^ \r ^ 
 
 > 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 -4 
 
 // 
 
 
 {< 
 
 1.0 
 
 1.1 
 
 2.0 
 
 m 
 
 11-25 mil 1.4 
 
 I 
 
 mi; 
 
 ly^i 
 
 1.6 
 
 fliotographic 
 .Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WIST MAIN STRiiT 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 #.>' 
 
 '^ 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 r 
 
Tachnical and Bibliographic Notaa/Notas tachniquaa at bibliographiquaa 
 
 Tlia instituta haa attamptad to obtain tha baat 
 original copy avaiiabia for filming. Faaturaa of thia 
 copy which may ba bibiiographically uniqua, 
 which may altar any of tha imagaa in tha 
 raproduction, or which may aignificantly changa 
 tha uaual mathod.of filming, ara chackad balow. 
 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 
 n 
 
 n 
 
 Colourad covara/ 
 Couvartura da couiaur 
 
 r~~| Covara damagad/ 
 
 Couvartura andommagte 
 
 Covara rastorad and/or laminatad/ 
 Couvartura raataurte at/ou palliculAa 
 
 I I Covar titia miaaing/ 
 
 La titra da couvartura manqua 
 
 Colourad mapa/ 
 
 Cartaa gtographiquaa an couiaur 
 
 Colourad ink (i.a. othar than blua or black)/ 
 Encra da couiaur (i.a. autra qua blaua ou noira) 
 
 Colourad plataa and/or illuatrationa/ 
 Pianchaa at/ou illuatrationa an couiaur 
 
 Bound with othar matarial/ 
 RailA avac d'autraa documanta 
 
 Tight binding may cauaa ahadowa or diatortion 
 along intarior margin/ 
 
 La n iiura aarria paut cauaar da i'ombra ou da la 
 diatortion la long da la marga IntAriaura 
 
 Blank laavaa addad during raatoration may 
 appaar within tha taxt. Whanavar poaaibia, thaaa 
 hava baan omittad from filming/ 
 II aa paut qua cartainaa pagaa bianchas aJoutAaa 
 iora d'una raatauration apparaiaaant dana la taxta, 
 mala, ioraqua cala Atait poaaibia. caa pagaa n'ont 
 paa 4tA filmAaa. 
 
 Additional commanta:/ 
 Commantairaa aupplAmantalraa.- 
 
 Th« 
 tol 
 
 L'Inatitut a microfilm* la malliaur axamplaira 
 qu'il lui a At* poaaibia da sa procurar. Laa ditaila 
 da cat axamplaira qui aont paut-Atra uniquaa du 
 point da vua bibliographiqua, qui pauvant modlfiar 
 una imaga raprodulta. ou qui pauvant axigar una 
 modification dana la m^hoda normala da filmaga 
 aont indiquia ci-daaaoua. 
 
 □ Colourad pagaa/ 
 Pagaa da couiaur 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Pagaa damagad/ 
 Pagaa andommagtea 
 
 Pagaa raatorad and/or laminatad/ 
 Pagaa raatauriaa at/ou palliculAaa 
 
 Pagaa diacolourad, atainad or foxad/ 
 Pagaa dAcolortea, tachattea ou piqutea 
 
 Pagaa datachad/ 
 Pagaa dAtachtea 
 
 Th< 
 poi 
 of 
 fiinl 
 
 Ori 
 bat 
 tha 
 aioi 
 oth 
 fira 
 aioi 
 or 
 
 HShowthrough/ 
 Tranaparanca 
 
 Tranaparanca 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality InAgaia da I'impraaaion 
 
 Includaa aupplamantary matarii 
 Comprand du material auppKmantaira 
 
 rn Quality of print varlaa/ 
 
 I I Includaa aupplamantary matarial/ 
 
 Thi 
 aha 
 TIW 
 wh 
 
 Ma 
 difl 
 anti 
 bag 
 rig» 
 raqi 
 mai 
 
 |~~| Only adition availabia/ 
 
 Saula Mition diaponibia 
 
 Pagaa wholly or partially obacurad by arrata 
 alipa, tiaauaa, ate. hava baan rafiimad to 
 anaura tha baat poaaibia imaga/ 
 Laa pagaa totalamant ou partiallamant 
 obacurciaa par un fauillat d'arrata. una palura, 
 ate. ont 4tA filmAaa h nouvaau da fapon A 
 obtanir la maillaura imaga poaaibia. 
 
 Thia itam la fllmad at tha raduction ratio chackad balow/ 
 
 Ca documant aat f ilmi au taux da rMuctlon indiqu* ci-daaaoua. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 aox 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 y 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
Th« copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce A la 
 ginArositA de: 
 
 Bibliothdque nationale du Canada 
 
 The Images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Les Images suivantes ont 4t4 reproduites avec ie 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetA de l'exemplaire fiimA, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies In printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated Impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated Impression. 
 
 Les exemplalres orlginaux dont ia couverture en 
 papier est imprim6e sont filmte en commen^ant 
 par Ie premier plat et en terminant soit par ia 
 dernlAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'Impression ou d 'illustration, soit par ie second 
 plat, salon Ie cas. Tous les autres exemplalres 
 orlginaux sont filmte en commenpant par ia 
 premiere page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'Impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernlAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol -^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaltra sur ia 
 dernlAro image de cheque microfiche, selon Ie 
 cas: Ie symbols — ► signlfie "A SUIVRE", Ie 
 symbols y signlfie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, cherts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely Included In one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams Illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmte d des taux de reduction diffirents. 
 Lorsque ie document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA, 11 est fllmA A partir 
 de Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant ie nombre 
 d'imeges nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 lllustrent la mAthode. 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
Jr,r-%" 
 
 'i-W^. 
 
 l^^^v*! 
 
 ?s. 
 
 «»<» 
 
 AN S W E R 
 
 c 1— •'"^'"'^ 
 
 TO 
 
 Dr. Mayhew's Obfervations 
 
 ON THE 
 
 CHARTER ANP CONDUCT 
 
 O T T H E 
 
 SOCIETY 
 
 F O R T H E ' 
 
 PROPAGATION of the GOSPEL 
 
 in Foreign Parts. 
 
 3y ifk^T^aj JccJOby* — 4/^. ^ 
 
 ■ ■■' ■ ■ ' ' ■ " " ' .11. -.11 II I / "II. I II I I I I I. . . .■I. — I I . 
 
 
 
 wtmm>m,m^, \ n » i i n i > 
 
 LONDON: Printed. //(T^ ^ //^ 
 
 5 O iJ T O N : Re-Printed, and Sold by ». 
 • and S. Draper, in Newbury- Strffct ; Ede« 
 and Oihh in ^icen-StruS ; & T. & J.f LiJjET^ 
 Jn CornbiU. J 7 64. 
 
I' 
 
 \ . 
 
 
 '^T 
 
 
 
 r . 1 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 I 
 
 K >■ 
 
 f 
 
'■- i*- 
 
 ^ s 3 
 
 A N 
 
 ANSWER 
 
 T Q 
 
 Dr. JMayhevJs Obfcrvations. 
 
 r 
 
 i 
 
 ( 
 
 DR. Mayhewh ^ Book is written* partly ag^inft 
 the Church of £/f^/(//ti in general ; partly againft 
 the Condu£^ of the Society for the Propagation of 
 the Gofpelf in fettling Minifters of that Chur<;h 
 in the Majfacbufetts and (UnfieRicut ; partly againft ap- 
 pointing Bi(hops to refide in his Majefty's American Co- 
 lonies. The nrft, though not formally prppofed by him 
 as one Head of his Work, appears to b^ in his View throvigh- 
 out the whole of it. And if Satisfaclipn be previpufly 
 given to candid Pcrfbns on this Point, they will be bett^ 
 prepared for conHdertng the other two. 
 
 He objeds againft the Conftitution at)4 Worfliip of the 
 Church of f/r^/dW, as unfcriptural f Now even b^id he 
 atteniptf d to bring Proof of this* it wouki only lead intp 
 9 long Difpute, very little conne£led with his prqfe(7e^ 
 3ut^{ti and into which he declares, // wa4 h no Means bis ^ 
 *JPeJign t9 enter ^, But inftcad of Prppfs, hc contgnts 
 himlelf with bold Aflcrdons, reproachful N^n^cf , and lu- 
 difcrpys ReDrefentatjons ; a likely Method ind^^d to plea^ 
 ab? PreJHdiCSdi and carry the Thpu|;ht|e(s a}opg with him, 
 
 but 
 * The ,<^ot(|tSoM oat of Dr. Ma^hevt't Obfcrvauont are taken fmxa 
 ijtt i?i^/i^diiio8.wKid) cootaiot 147 Paget. thcAntiriaan bath i ;6 1 
 
4 ^n Anfwcr to Dr. MaWe^ 
 
 .btttnoC to perfuade the Cooilderate and Judicious. What* 
 ever the DoAor may chink of our Church, it hath ever 
 been highly honoured by foreign Proteftants. The 
 Jjitherans prefer it to the Calvtnift Communion, the 
 Calvinifls to the Lutheran t the Greets to both : which may 
 fufficiently judify the Exprcdion, underftood in a Latitude 
 not uncommon, that all other Perdiadons ef^eem it next to 
 their own f. And further, moH;, if nor aU of them, blame 
 the Englijh Diflenters for fcparaiing from it. The Doctor 
 feems to entertain the worfe C)pinion of it, becanfe the 
 Members of the Church of Rtme likewife efleem it more 
 than they do others *. But we have to reply, that they 
 hate it more al(b, as the mod dangerous Enemy to their 
 Caufe, and ftrongeft Bulwark of the Reformation. If 
 there be fome Appointments in it, which the Scripture doth 
 not require ; (b have there been from the firft in the 
 Church of New-England too, as may be fcen in the 
 Appendix to the Hiftory of that Country, written by Mr. 
 Neale, a didenting Minifler : and (b there are in all the 
 Churches of theWorld. Ours hath not many things of this 
 Kind, nor lays great Strefs upon them : and to chink in* 
 if i^'rent Things unlawful, is as unreafonableaad as fuper- 
 iluious, as to think them neccflary. 
 
 He fpeaks with Horror of its enormous Hierarchy^ af- 
 fcendin^ by various Gradations from the Dirt to Sites t ■' 
 and rejemhling that of the Romiili Church, in which one 
 j^reat prelate frejides over the whole $. What he means 
 by the former Words, belides indeterminate Abufe, per- 
 haps he could Jiot cafify explain. That there are diffe- 
 rent Ranks of Med in civil Govemnient, was never held 
 Co be an Objcftlon agaiuit it : ;ij]d where is the Harm of 
 it in EccleGadical ? In the Presbyterian Hierarchy, one 
 is raifed conGderably above another^ though the Preference 
 uraally may be temporary : and tlieir A^s of Tower have 
 been as enormous, as thofc of the Englijh Btlhops former- 
 ly ; andiire much greater than thofe of the Englijh Bilhops 
 now. In his favourite Compsrifoo of our Church to the 
 Romijhf the Doftor quite mil!akes the Matter. Not one, 
 but two Prelates, prefides. over the Church of England ; 
 and four over her SKler Church of Ireland : which grie- 
 
 voui]y 
 t Pag. 1^6. • p. 127. X P '5$. J p. ^7. ' 
 
 4 
 
 t 
 
 4v 
 
|v 
 
 I 
 
 An Aiftxm fo Dr. Ma YHEw'j Ob/ervatiom, s 
 
 voufly CfOAh the Similitude, thtt he would make out. And 
 all thefe frefiie in SubordwatUn to the kinji^ at he well 
 knows ; tnoush he dKingenuouHy hints a Doubt of it by 
 his ironical Words, I hope* \ ac the fame time that, I be- 
 lieve^ he would deny it to be in Subordination to the King, 
 that He prcfides over the Weft Church in Bofton. As to 
 the 'Dirt, which he mentions : If fome Clergymen of our 
 Church are very low in the World, fb arc fome of every 
 Church ; nor do they deferve Scorn for it, but CompafTion. 
 And that any of ours are to high, as to do Harm, or 
 caufe Fear, by their Elevation, the Pcrfbns. amongfl whom 
 they live, find^not : and he, who is placed lb remote from 
 them, had better judge by the Experience of others, than 
 by his own heated Imaginaiion. 
 
 Bifhops, in his Language, arc the mitred lordly Succe/^ 
 fori cf the Fijkermen ^ Galilee §. Now if Mitres offend 
 him, our Bifhops wear none. If they are ftiled Lords, ir is 
 becaufe, by the ancient Conftitution of our Country, they 
 fit in the upper Houfe of Parliament : where. 1 believe, 
 they arc thought as ufeful Members as the rcf!. And I 
 know not, whether the Doftor's Modefty would propofc, 
 that our Conftijuiion fhould be altered in this refpcft, or 
 whetlier a much wifer Man could forefeetheConfeqaences 
 of fuch an Alteration. Men may be Lords, without being 
 lordly : and they, who have profeffed to abhor the Nime, 
 have carried the DKbofitionof domineering to the Height; 
 and lorded it over tie Confciences and the Liberrits of 
 others, as much as any who have worn higher Titles. 
 "What Intimation lies concealed under the Terms Fifker* 
 menof Galilee ; and whethf r, in the Do£lor*s Opinion, all 
 ^'liniflcrs of Chrift are to follow (brae Traoe, he hath not 
 explained, nor told us what his own i& But certainly 
 reviling his Brethren is a very bad one. 
 
 He alio charges the Church of England mxh Perfccntion; 
 and particularly with driving outtheAnceflorsof theprefent 
 Inhabitants of New*Kngknd into that Country f , Now it 
 !8 a Matter of Notoriety, that theLawfulncfsofPcifecurion 
 is no Doctrine of our Church : and there are few of its 
 jMembers, if any^ now, who approve it, or do not deteft 
 it. But we mud acknowledge, that, when the Errors of 
 
 * the 
 
 • Pag. 6ar. § p. 138. 
 
 t P 129. 
 
»h 
 
 4 jfn Atifwer to Dr. M A ff E w'/ Ql^fermfoifs. 
 
 theChurfih pf J^mi were C9(l cC thw wai npf HUfne^li^t^ 
 ly perceived to be oims by ^Imoft ^y of cbo Proti^finit 
 Cpmmuuions. Xbe Church of Ermtand wrs bv^t li)^^ 
 pthers ; and the Did^m^rs from ic haq npc the Xs^Si P^rep 
 more of a tolerating Spirit, perhaps not ^ fpuph. There 
 were amongft them peaceably Men, and (b there were a^ 
 mongft us. But in general their avow'd Aim was, npt 
 ]£xemption for themielves, but the DeftruQion of the Ec« 
 defiadical Eftablifhment ^. On this they were treated - 
 too feverely, and they returned the Treatment to the full, 
 as foon as they were able, in the total Overthrow of Church 
 ^nd State. Far from exaggerating, I chuft iK>t to finention 
 the Particulars of their Behaviour. Evesv good Man muft 
 lament the Faults of both Sides ; but to inveish againft 
 one with Bitternefs, and leave it to be imagined that the 
 pther was innocent, which the DoAor doth, 1 hope h^ will 
 ftt on Recollection is extremely unju(l. 
 
 In the Platform ofD'tfiifUne, agreed upon uf the Synod 
 4^Cambridge i;t New-England, in i<$48, and publifheq by 
 Air. NeaU^ in his Hidory of that Country, it » declared, 
 that Herejy is to be reftrained andfuntjhed by the Ctvi/Mt' 
 gijlrate ; and that if any Churches grow fchijmaticah or 
 walk contrary to the Rule of the fFbrd, he is to fut forth bis 
 coercive Power, as the Matter fball re^uiret* Accordingly 
 "Mr.Neale himfelf very honedly confefles, that theChurches 
 <?/" New- England, were formerly very uncharitable to thofi 
 who differed from them, and had no Notions of Liberty of 
 Confcience, but were for forcing Men to their public .AJfemr 
 bites by Fines and Imprifinments* + On their putting |o 
 Death fcveral Quakers, as they did before and after the ^ 
 Restoration » tlH an Order from King Charles the Second . 
 prohibiited them §, he hath thefe Words : New it appeared, 
 that the New England Puritans were no beUer Frtends ta 
 Z>iber!y of Confcience^ than their jidverfaries ; and that the 
 'Queflion between them W0S ngt, whether one Party ofChri- 
 ft tans fhould bpprefs another J>ut who fhouldhave that Power, ^ 
 JMay, the Quakers affirm, that they tt^bo had loudly cried out 
 
 * See this fully proved in Mtddox't Vindicatioa of the Church tf 
 
 England. 
 
 \ Vo\ II p 306 t Vfl. ir p. 148, 249. § Vol.1, p 3J4' 
 II Ibidi p. 329. , 
 
 i\ 
 
AnAnfwi^ toDf.MA'f h bw'/ Ob/ervaii6ns. j 
 
 •f the Tyranny gni Optriffion oftbi Bljhops in Old En« 
 glands frem 4vbotn tkeyfiid, when fettled in a Place, where 
 they had Libiriy to gevern, made their little Finger ofCry' 
 eltf bigger t Ihart ever they found the Loins of the Bi/hofi.^ 
 Dr. Nuyhew indtf^ iaith^ that Stoerities were ufed againjt 
 theQyaUn, Muih left under the Notion of their being'Dif' 
 fenters from //(^publick Mode ofJVorlhif, than of thei^ 
 bein^ Dijhtr^ers cf the Peace and religious ^J/^mblies\, 
 But (till Seyeririef were ufed tgainft them on the farmer 
 Accouhc ; and rhey jodly obfe^Vd iii Mr. Neale, chat 
 0§hottg ci chf) latter Kind have never been thought wohhy 
 of Death by any civilized Nation t» But the DoAor a(ks» 
 Aiptwfing the N^w Englonders to have perfecuted the 
 Quaktfrs^ From whom did they learn this Practice f Efifco* 
 fdliitm certainly fhould lay their Hands upon their Mouths §. 
 Now the plain Truth is, that all ProteOants learnt thii 
 Fra£Eice from the Church of JRomf^ ind all Ihould lay their 
 Hands upon their Mouths. But the Doflor hath no Right 
 toopehhisaswide ashe pl^fes, and require us to fhut 
 ours. 
 
 t Qod. be thanh^, the Memb^i^sof our Church ar^ gtbwti 
 wifei^ and niilder ; the Difl^nters in general, lam fuUf 
 perruaded>are(btoo.* tod it ishi^ Tim^, chat fuch oT 
 cx>th iWiieSi as are not, (hould. But Perfdrniinccs, lik6 
 the Do^hn^s, catinot furely coiltribut« to this good End t^ 
 mongft <^ith^« Heikfl&res us indeed it the Beginning, 
 that he hvStiz Regard to Truth andjuftici,^\i\i an jiver* 
 fion to Co/ftrover^ f ; and at the End, that he honours 
 aandidand moderate Men of all T)tnominations, and would 
 not iihfiecej^rily give Offence to any Per fin of the Eptfcopal 
 Perfuaftdn\, One muft fuppofe, that he believes himfelf ; 
 arid as far as is pofTible, 1 would believe him alfo. Some 
 Perfbns are ftrangely TubjeA to fudden Guds of Palfionl 
 and iay and do Things in them, for which they are hcardly 
 forry die next Hour. But were this the Doftor's Cafe in 
 writing, he would blot out the injurious EimreiTions which 
 had dropt from his Pen. Therefore his Malady hath a 
 deeper Root in his Frame, and influences him more con- 
 ilantly, though if may be without his perceiving it. For 
 
 I 
 
 ,f Cr^ntt IVeftc^ tP Bi/hffl'% NrvyStiniand In^fjiA. t p 79- 
 :t: Vol. I. p. 331, 332. § p. «•. f p. 7- I P Ml- 
 
8 j4n j4nfwer to Dk M a y h k w'/ Obfervaiions. 
 
 r 
 
 lam excccdintly unwiiJing co think, thtt he infcris hit 
 <]uaiifying ami healing Ciaufes with an artful Defigi to pro« 
 cure himlelf a Difpenraiion for Kis Outraget. However 
 that be, his ProFelGons.thar he doth not intend to do what 
 he hath been doing juA before, und doth again (bon after 
 with all his Might, are ProteHations againii Fa6^, which 
 cannot be admitted. 
 «* ,but whatever Concediuns a Gentleman of this Turn 
 
 • 
 
 makes. taliis Adversaries, are to received with greatRegard, 
 for any may be (urc they are not too larae. Let ut 
 ^lercfore begin with thefe, in confidering his Remarks ^on ' 
 the Charter and Conduct of the Society. • > ^ 
 
 . He owns, that // h<ttb a Right to -flant Ckutcbes, tofupm 
 port Mrffions and Schools y^c, in many of iheBnt'v^G^ Ameri- 
 can Cotonits ; and adds, that no one, who hath evir rtad the 
 Charter t can poffibly imaginf, . that its Care and Charity 
 ought to he confined to the Heathen Slaves in, or the Sava^ 
 ges bordering on, the Plantations ^, Yet many have been 
 Ted bqtb toUiisagine and to adert ihis,merely from itsName. 
 Jt is hoped, that for the future they will confefs and re- 
 . piember their Miftake. Htfowns iikewiftychat in three 
 pidri^s of New England, i, e. New Hampfhire, 
 'Hhode-Ifland fftd Provldeince, much lefi Care hath been 
 taken for the Support of a publick H^or/bip,\h%n in the 
 reft f : and that a few Miffions from the l^iecy might be 
 needed in thole, particularly in Khode^lflandX, And he 
 blames them as imnecefliiry, only \nthe Maffacbujetts and 
 ConneBicui, Nay, he declarae, that in theie // is by no 
 means his Intention to ^bargt that venerable Body with any. 
 *wilful known Mifiondu^^ or improper ^Application of Mo*. 
 nies, even though (^ny incautious EMprefflm JhouU at firjl 
 View have the jipfpttanceoffuch an \Accttfation §. Agaia 
 he faith, I would by no means be underftoody as charging /b 
 refpeSiahie a Body svith any wijfkl crimiwi Mufe ^f 
 J^ower |. Accprdingiy, after <IecJaring hit 7>efignio fhew 
 that they have infome refpfCls counteraSfed the Rnds of 
 their Jnftitution, he adds, hcu'ever contrary So ihgir Intent 
 tion^. JHc-haih alfothefee/^^reis Words : That tbg $9^ 
 ciety have chiefly fent their Miffionaties mto ibpfi BritiilaL 
 
 Plantations^ 
 * P;«. 12, 13. t V 3'6- X f 46. ; i p. 7^ i\f fj. 
 
