IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-S) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 ■-1^ 12.5 
 
 ^ ^ IIIM 
 
 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 V] 
 
 % 
 
 A 
 
 /J 
 
 ''^^ o^ 
 
 <r ^ <=# ^-^ 
 
 V 
 
 7 
 
 # 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST H.h,m STRffT 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. M&oC 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 :w 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/iC^H 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques at bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 □ Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagee 
 
 n Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur^e et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 n 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a it6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger una 
 modification dans la mdthode normale de filmage 
 sont indiqu^s ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 Thai 
 toth 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommag^es 
 
 D 
 
 / 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicul6es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d^color^es, tachetdes ou piqu^es 
 
 The i 
 
 post 
 
 ofth 
 
 filmi 
 
 Orig 
 
 begi 
 
 thai 
 
 ■ion 
 
 otha 
 
 first 
 
 sion 
 
 or ill 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured init (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noirel 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Relid avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank loaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmdes. 
 
 D 
 
 y 
 
 □ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of print varies/ 
 Quality in^gale de I'lmpression 
 
 Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 □ Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 The 
 shall 
 TINl 
 whi< 
 
 Map 
 difff 
 ontii 
 begi 
 right 
 raqu 
 metl 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6X6 filmdes 6 nouveau de faqon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 D 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires; 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce documunt est filmd au taux de reduction indiqud ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X V6X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
ails 
 
 du 
 
 tdifier 
 
 une 
 
 nage 
 
 Tha copy filmad h«r« has baan raproducad thanks 
 to tha ganarosity of: 
 
 Library Division 
 
 Provincial Archives of British Columbia 
 
 Tha linagas appaaring hara ara tha bast quality 
 possibia considaring tha condition and laglbility 
 of tha original copy and in Itaaping with tha 
 filming contract spacifications. 
 
 L'axamplaira film* fut raproduit grica A la 
 gtnArosIti da: 
 
 Library Division 
 
 Provincial Archives of British Columbia 
 
 Las Imagas suivantas ont At* raproduitas avac la 
 plus grand soin. compta tanu da la condition at 
 da la nattat* da l'axamplaira film*, at un 
 conformit* avac las conditions du contrat da 
 filmaga. 
 
 Original copias in printad papar covars ara filmed 
 beginning with tha front sovar and ending on 
 tha last page with a printad or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the bacit cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol •^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "). or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les exemplairas originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprim*e sont film*s en commenpant 
 par la premier plat at an terminant soit par la 
 darni*re page qui comporta une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par la second 
 plat, salon la cas. Tous les autras exemplairas 
 originaux sont film*s en commen^ant par la 
 premi*re page qui comporta une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration at en terminant par 
 la derni*re page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 darni*re image de chaque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent *tre 
 film*s * des taux de r*duction diff*rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour *tra 
 reproduit en un seul clich*, il est film* * partir 
 de Tangle sup*rieur gauche, de gauche * droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images n*cessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la m*thode. 
 
 rrata 
 :o 
 
 pelure. 
 
 D 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
^f 
 
 H 
 
 IJ 
 
SPEECH 
 
 or 
 
 HON. E. S. DARCtAN, OF ALABAMA, 
 
 OK 
 
 THE OREGON QUESTION. 
 
 DELIVERED 
 
 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESi"NTATIVES, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1846. 
 
 i 
 
 WASHINGTON: 
 
 BLAIR & RIVES, PRINTERS. 
 
 1846. 
 

THE OREGON QUESTION. 
 
 ? 
 
 The Resolution from xhe Oommittee on Foreifjn 
 Affairs, requiring the President to notify Urtiit 
 Britain of the intention of tlie United States to 
 terminate the joint occupaney of Oreijon, and to 
 abro-jate the convention of IH'27, hcinj; under 
 consideration in Committee of the Whole — 
 
 Mr. DARGAN obtained the floor, and spoke as 
 follows; 
 
