p 
 
 /a 
 
 <? 
 
 /a 
 
 A- 
 
 %^ # ^ > 
 
 op 
 
 /A 
 
 •^i'/v^i 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 ■- IIIIIM 
 
 ■ 5 '""^^ 
 
 
 I.I 
 
 1^ 
 
 1^ 
 
 |M 
 
 Z2 
 2.0 
 
 1.8 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 .^•0 
 
 // 
 
 
 S" 
 
 ^5^ ... /£^. 
 
 A 
 
 ^> 
 
 iV 
 
 V 
 
 & 
 
 ^ 
 
 y^ 
 ^ 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 
 *• 6" — 
 
 
 ► 
 
 "% 
 
 v 
 
 ^^ 
 
 
 N> 
 
 
 6^ 
 
 #^ 
 
 ^<j,L 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. 145B0 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHIVI/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notas/Notas tachniquas at bibliographiquas 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 Q 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couieur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Couverture endommagie 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie at/ou pellicul^e 
 
 I I Cover title missing/ 
 
 n 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes giographiques an couieur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couieur (i.e. autre que bleua ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couieur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli^ avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may ciuse shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distorsion le long da la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutAes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissant dans le texta, 
 mais, lorsque cela itait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas M film^es. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl^mentaires; 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemolaire 
 qu'il lui a iti possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique. qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquis ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couieur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaur^es et/ou pelliculies 
 
 E Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d^colorees, tacheties ou piquees 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ddtachees 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality inigale de ('impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materit 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 sdition available/ 
 Edition disponible 
 
 [~n Pages detached/ 
 
 r~7] Showthrough/ 
 
 nn Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 □ Only edition available/ 
 Seule 
 
 D 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, 
 etc., ont iti fiimies i nouveau de facon a 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This iterv; is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 y 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 2SX 
 
 32X 
 
Tha copy fllm«d h«r« hM bMn r«produe«(l thankt 
 to the gonoroslty of: 
 
 Library Division 
 : Provincial Archival of British Columbia 
 
 L'oxomplairo film* f ut roproduit grico i la 
 gAnAroaltA da: 
 
 Library Division 
 
 Provincial Archivas of British Columbia 
 
 Tha imagaa appaaring hara ara tha baat quality 
 poaaibia eonaldaring tha condition and lagibility 
 of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha 
 filming contract apaciflcationa. 
 
 Laa imagaa aulvantaa ont At4 raproduitaa avac la 
 plua grand aoin, compta tanu da la condition at 
 da la nattatA da raxamplalra film#, at ^n 
 conformity avac laa conditiona du contrat da 
 filmaga. 
 
 Original copiaa in printad papar covara ara filmad 
 beginning with tha front covar and anding on 
 tha laat paga with a printad or iliuatratad impraa- 
 aion, or tha bacit covar whan appropriata. Af^ 
 othar original copiaa ara filmad beginning on tha 
 firat paga with a printad or iliuatratad impraa- 
 aion. and anding on tha laat paga with a printad 
 or iliuatratad impraaaion. 
 
 Laa axamplairaa originaux dont la couvartura an 
 papiar aat imprimia aont filmAa an commandant 
 par la pramiar plat at an tarminant aoit par la 
 darnlAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'impraaaion ou d'illuatration, aoit par la aacond 
 plat, aalon ia caa. Toua laa autraa axamplairaa 
 originaux aont filmte an commandant par la 
 pramlAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'impraaaion ou d'illuatration at an tarminant par 
 ia darnlAra paga qui comporta una taila 
 amprainta. 
 
 Tha laat racordad frama on aach microfiche 
 ahali contain the symbol ^^- (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or tha symbol ▼ (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparattra sur ia 
 darnlAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 ces: le symbols -^ signifie "A 8UIVRE". le 
 symbols y signifie "FIN". 
 
 Meps. pletes. cherts, etc., mey be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right end top to bottom, es meny frames as 
 required. The following diegrems illustrete the 
 method: 
 
 Les certes. planches, tebieeux. etc.. peuvent Atre 
 fiimis i des teux de reduction diffArents. 
 Lorsque ie document est trop grend pour ttre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA, ii est film4 A partir 
 da i'angie supArieur geuche, de geuche A droite. 
 et de haut en bas. en prenant ie nombre 
 d'imeges nicesssire. Les diegrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mithoda. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
^r^i 
 
 
 SUMAS DYKING ACT 
 
 ;i '; 
 
 A FEW FACTS IN CONNECTION 
 
 m 
 
 WITH THE ABOVE ACT, 
 
 BY THE SETTLERS AND OWNERS OF L.\NI> 
 
 IN MATSQUI PRAIRIE. 
 
