IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) &o z < ' :\ \ \ -^\. ^>^ Wc^ <^ u i/. CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHIVI/iCiVlH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Tachnical and Bibliographic Notas/Notaa tacliniquaa at bibliographiquaa Tha Inatituta haa attamptad to obtain tha baat original copy availabia for filming. Faaturaa of thia copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua, which may altar any of tha imagoa in tnm raproduction, or which may significantly chango tha usual mathod of filming, ara chackad balow. □ Colourad covors/ Couvortura da coulaur I — I Covars damagad/ D n D Couvortura andommagia Covars rastorad and/or laminatad/ Couvortura rastaurte at/ou palliculAa I — I Covar titia missing/ La titra da couvortura manqua Colourad mapa/ Cartaa giographiquaa an coulaur Colourad ink (i.a. othar than bluo or black)/ Encra da coulaur (i.a. autra qua blaua ou noira) Colourad plataa and/or illustrations/ Planchaa at/ou illustrations an coulaur Bound with othar matorial/ Rail* avac d'autras documants Tight binding may causa shadovirs or distortion along intarior margin/ La rB liura sarria paut causar da I'ombra ou dm la distorsion !• long da la marga intiriaura Blank laavas addad during rastoration may appaar within tha text. Whanavar possibla. thasa hava baan omittad from filming/ II so paut qua cartainas pagas blanchaa a'ourias lors d'una rastauration apparaissant dana !• taxta, mais. lorsqua cala itait possibla, cas pagaa n'ont paa it6 filmtea. L'Inatitut a microfilm^ la maillaur axamplaire qu'il lui a itt possiblo da sa procurer. Las details da cat axamplaira qui sont paut-4tra uniquas du point da vua bibliographiqua, qui pauvant modifier una image reproduite. ou qui peuven^ exiger une modification dana la mithoda normaia da filmaga sont indiquAs ci-dessous. pn Coloured pages/ D D E D B Pages de couleur Pagea damaged/ Pages endommagAea Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pagas rastaurias at/ou pallicultes Pagea discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pagea dicolorias, tacheties ou piquies Pages detached/ Pagea dAtachies Showthrough/ Transparence Tha to tl Tha post ofti film Orig bagi tha sion othfl first sion or ill Quality of print varies/ Quality inigala de I'imi mpression nigala supplei Comprend du material supplAmantaire Only edition available/ Seule Mition disponible r~n Includes supplementary material/ r~l Only edition available/ The shal TINi whi( Map diffj entir bagii right raqu mati D Pagas wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc.. have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Lea pages totalement ou partieilement obscurcies par un fauillet d'errata. une pelure, etc.. ont it6 fiimies A nouveau de fapon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl^mentaires: Various pagings. Wrinkled pages may film slightly out of focus. This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce docjinant est film* au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous 10X 14X 18X 22X 26X 30X 1 y 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X ire details •s du modifier er une filmage Th« copy filmed har« haa baan raproducad thanka to tha ganaroaity of: University of Sailcatcliewan Sasicatoon Tha imagaa appaaring hara ara tha boat quality poaaibia conaidaring tha condition and lagibility of tha original copy and in icaaping with tha filming contract apacificationa. L'axampiaira film* fut raproduit grAca A la gAnAroaiti da: Cniversity of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Laa imagaa auivantaa ont At* raproduitaa avac la plua grand aoin. compta tanu da la condition at da la nattatA da l'axampiaira filmA. at an conformitA avac laa conditiona du contrat da fiimaga. es Original copiaa in printad papar eovara ara fiimad beginning with the front cover and ending on the laat page with a printed or illuatrated imprea- aion, or tha back cover when appropriate. Ail other original copiaa are filmed beginning on the f irat page with a printed or illuatrated imprea- aion. and ending on the laat page with a printad or illuatrated impreaaion. The laat recorded frame on each microfiche ahall contain the aymbol —^(meaning "CON* TINUED"), or the aymbol y (meaning "END"), whichever appiiea. Lee exemplairea originaux dont la couverture en papier eat imprimAe aont fiimAa an commenpant par le premier plat at an terminant aoit par la derniAre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impreaalon ou d'illuatration, aoit par le second plat, aelon le caa. Toua laa autrea exemplairea originaux aont fiimAa an commenpant par la premiAre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impresaion ou d'illuatration at an terminant par la derniAre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un dee symboiea auivanta apparattra sur la derniAre image de chaque microfiche, seion le caa: le aymbole — *> signifie "A SUIVRE". le aymboia y aignifla "FIN". errata Mo ) pelure, on it 32X Mapa, plataa, charta, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratioa. Thoae too large to be entirely included in one expoaure »n filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, aa many framea aa required. The following diagrama liluatrata the method: 1 2 3 Lea cartea, planchea, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre filmAe A dee taux de rAduction diff Arents. Loraque le document eat trop grand pour Atre reproduit en un seul clichA, il eat filmA A partir de I'angle aupAriaur gauche, de gauche A droite, et de haut en baa, en prenant le nombre d'imagea nAceaaaire. Las diagrammea auivanta lliuatrent la mAthode. 1 2 3 4 5 6 k xmmmiii'mmiA^:A\J AND THE ^ SUN OF OUU SYSTEM rVj' FOUNDED ON THE FIRST CHAPTER OF GENESIS, ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE EARTH, AND ON THE MODIiUN DISCOVERIES IN THAT SCIENCE, AND THE KN(»WN OPERATIONS OF THE LAW OF NATURE, As evinced ly the discoveries of LAVOISIER, AND OTHERS IN PNEUMATIC CHEMISTRY. FOVnTH EDITION REVISED AND ENLARGED, ff ^2 !Q|c«^ ?:a32loi% : J TORONTO: PBINTED BY W. J. COATES, KING-STREET. MAY 171971 526710^ it 5fJife.vl^ ^ fei ^ ^1 4 V. TO MEMORANDUM FOR THE READER. The reader will find the new mailer of the Second, Third, and present Editions in (he Appendix No, 2, at the end t of the Work, ^ \-h_j,^'^ \? PREFACE. In my endeavours to reconcile the present Geological appearances of our Earth, with the Mosaic account of Creation, the only certain means that appeare). to me, were, the adoption of that construction of the first verse of Genesis, which I have stated in a pkrt of this Work, and it will be seen by an extract from the Quar- terly Review of April last, inserted below, that this construction has been confirmed and sanctioned by the writings of Professor Buckland,, Doctors Pusey and Chalmers, Bishop Gleig, and other eminent Divines. These authorities have removed the diffidence I had long felt to publish a different construction from what has, hitherto, prevailed. The original manuscript of this work was composed between the years 1819 & 1825. The writings of the above reverend gentlemen were published, I believe, several years aflerwards, and none of them ha\e been pel used by me, until a few days since, when I met with the Review of the Bridgewater Treatise of Doc- tor Buckland. In the summer of 1829, I presented a prospectus of the work to Archdeacon Mountain, and to the Bishop of Quebec. The former kindly complimented me on it, and the latter recommended my publishing it in Lon. don, for which I was soon to embark. I arrived there in. October of same year, and presented the prospectus to the Lord Bishop of London, from whom I received a note by which he was pleased to commend the design of the work. I subsequently presented the prospectus to several of the principal Booksellers, who, on learning that the size of the work would be that of a pamphlet, IV. informed me, tha*. the cost of advertising was so great* that uo pamphlet would pay it, and my circumstances preventing me from incurring that expence, ( gave up the intention of publishing. In the mean time, a reverend gentleman of the name of Fairholme was p*iblishing a theological work con- nected with geology, and I enclosed to him a copy of the prospectus, and in a letter I received from him, dated Oct. 14th, 1833, he says, " with regard to the Creation of our earth or of the sun, and other members of the Solar System I have neither found in the work of any writer, nor can I conceive the smallest grounds on which to form a consistent theory, nor in- deed do I conceive that it belongs to the science of geology at all. Scripture has given us no insight into it. The existing laws of nature are equally silent, and yet these laws must have existed from the beginning," lie then assumes, " that the granito mass has been formed before the existence ol organized beings, as their remains are never found in it," an opinion v/hich, I think, the reader will find answered in note 2nd of this work ; and the assertion that neither scripture nor the laws of nature give any insight into the Creation, appears to me so futile, that I have inserted the above extract, solely to prove, that the construction i had put on the 1st verse of Qenesis, had not rt the date of that letter, been yet made by any other writer. By the follov/ing extract from the Bridge water Trea- tise of the Rev. Doctor Buckland, pi blished long since the date of Mr. Fairholme's letter, it will be seen that construction has been sanctioned and confirmed by the authorities mentioned above. And having presented my prospectus to the persons aviove named, and also to the Royal Institution in Al- bemarle-street, London, in 1833, I consider it a duty ■.hj 1 :J1 V. was so great, (ircutnstances ce, I gave up ,n of the name cal work con- him a copy of ed from him, regard to the )ther members id in the work the smallest heory, nor in- the science of no insight into equally silent, Ihe beginning" naos has been 2ed beings, as opinion v/liich, note 2nd of ir scripture nor I the Creation, jrted the above ction i had put he date of that r. Igewater Trea* shed long since lill be seen that |nfirmed by the to the persons stitution in Al- Isider it a duty 1 y.A to ^.lyself to claim the originating of that construction, by which the general appearanc3of ^racft/aZ deposition in the geology of the earth, (whose diameter must, ac- cording to the modern geologists, have existed millions of years) will, as well as this supposed age, be now reconciled and satisfactorily explained by the Mosaic account. Extract ft cm the Review of tie Bridgewater Treatise. ** If there are any lovers of science yet ignorant of the ex- tent and fertility of the field which Geology has laid open — of the intensity and variety of interest by which those who explore it are repaid — here is a work to astonish and delight them. If there are any persons yet deterred from the study of this fasci. nating science, by the once prevalent notion, that the facts, or theories if you will, that it teaches, tend to weaken the be. lief in revealed religion, by their apparent inconsistency wiih the scriptural globe, — Aet5, in the work of a dignit&ry of the church, writing, ex cathedra^ from the head quarters of ortho. doxy, they will find the amplest assurances thatiheir impression is not merely erroneous, but the very reverse of the truth : for that, while its discoveries are not in any degree at vananoe with the correct interpretation of the Mosaic narrative, there exists no science which can produce more powerful evidence in support of natural religion — none which will be found a mor« potent i\uxiliary to revelation, by exalting our conviction, of the pov/er, and wisdom and goodness of the Creator. •♦Several hypotheses have been proposed, with a view of re. conciling the phenomena of geology, with the brief account of creation which we find in the fiook of Genesis and others. It has been plausibly stated, that the Six Days of Creation must, each of them, ^ > understood to imply not as now, a single re. volution of the Globe, but some other cylic period of unknown extent. Dr. Buckland, however, prefers that explanation which is supported by the high authority of Dr. Pusey, the Re. gius Professor of Hebre\ir in Oxford, and has the sanction of Dr. Chalmers, Bishop Gleig, and other eminent contemporary divines, — namely, that the phrase employed in the first words of Genesis, *In the beginning God created the Heaven and the earth,* may refer to an epoch antecedent to the 'first day,' subs*, quently spoken of in the fifth verse, and that during this indefi. ▼I. I v nite interval,comprisIng, perhaps, millions and millions of yeaiw, all the physical operutionB disclosed by geology were going on. Many of the Fathers quoted by Professor Pusoy, appear to have thus interpreted the commencement of the sacred history, understanding from it that a considerable interval took place between the original creation of the univerte, related in the first verse, and that series of events of which an account is given in the third and following verses. «> < Accordinglv,' savs Professor Pusey, *in some old editions of the English Bible, where there are no divisions into verses, you actually find a break at the end of what is now the second verse; and in Luther's Bible (Wittenburg, 1557) you have in addition the figure I placed against the third verse, as being the beginnmg of the account of the creation on the first day. This is just tho sort ot confirmation which one wished for, because, though ono would shrink from the impiety of bending the lun. guage of God*B Book to any other than its obvious meaning, we cannot help fearing lest we might be unconseiously influenced by the fl<'ating opinions of our own day, and therefore turn the more anxiously to those who explained Holy Scripture before these theories existed.' — Note^ p. 25. "Thus all difficulty arismg from the immense antiquity of the Globe attested by Geology is at once removed. The cir- vumstances related in the succeeding verses must be understood as referring to those immediate changes by which the surface of the earth was prepared for the reception of man. — Just as the facts disclosed by astronomy, wilhout detracting ought from the credit of the inspired historian, prove that the sun, and moon, and planetary bodies must have existed previous to the ' fourth day,' on vrY ich he first mentions them as * made,' or appointed to serve the office of * signs and seasons, and days and years ;' so Geology in no degree contradicts the real mean- ing of the text, by proclaiming the fact that the air, the earth, and the waters, were peopled by living creatures for innumer. able ages before that epoch in the world's history — which the •acred historian alone contemplates." Under the sanction of this confirmation of the con> struction I had put on the first verse of Genesis, in my original manuscript, formed between 1819 and 1825, (and which is now greatly enlarged by the addition of the notes containing an account of the late geological' f ion of the con- Genesis, in my 1819 and 1825, the addition ol- Q late geological vu. discovencs, and observations upon them,) 1 now pre. sent this work to the public of Upper Canada, and con- clude this preface with the sublime description of Eternal Wisdom given us in the 8th chapter of Pro- verbs ; and which, I trust, will justly apply to the great additional light which the modern discoveries in pneu- matic science are enabled to confer on the cosmogony of the creation. " The Lord possessed mo in the beginning of his way, be- fore his works of old, — v. 22. " I was sot up from everlasting, from the beginning, or oven the earth was. — v. 23. (Say before the Combustion of the G asses, as shown in this vork.) '* Whbn there were no depths, I was brought forth ; when there were no fountams abounding with water. — v. 24. (At ths Combustion of the Gasses, as shown in this work.) '* When he prepared the heavens, I wag there ; when he set a compass upon the face of the depth ;" — v. 27. (Say after tiier Combustion of the Gasses, as shown in this work.) HENRY TAYI>0R. ToROKTo, Nov. 22, I83e. ^* AN ATTEMPil TO FORM A SYSTEM ■ / Of THB CREATION OF OUR GLOBE, to. In the year of our Lord 1819, I returned to the land of my birth, the Canadas, after an absence of nigh forty years in England and Nova Scotia, during which, I had undergone great misfortunes in an extensive line of mercantile business. The pleasing sensadons I felt on this return to my native country, may have been experienced by many ; the intensity with which I felt them, may have been occasioned by so long an absence ; and having now,as it were, fallen into the calm and pure resort of nature, the woods of Lower Canada, I was never more happy ihan in the study of her works. From early youth I had been fond of the science of chemistry ; and now, some books of geology fell into my hands : with them I frequently compared the appearances I met with in my walks, which, being in unison with these books, gradually confirmed me in the opinion, that our earth was originally formed in a fluid, and was deposited from it. In the treatise on chemistry by Professor Chap- tal, I found an account of the chaotic system of creation of the ancients ; by which it is supposed il ^l 10 that the chaotic mixture, being formed, the various substances were attracted to each other, by the laws of mutual affinity, and precipitated. On frequent reflection, however, on this theory, and contrasting it with the general state of the depositions of the earth in strata and laminae, it appeared to me to be totally insufficient to account for these appearances : had a chaotic mixture been formed by the Creator, containing in solution all the various geological bodies, and had nothing more been required for their formation, but the operation of their affinities and attractions, these must have taken place immediately, and they would be found deposited in homogenous, and exclusive masses, according to their various affinities and gravities : but the formations are generally found in alternate layers and laminae of frequently mixed substances, and bear the certain marks, not only of being depo- sited from a fluid, but also, of a gradual and mixed deposition, at periods probably of immense distance from each other. This reflection led me to conceive that these depositions were gradually produced by some permanent and continually operating cause. In the above mentioned work of Chaptal, I had found and been much struck with the beautiful and interesting theory he has given of the formation of the various primitive earths and many salts, metals and mineral substances, by the processes of vege- tation, which are found on the decomposition of those vegetables by analysis and combustion : I was also aware, that vast tracts of the earth are formed by vegetable, animal and marine depositions^ and bemg on« day occupied in reading attentively j 'I the various her, by the d. this theory, state of the [ laminaB, it t to account lixture been solution all othing more le operation must have lid be found ive masses, d gravities : in alternate [substances, jeing depo- and mixed tse distance to conceive oduced by mg cause. )tal, I had autiful and rmation of ilts, metals s of vege- )osition of 3Ustion : I earth are epositions^ ttentively 11 the account of the creation in the first chapter of Genesis, the waters there in mentioned forced themselves strongly on my attention and repeated consideration, until at last, the idea grew upon me, that the geological bodies of the earth were, some- how or other, produced in these waters. That the earth was formed in h. fluid, I now felt thoroughly convinced of; that a great part of it, consisted of vegetable and animal depositions, even almost to the tops of the highest mountains, as stat- ed by the geologists, seemed to me a proof, that these marine vegetables aod animals must have pre- viously existed in waters whicN produced these de- positions ; and, as no inundation or deluge is suffi- cient to account for these universal appearances of the formations in the earth ; therefore, the waters or oceans mentioned in the first of Genesis appear- ed to me the only, and the truest sources, by which we can account for them. During my reading and reflections on this* sub- ject, and previous to my determining to form a Theory of the Creation, Archdeacon Paley's Evi- dences of Natural Religion fell into my hands, in which the atheistical doctrines of chance, and also, the notions of BuflTon, of the earth's formation by a fragment knockt off'by a Cometfrom the sun^ is related, and commented on by the Archdeacon. I shall therefore, previously to advancing any thing more on the system of Creation I had gradual- ly formed in my own mind, beg leave to make some observations on those doctrines of chance formation, and thus endeavour to clear the way for a system, I trust, more consistent with reason, and with our r«Iigion. ) 12 N ** Amongst inanimate substances (says Paley in age 63 of his Theology of Nature or Evidences of atural Religion,) a clod, a pebble, a liquid drop, might be, (but never was a watch a telescope, or organised body of any kind, answering i valuable purpose by a complicated mechanism,) tho effect of chance : in no assignable instance hath such a thing existed without intention, some where." Now, it appears to me very singular, that Paley, after having so clearly exposed the absurdity of this theory of chance, should have thus conceded the possibility of a clod, a pebble, or a liquid drop, being the product of it : a clod is a piece or part of the earth ; a pebble is a fragment of some rock rounded by the waters ; a liquid drop is a part of those waters. The same cause then, that produced •the earth and seas, produced also the clod, pebble, and drop. But, can there be any doubt that the earth itself contains marks of design and intelligence ? That all its vegetables and animals contain marks of de- sign, He has proved : now we cannot refuse the «ame evidence of design in the formation of the earth Olid seas, if it were solely as a matrix or habitation for these plants and animals ; and, among the evi- dences of design which these last exhibit, I beg leave to mention one which I believe, has escaped the ob- ^ servation of the Archdeacon : it is the amazing va- ' rieties exhibited in ev».ry species of these plants and animals. Had they been solely the offspring of a "blind conatus," there would, probably, have been but one species of each of them. But their vast va- rieties «hew a master and designing hand to havo 13 I directed their formation. But the evidence of de- sign which the earth exhibits, is not confined to its own formation ; iliis evidence is much more strong when we find and consider it as a part of a system of planets revolving in known periods round a central sun, whose light and heat are evidently the intend- ed sustainers of the life and enjoyments of the plants and inhabitants existing on this family of planets. It is also stau'd in page 92 of the above work, that Builbn considers the planets to have been " shivered off the sun by some stroke of a comet." Paley adds, " that ho nevc-r could see the difference between the anti(]nated ' System of Atoms,' and BufTon's * Organic Blolecules ;' " and that " this ])hilosopher having made a planet, by knocking off from the sun a piece of melted glass, in conse- quence of the stroke of a comet, and having set it in motion by the same stroke, both round its own axis and the sun, finds his next difficulty to be, how to bring plants and animals upon it," &;c. N6w, as to the solid parts of the earth ; allow- ing glass to be composed of a variety of materials, yet, I believe no part of the interior of the earth is discovered to be vitreous, except in the vicinity of volcanic mountains, or where these have previ- ously existed. How then has this glass, of which Buffbn supposes the earth to have been formed; how has it been metamorphosed into the vast va- riety of mineral products which geology discovers to us ? The internal substance of the earth down to its centre, is supposed to be granite or bodies of greater density ; and neither granite, nor the n^ore 14 oxtcrnal fornmtions bear any resemblance to vi- treous or volcanic matter. But, if even the solid parts of our earth, will not support such a theory, how are we to account by it lor our waters ? Is it in the midst of the molten glass of a burning sun, we are to look for them ? Water, even in a state of vapour, could not exist there, but must have been driven off to immense distances, or else decomposed by the sun's fire ; Water, however, is said to constitute three-fourths of the Earth's surface, and the total inability of this theory or supposition, to account for its production, appears to me decisive against its foundation in reality. (Vide 1st i^ 2nd paragraph of Note 4th.) •I I shall now notice the opinions on Chance or A the- ism, as causes to account for the productions of na- ture in our globe. The Organic Molecules of Buffon are thus stated by Paley, in page 427 of the above Work, Evi- dences of Natural Religion, namely : "we are to suppose the universe replenished with particles endowed with life, but without Organization of their own, and endowed, also, with a tendency to marshal themselves into organized forms." It appears to me almost impossible that the author of this doctrine, if it be Buftbn, could rest satisfied with this cause of Creation ; because, al- though it should be allowed that these particles of life could infuse themselves into organized bodies, we naturally enquire, how came these particles themselves into the universe ? This is the secret, undiscoverable without allowing an " unknown ■if I I t 15 blancc to vi- cuuse.** If Buffon would account for the existence of these particles by chance, I say, that from the time of their finding their way into these Molecules, or organized forms, there is so much, and so con- stantly exhibited in every one of these forms, what we call, in plain language, intelligence and design to produce good and wise ends ; that the term Chance, in the sense in which it would be employed by these Atheistical writers, completely compre- hends intelligence and design ; for these are found inseparable from these organized forms ; therefore, the Doctrine of Chance, instead of confuting, proves the existence of an Unknown Creating Cause. Were the term Chance to be understood merely in the common acceptation of the term, as existing, for instance, in many of the events :>? life, it will still always be considered as too libsurb and im- potent to account for the productions of Nature, because it is not in the nature of the human mind to rest satisfied with what, I trust, may be fairly call- ed a BufFonery system of Creation. Now, therefore, to finish with this, and with the notion of the planets being knocked off from the Sun ; to account for their Creation thereby, without an Intelligent Creator, I must say, I feel it to be a daring thing of this or any writer, to have attempt- ed the overthrow of the established opinions of all Christian nations, as set forth in the Scriptures handed down to us from the people whom it ap- pears to me, were chosen by the design of Heaven to preserve mankind in the faith and worship of one Creator, and which are, I believe, supported in r' '! I- 16 their principal facts by the immortal Newton, io his system of the Universe, and certainly believed by him. Previous to thus presuming to overthrow thig sacred religion, it appears to me, this author should have formed a system less replete with absurdity, but fortunately too much so, to produce extensively any evil effects. Christians, in general, are fixed in their notions of the true cause of all they see, taste, and feel around them, and of their own ex- istence. The Jewish Nation was taught by a re- ligion which, from the days of Adam, had been fol- lowed by mankind, — a belief in one Almighty Creator of all things. This belief had nearly, how- ever, disappeared from the earth in succeeding ages. Men, enervated by the cfFccts of those hot climates, and sunk in consequent sensuality, were tempted to throw off* the wholesome restraints of a pure religion, and gradually fell into an idolatry, whose ministers, probably, permitted these sensual habits, to confirm their own power over these peo- ple. The Jews, alone, had preserved the worship of one AlmightyCreator, until their prosperity, after the deliverance from Egyptian bondage, sunk them into the same idolatrous practices as their fore- fathers. And here I beg leave to observe, that this re- peated defection of the Jews, and of the rest of mankind, from the worship of one God, appears to me a strong proof that Deism alone, in its purest state, is not sufficient to prevent mankind from fall- ing into idolatrous worship. But, the Saviour pro- mised in the Scriptures by the inspired writers, 17 il Newton, in ainly believed overthrow thif author should r'lih absurdity, ce extensively eral, arB fixed all they see, their own ex- lught by a re- , had been fol- )ne Almighty d nearly, how- in succeeding: of those hot isuality, were restraints of a an idolatry, these sensual /ec these peo- the worship osperity, after ye, sunk them as their fore- that this re- )f the rest of d, appears to in its purest :ind from fall- Saviour pro- ired writers, o ;i 't?; arose at length to astonish mankind, and to bring them back for ever from that idolatry to a religion which alone is worthy of the highest degree ot in- telligence to which the mind of man can arrive ; a religion which, while it allows him the most ex- tended use of that intelligence in the contemplation of the works of Creation, teaches him, also, to be contented with the limits which appear to be fixed to it ; and being convinced of the existence of an Almighty Protector, to feel the glowing pleasure of the adoration of Him to be among his purest and most comforting sensations. These cheering feelings of the heart and mind, cold and joyless Atheism is void of, and thereby its errors are proved ; because, the almost universal feeling of these emotions, and their cultivation by nations who have at all risen above idolatrous wor- ship, is a proof that these emotions came from the hands of Nature and Reason, and they appear to form the links of a chain which connects this with a future state of existence. The supporters of the Doctrine of Chance, how- ever, disdaining to be contented with the Scriptu- ral account of Creation, have formed various wild and futile notions to account for it, in order, no doubt, to seek for distinction by opposing the gene- rally received doctrines ; but finding, as I trust to have shewn, the total impotence of Chance^ of ap- petencies, PRINCIPLES of ORDER, POSSIBLE COMBI- NATIONS OF MATERIAL FORMS, and of LAWS OF NA- TURE, &c. &c., to satisfy the inquisitive mind of man, they have been obliged to conclude with t(jlL- 18 ing us, " that neither they uor we know any thintf about the matter." {Vide page 7 of Paley s Tkiclogy) But, at that very point, vihere they have thus found themselves stopt in the extension of their enquiries, is seen " the God whom we worship." There, when this proud, but false philosophy find? its ignorance begin to darken it, we have the cbar and powerful light o^ this true religion to illuminate us, and to teach us to rest satisfied with the im- penetrable veil which its author has pleased to fix between Himself and His creatures in this stage of existence. Of akin to these doctrines of chanc^ Creation is the idea of the Materiality of the Human Soul; and previous to dismissing this part of the subject, I beg leave of the reader to offer some observations on this Doctrine of Materiality. The Materialist supposes, that all the powers of the mind of man result from his Organization alone. Jt follows, then, as a natural consequence, that when this organization is destroyed, the mind is destroyed along with it. Matei alism, then, neces- sarily leads to a disbelief in a future state. Now, in no parts of Nature do we find facaltios bestowed which are not generally productive of certain purposes to these parts ; therefore, if mf;n were destined solely for exirtence on this earth : if his thoughts were solely tht effects of the organi- zation of his frame ; is it not probable his thoughts would have been confined lo the actual sphere of his destined existence ? V/ould he not have beei^ 19 Tinabio to form those high imaginations and \\odc» of eternal happiness in more perfect regions t For, if we may reason from the vast body of evidrice of her works, Nature does nothing, nor bestows nothing, in vain > she never appears to act with deception ; therefore would not have given to man of all ages and nations those hopes of future happiness merely to disappoint them. " I am po- sitive I have a soui,^' says Laurence Sterne, " nor shall all the books with which Materialists have pestered the world, ever convince me to the contrary.