V,>^.'4 V /s:^i ;;.• %.-i v.ff'.* :fK'''^ '■ »v- ■ Iff '?'>■•'* ■ State Papers of Henry VIII. vol. ii. pt. iii. p. 169 (1834), 2 Letter of John Deythyk, ibid. p. 181. » j^j^ p_ 203. 16 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTOEY regarded as the principal official dwelling of the deputies, the representatives of Henry VII. and his successor took every opportunity of residing elsewhere. The deputies of Edward VI. never lodged within its walls. Towards the close of the fifteenth century the Abbey of St. Thomas the Martyr in Thomas Court began to be used, as has been seen, for the meetings of the Viceroy and his Council. By the time of Sir Richard Edgcumbe's visit ^ it had been thus used so often that the principal room had acquired the name of the King's Chamber. The dissolution of the monasteries struck a heavy blow at the prestige of King John's Castle. The Priory of Kilmainham, becoming vested in the Crown, was at once recognised as a convenient appanage of the Sovereign, and was utilised accordingly for the principal State functions. The dissolution of the Cathedral Chapter of St. Patrick's by Edward VI. provided an opportunity, which was quickly seized, to find more desirable lodgings than either Castle or Priory appears to have afforded. The Chapter having been suppressed, it was evident that the Dean had no further need of his residence. This was accordingly assigned to the Archbishop of Dublin, who was desired to evacuate the Palace of St. Sepulchre's, which became a place of lodging for the Lord Deputy. And although in a very few years this arrangement was upset, under Queen Mary, by the restoration of the Cathedral and its dignitaries to their former status, the Deputies were slow to surrender the footing they had acquired in the archiepiscopal palace. Sussex, Sidney, and others of the deputies of both Mary and Elizabeth, were so fond of coming to St. Sepulchre's that an Archbishop of Dublin, who found their visits inconvenient, is said to have actually fired his palace ' that the Deputies should not have so good liking to his house.' ^ Whether on account of this summary process of the Archbishop, or because with the final confirmation of the Cathedral in its position by Elizabeth it became difficult ' Sir R. Edgcumbe's Voyage, loc. cit. p. 32. 2 Holinshed's Chronicles, vi. p. 28. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 17 any longer to ignore ecclesiastical rights, the accession of Elizabeth was quickly followed by the return of the Vice- roys to the Castle, and its consequent restoration to a condition of appropriate magnificence. In 1558 Sussex received directions to take in hand the repair of the Castle. But this Viceroy had been succeeded by Sir Henry Sidney before any effective steps had been taken, and it is to the latter statesman that the honour of repairing and enlarging the Castle has been properly assigned by Ware. ' The Castle of Dublin, which before his coming was ruinous, foul, filthy, and greatly decayed, he repaired and re-edified, and made a very fair house for the lord deputy and the chief governor to reside and dwell in.' ^ Such is Stanihurst's account of a restoration of which the Deputy appears to have been not a little proud. Sidney's improvements took several years to effect, and were on a considerable scale. They were crowned in the eyes of the citizens of Dublin by the putting up of a conspicuous clock, perhaps the first public clock erected in Ireland (though others were placed almost contempo- raneously over the Ostman's gate and at St. Patrick's Cathedral) ; and in Sidney's, by a Latin inscription over the gateway, in which the restoration was suitably recorded.'^ The stone containing Sidney's verses has been long since ' Ware, following Stanihurst, says : ' Sir Henry Sidney is said to have builded the inner lodgings.' Stanihurst's words are ' ampla et praeelara aedificia in castello extructa erant.' — De Rehus in Hibernia gestis, p. 22 ; Holinshed's Chronicles, vi. p. 403. - Gesta libri referunt multorum clara virorum, Laudis et in chartis stigmata fixa manent, Verum Sidnaei laudes haec saxa loquuntur, Hie jacet in solis gloria tanta libris. Si libri pereant, homines remanere valebunt, Si pereant homines, ligna raanere queunt. Lignaque si pereant, non ergo saxo peribunt, Saxaque si pereant tempore, tempus erit. Si pereat tempus, minime consumitur aevum. Quod cum principio, sed sine fine manet. Dum libri florent, homines dum vivere possunt, Dum quoque cum lignis saxa manere valent ; Dum remanet tempus, dum denique permanet aevum, Laus tua, Sidnaeus, digna perire nequit.— Stanihurst's De Rebus in Hibernia gestis, p. 22. C 18 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY defaced and removed, though the verses themselves have been preserved for us by Stanihurst. But the letters of Strafford contain a very charming reference to them, and attest the admiration felt by the most powerful of Stuart Viceroys for the most eminent among his Tudor predecessors.' Of the actual outward appearance of the Castle in early times it is difficult to form an accurate conception. Sir John Gilbert justly observes that no precise details have been transmitted to us of its architectural design ; nor have any of the older historians or antiquaries given us, other- wise than parenthetically, any glimpse of its interior. To attempt to reconstruct the Castle from the stray references which are to be found scattered through the State Papers and other documentary sources would be an exercise of the historical imagination in which fancy must needs play a larger part than fact.^ There exists, however, one docu- ment which defines with some detail the condition of the towers of the Castle, and the accommodation provided within them, in the time of Sir John Perrot's government, or about twenty years after the extensive improvements effected by Sir Henry Sidney. From this paper, which was probably drawn up in connection with the rearrangements which Perrot designed to carry out but did not effect, a good deal may be learned as to the defences of the Castle in the reign of Elizabeth.^ ' I confess (wrote Wentworth, in 1633, to Sidney's grandson, the Earl of Leicester) I made a fault against your noble grandfather by pulling down an old gate within the Castle of Dublin, wherein was set an inscription of his in verses ; but I did so far contemplate him again in his grandchild as to give him the best reparation I could, by setting up the very same stone, carefully taken down, over the new one, which one day your lordship may chance to read, and remember both him and me by that token.' — Strafford's Letters, ii. p. 168. - So far as the writer has ascertained there are only two printed representa- tions of the external appearance of the Castle. The representation of Sir Henry Sidney setting out on a State progress, which forms Plate VI. in Derricke's Image of Ireland, shows the entrance gate of the Castle with the adjacent houses. An illustration in Brooking's map of Dublin indicates that the building still retained a castellated appearance as late as 1728. In the accompanying map the outlines of the walls and towers as they stood towards the end of the seventeenth century are correctly represented, but it is not possible to fill in the details of the picture. ^ It has been printed in full by Sir John Gilbert in his Calendar of Ancient Records of Dublin, ii. pp. 558-61. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 19 The walls, described by Ware and other authorities as standing foursquare and built very strongly, had in Perrot's time a strong tower at each corner. Besides these there was a fifth, much smaller than the rest, in the middle of the south wall. The entrance gate, which opened into Castle Street, was flanked on each side by a tower less strong than the others, but of considerable proportions. The gateway, defended by a portcullis, opened on to a drawbridge which when drawn up left this building entirely cut off from the adjacent city. A moat, or gripe, which ran by the walls completely surrounded the Castle, following perhaps on the south and west walls the course of the Poddle Eiver. Of the four principal towers, two, the north-east and south- west, seem to have contained five rooms each. The south- east and north-west towers had each three rooms, and in the middle tower on the south side there were a like number. The gate towers contained but two rooms each. The towers do not seem to have been very well lighted. There were several rooms with no windows other than the ' spicks,' or loopholes, intended for defensive purposes. The north-east tower, in which the Deputy seems to have had his private rooms, was the only room in which the windows were at all numerous. There were at least eight windows among the five rooms in this tower. But in the south-east tower there were no more than two. On the other hand * spicks ' were fairly numerous, and the total of the windows and spicks in the whole Castle was at that time above fourscore.^ But Sidney's improvements, though they were evidently considerable, and seem to have provided the actual official accommodation which sufficed for the Viceroys for above a century from his time, do not seem to have remedied the most serious inconveniences of the building. By the end of Elizabeth's reign matters were nearly as bad as they had been before his time. When Kobert Devereux, Earl of Essex, in an unhappy moment for himself, was designated Viceroy, directions were given to prepare the Castle for the ' For information as to the state of the Castle towers forty years after Perrot's time, see the Survey by Pynnar, p. 38 infra. c 2 20 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY fitting reception of one whom the Queen, at that time, still delighted to honour. But considerable difficulty was experienced in providing becoming accommodation. The truth is that the Castle at this time was utilised for several purposes of public utility little consonant with the amenities of a viceregal residence. It has been justly remarked by Walter Harris, in the ex- cellent account of the Castle with which his ' History of Dublin ' opens, that the building is to be considered in a threefold aspect : as a fortress erected for the defence of the city ; as the royal seat of Government ; and as the place where the courts of justice and High Court of Parliament were wont to be held. But this description of the triple function served by the Castle down to Tudor and even Stuart times is far from exhaustive. Within its precincts room was found in addition for the Exchequer and Treasmy of Ireland, and for the Mint of Dublin, as well as for the State records of which the Castle so long remained the principal, if not the sole, depository. And it further served the purpose, more easily associated with a feudal fortress, of a prison for offenders against the State.^ However suc- cessful Sidney may have been in providing actual house accommodation, he had been unable to make any funda- mental alterations in the structure. His work was a re- storation in the strict sense of the term. Even in the reign of James I., forty years after Sidney's improvements, the great exterior walls and towers erected by Henri de Londres still preserved their original appearance. An accurate observer in that reign noted that ' the circuit of the Castle was a huge and mighty wall, foursquare and of incredible thickness,'^ which dated from King John's time. In Sidney's day, as we learn from the grimly realistic plates in Derricke's * Image of Ireland,' the battlements were still garnished with the grinning heads of decapitated chieftains. And the gaol, known as the Grate, was thoroughly insanitary. A prisoner's recollections of his place of confinement are of ' See as to these aspects of the Castle, Appendix I., p. 27 infra. 2 See Gernon's Discourse of Ireland, Part II. infra. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 21 course apt to be coloured by ineffaceable resentment ; but there is no reason to question the substantial accuracy of the description given of the Grate by Dr. Creagh, the Eoman Catholic Primate, who was confined there in 1564. The prison, according to this authority, was ' a hole where, without candle, there is no light in the world, and with candle (when I had it) it was so filled with smoke thereof, chiefly in summer, that had there not been a little hole in the next door to draw in breath with, my mouth set upon it, I had been perhaps shortly undone.' ^ After Sidney's time Perrot was authorised, in 1583, to remove both the courts of law and the prison from the Castle, but he seems to have found it impossible to procure the necessary accommodation elsewhere.^ And the same difficulty was experienced in the time of Essex. It is not surprising there- fore to find the Castle described in 1607 as ' somewhat noisome in the summer time by reason of the prison.' ^ Constant representations were made by the Deputies as to this unpleasantness, and also as to the danger caused to the courts of law, which had been restored to the Castle under Sidney, by reason of these being situate immediately above the store of ammunition ; and a very serious explosion of gunpowder which occurred on the adjacent quay in 1596 caused great and general alarm. In 1610, as appears by the surveyor's accounts at the Irish Eecord Office, a summer house was built in the gardens and the great hall repaired against a marriage feast, held in January of that year. It was not, however, until 1611 that Sir Arthur Chichester, the vigorous Deputy of James I., procured the erection of an exterior gaol for ordinary criminals, the principal State offenders being still confined in the Castle, but separated from the Deputy's lodging. Through the instru- mentality of the same Deputy the courts were removed about the same time. But the Castle still remained the scene of the meetings of Parliament. In 1613 the Hall ' Spicilegium Ossoriense, i. p. 49. 2 Cal. S. P. (Dom.) Feb. 22, 1564. » Cal. S. P. {Ireland), 1603-6, p. 381. 22 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY was fitted up for the meeting of the two Houses.^ But although the Castle was put in order again for the benefit of Sir George Carew, who came over to report on the state of affairs in Ireland in 1611, no real improvement was effected, in spite of an expenditure of 600Z. Chichester after several vain attempts to procure an improvement in the domestic accommodation — the mending of holes in the roof in Lady Chichester's bedchamber is one of the items in an account of expenditure by Samuel Molyneux, Clerk-General of the Works in 1616 — had declined any longer to reside within the precincts, and had taken up his abode in the recently built Gary's Hospital, which later gave place to the Parliament House. The next to take in hand the work of restoration was the Deputy Falkland, father of the gallant Lucius Cary. In 1620 this Viceroy apprised the Council ' that of late part of the Castle and the roof of the Council Chamber and several lodgings over it ' ^ had fallen to the ground. Four years later, ' on May 1, in the morning, a day of great expectation of a universal massacre, one of the two greatest towers of the Castle fell down to the ground, with the ordnance mounted on it,' and shook to its foundations a great part of the wall. Falkland succeeded in getting authority to carry out repairs, and an expenditure of 1,000Z. was sanctioned to restore the tower. His reforms were considerable.^ In a letter to his successor, Strafford, he takes full credit for them, calling on Strafford for ' the performance of your promise you made me that when you found how much less a prison the Castle was through the benefit of a gallery I built, not more for the King's honour than for your ease and delight, you would acknowledge that you did owe my act commendation and due thanks for the service.' * ■ Account Roll of Samuel Molynezix, Clerk-General of the Works, 1610- 1616, Irish Record Office. ■' Cal. S. P. 1615-25, p. 294. ^ In 1624, by Falkland's directions, Captain Nicholas Pynnar— the same who undertook the well-known survey of Ulster in 1619 — made an ' exact survey ' of the Castle of Dublin and certified the cost of the necessary repairs. See p. 38 infra. ' Strafford's Letters, i. p. 102. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 23 Of this gallery a picturesque description survives in the ' Travels of Sir William Brereton,' whose diary of a visit to Dublin in 1635 supplies one of the few detailed notices of the appearance and accommodation of the Castle in early Stuart times which remain extant.^ Strafford, however, does not seem to have been so much impressed as Falkland expected. In one of his earliest letters from Dublin he described the building as in great decay, and urgently calling for repair. One of the great towers had to be taken down, lest it should fall, as another had done shortly before Strafford's arrival, while Lord Chancellor Loftus was in residence as a Lord Justice ; four or five of whose grandchildren it would have ' infallibly killed,' had it fallen either an hour sooner or an hour later. In a vigorous representation to the English Council of the pressing need for repair and improvement Strafford draws for us the most detailed picture we possess of the interior of the Castle precincts at this time : — ' I have bought as much more ground about the Castle as costs one hundred and fifty pounds, out of which I will provide the House of a Garden and out Courts, for fuel and such other necessaries belonging to a family, whereof I am altogether unprovided, the bake house at present being just under the room where I now write, and the wood rack put full before the gallery windows ; which I take not to be so courtly nor to suit so well with the dignity of a King's deputy ; and thus I trust to make this habitation easeful and pleasant as the place will afford. Whereas now by my faith it is little better than a very prison.' ^ Of the alterations made by Strafford no record is known to remain, and for nearly half a century little information is available from English sources. For though Arthur Capel, Earl of Essex, who was Viceroy for several years, seems to have made important alterations, nothing is known of their extent. It is curious that for such contemporary notices as are extant of the appearance of the Castle from ' See Part II. infra, p. 381. 2 Strafford's Letters, i. p. 131. 24 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY the Rebellion of 1641 to the Revolution of 1688 we are in- debted mainly to foreign observers. From these, however, it would seem that at least an outward show of splendour was maintained, and that in appearance and equipment the Castle was not unworthy. Boullaye le Gouz, who was received at the Castle in 1644 during the first Viceroyalty of the great Duke, then Marquis, of Ormond, describes the Castle as ' in- differently strong, without any outworks, and pretty well furnished with guns of cast metal ; ' ^ and though he does not describe the interior, it may be inferred from the magnificence of the ceremonial displayed by the Viceroy in going to St. Patrick's on a Sunday, that the decorations were sufficiently sumptuous. Another Frenchman, Jorevin de Rocheford, who was a visitor at the Court of the same Viceroy a few years after the Restoration, gives more positive evidence to the like effect : — * The Castle,' he wrote, ' is strong, enclosed by thick walls, and by many round towers that command the whole town ; on them are mounted a good number of cannon. The court is small, but the lodgings although very ancient are very handsome, and worthy of being the dwelling of a Viceroy.' ^ A few years after this judgment was passed, the interest of the Castle as a relic of the Middle Ages suffered the most serious blow that had yet befallen it. In April 1684, while Lord Arran was in residence as Deputy for his father the Duke of Ormond, an alarming fire occurred, which only the promptitude of Arran prevented from ending in the destruc- tion of the whole building. The fire broke out at two in the morning in Lord Arran's dining-room, and raged for three hours. To prevent the fire from reaching the powder magazine, Lord Arran, who acted with great personal vigour and courage, and subsequently received the thanks of the city and corporation for his exertions,^ was obliged to blow up the long gallery built by Falkland communicating with the north-east tower. The damage done on this occasion has been graphically described in a letter from Sir Patrick ' Tour of the French Traveller, M. de la Boullaye le Gouz, in Irelatid, A.D. 1644. Ed. Crofton Croker, p. 6. ^ Antiquarian Repertory, ii. p. 105. See Part II. infra. * Calendar of Dublin Becoi'ds, v. p. 311. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 25 Dun to Doctor, afterwards Archbishop, King. * The dining room,' he says, ' was burnt and blown up, the new building, built by the Earl of Essex, my lord's closet and the long gallery, and all betwixt the new building and the tower on which the clock stood,' ^ Arran, thus burnt out of the Castle, took refuge in the recently acquired ' King's House ' at Chapelizod, Possibly it was by the existence of this alterna- tive that the Treasury justified their refusal to expend money on the repair of the Castle. For there seems to have been an intention at the time to abandon the Castle as a residence, ' His Majesty has lost nothing ' (so wrote Arran to the King) ' but six barrels of powder, and the worst Castle in the worst situation in Christendom.' The Duke of Ormond, however, lost effects to the value of lO.OOOZ.^ It was proposed to build a palace elsewhere, perhaps on the site of Ormond's intended mansion where now the Royal Barracks stand, and a King's letter authorising the sale of the site and materials of the Castle was actually drafted.^ Two years after the fire little or nothing had been done to make good the damage. ' As for the Castle,' wrote Ormond's successor in 1686, ' I can only tell you that as it is the worst lodging a gentleman ever lay in, so it will cost more to keep it in repair than any other. Never comes a shower of rain but it breaks into the house, so that there is a perpetual tihng and glazing.' No gentleman in Pall Mall, added Clarendon, was worse lodged than he was.^ To continue the history of Dublin Castle beyond the date at which the building ceased to be a castle in any real sense of the term would hardly be found of much interest, Down to the Restoration the Castle had continued to be, as truly as in King John's time, the citadel of a metropolis which still presented many of the characteristics of a mediseval town. Situate at the south-eastern corner of the walls of Dublin, at ' See Belcher's Memoir of Sir Patrick Dun, p. 23. - Letter of Sir H. Verney, Hist. MSS. Cainm. 7th Rep. p. 499. ^ This is stated in The Viceregal Court Historically Vindicated, a pamphlet by J. P. Prendergast, the well-informed author of the Cromwellian Settlement, but he does not give his authority. ^ Clarendon's State Letters, ii. p. 101. 26 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY the top of the rising ground which commanded the seaward approaches to the city, it, occupied for miHtary purposes the point of vantage in any attack which could be attempted. As late as the middle of the seventeenth century the low- lying land to the east of College Green was almost entirely unbuilt on, save for so much of it as was occupied by the precincts of Trinity College, and the population resided almost exclusively either within the city walls or in the southern districts comprised within the parishes ad- jacent to St. Patrick's Cathedral. During the struggles of Ormond to maintain the royal authority in Ireland, and again during the Cromwellian occupation, the Castle still re- mained the military key of Dublin. But with the Restora- tion all this was changed. The metropolis rapidly expanded, and the Castle, no longer overlooking the sea, as it had done a generation earlier when Falkland could descry from it the appearance of two Spanish ships of war in the bay of Dublin,^ became shut in on all sides, so that its defensive value to the inhabitants against the attack of an invader became insignificant. When James II. came to Dublin the Castle was hurriedly fitted up by Tyrconnel for his recep- tion, but no care whatever was spent on the defences of the building. These had indeed been pronounced worthless very shortly before by the Master-General of the Ordnance, who, in recommending the erection of a citadel ' on the hills of St. Stephen's Green,' described the condition of the ancient fortress as being ' all in rubbish by the late fire,' ^ and incapable in any event of securing his Majesty's stores of war without danger of destruction from fire, through being ' so pestered up with houses ' that the approaches to it were entirely blocked up. Worthless as a fortress, and undesirable as a residence, the Castle, from the departure of James II., ceased to be of any service save as the seat of the principal public offices. Of the Viceroys of William III. none took the trouble to reside for any time in Ireland, and some never came over to ' Cal. S. P. 1625-32, p. 258. •- Ormonde Papers, Hist. MSS. Comm. 14th Eep. ii. p. 313. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 27 their government. The Lords Justices who governed in their behalf preferred the rustic surroundings of the King's House at Chapehzod to the dismal interior of the half-ruined edifice v^hose glories had departed. In Queen Anne's reign, under the administration of the second Duke of Ormond, some attempt v^as made to improve the approaches to the Castle. In 1711 the destruction by fire of the Council Chamber necessitated a consideration of the whole question of the adequacy of the existing accommodation for the public departments connected with the Castle. This was the beginning of radical structural alterations, which, extending through a period of above a century, only closed with the erection of the present Castle chapel in 1814 by the Duke of Richmond. In the course of these alterations the King's principal residence in Ireland was entirely transformed from a mediaeval structure into the unimposing group of modern buildings which it now presents.' APPENDIX I It seems appropriate to the plan of this attempt to recall the historical associations of the Castle of Dublin prior to its eighteenth century vicissitudes, to tell something of the story of the relations of the Castle to the numerous purposes of state, other than those of official residence and seat of government, which in early times the building was made to subserve. Note A THE CASTLE AS PARLIAMENT HOUSE Besides being the seat of government and the residence of the Deputy, the Castle was also the Parliament House. The early Parliaments of Ireland were of course, like those of England, not necessarily held in the capital. Several of the most celebrated assemblies of the Lords and Commons of Ireland were held at Kilkenny, Trim, Drogheda, and elsewhere, according to the convenience or exigency of the moment. But in general the Parliament met in Dublin. And when it met in Dublin, it met, in early times at least, in Dublin Castle, no doubt in the great Hall ' Gilbert's Viceroys, p. 116. 28 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY so often mentioned in the State Papers.^ In Tudor times, of course, the same reasons that drove the Deputies to Kilmainham and St. Sepulchre's made it impossible for the Parliament to meet in the Castle. The Abbey of St. Thomas, the Carmelite Monastery in Whitefriars Street, and the Cathedral of Christ Church thus became successively the scene of its migratory sittings.^ The first Parliament of Elizabeth in 1559 was held by Sussex in the last-named building. But after the renova- tions carried out by Sidney, the Castle again accommodated the High Court of Parliament. The Parliaments of James I. and Charles I. — probably the later Parliaments of Elizabeth also — were there held in spite of the serious explosion of gunpowder which partially ruined the hall in 1596.^ The letter of Sir Christopher Plunket, describing the celebrated Parliament called by Sir Arthur Chichester in 1613, gives a graphic picture of the scene at its opening,* on which occasion both Houses were accommodated in the great hall of the Castle which had been specially fitted up for the purpose. Strafford's Parliaments were also held within the Castle, which continued to be the seat of the Legislature until the Eebellion. A description of the appearance of the two Houses during the Parliament which sat in 1635 has been left by Sir William Brereton.'' But the Parliament of 1640 was the last to meet there. After the Restoration the Duke of Ormond changed the place of assembly to Chichester House, the predecessor of the Parliament House in College Green. And with the exception of the Parliament of James II., which was held at the King's Inns, ' Other considerations besides those of mere convenience seem to have actuated the Plantagenet Deputies in their choice of a meeting place for Parliament. It was an item of complaint against Sir William de Windsor, Edward's III.'s Lord-Lieutenant in 1371, and the husband of Alice Ferrers, the fair but frail darling of his Sovereign's dotage, that he had held a Parliament at Baldoyle. There was not in the place any building but a small chapel, wherein the Parliament was held ' with the intention that, as the Commons of Ireland could not find lodging or other necessary accommodation there during their stay, they might the more quickly grant the subsidy required for the support of the King's war.' This expedient was successful, for after two or three days the Commons, ' being worn out by the tedious stay in that inconvenient place, granted the King 2,000Z. Betham's History of the Constitution of England and Ireland, p. 308. '•^ Harris's History of Dublin, p. 43. ^ ' The places here wherein the Parliaments have been used to be kept were ruined by the blast of powder, and still remain so.'. Cal. S. P. [Ireland), 1603-6, p. 460. * Lodge's Desiderata Curiosa Hibernica, i. p. 169. ^ See Part II. infra, p. 380. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 29 formerly the Black Friars, on the site of the present Four Courts, and of those held at the King's Hospital (the Blue Coat School) in 1738-9 during the building of the Parliament House, all Parliaments were held in College Green from the Eestoration to the Union. Note B THE CASTLE AS THE SEAT OF THE LAW COUKTS The relation of the Castle to the law courts was always intimate. As the language of King John's instructions to Meiller Fitz-Henry shows, it was from the first intended that the Castle should be the chief seat of legal administration, and so it continued to be, almost without interruption, down to Stuart times. No doubt the Hall of Justice suffered with the rest of the Castle in the early years of the Tudors. It appears that a representation was made to Henry VIII. by Alan, Archbishop of Dublin and Lord Chan- cellor, that the Chancery within the Castle was ' no better than a pigsty,' and orders were given in 1631 ' for the rebuilding of the Castle Halls where the law is kept, lest the Majesty of the Law should perish, and the Judges be obliged to administer the law on the hills, as it were Brehons or Wild Irishmen.'^ In 1548 the courts were transferred for a brief period to St. Patrick's,'^ during the suppression of the cathedral chapter. But on the reconstitu- tion of the Cathedral they were restored to the Castle, where they occupied the great Hall or Parliament Chamber. This arrange- ment, however, was not found convenient, and Elizabeth ' frequently desired that the terms should be removed out of the Castle,' •' where the situation of the courts over the powder maga- zine was in her time a source of natural apprehension to the justices. Instructions to this effect were given in 1585 to Sir John Perrot, who may have desired to utilise the hall in which the courts sat for the Parliament summoned in that year. Neverthe- less, it was not until 1607 that the removal of the courts from the Castle was finally ordered. In that year James I. directed that they should be held in the deserted Monastery of the Black Friars ; ^ the site of the old King's Inns, and of the modern Four Courts. But, frightened no doubt by the estimate of the cost of equipping the old Dominican Abbey for the purpose designed, his Ministers ' State Papers of Henry VIII., Foreign and Dom. Series, v. 198 p. 458. '^ See Mason's St. Patrick's, p. 154 ; Morrin's Patent Bolls of Elizabeth, i. p. 541. ^ Cal. S. P. [Ireland), 1598-9, p. 472. < Ibid. 1605-6, p. 460. 30 ILLDSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY were unable to carry out this order. Though made use of as the King's Inns and the headquarters of the Bar, it was not until after a lapse of close on two centuries that the Black Friars site was appropriated to the full use for which King James had designed it ; and, meantime, his Majesty's Four Courts found accommo- dation in a ' sumptuous fabric ' ^ in the precincts of Christ Church,^ to which they were transferred in 1610. ISlote C THE CASTLE AS EXCHEQUEE AND MINT We have seen that the Castle was from the first intended to be the stronghold in which the King's treasure should be guarded, and that in general it was the actual seat of the Exchequer and of the Mint. The Court of Exchequer, however, and perhaps the Treasury itself, was not originally within the Castle precincts. ' Among other monuments,' says Stanihurst, ' there is a place in that lane, called now Collets Inn, which in old time was the Exaxar, or Exchequer.'^ And the chronicler goes on to tell in a familiar paragraph the story of a raid by the Irish, in the course of which ' they ransacked the prince his treasure, upon which mishap the Exchequer was from thence removed.' The separate Exchequer building can be traced back at least as far as Henry III.'s time, and the Pipe Eoll for the thirteenth year of that reign has an entry of the expenditure of ten shillings 'in glass for windows of the Exchequer.' '' It may perhaps have been during the Bruce trouble that the incident commemorated by Stanihurst occurred, for from a direction to the Treasurer in 1313 to ' reside in Dublin Castle with the treasure,' and from the fact that the Castle was in that year re- paired and strengthened, it would seem as though the Treasury had previously been situate without the precincts. Thenceforward, at any rate, the Exchequer remained within the walls, though John de Wilton is mentioned as late as 1345 as guardian of the works of Dublin Castle and of the houses of the Exchequer.'^ The Castle was also long the seat of the Eoyal Mint. From the first establishment of an Irish Mint by King John in 1210, ' Camden's Britannia, p. 1367. - The following description of the Four Courtis about the close of James's reign occurs in Gernon's Discourse of Ireland : ' The Courts of Justice are kept in a large stone building, parish of Christ Church, which is built in form of a cross. At the four ends are the Four Courts, well adorned. The middle is to walk in.' See Part II. infra. * Holinshed's Chronicles, vi. p. 27. '' dbth Report of Deputy Keeper Irish Record OJice, p. 31. » Close Boll, 17 & 18 Ed. III., Irish Eecord Oilice. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 31 when mints were founded not only in Dublin but in Waterford and Limerick, to their abolition in Elizabeth's reign, the Dublin coinage seems to have been usually struck within the Castle. Several Acts of Parliament in the reigns of Henry VI. and Edward IV. contain enactments affecting the coinage, and direct the coins to be made in the Castle of Dublin. In 1425 John Cobham was granted the office of Master of the Coinage to be made in Dublin Castle, with the provision that ' all the money to be made there should be of the same weight, alloy and assay as the silver money which is made in London.' ^ An Act of Edward IV., passed at Wexford in 1463, recites the appointment of one Germyn Lynch, of London, goldsmith, to be ' "Warden and Master of our moneys and coins within our Castle of Dublin and within our Castle of Trym,' and authorises him to make all the royal coinage. Lynch, who was no doubt a Galway man, had previously been permitted to make coins in that city as well as in Eeginald's Tower at Waterford. Drogheda and Carlingford were also the seats of Eoyal Mints at this period.^ By an Act passed in 1473 Lynch was formally appointed Master of the Mint, and it was ordered that ' the King's coin be struck for the time to come within the Castle of Dublin only and in no other place in Ireland.' A later Act, passed in 1475, while ordering that coins made in Cork, Youghal and Limerick ' be utterly damned and taken in no pay- ment,' recognised the Drogheda and Waterford Mints as still legitimate. Lynch's appointment was however revoked, and the profits of the Mint granted to Gerald, Earl of Kildare. Coins were still struck in the Castle Mint as late as Edward VI.'s time, and Elizabeth certainly intended to reopen the Dublin Mint. In 1561 directions were given to the Lords Justices for the erection of a mint in Dublin, which is perhaps the ' Irish Mint House ' ^ referred to by Fynes Moryson.'* If so, the Mint in Moryson's time still occu- pied its old quarters, the Lords Justices designating ' the Castle of Dublin, with the help of the chapel next without the gate ' (St. Andrew's) as the fittest place for the Mint. But, though the pro- spect of reviving the Dublin Mint was still entertained in Sidney's time, nothing was done to give effect to it either by Elizabeth in the remainder of her reign or by her successor. There is some evidence that Charles I. intended to restore the Mint, and Charles II., at the instance of the Duke of Ormond,^ certainly gave a patent to coin silver in Ireland. But the Irish Mint was never ' Pat. Roll, 3 Hen. VI. * Simon's Essay on Irish Coins, p. 23, and App. pp. 82 and 85. ^ Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1509-1573, p. 167. ' See Part II. infra. ^ Ormonde Papers, New Series, iii. p. 302. 32 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY re-established, and except for the familiar brass money of James II. no coins have ever issued from a royal mint in Ireland since the time of Edward VI. NoteD THE CA.STLE AS A STATE PRISON The most characteristic feature of the Castle as a mediaeval fortress was that it served as the State prison. From the days of Strongbow to those of Strafford, what is now called Cork Hill was the Tyburn of the Irish capital, and the Bermingham Tower was its Tower prison from an early date. It cannot have been from the Castle, but was perhaps from some city gate, that the body of Donnell, son of Annad, was suspended with his feet upwards, and his head placed over the door in 1172, ' as a miserable spectacle for the GaedhilL' ' But from the first building of the Castle its battle- ments were utilised to strike terror into the enemies of the State by the exhibition of the heads of traitors from above its walls. Of this barbarous practice of the Middle Ages there are plenty of examples in the history of the Castle. In 1358 one William Vale, having slain several Irish chieftains in Carlow and its neighbouring districts, ' brought their heads to the Castle of Dublin to be there put up ' ; ^ and in the picture of the Castle in the illustrations to Derricke's ' Image of Ireland ' the heads of decapitated chieftains appear suspended from the battlements of the Gate Tower. In early times the prison within the Castle was in the lower rooms of the Bermingham Tower, and so continued till the seventeenth century, when it was transferred to the Gate House. The prisons were of course in the immediate custody of the Constable, who, like the Constable of the Tower of London, had the privilege of charging for the keep of provisions and hostages at a higher rate than the Constables of other castles. The earliest mention of the Castle prison to be met with in the State Papers is in 1282, when a sum of two shillings was paid for gyves ; ^ but no doubt the Castle was from the first the State prison, and in general it seems to have also been the gaol for ordinary malefactors. The inconvenience of making the Castle the common gaol was the subject of frequent remonstrances on the part of the represen- tatives of the Crown during the sixteenth century. For notwith- standing that the new gate of the city had been equipped as a ' Annals of Lough C6, i. p. 147 (Rolls Series). - Close Roll, 32 Ed. III. No. 6. See Hardiman's ' Statute of Kilkenny,' Tracts Relating to Ireland, ii. p. 85. ' Cal. S. r. (Ireland), 1252-1284, p. 423. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 33 prison in Richard III.'s time/ the Castle seems to have remained the chief place of detention, and it was not until the reign of James I. that any steps were taken to alter this arrangement. In that year the King, ' in consideration of divers inconveniences attendant on the keeping of the common gaol within the Castle of Dublin,' ^ directed that it should be removed to some other suit- able place in the city. But it was judged desirable that the Castle should still be used for the custody of State prisoners, and accordingly, to lessen the inconvenience to the Deputies, it was ordered that a wall should be built ' separating such persons from the part reserved for the lodging of the Lord Deputy.' But the cost of making these alterations was found too heavy for the grudging treasury of James to sanction, and though the prisoners were transferred to apartments in the Gate Tower, the work was badly done, and the inconvenience was soon as great as ever. It does not indeed appear precisely at what period the Castle ceased to be regarded as a fitting ward for offenders against the State. As lately as 1715 the Gate Tower of the Castle seems still to have been used for the custody of prisoners. But no doubt, after the erection of the eighteenth century Newgate built in 1773 on the Little Green on the north side of the city, it was no longer found necessary to trespass on the scanty accommodation of the Castle for this purpose.^ Note E THE CASTLE AS RECORD OFFICE No more interesting associations are attached to the Castle than those which connect it with the guardianship of the records of the State. From very early times, and probably from its foundation, the Castle was utilised for this purpose. In 1304 the Treasury accounts record that the sum of four pence was paid for ' mending the lock and key of the great vault in the Castle of Dublin where the rolls are preserved.' '' Ten years or so later, in the height of the Bruce scare, anxiety seems to have been felt for the safety of the archives. Directions were issued to Walter de Islip, the Treasurer of Ireland, ' to observe the ordinance made by the King's Council, whilst the King's clerk John de Hotham was in Ireland, that the Treasurer should reside in Dublin Castle with the rolls and other memoranda touching his office.' ^ ' See Gilbert's History of Dublin, i. p. 257. 2 Cal. S. P. {Ireland), 1608-10, p. 175. 3 Harris's Histwy of Dublin, p. 48. ' Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1302-1307, p. 107. * Cal. of Close Rolls, 1313, p. 293. 34 ILLUSTEATIONS OP lEISH HISTOEY Of the exact date of the transference of the records from the great vault just mentioned to the Bermingham Tower there is no precise evidence ; but it is certain that they were kept in the last- named place from the middle of the sixteenth century at least. An elaborate memorandum, drawn up by John Alan, Master of the Eolls,' not long after the suppression of the rebellion of Silken Thomas, contains an important recommendation in regard to the safe-keeping of the records ; and shows that the most culpable laxity had previously prevailed with regard to them : ' And, for conclusion, because there is no place so meet to keep the King's treasure as is His Grace's Castle of Dublin in the tower called Brymmyniames Tower — and where in times past the negligent keeping of the King's records hath grown to great losses to His Highness, as well concerning his lands as his laws, for that every keeper for his time, as he favoured, so did either embezzle, or suffered to be embezzled, such muniments as should make against them or their friends, so that w^e have little to show for any of the King's lands or profits in these parts ; it is therefore necessary that from henceforth all the rolls and muniments to be had be put in good order in the aforesaid tower, and the door thereof to have two locks . . . and that no man be suffered to have loan of any of the said muniments from the said place, nor to search, view or read any of them there, but in the presence of one of the keepers aforesaid.' '^ No attention seems to have been paid to Alan's recom- mendation, for in 1551 the law courts having been removed, as already stated, to St. Patrick's, an order was made by the Privy Council for the transference ' to the late library of the late Cathedral Church of St. Patrick's ' of ' the records and muniments of his Highness's Chancery,' ^ on the ground that the tower within his Majesty's Castle of Dublin was both ruinous and too distant ' State Papers of Henry VIII. vol. ii. pt. iii. p. 486 (1834). '^ In mediaeval times there appear to have been two distinct record reposi- tories, viz. : the Chancery and the Treasury of the Exchequer. The Exchequer documents Included not only Exchequer records proper, but the rolls of all the King's Justices at Common Law, and were kept at the Castle. The Chancery records consisted of Patent and Close Rolls, Bills or Warrants of the Justiciary of Ireland, Writs of various kinds, Injunctions, &c., and were kept in St. Mary's Abbey. In 1300, however, almost the entire contents of the Chancery were destroyed in the fire which burnt the Abbey in that year, and thereafter the Chancery documents seem to have been kept for a considerable period in the Treasury of Trim Castle, and later, as Alan's memorandum suggests, in the private houses of the successive Masters of the Eolls. ^ Smyth's Laio Officers of Ireland, p. 55. Mason's Histoi-y of St. Patrick's Cathedral, p. 155. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 35 from the courts. What effect was given to this order we have no means of knowing. But from the brief stay of the courts in St. Patrick's it is unUkely that it was acted on. And it would seem from the terms of the order that in any case only legal records were intended to follow the courts. At any rate the Order in Council specifically directed that the tower should remain the general State Paper repository. No adequate arrangements were made under Edward VI. or Queen Mary for the protection of the documents in the tower ; and the only effect of the order just referred to seems to have been that the records were disturbed and disordered, and their safety imperilled. When Sir Henry Sidney entered on his government he found them, according to Collins, ' in an open place, subject to wind, rain, and all weather, and so neglected that they were taken for common uses.' ^ It is to Sidney's admirably efficient administration that we are principally indebted for the preservation of a great portion of the State Papers, and we un- questionably owe to him the establishment of the earliest Irish Eecord Office. In 1566 he directed Henry Draycott, then Master of the Rolls and Chancellor of the Exchequer, to undertake the ' perusing, sorting and calendaring ' of her Majesty's records, which he had previously ' well laid up in a strong chamber of one of the towers of Dublin Castle.' ^ He also appointed, as Stanihurst remarks, ' a special officer with a yearly fee for the keeping of them.' Thomas Cotton, the Deputy Auditor-General, was the first to hold this office.^ The salary of this earliest Deputy Keeper of the Records was fixed at 101. per annum. At this modest figure it remained down to the year 1715, when it was enlarged to the move substantial figure of 500Z. a year for the benefit of no less distinguished a personage than Joseph Addison, then Chief Secretary to the Lord-Lieutenant, and it so continued down to the constitution of a Public Record Office by Statute in 1817.'' In 1635 Strafford drew attention to ' the want of Treasuries for His Majesty's Records of his Four Courts,' and his recommen- dation that a proper office should be built resulted in the provision of a Rolls Office.'' In a vigorous minute Strafford pointed out that the legal records having been latterly kept for want of proper custody in the house of the Master of the Rolls, many records had been lost, and more recently burned in a fire which had consumed ' Collins's Sydney State Papers, Memoir, i. p. 90. 2 Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1509-73, p. 295. 3 Fiants, Eliz. Nos. 3320 and 3614, Irish Kecord Office. * Liber Mtmerum Hibcrnitc, II. vi. 205. -' Strafford's Letters, i. p. 527. d2 36 ILLUSTKATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY that official's residence. From this time probably dates the definite separation of the legal records of the country from the State Papers properly so called.^ Note F THE OFFICE OF CONSTABLE OF DUBLIN CASTLE From the very earliest times until late in the eighteenth century the Castle was governed by a Constable, an officer of considerable dignity, who was responsible for the security of its defences, and for the safe custody of the prisoners committed to the Grate. The office appears to have been at all times one of high consideration. Like the Constable of the Tower of London, its holder was entitled, as already noted, to demand higher fees for the maintenance of prisoners and hostages than were chargeable in other castles in the kingdom. The earliest express mention of a Constable by name is that of Simon Muredoc,^ who in 1245 was directed to give formal possession of the Castle to Henry III.'s newly appointed Justiciary, John Fitz-Geoffrey. But it would appear that, in 1226, Theobald Walter,^ the ancestor of the Ormond family, had the custody of the Castle, and may have been its first Constable. One Hugo de Lega was Keeper of the Castle in 1235, but the office of Keeper was then, as well as in later times, distinct from that of Constable. The salary of the Constable, exclusive of fees, was twenty pounds Irish, and it seems to have remained at this modest figure as late as the Eestoration, when an allowance of ten shillings a day was added.^ At the accession of George II. it was again raised, the ' ancient fee of twenty pounds ' being augmented by an addition of 345 Z., thus bringing up the full emoluments to a pound a day. But the perquisites must at all times have been valuable. The privilege of residence within the Castle seems to have been highly valued, if we may judge from the petition of Jaques Wingfield, who, about 1560, 'bilded an handsome lodging for himself at his own proper charge.' ^ And the Ormonde Papers contain an agreement for the sale of beer h" For information on the state of the Irish records generally prior to the nineteenth century see the prefaces to the three volumes of Morrin's Calendar of the Patent and Close Rolls of Chancery in Ireland. 2 Cal. S. P. {Ireland), 1172-1251, p. 417. ^ Ibid. p. 217. * Ormonde Papers, New Series, vol. iii. * State Papers (Ireland), Eecord Office, vol. xvi. p. 25. Wingfield was ordered by the Deputy, Fitzwilliams, to quit his lodging. In a petition to Cecil, Wing- field describes the residence as ' my cottage in the Castle that standeth on the North Wall of the Castle joined to the Constable's prison.' The Constable' lodgings had previously been on the opposite side, but were moved when Sidney built the Viceregal lodgings on the south side. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 37 within the Castle on terms which must have been very profitable to the Constable.^ The defensive establishment of the Castle seems to have varied from time to time, but four gunners and fourteen warders seem to have been the normal complement. The city in early times seems to have been called on to contribute to the cost of defending the Castle, as appears from a fine inflicted in 1312 on John le Usher, then Constable, who, having been allowed the cost of maintaining twelve extra men, over and above the ordinary garrison, who were to receive their pay out of the city dues, neglected, ' con- trary to his oath and in deceit of the King and Court,' to maintain the additional men. The city was likewise called upon about this time to supply the Constable of Dublin Castle with ' twelve good arbalists, with fitting gear and ten thousand bolts ' ; and in 1315 the Mayor and Sheriff's provided a quantity of munition for defence of the Castle.^ In 1537, Alan, the Master of the Eolls, in calling attention to the necessity for the repair of the Castle, re- commended that ' for the custody thereof, and many other dangers, the Constable of the same be an Englishman of England born, whose dwelling shall be continually within the said Castle with- out appointing of a deputy, and he to be associated with four gunners, of the which number two shall always be present.' ^ A LIST OF THE CONSTABLES OF DUBLIN CASTLE (Compiled from the Liber Munerum Hihernice, the State Paper Calendars, and other sources.) 1226. Theobald Walter. 1377. John Davenport and 1245. Simon Muredoc. 1276. Henry de Ponte. 1278. Peter de Condon. 1280. William Burnel. 1285. Philip Keling, Junior. 1293. John Wodelok. 1296. Henry le Waleys. 1302. Simon de Ludgate. 1302. John le Usher. 1325. Henry de Badowe. 1352. James, Earl of Ormond. 1371. Eoger Ocley. Eichard Ocley. 1381. Eoger de Levenes. 1383. John Barnolby. 1399. William le Scrope. 1399. William Eye. 1401. Jenico Dartas. 1427. Christopher Plunkett. 1450. Giles Thorndon. 1453. Sir Henry Bruen. 1454. John Bennet. 1467. Thomas Alfray. 1474. Gerald Fitzgerrot. 1486. Eichard Archbold. ' Agreement of Dudley Mainwaring with Nicholas Buck, Ormonde Papers, N.S. iii. '^ Historic and Municipal Docuvients, pp. 302, 327 ^ State Papers of Henry VIII. vol. ii. pt. iii. p. 486 (1834). 38 ILLUSTKATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY 1533. Sir John White. 1628. Roger Davys and 1543. John Parker. Samuel Dargas. 1561. Robert Tucker. 1635. Mathew Mainwaring. 1566. John Bettes. 1644. Mathev^r and Dudley 1566. WilHam Denham. Mainwaring. 1566. Jaques Wingfield. 1660. Sir John Stephens. 1575. Silvester Cooley. 1673. Col. John Jeffreys. 1587. Stephen Segur or 1680. Arthur Turner. Segrave. 1681. James Clarke. 1588. John Maplesden. 1684. James and William 1591. Michael Kettlewell. Clarke. 1600. Tristram Eccleston. 1708. John and William 1607. Henry Piers or Persse. Pratt. 1611. Roger Davys. 1727. Thomas Hatton. 1617. Roger Davys and 1767. Henry Seymour Robert Branthwaite. Conway.' APPEN DIX II A SURVEY OF DUBLIN CASTLE IN 1624.- May it please yo*" Most Hono'"'''*' LLps, — I longe since repre- sented unto yo"" Up^ the pticuler surveyes of the severall forts of most importance in this kingdom, taken by S'" Thomas Rotherham and Capten Pinner, togeather w"^ an Estimat of the chardge w'^'^ the repayre of them would amount unto ; And lately by my Ires of the ix*'^ of the last Monneth, I was bould to offer the consideracon thereof againe unto your lip* : Since that tyme having^ heard somthing*^ of the proceedinges in Parliament, & not knowing^ what alteracons the constitutions of these tymes may produce, I have caused Capten Pinner to take an exact survey of this Castle of Dublin, and to certefy the ruins of it, togeather w*'^ the chardge that the repayre of it, shall com to, w*^^ I heere inclosed present unto your lip®, and doe humbly desyre, that as it is my duty to acquaint your lip® w* these pticulers, soe yow wilbee pleased to dirrect mee in due tyme what course to houlde in them, that I may resolve accordingly. Yo>' most Hono'*^''^ LLp® Most humbly at Commaund, Falkland. Addressed : To the Right Hono'''''' my very good Lordes the Lordes of his Ma" Most Honorable Privy Councell. Endorsed : xi° Aprilis 1624, from y'^ Lo : Deputie of Irelande, concerning a survey of y'' Castle of Dublin. ' Conway was the last Constable. The office was abolished by the Statute 57 George III. cap. 62. « S. P. (Ireland), vol. ccxxxviii. pt. i. No. 37, I. HIS MAJESTY'S CASTLE OF DUBLIN 39 Dublin Castle : An Estimacon made the 5^^ of Aprill 1624 by Thomas Pynnock and Thomas Gray Masons, for the Pulling downe of the greate Towar standing West North West being 63 foote high w^*^ maketh 3 perches at 21"*^ foote the perche, and the Compasse ther of being taken in the myddell of the walle is 124 foote making 6 perches for the Circumference. And the thicknes of the walle is Tenn foote. u For the Pulling downe of the Tower and lainge the Stones in place may cost by Estimacon . . 080 00 00 The Tower will conteine 1600 perches, w* for the Workmanship only at 2s. 6d. the pche will cost . 200 00 00 Every perch of work will require 2 barrells of roache lyme, w'^'' at 9d. the barrell being 3200 barrells will cost 120 00 00 Every Barrell of lyme will require 2 barrells of sand w°^ at 3d. the barrell to be layd in the place to be wrought, being 6400 barrells will cost . 080 00 00 For Diging of stone sufficient for this worke may cost by Estimacon ...... For the Stone it self and bringing it home may cost For Scaffoling For Ankers, Dogges and Spikes may cost For 100 stone stayres ruff hewed at 3s. 4d, the pece 016 For Tymber and planks for one platforme and fyve floores may cost by Estimacon .... 100 00 00 For taking up of the lead, W^'* must be all newe cast and wrought, may cost by Estimacon . . . 050 00 00 For Clensing the Moate from all Eubbish and the Mudd w*^'^ in greate aboundance, may cost . . 060 00 00 Suma .891 00 00 Nicfeo Pynnar T. P. Thomas Graye . Masons. li Ther is also in diuers of the Towers (w*='^ because the names of them are not knowne, we doe sett downe in generall their defects) a greate deale of walle, and parapet that is fallen downe, and som so ryven that it must be taken downe, w*^^ wilbe in all 213 perches and for the Workmanship of all this w*^^ stone, lyme, and sand will cost 8s. each perche as is here under specified, and this will amount unto by estimacon . . . . 85 8 045 00 00 090 00 00 025 00 00 025 00 00 016 00 00 40 ILLUSTEATIONS OP lEISH HISTOEY li There is a greate deale of stone work must be pulled downe, and the stones to be saued and layd in place may cost by Estimacon . . . .500 The Tower called Bremagems Tower wanteth no stonework but it hath no platforme, W^*^ is a place fitt for a peece of Artillery, this is 41 foots long and 24 foote wide, and this may cost by Estimacon 24 The leade of this Tower must be taken up and new wrought w'^'^ may cost by Estimacon . . . 30 00 Ther is a litle Tower standing South w'=^^ also hath no platforme and is very needefull to have a peece of Artillery and this may cost by Estimacon 14 00 The lead also of this must be taken up and newe wrought, w*^'^ may cost by estimacon . . . 25 00 00 For Ankers, Dogg^* and Spikes to fasten in the walles, w* for want of theise formerly hath bene the cause of the Euin of theise walles, and this may Cost by estimacon . . . . . 25 00 00 All the out side of the Castle walle towards the South and the west is weather beaten, and in the West end ther is a crack from one tower to the other and must be pynned, both in that place and som others, and this may cost by estimacon 250 00 00 Suma . 458 8 00 Ther must be for every pch of work 2 Cart load of stone w'=^ doth cost 3s. For 2 barrells of Eoach lyme ..... 18d. For 4 barrells of Sand 12d. For workmanship each perche at ... . 2s. 6^. Suma . 