9. ^^a 
 
 V«>'. "■ -"' 
 
 O .. ^'^i 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 4 
 
 
 /. 
 
 f/i 
 
 & 
 
 -^ 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 U 12^ 1 2.5 
 
 |5o •^^ Hl^B 
 
 : itt 12.0 
 
 III 
 
 1.4 
 
 III 
 
 1.8 
 
 1.6 
 
 V 
 
 ^ 
 
 /a 
 
 ^ ,>^ 
 
 
 i*^ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 33 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
4. 
 
 C/j 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notei/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pellicul^e 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes g6ographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured inic (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 n 
 n 
 
 rryf Bound with other material/ 
 LiU Relid avec d'autres documents 
 
 D 
 
 □ 
 
 D 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela dtait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas M film6es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires; 
 
 Tl 
 tc 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a itt possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mithode normale de filmage 
 sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. 
 
 r~] Coloured pages/ 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaur6es et/ou pelliculdes 
 
 ^ 
 
 Tl 
 
 P' 
 o< 
 fi 
 
 O 
 bi 
 tY 
 si 
 o^ 
 fi 
 si 
 oi 
 
 ^ Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d6color6es, tachet^es ou piqu6es 
 
 □Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 rZ^ Showthrough/ 
 I I Transparence 
 
 □ Quality of print varies/ 
 Quality indgale de I'impression 
 
 □ Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel suppl^mentaire 
 
 n 
 
 Tl 
 si 
 Tl 
 w 
 
 IV 
 di 
 ei 
 bi 
 ri| 
 re 
 w 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6ti filmies d nouveau de fapon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film6 au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 aox 
 
 7 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
e 
 
 itails 
 s du 
 lodifier 
 r une 
 Image 
 
 The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Library of the Public 
 Archives of Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 IS 
 
 L'exemplaire filmi fut reproduit grflce A la 
 gAn^rosit* de: 
 
 La bibliothdque des Archives 
 publiques du Canada 
 
 Les images suivantes ont M reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la netteti de rexemplaire filmi, et en 
 conformity avec ler conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimie sont film^s en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmis en commenpant par la 
 premiere page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant pa: 
 la dernlAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 derniire image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols -^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols y signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 film6s A des taux de reduction diffirents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, 11 est filmi i partir 
 de Tangle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche A droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nicessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la m6thode. 
 
 errata 
 to 
 
 pelure, 
 )n d 
 
 n 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
-|>y_ >- 'iTTt^wT^, ^T'-l^l=' 
 
 I 
 
 i t 
 
 K: 
 
 
 
 f 
 
 

 f 
 
 im' 
 
 z^ ~ A 
 
 THE PATRONS. 
 
 (^ 
 
 -•♦-•- 
 
 An Answer to the Annexationist Campaign Writer 
 in the " Canada Farmer's Sun." 
 
 official Organ of the Patrons of Indikstry of Ontario and Quebec. 
 
 The Canada Farmer's Sun, official organ of the Patrons of Industry of On- 
 tario and Quebec, is carrying on an energetic campaign on behalf of candidates 
 of that Order who are seeking the suflFrages of the people for representation in 
 *\- licit L-'iwislattire of Ontario. The Patrons have adopted a platform which 
 'Vta ic-vth tb;.ir claims to public confidence as a political party, and in the appeal 
 now being Made, reliance is placed on the principles of the Order as presented 
 in this platform, to merit and win the support of the electors at the polls. Tt is 
 given in full herewith, as printed in the official organ : . 
 
 ,. ;, \ THE PATRON PLATFORM. • 
 
 (Adopted in London, September, 1891.) 
 
 1 . Maintenance of British connection. 
 
 2. The reBorvstion of the public lands for the actual settler. ^ 
 
 3. Purity of administration, and absohite independence of Parliament. : ' , 
 
 4. Rigid economy in every department <J. the public service. 
 
 5. Simplification of the laws, aod a general reduction in the machinery of the Gov- 
 ernment. 
 
 6. The abolition of the Canadian Senate. 
 
 7. A system of civil service reform, that will give each county power to appoint or 
 elect itU county officials paid by them, except county judges. 
 
 8. Tariff for revenue only, and so adjusted as to fall as far as possible upon the 
 luxuries, and not upon the necessaries of life. 
 
 9. Reciprocal trade on fair and equitable terms between Canada and the world. 
 
 10. Effectual legislation that will protect labor, and the results of labor, from those 
 combinations and monopolies which unduly enhance the price of the article produced 
 by suoh combinations or monopolies. 
 
 11. Prohibition of t^e bonusing of railways by Government grants, as contrary to 
 the public interest. 
 
 12. Preparation of the Dominion ^nd Provincial voters' lists by the municipal 
 officers. 
 
 13. Conformity of electoral districts to county boundaries, as constituted for munici- 
 pal purposes, as far as the principle of representation by population will allow. 
 
 To the thoughtful elector who reads this platform the question will naturally 
 occur : What has this got to do with the election of members to the Ontario 
 Legislature 1 What are the issues raised by this platform against the policy 
 and acts of the Liberal party, as exhibited in the record of the Ontario Grovern- 
 ment for the last twenty-two years ? 
 
 " If there is no important issue," he will say, " the Patrons cannot justify the 
 action they are taking. They must show what the French call a raison d'etre, 
 the reason for a thing's existence. What do they exist for, or stand for, in 
 Ontario politics 1 It cannot be to supplant the Conservative Opposition, for 
 that is not a prize which any political party will seek to win. It must be to 
 supplant the Liberal Government. If so, what have they to complain of against 
 
 Scattered, broken and forfeited bertha. 
 
 t Berths in Rainy River Uistrict. 
 
2 
 
 that Government f What are their grievances ? and what have they to oflfer the 
 people of Ontario that is better than the Government of Sir Oliver Mowat has 
 been giving us for over twenty years. Let me look at their platform again," the 
 thoughtful elector would say. 
 
 / '■ , ■•'" British Connection. 
 
 " As to the first article, Liberals and Conservatives alike are in favor of 
 maintaining the Briiish connection. The old political parties never made it an 
 issue, and the Fatnms cannot make it one. I laugh at the suggestion of such a 
 thing," the thoughtful elector will say. 
 
 . The Public Lands. 
 
 " As to the second article, that is good for the Dominion Government, which 
 has been selling our domain to speculators and all sorts of wild-cat companies. 
 Public lands for the actual settler has always been the policy and practice of the 
 Ontario Government. 
 
 Purity, Economy and Simplicity. ^ 
 
 " The third, fourth and fifth articles," the thoughtful elector will go on to 
 say, " are not Ontario issues at all, for these things the Ontario Government has 
 observed. Its administration is clean, it has not spent a dollar for which the 
 Province has not got full value, and there is no Province or State on this con- 
 tinent with better or simpler laws, or in which the machinery of Government 
 runs more smoothly. Our one-chamber system is the first of its kind in the his- 
 tory of representative institutions, and our statutes are evidence of its sufficiency. 
 As for the abolition of Senates (their sixth article), the Patrons must turn their 
 guns towards Ottawa, and to the States of the .-American Union whence their 
 chief campaign writer draws his parallels. 
 
 ^ Local Office Appointments. 
 
