i 'i 1 * 1 ' ' ] f ‘^i~JZjOy^ li/. “ With the attainment of comparative tranquillity, com- merce was revived. But the discovery of a new world — of two new worlds, the Eastern and the Western Indies — communicated to it a character, which in our days it has almost entirely lost. Instead of being the low, mechanical operation of modern times, it had in it something generous and romantic. The merchant was a voyager into unex- plored, or at least unfamiliar seas. In a little hark, he ventured to encounter the yet unfamiliar perils of oceans but lately traversed, and of an extent, to which the seas of old, known to commercial enterprise, were hut as lakes ; week after week, at a distance from land which would have amazed and affrighted his predecessors, and which in FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 39 him required an heroic, undaunted disposition. But he did not encounter these perils for nothing. No ; a hope as mighty as the sense of danger stirred within him. At the ends of the earth, he trusted, at the expense of still- continuing hazard and enterprise, to found empires, to reap the rich harvest of unexplored gold mines, to store his vessel with the jewels of the east and of the west, with spices, with frankincense, with myrrh. The largeness of the profits arising from the sudden expansion of the fields of commercial enterprise was not without its effect. The rapid accumulation of wealth, by chance, in ease and tran- quillity, by the turn of a die, by plunder, by the fortune of war, or by any other accident, which may never return again, too often communicates to the character a fixed, inveterate avarice ; but the merchants of those days, ac- quiring as they did immense wealth, by regular industry joined with heroic enterprise, in a field apparently bound- less, felt within themselves a true nobility of soul. They were not huckstering anxiously after the last and ex- tremest farthing. As their wealth poured in, not indeed without difficulty, but yet with profuseness, they insensibly acquired a character of generosity. They were princes of the earth, not merely in their riches, but in real princely magnanimity. Daily exploring new wonders in the deep and on the land, they became, not narrow petty formalists, but men of large and capacious understanding. Exposed in the infancy of navigation to personal perils almost unknown in our times, they imbibed a certain profound spiritual assurance, that their lives, their wealth, and all that they had, were in the hand of that Almighty Euler, 40 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. who, as he had freely given, might also, if his will were so, at one stroke take them all away. They that go down to the sea in ships, that do business in great waters, these see the worTcs of the Lord, and his wonders in the deep. Even the miser of that day was something of a poet ; not filling his belly with the windy abstractions of consols, or exchequer bills, or railway shares, or scrip of this denomination or that, s but feeding fat his soul, in gloating over solid bars of silver and of gold, over ingots, over diamonds of untold price, over rich heaps of substantial and glittering treasure. “ But, while the discovery of new worlds of sense and worldly wealth communicated this impulse to the men of commerce, the invention of printing opened up a new spiritual world, of equally boundless and inexhaustible riches, which communicated an impulse of a far deeper, wider, and more permanent character. Let us imagine, in the present day, a man, whose mind, cultivated up to a certain point, has been fitted for the quick reception of the truths and modes of thinking, developed in the writings of some great mind, with which he has been hitherto unacquainted. When these writings are for the first time brought under his notice, what a change is sud- denly produced in him ! What a new world of thought has been all at once revealed within him ! With what zeal does he give himself up to the study of this, to him, new sage ! How all his faculties are quickened and set in motion ! What a complete revolution, for a time ! — The new subject haunts his mind by day ; in the night season, it troubles his dreams. All that he has before known or believed must henceforth be submitted to a new investi- FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 41 gation. All his actions must be tried by a new standard. He carries into the minutest concerns of life a heart and mind changed. In a certain sense, the whole world has become new to him. How dear to him are the words, the phrases — for a time, even the affectations — of this new friend. While the novelty lasts, he thinks, almost writes, and, if the world around sympathized with his enthu- siasm, he would speak, in the dialect of this new revela- tion. Standing as he does alone, and without sympathy, his conversation, for a little while, is a mere translation into the world’s tongue of what he has just read in most unworldly language. His topics, his illustrations, his dis- tinctions, all the weapons of his discursive warfare, are selected from that armoury — for a time. Tliis is what actually takes place now, in this unenthusiastic age, more than once in the lives of all men of any pretension to mental cultivation. And how would it be with him, if, instead of his enthusiasm being checked by the coldness and in- difference of all around him, he found himself encom- passed on every side by men in the same mental condition, catching the fierce contagion from him, and imparting it to him ? If, instead of his enthusiasm being based on the writings of some one mind, of perhaps very limited reach of thought, it was kindled, not alone by all the master- pieces of human imagination, wit, reason, and eloquence, but by even a more universal acquaintance than before with the transcendent revelations of Divine Wisdom, appealing at once to his profoundest sensibilities, and quickening all the noblest faculties of his mind ? We have in our own day witnessed a faint image of such a 42 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. spiritual conflagration, produced by tbe morbid imagina- tion and superficial thought of a Byron, of a singer chanting without authority, and coming before the world with no prejudice in his favour. Yet this ecstacy lasted for years, spread wide enough, and indeed to very distant corners of the globe. What would have taken place, if (as in the days of the revival of learning) the inspiration had fallen upon a nation, not sunk in sloth and scepticism, but of great inward heroism and outward activity, of reverence incomparably deeper, and spiritual character incomparably more healthy, having not merely the faculty to receive, but the true creative energy to appropriate and reconstruct — if it had fallen upon such a people, and had proceeded from all the master-minds of Greece, of Eome, of modern Italy, and in part too from those yet more awful Hebrew sages, through whose hps the streams of the wisdom of the Almighty flowed yet nearer to their Divine and Everlasting Fountain — from books, which, with all the freshness of novelty, spoke not the unau- thorized and doubtful words of modern innovation, but had upon them the crust of antique revereuce, and breathed the language of time-honoured and undoubted wisdom ! — From causes such as these, which in the age of Elizabeth attained their fullest developement, proceeded consequences of the highest importance. Such circum- stances, of themselves, constituted an education without the aid of schools. * * * * * “ And when we look at the fruits of that education, at the men of that age, we discern at once how universal. FREDEEICK LUCAS. 43 how many-sided it really was. Wherever we turn our eyes, whatever class of society appears distinctly before us in the records of that time, we cannot hut recognize on the whole a superiority over our own age ; a superiority, not of knowledge, hut of character. No man of any eminence was in those days content to excel narrowly in any one pursuit. With a generous eagerness after excel- lence, each man strove to cultivate his whole mind. The speculative and active powers were not, as in the present age, divorced, hut cultivated in harmonious unison. Eeason was not developed to the exclusion of the Imagina- tion, nor Imagination to the exclusion of the Eeason ; indi- vidual peculiarity was not sacrificed, hut was found con- sistent with a strict and awful reverence, not only for civil and ecclesiastical authority, hut for all forms of excellence. The influence of the Church was indeed diminished, though it was stiU great, hut, to compensate for tliis loss, the Bible was studied more than ever, and from its pages men did not at first learn wholly to expunge this lesson : Let every soul he subject to the Higher Powers. If we leave out of our consideration men of the highest intellectual rank, Shakspeare and Bacon, and confine our attention to minds of inferior order, how gigantic does their cultivation seem ! — Sir Philip Sidney, the warrior, the statesman, the courtier, the poet, the romance-writer ! — Sir Walter Ealeigh, of a yet wider range of mind — at once poet, orator, soldier, sailor, discoverer, planter of colonies, historian, man of science, courtier, and states- man ! — ^Even Coke, the pedant, had in him something gigantic, a force of character which has brought him down 44 FEEDERICK LUCAS. the stream of time in regal state, and has preserved for him, even to the present moment, the devout homage of the weak and puny pedants who have succeeded him. And when these Elizabethan days of triumphant mental developement passed away, when the circle of excellence became in the course of time narrowed, when that source of inspiration, which addressed itself to the widest circle and appealed to the deepest feelings (the Bible) out- lasted and triumphed over the others — when the rod of Moses swallowed up the rods of all the other enchanters — when, in place of an age of universal developement, there came an age, in which religion was made, not in- clusive of all other and lesser excellence, but exclusive and narrow — when the great deep of English society was broken up, so as to display the riches which it before concealed in its bosom — then, in the midst of civil conflict, was seen what strength, what health, what energy, what varied excellence, what unheard-of vitality, had pene- trated down to the very commonalty of this mighty people ! ” I could multiply these characteristic extracts, but enough has been given, to show the direction the mind of the lecturer was then taking. He was look- ing back with intense interest to the past, and, if he still saw much to admire in the Age of the Eeformation, it was clear, that he traced the origin of all its merits to a yet earlier period, and was already inclined to bestow his warmest sympathies FEEDEETCK LUCAS. 45 on the Feudal and Catholic spirit of mediseval Chris- tendom. But now came an interval of painful uncertainty. Every day led him further from Quakerism, and nearer to the historical Christianity of the ages in which he took so deep an interest, hut he still retained some of his old Protestant feelings with regard to the Church of Eome. He doubted her claim to infallibility, for he still believed her in many things corrupt. Her antique forms, her solemn services, her venerable traditions, had a great charm for him; he longed for communion with the good and pious men of distant countries and bygone generations, and for those sweet and awful memories which unite the living with the dead in a chain of unbroken association ; but he shrank from at once condemning all the convictions of his previous life, and he hesitated to accept an authority, from which there could be no appeal. The natural solution of these difficulties seemed to lie in the Church of England, and some of his friends entertained the hope, that he would yet find rest within her walls. Here, they argued, was a Church, which laid no claim to infallibility, but which possessed the authority of old reverence and 46 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. long prescription — whicli liad never broken with the historic past, but had studied to maintain what- ever of ancient usage was compatible with scrip- tural truth — which, seeking to reform, and not de- stroy, had preserved the most beautiful and touching services of former times, only made clearer and more intelligible to the people — which was identified, not only with that Elizabethan age, of which Lucas himself had proclaimed the genius and the glory, but with much that was noble and honourable in our subsequent annals — which, for three centuries, had satisfied the conscience, and commanded the allegiance, of many of the most illustrious of English minds — which, without sacrificing what she held to be essential, was yet so comprehensive in her charity, that she gave more latitude to opinion than any other Church in existence — and which, while ab- staining from the restless and meddling activity of the Eomish clergy, still exercised a wide-spread and often salutary influence, on the education, the literature, the habits, and the character of English- men. A Church embalmed in our poetry, and bound up with much of the story of our daily life. A Church, at once Catholic in feeling, and Protestant in the free spirit of rational enquiry — sometimes FREDEEICK LUCAS. 47 called Arminian, and sometimes Calvinistic, but really including both Calvinists and Arminians in her pale — and, not wishing to be more precise or dogmatical than Evangelists and Apostles, content to leave many questions unsettled, and many points dubious, so that she could preach the great truths of the Gospel in their simplest and broadest sense. To all this Lucas responded somewhat coldly. The early prejudice against an established religion, which he shared with most English Dissenters, had been modified or removed by his subsequent studies and reflections, and he was certainly not insensible to the high and rare qualities of many of the Church of England divines. Of his obligations to Bishops Berkeley and Butler I have already spoken, and I have often heard him expatiate on the various merits of Hooker, and South, and Barrow, and ex- press an almost affectionate admiration for Jeremy Taylor. But he seemed to be repelled rather than attracted by the Church of his own day. It must be confessed, that she does not always present herself to a stranger in the most pleasing form. That noble Liturgy, which can never lose its beauty and signifi- cance for those who have been bred up in the use of it, must in a great measure be deprived of its effect, 48 FEEDERICK LUCAS. when heard read for the first time, in a droning, a flippant, an affected, or an irreverent tone ; and no amount of respect for the pulpit of South and Taylor, however deep and sincere, can reconcile a neophyte to the chilling manner, the wearisome repetitions, the heavy and oppressive somnolency of many a modern sermon. But, apart from these outward considera- tions, there was no doubt something in the mind and character of Lucas directly opposed to that, which has been sometimes deemed the weakness of the Church of England, hut which her best friends have always considered her chief strength and glory — namely, her singular moderation, and wise spirit of compromise. Now to all compromise Lucas was by nature adverse, for it seemed to him a cowardly abandonment of truth for the sake of expediency. He forgot in his impatient ardour, that absolute truth can only be attained by perfect intelligences, and that such relative truth as we possess in this world is often found in the balancing of apparent contra- dictions, in limitations, in concessions, and in the careful avoidance of extremes. It is vain to say, that this may be very well in worldly matters, but does not apply to the revelations of Divine Wisdom ; for the fact is, that those revelations must be comprehended « FEEDEKICK LUCAS. 49 and explained by human reason, before they can have any practical result: and we know positively that they are differently understood by different minds. But what Lucas wanted was something com- plete, definite, unconditional ; and, if he had entered the Church of England at all, he would certainly not have rested on any neutral ground, but would have at once attached himself to one of her extreme parties. The low church or evangelical party could hardly, under any circumstances, have been the one of his choice. He could fully sympathize indeed with the lofty and unselfish enthusiasm, which had abolished the slave-trade, and found a vent in missionary enter- prise ; but he had a strong dislike to the narrow and puritanical spirit, which was often so unpleasingly contrasted with it, and which appeared to him more offensively present in this section of the Church, than even amongst the Dissenters with whom he had passed his youth. Then, too, the views of the evan- gelicals differed altogether from that estimate of the value of ecclesiastical history and tradition, which he had derived from his late studies, and which was so congenial to his own taste and feelings. He accused them moreover of giving undue prominence to the E 50 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. minister, and, strange as it may sound to many, of attaching too much importance to mere human teach- ing. “ Look there,” he would say, as he entered some church, in which the pulpit was placed with its back to the altar; “there is an epitome of the whole matter. The minister and the congregation face to face, chiefly occupied with each other’s notions. Preaching preferred to prayer, the pulpit to the altar, man to God ! ” And, in that preaching, if one thing more than another tended to alienate and repel him (and herein is a lesson, which all Protestants would do well to lay to heart), it was the gross unfairness of those unmeasured and intemperate attacks, in which hostility to the Church of Eome outsteps the limits of charity and common sense. It cannot be too often repeated, that the bitter and violent language, which, in the early Eeformers, was the natural and excusable exaggeration of men struggling for life, and for all that is dearer than life, is wholly unsuitable and intolerable in the members of a safe, settled, and prosperous communion, and can only serve to degrade and injure the cause they wish to promote. It pro- duced in Lucas a feelmg of intense disgust, and many besides Lucas can testify to the same effect. The old high church party, on the other hand, with FEEDEKICK LUCAS. 