8s. Nicho Pynnar T. P. Thomas Graye . Masons. Endorsed : A Survey of the Castle of Dublin, April 5, 1624. II THE PHCENIX PARK The Phcenix Park is the greatest and most abiding monu- ment of that extraordinary revival and extension of the Irish capital which followed the Kestoration, and which in the space of a few years transformed Dublin from a mediaeval city into a modern metropolis, Down to the era of the Com- monwealth Dublin had remained a walled town, within the ambit of whose fortifications little or no change affecting its general appearance had taken place for a couple of centuries. From the days of the later Plantagenets to those of the later Stuarts, it may almost be said, no scenic transformation on a large scale was effected in the aspect of the capital, save what was involved in the suppression of the monasteries and the conversion of the Abbey of St. Mary's and the Priory of All Hallows from religious to civil uses. The disturbed condition of Ireland throughout the whole Tudor period sufficiently engaged the attention of successive Deputies from Poynings to Essex ; and when the compara- tive calm that followed the Plantation of Ulster left leisure to such liberal-minded rulers as Chichester, St. John, and Falkland to contemplate the improvement of the capital, even the expenditure which was found to be indispensable to make Dublin Castle habitable was with difficulty sanc- tioned by the parsimony of James I.' Such extensions of the city as took place in the early years of the seventeenth century lay in a south-easterly direction, some part of the empty space between Dublin Castle and Trinity College being appropriated to Chichester House. But no attempt was made to enlarge the bounds of the metropolis to the ' See pp. 21-22, supra. 42 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY west, where on the north the meadows and green of Oxman- town lost themselves in the vague hinterland of Grangegor- man, and on the south fresh meadows running down to the banks of the Liffey extended from James's Street to the old priory of Kilmainham.^ The all-pervading energy of Strafford would probably have undertaken the adornment of the capital had time and fate permitted. His letters are not without evidence that the subject was in his thoughts. But the dread Viceroy passed to his doom on Tower Hill, leaving no visible memorial nearer Dublin of his long tenure of uncontrolled authority than the crumbling walls of his unfinished edifice near the Naas road. After Strafford's departure ensued the terrible epoch that followed the Kebellion of 1641. Fire and sword, ' Red ruin and the breaking up of laws, laid hold of Ireland for a full decade. And the war and waste which devastated the whole country nowhere left ruder traces than in the streets and fortifications of Dublin and in the fortunes of its hapless citizens. It is difficult to picture a scene of greater desolation, indigence, and even famine than is painted in the letters of the Irish Lords Justices in the years immediately following the Rebellion and in those of the Viceroy, afterwards the first Duke of Ormond,^' in the disastrous years that preceded his abandonment of Ireland to the Eoundheads. The decade 1651 to 1660 was one of less disturbance. But a military government seldom en- courages municipal prosperity, and the general sense of the insecurity of the Cromwellian regime was unfavourable to private enterprise. Thus it was not until the Restoration that any effort was made to rescue the city from the decay into which it had fallen. Then, indeed, was witnessed a marvellous change. ' As late as the end of the seventeenth century Spenser's line still remained photographically descriptive of the flow of the Liffey right up to the city : — ' There was the Liffy rolling downe the lea.' Faery Quee^w, Book IV. canto xi. * Letters of the Irish Lords Justices, 1641-44. Ormmide Pap&rs, New Series, vol. ii. THE PHCENIX PAEK 43 In the year 1661 the Duke of Ormond, sharing the happier fortunes of the cause to which he had clung in adversity, and returning from exile with his master, was appointed Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, or, to use the pictur- esque phrase of the time, ' came to the sword.' A great nobleman, possessed of a stake in the country greater than that of any other subject of the Crown, Ormond was in the fullest sense a resident Viceroy. Having held the sword in the evil days of rebellion and civil war, he knew, as no one else could, all that the country and the capital had suffered, and he returned to Ireland animated with a desire to do all that in him lay to give back prosperity to both. How far he succeeded in the political sphere in fulfilling expecta- tions of which, as he remarked, it would have required another and a larger Ireland to satisfy them all, need not be discussed here. But of the efficacy of his plan for the reno- vation of Dublin there can be no sort of question. If the exile of the Koyalists to Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, and wherever else the scattered followers of Charles II. found a refuge in Continental centres, did nothing else for them, adversity was not without its uses in enlarging their experience of men and cities. Ormond and his adherents returned with new and liberal ideas of what a capital ought to be, and to these they speedily gave effect. Houses every- where sprang up without the walls of Dublin. The space from Cork Hill to College Green previously but sparsely occupied was quickly filled up. Oxmantown Green became so built upon that, in less than eight years, Ormond was obliged to requisition St. Stephen's Green, then lately walled in, as an exercise ground for his garrison, and the northern quays began to be formed as we now know them.' So rapid was the extension that the citizens, mindful of their past troubles, called the attention of the Viceroy to the difficulties likely to be occasioned in time of war by reason of the large number of dwellings which now lay without the fortifications ; and ' See the Description of England and Ireland by Mens. Jorevin de Kocheford, Paris, 1672, Part II. infra. 44 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Arthur Capel, Earl of Essex,' one of Ormond's successors in the Viceroyalty, writing in 1673, observes that ' the city of Dublin is now very near, if not altogether, twice as big as it was at his Majesty's restoration, and did, till the Dutch war began, every day increase in building.' But of all the adorn- ments and additions then planned and accomphshed, by far the greatest was the formation and enclosure of * his Majesty's Park of the Phoenix.' Although the Phoenix Park, as it now is, and as it has been known to the citizens of Dublin for above two centuries, has for its southern boundary the road running by the north bank of the Liffey from Dublin to Chapelizod, it originally embraced both sides of the river, and included the land on which the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham, now stands. Here it was that the Duke of Ormond found the nucleus of the Park. At the time of his return from exile the lands of Kilmainham had been for exactly a century in the undis- turbed possession of the Crown. Originally granted by Strongbow to the Knights Hospitallers in 1174, they had remained until the Reformation the appanage of what Ware calls 'the most noble Priory of St. John's of Jerusalem in Ireland.' ^ But they had been surrendered to Henry VIII. in the thirty-third year of that monarch's reign by the then prior. Sir John Rawson.^ The Hospital and its lands remained in the possession of the Crown from 1542 onwards, during the reigns of Edward VI. and Queen Mary, and the priory appears even thus early to have been utilised as a Viceregal residence. In Ware's ' Annals ' ^ the Lord Deputy, ' Essex Papers, Camden Soc, New Series, vol. xlvii. - Ware's Amials, p. 259. On the suppression of the Knights Templars by Edward II. in 1313, their lands in Ireland were given to the Knights of St. John. Hence the mistake of Archdall, who, in his Mcynasficoii, erroneously states that the lands of Kilmainham were granted by Strongbow to the Knights Templars. ArchdaU's Monasticon Hibernicum, edition of 1876, ii. p. 02. ^ 1542. A Statute (34 Henry VIII.) passed in this year at Dublin enacted ' that the King our Sovereign Lord shall have, hold, possess, and enjoy to him, his heirs and successors for ever, the said late dissolved Hospital of St. John's of Jerusalem in this realm, and all and singular its possessions, lands, appurte- nances,' &c. * Ware's Annals, p. 142. THE PHGENIX PAEK 45 Thomas Eadcliffe, Viscount Fitzwalter, is described as marching in 1557 with his forces ' from the Hall of Kilmain- ham, being the Lord-Lieutenant's place of retire.' But at the close of the same year the priory was restored by Queen Mary, at the instance of Cardinal Pole, to the Knights of St, John, one Oswald Massingberd being installed as prior. Massingberd's tenure was necessarily brief. On the accession of Elizabeth in the year following he fled overseas, and Fitzwalter, returning to the Viceroyalty as Earl of Sussex, resumed possession of the priory. Thereupon it was found expedient to settle the title of the Crown on a clear basis ; and, accordingly, by * An Act for the restitution of the late priory or hospital of St. John's of Jerusalem,' the house and lands were declared to be ' annexed to the Imperial Crown of this realm in the Queen's most royal person ' in as full a manner as before the patent to Sir Oswald Massingberd.^ The priory, or as it now began to be called, the Castle of Kilmainham, having considerably decayed since the original suppression of the Knights of St. John by Henry VIII. ,^ Elizabeth, deeming it a fit place for the residence of the Chief Governors of Ireland, gave order for its repair. For the next thirty years it was so used by successive deputies from Sir Henry Sidney ^ to Sir William Fitzwilliam, though the former, on his first arrival, finding the repairs inadequate, was obliged to take refuge in the archiepiscopal palace of St. Sepulchre's.^ But after Fitzwilliam's departure in 1588, the hall or principal building was suffered to fall into woeful dilapidation, whilst its appurtenant premises had already degenerated into hopeless ruin. A memorandum drawn up ' statute 2 Elizabeth, cap. vii. - MS. Annals of Dudley Loftus in Archbishop Marsh's Library, Dublin. ' ' In the Christmas holidays, 1566, 1 visited him [O'Neill] in the heart of his country . . . and when word was brought him that I was so near him — " That is not possible," quoth he, " for the day before yesterday I know he dined and sate under his cloth of estate in his hall of Kilmainham." ' Sir H. Sidney's Journeys, Ulster Joiirnal of Archceology, iii. p. 42. Sidney during his residence caused Island Bridge to be built on the site of a structure built of stone in the middle of the fifteenth century, but swept away by a flood in 1545. The bridge was long known as Kilmainham Bridge. * Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1509-1573. And see p. 16, su]p7-a. 46 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY in 1572 of ' the decays of the Manor place of Kilmainham,' and of the mills and weirs there,' shows the extent to which decay had even then spread ; St. John's Church being roofless, St. Mary's chapel being utilised as a stable and its steeple broken down, and the fort by which the whole was defended presenting a complete wreck. The mills and weirs of Kilmainham had also fallen into ruin, 'the pound by which the waters of a swift-running river named the Liffey ' had course to the former having two great breaches or gaps in it, and the weirs 'for the taking of samon ' urgently needing repair. But sorry as was the spectacle thus presented by her Majesty's House of Kil- mainham, no attention whatever was paid by Elizabeth to the frequent remonstrances of her representatives in Ireland at the neglect of the place. After Fitzwilliam's departure the ancient priory was degraded to a granary, though manj^ years were still to elapse ere it ceased to be officially regarded as a possible Viceregal habitation. In 1599, when the favourite Essex was about to come over on the luckless mission which was to lead him to the scaffold, orders were given for the putting in readiness of her Majesty's House of Kilmainham for the Lord Lieutenant's reception ; but a sum of 153i!., expended by the Lords Justices in repairs pursuant to this order, incurred the disapproval of the Treasury, who endorsed the item in the accounts ' a house of pleasure without Dublin, and therefore a superfluous charge.' ^ The later Elizabethan Viceroys, exercising their office for the most part through Lords Justices, were little incon- venienced by the loss of their only official residence outside Dublin Castle. But early in the reign of James I. that vigorous administrator Sir Arthur Chichester, who was Lord Deputy for twelve years, of which eight were spent in Ireland, did his best to get the place put into order. In 1605, he applied for ' 1,000^. harpe, making 750?. sterling for the repair of the house at Kilmainham, as a residence for the Lord ' ' Decays of the Manor Place of Kilmainham,' Irish State Papers, Ehz. vol. xiv. p. 57, ii., Record Office. 2 Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1599-1600, p. 240. THE PHCENIX PAEK 47 Deputy in the summer months, when the castle is somewhat noisome by reason of the prison.' ' Four years later he was obliged to name 3,000Z. as the sum necessary, describing the place as ' a goodly vast building, but like to be utterly ruined and blown down the next winter.' Chichester plaintively added that he made this representation only in discharge of his duty, ' Kilmainham being his Majesty's only house in this kingdom meet for the deputy to reside in,' but not expect- ing that any attention would be paid to his remonstrance. It being plain that King James and his Ministers cared nothing for the place, and were only desirous of getting rid of the cost of keeping it from further dilapidation, divers of his officers in Ireland began to set covetous eyes on Kilmainham. Memorials were addressed to the King pointing out its ruinous condition and the valuelessness of the lands attached to it, and expressing a loyal readiness to relieve the Crown of the whole. In 1609, Sir Kichard Sutton,^ his Majesty's Auditor of Imprests, proposed to take a grant of all the lands on the north side of the Liffey in fee-farm for ever, with the reservation of only 201. a year to the Crown, in consideration of his surrender of certain lands in Cornwall. A King's letter directing a patent to issue was accordingly sent over to Chichester, from whom it drew a vigorous protest. The Lord Deputy sus- pended the grant till his objections could be considered by the Privy Council, pointing out the desirability of restoring the house as a Viceregal residence, and observing that if the lands were alienated the deputies would be ' without any place either of pleasure or help towards housekeeping.' He con- cluded by expressing his opinion that if the grant should be made the Crown would ere long be coerced either to largely increase the Viceregal allowances or to buy back Kilmainham. Chichester's protest, however, fell on deaf ears. In the following year the patent issued to Sutton, and the Deputy, despairing of procuring its revocation, proposed to build an official country seat at Drogheda, where the Irish Primates, ' Cal. S. p. {Ireland), 1603-6, p. 381. 2 Ibid. 1608-10, p. 332. 48 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IKISH HISTOEY who were frequently made responsible for the government of the country in the absence of the Deputy from Ireland, had their principal residence. The priory of Kilmainham was left derelict. No attempt was ever thereafter made to restore the building, of which half a century later little or nothing remained.^ In the Down Survey, the remnants are described as the ruins of a large castle ; and when in 1680 directions were given to clear the site for the erection of the Koyal Hospital, there only remained part of the walls of the chapel, the stones of which were carefully taken down and used in building the chapel of the Hospital. But the disappointed Deputy had not to wait long for the fulfilment of his prophecy. Sir Eichard Sutton never took possession of the lands of Kilmainham, but assigned his grant in 1611 to Sir Edward Fisher,^ to whom, in the same year, a fresh grant was issued confirming his title to all the lands on the north side of the Liffey and Kilmainham Bridge, extending from Oxmantown Green to Chapelizod and to the river Liffey, and including 330 acres, part of the demesne of the late Hospital of Kilmainham, and 60 acres known as Kil- mainham Wood. On the property thus granted, Fisher, who acquired at the same time the sole right of fishing in the Liffey, erected a country house. But in 1618 he surrendered his patent to the King ^ for a sum of 2,500^., whereupon the ' See also Carew Cal. (1603-24), p. 80. ' I have caused an exact view to be taken of the house at Killmainham, and appraise most of the materials to be made by skilful men, which amounteth not to 300Z., leaving the stable, a garden, and the walls of a garden standing.' Answer, • Lord Carew is directed to view the place, and on conference with you to direct what is necessary to be done.' 2 The grant to Sir E. Fisher included : ' All the lands lying on the northern side of the Liffey and Kilmainham Bridge, 330 acres ; being part of the demesne of the late Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem ; a parcel of underwood called Kilmainham Wood, 60 acres ; all bounding and extending to the high-road leading from Oxmantown Green near Dublin, to Chapel Izod, and to the river Litfey, South ; to the lands of Newtowne, East ; to the hedge and lands of Newtown, Ashtown, and Mainham's Bush, North ; to the plowlands in or near Chapel Izod in the tenor of Sir Henry Power, West ; a parcel of meadow 10 acres extending to Kilmainham Bridge, East ; to the road, North ; to the lands of Chapel Izod, West ; and to the Liffey, South, parcel of the estate of the said Hospital.' Total rent lOZ. EngUsh. To hold for ever as of the Castle of Dublin in common socage. Patent Roll of James I. 1611, * Ibid. pt. ii. THE PHCENIX PARK 49 lands with the house thereon were, by special direction of the King, converted to the use of the Chief Governor of Ireland for the time being. This repurchase of the lands of Kilmainham was effected by Sir Oliver St. John, afterwards Lord Grandison, who in 1616 had succeeded Chichester as Deputy, and who, almost immediately after Fisher's surrender, took up his abode at ' his Majesty's House at Kilmainham called the Phenix.' ^ The house is first described by that name in an order for payment of moneys disbursed in repairs in February 1619, and thenceforward it is constantly used. With respect to the origin and derivation of this name, I ^ cannot presume to meddle in Gaelic etymology. The explanation offered by most local historians, and expanded by Dr. Joyce, refers the name to a corruption of the word Fionn (or Phion) uisg\ signifying clear, or limpid, water. According to this sugges- tion the name denotes a spring well of singular transparency situate within the park.^ It was in the time of St. John's successor, the first Lord Falkland, that the notion, not carried out till forty years later, of turning the lands into a deer park seems to have been first entertained. In 1623 a King's letter directed that one William Moore should be employed about his Majesty's park, which was to be enclosed near Dublin for the breeding of deer and the maintenance of game. But although the office of Master of the Hawks and Game had been constituted in 1605, and was at the time held by the Vice -Treasurer, Sir Thomas Ridgeway, afterwards Earl of Londonderry, it does not appear that anything was done to enclose any part of the lands of the Phoenix or to stock it with game. ' Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1615-1625, p. 246. ^ Irish Names of Places, i. p. 24. It is not certain that Dr. Joyce is correct in fixing the site of this spring as close to the Phoenix Pillar and the entrance to the Viceregal grounds. The spring at that spot would not have been on the lands originally held with the Phoenix house. Assuming the sug- gested etymology to be correct, it seems more probable that the name derives from a spring in the vicinity of the Magazine, perhaps the rivulet that runs along the valley on the north side of the Magazine Hill. It may be noted that the river Finisk which joins the Blackwater below Cappoquin is called the ' Phoenix ' by Charles Smith in his History of Waterford. E 50 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY At any rate no new Master was appointed on Eidgeway's death in 1631. For forty years from the time of its acquisition by the Crown * the House of the Phoenix ' remained the principal residence of the rulers of Ireland and their favourite resort. After Falkland's time it was occupied by the Lords Justices in the absence of the Viceroy, and the well-known Earl of Cork notes in his diary how * I and mine were this day feasted at the Phenix by the Lord of Eanelagh.' ' Strafford and Ormond, Fleetwood and Henry Cromwell, were among its successive occupants in the thirty troubled years that preceded the Bestoration. Situated on the eminence now occupied by the magazine fort, commanding the fine prospect of the Dublin hills and of the valley of the Liffey in one direction, and a far-stretching expanse of almost entirely unoccupied land in another, it was an almost ideal spot for the recreation of jaded statesmen in the intervals that great affairs afforded. Here Strafford, in the earlier years of his rule, diverted him- self with hawking, or with such substitute for his favourite sport as he was forced to improvise in a country seat in which, as he laments to his friend Cottington, * there hath not been a partridge within the memory of man.' ' To-morrow,' he writes, ' I purpose with a cast or two of spar-hawks to take myself to fly at blackbirds, ever and anon taking them on the pates with a trench. It is excellent sport, there being sometimes two hundred horse on the field looking on at us.' ^ Strafford however was not contented with the Phoenix, either as a residence or for the sport its neighbourhood afforded. He defends himself, in a letter to Laud, against a charge of extravagant expenditure on his mansion near Naas, and his park at Shillelagh, on the plea that it was * uncomely ' that his Majesty should not have a house in Ireland capable to lodge him with moderate conveniency.^ On Ormond's sur- render of Dublin to the Parliament in 1647, the Phoenix passed into the hands of the Parliamentarians, but on the Viceroy's return in June 1649, when he lay before Dublin ' Lismore Papers, 1st Ser. iii. p. 60. « Strafford's Letters, i. p 162. ' Ihid. ii. p. 105. THE PHCENIX PARK 51 prior to the disastrous battle of Kathmines, he summoned the House to surrender, and it was delivered up, but only to be reoccupied a few weeks later by the victorious forces of the Parliamentary General, Michael Jones.^ In 1652 Sir Jerome Sankey, one of the most acquisitive of the Crom- wellians, seems to have secured a promise of the place. A survey of the manor of Kilmainham was ordered by the Parliamentary Commissioners. But it does not appear how far this affair proceeded.- Later, the Phoenix was the con- stant abode of Henry Cromwell,^ man}'- of whose letters are dated from thence.* He appears to have been fond of the place and to have added considerably to the building, which, even before his improvements, was described by Sir William Petty as a very stately house and in good repair.^ Ormond, on being reinstated as Viceroy, gave order for the building of a hall and stables ; and Lord Orrery,*' who, as one of the Lords Justices pending Ormond's arrival, had charge of the improvements, suggested the addition of a chapel. But except as to the stables, these designs were not proceeded with, the larger schemes involved in the formation of the Park rendering them in part unnecessary. ' Jones is stated in a pamphlet of the day to have taken ' the Phoenix, the strong house of the Earl of Strafford near the city of Dublin ' on August 13, 1649. ^ Hardinge, ' On Surveys in Ireland,' Trans. R.I.A. vol. xxiv. ; Antiquities, p. 5. ^ ' 26 May, 1657. We all dined yesterday and took leave at the Phenix, where we found much freedom and welcome.' — Major Geo. Eawdon to Lord Conway. Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1647-1660. * ' When Sir H. Waller surprised the Castle of Dublin Henry Cromwell retired to a house in the Phoenix Park.' — Leland's History of Ireland, iii. p. 400. ^ Down Survey. " ' I am now building a house for myself in Munster, of which I am the architect, and therefore pretend something to engineership, by virtue of which I spent an hour yesterday in designing what you command should be further done at the Phcenix, which is a hall and a stable. I proposed to the Council that, to make the house uniform, the hall should be built as a room answerable to the new building Col. Harry Cromwell made ; and that to make it of even length thereunto a chapel should be added, without which your grace's family will not be a little disaccommodated. Both these will make the house uniform, and because this must be done forthwith, I proposed that the walls might be so thick as hereafter on the hall and the chapel other stories might be raised to the height of Colonel Harry's building, to which this will be opposite, and in the meantime to terrace this. This the Council approved.' — -Orrery to Ormond, December 28, 1661, Orrery's State Letters, p. 31. e2 52 ILLUSTEATIONS OP IRISH HISTORY We have now reached the time of the making of the Park. But before proceeding with the story it may be convenient to trace the subsequent history of the old Phoenix House. The Duke of Ormond was the last Viceroy to utilise it as a residence. His occupation of the dwelling must have termi- nated about 1665, when the Viceregal seat was moved, as will shortly be seen, to Chapelizod ; but the gardens and stables were maintained for many years. The house itself seems to have been given up to members of the Lord-Lieutenant's staff, and in 1719 was in the occupation of an official called the Gentleman of the Horse.^ It was still standing when, in 1734, the Duke of Dorset directed the provision of a powder magazine in such part of the Phoenix Park as might seem most proper for the purpose, and the Lords Justices, with that carelessness of historical associations by which the eighteenth century is unhappily distinguished, having fixed on the ground occupied by the old Phoenix House and stables as the most suitable spot, the Viceroy gave orders for the demolition of the buildings.^ Thus the handsome Jacobean mansion became a thing of the past, and the magazine and fort, whose erection evoked the last satiric spark emitted by Swift's expiring intellect, has ever since occupied the site of his Majesty's House of the Phoenix.^ The Duke of Ormond was appointed Lord-Lieutenant in November of 1661, the administration having been pre- viously confided to Lords Justices. But the interminable difficulties besetting the impossible task of devising an act of settlement which should reconcile the contending claims of the successive grantees of the forfeited lands of Ireland delayed his arrival in Ireland until the following July. Immediately on his appointment Ormond communicated with Sir Maurice Eustace, the Irish Chancellor and one of the Lords Justices, as to the most fitting place for the ' Estimate of repairs, 1719, British Departmental Corr., Irish Eecord Office. ^ Duke of Dorset to the Lords Justices, 8th Oct., 1734, ibid. ^ ' Behold a proof of Irish sense, Here Irish wit is seen ; When nothing's left that's worth defence They build — a magazine ! ' THE PHCENIX PAEK 53 Viceregal abode. Eustace recommended the Phoenix as a pleasant summer dwelling-house, which, moreover, was in the near neighbourhood of his own seat at Chapelizod. The Viceroy accordingly gave directions for its enlargement, and on his arrival took up his residence there.^ Preoccupied with weightier matters, Ormond's corre- spondence in 1662 throws no light on the circumstances in which the project for forming the Park originated, but there can be little doubt that it was in the neighbourly intercourse between Viceroy and Chancellor that the suggestion of -a deer-park near the Viceregal residence was first mooted. Eustace had already spent a long life mostly in official harness. Appointed Speaker of the Irish House of Com- mons, with the approval of Strafford, in 1634, he had the address to hold that office through the stormy times that followed, until the advent of Cromwell involved him in misfortunes which culminated in a seven years' captivity at Chester. Liberated in 1658, Eustace returned to Ireland, but was forbidden the exercise of his profession at the bar, at which, prior to these troubles, he had reached the rank of Prime Serjeant. At the Restoration, his sufferings were held to have earned his advancement to the highest judicial office in Ireland.^ Eustace was old enough to remember the unfulfilled plans of Falkland for the enclosure of the Crown lands of Kilmainham, and Ormond, full of schemes for the improvement of Dubhn, had a ready ally in the Chan- cellor, whose own seat at Harristown was reckoned among the stateliest homes in Ireland. It is, perhaps, doing the old gentleman no injustice to surmise that his satisfaction in the laying out of his Majesty's deer-park was not diminished by the circumstances that the scheme could not be effectually carried out without his own consent and co-operation, and that it presented an opportunity for the advantageous disposal of his property at Chapelizod. Be this as it may, it is certain that the first official mention of ' Orrery's State Letters, p. 31. - For a detailed notice of Sir Maurice Eustace, see Sovie Notes on the Irish Judiciary in the reign of Charles II., by Francis Elrington Ball. 54 ILLUSTEATIONS OP lEISH HISTOEY the Phoenix Park occurs in a King's letter, dated December 1, 1662, directed to the Lord-Lieutenant, which ratifies the purchase from Eustace of lands contiguous to the Phoenix demesne, and forming part of the manor or lordship of Chapelizod, which the Chancellor had recently acquired. The original extent of the Crown lands held with the Manor House of the Phoenix cannot have been much above four hundred acres. But by an agreement entered into at the same time as the arrangement with Eustace, about a hundred acres lying to the north-west of the Phoenix de- mesne, and known as the lands of Newtown, were acquired for a sum of 3,000Z.^ This purchase was not completed until 1671, but the lands, which included the site of the present Viceregal Lodge, were at once taken over and walled in. Thus the Park, as at first contemplated, comprised little more than a thousand acres. This was speedily found to be insufficient, and in May 1663 a further King's letter ^ ' Howard's Exchequer and Revenue of Ireland, ii. p. 261. - The following is the full text of the King's letter to the Duke of Ormond, giving authority for the purchase of further lands for the Phoenix Park : ' Charles R. 1663, May 26. Whitehall Right trusty and right entirely beloved Cousin and Counsellor, We greet you well ; whereas by our letters under our privy signet and sign manual, bearing date the first day of December last, We did authorise you to satisfy unto Sir Maurice Eustace, knight, our Chancellor of Ireland, for the purchase of four hundred forty-one acres of the land of Chappell Izard, to be laid unto our manor house of the Phenix, as by the said letter doth appear, and whereas the quantity of lands designed to make a park for our use near the Phenix do amount to a larger quantity, and will cost more money than we were informed of at the passing our said letter, and that we are now resolved to buy the whole manor and house of Chappell Izard, with the town and lands thereunto belonging, and several other lands which be most convenient to enclose for a park : We do therefore very well approve of your proceedings herein already made, and do by these our letters authorise you to purchase from our said Chancellor, and any other persons having title thereunto, such lands, tenements, and hereditaments for our use as you shall think fit, and to give order to our right trusty and right well-beloved Cousin and Counsellor, Arthur, Earl of Anglesey, or any other Vice-Treasurer for the time being, for satisfaction of the purchase money that shall be agreed to be paid, so as the same amount not in the whole to above the sum of ten thousand pounds, and also to enclose or impark with a stone wall, in such manner as you have already begun, such lands of our ancient inheritance, or new purchase, as you shall judge fit for that use, and to store the same with deer, giving order to our said Vice-Treasurer or any other Vice-Treasurer for the time being, to make payment of such sums of money from time to time as shall be requisite THE PHCENIX PAKK 55 authorised the purchase from Eustace of ' the whole manor and house of Chappell Izard with the town and lands there- unto belonging, and several other lands which be most con- venient to enclose for a park.' ' The purchase-money was fixed at a maximum of 10,000^., the precise sum being left to arbitration. By the same authority the Lord-Lieutenant was further directed ' to enclose or impark with a stone wall, in such manner as you have already begun, such lands of our ancient inheritance, or new purchase, as you shall judge fit for that use, and to store the same with deer.' Pursuant to these instruotions, lands were accordingly ac- quired from various persons in Grangegorman and Castle- knock ; but it was soon evident that the Park was likely to prove far more costly than had been anticipated. Chapel- izod alone absorbed the whole of the original 10,000Z. : ^ a sum much in excess of its value, if, as Lord Essex subse- quently reported, the lands had never been worth more than 330Z. a year in the best times. ^ By 1665 it had become necessary to provide a further sum of 10,000Z. to satisfy the other proprietors.^ Between 1665 and 1669 there were for doing the said work, and for so doing this shall be a sufficient warrant to you and to our said Vice-Treasurer and to all whom it may concern ; Given at our Court at Whitehall, the xxvith day of May, 1663, in the fifteenth year of our reign. By His Majesty's commands, Henry Bennet.' — Ormonde Papers, New Series, iii. p. 55. ' The vicars of the parishes affected as to tithes or otherwise by the making of the Park were compensated in various degrees. Thus by grant from Charles II. to Dr. James Hierome, Vicar of Chapelizod, dated July 14, 1668, the vicar for the time being for 99 years from that date was entitled to graze two horses and eight cows in the Phoenix Park. See Erck's Ecclesiastical Register, pp. 85-90, as to the rights of the vicars of Castleknock and St. James's respectively. - King's Letter, 11th May, 1665, Ormonde Papers, New Ser. iii. ^ Christie's Life of Shaftesbury, ii. App. p. 53. * In the will of Sir Maurice Eustace, made on June 20, 1665, and proved Sept. 20, 1670, occurs the following passage : — ' I give to my nephew. Sir Maurice Eustace, all my lands in the county of Dublin, except my manor of Chapel Izod, which I give to his Majesty King Charles the Second for ever, according to an agreement entered into with him, he paying such money as remains due according to the said agreement.' — Orig. Will, Irish Eecord OflSce. The act of settlement and explanation (17 and 18 Charles II.) (1664) contained a provision for payment of the balance due to the executors of the late Sir Maurice Eustace, Knt., and for vesting the lands of Chapel Izod in his Majesty, his heirs and successors for ever. 66 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY several further purchases, of which the most considerable was the acquisition at a cost of 2,270L of the lands of Ash- town with the castle thereon, being the site of the lodge and grounds now occupied by the Under-Secretary, An account presented in 1669 of the expenditure in respect of the Phoenix Park shows an actual outlay at that date of upwards of 18,000^., and a liability of 12,000?., making a total of above 31, 000 L^ Provision was made accordingly ; but even this large amount did not suffice, the total cost ultimately exceeding 40,000Z.2 As a result of these various additions, the area enclosed in the Park, inclusive of Kilmainham, amounted to above 2,000 acres, or considerably more than its present extent. Ormond had meanwhile lost no time in proceeding with his plans. A contract, which was speedily, if not very effectually, carried out, was entered into for building a wall. The lands on both sides of the river were enclosed by a stone wall which ran down to the river at each side at a point just west of the covered portion of the modern Kingsbridge Station. Those on the south bank of the Liffey embraced the whole space now comprised in the grounds of the Eoyal Hospital, the boundary running southwards from the Liffey by the present Military Road, turning westward near Bow Bridge and following the course of Kilmainham Lane as far as St. John's Eoad, whence it ran northwards again to Island Bridge. The contract for building the Park wall was given to one Dodson. Many of the accounts of this worthy are extant, together with the reports of the officials to whom they were referred by the Irish Privy Council. They make decidedly piquant reading, and suffice to prove that our much-abused Board of Works is after all an improvement on seventeenth- century methods. Dodson for years enjoyed a free hand and a most desirable job. His original estimate amounted to above 4,0001., and specified a wall 10 feet high and 2 feet ' Account of moneys paid for land in Phoenix Park, Ormonde Papers, New Ser. iii. 293-5. The precise sum was 31,498L Is. 8d. 2 Exshaw's Magazine, 1775, p. 213, and Freeman's Journal, Feb. 7, 1775. THE PHOENIX PAEK 57 6 inches thick ; and by 1667 Dodson had executed, without demur by the Paymaster, work to the nominal value of 6,000/. This, one would suppose, should have provided a sufficiently secure enclosure. The contractor was injudi- cious enough, however, to demand 100/. a year for keeping his own work in repair. This led to investigation. A committee of inquiry reported that the 6,000/. expended should have sufficed to erect a wall durable enough to obviate such early need of repair, and certified that the walls were for the most part so badly executed that they could not be repaired without being taken down and relaid. These defects, which they attributed as well to the badness of the material as to the incompetence of the workmen employed, could scarcely be surprising if, as reported by the com- mittee, Dodson had agreed with his sub-contractors to do for 30/. that for which he was being paid 100/.^ As erected by Dodson, the wall, following the exact bounds of the lands, ran in a somewhat irregular course ; following on the north the old Castleknock road, and embracing on the south the meadows by the Liffey on which the Kingsbridge Terminus now stands.'^ In 1671 it ' Eeport of Sir Wm. Flower and others, Oct. 27, 1668, Ormonde Papers, New Ser. iii. p. 291. - A Survey of part of Newtown and Kilmainbam left out of Phoenix Park by making the wall straight, by Thomas Taylor, 1671. Irish Kecord Office. Boundary of the lands of Kilmainbam and Newtown. The demesne lands of Kilmainbam and Newtown, which were vested in the Crown, and which were granted by King James I. to Sir Edward Fisher, in the year 1611, and again repurchased by the same King in 1617, were bounded as follows : — On the south by the river Liffey from the weir at Island Bridge, eastward to Ellen Hore's meadow, now part of Conyngham Road, and Parkgate Street ; east by the rivulet dividing the said lands of Newtown from Oxmantown lands, which rivulet still forms the boundary between the People's Gardens and the Royal Military Infirmary ; west and south-west by the lands of Ashtown, Castleknock, and Chapelizod, by an imaginary line from a point in the Viceregal demesne nearly opposite the entrance gate into the Phoenix Park from Blackhorse Lane, almost dividing the Viceregal lodge into two ; thence westward to about 80 yards east of the Phoenix Column ; thence southward and eastward to a point about 100 yards west of the Magazine Fort ; thence south to the weir at Island Bridge. This boundary line may be seen on the Ordnance map (sheet 18) of the county of Dublin, and still forms the boundary line dividing the parish of St. James (the original parish of Kilmainbam) from the parishes of Castleknock and Chapel- izod. —Evans. The inforiiiation in this note is taken from a manuscript on 58 ILLUSTKATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY was resolved to straighten the walls, and several small lots on each side of the river, inclusive of these meadows and amounting to some six acres, were left out. As thus modi- fied, the Park remained unchanged for the next ten years, until, in consequence of the assignment by the king of sixty- four acres on the south side for the use of the newly founded Royal Hospital, the whole of the lands lying south of the Liffey were alienated from the Park. Advantage was taken of this circumstance to obviate the inconvenience caused by the public road to Chapelizod running through the Park : an arrangement which, coupled with Dodson's sorry boundary walls, had been found to lead to the frequent injury and loss of the deer. It was accordingly determined to limit the Park to the lands on the north side of the Liffey, taking the Chapelizod road as the boundary. Dodson being by this time discredited, it was necessary to find a fresh contractor, and for the construction of the new wall a curious arrange- ment was entered into with a public servant of high distinc- tion. Sir John Temple, who held the ofiice of Solicitor- General from the Restoration to the Revolution, had inherited from his father, the well-known author of a history of the Rebellion, and long the Master of the Rolls in Ireland, large interests in the neighbourhood of the Park which he was desirous of increasing. He now added to his eminent legal functions the role of builder and contractor, and undertook to build a wall eight feet high from the Park Gate to Chapelizod, in consideration of the sum of 200Z., and of a grant of the lands thus omitted from the Park between the road and the river. The contract was duly carried out. The Park assumed the shape it has ever since substantially retained,^ and the strip of land lying along the river bank the Phamix Pai'k by the late well-known Dublin antiquary, Mr. Evans, who was working at the subject shortly before his lamented death, and whose notes on the Park were subsequently acquired by the writer at the sale of his books. Subsequent notes from this source are marked Evans. ' So far as the writer is aware, no alteration in the line of the boundary walls seems to have taken place from the erection of Temple's wall until 178G, when the limits of the Park were slightly curtailed at the eastern boundary, near Park Gate, to enable the Wide Street Commissioners to widen the road leading from Barrack Street to Island Bridge. THE PHCENIX PARK 59 from Kjngsbridge to Chapelizod was added to the possessions of the Temples of Palmerstown.' Meantime neither the delinquencies of Dodson nor the subsequent alteration in the scope of the Park had been allowed to delay the equipment of the lands as a deer-park. Deer were brought from England ; ^ and Marcus Trevor, Viscount Dungannon, who had already received a patent as Master of his Majesty's Game and Parks in Ireland, was designated as Eanger in 1668. Two keepers were at the same time appointed. There appears also to have been an intention to create an office higher than either of these, that of Lieutenant of the Park, which was intended by Ormond to be held by his son, the gifted Earl of Ossory, in conjunction with the house at Chapelizod acquired from Sir Maurice Eustace.^ This idea, which was taken from the constitution of the Eoyal Park at Woodstock, as well as a proposed designation of the Park as Kingsborough Park, was abandoned, and the offices created were confined to those of the Ranger, who was also keeper of the walk of Newtown, with a residence on the site of the present Vice- regal Lodge, and of two keepers, one for what was called Kilmainham walk, and the other for the lodge and walk of Ashtown. The Kilmainham keepership was apparently abolished when the lands south of the Liffey were assigned to the Royal Hospital. But another was established at ' The following lands and buildings left outside by the new walls were omitted from the grant to Temple : — ' Neither the house at Chapel Izard, nor the courtyards or gardens thereunto belonging, nor the bleaching-yard there, nor the mills or weirs of Kilmainham, or the washhouse there, nor the sixty-four acres of land by oure letters set apart for the new hospital there be contained in such grant.' See the patent at Irish Eecord OfiSce. - Lord Dungannon in his capacity of Kanger lost no time in storing the park with deer. The account of expenditure already cited includes two items of 2001. each in successive yeai's for his purchase of deer stock ; and sums of Sil. and 591. for bringing them over. The deer came mostly from the south of England, and some not improbably from Woodstock, which in the patent appointing Dungannon is quoted as the model of a royal park, and was then well stocked with deer. See, as to the stocking of the deer, Eussell and Pren- dergast's Report on the Carte Papers, pj). 191-2 ; and, as to Deer Parks in Ireland, an excellent paper by Mr. T. P. Le Fanu on ' The Eoyal Forest of Glencree,' Journal of the Eoyal Society of Antiq^uaries of Ireland, 1893, p. 268. ^ Draft King's Letter to Attorney-General, Ormonde MSS., undated. 60 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Castleknock Gate, with a residence on the site of Mount- joy Barracks. The separate establishment of Ranger and keeper lasted far into the eighteenth century ; the last to hold the Eangership as a separate office being Nathaniel Clements, the builder of the Viceregal Lodge. In 1785 the two offices were amalgamated in the person of Sackville Hamilton, then Under-Secretary, and thenceforward were held for many years, together with the Lodge of Ashtown, by the Under-Secretary for the time being. This latter arrange- ment lasted without interruption down to 1830, when the control of the Park was handed over to the Commissioners of Woods and Forests,^ the predecessors of the Board of Works. Ten years later, on the death of Thomas Drum- mond, who was the last Under-Secretary to hold the position, the office of Ranger of the Phoenix Park was finally abolished.^ But the charming residence in the Park, formerly Ashtown Castle, and certain delectable perquisites in the shape of venison from the Park preserves, survive to remind the present occupant of the ancient glories of his office.^ A public improvement on a scale so magnificent naturally attracted attention, and the opulent possibilities of a demesne so close to the capital to which Ormond had successfully attracted the Irish nobility as a place of residence soon ex- cited the cupidity of the rapacious favourites who thronged the Court of St. James. Ormond, entangled in the same web of intrigue which had procured the disgrace of his old friend Clarendon, was removed from his post in 1668. ' Statute 10 Geo. IV., cap. 50. - Letter from the Commissioners of Woods, &e.. to Lord Morpeth, Irish State Paper Office. The writer has to thank Sir David Harrel, late Under-Secretary at Dublin Castle, for this reference. For a list of the Bangers see p. 73 infra. ' Various official notabilities seem to have enjoyed these perquisites in the eighteenth century. The following were among the regular recipients between 1765 and 1777 : The Lord Mayor of Dublin, the Sheriffs, the Lord Primate, the Lord Chancellor, the Attorney-General, the Solicitor-General, the Prime Sei'jeant, and the Commissioner of Kevenue. The Master of the Guild of Merchants received a brace of bucks ' every third year when the franchises are ridden.' Brit. Dep. Corr., Irish Record OfiSce. THE PHCENIX PARK 61 With the withdrawal of his authority, the future of the Park he had been at such pains to form was soon endangered.^ It was first promised to the ill-starred Duke of Monmouth, who, however, withdrew his request for it in deference to the remonstrances evoked from Ireland by the proposal. But ere long the Park became the subject of a more serious intrigue. On the death of Lord Dungannon in 1672, the Kangership was bestowed on Sir Henry, afterwards Lord Brouncker, a Court favourite with a shady reputation, whose sufficient epitaph is an unsavoury paragraph in Pepys's ' Diary,' but who should be mentioned with charity as the brother of the first President of the Koyal Society.^ Brouncker belonged to the section of Charles II. 's Court which, before she had been superseded in the royal graces by younger rivals, revolved in the brilliant orbit of Barbara Villiers, Duchess of Cleveland. To her the new Ranger suggested that a grant of the Phcenix Park would be a fruitful source of enrichment, and this was readily accorded by the easy Sovereign. Instructions to pass the patent were sent to Arthur Capel, Lord Essex, who had shortly before entered on a Viceroyalty still commemorated in Dublin by Capel Street and, until recently, by Essex Bridge.^ The action of Essex on the occasion was worthy of a statesman who has left a name among the most honourable in the eminent roll of Irish Viceroys. Like Chichester sixty-six years earlier, in the case of Sir Richard Sutton, he suspended the patent till the King could be brought to consider his objections ; and he wrote energetically to Arlington, Shaftesbury, and other Ministers, desiring them to exert their influence to procure a revocation of the grant. The Duchess, however, though past ' Essex Papers, ed. Osmund Airy, Camden Society's Publications, i. p. 59. - ' Henry Brouncker erected a large brick house on that portion of Oxman- town hill which was added to the Newtown lands, overlooking the pond, which he named Newtown Lodge, and which was the first olBcial residence (other than the Phcenix House built by Fisher) erected within the Park ; and so continued till about 1760. Thenceforth it was the residence of the deer keepers till 1835, when all the land enclosed with it was granted to the Zoological Society and Newtown Lodge was demolished. This lodge was long known as the Ivy House.' — Evans. ' Renamed Grattan Bridge in 1875. 62 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY the zenith of her charms, still retained much of her influence with Charles, and not many were willing to peril their own positions by thwarting so powerful a personage. It took two months of incessant remonstrance to prevail with the King to cancel his gift, and even then Charles only did so upon a promise that lands to the value of 1,000?. a year should be found for the disappointed lady.^ Essex was much assisted in his representations by his predecessor, who was keenly desirous of preserving the Park to the Crown and the capital. It was on this occasion that Ormond met the angry and unmannerly reproaches of the Duchess of Cleveland with the admirable example of the retort-com'teous recorded by Carte. Meeting the Duke at Court her Grace publicly up- braided him with his opposition to her interests, conclud- ing an animated tirade with the expression of her hope that she might live to see him hanged. To all which Ormond, having heard the frail beauty out, only replied that he was not in so much haste to put an end to her Grace's days, for all he wished in regard to her was that he might live to see her old.^ A further attempt to procure a grant of the Park seems to have been made in 1679 by Sir James Edwardes, but this also was defeated by the intervention of Ormond.^ We have already seen that the lands acquired from Sir Maurice Eustace included the mansion-house of Chapelizod, which had been occupied for some time by the Chancellor as his residence. How Eustace had become possessed of this property does not precisely appear, but in 1657 the house had been in the occupation of Colonel Theophilus Jones, a soldier who, alike under protectorate and monarchy, succeeded in securing his full share of the good things that were going in ' Essex Letters from Ireland in 1675. And see the Essex Papers, i. p. 58. Several letters of Essex on the same subject not printed by Mr. Airy are in the British Museum (Stowe MSS. vol. eci.). - The date— 1664— assigned by Carte to this incident is manifestly in- correct. There were other and potent causes for Barbara Villiers's dislike of Ormond. It is recorded of his Duchess that ' she was very stiff with regard to the King's mistresses ; and would never wait on the Duchess of Cleveland, who in return never forgave the slight.' — Carte, ii. pp. 276, 587. 2 Russell and Prendergast's Report on the Carte Papers, p. 18-i. THE PHCENIX PAEK 63 an era of confiscation. Jones had, however, incurred the suspicion of the Parliamentary leaders in 1659, and had quitted Dublin for a time, and it was, perhaps, from David Edwards, who appears in the Census of 1659 as among the three ' tituladoes ' of Chapelizod, that Eustace had purchased it in the following year. The house with its garden stood between the river and the Chapelizod road, a little beyond the present Koman Catholic church. The green meadows, margined by a few decaying remnants of formerly abundant timber, which run down to the north bank of the Liffey, a little westward of the new University Boat Club premises on the opposite side, still reveal to a careful survey some traces of their former stateliness. When first taken over by Ormond, the house and grounds lay within the Park. Though excluded from its precincts by Sir John Temple's wall, they were excepted from the grant of severed land by which Temple was remunerated, and preserved as the Viceregal residence, a character which they retained for a full century from their first acquisition by the Crown. Here a succession of Viceroys and Deputies, including Ormond himself, his sons Lords Ossory and Arran,^ Essex, Clarendon, and Tyrconnel, constantly resided down to the Revolution ; and though the straitened finances of the times could not afford any large expenditure on the place, the King's House was evidently regarded by its tenants as a desirable abode. Essex, in the correspondence already re- ferred to, dwells with animation on the importance of the Park residence as an alternative to the unwholesomeness of the Castle, and from the correspondence of Henry, Lord Clarendon, who preceded Tyrconnel as Viceroy, some idea of its character may be gleaned. Both Clarendon and his wife were correspondents of the accomplished Evelyn. The Countess — ' a blue who looked like a madwoman and talked like a scholar' — writes to the author of ' Sylva,' lamenting her coming to a country which he had not cultivated, but with evident enjoyment of her surroundings, though ' Lord Arran's first wife, Lady Mary Stewart, died at the King's House, July 4, 1668. 64 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTOEY she deplored a deficiency of trees and shrubs. Clarendon himself describes to the same friend the fertility of the extensive kitchen gardens attached to the place, dwell- ing with the gusto of a gourmand on the excellence of the asparagus.' Clarendon was followed at Chapelizod by Tyrconnel, who lay ill there before joining James II. in the decisive struggle for the crown of the Three King- doms. The next occupant of ' the King's House ' was the victor of the Boyne. William III., the only Sovereign prior to George IV. who at any time dwelt in any of the residences attached to the Park, came to Chapelizod at the end of the stirring month which witnessed the defeat of his rival. Three royal proclamations, one of them ordain- ing a day of humiliation and prayer ' for the future progress of our arms and a speedy enjoyment of peace and quietness in the land,' are dated from ' Our Court at Chapelizod.' '^ After William's departure the King's House continued to be utilised by his representatives ; but from the death of Henry, Lord Capel, which unfortunately occurred there in 1701, the place seems to have had no attraction for succeed- ing Governors. The Viceroys of the eighteenth century were, in any case, for the most part absentees, and from the accession of George I. it does not appear that many of them resided at Chapelizod. Deserted by the Viceroys, the house was given over to the Lords Justices, and was allowed to fall into con- siderable decay. But the Duke of Grafton and Lord Galway, who governed Ireland as Lords Justices during the Vice- royalty of the Duke of Shrewsbury, effected some improve- ments. Lord Galway erected a pigeon-house which still stands in the grounds. Primate Boulter,"* who obtained leave from Lord Carteret to occupy the place, made some attempt towards restoring it in 1726, and for some years the King's House seems to have recovered its former glory. The Duke of Dorset, whose Court was of exceptional brilliancy, resided there in 1731, and it is at this date that we find the entertaining ' See also Clarendon's State Letters, ii. p. 100, both as to the maintenance of Chapelizod and the condition of Dublin Castle. ^ Ormonde Papers, ii. pp. 443, 445. ' Primate Boulter's Letters, i. pp. 116-122 ; ii. pp. 139, 140. Dublin edition. THE PHCENIX PAEK 65 Mrs. Delany, then Mrs. Pendarves, describing the attractions of the Park with her usual sprightliness. ' It is,' she writes, ' a large extent of ground, very fine turf, agreeable prospects, and a delightful wood, in the midst of which is a ring where the beaux and belles resort in fair weather. Indeed, I never saw a spot of ground more to my taste : it is far beyond St. James's or Hyde Park.' ^ The ring referred to was the open space in which the Phoenix Column now stands, and was at that time entirely, as it is still in part, surrounded by trees.^ The latest reference to the King's House as an official residence occurs in another letter from the same accom- plished lady, who in May 1750 dined at Chapelizod, ' a sweet place about two miles from Dublin, belonging to the Government,' then lent to William Barnard, the Bishop of Derry, who doubtless owed the privilege to his connection with the most eminent of the then Lords Justices, the masterful Primate Stone. In 1743 the house was put in order for the reception of Lord Chesterfield, but that noble- man, though he greatly admired the Park and exerted himself to improve it, seems to have resided at the Castle during his stay in Dublin. From this time forward the place ceased to be valued except for the extensive gardens attached to it, which were abundantly stocked with fruit trees and vegetables. The house fell year by year into ever-increasing decay ; and the State records contain many piteous appeals from its custodians for the execution of the repairs necessary to prevent absolute dilapidation.^ Ultimately, on the arrival of the Duke of Bedford in 1758, it was determined to dispense with the residence, and the King's House was two years later given over to his Majesty's Eegiment of Artillery as quarters for the officers of that corps. As such Correspondence of Mrs. Delany, i. p. 294, and v. p. 547. ^ ' About ten acres of the land adjacent to the Phoenix Column was beauti- fully laid out in square plots, planted with flowering shrubs and evergreens and gravel walks by Lord Chesterfield for the benefit and enjoyment of the citizens of Dublin. All these improvements are still to be seen laid down on Eocque's Map of the County of Dublin, 1756.' — Evans. ^ British Departmental Correspondence, Irish Record Office. F 66 ILLUSTKATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY it continued to be utilised for the next sixty years or so, and readers of Le Fanu's tale of ' The House by the Churchyard ' will remember references to the King's House in this capacity. In 1832 the place with its adjoining ground was sold by the Government. Thenceforward the very name of the King's House was lost save as a local tradition, though it is still retained on the maps of the Ordnance Survey. The building itself was destroyed by fire and replaced by a modern house. Only some out-houses, the pigeon-house already referred to, and an ornamental pond in the grounds survive to mark the site of the last royal residence in Ireland. Though Chapelizod as a residence began to go out of fashion with the opening of George II. 