DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PAMPHLET 
NO. 210-4
BISON 
•vs 
{) 1oI· 2 z.· 
'2t0 -¥ 
INSTALLATIONS 
e COORDINATION OF ARMY DEVELOPMENT WITH STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 
SUNY AT BUFFALO 
THE LIBRARIES 
DEPOSITORY COPY 

• 

HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 
JUNE 1977 
• 

• 

*Pam 210-4 
PAMPHLET{ 
HEADQUARTERSDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYNo. 210-4 J WASHINGTON, DC, 27 June 1977 INSTALLATIONS COORDINATION OF ARMY DEVELOPMENT WITH STATE ANDLOCAL GOVERNMENTS 
Paragraph Page
Purpose. 
1 1
Applicability 
2 1
Guidelines .. 
3 2
Responsibilities . 
4 2
Procedures . 
5 3
APPENDIX A. Examples of Other Agency Plans and Programs Which May Require DOD Component's Review and/or Input by Army Elements 
A-1
B. Examples of A-95 Coordinating Agencies .. 	B-1
C. 	DOD Federal Regional Council Liaison Representatives for A-95Matters. 
C-1
D. 	OMB Circular A-95 Federal and Federally Assisted Programs andProjects 
D-1
E. OMB Circular No. A-95-What It Is-How It Works . E-1
F. Directory-State and Areawide A-95 Clearinghouses . 
F-1 
I. Purpose. This pamphlet
b. This pamphlet encompasses all plans and
a. Establishes Department of the Army policies, projects developed by Army elements for conresponsibilities, and procedures for aii intergovstruction (regardless of funding source), acquisiernmental coordination process pursuant to Title tion of real property, withdrawals of Federal landIV of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of for military use, substantial changes in existing1968 (42 USC 4231) to facilitate coordination of utilization of military installations and real propappropriate DA land and facility plans and projerty, and disposal of real property which mayects in the United States with State, areawide, affect State, areawide, local government, or otherlocal government, and other Federal agencies. Federal agencies' (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Domestic Agencies") community devel
b. Provides guidelines, responsibilities, and pro
opment plans and programs, and, conversely,
cedures for a DA review process which State, 
plans and programs developed and implemented
areawide, local government, and other Federal 
by Domestic Agencies which may affect the land
agencies may utilize for review and evaluation of 
and facility plans and projects of DA activities. A
plans and projects of DA activities in the United 
representative listing of such non-DA agency
States. 
plans and programs is contained in Appendix A.
c. Implements DOD Directive Number 4165.61, An illustrative list of Domestic Agencies involveddated 16 December 1976, concerning Office of in such plans and programs is contained in ApManagement and Budget Circular A-95 (Appenpendix B.dix D) with specific reference to portions of Part 
c. The guidelines, responsibilities and proce
II thereof. dures discussed in this pamphlet do not substitutefor, or limit compliance with, existing laws, exec
2. Applicability. a. The provisiOns of this pam
utive orders, and applicable Federal regulations
phlet apply to the Department of the Army, 
applying to requirements such as contained in
major commands, major subordinate commands, 
the 	National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
installations, and other Army elements (excluding 
of 1969 (PL 91-190); Federal Water Pollution
the Civil Works function of the Corps of Engineers 
Control Act (33 USC 1251); Executive Order 11512,
and 	the functions under Part I and Part III of 
Planning, Acquisition and Management of Fed
Office of Management and Budget Circular Num
eral 	Space; and the Coastal Zone Management
ber A-95 of the Defense Civil Preparedness Agen
Act; 	or with existing cooperative agreements be~
cy). 
tween Army Elements and State, areawide, local 
• This pamphlet supersedes DA Pam 210-4, 16 Sep 74, including change 1. 
I 
Pam 210-4 
governments or other Federal agencies on other than A-95 matters, such as conservation. 
d. Army elements responsible for land and facility plans and projects covered by this pamphlet in the National Capital Region (as defined in Section 1(b) of the National Capital Planning Act of 1952, as amended) will coordinate with the National Capital Planning Commission in accordance with existing DA procedures (see AR 210-5), except as provided for under the provisions of Section 610, Public Law 93--166. 
3. Guidelines. a. Army Elements will establish and maintain an intergovernmental coordination management process to achieve full consultation with required State and areawide clearinghouses, other Federal Agencies, and other appropriate elected and appointed officials at the earliest appropriate stage of planning for construction, acquisition of real property, substantial changes in the utilization of military installations and real property, and disposal of real property that may affect Domestic Agencies community development plans and programs. 
b. Army Elements which conduct activities or 
operate installations which may be affected by the plans or programs of Domestic Agencies will actively engage in the community planning process by providing information, policy, and position statements on these plans and programs to the appropriate agencies. 
c. 
The guidelines delineated by this pamphlet are intended to ensure maximum feasible consistency of plans and projects of the Department of the Army with Domestic Agencies plans and programs; to identify those plans and projects that may be duplicative or in conflict; and to provide a management process to facilitate resolving any such differences. 

d. 
To the extent practicable, individual Army Elements will ensure that their plans and projects are consistent and compatible with the plans and projects of other Army Elements and DOD Components in the area and with the development plans and programs of Domestic Agencies, and will encourage reciprocal actions by these agencies with regard to their plans and programs. 

e. 
Army Elements will provide clearinghouses with required information, standards, and criteria as contained in DOD Construction Criteria Manual DOD 4270.1M, 1 Oct 72, and similar Department of the Army publications, and positions in 


regard to the review process which are consistent with applicable DA policies and guidance. To the 

extent practicable, Army Elements will ensure that conflicting information is not provided. Should a significant dichotomy of policy or criteria develop among DOD Components, expeditious action will be taken by the cognizant Army Ele
ments to present the problem to the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Installations and Housing) for resolution. 
f. The requirements established in this pamphlet must be weighed in consideration of possible significant public interest in determining whether notification as prescribed by existing DA procedures on provision of information to the Congress and the public should be accomplished prior to submission of required information to State and areawide clearinghouses and other Federal Agencies as provided for in this pamphlet. 
4. Responsibilities. a. General. The primary re 
sponsibility for accomplishing the actions required  
by OMB Circular A-95 rests with the Army  
element which is the proponent of the plan,  
program, or project under consideration. For mili 
tary construction projects, the proponent is the  
using service as defined in AR 415-10. In most  
cases where the project or proposal involves an  
installation, the installation commander will pro •  
vide information to clearinghouses and State and  
local authorities and accomplish the coordination  
and other actions required by the OMB circular.  
The command having jurisdiction over the instal 
lation will participate in the process as appropri 
ate. In the case of plans, projects, or proposals  
involving land acquisition, construction, or major  
alteration of real property facilities, the appropri 
ate Corps of Engineers Division or District Engi 
neer may assist the installation commander and/  
or the command in the actions required by OMB  
Circular A-95. This assistance will be on a reim 
bursable basis.  
b. The Chief ofEngineers will 
(1) Serve as the Secretary of the Army's  
responsible official for Office of Management and  
Budget Circular Number A-95 and will act as the  
focal point for all matters pertaining thereto.  
(2) Ensure that DA directives, instructions,  
and other DA issuances are reviewed for their  
affect on intergovernmental coordination in ac 
cordance with the policies and procedures con 
tained in this pamphlet.  
(3) Maintain liaison with Army major com 
mands with respect to intergovernmental rela •  
tionships encompassed in Office of Management  
and Budget Circular A-95.  


• 

(4) 
Evaluate significant applicable events and experiences; resolve problem areas provided by Army Elements, DOD Federal Regional Council (FRC) Liaison Officers, and clearinghouse activities; and provide the necessary guidance to the organizations involved. 

(5) 
Assign a lead Army Element to effect the coordination stipulated in this pamphlet when a required review of plans and programs of a nonDOD agency involves more than one Army Element. 

(6) 
Establish appropriate procedures to ensure that planned actions within the Hudson River Basin are not initiated prior to final clearance by Department of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior is the US official designated to negotiate a compact among the States involved to ensure the development, preservation, and restoration of the natural, scenic history and recreational resources of the Hudson River Basin and is responsible for consulting with, and review~ ing all plans, programs, projects, and grants of all Federal Agencies within, or affecting the basin. 

(7) 
Designate, as an additional duty, a knowledgeable and qualified person, in accordance with ~p~endix C, for each of the three Federal regions Indicated as being an Army responsibility, to serve as the DOD Federal Regional Council (FRC) Liaison Officer for all DOD A-95 matters within the cognizance of the Region. The identification of each DOD FRC Liaison Officer will be provided 


to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (I&H), who will ensure the widest possible dissemination of these designations and any subsequent changes. 
c. Major Army Commands will-
(1) Establish and maintain an intergovern
mental coordination management process concerning their land and facility plans and projects as prescribed herein. 
(2) Develop and publish documents for the implementation of the guidelines, responsibilities, and procedures contained in this pamphlet. 
(3) Monitor the application of guidelines re
sponsibilities, and procedures contained in 'this pamphlet within their subordinate elements. 
(4) 
Designate a single headquarters point of cont~ct fo~ A-95 matters covered by this pamphlet and Identify to the Chief of Engineers, ATTN: DAEN-MCP, the designated individual or office together with any subsequent changes. ' 

(5) 
Develop procedures which will ensure that copies of clearinghouse comments, reviews, determinations, and recommendations together with 


Pam 210-4 
the current status of DA plans and projects are properly available and retained. 
d; The State and areawide A-95 clearinghouses and applicable Federal Agencies, pursuant to Of fice ofManagement and Budget Circular A-95
(1) 
Will be provided the necessary information and data by the cognizant Army Element for those plans and projects covered by this pamphlet. 

(2) 
May review, evaluate, and provide comments and recommendations, as appropriate, within the specified time frame, on the plans and projects submitted by Army Elements. Comments and recommendations are to be forwarded to the Army Elements making the submission and the single response should normally contain those ~f all interested State and areawide clearinghouse activities. 


(3) Will be encouraged to provide to Army 
Elements for review and evaluation, information on applicable plans and programs proposed by Domestic Agencies that may affect Army Element plans and projects. 
5. Procedures. a. General. 
(1) Army Elements should utilize cooperative agreements in the form of memoranda of understanding to establish the information and data to be submitted to clearinghouses and the time frames in which the submittals will be made, within the guidelines contained in this pamphlet. Army Elements will coordinate with DOD FRC Liaison Officers to determine those specific clearinghouses and/or Federal activities with whom DA Elements will establish such memora~d~. When a determination is made by an Army Element that a cooperative agreement with a particular clearinghouse or Federal Agency is desirable and possible, all Army Elements which have installations within the clearinghouse geographical area should become parties to the 
agreement to the extent practical. When such agreements are used, the application and content will be uniform and will be consistent with the guidelines and procedures contained in this pamphlet. However, cooperative agreements which predate this pamphlet may continue in force until revision is required, and should be used as the basis for any new agreements to be concluded by other Army Elements in the affected area, if appropriate. 
(2) Army Elements will maintain, as part of the records of each review the comments received from the clearinghouse or Federal Agency together with the current status of the review. 

Pam 210-4 

(3) The specific information and data to be response will be made a part of the permanent 
provided to clearinghouses or Federal Agencies depends upon the particular plan or project and must be determined by each Army Element. However, such information as is normally available for construction projects such as site location, scope of work, type of construction, and description of work, together with necessary site plans should be provided to the clearinghouse activities. Normally, justification or rationale for the project is not to be provided. In general, sufficient information and data necessary to review and evaluate the plan or project in question is to be provided. 
(4) Requests from clearinghouse activities or Federal Agencies for additional information and data should be handled in accordance with the provisions of AR 340-16, AR 340-17, and AR 380
5. In the case of a negative response to a clearinghouse or Federal Agency request for information, the Army Elements will so advise the clearinghouse or Federal Agency in writing, with appropriate explanation, and ensure that this response is a part of the record maintained for that particular review. 
(5) 
Classified data on Army Element plans or projects is not to be provided to any agency whether DOD or non-DOD which does not have the necessary authority to receive such data and the necessary procedures facilities to safeguard it. 

(6) 
Thirty to forty-five days, or a period otherwise mutually agreed upon by the Army Elements and the appropriate clearinghouse in a cooperative agreement, will be allowed to permit a thorough review, preparation of staff comments, if appropriate, and consolidation and transmission of clearinghouse activities' comments to the Army Elements. Cooperative agreements should also 


contain provisions for procedures to shorten or extend the time allowed for performance of clearinghouse functions in case such need arises. A statement for the record will be prepared if no comments or recommendations are received from the clearinghouse and/or Federal Agency within the agreed period which will constitute State and areawide clearinghouse and/or Federal Agency concurrence in the proposed Army Element plan or project. 
(7) Army Elements will make every reasonable effort to accommodate, modify, or otherwise change their plans or projects to be consistent with clearinghouse and Federal Agency comments. If Army Elements determine that recommendations made by the clearinghouse or other Federal Agency cannot be made, Army Elements will advise the clearinghouse or Federal Agency in writing, with appropriate explanation, and this record maintained for that particular review. 

(8) Applicable Army Elements will have complied with the intergovernmental coordination requirements pursuant to OMB Circular A-95, Part II, for those plans and projects covered by 
• 

this pamphlet, by submission of the applicable plans and projects required by the provisions of this pamphlet, to appropriate A-95 clearinghouses and/or applicable Federal Agencies. Army Elements are cautioned, however, that compliance with the provisions of this pamphlet does not constitute compliance with the requirements of such laws, executive orders, and Federal regulations which govern NEPA, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, and similar requirements because these require special considerations which are covered in other publications. Army Elements should also be aware that there are other appropriate local government activities not covered by the clearinghouse procedures which may have an interest in the plans and projects under consideration. Such additional coordination should be considered on the same basis as are official clearinghouses and will be consistent with the security, sensitivity, and other considerations involved. 
b. Army Element Plans and Projects. 
(1) There are no minimum quantitative levels that can be utilized to determine whether a specific planned action or project must be coordi
•nated with State and areawide clearinghouses or other Federal Agencies. However, as a general rule, repair, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects are excluded from the provisions of this pamphlet unless they result in substantially increased capacity or change in primary functions of facilities which could affect non-DA utility services and systems, road networks, or other such facilities in the surrounding area or region. Similarly; urgent minor construction projects accomplished under the provisions of 10 USC 2674 and military contingency projects involving national security would normally be excluded from the provisions of this pamphlet. Such exclusions should be negotiated and included in cooperative agreements with clearinghouses, if used. In general, the following type of plan and projects are to be considered for submission to State and areawide clearinghouses: 
(a) 
Department of the Army approved in
stallation master plans developed in accordance 
with the provisions of AR 210-20. 


(b) 
Major military construction and/or fam
ily housing projects included in the budget fiscal 
year Army Military Construction and Family 




Pam 210-4 

• 

Housing Program which may affect community 
development, plans, or programs of Domestic 
Agencies, especially as regards utility systems, 
road networks, schools, and transportation sys
tems. 
(c) 
Real Property Acquisition Projects approved by the Department of the Army, or included in the current fiscal year Army Military Construction or Family Housing Program, which may affect community development plans or programs of Domestic Agencies. 

(d) 
Department of the Army approved plans and projects which substantially change the utilization of military installations and real property, and may affect community development plans or programs of Domestic Agencies. 

(e) 
Real Property Disposal Projects which may affect community development plans or programs of Domestic Agencies. 

(2) 
Any of the aforementioned Army Element plans or projects may not affect community development plans and programs depending on the evaluation of the specific plans or projects under consideration. Whether or not a particular plan or project is to be coordinated with the appropriate clearinghouse activities depends upon the judgment of the Army Elements involved, and should be based upon an evaluation of the impact of the plan or project on the locality and surrounding area where the planned action is to take place. 

(3) 
The procedures discussed above will be considered in addition to compliance with the requirements of the NEPA, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, and similar laws since these require special considerations which are covered in other publications. 

c. Submissions. 

(1) 
Subject to other provisiOns as may be required by the implementing guidelines of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Coastal Zone Management Act, and other statutory and regulatory requirements, Army Elements should submit their plans and projects to the State and areawide clearinghouses and applicable Federal Agencies for review at the stage of the planning process indicated below. 

(2) 
The Army installation master plan as described in AR 210-20 should be submitted upon DA approval by the Chief of Engineers. Similarly, significant DA approved changes to the installation master plan should be submitted for review. Review of an installation's master plan will enable 


the clearinghouse activities or applicable Federal Agency to better understand and evaluate the impact of the land and facility use and requirements planned by the military installation in question. It will also facilitate the review of subsequent annual construction, acquisition and disposal of real property projects which may result from the continued implementation of the master plan. 
(3) Information on appropriate major Military Construction and Family Housing projects should be submitted no later than after approval of a design directive for project development, to be accomplished either in-house or by contract. Information on family housing projects should normally be provided upon initiation of architect-engineer (AE) selection for project development as announced in the Commerce Business Daily. However, Army Elements should evaluate any substantive changes in project development subsequent to completion of a review, for possible additional review. Since based on foregoing, project information could be provided prior to transmission of a project in the Military Construction Program (MCA) to the Congress, care must be exercised to ensure that no project data which indicates the year of funding or estimated cost of the project is provided to clearinghouses, with the exception of the National Capital Planning Commission. (See AR 210-5.) Upon verification that a project is included in the budget fiscal year Army Military Construction Program which has been submitted to the Congress, appropriate additional information and documentation on the project (e.g. DD Forms 1391) may be provided for review, provided it is consistent with the information submitted to the Congress. Proposed major military construction projects included in the Five Year Defense Plan will not be submitted to the clearinghouses or other Federal Agencies, except the National Capital Planning Commission, individually or collectively, except as provided for above. The requirements of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1975 do not basically change the review process specified in AR 415-15 for military health and medical facility projects. Accordingly, Army Elements will continue to comply with the provisions of this reference for military health and medical facility projects. Each document (DD Form 1391), for projects subject to the provisions of AR 415-15, forwarded to the Office of the Secretary of Defense for review and approval pursuant to applicable Army directives will include a statement explaining the status of the clearinghouse and/or other Federal Agency review. 


