^, 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 // 
 
 ^ >^ 
 
 V,'<^ 
 
 ^ 4l 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 L;|2.8 |2.5 
 W 1^ |2.2 
 
 •« |40 
 
 ■u Mb 
 
 2.0 
 
 1.8 
 
 11.25 i 1.4 i 1.6 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions 
 
 Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 1980 
 
Technical NotM / Notes techniques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Physical 
 features of this copy which may alter any of the 
 images in the reproduction are checked below. 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couvertures de couleur 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes giographiques en couleur 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm* le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a At* possible de se procurer. Certains 
 dAfauts susceptibles de nuire A la qualit* de la 
 reproduction sont notis ci-dessous. 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Coloured plates/ 
 Planches en couleur 
 
 Tl 
 
 P< 
 of 
 
 fil 
 
 Tl 
 c< 
 
 01 
 
 •f 
 
 Tl 
 fil 
 in 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d6color4es, tacheties ou piquies 
 
 Tight binding (may cause shadows or 
 distortion along interior margin)/ 
 Reliure serr* (peut causer de I'ombre ou 
 de la distortion le long de la marge 
 intdrieure) 
 
 
 
 D 
 
 Show through/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagtes 
 
 M 
 in 
 
 ur 
 be 
 fo 
 
 El 
 
 Additional comments/ 
 Commentaires suppi4mentaires 
 
 Fold-out maps, charts, etc., may be filmed at a different reduction 
 ratio than the rest of the boolc 
 
 Bibliographic Notes / Notes bibliographiques 
 
 □ 
 
 n 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Pagination incorrect/ 
 Erreurs de pagination 
 
 Pages missing/ 
 Des pages manquent 
 
 D 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 D 
 
 Maps missing/ 
 
 Des cartes g6ographiquas manquent 
 
 n 
 
 Plates missing/ 
 
 Des planches manquent 
 
 D 
 
 Additional comments/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires 
 
re 
 lins 
 la 
 
 The images appearing liere are the best quaiity 
 possibie considering the condition and iegibility 
 of the original copy and in Iceeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall 
 contain the symbol — ► (meaning CONTINUED"), 
 or the symbol y (meaning "END"), whichever 
 applies. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 4t4 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at 
 de la netteti de I'exemplaire filmA, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparattra sur la der- 
 nlAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: 
 le symbole — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbols 
 y signifie "FIN". 
 
 The original copy was borrowed from, and 
 filmed with, the kind consent of the following 
 institution: 
 
 Library of the Public 
 
 Archives of Canada 
 
 Maps or plates too large to be entirely included 
 in one exposure are filmed beginning in the 
 upper left hand corner, left to right and top to 
 bottom, as many frames as required. The 
 following diagrams illustrate the method: 
 
 L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce A la 
 g^nirositA de ritabiissement prAteur 
 suivant : 
 
 La bibiiothique des Archives 
 
 publiques du Canada 
 
 Les cartes ou les planches trop grandes pour Atre 
 reproduites en un seui clich6 sont fiimtes it 
 partir de I'angle supArieure gauche, de gauche A 
 droite et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nicessaire. Le dipgramme suivant 
 illustre la m^thode : 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
I 
 1 
 
 I 
 I 
 I 
 I 
 I 
 I 
 
 B 
 

 A Brief History from Official Sources of the Legisla- 
 tion respecting Separate Schools since the year 
 1863 in the United Province of Canada, and in the 
 Dominion since Confederation. 
 
 See page IJt, giving dbsiract of debates in both Houses, in year 1875, ivhen a 
 Constitution was granted to the North-west Territories. 
 
 From Assembly Journals, Pages 96 to 130 — 6th March, 1863 — 
 
 AS Follows: — 
 
 The Order of the Day for the second reading of the Bill to amend an Act 
 respecting Separate Schools in Upper Canada, in so far as the same relates 
 to Roman Catholic Schools, being read; 
 
 Mr. Scott moved, seconded by Mr. McCann, and the Question being 
 proposed, that the Bill be now read a second time; 
 
 Mr, Bnrwell moved, in amendment to the Question, seconded by Mr. 
 Mackenzie, that the word 'now' be left out and the words 'this day six 
 mouths ' added at the end thereof. 
 
 And the Question being put on the amendment, the House divided: and 
 the name^ being called for, they were taken down, as follow : — 
 
 Yeas : 
 
 , ■■ ' ' , 
 
 - 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 Bell (North Lanark) 
 
 , Dunsford, 
 
 McKellar, 
 
 Biggar, 
 
 Ferguson, 
 
 Morrii, 
 
 Burwell, 
 
 Haultain, 
 
 Mowat, 
 
 Cameron, Matthew Hooper, 
 
 Munro, 
 
 Cockbum, 
 
 Jones, 
 
 Notman, 
 
 Dickson, 
 
 Mackenzie, 
 
 Pope, 
 
 Nays: 
 Messieurs 
 
 Alleyn, 
 
 Clarke, 
 
 Laframboise, 
 
 Anderson, 
 
 Cowan, 
 
 Lanpevin, 
 
 Archambault, 
 
 Crawford, 
 
 Macdonald, J. A., 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Daly, 
 
 Macdonald, 
 
 Baby, 
 
 Dawson, 
 
 J. S. A. G., 
 
 Beaubien, 
 
 Desaulniera, 
 
 Macdonald, 
 
 Beaudreau, 
 
 Dorion, J. B. E 
 
 ., Donald A., 
 
 Bell (Ruaaell), 
 
 Dostaler, 
 
 McCann, 
 
 Benjamin, 
 
 Dufresne, Alex. 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 Benoit, 
 
 Dufresne, Joseph, McQee, 
 
 Blanchet, 
 
 Dunkin, 
 
 MoLachlin, 
 
 5869—1 
 
 
 
 mt 
 
 ma. 
 
 Scatcherd, 
 Scoble, 
 Smith, and 
 Stirton.— 22. 
 
 Robinson, 
 Robitaille, 
 Rose, 
 Ross, J. J. 
 
 (Champlain), 
 Ross, J. S. (Dundaa), 
 Rykert, 
 Scott, 
 Sherwood, 
 Sicotte, A. G., 
 Simard, j 
 
T 
 
 Bouraflsa, 
 
 Bown, 
 
 Brousset'u, 
 
 Buchauaii, 
 
 Cameron, John H. 
 
 Carling, 
 
 Caron, 
 
 Cartier, 
 
 Cauchon, 
 
 Chnpais, 
 
 Evanturel, 
 
 Foley, 
 
 For tier, 
 
 Fournier, 
 
 Gaudet, 
 
 Harcourt, 
 
 Hebort, 
 
 Huot, 
 
 Kierzkow8ki, 
 
 Labreche, 
 
 Mong^nais, 
 
 Morin, 
 
 Morrison, 
 
 O'Halloran, 
 
 Patrick, 
 
 Poupore, 
 
 Powell, 
 
 Price, 
 
 Rnnkin, 
 
 Kcmillard, 
 
 Simpeon, 
 
 Sonierville, 
 
 Street, 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 Tnschereau, 
 
 Tassfi, 
 
 Wallbridge, 
 
 Walsh, and 
 
 Wilson.— 80. 
 
 So it passea in the negative. 
 
 Then, the maJn Question being put, the House divided; and the naujos 
 \)eing called for, w>^re taken down, as follow: — 
 
 Yeas : 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 Alleyn, 
 
 Anderson, 
 
 Archambault, 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Baby, 
 
 Beaubien, 
 
 Bell (Russell), 
 
 Benjamin, 
 
 Benoit, , 
 
 Blunchet, 
 
 Bourassa, 
 
 Bown, 
 
 Brousseau, 
 
 Buchanan, 
 
 Cameron, John H,. 
 