's reign, the Park, as a place of resort, continued popular, and efforts were made by more than one Lord-Lieutenant to contribute to its improvement. In the public mind no name is so closely associated with the Phoenix Park as that of the fourth Earl of Chesterfield. But curiously little evidence remains to attest that viceroy's share in its improvement and the interest he undoubtedly took in it, beyond the substantial memorial which the Phoenix Pillar still affords, and in which he embalmed that misconception of the origin of the name of the Park which he was the first to consecrate with official authority. The tradition of the probable origin of the name, already mentioned, was doubtless lost through the transference of the Viceregal seat from the Phoenix House to Chapelizod, and the non-residence of the Viceroys for a long period. The Irish Court of the first half of the eighteenth century knew little and, if possible, cared less about Irish etymology, and the confusion of the name with the mythical bird was a natural one in a nobleman who affected a classical elegance in his correspondence. Even before Chesterfield's time, Mrs. Delany, in the letter already quoted, displayed the same misapprehension of the meaning of the name, and wrote of ' the Park, justly called the Phoenix,' as though the title had been chosen in boastful assertion of the superiority of the Park to all other places of the kind. Lord THE PHCENIX PARK 67 Chesterfield undoubtedly did a good deal to improve the appearance of the Park by judicious planting, and greatly increased its attraction to the citizens of Dublin by forming a road planted with elms on either side, which was long known as, and still deserves to be denominated, the Chesterfield Eoad. But neither his published letters nor those still ex- tant in manuscript in the Newcastle Papers at the British Museum contain any references to the improvements he effected.^ For many years after the abandonment of the King's House the representatives of the Crown in Ireland remained without any official residence, and the improvidence which had surrendered Chapelizod must have been lamented by Lord Townshend and his successors when, in 1767, Chatham ordained that the King's Lieutenants should reside in Ireland. Townshend apparently entertained some idea of building a mansion in the Park, but did not remain in the Government long enough to give effect to it.- His successor, Lord Harcourt, lived at St. Wolfstan's, near Lucan. It was not until 1781 that steps were taken by the then Vice- roy, Lord Carlisle, and his Chief Secretary, William Eden, afterwards Lord Auckland, towards acquiring the resi- dences of the Park officials for the use of the Government. ' ' Lord Chesterfield constructed a new road through the Park from the Dublin gate to Castleknock. On either side of this road he planted elm trees in clumps of seven or eight each, many of which are yet standing. . . . This old road made by Lord Chesterfield is yet to be seen, together with the clumps of old elms which oi-namented it, viz. : from the road leading to the Zoological Gardens at the Gough Statue, along through the nine acres, now the polo ground, close to the Viceregal demesne and out at the Phoenix Column ; thence in a southerly course intersecting the roads leading to Knockmaroon.and to the Mountjoy Barracks, now the Ordnance Survey Office, and again taking a northerly bend terminated at Castleknock Gate ; but outside that gate it was continued to Castleknock, as at present. The whole extent of this old road from Park Gate Street to Castleknock Gate appears on Sheet 18 of the early Ordnance Map of Dublin, on which the proposed new road (made in 1805 by the Board of Woods and Forests) is marked with dotted lines.' — Evans. '^ Just before this date the Hibernian School was founded. The original grant of land by the Crown in 1766 was ' a piece of land, part of our Phcenix Park, next adjoining to our Garden at Chapelizod containing 3 acres Irish measure.' But a year later, it being pointed out that the low situation selected was unwholesome, the present site of the School was granted instead. F 2 68 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY Of these there were then four : — the lodges respectively belonging to the Eanger, the Bailiff, the Keeper, and Charles Gardiner, afterwards Lord Mountjoy. The third of these was then occupied, as already explained, by the Under- Secretary, in his capacity of Keeper, while the fourth was in the possession of Gardiner, by whom it had been built, and who had retained it as private property after the surrender of a patent as Keeper which he had obtained in 1756. The Ranger at this time was the Right Hon. Nathaniel Clements, father of the first Lord Leitrim, who, shortly after his appointment in 1751, had built the present Viceregal Lodge on the site of the old lodge of Newtown. Negotiations for the acquisition of this house for the use of the Lord- Lieutenant were entered into in 1781, and in July of the following year were completed by the payment to Mr. Robert Clements of a sum of 10,000^.^ The Park appears to have been well cared for by the Ranger and other officials responsible for it down to the accession of George II. ; and in the departmental corre- spondence at the Irish Record Office down to that date are frequent references to expenditure on drainage and repairs to roads. ^ A very considerable part of the Park, especially that in the neighbourhood of the Phoenix Pillar and Vice- regal Lodge, is naturally of a very swampy and boggy char- acter ; and large sums were required to drain the surface and make the roads sound. In the middle of the eighteenth century much less attention seems to have been bestowed ' Letter from Sackville Hamilton, July 13, 1782. Irish Eecord Office. - ' November, 1782 — Phoenix Park — I saw with Mr. Clements a plan of improvements proposed to be made in the Phoenix Park by James Donnell. He therein proposes to plant it in many places, to remove some of the clumps of trees planted by Lord Chesterfield in order to abolish regularity ; to drain and make new roads, to build a masked bridge across the pond next Dublin Gate ; to build a triangular tower or observatory, with round towers at each corner ; but where this should be erected he does not mention. This man lately lived with Lady Massereene at Leixlip as gardener, &c., but from his map, he must have some knowledge of surveying, as well as that of gardening and improvement. He was last year employed by Mr. Eden, Secretary to Lord Carlisle, to drain the S. side of the 15 acres, and level all the small ditches about it ; also to make several additional plantations, as at the wall behind Chapelizod, the Ring, &c., &c.' — Diary of Austm Cooper. THE PHCENIX PAEK 69 on these matters, and the soil relapsed, as boggy land is apt to do, to its original character. At the time when the Viceregal Lodge was acquired by the Government, dete- rioration had spread to a very serious extent. ' The roads and surface of this Park continue in a damned state,' wrote Eden to Sir John Blaquiere in 1781.^ Owing, as the Chief Secretary complained, to the number of the * co-existing potentates of the Park,' it was difficult to fix responsibility on anyone ; so that between Ranger, Keeper, and Bailiff, what was everyone's business was nobody's business, and the due care of the place was scandalously neglected.^ In another letter, Eden called the Bailiff's attention to the grievous results of this carelessness. ' Two or three hundred tents,' he wrote, ' for the sale of whisky were permitted to be established in the beginning of last week, and are still standing in full vigour, to the great detriment of the trees and turf, and the destruction of the cows, sheep, and deer,' ^ ' Auckland MSS., Aug. 25, 1781 ; Addit. MS. Brit. Mus. 34418, f. 60. 2 June 6, 1781, Addit. MS. 34417. ' It would appear from the following extract from the Life of Thomas Druminond, the well-known Under Secretary for Ireland under Lord Melbourne's administration, that this nuisance remained unabated for something like half a century : — ' The following account of the suppression by Mr. Drummond of the fairs that formerly used to be held on Sundays in the Phoenix Park is supplied by his sister : -" On the Sunda afternoons and evenings crowds used to assemble in the Phoenix Park. Drinking booths were opened, and few Sundays passed without riot and mischief ensuing. My brother talked over the matter with some friends, who told him he must not dream of interfering, because it was a very old custom, and it would not do to attempt to put it down. He resolved, how- ever, that he would make the attempt ; so one Sunday afternoon, the people having assembled as usual, and the booths being erected, he rode out unattended among the crowd. To the keeper of the nearest booth he represented the con- sequences of the meetings — drunkenness, brawls, fighting, and then punishment. He said these things were to him very painful, and that it would give him great satisfaction could the meetings be altogether given up. The man immediately, without a word of remonstrance, complaint, or even a show of suUenness, set about packing up. He quickly left the grounds, and never returned again. The same result followed at other booths, and in a short time the Park was cleared, and the 'old custom' given up for ever." There is evidence that he did not leave the result to depend altogether on moral suasion. As Hanger of the Park, he issued placards prohibiting the meetings ; and for several succes- sive Sundays he massed the police in considerable force in the neighbourhood of the Park, to make effectual the prohibition.' — M'Lennan's Memoirs of Tliomas Drummond, p. 404. 70 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY It appears from other sources that Blaquiere had given disgracefully little attention to the proper keeping of the Park, and that in his anxiety to make a profit out of the right of grazing which was a part of his patent he had greatly injured the deer.^ The Government appears to have quickly repented of its purchase of the Lodge ; for it was no sooner acquired by Lord Carlisle than his successor, the Duke of Portland, sought to get rid of it, and the political circumstances of the moment suggested a graceful occasion for disposing of what the new Viceroy evidently regarded as a white elephant. It was proposed to present the Lodge and grounds to Henry Grattan, and thus to associate the Crown with the people in doing honour to the illustrious author of the legislative liberties which had just been conceded to Ireland. Mr. Connolly was accordingly deputed to assure the House of Commons ' that the Duke of Portland felt equally with the Irish people the high value of Mr. Grattan's services to Ireland, and that, as the highest proof he could give of his admiration and respect, the Lord-Lieutenant begged to offer, as part of the intended grant to Mr. Grattan, the Viceregal Palace in the Phoenix Park, to be settled on Mr. Grattan and his heirs for ever as a suitable residence for so meritorious a person.' So flattering an ojQfer, conveyed in a manner so gracious, as the gift of the King's only palace in Ireland, seemed likely for a moment to achieve the impossible, and to unite the Government and people of Ireland in the person of Grattan. But it was only for a moment. The Opposition soon affected to discover that the Viceregal compliment was no better than a base attempt to divide the merit of the nation's gift to its liberator between the people and the Mini- stry. As Sir Jonah Barrington puts it, ' this magnificent and unexampled offer, at first view, appeared flattering and showy, at the second it appeared deceptions, and at the third inadmissible ' ; and the offer was eventually declined.^ ' Wm. Low to Nathaniel Clements, March 23, 1778, Brif. Dep. Cai-r., 1760- 1789, Irish Record Office. - Sir Jonah Barrington's Historic Memoirs of Ireland, ii. p. 34. See also as to this episode Lecky's History of England, iv. p. 559. THE PHCENIX PAKK 71 The Lodge now known as the Chief Secretary's was acquired from Sir John Blaquiere at the same time.^ It is the latest in date of the existing Lodges in the Park, and the circumstances in which it originated deserve to be noticed. The patents of appointment of the Keepers of the Park required the holders ' faithfully and diligently to discharge and execute the office and trust of keeper, and either in person or by some trusty servant, constantly to walk the round of the said Park.' ^ The patentees, being gentlemen of position, invariably discharged their duties through a deputy known as the bailiff. For this functionary a salary of 9^, with living allowances and a small residence, was provided in the estimates, and the office became in time the subject of an eminently characteristic eighteenth-century job. On the death, in 1774, of one Crosthwaite, who had for many years filled the office of bailiff, the well-known politician, Sir John Blaquiere,' then Irish Secretary in Lord Harcourt's administration, had procured for himself the appointment to this humble berth. He had at the same time obtained a lease of a plot of land adjacent to the bailiff's lodge, which he proceeded to enclose, and on which a hand- some house was thereupon erected at the public expense. Blaquiere being at the time unpopular, the job created a great outcry ; and the Opposition, fastening on the trans- action as a convenient weapon for attacking the Government, the enclosure of the ground granted to Blaquiere was represented as an alienation to private aggrandisement of lands dedicated to the public use. Proceedings were taken to test his title,"* and the Grand Jury of the County Dublin presented for the removal of the wall round the ground of the new Lodge *as an encroachment on the public and a nuisance to his Majesty's subjects, who have been accustomed to pass on horseback from time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary.' Thereupon the ' Country Letters, Irish Record Office. - Ormond to Flower, May 28, 1664. Carte Papers, Bodleian Library. ^ Howard's Parliamentary History of Ireland, 3rd Eep. of Hist. MSS. Conim. App. p. 433. See also Walker's Hibernian Magazine for 1775. ^ Affidavit of John Morrison, Dec. 19, 1774, Crown Office, King's Bench. 72 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Crown was obliged to defend the exercise of the prerogative in the grant to Blaquiere, and apphcation was made to the King's Bench to quash the presentment.^ The application was at first refused by the Court, but an issue being directed to ascertain the question of the title of the Crown, a trial at bar ensued at Green Street in which the circumstances under which the Park was formed were put in evidence. The jury, finding in favour of the traverser, the character of the Park as the property of the Crown was thereby established, and the presentment was quashed.^ Sir John Blaquiere remained in the enjoyment of the Lodge until 1782, several years after he had ceased to be Secretary, when he was so fortunate as to receive 7,000Z. from the Government, as the price of the surrender of a lease for three lives, under which he held the house which the State had built for him. Yelverton, who was one of the counsel in support of the presentment, made the capture by Blaquiere of the petty employment of Bailiff the target for much forensic ridicule, and the nickname of ' the King's Cowboy,' which the great advocate applied to him, stuck to the Secretary for a long time. Some mock- heroic verses, entitled, ' Blaquiere's Triumph,' appeared in the Freeman'' s Journal,^ and a less ephemeral memorial of an incident which furnished much amusement to the wits of Dublin is preserved in ' Pranceriana.' * The more recent history of the Phoenix Park, considered topographically, has been quite uneventful ; and with the final acquisition by the Crown of the various residences within its boundaries this record of its origin and formation may fairly close. ' The King v. Bradshaw, Crown Office Eecords, King's Bench, Feb. 6, 1775, Exshaw^s Monthly Chroiwloger for 1775, p. 213. ^ The Freeman's Journal, Feb. 7, 1775. ' Feb. 10, 1775. * 2nd edition, i. p. 137. See also McDougall's Irish Political Characters, p. 150. THE PHOENIX PAEK 73 APPENDIX A list of the Bangers of the Phoenix Park, from the institution of the office in 1661 to its abolition in 1840. {Compiled from the Liber Muncrum Hihernicc and other Sources.) 1661. Marcus Trevor, Viscount Dungannon. 1672. Sir Henry Brouncker, afterwards 2nd Lord Brouncker. 1674. Adam Loftus, afterwards Viscount Lisburne. 1676. Edward Brabazon, afterwards 1st Earl of Meath. 1677. July 2. William Eyder. 1677. September 13. William Eyder and Edward Eichbell. 1698. Sir William Fownes, Bart., and Henry Petty, 1st Earl of Shelburne. 1704. Sir Thomas Smith, Bart. 1736. Sir John Ligonier, afterwards Viscount Ligonier. 1751. Eight Hon. Nathaniel Clements. 1761. Lord George Sackville. 1785. Sackville Hamilton. 1795. Lodge Morris. 1796. Edward Cooke. 1801. Alexander Marsden. 1806. James Trail. 1808. Sir Charles Saxton. 1812. Sir WiUiam Gregory. 1830. Sir William Gossett. 1835-40. Thomas Drummond. Ill HIS MAJESTTS REGIMENT OF GUARDS IN IRELAND 1661-1798 The addition to the strength of the British army, in the last year of Queen Victoria's reign, of a regiment of Irish Guards was hailed with acclamation at the time as an appro- priate compliment to the soldierly qualities of Irishmen, and as a graceful recognition of the valour displayed by Irish troops on the battle-fields of South Africa. But the innova- tion was also criticised, on the other hand, as a somewhat tardy recognition of the claims of Ireland to a share in the honour of furnishing those regiments which are most closely associated with the personal service of the Sovereign, and which have enjoyed for centuries a traditional precedence in the regimental roll. It is not a little curious that an episode so interesting in the history of Irish arms as the raising of the first regiment of Irish Guards should have been so completely forgotten. Yet it is a fact that what was greeted as a belated innovation was really only a revival of a corps which is coeval in antiquity with the institu- tion of the standing army, and which, under the title of ' His Majesty's Regiment of Guards in Ireland,' enjoyed a distinguished reputation for valour and military efficiency at a most interesting period of Irish history. An attempt is here made to trace the record of a regi- ment which anciently held a distinguished place at the head of the military establishment of Ireland, and to recall the history of the remarkable corps which constituted the flower of the Irish army from the Restoration to the Revolution. And the inquiry is not the less interesting because it is in this Restoration Regiment of Irish Guards that we shall find the origin of one of the most eminent of the distin- THE lEISH GUAEDS 75 guished corps which subsequently constituted the Irish Brigade abroad. It may, indeed, be doubted whether the history of any regiment displays a more varied career. For dis- banded after the Boyne, the units of the regiment took service abroad, and achieved under a succession of brilliant officers an honourable place in the military history of eighteenth- century France. And preserving in exile that fealty to the principle of hereditary right which, combined with devotion to the Roman Catholic faith, had led its officers to adhere through evil days to the fallen fortunes of James II., the remnant renewed, on the fall of Louis XVI., their allegi- ance to the sovereign of the Three Kingdoms, and were re- enrolled for a brief period in the ranks of the British army. The oblivion into which the origin of the regiment has fallen is, however, explained in great part by the circumstance that the compilers of Irish military history have given but scanty attention to the records of Irish regiments at home. For example, O'Conor's ' Military Memoirs of the Irish Nation,' useful as an account of the exploits of the Irish Brigade abroad, is absolutely silent on the military establish- ment of Ireland at the Restoration. D'Alton, again, in his ' Historical and Genealogical Illustrations of King James's Army List,' begins, as is natural, only with Tyrconnel's Vice- royalty. And though O'Callaghan, in his admirably minute and exhaustive ' History of the Irish Brigade in the service of France,' does not omit all notice of the origin of the dis- tinguished regiments whose subsequent careers he traces in so much detail, his references to their pre-Revolution story are brief and parenthetic. To this explanation of our ignorance of the earliest records of the first regiment of Irish Guards it may be added that it is only in years com- paratively recent that the materials for tracing the origin of the regiment with any semblance of completeness have become available.^ ' No investigator in this field of our seventeenth-century history can fail to acknowledge a large debt to the late Sir John Gilbert, who, by his labours as editor of the Ormonde Manuscripts and of the Records of the Corporation of Dublin, has thrown open to the students of seventeenth-century Ireland two splendid treasuries of historical, topographical, and antiquarian lore. And from both of these sources much light is to be derived concerning the Irish Guards. 76 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY The process by which the regiments raised by various Royalist officers became the parents of several of the most distinguished of existing regiments has its best known examples in the Grenadier Guards and the Coldstream Guards, and need not be delineated here. And the circum- stances which, immediately following on the Restoration, led to the institution of a standing army, and laid the foundations of the existing military system of the United Kingdom, are familiar to every student of our political and constitutional history. But it may be well to glance at the beginning of the system in Great Britain, since it was there that the model was provided for the military establishment which, on the appointment of the Duke of Ormond to the Viceroyalty, was at once instituted in Ireland. Especially is this necessary to the elucidation of the origin of the Irish Guards, because the conception of a regiment directly associated with the Crown, a regiment formed to be, in fact as well as in name, * His Majesty's Guards,' goes back to a period prior to the Restoration. Four years before his return to England, Charles II., hope- less of the renewal of even such ineffectual and half-hearted succour as had been extended to him at the beginning of his exile by the French Court, imagined that he had found in Spain the assistance necessary to regain his throne. Under the inspiration of Mazarin, Louis XIV. had become convinced of the permanence of the Cromwellian regime, and had ceased to give any serious encouragement to the English Royalists. Charles had therefore turned for aid from Paris to Madrid. In connection with a project for the invasion of England by a Spanish expedition, it was resolved to organise, for service with the Spanish forces in the Low Countries, the considerable soldiery which had accompanied their Sovereign abroad, and had earned distinction in the armies commanded by Turenne.^ Accordingly, several ' ' The Spanish army, after being near Turenne at Quesnoy for some days, has now gone to besiege the town of Cond6. Many of the Irish in the Regiment of Guards are said to be killed. Ormond's nephew Muskery, with his regiment, wasonTurenne's side.'— Peter Talbot to Ormond, from Brussels, July 24, 1656. Macray's Cal. of Clarendon State Papers, iii. p. 148. THE IRISH GUARDS 77 regiments, both British and Irish, were gathered together into a division, and placed under the Spanish commander in Flanders. The English officers, by whom Charles was more immediately sm*rounded, were formed into what was called a Eoyal Regiment of Guards under Lord Wentworth, and some regiments of Irish were organised at the same time.^ The command of the largest of these, a corps seven hundred strong, was assigned to the Marquis of Ormond ; it was quar- tered near Bruges, and ultimately took part in the unsuccess- ful operations at Dunkirk. The officers included many of the Confederate Catholic officers who had fled from Ireland.^ Wentworth's Eegiment of Guards survived the ill- success of Charles II. 's negotiations for aid from Spain. Eemaining abroad at the Restoration as part of the garrison of Dunkirk, it escaped inclusion in that general disbandment of the army of the Commonwealth, in Septem- ' Clarendon's account of the matter is as follows : ' The King resolved to raise one regiment of Guards, the command whereof he gave to the Lord Went- worth, which was to do duty in the army as common men till his Majesty should be in such a posture that they might be brought about his person. The Marquis of Ormond had a regiment in order to be commanded by his lieutenant- colonel, that the Irish might be tempted to come over.' — History of the Rebellion, XV. p. 68. 2 Sir F. Hamilton, in his History of the Grenadier Guards, mentions that Charles I., during his stay at Oxford in 1642-3, had raised a regiment which was known as ' The King's Guards,' and states that ' the Regiment of King's Guards, as well as all the rest of the Royalist troops in England, ceased to exist as regiments in 1646-7 ; and the English troops raised subsequently by Charles II., with wliich he endeavoured to recover the Crown of his ancestors, were disbanded after the battle of Worcester in 1651 ; so that though we trace among the officers of the Regiment of Guards which Charles II. raised in Flanders many Royalists who had either served in the King's Guards or in other corps during the Civil War, both in the time of Charles I. and II., there is no connection as a regiment between these two corps of Guards ' (vol. i. p. 8). It appears, however, from a letter published in the Ormonde Papers (vol. i. p. 97), that Wentworth's regiment existed in some form in 1649: — 'Thomas Wentworth to Edward Broughton. Breda, June 24, 1649. You are to receive such men as shall be delivered you on shipboard as part of a regiment to (sic) the King's Guards, and you to command them as sergeant-major to the said regiment, and at your landing in Ireland you are to obey such orders and directions as you shall receive from the Marquis of Ormond, the Lieutenant- General of the kingdom of Ireland.' It is noticeable that this letter is addressed by the subsequent colonel of Charles II.'s post-Restoration Guards to an officer who afterwards held a commission in that regiment. The letter is addressed, ' For Major Edward Broughton, Major to the King's Guard of Foot.' 78 ILLUSTKATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY ber 1660, which was among the first acts of the restored monarchy. The young Sovereign, however, whose whole conception of the kingly dignity was coloured by his familiarity with continental courts, had no intention of re- maining without a personal guard ; and at the very moment which witnessed 'the dispersion of the remnant of Cromwell's Ironsides, he entrusted Colonel John Eussell, a brother of the Duke of Bedford, with a commission to raise a regiment of Foot Guards, twelve hundred strong, under the title of the King's Royal Regiment of Guards. Lord Wentworth's earlier formed regiment remained abroad until the sale of Dunkirk, when it came to England, where it was maintained as a distinct corps during Wentworth's life. But on the death of its colonel, three years later, on the eve of the outbreak of the Dutch War, Wentworth's was merged in Colonel Russell's regiment, to which the existing regiment of Grenadier Guards proudly traces its origin.^ No one who has had occasion to consider the character of the arrangements made upon the Restoration for the machinery of the constitution and the equipment of the public service can have failed to be struck by the closeness with which the institutions of every sort set up in Great Britain were followed in the organisation of the Irish Government. The formal constitution of a standing army by Charles II., and the formation of his Majesty's Regiment of Guards, took place early in 1661. It does not appear how far, if at all, the King's advisers then contemplated the provision of a separate military establishment for Ireland. It is probable that the question remained in abeyance until after the selection of the first Restoration Viceroy, an appointment which was delayed until the autumn of that year. But when the Duke of Ormond was appointed to the Viceroyalty, he was careful to imitate in all respects, as far as possible, the model provided in England. The establishment for Ireland, both civil and military, followed closely upon the lines laid down by Clarendon and the other advisers of Charles 11. Ormond was given a free hand in Ireland, ' the places, ' Sir F. Hamilton's History of the Grenadier Guards, pp. 30-34. THE lEISH GUAEDS 79 as well in the martial as civil list, being left freely to his disposing.' He at once proceeded to exercise his authority, by providing for the civil and military needs of Ireland upon a scale of great magnificence. And as a means both of emphasising the dignity of the Viceregal office, and of supplying an efficient force for service in emergency, one of his first steps was to procure a commission to raise a regiment of Guards for service in Ireland.^ Accordingly, on April 23, 1662, a commission for this purpose was issued to the Viceroy.^ The Duke of Ormond having received his commission he lost no time in acting on the authority thus given to him. On the following day the regiment was formally ' The earliest reference to the intended regiment I have seen is in Orrery's State Letters, and is as follows : — ' As to what your Grace mentions of his Majesty's thoughts of raising a regiment of Guards to lie still at Dublin, I think it not fit on many accounts. Your Grace's words " provided they be raised and supported at least one year out of England " are very wise and necessary ; to which I will presume to add, what will there be to maintain them after that year ? And therefore I shall lay before your Grace my poor thoughts upon that thing. My Lord of Mount- rath had a regiment of horse in this his Majesty's army, which by his death is void. I think, as partial as you can be against your own family, your Grace cannot but acknowledge that it is but mere justice my Lord Ossory being general of the horse should have that regiment. Then the regiment of foot his lord- ship now has may be the King's Guards in this kingdom ; whereby your end will be answered without a penny charge in the raising it, or additional charge in the maintaining it. I hope on this regiment your Grace will pardon me, if I presume to mention Jack Stephens for an employment suitable to his fidelity and merit. I have made inquiry whether the regiment may be clothed here with red cassocks lined with green and with green buttons, and at what rates the provision of cloth and linings of this colour will be had here : Cassocks, breeches, a shirt, and one pair of stockings will cost about 38 shillings.' — Orrery to Ormond, Dec. 28, 1661. - The following is the text of this commission : — ' Whereas we have already constituted and appointed James, Duke of Ormond, to be Governor of our Kingdom of Ireland, and of all our armies there raised and to be raised : And whereas we have thought fit to raise within this our kingdom of Ireland, a regiment of 1,200 foot to be our Regiment of Guards in our said Kingdom of Ireland : We do give and grant to our said Lieutenant and Chief Governor full power, liberty and authority, by beat of drums, pro- clamations, or otherwise, to raise the said number of men in England, and to conduct, lead and transport them into Ireland, with power and authority to him to give and grant commissions under his hand and seal to such persons as he shall think fit to be officers and commanders of the said regiment.' — Carte Papers. 80 ILLUSTRATIONS OP IRISH HISTORY constituted, and provision at once made for the enrol- ment of twelve companies of one hundred men each. The Viceroy's second son, Lord Eichard Butler, who was immediately afterwards created Earl of Arran, was gazetted colonel of the regiment with the captaincy of a company ; and eleven other officers were appointed to the remaining companies.^ The establishment of the regiment was calcu- lated on a generous scale, no less a sum than 24,518Z. 8s, Sd. per annum being allocated to its maintenance. Its roll included, in addition to the colonel, a lieutenant-colonel, a major and nine captains of companies, twelve lieutenants, twelve ensigns, forty sergeants, thirty-six corporals, a drum-major with tv^enty-four drummers, a piper to the King's company, and twelve hundred soldiers. In addition to the fighting strength of the regiment, there were attached a chaplain, an adjutant quartermaster, a surgeon, and a surgeon's mate.^ It does not appear from any document from what district the rank and file of the regiment was recruited ; but it is evident that at the date of the commission to Ormond con- siderable progress had been already made in finding the men and arranging for their equipment, and the original list of officers included some who had served in the regiment commanded by Ormond in Flanders. On April 14, 1662, the Vice-Treasurer received orders to pay to Lieutenant- Colonel Sir William Flower, the sum of 1,8911. 8s. 8d., ' towards the raising, sending to the sea-side, and transporting into Ireland of the officers and soldiers of the said regiment.' ^ Two days later a similar sum, ' being one month's pay of the Eegiment of Guards for Ireland,' was ordered to be paid to the same officer. On April 21 orders were given for 66'Bl. 14s. to be paid to John Wall, ' for 600 scarlet coats, bought of him for his Majesty's Eegiment of Guards for Ireland, and 755?. 12s. to be paid to Henry Prescott for 661 red coats, and embroidering twenty-four drummers' coats, ' Ormonde Papers, i. p. 239. - Sir William Petty's Political Anatomy of Ireland. * Carte Papers, clxv. p. 3. THE lEISH GUARDS 81 with sacks to pack them up in.' ' This uniform is identical with that prescribed for Colonel Kussell's Eegiment of Guards in England. A little later Alderman Daniel Bellingham, afterwards the first Lord Mayor of Dublin, received an order to furnish all the non-commissioned officers and men with a red ' cassock,' a term not as yet appropriated by the clergy, together with ' cloth breeches, two shirts, one pair of stock- ings, and one pair of shoes.' The cassock was lined with green. ^ No time was lost in transferring the newly raised regi- ment to its destination. As early as May, the news-letters of the day chronicled the embarkation of the Guards for Ireland.^ ' On the 9th instant,' according to the Chester correspondent of ' Mercurius Publicus,' ' Sir William Flower, who had the conduct of his Majesty's Eegiment of Guards for Ireland, under the command of the Earl of Arran, arrived here with that regiment, in order to their transporta- tion for Ireland,' and on May 14 it was reported that ' Sir William commenced to ship twelve companies in eleven ships at Neston.' We are further informed that ' during the march from London with this regiment, Sir William himself constantly marched with the men. Sir William Flower, my Lord Callan, and other chief officers in the regiment were entertained by the Mayor at Chester.' They reached Dublin safely before the end of May ; and on the 28th of that month, the same journal announced that ' the King's Regiment of Foot, under the command of the Earl of Arran, consisting of twelve companies, that came this week from England, marched this day, completely armed and clothed, through the city, and are all quartered in and about it for the Guards.' The conception of the regiment being that of a body- guard for the person of the Lord-Lieutenant as the representative of the King, it was not contemplated that the corps should serve, in time of peace at least, outside the ' See Sir F. Hamilton's Historij of the Grenadier Guards. ^ Orrery's State Letters, p. 58, and see the letter of Orrery already given. ' Mercwius Publicus, May y and 28, 16(i2. See also M'Kinnon's History of tJie Coldstream Guards, i. p. 109, note. G 82 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY capital. Accordingly arrangements were at once made for quartering the soldiers in Dublin, and for this purpose communications passed between the Government and the City Corporation. Between the Court and the City the liveliest accord existed throughout Ormond's Viceroyaltj', the Duke having, as one of his first acts, secured a payment of 5001. a year from the exchequer to the Mayor, in consideration of the loyalty of the city in the years following the Rebellion of 1641, and of the civic poverty resulting from the civil wars, and having exerted himself to the utmost at the Restoration for the protection and enlargement of the liberties of Dublin. And it was to Ormond's intervention that the dignity of Lord Mayor, shortly afterwards conferred on the head of the Corporation, as well as the royal gift of a collar of SS. and cap of maintenance, and other marks of royal favour, were directly due.^ The City Assembly was therefore prepared to comply with a loyal alacrity with the direction of the Viceroy to provide quarters for the Guards. On May 28 the Lords Justices and the Council, by direction from the Lord- Lieutenant, ordered the sheriffs of Dublin and seneschals of the Liberties ' to provide lodging for the officers and soldiers of his Majesty's Regiment of Guards lately arrived out of England, in inns, wine-taverns, ale-houses, or victualling houses.' - The officers were likewise quartered on the city. On June 14 Ormond wrote to the Mayor and sheriffs requiring them ' forthwith to appoint convenient quarters as near the Castle of Dublin as may be for our son Richard, Earl of Arran, Colonel of his Majesty's Regiment of Guards, and his servants ' ; ^ and shortly afterwards pro- vision was made by the city, pursuant to his Excellency's warrant, for the quartering of the commissioned officers of the King's Regiment in the city and suburbs. Thence- forward and down to the Revolution, Dublin appears to have ^ Speech of Sir W. Davys, the Becorder, Calendar of Dublin Records, iv. p. 679, and see vol. i. p. 42. - Carte Papers, Bodleian Library, xxxvii. p. 226. ^ Calendar of Dublin Records, iv. p. 273. THE IRISH GUARDS 83 continnously remained the headquarters of the Guards ; and although the arrangements for their lodging appear to have involved some burthen on the city, the best relations seem, in general, to have been maintained between the citizens and the soldiery. The troops seem to have been quartered partly in the Castle, partly through the city, especially at the city gate-houses, which, at that time, were still utilised for residential purposes. This appears from the complaint of one John Eastwood, who had contracted to pay 41. per annum to the city for St. Nicholas Gate, but represented that ' the said gate was taken up from him by the soldiers, by special orders from the Lord-Lieutenant, to his very great damage.' ^ The provision of fire and candlelight for the Guards was also constituted a charge upon the city, and assessments were annually made for this purpose on a warrant from the Viceroy, this being, in the language of a resolution of 1665, ' required to be done by act of State and a business of public concernment to this city.' - The amount of the assessment for this purpose was usually from 1501. to 2001. a year. The tax appears to have, in general, been readily contributed, though in June 1667 one John Quelch, a freeman of the city and member of the Corporation, refused ' in violation of his oath as freeman to pay his portion of the charge amount- ing to half-a-crown ' on the ground that such a levy was unlawful and unwarrantable.^ In addition to the occasional restiveness excited by the tax for their maintenance, the Guards appear to have pro- voked some unpopularity by their demeanour towards the citizens. In August 1667 a petition was presented to the Lord-Lieutenant by the City Council ' for a redress against the several oppressions of the officers and soldiers on the inhabitants of the city under the pretence of quartering.' This, however, was resented by the Colonel, Lord Arran, and the officers of the regiment, who, in a counter-petition, demanded an inquiry into the matters complained of, averring their indignation at aspersions which they stigmatised as ' a ' Calendar of Dublin Records, iv. p. 299. 2 Ibid. p. 347. ■' Ibid. p. 435. g2 84 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY high reflection on the officers and soldiers of the said Guards either in committing or suffering such oppressions to be committed by those under their command.' ^ But in general the relations between soldiery and civilians were harmonious, and Dublin was proud of the regiment. In 1666 - * his Grace the Duke of Ormond, taking notice of the many buildings lately made on Oxmantown Green, which have taken up so much room there that his Majesty's Horse and Foot Guards and the City Militia have not conveniency to exercise as formerly,' and ' recommending the city to take present orders that the grounds upon St. Stephen's Green, lately walled in, be forthwith made fit for that purpose,' the City Assembly cheerfully ordered that the ground should be levelled and made smooth with that object. This was accordingly done, and thenceforth St. Stephen's Green became the parade- ground of the Guards. A review of the regiment on this ground twenty years later is described in Clarendon's ' State Letters.' ^ A further memorial of the connection of the Irish Guards with Dublin is supplied in the records of two Dublin parishes. The regiment appears to have attended Divine Service regularly every Friday, sometimes in St. Michael's and some- times in St. Audoen's, and in 1671 Lord Arran contributed a sum of 150Z. towards the re-building of the latter church. In requital of his liberality it was ordered ' that the arms and supporters of the said Earl of Arran be fairly presented and erected in the said church ' ; ■* and further, that every commissioned officer of the Koyal regiment, from the said Earl to the ensign, should henceforth enjoy all privileges and indemnities of parishioners in regard to marriages, christenings, and burials. The parish of St. Michael was less fortunate when two years later it solicited a like con- tribution, notwithstanding that it was averred that ' for several years past the several companies of the Eoyal regi- ment quartered in this city have made use of the Church of ' Calendar of Dublin Records, iv. p. 423. - Ibid. p. 383. ^ Clarendon's State Letters, i. p. 434. * Gilbert's History of Dublin, i. p. 281. THE lEISH GUAKDS 85 St. Michael, but in all that time nothing hath been contri- buted towards the reparation of the said church or the seats thereof.' Mention has just been made of the City Militia, and some confusion might easily occur between the two bodies, which in the Assembly rolls are sometimes referred to indifferently as the Guards of the city. The two forces were, however, entirely distinct, and had no relation to each other, save in so far as each was in its degree responsible for the defence of the city. A militia, 24,000 strong, was raised to supplement the regular army ; and in 1660 two foot regiments of city militia had been formed, one for service within, the other without the city ; the Mayor for the time being acting as Commander-in-Chief. The Mayor was likewise designated commander of a foot company through the good offices of Sir Theophilus Jones, the Scout- master-General of the army, a distinction which was so much appreciated by the city dignitary that the City Assembly voted a sum of 501. for a piece of plate to be pre- sented to Lady Jones in recognition of her husband's exertions.^ Some friction seems occasionally to have been provoked between the City Guards and the King's regiment. The author of ' Ireland's Sad Lamentation ' '•* imputes to the latter a slackness little creditable to the gallantry of the corps, alleging that the militia would not be suffered to guard within the city, the King's Guard being ap- pointed to defend the same, and were obliged to serve outside the walls, ' so that upon any attempt, our volunteer inhabitants might certainly have perished before the King's soldiery who received pay had entered into any dangerous engagement.' But this innuendo, with the rest of the publication in which it appeared, was declared by the City Assembly to be ' a black and ugly libel.' Another force not to be confounded with his Majesty's Eegiment of Guards was the Lord-Lieutenant's Guard of Halbertiers or Battle-axes, which, during the reign of ' Calendar of Dublin Becords, iv. p. 221. - ' Ireland's Sad Lamentation,' 1681. Ibid. v. Preface, 86 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY Charles II., from the opening of Ormond's Viceroyalty^ in 1661 down to 1665, was maintained as part of the Military Establishment. This body, which was known sometimes as the Company of Battle-axes, sometimes as the Guard of Halbertiers, consisted of a captain, lieutenant, two sergeants, and sixty men, dressed in buff coats, and was modelled on the Yeomen of the Guard. ^ The provision made at the Restoration for such a retinue to attend the Viceroy was in accordance with the ancient traditions of the Viceregal office, for as early as the reign of Henry VIII., when the Earl of Surrey came over as Deputy, one hundred Yeomen of the Guard were sent to Ireland with him to serve as his body-guard.^ It would appear that, at this time, in their uniform and accoutrements this Guard closely followed its English prototype. On April 2, 1662, Colonel, after- wards Sir Daniel, Treswell, who was appointed to the command of the Battle-axes, received from Ormond a warrant for 275Z. 4s. towards buying ' 64 buff coats and 64 belts at 41. 6s. for each coat and belt for our guard of foot.'* The force having been equipped in England came to Ireland in that year, and ' for the more convenient perform- ance of their duty ' ^' were ordered to be quartered as near to Dublin Castle as possible. Treswell, their commander, who had come to Ireland in 1641 in command of a troop of horse, had ' faithfully served his Majesty in honourable em- ployment during the whole war in England and Ireland,' ' Ormonde Papers, i. p. 40G. - Sir W. Petty's Political Anatomy of Ireland. ^ Preston's Yeomen of tJie Guard, p. 100. See also Sir John Davies' Discovery : ' In the time of Henry VIII. the Earl of Surrey, Lord Admiral, was made Lieutenant ; and though he were the greatest captain of the English nation then living, yet brought he with him rather an honourable guard for his person than a competent army to recover Ireland. For he had in his retinue two hundred tall yeomen of the King's Guard.' * Carte Papers. The uniform must, however, have been materially altered in the course of the next century if a plate in Walker's Hibernian Magazine for Nov. 1787 may be depended on. In this drawing the ' Battle-axes ' are depicted as guarding the remains of the Viceroy, the Duke of Rutland, at his lying in State in the Irish House of Lords. =• Order for quartering the Battle-axes, Dec. 8, 1662, Ormonde MSS. ; Calen- dar of Dublin Records, iv. p. -545. The guard at this time was sixty strong. THE lEISH GUAEDS 87 in the course of which he had commanded the Lord- Lieutenant's regiment of horse. Ormond, loyal in pro- sperity to his friends in adversity, not only rewarded his fidelity with the command of his Battle-axes/ but procured him, in 1665, the honour of a baronetcy, and recommended him in the same year to the burgesses of Downpatrick, by whom he was returned to Parliament." In addition to the City Guard the Lord Mayor, in emula- tion of the Lord-Lieutenant, seems also to have instituted a small body-guard of halbertiers ; but it is not surprising to learn that this force, six in number, was ' not found so useful as it was expected,' or that it was in consequence ordered that as many of them as the Lord Mayor and Sheriffs should think fit to be officers at mace should be so appointed, and discharged from their place of bearing halberts. That his Majesty's Kegiment of Guards was from the first intended to hold the highest place in the regimental roll in Ireland there can be no manner of doubt. When, during the Viceroyalty of Lord Clarendon, at the opening of the reign of James II., several of the officers of the Guards were displaced by Tyrconnel in pursuance of his programme to new-model the Irish army on a Roman Catholic basis, Major Billingsley, one of the displaced officers, in protesting against his removal, averred that 'to be a Major of the Royal Regiment of Guards is better and more honourable than to be Lieutenant-Colonel of any other regiment.' The prestige of the regiment derived eclat at the outset from the fact that the commission for the raising of the regiment was given to the Viceroy. The Duke of Ormond was not alone the King's representative and the General-in-Chief of the army in Ireland, but was the first of his Irish subjects in rank, fame, and fortune. He had held the post of Lieutenant-General or Commander-in-Chief of the army formed by Strafford as ' Ormonde Papers, vols. i. and ii. The following inscription appears upon a tomb in the chancel of the old church at Finglas, near Dublin : — ' Heere under lyeth the body of Sir Daniel Treswell knight and baronett who faithfully served his Majesty in honourable employment during the whole war in England and Ireland and dyed the 24th day of May, 1670.' 88 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY far back as 1640 ; and his association with the regiment would have been sufficient of itself to stamp the corps with peculiar distinction. Ormond was careful to secure that its honour should undergo no diminution in the persons of its officers, who were selected largely from the ranks of the Irish nobility, and included several who had followed his fortunes through the whole course of the civil war and foreign exile. Unable himself, with the multifarious duties of the Vice- royalty, to assume the direct command, Ormond asserted in the most marked way his personal interest in the fortunes of the regiment by nominating to the colonelcy, as already stated, his second son Eichard, Earl of Arran, a nobleman who, if less distinguished than his gallant brother. Lord. Ossory, was yet a man of considerable ability, who on more than one occasion during Ormond's absence in England filled the office of Lord Deputy. Arran gave proofs of considerable military capacity in command of his regiment, first in sup- pressing a formidable mutiny of the soldiers of other regi- ments at Carrickfergus in 1666, and later, in 1673, by his distinguished conduct under the Duke of York, in the sea- fight with the Dutch in that year, in which, after the manner of those days, the Guards took a part, serving on board ship.' For his services on this occasion, Arran was rewarded with an English peerage. ' No man,' says Carte, ' was more active, more eager, and more intrepid in danger.' During his tenure of the office of Deputy in 1684, he exhibited great personal gallantry in dealing with a very serious fire in Dublin Castle, by which a great part of the Castle buildings was destroyed.^ An address of congratulation was presented on this occasion by the citizens of Dublin, in which Arran's energy is eulogised in glowing terms : ' By your Excel- lency's presence of mind, care, and conduct, in the midst of the devouring flames which encompassed j^ou, not only the remaining part of the buildings of the Castle, but the great magazine of powder to which the fire had within a few steps ' Carte's Orvwnde, ii. p. r)44. ■■' Calendar of Dublin Records, v. p. 312, and see p. 24 S7(p-a. THE lEISH GUARDS 89 approached, was wonderfully preserved, and the ancient records of this Kingdom, then also in the Castle, rescued from those flames.' On Lord Arran's premature death, early in 1686, shortly after his father had been recalled from the Irish Government by James II., the direct association of the Ormond family with the Guards was maintained by the bestowal of the command of the regiment on Lord Ossory, son of the distinguished soldier-statesman of that name, and afterwards second Duke of Ormond : a selection which, as the new Viceroy, Clarendon, reported to Sunderland, gave as lively a satisfaction in Ireland as could be imagined.^ At the time of his original appointment. Lord Arran was too junior to have acquired the military knowledge necessary to the commander of the regiment in the field ; and for the lieutenant-colonelcy Ormond selected, as we have seen, Sir William Flower, an officer who was well qualified by his experience to undertake the effective control of the newly enrolled corps.- Flower, whose father had come to Ireland towards the close of Queen Elizabeth's reign, and had served in James I.'s time as Governor of Waterford, had been one of Ormond's officers in the troubled years that followed the rebellion. As early as 1641 he had held a captain's commission in Ormond's own regiment of foot, which had its quarters in Christchurch Yard, and had formed part of the garrison of Dublin down to 1648 ; and he had risen to its command. He had suffered imprisonment at the hands of the Parliamentary party on Ormond's departure from Ireland in 1648. At the Eestoration he was at once raised to eminence by his old patron, becoming a member of the Privy Council, with a seat in the Irish Parliament as member for St. Canice, and being appointed one of the trustees for satisfying the arrears of the '49 officers. He re- ceived considerable grants of land ; and his son extending the family influence by a matrimonial alliance with the daughter of Sir John Temple, the family became important enough to win, in the person of Sir William Flower's ' Clarendon's State Letters, i. p. 229. * Archdall's Lodge's Peerage, v. p. 233. 90 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY grandson, the peerage of Castle Durrow, a rank which, in the generation following, was merged in the still existing dignity of the Viscounty of Ashbrook.^ The other officers appointed to the command of companies at the institution of the regiment were likewise persons of distinction. The King's company was given to Sir Nicholas Armorer, who had acted as equerry to the King in exile, and was a close friend of the Duke of Ormond, by whose influence he was returned to Parliament as member for the county Wicklow, and appointed Governor of Cork.^ Sir John Stephens, who, like Sir William Flower, had held a com- mission in Ormond's old regiment as far back as 1643, and who, after the Eestoration, represented Fethard in the Irish Parhament — he had married a sister of Flower's, and held the office of Constable of Dublin Castle — was appointed major ; and the other officers included Lord Callan, after- wards the third Earl of Denbigh, Lord John Butler — Ormond's youngest son, and Colonel Francis Willoughby, well known in the ten years' warfare in Ireland, from 1641 to 1651. It is thus evident that the note of pre-eminence and distinction which has ever been associated with the Guards in England was characteristic of the Irish regiment from the date of its institution. A corps, whose sphere of service was restricted in time of peace to the capital, and which even in war was likely to be actively employed only in circumstances of emer- ' There is some reason to suspect that during the ecHpse of the Koyalist fortunes Flower, like not a few of Ormond's Irish adherents, was among those who conformed to the government of Commonwealth, and that he held a com- mand in Fleetwood's Regiment. See the Leyburne-Popham Papers, Hist. MSS. Commissioners' Report, p. 153. The following inscription still remains on a tablet in Finglas Church, co. Dublin : — ' Gulielmi Flower, equitis aurati, qui tribunus militum sub Carolo Primo partes Regis et fortunas labantes fide illibata, infracta virtute, ad ultimum propugnavit. Restaurata regia familia Ormonius cor'ptorum ejus testis, nee immemor illi, si non quod meruit, quod tamen ipse cupivit virtutis prtemium Pratorianorum militum pro-pra;fectus dedit ut fidei etiam spectatissimse uberioresset honos, eum in sanetioris concilii album ascrip- sit et copiarum in Ultoniam prideni missarum cum a factione Monumethensi pericula in Scotia gliscerunt, sub Granardi'P comite prajfectum fecit. !Mortem obiit 10 die Junii a.d. 1681.' See Journal of R.S.A.L 1897, p. 454. - Cholmondeley Papers, Hist. MSS. Com. 5th Rep. THE lEISH GUAEDS 91 gency, was naturally deprived for some years of many oppor- tunities of distinguishing itself, and it is not very easy to trace the record of the regiment in the first few years of its existence. Its earliest active service appears to have been in suppressing the mutiny at Carrickfergus in 1666, already noted,^ but down to 1673 such mention of it as we find is chiefly in connection with ceremonial display. On the occasion of the Duke of Ormond's State entry into Dublin, in 1665, a pageant of unusual magnificence, the regiment formed the guard of honour from St. James's Gate to the Castle, the King's company being in close attendance on the Viceroy, and following immediately the Guard of Battle- axes. In 1672 they were ordered for service with the fleet on the outbreak of the Dutch War, and two companies, of which Lord Arran's was one, were sent to Chester, and appear to have taken part in the action in Solebay.^ The military annals of the Eestoration still remain very scrappy and imperfect. Even the achievements of the British Guards have been insufficiently recorded. Little or nothing is known of the career of the Irish Guards from 1675 to 1685, when, as already mentioned, the colonelcy passed to the young Lord Ossory on the death of his uncle Lord Arran, although very full lists of its officers for several years of this obscure decade are still extant. The changes in the regiment within this period do not seem to have been many ; the most important being the appointment of Sir Charles Feilding — a member of the ancient family of which the Earl of Denbigh is the head — to be lieutenant-colonel ' ' 1666, about the beginning of May, tlie garrison, consisting of about 200 men, mutinied for want of their pay, and, choosing Corporal Dillon for their commander, seized the town and castle. On the 25th of the same month, the Earl of Arran, son to the Duke of Ormond, arrived by sea in the Dartmouth frigate, with four companies of Guards, and he assaulting the town by sea, and Sir William Flower by land, the mutineers were forced to retreat into the castle, with the loss of Dillon their commander, and two others. The Earl also lost two soldiers. Next day the Duke of Ormond arrived from Dublin with the Horse Guards, and the mutineers surrendered at discretion. The Corporation (of Carrickfergus) received thanks from the Government for their loyalty on this occasion, and gave a splendid entertainment to the Earl of Arran.' — McSkimin's History of CarricJcfergns, pp. 18, 19. ■^ Sir F. Hamilton's History of the Grenadier Guards, i. p. 163. 