** The vast powers of intellect and of science, by which man has been enable.d to observe and to trace so exactly, the astonishing systems of the heavenly bodies ; those high passions and thoughts of future bliss which he is thereby led to hope for, in some such regions, partake too much of the na- ture of Spirit to suffer us to think they are solely produced by a more perfect organization than i* bestowed on the horse, the mule, or the ass. It, moreover, has been proved by the anatomy of the brain of the Ourang Outang, an animal ap- proaching nearer to the human species than any other, that its brain exactly resembles that of the human species ; and it is said, *' it is surprising this resemblance is productive of so few advantages ; the tongue, and all the organs of the voice are si- milar, and yet the animarls dumb ; the brain ff formed in the same mannori and yet the Creature wants reason 5 an evident proof, [as Buffbn finely observes,] that no arrangement of matter will givs mindf and that the bbd^i^i how nicety soever fori^d^ '■-./^^.'/^ C/. O"^^ :J' 20 is funned to very limited ends, when tlicre is not infused a soul to direct its operations ;" — and I am the more happy in .^ this quotation, as it shews thut Buflfon has indeed the redeeming quaHty of not acceding to, but of disproving, the degrading Doc- trine of ImmatcriaUtv. We feel indeed less sur- prised at the invention of »uch a doctrine, when we are informed who arc its abetters or authors. Persons, who, in the practice of their art, having been long habituated to dissections of the human body, have thereby become more apt to form their notions from their eyes than from the reflections of their minds, have sought to make the world be- Heve, that the superiority of the mind of man over other animals, arose merely from a moro perfect organization of the brain ; and such an assertion reminds us of the Alchemists who sought for the J Philosophers' Stone in some of the most loathsome objects in nature. Had the Materialists watched and studied the operations of their own hearts and minds, in the hours of calm contemplation; had they allowed these parts of their frames to exert a due influence over their opinions, they would, pro- bably, have felt the force of the great jxiet's asser- tion, " 'Tis the Divinity which stir* within us." They may, indeed, have carried their anatomi- cal science and skill to that exact point where body meets spirit ; they may have discovered the pre- cious matrix in which this "immortal spirit" is destined at present to reside ; but, they would not thus have presumed to degrade its nature and its future destiny. In rme» this material doctrine of the mind may \ N, V 21 % t well be said to savour too much of the shop, and no well cultivated mind can, I think, for a moment assent to so degrading a doctrine ; — and I shall con- clude this subject with an observation I have made on the separate existence of mind from body, even in this world. When two persons converse toge- ther, the ideas of their minds pass from the organs of speech, through the air intervening between the two persons : in this passage, therefore, mind exists separate from the body from whence it came. It is conveyed, indeed, by the vibrations of the parti- cles of air it passes through, but it certamly has, during that period, an existence separate from the body and organs it proceeded fi'om. Mind, there- fore, can exist separate from its matrix, and does not seem to be entirely dependent on it for that existence. I now resume the narration of the course of thought which has led me to form the pit. ?ent at- tempt at a theory of the Creation of our system, and, by analogy, of the other systems of th« heavenly bodies. Being, as before stated, convinced the earth had been originally formed in water the enquiry, then, naturally suggested itself, what waters we had any historical account of which could produce this effect? The chaotic liquor of the ancients, I trust to have proved, is incompetent to account for the general geological appearances, and therefore fails. The waters of the Deluge can only account for certain changes in the earth's surface, which they may have occasioned, and which, no doubt, give proofs 'Il 22 of the reality of that Delude. But, the proof of formation in a i^uid reach far below the possible effects of an inundation which lasted only one year. The vast masses of marine depositions must have required numerous ages to accumulate, and even the granite massgives proofs of formation in a fluid, by the chrystals and heterogeneous substances it consists of; and this stupendous mass, which is supposed to form the whole interior of the globe, must have required a correspondent time for that formation. The only waters, therefore, with which History furnishes us to account for these phenomena, are certainly the waters of Genesis. I then proceeded to enquire if the scriptural account of these waters would warrant the conclusion that the earth was formed in them by the deposition of the strata and otht/ rocks which the latest discoveries in the science of geology have pronounced it to consist of. After a long and mature consideration I conceiv- ed, that the 1st verse of Genesis, " In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth,'* will not only warrant the above conclusion ; but, perhaps, also a like formation of all the planets and suns of other systems; by the highly natural causes and effects of those laws, which the latest discoveries of Geology and Pneumatic Chemistry have found to exist. I further considered, that if the scriptural account of Creation could thus be reconciled to those disco- veries ; — if the Geology of the whole earth could .thus be brought in proof of the reality and neces- ca] U sci tlu cei 23 «ary existence of those waters ; the doubts of the Unbeliever might yield to it, and the authority of scripture acquire new forces. "In tlio beginning (lod created the heavens and tlie earth." Now, the term beginning points to no sjh'cijic point of time ; and I have therefore con- ccivoil it may have been ages previous to the lime of the reparation of the cartii from the waters men- tioned in the ensuing verses ; and, that during thesn 4jto powder ; that these agents, acting on and percolating through them in various degrees, will reduce them into oeds of chalk, or lime stone, or marble, and, I think it not improbable, the chalk and lime stone formations of the earth have been, in the course of ages formed in this manner. Again, " where the tree falls there it la)^," says the rro- verbs. Any person who has seen and noticed the aboriginal forests of the earth, will have observed these trees in various stages of decay — many of them reduced to a state of dust or earth ; and those causes, in the course of time form hills and hillocks. In accounting for the origin of peat earth and mo- rasses of black soil in Britain, a late writer has, •A "i 27 t found in these 1^ accounted for. I forms as when but, on taking ible powder, nountains, ha> u mains in previ- the earth's sur- e air and rains, rted into their jorporated with bodies. Thus, e found to con- Is as every ma- 3 and carbonic that when the d upon by the 1 fires and mi- ns, and be cou- nts, acting on arious degrees, or lime stone, able, the chalk rth have been, anner. Again, says the Fro- nd noticed the ave observed icay — many of th; and those s and hillocks, arth and mo- e writer has, J. I 4 I 4 therefore, very properly, I think, assigned their origin to arise from the gradual falling and decay of trees in ancient times, which, falling in marshy or swampy places, have decayed and acquired their black colour. In a great many parts of America, it is well known large tracts of land are found in this state, being covered by masses of black earth of various degrees of consistence, from 2 to feet deep. The subsoil frequently clay. In an article lately published in one of the English papers, there is an account, confirming the opinion, that part of the coast of Australia, in the South Seas, has been entirely formed by the manure of birds called the Pettrel, found there in such astonishing quantities, that flocks of them are seen to cover a vast extent of the atmosphere for days together. These facts, therefore, ofler corroborating tes- timony, that large tracts of the earth can, and have been formed, by the depositions of vegetables and aminals. {See Note 1.) In a Geological work lately published in England, we have the following account of the order of suc- cession of the different layers of rocks which comr pose the crust of the earth : — Instances where found. A. Vegetable soil. I Mouth of the Thames B. Sand,Clay,Gravel,with > bones of some species as no^ exist. and other rivers. 28 I "J I !jl|| C. Deep beds of Gravel,'^ krge loose blocks oft Surface of many parts , Sand, all containing I of England, and es- bones of animals be- [ pecialfy the east and longing to species now extinct south-western parts. TERTIARY STRATA. p. Sand, Clay, Pebbles," beds of Sand, white Sand-stone, many sea ( Shells, bones of ex- ( tinct species of ani- I mals. J E. Alternations of Lime^ Stone,containing fresh I water Shells,Clays of I different qualities, and ^ Lime Stones contain- ing Marine shells. F. Thick beds of Clay,ma-') ny Sea Shells, beds of Lime Stone, remains * of extinct species of plants and fruits, land and amphibious ani- mals. >Vi; Hampstead Heath, Bagshot Heath,coast of Suffolk & Norfolk, the stone of which Windsor Castle is built. Isle of Wight in England. Many places round London, and a great >• part of Essex and north-east of Kent, Isle of Sheppy. SECONDARY STRATA. G. Chalk with Flints do. without do. "^ Dover CliffsjBrighton, ( Hertfordshire, Ham- I borough Head, in J Yorkshire, England. 1 .^ A, 29 H. a. Chalk Marie* b. Green Sand c. Thick beds of Clay, d. Yellow Sand with beds of Iron. Many parts of s. coast Many parts of Kent and Sussex. The Wolds of Kent, Surrey and Sussex. Neighbourhood of Hastings, in the isle of Purbeck. s In an account of the Geological appearances . from the Lands' End in England towards the vici- nity of London, the following facts are stated : — The principal groups of secondary rocks, from the primary strata to the Chalk group, form the. upper or more recent members of the division. The Chalk group, the Oolite group, the Red Marie group, the Coal group, the mountain Lime Stone group, the old Red Sand Stone group, the . Graiwacke group, are of the following thicknesses : Mountain Lime Stone group, 900 feet thick* Old Red Sand Stone group, 1500 feet thick.. Coal group, 1700 feet thick. Red Marie group contains mines of salt and marbles, alabaster and magnesia, with marine ske- letons : its thickness is 2100 feet. The Oolite group contains about twelve alterna- tions of subordinate beds, or systems of beds, con- sisting of Lime Stones of different qualities, and of Clays: their united thickness being about 2600 feet, of which 1100 are formed of two beds ofCIav of 5 and 600 feet each. The whole group contains a vast abundance of animal remainSf almost exclu- sively marine. h 30 The Chalk group is separated from the Oolite group by several beds of Sands, Clays, and Sand Stones, and, including them, is 1900 feet thick. It extends irom Flamborough Head, in Yorkshire, to Weymouth. The whole group abounds in organic remains of the same classes as Winford in the Oolite group. Thus it appears, that both the tertiary and se- condary formations of the Earth, contain vast masses of the remains of marine productions, many of them belonging to species now extinct. Many of these latter are said to have been of enormous sizes. The Chalk and Lime Stone formations, as I have above stated, may have been formed of the disinte- gration of marine shells, which had been deposited perhaps for ages previous to these which yet pre- serve their organic forms, as we daily find many of them in a state of disintegration, and their che- mical analysis is precisely the same with Chalk and The Coal formations must probably have been Lime Stone. (See 4th paragraph of Note 2.) produced by the decomposition of marine vegeta- bles, as they reach far too mudi below the surface of the earth to suppose them to be formed by those of a terrestrial species. i ■ .. ' • ' Now, then, to refer to the words of Cuvier, " the levels on which marine productions are now form- ed, are far above the level of the ocean, and at heights to which the sea could not reach by the action of ainv known cause." -•■^ym.ir-rflrx^'^'^-Hr.'tj'.tX 31 To what cause can we then ascribe this pheno- menon, but to the substantial, plain, and simple one, the original formation of the earth ? All its geolo- gical appearance give evidence of formation in a fluid. Of no waters have we any record suliicient to account for these facts, save the waters record- ed in Genesis. These, therefore, forcibly press themselves on our attention, 'and appear to me perfectly competent to clear up all these pheno- mena of Creation. But water alone, that is, holding no extraneous substances in sdution, either partial or complete, deposiU nothing. All its depositions are found to proceed from extraneous bodies. The petrifying power of certain waters, of which such fabulous opinions have formerly existed, is solely owing to the deposition of earths or salts it had prev'ously dissolved, completely or partially. We shall, therefore, proceed to state our humble conceptions of those laws of nature, which the Creator may have chosen for the gradual formation of our earth in the waters of Genesis, on the ground work mentioned above, regarding the Ist verse of the 1st chapter of that book. Genesis, 1st chap. 1 verse. — " In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.*' I wish first to premise, that, as I consider this scriptural account of Creation, to be the only one by which we can,naturally and reasonably, account for the geological phenomena of our earth ; so, the only thing in which I differ from the, hitherto, re- ceived opinions of that Creation is, in the construc- tion which, (from a desire to account for these I ! > II' :!«.h' If 32 phenomena, and to reconcile them with the scrip- tural account,) I have put upon the meaning of this Ist verse of Genesis. As before observed, I had in the course of these Rtudies of nature, been led by them, and by read* ing and reflection, gradually to come to such a con- struction of that verse as the following : that the term, " The beginning," pointing to no specific time, so it may refer to numerous ages previous to the separation of the watfers from the waters mention- ed in the 6th, 7th, and 9th verses ; and I moreover consider, that every man hath a perfect right to form such a construction of the Word of God a«« his understanding, after mature reflection on His works, and a diligent study of them, may, by that understanding be led to, and more especially when his design is good, when he conceives he is, there- by, not only adding weight and authority to these scriptures, by bringing the evidence of the geology of every part of the globe to their confirmation, but, perhaps, silencing thereby the infidelity of the sceptic,and (as he may hope) exhibiting,in a stronger light, the Power, Wisdom, and Glory of his Creator. In the 2nd verse of Genesis it is said, ** And the Earth was without form, and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the Waters." By this verse, it would appear, the Earth was completely covered by the Waters : otherwise, the Spirit would have been recorded as having also moved upon the land ? and the 9th verse is con- firmative of this circumstance, for it says, " And God said, let the Waters under the Heavens be 33 ffathered together unto one place, and let the Dry Land appear ; and it was so." This event, then, I consider to have happened many a^es after tbd time of the 1st verse ; which verse, 1 further con- sider, to point exactly to that period to which the Psalmist David, in the 102nd rsalm, 25th verse, refers : ** Thou Lord in the beginning hast laid the founditions of the Earth /' and I consider this foundation to nave been the formation of the aque- ous globes of our theory. We now proceed to our statement. The seas, or globes of water, mentioned above to have been formed by those gasses which the mo- dern discoveries in pneumatic chemistry prove water to be formed of, and being destmed by the Creator to produce habitable Earth or Land, we shall con- ceive these aqueous globes to have been endowed by Him for that purpose, with amazing prolific powers of life, both of the vegetable and animal nature. The remains of many of those marine animals, whose skeletons have been discovered in^the earth, of a species never known to have inhabited our seas, are of gigantic stature and dimensions, as compared to those of any existing species. Tne marine Shells, the Ch J^s, and Lime Stone formations, which I consider to n. ♦ e been produced, as above observed, by the gradual disintegration of these shells in the course of sufficient ages : the vast Coal formations, also, prove the amazing mas- ses of animal and vegetable life, which we shall ' now suppose, according to our theory, to have ex- isted in those Waters of Genesis ; and for proofs of 34 Mrhlcli we accordingly refer our readers to the geological statements in the preceding pases. To account further for the primary earths, Lime, SiLBX or Sand, Sand Stones, Flints, Gravels, Clays or Alluminou8£arths,TerraPondero6a, Maonesian Earths, Salt Formations, Metals, Mineral Substances of all kinds, and the Rocrs and other Substances composed of them and of the Primary Earths, we shall now proceed to a statement of those experiments, opinions, and theo» ries, which have been performed and maintained by several eminent chemical philosophers on this important head. In the treatise on Chemistry by Professor Chap- tal, mentioned in pages 1st and 2nd, the following facts are stated to have resulted from the analysis made by him of certain vegetables : ** The herb Patience affords sulphur : vegetables, in their analysis, likewise present us with certain metals, as Iron, Gold, and Manganese. The Iron forms nearly one-twelfth of the ashes of hard- wood. It may be extracted by the magnet ; but it is sel- dom in a naked state, but is combined with the acids of vegetation. The Iron is not imbibed from the Earth, but is FORMED BY THE VEGE- TATIVE PROCESS. Lime, constantly enouch, forms seven-tenths of the fixed residue of vegetable incineration, usually combined with the carbonic acid. Next to Lime, Alumine is the most abun- dant earth in vegetables ; and next, Magnesia. — Silicious earth likewise exists, but less abundantly ; least common of all is Barytes or Terra Ponderosa.^ 35 . As an evident and sufficient proof that all the products of vegetables are produced by the water, and perhaps the air, necessary for their growth, I extract also the following observation of Professor Chaptal : »* It appears proved by Van Helmont, that vegetables can live and grow with only air and water. He planted a willow weighing 59 lbs., watered it with distilled water five years. It in- creased to 169 lbs. : the earth it was grown in lost only two ounces." If one vegetable be thus proved to acquire its growth from water and air, the strong probability is, that, as Chaptal says, ** all others do," and by the uniformity of the laws of Nature, we may conclude this law applies generally to the vegetative process. {See Note 15.) Thus, although Sir Humphrey Davy supposes, but does not assert, the fact, that these earths are taken up by the vegetation from the soils around them ; yet, as he does in another part of his writ- ings admit, that all substances, before entering the tubes of vegetables in nutrition, must be reduced to a state of complete solution in a liquid before that absortion can take place ; and as it is well known that argillaceous earth, or allumine, silex or sand, and magnesia, are almost insoluble in water, and that lime is only soluble in very small quantities ; 1 have therefore concluded, that such a perfect and sufficient solution, as Davy admits to be necessary, is impracticable, and, therefore, that the assertion, grounded on the forementioned experiments by Chaptal and Van Helmont, namely, that these Earths, Metals, and Minerals, are really and en- tirely the products of the vegetative process, ig 36 iliilli much more probable ; and I am the more confirm- ed in this probability by the following facts and reasoning upon them : Ist. As oxygen, we know, exists in a solid state, in all the oxyds, so it is not impossible, that the bases of these oxyds, the metals, and several of the primary earths, may be formed by the vegetative process, as the French Geologist, Chaptal, asserts, " to replace the constant waste that takes place of the crust of the earth, by the rains, streams, and rivers/* One hundred pounds of Lead is, I believe, found, by calcination or oxydation, to augment in weight to one hundred and ten pounds, thus absorbing ten pounds of solid oxygen from the oxygenous gas of the atmosphere, which can be recovered by deoxy- da^ion. Pit Coal contains a great quantity of Hydrogen, most probably in a solid state : Pot-ash ha^ yielded to Sir Humphrey Davy a metallic but- ton ; and is, therefore, an oxyd, and also contains oxygen in a solid state. 2nd. The Schisti, or Slate Mountains, are said also to be formed by the decomposion of vegetables, and the Coal formatio is, also, to consist of the residue of vegetables, probably charred by a close heat, and must, therefore, be formed of the carbo and constituent Gasses of those vegetables. If such dense substances can be thus, in part, com- pounded of a gazeous substance, there is an equal probability, that the gazes separated by the vege- tative processes from the air and water necessary to their nutrition, may compose the Primary Earths, Salts, Minerals, and Metallic substances 37 Xs lore confirm- ig facts and i a solid state, ible, that the several of the iie vegetative .ptal, asserts, akes place of streams, and ►elieve, found, jnt in weight Eibsorbing ten ^cnous gas of •ed by deoxy- qiiantity of ate : Pot-ash metallic but- also contains ins, are said If vegetables, Insist of the jarred by a Irmed of the vegetables. part, com- is an equal [y the vege- necessary Primary substances obtained from them by decomposition or incinera- tion ; and I think it not improbable that future ex- periments may prove, that all the primitive earths, metals, and mineral substances, are composed of the primary elements, as we are now philosophi- cally bound to consider them. Oxygen, Iivdrooek, Azote, combined in proportions innumerable as these products themselves, and from which variety of proportion they receive their distinctive charac- teristics. (See Note 9.) 3rd. As an important and additional proof, that the process of vegetation certainly generates and produces one of the most abundant and most dense primary earths in nature, namely, Silex, Siliceous JEarth, or, as 1 shall call it, the Candy principle, I extract the following from the Elements of the Science of Botany, by the celebrated and indefati- gable Linnaeus. " In many parts of the East Indies, there has long been a medicine in high repute, called * Tabas- heer* obtained from a substance found in the hol- low stem of the Bamboo. It has undergone a chemical examination, and proved to be an earthly substance, principally of a flinty nature ; this sub- stance is also found in the Bamboo in England. In the hot house of Dr. Pitcairn, in Islington, subse- quently to this time, there was found, in one of the joints of a Bamboo, which grew there, a solid peb- , ble, about the size of a pea. The pebble was of an irregular form, of a dark brown or black inters nally : it was reddish brown, of a close dull tex- ture, much like some martial siliceous stones. In one corner were shining particles, which appeared 38 to be chrystals, but too minute to be distinguished by the microscope. This substance was so hard as to cut glass. The cuticle, or exterior covering of straw, has also a portion of matter in its com- position, from which, when burnt, it makes an ex- quisitely fine powder for giving the last polish to marble, a use to which it has been employed time immemorial, without the principle being philoso- phically known. In the great heat in the East Indies, it is not uncommon for large tracts of reeds to be set on fire on their motion by the wind, which I conjecture must arise from the flinty substance of their leaves rubbing against each other. These facts cannot avoid presenting to the mind at one view the boundless Laws of Nature, while a simple vegetable is secreting the most volatile andevenes- cent perfumes, it also secretes a substance, which, is an ingredient in the primeval mountains of the globe.'' These facts, which have produced the assent of this Prince of Botanists, to the formation of a first rate primary earth, by the process of vegetation, are, I think, sufliicient proofs, in conjunction with those above stated, that all the primary earths, the metals, and mineral substances, and, of course, all the rocks xiompounded of them, have been origi- nally formed by the process of vegetation, and aniraalization. (See IS/ote 1, 2, 3, and 14.) Vast tracts of the interior of the earth have, as above, been shewn to consist of the remains of marine animals. The Chalk and Lime Stone formations I trust to hav« shewn, havje also resulted from the same re- 39 iistinguishcd vas so hard 'ior covering r in its com- lakes an ex- last polish to iployed time eing philoso- in the East acts of reeds wind, which substance of her. These mind at one hile a simple ', and evenes- mce, which, tains of the he assent of on of a first vegetation, notion with V earths, the ' course, all been origi- tation, and 4.) th have, as remains of is I trust to e same re- mains; and also, that the Coal formations have been produced by the residue of marine vegetables and a charring heat, as well as the Schisti or Slate Mountains : as, therefore, the proofs narrated in the foregoing pages, and the Notes referring to them, are, I trust, convincing, that every part of the earth has been formed in a Fluid ; that many parts are visibly the remains of vegetable and ani- mal decomposition, and that most of the geological bodies are resolvable into the elements of vegetable and animal life ; we now arrive at the conclusion, THAT THE PROCESSES OP VeGETATION, AND OF Animalization, were the Machinery chosen by THE FIRST CAUSE for gradually producing, in the course of sufficient 'AGES, IN THE WA- TERS OF Genesis, the various generations of Vegetable and Animal Life, which, by their Growth, (decay ; their Death, decomposition ; AND Depositions have produced all the Ge- ological Bodies of which our Earth is com- posed. These Bodies, as they were depositing, have been attracted towards the centre of the aqueous globe by the great and universal law of attraction ; and since the separation, have, by the effects of internal fires, convulsions, or the electric power, acquired their present appearances. Thus, the Lliw of Gravity or Attraction would necessarily occasion a vast pressure towards the centre of the aqueous globes of all the particles of the geological bodies. The vegetable and animal remains of which they were formed, as stated above, would pass through various stages of fer- mentation. Heats, inflammable and other gasses, M' II 40 would be thereby generated ; and these internal fires must have been in operation, pending many of the ages required for the formation of the entire diameter of the Earth in the Waters of Genesis, Hence must have arisen, long before the separa- tion of these waters, not only internal changes in the forms and original composition of the congre- gated masses of the geological bodies, but also nu- merous commotions in the interior parts, which have produced probably many of the mountains, and must certainly have produced those depressions on the surface of the earth, which served to form the beds of the original oceans or seas, formed at the time of the separation of the waters. The electric agency, also, has probably had great influence in these internal changes, both previous to and since the time of the separation ; and on the subject of the internal and external changes in and on the Earth, I refer the reader to the attentive perusal of the Notes, but more espe- cially Notes 7, 10, 13, and 14. And as it is very remarkable, that no mention is made in the 1st of Genesis of the creation of any of the Marine Plants of the Ocean, I will conclude this part of the subject with an observation on that remarkable circumstance — namely^ — that it appears to me indicative of the pes'-' truth of the theory I have presumed to offCi v the first verse of Genesis refers to a prej tratory process of the Creation^ totally distinct in its time and nature from the separation of the waters and the primeval appearance of the dry land as recorded in the en- suing verses, which took place in the six days. 1 • '."it fol th th "N 41 Because the creation