 4\ 
 
 ■ 
 
 f 
 
 V 
 
ons, 
 
 rts hit 
 topro- 
 
 o what 
 
 n after 
 
 which 
 
 Turn 
 Regard, 
 Let ut 
 rks ^on 
 
 tofupm 
 
 ^meri- 
 tad the 
 Iharity 
 Savtt' 
 e been 
 Name, 
 nd re- 
 three 
 p(hire» 
 b been 
 in the 
 gbt be 
 nd he 
 'ts and 
 by no 
 ub any. 
 
 rMo^ 
 
 Agaia 
 lingfo 
 fe af 
 7 fhew, 
 nds of 
 Inttn^ 
 be S9^ 
 
 4\ 
 
 w 
 
 aU&nSy 
 
 \P'f3' 
 
 Phmafiohs^here'fhey w^renvtch fteedeU,aA^A)^tVt1k(>Ut 
 Ih/igff iff their ffijftfutf^ ; an^ fhtii itfty 6ms btNb^fi^t^ 
 the mirejj (fReiigioh in tf^n^hbymifieani dehied : n inHf^ 
 viry cH^ihiiil to (hiy fheih the Frdiil\ that is juftb iiti'ib 
 thm m this Refped. 1 honour t\A Dbaof ft)r tfc«te l\^ 
 ftiiiccfe bf Gandol- ; and if he hid prcfehYcd th* filinb1|^^ 
 ftt- throughout, (hould cith^ havd had hb CdmiMi^HV 
 with Mm, or haVe engaced in the frifchdif Debttt^^ Wkw 
 t^i^afbrc : Whereat now the fVcqa^c and copibus lOSVifdittt 
 ^^a badSt^rit in his WoHc make (v^h A^rtii^tHioftts liftoti 
 \\\^ unavoidable, as I %idiM otheflK'ii^ gladly hitb fjAit^; 
 Hts Chni'gc ^tl th^ S^ci^ty is, that they have 'maintaimf 
 Epffc^pdl Ghf/rches, where other Prvheflant dhttrebifJ ^^ 
 hjbn piled, and the Athninijlratihn of God's WhrU itnif 
 Qrd^dfices prwi<redfir,\\ with i formtilDefm which thej^ 
 hnk^e ^g hnd, to ro<^ out Prd^byterianifm, ifc, from 'th€ 
 Q>kmies, NbW this t)di(5iti, infurfiianei otwhiehj he faith, 
 thty haifehiH ^r^tiiMeafur'eneglededthe Ends ef their Irfffi' 
 tHfron,^ is falVeJjr afcribed to thcrti. iTifcy have hevei? 
 formed a Sqheme to root out Prefbytcrianifm, ^c, m. ^M 
 Goldnics, either by Fbrce, whicti the Doftbr cbttM not 
 faeHWi though the Word ttiofl: rtatiwtly fiiggcfts it, or t^ek 
 by Argiiinehe and Per/uafibn. Uiidoubt^ly they would 
 be v^rjr glad, if all th^ Ifihabirdnts were oJFth* Cofnitmhioii , 
 ^the Chufch d? Enghhd: as tindoubtfedlt thfe Ddftbf 
 ^feilld, if they \^erc all bf his Gofmnilriibn, Btit thdjr hiiVe 
 feht ho ^ferfohs to efft:6t this. He atteriipts tb pro^ the 
 tiftkrirf from the folloi^lng inftrtiftioh, ^veh bf ttldfti to 
 their MilTiotTbries : fhdf (hey frequently vift Mr yegtifi" 
 the Pdr't/hioHers ; tfyoji ^ oh'f' tUvH Oommitnibn, to i^ ihhii 
 phdf in the Prtfmntind'Frdaide of keligiim, a} MWJ^ 
 ii^ tfie Cf^urch tf Eftglatid ; th^'fhist o^fe us.orm'^ 
 ftofn iis, U cdfhihce aAd rklaiffi ibem with a iptrtiofMi 
 nefs itMQmiinefsl\ His Words on Mi Gecifibri k^6V 
 This cleu^)- flf^hvi, ixsikt they a^ tft^Y, ft nvtft- dffom 
 O^^rkMf^^i ihdi WlL m eonftd^Hd as Fdrt/BtoHeH of We 
 Mjimdrres, ito left ihdk fr}ifep3 Efifcefdlidhs. Md iffP 
 ' - ' -B • . tf^' 
 
 ' if' *J- *" Pag' 86. t Collc^lioDof Papcw, prI»U(J l?y Prdei of 
 t^e Society, jp. 24» 
 

 to. j4tt Anfwtr to Dr, May HE-w^sOi/irvaimf, 
 
 I \ 
 
 {lru£tion plainly relates, not toMiifionaries fettled in P^ 
 bjtman or congregational Partihes, for there, wei^e none fo 
 iettl^^d when it was dtawn up, but for Incumbents of epif- 
 copal Parifhes, though with a Mixture of DiiTdnters. And 
 they would of courfe underfland, that endeavouring to con' 
 vince and reclaim the latter wag not to be their /lated and 
 principal Bufinefs, but occalional only and incidental, vlf 
 the Do^iior (hould happen to fpcak of the Epifcopaliaas re* 
 Tiding in his Pariih, as Part of his Patiihioners, and fay, 
 that he (Iiould endeavour to reclaim t hern with a Spirit of 
 Meeknefs ; would this be a Proof, that he was fixed there 
 with z formal Deftgn to root out Efnfcopacy in it ? If t^iere 
 be Initances, in which MifEonaries, who have no 1^1 Pa^ 
 riihesy have ufed the fame Language ; (for he quotes nonc^ 
 and I remember none) it only follows, that they have ex* 
 prefled themfelves improperly, and 0iould be fet righ^ whep 
 it is obferved. 
 
 -5^ Another Evidence produced by the Doftor is, that irith^ 
 Aumnt of the Society ^ publifbed in 1 706, after Jpeaiim ^ 
 the independent Congregations in Nev/ England, theyjay^ 
 •* Several other Ways of Divijion and Separation Sdfbmuch 
 ** obtain in other of our Colonies ^ Plantations, that this madf 
 ^ it more necejpiry to think of providing for a regular and 
 
 *^ orthodox Minifiry^ to promote^ as much as poffibk, 0n 
 
 ** agreement in Faith andWorJhip?^ This^ he Saith, can 
 ffiean nothing, more or lefs, than Uniformity, or a general 
 Conformity to the DoSlrine, Difcipliue and Worfhip of the 
 Church of England.* I have not been aWe to procure this 
 discount, or to learn by whom, or whofe Order, it was com- 
 piled. But the Paflage quoted from it, exprefly fpeaks, 
 not of independent, or any Gragregations in New England^ 
 but of other Ways of Divifton and Separation in other Cobh 
 nies, and therefore is nothing to the Doftor's Purpofe : be- 
 lidcs that, as much Agreement as pojible, in Faith and Wor^ 
 Jbip might be far lefs than a general Conformity to the 
 
 , Church 
 
 iPa^.£9. 'p. 86, ^7* 
 
 . 1 
 
 »,^ 
 
 

 i 
 
 
 Ai^ Mnfvurta Dn Ma yheV/ Objcrvaiioi^> i i * 
 
 '•■'-■'.. . ' ' , ' 
 
 Churfb afSuj^tmd ; which it might be impoffible to obtain*, ' 
 and jm aiQdnr-an Approach to it as could be obtained, 
 nn^lt^ eten k his opinion, be more deiirable, than lettbg - 
 them contiil^e in their prefent Way. For how bad that, 
 wa^app^ursinotf^ 
 
 ' ^Thc rTTrQil Conduct of the Society, with rcfpeft to Pro- 
 vinces aiicl Biriihes not epifcopal, hath been, to contribote 
 
 , towards ^ftipportii^ publick WorlHip and Infthi^on a^ 
 mongft fuch Members of the Church of Eng/and, as cannot 
 
 . ii^ Confcience comply with the WoHhip and Indrudion of 
 the other Congregations in their Neighbourhood, ^ndyet^ 
 cannot wholly .maintain Minifters for themfelves. The 
 moil of thefe will ufually be in the mofl confiderable 
 Towns ; and for that Reafon it is, and not with a View of 
 making Converts, as the Do^or pretends,^ that epifcopal 
 
 ' Miniilers are fcttfed in fo many confiderable Towns* of 
 New England, But they are fettled no where, till a com* 
 petent l^timber c^ our reople inhabiting near, requeft it, 
 and fubfcTtbe what they are able. Nay, thefe Requefts * 
 Have often, both formerly f and lately, been rejefted, or 
 poflponed for many Years together, when the Number did 
 not appear to be fufficient, or the Society apprehended, . 
 that too much of their Money was going this Way. And 
 Were it but known, as it feems to be in fome Meafure'to the . 
 Diflenters themfelves, { how continual and importunate the 
 Calls and Expoflulations of fuch Perfons are, the Impartial 
 would wonder, how the Society could withfl^d fo many of 
 them, as it hath done; Thefe are plain Evidences, that 
 MifHonaries are not fent to New England for the Purpofc; 
 of making Profelytes to Epifcopacy. Accordingly, which • 
 is a funher Evidence, they have no Dire^ons, publick or 
 private, given them to make any, or to preach at all upon ' 
 difputable Points: but on the contrary, one Rtde laid 
 down for them is, that they keep always in View tbepreaf 
 Defign of their Undirtakif^,\iz, to promote theCloryrfGod, 
 ana the Salvation (f Men, by propagating the Gq^iofour 
 Lord and Saviour ; || and anomer is, that the chief Sufy'e^ 
 
 Ba of 
 
 , 'P Pag. 46. t See Humphjt^s hiftorica! Account, p. 61, &c. 
 X See Mr. Hobart\ fcrious Addreic, p. 1 3 3. 1 ^8. fj CoUeftioQ 
 . ff PaperK, p, 20. 
 
 «' 
 
 :A- 
 
1? -^-(^f4f*P«!M>^WiK^'' <^W^^ 
 
 J?o^ cap .^Mjf on»i^ eg^lY ^iiRffBPllf»***^«WI-^' 
 dons of the Society, thus manifefted. S^^rat 9$ tj|^9t»^ 
 haj^ in4epd. ipi^Ke^ highfe^ S38^f^ie% pgffelp^ ^ fe tltit 
 
 %e ijBumf^ODed i^ mh »^tf?m\^r» in< ideir ht»&i^ 9fli 
 t^4g)f which tfeiy %yft:WM:tiPI Wnflf^Q^^ 93»r«f-k4 
 
 t^lPerfoQs, whj? p£ t¥$ir <»«R> Acc^^i frar» Ciwdofay' or 
 oUscr M9tives,^^^4fi4 ifh ©r if ihryHOW ^d thca do- 
 jiii^n^,tl>€in|l^ asiR^kJr^ CQ»¥$r^ t)i<iy dfo nQ^ecexf 
 t9 the h^ of 9iy Rein^at>ni9jQi& meaitiod: ;hi9^ «i th^ Eoi' 
 fof whicjj ^^ were ^p^m;^ Di^. ^^bnfdn^ ope of t^ 
 ofoefl, <^ t^eia^ ^o(e^ i^ .t|0$ ^ ^e fp^ iji theie Words 7 
 
 ^«r cktefjind frqh4 Buftn^i, k^ frfifitijitc BlfsnUrs tax tht 
 
 S^rfjb^ if E^^dX^-'-Qur cj^^, bujtne/s />, P6 niniftifr to^ 
 ^v^qre^ Chfircb Beppki a^if ti)is pmves theiOccd* 
 
 A'^^^i^^'^^J'^S ^ ■W)^^'^ «X *^ W what maynat^alfy 
 Si e3i^jsi\e4i, wmn tfyiy, by_ i/foi m^nst hsvt Opfortumty h 
 /%WV^^. /;^ Mv^ntagf ifo/kour Side.\ And^Mr. 
 Be/ub^ 9j^i^ almofl; i| np^ qi|ice> as o!d« faith, Uis not tb^ 
 J?6&* ^^hf Cbnrt^r* tbal tMSockty JhouldfiiidMiJ^on- 
 Of^s tffi ^o^an P<e^by ^erjans /« tM Cburcb. : ofid^t is a 
 iij/Jt^JSg^/^ tafayJb8y.d(k'r''Tkey mvfir.ftnd\MJjhnme4 
 /(3L c^9^rt Mrotefi^nts t^t^ Qhutchi(fr^io^vidLi bid tommi* 
 Jfyr t(^fib^rcb'Mei^ii: ^ndi/IXfJ/sntfrs by (hab means are^ 
 iMa^.t^tfi^Cfmrdj^ ff3$y^ 49< iV)ti tiipkf by this any Ei>ih 
 m^. %Hi k tb^Tmtin ^fda/liife Truth.^: Accdirdmgi^ 
 JI^L ''^§1^;^ e4»!Sta>l.e JVftSoamy : tifes. the fdiowing WDr<j^ 
 i%a 5apef i^ pwed^ wWeftl l|»ye fcen. , *f ^ Meime very> 
 
 « Jjm- 
 
 f Colfeftlonof i»3pcrs, p. 63. \ %f. to Mr. fi<»4^A#*s Vindicaiioil, 
 
 ♦^11 
 
are- 
 
 K* 
 
 cells us he is faid to have done, that he dejires. n0 (» m0i0i 
 
 m S^i^fim th0. i9^g^^'^m4 Ghmi^f TFte Di^«»or 
 I^pr to tM S(ifi0tyt ^fukufn 4((;^^m^ i^kipQgf^tMgimm 
 
 ojftky a Qi^qr qf SQ9»imen|9 i» Pei^s^^Q^Qfhitir 9<t%»* 
 iioas» without »to^4^AJr/j?^iot^ci^ .^ Tll»rDQftor«¥ilj» 
 iV^ <^ ttfiMFiUifiS i!^ p9rc!i»!«e. h olwQm s^ Sktiuiiooi etoti- 
 t^ bel^ kiidr ^ comqe offi bjf ikpip0^^ ^t f^k^r kk 
 
 }lfmmk/uch 4^J$om :■ ^i«g,^ wk ^kich 'h0r hjf^ 
 4q b^m^ bejirk noka^ Huiet d^fa^nt^. But hatll JAr^ . 
 
 cir tji^ CollfgjB i K BQt, wby^ is. » ppflt l^oilfeife^ 
 ^^iQ%^(br)M> tahtor;. and a.^ Di^^poifttmea^ Aii^mM 
 e^ Uppcss^^whkK fee <}plh iiRt: appjtai? (0 have«(tH«mlutti<?^ 
 '\^h^ Opo^ not, hi^Dec^tia% an^^iJiital^le Seh^iom iifi 
 rai^^i^ dSfc^irad anotbefi pFPQf» tliAt the; MiCuinarifl^ HMbtSt 
 ftMi^i *«^^ftlfcl!Bfct<f^fc!e^ not Eif^%^'««;lMfl»«efV W> 
 o^^ii^i9g to^ our 09^. PeGfilc .^ Thi9' I>o^ bfKciNit' Niii'i 
 dgodi wliti ma]f, fc#n> Oc Prefiijnptui^of th^ tlWIipary^ ^him 
 fi(tfx^.ti,nlS^rruUG^ m th&Teimof C|f»bndge #iiSy 4#v 
 t^tlf^Sff^cefofthtiCfjtir^hi^f^jii/e^t^.t^ $m"m 
 
 M»$ riq^r^feQted to th.^ 2^1^^ tl:ia$ 5io SKdilktiflliiiag, 
 %QWSs^: aftd, l^ghl^jujrfipqi wcr«i' drfw» I61 9tfieiA'ife: 
 AM'ihot^id tfe^ prove much^ fewrecv )fet f^<f»K]ybmlMitt 
 cfxi^ CJhuflch of l^fund fenci thgif Chiktewjlo |fo¥i«n£ft 
 C6l}^e tbi^^:. ^. ^eh a Piaec^ of Wordlj^ ai^ tb^-iMMb 
 tti^ I^ei^ ^mf^ m^f bo t»ifaiiaJHjv;r pfq(iiiilf4 kt 
 tberii wjfiiout any» E^fig^ of pDoMjnitig' othMi !£b9ii^ 
 
 I|^ hadi^ 1^0(91, fin^dr &r g{OJ»g CQibw bk om l^tiiofvl 
 
 I 
 
 t jj^^flijiff aicf^t^ mf^ i7i», J. 63. *^.;#. 
 
 9n 
 
it 
 
 14^ An'Anfwer /o Dr. MArHEw'/ Ob/ervatioHs. 
 
 an cpifeo^ Mitufter, preach. . But in Harvih^ OoXiej^c, 
 itfeems,. a better Spirit prevails : and it is more likely to 
 ^rifli, both for that Moderation, and for the new Giiilth 
 built near it. 
 
 The DoAor faith, that in fome other Places the Suppli' 
 emits for Millionaries have not exceeded % or 16, or ii 
 Heads. of Families.j; But if this be true, they have peti* * 
 tidned in the Nai^e of others, as "well as their own. And 
 fuppofiiig the Society to have been mifinfonned about their' 
 Ntiimbers, this may happen notwithfbnding good Care; 
 and by no means proves them to have a D^gn, which * 
 other Circumflances proves they have not 
 
 But the Doctor apprehends, that whatever theNuff^j^,^ 
 of thefe Petitioners any where may be, Conicic^e is biiF 
 feldom their Motive, and therefore they Should not b^ 
 encouraged. Indeed, he fcarccly feems to conceive how- 
 it can be their Motive ; and wants to be told, ^u^at there it\ 
 that Jhould give Offence to good Protefiofits J in the Presby- 
 terian or congregational Churches. We muft not call rhe^iy. 
 ^dependent, for he faith the Epifcopalians dffe£t tt^re^^pt- 
 them under that Name : || though Mr. Ne/^,'l^iSii£'^n 
 Ibdependent, ufes it frequency, smdkisridiwtp^ 
 not' reproachful at all Nor mud we call th^n Anemblies 
 cir Communions ; for he hath rebuked Mr. Afthprfitid thef ^ 
 Archbiihop of Canterbury for doing it,* though he 3oifr it '^ 
 hteifelf. In thefe Churches therefore, he watxf;^ fa kjoow 
 what there is that ca?^ give Offence : and fo ktSL jtefctf 
 attain into his darling Topick, of abufing the "Qiiikch of 
 £iiffAi«rf in Gompariibn. However, he irecollefts'that he^ 
 h&m heard foihe Epifcopalians fay, and been told that others 
 have^faid, that they Jhouid much prefer the Communion tf the 
 Gkurch of Kotos, f to that of the Diifcnters. And Indee4 
 none are fo likely as he, and fuch as he, to provoke thofe' 
 into faying it, who would think very differently in their 
 coder-Hours. But fuppofmg this to be their fettled Juc^-^ 
 mtnt ; would he have them left to turn Papifls, If they 
 ^ill, bccaufe they are not fo good'Proteftants as they fiioidd 
 be ? The Church of Rome and it? Society de frofaganda^- 
 iq woqld 
 
 . tPag. 4S. P^ 66. I p. 36. * p. 67. flbl * 
 
 -:/J^ 
 
 -,/<-,»' 
 
 m 
 

 4 
 
 An Anfwer t0 Dr. Mayhevt's Obfervaiwns. 15 
 
 woald have ground to thank him for eflablifhing this No* 
 tion. But if fome of bis own Communion ihouid fay ;|tet 
 they had rather be Anabaptifts or Q^ers than GiuKdr 
 men, would that be a Rcafon why they fiiould have no 
 Miniiler of his Communion amongft them ? I (hould imar 
 giiie jufl the contrary. Perfons ci different Parties in fi«^, 
 ligion may think too III of each other, without wifhinglH 
 to each other at all ; and fo may mean very well, though 
 they judge greatly amifs. Or even if they mean 111, they 
 have fo much the more Need of fuch Inftrufiors as they 
 edeem to fet them right. 
 