92 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY on the death, in 1681, of Sir WiUiam Flower. The Guards appear, however, to have been maintained in vigorous efficiency. On April 23, 1685, Major Billingsley reported to his colonel, that he ' drew out the regiment to solemnise the coronation, which was performed after the usual way on State days.'' Lord Clarendon, who superseded Ormond in the Irish Government in 1685, reported very favourably of their appearance in a letter to James II. : — ' The other day,' he wrote, ' I saw your Majesty's Regiment of Guards drawn out ; and though I am no soldier, yet I may assure your Majesty they exercise and perform all their duty as well as your Guards in England can do. If they had the honour to be in your presence you would have no cause to be ashamed of them.'^ But the regiment was now about to become involved in those far-reaching changes which shortly after the accession of James II. became so universal in every department of the public service, and were ere long to lead to such startling results. The King resolved on a drastic reform of the personnel of the army, and Tyrconnel came to Ireland to superintend and carry out the changes which had been resolved upon. This is not the occasion on which to discuss the policy of James II. in dealing with his Irish forces prior to the events which obliged him to rely upon their services in his unsuccessful effort to retain his Crown. It must suffice here to observe that, under Tyrconnel's direction, a sweeping reform was rapidly and even violently carried out. The process may be traced in the correspondence of Lord Clarendon, who, though unquestionably loyal to his Sove- reign, was alarmed at the vehemence of the subordinate who was so shortly to be his successor. Clarendon's letters written during the period of his Viceroyalty shed a flood of clear light on events in Ireland in the years immediately preceding the Revolution. Though of liberal opinions on the Roman Catholic question, he was, despite his close family connection with King James, far from endorsing every item in the policy of his royal master, ' Ormonde MSS. - Clarendon's State Letters, i. p. 231. THE lEISH GUAEDS 93 disliking the rapidity and violence with which changes were introduced into the system of government he was adminis- tering, and particularly resenting the interference of Tyr- connel, who, as Lieutenant-General of the army in Ireland, exercised plenary powers independently of the Viceroy. His correspondence relating to Tyrconnel's proceedings contains several references to the Guards.' In letter after letter he represented to James and to his ministers his disapproval of proceedings which, apart from their unfortunate effect in ahenating a large section of the Irish population, he con- sidered injurious to the efficiency of the army in Ireland, and especially to the Regiment of Guards. Pursuant, however, to the commands of the King, who, as he told Clarendon, was ' resolved to employ his subjects of the Roman Catholic religion,' and ' not to keep one man in his service who ever served under the usurpers,' ^ Tyrconnel proceeded to put out of the regiment such of the officers as were unlikely to lend themselves to the new order of things, and at the same time to make large changes in the personnel of the rank and file. The true reasons for these alterations were not of course publicly avowed, the ostensible ground being that, in the language of Tyrconnel, ' the Scotch battalion, which is newly come into England, has undone us ; the King is so pleased with it that he will have all his forces in the same posture. We have here a great many old men, and of different statures : ^ they must be all turned out, for the King would have all his men young and of one size.' This, however, was only a pretext, for, according to Clarendon, the new men were ' full as little ' as those who were turned out. On June 8 the Guards were reviewed in St. Stephen's Green by Tyrconnel, who owned to Clarendon that ' it was a much better regiment than he could have imagined, and that the men did their exercises as well as any regi- ment in England ' ; ' but this did not prevent Tyrconnel from proceeding with his reforms. The new officers were ' Clarendon's State Letters, i. p. 433, ct seq. - Ibid. i. p. 431. 3 Ibid. i. p. 468. ' Ibid. i. p. 440. 94 ILLUSTEATIONS OP lEISH HISTOEY commissioned and presented to the regiment on parade. Sir Charles Feilding, who had served with the regiment from its formation, and risen from ensign to be lieutenant-colonel, was superseded in his command — the King, as Tyrconnel put it, ' being so well satisfied in the long services of Sir Charles Feilding that he had removed him to prefer him to a better post.' ^ Sir William Dorrington, a native of England and the youngest major in the army, whose subsequent career evinced considerable military ability, but who was a com- plete stranger to his new command, was appointed in his place. ^ Other old officers of long standing in the regiment, such as Major Billingsley and Captain Margetson,^ a son of the Irish Primate, were likewise superseded. The changes among the officers were followed by the dismissal of five hundred men, two-thirds of whom, according to Clarendon, were * able and lusty men,' and a credit to the regiment. The hardship of their dismissal was aggravated by the fact that they had just bought fresh uniforms by direction of their colonel, and were not reimbursed for their expenditure. To fill the places of these men, Dorrington was ordered to recruit in such counties as he thought fit ; and accordingly despatched Arthur, one of his captains, to Connaught to raise men for the Guards — a proceeding much resented by Clarendon, who forbade Dorrington to proceed in it.^ So violent an exercise of authority inevitably excited alarm. ' All men,' wrote Clarendon, ' who have any conside- ration and care of the King's service are extremely troubled at the method which is taken of doing things. To turn out, in one day, 400 men of the Eegiment of Guards, 300 of whom have no visible fault, and many of them cheerfully went the last year first into the North and afterwards into England, does put apprehensions into men's heads which they would otherwise have no cause for, and putting in none ' Clarendon's State Letters, i. p. 134. - Ibid. ii. p. 45. There is no sufficient authority for D'Alton's statement, followed by O'Callaghan, that Dorrington was connected with the regiment from its formation. His name does not appear in any of the early lists of officers, which are printed in full in the Orinonde Papers, vols. i. and ii. '■' Ibid. i. p. 435. * Ibid. i. p. 578. THE lEISH GUAEDS 95 but natives in their rooms, who really to the eye, as to stature and ability, make worse figures than those that are put out, confirms their jealous apprehensions,' ^ But though the composition of the corps was largely altered, and the principal positions confided to officers of Tyrconnel's way of thinking, there does not appear to have been any general surrender of commissions by the old officers who escaped immediate dismissal. These appear to have remained in the regiment down to the arrival of William III. in England. From the sweeping changes inaugurated by Tyrconnel it resulted that the regiment took part with James II. in his struggle for the Crown of the Three Kingdoms, though in numbers considerably short of its proper strength. And this notwithstanding that the colonel. Lord Ossory, who, in 1688, succeeded to the dukedom of Ormond, and had been left undisturbed in his nominal command, went over to William III. as soon as he landed at Torbay. The colonelcy was given by James to Dorrington, under whose command the Guards took part in the siege of Derry, and subsequently fought at the Boyne and Aughrim. In the latter battle Dorrington was taken prisoner, and Barker, who had been appointed lieutenant-colonel, was killed ; and it does not appear under what officers the last services of the Irish Guards on Irish soil were rendered at the defence of Lime- rick. After the capitulation of that city the Eoyal Regi- ment of Guards was the foremost of those which made choice of the cause of King James and exile. In that dramatic scene, so powerfully painted for us by Macaulay, when the garrison of Limerick was ordered to pass in review before the rival commanders, Ginkell and Sarsfield, and those who wished to remain in the Ireland of King William were directed to file off at a particular spot, all but seven of the Guards, marching fourteen hundred strong, went beyond the fatal point and embraced the alternative of exile. Not all of these, however, adhered to their resolution, and only five hundred appear to have been included in the thousands, who, in the language of the historian, ' departed to learn in ' Clarendon's State Papers, i. p. 485, July 6. 96 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY foreign camps that discipline without which natural courage is of small avail, and to retrieve, on distant fields of battle, the honour which had been lost by a long series of defeats at home.' ^ Eeference has been made above to the fact that the career of the Irish Guards was not closed with the defeat of the cause with which their last years in Ireland were identi- fied. After 1690, indeed, they disappeared from the roll of the regiments in the service of the British Crown, and it is hardly surprising that William III. made no attempt to revive a corps which had fought for his opponent. But though exiled to France for above one hundred years, the identity of the regiment was never completely lost. It still continued to be recruited abroad from the ' wild geese ' who flocked in a continuous stream from Ireland to the Continent through the course of the eighteenth century. Under the leadership of Dorrington it served with distinction at Loudon and Charleroy, and though broken up in 1698, after the Peace of Ryswick, when it ceased to retain its old title, it was substantially re-embodied under its old chief, and was known until his death, in 1718, as the Dorrington Regiment. The regiment continued during this period, by desire of King James II., to retain the unifonn and colours it had worn in the British Service.^ Thenceforward it was dis- ' Macaulay's History of England, chap. xvii. - See on this point, Historigiie clu 57" Regiment d'Infanterie de Ligne, i690-iS92. Par Capitaine Malaguti. Paris, 1892. From this work the following extracts are taken : — ' II semble que, des cette epoque (1698), les regiments irlandais et suisses ^taient distingu^s par I'habit rouge-garance ; tandis que toute I'infanterie fran(?aise portait I'habit gris-blanc,' p. 16. ' Notes siir Vuniformc diL Bi^giment de Dillon de 1690 a 1191. — Nous n'avons pu trouver aucun renseignement sur I'uniforme de Dillon pendant les quarante premieres annees de son s^jour en France. Le premier ouvrage qui nous ait fourni une donnee precise est la Carte abregee du militaire de la France (de Leman de la Jaise) qui, pour les annees 1730 et 1733, attribue a Dillon : habit rouge et parements bleus,' p. 75. The ' habit rouge-garance ' was worn con- tinuously down to 1791 by all the Irish regiments in the French service. The facings varied in colour, and in the case of the Irish Guards were of St. Patrick's blue. A representation of the nniforms of the French army in 1772 shows the Guards or Roscommon Regiment, as it was then called, to have worn a red coat or tunic with blue facings, buff breeches, white Hessian boots, and a THE lEISH GUAEDS 97 tinguished by the names of its successive colonels, Counts Michael de Eoth and Edward de Both, Kobert Dillon, Lord Eoscommon, and Count Antoine Walsh de Serrant, all of them representatives of old Irish families, and all of them soldiers of capacity. In the Marlborough wars the regiment served with the army of Flanders, and was present at Malplaquet under Count Michael de Eoth ; it served with the Duke of Berwick in Spain, and during the colonelcy of his son took part in the battles of Dettingen and Fontenoy. Finally under Count Walsh de Serrant the regiment main- tained its old traditions down to the Bevolution, when it merged in the 92nd Begiment of the Army of France. But its officers were still, for the most part. Irishmen, and on the fall of the Bourbons it was natural that the representatives of a traditional loyalty to hereditary right should prefer the Fleur-de-lys to the Tricolour. The successors of those who had refused to concur in the English Bevolution were too proud of their consistent loyalty to be content to accept the French one. Almost without exception its officers followed their colonel, Count Walsh, in his refusal to serve under the banner of the Bepublic, and were among those who, in 1794, accepted with alacrity the invitation conveyed to the colonels of the three surviving regiments of Dillon, Berwick, and Walsh by the Duke of Portland, to take service under the British Crown under the title of the Irish Brigade.^ It was intended that the regiment should be placed upon the Irish Establishment, and recruited exclusively in Ireland for service abroad ; and its officers came over to raise a fresh corps in Ireland. But the times were out of joint for such an enterprise. The emigrant officers found Ireland in a turmoil of agitation, which had much more in common with the France of the Bevolution than with that of the ancien regime, and their efforts were almost entirely unsuccessful. The Eebellion of 1798, quickly following, put a final end to whatever hopes might have previously been entertained, by plumed helmet. The colours of the regiment at this time showed a white cross on a ground of St. Patrick's blue. ' See p. 99 infra. H 98 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY filling the English Government with misgivings as to the use to which an Irish Catholic Brigade might possibly be turned in spite of the unquestioned loyalty of its leaders. Eecruits being forthcoming in quite insufficient numbers, it was found necessary to amalgamate the regiments forming the brigade, with the result that no place remained for many of the returned officers. Weak and insufficient in numbers, the corps was sent to North America and the West Indies, but it was found impossible to maintain the brigade as an independent organisation, and within a few years it ceased to exist. This last chapter in the history of the regiment is a sad one. Making every allowance for the exacerbation of feeling at the time, the treatment accorded to the returned officers was little creditable to Irishmen of any shade of opinion ; whilst the conduct of the War Office in regard to their pay and allowances was equally deserving of disapproval. Wolfe Tone, in his Journal for 1796, describes how the officers, intending to go to Mass on Christmas Day in full uniform, were obliged to give up the idea for fear of being hustled by the populace of Dublin. On the other hand, the Duke of FitzJames, the descendant of the great soldier Berwick, and the principal personage among those to whom the invitation to join the British army had been addressed, was insulted by some observations from Lord Blaney in the Irish House of Lords, and fought a duel with that nobleman in the Phoenix Park in assertion of the honour of his confreres} The un- employed officers were treated with so little consideration by the military authorities that some of them were reduced to a half -starving condition, and had to wait several years for arrears of pay ; while the colonels, on the final disbandment of the brigade, were refused the rank as half-pay officers for which they had stipulated when entering the British Service. Thus the closing chapter in a story that had extended over a space of above one hundred and thirty years was one of misfortune, and even humiliation. But none the less the record of the Irish Guards, from their formation in 1662 to ' Annual Begister, 1797. THE IRISH GUARDS 99 the final dispersal of the last remnant of the regiment, is one in every respect creditable to the martial traditions of Ireland. Eooted in the history of its country, whether as Jacobite or Williamite, as loyalist or rebel, as fighting for or against the Crown to which it owed its origin, the career of this distinguished corps was one in which were exhibited at every stage the stainless honour of Irish gentlemen, and the indomitable valour of the Irish race. APPENDIX Mr. Lecky, in his ' History of England in the Eighteenth Century,' vol. vii. p. 254, has given some account of that final chapter in the history of the Irish Brigade, to which O'Callaghan in his otherwise exhaustive narrative pays but scant attention. Reference is also made to the episode in Mrs. M. A. O'Connell's ' Last Colonel of the Irish Brigade.' But much the fullest authority for the later history of the Irish Guards is to be found in a volume entitled : ' Une Pamille Royaliste, Irlandaise et Fran9aise, et Le Prince Charles-Edouard 1689-1799,' privately printed at Nantes in 1901 by the Due de la Tr6moille.' In this work several documents relating to the regiment under the colonelcy of Antoine Count Walsh de Serrant are reproduced. From it are extracted the documents following, viz. : the letter of the Duke of Portland above referred to, and the Commission of George III. to the Comte de Serrant as a colonel of Infantry in the Irish Brigade ^ : — Letter of the Duke of Portland to Count Walsh de Serrant.^ A Whitehall, ce 30 Sept. 1794. Monsieur, — Le Roi desirant remplir les intentions de la legislature d'Irlande, et de donner a ses sujets catholiques de ce royaume un prompte temoignage de son affection et de sa con- fiance, s'est determine k retablir le corps connu cy-devant sous le nom de la brigade irlandoise, et comme vous etiez colonel d'un des regiments dont elle etoit composee, Sa Majeste m'a donne ' A translation of this work by Miss A. G. Murray MacGregor has recently been published in Edinburgh. For further information as to Count Walsh de Serrant, and incidentally of his i-egiment, see the sumptuous work by the same writer, Souvenirs de la R('vohition : Mes Parents, Deuxi^me Partie. Paris, 1902. " TJne Farnille Royaliste, Appendix, pp. 93-95. u 2 100 ILLUSTEATIONS OP IRISH HISTOEY I'oi'dre de vous offiir dans ce nouveau corps le meme rang de colonel que vous teniez dans I'ancien. L'intention de Sa Majeste est, que cette brigade soit noaintenant composee de quatre regiments, le commandement de trois desquels elle m'a ordonne d'offrir aux colonels (ou a leurs representans) qui ont commande las trois corps qui composoient la brigade lorsqu'elle etoit au service de Sa Majeste tr^s chretienne, et celui du quatrieme a Monsieur O'Connell, cy-devant officier general au service de France, et certainement bien connu de vous et de tous les gentilshommes irlandois qui ont servi dans ce corps. II a aussi plu a Sa Majeste de determiner que tous les oflBciers, tant de I'etat major que les autres, excepte vous. Monsieur le comte et Monsieur le due de Fitz James, seront pris d'entre ceux de ses sujets qui sont nes en Irlande, et qui se seront distingues par leurs services dans les memes grades dans la brigade, et que si Ton manque d'officiers (comma il y a toute apparence) pour remplir les grades inf^rieurs, on les choisisse dans les families des gentilshommes de la meme religion, dont la demeure a toujours ete en Irlande. L'intention de Sa Majeste est de plus, que cette brigade soit mise, du moment qu'elle sera complette, sur I'etat militaire de ce royaume, ou de celui d'Irlande, en sorte que, d6s ce moment-la, les officiers qui y tiendront des places prendront rang avec les autres officiers des armees de Sa Majeste, et en cas que le corps soit reforme, ils auront droit a la derni^re paye. Sa Majeste recevra aussi la recommandation des colonels dans le choix des officiers, et cela surtout, quand ces i-ecommandations seront faites en faveur de ceux qui ont servi cy-devant dans la brigade irlandoise. Mais elle ne permettra pas qu'aucune con- sideration pecuniere [sic] soit donnee pour obtenir aucun rang dans ce corps ; et en consequence, comme il n'aura 6te permis a aucun officier, de quelque rang qu'il soit, de rien payer pour sa place, il doit comprendre clairement, que sous aucun pretexte il ne lui sera permis de la vendre. Sa Majeste m'a commande aussi de vous informer qu'elle est determinee a ce que ce corps soit specialement affect^ au service des colonies de Sa Majesty dans les Antilles, ou dans telle autre possession de Sa Majeste, hors de ces deux royaumes de la Grande- Bretagne et d'Irlande, qu'il lui plaira de les employer ; et que Sa Majeste s'attendra a ce que tout officier de quelque rang qu'il soit, qui a I'honneur d'avoir un brevet dans ces coi'ps, se tiendra comme indispensablement oblige de venir avec son regiment dans quelque partie du monde que ce soit. THE lElSH GUAEDS 101 Sans entrer dans de plus grands details sur ce sujet, j'ajouterai seulement, a I'occasion de votre qualite de colonel proprietaive d'un des regiments de I'ancienne brigade irlandaise, qu'il est trfes essentiel que je vous rappelle, Monsieur lo Comte, que la constitu- tion de ce pays-ci n'admet aucune propriete semblable, attendu, comme vous devez vous le rappeler, que les fonds pour I'etablissement militaire ne sont accordes que pour I'annee, et que par consequent il ne peut avoir qu'une existence annuelle. Cependant, quoique place ne vous soit confiee par la legislature que pour un an, on doit en considerer la possession comme vous 6tant assuree durant votre bonne conduite, terme que je ne puis regarder de moindre duree que celui de votre vie. Je vous ai maintenant expose toutes les circonstances qui m'ont paru necessaires pour vous aider k determiner si vous devez accepter les offres gracieuses de Sa Majesty ; je n'ai qu'ajouter, que si, apres mure consideration, il vous parait plus convenable de ne pas vous en pr^valoir, la bonte naturelle de Sa Majesty la disposera a interpreter les motifs qui vous auront determine, de la maniere la plus favorable pour vous ; et je puis meme vous assurer, que dans le cas meme ou vous accepteriez la proposition que je suis charge de vous faire, et que la guerre finie, ou meme pendant sa duree, vous avez I'avis de quitter le service de Sa Majeste, et de rentrer a celui de Sa Majeste tres Chretienne, que vous trouverez le Eoi dispose de meme de vous accorder votre conge, et de considerer cette mesure avec sa bonte accoutumee. Je ne S9aurois douter, que vous n'ayez la bonte d'informer les officiers de la brigade, qui ont eu I'honneur de servir sous vos ordres, des intentions du Eoi, a leur egard, selon la forme et les conditions que je vous ai specifiees cy-dessus ; et que vous voudrez bien aussi leur recommander, le plutot possible, aquelque endroit convenable d'ou ils pourront le plus commodement se rendre en Irlande, et se mettre en etat de remplir les devoirs qui leur seront consignes de la part du Eoi. Je n'ai pas besoin de vous dire, que dans le cas ou vous vous decideriez a accepter la proposition que Sa Majeste m'a autorise a vous faire, il n'y aura pas un moment a perdre pour vous rendre iei, afin de regler tout ce qui a rapport a la lev6e des corps le plus promptement possible. II ne me reste qu'a vous prier d'etre assure, que je m'estime tr^s heureux d'avoir 6te autorise k vous donner ce temoignage, non equivoque, de la bonne opinion et I'estime de Sa Majeste. J'ai I'honneur d'etre, Monsieur le Comte, votre tres humble et tr^s obeissant serviteur, Portland. 102 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY Brevet de colonel d'infanterie {dans la brigade irlandaise) •pour Antoinc Walsh, Covite de Serrant, au nom du Boi Georges III. S021S la signature de lord Portland.^ Palace de S'. James, 1" Oct. 1794, George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &c., to our trusty and well beloved Antony, Count Walsh de Serrant, greeting : We reposing especial trust and confidence in your loyalty, courage, and good conduct, do by these presents constitute and appoint you to be Colonel of a Regiment of Foot, forming part of the corps known by the name of the Irish Brigade, and likewise to be a Captain of a company in our said regiment. You are therefore to take our said regiment as Colonel, and the said company as Captain into your care and charge, and duly to exercise as well the officers as soldiers thereof in arms, and to use your best endeavours to keep them in good order and discipline ; and we do hereby command them to obey you as their Colonel and Captain respectively ; and you are to observe and follow such orders and directions from time to time as you shall receive from us, or any other your superior officers, according to the rules and discipline of war, in pursuance of the trust we hereby repose in you. Given at our Court at St. James's, the first day of October, 1794 in the thirty-fourth year of our reign, By his Majesty's command. Portland. Anthony Count Walsh de Serrant, Colonel of a Regiment of Foot. ' Une Famille Boyaliste, Appendix, p. 95. IV THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND: THE IB ORIGIN, CONSTITUTION, AND GRADUAL DELIMITATION The dominating influence upon the development of any given race or people of the main physical characteristics of the land in vs^hich their lot is cast has long been understood by historians ; and the effects produced on the history of the M^orld, in modern times by the insular position of Great Britain, or in the world of the ancients by the peninsular position of Greece, are among the commonplaces of histori- cal criticism. What is not so much a commonplace is the extent of the influence exerted upon the domestic history of any community by the accidents of its early local history, and the degree in which archaic conditions of tribal division may survive in the modern organisation. For these divi- sions often continue for long centuries after their origin has passed into the partial oblivion of unexplained tradition, to mould the shape and form of a more advanced civilisation. The application of this principle to the case of Ireland is direct and obvious. For the local history of Ireland is, as has been acutely observed, in a special degree the backbone and foundation of its general history.^ Owing to what may be described as the inorganic character of the social structure in the Ireland of the Middle Ages, to the absence of a strong central government or settled constitution, capable of giving to the country and the people the impress of its own uni- formity, it is almost exclusively to clan or sept history, and ' See on this point the valuable essay by Mr. Eobert Dunlop on ' Some Aspects of Henry Vin.'s Irish Policy,' published in Otvens College Historical Essays, p. 279. 104 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY to the history of the particular areas with which the septs were associated, that we must chiefly look if we would seek to realise the body politic of the Ireland of a not very remote past. If this statement should appear at all exaggerated, let it suffice to note two simple but striking illustrations. As late as the reign of Henry VIII., in a memorandum on the State of Ireland, which is among the most instructive docu- ments in the Tudor State Papers, the names of the ' Irish regions,' and not the territorial divisions to which we are accustomed, are the units employed by the writer to describe by far the greater portion of the country.^ And in the Ehzabethan Map of Ireland, drawn by Dean Nowel, in the third quarter of the sixteenth century, division by territories or ' chief eries,' and not that by counties, is the method adopted.^ For down to the reign of Philip and Mary, as Sir John Davies observes in the lucid paragraphs devoted to the history of the shiring of Ireland in his well-known work : — * The provinces of Connaught and Ulster, and a good part of Leinster, were not reduced to shire ground. And though Munster were anciently divided into counties, the people were so degenerate as no justice durst execute his commission among them.' ^ To indicate the process by which these large districts were gradually brought within the ambit of English administration, and by which the counties of ' ' Who list make surmise to the King for the reformation of his land of Ireland, it is necessary to show him the estate of all the noble folk of the same, as well of the King's subjects and English rebels, as of the Iiish enemies. And first of all to make his Grace understand that there may be more than 60 countries, called regions in Ireland, inhabited with the King's Irish enemies ; some regions as big as a shire, some more, some less, unto a little ; some as big as half a shire and some a little less; where reigneth more than 60 chief captains . . . that liveth only by the sword and obeyeth to no other temporal persons, but only to himself that is strong . . . also there is no folk daily subject to the King's laws but half the county of Uriel, half the county of Meath, half the county of Dublin, and half the county of Kildare.'— ' The State of Ire- land and Plan for its Reformation.' State Papers of Henry VIII. ii. part iii. p. 1 (1834). - Copy of an ancient map in the British Museum by Laurence Nowel, Dean of Lichfield, ob. 1576. Printed by the Ordnance Survey Department. ' Discovery of the True Causes why Ireland ^cas never entirely Sub- dued, &c. THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 105 Ireland, as we now know them, came to be formed, is no easy task ; but the attempt is worth making, ' The civil distribution of Ireland,' to quote Bishop Keeves's most valuable paper on ' The Tovmland Distribu- tion of Ireland,' * in the descending scale, is into Provinces, Counties, Baronies, Parishes, and Townlands.' • But this highly convenient division of the surface of Ireland, as the bishop goes on to say, is characterised neither by unity of design nor by chronological order in its development. * The provinces, subject to one suppression and some inter- change of adjacent territories, represent a very ancient native partition which in the twelfth century was adopted for ecclesiastical purposes. The counties and baronies, though principally based on groupings of native lordships, are of Anglo-Norman origin, and range, in the date of their creation, from the reign of King John to that of James I. The parochial division is entirely borrowed from the Church, under which it was matured probably about the middle of the twelfth century ; while the townlands, the infima species, may reasonably be considered, at least in part, the earhest allotment in the scale.' With the two last of these grades of classification we have nothing to do here. But a word must be said regarding the third. The baronial division does not indeed present any very difficult problem. For though it be not easy to account for the adoption of the term * barony ' as signifying the division of a county,^ seeing that it has no such meaning in the territorial classification of Great Britain, there is no doubt that in general the baronies were successively formed on the submission of the Irish chiefs, the lands of each chieftain constituting a barony, and that they thus repre- ' Proceedings o the Royal Irish Academy, vii. p. 473. - ' The cause of the difference in name between the Irish baronies and English hundreds has been thus accounted for : When the kingdom of Meath was granted to the elder De Lacy, shortly after the arrival of the English, he portioned it out among his inferior barons, to hold under him by feudal service, and hence their estates naturally took the name of baronies, which gradually extended itself to similar subdivisions of other counties.' Hardi- man's 'Notes to the Statute of Kilkenny,' in Tracts relating to Ireland, ii. p. 108. 106 ILLUSTEATIONS OP lEISH HISTOEY sent more nearly than any other unit the ancient tribal territories.' The limits of the five kingdoms of what has been called the Irish Pentarchy, into which Ireland was anciently divided, correspond closely to those of the provincial divi- sions, as the latter were maintained down to the seventeenth century. They represent, as already noted, ' a very ancient native partition,' the adoption of which in the twelfth century, for ecclesiastical purposes, served to embalm a division of the island which, being purely artificial and based on no great physical boundaries, must otherwise have perished. The five provinces are shown separately as late as 1610 in Speed's map. For it was not until late in the reign of James I. that Meath ceased to be generally reckoned a separate province. In popular usage it long retained its provincial identity ; and Boate, writing under the Commonwealth, mentions the province as but lately merged in Leinster. The Ulster of unsubdued Ireland was conterminous with the modem province of that name, save that it included Louth — a fact commemorated in the still existing incorporation of that county in the see of Armagh and the northern ecclesiastical province—and that it did not include Cavan. Ancient Munster differed from the modern only by including within its bounds the territory of Ely (the O'CarroU country), which, represented by two baronies of the King's County, now forms a part of Leinster. Connaught included, in addition to its present territories, the county of Cavan, and a part of Longford ; while during the sixteenth century the earldom of Thomond or county of Clare oscillated, at the pleasure of successive deputies, between Munster and Connaught, giving to the latter, in the periods of its association with it, a predominance which the western province has long ceased to enjoy. Meath is substantially identical with the modern counties of Meath and Westmeath, and is practically con- ' The origin of the parochial system is much less easily traced ; and the relation between the diocesan areas and the provincial and county divisions is a subject which might well engage the attention of some of our ecclesiastical antiquaries. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 107 terminous with the diocese of Meath, though it seems to have also embraced a considerable portion of Longford ; while Leinster comprised the modern Leinster counties, less Louth, Meath, Westmeath, Longford, and the part of the King's County specified above. The first attempt at a division of Ireland into counties was, of course, subsequent to the Anglo-Norman conquest, and is commonly dated from the reign of King John. It is generally ascribed to the tenth year of that monarch's reign ; but it does not appear that this ascription, though doubtless substantially correct, rests upon any extant documentary authority of ancient date. It has been adopted, however, by every writer. Sir John Davies's account is as succinct and accurate as any other : ' True it is that King John made twelve shires in Leinster and Munster — namely, Dublin, Kildare, Meath, Urial or Louth, Catherlogh, Kil- kenny, Wexford, Waterford, Cork, Limerick, Kerry, and Tipperary. Yet these counties did stretch no further than the lands of the English colonies did extend.' Harris, in his additions to Ware's account of the division of Ireland,' asserts and, indeed, elaborately argues, that the twelve counties attributed to King John were really of earlier origin, and were, in fact, part of an earlier division effected by Henry II. Without a division into shires and the appointment of sheriffs, Henry's grant to Ireland of the laws of England would, in his opinion, have been no better than a mockery : * For without sheriffs, law would be a dead letter ; ' and without a shire there could be no sheriff. That there were sheriffs in Henry's reign Harris considers proved by the language of a patent to one Nicholas de Benchi, directed to all archbishops, bishops, sheriffs, &c. ; and that shires were known in Ireland prior to the tenth year of King John is shown by a patent of the seventh of that reign, in which the county of Waterford is distinguished from the city of that name. In further support of his thesis, Harris also argues that the division of Connaught into the two counties of Connaught and Roscommon is of earlier date ' Antiquities of Ireland, chap. v. 108 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY than King John's counties ; that, prior to the reign of Philip and Mary, Leix and Offaly were reckoned in Kildare, and other portions of the Queen's County in Carlow ; and that there were unquestionably sheriffs of Down and Newtownards, of Carrickfergus and Antrim, and of Coleraine, long prior to the division of Ulster into counties under Elizabeth. But though he would be a bold antiquary who would venture to controvert a proposition maintained by the erudition of Ware, the authority of Ware's laborious editor is hardly so formidable. It may at least be said that if the shiring of Ireland was really accomplished by Henry II., all substantial traces of that sovereign's work have perished ; and the historian must be content to start with King John. As has just been noted, there is no conclusive evidence now extant of the formation by King John of the twelve counties traditionally ascribed to him. And it is certain that though these divisions were probably known as separate geographical areas, they cannot in several instances, if in any, have formed counties in the modem administrative sense till a date considerably later than King John's reign. ^ For it must be remembered that the earliest grants of terri- tory by Henry II. were in the nature of counties palatine rather than of ordinary counties, though the term ' palatine ' nowhere occurs in any early instrument. And of the t\velve counties imputed to King John, five formed part of the single liberty or palatine county of Leinster. In order to follow the process of the development of the Irish counties, it is essential to have regard to this fact and to the conse- quences flowing from it. It is therefore necessary to digress here to give a brief account of the origin of the institu- tion of counties, and of the difference, in the extent and nature of their respective jurisdictions, between simple and palatine counties. The name and office of Count were derived from the Court of Charlemagne, and the institution of counties in ' See Hardiman's ' Notes to the Statute of Kilkenny ' in Tracts relating to Ireland, ii. p. 102. THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 109 England is of earlier date than the Norman Conquest.^ The creation of a count involved from the first a delegation of royal authority for legal and administrative purposes, and the ordinary county had two courts — the King's Court for criminal business, and the Earl's Court for civil causes. But the judicial officers and sheriffs were in all cases appointed by the Crown. Between a county palatine and an ordinary county the distinction was broad and well defined. Accord- ing to Blackstone, * counties palatine ' — of which there were in England the three great examples of Chester, Durham, and Lancaster, besides the smaller ones of Hexham and Pembroke — ' are so called a palatio, because the owners of them had formerly in those counties jura regalia as fully as the King in his palace.' " The Earl of a county was Lord of all the land in his shire that was not Church land ; and his jurisdiction was equivalent in all essential points to the jurisdiction of the King in an ordinary county.^ Thejwra regalia included a royal jurisdiction and a royal seignory. By virtue of the first the Earl Palatine had the same high courts and officers of justice as the King ; by virtue of the second he had the same royal services and escheats, and could even create barons, as was certainly done in Chester. Included in the power to appoint officers of justice was the appointment of the sheriff ; and with the functions of the sheriff in the palatinate no King's sheriff might interfere. And, therefore, says Sir John Davies, ' such county is merely [absolutely] disjoined and separated from the Crown, so that no King's writ runs there, except a writ of error, which being the last resort and appeal is excepted out of all their charters.' ^ The origin of these immense delegations of royal power was of course the inability of the Sovereign in early times to establish an efficient administrative system throughout his realm ; and the same considerations which compelled resort to the palatine system in England by the early ' Selden's Titles of Honour, p. 694. ^ Stephen's Blackstone, i. p. 131. ^ Stubbs's Constitutional History, i. p. 3G3. ■• Sir J. Davies's 'Reports des cases et matters en Ley,' Le Case del Countie Palatine de Weixford, p. G2. no ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY Norman kings, rendered necessary the application of an analogous method of administration in Ireland by Henry II. In the case of England, where the central authority was strong, the palatinates were limited to the march or border districts, as Chester on the Welsh, and Durham on the Scottish or Northumbrian borders. In the case of Ireland, the Crown having practically no authority in the interior of the island, the policy of Henry II. was to hand over the country to Strongbow and his followers, with powers practi- cally co-extensive with the powers of the Crown, but subject to and excepting any grants of Church lands. Only the sea-coast towns and the territories immediately adjacent were reserved to the Sovereign. And it was in these latter districts only that for a long period the authority of the English kings had any direct force in Ireland. Accordingly, as Sir John Davies, with his usual insight, observes, all Ireland was ' cantonised ' by Henry II. among persons of the English nation, who, ' though they had not gained the possession of one- third part of the whole king- dom, yet in title they were owners and lords of all, so as nothing was left to be granted to the natives.' Of these grants at least three — those of Leinster to Strongbow, of Meath to De Lacy, and of Ulster to De Courcy — were grants of royal jurisdiction equivalent to palatinates ; and most probably all were intended to be such. It is clear at all events that the liberty of Leinster was confirmed by King John in right of Strongbow's daughter to William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, and that, on the division of Leinster among the five co-heiresses of the latter, the five divisions of Carlow, Kilkenny, Wexford, Kildare, and Leix were regarded as separately enjoying, within their respective territories, the same palatine privileges which had appertained to the undivided liberty of Leinster. That Leinster was long considered as preserving its palatine privileges may be seen by the statute 25 Edw^ard I., in which ' the whole com- munity of Leinster ' is referred to as * lately but one liberty.' Of the remaining palatinates or liberties, Meath was divided between Matilda and Margaret, granddaughters of THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND ill that Hugo de Lacy to whom its territories had originally been granted. Of these ladies Matilda married Geoffrey de Geneville or Joinville, a brother of the famous crusader and author of the ' Vie de St. Louis,' while Margaret married John de Verdon. The moiety known as the liberty of Trim passed to the Crown through the marriage of a descendant of Matilda de Lacy with Mortimer, Earl of March ; while the second half, descending to the Talbots, Earls of Shrewsbury, was resumed by Henry VIII. under the Statute of Absentees.^ Ulster, originally granted to De Courcy, was re-granted by John to the De Lacys, and descending through a daughter to the De Burghs, and thence to the Mortimers, ultimately became vested in the Crown in the person of Edward IV., as the descendant of Lionel, Duke of Clarence. Connaught, granted to the De Burghs, also passed technically with Ulster to the Crown ; though the rebellion of the younger branch of the Burkes, on the failure of heirs male of the elder, deprived the legal title of the Crown of all its effective force. The union of all these territories in the Crown of England is incidentally recognised in an Act of Parliament of Henry VII. 's reign, ^ which, reciting that 'the Earldoms of March, Ulster, the Lordships of Trim and Con- naught, bin annexed to our sovereign lord the King's most noble Crown,' makes provision for the better keeping of the records of those ancient dignities, the title to which had been jeopardised by the loss of the muniments. This Act expressly refers to ' Eichard, late Duke of York,' as lord of Trim.^ The extent and character of the privileges of a county ' Stat. 28 Henry VIII. cap. iii. ^ An Act touching the keeping of Records of the Earldomes of Marche, Connaught, Trym, and Ulster, 15 Henry VII. c. 15. * Selden, in his Titles of Honour (third edition, p. 694), has a reference to the use of the name and oiiice of Palatine Earl in Ireland, which seems to state the facts with the nearest possible approach to accuracy : — ' The title of local Earl Palatine, as well as of other Earls, occurs in the Records of that Kingdom. But I do not believe that any man was ever created into the title of Count Palatine there, or the County expressly made a County Palatine by Patent ; but as in other countries, so here, the enjoying of the title of earl (and some- times of lord), together with a territory annexed to that title, wherein all royal jurisdiction might be exercised, was the original whence in speech and writing the title of Earl Palatine or Count Palatine grew.' This was written in 1614 ; 112 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY palatine or liberty of England appear by the Charter of Edward III. to John of Gaunt for the palatinate of Lan- caster — a dignity which, owing to the prudent sagacity of Henry IV., has been preserved in its ancient independence and prerogatives almost down to the present day. Anxious that the hereditary honours of his dukedom should be secured to him, even should fortune deprive him of a usurped crown, Henry, on attaining to the throne, had an Act passed pro- viding that the duchy of Lancaster should remain in himself and his heirs in like manner as though he had never acceded to the royal dignity. But the precise character of the jurisdiction conferred by King John on the early palatine counties of Ireland does not appear from any extant documents. If, however, as it seems reasonable to suppose, the later jurisdictions conferred by Edward III. were similar in their general scope, its nature may be gathered from the records of the palatinate of Tipperary. The process of Quo Warranto by which James I. resumed possession of Tipperary enumerates the courts and offices which existed at the beginning of the sixteenth century, and which, doubtless, represented in all essentials the palatine constitution of earlier times. The jurisdiction, authorities, and liberties set out in the Quo Warranto of James I. were restored on the reconstitution of the palatinate in 1662 in favour of James, first Duke of Ormond, with the exception (which appears to have been a reservation common to all palatine grants) of the four pleas of arson, rape, forestalling, and treasure trove, as originally reserved in the grant of Edward III ^ in 1328 to James le Botiller, first earl of Ormond. and it is noteworthy that Selden's view as to the title of palatine is confirmed by the Patent of Charles II. to the Duke of Ormond in 1660 for the county Tipperary. Tipperary was an undoubted palatinate ; yet neither the Patent nor the Act of 2 George I. cap. 8, by which it was revoked, contains the term ' Palatine ' ; but speak only of the regalities and liberties of Tipperary. ' The following are among the more important of the privileges vested in the Earls of Ormond within their palatinate : — 1. To have and to hold within the county of Tipperary one Curia Cancel- laricE, commonly called a Chancery Court, and to make, appoint, and constitute one Cancellarins, or officer of the same Court, commonly called a Chancellor, which Chancellor, under colour of such his office, makes and causes to be made all THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 113 In tracing the position of the Irish counties through the obscure complexity of Irish administration under the Planta- genet kings, the only guide whom we may follow with any degree of confidence is the Sheriff, The whole machinery of local or county administration in Plantagenet times practically centred in the sheriff, who united the threefold functions of a civil officer in relation to the courts of law ; of returning officer in relation to the election of parliament- ary representatives ; and of revenue collector in relation to the royal exchequer. Owing to the destruction in the reigns of the first two Edwards of most of the early records of the kingdom of Ireland, the materials available in regard to Plantagenet sheriffs are unhappily meagre ; and the Act of Henry VII. already referred to indicates the paucity of the kinds of original writs and other processes in all actions, as well real as personal and mixed, within the aforesaid county arising, occurring, or happening, . . . 2. And also to have and to hold within the aforesaid county one other Court of Pleas of the Crown of the said Lord the now King, and to make, appoint, and constitute one other officer or Seneschallus, commonly called a Seneschal, and one other officer or Justiciarius, commonly called a Justice, to hold Pleas of the Crown of the said Lord the King. . . . 3. And also to have and to hold within the aforesaid county one other Court of Common Pleas held before the aforesaid Seneschal and Justice. . . . 4. And also yearly to nominate, appoint, make, and constitute in the same county one other officer, viz., one Vicecovies, commonly called a Sheriff, for the custody of the same county, which sheriff makes execution of all writs, &c. issuing and directed to the same sheriff from the four courts of the said Lord the King held at the King's Courts in the county of the City of Dublin also from the Justices assigned ... to take the assizes in the county of Tipperary aforesaid, as well as from the aforesaid Chancellor, Justice, and Seneschal in the same county. . . . And he holds in the same county divers Courts of Turn Leet, and Curia; Comitafus, called County Courts. . . . 5. And moreover to have and appropriate to themselves the power of grant- ing charters of Pardon, and ad pardonmulum— Anglice, to pardon — whatsoever persons are suspected, accused, convicted, outlawed, condemned, or attainted of any transgressions, felonies and treasons, and misprisions of felonies or treasons by them within the aforesaid county in any wise done, committed, or per- petrated. . . . And further to do and execute within the aforesaid county all other things whatsoever which appertain to any Earl of any County Palatine to be done or executed. 6. And also to make, appoint, and constitute in the aforesaid county Tipperary divers other officers, viz., one or more Coroners, and one Escheator and one Feodary . , , and one Clerk of the Markets, . . . and one Sub-vicecomes, commonly called a Sub-sheriff'. . . . — Fifth Reiiort of ilie Deputy Keeper of the Public Records of Ireland, pp. 34-36, I 114 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY records of several of the greater earldoms. But a study of the Plea Kolls, Pipe Eolls, and Patent Kolis, as well as of the Plantagenet Statutes, so far as these survive, is not wholly fruitless ; and the last-mentioned source is fairly rich in references to the functions and office of the sheriff. An ex- amination of these sources establishes, at least negatively, the fact that from the time of King John to that of the Tudors no new county was formed, or if formed that it did not survive. It also shows that no sheriff was created for any new district, with the single exception caused by the subdivision of the great territory of Connaught into the separate dis- tricts of Connaught and Eoscommon.^ It is impossible to say how much or how little of Connaught was intended to be included in Koscommon, or precisely when the division was made. But the separation is certainly as old as the thirteenth century, and Koscommon is among the counties and liberties whose respective sheriffs and seneschals were directed by the Statute 25 Ed. I. (1296) to return to the * general parliament ' held in Dublin in that year * two of the most honest and discreet knights of each county or liberty.' ^ This vagueness of the territorial divisions and of the shrievalties associated with them was not confined to the western province, but was characteristic of all the so-called counties of King John. And this was especially so in the case of the Leinster counties, whose south-western borders were probably in a state of continuous flux. Thus in 1297 a list of coroners of Kildare shows that county to have included Offaly, Leix, and Arklow, and therefore to have extended far over its present borders into the modern counties of King's County, Queen's County, and Wicklow. The broad distinction which was drawn between counties ordinary and counties palatine was reflected in the designa- tion of the most important office in their respective jurisdic- tions. In the county proper that officer is invariably styled ' See Hardiman's ' Statute of Kilkenny ' in Tracts relating to Irelaiid, ii. p. 106. - The following is the enumeration in the Statute : — ' Likewise the Sheriffs of Dublin, Louth, Kildare, Waterford, Tipperary, Cork, Limerick, Kerry, Con- naught, and Roscommon ; and also the Seneschals of the liberties of Meath, Weysford, Katherlagh, Kilkenny, and Ulster.' See Betham's History of the Constitution of England aiid Ireland, p. 262. THE COUNTIES GF lEELAND 115 sheriff ; but in the county palatine he is uniformly referred to as ' the seneschal of the liberty.' The distinction is clearly marked in a mandate of Edward III. to the Treasury of Ireland, which directs that ' because the liberty of Carlow has been taken into the King's hands ' ' the writs of the Ejng for execution should be directed to the sheriff of Carlow, in place of the late seneschal of that liberty.^ It appears, however, that a general jurisdiction lay in the sheriff" of Dublin for districts not clearly belonging to a specific county or liberty, or wherever the seneschal of the latter should be found in default, as in the case of Kildare prior to the Statute of 25 Edward I. In 18 Edward II. precepts were issued to the sheriffs of Dublin and Meath to execute writs ' in spite of the liberties of Kildare and Louth ' ; but this interference with the general principle of palatine independence was doubtless exceptional, and probably due to the disorganisation resulting from the Bruce invasion. For so extensive were the privileges of the liberties that, though the King might and did appoint sheriffs within their limits, the authority of the royal officers extended only to the Church lands, whence they were known as sheriffs of the County of the Cross. Of such counties there must originally have been as many in Ireland as there were counties palatine ; ^ but with the gradual absorption of the palatinates in the Crown, either by inheritance, as in the case of Ulster, or by forfeiture, as in that of Wexford, they had all ceased to exist before the reign of Henry VIII., except the county of the Cross of Tipperary, which being within the great Ormond palatinate, created by Edward III., survived till Stuart times. Whatever the precise origin of the counties so generally ascribed to King John, there appears to be no doubt that the ' This had been done by virtue of Edward III.'s arbitrary but temporary revocation of all franchises, liberties, and grants formerly made in the kingdom of Ireland — a measure doubtless intended primarily as an answer to the renun- ciation by the Bourkes of Connaught of their allegiance to the Crown, and to the general disorganisation which had followed the wars of the Bruces. - Cal. Patent and Close Rolls. No. 2 Close Koll, 17 & 18 Edward III. ^ In the list of Proffers and Fines of Sheriffs and Seneschals in the time of Edward III., Sheriffs of the Cross are mentioned for the Crosses of Kilkenny, Tipperary, Carlow, Wexford, Kerry, Kildare, Meath, and Ulster. 116 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY writs, either of the King or of his palatines, ran in all of them for a full century from John's time, and that these counties represent the extent of the effective predominance of English power down to the invasion of Edward Bruce in 1315. Prior to that event some efforts seem to have been made to extend the counties to Ulster, and to define more accurately the limits of theLeinster counties. An Act of 25 Edward I. (1296), for the settlement of Ireland, enacted that ' hence- forward there shall be a certain sheriff in Ulster, and that the sheriff of Dublin shall not intermeddle henceforth in Ulster.' Meath was declared to be a county by itself ; and Kildare, which had been regarded as a liberty of Dublin, was discharged from the jurisdiction of the Dublin sheriff, and given an independent position. But from the wars of the Bruces the English colony received a blow from which it did not recover until the Plantagenets had been replaced by the Tudors. The authority of the State, so far as it was effective in the interior of the island, was only exerted through the medium of the three great earldoms of Ormond, Des- mond, and Kildare, all of which dated from the fourteenth century. The area under the direct control of the Crown was narrowed continually, until after a lapse of precisely two centuries more the boundaries of the English Pale had shrunk to its lowest limits, and, in the quaint language of Stani- hurst, were ' cramperned and crouched into an odd corner of the country named Fingal, with a parcel of the King's land of Meath and the counties of Kildare and Louth.' Thus from the reign of Edward II. to that of Henry VIII. the extension of the Irish counties was politically impossible.^ ' The Pale at this period is thus described in the State Paper of Henry VIII. already referred to : — ' Also the English Pale doth stretch and extend from the town of Dundalk to the town of Derver, to the town of Ardee, alway on the left side leaving the march on the right side, and so to the town of Sydan, to the town of Kenlys,* to the town of Dangle.t to Kilcock, to the town of Clane, to the town of Naas, to the bridge of Cucullyn,| to the town of Ballyniore,§ and so backward to the town of Ramore.ll and to the town of Kathcoole, to the town of Tallaght, to the town of Dalkey, leaving alway the march on the right hand from the said Dundalk following the said course to the said town of Dalkey.'^ — State Papers of Henry VIII. ii. part iii. p. 22. * Kells. t Dangan. J Kilcullen. § Ballymore-Eustace. || Kathmore. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 117 That the shrinking of the EngHsh Pale had been accompanied by a parallel diminution of the interest in and knowlege of the country possessed by the English sovereigns may be sufficiently inferred from the language used in 1537 in a ' Memorial for the Winning of Leinster,' addressed by the Irish to the EngHsh Council, which begins by reciting that ' Because the country called Leinster and the situation thereof is unknown to the King and his Council, it is to be understood that Leinster is the fifth part of Ireland.' ^ But from this period, nevertheless, may properly be dated the revival of English authority. In 1541 the resolution of the Sovereign himself to convert his long nominal lordship of Ireland into an effective supremacy was shown by the Act constituting Henry VIII. King of Ireland. This was the pre- lude to the adoption of that policy of converting the chiefs of the Irish septs into the immediate feudatories of the Crown which led directly to the conversion of the lands without the Pale into districts cognisable by English law, and ultimately to their formation into modern counties. Little, indeed, was done under Henry VIII. towards defining the county boundaries, the only actual change in the map being the severance of Westmeath from Meath by an Act of Henry VIII.