 Carling, 
 
 Caron, 
 
 Cartier, 
 
 Cauchon, 
 
 Chapais, 
 
 Chrke, 
 
 Co\/an, 
 
 Crawford, 
 
 Daly, 
 
 Dawaon, 
 
 Dcrion, J. B. E., 
 
 Do.'stuler, 
 
 Dufrcsne, Alex., 
 
 Dufresne, Jos., 
 
 Dunkin, 
 
 Evanturel, 
 
 Foley, 
 
 Fortier, 
 
 Fournitr, 
 
 Gaudet, 
 
 Harcourt, 
 
 Hebert, 
 
 Huot, 
 
 Kierzkowski, 
 
 Labreche-Viger, 
 
 Laframboise, 
 
 Laiigevin, 
 
 Macdonald, John 
 
 Mncdouald, J.S.A 
 
 AlcCann, 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 McGee, 
 
 McLachlin, 
 
 Mongenais, 
 
 Morin, 
 
 Morrison, 
 
 O'Halloran, 
 
 Patrick, 
 
 Poupore, 
 
 Powell, 
 
 Price, 
 
 Rankin, 
 
 Remillard, 
 
 Robinson, 
 
 Robitaille, 
 
 Rose, 
 A., Ross, J. J. 
 Ci., (Champlain), 
 
 Ross, J. S. (Dundas), 
 
 Seott, 
 
 Sherwood, 
 
 Sicotte, Atty. Gen., 
 
 Simard, 
 
 Simpson, 
 
 Sonierville, 
 
 Street, 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 Ta&chereau, 
 
 Tasse, 
 
 Wallbridge, 
 
 Walsh, and 
 
 Wilson— 80. 
 
 Nays; 
 
 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Bell (No. Lanark), 
 
 Dunsford, 
 
 McKellar, 
 
 Scatcherd, 
 
 Biggar, 
 
 Ferguson, 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Scoble, 
 
 Burwell, 
 
 Haultain, 
 
 Mowat, 
 
 Smith, and 
 
 Cameron, M. C, 
 
 Hooper, 
 
 Munro, 
 
 Slirton— 22 
 
 Cockbum, 
 
 Jones, 
 
 Notman, 
 
 
 Dickson, 
 
 Mackenzie, 
 
 Pope, 
 
 
 So it was resolved in the Affirmative. 
 
 The Bill was accordingly read a second time, and referred to a Select 
 Committee composed of Mr. Scott, the Honourable Mr. Attorney' -General J. 
 
 A 
 E 
 B 
 I] 
 I! 
 B 
 C 
 C 
 D 
 
 A 
 A 
 
J 
 
 S. Macdonakl, the Honourable John A. Macuonaki, Mr. Clarke and Mr. 
 McCann, lo report thereon with all convenient speed ; with power to send for 
 persons, papers and records. 
 
 It will be observed tlmt an Upper Canada majority voted for the second read- 
 ing of the Bill — twenty of these may be classed as C^onservativea and sixteen as 
 Liberals. Nearly all the meml)er9 of the Liberal administration -supported the 
 Bill, including the premier, the Honourable J. S. Maedonald. The Bill was also 
 supported by the leader of the Opposition, the late Sir John A. Mncdonnld, and 
 the Ieadin(;c members of the Conservative party, including the Ilonourablo John 
 Hilyard Cameron, Mr. Benjamin, then (Jlrand Master of the Orange Order, and 
 Mr. Anderson, Grand Treasurer of the Order. 
 
 12th Maecii, 18G3. 
 
 The Order of the Day for the third reading of the Bill to amend ' An 
 Act re(specting Separate Schools ' in Upper Canada, in so far as the same 
 relates to Roman Catholic Schools, being read : 
 
 Mr. Scott moved, seconded by Mr. McCann, and the question being pro- 
 posed, that the Bill be now read the third time; 
 
 Mr. D. A. Maedonald moved, in amendment, seconded by Mr. Biggar, 
 that all the words after ' now ' to the end of the question be left out, and 
 the words ' recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House for the purpose 
 of adding the following words at the end of the second section : — " Provided 
 always, that no such Separate Schools shall be established in any Township, 
 unless the Roman Cntbolic residents therein constitute the ' minority ' of the 
 inhabitants of such School Section," inserted instead thereof.' 
 
 And the Question being put on the amendment, the House divided: and 
 the names being called for, they were taken down, as follow: — 
 
 Yeas : 
 
 ect 
 J. 
 
 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Dunsford, 
 
 ^fcKellar, 
 
 Scoble, 
 
 Bell (North Lanark) 
 
 , Ferguson, 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Simpson, 
 
 Bell (Russell), 
 
 llarcourt, 
 
 Mowat, 
 
 Smith, 
 
 Biggar, 
 
 Ilaultain, 
 
 Munro, 
 
 Somerville, 
 
 Bown, 
 
 Hooper, 
 
 Not man, 
 
 Stirton, 
 
 Burwell, 
 
 Jackson, 
 
 Pope, 
 
 Street, 
 
 Cockburn, 
 
 Jones, 
 
 Ross, J. S. 
 
 (Dundas) White, and 
 
 Cowan, 
 
 Maedonald, Donald A. Rymal, 
 
 Wright.— 36. 
 
 Dunkin, 
 
 Mackenzie, 
 
 Scateherd, 
 
 
 . -, ;• 
 
 ■ 
 
 Nays: 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Abbott, 
 
 Daly, 
 
 Huot, 
 
 Powell, 
 
 Alleyn, 
 
 Daoust, 
 
 Jobin, 
 
 Prevost, 
 
 5869— li 
 
 
 
 
7 
 
 Anderson, 
 
 Dawson, 
 
 Joly, 
 
 
 Price, 
 
 Archanibault, 
 
 Denis, 
 
 Kierzkowski 
 
 > 
 
 llemillard, 
 
 Baby, 
 
 Dt'Havdniers, 
 
 Labri'chc-Viger, 
 
 Kobitaille, 
 
 Bcaubien, 
 
 Durion, A. A., 
 
 La framboise 
 
 > 
 
 Ruse. 
 
 Beaudreau, 
 
 Dorion, J. B. E., 
 
 Langevin, 
 
 
 ]{o8a, J. J. 
 
 Benoit, 
 
 Doataler, 
 
 Macdonald, 
 
 John A. 
 
 , (Champlain), 
 
 Blanthet, 
 
 Drumraond, 
 
 Macdonald, 
 
 J.S.A.G 
 
 . Hyerson, 
 
 Bourafisa, 
 
 Dufresne, Alex., 
 
 McCann, 
 
 
 Rykert, 
 
 Brou9?eau, 
 
 Dufresne, Jos., 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 
 Scott, 
 
 Buchanan, 
 
 Evanturel, 
 
 Mc(k't'. 
 
 
 Sherwood, 
 
 Cftineron, John H., 
 
 Foley. 
 
 MoLnchlin, 
 
 
 Sicotte, Atty. G 
 
 Cnrling, 
 
 Fortier, 
 
 Mongenais, 
 
 
 Himard, 
 
 Cnron, 
 
 Foiirnicr, 
 
 Morin, 
 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 Cartier, 
 
 Oagnon, 
 
 ^forrison. 
 
 
 Tnss^, 
 
 Cnuchon, 
 
 ridudct. 
 
 Mcrton, 
 
 
 Trtt. 
 
 Chapais, 
 
 ITebert, 
 
 O'lTnlloran, 
 
 
 Walsh, and 
 
 Clarke, 
 
 ■Rowland, 
 
 Pat'-ick, 
 
 
 Wright.— 78. 
 
 Crawford, 
 
 Huntinpton, 
 
 Poiipore, 
 
 
 
 So it passed in the Negative. 
 
 And the Question being again proposed, that the Bill be now read the 
 third time; 
 
 The Honourable Mr. Cameron moved, in amendment to the Question, 
 seconded by Mr. Anderson, That all the words after * now ' to the end of the 
 Question, be left out, and the words * recommitted to a Committee of the 
 Whole House for the purpose of amending the thirteenth clause, by leaving 
 out the words " to grant certificates of qualification " in the third and fourth 
 lines, and insert the word *' appoint," and to add the word " only " at the 
 end of the said clause,' inserted instead thereof. 
 
 And a Debate arising thereupon, 
 
 The Honourable Mr. Sherwood moved, seconded by Mr. Dunkin, and the 
 Question being put. That this House do now adjourn, the House divided: — 
 Yeas, 35. Nays, 48. 
 
 So it passed in the Negative. 
 
 And the Question being again proposed on the amendment, and a further 
 Debate arising thereupon ; 
 
 Ordered, That the Debate be adjourned until to-morrow, and that it be 
 then the first Order of the Day. 
 