 But the Doctor, M do the Epifcqxilians ^uftue, doth not 
 Juppofe that thtfe Senrifnenfs generally prevail among them. 
 And he admits that fome af them may pojfibly^ without going' 
 theje Lengths, have confcientious Scruples about the Means ^^ 
 Religion in his Communion* But he puts the word poj/tbly 
 in Italicks : which intimates, that he thinks it barely poiFi- 
 ble. And this PofTibility he extends no further, in what 
 follows, than to allow d[itrtm2iyht fome Things or Circum^ 
 Jlancgs which i hey cannot entirely acquiefce in, or approve of 
 Now would he,^count us to be mfEciently charitable, if 
 we conceded only fuch a Poffibility of Confcientioufnefs to 
 the Diflenters from the Church of England? If not^ why 
 is he fo extrenjely fparing in his Conceflions to us ? W^ 
 hold it to be probable, we hold it to be evident, that many 
 DiiTenters who are far from thinking us worfe than Papifli^ 
 yet cannot in Confcience ufe the Means of Religion in Otts 
 Communion. And furely we are intitled to as favourable; 
 an Opinion from them. Without maintaining that./^ 
 have no Gofpel Minijlers^ or Sacraments, or Ordinances^ or[ 
 Churches,^ we may apprehend, whether rightly or wrongjy 
 is not to be difputed now, but fmcerely however^ that £pi^ 
 co^cy is of Apoftolical Inftitution, and that Scripture af- 
 foras as good Proof of this, as .of the Appointment of In- 
 fant Baptilm and the. Lord's Day.. We may apprehend 
 that, after ihe ceafmg of extraordinary fpi ritual Gi£q|^ 
 Forms. pt Prayer were always ufed, more or kf§, rhroughoiit 
 jhc Churcii of Chrift, and arc Dceiiful for the Obfervance 
 
 ■'■■•■■'- 4 
 
MW^ fM« mt hiktflir thi^j9M^/(^f\\) ^ 1M^ jtxige 
 N^tikftfWfVri ib^ u6 to k^ ill tM HcjieAbn ^ ekhei-. J^fljf 
 HIM ir6 t^I)r tb tMRk €h(»r MMmy^ «Mptitiei \tith <IM 
 Of^ilr €lHifth,«d lie tiitedii^^rani ittdkt tbn «tir PkA 
 hr {Mfahring a SejiftNKidil fl*oi^ thtili^ \w 4oilM t>ttc IqU 
 fti# the jtoeiti "Wfifdt twfi^^f tkd J^c/f DitfditdR 
 hkMe te. 
 
 The DbaxM* ifMle^ ^nl V^y Mc^m t^fdCi^M^ <M 
 die Non-compliance of our Ptoele : AiN^jS F^ltUmt^ 
 moHtt^ grmMfi Biftufi al At fik$StiMk^^ mf- 
 JtHifaMm shut iWr MkRam^ dt 4t king iMiti ^ 
 
 fc ^ Mt ajfim ptfiiiv^ $hat Hi$e9^{h^ ttieum Utrji} ff 
 niii^ bafb ahtktp beeh Ik C^ft iHithuf Bfctfim *. 
 Mm again he is remarkably cardFuK rhst hi^ Qmce0H>tfli 
 m the pcK)tEpirco]^!tans (hall not 4jetiMy ^tA. Aikd 
 0lceep on even Terms with hifh^ itt do not iimnih p^^ 
 ^&y that none ofthefeh^h e^ar been the Cafe. Btit ti^ 
 ihiiftinfifl; that the farodrable Prcfumptioif it the prefer 
 fiApjeone, and that Men^s P^dfeifion^ tottcenning theit 
 dirn Inducements, trt CO be credited, uniefs the contrary 
 i^art; which, acctyrdmg tp the bed Ihtelligenee th^ 
 co^d be got, we bdieve it hath not ordtnai'ity done, in 
 the Matter nb# under Conltderation. On ohe ttf thdt 
 Hi^^, /Ptntfhe^ theDodtoi* ekpiains himMf, by ftying^i 
 fiikt ttiU tji'ttf mi mii; iKilftf iht 6pi/ei9pdikiiti M 
 j^mhil^m^ RHtnitt t^i^ti^ btit fe^/i^ 
 
 ^pfm tf thirhm €krgy, Efftfeopaey madei^iit 
 tifmiB^i and chat if ihtyifi4 Mn eiempted frm afi 
 0^&ii^ taxes m the Sffifkii^iarii almdfi aU^bo Mei 
 itkir MifUf Mftr than iti^ TUfif ^, m^htin m 
 Pjurfi ofufi^Tnirf bMl oBcmd the Cmmnhn »/ M 
 wtBtebf. IBut what needed iSttt^ #hdio^ed thei^ Moh#i^ 
 Hfecer thalft any Thing ^e, tdrn £|)lfii6^1iaM to iWe It^ 
 #hen turning Queers wdtdd hsiire ferved the fante F^^ 
 {K»fe matt e£%natty? And haiva any Ef^eopairinj 
 
 turned 
 % X Cor, XIV. ze. jj Xiom. niv. 4, t ^p- 47. t p- 49. 
 

 Attd 
 
 prtfe* 
 f thdt 
 
 Hie, in 
 ' thdi 
 
 \n m 
 vt % 
 
 turned 
 
 1 
 
 An Anfwer to Dr. Ma y h e w / Olfirvtitionf 17 
 
 turned Quakers, when they found their former Change 
 would iecurc them no longer } If nor, this Si]g|^e(lkio J9 
 unauthorized and unwarnmtable* He declines giving 
 any receni Inftanea of Mens adding upon the Motived 
 «vhich he allcdges, bccanfe if you will believe bim tobe To 
 fender, o)done8,\given by another Perfon^ may be left 
 invidious. Of thcfe he produces two, from a Letter of - 
 Dr. Celman of BaJioHi written above 50 Years ago to 
 Dean, afterwards Bifliop iC^nfl//. And he obferv.es rigbt- 
 Jy, that the Dean in his anfwer exprefies his Belief thac 
 •they are true. Btit be plainly believed it only on the Lv 
 •formation of Dr. Colman^ a perfect Stranger to him % nor, 
 Tan any Inquiry into t4ie real Truth be made now. Ai^ 
 I beg Leave to obferve in my Turn, that according tp 
 Dr. Mayhew^%o^n Account, Ibr I have no other, the 
 ^Dettn thought the ^iety was authorized t9 plant fpifi^- 
 rpMlChuukes^ where, though there v/asafotiltdM^mJhyf 
 tikrC' ^»enz\kkgotdNtimktrSy who toidd not in .Can- 
 feienci ionftrm to the Ways ofJVorfiiip diffvrtnt frfiifi, tie 
 eflabUftiid Cbwd> 1^ England^. Therefore aflening, 
 -that the true and only Defignof the Society, in jei^ii^ 
 •Miflionariesto the MaffachuJHU and ConmStuutt haijb 
 ^always beet»^ co prolicide lor Aich Petfon^ is not^Oj&yv 
 >Pl«a, ie^vttp«o (^ve a Torn. The Dean had g^od Op- 
 portunities of knowing its real Purpofes ; and fo worthy 
 a Manas Dr. Af^^i^w aliowi him to be, wOuld nothave 
 ' written as he hath done, if he had fufpefbed any further 
 infidious Scheme. Indeed the Society, far irons having 
 ^fofioed a Pfoje6b to epifcopizc ( as the Do^or calls ^) 
 't\m Country, Imd but three Miffionaries In it {even 
 Y^rs affcer; and the following oOes went upon noipjthf^r 
 < Errand than the firft. 
 
 After faying that the abovemcntioncd Caufcs product 
 Fadionisand Parties, and they produced epifcopal Scp^- 
 rationsi the Doctor goes on to £iy, that divers «/ the 
 Mi§i9n$ries have hun much injured^ (which thcTf i^ P^ 
 IRmfinU fuppcfe) if they havi mt Jutti ^tm PH&Jn^^ 
 « t>; C fomenting 
 
 ••^£; 10^55. " '■ '^ " . :: t 
 
I 
 
 I 
 
 ■■¥ 
 
 iS j4n Anfwer to Dr. Mayhew'j Ohfervations. 
 
 fomenting thife BmJions\ yea^ been at the BotMm of 
 them f. But I take the Liberty of maintaining, that 
 there is great Reafbn to fuppofe they have been injured* 
 For in all fuch Difpuces it never fails, but each Side injures 
 the other; and the Miflionaries would be very fure of 
 having a double Load of Calumny thrown upon them. 
 Still, that feme of them may have been to blame in this 
 rfefpe^, is not only poflible, but, confidering human 
 Nature, too likely. And if any where it can be prqved 
 that they have been iujy Bodies in other Men's Matters^ 
 or ufed bad Arts to promote a good Caufe, they ought 
 to be reprimanded, and if they amend not, removed. 
 But the Doctor, confcious that Mifbehaviours of parti- 
 ticular Perfons would not come up to his Point, charges 
 the Society ttfelf with manifefiing a fufficient Forwardnejs 
 to encourage and inereafe jmall difaffe&ed Parties m 
 T'owns^ upon an Application to them. And this, he faith, 
 appears^. But how it appears, he bath not faid, nor 
 can I inoagine. ^ The Society hath never been made ac- 
 quainted with any of the little Quarrels in the Towns of 
 New England \ and were ttiey to know them, they are 
 cod remote to give Diredtons about them ; unlets the Dr. 
 call mfake it ap(edr^ that they have givien their MiHIionariiis 
 si general Dire£tion to inflame them all^ as much as they 
 can. 
 
 Perhaps he may think that no other Caufes can be sA- 
 ledged^ than fuch as he hath produced, for the Inereafe 
 of Epifcopaliansin thofe Paits. But this would be a great 
 Miftake: Though the firft Planters of New England 
 were Separatifls from our Church, many ConformilU to 
 it can^e afterwards to fettle there ; and fome of them, as 
 I am credibly informed, were to be found fifty Years agp» 
 in almqft every Town ijf confiderable Standing. Thefc 
 new Comers were defpifed and reproached for their reli- 
 gious Principles by their Neighbours ) mod: of whom had 
 been taught to*t)>ink cheChurch6f£ir^/^Mi nearly as bad 
 as the Church of i^^m^. Thus attacked, it was natural 
 . . - that 
 
 tp. 47. * I P*/. if . 15. _ t ^»|^47« 
 
itions. 
 
 '*m of 
 ;• that 
 
 njured* 
 
 injures 
 
 fure of 
 
 them. 
 
 in this 
 
 human 
 
 prqvcd 
 
 mrs\ 
 
 ought 
 
 noved. 
 
 parci- 
 
 charges 
 
 ardnejs 
 
 ^ies m 
 
 le faith, 
 
 }, nor 
 
 ade ac- 
 
 ^wns of 
 
 hey are 
 
 the Dr. 
 
 ionari^s 
 
 as they 
 
 1 be^- 
 ncreafe 
 a great 
 
 Dilh to 
 em, as 
 irs agp, 
 
 Thefe 
 iir rdi- 
 )mhad 
 
 as bad 
 
 natural 
 
 that 
 
 yin Anfwcr to Dr, M a y ii EwV Ob/ervatioits, i ^ 
 
 that they Ihould endeavour to defend themfelves; and 
 procure fuch Books as would enable them to do it better. 
 Some of the more candid and inquifitive among the 
 Pre/by terians and Congregationalifts adventured to hear 
 their Defences, and to read their Authors ; were convinr 
 ced by them, and became Churchmen. As their Numr 
 ber grew, it was natural that they (bould endeavour to 
 procure themfelves Minifters, and on their Rcqueft the 
 Society helped them. This occafiooed a fiirther Aug- 
 mentation, to which alfo contributed greatly the wild 
 EnthuOafm that prevail'd in feveral of the New England 
 Churches, even before Mr. /i^/&i/^^/</ came amongft them, 
 
 . but was mightily encreafcd by him and the ilroiling Tea-' 
 chers that followed him *, as did iikewife their extending 
 fpiritual Cenfurcs to mere Trifles, with their end left Con- 
 tendons and Confufions on the fettling of Minifters, and 
 on various Occurrences bclides -, all which Things difguft- 
 ed and wearied out many of their People, and induced 
 them to feek a peaceable Refuge in our Communion. If 
 thefe are known Pads, as I am al&red they are, they will 
 go a very great Way towards, accounting for the Growth 
 of the epifcopa) Party ; and the Dodor (hould not have 
 fuppreffed them, and aferlbed it wholly to fuch bad and 
 
 V fuch low Motives as he hath done, in order to throw an 
 Odium upon the Society, as encouraging what it abhors, 
 for the Attainment of a Defign which it never framed. 
 
 But the Do6lor fecms to intimate, that evenuppn Sup- 
 pcjition^ that the Epifcopalians in Ntvo Engiand, who 
 pleaded that they had no Minifter^ whom they could at- 
 tend, were eon/crentious People^ yet they were not much 
 to be pitied^ or redly OhjeSls of Charity* Surely he couhi 
 not mean this. At I'ealt, I (hould have great Compaflion 
 for a Number of Diflcnters in thfe fame Stare. ThuS much 
 however he allows, that //' any Per forts in England,!*;/ their 
 private Capafity^ fiiculd think it^ whicl^ again rather im- 
 plies that he in their Condition Ihould not think if, a Deed 
 
 , af Charity to fi^pport epif copal Churches in New England, 
 
 C 2 for 
 
 # Pag. 69. 
 
I 
 
 >r 
 
 
 i! 
 
 
 ^0 -^Ji Anfwer to Dr, M a V h £ w V Oh/irvutiCH^, 
 
 fir tbt Sake eftbofi eompsraiiveiy /rw e^Mfiitnthitj P^t 
 ^, ^0 whom the Meojls of Fieligion^ to be bad in the Pro* 
 nftant DiJ/entifig Commumens^ are no Means^^^tbey bave 
 a Rigbt to do it But he inflfts that the Society hath nor, 
 ibeir wboU Fund and Revenue being otberwife appropri* 
 ated i which he undertakes to prove fcom their Charter* 
 ' Now I acknowledge that the Cafe of the New England 
 -£pirco]jalians, is not particularly defcribed and provided for 
 m thei' harter. But fo neither is c heCafe of an y other /m&'^iifx, 
 than fi ch as are the King's SubjeSs^ and People living in bit 
 fiantations and Colonies^ fortothefeonly the Letter of the 
 Charter extends \ and in refpeft. of others^ Mr. Aptborp 
 might juftly fay, that Indian Converjeons are undirtakeM 
 by tbe Sotiety^ as it wire «x abundanti. Vet Dr. Maybew 
 is fo f;lr from blaming the Society for applyioi; Part oif 
 their Benefadions to the Indru^ion of fuch Indians as 
 only border on lus Maje(jby*s Duminions, that he blam^^ 
 them greatly for not applying more of it to that Ufci:^ 
 Now if their Cafe, which cxifted wh^n the Charter was 
 granted, and yet is not named in it, may however be 
 looked on as comprehended within its Inrentioi), and ob- 
 tain Relief by Means of it in Confequence of the generail 
 Principle on which it is founded, mucli more tmy that 
 of the £pifcopahans, which did not exid and was not 
 fbrefe^, arid therefore no Wonder it was not named. 
 Though it was not exprefsly mentioned before it was in 
 Being, ftii) if, when it came into being, it was included 
 under the Kea^n and Equity of the Purpofes which arie 
 exprefsly mentioned ; paying Regard to it muft be un- 
 derftood to be allowed >bv the Charter, and virtually di- 
 fcdted in it. Fo/ir the Rules of Law require that Grants 
 of Pr4nps, and parrjcularly Grants in Favour of ReKgion, 
 be interpreted as liberally as may be*. And thijs far, I 
 conceive, Mr. Aptborp^ rightly aflerts, that tbf Soeitlty 
 bave a difcretiopary Power of inakin^ Ahtrations in siHr 
 i^fiitutiin \ nor do 1 believe that he measit to carry it 
 
 ■ \- fiirehtr, 
 
 ♦ Sefc thofe Rules 'MiWcod^iIrfiifittej of civil Law, latrod.c. 13. 
 Sea. 3, N® 13, 17. ' , V •>'''.'■■ 
 
 ■7. . ' 
 
 
fePro* 
 
 iybsvt 
 ch not, 
 propria 
 hjtrter* 
 Mgland 
 dedfor 
 
 I in Hi 
 •of the 
 ^ptborf 
 makeM 
 faybew 
 Partcf 
 ^ans as 
 
 [er was 
 iver he 
 fnd ob- 
 generail 
 ay that 
 vas not 
 naiticd. 
 was m 
 ipluded 
 lich arie 
 be un- 
 aliy di- 
 Grams 
 eKgion, 
 s far, I 
 Sodtty 
 in thMr 
 carry it 
 FurcW* 
 )d.c. 13. 
 
 ^«Anfwcrio Dr.l/ih^H^Ws Qljfirvatkm. 21 
 
 furthec* however unmercifully Dr. M^ybiw batb trcate4 
 him t on the Suppofiuon that he did. ^ 
 
 If it be doubted, notwithftanding the abovementionedi 
 Argument it fortiori^ whether the Cafe of the New Eng* 
 land Epifcopalians Comes within the Charter or not, 1 brg 
 the Reader^s Attention to the following additional Con- 
 (iderations. The King fees forth in it as a principal Rea« 
 fon of sranting it, ihit for Lack of Support for Minifiers^ 
 many 0f bis loving SuhjeSls want tie Aiminiftration of 
 God's H^ord and Sacraments. Now muft not they who 
 lack Support for fuch Minifters, as they can with a good 
 Conicicnce attend, want the Ad minift ration of God's 
 "Word and Sacraments ^ Would not the Generality of the 
 Prtji^teriam and Congregationalifts in NewEngland think 
 they wanted it, if there were no other than epilcopail 
 Churches there ? And why may not Epifcopalians think 
 in ^ like Manner ? And can one imagine, that when tt^ 
 King's Subjects abroad* ConformilU to the Church cftah 
 bliflied in England by Law, were, without their own 
 Fault, and merely through their Situation and their Po^ 
 verty^ unprovided of fuch public Means of Refigion sis 
 their inward t'erfuallon required, it could be agreable to 
 lus Royal Will that they fhould be exchjded from the Bef- 
 nefit of this Charter ? But further, the King recited tha(C 
 Fart of his People, through the foremendohed unhappV 
 Circumftances, Jeem to he abandoned to 4lheifm bnaH" 
 fidelity^ and others are in Danger of being perverted to 
 Popifi> Snperfiition and Idolatry ; atnd both thefe Things 
 he was detirous to prevent. Now dotti not the Doiftor 
 think the Enilcop^liars, when they have no MiniHersfn 
 whoie Mini&racions they can acquiefCe, muft be greviouIN 
 liableto the one or the pther ? Particularly, mud not thdle 
 of them be in great Danger of Popery who, as he tell^ u^, 
 prefer that to the Worfhip of the prevailnj^ Party in Nei(0 
 England ? And muft it not be prcfumed that the Charts 
 would hsyeguarded explicit^ againtl ^heie Evils, had th^y 
 been Ibre^n ^ But further Hill, the King declares, that 
 
 4e 
 
 t P»g. 110— 116. 
 
 '^■h 
 
U"* 
 
 ' H 
 
 i^-^ 
 
 4% ^H Anfvvcr to Dr. Miii H E w^/ Obfervathns. 
 