Pam 210-4 

(4) 
Appropriate Real Property Acquisition Projects will be submitted only upon verification that the project has been approved by the competent authority of the Department of the Army, or, if Congressional approval is required, only after the Congress has been officially notified of the plan or action by the responsible Army Element authority. However, for exceptional cases, this procedure may be waived by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (l&H). In addition, in cases where real property acquisition is part of a major Military Construction or Family Housing project, the real property acquisition may be coordinated as part of that project even though the above events may not have occurred. 

(5) 
Appropriate plans and projects which may substantially change the utilization of military installations and real property and, therefore, could affect non-DOD facilities, commercial utilities, or service activities, will be submitted only after approval by the competent authority of the concerned Army Element and, if Congressional notification of the plan or action is required to be made by existing DA policy, only after the Congress has been officially notified of the plan or action by the responsible Army Element authority. 

(6) 
Appropriate real property disposal projects which require prior" DOD approval in accordance with the provisions of AR 405-90 will be submitted only after all required DOD screening has been completed, and the disposal report required by 10 USC 2662 has been cleared by the Congress. For exceptional cases, this procedure may be waived by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (l&H) to enable submission to clearinghouses at the time the disposal report required by 10 USC 2662 is submitted to the Congress. 



d. DOD Federal Regional Council (FRC) Liaison 0 fficers will
(1) 
Serve as the local representatives of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (l&H). 

(2) 
Establish and maintain liaison with State and_ areawide clearinghouses in their assigned regiOns to determine any special requirements which may exist. 

(3) 
Keep all appropriate DOD Components ~ithin their assigned regions of responsibility mformed of significant A-95 Federal Regional Council and clearinghouse activities. 

(4) 
Resolve, through the use of the point of contact designated by Army major commands (see paragraph 4c(4)) or by other military departments, issues and problems between DOD Components and/or clearinghouse activities and other Federal Agencies in regard to A-95 matters. If resolution is not achieved at these levels the 


. ' 
matter will be forwarded expeditiously to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (l&H) for resolution. If Army Elements are involved, the case should be forwarded through the Chief of Engineers. 
.(5) Ensure that, within their assigned regions, reviews of plans and projects among DOD Components and between DOD Components and clearinghouse activities are uniform and consistent with the guidelines and procedures contained in this pamphlet. 
(6) Will inform the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (l&H) of those events, experiences, and problem areas which can be used to improve the DOD A-95 review process, so that they can be evaluated and disseminated to other FRC Liaison Officers and interested personnel and activities. 


Pam 210-4 
• Appendix A 
EXAMPLES OF 
OTHER AGENCY PLANS AND PROGRAMS WlllCH MAY REQUIRE DOD COMPONENTS REVIEW AND/OR INPUT -Environmental Impact Assessments and Statements -Noise Abatement and Control Plans and Programs -Coastal Zone Management Plans and Programs -HUD 701 Comprehensive Plans and Programs -EPA Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plans and Programs -Recreation Plans and Programs -Fish and Wildlife Conservation Plans and Programs -Air Quality Plans and Programs -Flood Control Plans and Programs -State and Regional Transportation Plans and Programs -State and Regional Land Use Plans and Programs -Energy Facility Siting Plans and Programs -FHA Mortgage Insurance Plans and Programs -VA Mortgage Insurance Plans and Programs -Primitive Area Plans and Programs -Wilderness Area Plans and Programs -Historic and Scenic Trails Plans and Programs 

• 

• 

Pam 210-4 
• AppendixB 
EXAMPLES OF A-95 
COORDINATING AGENCIES* 
FEDERAL AGENCIES 
-Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
-Federal Aviation Administration (FAA of DOT) 
-Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 
-Veterans Administration (VA) 

-Federal Energy Administration (FEA) 
-Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) 
-Department of the Interior 

• 
Outdoor Recreation 

• 
Land Management 


• Fish and Wildlife -US Forest Service (USFS of DOA) -Soil Conservation Service (SCS of DOA) -US Army Corps of Engineers -Federal Highway Administration (DOT) 
STATE AND AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES -Planning and Community Affairs -Economic Development -Transportation (Highway, Aeronautics) -Recreation Activities -Natural Resources Activities -Fish and Wildlife Activities -Land Agencies -Water Resources Agencies -Air Quality Agencies -Environment or Ecology Activities -Conservation Activities -Coastal Zone Management Activities 
• This example of coordinating agencies for A-95 purposes, is not a complete list. The actual coordinating agencies for which this DoD implementation of A-95 applies will depend upon State and areawide clearinghouse activity requirements and the circumstances of the plan or project to be reviewed and evaluated. Moreover, it is most important that DoD Components coordinating plans and projects do not consider the above list of agencies as complete as regards the compliance requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the implementing guidelines of the Council on Environmental Quality; Federal Water Pollution Control Act and other such laws, Executive Orders, and Federal regulations. Compliance with such requirements, require special considerations which are contained in other publications. 

• 

• 

Pam 210-4 
• AppendixC DOD FEDERAL REGIONAL COUNCIL LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES 
FOR A-95 MATTERS 

STANDARD FEDERAL REGIONS 
ADDRESSES OF FEDERAL NO. REGIONAL COUNCIL OFFICES I 
Region I Fed Regional Council Ofc JFK Federal Building, Room E 431 Boston, Massachusetts 02203 
II 	Region II Fed Regional Council Ofc 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3543A New York, New York 10007 
III 	Region III Fed Regional Council Ofc 4450 Federal Building 600 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 
IV 	Region IV Fed Regional Council Ofc 1371 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 515 Atlanta, Georgia 30309 
V 	Region V Fed Regional Council Ofc 300 South Wacker Drive, 18th Floor Chicago, illinois 60606 
VI 	Region VI Fed Regional Council Ofc 1100 Commerce Street, Room 9C28 Dallas, Texas 75202 
VII 	Region VII Fed Regional Council Ofc 610 East 12th Street Kansas City, Missouri 64106 
VIII 	Region VIII Fed Regional Council Ofc Federal Building, Room 14041 1961 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80202 
IX 	Region IX Fed Regional Council Ofc 450 Golden Gate Avenue 
P.O. Box 36098 San Francisco, California 94102 
X 
Region X Fed Regional Council Ofc 1321 Second Avenue · Seattle, Washington 98101 
DOD FEDERAL REGIONAL COUNCIL UAISON REPRESENTATIVES* Air Force 
Army 
Navy 
Navy 
Air Force 
Air Force 
Army 
Air Force 
Navy 
Army 
• Military Department responsible for designating ODASD (I&H) representative. 


APPENDIX D 

• 
TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
PART IV: 
OFFICE OF 
MANAGEMENT 
AND BUDGET 

• 

EVALUATION, REVIEW 
AND COORDINATION OF 
FEDERAL AND 
FEDERALLY ASSISTED 
PROGRAMS AND 
PROJECTS 

D -1 
Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND and community development, Including chure, "A-95: What It Is-How It
BUDGET programs providing Federal assistance to Works," obtainable from the OfHce of 
(Circular No. A-95 Revised] the States and localities, to the end that Management and Budget or from Fed
they shall most effectively serve these eral Regional Councils.
EVALUATION, REVIEW, AND COORDINA· basic objectives. 5. "A-95 Administrative Notes." From
TION OF FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY "In addition, I expect the Bureau of 

time to time OMB will Issue "A-95 Ad
ASSISTED PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 
the Budget to generally coordinate the ministrative Notes" providing interimJANUARY 2, 1976. actions of the departments and agencies determinations or interpretations on
1. 	In exercising the new authorizations promatters of national scope relating to ad
Purpose. This Circular furnishes
guidance to Federal agencies for coop	vided by the Intergovernmental Coopministration of the Circular.
eration with State and local governments eration Act, with the obJective of con6. Federal Regional Councils. Federal
In the evalt:ation, review, and coordinasistent and uniform action by the Federal Regional Councils are responsible for

Government."
tion of Federal and federally a~sisted 	coordinating the Implementation of the
b. Title IV, section 403, of the Inter
programs and projects. The Circular 	requirements of this Circular at the Fed
governmental Cooperation Act of 1968
promulgates regulations <Attachment 	eral regional level. The OfHce of Man
which provides that:
A> which provide, In part, for: 	agement and Budget Is responsible for
a. Encouraging the establishment of "The Bureau of the Budget or such policy oversight of the Circular and liai
a project notification and review system other agency as may be designated by son with departmental and agency liai
to facilitate coordinated planning on an the President. is hereby authorized to son ofHcers on matters of national scale
Intergovernmental basis for certain Fedprescribe such rules and regulations as related to the requirements of the Cir

are deemed appropriate for the etrective 	cular.
eral assistance programs in furtherance administration of this Title."
of section 204 of the Demonstration 7. Federal agency implementing pro
Cities and Metropolitan Development c. Section 204<c> of the Demonstration cedures and regulations. Agencies will

Cities and Metropolitan Development 	develop inlerim procedures and regulaAct of 1966 and Title IV of the IntergovAct of 1966 which provides that:
ernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 <Attions Implementing the requirements of
taclunent B>. "The Bureau of the Budget, or such this Circular revision which will become

b. Coordination of direct Federal deother agency as may be designated by effective on February 27, 1976. The
the President, shall prescribe such rules
velopment programs and projects with 	interim procedures and regulations will
and regulations as are deemed appropri
State, areawide, and local planning and 	be published In the FEDERAL REGISTER no
programs pursuant to Title IV of the 	ate for the effective administration of later than February 27, 1976. Agencies
this section," and

Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 	will promulgate final implementing pro
d. Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970
1968. 	cedures and regulations no later than
and Executive Order No. 11541 of July 1,
c. Securing the comments and views of 	April 29, 1976. OMB will assist and coop
1970, which vest all fw1ctlons of the Bu
State and local agencies which are auerate with agencies in developing suchthorized to develop and enforce envireau of the Budget or thP. Director of procedures and regulations.ronmental standards on certain Federal the Bureau of the Budget in the Director 8. Inqutrtes. Inquiries concerning this
of the OfHce of Management and Budget.
or federally assisted projects affecting Circular may be addressed to the Rethe environment pursuant to section 102 3. Coverage.: The regulations promulgional A-95 Coordinator for the appro
<2> <C> of the National Environmental 	gated by this Circular <Attaclunent A> priate Federal Regional Council or to
will have applicability:
Policy Act of 1969 <Attachment <C>) the OfHce of Management and Budget,and regulations of the Council on Envia. Under Part I, to all projects and Washington, D.C. 20503, telephone
ronmental Quality. 	activities <or significant substantive (202) -395-3031.changes thereto) for which Federal as
d. Furthering the objectives of Title 	JAMES T. LYNN,
sistance is being sought under the pro
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 	Director.
grams listed in Attachment D or AppenThis Circular rupersedes Circular No. 
ATTACHMENT A-CIRCULAR NO. A-95
A-95 <Revised>, dated November 13, 1973 	dix I of the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance whichever bears the later REYISED
\i'art II, FEDERAL REGISTER, Vol. 38, No. 
date. Limitations and provisions for ex
228, pp. 32874-32881, November 28, 1973). 	Reuulattcms Under Section 204 of the
ceptions are noted therein or under para
Itwill become effective February 27, 1976. 	Demomtration Ctties and Metropoli
z. Basis. This Circular has been pregraph 8 of Part I. tan Development Act of 1966, Title Iltpared pursuant to: b. Under Part II, to all direct Federal of the Intergovernmental Cooperation
development activities, Including the ao
Act of 1961, and Sectton 102<2> <C> of
a. Section 40l<al of the Intergovernquisltlon, use, and disposal of Federal 
the Natio1Ull Envtronmental Pollet/ Act
mental Cooperation Act of 1968 which 	real property;' In addition, agencies reo/1969
provides, In part, that: sponsible for granting liccll8es a.nd per"The President shall • • • establish mits for developments or activities sigPAIIT I: PROJ'ECT KO'TIFICATION AND REVIEWrules and regulations governing the fornificantly affecting area and community SYSTEMmulation, evaluation, and review of development or the physical environ1. Purp05e. The purpose of this Part IsFederal programs and projects having a ment are strongly urged to consult with to:significant impact on area and commuclearinghouses on applications for such 
a. Further the policies and directives
nity development • • •" licenses or permits. of Title IV of the Intergovernmental Co
and the President's Memorandum of Noc. Under Part III, to all Federal prooperation Act of 1968 by encouraging the
vember 8, 1968, to the Director of the, grams as listed in Appendix II of the establishment of a network of State and
Bureau of the Budget ("FEDERAL REGISCatalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, areawide planning and development 
f'!R, Vol. 33, No. 221, November 13, 1968) requiring, by statute or administrative clearinghouses which will aid in the co
which provides: regulation, a State plan as a condition ordination of Federal or federally as
of assistance. sisted projects and programs with Ste.te,

"By virtue of the authority vested In d. Under Part IV, to all Federal proareawide, and local planning for orderlyme by section 301 of title 3 of the United 
grams providing assistance to State, growth and development.
states Code and section 401<a> of the 	areawide, .or local agencies or organiza
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 	b. Implement the requirements or sec
tions for multljurisdlctional or a.reawide 
tion 204 of the Demonstration Cities and
1968 <Public Law 90-577), I hereby de	planning. Metropolitan Development Act of 1966
legate to you the authority vested In the
President to establish the rules and reg4. "A-95: What It Is-How It Works." for metropolitan areas within that net
ulations provided for In that section govA fuller discussion of thE\ background, work. 
erning the formulation, evaluation, and purposes, and objectives of the Circular c. Implement, in part, requirements of
rf)v1ew of Federal programs and projand of the requirements promulgated seotion 102<2> <C> ot the National En-·
ects having a signiflcant Impact on area thereunder may be found In the bro-vlronmental PoUc:y Act of 1969, which 

•
D-2 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, 	JANUARY 13, 1976 
require 	that State, areawide, and local 
• 	agencies which are authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards be given an opportunity to comment on the environmental impact of Federal or federally assisted projects. 
d. 
Provide public agencies charged with enforcing or furthering the objectives of State and local clvll rights laws witb opportunity to participate in the review process established under this Part. 

e. 
Encourage, by means of early contact between applicants for Federal assistance and State and local governments and agencies, an expeditious process-of intergovernmental coordination and review of proposed projects. 

2. Notification of intent. 

a. 
Any agency of State or local government or any organization or Individual undertaking to apply for assistance to a project or major substantive modification thereto under a Federal program covered by this Part will be required to notify both the State and areawide planning and development clearinghouse in the jurisdiction of which the project is to be located of Its intent to apply for assistance at such time as It determines it will develop an application. 


In the case of applications for projects involving land or water use and development or construction in the National 
Capital Region <as defined in section 1 (b) of the National Capital Planning Act of 1952, as amended> a copy of the notification will be sent to the National Capital Planning Commission <NCPC> in addition to the areawide clearinghouse and the appropriate State clearinghouse. NCPC Is the official planning agency for the Federal Government in the National Capital Region. 
In the case of an appUcation in any State for an activity that is Statewide or broader in nature <such as for various types of research> and does not affect nor have specific applicability to areawide or local planning and programs. the notification need be sent only to the State clearinghouse. Involvement of areawide clearinghouses In the review In 
such cases will be at the Initiative of the State clearinghouse. 
Notifications wm Include a summary description of the project for which assistance w1ll be sought. The summary description will contain the following information, as appropriate and to the extent available: 
<1> Identity of the applicant agency, organization, or Individual. . 
<2> The geographic location of the project to be assisted. A map should be provided, If appropriate. 
(3) A brief description of the proposed project to be assisted. A map should be scale, estimated cost, beneficiaries, or other characteristics which will enable the clearinghouses to Identify agencies of State or local government having plans, programs, or projects that might 
be a-ffected by the proposed project.~ 
<4> A statement as to whether or not the applicant has been advised by the funding agency from which assistance. Is being sought that he wlll be required 
NOTICES 
to submit environmental Impact Information in connection with the proposed project.
<5> The Federal program tltJe and number and agency under which assistance will be sought as indicated in Attachment D or the latest Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. <The Catalog Is issued annually in the spring and Is updated during the year.> In the case of programs not listed therein, programs will be identified by Public Law number or U.S. Code citation. 
<6> The estimated date the-applicant expects to formally file an application. 
Many clearinghouses have developed notification forms and Instructions. Applicants are urged to contact their clearinghouses for such Information In order to expedite clearinghouse review. 
b. 
In order to assure maximum time for effective coordination and so as not to delay the timely submission of the completed application to the funding agency, notifications containing the preliminary iilformatlon Indicated above should be sent at the earliest feasible time. 

c. 
Applications from federally recognized Indian tribes are not subject to the requirements of this Part. However, Indian tribes may voluntarily participate In the Project Notification and Review System and are encouraged to do so. Federal agencies will notify the appropriate State and areawide clearinghouses of any applications from federally recognized Indian tribes upon their receipt. Where a federally recognized Tribal Government has established a mechanism for coordinating the activities of Tribal departments, divisions, enterprises, and entities, Federal agencies will, upon request of such Tribal Government transmitted through the Office of Management and Budget, require that applications for assistance under programs covered by thl.s Part from such Tribal departments, divisions, enterprises, and entities be subject toreview by such Tribal coordinating mechanism as though it were a State or area


wide clearinghouse. 
3. Cleartnghouse Junctions. Clearinghouse functions include: 
a. 
Evaluating-the significance of proposed Federal or federally assisted projects to State, areawide, or local plans and programs. 

b. 
Receiving and disseminating project nolficatlons to appropriate State and multistate agencies in the case of the State clearinghouse and to appropriate local governments and agencies and regional organizations In the case of areawide clearmghouses; and providing liaison, as may be necessary, between such agencies or bodies and the applicant. In the case of units of general local government, notifications of all projects affecting his Jurisdiction will, If requested, be sent to the chief executive of such unit by the areawide clearinghouse or to such central agency as he may designate for review and reference to appropriate agencies of such unit. 

c. 
In he case of projects under programs covered by this Part located in 



Pam 210-4 
. 
the coastal zone, as defined In the Coastal ZOne Management Act of 1972, as8uring that the State agency, l.f other than the State clearinghouse, responsible for administration of the approved program for the management of the coastal zone, ,Is given opportunity to review the project for Its relationship to such prograln and Its consistency therewith. 
d. Assuring, pursuant to section 1.02(2) (C> of the National Environmental PolIcy Act of 1939, that appropriate State, multlstate, areawide, or local agencies which are authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards are in
formed of and arc given opportunity to review and comment on the environmental significance of proposed projects for which Federal assistance Is sought. 
e. 
Provdiiilg public agencies charged with enforcing or furthering the obJectives of State and local civil rights laws with opportunity to review and comment on the civil rights aspects of the project for which assi~tance Is sour.ht. 

f. 
Providing, pursuant to Part II of these regulations, liaison between Federal agencies contemplating direct Federal development projects and theJState or areawide agencies_ or local governments having plans or programs that might be affected by the prop011ed project. 

g. 
In the case of a project for which Federal assistance is sought by a special purpose unit of local government, clearinghouses will assure that any unit of general local government having jurisdiction over the a.rea in which the project is to be located has opportunity to confer. consult, and comment upon the proJect and the'appllcatlon. 

h. 
Where areawide clearinghouse jurisdictions are contiguous, coordlnatlve arrangements should be established between the clearinghouses In such areas to assure that projects in one area vyh!ch may have an Impact on the development of a contiguous a.rea are jointly studied. Any comments and recommendations made by or through a clearinghouse In one area on a project In a contiguous area will accompany the application for assistance to thAt project. 