 The House resumed the adjourned Debate upon the amendment which 
 was yesterday proposed to be made to the Question, That the Bill (to amend 
 An Act respecting Separate Schools in Upper Canada, in so far as the same 
 relates to Koman Catholic Schools) be now read the third time; and which 
 amendment was. That all the words after * now ' to the end of the Question 
 be left out, and the words ' recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House 
 for the purpose of amending the thirteenth clause by leaving out the words 
 " to grant certificates of qualification " in the third and fourth lines, and 
 insert the word " appoint," and to add the word " only " at the end of the 
 said claiise,' inserted instead thereof. 
 
And the Question being put on the amendment, tin House divided 
 tlie names being called for, they were taken down, as follow : — 
 
 Yeas: 
 
 and 
 
 the 
 
 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Anderson, 
 
 Dickfon, 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 Scntchord, 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Dunkin, 
 
 McKollar, 
 
 Scoble, 
 
 Bell (North Lanark) Dunsford, 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Simpson, 
 
 15iKgar, 
 
 FerKUBon, 
 
 Morrison, 
 
 Smith, 
 
 J3o\vn, 
 
 I iarcourt, 
 
 Mowat, 
 
 Somerville, 
 
 lUirwell, 
 
 Tlaultain, 
 
 Munro, 
 
 Stirton, 
 
 Cameron, J. H., 
 
 Uooper, 
 
 Notnian, 
 
 Street, 
 
 (/urling, 
 
 Ilowland, 
 
 Pope, 
 
 Walsh, 
 
 (\K.'kburn, 
 
 Jackson, 
 
 Powell. 
 
 White, 
 
 Cownn, 
 
 Jones, 
 
 Ross. J. S. (Dundas; 
 
 ), Wilson and 
 
 Crawford, 
 
 Kniffht, 
 
 Eykert, 
 
 Wrig«ht.— 47. 
 
 Daly, 
 
 Mackenzie, 
 
 Rymal, 
 Nats: 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Abbott, 
 
 Dawson, 
 
 Huntington, 
 
 O'Halloran, 
 
 Alley n, 
 
 DeCazes, 
 
 liuot; 
 
 Patrick, 
 
 Archambault, 
 
 Denis, 
 
 Joly, 
 
 Poupore, 
 
 Baby, 
 
 Desaulniers, 
 
 Kierzkowski, 
 
 Prevoat, 
 
 Beaubien, 
 
 Dorion, A. A., 
 
 Labreche-Viger, 
 
 Price, 
 
 Beaudrcau, 
 
 Dorion, J. B. E 
 
 ., l.aframboise, 
 
 Remillard, 
 
 Bell (Russell), 
 
 Dostaler, 
 
 Langevin, 
 
 Rose, 
 
 Benoit, 
 
 Di'ummond, 
 
 "Macdonald, J. A., 
 
 Ryerson, 
 
 Blanchet, 
 
 Dufresne, Alex. 
 
 Macdonald.J.S.A.G. 
 
 , Scott, 
 
 Bourassa, 
 
 Dufresne, Jos., 
 
 Macdonald, D. A., 
 
 Sherwood, 
 
 Brousseau, 
 
 Kvanturel, 
 
 McCann, 
 
 Sicotte (Atty. Gen.), 
 
 Caron, 
 
 Foley, 
 
 McGee, 
 
 Simard, 
 
 Cortier, 
 
 Fortier, 
 
 McLachlin, 
 
 Starnes, 
 
 Cauchon, 
 
 Foamier, 
 
 Mongenais, 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 Chnpais, 
 
 Gagnon, 
 
 Morin, 
 
 Taschereau and 
 
 Clarke, 
 
 (laudet. 
 
 Morton, 
 
 Tasse.— 66. 
 
 Daoust, 
 
 Ifebert, 
 
 
 ' 
 
 So it passed in the Negative. 
 
 And the Question being again proposed, That tl, "11 be now read the 
 third time ; 
 
 The Honourable Mr. Cameron moved, in amendment, seconded by Mr. 
 Anderson, That all the words after * now ' to the end of the Question be left 
 out, and the words * recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House, for 
 the purpose of adding the following words : — *' It shall be the duty of the 
 Council of Public Instruction for Upper Canada, from time to time, to name 
 such persons as they may think fit in the respective cities and counties in 
 Upper Canada, to grant certificates of qualification to teachers of Separate 
 Schools ; and no one shall be employed as a teacher of a Separate School unless 
 and until he has obtained such certificate," * inserted instead thereof. 
 
Mr. Scott moved, in amendment to the proi)o.sed aniendiiient, seconded 
 by Mr. Pouporo, That the words, * It shall bo the duty of the Council of 
 Public Instruction for Upper Canada, from time to time, to name sndi persons 
 as they may think fit, in the respective cities and counties in I'piHir (Canada, 
 to grant certificates of qualification to teachers of Separate Schools; and no 
 one shall be employed as a teacher of a Separate School imioss and until ho 
 has obtained such certificate,' be left out, and the words, * The tciichers of 
 Separate Schools under this Act shall be subject to the same exaniinatioTi, and 
 receive their certificates of qxialification in the same nuinm^r as Common School 
 teachers generally; provided that persona qualified by law as teachers, either 
 in Upper or Lower Canada, shall be considered qualified teachers for the 
 purposes of this Act,' inserted instead thereof. 
 
 And the Question being put <»n the amendment to the said proposed 
 amendment, the House divided: and it was resolved in the Affirnuitive. 
 
 And the Question being put on the amendment to the original Question, 
 as amended, it was resolved in the Afiirmative. 
 
 Then the nuiin Question, so amended, being put; 
 
 Ordered, That the Bill be now recommitted to a Committee of the Whole 
 Plouse for the purpose of adding the following words : — ' The teachers of 
 Separate Schools under this Act shall be subject to the same examination, and 
 receive their certificates of qualification in the same manner as Common School, 
 teachers generally; provided that persons qualified by law a* teachers, either 
 in Upper or Lower Canada, shall be considered qualified teachers for the pur- 
 poses of this Act' 
 
 The House accordingly resolved itself into the said Committee, and after 
 some time spent therein, Mr. Speaker resumed the Chair; and the Honourable 
 Mr. Alleyn reported, that the Committee had gone through the Bill and nuide 
 an amendment thereto. 
 
 Ordered, That the Report be now received. 
 
 The Honourable Mr. Alleyn reported the Bill accordingly, and the amend- 
 ment was read and agreed to. 
 
 And the Question being again proposed, That the Bill be now read the 
 third time ; 
 
 The Honourable Air. Cameron moved, in amendment, seconded by Mr. 
 Anderson, That all the words after ' now ' to the end of the Question be left 
 out, and the words ' recommitted to a Committee of the Whole House for the 
 purpose of leaving out, in clause 20, from the word " authorities," and insert- 
 ing " Provided always, that the amount of the legislative grant to any 
 Separate School in any one year shall not exceed the aggregate amount con- 
 tributed by rates, fees, or otherwise, by the supporters of such Separate School 
 in said year," ' inserted instead thereof. 
 
 And the Question being put on the amendment, the House divided : and 
 the names being called for, they were taken down, as follow : — 
 
■ 
 
 Aiiiler«on, 
 
 Ault, 
 
 BiKgar, 
 
 liown, 
 
 Uurwell, 
 
 Cameron, J. H., 
 
 Curling, 
 
 Dickaon, 
 
 Diinkin, 
 
 Abbott, 
 
 Alleyn, 
 
 Archnmbault, 
 
 13aby, 
 
 Boniibien, 
 
 Beaudreau, 
 
 Benoit, 
 
 Blanchet, 
 
 Bourassa, 
 
 Brouasoau, 
 
 Oaron, 
 
 Cartier, 
 
 Chapaifi, 
 
 Clarke, 
 
 Crawford, 
 
 DaouBt, 
 
 IJawson, 
 
 I'lTguson, 
 
 iliircourt, 
 
 Iliiultain, 
 
 Jlooper, 
 
 Jai-kaon, 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Morriaori, 
 
 Mowal, 
 
 Mtinro, 
 
 Ykas: 
 Messieurs 
 
 Notman, 
 
 Powell, 
 
 Ko8g, J. S. 
 
