'iu 
 
 e> 
 
 -,%. 
 
 ^-^ 
 
 
 IMAGfc EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 
 
 :a 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 lliu 
 
 1.25 
 
 IM ill 2. 5 
 
 1^ 
 
 f ^ lis 
 
 1^ «£ IM 
 
 i.4 
 
 6" 
 
 1.6 
 
 -V 
 
 w 
 
 <# 
 
 rt/ 
 
 <PV^ 
 
 Vi 
 
 #> 
 
 
 W 
 
 o 
 
 / 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 V'EBSTEk, NY. 14580 
 
 (716) 87'>-4i03 
 
 S."^ 
 ^ 
 
 ■1>^ 
 
 ,\ 
 
 \ 
 
 \ 
 
 ^9> 
 
 V 
 
 
 
 
 % 
 
 V 
 
 ^ 
 
 > 
 
 <i^ 
 
 --••^v. 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 1 
 I 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut canadien de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 do cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiqu^s ci-dessous. 
 
 n 
 
 n 
 
 v\ 
 
 n 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagee 
 
 □ Covers re 
 Couvertu 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 re restaurSe et/ou pellicul^e 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 Le tit 
 
 titre de couverture manque 
 
 I j Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes g6ographiques en couleur 
 
 I ! En 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 ere de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couieur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Flelie avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or di^itortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge int^rieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 I! so peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t§ film^es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaiies suppldmentaires: 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 / 
 
 n 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages resta'jr^es et/ou pellicul^es 
 
 Pages dir<coloured, stained or foxcid/ 
 Pages ddcolordes, tachet6es ou piqu^es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages detach^es 
 
 0Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 □ Quality of pri 
 Quality in^qa 
 
 nt varies/ 
 dgale de Timpression 
 
 □ Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel s'jpplementaire 
 
 □ Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponiblo 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscurod by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 filmdes d nouveau de fagon ei 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 Th's item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 y 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 IVIorisset Library 
 University of Ottawa 
 
 L'exemplaire i\\m6 fut reproduit grAce d la 
 g6n6rosit6 de: 
 
 Blbiiothdque Morisset 
 University d'Ottawa 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites av3C le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetd de l'exemplaire film6. et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the '.ast page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprim^e sont filmds en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'imp<ression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 pidt, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont fitm6s en commenpant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou li'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernidre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol — h^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitrj sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon la 
 cas: le symbole —^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 differe.it reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning -n the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cirtes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 filmds d des taux de reduction diffdrents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reproduit en un seul clichd, il est filmd d partir 
 de Tangle supdrieur gauche, de gauche d droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcesfaire. Les dtagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mdthode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
A TREATISE 
 
 ON THE 
 
 mt. (ft- >l,'l 
 
 o 
 
 PROCEEDINGS TO BE ADOPTED 
 
 IN CONDUCTING OR OrPOSINa 
 
 PEIVATE BILLS 
 
 IN tua 
 
 ?qHii)ii()ei)t of Cmh'y 
 
 AND THE 
 
 STANBINa ORDERS OF BOTH HOUSES 
 
 IS KKI.ATION THKRETO. 
 
 BY ALFRED TODD, 
 
 CHIEF CLERK OP COMMITTEES AND PRIVATE BILLS, 
 HOUSE OP COMMONS. 
 
 THIRD EDITION, 
 
 EMBRACINa TIIK LATEST CnANOES IN THE PRACTICE. 
 
 OTTAWA : 
 PUBLISHED BY JOHN DURIF & SON, SPARKS STREET. 
 
 1868. 
 
"% 
 
 \ 
 
 , -Q ^^e year 1868> »7 
 
 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 In the first Sesnion of the first rarliaraent of the Dominion, the 
 Rules and Practice in force in the old Province of Canada with 
 regard to Private Bills were adopted by Parliament, with some 
 modifications in the details, which, though of importance in their 
 place, effected no material alteration in the system. These are all 
 embodied in the present Edition of this work; and as no clearly 
 defined Private Bill system of practice has prevailed in the Local 
 Legislatures of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the precedents 
 referred to are ail taken from Canadian practice; they include 
 those given in the last Edition, and others gleaned from subseque:it 
 legislation, both in the Provincial Parliament, and in the first Ses- 
 sion of that of the Dominion. 
 
 In the course of the last mentioned Session, it happened upon 
 several occasions, that doubts arose as to the true interpretation of 
 those provisions of the " British North America Act " which placed 
 certain classes of subjects under the exclusive control of the General 
 Parliament, and of the Provincial Legislatures, respectively. A 
 chapter has therefore been added, on " Legislative Jurisdiction," in 
 which mention is made of the various questions that arose from 
 time to time, and the course taken thereon ; and certain observa- 
 
IV 
 
 PREFACE. 
 
 tious and «ugge«tions are offered, in the hope tliat some plan may 
 be devised for obtaiuing a more definite interpretation of tlie 
 Imperial Act in this respect. 
 
 The authorities cited in explanation of the Imperial practice, 
 are : — 
 
 Report on the practice of the House of Commons upon Private 
 Bills : witli suggestions for the future regulation of Private Busi- 
 ness in the Legislative Assembly of Canada. By Alpheus Todd, 
 Librarian to the Legislative Assembly. (1847.) 
 
 lleport from Select Committee of the House of Commons on the 
 Business of the House. (18C1 ,) 
 
 May on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings, and Usage of Par- 
 liament. Sixth edition. (18G8.) 
 
 Sherwood on the proceedings to be adopted in conducting Pri- 
 vate Bills through the House of Commons. Third edition. (1834.) 
 
 Frere's Practice of Committees of the House of Commons, with 
 reference especially to Private Bills. (1846.) 
 
 Bristowe on Private Bill legislation in the Imperial Parlia- 
 ment. (1859.) 
 
 House ov Commons, 
 
 Ottawa, November, 1868. 
 
preface: to the first edition. 
 
 Parlia- 
 
 TiiE object of tliirt work, is to cxtthiin fully the proceedings at the 
 various stages, in either House, aiul in Committee, upon Private 
 Bills solicited in the Parliament of Canada. The system of practice, 
 hough based on that adopted in the Imperial Parliament, differs 
 Vom it materially in many of the details ; and the absence of any 
 land-book or guide to the course of proceedings to be observed, has 
 )ccn long felt, not only by parties soliciting or opposing Bills, but 
 Iso by Members of the Legislature charged with the conduct of 
 uch Bills in either House. 
 
 The writer has been connected with the Private Bill Office since 
 H establishment, and has thus had an opportunity of noting down, 
 
 they occurred, the various decisions and modifications which have 
 
 een made from time to time, and which have established the 
 
 lystera of practice as it now stands; while in all matters not 
 
 pecially provided for, reference is made (in accordance with a 
 
 tanding Order) to the usages of the Imperial Parliament. 
 
 The Rules of the two Houses concerning Private Bills arc 
 ppended to the work. The Provincial precedents referred to 
 based on decisions or practice, in the House or in Committee,) 
 ill be found in the Journals of the Legislative Assembly (the prc- 
 
 nt system having been but recently introduced into the Upper 
 
 ouse). 
 
 Legislative Assembly, 
 Quebec, May, 1862. 
 
PREFACE TO THE .SECOND EDITION. 
 
 I { 
 
 Thk first edition of this Treatise was published early in the 
 Scsaion of 18G2, when the new Rules adopted by the ]ie,i;islativi 
 Council assimilatin*^ the practice of the two Houses first came into 
 operation. Certain modifications of the Rules and practice, calcu 
 lated to define more clearly the requirements of the Rules, and the 
 powers of the Committee on Standin.;; Orders, and also to facilitate 
 the transaction of business between the two Houses, were suggested 
 in the course of the Session, and these having been agreed upon h] 
 the Private Bill Committee of each House, were embodied in 
 Reixirts to the Legislative Coancil and Legislative Assembly, 
 respectively, and received their concurrence. 
 
 The alterations thus made, though comparatively unimportant, 
 rendered it desirable that a new edition of this work should bo 
 issued ; and the Committee of the Legislative Assembly haviiii! 
 specially recommended that this should be done, a second edition 
 has been prepared accordingly, embodying the changes above refer 
 red to, and also the precedents established by decisions and practice 
 in tlie year 1862. 
 
 Legislative Assembly, 
 Quebec, July, 1862. 
 
)N. 
 
 early in the 
 Lcj^islativc 
 8t came into 
 let ice, calcu 
 lies, and tlie 
 to facilitate 
 re suggested 
 ced upon bj 
 smbodied in 
 1 Assembly, 
 
 m important, 
 k should bo 
 iibly having 
 iond edition 
 above refer- 
 and practice 
 
 CONTENTS. 
 
 fAQE. 
 
 1. Preliminary Observations I 
 
 2. rJefmilion of a Private Bill 7 
 
 3. IjCgialative Jurisdiction regarding Private Bills. . ^ 13 
 
 4. Parliamentary Agents 29 
 
 5. Petitions for Private Bills 32 
 
 6. Proof of Notices, before Committee on Standing Orders 35 
 
 7. Presentation and first reading of Bill 54 
 
 8. Payment of Fee and charges 59 
 
 9. Committees on Private Bills, and their powers 64 
 
 10. Proceedings in Committee on Bill 71 
 
 11. Second reading of Bill 97 
 
 12. Proceedings in Committee of the whole 101 
 
 13. Third reading of Bill 109 
 
 14. Proceedings on Private Bills in the Senate 113 
 
 15. Royal Assent 119 
 
 APPENDIX. 
 
 I. Rules common to both Houses, in relation to Private Bills 122 
 
 II. Rules of the Senate concerning Bills of Divorce 134 
 
 I. Form of Petition to the three Branches of the Legislature, for 
 
 . a Private Bill 138 
 
i I 
 
 f^- 
 
 T 
 
 Bill 
 upo 
 fror 
 cee( 
 fere 
 Tm 
 legii 
 also 
 in SI 
 app: 
 toil 
 1^ 
 
. ■)"» 
 
 PROCEEDINGS 
 
 TO UB ADOPTED IN COMDOCTlNf. 
 
 PRIVATE BILLS 
 
 TUnOUQB THB 
 
 PARLIAMENT OF CANADA. 
 
 1.— PRELIMINARY OfeSERVATIOMS. 
 
 The distinction between Public and Private Dhtincuoa 
 Bills is one that has been recognized and acted Pubiiraad 
 upon by the Parliament of the Mother Country l^iJ^^" 
 from a very early period, and the mode of pro- 
 ceeding upon the two classes of bills has also dif- 
 fered in some important particulars. In passing 
 Private Bills, while ParHament still exercises its 
 legislative functions, its proceedings also partake 
 also of a judicial character ; the parties interested 
 in such bills appear as suitors, while those who 
 apprehend injury are admitted as adverse parties 
 to the suit. 
 
 Much of the foimality of a Court of Justice is 
 
i I 
 
 First pro- 
 yiaion for 
 P-'vate 
 Bills in 
 Canada 
 
 M: 
 
 rRELIMINARy OBSERVATIONS. 
 
 maintained ; conditions are required to be ob- 
 served and their observance proved by the pro- 
 moters of a bill, and if tnev abandon it and no 
 other i:)arties take it up, the bill is dropped, how- 
 ever sensible the House may be of its value.* 
 
 Although this distinction was recognized by the 
 Legislature of the old "Province of Canada" in 
 framing Kules for its guidance at its first Session 
 (in 1841) by the adoption of a provision requiring 
 two months' notice of applications for private 
 bills, and the exaction of a fee of iJ20 on all such 
 bills ; and also by the appointment, every Session, 
 of a Stanainp- Committee on Private Bills ; little 
 else was done towards the adoption of a regular 
 system of practice until the year 1846, when the 
 Speaker of the Legislative Assembly was author- 
 ized to cause an inquiry to be made into the sys- 
 tem pursued in the House of Commons, with a 
 view to the preparation of a system of Standing 
 Orders and practice adapted to the circumstances 
 of the Province.f The result of this was laid 
 on the table of the House in the following Session 
 A'pheus^ in the shape of a Report, prepared by Mr. Alpheus 
 port on Todd, the present Librarian of the Canadian 
 
 Privftto 
 
 Bill Prac- Housc of Commous, giving a full and lucid ex- 
 *'*'*' plaiiation of the system of practice in operation 
 
 • May, p. 633. 
 
 t Assembly Jouru., 1846, p. 344. 
 
 ■ I 
 
 _jL^ ^ 
 
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. ^ 
 
 ill the I.mporial rarliament, and submitting a code 
 of orders and regulations such as appeared suit- 
 able to the requirements of Canada.* No im- 
 mediate action was taken upon this Keporl, but 
 in the same Session the practice of referring both 
 petitions and bills to the Committee on rrivato 
 Bills indiscriminately was discontinued, and 
 petitions were from that time referred to the 
 Committee on Standing Orders, for proof of a 
 compliance with the Itules of the Hoi^se. In Private 
 1850, a I'iivate Bill OOice was established, in pur- 
 suance of a suggestion contained in the above- 
 mentioned liei^ort, and a system of practice 
 organised, which, with some few modilications 
 subsequently in the details, is that now in use. 
 
 Up to the year 18GI, no regulations had been Former 
 made by the Legislative Council of Canada con- KouSdi! 
 cerning private bills, except to reqiii) e an official 
 report to the Speaker of the notices given on 
 petitions, end the payment of a fee on all such 
 billi! as originated in that House : but in the S(\s- 
 sioii of 18G1, a conference was held between the 
 two Houses, which led to the adoption, ])y the 
 Council, of the Private Bill liules of the Assem- 
 bly verbatim ft literatv,ri .^ These Rules were 
 slightly modiiicd in succeeding Sessions, and, in 
 
 * Assembly Journ., 1817, p. 31. (App. B) 
 t L. Council Journ., 18G1, pp. 98, 104. 
 
 M 
 
M!! 
 
 
 !i 
 
 Hi 
 
 4 I^MLIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. 
 
 the first Session of tiie Parliament of Canada held 
 lltf"'' "" nnder the authority of the "British North Ameri- 
 Houscs ca Act, 1807," thev were adopted by both Houses, 
 
 -now nearly > > j x j 
 
 identical, with soine further modili cations as j-egards the 
 Commons, which were not made in the llules of 
 the Senate ; the Rules as adopted by etvch House, 
 will be found at the end of this work, (Appendix 
 I,) together with certain additional Rules of the 
 Senate relatmg to Divorce Bills. (Api^endix II.) 
 The practice of the two Houses being thus made 
 almost identical, the account given in the follow- 
 ing pages, of the proceedings on Petitions and Bills 
 in the Lower House, will apply substantially to 
 the Upper, any diversity of practice between the 
 two Houses being speciall}'- poinh^d out in the 
 appropriate place. It should be stated, however, 
 that the fee is charged only in the House in which 
 the bill originates,* and all expenses for printing 
 and translation being exacted at the same time, 
 no payment is required to be made in the other 
 House, except in cases where a bill i,^ ordered to 
 be reprinted, when the expense mufc t be borne 
 In which by its promoters. As a general rule, i>rivate bills 
 va^irBiiis may originate in either House, but it being the 
 naL ^"^' exclusive right of the Commons to impose and 
 appropriate all charges imposed upon the people, 
 every bill which involves any tax, rate, toll, or 
 
 
 58th Rule. 
 
ida lieJd 
 
 I Amcri- 
 llouses, 
 irds the 
 llulos of 
 
 House, 
 
 peiidix 
 s of the 
 dixll.) 
 as made 
 
 follow- 
 nd Bills 
 tially to 
 een the 
 
 in the 
 owever, 
 
 II which 
 milting- 
 le time, 
 e other 
 lered to 
 i borne 
 ate bills 
 ing the 
 ose and 
 people, 
 toll, or 
 
 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. 5 
 
 duty, ought to be first brought into that House.* 
 It has followed from this restriction that by far 
 the greater number of private bills have been 
 first passed by the Lower House .f It may be 
 worthy of consideration whether it might not be 
 desirablor ill" this country, also to include bills re- 
 lating to Banking in this category, as they are 
 n©BessarUv' subject to the supervision of the Min 
 ister of Firidnofi-^j^ho has always a scat in the 
 Commons. The IJot'H^1^4jfte^nerally originated 
 naturalization, name, estate, Wd^^'lfiA'^jce bills,J 
 but this has not been the practice with thftf^p^e^ 
 House, in this country, save only as regards;^^^ 
 divorce bills, which have invariably been intro- 
 duced first into that House. 
 
 The House of Commons of G-reat Britain, by a Arrange- 
 Standing Order of 1858 (No. 67), have provided J^^enVho 
 that the Chairman of Ways and Means, shall, at twcOJousoa ;. 
 
 ^ ' ' for ortgiH-,^ 
 
 the commencement of each Session, confer with ating biii«^ ". - 
 the Chairman of Committees of the House of , 
 
 Lords, for the purpose of determining in which 
 
 iji 
 
 • Mf-y, pp. 437, 635. 
 
 t The House of Commons of Great Britain, bj a Standing 
 Order of 2Vth July, 1558, have agreed '< that this House will not 
 insist on its privileges with regard to any clauses in private bills 
 sent down from the House of Lords, which refer to tolls and 
 charges for services performed, and are not in the nature of a 
 tax." 
 
 t May, p. 636. 
 
 
i t 
 
 6 
 
 II 
 
 PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. 
 
 House the resi^ective private bills should be first 
 considered, and report the same to the House. -^ 
 This arrangement was the result of a recommen- 
 dation contained in the 3rd Report of the Select 
 Committee of the House of Commons on Private 
 Bills, in 1847. (p. 6.) 
 
 * Bristowe's Private Bill Practice, pp. 15, 73. An example 
 of the result of this arrangement will be seen by referring to the 
 Commons Journals of 1860, p. 16. 
 
I be first 
 House. "^ 
 jommen- 
 le Select 
 . Private 
 
 .n example 
 rin": to the 
 
 2.— DEFINITION OF A PRIVATE BILL. 
 
 Every bill lor the particular interest or benefit fet"°en'°° 
 lof any person or persons, is treated as a i)rivate j^ubUc^and 
 |J)ill, whether it be for the interest of an individual, Bills, 
 public company or corporation, a parish, a 
 illy, a county, or other locality ; * it is equally 
 listing'uished from a measure of public policy in 
 rhich the whole community are interested, and 
 lis distinction is marked by the solicitation of 
 )rivate bills by the parties whose interests are 
 joncerned.f 
 There is a class of bills, however, which, thou^^h Somi- 
 
 ^ private 
 
 local or special in their operation, yet havmgbeen biiu. 
 solicited by persons not in the interest of the 
 )arties to be affected by their ojieration, or having 
 )een introduced upon public grounds, have been 
 treated by the Legislature as public bills. Bills 
 |of this class have occasionally been introduced as 
 )rivate, and referred to the Standing Committee 
 
 * A bill for the benefit of three Counties has been held by 
 ihe British House of Commons to be a private bill. 1 Commons 
 [Journ., p. 388. 
 
 t May, p. 626. 
 
/ 
 
 k.^ 
 
 y 
 
 I ii 
 
 8 
 
 DEFINITION OF A 
 
 '^""^^'Oii Prh^ate Bills, but upon their report that they 
 were pubHc, rather than i^rivate in their charac- 
 ter, they have been referred by the House to an- 
 other committee, and treated otherwise as public 
 bills.* It must be obvious, however, that on bills 
 of this nature, the same notice should be required J 
 as upon a private bill, with the exception only of 
 such as are introduced ^x\^o\\ some well-defined 
 princix)le of public i:>olicy or right. 
 
 Victoria 111 1858, the Committee on Private Bills report- 
 New Town- . _ -^ 
 
 sbipa Bill, ed, with reference to a bill to attach certain newly 
 biy.) surveyed townshijDS to the County of Victoria, 
 that they were in doubt whether the bill came 
 within their i^rovince, inasmuch as it affected the 
 Territorial Divisions of the Province, the Repre- 
 sentation, and the administration of Justice ; but 
 they prepared such amendments as appeared to 
 them desirable, and left it to the House to con- 
 sider whether action should be taken on their re- 
 port or not. The House took the bill into con- 
 sideration with the proposed amendments, and 
 treated it therefore as a private bill.f In 1864, 
 the same course was taken (with a like result) in 
 
 * Quebec Recorder's Court, 1856 ; Montreal Trinity House 
 (amending the provisions concerning pilotage), 1857 f Quebec 
 Harbour (a Government Trust), 1858 ; River Welland Bridges 
 Protection, 185^ ; Caisse d'Economie de St. Roch Investigation, 
 1861 ; Rimouski and Gaspe division, 1865. 
 
 t Assembly Journ., 1858, pp. 568, 684. 
 

 PRIVATE BILL. 
 
 [elerence to a bill respecting the Common of the 
 [uron Indians at Lorette, which was not con- 
 iderecl private, the Indians being under the 
 pecial protection of the Crown * 
 
 In the British House of Commons, may be in- 
 
 tanced the Passing Tolls on Shipping Bill (intro- 
 
 luced in 1856), which was held to be a piiblic 
 
 >ill. It concerned the harbours of Dover, Rams- 
 
 ^ate, "Whitby and Bridlington, abolished passing 
 
 )lls, transferred the control of those harbours to 
 
 le Board of Trade, imposed tolls, and repealed 
 
 >cal Acts ; but, being a measure of general policy, 
 
 [s character was not changed by the fact that 
 
 lese harbours only came under its operation. 
 
 'he Eed Sea and India Telegraph Bill (in 1861), 
 
 rhich amended a private Act, was introduced 
 
 id passed as a public bill, as it concerned the 
 mditions of a government guarantee.! The 
 practice in Canada has been to treat all Bills re- 
 iting to the Representation,! the adminisira- 
 ion of .Tustice,§ or the protection of the Indians 
 
 • Assembly Journ., 186J, pp. 391, 478. 
 
 t May, p, 629. 
 
 t Armagh Representation, 1858 ; Peel do., 1858 ; Drum- 
 lond and Arthabaska do., 1858 ; Bill to transfer Delaware from 
 ^lie West to the East Riding (Electoral Division) of Middlesex, 
 L8G2 ; Hochelaga polls, 186.3 (Aug. Sess.) 
 
 §, Montreal Recorder's Court, 1852-3 5 Gasp6 Circuit Court, 
 1852-3; Huntingdon Circuit Court, 1854-5; Montmagny do., 
 
 9 
 
 Commou 
 of T.orette 
 Indians 
 Bill, (do.) 
 
 Passing 
 Tolls on 
 Shipp'ng 
 BilUCom 
 mons). 
 
 Red Sen 
 and India 
 Telegraph 
 Bill, (do.) 
 
il 
 
 II I 
 
 I! 
 
 Certain 
 bills treat- 
 ed as pub- 
 lic bills. 
 
 Rectorial 
 lands sale 
 Bill. 
 
 10 DEFINITION OF A 
 
 and their lands and property,* however local oil 
 partial in their operation, as public bills, these] 
 questions being under the especial charge of the] 
 Administration, and being dealt with on broad) 
 general principles. All bills relating to Govern- 
 ment Trusts or Commissions,! or public works] 
 under Grovernmont control,^ are likewise sol 
 treated. 
 
 Biiii in- Some bills, though strictly private, having' 
 irregularly been introduced irregularly {i e., not based upon i 
 petition, in the usual way), the committee have 
 declined to proceed upon them.§ In 1864, 
 a bill to enable the Church Societies and Incor- 
 porated Synods of the Church of England Dio- 
 ceses in Canada to sell the Rectorial lands in the 
 said Dioceses, having been sent do^^^l by the Leg- 
 islative Council, obiection was taken at the second 
 reading, that the bill was a priv^ate one, and 
 should have been brought in on a petition ; and 
 
 1858 ; Kamouraska Gaol and Court House, 1863 (Aug. Sess.) ; 
 Quebec Recorder's Court, 1864 and 1865. See also May, p. 629. 
 
 * Common of Lorette Indians, 1864. 
 
 t Montreal Trinity House, 185Y ; Quebec Harbour, 1858, 
 1863, and 1867-8 5 Montreal Turnpike Road Trust, 1861 ; Mont- 
 real Port Warden, 1862 and 1863 (Feb. Sess.) ; Montreal Har- 
 bour, 1865. 
 
 t Northern Railway^ 1859; Intercolonial Railway, 1867-8. 
 See May, p. 662. 
 
 § Rimouski and Gaspe division, 1865 (Jan. Sess.); Quebec 
 Corporation, 1866. 
 
PRIVATE BILL. 
 
 11 
 
 ;r local orl 
 ills, these] 
 rge of thel 
 
 on broadi 
 Groverii- 
 lie works! 
 lewise sol 
 
 S having! 
 ised iijooii 
 ttee have I 
 In 1864, 
 id Incor- 
 land Dio- 
 ids in the 
 ' the Leg- 
 le second 
 one, and 
 ion; and 
 
 LUg. Sess.) ; 
 lay, p. 629. 
 
 lOur, 1858, 
 SGI 5 ilont- 
 Qtreal Har- 
 
 r, 1867-8. 
 
 5 Quebec 
 
 ^e objection being sustained, the bill was not 
 foceeded with * In 186(5, objection was tajcen, ^JJJ^ ^«''' 
 
 the second reading, to a bill to extend the time 
 payuig the debt of the County of Perth (due 
 
 the Municipal Loan Fund) that it, though a 
 Irivate bill, affected the public revenue, and 
 tould therefore have originated in committee of 
 ie whole; and the objection was fatal to the 
 (ll.f It has been held that a bill commenced 
 
 a private bill cannot be to ken up and proceeded 
 [ith as a public bill.| 
 
 The proceedings observed in the Imperial Par- Difference 
 
 . • ii n • I ■^•^^ between 
 
 iment m the passage ot private bills, are neces- imperial 
 ^rily somewhat complicated in their character, dLn^p*rac'- 
 
 consequence of the numerous checks impos-ed *^°®' 
 ^r the protection of the many interests which 
 |iey may affect or involve ; and the expense at- 
 hiding these proceedings is considerable : but 
 lie different circumstances of this country, as one 
 it newly settled, allowing a freer scope for en- 
 Irprise, with comparatively little risk of infring- 
 tg upon existing rights or privileges, admit (for 
 [time at least) of a much simpler and more inex- 
 ;nsive system of Private Bill legislation. In ex- 
 gaining the system adopted (after various modi- 
 
 Assembly Journ., 1865 (Aug. Sess.), p. 123. 
 t Assembly Journ., 1866, p. 298. 
 X May, p. 631. 
 
 
I! i 
 1 1 < 
 
 12 
 
 \ 
 
 DEFINITION OF A PRIVATE BILL. 
 
 Proceed- iW!itioiis) by our Legislature, it is proposed 
 Commons state the various forms and proceedings so far aj 
 cribod first, caii Conveniently be done, in the order in whicli 
 they occur, from the presentation of the petition 
 (in either House) to the final passfige of the bill] 
 It will be convenient for this purpose to begi 
 with the House of Commons, but the course ob] 
 served in either House being now identical (witl 
 the exception of j)roceedings upon Divorce Billsj 
 in the Upper House, which are described in the 
 latter part of this work, and certain matters ofl 
 detail with reference to private bills generally, 
 which are noticed in the proper place), the des- 
 cription will apply equally to bills originating in| 
 the Senate. 
 
 4j!-.-;!^v' 
 
18 
 
 3.— LEGISLATIVE JUIUSDICTION 
 
 REaARDINO PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 By the x^roA'isioiis of " The British North 
 America Act, 1867," certain classes of Private 
 Bills are placed under the exclusive control of 
 the Parliament of the Dominion, and certain 
 others are transferred to the Provincial Legisla- 
 tures. 
 
 The classes of subjects which, under this Subjects 
 
 . 1 T-i under con- 
 
 arrangement, pertain exclusively to the Farlia- troi of Par- 
 ment of the Dominion, are thus defined by the Act : 
 Sec- 91. — Ferries between a Province and any 
 British or Foreign Country, or between 
 two Pro\'inces. 
 Banking, Incorporation of Banks, and the issue 
 
 of paper Money. 
 Savings Banks. 
 
 Patents of Invention and Discovery. 
 Naturalization and Aliens. 
 Marriage and Divorce, — and 
 Such classes of subjects as are expressly excepted 
 
 0! 
 

 Ml 
 li'i 
 
 I! 
 
 14 
 
 6nl)jecU 
 under 
 control of 
 Pari la- 
 ment* 
 
 Subjects 
 andcr con- 
 trol of Pro- 
 Tiucial 
 Legisla- 
 Inreg. 
 
 LEGI^IiATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 ill the enumeration of the classes of subjects 
 by this Act assigned exclusively to the 
 Legislatures of the Proviiices ; which ex- 
 ceptions are thus deiined, ill 
 Sec. 92, Sub-section 10: 
 
 a. Lines of Steam or other Ships, Railways. 
 
 Canals, Telegraphs, and other AVorks and 
 Undertakings «onnecting the Province 
 with any other or others of the Provinces, 
 or extending beyond the limits of the 
 Province : 
 
 b. Lines of Steam Ships between the Piovince 
 
 and any Briti.sh or Foreign Country : 
 
 c. Such Works as, although wholly situate 
 
 within the Province, are befoio or after 
 their execution declared by the Parliament 
 of Canada to be for the general advantage 
 of Canada, or for the advantage of two or 
 more of the Provinces. 
 
 Those which are placed under the exclusive 
 control of the Provincial Legislatures are thus 
 deiined : 
 
 Sec. 92, Sub-sec. 10. — Local Works and Under- 
 takings, other than such as form the excep- 
 tions above recited. 
 Sub-sec. Ix. — The incorporation of Companies 
 
 with Provincial objects. 
 Sub-sec. 16. — Generally all matters of a mere- 
 ly local or private nature in the Province. 
 
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 15 
 
 )rsul)jects 
 ly to th(.' 
 vhich ex- 
 
 Itaihvaysi. 
 
 'orks and 
 
 Proviiico 
 
 "roviiiccs. 
 
 ts of the 
 
 Pjovinci' 
 
 try: 
 
 y situate 
 
 3 or after 
 
 arliament 
 
 advantage 
 
 )f two or 
 
 exclusive 
 are thus 
 
 d Uuder- 
 he excep- 
 
 ompaiiies 
 
 )f a mere- 
 Province. 
 
 It will be observed that the line of distinction 
 lis defined clearly with regard to certain classes c|,i7o'Ji'to*t, 
 lof subjects only. Sub-section 10 empowers the f«rthe gm- 
 
 'arliament of Canada to assume the control of tage. 
 [any works wholly situate within one Province, 
 that may be declared by that Body to be for the 
 advantage of the Dominion, or of two or more 
 [Provinces. Two instances of this occurred in 
 the first Session of Parliament, in the case oi the 
 Bill to incorporate the proprietors of the Ottawa st. Law- 
 land Prescott Railway, by the name of " The St. Ottawa 
 Lawrence and Ottawa Railway Company," and ^»'^''*y- 
 [the Bill respecting the Northern Railway of i^oj^her. 
 Canada — in the enactment of each of which l)ills, Ra'^^»y- 
 [Parliament declared, that the Railway therein 
 [referred to was " a work for the general advan- 
 ftaiye of Canada."* The first mentioned bill con- 
 tained a provision empowering the St. Lawrence 
 and Ottawa Railway Company to build, a bridge 
 over the River Ottawa, and to construct a branch 
 to Lake Deschesnes, in the Province of Quebec ; 
 but it was argued, in debate, that this would not in 
 itself justify legislation by the Parliament of 
 Canada, in reference to a Railway situate wholly 
 within one Province, as it might afford a danger- 
 ous precedent to parties desirous of evading the 
 jurisdiction of the Local Legislatures over works 
 
 * 31 Vic, c. 20, se:. 1, and c. 86, sec. 2. 
 
I if. 
 
 !i! 
 
 iitlil 
 
 16 
 
 All Rail- 
 ways inter- 
 secting 
 Grand 
 Trunk 
 sbouM bo 
 under soino 
 control. 
 
 Worlcs ex- 
 temling be- 
 yond limits 
 of a Pro- 
 vince. 
 
 LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION^. 
 
 ol" a purely local character ; and the course was 
 adoi:)te(l of introducing the clause abo-\ e men- 
 tioned, in order to bring the bill properly vrithin 
 the jurisdiction of the Parliament of the Dominion. 
 
 These Railways are, thus far, the only ones of 
 a local character that have ])een legislated upon 
 by Parliament ; but a]i imx:)ression would ajipear 
 to prevail, that all llailways intersecting the 
 Grand Trunk should be under the same Parlia- 
 mentary control, to avoid the serious difficulties 
 and inconveniences that might arise (so long as 
 they are subject to a different jurisdiction) from 
 conflicting reguktions in reference to the running 
 of trains, inspec.xv^n of Railway, gauge, and other 
 matters of detail. 
 
 There is a class of Raihvays and other w^orks 
 included among those placed by section 92 (sub- 
 sec. 10, a), under the exclusive control of the 
 Parliament of the Dominion, that is referred to 
 with some little ambiguity. The section reads 
 " Lines of tStoam or other shij^s. Railways, &:c., 
 connecting the Province with any othc r or others 
 of the Provinces, or extending heyomi the limits of 
 the Province r Pi is clear that the words " extend- 
 ing beyond the limits of the Province" cannot have 
 been intended to apply to works merely connect- 
 ing two adjacent Provinces, because they pre 
 described in the words immediately preceding 
 Nor, on the other hand, can they refer to any 
 
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 17 
 
 )urse was 
 >o-\ e men- 
 'ly v.'ithin 
 dominion, 
 ly ones of 
 ited upon 
 Id ajwear 
 cting the 
 ne rariia- 
 lifficulties 
 io long as 
 ton) from 
 ? running 
 and other 
 
 on 
 ay 
 
 jr works 
 92 (sub- 
 of the 
 ferred to 
 reads 
 rs, &c., 
 r others 
 limits of 
 extend- 
 not have 
 connect- 
 hey f>re 
 Bcedinj, 
 • to any 
 
 lailway or other work actually extending into a 
 foreign country, because, in the very nature of 
 things, no such power of extension can be con- 
 Terred by Canadian legislation. It would appear 
 therefore that these words mtist have reference 
 to such Railways, Telegraphs, or other works, 
 \s lead directly into a foreign country, such, for 
 example, as the Great "Western Railway, which 
 connects directly with the United States Railway 
 [system, both at the Niagara Falls Suspension 
 iBiidge, and also at Detroit, — the Buffalo and Lake 
 Iliiron Railway, connecting with United States 
 RaiUvays at ButFalo, — the Montreal and Cham- 
 l)lain Railway^ connecting at Rouse's Point with 
 the Vermont Central, &c. 
 