51 its learning and sober dignity, bad less to offend bis taste, or excite bis opposition ; but be never could reconcile bimself to wbat be considered its coldness, stiffness, and exclusiveness. He looked on tbe bigb cburcb parsons as fine, old English gentlemen, “a branch of tbe aristocracy,” but knew not bow to include them in his definition of a priest. He acknowledged their private virtues, but accused them of a merely formal execution of their office, of indif- ference in matters of theology, and of a general stagnation in religious ideas. He said, that the most distinguished amongst them were rather scholars than divines, and that they seemed to prefer learning even to piety. Had he been acquainted with some of their number — Archdeacon Watson, for instance, or the late Mr. Horris, of Hackney — he might perhaps have modified these opinions, unless he had regarded those excellent clergymen as exceptions proving the rule. I have already explained the repugnance, which Lucas would have felt, to sit down quietly with that great body of Englishmen, who, calling themselves neither high nor low, are content to give a vague and general assent to the doctrines and discipline of the Church, and, without entering on any disputed E 2 52 FREDERICK LUCAS. questions, to pray as their fathers prayed, in the old buildings with the old forms, satisfied that the real essence of Christianity lies in the heart and life of its votaries, and that all outward observances are merely means to an end, but quite willing to pay due defer- ence to ancient custom and established authority. He would have charged these persons, although he might have found amongst them some of the best and wisest of his countrymen, with a cowardly and disin- genuous neutrality, and have compared them, in his half serious, half jesting way, to those doomed spirits in Dante, who, being neither good nor bad, neither black nor white, neither hot nor cold, neither one thing nor the other, are passed by with the silence of contempt. Of course, this would have been the mere extravagance of phrase, in which he sometimes de- lighted ; but he really had a strong antipathy to the middle course in such matters, and looked upon it as not far removed from dishonesty. Afew years later, and he would have learned, that, in the bosom of this hroad church party, there were men with views as definite, and hopes as high, and courage as dauntless, as in any other section of the religious world. Even then, he must have known something of that moral magic, by which Arnold had breathed a new life into the FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 53 schools of England. But he could not foresee what earnest and devout champions were soon to range themselves under the banners of Mr. Maurice and his friends ; and the day had not yet come, when, in a chapel at Brighton, he might have heard from the lips of Frederick Eobertson (too -Ettle appreciated, and, alas ! too early lost) the thoughts of a mind as bold and original as Luther’s, expressed in language as chaste and eloquent as Bossuet’s. To this side of the religious movement of his time Lucas was com- paratively a stranger, and he held the moderate Churchmen to be mere trimmers and temporizers, when a more intimate knowledge might perhaps have taught him, that, in religion as in politics, depth and largeness of view (far oftener than shallowness or timidity) may lead men to stand aloof from extreme counsels, and to bear the hostility and reproach of opposite factions, rather than sacrifice their own convictions to the prejudices or passions of either. There was, however, one party in the Church of England, towards which Lucas was drawn by power- ful sympathies. That new Oxford school, which, popularly known by the nickname of Puseyite or Tractariariy was beginning to excite universal atten- tion, had much in common with himself. It con- 54 FKEDEEICK LUCAS. sisted of men, who, like him, could find no rest in the present, and were strongly impelled to take refuge in the poetry and traditions of the past. Like him, they were dissatisfied with what they termed the evasions and compromises of all around them, and steadily pursued the ideal of a Visible Church, pure, perfect, and invested with supreme authority, that should speak in clear and unmistakeable tones to all her children, and put an end to the schisms and heresies of the Christian world. Such an ideal they could not find in the avowedly imperfect, but practical and temperate Church of their own age and country, and they therefore sought to bring her back to what they considered the Catholic idea of unity, and to restore to her the prerogatives, of which they believed she had been unjustly deprived. Unwilling to separate from the communion, in which they and their fathers had been reared and nourished, sincerely attached to the Anglican worship as a whole, and still regarding Popery as in some respects corrupt, they fondly hoped, that, by a stricter observance of the rubrics, by a return to many of the practices of ancient days, and by a diligent study of the Fathers and Doctors of the Universal Church, they might inspire their own branch of it with a true Catholic FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 55 spirit. Many of them would no doubt have said with the poet : — Oh ! gather whencesoe’er ye safely may The help which slackening Piety requires ; Nor deem that he perforce must go astray Who treads upon the footmarks of his sires ! And, whatever unseemly or ludicrous incidents may have afterwards been associated with this movement — as when a great controversy degenerated into a miserable squabble about surplices, and flowers, and candles lighted or not lighted — no candid person will deny to its authors the praise of honest and earnest devotion. Nor were they deficient in learning and ability, to aid the efforts of their zeal, and in John Henry Newman they possessed one man at least of rare and exceptional talents. It was natural, it was inevitable, that Lucas should feel deeply interested in the fortunes of this party — that he should watch all their proceedings with the closest attention, and devour their writings with avidity. He constantly found points of resemblance between their views and his own, but there was one point of difference between himself and them, which it is most important to remember. They had been trained up in the lap of the Church of England, they 56 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. still lingered in the shadow of her venerable univer- sity, and, in spite of all changes of opinion, they were bound to her by the early ties of memory and affection. Lucas, on the contrary, had been nurtured in direct hostility to her claims as a national religion, had no early recollections to predispose him in her favour, and could approach the question as to how far she was identified with the Church of the Middle Ages, in a spirit of impartial indifference on her account. It was this, perhaps, which enabled him to see, sooner and more clearly than the Oxford divines, whither they were insensibly drifting. Accepting their premises, and believing their idea of a Church to be the true one, he failed to arrive at the conclu- sion, that this idea could ever be realized in the Church of England. Whatever she had retained of stately forms and ancient usages, whatever of Ca- tholic sentiment she had derived from the past, what- ever deference she might pay to the authority of Councils and Fathers — he could not help feehng, that she was, in her nature, essentially Protestant, and that, from the moment she had separated from Pome, she had really based her title to respect and alle- giance, not on any power inherent in her own con- stitution, but on a sound, and reasonable, and honest FEEDEKICK LUCAS. 57 interpretation of Scripture, and a faithful adherence to the broad principles of the Christian faith. But this, Lucas would argue, involved an appeal to the right of private judgment, as distinctly as the un- authorized preaching of any obscure sect, and in no way came up to that grand idea of a Church, gifted with divine graces, and armed with supernatural powers. The true Protestant, who was willing to work out painfully his own salvation, by the light of Scripture, and the guidance of God’s Spirit, with such little help as he might get from men wiser or better than himself, but with no thought, that he could ever shift the responsibility for a moment from his own shoulders, might be content with a Church, that could only afford him advice, assistance, and consolation. But for those, who required a Visible Presence, which, reflecting the glory, and endowed with the perfections of the Unseen, should encompass their whole life from the cradle to the grave, and, never leaving them to their own choice or discretion, should solve every doubt, fix every opinion, direct their thoughts, regulate their actions, examine their consciences, bind or loose their sins, the Church of England offered no permanent resting-place. And so it happened, that the teaching of that Anglican 58 FEEDERICK LUCAS. school, with which he had the most sjonpathy, led Lucas, as it has many others, not in the direction of Anglicanism, hut on the high road to Eome. There, he contended, and there only, was the Church of the Middle Ages, unaltered and unalterable ; and, if that Church were indeed identical with Christianity itself, and not a mere earthly garment, in which the hea- venly Truth had clothed herself for a temporary purpose, he could not doubt, that his duty was to seek her where she was to be found in her full pro- portions, and not to accept any imitation or shadow as a substitute for the great original The year 1839 opened upon these doubts and struggles, but they did not continue long. It was one of the characteristics of Lucas, to pursue a train of thought with incredible rapidity, and arrive at a conclusion with startling promptitude. His friends had indeed noticed the direction which all his specu- lations had of late been taking ; but they were not' prepared for the sudden avowal, that he had made up his mind, that all hesitation was at an end, and that he had determined to become a Eoman Catholic. They were at first struck dumb by the intelligence, but, when they recovered from the surprise, they did what was most natural under the circumstances. FREDERICK LUCAS. 59 They implored him to pause, before takiug an irre- vocable step. They argued, that he had not had sufficient time for a full and fair investigation of so important a matter, and they entreated him to let a year or two elapse, during which he might continue his studies, and consult the best authorities on all sides of the question, before openly declaring himself. But to all this he answered, that Catholicism was true, and that he dared not palter with the truth. It was not an opinion, which he held about it, but a faith, which had possession of his soul, and by which he must live and die. To deny it before the world would be like Peter denying his Saviour, and, what- ever might be the consequences, he would pubKsh his convictions, then, there, at once, and to every body, and lose not a moment in joining the Catholic Church. It was in vain to plead or remonstrate, and his best friends could only lament his precipitation, while they honoured his fearless integrity. Por it must not be supposed, that such a step could be taken without considerable sacrifices. A change of this kind almost always involves the loosening of many ties, or, at all events, gives rise to harsh judgments, and is attended with painful feelings. In the case of Lucas, it was opposed to 60 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. the strongest sentiments of the body, to which he had hitherto belonged ; and, far worse than this, he knew it must be distasteful to a father, whom he loved and reverenced, and to all the members of a family, for whom he entertained the warmest affec- tion. Moreover, he was deeply attached to a lady, whom he had engaged to marry, and who, like him, was a member of the Society of Friends, and he could not but own, that the happiness of both of them might be seriously endangered by his present course. As it happened, she was convinced by his arguments or his example, and soon after adopted his new opinions, and, at a later period, two of his brothers followed him into the Eomish Church. But when he first took the resolution, which was the turning-point of his life, he stood absolutely alone, and he acted irrespectively of every consideration but a sense of imperious duty. It is the fashion to assume, that such conversions are necessarily brought about by persuasion, by personal influence, by the intrigues of Jesuits, or by some other occult machinery. It is difficult for Protestants to believe, that any man, reared in the spirit of the nineteenth century, should choose of his own accord to go back some hundreds of years. FREDERICK LUCAS. 61 Yet, with Lucas, there can be no doubt, that the change was entirely the work of his own mind. He was not acquainted at the time with more than one or two Eoman Catholics, and had read scarcely any of their later productions, with the exception, perhaps, of Milner’s End of Controversy, and the Bishop of Strasburg’s Amicahle Discussion. His studies had been chiefly conflned to the older books, and, like the Oxford divines, he had sought to evolve the idea of a Church, from the records of primitive Christianity, and the history of the Middle Ages. If he found this idea realized nowhere but in Eome, it was the spontaneous and unbiassed result of his individual meditations, and was certainly not produced by any external pressure. And hardly had he become a member of the Eomish Church, when, with his usual enthusiasm, he determined to communicate his views to others, and proceeded to publish a pamphlet, entitled Reasons for hecoming a Roman Catholic, addressed to the Society of Friends. In this remarkable tract, he made great use of the argument founded on analogy; and, as Bishop Butler had shown, that many of the popular objections to revelation apply equally to natural religion, so he endeavoured 62 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. to prove, that the charges most frequently brought against Catholicism might be urged with the same justice against any form of Protestantism. With regard to the accusation, for instance, that Catholic images and paintings have a tendency to sensualize the mind, he wrote as follows : — “Do not men of all creeds surround themselves on every side with fair and noble objects? Does not the citizen leave his daily toil, and the busy hum of the streets, to solace himself every evening and every morning, though it were with but a glimpse of the work of the Almighty ? Does he not fly as from a pestilence from the works of man, to solace himself with the works of God ? What line of poetry more frequent in the mouth of a Friend, than that line of Cowper : God made the country, and man made the town ! “ Does he not, in his mansion, or villa, or cottage in the country, surround himself with flowers and trees, and evergreen shrubs, that speak of an eternal summer, and lawns and waterfalls, and whatever else of the same kind his means enable him to collect around him? Nay, even if his worldly occupations do not allow him to leave the town, does not he keep at his smoky and dingy window some pot of sweet smelling mignonette, some geranium, or some root of hyacinth over his mantel- piece? Amd when the summer is drawing to a close, and the trees are beginning to clothe themselves in their autumnal tints, does he not choose out some sequestered FEEDERICK LUCAS. 63 spot, in which, before the arrival of desolate winter, he may refresh himself in intercourse with the restormg powers of nature ? And why does he so ? Is it for pleasure, for amusement, to enjoy himself, to scrape together as much of the transitory delights of this world as lie within his reach 1 Is he a sensual epicurean, and does he look upon it that pleasure is the ultimate good, and that God has sent Christ to suffer death for his redemption, and taught him the religion of the cross, and then, forsooth, has laid deep the foundations of this magnificent earth, only to minister to his pleasure ? — Oh, no ! the Friend, who uses nature as we have described, is no such pagan. He knows well, that the true use of every pleasure is to lead us to God. That the beauty and the glory of the outward creation are lawfully to be used and enjoyed by us, because they are symbols of the power, the wisdom, and the goodness of Him who has created both them and us. He knows, that the smallest leaf, or root, or flower, or mineral, speaks volumes of the God who has created them. And for this purpose it is, that he surrounds himself at all events with some of God’s workmanship, to cheer and console him amid the trivialities of human existence. To what purpose does he attend lectures on astronomy, and delight himself in orreries, and read treatises on natural theology, and study the exquisite anatomy of the hand, but because he knows well, that this outward world has been contrived so cunningly, and dressed up in such heavenly beauty, not to minister to his pleasure, but to preach to him of the God who made him ? 64 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. “Truly, if we would be consistent, let us burn our meeting-houses, and the pious stories for our children, and the pictures in their books, our Bridgewater treatises, and Paley’s Natural Theology — nay, let us devastate the face of the earth itself, and make creation a blank, if we will allow no outward object to suggest an inward aspiration, and dispose our minds for the teaching of the Hoty Ghost ! — Let us do this, for assuredly these things were not created for pleasure ; they were made in vain and in waste, if they were not placed there as symbols of religion, as outward instruments of worship. Is it not a work of humihty, to receive with thankfulness whatever outward helps God has given us, or enabled us to use, and to acknowledge with a sigh, that all helps are little enough to free the sinful and imperfect soul from the taint of sin, and cleanse it from that impurity, which must be washed away before it can enter the kingdom of heaven 1 “If this be the true use of the outward creation, if we ought to discipline our mind.s so that everything about us shall serve as a symbol of the Divinity, and an instrument of worship, are we to forget that we have not been born the creatures of mere natural worship? We all fell in Adam, and there fell with Adam, and the powers of the human soul, the whole outward and visible creation. The shock pervaded the entire universe. Throngs of celestial visages, Darkening like water in the breeze, A holy sadness shared. — Wordsworth. FKEDEEICK LUCAS. 65 Earth trembled from her entrails, as again In pangs, and Nature gave a second groan ; Sky loured, and, muttering thunder, some sad drops Wept at completing of the mortal sin Original. — Milton. “ The whole creation suffered in the fall, and groaneth and travaileth in pain together, until it he delivered from the bondage of corruption. Not alone was man redeemed by the sacrifice of the cross. The outward world, which shared in his fall, shared also in his redemption, and now looketh earnestly for a renovation and new birth. This world then, upon which condemnation has fallen, and which bears upon itself by nature no sign of its redemp- tion, is not a perfect symbol of the relation of man to God. It tells us of his power, his wisdom, and his goodness, as they might be known to the enlightened and devout heathen. It speaks to us no word of our redemp- tion and regeneration by grace. Is it lawful then for us to use the outward world and all the forms of it, as symbols of natural religion, and instruments of natural worship, and not to stamp on everything around us symbols of revealed religion, instruments of worship through grace ? If the bursting forth of spring may be permitted to speak to our hearts as the type of the natural bounty of our Creator, and may be used without blame to inspire us ■with feelings of thanksgiving for his outward blessings, may not the crucifix be used without blame also, as a type of the revealed bounty of the Creator, and to inspire us with feelings of thanksgiving for his inward blessings in our redemption and sanctification ? “ But we are told, that the Catholics go far beyond this. F 66 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. This is not the ground of complaint. All this would be innocent and harmless, nay, laudable enough, hut the Catholics worship images, they pay adoration to the works of their own hands; they pray to wood, and stone, and ivory, and transfer to the creature the homage due to the Creator ; they are idolaters ; they actually strike out of the decalogue the second commandment. That this is a most wicked calumny, however often it may he repeated, is notorious to every one who has read the small catechism, the first hook of religious instruction put into the hands of every Catholic child. However, that a lie has been often refuted and exposed is no reason why it should cease to pass for current coin. You cannot nail a lie to a shophoard, as you can a had shilling, and stop its circula- tion for ever. It must and will run on, till the motive which gives it hirth, and the malignity which feeds it and keeps it alive, have been exhausted. But (says an ob- jector, determined to think evil of his fellow-men) the Catholics do worship images, I care not for their catechisms, I have seen them. My good friend (I answer) God alone knows the heart, not you. Worship is an inward act, which you have not seen, and cannot see. I repeat again, it is entirely destitute of proof, and destitute of probability, that there should be any such worship. Images and crucifixes are used — as every man of sense uses the outward world — as symbols of the Divinity, and as means of exciting devotion. “ Oh ! but (continues the objector) the use of images in worship is entirely forbidden; do you suppose, that the heathen believed the images they worshipped to be FREDEEICK LUCAS. 