 Mr. Chairman: When I took my seat in this 
 House, it was with the resolution that my voice 
 should not he iieard in it on any question of de- 
 bate. I now depart from that co\use which I had 
 marked out for myself; but I will render no apolo- 
 gy fur it, save only, that my views on the question 
 under debate .s<;em, to me at least, to be peculiar. 
 I have listened to the debate with attention, and 
 regret that I cannot agrc<.' with those who o]iposed 
 the notice on the one hand, nor with those who 
 urge the adoption of the particular resolution now 
 under discussion. I believe a notice of some kind 
 should be given; for if we fail to give notice in some 
 form, or of some character, I will ask, what will be 
 the consequence? Sup]iose the dithculties be not 
 cettlcd i)y negotiation, and notice to determine tiie 
 convention be not given: will not the question of 
 notice become a political hobby? Will not the 
 American people be taught to believe the whole ot" 
 Oregon is ours? and that those who oppose the 
 notice are afraid to assert their rights to tliat which 
 is clearly their own? Mr. <'hairman, it would, 
 like a tornado, sweep from Maine to Louisiana, 
 crushing all opposition before it. I therefore 
 thought, from the beginning of this discussion, that 
 a notice in some shape, or in some form, ought to 
 be given. If we ful to give this notice but lor a 
 year, let the question be discussed as a political 
 one, the pulilic mind will l)e convinced that ", e 
 own the territory to 54° 40' north latitude; and 
 when so convinced, they will be roused to arms; 
 and war must decide the contest, unless England, 
 perchance, should yield up to us all we dcm-ind. 
 To avoid the evils of war is my wish, and I think 
 it is th(! wish of my constituents; but at the same 
 time neither I nor they would yield one foot of 
 territory clearly and indisputably our own. This 
 is the position occupied by the people of Alabama: 
 claim all tiiat is clearly our own; and if a contest 
 come from such an assertion of their rights, they 
 will maintain and det'end thorn; tnit by no means 
 assert title to more than belongs to us. I am not, 
 Mr. Chairman, the advocate "of the British title, 
 nor will I b«; but before this House and the Ame •- 
 iuix\ people [ will declare what are our rights; and 
 although high functionaries may say our right .s 
 
 i. 
 
 perfect to the whole territory, I will give JYiy opin- 
 ion as to their extent. And if we now will inform 
 the American people of the extent of our rights, 
 and claim nothing out that which belongs to us, the 
 question will be settled without a conflict, for 
 England will admit ti' n. 
 
 Let us claim nothing save that wliich is ours ac- 
 ci iding to the principles of justice and international 
 law. Here we can maintain our claim. The ques- 
 tion will be settled, the honor of the nation untar- 
 nished, ant] peace preserved. We are urged to pass 
 the resolution in its simple, unqualified form; but 
 connected as it must be with the positive assertion 
 of the President that the whole of Oregon is ours 
 up to 54° 40', it v/ill be an endorsement of that 
 declaration to the American people. Shall we 
 make this endorsement, or not? If we do it, what 
 will be the consequence ? It will be folly to believe 
 that anything else than war will follow. England 
 is in possession of a part of the territory; she has 
 men and arms there; she claims rights there, and 
 has rights there. And although I will not ascribe 
 to her more courage and firmness than belong to 
 the rest of the human family, I will ask gentlemen 
 to point me to that page in history where men in 
 possessicmof their rights, with arms in their hands, 
 have yielded them upon the demand of another, 
 unless this demand is based on admitted right and 
 the admitted laws of nations. No people will ever 
 do it until forced at the point of the sword. Now 
 if we wish to settle this question without difficulty, 
 without bloodshed, let us make our claim to that 
 portion of the territory which belongs to us; let us 
 admit the question as one of negotiation and settle- 
 ment. Let us, in one word, declare the line below 
 which Englantl has no right, and below which we 
 will yield her n(»ne; and my word for it, there will 
 be no war with England about Oregon. 
 