4. Consultation and revie!V. a. State and m·eawlde clearinghouses may have a period of 30 days after receipt of a proJect notification In which to Inform State and multl.sta.te agencies and local or regional governments or agencies <Including agencies referred to In subparagraphs c, d. and e, above> that may be affected by the proposed project and arranse, as may be neces.~ary, to consult with the applicant thereon. The review may be completed In this period and comments ma1 be submitted to the applicant. 
b. 
U the review is not completed durIng this period, the clearinghouse m81 work with the applJcant In the resolution of any problems raised by the proposed project during the period In which the application Is being completed. 

c. 
In cases where no project notification has been submitted and the clearInghouse receives only a completect application, it may have 60 days to renew the completed application. U a completed 


rED~R/\L REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
D -3 

Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
application is submitted during the first in deteymining whether the proJect is in
30 days aft--r· !l t::t}tification has been subaccord with applicable Federal law, par1972, in the case of a project located in
mitted, tht: .,;learinghouse may have 30 the coastal zone, the relationship of the

ticularly those requiring consistency project to the approved State programdays plus the number of days remal.n1ng with State, areawide, or local plans. 
for the management of the coastal zone
in the initial 30 day notification period Comments or recommendations may inand its consistency therewith.
to complete its review. In all other cases, clude, but need not be limited to, infor
•the clearinghouse may have 30 days to mation a·bout: h. The extent tD w11:ch the project con
tributes to more bahnced patterns ofreview a completed application. Where a. The extent to which the project is settlement and delivery of services to allclearinghouses have not completed their consistent with or contributes to the fulsectors of the area population, includingreviews during the 30 day notification pefillment of comprehensive planning for minority groups.
riod, they are strongly urged tCY'give the the State, area, or locality.
applicant formal notice to that effect. i. In the case of a project for which
b. The extent to which the proposed assistance is being sought by a special
Where reviews have been completed.prior project:
to completion of an application, an in<ll Duplicates, runs counter to, or purpose unit of local government,
whether the tm:t of general local govformation copy will be supplied to the needs to be coordinated with other proj
clearinghouse, upon request, when the ects or activities being carried out in or ernment having jur'sdiction over the
area in which the project is to be locatedapplication is submitted to the funding affecting the area; or has applied, or plans to apply, for as
agency. (2) Might be revised to increase its sistance for the same or a similar type
d. Written comments submitted to the effectiveness or emciency in relationship project. This information is necessary
areawide clearinghouse by other jurisdicto other State, area, or local programs to enable the Federal <or State) agency
tions, agencies, or parties will be included and projects. 
to make the judgments required underas attachments to the comments of areac. The extent to which the project section .4:02 of the Intergovernmentalwide clearinghouses, when they are at contributes to the achievement of State, Cooperation Act of 1968. ·variance wtih the clearinghouse comareawide, and local objectives and pri
6. Fed~ral agency procedures. Federal
ments; and others tram whom comments orities relating to natural and human agencies having rroq-rams covered underwere solicited and received should be resources and economic and community this Part will develop appropriate prolisted. development as specified in section 401 of cedures for:e. Under some programs, applicantsthe Intergovernmental Cooperation ,Act a. Informing r-otential applicants ·for
primarily nongovernmental -are reof 1968, including: . assistance t•nder such programs of the
quired to submit confidential information (1) Appropriate land uses for housing, 

requirements of thls Ptut (1) in program
to the funding agency. Such information commercial, industrial, governmental, informati?n mP.t~rialR, (2) in response
may relate to the applicant's financial institutional, and other purposes; 

to inquiries respecting a~"plication prostatus or structure <e.g., overall invest(2) Wise development and conservacedures, (3) in pro-application confer
ment program or holdings) ; to personnel tion of natural resources, including land, ences, or (4 l ~Y other means which will<e.g., personal historles of project omwater, mineral, wildlife, and others; 
assure earli"'st ront~ct between applicantcersl or may involve proprietary infor(3) Balanced transportation systems, and cle:uinghol'""S.
mation <e.g., industrial processes, reincluding highway, air, water, pedesb. Assuring that llll apnlications forsearch ideas) . Such confidential infortrian, mass transit, and other modes for assistance und~r pro<>'rams covered bymation need not be included with applithe movement of people and goods; this part have re~n submitted to appro
cations submitted to clearinghouses for (4) Adequate outdoor recreation and priate clearinghnu~es for review 'prior
review. open space; 
to their suhmi~~<ion to the funding
f. Applicants will include with the com· (5) Protection of areas of unique agency. Anrl'c"t.lons that do not carrypleted application as submitted to the natural beauty, historical and scientific evidence th?t )'lnt'ft l'Te!'wide and StateFederal agency <or to the State agency interest: 
cleftrin~rhO'l!les J'lave re!.'n given an op
in the case of projects for which the (6) Properly planned community faportunity to r~vhv the aprlication willState, under certain programs, has final cilities, including utilities for the supply be returned t..., the apl'Iicant with inproject approvall: of power, water, and communications, structions tt} fulfill the requirements of<1 l All comments and recommendafor the safe disposal of wastes, and for this Part. Agel'ri"s wfll !:!'sure that all
tions made by or through clearinghouses, other purposes: and applicfl.tion~ ro,.,t~tl'l r. State Anpllcattonalong with a statement that such com<7l Concern for high standards of 
Identifier <SATl l'l•mh~>r. <'l'hfs is manments have been considered prior to subdesign. 
datory for Pse in not'fying clearinghousesmission of the application: or d. As provided under section 102(2) of actinn taken o.... the ppplication.l
<2l Where no comments have been <Cl of the National Environmental c. Notifying s11rh clpprfnrhouses withinreceived from a clearinghouse, a statePolicy Act of 1969, the extent to which seven workin~t days of any major action
ment that the procedures outlined in the project significantly affects the entaken on such fl.npli~.flt1 ons that havethis section have been followed and that vironment including consideration of: been reviewed r:v s<~irl rl:!arlnghouses.
no comments or recommendations have (1) The environmental impact of the MaJor actions wl'l include awards, rebeen received. proposed proJect: 
jections, ret11rns f>Jr rm<>ndment, deferg, Applications for renewal or con(2) Any adverse environmental effects 
rals, or wfthctra,.rpl~. The standard mul
tinuation grants or applications not subwhich cannot be avoided should the protipurpose form, ElF 4'>."', prrmulgated bymitted to or acted on by the funding posed project be implemented; Federal ManMement ('"lrcular 74-7, will
agency within one year after completion <3l Alternatives to the proposed be used for this PUfP"SP unl~s a waiverof clearinghouse review will be subject to project; 
has been granted by OMB. <See Attachre-review upon request of the clearing(4) The relationship between local mentE.)
house. short term uses of man's environment d. Where a clearinghouse has recom
5. Subject matter of comments., and and the maintenance and enhancement 
mended against approval of an applicarecommendations. Comments and recof long term productivity; and tion or approval only with specific andommendations made by or through clear(5) Any irreversible and irretrievable major substantive changes, and theinghouses with respect to any project are commitments of resources which would funding agency approves the applicafor the purpose of assuring maximum be involved in the proposed proJect or tion substantiallv as submitted, theconsistency of such project with State, action, should it be implemented. 
funding agency wiH provide the clearing
areawide, and local comprehensive plans. e. Effects on energy resource supply house, along with the action notice, an
and demand.
They are also intended to assist the Fedexplanation therefor.
eral agency <or State agency, in the case f. The extent to which people or busie. Where a clearinghouse has recom

cf projects for which the State under nesses will be displaced and the availmended against approval of a project be
certain Federal grants has final project ability of relocation resources. cause it conflicts with or duplicates

g. As provided under section 307<dl of another Federal or federally assisted
approval) administering such a program the coastal Zone Management Act of project, the funding agency will consult 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976
D-4 
with the agency assisting the referenced projects prior to acting, if it plans to approve the application. 
f. Assuring, in the case of an appltcation submitted by a special purpose unit of local government, where accompanying comments indicate that the unit of general local government having jurisdiction over the area in which the project is to be located has submitted or plans to submit an application for assistance for the same or a similar type project, that appropriate considerations and preferences as specified in section 402 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, are accorded the unit of general local gov~rnment. Where such preference canot be so accorded, the agency shall supply, in writing, to the unit of general local government and the Office of Management and Budget its reasons therefor. 
7. Housing programs. For housing programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Veterans Administration, and the Farmers Home Administration of the Department of Agriculture the following procedures will be followed, except as provided in subparagraph d below: 
a. The appropriate HUD, VA, or USDA/FHA office will transmit to the appropriate State and areawide clearing
houses a copy of the initial application for project approval. 
b. Clearinghouses will have 39 days from receipt to review the applications and to forward to the HUD, VA, or USDA/FHA office any comments whi~h they may have, including observations concerning the consistency of the proposed project with State and areawide 
development plans, the extent to which the proposed project will provide housing opportunities for all segments of the 
community, and identification of major environmental concerns including impact on energy resource supply and demand. Processing of applications in the HUD, VA, or USDA/FHA office will proceed concurrently with the clearinghouse review. 
c. This procedure will include only ap
plications involving new construction or 
substantial rehabilitation and will apply 
to applications for loans, loan guaran
tees, mortgage insurance, or other hous
ing assistance: 
(1 > In Urbanized Areas, as defined by 
the U.S. Bureau of the Census <see Ap
pendix A, 1970 Census of Population, 
Characteristics of the Population or 
Characteristics of Housing>, to: 
(a) 
Subdivisions having 25 or more lots. 

(b) 
Multifamily projects having 50 or more dwelling units. 

(c) 
Mobile home courts with 50 or more spaces. 


<d> College housing provided under the debt service or direct loan programs for 200 or more students. 
(2) In all other areas, to: 
(a) Subdivisions having 10 or more lots. 
<bl Multifamily pr9jects having 25 or more dwelling units. 
NOTICES 

<c> Mobile home courts with 25 or n10re spaces.
(d) 
College housing provided under the debt service or direct loan programs for 100 or more students. 

d. 
As an alternative to the above procedure, the developer may submit his application directly to the appropriate clearinghouses prior to submitting it to the Federal agency. In such cases, the applicatiop, when submitted to the Federal agency, will be accompanied by the comments of the clearinghouses. 

e. 
Exemption: Applications for additional units in a subdivision substantially completed (i.e., with streets, water and sewer facilities, culverts, etc.> are exempted from this requirement -;hen: 


<1 > The subdivision was approved and/ or recorded by the appropriate unit of local government within tl:ree years of the application su)lmittal; and 
(2) In cases of subdivisions approved more than three years prior, the clearinghouses waive the requirement. 
This exemption does not apply to ap
plications for housing in an undeveloped subdivision or in proposed extensions of existing subdivisions. 
8. Coverage, exceptions, and variations. a. Generally, this Part of this Circular and the laws on which it is based are concerned with programs providing ft.o. nancial assistance to projects and activities which have an impact on State, areawide, and local development, including development of natural, economic, and 
human resources. This Part is concerned with achieving the most effective and efficient utilization of Federal assistance programs through coordination among and between Federal, multistate, State, areJ.wide, and local plans and programs and the elimination of conftict, overlap, and duplication of projects and activities under such programs. Coverage under this Part includes, or will be extended from time to time as deemed necessary and practicable to include programs bearing upon these concerns and objectives. 
b. Programs not considered appropriate to this Part are programs of the following types: 
<1 > Direct financial assistance to individuals or families for housing, welfare, health care services, education, training, economic improvement, and other direct assistance for individual and family enhancement. 
(2) 
Incentive payments or insurance for private sector activities not involving real property development or land use and development. 

(3) 
Agricultural crop supports or payments. 


(4) Assistance to organizations and 
institutions for the provision of education or training not designed to meet the needs of specific Individual States or localities. 
(5) Research, not involving capital constructi-on, which is national in scope or is not resigned to meet the needs or to address problems of a particular State, 
area, or locality <except in the case of 
Pam 210-4 

demonstration or pUot research programs where projects may have an impact on the community or area in which they are being conducted). 
(6) 
Assistance to educational, medical, or similar service institutions or agencies for internal staff development or management improvement purposes. 

(7) 
Assistance to educational, institutions for activities that are part of a school's regular academ)c program and are not related to local programs of health, welfare, employment, or other social services. 

(8) 
Assistance for construction involving only routine maintenance, repak, or minor construction which does not change the use or the scale or intensity of use of the structure or facility. 

c. 
OMB will consider Federal agency requests for exemption-of certain classes of proje"cts or activities under programs otherwise covered which: 

(1) 
Meet any of the above characteristics of programs inappropriate for coverage under this Part; 


<2> Are of small scale or size or are 

highly localized as to impact; or 
1
(3) 
Display other characteristics which might make review impractical. 

d. 
OMB will consider Federal agency requests for procedural variations from normal review processes: 

(1) 
On a temporary basis for programs with time constraints brought about because of start up requirements or other unusual circumstances beyond the control of the funding agency. <Note: Delay in fund availability is not normally an acceptable reason for a variation. When a delay is anticipated, applicants sl!J.ould be instructed to have their applicati-ons reviewed by clearinghouses in readiness for submission when funds become available.) 