 ^« /i&iffi^j 1/ is bis Duty as much as in him lies ^ to prompt i 
 Sfre Glory of God hy the InfiruStion of bis People in tbi 
 Cbrsfiian Religion, Now will oot this be more fuHy cf- 
 fefted if the Epifcopalians in New England are in(lru6bed« 
 than if they are not in(lru6ted P And ladly, the King pro- 
 pofes, that for accomplijhing tb/s Ends intended by the 
 Charter, a fufficient Maintenanc/e be provided for an or* 
 tbodox Clergy to live amongft bis Subjects in tbefe Parts* 
 I do not lay the greareft Strefs on this lad Claule, becaufe 
 it fpeciBes only what Sort of Clergy (hould be fenc, not 
 to whom they (hould minifter. And yet, if the Intention 
 was that only Clergymen of the Church of England (houl4 
 be employed, (and public Authority, I believe, hath oever 
 directed others to be employed) it mud furdy be intend- 
 ed likewile, that all the L^ety of the CKurch of England^ 
 who could be benefited by them, (hould. 
 
 Here indeed the Do^or objefts, that Ortbodoxy^ in its 
 mofi common Ufe^ batb no Reference to ecclefiaftical Polity^ 
 But fuppofing that, why may not the Charter ufe it in its 
 original and not uncommon Signifiqition, of right Notions 
 in religious Matters, whether they relate to Faith or Mo- 
 rals, or Worlhip, or Church Government ? The Head 
 ^f an epifcopal Church cannot be deemed indifferent about 
 any of theie } efpecially in forming a Corporation, into 
 which, I believe, no one DiiTenter was by the Charter 
 ^adnnicted. But he obje^s again^ that King William, tho* 
 as Head of the Church of England^ there xt/as a Necejftty 
 of his externally conforming to its Rules and Difcipline^ 
 .cannot be fuppofed by orthodox Unifiers to have intended 
 . tbofe of the Church ^/England, in Difiinff ion from othersf. 
 Thus he i$ ple^fed to reprefent, for the Sake of his Hy- 
 pochefis, our glorious Delii^erer as a mere external^ and 
 coofcquently hypocritica] Conformtfl : though it is well 
 known^chat pn his Death-Bed he was attended by Minifters 
 of our Church and no other, and received the Sacranoent 
 from a Bishop's Hands. Nor, I prefume, is the Doftpr 
 ignorant, that he fettled lool. a Year on an epifcopal 
 
 Church 
 * page 60, f page 20. 
 
 
tions, 
 
 promote 
 in tbi 
 uHy cf- 
 rudted, 
 ig pro- 
 by the 
 an Of' 
 Parts. 
 jecaufe 
 nc, not 
 tention 
 I {houl4 
 h ocvcr 
 intend- 
 
 " ^ ■ 
 y, in its 
 Polity^, 
 \ it in its 
 Kotions 
 or Mq- 
 c Head 
 fical^uc 
 on» into 
 Charter 
 im, tho* 
 Neceffity 
 Ifcipline^ 
 intended 
 otbersf. 
 his Hy- 
 ij/, and 
 t is well 
 ^inifters 
 cranoent 
 jDoftpr 
 rpifcopal 
 Church 
 
 yfn Anfwer to Dr. Ma yh e w'/ Obfervations, 23 
 
 Church at Botfcn-f ^ which clearly (hews* that he thought 
 epifcopal Churches proper Objedts oi Royal Bounty, evca, 
 in Places where there was a fettled Miniftry of anotiier 
 Sort before. A nd his Succedors to this Day have thought 
 in f^he lame Manner. But had he been ever fo rigid a 
 Nonconformift, every Word of his Charter muft have 
 bern interpreted, not by his private Opinion, but by the 
 Spirit of the Laws and the Conftitution. 
 
 The Dodor pleads alfo, that divers of the New Eng- 
 Und LawSi relative to Minifters, in wbicb tbey are de- 
 figned as ortbodox^ have bad tbe Allowance of the King § 
 And had the Intent of thefe Laws been to enad, that they 
 were orthodox, the Plea would have been of fome Weight. 
 Rut where the King only alTents to a Bill, framed for a- 
 nother Purpofe, in which this Word, ufed by them con>- 
 cerning themfelves, is to be found, his Connivance at their 
 Ufe of it, againd which it might h#ve been hurtful to ob** 
 jedt, can never (hew, in what Senfe he ufes it of his own 
 Accord in ^^Englifi Charter. He faith likewife fromMr. 
 Hobart^thsX if we think none hut tbeClergy oftbeCburcb of 
 England are in a legal Senfe ortbodox MiniSiers^we may ba 
 informed bpw tbat Matter was determined by tbe King in 
 Conneil, in tbe Caufe between Mr. Macfparran and Mr. 
 Torrey*. But the Council did not declare the diiTenting 
 Nfinifters to be orthodox in the legal Senfe, but in the 
 Senfe of the Donors of the Land in Difpute. And this 
 Anfwer Mr. Beacb gzvt long ago to Mr. Hobartf, But 
 the; Do^or hath chofen to repeat the Qbje^ion, without 
 taking Notice of the Anfwer. 
 
 He urges alfo, that if we deny tbe New England Mi- 
 ni fiers the Title of orthodox^ we muft deny it to the Mini- 
 Jiers of all other Churches, except perhaps that <?/Rome §, 
 and engrofs the whole of that precious Commodity, as he 
 fcornfuUy calls it, to our own Party\\, Now he knows 
 in his Heart, that we think the Church of Rqme far more 
 heterodox than we do any of the Proteftant Churches, 
 
 yet 
 
 f HuMphrey*% Account, p. 7, 313. ^ p. 61. * p. 62, 63. 
 t Second Vindicatioa or Addrefs, p 69. §p. 61. 1| p. 59* 
 
 4! 
 
24 yt» AflfWcr to Dr. Ma y h EWsOifiruaihftf, 
 
 jtt he coalcf not refift the Temptation of infitiutting the , 
 Cftntrary. I hope his Confcience wiU do him the kind 
 Office of putting hitir to the Blb(h in private, for this and 
 libany hke Inftanees of I^fingcpuity. As to other 
 Churches, fo far as their Opinions differ from iHirs, be&e 
 in Points more or lefs material, we db indeed think them 
 ihif^aken, ois if the Do^or pleafes, heterodox, but with- 
 out the Icaft Contempt of them, or Breach of brotherly 
 Jjovc toward; them .* and we allow them to think us fo^ 
 Without taking it amif^. But he hath thought fit to ac- 
 quaint us, that Heterodoxy and Hercfy are the fame. 
 Thing*. So that whoever difTents from Dr. Maybew in 
 any Point relative toChriftian Faith, it feems, is accoun- 
 ted by htm an Heretick. His New England Brt^reRt 
 ^indeed they acknowledge him for a Brother, aredefired 
 to confider the ConfequenCes of this Way of thinking* 
 9f^ hkv^ hot fi learned Cbrifff, 
 'But the Do^or hath not yet d«ne with OrtMimtfi 
 fbai freeious Commodity^ he fancies, wiil afford him Mi 
 forther Advantages. And therefore he* tcH us, it 4 
 ' known, or ^ leaffc generally fuppoled am6ngft them, 
 that their iVino England Minifters adhere muck more 
 tiofefy both to the Letter and the ^pmt iff ibe^ Do&rtnai 
 '^tieles of our Church than mo0 of tbe tpifcopal Clergy 
 Hem/ehes^* Thus iniagiti&ry Notorieties and vague 
 Su^^tiqns, anfwet equally the Dolor's End ef bl»^- 
 eninjgjthe Epifcppalians in ^ Efteem of his Neighboiars, 
 by inrputing to them Deviati^s Irotn tfie enablifhed 
 Faith, for, which, if they were Tea!, he would, Ifnitp^ 
 (to uife his own Wpirds) be is much injured^ like tJiem the 
 better. We^an only deny the Charge and put himf eft 
 ^e Proof, which we do. And he would ^m to attempt 
 « Propf in rcfped of Mr. Jptborp, Tettii% fome Palii^ 
 In a Sermon of his, and feme of the ^9 Attieks, in 11 
 pretended Oppoficioni) : though it is vi&le at firft 
 Sight, that Mr. Aptborp fpeaks t>fdy agatnft theDo^^kie 
 tjf unconditional Reprobation, and the Extravagancies of 
 
 * ^»j. 20, it, 6i. t ^'^. »r. 20. § p. 60. 1^^'TS,' 77« 
 
 Si 
 
^ -1 ^ 
 
 yin Anfwer to Dr. Ma y^ e w*/ Ohfirvation^^ 25 
 
 the Antimmans^ and that the Artlcks quotj^d aifert 
 neither of them. But this Acculation ferved a dpubljp 
 Purpbfe; of intimating firft, that Mr. Aptborp rubfcribcd 
 the Articles infincerely, and then affcding to bring him 
 cfFby a Subterfuge, of which he hath no Need, . that 
 poffibly be bath (thtre4 his Opinion Jince, 
 
 I have dwelt too long, in Compiaifance to the Dbdor, 
 on the Term orthodox. Now I proceed with his Ffoofs 
 of the Society's Mifconduft. He allcdges, that Br, 
 Bray took great Pains to inform bimfelf of the State of 
 Religion in the Colonies \ and delivered it^ as the Refult 
 of his Inquiries^ that be found no need at all of Miffionaries 
 in Connecticut and the Maflachufetts *. This a^ain he 
 quotes from Mr. Hobart \ and a^ain omits to take Notice 
 of the full Anfwer which Mr. Beach had given 10 it four- 
 teen Yjsars ago, in ihcfe Words : ** I grant there was a 
 •• Time, when, as Dr. Bray faith, there was little cr no 
 << Occafion of fending Miffionaries to the Majfacbufetts 
 •* or ConneQieut^ bccaufe there were then few or no 
 *' Church People who wanted a Minifter. Yet now the 
 ** Cafe is very much alter'd ; and as there are fome thou- 
 ^* fands, fo they are like to incrcafe f." Had the Delign 
 of the Society, in fending Miffionaries to thofe two Go- 
 vernments, been to make Profelytes, they would have 
 thought there was mofiNeed, inftead of noNeed,to fend, 
 when there were fewcft Church People in them. But 
 they fcnt none for ci^ht or nine Year^, as Dr. May hew 
 himfclf obferves §': and they have fent them afterwards, 
 jufl; as the Necelfities of the People required ; not to pro- 
 pagate the Peculiarities of the Church of England^ as be 
 pretends jj, but to preferve a due Senfe of Chrillianity, 
 ,and perform religious Offices amongft its Members. 
 . . The Do<5lor ajledges alfp, that in fome Churches^ which 
 according to the AhjtraSfs have been reprefented as grow- 
 ingy flouri(hing^ and increajing in Reputation^ for near 
 half a Century y the Number offtated fVorfhippers at this 
 
 D Bay 
 
 •* Pag. 41, 42. t Second Vindicatien or Addrcfs, p. 67, 6S. 
 § P- 44. . II p. 43. , 
 

 
 I, 
 
 i^ yft Anfwrer to Dr. Ma yh e wV Obfervationsi 
 
 JOay very little^ if any Things exceeds ten tr ttmlve' 
 famiUei* Yet he tells us himfclf, that in 171 8, which 
 is not half a Century ago, there were but three Miflions 
 in all New England^: : and every one of ihcfc far exceeds 
 that Nun)ber of Families 5 as do the latter alfo, if we 
 if w« Riay believe Accounts, as credible as the Doftor*Sy 
 who, though he denies thofe of the Miflfionaries to be 
 true, confeffes, that the direSl Proof of a Negative infuch 
 Cafes, is no eafy Matter*. The Society wi(h, and 
 endeavour to be well inforqied, concerning the Number 
 of Families in every Miflion. If they are mifinformed 
 only in fome few Inftances, it is neither a great Marvel 
 nor a great Objeftion. And if they apprehend many 
 Miflions to be more confiderable than they arc, fincc 
 Epifcopacy thrives fo. poor]y,theDoftor hath noReafbn to 
 be alarmed about it. For fuppofing thcnfv to have en- 
 gaged in the Enterprize which he imagines, they will 
 ccrtkinly grow fick of it and abandon' it. But indeed t 
 dojj^t, wnctherany cnc of them ever dreamt of what he 
 15 picafed to fay bath lang been, their formal Defign^ the 
 true Plan and grand Myftery of their Operations in New 
 England ||. 
 
 , Another Thing, aflcrtcd by him, is, that after epifco- 
 jpal Congregfitions in fome Places have become well able 
 tojupport their own Minifters, the Society have ftill con- 
 tinued to pay tbefe : to which he adds, that/i&^ only Rea- 
 fon, why he doth not come to Particulars^ is^ lellitjhould 
 fern tpo invidious \ and that this Conduit of the Society 
 for fome Tears, proved no. inconftderable Means of increa- 
 ftng the Church party %, Now the Society hath always 
 been defii-ous to know, when any Congregation became 
 able to lupport itfclf without their Help; and have never 
 continued their Contribution, when they have under ftood 
 . that to be the Cafe. If their Friends have been too (low 
 . in giving them Intelligence, which may have happened, 
 and the Dodlor will favour them with any, which on In- 
 quiry ihall appear to be well grounded, they will both 
 
 be 
 
 * Pag. 48. t P' 44. ♦ P- S3. I p> 49. ■ § IW3. 
 
Ax Anfwer to Dr. M a y h e wV Ohfervathns. 27 
 
 be thankfol to him, and fliew the WorJd that they are 
 far from wifhmg to incrcife the Church Party by prdfufc 
 Liberalities. 
 
 'The DoAor exaggerates the Fault, with which he char- 
 ges the Society, of mifapplying their Money, by alledg- 
 ing further, that they have done no Good by it. He de- 
 clares) that i&^ never knew an Example of any Projelyfe 
 fnm iheir Churches to ourSy being brought back to a Chrijf- 
 4ian life : but that there are numerous ones of Perfons^ 
 whofi Morals^ though exceptionable hefpre^ were much 
 worfe afterwards 5 that they often become loofe^ profligate^ 
 vain and cenforious^ feemingly placing no fmall Part of 
 thtir Religion in railing at their congregational and Pref 
 )tyUrian Neighbours*, Now in Anfwer to an Accufation 
 ©f the fame Nature, brought by Mr. Hobart^ Mr. ^eac% 
 h!\th ferieujly declared^ that he hath known many Perfons 
 who have greafly improved in Virtue by the Changef. And 
 fiother worthy Miflionaries have declared the fame Thing. 
 The pp^or indeed will perhaps treat me for producing 
 -Mifiiooarles, as he ha;h Mr. Apthorp for producingMem- 
 bjers of the Society, as Wttneffes in what he calls their own 
 Caufe§. But the Teftimony of its Accufer i& not more 
 ^milTible. The Zealots of all Parties^ and thofe o£ his 
 own at leaft as much as others, are mighty apt to fpeak 
 V'ith oyergreat Sevetity of fuch as forfake them. And if 
 the Doftorhimfelf doth not place fome Part of his Reli= 
 ' gion i^; railing at the Epifcopaiians, it is very hard to ac- 
 '.count for his pradifing it^ fo much. But bcfides, the 
 Que^ioR is not, whether Prufclytes to the Church of Eng- 
 land gj^ovf better^ but vyhether the Members of the Church 
 of England would not grow worfe, if they had no dated 
 
 Miniftry to. prevent it. 
 
 Inattentive to this, he urges further, that fwearing, ga- 
 ming, &c. are beyond all Comparifon more frequent^ fm'ce 
 ■ the Church y?/ England prevailed there, than before*. Yec 
 Mr. Bei*f;h faith, he is perfuade4, that f olid ChripanV ir- 
 
 D 2 ' tue^ 
 
 ' ■ * Pag. 82. t Firft Vindication 01 Addrefs, p. 43. § p. 9, 70 
 
 i 
 
 is 
 
 if 
 
 ^ I 
 
 4 ^ 
 
 .|H^;7»: 
 

 l> *' 
 
 
 :|y- 
 
 28 ^H Anfwer to Dr. Mayh ewV ObfirvatioHs. 
 
 iuij as well as Knowledge^ increa/es, as the Cbtfrcb gains 
 Ground in the Country i and tb'ou/ands of People are really 
 hetter'd by it in tkeir moral Cbara^erf. But fuppoiing 
 the abovementioncd Vices arc more frequent fince that 
 Time, fo I fear the|e and others are in England Iince the 
 Revolution and the Toleration. Bub Would |t not be very 
 wicked to afcribe the Increafe of them to either of thefe ? 
 Arc the Miflionaries Examples of Vice ? The Doftpr hath 
 not dared to fay it. Do they preach in Favour of Vice ? 
 Are they not as diligent and zealous to the full in teach- 
 ing moral Duties, as the Miniders of his Communion, if 
 not naore fo ? And why then are the Imnioraliiies, of 
 which he fpeaks, tb be imputed to them, or the Society, 
 or the Church «)f England^ when perhaps his own Prichos 
 are as much degenerated as any r H^ declares indeed, 
 'that be will j^ot affirm that ibis is greatly tit,eWork4if4he 
 Society. But he hath done his utmotttd make others thii^ 
 it ^ and, I Tuppofe, itpigines that Epifcopalians defervic 
 no better Treatment. In one Thing however he hath 
 dealt very fairly. , After ex pre fling his Perfuafion, that 
 tbere is lefs real Religion in thofe Parts <?/ New England, 
 wbere the Society's Money bath been expended^ >ban 
 tbere would bave heen^ bad it been funk in tbeOcean^ he 
 adds, *tis not to be fupfofid tbat any Epifcopalisns can he 
 cftbis Opinion ; neither is any Strefslaid upon it in the 
 prefent Argument*. ^ ''^- 
 
 Mr. Aptborp aflerts that, inftead of Harm, the New 
 England Mlfllonaries have done great Good there ; that 
 the religious State of the Country ismanifeHly imfrovedy-^ 
 'though mtfcb ir^deed regains to be done in Manners and 
 Piety. And here tiic Dodlor, with his ufual Charity, 
 reprcfcnts him as making a Conrejion^ tbat this boafted 
 Reformation very little^ if at alh confifts in the Improve- 
 ment of Piety and Morals^. Then he proceeds, with- 
 out any Gccafion given him, to a mock Defence of the 
 formal Air^ which he admits ihe old Divines of that 
 Country had, compared with the jovial Countenances 
 
 which 
 
 f SecoQd Viodication or Addrcfs/ p. 6c. ^p. 96, p7 f ^. 73* 
 
An Anfwcr to Dr. Mayhew'j Obfervations. if 
 
 ^ which he afcribes to the Mifllonaries f. What the Dac« 
 tor's Countenance is, I know not ; but I wifli he gave 
 as good Proofs of a ferious Heart, as the Miflionarie; jii 
 general do. That Religion wore a gloomy and uninvi- 
 ting Appearance amongft the Puritancs there formerly, 
 and now wears a more pleafing one among their Defcen* 
 dants, and that in part they have learnt this Alteration 
 for the better from the Members of the Church of England^ 
 the Doctor, I prefume, will not deny, though he will not 
 permit an Epifcopalian to fay it; and Mr. Apborp did 
 not mean to fay more on this Head. 
 
 What he faith in the next Place, of the Improvements 
 lately made there in the fpcculative Do(^rines of Religion, 
 the Doctor endeavours to conftrue into a licentious Infuk 
 pn their Fathers vndi Teachers, living and dead\ \ of 
 which Mr. Aptborp had evidently no Intention, though 
 he doth ufe a Urong ExprefTion or two, which probably 
 wcpe not meant even df the dead Teachers at large, but 
 of the wild S^dlaries with which that Country abounded}. 
 At ieaft they cannot be meant of the living Fathers, be*- 
 cault he both owns and pleads that the Faults, which he 
 blames', are amended. And after abufing him for fome 
 Time, • the Doctor himfelf allows, it was too cemmona 
 *mttg for People in New England to exprefs tbemfelyes 
 in a Manner jufily fxceptionably upon tbeje Points \ and 
 that ihey may be indebted to the Soci:ty otthciv Miffionor 
 Ties inibme Degree^ for their doing otherwife now *. So 
 that in the main he agrees with Mr. Aptborp^ at the faqie 
 Time that he inveighs againft him ; and probably wifhes 
 that far greatar Changes were made, in the fpeculative 
 Doctrines of his Brethren, than , the ; Society and its 
 tMilTiOnarics would approve. , mo-^^ 
 
 Mr. Aptborp adds, that Hypocrify bath worn iffi tn 
 
 ' Proportion as Men have feen the. Beauty} of HolinefsitYm 
 
 is, in Proportion as the Face of Religion hath become 
 
 amiable, and its Doftrines have been rationally explained ; 
 
 the 
 
 f\^ • 
 
 :*tPage74 
 
 p. 75- 
 
 § Stt Humphrfy4*9 Acconot, p 3*» 37>38 
 
 I 
 
 m 
 
 'if'' I 
 
'A. 
 