of the vast body of the ma- line plants required for the purpose of nutriment for the marine animals of those waters, who, by their death, decay, and depositions iormed part of the machinery of the Creator for producing the earth, the creation of those plants, having taken place at the beginning, as in the first verse, being the preparatnry process of the creation, by which the jDry Land was, in subsequent ages, to be pro- duced, no need was that mention should be made of their creation at the period of the separation, when the land animals and vegetables were brought into being ; for and because these marine plants were included in the record of the first verse, " In tlie beginning," &;c. {See Notes 7, 10 ^ 13.) In the preceding System of the Creation which I have ventured to form, and to which I was de- termined, as observed above, on reading the ideas stated by Archdeacon Paley to have been promul- gated to the world by BufTon and other philoso- phers, I have made some remarks on the assertion, or supposition of Buffon, that the globe we inhabit was formed by the stroke of a Comet knocking off from the ^un, as stated by Paley, n piece of molten glass, I trust to have shewn the great improbability and absurdity of this. Such a supposition would lead us to believe, that the creation of our planeta- ry system was not the gift of an all bountiful Crea- tor, but merely the effect of Chance ; and if I have proceeded to any severe reflections on its irreli- gious tendency, I trust I am warranted therein by the opinions given by Paley, of this doctrine being founded on Atheistical principles ; that is, if I 42 understand it, denying the agency of a Supreme Ruler of the Universe in the Works of Nature. An opinion, so contrary to all our natural feel- ings of religion, it appeared to me, the duty of every man to refute whose understanding should dictate to him the errors of such a system — and I hope to have shewn, that as it is completely unsatis- factory to the mind of man, in the highest state of its acquirements — so, it never can be productive of general or extensive assent ; and in the following compendium of my Theory of the Sun*s Forma- tion, I shall re-advert to tne above supposition of Buffon. THEORY OF THE SUN'S FORMATION. I now proceed, with due humility, to present to the reader a compendium of the ideas above stated, on the Sun's Formation, at the time tlie primordial waters of Genesis were created, according to the construction I have put on the 1st verse of the 1st chap, of Genesis, by the combustion of hydrogen or oxygen, or other combustible gasses, created by the first cause, as stated in page 24 of this work. I have presumed that those gasses were ignited by the electric fluid, by the blaze of comets, or other igneous bodies, and that the extrication of the light and heat, formed by the combustion of these gasses, (in order to produce the formation of the aqueou*- 43 V globes, destined thereafter, to originate the Earth, and the other Planets of our system,) that this light and heat formed the body of our sun, which formed the centre of the System, by the laws of His gra- vity and attraction. If I recollect aright, heat and light have not, as yet, been discovered to have weight; but our means of ascertaining this by experience, in the usual way, is very dubious. The bulk of z grain of heat or light may, perhaps, be sufficient to till a house ; therefore, we could, perhaps, not ascertain the fact; but heat and light are certainly sensible bodies, and therefore must have weight. Heat expands and increases the dimensions of the hardest bodies in an astonishing" manner. Light is said to travel from the Sun at the rate of twelve millions of miles a minute, and also penetrates the most dense sub- stance*. Although, therefore, the weight of these subtle agents be infinitely less than any other bodies "we know of, they are, probably, subject to the same laws, of attraction and gravity. We* may, therefore, conceive that the heat and light extricated from the combustion of these seri- form' substances, in the formation of the primordial waters, would unite and ascend, by the laws of their gravity and attraction, or by an original impulse of the Creator,* to their position in the regions of * As Light is known to exist in two separate states, namely, kitent and active ; and as we are told in the 3nd verse of Gene, sis, Darkness was on the face of the deep, it is probable the Light evolved in the combustion of the gasses was diffused through the regions of space in its latent form, and was not filicited into its active and visible state until the time of the 3rd y^THQ ; and it is remarkable^ that- the first operation of Deitv ati 44 space, and form there the body of our Sun, and that the aqueous globes, as they were formed, and were projected by the projectile force, became subject to its attractive influences. {Vide Note 16.) Whether this attraction be effected by an inhe- rent power of the Sun, or, that it may be owing in part, to the intluence of the vast stream of airi- form substance, passing towards him, to supply him w:ith fuel, I shall presently consider. I shall, however, previously make some remarks^ in addi- tion to those offered above, on the idea of Bufibi), of molten glass having formed our earth and the planets of our system. It is, I consider, impossible to conceive, tlmt glass could exi in the stupendous l^at of the sun's nre, without decomposition, that is, without return- , ing to its elementary principles. G^ass is formed in our planet of siliceous earth and pot-ash. The former we have before proved, on the authority of Linnaeus, to be composed by the vegetative process ; its parts are, therefore, formed of the gasses which the vegetable extracts from the water and air it imbibes for its nutritioa. The latter, pot-ash, has also yielded to Sir H. Davy a metallic button. It is, therefore, an oxyd, and must contain much oxygen. Siliceous earth, and pot-ash, the component parts of glass, are then, mostly composed of aeriform substance; We know^ that the diamond, which is, probably^ much more dense than siliceous earth in. ©ther the time of the separation was the evolution of Li^ht in ita ac- tive and visible state, and the collection of it into one vast fo- eus, the Sun of our system, as by the 4th ver5<». 45 forms, has been volatilised in part by burning lenseff» or by streanas of oxygen gas in a state of ignition. What can these heats be in comparison to the sun's fire? perhaps as an atom to a world. I trust, therefore, it is more consistent with the Sacred documents we have had handed down to us by our religion, with the operations of nature we are enabled to examine, with the admirable simplicity and order of the laws, by which the first cause has directed the operations of that nature, to believe, that having first formed the principles j which in the present state of our knowledge, we must call elementary, He proceeded by the com- bination of these principles, by combustion, to form the waters which were destined thereafter to produce our Earth and Planets. It is, indeed possible, that these elements, Oxy- gen, Hydrogen, and Azote, may be compounded of other final elements, of much greater energy than themselves, but the rules of science forbid us to consider that as the fact until we have found it by experiment. We have, therefore, only to carry our knowledge of these principles into our reflec- tions on the construction of our system, and with humility, praise and adoration, to conceive, that as most, or all, the geological bodies we have ana- lized, are found to consist of these principles, they may have been these with which, the First Cause, with amazing skill and effect, has operated the wonderful system of Creation He hatn bestowed on us. In the contemplation of thisCreation,and of there* cent discoveries in pneumatic chemistry I trust tohave 46 shewn the possibility, that our Sun may have been formed, at the time of the formation of the primor- dial waters of Genesis ; and as before stated, I have considered the other planets of our system, and their moons, to have been formed in the same manner at the time when, by the creative mandate, the combustion of thcgasses took place, and which, I consider, to be meant and recorded by the Ist verse of 1st chap, of Genesis. So I likewise con- ceive that our Sun, was formed at the same time, by the vast body of heat and light disengaged by the stupendous combustion, and that having found his position in the regions of infinite space, accord- ing to the laws of his nature, he exerted his at- tractive influences on the planets of our system, of which he became the centre. We have now to consider by what laws the vast waste of the heat and light of the sun is replenish- ed ; and, as our conceptions thereon, will be found in some degree at variance with the biiberto re- ceived ideas of the nature of the spaces between the sun and planets, and the regions of infimte space, and bear also considerably on the nature of the sun^s influence on those planets, we shall first make some observations on the cai h ATTRACTION OF MAITER. It is said by philosophers, that al^ bodies are at- tracted to the earth's centre : all bodies thrown in- to the air from the earth descend to the earth's sur- face when the propelling force is spent, and the body is arrested by the atmosphere through which 47 it passes. It is said by Paley, pac^c 449 ot his Na- tural Theology, that " One principle of gravitatioii causes a stone to drop towards the earth, atid the moon to whirl round it. One law of attraction carries all the different planets round the sun.*' — This, he says, philosophers demonstrate ; and at p. 388 he adds, " Calculations were made some years ago of the mean density of the Earth, by compar- ing the force of its attraction with the force of the attraction of a rock of granite, the bulk of which could be ascertained, and the upshot of the calcu- lation was, that the Earth, upon an averajre through its whole sphere, was twice the density of granite, or about five times that of water." Now, respecting the principle of Attraction, I have to remark, that in Chemistry we know with certainty, that particles of matter have a mutual and elective attraction called Affinity. When an acid is united with a metal into a neutral salt by this attraction, it may be separated from it by any substance with which the acid or its particles have a greater affinity. Thus, if iron, or its oxyds, be dissolved in sulphuric acid, it forms green vitriol, commonly called copperas ; but by adding an al- kali to the solution, the iron precipitates, and a neutral salt is formed of the sulphuric acid and that alkali. In a lake or pond in the isle of Anglesea, in Eng- land or Wales, the water holds blue vitriol or cop- j^eras in solution, whieh is a salt composed of cop- per and the sulphuric acid. When iron hoops are thrown into the pond or lake, they become covered with copper scalee, 48 r'S! which is s^Taped off, and found to be the purest copper in nature. This decomposition of the blue vitriol takes place because the particles of iron have a greater affinity or elective attraction for the sulphuric acid than the copper has. The Load Stone is well known to attract iron, even in a cold state. Pieces of iron, rubbed with the Load Stone, become also magnetic : two pieces of wood, or cordage and wood, and probably many other substances, by friction to a great degree, take fire ; that is to say, they become raised to that degree of temperature by that friction, that their particles attract the oxygen from the azotic gas, and from the light and heat with which they are combined in our atmosphere. Certain stones also, as flints, being struck against iron or steel, heat the particles of the steel so as to calcine them ; that is, they bring these particles to the temperature at which they also decompose the oxygen gas of the atmosphere, and disengages a latent light and heat- Thus the attraction of Matter is ccrteiw/y proved by Chemistry. But how is the attraction of large and solid bo- dies proved in the usual temperature of the atmos- phere, as in the case of the block of granite men- tioned by Paley ? One rock of granite, placed alongside another, will evince no attraction. It is said, indeed, that some islands, having much iron ore, have attracted a vessel from her course, which, if it be the fact, may perhaps also prove the attrac- tion of matter of a certain description, but I know no other way by which the attraction or density of the rock of, granite could be proved, but by lav of shi an 49 breaking it by some other body, and ascertaining the weight of the stroke, thus, if a hundred weight of granite required a stroke of a certain number of pounds to break it, and a rock of some other spe- cies required only a force of half that number, its attraction or density might be said to be half that of the granite ; thus far, then, attraction would be proved by Chemistry and Geology also. But, that the Creator originally fixed some such law as attraction for the cohesion of the particles of matter, appears highly reasonable, else, how should the Earth and Planets, travelling at such an immense rate in their orbits, be retained in their present forms, notwithstanding the power of such velocity of motion ? A ball of snow, when impelled by the force of the arm, if it be not rendered sufficiently dense by compressure, separates into innumerable parts, and it mui'>t have been the same with the Earth and the Planets but for some law of attraction or cohesion, to resist the attrition of their rapid motion through the heavens. This attraction, then, of the particles of matter, seems to be indispensible to their existence as spheres, but the attraction of these for each other, though generally agreed to by the philosophers, appears more dubious and uncertain. This doubt is supported by their immense dis- tances ; which may, indeed, be founded on a crude idea, and the doubt may perhaps be dissipated od ftirther consideration. The Moon is observed in its app. o ich to occasion high risings or tides of the waters of the earth» B 50 I ,, which recede en its retiring. This, it seems to mc, is an ahiiost incontrovertible proof tliat tlie atmos^ j^here (for storms are often generated at the same approach of the Moon) and waters of the earth and iscas arc attracted by the Moon. If tlie Moon have this power^we may reasonably conclude that other planets have this power also, governed by certain laws of distance and dimension. Now, as to the manner in which the Sun exerts its attractive influence on the Earth and the other J'lanets. This attraction of the Sun is said, by the philoso- ])hers, to be the cause why the Earth and rlanets, having been, originally, projected in a right line, do not move in that right line, but in their respective orbits round the Sun. As to the opinions of these philosophers of the nature of the Sun's substance, I am not aware, ex- cept as above stated by Paley, that BulTon sup- poses it to consist of molten glass. I trust to have shewn in the foregoing pages the improbability of this, and that it is more probable to be a body of light and heat. His density, in that case, cannot be e(^ual, bulk for bulk, to the density of the Planets, which are with reason considered to be inhabited, and must probably be formed of solid matter. — But as to the nature of the Sun's substance, I con- fess, I cannot conceive it possible that a body of such inconceivable heat, should consist of any thing else than gazeous substance. We know of nothing here below that can produce light and lieat with more intensity, than the decomposition of oxygen gas. Why should we not reason- by ftl analogy that the light and heat of the Snn arc pro- duced l)y the same means? A!I the other means wc have of producing heat hy burning glasses, or by friction, ave derived from the Sun, and nothing is more remarkable in nature, in her general prin- ciples than uniformity of means. The principle of gravity is said to be the same in an apple falling to the ground, as in the motions of the heavenly bodies. Is it not then impossible to conceive, that in the Sun's heat, solid or liquid substances, could exist undecomposed. The diamond is volatilized into vapours, and if I recollect aright, the perfect me- tals also, by the galvanic power.' It has, indeed, been supposed by some, that the Sun may be habi- table, that the heat of the particles of light is owing to their friction or attrition, in their passage to the Planets. By such a supposition, we should be forced to conclude, that the planets farthest off from the Sun were the most warm,, which I ima- gine is totally contrary to probability, to the opi- nions of the greatest philosophers, and to the evi- dence of our own senses in ihe Planet we inhabit. Now, but for the idea which has, hitherto, been adopted, that the regions of infinite space, or at least the spaces in which our Sun and Planets move, are in a state o^ vacuum ; but for this idea, I should say, that the Sun is a mass of burning SBriform substance, such as hydrogen gas, or some mixture thereof, which has the power of decom- posing oxygen gas, and of throwing off its light and heat. The union of the bases of these gasses, oxygen and hydrogen, would form water, in the 52 11 I i*"ii' slate of vapour, which would cither be dhectly decomposed again, by the Sun^s fire, or otherwise be driven offinto the neavens, and probably be in future decomposed, as happens in our atmosphere, by th^ electric fluid, or be otherwise condensed into aqueous globes, for the future formation of other heavenly bodies. (See Note 12.) i shall now ofler some observations on the above idea of the philosophers, on the existence of ii vacuum in the spaces through which the pla- nets move. if we consider the projectile force to have been ab origine given to the Planets by the Creator, wc may suppose, that this force w^as greater than what would have been required to produce their motions round the Sun, if a vacuum had existed, as thus ; allowing the spaces between the Planets and the Su:** to be ^lled with an aeriform substance, of vast tenuit;', (and indeed that such immense spaces should consist of vacuum is nearly incredible) yet it would siiil be possible, that this aeriform sub- stance should not impede the motions of the planets ; because, on the above supposition the projectile force would have been made so much greater than would have been required for moving these planets through a vacuum onli/, as the resist?ince of this joriform substance should render necessary to over- come that resistance by the projectile force. Again, the force of the attraction of the Sun, allowing its substance to be aeriform, and that such immense streams of gasses were continually pour- ing into it, as would be required to support its com- bustion, we shall find the force of this attraction (hit! in a mus aeril cent repi be directly r otherwise bably be in itmosphere, condensed •rmation of ns on the 5 existence :;h the pla- have been /reator, wc than what dr motions If as thus ; :s and the ice, of vast se spaces dible) yet iform sub- planets ; projectile ^ater than se planets le of this y to over- ce. the Sun, that such lly pour- t its com- ttraction 53 (hitherto so called) must be greatly increased ; for, in addition to its own proper attraction, as a body of heat, light and triform vapour, we shall per- haps find reason to conclude that this attraction must be greatly augmented by the vast streams of aeriform substance, continually passing towards the centre of the Sun, for supplying its combustion and repairing the vast waste of its light and heat. ' A small fire in a stove is sufficient to draw to it a strong current of air to support its combustion. The power of currents of air on the earth and seas is well known to upset ships, trees, and houses. The power of steam, also, w ill come under the same comparison; and according to its quantity, will raise almost any weight. What, then, must be the effect and power of such inconceivable streams of gazeous substance, rush- ing through ^he heavens, as must be required to supply fuel for the Sun ? And it appears to me, the power of the Sun to attract the Planets, at such immense distances, is hereby the more satis- factorily accounted for, as they are to be supposed solid spheres, while, as I have presumed, by my Theory of the Sun, his substance must be ceriform, and of course, of much less density, bulk for bulk, than the Planets. If, then, we should adopt the idea that the heavenly bodies do not float in a va- cuum, but should accede to the probability, that the intervening spaces are filled up with an {eriform fluid for the purpose of supplying fuel to the Sun's fire, I humblv conceive we shall have found a satis- factory way of accounting for the influence of the Moon on our seas and atmosphere. If the fact be ii f.l 54 certain, that the waters rise as the Moon approacii- cs the earth, and recede as she retire?? from it, may not this phenomenon arise from the pressure exert- ed on the asriform matter above nlentiored by the Moon, on its approach to the Earth, which pres- sure, at length reaching our atmosphere, presses on it also, and thereby on the Waters of the Ocean, causing them to rise and fall proportionably, and to occasion the Neap and daily Tides ? Should we not, also, have, by the same theory, a plain and simple way of accounting for the great principle of attraction in the heavenly bodies? that, by a power similar to that which propels bodies forward on the earth and seas, or atmosphere, name- ly, the wind; so the heavenly bodies are propelled from their right line, and driven round their central Sun by this mighty current of asriform gasses in their courses towards the Sun ? Allowing the projectile force — (by which I un- derstand Sir Isaac ]\ewton to have meant the pri- mary projectile force directly given to the heaven- ly bodies by their Creator) — allowing that force, and the attractive force of the Sun, to be the causes of the, nearly, circular motions of the Planets, still It appears to me clear, that this projectile ibrce must be something very different from the species of impelling force which Paley, in his Natural The- ology, speaks of in p. 390 of that work. " If it were possible," he says, " to fire off a cannon bail with the velocitv of five miles a second, and the re- sistance of the air could be taken away, tlie cannon ball would for ever wheel round the Earth, insterd of falling down on it." Now, if t?ie ball were fired I oil CO hv 1 nc re i w it ' CJ 55 >n approach- from it, may Jssure excrt- ored by the W'hich prcs- . presses on the Ocean, abJy, and to ime theory, 3r the great odies? that, pels bodies lere, nanic- e propelled heir centraJ ^ gasses hi vliich I uij, nt the pii- he heaven- that force, the causes 'anets, still 2 tile force he species ural The- ^. " ir it nnon ball id the re- ^ cannon ^, inster.d ^crc fired P :l Oil in a directioii due north, it is evident, that in the course of the circle it would form, it must return by the south pole, to the place it was fired from, to north ; and therefore, in every revolution, it would return in an exactly opposite direction to where it was fired off from ; the force, therefore, by which it returns, could not be the force of firing off, be- cause it returns in a line directly opposite to that force. (See Note 8.) I therefore conceive the projectile force, impres- sed by the first cause on the heavenly bodies, is of an entirely different nature from the projectile force of a cannon ball. May it not rather be something in the nature of the force of the current of gasses I have mentioned, as forcing the Planets into their rotatory motion round the Sun ? May not the projectile force, partake of tlie na- ture of electricity ( Referring to what we have said above as to the means by which the waste of the Sun's light and heat is replenished, we shall now make some ob- servations on a very important sontencc as to this subject, contained in Paley's Evidences of Natural Jleligion, page 392. On the subject of the cause of the attraction of the Planets by the Sun, he there says : " Nor shall we find less difficultv in conceiving a conflux ol' particles incessantly Sowing to a centre, and carry- ing dov/n all bodies along with it; that centre being itself in rapid motion through absolute space ; for, by what source is the stream fed, or what becomes of the accumulation ?** 56 The principal objection of Paley, then, to the idea of a tiuid or aeriform substance existing in the spaces between the Sun and the Planets, and between each of themselves, is contained in his question, " By what source is the stream fed, or what becomes of the accumulation V* If we allow, however, that the 3un is a body in a state of constant combustion, and that its ignition is supported in the same manner as terrestrial fires, (and without allowing this, we cannot, accon^'ng to our knowledge of combustion, conceive how the fire of the sun is continued,) we shall meet with no difiicultv in finding " by what source the stream is fed."" The spaces between the Sun and Planets, and also the regions of infinite space, if they be allowed to contain aeriform fluids, (whether these be oxygen and hydrogen gasses, or a mixture of these, or of other inflammable gasses,) these inconceivable ex- tents of space would certainly contain sufficient fuel to supply, not only our Sun, but probably all the Suns of the other systems that may exist. It is, I think, proved above, that resisting medii may be contained in the planetary spaces, without retarding the planetary motions. Hydrogen gas. being thirteen times lighter than atmospheric air, and being very combustible, that is, easily uniting with oxygen, and thus setting free its latent heat and light, may therefore be supposed to form a great portion of these seriform medii, (See Nute 12.) In fact, as we know of no such thing as a vacuum in any part of Nature around us, it seems difficult to conceive that the vast spaces between the heav- cnl; iSUgl ren\ I 57 to the idea the spaces ween each tion, « By scomes of body in a 's ignition -rial Bres, iov(''ngto how the t with no stream «3ts, and allowed ^ oxygen se, or of ible ex-^ ufficient ibly all St. r medii without -n gas. 'ic air, uniting t hea'^t ^rm a ^^ 12.) (-uum fficuit bea r- nnlv bodies are in that stale, and this has no doubt ^suggested to the ancients the idea of the " abhor- rence of Nature of a vacuum*** By what means, then, a sufficient quantity p{ this asriform fluid can be found is, I trust, evident^ and the question of the Archdeacon. "By what source is the stream fed," is answered. And the end to which the stream is applied, namely, th« Fupport of the Sun's waste by combustion, will also answer the other question, " What becomes of the accumulation? I answer, it is consumed byilut Sun's fire. If the medii then of the planetary and infinite spaces may be supposed to consist of hydrogen, oxygen, or other inflammable gasses, or a mixture of these, the hydrogen and the oxygen gasses, being drawn into the Sun, would be immediately decom- posed, giving out iheir latent light and heat, and water would be formed in the state of vapour, which would either be also decomposed by the Sun's fire, or driven off into the heavens by its own elasticity, and there condensed into globes of wa- ter, destined thereafter, to form new Planets or Worlds, like those of our own system, and evincing the unceasing tendency of nature, in obedience to laws by which it is endowed by the Creator, to give life and enjoyment to countless myriads of beings ; in which novel subject I shall treat in the sequel. {See Note 17.) If the fact be founded, that the attraction of a Planet is formed by the attraction of its parts» and that therefore the power of its attraction is in proportion to the density of the Planet ; then, if 58 we allow tho Sun to be a body of triform matter in combustion, its attraction must be mucli less, in porportion to its bulk, than the attraction of each of the solid Planets ; and although its greater bulk may compensate for its inferior density ; but, the current of aeriform fluids which, to use Paley's words, " would be powerful enough to carry bodies down with great force towards a centre," will it not also account, in whole or in a part, for the at- traction the Sun exerts on the Planets ? As to these fluids being, as he says in another place, " power- less with respect to the motions which result fi om the projectile impulse ;" I trust I have explained before, that the resisting force of these oeriform fluids may have been counteracted by an additional power having been given to the projectile force to overcome that resistance ; whereby it has happen- ed, that, as he says again in page 393, " that re- sistance has had no sensible effect on the Moon's motion for two thousand five hundred years," and, I may add further, that these fluids never can have any such effect ; and I trust to explain this more fully hereafter. We now, recur to Paley's observation in page 388 of his Theology of Nature, that " by a com- parative calculation with the force of attraction of a rock of granite, the Earth was said to have twice the densiiv of that rock, or about five times that of water." Has the mode of ascertaining the force of this attraction of the Earth been grounded on the sup- posed force of the attraction of tho Sun on the Earth ond Planets ? Has the Earth's attraction in til latin) ussii 59 in the above experiment been come at by calca- lating its proportionate bulk to that of the Sun. and assigning it therelrom its proportionate attraction? If so, and it should be conceded that the theory I have ventured to propose of the Sun's power of attraction, being created or increased by the streams of airiform fluid passing towards his cen- tre, to supply him with fuel ; if this theory be cor- rectly founded in nature, it is evident the above experiment in the attraction of the Earth, cannot be correct in its results. The force of attraction of a body is composed of the united attraction of its parts ; but, if the Sun's density have hitherto been considered by philosophers to be according to his powers of attraction, and it should be agreed to that the streams of aeriform fluid have a great in- iiuence in producing that attraction, the density of the Sun must, in this case, be much less than it has hitherto been estimated at, and of course the den- sity of the Earth also if it have been grounded on this supposed density of the Sun. I now conclude the theory of the Sun's forma- tion by some observations^on the following extract from Paley's work, p. 380. Speaking of the inter- vening spaces between the Planets, he says, " that the intervals between them are made devoid of any inert mater, either fluid or solid, because such an intervening substance would, by its resistance, destroy those very motions which attraction is em ployed to preserve." I have before endeavoured to shew, that there may be such