Knighthood o4ncient AND Modern BY FATHER JOHN B. DE VILLE “A glorious company, the flower of men, To serve as model for the mighty world, And he the fair beginning of a time.” BOSTON COLLEGE UDTIMiY OUKSTJKUT IIILL, MASS, ' J&13: 1 > “Our Sunday Visitor Press’^ Huntington, I-\dia aa Nihil Obstat RT. REV. MON. OECHTERING, V. G. Censor IMPRIMATUR ^ HERMAN J. ALERDING Bishop of Fort Wayne VIS | S3 %. 21542 Ifriiuti'is J. A. FLAHERTY, Supreme Knight HON. CABOT WARD, Dist. Dep. N. Y. This short sketch on “Knighthood” by Father de Ville should find a welcome with the Knights of Columbus. It is a brief historical presentation of Knighthood and contains some very practical sug¬ gestions for Knights of the present day. The historical side is enlightening and will undoubtedly awaken in the Knights of Columbus a desire to meet the dignity of Knighthood. The idea of service—service to a worthy cause which is the characteristic of Knighthood has probably never before had a more varied or larger field of opera¬ tion. Just what this field is and how it ought to appeal to the Knights of Columbus is set forth with interest in this brochure. A clear understanding of a duty is often a duty half done and when to that understanding . you add the energy, loyalty and quality that the Knights of Columbus are known to possess, it is within reason to say that the call of Knighthood-service—will find a fitting response. A large circulation of this pamphlet of Father de Ville on Knighthood will be a just appreciation of his interest in the cause and will bring its reward in the form of increased devotion to the ideals of the Knights of Columbus. MATTHEW SCHUMACHER, C. S. C. Director of Studies Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Indiana. State Chaplain of K. of C., State of Indiana. 4 KNIGHTHOOD. Some time ago there appeared in the pages of the Menace and kindred anti-Catholic publications, a bogus “Oath” purported to be taken by the Knights of Colum¬ bus. Here below is a copy of the document which is as foolish as it is false. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS OATH. “I, ., now in the presence of -Almighty God, the blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the Saints, sacred Host of Heaven, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the III, and con¬ tinued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that his Holiness, the Pope, is Christ’s vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by the virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments and they may be safely destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power, I will defend this doctrine and his Holiness’ right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Ger¬ many, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same, now established in Ireland, and on the continent of America and elsewhere and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. “I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state, named Protestant or Lib¬ erals or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers. “I do further declare that the doctrine of the Churches of England and Scotland of the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name of Protestants or Masons, to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same. “I do further declare, that I will help, assist and advise KNIGHTHOOD. 5 all or any of his Holiness’ agents, in any place where I should be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Ireland or America or in any other kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or Masonic doc¬ trines, and to destroy their pretended powers, legal or other¬ wise. “I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding I am dispensed with to assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother Church’s interest; to keep secret and private all her agents’ counsels from time to time, as they entrust me, and not divulge directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstances whatever, but to execute all that should be proposed, given in charge, or discovered unto me, by you my Ghostly Father, or any of this sacred order. “I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own or any mental reservation what¬ soever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ. “That I will go to any part of the world whithersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions North, Jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsover is communicated to me. “I do further promise and declare that I will when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do, to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condi¬ tion, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants’ heads against the walls, in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same can not be done openly, I will secretly us© the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity or authority of the persons whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do, by any agents of the Pope, or) 6 KNIGHTHOOD. Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Father of thej Society of Jesus. “In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name, written in my blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever. “That I will in voting always vote for a K. of C. in pref¬ erence to a Protestant, especially a Mason and that I will leave my party so to do; that if two Catholics are on the ticket I will satisfy myself which is the better supporter of Mother Church and vote accordingly. “That I will not deal with or employ a Protestant if in my power to deal with or employ a Catholic. That I will place Catholic girls in Protestant families that a weekly re¬ port may be made of the inner movements of the heretics. “That I will provide myself with arms and ammunition that I may be in readiness when the word is passed, or I am commanded to defend the Church, either as an individual or with the militia of the Pope. All of which I, .. do swear by the blessed Trinity and blessed Sacrament which I am now to receive, to perform and on part to keep this, my oath. “In Testimony Hereof, I take this most holy and blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further, with my name written with the point of this dagger, dipped in my own blood, and seal, in the face of this holy Sacra¬ ment.” We of the Faith as well as many non-Catholics who are brought into constant and intimate contact with members of this organization are well aware of the absurdity of the above. It is deplorable that so many serious Protestant periodicals should have reproduced it. If the editors who are intelligent and cultivated can be deceived, for in all charity I take it for granted that KNIGHTHOOD. 1 they were deceived or else would not have given it to their readers, is it not logical to suppose that a great majority of their subscribers will also give it credence? It is not my purpose he^e to refute the slander. The high character of the Knights of Columbus as individ¬ uals and as members of the Order, the great and noble work by them performed in the interest of Church and State, is in itself an irrefragable refutation. The originators of the oath are merely putting into practice Voltaire’s famous axiom “Calomniez, quelquechose res- tera” (calumniate, something will remain). Yes, in spite of its grossness and patent falsity, some of its mud will stick and many are the Catholics and Protestants who express wonder at the silence of the Supreme Body of the K. of C. in this matter. The truth of the matter is that the Knights of Columbus take no oath but they do promise solemnly to live up to the ideals and teachings of the Order, ideals and teach¬ ings which are noble and exalting. True it is that secrecy is enjoined upon its members but not on account of having anything to hide, not on account of ulterior motives of which they need be ashamed. To ventilate the affairs of one’s family in public is to lay its members open to ridicule, unjust criticism, perhaps, and what is the Order of the K. of C. but one great, loving family ? There is no Society that does not warn its members against discussing its business outside their meeting-room, knowing full well that to allow such a thing would be equivalent to revealing a lack of prudence and solidarity, thus lessening its efficiency. The object of this brief treatise is to remind the Knights that true Knighthood can only draw its inspir¬ ation and strength from Holy Mother Church; to warn them of the dangers with which the road to future 8 ICNIGHTHOOi). success is strewn; and to impress upon them the fact that Knighthood entails obligations which must be complied with, burdens which must be cheerfully borne. “To ride abroad redressing human wrongs, To speak no slander, no, nor listen to it; To lead sweet lives in purest chastity.” KNIGHTHOOD ITS ORIGIN. “Wonderful and strange it is to see them, at once as gentle as lambs and as bold as lions. I hardly know whether to call them monks or Knights—wanting as they do neither the meekness of the monk nor the courage of the Knight.