(2) 
For programs where statutory or related procedural limitations make the normal review processes impracticable. 

e. 
All requests from Federal agencies for exemptions or procedural variations should be addressed to the Associate Director for Managc;ment and Operations, Office of Management and Budget. 

f. 
Indivi.dual clearinghouses may exeDnpt certain tyges oi projects fron1 review for reasons indicated above or for other reasons appropriate to the State or area. 


g. Applicants should be made aware 
that, in various States, State law requires review of applications for Federal assistance under various programs not covered by this Part. Implementation of such laws is enforced through State rules and regulations, and applicants are urged to ascertain the existence of such laws and to acquaint themselves with applicable State procedures. 
9. Joint Funding. Applications for assistance to activities under the Joint Funding. Simplification Act <P.L. 93510) or any other joint funding authority, which involve activities funded under one or more of the programs covered under this Part, will be subject to therequirements of this Part. 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESOAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
D -5 


Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
10. Agency procedures and regulations. ings and installations or other. Federal
a. Proposed agency procedures and reghouses had been provided a reasonable
public works or development or tor the time to comment and had failed to do so.
ulations for implementing the requireacquisition, use, and disposal' ot Federal · 3. Use of clearinghouses. The State
ments of this Part will be published in the 

·land and real property will establish and areawide planning and development
FEDERAL REGISTER as speclfted lr paraprocedures for: ciearlnghouses established pursuant ··to
graph 7 of this Circular. Programs to < 1 > Consulting with Governors, State
which '·"~procedures and regulations will Part I will be utlllzed to the greatest ex

and areawide clearinghouses, and local tent practicable to effectuate the require
apply ,•· r11 ·,e cited by their numbers In elected oftl.clals at the earliest practicable ments.of this Part. Agencies are urged to
the Cuiuiog of Federal Dpmestic Asstage In project or development planestablish early contact with clearing

sistance. Where such numbers have not
yet been assigned, programs will be refning on the relationship of any plan or houses to work out arrangements for
erenced by Public Law and section or by project to the development plans and carrying out the consultation and review
programs of the State, area, or locality

U.S. Code citation. Subsequent amendIn which the project Is to be located. In required under this Part, Including Iden
tification of types of projects consideredments to such procedures and regulations
will also be published pursuant to parathe case of projects In the National Capappropriate for consultation and review.
Ital Region, such consultation should be Clearinghouses may utlllze criteria set
graph 7 of the Circular. undertaken In cooperation with the the forth In paragraph 5 of Part I In eval
b. As a part of such proposed procNational CaPital Planning Commission. uating direct Federal development proJ
dures and regulations published In the <2> Assuring that any such Federal
FEDERAL REGISTJI:It, agencies may Identify ects.

plan or project Is consistent or compati4. Federal lice118es and nermits. Agenspecific types of projects which they beble with State, areawide, and local develcies responsible for gra.ntlng Federal 11lieve should be exempt from coverage
under programs for which proposed proopment plans and programs identified In censes and permits for development proj
the course of such consultations. Excepects and activities which would have acedures and regulations are being pubtions will be made only where there is significant Impact on State, Interstate,lished. Such publication will constitute clear justification. Explanation of any areawide, or local development plans ura formal request for exemption to the necessary Inconsistency or Incompatibil
Office of Management and Budget, to programs or on the environment are
Ity will be provided, In writing, to the stronglv urged to consult with State and
which it will respond in Its review of the appropriate clearinghouses. areawide clearinghouses and to seek their

proposed procedures and regulations.
c. OMB will assist and cooperate with <3> Providing State, areawide, and loevaluations of such Impacts prior to
ca.l agencies which are authorized to degranting such licenses or permits.
agencies in developing such procedures
and regulations. velop and enforce environmental stand5. A,qencv procedures a11d rertulations.
ards with adequate opportunity to review
d. A copy of agency internal procea. To the greatest extent ros~II>Ie, agen
such Federal plans and projects pursu
dures ~or implementation of this Part, cies engaroted In dll'ect FedeNtl develop
ant to section 102<2> <C> of the National ment actlvltie.'l will follow the general
If not contained in the above procedures Environmental Polley Act of 1969. Any procedures outlined nndPI' Pal't I of At
and regulations, will be sent to the AscommentS of such agencies will accom
sociate Director of the Office of Managetachm~nt A In affording State and area
pany the enl'ironmental Impact statewide clearlnghou~es oppartunlttes to rement and Budget for Management and ment submitted by the Federal agency.
Operations. view and comment on plans and
11. Re13orts and directories. a. The DI<4> Providing, In the case of projects deve!onments.
located In the coastal zone, the State
rector of the Office of Management and b. Where legislative or executive conBudget may require reports, from time to agency responsible for administration of stratnt.c; Ol' !'Plated l'i"C"Tt'l~t.nnces no T!ot
the approved program for the manage
time, on the implementation of this Part. permit followlnrot rruch nrocednl'f's, allenc:V
b. The omce of Management and ment of the coastal zone with opportuprocedure~ and re!Z'nlatlon<~ will set forthBudget will maintain and distribute to nity to review the relationship of the for each nrO<l'I'IIm. at a minimum: ~ 
•
propased proJect to such program and Its
appropriate Federal agencies a direc(1) The nolnt In nl't'lf"ct plannln~r ll,t
consistency therewith.
tory of State and areawide clearingwhld-1 r.lPnl'lncrhouReR vrfll he contl\cted;
<5> Providing, through the appropri
houses. C2l Thr ml'llmum time clP:ulnghouses
ate clearinghouses,
c. The omce or Management and Health Systems will be aH'orded to revl~w the nropo,;cdnudget will notify Federal Regional Agencies and State HeRlth Planning and prol..ct:
Development Agencies designated pursu
Councils, clearinghouses, and Federal (3l The mfnfmnm Information to beagencies of any excepted categories of ant to the National Health Planning and provl<iPil to the cl"Rrlnvhm•<"PS: ami
Resources Development Act of 1974 with
projects under covered prograxns. C4l Procetinre11 for notifYing clParlniZ'
adequate opportunity to review Federal hous"s nn nctfons hl.lr"n on St•ch nrnfectPART n: DIRECT FEDERAL DEVELOPMENT projects for construction and/or equip<lmnl"m"ntatfon, tlmlnl!'. no"'t.rtODP.m"nt,
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Part ment Involving capital expenditures exahn'ldonrn,.nt) anrl exnl!! lnln~ actions
is to: ceeding $200,000 for modernization, contakPn rnnt.l'ary to cleAringhouse recomr
a. Provide State and local government version, and expansion of Federal Inmenrlsttlon~.
with information on p~,:ojected Federal patient care fac1lities, which alter the c. The Office of MRnaaPment 11nddevelopment so as to facilitate coordinabed capacity or modify the primary funcBnrh;ret will con~ln"t ot.her nroc"rl"I'"S
tion with State, areawide, and local plans tion of the facility, as well as ple.ns for such 1111 '""mnra,.,nst ,.f lt"T"""""nt. he
provision of major new medical care
and programs. twePn FPr!Pral lnd,.ll~ttlons "'"" rlPRrlnr<"
b. Provide Federal agencies with Inforservices. <Excluded are projects to renhnn<"oos fnl' C"ol'ntnat.fn'! P,.APT'A.l ~tndmation on the relationship of proposed ovate or Install mechanical systems, air civllfPn nl..,nnfnu. th<>t """' ""~''<>ned to
conditioning systems, or other similar
direct Federal develop~nt projects and achfPV" th" nhf,.ctlveR of thl.o; PPI't.
activities to State, areawide, and local Internal system modifications.> The 
d. A11 TII'O"OS"rl ""'"'"'" nrnrerlnrp<; anrlplans and programs; and to.a.ssure maxiagencies are expected to evaluate prore~ulAt.lon• to fmnlom.,nt thlo; Part willmum feasible consistency of Federal deposed Federal projects for consistency be nnhJ!<"hPrl In th" li'P<IPI'Al 'R'oocrf~tor nnr~velopments with State, areawide, and lowith areawide and local health delivery ll"Rnt to rnl'!I"TR,nh 7 of the rl,.cnl~tr.cal plans and programs. plans and health supply-demand situaO'M'R will a~~fqt And coonerate with agr.n
c. Provide Federal agencies with Infortions, as well aa considering clearingcles 1'1 dPveloplng such procedures andmation on the possible Impact on the enhouse comments on such speciftc points reg11Jatlons.
vironment of proposed Federal developas those listed 1n paragraph 5 of Part I.ment. The comments of such agencies and any PART m: STATE PLANS
2. Coordination of direct Federal declearinghouse comments wlll accompany 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Partvelopment projects with State, areawide, the plan and budget requests submitted Is to provide Federal agencies with In"
and local development. a. Federal agenby the Federal agency to the Office of formation about the relationship to State,cies having responslbtlity for the planManagement and Budget or a certificaor areawide compreherlsive planning ot'ning and construction of Federal buildtion that the agencies and clearing-State plans which are required or form 
•
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
D-6 
Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 

• 
the basis for fund1111 under VJ',rioua :Fed.e'ral prO!fl'&IBI. 
%. State plans. To the extent not presently required by s\atute or administra· tive regulation, Federal agencies admln· istering programs requiring b1 statute 
or regulation a State plan as a co,tdition of assistance under s11ch programs wlll require that the Governor, or his dele· gated agency, be given the opportunity to comment on the relationship of such State plan to comprehensive and other State plans and programs and to those of affected areawide or local jurisdictions. The Governor is urged to involve areawide clearinghouses in the review of State plana, particularly where such plans have speciflc applicability to or affect areawide or local plans and programs. 
a. 
The Governor will be afforded a period of 45 days in which to make such commenta, and any such comments w111 be transmitted with the plan. 

b. 
A "State plan" under this Part is defined to include any required supporting planning reports or documentation that htdicate the programs, proiects; and activities for which Federal fuhds w111 be utilized. Such reports or documentation will also be submitted for review at the request of the Governor or the agency he has designated to perform 


review under this Part. 
c. Programs requiring State plans are listed in Appendix n of the Catafog of Federal Domestic Assistance. 
PART IV: COORDINATION OF PLANNING IK MULTIJURISDICTIONAL AREAS 
1. Policies and objectit'es. The purposes of this Part are: 
a. 
To encourage and facilitate State and local initiative and responsibility in developing organizational and procedural arrangements for coordinating comprehensive and functional planning activities. 

b. 
To eliminate overlap, duplication, and competition in areawide planning activities assisted or required under Fed


eral programs and to encourage the most effective use of State and local resources availaole for planning. 
c. 
To minimize inconsistency among Federal administrative and approval requ1i"ements placed on areawide planning activities. 

d. 
To encourage the States to exercise leadership in delineating and establishing a system of planning and development districts or regions in each State, which can provide a consistent geographic, base for the planning and coordination of Federal, State, and local development programs. 

e. 
To encourage Federal agencies administering programs assisting or requiring areawide planning to utilize agencies that have been designated to perform areawide comprehensive planning In planning and development districta or regions established pursuant to subparagraph d above (generally, areawide clearinghouses designated pursuant to Part I of Attachment A of this Circular> to calTJ' out or coordinate planning 


under auch programs. In the case of Interstate metropoll~ areas, &&"etlciel deslgriated as metropolitan areawide clearinghouses should be utWzed to the 

extent possible to carry out or coordinate Federall7 assisted or required areawide planning. 
2. Common or consistent planning and development district$ or regions. a. Prior to the designation or redesignation <or approval thereof> of any planning and development district or region under any Federal program, Federal agency procedures will provide a period of 30 days for the Governor<s> of the State<s> in which the district or region· will be located to review the boundaries thereof and comment upon its relationship to planning and development .distr~cts or regions established by the State. Where the State has established such planning and development districts, the bound
. aries of areas designated under Federal programs will conform to them unless there is clear justification for not doing so. 
b. Where the State has not established planning and development districts or regions which provide a basis 
for evaluation of the boundaries of the area Proposed for designation, major units of general local government and the appropriate Federal Regional Council in such areas will also be consulted prior to designation of the area to assure consistency with districts established under inter-local agreement and 
under related Federal programs. 
c. The omce of Management and Budget will be notified through the appropriate Federal Regional Council by Federal agencies of any proposed designation and will be informed of such designation when it is made, including such justifications as may be required under subparagraph a above. 
3. Common and consistent planning bases and coordination of related activities in multiiurisdictional areas. Each agency will develop procedures and requirements for applications for multijurisdictional planning and development 
assistance under appropriate programs to assure the fullest consistency and coordination with relatEd planning and development being carried on by the areawide comprehensive planning agency or .clearinghouse designated under Part I of this Circular in the multi.iurisdictional area. 
Such procedures shall include provision for submission to the funding 
agency by any applicant for multijurisdictional planning assistance, if the applicant is other than an areawide comprehensive planning agency referred to in paragraph le of th-is Part, of a memorandum of agreement between the applicant and such areawide comprehensive planning agency covering the means ·by which their planning act!vities will be 
coordinated. The agreement will cover but need not be limited to the following matters: 
a. Identiflcatlon of relationships between the planning proposed by the applicant and that of the areawide agency 

and of similar or related activities ~bot will require coordination; 
b. 
The organizational and procedural arrangements for coordinating such activities, such as: Overlapping board membership, procedures for joint reviews of projected activities and policies, information exchange, etc.; 

c. 
"Cooperative arrangements for shar



ing planning resources <funds, personnel. facilities, and services> : 
d. Agreed upon base data, statistics, and projections <social, economic, demographic) on the basis of which plannini 
in the area will proceed. 
Where an aprlicant has been unable to effectuate such an agreement, he will submit a statement indicating the efforts he has made to secure agreement and the issues that have prevented it. In such case, the funding agency,in consultation with the Federal Regional Council and the State clearinghouse designated under Part I, wm undertake, within a 30 days period after receipt of the application, resolution of the issues before approving the application, if it is otherwise in good order. 
4. 
Joint funding. Where it will enhance the quality, comprehensive scope, and coordination of planning in multijurisdictional areas, Federal agencies will, to the extent practicable, provide for joint funding of planning activities being carried on therein. 

5. 
Coordination of agency procedures and regulations. With respect to the steps called for in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Part, departments and agencies will develop for relevant programs appropriate draft procedures and regulations which will be published in the FEDERAL REGISTER pursuant to paragraph 7 of this Circular. Copies of such drafts will be furnished to the Director of the omce of Management and Budget and to the heads of departments and agencies admini>tering related programs. The omce, in consultation with the agencies, will review the draft procedures and regulations to assure the maximum obtainable consistency among them. 


PART V: DEFINITIONS 
Term used in this Circular w111 have following meanings: 
1. 
Federal agency-any department, agency, or instrumer.tality in the executivt branch of the Government and any wholly owned Government corporation. 

2. 
State-any of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, or any agency or instrumentality of a State, but does not include the governments of the political subdivisions of the State. 

3. 
Unit of general local government-any city, county, town, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State. 

4. 
Special purpose unit of local government-any special district, public purpose corporation, or other strictlY limited purpose political subdivision of a 



FEDERAl REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
D -7 


Pam 210-4 
NOTJCES. 
State, but shall not include a school 	planning agency designated by the Gov
district. 	ment to which the· appllcation has been
ernor (or Governors in the case of re-	submitted for review, and <B> by a state
5. F¢deral assistance, Federal financial 
glans extending into more than one.
assistdnce, Federal assistance program, 	ment by the appllcant that such com•
State) or by State law to carry, out. 	ments and recommendations have been
orfedqally assisted programs-programs requirements of this Circular; or considered prior to formal submission
that pY.ovide assistance through grant or 

<2> In metropolitan areas an. area-of the application. Such comments shallcontractual arrangements. They include 
wide agency that has been recogniiJed by 	include information concerning the extechnical assistance :>rograms, or pro
grams.providing assistance in the form 	the Office of Management and Budget tent to which the project is consistent
as an appropriate agency to perform 	with comprehensive planning developedof lomis, loan guarantees, or insurance.
'l'he term docs not include any annual 	review functions under section 204 of o1· in the process of development for the
paymc11 L hy the United States to the 	the Demonstration Cities and Metropoll-metropolita~ area or the unit of general
tan Development Aot of 1966, Title IV of local ~rovernment, u the case may be,

Distrir't of Columbia authorized by ar	the Interlfovernmentnl Cooperation Act
ticle VI o[ ttw District of ColwnlJiu Rev	and the extent to which such project
of 1968, and this Circular. contributes to the fulfillment of iuch
euuc A"L of 1047 <D.C. Colle sec. 47-11. Multiiurisdictconal area-any geo-planning, The comments and recom

250l:t nml 47-250lb\. 
grapbical area comprising, encompas-	mendatlons and the statement referred6. Funding agency. The Federal agency 
sing, or extending into more than one 	to in this paragraph shall, except in theor, in the case of certain formula grant
programs, the State agency which is re	unit of general local government. case referred to in paragraph (2) of this
12. Planning and development district subsection, be reviewed by the agency ofsponsible for final approval of appllca
or region--a multUurisdictlonal area 	the Federal Government to which suchtions for assistanct.
7. Comprehensive planning, to the exthat has been formally designated or application is submitted for the sole
recognized as an appropriate area for 	purpose of assisting it in determlnJngtent directly related to area needs or
needs of a unit of general local govern	planning under State law or Federal pro-whether the application is in accordance
gram requirements. 	with the provisions of Federal law whichment, including the following:
a. Preparation, as a guide for govern13. Direct Federal development-plan-govern the making of the loans or grants.
ning and construction of public works, "(2) An application for a Federal loan

mental''pollcies and action, of general
plans with respect to: 	physical facil1tles, and installations or or grant need not be accompanied hy
<1> Pattern and intensity of land use, land and real property development <in-the comments and recommendations and
eluding the acquisition, use, and disposal 	the statements referred to in paragraph(2) Provision of public facUlties <inof real property> undertaken by or for
cluding · transportation facUlties> and 	b<ll of this subsection, if the applicant
other government services. 	the use of the Federal Government or certifies that a plan or description of
<3> Effective development and ut1Ilzaany of its agencies; or the leasing of real the proJect, meeting the requirements of
tion of hwnan and natural resources. property for Federal use where the use such rules and regulations as may be
or intensity of use of such property will prescribed under subsection <c> . or such

b. Preparation of long range physical 
be substantially altered. 	application, has lain before an approand fiscal plans for such action.
c. Programming of capital improve	priate areawide agency or instrumental-
ATTACHMENT B--CIRC'D'LAR No. A-95 ity or unit of general local government
ments and other major expenditures, 	REVISED
based on a determination of related ur	for a period of slxt:v days without com
gency, together with definitive financing Secbfon 204 of the Demonstration Cities ments or recommendations thereon beingplans for such expenditures in the earlier and Metropolitan Development Act of made by such agency or instrumentality.years of the program. 1966 as amended <80 Stat. 1263, 82 "<3> The requirements of paragraphs
sta.t. 208> 	(1) and <2>
d. Coordination of all related plans and 	shall also apply to any 
•
activities of the State and local govern	amendment of ·the application which,
"Sec. 204. <a> All applications made in light of the purposes of this title, in
ments and agencies concerned. 	after June 30, 1967, for Federal loans or valves a major change in the proJect cov-'e. Preparation of regulatory and ad
grants to assist in carrying out open-	ered by the application prior to such
ministrative measures in support of the space land projects or for planning or amendment. ·foregOinl. construction of hospitals, airports, "<c> The Bureau of the Budget, or
8. Metropolitan area-a standard metlibraries, water supply and distribution such other agency as may be designatedropolitan statistical area as established fac111tles, sewage fac1llties and waste by the President, 1s hereby authorized
by the Office of Management and Budg
treatment works, highways, transporta-	to prescribe such rules and rE>gulationsl
et, subject, however, to such modification facUlties, low enforcement faclUtles, as are deemed appropriate for the effections and extensions as the Office of and water development and land con-tive administration of this section."
Management and Budget may determine servation projects within nny metroto be appropriate for the purposes of politan area shall be SUbmitted for TrrLE IV OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CO

section 204 of the Demonstration Cities revieW-OPERATION ACT OF 1988 (82 STAT. 1103)and Metropolitan Development Act . of 
"<1> to any areawide agency which is "Title IV-Coordinated Intergovernmen1966, and these Regulations. 
designated to perform metropolitan or . tal Poltcu and Administration of De
9. A·reawide--Comprising, in metroregional planning for the area within 
velopment Assistance Programs"
polltan areas, the whole of contiguous which the assistance is to be used, andurban and urbanizing areas; and in nonwhich is, to the greatest practicable ex-''Declaration of development assistancemetropolitan areas, contiguous counties tent, composed of or responsible fx> the policy"or other multljurisdi.::tional areas havelected omcials of a unit of areawide gov
"Sec. 401. <a> The economic and social
ing common or related social, economic, 	ernment or of the units of general local development of the Nation and the
or physical characteristics indicating a government within whose Jurisdiction achievement of satisfactory levels of Iivcommunity of developmental interests; such ageney Is authoriZed to engage In 1ng depend upon the sound and orderly
or, in eitqer, the area included in a sub	such planning, and development of all areas, both urban
state district designated pursuant to "(2) if· made by a special purpose unit and rural. Moreover, in a time of rapidparagraph 1d, Part IV, Attachment A of of local government, to the unit or· units urbanization, the sound and orderly dethis Circular. of general local government with au• velopment of urban communities de
10. Planning and development clearthorit:v to operate In the area within pends to a large degree upon the socialinghouse ar clearinghouse includes: which the.project is to be located. and economic health and the sound de
a. "State clearinghouse"--an agency of 
"<b> <1> Except as provided in para-velopment of small communities and
the State Government designated by the 	graph <2> of this subsection, each ap-rural areas. The President shall, there
Governor or by State law to carry out 
plication shall be accompanied <A> by 	fore, establish rules and regulations gov
the requirements of Part I of Attach	the comments and recommendations
ment A of this Circular. 	with respect to the proJect involved by emlng the formulation, evaluation, and
b. "Areawide clearinqhouse"-<1) In the areawide agency and governing bod-review of Federal programs and projects
nonmetropollt.an area:< a comprehensive 	les of the units of general local govern-having a significant impact on area and 
•
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, 	JANUARY 13, 1976
D-8 
Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 

