burden rise to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018 [press release]. World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 21]. Available from: https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/pr263_E.pdf
  2. Basourakos SP, Gulati R, Vince RA Jr, et al. Harm-to-benefit of three decades of prostate cancer screening in Black men. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(6):10.1056/evidoa2200031. https://doi.org/10.1056/evidoa2200031
  3. Adeloye D, David RA, Aderemi AV, et al. An estimate of the incidence of prostate cancer in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153496. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153496
  4. Machirori M, Patch C, Metcalfe A, Kay N (reviewing editor). Study of the relationship between Black men, culture and prostate cancer beliefs. Cogent Med. 2018;5(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1442636
  5. Le Roux HA, Urry RJ, Sartorius B, Aldous C. Prostate cancer at a regional hospital in South Africa: We are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. S Afr J Surg. 2015;53(3 and 4):57–62.
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2020: South Africa [homepage on the Internet]. World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2022 May 05]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/710-south-africa-fact-sheets.pdf
  7. Tindall EA, Monare LR, Petersen DC, et al. Clinical presentation of prostate cancer in black South Africans. Prostate. 2014;74(8):880–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.22806
  8. Sherriff A, Da Costa N, Engelbrecht A, Li A, Prince N, Joubert G. Prostate cancer profile and risk stratification of patients treated at Universitas Annex Department of Oncology, Bloemfontein, Free State, during 2008 to 2010. S Afr Fam Pract. 2015;57(4):247–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2014.993859
  9. Nakandi H, Kirabo M, Semugabo C, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Ugandan men regarding prostate cancer. Afr J Urol. 2013;19(4):165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2013.08.001
  10. Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63–89. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1191
  11. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Grade definitions [homepage on the Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 Oct 05]. Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/grade-definitions
  12. US Preventive Services Task Force, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for prostate Cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement [published correction appears in JAMA. 2018;319(23):2443]. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1901–1913. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.3710
  13. Mutua K, Pertet AM, Otieno C. Cultural factors associated with the intent to be screened for prostate cancer among adult men in a rural Kenyan community. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):894. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4897-0
  14. Cuzick J, Thorat MA, Andriole G, et al. Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):e484–e492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70211-6
  15. Kinyao M, Kishoyian G. Attitude, perceived risk and intention to screen for prostate cancer by adult men in Kasikeu Sub Location, Makueni County, Kenya. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2018;8:125–132.
  16. Harvard Health Publishing. PSA: Prostate-specific antigen, persisting scientific ambiguities [homepage on the Internet]. Harvard Medical School; 2009 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. Available from: https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/PSA-Prostate-Specific-Antigen-Persisting-Scientific-Ambiguities
  17. Segone AM, Haffejee M, Wentzel S, et al. Prostate cancer diagnostic and treatment guidelines [homepage on the Internet]. Reviewed, adapted and updated by the Prostate Cancer Foundation of South Africa; 2013 [cited 2019 Oct 03] Available from: http://prostate.acitravel.co.za/cake/app/webroot/uploads/files/Prostate_Cancer_Guidelines_2013.pdf
  18. Glynn M. Doctor and patient: General principles of history taking. In: Glynn M, Drake WM, editors. Hutchison’s clinical methods. An integrated approach to clinical practice. 23rd ed. London: Saunders Elsevier, 2012; p. 3–14.
  19. Scott V, Schaay N, Schneider H, Sanders D. Addressing social determinants of health in South Africa: The journey continues. S Afr Health Rev. 2017;2017(1):77–87.
  20. Hayes VM, Bornman MSR. Prostate cancer in Southern Africa: Does Africa hold untapped potential to add value to the current understanding of a common disease?. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.008862
  21. Mofolo N, Betshu O, Kenna O, et al. Knowledge of prostate cancer among males attending a urology clinic, a South African study. Springerplus. 2015;4:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0824-y
  22. Bugoye FC, Leyna GH, Moen K, Mmbaga EJ. Knowledge, perceived risk and utilization of prostate cancer screening services among men in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Prostate Cancer. 2019;2019:2463048. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2463048
  23. Heyns CF, Fisher M, Lecuona A, Van der Merwe A. Prostate cancer among different racial groups in the Western Cape: Presenting features and management. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(4):267–270. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.4420
  24. Saleh AM, Fooladi MM, Petro-Nustas W, Dweik G, Abuadas MH. Enhancing knowledge, beliefs, and intention to screen for prostate cancer via different health educational interventions: A literature review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(16):7011–7023. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.16.7011
  25. National Department of Health. The patients’ rights charter [homepage on the Internet]. Republic of South Africa; 1999 [cited 2019 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.idealhealthfacility.org.za/App/Document/Download/150
  26. Health Professions Council of South Africa. Batho Pele Principles (Annexure G) [homepage on the Internet]. 1997 [cited 2022 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.hpcsa-blogs.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2017-IN-Handbook-Annexure-G.pdf
  27. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  28. Peters MD, Marnie C, Colquhoun H, et al. Scoping reviews: Reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Syst Rev. 2021;10:263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3
  29. Howard A, Morgan P, Fogel J, et al. A community/faith-based education program to increase knowledge and shared decision making behavior for prostate cancer screening among Black men. ABNF J. 2018;29(3):61–68.