 Several bills were passed by Parliament, in the works of 
 Session of 186Y-8, relating to works of this class, {e^t^^lud 
 Vi-^. : — To amend the Act for the incori>oration of J" j'^g 
 ilie North-west Navigation and Railway Co. (a 
 Company empowered, among other things, to 
 navigate Lakes Huron and Superior witliin the 
 limits of Canada), — To confirm a By-law passed 
 ])y the Directors of the Lake Memphremagog 
 Navigation Company (whose steamers ply on a 
 lake partly within the territory of the United 
 States^, — To incorporate the Clifton Susj)ension 
 Bridge Co. (international), — and to authorize the 
 carrying of gas j)ii)es across the Ri\er Niagara, 
 in order to facilitate the liiyhtiniy of the Town of 
 
18 
 
 LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 miniot). 
 
 !li 
 
 Clifton with gas (international). As none of 
 these bills contained the "general advantage" 
 clause, it may be assumed that the construction 
 put by Parliament upor the provisions of the 
 Imperial Act in regard to bills of this class agrees 
 with that above suggested. 
 Companies There is another class of bills, concerning 
 bu8ines3° which scrious doubts have arisen in regard to 
 
 throughout ..-,... -, ., p ,^ ' !• 
 
 the 1)0' jurisdiction, namely, those lor the incorporation 
 of companies for the transaction of business of 
 any Idnd ikroughout the Dominion. Sub-section 
 11 (above quoted) assigns to the Provincial 
 Legislatures " the incorporation of companies 
 with Provincial objects." In the first Session of 
 the Parliament of th^ Dominion, several iietitions 
 were presented in reference to the incorporation, 
 &c., of Insurance and other private companies. 
 Upon two of these, praying respectively for the 
 incorporation of the Gore District Mulual Fire 
 Insurance Company, and of the Sorghum 
 Growers' Association of the County of Essex, 
 the Committee on Standing Orders (Commons) 
 reported, in each case, that in their opinion the 
 matter " came more proi)erly within the jurisdic- 
 tion of the Local Legislature of Ontario."* On 
 the other hand, petitions for the incorporation of 
 
 * 6th and 8th Reports of Committee on Standing Orders 
 (Commons), l^GT-S. 
 
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 19 
 
 5 none of 
 ivantage" 
 istruction 
 ns of the 
 ass agrees 
 
 )ncerning 
 regard to 
 rporation 
 isiness of 
 lb-section 
 Provincial 
 omi^anies 
 i^ssion of 
 petitions 
 poration, 
 mpanies. 
 " for the 
 nal Fire 
 
 orghum 
 Essex, 
 annions) 
 
 lion the 
 
 jurisdic- 
 * On 
 
 at ion of 
 
 he Merchants' Express Company of the Domin- 
 ion of Canada, — lor the incorporation of the Cana- 
 dian Lake Underwriters' Association, — and for 
 amending the Acts relating to the Canada "West 
 Farmers' Mutual and Stock Insurance Company, 
 and changing the name to the Canada Fai-mers' 
 Mutual Insurance Company, were reported upon 
 favorably, and bills, introduced upon them, were 
 passed, and became law.* Another petition, for 
 an Act to grant certain powers to the Civil 
 service Building and Savings Society, was re- 
 [)orted on favorably by the Standing Orders 
 Committee of each House, and a bill introduced 
 in the Commons. This bill was subsequently 
 referred to the Committee on Banking and Com- 
 merce, who, after discussing, in commiitee, the 
 jquestion 'of jurisdiction, presented a report to 
 the IIouLe, representing that " doubts had arisen 
 as to whether the objects sought to be obtained 
 by the promoters were not Provincial in their 
 character, and such as the Local Legislatvire is 
 exclusively empowered to deal with,"! and 
 soliciting instruction on the subject. A similar 
 proceeding took j^lace on the part of the Private 
 Bill Committee of the Senate, who presented a 
 
 g Orders 
 
 * 31 Vic, chaps. 90, 91 and 93. 
 
 t 5th Report of Commiitee on Banking and Commerce 
 (Commons), 18G7-8. 
 
[l!*| 
 
 llilli 
 
 Ml 
 
 IR'li! i 
 
 20 LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 report of a like nature in reference to a Bill to 
 
 incorporate the Intercolonial Insurance Com- 
 
 inquiry pauy.* A discussiou ensued upon the Report, 
 
 tion of ju- which resulted in the appointment of a com- 
 
 nadiction. j^^^^^g^ u ^^ inquire into and report to this House 
 
 on the classes of Acts for the incorporation of 
 private companies, which properly, under the 
 ' British North America Act, 1867,' come within 
 the jurisdiction of the Parliament of the Domin- 
 ion, and to act on behalf of this House as Mem- 
 bers of any Joint Committee of the Senate and 
 House of Commons, which may be ordered on 
 the subject." f No committee was appointed 
 on the part of the Commons, and no further steps 
 were taken with regard to either of the above 
 mentioned bills. 
 
 It was urged, on the part of the promoters of 
 these bills, that the companies to which they 
 related were desirous of transacting busmess in 
 different jparts of the Dominion, and were there- 
 fore in need of more extensive and general 
 powers than could be conferred upon them by a 
 Provincial Legislature, and, in short, that they 
 were not jiroi^erly of the class referred to in vSub- 
 section 11 of the Act, as " Companies with Pro- 
 vincial objects." Against this it was argued that 
 
 Status of 
 Provincial 
 corpor.t- 
 tious. 
 
 * Rcpoit of Committee on Standuig Orde^^ and Private 
 Bills (Senate), 5th Dec., 1867. 
 
 t Senate Journal, 12th Dec., 18G7. 
 
 :i i 
 
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 21 
 
 mess 111 
 
 fa rroviiicial Charter would suffice to ensure their 
 recognition in every Province whore their 
 jAgencies might be established ; m\d that under 
 [such a charter they could sue and be sued, and 
 transact all business of an ordinary character. 
 [in opposition to this view, a case was cited by 
 the Honorable Mr. Campbell, in the debate 
 in the Senate on the Bill to incorporate 
 the Intercolonial Insuranco Company, having 
 [an immediate bearing upon the question as 
 I to the status in one Province of a company in- 
 [corporated by the Legislature of another Pro- 
 hiiice. The case referred to was an action 
 jbrought, in the Court of King's Bench of Upper 
 Canada, by the Bank of Montreal, in the year 
 1836 (prior to the Union of Upper and Lower Case of 
 Canada), for the recovery of the amount of cer- Bank ve, 
 [tain promissory notes, the drawers and endorsers iste.""*^* 
 of which resided in Upper Canada. Th 3 Court 
 ruled that "a foreign corporation, such as a 
 [Bank, cannot maintain an action upon promis- 
 sory notes received and discounted by them 
 in the course of banking business in this Pro- 
 vince, although they may maintain an action 
 for money had and received to their use, against 
 the person for whom such notes were dis- 
 counted, and to whom money was advanced 
 upon them."* 
 
 • Bank of Montreal vs. Bethune, Hilary Term, 6 Wm. 4. 
 (See Robinson & Harrison's Digest, p. 123.) 
 
/' 
 
 ■ 
 
 22 LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 By this (leci^ion it would appear, that what- 
 ever status a company, owing its existence to a 
 Provincial Charter, may possess beyond the 
 * limits of its own Province, ihere are limitations 
 and restrictions which can only be obviated by 
 special legislation in each Province. Banking 
 Companies are, by the Act, placed under the 
 exclusive control of the Parliament of the Domin- 
 ion, and it may be found advisable, with a view 
 of meeting the difficulty, that all commercial 
 companies doing business of such a nature as to 
 require the establishment of agencies in the 
 difterent Provinces of the Dominion, should be 
 placed under the same jurisdiction. 
 
 Angell & Ames, in their " Treatise on the Law 
 of Private Corporations aggregate," (6th edition, 
 Sufunited Boston, 1858,) shcw (in treating on the powers 
 of foreign corporations, s. 372), that " a company, 
 claiming to be incorporated, has only to shew 
 that it has been regularly and effectually made a 
 corporate body, to enable it to sustain a suit 
 beyond the jurisdiction within which it is consti- 
 tuted." They cite the case of the Dutch "West 
 India Company, — that of the National Bank of 
 St. Charles, in Spain, and other analogous cases, 
 in which it was decided by the English Courts, 
 that a foreign corporation may maintain a suit in 
 England by their corporate name. In the United 
 States also, it is shewn (s. 373), that the power of 
 
 Foreign 
 corpora- 
 tions in 
 
 States. 
 
 a coil 
 I not ij 
 
 lofthl 
 
 jmay| 
 ling 
 
 liiii 
 
/' 
 
 lat what- 
 once to a 
 rond the 
 imitations 
 viated bv 
 Banking 
 nder the 
 le Domin- 
 th a view 
 mmorcial 
 ture as to 
 s in the 
 ihould be 
 
 the Law 
 
 edition, 
 
 powers 
 
 omj)any, 
 
 to shew^ 
 
 J made a 
 
 a suit 
 
 is consti- 
 
 3h West 
 
 Bank of 
 
 us cases, 
 
 Courts, 
 
 a suit in 
 
 United 
 
 )ower of 
 
 LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 a corporation to sue, in the respective States, is 
 I not restricted to companies created by t^ie laws 
 of the State in which the suit is instituted, but 
 I may be exercised by foreign corporations, belong- 
 |ing either to another State of the Confederacy, or 
 to a foreign country. It is, however, admitted 
 that this i)ower is exercised rather upon suffer- 
 ance than of right, as " the Legishiture vmdoubt- 
 edly has power to prohibit foreign corporations 
 (/. e., those not created by the laws of the State) 
 from contracting in the State ; but until it does 
 so, contracts so made will be enforced." (s. 374.) 
 But instances are given in which the i^ow^ers of 
 foreign corporations were restricted by the Courts 
 without such Legislative intervention. In Ohio, ^^^^ ^^ 
 the Court ru^ed (in re Bank of Marietta vs. Pin- Marietta 
 
 in Ohio. 
 
 dalf), that " though, as a general rule, a corpora- 
 tion created by the laws of one State might sue 
 in another, it would not he jtermitied to a Bank in 
 Ohio to establish an agency in Virginia for dis- 
 counting notes, or for carrying on any other 
 banking operations ; nor could they sustain an 
 action on any note thus acquired by them," 
 though they admitted " there was nothing in the 
 policy of the laws of Virginia which restrained 
 its citizens from borrowing money from a Bank 
 in Ohio," &c. It w^as also held, by the Suprem'e Decision of 
 Court of the State of New York, " that a foreign Supreme 
 
 ' => Court of 
 
 corporation, keeping an office in that State, for New York. 
 
ig r 
 
 24 LI.GISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 receiving" deposits and discounting notes, without Borne 
 being expressly authorized by the laws of that 
 State to do so, cannot maintain an action for the 
 money loaned." 
 
 These, it is true, are but rare and exceptional 
 cases, yet they (with that relating to the Montreal 
 Bank, before referred to), serve to shew that the 
 X^owers of a corporation, beyond the territorial 
 jurisdiction of the legislature creating it, are, in 
 fact, exercised by permission rather than right, 
 and are therefore svibject to restriction or curtail- 
 Diffcrence meut at any time. In considerins* what may be 
 
 between "' . . . '^ . -^ . 
 
 Constitu- the true iwsition of corporations created in this 
 Canada couutry uudcr Provincial authority, it is well to 
 s°ate?°^^** bear in mind the very important difference that 
 exists between the Constitution of the Dominion 
 of Canada and that of the United States in regard 
 to " State rights :" while, in the latter, the sove- 
 reignty of each State, in all matters of internal 
 policy, is distinctly recognized and admitted, and 
 all rights not expressly assigned by the constitu- 
 tion to the Federal Ciovernment are exercised 
 by the Sovereign State, — under the constitution 
 of Canada, the Sovereignty is expressly vested in 
 the Grovernment and Parliament of the Domin- 
 ion, who have exclusive control over all matters 
 not assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of 
 the Provinces (British North America Act, sec. 
 91, class 29). This can hardly fail to have 
 
 ■m 
 
 m. 
 
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 25 
 
 s, without 
 vs of that 
 yn for the 
 
 cceptional 
 1 Montreal 
 r that the 
 territorial 
 it, are, in 
 laii right, 
 or cnrtail- 
 at may be 
 3d in this 
 is well to 
 ence that 
 Dominion 
 in regard 
 the sove- 
 
 internal 
 itted, and 
 constitu- 
 exercised 
 istitution 
 vested in 
 e Domin- 
 1 matters 
 atures of 
 Act, sec. 
 
 to have 
 
 lome effect upon the datiis of Corporations hold- 
 [ng Provincial Charters, in any transactions they 
 
 Lay have beyond the limits of their own Pro- 
 rince. The Legisinture of Ontario, at their first 
 K'ssion, in incorporating the lloyal Canadian Royal 
 insurance Company, expressly restricted their ing"*n co, 
 Operations to risks " within the Provmce of (<^"tano)- 
 
 Ontario." Insurance business, like that of Banks, 
 not confined to a particular locality, but is 
 lecessarily si:>read over the country, and the 
 
 irf^er companies would probably desire to extend inaurance 
 
 ° 1 PI CoinpaniM. 
 
 leu' operations over the greater part of the 
 'ominion, and even beyond it (as regards 
 Marine Insurance) ; it is therefore of importance 
 them that their corporate powers should pro- 
 sed from the highest legislative authority in the 
 [iand. A Bill respecting Insurance Companies,* 
 passed in the first Session of the Parliament of 
 J,\inada, requires all such companies to obtain a 
 Lcence from the Minister of Finance, and to 
 Lvest a large proportion of their paid-up capital 
 Dominion Stock, and contains other provisions 
 ►r securmg the proper management of the 
 
 • At one stage of this bill an objection was made, that it 
 I'ftS beyond the jurisdiction of the House, which was over-ruled 
 
 Mr. Speaker; at another stage, a motion "that the regula- 
 lon of Insurance Companies is a subject properly within the 
 xriadiction of the Provincial Legislatures," was proposed and 
 kegatived. Com. Journal, 1867-8, pp. 161, 426. 
 3 
 
 .^K. 
 
26 
 
 Boarda of 
 Trade. 
 
 LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 companies. This attbrds an additional reason 
 why it is desirable that Insurance Companies 
 should be created by the same authority that 
 exercises over them such stringent control. 
 
 In the first Session of the Legislature of Ontario, 
 an Act was passed to incorporate the Guelph 
 Board of Trade. In the first Session of the Par- 
 liament of the Dominion, a bill was introduced 
 to incorporate the Stratford Board of Trade ; the 
 bill was referred to the Committee on Banking 
 and Commerce, and the question of jurisdiction 
 being raised in committee, the committee came 
 to the conclusion that thoucrh the Board to be 
 created was a local Board, the terms of the 91st 
 section of the " British America Act," in placing 
 "the Regulation of Trade and Commerce" under 
 the control of Parliament, justified the action of 
 this Legislature in the matter. In examining the 
 details of the bill, however, it was found to con- 
 tain provisions for the establishment of a Court 
 of Arbitration in commercial matters ; and as 
 "the constitutio :i, maintenance, and organization 
 of Provincial Courts, both of civil and criminal 
 jurisdiction," are, by the 92nd section of the said 
 Act assigned exclusively to the Provincial Legis- 
 latures, the committee expunged from the bill 
 so much as related to a Court of Arbitration, and 
 it was passed in the amended form. 
 
 It is much to be desired thai stej^s should be 
 
 aken 
 
 he q\ 
 
 >f the 
 
 nsull 
 
 mpei 
 
 As 
 
 ippoi 
 
 nterr 
 
 luly 
 
 jonsi( 
 
 nd s 
 
 dmer 
 
 odet 
 
 m ad 
 
 ng t 
 
 [mpe 
 
 An 
 
 been 
 
 dou 
 
 e dv 
 
 norit 
 
 cedei] 
 
 Nott 
 
 to th 
 
 looke 
 
 Parli: 
 
 with 
 
 Legii 
 
 publ: 
 
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION. 
 
 27 
 
 tial reason ■g^jjgj^ witliout delay to determine more accurately Settlement 
 
 "i • ■ of quos- 
 
 ^ompauit.'s Ij^Q question of jurisdiction, either by the action tions of 
 Lority that l^f i}^q Canadian Parliament, or, if that be deemed Uon. '^ 
 itrol. insullicient, by invoking the interposition of the 
 
 of Ontario, ■mperial Parliament, to pass an explanatory Act. 
 le Cruelphl ^g a preliminary step, it might be advisable to 
 )i the Parlppoiiit a committee (upon which the various 
 ntroduced Interests, Provincial and Dominional, should be 
 irade ; theWuly represented), for the purpose of carefully 
 I -banking Jjonsidering the whole question of jurisdiction, 
 Lirisdictioii fciid suggesting such amendments to the British 
 ittee came w^merica Act as may be found desirable, in order 
 >ard to be Mq determine doubtful points. Upon their report, 
 )1 the 91st ftji address to the Crown could be A'^oted, solicit- 
 in placing Bng the passage of an explanatory Act by the 
 mperial Parliament. 
 
 Another mode of meeting the difficulty has 
 been suggested, viz. : that each bill upon which 
 a doubt as to jurisdiction might be raised, should 
 e discussed, and the point decided ui^on its own 
 merits ; and that in this manner a series of pre- 
 cedents would be established for future guidance. 
 JSot to mention other objections that might exist 
 to this course, there is one that cannot be over- 
 looked, viz., that the legislation of the Dominion 
 Parliament cannot legally over-ride or interfere 
 with the rights and privileges of the Provincial 
 Legislatures, save in certain exceptional matters, as 
 public works, and education ; such powers as are 
 
 •ce" under 
 J action of I 
 nining the 
 nd to con- 
 )f a Court 
 s; and as 
 ganization 
 i criminal 
 ►f the said 
 Dial Legis- 
 Q the bill 
 ation, and 
 
 should b( 
 
28 LEOlSLATn^ .lURISDICTlON. 
 
 vested in the Local Legislature being (with those 
 exceptions) exrlimvehj assigned to them, any 
 proceeding or decision of Parliament upon a 
 matter in any way exceeding its jurisdiction, 
 instead of forming a precedent, will, in all i>roha- 
 bility, lead to the interposition of the Courts, and 
 perhaps involve endless litigation. It is there- 
 fore of the utmost importance, that any attempt 
 that may be made to deal with the question oi 
 jurisdiction, should be undertaken with duo 
 caution and deliberation. 
 
 
20 
 
 4.— rARLIAMENTARY AGENTS. 
 
 Ill the Imperial Parliament, every private bill 
 r petition must be solicited by a Parliair.entary Pariia- 
 Lgent, who conducts the bill through its various Agents^ 
 tnges, and is personally responsible to the House ""pfoyed 
 lid to the Speaker for the observance of the pJ^jSent 
 ules, orders, and practice of Parliament, and for 
 lie payment of all fees and charges : and no pro- 
 eeding upon any petition or bill can take place, 
 iiitil an appearance to act as the Parliamentary 
 
 gent upon the same shall have been entered in 
 
 le Private Bill Office.* This practice of em- 
 ploying Parliamentary Agents has been but re- 
 
 ently introduced in Canada, and it has not Not obu- 
 hitherto been made obligatory, though the in- Canada*." 
 crease of business may possibly render it desirable 
 to adopt some such course, in order that mem- 
 bers may be relieved from a duty that is often 
 inconvenient and embarras.*^' ng, and frequently 
 involves a sacrifice of tiuK and trouble, which 
 should not in fairness be expected of them. 
 
 * May, p. 655. 
 
"30 
 
 PARLIAMENTARY AGENTS. 
 
 In the revised code of Rules prepared by the 
 late Sir Henry Smith (then Speaker), and adopt- 
 ed by the Assembly of 1860, provision wa? made 
 for tlio recognition of Parliamentary Agents, 
 qualifying, who had up to that time acted in a private and 
 irresj^onsible capacity. No person is now per- 
 mitted to Act as Parliamentary Agent, without the 
 express sanction and authority of the Speaker.* 
 This having been obtained, he is required to 
 sign a declaration before the Chief Clerk of the 
 Private Bill Office, engaging to observe and obey 
 all the Eules of the House, and to pay all fees 
 and charges, when demanded, and further, to 
 enter into a recognizance in $2,000 (if required at 
 any future time by the Speaker) conditioned to 
 observe such declaration. His name is then 
 registered in a book, and he is entitled to act as 
 a Parliamentary Agent, but is liable to an abso- 
 lute or temporary prohibition to practise (at the 
 pleasure of the Speaker), for any wilful violation 
 of the Rules and practice of Parliament, or of any 
 rules prescribed by the Speaker. Membersf 
 
 Dl^qualifi 
 cations. 
 
 mg 
 
 * 73rd and 74th Rules, Commons. 
 
 t The House of Commons of Great Britain, by a Resolution 
 of the 26th February, 1830, declared, nem. con., *' That it is 
 contrary to the law and usage of Parliament that any Member of 
 this House should be permitted to engage, either by himself or 
 any partner, in the management of private blls before this or the 
 
PARLIAMENTARY AGENTS. 
 
 81 
 
 L by the 
 d adopt- 
 as made 
 
 Agents, 
 rate and 
 ow per- 
 hout the 
 peaker.* 
 uired to 
 k of the 
 lid obey 
 ' ail fees 
 rther, to 
 juired at 
 ioned to 
 
 is then 
 to act as 
 an abso- 
 (at the 
 
 iolation 
 >r of any 
 
 mbersf 
 
 Resolution 
 That it is 
 
 tlember of 
 iinself or 
 
 his or the 
 
 and Officers of the House* are alike disqalified 
 for Parliamentary Agency. 
 
 The name and place of residence of the ParUa- ftegisi/a- 
 
 ^ ^ ^ tion of 
 
 mentary Agent soHciting a biUare entered in the Agents. 
 Private Bill Register, in which are also recorded 
 all the proceedings, from the petition to the pass- 
 ing of the bill. This book is op3n to jmblic in- 
 spection.! 
 
 The Rules relating lo Parliamentary Agents 
 belong only to tLe House of Commons, no regu- 
 lations having been adopted by the Senate on this 
 subject. 
 
 It is usual for the Member who presents the Members 
 petition to take charge of the bill through its dif- 
 ferent stages. I 
 
 other House of Parliament, for a pecuniary reward." Commons 
 Journ. (G. B.), 1830, p. 107. 
 
 One of the Sessional Orders of the Canadian House of Com- 
 mons also declaies " that the offer of any money or other advan- 
 tage to any Member of the House of Commons, for the promot- 
 ing of any matter whatsoever, depending or to be trar.sacted in 
 the Parliumtnt of the Dominion of Canada, is a Ligh crime and 
 misdemeanor, and tends to the subversion of the Conatiiution. 
 Commons Journ., 1867~S, p. 6. 
 
 * In the Imperial Parliament, in compliance with the recom- 
 mendation of a Select Committee on the House of Commons 
 Offices in 1835, no officer or clerk belonging to the establish- 
 ment is allowed to transact private business before the House, for 
 his emolument or advantage, either directly or indirectly. May, 
 p. 656. 
 
 t 71st Rule. 
 
 X Sherwood on 1 rivate Bills^ p. 29 
 
"■'/"'('H'V>7-' ■■'.'■'■'■ '^^■' 
 
 82 
 
 jl 1 
 
 5.— rETITIONS FOE PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 Every Pri- Evcry private bill is based on a petition,* 
 based on a whicb sbould state, in general terms, the objects 
 petition. ^^ privileges sought to be obtained by the parties 
 soliciting the bill, and be signed by the parties 
 themselves (the signatures of agents r j ^lalf of 
 others being inadmissable, except in case of inca- 
 pacity by sickness) ; and at least one signature 
 should be on the same sheet on which the peti- 
 tion is written.! The petition is presented by a 
 "°7ed." Member in his place. | Petitions should bc^ pre- 
 pared in triplicate, one copy being pres* nted in 
 each Houie by a Member, and a third addressed 
 to the Governor General in Council, through the 
 Secretary of State. (A form of petition to ea' 1 
 branch of the Legislature will be found in i 
 
 * 56tli Rule. Bills relating to local improvements are oc, 
 casionally brought iu, in the Imperial Parliament, by order, 
 without a petition, but are subsequently dealt with as private 
 bills, as regards proof of compliance with standing oriers, &c. 
 May, p. 661. 
 
 t May, p. 509. 
 
 t 85th Kule, Commons. 
 
 llii 
 
PETITIONS. 
 
 SS 
 
 .LS. 
 
 iition,* 
 
 objects 
 
 parties 
 
 parties 
 
 xalfof 
 
 of inca- 
 
 ^nature 
 
 e peti- 
 
 d by a 
 
 >3 pre- 
 
 ited in 
 
 ressed 
 
 gh the 
 
 o ea' ' 
 
 in T 
 
 are oc. 
 >y order, 
 
 private 
 ers, &CC. 
 
 Appendix. No. III.) In 1859 a Bill to incorpo- P^'^s which 
 
 * ^ ' had not 
 
 rate the Cluelph and AYellington Koads Company, been based 
 was sent down by the Legislative Council, and tion. 
 was subsecjuently referred to the Committee on 
 Private Bills, who finding that it was not found- 
 ed on a petition, reported that the i^reamble was 
 not proved. In 1862, a Bill to separate the town- 
 shijp of Broughtoi- from the County of Megantic, 
 and to annex it to the County of Beauce, which 
 had been introduced as a public bill (under a 
 public title), was referred to the committee, who 
 reported that it was not based on a petition, and 
 could not therefore be treated as a private bill ; 
 and no further jiroceeding was taken on the bill 
 by the House. 
 
 The petition must be presented within the Time of 
 first three weeks of the Session.* It was former- [j^oT"**' 
 ly the custom to extend this time, by Resolution, 
 to a very late period of the Session, but the in- 
 jurious tendency of such an extension has become 
 so evident, from the necessity it frequently in- 
 volves of dispensing with those formalities which 
 are so necessary for the protection of private 
 rights, that of late years there has been evinced 
 an increasing unwillingness to extend the period. 
 "While in 1858, it was extended to 85 days from 
 the commencement of the Session ; in 1859 rnd 
 
 49th Rule. 
 
li M 
 
 34 
 
 After expi 
 ration of 
 time. 
 
 PETITIONS. 
 
 1860, it was extended to G3, and in 1861 to 36 
 days only; the latter being* but 15 days beyond 
 the time fixed by the Rule. In 1867-8, an ad- 
 jonrnirentfrom December to March having been 
 determined upon, the time for receiving x^etitions 
 was extended to three weeks after the re-assem- 
 bling of Parliament, and subsequently to the end 
 of the then current month. 
 
 When the time has actually expired, parties 
 are at hberty to present a petition, asking leave 
 to introduce their petition for a private bill not- 
 withstanding such expiry, and explaining the 
 circumstances under which they have been pre- 
 vented from complying with the orders of the 
 House.* It is competent then to the House, 
 either to grant the requisite permission upon 
 motion,! or, in accordance with the practice in 
 the Imperial Parliament,^ to refer the matter to 
 the Standing Orders Committee, and take action 
 upon their report. In 1866, the House extended 
 the time in favor of a particular application only.§ 
 
 ■ i 
 
 * Niagara Harbour and Dock Co., 1851; Randall Estate, 
 1852-3 5 Brockville and Ottawa Railway, 1863 (Feh.Scss.); 
 Ottawa and French River communication, 1863 (Aug. Sess.) 
 See also Sherwood on Private Bills, pp, 10, 23. 
 
 t Assembly Journ., 1832-3, p. 347; 1863 (Feb. Sess.), pp. 
 320, 326. 
 
 t May, p. 669. 
 
 § Cobourg nnd Peterboro' Railway, 1866. 
 
35 
 
 6.— PROOP OF NOTICES, 
 
 iJEFORE COMMITTEE ON STANDING ORDERS. 
 
 All petitions for private bills, when received by Examina- 
 tion of 
 the House, are taken into consideration (without petitions 
 
 special reference) by the Committee on Standing Jl^Verence. 
 Orders, whose duty it is to ascertain whether the 
 Rule of the House in regard to the x)ublication of 
 notice has been complied with in each case, and 
 to report to the House the result of their in- 
 quiries ; together with any recommendation that 
 may appear to them desirable in cases where the 
 notice may prove in any respect informal or in- 
 sufficient.* The committee has no power to in- 
 quire into the merits of any such petition, this 
 being a duty which pertains to the Private Bill 
 Committee in considering the preamble of the 
 bUl.t 
 All private bills from the Senate (not beinc- Private 
 
 , , . . ^ * BUl3 from 
 
 based on a petition already so reported on) are Senate ex- 
 amined. 
 
 • 53rd Rule. 
 
 t Alpheua Todd's Report on Private Bills, 1847. 
 
 \ 
 
m 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 ! i 
 
 ^llil 
 
 taken into consideration and reported upon by the 
 committee after the first reading * 
 
 In 1862, the Legislative Assembly (in pursu- 
 ance of a recommendation of the Standing Orders 
 Committee in their 10th Report) appointed the 
 Examiner Chief Clerk of the Private Bill Office their " Ex- 
 
 for Stand - 
 
 ing Orders, amiucr for Standing Orders," assigning to him 
 the duty of examining into the facts with regard 
 to the notice given on each petition, and report- 
 ing the same for the infcrmation of the Committee 
 on Standing Orders ; and the practice is contm- 
 ued under the new arrangements since Confed- 
 eration. The committee are then enabled, upon 
 the evidence reported to them, to decide upon 
 each case. This corresponds with the course 
 taken in the Imi^erial Parliament ;f it has been 
 adopted, as yet, only by the Lower House, and is 
 a step towards the assimilation of our Canadian 
 practice to that of the two Houses of the Imperial 
 Parliament for the joint proof of their Standing 
 Orders.J 
 
 * 54th Rule. Toronto Boys' Home, 1861 ; Huron College, 
 1863 (Fib. Sess.) ; London and Canadian Loan and Agency Co., 
 1863 (Aug. S3S3.) ; Niagara District Bank, 1867-8. 
 
 t Bristowe, pp. 10, 77. 
 
 t In 1854: the Lord3 adopted a most convenient arrangement 
 which dispensed with a double proof of the Orders common to 
 both Houses ; they resolved on the appointment of examiners for 
 Standing Orders for their Lordships' House, and appointed the 
 
PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 37 
 
 Ali questions arising- in the committee are de- froceed- 
 oided by a majority of voices ; the chairman committee? 
 voting only when there is an eqn ' Ity of voices. 
 In committees on private bills, the chairman votes 
 as a member, and has also a second or castiui*- 
 vote when the votes are equal ; but this power 
 is specially conferred by a Standing Order of the 
 House ;* such is also the case in Election Com- 
 i*:"ttees, as regulated by statute ; but as regards 
 other committees, in the absence of any special 
 power, it is contrary to the practice of Parlia- 
 ment, f 
 
 The Standing' Orders Committee usually ap- sitting of 
 [point certain days for sitting, in the Private Bill ''°™™*"^®* 
 Office, when such petitions for private bills as 
 [have been received by the House, are laid before 
 [them. In cases where there is any doubt as to 
 
 ame geatlemea who held the office of ExamL ers of petitions in 
 House of Commoas, who were thus enabled to take the evi- 
 dence on the part of both Houses simultaneously : and in cases 
 [where any of the Orders have not been complied with, the Stand- 
 ng Orders Committee in each House determines, upon the facts 
 eported by them, whether the same ought or ought not to be 
 ispensed with. "Of all the improvements," says May, " con- 
 ected with Private Bill legislation, none have been so signal as 
 hose in which both Houses have concurred for the assimilation 
 ^_nd joint proof of their standing C"der.?." May, pp. Qi6, 646. 
 * 63rd Rule, 
 t May, p. 385. 
 4 
 
 M 
 
38 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 the sufficiency of the notice, the promoter* of a 
 petition appear before the committee, to produce 
 such evidence as they may desire to ofler. 
 Notices re- While the requirements of the standing orders 
 EDgiand, of the Lords and Commons, reiathig* to private 
 bills, involve notices in various forms, and the 
 dei:>ositing of plans, estimates, and other docu- 
 ments in some cases,* those of our Canadian 
 Legislature (see Appendix I.) embrace (in all but 
 Divorce cases) but one i'orm of notice, viz., by ad- 
 In Canada, vertisemcut inserted in the Canada (gazette, and 
 also in some newspaper published in any locality 
 that may be affected by the proposed scheme, 
 clearly and distinctly specifying the nature and 
 object of the application ; if the matter relate 
 specially to the Province of Quebec, it must be 
 published both in English and French. This 
 notice must be continued, not less than once a 
 week, for a period of two months, during the in- 
 terval of time between the close of the preceding 
 Session and the consideration of the petition by 
 the committee. In the case of a proposal to erect 
 
 * They are arranged in the following order: — 1. Notices byl 
 advertisement. 2. N<^ticea and applications to owners, lessees,! 
 and occupiers of lands and houses. 3- Documents required tc| 
 be deposited, and the times and places of deposit. 4. Form irl 
 which plans, books vif reference, sections and cross sections shal' 
 be prepared. 5. Estimates and deposit of money and declara 
 tions in certain cases. May, p. 644. 
 
PKOOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 89 
 
 a toll bridge, the notice must state the rates of 
 toll to be demanded, the extent of the exclusive 
 privilege, the height of the arches, the interval 
 between the abutments of piers for the passage 
 of rafts and vessels, and, when it is intended to 
 construct a draw-bridge, the dimensions of the 
 same* 
 
 When the application is for a Bill of Divorce, in Divorce 
 the notice is required by the Standing Orders of 
 the Senate (see Appendix 11.) to be published 
 during six months in the Canada Gazette, and in 
 two newspapers published in the District (in 
 Quebec), or County or Union of Counties (in the 
 other Provinces), where the applicant resides.f 
 A copy of such notice in writing must also be 
 served on the person from whom such Divorce is 
 sought, if the residence of such person can be 
 ascertained ; and proof on oath of such service 
 (or of the attempts made to effect the same), must 
 be adduced before the Senate on the reading 
 of the petition.l An exemplification of all pro- 
 ceedings that may have been had in any Court 
 of Law, duly certified, must be presented at the 
 same time.§ And in all cases where damages 
 have been awarded to the applicant, proof on 
 
 • 51st and 52nd Rules, 
 t 73rd Rule, Senate. 
 t 74th Rule, Senate. 
 § 75th Rule, Senate. 
 