^ But though the proverb quoted by Sir John Davies continued to hold good during the reign of Henry VIII., that * whoso lives by west of the Barrow, lives west of the law,' the area of the anglicised districts steadily increased. The greater part of Leinster was in this and the succeeding reign gradually won back to what was called ' civility ' ; till towards the close of Elizabeth's reign the Pale was un- derstood to extend through all Leinster, Meath, and Louth.^ The first step in this process of restoration, and the first real addition to the list of Irish counties made since King John's time, was the formation of the King's and ' State Pa2yers of Henry VIII. ii. part iii. - 34 Henry VIII. cap. i. Aoi Act for tlie division of MetJie into two Shires. ^ See A Pcrambnlatioji of Leinster, Meath, and Louth, of which consist tlie English Pale in 1596. Carew Cal. iii. p. 188. See Appendix I. to this paper, for particulars of boundaries of counties not printed in the Carew Calendar. 118 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Queen's Counties in the time of Philip and Mary. The districts of Leix and Offaly, the territories of the powerful septs of the O'Moores and O'Connors, were in that reign reduced to subjection, during the Viceroyalty of the Earl of Sussex, who, in the words of Sir John Davies, ' took a resolution to reduce all the rest of the Irish counties unre- duced into several shires.' Sussex was the first of the Tudor Deputies to acquire a really systematic personal acquaintance with the country he was sent to govern ; and the accounts of his journeys through the provinces,^ between the years 1556 and 1563, together with his reports to Mary and Ehzabeth of the results of his observations, are among the most valu- able of the Irish State Papers of that age. Sussex proposed to divide Ireland into six parts, viz. Ulster, Connaught, Upper Munster, Nether Munster, Leinster, and Meath ; and he enumerates in his report the countries which these divisions respectively comprised. But though he appears to have been the first Viceroy to conceive any large plan for an efficient administrative settlement of Ireland, Sussex was recalled before he had had time to grapple effectively with that problem of the shiring of Ireland which he saw lay at the root of all real administrative reform. But at least he made a beginning. It is worthy of remark, too, that Sussex is the only Deputy who, in addition to creating fresh counties, gave to his creations names not borrowed from the territories by which they were constituted.^ In 1556 there was passed the statute ^ ' whereby the King's and Queen's Majesties, and the heirs and successors of the Queen,' were declared entitled to the countries of Leix, Slew- margy, Irry, Glenmaliry, and Offaly, and provision was made for making these countries shire ground. After reciting that these countries had been subdued in the previous reigns, but ' See Carew Cal. i. pp. 257, 265, 274, 330, 349. - The case of Londonderry is an exception to this statement more apparent than real. In its first form, the county of Londonderry was kno\^Ti as Coleraine, taking its name from the considerable town within its boundaries. The county of Coleraine included, however, only the northern portion of the modern county of Londonderry. ^ 3 & 4 Philip and Mary, cap. ii. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 119 had rebelled and been again reduced by the Queen's Deputy, Thomas Radcliffe Fitzwalter, Earl of Sussex, the statute pro- ceeds thus : — ' And for that neither of the said countries is known to be within the limits of any shires or counties of this realm, be it enacted that the King and Queen, and the heirs and successors of the Queen, shall have, hold, and possess for ever, as in the right of the Crown of England and Ireland, the said countries of Leix, Slewmargy, Irry, Glenmaliry, and Offaly.' A further section provided that ' to the end that the same countries may be from hence- forth the better conserved and kept in civil government, the new fort in Leix be from henceforth for ever called and named Maryborough, and the countries of Leix, Slewmargy, Irry, and part of Glenmaliry be one shire and county named the Queen's County ' ; and, similarly, that the new fort in Offaly should be named Philipstown, and the country of Offaly and part of Glenmaliry be called the King's County. That the Government of the Earl of Sussex contemplated a further extension of the policy embodied in this Act appears from the statute immediately succeeding it, ' to convert and turn divers and sundry waste grounds into shire ground.' ^ This act provided for the appointment of commissioners ' to view, survey, and make inquiry of all the towns, villages, and waste grounds of the realm now being no shire grounds,' with power to the commissioners to erect such districts into counties. Little was done in this short reign, or for some years afterwards, to give effect to this enactment. But widely as the general policy of Elizabeth differed from that of her predecessor, her attitude towards Ireland was in principle the same as Mary's. A statute passed in 1569 ' for turning of countries that be not yet shire grounds into shire grounds,' substantially re-enacted the earlier legislation.^ And the task ' 3 & 4 Philip and Mary, cap. iii. - 11 Elizabeth, cap. ix. The preamble, which is the same in both statutes, is worth quoting as showing the principle on which this policy of shiring was based : — ' Whereas divers and sundry robberies, murders, felonies, and other heinous offences be daily committed and done within the sundry countries, territories, cantreds, towns, and villages of this realm being no shire ground, to the great loss both of the C^ueen's JNlajesty and of divers and sundry her Highness 120 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY of giving effect to these provisions was confided by Elizabeth in a great measure to the same statesmen who had devised them under Mary, Though the actual delimitation of the counties was not finally settled until, in the reign of James I., it was accom- plished by Sir Arthur Chichester with the assistance of Sir John Davies, the business of shiring Ireland, in the sense of formally naming and constituting the county divisions of Connaught, Ulster, and part of Leinster under their modern designations, was practically the work of the last two Tudor Sovereigns. Their policy was carried out by three states- men of eminence — the Earl of Sussex, Sir Henry Sidney, and Sir John Perrot. And as in the case of the final measures taken in the reign of James I. to perfect the county system we have been provided by the chief agent of the work, Sir John Davies, with a vivid description of the proceedings, so in the case of the earlier and more tentative steps taken under Elizabeth, we have the advantage of an authentic narrative by one of the principal actors. The part played by the Earl of Sussex has just been noticed.' Sussex true subjects of this realm, and to the boldening and encouraging of many offenders.' ' The amorphous state of the county system prior to Sidney's time is sufficiently illustrated by the report of Sussex to Elizabeth in 1562. Report of Earl of Snssex to Elizabeth, Carew Cal. i. 330. Ulster. — ' The county of Lowthe, O'Donell's country, O'Cane's, McGwyre's, McMahon's, Femes O'Hanlon's, Clandonell's, MeGenysse's, Tirone, McWylU's, the Glynnes.Clandeboye, Kyhvowltoughe, Arde, McArtan's, Le Cayle, Kywarlyne, the Dufferne. Connaught.—' The Earl of Clanricarde's country, MeWylliam Burke, O'Conor Slego, O'Connor Donne, O'Conor Roe, McDermote, O'Kelly, O'Madden, O'Flarty, the Annaly, O'Mayle, O'Ewrerke. ' O'Raili's country is taken to be within Connaught, but because it lieth fitter for another government, and bordereth upon the English Pale, I leave it out of the government of Connaught.' Mimster. — ' The Nether Munster on the south and east side of the River of Shanon is all shire ground, saving O'CaroU's country, which I leave to the government of the Captain of the King and Queen's counties and marches ad- joining, for that it bordereth upon them, and upon the north and west side on the Earl of Thomond's country called Thomond, who seeketh to bring his people to live under the obedience of the law. 'In this Munster be the counties of Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Tipperary, Water- ford.' THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 121 was followed by the gifted and valiant Sir Henry Sidney, Not only has that ablest of Elizabethan Deputies left detailed accounts of his progress through the provinces, but he has given in a memoir of his services in Ireland, drawn up in 1583, a striking statement of the Irish policy of Eliza- beth in the first half of her reign, and a full summary of the proceedings taken by him to reduce the back woods of Ireland to shire ground. The circumstances in which this memoir was written add to its intrinsic value the piquancy of an interesting historical association. For the occasion of the narrative was the then approaching marriage of the writer's son, Sir Philip Sidney, the chivalrous author of the ' Arcadia,' to the daughter of Sir Francis Walsingham, a lady whose fate it was to be successively the wife of Philip Sidney, of Eobert Devereux, the unfortunate Earl of Essex, and of the third Earl of Clanricarde. The memoir, which was written primarily as an apology for Sidney's inability to make a sufficient settlement on his son, explains how his expenses as the representative of the Queen in Ireland, and the neglect of the Sovereign to relieve his impoverished fortune, had reduced him to a position of ' biting necessity,' which prevented him from making such provision as he desired for his much-loved son. ' Three times,' wrote Sidney to Walsingham, ' her Majesty hath sent me her Deputy into Ireland, and in every of the three times I sustained a great and violent rebellion, every one of which I sub- dued, and with honourable peace left the country in quiet. I returned from each of those deputations three thousand pounds worse than I went.' ^ Leinstcr and Mcath. — ' Leinster has within it these countries : the counties of DubUn, Kildave, Catheiiawgh, Wexford, and Kilkenny : the Byrnes Irish and within the county of Dublin, the Tooles, Irish and within the county of Dublin ; the Kavenawghes, Irish and within the County of Catherlowgh, the lord of Upper Ossory, Irish, but holdeth his land by state tayly ; O'Dunne, Irish, O'Mawher, Irish, the Queen's and the King's counties lately conquered. ' Meath has in it these countries : the counties of Meath and Westmeath ; O'MuUoy and the Fox, supposed to be in Westmeath ; McGohegan, McCowghlan and O'Mullawhlen, supposed to be in Westmeath.' ' The accounts of Sidney's provincial journeys have been printed in the Ulster Ardiaological Society's Journal (Original Series), vol. iii. et seq. 122 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTOEY Sidney's contribution to the formation of the Irish counties consisted in the main in the shiring of Connaught. In 1566, in the first of his three Viceroyalties, he took the first step in this undertaking by providing efiicient and permanent means of communication between Dubhn and the western province. ' I gave order,' he writes, ' for the making of the bridge of Athlone, which I finished, a piece found serviceable ; I am sure durable it is, and I think memorable.' A few years later a bridge over the Suck at Ballinasloe, ' being in the common passage to Galway,' was constructed by Sir Nicholas Malby at Sidney's direction. This was the necessary preliminary to any effective assertion of English law in the remoter parts of the country. It was followed by the division of Connaught into four of the five counties of which it now consists, viz. Sligo, Mayo, Gal- way, and Koscommon. With these Clare was temporarily associated. In his ' orders to be observed by Sir Nicholas Malby for the better government of the province of Con- naught,' issued in 1579, Sidney's reasons for this arrange- ment are thus given: — 'Also, we think it convenient that Connaught be restored to the ancient bounds, and that the Government thereof be under j^ou, especially all the lands of Connaught and Thomond, being within the waters of Shannon, Lough Ree, and Lough Erne.' In the same document suggestions are made for the appointment of ' safe places for the keeping of the Assizes and Cessions.' Sligo, Bures (Burris hoole), Roscommon, and Ballinasloe are respectively designated as suitable county towns. ^ Leitrim comprising O'Rorke's country was for the present excluded. It was not reduced to a county until Perrot's time in 1583. But the country of the O'Ferralls, called the Annaly, and the territory of the O'Reillys, or East Breny, both of which, as already noted, were then reckoned in Connaught, were formed into the modern counties of Longford and Cavan.^ East Breny w^as described at the time by Sir ' SeeO'Flahetty'sChorographical Description of West or H-Iar Connaught, ed. Hardiman, p. 305. - Sussex appears to have designed to add Cavan to Leinster rather than THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 123 Nicholas Bagnal as ' a territory where never writ was cur- rent,' and which it was ahnost sacrilege for any Governor of Ireland to look into. The precise allotment of these counties among the provinces seems to have been left open, for Sidney, as will appear in a moment, was solicitous lest Connaught, which he had already extended in another direction, should become disproportionately large. The district of Thomond had always been reckoned a part of the southern province. Indeed, the name signified North Munster, and its people were a Munster people. But Munster was a troublesome responsibility in Sidney's time ; and the Deputy, who was then forming the system of Presi- dencies by which for the next seventy years the provinces of Munster and Connaught were to be administered, desired to reduce its importance.' He therefore ignored this ancient division, and taking the Shannon as a natural boundary (the province, if we exclude Leitrim, being thus, as the author of the ' Description of Ireland in 1598 ' has it, ' in manner an island '), he added this large territory to Connaught. ' Thomond, a limb of Munster, I annexed to the President of Connaught by the name of the County of Clare,' is Sidney's concise summary of this important transaction.^ In his instructions to Malby, already cited, the north part of the city of Limerick was suggested as the * shire town,' ' because a jury may be had there for the orderly trial of all country causes.' But the President was directed to choose some apt place in Thomond ; and Quin, Killaloe, and Ennis were suggested as suitable. We may pause at this point to consider the subsequent administrative history of Thomond. It continued to be in- cluded under its new designation of Clare in the government of Connaught almost to the end of Elizabeth's reign. It was then erected into an entirely distinct division, and governed as a separate entity under a separate commission, Ulster. ' O'Keilly,' he writes, ' bordering upon Meath, and lying by situation of his country unfit for any of the other Governments, is to be under the order of the principal governor.' — Carew Caleridar, i. .838. ' ' Reasons for retaining Thomond in Connaught.' — Ibid. iv. p. 471. ' Collins's Sydney Papers, i. p. 75. 124 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY by Donagh, Henry, and Barnaby, successive Earls of Thomond.^ In 1639, however, under Strafford's govern- ment, it was arranged that on the death of the last-mentioned earl the territory should be re-annexed to Munster ; and though the ensuing disturbances delayed the fulfilment of this intention, the county of Clare was finally reunited to Munster at the Kestoration. But to revert to Sir Henry Sidney. If he was successful in his operations in the distant province of Connaught, he was less fortunate, not only in the north, where, indeed, the conditions were hardly ripe for such work, but in a district much nearer to the seat of his government. It is certain that the county of Dublin was originally much larger than its present area indicates ; and it appears probable that it anciently extended from Skerries, in the north, to Arklow, in the south. It had been conterminous, in fact, as has been pointed out, with the ancient Scandinavian kingdom of Dublin — a territory still marked for us by the ecclesiastical division of the United Dioceses of Dublin and Glenda- lough.^ But the Danish rulers of DubHn troubled them- selves little about the interior of the country,^ and it is doubtful whether at any time prior to Henry VIII. the wild septs of the Byrnes and Tooles, whose incursions in the neighbourhood of the city Stanihurst describes so graphically, had given even a nominal recognition to the Norman or English power. In the thirty-fourth year of that monarch's reign these septs are said to have petitioned the Lord Deputy and Council to make their country shire ground, and to call it the county of Wicklow ; but nothing came of the proposal.'* Be that as it may, the sway of these Wicklow chieftains was exercised without dispute down to Sidney's day right up to the near neighbourhood of Dublin, and the inhabitants were ever, as Davies observes, ' thorns in the side of the Pale.' Indeed it may be said that ' Liber Micnerwn Hibernics, pt. ii. p. 185. - Haliday's Scandinavian Kingdom of Dtiblin, pp. 139 and 246. ^ Stokes's Ireland and the Celtic Church, p. 277. * Book of Howth, Carerv Cal. p. 454. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 125 the whole country south-west of Dublin, including large portions of Kildare, Carlow, and Wexford, as well as the modern Wicklow, long remained a rude ' hinterland ' into which law and order seldom penetrated. The State Papers are full of such entries as this of 1537— 'Devices for the ordering of the Kavanaghes, the Byrnes, Tooles, and O'Mayles for such lands as they shall have within the County of Carlow and the marches of the same county, and also of the marches of the County Dublin,' — which plainly show the unsettled state of the boundaries of these districts. In 1578, however, a commission issued under the Act of 11th Elizabeth and ' the Birns' and Tooles' country with the glens that lie by south and by east of the County of Dublin was bounded out into a shire, to be named and called the County of Wicklow.'^ But though this commission was carried out, and the boundaries of the counties defined by Sir William Drury, who succeeded Sidney in the Irish govern- ment, the troubles of Elizabeth's later years in Munster and Ulster left little leisure to her Deputies to attend to the Wicklow septs. The Byrnes and Tooles resumed their independence ; and in 1590, as Sir George Carew wrote, * those that dwell within sight of the smoke of Dublin ' were not subject to the laws.^ When Sir Arthur Chichester came to complete the work Sidney had begun a generation earlier, of ' adding or reducing to a county certain, every bordering territory whereof doubt was made in what county the same should lie,' ^ he found that the mountains and glens of Dublin were almost as far as ever from ' civility,' and contained such a multitude of untutored natives that it seemed strange that 'so many souls should be nourished in these wild and barren mountains.' The shiring of Wicklow was finally accomplished only in 1606, and it thus fell out that the county nearest to the metropolis was of all the last to be brought effectively within the scope of English government. In connection with this attempt towards the formation of ' Fiant of Elizabeth, No. 3603, Irish Kecord Office. - Carew Cal. iii. p. 44. '■' Sir J. Davies's Discovery 126 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY the county Wicklow, Sidney had also a project for dividing Wexford into two shires, of which the northern part should be called Ferns. This county, severed by the Wicklow mountains from the metropolis, had, though less disturbed than its neighbours, been practically outside the Pale.^ The southern part of it, indeed, according to a 'Description of the Provinces of Ireland,' written about the year 1580, was ' civil,' that part contained within a river called Pill (a name given to the estuary of the Bannow) being inhabited by ' the ancientest gentleman descended of the first conquerors.' But this district was connected with the capital by sea only, and the rest of the county was inaccessible. Sidney and Sir William Drury, finding ' that there were no sufficient and sure gentlemen to be sheriffs, nor freeholders to make a jury, for her Majesty,' the project was let drop. Their successor. Sir John Perrot, had the same object in view, and in a report to Elizabeth, ' how the natives of Ireland might with least charge be reclaimed from barbarism to a godly govern- ment,' ^ he gives a picturesque account of the condition of the south-eastern counties and the need which existed for providing a proper system of administration. * The Birnes, Tooles, and Kavanaghs must be reduced.' They are 'ready firebrands of rebelhon to the O'Moores and O'Connors, and till they be brought under or extirped, Dubhn, Kildare, Meath, Westmeath, and the King's and Queen's Comity cannot be clear either of them or of the O'Moores or O'Connors, or of the incursions and spoils of the McGeoghegans, O'Molloys, and other Irish borderers.' But though he stated the difficulty thus vigorously, Perrot, like Sidney, left Ireland without doing anything effective to remedy it. Sir Henry Sidney's last tenure of the office of Lord Deputy had closed in 1578, and for the next few years the Desmond rebellion perforce put a stop to the work he had set himself to accomplish. It was not until the southern rising had been crushed that Sir John Perrot, who, in 1584, succeeded to the Irish Govem- ' See Hore and Graves's Social State of the Sotcth- Eastern Counties in tlie Sixteenth Century, p. 27. "- Sloane MS. 2200 Brit. Mus. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 127 ment, was able to resume the work. Though this statesman is best remembered in our history in connection with the composition of Connaught, which was effected during his administration, it is in relation to Ulster that his proceedings have most interest in the present connection. To Perrot belongs the honour of having divided the northern province into divisions substantially corresponding to its modern counties, though twenty years were to elapse before these divisions were generally recognised, or before they became effective portions of the administrative machinery of the country. The story of the Anglo-Norman colonies of Ulster and the settlements of Lecale, the Ards, and Carrickfergus, has never been fully analysed, and to tell it is outside our present purpose.^ Here it must suffice to observe that the only counties in the modern sense of the term which can be recognised as existing in Ulster before the time of Elizabeth were Louth, which, as already noted, was anciently accounted part of that province, and the counties of Antrim and Down. The precise date at which the two last were constituted is unknown ; but it appears by the ' Black Book of Christ Church ' that they, or at least certain districts bearing these names, had existed prior to the reign of Edward II. From that time down to the settlement in Antrim of the McDon- nells of the Isles, under Henry VIII., little is known of them ; but the two counties had been recognised as settled districts by Perrot's time, and as such were distinguished by that Deputy from the ' unreformed ' parts of Ulster. In 1575 Sir Henry Sidney had made a journey to Ulster with a view to dividing the province into shires, but had failed to effect anything — an effort which was referred to by Sir John Davies in his address as Speaker of the Irish Parliament in 1613 ; when, congratulating the Commons on the complete- ness of its representation, he observed, ' How glad would Sir Henry Sidney have been to see this day, he that so much desired to reform Ulster, but never could perfectly perform it,' ' A good deal of information on this topic is given in a series of papers by Kev. A. Hume in the Ulster Journal of Arcliccology vol. i. 128 ILLUSTKATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY Perrot's contribution to the shiring of Ulster was little more than a settlement on paper of the boundaries of the new counties he desired to create. It is best described in the language of Sir John Davies : — * After him [Sidney] Sir John Perrot . . . reduced the unreformed parts of Ulster into seven shires, namely, Armagh, Monaghan, Tjrrone, Coleraine, Donegal, Fermanagh, and Cavan, though in his time the law was never executed in these new counties by any Sheriff or Justices of Assize ; but the people left to be ruled still by their own barbarous lords and laws.' Perrot's work was of course interrupted, and for the time rendered nugatory, by the rising of Hugh O'Neill ; but it was so far effective that his division became the basis of the subsequent allocation of the northern territories, which, a few years later, followed the Flight of the Earls and the Plantation of Ulster. Had affairs in England permitted the Government to give steady and continuoiis attention to the government of Ireland, it is probable that the work initiated by Sussex and Sidney, and so largely extended by Sir John Perrot, would have been completed before the close of Elizabeth's reign. But Perrot was recalled in disgrace in 1588, and the business of shiring Ireland was arrested for nearly twenty years. With O'Neill taking full advantage of the difficulties in which England was involved by the struggle with Spain, and asserting his power effectively throughout Ulster, the subdivision of the northern province remained purely nominal. Even in the more settled districts much con- fusion reigned. The result is seen in the discrepancies which appear between the various accounts which remain to us of the division of Ireland at this time. These exhibit consider- able confusion, not only as to the counties of which each province was made up, but even as to the provinces them- selves. Thus Haynes, in his ' Description of Ireland,' ^ in 1598, states that Ireland is divided into five parts. He includes Meath among the provinces, mentioning it as con- taining four counties, viz. East Meath, Westmeath, Long- ' See Haynes's Description of Ireland in 1598. Edited by Kev. Edmund Haynes, S.J., F.R.U.I. THE COUNTIES OF IKELAND 129 ford, and Cavan, though he adds that the last is by some ' esteemed part of Ulster.' On the other hand, in a survey printed in the ' Carew Calendar,' ^ revised to the year 1602, Longford is included in Connaught, while Cavan is not mentioned, and the completeness of the relapse of Ulster from ' civility ' is shown by the description of that province as containing three counties and four ' Seignories.' Thus it was not until after the accession of James I., in the time of Sir Arthur Chichester, that, in the words of Sir John Davies, ' the whole realm being divided into shires, every bordering territory whereof doubt was made in what county the same should lie was added or reduced to a county certain.' The boundaries of the counties forming the provinces of Connaught and Ulster were ascertained one after another by a series of Inquisitions between the years 1606 and 1610, which confirmed in the main the arrange- ments tentatively made by Perrot, though in the case of Ulster these were necessarily varied in some important respects, particularly as regards Londonderry, by the changes resulting from the Flight of the Earls and the Plantation of the northern province. The enumeration of counties and provinces in Speed's ' Description of the Kingdom of Ireland,' in 1610, shows, as already noted, that in that year the precise allocation of counties among the provinces still remained vague and indeterminate in the popular estimation. But Meath had by that time disappeared from the list of provinces ; and though some years were to elapse ere all the counties could be finally delimited, this process had been practically completed when Sir John Davies finally left Ireland in 1619, except in the case of Tipperary, where the exceptional conditions created by the existence of the Ormond palatinate long retarded the final settle- ment. Although Munster is of all the great divisions that which, if compared with the original distribution imputed to King John, shows the least alteration in its county system, the southern province has not been without its vicissitudes ' Carew Cal. iv. pp. 44ti-54. K 130 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY in this respect. In Perrot's time Munster consisted of as many as eight counties, and the final settlement of the six counties now embraced in it was, in fact, delayed until after the other provinces had assumed their present form. The shiring of Munster was effected chiefly through the instru- mentality of the provincial administration known as the Presidency of Munster, which was established by Sidney in 1570. No single act of Elizabethan policy had more impor- tant or more satisfactory results than the institution of the Presidencies of Munster and Connaught ; and as the gradual demarcation of the counties of both provinces as they now exist was largely effected by their means, it seems desirable to give a brief account of an institution which was devised by Sidney, as Davies puts it, ' to inure and acquaint the people of Munster and Connaught again with English Government.' The first idea of these instruments of administration was formed in the time of Edward VI., when a scheme was devised for the appointment of separate Presidents for each of the three provinces of Munster, Connaught, and Ulster. But although Sussex had a clearly defined scheme for giving effect to this policy, it was not until Sir Henry Sidney's first administration that, in 1565, definite shape was given to it, or that the constitution of what for the next century were known as the Presidency Courts of Connaught and Munster was formally drafted. The Presidency included not only a President answerable to the Lord Deputy, but a Council composed of prelates and nobles of the province, and a Chief Justice with two Justices and an Attorney-General, together with a Treasurer, Clerk of the Council, and other adminis- trative officers. In 1568 Sir John Pollard was nominated first President of Munster, and in the year following Sir Edward Fitton became President of Connaught. No President was appointed for Ulster, the charge of which was confided, under a temporary Commission, to a marshal : an officer whose duties were half civil, half military. Pollard, however, never entered on his government, and the first acting President of Munster was Sir John Perrot, who. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 131 appointed in 1570, was for six years a strenuous representa- tive of the Crown in that province.^ It is a matter for great regret that the records of these Presidencies have long since perished.'^ They seem to have been lost in the troubled times succeeding the rebellion of 1641, and the presidential institution itself did not long survive that cataclysm. Though they lingered beyond the Restoration, the Presidencies were not regarded by the Duke of Ormond as necessary or efficient instruments of govern- ment ; and in 1672, during the viceroyalty of Lord Essex, they were finally abolished. But though the presidential system was not destined to remain a permanent feature in the administrative systeni of Ireland, its operation during the years first following its institution was unquestionably effective. In Perrot's hands, both as President of Munster, and later when as Deputy that statesman became responsible for the whole country, it was largely utilised to effect what was practically a fresh delimitation of the old counties of Munster. In an old ' note,' probably dating back to the fif- teenth century, quoted by Perrot in his Report to Elizabeth, already cited, the Munster counties are thus enumerated : ' The following is the succession of the Presidents of Munster and Connaught respectively, as given in Liber Munerum Hibernicc : — Presidents of Munster : 1568, Sir John Pollard (never acted) ; 1570, Sir John Perrot ; 1576, Sir William Drury ; 1579, Thomas, 10th Earl of Ormond ; 1584, Sir John Norris ; 1597, Sir Thos. Norris ; 1600, Sir George Carew ; 1603, Sir Henry Brouncker ; 1607, Henry, Lord Danvers ; 1614, Donatus, Earl of Thomond; 1625, Sir Edward Villiers ; 1627, Sir William St. Leger ; 1643, Jerome, Earl of Portland ; 1660, Roger, Earl of Orrery. Presidents of Connauglit : 1569, Sir Edward Fitton ; 1579, Sir Nicholas Malby ; 1584, Sir Richard Bingham ; 1597, Sir Conyers Clifford ; 1604, Richard, Earl of Clanricarde; 1616, Sir Charles Wilmott; 1630, Charles, Viscount Wilmott, and Roger, Viscount Ranelagh ; 1644, Thomas, Viscount Dillon, and Henry, Viscount Vv^ilmott ; 1645, Sir Charles Coote, Earl of Mountrath ; 1661, John, Lord Berkeley of Stratton ; 1665, John, Lord Berkeley, and John, Lord Kingston. Both Presidencies were abolished in 1672. - See Prendergast's Introduction to Cal. S. P. Ireland, James I., 1606-8. pp. xx-xxxv. A volume called The Council Book of Munster survives in the Harleian Collection at the British Museum (Harl. Coll. No. 697) ; but it only extends from 1601 to 1617. The Instructions of the Deputy and Council to Sir George Carew as President of Munster in 1599-1600 will be found in Pacata Hibernia, p. 6 et seg. The Instructions for 1615 have been printed in Desiderata Ciiriosa Hibernica, ii. p. 1. k2 132 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY * In Munster there be five English shires — Cork,' Limerick, Waterford, Kerry, Tipperary; and three Irish shires — Desmond, Ormond, and Thomond.' It will be noted that the five former of these comities, with Thomond or Clare, nominally make up the modern province of Munster. Ormond represents Tipperary, less the county of Cross Tipperary, and as such still possesses a well-defined meaning. Desmond is a district perhaps less clearly defined in the popular mind. It embraced a large portion of East Kerry and West Cork, and at one time was actually erected into a separate county. In 1571 a Commission issued to Sir John Perrot and others, under the Statute 11 Elizabeth,^ for the counties of Waterford, Tipperary, Cork, Limerick, and Kerry, and the countries of Desmond, Bantry, and Carbery, and all countries south of the Shannon in Munster, to make the country of Desmond one county, and to divide the rest into such counties as may be convenient. As a result of this Commission, Desmond became and was long regarded as a distinct county, and its boundaries appear from an Inquisition of 1606. But though Fynes Moryson places Desmond on the list of the Munster counties, stating it to have been lately added, its separate identity is not invariably recognised, though for a time it boasted that essential note of independence, a separate sheriff. This, however, had disappeared before the close of Elizabeth's reign, for Haynes writes in his account of Cork that that county,^ ' being the greatest in the realm, have been tolerated to have two sheriffs — the one particular in Desmond, the other in the rest of the county — and this without any ground of law, but by discretion of the L. Deputies ; the inconvenience thereof being espied, it had been of late thought good that one ' It appears from a document among the Carte Papers that as late as 1606 a proposal was entertained at the instance of the people of Youghal to divide the county of Cork into separate shires, owing to the impossibility of including so large a territory in the bailiwick of a single sheriff. An Order in Council to this effect seems actually to have been made, the eastern district being designated the county of Youghal, with Youghal as its county town. — Carte Papers, Ixi. p. 337. - Fiant, Eliz. No. 1486, Irish Record Office. ^ S'/ie DascripLioii of Ireland in 159b, ed. by liev. Edmund Hogan, S. J., p. 169 . THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 133 sheriff should be for Kerry and Desmond, and so two sheriffs in one county against law taken away.' The amalgamation with Kerry appears to have been completed by 1606,^ when Mr. Justice Walshe, in describing to Salisbury the Munster Circuit of that year, mentions particularly the successful union of Desmond and Kerry. The dual representation of Tipperary in the list of Irish counties was long a puzzle to antiquaries, and even an inquirer so diligent and in general so accurate as Sir John Davies was misinformed on the subject, notwithstanding the minute inquiries he appears to have instituted into the origin of what struck him as a curious administrative anomaly. ' At Cashel,' he writes in his account of the Munster Circuit of 1606,^ ' we held the Sessions for the County of the Cross. It hath been anciently called " the Cross " (for it had been a county above 300 years ; and was, indeed, one of the first that ever was made in this kingdom) because all the lands within the precincts thereof were either the demesnes of the Archbishop of Cashel, or holden of that See, or else belonging to Abbeys or houses of religion, and so the land as it were dedicated to the Cross of Christ. The scope or latitude of this county, though it were never great, yet now is drawn into so narrow a compass that it doth not deserve the name of shire.' Davies' confusion as to the two counties of Tipperary, which continued to be separately represented in the Irish House of Commons down to Strafford's Parliament of 1634, was extremely natural in view of the limited information available when he thus accounted for the anomalous existence of the county of Cross Tipperary. But, in fact, the duplica- tion had really originated in the palatine system. To the accident which preserved Tipperary as the last of the pala- tinates was due the survival of Cross Tipperary as the last of the counties of the Cross. The county palatine of Tipperary was originally created by letters patent, granted in 1328 by Edward III. to James le Botiller, Earl of Ormond, and * Cal. S. Papers (Ireland), 1603-6, p. 573. See AppendixIII. to this paper, p. 141 infra. - Ibid. 1606-8. 134 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY confirmed by successive monarchs to that nobleman's suc- cessors in the honours of the Butler family. The jurisdic- tion thus granted embraced the whole county of Tipperary, with the exception of certain Church lands, which constituted, as was usual with Church land in palatine comities, a distinct shrievalty under the ordinary jurisdiction of the King's Courts. In addition to these districts of the Cross, there was also excepted from the palatine grant the district of Dough Arra, or MacBrien's country, adjacent to Killaloe, which, long a debatable land on the borders of the three counties of Clare, Limerick, and Tipperary, was in 1606 joined by Chichester to the county of the Cross of Tipperary. In 1621, during the wardship of the daughter and heiress of Thomas, tenth Earl of Ormond, the palatinate of Tipperary was seized into the Crown by James I. But the county of the Cross apparently remained unaffected by this exertion of the royal prerogative, and, as already noted, it was represented in the Parliament of 1634, though the county proper appears to have returned no members to that assembly. The palatinate remained in abeyance for a period of forty years, till, after the Eestoration, it was reconstituted by Charles II. in 1664, in favour of the first Duke of Ormond. The grant on this occasion included both the old territory of the Cross, which never thereafter returned members to Parliament, and the district of Dough Arra, formerly excepted from the palatine county.^ The liberties and royalties of the whole county of Tipperary were enjoyed by the Butlers until the attainder in 1715 of the second Duke put an end to the last Irish example of these great mediseval jurisdictions.- The Statute '2nd George I., cap. 8, ' An Act for extinguishing the royalties and liberties of the County of Tipperary,' by its second section enacted, ' that whatsoever hath been deno- minated or called Tipperary or Cross Tipperary, shall hence- forth be and remain one county for ever, under the name of the County of Tipperary.' ' See p. 142, infra. 2 See 5//; Report of the Deputy Keeper nf Public Records of Ireland, p. 7, and Appendix III. pp. 33-38. THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 135 APPENDIX I THE NOMENCLATURE OF THE IRISH COUNTIES. It may, perhaps, be justly expected that in any attempt to sketch the origin of the Irish counties some explanation of their names should be given. The nomenclature of the counties has nowhere been made the subject of a specific inquiry, nor is it certain that the derivations commonly accepted are in all cases accurate. But though the subject is not one of which the writer can treat with independent knowledge, it may be convenient to give the derivations as stated by Dr. P. W. Joyce in Irish Names of Places. In the case of those counties which are not mentioned expressly in that well-known work, I am indebted to Dr. Joyce's learning and kindness for the means of making the list here given complete, or nearly so. In several instances, as Mayo and Down, in which the name is derived from a word indicating a natural feature which is not characteristic of the general aspect of the county to which it has been applied, the discrepancy is due to the county being named from a town within its borders. In such cases the term will be found fairly descriptive of the town or its neighbourhood, though not of the county at large. Unless where otherwise stated, the references given in brackets in this list are to Joyce's Irish Names of Places. Name of County Irish Equivalent Meaning Antrim ' Aontruibh — Armagh Ard-Macha (i. 77) . Macha's height Carlow . Cetherloch or Catherlough Quadruple lake (i. 448) Cavan . Cabhan (i. 401) A hollow Clare . Clar(i. 427) . A board : figuratively, a flat piece of land Cork . Corcaeh (i. 462) A march Donegal Dun-na-nGall (i. 97-8) . The fort of the foreigners Down ■^ Dun (i. 280) . A fortress Dublin ••' Duibh-linn (i. 363) Black pool Fermanagh . Fii-Monach (i. 131) The men of Monach Galway G a i 1 1 e a m h (Wilde's The daughter of Breasil, king Lough Cmrib, p. 12) of the Firbolgs ' Dr. Joyce declines to commit himself as to the derivation of Antrim. Dubourdieu following the editor of Ware says ' the name is said to have been Andruim or Endruira — that is, the habitation of the waters, from its being almost insulated by sea and lake. ■•' The name was applied at first only to the county town of Downpatrick, and the name originates, of course, in the dim near the cathedral of that town. ^ See also Haliday's Scandinavian Kingdom of Dublin, p. 23. 136 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Name of County Kerry . Kildare Kilkenny King's County Leitrim Limerick ' . Londonderry - Longford Louth . Mayo . Meath ^ Monaghan . Queen's County Eoscommon . Sligo* . Tipperary Tyrone . Waterford Wexford Wicklow Irish Equivalent Ciarraide (i. 127) . Cill-dara (i. 115) . Cill-Cainneach See p. 119 supra Liath-dhruim (i. 525) A eoiTupted form of Luimneach (i. 49) Deny Longphort (i. 300) Lughmhagh . Magh-eo (i. 510) Meidhe . Muinechan See p. 119 sup^'a Ros-coman Sligeach Tobar or Tiobraid-Araun {i. 453) Tir-Eoghain . Meaning The race of Ciar The church of the oak The church of St. Canice Grey ridge A barren spot of land Oak wood A fortress or encampment Lug (?) Magh = a plain The plain of the yews A neck A little shrubbery The Wood of St. Coman River The Well of Ara The territory of Owen In the case of these three counties the names given by the Danes to their towns have completely superseded the ancient Irish designations of the adjacent districts. APPENDIX II THE ENGLISH PALE IN 1596.^ A Perambulation of Leinster, Meath and Louth, of which consist the English Pale (1596). I. County op Dublin. The Barony of Cowlock lyeth North & by East from Dublin. . . The Barony of Bah'oddry lyeth North from Dublin ... ' As applied to the fair and fertile lands of Limerick, this derivation seems singularly unhappy. Its original application was, however, confined to a portion of the estuary of the Shannon. See also Joyce's Social History of Ancient Ireland, ii. p. 194. '^ Prior to the plantation of Ulster, Londonderry was known as Derry Columbkille, from the Monastery of St. Columba. In pagan times it was called Derry -Calgach, or the Oakwood of Calgeaeh, or fierce warrior. ■* According to Dr. Joyce, the province of Meath was so called from being formed by cutting a meidhe, or neck, from each of the other provinces. The four pieces met at Aiall-na-Meeran, or the Stone of the Divisions, at Ushnagh in CO. Westmeath. See Joyce's Child's History of Ireland, p. 58. * The name was originally applied to the river at Sligo. ^ The date is supplied by Carew himself in the margin of the original in Carew MSS. vol. 600, p. 143. The dots represent the names of the principal residents in each barony, with their places of residence, which are given in the abstract of this document printed in Careio Cal. iii. pp. 188-9. The abstract does not give the particulars here printed. THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 137 The Barony of Castleknock lyeth North from Dublin .... The Barony of Newcastle lyeth South & by West from Dublin .... The Barony of Rathdown lyeth East South East from Dublin .... The Boundary of this Countie : — By East the Mayne Sea : By North part of the County of Meath & the Nanywater. By North West part of the Countie of Meath. By West & by South the Couutye of Kildare. By Sowth the Otooles Cuntry & the Glins. By Sowth East the Obirnes Cuntry. The River of Lythie coining downe thorowe the Cownty of Kildare falleth eastwaz'd into the Sea ij myles from Dublin. II. County of Wicklow. The Birns' & Tooles' Country w*'' the Glins that lie by Sowth & by East the County of Dublin was by Commission bownded owte into a Shire to be named & called the Cownty of Wicklowe & was divided into Baronies as foUoweth : The General Bowndes of the Cotmty. The same to begin to the North East where the River of Delgin falleth into the sea, w*^^ River divideth the Barony of Rathdown in the Countie of Dublin from the Birns Cuntrey, & so the Sea to be the eastern bordre unto the River of Arclo, w*^^ River of Ai'clo shalbe the Mear on the Sowthe syde, as it falleth unto the great moore or Bog called Caillimona or the narrow bog, & so including the territorie called Cosha, untill it come to Ballishon ats. Johnstowne, leaving the Cowntie of Catherlagh to the Sowthward to go direct unto a foorde upon the river of Slane called Ahridlas : from w'^^ ffoord the same River of Slane shalbe the Meire westward untill it passe to the landes of Rathbranne, addioiiing to the sayde River, w'^*^ Towne & landes of Rath- branne w*^ the Towne & landes of Tenoran, Rathtoole, Griflfins- towne & so muche of Colvinstowne as is nowe supposed of the County of Dublin, & also the Townes & landes of Rathsallagh & Whitstowne & the bowndes to the North Westward untill it come to Aghcarrigord : from whence leaving suche of the Lo : Arch-bisshop of Dublin's landes as beareth w*^ the Barony of Newcastle to the Northward to passe unto the foorde called 138 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY Anacassan & so compassing in Eussells Towne and the landes of the Burbage to passe unto the crosse of Ballycomyn : from whence leaving that part of the Bishops lands w"*" beareth w*^** the Barony of Nuecastle, as is also aforesayde, w'^^ the parishe of Ballimoore, & the Countie of Kildare to the Northward, The way w*^^ leadeth from thence eastwarde, & divideth the Barony of Nuecastle from the Cowillagh unto Agherillin to be the mear or boundes, and so from thence as the Barony of Rathdown passeth unto Kilmasanton, from whence passing over the mountaignes Eastward and towardes the Sowth, & leaving Farollin and Glancapp to the Northwardes, the Eiver of Delgin that falleth from thence to be the meare to the Sea, as first above sayde, W^ conteyneth in length abowte xxij myles & in breadth xx myles. The speciall houndes of it divided into vj severall Baronies. Nuecastell Maghenegmi. — So muche of the Birnes Cuntrey as lyeth betwixt the water of Delgin & Barnesketh in length from North to the Sowth, and so from the Sea on the East to the Fertrye on the West conteyning abowt x myles in length & iiij myles in breadth, to be called the Baronny of Nuecastle Maghenegan. Inishboghin.— The Birnes Cuntry from Barneskeagh unto Toerulcomyn & from thence to the water of Avilo in length from the North to the Sowth leaving Colrenell to the west & the sea to be East bordre contayning xij myles in length & iiij myles in breadth to be named the Barony of Inishboghin. Ballinicor. — Colranell & as muche of Cossha as is w^^in the generall mean streching westwarde to the landes of the Toreboy in length from the Northwarde to the Southwarde having the Birnes Cuntry on the East & Omaly on the West conteining in length viij myles & in bredth vij myles to be called the Barony of Ballinicore. Talhots-Towne.—1h& Torboy Omayle & as muche landes as is compassed w4n the river of Slane from Aghridlas to Roods towne conteynig in length abowt vj myles & in breadth iiij myles to be named the Barony of Talbots-town. Holywood. — From the landes of Roodestowne, the townes & landes of Rathbrane, Rathtoola, Tenoran, Griffiths-towne & as muche of Colvinstowne as was supposed to be of the Countie of Dublin, Rathsallagh, Trenistowne, Bally hooke, Marga, Etterely, Whitstowne, Dowarde, Hollywood, the parish of Boystowne, the Ladin, Kiltagaruln, Russelstowne, Burge the three-Castles Kil- THE COUNTIES OF lEELAND 139 bryde, & the Brittas contayning xij myles in length & iij myles in bredth to be the Barony of Hollywood. Castle Kevin. — The territories called the Fertrye & Salkye vij myles long and iiij myles broad to be called the Barony of Castle Kevyn. The County of Wexfoede. The River of Slane roons from the west to the east pr rath"" from the north west to the Sowth east, dividing the whole Cuntry in a maner in the raidest, & hathe the Towne of Wexford situat at the mowth of it hard by the Sea : That Towne lyeth from Dublin Sowth sowth west & is distant from it Ix myles : viz. : from Dublin to Nuecastle-Mageneghan xviij myles : thence to Arclo the Erl of Ormondes Mano"" & Castle xviij more & so to Wexforde by Glascarrike along the Sea xxiiij. This Countie is bounden by east w'^ the sea: By Sowth & Sowth West w' the Cownty of Waterforde : By West w'^ the Cownty of Kilkenny : By Northwest w*^ the Countie of Catherlagh the river of the Barrowe dividing of them : And by north w*^ Cownty of Wicklo or the Cuntreys before specified whereof that County should have been made. The County of Kilkenny. It is bounded : East the Cowntie of Wexforde. Southeast & Sowth the County of Watei-forde. West the Cownty of the Crosse of Tipperary : Northwest up4) Ossory : North Leix or the Queen's Cownty & Idough. North east the Cavenaghes of Idron in the Cow^nty of Catherlagh. The Towne (? County) op Carlo als. Catherlagh. From Dublin to the Naas xij myles To KilcuUen v "i xxxij to Castles Dermood x to Catherlogh v all west j myles. It is bounded : By East the Cownty of Kildare. By Sowth East the Mountaignes of Kildare. By Sowth the County of Wexforde. By Sowth east the Cavenaghs. By Sowth west the Cownty of Kilkenny. By West the Queenes Cownty in the furth"" syde the Barrowe. By North part of the Queens Cov/uty & of the County of Kildare. 140 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY The County of Kildare. The bowiides. On the East the Cownty. On the Sowth east the marches of the Cownty of Dubhn. On the Sowth the Otooles & County of Catheiiagh. On the Sowth by west the Q : Cownty ; on the west the King's Cownty. On the North & northwest the Countye of Meath. The Queens Cownty aIs. Leyx. The Botondes. By East : the Cownty of Keldare & the river of the Barrowe. By North : The King's Cownty als. Offally ; & Odoynes Cuntrye. By West : The Lo : of Upper ossories Cuntry ; By Sowth : Idough part of the Cownty of Kilkenny. .... Pi'om Mariburgh to Catherlagh Castle whereof Harpoole is Constable & w'^'^ lyeth from Mariboi^ough Sowth by East circa xiiij myles. The Queens Cownty is in length xxij myles. In breadth from the Barrowe east, to the water of Neon west. xij myles. The Kings Cownty als. Offaly. The Boundes. By East the County of Kildare. By Southest the Eiver of the Barrowe. By Sowthe the Queens Cownty. By Sowthwest Odoynes Cuntry. By West the Shennon. By northwest the Cownty of Westmeath. By North & by northeast the Cownty of Meath. The Boundes of Westmeath. By east the County of Meath. By Sowtheast, a nook of the Cownty of Kildare. By Sowth the Kings Cownty ais Offaly. By Southwest part of Maroghlands Cuntry & the Shennon. By West, the Shennon & Athloan, where Conaghe begins. By West, & by North, the Cownty of Longford ats the Annly. By North the Cownty of Cavan ais the Brenny. By Northeast part of the Cavan & part of Meath. The Boundes of Meath. By East the Cownty of Dublin. By North the river of the Slann ^t of the Cownty of Lowth & the Brenny. By north east part or a nooke of Dublin. By West the Cownty of West Meath. By northwest the Brenny. By Sowth & south west part of the Kings Cownty. By Sowth & Sowtheast the Cownty of Kildare. THE COUNTIES OF IRELAND 14] The Bounds of Loioth. By east the Sea. By Sowth the Cownty of Meath. By West part of the Brenny. By Northwest Farney and Clancarvile. By North the fues k O hanlons Cuntry. APPENDIX III REPORT BY MR. JUSTICE WALSHE ' TO THE EARL OF SALISBURY, ON HIS CIRCUIT IN MUNSTER IN 1606. Justice Walshc to the Earl of Salisbury. Eight honourahle my humble duty premised. I am obliged (by my promise last in my letters sent to your lordship in July last) to certify your lordship of the success of the last circuit in Munster, wherein the third baron of the Exchequer and myself were em- ployed. Our beginning was at Cork, where some sharp executions hath been of relievers of the late slain rebel Maurice McGibbon, of the White Knights' country. Thence we passed into Kerry, where no sessions were holden this last seven years. And although that county be yet unpeopled and poor, yet we found by their frequent resort unto us that they thirsted much after justice. We have there by special commission united Desmond, a wild Irish country, unto the county of Kerry. The Lord President did forbear to go to that county, because (as his lordship said) he feared there would not be sufficient victuals to be had there. All the churches in that county are ruined and uncovered ; and therefore a great part of our care was to procure the re-edifying of them ; and I fear it will not be effected very suddenly because there are but few hands that can give help thereunto. Thence we passed over the river of Shannon to the county of Clare and sat at Innis (Ennis), ' Sir Nicholas Walshe had a distinguished judicial career. In a letter of the Irish Privy Council in 1606 he is described as ' one who hath with good credit and sufficiency very faithfully & painfully served in office here above thirty years.'— CaZ. S. P. (Ireland), 1603-6, p. 484. He had held the office of Chief Justice of Munster prior to 1584, when he was appointed second Justice of the King's Bench. In 1597 he was promoted to the Chief Justiceship of the Common Pleas, in succession to Sir Robert Dillon, and he held this post until his death in 1615, when he was succeeded by Sir Dominick Sarsfield. In 1587 Walshe was sworn of the Irish Privy Council. The letters patent authorising his admission to this honour testify to the high opinion entertained of him. See Smyth's Law Officers of Ireland, p. 102. The report here printed inextenso is very briefly summarised in Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1603-6, p. 573. 142 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY where we found that country far better inhabited, and we cannot but attribute the chief cause thereof to the Earl of Thomond, who hath well defended the inhabitants of that county from the rage of rebels in the war time and from foreign thieves since the re- bellion ended. And assuredly there is not much stealing among themselves. We saw two bridges newly erected there, the one betwixt the Shannon and Clare, the other betwixt Bunratty and Limerick. When we came to Limerick we met with the Lord President, where sharp punishment was inflicted upon relievers of rebels, which I assure myself will be for a long time to their good remembered in that county. From thence our remove was to the Gross of Tipperary, and at Cashel some few but special offenders were executed. And there also we have by special commission united the country of Arra, or McBrien Arra's country, to the said county, because the Cross is a very small county, and the other was wont to be a receptacle of offenders obeying the officers of no county. And lastly we ended at Clonmel, for the exempted points of the liberties of Tipperary, where some six notable offenders were executed for treason, viz., murder of malice prepense, which is in this land made treason, and for the procurement and relieving of murderers. In all these counties we have by ordinary course of law indicted most of the townsmen for not coming to their parish churches in service time, according to the statute made in 2 Eliz., which course is far less irksome to the people than to draw them in by mandate or other means consisting upon the King's mere prerogative. Before this circuit began I was specially charged to deliver a great gaol at Kilkenny, and after the end of our circuit at Munster I came to Sir James Ley and to Sir John Davies to Waterford, betwixt whom and the Mayor of that city there was some difference for their sittings as Justices of the county of the city of Waterford, and I gave some help to appease their variance by joining with them in assistance of the Mayor and sheriffs to inquire of recusancies, and by an inquest of citizens had the greatest part of the inhabitants indicted, which was the thing they desired most to effect, and thus having summarily related our travel in Munster, etc., I humbly take leave. From Waterford, this 18th of September, 1606. Your honourable lordship's most humbly at commandment, Nicholas Walshe. Endorsed : To the right Honourable my singular good lord the Earl of Salisbury, these, &c. V THE WOODS OF IRELAND That the climate and soil of Ireland are naturally suited to the growth of timber of nearly every useful kind indigenous to Europe, and that the island was anciently stored with woods and forests of vast extent, is proved not only by the testimony of all who have considered its physical and geological formation, but by the express statement of his- torians and chroniclers, and the convincing implication of our topographical nomenclature. The woods of Ireland, and especially those formerly adjacent to our capital, were famous even before the coming of the English. It was from the fair green of Oxmantown, once covered with woods that extended westward over the whole of what is now the Phoenix Park, that William Rufus drew the timber for the roof of Westminster Hall, where, as the chronicle of Dr. Hanmer has it, ' no English spider webbeth or breedeth to this day.' ^ And, as tradition avers, it was from Cullens- wood that, only a generation after the coming of the Normans, the Byrnes and Tooles made the descent upon the Bristol- men who had settled in Dublin for which Easter Monday was long had in remembrance in Dublin as * Black Monday.' "^ Giraldus Cambrensis states in his ' Topographia Hiber- nica ' that the woodlands of Ireland exceeded in his day the plains or cleared and open land. And not even the zealous ' ' Meredith Hanmer's Chronicle,' Ancient Irish Histories, ii. p. 194. The practice of using Irish timber for buildings intended to be durable seems to have been usual in England in early times. The spire of the thirteenth century bell- tower of Worcester Cathedral, taken down in 1647, was of ' massive timber, Irish and unsawed.' — Journal of Kilkenny, Archaeological Society, 1856-7, p. 236. - ' Meredith Hanmer's Chronicle,' Ancient Irish Histories, ii. p. 370. 