aeriform substances existing in these spaces, which would indeed resist these motions 60 of the Planets, but that this resistance is sufficient only to diminish the velocity of these motions. To explain this more fully, — ^fay not the Moon hare been originally projected by the Creating Cause to move in its orbit or course at the rate of three thou- sand miles an hour ? and, supposing the resistance of the medii or aeriform fluids of my theory to be equal to one thousand miles per hour, this resist- ance would only diminish the rate of the Moon's motion to two thousand miles per hour, which is about the actual rate she is said to travel in her course. (See Note 5.) In fine, the theory of the Sun*s being replenished with fuel by means of a3riform fluids, is supported by another observation of Paley's. In page 350 of tho above work, he says, " The light and heat of the Sun follow the same laws, and, to us, appear nowise diflferent from the light of a candle and the heat of a coal fire." Why, then, may not this heat and light of the Sun be supplied in the same manner as that of the candle and coal fire ? In our Planet, this heat is now known to be pro- duced by the decomposition of oxygen gas by those combustible bodies, and the consequent extrication of its latent light and heat; but if the light and heat of the Sun be generated by the same laws, and, as there is probably some physical cause for the attraction of the Planets bv the Sun, as it is possible his great magnitude would not require less than the spaces between him and the Planets, and between each of them, to supply the asriform fluid for his combustion ; and as this amazins; current must have a great physical influence on the motion ofthi then ciple] the the tion,| worlj t)l of those planets round their central Sun, and may thercfore throw additional light on the great prin- ciple of his attraction : I, therefore, humbly subnoit the foregoing Theory of the Sun's Forniation and the means of supplying the waste of his combus- tion, to the scrutmy of a candid and enlightened world ; and being sensible of my incompetence, in respect of that profound degree of scientific know- ledge, required in the attempt I have made to re- concile and explain the account of the Creation, handed down to us by our religion, with the sreat discoveries in the science of geology, chemistry, and pneumatics ; I have only to hope, I may, at all events, have exalted the utiHty of these sciences, by shewing their tendency and power to diminish or quiet the doubts of scepticism, and to open greater sources of our admiration of the Goodness, Fowek, Wisdom, and Glory of the Great First Cause. (See concluding Note,) Having thus concluded my attempt on the sys- tem of Creation of our Tiarth and Planets, and of the formation of their Central Sun ; with the means which I conceive may have been adopted by the Creator, to supply the vast waste of his combus- tion, we now proceed to the last part of our pros* pectus, namely, the Dissolution of our Globe, with the possible changes, which the present state of our knowledge would lead us to presume, would be the result of that DISSOLUTION OF OUR EARTH. By the authority of scripture, we are informed that the Globe we inhabit is doomed to dissolution 62 hy the clement of fire. We cannot, indeed, prc- suino to say thai the nature of this conflagration shall be the same, and be governed by the same laws, as those which take place at present, but judging from the hitherto immutable nature of those laws, we shall proceed to consider the principal changes which, according to thcm,would take place at this general conflagration. There are, indeed, many parts in the external and internal phenome- na of the earth, which subject it continually to chrxiigc and decomposition. The probable effects also, of its continual motion in the heavens, and the j>ossible contact of other heavenly bodies, perhaps igneous, appear to confirm the destiny recorded in the scriptures. The late discoveries, however, in pneumatic chemistry, have proved to us, that what had hi- therto been considered as destruction by fire, is only a change or decomposition of the various combustible bodies, into the elements of which they are composed, A great proportion of the vegeta- ble world, is found to be reduced by combustion, into elastic vapour, called gasses ; and, it is not improbable, at least, if we assent to the facts stated by, and the opinion of Professor Chaptal, which I have before stated, on the productions of the vege- tative process ; and also, the still higher authority of Professor Linna3us, quoted above, whereby many of the primary earths and metals are proved to be the products of vegetation. I say, therefore, if we assent to these facts, it is not impossible, that the various eurths and metals, and their combina- •d ni f 63 tions, mav hereafter be found to consist of con^- pounds of the bases of thegasses of oxygen, hydro- gen, azote. In the foregoing systcnn of Creation, I have stat- ed that lead is found to gain an accession of weight by oxydation of nearly ten pounds in one hundred pounds, by the absorption of oxygen from the at- mosphere. This oxygen, must therefore, exist in the oxyd in a solid state. Pit Coal and Pot-ash, are found also to contain oxygen and hydrogen in the same state, and the Schisti or Slate Mountains are also said to have been composed by the decom- position of vegetables, which are primarily com- posed of these gasses, and these Schisti therefore, probably in part consist of solid oxygen, &c. In fine, from these facts, and many others stated in the foregoing pages we have in the theory of Creation come to the conclusion, that the processes of vege- tation and of animalization, were the machinery chosen by the First Cause,for the gradual produc- tion of all the geological bodies of which our earth is composed. Now the marine vegetables ofthe waters or oceans of Genesis, can have imbibed their nourishment from these waters only, and must have had the power conferred on their natures, to decompose these waters, and to recompose by the process of vegetation (as we find to be the case in terrestrial vegetables,) a Vast variety of new productions, all of which, however dense, must have possessed the constituent elements of water, oary^ew and hydrogen, for ih:e\T final elements. The depositions then, of the marine vegetable I l^ I [f I m i I : 6i world, having formed a certain, and very great proportion of the geological bodies of the earth • the remainder of them we have conceived to have been formed by the depositions of the marine ani* mals. The habitations or shells of these, we have shewn in various parts of the foregoing theory to compose a considerable portion of the earth, and the vast venerations of these animals, afler their decay and decomposition have, no doubt, according to their affinities and gravities by their depositions, formed or entered into, the structure of the remain- ing geological products. In the course of our theory, we have endeavour- ed to shew, that the vast Chalk and Lime-stone formations of the earth, may also have been the result of the decomposition or disintegration of these marine shells. On this subject, we have to add one observation, bearing considerably on our present object, namely, the final elements of the geological bodies. It is, that Chalk and Lime-stone, being carbonates of lime, must also, therefore, con- sist of a great proportion of oxygen in a solid state, their carbonic acid being compounded of oxygen and carbo. Lime itself, also has, if I mistake not, afforded Sir H. Davy a metallic button ; it is there- fore an oxyd, and contains oxygen in the same solid state. The marine animals, a^ain, of the waters of Genesis, whether they derived their nutrition di- rectly from those waters, or from the plants con- tained in them, or both, must finally have been composed of the constituent elements of water, the on/y mode of nutrition of those plants. Bnt it is 65 I very great f the earth ; ivcd to h&vo marine ani- 3se, we have ng theory to i earth, and after their U according depositions, the remain- endeavour- Lime-Stone e been the Jgration of fve have to 3ly on our Jnts of the ime-stone, efore, con- soJid state, of oxygen istake not, it is there- the same waters of rition dl- ants con- ave been ^ater, the Bnt it is I possible, and even probable, that the marine ani- mals had the power of decomposing the imbibed air of the atmosphere, by which they would ob- tain another elementary principle, Azote, This is an ffiriform substance, which is always found to be produced by the remains of terrestrial, and, no doubt, marine animals also. Thus we are led to suppose the final elements of all geological bodies, and of the marine plants and animals of the ocean, and of the vegetable and animal productions of the earth to have been ah oriffine, OXYGEN, HYDROGEN, AZOTE, HEAT, and, perhaps, LIGHT AND ELECTR!- CITY ; and that the immense variety of propor- tions of these constitutes the distinctive characters of those bodies. Now, in the event of the dissolution of the Globe by fire, the consequence would be, (as combustion is now known to bo nothing but the extrication of light and heat, or caloric, by the decomposition of the oxygen gas of the atmosphere, and the subse- quent absorption of its oxygen by the combustible body,) that the elements of all combustible bodies would enter into new combinations The waters of the oceans, if not directly decomoosed bv this vast combustion, but, merely evaporated into va- pour, would probably collect together, be finally condensed into water, be attracted together into vast bodies, and form Oceanic Globes^ which must obey the laws of gravitation and motion, and would thus form the matrices of future planets. On the contrary, should the watery vapours of our earth and ocean be drawn into the conflagration RC 66 at thi3 dissolution, and be decomposed by the inten- sity of its heat and the contact of the combustible bodies, which is indeed probable, these vapours would thereby be resolved into their primary ele- ments, oxygen and hydrogen, in the state of gasscs. A great proportion, also, of the vegetable and ani- mal creation would immediately be decomposed into these gasses and the azotic gas. the earthy, mineral, and metallic substances of the globe, many of which we have shewn in the foregoing pages of our theory to contain an abun- dant quantity of these gasses in a solid stale, would be pa rtl v decomposed into these primary elements, and the remaining more indestructible parts, if not decomposed by the heat of the confla- gration, would be resolved by it into vapours, for we have found, as before stated, that even by the comparatively small degrees of heat which the art of )nan has discovered, the diamond, and some of the perfect metals,have been resolved into such vapours: and, allowing even that these metallic, earthy, or mineral vapours, should not be decomposed into their final elements even by the heat of the con- flagration, they must, after the combustion, be col- lected into vast bodies, mix with the other gasses resulting from the decompositions above stated,and, probably, by the agency of chemical affinity, find their decomposition effected by these gasses ; or, otherwise, their decomposition into the primary ele- ments of oxygen, hydrogen, and azote, may be finally effected by the electric Jluid, Thus,aIthough it may be the design of Providence to put a final period to the present state of existence mi decomposed ibstances of lewn in the in an abun- solid stale, ese primary idestructible ' the confla- ^apours, for ven by the hich the art some of the ic/i vapours: earthy, or posed into >f the con- )n, be col- her gasses stated,and, finity, find asses ; or, iniarv ele- may be rovidence existence ^1 of our globe ; yet, as the primary elements of whicii we have conceived it to be composed, are indes- tructible in the present state at least of our know- ledge, these elements must unite to form tlie materials of a new state of existence ; unless, indeed, counteracted by the divine ordinances, by which these very elements themselves should be annihilated. Now, that this globe is destined to dissolution is, I have already mentioned, probable, from many facts in its external and internal phenomena. Its pit Coal, sulphureous and nitrous combinations and the inflammable and other gasses it produces, and the tendency of these to produce earthquakes and volcanoes, may not operate suflSciently deep in the earth to produce its total dissolution. This is indeed more likely to arise, from its various mo- tions in the heavens, and the possible contact of igneous bodies, as Comets &c., and it may form a part of the design of the Creator, that the heavenly bodies should thus be subject to continued changes ; yet, would it not appear consistent with the un- ceasing evidences we have of His benevolence, to suppose, these changes are not to destroy the final elements of His creation ; but to produce higher and better states of existence by their instrumen- tality ? Assuming therefore, that the conflagration we are considering, has finally decomposed and resol- ved by combustion, and the power of mutual afii* nity, or by the electric fluid, all parts of the earth and oceans, into the primary elements Oxygen^ Hydrogen and Azote fnx other elements,we have now G« to consider how these would rccomhine to form other heavenly bodies. These inimary elerients, having been drawn together by the laws of affinity or attrac- tion, would probably be soon ignited, and brought in- to combustion by the electric fluid, or the light and heat of the general conflagration. The hydrogen gas, would then unite with the oxygen of the oxygen gas, whose light and heat or caloric would be set free, and the formation oi watery vapours would ensue. These condensing in the course of time, (for it is probable the light and heat of the conflagration would, by laws of its gravity, find its way to the higher re- gions of infinite space and form the Sun of the newly created system) while these newly formed vapours,condcnsing in the course of time,wouIdform oceanic globes, which, also, in obedience to the same laws of gravity and attraction, would be at- tracted or driven, according to our theory, round their central Sun ; and being endowed by the pow- erful and benevolent ordination of the first cause, with the most abundant prolific and plastic powers for the generation of plants aini animals ; these would, exactly in the same way (by which, as we have stated in our Theory of Creation,) the waters of Genesis produced our Earth, so the plants and animals of these new aqueous planets, would be continually tending, in the course of sufficient ages, by their vast accumulation, their death, decomposi- tion and depositions, according to their affinities and gravities, they would be thus continually tend- ing to form the solid parts of their globes, which, by the laws of gravity, would be attracted more or less near the centre, and thsee depositions would t 69 thus accumulate, until the land should finally ap- pear on the 8ur&ce of these waters. We must then, suppose the same benevolence and power of the Creator would be exerted to bring plants and animals on this part of its creation, endowing them with life and enjoyments of such degrees of eminence in the scale of being, as His providence might be pleased to direct. Thus, we have cause to believe, from our evi- dences of the benevolence of the Deity, that the globe we inhabit, if destined to combustion, may be, thereby, changed into another, and more perfect state of existence, and its inhabitants be gifted wifh greater blessings, and we shall now venture to draw a conclusion from the foregoing observations on the dissolution and reproduction of the globe ; namely, that although we are told in Scripture that this dissolution will take place, and the inhabitants then on earth will perish, yet as we have stated, that ** it would be more consistent with the unceas- ing evidences we have of the benevolence of the Creator, to suppose these changes are not to destroy the final elements of his Creation,** and, as we have accordingly supposed these elements will only as- sume a new state of being, we therefore now draw our conclusion, that, as the final elements of the corporeal substance of man, could only then in common, with those of other elements, assume a new state of combination; so we conceive that the benevolent Creator (having in the present life given to him th^se high powers of intellect, and those hopes of a better state c ■ ^st«nce,) has also arranged some plan, by which ** f truth and ve, that this ire, and her ittempted to iUer offer a stence, and Sea Note 0.) ions on the ion of our ntion, that, nceive the have been stituted by ve are told scan/' and is that WG e data and so I have i; humbly ^n, that the overies ia pneumatics, will warrant the conclusi<:»n 1 have drawn from the foregoing facts and eiperiments. In the theory of the Sun I observed, that the water formed by the combustion of the hydrogen gas, in supplying him with fuel, -might, perhaps, be condensed into globes of water, destined hereafter to form new worlds or planets, like those of our own system, by the means we have detailed in the theor}" of Creation. I have now only to add, that we may well con- ceive this possible, from the incessant proofs of po>ver, wisdom, and benevolence, we are permit- ted to discover in the operations of the Creator ; that, in fact the recent discoveries of our astrono- mers, of Planets never before observed by the vi- gilance of those of former ages may be a proof that new formations of heavenly bodies are always tak- ing place ; and, that as we caiinot presume to limit the attributes and power of a first cause, so the re- productive and plastic powers with which He hath endowed the laws of nature, may be found in con- tinual operation for the production of other sys- tems of heavenly bodies, and that the Almij^hty attributes and energies may be thus continually giving life and enjoyment, in a scalie nearly infinite, and advancing, perhaps, incessantly in displays of His Goodness, roWER, Wisdom, and Glory. {See the luttsr part of Note 17. :•'?> n APPENDIX, The following Notes and Illustrations are recom- mended to the reader's attention as illustrative of the TiiaoRY of Creation, and particularly us containing observations on the late discoveries in Geology, Note 1. It may, perhaps, be thought by Sdmd> that allowing the pr^eesses of vegetation and ani- malization in the waters of (Genesis, to have pto- duced, by their decomposition, all the materials of the Geological productions, yet, that the quantity of deposition required to form the Earth, would be more, tha« they can conceive, could be produced by the vegetables and animatls ^f these seas or waters ; but, one single fact, w%ich I shall mention from an ingenious publication, on tke animals and monsters of our oceans, will, perhaps, satisfy their doubts on this head. It is stated in that publica- tion, " &at the >ofrspiiting of one single herring, be- ing suffered to remain unmolested in the sea, for twenty years -alone, would produce more than suf- iicient to form in bulk, ten such globes as we in- habit ;" and if, according to the system I have of- fered, it be conceded that the design of the waters of Genesis, was to form and piroduce the Earth by 1^ w i 4 / / 74 these depositions, wc may reasonably presume, that vegetable and animal life, were abundantly pro- lific to produce that end. Note 2. I here insert some observations on the fiom^of ition of the granite mass, which is supposed bv «o''"«c geologists, to form the internal p^rta of tli Kn.rih or frame work of the globe. This ni^ js is composed of the assemblage, some- times in thick, sometimes in very thin laminai of various kinds of mineral substance, such as quartz, mica, jasper, &c. all of which substances, again, arc composed of the various primary earths, lime, magnesia, silex, alumine, barytes or terra ponde- rosa. The granite mass, then, is ultimately com- pounded of these primary earths, most of which, we have shewn to be produced by the decomposi- tioa of vegetables and animals ; and that this mass has been, originally formed in, and deposited from a fluid, appears to me proved by the chrystala of quartz, minute scales of mica, and its appearance of so fine a granular structure, and more especially, tlie visible layers and laminae dispersed throughout that texture. I have counted above twenty layers of a white substance, in a pagment of granite a foot square. Now, had the granite mass not been formed by the gradual decay, decomposition, and deposition of marine vegetables and animals, as we have stated in the theory of Creation ; had its materials been formed at once in the waters of Genesis, the vari- ous substances composing it, (the mass) would have united according to their mutual affinities, and been B prc( in vi posi toci sitQ(| the anir csumc, that Jantly pro- ions on the s supposed lal parts of age, wjnic- lamina3 of as quartz, ;es, again, rths, lime, ra ponde^ itely com- of which, Bcomposi- this mass lited from rystala of »pearance specially, roughout ty layers granite a rmed by Dsition of ^e stated als been the vari- jld have nd been 75 prccipated according to tlie laws of their gravity, ia vast homogenous masses ; but, the visible de- positions of part of it, in layers and lamina3, seems to confirm the opinion of their having been depo- sitQd in the course, perhaps, of numerous ages, from the decomposition and depositions of vegetable and animal life. Thus, the granite mass gives, also, evident proofs of formation in fluidity, and although, from its more ancient formation, no instances of is'' (e ve- getable or animal remains maybe founf' in )*.„ inte- rior ; yet, as we know that water of itself deposits nothing, but what it has held in previous s "lution, ei- ther partial or complete, and,3s we kn^w of no other source, from which the substance o^ this solution could be derived in the waters of Genesis, but from vegetable or animal decomposition, and as we have seen, by the foregoing theory and data, that vegetable and animal decomposition affords the materials of which the granite mass is composed. I trust, we are warranted in the conclusion, that having been deposited, and lain many ages previ- ous to the deposition of the secondary and tertiary strata, and that, in a state of moisture, all its ve- , getable and animal organization has been destroyed I trom that cause, and those of compression, internal heats, and the electric fires of the Earth ; and that this granite mass, has been produced by the same means, which appear to have been chosen by the C'reator, for the construction of the more external parts of the globe, namely, the generation, decay, death, decomposition, and deposition of the vege- tables and animals of the waters of Genesis. ra Accordingly we find in the review of the third edition of Lyell's principles of geology, it is stated, that ** the experiments of Watt prove that a rock need not be perfectly melted, in order that a re- arrangement of its component particles should take place, and a more chrystalline structure ensue. We may easily suppose, therefore, [says Mr. Lyell,J that all traces of shells and other organic remains may be destroyed, and that new chemical combinations^ may arise, and according to these views, gneiss and mica schisti, may be nothing more than micaceous and argillaceous stones alter- ed b^ heat, and certainly, in their mode of strati- fication and lamination they correspond most ex- actly. Granular quartz, may have been derived from siliceous sand stone, compact Quartz from the same. Clay slate may be altered shale, and shale appears to be clay, subjected to great pressure^- — Grraiiular marble has probably '>riginated in the form of ordinary lime-stone, having in many in- stances been replete with shells and corals now obli" teratedy while calcareous saads and marts have been changed into impure chrystalline lirae-stones.'* I have, chiefly, made the above extract from Mr. Ly6irswork, in answer to the objection stated in the preface of my theory, made by Mr. Fairholme, regarding the granite mass; and I trust, it will prove, that although, this granite mass contains at present no organic remains ; yet, it may have con- tained them originally, and that they may have been destroyed by the heats, fires and consequent change or fusion, the mass has undergone from those or, perhaps, from electricity.. In Sue, I mu&t: ■ ( of the third t it is stated, that a rock ;r that a re- cles should cture ensue* [says Mr. her organic w chemical nff to these be nothing ttones alter- B of strati- nd most ex- een derived rtz from the , and shale MPessuro;- — ited in the many in- ^s now oblU larts have ae-stones.'* t from Mr. stated in airholme, ust, it will ontains at have con- may have onsequent one from ne, I musrt 77 here repeat, I find no cause, after the perusal of the latest works on geology, to vary from the theory of Creation, I now venture to present. On the contrary, I find several of the German geolo- gists have adopted the same opinion, namely, "that vegetable and animal life have been the cause of the production of the solid portion of the Earth." I therefore, must adhere to the opinion I have stated, in the 11th Note, that the discoveries of the marine organic remains, will be satis- factorily explained by this theorj', and the ne- cessity of supposing the Earth more ancient, that is, since the separation, than by the Mosaic account j)recluded ; and I no>v conclude-this "^ote with an observation from Sharon Turner's Sacred History of the World. " Therefore, [he says,] it appears to me most probable, that whenever the right theory of the fabrication of our Earth, and the era and succession of its organized beings shall be disco- vered, it will be found to be compatible with the Mosaic cosmogony, in its most natural signification. Happy should I be, if the theory I am now pre- senting to the world, should in its estimation be found to approximate tb this description. The late discoveries in geology of Baron Cuvier, Lyell, and Buckland and others, as they comprise not more than one mile of the depth of the Earth, (being no more than an eighth part of its diameter) do not in the least invalidate the theory I have formed,, which comprises the entire of that diame- ter. I, however, repeat and extend here, the ob- servations I have made already in these Notes. First, that Baron Cuvier in his computation of »j I 78 ttie distance of time, namely, 6 or 6,000 years, fat which he places the date of his revolution as tne result,) does not state by what comparison or scale he arrived at his decision ; and it is difficult to con- ceive any scale he could have had, except a known quantity or depth of deposition from rivers or lakes in a given time. If this, however, be the source on which he has founded his computation, I cannot but consider it a very insufficient one. The power of deposition of lakes or rives- could no more be compared to the quantum of that power possessed by the waters of a deluge, or the primeval oceans, than.the currents^f those rivers or lakes could be to the almost inconceivable foree of the waters of a deluge overwhelming a great .part of the earth. I should therefore humbly si^gest the query, that the period at which these fossil deposits of the bones of terrestrial animals may not ascend higher than tlie time of the Deluge of Noah, and the circumstance of no human bones being found in the particular place of these discoveries, has been owing to those parts not being then inhabited by our species. Or, secondly, allowing him to be correct as to the period of 5 or 6000 years, at which he dates his revolution, and which, as he says, " has buried and caused to disappear the countries formerly in- habited by man, and the species of animals now most known, that, contrariwise, it has left the bot- tom of the former sea dry, and has formed on it the countries now inhabited." I would ask, is not this period, which agrees very nearly with the time of the separation of the Mosaic ac- V ^^ DO years, rat ution as tne ison or scale ficult to con- cpt a known i^ers or lakes the source on, I cannot The power no more be Jr possessed eval oceans, les could be 5 waters of a he earth, the query, deposits of not ascend Noah, and being found es, has been ihabited by >rrect as to ch he dates ' has buried brmerly in- limals now eft thebot- rnied on it vould ask, )ry nearly Mosaic ac- ^1 79 count, equally weW accounted for by that sefpara- tion, and, therefore, instead of the countries former* ly i nhabited ** by man hw'ing been then buried and caused to disappear," shall we not rather say, that the Earth was- then separated from the seas^ in which it had, according^to our Tneory of Creation, been formed, and that soon after this period of the separation, Man was created. This Theory will also equally account for the present appearance of those marine deposits and organic remains now found at the greatest depths of the Earth to which rtiankind have yet penetrat- ed. All these marine exuviae and organic remains, and the strata; under which they are deposited, are satisfactorily accounted for by the construction of the 1st verse of Genesis we have formed as the basis of the theory of the foregoing treatise ; and which construction has since been sanctioned by the eminent Geologists and writers already spe- cified. I have only to add some observations on the Review of LyelFs Principles of Geology, of April 1835, on the subject of the antiquity of Mount Etna. " It is thus," it is said, " that volcanic formations confirm the evidence aflforded by the sedimentary strata of the immense antiquity and lengthened du- ralionofeven ^e most recent geological seras." Bet is it not probable that the eruptions of Etna were much more frequent long after the time of its ^ first eruption than what they have been since ? Is it not probable the causes which produced that first eruption have since been greatly diminished by the numerous flowings of lava; according to the force I I i k i i i 80 of the cause, so must have been the number and frequency of those eruptions, and their frequency fi* first cannot be estimated by the eruptions which have happened in our times. The age of this mountain may, therefore, may Ijc very far less than a computation formed on tlie frequency or deposits of its late eruptions would make it. The eruptions, also, may have begun long before it emerged from the waters of Genesis, and diese suL aqueous erup- tions been deposited before the separation of those waters. Note 3. It remains now to offer some obser- vations on the Salt formations of the Earth. These formations offer strong evidence of our theory of thi waters of Genesis. This salt, occa- sionally called common salt, sea salt, or marine salt, is entirely a creature of the ocean : no terres- trial vegetable that I know of has ever produced it, except vv'hen