• 

• 

community development, including programs providing Federal assistance to the States and localities, to the end that they shall most effectively serve these basic objectives. Such rules and regula
tions shall provide for full consideration of the concurrent achievement of the following specific objectives and, to the extent authorized by law, reasoned choices shall be made between such objectives when they conflict: 
"(1) Appropriate land uses for housing, commercial, industrial, governmental, institutional, and other purposes; 
"<2> Wise development and conservation of natural resources, including land, water, minerals, wildlife, and others: 
"(3) Balanced transportation systems, including highway, air, water, pedestrian, mass transit, and other modes for the movement of people and goods; 
"(4) Adequate outdoor recreation and 
open space; .. 

"(5) Protection of areas of unique natural beauty, historical and scientific interest;
"(6) Properly planned community fa
cilities, including utilities for the supply 
of power, water, and communications, 
for the safe disposal of wastes, and for 
other purposes; and 

"(7) Concern for high standards of design.
"<'b> All viewpoints-national, regional, State and local-shall, to the extent possible, be fully considered and taken into account in planning Federal or federally assisted development programs and projects. State and local government objectives, together with the objectives of regional organizations shall be considered and evaluated within a 
framework of national public objectives, as expressed in Federal law, _and available projections of future national con
ditions and needs of regions, States, and localities shall be considered in plan formulation, evaluation, and review. 
"(c) To the maximum extent possible, consistent with national objectives, all Federal aid for development purposes shall be con!l!itent with and further the objectives of State, regional, and local comprehensive planning. Consideration 
shall be given to all developmental aspects of our total national community, including but not limited to housing, transportation, economic development, 
natural and human resources devel-:>pment, community faciltiies,"and the general improvement of living environments. 
"(d) Each Federal department and agency administering a development assistance program shall, to the maximum extent practicable, consult with and seek advice from all other significantly affected Federal departments and agencies in an effort to assure fully coordinated programs. 
"(e) Insofar as possible, systematic planning required by individual Federal programs <such as highway construction, urban renewal, .and open space> shall be coordinated with and, to the e:~mt au
thorized by law, made part of comprehensive local and areawide development planning." 
"Favoring units of general local government" 
"Sec. 402. Where Federal law provides that both special-purpose units of local government and units of general local government are eligible to receive loans or grants-in-aid, heads of Federal departments and agencies shallt in the absence of substantial_ reasons to the contrary, make such loans or grants-inaid to units of general local government rather than to special-purpose units of, local government." 
"Rules and regulations" 
"Sec. 403. The Bureau of the Budget, or such other· agency as may be designated by the President, is hereby authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations as are deemed appropriate for the effective administration of this title." 
ATTACHMENT C-CIRCULAR No. A-95 
REVISED 

SECTION 102 (2) (C) OF THE NATIONAL EN• VffiONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 (83 STAT. 853) · 
''Sec. 102. The Congress authorizes and directs that, to the fullest extent possible: {1) the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this Act, and <2> all agencies of the Federal Governmentshall-• • • 
"<C> include in every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and other major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement by the responsible official on
" m the environmental impact of the proposed action, 
"(it) any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented, 
"<iii> alternatives to the proposed action, 
"<iv) the relationship between local short-term use of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity, and 
"<v> any irreversible or irretrievable commitments of resources which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented. 
"Prior to making any detailed statement, the responsible Federal official shall consult with and obtain the i:omments of any.,jFederal agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any" environmental impact involved. Copies of such statement and the comments and views of the appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, which are authorized to develop and enforce environme-ntal standards, shall be made available to the President, the Council on Environmental Quality and to the public as provided by section 552 of Title 5, United States Code, and shall accompany the proposal through the existing agency review processes; • • • ." 
ATTACHMENT D-CIRCULAB No. A--95 
REVISED 

f"!overage ot Programs Under Attachment A, Part I 
1. Prog.rams liSted below are referenced several ways, due to transitional phases in program development, funding status, etc. Generally, citations are to programs as they are listed in the June, 
1975 Catalog of Federal Domestfc Assistance. For certain new legislation, Catalog citations have not yet been develonecl. In such cases, references are 'to Public Law number and section. When no funding is available for a program, it 1s not generallv H~teo jn t-hP. f"!tttal"l1 Ol" this Ath:~chment; but if funding becomes available for a program previously covered, it continues to. be covered unlesS specificallY. exempted by OMB. The Catalog is issued annually and revised periodically during the year. Every etiort w1ll be made to keep Appendix I and Attachment D current. Reference should alwa:vs be made to the one bearing the latest issue date. <However, the update to the 1975 Catalog will not reflect all the changes herein. Therefore, this list should be referenced 
until issuance of the 1976 Catalog.) 
Asterisks indicate certain State for
mula 	grant programs requiring state 
plans which !Ire also covered under Part 
m. When listed under Part I, reference is to applications for rubgrants under the State allocation, not to the State's application for its allocation under the formula JITant which is reviewable under Partni. 
2. Heads of Federal departments and 
a~enr.loc; mAv. with t.ho ronr,,.t"~"l)" f"'f the Office of Management and Budget, exclude certain categories of projects or 
activities under listed programs from the requirements of Attachment A, Part I. 
:Also see Part I, paragraph 8.> 
3. 	covere~ programs: 
Depar_tmen of Agriculture 

10.405 	Pann L&bor Bo11S1Dg Loa1111 &lid Grants. 
10.409 	Irrigation, Drainage, and Other Soil and Water Consenatlon Loans. (Exception: Loans to graztng uaoclatlons to develop addWODal pasturage and loans for purchase of equipment.) 
10.410 	Low to Mod.erate Income Housing Loans. 
10.411 Rural Housing BiteLoans. 
10.414 	Resource Consenatton and Development Loans. 
10.415 Rural Rental Housing Loans. 
10.418 	Water and waste Disposal Syliams for Rural Communities. 
10.419 	Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Loans. 
10.420 	Rural Self-Help Houalng Technical Assistance. 
10.422 	;Business and Industrtal Development Loans. (Ell:ceptlon: Lor,ns to rural small businesses having no atgnlftcant impact outside communtt:v ID which located.) 
10.423 Community Fac111tles Loans. 
10.424 lnd\l.&trlal Development Grants. 
10.658 	Cooperative Forest Insect and Disease Control. 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1t76 
D -	9 
Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
10.901 	Resources Conservation and Devel-18.369 Nursing School Ooutruotlon
opment. (Exception: Small proJLoan 	14.106 Interest Bubllld:y-Homes for LolfW
Guarantees and Interest
ects costing under $7500 for ero	Income PamUies.
Subsidies. 
14.112 	Mortgage Insurance-construction
sion and 	sediment control and 13.378 Health Professions Teaching Pac:U
land etabUizatton and for reha• 	or Rehabllltatlon of Condomln
ltle-Loan Guarantees and In
bllltatlon and consolidation of exterest Subeldles. 14.116 lum Projects.
t.stlng Irrigation systems.) 	Mortgage Insurance-De-velopment
18.392 	Oancer--Conatructlon.
10.904 	Watershed Protection and Flood 18.400° Adult Education-Grants to States. of Sales-Type Cooperative ProJ
ects. 	·
Prevention. 	18.401 Adult Educatlon-8pectal Projects.
Department of Commerce 13.408° Construction of Publlc Libraries. 14.116 Mortgage Insurance-Group Pre,etlce FacUlties.
18.421 	Educational Personnel 
Training 	14.117 Mortgage Insurance-Homes.
11.300 	Economic Development -Grants Grante-career Opportunities. 14.118
and Loans for Public Works and 18.427 Educationally Deprived ChildrenMortgage Insurance--Homes ~r

Certlll.ed Veterans.
Development Facilities. 	Handicapped.
Economic 	14.119 Mortgage Insurance--Homes for D,ts
11.302 	Development-Support 13.428• Educationally Deprived ChUdren
for Planning Organizations. Local Educational Agencies. aster Vlctlme. 

11.303 	Economic Development--Technical 18.429• Educationally Deprived ChUdren14.120 Mortgage IllBUJ'ance--B:omes for Low
Assistance. Mlgrants. and Moderate Income Families.

11.304 	Economic Development--Public 18.438 Follow Through. 14.121 Mortgage Insurance-Homes tn Out
IJ'lng Areas.
Works Impact Projects (Proce18.464• Library Services-Grants for Public 	.
dural variation). 	Libraries. 14.122 Mortgage Insurance--Homes In Ur
11.305 	Economic Development--State and 18.477 School ABBlstance In Federally Af· 14.124 ban Renewal Areas.
Local 	Mortgage Insurance-Investor
Economic Development fected Areas-construction.
Planning. 	18.498• Vocational Education ·Basic 14.126 Sponsored Cooperative Houslllg.
11.306 	Economic Development-District Grants to States. Mortgage Insurance-Land Develop
Operational Assistance. 18.494• 	ment and New Communities.
Vocational Eclucatlon--Oonsumer
11.307 	Economic Development--Special and Homemaking. 14.126 Mortp.ge Insurance--Management
Economic Development and Ad18.496• Vocational Education-cooperative Type Cooperative Projects.

Justment Assistance Program. Education. 	14.127 Mortgage IIUJUJ'ILnce-:Moblle Home
11.308 	Grants to States for Supplemental 18.499• Vocational Education -Special Parks.
and Baste Funding of Title I, II. 	14.128 Mortgage Insurance-Hospital&.
Needs..
and IV Activities. (Baste grants 	14.129 Mortgage Insurance--NursiJ:tg
13.601° Vocational Education-Work Study.only.) 13.602° Vocational Education-Innovation; Homes and Related Care Pacllltles.
11.406 	Anadromous and Great Lakes FishSupplementary 14.184 Mortgage Insurance-Rental Hou~
18.616 Educational Ceneries Development. ters· and Services--Special Protng. 

11.407 Commercial Fisheries Research and 	14.136 Mortgage InauJ'!Lnce-Rental Hou~·
grams and ProjectH.
Development. 	13.519• Supplementary Educational Centers lng for Moderate Income Families.
11.418 	Coastal Zone Management Program 14.137 Mortgage Ynsurance-Rental Hous·
and services. Guidance, Counsel
Development. 	lng for Low and Moderate Income
Ing, and Testing.
11.419 	Coastal Zone Management Program 18.620 Special Programs for Chlldren with Famllle~. Market Interest Rate.
Administration. 	14.138 Mortgage Inorurance-Rental Houa
Specific Learning DtsabUitles.
11.420 Coastal Zone Me.nagement-Estua18.622 Environmental Education. ln~t for the Elderly.rtne Sanctuaries. 13.648 Educational Opportunity Centers. 14.139 Mortgage Ineurilnce-Rental Hous• 
Department of Defense 18.670° Llbrartes and Learning Resources. lng In Urban Renewal Areas.
14.141 .Non.,roll.t Housing Sponsor Loans
18.600 	Child Development--Head Start.
12.101 	Beach Erosion Control Project!;. 13.612 Np.tlve American Programs. Plannl"g Projects for Low and
12.106 	Flood Control Projects. 13.623 Runaway Youth. Moderate .Income Families.
12.107 	Navigation Projects. 13.624° Rehabllltatlon Services and Fnci14.146 Pu·bllc Hous'DII' -Acquisition.
12.108 	Snagging and Clearing tor Flood Utles-Ba.slc Support. (Tumll:ey and Conventional Procontrol. 13.626 Rehabllltatlon Services and PacU1-duction Methods.) (New colf· Department Of Health, Ed·ucation, and ttes-8peclal Projects. atructlon only.)
14.140 	Rent Suo,.,lement&-Rental Housing
Welfare 18.628 Chlld Development-child Abuseand Neglect Prevention 1\nd Treatfor Lower Ineome Families.
13.210° comprehensive Publlc Health Serv· ment. 14.164 Kortsage Insurance--ExperimentalIces-Formula Grants. Rental Ho\1sln~.
13.680• 	Development•\! DIH!Lbllttlf's-BMic
13.211• 	Crippled ChUdren's Servlm••· Support. 14.1118 Lower Income Housing Aaalstanee
13.217• 	Fnmlly Planning Projects. Progl'l\m.
18.681 	Developmentl\1 DIH!LbllHit·"'· .special
13.224 	HealtllServl<".es Developmt~nt-ProJ· ProjeotR. 1o1.21l3 Com.prehenslvc Plannlu!! ARR!Htrmct!.e"t OrantR. 13.!53:1° 14.207 New Communltle&-Loau GmlrAn
Special Pro11ri\JnH J'ur t.J•e Aging18.232° Maternal und Child Henltll Scrvleee. State Ageucy Ael.lvltleR and Area. teetS.
18.236 	Drug Abu•e CommunHy Service 14.218 eommunltJ' Development Bloc!!:
Planning Rlld SociAl Services
Programs. 	Grant.-Entltlement Grantll.
Prognms.
13.237 	Mental Health-·llospltal Improve· 13.8M 1f.219 Community De-velopment Blooll:
Aging Programs Title III, Section
ment Gre.n·ts. 	Grante--Diacrettonarr Grants.
308, :Model Projects.
13.240 	:Mental Health-Community Mental 18.636• Special Programs for the Aglng14.702 state Disaster Preparecln-Grants.Health Centers. 
Nutrttlon Program for the Elderly. Dsparhnent of the Interior
18.246 	Migrant Health Grants. 16.636
18.261 	Alcohol-community Service ProPrograms for the Aglng-Reaearch 16.360
and Demonstration. 	0oa1 Mine Health and Safe-ty GrantR.
grams. 16.087• 	16.400• Outdoor Recreatlon-Aoquleltlon,
13.252 	Alcohol Demonstration Programs. Programs for the Aglng-Tral.J1lng, Development and Planning.
18.264 	Drug Abuse Demonstration Pro• p.L. 98-818: (Section 161) construe~ of 111;601 Irrigation Distribution Syat-'!t
Academic Facilities.
grams. 	Loans.
P.L. 98~41: (Section 1616) Planning Grants
18.256 	Otl\ce for Health Maintenance Or• 16.1103 Small Reclamation Projects.ganlzatlon (HMOS). to Health Systems Agencies: (Sec· 16.600 
Anadromous Pllh Conservation.13.268° National Health Servtce Corps. tlon 1601 et seq., Title XVI Public 111.604 Pllsh Restoration.
18.269 	Mental Health-children's Services. Health Service Act) Assistance for
modernization, construction or 18.611 Wildlife Reestoratlon.
18.260 	Famlly Planning Services-Training 111.904 Historic Preservation.
Grants. 	conversion of medical tacllltlee. 
13.261 	Famlly Health Centers. These programs wlll replace OCJtGDepclrlmnt ot JUBticeChlldhood Lead-Based Paint Poi-log 18.206, 18.220, 18.249, and
18.266 	18.268. 16.1100 Law Bnforoement Aall&tance-Oom•Aonlng Control. prehenalve Plannllll Grantll.
18.267 	Urban Rat Control. Department O/ Houdng and Urban 16.1101 Law Enforcement Allelstanoe-Dlll
13.268 	Disease control-Project Grnnt11. cntlonn.ry Grants.
Development
13.276 	Drug Abuse Education Programs. 18.1102• Law Enforcement ~
18.284 	Emergency Medical Servtces. 14.001 J'lood Insurance (Applications for proving and StrengthenlDf Law
18.286 	J,tmltntlon on F'ederal Partlclpntlon community ellglblllty). Enforcement and Orlmlnel .Jfor capital Expenditures. 14.108 Interest Reduction Payments• ,Iee.13.3411 l!t•a.lth Prof<'SHIOns Teaching FaclliRental and Cooperative Houslnl 16.611 Ortmlnnl Justice Syat8DII D&ftlop•U~R-Com<(.I'Ul,tlon Ora.nts. tor Lower Income Famltlee. -nt. 
•
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. I-TUESDAY, JANUARY U, 1976 
D -10 
Pam 210-4
NOTICES 
16.516 Law Enforcement Assistance-JuNational Science Foundation 
• 
venile Justice and Delinquency 
47.036 Intergovernmental Science.
Prevention-Allocation to States. 