  30. Hunter JC, Vines AI, Carlisle V. African Americans’ perceptions of prostate-specific antigen prostate cancer screening. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(4):539–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114566453
  31. Lepore SJ, Wolf RL, Basch CE, et al. Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2012;44(3):320–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9392-3
  32. Odedina F, Oluwayemisi AO, Pressey S, et al. Development and assessment of an evidence-based prostate cancer intervention programme for black men: The W.O.R.D. on prostate cancer video. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014;8:460. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.460
  33. Patel K, Ukoli F, Liu J, et al. A community-driven intervention for prostate cancer screening in African Americans. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111431275
  34. Troy C, Brunson A, Goldsmith A, et al. Implementing community-based prostate cancer education in rural South Carolina: A collaborative approach through a statewide cancer alliance. J Cancer Educ. 2022;37(1):163–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01800-7
  35. Frencher SK Jr, Sharma AK, Teklehaimanot S, et al. PEP talk: Prostate education program, ‘Cutting through the uncertainty of prostate cancer for Black men using decision support instruments in barbershops’. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(3):506–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0871-7
  36. Livingston JN, Porter AG, Bell-Hughes KV, Brandon DT. Prostate cancer in southern Black men: The role of historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). Negro Educ Rev. 2018;69(1–4):124–143.
  37. Capanna C, Chujutalli R, Murray S, Lwin K, Aung M, Jolly P. Prostate cancer educational intervention among men in western Jamaica. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:788–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.008
  38. Carter VL, Tippett F, Anderson DL, Tameru B. Increasing prostate cancer screening among African American men. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21(3 Suppl):91–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0366
  39. Holt CL, Le D, Slade JL, et al. Can women facilitate men’s prostate cancer screening informed decision-making? The M-PACT Trial. J Health Commun. 2017;22(12):964–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1382616
  40. Jones-Dendy DJ. African American men’s prostate cancer knowledge and self-efficacy for informed decision-making: A mixed methods study [PhD thesis]. Tyler, TX: The University of Texas at Tyler, School of Nursing at Scholar Works; 2017.
  41. Luque JS, Roy S, Tarasenko YN, Ross L, Johnson J, Gwede CK. Feasibility study of engaging barbershops for prostate cancer education in rural African-American communities. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(4):623–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0739-2
  42. Luque JS, Rivers BM, Gwede CK, Kambon M, Green BL, Meade CD. Barbershop communications on prostate cancer screening using barber health advisers. Am J Mens Health. 2011;5(2):129–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988310365167
  43. McCree-Hale R, Hale TM, Rutley KR, Aung M, Jolly PE. Evaluating a theory-based health education intervention to improve awareness of prostate cancer among men in Western Jamaica. West Indian Med J. 2012;61(6):580–586.
  44. Okoro ON, Rutherford CA, Witherspoon SF. Leveraging the family influence of women in prostate cancer efforts targeting African American men. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018;5(4):820–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0427-0
  45. Owens OL, Friedman DB, Brandt HM, Bernhardt JM, Hébert JR. Digital solutions for informed decision making: An academic-community partnership for the development of a prostate cancer decision aid for African American men. Am J Mens Health. 2016;10(3):207–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988314564178
  46. Ross L, Ashford AD, Bleechington SJ, Dark T, Erwin DO. Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010;102(3):228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30529-0
  47. Sandiford L, D’Errico EM. Facilitating shared decision making about prostate cancer screening among African American men. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016;43(1):86–92. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.ONF.86-92
  48. Sultan DH, Rivers BM, Osongo BO, et al. Affecting African American men’s prostate cancer screening decision-making through a mobile tablet-mediated intervention. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014;25(3):1262–1277. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2014.0148
  49. Wray RJ, Vijaykumar S, Jupka K, Zellin S, Shahid M. Addressing the challenge of informed decision making in prostate cancer community outreach to African American men. Am J Mens Health. 2011;5(6):508–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988311411909
  50. Haricharan HJ, Stuttaford M, London L. The role of community participation in primary health care: practices of South African health committees. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021;22:e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146342362100027X
  51. Mash B. Oxford handbook of family medicine. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  52. Knoerl AM, Esper KW, Hasenau SM. Cultural sensitivity in patient health education. Nurs Clin North Am. 2011;46(3):335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2011.05.008
  53. Brooks LA, Manias E, Bloomer MJ. Culturally sensitive communication in healthcare: A concept analysis. Collegian. 2019;26(3):383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.09.007
  54. Molebatsi J, Breed C, Stafford GI. Traditional healing in South Africa needs spaces designed for the purpose. The Conversation [newspaper online]. 2020 November 10 [cited 2022 March 22]. Available from: https://theconversation.com/traditional-healing-in-south-africa-needs-spaces-designed-for-the-purpose-148473
  55. Kubheka BZ, Carter V, Mwaura J. Social media health promotion in South Africa: Opportunities and challenges. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2389
  56. Al-Dmour H, Masa’deh R, Salman A, Abuhashesh M, Al-Dmour R. Influence of social media platforms on public health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic via the mediating effects of public health awareness and behavioral changes: Integrated model. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e19996. https://doi.org/10.2196/19996
  57. Jahan R, Zou P, Huang Y, Jibb L. Impact of MomConnect program in South Africa: A narrative review. Online J Nurs Inform [serial online]. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.himss.org/resources/impact-momconnect-program-south-africa-narrative-review
  58. Xiong K, Kamunyori J, Sebidi J. The MomConnect helpdesk: How an interactive mobile messaging programme is used by mothers in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 2):e000578. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000578