 Scatohord, 
 
 Scobk", 
 
 Hliorwood, 
 
 Simpson, 
 
 Smith, 
 
 Somerville, 
 
 I 7 
 
 Stirton, 
 (Jockburn, 
 (Dundas) Cowan, 
 
 Maokonzie, 
 Mi-K.'llar, 
 Itykert, 
 Kymal, 
 White, and 
 
 Wright.— 36. 
 
 Nays: 
 Messieurs 
 
 DeCazes, 
 
 Denis, 
 
 Dfeaulniers, 
 
 Dorion, J. B. E., 
 
 Dostaler, 
 
 Drummond, 
 
 Dufreene, Alex., 
 
 Dufresne, Jos., 
 
 Kvanturel, 
 
 Foley, 
 
 Fortier, 
 
 Fournier, 
 
 (ingnoD, 
 
 Gaudet, 
 
 Ilebert, 
 
 Rowland, 
 
 Huntington, 
 
 Muot, 
 
 Jobin, 
 
 .loly, 
 
 Kierzkowaki, 
 
 Knight, 
 
 Labreche-Viger, 
 
 Laframboiae, 
 
 Langevin, 
 
 |LeBoutillier, 
 
 Macdonald, J. A., 
 
 Mac(l<)iuil(I..I.S.A.(J. 
 
 Macdonald, D. A., 
 
 McCann, 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 McQee, 
 
 MoLachlin, 
 
 Mongenaia, 
 
 Morin, 
 
 Morton, 
 
 O'Halloran, 
 
 Poupore, 
 
 I'lfVOSt, 
 
 Hc'millanl, 
 
 Kobitaille, 
 
 Byerson, 
 
 Scott, 
 
 Simard, 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 'J'nschereau, 
 
 Tnsse, and 
 
 Wilson.— 68. 
 
 So it passed in tho Negative. 
 
 the 
 
 Mr. 
 left 
 the 
 seri- 
 ally 
 cun- 
 'hool 
 
 and 
 
 And the Question being again proposed, That the Bill be now read the 
 ihird time; 
 
 Mr. I'erguson moved, in amendment, seconded by Mr. VViiite, Tliat at', 
 the words after ' now ' to the end of the Question bo left out, and the worda 
 * recommitted to a Committee of tlie Whole House for the purpose of inserting, 
 after the word " Townshij)," in the last lino of the twentieth section, the 
 following: — '' And that to entitle any Separate School to a share of such funds, 
 it shall be I'equisite and sufficient that such school has been under tiie nuinage- 
 ment of Separate School trustees appointed in the manner provided by this 
 Act; that it has been in actual operation during at least three months in each 
 school half-year, or six months during the whole year, and that it has been 
 attended by an average attendance of at least fifteen children of school age, 
 periods of epidemic or contagious diseases excepted," inserted instead threof.' 
 
 And the Question being put on the amendment, the House divided 
 Jt passed in the Negative. 
 
 and 
 
And llio main QueHtion hoin^ put, the IIouso divided 
 being cnliod for, they wore taken down, as follow: — 
 
 Yka8 : 
 
 and the nanioa 
 
 
 
 MossiourB 
 
 
 
 Abbott, 
 
 Clarke, 
 
 ilobert, 
 
 Poupore, 
 
 
 Alleyn, 
 
 Crawford, 
 
 11 not. 
 
 I'revost, 
 
 
 Anderson, 
 
 Daoust, 
 
 •lobin, 
 
 Hetnillard, 
 
 
 Arubanilinult, 
 
 DawBon, 
 
 Joly, 
 
 Kobitaille, 
 
 
 Uaby, 
 
 DrCazes, 
 
 Kierzkowski, 
 
 Host', 
 
 
 Ticiiubien, 
 
 Denis, 
 
 Knight, 
 
 Ryert i, 
 
 
 Bonudreau, 
 
 DrHnuliiiers, Lahrcchi'-Viger, 
 
 Ilykert, 
 
 
 Bell (IluHsell), 
 
 Dorion, A 
 
 A., i.afrainboise, 
 
 Scott, 
 
 
 Boiijmnin, 
 
 Dorion, J. 
 
 B. K., Langevin, 
 
 Sherwood, 
 
 
 Benoit, 
 
 J)ostnler, 
 
 Mandonald, J. A., 
 
 Sicott«\ (Att'y Oon 
 
 .). 
 
 Blancliet, 
 
 Dufresne, 
 
 Alex., Mn.-.lonald.,].S.A.O. 
 
 , Simard, 
 
 
 BourasRa, 
 
 Dufresne, 
 
 Jo9., McCann, 
 
 Simpson, 
 
 
 Brousseau, 
 
 Dunkin, 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 Somerville, 
 
 
 Buchanan, 
 
 Evanturel, 
 
 McOee, 
 
 Starnes, 
 
 ' 
 
 Carling, 
 
 Foley, 
 
 ■McLachlin, 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 
 Caron, 
 
 Fortior, 
 
 Mongenaifl, 
 
 Taschereau, 
 
 
 Oartier, 
 
 Fournler, 
 
 Morton, 
 
 Tas86, 
 
 
 Cauchon, 
 
 Gagnon, 
 
 O'lTalloran, 
 
 Walsh and 
 
 
 Ohapnis, 
 
 Oaudet, 
 
 Patrick, 
 Nays : 
 Messieurs 
 
 Wilson— 76. 
 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Dickson, 
 
 McKellar, 
 
 liymal, 
 
 
 Biggar, 
 
 Ferguson, 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Scatcherd, 
 
 
 Bown, 
 
 Harcourt, 
 
 Morrison, 
 
 Scoble, 
 
 
 Burwell, 
 
 Haultain, 
 
 Mowat, 
 
 Smith, 
 
 
 Cameron, J. H., 
 
 Hooper, 
 
 Munro, 
 
 Stirton, 
 
 
 Oockburn, 
 
 Jackson, 
 
 Notman, 
 
 White and 
 
 
 Cowan, 
 
 Jones, 
 
 Powell, 
 
 Wright— 31. 
 
 
 Daly, 
 
 Mackenzie 
 
 , Ross, J.S., (Dundas) 
 
 » 
 
 
 So it was resolved in the AtHrraative. 
 
 The Bill was accordingly read the third time. 
 
 Mr. Scott moved, seconded by Mr. McCann, and the Question being put, 
 That the Bill do pass, and the Title be * An Act to restore to Roman Catholics, 
 in Upper Canada, certain rights in respect to Separate Schools.' 
 
 The House divided : and the names being called for, they were taken 
 down, as follow : — 
 
 Yeas : 
 Messieurs 
 
 Abbott, 
 Alleyn, 
 
 Crawford, 
 Dawson, 
 
 Huot, 
 Jobin, 
 
 Poupore, 
 Prevost, 
 
AiKlcraoii, 
 
 Aroliuiiihaiilt, 
 
 i:al..v, 
 
 Kcaiibicn, 
 
 BwuidrpBii, 
 
 Hell (KlIHHfll), 
 
 Bi'iijiiiniii. 
 
 Bftioit, 
 
 Blanchet, 
 
 iiouras-^a, 
 
 BioiHseaii, 
 
 Buchanai), 
 
 Carlinpr, 
 
 ( 'aron, 
 
 ('artier. 
 
 Cauchon, 
 
 Clarke, 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Bipgar, 
 
 Bown, 
 
 Burwoll, 
 
 Cameron, John H., 
 
 Cockhurn, 
 
 Cowan, 
 
 Daly, 
 
 IXtnia, 
 
 DcsHiilnlcrs, 
 
 I)<»ri(it\, A. A., 
 
 Dorion, J. B. E., 
 
 DnMtHlor, 
 
 DiifnsiH', Alex., 
 
 DufrcHno, .Ioh., 
 
 Duiikin. 
 
 Kvanturel, 
 
 Foley, 
 
 Fortiflr, 
 
 FttumU'r, 
 
 Gagnon, 
 
 Oaufiet, 
 
 Hel)ort, 
 
 Howland, 
 
 Huntington, 
 
 Dickson, 
 
 FcrguBon, 
 
 ITaroourt, 
 
 Ilanltain, 
 
 TToopnr, 
 
 Jackson, 
 
 Jones, 
 
 Miu'kenrie, 
 
 J"Iy. 
 