 «■ 
 
 it AttAiaSviiittr'Dn Ha V A e ^^/ Oifefvathns, 
 
 tlMTwor Thmg$ wbiiih he had mtot'toned imfntdi««e(/ 
 
 tuefore. But the Dofb»r cbufes to miitsnderftand him of 
 
 the Beauty of Rkes, un4 Mtdis and Farms, ia order 
 
 to gee an OpporctiQity of reproaching the Church of 
 
 England ag«n as plactng Hblifyefs in a Zf^f^^ t^*fi\ 
 
 whidh k notorioufly- doth not. lvi'\{k others ware as far 
 
 from placing it ip a Zeal agaioH them. ^ .. 
 
 •^ '^The laft Inftai^oe of religious Improvemenr, i(> whic^ 
 
 Mf. ^jjiA^rp thinks the MilTionaries have befcn inftrutnenr 
 
 IAK is the exterminating nf Perfecution, On this the Df . 
 
 obfcrves, that no AMs of Uniformity ever took Place in 
 
 NfeW Etigland +. Very true, for they could not olKain 
 
 4!hem: d^^ there was a Time when they certainly would* 
 
 ftUt they rtiade a Shift to perfccute pretty cfFcftually wich- 
 
 c/ut them He adds, th^ na Perfejcuuon badlfeen known 
 
 ^mbngft them f4r nuny Tedr^^kefori < t^e Society vfa$ in 
 
 BtingW- But can he proi^ that they held it unlawful be^ 
 
 ^e that Time? He repreleats it as incredible, that tlie 
 
 fiojterity of tbofe who had ferfeeutei their Fathers intp 
 
 AVneHca, fh )Uld ieach theprefent Generation their Cbari- 
 
 ^ and ModiraHonf But why more incredible, than thtM: 
 
 iSft Foderity of thoife who had perfecuted the Quakers in 
 
 :/thteriedi ihould now be Enemies to PerfeCucion ? The 
 
 -A^ttf ifoleratioii iR^spa0ed by Members of the Church 
 
 dF En^hnd. Nl#. JL^i^^ aMembvrof the fame Church, 
 
 %as, of al( EngUfh Writers, tiie^teateft Advocate for Tq- 
 
 h;raci6n. TheEfteem of it inereafed continually.^ The 
 
 Generality of our MiiliohaHes, i hope, carried that Efteem 
 
 #ith them into New England. Their Need of Toleration 
 
 there, muft rccomrftend it ftiH more to their goodOpini- 
 
 cn ; theNecefflcy of allowing it to them muft gradually 
 
 reconcile otliers to an Approbation of that Allowance;; 
 
 indHbecter Motives, 1 doubt r.ur^ co-operated wich thefei 
 
 Whibhh^d the (tfbnjgeflr Influence, Ido not undertake to 
 
 determihe. But fureiy the Do^or goes too f^r, when he 
 
 ilfth. Wherever we haml Chrifiian Charity tomards thofe 
 
 Mo differ from us^ we did not learn it of the Church of 
 
 . England 
 
 •p, 79 t lb. I page 80 .; : « 
 
An Anfwcr /<? JDr. Ma y h b wV Obfervations^ 3^ 
 
 England. Where elfe they learnt ir, he dbtb not ikf% 
 and they terfainly nught learr> it from her, unlciS' thef 
 difdained to learn any Thing from her. Where he learnC 
 it indeed will be very needlefs to inqinre, tilt he gives bet- 
 ter Proofs of his having learnt it at all. For one who uies 
 his Pen in fucb a Manner, leems but too likely, notwitb-^ 
 ftanding a few ExprelTions^ of gentler Import here and^ 
 there, to ufe other Weapons, if he bad the Conxnand of 
 them. Yet I do not fofpeA him of hoping u> /ho4^ Spi^« 
 copaHans as f reefy as Pigeons % though he faith it iscrcd^* 
 biy reported, that fome of the warm Epifiopalians bep€> 
 fvr the Time when they may treat Diffinters (o*. Mr^ 
 Beach on the other Hand, hath acloally beard fome of the. 
 Prefbyterians /(«y, it was Pity that alltbafiy wb&Jirfif»^ 
 Up theWorfhip of God according to the Chitfch </Engka(i> 
 in that Country t had not been hanged^ ss the ^uiiiers* 
 imere formerly at Bodon ||^ Such hot-headed Creatures^ 
 1 am perfuaiied, fay much more than they deliberatelyi 
 think ; and are coo few, on either Side* to deferve the No^ 
 ciee of the other. The NeithEngland Ejpifeopalians in ge-» 
 il^al, fo far as t can learn,^ fincerely deQrd tdliveamioi^ 
 bly with their Neighbours. ^ And amollgA^ th6 Ef^lijb,* 
 with whom my Acquaintance hath been pretty esctenfive,- 
 sind without whom the others cannot be formidable^ I 
 know not a Man of the Clergy or Laiety, ^and do not be" 
 lieve there, is ohe in* » hundred, perhaps, I might f»f » 
 thoufand, who wifties to overturn the t)relcflt Toleration 
 oF the DiiTenters. 1 fhould be glad of an Aifurance, that 
 They wifh no worfe to the Church Eft^liftimcnt. The 
 Doftor faith, they do not in all refpeSls find the kindest 
 Ufage from us, being fubjebl to dhers tempoval Imonve* 
 niences f . I fbppofc he hath principally in View the Teft 
 Aft. Now without dfgrelTing to enquire whether this be 
 judifiable or nor, they who approve of retraining them Yd 
 far, may heartily difapprove any further Reftraints \ nay^ 
 many of them have given the ftrongeft Evidence- that th^y 
 do. And perhaps as many Epifcopalians in New England 
 . . . : are 
 
 I 
 
 !il 
 
 I 
 I 
 
 ♦ pag. 81. I) Vindication or Addrcft, p. 28. f p. 80; 
 
ja An Anfwer to Dr. May hew'/ Obfervations. 
 
 » ? 
 
 •; '\ 
 
 M. 
 
 
 ■^^1 
 
 ;h.: 
 
 afv excluded from Offices without Law, as Diflentere here 
 by L.aw, on Account of their Religion. But enough of 
 this. • 
 
 The Do^or argues moreover, that even fuppofing the 
 MiflTionaries in New England to have done Good there, 
 though it may befome Apology^ it will notjufiify the So- 
 ciety^ if it, hath occaftoned the NegleSl of a much greater 
 Good to the Heathens^ or unprovided Col-jnies*^ who had 
 an exclu/ive, Right to the Money which hath been funk in 
 the epifcopal Gulphf, But the exclufi^e Right hath been 
 difproved, and there hath been no deGgned Negle<5b. The 
 Heathens meant mud be either the Indians or the Negroes, 
 Now the Doftor owns, that as to the Indians, there have 
 ieen, andftill are, fome great Difcouragements in attempt" 
 ing to chriftianize them, But^hc faith, that according td 
 divers /Appearances^ the Society have had this IVork lefs at 
 fieart than that of propagating Epifcopacy in'Scvi Eng- 
 land*, i hope he would not have the Complaint made 
 hy the Indian Sachem in June 1 700 1|, reckoned amongft 
 thefe Appearances, for the Society was not incorporated 
 till a Year after. But he faith, that the Accufation ofneg" 
 lasting the Natives in America, bath been infome Sort al- 
 lowed to bejuft by the Society themfelves ; and brings for 
 proof of it, Bi(hop Williams^ % Sercivon before them ia 
 1705 §. Now, unhappily for the Dpftor, Bifhop Wil- 
 Uamsiioxh not fpeak of the Society, in the Words wluch 
 he quotes, but of the Englifh Nation. Nor could he fpeak 
 of the Society, as neglecting the Indians^ and yet lefs as 
 negleding them to propagate Epifcopacy in NewEnglandi 
 for the Society had not fubfidtd Bve Years, and had but 
 one, if any, Mifllonary in that whole Province. But the 
 Biihop's Words founded fo plaufibly for a Charge upon 
 tthe Epifcopalians, that he could not forbear mifapply ing 
 them. He afHrms, that it would not be difficult tojuflify 
 this Complaint hy an Appeal to any of the later Sermons 
 before the Society, I conceive it would, and he hath not 
 ^v attempted 
 
 • * Pag. 72. t p. 9a. * p. 98, I! p. 107. 5 p. 98. 
 p. 134, 135. . 
 
 Eft ' ' 
 
 P'ir 
 
y/4n yhfwer to Dr, Ma yhewV Obfervahgns. 33 
 
 attempted it. In one Place he exprcfles a Doubt, whether 
 the Society have, fo much as begun to ufe Methods of con* 
 verting either the Negroes or toe Indians. But in another 
 he owns, that they have made fome EjfaysfromTime foTim$ 
 towards the Conver/ion oj '^e Savages ; hut very feeble ani 
 Jparing ones, compared with iheZeal of the French to popize 
 the Indians, or with their own Zeal to epifcopize New En- 
 gland. Now indeed they have fhewn no Zeal to epifco- 
 Eife Nexv England \ and it is much eafier(I goon withthj^ 
 )o£tor'sLanguage) to popize than to chriftiani?ethe/«<//<7/7/. 
 Teachilig them a few Words and Ceremonies, of whicfo 
 they know not the Meaning; giving them a few Trinkets, 
 and infpiring them with a mortal Hatred againft thcEngli/k^ 
 makes them good Chriftians enough to ferve the Purpofts 
 of the French ; and no Wonder that fuch Converfions ac? 
 effected with Eafe. . Our Society cannot undertake to make 
 Profelytes in this Manner. Befides, it hath not fuch NuiH- 
 bers to employ, fuch Funds to maintain them, or fuch Au- 
 thority to require their Perfeverance in the Work. Many 
 of their Miffionaries are underVows of abfoluteObedieiKCr 
 none of ours are; and therefore they, will engage to go 
 only where they chufe, and will Hay no longer than they 
 chufe. Reafpnabic Perfons will be moderate in blam- 
 ing them, if they confidcr the manifold Difagreeablenefs 
 and Danger of (uch an Employment ; but at lead they will 
 be f^r from blaming the Society for not fending MilTiona- 
 ries, when they cannot procure them. And that they have 
 failed to ufe their hed Endeavours for procuring them, tho 
 J)o£lor doth not aflert; 
 
 Inftead of this, he firfl: infinuares without Proof, wha$ 
 would be nothing to his Purpofe if true, thvit the MiJ/Iona^ 
 ries have frequently given the Pf^orld \oo pompous sAcCounts 
 of their Efforts, and/poken hyperhoJically of their 'BifficiiL' 
 ties, and been 100 foon difcouraged ^ ; then goes on to mak^ 
 Remarks on Mr. now Dr. Barclay^ Miflion about s^Year^ 
 ago, as if nothing worthNotice had been attempted before. 
 He is careful indeed to tell us, that an Order of Conner^ 
 was made very early [in 1702] for fending two Protelki^t 
 Minifters to the Indians of the Five Nations; rha£\rhif 
 Order was communicated to i he Society, and referred .to. ^i 
 
 E ' Cv».OWiitt§g. 
 
 ^ ' ■* Pag. 99. * 
 
=li-J 
 
 '-•■'■I 
 
 ,'!!>]■ 
 
 34 w^if jtnfwer to Dr. MavhbwV Obfervations. 
 
 . Committee*. But that any Thing was done, or tried upon 
 it, or abcM]t the feme Time with it, he hath not given the 
 JeadHint. Yet he might have known, and probably did 
 know, fpqm Dr. Humphreys ^ to whom Mr. Jfpi^borp refers 
 his Readers, not only that (ho Society fent a MiiTioaaKy 
 ..that very Year, the firll after it was formed, to endeavour 
 the Convcrfion of the Indians bordering on South Carolina, 
 and ihmthe Governor and ether Gentlemen there, thinking it 
 not to be a proper Sea/on, difpofed of him another Way f : 
 hut that in Purfuance of the aboveOrder, the Socieiy,after 
 inviting, unfuccefsfu I ly a 'Dutch and an Englijh Miniftcr, 
 who lived in the Neighbourhood of thofe Nations, to un- 
 llertake their Convcrfion, prevailed on the Rev. Mr. ^ko^ 
 roughgood Moor, to go upon this Dcfign in 17.04, who ap- 
 . plied to the Mohocks, and acquainted them, that another 
 .yMiniJler was daily expeRtd for the Oneydes, and wie for 
 pjery oiber Nation, as fion as proper and willing Per fons 
 €Quld be found \ ihat they Teemed at firft highly pieafed with 
 the Care thus taken of them ; but would. give no determi- 
 nate Anfwers tohisOIFers.of inflru^ing them, nor at laft 
 any, Anfwers at all, though he ufed all ihe Means he could 
 thinkofjoget their G?oJ'Tvill : Co after near a TweWe- 
 naonths Tr4al he left ttiem, and was fbon after loft at Seaft. - 
 The Do^or might alfo have known, if he did not, that Mr, 
 JBarclay,z different Perfon from the aboveroenlioned,being 
 iknt Miilionary to the fame Indians in or before ijo^,trieJ 
 all the Methods he c&yld, to engage them to be inflruBed in 
 cur Language and Religion, but with very fmall Succefi.; 
 thjut fe^ieralindeed would feem for a T^ime to be converted, 
 buffoon after they would return again to their firfi fexvage 
 XiM, 
 
 Kis paffing oyer in Silence the following Account is yet 
 more obfervable. In 1 710, the Requeft of the four Sa- 
 if^^w/, who came over to England xhzixhtxx Subjefts might 
 be inftru^ed in Chriftianiiy by refident Minifters, being 
 thought to favour a new Attempt; /i^ Society agreed to fend 
 two Miffionaries to. the Mohock <?;f^ Oneydes Indians,. w//i& 
 o Salary of 150 1. Sterling eacht together with an Interpret 
 ter and Schoolmflfter to teach the yoMing Indians. Accord- 
 ingly Mr. jindrew% was fent as Mifiiooary, and an Intcr- 
 
 - preier 
 
 • Pag. 108. t lb. \ p. 286—291. § Ibid. |pi£. 315. 216. 
 
 *' r:f •■ 
 
j4n Anfwer /o Dr, v1a\ hev 'x Obfenxaiwi. jj 
 
 preter and Schoolmafler ^ae afl[ig« J: hin^ He v as ^ «^ 
 iented to the Indiam with great S^ en and .^ivcc! 
 
 by them with great Marks of Joy j but ie Pare <» obdt- 
 nately rcfufed to let ihcir Children lean En^itjk There* 
 fore both Parents atid Children were initructcd n the /i* 
 dian Tongue, as well as the Nature of it would permit; 
 But in a Ihort Time ihey grew weary of being taught. 
 The. Fariieis would not fuffcr their Boys to be corrc6t'- 
 cd or difpleafcd, in^ Order to their learning any Thing. 
 As they grew up, they took them along with them, when 
 they went out iii Bbdies to hunt, for fcveral Months toge- 
 ther, and they conid not be brought to a fettled Life. They 
 t©ok and difmiflled Wives at il>eir Pleafnre ; were continue 
 ally making Expeditions, and pra^^ifing Cruehies one upon 
 another ; left their aged Men and Women to perifh ; got 
 drunk whenever they could, and in their Drunkennefs 
 were mad and mifchie\'Ous to the hipjicft Degree. They 
 who had learnt fomething, (hewed in their Lives no Re* 
 gard to it ; and even the four Sucbems became Savages 
 agam. French Jefuits from Canada inOilled into them 
 Jealoufies by falfe Aflcrtions, which Popifli Miflfionaries 
 never fcruple ; and (bmc of the ^ufcararo Indians^ driven 
 from NorthCarolhut, which they nad perfidioufly attacked^ 
 filled them with fucH groundlefs Refentments by unjud 
 Reprcfentations of what had palled there, that they forbat) 
 Mr. Andrews to vifir them at their Habitatiom, would no 
 longer come to the Cha[>€l or t\\t School, not ftirffer him- 
 to fpeak of Religion to them when he nict them occafio^ 
 nally ; but infulted atid threarned him and his Companions, 
 who were in Danger of their Lives whenever they ven- 
 tured out of the Fort, where they dwelt. At length there- 
 fore he reprcfented to the Society, that he defpaired of any 
 further Succcfs. Yet, they would not hearken to his (ingicf 
 Narrative and Opinion, but requefted Mh Hunter, Gxiver^f 
 nor of NezV'Tork, to make Enquiry, whether continuing* 
 his Midlon was likely to be of Ufe» And on iheGover-- 
 nor*s confirming the Accounts which Mr. Andrews had 
 given, they recalled bim, after a Trial of fix Years*. 
 
 I beg the Reader to compare tbefe Relations, t^ken. 
 ffoiix amheniick Papers, with the Doctor's unauthorized 
 • - ' - E 2 Suggt (lions, 
 
 * lb, p. 395 — 911. % 
 
 
 i 
 
1*' 
 
 t 
 
 I 
 
 li t- 
 
 :■] i' 
 
 ri 
 
 I ^■' 
 
 h.i' 
 
 ^1* 
 
 2^ u4n yfn/wer to Dr. Mayhew'/ Oh/irvationf, 
 
 Suggenions, that the Miflionartes told what Stories they 
 would /and the Society believed them without Examination, 
 or wilfully negleftcd this Part of their Bufinefs, Without 
 entering); into the fubfequcnt Particulars of this Indian Uii- 
 dertaking, 1 (hall ouly.fay in general, that other Milfion- 
 arics were fent afterwards, and with fbme EfTeft, down to 
 the Year 1735. when the firft mentioned Mr. Barclay, 
 went, of whole Miillon alone the Do^or is pleaied to take 
 Notice, becaufc he thinks it w;ll afford Matter of Objec- 
 tion. 
 
 Accordingly healledges, that Mr. Barclay had not half 
 (ipybper Support, but the Mijjion was Jlarved, For Mr. 
 Serjeant, a MifTionary from the Society incorporated in 
 1661, reports from a Letter of Mr. Barclay, t\m he bad 
 but afcanty *Allowance,(\.t. from the Society) and could 
 dbtttin no Salary for an Interpreter &r Schoolmafler ■*. And 
 JAr. .^tf/'f/d'^ himfelf faith in a Letter, yune 11, 1736, 
 thai he laboured under great *Difadvantage for want of an 
 interpreter, which could be but enjoy for two or three Years, 
 he fhould be Majlet of the Indian Language |. Now when 
 Mr. Barclay wrote the(e Letters, of which 1 know nothing 
 butfrom the Doctor, he Was not a Mifljonary bum Catechiil 
 only. And though he had, as he (ajrh, bur a (canfy Al- 
 lowance, /. e, iol. a Year from the Society, yet he ex- 
 ve£iedfurther Encourafrement fVi)m them ; and the Aflem- 
 tly of A^^wl^o'*^ had af(b voted him 50/. a Year, which 
 may account for the Smallncf. of the Stjciety's Allowance. 
 Only he had not received either of the Salaries §. but 
 before the End of the fame Year, he Wrote to the S<x:iety, 
 that he had made himfclf Mafltr of the Mohock Language, 
 which probably induced them to think an Interpreter uni- 
 necefTary. The next Year they raifed his Salary to 50/. 
 "Why he defired in 1 740 an Interpreter, as well as a School- 
 mafter, appears not ; but in the fame Year a Schoolmafter 
 was allowed hira. That the Society fhould be cautious 
 and frugal in the firft Trial of a young Man, after fo many 
 Difappointmcnts, is far frpm being Hrange. And the 
 Expence of an Interpreter for two or three Years, which 
 is all that Mr. Barclay wiflied, could not poflibiy be 
 gru.lged, in Order tp fave (q trifling a Sum tpwards a more 
 ,u, . favourite 
 
 * Pig. lOX. t P' *02. i p. 103, J03. 
 
j4n Anpwer to Dr, Mayhew/ ObfervatioHs. 37 
 
 favourite Purpofc, as ihe Do^or would have it believed. 
 Nor did the Miflion mifcarry for Want of due Support, as 
 he leads his Readers to imagine it did. What he quotes 
 from Mr. ^f thorps that/r^w the latefl Accounts » we find 
 this MiJpQft much dtifindUd, or greatly interruptdd, relates 
 to the State of Things brought on 18 Years atrerwards by 
 the late War. Mr. Banlay\ Mifljon was carried on with 
 feeming Succefs till about the Year 1 745, by which Time 
 the French had infuled fuch dreadful Imacinations into our 
 Jntiians^ and incited their own to fuch Violences, that ic 
 was no longer fafc for Mr. Barclay to (lay amongft them. 
 There is therefore not the Icaft Ground for the Dolor's 
 Pretence, that the Indians did not think the Engli/h in 
 Earneft, or chat the French made their Advantage of any 
 Negligence of the Society. Inftead of defpifing what the 
 Society was doing, ihcy were alarmed at it, and employed 
 both all their ufual Arts and open Force to defeat it. How- 
 ever, Mr. Oel, a German Clergyman ap|X)imcd by the So- 
 ciety, flaid with the Indians during the War, in which they 
 were faithful to this Country. And he, and Pau/us, a Mo' 
 hock, whom the Society made Schoolmafter, were ftill do« 
 ing the belt they could ibqrewhen the laft Accounts came. 
 Mr. Bjjrclay being fettled at New-Tor k in i 746, Mr.Oj^/V- 
 vie was /cnt in his (lead to the Indians in 1 748, who found 
 that many of them were removed into the Irench Territo- 
 ry, and the reft fo much addifted to Dfunkennefs, which 
 hath fi+ice deftroycd a great Part of them, that he had littlis 
 Hopes, excepting from the Children, and not much from 
 them, unfefs they were maintained in Houfes appropriated 
 to their Inftru^tion. Now this Undertaking would not only 
 be excellively expenfive, particularly becaufc the Parents 
 muft be well entertained as often as they pleafetj ro vifir 
 their Children, but In all Likelihood fruitlefs, confidering 
 their Difpofitions with refpeft to their Children already 
 mentioned. Mr, Ogilvie took one by Way of Trial, closthed, 
 maintained and inTlru^led him. But his Friends ferched 
 him aviay,. left he /ho u Id learn to defpife his own Nation. 
 Notwiihflanding all this, Mr. Ogihie continued his Endea- 
 vours there, till he was carriedoflTin 1 758 for his Majefty's 
 Service, by the Commander in Chief of his Forces in ihofe 
 f^rts. There are Hill/ or Iftcly were, Hepesof his Re- 
 
 . turn; 
 
 H 
 
,♦ m 
 
 It > 
 
 ■fi.i. 
 