growing nigh the salt water. These vast formations, found in various parts of the Earth, must have unquestionably originated from saline waters ; and one way, in which the se- paration of the salt from the water which held it in solution, may be accounted for is, that parts of these seas have been swallowed up by earthquakes or volcanoes, and their water exsiccated by inter- nal fires ; or, that these parts of the seas have, by some revolution, been separated, and not being re- plenished by any rivers, have Ixien gradually dried up by the Sun. But, I should suppose the quantity of salt pro- duced by these accidental causes, would not, nearly. ai S( th( umber and ' frequency tions which Lge of this less than a deposits of eruptions, Jrged from eous erup- n of those me obser- rth. ICC of our 'alt, occa- *r marine 10 terres- :)duced it, I parts of riginated ^ the se- ll held it parts of hquakes ' y inter- lave, by eing re- ly dri^d ih pro- nearly. SI amount to the vast salt formations of our Earth. Some intentional operation of Providence for their production is most likely to have been the cause of the production of an article so indispensible for the use of man ; and, I therefore conceive, it is more probable these formations have derived their ori- gin from vast depositions of the marine plants of the waters of Genesis. These must have contained this salt in abundance, as do the marine plants of our seas ; and the other products of their decompo- sition have united, according to their affinities^ to form other Geological bodues. Note 4. It 3eems,indeed, almost impossible (sup- posing for a moment the idea of BufToa were found- ed as to the origin, df our Earth,) to conjecture, by what means its waters could have been subsequent- ly obtained. A body of molten glass would, neces- sarily, assume a spherical form in the heavens ; and it seems not probable or possible that such vast cavities as the beds, of the seas or oceans could have* been formed oniit by its motions. Agaiia, vitreous substances do not contain the element? that produce earthquakes and volcanoes* Hydrogen or inflammable gas is probably required for. that effect, which is not contained in glass ; therefore, the vast cavities of the ocean could not arise from internal commotions ; but, even allowing them to have been produced by some unknown cause, how is the origin; of the waters to be come at? Water is, I believe, sometimes generated in our atmosphere by the combustion of hydrogen ; but tbis i^ as a mere drop in the ocean compared to the K *:/ 1^ t ' 82 general cause that produce our rains. In fact, it could not, consistently with the safety of the pro- ductions of the Earth, or even that of their embryos at the time of their fofmation, ha\ e been made a general law for the purpose of producing the wa- ters of the oceans. On the otlier hand, the system of the formation of the earth, from waters generated by combustion, appears to be a more natural and satisfactory solu- tion of the phenomena of creation. The waters formed and endowed, as we must conceive, according to the design of the Crea- tor, with the most prolific powers of generating plants and animals, produced gradually sufficient deposits to form the Earth. I have stated in Note 1, that a single herring, unmolested for twenty years, would, as it has been computed, produce ten of our Globes ; and, allow- ing it to produce only one Globe, what must the depositions of all the vegetables and animals of the waters of Genesis amount to ? In fact, on a consi- deration of the probable powers of deposition of these waters, and of the small proportion the known parts of the land bears to our oceans, we might be inclined to conjecture that there may be vast tracts of land on ihe Globe vet undiscovered. Note 5. It may be observed further respecting this resistance of the a3riform medii of our Thcorv, that, as our system itself, and I believe also the fixed stars, are allowed bv Astronomers to have some progressive motion, and which must be ow- ing to the principle of attraction towards some In fact, it of the pro- Jir embryos sen made a ig the wa- i formation iombustion, ctory solu- s we must the Crea- generating ^ sufficient [e herring, t has been nd, aliow- must the lals of the n a consi- ►osition of le known might be ast tracts sspccting Tlieory, also the to have it he ow- ds some I 83 centre ; therefore, the resisting aeriform medii must move the same way also in their courses towards the Sun, having thus two motions : they must be thus attracted towards the same centre as our sys- tem is said to be ; the resistance they give to the Earth and Planets in their rectilinear motion, tliough it may thereby diminish the velocity of that motion, yet it cannot "destroy it," these airiform medii being themselves under the influence of the same attraction towards an unknown centre. (See Note 8 in confirmation of this.) This idea of a general motion of our system, and of the fixed Stars, will be found "in the work I have so often quoted, Paley's Natural Theology. He states, if I rightly remember, " that the fixed Stars have certainly small motions," and considers them to be attracted to a centre ; and if this be really founded in fact, it certainly oflfers one of the grand- est ideas of the Deity the mind of Man can con- ceive, namely, th.it if all the Systems of the Hea- venly Bodies thus move round one common un- known centre, may we not conceive that centre to Ije the Empyreal Throne of God mentioned in the ^th chapter of Revelations ? from whence He be- holds continually the immense operations of His hands, performing their resolutions round Him ? The above idea of universal attraction also oflTers another very important one, of the cause of the Projectile Force or rectilineal motion of the Planets of our system, namely, that this universal attrac- tion to a common centre IS that cause ? Since writing this Note I have seen the sub stance of its last paragraph confirmed by the elo- tftl 84 qucnt discourses of Dr. Chalmers, la ,ely pubTished, on the Christian Revelation in connection wi :h the Modern Astronomy. Note 6. The reasoning in this work, in page 47, is grounded on the idea, that the entire substance of man, including the soul, is not t«>gy. It appears that as the result of tiiese rcM^ciiChes, he comes to the conclu- sion, " that if any thing be proved by the geology of the Earth, it is, that a great revolution took place on it from 5 to 6,000 years ago,'' anticedent too, to the existence of man on those parts at least, of the Earth, for he is said to have proved, that no vestige or organic remains of the human species has ever been discovered, among the remains of the other animals found among the strata or deposits he treats of. The period at which he states, this revolution to have tciken place, agrees yQ£y nearly with tlie scnl fore Eai suri of Atal the nioi ^m^^': - ''"^ puWished, n mh the in page 47, substance d to perish (. On that il parts of t of Deity, part ; but altogether body, may combina- 3r from the the intelli- er*s atten- earches of lat as the le conclu- e geology tion took nticedent s at least, ved, that n species ins of the • deposits )lution to with the 85 scriptural account of Creation. We know, there- fore, that man then existed, in some parts of the Earth, though he had not spread over much of its surface. We have, in concurrence of the opinion of this great revolution, Plato's account of his Atalanta, supposed to be the extent now covered by the Atlantic ocean,which, according to Plato's opi- nion, was formerly dry land. That it is possible such revolutions may have taken place since the Creation, is not to be doubted. The oceans may, in the course of time, have worn away those boundaries that had prevented their overflowing extensive tracts of the Earth, or the power of earthquakes, or volcanic fire may have produced a disruption and carried away the barriers of the ocean. It is, however, to be observed, tliat it is singular this opinion of Cuvier's is not support* ed by any account in the scriptures. Had such a great convulsion taken place soon after the Crea- tion, is it not probable some oral tradition would have reached the time of Moses, or other scriptu- ral writers, just as we have handed down to us the account of the deluge of Noah ? It were to be wished, therefore, this eminent Geologist had turned his attention to the waters of Genesis ; as, I cannot but think, he would have therein found a more plain and easy solution of the phenomena he has so ably developed. The one mile of strata containing the remains on which he treats would, probably, have been deposited by these waters in a very limited period, previous to the "separation of those waters of Genesis, which would satisfactorily account for the non-appearance ■yeM' \i i 86 of any organic remains of the kuman species in these strata, because, it had not at that period been yet created, and it would equally well account for those fossil and oreanic remains of the marine ani- mals he had found in those strata, and the vast period of time, namely, millions of years, he and the other late geologists conceive these strata have required for formation, would be also accounted for. In fine, there is good and powerful reason to be- lieve the account of Creation must have been de- livered to Moses by divine inspiration. It is not likely, that he of his own ideas, or even from any traditionary account could, in those times, have pos- sessed that extension of thought, that would have enabled him to frame such a system, or to form the conception that the Earth was produced in a globe of water. That it has been so formed, has not been disco- vered by science until the present day, nigh C,000 vears after its separation from those waters ; and •'X ' as I have said in the body of this work, we have rio historical account of any but the waters of Ge- nesis, to which we can refer the phenomena of the Earth, so I trust to have proved, that the best dis- coveries in geology and pneumatics are calculated to shew the real and necessary existence of those waters, and to add new forces to the authenticity and authority of the holy scriptures. It !9, moreover, to be observed, that Cuvier gives us no scale, by which he has decided on the time of this revolution to have been 5 or 6,000 years ; iind it is very difficult to conceive what data he ceuld have. The time taken by rivers or Jakes to 8^ species in period been account for marine ani- id the vast irs, he and strata have counted for. ason to be- 'e been de- It is not 1 from any {, have pos- rould have to form the in a globe een disco- nigh 6,000 ters ; and c, we have :er3 of Ge- 3na of the e best dis- calculated of those thenticity vier gives i the time years; data he lakes to I form deposits of a known thickness would avail' him nothing, as their power of deposition could not be compared to that of a deluge. May it not, therefore, be possible that the revolution he refers to, may have been that of the deluge of Noah in parts of the Earth not inhabited by the human species. Note 8. It is said, indeed, by philosophers, that a body once put in motion, if all resistance to it were taken away, that the body would continue to move in its course forever ; that is a case, how- ever, which never can be proved by actual experi- ment, and it must rest solely on the opinion or ar- guments of those philosophers. If, however, the above supposition of perpetual motion of bodies moving in a vacuum be founded in nature, and that the heavenly bodies are made to move in a vacuum, to obtain the object of perpe- tual motion; we may, in addition to what we have observed in Note 5, on the subject of univer- sal attraction to an unknown centre, remark, that this universal attraction, (supposing our theory of the regions of space being filled with aeriform me- dii to be correct) may be the cause which prevents the diminution of the projectile force in tb'j courses of those heavenly bodies through those aeriform medii. Note 9. It is true, that only some of the earths and none of the metals have yet been decomposed, and are therefore considered as simple substances. Carbo, however, which would appear to be the '■ ' (1 m • vii If' 1 ^ n til r I M 88 chiefly solidifying principle of the veeetative process, is well known to be susceptible of receiv- ing the gazeons state by combination with oxygen into carbonic acid gas. If any method should ever be discovered of separating the oxygen from this carbonic acid gas, the carbo would be found again in its solid state. Chlorine gas also, when united with hydrogen by congelation, is found by a late discovery to assume the solid state, in the shape of chrystals more than one inch long. This modern experiment is of great importance, as it proves that two gazeous bodies can, by their combination, form a solid one. As I have often repeated, also, in the body of this work, and in these Notes,all the metallic oxyds and several of the earths and alkalies must contain a g, eat quantity of oxygen in a solid state. The most dense nature of bodies, therefore, is no proof that they may not be composed of aeriform substance, and a vast and most important field of discovery is, probably, yet reserved for pneumatic chemistry, namely, the separation of the gasses from the caloric, and the light which retains them in that form, and the obtaining their bases in the solid state. As a proof of the vast importance of such a discovery, we now suggest, that the nu- tritive parts of the vegetable and animal kingdom must be composed (if our theory in the foregoing work be well founded,) of the solid bases of those gasses ; the discovery, therefore, of obtaining these bases separate from their heat and light, may pos- sibly offer a mode of forming nutritive matter not yet known to mankind. ver! acti chr^ • stral turj stral of o) thei] that vegetative e ofreceiv- '^ith oxygen jhould ever n from this bund again ^hen united i by a late »e shape of lis modern 3 it proves >mbination, le body of allic oxyds 1st contain te. 3refore, is )f aeriform nt field of )neumatic tie gasses ains them ses in the rtance of It the nu- kingdom foregoing of those ing these nay pos- atter not 89 Note 10. Thus, by our construction of the 1st verse of Genesis, it would appear that the present actual state of the geological bodies, their frequent chrystallization and their gradual depositions in strata and laminae, can be reconciled to the scrip- tural account. That chrystalization and these strata and laminae must, according to the evidence of our senses, have required numerous ages for their formation and deposition. By the supposition that the time of the Istverse^was antecedent to the six days of the separation, the time required for these depositions is obtained, and they are satisfac- torily accounted for ; and also their having the ap- pearance of gradual deposition 'which they present to us. As it would appear, therefore, by our theory, that the Creator has formed the Earth by these natural laws we find every where established, we shall now with humility suggest, that the true meaning of the 4th commandment is, that in six days the hord prepat^ed the Earth. Note 11. Having just now obtained a sight of the late publication of Lord Brougham of last year, 1835, 1 here subjoin an extract from it, describing the late discoveries of Fossil remains by Cuvier, Buckland,and other Geologists, to which I add some observations bearing on the relation of these facts to our theory of creation. In page 33 of his work, Lord Brougham observes, " the discoveries already made in this branch of science, (Geology) are truly wonderful, and they proceed on the strictest rules of induction. It is shewn, that animals formerlv existed on the globe, being unknown varieties of 90 species still known ; but it also appears that species existed, and even genera wholly unknown, for the last five thousand years. These peopled the Earth as it was, not only before the general Deluge, but before some convulsion, long prior to that event, had overwhelmed the countries then dry, and raised others from the bottom of the sea. In these curious enquiries, we are conversant, not merely with the world before the Flood, bat with a world which, before the Flood, was covered with water ; and which in far earlier ages, had been the habitation of birds and beasts and reptiles. We are carried as it were, several worlds back, and we reach a period, when all was water and slime, and mud^ and the waste without cither man or plants, gave resting place to enormous beasts like Lions and Elephants, and River Horses, while the water was tenanted by Lizards, the size of a whale, sixty or seventy feet long, and by others, with huge eyes, having shields of solid bone to protect them, and glaring from a neck ten loet in length ; and the air was darkened by flying reptiles,covered with scales, opening like the jaws of the crocodile, and expand- ing winffs, armed at the tips with the claws of the Leopard. No less strange, and yet no less proceed- ing from induction, are the discoveries m.ade res- pecting the former state of the earth y the manner in which these animals, whether of known or un- known tribes, occupied it ; and the period when, or at least the way in which they ceased to exist. — Professor Buckland has demonstrated the indentity with the Hyenas, of the animal's habits that cracked the bones which fill some of the caves, in order to* 91 3 that species own, for the ed the Earth Deluge, but • that event, y,and raised hese curious dly with the ^orld which, water; and e habitation are carried we reach a e, and mud^ f)lantSf gave Lions and water was ale, sixty or huge eyes, : them, and and the air with scales, nd expand- aws of the ss proceed- made res- :he manner )wn or un- d when, or to^ exist. — e indentity at cracked n order t have also Jrefore pro- I of waters .he time of responding scribed by the more land must, amid state, le circum- sin species I remains, posing, as ace at the Genesis,'* ants have mative of c remains deposited this con- tion, and e on the for their i by Dr. r (as may il, 1836,) or fossil marine. The remains of terrestrial quadrupeds or other ter- restrial species have of course been formed since the separation. I cannot, therefore, but be of opi- nion, that the geological facts described by the modern Geologists, at least as respects marine re- mains, will be more satisfactorily explained by the theory we have endeavoured to establish in the foregoing treatise. That the necessity of suppos. ing that the Earth, since the separation, is more ancient than is stated by the Mosaic account, will be thus avoided, and that this Mosaic account can be thus maintained in its integrity ; and I am glad to observe that Dr. Buckland has acceded to the construction of the 1st verse of Genesis, adopted by Df . Pusey and others, as will be seen by the ex- tract on the preface to this work. To conclude, whether this great convulsion of nature were really one that took place since the creation, and produced the overflow of an extent of country formerly inhabited by the animals above described^ and which has since then become dry land again ; whether, I say, such a convulsion has taken place since the creation or not, it does not at all effect the validity of the Theory of Creation which is now oflfered to the world ; for this theory refers alone to the primeval form ztion of the entire circrtmference and diameter of the earcotland, great'quantities are burnt to extract its saline matter ; as also in Spain and Portugal. What must be the quantity, therefore, that annu- ally decay and is deposited at the bottom of the ocean. In addition to this are the immense formations of coral beds ; the still more immense depositions of shells, and the remains of the different animals of the seas. These depositions are probably conglo- merated by the sand and earthy particles brought down by the rivers and abraded from coasts by the tides and stormS. These masses must be continu- ally augmenting, and in due course of time will pro- bably greatly augment the proportion of land. The waters of our oceans ^wd seas (for a vast quantity is constantly consumed in the nourishment of the marine plants) must, on the other hand, be continually dimi- nishing ; and although, if I recollect aright. Dr. Paley states m his Evidences of Natural religion, that all the evaporations return by the rains ; I think it is easy to prove that not to be the case, for an im- mense proportion of the rains is consumed in the nourishment of terrestrial vegetables & by animal life: a large proportion of vapour is also desolved by the air, and probably decomposed by the electric fluid into its gasses. This continual increase of land and dii in 97 and which IT present the harbor cart loads shore in a the same irica. to extract Portugal, liat annu- om of the jrmations spositions inimals of y conglo- j brought ts by the continu- will pro- nd. The aantity is e marine Ily dimi- )r.Paley that all link it is an im- in the mal life: t by the ric fluid nd and diminution of the waters of the Earth, must it not, in the course of sufficient ages, greatly alter its specific gravity ? What effect this may have on the Earth's relative attraction with the other hea- venly bodies, I leave to astronomer's to determine. But it is, I conceive, possible, that a change in the degree of its attraction maybetho moans by which the dissolution foretold in the scriptures may be ultimately brought to pass ; and it may be also pos- sible, that the design of a Benevolent Creator, in making the proportion of water so much greater than the land, has been, to retard this dissolution for numerous ages. If, therefore, our present seas do continually tend to the formation of land by the decay and deposi- tion of their productions ; if the natural effects of the laws of nature have led me to form a just con- ception that the Creator may have chosen the means stated in the foregoing theory by which to form our Earth, we are certain those means were made competent to that end, and that it is there- fore probable, vegetable and animal life were dif- fused in far greater abundance in these primeval waters than in our present oceans. . The processes of vegetation and of animaliz^- tion, therefore, we have assumed from the facts and geological appearances stated in the foregoing work to have been the means or machinery em- ployed by the Creator in the "beginninff" to produce the land of our Earth, and by analogy the land in the other planets of our system. They have pro- bably been thus produced and continued for a long period, in a soft and humid state, and numerous i; 98 changes and decompositions iiavc since taken placis in thcni by the cflects of the inteixal heats and fires they have generated. To these causes, perhaps, may be imputed the earthquakes, volcanoes, and disruptions which have produced such inequaUties in the surface, and to these internal lires 1 con- ceive may also be ascribed, these rocks havinir no appearance of stratification, they have probaljjy lost the stratified state bv the effects of those fires, or by the power of the electric fluid. Note 12. It may, perhaps, be objected to this idea of hydrogen, or other inflammable gasses, ex- isting in the regions between the planets, to servo as fuel for the Sun's waste of liglit and heat, that such inflammable gasses, would, by taking firo from the electric fluid, endanger the safety of these pknots. It i3, however, I believe allowed, that electricity pervades through all nature, and a vast quantity of hydrogen gas must be constantly exhaling in the decomposition of vegetables and animals ; yet, no such effect is produced. In fact, lightning is never produced that I am aware of, in our atmos- phere, but from clouds. Moisture seems therefore, indispensible for that end, and the hydrogen gas being Uiirtoen times lighter than common air, Uiust ascend far above the atmosphere. Note 13. By the experiments of celebrated che- mists, and more particularly by the authority of Linnaeus, we trust to have proved a considerable number of the primary earths and metalj to be foij in Cr( uh 91> taken places ts and fires s, perhaps, anoes, and inequalities ires I con- havinir no 5 probably those fires, ited to this passes, ex- s, to seno heat, that aking fno :y of these slectricity uantity of ing in the yet, no htning is ir attnos- therefore, 'ogen gas air, must ated chc- lority of sidcrable li to be formed by the vegtlativc process of terrestrial ve- getables, l^ut, conceiving, according to the theory in the foregoing treatise, that it was the design of the Creator to produce the geological bodies by the instru- mentality of the processes of vegetable and animal life, c same remark will apply to the marine animals of those waters. {See the last paragraph of Note 4.) Note 14. The substances Iodii?e, Brome, and above all, Silicon, lately discovered, will probably ere long throw much light on the productive pow- ers of marine substances by combustion. Iodine, at the heat of 213 becomes a violet-coloured gas. It forms an active acid by uniting to hydrogen. Brome is a dense liquid, and forms an orange-co- loured gas by a gende heat, Silicon is procured from Silica, or the earth of flints, by the action of potassium : it appears as a dark faun-colcured powder, which is injlammablef and which produces Silica or the " sandy princi- ple," by combustion. This Silica has been in a part of this Work proved the offFpring of the ve- getative process. It decomposes water and acids. And here, therefore, we have some insight into the means by which Nature has pruduced all the sands^ of the Earth and the rocks composed of siliceou» matter. 100 Sodium, also, a metal lately discovered by Sir H. Davy, is obtained from Soda, the basis of com- moa sea salt. This is, therefore, entirely a marine jjroduction. The Sodium is stated by Sir Hum* phrey to be so very combustible, that when thrown upon water it swims on its surface, hisses violently, and dissolves ; and that Silica, or earth of flints, probably contains two proportions of oxygen and one of Silicon. As a further proof of the production of siliceous earth, by the process of vegetation, we insert the followinff extract from Sir Humphrey Davy's ad- mirable lectures on agricultural chemistry, in p^ge 54, he says on the epidermis of plants, " in the reeds, grasses, canes, and the plants having hollow stalks, it is of great use and is exceeding strong, and in the microscope seems composed of a kind of glassy net work, which is principally siliceous earthy and in the rattan the epidermis contains a sufficient quantity of flint to give light when struck by steel, or two pieces rubbed together produce sparks." It is known, also, that the silicified seeds of the c.hara, a plant which grows at the bottom of lakes, abound in the flints of Aurillac in France. Thus it appears that the latest discoveries of the celebrated chemist Sir Humphrey Davy, confirm the existence of the siliceous earth in vegetables. In fine, having had an opportunity of perusing the best and most modern works on the geology of our Earth, I must here state that they serve to confirm my opinion stated in the tlieory of this work, that the processes of vegetation and animalization in the waters of Genesis, or universal ocean, are the 101 most Fiighly, natural, and reasonable means, hy M-hu'h we can account for tho original fornnation of the geological bodies ; and that these having at that origin been deposited in horizontal strata, nave in part, since been subjected to innumerable convul- sions, elevations, and disruptions by the eftects of internal fires, or the electric power, and conse- quently to great chemical changes in their com- ponent parts is beyond a doubt, and which the pre- sent appearance of almost every part of the crust of the Earth confirms. It is, therefore, probable, that a vast number of the rocks, metallic and mine- ral geological bodies may be combinations of the principles of vegetable and animal life deposited, as stated in our theorv, which combinations have been effected by the internal fires or heats of the internal parts of the Earth, and the joint action of chemical affinities. In fine, the vegetable and ani- mal kingdoms are already discovered by analysis to be reducible to the elementary principles oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, azote, and perhaps heat and electricity ; and I think it probable, the mineral kingdom will, ere long, exhibit the same result. For who would have believed fifty years since, that from silica or the earth of flints, a combustible sub- stance would be procured ? producing silica or th« sandy principle by its combustion, and consequent union Nvith oxygen ? and in fact, all the primary earths are now found to be oxyds containing oxy- gen as a component principle in a solid state. Note 15. It is true that Sir H. Daw states in page 12 of his lectures on agricultural chemistry, !ii 102 that the result of Van Ilelmont's experiment was shewn to be fallacious ; but that the true use of water was unknown till 1785, when Mr. Cavendish made the discovery, thai it was a compound of two elastic gasses, inflammable gas or hydrogen, and vital gas or oxygen. Now, althougaVan Hclmont was ignorant of this discovery, the fact he proved is still maintained, that water is the great source of nourishment of plants. In vain would any of the modern disco- veries be brought forth to invalidate this great fact, since the vegetation of every part of the Earth demonstrates it. In the thickest and largest forests, in the aboriginal woods of the Earth, no sensible diminution of the soil is observable, though under the operation of so vast a vegetation ; whence then can the products of it be obtained but from the surrounding elements water and air ? In fact, Sir Humi)hrey allows in page 211 of fame work, that " when pure water only is absorb- ed by the roots of plants, the fluid, in passing into the leaves, wih probably have greater power to absorb carbonic acid from the atmosphere, when the water is saturat "^d with carbonic acid gas, some of this substance may be given off by the leaves, but a part of it likewise is always decomposed, which has been proved by the experiments of M. Sennebier.'