 
 PBINTEI) 
 
 BY THE PUPILS 
 
 of 
 
 ST. MARY'S MISSION SCHOOi. 
 
 1882. 
 
 •> 
 
 y»s- 
 
 .,^i,SgMi*»«l*«*» 
 
dh 
 
 CoUectiorL 
 
 -Q> 
 
UMAS DYKING ACT 
 
 ■>< 
 
 A FEW FACTS IN CONNECTION 
 
 WITH THE ABOVE ACT, 
 >Y THE SETTLERS AND OWNERS OF LANI^ 
 IN MATSQUI PRAIRIE 
 
 •™-c .ooOOCcc 
 
 PRUJTED 
 
 BY THE PUPILS 
 
 of 
 
 ;^T. i^IAHT'S MISSION SCHOOL. 
 
 1882. 
 
 <*■ <■ -...I 
 
PUMAS DYKING ACT. 
 
 :>oo00000ooc 
 
 From nil tliiit liis boon said sxvA written with regard 
 to the M.iiM[ui dyke constrnctetl or supposed to bo con- 
 structed under the jibovo act, it is somewhat singuhir, 
 althongh not to bo wondered at, that all tarns out a one 
 
 side version of the case, wherein there has been mani- 
 festly two. 
 
 We, the settlers on the Matsqui prairie, have from 
 time to time endeavoured to shed a ray of light in on 
 both sides of the question, in order that the public 
 might get a glimpse at the true state of the case, yet 
 wo could not succeed as the several Editors of the pro- 
 vincial papers refused to aid us by giving publicity to our 
 sentiments on the dyking project. 
 
 Towards the close of the year 1877, the settlers on 
 the Matsqui prairie desirous of reclaiming their land 
 and in order to guard against the periodical overflow of 
 the river, entered into an agreement with E. L. Derby to 
 erect a good, substantial dyke of sufficient extent so that 
 all the lands on the Matsqui prairie could be reclaimod, 
 the settlers on their part agreeing to pay the s:iid E. L. 
 Derby for construction of said dyke. According to tho 
 articles of agreement, tho dyke was to bb completed by 
 the first day of June 1878, and at said date should the 
 
 I., 
 
 i 
 
dyke prove a failure, they ^Yero lo pay only half tlie i\- 
 mouut; if a success, they were to pay the whole amount. 
 How were they to dctcnniiio the amount they had to 
 p:iy ? The dyke resisting; the periodical overflow of the 
 Frazer River was to be the criterion. 
 
 At this stage of the proceedings, E. L. Derby went 
 to Victoria and then laid before the Legislative Ass, n- 
 bly the Matsqui settlers' project for dyking of tl.eii- la ■!: 
 and on the 10th ol April 187B the Legislative Assembly 
 passed a special bill granting iu. L. Derby certain Crown 
 hiuds, as well as a right to levy assessments ( same "s a- 
 greed to in settlers' contract) and ivithout our Jtiiowleth/c 
 or consent gave an extension of time for completion of dy- 
 ke from July 1878 to July 1880. 
 
 The work under the Government contract began to- 
 ■vards the end of the Spring 1878, but with such a sm dl 
 lorce that it was not progressing at that rate that wouM 
 warrant its completion before the high water of 1879, 
 and so far as they had progressed, the work was not car- 
 ried out according to specifications, as may be seen by 
 official reports of Mr. Navarre, the Superintendent iu 
 charge. 
 
 Now we, the settlers, being the parties most deeply 
 interested in this dyking project, should at least have a 
 voice in a matter that so immediately concerns us, anil 
 in which our whole capital and labor has bejn invested. 
 
-a — 
 
 Liviiig as we are on the lantl, wo bliould Imve tho 
 best opportunity of knowing whether the tlyko under 
 consideration be u failure, or a success; and moreover 
 in justice to ourselves we possess the right of rejecting 
 or accepting it according to its merits; but as the affair 
 now stands, we are deprived of this right, and our sen- 
 timents and opinions on the subject totally ignored, 
 whilst wo are forced to accept a work as a success, whi- 
 1,9 in point of fact it has been proved a, complete failure 
 from its very found^Uon. 
 