 This brings me to our title. It is said we have 
 two titles — one by discovery, and one by purchase 
 from Spain. But the title by discovery is to the 
 valley of the Columbia; and the same principles 
 that give us the valley of the Columbia, give the 
 British Government title to the country drained by 
 Piazer's river. If, therefore, the title of both Gov- 
 ernments depended on discovery, both Govern- 
 ments have rights. It is pretty well admitted on 
 all sides that if we had title by discovery only, the 
 49th degree of latitude would be the fair line of 
 separation between ua. I have heard no one an- 
 nounce, nor can it be said with reason or truth, 
 that, independent of our Spanish title, we own the 
 whole. But we invoke the aid of our Spanish title 
 to overreach the title of Great Britain by discovery 
 of Frazer's river, and her possession consequent 
 
 
I • 
 
 oil fiiirh (lisrovrry. Tier rights to tin's river and 
 the country driined \>y its wati-rs, tirf! prcrisily 
 Nudi aH w«; possesH in u-^ard to tin; (yoluniliia and 
 tin; country drained l)y it; umIinh wc can defeat her 
 right with the tith- of Spain, wiiii li we now poss<'S.s. 
 It is Nuid tliat the Kpanish title i.s ohier in point of 
 lime, as Spain firnt discovered thin territory and 
 nctutdiy took possesHion of it; and, heiii^; older, it i 
 i.s therefore superior. I may well admit that the j 
 Spanish title is ohier than the title itf (ireat Brit- 
 ain, and wo have it; hiit this .itie is siilijei t, in our ■ 
 hands, to all the conditions and uli encumbramcs 
 imposed on ''. .ly the act of Spain hefore she passed , 
 it to uh; and hefore we can override the title of ■ 
 Great Britiiin with this our Spanish title, we must ] 
 ace that Spain had imposed no conditions or encum- j 
 brances on this title. For snnpo.se the owner in 
 fee first mortf^a^e his estate am! then .sell to another i 
 in fee: the purchaser in fee titkes the estate subje(;t j 
 o the mortgage, subject to this act prior to the 
 sale in fee. Thii.s, too, we hold the title of Spain, 
 .subject to all her act.s done in relation to the title 
 before we acquired it. And this brings us to look 
 into the Nootka Sound convention of 1700. 
 
 But it is said that liie war between Great Britain 
 and Spain in 1796 annulled and abrojj^alcd this 
 treaty. This, Mr. Chairman, i.s a proposition 
 which strikes me a.s a novel ai^l remarkable (tne. 
 
 Treaties, if I understand them, may be fulfilled 
 perfectly and completely on the act of signing^ and 
 approval, or they may be (if I may be allowed the 
 definition) continuing in their character — that is, 
 to be Ailfiiled from time to time as occasion may 
 require; as, for instance, commercial treaties, whicli 
 may stipulate that certain goods shall pay certain 
 duties as they may be unported, or that a com- 
 mercial vessel shall salute a man-of-war, &.C.; or 
 they may be compounded of the two — one clause 
 may contain a perfect grant of land, another clause 
 may contain a commercial regulation. But I ask, 
 if a perfect vested right in land be conv,;ved by a 
 treaty of this compound character, if a subseciuent 
 war would divest this perfect and absolute right? 
 If so, my friend from Missouri should (renible at 
 the idea of war with France, for a declaration of 
 war would make him a French subject. I would 
 tremble at a war with Spain, for I should thereby 
 become a subject of the Span'sli crown. It is seen 
 at once that such a proposition is ab.surd. It is 
 now necessary to inquire into the JNootka Sound 
 convention; tne 3d article is as follows: 
 
 "In order to strengthen the bonds of friendship, 
 ' and preserve in future a perfect harmony and good 
 ' understanding between the two contracting par- 
 ' ties, it is agreed, that their respective subjects 
 ' .shall not be disturbed or molested, either in navi- 
 • gating or carrying on their fisheries in the Pacific ] 1 
 ' ocean or in the South seas, or in landing on the 
 ' coasts of said .seas in places not already occupied, 
 ' for the purpose of carrying on their commerce, or 
 ' of making settlements there ; the whole subject, 
 ' nevertheless, to the following restrictions speci- 
 ' fied in the three following articles," &c. 
 
 " Or of making settlemunis." Note this. 
 Permit me to ask, what has divested England of 
 this right to make settlements under this conven- 
 tion .' and why is not the Spanish title now charged 
 with this encumbrance as it was in 1790 .'' Why, I 
 ask, is it not charged with the right in England to 
 make settlements ii» luiy pait of the Oregon territory.' 
 