144 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY fervour of the author of ' Cambrensis Eversus ' has seriously endeavoured to refute this assertion of our earliest descriptive chronicler.' Anyone who looks into Dr. Joyce's suggestive book on Irish names of places will be astonished to note the extent to which the root words expressive of woods, forests, and trees are found in the names of hills and valleys, town- lands, and districts which are now bare of every vestige of the abundant timber of which these names have long been the only memory. For example : — The barony of Kilmore, near Charleville, gets its name from the great wood which in the sixteenth century formed, as the * Pacata Hibernia ' tells us, one of the strongest barriers against the soldiers of Elizabeth. Dr. Joyce has calculated that in at least seven hundred cases the ' kils ' and ' kills ' so numerous in the place names of Ireland really represent the word ' coill,' and are wit- nesses to woods no longer visible ; while ' coillte,' the plural, and ' coillin,' the diminutive of ' coill,' account for many more. * Fidh,' or fioth [fih], another term for wood, also occurs fre- quently, and the two baronies of Armagh, called the Fews, are of this origin. * Eos,' too, occasionally stands for wood, as in the Abbey of Kosserk in Mayo, Eoscrea, New Eoss, and best known of all, Eoscommon. 'Fasach ' (faussagh), a wilderness, ' Scairt ' (scart), a thicket of scrub, and ' Muine ' (munny), a shrubbery, are a few among many arboreal terms which abound in the i7idejo. locorum, and contribute to justify the term ' Inis-na-veevy,' or woody island, which is among the bardic names of Ireland. Over and above the terms signify- ing woods, are those which denote particular trees, of which Daire (Derry), an oakwood, with its many variations, is the most important.- The * Annals of the Four Masters ' abound in references to the ancient woods of Ireland, which prove that in a great part of the country a dominant charac- teristic of the social system of ancient Ireland was the forest life of the people. And if we may accept as accurate a passage in the ' Annals of Ulster,' for the year 835 A.D.,^ the ' Celtic Society's Edition, ii. jj. 110. - Joyce's Irish Names of Places, i. pp. 491-522. 3 Ibul i. p. 337. THE WOODS OF IRELAND 145 acorn and nut crop was so large in that year as to close up the streams, so that they ceased to flow in their usual course. That this state of things survived to an era well within historical memory is abundantly demonstrated by many authorities. Sir John Davies, a writer whose observations and conclusions, even when we disagree with them, are always suggestive, has noted the degree in which the politi- cal system adopted by the Norman colonists of Ireland, and pursued, whether by choice or necessity, by the English Government for many centuries, had the effect of preserving this feature. That system was to drive the native popula- tion from the plains to the woods ; with the result that the Irish territories tended to become ever more and more a succession of forest fastnesses. Had a different plan been adopted, the woods, as Davies points out, would have been wasted by English habitations, as had happened just before his own time in the territories of Leix and Offaly, round the new-made forts of Maryborough and Philipstown. The early Plantagenets made some attempt to establish the forest laws in Ireland. In the neighbourhood of Dublin, at all events, a considerable tract must have been brought within their operations, for in 1229 Henry III. granted permission to Luke, Archbishop of Dublin, to carry out the disafforesting of certain lands formerly belonging to the see of Glendalough. It is certain that a royal forest was formed at Glencree, in the county Wicklow. In 1244 sixty does and twenty bucks were ordered to be ' taken alive in the king's parks nearest to the port of Chester to be sent to the port of Dalkey, Ireland, and delivered to the king's Treasurer of Dublin to stock the king's Park of Glencry ' ; and that the King's lands were not limited to a mere park, but included a forest properly so called, may be inferred from the language of a mandate of Edward I. permitting William Burnel, constable of the Castle of Dubhn, ' to have in the king's forest of Glencry twelve oak trees fit for timber of the king's gift to construct his house of Glenecapyn.' ^ ' Cal. S. P. (Ireland), 1171-1251, p. 398. 2 Ibid. 1285-92, p. 281. 146 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY A reference to the misconduct of the Abbot and monks of St. Mary's, Dublin, in hunting in the King's forest without license supports the same conclusion.* But the royal forest of Glencree disappears from view, like so much else, amid the confusion that followed the wars of the Bruces. No mention of it is to be found subsequent to the reign of Edward I. The whole district comprised in the modern county of Wicklow relapsed after the Bruce disturbance into the con- trol of the Irish septs of the Byrnes and Tooles ; nor w^as it effectively redeemed by the Crown until the opening of the seventeenth century.^ Apart, however, from this formation of the royal forest of Glencree, no attempt was made for above three centuries after the arrival of the English in Ireland to encroach to any serious extent upon the native reserves of the Irish inhabitants, though a Statute of Edward I., passed in 1296, contained a clause which was designed to pro- vide highways through the country.^ But the wars of the Bruces which followed within a few years of this enactment, and the subsequent decadence of English power, prevented the taking of any effective steps under this Statute. Down to the middle of the sixteenth century, it may fairly be said, no substantial alteration took place in the face of Ireland in this regard. In Chief Justice Finglas's ' Breviate of the Getting of Ireland and of the Decay of the Same,' written about 1529, occurs a passage which shows that well on into the reign of Henry VIII., the period, indeed, at which the English Pale had shrunk to its narrowest limits, ' Chartulary of St. Mary's Abbey (Rolls Series), i. p. 4. * For an excellent account of the Forest of Glencree see a paper by Mr. T. P. Le Fanu, M.R.I.A., in the Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland for 1893, p. 268. ^ The clause ran as follows : ' The Irish enemy, by the density of the woods and the depths of the adjacent morasses, assume a confident boldness ; the King's highways are in places so overgrown with wood, and so thick and difficult, that even a foot passenger can hardly pass. Upon which it is ordained that every lord of a wood, with his tenants, through which the highway was anciently, shall clear a passage where the way ought to be, and remove all standing timber as well as underwood.' — Betham's Origin and History of the Constitution of England and of the Early Parliaments of Ireland. THE WOODS OF IRELAND 147 the districts in which EngHsh law remained supreme were everywhere hedged round by impassable forests. Finglas pre- scribed a remedy very similar to that enforced by Edward I., more than two centuries earlier : — ' Item — That the deputy be eight days in every summer cutting passes of the woods next adjoining to the king's subjects, which shall be thought most needful,' — and he enumerates above thirty passes, most of them adjacent to the Pale, which required to be made or maintained.^ The numerous writers to whom we owe our knowledge of Elizabethan Ireland and of the age immediately succeeding, concur in representing the great forests as having survived in most places to the middle of the sixteenth century, and in many till well into the seventeenth. 2 Sir Henry Piers, in his ' History of Westmeath,''^ designed to illustrate the Down Survey, speaks of that county as deficient m nothing, ' except only timber of bulk, with which it was anciently well stored.' Yet barely a century before this was written, Westmeath had been one of the most secure fortresses of * the king's Irish enemies,' as the native septs were called ; and it was for this reason that under Henry VIII. the county was ' The following are the names of the passes as given by Finglas : — ' The Passes names here ensueth, Downe, Callibre, the Newe Ditcli, the Passes to Powerscourt, Glankry, Ballamore in Foderth, going to Kearnes (or Ferns), Le Roge, Strenanloragh, Pollemounty, Branwallehangry, Morterston, two passes in Feemore in O'Morye's country, the passes of Ferneynobegane, Killemark, Kelly, Ballenower, Taghernefine, two passes in Reyraalagh, the passes going to Moill, two in Kalry, the passes of Bralion Juryne, Kilkorky, the Lagha and Ballatra, Karryconnell and Killaghmore, three passes in Oriore : one by Donegall, another by Faghert, and the third by Omere ; Ballaghkine, and Ballaghner.' — Harris's Hibernica, p. 51. It is not now possible to identify all the counties in which these passes were situate. - In Payne's Brief Description of Ireland, written in 1590, there occurs a passage illustrative of the agricultural value of the forests. ' I find by experi- ence,' wrote Payne, ' that a man may store 1,000 acres of woodland there (in Ireland) for '601. bestowed in draining, which being well husbanded, will yield more profit than so much like ground in England of 10s. the acre and 5001. stock, for in the Irish woodlands there is great store of very good pasture, and there mast doth not lightly fail ; there swine will feed very fat without any meat by hand.' — Payne's ' Brief Description of Ireland,' ed. Aquila Smith ; Tracts Relating to Ireland, i. p. 13. ^ Printed by Vallancey in 1774. L 2 148 ILLUSTKATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY severed from Meath to which it had ancieatlj^ belonged.^ During the wars of Elizabeth it was still a proverb that ' The Irish will never be tamed while the leaves are on the trees,' meaning that the winter was the only time in which the woods could be entered by an army with any hope of success ; and the system of ' plashing,' by which the forest paths were rendered impassable through the interlacing of the boughs of the great trees with the abundant underwood, was the obstacle accounted by most of Elizabeth's soldiers the most dangerous with which they were confronted. Derricke, in his ' Image of Ireland,' written in 1581, gives a description of the woods which, even if we discount the figures on the score of poetic licence, must be held to show that in his day the forests still covered enormous areas. He speaks of them as often twenty miles long."^ The adoption of a resolute policy in Ireland by the Tudor sovereigns was the first step towards the reduction of these immense woodland areas. The gradual extension throughout the country of the measures first applied to Westmeath led, under the reigns of Mary and Elizabeth, to a rapid clearance of large tracts of the country. Fynes Moryson, in the closing years of Elizabeth, found the central plain of Ireland nearly destitute of trees. ' I confess myself,' he writes, ' to have been deceived in the common fame that all Ireland is woody, having found in my long journey from Armagh to Kinsale few or no woods by the way, excepting the great woods of Ophalia : ^ and some low, shrubby places which they call glens."* The Pale had, of course, for centuries been denuded of its woods, if it ever ' By the Statute 34 Henry VIII. cap. i. ^ ' The woodes above and 'neath those hills, Some twentie miles in length : Round compacte with a shakynge bodye, A forte of passyng strength.' Derricke's Image of Ireland, Small's Edition, 1883, p. 28. ^ ' A porcon of the county of Ophaly is called Fergall, a place so stronge as nature could desire to make yt by wood and bogge, with which yt is environed.' — Dymmok's ' Treatise of Ireland in 1599 ' ; Tracts Relating to Ireland, ii. p. 43. ■* See also Part II. p. 228 infra. THE WOODS OF IRELAND 149 possessed them on a large scale, and as early as 1584 an ordinance of Henry VIII. had directed every husbandman to plant twelve ashes within the ditcher and closes of his farm. With the disappearance, in the person of Tyrone, of the last Irish chieftain powerful enough to hold independent sway in the island, this clearance was extended towards Ulster. By Strafford's time Wicklow, Wexford, and Carlow, and the Queen's County were the only districts in which the forests were still extensive. And even here they had begun to decline. Sir William Brereton noted in 1635 that in the neighbourhood of Carnew, in Sir Morgan Kavanagh's once thick woods, there remained 'little timber useful save to burn, and such as cumbreth the ground.' He adds that wood is ' a commodity which will be much wanting in this king- dom, and is now very dear at Dublin.' ^ The civil war which followed the Rebellion of 1641 doubtless tended largely in the same direction, and by the time of the Commonwealth Boate noted in his ' Natural History of Ireland ' that in some parts you might travel whole days without seeing any trees save a few about gentlemen's houses. This was especially so on the northern road, where for a distance of sixty miles from the capital not a wood worth speaking of was to be seen. ' For,' he adds, * the great woods which the maps do represent to us upon the mountains between Dundalk and the Newry are quite vanished, there being nothing left of them these many years since, but only one tree standing close by the highway, at the very top of one of the moun- tains, so as it may be seen a great way off, and therefore serveth travellers for a mark.' "^ The destruction of the woods, due in the first place to deliberate policy and in the next to the accidents of war, was accelerated both during the long peace that preceded the Rebellion, and afterwards in the years following the Restoration, by the progress of the arts of peace. The revival of Irish industries was nearly as fashionable a shibboleth in the middle of the sixteenth century as it has ' See Brereton's Travels, Part II. infra. - Boate's Ireland's Naturall Histcrry, chapter xv. 150 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY been at intervals in later ages. In those days the favourite objects of solicitude v^^ere the manufacture of pipe-staves, and the development of the iron-w^orks which were then supposed to be the true El Dorado of Irish enterprise — most people holding with Bacon that * Iron is a brave commodity where wood aboundeth.' Both industries depended for their success upon the woods, which were accordingly drawn upon regardless of the consequences. From Munster whole ship- loads of pipe-staves were exported, to the great profit of the proprietors and the great destruction of the woods ; and Boate says, ' it is incredible what quantity of charcoal is consumed by one iron- work in a year.' ^ Richard Boyle, the well-known Earl of Cork, was reputed to have made 100,000Z. by his iron-works, and the sale of timber must have brought him almost as much again. Sir William Petty's was another of the great fortunes in part accumulated by the destruction of the woods of Ireland. But that Petty, undoubtedly one of the most large-minded Englishmen whom the confiscations of the seventeenth century attracted to Ireland, was not unmindful of the need for maintaining the timber supplies of the country, may be inferred from the fact that in his ' Political Anatomy of Ireland,' he recommends the ' planting ' of ' three millions of timber trees upon the bounds and mears of every denomination of lands ' in the country.^ So rapid was the consumption, however, that the want of fuel, formerly abundant, began to make itself felt. Thomas Dinely writing in his Journal,^ about the year 1681, remarks on the con- sequent substitution for the first time of turf for wood firing. ' The wars,' he says, * and their rebellions having destroyed almost all their woods both for timber and firing, their want is supplyed by the bogs.' A century later Arthur Young noted that in the neighbourhood of Mitchelstown there were ' a hundred thousand acres in which you might take a breathing gallop to find a stick large enough to beat a dog, ' Boate's Ireland's Natural! History, chapter xvi. ^ Petty's Political Anatomy of Ireland, chapter ii. ^ Reprinted from Kilkenny ArchcBological Society^s Jotirnnl, Second Series. THE WOODS OF IKELAND 151 yet is there not an enclosure without the remnants of trees, many of them large.' ' The troubles of the Kevolution and the succeeding changes were also injurious to the woods. The Commis- sioners of Forfeited Estates comment severely on the general waste committed by the grantees of these properties, in- stancing in particular the woods round Killarney, where trees to the value of 20,000Z. were cut down, and the Muskery district, where the destruction was almost as great. ^ That this reckless dealing with the timber supply of the country was continued for the best part of a genera- tion may be inferred from a passage in the seventh Drapier's Letter, in which Swift asserts his belief ' that there is not another example in Europe of such a prodigious quantity of excellent timber cut down in so short a time with so little advantage to the country either in shipping or building.' ^ This process of rapid consumption of the anciently abundant woods of Ireland continued far into the eighteenth century, and notwithstanding a succession of enactments designed to encourage planting, the woodland areas diminished so rapidly that, to quote Arthur Young once more, ' the greatest part of the country continues to exhibit a naked, bleak, dreary view for want of wood, which has been destroyed for a century past with the most thoughtless prodigality, and still continues to be cut and wasted as if it was not worth the cultivation.' ^ Although some maps of the time of Henry VIII. are extant which indicate very roughly the wooded districts, nothing approaching to a statistical record of the distribu- tion of the woods of Ireland is available for an earlier date than the seventeenth century. Baron Finglas's rough list of passes has already been referred to, and is the earliest specific ' Young's Tour in Ireland, ii. p. 62. The clearance at Mitchelstown deplored by Young has been largely made good by plantations within the last century. '^ Lecky's History of England, ii. p. 330. ^ Swift's Works, ed. Sir W. Scott, vii. p. 52 ; Prose Works, ed. Temple Scott (Bohn's Library), vi. p. 200. * Young's Tour in Ireland, ii. p. 62. 152 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY notice on the subject. In Dymmok's ' Treatise of Ireland,' 1599, is given ' A particular of such strengths and fastnesses of wood and bog as are in every province in Ireland,' ^ in which the principal forest districts are set out by name. It is evident, however, that Dymmok derived his information not from any first-hand acquaintance with the whole country, but from the notes of one of the most diligent inquirers into the condition and resources of Ireland who had ever visited the country, the well-known Sir George Carew. In the Lambeth Manuscripts, which bear his name, are to be found Carew's observations on the subject.^ They are much fuller than Dymmok's list. Half a century after Carew's time, the Books of Survey and Distribution, compiled in 1657, and preserved in the Irish Kecord Office, show the dimensions of the woodlands throughout the country as ascertained at that date. The maps of the Down Survey also indicate in a rough way the distribution of the woods. And a list of the iron-works through the country in the seventeenth century would indicate as many places in which substantial woods still existed at that period. It appears from these and other sources, that at about the close of the seventeenth century the woods or forests of importance were distributed roughly, thus : 1. Leinster: In the counties of Wicklow, Wexford, Carlow, and Kilkenny, and in the great territories of Leix and Offaly, covering the greater portion of Queen's and part of King's County. 2. Ulster: In the counties of Tyrone, Londonderry, Antrim, and Down, particularly on the east and west shores of Lough Neagh, and the territories adjacent. 3. Munster : In Cork, Kerry, and Limerick, the southern borders of Tipperary, and East Waterford. 4. Connaught : In the barony of Tyrawly, in Mayo and North Sligo, in Koscommon, and along the course of the Shannon. It is obvious, however, that the rapid diminution of the ' Irish Arehfflological Society's Tracis Relating to Ireland, ii. p. 26, ' Lambeth MS. 635. THE WOODS OF IKELAND 153 woodland area during the seventeenth century was not an absolutely unmitigated misfortune. It was the natural con- sequence of that social transformation which necessarily fol- lowed the effective assertion of the authority of the English Crown throughout the island in the reign of James I. Apart from all questions between the races, it was as desir- able as it was natural that large districts formerly usurped by the forest should be restored to agriculture. Had the clearances effected, first by the soldiers of Elizabeth and next by the planters of James, ended with those which followed the Kestoration, there would have been no great reason to complain. But an era of confiscation was necessarily un- favourable to the development of the resources of the land ; and successive owners, threatened with the early deter- mination of their interest in their estates, utilised the short period of possession to turn their timber into gold. Thus the woods that had survived fell at an alarm- ing rate, and the Government were obliged to intervene. Accordingly, the Irish statute-book, from the Kestora- tion to the middle of the eighteenth century, contains many measures which had for their object the encourage- ment of planting, and the replacing of the timber in districts from which it had disappeared. Some of these are of great interest, and well deserve attention. The earliest instance of legislation for the protection of trees was the application to Ireland by Strafford of an English statute of Elizabeth ' to avoid and prevent divers misdemeanours of idle and lewd persons in barking of trees.' An Act of 10th Charles I. (chapter 23) gave this measure force in Ireland ; but it appears to have been designed mainly for the protection of the orchards and young trees in the plantation districts, and not to have been directed to the conservation of the larger woods. The seventeenth century had almost run its course before any further statute was passed. In 1698, however, the ministers of William III. felt it was time to intervene. ' An Act for Planting and Preserving Timber Trees and Woods ' recognises in its preamble the operation of the causes 154 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY which had led to the too rapid destruction of the old woods. It runs thus : — ' Forasmuch as by the late re- bellion in the Kingdom and the several iron-works formerly here, the timber is utterly destroyed, so as that at present there is not sufficient for the repairing the houses destroyed, much less a prospect of building and improving in after times, unless some means be used for the planting and increase of timber trees.' The remedies prescribed by this act were threefold : I. All resident freeholders, having estates to the value of 10/. yearly and upwards, and all tenants for years at a rent exceeding that sum, having an unexpired term of ten years, were required, under a penalty from and after March 25, 1703, to plant every year, for thirty-one years, ten plants of five years' growth of oak, fir, elm, ash, or other timber. Owners of iron-works were required to plant five hundred such trees annually, so long as the iron-works were going. II. Every occupier of above five hundred Irish acres was required to plant and enclose, within seven years of the passing of the Act, one acre thereof, and to preserve the same as a plantation for at least twenty years. III. All persons and corporations seized of lands of inheritance were charged with the planting of their respec- tive proportions of 260,600 trees yearly of oak, elm, or fir for a period of thirty-one years. The proportions in which these trees were to be planted in each county is set out in a list in the fourth section of the act, and the proportion in which each county should be planted was to be apportioned by the grand juries, by baronies, and parishes at each summer assizes.' A further provision gave tenants planting pursuant to the statute a right to one-third of the timber so planted. This was increased by a later Act to one-half. The legislation of William III. was followed by several acts passed in succeeding reigns with the same object. An ' lOth Wm. III. cap. 12. As the list given in Section 4 throws some light on the relative needs of each county in regard to timber at the time, it is printed in Appendix II. to this paper. THE W00t)S OF IRELAND 155 Act of Queen Anne abolished the duties on un wrought iron, bark, hoops, staves and timber, and forbade exportation of these commodities except to England. And a further Act forbade the use of home-grown gads or withes, or the erection of May-poles of home-growth. These Acts, however, failed to produce the desired effect.^ Thomas Prior, in the ap- pendix to his List of Absentees, attributed this failure to the insufficient interest given to tenants in the trees planted by them, and suggested that planting should be encouraged by obliging owners, on the fall of leases, to pay their tenants the timber value of all trees planted by the latter. An Act of George III. passed in 1775 expressly recognised in its preamble the failure of the earlier legislation, which it accordingly repealed. It made fresh provision for the preservation of trees, and did something to carry out Prior's views, which were zealously supported by the Royal Dublin Society, an institution of which Prior was one of the founders, and which has always been honourably distin- guished by the interest it has displayed in the preservation of the woods of Ireland. The stimulating criticism and suggestions of Arthur Young, who, as already noted, visited Ireland just at this time, undoubtedly had much to do with the more enlightened views on the subject which, towards the close of the eigh- teenth century, began to characterise the majority of Irish landowners. One or two of his observations on this subject are worth quoting. * I have made,' says Young, * many very minute calculations of the expense, growth, and value of trees in Ireland, and am convinced from them that there is no application of the best land of the kingdom will equal the profit of planting the worst of it.'^ The remark savours, perhaps, of the accustomed optimism of the reforming " Swift, in his seventh Drapicr's Letter, already quoted, recommended 'that the defects in those Acts for planting forest-trees might be fully supplied, since they have hitherto been wholly ineffectual, except about the demesnes of a few gentlemen,' and recommended that owners should be restrained from ' that unlimited liberty of cutting down their woods before their proper time ' ' to supply expenses in England,' as he puts it elsewhere in the same letter. " Young's Toitr in Ireland, ii. p. 64. 156 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY stranger who has never submitted his theories to the test of practice, and is ready to sell wisdom before he has bought experience. But no more competent observer than Arthur Young has ever applied a trained and cautious intelligence to the consideration of the economic problems of Ireland. It is certain that, however wisely we may hesitate to adopt literally this epigrammatic summary of his views on planting, Young's opinions were based on an unusually thorough statistical investigation of the country, coupled with an ex- ceptionally wide knowledge of agricultural conditions in other European countries. Young's observations on the subject are the more worth noting in view of modern conditions because he bestowed much attention on the means of enlisting the peasantry in the cause of planting, and displayed a firm confidence that * instead of being the destroyers of trees they might be made preservers of them.' With this view he recommends in his ' Observations ' that premiums should be given to farmers who planted and preserved trees, and suggested that the tenantry should be obliged to plant under a special clause in their leases, requiring them to plant a given number of trees per annum in proportion to the size of their holdings. THE WOODS OF IRELAND 157 APPENDIX I WOODS AND FASTNESSES IN ULSTER. Glenbrasell, by Lough Eaugh (Lough Neagh), a great boggy and wooddy fastnes. Glencan, a boggy and wooddy country environed with two rivers viz. : the Blackwater and the Ban. Killultagh, a safe boggy and wooddy country, upon Lough Eaugh. Kilwarlen, the like bounden together. Kilautry, lying between Kilwarlen and Lecale. Glenconkeyn,' on the river Ban's side, in O'Chane's country, the chief fastnes and refuge of the Scotts. THE LENGTH AND BREADTH OF THE WOODS AND FASTNESSES IN MUNSTER. Glengaruf, in O'Sullivan More's country, 4 miles long and 2 broad. Glanroght, in Desmond, 3 long and 2 broad. Leanmore, in Desmond, 3 long and 3 broad. Glenglas and Kilmore in the Co. Limerick, 12 long and 7 broad. Dromfynine, in the County Cork, on the Blackwater, 6 long and 2 broad. Arlo and Muskryquirke, in Tipperary, 9 long and 3 broad. Kilhuggy, in Tipperary, bordering on Limerick, 10 long and 7 broad. Glenflesk, 4 long and 2 broad. WOODS AND FASTNESSES IN CONNAUGHT. The woods and bogs of Kilbigher. Killcallon, in MacWilliam's county. Killaloa, in county of Leitrim. The woods and boggs near the Corleua. WOODS AND FASTNESSES IN LEINSTER. Glandilour, a fastness in Pheagh M'Hugh's couutrie. Shilelagh, Sir Henry Harrington's, in the county of Dublin. ' Sir John Davies described Glanconkeyn in 1608 as ' the great forest of Glenconkeyn, well nigh as large as the New Forest in Hampshire, and stored with the best timber.' He suggested that the timber should be used for the royal navy, but it was eventually devoted to the building of Londondeny. Ulster ArchcBological Journal, vi. p. 153, 158 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY The Duffries, in the County of Wexford. The Drones and Leverocke, in the county of Catherlogh. The great bog in the Queen's County, which reacheth to Limerick. The Fuse in the County of Kildare. The woodland bogs of Monaster-Evan, Gallin and Slievemargy in the Queen's County. The Rowry, near St. Mullins, where the Nur and Barrow unite together, and makes yt halfe an island. Part of Coulbracke, joyning upon the County of Kilkenny.^ APPENDIX II STATUTE 18th WILLIAM III. CAP. I. SECTION 4. And be it further enacted, that the proportion of each county, county of a city, and county of a town of the said two hundred and sixty thousand six hundred trees aforesaid, is and shall be as hereinafter is declared. 1. Antrim county and Carrickfergus, nine thousand seven hundred and fifty. 2. Ardmagh county, four thousand seven hundred and fifty. 3. Catherlagh county, three thousand two hundred and fifty. 4. Cavan county, four thousand six hundred. 5. Clare county, seven thousand eight hundred. 6. Cork county and city, twenty-six thousand six hundred. 7. Donegal county, eight thousand three hundred and fifty. 8. Down county, eight thousand four hundred. 9. Dublin county (whereof the city and its liberties, twenty-one thousand five hundred) thirty-one thousand nine hundred. 10. Fermanagh county, four thousand five hundred and fifty. 11. Gallway county (whereof on Gall way town and liberties, one thousand three hundred) eleven thousand eight hundred. 12. Kerry county, four thousand six hundred. 13. Kildare county, seven thousand one hundred and fifty. 14. Kilkenny county (whereof on Kilkenny city and liberties, seven hundred) nine thousand. ' Of the places enumerated which are not sufficiently indicated in Carew's note have been thus identified : Kilwarlen, in the co. Down, waa the fastness of the Magenis sept in the co. Down. Glenroght or Glenroghty is now Kenmare. Leanmore is the modern Killarney. Glenglas is Clonlish in co. Limerick. Arlo is the Arlo Hill of Spenser. THE WOODS OF IRELAND 159 15. King's county, three thousand nine hundred. 16. Leitrim county, three thousand two hundred and fifty. 17. Limerick county (whereof on Limerick city and Uberties, one thousand three hundred) nine thousand six hundred. 18. Londonderry county, city and barony of Colerain, six thou- sand five hundred. 19. Longford county, two thousand six hundred. 20. Lowth county (whereof Drogheda and hberties, six hundred and fifty) five thousand two hundred. 21. Mayo county, six thousand five hundred. 22. Meath county, twelve thousand three hundred and fifty. 23. Monaghan county, four thousand five hundred. 24. Queen's county, three thousand nine hundred and fifty. 25. Roscommon county, six thousand five hundred. 26. SHgo county, five thousand two hundred. 27. Tipperary and Holy-Cross, eighteen thousand two hundred. 28. Tyrone county, six thousand five hundred. 29. Waterford county (whereof on Waterford city and liberties, one thousand and fifty) six thousand five hundred and fifty. 30. Westmeath county, six thousand six hundred. 31. Wexford county, six thousand five hundred. 32. Wicklow county, three thousand two hundred and fifty. VI THE PARISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT Honourable as is the antiquity of the parish of St. Andrew's, and varied as are the sources of interest from which it derives its importance in the history of the Irish capital, it is not primarily upon its priority in the roll of Dublin parishes that its attraction depends. Indeed, notwithstanding that the precise date of its origin, running back to the days of the Scandinavian kingdom of Dublin, is lost in the haze of history, it may be doubted whether the strictness of antiquarian pedantry would class St. Andrew's among the ancient metropolitan parishes at all. For, lying outside the walls, neither the church itself nor any part of the parish could at any time have been reckoned as part of the mediaeval city, whose eastern boundary terminated at Dammas Gate, just below the Castle Yard. It is in fact as the first of suburban, rather than as among the most ancient of city parishes that St. Andrew's claims pre-eminence. This fact is sufficiently emphasised by the language of an Act of Parliament so modern as the statute under which the parish was reconstituted after the Kestoration, in which the church of St. Andrew's is still described as ' in the suburbs of the city of Dublin.' It requires, indeed, no inconsiderable effort of the imagination to picture the parish to which the church of St. Andrew's originally ministered in the days when all Dublin lay within the walls, when green fields stretched right up to the Castle and down to the banks of the Liffey, and when only the village of Hogges, or Hoggen Green, lying on the eminence on which the modern church now stands, and the monastery of All Hallows, intervened between the City and Kingsend. PAEISH CHUECH OF THE IRISH PAELIAMENT 161 The erection of a church outside the city walls, yet immediately adjacent to them, was almost certainly due to the Danish occupation of Dublin. And it may even be that the parish is older than the walls. As in the case of St. Bride's and St. Michan's, the earliest associations of St. Andrew's parish are connected with the Danes. Almost the first docu- mentary mention of St. Andrew's itself suggests this. It occurs in the register of the Priory of All Hallows, which re- cords a grant in the year 1241 of land, described as situate in ' Thingmotha, in the parish of St. Andrew's, Dublin.' ^ Now the Thingmotha, or Thingmount, was a conical hill some fifty feet high, used as the meeting place of the Danes of Dublin. Mr. Haliday has conclusively located its site as immediately adjacent to that of the present church, where indeed it remained down to the year 1685. It was hard by this spot, but a little to the west, that Henry II, was lodged on his arrival in Dublin in the palace of earth roofed with wattles which the old chronicler, Eoger de Hoveden, describes ^ as having been * built near the church of St. An- drew's the apostle, without the walls of the city of Dublin.' The church thus referred to lay westward of the present edifice, and there it remained down to the close of the sixteenth century.^ Concerning the appearance the ancient church presented there is now no sort of record ; but of its importance among Dublin churches as early as the thirteenth century there is some evidence. The charter granted by Henri de Londres, Archbishop of Dublin, to the Dean and Chapter of St. Patrick's in 1219, assigned the church of St. Andrew's to the support of the precentor. This was the commencement of an enduring connection between the parish and the cathedral. But it is not certain that the connection was altogether to the advantage of the former, since the duties of their parochial incumbency not unnaturally sat lightly on the cathedral dignitaries. The parish remained in the charge of the precentor for a space of ' Haliday's Scandinavian Kingdom of Dublin, p. 162. - Roger de Hoveden, ch. ii. p. 32 (Rolls Series). See p. 4 supra. ' It occupied with its churchyard a plot of ground on the south side of Dame Street, about where the Munster and Leiuster Bank now stands. M 162 ILLUSTKATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY some three centuries, during which history is almost silent. It is more than probable that the union of the living of St. Andrew's with the cathedral precentorship was due to the decline in the importance of the parish as a residential suburb. According to Stanihurst, who wrote late in the sixteenth century, St. George's Lane, the modern South Great George's Street, which is shown in Speed's map of 1610 as practically the only inhabited street in the parish, was anciently a place of more consequence. To use his own words, ' An insearcher of antiquities may (by the view there to be taken) conjecture the better part of the suburbs of Dublin should seem to have stretched that way. But the inhabitants being daily and hourly molested and preided on by their proUing mountain neighbours were forced to suffer their buildings to fall in decay, and embaied themselves within the city walls.' Stanihurst narrates in proof of this assertion a striking incident, which vividly recalls the dangers of Dublin life in these early times ; and indicates the origin of an important thoroughfare in St. Andrew's parish. ' Among other monuments there is a place in that lane called now Collet's Inns, which in old time was the Escaxor or Exchecker, which should imply that the princes court would not have been kept there unless the place had been taken to be cocksure. But in fine it fell out contrarie. For the baron sitting there solemnlie and as it seemed retchleslie [recklessly] ; the Irish espying the opportunity, rushed into the Court in plumps, where surpris- ing the unweaponed multitude, they committed terrible slaughters by sparing none that came under their dint, and withal, as far as their Scarborogh leisure would serve them, they ransacked the princes treasure, upon which mishap the Exchecker was from thence removed.' ' Whether or not the allocation of its revenues to the ' Description of Ireland, Holinshed, p. 27. Stanihurst's account of the situation of the Exchequer as originally outside the Castle is confirmed by entries in the Pipe Roll of 28 Edward I. which speak of mending ' the great gate of the Castle towards the Exchequer.' The expression ' Scarborough leisure,' as an equivalent to no leisure at all, is believed to be derived from a salutary habit of ' hasty hanging for rank robbery ' anciently in vogue in Scarborough. See Nares's Glossary. PAEISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 163 precentor indicates that the declension of the church of St. Andrew's in the scale of importance had begun so early as the time of Henri de Londres, it is certain that the parish fell gradually into decay. By the middle of the sixteenth century it had ceased to justify its continued independent existence. Accordingly in the administrative readjustment which followed the Reformation, Archbishop George Browne united the parish of St. Andrew's to that of St. Werburgh's, ' in regard there are so few parishioners, and the income so small that there is not sufficient to maintain a clergyman.' ^ Thenceforward the church ceased to be maintained as such. In the same year which witnessed its amalgamation with St. Werburgh's, one John Ryan, a merchant, obtained ai lease for twenty-one years of the rectory of St. Andrew the Apostle and also the chapel of St. Andrew and the cemetery of said chapel, ' together with a garden, three orchards and a dove house, for the yearly rent of 24s, 4(Z.' ^ Such was the value of Dublin ground rents three centuries and a half ago. A few years later, in 1561, the church was given up, almost literally, to the tables of the money-changers ; for the Lords Justices recommended, as the fittest place for the mint, ' the Castle of Dublin with the help of the chapel next without the Gate ' ; ^ and in the catalogue of churches in the city and suburbs of Dublin, given by Stanihurst in 1586, ' St. Andrews — now profaned ' is the last on the list. Thirty years or so after the suppression of the parish the ancient edifice suffered a still more marked degradation. The precentorship of St. Patrick's had fallen into the hands of one Sir Arthur Athy, who had been presented to it by the patron Robert, Earl of Leicester, the husband of Amy Rob- sart.'' Athy appears to have been a soldier ; but otherwise he had nothing to do with the Church militant, for he was not even in orders. Notwithstanding this he was by special letters from Queen Elizabeth preferred to the dignity,^ and granted a dispensation to hold it. On May 31, 1581, Athy ' D'Alton's Archbishops of Dithlin, p. 230. - Mason's St. Patrick'' s, p. 32 ' Cal. State Papers, 1509-73, p. 171. * Morrin's Gal. of Patent Rolls, p. 17. ' Cal. Irish S. P. 1603-6, p. 169; Mason, App. p. 71. 164 ILLUSTKATTONS OF IKISH HISTOEY demised his chantership to Leicester, ' the Chanter's House only excepted,' for a term of fifty years at the yearly rent of 60Z. Irish. Thereupon the church was turned into a stable and yard for the Viceroy, its situation in the immediate vicinity of the Castle rendering it extremely convenient for this purpose. With the sacrilege of Precentor Sir Arthur Athy — for the transaction deserves no better name— the history of the ancient church of St. Andrew^'s terminates. For close upon three-quarters of a century nothing w^as done to restore or replace it. But the conversion of the edifice to these base uses led to not the least interesting episode in the history of the parish. Whatever the verdict of history on the errors and imprudences of Archbishop Laud, the sincerity of his zeal for the orderly government of the Church according to his conception of it, and his resolution to repress and correct ecclesiastical scandals and abuses, have never been called in question. The debasement of the church of St. Andrew's to profane uses affords an instance of the thoroughness of his supervision of Church affairs. From the year 1603 to 1635 the precentorship of St. Patrick's was held by Athy's successor. Dr. George Andrews, who joined with this dignity the deanery of Limerick. Andrews appears to have asserted his rights as incumbent, and in 1631 obtained a decree in the Chancery of the Court of Exchequer in a suit against the Crown for the recovery of his church, averring that ' the parishioners were ready and willing to be at great charges in re-edifying, building, and beautifying the said church.' ^ An injunction issued accordingly to Lord Chan- cellor Loftus, as one of the Lords Justices of Ireland in the absence of the Deputy, to deliver up possession to Andrews as rector. Loftus, however, did not immediately obey. For though he wrote to the Lord Deputy, Sir Thomas Wentworth, then on the eve of entering on his momentous Viceroyalty, that ' the church may not therefore any longer be continued in its former use ; so as it will be fit that some of your servants do think of providing you another stable,' ' Strafford's Letters, i. p. 68 ; Cal. S. P. {Ireland), March 26, 1632. PAEISH CHUKCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 165 steps were taken to render the decree of the Exchequer abortive. By the procurement either of Loftus or of Straf- ford himself, a King's Letter issued, staying the injunction and continuing the Crown in possession till the new Lord Deputy should arrive. Hereupon Andrews, who was evi- dently a man of resolution, laid the matter before Laud, who, though not yet Archbishop of Canterbury, was known to be the guiding spirit of the ecclesiastical policy of Charles I. as well as the firm ally of the new Lord Deputy. ' The Church of St. Andrew's in Dublin,' Andrews wrote on March 26, 1G32, ' was 460 years ago annexed to the Chanter- ship of St. Patrick's, Dubhn, of which I am the incumbent. About fifty years ago the incumbent (Sir George Athy, Knt.) being absent, it was (liorresco referens) turned into a stable for the Deputy's horses, it being close to the walls of Dublin Castle.' Laud lost no time in laying the complaint before Strafford, and received from the latter an undertaking to investigate the scandal. Nor was he content to leave the matter here, for Strafford had scarcely seated himself in the Irish government than he received a lengthy letter from the Bishop of London on questions affecting the Church of Ireland, the very first paragraph of which was devoted to the affairs of St. Andrew's. ' I humbly pray your Lordship,' Laud wrote, ' to remem- ber what you have promised me concerning the church at Dublin, which hath for divers years been used as a stable by your predecessors, and to vindicate it to God's service as you shall there examine and find the merits of the cause.' ^ Strafford, it is evident, lent a friendly ear to Laud's repre- sentations, for shortly afterwards in an official letter to England, in which he made complaint of the ruinous con- dition of Dublin Castle, he observes that ' there is not any stable but a poor mean one, and that made of a deca3'^ed church, which is such a profanation as I am sure his Majesty would not allow of ; besides there is a decree in the Exchequer for restoring it to the parish whence it was taken ; I have therefore got a piece of ground whereon to build a ' April 30, 1633, Strafford's Letters, i. p. 81. 166 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY new one.' And a little later he wrote to Laud, ' For the stable to be restored I have already given order for bounder- ing out the Church Yard, and will have another built by June next, and then, God willing, turn back to His Church all which the King's Deputies formerly had from it.' ' Dean Andrews, who had thus the merit of instituting the movement for a restoration, did not long remain in the precentorship. Having earned the disfavour both of Straf- ford and Laud by endeavouring to procure the insertion of certain Irish articles in the Articles of the Church of England, he was kicked upstairs into the pauper bishopric of Ferns and Leighlin.^ Whether in consequence of Andrews' removal from the charge of the parish or owing to the troubles of the times, no effective steps were taken for the restoration of the old church, which, though it ceased to be used as a stable, was suffered to fall into ruin, notwith- standing that an assessment seems to have been levied at this time to provide funds for rebuilding. In 1644 Sir George Wentworth, a brother of Strafford's, obtained a lease of the glebe, which had been excepted from Athy's lease to Leicester, for forty years, at a rent of 401. per annum. On the ground so obtained he built a house at a cost of 600/.^ The glebe had stood on the south side of Dame Street, which by Strafford's day had at length begun to be uti- lised for building purposes. Prior to Strafford's time the only residence in this direc- tion was Chichester House, formerly Cary's Hospital, which Sir Arthur Chichester, the well-known Deputy of James I., had made his home in consequence of the pestilential condition of the official residence at Dublin Castle. The intervening space between Chichester House and the city ' Strafford's Letters, i. pp. 131, 173. ^ See Appendix I., Dean Andrews. Strafford's references to this controversy illustrate his extraordinary interest in the details ot his work in Ireland. They make excellent reading, though they are somewhat hard on Dean Andrews. Indeed, no better example can be found of the masterful vigour with which the great Deputy crushed all opposition to his will, or of the utter lack of considera- tion for the feelings of his opponents which was a principal cause of his own undoing. ^ Mason's Histcyry of St. Patrick's Cathedral, p. 34. PAKISH CHUKCH OF THE IKISH PAELIAMENT 167 walls now began to be occupied by a succession of stately mansions, which, with their spacious grounds stretching to the river, covered the whole area from the northern front of what are now Dame Street and College Green back to the Liffey, whose southern bank must at that time have fol- lowed the line of the modern Fleet Street. Of these, the first was built by Sir Christopher Wandesford, Master of the Eolls during Strafford's tenure of the Viceroyalty, who had led the way in the movement of fashionable Dublin in an easterly direction, by setting up his abode in the same street, in a house near the modern Grattan Bridge, * with a good orchard and gardens leading down to the water-side, where might be seen the ships from the Ringsend coming from any part of the kingdom, from England, Scotland, or any other country, before they went up to the bridge.' At the time of the Restoration the chief of these houses were inhabited by Arthur Annesley, Earl of Anglesey and Lord Treasurer of Ireland, by one John Crow, an eminent citizen of the day, and by Sir Maurice Eustace, the Lord Chancellor. Their memory is preserved for us in Anglesea Street, Crow Street, and Eustace Street, which were formed along their respective sites on the demo- lition of these mansions a generation later. The extension of the city was, however, by no means confined to College Green. It included the district of the Stane or Lazy Hill, the name then applied to what are now College Street and Brunswick Street. To the growth of Dublin without its eastern wall, and the covering of Hoggen Green and its vicinity with houses, is due the revival of St. Andrew's as an effective parish. A residential district so fashionable as the neighbourhood had become could not but need a church in its midst, and the accommodation at St. Werburgh's was probably inadequate to the demand. Accordingly, in an Act passed in 1665 * for the provision of ministers in cities,' several sections were devoted to the revival of ' the Church of St. Andrews in the suburbs of Dublin,' and the incorporation with it of Lazy Hill.^ ' Statute 17 & 18 Charles II. cap. 7, sections 3, 4, 5, and 6. 168 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY The third section of this statute sets forth the state of the case in the following terms : Whereas the parish church of St. Andrews in the county of the city of Dublin hath been wholly demolished for these many years past, and no effectual care taken for the rebuild- ing thereof, whereby the inhabitants of the said parish and of Lazars, alias Lazy-hill, have had no place within themselves for the public service of God, to the great dishonour of God and the discomfort of the people, may it therefore be enacted — that the ambite and tract of ground commonly called the Stane, alias Lazar, alias Lazy-hill be constituted and made part of the parish of St. Andrews aforesaid. Thus the whole district of what is now the parish of St. Mark's was added to St. Andrew's, and so remained for above forty years, until it was severed, as will be seen later on, by a Statute of Queen Anne. The Act proceeded to provide for the rebuilding of the parish church by the voluntary con- tributions of the inhabitants ; to ordain that it should be presentative as a vicarage ; to nominate as the first vicar Dr. Kichard Lingard, a distinguished fellow of Trinity College, and to appoint Arthur, Earl of Anglesey, his Majesty's Vice-Treasurer, Sir John Temple, Master of the Eolls, whose former residence in the parish is commemorated by Temple-Bar, and Sir Maurice Eustace, Knight, a nephew of the Lord Chancellor of that name, to be churchwardens of the parish for the first two years. Power was given to these officers to make an assessment upon the inhabitants for the building of the church, and the relief of the poor of the parish. The ancient rights of the precentor of St. Patrick's were specially recognised in the sixth section of the Act, which, after reciting that ' the rectory of the church of St. Andrews together with certain houses and their back sides enclosed within the churchyard have anciently belonged to the precentor of the Cathedral Church of St. Patrick, enacted that the precentor for the time being should con- tinue to be rector of the parish, and appropriated the sum of 101. per annum to be paid to him by the vicar. Thus far the description here given of the ancierit history PAEISH CHUKCH OF THE lEISH PARLIAMENT 169 of the parish of St. Andrew's has been based upon such scattered fragments of information as can be culled from various extraneous sources. But in the post-Restoration history we tread on firmer ground. From the date of the reconstitution of the parish under the Act just cited, we have the invaluable assistance of the admirably complete records which, despite the demolition of the church erected in 1670, and the destruction by fire of its successor, have been fortunately preserved in complete sequence from that date. The vestry books commence with the year 1670, and the first of them, which embraces a period of thirty-six years, throws much light not only on the rebuilding of the church, but on the social condition of this important Dublin parish in the last quarter of the seventeenth century. The minutes of the first vestry meeting record a resolution passed on April 5, 1670, ' that according to the tenor of our Act of Parliament the church shall forthwith be built on the place agreed upon, being a certain parcel of land lying within the said parish commonly called the old Bowling-Green, given unto the said parish by the Lord Bishop of Meath for the foresaid use so far as his interest is therein.' The site so chosen was considerably eastward of the site of the former church, and immediately adjacent to the ancient Thingmount, which had been preserved as public ground for the recreation of the citizens down to the j^ear 1661. The Bowling Green very probably occupied the site formerly devoted to the grounds round Tib and Tom, a small range of buildings adjacent to the Mount, where (according to the historian Harris) the citizens amused themselves at leisure times by playing at keals or ninepins — a pastime which has left its record in an old Dublin proverb, ' he struck at Tib and down fell Tom.' ' In 1661 this ground had been leased by the city authorities to Dr. Henrj^ Jones, Bishop of Meath, at a small rent, but with a proviso that ' a passage six feet wide and thirty feet square from the top to the bottom of the hill should be preserved to the city for ' See Haliday's Scandinavian Kingdom of Dublin, p. 163, where an old woodcut of the Thingmount is reproduced. 170 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY their common prospect, and that no building or other thing should be erected on the premises for obstructing of the said prospect.' But by 1670 this reservation had been so far ignored as to be no longer worth insisting on. No objection was taken by the Corporation to the erection of the church, and a few years later the Thingmount, which by that time had become entirely surrounded by buildings, was utterly demolished. No time was lost in proceeding with the building of the new church. From the first it was modelled upon the plan which, though rebuilt at the end of the eighteenth century, it retained down to 1860. The vestry book records a resolution passed on April 18, 1670, ' that the oval model drawn by Mr. William Dodson shall be the model according to which the parish church of St. Andrews shall be built.' Dodson appears to have been at the head of his profession in the Dublin of his day, and to have been much employed by the Government, under whose auspices he was responsible for the laying out of the Phoenix Park, as at first designed.^ It does not appear whence he drew his inspiration in choos- ing the oval design, nor has any sketch of the seventeenth century church come down to us. But inasmuch as the foundations were utilised in the rebuilding more than one hundred years later, and its old shape substantially preserved, its form cannot have differed materially from that of the later edifice so well known to the citizens of Dublin a generation ago by the name of the Round Church.2 Before entering on the history of the revived parish it may be convenient to trace the subsequent fate of the earlier church and its cemetery. For some time the ruins remained derelict and unsaleable on the hands of the parish, which made more than one abortive attempt to dispose of them. On September 2, 1673, the vestry, considering that ' the old ' See p. 56 supra. - Descriptions of the Bound Church are to be found in Brewer's Beauties of Ireland, i. p. 123 ; and in Cromwell's Excxirsions thrmigh Ireland, i. p. 70. PAEISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 171 Churchyard in Dammas Street was waste and of no advantage to the inhabitants,' ordered ' that it be exposed to sale on the fourth day of November next, and that pubHcly in the Church in the afternoon to all such persons whether strangers or parishioners as shall bid most for the same.' But there was no bidder. Three years later it was arranged that Captain John Nicholas, ' a worthy benefactor of the Church,' should have the use of the old churchyard in satisfaction for 150^. due to him for materials supplied for the building of the new church, ' provided always that he do not stir the corpses nor dig the ground otherwise than to level it.' ^ Nicholas sub- sequently'^ obtained a formal lease of the ground, which was described as ' all that piece or plot of ground lying and being in Dames Street in the parish of St. Andrews called the old Churchyard, being by computation one hundred and tw^ity feet in length fronting to the said street, and about one hundred and twenty-one feet backward.' The lease then given to Nicholas was some years later assigned to Alderman Sir William Fownes, an eminent citizen whose memory is preserved in the street which bears his name. To him the parish made a fresh lease for forty- one years from December 25, 1698, on the understanding that he was about to carry out large improvements. These improvements consisted in the formation of the Castle Market, which covered a part of the cemetery, and was opened in 1704. In 1717 Sir William Fownes, ' finding little advantage in his lease which obliged him not to dig any cellars or build great dwelling houses,' applied for a new lease, and having obtained one on favourable terms, erected on the remainder a number of houses in Castle Lane, now known as Palace Street.