 In proof of the above, we give the following extracts 
 from official reports of Mr. J. A. Navarre, superintendent 
 in charge, and of Mr. W. S. QQra, Q,i^rveyQr-General. 
 
 Supt. says: " With regard to the bulkhead work abo- 
 ve mentioned, I have to inform you that it is in no respect 
 in conformity with your instructions or n;iy directions, and 
 is all but ent'i-ely worthless for accomplishing the objects 
 for which it is intended. Many piles are insufficiently 
 driven. The sheeting is set in a shallow trench without 
 driving, and often is in two lengths, of five or six feet 
 each. Some of the liuuber is partly rotten and oth3rwi- 
 se defective. By pushing with my hands against som'j of 
 the piles not supported with girts I nearly toppled them 
 over. In some instinces there is but one g^irt where the- 
 re should be two." 
 
Fiirtlier oii ho continuos ( Hpo:ikiu.i^ of tlio l)r(>iil: in 
 tliu ilum) : " Tho tlisastur was fnlly nnticipilcd l)y rc.i:-.''i: 
 of tlio (lefoctivo ooiistrnctiou uuil lax utteiitlon to iniu'O' 
 (Mi'OH, whic'li ill tlio ^'raiul siiiii avo of the utmost ii..[K;r- 
 (;iiic;c ill works of this kiiul. Tlicio i.s no oxcuso for tills, 
 cxo(>i)t iicgli^'cijcu and wili'nl igiioraiico on tlio part of tljo 
 contractor. " 
 
 Tho Siirvcyor-CIonoral was sent l>v tlio f,'ovcriini(Mit 
 ill Juno Ls7i), for Iho pni'poso of inspcctinj.; tho woik 
 (lono on tho Mat-^qui Dvko. In his oilicial report, datol 
 17th Juno 1871), wo ihul tlio following remarks : 
 
 " Tho line of lovoo as located by Mr. Mahood las 
 boon materially changed, to tho detriinoiit of tho dyko 
 ill future year,;, Trom tho wosfcorii boundary of Lot lis, 
 G. 2, to v.ithiu about half a mile of tlio 'Mission' barn, 
 being placed from 50 to 100 feet nearer tho river bank. 
 In front of ' riiversido ' the lino is now on the exhenio 
 edgo of the river b ink, ami in places, I might say, over 
 the edge. — Troni the yearly inroads tho river is iual;'ng 
 on its banks, I should say that such work could not 
 last. 
 
 "The bcrin, whicli sliould bo 4 feet, is in many 
 places less than ?> feet. The slope of the ditch should be 
 one and a half to one, but I Hud it nearly vortical, and 
 in some places the current of the incoming high watei- 
 
 ^J, .&v^,-?« 
 
»: . ■ 
 
 — 5 — 
 
 in tho ditch lm» undermined tho borm, endangering the 
 Bufoty of tho luvoo. In miiiiy i)hices tho ditches huvo been 
 made too deep, goiii{,' down into sand and bad matcriid 
 for tho construction of tho lovce, contrary to tho hpeuiti- 
 cations. 
 
 "Tho Hood ^'utcs are not constructed in accordance 
 with tlio gcuoral plans, drawing No. 2, as spcciliod, and 
 are not self-acting. The high water prevented me from 
 making a thorough examination of them, sq that I am 
 unable to report as to thoir practicability. I am informed 
 by Mr. Navarre tliat the bottom of tho flood-gates in 
 Slough No. 3 are 11 feet from bottom of slough, or ab- 
 out 8 feet above low water mark. This would, of course, 
 interfere with canoe navigation. 
 
 "The sheet piling is not spiked closely to the caps 
 and girts, but is wedged out to present an even surface 
 for the battens to be .spiked on, and has a slovenly and 
 unworkmanlike appearance. The same remarks apply to 
 sheeting in bulkheads. Some of the sheutiug is not of as 
 good quality as might be desired, being unevenly s iwed 
 and having bad knots, through which I could see water 
 
 bubbling. I would recommend that Mr. Perby 
 
 should be obliged to build the levee at least seveuty (70J 
 feet further from the river bank in the vicinity of 'Rivor- 
 side' than he at preseut contemplates." 
 