67 divine ? They used them as symbols, and nothing more. I answer : I desire to be no wiser than Isaiah and David, and if this be, as it is often said to be by Protestants, a true account of the old heathen idolatry, then I contend, that Isaiah and David knew nothing about the matter. Turn for a moment to the magnificent invective of the former prophet, in the forty-fourth chapter. Is the practice there denounced, the using of images as symbols ? No. Isaiah denounces the besotted idolater, who believes that he can make a god ; who heweth down cedars, and of the wood makes a fire, and on the coals thereof roasts meat, and eats thereof, and is satisfied, and of the residue HE MAKETH A GOD. And he prays to it, and says unto it, deliver me, for thou art my god. “ The practice denounced by the old Hebrew prophets involved three errors, which an understanding imbued with the Christian belief of an incorporeal, omnipresent God has some difficulty in realizing, but which were then fatal realities. The first error was the belief in an infinity of gods, with human passions and human vices. The idolater, it is well known, prayed to his god for things too atrocious to be named among his fellow men. He substi- tuted, for the worship of the true God, the adoration of the worst portions of his own nature, under the sanctions and forms of religion. Idolatry was, in reality, a worship of devils. The second error was a belief, that, when the idol was fashioned, the devil to whom it was erected joined himself to it, and became in a manner incarnate in the image, as the blessed Son of God became united to flesh and blood; and that the image which the idolater F 2 68 FEEDEEICK LUCAS; worshipped was God, in the same sense as the man Jesus Christ, who was crucified on Mount Calvary, was God ; and to represent the heathen worship as symbolical is as complete a misrepresentation, as the heresy St. John writes against, of those, who taught that Christ’s life, death, and sufferings were only symbolical and repre- sentative, not actual. In the heathen worship, the image was the god. The third error was, that the beings, to whom these images and statues were erected, were no real existences, and never had been. The whole system was not oidy wicked, but it was false, and a lie. ISTow, of course, not one of these three objections can be charged against the Roman Catholics. “ One common form of idolatry among the nations, by whom the Israelites were surrounded, and into which the Israelites themselves were constantly in danger of falling, was the worship of the sun, moon, and stars ; and yet David does not scruple to use these works of God as symbols of His divinity, and to stimulate his own devotion by medi- tating on them, and invoking them and all created nature to join in offering thanksgivings to their Creator. Many of those, whom I am addressing, are, I doubt not, acquainted with Wordsworth’s beautiful poem. The Excursion. Let me for a moment suppose his Wanderer to be a Catholic instead of a Presbyterian, and let us accompany him through some of the scenes, which the poet’s imagination conjures up. In the morning, when he commences the labour and burden of the day, From the naked top Of some bold headland, he beholds the sun Else up and bathe the world in light ! FEEDERICK LUCAS, 69 . As he gazes on the magnificent spectacle, Rapt into still communion, that transcends The imperfect offices of prayer and praise, His mind is a thanksgiving to the power That made him ; it is blessedness and love ! Into the inmost depths of his soul, as he pursues his daily course, The whispering air Sends inspiration from the shadowy heights And blind recesses of the caverned rocks. And in some sequestered spot, where the rocks shut out aU outward objects but the azure sky, the solitary raven, with his iron knell, flying athwart the dark blue dome, rouses within him devout aspirations, and gives him Far stretching views into eternity. The day wanes, and he passes from these valleys and craggy defiles into “an elevated spot,” where he beholds the sun Sinking with less than ordinary state, but, as he sinks, kindling into a blaze of light, “through half the circle of the sky,” the little floating clouds, which' shed each on each. With prodigal communion, the bright hues, Which from the unapparent fount of glory They had imbibed, and ceased not to receive. His mind is filled with rapturous joy, and, falling prostrate on the soft heath, there bursts from him, in holy transport, this devout invocation ; 70 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. Eternal Spirit ! Universal God ! Power inaccessible to human thought, Save by degrees and steps which Thou hast deigned To furnish ; for this effluence of Thyself, To the infirmity of mortal sense Vouchsafed, this local, transitory type Of thy paternal splendours, and the pomp Of those who fill thy courts in highest Heaven, The radiant Cherubim ; accept the thanks Which we, thy humble creatures, here convened, Presume to offer ; we, who from the breast Of the frail earth, permitted to behold The faint reflections only of thy face. Are yet exalted, and in soul adore ! The world is covered with darkness, as the pilgrim still pursues his weary way. He beholds in the distance a little glimmering light among the trees. He turns aside into a by-road, and approaches a humble chapel, where holy men, set apart for the service of God, offer up prayers day and night unceasingly. Oppressed with fa- tigue and travel-stained, longing for the hour when the labour of the day shall cease, and he can betake himself to his humble bed, he enters, and beneath a crucifix, whereon is contained an image of our Blessed Saviour suffering unutterable agony for his redemption, he prostrates him- self with the lowest humility, thanking God for the life and death of that Divine Teacher, who came to make a religion of sorrow and self-denial ; and he passes onwards more refreshed and more strengthened against the mur- murings and complainings of his nature, by that symbol of his Eedeemer’s agony, than by all the splendour of the sun, all the glory of the heaven, all the divine magnifi- cence of the earth. Let me ask, where is the idolatry, i FEEDERICK LUCAS. 71 where is the unspirituality of all this? I answer, it is Christian worship, all of it ; and this last act of devotion the most spiritual of all. Men have worshipped the sun as a god ; who is insane enough to say, that the Wanderer has done so ? Men have worshipped the elemental powers of nature, and the beasts which inhabit the earth, and the birds which fly through the air ; but who accuses the humble Wanderer of idolatry, because they are to him symbols of the one God, and because, impressed by their presence, he devoutly oflers up to his Creator the homage of a grateful heart ? In like manner, men have wor- shipped idols, and in images of wood and stone have offered homage up to devils ; but who shall be mad enough to accuse our Wanderer of idolatry, because the image of Christ crucified is to him a symbol of the Eedemption, recalling to him more forcibly than words or books the love of Him who died — the just for the unjust — to save him from eternal condemnation ? Idolatry is a sin, which in the present day is hardly conceivable, and it is this very difficulty, which leads prejudiced persons to confound two things utterly dissimilar — the devotion of the Catholics, and the idolatrous blasphemy of the heathens.” / I have chosen this passage as a specimen of the whole pamphlet. It is very characteristic, both in its imaginative colouring, and in the skill, with which the feelings of the Protestant wanderer are made imperceptibly to merge in those of the Catholic pilgrim. Even the faults of carelessness in the style, 72 FEEDEEICK LECAS. as when an image is said to be contained on a cru- cifix, are simply indicative of the haste and vehe- mence, with which Lucas wrote. It will be observed, that the line of argument pursued is almost entirely negative, and indeed of considerable force as a reply to specific objections ; and such is the general tone of reasoning throughout the treatise. It does not pretend to offer any positive exposition or defence of the Catholic doctrines, but rather attempts to show how they may be reconciled with views and feelings, which are already familiar to Protestants, and especially to Quakers. Taken in this sense, it is undoubtedly an impressive and powerful piece of writing. As may be supposed, while he was thus eager to propagate his opinions amongst the public, Lucas was even more anxious, if possible, to convince his friends. Por a long time, he tried all that fervour and eloquence could accomplish, to shake what he considered the obstinacy of their Protestant pre- judices ; and it is a striking proof of the genial rich- ness of his nature, that this constant persistence in the advocacy of one set of ideas never degene- rated into triteness, or became wearisome and intoler- able to his hearers. He knew so well how to vary FEEDEKICK LUCAS. 73 his arguments and illustrations, they were so full of life, and freshness, and the bright play of fancy, that his talk never flagged for a moment, and the oldest and gravest subjects seemed always new and inte- resting; while his unfailing gentleness and good- temper (with those, whom he really esteemed) made it impossible to be hurt or offended by anything he said. Earnest as he was in defence of his prin- ciples, he could seldom resist a pleasantry, if it came in his way, even in the midst of a serious discussion ; and I can still see the look of drollery stealing over his face, when, being asked if he could bring himself to believe in the eternal perdition of his Protestant friends, he answered with a mischievous allusion to a well-known dogma : “ Oh, as for you, old fellow ! you are safe in your invincible ignorance !" Besides publishing his Reasons for becoming a Roman Catholic, Lucas contributed about this time several articles to the Dublin Review, and acquired a degree of literary reputation, which made his co- religionists desirous, that he should be permanently engaged in their cause. They had long wished for an organ of their opinions in the public press of England, and everything seemed to point to Lucas as a person well fitted to conduct such an undertaking. 74 FREDERICK LUCAS. While he was inferior to none in zeal for his new faith, his acquaintance with Protestant feelings and modes of thought would of course be an advantage in dealing with the questions of the day. It was therefore proposed to him to become the editor of a weekly newspaper, for which some gentlemen largely engaged in trade were to find the capital. He at once acceded to this request, only stipulating, that he was to have the sole management, with regard to the choice of subjects, and the manner of treating them. He fixed on the name of the Tablet, as a title admitting of a very wide interpretation, and not pledging him to any special course, and he took for his motto the characteristic, though somewhat arrogant words of Burke : “ My errors, if any, are my own. I have no man’s proxy.” A complete history of the Tablet newspaper would be a record of the struggles and vicissitudes of the Koman Catholic party in these islands, through a succession of eventful years. It could only be properly written by one of themselves, and would then, in all probability, be chiefly interesting to Eoman Catholics. I have not attempted any such task. My object is to give a sketch of Frederick Lucas, such as he appeared to those Protestant FEEDERICK LUCAS, 75 friends, who loved and honoured him in spite of all differences of opinion ; and, if I have yet to make some passing allusions to the Tablet, it will only be as far as it bears on the character and fortunes of its editor. The first number was issued on the 16th of May, 1840, and, for nearly fifteen years from that date, Lucas continued to direct the enterprise, and to write most of the principal articles. Though always essen- tially Catholic, it began with a moderation of tone, which strongly contrasted with the violence of a subsequent period, and treated of other subjects besides religion in a fair and liberal spirit. In those early days, some of the literary reviews, and other miscellaneous papers of general interest, were con- tributed by Protestants. For a while, indeed, the Tablet was received with that sort of favour, which candid men are willing to extend to an opponent, whose views they would rather see fuUy stated than either misrepresented or disguised ; and it must be confessed, that the fierce and bitter hostility, which it afterwards met with, was provoked by a corresponding change in its own ipaanner of dealing with its adversaries. It was about this time, that Mr. Carlyle delivered 76 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. his lectures on Heroes and Hero- Worship. In these Lucas took a deep interest, and it was from his careful and accurate notes, that a full report of the first lecture was published in the Tahlet. His in- timacy with the lecturer must have commenced about the same date, for it was certainly not long after, that he was in the habit of resorting occa- sionally to Mr. Carlyle’s house at Chelsea, and he always spoke of these visits with a delight and enthusiasm, which were nowise abated by the radi- cal differences of opinion between himself and his host. It was also in the year 1840, that Lucas married Miss EKzabeth Ashby, a daughter of Mr. William Ashby, of Staines — the lady, to whom he had been for some time engaged. The union was in all re- spects a happy one, except in the loss of their first child, one of the great sorrows of his life, and in the absorbing cares and labours, which left him so little leisure for domestic intercourse. The birth of a second boy came to console them for their first bereavement, and, in every season of trial, Lucas found in liis wife a faithful and devoted helpmate. The Tablet was not long destined to pursue a smooth and prosperous course. Those, who knew FEEDEKICK LUCAS. 77 Lucas well, could Lave foreseen, that, with his bold, impetuous, uncompromising character, he was sure to make enemies in his own party, to offend a thousand susceptibilities, and to rouse innumerable fears. Intent upon one object — the promotion of the interests of his Church, including the broadest asser- tion of the civil rights of its members — he spoke the language of a man thoroughly and heartily in earnest, and had no patience with what appeared to him a weak or temporizing policy. But years of constraint and persecution had not been without effect on the English Eoman Catholics, and had left behind no small share of timidity and caution ; nor were other motives wanting, to moderate the fervour of their zeal. Some amongst them, who had struggled man- fully for political equality, considered that, after the passing of the Belief Bill, they were bound in honour and gratitude not to press unduly for further con- cessions from their Protestant friends and supporters. Others, however sincerely attached to their religion, did not think it necessary or expedient to bring it prominently forward on ordinary occasions, or to connect it with every matter of public interest. Others again were under the influence of strong ^ aristocratic feelings, and shrank from anything like 78 FREDERICK LUCAS. a popular agitation, even in favour of their own views, !N’ow to all these Lucas addressed himself in a tone of indignant remonstrance, as to persons culpably neglectful of the trust committed to their charge ; and it is not wonderful, that they resented this kind of dictation. It must have been especially offensive to those hereditary leaders of the party, whose Catholicism came to them with the estates and honours of their ancestors — who had held firm to their faith through dark and troublous times, who could point to the names of confessors and martyrs in their family history, and whose old manor-houses still contained the hiding-places, which had sheltered a persecuted priesthood, and the secret chapels, where mass had been performed in seasons of im- minent peril. For them to he called to account, and accused of lukewarmness, not by any dignitary of the Church, or other ecclesiastical authority, hut hy an obscure layman, a convert of yesterday, was indeed hard to hear. It is creditable to some of them, that they did hear it with equanimity, and retained their respect for the honest censor, hy whom they had been so unexpectedly attacked ; hut many others were at once repelled and disgusted, and Lucas did not take the best means of conciliation. FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 79 SO that the Tablet had not been many months in existence, before he found himself in opposition to powerful sections of his own religious community. As a Protestant, I should not pretend to judge of the merit of the particular questions in dispute, even if I had any distinct remembrance of their details ; but I cannot help feeling, that, if Lucas could have tempered his zeal with a little more discretion, or if the other side had shown a larger amount of forbear- ance, and he had remained in alliance with the natural leaders of the English Catholics, their in- fluence would all have tended to calm and sober counsels ; while his breach with them threw liim more and more on the support of the Irish party, and led, however unconsciously, to the adoption of a tone of still greater vehemence and exaggeration. In the course of a year or two, another misfortune occurred to the Tablet. The original proprietors failed in business — an extensive leather-trade in Ber- mondsey, wholly distinct from the newspaper — and Lucas was left without resources to carry on the latter. On this occasion, however, his Catholic friends came forward liberally to his assistance, and his own indomitable energy vanquished all other difficulties. Soon after, he was engaged in a dispute 80 FEEDEKICK LTJCAS. with his printers, who endeavoured to get the paper entirely into their own hands, and to supplant him in the management. On the ground of some claim of partnership or copyright, they at one time took possession of the house, in which the publication was carried on ; but Lucas was not the man tamely to submit to such an attempt. He no sooner heard of it, than he repaired to the spot in the early dawn of morning, obtained admission through an open window, by help of a ladder, and without further ceremony forcibly ejected the agents of the intruders. A state of siege followed, in which a garrison of Irishmen kept guard over the citadel. The opposing party, however, continued for a while to publish a paper under the name of the TaMet ; and, to avoid a Chancery suit, Lucas altered the title of his journal to the True Tablet. At this crisis, O’Connell de- clared emphatically in favour of Lucas, and rendered him great service with the Catholic public, who were not long in settling the question between the rival papers. The Pseudo- Tablet died a natural death, and Lucas resumed the name, under which he had first appeared as a journalist. During the next succeeding years, Lucas bore almost the whole burden of writing and conducting o o FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 81 his newspaper. Nor was this by any means the full extent of his labours. He was constantly engaged in correspondence, connected with some religious or political matter, and was consulted by all sorts of people on all sorts of questions. He had moreover a number of literary projects, which he only wanted time and opportunity to carry into execution. Amongst other plans, he once entertained the scheme of a Catholic Encychpoedia, which was to correct what he considered the Protestant errors and pre- judices contained in existing works of that nature, and he seriously looked about for assistance to in- augurate this vast design. I have also reason to believe, that he attended more assiduously than most men the ceremonies and services of his Church, and I know, that he sometimes withdrew to those reli- gious retreats, where pious Catholics are accustomed to seek in solitude and meditation for new strength to encounter the trials and temptations of the world. And here, perhaps, I may be allowed a few words on the peculiar character of his creed, although I ap- proach this subject with considerable hesitation, as looking at sacred things from quite a different point of view, and therefore liable to misunderstand or misrepresent him. G 82 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. It seems to me, that Lucas was not only a Eoman Catholic, not only what is called an Ultramontane, not only an advocate for the extreme claims of the Papacy, but that he was (as far as a man born in our age can be) a Catholic of the twelfth century. For him, the customs, the ceremonies, the legends, the traditions of the Church were all alive and real — not merely ancient rites, or venerable observances, or solemn and pathetic narratives — ^but powers as opera- tive as the changing seasons, and facts as patent as the sun at noonday. His imagination had appro- priated to itself all that world of the Middle Ages, and he lived in it as in his natural home. Most of us have known, in dreams, how the mind becomes reconciled to the most extraordinary circumstances, and, once in the atmosphere of miracles, goes from one marvel to another without any sign of astonish- ment. How Lucas dwelt habitually in such a super- natural atmosphere, and many wonders and extra- vagances, which most modern Catholics would be inclined to apologize for and explain away, were to him perfectly in order, and occasioned no strain upon his faith. Once convinced of the infallibility and miraculous gifts of Eome, he not only accepted her whole system without reserve or quahfication, but FEEDERICK LUCAS. 