 "The seventh article, as I understand it," he would say, "is the only one 
 that touches closely Ontario politics ; and it is not a matter of very serious poli- 
 tics. The fact that there has been appointed a Royal Commission, on which 
 Liberals, Conservatives and Patrons are represented, with one of the ablest 
 judges of our Superior Courts as chairman, to enquire into the best me- 
 thod of filling cerfain local offices and of paying for their services, shows that 
 Sir Oliver Mowat's Government is not committed to any scheme. They are 
 open to conviction, and like reasonable and reasoning meU' they will, no doubt, 
 hie influenced by the Report of the Commission. A Government's duty is to act 
 upon the best information ; and surely Patrons would not ask to have SherifiFs 
 and Registrars appointed in the way their platform declares if full enquiry 
 showed that it was not the best way. But seriously, whr.t sensible man would 
 think of turning out an honest and capable administration on so small an issue 
 as this seventh article of the platform ? " 
 
 The Trade Question and Labor Laws. . 
 
 " The eighth, ninth, and tenth articles belong to Dominion politics purely, 
 excepting some aspects of the labor question ; and the cause of labor neyer had 
 a better friend than the Government and the Legislature of Ontario. The 
 Liberals at Ottawa were advocates of the policy professed by tlie Patrons many 
 years before the Order had an existence in this country," the thoughtful elector 
 would feel compelled to say. 
 
 Aid to Railways. 
 
 •' Then, as to the eleventh article," he would observe, " it was the farmers of 
 Ontario themselves who by petitions and delegations urged the Government of 
 this Province to aid the construction of railways, and surely no country ever got 
 better returns for public money than from the bonuses granted by our Legis- 
 
 « 
 
 ped| 
 cor 
 
 Pre! 
 supi 
 
 genj 
 
 / 
 
 r- 
 
3 
 
 I ' 
 
 i^ 
 
 lature. Villages have grown into towns and towns into populous cities as a result 
 of that policy, and there is not a corner of the Province south of Lake Nipissing 
 from which the farmer cannot now reach the chief market cities in less than 
 half a day. But that work ie, finished, and for several years grants have been 
 given almost without exception only to colonization railway through lands be- 
 longing to the Province in the unorganized territory. At Ottawa, however, a 
 different policy obtains, and I can understand Patrons in raising a strong voice 
 against it. There it is a huge device to carry doubtful constituencies for the 
 Government. 
 , Voters' Lists and Electoral Districts. 
 
 •' As for the twelfth and thirteenth articles — well, these also are aimed at the 
 Dominion Government ; for that Government alone has taken the preparation 
 of voters' lists out of the hands of municipal officers, and it alone has gerryman- 
 dered the country by departing from county boundaries, in the carving out of 
 electoral districts to strengthen their supporters at the polls. 
 
 The Need of Stable Government. 
 
 " And so I ask," the thoughtful elector would conclude, " where is the reason 
 for a Patron party in these Provincial elections ? We don't want a weak 
 Government in Ontario, but a strong one. Our aim should be to avoid conditions 
 under which Governments may be overturned at the whim or caprice of factions^ 
 as we see in France, where they have had thirty-three successive Governments 
 in twenty-three years. I like the stability of British institutions ; but, with 
 three or four parties in the Legislature, we should see plots, and schemes, and 
 combinations, with frequent changes of Government, our valued system of Re- 
 sponsible Government destroyed, and the people always living over a volcano. 
 No sir," our thoughtful elector would say, " the Patrons are in this campaign 
 without cause, and if they succeed in electing enough me .obers to hold the balance 
 of power in the Ijegislature, we shall speedily see an end of good Government in 
 Ontario. The fanners cannot afford to take that risk. As the great property 
 ' class and the great producing class, their best interests lie in the preservation of 
 strong and stable Government. That is of infinitely greater importance than the 
 privilege of marking a ballot for a Registrar, a SheriflF or a Bailiff, once in four 
 years, or at a greater interval. 
 
 "One word more," the thoughtful elector might say : " I do not at all object 
 to the fanners organizing as Patrons or Grangers, or under ';ny name. The 
 solated lives which they lead on tlie farm makes it desirable that they should 
 have organization of some kind, and places of gathering where tiiey may discuss 
 questions of public interest as well as matters connected with their own occupa- 
 tion. For these reasons I heartily approve of the Patrons' Order. But before 
 this or any other order decides to enter the field of politics, it should be clear to 
 its officers and members that they h.ave a good cause. V/jthout strong and suffi 
 cient rea.sons for appeai'ing against one or other of the old political parties, there 
 is certain risk of discrediting and disorganizing the Order, and so destroying its 
 usefulness, if not its life." 
 
 PATRONS' PLAN OF CAMPAIGN. 
 
 But the Patrons are not content with a platform. They have a fully equip- 
 ped party organizntion, with paid organizers going up and down the country 
 commanding members of the Order to vote for Patron candidates, and a stand- 
 ing mandate in the columns of their organ, over the signature of the Grand 
 President, threatening the penalty of expulsion upon all Patrons who do not 
 support Patron candidates. 
 
 The Special Campaioner. \ 
 
 The organ itself, unused to campaign methods, has called in the service of a 
 gentleman who is described over his articles as " One of the Foremost Writers in 
 
 * Scattered, broken and forfeited berths. 
 
 t Berths in Rainy River iJistrict. 
 
Canada." He is an able writer, he wields a versatile pen, and writes as if he 
 had a personal grievance to settle. This gentleman is in cloi^e touch with the 
 editor, if he is not a member of the editor's stuff ; and if he was in the paj of 
 the Government of the United States he could hardly be a more devoted ad- 
 mirer of that country's institutions. He has, professedly, but one object in 
 writing the series of campaign articles for the Canada Fanner's Sun. He desires 
 good government for Canada, and all its Provinces^ and, credat judants, the 
 '• Maintenance of British Connection ! " '•• ' 
 
 Snuffing Out a Patkon. 
 
 All readers of the organ do not seem to have pinned their faith to this new 
 doctor of Patron principles ; but when Mr. Overholt of County Haldimand 
 sent in an article in reply he was sneered at and jeered at by the editor, and 
 told that he was but a lump of clay in the hands of some political potter — sign- 
 ing his name to an article that some abler man had written. Mr. Patron Over- 
 holt was therefore snuffed out ; but the light of " One of the Foremost Writers 
 in Canada," continues to shine with the radiance of a sun-god. 
 
 The Te8t of Fair Criticism. 
 
 ^ It is the purpose of this naper to examine some of this great campaigner's 
 statements, and see whether they wiH bear the test of a fair and sober criticism. 
 If it shall appear that he has borne false witness against one or other of the 
 governments and political parties against whom his attacks have been levelled, 
 the Canada Farmer's Sun must share the responsibility of the offence with him. 
 And it is no light matter for the organ of the Patrons to open its columns to a 
 gentleman of the biases and predilections of " One of the Foremost Writers in 
 Canada," that he may assail the political parties and the institutions of this 
 country, and uphold by contrast the institutions of the United States. Patrons 
 who honestly and sincerely adhere to the first article in the platform of their 
 Order— and no doubt tiie vast majority if not all of them do — may be paidoned 
 if they do not blindly follow such a guide, and if they seek to l< now the truth 
 for themselves, in spite of the hearty endorsation of "One of the Foremost 
 Writers in Canada " by the editor of the Canada Farmer's Sun. 
 
 LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES. 
 
 In the campaign articles for the Farmer's Sun, stress is laid on the assertion 
 that the cost of Government is ignored by both the old parties, because both are 
 interested in ignoring it ; and the writer puts the party politician's point of view 
 in the form of the query, " What should we do for encouragement and rewards 
 if the oflSces were thinned out ? " This is false ground at the start, as can be 
 shown by the records of the two old parties in Canada, in the public documents; 
 It is necessary to look to Ottawa for this comparison, because in Ontario we 
 have not had a Conservative Government since the beginning of the Federal 
 Union. 
 
 Taking the time under Confederation, the Conservative party was in power 
 from 1st July, 1867, to oth November, 1873, the Liberal party from the latter 
 date to 17th October, 1878, and Uie Conservative party again from the latter 
 date to the present time. ■'■■/(. - i 
 
 Concerning Civil Government. 
 
 Now, in the first fiscal year of Confederation, 1 867-8, the whole number of 
 persons employed under the head of Civil Government, including Governors, 
 Lieutenant-Governors, members of the Cabinet, officers, clerks, staff of the Geo- 
 logical Survey, messengers, etc., was 283, and the total cost of the service for 
 salaries and contingencies was $623,041.82. 
 
 In the fiscal year 1873-4 the number of persons employed in Civil Govern- 
 
 exp€ 
 Ir 
 was 
 to %\ 
 TJ 
 year! 
 it wl 
 tions 
 crea 
 dowil 
 Ir 
 of M 
 052.i 
 Sc 
 crc 
 
 ,; — »."t ' . ' 
 
 / 
 
ment service had increased to 432, of whom 16 were appointees of the Liberal 
 Oovernnient, and the cost for salaries and contingencies was $981,499.91. 
 
 In the fiscal year 1878-9 the number in the service was 457, of whom 33 had 
 been added during the year by the incoming Conservative Qovernment, and the 
 cost for salaries and contingencies was $971,956.77. 
 
 In the last fiscal year, 1892-3, the number in the service under the head of 
 Civil Government was 853, and the cost for salaries and contingencies was 
 11,492,082.42. 
 
 It will be seen therefore that in the first period of Conservative rule in Canada 
 the number of persons in Civil Government service rose from 283 to 416 (at the 
 change of Government in 1873 ), and the cost of salaries and contingencies from 
 $623,041.82 to $981,499.91 ; that in the period of Liberal rule the number rose 
 from 416 to 424 (at the change of Government in 1878), while the coat fell from 
 $981,499.91 to $97i',956.77 ; and thatduring the second period of Conservative 
 rule the number has risen from 424 to 853, and the cost from $971,956,77 to 
 $1,492,082,42. These are statistics of the inside service, and do not include custom 
 house, excise, post office and other officers, which belong to the outside service ; but 
 it may be stated that there is some difficulty in classifying these services in the 
 office of the Geological Survey. 
 
 This statement presents the records of the Conservative and Liberal parties in 
 Canada for twenty-six years of Confederation, and it proves, with the a))solute- 
 ness of mathematical demonstration, that the assertion with which " One of the 
 Foremost Writers in Canada " sets out in his task of edifyiug the electors of 
 Ontario upon the two historic political parties of the country is wholly untrue. 
 
 ' A Sample Illustration. 
 
 If it was necessary to go into particulars, comparisons might be given which 
 would astonish many of the younger generation of politicians ; but if any one 
 cares to do so, he may refer to the speech made by Hon. Edward Blake at Tees- 
 water, in September, 1877, when he showed up the record of the Department 
 of Justice. An extract from that speech would be instructive and very much to 
 the point in hand ; but suffice it to say that while, according to Mr. Blake's 
 statement, the work of the Department had been dreadfully behind-hand down 
 to the change of Government in 1873, with the cost for salaries and contingen- 
 cies at more than $23,000, Mr. Blake was able, four years later, to carr)- oii the 
 whole work, with the help of a smaller but more efficient staff, at a cost of $13,- 
 537, and no arrears in the office, although the work had meantime increased 
 three-fold, as shown by the registered references and the volume of correspond- 
 ence. 
 
 Concerning Annual Expenditure. 
 
 And what is true of the cost of Civil Government is equally true in the annual 
 expenditure for all services, and in the increase of the public debt. 
 
 In 1867-8 the expenditure of the Dominion, on account of Consolidated Fund, 
 was $13,486,092.96, and in 1873-4 the Conservative Government had raised it 
 to $23,316,316.75, an increase of $9,830,223.79. 
 
 The Liberals went out of office within four months of the opening of the fiscal 
 year 1878-9, and therefore were not responsible for its expenditure. For 1877-8 
 it was only $23,503,158.25, or an increase of $186,841.50, although the obliga- 
 tions to which the Conservatives had committed the country in 1873 had in- 
 creased the annual expenditure by $2,600,000. The saving was made by cutting 
 down controllable expenditure. 
 
 In 1892-3, with the Conservatives again in office for an uninter^;upted period 
 of fifteen years, the expenditure on Consolidated Fund account was $36,814- 
 052.90. 
 
 So then it is seen that in their first period the Conservative party in- 
 creased the annual expenditure by $9,830,223.70, and in their second by $13,- 
 
 / 
 
 * Scattered, broken and forfeited bertliB. 
 
 t Berths in Rainy River iJistrict. 
 
6 
 
 310,894.65 ; whereas in the term of Liberal administration the incroatie of 
 annual expenditure was only 8186,841.50. 
 
 CONCEKNma THE PUBLIC DEBT. 
 
 Concerning the public debt, there is this to be said : The net debt of Canada 
 at the beginning of Confederation was $75,728,641.37, and at the end of the 
 fiscal year 1873-4 it was $108,324,904.42. 
 
 The Conservatives went out of office leaving works under contract and other 
 obligations entered into to the amount of $96,000,000, so that every dollar of 
 increase of debt to the end of the year 1877-8, when it was $140,362,069.91, 
 WU8 forced upon the country and the Liberal Government of the time by con- 
 struction of works undertaken by the Conservatives. 
 
 And true to the instincts and the genius of that party (which is now using all 
 its power and influence to gain a victory for Mr. Meredith in Ontario), the pub- 
 lic debt has been steadily piled up since 1878, until at the close of the fiscal 
 year 1892-3 it reaches the enormous sum of $241,681,039.61, with ah annual in- 
 terest charge of $9,800,888.4^. 
 
 A Dishonest Critic. " 
 
 Yet, with such crushing facts as these to illustrate and illuminate the cliarac- 
 ter of political parties, with which " One of the Foremost Writers in Canada " 
 ought to be, and doubtless is familiar, he has the temerity to assert in the 
 columns of the Canada Farmer'n Sun that both the old parties are alike bad ; 
 and he forsooth of all men must write as a Patron to discuss the subject of the 
 cost of government from the point of riew of the people who have to foot the 
 bill ! Let him learn to be honest and loyal to our country and its institutions 
 first, and then the farmers may hear him. 
 
 ILLUSTRATIONS FROM THE UNITED STATES. 
 
 Aiu)ther assertion of " One of the Foremost Writers in Canada," in his cam- 
 paign articles for the Canada Farmer's Sun, often repeated and strongly empha- 
 sized, is that the ideas of economy which prevail in Canada are in striking con- 
 trast with those which obtain in the American Union, but especially in the 
 several States of that Union. 
 