— (St. Bernard.) In a general sense Knighthood is as old as humanity and represents the highest, purest and noblest aspirations of the human soul. In all periods of the world’s history, among people steeped in degrad¬ ation, surrounded by the most pernicious influences, there will always be gigantic figures towering in moral strength and fortitude above their fellows. They are the beacon-lights that illuminate the path of righteous¬ ness and show it to the multitudes that are groping in darkness and error. Thus we find the Knightly man omnipresent among the creations of the first masters of civilization, the ancient Hindus; we meet him among the heroes of Homer and Virgil. Traversing burning seas of sand in Africa, speeding across the Asiatic steppes on fiery steeds, worshipping in the sacred for¬ ests of Germany or Ireland, he is everywhere to be seen bent on some errand of mercy or of love. He is a man of ideals and a man of action. He soars high. Material, sordid things he despises and he keeps his gaze fixed upon the eternal truths. He may sing and dream at times but he knows that in order to reach the goal he must work and suffer, too. He intuitively understands his mission upon earth; hence he looks about for wrongs to right, tears to dry, sorrows to alleviate. He seems to be the instrument of Divine Providence, ubiquitous, proteiform in his activities 10 KNIGHTHOOD. and manifestations. Is his age selfish, brutal and cruel? In him you will find blended the spirit of sacrifice, gentleness and charity. Is rebellion to law and order rampant? Behold in the Knight the exemplar of obedience and duty. Have luxury and vice so mollified mankind as to render it weak and vacillating? The Knight becomes then the just but stern ruler, inflexible in his degmand for adherence to principles. Even among the ancient Scandinavians the chief duty of the Knight was to become the guardian of womanly purity, true love and home attachments. Virtue and valor were to be the passports to the Val¬ halla of heroes and the Gladsheim of heavenly joy. It was, however, Christianity that produced the best type of Knighthood, and gradually developed it into one of the greatest and most beneficent institutions of feudal times- The moral and aesthetic principles of the Christian Religion, its ideals of chastity, marriage, and loyalty, and in particular the wide-spread venera¬ tion paid to the Virgin Mother of Christ, powerfully contributed to the development of the institutions of chivalry. There are many pretty but merely legendary stories written between the years 1180 and 1240 con¬ cerning the exploits of Knights which, however, clearly show the high code of honor they followed, the noble motives by which they were actuated. The best known is that of the Holy Grail. The Holy Grail (vide Cath. Enc.) is supposed to be the dish from which Christ ate the Paschal Lamb with His disciples, which passed into the possession of Joseph of Arimathea, and was used by him to gather the Precious Blood of our Savior, when His Body was taken from the Cross. It becomes identified with the Chalice of the Eucharist. It is taken to Britain where it disappears. The KNIGHTHOOD. 11 Knights, replete with love and devotion for everything bearing relation to Christ, go in search of it. The quest of the Holy Grail is a difficult one, fraught with difficulties, and only the purest and bravest attain it. The famous stories of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table, Sir Galahad, Sir Percival and many others are woven around this subject. The most famous modern versions are Tennyson’s “Holy Grail” in the “Idylls of the King,” and Wagner’s music-drama, the festival-play “Parsifal,” produced for the first time at Bayreuth in 1882. THE CRUSADERS. Am ready to sail forth on one last voyage, And readier, if the King would hear, to lead One last crusade against the Saracen, And save the Holy Sepulchre from thrall. The golden age of chivalry was inaugurated by the Crusades. The Knight becomes invested with an almost sacred character and the Church takes him under her direct protection. In the 11th century an extraordinary man appears in Europe. Uncouth in appearance, a long beard framing his ascetic face, he nevertheless possesses such powers of oratory and per¬ suasion that, on account of him, an epoch-making movement is inaugurated, stamping East and West with the fires of war for centuries to come. His name was Peter the Hermit, and he had just returned from a long pilgrimage to the Holy Land. While there, he saw, with aching heart, the profanation of the sacred places atAhe hands of the Turks; he beheld the Chris¬ tians living there submitted to a thousand indignities, and he vowed that it would no longer be thus. “Is there no Faith left?” he exclaimed. “Has hope for the 12 KNIGHTHOOD. Savior died out of the heart of man?” “Is not the ground that He sanctified with His love property of His children?” “How long shall the Half Moon of the Prophet wave over it?” It must be snatched from the minarets, and Constantine’s labarum proclaim to the breezes that Christ alone reigns. “GOD WILLS IT, GOD WILLS IT!” Carrying a wooden Cross he travels from city to city, from hamlet to hamlet. “God wills it,” repeats the king; “God wills it,” cries the baron; “God wills it” echoes the vassal. Long standing feuds are for¬ gotten, prejudices vanish, racial differences are rele¬ gated to the back-ground and Frank, Saxon, Dane, Celt and Latin are made one by one great, common ideal. The flower of European youth, leaving home and friends, marches through unknown lands, braves all kinds of obstacles and engages in deadly combat with the “infidel.” It was then that chivalry received its baptism of fire. HOSPITALLERS AND TEMPLARS. Some were almost in their prime. Nor was a brow o’ercast. Seen as they sate Ranged round their ample hearth-stone in an hour Of rest, they were as gay and free from guile As children; answering, and at once, to all The gentler impulses, to pleasure, mirth; Mingling, at intervals, with rational talk, Music; and gathering news from them that came As of some other worlds. But when the storm Rose and the snow rolled on in ocean waves. When on his face tlT “experienced traveller fell,” Sheltering his lips and nostrils with his hands, Then all was changed, and sallying with their pack, Into that blank of nature, they became Unearthly beings. —ROGERS. KNIGHTHOOD. 13 Born of the Crusades were those unique Orders of famous Christian warriors, the Knights of St. John (or Knights Hospitallers) and the Poor Soldiers of Christ (or Knights Templars). Says John R. Fryar in the Ecclesiastical Review, Vol. XLYI, No. 46: “Never was given to the world a more deeply interesting his¬ tory than is embodied in the rise and achievements of these orders—of the picturesque amalgamation of the most opposite qualities of human nature required as the indispensable preliminary to membership, of the active bravery and passive fortitude with which the objects of the institutions were pursued. They were a combination of priest and soldier which powerfully appealed to the popular imagination. Both formed the flower of the Christian army and were the especial dread of the Saracen hosts. The military annals of no country or time exhibit deeds that can surpass, few even that can rival, the prodigies of valor continually performed by these warrior monks; bravery, chivalry, moral and military discipline were in them personified in a high degree; and not until later, when wealth and temporal power had been thrust upon them, was it that luxury, jealousy and corruption set in. Richard Coeur de Lion, St. Louis IX, Godfrey de Bouillon, Tancred and the Count de St. Gilles are some of their most famous heroes. The Hospitallers, or Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, had their origin about 1048, when a hospital was built in Jerusalem for the care of pil¬ grims to the Holy Sepulchre. After Godfrey de Bouil¬ lon had captured Jerusalem in the First Crusade, 1099, the hospital servants were joined by many Christian soldiers, and they were all banded into a religious order in 1113. Their especial vocation was to relieve the hungry, weary, homeless, and sick of their own 14 KNIGHTHOOD. faith, whom piety had brought to that far-off land. Their kindly offices were extended to the infidel Arab or Turk, when dire necessity brought him to their door. Hugh de Payens founded the Order of the Templars about the year 1120 with nine Knights, but the small band soon began to grow and acquire wealth and influence. They devoted themselves, life and fortune, to the defence of the high roads leading to Jerusalem, where the Christian pilgrims were continually harassed and injured by the warlike onslaughts of the Mussul¬ mans, and the predatory attacks of robbers. As a special honor they were lodged by the Church on the site of the great Hebrew Temple, and the fame of the •‘Knighthood of the Temple of Solomon” began to spread through Christian Europe. Within a short time the Hospitallers had become possessed of some 19,000 manors, and the Templars of almost 9,000 manors, in the fairest provinces of Christendom. Their material success was also the cause of their ruin. They grew lax, arrogant and envious. Instead of working harmoniously for the common cause they even turned their arms against each other, and the decline of Christian power in the Holy Land may be traced in no small measure, to those miserable jealousies. These Religious Military Orders originated at the end of the 11th century, and ceased to exist toward the close of the 18th century. They have left a halo around their memory, a picturesqueness about their history, a rev¬ erence for their aims and deeds. Glorious in the humility and sanctity of their inception, rapidly pow¬ erful and affluent in their progress, they were painfully pathetic in their fall. “The Knights are dust and their swords rust,” but they have bequeathed to posterity a great history, an ennobling example and remarkable KNIGHTHOOD. 