83 appeared to take delight in the most questionable parts of her history, and to find something congenial in the strangest and wildest of her legends. In matters of religious belief, he might have been a contemporary of St. Bernard, St. Dominic, or St, Francis. No doubt, this description would apply to other Catholics of our time ; but Lucas had the singular faculty of uniting this child-like faith, in its utmost simplicity, not only with strong sense and practical sagacity in secular matters, but with the spirit of liberty and progress, and the love of enquiry and dis- cussion. The twelfth and the nineteenth centuries were strangely blended in his character. While in some things he submitted to the most absolute authority, in others he was ever striving for light and freedom, and, though one portion of his nature seemed entranced in a vision of the past, he took a warm and lively interest in almost every question, that agitated society in his own day. Eetrograde in religion, he was progressive in politics, and no man looked forward with more hope and confidence, to the spread of free institutions, and the establishment of popular rights. I do not mean to say, that he was a revolu- tionist, or even a democrat, in the common sense of G 2 84 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. the word. On the contrary, his sympathies were, I think, aristocratic, and the liberty he contemplated was always based on legal and historical foundations. He had a thorough contempt for the mere cant of Uheralism, and no faith whatever in some new arrangement of the suffrage, or some machinery of a ballot-box, to make corrupt men honest, or foolish men wise. But he had a generous trust in the gradual enlightenment and improvement of his feUow- creatures, to fit them more and more to participate in legislation and government, and he held it to be the true policy of the Church of Eome (subject always to the assertion of her religious supremacy) to ally her- self with the reforming and popular party in every nation, and to take the lead in the general enfran- chisement of Europe. In all these respects, the person, to whose opinions he approached the nearest, was, perhaps, the Count de Montalembert, and I have often heard him speak with high admiration of that distinguished Frenchman. When Pius IX. ascended the throne of St. Peter, Lucas watched with intense interest the spectacle of a reforming Pope, and aU his feelings went fully with the awakened hopes and reviving liberties of Italy. But he saw from the first the dangers, which FEEDEKICK LUCAS. 85 threatened the new freedom on every side, and he spoke in warning tones both to the governors and the governed. The policy he recommended was that of wise, well-considered, gradual, and moderate change, and could his views on this subject have really been carried out, they would have accomplished safely and legally what has since been achieved in a very different manner, at the expense of broken treaties, and at the imminent risk of the peace and security of nations. But it must be confessed, that this temperate and conservative liberalism was not equally apparent, in the course, which the Tablet took on the affairs of Ireland. It is the part of his career, which has ex- posed Lucas to the most obloquy, and which even his friends have found it the most difficult to defend. “ For what can you say,” they have been asked, “ for an Englishman by birth and blood, whose calm and statesmanlike judgment is visible wherever his own country is not directly concerned, but who loses it altogether in the violence and bitterness, with which he urges against her the wrongs and sufferings of another race ? Even if just, there is something un- filial in such denunciations. But could Lucas believe them to be just? Could he really hold England 86 FEEDERIOK LUCAS, responsible for that terrible famine, with which it pleased Heaven for a while to afflict the sister island, only (as we since have seen) to prepare the way for a better and happier future? Did he not know, that every possible effort was made to relieve that fearful calamity, and that, if any error was committed in the method of doing so, it was from no want of good will in the government or people of Great Britain ? Did he really persuade himself, that a native Irish parlia- ment (torn as it would be by factions) would be likely to deal more fairly with the general interests of Ireland, than the Imperial legislature, such as it had of late years shown itself to be ? Lastly, could he blind himself to the fact, that the poverty and distress, which had so long prevailed on the other side of St. George’s Channel, were to be ascribed quite as much to the habits of the people themselves, as to any laws or institutions, that might have been imposed upon them ? ” To all this Lucas would have answered, that the more he loved his country, the more it behoved him to free her from any stain of injustice or oppres- sion, That it was not by flattery or concealment, but by speaking the plain truth, however unpalatable, that he coidd serve her best. That he was not such FKEDEEICK LUCAS. 87 a madman as to attribute the policy of Great Britain with regard to Ireland to malignant hatred ; hut that ignorance and prejudice are often as fatal as ma- lignity, and should he denounced and exposed with the same unsparing frankness. That he was quite willing to admit the factions and the follies of the Irish people; hut that those factions had been fostered, those follies encouraged and perpetuated, by a government, which, in old times at least, had taken for its maxims ; Divide and conquer ! and : Kee^ others weak, that we may he strong! — That the English parliament and people might now he really striving, to the best of their ability, to redress the grievances of the sister island; but that they had failed, and must continue to fail in the attempt, because they looked at all Irish questions, religious, social, or political, from an alien point of view, and could not understand the wants, or sympathize with the feelings, of another and widely different race. That, however little wisdom might be expected from the first efforts of a native parliament, they would at least understand the people they had to govern, better than an assembly of foreigners convened at Westminster — they would restore the Cbrn’ch of the majority of the nation to its old supremacy, they 88 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. would adopt large and comprehensive measures for the relief of distress, and they would apply them- selves to settle, once for all, those disputes about the conflicting rights of landlord and tenant, which lay at the bottom of so much misery, and often led to the perpetration of crime and outrage. And in this view of the subject Lucas would have been perfectly sincere. If it be asked, how a man of his sagacity could fail to perceive, that, whatever may have been the origin of the violent and formid- able factions existing in Ireland, they were now really held in check, and prevented from doing incalculable mischief, by the power of England alone; and that the true hope for the regeneration of the Irish people lay in their own efforts at self- improvement, and the gradual progress of peaceful industry, under the wise, impartial, and beneficent administration of the Imperial government — I can only answer, that he was blinded by the influence of two sentiments, both worthy of respect, and both liable to be carried to excess — devotion to his religion, and strong sympathy with the sufferings of the poor. To promote the interest and extend the sway of the Eoman Catholic Church, which in his mind was identified with Christianity itself. FEEDERICK LUCAS. 89 appeared to him an object of such paramount im- portance, that all other considerations sank into insignificance beside it ; while the sorrows and privations of the Irish peasantry, magnified and coloured by many romantic incidents peculiar to the character of an imaginative people, inspired him with such a mixture of compassion and indignation, that he was hurried beyond all calmness of judg- ment, and, in his eagerness to serve and help them, became sometimes unjust to others, and unwise as to the best means of effecting his purpose. The lines, which Coleridge addressed to Burke, were, I think, in a great measure applicable to Lucas : Thee stormy pity, and the cherished lure Of pomp, and proud precipitance of soul, Wildered with meteor fires ! And it might with equal truth have been added, that he too “ never drank Corruption’s bowl.” For, in the midst of all this vehemence, his thoughts were ever fixed on doing what he considered his duty to God and his country, never for a moment on the gratifica- tion of a personal feeling, or the advancement of a ♦ private interest. Many might accuse him of rash- ness, intolerance, prejudice, or passion ; but no one, that really knew him, could dream of imputing any 90 FREDERICK LUCAS. base or selfish motive to a man, whom, as an Irish friend of his once said of him, all the gold in the Bank of England could not have bought, and a charge of the Life Guards would not have frightened. The year 1848, emphatically the year of revolu- tions, spread wonder and alarm through almost every country of Europe, and, although the throne of Great Britain stood unmoved amid the shock of falling dynasties, there was even here a moment of con- siderable excitement and uneasiness. In England, it is true, the Chartist movement was at once deprived of all danger by the firm and united attitude of the great body of the middle classes ; but, in Ireland, a small party of political enthusiasts, young, head- strong, and violent, whom the departure of O’Connell from the scene had allowed to take a prominent position, were urging the people to rebellion, and openly preparing for an armed resistance to the government. That their schemes were wholly chime- rical, and could never have succeeded against the power of England, backed by the bulk of the pro- perty and intelligence of their own country, is, I think, morally certain ; but it appears to me equally clear, that, had they obtained the support of the Eoman Catholic Clergy, and of that large section, FKEDEEICK LUCAS. 91 over whom Lucas and the Tablet exercised no mean influence, their efibrts must have issued in a wide- spread insurrection, which could only have been suppressed at the cost of much misery and blood- shed. Now with regard to this Young Ireland party, as it was called, Lucas stood in a diflicult and hazardous relation. He had advocated many of their views on general Irish politics, he was on terms of intimacy with several of their leaders, and had always been treated by them personally with consideration and respect. But he entirely disapproved of their present course, and urged on them again and again, that the only weapon they should use against the English government was that of legal and constitutional opposition, and that as surely as they took the sword, so surely would they perish by the sword. In private and in public, in season and out of season, at every possible opportunity, he strove to divert them from the mad career, on which they had entered ; and he took care to let them know in the plainest terms, that, if they persevered in it, they could only count on his most active and strenuous resistance. Yet, all this time, his English friends had the pain of perceiving, that he was himself suspected of disaffec- 92 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. tion, and supposed to share in the treasonable counsels of the conspirators. No imputation was ever more absurdly false. Bold, uncompromising, and imprudent as his language often was on political subjects, it had at least the merit of being perfectly clear and open, without any reticence or disguise, and the line of action he recommended was thoroughly straightforward and consistent. He held, that, under the British Constitution, every change, that was worth effecting at all, could be brought about legally and peaceably, by the influence of free discussion upon public opinion, and, while he deprecated violence, he had the greatest contempt for all secret plotting. It was not only opposed to his principles, but altogether repugnant to the frankness and manliness of his nature. And, more than this, however extreme may have been his views on questions of Irish policy, there is not the shadow of a shade of a reason for doubting his loyalty to the English crown; and I feel persuaded, that, if any real danger had threatened the throne of these realms, whether from foreign or domestic foes, no man would have ventured more than Lucas, with tongue, and pen, and sword if necessary, in defence of his rightful sovereign. As it was, he did the State good service in this FREDERICK LUCAS. 93 time of crisis. Tailing to induce the Young Ireland party to abandon their schemes, he applied himself with all his usual energy to prevent others from joining them. Numbers, who would have refused to listen to any advice tendered by political opponents, were willing to be guided by the opinions of a friend, who had proved himself, within certain limits, to be ready to go as far as most men in favour of Irish views. He denounced the folly and wickedness of civil war, as in any case too high a price to pay for the attainment of their objects, and, what was stiU more to the purpose with the audience he was ad- dressing, he demonstrated the utter impracticability of a successful insurrection. In a series of articles, remarkable for the technical knowledge they dis- played, he went into all the details of a possible campaign in Ireland, and showed, that the insurgents must be beaten by the necessary conditions of the contest. There can be no doubt, that these articles had great influence in deterring many from taking part in a desperate attempt, and so were the means of averting much evil. The Young Ireland con- spiracy ended, as every one knows, in an abortive and ridiculous enterprise, and, instead of enveloping the whole land in fire and blood, the last sparks of 94 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. rebellion were trodden out by a few policemen in the Widow McCormack’s cabbage-garden ! It was with reference to this affair, and to the subsequent rumours of a French invasion, that Lucas set himself to study military tactics, and was soon deep in the works of the principal masters of strategy. As one result of the knowledge thus ac- quired, he wrote in the year 1849 an article in the Duhlin Review, on the Campaigns of the Duhe of Marlborough, which at once attracted the attention of Sir William Napier, the historian of the Penin- sular War, This competent judge at first supposed the article to be written by a soldier, and, when he learned who the author really was, hastened to seek his acquaintance, and to offer him all sorts of com- mendation and encouragement. Lucas had a won- derful facility in mastering the details of almost any subject; but I cannot help thinking, that he had. a peculiar aptitude for military matters, and that, had he embraced the profession of arms, he had all the qualifications for attaining to eminence in the field. Towards the end of 1849, Lucas received a pressing invitation to remove the Tablet to Dublin, and, after some brief deliberation, determined to PEEDEEICK LUCAS, 95 comply with, the wishes of his Irish friends. He believed, that he should be more in the centre of his Catholic supporters, and able to act more directly on Irish opinion. The change was not unattended with inconvenience and sacrifice. He had to break up his modest English home, to leave old friends and associates, and to transport his family amongst comparative strangers. From the time of his mar- riage, he had resided at Kensington, and there, in a quiet and frugal fashion, had been accustomed to receive visitors of different ranks and various endowments. The res angustce domi never troubled hhn for a moment — ^his purse (at no time a heavy one) was always open to his friends and to the poor — but he cared nothing for display, and held in just contempt that miserable weakness, which thinks it necessary to ape the outward appearances of wealth and station. With him, “plain living and high thinking” were natural and habitual. If he ever indulged in any superfluous expense, it was in the purchase of books, but these were in some sort the essential food of his mind. I can well remember a small room, which he used as a library and study, crowded from skirting-board to ceiling with these literary treasures, and the very floor strewed with 96 FEEDEEICK LUCAS, pamphlets and papers. He would step out from the midst of the confusion, with the cheerful smile, and the warm welcome ; and, although at first you might have to tread with caution, and even have some difficulty in finding an unoccupied seat, you were soon more at your ease than in the gayest and brightest saloon, and charmed with a conversa- tion such as is seldom heard in any circle. It was therefore a great loss and sorrow to some in London, when Lucas took his departure for Ire- land. They hoped indeed, that his absence might be but temporary, and that, a few years hence, the former relations would be renewed on the old footing. They could not foresee, that, with the exception of one .or two short intervals, and a chance meeting now and then, the separation was to be final. notwithstanding the kind reception, which Lucas met with in Dublin, he too cast back many a “longing, lingering look” towards his old haunts and companions, I have some of his letters, chiefly treating of private and personal subjects, which could only interest the parties concerned ; but, with- out imitating the modern practice of dragging all sorts of trivial and irrelevant matter before the public, I think I may venture on a few brief FREDEEICK LUCAS. 