(!' 
 
 I 
 
 40 
 
 rilOOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 Certain 
 applica- 
 tions ex 
 
 oath must be adduced that such damages have 
 been levied and retained, or such explanation 
 afforded for the nej^lect or inability to levy the 
 same under a writ of execution, as may appear 
 sufficient excuse for such omission.* 
 
 The various notices required by the Kules of 
 the two Houses having been thus referred to, it 
 empt from ghould be mentioned that they do not apply to 
 all applications for private bills, indiscriminately, 
 but to such only as involve the granting of ex- 
 clusive rights or privileges, or a possible inter- 
 ference with the rights or interests of other 
 parties.! Thus petitions for the incorporation 
 of religious, benevolent, social, literary, or educa- 
 tional institutions or associations,! for the na- 
 turalization of aliens, § for some individual or 
 personal advantage not of an exclusive charac- 
 
 II 
 
 * Y6th Rule, Senate. 
 
 t 5l3t Rule (both Houses). 
 
 t Toronto House of Industry, 1852-3 ; St. Mary's College, 
 1852-3} German Evangelical Church incorporation, 1854-5; 
 Canadian Order of Odd Fellows, 1856 ; Woodstock Literary In- 
 stitute, 1857; Montreal St. Andrew's Society, 1858; Toronto 
 Horticultural Society, 1860 ; Montreal Skating Club, 1861 ; To- 
 ronto Savings Bank, 1861; Montreal Natural History Society, 
 1862; Toronto Club, 1863; Humane Society of B.N.Am., 
 1864; St. Catharines Hospital, 1865; London Board of Trade, | 
 1866. 
 
 § Chaffee's naturalization, 1857 ; Steckel's naturalization, 
 1857. In the case of De Stoecklia's naturalization (1860), and 
 
 ter,* 
 been 
 from 
 appli 
 whei 
 the r 
 Te 
 comri 
 whic 
 ving 
 or th 
 right 
 tend 
 they 
 requ 
 prov: 
 tec til 
 
 Roger 
 was re 
 Gazet 
 
 • M 
 tawaS 
 
 t W 
 of tim 
 (reduc 
 road ( 
 Cartie 
 Trade 
 
 t I 
 amenc 
 Bank 
 
PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 n 
 
 ges have 
 
 planation 
 
 levy the 
 
 ly appear 
 
 Kules of 
 •red to, it 
 
 apply to 
 minately, 
 iig of ex- 
 ble iuter- 
 of other 
 rporation 
 or educa- 
 r the na- 
 ddual or 
 e charac- 
 
 y'a College, 
 )n, 1854-5 ; 
 Literary In- 
 18 } Toronto 
 b, 1861 ; To- 
 iory Society, 
 B. N. Am., 
 rd of Trade, 
 
 ituralization, 
 (1860), and 
 
 ter,* or for objects of a like nature, have usually 
 been reported upon by the committee as exempt 
 from the necessity of such notice ; as have also 
 applications for amendment of existing charters, 
 when such amendment does not interfere witli 
 the rights of shareholders or others.f 
 
 Petitions have occasionally come before the provision 
 committee, seeking certain powers or privileges, l^^^l' *° 
 which, though not " exclusive" or directly in vol- "*°*J*^ 
 ving (in the words of the 51st Rule) " any matter 
 or thing which in its operation would affect the 
 rights or property of other parties," might yet 
 tend incidentally to affect the same. In such cases 
 they have generally reported that notice was not 
 required (vmder the terms of the E-ule), but that 
 provision should be made in the Bill for duly pro- 
 tecting all existing rights, &c. ; X it then becomes 
 
 Rogers' do. (1866), a suspension of the Rule relative to notice 
 was recommended ; and in those of Sanford and Rogers (1802) a 
 Gazette notice was reported as sufficient. 
 
 * Mercer's relief, 1859; Foe's change of name, 1862; Ot- 
 tawa Sisters of Charity (power to mortgage their property), 1863. 
 
 t Montreal Cemetery Co., 1852-3; Niagara Bank (extension 
 of time for paying up stock), 1857 ; Eastern Townships Bank 
 (reduction of capital), 1858 ; Port Whitby & Lake Huron Rail- 
 iroad Co. (do.), 1859; Toronto Cotton Mills Co., 1862; Jacques 
 Cartier Bank, 1863; Merchants' Bank, 1864; Hamilton Board of 
 Trade, 1866 ; London do., 1867-8. 
 
 t Piatt Estate, 1858 ; Montreal and Champlain Railroad 
 amendment, 1860 ; Guelph debt consolidation, IBGO ; Montreal 
 Bank amendment, 1861, &c. 
 
42 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 Evidenco 
 of publi- 
 city, when 
 
 !!! 
 
 i!i! 
 
 the duty of the Committee on Private Bills (or 
 other committee of a like character), when the 
 bill comes before them, to see that it contains such 
 a provision, before they report it to the House.* 
 In the fullllmeiit of their duty of examining 
 into the notices g-iyen by the i^romoters of private 
 bills in compliance with the 51st and o2nd Uules, 
 no notice is the Committee on Standing Orders have ffener- 
 
 giren. . 
 
 ally been guided rather by the spirit than the 
 letter of the requirement. In every case where 
 the formal notice proves to have been insufficient, 
 or to have been omitted altogether, they have 
 admitted evidence to shew that all j)arties whose 
 interests may be affected by the matter in ques- 
 tion, have been fully inforuK ^ of the intention to 
 apply to Parliament. In ad ing the propriety 
 of such a distinction in the interpretation of the 
 Rules, it must nevertheless be remembered that 
 parties at a distance who may be aware of an exist- 
 ing informality, may be led to suppose that it will 
 be fatal to the measure, and may therefore neg- 
 lect to take any steps to oppose it, relying upon 
 the House to carry out its own Standing Orders. 
 This has, in fact, been the case m several instances, 
 and a knowledge of it generally acts upon the 
 committee in exercising their judgment as to the 
 admissability of evidence of this kind. When the 
 committee have become satisfied in this manner 
 
 64th Rule. 
 
 
PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 48 
 
 Icoucerninn: a notice thus technically dofoctive or inforai»i- 
 
 I '^ •' ily waived, 
 
 linformal, they have in some instances taken npon in ceruin 
 themselves to waive the informality, and to rc- 
 p'^rt the notice as sufTicient. Thus, publication 
 of the proceedings at a pu))lic meeting called to 
 
 [consider a certain question, or some other i^ublic 
 notice,* discussions in reference thereto in a City 
 Council, reported in the local papers,! or service 
 of notice on the shareholders of a company in- 
 dividually, or evidence of the knowledge or con-, 
 sent of parties aHected,| have been held to be a 
 suflicient substitute for the notice required by the 
 Kulo. They have dispensed with the local notice 
 in a matter affecting a remote and unsettled part 
 of the country,^ also in the incorporation of 
 Insurance Companies, || or Bank.*;,^ and in other 
 
 • Three Rivera Diocese Church Rate, 1852-3 ; Jolietto in- 
 corporation, 1853 J Bruce County Town, 1864. 
 
 t Montreal Corporation amendment, 185Gj Montreal City 
 Passenger Railway, 1861 ; Toronto incorporation amendment, 
 1862; Quebec Corporation, 1864. 
 
 X Hamilton Hotel Co., 1856; Upper Canada Bank, 1862; 
 Brockville & Ottawa Railway, 1863 ; Woodstock Literary In- 
 stitute, 1864; Ottawa & Preacott Railway, 1865; McDougall 
 Estate, 1865 ; Bruce By-law, 1866 ; St. Lawrence Tow Boat 
 Co., 1866; Merchants' Bank, 1867-8. 
 
 § Huron Copper Bay Co., 1849; Sault St. Marie C"nal, 
 1852-3. 
 
 II British America Fire and Life Assurance Co., 1852-3, &c. 
 
 1[ Royal Bank of Canada, 1861, Ac. 
 
44 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 !ii 
 
 !li 
 
 matters not affecting any particular locality.* 
 They have also dispensed with notice in the 
 Official Gazette in applications of a purely local 
 nature, t and with the French local notice in a 
 ' matter relating to the Eastern Townships of 
 Lower Canada,t and the English local notice in 
 one affectmg a poi^ulation of French origin. § 
 Suspension The above cases must however be considered 
 rekUve to ^s altogether exceptional ; while the committee 
 may, in their discretion, interpret the Rules in 
 the most liberal sense, they have no power to 
 dispense with the formalities required by the 
 House. "VYhen, after due examination, they con- 
 sider it desirable to relax these formalities in any 
 particular case, they report the facts to the House, 
 and recommend a suspension of the Rule. The 
 principal grounds upon which a suspension has 
 been recommended may be thus stated : — Evi- 
 dence of consent of parties interested, || — That 
 
 notice. 
 
 ir 
 
 • In companies of this nature, whose business is general 
 rather than local, it is customary, when an amendment of their 
 Charter is asked, to publish a local notice (in addition to that in 
 the Official Gazette) in a newi?t>aper circulating at the seat of 
 their chief place of business. 
 
 t Iroquois School Section, 1858; Moulton Division, 1859; 
 Cobourg Manufacturing Co., 18o9; Burford Survey, 1860 ; Fitz- 
 roy Survey, 1863 ; Becancour Bridge, 1863 ; Fabriques Mutual 
 Assurance, 1865. 
 
 t Iberville, Brome, Shefford, and Missisquoi Road, 1857. 
 
 § Juliette Mining Co., 1857; Tring Municipality, 1863. 
 
 II Gait Estate, 1860 ; La Banque du People stock increase, 
 
 all 
 
 suffil 
 
 the 
 
 gen( 
 
 a 11 
 
 b 
 
 Ith 
 
 U T 
 befo 
 
locality.* 
 in the 
 ■^ly local 
 •tice in a 
 ships of 
 notice in 
 
 usidered 
 >inniittee 
 Kules in 
 )ower to 
 by the 
 hey con- 
 s in any 
 3 House, 
 [e. The 
 sion has 
 I :— Evi- 
 I —That 
 
 s general 
 it of their 
 to that in 
 ie seat of 
 
 ^, 1859 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICED. 
 
 ill parties have signed the petition,* — or are 
 [sufficiently apprized of the application,! — That 
 (the petition (in matters of a local nature) is very 
 Igenerally signed,t — That no private rights will 
 [be interfered with,§ — Proceedings in reference 
 th'^reto at a public meeting, || or in City Councils,^ 
 I — That the notice w^ill have fully matured 
 before any action can be taken on the bill by the 
 
 1861; Beauhariiois Presbyterian Cong., 1861; Grand Trucrk 
 Railway, 18G2 ; Bumble's relief, 1863; St. Thomas Debentures, 
 1864; McCallum's relief, 1865; Bar of L. Canada, 1866. 
 
 • Benson Estate, 1857 ; Cobourg Harbour Debentures, 1858 ; 
 N. Halifax boundary line, U59; McKay's will, 1861 ; Kingston 
 Marine iliilway, 1863; Iberville • Academy, 1864; York 
 Roads, 1865; Aylmer Parish, 1866. 
 
 t London and Port Stanley Railway (sale of land), 1858; 
 Rouville division, 1859 ; Cobourg and Peterboro' Railway, 1862 ; 
 Saguenay Municipality, 1863; Montreal Corporation, 1865. 
 
 t Mitchell incorporation, 1857 ; Charlevoix Registry Otfice, 
 1853 ; Vcspra and Sunnidale separation, 1859 ; Waterloo regis- 
 tration division, 1862; King Township Treasurer, 1863; Ya- 
 maska Bridge, 1864. 
 
 § Woodstock Woollen and Cotton Manufacturing Co., 1860; 
 Northern Railway amendment, 1860 ; South Eastern Mining Co., 
 1861 ; Huguenin's admission as notary, 1861 ; Crevier's relief, 
 1863; Knowlton Cemetery, 1865 ; Canadian Rubber Co., 1866 ; 
 Clifton Gps Works, 1807-8. 
 
 II Napanee incorporation, i857; C?.yuga Market block, 1863; 
 Port Hope By-law, 1365; Church of England Synod, 1866. 
 
 IT Montreal incorporation aineudment, 1854-5; Quebec 
 Police, 1857; Toronto Street Railway, 1861; Hamilton Debt, 
 1863. 
 
 45. 
 
I I 
 
 iill ! - 
 
 46 ' PKOOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 Private Bill Committee,* — That the measure is 
 one of great urgency,! or of great public utility! 
 or importance,! — That the notices were given 
 for the previous Session, which was closed pre- 
 maturely,§ — That Bank Charters have not here-] 
 tofore been treated as private bills in New 
 Brunswick, II — ajid even, in one or two instances,' 
 on the ground that a petition had been presented 
 against the proposed bill, which appears to have 
 been considered as evidence that its opj)onents 
 were svifficiently informed of the application. 
 
 In recommending a su.spension of the Rule, 
 however, when no sufficient notice has been 
 given, the committee have suggested that certain 
 matters of detail, which they considered to 
 require notice, should not be included in the 
 bill.t 
 
 Up to the year 1856, it was occasionally the 
 
 in ' 
 
 * Durham separation, 1860; Petroleum Springs Road Co., 
 IHGl ; St. Hyacinthe corporation, 1863 ; Lincoln County town, 
 186G. 
 
 t Hamilton debt consolidation, 1861 ; Oxford Seed Grain, 
 1863; Napanee Municipality, 1865. 
 
 X Transmundane Telegraph Co., 1859 ; St. Lawrence Navi- 
 gation Co., 1861 ; North West Navigation and Railway Co., 
 1862. 
 
 § Dereham Drainage, 1863; Niagara &, Detroit Railway, 
 1865. 
 
 II Fredericton Bank, 1867-8. 
 
 IT Stanstead, Shefford & Chambly Railway, 1863. 
 
=# 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 47 
 
 practice for the House to suspend, in a particular 
 [case, the Kulc relative to Notice, vpou a motion ^^^'"S" 
 [to that effect, without any previous action on the ^^^""*"^_ 
 hiart of the Standing Orders Committee ; but in ed. 
 that year the committee made a report, repre- 
 senting that the practice of indiscriminately dis- 
 pensing with these notices must have a most 
 injurious tendency, and suggesting that in future 
 no motion for susi:)ending the Kule in any special 
 case be passed, until the matter in question should 
 have been favorably reported on by the com- 
 mittee ; this being acceded to by the House, 
 was acted upon for the remainder of that Session. 
 A similar recommendation made in the following 
 year, was modified by the House so as to provide 
 that no motion for suspending the Rule in favor 
 of any petition be entertained, until the com- 
 mittee shall have reported on the subject, favor- 
 ably or otherwise ; and this is now provided for 
 in the 55th Rule. 
 
 When, in any case, the notice, upon examina- insufficimt 
 tion, proves to be insufficient, it is so reported to be report- 
 the House, and (unless accomj^anied by a recom- * " 
 mendation to suspend the Rule) all further action 
 in the matter is dropped ; the decision of the 
 committee being rarely oven aled by the House.* 
 One case is recorded in the Journals of the 
 
 • May, p. 6.33. 
 
■tOOi 
 
 I: !ii 
 
 ! I 
 
 lil 
 
 
 II 
 
 ill 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 It' 
 
 
 111 
 
 iliiH 
 
 48 
 
 "Notice 
 must bo 
 specific 
 
 ■ and clear. 
 
 Gait and 
 
 Guelph 
 
 Railway. 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 Assembly, in which the committee having 
 reported the notice incomplete, recommended 
 that it be not dispensed with. The House never- 
 theless suspended the Rule, and referred the 
 petition back to the committee, who subsequently 
 reported favorably, and a bill was mtroduced.* 
 In judging" as to the sufficiency of a notice 
 submitted for their examination, the committee 
 compare its terms with those of the petition, and 
 any important variance or omission in the T >rmer 
 is fatal either to the whole measure, or to a parti- 
 cular provision therein, as the case may be. In 
 some instances the notice (though published in 
 the prescribed manner in other respects) has 
 been unfavorably reported on because it did not 
 sufficiently indicate the objects sought to be 
 attained, f This was the case with a petition 
 for an amendment to the Act incorporating the 
 Gralt and Gruelph Railway Company in 1858 ; on 
 examining the petition, the amendment was 
 found to embrace a provision for giving the 
 holders of certam bonds issued by the company 
 before mortgaging their road to the Great 
 Western Railway Company, a remedy against 
 the last mentioned company, and this not having 
 been mentioned in the notice, it was pronounced 
 
 * Huntingdon Plank Road Co., 1846. 
 t St. Lambert Municipality, 1861. 
 

 having 
 iimended 
 ise nerer- 
 rred the 
 sequcntly 
 'oduced.* 
 a notice 
 ommittee 5 
 tion, and 
 le ^'rmer 
 o a parti- 
 f be. In 
 lished in 
 icts) has 
 t did not 
 it to be 
 petition 
 iting the 
 L858; on 
 3nt was 
 ing th<^ 
 company 
 e Great 
 against 
 t having 
 lounced 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 49 
 
 ins^friTiciont.* In another instance,! upon an 
 api)lication for amendments to th(. Act dividing JJ^y'^g^*'" 
 Chatham into two municipalities, the notice 
 simply referred to the Act, as 19 & 20 Vic, cap, 
 105, without mentioning the subject, and this 
 was pronounced insufficient. In the same Ses- 
 sioji, the committee called the attention of the 
 House (in one of their reports) to the utter insuf- 
 ficiency of a notice given in this form, and recom- 
 mended '• that in future, no notice be considered 
 sufficient that does not clearly indicate the nature 
 and subject of the application." % This recom- 
 mendation has been acted upon by the committee 
 ever since ; and in 1862 the (51st) Hule Avas so 
 amended as to require every notice to be of this 
 character. 
 
 If the notice be found too general in its terms, Petitioners 
 or if no mention be made of certain matters within the 
 included in the petition which require a specific tho^^oUce. 
 notice, the facts are 'specially reported, and the 
 promoters restricted, in the details of the bill, 
 
 * la a sub3e:iuent report, five weeks later, the conimit*ee 
 stated that the noiice had since been amended, and advertised 
 in its amended form for three weeks ; and they recommended 
 that the Rule be suspended : this was done accordingly, and a 
 bill presented, bat it was not proceeded with. 
 
 t Chatham division, I860. Also, Murray gravel roads, 1862 ; 
 
 Colborne gravel roads, 1862. 
 
 X Assembly Journ., I860, p. 126. 
 5 
 
50 
 
 mOOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 liii^ 
 
 ii;! 
 
 w 
 
 m 
 
 I'li I 
 
 III 
 
 i 
 
 Peel Manu- 
 facturing 
 Co. 
 
 Exception, within the terms of the notice ;* or if the matters 
 so omitted are allowed to be inserted in the bill, 
 due provision is made therein for the protection 
 of all parties whose rights might be affected by 
 the want of a specific notice. f If the notice 
 has been given in one County or District only, 
 the operations of the j)etitioners are confined to 
 that locality. I 
 
 In 1865, in reporting on the petition of the 
 Peel Greneral Manufacturing Company, for cer- 
 tain amendments to their charter, the committee 
 stated that the notice was sufficient for ordinary 
 amendments, but called the attention of the 
 House to one of a peculiar nature, under which 
 shareholders in the company might claim a 
 relaxation of the Patent Laws in favor of their 
 own iuA^entions, when intended to be used in 
 connection with the company. The promoters 
 did not i)roceed with the bill. 
 
 In 1866, the County Council of Wellington, 
 
 * Port Hope Harbour, 1854-5 j Vaudreuil Railway, 1854-5 ; 
 St. Lawrence and Bay Chaleurs Land Co., 1857 ; Brockville and 
 Ottawa Railway, 1860; Onslow Survey, 1862; Preston and 
 Berlin Railway, 1862; Joliette incorporation, 1863; Eastern 
 Townships Bank, 1864 ; DeL^ry Gold Mining Co., 18.;5 ; Long 
 Point Company, 1866. 
 
 t Montreal City Loan, 18C2; Buffalo & Lake Huron Rail- 
 way, 1863 ; Tadousac Hotel Co., 1865; Bank of U. C, 1866 ; 
 Clifton Suspension Bridge, 1867-8. 
 
 t St. Lawrence Mining Co., 1854-5. 
 
PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 51 
 
 having petitioned for an Act to legalize their By- Wellington 
 law granting aid to a certain railway, presented 
 a further petition, praying that the Rule requir- 
 ing notice might be suspended in their case ; and 
 the Committee on Standing Orders, having con- 
 sidered the last mentioned petition, reported that 
 no sufficient reason had been urged to induce 
 them to recommend a susi)ension of the Rule. 
 
 In one case* the committee reported that the Special 
 
 ^ Reports. 
 
 notice ought not to be dispensed with, but that a 
 bill might be introduced for the relief of the 
 petitioner, by extending in his favor the time for 
 appealing against a decision of the Trinity Board. 
 The bill was accordingly introduced, but was 
 subsequently dropped. In another casef the 
 committee reported that a charter proposed to be 
 amended had become void by non user ; and the 
 House justified the report by taking no further 
 action in the matter. 
 
 In the Session of 1867-8 (after Confederation), 
 the committee reported, with reference to two 
 petitions, " . they appeared to come more pro- 
 perly within the jurisdiction of the Local Legis- 
 lature,! and they were not proceeded with 
 
 • Malcolm Smith, to be reinstated as a pilot, 1859, 
 t North-west Transit Co., 1861 5 and again in 1862. 
 t Gore District Mutual Insurance Association, 1867-8; Sor- 
 ghum Growers' Association of Essex, 1867-8. 
 
52 
 
 PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 I J 
 
 iiiiiihii 
 
 TO I 
 
 i ' 
 II! i I 
 
 Other par- 
 ties cannot 
 avail 
 
 themsolvcs 
 of a notice. 
 
 Petitions 
 
 referred 
 
 back. 
 
 Farther 
 Report, 
 amending 
 a former 
 one. 
 
 (See also chapter on Legislative Jurisdiction, 
 supra^ p. 13.) 
 
 It may be well to state, that the committee 
 (though not reporting any such case to the 
 House) has repeatedly decided that parties hav 
 mg a diverse interest from those by whom a 
 notice has been published, cannot avail them- 
 selves of such notice to proceed upon their own 
 account; among other cases, this decision was 
 given in legvrd to the Sault Ste. Marie Canal in 
 1851, and G-age's Will case in 18G2, to the know- 
 ledge of the writer. 
 
 After an unfavorable report from the com- 
 mittee, the House has, in a few instances,* 
 referred petitions back to the committee, with an 
 instruction to consider and report as to the 
 exjiediency of suspending the Rule. In one case 
 onlyt was their report favorable; and though 
 in this instance the Rule was suspended, and a 
 bill introduced, it was subsequentl}'- abandoned. 
 It has occasionally hapjoened, that after certain 
 petitions have been unfavorably reported on, 
 further evidence has been produced, suflBicient to ] 
 satisfy the committee. In such cases they have 
 made a further report, amending the former one, 
 and lepresenting either that the notice has since 
 
 * Reach road allowance, 1856; Elora incorporation, 1856 f 
 Turner's contract on Brant Gaol and Court House, 1856. 
 t Elora incorporation, 1856. 
 
 iltl' I 
 
PROOF OF NOTICES. 
 
 )een continued bo as to complete the full time 
 Required,* or that it has been amended so as to 
 leftt the requirements of the Rule,! or that the 
 evidence subsequently adduced proves that the 
 lotice was sufficient for all parties concenied.J 
 
 5S 
 
 ' Hamilton & Amherstburg Railway, 1854-5 ; Peterborough 
 School Trustees, 1857 ; St. Boilaventuro Municipality, 18C6. 
 t Gait & Guelpli Railway amendment, 1358. 
 i British Farmers' Union Insurance Co. of Brantford, 1859. 
 
54 
 
 lillll;! 
 
 ■|ll 
 
 ! ;- 
 
 7.— rriE.SEXTATION AND F1K8T KEADINa 
 
 OF BILL. 
 
 When a j)etitioii has been favorahly rejiorted 
 on by the Committee on Standing Orders, a bill 
 
 ■tion^of Bill ^^^^^ ^^^ introduced, upon a motion for leave, upon 
 a Monday, Wednesday or Friday, immediately 
 before the calling- of the Orders for i^rivate 
 bills* (preceded, Avhen the same is required by 
 the Report, by a motion to suspend the Rules). 
 The bill must be i^repared by the promoters, in 
 the English and French languages, and printed 
 
 Printing, (at their exj ense) by the Parliamentary contrac- 
 tor ; and 500 copies in English and 200 in French,! 
 must be deposited in the Private Bill Office, 
 
 * 66th Rule, Commons. Members of the Senate exercise 
 the right of bringing in bills, in that House, without a motion 
 for leave, in analogy with the practice in the House of Lords. 
 May, p. 430. 
 
 t Formerly, such bills only as related to Lower Canada 
 were required to be printed in French, but in 1867 this Rule was 
 made to apply to all bills. The printing of the French version 
 was occasionally dispensed with in bills concerning some locality 
 within the Eastern Townships of L. Canada. — St. Francis Bank, 
 1854-5 ; Eastern Townships Bank, 1854-5. 
 
PRESENTATION OF BILL. 
 
 55 
 
 oported 
 
 5, a bill 
 
 e, upon 
 
 'diately 
 
 l^riA'ate 
 
 irod by 
 
 Rules). 
 
 )tors, in 
 
 printed 
 
 contrac- 
 
 'rench,t 
 
 Office, 
 
 ! exercise 
 f a motion 
 of Lords. 
 
 r Canada 
 3 Rule was 
 ch version 
 oe locality 
 acis Bank, 
 
 nd distribution thereof made before the first 
 
 jreading.* It is only in the House of Commons, 
 
 jhowever, that bills are required to be printed at 
 
 his stage, in conformity tc* the Rule adopted in 
 
 oT. In the Senate they are printed, as heretc- 
 "ore, before the second reading.f 
 
 The amount of any rates, tolls, fees or fines Rates and 
 inserted in the bill, must be printed in italics ; J^ ^jJuo^? 
 these are technically regarded by the House as 
 blanks, to be iilled uj) by the committee on the 
 Inll, and are so inserted merely to shew the 
 amount intended to be proposed. J 
 
 When a bill for confirming any letters patent Bills for 
 or agreement is presented, a true copy of the any ITv^h 
 same must be attached thereto. § A bill of JgJeeme*nt. 
 this kind having been referred to the Private 
 Bill Committee in 1857, they reported that they 
 could not recommend that it be passed, because 
 no copy of the letters patent was attached. The 
 omission was, however, rectified by the House, a 
 copy of the letters patent being attached to the 
 bill in committee of the whole, and it finally 
 eceived the Royal Assent. || 
 
 In 1864, several petitions relating to munici- 
 
 * 5Sth Rule, Commons. 
 
 t 58th Rule, Senate. 
 
 X ^lay, p. 670. 
 
 § 57th Rule. 
 
 II Bcsseraer's Patent, 1857. 
 
60 
 
 PRESENTATION OF BILL. 
 
 ill I 
 
 Provisions 
 of eoveral 
 petitions 
 included in 
 one bill. 
 
 Dilla in- 
 formally 
 introduced 
 
 Time of 
 presenta- 
 tion. 
 
 Refercnca 
 to a stand- 
 ing com- 
 mittee, in 
 Common?. 
 
 palities within the same district, having boon 
 favorably reported on, the provisions of legiski- 
 tion sought by the different petitioners, were 
 combined into one bill by the promoters.* 
 
 If a bill has been informally or irregularly 
 introduced (/.e., prior to the presentation of a 
 petition, or to the lleport of the Standing Orders 
 Committee on such petition), it may be with- 
 drawn, with the leave of the House, and a new 
 l)ill be presented in the proper course. f 
 
 Private })ills must be presented within the first 
 four weeks of the Session ;| — but this period is 
 generally extended, to correspond with a like 
 extension in favor of petitions. (See supra, p. 38.) 
 
 Every private bill, when read a first time, in 
 the House of Commons, is referred to the Stand- 
 ing Committee on Private Bills, tho Standing- 
 Committee on Banking and Commerce, the 
 Standing Committee on Railways, Canals, and 
 Telegraph lines, or some other Standing Com- 
 mittee of a like nature : and all petitions for or 
 against the bill§ stand referred to such com- 
 
 • Arthabaska and Wolfe Municipalities, 1864. 
 
 t Halifax Townships, 1850; Rouville Division, 1859; Chi- 
 coutimi Municipality, 186.'); Union St. Josepli, Three RiverS; 
 1865. 
 
 X 49th Rule. 
 
 § Petitions in favor of, or ajainst private bills, are not pre- 
 uented in the House of Commons in the usual way of presenting 
 
PRESENTATION OF BILL. 
 
 6T 
 
 mittee. No bill,* originating in that House, of 
 which notice is required to be given under the 
 51st Rule, can be considered, after such reference, 
 until after ten clear dayr.' notice of the sitting of 
 the committee, affixed in the lobby, and appended 
 also to the Votes. In the case of bills received 
 from the vSenate, the notice required is two days 
 only.f Bills not requiring notice under the 
 51st Kule may be considered at any time after 
 reference. 
 
 This is another of the changes effected in 18G7 : 
 it was adopted with a ^iew to expedite the pro- 
 ceedings on private bills, and to enable the com- 
 mittees to enter at an earlier period upon their 
 labors, and so avoid the accumulation of business 
 too often thrust upon them near the close of the 
 Session. In the Senate, the practice in relation toV 
 to the reference of bills (which, until that year, mfttee"^ 
 was identical in both Houses), remains as hereto- Senato 
 fore ; l)ills are not referred until after the second 
 reading,! and the notice to be given by the 
 committee is one w^eek, upon l)ills of the Senate, 
 
 m 
 
 petitions, but are deposited in the Private Bill Office 5 and all 
 such as are deposited within a certain time after the second 
 reading of the bill, stand referred to the committee. May, p. 685. 
 
 • 59th Rule, Commons. 
 
 t GOth Rule, Commons. 
 
 X 59th Rule, Senate. 
 
:lii 
 
 ill ': 
 
 iii 
 
 , 1: 
 
 '1; ■' 
 
 
 58 
 
 Divorce 
 Bills. 
 
 PRESENTATION OF BILL. 
 
 and 24 hours upon those sent up from the 
 Commons.* 
 
 Divorce Bills (which invariably oiiginate in 
 the Upper House) are referred (afl r their first 
 reading in the Commons) to a selected committee, 
 in place of the Standing Committee on Private 
 Bills.f The evidence taken before the Senate 
 (a copy of which is applied for, and communi- 
 cated, by message) is referred to the committee, 
 with power to send for persons and papers, 
 and usually, to hear counsel-i The committee 
 give two days' notice of their sitting, as in the 
 case of other private bills. 
 
 * 60th Rule, Senate. 
 
 t In the British House of Coffimons, they are referred to 
 " The Select Committee on Divorce Bills.'' May, p. 758. 
 
 t Harris' divorce Bill, 1844-5; Beresford's do., 1852-3; 
 McLean's do., 1858 ; and again in 1859. 
 
 fer 
 
 ii'ii 
 
 llii 
 
 m 
 
 ili! 
 
from the 
 
 alginate in 
 r their first 
 committee, 
 on Private 
 the Senate 
 . communi- 
 committee, 
 nd papers, 
 committee 
 ^, as in the 
 
 ire referred 
 J, p. 758. 
 do., 1852-3 
 
 
 59 
 
 8.-~PAYMENT OF FEE AND CIIAKaES. 
 
 Immediately after the first reading (or, in the Fee pay- 
 Senate, 2iii<^r i\iQ second reading), and before thej^jj^ja" 
 consideration of the bill by the committee, the fee *"2' 
 and all other charges thereon, must be i)aid into 
 the Private Bill Ofhce . This however a]iplies only 
 to bills "giving any exclusive privilege, or for any 
 object of profit, or private, corporate, or individual 
 advantage ; or for amending, extenduig or en- Limitation 
 larging anj' former Acts in such manner as to con- 
 fer additional iwwers." On all such bills a fee of 
 $100 is levied, and the promoters are charged 
 with the expense of printing 500 coi)ies of the bill 
 in English and 200 in French, and of printing 500 
 copies of the Act in English and 250 in French, 
 with the Statutes : this last item is subsequently 
 refunded if the bill should fail to become law.* If 
 the bill has not been prej)ared in both languages, 
 it is charged with the cost of translation; and 
 any additional expense incurred, for re-printing 
 he bill in an amended form, or for printing sched- 
 
 • 58th Rule. 
 
60 
 
 PAYMENT OF FEE. 
 
 mi' 
 
 ules of tolls or other papers connected therewith, 
 
 j-gg pay- i^aust be defrayed by the promoters. The Fee is 
 
 Houso° *^°^ payable only in the House in which the bill 
 
 only. originates, and the charges for printing are made 
 
 in the House in which they may be incurred. 
 
 On Divorce Bills (which originate in the Upper 
 
 House) the fee of $100 must be deposited in the 
 
 hands of the Clerk of the Senate at the time of 
 
 presenting the petition.* 
 
 Formerly the amount of the Fee charged on 
 private bills was $60. In 1854-5, the Standing- 
 Committee of the Assembly on Contingencies re- 
 ported a recommendation that the amount should 
 be increased upon all private bills to $200 ; f and 
 in 1862, the Committee on Private Bills report- 
 ed! in favor of a scale of fees, adopting the ex- 
 isting rate ($60) as the minimum, and charging two 
 rates on bills for raising or expending a sum 
 amounting to $200,000 and under $400,000,— three 
 rates when amounting to $400,000 and under 
 $600,000, and so on in proportion ; — but no action 
 was taken by the House on either Reiiort.§ In 
 
 * 84th Rule, Senate. 
 
 t Assembly Journ., 1854-5, p. 358. 
 
 t 18th Report of Ccmmittee on Private Bills, L.A., 1862, 
 
 § In the British House of Commons, every bill " for the par 
 ticular benefit of any person or persons" is deemed a private bill 
 within the meaning of the Table of Fees ; and a fee is chargefll 
 at each stage of the proceedings on the petition and bill, of Ilk 
 
PAYMENT OF FEE. 
 
 61 
 
 tier e with, 
 'he Fee is 
 I the bill 
 are made 
 incurred, 
 he Upper 
 Led in the 
 he time of 
 
 hiarged on 
 Standing 
 vencies re^ 
 ant should 
 200 ;t and 
 lills report- 
 iig the ex- 
 irging two 
 i\rr a sum 
 )00,— three 
 md under 
 it no action 
 port.§ In 
 
 , L.A., 1862. 
 