15 remains. The Order of the Knights of Malta was a branch of the Hospitallers. Another Order which de¬ serves some mention is that of the Teutonic Knights (T'eutschritter) founded at Jerusalem in 1190. They observed the rule of St. Augustine with the exception of the knightly part which was borrowed from that of the Templars. They slept on straw pallets and those who were priests said Mass in armour and sword at the side. Candidates for the Order had to be Germans of noble birth. A split in the Order took place in 1525, when Albert of Brandenburg, the Grand Master, embraced the doctrine of Luther. The Catholic Knights met at Mergenteim in 1527, and elected a new Grand Master. It was abolished by Napoleon in 1809. Other celebrated Orders were those of Calatrava (1157), Santiago, and Alcantara (1212) in Spain. All these institutions, till they retrograded from their high principles and aims, were extremely charitable and used their vast wealth for the alleviation of suffering. TRAINING THE KNIGHTS. “Nay—but thou errest, Lancelot, never yet Could all of true and noble in knight and man Twine round one sin, whatever it might be, With such a closeness, but apart there grew. Save that he were the swine thou spakest of, Some root of knighthood and pure nobleness; Whereto see thou, that it may bear its flower.” Every Knight had to acquire skill in the use of arms, in riding and politeness. The weapons used were the lance for the encounter, and the sword for the close fight. For protection they also wore a coat of mail which was called the defensive weapon. They must possess three horses: one for the battle, called 16 KNIGHTHOOD. high horse; one for the journey, and a heavy one for luggage. The very word “chivalry” comes from the French “cheval,” (Latin “caballus”), a horse. Its equivalent “Knight-hood” is derived from the Anglo- Saxon “eniht,” youth, military attendant, and is akin to the German and Dutch “Knecht,” servant, and, per¬ haps, to the English “kin.” Each had several atten¬ dants of whom the principal one was the “squire,” or shield-bearer. The squire after serving his time, if worthy and proficient, could become a Knight. An¬ other integral part of knightly equipment was the square banner which was attached to and carried on the lance and bore the arms of the King or baron in command, and also the Knight’s personal ensign. Almost every ancient noble house of Europe had a Knight for its founder, hence it is evident that the social standing of the Knights was of the highest order. The nobility was recruited solely from its ranks. It must be observed, however, that Knighthood itself was not hereditary, though only the sons of a Knight were eligible to its ranks. These were sent, when seven years old, to some baron who undertook their training. The highest rank of chivalry, Knighthood, was conferred upon the candidate when 21 years of age. The cere¬ mony of “knighting” was at first very simple, but it gradually developed into a very elaborate one. After a vigil of prayer and fasting, the candidate received the Holy Sacraments, and then was invested with a white robe, symbolic of the purity which must adorn his soul. Renewing his baptismal vows first, he would swear allegiance to the Church, promise to protect widows and orphans, to live in harmony with his equals, never to lie or slander. Here is given the mili¬ tary oath. KNIGHTHOOD. 17 OATH OF KNIGHTHOOD. “In the presence of the Almighty God, and of His Son, Jesus Christ, the Lord, here present upon this altar, and of the Lady Mary, the Holy Mother of God, and of the good Knights St. Michael and St. George, and of all good Knights, the Angels and the Saints, and of those whose relics are here upon this altar; and trusting in the help of these, I do solemnly swear to serve loyally and truly, and to fight manfully for God, for Country, for the Ladies, and for all the weak and oppressed; in this cause and in defense of these, never to count the enemy. And as I keep this, my oath, sacred and true, and do this, my devoir, knightly and well, so may the Almighty God, in His mercy, grant me His grace, that my life may J)e without reproach, and my death with honor, in arms, upon the field of battle, and my place in eternal life with those whose aid I here invoke. The Roman Pontifical still retains the form of blessing for a new Knight (benedictio novi militis) and that for the imposition of the Cross. After the Cross was especially blessed, it was imposed upon the candidate, usually by the -Bishop, with these words: “Receive the sign of the Cross in the name of the Father, and of the Son of the Holy Ghost, in token of the Cross, Passion and Death of Christ for the defence of thy body and thy soul, that by the favor of Divine Goodness, when thy journey is accomplished, thou mayest return to thy family safe and reformed (salvus et emendatus).” After that the “accolade” or final degree took place. While he knelt, the godfather, who must be a Knight, gave him a slight blow on the neck with the 18 KNIGHTHOOD. flat of the sword in order to teach him that Knight¬ hood entailed obligations, and he was “dubbed” a Knight in the name of God and St. George, the patron of chivalry. ST. GEORGE. It may be of some interest here to state why St. George appealed so strongly to those warriors as to be chosen as their official protector. St. George was born of noble Christian parents and early in life joined the Roman army where he distinguished himself for his great bravery. Diocletian bestowed great honors upon him, creating him an officer- When the persecution broke out under this cruel Emperor, George laid aside his uniform and personally pleaded the cause of his coreligionists before his sovereign. He was immedi¬ ately cast into prison and soon after beheaded in Nicomedia, in the year of Our Lord 300. Two things rendered him popular among the Knights: his profes¬ sion, that of a soldier; and his martyrdom; his physical prowess and moral fortitude which were also the re¬ quisites of true Knighthood. The war-cry of feudal England was: “St. George and Merrie England” and the Red Cross banner of St. George is still inscribed on the Union Jack. The Greeks call him the “Great Martyr,” the Georgians take their name from him and Genoa honors him as a patron saint. It was in his honor that Edward III in 1344, on the day of his feast, insti¬ tuted the “Most noble Order of St. George or the Blue Garter.” “And now,” says Edmund Burke, “the age of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded, and the glory of Europe is extinguished forever. Never, never more, shall we behold that generous loy¬ alty to rank and sex, that proud submission, that KNIGHTHOOD. Iff dignified obedience, that subordination of heart which kept alive even in servitude itself the spirit of an exalted freedom; the unbought grace of life, the cheap defense of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment and heroic enterprise is gone. It is gone—that sensibility of principle, that chastity of honor, which felt a stain like a wound, which inspired courage while it miti¬ gated ferocity, which ennobled whatever it touched, and under which vice itself lost half its evil by losing all its grossness.” “How sad it were for Arthur, should he live. To sit once more within his lonely hall, And miss the wonted number of my Knights And miss to hear high talk of noble deeds, As in the golden days before thy sin.” CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS. Only the ghost of our great Catholic Queen Smiles on me, saying, “Be thou comforted! This creedless people will be brought to Christ And own the holy governance of Rome.” He stands alone, in a class all his own, this Chris¬ tian Knight of imperishable fame. He is the link of transition between ancient and modern Knighthood. Though the sword is by his side, though he takes part in adventurous expeditions on land and sea still we find him often lost in thought, his brow pluckered, his eyes roaming over a chart, his hands grasping mathe¬ matical instruments. The Crusades are over, and a new era of fruitful effort has commenced for Europe. Born in Genoa or vicinity in 1451, of good parents, Columbus’ early education for some reason or other had been neglected, and he became a mariner when only 16 years old. Very little is known of his life 20 KNIGHTHOOD. previous to his migration to Portugal. During the long voyages to Iceland and other regions he must have devoted all his spare time to the study of cosmo¬ graphy, astronomy, navigation, and kindred sciences, and must have become very proficient in them, if we are to judge from the events of his later life. Whether the idea of discovering the Far East by sailing west¬ ward was conceived by him or was suggested to him by his brother Bartholomew, a designer of geographical charts of no mean ability, is not certain; but this much is certain, that to carry it through became the sole purpose of his life. He travels from court to court, his faith undaunted by indifference or ridicule. His native land cannot help him, because it is torn by intestinal dissensions and constantly a prey to the invasion of foreign princes. Portugal turns a deaf ear to his en¬ treaties ; Spain is driving the Moors to their last stand; • and besides, the University of Salamanca was hostile to him; Henry VII of England considers him a vision¬ ary and Charles VIII, of France, is too much occupied with his Italian campaign to listen to him. Will he give up in despair? No, not Columbus. He feels that he is the man of Providence and that failure is, conse¬ quently, impossible. Mere chance leads him and his beloved son Fernando to the Dominican Convent of La Rabida, and there seeks a much needed rest. The Prior of La Rabida, Father Juan Perez, becomes his friend and adviser. Through him and other influential personages he finally obtains from Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand the sighed-for means for the equip¬ ment of his expedition. After having devoutly received the Sacraments and the blessing of the Church, he sails from Palos with the flagship Santa Maria and two caravels, the Nina and Pinta, carrying in all 120 men, KNIGHTHOOD. 