— G — 
 
 After these* statcmeuts, comiug from such a soiuoej' 
 \vas it not tlie duty of the Government to force the 
 contractor to stand by the specificatious, and to prevent 
 Iniii from bailainj^' the dyke in such a careless manner 
 iis woukl endanger its sifety ? Everybody shovdd thiniv 
 iio, but the fact is that the remarks made by Mr. Gore 
 uere ]iot attendcil to. No aUei'ation v;as made in the 
 location of the lino of hjvee, as clianged by the contrac- 
 tor; in many places ike dyke is actually bnilt with 
 sand and bad material; the berm is less than 3 feet, 
 and is gi'adaally undermined by the combined action of 
 frost, thaw tuid water, in such a way that wo may expect 
 the embankment to tumble down into the ditch. 
 
 But let us rosumo the exposition of the facts. As early 
 as the 2-lth of May 1S7D, the first break occurred in 
 Slough No. 3 when piles and sheeting were swept away. 
 The contractoi-, seeing this dam giving waj-, and fearing 
 for the safety of the other in Slough Ko. 2, which at the 
 time showed evident signs of weakness, partly removed 
 the sheeting to save it; but it would have been better to 
 have left it as it was in order to tost its efficacy. 
 
 The result v/as that the Mat^qui [)rairio was again 
 under water in the summer of 1879, which caused a 
 great amount of loss and damages to the settlers. 
 
 la the .spring of 1880, the two dauii abov*nneutloa(;d 
 
 (y 
 
— 7 — 
 
 !-.(. 
 
 a 
 
 were put in repair to stand tlio high water pressure of 
 that year; but as soon as the -water began to rise, it was 
 found brealdng through under the dam from the fact of 
 the sheotiug having been driven on to a log in the bottom 
 of the slough. Every stratagem was resorted to in order 
 to stop the flow of water, but all to no purpose. 
 
 In July, same year, a bi'ealc occurred in some bulk- 
 heading at the upper part of the dyke; and about same 
 time, one of the seLtlers discovered what he considered a 
 weak spot in the dam No. 2, drawing to it the Engineer's 
 attention, who, after examining it, said there was not 
 the slightest danger of it giving way, as it was about the 
 strongest part of the whole dyke. And two days after ''/ii^ 
 Engineer rcportinrj it as the strongest part of the dyke, the 
 very place indicated icas washed aivay. 
 
 Consequently, the Matsqui prairie was again over- 
 flowed in the summer of 1880, with the same disastrous 
 effects as before. 
 
 The time for completion of the dyke having now e- 
 lapsed, and observing the defective mnnncr the work had 
 been carried on, the settlers gave the contractor E.L. 
 Derby to understand that they would withdraw their 
 support from an undertaking so carelessly carried on 
 and evidently so badly managed. They also notified t'ne 
 Government to the same effect by a petition signed by 
 
— 8 — 
 
 all the sottlors. The pctitionera were rewarded \vitl» 
 glo.wiiig pro;nises which had no practical or benehci^n 
 result. In the meantime, the work was left at a stanu- 
 stiU. 
 
 The Legislative Assembly met in Victoria in the 
 spring of 1(SS1, r.nd during its sitting, arranged all 
 matleia with the new contractors C. L. Sword and Co. 
 to salt tliem, without consulting tlie settlers in a case 
 ill \\]iich they were so deeply concerned and involved, 
 tlnis ignoring our right of voice in au ali'air in whicli 
 Ave wore the most interested. The first intimation oi' 
 a settlement being made was conveyed to us by the 
 newspapers. 
 
 Immediately, wo forwarded a protest to the Go- 
 vernment, declaring that wo had uo confidence what- 
 ever in tiie Engineer at that time in chai'ge of the 
 work, and finally declining to have anything further 
 to do in the matter, or hold ourselves responsible for 
 work done under the direction of an Engineer, who.^o 
 incapacity for condiictiug the work according to speci- 
 fications or terms of agreement had been so woofnllv 
 established from die time of his undertaking it. 
 
 The Government took no heed of our protest, aiid 
 the work was resumed under the same Engineer » 
 superintendence. 
 
 r':> 
 
 »^f):^mmvjsmi»f.*^--^zmwmm>»^^'^ 
 
■V 
 
 
 
 Ll- 
 
 In the month of Oclober 1881, tL^ newspapeia 
 slated tljtit the dyke Avas completed and a perfect suc- 
 cess; but how could they ascertain such to be the case, 
 Avheii there had been no high water to prove or test it ? 
 