 "for the parj 
 
 d a private billj 
 
 fee is chargof 
 
 nd bill, of likd 
 
 the codes of Rules adopted by the Senate and 
 House of Commons in 1867, the amount of the fee 
 was raised to 5^100. 
 In a few instances the fee has been refunded Refunding 
 
 of fccd» 
 
 upon the recommendation of the Private Bill 
 Committee, on the ground that the bill was aban- 
 doned by the promoters,* — that it amends an 
 Act of the i^resent Ses,- on which the fee was 
 already paid,| — that the fee was paid in the i>re- 
 rious Session,:}: — that the bill was rendered 
 necessary by the legislation of the previous Ses- 
 sion,§ — that there were legal diihculties in the 
 way of its i)assing,|| — that the bill has been laid 
 aside, and a general Act substituted,! — or that 
 the amendments to the charter of a certain 
 
 amount ill all cases, except that whoa the amount to be raised or 
 expended is £50,000 and under £100,000, the i^es payable at 
 the 1st, 2ud, and 3rd readings (£45 in all) are doubled, — if be- 
 tween £100,000 and £200,000, they are tripled, — and so on in 
 proportion. Fees are also paid by the opponents of a bill, on 
 presenting a petition against it. Bristowe, pp. 135 to 137. 
 
 * St. Lawrence Mining o., 1852--3 ; Gait & Guelph Rail- 
 way, 1866; Toronto and Owen Sound Railway, 1866; North- 
 west Transpoi -tion Co., 1866 ; Canadian Mutual Life Insurance 
 Co., 1867-8. 
 
 t Guelph iant trust, 1854-5, 
 
 t Johnston Estate, 1864. 
 
 § Coyne's relief, 1865. 
 
 II Ayr dam and water-course (J, Watson), 1856. 
 
 1[ Various bills for admission of attorneys to practise, 1857. 
 6 
 
62 PAYMENT OF FEE. 
 
 company, were rather for the advantage of the 
 public than of the company.* More frequently 
 the fee has been refunded without the recom- 
 mendation of the committee, by a motion to sus- 
 pend the Rule, though the attempt has not al- 
 ways been successful. It has been customary 
 upon the rejection or abandonment of a bill, to 
 refund the fees, upon a special motion being mad 
 to that effect in the House, — but one instance ol 
 a refusal to refund the same having occurred-! 
 The fees have even, in some instances, been re 
 funded at a subsequent Session.^ 
 Rccom- III 1863, a recommendation of the Committer 
 
 mendation 
 
 of commit- on Private Bills, that for the future, no motion foi 
 
 tee requir- . . , „ i -n i 
 
 «(i. remittmg the iee upon any bill be entertain 
 
 ed, except upon the recommendation of th( 
 committee, § was concurred in by the House 
 and it has since been generally acted upon. 
 
 The Spring Session of 1863 having been brough 
 to a premature close, before the private businesi 
 could be completed, such of the bills (on whicl 
 the fees had been paid) as were re-introduced a 
 the next Session were exempted from any furthe 
 payment.!! Arrangements were also made, ii 
 
 Proceed- 
 ings con- 
 tinued to 
 another 
 Session. 
 
 * Provincial Insurance Co., 1858 5 U. & L. Canada Brid, 
 Co., 186^. 
 
 t Lake Superio Mining Co., 1852-3. 
 
 X Bank of Canada, 1865 (Aug. Ses8.) ; Quebeu Pilots, ib. 
 
 § Assembly Journ., 1863 (Feb. Sess.), p. 210. 
 
 II Assembly Journ., 1863 (Aug. Sess.), pp. 91, 93. 
 

 
 4 
 
 
 PAYMENT OF FEE. 
 
 63 
 
 
 the same Session (Autumn Session of 1863), by 
 
 
 ige of the 
 
 which, in case that Session should be suddenly 
 
 • 
 
 requently 
 
 closed, all private and other bills undisposed of 
 
 
 le recom- 
 
 at the prorogation should, at the beginning of the 
 
 . 
 
 on to sus- 
 
 next Session, be at once advanced to the stage at 
 
 ^ 
 
 las not al- 
 
 which they had been suspended;* and a like 
 
 
 ustomary. 
 
 arrangement was effected in the Spring Session 
 
 
 ' a bill, to 
 
 ofl865.t 
 
 
 eincT made 
 
 
 
 nstance ol 
 
 • Assembly Journ., 1863, pp. 282, 288. 
 
 
 :)ccurred.t 
 
 t Assembly Journ., 18G5 (Jan. Sess.), pp. 22}, 24G. 
 
 
 , been re- 
 
 
 
 I^ommittee 
 
 
 -r 
 
 motion foi 
 
 * 
 
 ^ 
 
 entertain 
 
 
 
 on of the 
 
 
 
 le House 
 
 
 
 ipon. 
 
 
 
 en brough 
 
 
 
 to business 
 
 
 f 
 
 (on whicl) 
 
 
 
 reduced a 
 
 
 / 
 
 any furthe 
 
 
 
 made, ii 
 
 « 
 
 '■ 
 
 !)aDada firid^r 
 
 Pilots, lb. 
 
 
 
 93. 
 
 
 
64 
 
 9.— COMMITTEES ON miVATE BILLS, 
 
 AND THEIR POWEES. 
 
 It has been already stated that all private bills 
 
 before the House of Commons are referred, after 
 
 Standing ^^^ ^'^^^^ reading, either to the Standing Committee 
 
 committees ^j^ Private Bills, or to that on Banking' and Com- 
 
 on private ' ^ 
 
 bills. merce, or that on Railways, Canals, and Telegraph I 
 lines, or to some other Standing Committee of a 
 similar character * These committees are appoint- 
 ed early in the Session, and continue in existence 
 imtil its close. t They each consist of a large 
 
 * In 1866, the Bill respecting the Bar of Lower Canada was 
 referred to a select committee. 
 
 t This diflTers from the practice in the Imperial Parliament, 
 where all railway and canal bills before the Commons are refer- 
 red, after the second reading, to the " General Committee on Rail- 
 way and Canal Bills," and all other private bills to the " Com- 
 mittee of Selection." The bills are classified in groups by these 
 committees, who severally nominate special committees to con- 
 sider each group, with one of their own memj^ers as chairman. 
 (May, p. 674.) Each member of the committee on an opposed 
 bill is required to sign a declaration that his constituents have no 
 local interest, and that he has no personal interest in the bill, &c. 
 (/6., p. 682.) 
 
 numb 
 
 comm 
 
 and tl 
 
 their J 
 
 man. 
 
 meml 
 
 for ea 
 
 a rep( 
 
 rum,' 
 
 Meml 
 
 Ins 
 
 by t}^ 
 
 matte 
 
 if it tl 
 
 it ba( 
 
 Comn 
 
 back 1 
 
 tageo" 
 
 notic( 
 
 60th] 
 
 • In 
 
 elusive 
 
 manne; 
 
 Comm 
 
 reduce 
 
 of the 
 
 t M 
 
 t la 
 
 Sess.) 
 
BILLS, 
 
 vatQ bills 
 ■red, after 
 ommittee 
 md Com- 
 ?elegraph 
 ittee of a 
 B appoint- 
 existence 
 ^ a large 
 
 Canada was 
 
 Parliament, 
 ns are refer- 
 ittee on Rail- 
 the "Com- 
 ips by these 
 1663 to con- 
 3 chairman, 
 an opposed 
 ants have no 
 the bill, &c. 
 
 COMMITTEES ON PRIVATE BILLS. 65 
 
 number of members, who are nominated by a 
 committee of selection (for all standing committees) , 
 and the nomination confirmed by the House. At 
 their first meeting they proceed to elect a chair- 
 man. The quorum consists of a majority of the 
 members, though of late years it has been customary 
 for each committee, after its organization, to make 
 a report recommending a reduction of the quo- 
 rum,* which has been concurred in by the House. 
 Members may be subsequently added by theHouse . 
 Instructions may be given to these committees 
 bv the House, concerning particular bills, or other ^pociai 
 
 "' ' ° ^ Instruc- 
 
 matters.f After referrmg a bill, the House may, tions. 
 if it think i:)roi:)er, instruct the committee to report 
 it back before consideration.! The Private Bill 
 Committee have themselves occasionally reported 
 back bills which they thought might more advan- 
 tageously be referred to another committee. § The 
 notice already given by the committee under the 
 60th Rule, has generally been declared, m such 
 
 * In 1859, and in each subsequent Session (up to 1867, in- 
 clusive), the quorum of the Private Bill Committee was, in this 
 manner, reduced to seven members, while that of the Railway 
 Committee was, in the Sessions between 1857 and 1861 inclusive, 
 reduced to nine, but has since that time consisted of o majority 
 of the members. 
 
 t May, p. 722, 
 
 t Isle J6su3 Roads Co. ; Terrebonne Roads Co., 1863 (Feb. 
 Ses3.); Napanee River Improvements Co., 1866. 
 
 § Niagara District Bank, 1863. 
 
66 
 
 COMMITTEES ON 
 
 cases, sufficient* The Standing Committee on 
 Special in- Railways was, in 1852-3, instructed to consider the 
 
 structioaa. ,. „ i- l^ \ '\^ r 
 
 expediency of amcndmg the bill lor empowering 
 the Great Western Railroad Comr)any to construct 
 a railroad from Hamilton to Toronto, so as to 
 authorize them to construct a branch railway from 
 their line to Port Dalhousie, and they reported the 
 bill with an additional clause iiroviding for the 
 said branch.! The committee was again instruc- 
 ted in 1854-5, to enquire into the expediency of 
 establishing a branch telegraph in the Parliament 
 House ; which was subsequently effected, upon 
 their report.^: In 1863, the Standing Committee 
 on Banking and Insurance, having under consid- 
 eration a bill to repeal the Acts incoiporating the 
 Colonial Bank and certain other Banks that had for- 
 feited their charters, made a report suggesting that 
 they be empowered to extend their inquiries to any 
 other banks in a like position ; and they were in- 
 structed accordingly. § There are some general 
 instructions given by Standing Orders of the House, 
 concerning all private bills, vis. : — to call the atten- 
 tion of the House to any provision that does not 
 appear to have been contemplated in the notice, 
 as reported on by the Committee on Standing 
 
 General 
 Instruc- 
 tions. 
 
 • Assembly Journ., 1863 (Feb. Sess.) p. 176 j 1866, p. 202. 
 t Assembly Journ., 1852-3, pp. 290, 340. 
 t Assembly Journ., 1854-5, pp. 177, 197, 229. 
 § Assembly Journ,, 1863 (Aug, Seas.), p. 102. 
 
PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 67 
 
 ttee on 
 ider the 
 )wering 
 mstruct 
 o as to 
 ay from 
 rted the 
 
 for the 
 instruc- 
 eiicy of 
 liament 
 i, upon 
 nmittee 
 
 consid- 
 ting the 
 had for- 
 ing that 
 is to any 
 rere in- 
 general 
 ! House, 
 le atten- 
 oes not 
 
 notice, 
 tanding 
 
 p. 202. 
 
 Orders;* — to require proof in every case that the 
 persons whose names appear in a l)ili for incor- 
 porating a company are of full age, and in a posi- 
 tion to effect the objects contemplated, and have 
 consented to become incorporated.! And in bills 
 for confirming any letters i^atent, or agreement, 
 the committee is required to see that there is a true 
 copy of the same annexed to the bill.| Certain 
 specific instructions are given by Standing Orders 
 of the Houses of Lo^is and Commons, to commit- 
 tees on all Railway Bills,§ the object of which is, 
 no doubt, to a certain extent attained in this 
 country by the provisions of the G-eneral Railway 
 clauses consolidation Act. There are also certain 
 general instructions on all bills relating to Inclo- 
 sure and Drainage, Turnpike Roads, Cemeteries 
 and Gras Works, and Divorce cases. || 
 
 The committee has no power to entertain ques- j^^ ^^^^^ 
 tions in reference to the compUance with the 5ntJ)°2I*ind- 
 Standing Orders,^ (which pertains solely to the '^s Ordew. 
 Standing Orders Committee) unless by special 
 order from the House. This order is only given 
 when the House, on the report of the Standing 
 
 * 64th Rule. 
 
 t 62udRule. 
 
 t 57th Rule. See also May, pp. 713, 714. 
 
 § Bristowe, p. 23. 
 
 II Bristowe, p. 26. 
 
 IT Sherwood, p. 46. 
 
68 
 
 COMMITTEES ON 
 
 Bill must 
 
 Examina- 
 tion of 
 witnesses 
 upon oath. 
 
 Orders Committee, allow parties to proceed with 
 their bill on complying with certain, standing 
 orders which they had previously neglected.* 
 In ordinary cases the committee merely inquire 
 whether the Orders of the House have been com- 
 plied with ; and in cases where a special report 
 has been made by the Standing Orders Committee 
 thrnoUce ^^^ reference to the extent of the notice, it is com- 
 proved. pared with the powers and privileges conferred 
 by the bill, and if they apx)ear to exceed the limits 
 of the notice, the fact is specially rei^orted to the 
 House .f 
 
 The committee has power to send for persons 
 and papers, and to examine witnesses upon oath, 
 the expci. es of such witnesses being defrayed 
 by the parties in whose interest they have been 
 summoned. Prior to Confederation, the commit- 
 tees of either House had no x)ower to examine 
 witnesses upon oath, several attemjots to pass a 
 law to confer such a power having failed ; I but 
 in the Session of 1867-8, an Act was passed em- 
 powering the committee on any private bill, in 
 either House of Parliament, to examine witnesses 
 upon oath, to be administered by the chairman 
 or any member of such committee. § 
 
 • May, p. 707. 
 t 64th Rule. 
 
 t Assembly Journ , 1856, pp. 498, 508, 559 j and 1857, pp. 
 31, 191. 
 
 § 31 Vic, c. 24, sections 2 and 3. 
 
PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 CO 
 
 jd with 
 :anding 
 lected.* 
 inquire 
 en com- 
 1 report 
 nmittee 
 is com- 
 nferred 
 e limits 
 i to the 
 
 persons 
 on oath, 
 .efrayed 
 ve been 
 lommit- 
 ixainuio 
 pass a 
 ; t but 
 sed em- 
 bill, in 
 itnesses 
 lairman 
 
 1857, pp. 
 
 In all questions arisinff before the committee, Casting 
 
 ^ ^ voto of 
 
 the chairman votes as a member, and whenever chairman* 
 the voices are equal, he has a second or casting- 
 vote.* This provision was introduced in the 
 revised code of Ilules adopted in 1860, and is 
 expressly limited to committees on i^rivate bills 
 (including the Standing Committee on Private 
 Bills, and that on Railways, and any other com- 
 mittee to whom private bills may be referred): 
 it is based on Imperial practice.! The Contro- 
 verted Elections Act of Canada confers the same 
 power on the chairman of an election commit- 
 tee .J 
 
 Every member present in the committee shoiUd Every 
 vote on all questions brought up, judging from should vote 
 the analogy of the practice of the House in this 
 respect,§ and that of Election Committees under 
 the provisions of the above mentioned Act, though 
 in the absence of any express rule or order it 
 may be questioned whether the committee has 
 power to compel a member to vote who declines 
 to do so. II 
 
 * 63rd Rule. 
 
 t This practice prevails in committees of the Commons on 
 private bills j but in the Lords' Committees the chairman votes 
 like any other peer; and if the numbers on a division be equal, 
 the question is negatived. May, pp. 386, 387. 
 
 t Consol. Stat, of Canada, Chap. 7, sec. 89, 
 
 § May, p. 334. 
 
 II Frere has some excellent remarks upon this question ; but 
 
70 
 
 COMMITTEES ON PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 Cannot sit The committee cannot sit during the sitting ol 
 
 during B\t' ° ^ 
 
 ting of tho the House ; all proceedings are void after an- 
 nouncement that the Speaker is in the Chair* 
 Leave has, however, in two instances, been grant- 
 ed to the Committee on Private Bills to sit during 
 the morning sittings of the Legislative Assem- 
 bly, — once ill 1858,t for one occasion only, and 
 again, in 1860,:): for the residue of the Session. § 
 
 the difference in the constitution of committees on private bills 
 in the House of Commons, renders these remarks less applicable 
 to the Standing Committees on private bills in this country. 
 Frere, p. 75, — and again, on p. 84. 
 
 * Sherwood, p. 45. 
 
 t Assembly Journ., 1858, p. 058. 
 
 t Assembly Journ., 1860, p. 311. 
 
 § By a Standing Order of the House of Commons of Great 
 Britain, 21st July, 1856, it is ordered "That on Wednesdays 
 and other morning sittings of the House, all committees shall 
 have leave to sit, except while the House is at prayers, during 
 the sitting, and notwithstanding the adjournment of the House." 
 And to avoid interruption to urgent business before committees, 
 leave is frequently obtained, on the meeting of the House in the 
 afternoon, for a committee to sit till 5 o'clock. May, p. 388. 
 
jittiiig or 
 ifter an- 
 Chair.* 
 m grant- 
 it during 
 ! Assem- 
 ►nly, and 
 ssion.§ 
 
 )rivate bills 
 ; applicable 
 is country. 
 
 Tl 
 
 13 of Great 
 Wednesdays 
 littees shall 
 ^ers, during 
 lie House." 
 committees, 
 louse in the 
 y, p. 388. 
 
 10.— niOCEEDINGS IN COxMMITTEE UN 
 
 BILL. 
 
 At each sitting, a list of the bills which are Order of 
 ready for consideration is laid before the com- tion. 
 mittee, in the order of their reference ; and they 
 are usually taken up in that order, unless it may 
 be otherwise agreed upon, for the convenience of 
 parties in attendance. In the case of opposed 
 bills, it is customary for the parties to come to an 
 arrangement in the Private Bill Office for the 
 selection of a particular day for the consideration 
 of a bill in which they are interested ; and the 
 bill, in such a case, takes precedence of all other 
 bills appointed for that day: where no such 
 arrangement is made, the bill is taken uj) in its 
 order. It has been stated above, that no bill of jj^^jj^,^ 
 which notice by ad^eitisement is required by 8ive°.Jy^ 
 the Rules, can be considered until due notice has '°.<i^.'*»*'* 
 been given by the committee.* This notice is 
 
 cases. 
 
 * This notice consists, in the Commons, of 10 days (affixed 
 in the Lobby, and appended to the Votes), upon bills origina- 
 ting in that House, and 2 days upon bills from the Upper 
 House. (60th Rule, Commons.) In the Senate the notice 
 
72 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 frequently reduced by the House, towards the 
 close of the Session, to 2 or 3 days ;* but no 
 motion to this effect (of a general nature) can 
 now be entertained by the House, except upon 
 the recommendation of two or more of the Stand- 
 ing Committees charged with the consideration 
 of private bills.f In some instances it has been 
 dis];>ensed with altogether, ui^on special motion, as 
 regards particular bills ; | the pro];>riety of this 
 course, however, has been much questioned, on 
 the ground of the wrong inflicted on parties who 
 may desire to oppose any such bill, and for whoso 
 protection this notice is intended ; and a susx^ension 
 of the Rule in this behalf is now less frequent, being 
 made only in urgent cases. 
 
 Parties desirous of opposing any bill before a 
 
 must ])e one week (affixed in the Lobby) on bills originating in 
 that House, and 24 hours upon bills from the Commons. (60th 
 Rule, Senate.) 
 
 ♦ Assembly Journ., 1857, p. 423; 1858, p. 907; 1859, p. 
 271; 1860, pp. 232, 311; 1861, p. 216; 1865 (Aug. Sess.), 
 pp.108, 175; 1866, p. 147. 
 
 t 60th Rule. 
 
 t Colonial Bank, 1858 ; Oshawa incorporation, 1859 ; Peter- 
 boro' and Victoria land tax, 1860 ; TiOndon Church land, 1863 
 (Aug. Sess.), on the recommendation of the committee, at 
 the request of all parties. And on the 28th May, 1862, the 
 Rule was suspended altogether for the residue of the Session. 
 In 1863 (Aug. Sess.) it was suspended with reference to all 
 bills which had been reported on in the previous Session, which 
 had c' tsed prematurely. 
 
COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 73 
 
 •ds the 
 but no 
 re) can 
 t npon 
 
 Stand- 
 eration 
 IS been 
 tion, as 
 of this 
 led, on 
 es who 
 
 whoso 
 )ension 
 t, being 
 
 •efore a 
 
 nating in 
 3. (60th 
 
 1859, p. 
 J. Sess.);. 
 
 ) ; Peter- 
 lud, 1863 
 litlee, at 
 L862, the 
 Session. 
 ce to all 
 )n, which 
 
 committee, either on the preamble or the details, Opponents 
 
 ^ _ should pre- 
 
 present a petition, stating the grounds of their sent a peti- 
 opposition.* No such petition can be enter- 
 tained that does not distinctly specify the grounds 
 on which the petitioners object to the bill or any 
 of its provisions. The petitioners can only ])c 
 heard on the grounds so stated, and if the same 
 are not specilled with sufficient accuracy, the 
 committee may direct a more specific statement 
 to be given in writing-, but limited to the grounds 
 of objection which had been inaccurately speci- 
 fied.! No i)ctitioners will be heard against the 
 prea;mble, unless in their petition they pray to be 
 heard against it.t If no parties, counsel, or ^^'^ ^^i® 
 
 ^ ^ ^ / appear- 
 
 acrent, appear on behalf of a petition when it is auco. 
 
 * In the Commons of Great Britain (as has already been 
 stated) all petitions in favor of, or against, or otherwise relat- 
 ing to private bills (except the original petition for the bill, 
 and petitions for additional provisions), aie now presented by 
 depositing them in the Private Bill Office. Every petition 
 against a private bill, deposited not later than 10 days after the 
 first reading, standi referred to the committee. Petitioners 
 will not be heard before the committee unless their petition 
 has been prepared and signed in strict conformity with the 
 rules and orders of the House, and has been deposited within 
 the time limited, except where they complain of any matter 
 which may have arisen in committee, or of any proposed 
 amendment, or additional provision. May, pp. 685, 6S^5. 
 
 t May, p. 687. 
 
 t Bristowe, p. 28. 
 
 7 
 
„g^^^ 
 
 74 
 
 Counsel. 
 
 To what 
 extent 
 members 
 may act. 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 read, the opposition of the petitioner is held to be 
 abandoned.* It is right, however, to state, with 
 regard to these restrictions, t) at although strictly 
 spealdng they 'dyy-plj to all opposed bills, they are 
 never fully enforced by the committee, unless 
 the circumstances of the case appear to require it. 
 The i:>romoters of a bill may be heard by 
 counsel if they desire it.f Petitioners against 
 the preamble or any of the clauses may be heard 
 by counsel, if, in their petition, they have pray el 
 to be heard by themselves, their counsel, or 
 agent.| Nc member can act as counsel before 
 the House or before any committee ; nor can any 
 member of either House act as counsel before the 
 other House, on ai y bill depending therein, 
 without special permission : when such permis- 
 sion is given, it is understood that the gentlemen 
 who receive it ,rould not be permitted to vote on 
 
 * Bristowe, p. 27. 
 
 t A Parliamentary Agent appearing before a committee of 
 the British House of Commons for a private bill (or upon a 
 petition against a bill containing a prayer to be heard by coun- 
 sel) is always called on by the committee clerk to hand in the 
 names of two counsel, though the number of counsel who may 
 be heard is not limited to these. — Evidence of Q. L. Smith, 
 Esq., Parliamentary Agent,— appended to the 3rd Report of 
 the Committee of the House of Commons on Private Bills, 
 1847. (Ano. to Ques. 948.) 
 
 t Stai.ding Orders of British House of Commons relative to 
 Private Bills, 85. 
 
^ 
 
 is held to be 
 state, with 
 ough strictly 
 ills, they are 
 ittee, unless 
 to require it. 
 »e heard by 
 ners against 
 lay be heard 
 have pray el 
 
 counsel, or 
 unsel before 
 
 nor can any 
 ?el before the 
 ling therein, 
 such pormis- 
 e gentlemen 
 ?A to vote on 
 
 a committee of 
 bill (or upon a 
 i heard by couii- 
 k to hand in the 
 counsel who may 
 of G. L. Smith, 
 e 3rd Report of 
 n Private Bills, 
 
 imons relative to 
 
 COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 75 
 
 such bill, if it should be received by the House 
 of which they are mem])ers.'*'- This permission 
 has in a few instances been given to members of 
 ihe Assembly,! — and once only to a member of 
 the Legislative Council.^ 
 
 A filled uj) co])Y of the bill, containing the Fuicd up 
 amendments proposed to l^e sulnnitted ])y the bui to be 
 promoters, must bo deposited in the Private Bill ^ ^ ' 
 Office, one clear day before the consideration of 
 the bill.§ All parties x^etitioning against the 
 bill are entitled to obtain a copy of the j^roposed 
 amendments, one day before the consideration of 
 the bill. II 
 
 In the case of the Quebec Marino Insurance Amciia- 
 
 . - . . - meats by 
 
 Co. m I8O0 vlan. bess ), a petition was iirescnied, promoters 
 on the part of th(^ company, for leave to amend 
 their ])ill in a matter not ccutomplated by the 
 
 * May, p. :'SS. 
 
 t Lea\e was granted l)y the Legislative Assembly to the 
 Hon. T. C. Aylwin, in the session of 1844-5, to appear at the 
 Bar of ihe Legislative Council on the Naturalization Bill 
 (Doiiegani's),— and to Messrs. Ross and Cauchon, in 1850, on 
 the Dorchester Bridge Bill. Assembly Journ., 1844-5, p. 408 5 
 1850, p. 201. 
 
 X Leave was granted by the Legislative Council, in 1843, 
 to the Hon. Mr. Draper, to appear at the Bar of the Legislative 
 Assembly as Counsel on the bill relating to the University of 
 Toronto. Council Journ., 1843, p. 104. 
 
 § Glstilule. 
 
 II May, p, 682. 
 
76 
 
 Preamlle 
 rca^l. 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 notice, and the Standing Orders Committee re- 
 ported favorably on the petition, on the ground 
 that the sanction of the shareholders to the 
 amendment had been obtained. A like course 
 was taken in regard to the Montreal Corj^oration 
 bill, in the autumn Session of the same year. 
 
 When the committee are about to j)roceed to 
 the consideration of a private bill, the i)arties are 
 called in, and the preamble is read; this being 
 different from the practice in regard to public 
 bills, the preamble of which is postponed until 
 after the consideration of the clauses.* (In- 
 stances may, however, arise, in which the com- 
 mittee may feel it desirable that they should 
 reserve their judgment upon the preamble until 
 certain details of the bill have been settled : in 
 such a case they postpone the preamble until 
 after the consideration of the clauses ; but this is 
 of very rare occurrence.) The petitions against 
 the bill are then read, and appearances entered 
 
 * This course is adopted in regard to public bills, because 
 they are founded on leasons of state policy, and the House 
 having aflirmed the principle on the second reading, it beconaes 
 the duty of the committee not to discuss the principle again 
 upon tiie preamble, but to settle the clauses first, and then to 
 consider the preamble in reference to the clauses only. (May, 
 p. AGS.) But the expediency of a private bill being mainly 
 founded on the allegations of fact (contained in the preamble) 
 proof of such allegations is necessary, as a proper basis of 
 legislation, fjb. p, 718.) 
 
mittee re- 
 e ground 
 rs to the 
 ve course 
 )ri)oratioii 
 year. 
 )roceed to 
 )arties are 
 his beino' 
 to public 
 lied until 
 '^s* (111- 
 tlic com- 
 y should 
 nble until 
 ettled: in 
 ible until 
 but this is 
 LS against 
 s entered 
 
 ills, because 
 the House 
 r, it becomes 
 nciple again 
 and then to 
 )nly. (May, 
 eing mainly 
 le preamble) 
 rjer basis of 
 
 COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 71 
 
 upon each petition with which the parties intend 
 to proceed.* 
 
 The promoters (or their counsel) first staLo their Promoters 
 case on the x^reamble, and then (if required) pro- 
 ceed to call witnesses, and to examine them. At 
 the conclusion of this examination, when the coun- 
 sel or agent for any petitioner rises to cross-examine 
 a witness, is the proper time for taking ol^jections 
 to the locus standi of such petitioner.! It is neces- Locui atan- 
 sary that a petitioner should state the manner in tioners! '' 
 which his interest is affected, in order that he may 
 obtain a locus standi at all in opposition to the 
 measure ; but the grounds of objection to the bill 
 on which he may be heard in support of such 
 opposition, are not confined to those arising imme- 
 diately out of his private interests.^ 
 
 If the committee decide in favor of his locus 
 standi, he may address the committee, and produce 
 his witnesses, and they in their turn are cross-ex- 
 amined by the counsel for the promoters, who has 
 the right to reply. § The committee may, if they 
 please, hear x)etitioiiers against a bill on the ground 
 
 * May, p. 71G. 
 
 t Petitioners are said to have no locus standi before a com- 
 mittee, when their property or interests are not directly and 
 specially affected by the bill, or when, for other reasons, thoy are 
 not entitled to oppose it. May, p, GOO. 
 
 t Frere, p. 32. 
 
 § Briatjwc, p, 28. 
 
.-^MglBS- 
 
 
 78 
 
 PROCEEDIN' S IN 
 
 Petitioners ot' Competition ;* but shareiiulders _of| a company 
 agains a pj.Qjj^Qj- jjjg ^ }j j^ ^TG not heard in opposition unless 
 
 their interest be distinct from that of the com- 
 pany.! 
 
 A petitioner whose interest is affected only by 
 particular clauses in the bill, which are immaterial 
 to the main objects of the measure, and are not 
 referred to in the preamble, would have no right 
 to be heard against the i)reamble, but only against 
 such clauses .J 
 Members If the attendance of a member of the House be 
 
 required as . ■, ., ,■, • p -i 
 
 mtaessea. required as a witness, the proper course is lor the 
 chairman to write to the member requesting his 
 attendance ; if he refuse to attend, the fact is re- 
 ported to the House, in order that they may take 
 such stops in the matter as they see iit.§ 
 
 A witness has a right to claim that his expenses 
 be paid or guaranteed, before his examination. A 
 witness cannot correct his evidence, except by a 
 subsequent examination. || 
 
 Expenses 
 of vit- 
 nesses. 
 
 * May, p. 695 
 
 t May, p. G99. 
 
 t Frerc, p. 33. 
 
 § Freie, p. 70. A Peer of Parliameut cannot be compelled 
 to attend a committee of the Commons, but if he attend volun- 
 I uily, it is not necessary that a message be sent to the Lords 
 rei[uesting his attendance, as is the case in committees on public 
 matiers. lb., p. 71. 
 
 !l Frere, p. 72. 
 
anpany 
 1 unless 
 e com- 
 
 »iily by 
 naterial 
 are not 
 right 
 against 
 
 )use be 
 for the 
 ng his 
 t is re- 
 Ly take 
 
 :penses 
 on. A 
 t by a 
 
 COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 79 
 
 AVhen counsel are addressinj? the committee, or Room 
 
 _ . cleared for 
 
 while Witnesses are under examination, the com- discussion. 
 mittee room is an open court ; but when the com- 
 mittee are about to deliberate, all the counsel, 
 agents, witnesses, and strangers are ordered to 
 withdraw, and the committee sit with closed doors. 
 When they have decided any question, the doors 
 are again ox'jened, and the chairman acquaints the 
 parties with the determination of the committee, 
 if it concern them.* 
 
 Members of the House who are not on the Right of 
 committee, have a right to be present during the of the 
 examination of witnesses, but not to interfere m be present, 
 the proceedings.! It is doubtful how far the 
 committee has a rii>'ht to exclude them from the 
 room when cleared for discussion, but it is always 
 customary for them to retire. 
 
 If any member insist on his right to remain, a member 
 against the wish of the committee, their only amination. 
 course is to report the circumstances of tne case 
 to the House. J If a member of the House be 
 under examination as a witness, and the matter 
 under consideration shall have aricen out of his 
 
 )mpenecl 
 d volun- 
 e Lords 
 n public 
 
 • May, p. 715. 
 
 t By a Standing Order of the House of Lords, all Peers are 
 entitled to atten'^' the select committees of that House, and iliey 
 are not excluded frona speaking (though they be not of the ' om- 
 mittee), but they may not vote. May, p. 332. 
 
 t Frere, p. 74:. 
 
80 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 Question 
 put OD pre- 
 amble. 
 
 rrcamble 
 not proved. 
 
 evidence, the right of the committee to exclude 
 him from the room during the discussion, is less 
 doubtful* • 
 
 "When the arguments and evidence upon the 
 preamble have been heard, the room is cleared, 
 and a question is jnit " That the preamble has 
 been proved," which is resolved in the affirmative 
 or the negative, as the case may be : f — If iii the 
 negative, the committee report to the House 
 " That the preamble has not been proved to their 
 satisfaction." After this decision, it is not com- 
 i;)etent for the committee to re-consider and re- 
 verse it, but the bill should (if necessary) be 
 re-committed for that x)urx)ose.| 
 
 In the Imperial Parliament, the committee are 
 
 * The India Judicature Committee (House of Commons), in 
 1782, having cleared the room to deliberate on the refusal of 
 Mr. Barwell to answer certain questions, he insisted on his priv- 
 ilege, as a Member of the House, of being present during the 
 debate. The committee objected that as a party concerned in 
 the matter under discussion, he had no right to be present. Mr. 
 Barwell still persisting in his right, two members attended the 
 Spenlter, and returned with his ()| Inion that Mr. Barwell had no 
 light to insist upon being present during the debate, upon which 
 he withdrew. The House subse([uently ordered "Tint when 
 any matter shall arise on which the said committee wish to 
 debate, it shall be at tlieir discretion to require every person not 
 being a member of the committee to withdraw." May, p. 382. 
 
 t May, p. 720. 
 
 t May, p. 722. 
 
COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 81' 
 
 excludo 
 11, is less- 
 
 ipon the 
 
 cleared, 
 
 tible has 
 
 irmative 
 
 ff in the 
 
 House 
 
 to their 
 
 lot com- 
 
 and re- 
 
 ary) be 
 
 ittee are 
 
 inmons), in 
 i refusal of 
 )n his priv- 
 during the 
 ncerned in 
 sent. Mr. 
 tended the 
 ell had no 
 pon which 
 "h'lt when 
 e wish to 
 )crson not 
 y, p. 382. 
 
 not required to assign any reasons for thus de- Roasona 
 ciding agamst the further jirogress of the bilJ, 
 though the necessity for such information, to en- 
 able the House to determine upon their rei>ort, is 
 obvious.* A different course prevails in Canada, 
 the committee being required to state in their re- 
 portf the grounds of their decision. Of these 
 may be instanced, — That no evidence was offered 
 in favor of the preamble, I — Insufficient informa- 
 tion or contrary evidence, § — No proof (in the 
 petition or otherwise) of consent of the p; rties in- 
 terested, II — No proof that the majority of those 
 whose interests would be affected are in favor of 
 the scheme,! — That the petitioners against the 
 measure are as numerous as those in its favor,** 
 or are more numerous,!! — That there is great 
 
 • Alf)heu3 Todd's Report on Private Bills, 1^4.1. 
 
 f GGthRule. 
 
 I River du Chene, 1852-3; Gatien estate, 1857. 
 
 § Small's Pickering road allowance, 1852-3; Clarke Sur- 
 vey, 1857; Notre Dame du Portage Municipality, 1859 ; Onslow 
 Survey, 18G2. 
 
 'I Bill to incorporate the Benevolent Societies of tin; ^Y^;S- 
 leyan Church, 1850; Guelph and Welling'on Roads Co., 1859; 
 Russel Estate, 18G5. 
 
 IF Hull Presbyterian Church, 135G; Quebec limits exten- 
 sion, 1800; Lennox and Addington separation, 1860. 
 
 ** Whitby division, 1857 ; Stanbridgc division, 18GG. 
 
 tt Grey and Simcoe division, 1857 ; Bolton incorporation, 
 1858 ; Durham School section, 1859; Berlin town limits, 18G5. 
 
82 
 
 PEOCEEDINGS IN 
 
 diflerenco of opinion in the locality affected, as to 
 Preamble the expediency of the measure,* — That the state- 
 no P'^^^'*'* jjjgj^^ q£ facts set forth in the i^reamble has been 
 disproved,! — That legislative interference is not 
 desirable or necessary,^ — That it Avould inter- 
 fere with law-suits pending, § or with existing 
 rights, II — That the powers sought for would not 
 advance the interests of the locality,T[ — That the 
 bill provides for an extension of the powers of a 
 certain company to purposes entirely foreign to 
 its original charter,** — That it contains most un- 
 usual in-o visions, ft — That a certain survey 
 
 * Ayr incorporation, 1857} ^Halifax townsliip, 18G0; Clif- 
 ton division, 18GG. 
 
 t Barton road allowance, 1852-3. 
 
 t East Hawkesbury survey, 185G j Clarke survey, 185G; 
 Van Norman estate, 1857; Delaware survey, 1857; York and 
 Peel separation, 1861 ; Quebec Stevedores incorporation, 18G1; 
 Augusta Municipalities' Fund, 18G2; Bruce county town, 18G1; 
 Bayham by-law, 18G5, and 18GG ; Montreal Licensed Victuallers, 
 1SG5. 
 
 § Challiani survey, 1858; Peel county town, 1859; Rich- 
 mond Street (London) boundary line, 18G1 ; Peterboro' and 
 Port Hope Railway, 1862. 
 
 II North-western Railway, 1856 ; Clifton suspension bridge, 
 1858; Burford survey, 18G0; Hope survey, 1860; Etchemin 
 bridge, 1862 ; Renfrew division, 1863. 
 
 IT St. Lawrence and Bay Chaleurs^Land and Lumber Co., 1858. 
 
 ** St. Clair and Rondeau Plank Road Co. amendment, 1857. 
 
 tt Metropolitan Ga3 and Water Co., 1857; Richelieu Com- 
 pany, 1862. 
 
COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 83 
 
 jtcd, as to 
 the state- 
 has been 
 ice is not 
 Lild iiitor- 
 L existing 
 voukl not 
 -That the 
 wcrs of a 
 foreign to 
 i most nn- 
 i survey 
 
 18G0; Clif. 
 
 i-vey, 185G; 
 
 York and 
 
 ation, 1861; 
 
 own, 18G1; 
 
 Victunllers, 
 
 859; Rich- 
 erboro' anJ 
 
 uon bridge, 
 ; Etcliemia 
 
 r Co., 1858, 
 ment, 1857. 
 lelicu Com- 
 
 which is sought to be confirmed was not made in 
 conformity with the provisions of the law, * — Preamble 
 That the iilled-up bill submitted to the committee °^*P'"^'^ 
 diflerod materially from the prmted bill as origin- 
 ally referred to them, and was not in accordance 
 with the petition,! — or, That it is in the power 
 of the Ex<^cutive Government to carry into effect 
 the objects com 'm^dated by the bill,| or the 
 Court of Chancery (in a bill affecting the interests 
 of minors).^ In one instance, in 1857, the com- 
 mittee reported, with reference to the bill to in- 
 corporate the St. Lawrence and Bay Chaleurs 
 Land and Lumber Co., that although they could 
 not say -the preamble was not proved, yet they 
 could not recommend the passing of the bill, its 
 promoters being foreigners, residing out of the 
 Province. 
 
 If, upon the report of the committee concerning Committee 
 a certain bill, that the joreamble is not proved, quirea to 
 the House be not satisfied with the reasons as- dence 
 signed in the report, the committee are directed to g^dod 
 report the reasons or evidence which guided them l^!iV^„'*°" 
 in their decision ; and these, when reported, have 
 generally satisfied the House, so that the bill has 
 
 * Beverly survey, 1864, 
 t Toronto Esplanade, 1854-5. 
 
 t Bill to vest in J. Carling and others, a portion of Church 
 Street, London, 1852-3. 
 § Watson's Ayr Mill-dam, 1856. 
 

 %. 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^^^ 
 
 pm 
 <# 
 
 /] 
 
 oi.^ 
 
 ^;. 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^^" 
 
 
 
 /; 
 
 yf 
 
 <J 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 i.O 
 
 !l 
 
 2.0 
 
 125 
 
 i'4 111.6 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 4. 
 
 ^^. 
 
 # /^ ,M^^ 
 
 7 / ^ V ^^%f 
 
 5^: 
 
 /A 
 
 r^ 
 
 
 A 
 
 Ua 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 4^ 
 
 m^ ^^ 
 
 ^<b 
 
 .V 
 
 
 WU " ^ 
 
 33 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 1458C 
 
 ■716) B72-4503 
 
 O" ,A <^.55^ 
 
 4^ ^ 
 
'^- 
 
 i" sr.o 
 
 J? 
 
 % 
 
 '^- 
 
 mc' 
 
 ■'^ 
 
 '^ 
 
 ;;'^> .-^^'-^t'- I 
 
•84 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 amend 
 imont 
 
 Bill may proceeded no further.* If it should appear from 
 back for the report, that the objection to the bill was not 
 so much against the principle as against certain 
 details, the committee may be instructed to 
 amend the bill by striking out the objectionable 
 provision?, and report the same as amended. i 
 In one instance, however, they reported that a 
 majority against the preamble had been obtained 
 throuft'h one member ha^dncr voted a^'ainst it in- 
 advertently ; and the instruction of the House 
 having afforded him an opportunity of correcting 
 his vote, he had done so, and this having given 
 a majority in favor of the preamble, the committee 
 reported the bill.J In other cases, the commit- 
 tee having been directed to report the evidence 
 on which iheir adverse decision was founded, re- 
 ported the same, and it was referred to a commit, 
 tee of the whole, with the bill, and the bill was 
 reported and passed.^ 
 
 It is in the po-'ver of the committee to make 
 alterations in the preamble, || either by striking 
 out or modifying such allegations as may not have 
 
 Alterations 
 in pream- 
 ble. 
 
 * Cornwall By-law, 1856; Metropolitan Gas and Water Co., 
 1857 ; St. Lawrence and B&y Chaleura Land Co., 1358 ; Peter* 
 boro' and Port Hope Railway, 1862. 
 
 t Richelieu Company, 1862. 
 
 t Three Rivers diocese church-rate, 1852-3. 
 
 § Clarke survey, 1857 ; Bruce County town, 1864. 
 
 II May, p. 723. 
 
COMMITTEE OX BILL. 
 
 85 
 
 ear from 
 \Yas not 
 t certain 
 icted to 
 :;tionable 
 lended.i 
 id that a 
 obtained 
 list it in- 
 e House 
 Drrecting 
 ng given 
 )mniittee 
 commit- 
 evidence 
 iided, re- 
 comm^t- 
 bill was 
 
 to make 
 
 striking 
 
 not have 
 
 Water Co., 
 !58; Peter- 
 
 been substantiated to their satisfaction, or by ex- 
 punging such as the promoters may be desirous inp?eamb°o 
 of withdrawing ; * but no now allegations or 
 provisions ought to be inserted, either in the pre- 
 amble or the bill, excepting such as are covered 
 ])y the petition and the notice, as proved before 
 the Standing Orders Committee, — unless the par- 
 ties have received permission from the House to 
 introduce such additional provisions, in com- 
 pliance with a petition for leave. f Every ma- 
 terial alteration in the preamble must be specially 
 reported to the House, with the reasons therefor.;): 
 Such alterations have almost invariably hitherto 
 been of a nature to Imiit or reduce the jiowers 
 X:>ropoFed to be conferred by the bill.§ An ex- 
 ception was made, however, in the case of a bill 
 for the relief of the Ministers of a certain religious 
 denomination in JViontreal, in 1857, || — the pre- 
 amble and provisions of which were amended so 
 as to apj)ly to all ministers of that denomination 
 in Lower Canada; and it was passed in the 
 
 • Sherwood, p. 53. 
 
 f May, p. 721. See also 64th Rule. 
 
 t 65th Rule. 
 
 § St. Hyacinthe incorporation, 1852-3 ; Upper Canada 
 Mining Co., 1852-3; Toronto Bank, 1854-5; Frelighaburg 
 Grammar School, 1857; St. Gabriel deValcartier division, 1861; 
 Renfrew By-law, 1863. 
 
 II Bill for relief of Ministers of the Church of the " Countess 
 
 of Huntingdon's Connexion" at Montreal, 1857. 
 8 
 
86 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 " Previous 
 Question" 
 cannot bo 
 put. 
 
 Preamble 
 proved. 
 
 Proceed- 
 ings on 
 clauses. 
 
 amended form. (But see the remarks as to the 
 limitation of the power of the committee to make 
 amendments, on p. 91.) 
 
 It is a rule of Parliamentary practice, that the 
 " previous question" cannot be put in committees, 
 /. e., that if the question were proposed that the 
 preamble is proved, it is not competent for a 
 member to propose the previoTis question " that 
 that question be noiv put," for the purpose of 
 voting against it. The same rule applies, of 
 course, to the clauses, and to any amendments 
 X^roposed.* 
 
 When the committee have decided that the 
 preamble has been proved, they call in the parties, 
 acquaint them vrith the decision, and then go 
 through the bill, clause by clause, and fill up the 
 blanks ; and when petitions have been presented 
 against a clause, or proposing amendments, or for 
 compensation, the parties are heard in support of 
 their objections, or amendments, or claims, as 
 they arise. Clauses may be postponed, and con- 
 sidered at a later period in the proceedings, if the 
 committee think fit ; or clauses which the parties 
 have agreed to insert in the bill may, if neces- 
 sary, be produced before the comndttee decide 
 on the preamble.! Manuscript clauses are con- 
 
 * May» PP- 364, 473 ; Frere. p. 49. 
 t May, p. 720 : Bristowe, p. 29. 
 
COMMITTEE OX BILL. 
 
 87 
 
 5 to the 
 o make 
 
 hat the 
 nittees, 
 hat the 
 t for a 
 L "that 
 pose of 
 lies, of 
 dments 
 
 :hat the 
 
 parties, 
 
 hen go 
 
 up the 
 
 esented 
 
 s, or for 
 
 )port of 
 
 ims, as 
 
 lid con- 
 
 s, if the 
 
 parties 
 
 neces- 
 
 decide 
 
 ire con- 
 
 sidered after those printed in the bill, first those 
 
 proposed by the promoters, and afterwards snch 
 
 as may be proposed by the opponents of the bill.* 
 
 If any unusual provisions are found in the bill, Unusual 
 
 or :.iiy that do not appear to have been contem- P'"°'"^"*"'- 
 
 plated in the notice, special mention is to be made 
 
 of them in the report. f 
 
 In the case of any bill sent down from the Evidence 
 Senate, the committee, if they have not sufficient fr°om* ^ 
 evidence before them, can direct their chairman ^®°***' 
 to move in the House that a message be sent to 
 their Honors, requesting that the proofs and evi- 
 dence on whicli the bill was founded may be 
 communicated ; and these, when sent down, are 
 referred to the committee. J; 
 
 In filling up the blanks in the bill, the commit- Rates of 
 
 , • 1 J. ■ J. J 1 • 1 toll or fees. 
 
 tee are required to insert the maximum rates 
 of toll, fees, or other charges to be imposed un- 
 der its provisions, which are printed in the bill 
 in italics, for the information of the House, but 
 are technically regarded as blanks. § A prac- 
 tice obtained occasionally, for some years, of re- 
 quiring the rates of toll proposed to be inserted in 
 
 * Frere, pp. 54, 61. 
 
 t Montreal Building Society ; Montreal Gas Co. j Toronto 
 Dry Dock ; various Mining Bills : all in 1847. See also 64th Rule. 
 
 t Counters stove patent, 1850; Niagara and Detroit R'vers 
 Railroad, 1859; Quebec Tilots, 1860. 
 
 § May, p. 070. 
 
88 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 Rates of 
 toll, Ac 
 
 Harbour, Bridge, or Canal Bills, to be first sanc- 
 tioned in a committee of the whole, and after- 
 wards referred to the committee on the bill for 
 insertion therein. This appears to have been the 
 usral course prior to the Union, but upon the 
 ado ,ition of a system of Private Bill legislation, it 
 was discontmued. In the Session of 1852-3, this 
 practice was resorted to in a bill to incorporate 
 the Port Burw^ell Harbour Company* and was 
 subsequently observed in several instances ; 
 though it was always the exception rather than 
 the rule. The inconvenience of this practice is 
 most evident, as it is manifest that the committee 
 of the whole can, at that early stage of the bill, 
 have no sufficient evidence to guide them in es- 
 tablishing the rates of toll ; while on the other 
 hand, the committee on the bill have it in their 
 jpower to procure all necessary information : when 
 they report the amended bill, it is referred (after 
 the second reading) to a committee of the whole, 
 and an opportunity afforded to the House of ex- 
 ercising its judgment in the matter. Moreover 
 tolls of this kind are imposed only upon such per- 
 sons as mij voluntarily use the works to be con- 
 structed under the authority of the bill, as a fair 
 equivalent for a service rendered, and are thus 
 altogether different in their character from a com- 
 
 * i^£semb]y Jouin., 1852-3, pp. 2G9, 285. 
 
 W 
 
COMMITTF.E OX BILL. 
 
 89 
 
 it sanc- 
 
 I after- 
 bill for 
 len the 
 )on the 
 tion, it 
 -3, this 
 rporate 
 id was 
 :aiices ; 
 E>r than 
 ctice is 
 imittee 
 tie bill, 
 n ill cs- 
 e other 
 
 II their 
 : when 
 I (after 
 
 whole, 
 3 of ex- 
 ^reoyer 
 ch per- 
 be con- 
 .s a fair 
 re thus 
 
 a com- 
 
 pulsory rate, duty, or charge upon the people, Rates of 
 which should undoubtedly originate in a commit- 
 tee of the whole.* Furthermore, while the rule, 
 AS regards rates, duties, etc., inserted in public 
 bills, is strictly observed in the Imperial Parlia- 
 ment, all private bills are exemi^t from its opera- 
 tion, including even those under which a local 
 rate is proposed to be levied for a local work.f 
 In 1862, the Committee on Private Bills i^resented 
 a report, recommending that the exceptional 
 practice referred to bo discontinued,! and the 
 recommendation has since been generally acted 
 upon. 
 
 The amendments made by the committee are Amend- 
 written upon a printed copy of the bill, which is ported to* 
 signed by the chairman, who also signs, with his * ® '^"^** 
 
 * Three Rivers Diocese Church Rate, 1852-3. 
 
 t In 1833, a committee of the Commons (G. B.), appointed 
 to examine into precedents in connection with this subject re- 
 ported "that the general spirit of the Standing Orders and Reso- 
 " lutions of the House, requires that every proposition to impose 
 ''a burthen or charge on any class or portion of the people, 
 '^ should receive its first discussion in a committee of the whole 
 " House. The only exception from this rule is with regard to 
 " tolls, rates, or duties proposed to be levied on the subject in 
 *' particular places for any local work ; and in such cases it is 
 " directed that no bill be ordered to be brought in till the peti- 
 " tion for it has been referred to a committee, and they have ex- 
 " amined the matter thereof, and reported the same to the 
 *' House." May (edition of 1844), p. 275. 
 
 X 18th Rep. of Cora, on Private Bills, L. A., 18G2. 
 
90 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 Amend- 
 ments re- 
 ported to 
 thj House 
 
 Iji^ 
 
 initials, each amendment made, and clause added, 
 and another copy of the bill as amended is fyled 
 in the Private Bill Office.* The committee, in 
 reporting the bill, call the attention of the House 
 to any provision that does not appear to have 
 been contemplated in the notice,! or to any pro- 
 vision of an unusual character,! and if they have 
 amended the bill in such a manner as to confine 
 its provisions within the terms of the notice, § or 
 otherwise to restrict the same, || it is usually 
 mentioned in the report. It is customary also to 
 make special mention of any amendment of a 
 peculiar or unusual character, as, changing the 
 name of a proposed corporation,^ — extending 
 the limits of a township proposed to be erect- 
 ed,** — or materially altering certain arrange- 
 ments provided for by the bilLff In 1858, the 
 
 * 67th Rule. 
 
 f G4th Rule. See also Three Rivers Corporation, 1864. 
 
 t Quebec Pilots' Corporation, 1866. 
 
 § Middlesex debt, 1854-5. 
 
 II Toronto and Goderich Railway, 1851 ; London debt, 
 1856 ; Martin's Saltfleet road allowance, 1856 ; Fitzroy Survey, 
 1863. 
 
 IF Canadian Life and Fire Insurance Co., 1856 j Colonial 
 Bank, 1856. 
 
 *• Franklin Township, 1857. 
 
 tt London town lot (Agricultural Societies), 1856 ; Crow- 
 land Survey, 1862 ; Bellelsle's relief, 1863 ; Foley's admi33ion 
 as Barrister, 1864. 
 
e added, 
 is fyled 
 ittee, in 
 c HouiSo 
 to have 
 any pro- 
 .ey have 
 > confine 
 tice,§ or 
 usually 
 y also to 
 ent of a 
 >'ing the 
 [tending- 
 be erect- 
 arrange- 
 858, the 
 
 18G4. 
 
 idon debt, 
 oy Survey, 
 
 ; Colonial 
 
 56 ; Crow- 
 admission 
 
 COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 91 
 
 committee reported a bill to detach certain lots hi 
 the township of Barton f';om the city of Hamilton, amon'd- 
 which they had so amended as to provide for ™""'«- 
 continuing the lots in question within the limits 
 of the city at a limited rate of taxation ; they also 
 reported a bill to provide for the separation of the 
 Counties of Durham and Northumberland, 
 amended in such a manner as to leave the ques- 
 tion of separation, &c., to the decision of the 
 reeves and deputy reeves of the County of Dur- 
 ham. In 1864, they amended a bill to erect the 
 Local Municipality of St. Colombe mto a County 
 Municipality, in such a w^ay as merely to extend 
 the powers of the said municipality in regard to 
 the issuing of tavern and shop licences. 
 
 The power of the committee to make amend- Limitation 
 ments is, how^ever, limited ; care must be taken to make 
 in preparing them, that they involve no infrac- m'entV 
 tion of the Standing Orders, and are not ex- 
 cessive.* No new provisions may be intro- 
 
 * May, p. 681. Questions have frequently arisen (in the 
 Imperial House of Commons) as to the right of a committee on 
 a Railway Bill to alter the plan, which under the Standing Or- 
 ders is required to be deposited in the Private Bill OflBce. The 
 rules and practice of Parliament recognize this power, but the 
 committee, before adopting any deviation from the line delinea- 
 ted on the plan, require proof of the consent of the owners or 
 occupiers through whose property the proposed deviation will 
 paas. Sherwood, p. 57. 
 
02 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 Material 
 
 : lit! 
 
 ! i 
 
 ! I 
 
 duced by which tho interest of i^arties who are 
 not suitors to the bill, or petitioners before tho 
 committee, can be affected, without due notico 
 having been given to such parties.* If the com- 
 alterations, mittce cousidcr a moterial alteration desirable in 
 a particular bill (of such a nature as appears to ex- 
 ceed their powers), they report the bill, and suggest 
 such alterations as may meet the supposed neces- 
 sity.! Ill 1852-3, a bill to incorporate the Mutual 
 Insurance Association for the Fabriques of tho 
 Diocese of Quebec, was reported, with a recom- 
 mendation that the principle should be extended 
 to each Diocese in Lower Canada ; and the bill 
 was amended accordingly, and passed. In 1860. 
 in reporting on a bill to incorj^orate the Annuity 
 and Guarantee Funds Society of the Bank of 
 Montreal, the committee expressed their opinion 
 that it was advisable to make it a general measure, 
 applicable to any other Hank and its employ(?s. 
 The suggestion was not, however, adopted by 
 the House, and the bill was proceeded with and 
 passed, as a private bill. In some cases, where 
 the committee have considered an amendment of 
 the general law preferable to the passage of pri- 
 
 * Fiere, p. G4. 
 
 t B, N. American Mining Co., 1847; Bill to remove the 
 Registry Office for the County of Terrebonne, 1847. In this 
 last mentionefl case, a division of the county for registration 
 purposes was suggested, instead of a removal. 
 
COMMITTEE ON BILL. 
 
 93 
 
 who are 
 
 fore the 
 le notice 
 the com- 
 ijirable iu 
 !ars to ex- 
 d suggef^t 
 ed neces- 
 e Mutual 
 es of the 
 , a recom- 
 extended 
 d the bill 
 
 In 1860. 
 I Annuity 
 
 Bank of 
 ir opinion 
 [ measure, 
 employ(?s. 
 lopted by 
 with and 
 3s, where 
 idment of 
 ^e of pri- 
 
 I remove the 
 
 i7. In this 
 
 registration 
 
 vate acts, they have made a special rei)ort to that 
 effect, and (occasionally) postponed the considera- 
 tion of the bills to which it had reference, to af- 
 ford an opportunity for the action of the House in 
 the matter ;* or, in other cases, they have ex- 
 punged certain provisions, and recommended an 
 amendment of the general law^n these respects. f 
 In 1867-8 (after Confederation), the question ofQicsion 
 jurisdiction having been raised before them wdth tior. 
 regard to certain hills, they in one case J solicited 
 an instruction from the House, which, not being 
 given, the bill was not proceeded with : in two 
 other cases § they amended the bills and reported 
 them, calling attention, in their report, to the 
 doubts raised ; one of these bills was subse- 
 quently proceeded with, and the other abandoned. 
 (See Chapter on " Legislative Jurisdiction," ante.) 
 The committee have nothing to do with the title of 
 the bill, which is only agreed to by the House 
 after the third reading, || 
 
 * Various bills for the admission of English attorneys to 
 practise in Canada ; also various bills for incorporating Mining 
 Companies, 1854-5. (No action was taken on the reports, and the 
 consideration of the bills being subsequently resumed, they were 
 reported and passed.) Joliette incorporation, 18G3. 
 
 t Kingsey Falls Municipality, 1864 ; DeLery Gold Mining 
 Co., 1865; Quebec Corporation, 1865. 
 
 t Civil Service Building Society, 1867-8. 
 
 § Stratford Board of Trade, and Canada Live Stock Insur- 
 ance Co., 1867-8. 
 
 II Frere, p. 66. 
 
94 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 Abandon- 
 ment of a 
 
 Power to Power may be ffiven to the committee by the 
 
 divide or . 
 
 to consoii- House to divide a bill into two bills, or to consoli- 
 date two bills referred to them into one.* This 
 last has sometimes been done by the committee, 
 without a special Instruction.! 
 
 Every V)ill referred io the committee must be 
 
 bill by its reporteil.t If the promoters of any bill inform 
 
 promoters. x -i a j 
 
 the committee that they do not desire to proceed 
 further with it, the fact is reported to the House, § 
 and the bill will be ordered to be withdrawn ;|| 
 or if any other parties before the committee, 
 either as petitioners or opponents of the bill, desire 
 to proceed with it, the committee may permit 
 them to do so.l In 1867-8, the Committee on 
 Banking and Commerce reported, with regard to 
 9, bill to incorporate the Canadian Mutual Life 
 Insurance Co., that the principle of mutual life 
 
 • Frere, p. G5. 
 
 t St. Albert de Vv''arwick Municipality, 1863. (In 1864 several 
 petitions relating to municipalities in Arthabaska and "Wolfe, 
 were combined into one bill by the promoters.) 
 
 t 65th Rule. 
 
 § St. Lawrence Mining Co., 1852-3; Ottawa Water Works, 
 1866; Gait and Guelph Railway, 1866; Toronto and Owen 
 Sound Railway, 1866 ; North-west Transportation Co., 1866. 
 
 il May, p. 726. 
 
 IT The Manchester and Salford improvement Bill, in 1828, 
 was abandoned in committee by its original promoters ; when its 
 opponents, having succeeded in introducing certain amendments, 
 undertook to solicit its further progress. May, p. 633. (Note.) 
 
?e by the 
 o consoli- 
 e.* This 
 jmmittee, 
 
 must 1)0 
 U inform 
 proceed 
 e House, § 
 hdrawn :|| 
 ommittee, 
 )ill, desire 
 ay permit 
 mi t tee on 
 
 regard to 
 itual Life 
 utual life 
 
 1 864 several 
 I and Wolfe, 
 
 ater Works, 
 ) and Owen 
 ;o., 1866. 
 
 iill, in 1828, 
 jrs ; when its 
 amendments, 
 33. (Note.) 
 
 COMMITTEE ON BILL. 95 
 
 iiisur.Mice being new to this country, they could 
 not recommend its adoption unless a paid up 
 liuarantee capital of at least ^50,000 was pro- 
 vided ; and as the promoters were not prepared 
 to do this, they had al>andoned the ])ill. 
 A bill, after it has been reported, may be referred Bin may b* 
 
 '' referred 
 
 hack to the same committee,'*' or to some other back, 
 committee! but this is very rarely done. 
 
 The evidence taken by the committee is not Evidence 
 gonerally reported to the House, except in those ed, without 
 cases where a special order to that effect may be 
 made ; :j: it is entered in a book, with the minutes 
 of the proceedings of the committee, and kei)t in 
 the Private Bill Office; but in some instances the 
 committee have rei)orted their proceedings with- 
 out an order being made.§ 
 
 If the amendments made by the committee are so BiUmay be 
 
 ro-printed. 
 
 important or extensive as to render it necessary that 
 it should be reprinted before its consideration by the 
 House, this is done at the expense of the promoters.|| 
 
 * Maskinonge Common, 1852-3 ; Strathroy and Port Frank 
 Railway, 1857 ; Streetsville incorporation, 1858 ; Lindsay Re- 
 serve, 1859; Hamilton debt, 1863 (Aug. Scss.); St, Colombe 
 Municipality, and other bills, 1864. 
 
 t Canadian Land and Emigration Co., 1865 (Jan. Sess.) ; 
 Ashley's naturalization, ib. 
 
 t Great Southern Railway, 1857. See also supra, p. 83. 
 
 § Buffalo and Lake Huron Railway, 1856; Grand Trunk 
 Railway, 1862 ; Montreal and Champlain Railroad, 1864. 
 
 II This is required in all cases, in the Imperial Parliament, ' 
 
 when the bill is amended. May, p. 728, 
 
96 
 
 Time for 
 
 reports 
 
 limited. 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE. 
 
 The 49th Rule, ^A^hile it Hmits the imie for re- 
 ceiving petitions and private bills, respectively, 
 also provides that no report of any standing or 
 select committee ■ai)on.a private bill be received 
 after the first six weeks, but this i^eriod is in- 
 variably extended until nearly the close of the 
 Session. 
 
97 
 
 ne for ly- 
 pectively, 
 Hiding or 
 J received 
 •iod is in- 
 ►se of the 
 
 ll.-SECOND READINa OF BILL. 
 
 By the 66th Hule of the House of Commons, 
 'Jl priw te bills rex)orted from a standing com- Jec'^n/'^'^ 
 mittee are placed on the Orders of the Day "a^ing. 
 following the reception of the report,^ for a 
 second reading, next after bills referred to a com- 
 mittee of the whole House, — though they are 
 usually taken up only on "Private Bill" days; the 
 only exception being in the case of bills on v^hich 
 the committee have reported the preamble not 
 proven, which are not placed on the Orders of 
 the Day at all, unless by special order of the 
 House. 
 
 Tne second reading corresponds with the same PHncipia 
 stage in other bills, and in agreeing to it the armed X 
 House affirms the principle of the measure.f ^^^^ stage. 
 There is an important distinction between public 
 
 * In 1861, and in several subsequent Sessions, the commit- 
 tee, in reporting certain bills at a late period of the Session, re- 
 commended that they be placed on ** the Orders of this day," 
 which was done accordingly. Assembly Journ., ISGl, p. 293, 
 &c., &c. 
 
 t May, p. 456. 
 9 
 
98 
 
 SECOND READING OF BILL. 
 
 Recent 
 change. 
 
 and private bills at this stage of the proceedings ; 
 a public bill being founded on reasons of i)ublic 
 policy, the House, in agreeing to its second read- 
 ing, accepts and affirms those reasons; but the 
 expediency of a private bill is mainly founded 
 upon allegations of fact, to be proved before a 
 committee. It was formerly the practice, in each 
 House, to refer the bill after the second reading ; 
 the affirmation of the principle of the bill, there- 
 fore, was necessary conditional, being contingent 
 upon satisfactory proof being made of the allega- 
 tions of the preamble. In 1867, the House of 
 Commons changed their liule in this respect, and 
 provided for a reference of the bill after the^^rs^ 
 reading,"' — the second reading being postponed 
 until after the committee had reported. By this 
 arrangement the House is put in possession, before 
 the second reading, of the facts of the case, and is 
 therefore in a position to deal with the bill upon 
 its merits. This change has not been adopted as 
 yet, by the Senate, and bills before that House are 
 referred, as heretofore, after the second reading, f 
 The usual time for counsel to be heard at the 
 Counsel, "g^^ q£ ^^q Housc ui)on a bill {pro or con) is at the 
 second reading ; but opposition has rarely been 
 offered, hitherto, at this stage, unless upon 
 the assumi^tion that the princii)le of the proposed 
 
 Hearing of 
 
 'm 
 
 * 59th Rule, Commons, 
 t 59th Rule, Senate. 
 
/ 
 
 eedinffs ; 
 'f public 
 nd read- 
 but the 
 founded 
 before a 
 , in each 
 readini? • 
 11, there- 
 ntingent 
 le allega- 
 House of 
 3ect, and 
 ' the first 
 :)stponed 
 By this 
 n, before 
 se, and is 
 Dill upon 
 .opted as 
 [ouse are 
 eading.f 
 I'd at the 
 is at the 
 jly been 
 ss upon 
 proposed 
 
 SECO^D READING OF BILL. 
 
 measure was objectionable on grounds of x:>ublic 
 policy.* Upon four occasions only, in Canada, 
 has counsel been heard at the Bar against the 
 second reading of private bills. f In one in- 
 stance, J the House resolved (upon joetitions from 
 the parties) to hear counsel, for and against the bill, 
 upon the question for going into committee of the 
 whole thereon : this having been (under the ar- 
 rangements then in force) the first opportunity 
 afforded for the action of the House after the re- 
 port of the committee, corresi^onded, in point of 
 fact (as regarded the time for hearing opj^osition) 
 with the second r'^ading under the new arrange- 
 ment. The bill having been reported by the 
 committee with amendments, they were directed 
 to report the evidence, and the same was x^rinted, 
 with the bill in its amended shape. The Order 
 of the Day for the House in committee on the bill, 
 being read, counsel was called in and heard: it 
 
 * Sherwood, p. 37. The Street Rail Com'y Bill [was thrown 
 out on the second reading, in the British House of Commons, 
 16th April, 1861, on notice beiug taken that it trenched on 
 public rights. In England it is the duty of the Chairman of 
 Committee of Ways and Means, under a standing order, to call 
 the attention of the House to all such cases. Hansard's 
 Debates, vol. 162, p. 641. 
 
 t University of Toronto (King's College) Bill, (a Mini3terial 
 private bill), 1843, 1814-5, and 1846; Montreal Consumers' 
 Gas Co., 1846. 
 
 X Great Southern Railway, 1857. 
 
 99 
 
100 
 
 SECOND EEADING OF BILL. 
 
 Priyate 
 
 .i!ii I 
 
 was then moved " that this House will resolve it- 
 self into the said committee on this day three 
 months :" the consideration of this motion was 
 postponed, and the bill was subsequently aban- 
 doned. It may be here observed, that a motion 
 to postpone the consideration of a bill for three 
 or six months, offered at any stage, is, if agreed 
 to, equivalent to a rejection of the bill for that 
 Session.* 
 Private Bills on the Orders of the Day, in the 
 Bifrdays, House of Commous, are called up on Mondays, 
 Commons, jiximediately after the daily routine of business ; 
 on "Wednesdays and Fridays they are called for 
 the first hour, at the evening sitting ; while on 
 Tuesdays and Thursdays they do not appear on 
 the Orders at all.f Private Bills in the hands 
 of members of the Administration, are placed 
 among the " Government Orders" on Government 
 days (Tuesdays and Fridays). In the Senate, no 
 days are specially appointed for the consideration 
 of private bills, but they come up from day to day, 
 according to their relative position upon the 
 Orders of the Day. 
 
 * May, p. 673. 
 
 t 19th Rule, Commons. 
 
101 
 
 solve it- 
 ay three 
 don was 
 ly aban- 
 i motion 
 )r three 
 f agreed 
 for that 
 
 ^, in the 
 [ondays, 
 •usiness ; 
 ailed for 
 tvhile on 
 ppear on 
 le hands 
 placed 
 ernment 
 >nate, no 
 deration 
 ly to day, 
 pon the 
 
 12.— PJlOCEEDINaS IN COMMITTEE OF 
 
 THE WHOLE. 
 