^ The Castle Market was removed in 1782, when the Wide Streets Commissioners began their operations, and a portion of the old cemetery is now daily trodden by the traffic of one of the busiest thoroughfares in Dubhn. The succession of the clergy of St. Andrew's during the whole of its recorded history down to the Kestoration is, as ' Oct. 4, 1676. •■' Jan. 1678. ' Harris's History of Diihlin, p. 103. 172 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY already noted, identical with the succession of the pre- centors of St. Patrick's ; and even under the Statute recon- stituting the parish, the precentors retained the title and some of the emoluments of rector. Their names may be found by the curious in Mason's ' History of St. Patrick's.' ^ But with the building of the church there opened a new, and on the whole distinguished, line of vicars, in whose persons it will be convenient to trace the later history of the parish. Of these the first was Dr. Richard Lingard, sometime Dean of Lismore, and Professor of Divinity in the University of Dublin, whose memory and virtues have been recalled in one of the late Professor Stokes's charming lectures.'^ Lingard, who was a Cambridge Don, selected by the first Duke of Ormond as one of the Fellows of Trinity College on its reconstitution after the Eestoration, was named in the Act of Parliament as the first Vicar of the revived parish. His selection may perhaps be held to indicate a desire on the part of the ecclesiastical authorities to associate Trinity College with the parish in which it lay. But Lingard can have had little active connection with St. Andrew's. Though designated as vicar in the Act of Parliament of 1665, Lingard's name appears but once in the vestry book ; and he died in November of 1670, long before the completion of the church, which was not opened for worship until some years later. Lingard was succeeded by perhaps the most celebrated divine on the roll of the vicars of St. Andrew's, the well- known Anthony Dopping, successively Bishop of Kildare and Meath : a prelate remarkable not only for the in- dependence he exhibited in the troubled period of the Revo- lution, but for his once well-known theological writings. From the date of his appointment in 1670 to his elevation to the episcopate, Dopping proved a vigorous parish clergy- man. He evinced the keenest interest in the affairs of his charge, advancing money from his own purse for the build- ' Mason, Notes, p. Ixx. * Worthies of the Irish Church, pp. 3-31. PAEISH CHUECH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 173 ing fund, and zealously upholding the rights of the parish. Of his energy in this respect, as well as of his antiquarian knowledge, the vestry books contain an interesting illustra- tion, which incidentally throws valuable light on the ancient state of the parish. St. Andrew's had been amalgamated at the Reformation, as already stated, with the adjacent parish of St. Werburgh's, a church like itself of great antiquity and of Danish origin. It is scarcely surprising that when, after the lapse of above a century, St. Andrew's regained its independence, some difficulty should have been experienced in determining the bounds of the two parishes. A somewhat angry contro- versy arose upon the claim of St. Werburgh's that the bounds of St. Werburgh's parish ' do extend without the Dammas Gate on both sides of the way unto the water- course that runs through the Castle yard (the Poddle) and so along by the Horse Guard, and then empties itself at the end of Essex Street into the Liffey.' The claim of St Werburgh's, which, on reference to the arbitration of the Archbishop of Dublin, was ultimately substantiated, rested upon an order of vestry,' dated just a century earlier, which established, with the concurrence of the parishioners of St. Andrew's, that the watercourse just mentioned formed the boundary of the parishes.^ Dr. Dopping, however, strenu- ously resisted the claim. In an elaborate ' Account of the Rights of St. Andrew's Parish ' he adduced a variety of testimony in support of his side of the question, in the course of which he made the following interesting assertions as regards the topography of this part of Dublin, which though not, perhaps, capable of being sustained, are certainly suggestive.^ ' Aug. 22, 1574. ^ See Gilbert's History of Dublin, iii. p. 355. ^ ' Supposing it to be true that the watercourse was the boundary, the query still remains, whether the watercourse be not altered, and the current directed another way, since it appears out of the Chronicles and history of Ireland : 1. That the sea did anciently flow up as far as Ship Street, where it met with the stream that came down under Powle-Gate Bridge ; 2. That boats have passed about the city walls as far as Newgate ; 3. That it is not so very long ago since the ground (where now the Council Chamber and Essex Street 174 ILLUSTKATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY In 1674, during Dr. Dopping's incumbency, the new church was completed and opened for pubhc worship. The pewholders inchided, as appears from the vestry books, a number of the most influential residents in Dublin. Among them were the Lord Mayor of the city, who had a seat allotted to him officially ; Primate Margetson ; the Coun- tesses of Clancarty and Mountrath ; Dr. Jones, Bishop of Meath, by whom the site had been presented, and to whom a burial vault had been allotted ; and Sir James Ware, the Auditor-General, and son of the well-known antiquary and historian. Dopping was elevated to the episcopal bench in 1678, and was succeeded in the vicarage by Michael Hewetson, subsequently Archdeacon of Armagh, and author of a curious little work entitled ' A Description of St. Patrick's Purgatory in Lough Derg, and an Account of the Pilgrim's Business there.' ^ Hewetson' s tenure of the incumbency lasted for fifteen years, and covered the troublous period of James II. 's reign and deposition. An entry in the vestry books in Dr. Hewetson's handwriting indicates the apprehensions felt for the safety of the church while King James's Parliament sat. It relates to the church plate, and sets forth how ' the silver plate belonging to St. Andrew's Church, consisting of eight pieces, were in the late troublesome time ' committed to the rector's care. Two of these pieces, a pair of patens, still form part of the church plate, and bear the inscription, ' pre- served in '89 '90.' 2 Dr. Hewetson's successor was Dr. John Travers, who stand) was a perfect strand, and recovered from the sea by Jacob Newman from whom the Earl of Strafford after bought it for the King's use ; 4. That the watercourse did anciently run close to the town and castle walls, and from thence it passed under Dammas Bridge, and so emptied itself into the LifTey ; 5. I do find further by perusal of ancient history that, before the city walls were built, and for some time after, the water ran round the city of Dublin, and it had large trenches about twenty yards broad ; 6. The plot of ground on which the Dammes Mills now stands was anciently called " Insula de le Dames," which supposed a double watercourse encompassing it.' Bishop Dopping was writing as an advocate, in which capacity even a bishop cannot always be reckoned trustworthy. Certainly his advocacy of the case for St. Werburgh's is more adroit than his antiquarian statements are accurate. ' Dublin, 1727. ^ See Appendix II. to this paper. PAEISH CHUECH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 175 curiously enough had occupied the position to which his predecessor at St. Andrew's succeeded, of Archdeacon of Armagh. During the space of thirty-four years he ministered in this parish, to which he was a generous benefactor, and the period was signahsed by important changes. Dr. Travers built at his own expense an almshouse for widows, and a girls' school, which he erected on a site between Trinity Street and Exchequer Street, purchased from Trinity College, on which Trinity Hall, the original College of Physicians, had formerly stood. He was also a generous benefactor of the parish in his will, and he manifestly en- joyed the warm affection of his flock. The minutes of the vestry for February 25, 1694, the year following Dr. Travers' appointment, contain a curious entry, which proves that this seventeenth century vicar was not untroubled by ritual- istic controversies. It sets forth * a complaint against Mr. Travers, malitiously forged and delivered to His Grace the Archbishop of Dublin,' of which the principal allegations were that Divine offices were not performed, nor the Sacra- ments administered with sufficient diligence, that sermons were not preached on holy days, nor a surplice worn by the minister on such days, and that several rubrics formerly observed were neglected by Dr. Travers. These charges, which appear to have been instigated by Dr. Hewetson, were indignantly repudiated by the vestry, who, after eulogising Dr. Travers' * reverent, decent, and diligent per- formance of his ministerial duties,' proceeded to evince the evangelical colour of their Protestantism by this uncom- promising declaration : — ' The aforesaid information is for the most part false, and in whatever instance 'tis true, we are much better pleased with the alleged omissions than we were with the unnecessary overdoings in the late Vicar's time.' But by far the most important event in Dr. Travers' incumbency was the severance of what is now St. Mark's from its parent parish. It has been seen how in 1665 the district of the Stane or Lazar's Hill had been formally added to St. Andrew's. At that time it was but thinly 176 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY populated, and made no extravagant demand on the energies of the minister. But, as a glance at Brooking's map is sufficient to show, it had undergone in the interval a great expansion, and houses had everywhere sprung up. Accord- ingly it was thought desirable to relieve the old church of this charge, and by an Act of Parliament passed in 1708,^ which recited that the vicarage or parish of St. Andrew's was too large for its church, it was enacted that after the death, surrender, or promotion of Dr. Travers the parish should be divided, and that a parish to be called the parish of St. Mark's should be constituted, and a church erected on a site presented by one John Hansard, of Lazy Hill. Thus the parish of St. Andrew's reverted to its original dimensions, and from that time its limits have undergone no change.^ Dr. Travers survived this partition by twenty years, dying in 1727, and leaving by his will substantial bequests to the parish. He had held in addition to the vicarage the Chancellorship of Christ Church Cathedral. Dr. Travers' successor, the Bev. Bobert Dougatt, was a nephew of Archbishop King, by whom he had been appointed Archdeacon of Dublin, and through whose influence he was afterwards nominated to the precentorship of St. Patrick's, and the keepership of Marsh's library. Dr. Dougatt's ministry lasted only three years, and is noticeable chiefly as reviving the former connection between St. Andrew's and the cathedral in the person of its minister. It is curious that he was also appointed vicar of St. Mark's, notwith- standing the manifest intention of the recent Act of Parlia- ment to separate the cures. On Dr. Dougatt's death, in 1730, the Bev. Alexander Bradford commenced an incum- bency of thirty years, which, although the new vicar was not a man of special distinction, is remarkable from our present point of view as having witnessed the first formal acknowledgment of the existence of close official relations ' 6th Anne, cap. 21. ^ It is a curious circumstance that the Roman Catholic parish of St. Andrew's was constituted in the same year, 1708, which witnessed the severance of the district comprised in it from what still remains for civil purposes the parish of St. Andrew's. PARISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 177 between the parish of St. Andrew's and the Irish Parlia- ment. Neither the journals of Parliament nor the records of the parish inform us at what period the practice grew up under which the church of St. Andrew's came to be used as the place of worship of the Houses of Parliament on impor- tant public anniversaries. The Irish Parliament first met within the limits of the parish in 1661, when the first of the post-Kestoration Parliaments was opened at Chichester House. That building was in 1674 leased to the Crown by its then owner, Dr. John Parry, Bishop of Ossory, for the use of the Parliament. But inasmuch as the Viceroys of Charles II. summoned no second Parliament, from the dissolution- of the first one in 1666 to the end of the reign, it is impossible that the church, which was not completely built till 1673, could have been so utilised prior to the Kevolution. William III.'s Parliament of 1692 lasted for seven years, during all which time it continued to sit at Chichester House. But there is no evidence that the church was used for State purposes either during this Parliament, or during those called by Queen Anne and George I. ; and it is possible that the practice did not begin until after the demolition of Chichester House in 1728, and the erection of the new Parfiament House. But, at whatever precise date the custom originated, there is no doubt that for years before the first half of the eighteenth century had run its course, St. Andrew's had become the recognised place of worship of the two Houses, and that it had become customary for the House of Commons to attend in State on certain anniver- saries. The earliest recorded mention of such attendance is in 1733, when the Commons' Journal contains the entry, under date November 5, ' The House met in order to go to Church, and then adjourned till next day,' the occasion being of course the commemoration of Gunpowder Plot. The entry does not mention St. Andrew's but it was almost certainly the scene of the service ; for in the same month official recognition was given to the claims of St. Andrew's N 178 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY to be the parish church of Parhament, in connection with a petition by Dr. Bradford to be compensated for the loss of minister's money through the rebuilding of the Parliament House, and the consequent removal of several houses which were cleared for the purpose, and which had formerly contributed to the parochial assessment. At the instance of Mr. Wesley, afterwards the first Lord Morning- ton and grandfather of the Duke of Wellington,^ Parliament undertook to make good these losses, and to pay the assess- ment to the parish for the future. From this period allusions to the attendance of the House of Commons at St. Andrew's are frequent in the Journals. In the year 1745 there occur as many as three entries, in each of which the church is specially mentioned. On October 9 Kev. Dr. Marmaduke Phillips was desired to preach before the House of Commons at St. Andrew's Church, Dublin, on the 23rd of that month, being the anniversary thanksgiving day ' for the deliverance from the horrid rebellion which broke out in this kingdom on the 23rd day of October, 1641 ' ; and on the 24th Mr. Phillips received the thanks of the House for his excellent sermon on the occasion, and was requested to print the same. The Kev. Benjamin Barrington received a like command, and a like compliment, for a sermon on November 5 follow- ing. And on November 6, 1746, in a petition to Parliament for assistance in re-roofing the church, the parishioners prayed that, * inasmuch as the House doth on all public occasions resort to the said Church of St. Andrews, the House may please to take this Petition into consideration.' The committee to which the petition was referred held that the claim of the parish had been proved, and a sum of 5001. was accordingly voted in aid of the work. This was the first of a series of contributions by Parliament in aid of the repair or restoration of the fabric of the church, in all of which the position of the parish in relation to Parliament was freely acknowledged. And when in 1793 it was found ' Wesley's Dublin residence, Mornington House, still stood until quite recently in the parish. He was an active member of St. Andrew's vestry, as well as ot the House of Commons. PARISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 179 necessary to rebuild the church, the petition for help from the Commons besought ' such aid as will enable the Parishioners to accommodate the House in a manner suited to its dignity,' inasmuch as ' the House of Commons on public days compose a considerable part of the congregation.' That the House of Lords also occasionally attended appears from the language employed in an address presented in the same year to the Lord Chancellor, Lord FitzGibbon, after- wards Lord Clare, whose aid was solicited on the ground of his occasional presence in the church in his capacity as Speaker of the House of Lords. The closeness of the connection between Parliament and the parish is traced with great fulness in a petition presented to the House of Commons of the United Parliament on January 22, 1805, by Mr. Foster, the ex-Speaker of the Irish House of Commons, in which help was sought to enable the parish to complete the restoration of the church begun in 1793. This document opens with the assertion that ' Hitherto and until the Act of Union both the Houses of Parliament of Ireland were situate in the parish, to the Church of which the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons always resorted on public and solemn occasions.' It recalls the instances already enumerated of the extension of parliamentary patronage to the parish, and cites the reports of several Committees of the Irish House in 1796, 1798, and 1799, in which financial assistance was rendered on the express ground that the parish could not by its own exertions render the church fit for the reception of the parishioners and members of the House, The work of rebuilding the church was spread over a period of fourteen years. Commenced in 1793, the work was frequently interrupted for want of funds, notwithstanding contributions of 5001. and 1,000L respectively from Parlia- ment, and in 1798 was entirely suspended during the period of the Eebelliou. The original intention had been to rebuild the church de novo from the foundation on an entirely fresh design, and plans drawn by Mr. George Hartwell on this understanding were approved by the vestry. It was soon evident, however, that the funds for N 2 180 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY so extensive an undertaking could not be raised. It being ascertained that the old walls from below the level of the windows were in a perfectly sound condition, it was decided to retain the original shape ; and the ground plan of the Eound Church designed by William Dodson a hundred and thirty years earlier was thus preserved. Hartwell having resigned his commission as architect, the work was confided to Francis Johnston/ by whom the new front was designed. The interior arrangements, which all authorities concur in eulogising as extremely handsome and convenient in all respects, save as to the acoustic properties of the building, were carried out by the father of the celebrated novelist, Charles Lever. But even to this reduced scheme the resources of the parish were soon found to be inadequate, and it is doubtful whether the church would ever have been restored but for the munificence of the Imperial Parliament on the one hand and a fortunate windfall to the parish on the other. The petition already referred to, presented to the House of Commons at Westminster by Mr. Foster, was favourably entertained, and a sum of 6,0001. voted for the completion of the church. About the same time a suit which had been long in progress respecting the allocation of the sum paid into the hands of the trustees by the Wide Streets Com- missioners in respect of the old churchyard was brought to a conclusion, the parish establishing its title through the lapse of the lease formerly given to Sir William Fownes, and the funds being divided by decree of the Lord Chancellor between the vicar and the parish. The money thus made available was devoted to the building fund. So aided, the work was at last brought to a completion fourteen years after its inception, and the church opened for Divine Service on March 8, 1807, in the presence of the Viceroy and a distin- guished congregation. The total cost, inclusive of the organ, and of the fine statue of St. Andrew, which long stood over ' Johnston was also the architect under whose superintendence the additions to the Parliament House consequent on its conversion to its present uses were carried out by the Bank of Ireland. PAEISH CHUECH OF THE IKISH PAELIAMENT 181 the entrance, but which now in a much battered condition hes in a corner of the churchyard, amounted to 22,000^. Long before the building could be finished the Parliament, on whose honourable connection with which the parish of St. Andrew's will always pride itself, had disappeared. But for many years the church contained a valuable memorial of the days when it was the parish church of the Irish Parliament. Through the graceful act of the Viceroy, Lord Hardwicke, the parish was presented in 1802 with the handsome gilt candelabrum which had hung in the Irish House of Commons. This relic now adorns the examination hall of Trinity College, to which building it was fortunately transferred in view of some contemplated repairs to the roof of the church a year or two before the great fire of January 9, 1860, in which it must otherwise have perished. Apart from their interest in relation to the Irish Parlia- ment, the parish records of St. Andrew's illustrate life in Dublin during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Many particulars appear in them which throw light on the social condition of the city. The parochial regulations for the relief of the poor, especially a plan for lodging beggars according to the parishes to which they belonged, which is the subject of an animated paper in Dean Swift's miscel- laneous writings,^ occupy several entries. There are also many references to the mode of lighting the streets,^ to the ' ' A Proposal for giving Badges to the Beggars in all the Parishes of Dublin.' Swift's Works, ed. Sir Walter Scott, vii. p. 381. ^ The said Messrs. Stokes and Gregory did also acquaint the Vestry that in pursuance of the forementioned printed agreement of the Churchwardens they had caused between the 19th and 26th days of February last (1726) an ascertain- ment to be made upon an actual view and measurement of the number, dis- tances, and proportions of the Public Lamps in this parish, by which it was found that there was no public lamp erected in the places following, namely, Dermot's Lane, Lindsay's Row, St. Mark's Street, the Folly on Lazers Hill .... and of 165 public lanthorns or lamps in other places of this parish 135 were then (like as in all probability they had been before from the time of their erection and have been since) at illegal distances ; that is to say, each of the said 135 lamps was at a greater distance from y" next lamp than 22 yards in streets, considerable lanes and broad places, and than 33 yards in narrow bye lanes, courts and allies, and of the 165 lanthorns about 130 did not project 2^ feet from irons erected for that purpose.' — E.\tract from report to Select Vestry, 1726. 182 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOKY inefficiency of the watchmen, and the frequency of street outrages, and other like matters. But these and other topics, such as the contents of the parish registers, the eminent persons connected with the parish, and the charity sermons of Dean Kirwan, who preached some of his most eloquent sermons in St. Andrew's, are matters too purely local in their interest to be set forth here. Equally impossible is it to recall the story of St. Andrew's in the nineteenth century. But it is the less necessary to do so from the fact that by the close of the eighteenth century the parish had assumed very much of the appearance it presents nowadays. For though a succession of handsome banks and other buildings have altered the south side of Dame Street, the thoroughfares are in the main unchanged. From an archasological and antiquarian point of view the more recent history of the parish has no special claim on our attention ; while the one conspicuous parochial event for which the nineteenth century is memorable, is the de- struction of the old Kound Church by fire on the morning of Sunday, January 9, 1860.^ APPENDIX I DEAN ANDREWS AND STEAFFORD. Successful as was Dean Andrews in invoking Laud's aid in the rescue of St. Andrew's from desecration upon this occasion, he does not appear to have long retained the good opinion of his Grace of Canterbury. In a letter to Strafford, dated Oct. 20. 1634, on the subject of episcopal promotions, Laud refers to Andrews as follows : - 'I received a letter from the Dean of Limerick, Mr. George Andrews, that he might now succeed in the bishopric (of Limerick), but his letters came too late. ... I did formerly receive a letter from the Lords Justices of that Kingdom ' The existing building, which replaced the Round Church, was built at a cost of above lO.OOOZ. from the design of Messrs. Lanyon, Lyne, and Lanyon, of Belfast ; its foundation was laid by the Viceroy, Lord Carlisle, on August 11,1862; and it was consecrated on St. Andrew's Day, November 30, 1866. by Archbishop Trench, in presence of the Lord-Lieutenant, the Duke of Abercorn. ^ The correspondence will be found in Strafford's Letters, i. pp. 330-44. PAEISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 183 in Mr. Andrews' behalf, with a great testimony of his sufficiency/ and truly, my Lord, I should have done any reasonable thing for him upon their testimony, had not the thing been settled upon another. Now my thoughts do a little stagger, and by the letters which he hath sent me that staggering is occasioned ; I send you herein his letters, that you may see what fustian they are, but when you have read them, I pray you burn them (for I would not publicly disgrace him), and send me word in your next what esteem you have of the man for honesty and sufficiency.' The Dean's letters were doubtless duly destroyed ; but some idea of the nature of his offence may be gathered from a lengthened reference to his proceedings as chairman of a select committee of the Lower House of Convocation in Ireland, appointed to consider the canons of the Church of England, in which the Dean had the temerity to exhibit an independence of the High Church party little to the liking either of the imperious prelate or of the masterful Deputy. Strafford's report of the matter in a letter to Laud is as follows : ' The Popish Party growing extreme perverse in the Commons House, and the Parliament thereby in great danger to have been lost in a storm, had so taken up all my thoughts and endeavours that for live or six days it was not almost possible for me to take an account how business went among them of the Clergy. Besides, I reposed secure upon the Primate (Ussher) who all this while said not a word to me of the matter. At length I got a little time, and that most happily too, informed myself of the state of those affairs, and found that the Lower House of Convocation, had appointed a select Committee to consider the Canons of the Church of England, that they did proceed in the examination without con- ferring at all with their bishops, that they had gone through the Book of Canons, and noted in the margin such as they allowed with an A, and on others they had entered a D, which stood for Deliberandum ; that with the lafth Article they had brought the Articles of Ireland to be allowed and received under the pain of excommunication, and that they had drawn up their Canons into a body, and were ready that afternoon to make report in the Convocation. ' I instantly sent for Dean Andrews, that reverend clerk, who sat forsooth in the Chair at their Committee, requiring him to bring along the said foresaid Book of Canons so noted on the margin, together with the draught he was to present that afternoon to the ■•■ Andrews had been recommended to Laud in 1631 for the bishopric of Killaloe. — Lisviore Papers, 1st Ser., iii. p. 111. 184 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY House : this he obeyed, and herewith I send your Grace both the one and the other. 'But when I came to open the book, and run over their Dcliheraiidums in the margin, I confess I was not so much moved since I came into Ireland. I told him certainly not a Dean of Limerick, but an Ananias had sate in the chair of that Committee ; however sure I was Ananias had been there in spirit, if not in body, with all the fraternities and conventicles of Amsterdam. That I was ashamed and scandalised with it above measure. I therefore said he should leave the book and draught with me, and that I did command him upon his allegiance that he should report nothing to the House from that Committee till he heard again from me.' Strafford goes on to detail how he forthwith summoned a meeting of the committee together with several of the bishops, at which, after rebuking with characteristic vehemence ' the spirit of Brownism and contradiction ' he observed in their dclihcrandums, he forbade all discussion touching the articles of Ireland, and en- joined them to vote aye or no as to receiving the Articles of the Church of England. 'This meeting thus broke off,' Strafford concludes ; ' there were some hot spirits, sons of thunder, amongst them, who moved that they should petition me for a free Synod, but in fine they could not agree amongst themselves who should put the bell about the cat's neck, and so this likewise vanished.' To cross the Deputy was no light matter, and Andrews' ill- timed assertion of the independence of the Church of Ireland had like to have cost him the favour as well of Laud as of Strafford. His visions of preferment must certainly have faded but for the support of Ussher, and of Bramhall, then Bishop of Derry and Laud's chief adviser among the Irish bishops, who wrote recom- mending Dean Andrews as fit to be a bishop and ' a grave cathedral man.' ' Yielding to these influences, Strafford characteristically resolved to give the aspirant a kick upstairs. ' If your lordship thinks Dean Andrews hath been to blame,' he wrote to Laud, ' and that you would chastise him for it, make him Bishop of Ferns and Leighlin, to have it without any other commcndam than as the last bishop had it, and then I assure you he shall leave better behind him than wnll be recompensed out of that bishopric, which is one of the meanest of the whole Kingdom.' - Andrews accordingly received his promotion, and if we may judge by the Deputy's concluding reference to him all parties were satisfied. ' I con- ' Cal. Irish State Papers (1633-47), p. 89. - Strafford's Letters, i. p. 378, 18th March. 1634-5. PARISH CHURCH OF THE IRISH PARLIAMENT 185 ceive the Primate is well satisfied in Dean Andrews' translation to the bishopric of Ferns, and so is the man himself. Never any so well pleased, or so much desirous, I persuade myself, to take a rochet to loss as he. Had he not died a bishop he had been immemorial to posterity, where now he may be reckoned one of the worthies of his time. But the best jest is, now that he leaves the Deanery of Limerick, I find he hath let a lease very charitably to himself, contrary to the Act of State, which I will cause him to restore, and so make that deanery worth one [? over] three score pounds a year better than now it is, and furnish his lordship with an argument to move those to do the like to him that usurp the rights of the bishopric of Ferns. For he may truly say, " You see, gentle- men, my lord deputy spares none, he hath made even me myself, to restore a lease I held of the Deanery of Limerick, and if this be done to the green, what shall become of the dry? " ' ^ APPENDIX II THE SUCCESSION OF THE VICARS OF ST. ANDREW'S, DUBLIN, FROM THE RESTORATION. 1665. Richard Lingard, Dean of Lismore. 1670. Anthony Dopping, Bp. Kildare 1679, Meath 1681. 1678. Michael Hewetson, Archdeacon of Armagh 1693. 1693. John Travers. 1727. Robt. Dougatt, x\rchdeacon of DubUn. 1730. Alexander Bradford. 1750. Isaac Mann, Bp. Cork 1772. 1757. William Browne. 1784. Hon. John Hewitt, Dean of Cloyne. 1794. James Verschoyle, Bp. Killala 1810. 1798. Hon. Rd. Bourke, Bp. Waterford 1813. 1800. Chas. Mongan Warburton, Bp. Limerick 1806, Cloyne 1820. 1806. William Bourne. 1862. Ven. CadwalladerWolseley, Archdeacon of Glendalough. 1866. Wm. Marrable, D.D. 1900. Herbert Kennedy, B.D. ' For a full account of the proceedings of Convocation in 1634 in reference to the adoption of the English canons see Elrington's Life of Arch- bishop Ussher, pp. 165-88. See also Vesey's Life of Archbishop Bravihall. VII SOME ILLU8TBATI0NS OF THE CIVIC AND COMMERCIAL HISTORY OF DUBLIN IN THE SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES I. THE ORIGIN OF THE BALLAST OFFICE AND PORT AND DOCKS BOARD OF DUBLIN. Projects for the improvement of the harbour of Dublin and the better regulation of the shipping of the port appear to have been frequent in the last quarter of the seventeenth century. The fear lest the audacity of the Dutch and the defenceless condition of the environs should expose the capital to attack had led, in 1673, to Sir Bernard de Gomme's well-knov^n ' Survey of the city of Dublin and part of the harbour below Ringsend ' ; and although this survey was undertaken from purely military considerations, it naturally drew the attention of mercantile people to the deficiencies of the port from a commercial standpoint. The control of the port of Dublin was vested at this period in the citizens, by whom it had been exercised from the time of King John, when a royal charter had endowed the citizens ^ with one half of the water of the Liffey for fishing.- The Corporation does not appear to have paid close attention to that part of its responsibilities which concerned the harbour ; but in the year following De Gomme's visit their attention was called to the matter by the visit of Andrew Yarranton, an expert on harbour improvement.^ Yarranton, ' ' Medietatem aque de Auenelith ad piscandum ' is the language of the charter. Historic and Municipal DociLmcnts of Ireland, 1172-1320, p. 60. ^ The Mayor of Dublin anciently exercised, as Admiral of the Port of Dublin, a jurisdiction which appears to have extended from Skerries to Arklow, and the city was entitled to the customs of all merchandise within those limits. — Hali- day's Scandinavian Kingdom of Dubli7i, pp. 139 and 246. ' Ibid. p. 242. CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTORY OP DUBLIN 187 ' acquainting the Lord Mayor with his thoughts as to the making a very good harbour at Kingsend,' was ' importuned to bestow some time in a survey and discovery thereof,' and devoted three weeks to this task But though the survey was made no steps were taken by the citizens, and the first effort towards providing a proper machinery for the control of the port was left to private enterprise. In 1676 one Thomas Howard petitioned the Irish Privy Council for a patent for the provision of a Ballast Office in all the ports of Ireland. Howard's proposal stirred the city fathers to activity. Protesting against the petition, so far as it related to Dublin, as an encroachment on their civic rights, they appointed a committee to consider the erection of a Ballast Office, ' the profits whereof is intended for the King's Hospital,' and prayed the Lord-Lieutenant that no patent should pass to Howard. The protest of the citizens was effective, and Howard, though he had obtained a patent in England for the erection of a Ballast Office in Ireland, was unsuccessful in his application. Accordingly his next move was to petition the city, in association with his brother, for a lease of the port of Dublin at fifty pounds a year, in return for which Howard undertook to surrender his English patent. A lease for thirty-one years was granted ; but as the Howards took no step to perfect it, it was three years later declared void, and formal petition was made by the citizens for a patent to the city for a Ballast Office. The activity displayed on this as on the previous occasion was due to the exertion of a private individual who had taken up Howard's project. In the year 1697 one Captain Davison had made a proposal to the city to erect on or near the bar of Dublin a Lighthouse ^ forty feet above water, which should be enclosed with a small fort of thirty guns capable of defend- ing the harbour, and at the same time he proposed a Ballast Office ' by which ships should be supplied with ballast from such places only as should tend to the bettering the harbour.' ' Memorial about the Light House at Dublin. Brit. Museum, Add. MS. 21136, folio 82. Printed in Calendar of Dublin Records, vi. p. 609. 188 ILLUSTEATIONS OP IRISH HISTORY In 1700, having obtained the approval of the Dublin merchants and captains of ships trading there, and being encouraged by the Irish Government, Davison proceeded to London, and petitioned William III. for authority to proceed with the work, and for a grant of the Lighthouse and Ballast Office. His petition was referred to the Irish Lords Justices, who reported that the design was useful and ' absolutely necessary for the preserving the trade of the place ' ; but stated that the * city desired that the grant thereof might be made to them.' The Lords Justices accordingly recommended that, * lest it should be thought a business of clamour to grant such a thing away from a whole city,' the grant should be made to Davison as the instrument of the citizens. The matter was then referred to the Committee of the Privy Council for the affairs of Ireland, ' to investigate the claim of the several parties pretending to a right in the carry- ing on of this work,' several other persons having mean- time sought a patent. The Committee found the claims of Davison infinitely superior to those of all private rivals. But the city of Dublin alleging * several ancient charters by which they had title to the ground from whence the said ballast was proposed to be taken,' and having ' in the sitting of the last Parliament obtained a bill to be sent over for the establishment of a Ballast Office,' they recommended the claims of the citizens to her Majesty's favour in preference to those of any private persons. They at the same time expressed an opinion that, if the authority were given to the city of Dublin, Captain Davison should be employed on the work. No action appears to have been taken upon this report, and in 1702 Davison renewed his application,^ which was again opposed by the Dublin civic authorities as highly prejudicial to the city, and the project seems to have re- mained in abeyance for some years. In 1707, however, a petition under the city seal was ordered to be addressed to his Boyal Highness, Prince Gaorge of Denmark, Queen ' Calendar of Dublin Beccn-ds, vi. p. 272. CIVIC AND COMMERCIAL HISTORY OF DUBLIN 189 Anne's Consort, then Lord High Admiral of Great Britain and Ireland, for erecting a Ballast Office. This petition set forth that ' the port and river of Dublin are almost choked up, and are very unsafe by the irregular taking in and throw- ing out of ballast,' and besought favourable consideration for a fresh bill which had been sent over for erecting a Ballast Office, the petitioners being advised that without legislation no duty for the support of such office when erected could be imposed on shipping. The petition further averred that ' nothing can contribute more to the safety of the lives of seafaring men who resort hither than the mending of one of the most dangerous ports in her Majesty's dominions ' ; and in order to obviate the possibiHty of a grant to any private individual rather than to the city, it expressed the willingness of the assembly that all profits arising from the Ballast Office ' should be applied towards the maintenance of the poor boys in the Blue Coat Hospital in this city, whereby they are instructed in navigation to qualify them for her Majesty's sea service.' ^ In a letter from the Lord Mayor to Prince George, in furtherance of the city claim, it was also stated that the port was so unsafe that there was scarce depth of water left for a small vessel to ride, where some years before a man-of-war could safely anchor."'^ These applications were not favourably entertained by the Admiralty, Prince George of Denmark being of opinion that the erecting of a Ballast Office by Act of Parliament was a direct infringement of the rights of his office of Lord High Admiral. He therefore expressed his intention of opposing the bill.^ But his Koyal Highness, ' having a particular regard to the cleansing of the port of Dublin,' was content ' if the Lord Mayor would make proper application to him and to him only,' to grant a lease of a Ballast Office to the city of Dublin for a term of years, provided that the surplus of the port dues should be applied to the benefit of the Blue ' Calendar of Dublin Recwds, vi. pp. 374-5. '^ Ibid. p. 616. '■' Letter of Josiah Burchett, Secretary to the Admiralty. Calendar of Dublin Eecoids, vi. p. 618. 190 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY Coat School in the manner already mentioned. The objec- tions thus raised by the Admiralty were combated in a very vigorous letter addressed to Lord Sunderland, the Secretary of State, in vs^hich it was pointed out that the sand and soil whence the ballast was to be taken were the inheritance of the city of Dublin, which by several charters had the jurisdiction of the Admiralty granted to it. Not- withstanding this, the city, they added, would be willing to waive all such rights and take a lease from the Lord High Admiral, were it not that powers under an Act of Parlia- ment were absolutely necessary, as a means of obviating the difficulty raised by Prince George, to enforce payment of harbour dues. In token of the readiness of the city to admit the claims of the Admiralty, an offer was made on the part of the Corporation to add to the bill a clause saving the Admiralty jurisdiction, by providing in the following quaint terms for the city's ' yielding and paying therefor and thereout to his Koyal Highness, Prince George of Denmark, Lord High Admiral of Great Britain, and to his successors, Lord High Admirals of the same, one hundred yards of best Holland duck, that shall be made or manufactured within the realm of Ireland, at the Admiralty Office of London on every first day of January for ever hereafter.' ^ The solution thus proposed was accepted by the Admiralty, and the heads of the bill having been approved in England, there was passed through the Irish Parliament in 1707 the Statute of the 6th Anne, chapter 20, entitled, ' An Act for Cleansing the Port, Harbour, and River of Dublin, and for erecting a Ballast Office in the said City.'^ II. THE OEIGIN OF THE DUBLIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. In the account given by Sir John Gilbert in his ' History of Dublin ' of the origin of the Royal Exchange (now the City Hall), mention is made of an association of merchants formed ' Calendar of Dublin Records, vi. p. 621. ^ A minute-book acquired in 1902 by the Royal Irish Academy contains the record of the steps first taken to put this Act in motion, and must form the materials for the first chapter in any history of the Ballast Office, or of its successor, the Port and Docks Board. CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTORY OF DUBLIN 191 to resist the exactions of one Thomas Allen, who, having been appointed in the year 1763 to the office of Taster of Wines, endeavoured to enforce for his own advantage a fee of two shillings per tun on all wines and other liquors imported into Ireland. The struggle against this arbitrarj^ tax did not, according to the authority quoted by Gilbert, last long ; ' and turning their thoughts to the best mode of applying the redundant subscriptions raised to conduct the opposi- tion,' the members unanimously adopted the idea of erecting a commodious building for the meeting of merchants and traders. A site having been fixed upon, the purchase-money, 13,000/., was obtained from Parliament by the zeal and activity of Dr. Lucas, then one of the city representatives. The building so erected was the Eoyal Exchange, of which the foundation stone was laid in 1769. It was opened ten years later.^ No record exists of the circumstances under which Dublin Chamber of Commerce was founded, and in- quiries recently instituted regarding its origin show that, save in so far as they are contained in the * Rough Minute- Book ' of the Committee of Merchants, acquired by the Eoyal Irish Academy in 1902, those circumstances cannot now be traced. For although the Chamber of Commerce still possesses among its records the first minute-book of the Chamber, that volume "throws no light upon the mode in which the Chamber of Commerce was first constituted. It is to the proceedings of the Committee of Merchants, by whom the building of the Exchange was promoted and conducted, that the ' Rough Minute-Book ' relates ; and the record shows that the committee not only performed for many years many of the functions now discharged by the Chamber of Commerce, but was the actual parent of that institution.^ ' Gilbert's Histcn-y of Dublin, ii. p. 56. - The Minutes of the Chamber begin with an entry dated March 18, 1783, which records the calling of a meeting for March 22 ensuing to elect a Pre- sident, two Vice-Presidents, and a Treasurer, and to determine on the duties of a Secretary. And the next entry duly announces the election of those officers, and the appointment of one William Shannon as Secretary at an annual salary of 30i. But of the circumstances leading up to these proceedings no trace remains. The ' Rough Minute-Book ' of the Committee of Merchants not only unexpectedly supplies the lost details, but incidentally gives us a very interest- ing chapter in the history of the mercantile development of Dublin. 192 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY The minute-book opens with the record of a resolution ' that the ground for building an Exchange be convej^ed to the Corporation of the Guild of Merchants, and the planning of the building and the carrying into execution of the Ex- change conducted by a committee of certain citizens therein named, together with fifteen wholesale merchants, freemen of the Guild of Merchants to be chosen by the wholesale freemen of the Guild Merchants from among themselves.' The earlier entries in the book are concerned with the steps taken to raise funds for the erection of the Exchange, the money voted by Parliament being absorbed by the cost of the site. These funds were for the most part obtained by means of lotteries. On February 23, 1768, it was resolved ' that a scheme be grafted on the State Lottery now depend- ing in England in order to raise a further sum towards the ex- pense of erecting an Exchange on the reserved ground on Cork Hill, and that an advertisement for that purpose be published in due time in all the Dublin papers, except the Gazette.' The minute-book is crowded with entries, between the dates 1768 and 1778, relating to the progress of the building, in- cluding a resolution of February 24, 1769, for the payment of the bills ' for the expenses of entertaining the Lord-Lieu- tenant on the occasion of his laying the foundation stone, notwithstanding the Committee are of opinion they are ex- ceedingly extravagant.' The bills amounted to 298^. 13s. l^d. But the Committee of Merchants were concerned with topics more serious than these. They busied themselves from the first in such matters as the procuring an amend- ment in the Irish Bankruptcy Laws, in movements for the direct importation of spirits from the British plantations without first landing them in Great Britain, and other ques- tions directly affecting the commercial interests of Ireland. That they also took a lively interest in the mercantile development of their own city is evident from the space devoted in their records to such topics as the building of the new Custom House, and a proposal for erecting Law Courts in College Green. Both of these projects were opposed by the merchants on the ground that they tended to shift the CIVIC AND COMMERCIAL HISTOEY OF DUBLIN 193 commerce of Dublin from its old centre in the neighbour- hood of Essex Quay. The latter scheme was especially obnoxious as tending ' to the erection of a bridge east of Essex Bridge ' ; and the former was formally condemned as ' extremely injurious to the interests of thousands of individuals, and highly prejudicial to the commerce of this city in general.' * It is interesting to note that the erection of the former Custom House had two generations earlier led to similar complaints. But the objections of the merchants were, of course, unavailing. The Commissioners of Revenue pointed out that the increase of building had been of late so rapid that the town, which formerly terminated to the west at Essex Bridge, was now divided by that structure into equal parts, east and west, that the eastern portion had no communication across the river save by ferries, and that as the city must naturally continue to develop in an easterly direction, they would be highly blamable in preventing such a commimication in the future. The merchants, however, did not surrender without a struggle ; they interviewed the Viceroy, petitioned Parliament, and invoked the aid of the merchants of London ; and they voted gold snuff-boxes to two London merchants who had interested themselves in promoting opposition among the traders of the English capital. The result of their efforts was to retard the erection of the new Custom House for about ten years. But in 1781 the Commissioners of Eevenue were at length empowered to build the Custom House on the site so much objected to, and although at a public meeting, summoned by the merchants under the presidency of the Lord Mayor, a further petition was ordered to be presented to the Viceroy by the members for the city, Mr. Clements and Sir Samuel Bradstreet, the protest was unavailing. The Custom House was built where it still stands, Carlisle (now O'Connell) ' On Dec. 30, 1773, it was resolved : — ' That the removal of the Custom House below Temple Lane slip will tend to draw the inhabitants of the city further down the river, and so furnish a pretext for building a bridge to the east of Essex Bridge, which would be still more injurious to private property, to trade, and to navigation than even the removal of the Custom House.' — Extract from Minute-Book. O 194 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY Bridge became an immediate necessity, and the develop- ment of the city to the east and south-east at once pro- ceeded apace. It was probably a sense of the deficient authority of the Merchants' Committee, as revealed by the failure of their opposition to the Custom House scheme, which led to the institution of the more formal organisation of a Chamber of Commerce. The change may also have been hastened by an investigation into the conduct of the lotteries held by the Committee, which appears to have provoked some scandal, though no proofs of fraud were established. It is certain, at all events, that little more than a year later the Committee was convened to meet at the Royal Exchange on February 10, 1783, for the special purpose of taking into considera- tion a 'Plan for instituting a Chamber of Commerce in this city.' Resolutions affirming this plan were at once adopted, and the Committee of Merchants, after a useful and interesting existence of exactly fifteen years, merged in the Chamber of Commerce of Dublin. Although it is not the province of this paper to further pursue the history of the Chamber of Commerce, it appears desirable, inasmuch as that history has never been written, to note the steps which were taken to provide the new association with a formal, constitution pursuant to the resolution just chronicled. One month after the final meet- ing of the Committee of Merchants a ballot was held for the election of a Council of forty-one members.^ One hundred and fifty-three persons appear to have voted, and Mr. Travers Hartley, long the most active member of the old Committee, who had been for many years a representative of Dublin in the College Green Parliament as a follower of Grattan, was returned at the head of the list. At a further meeting, held on March 22 for the election of officers, Mr. Hartley was elected President of the Chamber — a position which he appears to have held continuously down to 1788. In that year rules were drawn up for the annual election of officers of the Chamber, but no election under these rules is ' Minutes of Chamber of Commerce. CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTOEY OP DUBLIN 195 recorded in the minute-book, which is a blank from March 29, 1788, to 1805, except for a single entry in 1791. Whether or not the Chamber met during this long interval does not certainly appear ; but from the fact that the first minute-book in the possession of the Chamber of Commerce is indexed as * Old Chamber,' and that what is referred to as the * second ' Chamber began to sit in 1805, it may be assumed that the Chamber as originally started failed to meet for several years, and was, in fact, during a period of seventeen years a less efficient guardian of mercantile interests than the old Committee of Merchants which it had replaced had proved. The minute-book ends with 1807. No records exist of any meetings from that year until 1820, when the Chamber appears to have been reconstituted ; and it is doubtful for how many years its proceedings were sus- pended. From 1820 the manuscript records have been preserved in perfect sequence. The printed reports of the Chamber date from 1821. III. THE ALDERMEN OF SKINNER'S ALLEY. There have lately been deposited in the National Museum of Ireland certain of the paraphernalia and other relics of an ancient Dublin association, which, after an existence of above two centuries, has practically ceased to exist. Long one of the most influential of political associations in the capital, the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley have of late years so passed out of sight as to have become almost unknown, even by name, to all but the old and grey among the citizens of Dublin. There is no occasion to lament the disappearance of a society which, whatever its uses in former ages, was latterly of no practical significance save as recalling a phase of political and religious fanaticism which has long become obsolete, or nearly so. But advantage may be taken of an incident which may be held to mark the practical demise of this venerable association to furnish in the form of an obituary notice some account of the origin and history of the ' Ancient and Loyal Society of Aldermen of Skinner's Alley.' Though no formal history of the ' Ancient and Loyal o 2 196 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Society of Aldermen of Skinner's Alley ' has ever been com- piled, readers of Sir Jonah Barrington's well-known 'Personal Sketches of my Own Time ' will recollect the chapter devoted to the Aldermen by that sprightly, if somewhat unveracious, chronicler of eighteenth century Ireland. Though there are some passages in Sir Jonah's account of the society, of which he was himself for many years a member, which are obviously not meant to be taken seriously, the explanation there given of the origin of the society is sufficiently accu- rate for quotation. It runs as follows : ' After William III. had mounted the English throne, and King James had assumed the reins of government in Ireland, the latter monarch annulled the then existing charter of the Dublin Corporation, dismissed all the aldermen who had espoused the revolutionary cause, and replaced them by others attached to himself. The deposed aldermen, however, had secreted some little articles of their paraphernalia, and privately assembled in an alehouse in Skinner's Alley, a very obscure part of the capital.^ Here they continued to hold anti-Jacobite meetings ; elected their own lord mayor and officers, and got a marble bust of King WilHam, which they regarded as a sort of deity. These meetings were carried on till the battle of the Boyne put William in possession of Dublin, when King James's Aldermen were immediately cashiered, and the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley re-invested with their mace and other Aldermanic glories. To honour the memory of their restorer, therefore, a permanent associa- tion was formed, and invested with all the memorials of their former disgrace and latter reinstatement.' ^ Although the Aldermen at no time in their history had any direct association with the more modern Orange Society, Barrington is not far wrong in describing them as in effect 'the first Orange Association ever formed.' They were organised on a basis exclusively Protestant, and their primary object was the promotion of the principles of the ' Glorious Ke volution ' of 1688 and the perpetuation of the • Skinner's Alley ran between Weaver's Square and the Coombe. * Barrington's Personal Sketches, edited by Townsend Young, i. pp. 134-5. CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTOEY OF DUBLIN 197 constitution in church and state as established at the ac- cession of William III. Their animating principle cannot, indeed, be better indicated than by quoting the terms of the charter toast, as published in the rules and regulations of the society printed in 1871 : * The glorious, pious, and immortal memory of the Great and Good King William III., who saved us from Popery, slavery, arbitrary power, brass money, and wooden shoes, per- mitted all debtors to walk abroad on Sundays, and left us his best legacy, " The House of Hanover," which may God in His great mercy bless and preserve, so long as they will faithfully maintain and uphold the British Constitution, as established at the Revolution of Sixteen Hundred and Eighty-eight.' Barrington gives a version of this toast more grotesque in its terms, but not essentially different.' At the time when Sir Jonah joined the Aldermen this society had existed for a full century, acquiring, as he states, considerable influence and importance. It continued to be recruited from the members of the old corporation and the Protestant freemen of the city of Dublin. But though thus Protestant and constitutional in their prejudices, the Aldermen were not devoid of national sympathies, nor un- influenced by the ideals to which Grattan appealed. It is an odd, but striking illustration of the revolution of senti- ment which a century has witnessed, that a society with such opinions as are embodied in the toast just quoted should have numbered amongst its members a patriotic demagogue so unimpeachably national as the celebrated Napper Tandy. Though Sir Jonah does not say so, it is probable that the opinions of the Aldermen in 1800 were identical with those of Speaker Foster, and other eminent members of the patriotic party in the Irish Parliament, who based their opposition to the Union exclusively on Protestant grounds. Though most of the relics of this ancient society date from about the middle of the eighteenth century, the extant records of the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley, mifortunately, ' Personal Sketches, i. p. 13G. 198 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY do not extend further back than the early years of the nine- teenth.