21 for that memorable journey that will, a few months later, on Oct. 12, 1492, give to the world a new contin¬ ent and inscribe his name on the imperishable tablets of fame. For the sake of truth and impartiality it must be admitted that, in the light of present standards at least, Columbus was not without defects, but he certainly expiated these by his troubled life, the sorrows and injustices inflicted upon him by the ingratitude of former friends and beneficiaries, which culminated in his solitary, pathetic death at Valladolid, Spain, in 1506. Two great, principal motives actuated Colum¬ bus and informed his every action during the entire period preparatory to and embracing his discoveries: love for God and added glory and wealth for his adopted country. The discovery of an inhabited continent primarily meant for him that the light of Christ’s Gospel and its saving grace would be brought to millions of benighted people; secondarily, he exulted in the thought that the flag of Ferdinand, the Catholic, would wave over the new land, thus adding lustre and riches to the already powerful Kingdom of Spain. Pure, confiding, persistent faith, unaltered and unal¬ terable fidelity to God and His Church, disinterested, untiring efforts in behalf of the moral, intellectual and material weal of the Republic, these are the aims of the Knights of Columbus and therefore they could not choose a more appropriate and inspiring patron than the immortal Columbus. 22 KNIGHTHOOD. THE MODERN KNIGHT. Every day brought out a noble chance. And every chance brought out a noble Knight. The age of chivalry has not passed. It will last as long as man’s ideals last, as long as a benign Provi¬ dence will watch over the destinies of humanity. Its external forms of pageantry, institutions and methods must necessarily change with the changing of time and standards, but its animating principle is as eternal as the aspirations of the human soul. Just as the so- called “Dark Ages” needed a splendid body of men, clad in armor, strong of body and of heart, to check the lawlessness of the feudal social fabric, so society of today feels the imperious need of having in its midst a body of fearless, clean men; and why? Because its foundation is undermined, it begins to tremble upon its base, it hears the ominous rumbling of its various parts that speak of disintegration. We are not lacking in gold or silver, the materialistic anchors of progress. The arts are flourishing, commerce is expanding. Look at the monster sky-scrapers of our large cities. Like a new tower of Babel they raise their lofty metal columns to Heaven as if to defy it. Human ingenuity has reached its apogee and the elements contain few secrets that have not been unraveled, few forces indeed that have not been harnessed by the intelligence of this mighty Titan, man. Why, then, is there so much rest¬ lessness? Whence comes this fever of excitement that consumes us ? It is because self predominates and self gradually destroys character and lofty aspirations. People now-a-days are devoid of sentiment, and delight in cynicism. They are no longer capable of noble out¬ bursts of enthusiasm. Sacrifice, generosity and self- KNIGHTHOOD. 23 denial no longer appeal to man, who considers them merely as rhetorical words void of meaning. Is there any wonder then that the world is fearful with the fear of impending doom, and asks itself: “where is salvation?” The home is disrupted; the beautiful virtues of conjugal fidelity and forbearance are laughed at, and as a consequence, chastity leaves the souls and bodies of our children at an early age; parental authority is reduced to nil. When the family—the soul of society—is destroyed, what can you expect of the Nation? Unscrupulous politicians are sure to make the people their foot-stool for self-advancement, the integrity of the judiciary is lessened, plutocracy grows arrogant; while, on the other hand, the germ of discontent in the masses grows apace, and, under the leadership of violent demagogues, is bound to enkindle sooner or later the fires of revolt that with amazing rapidity will spread from coast to coast. “Where is Salvation?” The Catholic Church, the world’s im¬ mutable teacher and infallible guide, gives us the answer. “God wills,” she cries out to her children, “that you return to the simple truths of the Gospel, to the pure and holy doctrine of the Nazarene. In that doctrine you will find the panacea for all the ills of life, you will find the cravings, the aspirations of jour souls fully satisfied.” Her voice,, however, is not heeded, but instead false social theories, atheism, materialism and indifferentism have their cohorts ever ready to attack her, to slander her, to misrepresent her activities. She calls for volunteers and at the magic invocation of the old, yet ever-young Mother, drawing from her ever-fertile bosom treasures of vitality and inspiration, behold there is born a new order of Knights, who line up all around her, ready 24 KNIGHTHOOD to defend her and die for her if it needs be, as the Crusaders died. The society was conceived and organ¬ ized in New Haven, Conn., February 2, 1882, with Rev. M. J. McGivney, Rev. P. P. Lawlor, James T. Mullen, Cornelius T. Driscoll, Dr. M. C .O’Connor, Daniel Col¬ well, William M. Geary, John T. Kerrigan, Bartholo¬ mew Healey and Michael Curran as incorporators. The first subordinate Council was that of San Salvador, No. 1, New Haven, and the Order soon spread through¬ out the State of Connecticut. On April 15, 1885, the first Council outside the State was established at Westerley, R. I. The growth of the order was so rapid that in 1892, State Councils were first organized. The fourth degree was given for the first time in New York on February 22nd, 1900, and twelve hundred candi¬ dates from all parts of the United States received it. Now there are Councils in every State and Territory of the Union, in Canada, Newfoundland, the Philippine Islands, Porto Rico, Cuba, Panama and Mexico. It has a membership of nearly 260,000 and has paid to the beneficiaries of deceased members nearly four and a half million dollars. What they will accomplish in the future is merely a matter of conjecture, but the work done in the past is splendid, and comprises a long list of private and public benefactions. The K. of C. have established lecture bureaus throughout the land; they have borne the expense of missions for non-Catholics, provided education and homes for Cath¬ olic orphans, and endowed scholarships in Catholic Colleges. In 1909, the order gave $50,000 to the Cath¬ olic University of Washington for a chair of American History, and has now raised $500,000 more to endow fifty scholarships in the same University. Instead of hating non-Catholics, as the bogus oath contends, they KNIGHTHOOD. 25 strive to establish the most cordial relations with them, and in order to do away with blind prejudice and bigotry, they inaugurated a series of public lec¬ tures in various parts of the country. The series was opened in Denver (1900) by the El. Kev. Bishop J. J. Keane of Cheyenne, Wyoming. “It is a movement,” says Ed. Hearn in the Catholic Encyclopedia, “which does not aim at attacking any man’s belief, but at building up charity among men and bringing us all closer to God Almighty.” It was due to the tireless efforts of the K. of C. that the United States govern¬ ment erected a monument to Christopher Columbus, in the City of Washington, and that Columbus Day is at present observed in California, Colorado, Connecti¬ cut, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Khode Island. They will not rest until they have made it a national holiday. And God Hath more than glimmer’d on me. O my lord, I swear to you I heard his voice between The thunders in the black Veragua nights, “O soul of little faith, slow to believe! Have I not been about thee from thy birth? Given thee the keys of the great Ocean-sea? Set thee in light till time shall be no more? Is it I who have deceived thee or the world? Endure! thou hast done so well for men, that men Cry out against thee. Was it otherwise With mine own Son?” And in the strength of this I rode, Shattering all evil customs everywhere. And past thro’ Pagan realms, and made them mine. And clash’d with Pagan hordes, and bore them down. 26 KNIGHTHOOD. And broke thro’ all, and in the strength of this Come Victor. But my time is hard at hand. And hence I go; and one will crown me king Far in the spiritual city; and come thou, too. For thou shalt see the vision when I go.” And more than once in days Of doubt and cloud and storm, when drowning hope Sank all but out of sight, I heard his voice, ‘Be not cast down. I lead thee by the hand, Fear not.” And I shall hear his voice again— I know that he has led me all my life, I am not yet too old to work his will— His voice again. —Tennyson. DUTIES OF THE KNIGHTS. The first duty of the Knights is fidelity to God, as well as loyalty to the Church that gave them being, under whose flag they are militating. To deviate in the least from the constant practice of this duty is to be guilty of treason. It follows as a corollary that to be a good, consistent Catholic, one must also be an upright, thorough going American citizen. In matters political the Church does not concern herself, except to emphasize the fact that Catholics must live up to the standards of the great moral principles of Chris¬ tianity if they wish to do their full duty toward their country. The annals of Columbia record many ser¬ vices rendered by Catholics to the nation, but not one single act of treachery. In all our national cemeteries rest thousands of Catholic soldiers mutely attesting their loyalty to the flag, and the sacrifice of their life, joyfully made, is a continual protest against the oft- repeated slander that an obedient son of the Church cannot at the same time be a devoted citizen. THE KNIGHTHOOD. 