 All Private Bills, after the second reading, arc Reference 
 at once referred to a committee of the whole mittee of 
 House, for consideration on some future day. "^ ^^^^^^ 
 Several bills may be considered in committee at 
 the same time.f 
 
 Counsel may be heard at the Bar of the House, Hearing of 
 at this or any other stage,t but the usual time is 
 at the second reading. (See Remarks on this sub- 
 ject, under " Second Reading of Bill," ante, p. 98.) 
 
 It may be well to remark here, that while it is, 
 of course, comj)etent to the House to amend or 
 
 * This differs from the practice in the Imperial Parliament, 
 where such private bills as are reported without amendment are 
 ordered for a third reading j while those reported with amend- 
 ments are referred to the Chairman of Ways and Means, and the 
 Speaker's Counsel, to report whether (in their amended form) 
 Ihey contain the provisions recjuired by the Standing Orders, 
 &c. May, p. 729. 
 
 t May, p. 467. Also, Assembly Journ., 1860, p. 445; 1861, 
 p. 319; 166.3 (Aug. Sees.), p. 173; 1864, p. 373; 1865 (Jan. 
 Seas.), p. 234 ; 1866, p. 195. 
 May, p. 460. 
 
102 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 ':> :\ 
 
 ph 'I ' 
 II''' '■ ■ 
 [I'jr 
 
 Amend- 
 ments of 
 select com- 
 mittees 
 generally 
 accepted 
 by the 
 House. 
 
 Evidence 
 of Speaker 
 ofH. ofC. 
 on this 
 subject. 
 
 All 
 
 reject any bill after it has been reported by a select 
 committee, and to amend or reject any of the 
 pmendments agreed to by the committee, prac- 
 tically this right is rarely exercised. The inabil- 
 ity of the House to discuss a private bill ui^on its 
 merits in the absence of such information as evi- 
 dence alone can supply, renders its reference to a 
 Kelect committee indispensable ; and the House 
 practically delegates its responsibility to that com- 
 mittee, and almost invariably accepts their de- 
 cision. The principle thus acted upon by our 
 Canadian Legislature, has been established in the 
 Imperial Parliament as the resiilt of a very long 
 experience in private bill legislation. The Right 
 Hon. John E. Denison, Speaker of the H-ouse of 
 Commons, a very high authority in all matters 
 connected w4th either i^ublic or private Par- 
 liamentary business, m his evidence before a com- 
 mittee of that House upon the Business of the 
 House, in 1861, says, in reference to this ques- 
 tion, — " K you look at the precedent of private 
 " legislation, you v^dll see that some few years ago 
 " it was held that it would be quite impossible to 
 '• concede such enormous mterests as railway in- 
 " terests to a committee of five men ; but these 
 " enormous interests, such as the consolidation of 
 " all the railways in the centre of Scotland, which 
 " was discussed before the House of Commons the 
 " other day, and the great question of the docks at 
 
y a select 
 y of the 
 ie, prac- 
 le inabil- 
 ui>on its 
 n as evi- 
 ence to a 
 3 House 
 hat com- 
 their de- 
 1 by our 
 ed in the 
 ery long 
 [le Eight 
 I-ouse of 
 
 matters 
 ate Par- 
 re a com- 
 ss of the 
 his ques- 
 
 private 
 'ears ago 
 )ssible to 
 Iway in- 
 ut these 
 dation of 
 d, which 
 nons the 
 docks at 
 
 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. 
 
 103 
 
 *' Liverpool and the Mersey, now go to five men 
 " appointed by the Committee of Selection, and 
 " practically there is no appeal from their decision, 
 " because the House has been obliged almost to 
 " adopt as a rule that it will not interfere with the 
 "decision of committees."* In a subsequent 
 part of his evidence, after re-iterating this state- 
 ment, he adds, that the House is more disposed 
 to support the decision of the committee, because 
 the smallness of the number of the members in- 
 creases the responsibility of the committee. f 
 
 In pursuance of this principle, the practice has Amend- 
 prevailed of late years, in the Lower House, in ^mSittL 
 the consideration of private bills in committee of j°g*'^™jjjj" 
 the whole, of not treating the amendments made ^^*>^''' 
 by the select committee as amendments, but con- 
 sidering the bill, as amended, as a whole ; thus in 
 reporting the bill to the House, the chairman re- 
 fers only to the amendments made in com- 
 mittee of the whole. Bills from the Senate form 
 a necessary exception to this practice, as every 
 amendment made to the bill as sent down from 
 that House must be communicated for its concur- 
 rence. 
 
 Before the House resolves itself into committee 
 on a bill, an instruction may be given to the com- 
 
 * Report from the Select Committee of the House of Com,- 
 mona, on the business of the House, 1861. (Ans. to Ques. 155.) 
 f Same Report. (Ana. to Ques. 183 to 186, 192.) 
 
■■ 
 
 hi 
 
 104 
 
 InstruvJ- 
 tioDS to 
 committoo 
 of whole. 
 
 Power to 
 amend in 
 committee 
 limited. 
 
 Special iU' 
 8tr action. 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 mittee, empowering them to make provision for 
 any matters not relevant to the subject matter of 
 the bill. An instruction is not ordinarily compnl- 
 sori/, but rather permissive ; a mandatory or com- 
 pulsory instruction may, however, be given, and 
 instances are to be found in which committees on 
 bills have been instructed " that they do make 
 provision," &c., or " do make two bills into one."* 
 An instruction should always be made a distinct 
 question, after the order of the day has been read, 
 and not as an amendment to the question for the 
 Speaker leaving the chair, unless its object be to 
 prevent the sitting of the committee ; as the amend- 
 ment, if agreed to, supers 3des the question for 
 the Speaker leaving the Chair.f No amend- 
 ment which is irrelevant to the bill (as extending 
 its operations beyond the limits expressed in the 
 preamble and title, &c.) can be made without 
 an instruction.! If any amendment be made 
 that is not within the title of the bill, the com- 
 mittee amend the title accordingly, and report the 
 sam3 specially to the House. § 
 
 In the Session of 1852-3, the committee of the 
 whole on the bill to empower the Municipal 
 
 * May, p. 461. 
 f May, p. 362. 
 t May, p. 474. 
 
 § Standing Order, British House of Commons, 19th July, 
 1854. Bristowe, p. 133. 
 
 mg 
 
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. 
 
 105 
 
 ovision for 
 : matter of 
 ily compul 
 ry or com- 
 jiven, and 
 mittees on 
 y do make 
 into one."* 
 ! a distinct 
 been read, 
 ion for the 
 bject be to 
 ;he amend- 
 iiestion for 
 o amend" 
 extendinir 
 5sed in the 
 le without 
 be made 
 the corn- 
 report the 
 
 ttee of the 
 Municipal 
 
 3, 19th July, 
 
 Council of the County of Two Mountains to sub- 
 scribe for stock in any railway passing through 
 that county, was instructed to inquire into the 
 expediency of the extending its provisions to the 
 County of Terrebonne. The bill was amended 
 accordingly and passed, and w^as subsequently 
 amended by the Legisl' ive Council so as to ex- 
 tend its operation also to the counties of Rou- 
 Wlle and Missisquoi. 
 
 When it may be found necessary to insert, in 
 a private bill, a clause affecting the public revenue, 
 property, or credit, the authority therefor must 
 (with the consent of the Government) emanate 
 from a committeee of the whole : thus, in 1866, 
 the Canada Vine G-rowers' Association having 
 applied for an Act of incorporation, a bill was in- 
 troduced and proceeded with in the ordinary way ; 
 and the consent of the Government having been 
 obtained, a Resolution (originatmg in committee 
 of the whole) was passed by the House, exempt- 
 ing the wines made by the Association from 
 excise duties for a term of ten years ; and the 
 Resolution was referred to the committee of the 
 whole on the bill, to make the necessary provision 
 therein. In 1867-8, this exemption was extended 
 for a further period of two years, — the same 
 course being taken as before. 
 
 "When it is intended to propose any important 
 amendment in committee of the whole, or at the 
 
 Clauses 
 afifeoting 
 public re- 
 
 venue,&Cv 
 originate 
 in com- 
 mittee of 
 whole. 
 
 Notice to 
 be given of 
 ameud- 
 mentd' 
 
j'ill 
 
 Ir ;'i: 
 
 Hi! 
 
 106 
 
 PROCEEDINGH IN 
 
 Course of 
 proceeding 
 in commit- 
 tee of the 
 whole. 
 
 Amend- 
 ments, 
 
 Glauses 
 postponed. 
 
 third reading, one day's notice thereof must Le 
 given.* 
 
 In the committee of the whole, the same course 
 is adopted as in the select committee, — the question 
 being proposed on the preamble first, f The 
 chairman then reads the number of each clause 
 in succession, with the marghial note which ex- 
 plains its objects. If no amendment be offered to 
 a clause, he at once puts the question, '• That this 
 clause stand part of the bill," and proceeds to the 
 next. When an amendment is proposed, he 
 states the line in which the alteration is to be 
 made, and puts the question in the ordinary form. 
 No amendment can be made to a clause after the 
 committee has passed on to another clause ; nor 
 can any amendment be offered to any clause which 
 is irrelevant to the subject matter of such clause 
 but the same should be submitted, as a separate ^® ^\ 
 clause, at the end of the bill.J Clauses may be 
 postponed, unless they have been amended, when 
 it is not regular to postpone them. Postponed 
 
 clausi 
 (lispo! 
 broujj 
 the w 
 man t 
 AVheii 
 chain 
 bill w 
 inente 
 sitting 
 Speak 
 chain 
 chair, 
 
 had g( 
 ments 
 the b 
 witno 
 
 close 
 eave 
 
 y 
 
 * 68th Rule. In the Commons of G. B., every such amend- 
 ment is also, in ail cases involving a necessity therefor, referred 
 to the Committee en Standing Orders for their report. May, p. 
 728. 
 
 f In this respect di6fering from the course pursued upon 
 public bills, the preamble of which is postponed until the clauses 
 have been settled. 
 
 i May, p. 469. 
 
 )emg 
 
 Iloust 
 
 3ook 
 
 t is Ih 
 
 )oint 
 
 eed ^ 
 
 • Ma; 
 \ Ma 
 
[ must l>e 
 
 me course 
 e question 
 it t The 
 ach clause 
 which ex- 
 5 offered to 
 ' That this 
 »eds to the 
 posed, he 
 11 is to be 
 nary form, 
 e after the 
 ause; nor 
 luse which 
 ich clause 
 
 es may be 
 ded, when 
 Postponed 
 
 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. 
 
 107 
 
 clauses are considered after the other clauses are 
 disposed oi, and before any new clauses are 
 brought \\\). If the committee cannot go through Report, 
 the whole bill at one sitting, they direct the chair- 
 man to report progress, and ask leave to sit again. 
 When the bill has been fully considered, the 
 chairman puts a question, " That I do report this 
 bill without amendment," or " with the amend- 
 ments, to the House ;" which being agreed to, the 
 sitting of the committee is concluded, and Mr 
 Speaker resumes the chair : ui^on which the 
 chairman approaches the steps of the Speaker's 
 chair, and reports from the committee that " they 
 had gone through the bill and had made amend- 
 ments thereto," or that " they had gone through 
 the bill and directed him to report the same 
 witnout amendment." * Sometimes, however, 
 
 a separate ^^® proceedings of a committee are brought to a 
 
 close by an order " That the chairman do now 
 eave the chair ;" in which case the chairman, 
 )eing without instructions, makes no report to the 
 [fouse, and the bill disappears from the Order 
 
 such amend- ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^ generally regarded as defunct ; but 
 
 t is nevertheless competent for the House to ap- 
 
 ort. May, p. )oint another day for the committee, and to pro- 
 
 ieed with the bill.f 
 pursued upon 
 
 til the clauses , ,, .^^ 
 
 May, p. 476. 
 
 \ May, p. 476. 
 
■■;'1V 
 
 Proceed - 
 lags after 
 report. 
 
 108 PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE. 
 
 When the chairman has reported the bill to the 
 House, the entire bill is open to consideration, 
 and amendments may be made, and new clauses 
 added (of which due notice has been given, as 
 above mentioned), or the bill may be re-committed 
 for further amendment.* If amendments have 
 been made in committee, the question is at once 
 put upon each amendment, in the order in which 
 it stands in the bill ; or the consideration of the 
 bill, as reported, may be postponed to a future 
 day. If any of the amendments are supposed to 
 be in excess of the Notice given by the promoters 
 of the bill, the proper course is to refer them to 
 the Committee on Standing Orders for their re- 
 port.! 
 
 When the bill has been reported, and the 
 Third read- amendments made in committee (if any) have 
 
 ing order- , . ^ '^ ' 
 
 od- been disposed of by the House, it is ordered for a 
 
 third reading on the following day. The practice 
 of engrossing on parchment, all bills ordered for 
 a third reading, was discontinued in 1851, when 
 both Houses agreed to substitute bills i)rinted by 
 the Queen's Printer, for the engrossed copies : a 
 further change was made in 1862, when the 
 printing of these bills was transferred to the Par 
 liamentary contractors, with whom it still remains 
 
 ♦ May, p. 478. 
 
 t Ottawa & Prescott Railway, 1865 (Jan. Sesa.); Cobour 
 & Peterboro' Railway, 1865 (A.ug. Sess.) 
 
 
100 
 
 bill to the 
 dderatioii, 
 i\v clauses 
 
 given, as 
 iommittod 
 ents have 
 
 is at once 
 r in which 
 ion of the 
 to a future 
 ipposed to 
 promoters 
 ;er them to 
 3r their re- 
 
 , and the 
 any) have 
 dered for 
 he practice 
 ordered for 
 851, when 
 l)rinted by 
 . copies : 
 when the 
 to the Par- 
 ;ill remains 
 
 33.); Cobourg 
 
 13.— TllirvlJ liEADING OF BILL. 
 
 Private bills on the Orders oi the Day for a xime for 
 third reading, take precedence, on Private Bill '^^^ '^°*'*- 
 days (sec remarks under "Second reading of Bill"' 
 supra, p. 100) of all other Orders."'* At this stage 
 it is not customary to make any amendments but 
 such as are merely verbal ; no important amend- 
 ment may be proposed without one day's notice 
 thereof:! if it be considered necessary, the order 
 for the third reading* may be discharged, and the 
 bill re-committed. 
 
 This is usually the stage at which the Queen's Rights of 
 consent is signified to any bill affecting the Y>ro- ^^* ^"^'^°' 
 party or interests of the Crown .J 
 
 The order for the third readini? beini? read, the Passage 
 member in charge of the bill moves 1st, " That 
 the bill be now read a third time; 2nd, " That the 
 bill do now pass, and that the title be," &c. The 
 
 * 20th Rule, Commons. 48th Rule, Senate, 
 t 63th Rule (both). 
 t May, p. 732. 
 10 
 
^PPfiUPIl 
 
 ii 
 
 iitfi 
 
 PI 
 
 i 
 
 iili 
 
 
 ! 
 
 I! I 
 
 M\ 
 
 no 
 
 No Stand- 
 ing Order 
 eufpended 
 trithout 
 notice. 
 
 Bills 
 amended 
 by Senate. 
 
 Amend- 
 ments re- 
 ferred, in 
 certain 
 cases. 
 
 THIICD READING OF BILL. 
 
 Clerk is then ordered to carry the oill to the 
 Senate, and desire their concurrence. 
 
 Every stage of a private bill, in its passage 
 through the House of Commons, has now been 
 described. It may be here mentioned, that, in 
 accordance with the practice on public bills, a 
 bill may, upon urgent and extraordinary occa- 
 sions, be advanced two or more stages in one day,^ 
 but except in cases of urgent and x^ressing neces- 
 sity, no motion may be made to dispense with 
 any Standing Order relative to private bills with- 
 out due no^'^e,t printed in the Votes. 
 
 Ifa bill bo subsequently returned from the Senate 
 with amendments, the member in charge (or any 
 other member acting for him) moves " That the 
 amendments made by the Senate to the Bill (title) 
 be now taken into coi^sideratidn." They are then 
 read by the Clerk a first time, and if merely 
 verbal or unimportant, they are read a second 
 time, and may be at once agreed to ; the Clerk is 
 then ordered to carry the bill to the Senate. If 
 any of the amendments be important, they are 
 referred to the Standing Committee to which the 
 bill was originally referred,^ and all further pro- 
 
 * 43rd Rule. 
 
 t 70th Rule. 
 
 t 69th Rule. See Guelph & Lake Huron Railway, 1864 ; 
 St. Charles Bridge, 1866 ; Port Hope, L'nd-iay & Beavertoa 
 Railway, 1866. 
 
THIRD READING OF BILL. 
 
 Ill 
 
 to the 
 
 passage 
 )W been 
 
 that, ill 
 3 bills, a 
 iry oc ca- 
 ne day,* 
 iq: neces- 
 ise with 
 lis with- 
 
 .e Senate 
 ! (or any 
 That the 
 Bill (title) 
 
 are then 
 f merely 
 I second 
 
 Clerk is 
 nate. If 
 
 they are 
 i^hich the 
 ther pro- 
 
 ceedings on the matter are suspended until their 
 report is received. 
 
 The practice in the Senate with reference to 
 any of their bills which may have been returned 
 from the Commons with amendments, differs 
 somewhat from that of the Commons in this re- 
 spect, — ^leaving it optional to refer the amend- 
 ments to the select committee, or to 'i committee 
 of the whole* 
 
 If the House disaj;free to one or more of the 
 amendments, a committee is appointed to draw 
 up the reasons for disagreeing, and they are com- 
 municated to the Senate at a conference,! and 
 an opportunity is thus afforded to the Senate of 
 not insisting upon the amendments objected to; 
 or the reasons may be set forth in the motion for 
 disagreeing, and communicated by message .J In 
 the event of both Houses refusing to yield the 
 point in discussion, the bill is withdrawn or aban- 
 doned. § 
 
 In case a bill should not be proceeded with in 
 the Senate, in consequence of amendments having 
 been made which infringe the privileges of the 
 Lower House, the same proceedings are adopted 
 
 DilU 
 by Coiu- 
 
 Amo'id- 
 mentd Ai9- 
 agrood to. 
 
 Bills not 
 proceeded 
 with in 
 Senate. 
 
 way, 1864 ; 
 ; Beavertoa 
 
 * 69tli Rule, Senate, 
 
 t Levis incorporation, 1861. 
 
 X Quebec Corporation, 18GG. 
 
 § Sherwood, p. 74. 
 
112 
 
 THIRD RE fVDINO OF BILL, 
 
 as in case of a public bill. A committee is ap- 
 Committee pointed to scarch f xC Journals of the Senate, and 
 
 to search -•• 
 
 Journals, on their report, another bill may be ordered, in- 
 cluding the amendments made by the Senate.* 
 
 May, p. 733. 
 
 #1 
 
113 
 
 14.— PROCEEDINGS ON PRIVATE BILLS 
 IN THE SENATE. 
 
 The proceedings on private tills in the Upper 
 House differed materially from those in the Lower 
 House, until the year 1861 ; but in that year the Procecd- 
 
 ings nearly 
 
 Legislative Council adopted Private Bill Rules identical 
 identical with those of the Legislative Assembly, of com- 
 Some changes were made in these Rules by the °^^^^' 
 House of Commons, in the first Session after Con- 
 federation, — the most imj^ortant of which consist- ^*^®p''°°' 
 ed in the reference of bills after the^rs^ instead of 
 the second reading (hereinbefore referred to) : this 
 change, and certain minor alterations contmgent 
 upon it, were not adojited by the Senate, and bills 
 before that House are therefore referred, as here- 
 tofore, after the second reading. In other respects 
 the proceedings of the two Houses may be said 
 to be identical.* AVhcn any such bill has been 
 
 * The House of Lords have ceitain Stauding Orders which 
 are not common to both Houses. By one called the " Wharn- 
 cliffe Order," it is provided that no bill empowering an existing 
 company to execute or contribute to works, other than those for 
 which it was origiaally constituted, or for the amalgamation, 
 
114 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN 
 
 ii 
 
 r 
 
 Evidence, referred to a select or standing committee, the 
 same course is taken for obtaining evidence upon 
 the preamble ; or the committee can, if they de- 
 sire it, instruct their chairman to move that a 
 messag3 be sent to the Commons, requesting that 
 the proofs and evidence on which tjie bill is 
 founded may be communicated,* and these, 
 when received, are referred to the committee. 
 
 BitVng of 111 ^^Q case of bills upon which notice by adver- 
 
 committeo. tisement is required by the Rules, the committee 
 give twenty-four hours' notice of their sitting.f 
 By far the greater number of private bills are 
 
 P"^*r1"„ introduced first in the Commons, but no arranffe- 
 
 tion of bills ' ® 
 
 in either mcut has yet been effected between the two 
 
 Uouse. 
 
 Houses, similar to that in operriion in the Imperial 
 Parliament, for regulating the class of bills which 
 should originate in each House. A reference to 
 
 dissolution, or abandonment of the company, will be allowed to 
 proceed without proof that a meeting of the proprietors was 'ield, 
 at which the bill was approved. There are also (under other of 
 their Standing Orders) special matters required to be proved, or 
 to be done, in certain classes of bills ; and it is especially pro- 
 vided that no bill for the regulation of any trade, or the exten- 
 sion of the term of a patent, is to be read a second time, until a 
 select committee has reported upon the expediency of taking it 
 into further consideration. May, pp. 738 to 740. 
 
 * Pickering Harbour and Road Bill 1852-3 ; Bill to remedy 
 defects in title to Lot 4, Broken concession A and B, township 
 of Hamilton, 1854-5. 
 
 t 60th Rule, Senate. 
 
ee, the 
 le upon 
 hey de- 
 j that a 
 ing that 
 
 bill is 
 L these, 
 imittee. 
 T adver- 
 nmittee 
 ting.f 
 3ills are 
 irrange- 
 he two 
 mperial 
 
 which 
 jiice to 
 
 ill owed to 
 was 'icld, 
 r other of 
 roved, or 
 nally pro- 
 he exten- 
 le. until a 
 taking it 
 
 remedy 
 township 
 
 THE SENATE. 
 
 115 
 
 the remarks on this subject in the rreiiminary 
 Chapter, and the corresponding Note, will ex- 
 plain the nature of this arrangement, {supra, p. 5.) 
 
 Divorce Bills are introduced first in the Senate, Divorcb 
 and there are certain Standini? Orders concerninc: ^^^^ ' 
 them which are peculiar to that House. On the 
 presentation of the jietition, a sum of $100 is de- Fee. 
 posited in the hands of the Clerk,* in place of 
 the fee levied upon other private bills after the 
 second reading. Notice of the application must 
 be published in the Official Gazette, and in two Notice, 
 other newspapers, during six months before the 
 presentation, instead of two months,! and various 
 matters must be proved on the reading of the 
 petition, which are specified in detail in the Chap- 
 ter headed " Proof of Notices," &c. [supra, p. 38.) 
 The bill, when presented, cannot be read a First and 
 
 second 
 
 second time until 14 days shall h?ve elapsed from reading of 
 the first reading : a notice of the day ai)pointed ^ ^ 
 therefor, with a copy of the bill, are served on the 
 party from whom the divorce is sought ; and. 
 proof, on oath, of such service (where the same is 
 possible) is adduced at the Bar before the second 
 reading.^ The petitioner attends below the Attend- 
 Bar, at the second reading, to be examined gene- petitioner, 
 rally, or as to any collusion between the parties 
 
 * 84th Rule, Senate. 
 t 73rd Rule, Senate. 
 % 77th Rule, Senate. 
 
I 
 
 116 
 
 Examina- 
 tion of 
 witnesses. 
 
 Counsel. 
 
 Summons 
 for wit- 
 nesses. 
 
 Bill re- 
 ferred to 
 committee 
 of whole. 
 
 Prohibit- 
 ory clause. 
 
 proce:edings in 
 
 to obtain a separation, unless such attendance is 
 dispensed with.* After the second readiiio-, 
 witnesses are examined at the Bar, on oath, in 
 support of the bill, the preliminary evidence being- 
 that (by certificate or otherwise) of the due cele- 
 bration of the marriage of the parties.f The 
 counsel for each party may be heard at the Bar, 
 either on the evidence, or on the provision for 
 the future support of the wife.| AVitnesses are 
 notified by a svimmons under the hand and seal 
 of the Speaker, served at the expense of the party 
 applying therefor, by whom also their expenses 
 are defrayed. § Any witness refusing to attend 
 is taken into the custody of the Usher of the Black 
 Rod, and is liable for all expenses attending such 
 default. II After the second reading, the bill is 
 referred, not to a select or standing committee, 
 but to a committee of the whole House. ^ No 
 bill to dissolve a marriage on the ground of adul- 
 tery is received, without a clause prohibiting tho 
 offending party from marrying ; but this clause 
 is struck out in committee, or on the report, ex 
 cept in very peculiar cases.** In all subsequent 
 
 * 78th Rule, Senate. 
 
 t YOthRule, Senate. 
 
 t 80 th Rule, Senate. 
 
 § 81st Rule, Senate. 
 
 II 82nd Rule, Senate. 
 
 ir May, p. 151. 
 
 *-* May (Edit, of 1855), p. 811. 
 
THE SENATE. 
 
 117 
 
 iidaiice is 
 readiiis'. 
 11 oath, in 
 nee being- 
 due cele- 
 is.f The 
 it the Bar, 
 vision for 
 lesses are 
 1 and seal 
 ■ the party 
 expenses 
 to attend 
 ^ the Black 
 ding such 
 the bill is 
 ommittee, 
 ise. t No 
 id of adul- 
 .biting the 
 his clause 
 report, ex- 
 absequent 
 
 proceedings, divorce bills arc dealt with in the 
 same manner as other private bills. If any mat- Unprovi- 
 ter not provided for by the Rules should arise, 
 reference is had to the Rules and practice of the 
 House of Lords.* "When the bill is reported, 
 and any amendments that may have been made 
 are disposed of by the House, it is ordered to be 
 read a third time on a future day, when it is 
 read a third time, passed, and sent to the Com- 
 mons in the usual form. 
 
 Bills for the reversal of attainders, or for there- Reversal of 
 storation of honors and lands, are first signed by 4c!^'° *"' 
 the Governor General, and are presented in the 
 Senate (without a previous petition) by command 
 of His Excellency ; f after which they pass 
 through the ordinary stages, and are sent to the 
 Commons. Here the Queen's consent is signified 
 before the first reading ; and if this form be over- 
 looked, the proceedings will be null and void. 
 After the second reading,^ thoy may be ordered 
 to be read a third time on a subsequent day, with- 
 out reference to a committee. Such bills receive 
 
 * 85th Rule, Senate. 
 
 t Matthews' attainder reversal ; Council Journ.,1816, p. 147. 
 
 t In the British House of Commons, such bills, after the 
 second reading, are committed to several members specially 
 nominated, " and all the members of this House who are of Her 
 Majesty's most honorable Privy Council, and all the gentlemen 
 of the long robe." May, p. 750. 
 
 
'"^" I. ■,-,i,lill,J!ll!)JHliPipip 
 
 i-'-rtl * rr^-^ir'* 
 
 118 
 
 PROCEEDINGS IN THE SENATE. 
 
 t 
 
 Senate. 
 
 the Royal Assent in the usual form, as public 
 
 bills* 
 
 The bills sent down to the Commons pass 
 in'gsln'^' through the same stages, and are subject to the 
 Commons game rules, as other private bills, except that 
 
 on bills ' ^ ' ^ ^ 
 
 from divorce bills are referred to a selected instead of 
 a standing committee. When any private bill 
 (not being a divorce bill)! is so received, that is 
 not based on a petition which has been already 
 reported on by the Committee on Standing Or- 
 ders, it is taken into consideration and reported 
 on by the said committee, after the first reading,! 
 "with reference to the notices required by the 
 Rules. 
 
 * May, p. 751. 
 t May, p. 757. 
 1 54th Rule. 
 
as public 
 
 119 
 
 ions pass 
 3ct to th-j 
 3ept that 
 iistead of 
 Lvate bill 
 d, that is 
 11 already 
 tiding Or- 
 [ reported 
 reading,! 
 ed by the 
 
 Publio 
 
 Act" 
 
 dauae. 
 
 15— ROYAL AS8ENT. 
 
 Private bills receive the Royal Assent in the 
 same manner and form, and at the same time, as 
 public bills. Heretofore, every private Act, al- 
 most without exception, contained a clause de- 
 claring that it " shall be deemed a i^ublic Act." 
 The effect of this clause was that it should be 
 construed as an enactment that such Act should 
 be judicially noticed by all Judges, Justices of 
 the Peace and others, without being specially 
 pleaded ; whereas j^rivate Acts which did not 
 contain such a clause could be judicially noticed 
 only when specially pleaded. But by the " In- ah Acta 
 terpretation Act" x>assed in 1867, it is expressly ed to be 
 provided that " every Act shall, unless by express Acta, 
 provision it is declared to be a Private Act, be 
 deemed to be a Pubhc Act, and shall be judicially 
 noticed by all Judges, Justices of the Peace, and 
 others, without being specially pleaded ; and all 
 copies of Acts printed by the Queen's Printer, 
 shall be evidence of such Acts and of their con- 
 tents."* 
 
 * 31 Vic, cap. 1, sec. 7., sub-sec. 38. 
 
120 
 
 ROYAL ASSENT. 
 
 with tho 
 ■Statutes. 
 
 I ! 
 
 Until the year 1849, private Acts were printed 
 ^'r/vatoacfs ^^'^^^^ ^^^^ pubUc statutes, aud bound together in 
 the same volume. In that year, an Act was 
 I^assed" which provided that local Acts should 
 be printed (at the expense of the Province) in 
 such number only as should suffice for distribu- 
 tion to the Judges, Public Departments, and ce: 
 tain local functionaries ; and that of private or 
 personal Acts, 150 copies only should be printed, 
 at the expense of the parties obtaining the same. 
 Under this arrangement no private Acts of any 
 class were printed for general distribution with 
 the Statutes ; and the inconvenience attending it 
 was so strongly felt, that in 1851 an Act was 
 passed t i^roviding for the printing and distri- 
 bution of all local, x:>rivate, and personal Acts, in 
 the same manner, and to the same extent as the 
 public Acts, — reviving, in fact, the former prac- 
 tice of binding up all the Acts of a Session, pub- 
 lic and private, in the same volume. But by the 
 "Interpretation Act" of 1867, it is provided that 
 the Governor in Council may direct the distribu- 
 tion of the Statutes in such manner, either by the 
 binding of the Public G-eneral Acts, and Acts of a 
 local or private character, in separate volumes, or 
 by binding them together in the same volumes 
 
 * 12 Vic. cap. 16. 
 
 t 14, 15 Vic, cap. 81. 
 
ROYAL A8SENT. 
 
 121 
 
 i printed 
 Tether in 
 Act was 
 s should 
 riiice) in 
 distrilm- 
 , and ce: 
 )rivate or 
 } printed, 
 the same. 
 ts of any 
 ;ion with 
 ;ending it 
 L Act was 
 id distri- 
 1 Acts, in 
 ent as the 
 mcr prac- 
 sion, pub- 
 Jut by the 
 rided that 
 
 distribu- 
 ler by the 
 
 Acts of a 
 )lumes, or 
 
 volumes 
 
 with separate indexes or otherwise, as may be 
 deemed expedient.* It may be worthy of con- 
 sideration whether the public convenience would 
 not be sufficiently consulted by printing a limited 
 number (say 500 copies) of the local and private 
 Acts, binding them in a supplementary volume, 
 and distributing them with the public Acts only 
 where they are really required.! This w^ould 
 cause a large saving in the cost of printing, and 
 would disencumber the Statute Book of a mass 
 of enactments which have no bearing on the 
 statute law of the land. 
 
 * 31 Vic, cap. 1, sec. 13. 
 
 t All such private Acts of tlie Imperial Parliament as con- 
 tain the ''public" clause are printed in a separate collection, 
 and are known as local or personal Acts. Another class, con- 
 sisting chiefly of inclosure, drainage, and estate Acts, are printed 
 by the Queen's Printers, and contain a clause declaring that a 
 copy so printed "shall be admitted as evidence thereof by all 
 judges, justices and others," and a further enactment that the 
 "Act shall not be deemed a public Act." A third class, con- 
 sisting of name, naturalization, divorce, and othar strictly per- 
 sonal Acts, are not printed ; but a list of them is inserted by the 
 Queen's Printers after the titles of the other private Acts. May, 
 pp. 759, 760. 
 
 11 
 
122 
 
 APPENDIX I. 
 
 RULES COMMON TO BOTH HOUSES 
 
 IN RELATION TO 
 
 rPvIYATE BILLS. 
 
 40. No retition for any Private Bill is received 
 
 Petition 8 
 
 for Privuto by The House [Senate] after the first three weeks 
 of each ^Session ; nor may any Private Bill be pre- 
 sented to The House [Senate] after the first four 
 weeks of each Session ; nor may any Report of 
 any Standing or Select Committee upon a Private 
 Bill be received after the first six weeks of each 
 Session. [And no Motion for the general suspen- 
 sion or modification of this Rule shall be enter- 
 tained by The House, unless after reference made 
 thereof at a previous sitting of The House, to the 
 several Standing Committees charged with con- 
 sideration of Private Bills, or upon Report sub- 
 mitted by two or more of such Committees.]* 
 
 * This sentence occurs in the Commons Rule only. 
 
RULES RELATIVE TO PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 128 
 
 USES 
 
 received 
 ^e weeks 
 1 be pre- 
 irst four 
 eport of 
 , Private 
 ; of each 
 suspen- 
 36 enter- 
 ic e made 
 se, to the 
 rith con- 
 tort sub- 
 ?es.]* 
 
 60. The Clerk of The House [Senat?] shall, dur- P'»»>»o*\ 
 ing each Recess of Parliament, publish weekly cierk, of 
 in the Official Gazette, the following Rules re- tire to Nc- 
 specting Notices of intended appHcations for Pri- '*' 
 vate Bills, and in other newspapers (English and 
 French) the substance thereof; and shall also, im- 
 mediately after the issue of the Proclamation con- 
 vening Parliament for the despatch of business, 
 publish in the Official G-azetce, and in other 
 newspapers, as aforesaid, until the opening of 
 Parliament, the day on which the time limited 
 for receiving Petitions for Private Bills will ex- 
 pire, pursuant to the foregoing Rule ; and the 
 Clerk shall also announce, by notice affixed in the 
 committee rooms and lobbies of this House [the 
 Senate] by the first day of every Session, the time 
 limited for receiving Petitions for Private Bills, 
 and Private Bills, and Reports thereon. 
 
