Ki mm mm E 93 . 14 3 2nd ser no. 58 J-nd/ctt) «* [No. 58— Second Series— 3000.] Indian Rights Association, 1305 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pa., October, 1901. THE PRESSING NEEDS OF THE WARNER RANCH AND OTHER MISSION INDIANS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. An Appeal for Prompt Congressional Action. It was a keen disappointment to the friends of the Indian when apprised last May of the adverse decision by the Federal Supreme Court in the cases of Allejandra Barker and Jesus Quevas vs. J. Downey Harvey, Administrator. These suits involved the rights of certain of the Mission Indians located upon Warner’s Ranch, in the southern portion of the State of California. The Indians concerned had lived upon the lands embraced within the decision of the Court for many genera¬ tions. In the year 1848, by the terms of the treaty of Gaudaloupe Hidalgo, the sovereignty over these lands was transferred by Mexico to the United States. About three years after the treaty between the United States and Mexico was first negoti¬ ated, Congress, on March 3, 1851, passed a bill entitled “An act to ascertain and settle the private land claims in the State of California,” which created a commission to receive- testi¬ mony relative to and determine the validity of all claims made under the terms of the said act. Section eight of the act reads as follows : “ That each and every person claiming lands in California by virtue of any right or title derived from the Spanish or Mexican Government shall present the same to the said commissioners when sitting as a board,,together with such documentary evi¬ dence and testimony of witnesses as the said claimant relies upon in support of such claims; and it shall be the duty of the com- 1 ■ . qs TIL 3 ** -J— RodlSe,r. no. 5 $ 2 missioners, when the case is ready for hearing, to proceed promptly to examine the same upon such evidence, and upon the evidence produced in behalf of the United States, and to decide upon the validity of the said claim, and within thirty days after such decision is rendered to certify the same, with the reasons on which it is founded, to the district attorney of the United States in and for the district in which such decision shall be rendered.” Section thirteen of the act provides further: “That all lands, the claims to which have been finally rejected by the commissioners in the manner herein provided, or which shall be finally decided to be invalid by the District or Supreme Court, and all lands the claims to which shall not have been presented to the said commissioners within two years after the date of this act, shall be deemed, held and considered as part of the public domain of the United States.” The Indians, having no knowledge of the legal requirements under the statute, neglected to notify the commissioners author¬ ized by the act of Congress of their claims. This result was but a natural conclusion of the matter, since the Mexican government had not disturbed them in their holdings; and then, as now, they took little thought for the morrow, being content in their simple domestic life. Section 16, however, requires the commissioners “to ascertain and report to the Secretary of the Interior the tenure by which the Mission lands are held, and those held by civilized Indians and those who are engaged in agriculture or labor of any kind, and also those which are occupied and cultivated by Pueblos or Ranchero Indians.” So far as the opinion of the Supreme Court shows, this commission did not report on the Indian title; or if it did, Congress took no action thereon. The sub¬ stance of the Supreme Court’s decision appears to be, first, that this commission and Congress must be presumed to have per¬ formed their duty, and that as Congress took no action it is fairly to be deduced that the Indians had no claims; and, second, apart from this presumption, that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding that as a matter of fact the Indians had abandoned their land before the cession by the Mexican government, and the only right, if any, was in the San Diego Mission. Whether this would have been found, as a matter of fact, to be the case, had the commission when appointed investigated the claims of these Indians, may perhaps be questioned. But it was certainly the duty of the commission to ascertain and report on their standing. If they had rights, Congress should have ascertained them. If they had abandoned their rights, Congress should have provided them with other lands, instead of permitting them to remain on and to improve those to which they had no title, and from which eventually they were to be ousted. The Indians directly affected by the decree of the Court number over three hundred persons. They were enabled to procure a comfortable living from the revenue derived from the use of the Hot Springs, while others located adjoining the Ranch had a small acreage of valuable farm-lands under irrigation. All this will be lost to them through the decision of the Court. A large portion of the Warner’s Ranch is suitable for grazing only, but it has not recently been in possession of the Indians. In addition to the bands of Mission Indians directly affected by the decision of the Court, there are many others without pro¬ ductive lands. The Manzanita band number sixty people. The 640 acres reserved for their use is for the most part mountainous. From a careful estimate upon the spot, the writer believes that not over eight acres of the 640 are tillable, and at that only second-rate farming land. It is stated that during the summer of 1900 the crop consisted of one sack of beans. The frosts which appear late in the spring and early in the autumn render the raising of vegetables uncertain. The La Posta band of thirteen persons have about three- fourths of a section of land reserved for their use, only eight acres of which are at all tillable. The lands of both the Man¬ zanita and La Posta not now farmed by the Indians consist ot rocky formations and mountains, upon which but little vegeta¬ tion grows, and no pasturage is afforded for stock. At least two or three small bands in addition to those named are in a like condition. The Temecula Indians have an altogether worth¬ less reservation. 