27 IDEAL KNIGHT must not only be a Catholic, but an exemplary Catholic. The boast of the Knights of Columbus is that the cream of the Church belongs to their Order. What constitutes the cream of the Church? Not wealth, station or intellect, but true, simple piety and honesty. The Knight of old was eonstantly exercising his prowess* in tournaments, so as to keep in trim and be ready for action when duty called; the modern Knight is engaged in a continuous warfare with the enemies that surround the institu¬ tions he has promised to defend; but how can he hope to succeed and win if he lays aside the only weapons that constitute his armory; if he grows lax and re¬ ceives the Sacraments only once a year, thus neglect¬ ing to eat of the “heavenly manna” that alone can give him strength and valor. Among the Knights of King Arthur only those of stainless honor and spotless purity find the Holy Grail, which is but an emblem of the Holy Eucharist which the modern Knight ought to receive with great frequency if he wishes to preserve his Knightly attributions. “And at the sacring of the Mass—I saw The holy elements alone; but he Saw ye no more? I, Galahad, saw the Grail, The Holy Grail descend upon the Shrine— I saw the fiery face as of a child That smote itself into the bread and went.” Caution in receiving new members is of the high¬ est importance. The conferring of degrees teaches beautiful lessons, stimulates manly thoughts and feel¬ ings, but does not create manhood, which must be extant in the candidate. Both Catholics and non- Catholics, the latter especially, are watching the Knight very closely. Let his life, whether public or 28 KNIGHTHOOD. private, be above reproach; let it be a beacon-light unto others. Every dishonorable act of his is a stain upon the escutcheon of the Order. He must be magnanimous. He should never be jealous of the suc¬ cess of the other societies, nay, every noble enterprise should have his most willing co-operation, even though it may not redound to the glory of the Order. The Church societies should have him as a member, especi¬ ally the Holy Name, Temperance and St. Vincent de Paul. The pastor and clergy are entitled to his respect and obedience, even when they are indifferent or op¬ posed to the Knights of Columbus. Whatever may be the cause of their hostility, he must assume that they are sincere and the best way to render them favorable is to prove to them by his conduct that the Knights are worthy of consideration. PAROCHIAL SCHOOLS. “All the more need,” I told him, “to seek the Lord Jesus 1 b prayer; They are all his children, and I pray for them all as my own.” In its attacks the enemy always concentrates its forces upon and directs them toward the strongest, best defended part of the fortress. One of the bul¬ warks of our institutions, and therefore constantly assailed, is the Parochial School. Let the Knight be ever at his post on the battlements, ready to defend its right to existence and to extend its beneficent activi¬ ties. It is quite obvious that in order to fulfill this duty of his, and declare himself the champion of the Catholic School the true Knight must be the first one to send his children there and nowhere else. Yet Cath- KNIGHTHOOD. 29 olics are not the enemies of the public or secular schools. We believe that “character-building and spirit-nursing” must go hand in hand with “head¬ training” if we wish to do our full duty toward the children confided to our care, and for this reason we support our own schools where we teach Keligion with¬ out infringing upon the rights of fellow-citizens whose tenets are not our own. We say with Bishop Greer, of the Protestant Episcopal church: “There never was such an appetite for knowledge in the world as now. It is the altar and the shrine at which the world kneels. All this is admirable. But we are beginning to discover that intellectualization of the world has been growing in advance of its moralization. We are coming to feel that knowledge in its secular significance is not sufficient. We must have moral training, and that training must begin with the child. ‘The child is father to the man/ and the church that lives and works for the child will contribute most to the greatness of the future.” SOCIALISM. Thereafter, the dark warning of our King, That most of us would follow wandering fires, Came Ike a driving gloom across my mind. Then every evil word I had spoken once, And every evil thought I had thought of old. And every evil deed I ever did, Awoke and cried, “This Quest is not for thee.” And lifting up mine eyes, I found myself Alone, and in the land of sand and thorns. And I was thirsty even unto death; And I, too, cried, “This Quest is not for thee.” From the impracticable utopia of Communion, and the unrealizable dreams of theorists, Socialism has gradually blossomed forth into a system which, fos- 30 KNIGHTHOOD. tered by a well directed propaganda and an intelligent,, strenuous Press, is drawing to its ranks not only mal¬ contents and adventurers, but also men of serene minds, studious habits and orderly lives. It has be¬ come the great problem of the age, yet it is only a very short time since people have awakened to the realiza¬ tion of its tremendous importance. In times of peace and prosperity we become morally lax, weak and selfish; we give ourselves up to indolence and luxury; our vision becomes obscured and a false sense of utter security takes possession of us, while, at the same time, clouds are gathering on the horizon all around us, becoming gradually thicker and blacker until the storm breaks forth in all its fury. The reform of Luther, writes a contemporary whose name escapes my memory, and the thirty years war, fought in the name of Religion, leaving every home in Europe saddened and desolate, followed the splendid period of the Renaissance and the Age of Leo X—the so-called Medicean age of enlightment. After centuries of in¬ tellectual advancement and material grandeur, the patient serf of France gives his tired shoulders a dis¬ dainful shrug and the old, proud throne with all its allied institutions passes through the crucible of blood and becomes mere matter of history. The apathy of ecclesiastics made possible Luther’s triumph; the foolish motto of Autocracy “Vetat cest moi” (I am the State), the complete disregard of the people’s rights, criminal extravagance and its conse¬ quent exactions furthered the cause of “Republicanism” and a gigantic stride was made by “Liberty.” Rous¬ seau had paved the way for the Republicans just as Marx has paved the way for the Socialists. Republican institutions have degenerated; they no longer satisfy KNIGHTHOOD. 31 society and a feverish unrest is apparent everywhere. Republicanism has failed because its Spartan virtues are no longer to be found. Plutocracy has grown ram¬ pant within its bosom, has sapped its vitality, has made sycophants and grafters of its defenders. Socialism is everywhere hailed as the new Messiah and it will, must have its day. What is or will be the attitude of the children of the Church during the struggle ? The issue is going to resolve itself into a clean-cut, well-defined issue and we must be either with it or against it. The Church has already spoken and her words emanate from the Eternal Wisdom. Socialism, as it is today, is condemned, and though it will shake the world from its very foundation, it will sooner or later meet its doom in its impotent efforts to demolish the battle¬ ments that are built upon the rock of Truth. What business has the Church to meddle with the issue? Has she not always allowed the Nations to work out their destinies unhampered? Do we not find her crowning Emperors at Aquisgrane, anointing Kings at Rome and blessing the new Republics that arose out of the debris of feudalism? Yes, and a blessing she would bestow upon Socialism also if it were merely a politico-social evolution. Did not Leo XIII, with his splendidly-equipped—almost prophetic mind—foresee the needs of our present age and prepared to meet them by forming a sort of Christian-socialistic party? What a pity that its leaders went