^ The ' Eules and Eegulations ' already referred to appear, however, to embody the traditional procedure of the Aldermen at their meetings and festivals. Except that the chief official is described in the rules as ' His Excellency the Governor,' instead of the Lord Mayor, the official account of the society agrees in the main with Barrington's description. In addition to the governor, the officers comprised a deputy- governor, a lord high treasurer, a secretary, a sword-bearer, and a mace-bearer. Meetings were held on the 4th of each month, and on the 4th of November in each year the anniversary of the birthday of William III. was invariably celebrated by a banquet. At this feast the principal dish was one of sheep's trotters, in allusion, according to Har- rington, to James II. 's inglorious flight after the Bojue. While the general object and ideals of the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley remained unchanged through the course of two centuries, the society appears to have assumed, in the latter half of its existence, political functions of a specific kind. In the printed rules the Aldermen are represented as composed of ' an unlimited number of members, being Protestant, who shall consent to be bound by the rules, obligations, and qualifications of the society, and who shall be registered parliamentary electors of the City of Dublin.' The last clause points to the function which ultimately gave to the Aldermen their chief importance. The society became in effect an electioneering organisation. Kecruited in the main from the ranks of the freemen of the city, it became, under the franchise as it existed after the Eeform Act of 1832, an important factor in all contested elections in the metropolis, and was a principal prop and pillar of Dubhn Toryism in the now remote days when the members for the city, county, and university of Dublin were uniformly Con- servative, and were toasted as ' the Dublin Six.' The surviving records of the Aldermen consist for the ' In Whitelaw and Walsh's History of Dublin, p. 1069, it is stated that a schism rent the society about the close of the eighteenth century, when one party kept the paraphernalia and the other the records. Hence, no doubt, the lack of any early minutes. CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTOEY OF DUBLIN 199 most part of a parchment roll, containing the signatures of members admitted to the society from the year 1825, and a minute-book of proceedings, which commences in 1841. The form of these records, though comparatively modern, preserves the terms of the impressive exordium which it was customary for the governor to address to each new member before signing the roll, wherein the novice was admonished to declare his allegiance to * our unequalled constitution in Church and State.' The roll contains a large number of names eminent in Dublin annals, and a few of still wider fame. Among them are those of Sir Edward Grogan and Sir William Gregory, sometime Conservative members for the City of Dublin. But its most remarkable curiosity, in view of subsequent events, quite comparable for the incon- gruity between the principles of the Aldermen and the subsequent opinions of the new member to the enrolment of Napper Tandy half a century earlier, is the signature which establishes the adhesion of Isaac Butt, the founder of the Home Kule movement, to the tenets of the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley. The minute-book covers the history of the Aldermen for a period of about a quarter of a century, commencing on November 4, 1841. This was a year of much political excitement in Dublin, and of serious moment to the Alder- men of Skinner's Alley, as the successors of the ancient Protestant corporation. The Municipal Corporations Act, which had just passed, had transformed the city fathers from a close Protestant and Tory oligarchy to a body largely Liberal and Koman Catholic, and to the horror of these staunch upholders of the ' glorious, pious, and immortal memory,' Daniel O'Connell was placed in the Lord Mayor's chair. A glance at the minutes of the Aldermen's proceed- ings in the days immediately succeeding municipal reform brings home very vividly the immensity of the changes which have been wrought within a space of no more than sixty years in the domestic politics of Ireland. An example may be cited from them which, though not intrinsically more characteristic than several other illustrations which 200 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY might be selected, has the piquancy which attaches to the associations of eminent and famihar figures. The names of Sir WilHam Gregory and Isaac Butt were mentioned a moment ago as among the signatories to the roll of Aldermen. Almost the earliest entries in this minute- book are concerned with the once celebrated Dublin election of 1842, at which the future Governor of Ceylon was returned for the city in the Tory interest, largely through the exer- tions of the future father of the Home Kule movement. Sir "William Gregory, despite his unimpeachably Conservative antecedents, was, as his memoirs show, very much more of a Whig than a Tory in his natural proclivities. He has left in his ' Autobiography ' an account of his uncomfortable sensations while submitting to the aggressively Protestant championship of some of the more outspoken of his sup- porters. By none of them was he more severel}^ tried than by Butt, of whom he has left a reminiscence strangely at variance with the Irish leader's later career. ' Among the extreme partisans distinguished by the virulence of their language and uncompromising hostility to Eoman Catholics as well as to their religion, were a Protestant clergyman, the Rev. Tresham Gregg, and Professor Butt, of Trinity College. They were both admirable mob orators, and they got the steam up with a vengeance Butt was at that time the extreme of the extremes in all rehgious ques- tions, the very type of ultra-domineering, narrow-minded Protestant Ascendancy.' That this is no great exaggeration of Butt's position and opinions at this time is sufficiently apparent from the terms of the following resolution, recorded in the minute-book as having been moved by him at an ' aggregate meeting ' of the Protestant Freemen of Dublin, convened in support of Gregory's candidature by the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley : ' That fully satisfied with the Protestant and Constitu- tional principles of our respected friend, William Gregory, Esq., and satisfied that he will in Parliament pursue a bold and uncompromising spirit of Protestant principles in all their integrity, as well as preserve the Freemen of the City CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL IIISTOEY OF DUBLIN 201 of Dublin in the exercise of their rights handed down to them for centuries by their forefathers, and assembled under the auspices of this ancient body, associated with so many recollections of the perils and fideHties of their ancestors, we unite, and with one heart and mind resolve to support him at the next election as a candidate worthy of a cause with which such recollections are associated.' Gregory was duly elected on this occasion, but he was unable to live up to the expectations of his Protestant sponsors. At the general election of 1847 his Peelite pro- chvities and obvious lack of zeal on the religious question lost him the support of the ' Aldermen,' and he was de- feated by the then well-known demagogue, John Eeynolds. A resolution moved after the election at a meeting of the Aldermen sufficiently explains his rejection, and indicates the extraordinary tenacity with which, even as recently as 1847, the principles of the 'Protestant Eevolution ' were still cherished in DubHn : ' This ancient Society, the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley, being an essentially Protestant Body pledged to maintain the principles of the British Constitution as settled in 1688, and, consequently, the ascendancy of Protestant truth and the extirpation of Popish error, the members being bound in conscience by their declaration of adherence to its Charter to carry out those principles as their judgment shall dictate, be it resolved that our late representative, William Gregory, Esq., having abandoned those principles of high Protestantism, for the ex- pression of which he was supported by this Society, it was competent for any member of this body to oppose to the utmost the return of that gentleman.' The successive extensions of the franchise, which first reduced and ultimately destroyed the once dominant influ- ence of the Protestant Freemen of Dubhn, struck a fatal blow at the prestige of the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley. Since 1885 the society has waned to practical extinction, and though never formally dissolved it is most unlikely that it will ever be effectively revived. Not many citizens of Dublin would nowadays be found wilHng to avow the 202 ILLUSTRATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY perfervid Protestantism of this ancient body, nor would the most convinced champions of Reformation doctrines now endeavour to justify them by an appeal to ' Revolution ' principles. But though its raison d'etre has long ceased to exist, the society has a distinct interest for the historian of the development of opinion in Ireland. And the sidelight which is thrown by the episode of Sir William Gregory's election upon the early career of Isaac Butt is of value as enabling us to understand the evolutionary process, which might otherwise appear incomprehensible, by which some of the most earnest of Irish Conservatives were led to embrace the notion of an Irish Parliament in Dublin as a protest against the disestablishment of the Church of Ireland by the British Parliament at Westminster. No account of the Aldermen of Skinner's Alley could be considered complete which omitted to refer to the Charter Song of the Society, which is accordingly appended. The authorship is commonly credited to Mr. Hardinge Giffard. CHAETEE SONG. Tune — ' Maggie Lauder.'' When Tyranny's detested power Had leagued with Superstition, And bigot James, in evil hour, Began his luckless mission. Still here survived the sacred flame ; Here Freedom's Sons did rally. And consecrate to deathless Fame The Men of Skinner's-alley. When William came to set them free From famine, lire, and slaughter, And the first dawn of Liberty Had blushed on the Boyne Water — Then did tliey fill to Glorious Will, At such a toast who'd dally. While Liberty and Loyalty Exist in Skinner's-alley. And here, through each revolving day, The sacred flame was cherished, Though lost in Faction's fearful fray, It once had nearly perished ; Until our Fathers' spirit rose. While knaves stood shilly-shally : Then did we sing, God save the King, We Men of Skinner's-alley. CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTOKY OF DUBLIN 203 And oft may we repeat that toast, By festive draughts elated, While loyalty, our proudest boast, On every heart is seated ; For ne'er can we forget the King, Round whom all virtues rally, The memory of William III. shall ring Each night in Skinner's-alley. IV. THE OUZEL GALLEY SOCIETY. At the end of the seventeenth century, in the closing years of the reign of Wilham III., a vessel known as the ' Ouzel,' in the ownership of a Dublin merchant, and engaged, it is believed, in the Smyrna trade, sailed from Ringsend for the Levant. Prior to her departure she had been insured against risks, with Dublin underwriters, in the usual way. In the ordinary course her absence would have been a lengthened one ; but when, after a lapse of some years, nothing had been heard of her, she was assumed to have been lost at sea with all hands. The owners duly claimed their insurance-money, which was paid by the underwriters ; the ship was deemed to have made her last voyage ; and the commercial transactions in respect of her were regarded as finally closed. But it fell out that not very long afterwards, to the astonishment of all concerned, the ' Ouzel Galley ' cast anchor in the port of Dublin. The captain had a strange tale to tell. Proceeding in her eastern course down the Mediterranean, the ' Ouzel ' had fallen a victim to the Algerine corsairs, who in those days, and, indeed, for long after, were still the scourge of the mercantile marine. Being a large and well-found ship, she had been appro- priated by her captors to their own uses. But by some fortunate chance the crew of the ' Ouzel ' were enabled to turn the tables on their conquerors, to repossess themselves of their ship and its cargo, and to return in safety to the port from whence they had sailed. So far all was for the best. But the return of the ' Ouzel,' unfortunately, proved the occasion of a knotty legal difficulty involving troublesome litigation, which in one form or another lasted for several years. The ' Ouzel ' brought 204 ILLUSTEATIONS OP IRISH HISTOEY home in her hold not alone the peaceful merchandise which it was her mission to carry, but the piratical spoils of her sometime Algerine masters. This loot was of a value far exceeding that of the legitimate cargo, and immensely in excess of the amount for which the ship had been insured, and for which the owners had been compensated. A question at once arose as to the ownership of the plunder. Was the booty the property of the original owners under whose auspices it had been gained ? Or did it pass to the underwriters in virtue of their completion of the contract of indemnity? The point was a nice one, which apparently had not then been settled, and the gentlemen of the law courts exerted their ingenuity in the endeavour to determine the destination of so rich a prize. No records of this litiga- tion are now traceable ; but it is reputed to have engaged the Courts for years without any result being reached ; and the case was ultimately referred to the arbitration of a committee of merchants, through whom a compromise was effected, and the litigation terminated. To celebrate this triumph of the elastic principle of arbitration over the unaccommodating and dilatory procedure of the Courts, the merchants of Dublin resolved to found a society which should have for its object the settlement of all commercial disputes without having recourse to the winding mazes of the law ; and they gave to their association the name of the vessel which had been the means of bringing it into being. Accordingly, about the year 1705, the Ouzel Galley Society was founded. The books of the proceedings of the society for the first half-century of its existence have long been irrecoverably lost, and only the more recent minute-books are now extant. But its rules and regulations, with a list of members, were printed in 1859, as collected from the books of proceedings which were then available. These rules and regulations include the report of a committee of the society appointed in 1799, ' to inquire into and prepare a declaration of the rules, orders, and customs of the Galley.' We are thus enabled to understand the precise objects of the society and CIVIC AND COMMEKCIAL HISTORY OF DUBLIN 205 the mode in which it was organised. From this it appears that it was the duty of all members of the Galley to sit as arbitrators in the settlement of such disputes as might be referred to them, ' provided all the arbitrators chosen are members of the Galley.' Parties were prohibited from making any personal applications to members respecting any matter in dispute, and all proceedings were regulated under the guidance of an officer known as the Registrar, to whom a sum of money, arranged according to a fixed scale, was payable by the parties seeking arbitration, ' to insure the payment of the Galley Fees,' which were appropriated, after payment of the costs of the award, to a charitable fund. Within the limits of the society parties were entitled to the choice of their arbitrators, but with the arbitrators when chosen lay the appointment of an umpire. Such were the purposes for which the society was formally constituted ; but it had, or grew to have, other functions, at once benevolent and convivial, which appear in time to have engrossed a large share of the attention of its members. From the year 1770 the subscription appears to have been a guinea ; but on November 11, 1801, ' it appear- ing by the bursar's accounts that the subscription of one guinea per annum is insufficient to pay the annual dinners,' it was raised to a guinea and a half. Two years later, no doubt for the same reason, it was raised to 'U. 5s. 6d. ; and the frequent occurrence of the word ' dinner ' in its rules may, perhaps, be held to account for the mourning accents with which surviving members long continued to speak of this ancient society. Most of the business of the society was transacted at or after dinner, except at the November meeting, which was held immediately before dinner. Certain it is, at all events, that while continuing to perform its more serious functions, the Ouzel Galley Societj^ became highly popular among the merchants of Dublin as a convivial association. Its roll being limited to forty members, admission to it was highly prized. The list of its members for a period of a hundred and forty years contains, it is no exaggeration to say, representatives of all that is most honourable in mercantile 206 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOKY Dublin, and attests the high character the society continuously enjoyed. The names of La Touche, Guinness, Hone, Pirn, Jameson, Hartley, Colvill, and others equally familiar con- stantly recur. But the growing element of conviviality did not entirely divert the minds of the members from more serious objects. Like the Corporation and the public institutions of the Irish capital at the time, they were in full sympathy with Henry G rattan's assertion of the parliamentary liberties of Ireland. On April 16, 1782, the society unanimously re- solved ' that the King, Lords and Commons of Ireland are solely competent to make laws for the government thereof.' The esteem in which the society was borne, and the hold it had on the affections of its members, were strength- ened by the quaint and characteristic customs which its constitution ordained and its rules enforced. It was organised, in deference to its marine origin, on a nautical basis. The affairs of the Ouzel Galley were administered by a Council, of which the ofi&cers were : — * The captain, two lieutenants, master, bursar, boatswain, gunner, carpenter, master's mate, coxswain, boatswain's mate, and carpenter's mate ' ; and a peremptory regulation enacted that at the meet- ings of the Galley, of which three were held annually, ' the captain, or in his absence the senior officer on board, has supreme command, and any disobedience to him is mutiny.' The introduction of officers and new members was conducted * according to the ancient and immemorial usage of the Galley,' part of the ceremony being, it is understood, the draining, at a single draught, of a bumper of claret from the society's glass cup, a beautiful example of Irish glass-work. Guests could only be introduced on the invitation of the ' captain, officers, and crew of the Ouzel Galley.' At each meeting members were bound, on pain of a fine, to wear a gold medal ^ pendant ' The records of the society for Feb. 13, 1772, contain the following : ' Ordered, that the medal be made of gold. That on one side of the medal the " Ouzel Galley " be represented, and the motto " Steady." That on the reverse be represented the figure of "Equity," with the motto " cuique suum." ' These medals appear to have been struck at different periods. That acquired by the Academy is believed to be from the design of Parks, a Dublin CIVIC AND COMMEECIAL HISTORY OF DUBLIN 207 from an orange ribbon. Finally, the members were ' piped to dinner ' with a boatswain's whistle ; and the minutes for 1754 record that a silver whistle was ordered to be provided by the carpenter for the boatswain's use.^ That at these convivial meetings the charitable objects associated with them were by no means ignored appears from the regulation that the bursar should keep two accounts, one for the Subscription Fund and the other for the Charitable Fund ; and from the fact that after such dinner it was customary to vote away in charity the earnings of the Galley. It is certain that the Society enjoyed throughout its existence a high reputation for practical benevolence. The meetings of the Ouzel Galley Society were held through- architect. Many citizens of Dublin are familiar with the large painting of a full-rigged ship which hangs over the door of the news-room in the Chamber of Commerce, with the legend, ' The Ouzel Galley,' beneath it. A similar repre- sentation of a full-rigged ship appears carved in stone above the exit door from the Commercial Buildings leading to the river. It seems right that in this notice of the society the pedigree of this painting should be preserved so far as it can be collected from the records of the society. The painting appears to have been presented to the society as far back as 1752 by Alderman John Macarrell, the then captain of the Galley. Whether it was a merely fancy picture, or an authentic representation of the actual ship from which the society took its name, cannot be stated, for nothing further is known of the date of the picture or of the artist. In the minutes of the meeting of the Galley held at Chapelizod in August 175.3, a receipt is inserted, in which one .John Morris acknowledges the receipt of ' a large painted piece representing the Ouzel Galley, which is put up in the great room in my house,' and admits the picture to be the property of the Galley. Morris was probably the owner of the inn or tavern in which the society was then in the habit of meeting. Nineteen years later, July 16, 1772, the minutes record the appointment of a committee ' to inquire after and recover the picture of the Galley presented to the society by Alderman Macarrell,' but the result of the inquiry is not given in any subsequent minute. It may be presumed, however, that the picture was recovered, and is identical with that which still hangs in the Chamber of Commerce, and is thus referred to in the entry for June 3, 1870 : ' That the offer of the Chamber of Commerce to place the old painting of the Galley in a more conspicuous place be accepted.' ' The captain's oath, in 1754, was as follows : — ' I, .4. £., do swear that I will be faithful to our Sovereign Lord King George the Second ; and this galley, entrusted to my command, I will, to the best of my power, defend against all pirates either by sea and land ; the rules and orders established on board I will see observed to the utmost of my power, and justice administered to the crew, and all who put any freight on board. I will continue to be a good fellow, and, as long as I can, hearty and merry.' 208 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY out the nineteenth century at the Commercial Buildings, and many still recall these gatherings which each November were held in the open square behind the Chamber of Com- merce. In the latter part of the eighteenth century, and for many years subsequently, the dinners appear to have been held at Atwell's Tavern in Dame Street.^ From the foregoing account, it is easy to understand that a society of this kind must in time have outgrown the circum- stances in which it originated. Though as a benevolent as- sociation it continued to serve a useful purpose, its functions as an institution for promoting arbitration gradually fell into desuetude, as legal procedure adapted itself more closely to the needs of the mercantile community. From a printed account of awards made in each year from 1799 to 1869, it appears that 364 awards, many of them dealing with matters of great magnitude, were made within that period. But of these nearly two-thirds were made in the first quarter of the nineteenth century. In 1888, accordingly, the Ouzel Galley was voluntarily wound up and dissolved by an order of the Court of Chancery, which provided for the distribution of its funds, to the amount of 3,3001., among charitable insti- tutions connected with the city in which the Society had so long flourished. - • The meeting-places of the society, as recorded in their Transactions, throw interesting light on the taverns or eating-houses of Dublin and its environs, in the second half of the eighteenth century. In 1748 the Galley met in the Phcenix Tavern, Werburgh Street; in 1751, at the Ship Tavern, Chapelizod ; in 1765, at the Eose and Bottle, Dame Street ; in 1770, at the Eagle Inn, Eustace Street ; in 1776, at Power's, Booterstown ; in 1796, at Harrington's, Grafton Street ; and, in 1800, at Atwell's Commercial Tavern, Dame Street. In the early part of the nineteenth century the favourite resorts were Leech's Eoyal Hotel, Kildare Street ; Morrison's, in Nassau Street ; the Bilton, in Sackville Street ; and Jude's Hotel, Commercial Buildings. A century ago Atwell's was apparently a favourite eating-house or tavern. In Andrew Carmichael's Metropolis, a topical poem, pubUshed in Dublin in 1805, occurs the line : ' Dip them at Atwell's in a bowl of soup.' - Photographic reproductions of the glass bowl, medals, and silver whistle, referred to at pp. 206-7, have been published in the Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, vol. xxiv. section 0, in which this paper first appeared. Part II CONTEMPOEARY ACCOUNTS OF IRELAND IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY I THE ITINERARY OF FYNES M0RY80N Although it is close upon three centuries since the first publica- tion of the larger portion of the important work known as Fynes Moryson's ' Itinerary,' it is only quite recently that the full scope of Moryson's undertaking has been properly understood. The publication by Mr. Charles Hughes, as lately as 1903, in a work entitled ' Shakespeare's Europe,' ^ of the large section of the ' Itinerary,' which had so long remained in manuscript in the library of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, has for the first time rendered it possible to appreciate the full extent and value of Moryson's labours as a social historian of his own times. No single portion of Moryson's remarkable survey of the manners, customs, and institutions of the various countries and kingdoms of Europe at the opening of the seventeenth century is more valuable than the chapters devoted to Ireland. The ' Description of Ireland,' which forms the fifth chapter of the third book of Part III. of the original ' Itinerary,' is well known and has been more than once reprinted.^ But the account of the ' Commonwealth of Ireland,' which forms the fifth chapter of the second book of the long un- published fourth part and the chapter on Manners and Customs (Book V. chapter v.) were unknown until their publication by Mr. Hughes. Other references to Ireland in the ' Itinerary ' besides those printed in this volume occur in the chapter which treats ' Of ' SJiakespeare' s Europe. Unpublished Chapters of Fynes Moryson's Itinerary : being a Survey of the Condition of Europe at the end of the Sixteenth Century. With an Introduction and an Account of Fynes Moryson's Career. By Charles Hughes, B.A. (London). London : Sherratt & Hughes. 1903. - The Description is included at the end of the second volume of the Dublin edition of Part II. of the Itinerary, pi-inted in 1735 under the title of A History of Ireland from 1559 to 1603. It has also been included by Professor Henry Morley in his Ireland under Elizabeth and James L, which forms vol. x. of the Carisbrooke Library Series. r2 212 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY the Turks, French, EngUsh, Scottish, and Irish Apparel ' (Part III. Book IV. chapter v.), and in that on ' The Journey through Eng- land, Scotland, and Ireland' (Part I. Book III. chapter v.). The latter contains many interesting sidelights on the conditions of travelling in the three kingdoms thi'ee hundred years ago. While the ' Description ' will always remain valuable as a picture of Irish life and manners by a traveller whose large comparative knowledge of the Europe of his day gives a special importance to his observa- tions, Moryson's notes on the Commonwealth have a unique interest for the light they throw on the political institutions of Ireland, as seen by one who had been actively engaged in Irish affairs, and had enjoyed peculiar opportunities of studying the administrative system of the Irish government at a very important crisis in Irish history. A like praise can hardly be accorded to the observations ' touching religion ' in Ireland (Book III. chapter vi.). Moryson's views on this head are as acutely controversial and as inevitably uncharitable as might be expected ; and it has not appeared expedient to print them here. No one can have had greater facilities than were possessed by Fynes Moryson for understanding the machinery of the Irish executive in all its parts as it existed at the close of Elizabeth's reign. For not only was he placed, as secretary to Mount] oy during the whole period of that Viceroy's active career in Ireland, in the closest possible contact with the central executive, but he had ample means of information regarding the local instruments of government in the provinces. His brother, Sir Eichard Moryson, who came to Ireland in the army of Essex in 1599, held important appointments there for close on thirty years. From 1609 to 1628 Sir Eichard held the considerable office of Vice- President of Munster, and he was visited at Cork by the historian in 1613. Thus the faculty of precise observation which gives so much value to Fynes Moryson's narrative, even where his notes represent no more than the rapid but acute deductions of a passing traveller, has, in the case of his account of Ireland, the enhanced interest which comes of the writer's intimate knowledge of the social and pohtical state of the country. Often as it has been printed, Fynes Moryson's ' Description of Ireland' is an indispensable introduction to any collection of contemporary works on seventeenth century Ireland, and as such it is once more printed here. The chapters on the Commonwealth and on manners and customs are reproduced because, although so recently published, the Irish sections of Part IV. of the ' Itinerary * are scattered at wide distances through Mr. Hughes's substantial ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY 213 volume ; • and, forming only a relatively small portion of the whole, have scarcely attracted the attention they deserve. The extracts from ' Shakespeare's Em-ope ' are included in this volume with the cordially expressed assent of Mr. Charles Hughes, and of the owners of the copyright in that work, Messrs. Sherratt & Hughes, publishers, of Manchester and London. Some passages not printed by Mr. Hughes, which appear to throw useful light on the social condition of Ireland at the time when Moryson wrote, are now published for the first time by the kind permission of the President and Fellows of Corpus Cbristi College, Oxford. ' See Sliakcspeare's Europe, pp. 185-260, 285-9, and 481-6. A THE DESCBIPTION OF IRELAND The longitude of Ireland extends four degrees, from the meridian of eleven degrees and a half to that of fifteen and a half, and the latitude extends also four degrees, from the parallel of fifty-four degrees to that of fifty-eight degrees. In the geographical description I will follow Cambden as formerly.^ This famous island in the Virginian sea is by old writers called lerna, Inverna, and Iris, by the old inhabitants Erin, by the old Britains Yuerdhen, by the English at this day Ireland, and by the Irish Bards at this day Banno, in which sense of the Irish word, Avicen calls it the Holy Island ; besides, Plutarch of old called it Ogygia, and after him Isidore named it Scotia.^ This Ireland, according to the inhabitants, is divided into two parts, the wild Irish, and the English-Irish, living in the English pale. But of the old kingdoms, five in number, it is divided into five parts. 1. The first is by the Irish called Mowne, by the English Munster, and is subdivided into six counties — of Kerry, of Limerick, of Cork, of Tipperary, of the Holy Cross, and of Waterford — to which the seventh county of Desmond is now added. The Gangavi, a Scythian people, coming into Spain, and from thence into Ireland, inhabited the county of Kerry, full of woody mountains, in which the Earls of Desmond had the dignity of palatines, having their house in Trailes,^ a little town now almost uninhabited. Not far thence lies ' See Camden's Britannia (edition of 1722), vol. ii. p. 1334 et seq. * On the ancient names of Ireland, see Joyce's Irish Names of Places, ii. pp. 458-9. 3 Tralee. THE DE8CEIPTI0N OF lEELAND 215 St. Mary Wic, vulgarly called Smerwick, where the Lord Arthur Gray, being Lord Deputy, happily overthrew the aiding troops sent to the Earl of Desmond from the Pope and the King of Spain. On the south side of Kerry lies the county of Desmond,^ of old inhabited by three kinds of people, the Luceni (being Spaniards), the Velabri (so called of their seat upon the sea-waters or marshes), and the Iberni, called the upper Irish, inhabiting about Beer-haven and Baltimore, two havens well known by the plentiful fishing of herrings, and the late invasion of the Spaniards in the year 1601. Next to these is the county of MacCarty- More, of Irish race, whom, as enemy to the FitzGeralds, Queen Elizabeth made Earl of Glencar in the year 1566. For of the FitzGeralds, of the family of the Earls of Kildare, the Earls of Desmond descended, who, being by birth Enghsh, and created earls by King Edward III., became hateful rebels in our time. The third county hath the name of the City Cork, consisting almost all of one long street,^ but well known and frequented, which is so com- passed with rebellious neighbours, as they of old not daring to marry their daughters to them, the custom grew, and continues to this day, that by mutual marriages one with another all the citizens are of kin in some degree of affinity. Not far thence is Yoghal, having a safe haven, near which the Viscounts of Barry, of English race, are seated. In the fourth county of Tipperary nothing is memorable, but that it is a palatinate.^ The little town Holy Cross, in the county of the same name, hath many great privileges. The sixth county hath the name of the City Limerick, the seat of a bishop, wherein is a strong castle built by King John. Not far thence is Awne,"* the seat of a bishop, and the Lower Ossory, giving the title of an earl to the Butlers, and the town Thurles, giving them also the title of viscount. And there is Cassiles,^ now a poor city, but the seat of an archbishop. The seventh county hath the name of the ' Vide Part I. p. 132 supra. ^ North and South Main Street. ^ See Part I. p. 112 supra. •• Emiy. ^ Thurles and Cashel are both in Tipperary. 216 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY City Waterford, which the Irish call Porthlargi, of the commodious haven, a rich and well-inhabited city, esteemed the second to Dublin. And because the inhabitants long faith- fully helped the English in subduing Ireland our kings gave them excessive privileges ; but they, rashly failing in their obedience at King James's coming to the crown, could not in long time obtain the confirmation of their old Charter.' 2. Leinster, the second part of Ireland, is fertile, and yields plenty of corn, and hath a most temperate mild air, being divided into ten counties of Catherlough, Kilkenny, Wexford, Dublin, Kildare, the King's County, the Queen's County, the counties of Longford, of Ferns,^ and of Wicklow. The Cariondi of old inhabited Catherlogh (or Carlow) County, and they also inhabited great part of Kilkenny, of Upper Ossory, and of Ormond, which have nothing memorable but the Earls of Ormond, of the great family of the Butlers, inferior to no earl in Ireland (not to speak of Fitzpatrick, Baron of Upper Ossory). It is ridiculous which some Irish (who will be believed as men of credit) report of men in these parts yearly turned into wolves, except the abundance of melancholy humour transports them to imagine that they are so transformed.^ Kilkenny giving name to the second county is a pleasant town, the chief of the towns within land, memorable for the civility of the inhabitants, for the husbandman's labour, and the pleasant orchards, I pass over the walled town Thomastown, and the ancient city Eheban, now a poor village with a castle, yet of old giving the title of baronet. I pass over the village and strong castle of Leighlin, with the country adjoining, usurped by the sept of the Cavanaghs, now surnamed O'Moors. Also I omit Ross,"* of old a large city, at this day of no moment. The third ' The charter of Waterford suspended by James I. was not renewed till 1626, when Charles I. gave the city a new charter. - See Part I. p. 126 siqyra. ^ See, as to this legend, Giraklus Cambrensis, Topographia Hibeiiiica, v. 104 (Rolls Series). See also the remarks on Irish Wolf -legends in Dr. Joyce's Social History of Ancient Ireland, i. p. 299. * Eheban is in Kildare, Leighlin in Cavlow, and Boss in Wexford. But in Moryson's time there was considerable confusion as to the boundaries of all the south-eastern counties of Leinster. See Part I. p. 125 siqva. THE DESCEIPTION OF lEELAND 217 county of Wexford (called by the Irish County Eeogh) was of old inhabited by the Menapii, where, at the town called Banna,' the English made their first descent into Ireland, and upon that coast are very dangerous flats in the sea, which they vulgarly call grounds. The City Weshford, Weisford, or Wexford, is the chief of the county, not great, but deserving praise for their faithfulness towards the English, and frequently inhabited by men of English race. The Cauci (a sea-bordering nation of Germany) and the Menapii aforesaid, of old inhabited the territories now possessed by the O'Moors and O'Birns ; also they inhabited the fourth county of Kildare, a fruitful soil, having the chief town of the same name, greatly honoured in the infancy of the Church by St. Bridget. King Edward II. created the Giralds Earls of Kildare. The Eblani of old inhabited the territory of Dublin, the fifth county, having a fertile soil and rich pastures, but wanting wood, so as they burn turf, or sea- coal brought out of England. The City Dublin, called Divelin by the English, and Balacleigh ^ (as seated upon hurdles) by the Irish, is the chief city of the kingdom, and seat of justice, fairly built, frequently inhabited, and adorned with a strong castle, fifteen churches, an episcopal seat, and a fair college (an happy foundation of an university laid in our age), and endowed with many privileges, but the haven is barred and made less commodious by those hills of sands. The adjoining promontory, Hoth-head, gives the title of a baron to the family of St. Laurence ; and towards the north lies Fingal, a little territory, as it were the garner of the kingdom, which is environed by the sea and great rivers, and this situation hath defended it from the incur- sion of rebels in former civil wars. I omit the King's and Queen's Counties (namely, Ophaly and Leax) inhabited by the O'Connors and O'Moors, as likewise the counties of Longford, Ferns, and Wicklow, as less affording memorable things. ' Bannow. '^ Divelin = Dubh-linn, or black pool. Balacleigh = Bally- Athcliath. See as to the etymology of Dublin, Haliday's Scandinavian Kingdom of Dublin, p. 3 et seg. 218 ILLUSTRATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY 3. The third part of Ireland is Midia or Media, called by the English Meath, in our fathers' memory divided into Eastmeath and Westmeath.' In Eastmeath is Drogheda, vulgarly called Tredagh, a fair and well-inhabited town. Trim is a little town upon the confines of Ulster, having a stately castle, but now much ruinated, and it is more notable for being the ancient (as it were) barony of the Lacies. Westmeath hath the town Delvin, giving the title of baron to the English family of the Nugents, and Westmeath is also inhabited by many great Irish septs, as the O'Maddens, the Magoghigans, O'Malaghlans, and MacCoghlans, which seem barbarous names. Shanon is a great river in a long course, making many and great lakes (as the large lake or Lough Kegith^), and yields plentiful fishing, as do the freqaent rivers and all the seas of Ireland. Upon this river lies the town Athlone, having a very fair bridge of stone (the work of Sir Henry Sidney, Lord Deputy^), and a strong fair castle. 4. Connaught is the fourth part of Ireland, a fruitful province, but having many bogs and thick woods, and it is divided into six counties, of Clare,^ of Leitrim, of Galway, of Eoscommon, of Mayo and of Sligo. The county of Clare or Thomond hath his Earls of Thomond, of the family of the O'Brenes, the old kings of Connaught, and Tuam is the seat of an archbishop ; only part, but the greatest, of this county was called Clare, of Thomas Clare, Earl of Gloucester.^ The adjoining territory. Clan Bichard (the land of Eichard's sons), hath his earls called Clan- rickard of the land, but being of the English family de Burgo, vulgarly Burke, and both these earls were first created by Henry VIII. In the same territory is the Barony Atterith,*' belonging to the barons of the English family Bermingham, of old very warlike, but their posterity have degenerated to ' See Part I. p. 117 supra. - Lough Kee. ' See Part I. p. 122 supra. And see The Old Bridge at Athlotie, by the Rev. John S. Joly, Dublin, 1881. * See Part I. p. 123 supra. * This is a view of the origin of the name of the county which has been held by competent antiquaries. But see Dr. Joyce's etymological derivation, Part I. p. 135 supra. ^ Atlienvy. THE DBSCKIPTION OP lEELAND 219 the Irish barbarism. The City Galway, giving narae to the county, lying upon the sea, is frequently inhabited with civil people, and fairly built. The northern part of Connaught is inhabited by these Irish septs, O'Connor, O'Eourke, and MacDiermod. Upon the western coast lies the island Arran, famous for the fabulous long life of the inhabitants. Ulster, the fifth part of Ireland, is a large province, woody, fenny, in some parts fertile, in other parts barren, but in all parts green and pleasant to behold, and exceed- ingly stored with cattle. The next part to the Pale and to England is divided into three counties — Lowth, Down, and Antrim ; the rest contains seven counties — Monaghan, Tyrone, Armagh, Coleraine, Donnegal, Fermannagh, and Cavan. Lowth is inhabited by English-Irish (Down and Antrim being contained under the same name), and the barons thereof be of the Bermingham's family, and remain loving to the English. Monaghan was inhabited by the English family Fitzursi, and these are become degenerate and barbarous, and in the sense of that name are in the Irish tongue called MacMahon, that is the sons of Bears. I forbear to speak of Tyrone, and the earl thereof, infamous for his rebellion, which I have at large handled in this work. Armagh is the seat of an archbishop, and the metropolitan city of the whole island, but in time of the rebellion was altogether ruinated. The other counties have not many memorable things, therefore it shall suffice to speak of them briefly. The neck of land called Lecaile is a pleasant little territory, fertile, and abounding with fish and all things for food, and therein is Down, at this time a ruined town, but the seat of a bishop, and famous for the burial of St. Patrick, St. Bridget,^ and St. Columb. The town of Carrickfergus is well known by the safe haven. The river Bann, running through the Lake Evagh ^ into the sea, is famous for the fishing of salmons, the water being most clear, wherein the salmons much delight. The great families (or septs) of Ulster are thus named : O'Neal, O'Donnel (whereof the chief was lately created ' St. Bridget was buried at Kildare. - Neagh. 220 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTOEY Earl of Tirconnel), O'Buil, MacGwire, O'Kain, O'Dogherty, MacMahown, MacGennis, MacSurleigh, &c. The lake Erne compassed with thick woods hath such plenty of fish as the fishermen fear the breaking of their nets rather than want of fish. Towards the north, in the midst of vast woods (and as I think) in the county Donnegal is a lake, and therein an island, in which is a cave, famous for the apparition of spirits, which the inhabitants call Ellanvi frugadory — that is, the island of Purgatory — and they call it St. Patrick's Purgatory, fabling that he obtained of God by prayer that the Irish seeing the pains of the damned might more carefully avoid sin.^ The situation. — The land of Ireland is uneven, moun- tainous, soft, watery, woody, and open to winds and floods of rain, and so fenny as it hath bogs on the very tops of mountains, not bearing man or beast, but dangerous to pass, and such bogs are frequent over all Ireland. Our mariners observe the sailing into Ireland to be more dan- gerous, not only because many tides meeting makes the sea apt to swell upon any storm, but especially because they ever find the coast of Ireland covered with mists, whereas the coast of England is commonly clear and to be seen far off. The air of Ireland is unapt to ripen seeds, yet (as Mela wit- nesseth) the earth is luxurious in yielding fair and sweet herbs. Ireland is little troubled with thunders, lightnings, or earthquakes, yet (I know not upon what presage) in the year 1601, and in the month of November almost ended, at the siege of Kinsale and a few days before the famous battle, in which the rebels were happily overthrown, we did nightly hear and see great thunderings and lightnings, not without some astonishment what they should presage. The fields are not only most apt to feed cattle, but yield also great increase of corn. I will freely say that I observed ' For a very full account of St. Patrick's Purgatory, in Lough Derg, co. Donegal, long celebrated as a place of pilgrimage, see an elaborate article by W. Pinkerton in the Ulster Archccological Journal, vols. iv. and v. The chapel on the island was demolished in 1632, and again in 1680, the popularity of the pilgrimage haviug been revived after 1641. See also Ware's ^4?;ii2!ii7it's, which contains a plate showing the 'Purgatory ' prior to its demolition. And seethe Lismcn-e Papers, 1st Ser. iii, p. 15'J. THE DESCRIPTION OF IRELAND 221 the winter's cold to be far more mild than it is in England, so as the Irish pastures are more green, and so likewise the gardens all winter time, but that in summer, by reason of the cloudy air and watery soil, the heat of the sun hath not such power to ripen corn and fruits, so as their harvest is much later than in England. Also I observed that the best sorts of flowers and fruits are much rarer in Ireland than in England, which notwithstanding is more to be attributed to the inhabitants than to the air. For Ireland being oft troubled with rebellions, and the rebels not only being idle themselves, but in natural malice destroying the labours of other men, and cutting up the very trees of fruit for the same cause, or else to burn them : for these reasons the inhabitants take less pleasure to till their grounds or plant trees, content to live for the day in continual fear of like mischief. Yet is not Ireland altogether destitute of these flowers and fruits, wherewith the county of Kilkenny seems to abound more than any other part : and the said humidity of air and land making the fruits for food more raw and moist ; hereupon the inhabitants and strangers are troubled with looseness of body, the country disease. Yet for the rawness they have an excellent remedy by their Aqua Vitae, vulgarly called Usquebagh, which binds the belly, and drieth up moisture more than our Aqua Vitae, yet inflameth not so much. Also inhabitants as well as strangers are troubled there with an ague which they call the Irish ague, and they who are sick thereof, upon a received custom, do not use the help of the physician, but give themselves to the keeping of Irish women, who starve the ague, giving the sick man no meat, who takes nothing but milk and some vulgarly known remedies at their hand. The fertility and traffic. — Ireland, after much blood spilt in the civil wars, became less populous, and as well great lords of countries as other inferior gentlemen laboured more to get new possessions for inheritance, than by husbandry and peopling of their old lands to increase their revenues ; so as I then observed much grass (wherewith the island so much abounds) to have perished without use, and either to 222 ILLUSTRATIONS OP IRISH HISTORY have rotted, or in the next spring time to be burnt, lest it should hinder the coming of new grass ; this plenty of grass makes the Irish have infinite multitudes of cattle, and in the heat of the last rebellion the very vagabond rebels had great multitudes of cows, which they still (like the nomades) drove with them whithersoever themselves were driven, and fought for them as for their altars and families. By this abundance of cattle the Irish have a frequent though some- what poor traffic for their hides, the cattle being in general very little, and only the men and the greyhounds of great stature. Neither can the cattle possibly be great since they eat only by day, and then are brought at evening within the bawns of castles,^ where they stand or lie all night in a dirty yard without so much as a lock of hay, whereof they make little for sluggishness, and their little they altogether keep for their horses ; and they are brought in by nights for fear of thieves, the Irish using almost no other kind of theft, or else for fear of wolves, the destruction whereof being neglected by the inhabitants, oppressed with greater mis- chiefs, they are so much grown in number as sometimes in winter nights they will come to prey in villages and the suburbs of the cities.^ The Earl of Ormond in Munster, and the Earl of Kildare in Leinster, had each of them a small park inclosed for fallow deer, and I have not seen any other park in Ireland, nor have heard that they had any other at that time, yet in many woods they have many red deer loosely scattered,^ which seem more plentiful, because ' For a very instructive account of the bawns surrounding the dwellings of Irish planters in the seventeenth century see ' Notes on Bawns ' in the Ulster Journal of Archaolocjy, vi. p. 125. ^ As to wolves in Ireland see O'Flaherty's West or H-Iar Connauglit, ed. Hardiman, note D, p. 180, where a declaration concerning wolves is printed, with other documents of the Cromwellian period, which shows the extent to which wolves had multiplied during the desolation of the Civil War, and the measures taken to exterminate them. See also Ulster Journal of Arcliceology, ii. p. 281. ^ Red deer were known in a wild state in the west of Ireland down to the middle of the nineteenth century. See Knight's Erris in the Irish Highlands. They still survive in Kerry and Donegal. As to their numbers in the same district in the eighteenth century, see Pocock's Tour in Ireland in 1752, ed. Stokes, p. 86. THE DESCRIPTION OP IRELAND 223 the inhabitants used not then to hunt them, but only the governors and commanders had them sometimes killed with the piece. They have also about Ophalia and Wexford, and in some parts of Munster, some fallow deer scattered in the woods ; yet in the time of the war I did never see any venison served at the table, but only in the houses of the said earls and of the English commanders. Ireland hath great plent}^ of birds and fowls, but by reason of their natural sloth they had little delight or skill in birding or fowl- ing. But Ireland hath neither singing nightingale nor chattering pie,^ nor undermining mole, nor black crow, but only crows of mingled colour such as we call Eoyston crows. They have such plenty of pheasants as I have known sixty served at one feast, and abound much more with rails, but partridges are somewhat rare. There be very many eagles, and great plenty of hares, conies, hawks, called goss-hawks, much esteemed with us, and also of bees, as well in hives at home as in hollow trees abroad and in caves of the earth. They abound in flocks of sheep which they shear twice in the year, but their wool is coarse, and merchants may not export it, forbidden by a law made on behalf of the poor,^ that they may be nourished by working it into cloth, namely rugs (whereof the best are made at Waterford), and mantles are generally worn by men and women and exported in great quantity. Ireland yields much flax, which the inhabi- tants work into yarn, and export the same in great quan- tity ; and of old they had such plenty of linen cloth as the old Irish used to wear thirty or forty ells in a shirt all gathered and wrinkled, and washed in saffron because they never put them off till they were worn out. Their horses, called hobbies, are much commended for their ambling pace and beauty ; but Ireland yields few horses good for service in war, and the said hobbies are much inferior to our geldings in strength to endure long journeys, and being bred in the fenny, soft ground of Ireland are soon lamed when ' ' No Pies to pluck the thatch from House Are bred in Irish ground.' — Derricke's Image of Ireland, p. 43. * See the statutes 11 Eliz. cap. 10, and 13 EHz. cap. 4. 224 ILLUSTEATIONS OF IRISH HISTORY they are brought into England, The hawks of Ireland, called goss-hawks, are (as I said) much esteemed in England, and they are sought out by money and all means to be transported thither.^ Ireland yields excellent marble near Dublin, Kilkenny, and Cork ; and I am of their opinion who dare venture all they are worth that the mountains would yield abundance of metals if this public good were not hindered by the inhabitants' barbarousness, making them apt to seditions, and so unwilling to enrich their prince and country, and by their slothfulness, which is so singular as they hold it baseness to labour, and by their poverty not able to bear the charge of such works ; besides that the wiser sort think their poverty best for the public good, making them peaceable, as nothing makes them sooner kick against authority than riches. Ireland hath in all parts pleasant rivers, safe and long havens, and no less frequent lakes of great circuit, yielding great plenty of fish ; and the sea on all sides yields like plenty of excellent fish, as salmon, oysters (which are preferred before the English), and shell-fishes, with all other kinds of sea-fish, so as the Irish might in all parts have abundance of excellent sea and fresh-water fish, if the fishermen were not so possessed with the natural fault of slothfulness, as no hope of gain, scarcely the fear of authority, can in many places make them come out of their houses and put to sea. Hence it is that in many places they use Scots for fishermen, and they, together with the English, make profit of the inhabitants' sluggishness ; and no doubt if the Irish were industrious in fishing, they might export salted and dried fish with great gain. In time of peace the Irish transport good quantity of corn ; yet they may not transport it without license, lest upon any sudden rebellion the King's forces and his good subjects should want com. Ulster and the western parts of Munster yield vast woods,^ in which the rebels, cutting up trees and casting them on heaps, used to stop the passages, and therein, as also upon ' For information as to hawking in Ireland see a paper by J. P. Prendergast on ' Hawks and Hounds in Ireland,' Journal of Society of Antiquaries of IrC' land, ii. p. 144. * See Part I. p. 14B et seq., supra. THE DESCRIPTION OP IRELAND 225 fenny and boggy places, to fight with the Enghsh. But I confess myself to have been deceived in the common fame that all Ireland is woody, having found in my long journey from Armagh to Kinsale few or no woods by the way, excepting the great woods of Ophalia and some low shrubby places which they call Glins ; also I did observe many boggy and fenny places whereof great part might be dried by good and painful husbandry. I may not omit the opinion commonly received that the earth of Ireland will not suffer a snake or venomous beast to live, and that the Irish wood transported for building is free of spiders and their webs ; ^ myself have seen some (but very few) spiders, which the inhabitants deny to have any poison, but I have heard some English of good credit affirm by experience the contrary. The Irish having in most parts great woods, or low shrubs and thickets, do use the same for fire, but in other parts they burn turf and sea-coals brought out of England. They export great quantity of wood to make barrels, called pipe-staves, and make great gain thereby. They are not permitted to build great ships of war, but they have small ships, in some sorts armed to resist pirates, for transporting of commodities into Spain and France, yet no great number of them ; therefore since the Irish have small skill in navigation, as I cannot praise them for this art, so I am confident that the nation, being bold and warlike, would no doubt prove brave seamen if they shall practise naviga- tion, and could possibly be industrious therein. I freely profess that Ireland in general would yield abundance of all things to civil and industrious inhabitants ; and when it lay wasted by the late rebellion, I did see it after the coming of the Lord Mountjoy daily more and more to flourish, and, in short time after the rebellion appeased, like the new spring to put on the wonted beauty. The diet. — Touching the Irish diet, some lords and knights, and gentlemen of the English-Irish, and all the English there abiding, having competent means, use the Enghsh diet, but some more, some less cleanly, few or none curiously, and ' See Part I. p. 143 supra. Q 226 ILLUSTEATIONS OF lEISH HISTORY no doubt they have as great, and for their part greater, plenty than the EngHsh, of flesh, fowl, fish, and all things for food, if they will use like art of cookery. Always I except the fruits, venison, and some dainties proper to England, and rare in Ireland. And we must conceive that venison and fowl seem to be more plentiful in Ireland, because they neither so generally affect dainty food, nor so diligently search it as the English do.^ Many of the English- Irish have by little and little been infected wdth the Irish filthiness, and that in the very cities, excepting DubHn, and some of the better sort in Waterford, where the English, continually lodging in their houses, they more retain the English diet. The English-Irish after our manner serve to the table joints of flesh cut after our fashion, with geese, pullets, pigs, and like roasted meats, but their ordinary food for the common sort is of white meats, and they eat cakes of oats for bread, and drink not English beer made of malt and hops, but ale. At Cork I have seen with these eyes young maids, stark naked, grinding of corn with certain stones to make cakes thereof, and striking off into the tub of meal such reliques thereof as stuck on their belly, thighs, and more unseemly parts. And for the cheese or butter com- monly made by the English-Irish an Englishman would not touch it with his lips, though he were half-starved ; yet many English inhabitants make very good of both kinds. In cities they have such bread as ours, but of a sharp savour, and some mingled with anice-seeds and baked like cakes, and that only in the houses of the better sort. At Dublin and in some other cities they have taverns,^ wherein Spanish and French wines are sold, but more com- monly the merchants sell them by pints and quarts in their own cellars. The Irish aqua vitse,^ commonly called ' See Gernon's Discozirse, p. 361, infra. * For a very full notice of Dublin taverns see Barnaby Rich's New Description of Ireland, chapter xvii., published in 1610. ^ Notices of the drinking of usquebagh or whisky are frequent in sixteenth and seventeenth century references to Irish social habits. The statute 3