* Now, Carbo appears to be the great solidifying principle of vegetables. The other principles are found to be oxygen, hydrogen, and azote, all of which are obtainable by the vegetative process from water and the atmosphere. Accordingly in^ incnt was ne use of Cavendish mdoftvvo 3geii, and * •ant of this aintaincd, shmont of em disco- Errcat fact, the Earth jst forests, ► sensible igli under once then from tiie ]:e 211 of s absorb- ising into )ower to re, when ^as, some ; leaves, )mposed, is of M. V pies are , all of process ingly ii* 103 page 259 of the same work, Sir Humphrey states, ** It is evident, from the analysis of woody fibre, by M. M. Gray Lussac and Thenard, (which shows that it consists principally of the elements of water and carboTit the carbon being in larger quantities than in the other vegetable compounds) that any process, &c." Again he says, in page 211, " Many ])lants that grow upon rocks or soils, containing no carbonic matter, can only be supposed to acquire their charcoal from the carbonic acid gas of the at- mosphere ; and the leaf may be considered at the same time as an organ of absorption, and an organ in which the sap may undergo difterent chemical changes." I shall here extract from the same work ])art of page 281, relating to the formation of tliQ jirinciples of vegetables by the vegetative process. M.Schra- der and Mr. Braconnot,from a series of distinct in- vestigations, have arrived at the same conclusions. They state, " that different seed sown in fine sand, sulphur,and metallic oxydes, and supplied only with atmospheric air and water, produced healthy plants, which, by analysis, yielded various earthy and sa- line matters,which either were not contained in the seeds, or the material in which they grew, or which were contained in much smaller quantities in the seed ; and hence they conclude they must have been formed from air or water, in consequence of the agencies of the living organs of the plant." These experiments are therefore confirmative of that sta- ted in the work performed by Van Helmont on the willow. In page 282 Sir Humphrey gives an experiment '"'■i"' lOi I m he made with oats to ascertain whether any silice- ons earth would be formed in the process of vege- tation, but ho adds, *' the oats grew very feebly, and began to be yellow before any flowers formed, that the entire plants were burnt and their ashes compared with those from an equal number of grains of oats, less siliceous earth was given by the plants than by the grains, but their ashos yielded much more carbonate of lime. That there was less siliceous earth, I attribute to the circumstance of the husk of the oat being thrown off in germination, and this is the part which most abounds in silica/' Thus it appears by his own experiment, some silica was actually obtained by ihe vegetative pro- cess from the air and the water ; and had the growth of the oats in his experiment come to per- fection, the quantity would probably have been much greater. Moreover, in page 152, he allows tnat plants consume very small portions of earth ; whence then can the trees of woods and forests derive their growth but from water and air ? No(e 16. The ratio of motion of the aqueous globes in their orbits, would no doubt have been in- finitely less than their present ratio in their annual rotation. This ratio of velocity must have been precisely adapted to their density. Thus when first formed of water only, their ratio would have been at the lowest number. As they increased* that density, by the gradual formation of earthy, metallic, and mineral substance, the ratio of motion would increase, until the entire formations of solid matter, existing at the time of the separation being col ral th^ col ri tsmamt^y any sflicc- s of vege- ry feebly, rs formed, eir ashes umber of 'en by the s yielded e was less istance of minatioti, in silica." nt, some tive pro- had the e to per- ve been e allow* f earth ; i forests r? aqueous been in- annual ^Q been f when d have reased* sarthy, motion f solid being 105 completed, these planets would then assume the ratio of rotation they now annually perform round the Sun. The same increasing ratio may be inferred concerning the diurnal motion of the Earth and Planets. Note 17. I have here to observe, the opinion I had formed and stated, in the Theory of the Sun'u Formation, of an aariform fluid or medium existing in the regions of space, has now been confirmed by the discovery of Enckes's Comet. It appears the Newtonians had asserted, *• that either there was no such fluid, or that it was so thin and rarefied, that no phenomenon yet examined by philosophers was capable of betraying its effects.** Vide p.l51, AVhewelPs Bridgewater Treatise,! 833, and same page it is said, " But the facts which have led astronomers to the conviction that such a resist- ing medium really exists are certain circumstances occurring in the motion of a body re yolving round the Sun, which is now usually cali'^d Enckes's Comet." It appears this body was first seen in 1786, and that the effect of the resistance of the ethereal me- dium, from its first discovery, (in that year to the present time, say 1833) has been to diminish the time of revolution by about tv,'o days ; and the Comet is ten days in advance of the place which it would have reached, if there had been no resist- ance. (See page 154 o/* WliewelVs Bridgewater Treatise,) It will be seen in my Theory of the Sun, that it 1C6 was on the idea I had formed of the existence of the asriforni fluids, oxygen and hydrogen, in the regions of space, I had founded the nnode by which I conceived the Sun*s waste was replenished ; and I have certainly reason to congratulate myseh^on the idea of the resisting medium being now confirm- ed by this singular discovery ®f Enckes's Comet. The Nebular hypothesis also appears to me to confirm or support both the theory of the combus- tion of the gasses which I have ventured to pro- pose as the origin of our Earth and Planets, and also the cause and formation of new heavenly bo- dies by the products of the combustion of the gasses for the rep^Ienishment of the Sun's waste of light and heal, as stated in page 57 of thks work. This Nebular hypothesis is thus introduced \yf Mr. Whewell in his Bridgewater Treatise of 1833; page 143 : " La Place conjectures, that in the original con« dition of the solar system, the Sun revolved upon? his axis, surrounded by an atmosphere, which, in- virtue of an excessive heat^ estesded far beyond the orbits of all the Planets, the Planets as yet having no existence. The heat gradually dirr>inished, and as the solar atmosphere contracted by cooling, the rapidity of its rotation increased by the laws oi rotatory motion^ and an exterior zone of vapour was detached it^m the rest, the central attraction being HO- rbnger- able to overcome the increased centri- fugal force. This zone of vapour might in some cases retain its form as we see it in Saturn's ring,, but more usually the ring of vapour would breaK iiito several masses, and then would generally eo- ales Sui don) *P1 S'.**ai«a»«»ip.. :istence of en, in the ' by which ihed ; and myself on V confirm- 's Comet. to me to J combus- d to pro- nets, and venly bo-' hegasses of light? k. iuced bjr oflSS'^, inal con- ed upon? "hich, m yond the : having- led, and ing, the laws of >ur was •n being centri- 1 some s rin^, break Jly eo~ 107 alesce into one mass,which would revolve about the Sun. Such portions of the solar atmosphere aban- doned successively at different periods wx)uld fom^ * Planets in the state o/ vapour/ " Now, it does not appear that La Place has given any clue to find how or of what this solar atmosphere and vapours were formed. He does, indeed,support theidea,that Planets may be formed by vapour and subsequent condensation, wliich is precisely the way the oceanic globes of ou'* theory are conceived to have been produced ; — And without infringing on the humility we wish to preserve, we may say we have presented to his consideration a real and competent cause for the production of the atmos- phere and vapours of his ingenious hypothesis. The combustion of the gasses, of w^hich wo all now know water to be formed, as stated in p. 24 of this work, and the extrication of their heat and light, will they not only account for this solar at- mosphere, but also the means by which the Great First Cause produced tlie Sun hinr:3eif ? CONCLUSION. In the^contempliation of the wonderful discoveries in pneumatic chemistry, of the gasseous bodies ,and ])eculiarly so of the component principles of water, J have conceived the formation of the waters of (^lenesis to have been produced from these element- ary principles, by the creating cause at " the begin- ning;** but have, in the foregoing treatise abstained, / / / ^, 108 for reasons stated at the end of page 70, from carrying my speculations onward tothe other sys- tems of the heavenly hodies, further than reasoning from analogy, that they may have been formed by the same laws. In this Note, however, in conchision of this work, 1 purpose to offer some observations on this 'subject, as a comment on the CUh and 7th verses of 1st of Genesis. " And God said let there be a firmament in the midst of the wateis^^Jid let it divide the waters from the waters ; and God made the firmament and divided the waters which wnre under the firmament from the waters which Wfrc above the firmament, and it was so." These verses lead us to believe, that a Universal Ocean of waters existed over the heavens, and cov- ering every part of them. If, therefore, our theory of the primary formation of our earth and planets in globes of water, be founded in the laws of nature, may we not conceive, that the planets of the other s)'stems of the universe have also been, or will bo, formed in this universal ocean by the same laws ? If the appearance in the geology of the earth have Jed us to believe that at the time of the separation, when the solid parts of it had been duly formed, they were, in obedience to the divine command, (probably by the instrumentality of the law of their superior gravity,) were then separated from this universal ocean, attracting such parts of it as were within the sphere of the attraction of these solid parts, for the formation of their seas and oceans : and that these planets, then receiving from the Creator their projectile force, became immediately subject to their motions round their cen ¥-Mmm;6M:mim*::Sfiiiam_ 109 70, from oilier svs- reasoning formcel by nonclosion scrvations Ch and 7th d let there f,and let it urod made hich wnre hich ivprc Universal ;, and cov- pur theory )lanets in >f nature, the other r will be, le laws ? rth have paration, formed, ommand, law of ed from of it as of these eas and eeeiving became nd their central Sun, may we not, by analogy, also, con- ceive, that the planets of the other systems have been, or will be formed by the same laws ? The Suns of these systems or Stars, as they are com- monly called, must indeed, have existed from the "beginning" of the 1st verse, at the time of the Creation of the waters of the Universal Ocean, by the combustion of the elementary gasses of their composition. Very few of the Planets of these systems have, I believe, been yet discovered. This may be owing to their immense distance ; but may it not also arise from their not being yet duly form- ed, and evolved from the waters of this Universal Ocean ? and does not the almost annual discovery of new heavenly bodies warrant the supposition ? With deep humility, therefore, I venture to call the attention of philosophical divines and others, to the more extensive and profound contemplation of the Universal Ocean recorded in the 6th and 7th verses of the 9th chap, of Genesis. The late dis- coveries in Geology and Pneumatics, Jn application to this subject, appeal strongly to this contempla- tion. The unity of the laws of Providt nee, would almost, compel us to believe, that all the Planetary systems have, or will be formed in the same man- ner; and carrying with us The highest degrees of our knowledge of these laws into the contem- plation of the works of the Creator, wo may, perhaps, find that it will afford to us an iosigi't into His Power, Wisdom, and Glory, far more stupend- ous than mankind have yet conceived. TAB In OF BOI y A Ill TABLE OP OEOLOGICAI* FORMATIONS IN THE ORDER OF THEIR SUPERPOSITION. BY M. AL. DE IILM- BOLDT, Alluvial depoBitea. Limeitone formation, wllh millstone (meulierea). Sandatone and sand of Fontalnebleau. Oypsum with bones. Siliceous Limestone* Coarse Limestone. (Clay of London.) Tertiary sandstone, with lignites (brown coal). Plastic clay. Molasse. Nagelfluhe. I wblte, Chalky <6oft [tuffean] ( chloritlc. ^naruhitea. Orecn Sjotd. Wead clay. Ferruginous sand. Secondary limestone wf^ii lign>tet. Ammonitea Planu/ilea» Limestone of Jura. Quadersandstein, or white sand stone, soDtetimes above the lias. MuBchelkallc. Ammonites nodosus. Slaty beds with deh and Crustacea. Coral rag. Dive clay. Oolites and Caen^ Lime- stone. Marly or calcareous lias, with grypkcBa areuata. Marls with tibrous gypsum Arenacious layers. Salii'erous variegated sandstone. Product, aculeat. {Magnesian Limestone. Zcch^tein. I Coppery slate [Alpine limestone. Q.uartziferous porphyry. Co-ordinate formations of porphyry, red sand stone, and coal. g •a a ft. a •§ o «2 Transition formations. , Slates with Lydian i tone, greywacke, diorites, euphotldes Limestone with orthoceratites, trilobites, and evomphalitca. 5 c ■5.2 Primitive Formations. Clayey slates [Thonschiefer] Mica slates Gneiss Granites .>3 eu.o |i / Pkefa( ofDi Some a Insuffic cienti of th( Format Vege Our Ea Observa fon, ( On the count Observe of the TheOu Instanci body The coi whic Discovt Compoi Hvdi The'C prod) Theaq Accoui Every mati INDEX. PAGE. Preface ; containing an Extract from the Review of Dr.Buckland''i Bridgewater Treatise, 1836, 3 to 7 Some account of the Author • • . 9 Insufficiency of the Chaotic sysicm of the an- cients to account for the Geological appearances of the Earth *. 10 Formation of the Earth's salts Coul formations. 30 Cause of Marine Productions being found above the level of the sea to bo sought in the original formations in the waters of Genesis tii Observations on tho construcjion of the meaning of Ist verse of Genesis of ihivS work ib. The aqueous Globes endou ed probably with ama- zing prolific powers of life '33 Results of the Analysis of vegetables by Chaptal. . 84 Oxygen exists in a solid state in ail the ox\ ds . . 30 The' Earths Metals and Minerals found in vege- tables are products of the vegetable process. . . ib. The variety in the propertions of the primary ele- ments probably the cause of the distinctive cha- racter of Metals and Minerals 87 Siliceous Earth proved by Professor Linnaeus to be the result of the vegetative process, 37 The conclusion arrived at that the Geological bo- dies have been formed in the w aters of Genesis. 30 Cause of the depressions of the Earth forming the beds of the original Oceans 40 Cause of the Creation of Marine Plants not being mentioned in Genesis ib. Theory of the Sun*s formation 42 Remarks on BufTon's Thecy of the Earth and Plants ib. Heat and Light 43 Formation of the other Planets of our system and their mooijs drawn from analogy » . . 40 AttrJ ObsJ vt *mMMwiii 115 PAaE. Attraction of Matter 46 Observations on the hitherto received idea of a vacuum « 51 An idea on the cause of iho projectile force .... 52 Copper in Isle of Anglcsea, Load Stone, d^c .... ib. Attraction of the sun 50 Answer to Archdeacon Paley*s question on the stream of particles flowing towards the sun ... 55 Formation of watery vapours by the Sun 67 How the motions of the Heavenly bodies may not be destroyed by the existence of aeriform fluid in 9paco ,,,, 58 The existence of aeriform fluids in the regions of space may throw great light on the Sun's attrac> tion 01 Dissolution of our Earth as announced by scrip, ture ib. The discoveries of Pneumatic Chemistry as ap- plied thereto 02 Marine Animals of the waters of Genesis • 64 Probably final Elements of the Geological Bodies. 65 Decomposition of the Earthy Mineral and Metal- lic substances by Heat Chemical Affinity or Electricity ib. The Dissolution of the Globe considered from its existing Phenomena * 67 Recombination of the separated Elements to form New Heavenly Bodies 63 The Immortality of the Soul of Man drawn as a conclusion from the Indestructibility of the Laws of Nature 70 The other systems su])posed by Analogy to have been formed by the same Laws as our system ib. An idea of the formation of now Planets by the com. bustion of the Gasses serving as Fuel to the Sun 71 i 116 liNDEX TO THE NOTES. PAGE. Note 1. The Offspring of a single Herring un- disturbed competent to produce ten of our Globes 74 Note 2. On the Granite Mass— Formed like the secondary and Tertiary Srata by the deposition of Vegetable and Animal Matter ib. All traces of Shells and Organic Remains may bo destroyed by Heat in Rocks proved by Watt and Lyall \ 76 Rev. Mr.FairboIme's opinions on the Granite Mass , answ«^red ib. Opinion of the Reverend Sharon Turner on the Mosaic Cosmogony and observations of the Au- thor 77 Observations on Cuvier's last Revolution on the Globe extended ib. On the supposed Antiquity of Mount Etna . . 77 & 79 Note 3. Salt Formations..., 80 Note 4. Further remarks on Buffon's system.. 81 Observations in support of the Theory of Crea- tion of this work 83 Deduction from the probable powers of deposition of the Waters of Genesis that more Land yet remains to be discovered on the Globe ib. Note 5. On the power of resistance of the aeri- form Medii of our Theory ib. Attraction of all the Heavenly Bodies to one com- mon Centre 63 An idea of the cause of the Projectile Force. •,,. ib. Note 6. The Indestructibility of the soul explain- ed 84 Note 7. ObservatiousonCuvier's last Revolution ib. :Ji^3i. «?*r'iiti8v»/-i 83 ib. ib. 117 PAOX. The late Discoveries in Geology ascribing millions of years, as the age of the World, accounted fur by the Theory of this Work 67 Note 8. Cause assigned as a preventative of di- minution of the Projectile Force ib. Note 9. Two Gasseous Bodies rendered solid by Congelation 88 A vast and important Field of Discovery pointed out in Pneumatic Chemistry ib. Note 10. The present state of Geology recon. oiled to the Scriptural account of Creation. . • • 89 Note 11. Extract from the late work of Lord Brougham on the new discoveries in Geology ib. Observations thereon • • 91 Three facts deduced therefrom, maintaining the integrity of the Mosiac account .92 to 96 Some observations in support of the formation of the Geological Bodies in the primeval Oceans drawn from the depositions and formations now taking place in our Seas ••..•••.•• ib. Cause assigned for the constant diminution of wa- ter in our Oceans • ib] Possible design of the Deity in making the pro- portion of water on the Earth so much greater than the Land 97 Many rocks have lost their original stratified state by internal fires and electricity 98 Note 12. Reasons shewn why Hydrogen Gas may exist in the Regions of Space without Ignition c ib. Note 13. The Marine Vegetables of the uni- versal waters were endowed with more abun. dant powers of production than the Vegetables of our Earth 99 Note 14. Iodine, Brome, Silicon and Sodium., ib.. 118 PAGF. Extract from Sir H. Davy's Lectures on the ex- istence of Silica in Vegetables 100 Note 15, Experiments of Schrader and Bracon. not, provmg that the earthy and saline matters of vegetables are formed from air and water* • lOB Experiment of Sir H. Davy proving the forma- tion of silica in vegetables • • * 104 Note 16. Ratio of motion of the Aqueous Globes according to their increasing density ib. Note 17. Enckes's Comet from WhewelPs Bridgewaier Treatise support the Theory of aeriform medii of this work. ••.•••• • • 105 The Nebular Hypothesis from do • • • . 106 Supports the formation of Planets in a state of vapour, on which our Theory of their forma- tion in this work is founded •••••....• 107 The products of the Combustion of the Ga!?ses to form the Planets proposed as a cause of his solar atmosphere, and as the cause of the Sun's formation at the beginning .» • ib. Conclusion ....•• ••• ib. Comment on the 6th and 7th verses of Genesis* • 108 Gt Pt Cc Cc Mem. — The 21st ami 22nd lines in page 30 trans- posed. In page 54, for " Neap and Daily Tides," read " Spring, Neap, and Daily Tides." .»>*.^ PAGE. le ex- 100 acon. alters iter. • 108 Drma- • • • • 104 rlobes • • • • ib. ivell's >ry of • • • • 105 106 te of 4 irma- • • •• 107 isses ►f his Jun's » • • • ib. * • • • ib. ;i8«. 108 JO frans- ss," read 119 A GLOSSARY OF TERMS IN THIS WORK. Geology^ the Science of the various substances form- ing the interior and the crust of the Earth. Pneumatic Chemistry or Pneumatics , the Science of aeriform bodies. CdloriCy matter of heat prevading all bodies. Carbonic Acid, the acid of charcoal formed by burning it in open air. It escapes in an aeriform state^, Oxygen Gas, a constituent element of our atmospherCi supporting combustion and life in the highest degree. It is, al&o, a constituent element of water. (Vide page o/*23 this work,) Hydrogen, a constituent element of all water, it is call- ed also inflammable air or gas, and is the same that is now used for lighting cities and inflating balloons. Azote and Azotic Gas, a constituent principle of our atmosphere, destructive to combustion and to animal life. ( Vide page 23. ) Tertiary Strata, in Geology the strata or formation of the Earth as far as man has penetrated, are divided into three, the Primary being the lowest — Secondary being next — Tertiary being the uppermost. Sulphuric Acid, common Oil of Vitriol. Vacuum,u. space void of matter of any kind, now known not to exist. (Vide page 52 to 61, and Note 17.) JEriform Fluids,ga8aes or fluids resembling common air Planets, the heavenly bodies composing our system and revolving round our Sun. Attraction, that power in matter by which it continually tends to gravitate towards other bodies, according to ihe laws of its density and distance. Silex, siliceous or sandy principle. Alu?nine, pure earth or clay. hamincB, the appearance of many rocks in the Earth resembling the leaves of a book. [Earth. Fossil RemainSf of animals or vegetables found in the Si \^orkJ stalec bodie! cxuvi part seeing world Bui the ^1 himse it is tc verse proba how c given in the lions Ui publii land'i stiuc who, consi bly, wnti H INTRODUCTION. TO THE THIRD EDITION. -' , I ' Since the publication of the se^.tjnd edition of this Work, I have found that the celebrated Hutton, as is stated by Keith, was of opinion, that all the geological bodies of the earth, had been formed by " marine exuviae or remains." It is satisfactory to have this part of the theory of the earth, which, previous to my seeing this opinion, I had formed and presented to the world, sanctioned by so great an authority. But Hutton's Theory of the Earth, being adverse to the Mosaic account of the creation, he drew upon himself much obloquy from the supporters of it; and it is to be lamented that a due consideration of the first verse of Genesis had not occurred to him ; as, most probably, his sagacious mind would have discovered, how (iompletely t e explanation we have in bur theory given of that verse, will give the length of time which, in the opinion of many geologists, the various forma- tions of the globe 'require. Many of the modern geologists, however, who had published their works previous to the Rev. Dr. Buck- land's Bridgewatcr Treatise, in which the above con- stiuclion of the first verse of Genesis is assumed, or who, having not yet sufficiently contemplated that construction, so as to adopt it themselves, and, proba- bly, not willing to come into collision with the sacred writings ; these geologists. I say, have now abandoned 1 II ihc practice (»f forming any theory of ilie earth at all, and limit themselves to the cuilcciion of ^culogical facts. Now. it iippearst to me, that if, on a due consi* deration of tiio facts which bntaiiy, chemistry, pncu- m itics iind g(; >h»>?y present us vviih, it be conceived, that l»y a just c<»mi)ii)atii»n of these lacts, we can by fair iitduction and aiialogy, gain an insight into the most mysleriius operations ot Nature, and the hiws which iis onuiipotent Creator m:iy have estabhshed for these «>p(;rations ; there is then no just cause wiiy such a combination ot these scicniilic facts should not be attempted ; there is no just reason why the human n)ind Ahould bo t'ttteied in the prtttoundly inteiesting science of Cosmotronv more than 'u\ anv oihcr. There is not, perhaps, in the vast ran^^e of Natuie's wiuks, one whi(!li cxcMies in the mind a greater degree of mysterious wonder, than the. inspection re^roncile the Mosaic account of crea- tion with ihe time said by the modern geologists to be required fi>r these formations— having done this, my next wish was to inquire wtiat physical laws the Crea- tor had chf>sen to produce them. By physical laws tliev arc uiidoubtediv formed, as far as we have arcesf • • • to examine them ; and we have the poweiful sanction of every partof nature, to conclude by analuiry that >he entire diameter ot the ijlobe *di verses of the 1st of Genesis, we find the earth was covered by the waters until the time of the separation. We have therefore just right to conclude it was formed in those waters of Genesis, and, accord- ingly, as stated by one of the best modern geologists — " Every pait of the earth, every continent and every island exhibits the ^ henomenonofmarine productions." Our th(M>ry is founded on these scriptural and geo- logical facts; and we have a confirmation of the com- petent powers of the vegetable and animal deposits and labours of the marine animals of the ocean to pro- duce these formations of the earth, in the known and established fact, of an extent of land more than equal to one-eighth 6i the diameter of the earth, being formed ly by a few species oFmarine insects, for ihc CornI Islands and roofs of the Jiidian Soa and Pacific Ocean- arc 1,500 miles long by 60 or 70 broad. In ilic course of my journics through thirf province, lo offer my works for sale, I am happy to slate, thai a great majority. of the people appeared to be duly impressed with a belief in tl\e sacred scriptures ; indeed I have met with spmo who s.eemed to th'ink the Mosaic account of creatiqn required no support. These were, however, generally persons unacquainted with the authenticated geological facts. It is unquestionable that many of the formations have been produced by gradual deposition from the waters ; and must have required a period for that deposition immensely greater than that since ilic creation, being near 6,00b years. Some modern geolt gists claim indeed millions of years for these formations of the crust of the earth ; and, we trust, ^o can thorogghly satisfy these claims by the construction of the isl. verse. of Genesis., now sanctioned by the eminent writers mentioned in the preface to the first edition. We trust also to have presented a palpable clue to the discovery of the mode in which it may have pleased the Deity to have constructed the solid machinery of our globe. The vastness of this machinery is indeed calculated to strike the mind with awful wonder, but it is his work, and, as such) a.fair subject for the study and discussion of his creatures, as tlie xpore it is examined the more profoundly will be exhibited^bis bounty and his wisdpra. We trust to have shewn, in note 5th, that. tliQ theory.. of the existence of animal life, previous tOr the seconilarv formations, is tenable, and, that the inl la hi «• ■-?■ 3X'' , Xiv. TO I Islands Oceap.arc ! province, slate, that o be duly es ; indeed he Mosaic lese were, with the estionablc )duced by nust have nmenselv ear 6,000 [illions of le earth ; se claims (sis,, now d in the J clue to J pleased inerv of s indeed i\\ but it udy and camined nly and )lh, that ious tQ liat the incandescence of the earth, as supposed by Dr. Buck- ]and, docs not n\crthnnvit; and, therefore, that we have a i ight to say with a great modern geologist— '* That the causes at present in operation must have been producing the same ^Hects in all prcteding ages.'* VVc conclude, therefore, that attempts to foim a lystem of the creation, when based upon authenticated scientific facts, arc allowable, and (he more so, that in the piescnt enlightened state of the world, these systems can be duly examined and their merits deter mined. We hive, In this edition, at the close of the theory f>f the sou's foimation, giyeii s No^.^.i. himj>elf suggests **ilU5 existence of an ciherial and gaseous mednini pervading all space ;" and. perhaps, the exist- ence «»f this gaseous mediu'n, would serve to show the physKtal cause of these jirinciples of attraction and gravity, and. tlitMcby account for tlurir efU.'efs. We have als(» inserted extracts IVtitn JSir Jnlin Ilcr- schell's Astronomy j>f last year, also sanctioning our idea of ihe supply of the sun's v*asic by gaseous mat- ter ; and it Js with llie greater satisfaction wo «ivc ibis 1* Ml VI extract from Sic Xohnls.work, thaj.thc late Doelor llersclieil was uf opinion timt.the sxin (night bu habit- able. Sir John '»ii8 now declared hi^ opinion, that *• the aun'b^^odi^ic^l (igjit is part of that medium whjch resists^ the (Action of comets, and is loadet-i with the nvu^iiala of the tails of millions. of them which may be slowly, subsiding, into the;sun." These materials must, of oouise, be gaseous ; iiow the combustion uf gaseous. matter is nothing but the union of the base of the gas. with that of oxygen gas, without which no combustion takes place* and the consequent extrication of the light and heat of this oxygen gas, by which we coRclude,^ as per our theory* the waste oi thesun's light and hcatr is replenished. -• , ; .■/.■> : Accordingly. Sir John, in another part of his work^ slates his opinion that there is "is an enormous heat in the sun." Dr; Herschell, his late, father, says, that liie sun's luminovip: atmosphere; is only '4,500 miles from the sua's surface. - That those admitted facls can be reconciled with his opinion of the sun being opaque and habitable, when under, the ipfluence of such enormous, quantities of light and heat, appcius lo '^^c totally con-, irary to all possibility. Jn addition to these sanctions ,of the existence of aa icr:fo!'M medium in th? regi'^ns oi iufiriite space, we. have the great satidfacuon to refer the reader to our. extract from L)r. Graham's Elements, of Chemistry of last year^ where he will find that, from recent experi- ments '6f one of the most celebrated opticians and' philosophers-of the present day. Sir Uav id, Brewster, he concludes that the *' sun's atmosphere must contain gasejus matter." Several explanatory additions are made in the body d?m^m*^i''mmmM^i)iimaiA f Doetor. )o habit- Kit *• the ii resists lut^riala ' slowly^ nust, of gaseous, the gas. bustion he hght •ncIucJe,^ nd hcaV s work» us iicat is, that IS from, can be uc and M'mous. y con-. J of an^ :e, we. o our. :try of xperi- and ivster, )ntain VII ©f this edition, to which we ask leave to refer the reader, luirlicularly to the Elucidatiou of the theory of the Forniiition of the Earth. We now present the third editioo of this work to the public of United Canada, trusting that the system of Creatii>n we have attempted to form, will receive a considciable degree of sancijon from the scientilic aulhoiuties, discoveries^, andoliservat-ions we have now enlarged it with ; and that it may be found to meet the approbation of scientilic men of the present, and ako serve as an instruciive book for the rising gene- ration. THE AUTHOR. Montreal, 1842. ,;. N. B. — The reader will find tho extra matter of this Fourth Edition in the Apponoix No. 2, which contains a piwerful support of our Theory of the Sun, by extracts from M. Arago's work on Comets, and Doctor Lardner's Lectures. Toronto, April, 1845. body lU lh( APPENDIX No. 2. Page 9, read— ThQ reader will have received some idea of the purpose of the Science of Geology, from ihe prefaces to the former editions of l.'iis work ; and in order to exhibit to the Canadian public the practical utility of this science, we extract from a Into Geological work of some merit, namely Element's of Geo!o<;v for Popular, use, by Chades A.Xee, M.D., of New York, his statement of this utility. In the first paragraph of his preface he says: — "No department of the natural sciences possesses greater interest or leads to more important practical resultn. liinn that of Geology. Of late years, it has attraclci almost universal attention, not only from the farrinaling wonders it discloses, hut also froni ity obyioiis and extensive application to the economical purposes? of lifo. Of such itnportance has it been regarded, that many ^^f our State Lcgislaiures, as well as the General Govet i.nent, have authorized geological surveys to be nude, in order that ilie natural resources of the country may be brour the actual foimations whose duration we know. We are forced »o admit that the world is nllcast 3II0.0(H» \ ears old."