 38 ytfij^ftver to Dr, MayhewV Ohfervakons, 
 t6rn ; in the mean Timci the Rev. Mr. Brown flipplies his 
 
 Befides thefe Attempts, and feveraf other occafionai ones 
 by feveral Milfionarie^, one of which, by Wf. Beachi he 
 faith, was frudrated by the Dillenters prejudicing the ///- 
 diarii againft him^*, there was a Refblution ts^fcen by the 
 Society in 1743, ^^ ^^Y ^^® Converfion of the Mofkito 
 Indians f which Mr. Mohan hath raifreprefented. He faith, 
 fbe Society fftnt fo much Time in endeatiouring to perfuadc 
 ^ibtr thelndlunsthemfehes, or the Government 0/* Jamaica, 
 to fupport the Mijftonary^ that though the Letter from the 
 Jndhni re^uefling ^JJiflance^ bears *Date May I9> I739> 
 yet Mr. Prince at she Time of his "Death, July 25, 1748, 
 had not reached the Place of his Miffion f . Any Reader 
 would conclude from hence, that the Letter from the 7«- 
 dians was either written to the Society, or inftantiy commu- 
 nicated t6 them, arid that the Delay arofe wholly from their 
 Unwillingnefs to pan with. their Money on the Occafion. 
 But the Truth is^ that the Indians applied in 1 739 to Mr. 
 Trela%uney\ Governor of Jamaica, without naming the 
 Society, whofe firft Knowledge of their Application was m 
 the latter End of the Year 1741 : that on this they wrote 
 immediately to the Governor, riot to perfuade any Pcrfons 
 to contribnte, but (blely to enquire whether the Indians 
 were able or the J^amaicans -w'Aiirig, which was furely a 
 juftrfiable Piece of Prudence : that as fodn as they had 
 his AnfWeri giving no Ground to hope for pecuniary 
 Adiftance, which was in a few Months, they agreed to 
 fend a Mi(Bonary and Schoolmafter ; that Mr. Prince, then 
 jri America, being recommended tb them for this Work 
 fhortly after, they agreed without Delay to accept him, if 
 he brought proper Teftimonia Is ; but that Objeftions were 
 mac' to him from thence, which could not be fully difcui^ 
 fed under a conflderable Time : that when hisChara^ler wag 
 cleared, he was dircdied to come over, and ordained ; thai 
 he returned as foon as he could,* but died on his Way from 
 y arnica to the Place of his Deftination : that on hearing 
 this, the Society ordered another Miflionary to be provid* 
 jfcd, but no one could be got. Evidently there was no 
 Backwardnefs in this Cafe ; but Afllftance was moft readily 
 
 • Seeded Viodirtuoh or Addrcft, p. 70. ^crit- 
 
 f Hohart'% fccood Addrcfi, p. 141. / 
 
 I 
 
id- 
 
 j4n j4nfiv€r to Dr, May hew'/ Obfervatwu. s? 
 
 . (ent to Itidians not comprehended within th< Letter of the 
 Charter, not being in any of his Majefty's Colonies;. on 
 which Account tbe Treafury rcfufed Mv, Prince the ufbal 
 Bounty granted to MifEonaries, and it, was made up to bim 
 by the Society^ Mitho might ea(ily and plautibly have excufed 
 themfelves from engaging in (his Matter, if they hadnoc 
 really had it at Heart. 
 
 From tbeie various Attempts it appears, that the Society 
 have always been deHrous, always endeavouring, to make 
 Imprertionson the Indians, And from their bad Succefs 
 with thofe on whom they bedowed the mod Pains, it ap- 
 pears that nocwithdanding their (eeming good Inclinations 
 towards Chriftianiiy, and their Petitions to be inftru£^ed in 
 it, on which the Do^or lays fb much Weight ^^ they were 
 either infincere^ or quickly changed their Minds, and grew 
 intractable ;fo that appointing more MilTionaries, if theSo- 
 ciety could have found them, would probably have beeh 
 Xm\Gt\h.x\\zxi.pnkingmovt -Money, M I may prefume to 
 imitate his^Style, in the Indian Guiph^, inflead of making 
 thofe Tribes in general prafe/Zed Cirifiians ^whiclAiedeCtros 
 to have it thought would have been the Confequencc. His 
 iPre«byterian and congregational Friends have had a much 
 JohgerSpaecof Time for thisWork than the Society ;they- 
 have alfo lived in g/eatNumbersamoiigft the IndiaBi,vii\ndt 
 is- another Advantage. Yet I fear the Fad is rather, that 
 few Indians^ are leftin-iV^wjE»f/flW, than that many arc 
 Chridians. And though the Dccl^or tells us, that two MiP* 
 iionaries, lately fent from Bjoflonxo the Five, orficrwlfeSix, 
 Nations,, give very enccuragingjiccounts of their 'Difpt^ftti'- 
 ^/;§,one cannot help doubting, whether the(e Accounts 
 will' end in anyThirig bcttCTi thian the abovementioned like 
 Accounts given to the Society. I heartily wifh they may. 
 .But furely as yet, it is too early to infdlt us. with the Supe- 
 riority of their Succefs to ours. 
 
 The Doftorfaiih, Mr. Barckyh Mifftoritvas ffarvfidU 
 I hope the contrary hath appeared. M uch lefs was it ftar- 
 ved *to propagate Epifcopacy in N^w England, for at that 
 Time the\Sociciy had fcarce any Miflionarics there ; yet 
 in a.'great Meafure it failed Jike the ref^. And therefore 
 it is very unjuft to impute the Failure of any to thaiCaufe, 
 
 when 
 ♦Paj. 100, io6. f p. 109. 5 P ^05» i P- ^04' 
 
 
 
 
 II 
 
, M 
 
 40 jinAtf^er to Dr. MayhewV Obfervations, 
 
 . when ir may be fb naturally implited to thofe which pro-' 
 <luced the lame Effeft before ; and are likely, though not 
 lo likely, to do it again. However in the Beginning of the 
 Year 1756, the Society confultedfome oi l)^t\T American 
 Fricnds^wbether a few Indian Boys, might no' be procured, 
 and taught in the Colleges of New Tork and Phiiadelphia^ 
 . and fent from thence to inftrucl their Countrymen. The 
 ■ Anfwers to them reprefented great Difficulties of obtaining 
 Children, greater flill of keeping thetn long enough ; and 
 no fmall Danger of national Refentmcnt, if any Accident 
 fhould happen to any of them. The Society notvyith- 
 llanding, the QoWcgQO^ New Tork being not as yqt in a 
 Condition to receive any fuch Children, refblved to give 
 lool. a Year towards educating fbnie in that of PhiladeU 
 fhia, \u which they had Hope alfo of further Afliftance. 
 But a frefh War foon broke out. Now in a Time of 
 War, and it fhould be remembered, that there have been 
 very freqqent ones fince the Incorporation of the Society, 
 (bme taking their Rife in Europe, fome only in u4kerica, 
 little or Nothing can be done, even with the friendly IncH- 
 anst in Favour of .Religion. On the late Peace with France , 
 another Indian War hath unexpeftfedly followed.' When 
 God in his Mercy (hall permiit thofe Regions to enjoy 
 Tranquility again, it will be a proper Seafon to refume this 
 Projeft. In the mean while, our Society hath agreed with 
 that of 1 66 1, to fend jointly a Lay Inftruftor tO the Six 
 -Niations, as foon as it is fafe, and to bear" much the greateft 
 Part of the Expence. The Do£lor, it is hoped, will, on 
 confidering theie Things, retra6t\his Affertion, that /////? 
 more can he faid^ than that the Indians have not been wholly 
 
 ' negle6led by the Society "^^ .At leafl:, as it hath never been 
 chArged with Remiflhefs in this Article, either by the Go- 
 veti ment ar Home, or by any of the fuccelllve Governors 
 Abroad, th's may furely be accounted as confiderable aPre- 
 fumption in its Behalf, as his Opinion is againfl it. And I 
 dare fay thePromifes, which it voluntarily and freely made 
 to the King on his AccefTjon, will be faithfully kept, as 
 
 . j^.as the Cleans of fulfilling them .carjjje found/ 
 
 * ,' 
 
 Page ^5. 
 
"Wi* 
 
 ■» 
 
 IV- 
 
 j*« Atifwif i<y Df. Ma YHttrV OBftrvatms. 4< 
 
 ? With fdiJeflf to the Negiroes, the t>6^ is not jJartl-^ 
 ihHar ifl his AcaifatidQ of the Society, and therefore d ge« 
 iteril AnfWcr wtlF Mice, tic oblcnrcs , juftly, that lut. 
 Weft ladii ^^wdSf abound with thmj^ and fa do fcxncof 
 (^ur pliiitattofts dil the Continent. But in both they livc^ 
 ihder the abfbhite Gotenimeht* diiefljr of hard Maflers \ 
 too many ofvhiW fbrbtd theih to be inftru^bed in ftdi' 
 gion* im others deprive them of Time fbr it, by niaking; 
 ft neceiiltfy that oii IStmddp they dioutd ivbrk fbr them* 
 felVeA. where they are alldwed to attend IJbe Miniftcf 
 dF the Pariih, they are properly tmdeir his Oire ; t6d wheref 
 Negroes abound moil;, the Biriffaes are li general fb -v^djf 
 ididbtlred, that the Society have nor, an^ need not have^ 
 MHfibnari^ m theiftt ; But Fit)Tiiidn, even for the icm^ 
 ^ tiie Pebpiiv m^ hie eafily made without them. Inhere 
 llbey '^ve MHfionartes^ the^^Negtdes are underflood t6 
 be Birr of their Ffodc, whom th^ have beeri dri^ly 
 
 d^gj^ li<|it to ttegic»^ 
 
 txt^^k FBice» where ^eit are iio Mihiffers, it is im- 
 |?^ble to #pppiil,t a (eparace Mti&Qnary or Gitechifl fbi^ 
 iik Negroes of e^ Family, and almoft impofTible to aifent- 
 Me. thofc of ^ftaiit F*niKcs together. The Proprietor^ 
 # large Hi^nibersof them are ufually Well able to gtt 
 f^dxi inftrttiaed by iomc of their upper Servants, 6t aneigh* 
 ^tir|tig SdibdlniaHer ; ^ if fhey are unwiHiiig^ Would 
 be very apt t0 dioPe^t the£nd5ea;iroUrs of Pctfons appointee! 
 ikytft^ S<Jciety. If foch in any Place, as are well difptifed, 
 t^aHbrmamy f^onable Flan for the Jtlflruaion d^ the* 
 Negroes belongirig to them, or near them, wtfch they may 
 eotitilve muthJictta' dndie Spot than the fediefV can rft- 
 a Ibklatte^ thejr will be fiirc to rcteive as nrncfr Hfelff 
 1^ it, as they can cxpcft. The Society hath f^r many* 
 ,#^^ns£intainedCiit«*iiftsfbr the Negtdes in the t^^ol 
 iyeat Cities of iftasOTMi m&Philadelphiai withi^ei^ gddd 
 SSflfea. And of late they have Been Warned fbf it* 0Ver<? 
 ttEiftigi becaiife the Inhabitants may well bear (harStiithttt 
 themfelves. However this bcj they can truly anfwertd 
 §f^&^i^ that they have fefiiftd ncr A fBftdi» - 
 
 
 'I 
 
 !i 
 
 (I 
 
 I: 
 
 I 
 
 
 ■h 
 
 
\^f 
 
 mi\ 
 
 ■ Ci' 
 
 
 hn. 
 
 42 yin Jtnfwer to Dr. May HEw's-Ob/itvatiom. 
 
 towards the ConTeHion of the Negroes, \(rbich they have 
 Ijieen^a/ked, or faw how to give ; and particularly, that they 
 have withdra^vn none fmce the Increafe of their Miffions 
 in j^eW'Bngland, On the contrary, they have extended 
 their Care far beyond the literal Bounds of their CHart^, 
 and in lyji appointed a veir worthy Millionanr, with a 
 Salary of 70 A a ^ear, to inftru& the Negroes m Africa : 
 where he continued five Years, and then returned to Eng- 
 land oh Account of his Health ; having firfl fent oyer to 
 the Society three Boys of good Families, to be educated 
 iui4cr their t)ire^on. Qne of thefe is dead ; the other 
 two have been maintained, though as frugally as was > pro- 
 ^r.yetat no fmall Expence, and taught whatever would 
 fit them to propagate Chriflianity in their native Coun^, 
 to w^ch they are now on the Point of goi^g back, t^ 
 greateft Part of this the Do^or muH have known from the 
 AUlra^, but hath mentioned nothing of it. For it would 
 Have been hard to reconcile with his Accufation oi the 
 Society, that they have difregarded every thing ellb, to 
 propagate E|>ifcopacy. , 
 
 The laft head of his Charge of Nc^Ioft relates to the 
 Colonies, unprovided of a competent Number of Miqiiiers. 
 l|ere he faith, th^ though he wilt not affirm it for Truth, 
 yet he hath been very Credibly informed, that the People in 
 Jfm^tfitfe Southern G)lonies, and particularly ihthifeFarp 
 |f Noit|i-CaroIina, wZ^/VA viere entirely deftituU pf Mini' 
 jUrs^hi^i^ and repeated Applications to the So- 
 
 gety far. Miffionartes, fometimes without any Anfmer for 
 Tears tcgetber, and at laft without Succefs : dXii^xbax Jotne 
 fenfibk and ferious Ferfons from that Country^feijeral Tears 
 ^0, he thinJ^s ^ave. him tJjefame Recount ; but that Whe- 
 ther they \d\dor not, they madefuch a ReprefentaiiQn.(f their 
 
 ^ fad State fir Want ofMinifters, that at the Momeritoi hi$ 
 Wfitin j; tt was not in his Power to refrain fropt Tears in 
 refkdif^ on it. And then he makes his uiual charitable 
 
 , Addition, that perhaps the Society had it not in theirPovfer 
 to comply with thefe Solicitations, by Reajhn of their large 
 Expence in the noble J)eft^ of fupporting and increqfi^ 
 liitU e^/copal Parties, or Fastens, in NcW-England** So 
 
 * Pag. 97, 98. ' the 
 
 
to 
 
 
 V- t?: 
 
 ^n Anfwer^o Dr.MAYHtvr'sObftrvatianh 4^ 
 
 the Dodinr'i crcdibk Information of what he" will iwt, 
 affir!if;l^;irtuth, and his thinkii^ he remembers what Be 
 is oct fiire fii^ ever heard, is produced againft the Society, 
 itjyHfy: a Coaje^re about thenr Motive for a£Hng as 
 rfiey never did aft. Indeed, that the poor People, over 
 whpfe Cal^ he hath wept fo kmg after, would have ac> 
 cepted Minifters from the Society; is far from certain ; nor 
 is It likely from feveral Parts 6f his Book, that he wouM 
 haVe reckoned the "Want of epifcopal Minifters any great 
 Olamity. At leaft, I cannot learn from the BooSs of the 
 Society, which I have'cohfnltcd on this Occafion, that any 
 Applioltions^ made^ to them from North-Caroiina, have 
 . |©^"fjijcftedWpoftj3'^^ But it appears, that they fent 
 i%iiMiiIionary AitneV in 1 70 j, wl^o was difcbura^d by 
 ^ the inteftine Feuds of the People, by the Profanenefs of 
 many of them, and the Indifference of others to ail Reli- 
 gion j that oh his Return they feiit two more in 1707, 
 who after a few Years were alfo vj^earied. out; and ?*gain 
 two in 171 i, who ufcd their belV EndeaVouris for feveral 
 Years, but fucceeded no better, and at laft quitted the 
 Undertaking, Yet all of them were.Men of very good 
 Charaiftcrs, as the Inhabitants acknoMedged. On a ffefli 
 Application, a fixth Miffionaryv^as appointed *iii 1722, 
 who died the next Year, and a fcventh in lyiiiy^^ejitis 
 to have defpaircd like his Predeccffprs.* TO^«IC In- 
 habitants, I believe, were for a Time 1^ tdtlkil^i^es, 
 and very infenfible of the Unhappinefs of tlf^ir Coiiii(of!: 
 Bur gradimlly the Society fuppfied them a-^ieW; and ^r 
 fcxne Years paft, they have had more Oer^^n»^ amdngfl 
 them, though at moil perhaps but fevien at oncl^ thancver 
 they had before; and therefore they have not been heg- 
 lefted for the Sake of epifcopiziiig Nifw Ef^kndf as the 
 I^otefuggefb. The Socie^ hath'acquainted them long 
 ago, that if they, were willing to do whit they were well 
 able towards mamtaini^g more Miffionaries> it T^oukl be 
 glad to affift them. But inflead c^ this, they have ufed 
 thofeill, in n^ny Ways, wbkn they have had already. 
 B|n;icQkrlyf though they have Laws, both foiii^rly and 
 :■>- '%--- ' '^F-2^' ■ ' r- ^"^•' lately, 
 
 • S^^>H|(^^r^/, p. 128--.I43. 
 

 hi 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 .1 i- 
 
 ■ii 1.. 
 
 f ■ 
 
 m 
 
 h ; ; ■ ' 
 
 ; I I 
 
 I- 
 
 :v 
 
 t*. 
 