 In the exerci.se of this right, her citizens have 
 gdin' there and erectinl their homes. When were 
 tliey bound to depart? When they had made settle- 
 ments, (Old eonsecratf'd llit! soil as ilieir homes, with- 
 out any restriction (tr limitation as to time — on 
 what prinei|il(s of law can tliey be cinnpellcd to 
 abandon their linnies or sum niler tiies.iii' But 
 the gentleman from Indiuna [Mr. OuknJ eanie ii> 
 the eonehision that iherf; was a n sirivtion on this 
 right contaimd in the .'M article, to be found in the 
 olii article. I will now call the attention of the 
 committee to these, restrictions. The first restric- 
 tion is contained in the 4lh article, whiili reads an 
 Coilows; 
 
 "I lis Britannic Majesty cngiiges to take the most 
 ' etl'ectunl measures to prevent the navigation and 
 ' fishery of his subjects in the Pacific ocean or in 
 ' the South sens from being made a pretext for 
 'illicit trade with the Spanish settlements; and 
 ' with this view it is morcoviir stipulated, that the 
 ' British subj(!cts shall not navigate and curry on 
 ' tlieir fishery in .faid seas within the space of ten 
 'sea leatrues from any part of the coast already 
 ' occupied by Spain." 
 
 This, Mr. Chairman, is the first restrietiin. 
 Does this restriction go to negative or conti'ol the 
 right of Kni;:lisli subjects to make settlements on 
 any pnrt of the territory not occupied by Spain ? 
 It is suflicient merely to say it does not. 
 
 But it is supposed that the .'jtli article controls 
 this right; but the construction I put on it is entire- 
 ly different. The article is as follows: 
 
 "As well in the places to be restored to the Brit- 
 ' i.sh subjects by virtue of the 1st article, as in all 
 ' other parts of* the northwestern coasts of North 
 ' Anioriea, as well as the islands adjacent, situate to 
 ' the north of the parts of .said coast already occu- 
 ' ]iied by Spain, wherever the subjects of either of 
 ' the two Powers r-hall have made settlements since 
 ' the month of April, 1789, or shall hereafter make 
 ' any, the .subjects of the other shall have free ac- 
 ' cess, and shall carry on their trade without any 
 ' disturbance or molestation." 
 
 This article, Mr. Chairman, so far from being a 
 n siriciit)ii on the ,3d article, is simply an enlarge- 
 ment of the 4th. The 4th article is; You vthe Brit- 
 ish) shall not trade with the Spanish subjects. The 
 .'ilh article is: You may trade with the Spanish sub- 
 jects ill those settlements hereafter made by the 
 Spaniards north of their jiresent settlements. It is, 
 therefore, simply an enlargement of the restriction 
 contained in the 4th article. If this be the right 
 construction, the right to make settlements is unre- 
 strained; and I ask, if the British subjects had the 
 right to settle any part of the territory not previous- 
 "y occupied, and there make their permanent homes 
 without anything being said as to the time when 
 they should abiiiuhm them, — I ask — in the name 
 of common sense, I appeal to all who have some 
 idea of the legal ell'ect of treaties — what influence 
 can a war have on this right ? 
 
 Am I to be told at tli's day, and are we to sanc- 
 tion the doctrine, that when nations enter into a 
 contract, which has been executed, and rights vest- 
 ed in perjietuity under the contract, that a sub- 
 sequent war will divest those rights — annul this 
 contract? If so, it is a new era in the history of 
 international law; a new doctrine, which would 
 be lound tc be destructive of the best interests of 
 
 us 
 
;t 
 
 itizcns Imvc 
 
 i;ii| made snttl,;. 
 'irliniM('.s, with- 
 ''•'< to tinu; — oil 
 e <'iiiii|)<H(,.(| to 
 
 )wE\J caiMP to 
 ri^'tioii oil ilij,^ 
 "• IniiiKj in (In; 
 III iition of till! 
 'Ik' (ii'.st rcstiMc- 
 wliirli roads tm 
 
 U) Utkc t ho most 
 n.'iv illation and 
 ifif ocean or in 
 
 a pretext for 
 ileinnnts; and 
 
 iitpd, that the 
 'c iind rurry on 
 >e space of (en 
 
 coast already 
 
 rst rrstrictiin. 
 ■ or eontrol the 
 
 settlements on 
 piod hy Spain ? 
 
 not. 
 