97 extracts, as illustrative of his views and feelings at this time. “Dublin, January, 1850. “ Your letter, old fellow, was most welcome in this land of exile, where, however, I comfort myself in a very jolly fashion. As far as I can judge, everything is going on well, and I certainly have had success so far. I mean, that, from what they were in London, my subscribers have increased some hundreds, and are increasing. I have no end of troubles in moving, as you may imagine, but, thank God, everything has gone well with me except in the press-worTc, and there my experience has been disastrous. However, I see even here a dawn of better hopes, and am not absolutely cast down even in that. What can I tell you in return for your budget of news 1 You don’t care about Irish affairs, you wretched Saxon, and what others have I to write about ? I can say : How is Mrs. E ? pray give her my kindest regards. How are M and B 1 Eemember me to them all, most kindly and even tenderly. But when I have said that, what the deuce do you care about anything else I can teU you ? Oh, I re- member — I made a foray, not exactly into England, but into Wales last Monday, to meet and bring home Mrs. Lucas, who is now with Angelo and your humble servant at Eongstown. As I got to the Menai Strait first, I spent an hour or so in looking at the Menai Bridge. I had not much time, it was raining, and I had no guide, so I saw few details ; but I went into the tube nearest the shore, which is constructed on a scaffolding in the very place H 98 FKEDEEICK LUCAS. where it is to remain. There I saw little hoys of ten years old, taking with pincers iron holts red-hot out of a fire, outside the tube and on a level with the bottom of it, and with the greatest nonchalance fiinging them to the top of the tube, apparently among a crowd of workmen, one of whom received the bolt, and drove it in. The elements of the construction are all very simple, and I saw pretty nearly both what they were, and what they look like when put together. One line of tubes is complete across the strait. Others I saw at a distance, being made on the shore. Though not so elegant, of course, as the Chain Bridge, it is too far off to extinguish it, and has a pecu- liar character of rude sublimity, which is not at all out of place. The Pyramids, I take it, are not at all handsome, and this is a much greater work than all the Pyramids put together, or multiplied by a thousand.” “Kingstown, April, 1850. “ I had been fearing to hear from you, lest you should blow me to the clouds of the Antipodes for having kept silence so long, but the truly Christian tone of your letter reassures me, and, afraid of another mishap, I sit down at once to answer it as confidently as if I had never sinned. I have had no end of bother with printing, i. e. machining, and have never felt sure on Monday morning, that the paper would really be published on the next Saturday. I have had a run of bad luck in this way, which would have ruined inevitably a paper not yet tolerably established. In every other respect, I have had very good fortune — not hrilliant fortune, but the kind of success which promises FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 99 durability. I don’t know, that I bave gone back in any respect, in many there is a decided improvement, there is a much greater opening for the future, and plenty of work to do of a kind that I like, and which I find I can do nearly as well as my neighbours. I am projecting, as an addition to the Tablet, a paper three days a week, which ought to bring in a considerable access of profit. You may perhaps see an announcement of this kind shortly in the Tablet. “We have just got tiled in, in a house of our own here at Kingstown, and, allowing 12^. a year for railway to Dublin, I pay for rent, rates, taxes, &c. about half as much as at Kensington. As the house really is comfortable and suitable, and as we have sea-air, and most exquisite scenery within a shilling ride of us, besides seeing mountains out of our back- windows, I think this is not a bad basis to begin upon. “We often think and talk of you, I promise you, and wish much to get back to London for a time, to see our old friends. I want much to see old M again. The old chap has nothing in the world to do ; why doesn’t he behave like a man, and come over here to spend the summer at a reasonable rate, instead of spending his money in your outrageously extravagant neighbourhood?” “Kingstown, January, 1851. “ Please Heaven, we will meet this year somehow, by hook or by crook ! — I think it very improbable, that the year will pass over without my being in London, though certainly the Great Exhibition will not be the attraction. 100 FEEDEKICK LUCAS. And yet I have some feelings of local attachment, and a longing sometimes to see how Hyde Park looks with the huge glass house in the middle of it, and many other things, persons, and places. Hay, to tell you the truth, if I had not had the luck to be married, I should have seen you half a dozen times at least in the year 1850. But a wife and brat are terribly anti-locomotive. Hot that I have been very sedentary during the last half-year, but a journey to London alone was not to be thought of So I could only tantalize myself by going down to the Pier, and watching the boats go to Liverpool and Holy- head, reflect on the facility of transit, fancy myself on the way to London, and — ^walk rather thoughtfully up the hill to Cedar Place. “ Thoughtfully, not sadly. Por I have neither time nor inclination to be sad. I have hitherto succeeded better than I had any reason to expect. I have got into the right position among the various parties here, and feel myself (morally speaking) on firm ground. In other respects, I am well enough ) though, not having my balance-sheet quite completed, I shall not be certain for a week or two about the year’s proceedings. However, I know by the circulation and some other leading points, that I was never better, I think never so good, and it strikes me that I am on the way to improve. Besides, I have gobd people about me in every department, and (though for aught I know some heavy stroke may be im- pending) I have none but the ordinary cares and anxieties, which belong to any condition of hfe. Add to this, I have plenty to do, the work such as I like, the objects of FREDEKICK LUCAS. 101 it such as engage every faculty and energy I possess — and, to crown all, a happy home, an aifectionate wife who keeps me straight just where I am wanting to myself, and a child, whom (as I am bound to do) I firmly believe to be a prodigy. What on earth can a man want more, and how can he be thankful enough for having so much? And yet there is nothing out of the way in supposing, that four-and-twenty hours may change the scene, and leave me like Job on a dunghill, scraping myself with a broken sugar-basin. “ I daily rejoice in the recollection of our old Debating Society, and I take some pride in remembering, in con- nexion with it, almost the ordy instance of real perse- verance I was ever guilty of — I mean, in labouring to overcome a most painful nervousness, &c. The year I devoted myself to do that has made me of twice the value here, and, if I had not done it then, I should never have done it. Oh, Lord ! when I attend Committees, and Conferences, and Public Meetings, and speak from the tops of barrels, and out of public-house windows, and in all sorts of strange places, you can’t teU how often I think about the old days, and the old places, and the good old fellows who then were. I wish some of you were here — and yet I sometimes wish not ; for, in this sort of public life, friendship is oddly mixed up with a secret jealousy, or, if that word is too strong, with little ranklings of mutual discontent, which amongst old friends are more painful than separation. “We won’t discuss the Papal Aggression just now, for I have no time. All will go well, I dare say, and for my 102 FEEDEKICK LUCAS. part I jjrefer the hostility of the Whigs, and penal laws, to their friendship, which I believe to he radically and necessarily treacherous. You may have reason to lament the perturbation caused on your side of the channel. Here, we are as stagnant as mud about it ; and, as a mere religious question, I would willingly — if I could afford it — have paid down 1,000^. to purchase Lord John’s letter with its consequences.” The speeches and popular demonstrations, to which Lucas alludes in the above extract, were connected with the subject of Tenant Eight, which was be- coming a question of great public interest in Ireland. Here, as on previous occasions, Lucas found himself once more in direct opposition to his EngKsh friends. They could not understand how land was to be treated on quite a different footing from every other property, and why the legislature was to interfere in this instance only, to alter the natural laws of supply and demand. They contended, that the tenant was as free to make a bargain for himself as the landlord, and that it was his own fault if he entered on a tenancy, without obtaining some secu- rity for the fair enjoyment of any improvements he might undertake. But Lucas answered, that these views could only arise from a total ignorance of the FREDERICK LUCAS. 10:3 condition of Ireland. He said, that the competition for land was so intense, that it was hopeless for the tenant to ask for the protection of a lease or agree- ment, and, being generally a small holder, and a poor man, he was entirely at the mercy of his landlord, who, being often himself thriftless and embarrassed, was ever ready to wring the uttermost farthing from his victim, and immediately to appro- priate to himself any improvements, for the sole purpose of raising the rent. If it was observed, that such conduct was very much like killing the goose that laid the golden eggs, because it clearly tended to put a stop to all improvements — he at once ad- mitted, that it was so, hut maintained, that the evil had become so habitual and ineradicable, that, for the sake both of tenants and landlords, he saw no remedy except in legislation. His English friends still urged, that the evil would cure itself with the growing wealth and intelligence of Ireland — that the thing really wanted was to substitute solvent land- lords and substantial tenants for the present occu- pants of the soil — that emigration, the sale of encumbered estates, and the rise and progress of new branches of industry, were slowly, but surely, effecting this beneficent revolution — and that it would 104 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. be wiser to trust to the gradual operation of the laws of nature, than to seek to subvert those general principles, which govern the tenure of property throughout the British Isles. But Lucas indignantly replied, that we had no right to sacrifice even one generation to a possible future — that the persons, in whom he was interested, the clients, whose cause he was pleading, were not the ideal farmers of a coming age, but the living men, women, and children, who were driven from their homes, and reduced to beggary and starvation, by that system of rack-rents, which was at once a stupidity and a crime. He grew warm and eloquent in painting the sufferings of the small farmers and peasantry, and no one, who heard him, could doubt, that, whether right or wrong in the measures he proposed for their relief, he was most ardent and sincere in his desire to aid and protect them. And, indeed, this sympathy with the poor was one of his striking characteristics. I have often noticed, that nothing gave him more pleasure than the sight of a neat, comfortable cottage, however humble, with the gay little patch of garden-ground, the tidy house- wife, and the healthy children— while rags and squalor were to him equally painful, and the sorrows FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 105 of helpless and indigent people moved his compas- sion to an extraordinary degree. I have frequently heard him say, that he thought the happiest con- dition of life was that of a poor, honest man, able to support his family decently by his labour ; but he felt acutely for such a person, when any combi- nation of circumstances prevented him from earning his daily bread, and he cherished the notion, that, in a Christian country, there could always be found a remedy for such a calamity. His mind was far too vigorous to indulge in mere sentimentalism on these subjects, and he was ever seeking to elaborate some practical scheme for the relief of distress. Many of his projects may have been utopian, but they were certainly not taken up from caprice, or without method and forethought ; and as one proof of this it may be mentioned, that he latterly gave much time to the study of political economy, and took a special interest in the social theories of a writer, who has never been suspected of belonging to the sentimental school — I mean Mr. John Stuart Mill. The eyes of many Catholic Irishmen were now fixed on Lucas, as a fitting person to represent their interests in parliament, and, when an opportunity offered in 1852, they resolved to propose him as a 106 FEEDEKICK LUCAS. member for the County of Meath. As soon as he had yielded to their wishes, he set about his canvass with his accustomed energy, and was not long in discovering, that, Saxon as he was, he had the bulk of the clergy and people with him. After a sharp contest, he was triumphantly returned by a large majority, the numbers being, at the close of the poll, Lucas 2,004, Corbally 1,968, Grattan (the unsuc- cessful candidate) 565. When the news of his election reached London, his friends naturally wrote to congratulate him, and, amongst others, I addressed a few lines to him, in which I ventured to express a hope, that, in the new field of action now opening before him, he would rise above all narrow party-views and sectarian politics, and take the place he was fitted for in the great council of the nation. I believe, I must have drawn some comparison between Burke and O’Connell, as an illustration of the superiority of the real states- man over the most able and successful demagogue. These few words of explanation are necessary for the understanding of the following remarkable letter. “ 21 Hardwicke Street, Dublin, 28th July, 1852. “I cannot tell you the pleasure your most kind and affectionate letter of congratulation has given me. I have FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 107 reached home from Meath only a few hours, and, after the excitement of the election, I must confess it, that I feel in rather low spirits — hut your letter warms the cockles of my heart. It is a perfect transcript of yourself, and read- ing it makes me long to throw politics to the devil, in favour of the old Saturday-nights’ conversaziones. This whole business of M.P., with the weight, duties, and diffi- culties of it, by anticipation almost presses me to the earth. Often and often, I wish I could wash my hands of it. Why? l^ot from any false modesty assuredly. I think, if I were an English Protestant, taking my stand in the ranks of either Whig or Tory, upon the recognized prin- ciples and ideas of either of those parties, I could discharge my duties in a very tolerable and creditable manner. Even then I should be nervous and anxious about success, because such is my nature. But, in fact, I go into the House of Commons, to stand (I fear) very nearly alone — a member of an unpopular minority, an unpopular member of that minority, and disliked even by the greater number of the small party with which I am to act — and having cast upon me, in a prominent manner, the defence of the two noblest causes in the world ; that of a religion, which it requires great learning to defend properly, and that of the most ill- treated and (in all essential qualities of heart and character) the noblest population, that ever existed on the face of the earth. I am very poorly and hurriedly describing to you what it is that weighs me down. But I think you will understand me. You talk of Burke and O’Connell, and indeed to do adequately what I ought to do would require a Burke or an O’Connell — that is, a man, who, in an 108 FKEDEEICK LUCAS. assembly of really able men, can stand alone on bis own resources and character, against every opposition from within and from without. I think my own course will be the one I shall follow, and that you will disapprove — nor do I believe, that the bad element, to which you refer, of selfish, shabby Irish members, will have much influence upon me. But it will be one of the greatest disagreeables of my course, that fair, candid, and just men like yourself, looking at these subjects through different media and associations, will condemn as irrational what I believe to be just and necessary. It remains to be seen and tried, whether I can hold as true to my own convictions in parliament as I have done in the press — and I am sure, that with my many weaknesses of character this will be utterly impossible, without a special grace of Almighty God to save me from total political extinction. You wiU laugh, perhaps, at my calling the Irish people f :.e finest pisantry in the world. But the limited inter- course I have had with them has left on my mind a very strong impression, that there is not in the world a people — I refer to the unsophisticated portion of the country people — for whom a man of any heart or conscience would sooner lay down his life. The wrongs they continue to endure fill me with a passionate indignation, which I hardly know how either to express or to repress, and I would give every hope I have in this world to alleviate them but a little. I fancy, that a man, who enters the House of Commons with these feelings, is little better than a fool. What right has he to dream of an Irish people, possessing an Irish character, requiring an Irish FKEDEKICK LUCAS. 109 ■ social and political organization, unfitted for the narrow pedantry of English systems, and whom an English House of Commons may torture, hut cannot govern 1 — to dream of such a people, and to labour to get for them institutions, which the English intellect must despise, exactly in pro- portion as they are really suited to the people for whom they are intended ? — I fancy, that to attempt wisdom for Ireland in an English House of Commons is, not exactly a contradiction in terms, hut a practical contradiction just about as gross. Anyhow, I have it in my mind, that I shall fail in my endeavour, that my abilities are not equal to the task before me, that I shall be rudely thrust out of the saddle upon the ground, and that, before two years’ time, I may be digging gold in or near Port Philip. In the mean time, my dear old friend, I shall try to do my part like a man, and, whether I fail or succeed, I shall at all events love both my old friends and niy new friends, and carry in my heart wherever I go the memory of that quarter of a century, which has not cast even a moment’s shade over the true and sincere friendship, that has bound us together during more than a third part of this mortal span. “We are here all quite well, and I hope we may all meet you all in October. With kindest regards, &c. Yours affectionately, E. Lucas. “ P. S. I am heartily glad Macaulay is in the House, for every reason. I said nothing about it in the Tablet, because I thought my advocacy would do him no good, but perhaps the reverse.” 