— Boa6ceV Geol. Populaire, p. 7, Paris. 1 833. Paije Q3. fine 11, 7*ctfr/— By this explanation we shall ite ;it>lc to .ictouiii for any length of time which the ft»rmaii j formed the nucleus or centre of the earth.- This nucleus * It may be proper to explain how the primitive races df the vegetable tribes may have been supported before the nucleus was formed. There are many aquatic plants which take no root in the earth at all, but grow and float in the water. There is a species of the Fig-tree in the Edinburgh Botanic Garden, which var; the t<..v.P, 15 lis of that the fore- )rk, 1840) bounds in lide of the ian Gulfs. 350 nniles V Guinea, be Maldi- iding 480 are cir- iieter, the to twenty ind at the :oral reef, generally e general f the I « sntre formed I nucleus pes of the nucleus te no root lliere is a ]n, which being continually augmented in bulk by the unceasing depositions of the ocean, until a great depth of vegeta- ble and animal remains were accumujalcd, internal heats and fires would be thereby generated, which would last until the combustible matter deposited was consumed. The fires Wv^juU then cease, until another sufficient depth of fresh depositions took place. The fermentation of these would again produce heat, fire and incandescence, until again the combustible matter last deposited was consumed. The remains after these combustions would, of course, be incombustible, and would consist of all the primary earths, sands, clay, lime, magnesia, &.C., and of the calces or oxyds of the various metallic and mineral substances contained iu the original depositions of matter above slated. These allernato depositions from the ocean, must have continued to generate these periodic fires, pending the whole time reqliired for the formation of the dia- meter of the earth, that is until the separation of the " dry land" irom the ** waters" took place as mentioned Genesis first chap, and 9th verse. The depth or thick- ness of the depositions required to produce each of has grown for twelve years, suspended in the air and moistened with water; we have therefore a right to conclude, that if some species of land plants have this power, many of the first created »narine plants of the ocean of Genesis would have it also. In fact, many marine plants of the present seas grow on the rocks, and must consequently derive their nourishment from the water. But it is possible that until the nucleus was formed, the primitive marine animals may have found their nourishment in the waters, for the microscope shows us that every drop of water contains myriads of the insect tribes. We know also that the gills of fish decompose water, by which they would obtain two of the elements of all vegetables — Oxygen and Hydrogen. ! n ^:''l 16 these periodic fires, it is impossible to form any certain idea of. It may have required many miles of depih of deposits, as they would contain carbonic, sulphureous, oily, gaseous, earthy, saline and metallic matter mixed ; but it is well known that it requires but a small depth of vegetable matter alone, being moist, and heated by fermentation, to produce ignition. A common hay- stack is often fired by the spontaneous ignition of its hydrogen. Thus, according to this theory, we see that the inter- nal fires of our earth at the present day, at least as far as they have been occasioned by the above original causes, cannot extend to near the centre of the earth ; because the periodic fires above stated, would consume nil the inflammable matter, at certain periods after it Was deposited : each periodic fire would consume the combustible matter deposited from the ocean since the previous fire; and after each conflagration, the parts of the earth then formed must have remained in the state of incombustible calces. This theory will perhaps also account for that singu- lar phenomenon in geology, of entire genera of marine animals disappearing at diflerent depths in the earth. The incandescence had destroyed these genera, and it was not until the (then) surface of the earth was cooled sufficiently by the waters ot the ocean of Gene- sis, between the times of the periodic fires, that fresh genera of animals could approach it. They then approached it, and, as they terminated the time of their existence, their remains went, with the other deposi- tions, to augment the growth of the earth's bulk, and so on continually, until the separation of the land from the waters. at e: 01 d( no 17 \y cerlain fdepih of phureous, 3r mixed; lall depth leated by non hay- ion of its the inter- ast as far original le earth ; consume Is lifter it sume tiie since the tlie parts 3d in the fitsingu- ' marine earth, ra, and th was f Gene- at fresh y then of their deposi- andso om the The reader will here observe, that although by the above causes of the primitive flres having ceased to exist, and the residue of them being matter in a calcified or oxydized form, except indeed, the matter of the last depositions of the ocean of Genesis, (which may be one of the causes of tiie present volcanic fires) that there- fore, no central fire arising from these primary ca'^ses can exist ; yet, we do not mean to deny, tliat subse- quent causes of fne may have, and are perhaps even now taking place. The electric fluid, as is proved by late discoveries of Sir H. Davy, on the primary earths, of which the oxy- datcd matter of the above conflagrations would mainly consist, is capable of decomposing these primary earths, and water also. It is possible, therefore, com- bustion might be generated, even in the oxyds to which the original deposits were reduced. Thus, in the opinion of many Geologists, there is a central fire in the earth. Mr. Lee, in his Elements of Geology, page 53, says, " From the result of all the observations hitherto made, we may safely conclude that the temperature of the earth increases as we descend, at the rate of one degree for every eight fathoms, consequently at a depth short of a hundred miles, the materials of the globe are in a state ot incandescence." Now, though I agree that from the cause above assigned, the (electric fluid) internal fires might pos- sibly be regenerated from the oxydated remains of the primordial fires, yet I should conceive these subsequent fires are more likely to be partial than general. 1 con- ceive that the intention of the Deity was, by the means of the primordial fires, to prepare and harden tho geolo- 8* ii|^ lis gical bodies, to produce chemical decompositions and re- com bin aliens, of numerous usefifl substances, to increase the cohesion of these geological bodies, to ena- ble them to sustain their rapid and powerful motions in the heavens, to elevate the mountains, to diversify the earth's surface, and give mankind the use of their mineitii products ; and I do not conceive these ends would be obtained, were the whole interior of the earth in a state of fusion from a hundred miles below the sur- face. The increasing heat of the earth as we proceed downwards, can be equa!ly well accounted for by sup- posing the present fires to be occasioned by the more recent depositions of combu ible matter from ^he oceanic waters of Genesis, which are still in a state of combustion. And there is one corroborative rircumslance of this staled by Archdeacon Paicy, in page 388 of his Theo- logy of Nature, namely, that " by a comparative calcu- lation with the force of attraction of a rock of granite, ihc CLxrth was said to have twice the density of that I'ock or about five times that of water," which could not be the case if the earth were nearly all liquid fire ; for, ileduciing the 100 miles of crust from the diameter of ihe earth near 8000, would leave an ocean of fire 7800 miles deep ; an idea so contrary to the ordinary course and wisdom of nature, appears to me preposterous. I shall now make a few observations on the time that may have been required, according to our theory of depositions from the oceanic waters, to form ihe whole diameter of the earth. We have shown in note 1st, the power of geome- trical progression in two generations of herrings, ^nd thai in twenty years of generation, a mass of matter 19 m ^ could be produced, equal to ten of our globes, that is, allowing these generations to be undisturbed. Now that must have been the case in the oceanic waters of Genesis. In our seas, immense numbers are annually abstracted from the ocean by the fisheries. Not so in the primeval ocean : there was no abstraction of matter there whatever. The labours of the Zoophytes and other marine animals we infer, according to the opinion of the modern geologists, have been also " going on in ail former ages as at present,** and would be another immense source of geological formation. It has been staled by some geologists, that the sedi- mentary rocks have taken a million of years in their formation. This is no doubt grounded on the sup- {osilion that past i^olcanic action and convulsion have been the same as at present. I trust, however, to have shown in our theory, that volcanic and convulsive forces must have been immensely greater and more frequent in the primeval ages ; and I believe that a million of years ago, if the globe were then in being, there was detritus enough, arising from that volcanic action, to produce a million timed the masses of rock, that any " causes now in operation" could do, and am more confirmed in this opinion from the vast difTcr- ence that must have then existed in the tenacity of the formations, compare \ with their present stale. Whatever length of period however might have been actually employed, we trust we can give it by our explanation of the 1st verse of Genesis; but we are not of opinion that the laws for the formation of the globe, required any such immense periods of time as is supposed by some geologists. Their comparative scale of formation, drawn from the present actual for- m! i i ' li il! llll 22 mankind have for disbelieving the remainder? But, fortunately even these " wonders of geology," cannot effect this. For first, I verily believe that the carbo- niferous formations offer sufficient evidence that they were produced before the separation in the universal ocean of Genesis ; I believe thnt these immense club mosses, these arborescent ferns* so immensely larger than any of the present day, were marine ; for I can never believe that any difference of climate could make such immense difference in the size of the plants. In examining coal, that is, not including Lignites or brown coal, in any part of the earth, we find no traces of woody fibre, which, had it been formed of terrestrial trees, would probably have been apparent. Coal ap- pears more likely to have been formed of some soft pulpy mailer such as sea-weed, and to have acquired its present appearance by great heat and pressure, and decomposition. This opinion of the marine formation of coal issupporlcd by Mr. Maletrenck. In Sullivan's View of Nature, letter 38, page 109, Mr. Maletrenck, in treating on the origin of coal, snys — **But this is a sul)jecl which we must examine more closely. Vegetables, as I have said, have been considei'cd as the cause of the foi mation of pit coal. A few forests, however, buried i;i the earth, are not sufiicient to foim the masses of coal.^ which exist in its bowels. A greater cause, more proportioned to the magnitude of the efTeci, ib rc(juired,and we find it only * Lee, in ]iis Elementary Gooloofy, pajre 67, says, "in treatinj^oiiihe coai formations, vegetables also wliich are now mere herbs, then attained tlie size ot large trees, as for example, ferns, which though tiiey now attain the height of a few feet at the niost, then gvew as large as our tallest trees," 23 in that prodigious quantity of vegetable matter winch grows in the seas^ and is increased by the imnnense masses which are carried down by the rivers ; these masses are agitated and broken dowrf by the waves, and afterwards covered by argillaceous or calcareous earth, and are decomposed. Nor is it more diflicult to conceive how these masses of marine and other vegetables may form the greater part of the coal, than that shells should form the greater part of the globe. The direct proof in support of this theory are the presence of aquatic and marine substances. The ^jo'ls which contain coal are generally ofschistus and grit; and as the formation of pyrites, as well as that of coal, comes from the decomposiiion of vegetable and animal substances, (for sulphur has been proved to exist naturally in vegetables and animals) all pit coal is more or less pyritous, so that we may consider pit coal as a mixture of pyrites, schistus and bitumen." Mr, Maletrenck thus supports our idea of the origin of coal in the secondary formations. I have to add as a further support of this theory, that all coal contains ammonia or its elements. Now terrestrial trees or vegetables will not account for this ingredient of coal. We know% moreover, that the remains of immense masses of animals must have been deposited in the oceans. The remains of whales, sharks, salmon, and all other fish, many species of whi^h I believe are seldom found in the earth fossilized, must have been deposited some wiiere in the ocean, and it appears probable that coal has derived its ammonia from these sources. At all events terrestrial vegetab'ea alone will not account for it, for they do not afford one of its elements, azote. Hi ' 24 But whether time and further observations will prove these opinions correct or not, still the story of the "beautiful country of the Iguanodon" can be accounted for, without overthrowing the narration of Moses. Volcanic action, as I have shown above, must have been immensely more active before the separa- tion, and pending the subaqueous formation of the earth in the ocean of Genesis, than at present. It is possible therefore, that some mountainous countries, may have been elevated above the surface of the waters long previous to the separation of the " dry land of Genesis." and these mountancous countries may have been tenanted by these reptile tribes, and covered by these immense palms, coniferous ferns, club mosses, fine rivers, lakes, &c., for many ages previous to the separa- tion, when the great bulk of the land was made to "appear," and thus the Mosaic account will be yet maintained iji its integrity, notwithstanding the exist- ence of the beautiful country of the " Iguanodon." Page 42, line 15, read — As the great discoveries in Pneumatic Chemistry, made during the last 50 or 60 years, may not be known to many of my readers, I here subjoin a short account of them. About the beginning of that period, Mr. Black, of Edinburgh, first discovered that the change of lime-stone into lime, by burning, was nothinsf more than the extrication of its carbonic acid gas from the lime-stone by the heat employed. This discovery excited the attention of chemical philosophers to seriform bodies; and Mr. Black's name will be venerable as long as science is cultivated. A few years afterwards, Mr. Cavendiu!* discovered the highly important fact, that water was composed of the bases of the two gases, oxygen and hv • m( wt of dec due bv 25 hydrogen, which was further proved by the experi- ments of Dr. Priestly, and the exact composition of water was finnily confirmed by the acc.urate analysis of Lavoisier and other French chemists, who, having decomposed the water into its elementary gases, repro- duced it by the ignition of the same gases ; and finding by repeated experiments, the weight of the water always equal to the gases produced, and vice versa that the gases emploved to form the water, always produ:!cd an c qua! weight of it. Subsequent chemists have verified these results, and it is now universally allowed, that all water consists of one part of hydrogen, and eight parts of oxygen by weight. Our atmosphere has been f irid to be composed of eighty parts of mephitic or azotic gas, and of twenty parts of oxygen gas. These three gases, oxygen, hydrogen, and azote, which may be called primary, iiavo since been discovered by chemists in almost every part ot the vegetable, animal and mineral king- doms, in which also a great variety of compound gases are disc(»vercd every year. Page 51, line 17, read — This idea ot no heal in the sun, arose iti port from the existence of ice and snow on high mountains in the torrid zone, which is now tho- roughly explained from terrestrial causes, by Lambin, Do Lui, Bougan. and De Saussure. Pai^e 51, line 23, read — "A fact v\ell known,** says De Saussure, ** and which proves strongly to my mind that the action of the solar rays, (considered in them- selves, and independent of all exterior causes of cold,) is as grout on the tops of mountains as in the level country, is, that the force of a lens is the sane at all ff n T I i! 26 heights. I am therefore convinced with Bougan," con- tinues he, " that the principal reason of the cold which reigns on the tops of mountains is, that they are always surn»unded and covered by an air that is invariably cold, and that that air is coid because it cannot be greatly heated, neither by the rays of the sun, in con- sequence of the transparency of this air, nor by the surface of the eaith, on account of its distance from that surface." Page 61, line 19, read — Having now presented to the public the th'-ory of the sun's ibrmaibn, arising, as I conceive, oaturally, from the stupendous quantity of light and heat which must have evolved from tliie combustion of the gases required for the formation of the ocean of (jlenesis, and having therein given my ideas on the manner in wh/'ch the waste of the sun's light and heat may be r«:';)]e,""shc(l, I purpose now to make a few observations on ♦he (pinion slated by Dr. Her- schell as to the opaque ie^.s of th'"! sun, and also of the spots which are found on or oijjaccnt to, his surface, Sharon Turner, in his Sacred History, page 46, vol. 1st, savs — "Of the actual substance of the sun, solittlo satisfactory to our jiulgmcn!. has been discovered, that all which is mentioned concerning it, can rank no higher than conjectures more or less plausible. Dr. Herschell thought his body to be opaque with an upper stratum of black luminous clouus. Black spots of vary- ing magnitude and form are continually appearing upon it and receding ;" and in a Note from La Place, page 20, it is said — " Dr. Herschell has inferred that what he deems the sun's luminous atmosphere, is 2,500 miles from its surface.'* ;-;*;:iKtt5i 27 The preface to Sharon Turner's Work is dated 1832. IThe first edition of mine was published in 1836 ; — his observations as to the substance of the.sun could not* therefore, include it } ahd 1 shall now make one final observation in support uf the probability of my system, namely, that it is, t conceive, highly probable, the Deity, would convert the stupendous quantity of heat and light which must have been extricated from the combustion of the gases of which the oceanic waters are formed, to some great purpose. The fabric of the sun thereby, was it not the most prominent and necessary one he could have applied it to ? Now, respecting Dr. Herscheirs opinion as to the opaqueness of the sun, as I am well aware of the exalted talents of that philosopher, and equally con- scious of my own want of scientific knowledge to cope with them, 1 must leave the decision on the validity of my theory of the sun to men of scientific acquirements, should it meet their eye ; and in that case, I beg to submit to them, should they agree to that validity two questions : — 1st. The luminous atmosphere of Doctor Herschell being, as he says, 2,500 miles from the sun, will it not be accounted for by the vast bodies of hydrogen and oxygen gases I have supposed, by their combustion, to serve as elementary fuel for the sun? Also — the spots on the sun's surface, or as some say, adjacent thereto, may they not be accounted for by the above said cause, from the denser volume of aqueous vapour which must be produced by this vast combustion of hydrogen ? The combustible gases would probably be ignited at the distance mentioned, (2,500 miles from the sun) and no doubt they would prove luminous enough. I. h I i H'i ,»1 il riliMfillll riM 28 2nd. If, as it has been lately suggested, our almes- phericheatis ptoduced by the sun's rays operating on a calorific medium, can we allow this heat to be pro« duced by any other means than by abstraction from that medium ? Heat is undoubtedly a material substance, and whencespever it is abstracted by the sun's rays, and carried olf, must not a corresponding degree of cold be produced ? and must not the whole extent of the space between the earth and the sun become continually more and more refrigerated, unless some means are found for replenishing this waste of heat ? and this we humbly conceive^ our theory of the sun will do. 1 wish here to reply to a suggestion on our theory, by a person of some scientific acquirements. This was an idea that the gases (which in the above theory we conceive to be employed in supplying the waste of the sun's light and heat) might be ignited before arri* ving at the sun's atmosphere, and thereby endanger the planets. This person, however, observed, that as Sir Humphrey Davy's safety lamp precludes any bad effects in mines, nature may have prepared some con- trivance to ensure safety in the regions of space. The observation was judicious ; for if the science of feeble man can counteract the evil on earth, how much more easily can the power do so who rules the heavens ! Jn fact it is not difficult to conceive an effective mode which may be employed by nature to ensure the safety required. Neither oxygen gas, nor hydrogen gas, are inflammable 7?er se, that is when not in contact with each other ; and it is easy to conceive that each species of gas may come from opposite points of the regions of space. Oxygen may come from the parts of the hei wh] me( ati igni| thei 29 lieavens above the sun ; hydrogen from those parti which are below it — and thus, both streams never meet, till they enter their centre of attraction, the atmosphere or body of the sun ; by which means no ignition whatever could take place, until they arrived there. Moreover, there is hardly a doubt, the tails of comets consist of inflammable gaseous matter; and these bodies traverse the regions oi space perhaps in all directions, without injury to the planetary bodies. I now present to the reader a short outline of Sir Richard Phillips* Theory of the cause of the motions of the heavenly bodies, taken from a work called *' Wonders of the Heavens," Lecture 2nd, page 30, printed for Richard Phillips, London. I make this extract as presenting a singular sanction of our theory, of the existence of a gaseous medium in the regions of space ; but do not agree with him in rejecting the New- tonian principle of gravity and attraction, and refer our readers to our observations thereon in the introduction to this edition. "About 10 years passed from the discovery of the theory of gravitation, without any remarkable addition to it, till llie year 1818, when Sir Richard Phillips, in some essays on the proximate causes ol the phenomena of the universe, impeached the entire theory founded on the simultaneous existence of universal gravitation, projectile force, and an alleged vacuuin in space. This writer has shown that Hook's Law of Gravity, which Newton so fortunately applied, is not a universal law, but a law created locally by the transfer of motion through any medium, such as the medium of space, and that the motions of nature, necessarily propagated according to that law, are, in truth, the cause of all the 3* f. *-' m 30 phenomena which heretofore had been ascribetl to the occult and unintelligible principles of attraction and gravitation. Hence, a? the law called the law of gra- vity, which Newton applied to the problems ofhis Principia, is proved not to be universal, and not an innate property, but an accident of matter, so t!i jre no longer exists any occasion for the projectile force with which Newton endowed the planets to prevent their falling into the sun ; nor was it any longer necessary to extinguish the medium, whiqh it may be supposed is co-existent with space, for the purpose of conferring perpetuity on the projectile force. He considered all matter as the possible parent of motion, and m oiion as power, and then proceeded to show, that all bodies on the earth are the parents of its motions, and that its motions are competent to produce all the phenomena which we witness on earth ; that weight or gravity is the mere effect of motion, or a ten- denc)^ to move by the transferred impetus of the earth's motions ; in fine, that twofold motions are powers of aggregation in all planets ; and that these motions, or that of the stin, propagated through the medium of space^ diverge as the square of the distance, and act with the same precision through an elastic medium, as a lever of iron. He showed also, that the fall of bodies to the eaith, ascribed to terrestrial gravitation, is a necessary result of the twofold motions of the earth, and that all the phenomena heretofore explained, by a principle which, considered as universal, led to many- false analogies, are mere results of motions, or acci» dents of matter, altogether local and mechanical. The philosophy of material phenomena promulgated bv Sir Richard Phillips, leaches that the univerae con- 81Sl rel| m( J to the ion aod of gra- 3 ofhis not an -'i jre no ce with nt their cessary ipposed if erring [rent of 3ded -to ts of its •roduce 1 ; that ' a ten- earth's rcrs of ons, or um of id act am, as Dodies is a earth, bv a nany acci^ jated con- 31 sists of extension of matter under various expansive gaseous, fluid, and ifixed forms of body, proceeding in relative densiiy from the rarest and most extended fluid media, to the most condensed aggregate of fixed atoms. "In fine," says Sir Richard Philh'ps, "motions of matter, subject to regular mechanic"' laws» acting abso- lutely or subordinately, generally or locdly, on aggre- gates or atoms, and producing various densities, and different degrees of locomotion, and affinity, in atoms of matter, of different constituent forms, are the proxi- mate causes of all the phenomena ; and as one series of phenomena depends on another, so all existing pheno- mena are, in regard to others, physically fit, compatible and harmonious; and as matter cannot originate its own motion, so in considering motion as the proximate cause of all phenomena, we arrive through the ascend- ing series, at the necessary and sublime First Cauye of all motion and all phenomena."* Page 35. The next sanction of our theory of the existence of gaseous matter in the sun's atmosphere, we take from Sir John HerschelTs Astronomy of last yaxr, page 407, chapter 12. " We shall conclude this chapter by the mention of a phenomenon which seems to indicate the existence of some slight degree of nebulosity about the sun itself, and even to place it in the list of nebulous stars. It is called the Zodiacal light ; and may be seen any very clear evening soon after sunset, about the month of April or May, or, at the opposite season of the year, before sunrise, as a cone or lenticular shaped light, * It being thought by eorae that Sir Richard Phillips' Theory- was of Atheistical tendency, I have extracted the foregoing^ paragraph to show the reverse, ,,^r. '^'^ I.:'->i?'' •" •"' 1 111 iui II \v m i|!!j ; f 'I |ii !'i* 1 iwtau 32 extending from the horizon, obliquely upwards, and following generally the course of the ecliptic, or rather that of the sun*s equator. The apparent angular distance of its orbit from the sun varies according to circumstances from 40*^ to OO'^, and the breadth of its base perpendicular to its axis from 8° to 30°. It is extremely faint and iil dofined, at least, in this climate,, though better seen in tropical regions. It cannot be mistaken for any atmospherical meteor or Aurora Borealis. It is manifestly in the nature of a thin lenticular ly formed atmosphere, surrounding the sun, and extending at least beyond the orbit of Mer- cury and even of Venus, and may be conjectured to be no other than the denser part of that medium, which, as we have reason to believe, resists the motion of comets, loaded perhaps with the actual mateiiais of the tails of millions of them, of which they have been strip- ped in their successive perihelion passages, and which may be slowly subsiding into the sun." It appears hei*eby that Sir John completely sanc- tions the existence of gaseous matter m the sun s atmos- phere. And for what other purposes could it be there, but for the supply of the waste of its light and heat by the combustion oi this gaseous matter ? And Sir John may well say, as he does in the above most admirable treatise on Astronomy, *'that there is an enormous degree of heat in the sun." The last extract we shall here make, as sanctioning our theory of supply of the waste of the sun's heat and light, is from a work published in 184J, called "Gra- ham's Elements of Chemistry." " It has always been observed that there is a black line or lines among the lays received from the sun through the prism on the 33 jpectrum. These black lines philosophers had not been able to account for. But the fttmosphere of the sun has now received an entirely chemical character ffom late experiments of the celebrated Sir David Brewster, who found that on passing a ray of light from a common lamp through a medium of nitrous oxydgas, >i f:>rmed a thousand black lines on the spec- trum. He, Sir David, thence infers (in accounting for the black lines when rays are received from the sun) that gaseous matter exists in the sun's atmosphere, by which medium the black lines are produced on the apectrum/* Doctor Graham adds, " that we may thus be able hereafter to explain how the light of the suns of other systems ie formed and maintained/' He thus evidently considers that the mode of sup- plying the waste of our own sun's light and heat is explained by means of this gaseous atmosphere, and thereby supports our theory of the combustion of that matter for producing that supply.