 nitiele controls 
 " "n it i3 eiitire- 
 \vs: 
 
 ircd to tlie Drit- 
 :irticle, as in all 
 "oasLs of North 
 ;iceiit, situate to 
 it ah-eadv occu- 
 ~cts of citlicr of 
 ttlcments shico 
 hereafter mako 
 II have free ao 
 lo without any 
 
 ir from beincf a 
 ply an enlarfje- 
 You vthe Brit- 
 subjeeta. The 
 le Spanish sub- 
 • made by the 
 ements. It is, 
 the restriction 
 is be the rijjht 
 ments is unre- 
 bjects liad the 
 ' notprevious- 
 manenthomea 
 the time wiien 
 -in tiic name 
 ho Jiave some 
 v'hat influence 
 
 I'c wc to sanc- 
 1 enter into a 
 lid rights vest- 
 t, that a sub- 
 i — annul this 
 he history of 
 whicl) would 
 It interosta of 
 
 nations. No such doctrine can be maintained here 
 or anywiicre else. 
 
 We hold, llicn, Mr. Chairman, the Spanish 
 tiile, if fjcntlenien .-oe fit to rely on it, but rhnrf^'ed 
 wiili tiie rii,'ht of the I'irilisli Ciovcriiment, to wit: 
 that their sulijects may make settlements in the ter- 
 ritory ill places not already occujiied, and there 
 erei't' their homes. Tliis Sjianish title is (barged 
 with this light. I»iit whether we claim by the 
 oiii.' title or by the other, or by both, the Govern- 
 ment of Great Britain has rights in the territory, 
 niid we wish to make a division of the soil. We 
 arc no longer willing to remain in joint occupancy, 
 nor can we assert title to the \\ hole territory. I 
 am willing to assert for my constituents, and for 
 the American people, every right that belongs to 
 thein; but no power on earth can make me assert 
 claims to rights, when those are negatived by con- 
 tract and by law. Nor will 1 advocate the doc- 
 triiK' th;it we must seize upon territory contrary to 
 treaty ."stipulalioiia, contrary to the laws of nations, 
 merely beiuiuse we wish to ajipropriatc it to our 
 use. 
 
 Now for the division line. The 49lh degree 
 seems to me to be equitable and just. I think we 
 have commilted rmrselves to this line: we have of- 
 fered it once, twice — nay, three times. By thesi; 
 oilers, we have admitted Engltind had claims. 
 With what faith, I ask, can we now assert title to 
 the whole? Can wc, then, go for this resolution, 
 without even qualifying it, to .show that Great Brit- 
 ain lias rights which are the subject of negotiation.' 
 It has been asserted by the Executive that our title 
 to the whole is jjerfect. In this, I am conipelled 
 to difftr with him. I cannot shut my eyes to the 
 rights adverse to our own. 
 
 Mr. Chairman, I would prefer a resolution giving 
 the notice, with a distinct assertion of the extent 
 of our rights; that is, that we will never yield any 
 portion of the territory south of latitude 49. If we 
 would do this, depend on it England would not go 
 to war for any territory south of that line. Our 
 riy;lit to it is best. I would never yield one foot 
 south of it, be the consequences what they may, 
 but for us to assert our title to the whole — to pre- 
 pare our.selvcs to maintain this title — will produce 
 war beyond all jiossible doubt. And although I 
 will not undertake to describe the horrors of war, 
 let me say, if a conllic* ensues, the whole civilizi d 
 world will feel the .shock. I trust in tlie name of 
 God that this country will never be involved in a 
 war by asserting title to that which is not ours; 
 and I trust we will never fear to assert title to our 
 own. Nor will the assertion.s of title to that which 
 is clearly ours ever involve us in a war with any 
 nali(>n; or if it does, it will not be a war of aggres- 
 sion; it will be one of right, our quarrel will be 
 just, and we should have nothing to fear from Eng- 
 land or from the world. 
 