 State and Municipal Government. • ^ 
 
 '• It is worthy of note," the Farmer's Sun campaigner says, "that in the 
 United States there is comparatively little complaint of the' cost of State, or, 
 as we should say, of Provincial Government. Municipal Government in most 
 cities is about as unsatisfactory as it well could be, though the amount of muni- 
 cipal debt that may be contracted is usually strictly limited ; but the State 
 Legislatures do their work efficiently, or at any rate with a praiseworthy 
 economy. 
 
 " It may l)e well to explain," he goes on to say, " how this comes alx)ut. 
 First of all, each State is obliged to pay its own way out of its. own resources. 
 Here in Canada, on the contrary, each Province draws an annual subsidy from 
 the Federal treasury and, as experi«>nce has shown, it is a case of ' come easy, go 
 etisy.' The State taxes, which are direct taxes, keep public attention riveted on 
 the State finance, and any gross extravagance is punished by the eviction of the 
 political party responsible. But with us, whose Provincial resources are derived 
 in part from the Fedei-al chest, and in part from the melting of such assets as 
 Crown lands and timber, the people have no particular incentive to watch their 
 rulers closely ; and as a consequence we find most of the Provinces running 
 behind every year, and, when they have reached the end of their tether, conspir- 
 ing to secure better terms at Ottawa." 
 
 And again, the campaigner says : " Economy in State expenditure is like- 
 
 / 
 
of 
 
 wise insured by constitutional amendments adopted for the most part since the 
 halcyon time known as the * canal and railroad period,' when most of the Btateti 
 then in existence spent a great deal more than they could afford. In 
 
 like manner the constitutions of nearly all the States regulate and limit the 
 amount of debt that may be incurred by municipalities, the result being that 
 both State and Municipal indebtedness is lower on that side of the 1 ne than on 
 this, where Provinces and Municipalities alike are free to be just as extravagant 
 as their creditors will allow them to be." 
 
 Tub Fokemost Writer Noduino. 
 
 Taking up the last assertion first, it must be obvious that "One of the Fore- 
 most Writers in Canada " was nodding when he made it, in so far as the niuni- 
 cii/alities of Ontario are concerned. It is not the fact that they are free to be 
 as extravagant as their creditors will allow them to be. They are obliged by the 
 Municipal Act to provide enough money each year to pay all debts of principal 
 or interest falliqg due within the year, and they are also restrained by the Act 
 against assessing at a higher rate than two cents in the dollar, exclusive of 
 school rates. This has been the law of Ontario for more than a (juarter of a 
 century ; and it is this clause, not the will of their creditors, that puts a limit 
 on the extravagance of municipalities. , 
 
 A Comparison of Indebtedness. 
 
 Nor is it true that the municipal indebtedness of the Province is very large. 
 The net amount in 1890, being the gross debt less sinking fund and oth«r in- 
 vestments, was $32,393,649, or $15.32 per head of the whole population. In 
 the same year the net amount of municipal debts in the nine North Atlantic 
 States — Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecti- 
 cut, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania— was $405,5.72,083, rr $23.16 
 per head. The net amount of nmnicipal debts of the twelve North Central 
 States— Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, MissourL 
 North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas — was in the same year 
 $184,219,923, or $20.80 per head. (See U. S. Census Bulletin No. 176, for 
 1890.) These two groups of States are the nearest to Ontario, and most like it 
 in conditions, and therefor*? they have been selected for the comparison. 
 
 The net debt of the municipalities of Ohio in that year (1890) Wtas $52,888,263, 
 of Massachusetts $70,230,848, of New Jersey $42,990,338, of Pennsylvania $54,- 
 238,547, and of New York $187,348,163. 
 
 In Ontario the net debt of township municipalities in 1890 was only $1,776,- 
 203, while that of the cities was $21,892,459, — Toronto, long under Conserva- 
 tive control, heading the list with $12,768,521. 
 
 As for the Province itself, it has no debt; it has a large surplus ; whereas the 
 nine North Atlantic States in 1890 had an aggregate State debt of $25,140,357, 
 and the twelve North Central States $41,656,112. 
 
 The Casuist's Art. 
 
 These official figures do not bear out the claim of " One of the Foremost Writ- 
 ers in Canada," that " both State and Municipal indebtedness is lower on that 
 side of the line than on this." 
 
 But in the exercise of his gifts as a campaign writer for the Canada Farmer'g 
 Sun, there are many instances to show that he is a proficient in the iirt of lump- 
 ing many things together, and leading the reader to infer tJhat what is true in 
 the general is true also in the particular. lie describes conditions at Ottawa 
 and Quebec, and would have his Patron readers believe that they exist at To- 
 ronto also. He pictures abhorrent practices in the politics of half a century or 
 a century ago, and in a suggestive way, worthy of a prince of casuists, would 
 have it understood that they have survived to our day, and are exercised in 
 Ontario by Sir Oliver Mowat and the members of the Liberal party. ; ;^: ;■ 
 
 'f 
 
 * Scattered, broken and forfeited berths. 
 
 t Berths in Rainy River District. 
 
"COME EASY, GO EASY." 
 
 But to return to what " Cne of the Foremost Writers of Canada" says on 
 the subject of public expenditures here and in the United States : Is it true that 
 the State Legislatures do their work with " praiseworthy economy," and that 
 with us io Ontario it is a case of " Come easy, go easy," and that " the people 
 have no particular incentive to watch their rulers closely?" We have the 
 assertion of the Farvier''» Sun Foremost Writer for it, and he delights to in- 
 stance Michigan and Indiana as evidence of it. The former of these States 
 is as good as a Imnk to this ingenious campaigner, and he can draw at sight 
 upon it for illustrations of cheap government. 
 
 , Economies in Michioan. ». 
 
 Where a Governt)r is paid $1,000 a year, an Attorney-General $800, a State 
 Treasurer $1,000, and a Secretary of State $800, it is no wonder if a gifted 
 writer can grow eloquent over extravagance in Ontario, where Cabinet Minis- 
 ters are paid for their service at some rate not ridiculously below the salaries or 
 earnings of business and professional men. 
 
 But is it a desirable thing to cheapen the Local Governments of a Federal 
 Union in the eyes of the people ? Is impecuniosity in the payment of service 
 for the State a thing to be comaxended ? 
 
 It is well-known that one of the great issues of the Civil War in the United 
 States was the doctrine of state sovereignty. The people of the North asserted 
 the sovereignty of the Federal Government, and, as often happens, they went to 
 extremes with it, ' Their cause won, and ever since the State institutions have 
 been fading in importance in the eyes of the people. The drift is noticeable, and 
 the outlook is viewed with alarm by many of the best students of political af- 
 fairs in the United States. They foresee that with State Government weakened 
 and depreciated, an end must come to the Federal system ; and that with a cen- 
 tral authority supreme at Washington, the break-up of the Union must follow 
 with the sureness of fate. 
 
 The Foremost Writer of the Farmer's Sun knows what would follow here if 
 our Local Governments were blotted out. He knows that under a Legislative 
 Union, sUch as the late Sir John Macdonald favored, the Dominion would 
 crumble to pieces. Is that what he desires 1 If it is not, he cannot claim credit 
 for much sagacity. 
 