16.517 	Law Enforcement Assistance Ad· New England RegiOnal Comm~ioa mlnistration-JJPD Special Em
48.002 New England Technical and Plan
phasis Prevention and Treatment. 

ning Assistance. Department of Labor (See note under Appalachian Regional Commission programs.)
17.211 Job Corps. 
17.226 Work Incentives Program (WIN). 
17.230 	Farm Workers. (Procedural variation.) 
17.232• 	Comprehensive Employment and Training Programs. 
Department of TransportatiOn 
20.102 Airport Development Aid Program. 
20.103 Airport Planning Grant Program. 
20.205 	Highway Research, Planning, and Construction. 
20.214 	Highway Beautification--control of Outdoor Advertising, Control of Junkyards, Landscaping and Scenic Enhancement. 
20.500 	Urban Mass Transportation Capital Improvement Grants. (Planning and construction only.) 
20.501 	Urban Mass Transportation Capital Improvement Loans. (Planning and construction only.) 
20.&05 	Urban Mass Transportation Technical Studies Grants. (Planning and construction only.) 
20.506 	Urban Mass Transportation Demonstration Grants. 
20.507 	Urban Mass Transportation Capital and Operating Assistance Formula Grants. 
Appalachian RegiOnal Commission 
23.003 	Appalachian Development Highway System. 
23.004 Appalachian Health Demonstration. 
23.005 	Appalachian Housing Planning Loan Fund. 
23.008 Appalachian Local Access Roads. 
23.010 Appalachian Mine Area Restoration. 
23.0J.l 	Appalachian State Research, Technical Assistance, and Demonstration Projects. 
23.012 	Appalachian Vocational Education Facl!lties and Operatlons. 
23.013 Appalachian Child Development. 
23.014 	Appalachian Housing Site Development and Office State Improvement Grants. 
23.016 	Appalachian Vocational Education and Technical Education Demononstratlon Grants. 
(NoTE.-Except for 23.011, administration of these grants Is not In the Commission but In the appropriate program agency--e.g., 
23.003 Is handled by DOT. For 23.002, Appalachian Supplements to Federal Grants-Inaid, which can provide all or any portion of the Federal contribution under certain defined grant-in-aid programs, coverage under Part I Is determined by the provisions applicable to the basic grant-In-aid program. For 28.003, 38.003, 48.003, 52.003, and 63.003-Reglonal Comml3slon Supplements to Federal Grants-in-aid-the same rule would 
apply.) 
Coastal Plains Regional Commission 
28.002 	Coastal Plains Technical and Planning Assistance. 
(See note under Appalachian Regional Commission programs.) 
Four Corners Regional Commission 
38.002 	Four Corners Technical and Planning Assistance. 
(See note under Appalachian Regional Commission programs.) 
Community Services Admmistration 
49.002 Community Action. 
49.010 	Older Persons Opportunities and Services. 
49.011 Community Economic Development. 
Ozarks Regional Commission 
52.002 	Ozarks Technical and Planning Assistance. 
(See note under Appalachian Regional Commission programs.) 
Upper Great Lakes Regional CommissiOn 
63.002 	Upper Great Lakes Technical and Planning Assistance. 
(See note under Appalachian Regional Commission programs.) 
Veterans Administration 
64.005 	Grants to States for Construction of State Nursing Home Care Fac111ties. 
64.017 	Grants to States for Remodeltng of State Home Hospltal;Domlclllary Fac111tles. 
64.0:j0 	Assistance In the Establishment of New State Medical Schools. 
64.021 	Grants to Affiliated Medical Schools-Assistance to Health Manpower Training Institutes. 
64.114 	Veterans Housing-Guaranteed and Insured Loans (GI Home Loans), 
Water Resources Council 
65.001 Water Resources Planning. 
Environmental Protection Agencv 
66.001 	Air Pollution Control Program Grants. 
66.005 	Air Pollution Survey and Demonstratton Grants. 
66.027 Soltd Waste Planning Grants. 
66.028 Solid Waste Demonstration Grants. 
66.418 	Construction Grants for Wastewater Treatment Works. 
66.419 	Water Pollution Control-State and Interstate Program Grants. 
66.426 	Water Pollution Control-Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Grants. 
66.432 	Grants for State Public Water System Subdivision Programs. 
66.433 	Grants for Underground Injection Control Programs. 
66.505 	Water Pollution Control Demonstration Grants. 
66.506 	Safe Drinking Water Research and Demonstration Grants. (Demonstration only). 
66.600 	Environmental Protection--consolidated Program Grants. 
66;602 	Environmental · Protection--consolidated Special Purpose Grante. 
ActiOn 
72.001 Foster Grandparents. 
72.002 Retired Senior Volunteer Program. 
72.008 The Senior Companion Program. 
Old Western Regional Commission 
75.002 	Old West Technical and Planning Assistance. 
Pacific Northwest Regional Commission 
76.002 	Pacific Northwest Technical and Planning Assistance Regulations. 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANU,~RY 13, 1976 
D -.11 


Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
Attachment E 
OMB ApprovoJ.,Na 29-R0211
o. IIUMBER
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. APPLI· J. STATE o. ftUMBEJI 
CANTS A .... LICA-

J, TYPE 	1-----·---1TION
0 PR£APPLICATION APPLI· •• DATI:
OF IOENTI• .. DATE
ACTION 0 APPLICAliON CATION Y•or •owl~ A1 FIER

19 	ASSIGNED
(Jfark dp. 	19 
JWOJ'T'i4t• 0 NOTIFICATION OF INTENT (Opt.) Lrotre
bocl 

0 REPORT Of FEDE~l ACTION Blulc 
4. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT II. FtDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO,
1. Appllcaftl fftme · : 
t.. Otcenll•llon Unit : c--·--r-------·-·-------·-
o. Stroot/P.O. lol : 
.. 
PRO· o:...N'!_M'!_ER___j I I• I IJ_j
4. Cltr : 	•. c:...., : 
GRAM b. TITLE 
I. Slott : 	(FrorK
•• liP Code: 
Pedual
b. C.n..cl Ponon (N•Mt 
Catcolog)
J! .t Celt!pltoa• No.) :