110 FREDERICK LUCAS. The difficulties attending his first appearance in the House of Commons, which Lucas describes in the above letter, were indeed real and formidable. He came as a stranger amongst strangers, to defend a most unpopular cause, and he belonged to a party, which all other sections of the assembled senate regarded as a nuisance and obstruction, or something worse. It was not merely that this party interrupted the public business, by the intrusion of Irish questions on every occasion — not merely that it changed sides, and upset or endangered ministries, upon principles wholly unintelligible to the ordinary Englishman — but that its members were generally viewed with dis- like and suspicion, either as fanatics, whose violence could only be explained by their Celtic temperament, or as adventurers, who had taken to politics as a trade, and were ready to sell their votes and their con- sciences to the highest bidder. Just or unjust, this was the estimate formed of them. And, if some allowances were made for the accidents of birth and education, no such excuses could be pleaded in the case of Lucas. He was not an Irishman, and he had not been born a Eoman Catholic. He was looked upon as a renegade from his religion, and, in some sort, an enemy to his country. The reputation. FEEDEEICK LUCAS. Ill which had preceded him, was that of a truculent journalist, known to he extreme in his opinions, and supposed to he unscrupulous in his designs. And, to balance all this prejudice, he had scarcely a friend or acquaintance (out of his own small party) within the walls of parliament. His elder brother had married a sister of Mr. Bright, who was then member for Manchester, and he may have known one or two of the more advanced English Liberals. But, with these exceptions, he stood, as he himself describes it, alone. Ho man ever entered the House of Commons under greater disadvantages, and whatever success he achieved there must have been owing to personal qualities of no common order. It is creditable to Englishmen, that their strongest antipathies do not prevent their giving a patient hearing to an adversary, if he has really anything to say, and from the moment, that Lucas first rose to address the House, he was listened to without inter- ruption. It was not long, indeed, before the cloud of prejudice against him began to disperse. His very look and manner, suggestive rather of some stalwart Kentish yeoman, than of Irish rapparee or Popish conspirator, told at once on the assembled Commons. The portly figure, the frank, fair, Saxon 112 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. countenance, the genial smile, the glance of kindly humour, the unaffected and manly bearing, were sure to impress an English audience in his favour ; and when it was found, that he brought to every subject, of which he treated, considerable knowledge of detail, great skill in arranging his facts, and the power of putting a statement in the clearest light, accompanied by^ a flow of language and illustration, which rose often to eloquence, while none, who saw and heard him, could doubt for an instant of his sincerity — the former hostility and suspicion were replaced by something like interest and sympathy. Ministers and leaders of party accosted him in words of compliment, and the House granted him that respectful attention, which is the highest praise from political opponents. Personally, he became almost popular ; and I believe it is no exaggeration to say, that, before he had been many months in parliament, the only feeling, with which he was regarded by those, who differed from him most widely, was one of regret, that so gifted and amiable a man should be engaged in such a cause. Yet certainly, in the matters debated, he had done nothing to conciliate them. He avowed the most unpopular opinions without reserve, and the FREDERICK LUCAS. 113 questions, on which he spoke, were jnst those most likely to irritate an English and Protestant assembly. Not only Tenant Eight, but the existence of the Esta- blished Church in Ireland, and the whole system of National Education, afforded him opportunities for attack ; and when his Church was in turn assailed, as in the case of the government grant to the College at Maynooth, or the disposal of the property of Nuns in Convents, he always scorned a merely defensive warfare, and at once carried the assault into the lines of the enemy. On the Maynooth question, for instance, he not only offered to give up the grant, hut urged the Catholics to reject it, and to take their stand altogether on the voluntary principle — with the view of applying that principle, in its full extent, to all other sects and churches — to the “ministers’ money ” of the Presbyterians, and to the endowments of the Establishment. When the persecution at Florence of two converts to Protestantism (the Madiai) was brought before the House of Commons, Lucas did not content himself with denying the policy and propriety of the English parliament’s interference with the laws and customs of a foreign country — hut he argued, that the same zeal for religious liberty should carry them still further, and I 14 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. he called on them to interfere also, if they interfered at all, on behalf of certain converts to Catholicism, who had been persecuted in like manner in some of the Protestant countries of Northern Europe. This ingenious diversion took the sting from the attack on the Catholics, and obliged the Evangelical Alliance, which had strongly advocated the cause of the Madiai, to include all these other instances of per- secution in a common censure. But, besides running counter to the Protestant feeling of the majority of the House, Lucas soon managed to come into col- lision with a section of his own small party. He believed, that he had discovered intrigues, which seriously affected the political honesty of more than one of the Irish members, and he did not scruple to denounce them in plain terms. Whatever may be thought of his prudence in this affair, most English- men have long been convinced, and few candid Irishmen will deny, that such corruption really existed, and, if Lucas incurred much obloquy in exposing it, we have only another proof of that singleness of purpose, with which he pursued a public object at every personal risk. All this time, his early English friends watched his proceedings with anxious interest, and waited FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 115 eagerly for .the next phase in his career. They felt, that he had not yet done full justice to his own great powers, and that the game he was playing was on too confined a scale. As .a speaker and politician, he was now the foremost man amongst the Catholics of the United Kingdom, and it seemed a pity and a wrong, that his abilities should be wasted on mere sectarian disputes, and on the proverbial narrowness and virulence of Irish party-feuds. Those, who had known him longest and best, believed, that he was fitted by nature and cultivation for far other work, and they still fondly hoped, that, on the broad field of Imperial politics, he would one day break through the trammels of sect and faction, rise to the height of some great argument, and take his place amongst the leading statesmen and orators of his age. Alas ! it was not to be. The labours of the last few years had proved too much even for that strong frame. The amount of work he went through cannot be fully known, but it must have been something prodigious. His attendance in parliament, and the editorship of his newspaper, formed but a small portion of his occupations ; he was at the same time engaged in the weeding and organization of his party, plunged deep in the agitation for Tenant Eight, and I 2 116 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. constantly interrupted by the claims of a voluminous correspondence, on almost every subject of Irish or Catholic interest. Already in the autumn of 1853 he had a serious illness, and was even then advised to withdraw, at least for a time, from all public business. It was neither vanity nor ambition, nor any form of selfishness, that prevented his doing so. Had he consulted his own wishes, he would have retired both from parliament and the press, and have sought in Australia a new home for himself and family. More than once, in the few short interviews I had with him about this period, he reverted to the longing he felt for rest, and to his ideal of a happy life in some distant colony, spent in the tillage of his own fields, and the education of his boy. The soothing influences of natural scenery, and books, and leisure, and quiet thought — these were the visions, which floated through the weary brain of the politician; and, if he resisted all their allure- ments, it was that in his soul and conscience he believed, that duty to God and his country bound him to the post he then occupied, and, living or dying, he was resolved to maintain it to the last. The year 1854 brought him a new source of uneasiness. He had hitherto counted on the support FREDERICK LUCAS. 117 of tlie Irish Eoman Catholic clergy, and the priest- hood in general had been his unwearied and zealous allies. But now came a warning from high eccle- siastical authority, exhorting the priests to attend more to their strictly religious duties, and prohibiting them altogether from interference in political affairs. Most Englishmen will agree in the spirit of that prohibition, but Lucas held, that it was an infringe- ment on the rights of an oppressed people, whose clergy had been their chief mouth-piece, in making known their grievances and their wrongs. He deter- mined to appeal from the episcopal decision to the Holy See itself, and, in the course of the autumn, he started on a mission to Rome, to intercede with the Pope in favour of his clerical friends. Of what passed at Rome, I have no certain or definite knowledge. There is no doubt, that Lucas was most kindly received by the Pope, and met with many flattering attentions from learned and pious ecclesiastics ; it is equally sure, that the city itself, with all its noble and venerable associations, in- terested him greatly; but I have some reason to think, that he was deeply disappointed at the slow progress he made in the object of his mission. He found that the Papacy was by no means exempt 118 FEEDEEICZ LUCAS. from the delays and vexations of courts, and that human jealousies and infirmities cluster around the chair of St. Peter, as well as about more earthly thrones. He was invited to prepare a memorial, containing a full statement of his case, and to this task he devoted the whole of the winter. But the climate of Eome, joined to the incessant labour and anxiety, was preying more and more upon his health, and the month of May 1855 found him so feeble and exhausted, that it was necessary for him to return to England, though with the intention of going back to Eome in the course of a few weeks. A party-divi- sion was about to take place in the House of Com- mons, and, in order to be in time for it, he travelled night and day, and arrived in London so thoroughly worn out, that, when he presented himself at the entrance of the House, the door-keeper did not know him, and hesitated to admit him. He afterwards said, that this incident first showed him how ill he really was. It was soon too fatally clear, that he was indeed in a most precarious state. Still there remained some hope of his recovery, if he could be induced to give himself the needful repose. He was persuaded to consult a first-rate medical opinion, and was at once ordered to abstain FREDEKICK LUCAS. 119 from all manner of work. He now accepted an invitation from his friend and colleague, Mr. Swift, to spend some weeks at his house at Wandsworth. It was here that I visited him for the last time. He was indeed sadly changed; the cheek was sunken, the eye had lost its lustre, the hair had grown prematurely grey; but the old smile, played about his lips, and he talked with the spirit and cheer- fulness of his best days. It was a fine evening, and we walked together in the garden. He spoke with pleasure of Eoman buildings and antiquities, and of the kind and fatherly reception he had met with from the Pope, but very little was said on the subject of his mission. Of course, it was the state of his health, in which I was chiefly interested. He spoke of it freely, without either presumption or de- spondency. He said in his simple way, that he was ready to submit to God’s will, whether it required him to work or rest. And then, with a certain humorous pathos, which was at once comical and affecting, this man, the most active and restless, of mortals, began to vaunt the delights of idleness, and to declare how fortunate he thought himself in the prospect of a visit to Brighton, in which he should sit on the beach all day long, and have nothing to do 120 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. but to fling stones into the sea ! — On the whole, his conversation inspired me with the best hopes, and I parted from him with no presentiment, that we were never again to meet in this world. Soon after, he went for a few days to Weybridge, and thence to his father’s house at Brighton, where he remained for about two months. During this time, the progress of disease was slow, but not the less certain ; and when, early in September, he went with the intention of paying a short visit to his brother-in-law, Mr. Skidmore Ashby, of Staines, he grew so rapidly worse, that it was found impossible to remove him. His friends heard with dismay, that his physician had abandoned all hopes of his recovery, and that, as it was unadvisable to risk any disturbance or excitement, they must renounce even the poor consolation of bidding him a last farewell. Yet he retained all his intellect and fortitude to the end. His affectionate wife never left his side, and was at once his nurse and secretary, for, even in that near prospect of death, he continued to send messages, and dictate letters, with the utmost calm- ness and perspicuity. He desired to be most kindly remembered to aU his friends, Protestant FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 121 and Catholic, and I know of few death-bed incidents more striking than the following letter, addressed to the Eev. Thomas O’Shea, one of the most enthu- siastic of his Irish supporters. “Staines, September 28th, 1855. “ My dear Father Tom, “I don’t know whether I am glad or sorry, that your notion of my disorder is so mistaken. The truth is, that it is pretty fairly spread over most of the organs of my body ; that I am now suffering under enlarged heart, bronchitis, congested liver, inert kidneys, a stomach that refuses food, asthma that forbids sleep, and, to crown all, the dropsy. As Sydney Smith says in one of his letters : I have seven or eight complaints, hut in all other respects I am perfectly well. In plain and sober seriousness, my dear Father Tom, I have given up all hope of life, have received the Last Sacraments, and though, perhaps, not immediately to die, for this is in God’s hand, yet I have now no other business than to make the best preparation I can for the Judgment Seat of the Almighty, and to request all the prayers of my friends, to help me through this fearful passage, which, I hope, may be from death to life. “Thank God, I have no wish to hve. I ask for no prayers for restoration to health. I have never valued life very much, and now less than ever. Dear Father Tom, it would be a great pleasure for me to see you again before I die. We have fought many a battle together, at your imminent peril, and I never found in you less than the courage of a hero, perfect unselfishness, zeal untiring. 122 FEEDEEICK LUCAS. and a devotion to the cause of God and the poor, which it will be difficult to surpass. Now, when, perhaps, I am presently to stand face to face with my Creator and Eedeemer, I esteem it an honour to have fought so often by your side, and though I do not regret for a moment that my exertions have tended to shorten my life, I do most bitterly regret that your nobleness and heroism have brought on you so sad a persecution. However, my dear Father Tom, let me say to you, and to our friends of your diocese, not to be downcast or disheartened. As sure as God is in Heaven, your cause is the cause of truth and honour ; and when your last hour comes, you will all feel what consolation it gives a man never to have flinched in the worst of times — as I may say of you — or given way in the public service to selfish personal considerations. “ My dear Father Tom, I would give a little world to press your hand once more, and to receive your blessing. Make my kindest adieus to all our friends, particularly to Father Keefie, your good brother, the Archdeacon, Father Aylward, our friends in Tipperary, and my most worthy and venerated friend, the Archdeacon of Eathkeale. “ Your business, as far as it depends on my statement, is not yet quite complete. I am sorry for it, but I have done my best ; and I have left such instructions, as I hope will turn to the best account what I have been able to do. If I die, you will hear through one of my friends how the matter stands ; at present, I can add no more, than that I am, My dear Father Tom, Most affectionately yours, F, Lucas.” FREDEEICK LUCAS/ 12a The above requires no comment. Every line, every word, attests the courage and honesty of the writer, and no true man, however much lamenting his religious or political opinions, will refuse to pay him the homage of personal admiration and respect. A few days later, Lucas received the following letter (which, like the preceding one, was published after his death) from a great dignitary of his own Church. As he had often differed from the prelate in question, and on more than one occasion had openly opposed his views, both the act and the manner of writing are creditable to that eminent person, and must have been gratifying to the sufferer even at this crisis. “Leyton, October 12th, 1855. “ Dear Mr. Lucas, “It was my sincere desire to call upon you, and enquire in person after your valuable health, but Dr. Whitty assures me of what I feared, that my visit would be over-exciting at a time when quiet is indispensable. I must, therefore, content myself with conveying to you in writing my warmest sympathy and anxiety for your recovery, and assuring you of my fervent prayers to God for this mercy, if not for your own sake, for that of the Catholic interests, and the general welfare. “At the same time, I am sure, that your own earnest 124 FREDERICK LUCAS. wish is that God’s will may he accomplished in you, and I pray Him earnestly to give you grace, to he in all things conformable to it, and prepared for it. In this spirit, I wish you and yours every blessing, and am ever Your affectionate servant in Christ, H. Cardinal Wiseman.” But Lucas was fast going, where no voice of human praise or pity could reach him more. He lingered on till the 22nd of October, attending to the offices of his religion, sending kind messages to his friends and family, arranging his private affairs, and exhibiting the same serene and heroic constancy in all things. But he grew weaker and weaker, and, on the afternoon of the above day, he was seized with a sudden faintness, and she, who never left him, saw a great change in his countenance. The usual reme- dies were tried in vain, yet he joined mentally in some of the short prayers of his Church, and, with a sign that he understood and appreciated them, he gave up his soul calmly and peacefully into the hands of his Maker. He was in the forty-fourth year of his age, and in the seventeenth of his con- version to Catholicism. The news of his death spread rapidly through the United Kingdom, and was felt as an overwhelming FEEDEEICK LUCAS. 