 The Fruits of Piiaiseworthy Economy. 
 
 But is the State of Michigan an example worthy of imitation in the expendi- 
 ture of public moneys f What are the fruits of its system of " praiseworthy 
 economy " in the payment of a wages' scale — salaries would not be a fitting term 
 to use — to its State officers. 
 
 Michigan has an area of 59,000 square miles, ot* less than one-third of Ontario. 
 Its expenditure last year was $3,470,000, against $3,9(»7,000 in Ontario, which 
 includes $573,000 for public buildings. Its salaries for State officers were $300,- 
 000. This includes the payment to judges, which is not given separately. But 
 it does not include various Commissions, Boards and Bureaus corresponding to 
 similar services in Ontario under the head of Civil Government, to whom were 
 paid more than $70,000. In Ontario the cost of Civil Government last year 
 was $241,621. 
 
 The penurious scale of wages paid to head officers of the State in Michigan 
 does not result therefor in praiseworthy economy after all. It is not conceivable 
 that it should, for men who respect and value themselves will not accept offices 
 which the State, by its own act, has branded as contemptible. ' And so, with in- 
 efficient men at the heads of departments there must be incompetence and mis- 
 management in every branch of the public service. 
 
 It 
 minist 
 the fol 
 that tl 
 
 I 
 
COMPARATIVE STATISTICS. 
 
 It would be tiresome U» go into the detnib of coinpariHon between public ad- 
 ministration in Ontario and States of the American Union, but the figures in 
 the following table will doubtless satisfy the Patrons and farmers of Ontario 
 that they will look in vain across the borders for their pattern or model in 
 governmental affairs. They furnish a complete answer to the assertions of the 
 Foremost Writer in the Canada Farmer'a iSun that in Ontario wehavet<M) many 
 legislators, or that the rate of public expenditure is too high, if States of the 
 American Union are to be taken as the standard. The statistics are from the 
 last official reports, and those of Ontario are placed first for facility of comparison. 
 
 1 States v. Ontakio. 
 
 No. of Area Population. Expenditure, 
 
 lie^slatora. Hq. M. ti 
 
 OnUrio 91 219,000 2,114,321 3,907,145 
 
 MaaaaobuMtti 280 8,315 2,238,943 12,660,967 
 
 Connecticut 273 4,990 746,268 2,361,967 
 
 New York 160 49,170 5,997,863 18,053,174 
 
 NewJerwjy 81 7,815 1,444,933 4772,745 
 
 Pennsylvania 254 45,215 5,258,014 13, . ' 065 
 
 Minnesota 150 83,365 1,301,826 4,1^. 407 
 
 WiiconBin 133 56,040 1,686,880 3,1*2:1,845 
 
 Michigan 132 58.916 2,093.889 3,470,451 
 
 Illinois 204 66 650 3,826,351 6,454.690 
 
 Indiana 150 36,350 2,192,401 6,71'. .660 
 
 Ohio 147 41,060 3,672,316 6,19o,229 
 
 Whence the Revenues Come. 
 
 The revenues of those States are derived chiefly from taxes levied upon Real 
 and Personal property, Collateral Inl. eritances, and Transportation, Insurance, 
 Telegraph, Telephone, Oas. Mining, Electric and other Companies, Business 
 Corporations and Banks. 
 
 The taxation of Companies has proved to be a source of revenue as <{ood as a 
 gold mine in several of the States, and in some cases enormous levies are made. 
 
 The Transportation Companies of New York paid into the State Treasury last 
 year $945,071.29,— the Manhattan Railway contributing $100,431, 71>, and the 
 New York Central and Hudson River Railway $214,898.36. 
 
 In Massachusetts the Corporations tax last year was $3,690,359.3", whereof 
 steam and street Railway Companies paid $1,829,223.83, Telegraph and Tele- 
 phone Companies $258,313.31, and Manufactories of metals and textile fabrics 
 $499,638.83. The Saving Banks of the State, upon a levy of one-half of one per 
 cent, on average deposits, paid to the Treasury last year $1,143,200.13, while the 
 National Banks paid in $1,094,353.29. 
 
 In Pennsylvania last year the National Banks paid to the State Treasury a 
 levy of $532,306.53, Foreign Insurance Companies $463,252.59, business licenses 
 $1,362,884.62, and corporations and limited partnerships $4,fi91,630..'")9, levied 
 partly onstock and partly on gross receipts, — the Pennsylvania Railroad Company 
 alone being taxed for $856,679.74. 
 
 In New York the real and personal property tax paid to the State Treasury 
 was $4,028,071.73, and the collateral inheritance, death tax or succession duties 
 $3,071,687.09. 
 
 In Massachusetts those two sources of revenue yielded $2,548,854.31, and in 
 Pennsylvania $4,626,943.07. ' 
 
 An Encouragement to Extravagance. 
 
 With such sources to draw upon for revenues, is it any wonder that the public 
 expenditures of the State Governments have grown to the enormous proportions 
 
 ■.? ;-^ 
 
 *'f - 
 
 ' Scattered, broken and forfeited berths. 
 
 + Berths in Rainy River District. 
 
10 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 shown by the foregoing table, as compared with Ontario t It is a veritable illus- 
 tration of " come easy, go easy." 
 
 The money goes back to the people again, it is true, just as it does in Ontario, 
 some of it for schools, some for charities, some for the administration of justice, 
 etc. But extravagance in public expenditure is always an evil, as the farmers 
 of Ontario have been taught to v,ueir cost by the Government at Ottawa ; and 
 neither " One of the Foremost Writers in Canada" nor the Canada Farmer's Sun 
 is likely to persuade them that things could be better managed in Ontario than 
 they are by borrowing a leaf from Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania or 
 even Michigan. 
 
 Our Cabinet syistera of Government is greatly to be preferred to the system 
 which obtains so generally over the lakes, where, instead of responsible heads of 
 Departments to direct affairs, the work is largely entrusted to • uncontrolled 
 Commissions, Boards and Bureaus running on to infinity. In Massachusetts 
 itself there Jire over forty Commissions doing administrative work. 
 
 in Pennsylvania last year the cost of legislation was $575,639.11, as against 
 $138,924.82 in Ontario ; in New York it was $795,037.16, and in Massachu- 
 setts $348,807.66. 
 
 Some Glaring Examples. 
 
 There are many curious items in the public accounts of those States which 
 would furnish food for reflection here if there was space to notice them. Among 
 these may be observed in Pennsylvania the payment of fees to the Secretary of 
 the Commonwealth "collected for his own use " of $12,332 in addition to his 
 stated salary of $4,000, besides many exti-as, and of commissions to the Attorney- 
 General " received for liis own use " oi $7,000 above his salary of $2,625. Then, 
 too, there is Indiana, where the Attorney-General in addition to a salary of . 
 $5,000, received last year in fees $15,81 1.87. 
 
 The Foremost Writer would give his right hand were such items as these to 
 be found in the Public Accounts of Ontario, under the name of Sir Oliver 
 Mowat or any one of his colleagues. Yet the Canada Farmer's Sun gives the 
 free use of its columns to this literary gentleman, so that he may exercise his 
 brilliant gifts in persuading the Patrons of Ontario that it is their duty to join 
 hands with him in Americanizing our institutions. 
 
 COMPARISON WITH ONTAPtIO MUNICIPALITIES. 
 