 4^ ^n,4^fitf0rH pWf ^^yiiii%yi9Uplfirv9ii(ms 
 
 btjifly, fpr Sjal^rics t^^Mimfters, thty h^v« beep tcpipo^ 
 
 >rdepc Qpvcmor QP^ <^)!^ht: he tud sput Things oi| 
 "ich * tooting tlj4t Ac j\sopte Plight mamtajnthfir ^|wii 
 Imiilers entirely* th^ $Pfiecy coHkl i^ot Ba4 Miiii(i<^ 
 to,fen4 pyqr tp himi wh^b Dv^ Maybew hiinfelf wiW. 
 alfqv^ ;hey wQpl() have dQae-rea4ily io this Cafe, i^ the^:, 
 had heep ahl^, becaufe in wqulj hfvc cod thepa i)Othi||gt .^ 
 Indeed we have pot P^rfcip^ ep^fi^ in Orders xxkU^- 
 the P?irt<bc$ oir Ef^imiptopcrbt ^ therefore it m^|^ , 
 limcuic toepgage a fufficiept Numl^r fpr the B^tatiopi^ ', 
 }x^t the Difficulty is mp^ greater toprovide^hqii w t)^ 
 ^opthern opes, thspi if^^ew E^fmd^ wher^ many as^S 
 i:(X)teht to qoine oyer iiPd bf ordaiped,, provided they ipay 
 return to officiate amdngft theii' tUlatioPs jpd liieadiSf 
 An<i this is qne confideraEle Heafon of the larger Propor-^ 
 tion of Miiuops in th^t pivvipce, wbipb thjP Dodpc 
 ^aites entirely toa qui^sdiner^t C^^iTe.. 
 
 iLeljiug 90 his PrQoSfs, ^t U^ Society hav^ Ipl^p^e4 ^ 
 a l^art of the Mopey.ip^iified with theni, he^en^eavootp 
 |o dQippi^fe bow wcfikir K ^ ibews the iiune Ipduia«> ^ 
 "9R ^9 JPP^^erap; in dkis, as in every thiig, Bavipg 
 conti^t^4^oiePrQi^ tihaU POK follow hiiA through the 
 iD'li^iM^/t^e randoPi Cak^latjoas built upon them.. He 
 \v<]}]l$|^^ ir thpugbc^ ^^ 2C ^ears the Sum hath 
 affjto^'l^ j^^ ^kbki^hichlm iaith, forty or fifty 
 
 Ji^^0l jplg^Jba^ bfm^cpMirtably maintmned amngft 
 2iwi^«j|^ f« bi0ih«mfi flacgs^ evfry T^ur^ fmnms 
 tk^r'ifik^^ « l!?ow if i^fty, Miffionaries ^re to 
 
 be j^ :for 1^ %!S^x%G^^ lh9?^ A ^^^: ^iii ^^ ^^ 
 t^<^ ^a 4 a jf«j:,T, Ap4. if opl^ /o«ty MSfipoiiri^ wej^ 
 to h^ Mid out <rf it Mp^y ^o.^eai^ tl^y ijwh^ .Iwy^ 
 tut;, 29 /.a year., 'J'j^i p^ftfir,, J .bp^ve^ w 
 let^l^e i^ aWSffion ^jfi .&^j4*i«^^ He ftitb,,tlU^ 
 
 ^ct no ^u^r h^ ipco^ipeipi t^ I^eckopip^s arc^ ^toi 
 *^;d£t( pach in its turn wilt bear bird on the Soae^. iVa 
 
 ♦p»g.?^♦rt^ 
 
 'i 
 
 ■1 
 4 
 
 ii' • 
 
Aiiiwldiiioiiaia!i9f|[et>r0bght%^bim is, that the'Sol^ 
 pety hith pbmiiu4 Contributions by Senfions, reprdwv * 
 mg fhe Work In n^nch they wore engaged, to be mer«^ ^ 
 the Prof^tgation of Chriibsnity, though a confidentblft ^ 
 Pare of it hath htm the Prot>agatiQii of the Church of ' 
 Englatid; that in this th^T haTe imitated the Practice ol * 
 the ilM^ Society d^fn/igaridajide, though the Preach* 
 •rs belb^ them hare condednned it as unfair; that thtti . 
 the Difienters m England have been milled to encoiira^ ' 
 Defignt againft Chorehes of their own Comraimiop it * 
 fhwEmfit^^ 9nd jmtfimfandiof Pourtds have bectt « 
 dr4Hmrfiom ibm, whith havt in Part been supplied tothM ''X 
 paipofe,^ Now in Truth, the Society have made it dieir * 
 B«iidefitl> do jttfl what th^ Preachers ref^rdent them lo 
 have^bcen doing, otcepttng that they have not been abk / 
 to clo ib much towards the Converfion of the Indians and ,^ 
 ffigroes, Whilft there were but few Perfoosin the Mafif* 
 fibufotts^ and Cmm^ut, deftimte of fudi Modes of pub^ ^ 
 lidc Wofflttp as they coi^ attend, few or no MifEonaries 
 wehefent thither, and the earlier Sermons took no No^ 
 tice -oC this Cafe* -When they motaicd, Ph^vifion was 
 graddatty made for ^Cm ; the Preadiers raeniioned if 
 in genera} Terms ; the prefent Arcbbflhop oiConte^hwy 
 mentkmed it very lisplicttly* above twenty yeafi ^{ mA 
 at th^ £]^ of the Sermons,, both before atad i«^ U^^ ; 
 ibS.^t Miffionaries, their Places of Rcfidenise and :dhei|r 
 J&iWies^ with Accounts of the State of then* k^caXQi^^ ' 
 gr^tions, have been publiihed ammal^. Sucely <lhis U 
 hr remote ^om all Aaudnlent Dealitig. AxuA lio^dne^ 
 that was at ali atteil^v^ to the Prdceedmgft df the Si^icfetfv ' 
 could be ignorant oJF this Part of diem ;: though Dt^dhpi 
 hffm thinks Bifliop ^ier wa8» whea he preached bewo 
 it; viiifdf ' is inaudible in the Haenre of the Things ani • 
 falfe \& iaSL The Pc^ Societf de fropaganda net df 
 wacbliunedittScsraMris before ours, for fhpplyhi^ thofe 
 i^fheicdwaCtfxmnwionrwith the Means of their oWi( 
 Worftip ; hue for maiclog k their principal Empjoylnent 
 m hmg o:9Gc o^r CSifwms to that Worfiiip, which one 
 '*;V^-H '- '■- hath 
 
 • Pag^i^-n^ - 
 
l'~t- 
 
 '■A 
 
 "^6 jitt Afifwet^iQ Dr, MayhZ'^'s Oh/crvatiom, 
 
 hath not done. And. if the Dtdehtets have contributed 
 any Thing confiderable to the Support of our Miffionaries, 
 they muft be prefumed to have done it with their Eyes 
 open, and either to have choiien rather to affift Epifco- 
 palians in that Mode of publitk Worihip, than let them 
 be without any ; or to have lifced the general Defign of 
 the Society fo well, as not to be influenced by their Dif- 
 like of its Management in .this Particular. But I believe 
 the Truth is, that the DiiTenters, at leail forttiany Years 
 pad, have contributed little or nothing. I knbv«r tiot that 
 any one of them is, or lately hath been, a MemBiei'^ and 
 Sublcriber, or hath made any Prefent, or left any L^ikci^ 
 to the Society. Nor have they been called upon, yihdn 
 the Crown hath appointed Collections for it. But fdtat, 
 if not many of them, have taken great Pains to diHuade 
 Members of the Church of Engrfana from giving on fuch" 
 Ocrafions. And though 1 ihould fliiftake itii,^ p^vd^e - 
 Points, yet on the wholes vt^iSai&tylW^ 
 come off very rrdV iii Td><*a df thcf I3tf^^ 
 would neither do it Good nor Harm; ;' -■, 
 
 * But further, probably much mOTe Money hatn B^eh 
 given tdthd'Sodety by the Members of the Chnrcli of 
 ingland, on Account bft}icfrbv}ftcAi which it hifh made 
 for the Eftfcopalian^ -ih'the MafaiBu^tts and Conneilicut, 
 than they would have given if it had made none. Many 
 dF thde amongfl us, who are zealous for the Support of 
 C9)$Mianity abroad, are zeabus alfo, though iir a iower^ 
 Degree, for the Support of our own Church there ; efpe- 
 dally in Places, where, without thdr Help it camiot fi^ 
 p0rt il&lf. And all fuch Will naturally be more liberal tc 
 bQ#Defigns, when thus joined, if indeed they can be called 
 iwo, than they would'to one ^f them, if divided Perfons 
 ire not obliged to confine the whole of tbetr Charity to 
 that one Purpofe, whkh they think the beft, but may al- 
 lowably diftribute it amongfi: ali^hich thi^^itdt ai«good. 
 Nor is uniting; thefe two PurpoTefi what the Do6ior wsMild 
 reprefent itj^ preferring or equkiling the Peculiarities of 
 the Churchof England to the JntepeSs of die,Ck)(ipd,any 
 
 4 '■*■-. 
 
 ' • 
 
 H.:.rk 
 
 m 
 
^^^V:t 
 
 j4n Anfwcr to Dr. MA^HEvr'sObfcrvaiions. 471 
 
 more than the yearly Contribntion of theDiffcnters to the? 
 keeping up of their fmallar G)ngregations here, is prefer^ 
 ing or equalling their Peculiarities to the Interefls of the' 
 Gofpel, They think, both may be kept up by one and 
 the fame, Aft, fo do we. They contribute to maintain 
 publick Wormip amongft their poorer Brethren, without 
 defigning to presbyteriamze England; we contribute to 
 maintain it amongll ours, without defigning to eptfcatize 
 New-England. It would be abfurd in us to charge tnem 
 with the former ; and it is equally abfurd in them to charge 
 us with the latter. If indeed the Cafe of the Epifcopa- 
 lians in^he Maffachufetts and Conne^kut doth not, by the 
 Charter of the Society, come under its Care, Bounties to • 
 to them ,are at prefent conveyed through wrong Hands. 
 But I apprehend it doth, and think that hath been proved. 
 At lead, the Givers in general have all along had the Op- 
 portunity of knowing that Part of their Gifts was applied 
 to this Cafe by the Society, yet they have never fignified 
 l^eir Difapprobation, and therefore it hath underflood it- 
 felf to have been anfwering their Intentions. Nothing 
 hath been clandcftinely kept back, or diverted another way 
 from what was .prof cffed. In thefe Circumftances, the 
 (Jujlt of Ananias and Sapphira is very unjufUy thrownout 
 in terrorem by the Doftor,f according to the old Cullom of 
 his Party, which 1 hoped had been quit& laid aiide, of dif*- 
 charging ipifapplied Texts of Scriptur^ in the Faces of 
 focb as' happened to oiFend them. jBut to return : It is 
 very poffible, that the Pefire of fupplying the New'-Eiy^ 
 A»^£pifc;opalians with Miiiiflers, may have produced Do^- 
 nation3 of as much.M^ney to the Society, as it hath<^ ex- 
 pended oii tbpfe Miaiflers ; now if fb, other Parts have 
 not fu&red on their JVccount. And (hould thefe Bene^ 
 favors be brought to think the Society an improper Chan- 
 nel for (uch their Bounty, or ihould it be forbidden to em- 
 ploy ip this, Manner .any Share of what it receives, the 
 Confequpfe(ce .might be>^ that they wouki withdraw a Pro- 
 portion of their prcfcnt Liberality, as the Society hathfig^ 
 nified in a Letter to the liew-Hampfiire Minifters, it hath 
 
h 
 
 i .11 
 
 
 
 ii 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 fdid R«tte tcithidk chqr ^malAfl ind cftibK&i •ftpctictf 
 |iioid» by Mrfakh himsss mo On^iicioD of che Epifceptlia&s 
 Slight be ltttlc» if «t all, worie than before and the Doc-' 
 tor faiths than erer from being pleafed. ^For the ncW 
 Mausers vould cenaifily be more zealous for proaiiatin^ 
 the intarcAs of the Chnrch of iSngbnd, than the StKkxf 
 baTe bccn» cueti in his ovn imagination^ 
 
 The DoStot ftxppoks, the Deftnden of the Sodeiy's 
 GoDduft to argiic» that it nay allowably fupport Mtffions 
 for fionTcning the Niw-Enghmkn to Epifcepacy^ became 
 this is needfiil to facilitate the GMiverfKHt df the ImHans 
 ia Chri(Uani^4 Nomr they have faid» and f ery truly^ at 
 ^Charter ^ WilUam and ALfi^ do^ tbAt bringing odf 
 Ofim Peofife to a gfod Ufi and wi§dy QotMrfif^w^ is rr< 
 qittfiie to win the neighbouring Nations /» iht Gkri/Uan 
 Faith. They may krie laid a^, and tery trnl^^ihii&diift 
 great Humbera and great Vatiety of wild Se(bme% ha oiM 
 Colonievare a lanenmble Hindntnce to the Fhagrefa«f 
 oiir Religiom^ Bnt I qoeflion, wiiether they have ete^ 
 aaplied cither of thefe Obfenroiens to xhd liruhEs^^land 
 ffKi^sbytirkMS of Congrpgationifb ; and yet rikore^ whdiier 
 any one of than bath fb much as himed, that thiy innii 
 be madeEpifcq^ibaifs^ aaa Step .||if>r^ Biakiag^ tn^lka^ 
 ihens aroand tllem Cbriidians. M leaft, the Bifl{c» ^ 
 Si,D^md\ ihom alone the£)isi(^ haiii quot^d^ md-' 
 Itttcanofiadi T^g. And dH he prodoos^&me Author 
 ^ Sot dia ASim^ he muft be midfcriltKyj to p<it thia 
 Plea tntQOur MoQfhp^ on^ as an Opportisni^, P^y <^ 
 iittrodttittg hi$ WiE» iJboitt fth^ng to connwit me l^»i^ 
 and GemrDam^uA tlie Man ki 4itt Moon^ef wiliaB Ik«t»e 
 WwiilKmt£ttiy,.inlbN^BD!8effion; pardy of iil^spefthig 
 in Scnpcnrs Langnigci^that onr MiffioittHeB^ eNIi^ iiU9 
 ikg^^Hew^iJtst^imA SAii/i^ this imSre^ ^r^xsmoci 
 
 art Thmns ^idRotbark Ibm then he k care^ to fnlN 
 jam immediacely, thar be Mb not mean to colt tbsm K 
 tb^ofipmln^Namis, or tdjghefbeman^ tfrfinalJU^mi0 
 Qood Ma|i^ idbo can Wpe&ldm of it .^ 
 
 y X <f mf 
 
 ■8^ 
 
 ^Site ^M^i#*s VtifMJ^eiMiditk (pr Ad^efs, p. 31, 32. p. 119, ^ 
 
 
:4n Anfwer to Dr. M a y h e w V Obfervations, 49 
 
 % 
 
 
 
 In all that I have hitherto faid, I am far from intending 
 to affirm, that the Society hath not laid out in the MaJ^ 
 fachufetts and Connecticut too large a Proportion of th€ 
 Money put into their Hands, confidcring the Ntceffitics 
 of other Provii.ces. They have a dilcrctioriary Powei* 
 within the Bounds of their Truft ; and whiirt they con* 
 fine themfclves to thofe Bounds, the Money which thej^ 
 receive iS altogether at their free Difpofal, artd fo tar their 
 own i however, the Dodlor is pleafed to cavil at that Ex- 
 preflionf , when ufed very harmlclsly by Mr. Jptborfi, 
 But ftill they ought to ufe their Power judicioufly, and 
 in that they may have failed. For what Society of Men 
 hath not ? Even the Doftor's two blamelefs Societies || 
 might poffibly exhibit fome Tindlurc of human Frailty; 
 if they did not warily keep their Tranfa(flidns unpublilh* 
 cd, whilft thofe of ours lie open to all the World. Pref- 
 fing Solicitors are always likelier to prevail, efpecially if 
 they will contribute freely to the Undertaking fdr which 
 they are Suitors, than thofe who are tefs eatneft though 
 better able. And fuch the I^ezv England Epifcopaliani 
 have been, compared with the Inhabitants of other Colo- 
 nies. When the earlier Applications were made by them*, 
 it could not be fofefeen whether more would follow. S6 
 one Miflipn was fettled after another, till they became m1- 
 Icnfibly numerous 5 and when many Requefts had beeh 
 granted, it was the harder to refufs others, for which thfc 
 fame Plea could be made. Some Members of the Sbdc- 
 ty approved thislncreafe, others thought'it was going tob 
 far. And in Bodies of Men, whbfe Opinions differ, thefb 
 muft be mutual Condefcenfibns, and Time allowed for 
 one Side to Come over into the Sentiments of the othfei*, 
 elfe they cannot proceed together. But in the la(t five 
 or fix Years, I believe, no new MifTion hathijeen appoint- 
 ed in the Majfachujetts oxConneSiicut^ which had 'n6t beeh 
 promifcd betore, excepting that of Cambridge. And no^ 
 for fomc Time pafl:, the Society have excufcd themfclves 
 * * " G : : • from 
 
 t Pafi. 116 — 118. 
 
 p. loi; 134. 
 
u 
 
 §0 j4n Anfwer to Dr, M a y h £ w'j Ob/ervathuj, 
 
 m 
 
 
 from complying with any Applications from that Quar- 
 ter, burcly this alone is no inconfKlcrable Argument, 
 that profclyting thofc two Diftrifts to Epifcopacy hath 
 not been the iVint in View. 
 
 H^hat is paft^ as the Doftor obfcrves, cannot he recalled. 
 But W Miftakcs have happened, they may be avuided for 
 the future, and the Society is not above altering its Mea» 
 fures'*. Doubtlcfs it would have liked, and might have 
 cxpcfted, civilcr and fairer Treatment, than he hath vouch- 
 fafcd to give it. But however, fas eft 6f ab bofte docerL 
 It cannot deferc and abandon the Congregations which it 
 hith taken under its Protedlion, unlefs they ftiould bccpmc 
 either too rich to need its AfnUance, or too inconfidtrablc 
 to dcferve it. But more Care may be ufcd to know, 
 when either of thefe Things falls out. All Forwardncfs 
 in Mifljonaries to moled Perfons of other Perfuafions, and 
 all Encouragement of Parties and Factions in Order to 
 fervc Ecclefiaftical Schemes, may be ftri<5^1y prohibited, 
 ^nd on realonable Complaint feverely checked. The Eyes 
 of the Society may be turned more attentively to the dark 
 Corners of the Colonies, to the Methods which promif*? 
 well for the more effediial Inftru^ion o^tht Negroes^ and 
 to the Openings for doing good amongft tlic Indians^ 
 which his Majt(h *s new Acquifitions will probably difclofc. 
 A friendly Corrcfpondcnce may ijfo be carried on between 
 fbn^e of rhe Members of that Bt)dy, and fome of the Pref- 
 hyterian or Co- gregational Miniftcrs, whofe DifpofuioBS 
 are mild and ingenuous ; and thus Animofities and Jea- 
 joufies may by Degrees be extiriguiftied, of which, 1 am 
 perfuaded, the Society is. very dcfirous. 
 
 Therefore I proceed now to the laft Part of what. I 
 propofed, taking into C»nfideration the Scheme of ap- 
 pointing BilliDps to refide in our American Colonies. 
 The Church of Zi»^/^«^ is, in its Conflitution, epifcopal. 
 It is, in fome of the Plantations, confefTedly the eftablifhed 
 Church} in the reft are many Congregations adliering to 
 
 • it i 
 
 - , '* Page 133* 
 
 <i 
 
 
 \ 
 
 
4 V 
 
 \ 
 
 \An Aiifwcr to Dr, M a y h e wV Ohfervations, 51 
 
 • 
 
 it i and through the late Extenfion of the 5r/V//& Do- 
 miniuns, and the InHucnce of otncr Caufes, ic is likel/ 
 that there will be more. All Members of every Church 
 •re, according to the Principles of Liberty intiiled to 
 every Part of what they conceive to be the Benefits of it, 
 entire and complete, fo far as confifts with the Welfare 
 of civil Government} yet the Members of our Church in 
 Afneriea do not tbus enjoy its Benefits, having no Pro- 
 tcftapt Bilhop within 3000 Miles of them ; a Cafe, which 
 never had its Parallel before in the Chri(\ian World. 
 Therefore it* is defired, that two or more Bifhops may 
 be appointed for thetp, to refide where his Majefty fliall 
 think moft convenient \ that they may have no Concern 
 in the lead with any Perfon who do not profefs themfelves 
 to be of the Church oiEngland^ but may ordain Minif- 
 ters ix fuch as do^ may confirm their Children, when 
 brought to then) at a fit Age for that Purpofe, and take 
 fuch Overfight of the epifcopal Clergy, as the Bifhop of 
 Z*^ff^0»'sCommifraries in thofe Parts have been empowered 
 to take, and have taken, without Offence. But it is not 
 defired in the leafl that they (hould hold Courts to try 
 Matrimonial or Tcflamcntary Caufes, or be veiled with 
 any AuthQrity, noyr exercifcd cither by provincial Go- 
 vernors or fubordinate Magiftrates, or infringe or dimi- 
 nifh any Piivijeges and Libenies enjoyed by any of the 
 Laity,cven of our ownCommunion. This is the rea) and 
 the only Scheme that hath been planned for Bifhops in 
 America \ and whoever hath heard of any other, hath 
 been mifinformed through Miftake or Defign. The 
 American DifTenters from our Communion, would think 
 it infupportably grievous to have no Minifters but fuch as 
 received Ordination in England or Ireland^ or to be with- 
 held from the Ufe of ar.y religious Rite, which they 
 efteemed as highly as we do Confirmation-, or to havj: 
 their Churches deftitutc of a Superintendcicy, which they 
 conceived to be of apoftolical Inftitutjon. t fhould, in 
 ifuch a Cafe, be a zealous Advocate for them, as not yet 
 
 G 2 enjoy in 
 
 OP 
 
 O 
 
 » 
 
52 An Anfwer to Dr. Ma v h e w'j Ohfervations, 
 
 enjoying the full Toleration to which they had a Righ^ 
 And fu rely they ought to a(k their Confcicnces very 
 ferioufly, why they oppofeour Application for fuch Ih- 
 ' dulgence as they would c'^im for thcmfel ves ; and whether 
 indeed fuch Oppofition is not downright Perfccution, and 
 that in a Matter merely fpiritual, without the Mixture of 
 any tem^poral Concern. 
 