 51. All applications for Private Bills, x^roperly Notices for 
 the subjects of legislation by the Parliament of Bills. 
 Canada within the purview of. " The British 
 North America Act, 1867," whether for the erec- 
 tion of a Bridge, the making of a Railroad, Turn- 
 pike Road, or Telegraph Line ; the construction 
 or improvement *"'' a Harbour, Canal, Lock, Dam 
 or Slide, or othe. like work ; the granting of a 
 right of Ferry ; the incorporation of any particular 
 Trade or Calling, or of any Banking or other Joint 
 Stock Company ; or otherwise for granting to any 
 
124 
 
 RULES RELATIVE TO 
 
 •Ilii 
 
 till i 
 
 In ■ 
 
 individual or individuals any exclusive or pecu- 
 liar rights or privileges whatever, or foi doing any 
 matter or thing which in its operation would 
 affect the rights or property of other parties, or 
 relate to any particular class of the community ; 
 or for making any amendment of a like nature to 
 any former Act, — shall require a Notice, clearly 
 and distmctly specifying the nature and object 
 of the application, to be published as follows, 
 viz.: — 
 
 In the Province of Quebec — A Notice inserted in 
 Notices for ih^ Official Gazette, in the English and French 
 BUh^ ^ languages, and in one newspaper in the English, 
 and one newspaper in the French language, in 
 the District affected, or in both languages if 
 there be but one paper ; or if there be no paper 
 published therein, then (in both languages) in 
 the Official G-azette, and in a paper published in 
 an adjoining District. 
 
 In any other Province — A Notice inserted in the 
 Official Gazette, and in one newspaper published 
 in the County, or Union of Counties, affected, or 
 if there be no paper published therein, then in a 
 newspaper in the next nearest County in which 
 a newspaper is published. 
 
 Such Notices shall be continued in each case 
 for a period of at least two months, during the in- 
 terval of time between the close of the next pre- 
 
PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 125 
 
 c*r pecu- 
 )iiig any 
 L would 
 rties, or 
 nunity ; 
 ature to 
 clearly 
 I object 
 follows, 
 
 erted in 
 French 
 English, 
 lage, in 
 lages if 
 .0 paper 
 ges) in 
 Lshed in 
 
 d in the 
 ibHshed 
 cted, or 
 \en in a 
 1 which 
 
 tch case 
 I the in- 
 ext pre- 
 
 ceding Session and the consideration of the Peti- 
 tion. 
 
 52. Before any Petition pravinj? for leave to TollBridge 
 
 •' 1 ' Bills. 
 
 bring in a Private Bill for the erection of a Toll- 
 bridge, is present <^d to the House [Senate], the 
 person or persons intending to petition foi such 
 Bill, shall, upon giving the Notice jirescribed 
 by the preceding Rule, also, at the same tinie, and 
 in the same manner, give Notice of the Rates 
 wh'.jh they intend to ask, the extent of the 
 privilege, the height of the arches, the interval 
 between the abutments or piers for the passage of 
 rafts and vessels, and mentioning also whether 
 they intend to erect a drawbridge or not, and 
 the dimensions of the same. 
 
 53. Petitions for Private Bills, when received Petitions 
 by The House [Senate], are to be taken into con- p^orteroa 
 sideration (without special reference) by the Com- l^ng'^'o'rdera 
 mittee on Standing Orders ; which is to report in Committee 
 each case, whether the Rules with regard to No- 
 tice have been complied with ; and in every case 
 where the Notice shall. prove to have been insuffi- 
 cient, either as regards the Petition as a whole, or 
 
 any matter therein which ought to have been 
 specially referred to in the Notice, the Committee 
 is to recommend to The House [Senate] the course 
 to be taken in consequence of such insufficiency 
 of Notice. 
 
 r * 
 
 0-*. 
 
 All Private Bills from, the Senate [House of 
 
■^^pppii 
 
 I ■ ' 
 
 126 
 
 Private 
 Bills from 
 Senate. 
 
 SuspoDsion 
 of Rules. 
 
 Introduc- 
 tion of 
 Private 
 Bills. 
 
 Letters 
 Patent, or 
 Agree- 
 ments. 
 
 Fees, and 
 cost of pre- 
 paring and 
 printing 
 Private 
 Bills. 
 
 RULES RELATIVE TC 
 
 Commons], (not being based on a Petition which 
 has already been so reported on by the Committee) 
 shall be first taken into consideration and report- 
 ed on by the said Committee in like manner, after 
 the First Reading of such Bills, and before their 
 consideration by any other Standing Committee. 
 
 55. No Motion for the suspension of the Eules 
 upon any Petition for a Private Bill is entertained, 
 unless the same has been reported upon by the 
 Committee on Standing Orders. 
 
 56. All Private Bills are introduced on Petition, 
 and presented to The E J [Senate], [upon a 
 motion for leave, to be made on a Monday, Wed- 
 nesday, or Friday, immediately before the calling 
 of the Orders for Private Bills, — and * ] after such 
 Petition has been favorably reported on by the 
 Committee on Standing Orders. 
 
 57. "When any Bill for coniinning any Letters 
 Patent or Agreement is presented to The House, 
 [Senate] a true copy of such Letters Patent or 
 Agreement must be attached to it. 
 
 58. The expenses and costs attend' ii Private 
 Bills giving any exclusive privilege, ' for any 
 object of profit, or private or corporate or indi- 
 vidual advantage; or for amending, extending, 
 or enlarging any former Acts, in such manner as 
 to confer additional powers, ought not to fall on 
 
 * These words occur in the Commons Rule only. 
 
tion which 
 'ommittee) 
 md report- 
 nner, after 
 ?fore their 
 Dmmittee. 
 the Hules 
 itertained, 
 >on by the 
 
 11 Petition, 
 e], [upon a 
 day, Wed- 
 ;he caUing 
 after such 
 on by the 
 
 ny Letters 
 he House, 
 Patent or 
 
 ui Private 
 ' lor any 
 e or indi- 
 ixtending, 
 nanner as 
 to fall on 
 
 PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 127 
 
 the public ; accordingly the parties seeking to Foes and 
 obtain any such Bill, shall be required to pay into '^^^''s®^- 
 the Private Bill Office the sum of one hundred 
 dollars, immediately after the [First Reading * ] 
 thereof: and all such bills shall be prepared in the 
 English and French languages, by the parties ap- 
 plying for ^he same, and i^rinted by the Contrac- 
 tor for printing the Bills of The House [Senate], 
 and 500 copies thereof in English and 200 copies 
 in French shaU be deposited in the Private Bill 
 Office [and distribution thereof made, before the 
 First Reading! ] ; and no such Bill shall be read 
 a Third time until a certificate from the Queen's 
 Printer shall have been fyled with The Clerk, 
 ;hat the cost of printing 500 copies of the Act in 
 ^nghsh and 250 in French, for the G-overnment, 
 las been paid to him. 
 
 The Fee payable on the [First Reading * ] of Fee, and 
 my Private Bill is paid only in the House in which printing, 
 inch Bill originates, but the cost of printing the ''^"^ p*^**' 
 ame is paid in each House. 
 
 59. Every Private Bill, when read a [First time Bills and 
 :] is referred to the Committee on Private Bills, referred.^ 
 f any such shall haA'e been appointed, or to some 
 )ther Standing Committee of the same character ; 
 
 * ^^ Second reading," in Senate Rule. 
 
 t In the Senate Rale, the words '' before second reading," 
 ccur in place of those between brackets. 
 t '< Second iime,^^ in Senate Rule. 
 
128 
 
 KULES RELATIVE TO 
 
 and all Petitions before The House [Senate] for oi 
 against the Bill are considered as referred to such 
 
 Committee 
 
 Committee. 
 
 Commons. 
 
 60. No Committee o]i any Pri- 
 o}!!^^.*!L ^^^^G BiP., originating in this House, 
 of which Notice is required to be 
 given, is to consider the same un- 
 til after ten clear days' Notice of 
 the Sitting of such Committee has 
 been first affixed in the Lobby; nor, 
 in the case of any such Bill origina- 
 ting in the Senate, until after two 
 days' like Notice. And no Motion 
 for any general suspension or mod- 
 ification of thisEule, shall be enter- 
 tained by theHouse, unless after re- 
 ference made thereof at a previous 
 sitting of The House, to the sever- 
 al Standing Committees charo-ed 
 with consideration of Private Bills, 
 or ui^on Eeport submitted by two 
 or more of such Committees. 
 
 2. On the day of the posting of 
 
 in the case of 
 any such Bill 
 
 any Bill underthis Rule, the ChiefiiT,^ t ^kk,^ . „^^ 
 Clerk of the Private Bill Office, ^^® ^^^^^ ' '''*'' 
 shall append to the printed Votes 
 and Proceedings of the day, a No- 
 tice of such posting : and he shall 
 also append to the .Votes of each 
 day, a Notice of the meetings of 
 any of the Standing Committees 
 charged with the consideration of til after twenty- 
 Private Bills or Petitions therefor, ^^j. j.^^^^, ^^^ 
 that may have been appomted lor 
 the following day. notice. 
 
 61. A copy of the Bill containing the Amend- 
 
 Senate. 
 
 60. No Com- 
 mittee on am 
 Private Bill ori 
 ginating m th* 
 Senate,ofwhicli 
 Notice is re 
 quired to be 
 given, is to con- 
 sider the same 
 until after a 
 week's notice 
 of the Sitting 
 of such Com- 
 mittee, has been 
 first affixed iu 
 
 originating 
 the House 
 Commons, 
 
 111 
 
 of 
 
 ail 
 
 ^111 
 
 men 
 
 Con 
 
 Offic 
 
 Con 
 
 62 
 
 be a 
 
 quir 
 
 mitt( 
 
 cons 
 
 mail' 
 
 the( 
 
 Com 
 
 who; 
 
 Com 
 
 offeci 
 
 ed to 
 
 63. 
 
 Bills 
 
 ing t 
 
 the Y 
 
 or ca 
 
 64. 
 
 whic! 
 
 Hous 
 
 [Sena 
 
 Bill 1 
 
 plate< 
 
 byth 
 
 65. 
 
PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 129 
 
 Late] for oi 
 ed to such 
 
 ENATE. 
 
 No Com- 
 e on ain 
 ite Bill ori 
 ing ill th^ 
 [e,ofwliicl 
 ie is re- 
 el to be 
 1, is to con- 
 
 the sanK 
 after a 
 :'s notice 
 le Sitting 
 uch Com 
 e, has been 
 affixed iu 
 obby ; nor, 
 le case of 
 
 such Bill 
 rating in 
 House of 
 nons, an- 
 
 er twenty- 
 hours' like 
 e. 
 
 le Amend- 
 
 ments proposed to be submitted to the Standing 
 Committee, shall be deposited in the Private Bill 
 Office, one clear day before the meeting of the 
 Committee thereupon. 
 
 62. All persons whose interest or i^roperty may 
 be affected by any Private Bill, shall, when re- 
 quired so to do, appear before the Standing Com- 
 mittee touching their consent, or may send such 
 consent in writing, proof of which may be de- 
 manded by such Committee. And in every case, 
 the Committee upon any Bill for incorporating a 
 Company, may require proof that the persons 
 whose names appear in the Bill as composing the 
 Company, are of full age, and in a i)osition to 
 effect the objects contemplated, and have consent- 
 ed to become incorx^orated. 
 
 63. All questions before Committees on Private 
 Bills are decided by a majority of voices, includ- 
 ing the voice of the Chairman ; and whenever 
 the voices are equal, the Chairman has a second 
 or casting ^'ote. 
 
 6-4. It is the duty of the Select Committee to 
 which any Private Bill may be referred by The 
 House [Senate], to call the attention of The House 
 [Senate] specially to any provisioii inserted in such 
 Bill that does not appear to have been contem- 
 plated in the Notice for the same, as reported upon 
 by the Committee on Standing Orders. 
 
 65. The Committee to which a Private Bill 
 
 Deposit of 
 filled up 
 Bill in Pri- 
 vate Bill 
 Ofilce. 
 
 Conaent of 
 parties in- 
 terested. 
 
 Voting in 
 committecB 
 
 Extraordi- 
 nary pro- 
 visions in 
 Bills. 
 
130 
 
 RULES RELATIVE TO 
 
 i I 
 
 m 
 
 Report of may have been referred, shall report the same to 
 
 CommUtee. ■' 
 
 The House [Senate], in every case ; and when a;iy 
 material alteration has been made in the Preamble 
 of the Bill, such alteration, and the reasons for the 
 same, are to be stated in the Report. 
 
 Preambi ^^' ^^^^^^ ^^® Committee on any Private Bill 
 notrroved. report to The House [Senate] that the Pre ■ nble 
 of such Bill has not been proved to their satisfac- 
 tion, they must also state the grounds upon which 
 they have arrived at such a decision ; and no Bill 
 so reported upon shall be x:)laced upon the Orders 
 of the Day unless by special order of The House 
 [Senate]. 
 
 [2. Private Bills otherwise reported to The 
 House by such Committee, shall be j)laced upon 
 the Orders of the Day following the reception of 
 the Report, for a second reading, in the proper 
 order, next after Bills referred to a Committee ol 
 the Whole House.* ] 
 
 67. The Chairman of the Committee shall sign 
 with his name at length, a printed copy of the 
 Bill, on which the Amendments are fairly written, 
 and shall also sign with the initials of his name 
 the several Amendments made and Clauses added 
 in Committee ; and another copy of the Bill, with 
 the amendments written thereon, shall be pre 
 pared by the Clerk of the Committee, and fyled 
 
 Chairman 
 to sign 
 Bills and 
 Amend- 
 ments. 
 
 I I 
 
 * This paragraph occurs in the Commons Rule only. 
 
; the same to 
 id when apy 
 le Preamble 
 asons for the 
 
 Private Bill 
 .e Pre.- nble 
 heir satisfac- 
 upon which 
 ; and no Bill 
 11 the Orders 
 The House 
 
 ted to The 
 placed upon 
 recejition ol 
 . the propel 
 Committee ol 
 
 ,ee shall sign 
 copy of the 
 lirly written 
 of his name 
 lauses added 
 he Bill, with 
 hall be pre- 
 e, and fyled 
 
 i only. 
 
 PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 in the Private BiV. Office, ^r attached to the Re- 
 port. 
 
 68. No important Amendment may be i^roposed 
 to any Private Bill, in a Committee of the "Whole 
 House, or at the Third Heading of the Bill, unless 
 one day's notice of the same shall have been given. 
 
 69. When any Private Bill is returned from the 
 ^Senate [House of Commons] with amendments, 
 the same not being merel) verbal or unimportant, 
 such amendments are, i)revious to the Second 
 Reading, referred to [a Committee ol the Whole, 
 or to * I the Standing Committee to which such 
 Bill was originally referred. 
 
 70. Except in cases of urgent and pressing ne- 
 cessity, no Motion may be made to dispense with 
 any Standing Order relative to Private Bills, with- 
 out due notice thereof 
 
 71. A Book, to be called the '• Private Bill Re- 
 gister," shall be kept in a room to be called the 
 " Private Bill Office," in which Book shall be en- 
 tered, by the Clerk api)ointed for the business of 
 that Office, the name, description, and place of 
 residence of the parties applying for the Bill, or 
 of their agent, and all the j)roceedings thereon, 
 from the Petition to the passing of the Bill ; such 
 entry to specify briefly each proceeding in The 
 House [Senate], or in any Committee to which 
 
 * These words occur in the Senate Rule only. 
 
 131 
 
 Amend- 
 ments by 
 the House. 
 
 Bill 
 
 amendoJ 
 by Senate, 
 
 Dispensing 
 withstand- 
 ing Orders. 
 
 Private 
 Bill Regia- 
 ter. 
 
132 
 
 RULES RELATIVE TO 
 
 '^Kj' 
 
 liili 
 
 1 
 
 ! I 
 
 ! 
 
 Private 
 £111 Com- 
 mittees. 
 
 Unprovid- 
 ed ca?es, 
 Senate. 
 
 Parlia- 
 mentary 
 Agents. 
 
 the Bill or Petition may be referred, and the day 
 on which the Committee ifi appointed to sit. Such 
 book to be open to i)ublic insi)ection daily, during 
 Office hours. 
 
 72. The [Chief* ] Clerk of the Private Bill 
 Office shall i:)ropare, daily, lists of all Private Bills, 
 and Petitions for such Bills, upon which any Com- 
 mittee is appointed to sit, specifying the time of 
 meeting and the room where the Committee 
 shall sit ; and the same shall be hung up in the 
 Lobby. 
 
 (The following Rules may also be given, as 
 bearing on the practice in Parliament in relation 
 to Private as well as Public Bills.) 
 
 (Senate.) 
 
 113. — In all unprovided cases,the rules, usages, 
 and forms of the House of Lords are to be fol- 
 lowed. 
 
 {Commons.) 
 
 73. — Every Parliamentary Agent conducting 
 proceedings before the House of Commons, shall 
 be personally resx)onsible to the House and to 
 the Speaker for the observance of the rules, 
 orders and practice of Parliament, and rules pre- 
 scribed by the Speaker, and also for the payment 
 of all fees and charges ; and he shall not act as a 
 
 * In Commons Rule only. 
 
PRIVATE BILLS. 
 
 133 
 
 id the day 
 3 sit. Such 1 
 ily, during 
 
 rivate Bill 
 ivate Bills, 
 1 any Com- 
 the time of 
 Committee 
 »• uj) in the 
 
 i given, as 
 in relation 
 
 Parliamentary Agent until he shall have received 
 the exi:>ress sanction and authority of the Speaker. 
 74. — Any A<?ent who shall wilfully act in vio- Agents 
 
 ■' ° •' . violating 
 
 lation of the rules and practice of Parliament, or Rules Ha- 
 of any rules to be prescribed by the Speaker, or pension. 
 who shall wilfully misconduct himself in prose- 
 cuting any proceedings before Parliament, shall 
 be liable to an absolute or temporary i^rohibition 
 to practise as a Parliamentar}^ Agent, at the 
 pleasure of the Speaker ; provided that upon the 
 application of such Agent, the Speaker shall state 
 in writing the ground for such prohibition. 
 
 116. — In all unprovided cases, the rules, usages Unprovid- 
 
 fid CILSfiS 
 
 and forms of the House of Commons of the United Commona. 
 Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland shall be 
 followed. 
 
 des, usages, 
 e to be fol- 
 
 conducting 
 mons, shall 
 use and to 
 
 the rules, 
 1 rules pre- 
 le payment 
 
 lot act as 'a 
 
 I 
 
 12 
 
134 
 
 APPENDIX II. 
 
 m\ 
 
 J ! 
 
 RULES OF THE SENATE 
 
 COXCERNINO 
 
 BILLS OF DIVORCE. 
 
 73. Every Applicant for a Bill of Divorce is 
 notices'' required to give Notice of his intended api)lica- 
 pubhshed. ^[qj^^ ^nd to si")ecify from whom and for what 
 
 cause, by advertisement during six months, in 
 the Official Gazette, and in two newspapers pub- 
 lished in the District, in Quebec, or County or 
 Union of Counties in the other provinces, where 
 such Applicant usually resided at the time of the 
 separation, or if the requisite number of papers 
 cannot be found therein, then in the adjoining 
 District, or County or union of Counties. 
 
 The Notice for the Province of Quebec, is to 
 be published in the English and French lan- 
 guages. 
 
 74. A copy of the Notice, in writing, is to be 
 cd on ad- served, at the instance of the Applicant, upon 
 
 t: 
 
 ■'■^7'^- 
 
 '!i; ! 
 
DIVORCE BILLS. 
 
 135 
 
 , 
 
 oice IS 
 aj)i)lica- 
 )r what 
 iiths, in 
 ers pub- 
 amty or 
 3, where 
 le of the 
 f papers 
 djoining 
 
 ec, is to 
 ich Ian- 
 is to be 
 it, upon 
 
 the person from whom the Divorce is sought, if j^w^e par- 
 the residence of such person can be ascertained ; 
 and proof on Oath of such service, or of the 
 attempts made to effect it to the satisfaction of 
 The Senate, is to be adduced before The Senate 
 on the reading of the Petition. 
 
 75. When Proceedings in any Courts of Law Proceed- 
 have taken i^lace prior to the Petition, an exem- Courts 
 
 ill J 
 
 plification of such Proceedings to Imal judgment, 
 duly certified, is to be. presented to The Senate, 
 on the reading of the Petition. 
 
 76. In cases where damages have been award- pap^^gea 
 ed 10 the Apphcant, proof on Oath must be ad- 
 duced, to the satisfaction of The Senate, that such 
 damages have been levied and retained, or ex- 
 planation given to The Senate for the neglect or 
 inability to levy the same under a writ of execu- 
 tion, as they may deem a sufficient excuse for 
 
 such omission. 
 
 77. The Second Reading of the Bill is not to Formaii- 
 take place until fourteen days after the first 2nd read^ 
 reading, and Notice of such second reading is to ^°^' 
 
 be affixed upon the Doors of The Senate during 
 that period, and a copy thereof, and of the Bill, 
 duly served upon the party from whom the 
 Divorce is sought ; and proof, on Oath, of such 
 Service, adduced at the Bar of The Senate, before 
 proceeding to the second reading, or sufficient 
 
. IJINHMPIPII 
 
 13G 
 
 DIVORCE BILLS. 
 
 PetitioDor 
 to appear. 
 
 Eyiclenco 
 of celebre- 
 tion of 
 marriage. 
 
 'i 
 
 ii 
 
 T^^ 
 
 proof adduced of the impossibility ol complying- 
 with this regulation. 
 
 78. The petitioner is to appear below the B?r 
 of The Senate, at the second reading, to be 
 examined by the Senate, generally, or as to any 
 collusion or connivance between the parties to 
 obtain such separation, unless The Senate think 
 fit to dispense therewith. 
 
 79. After the Second Reading, Witnesses are to 
 be heard at the Bar of The Senate on Oath ; the 
 preliminary evidence being that of the due cele- 
 bration of the marriage between the parties, by 
 legitimate testimony, either by witnesses present 
 at the time of the ra' 'age, or by complete and 
 satisfactory proof of certificate of the officiat- 
 ing minister or authority. 
 
 80. The Counsel for the Applicant, as well as 
 the party from whom the Divorce is sought, may 
 be heard before the Bar of The Senate, as well on 
 the evidence adduced, as on the provisions for the 
 future support of the wife, if deemed necessary. 
 
 81. The "Witnesses are notified to attend by a 
 Witnesses, Summons, to issuc under the hand and seal of 
 moned. The Speaker, to the pai-ties appl^dng for the same, 
 
 on application to The Clerk of The Senate, and 
 served at the expense of the said parties, by the 
 Usher of the Black Eod, or his authorized Deputy ; 
 and every Witness is allowed his reasonable 
 
 Counsel 
 henfd. 
 
DIVORCE UILLH. 
 
 137 
 
 m plying- 
 
 the B.ir 
 ^, to be 
 s to any 
 oirties to 
 to think 
 
 les are to 
 ath ; the 
 hie cele- 
 irtios, by 
 5 present 
 )lete and 
 ofiiciat- 
 
 3 well as 
 ^ht, may 
 s well on 
 IS for the 
 jcessary. 
 and by a 
 d seal of 
 the same, 
 late, and 
 s, by the 
 Deputy ; 
 'asonable 
 
 expanses, to be taxed by The Sojiate, or any 
 Officer thereof appointed for that purpose. 
 
 82. "Witnesses refusinft- to obey the Summons ^'"^» ^''^ 
 
 ^ '' fusing to 
 
 are, by Order of the Senate, taken into the custody attend, 
 of the Usher of the Black Kod, and not liljerated 
 therefrom, except by Order of The Senate, and 
 after payment of the expenses incurred. 
 
 8o. Every Bill of Divorce is to be prepared in biu pro- 
 the Eui^Hsh and French languages by the party J^nfetriy 
 applying for the same, and printed by the Con- petitioner, 
 tractor for the Sessional Printing for The Senate, 
 at the expense of the party ; and five hundred 
 copies thereof, in English, and two hundred 
 copies in "Fix uch, must be deposited in the Office 
 of The Clerk of The Senate, and no such Bill is 
 to be read a third time until a certiiicate from the 
 Queen's Printer shall have been filed with The 
 Clerk, that the cost of printing 500 copies of the 
 Act in English, and 250 copies in French for the 
 Government, has been i>aid to him. 
 
 84. Every applicant for a Bill of Divorce, at Amcnnt to 
 the time of presenting the Petition, is to pay into ^® ^*'^* 
 the hands of The Clerk of The Senate, a sum o^ 
 
 One hundred dollars, to cover the exi^ense. 
 which may be incurred by the Senate during the 
 progress of the Bill. 
 
 85. In all improvided cases, reference should Unprovid- 
 be had to the Rules and Decisions of the House 
 
 of Lords. 
 
^tnoi 
 
 mm 
 
 138 
 
 APPENDIX III. 
 
 Jil 
 
 i 
 
 FORM OF PETITIOX TO THE THREE BRANCHES OF THE 
 LEGISLATURE, FOR A PRIVATE BILL. 
 
 PeJiTio'/toTo His Excellency the Right Honorable Sir 
 uncf^'^^' -^^^^ Young, Baronet, K.C.B., Cl.C.M.a., 
 Governor G-eneral of Canada, &c., &c., &c., 
 
 In Council. 
 
 The Petition of the undersigned 
 of 
 
 Humbly Sheweth: 
 
 of the 
 
 nil ! 
 
 That (here state the object de- 
 sired hy the petitioner in soliciting an Act). 
 
 Wherefore your petitioner humbly x>i'ays that 
 Your Excellency may be pleased to sanction 
 the passing of an Act (for the purposes above 
 mentioned). 
 
 And as in duty bound, your petitioner will ever 
 pray. 
 
 Seal, in the case 
 (Signature) \ of an existing 
 
 Corporation. 
 
 (Date.) 
 
YOUM OF PETITION. 
 
 139 
 
 ES OF THE 
 
 Table Sir 
 .1.C.M.G-, 
 
 &c., &c., 
 
 of the 
 
 object de- 
 
 ')■ 
 
 ►rays that 
 sanction 
 loses above 
 
 will ever 
 
 II the case 
 n existing 
 poration. 
 
 {To either House.) 
 
 To tne Honorable the ! ,, ^ „ _, 
 
 ( House oi Commons 
 
 of Canada, in Parliament assembled : 
 
 Form of 
 Petition to 
 Senate or 
 Houaa of 
 Commonfl, 
 
 The Petition of the undersigned 
 of 
 
 of the 
 
 Humbly Sheweth: 
 
 That {ho'e state the object de- 
 sired by th e petitioner in soliciting an Act) 
 
 "Wherefore your petitioner humbly jorays that 
 Your Honorable House may be pleased 
 to pass an Act (for the purposes above men- 
 tioned). 
 
 And as in duty bound, your i^etitioner will 
 ever pray. 
 
 (Signature) •{ Seal, as above. 
 
 Date.) 
 
Ala 
 
 Age 
 Af/r, 
 
 AUe 
 
 Ami 
 
 Ame 
 
141 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Abandonment q/ bill: 
 
 If a bill be abandoned by its promoters, the fact .is reported, or the com- 
 mittee may permit other parties to proceed with it, 94. 
 Affeuis .'—See Parliamentary Agents. 
 Agreements : 
 
 Copy thereof to be attached to any bill for confirming the same, 55, 126, 
 
 Aliens: — See Naturalizations. 
 
 Amalgamation of bills : 
 
 Provisions of several petitions included in a single bill, 56. 
 Provisions of several bills consolidated into one, 94. 
 
 Amendments : 
 
 Instru3tions to select committee on bill, concerning amendments, 65, 94.— 
 To committee of ■<vhole, 103. 
 
 Filled up copy of bill, containing any proposed amendments, to be deposited 
 by promoters before day for consideration of bill, 75, 128. 
 
 Petitions from promoters, for leave to amend their bill, 75. 
 
 Alterations in preamble to bo specially reported, 85, 130;— or material altera- 
 tions in bill, 90. 
 
 No new provisions (net covered by petition and notice) can be inserted by 
 committee without leave of the House, 85.— But an extension of the 
 operation of a bill may be recommended to the House, 92. 
 
 No new provisions may be inserted afi'ecting interests of parties not repre- 
 sented before committee, without due notice to such parties, 91. 
 
 No amendment irrelevant to the bill can be made in committee of whole 
 without an instruction, 104. 
 
 Notice must be given of or imnts proposed in committee of whole, 105, 
 131; — or after repo.i of committf"> of whole, 108;--or at third 
 reading, 109, 131. 
 
■^77?;f^i»tt" 
 
 11 
 
 142 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 ICanaZ . 
 Amendments — contipued. 
 
 No amendment oan be proposed to a clause, in committee of whole, after pasting 
 the committee has passed on to another clause, 106. 
 
 May be made by the House, after report of committee of whole, 108. 
 
 Amendments in excess of notice, should be referred tj Standing Orders Com 
 mittee, 108. 
 
 Verbal amendments only can bo made at third reading; but bill may be 
 re-commltted, 109. 
 
 Amendments of Senate to a bill originating in Common?,*are rcferrel ti 
 the committee of the Commons to which the bill was originally rt 
 ferred, 110, 131 — Practice in Senate with regard to amendments d 
 Commons, 111, 131. 
 
 Amendments of Senate disagreed to ; conference desired. 111 ; — or a mes- 
 sage may be sent to the Senate communicating the reasons for dis- 
 agreeing, ib. 
 
 Chi 
 
 {Heavin 
 
 Coi 
 
 Comm't 
 All 
 Tw 
 Coi 
 An 
 
 Attainders : 
 
 Bills for reversal of attainders, 117. 
 
 Banking : 
 
 Placed under control of the Parliament of Canada, 13. 
 Suggestion that all Bank bills should originate in the Common?, 5. 
 Standing committee on Banking and Commerce ,* appointment and power? 
 61. See Private Bill Committee. 
 
 Blanks : 
 
 Rates, tolls and fines are inserted in bill in italics, technically regarded as 
 
 blanks, 55. 
 Committee to fill up the blanks with the maximum rates, 87. 
 
 Bridges : 
 
 Notice of applications for toll-bridge bills, to specify rates of toll, Ac, ov, 
 
 123, 125. 
 Rates to be printed in the bill in italics, 55 ; — to be filled up by committed) 
 
 87. 
 Exceptional practice of originating rate^i of toll in committee of whole in 
 
 some instances, 87 ; — inexpediency of this course demonstrated, 88. 
 
 Business undisposed of : 
 
 Arrangement (in certain Sessions) for taking the same up at the nest 
 Session, 62. 
 
 !i! 
 
 las 
 No 
 No; 
 Coi 
 No 
 
 Ris 
 
 Rei 
 Pre 
 
 Am 
 
 On 
 On 
 
 Inc 
 
 Competi 
 Par 
 
 Con/ere) 
 On 
 
 Jonsent 
 Pro 
 Qu( 
 
hole, 108. 
 ling Orders Com- 
 bat bill may be 
 
 '^^ro rcferrel t 
 ras originally n 
 > amendments d 
 
 111 ; — or a mes 
 reasons for dij- 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 143 
 
 Jaiial BUl» : — Soo Railwayt ; Tolls. 
 
 Q of whole, after Siting Vote : 
 
 Chairman of any committee on private bills (and no other) has a second or 
 casting vote, 69, 129. 
 
 Cearinr/ of Room : 
 
 Committee room may be ckured for aiscussion, 79. 
 
 Committee o/ichole on private Itlla : 
 
 All bills, after second reading, referred to a committee of whole, 101. 
 Two or more bills may be considered together, 101. 
 Counsel heard (on one occasion) against a bill, at this stage, 99. 
 Amendmenti of select committee, not treated as amendments in committee 
 
 of whole, but bill considered as a whole, 103. 
 Instructions to committee, mandatory or permissive, 104, 
 No amendment irrelevant to the bill can be made without an instruction, 104. 
 Notice must bo given of amendments to be proposed in committee, 105, 131. 
 Course of proceeding in committee, 106. 
 No amendment can be proposed to » clause after committee has passed on 
 
 to another clause, 106. 
 Rise without reporting ; bill then regarded as defunct, bat may be revived, 
 
 107. 
 Report bill to the House, 107. 
 
 Proceedings in the House, after report, 108. — Bill may be re-committed, ib. 
 Amendments made in committee in excess of the notice, should be referred 
 
 to Standing Orders Committee, IDS. 
 
 Committees {Select) on private hills : 
 
 Oq ordinary bills, — See Private Bill Committee; Hailwaya. 
 On Divorce bills, 68. See Divorce Bills. 
 
 mon?, 5. 
 
 lent and power?. 
 
 illy regarded as 
 
 of toll, Ac, S9, 
 
 ttee of whole la 
 lODstrated, 88. 
 
 up at the nest 
 
 Companies /or transacting business throughout the Dominion : 
 Incorporation of, 18. 
 
 p by eommittef,P'^'"i'^''"'*"* •' 
 
 Parties may bo hoard against a bill on the ground of competition, 77. 
 
 Conference xcith Senate : 
 
 On disagreeing to their amendments to bills, 111. 
 
 Consent of parties : 
 
 Proof thereof required, in certain cases, C7, 92, 129. 
 
 Queen's consent to bills affecting the property, Ac, of the Crown, 109. 
 
144 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Consolidation 0/ bills: 
 
 Power may bo given to a committee to consolidate two or more bills into 
 one; 94. — Occasionally done without an instruction, ib. 
 
 Continuance of Proceedings : 
 
 Proceedings on private bills continued (on two occasions) to the next 
 Session, 62. 
 
 ^Counsel : 
 
 Heard at the Bar at the second reading, 93; — before consideration in com- 
 mittee of whole, 99, 101 ; — At the Bar of the Senate, on Divorce bills, 
 116, 136. 
 Promoters or opponents may be beard before the committee by counsel, 74. 
 No member of the House can act as counsel, 74. 
 A member of the other House may so act, by special leave, 74. 
 
 Croicn, Eights of : 
 
 Queen's consent cignified at third reading, to any bill affecting the pro- 
 perty or interests of the Crown, 109 j — to a bill for reversal of an at- 
 tainder, before the first reading, 117. 
 
 Deniaon, Right Hon. J. E. : 
 
 Evidence of Bight Hon. J. E. Denison, Speaker of House of Commons, on 
 private bill legislation, 102. 
 