 It has been shown that in the case of State Governments in the United 
 States direct taxation does not of itself ensure economy in the expenditure of 
 public moneys. An enquiry into the finances of municipalities in Ontario will 
 also show that it does not ensure economy here ; or perhaps it would be more 
 correct to say, an economy of public moneys as careful as is exhibited in the 
 finances of the Province 
 
 For the purposes of this enquiry the Reports of the Bureau of Industries may 
 be consulted, in particular, those of 1886 and 1893. >Statistics of taxation for 
 municipalities of the Province are available for the twenty years, 1873-92, and 
 complete statistics of receipts, expenditure, assets and liabilities for the five 
 years, 1886-90. 
 
 Municipal and Provincial Revenues. 
 
 The following table gives the revenues of all municipalities levied by dii-ect 
 tax on real and personal property and income, in the years 1873 and 189'.', for 
 municipal and school purposes, and also the revenues of the Provincial Govern 
 ni.ent from all sources for the same years : 
 
 The Municipalities. The Province. 
 
 1873 $5,605,779 $2,961,616.31 
 
 ,j, •; , 1892 11,808,959 4,662,9'U.67 
 
 Increase $6,203,180 
 
 $1,701,406.26 
 
 — : — -rf/«^(» 
 
 / , V 
 
11 
 
 than 
 
 t 
 
 I 
 
 The growth of the Province in this period of twenty years is indicated by the 
 increase in the number of ratepayers, which, in 1873, was 360,712, and in 1892, 
 580,255, a gain of 61 per cent. The increase in the amount of direct taxes col- 
 lected by the municipalities in the same period was 110| per cent., while the in- 
 crease in the revenues of the Province was only f)7h per cent, or less than the 
 increase of ratepayers. But while the revenues of the Province in 1892 were 
 ;|4, 662,921. 57, the expenditure was only $4,068,257.39, leaving a surplus of 
 nearly $600,000. 
 
 Clearly, then, it has not been a case of " Come easy, go easy " in this com 
 parison, in so far ps the Government of the Province is concerned ; and once 
 more, the assumptions and reasonings of the Foremost Writer are shown to be 
 at fault. 
 
 Revenue and Expenditure. 
 
 A more complete comparison is possible between the municipalities and the 
 Province for the years 1886 and 1890, covering a period of five years. 
 
 1. As to revenue. The ordinary revenue of municipalities in the following 
 table includes municipal and school taxes, licenses, fees, tolls, rents, tines, etc., 
 and the revenue of the Province is from all sources — 
 
 The Municipalities. The Province. 
 
 •1886.' $10,0G0,:ill $3,148,660.01 
 
 1890 12,433,237 3,423,154.99 
 
 Increaae $2,372,920 $274,494.98 
 
 2. As to cost of government. In the next table civil government and legis- 
 lation are grouped for the Province, and the various items of attendance at meet- 
 ings, allowances, salaries, printing, cure of buildings, etc., for municipalities — 
 the same services, as nearly as possible, for each. 
 
 The Municipnlitieg. The Province. 
 
 1886 $1,761,361 $298,661.78 
 
 1890 2.35:5,245 341,039.74 
 
 Increase $591,884 $42,377.96 
 
 3. As to public works. These include, for the municipalities, roads, bridges, 
 streets, parks, drainage works and construction of buildings and other works ; 
 and for the Province, repairs and maintenance of public buildings a' d con- 
 struction of colonization roads, public buildings and works, including the new 
 Parliament ■ buildings, which in the last year is comparatively a large item. 
 
 The Municipalities. The Province. 
 
 1886 $3,283,179 $490,640.41 
 
 1890 5,917,001 818,840.40 
 
 Increase $2,623,822 $328,199.99 
 
 4. As to total receipts and expenditure. These for the municipalities inchide 
 several cross entries, such as payments from local to county municipalities, and 
 the borrowing and refunding of moneys for current expenses ; but allowance 
 being made for them, the actual increases are very nearly as shown. For the 
 Province they are the totals as given in the public accounts. 
 
 Receipts. The Municipalities. The Province. 
 
 1886 $20,277,307 $3,148 660.01 
 
 - 1&90 27,753,411 3,423,154.99 
 
 Increase $7,476,104 $274,494 98 
 
 Sxpfnditttret. 
 
 1886 $19,125,999 $3,181,449.69 
 
 1890 26,391,568 3,896 324.38 
 
 Increase $ifi2t)5,569 $714,874.69 
 
 m 
 
 - : •■/■• 
 
 X*r,; 
 
 in 
 
 
 ' Scattered, broken and forfeited berths. 
 
 t Berths in Rainy River District. 
 
/ 
 
 12 
 
 The increases of the municipalities are seen to be very much greater than those 
 of the Province, although their revenue has been derived largely from direct 
 taxes. But they have also been borrowing freely, and in the five years 1886-90 
 their debenture debt, less sinking fund and other investments (net debt), was 
 increased by $8,683,090, or from $23,710,459 to $32,393,549 ; while their float- 
 ing debt was increased by $2,913,564, or from $1,868,521 to $4,782,085. The 
 Province is without debt ; it has a surplus of $6,135,480.49. 
 
 Where the Proverb Fails. 
 
 The Foremost Writer's proverb of " Come easy, go easy," is generally true ; 
 but it does not apply to the Government of Ontario. That Government, it has 
 been shown, has administered the finances of the Province with much greater 
 economy than any State of the American Union, where the bulk of the revenues 
 are derived from direct taxes. It has been more-economical than our own muni- 
 cipalities, whose chief source of revenue is direct taxes also. The Government of 
 Sir Oliver Mowat is therefore on this ground justly entitled to the confidence 
 of the electors of the Province. The moneys and resources with which it has 
 lieen entrusted have been carefully and prudently utilized ; and while aid has 
 been generously given for education, the maintenance of public institutions, 
 agriculture, hospitals and charities, railways and the construction of colonization 
 roads and public buildings and works, it cannot with a shadow of good cause be 
 alleged that either the money or the resources of the Province have been for any 
 purpose wasted or improperly spent. 
 
 The. world can be challenged to show a better Government. 
 
 THE MESSAGE 10 THE FARMERS. 
 
 " One of the Foremost Writers in Canada,'' in addressing the Patrons through 
 the medium of the Canada Farmer's Suv, may be supposed to have a special 
 message for the farmers of Ontario. His main object is, to show that the 
 Liberal Government is not worthy of their confidence. A suificient answer is, 
 what this Government has done for the cause of agriculture. 
 
 The Government's Agricultural Record. 
 
 It has created a Department of Agriculture with a successful farmer as 
 Minister. 
 
 It has spent $2,731,310 in connection with agriculture in 22 years. 
 
 It has collected and published farm statistics for the past 1 2 years, and these 
 statistics have established the pre-eminence of the Province on this continent as 
 an agricultural country. 
 
 It has established the Agricultural College and Experimental Farm. 
 
 It has organized and assisted 87 Farmers' Institutes. 
 
 It gives grants to 90 electoral district and 357 township and horticultural 
 societies. 
 
 From 1872 to 1893 it gave $1,336,793 for agricultural societies. 
 
 It gave $20,550 in 1893 to twelve other associations organized for the benefit 
 of farmers, chief of which are the Dairvmen's Associations. 
 