il ~~AND DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANT"S PROJECT I. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT
B 	A-Slate H-Community Action A1tncr
B-lnt~rstale J-H.ichtr Eduttliontl InstitutionC-Suttsteto ~lndi<~n Tribe
Ol•trict K..Othtr (Spni/JI) :
D-C.untr
E--cu,
f-Schoo' District
W.pecial PurposeDi1trict E"ter a.ppropriatc leUn 
0
r;:-r;Pii DF ASSISTANCE
i 
~Batie Chant D-lnsurtnte8-Sup;:-lemenlal Crtnt E-Othll 
~loan
11D, AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT IN•-• •l•illoo, -nfi••· 11. ESTIMATED NUM· 1?.. T\"Pf. OF APPLICAYION
Stat... etc.) 
BEA OF PERSONS A-f\N C-Rft'islon E"""'ur.,entltlonBENEFITING &-Renewal D-Contlnuatloa
. .Bnhr AJ)JJroprilat• l•tterr-.,.13:-.--P-R_O_PO_S_E_D__F_U_N_D_I_N_G____I_4_._C_O_N_G_R_E_S_SI_O_N_A_L_D_I_ST.._R_I_C_T_S_O_F:------·15. TYPE OF CHANGr; V'or Ho or II•I 0 
b. 	PROJECT ------· ::~nec:rct~~~~ ~o~~~~~~ r-othcr (Sp•ci/11):C-lr.creue Duration
r:...:.::c;..:=~t--------."':"-f-:1-:6-:.-:P-:R-:0-:J-::E-C::T-:1-:T:-A-:R:=T--f-1-::7-.-P--R-0-J-EC-.,T-:----·-tg:.;;::l~j;~;rat;on
r'-=-="-~1--------=-j 
DATE l'cor mont.\ dor DURATION 
B11t•r .,,,., 
r-r--IJ
•00 19 
Jlo.CA. 
-~at•l.ttn(a} ~b_~;..·
r'-"-="--f-~~--~~~--~~~--~~~..:c:.:·O~O~~II.:-r=ET::C~7-:'t-:"B-::TM:=E-::/h-D:-l':-oT:-1:-o::T-::O...l...-~y-:-.-.,--m-o-nl-"l\=da=v'--J-:I-:-9-.-::E-:~-:IS::T::-IN-:-::G-F:-[..1):-CJlA.::L IOENTIFICATION NUI\t.BER
.00 FEDERAL AGENCY ... 19
~~~~~----------~~--------------------·----
20. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Nom•, Citr, Stat., ZIP eod•l 
•
22. 1. To tftt Hst of my tnowled11 1nd belief.
i! d1l1 In this PrMPPiitation/epplfcatlon ,,.
THE lrue 1nd correct. th1 document lan Min
APPLICANT dul, outhorilod b, tho IOvtmlnc ..., of
! 
CERTIFIES 
U.o oppllc..t ond tho OPPiiOinl will -Pir (I) 0 0
THAT... 

wit-tho ollochod o""ranc• II U.o --(2) 	0 0 
' onco lo •••""'""· 
•-~------+-~~~~~~~~--------~'3~'-----.~~~~---------------------r~~~==~----~~
0 0
23, a. TTPlD NAME AND TITLE b. SIGNATURE
~ CERTIFYING c. DATE SIGNED
Y•r ....,.fA

i =~~~!~IVE 	dav 
19
24. AGENCY NAME ~~cli:I'PLICA· r .... -ncA dar 
RECEIVED 19211. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 
27, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 
28. FEDERAL APPLICATION
II 	IDENTIFICATION
§ 21. ADDRESS 
30, FEDERAL GRANT
IDENTIFICATION 

31. ACTION TAKEN 32. FUNDING
I 	J4, l'Mr •o•tA ""•
0 o. AWARDEO 	STARTING
~ a. FEDERAL 	.00 33. ACTIO;:N;;:;D;:_:Ac.;T::£::... DATE
;:-::::1::9:.--:::::::-:::--:::=:-:::-::--!-7-~:.__!~-----
0 b. REJECTED b. APPLICANT 	19
.00 35. CONTACT FOR ADCITIONAL INFORMA·
~=.0.:.="'--+---------":=...j 	36.
liON (NGtM G'IC'J ltlll}hOUO RIUnhr)
0 c. RETURNED FOR c. STATE .00 	ENDING r ... '""""' dar 
AMENDMEIIT 	~-19
d. LDCAL
~ 	.00 
37. REMARKS ADDED
B 0 d. DEFERRED a. DTHER 	,00
0 o. WITHDRAWN
I ~~------~I·~~T~~~·~L-~~·~------~-00~~~--:-:-:--------~~~~-:-~~~~0
JL 	Yea []No
•· I• t.klna abow't action, lllf commtnls rKtl¥111 rrom cl"''"'"'"'" .,,. cen. •· FrDERAL AGENCY A-95 OfFICIAL
FEDERAL AGENCY tldlfld. II 11ancy mpon1e Ia 4n unCier ,nlaitnl ot Part 1, OMB Clrc-.ler A-15, CHam• eiiCI itltphont -.o.)

~~ h11 bttn or II ~Milne ftlldlo
A-411 ACTION 
ITANOARD FORM 424 PAQE 1 110-751l'r..criW •• GSA, l'oolorol .v...,_oal Cirnolar 14-1 
•
FEDERAl REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8--TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976
D -12 
Pam 210-4
NOTICES 
SE.CTJON IV-REMARKS (Pkue "'"""" Uae FOI*'Uem aumll,./rvmSeceione 1,11 orIll,ifoppUc®f•) 
STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 2 (lo-75) 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAV', JANUARY 13, 1976 
D -1 3 
Pam 210-4 
NOTK:ES 
GENERAl INSTRYGJ~
This is a multi-purpose standard" form. First, it will be used oy applicanfs as a requirecffacesheet for pre.
applications and applications submitted in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. Second, it willbe used by Federal agencies to report to Clearinghouses on major actions taken on arplications reviewed by
clearinghouses in accordance with OMS Circular A-95. Third, it wiil be used by Federal agencies to notifyStates of grants-in-aid awarded in accordance with Treasury Circular 1082. Fourth, it may be used, on an
optional basis, as a notification of intent from applic<Jnts to clearinghouses, as an early initial notice that Federalassistance is to be applied for (clearinghouse procedures will govern). 
APPUCANT PROCEDURES FOR SECTION I
Applicant will complete all items in Section I. If an item is· not applic~ble, write "NA": If additional space Is needed, Insertin asterisk "•", and use the remarks section on the bac!\ of the form. An explanation follows for each item: 
Item 
Item
1. 	Mark appropriate box. Pre-application and applicJ·
tlon guidance is in FMC 7/f-7 and Federal agency 0. Insurance. Self cxpl~natory. 
program inr.lructions. Notification of intent euirJ .. [. Other. EJ<plain on rernMks page.
anco is in Circular A-95 and Juoccdurcs from clr.iu~ 10. Govcrnmontal unit whcr" slr.niflcant and meaning.
lnghouse. Apphc"nt w1ll not uce "Report of J"e<lcr~l ful impact could be ol10r1VCd. I ist only largest unit

Action" box. 
or units affected, such as State, county, or city. If2a. Applicant's own control number, if desired, entire unit affected, list it rather than subunits. 
217. 	Dati! Section I Is prepared. 11. E&timated number ol persons directly benefitin;
from project.
3a, Number assigned by State clearinghouse, or If del.~ 

12. Usc. appropriate code letter. Definitions are:gated by State, by areawide clearinghouse. All re•
quests to Federal agencies must contain this identi· 
A. New. A submittal lor the first time for a newtier if the program is covered by Circular A-95 an\f project.required by applicable State/areawide clearins·house procedures. If in doubt, consult your clellr· El. Renewal. An extension for an additional funding/inghouse. budget period for ~ project having no projectedcompletion date, but for which Federal support3b. Date applicant notified of clearinghouse Identifier. must be renewed each year.
4a-4h. legal na·me of applicant/recipient, name of primary C. Revision. A modiiication to project nature ororganizational unit which will undertake the assist· 
scope which may re.sult in funding change (in..ance activity, complete address of applicant, and crease or decrease). ·name and telephone number of person who can pro~vide further information about this request. P. Continuation. An e~tension for an additional
funding/budget period for a project the aRency
s. 	Employer Identification number of applicant as as· initially agreod to fund for 11 definite number ofslsned by lntemill Revenue Service. years: 
Cia. 	Use Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance num• J:; Augmentation. A requirement for additionalber assigned to program under which assistance is: ·fuo1ds for a project previously awarded funds illrequested. If more than one program (e.g., joint• the same fundinp,/budget period. Project natljro 
•
,funding) write "multiple" and explain in remarks; and scope unchancc!l.
If unknown, cite Public Law or U.S. Code. 

13. Amount requested or to be contributed during thsProgram title from Federal Catalog. Abbreviate If first funding/bud£"! period by each contributor.necessary. V~luo of in-kind contributions will be included; Ifthe· action is a change in dollar amount of an exist•
7. 	Brief title and appropriate description of project, ing grant (a revision or augmentation), indicate
For notification of intent, continue In remarks sc·~· 
only the amount of the change. For decreases en•tion if necessary to convey proper description. • close the amount in parentheses. If both basic andsupplemental amounts are included, breakout in
8. 	Mostly self-explanatory. "City" includes town, town• remarks; For multiple program funding;" use totalsship or other municipality. 
and show program breakouts in remarks. Item deli·
9. Check the type(s) of assistance requested, The nitions: 13a, amount requested from Federal Gov·definitions of the terms are: ernmcrit; 13b, amount appli.:ant wi.ll contribute;13c, am"ount from State, if applicant is not a State;
A. Basic Grant. An original request for Federal ]3d, amount from local eovernment, if applicant is:
funds. This would not include any contribution not a lo~al government: 13e, amount from any other
provided under a supplemental grant. 
sources: explain in .remarks.
D. Supplemental Grant. A request to increase a 
14a, Self explanatory.
basic grant in certain cases where the eligibleapplicant cannot supply the required matching 14b. The dis~rict(s) where most of actual work will beshare of the basic Federal program (e.g., grant$accomplished. If city-wide or State-wide, covering
awarded by the Appalachian Regional Commis· several districts, write "city-wide" or "State-wide.''
slon to provide the applica·nt11 mat~hin& shilre); 	1lS. Complete only for revisions (Item 12c), or ausmen··C. Loan, Self explanatory, 
btions ,(item l2e). 
STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 3 (lo-75). 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
D -14 
Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 

• 

Item 
iG, 	Appl'IJk~ate date proSect eKpected'to beefn· (uiUally nsociatecf with a&tlmatecf date. of aveilablli,ty of fundl~~g), 
17. 	Estimated number. of 1n0nths to complete project ·aftet Federal funds are available. 
18, 	Estimated date preappllcatlon.(appllcation will be submitted to Federal agency II this project requires clearinghouse review. If review not required, this date would usuallt be same as date in item 2b. 

Item 
19. 

20. 



21. 


APPLiCAm:' PROCEDURES FOR 
Existing Federal Identification number ,; this II not a new request and directly relates to a previous Federal action. Otherwise write "NA", 
Indicate Federal agency to which this request I& addressed. Street address not required, but do use ZIP. 
Check appropriate box as to whether Section W of form contains remarks Blld/or additional remark& are attached, 


SECTION II 

AppRcants wnl always complete Items 23a, 23b, and 23c. If clearinghouse review Is required, Item 22b must be full)' cont• 
ploted. An explanation foll~s for each Item: 

'Item 
. 22b. 	List clearln£11lousos to which submitted and show In appropriate bloclls the status of their responses. For more than three clearinghouses,' continue 111 remMks section. All written comments submitted by or through clearinghouses must bo attached. 
Name a"t.l title of authorized representative of legal applicant. 
Item 
236. 	Self explanatoiY. 

•23c:. 	Self explanatory, 
Note: 	Applicant completes only Sections I and II. Section Ill is completed by Federal agencies, 

FEDERAL AGENCY PROCEDURES FOR SECTION Ill 
If appllcan~·supplled Information In Sections I and II needs no updating or adjustment to fit t'he final Federal action, the Federal agency will complote Section lll·only. An explanation for each item follows: 
Item 
24. 	
Execl•tive department or Independent agency having. 'program administra~ion responsibility, 

25. 	
Self explanatory. 

26. 	
Primary organizational unit below department level havin;: direct program management responsibility. 

27. 	
Office directly monitoring the program. 

28. 	
Use to Identify non·award actions where Federal grant Identifier in item 30 Is not applicable or will not suffice. · 

29. 	
Complete address of adrplnlstering office shown in item 26. 

30. 	
U~e to identify award actions where different from federal application identifier In item 28. 

31. 	
Self explanatory. Use remarks section to amplify Where appropriate. 


32, Amount to be contributed during the first funding/ budget period by each contributor. Value of ln·kind contributions will be· included. If the action Is a change in dollar amount of an existing grant (a revl· sion or augmentation), Indicate only 'the amount of change. For decreases, enclose the amount in pa· renthe:;es, If both basic and supplemental amounts are included, breakout in remarks. For multipfe pro· gram funding, use totals and show program break; outs in remarks. Item definitions: 32a, amount awarded by Federal Government; 32b, amount ap· plicant will contribute; 32c, amount from State, If applicant Is not a State; 32d, amount from local· government if applicant Is not a local government; 32e, amount from any other sources, explain In remarks, 
33. 	
Date action was taken on this request. 

34. 	
Date funds will become available, 


Item 
35. 	
Name end telephone no. of agency person who cart provide more information regardinf: this assistanca. 

36. 	
Date after which funds will no longer be available. 

37. 	
Check appropriate box as to whether Section IV of form contains Federal remarks and/or attachment of additional remarks. 

38. 	
For use with A-95 action notices only. Name and telephone of person who can assure that approprl· ate A-95 action has been taken-If same as person shown In Item 35, write "same". If not applicable, write "NA", 


Federal Agency Procedures-special considerations 
A•. Treasury Circular 1082 compliance. Federal agency will 
· 	essure proper completion of Sections I and Ill. If Section I Is being completed by Federal agency, all applicable items must be filled in. Addresses of State Information Recep· tlon Agencies (SCIRA's) are provided by Treasury Depart·' ment to each agency. This form replaces SF 240, which• will no longer be used, 
B. 	OMB Circular A-95 compliance. Federal agency will as.• 
sure proper completion of Sections I, II, and Ill. This form is required f()r notifying all reviewing clearinghouses of major actions on all programs reviewed under A-95. Addresses of State and areawide clearinghouses are pro. vided by OMB to each agency. Substantive differences between applicant's request and/or clearinghouse recom• mendations, and the project as finally awarded will be explained In A-95 notifications to clearinghouses. 
C, 	Special note. In most, but not all States. the A-95 State clearinghouse and the· (TC 1082) SCIRA are the same office. In such cases, the A-95 award notice to the State clearinghouse will fulfill the TC 1082 award notice re• 
qulrement to the State SCIRA, Duplicate notification should be avoided. 
STANDARD FORM 424 PAGE 4 (1o-75) 

[FR Doc.76-9Z6 Ptled 1-12-76;8:46 am] 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 8-TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976 
D 	-15 




• 

• 

• 

Pam 210-4 
AppendixE 
OMB CIRCULAR A-95: WHAT IT IS-HOW IT WORKS 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page
E-4
STRUCTURE OF THE CIRCULAR 
E-5
STATUTORY BASE 
E-6
THE APPROACH 
E-6
1. 	Philosophy 
E-7
2. 	Basic Premises 
E-7
3. 	Basic Objectives 
E-8
THE 1976 AMENDMENTS TO OMB CIRCULAR A-95 
E-9
1. 	Program Coverage 
E-10
2. 	Clarifications 
E-10
3. 	Improved Implementation 
E-ll
PART 1: PROJECT NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW SYSTEM 
E-ll
1. 	The Process in Brief 
E-13
2. 	Clearinghouses 
E-13
a. 	Organization and Designation Criteria 
E-16
b. 	The Notification of Intent (NOI) 
-Summary information requirements 
-NOI format and SF 424 
-NOI variations 

E-19
3. 	Clearinghouse Functions 
E-19
a. 	General Role E-19
b. 	Obligatory Referrals 
E-20
c. 	Involvement of Nongovernmental Entities 
!' 
E-1 
Pam 210-4 
Page 
d. 	Preference for General Purpose Units of Local Government E-21 
e. Coordination Among Adjacent Clearinghouses 	E-21 
4. 	Consultation and Review E-21 
a. 	Timing E-21 
b. 	Inclusion of Other Comments E-22 
c. 	Privileged Information E-23 
d. 	Renewals and Continuation Grants E-24 
5. Subject Matter of Comments and Recommendations 	E-25 
6. 	Federal Agency Procedures E-26 
7. 	Housing Programs E-27 
a. 	Review Process E-27 
b. 	Size of Projects Subject to Review E-28 
c. 	Exemption E-28 
d. 	Content of Housing Reviews E-29 
8. Coverage, Exemptions, and Variations 	E-30 
a. 	Exceptions and Variations 
E-30 
b. 	Coverage -Interprogram relationships -Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance -Relationship of A-95 to TC 1082 and FMC 74-7 E-30 
9. Joint Funding 	E-32 
10. Additional Questions on Part I E-32 
a. Financial Support for A-95 Review 	E-32 
b. Relationship of A-95 and Environmental Impact Statements 	E-33 
c. The Federal Interest in A-95 	E-34 
"'· 
• 
Pam 210-4 
Page \ 
E-35
• PART TI: DffiECT FEDERAL DEVELOPMENT 
E-35
1. Scope of Requirement 
E-36
2. Implementation E-36
3. Federal Licenses and Permits 
E-37
4. Medical Facilities Requirements 
E-37
PARTID: STATEPLANS E-38
PART IV: COORDINATION OF PLANNING IN MULTI..JURISDICTIONAL AREAS E-41
SUMMARY E-43ExmBITS 
E-3 
Pamm 210-4 
OMB CIRCULAR NO. A-95 
WHAT IT IS --HOW IT WORKS 
Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-95 is a regulation
designed to promote maximum coordination of Federal and federally
assisted programs and projects with each other and with State,
areawide, and local plans and programs. 
STRUCTURE OF THE CIRCULAR 
OMB Circular No. A-95 comprises two components: the Circular 
itself, which is very brief, and five attachments. The Circular 
identifies the statutory authorities on which it is based, its primary objectives, and general provisions that apply to its . 
several operative Parts. 
Attachment A contains the operative requirements of the Circular 
and definitions of key terms used therein. Most of the defini
tions are statutory. 
Attachment B contains the laws on which the Circular is based: Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Develop
•ment Act of 1966 and Title IV of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968. 
Attachment C contains the language of Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The clearinghousereview· system established under Part I of Attachment A is used 
in partial fulfillment of the Act. (NOTE: A-95 is often cited as being based, in part, on the National Environmental PolicyAct. It is not, nor is it an extension of NEPA, but is a means to secure State and local inputs to Environmental Impact Statements as required by Section 102(2) (C) of the Act.) 
Attachment D id~ntifies the Federal domestic assistance programscovered by the Project Notification and Review System. 
Attachment E is Standard Form 424 which is used to inform clear
inghouses of actions taken on projects they have reviewed. SF 424 may also be used, at the election of any clearinghouse, as the Notification of Intent. 
E -4 

Pam 210-4 
The Circular has four major parts under Attachment A: 
Part I, the "Project Notification and Review System" (PNRS), 
deals with State and local review of applications for Federal assistance. 
Part II, "Direct Federal Development," provides for consulta
tion by Federal agencies with State and local government on 
direct Federal development projects. 

Part III, "State Plans," provides for gubernatorial review of State plans required under certain Federal formula grant programs. 
Part IV, "Coordination of Planning in MultijurisdictionalAreas," promotes coordination of federally assisted planning at the substate regional level. 
STATUTORY BASE 
Circular No. A-95 was first issued July 24, 1969, in partial 
implementation of Title IV of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968. A-95 also rescinded and incorporated the provisions of an earlier OMB directive, Circular No. A-82, which was issued 
to implement Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966. 
Major revisions to the Circular were promulgated on February 9, 1971, November 13, 1973, and January 2, 1976 (published in the Federal Re~ister, January 13, 1976). The revisions were occasioned 
by the nee for clarification of some of the requirements and by demands for strengthening various of its provisions and for 
broadening the scope of. the Federal programs and activities covered under its provisions. 
The "Project Notific~tion and Review System" is based in large 
measure on Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966. Section 204 requires that applica
tions for Federal assistance to a wide variety of public facility 
type projects (highways, hospitals, etc.) in metropolitan areas 
must be accompanied by the comments of an areawide comprehensive 
planning agency as to the relationship of the proposed project 
to the planned development of the area. 

However, Title IV of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act is 
the broad policy base on which A-95 rests. It is fundamentally 
a statement of national policy which asserts the cooperative,

• E -5 
Pam 210-4 
intergovernmental nature of Federalism and directs the close 
coordination of Federal and federally assisted plans and programs
for the development of the nation's physical, natural, economic,
and human resources with State, areawide, and local plans and 
programs. 
Title IV directs the President to "establish rules and regulations
governing the formulation, evaluatipn, and review of Federal pro
grams and projects having a significant impact on area and com
munity development." The basic objectives of this mandate center 
about the importance of sound and orderly development of urban
and rural areas for the economic and social development of thenation. Section 40l(b) of the Act requires that "all viewpoints
national, State, regional, and local --shall, to the extentpossible, be taken into account in planning Federal federally
or 
assisted development programs and projects.'' Section 40l(c)states, moreover, that "to the maximum extent possible, consistent 
with national objectives, all Federal aid for development purposes shall be consistent with and further the objectives ofState, regional and local .comprehensive planning." 
The following paragraphs are aimed at further elaborating theregulations promulgated by Circular No. A-95. 
THE APPROACH 
1. Philosophy 
The "philosophy" that lies behind A-95 is based on the followingviews. 
The statutes themselves represent a response to the need for coordination of planning and development activities within and amongFederal, State, and local levels of government, at each of whichthere may be structural obstacles of such coordination. 
At the Federal level, there is a myriad of programs of
assistance to State and local government that were 
developed piecemeal and, taken as a whole, are not 
coherent as to policy and administration. They are 
often duplicative and sometimes even in conflict with 
each other; 
At the State level, Governors' abilities to manage are 
not only often circumscribed by State Constitutions but 
administratively frustrated, with respect to Federal 
programs, by functional bureaucracies; 
• 

E -6 
p~210-4 
• 

Local government is heavily fragmented both within and among jurisdictions; and 
Within individual jurisdictions many federally assisted programs and projects cannot be planned without reference to programs and projects within other functional or jurisdictional areas. 
~-95 is an instrument for facilitatin the needed coordination w1t out encroac 1ng on t e constitutional domain o-t e States or the statutory responsibilities of Federal program administrators. 
2. Basic PrcmJ.scs 
A-95 is based on the following premises: 
Fundamental to coordination is communication; therefore, 
If people who should be talking to each other are put in a position of naving to talk to each other, then 
• 
They may come to identify and understand their communities of interest and areas of conflict; and, if they do, then 
They may cooperate in pursuit of their common interests and try to negotiate their differences; 
To the extent that they do, federally assisted programs and projects are more likely to be better coordinated, resulting in dollar savings, better projects and more value for public investment. 
In short, A-95 cannot assure coordination, but it is designed to create a climate for inter overnmental coo eration in which coordination 1s more 11 ely 
3. Basic Objectives 
It is the aim of OMB to be very clear about the objectives of A195, but to refrain, to the greatest practicable degree, from being prescriptive about the means by which those objectives are to be achieved. The requirements of A-95 apply almost entirely to Federal agencies (and under their rules to applicants for Federal assistance). That is, A-95 sets forth procedures under which Federal agencies and applicants for Federal assistance must give State and local governments, through State and areawide clearinghouses, an opportunity to assess the relationship of their 
E -7 

Pamm 210-4 
proposals to State, areawide, and local plans and programs.
Federal agencies are to consider these assessments in the light
of the mandates of Title IV in deciding whether or not to proceed
with the proposed project. 
However, recognizing the wide diversity among States, regions, and localities in the manner in which the public business is conducted, A-95 puts few constraints on clearinghouses in the way they manage
the review process. They are limited as to the time allowed for reviews, and they are obligated to identify jurisdictions and agencies whose plans or programs might be affected by a proposedproject and give them a chance to participate in the review process.However, A-95 does-TIOt prescribe: 
The existence of clearinghouses as such; 
The organization of clearinghouses; 
The procedures or techniques by which clearinghouses 
manage the review process; or 

Whether or not clearinghouses even carry out reviews 
for particular projects or types of projects under 
programs covered by the Circular. 

• 
In short, A-95 is designed to provide an opportunity for Governors, mayors, county elected officials, and other State and local officials, through clearinghouses, to influence Federal decisions on proposed projects that may affect their own plans and programs. 
THE 1976 AMENDMENTS TO OMB CIRCULAR NO. A-95 
During 1974, the General Accounting Office undertook a review of Parts I and II of the Circular to ascertain how it was workingand how it might be improved. While the GAO report proceeded from the assumption that A-95 is a valuable and productive instrument for improving the management of Federal domestic programs, it concluded that achievement of its full potential depended upon: 
E -8 
Pam 210-4 
-(: ·-
Broadening of program coverage under Part I; 
Clarification of various elements of requirements under Part I; 
Greater guidance to Federal agencies under Part II; 
More rigorous implementation on the part of OMB and the 
Federal agencies. 
Most of the changes in the 1976 revision were made in Parts I and Il, and in substantial measure they reflect GAO recommendations. 
l. Program Coverage 
Originally, GAO had recommended that Part I cover all Federal domestic assistance programs, but OMB pointed out that many appeared 