125 blow by the main body of his co-religionists. They had indeed no second such man ; and though, in life, he had been regarded by some of them with jealousy or distrust, they were all now forced to acknowledge, that a great light had been quenched in their Israel. The whole Catholic press, and many Protestant journals, united in deploring the event, and in doing justice to the talents and character of the deceased politician. More especially, the warm and impres- sionable Irish nature was deeply affected by the loss of so true a champion, and many a meeting was held in his honour, and many a mass offered up for the repose of his soul. Meanwhile, in England, his funeral was strictly private — such as would have been most in accordance with his own modest and simple taste. The body was first removed to the Oratory at Brompton, and thence to the West London Cemetery, where it was interred by the side of his first-born child. A few priests and choristers, his father, his brothers, and his little boy, one or two Catholic, and one or two old Protestant friends, were all that assembled around his grave on that melan- choly occasion. A plain tomb-stone marks the spot, inscribed with his name, the date of his birth and death, .and the good, old, pious legend : Requiescat in Face. 126 FEEDERICK LUCAS. Nearly seven years have now elapsed, since he was laid in his last resting-place, and, with the exception of the notices in the journals at the time, I am not aware, that any record has appeared of his life. Yet certainly he was a man of no common mould, and exercised no small influence on his Church and party, and in an age, when every zealous parson or pious soldier has ,his biographer, one would have thought, that this devoted champion of Catholicism would not have been left without some memorial. It remains for me, a Protestant, to pay this last tribute to his memory, and, if I am not so well .acquainted as some of his Catholic friends would be, with many of the circumstances in the latter part of his career, I have at least the advantage of having known him longer and earlier, and so perhaps am able to take a wider view aily News. 6 Messrs. Bell and Baddy’s W^z mtime ©tiition of tt)z ^oets. The Publishers have been induced, by the scarcity and increas- ing value of this admired Series of the Poets, to prepare a New Edition, very carefully corrected, and improved by such additions as recent literary research has placed within their reach. The general principle of Editing which has been adopted is to give the entire Poems of each author in strict conformity with the Edition which received his final revision, to prefix a Memoir, and to add such notes as may he necessary to elucidate the sense of obsolete words or ex- plain obscure allusions. Each author will be placed in the hands of a competent editor specially acquainted with the literature and bibliography of the period. Externally this new edition will resemble the former, but with some improvements. It will be elegantly printed by Whitting- ham, on toned paper manufactured expressly for it ; and a highly- finished portrait of each author wiU be given. The Aldine Edition of the Eritish Poets has hitherto been the favourite Series with the admirers of choice books, and every effort will be made to increase its claims as a comprehensive and faithful mirror of the poetic genius of the nation. KENSIDE’S Poetical Works, with Memoir by the Eev. A. Dyce, and additional Letters, carefully revised. 5s. Mo- rocco, or antique morocco, 10s. 6c?. Collins’s Poems, with Memoir and Notes by W. Moy Thomas, Esq. 3s. 6c?. Morocco, or antique morocco, 8s. 6c?. Gray’s Poetical Works, with Notes and Memoir by the Eev, . John Mitford. 5s. Morocco, or antique morocco, 10s. 6c?. Kirke White’s Poems, with Memoir by Sir H. Nicolas, and addi- tional notes. Carefully revised. 5s. Morocco, or antique morocco, 10s. 6c?. Shakespeare’s Poems, with Memoir by the Eev. A. Dyce. 5s. Morocco, or antique morocco, 10s. 6c?. Young’s Poems, with Memoir by the Eev. John Mitford, and additional Poems. 2 vols. 10s. Morocco, or antique morocco, 1?. Is. Thomson’s Poems, with Memoir by Sir H. Nicolas, annotated by Peter Cunningham, Esq., F.S.A., and additional Poems, carefully revised. 2 vols. 10s. Morocco, or antique morocco, 1?. Is. Thomson’s Seasons, and Castle of Indolence, with Memoir. 6s. Morocco, or antique morocco, 11s. 6c?. Dryden’s Poetical Works, with Memoir by the Eev. E. Hooper. F.S.A. Carefully revised. [/a the Press. Cowper’s Poetical Works, including his Translations. Edited, with Memoir, by John Bruce, Esq., F.S.A. [Preparing. New and Standard Puhlieations. 1 Uniform with the Aldine Edition of the Poets. The Works of Gray, edited by the Eev. John Mitford. With his Correspondence "with Mr. Chute and others, Journal kept at Rome, Criticism on the Sculptures, &c. New Edition. 5 vols. IZ. 5s. The Temple and other Poems. By George Herbert, with Cole- ridge’s Notes. New Edition. 5s. Morocco, antique calf or morocco, 10s. 6d. Vaughan’s Sacred Poems and Pious Ejaculations, with Memoir by the Rev. H. P. Lyte. Neio Edition, 5s. Antique calf or'morocco, 10s. 5d. Large Paper, 7s. 5d. Antique calf, 14s. Antique morocco, 15s. “ Preserving all the piety of George Herbert, they have less of his quaint and fantastic turns, with a much larger infusion of poetic feeling and expression.” — Lyte. Bishop J eremy Taylor’s Eule and Exercises of Holy Living and Holy D)dng. 2 vols. 2s. 5d. each. Morocco, antique calf or morocco, 7s. 5d. each. In one volume, 5s. Morocco, antique calf or morocco, 10s. 6rf. Bishop Butler’s Analogy of Eeligion ; with Analytical Introduc- tion and copious Index, by the Rev. Dr. Steere. 6s. Antique calf, 11s. 5d, Bishop Butler’s Sermons and Eemains: with Memoir, by the Eev. E. Steere, LL.D. 6s. •** This volume contains some additional remains, which are copyright, and render it the most complete edition extant. Bishop Butler’s Complete Works 5 with Memoir by the Eev. Dr. Steere. 2 vols. 12s. Bacon’s Advancement of Learning. Edited, with short Notes by the Rev. G. W. Kitchin, M.A., Christ Church, Oxford. 6s. : antique calf, 11s. 5d. Bacon’s Essays ; or. Counsels Civil and Moral, vvith the Wisdom of the Ancients. With References and Notes by S. W. Singer, P.S.A. 5s. Morocco, or antique calf, 10s. Syllables. Forming the sequel to “ Very Little Tales.” New Edition. Illustrated. 2 vols. 16mo. Is; 6d. each, or in I vol. 3s. The White Lady and Undine, translated from the German by the Hon. C. L. Lyttelton. With numerous Illustrations. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. Or, separately, 2s. 6d. each. The Lights of the Will o’ the Wisp. Translated by Lady Maxwell Wallace. With a coloured Frontispiece. Imperial 16mo. Cloth, gilt edges, 5s. Voices from the Greenwood. Adapted from the Original. By Lady Maxwell Wallace. With Illustrations. Imperial 16mo. 2s. 6d. Princess Use : a Legend, translated from the German. By Lady Maxwell Wallace. With Illustrations. Imperial 16mo. 2s. 6d. A Poetry Book for Children. Illustrated with Thirty-seven highly-finished Engravings, by C. W. Cope, R. A., Helmsley, Palmer, Skill, Thomas, and H. Weir. New Edition. Crown 8vo. 2*. 6d. New and Standard Publications. 11 picture 93oofe Series* Written expressly for Young People, super-royal 16mo. Cloth, gilt edges, price 5s. each. IBLE Picture Book. Eighty Illustrations. (Coloured, 9s.) Scripture Parables and Bible Miracles. Thirty -two Illustrations. (Coloured, 7s. 6(7.) English History. Sixty Illustrations. (Coloured, 9s.) Good and Great Men. Fifty Illustrations. (Coloured, 9s.) Useful Knowledge. One Hundred and Thirty Illustrations. Cloth, red edges, price 2s. &d, each. (^Coloured, gilt edges, 3s. 6d.) Scripture Parables. By the Eev. J. Erskine Clarke. Sixteen Illustrations. Bible Miracles. By the Eev. J. Erskine Clarke, M.A. Sixteen Illustrations. The Life of Joseph. Sixteen Illustrations. Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress. Sixteen Illustrations. LAEK’S Introduction to Heraldry. — Containing Eules for Blazoning and Marshalling Coats of Armour — Dictionary of Terms — Orders of Knighthood explained — Degrees of the Nobility and Gentry — Tables of Precedency ; 48 Engravings, including upwards of 1,000 Examples, and the Arms of nu- merous Families. Sixteenth Edition improved. Small 8vo. 7s. Cd. Co- loured, 18s. Book of Family Crests and Mottoes, with Four Thousand Engrav- ings of the Crests of the Peers, Baronets, and Gentry of England and 'W’ales, and Scotland and Ireland. A Dictionary of Mottos, &c. Ninth Edition, enlarged. 2 vols. small 8vo. 17. Is. “ Perhaps the best recommendation to its utility and correctness (in the main) is, that it has been used as a work of reference in the Herald* College. No wonder it sells.” — Spectator. Book of Mottoes, used by the Nobility, Gentry, &c. with Trans- lations, &c. New Edition, enlarged. Small 8vo. cloth gilt, 2s. Cd. A Handbook of Mottoes borne by the Nobility, Gentry, Cities, Public Companies, &c. Translated and Illustrated, with Notes and Quotations, by C. N. Elvin, M.A. Small 8vo. 6s. Gothic Ornaments ; being a Series of Examples of enriched De- tails and Accessories of the Architecture of Great Britain. Drawn from existing Authorities. By J. K. Colling, Architect. Eoyal 4to. Vol. I. S7. 13s. 6(7. Vol. II. 37. 16s. 6(7. 12 Messrs. Bell and Daddy's Details of Gothic Architecture, Measured and Drawn from existing Examples. By J. K. Colling, Architect. Koyal 4to. 2 vols. hi. hs. The Architectural History of Chichester Cathedral, with an In- troductory Essay on the Fall of the Tower and Spire. By the Kev. R. Willis, M.A., F.R.S., &c., Jacksonian Professor in the University of Cambridge. — Of Boxgrove Priory, by the Rev. J. L. Petit, M.A., F.S.A. — And of Shoreham Collegiate Church, together with the Collective Archi- tectural History of the foregoing buildings, as indicated by their mould- ings, by Edmund Sharpe, M.A., F.R.I.B.A. Illustrated by one hundred Plates, Diagrams, Plans and Woodcuts. Super-royal 4to. 1/. 10s. Architectural Studies in France. By the Kev. J. L. Petit, M.A., F.S.A. With Illustrations from Drawings by the Author and P. H. Delamotte. Imp. 8vo. 21. 2s. Remarks on Church Architecture. With Illustrations. By the Rev. J. L. Petit, M.A. 2 vols. 8vo. 11. Is. Lectures on Church Building ; with some Practical Remarks on Bells and Clocks. By E. B. Denison, M.A. Second Edition. Rewritten and enlarged ; with Illustrations. Crown 8vo. Is. 6d. A Few Notes on the Temple Organ. By Edmund Macrory, M.A. Second Edition. Super-royal 16mo. Half morocco, Roxburgh, 3s. 6d. Scudamore Organs, or Practical Hints respecting Organs for Vil- lage Churches and small Chancels, on improved principles. By the Rev. John Baron, M.A., Rector of Upton Scudamore, Wilts. With Designs by George Edmund Street, F.S.A. Second Edition, revised and enlarged. 8vo. 6s. Memoirs of Musick. By the Hon. Roger North, Attorney- General to James II. Now first printed from the original MS., and ed- ited, with copious Notes, by Dr. E. F. Rimbault. Pcap. 4to. half mo- rocco, 11. 10s. The Bell; its Origin, History, and Uses. By Rev. A. Gatty. 3s. Practical Remarks on Belfries and Ringers. By the Rev. H. T. Ellacombe, M.A., F. A.S., Rector of Clyst St. George, Devonshire. Second Edition, with an Appendix on Chiming. Illustrated. 8vo. 3s. Proceedings of the Archaeological Institute at Newcastle, in 1853, With Numerous Engravings. 2 vols. 8vo. 21. 2s. A Handboolt for Visitors to Cambridge. By Norris Deck. Illustrated by 8 Steel Engravings, 97 Woodcuts, and a Map. Crown 8vo. 5s. Canterbury in the Olden I'ime: from the Municipal Archives and other Sources. By John Brent, F.S.A. With Illustrations. 5s. Whirlwinds and Dust-Storms of India. With numerous Illustra- tions drawn from Nature, bound separately ; and an Addendum on Sani- tary Measures required for European Soldiers in India. By P. F. H. Baddeley, Surgeon, Bengal Army, Retired List. Large 8vo. With Illustrations, 8s. 6d. ; without Illustrations, 3s. Two Transparent Wind Cards in Horn, adapted to the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, for the use of Sailors, 2s. New and Standard Puhlications, 13 Tables of Interest, enlarged and Improved ; calculated at Five per Cent.; Showing at one view the Interest of any Sum, from £1 to £365 : they are also carried on by hundreds to £1,000, and by thousands to £10,000, from one day to 365 days. To which are added. Tables of Interest, from one to 12 months, and from two to 13 years. Also Tables for calculating Commission on Sales of Goods or Banking Accounts, from ^ to 5 per Cent., with several useful additions, among which are Tables for calculating Interest on large sums for 1 day, at the several rates of 4 and 5 per Cent, to £100,060,000. By Joseph King, of Liverpool. 2ith Edition. With a Table showing the number of days from any one day to any other day in the Year. 8vo. U. Is. EBSTER’S Complete Dictionary of the English Lan- guage. New Edition, revised and gi’eatly enlarged, by Chauncey a. Goodeich, Professor in Yale College. 4to. (1624 pp.) 1/. 11s. &d . ; half calf, 21 . ; calf, or half russia, 21. 2s. ; russia, 21. los. Though the circulation of Dr. Webster’s celebrated Dictionary, in its various forms, in the United States, in England, and in every country where the English Language is spoken, may be counted by hundreds of thousands, it is believed that there are many persons to whom the book is yet unknown, and who, if seeking for a Dictionary which should supply all reasonable wants, would be at a loss to select one from the numerous competitors in the field. In announcing this New Edition, the Proprietors desii’e to call attention to the features which distinguish it, and to put before those who are in want of such a book, the points in which it excels all other Dictionaries, and which render it the best that has as yet been issued for the practical purposes of daily use ; — 1. Accuracy of Definition. 2. Pronunciation intelligibly marked. 3. Completeness. 4. Etymology. 5. Obsolete Words. 6. Uniformity in the Mode of Spelling. 7. Quotations. 8. Cheapness. With the determination that the superiority of the work shall be fully maintained, and that it shall keep pace with the requirements of the age and the universal increase of education, the Proprietors have added to this New Edition, under the editorship of Professor Goodrich, — A Table of Synonyms. An Appendix of New Words. Table of Quota- tions, Words, Phrases, &c. EGENDS and Lyrics, by Adelaide Anne Procter. 6th Edition. Fcap. 5s. Antique or best plain morocco, lOs. 6d. Second Series. Second Edition. Ecap. 8vo. 5s. ; antique or best plain morocco, lOs. 6d. The Legend of the Golden Prayers, and other Poems. By C. F. Alexander, Author of “ Moral Songs,” &c. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. ; antique or best plain morocco, 10s. 6o!. Verses for Holy Seasons. By the Same Author. Edited by the Very Rev. W. F. Hook, D.D. ith Edition. Fcap. 3s. 6d . ; morocco, antique calf or morocco, 8s. 6d. Nightingale Valley ; a Collection of the Choicest Lyrics and Short Poems in the English Language. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. ; morocco, antique calf or morocco, 10s. 6d. Saul, a Dramatic Poem ; Elizabeth, an Historical Ode ; and other Poems. By William Fulford, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. 14 Messi's. Bell and BaMy’s Lays and Poems on Italy. By P. A. Mackay. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. Poems from the German. By Eichard Garnett, Author of “ lo in Egypt, and other Poems.” Fcap. 8v6. 3s. 6d. lo in Egypt, and other Poems. By E. Garnett. Pcap. 8vo. 5s. The Monks of Kilcrea, and other Poems. Third Edition. Post8vo. 7s. 6rf. Christopheros, and other Poems. By the Ven. W. B. Mant, Archdeacon of Down. Crown 8vo. 6s. Teuton. A Poem. By C. J. Eiethmiiller. Crown 8vo. 7s.M. Dryope, and other Poems. By T. Ashe. Pcap. 8vo. 6s. Poems. By Thomas Ashe. Pcap. 8vo. 5s. Day and Night Songs and The Music Master, a Love Poem. By William Allingham. With Nine Illustrations. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. 6d . ; morocco, 11s. Qd. Wild Thyme. By E. M. Mitchell. Pcap. 8vo. 5s. Lyrics and Idylls. By Gerda Pay. Pcap. 8vo. 4s. Pansies. By Panny Susan Wyvill. Pcap. 8vo. 5s. The Defence of Guenevere, and other Poems. By W. Morris. 5s. David Mallet’s Poems. With Notes and Illustrations by P. Dins- dale, LL.D., F.S.A. JVew Edition. Post 8vo. 10s. %d. Ballads and Songs of Yorkshire. Transcribed from private MSS., rare Broadsides, and scarce Publications; with Notes and a Glossary. By C. J. D. Ingledew, M.A., Ph.D., F.G.H.S., author of “ The History of North Allerton.” Fcap. 8vo. 6s. Passion Week. By the Editor of “ Christmas Tyde.” With 16 Illustrations from Albert Durer. Imp. 16mo. 7s. &d . ; antique morocco, 14s. Percy’s Eeliques of Ancient English Poetry. 3 vols. sm. 8vo. 15s. Half-bound, 18s. Antique calf, or morocco, 17. 11s. 6rf. Ellis’s Specimens of Early English Poetry . 3 vols. sm. 8vo. 1 5s. Half-bound, 18s. Antique calf, or morocco, 17. 11s. 6c7. The Book of Ancient Ballad Poetry of Great Britain, Historical, Traditional and Romantic : with Modern Imitations, Translations, Notes and Glossary, &c. Edited by J. S. Moore. New and Improved Edition, 8vo. Half-bound, 14s. Antique morocco, 21s. Shakespeare’s Tempest. With Illustrations by Birket Poster, Gustave Dore, Frederick Skill, Alfred Slader, and Gustave Janet. Crown 4to. Ornamental cloth, 10s. 6rf. Antique morocco elegant, 17. Is. The Promises of Jesus Christ. Illuminated by Albert H. Warren, Second Edition. Ornamental cloth, 15s. Antique morocco elegant, 21s. Christmas with the Poets : a Collection of English Poetry relating to the Festival of Christmas. Illustrated by Birket Foster, and with numerous initial letters and borders beautifully printed in gold and colours by Edmund Evans. New and improved Edition. Super royal 8vo. Ornamental binding, 21s. Antique morocco, 31s. 6c7. New and Standard Publications. 15 THENiE Cantabrigienses. By C. H. Cooper, E.S.A., and Thompson Cooper. Volume I. 1500 — 1585. 8vo. 18*. Vol. II. 1586—1609. 8vo. 18s. This work, in illustration of the biography of notable and eminent men who have been members of the University of Cambridge, comprehends notices of : — 1. Authors. 2. Cardinals, archbishops, bishops, abbots, heads of religious houses and other church dignitaries. 3. States- men, diplomatists, military and naval commanders. 4. Judges and emi- nent practitioners of the civil or common law. 5. Sufferers for religious or political opinions. 6. Persons distinguished for success in tuition. 7. Eminent physicians and medical practitioners. 8. Artists, musicians, and heralds. 9. Heads of colleges, professors, and principal ofiScers of the university. 10. Benefactors to the university and colleges, or to the public at large. The Early and Middle Ages of England. By C. H. Pearson, M.A., Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford, and Professor of Modern History, King’s College, London. 8vo. 12s. History of England, from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the End of the Reign of George II., by Hume and Smollett. With the Continua- tion, to the Accession of Queen Victoria, by the Rev. T. S. Hughes, B.D. late Canon of Peterborough. New Edition, containing Historical Illustra- tions, Autographs, and Portraits, copious Notes, and the Author’s last Corrections and Improvements. In 18 vols. crown 8vo. 4s. each. Vols. I. to VI. (Hume’s portion), If. 4s. Vols. VII. to X. (Smollett’s ditto), 16s. Vols. XI. to XVIII. (Hughes’s ditto), If. I2s. History of England, from the Accession of George HI. to the Accession of Queen Victoria. By the Rev. T. S. Hughes, B.D. New Edition, almost entirely re-written. In 7 vols. 8vo. 3f. 13s. 6d. Choice Notes from “ Notes and Queries,” by the Editor. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. each. Vol. I. — History. Vol. II. — Folk Lore. Master Wace’s Chronicle of the Conquest of England. Trans- lated from the Norman by Sir Alexander Malet, Bart., H.B.M. Pleni- potentiary, Frankfort. With Photograph Illustrations of the Bayeaux Tapestry. Medium 4to. Half-morocco, Roxburgh, 21. 2s. The Prince Consort’s Addresses on Different Public Occasions. Beautifully printed by Whittingham. 