 KitTEkow^ki, 
 
 KiiiKhi, 
 
 I^al»n'ch('-Vi>(fr. 
 
 Laf'riunhoims, 
 
 LanM:<>vin, 
 
 MHcdonalil, J. A., 
 
 MHi(l.>nal(i,J.S.A.n 
 
 MoCann, 
 
 McDongall, 
 
 Mode*', 
 
 MoLnohlin, 
 
 Morin, 
 
 Morton . 
 
 O'llnllornn. 
 
 Patrick, 
 
 Nays: 
 Messieurs 
 
 MoEcllai. 
 
 Morris. 
 
 Morrison, 
 
 Mowat, 
 
 Munro, 
 
 Notman, 
 
 rowcll. 
 
 So it was resolved iij the Affirmative. 
 
 Ili'millard, 
 
 liol.ituilK'. 
 
 Koae, 
 
 U.vkert. 
 
 Kyinal, 
 
 H(!(ttt. 
 
 BIhtwooiI, 
 , Sicotte (Atty. Ocn.), 
 Siiniird, 
 Sinipeon, 
 Foniorviili', 
 Stamcs, 
 Tnaohercan, 
 Tassfi, 
 Walsh and 
 Wilson— 74. 
 
 Rom, J. S. (Dundas), 
 
 Scatcherd, 
 
 Scoble, 
 
 Smith, 
 
 Stirton, 
 
 While and 
 
 Wright.— 80. 
 
 Ordered, That the Clerk do carry the Bill to the Legislative Council and 
 desire their concurrence. 
 
 ,, Extract prom Confkdkratiox Debates. 
 
 By reference to the Confederation Debate:? in the Canadian Assenil)ly on the 
 3rd of February 1865, it will be noted that Sir Etienne Tache moved the following 
 resolution : — 
 
 ' Timt an humble Address be presented to ITer Majesty, praying that she 
 may be graciously pleased to cause a measure to be subinitted to the Lnperial 
 Parliament for the purpose of uniting the Colonies of Canada, Xova Scotia, 
 l^ew Brunswick, Newfoundland and Prince Edward Island in one Govern- 
 ment, with provisions based on the following Eesolutions, which were adopted 
 at a Conference of Delegates from the said Colonies, held at the City of Quebec, 
 on the 10th October, 1864.' 
 
 Paragraph 43 reads as follows: — 
 
 ' The Local Legislatures shall have power to make laws respecting the 
 following subjects: — - 
 
10 
 
 * Item 6. Education ; saving the rights and privileges which the Pro- 
 testant or Catholic minority in both Canadas may possess as to their denomina- 
 tional schools at the time when the union goes into operation.' 
 
 When that item came up for discussion the Honourable J. S. Macdonald 
 moved the following amendment to it: — 
 
 That the following words be added to the original motion: — And that it 
 be an instruction to the said Connnittee to consider whether any constitutional 
 restriction which shall exclude from the Local Legislature of Upper Canada 
 the entire control and direction of education, subject only to the approval or 
 disapproval of the General Parliament, is not calculated to create widespread 
 dissatisfaction, and tend to foster and create jealousy and strife between the 
 various religious bodies in that section of the province. 
 
 The amendment was negatived on the following division : — ■* 
 
 Yeas : 
 
 ir 
 
 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Biggar, 
 
 Macdonald 
 
 
 Rymal, 
 
 Wallbridge 
 
 Burwell, 
 
 (Toronto West), 
 
 Scatcherd, and 
 
 (X.Hastings).— J 
 
 Macdonald 
 
 Ross 
 
 
 
 
 (Cornwall), 
 
 (Prince Edward). 
 
 
 
 
 
 Xays : 
 
 
 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 f 
 
 t 
 
 Abbott, 
 
 De Niverville, 
 
 
 Jones (South Leeds) 
 
 , Poulin, 
 
 AUeyn, 
 
 Dixon, 
 
 
 Knight, 
 
 Poupore, 
 
 Archarabault, 
 
 Dorion 
 
 
 Labreche-Viger, 
 
 Powell, 
 
 Ault, 
 
 (Drum'd & A'bskn),Laframboi8e, 
 
 Raymond, 
 
 Beaubien, 
 
 Dorion (Hochelaga), Lajoie, 
 
 Remillard, 
 
 Bellerose, 
 
 Duckett, 
 
 
 Langevin, 
 
 Robitaille, 
 
 Blanchet, 
 
 ^ufresne 
 
 
 LeBoutillier, 
 
 Rose, 
 
 Bourassa, 
 
 (Iberville), 
 
 
 Macdonald, 
 
 Ross (Champlain), 
 
 Bowman, 
 
 ^ Lif resne 
 
 
 (Attorney General 
 
 . Ross (Dundas), 
 
 Bown, 
 
 (Montcalm), 
 
 
 ^lackenzie 
 
 Scoble, 
 
 Brousseau, 
 
 >unsford. 
 
 
 (Lambton), 
 
 Shanly, 
 
 Brown, 
 
 vanturel, 
 
 
 Mackenzie 
 
 Smith 
 
 Cameron 
 
 erguson 
 
 
 (North Oxford), 
 
 (East Durham), 
 
 (North Ontario), 
 
 (Frontenac), 
 
 
 Magill, 
 
 Smith 
 
 Carling, 
 
 Fortier, 
 
 
 McConkey, 
 
 (Toronto East), 
 
 Caron, 
 
 Gait, 
 
 
 McDougall, 
 
 Somerville, 
 
 Cartier, Atty. Gen., 
 
 Gaucher, 
 
 
 McGee, 
 
 Stirton, 
 
 Cartwriglit, 
 
 Gaudet, 
 
 
 McGivern, 
 
 Sylvain, 
 
 Cauchon, 
 
 Geoffrion, 
 
 
 Mclntyre, 
 
 Thompson, 
 
 Chapais, 
 
 Gibbs, 
 
 
 McKellar, 
 
 Tremblay, 
 
 Cockburn, 
 
 Harwood, 
 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Walsh, 
 
 Cornellier, 
 
 Haultain, 
 
 
 Morrison, 
 
 Webb, 
 
 Coupal, 
 
 Higginson, 
 
 
 Paquet, 
 
 Wells, 
 
 Cowan, 
 
 Holton, 
 
 
 Parker, 
 
 White, 
 
 Currier, 
 
 Houde, 
 
 
 Perrault, 
 
 Wilson, and 
 
 DeBoucherville, 
 
 Rowland, 
 
 
 Pinsonneault, 
 
 Wood.— 95. 
 
 Denis, 
 
 
 
 
 
11 
 
 le Pro- 
 loniina- 
 
 icdonald 
 
 that it 
 utional 
 O'anada 
 oval or 
 jspread 
 sen the 
 
 fs).— 8. 
 
 lain), 
 ), 
 
 Extract iROii British Xorth America Act, 1867. 
 
 Education. 
 
 93. In and for each Province the Legishitnre may exclusively make Laws 
 in relation to Education, subject and according to the following Provisions: — 
 
 (1.) Nothing in any such Law shall prejudicially affect any right or 
 Privilege with respect to Denominational Schools which any 
 Class of Persons have by Law in the Province at the Union: ^ 
 
 (2.) All the Powers, Privileges, and Duties at the Union by Law con- 
 ferred and imposed in Upper Canada on the Separate Schools 
 and School Trustees of the Queen's Koman Catholic subjects 
 shall be and the same are hereby extended to the Dissentient 
 Schools of the Queen's Protestant and Eoman Catholic Subjects 
 in Quebec: 
 
 (3.) Where in any Province a System of Separate or Dissentient School^ 
 exists by Law at the Union or is thereafter established by the 
 Legislature of the Province, an Appeal shall lie to the Governor 
 General in Council from any Act or Decision of any Provincial 
 Authority affecting any Right or Privilege of the Protestant or 
 Roman Catholic Minority of the Queen's Subjects in relation 
 to Education : 
 
 (4.) In case any such Provincial Law as from Time to Time seems to 
 the Governor General in Council requisite for the due Execution 
 of the Provisions of this Section is not made, or in case any 
 Decision of the Governor General in Council on any Appeal 
 under this Section is not duly executed by the proper Provincial 
 Authority in that Behalf, then and in every such Case, and as 
 far only as the Circumstances of each Case require, the Parlia- 
 ment of Canada may make remedial Laws for the due Execu- 
 tion of the Provisions of this Section and of any Decision of 
 the Governor General in Council under this Section. 
 
 am), 
 ast), 
 
 Extract from Manitoba Act. 
 