4 The white population surrounding these Indians in the southern portion of California have accumulated but little property, although they have secured the best lands wherever they have settled. Being poor themselves, the white neighbors cannot offer steady employment to the Indians, and in many cases it is necessary for them to travel fifty miles or more before work can be obtained. From what can be learned of the situation, the Indians are willing to labor when the opportunity to do so is afforded. Their neighbors even wonder how the Indians live upon so little. The different berries in season, with nutritious barks and the little raised on the lands, tide them over from one season to another, but it is not surprising to find extreme poverty. This condition is accounted for by the former United States Indian Agent for the Mission Tule River Agency, Fran¬ cisco Estudillo, who, in his report to the Indian Office for the year 1896, states that “the lands of the reservations for the Lagunas, Campos, the La Posta, Inaja, and Manzanita reserva¬ tions are all mislocated ; that is, the descriptions of theTeserva- tions call for lands upon which the Indians do not, never did, and will never be able to live for want of water, etc. Their homes have in some instances been located by whites, and eviction must soon follow.” There are over six hundred persons among the different bands of Mission Indians absolutely without lands that will afford a living to any one, even though skilled in farming. Many addi¬ tional families are also included in reservations where, under present conditions, destitution must follow, on account of the fertile lands being so limited in extent. While special atten¬ tion has been called to the extremities of those located within Warner’s Ranch, the needs of the other bands enumerated are equally pressing. It is primarily the duty of the Government to provide lands for these destitute people, who were the first appropriators of the valleys of southern California. Twenty acres of irrigable land to each family would at least place them in a comfortable condition. There is urgent need of surveys to more accurately define the boundaries of several of the reservations. The Indians within the Volcan reserve claim that three or more surveys by the 5 State have been made for the Santa Ysabel Ranch, and in each instance the boundary-line of the Ranch has been extended to include additional land of the fertile valley, thought formerly to be a part of the Volcan reserve. The same need applies to Manzanita, where much of the small valley appropriated by the whites is thought to properly be within the limits of the Indian lands. The re-survey of these reservations should be made by a disinterested corps of employees under the direction of the Government, wholly independent of State control. While frequently we find individual cases of hardship resulting from the segregation of Indian lands into separate holdings, no backward step should be taken with the Mission Indians in this connection. Under the allotment system there is the incentive to individual effort and ownership in personal property, so much needed during the twenty-five year trust period in which the Government holds the title to the land. The custom so universal among Indians of giving and living upon the product of the frugal members of the tribe is detrimental to progress. While among this simple and generous people the greatest is he who gives all for his fellows, among the more grasping Anglo-Saxons the rule is generally reversed, and riches seem to bring distinction. If a home is provided for each family, with the guarantee that it shall be theirs, a strong induce¬ ment to labor is fostered that is otherwise lacking, especially by Indians who have been victimized by false promises made to them. The exigencies in the case call for immediate action on the part of the Department of the Interior, so that definite official knowledge be secured regarding the needs of the Mission Indians, together with the character and value of lands available for purchase. To this end we urge that a committee of three be directed to investigate and report to. the Secretary of the Interior before the convening of the coming session of Congress, so that legislation in the interest of the Indians concerned may not longer be delayed. All friends of the Indian are urged without delay to address the member of Congress from their respective districts, appeal¬ ing for legislation in behalf of this needy people. For the con- 6 venience of those who are willing to act in this matter we suggest the following form of petition, for use as indicated : ‘ ‘ To the Hoiiorable - : “ The peaceable possession by the Mission Indians of the fertile lands of southern California previous to and following our national acquisition thereof, from which, in many instances, they have been or are about to be evicted, under circumstances which, as we believe, work a practical injustice, entitles these Indians to a sufficient acreage upon which they can earn a liveli¬ hood. A typical instance of apparent injustice under our laws is found in the proposed eviction of the Indians from the Warner’s Ranch, or Agua Caliente, where they have lived for many generations. “We respectfully petition for such legislation by the Con¬ gress of the United States as will provide lands upon which all the Mission Indians located in California can earn a livelihood, and request that you will use your influence in securing the proper legislation and Executive action to accomplish this result.”