 The Dodor is a great deal too vehement to prppofe 
 his Objcftions diftindlly, therefore I will endeavour to di6 
 It for him. He faith, the State of Religion is much better 
 amongH thofe of his Communion in America^ than it is 
 even in England, under the immediate Eye and Documents 
 of the venerable Bifhops •,* and that, fljould any befent 
 thither, it is to be hoped they will have better Succejs tha^ 
 the Bifhops have hither had here f. Now certainly, the 
 State of Religion herk is far from bejng what we have 
 Caufe to wifh it were. Whether it be worfc than in New 
 ■ England^ I am unable to pronounce; fuppofingit tpbp 
 fo, the Doflor himfelf faith, that <3-^j//^«<7/tf might bt 
 given of the Fa 51, without any RefieSlipn on our Church^. 
 And the Q^eftion, relative to the prefcnt Point,, is not, 
 V^here the State of If^eligion is bt'ft,but whether it will not 
 be bejcrer amorjgft the /f/»mf<?;/ Epifcopalians, if they 
 liavc Bifhops to fuperintend their Clergy, JInd dp'thp 
 dlher Oilices belonging to that Fundion, than if they 
 have none. Hp calls Church Government by BifliopSy 
 iheToke of epifcopal Bondage \\._ And certainly Pondage 
 is a dreadful Evil, and religious the word of all. Buj; 
 "what Yoke of Bondage do either Churchmen or Diflcn- 
 ters fuffer in England, where Bifhops have been fo long? 
 All Church Authoritv was formerly tqp heavy ; but fure*^ 
 ly thf Epifcopal now is as modearte as any, and it is pro- 
 pofed to be reduced yet lower in America, and Diflenters 
 will be no Way fubjed to ir. He faith, the; Affair of 
 Bifhops hath lately been, and probably now is, in A^iifiT 
 tion 7« England ; and the Society Jpare neither Endeavours, 
 applications, nor Expence, in order to effe^ their grand 
 
 Left^n 
 
 f Pag. 39. \P. 40. §P. 39. (|P. 146. 
 
■ i 
 
 j4n Anfwcr to Dr. M a y h e wV Obfervations. 53 
 
 Defign ofepifcopi^ing all New England, 4ts well as the 
 other Colonies^. Now mod of the Colonies were origi- 
 nally epifcopal. Ai)d I cannot learn, nor I believe will 
 the Do6l:or affirm, that the Inhabitants of any of them, 
 be they of what Se6lt they will, groan under that Burthen, 
 or have reafon to do fo. The Imagination of a Defign 
 to epifcopizc the reft, I have (hewn to be altogether 
 groundlefs. But further, they may be epifcopizcd with- 
 out fending Bilbops amongft them; and Bifhopsmay b^ 
 fent amongft then), without any Intention of epifcopizing 
 them. 
 
 Dean Kennett^ confcfled to be a worthy Man*, writing 
 to Dr. Colman in 1712, concerning the Society's Dejirf 
 to have Bijbops fettled in the foreign Parts committed to 
 Us Carey laith, as Dr. Mayhew himfelf quotes him, / 
 hope your Churches would not be jealous of it ■\. Certainly 
 therefore, he did not know any Caufe why they fhould 
 tie jealous of it. Archbii}iop Tennifon, who, though, 9 
 very good Churchman, is allowed to have meant np 
 Harm to any Diffenters, any wher^, left by his Will 
 lOQo/, to encourage the Appointment of two Bifhops, 
 one in the, Continent, and another in thelQands of Amer 
 tic a, Biflxop j5/<//^r, whom the Dodor praifes fo highly 
 and fo jultfy, was a hearty Friend to this Schemp, and 
 left 500/. to the Society. Bifhop Benfon^ whofe Chriftian 
 and Catholick Temper is well known to almoli: as many 
 as ever heard his Name, bequeathed to it fuch a Legacy 
 as he was able, /^ be added to the Fund for fettling Bijhops 
 in our Plantations in America, hoping [thefe are his owij 
 Words] that a Ikfign^ fo neceffary and unexceptionable ^ 
 cannot but at laft be put in Execution, 
 
 The Doftor profjffes himfelf an Enemy to ir, bccaufc 
 of the narrow^ cenforious^ and bitter Spirit that prevails 
 in too many of the Epifcopalians in America ||. But may 
 not he think too ill of their Spirit? I verily believe lie 
 doth. Or if he doth not, is thcr* not an equal Share of 
 the fameSpirit in too many of the Presbyterians andCon*- 
 .V gregationalifts 
 
 § Pag. 89. * Pr53. |- P. 88. 11: PH 129. 
 
54 -^^ Anfwcr to Dr, Mayh EwV Obfervations. 
 
 "prcgationalifts th^re ? And ar^ Inveftives and Aft of tin- 
 kindnefs the Way to menci it on either Side? Or may not 
 the Ap^ointmenc of proper Bifhop$, conduce greaiiy to 
 mend it on the Side of the Epifcopalians ? But he fears, 
 that if this growing Party Ihould get a major Vote in the 
 Houfes of Ajfemhly^ Te/is might be obtained to exclude all 
 hut Conformifis from Pofis of Honour and Emolument^ 
 and all Men to b$ taxed for the Support of Bifhops and 
 their Underlings ; and therefore be cannot think of the 
 Church of Ex\^\2iT\di*s. gaining Ground there to any great 
 Degree J and efpecfally of Jeeing Bijhops fixed among them^ 
 without great Reluctance'*. Now this very Pafl&ge im- 
 plies it not to have gained Ground, as yet, to any great 
 begree: in another, already quoted, he fcarcely feems 
 to think it grows at a|t ; and in a third, though he falfely 
 fuppofes the Promotion of it to htz favourite Point piir*, 
 filed at a vaft Expence^ he dill hopes in God it will never 
 be carried-^. The Likelihood therefore oSf its ch ining 
 a Majority, is by no Means confiderable. F:;. if it 
 utere^ would excluding Bifhops be any mighty Guard 
 againft it. So that either Admilfion of them will be very 
 lafe, or the Doftor mud think of more vigorous Mealures 
 than have hitherto been ufed, to prevent thejncreafe of 
 this malignant Faftion. But fuppofing the Epifcopalians 
 were the Majority there, why (hould a TcftLaW follow ? 
 Is there any fuch Law in the Epifcopaliah Colonies ? Or 
 even (ho* there were,can it be imagined that if a prevailing 
 Party in New England were wild enough to propole, 
 his Majefty would ever be advifed to pafs one for that 
 Gountrv ? The Terror of being taxed for Bifhops and 
 their Underlings, as he civilly calls the Body of the 
 Ckfi^y, is yet more chimerical than the former ; as an 
 A61 for that Purpofe would affeft a much greater Number 
 of Per Tons, and in a ftill tenderer Point. iTilhes are paid 
 m England to i{\t<lhT%y by Virtue of Grants., which 
 laid that Burthen upon Eftates many Ages before the 
 prefeiit Foireflbrs enjoyed them. But could an a^ of 
 
 Parliament* 
 ♦ fag/i39 t P. 90. 
 
 ■:i^:* 
 
 I-" 'S. 
 
 
 V 
 
>y 
 
 
 :*»>• 
 
 
 yifi Anfwer to Dn Ma YHEVf*s Obfrevathns, §$ 
 
 be obtained now to iriipofe a^Tax never "known before, 
 of this or the likeNature, on this whole Nation, Di0e(i- 
 ters not excepted, for the Maintenance of an eccleilaflical 
 Hierarchy ? No body will pretend it Could. And witK 
 what Modefty then can the Doctor lugged, that luch z 
 Thing'mighi be feared in New England? Befides, woUld 
 it have l)een a good Reafon ^t the Revolution, for de- 
 barrmg the DilTenters from tile full Exercife of their 
 Church Government and Worfhip, that, if ihey obtained 
 it, they might perhaps increafc till they got a major Votjt 
 in both Houfcs, and then mi^ht ena^ no Morul knows 
 what ? 
 
 But indeed the poor Man's Fears, if you will beEev^ 
 him, run to vaftly further lengths yet. He images alrea- 
 dy faimfelf and his Brethren driven to the laft Extremities "^ 
 by thefe favage Epifcopalisms, and vents his Lamentations 
 in fuch moving Strains, that I muft tranfcribe them ; for 
 they arc the fineft Flight of Oratory in his whole Book, 
 though it is adorned with many. ** VVill they never let 
 us reft in Peace, except where all the Weary are at 
 Reft f Is it not enough that they perfecuted us out of 
 the old World ? Will they purfue us into the new, to 
 convert us here ? — What other new World remains as 
 a Sanftuary for us from their Oppreffions, in Cafe of 
 Need ? Where is the Columbus to explore one for, and 
 pilot us to it, before we are confumed by the Flames, 
 or deluged in a Flood of Epifcopacy ? For my own 
 Part, I can hardly ever think of our being purfued thus 
 *' from World to World, without calling to mind, tho* 
 without applying [tobefurc] that Paflage in the 
 Revelation of St. John : And to the fVoman were given 
 •* two fVings of a great Eagle, that Jhe might flee into 
 *' the IVildernefs, into her Place, where Jhe is nourijhed^^ 
 *' from the Face of the Serpent, And the Serpent caft oUt 
 of his Mouth IVater, as a Flood, after the Woman, that 
 he might caufe her to he carried away of the Flood* y 
 Happily, foon after, the Doctor recovers from his Panic 
 
 • iii^ 
 - * P. 129. 
 
 C( 
 
 cc 
 
 CI 
 
 «c 
 «c 
 
 C( 
 
 «c 
 
 C( 
 
 cc 
 
 cc 
 
 cc 
 
 # 
 
■♦,<■ 
 
 r\'" 
 
 m 
 
 ■y -» 
 
 ^•i, 
 
 II 
 
 I 
 
 
 56 yin Anfwer to Dn Ma y h e W*i Obfirvations, 
 
 fn fome Degree of Cprnpofedneifs, and faith, it is not his 
 bijign however to dijhonour the more moderate and dhrif' 
 fian Spirit of the Eng^fh Bijhops fince the Revolution^ and 
 particularly of this Day ^ by comparing it to the per/ecuting 
 Anti-chrifiian Spirit of many Prelates^ antecedent io that 
 glorious Mr a of Britilh Liberty, But why then fuch dif- 
 tnal Apprehenfions ? Why fuch Outcries ? where arc the 
 JPerfecutprs ? where is the Dragon ? All the World rauft 
 {ee, the Dodor himfelf muft fee, that his Declamation is 
 quite foreign from the Purpofe \ and on his firft Recol* 
 iedtioh he (hould have been alhamed of ir, and have ftruck 
 it out. .But paternai Tendernefs would not let hino de- 
 ]^fy pathetic a Ranc on fo darling a Subject. 
 ^^6t only the prefent Bidiops, but the prefent Age fs 
 grown milder in religious NMKers. Proteftants in gene* 
 ral) of all Denominations, in all Countries, but efpecially 
 in the Briti/h Dominions, bear with each other tar better 
 tl^n they did a Century ago ; and the fmalleft Attempts 
 towards an oppreflive Enlargement of fpiritualPower, 
 would be immediately crufhed with Indignation by our 
 Legiflature. The Diflenters here know it well ; thofc 
 abroad can hardly fail to know it ; and fo far as human 
 iForefight can reach, both the Moderation of the Clergy^ 
 and the Watchfulnefs of the Laity over them, are much 
 more likely ro increafe than diminilh. But above all, a 
 6i(hop in New England would find abundant Reafon to 
 be cacitious of exertiiTg himfelf too far 5 and very thank- 
 ful, if with all his Caution he could Fhve in any tolerable 
 Degree of Peace. Therefare theDo(^or would not need 
 to be at all anxious for the Liberty of his dear Country, 
 though one were to be placed there. But to make him 
 perfeflly eafy, he may be afllired, that this neither is, nof ^ 
 .cirer was, intended or dcfired ; which muft certainly be' 
 admitted as another Proof dill, that epifcopizing that Pro^ 
 vince hath not been the favourite Scheme^ nor indeed any 
 Schcnie, of the Society. During the Courfe of more thap 
 fifty 1'cak'is, that'fchd^og BifHops to yfw^rnV^ hath been in 
 
 r- imitation. 
 
 li^- 
 
ntry, 
 
 e him 
 
 nor 
 
 ly be 
 
 Pro- 
 
 dany 
 : ihafi 
 
 41 
 
 f^^^^:^9^9E-MJkWJft'^> We'Wj^miSi 
 
 %«^#f*y8!^.F9I^^ A4f^piheJJo^iBighr«% 
 
 S% Wyr^W W?' ^^^^:^ MP thinkjpg he muAJwigfs 
 ^ < :^tt|E^ i|^eQ, t^j^« it, hf bad owgfsi;) Uf^^Vfhat wouJ^tlk^^^ 
 
 |f|;()me. iiot on^, <^ his ppmpbua^prangqealreatjy men^ 
 floS^fdj, but or h^ jrigciiious ShjppoiCr^ that ^r.Jaj/>d^prf^ 
 '^,Mk'''^.f^i^%^ tN a, ceraih. J^^ 
 
 J^<^#, nearj^ was even from tiff fpim^r 
 
 k^^M^'40^ tifJP^iace M one of the hunAlg^^Oj^t, 
 tleA^fitf's f ?; $0 mq<ii VTit an<) Ar<jhi^,i><^^i:<v|ilx 
 
 ;ver. d|e JDo^r ab9i}pds in xii wou^ favej^o'to^^^fii^ 
 a^)acfi^ to nuikiB^^ipk^ d^^ / > . .? 
 
 Ij^^^o^^ W^^, tj^avJ^Pcanjwr perceive \yhy t}^ 
 prakyterjansfLni Conffcm^^omlify 'm.Nf^J^fi^ndim]^l 
 not as (afely ttre^the the Tfame ^ir wit^ ?^ ^^^p at thf if 
 ^letWen i n Oid J^agJifii ^o • Hp,^^V^* ^« ^^ unwii)it)g 
 tp diiquiet aDy o)[ wm. l;iy importing atid (ettiingamongft 
 tliiem a ^feature, whicjii it feems they (phie of thein accoprjt 
 to jie ((^ noxious; Qtily we hope, ih^t hisQcca6onaily u^ 
 veifjng tiirough the C!oumry. cannot ipfc^t it veryd?iig^ 
 rou^ Mertrvmn BlfJiopS' are a utiiiorized by Law tp. live» 
 and a^ as fuch^ where^they wj!} in our ^lanfations, FopiiH 
 Biihops reG4eherc, and go about to. exercife every, P^rtof 
 tlieir F un£lion, without O^nce an4 '^*^hput C^ferj^atjot^ 
 ^iOenting Mini(^ersyc(idehere, and ho/4 their ^ee^^|<l|^ 
 
 Ordinations, and whatever Purnofcs ibcy think fit ; an^ 
 
 lefc Aflemblies give us no Umbrage. WJiat we d^fifi^ 
 with refpe^t to New Knghnd, is much fefs: thst a BijQbop 
 nwy, not reGde the^c, but refort fhiihcr front time to timij 
 toofficiate amormll tliofe of our own Commonion.' JJiii 
 ^nljaft. Abode wi(i be in whatever Province i!iw,illiii^ta 
 receive him, with liis Majefly's Appf f>bation : who will cei;? 
 tainly, for ^eafons of every Kind, fend fwch JRerfons Iq 
 this Gbara%r. as are leaft JikeJy to wui^ JL/neafij e(^ 
 Surely the Doftor a^his Friends cancoi ihwart.a Schenifi 
 of this Nature, and call dbemfelvcs Patrons of religious 
 liberty. . ' Xv- ^ * , 
 
 * Pag. 149. t P^9- , * . 
 

 >'i 
 
 f It is pelfible; though it is ftrange, tfi^t wlieo liis uNte I 
 
 VxiOh/mdri^ni, he tw^ mifqnderftand^lie Sodety V In. \ 
 
 tehtfoft, both in feidiDg MUOonaries to TVmv Bufhini and 
 
 dcfiring Americw BUnops. I b6|M it is now fifficieotty 
 
 dwredupi andifhe is ftill dtflitilfieari ificreat hjfii to 
 
 e(mfider,mtlll(enoug^t, wM MMwrtfShirhh is 
 
 rf^K He hathvory«oad Abilities, and a Zeal that iirouM 
 
 be high^ commend&le, if it w<ire dtiljf tempered with 
 
 Chanty. But he (eems 16- liave nfitureny a mo(t vehement 
 
 8iMrit.aiid to have imbibed^ perhapi in hit early Days, 
 
 " tenatfy v«)l€f«em IVepodEflSoS agao^ vSlr'^fame of 
 
 KflMRiB, and ^fer^Thing conneAed with theiii; I am 
 
 fenfibie lihat tlvefe xhiiigs plt»d in Us Excuib : for they 
 
 bave often hurried Men, Minn the whok o^ant weU« not 
 
 bnly into great UnfittrnoRf it^vcd. but far iH^orfe 
 
 Faults. And though I have made tile dr (bme Freedom in 
 
 letting forth his MSlaies and Fsmalitiesr yetif fuflh Treats 
 
 inent, as he hath ^ven Mr. yiflhorp, was de%Mixl lor the 
 
 henevolint End ofjbewing. bim to kirafiif \, furely my 
 
 Treatment of Him will not be imputed to any unkinder 
 
 Motive. If he amends upon Admonition, he will deferve 
 
 much Relpe6l; if not, much Pity. 
 
 • But however he may take what I have written, I hope 
 
 others, particuhurly the Diflenters, both En^lifk arid Amiri' 
 
 can, aa many as mppen to (ee it, will confider it calmly : 
 
 and neither mdulge^ears without ^Foundation, nor aflfe^ 
 
 Fears which they have not, in order to hinder their epiicopal 
 
 Br^hren from enjoying what they have a' Right to. Our 
 
 Inclinatbnistolivein Friend fhip with all the Protef^ant 
 
 Churches. We afllO and prote6^ thofe on the Continent of 
 
 JEurefe as well as we are able. We ihew our Regard d|^ 
 
 thatofS^^0//<f/r^as often as we have an Opportuniy, aiM| 
 
 <befie?e the Members of it are renfible thsit ws do. To thole 
 
 who difler from us in this Part of the Kingdom, we neither 
 
 atteinpt nor wiih any Injury. And w<: fhall gladly g^ive 
 
 Proofs to every Denomination of Chriflians in our ColonifS» 
 
 that we are Friends to a Toleration even of the moft Intole- 
 
 rantras far as it isfafe ; and wiJling that all Mankind fhoutdr 
 
 pbdefs^^l <hc^^^i^^g^s> religious and civil, which they 
 
 fan demand either in Law or Reaibn. But with thofe, who 
 
 approach 
 ♦ Luh ijc. 55, t Pag. 145. 
 
 * 
 
 •• # 
 
 to 
 
 
An Atif(»€T to Dr» Ma y h tw's Oi/irvatimt.sf'\ 
 
 tpproijch Mtrer. to ui in Purity of Faiih and brotfaeily 
 £ove, we are ddirout to cultivate a freer Cemmunidatioo, 
 DiflSng over all former Dilgufts, as we kg Aat they would* 
 if we ^ive tbem any feemingCaufe of Complamt, we hope 
 they will Cffofyit in the moft amicable ^nner. If chey 
 Di^Uh it, we hope they will prelerveFaimefs and Tamper. 
 If they failin either, we muft tiear it with Patience, out 
 be excaied f rom replying. If any Writers on our Side 
 have been left cool, or leis civil, than they ought and de* 
 ligned to have been^ we are fbrry for it, and, exhort them 
 . to change their Sale, if they write again. JFor it is_ ^he 
 Duty of all Men, ^f^ much (bever they difl^ in. Opinion, 
 tosgree in mutual ^ood Will and kind Behaviour . /> 
 
 *»*\i 
 
 "*% 
 
 s' 
 
 nkmder 
 deferve \ 
 
 I hope 
 
 almly : 
 ■ ajfcft 
 i(copa! 
 Our 
 teftant 
 lent of 
 ard, 
 
 '' ^ 
 ► thoi 
 
 either 
 
 give 
 
 ^m. 
 
 firolc- 
 boufd' 
 they 
 , who 
 dach 
 
 [>le 
 
 FIN L S: 
 
 ■» " 
 
 V' 
 
 
 '#