 The educational clause in the Imperial Act granting a constitution to the 
 Province of Manitoba, reads as follows : — 
 
 In and for the Province the said Legislature may exclusively make Laws 
 in relation to Education, subject and according to the following Provisions: — 
 
 (1.) N^othing in any such Law shall prejudicially affect any Right or 
 Privilege with respect to Denominational Schools which any 
 Class of Persons have by Law or Practice in the Province at 
 the Union. 
 
 (2.) An Appeal shall lie to the Governor General in Council from any 
 Act or Decision of the Legislature of the Province, or of any 
 
11 
 
 Provincial Authority, aflfecting any Right or Privilege of the 
 Protestant or Roman Catholic Minority of the Queen's Subjects 
 in relation to Educiition. 
 
 (3.) In case any such Provincial Law as from Time to Time seems to 
 the Governor General in Council requisite for the due Execution 
 of the Provisions of this Section is not made, or in case any 
 Decision of the Governor (Jeneral in Council on any Ap})eal 
 under this Section is not duly executed by the proper Provincial 
 Authority in that Behalf, then and in every such (\ase, and as 
 far only as the Circumstances of each (^asc may require, the 
 Parliament of Canada may make remedial Laws for the due 
 ICxecution of the Provisions of this Section and of any Decision 
 of the Governor General in Council under this Section. 
 
 Extract from Commons Hansard, 1870. 
 
 The following is the debate and the division on the motion for its adoption 
 "in the Parliament of Canada : — 
 
 Mr. Olivkr moved that the Educational Clause be struck out. 
 
 Hon. Mr. Chauveau hoped the amendment would not be carried. It 
 was desirable to protect the minority in Manitoba from the great evil of 
 religious dissensions on education. There could be no better model to follow 
 in that case than the Union Act, which gave full protection to minorities. It 
 was impossible to say who would form a majority there, Protestants or Catho- 
 lics. If the population were to come fi'om over the seas, then the Protestants 
 would be in a majority. If, as had been asserted, Manitoba was to be a French 
 preserve, then the Catholics would be a majority. He did not care which, 
 because he desired only to see the new province freed from discussions which 
 had done so much injury in the old provinces of Canada. They presented a 
 problem to the whole world, and the question was, could two Christian bodies, 
 almost equally balanced, be held together under the British Constitution. He 
 believed that problem could we worked out successfully. 
 
 lion. Mr. McDouGALL, M.C., said the effect of the clause, if not struck 
 out, would be to fix laws which the Local Legislature could not alter in future, 
 and that it would ba better to leave the matter to local authorities to decide, as 
 in the other provinces. He quite agreed with his hon. friend in giving the 
 same powers to this province as the others, and it was for that reason that he 
 desired to strike out the clause. 
 
 Hon. Sir George E. Cartier referred to the manner in which the Red 
 River country had been settled, and grants of land which had been made to the 
 clergy for the purposes of education. 
 
 Mr. Mackenzie was prepared to leave the matter to be settled exclusively 
 by the Local Legislature. The British North America Act gave all the pro- 
 tection necessary for minorities; and local authorities understood their own 
 local wants better than the General Legislature. It was his earnest desire to 
 
13 
 
 avoid introduciTjg into the new province those detrimental discussions which 
 had operated so unhai)pily on their own country, and therefore hoped the 
 amendment would be carried. 
 
 After a long discussion, a division was taken on the amendment: 
 34. Nays, 81. 
 
 Yeas: 
 
 -Yeas, 
 
 Ault, 
 
 Bodwell, 
 
 Bolton, 
 
 Bowell, 
 
 Bowman, 
 
 Brown, 
 
 Connell, 
 
 Dobbie, 
 
 Drew, 
 
 Ferguson, 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 Jones Morrison 
 
 (Leeds & Grenville) (Victoria, O.), 
 Kirkpatrick, Oliver, 
 
 ^lacdonald Redford, 
 
 (Glengarry), Ross (Dundas), 
 
 Mackenzie, Ross (Prince Edward] Wells, 
 
 McConkey, Ross White, 
 
 McDougall (Lanark). (Victoria, N.S.), Wright, (York, 
 Metcalfe, Ross Ont, W.R.), and 
 
 Mills, (Wellington (5.R.), Young.— 34. 
 
 Nays : 
 
 Rymal, 
 
 Snider, 
 
 Stirton, 
 
 Thompson (Ontario), 
 
 Wallace, 
 
 
 
 Messieurs 
 
 
 Archambeault, 
 
 Coupal, 
 
 Huot, 
 
 Morison 
 
 Archibald, 
 
 Crawford 
 
 Hurdon, 
 
 (Niagara), 
 
 Beaubien, 
 
 (Brockville), 
 
 Keeler, 
 
 O'Connor, 
 
 Bechard, 
 
 Daoust, 
 
 Lacerte, 
 
 Peltier, 
 
 Bellerose, 
 
 Dorion, 
 
 Langevin, 
 
 Perry, 
 
 Benoit; 
 
 Dufresne, 
 
 Langlois, 
 
 Pinsonneault, 
 
 Blanchet, 
 
 Duncan, 
 
 Lawson, 
 
 Pope, 
 
 Bourassa, 
 
 Fortier, 
 
 Le Vesconte, 
 
 Pouliot, 
 
 Brown, 
 
 Fortin, 
 
 McDonald 
 
 Pozer, 
 
 Brousaeau, 
 
 Gaucher, 
 
 (Lunenburg) 
 
 Kay, 
 
 Burtin, 
 
 Gaudet, 
 
 McDonald 
 
 Renaud, 
 
 Cameron (Peel), 
 
 GeofFrion, 
 
 (Middlesex), 
 
 Robitaille, 
 
 Campbell, 
 
 Gendron, 
 
 Masson 
 
 Ryan (King's, N.B.), 
 
 Carling, 
 
 Gibbs, 
 
 (Soulanges), 
 
 Savary, 
 
 Caron, 
 
 Godin, 
 
 Masson 
 
 Scatcherd, 
 
 Cartier 
 
 Grant, 
 
 (Terrebonne), 
 
 Scriver,. 
 
 (Sir George E.), 
 
 Gray, 
 
 McDougall 
 
 Shanly, 
 
 Casault, 
 
 Grover, 
 
 (Three Rivers), 
 
 Stephenson, 
 
 Cayley, , 
 
 Heath, 
 
 McGreevy, 
 
 TiUey, 
 
 Chauveau, 
 
 Ilincks 
 
 McKeagney, 
 
 Tremblay, 
 
 Cheval, 
 
 (Sir Francis] 
 
 , Merritt, 
 
 Walsh, and 
 
 dmon. 
 
 Holmes, 
 
 Morris, 
 
 Wilson.— 81. 
 
 Costigan, 
 
 Holton, 
 
 ( 
 
 
. ■ ',■■■».. 
 
A Brief Sketch from ^ Hansard ' showing the Beaaons 
 why Separate Schools were est atjlisJied when grant- 
 ing a Constitution to the Mortti-west Territories, 
 
 On the 12th March, 1875, the Hon. Mr. Mackenzie, then Premier, when intro- 
 ducing the Act to amend and consolidate the laws respecting the Territories, ia 
 reported in the Commons Hansard, page 653, as follows ; — 
 
 As he intimated on a furnier occasion, llic (joveninient decided some tinu! 
 ago to establish an entirely independent CJoveviiment in those Territories. To 
 a certain e\tent it would have been advisable, before such un Act was passed, 
 if it could be done, to have the boundary of JMaiiitobu rcctitied, but that was a 
 matter which it was ditlieult to deal with at IIk; present iiioiiK'iit. 
 
 In the Bill, as first introduced, no reference was made to the subject of educa- 
 tion, and this omission was made the subject of comment at a later stage of the 
 de,bate. 
 