astray and the whole move¬ ment had to be condemned! The only way to solve the great problem of Socialism is to have a Socialism all our own, built upon the indestructible principles of Christianity and controlled by Christianity’s in¬ fluences. We cannot prevent Catholics from taking an active interest in social, political or civic reforms, 32 KNIGHTHOOD. nor does the Church intend to do so, but if we do not organize them so that they may work along certain lines, with definite objects in view and under the leadership of able leaders, we may expect numerous defections. Here is a splendid field of action for the Knights of Columbus and an opportunity to win im¬ perishable laurels. The Church opposes Socialism because it has become a Religion which aims to over¬ throw the most fundamental ethical principles of Christianity. Let us read the works of nearly all the exponents of Socialism and we will find that they are teeming with irreligious maxims. They "tell the un¬ wary that he may be a good Catholic and a Socialist at the same time. They speak to him of social inequal¬ ity, of the wrongs of capitalism against labor, of the tentacles of mammon reaching out in all directions, destroying competition, holding up the consumer, get¬ ting hold of public utilities for selfish aims; they sow the seed of discontent within his breast and do not throw off the mask which hides their antagonism to Religion until they have him completely in their clutches. The educated Socialist of today is a mater¬ ialist. He does not believe in a personal God, much less in Revelation. Man, according to him, has evolved from the brute. He scoffs at the idea of the soul’s immortality, hence there is no future retribution. He attributes man’s tendencies, whether good or bad, to environment, heredity and temperament, thus deny¬ ing free-will. It can be readily seen that these prin¬ ciples are destructive of all morality and show the fallacies of the system. What is the incentive to be good, to do good, to work for the betterment of the race, if there be no future life? It is not so very long ago that Victor Hugo wrote: “If you want to avoid KNIGHTHOOD. 33 the red fires of revolt which are already looming up on the horizon, throw a Bible into the plate of the poor, thus making some compensation to him for the many injustices you have heaped upon him. You deprive him of his faith in Immortality—the one thing that makes him patient and happy in spite of his ills, but what do you give him in return? Is his lot im¬ proved, the burden lifted from his shoulder ?” History has since amply justified what was then styled as “Hugo’s oppressive pessimism and vagaries. Social¬ ism is unalterably opposed to authority. According to its tenets a Catholic would have to refuse obedi¬ ence to his ecclesiastical superiors for “authority, dis¬ tinction between class and class originated in fraud and is maintained by oppression.” It aims to dis¬ integrate the very life of the Church and hates her with exceedingly great hatred because it recognizes in her an enemy worthy of its steel; because it is the very authority of the Church that frustrates its efforts, impedes its progress. It is evident, therefore, that we must impart a good, solid, Christian education to our children in order to enable them to withstand the attacks that will be made upon their faith,—as they grow up,—by insidious, cunning enemies. The Most Rev. Francis Redwood says in his pastoral letter to Australian Catholics, that Socialism antagonizes Christianity because it attacks every man’s natural right t© acquire and to hold property. Sweeping away all the old titles to ownership, it erects in their place but one, that of labor. Labor alone, it says, and not the intrinsic usefulness of a thing, determines a thing’s value as an article of exchange. Hence in its eyes, accumulated wealth of any kind, whether in land or capital, is nothing but the hoarded yield of labor, 34 KNIGHTHOOD. and is unjustly withheld from the workingman whose labor went to make it. They even go so far as to say that whatever can be used as a means of production, distribution or exchange, in short, the whole capital of a country, should be wrested from private hands and placed in those of the state, for the state to maintain all citizens alike. Now there would be no injustice done if all people agreed to such a transfer. But is it possible that all would agree? Is human nature cap¬ able of making such a sacrifice? And if it did make it, how long would perfect equality reign in the com munity? The Church has always safeguarded the rights of individuals. She enjoins upon men the com¬ mand of the Old Law: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, neither shalt thou desire his wife, nor his servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything which is his.” (Exod. XX-17) The Church is against Socialism, because it destroys the family. True, there are many Socialists who do not believe in free-love, but the underlying principles of Socialism, as well as those of Atheism and Material¬ ism, are subversive of the sanctity of the family, they offer no safeguard for the indissolubility ©f the mar¬ riage tie. Again Socialism preaches the economic independence of husband and wife, it claims that the child is born into the state and not into the family; and as the child belongs to the state, it is for the state to tend and train the child, and to determine both the character and the quality of its education. The Church, on the contrary, holds that paternal authority can neither be abolished by the state nor absorbed; for it has the same source as human life itself. The child belongs to the father and it is, as it were, a con¬ tinuance of the father’s personality. (Leo XIII, Enc. KNIGHTHOOD. 35 on Oond. of Labor). From this it follows that Catholic¬ ism and Socialism are utterly at variance and irrecon¬ cilable- I again repeat, the opportunity now offers itself to the Catholic Knights to perform knightly, illustrious deeds. They have but to pick up the gaunt¬ let and enter the field. Let them take an active part in all public affairs, especially in whatever concerns labor questions, civic and national economic questions. Above all, let them see to it that their public men are strictly honest, and invariably faithful to their trust. We have much to learn from Socialists. In less than ten years they have created an organization of over 125,000 dues-paying members. They have about 300 periodicals, and several dailies; lecture courses are given all over the country and branches have even been established in leading universities. Are we as zealous as they? Do we lack men, means, talent? No, but we lack the faith of the neophyte which they have. That in itself is a tremendous asset, as every student of the philosophy of history well knows. THE PRESS IS YOUR WEAPON, MODERN KNIGHT. Go forth, for thou shalt see what I have seen. And break thro’ all, till one will crown thee king Far in the spiritual city. Pope Pius X once took the stylograph out of the hands of a Catholic journalist kneeling at his feet and blessed it with these words: “I bless the symbol of your office. My predecessors used to consecrate warriors. I am happy to draw down the sword and armour of Christian blessings on the pen of a Chris¬ tian journalist.” Blind indeed must be those who do 80 KNIGHTHOOD. not recognize and disregard the power of the Press. Such an assumption is equivalent to an admission of impotency and consequent defeat. Listen; to what Catholic leading Prelates have to say on the sub¬ ject. Pope Pius X: “The characteristic feature of our age is, that for everything connected with manners of life and thought, the ordinary source of inspiration is the widely circulated newspaper. To remedy, there¬ fore, the evils of our day, we must make use of the means best suited to its customs. With this in view let us meet writings with writings, errors wherever propa¬ gated by the truth, the poison of evil reading by the antidote of wholesome reading; the bad newspaper, whose pernicious influence is daily producing its effect, by the good newspaper. To neglect the employment of such methods means to condemn oneself to exert no influence whatever over the people and to utterly fail to grasp the spirit of the times; while on the contrary he alone proves himself a discriminating judge of the needs of his time, who, to implant truth in souls and make it reach the greatest number of people, knows how to make skillful, zealous and unremitting use of the daily press. 'Neither the faithful nor the clergy make use of the press as they should. Sometimes peo¬ ple say that the press is an innovation and that souls used to be saved without newspapers. They do not bear in mind that in former times the poison of the bad press was not spread everywhere, and that, there¬ fore, the antidote was not necessary: “In vain will you build churches, give Missions, found schools—all your works will be destroyed, all your efforts fruitless, if you are not able to wield the defensive and offensive weapon of a loyal and sincere Catholic Press.” knighthood. 37 Cardinal Merrier, Archbishop of Malines: “Take my word for it—the necessity of consecrating all our forces to the development of the Catholic Press is a necessity of capital importance at the present moment. I, Bishop as I am, would delay the building of a church in order to help in the founding of a newspaper.” Bt. Rev. Bishop J. H. Alerding, Fort Wayne, Ind.; “The work of the Catholic press is a true Apostolate. Our Blessed Lord said to his Apostles: Ho ye unto the whole world and preach the Gospel to every creature.’ Then it was the spoken word, today it is the printed word that educates human intelligence. Prior to the invention of the printing press the work of education was a slow laborious task. What a debt of gratitude does not the world owe the much maligned monks for transcribing precious manuscripts!, popularizing art with their inimitable illuminations, and preserving literary treasures which would otherwise have been lost! If you want to ascertain the vitality of the Church in any country you have to inquire into the strength of its press. The press is a supplementary teacher in all that pertains to Holy Religion. It unites the people more closely together. Being better instructed they can make converts, for they reach people the priest cannot reach. The President of the St. Vincent de Paul Conference in France, thirty years ago, prophesied that unless the French people took greater interest in the Catholic press, some would live to see Catholic churches and establishments boldly confiscated. The prophecy has come true. Three mil¬ lion dollars’ worth of church property has been swept away by a single enactment of law. A short time ago the Cardinal Arch-bishop of France affirmed that if one-tenth of the money spent on churches and religious 38 KNIGHTHOOD. institutions had been devoted to the development and support of Catholic papers, this property would not have been confiscated.” Says Rt. Kev. JBishop Hoban, Scranton: “Com¬ pare Germany with France and what do we find ? You will find the Catholic German with four or more Catholic papers coming to his home. The German Catholic feels that it is his bounden duty to support the Catholic papers, and in no other country of the world do we find Catholics better organized than they are in Germany. There we find over one hundred of the leading Catholics occupying seats in the senate; they form a wedge. At their front in stormier days, sat the great Windthorst. He sat within twenty feet of the speaker. A few feet from him sat Bismark, the man who had crushed France. But Bismark found Windthorst worthy of his steel. Windthorst led one hundred men in the Reichstag, but back of this pha¬ lanx, behind these one hundred men were a million German Catholics educated in and kept in touch with Catholic matters by a Catholic press; and these edu¬ cated Germans, with Windthorst at their head, brought Bismark to his knees. In France what do we find? The poor Frenchman claims he cannot afford to buy a Catholic paper and the rich Frenchman does not bother his head about it. What is the result? They are at the mercy of the unscrupulous politician.” Poor France! How much has she not done in the past for the Church! Missionaries, orators, liter- ateurs all vied in their devotion to her, but now the people are being robbed of their faith, the crucifix is banished from the school, the schools themselves are closed and their noble teachers exiled. John Mitchell tells us that the executive council of the American KNIGHTHOOD. 39 Federation of Labor passed a resolution lauding Ferrer, tbe Spanish Anarchist, as a martyr to ‘Liberty’ because ‘every bit of news published in the American newspapers ’for nearly two weeks after Ferrer’s death indicated that he had been put to death unjustly, and that it was not till weeks after his death that the other side of the matter came out. Five of the eleven members of the council that passed these resolutions happened to be Catholics. If they had been readers of a Catholic paper they would have learned what kind of a man Ferrer was, that he was an out-and-out anarchist, and not an idealized martyr of liberty. It is consoling to know that France is gradually returning to the practices of the ancient Faith and that there is a revival of Catholicism throughout the land. Even the anti-Catholic and liberal press is forced to admit this. Last year (1912) at the services on Christmas day the churches were thronged with the faithful very many of whom received the Holy Sacra¬ ments. Zealous Bishops are building new churches and dividing the very large city parishes so that the people might be better attended to. May we not sup¬ pose that this renewed activity is due in great meas¬ ure to the strenuous Catholic press which, directed by that wonderful publishing institution “La Bonne Presse,” has ramifications in every town of consider¬ able size? Its founder, Father Bailly, the dean of Catholic journalists, has only lately passed to his reward. Father Casey, S. J.: “Do not talk about expense. The price of most of our Catholic papers is only five cents—the price, let me say it plainly—of one glass of common drink. Cannot a man omit one glass of drink during the week to bring home a Catholic paper 40 KNIGHTHOOD. on Saturday evening to his Catholic family? Or can he not refrain from one glass of stronger drink for which he pays ten cents; and bring home another Catholic weekly? If a man has any real desire to support the Catholic press, money will be no obstacle in his way. The poor man finds means of getting five cents to spend on the Sunday secular paper, perhaps for the sake of its colored, comic supplement- The work of the Catholic press is the work of Christ. It is a work carried on for the spread of the Gospel, and for the salvation of the souls for whom Christ died. You help the work of the missionary—the mis¬ sionary among the Indians of Alaska, the Chinese and Negroes, and the missionary here at home. But the Catholic paper is a missionary in every house which it enters. Even though you are too busy to read the paper yourself, by being a subscriber you help its cir¬ culation, you enable a copy to go into some home where it will be read and where it may spread untold bless¬ ings. A Catholic paper went into a district where no priest ever visited. And that Catholic paper won three hundred souls over to Jesus Christ. Ah! I wish I had been the person who had sent that paper. But apart from any controversial value of our Catholic papers, we should give them our support, that we may see our Religion not as it exists in the Catechism or prayer book, or around the altar or the confessional but see it also in its relations to the history of the world, to the great questions of the day and to every movement in the world’s progress. From your Catho¬ lic paper you will learn what books to read and rely on; what books to buy and recommend to others, what books to condemn as unjust to Catholics, as false to history. If you will not support the Catholic press &KIGHTHOOD. 4i for the sake of those who are sitting in darkness and waiting for light, support it at least for the sake of your children. Yon contribute generously for the sup¬ port of your schools but remember that an education is far from being complete if it does not include a taste for good reading. Such a taste can easily be fostered in them. It will save them from many a temptation, from many a sorrow. It will enable them to understand their Faith better and better as they grow up, and grow in love for it as they grow in years. Christ, our good shepherd, did not forget the children when giving his commission to the Apostle Peter. Before saying to him ‘feed My sheep,’ he said ‘feed My lambs.’ This commission given to Peter and through him to the priest, must, in a great measure, be carried out by you. Supervise, then, and direct the reading of your children. Take them away from what is dangerous and hurtful; lead them to what is safe and pure and healthful. They are the lambs of Christ. Lead them out of the quagmire and morass. Lead them up to the hills—to the pure air of Catholic truth, and the sunshine of God’s own word.” It used to be said that Catholic papers were too dear, whereas non-Catholic publications sold at such a low price as to be within reach of the poorest of the poor. Even this problem has now been solved by one of the youngest and withal ablest of Catholic journals. I speak of “Our Sunday Visitor,” edited by Father Noll, of Huntington, Ind. Early in 1912 he conceived the idea of editing a penny paper, didactic in character, and devoted to the exposition of Catholic truths and the refutation of slanders against Holy Church that appeared no longer sporadically but continuously in various periodicals started for that purpose and also 42 KNIGHTHOOD. in Protestant magazines, which had heretofore been characterized by an illuminated spirit of tolerance and fair play. It was not his intention to take away sub¬ scribes from existing Diocesan Organs, but to reach the two-thirds of Catholics who read no Catholic paper and to create and foster an appetite for Catholic lit¬ erature; he urges his readers to subscribe to as many Catholic periodicals as they can afford, the Diocesan ones especially. In response to circulars sent broad¬ cast throughout the country he received many letters of encouragement from Bishops and Priests and the “Sunday Visitor” appeared for the first time in May, 1912, with a circulation of 35,000. Its success was instantaneous and phenomenal. He offered it to the clergy for distribution on Sunday for the nominal sum of sixty-eight cents per one hundred copies when sent in one bundle, or at fifty cents a year when sent by mail to individual subscribers. Subscriptions poured in with every mail until by the end of the first year, it had a circulation of 140,000. It is still growing by leaps and bounds. Some of the Bev. Fathers who take the “Visitor” in bundles have it sold for a penny at the church by school boys to whom they give the dif¬ ference between sixty-eight cents and one dollar; others distribute it in the school, and collect a penny from the children so as to train them when still young to support Catholic literature. Those that have a book rack have it on the rack; while a few, encouraged by a spontaneous suggestion from their Bishops, distrib¬ ute it gratis and take the amount needed to pay for it from the penny collection. KNIGHTHOOD. 