4to. 10s. 6(f. Life and Books ; or. Records of Thought and Reading. By J. F. Boyes, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. ; calf, 8s. Cd. Life’s Problems. Second Edition, revised and enlarged. Fcap. 5s. Parliamentary Short-Hand (Official System). By Thompson Cooper. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. Qd. This is the system universally practised hy the Government Official Re- porters. It has many advantages over the system ordinarily adopted, and has hitherto been inaccessible, except in a high-priced volume. Geology in the Garden: or. The Fossils in the Flint Pebbles. With 106 Illustotions. By the Rev. Henry Eley, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. 16 Messrs. BeU and Baldy’s The Pleasures of Literature. By R. Aris Willmott, Incumbent of Bear-Wood. Fifth Editicm, enlarged. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. Morocco, 10s. 6d. English Retraced ; or, Remarks, Critical and Philological, founded on a Comparison of the Breeches Bible with the English of the present day. Crown 8vo. 5s. A Popular Sketch of the Origin and Progress of the English Language. By the Bev. W. W. Skeat, M.A. 12mo. Is. 6d. Hints to Maid Servants in Small Households, on Manners, Dress, and Duties. By Mrs. Motherly. Fcap. 8vo. Is. M. A Wife’s Home Duties; containing Hints to inexperienced Housekeepers. Fcap. 8vo; 2s. M. Halcyon : or Rod-Eishing in Clear Waters. By Henry Wade, Secretary to the Weardale Angling Association. With Coloured repre- sentations of the principal Flies, and other Illustrations. Cr. 8vo. 7s. 6rf. SERMONS. ARISH SERMONS. By the Rev. M. F. Sadler, M. A., Vicar of Bridgwater. Author of the “ Sacrament of Eespon- sibility,” and “ The Second Adam and the New Birth.” Vol. I. Advent to Trinity. Fcap. 8vo. 7s. 6if. Twenty-four Sermons on Christian Doctrine and Practice, and on the Church, By C. J. Blomfield, D.D., late Lord Bishop of London. {Hitherto unpublished.') 8vo. 10s. Qd. King’s College Sermons. By the Rev. E. H. Plumptre, M.A., Divinity Professor. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. Sermons preached in Westminster. By the Rev. C. F. Secretan, M.A., Incumbent of Holy Trinity, Vauxhall-Bridge Road. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. Sermons. By the Rev. A. Gatty, D.D., Vicar of Ecclesfield. 12mo. 8s. Twenty Plain Sermons for Country Congregations and Family Reading. By the Rev. A. Gatty, D.D., Vicar of Ecclesfield. Fcap. 5s. Sermons to a Country Congregation — Advent to Trinity. By the Rev. Hastings Gordon, M. A. 12mo 6.s. Gospel Truths in Parochial Sermons for the Great Festivals. By the Rev. J. Townson, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6^f. The Bible and its Interpreters : being the Substance of Three Sermons preached in the Parish Church, St. Ann, Wandsworth. By- James Booth, LL.D., Vicar of Stone, Buckinghamshire. 8vo. 2s. 6rf. Four Sermons on the “ Comfortable Words” in the Office for the Holy Communion. By Alexander Goalen, B.A. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. The Prodigal Son. Sermons by W. R. Clark, M.A., Vicar of Taunton, S. Mary Magdalene. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. M. Parochial Sermons. By the Rev. D. G. Stacy, Vicar of Horn- church, Essex. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. New and Standard Publications. 17 Sermons Suggested by the Miracles of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. By the Very Bev. Dean Hook. 2 vols. Fcap. 8vo. 12s. rive Sermons Preached before the University of Oxford. By the Very Rev. W. F. Hook, D.D., Dean of Chichester. Third Edition. 3s. Plain Parochial Sermons. By the Rev. C. P. C. Pigott, B.A., late Curate of St. Michael’s, Handsworth. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. Our Privileges, Responsibilities, and Trials. By the Rev. E. Phillips, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. Sermons, chiefly Practical. By the Rev. T. Nunns, M.A. Edited by the Very Rev. W. F. Hook, D.D., Dean of Chichester. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. Sermons, Preached in the Parish Church of Godaiming, Surrey, by the Rev. E. J. Boyce, M.A., Vicar. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. Life in Christ. By the Rev. J. Llewellyn Davies, M.A., Rector of Christ Church, Marylebone. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. The Church of England ; its Constitution, Mission, and Trials. By the Rt. Rev. Bishop Broughton. Edited, with a Prefatory Memoir, by the Ven. Archdeacon Harrison. 8vo. 10s. 6rf. Plain Sermons, Addressed to a Country Congregation. By the late E. Blencowe, M.A. 1st and 3rd Series, fcap. 8vo. 7s. 6rf. each. Occasional Sermons. By a Member of the Church of England. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6if. Missionary Sermons preached at Hagley. Ecap. 3s. 6d. The Sufficiency of Christ. Sermons preached during the Reading Lenten Mission of 1860. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. Cd. Westminster Abbey Sermons for the Working 'Classes. Ecap. Authorized Edition. 1858. 2s. : 1859. 2s. 6rf. Sermons preached at St. Paul’s Cathedral. Authorized Edition. 1859. Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6d. AILY Readings for a Year, on the Life of Our Lord and Saviour J esus Christ. By the Rev. Peter Young, M.A. Second Edition, improved. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 11. Is. Antique calf, 1/. 16s. Morocco, Hayday, 21. A Commentary on the Gospels for the Sundays and other Holy Days of the Christian Year. By the Rev. W. Denton, A.M., Worcester College, Oxford, and Incumbent of St. Bartholomew’s, Cripplegate. 8vo. Vol. 1. Advent to Easter, 15s. Vol. II. Easter to the Sixteenth Sunday after Trinity, 14s. Lights of the Morning : or. Meditations for every Day in the Year. From the German of Frederic Arndt. With a Preface by the Rev. W. C. Magee, D.D. Fcap. 8vo. Advent to Whitsuntide, 5s. M. Trinity, 5s. &d. 18 Messrs. Bell and Baddy's Short Sunday Evening Readings, Selected and Abridged from various Authors by the Dowager Countess of Cawdor. In large type. 8vo. 5s. The Second Adam, and the New Birth ; or, the Doctrine of Bap- tism as contained in Holy Scripture. By the Rev. M. F. Sadler, M.A. Vicar of Bridgewater, Author of “ The Sacrament of Responsibility.” Third Edition, greatly enlarged. Fcap. 8vo. 4s. &d. The Sacrament of Responsibility ; or. Testimony of the Scripture to the teaching of the Church on Holy Baptism, with especial reference to the Cases of Infants, and Answers to Objections. Sixth Edition. 6d. Popular Illustrations of some Remarkable Events recorded in the Old Testament. By the Rev. J. F. Dawson, LL.B., Rector of Toynton. Post 8vo. 8s. M. The Acts and Writings of the Apostles. By C. Pickering Clarke, M. A., late Curate of Teddington. Post 8vo. Vol. I., with Map., 7s. 6^f. The Spirit of the Hebrew Poetry. By Isaac Taylor, Esq., Au- thor of “ The Natural History of Enthusiasm,” “ Ultimate Civilization,” &o. 8vo. 10s. 6o!. Civilization considered as a Science in Relation to its Essence, its Elements, and its End. By George Harris, F.S.A., of the Middle Temple, Barrister at Law, Author of “ The Life of Lord Chancellor Hardwicke.” 8vo. 12s. The Wisdom of the Son of David : an Exposition of the Eirst Nine Chapters of the Book of Proverbs. Fcap. 8vo. 6s. A Companion to the Authorized Version of the New Testament : being Explanatory Notes, together with Explanatory Observations and an Introduction. By the Rev. H. B. Hall, B. C. L. Second and cheaper Edition, revised and enlarged. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6rf. A History of the Church of England from the Accession of James II. to the Rise of the Bangorian Controversy in 1717. By the Rev. T. Debary, M.A. 8vo. 14s. A Treatise on Metaphysics in Connexion with Revealed Religion. By the Rev. J. H. MacMahon. 8vo. • 14s. Aids to Pastoral Visitation, selected and arranged by the Rev. H. B. Browning, M.A., Curate of St. George, Stamford. 8vo. 6s. A Popular Paraphrase of St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, with Notes. By the Rev. A. C. Bromehead, M.A. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6rf. Remarks on Certain Offices of the Church of England, popularly termed the Occasional Services. By the Rev. W. J. Dampier. 12mo. 5s. The Sympathy of Christ. Six Readings for the Sundays in Lent, or for the Days of the Holy Week. By the Rev. W. J. Dampier, M.A., Vicar of Coggeshall. Second Edition. 18mo. 2s. (d. On Party Spirit in the English Church. By the Rev. S, Robins. 12mo. 2s. 6d. New and Standard Publications. 19 Papers on Preaching and Public Speaking. By a Wykehamist. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. This volume is an enlargement and extension, with corrections, of the Papers which appeared in the “ Guardian ” in 1858-9. The Speaker at Home. Chapters on Public Speaking and Reading aloud, by the Rev. J. J. Halcombe, M.A., and on the Physiology of Speech, by W. H. Stone, M.A., M.B. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. The English Churchman’s Signal. By the Writer of “ A Plain Word to the Wise in Heart.” Fcap. 8vo. 2s. 6c(. A Plain Word to the Wise in Heart on our Duties at Church, and on our Prayer Book. Fourth Edition. Sewed, Is. 6cl. Register of Parishioners who have received Holy Confirmation. Arranged by William Fraser, B. C. L., Vicar of Alton. Oblong 4to. 7s. 6c?. ; 10s. &d. ; 12s. Readings on the Morning and Evening Prayer and the Litany. By J. S. Blunt. Second Edition, enlarged. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6«?. Confirmation. By J. S. Blunt, Author of “ Readings on the Morning and Evening Prayer,” &c. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. Od. Life after Confirmation. By the same Author. 18 mo. Is. Welchman on the Thirty -nine Articles of the Church of England, with Scriptural Proofs, &c. 18mo. 2s. or interleaved for Students, 3s. Bishop Jewel’s Apology for the Church of England, with his famous Epistle on the Council of Trent, and a Memoir. 32mo. 2s. The Book of Psalms (Prayer Book Version). With Short Head- ings and Explanatory Notes. By the Rev. Ernest Hawkins, B.D., Pre- bendary of St. Paul’s. Second and cheaper Edition, revised and enlarged, Fcap. 8vo., cloth limp, red edges, 2s. Qd. Family Prayers : — containing Psalms, Lessons, and Prayers, for every Morning and Evening in the Week. By the Rev. Ernest Hawkins, B.D., Prebendary of St. Paul’s. Eighth Edition. Fcap. 8vo. Is. ; sewed, 9c?. Household Prayers on Scriptural Subjects, for Four Weeks. With Forms for various occasions. By a Member of the Church of Eng- land. Second Edition, enlarged. 8vo. 4s. 6rf. Forms of Prayer adapted to each Day of the Week. For use in Families or Households. Bythe Rev. John Jebb,D.D., 8vo. 2s. 6c?. Walton’s Lives of Donne, Wotton, Hooker, Herbert, and San- derson. A New Edition, to which is now added a Memoir of Mr. Isaac Walton, by William Dowling, Esq. of the Inner Temple, Barrister-at- Law. With Illustrative Notes, numerous Portraits, and other Engrav- ings, Index, &c. Crown 8vo. 10s. 6c?. Calf antique, 15s. Morocco, 18s. The Life of Martin Luther. By H. Worsley, M. A., Rector of . Easton, Suffolk. 2 vols. 8vo. 1?. 4s. 20 Messrs. Bell and Baldy’s The Church Hymnal, (with or without Psalms.) 12mo. Large Type, Is. 6rf. 18mo. Is. 32mo. for Parochial Schools, 6(/. This book is now in use in every English Diocese, and is the Authorized Book in some of the Colonial Dioceses. Three Lectures on Archbishop Cranmer. By the Kev. C. J. Burton, M.A., Chancellor of Carlisle. 12mo. 3s. Church Reading ; according to the method advised by Thoma.s Sheridan. By the Rev. J. J. Halcoiabe, M.A. 8vo. 3s. M. The Kafir, the Hottentot, and the Prontier Parmer. Passages of Missionary Life from the Journals of the Ven. Archdeacon Merriman. Illustrated. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. Lectures on the Tinnevelly Missions. By the Rev. Dr. Caldwell, of Edeyenkoody. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6rf. The “ Cruise of the Beacon.” A Narrative of a Visit to the Islands in Bass’s Straits. By the Eight Rev. the Bishop of Tasmania. With Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 5s. \* Messrs. Bell and Daldy are agents for all the other Publications of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts. The Sweet Psalmist of Israel ; or, the Life of David, King of Israel ; illustrated by his own Psalms, newly versified in various metres. By the Rev. William Shepherd, B.D. Fcap. 8vo. 5s. Giles Witherne ; or, The Reward of Disobedience. A Village Tale for the Young. By the Rev. J. P. Parkinson, D. C.L. Sixth Edition. 6d. The Disorderly Pamily ; or, the Village of R * * * *. A Tale for Young Persons. In Two Parts. By a Father. 6d . ; Cloth, gilt edges, Is. By the Rev. J. Erskine Clarke, of Derby, EART Music, for the Hearth-Ring ; the Street-Walk ; the Country Stroll; the Work-Hours; the Rest-Day; the Trouble-Time. New Edition. Is. paper; Is. fid. cloth limp. The Giant’s Arrows. A Book for the Children of Working People. Ifimo. fid. ; cloth. Is. Children at Church. Twelve Simple Sermons. 2 vols. Is. each ; Is. fid. cloth, gilt ; or together in 1 vol. cloth gilt, 2s. fid. Little Lectures for Little Polk. 16mo. Is. Plain Papers on the Social Economy of the People. Pcap. 8vo. 2s. fid. No. 1. Recreations of the People. — No. 2. Penny Banks. — No. 3. La- bourers’ Clubs and Working Men’s Refreshment Rooms. — No. 4. Children of the People, fid. each. New and Standard Publications. 21 Bebottonal Hibrarg* Edited by the Very Eer. W.F. Hook, D.D., Dean of Chichester. A Series of Works, original or selected from well-known Church of Eng- land Divines, published at the lowest price, and suitable, from their practical character and cheapness, for Parochial distribution. HOET Meditations for Every Day in the Year. 2 vols. (1260 pages,) 32mo. Cloth, 5s. ; calf, gilt edges, 9s. Calf antique, 12s. In Separate Parts. ADVENT to LENT, cloth. Is. ; limp calf, gilt edges, 2s. M. ; LENT, cloth, 9a!. : calf. 2s. Sd. EASTEK. cloth. 9d. ; calf, 2s. 3d. TRI- NITY, Part I. Is.; calf, 2s. 6d. TRINITY, Part II. Is.; calf, 2s. 6d. Large Paper Edition, 4 vols. fcap. 8vo. large type. 14s. • Morocco, 30s. The Christian taught by the Church’s Services. (490 pages), royal 32mo. Cloth, 2s. 6d. ; calf, gilt edges, 4s. 6if. Calf antique, 6s. In Separate Parts. ADVENT TO TRINITY, cloth. Is. ; limp calf, gilt edges, 2s. 6rf. TRI- NITY, cloth, %d. ; calf, 2s. 9d. MINOR FESTIVALS, M . ; calf, 2s. 2d. Large Paper Edition, Fcap. 8vo. large type. 6s. &d. Calf antique, or morocco, 11s. Cd. J)evotions for Domestic Use. 32mo. cloth, 2s. ; calf, gilt edges, 4s. Calf antique, 5s. 6d. Containing : — The Common Prayer Book the best Companion in the Family as well as in the Temple. 3d. Litanies for Domestic Use, 2d. Family Prayers ; or. Morning and Evening Services for every Day in the Week. By the Bishop of Salisbury ; cloth, 6d. ; calf, 2s. Bishop Hall’s Sacred Aphorisms. Selected and arranged with the Texts to which they refer. By the Rev. R. B. Exton, M.A. ; cloth, 9d. \* These are arranged together as being suitable for Domestic Use ; but they may be had separately at the prices affixed. Aids to a Holy Life. First Series. 32mo. Cloth, Is. 6d. ; calf, gilt edges, 3s. 6d. Calf antique, 5s. Containing : — Prayers for the Young. By Dr. Hook, jrf. Pastoral Address to a Young Communicant. By Dr. Hook, frf. Helps to Self-Examination. By W. F. Hook, D.D., ^d. Directions for Spending One Day Well. By Archbishop Synge, ^d. Rules for the Conduct of Human Life. By Archbishop Synge, la!. The Sum of Christianity, wherein a short and plain Account is given of the Christian Faith ; Christian’s Duty ; Christian Prayer; Chris- tian Sacrament. By C. Ellis, Id. Ejaculatory Prayer; or, the Duty of Offering up Short Prayers to God on all Occasions. By R. Cook. 2d. Prayers for a Week. Fi'om J. Sorocold, 2d. Companion to the Altar; being Prayers, Thanksgivings, and Medita- tions. Edited by Dr. Hook. Cloth, Cid. * * Any of the above may be had for distribution at the prices affixed ; they are arranged together as being suitable for Young Persons and for Pri- vate Devotion. 22 Messrs. Bell and Baddy’s The Devotional Library continued. Aids to a Holy Life. Second Series. 32mo, Cloth, 2s. ; calf, gilt edges, 4s. Calf antique, 5s. 6rf. Containing : — Holy Thoughts and Prayers, arranged for Daily Use on each Day in the Week, M. The Retired Christian exercised on Divine Thoughts and Heavenly Meditations. By Bishop Ken. Zd. Penitential Reflections for the Holy Season of Lent, and other Days of Pasting and Abstinence during the Year. 6rf. The Crucified Jesus; a Devotional Commentary on the XXII and XXIII Chapters of St. Luke. By A. Horneck, D.D. Zd. Short Reflections for every Morning and Evening during the Week. By N. Spinckes, 2c!. The Sick Man Visited; or. Meditations and Prayers for the Sick Room. By N. Spinckes, 3(f. *„* These are arranged together as being suitable for Private Meditation and Prayer ; they may be had separately at the prices affixed. Helps to Daily Devotion. 32mo. Cloth, 8d. Containing : — The Sum of Christianity, Ic!. Directions for spending One Day Well, Helps to Self-Examination, Short Reflections for Morning and Evening, 2d. Prayers for a Week, 2d. The History of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; in Three Parts, with suitable Meditations and Prayers. By W. Reading, M.A. 32mo. Cloth, 2s. ; calf, gilt edges, 4s. Calf antique, 5s. 6c!. Hall’s Sacred Aphorisms. Selected and arranged with the Texts to which they refer, by the Rev. R. B. Exton, M.A. 32mo. cloth, 9o!. ; limp calf, gilt edges, 2s. Zd. Devout Musings on the Book of Psalms. 2 vols. 32mo. Cloth, 5s. ; calf, gilt edges, 9s. ; calf antique, 12s. Or, in four parts, price Is. eftch ; limp calf, gilt edges, 2s. 6c!. The Church Sunday School Hymn Book. 32mo. cloth, 8d. ; calf, gilt edges, 2s. id. %* A Large Paper Edition for Prizes, &c. Is. 6rf. ; calf, gilt edges, 3s. 6rf. HOET Meditations for Every Day in the Year. Edited by the Very Rev. W. F. Hook, D.D. New Edition. 4 vols. fcap. 8vo., large type, 14s. ; morocco, 30s. The Christian taught by the Church’s Services. Edited by the Very Rev. W. F. Hook, D. D. New Edition, fcap. 8vo. large type, 6s. 6rf. Antique calf, or morocco, Hs. Sd. Holy Thoughts and Prayers, arranged for Daily Use on each Day of the Week, according to the stated Hours of Prayer. Fifth Edition, with additions. 16mo. Cloth, red edges, 2s. ; calf, gilt edges, 3s. A Companion to the Altar. Being Prayers, Thanksgivings, and Meditations, and the Office of the Holy Communion. Edited by the Very Rev. W. F. Hook, D. D. Second Edition. Handsomely printed in red and black. 32mo. Cloth, red edges, 2s. Morocco, 3s. 6(f. The Church Sunday School Hymn Book. Edited by W. E. Hook, D.D. Large paper. Cloth, Is. 6c!. ; calf, gilt edges, 3s. Zd. For cheap editions of the above Five Books, see List of the Devotional Library. New and Standard Publications. 23 EDUCATIONAL BOOKS. Ollagstca. A Series of Greek and Latin Authors. With English Notes. 8vo. Edited by various Scholars, under the direction of G. Long, Esq., M.A., Classical Lecturer of Brighton College : and the late Kev. A. J. Macleane, M.A., Head Master of King Edward’s School, Bath. ESCHYLUS. By F. A. Paley, M.A. I8s. Cicero’s Orations. Edited by G. Long, M.A. 4 vols. Vol. I. 16s.; Vol. II. 14s; Vol. III. 16s.; Vol. IV. 18s. Demosthenes. By R. Whiston, M. A., Head Master of Rochester Grammar School. Vol. I. 16s. Vol. II. preparinff. Euripides. By F. A. Paley, M.A. 3 vols. 16s. each. Herodotus. By J. W. Blakesley, B.D., late Fellow and Tutor of Trinity College, Cambridge. 2 vols. S2s. Hesiod, By F. A. Paley, M. A. 10s. 6d. Horace. By A. J. Macleane, M.A. 18s. Juvenal and Persius. By A, J. Macleane, M.A. 14s. Sophocles. ByF. H. Blaydes, M.A. Vol. 1. 18s. prepating. Terence. By E. St. J. Parry, M.A., Balliol College, Oxford. 18s. Virgil. By J. Conington, M.A., Professor of Latin at Oxford. Vol. I. containing the Bucolics and Georgies. 12s. Vol. II. in the press. Plato. By W. H. Thompson, M.A. Vol. I. [Preparing. 0rammar?Sc]^ool