 The following extracts from the speech of the Hon. Edward Blake, then an 
 independent Liberal, gives his views on the Bill submitted ; — 
 
 The task which the Ministry hud set for itself was the most important it 
 was possible to conceive. !|?o found primary institutions under which we hope 
 to see hundreds of thousands, and the more sanguine of us tliink, millions of 
 men and families settled and nourishing, was one of the noblest undertakings 
 that could be entered upon by any legislative body, and it was no small indica- 
 tion of the power and true position of this Dominiiu that Parliament should 
 be engaged to-day in that important task. He agreed with tlie hon. member for 
 Kingston (Sir John A. Macdonald) that the task was one that required time, 
 consideration and deliberation, and they must take care that no false steps were 
 made in such a work. He did not agree with that right hon. gentleman that 
 the Government ought to repeal his errors. The right hon. gentleman had tried 
 the institutions for the j^orth-west Territories which he now asked the House 
 to frame, and for tlie same reason as lie had given to-day — that it would be 
 better for the Dominion Government to keep matters in their own hands and 
 decide what was best for the future. He (Mr. Blake) believed that it was 
 essential to our obtaining a large immigration to the jS^orth-west that we should 
 tell the people beforehand what (hone vkjIiIs were to he in the country in ivhich 
 we invited them to settle. 
 
 * 
 
 * 
 
 * 
 
 He regarded it as essential, under the circumstances of the country, and 
 in view of the deliberation during the last few clays, that a general principle 
 should be laid down in the Bill with respect, to public instruction. He did 
 believe that Ave ought not to introduce into that territory the heartburnings 
 and difficulties with which certain other portions of the Dominion and other 
 countries had been afflicted. Jt seemed to him, having regard to the fact that, 
 as far as we could expect at present, the general character of that population 
 
 5869—1 14 
 
15 
 
 would be somev'hnt annlogons to the ])opulation of Ontario, that there should 
 be some provision in the constitution by which thoy should have conferred 
 upon them (he same rights end privileges in ref)ard to religious instruction as 
 those possessed by the people of the province of Ontario. The principles of 
 local self-government and the settling of the question of public instruction 
 seemed to him ought to be the cardinal principles of the measure. 
 
 When answering Mr. Blake, the Premier is reported as follows : — 
 
 As to the subject of public instruction, it did not in the first place attract 
 his attention, but when he cainc to the subject of local taxation, he was 
 reminded of it. Not having had time before to insert a clause on the subject, he 
 proposed to do so when the JJill was in Committee. The clause j)rovided that 
 the Lieutenant-Governor, by and with the consent of his Council or Assembly, 
 as the case might be, should pass all necessary Ordinances in respect of educa- 
 tion, but it would be specially provided that the majority of the ratepayers might 
 establish such schools and impose such necessary assessment as they might 
 think fit; and that the minority of the ratepayers, whether Protestant or 
 Roman Catholic, might establish separate schools; and such ratepayers would 
 be liable ordy to such educational assessments as they might impose upon 
 themselves. This, he hoped, would meet the objection offered by the hon. 
 meuibor for South Bruce. 
 
 Mr. D. A. Smith, then member for Selkirk (the present Lord Strathcona), 
 touched upon the subject in the following words : — 
 
 The point brought up by the hon. member for South Bruce (Mr. Blake) 
 was an important one, and he was glad to find that the First Minister intended 
 to introduce a provision in Committee dealing with the subject. 
 
 •■' The following extract is given as showing the opinion of the late Hon. David 
 
 Mills, who has always been regarded as a high authority on const utional subjedts : 
 
 There was another matter it seemed to him ought not to be disregarded; 
 and that was the terms and conditions imder which these people would ulti- 
 mately be formed into a j^rovince. It would be better that the people who settle 
 thai territory should know beforehand the terms and conditions under which 
 they would become an organized part of the Dominion. He saw no objection, 
 when the population became sufficiently large, to allowing that territory to be 
 represented in the Dominion Parliament before it was organized into a 
 province. 
 
 » The educational clause, as introduced in committee, section 11, reads as 
 
 ; follows : — 
 
 Whe7i, and so soon as any system of taxation shall he adopted in any dis- 
 trict or portion of the North-west Territories, the Lieutenant-Governor, by and 
 with the consent of the Council or Assembly, as the case may be, shall pass all 
 necessary Ordinances in respect to education; hut it shall therein be always 
 provided, that a majority of the ratepayers of any district or portion of the 
 North-west Territories, or any lesser portion or sub-division thereof, by what- 
 ever name the same may be hnown, may establish such schools therein as they 
 may think fit, and make the necessary assessment and collection of rates 
 therefor ; and further, that the minority of the ratepayers therein, whether 
 Protestant or Roman Catholic, may establish Separate Schools therein, and 
 that, in such latter case, the ratepayers establishing such Protestant or Roman 
 
n 
 
 and 
 
 Catholic Separate Schools nhall be liahle, only in asftessmeulft of mich rairs as 
 they may impose upon themselves in respect thereof. 
 
 The Bill pafisal throuKh its several stages in the House of Commonit without 
 any opposition ; not a single observation is to be found in the debute intimating 
 that any one member dissented to the aducationnl clause. 
 
 Iti the Senate, on the motion for thu third reading by Mr. Scott, Mr. Aikins 
 said : — 
 
 He was opposed to a provision in this Bill. In the 11th clause provision 
 was made for the maintenance of certain .scliools for Protostants and Roman 
 Catholics separately. He thought it was un.vise to introduce anything of tliis 
 nature into the Bill. He, therefore, moved, seconded by the Hon. Mr. Flint, 
 to strike out all the words after * therefor ' in the li-'th line. 
 
 The following extracts from the debate prove conclusively that it was recog- 
 nized by both opponents and supporters of separate schools that the Bill was 
 adopting a constitutional principle which could not afterwards bo changed. 
 
 Mr. Brown said : The safe way for us was to let e:;cli province suit 
 itself in such matters. This country was tilled by })eople of all classes and 
 creeds, and there would be no end of confusion if each class had to have its 
 own peculiar school system. It had been said this clause was put in for the 
 protection of the Protestants against the (Catholics, the latter being the most 
 numerous. But he, speaking for the Protestants, was in a iwsition to say that 
 we did not want that protection. 
 
 Mr. Scott, in reply, among other observations, said : 
 
 Any gentleman would have to admit that it was the greatest pos- 
 sible relief to the people of Ontario that this question was settled 
 for them, and was not, as in some of the other provinces, a source 
 of constant discord. He was one of those who maintained that parents had a 
 right to educate their children as they pleased, and that they ought not to be 
 taxed to maintain schools to which they could not conscientiously send their 
 children. Our whole system of Government was based upon that sound prin- 
 ciple, and how long could we have happiness and peace in this country if we 
 were to abolish that safeguard, which was now recognized in both the large 
 provinces? Would not every gentleman in this Chamber gladly see the New 
 Brunswick trouble removed? Now was the proper time to establish in the 
 new territory a principle that ought years ago have been established in this 
 Dominion. He hoped hon. gentlemen would not take advantage of their 
 majority to force upon the House a principle to Avhich many were conscien- 
 tiously opposed. 
 
 Hon. Mr. Miller said : — 
 
 Parliament had an undoubted right, under these circumstances, to make 
 such provisions regarding the question of education, or any other question, for 
 this new territory, as in its wisdom it thought best for the future peace and 
 well-being of the country. The difficulties they had already encountered in 
 the old provinces in regard to education should be a Avarning to them to prevent 
 similar troubles arising in the provinces they hoped to see spring up in the 
 North-west. This policy had been applied to Manitoba, and who can deny 
 that that course bad been wise, and would save that province from all the 
 discord and bitter agitation through which the older provinces were either 
 
IT 
 
 passing or lisul iilnixlv piishcd. 1 1 wjis niifortniint(> tliat tlic Act, of llnioii liiid 
 not settled tiie ediieiil imiiil ri-flil id" ill! the old pi'uviii<H!s on a just, and lil)erjil 
 hasis, as luid Iteeii done in Ontario and (jiiobee. 
 