 It has established a fund for loaning money to farmers on easy terms for tile- 
 draining their lands, from which the farmers of the Province have drawn $1,057,- 
 454 87 in 21 years. 
 
 It has sent out travelling dairies which have visited 669 placet^ in three years. 
 
 It has started a special dairy school at Guelph at which 103 attended in the 
 spring of 1894, and a special summer course for rural public school teachers at 
 the Agricultural College. 
 
 It provided for the display of agricultural products at the World's Fair, where 
 in fruits, grain, live stock and cheese Ontario beat the world. 
 
 y-t"»<f 
 
13 
 
 It distributed 166,000 reports in 1893 and 1,200,000 bulletins in the past 
 three years. ^ 
 
 It will shortly establish experimental fruit farms. 
 
 It manufactures at the Central Prison a high quality of binder twine, which 
 is sold direct to the farmers at low prices. 
 
 One thousand four hundred and thirty-four awards in agriculture were taken 
 at the "World's Fair, out of a total of 1,685 for Canada, or 85 percent., — a most 
 convincing proof of the usefulness of the Government's policy in encouraging 
 agriculture to reach a higher standard. 
 
 SOME MINOR ISSUES. 
 
 The Canada Farmer's Sun has used its Foremost Writer in making attacks 
 upon the Government of this Province on various other grounds, some of which 
 may be noticed briefly. To all of them a complete answer could be given. 
 
 :. . / .. Biennial Sessions. 
 
 1. As to Biennial Sessions. They are out of harmony with our system of Re- 
 sponsible Government, which requires that Ministers should give the people and 
 their representatives in the Legislature the best opportunities to judge of their 
 administrative acts. The security of Provincial Rights in our Federal system 
 also requires that the importance and dignity of the Local Legislature be main-' 
 tained. In the United States, since the Civil war, the State Legislatures are 
 slowly sinking into insignificance. Besides, it is to be understood that Patron 
 policy on this issue was correctly voiced by the Patron representative in the Local 
 Legislature, who voted last session against Mr. Meredith's motion in favor of 
 Biennial Sessions. 
 
 Appointments to Office. » 
 
 2. As to appointments to otfice. " One of the Foremost Writers in Canada," 
 writing to the Patrons, would deny to any person who has served in the Legis- 
 lature the right afterward to hold a public otfice. The fact that a man has been 
 deemed worthy by the people to represent them in Parliament, is evidence of his 
 ability to till a public position. He at least should not be proscribed, unless it 
 can be shown that the practice has grown into an evil. Edward Blake once 
 oflfered a resolution on the subject in the Local Legislature, but that was to pro- 
 test against the appointment of a member, direct from his seat in the Legisla- 
 ture to an office in his own constituency, and presumably upon his own advice. 
 No case of that sort has occurred since, and out of a total of 307 members who 
 have sat in the Ontario Legislature since 1872, only 42 have been appointed to 
 office, or one in seven. 
 
 The Fees Question. 
 
 3. As to payment by fees. Registrars, Sheriffs and Bailiffs are not performing 
 a general service. They are not in the employment of the people as Cabinet 
 Ministers and most other Government officers are. The men who buy and sell 
 lands, or who have suits at court, are the ones who require the service of Regis- 
 trars, Sheriffs and Bailiffs ; and it is those men, not the public, who should pay 
 for the service. Doctors and lawyers are also paid by fees, and they as well as 
 legal officers would doubtless prefer to be put on salary and draw their earnings 
 from the municipal treasury. Possibly some plan different from the existing 
 one may be devised and recommended by the Royal Commission now sitting ; 
 but it s«ems to be just and reasonable that those who use the service of Regis- 
 trars, Sheriffs and Bailiffs should pay for it. There are thousands of farmers in 
 the Province who never require the offices of a Sheriff or Bailiff, and who never 
 more than perhaps once in a lifetime get a title recorded in the office of a 
 Registrar. 
 
 Scattered, broken and forfeited berths. 
 
 f Berths in Rainy River iJietrict. 
 
14 
 
 The Chargb op Nepotism. 
 
 4. As to the charge of nepotism. The citizens of Ontario who know the 
 eminent services of feir Oliver Mowat to the Province during the last forty years, 
 and especially during the twenty-two years in which he has held the office of 
 First Minister and Attorney -General, are not likely to share the feelings of "One 
 of the Foremost Writers in Canada," in condemning the appointment of Sir 
 Oliver's son to an office. 
 
 The man who won tor Ontario half of her present teri'itory, a hundred 
 thousand square miles, who by wise policy has developed her great natural re- 
 sources, and who has successfully maintained her cause against encroachments 
 of the Federal Government for nearly a quarter of a century, would be readily 
 pardoned by the people of Ontario had he been guilty of the charge made in the 
 Canada Fanwr's Sun. 
 
 In Great Britain it is the custom to reward distinguished public servants 
 with noble titles and rich gifts. 
 
 Sir Oliver Mowat has been content to take the modest salary of his office as 
 the only compensation for his many and valuable services t'^ his Province in the 
 courts and elsewhere, although as a lawyer in private practice he might have 
 earned double or treble the salary paid to him as Attorney-General. 
 
 Tt is well known thac he is not wealthy, and that with the numerous calls 
 .made upon one in his position, he can hope to save little out of his official 
 salary. Yet he did not seek or claim for his son the office concerning which 
 so much ungrateful criticism has been heard. 
 
 His political friends urged and pressed the appointment upon the other mem- 
 bers of the (xovernment at a time when the First Minister's health was not as 
 robust as it is now, and when other circumstances seemed to make it necessary 
 that provision should be made for his family. 
 
 These are delicate matters to refer to, and Sir Oliver Mowat himself would be 
 the last to let mention of them be made were he consulted on the subject. But 
 "One of the Foremost Writers in Canada," in the Canada Farmer's Sun, and 
 others elsewhere, have prostituted their talents in the effort to make the political 
 and personal character of Sir Oliver Mowat odious, and it has become necessary 
 to state the simple facts. 
 
 There is not a Tory in the United Kingdom despicable enough to reproach 
 Mr. Gladstone for giving to his son a seat in his own Cabinet. Nor is there a 
 Liberal vile enough to taunt Lord Salisbury with giving high office and 
 leadership of his party in the Commons to his gifted nephew, Mr. A. .J. 
 Balfour. It has been reserved for the Canada Farmer's Sun and its chief 
 political writer in the present election contest to strike such a blow at the 
 Grand Old Man of Ontario. 
 
 For his services as military leader within the four years preceding the Water- 
 loo campaign, the British Government conferi'ed upon Sir Arthur Wellesley 
 (Duke of Wellington) the sucessive dignities of baron, viscount, earl, marquis 
 and duke ; and when the First Minister proposed to endow the dukedom with 
 a sum of £300,000, the House of Commons under the guidance of the leaders 
 of the Opposition raised it by acclamation to half a million— about $2,500,000. 
 It was " the noblest gift that any subject had ever received," Wellington him- 
 self said, when returning his thanks in person to the House for the honor. 
 
 After the abolition of the Corn Laws in Great Britain, Richard Cobden, lead- 
 er of the Anti-Corn Laws movement, was presented with a national testimonial of 
 nearly eighty thousand pounds stei'ling. " He had undoubtedly sacrificed good 
 chances of private prosperity for the interest of the community," biographer 
 John Morley says, "and it would have been a painful and discreditable satire on 
 human nature if he had b^en left in ruin, while everybody around him was 
 thriving on the results of his unselfish devotion." 
 