* On a review of these concurrent teslimonies, wc, with humility, conceive therefore that our theory of the original formation of our sun, by the light and heat evolved by the combustion of the gases for the for- mation of the universal ocean of Genesis; and of the mode of supplying the waste of the smrs light and heat ruay be considered as nearly established. Page 100, after line 24, read-r-ln Evans* Agricul- tpre, printed at Montreal, it is said, page 51, "The ashes of stalks of wheat gathered a month before the * The above extract is taken from memory, but the sub- stance will be found in Graham's i^Iem^nts, . i' m ]:• 34 e^TSi'jfpf r'n? "s-.'"' ™'''-' 'eaves wi.h. •a/Is in 100 Dart, ^,fu ^''"=" and 65 of AlkZt!^ «nJ 'vhenrn'o^ of .ht eaves^»°'* '"■•^''«'" «- «"£ salts." Thus, at one «.r?L f.^ °"'^ ^* ofAJkaline parts, and at ano.her 3^1 Sn,"™'^/'""^'n^ 12 h •'.'"I'he plant is comi.fg 'o iS ^M-r'' ')''' J"« « " tills Silica fiad bepn t=i? i"" g''»wih. Now the straw ; but if, as by our,hV^^\'"^"^<'^ "irough '.f the vegetable fjiVthe L^.h"''^ ""^ ^"''' '""""ions «l'em, the above m^f .^ , '''* J"'' a^ they require accounted for.* °'' ''"S"'^-- 'act will be^ thereby consider the hrmament ,o Sr ICT'' "'"^^ ^^"«« atmosphere. N„^^, ,1,; ° '^nd » mean solely, the above the earth Bri7^ °^ °°''' only fortv-five mil^ CO umn of equal bre ftof^^^^' l'^''"'''^' «<=«ed a "'le deep, i„\espect to the reh,f/ "'° ^""^ Part of a each column wolild contain !nf*^"'"""'««of^ater plants at this period." ""^«« «'">«« -"ore Silica is formed inX' ^e^irnZl' '° "'"■'"" "y "Oiling exceeds the bulUfthe 35 " Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters,*' which, even in our oceans, would be two miles deep. But tiie 9th verse will make it clear .that the word " firmament" cannot refer to our atmosphere. " And God made the firmament, and divided ihe waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above thefirmament^ and it was so." Thus, it is evident, that, in either sense of the word, an ocean of waters is here stated to exist above the atmosphere. And as it is very remarkable that no part of the first chapter of Genesis gives any direct account of the for- mation of our atmosphere, we may, perhaps, conclude, that it was formed in the "beginning" when "God created the heavens and the earth" as per 1st verse ; and this is more probable, as we know one ingredient of our atmosphere then existed, namely, oxygen, used in the coinbustion, lor the formation of the oceanic waters o! Genesis, and that air would, probably, bo required for the animals thereof, during the formation of our eailh in those waters. i \ 1% Page lOi), from foot of page, read as follows j'—^ NOTES TO SECOND EDITION. Note 1. In corroboration of our Notes to 1st edition numbers 14 and 15, on the powers of the vegetative functions to produe the primary earths, we have now to add a -:tatement from Sharon Turner. In his " Sa- cred History of the World," vol. 1st, page 93, he says, " Vegetables have even some relation with the Mineral Kingdom ; for they do not only form the carbon they contain, but some have been found to have copper particles," (and in a note it is said) •' That copper exists m ijjti'ammmssii 36 in a great number of vegetables, was announced in 1 W7. Mr. Targean found five millogrames of copper in a killograme of grey quinquina, eight in Martinico coffee, and nearly eight in wheat." (Bull. Univ. page 1 39.) He continues, " And several vegetables secrete flint and likewise sulphur, as in our common corn," (and in a note it is said) " Sulphur exists in combination with different bases in wheat, barley, rye, oats, maize, millet, and rice.,, (Lindsay's Nat. Bot. p 393.) Mr. Tnrner continues, " We may add iron and gold also, for both of tliese have been found in vegetables." And in page 393, in a note it is said, " The energy and even creative agency of the living principle of plants appears in its power of converting material par- ticles into other substances. Experiments Oii vegeta- bles seem to prove that the solid matter which entered into their composition in the more advanced period of their growth, must, in part at least, have been produced by some action of the vitol powers and could not have been obtained ab. extra." — Bui. Physic, page 307, and Dr. Thompson's Ch. JN^ote 2, Since publishing the first edition of this work, I have found that Doctor Thompson, in his Chemistry, says, " We are certain that no particle of light weighs more than the million millionth part of a grain." — Chemistry, vol. 1st, p. 300. Note 3. Doctor Chalmers, in his Natural Theology published in 1830, page 250, says, *' We shall advert once more to the Mosaic ac ount of the creation, more especially as the reconciliation of this history with the indefinite antiquity of the globe, seems not impossible, most and and that, withoat the infliction of any Tidtoi^ce tfn tte literalities of tho record.'* fie then narrn ^s the t#b firit veneBxif l8t of Grenesis, and addn, " rtowlet it bft supposed that the work of the first day in the Nfosaie account, begins with the ** Spirit f>f Cud moving on the face of the waters." The detailed history of creation, in the 1st chapter of Crenesis, begins with the middle of the second verse, and what precedes might be under- stood as an introductory sentence, by which we are most appositely told that God created all things at first, and that afterwards, at what interval of time is not specified, the earth lapsed into a chaos, from the darkness and disorder of which the present system of economy was made to arise. By this hypothesis, nei- ther the 1st verse nor the first half of the second, forms any part of the narration of the first day's operation, the whole forming a preparatory sentence disclosing to us the initial act of^ creation^ at some remote and undefined period ; and the chaotic state of the world at the commencement of those successive acts of creative power, by which out of rudo and undigested materials the present harmony of nature was ushered into being. Between the initiai act and the details of Genesis, the world, for aught we know, might have been the theatre of many revolutions, the traces of which Geology roay^ yet investigate^ and to which, in fact, she has constantly appealed, as the vestiges of so many successive continents which have now passed away. The speculation has ofi[cred a vain triumph to infidielity, seeing first, that the historical evidence of scripture is quite untouched by this pretended discovery of scieiHsei undatbat even) should it turn out to he a substaniial drscoyery, they do not comeiqto caHtstofi M liji f/ 111' 1''! 'i „"' ! 11 1 SKBES 3CS -■'.ar.- 38 with the narrative of Moset. Should, in particular, the explanation we now offer be sustained, this would permitnn indefinite scope to the conjectures of Goology, and without undue liberty to the 1st chapter of Genesis. Thus, Doctor Chalmers has conHrmed, in the year 1830, the explanation of the 1st verse of Genesis, we had, OS sated above, formed in 1825. But, with his idea of the earth lapsing into a chnos we do not at all agree; on the contrary, there is strong reason to believe, that from "the beginning" the undeviating design wns carrying on, of the formation of the solid parts of the earth in the waters of Genesis, as stated in our theory ; and this, the 0th verse shews ; for. the earth, having been duly formed by the continued depositions of the waters, was separated from them as appears by that verse. Note 4. In further confirmatiou of the construction we have put upon the Jst verse of Genesis, it will bo found, that the Rev. Dr, Adam Clarke, in his com- mentaries on the scriptures, says, in commenting on this verse " that the true translation of it from the Hebrew is * In the beginning God created the elements or substance* to form the Heavens and the Earth." Yet, it is to be observed that a great part of mankind have, perhaps, received the erroneous idea from their infancy, " that the world was made out of nothing." Now, Doctor Chalmers, in a lafe publication of his, on Astronomy, says, " that no part of the scriptures asserts that the world was made out of nothing." Modern science has proved that most of the liquids and solids of the vegetable and animal kingdom are formed, in great part, of gaseous bodies ; and the very 39 days and sands we walk on, which were fornnerly con- sidered mere earths, have been proved by Sir H. Davy's experiments in Galvanism, to consist, in great part, of Oxygen, which must be combined with the bases of these earths in a solid state. But for the origin of the elementary gases, of whose composition or origin we are yet ignorant, we must refer to a creating cause. Note 5. In the Edinbargh Review of Buckland's Bndgewater Treatise, the U)llowing extract appears from that work. " It is marvellous that mankind have gone on for so many centuries in ignorance of the fact, which is now fully proved, that no small part of the present surface of the earth is derived from the remains of animals that constituted the population of ancient seas. Many extensive plains and massive mountains form as it were the great charnel house of proceeding generations, in which the petrified exuviae of extinct races ot vegetables and animals are piled up, into stupendous monuments of life and death, during almost immeasurable periods of past time." Mr. Ehrenberg, an eminent naturalist has £?ince Dr. Buckland's Treatise, discovered by the microscope, the existence of fossil animalculee, or infusoiial organic remains, which form extensiva strata of tripoly or poleschiefer (polishing slate at Franzenbad in Bohemia. The animals belong to the genius Bacularia, and inhabit siliceous shells, the accumulation of which form the strata of polishing slate. The size of one of these animalculas is the 3,000th part of an inch. Yet notwithstanding the conviction which Dr. Buckland so forcibly expresses, of the vast profusion of vegetabid II 1 < I' m II!!! 1,1!' pi *t MiMttMMMWi 40 and animal Hfe whicb must have existiid in the ancient seias, arid Which conld be no other than the waters or Ocean of Genesis, to which the Doctor agrees, by the extract from the Bridge water Treatise, (See page 5 of our preface to first edition) yet, notwithstanding this, he gives an opinion,in another part of that treatise, that animal life did not exist, previous to the formation of those strata of the earth where their remains arc first found; namely, the transition or secondary forma- tions. In Note 2nd, to our first edition, p. 102, we have given Mr. Lyall's opinion " that all traces of shells and other organic remains, may be destroyed in rocks, by a heat not amounting to fusion." If'our system of *he formation of the solid parts of our globe, by the primeval deposition of vegetable and animal re- mains, be approved ; it will perhaps, shew that internal heats and fires generated by the gases and metals of these remains, were much more frequent in those early periods of the world, than at present. It is therefore. no proof that vegetable and animal life did not exist prior to the transition formations and during the pri- mary, to say, that their organic remains are Fwt found there : an immensely less heat than that which must have been occasioned by the subterranean fires of the earth, previous to the separation of Genesis, would be sufficient to destroy all traces of organic remains, and to prdduce a chrystaltine structure, and new chemical combinations, as we find them at the present day. This objection, then, to the pre-existence of animal and vegetable life because no present remains are found ih the primary strata, is not, in my opinion, tena- bk. A grisat argument of the modern geologists is, "that the causes at present in operation, must have 41 i> ., been producing the same effects in all preceding ages." Therefore, by a parity of reasoning, conceiving the design of the Creator to have been, to produce the whole circumference and diameter of our globe, by the instrumentality of those natural causes and laws which we now see, every where in operation ; we infer that tha races of vegetable and animal life were continually employed for that end, since ihe foimalion of the pri- meval Ocean of Genesis, as stated in our system ; and that these races were competent thereto, the present formation of a large tract of the earth by even a few species of marine insects, evidently proves ; and it also proves, that the Deity could not have chosen, from among the laws of nature he had created, so energetic an agent of production, since even electricity, though nnuch more sudden and violent in its effects, has not the continuity of the agencies of life. The coral insect alone, has produced, as shewn in this work, an extent of land equal in length to one eighth of the diameter of our globe, and still continues its operation ; and it is even the opinion of some geologists, that another continent will, in time, be formed, in these seas by means of these insects. Doctor Buckland allows that some geologists are of opinion that fossil remains may have existed in the primary formations, and all traces of them may have been obliterated by the internal fires; but he appears himself to think, (and gives a quotation, I believe, from another writer,) that the incandescence of the earth was, during the primary formations so great, that no animals could have existed in the ocean. Now, if our theory be well founded, thai the same mighty energy of formation which has produced so n 42 large a part of the crust of the earth, (namely, the labours oi the marine animals during liie, and their depositions and those of the marine vegetables after death ;) if we allow that these same most powerful causes may have produced all the formations of the eartl^ through its entire diamater, the incandescence during the primary formations, will not render this theory untenable. By this theory, we account for the productions of the internal fires, by the ignition of the inflammable gases, and the metallic bases resulting from the decompositions of the vegetable and animal remains that had been deposited in the oceanic waters* and attracted to a centre by the laws of gravity ;ind pressure. When a sufficient thickness of mass of these re- rnains was thus accumulated, these internal fires would then be generated by the ignition of the inflammable matter of their remains, and during the existence ot these volcanic fires an incandescence might have been , produced over a great part of the earth, which, for a lime, would destroy the animals of the ocean near it ; but, as these fires could last only until the inflammabli matter that generated them was consumed; when that took place, the (then) crust of the earth would be copied down by the waters of the ocean, and further depositions of remains would take place, until again collected in suflicient thickness to reproduce internal fires and incandescence ; when the same refrigeration must, in time, have taken place, all the fuel of these ^res being again coiisumed. In fact, this itjcandescence may, perhaps, account for a geoglogical phenomenon stated by geologists, that ei^tire genera pf marine a pim?^!^ appear to have existed. ate stra then dest the whe ..jftauatjmt* 43 at ccrUln depths and have disappeared in subsequent SUata, when other genera and species have succeeded, them. May this not have happened by the sudden destruction of these genera by the incandescence, and the re-production or re-appearance of other genera when the refrigeration as above described, had taken place ? But further, if Doctor Buckland assents to the entire account of creation, contained in the first chapter of Genesis, which he may well do after agreeing that its first verse will account for all the wonders lately disco- vered by geology ; in this case it wi l;be seen that in our concluding note, page 108 and 109, we have shown that by the 7in verse, the waters of Genesis existed above the firmament, even allowing this word to mean, the atmosphere, as thought by some writers. In this universal ocean, by our theory, we conceive- the earth and planets to have been formed ; and we know from the Dth verse, the earth and its oceans were separated from these waters at the six days of the Mosaic account. This universal ocean must, there- fore, be of, perhaps, illimitable extent, and it is not pos- sible that the incandescence of one, or even all the planets, could have more than casually, and for a time, (as we have attempted to explain) prevented the depo- sitions and construction of the primary formations by the vegetable and animal kingdoms of this universol ocean. Heat always tenda to an equilibrium, water is a great conductor or at least an absorber of heat, flind the waters of this universal ocean would be con- tinually flowing over the earth, then fo: * in^ in it, until the equilibrium and consequent rer'^e^ tion ^ya^ ofirected. I ' H ,:' ji ' ' \ i ; ! ; 44 Note 6. In Good's Book of Nature, page 61, it is sfiid, * To show," says Sir Isaac Newton, on gravity, ** that I do not take gravity to bo an essentia! property of matter, I have added one question concerning its cause, choosing to propose it by way of question, be- cause I am not yet satisfied about it, for want of expe- riments." In this question he suggests " the existence of anetherial and chxstic medium pervading all space," and supports his supposition ' v sti'on^f aigumcnt, and consequently, much apparent confide ucc, deduced from the mediums or gases as they are now called, of h'ght and heat and magnetism, respecting all which, from their exireme subiiliiy, we can only reason con- cerning their properties. This elastic medium he con- ceives to be much rarer within the dense bodies of the sun, the stars, the planets and comets, than in the more empty celestial spaces between ihem; and to grow more and more dense as it recedes from the celestial bodies to still greater distance, by which means all of them, in his opinion, are forced towards each other by the excess of an clastic j)ressure. It is possible, un- douhlediy, to account fur the ellects of gravitation by an etherial medium thus constituted, provided, (as it is also necessary to suppose, that the corpuscles of such a medium, are repelled by bodies of common matter, with a force decreasing like ojic repulsive forces, simply as the distances increase. Its density under these circumstances, would be everywhere such as to produce the semblance of attraction* The hypo- thesis, in connexion with the existence of a repulsive force in common matter, has a great advantage in point of simplicity, and may perhaps hereafter be capa- ble of proof. But at present it can only be regarded; 45 and was at first only offered as an hypothesis.'**— {Qoocfs Book of Nature.) It is with great satisfaction I am 6nabled to present the reader of this second edition of my work, with the theory of the means by which the waste of the sun'a light and heat may be replenished. The opinion of this great man is " a host within itself/* and is the more grateful to me, as this part of m) theory (the possible existence of gaseous bodies in the regions of iofunitc space, was the part 1 was most doubtful of,) and I now trust our theory, having this sanction, may be submitted to the knowledge and judgment of scientific men with greater probability of their approving it. Note 7. In the Montreal Herald of 1 3th September, 1838, the following notice appeared : — '*Encke*s comet begins to be tniked of. This comet which completes its revolution in 1200 davb, will be visible in the ensu- ing autumn. It will be in its perihelion or part ol its orbit nearest the sun on the 15th December ; about the same period it will be nearest the eurih. It is (says M. Arago) a vast nebulosity, 64,000 times larger in volume than the earth ; yet, such is the tenuity of its substance, that in 1795, Sir Wm. Herschell was able to discover through its mass, a star of the 20th mag^ nitude. It must be an embryo planet, not yet reduced from vapour to a liquid globose volume, ajterwards to be converted into an ocean and earth, and organic formation,** * There must certainly be some n)p(l« existing to restore thA vast waste of heat and light emitted continually by the sun» an'i peirhaps our theory of , applying this waste may furnish, tne proof abov^ required of Sir Isaac Newton's hypothesis. ,M: rn in ':■ 46 Here then, is a complete confirmation (as far as the opinion and judgment of Mr. Arago will go with men of science,) of the theory of the possible formation of our ocean, earth, and organic formations which we have in this work ventured to present to the world. Mr. Arago is one of the leading astronomers of the present day. Note 8. In Sharon Turner's " Sacred History," vol. 1st, page 169, in a note, it is said, " Linnaeus has only three kinds of Marine plants, fuci centenas and ulves. But Lamoreux, has shewn, that they have several natural families ; he proves that the hydrophytes have a more complicated anatomy ihan has been known. He divides them into six families. Lamoreux has re- marked, that the basin of the Atlantic to 40 degrees north has a marked vegetation ; so has the West Sea of the Indies, comprising the Gulf of Mexico, likewise the vast coast of South America, the Indian Ocean and its gulfs, and the shores of New Holland. The Medi- terranean has also a vegetation peculiar to itself, and extending to the Black Sea." — BulL Univers, 1800, page 108. Note 9. The Right Hon. and Rev. Francis Henry Earl of Bridgcwater, died in the month of February, 1829, and by his last Will and Testament he directed certain Trustees to invest in the Public Funds the sum of eight thousand pounds sterling, to be held at the disposal of the President of the Royal Society of Lon- don, to be paid to the person or persons nominated by him. The Testator furthcv directed, that the person or persons nominated by the said President, should be vl 47 appointed to write, pnnt» and publish 1000 copies of a work on the Wisdom and Goodness of God, as mani- fested in the Creation. There wero eight Treatises on various subjects. The Reverend Doctor Buckland lyas appointed to write the Bridge water Treatise on Geology. NOTE TO THIRD EDITION. Note. I have perceived in Dr. Thomson's "Organic Chemistry,'* some account of the experiment of Von Helmont, (seep, 43) wherein it is stated, that a certain author has stated an opinion that the distilled water used in it contained sufficient earthy matter to account for the increase of the willow. This, I venture to say, is incorrect, for, in the first place, there is no earthy matter that is volatile at the heat of the boiling point of water ; neither if the earth were reduced to a saline form by acids, would they be volatile or evaporate at that heat ; moreover, the quantity of water used in the five years could not have been more than 456 gallons, that is one quart per day. Now, it is not conceivable that distilled water could contain more than i of an ounce of earth per gallon, which makes 7 lbs. The willow, however, gained 110 lbs. in the five years, making 103 lbs. ptoduced from the water and atmos* phere by the process of vegetation in the five years. ^j I !.' ■! I ■ 111 ,y ii 48 I am h^PPy to be able to present the reader of the Pourth Edition of this work with two important ex- tracts from late scientific publications. The one is from the celebrated Arago» the French Astronomer, and the other from Lurdner's Popular Lectures in the American Stater I now present ^^3 blowing extract from Arago's Scientific Notices o.n Coij(i)licd ibis heal and light to a move n.'cdful purpose. Many of my subcribers to ii)o sevcial Editions of my theory, and also m.-uiy men of scienci', have done me tho h'onoui' to approve of the same ; but 1 have reason to believe thai a few oilier persons, considering l!;cmse!ves, no dotjbl, of too superior acquirements to approve of anytliir.g tliat liad not been previously taught in tlio schools of science, have i aihcr sneered at this, whicl] I wiili humiliiy had prosenicd to t!io world. However, as iho justly celebialcd Franklin's su^'f^estionsof llu) idcnlity-rLighlninL^and Eleclricily wenj at fiisl laughed ai by the lloyrd Society of Lon- don, I need not be surprised thai the same may have nppened to mv suggestions on the nature of the sua lid his combus'tion. " But now that the gaseous theory u verified by so great authorities as Mr. Arago and Uio Paris OLscrvalorv, as siiown by Doctor Lardner, 1 cannot but fc;! content and gratified, By the extract h an S3 ts to ouslv ccred t!ic klin's jicily Lon- have c Sim icory » and dner, ctract / \ from Arn*vo, it appears that the spots on the sun might exist and be accounted for and e.xpl;iincd by i\fr,iscou$ medium, — tiiis being the case, there is no longer any necessity lor receiving that very improbable iden, that the sun's body is cold and opaque, and I therefore trust our theory will be found by scieniifie men to bo more satisfactory, and correctly founded in nature. In fact, it appears by Doctor Lardnor's obiter vations on this discovery of Arago of the iion pnlarization of the light of ihc sun, that it is rnalheniaiifally proven by hini ihat the sun's surface is an * 0('KAN OF FLAIME ;" and I conceive vvc are hereby juistified in reasoning by analogy, that the case is llie ^arne with the suns or stars of all the systems. Conceiving then that that part of our ilicory rela- ting to tlic sun's substance and natuic has been tlms (to me indeed unexpectedly) demons! r;i led by that very high branch of science, the poIarizati(^n of fj'ght, and conceiving also that it is unquesiionabl(\ ihat great as the sun's bulk is, the unceasing emanation of his heat and light would, in time, exhaust bis substance, and thcreiorc the waste must necessarily be supplied with extraneous combustible matter : so I trust that that part of our theory which relates to the supply of that waste, will also be rendered more highly probable by the ab vc discovery. One would, indeed, have imagined that by a priori reasoning op this waste of the sun's liglit and heat, philosophers might of old have inferred tliat il must be supported ab extra, but now that the gaseous nature of the sun's incandescence is verified, as shown above, and as Sir John Herschell has shown in his late ad- mired work on Astronomy, that the gaseous tails of 6* 54 numerous cometa are deposited in the sun*s vicinity. There can hardly be ;\ doubt that the gaseous fuel for the sun's fire must either be produced therebv, or as by the theory of >ny ivoi k, from currents of the gases rush- ing through the regions of space for that purpose. It h indeed probable that both these sources of gaseous supply muy be employed in nature ; but the latter theory vviii also account for the tides by physical pres- sure, and for the great principle of attraction of the heavenly bodies, namely, the imp'Jtus of motion gene- rated by a gaseous medium rushing through the regions of space ; and I lui^c accordingly adopted that theory in my System of the Creation. NOTE TO FOURTH EDITION. In further corroboration of the formation of coal from marine plants and trees grown in the oceans, we observe that, in contemplating these immense masses of maiino vegetable matter, we have a right to ask of those who argue tcrrestiial formation, what has be- come of those masses of marine vf3gctation after the termination of their vegetable life? Undoubtedly there can be no other satisfactory account given of this than thallhcyhave, like all otherdcad vegetable matter, suficred decomposition, and by moans of the super- incumbent pressure of other deposils of the oceans, and volcanic heats, have been changed and converted into seams of coal, as we now find them. There they lay, containing a considerable quantity of ammonia, icceived from their contact with the ani- mal deposits of the ocean i, and which ammonia cannot be acconnied for by the theory of formation from 55 icinily. ue! for r asby IS rush- se. It ;aseous lai:er il pres- of the 1 gene- regions theory )f coal ns, we masses ask of las be- er the 3tcdly of this natter, super- |)ceansi verted antity e ani- ;annot from terrestrial vegetables, for these yield very little or no ammonia. In proof of the diversity of marine production, I extract the following account of that immense sea plant the ♦♦ Fucus Giganlicus" from the celebrated Professor Liebig's familiar Letters on Chemistry. — Letter IJ, page 34. «* We well know that marine plants cannot derive a supply of humus for their nourishment through their roots. Look at the great sea- tang, the Fucus Gigan* ticus : this plant, according to Cook rcu(;lies a height of 360 Icet and a single specimen, with its immense ramifications, nourishes thousands of marine animals t yet its root is a small body, no larger than the fist. What nourishment can this draw from a naked rock, upon the surface of which there is no perceptible change? It is quite obivous that these plants require only a hold — a fastening to prevent a cliangc of place as a counterpoise to their specific gravity, wl;ich is less than that of the medium in which they float. That medium provides the necessary nourishtrieiit, and pre- sents it to the surface of every part oi' the plant. Sea- water contains not only carbonic acid and ammonia, but the alkaline and earthy phosphates and carbonate s required by these plants for their growth, and which we always find as constant constituents of their ashes." As some supposed astronomical causes are being produced in support of an idea that the dry land has existed several hundred thousand years, which is con- trary to the interpretation of the Mosaic account, 89 explained in our system, and founded on the idea that 56 the coal seams have each taken thousands of years for formation from terrestrial vegetables, which idea is purely gratuitous ; we have to call the attention of the reader to the note confirming our arguments for the marine formation of coal. ADDITIONS TO THE GLOSSARY OF TERMS. Aj)petencie&% a supposed aptness of matter to assume certain, forms. Affinity, that particular attraction which Chemists observe different bodies have for each other. Chaotic Mixture, a solution of all the solid substances of the Globe, supposed by the ancients to have existed. Galvanic Power, a species of electricity. Geology, the science of the various substances for^ning the interior and the crust of the earth. Matrix, the womb of material or spiritual substance. Orbits, the paths of the moons round their planets, aiid of the planets round their sun. Silicon, the metallic basis of siliceous earth or sand. Sodium, a metal lately discovered by Sir H. Davy, to bo the basis of soda, produced by marine plants. i 4 ,Y "v -