 # # * ' # ' '# ♦" # 
 
 lie llionglil lliey slmnld take a lesson lioni their |)a>l e\p('ri«'nee, and 
 deal willi llie subject in a lair and liheial si)irit. All the iSill asked was that 
 all parties in that, new eoMiitrv .slinidd have such sehoids as they ehose to estab- 
 lish at their own expense, and that niinnrilies woidd at all times be safe against 
 tlie tyranny or intnleranee of nnijoritie^. That wonld not be interferinj; with 
 the just rights of any bo(|y or elmi; biil. ^n the enntrary, it wonld be ginir- 
 anteeing tb(! rights (d' all classes. // iroiihl siinpli/ he [irovidbuj, while they 
 had the poircr to do so, for freedom of eoiiseicnce vj'dh ref/drd. lo the vexed 
 qiieslion of edne(dion. It slionld be burne in mind llnit tlie body to wbicb bo 
 belonged felt deeply in this (piestion. and w<uild never (piietly submit to injus- 
 tice or oppression in reference to it. That body coni])rised forty-live or forty- 
 seven ])er ctiiit of the whole population of this Dominion, and allbougb tbey 
 did not possess a fair i'e|iresentatioii in the Senate in pro))ortion to population, 
 they were still strong enough here and els(>wbore to resist injustice and vindi- 
 cate their conscientious views with icgnrd lo this or any oilier question. 
 
 Hon. Mr. Lctojlier dc St. Tiist said : — 
 
 The (Jovermnent knew that gnat dillieulties bad already arisen in the 
 existing provinces with regard to the sdnxd (|iiesti<in, and it was to prevent 
 these ditfioulties in the new |)ro\ ince thai this clause had becni introduced. He 
 thought we (tnght to try as niiicli ;is possible to legislate for the peace and 
 harmony of all classes, whenever we bad the power to do so. TFe would not 
 say any more, but only express the hope that this House would not accept the 
 amendment of bis lion, friend. 
 
 Hon. Mr. Ryan : — * 
 
 Argued children should be taught religion, while acquiring secular 
 knowledge; if not so instructed mi week days, it would be difficult to inculcate 
 religion at all. The tendency of the aiiioiidment was to ignore religious educa- 
 tion altogether. The clause (d' the Hill did not necessarily involve Sepai'ate 
 Schools, but merely gave the minority, and the majority as well, the right to 
 choose their own schools. It was tli(^ duly of this House to see to the pi'otection 
 of the minorities. 
 
 Hon. Sir Alexander 'Campbell, leader of the opposition, said : — 
 It wonld he much lo he regretted if llie amendment passed. The ohject 
 of the Bill was to estahlish and perpelaate in the North-west Territories the 
 same system as prevailed in Ontario and Quebec, and which had worked so 
 well in the interest of peace and harmony ivlth the different populations of 
 those provinces. He thought the fairer course, and the better one, for all 
 races and creeds, was to adopt the suggestion of the Government and enable 
 people to establish Separate Schools in that territory, and thus prevent the 
 introduction of evils from which Ontario and Quebec had suffered, but had 
 judiciously rid themselves. 
 
 Hon. Mr. Penny said, though he was not an admirer o£ the separate school 
 system, it had been found necessary, in the interest of peace, to adopt it for Quebec 
 
18 
 
 nnd Oiiturio, nnd, as n Himilnr nffitation for it would nnturnlly arise in thn North- 
 west in tile courao of time, we might as well settle the mnttir at onre by allowing 
 *the creation of .teparale schools.' 
 
 Hon. Mr. Urown snid lu> oonrurrrd with what liad fallen from his hon. friendfl 
 on the treasury l)enches, and from hon. ffniitlemen who hud spoken on the amend- 
 nu«it, with respect to the propriety of allowing msparat*! sehoolw. But t'lr question 
 was not whether tliose schools were right or wrong, good or had, hut iw to whether 
 it was wise for this <!ountry to deal with this (|iiustion. He (init<( admitted the 
 importance of the issue whi(!h had heen raisod — whether this matter shoidd be 
 referred to the provinces interested for settlement, or bo brought to the Dominion 
 legislature!. 
 
 Hon. Mr. Brown later spoke as follows : — 
 
 The momenl this Act passed, and the North-west became part of the Union, 
 Ihcy came under the Union Act, and under the provisions vilU refjard to 
 Separate Schools. 
 
 Tlie vote \va.s taken on Mr. Aikens' luiiendnient. Contents, 22; Non- 
 contents, 24. Anicndnient lost. 
 
 It does not appear that there was any adverse criticism in the press, thougli 
 the clauses in the Bill were referred to in th© leading newspapers of the period, 
 and as far as can be ascertained the Act was accepted at the time in the Territo- 
 ries without dissent. 
 
 Under the Territorial legislation, the rights of the minority have in the 
 past been recognized. It wonld he a breach of faith and a violation of the 
 British Xorth AnuM-iea Act to disturb now the rights and ])rivileges granted 
 by the Parliament of (^inada thirty years ago, and enjoyed by the ininorities 
 up to the present time. 
 
All Objccl Ussoii 111 lolcTaiion lor Laiiauiaii Law iMaiaTs 
 
 Extract from Imperial Parliamentary Blue Book being a Return presented to both Houses of 
 Parliament showing expenditure from the grant for public education in Scotland in the year 1903 
 page 6. 
 
 PART 1. 
 Table 1. 
 
 (B) Classified according to Denomination of Recipients. 
 
 ' Compared with year c'liUoU 
 
 For year ended ^, ^^^^ ,y„^ 
 
 ,^i Dec, Kjo^^ 
 
 Increase 
 
 DecreaMC 
 
 On Public Schools 
 
 '• Church of Scotland Schools 
 " United Free Church Schools 
 '* Undenominational Schools . 
 '* Episcopal Schools 
 
 Roman Catholic Schools 
 
 Adnunistration (as in table A.).. 
 
 ji: s. d. 
 
 722,540 8 II 
 
 27,26.^ 15 10 
 
 ■J5.5'J5 7 a 
 
 23,4H(> 1 1 9 
 
 <5.44<^ 5 4 
 
 7".75« '1 3 
 
 5*J''44 '' 
 
 jC s. d ^' s. d. 
 50,608 8 h 
 
 From 1839 to 
 31 Dec, 1903. 
 
 365 >^J 4j 
 
 2,862 7 6: 
 
 2,516 19 9i 
 
 .?..H5 10 III 
 
 i('3 '4 
 
 " ''5''3 '5 ^ 
 
 Grants to School Boards under Acts 35 and 
 36 Vic. c. 62, s. 67 and 60 and 61 Vic 
 
 c 62, s. I 
 
 Special grants to schools in Hij^hlands and 
 Islands 
 
 66, 1 34 
 
 970 
 
 o 
 
 Fee grants for day scholars... 328,682 14 
 
 Aid grants for Voluntary schools under 
 sec. 2 of Education (Scotland) Act, 
 1S97 j 12,763 10 o 
 
 Grants for Agricultural Education 
 
 Grants for Science and Art 
 
 i 
 1 
 
 Grants under Code for continuation classes! 112,742 5 5 
 
 Grants for Edinburg Museum of Science: 
 
 and Art ; 14.599 '4 2 
 
 Expenses of Education Board under Act 351 
 
 and 36 Vic. c. 62 ! 
 
 9,236 12 9. 
 
 [,280 o o 
 
 5,063 I I o 
 
 354 »9 3 
 
 2,975 I 6; 
 
 I 
 
 756 II 9 . 
 
 1,480,130 16 lol 79,609 17 51,643 14 
 
 £ s. d. 
 
 <3.39«."9i 7 "«' 
 
 3,803,079 15 2 
 
 404,731 8 II 
 
 1,217,321 I 4 
 
 1,215,232 13 2 
 
 448,646 18 o 
 
 19,306 19 7 
 
 3,678,029 4 o 
 
 74,401 18 o 
 
 14,000 o o 
 
 281,730 19 I 
 
 168,585 12 5 
 
 38,080 2 8 
 
 29.31 ' 3 4 
 
 24,790,649 36 
 
 Has the teaching of religion and morals in the schools of Scotland been more productive of good 
 01 of evil. 
 
 Facts speak more forcibly than words.