 The services of Oliver Mowat to his native Province during the last twenty- 
 
 where 
 
 if/rmm 
 
 
15 
 
 two years will bear just comparison with those of Wellington or Cobden to tlie 
 Mother Land. The ability and the earnestness with which he defended our 
 rights to the disputed territory against the aggressions of the Dominion Govern- 
 ment, and his final victory before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, 
 which established Ontario's rights over a region 100,000 square miles in extent, 
 rich in timber and minerals, and containing extensive areas of fine farming land, 
 are surely deserving of grateful recognition by the people of Ontario. Had he 
 been a military commander, and had he won those vast and rich possessions by 
 the power of the sword, there is no honor in the gift of the British Crown which 
 he might not hope to have received for his reward. But he did not receive even 
 a lawyer's fee. His great abilities as a lawyer and hi8*^atriotism as a statesman 
 were freely given to the service' of his country ; and his only reward is the con- 
 sciousness that he has the confidence of the -people. 
 
 '\W^^ 
 
 I 
 
 THE OPINIONS OF PRINCIPAL GRANT. 
 
 The opinions of Rev. Principal Grant, of Kingston, on the issues now before 
 the electors of Ontario deserve to be well pondered by the farmers as well as 
 by electors of every class. Principal Grant is a man of commanding force ; 
 and, as an independent man, who in politics, as in other affairs, has the courage 
 to follow his intellect, his judgment will have weight with all thoughtful, inde- 
 pendent and patiiotic men. Here are the opinions of Rev. Principal Grant: 
 
 The Man in Charge of the Strong Box. 
 
 " The one point that our people everywhere must settle is this : Can we get admin- 
 istrators who are determined that the commandment ' Thou shalt not steal ' must be 
 observed ? Till that is settled, it is useless to talk about anything else. Provincial 
 rights, school questions, tariff reform, British connection, canuls, cables, railways — 
 what is the use of discussing these if we sink into being a nation of thieves ? That is 
 what we must become if we tolerate stealing in high places, for what is done at the top 
 is sure to permeate tr ..he bottom. Look at the revelations that we have had since 
 1891 — corruption in so many quarters that we wondered if there was a clean spot any- 
 where ; the people of Quebec robbed that M. Pacaud and his friends might have the 
 joy of exploiting what he termed a gold mine ! The people of all the Provinces 
 robbed that the robbers might rule Canada ! A recent instance is enough to show 
 how deep and wide-spread the roots of the malady are, and to show how hard it 
 is for a Government to act, even with good intentions, unless supported by a 
 healthy public opinion. Two worthy gentlemen were convicted and sentenced to 
 gaol. Prison disagreed with them, and they were set free. One is about offering him- 
 self as a candidate for Parliament : the other was taken from prison as a conquering 
 hero. In Montreal, 'fine gentlemen received him at the railway station with cheers, 
 took him to the Windsor and dined and wined him. He, in reply, said not a word 
 about ill-health, but declared that the people would not allow the Government to keep 
 him in prison any longer ! When convicts get such treatment, ordinary men will not 
 be much disinclined to be classed among convicts. As we think of the saturnalia that 
 must have existed for a long time before such a state of public morals could become 
 possible, we are forced to ask what might have happened to the richest Province in 
 the Dominion if any easy-going politician had had charge of its strong box. What 
 plunder there was for a gang ! We have timber limits worth tens of millions ; we 
 could stand a debt of twenty or thirty millions as easily as Quebec. A politician of 
 easy virtue would have lavished these millions on heelers and hangers-on, who, in re- 
 turn, would be enthusiastically voting him a god. Does not this thought throw some 
 light on what we have escaped, and on what we owe to the man who has been in 
 charge of our strong box for twenty-two years. Assuredly the revelations have had 
 that effect upon me. Our money is mill ours, and our honor is safe. 
 Thank Oud for It, and also let ns keep our powder dry— that is, 
 keep a good seivant at his post. A man who will not read this lesson will 
 not read anything. In one word, Ontario cannot afford to disiniss Sir 
 Oliver Mowat." 
 
 British Connection, 
 
 " There is, however, another reason for voting for him that appeals to men who be- 
 lieve that British connection is indispensable to the growth of Canadian nationality. 
 
 • Scattered, broken and forfeited berths. 
 
 t Berths in Rainy River District. 
 
i 
 
 M 
 
 Mr. Mowst wai slwajs loyal, bat in the iMt two or thre* jmn he hae t«ken a dedd^ 
 pnUie stand that ha« oqct him lome followem, and that, in my opinion, should wfai for 
 him tirioe a« many. His aooeplanoe of Jioncr from the Qaeen — and it is clear to me 
 that, as a rule, politieians should neither seek nor refuse such honors— his Niagara 
 speeeh, his diimiisal of an official who defied him on a point of duty inToUed in his 
 office to the Orown, these things should not be forgotten. When D' Alton McCarthy . 
 said, * Though Sir Oliver Mowat has lost Elgin Myers, he has gained Mr. McOarthy, ' 
 a good many added individually, 'and me too.' In one word, those aen 
 
 ,who are In flivor of Biitltli connootlon oannot afford to dlamlss Sir 
 
 ' Ollwer Howat.'' 
 
 P. P. A. Support op Mb. Mbbidith. 
 
 *' I cannot help saying here that I wonder a little that Mr. Meredith does not speak 
 out what he must feel with regard to the P. P.- A. He might lose Totes on this occa- 
 sion by so doing, but he would gain in the long run. A brief ieniflre of office is not 
 what such a man desires, but a permanent place jn the respect of his 'countrymen. 
 Surely it is clear that there can be no such a thing as Oonsenratism in Canada, in any 
 sense of the word, that is not based on a good understanding between our two great 
 religious denominations. Coquetting with such an association, or even silently accept- 
 ing its aid, must be fatal to him. It may be said that he is not coquetting. No, but 
 the receiver is as bad as jthe thief. Such allies must have their price, and they are 
 sure to act as h boomerang. I would tike to hear from both leaders a distinct repudia- 
 tion and denunciation 'of any oi^anization that is based on the proscription of any 
 class of our people on religious grounds. We need a union of all good men in Canada, 
 and we dare not say to any man .that he must abandon the religion of his mother 
 before he can be expected to be treated as a citizen. On this third grourfd, 
 then, I say, we otinnot afford to dispense with the services of Sir 
 Oliver nowat.** .^ 
 
 IJ H UBWI II I I II M ill , IWUdmWMUWWUIMIWJ i 
 
 F- 
 
 ( if 
 
mm 
 
 did win for 
 sImt to ms 
 it Niagam 
 Ived in hia 
 MoOarkhy 
 MoOarthy, 
 oce men 
 ■miM Mr 
 
 not speak 
 1 this oooa- 
 Soe is not 
 ant^men. 
 da, in any 
 
 two great 
 tly aooept- 
 No, bnfc 
 d they are 
 3t repadia* 
 ion of any 
 in Canada, 
 is mother 
 grourfd, 
 • of Sir 
 
 
 
 / 
 
 I •^vtvua tu xtNUUjf XblVOl' LflOtriCt.