 Now comes that question, is the dyke a success or 
 is it likely to be ? AVe would like very much to answer 
 iu tlio affirra^itive, but we must certainly declare we have 
 no coafideuce whatever in it. From the careless manner 
 in which it has been constructed, we were almost certain 
 that it would give way. We had not long to wait to see 
 the evil effwt of bad management. Scarcely had the 
 Engineer quitted the s:ouo of his labours on the dam 
 he had Just completed in last October on Slough No. 2 
 and pronounced a success, that it was partly washed a- 
 way not by high water on this occasion, but on account 
 of evident carelessness in construction. 
 
 The gate sill in this dam was about five feet above 
 low water, without even an apron to carry the water 
 from the front; very little rain causes a great rush 
 through the gates, and the water having a fall of between 
 four and five feet at the bottom of the gate, washed out 
 the piles that supported the embankment, causing it to 
 cavo into the slough, and thus to be washed away. The 
 mode adopted in constructing the gates had not only the 
 effect of washing away the piles, but also caused 
 
— 10 - 
 
 coiisidiuiible iuconvenienco by cutting oil' tlie only coir- 
 inunication the settlers living back on the prairie, had 
 of reaching the river with th,eir produce. Now it did not 
 require a great amount of engineej,ung tact to avert this 
 ovil, liitd the necessary precan{ious been taken. It could 
 have been prevented in two ways, either by removing 
 tlifi nbstnietiou in the shape of a dam, or by conslrr.o- 
 ting it in accordance with the original specification^ 
 which call for the gates to be put down to low wale- 
 mark. The attention of both contractor and Engineer had 
 been cidled to the fact, but in vain. 
 
 Now we have just reasons to beUeve that the dyke 
 has been pronounced a success in consequence of Mr. 
 J. Hunter's report; but how can we rely on the report 
 of an Engineer who gave us so evident proofs of his 
 incapacity in that kind of work; who declared as the 
 strongest part of the dyke a place which, a short time 
 after, was washed away under a very little amount of 
 pressure; who pronounced finally that the dyko was a suc- 
 cess, when, scarcely was it said to be completed, one of 
 the dams was partly washed away, owing to] bad cons- 
 truction of the flood gate, and that in winter time, when 
 no danger might be apprehended. Moreover, how can 
 we believe a new dyke to be a success, when it has not 
 been proved or tested at least onco by high water ? 
 
- 11 - 
 
 Wo tlo not mean to refuse to pay for the dyko when 
 it will be declared to be a good, and substantial work by 
 competent persons, and whpn it wil^ hn,ve been tested by 
 high -water. But is, it jusfc to, forpQ upon ij^the accrptun- 
 ce of ii dyke after the report of an Engineer whosa inaj- 
 bility or partiality can be proved, and before such a work 
 lias had any chance of being tested by high wator V 
 
 Since there is disagreement between the different 
 paities iuterested, respecting the efficiency of the dyke, 
 what we ask for is to have the matter decided by arbi- 
 tration, in the manner described in the clause 1th of 
 ' ^uiuns Dyking Act.' Let the contractor appoint an ar- 
 bitrator, the owners of the land another, and such arbi- 
 trators appoint a third one, and should the decision of 
 the arbitrators be unsatisfactory to any of the two parties, 
 it would be subject to be set aside on application to the 
 Supreme Court of British Columbia. 
 
 We sincerely hope that the Legislative Assembly 
 will not refuse us a request so just and so moderate. 
 Our sanguine opinion is that the Matsqui prairie may be 
 reclaimed, and we are very anxious to have our lands 
 ivell and effectually reclaimed, as the Dyking Act requires 
 it. We feel confident that, should the remarks made by 
 Mr. Navarre and Mr. Gore have been attended to, the' 
 Matsqui dyke would havo proved to be satisfactory to all 
 
:e>A> , 
 
 ^ 12 - 
 
 persons interested in tlio success of u Tsork ol ^ucln 
 •jTidoabtcd utility for the future of thia rruvinco. 
 
 \M CARION. 
 E.M. HORRIS. 
 F.M. JAYOL. 
 Albert HAWKINS. 
 :M. NICHOLSON. 
 
 ch. Mcdonough. 
 
 Arthur SMITH. 
 
 ^•- Tirjc aud difficulty of mail communication did 
 :ot permit us to wait for the signatures of the •>tliGr 
 ]c.r-d- owners. 
 
 Mal^qtU, February 1882. 
 
 • 9i»i 
 
 ^? 
 
]n 
 
 lid'