 Disagreeing to amendments of Senate : 
 
 On disagreeing to the amendments of the Senate to a bill, a conference 
 may be desired, or a message may be sent to the Senate, communi- 
 cating the reasons for disagreeing, 111. 
 
 Divorce Bills : 
 
 Pertain to the Parliament of Canada, 13. 
 
 Introduced first into the Senate, 5. 
 
 To be prepared by petitioner, and printed at his expense, 137. 
 
 Special notice, and other preliminary proceedings ti. be proved thereon, 39, 
 
 134, 135. 
 Fee paid on presenting petition, 115, 137. 
 Fourteen days to elapse between 1st and 2nd readings; with aervice of 
 
 notice thereof, 115, 135. 
 Examination of petitioner and witnesses, at second reac'.ing, 115,136.— Mode 
 
 of summoning witnesses, 116, 136, 137. 
 
more bills into 
 '6. 
 
 3) to the next 
 
 loratioQ in com- 
 •n Divorce bills, 
 
 by counsel, 74. 
 
 74. 
 
 ffecting the pro- 
 iversal of an ai- 
 
 f Commons, on 
 
 1, a conference 
 natC; communi- 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 145 
 
 7. 
 
 ved thereon, 39, 
 
 with service of 
 115,136.— Mode 
 
 Divorce Bills — continued. 
 
 Counsel heard on bill, 116, 136. 
 
 Referred, after second reading, to a committee of whole, in the Senate, 116 j 
 
 — to a select committee, in the Commons, 5S. 
 Insertion of prohibitory clause, 116. 
 Evidence taken before the Senate applied foi- by Commons, and referred to 
 
 committee, 58. 
 Reference to be had to practice of the Lords, in unprovided casus, 117, 137. 
 
 Estate Bilk : 
 
 Usually originate in Ilouse of Lords, 5. 
 
 Evidence : 
 
 House may require evidence to be reported, on which committee hr e de- 
 cided that preamble is not proved, 83. 
 Committee of Commons may request that the evidence taken on a bill ori- 
 ginating in the Senate be laid before them, 87. — The like course by 
 a committee of Senate, 114. 
 Evidence taken by committee not generally reported, except by special 
 order, 95. 
 
 See Divorce Bills. Witneaaea. 
 
 Examiner for Standing Orders : 
 
 To report to Committee on Standing Orders concerning the notices given on 
 
 petitions for private bills, 36. 
 The same Examiners appointed for both Houses of Imperial Parliament, 
 
 36. (Note-I 
 
 F - :.'■■: ' uties : 
 
 Bill containing a clause exempting the promoters from the operation of the 
 Excise Laws for a certain period; mode of proceeding thereon, 105. 
 
 Extension 0/ poteers : 
 
 Extension of powers of a company to purposes foreign ti the original char- 
 ter, a ground for declaring preamble not proved, 82. 
 
 Evidence of consent of shareholders required by the Lords, on every bill 
 empowering an existing company to execute works other than those 
 for which it was originally constituted, Ac, 113. (Note.) 
 
 Bill should not be amended by the committee so as to enlarge its opera- 
 tions, 85 ; — but they can recommend the same to the House, 92. 
 
 13 
 
146 
 
 Fee» : — Sec Fines, 
 
 INDEX 
 
 Feet on private bills : 
 
 Payable (after seco/ic^ reading in the Senate, and o.ttQT Jirst reading in the 
 
 Commons) on all bills for any object of profit or advantage, 59, 126; 
 
 — in the House in which they originate only, 60, 127. 
 Charges for printing, &<:., levied at the same time, 59. 
 On Divorce Bills, in Senate, 115, 137. 
 Refunded in certain cases, by order of the House, 61; — in a subsequent 
 
 Session, 62. 
 Motions for /<^funding fees should be referred to the committee on the bill, 62. 
 Fees chargeJ in "British House of Commons, 60. (Note.) 
 
 Ferries : 
 
 Such as are international, or intercolonial, are under control of the Parlia- 
 ment of Canada, 13. 
 
 Fines : 
 
 Amount of any fines or fees to bo imposed, to be printed in bill in italics, 
 and to be filled up by the committee, 55, 8T. 
 
 First reading of hill : 
 
 In Senate, 54. (Note.)— In Commons, 54;— Referred after first reading, 56. 
 
 Foreign Corporations : 
 
 Status of foreign corporations in any Province, including such as may have 
 
 been chartered in another Province of the Dominion, 20. 
 Angell & Ames' remarks on foreign corporations, 22. 
 
 Government Trusts : 
 
 Bills relating to Government Trusts or Commissions, treated as public 
 bills, 10. 
 
 Harbour Bills : — See Tolls. 
 
 Informal introduction of bills : 
 
 "'lis which have been informallv introduced withdrawn, and new ones pre- 
 sented, 56. 
 
 Instructions : 
 
 To standing committees on private bills. 65, 94. 
 
 To a committee of whole, 103. 
 
 Object and effect of an instruction, mandatory or permissive, 104. 
 
 Instruction solicited by committee, in regard to a doubtful point, 65. 
 
 pl'Mji I 
 
ing ia the 
 5, 59, 126 ; 
 
 iubsequoQt 
 he bill; 62. 
 
 he Parlia- 
 l in italics, 
 
 ading, 56. 
 may have 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 147 
 
 as public 
 
 w onee pre- 
 
 94. 
 ,66. 
 
 Inturance Companiea : 
 
 Proceedings in Parliament as to the right of legislating in reference to In- 
 surance Companies, 25. 
 
 Jurisdiction, Legislative : 
 
 Clag''es of subjects for pr'eate bill legislation, pertaining exclusively to the 
 
 Parliament of Canada, 13.— To the Provincial Legislatures, 14. 
 Parliament may assume control of any works declared to be for the general 
 
 advantage of Canada, or of two or more Provinces, 15. 
 Railway bills passed by Parliament of Canada in first Session, 15. 
 Lines of railway, telegraph, <fcc., extending beyond the limits of a Pro- 
 vince, 16. 
 Incorporation of companies for the transaction of business throughout the 
 
 Dominion, 18. 
 Status, in Canada, of foreign corporations, and companies having Provin- 
 
 cial Charters, 20.— In the United States, 22. 
 Incorporation of Insurance Companies, 25. — Licence to be obtained from 
 
 Canadian Government, and investment to be made in Canadian secu - 
 
 rities, ib. 
 Incorporation of Boards of Trade, 26. 
 Suggestion for determining more accurately the question of jurisdiction, 27. 
 
 JuHtice, Administration of : 
 
 Local bills relating thereto treated as public bills, 9. 
 
 Law-suits : 
 
 Interference with pending suits, a ground for declaring preamble not 
 proved, ?2. 
 
 Letters Patent : 
 
 Copy thereof to be attached to any bill for confirming the same, 55, 126. 
 Omission to attach the same, in a certain case, rectified by the House, 55. 
 
 Locus standi: 
 
 Of parties petitioning against a bill, 77. 
 
 Lords, House of: 
 
 Certain classes of bills originate therein, 5. 
 
 Arrangement between Lords and Commons concerning the bills to be first 
 considered in each House, 5. 
 
1 
 
 148 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 
 1 l' 
 
 I ■ 
 ih 
 
 Marrlarjt and Divorce : 
 
 Placed under control of the Parliament of Canada, 13. 
 
 Member » : 
 
 May not act as Parliamentary Agents, 80. 
 
 Tbo member presenting a petition takes charge of the bill through its dif- 
 ferent stages, 31. 
 
 May not act as counsel, before the Ilouse of which they are members, or 
 any committee thereof, 74. 
 
 Members of the other House may so act, by special permission, 74. 
 
 Attendance of a member for examination as a witness, 78, 79 ', — of a Peer, 
 79. (Note.) 
 
 Right of members (not of the committee) to be present, 79. 
 
 Name Bills : 
 
 Usually originate in House of Lords, 5. 
 
 liafuralizationa : 
 
 Placed under control of the Parliament of Canada, 13. 
 Naturalization bills usually originate in House of Lords, 5. . 
 
 Notices of applications /or private hills : 
 
 Notices required on ordinary private bills, 38, 124 ; — toll-bridge bills, 39, 
 
 124, .25 ;— iivorvo Dills, 39, 134. 
 Certain applications exempt therefrom, 40. 
 
 Reported on to Committee on Standing Orders (in Commons) by the Ex- 
 aminer, 36. 
 Reported on by Committee on Standing Orders, without special reference, 
 
 35, 125. 
 Proof of compliance with Rules relative to notice, 37. 
 Want of notice, in some cases, sapplied by a provision in the bill, for the 
 
 protection of interests of other parties, 41, 46, 49 j — or informality 
 
 waived by committee, 43. 
 Evidence of publicity admitted, to supply want of formal notice, 42. ' 
 Suspension of the Rule may be recommended on certain grounds, 44. 
 No motion for suspension of Rule can be entertained till committee has 
 
 reported, 47. 
 Insufficient notice being reported (without a favorable recommendation) 
 
 stays all proceedings, 47. 
 Notice must be specific and dear, 48. 
 
'ougb its dif- 
 
 motubers, or 
 
 1,74. 
 J— of a Peer, 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 149 
 
 idgo bills, 39, 
 
 j) by the Ex- 
 )ial reference, 
 
 lO bill, for the 
 )r informality 
 
 ce, 42. ' 
 nds, 44. 
 iommittee has 
 
 >inmendatioD) 
 
 Notices o/ appUeatlon$ /or private bilU — continued. 
 
 Petitioners restricted within the terms of their notice, 49. 
 
 Additional evide ice of notice admitted, after an unfavorable report, and 
 supplementary report made thereon, 52. 
 
 Not to be enquired into by committee on bill, 67 ;— except to compare pro- 
 visions of bill with the terms of the notice, 68. 
 
 Committee on bill must call attention of the House to any provision therein 
 not contemplated in the notice, 6S, 90; — may not insert any new 
 provisions, except such as are covered by the notice, 85, 91 ; — but 
 may confine its provisions within terms of notice, 90 ; — Any exten- 
 sion beyond such terms may be recommended to the House, 92. 
 
 Parties may not avail themselves, for their own purposes, of a notice given 
 by others, 52; — but if a bill be abandoned by its promoters, the 
 committee may permit other parties bO proceed with it, 94. 
 
 Notices required in Imperial Parliament, 38. (Note.) 
 
 Notice of contideratton of bill : 
 
 (Senate) 1 week's notice to be given by committee on any bill requiring no- 
 tice under 51st Rule, on bills originating in the Senate ; — 24 hours' 
 notice only required on bills from the other House, 57, 71, 128. 
 
 (Commons) 10 days' notice to be given by committee, on bills originating 
 in the Commons ; — two days' notice only required on bills from the 
 Senate, 67, 71, 128. 
 
 Usually reduced, near close of Session, 72. 
 
 Occasionally dispensed with, 72. 
 
 Cannot be dispensed with generally, but on the recommendation of two or 
 more of the committees connected with private bills, 72. 
 
 Upon the transfer of a bill from one committee to another, the notice already 
 given is generally held to be sufficient, 65. 
 
 Notice of neio provisions : 
 
 No new provisions may be inserted in bill, by which the interest of parties 
 
 not represented before the committee can bo affected, without duo 
 
 notice to such parties, 91. 
 Notice to be given of amendments proposed in committee of whole, 105, 131;—' 
 
 after report of committee of whole, 108 ; — at third reading, 105, 131. 
 
 Notice of auspenaion of Rules : 
 
 No Standing Order relative to private bills suspended without duo notice, 
 110, 131. 
 
 *l 
 

 i i 
 1 ' 
 
 i ; 
 ' ( 
 
 
 I \\ 150 INDEX. 
 
 
 ' 
 
 i 
 
 1 OJicera of th« Houne : 
 
 Pet 
 
 1 
 
 May not act an Parliamentary agents, 31. 
 
 1 j Oppo$ition to private bills : 
 
 \ : Unusual at second reading, except on gener<.l principles, or on the ground 
 
 j ' of interference with public rights, 98. 
 
 1 j Before select committee, 72. 
 
 
 '^B 
 
 ! ' Petitions against a bill, stand referred to committee thereon, 56, 127. 
 
 
 Arrangement between the parties for selection of a day for considering an 
 
 
 
 1 opposed bill, 71. 
 
 
 ," 
 
 Opponents should present a petition, specifying grounds of objection, 73. — 
 
 Prc< 
 
 i 
 
 I Limited to the grounds so stated, io. — May be heard by counsel, 74. 
 
 
 :, 
 
 Opposition held to be abindonod, if no parties appear when petition is 
 
 
 'i 
 
 I ! read, 73. 
 
 
 :'! 
 
 1 i Locus standi of opponents, 77. 
 
 
 
 Opposition to clauses, 78. 
 
 
 '.: 
 
 [ 1 Parties having diverse interests may not avail themselves, on their own ao- 
 
 
 
 1 count, of a notice issued by other parties, 52 ;— but if a bill be aban- 
 
 
 ;i 1 1 doned by its promoters, the committee may pormit other parties to 
 
 
 jj 1 proceed with it, 94. 
 
 
 1 ' 
 
 ;!i[ Orders o/ the Day : 
 
 
 1 i Place assigned to private bills on the Orders of each day in the week, 100. 
 
 
 :| Parliamentary Agents : 
 
 
 
 Employment of, in Commons, 29, 132. 
 
 
 
 { Cannot act without the authority of the Speaker. 30, 133. 
 
 T> 
 
 ' 
 
 ' j j Mode of qualifying, 30. 
 
 rrev 
 
 '.I 
 
 1 1 ; Members and officers of the Ilouse disqualified from acting, 30. 
 
 
 1; Registered, 31. 
 
 Prin 
 
 j j Subject to a prohibition to practise, for any violation of the Rules or prac- 
 
 
 1 ! tice of Parliament, 30, 133. 
 
 Prin 
 
 :|i! i 1 Patents of Invention : 
 
 
 ||! 1 \ Placed under control of the Parliament of Canada 13. 
 
 
 1 
 
 I; 1 
 
 j: . Petitions : 
 
 
 ■:l 
 
 j\ Every private bill to be based on a petition, 32. (Form in Appendix III.) 
 li ' —Certain bills rejected, not being founded on petitions, 10, 33. 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 'j i Not to be signed by agents, but by the parties themselves, 32. 
 
 ' 
 
 i 
 
 i 1 Mode of presentation to each branch of the Legislature, 32. 
 
 1 
 
 i . 
 
 1; i ^ 
 i i ' ; 
 
 
the ground 
 
 127. 
 lidoriag an 
 
 ition, 73.— 
 unsel, 74. 
 petition is 
 
 )ir own ao- 
 
 11 be abaa- 
 
 parties to 
 
 eek; 100. 
 
 3 or prac- 
 
 adix III.) 
 33. 
 
 INDEX. 151 
 
 Pe<i(ton8— continued. 
 
 Time for presentation limited, 33, 122. — Extension of time, 33. 
 
 Mode of proceeding for obtaining leave after expiration of time, 34, 51. 
 
 Reported on bj Committee on Standing Orders, without special reference, 
 
 35, 125. 
 Petitions for or against bills stand referred to the committee thereon, 56, 127* 
 Fetit/.ons from promoters, for amendments to their bills, 75. 
 Petitions should be presented bj opponents, specifying grounds of ob- 
 jection, 72. — Petitioner limited to the grounds so staged, 73, 78. 
 Petitioners may be heard bj counsel, 74, 98. 
 
 Preamhlo : 
 
 Question pat on preamble before clauses (in private bills), 76. 
 
 Petitions against preamble, 72. 
 
 Petitioners against particular clauses otily, not hoard against the preamble, 
 73, 78. 
 
 If preamble be not proved, the decision to be reported, with the reasons 
 therefor, 81, 130. 
 
 Committee cannot re- consider and reverso :'jch decision, nnless authorized 
 by the House, 80, 84. 
 
 House may require tha evidence on which the decision was based, to be re- 
 ported, 83. 
 
 Alterations in preamble, to be specially reported, 85, 130. 
 
 Power to make alterations limited within terms of petition and notice, un- 
 less by permissior of the House, 85. 
 
 Preamble proved, 86. 
 
 Precious question : 
 
 Cannot be moved in committee, 86. 
 
 Principle of hill : 
 
 Affirmed at second reading, 97. 
 
 Printing of private bills : 
 
 To be printed in both languages (before _/?r8t reading in Commons, and bo- 
 fore second reading in Senate), 54, 127. 
 
 French version occasionally dispensed with, 54. (Note.) 
 
 To be re-printed, after amendment by committee, if amendments are exten- 
 sive, 95. 
 
 Promoters charged with the cost of printing 500 in English and 250 in 
 French, with the Statutes, if passed, 59, 127. 
 
 Printing of Private Acts, 120. 
 
Ilil!!'^ 
 
 Il-:i! 
 
 
 152 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 liijl 
 
 liiiM 
 
 l!i 
 
 ^;ii:i- 
 
 ■ii. 
 
 M ■ 
 
 ill'! 
 
 ■ Bjr • 
 if ' ! 
 
 Private bills : 
 
 Proceedings in passing the same, of a judicial character, 1. 
 
 Origin and progress of Private Bill system in Can la, 2. 
 
 Alphens Todd's Report on the subject, in 1847, 2. 
 
 Assimilation of practice in the two Houses, 3. 
 
 In which House they may originate, 4, 115, 117- 
 
 Definition of a private bill, 7. 
 
 Semi-private bills, 7. 
 
 Divorce Bills, — See Livorce Billa, 
 
 Certain classes treated as public bills, 9, 10. 
 
 Bill containing a clause exempting thb corporators from excise duties; 
 
 course of procedure thereon, 105. 
 Notices required, — See Noticea of application! for private billa. 
 To be based on a petition, 32, 126. — Certain bills rejected, not being founded 
 
 on petitions, 10, 33. 
 Substance of two or more petitions combined into one bill by promoters, 56. 
 
 — Two or more bills combined into one by committee, 94. 
 Presentation of bills (after proof of Notice). 54, 126. — Limitation of time, 
 
 56, 122. 
 May, in case of urgency, be advanced two or more stages ia one day, 110. — 
 
 Notice required of a motion for suspending a standing order, 110, 131. 
 To be prepared in both languages, by the promoters, 54, 127. 
 To be printed before first reading ia Commons, and before second reading in 
 
 Senate, 54, 127. 
 Bills informally introduced not proceeded with, 10. — Withdrawn, and new 
 
 bills presented, 56. 
 Precedence given to private bills on certain days, in the Commons, 100. 
 Referred to a Standi, -» Committee, 56. — Divorce bills, to a committee of 
 
 whole, in the Ser , 116; — and to a selected committee in the Com- 
 mons, U8. 
 Proceedings before standing committee, — See Private Bill Committee. 
 Opposition before committee, — See Oj^poaition to private billa. 
 Extension of operation of a private bill so as to change it to a public bill, 92. 
 Second reading, and proceedings thereat, 97, 130. — Counsel may be heard, 
 
 98. 
 Consideration in committee of whole, 101. — See Committee of whole. 
 Notice to be given of amendments proposed in committee of whole, 1C5, 131. — 
 
 After report of committee of whole, 108. — Or at third reading, 109, 131. 
 
 
ixciee duties; 
 
 jeing founded 
 
 iromoters, 56. 
 
 ition of time, 
 
 le day, 110. — 
 der, 110, 131. 
 
 nd reading in 
 
 iwn, and new 
 
 ions, 100. 
 committee of 
 B in the Com- 
 
 imittee. 
 
 ublic bill, 92. 
 ay be heard, 
 
 e, 105,131.— 
 ing, 109, 131. 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 153 
 
 Private Bilh — continued. 
 
 Proceedings in House, after report of committee of whole, 103, 
 Re-commitment of bill, to standing committee, 95 ; — to committee of the 
 
 whole, 108. 
 Third reading, 109. 
 
 Queen's consent signified at this stage, when rights of Crown aie affected, 109. 
 Bill passed and sent to Senate, 109. 
 
 Returned from the Senate, with amendments; amendments referred ilO. 
 Conference desired on disagreeing to certain amendments. 111. 
 Bills from the Commons not proceeded with in the Senate; c- ru't.ee 
 
 appointed to search journals. 111. 
 Proceedings on private bills in Penate, 113. 
 Royal Assent, 119. 
 Every Act declared " public" that doe? not contain a provision declaring it 
 
 <' private," 119. 
 Printing of Private Acts, 120. 
 Arrangement (in certain Sessions) for taking up at the next Session, any 
 
 private bills undisposed of at the prorogation, 62. 
 
 P.lvate Bill Committee (or other committees of a like character) ; 
 Appointment and powers, 64. 
 All private bills referred to this (or some similar) committee; Petitions for 
 
 and against stand referred, 56, 127, 
 Committee may be directed to report a bill back forthwith, 65. 
 Instructions; 65. — Solicited by committee with regard to a doubtful point, 
 
 93 ; — an extension of their powers in a certain case, 66. 
 To call attention to any provisions in the bill not covered by the notice, 66. 
 To require proof of the qualification and consent of persons proposed to be 
 
 incorporated, 67. 
 Not to entertain questions relative to compliance with standing ordera 
 
 (notices) unless specially directed, 67. 
 To give notice of day appointed for consideration of certain bills, 71, 128. 
 Te ascertain whether the provisions of the bill agree with the terms of the 
 
 notice, 68. 
 Casting vote of chairman, 69, 129. 
 
 Each member of committee present should vote on every question, 69. 
 Committee cannot sit (without special leave) during sitting of the House, 70. 
 
 — Leave given, in Imperial Parliament, to sit during morning sittings 
 
 of House, 70. (Note.) 
 
'11 
 
 ;ll 
 
 ii 
 
 '■i> 
 
 111 
 
 154 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Private Bill Commi«cc-^continued. 
 
 Proceedings in committee, 71. 
 
 Filled-up copy of bill to be deposited before day for consideration thereof, 
 75, 128. 
 
 Preamble read, and petitions against, 76. 
 
 Promoters then heard, and petitioners afterwards, 77. 
 
 Petitioners against particular clauses only, not heard against preamble, 78. 
 
 Zocua standi of petitioners, 77. 
 
 Examination of witnesses, 77, 78. 
 
 Committee room an open court, 79. 
 
 Room cleared for deliberation, 79. 
 
 Plight of members (not of the committee) to be present, 79. 
 
 Question put on preamble, 80. 
 
 If not proved, to be .o reported, and the reasons assigned, 80, 130. 
 
 Committee cannot re-consider and reverse such decision, unless authorized 
 by the House, 80, 84. 
 
 House may require the evidence on the preamble to be reported, 83. 
 
 Alterations in preamble to be specially reported, with reasons therefor, 85, 130. 
 
 Power to make alterations limited, 85. 
 
 Committee cannot amend bill so as to extend its operations, without leave 
 of the House, 85. — Exceptional case, tb. — But can recommend that its 
 provisions be so extended, or thai it be made a public bill, 92. 
 
 Proceedings on clauses, after preamble is proved, 86. 
 
 Unusual provisions in the bill to be specially referred to in report, 87, 129. 
 
 Persons whose rights are aflfected, may be examined touching their consent, 
 67, 129. 
 
 To insert the maximum rates of tolls or fees to be imposed, 87. 
 
 Amended bill, and each amendment, to be signed by chairman, 89, 130. 
 
 Amendments of an unusual character to be specially mentioned in report, 90. 
 
 Bules to be observed by committee in framing amendments, 90. 
 
 Every bill referred must be reported, 94, 129. 
 
 Report that certain bills referred are public rather than private, 7 ; — or, might 
 more advantageously be referred to another committee, 65. 
 
 If a bill be abandoned by its promoters, the fact is reported ; or other par- 
 ties may be allowed to proceed with it, 94. 
 
 Bill, when reported, may be referred back, 95. 
 
 Evidence not usually reported by committee, except by special order, 95. 
 
 Time for receiving reports limited, 96. 
 
 I !■ 
 
sration thereof, 
 
 preamble, 78. 
 
 0, 130. 
 
 less authorized 
 
 ■ted, 83. 
 tierefor, 85, 130. 
 
 , without leave 
 mmend that its 
 )il], 92. 
 
 sport, 87, 129. 
 their consent, 
 
 J7. 
 
 D, 89, 130. 
 
 d in report, 90. 
 
 0. 
 
 , 7 ; — or, might 
 65. 
 ; or other par- 
 
 cial order, 95. 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 155 
 
 Private Bill Committee — continued. 
 
 Bill, after report, placed on the Orders for a second reading, 97, 130. 
 
 Bill, as reported by the committee, generally adopted by the House without 
 alteration, 102, — Amendments of committee not treated as amend- 
 ments, 103. 
 
 Pricate Bill days : 
 
 Certain days appointed (in Commons) for coneideration of private bills, 100. 
 
 Private Bill Office : 
 
 Established, 3, 131. 
 
 Private Bill liegiater : 
 
 To be kept in Private BUI Office, 31, 131. 
 
 Provincial Companies, or Works : 
 
 Placed under control of the Provincial Legislatures, 14. 
 
 " Pullic Act" : 
 
 Every privf te Act to bo deemed a public Act, unless it contains a provision 
 to the contrary, 119. 
 
 Pullic Works : 
 
 Local Works arc under the control of the Provincial Legislatures, 14. 
 Such works as extend beyond the limits of a single Province, are placed 
 
 under control of the Parliament of Canada, 14. 
 Such also (within any Province) as are declared to be for the general 
 
 advantage, 14. — Examples of the latter, 15, 16. 
 Definition ofthe term "extending beyond the limits of a Province," 16. 
 Bills relating *o public works under Government control, treated as public 
 bills, 10. 
 
 Qu€' 's Con$ent : — See Crown, liighta of. 
 
 Pailii '/« ; 
 
 Su a lines of Railway, Canal, or Telegraph, as extend beyond the limits 
 of a Province, placed under control of the Parliament of Canada, 14. 
 — Definition of the term " extending beyond (he limits of a Pro- 
 vince," 16. 
 
 Such also as are declared to be for the general advantage, 14. — Instances 
 thereof cited, 15. 
 
 Expediency of including all Railways intersecting the Qraud Trunk 
 within this class, 16. 
 
 tt: 
 
■t;"i 1 
 
 ■n\ ; 
 
 156 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 Railways — continued. 
 
 Standing Committee on Railways, Canals, and Telegraph Lines, appoint- 
 ment of, 64. 
 
 All bills relating to Railways, Ac, referred, 56. 
 
 Instructions to, 66. 
 
 Powers and duties of the committoo are similar to those of the Private Bill 
 Committee, — See Private Bill Cotumitlee. 
 
 Rates or Tolls : 
 
 Bills involving the same ought to be first brought into the Commons, 4. 
 Amount thereof to be printed in the bill in italics, to be filled up by 
 
 committee, 55, St. 
 Practide of Imperial Parliament in regard to imposition of a local rate, 89, 
 
 (and Note.) 
 
 Re-commilment : 
 
 Bills may be re-committed, after report of committee of whole, 108; — before 
 third reading, 109. — To the select committee, 95. 
 
 Reports of committees on privata bills: 
 That preamble is not proved, 80. 
 That alterations have been made in the preamble, 85. 
 Recommending an extension of provisions of bill, 92. 
 Calling attention to unusual provisions, or such as exceed the limits of the 
 
 notice, — or amendments of a peculiar nature, 87^, 129. 
 That certain bills referred are public rather than private in their character, 8. 
 Every bill referred must be reported, 94, 129. 
 Evidence not usually reported, except by special order, 95. 
 Time for receiving reports limited, 96, 122. 
 
 Representation : 
 
 Local bills afife|«ting the Representation, treated as public bills, 9. 
 
 Royal Assent: 
 
 Given to private bills in the same manner as public bills, 119. 
 
 Rulet relative io private hills : 
 
 Notice to be given of a motion to suspend any Rule, 110, 131. 
 
 No motion for suspending 51st Rule (Notices) to be made until after report 
 of Committee on Standing Orders, 47, 126. — Motion made, when re- 
 quired, after report, and before presentation of bill, 54. 
 
 Published in Official Gazette, and the substance in other papers, 123. 
 
 JSa 
 
 Sen 
 Sen 
 
 
 fj' ■ 
 
nes, appoint- 
 
 Q Private Bill 
 
 mmons, 4. 
 filled up by 
 
 local rate, 89, 
 
 108 ;— before 
 
 limits of the 
 character, 8. 
 
 il after report 
 ,de, when re- 
 
 s, 123. 
 
 INDEX. 157 
 
 Savings Banks : 
 
 Placed under control of the Parliament of Canada, 13. 
 
 Second reading of bill : 
 
 Principle affirmed at the second reading, 97. 
 
 Postponement thereof 3 or 6 months, 100. 
 
 Opposition at this stage unusual, 98. 
 
 Counsel heard at second reading, 98. 
 
 Referred after second reading (in Senate, to a standing co.Timittee), 57 ;-' 
 
 (in Commona, to a committee of whole), 101. 
 A bill thrown out in the Commons (G . B.) at this stage, becau'^e it trenciioJ 
 
 on public rights, 99. (Note.) 
 
 Semi-private hills ; 
 
 Certain bills of this class treated as public bills, 7. 
 
 Senate : 
 
 Assimilation of their Private Bill Rules to those' of the Commons, 3. — 
 Exceptions, 113. 
 
 Bills from the Senate reported on by Committee on Standing Orders after 
 first reading, when no previous report has been made on a petition, 
 35, 125. 
 
 Divorce Bills introduced first in the Senate, 5. — Bills for reversal of attain- 
 ders, or for the restoration of honors, 117. 
 
 Proof of notice, and other preliminary proceedings in Divorce cases, in 
 the Senate, 39. 
 
 Bills presented in the Senate, without a motion for leave, 54. (Note.) 
 
 Evidence taken on bills originating in the Senate, communicated to com- 
 mittee of the Commons, when required, 87. — The like, in the Senate, 
 with regard to bills originating in the Commons, 114. 
 
 Amendments of the Senate to bills from the Commons, are referred to the 
 same committee of the Commons to which the bill was originally re- 
 ferred, 110, 131. — Practice in Senate with regard to amendments of the 
 Commons, 111, 131. 
 
 Conference with the Senate on disagreeing to their amendments to bills, 111. 
 
 Journals of Senate may be searched by a Committee of Commons, with 
 reference to certain bills not proceeded with, 111. 
 
 Proceedings on private bills in the Senate, 113. 
 
 14 
 
'■i'iiin 
 
 158 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 mt 
 
 m\ 
 
 I! 
 
 M 
 
 I 
 
 M 
 m 
 
 Sharehi Iders i 
 
 Miy not be heard against a bill, unless their interests are distinct Arom those 
 
 of the company, 78. 
 Proof of their consent, in certain cases, 67, 113 (Kote}> 129. 
 
 Shipping ;— See Steam or other Ships : 
 
 Standing Orders Committee ; 
 
 Earliest reference of petitions to, 3. 
 
 Report (to the committee) by the Examiner for standing orders, 38. 
 
 Mode of voting in committee, 37. 
 
 Sitting of committee, 37. , 
 
 Mode of proving compliance with standing orders, 37. 
 
 Examine (without special reference) all petitions for private bills, and report 
 
 whether notice has been given, with a special recommendation m 
 
 certain cases, 35, 125. — Examine bills from the Senate (if no previous 
 
 report has been made on a petition) after the first reading, ib. 
 Report certain petitions exempt from notice, 40. 
 Recommend that provisions be made in the bill, to supply want of notice, in 
 
 certain cases, 40, 50. 
 Receive evidence of publicity, to supply want of formal notice, 42. 
 Occasionally take on themselves to waive informality in notice, 43. 
 Grounds on which suspension of Rule may be recommended, 44. 
 No motion for suspension of Rule to be entertained till committee has 
 
 reported, 47, 126. 
 Special reports as to variance between notice and petition, 35, 47, 49, 51 ; — 
 
 insufficient notice, 47. 
 Petitions referred back, for reconsideration, 48, 62. 
 Supplementary reports, concerning evidence of notice produced since 
 
 former report, 52. 
 Amendments made to a bill, in excess of the notice, should be referred to 
 
 Standing Orders Committee, 108. 
 
 Steam or other Ships, Lines of; 
 
 Such lines as extend beyond the limits of a single Province, placed under 
 control of the Parliament of Canada, 14. 
 
 Taxes : 
 
 Bills involving any tax should be first brought into the Commons, 4. 
 
 Telegraph Hnet ;— See JiMiluia^s, 
 
ict from thflfle 
 
 INDEX. 
 
 159 
 
 Jcra, 38. 
 
 Us, and report 
 imendation 'u 
 [if no previous 
 ng, ib. 
 
 it of notice, in 
 
 5,42. 
 ce, 43. 
 44. 
 committee has 
 
 ), 47, 49, 51 ;— 
 
 roduced since 
 )e referred to 
 
 placed under 
 
 OQS, 4. 
 
 Third Jieadi'nr/ of hill : 
 Ordered, 108. 
 
 Precedence given to private bills over other Orders of the Day, 109. 
 Verbal amendments only may be proposed at third reading; but bill may bo 
 
 re-committed, 109. 
 Rights of Crown, 109. 
 Form of passing bill, 109. 
 
 Tolls : 
 
 Bills involving imposition of tolls should be first brought into tho Com- 
 
 mons, 4. 
 Amount thereof to be printed in tho bill in italics, 55. 
 Maximum rates to be inserted by committee, 87. 
 Exceptional practice of originating Bridge, Canal, and Harbour Tolls, in 
 
 committee of the whole, in some instances, 87 ; — To bo discontinued 
 
 for the future, 89. 
 
 Trade, Boards of : 
 
 Incorporation thereof by Parliament, and by Provincial Legislatures, 26. 
 
 Unprovided cases : 
 
 Resort to bo had, in all unprovided cases, to the practice of the Imperial 
 Parliament, 132, 133. 
 
 Unusual jtrovisions : 
 
 Committee to make special mention in report, of any unusual provisions in 
 petition or bill, 50, 87, 129 ; — or of amendments of an unusual 
 character, 90. 
 
 Witnesses i 
 
 Committees on private bills may examine witnesses upon oath, 68, 77. 
 Expenses of witnesses defrayed by the parties in whose interest they are 
 
 summoned, 68, 116. — May be claimed before examination, 78, 
 Cross-examination, 77« 
 Attendance of a member as a witness, 78, 79. 
 Cannot correct evidence, but by a subsequent examination, 78. 
 Examined, in Divorce cases, at Bar of Senate, 116, 136. 
 Mode of summoning witnesses in Divorce cases, 116, 136. 
 Arrest of witnesses refusing to attend, 116, 137. 
 
 FINIS,