 I Hc.c the necessity of giving notice to determine 
 this convention, to prevent bloodshed; but let us 
 accompmiy it with a clear and distinct declaration 
 as to the extent of our rights. We would not 
 yield our rights to England, will she yield hers to 
 us? Although I believe the Executive thinks our 
 right to the whole perfect, for he has so said, I 
 cannot agree with him; the conduct of our Gov- 
 ernment is opposed to his views — the rights of dis- 
 covery and the construction of treaties oppose his 
 views. His opinions, however, will have a pow- 
 
 erful cflV.ct on the public mind; we should check 
 it; we should show to our ftillow-citizeiis the ex- 
 tent of their rights, and I would with |)leusiire go 
 for the notice with this declaration of tde extent of 
 our rights. 
 
 Mr. Chairman, I would oven go fir a notice 
 that would.admit that Great Britain bad a inter- 
 est ill the territory the subject-iiuitti r of nei^otia- 
 tion, for this would be to disabuse the public mind. 
 It would be tantamo'.int to sayini; Gnat Britain 
 has interest in Oregon; but to deny that she has, 
 and so to teacii the |mblic that ail is ours, must, 
 beyond all doubt, producf- war. True it is, that 
 the giving of this notice is the exercise of a mere 
 conventional right, and within itself not a cause of 
 war; but he is not entitled to the name of a pru- 
 dent counsellor who will exerci.se this right merely 
 because he niav do so, witliout regard to the con- 
 sequences. We should look to the consetiuences. 
 Give the notice in this simple, unqualified form, 
 and the question must then be settled, either by 
 negotiation or by the sword. The President says 
 negotiation is ended — that it cannot be so settled. 
 Then the only ul'ernaiive left is war; a war, too, 
 under the assertion of title to the whole. We 
 could not be justified before mankind; we could 
 not elicit their sympathies; we should be consider- 
 ed the a^'-gressors. But let us declare, and declare 
 truly, the extent of our rights. Our title is before 
 the world, the title of England before them — and 
 we should be sustained by the nations of the earth. 
 England herself, seeing that we claimed nothing 
 but that which is our own, would yield to our 
 claim without resort to arms. The ((ueslion is one 
 of moment; the lives of thousands depend, or may 
 depend, u])on our action. Let us not act rashly, 
 nor hazard the lives of our fellow-beings in assert- 
 ing a doubtful title; yea, in asserting a title to the 
 whole, when, beyond all doubt, we have no ex- 
 clusive tide. But should we give this notice, with 
 a view to settle the question by negotiation, by as- 
 serting title only to that which is ours, or by ad- 
 mitting that Great Britain had interests which were 
 the subject of compromise, and she should refuse 
 to negotiate, and allow us our rights, the resjion- 
 sibility, yea, the evils of the war would be hers. 
 But let us claim only our rights, and there will be 
 no danger of war, or of its horrors. 
 
 I see, Mr. Chairman, I have a few minutes more. 
 I will reply to one sugi^estion I have lieard express- 
 ed, " that'the tree of liberty flcmrishcd best when 
 moistened with blood." This is not the tree of lib- 
 erty I admire; and when the tree of liberty ]»lant- 
 cd by our fathers requires the blood of tlieir de- 
 scendants to give it nourishment, I say, cut it down, 
 tear it up by the roots, and cast it from us. But, 
 Mr. Chairman, the tree of liberty I admire flour- 
 ishes best in peace; yea, when the rights of all 
 arc regiu'ded and respected, then will its boughs 
 extend and give protection to all, and under it all 
 will be content — all happy. To protect this, sir, I 
 would say, let blood be shed: nor should the ruth- 
 less hand of tyranny pluck one bough from the 
 trunk. Permit me to say, that my constituents 
 would freely shed their blood ere this tree should 
 be injured. I will not pass any encomiums on my 
 constituents, nor speak of their martial spirit. 
 But if a war should come, let it come as it will. 
 For good, suflicicnt, or insufficient cause, I do not 
 think we shall nsk to borrow fortitude of our friends 
 
I 
 
 win?„r!.^n^ I iti misfortune.. No, «,r, we and •till they stand and east ti.crr. nark on her own 
 will gather on our beach, bes.d^ our native rocks, bosom. So would we stand and drive back Z 
 asmnst which the mad waves of '.old Ocean " foes, and make them seek the quie of their Z- 
 httve beat for agea past without impression made, I sions in their own homes ^ ^ 
 
 'M 
 
I 
 
 \rk on her own 
 Irive bark our 
 St of their paa-