43 DISCIPLINE. “Nay,” said the knight; “for no such passion mine But the sweet vision of the Holy Grail . Drove me from all vainglories, rivalries And earthly heats that spring and sparkle out Among us in the jousts, while women watch Who wins, who falls; and waste the spiritual strength Within us, better offer’d up to Heaven.” In conclusion I shall state that it is the duty of every member of the Order to attend regularly the meetings of the particular Council he belongs to. In unity alone there is strength and without unity noth¬ ing can be accomplished. But unity cannot exist without discipline. Lessons in discipline are gradu¬ ally given at the meetings in the respective Council Chambers. It is there that the wishes and commands of the superior officers are made known; there it is that matters are discussed for the future framing of laws for the welfare of the Order, to be taken up at the state and national conventions; it is in the Council Chamber that the spirit of solidarity is strengthened and the “esprit de corps” fostered that makes social intercourse among the members delightful. The Order of the Knights of Columbus carries with it no menace to anybody. They are not banded against their fellow- citizens, much less against the country at large. They are prepared to take advantage of the country’s laws— and, if necessary, to agitate constitutionally for the repeal of obnoxious laws. But they do not want to shirk one single civic duty, to throw off one single social burden, or to encroach by a hair’s breadth on the liberty of a single fellow-townsman. Nay, the Order will smooth the ruggedness of controversy and diminish the jarring of strife, by forcing agitation into 44 KNIGHTHOOD. lawful channels, and by curbing the rashness and the exuberance of individual champions. May all our Catholic Societies continue to grow and flourish and may they be ever characterized by a living faith, brotherly feeling and chivalrous devotion to Holy Mother Church. “Shield to shield, helm to helm, man to man.” (Iliad, XIII, 131.) THE KNIGHT SHOULD PROTECT WOMAN’S PURITY. One of the characteristics of the old Knight was his unsullied, pure devotion to the ladies. He looked upon woman as the embodiment of chastity, modesty and sweetness. To him she was ever an inspiration and at her bidding he was willing to undertake the most hazardous enterprises. He fought most valiantly upon battlefield and in tournaments and the only re¬ compense he aspired to was a tender glance or the privilege of kneeling before her and kiss the proffered hand. The knightly troubadour would thus sing: “My golden-haired lady has deigned to smile upon me and I am happy. Her eyes have darted forth a light which has illuminated my soul. Her coral lips have opened and spoke words that awoke a thousand glad songs in my heart. In her presence I become oblivious of the world and I see no one but her. She must be the twin sister of my guardian angel for a sweet, heavenly peace pervades me and even memory banishes the phantoms of former affections. She reigns alone undisputed queen of all my faculties. When she abandons her hand in mine, I feel stronger, I ascend to higher spiritual pin¬ nacles and though frail, when I falter, her grasp is that of a giant. Though inexperienced, she seems to possess KNIGHTHOOD. 45 the intuition that sees into the most complex life. In life’s turmoil Holy Faith became dormant and I forgot how to pray. I sought surcease from sorrow in the ban¬ quet hall and amid companions that passed the flowing bowl ’round and ’round. It is no longer thus. My golden¬ haired lady has in her inimitable way, with hardly any words, taught me what I had forgotten—a child-like confidence in God. She cleansed my heart of unholy affections and brought back to my lips the prayers my poor mother tried to engrave on mind and heart when, a lisping child, I sat on her knee. To my lady fair then I offer my best lay, to her I sing the carols sweet¬ est, when the sun lingers in the West or the moon sits high in the heavens, and the air is full of the exhala¬ tions of the June blossoms and nature all around me whispers words of an exalted, beautiful, pure love.” This idealization of woman, however exaggerated it may seem to us today, exercised a tremendous in¬ fluence over the morals of the times when “Knighthood was in flower” and licentious barons and noblemen were vigorously opposed and often punished with the loss of their estate as the result of war caused by their acts of libertinism. The lack of “ideals” renders the condition of woman pitiable in the extreme. To transgress against the moral law does not mean much now-a-days and the suffrage movement, to my way of thinking, is a neces¬ sary step—a step in the right direction, for it bands women together for mutual protection; it gives them self-confidence; by asserting their God-given, inalien¬ able rights they are rendered stronger and better able to avoid the snares by which they are surrounded. We, who sit almost daily in the confessional, well know how hard fought is the battle for virtue in girls and 40 KNIGHTHOOD. women employed in homes as domestics, or in stores and factories as clerks or workers. It is the duty of the Knight of Columbus to constitute himself as pro¬ tector of the girls with whom he comes in contact and whose virtue he knows to be assailed. This is a theme of frequent conversation among the Knights, yet they sit stolidly by and allow many a pure girl to become the victim of some unscrupulous man’s lust. They have wives and sisters at home whom they love dearly. How grateful would they not be if any one would apprise them of the least danger overhanging them?. The pastor who looks after the spiritual welfare of those girls is a prudent, world-wise man. Why not inform him when any serious danger threatens them? Don’t consider this as “idle spying” on any one. It is the highest form of rescue work. SIR GALAHAD. My good blade carves the casques of men, My tough lance thrusteth sure, My strength is as the strength of ten, Because my heart is pure. The shattering trumpet shrilleth high. The hard brands shiver on the steel, The splinter’d spear-shafts crack and fly, The horse and rider reel: They reel, they roll in clanging lists, And when the tide of combat stands, Perfume and flowers fall in showers, That lightly rain from ladies’ hands. How sweet are looks that ladies bend On whom their favors fall! For them I battle till the end. To save from shame and thrall: But all my heart is drawn above, My knees are bow’d in crypt and shrine: KNIGHTHOOD. 47 I never felt the kiss of love. Nor maiden’s hand in mine. More bounteous aspects on me beam, Me mightier transports move and thrill; So keep I fair thro’ faith and prayer A virgin heart in work and will. When down the stormy crescent goes, A light before me swims. Between dark stems the forest glows, I hear a noise of hymns: Then by some secret shrine I ride; I hear a voice but none are there; The stalls are void, the doors are wide, The tapers burning fair. Fair gleams the snowy altar-cloth, The silver vessels sparkle clean, The shrill bell rings, the censer swings, And solemn chants resound between. Sometimes on lonely mountain-meres I find a magic bark; I leap on board: no helmsman steers: I float till all is dark. A gentle sound, an awful light! Three angels bear the holy Grail: With folded feet, in stoles of white, On sleeping wings they sail. Ah, blessed vision! blood of God! My spirit beats her mortal bars, As down dark tides the glory slides, And star-like mingles with the stars. When on my goodly charger borne Thro’ dreaming towns I go, The cock crows ere the Christmas morn. The streets are dumb with snow. The tempest crackles on the leads. And, ringing, springs from brand and mail; But o’er the dark a glory spreads, And gilds the driving hail. 48 KNIGHTHOOD. I leave the plain, I climb the height; No branchy thicket shelter yields; But blessed forms in whistling storms Fly o’er waste fens and windy fields. A maiden knight—to me is given Such hope, I 'know not fear; I yearn to breathe the airs of heaven That often meet me here. I muse on joy that will not cease, Pure spaces clothed in living beams. Pure lilies of eternal peace, Whose odors haunt my dreams; And, stricken by an angel’s hand, This mortal armor that I wear. This weight and size, this heart and eyes. Are touch’d, are turn’d to finest air. The clouds are broken in the sky, And thro’ the mountain-walls A rolling organ-harmony Swells up, and shakes and falls. Then move the trees, the copses nod. Wings flutter, voices hover clear: “O just and faithful knight of God! Ride on! the prize is near.” So pass I hostel, hall, and grange; By bridge and ford, by park and vale, All-arm’d I ride, whate’er betide, Until I find the holy Grail. (l^=S[£M7J —Tennyson.