tp fall outside the scope and objectives of the laws on which A-95 is based: direct assistance to individuals, scientific end technological research, etc. Therefore, GAO modified its recommendation to suggest coverage of all programs having an impact on area or community development. The 1976 revision expands coverage to 
comprise virtually all programs having an identifiable impact on 
area or community development. 
However, because of apparent widespread confusion over criteria 
for including or excluding programs under Part I, a new paragraph 8 
was added to Part I in an attempt to mitigate this confusion. Paragraph B.a. sets forth the primary concerns and objectives of A-95 and the laws on which it is based. These center on federally assisted development having an impact on State, areawide, and local development. A-95 is concerned with achieving the most effective and efficient utilization of Federal assistance resources through coordination and the elimination of conflict and duplication. 
Paragraph 8.b. sets forth eight types of programs that are not con
sidered appropriate for coverage under A-95. They are considered 
inappropriate, because project impacts on State, areawide, or 
local development are only discernible in the aggregate (e.g., 
grants or loans to individuals for personal or family betterment), 
indirectly (e.g., technological research leading to the discovery 
of a new chemical compound to drive automobile engines), or after 
the fact (e.g., grants to a school district to improve student 
reading capability). In sum, they are the types of programs where 
the evaluative capability of clearinghouses and their associated 
agencies could not, generally, be effectively used. 
Paragraph S.c. sets forth criteria upon which exceptions from 
review requirements might be made for certain categories of pro
jects under programs that are covered. They are, for the most 
part, based on the excluded program types identified in paragraph 
B. b. 
E -9 
Paragraph S.d. provides for procedural variations that are needed in certain situations where it would be difficult to follow the normal requirements, particularly the time allowed for review. This most frequently arises in the case of a new program where statutory mandates set deadlines for start-up. The administering agency will require time to develop procedures for applicants to follow, as well as for internal agency program management. Thus, little time remains for the normal A-95 review (see Exhibits 1 and 2). The variation granted in such cases is either a shortening of the review time or simultaneous submission of the application to the funding agency and to:the clearinghouses. Clearinghouse comments are then sent directly to the funding agency. 
In the past, some agencies have requested procedural variations when Congress has delayed appropriations for a program. This is not normally considered a valid reason for a variation. Applicantswill, generally, have been preparing applications so that they will be ready for submittal to the Federal agency when funds are made available. Thus, there is no reason that the prospective-ipplicants cannot be consulting clearinghouses during this waiting period. 
2. Clarifications 
In the 1976 revision, OMB has attempted to elaborate on such of the procedures --particularly the timing of reviews under Part 
•
I --about which there has been some confusion. A number of thingsthat were more or less implicit in the previous Circular were made explicit. For instance, it had always been the obligation of a clearinghouse to give a mayor opportunity to make an independent review of all proposed projects in his jurisdiction, should he so request. A new provision of paragraph 3.b. makes this clear. 
Further clarifications are achieved by incorporating this handbook, "A-95: What It Is --How It Works," by reference in the main bodyof the Circular (paragraph 4). Similarly, "A-95 Administrative Notes" are incorporated in paragraph 5. The administrative notes are a device for advising clearinghouses and others of OMB interpretations or answers to new questions that have arisen about the Circular or of temporary exceptions or procedural variations that have been granted. 
3. Improved Implementation 
During 1974, OMB took a most significant action to improve the administration of A-95 requirements by delegating responsibility for day-to-day operational oversight of the Circular to the 
Federal Regional Councils. OMB retained responsibility for policyoversight and development. 
•
E-10 

Pam 210-4 
• 

The delegation provided that the FRCs would provide implementation oversight at least at the level that had been provided by OMB. 
This involved, in very substantial measure, responding to formal complaints and inquiries for information on the Circular. However, OMB encouraged the FRCs, insofar as their own priorities 
and resources permitted, to go beyond this. Training of Federal 
field personnel in A-95 requirements, development of informational 
materials, establishment of liaison arrangements with clearinghouses, studies of A-95 implementation among the agencies and at 
the clearinghouse level were encouraged. Moreover, although OMB retained policy control, it was made very clear to the FRCs that OMB expected them to be a primary source of policy input, both 
in terms of recommendations for policy initiatives and as consultants to OMB on policy development. 
The FRCs have all gone beyond the basic charge to he responsive to complaints and inquiries. Most have undertaken studies of 
individual agency compliance and clearinghouse operations, have conducted training seminars or similar efforts to increase Federal 
field personnel understanding of the requirements, and have established liaison with State and areawide clearinghouses. 
Feedback from clearinghouses in most parts of the country indi
c~tes a higher level of Federal responsiveness to A-95 requirements. 
Another action designed to improve implementation of the A-95 requirements is the amendment to the Circular requiring that all 
Federal agencies having programs affected by the requirements publish their implementing regulations and procedures in the 
Federal Register. Publication is intended to secure a greater 
cons 1s tency among such regulations and to. increase awareness and understanding of the requirements by Federal personnel adminis
tering the programs affected by A-95, by potential applicants, 
apd by the clearinghouses. 
Other amendments to the Circular will be touched on at appropriate places in the following discussion of the various requirements under the several Parts of Attachment A. 
PART I: PROJECT NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW SYSTEM 
1. The Process in Brief 
The Project Notification and Review System (PNRS) may be thought 
of as an "early warning system" to facilitate coordination of federally assisted projects with State, regional, area and local 
E • ll 
Pam 210-4 
•

plans and programs. Coordination is sought through review by 
State and local governments of applications for Federal assis
tance. The medium through which State and local governments and 
agencies are provided with opportunity to make such reviews are 
State and areawide "clearinghouses" which are generally compre
hensive planning agencies. 

The PNRS is referred to as an "early warning system" as it is a two-step process, the first of which signals clearinghouses that an application is in )reparation. When an applicant-to-be decides to seek Federal assistance for a project, he sends a "notification of intent" (NOI) to the State and the areawide clearinghouses, which provides them with a summary description of the proposed project. More detailed NOI procedures are often prescribed by the clearinghouses within limits set by the Circular. 
The idea at this stage is to identify potential issues or problems so that the applicant will be saved the trouble and expense of completing an application for a project having serious problems. Their early disclosure may permit changes which will win clearinghouse endorsement of the completed application. 
The clearinghouse, then, will examine the NOI to determine if there are actual or potential problems with the project in relation to State or .areawide plans or programs. It will also try to identify any individual agencies or jurisdictions having plans or programs that might be affected by the proposed project. The clearinghouse will assure that they receive a copy of the NO! or otherwise have an opportunity to evaluate the proposal. 
·Within 30 days of receiving the NOI, the clearinghouse must indicate to the applicant whether or not there are any issues raised by the proposal. If there are, arrangements are made for negotiating their resolution. If there are none, the clearinghouse may "sign off." If that is the case (with respect to both State and areawide clearinghouses), the applicant has fulfilled his obligations and is free to submit his application to the funding agency at such time as he has completed it. If a clearinghouse requests it, an information copy is sent to the clearinghouse. 
Where an applicant has received no word, acknowledgment, or 
response to an NOI from a clearinghouse within 30. days, it may 
assume that the clearinghouse will have no comments and may pro
ceed accordingly. Therefore, clearinghouses are advised to 
acknowledge the NOI and indicate potential interest. 

• 

E -12 

Pam 210-4, 
The second stage of the review process involves a review of the completed application, if issues and problems identified by the 
clearinghouse have not been resolved. Clearinghouses may have 30 days to review the completed application and supply any comments they may have to the applicant. All comments submitted by clearinghouses become part of the application and must accompany it when it is sent to the funding agency. The funding 
agency will utilize such comments in evaluating the application. 
In many cases, preparation of an application is very simple and can be accomplished in little time. In such cases, preparation of an NO! may be superfluous, and it will be simpler to submit 
the completed application to the clearinghouses. In such cases, or in any case where no NO! has been submitted, clearinghouses may have 60 days to review the application. However, in most cases, particularly where physical development projects are 
involved, application preparation may take several months or 
more (and will generally involve substantial expense). In such cases, submission of an NO! will serve to expose any problems which can be resolved during the application preparation process, 
so that when it is completed, its submission need not be delayed 
an extra 30 days. Even where issues have not been resolved, 
delay is minimized, because the position of the clearinghouse is 
established, and comments can be prepared and transmitted to the 
applicant expeditiously. 
The whole idea of the two-stage review process is to avoid red 
tape and delay. It should be viewed hy clearinghouses (and hy 
applicants) as a service to clientele governments and other 
applicants to enable them to develop the best possible project 
to meet their needs without doing damage to the plans and programs of others. Many clearinghouses have developed quick screening procedures so they can use their review resources on projects 
most likely to have major community or intergovernmental impact. Most reviews are concluded during the ·early warning stage. 
It should be noted that clearinghouses themselves are usually 
also applicants for assistance under various programs and are, 
therefore, subject to the requirements of Part I. In the case 
of State clearinghouses, other State agencies as well as areawide clearinghouses may have comments on the proposed project or 
activities for which assistance is heing sought. Similarly, in 
the case of areawide clearinghouse applicants, individual local jurisdictions or the State clearinghouse may wish to comment. 
2. Clearinghouses 
E -13 


Pam 210-4 
always, State comprehensive planning agencies. In some cases,
they are State budget or administrative offices. Areawide clear
inghouses are almost always comprehensive planning agencies,
covering one or more counties. Most of them are organizations
of units of general local governments comprised in the area,
that is "Councils of Governments" (COGs). 
The Office of Management and Budget normally designates areawide 
clearinghouses covering metropolitan areas, based on its 
authority under Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and 
Metropolitan Development Act of 1966. However, it is OMB policy
to seek the concurrence of the Governor before making or chang
ing such a designation. This is because Part IV of A-95 encour
ages Governors to develop Statewide systems of planning districts 
and requires Federal agencies assisting multijurisdictionalplanning to conform to them, unless there is clear justification
not to. 
This has led to some anomalies. Within States, some Governors 
have designated planning districts larger than, but encompassingmetropolitan clearinghouse jurisdictions. The Governors then 
sometimes designate the larger district planning organization, pursuant to their authority under A-95, as a clearinghouse, while 
requesting that the metropolitan clearinghouse retain its own 
designation. Thus, applicants in the metropolitan counties must 
submit their applications to two areawide clearinghouses (as well as to the State clearinghouse), unless the two areawide clearinghouses have worked out arrangements for a single point of entryinto the review system. In many cases, however, the metropolitan
clearinghouse has merged with the larger area organization or simply has expanded its jurisdiction. 
A rather worse anomaly exists in the case of interstate metropolitan areas. Here, in many instances, a metropolitan area clearing
house designated by OMB may straddle State borders and have its 
parts on either side encompassed in larger substate districts designated by the Governors of each State. This tends to fragmentareawide planning for a variety of functions which should be planned on the basis of a whole urbanized area. This has been 
particularly prevalent in the fields of law enforcement and health planning. 
However, OMB has taken a strong policy position respecting the designation of clearinghouses in interstate metropolitan areas. It has been the OMB position that, at a minimum, the jurisdiction
of such clearinghouses should include the whole of the urbanized 
portion of a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA).Further, within States, where urbanized areas cross SMSA lines, 
•
E -14 

Pam 210-4 
• 

OMB has taken the pos1t1on that the clearinghouse jurisdictions 
also should comprise the whole of the contiguous urbanized area. This is the reason that many clearinghouse jurisdictions will 
extend into or comprise two or more SMSAs. In administering the "701" comprehensive planning program, HUD also has held to this policy. 
There is no doubt that overlapping planning areas, particularly in interstate areas, work a hardship on the local jurisdictions in such areas. Not only are they subject to more complications in the A-95 review process, but often they must contribute to the support of multiple planning organizations, many of them engaging in the same type of activities. Part IV of A-95 is designed to mitigate the adverse effects of these anomalies, but the diversity of Federal planning requirements, statutory and administrative, (particularly as they apply to jurisdiction and representation) and a residuum of State and local parochialism in many places militate against well coordinated planning at the areawide level. 
Nevertheless, in spite of these impediments, the movement to 
establish substate clearinghouses and State systems of planning 
areas has moved steadily forward since the issuance of the Circular in 1969. Over forty States have established substate district systems, although not all are truly viable. At the same 
time, there are nearly 540 areawide clearinghouses with 28 States completely blanketed. 
OMB has established no formal criteria for the designation of clearinghouses in metropolitan areas. However, Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act indicates, in view of their functions, that areawide review agencies ("clearinghouse" is an OMB term, .coinec for A-95 purposes) will be comprehensive planning agencies, composed to the greatest practicable extent of elected officials of the units of general local government comprised in the area. The Act also describes them as areawide, which OMB has taken to mean that they must cover, as noted above, the whole of the urbanized area i~ an SMSA or extending into more than one SMSA. 
OMB does not set a membership criterion. That is, it does not insist that any number of jurisdictions must belong to the clearinghouse nor that the membership comprise any minimum percentage of the population of the area. In metropolitan areas where there is no comprehensive planning agency, OMB will ask the Governor to designate the State clearinghouse on an interim basis to assure that the A-95 process is carried out until the local governments of the area organize their own comprehensive planning agency which OMB can then designate. 
E -15 
p~210-4 
•From time to time, one or more local jurisdictions will withdraw from a clearinghouse and request OMB to designate them as a clearinghouse or withdraw designation from the existing clearinghouse organization. The first alternative has always been found unacceptable to OMB for one or more of several reasons: 
The withdrawing jurisdiction(s) did not comprise the 
whole of the urbanized area; 
It (or they) was not organized to carry out comprehen
sive planning; 
In the case of county withdrawals, the municipalities 
were not in accord. 
In the case of the latter alternative, de-designation of the existing clearinghouse, it has been OMB's position that one or more of the larger jurisdictions should not be able to hold clear
inghouse status hostage to their own individual satisfaction. Of 
course, if most of the members of a clearinghouse organization were to defect, it would no longer be viable as a comprehensive, 
areawide planning body and might, indeed, become defunct. In 
such case, OMB would ask the Governor's assistance, as though 
there were no designatable clearinghouse. 
•All non-metropolitan clearinghouse jurisdictions, of course, are designated by the Governor. Such designation will depend on criteria he has established. In most cases, a primary criterion is comprehensive planning capability or demonstrable effort to establish such capability. 
b. The Notific~tion of Intent (NO!~. Timing is of the 
essence for the NO!. It is the heart o the "early warning" 
feature of PNRS that can set the stage for issue identification, 
negotiation, and resolution. Properly followed, it will serve to 
prevent delay in submitting the application once it is prepared. 
Therefore, it is critical that the NO! be sent to the clearing
houses at the very earliest time after the applicant has made the 
decision to seek Federal assistance and can provide summary 
.descriptive information about the project that will permit the 
clearinghouse to inaugurate the review process. 
It may well be that the full level of project detail necessary 
for clearinghouses to comtlete an evaluation may not be available 
at the time the NO! is su mitted. However, to the extent that 
the clearinghouses need more information, it should be supplied 
as the application is developed. In this connection, however, a 
cautionary word is in order. The applicant is not required to 
E -16 
Pam 210-4 
• 

provide more information than is requested of him in his application by the funding agency. Of course, if such additional information is readily at hand, the applicant is urged to supRlY it to the clearinghouse desiring it. However, it would be unreasonable to expect the applicant to spend resources in dev-eloping information that is not required of him by the agency from which he is seeking assistance. 
The Federal Government prescribes no specific format for the NOI. However, many clearinghouses have developed their own NOT forms, and the applicnnt is well advised to ascertain whether the cleari nghouscs to which he must provide an NOI have (level oped such forms. ln late 1975, the Federal Government issued a standard app 1 i cat ion face sheet, Standard Form 4 24, that must :1ccompany applications for grants-in-aid from State and local government. 
SF 424 supplies ·summary information about the project, assurances that the appropriate clearinghouses have been given a chance to comment, and information from the Federal agency about action taken on the application. These several parts of the form are filled out successively by the applicant and the Federal agency. Copies are then sent to clearinghouses by funding agencies, when they have taken action on the application and completed the form. SF 424 may also be used, at the option of clearinghouses, as the NOI. There is indication that many will exercise that option. Its use as an NOI may facilitate attempts by clearinghouses to track action on an application from the time they receive the NOI through final action on the application. 
Several variations on the NOI are identified in paragraph 2 of Part I: 
NOis for projects which may have Statewide impact, but for which specific local effects are not clear, need be sent only to the State clearinghouse. An example might be an application from an academic institution to develop criteria for selecting historic landmarks within the State. If the State clearinghouse identifies the need .to involve areawide clearinghouses in the review, it may do so. 
NOis for projects affecting land and water use and development or construction in the National Capital Region (the District of Columbia, Prince Georges and Montgomery Counties, Maryland; and Arlington, Fairfax, Prince William, and Loudon Counties and the City of Alexandria, Virginia) must send their NOis not only to the appropriate State and areawide clearinghouses, but to the National Capital Planning 
E -17 
Pam 210-4 
Commission (NCPC). NCPC is the Federal agency responsi
ble for developing plans for the Federal establishment in the region. State and local development plans in the region can have substantial impact on the functioning of the Federal Government in the area. Of course, Federal agencies undertaking development in the National Capital Region are required to consult with clearinghouses on their proposed projects, pursuant to Part II. 
Federally recognized Indian tribes are not required to send NOis or applications to clearinghouses for review. This is because of certain treaty rights which give the 
tribes a unique status vis-a-vis the Federal Government in most of their dealings with it, not requiring them to "go through" State and local governments. However, Federal agencies are required to inform State and areawide clearinghouses of any applications received from tribes. Thus, if any problems of adverse impact are discerned, the clearinghouse can take it up with the tribe or register its concern with the Federal agency. 
Tribes are urged tQ participate in the review process voluntarily as there are substantial ben~fits to be derived therefrom. These might include technical assistance in planning better or more economical tribal projects. Participation would also involve receiving timely information about non-tribal projects that might affect tribal interests or holdings. 
Some of the tribes have extensive holdings and a variety of organizations or entities which might qualify for Federal assistance. Consequently, such a tribe may have internal problems of coordination. In some cases, a tribe may establish a formal coordinating mechanism; and on request to the Office of Manage
ment and Budget, may have that mechanism treated as though it were a clearinghouse. That is, applications from tribal entities 
coor
or organizations would have to be submitted to the tribal dinating mechanism for review and comment. 
Where a tribal unit has incorporated under the laws of a State to carry out some function (e.g., housing development), applications for Federal assistance from such corporation are subject to the requirements of A-95. Similarly, applications from tribes for development of non-reservation lands are subject to those requirements. .The reasoning is that by incorporating under State law or by operating off of tribal lands, a tribe is subject to State and/or local law governing those activities, and therefore also subject to A-95 requirements. 
• 

E -18 
Pam 210-4 
3. Clearinghouse Functions 
a. General Role. The term, "clearinghouse," was chosen deliberately to reflect in full the functions of the A-95 review agencies. 
Of course, the primary function of the clearinghouse is to examine the proposed project for its Statewide or areawide impacts and its relationship to State or areawide comprehensive pl~ns or policies. 
The clearinghouse function comes into play as the review agencies provide an opportunity for State agencies or individual local jurisdictions or agencies to examine the proposed project against 
the finer grain of their own plans and programs. That is, the 
clearinghouses will send copies of NOis to State agencies or to individual local jurisdictions and agencies which might be 
affected so that they might make individual assessments of the project. In this connection, as noted earlier, the Circular provides that local chief executives may request areawide clearinghouses to send copies of all NOis for projects that may be proposed within their jurisdictions so that they may coordinate internal reviews by municipal or county agencies. 
State clearinghouses tend to serve primarily as clearinghouses rather than to perform their own reviews. This may be because some are not planning agencies at all, and in various States, the art and practice of State comprehensive planning may not be well developed. Areawide clearinghouses, on the other hand, give a 
much more pronounced emphasis to performing their own substantive reviews, as well as serving as clearinghottses to solicit the views or others. There are, of course, except ions to this genera t observation. 
b. Obli!atory Referrals. Clearinghouses have three obliga
tory referra s (in addit1on to local chief executives who request 
them). These are: 

To State and local environmental agencies for projects which may require an environmental impact statement (EIS). This is primarily so that such agencies may 
point out to the applicant potential environmental considerations that will ·have to be dealt with iri the development of the ~IS. They may also provide subs~antive information that will be useful in EIS development. Of course, these environmental agencies may also play a useful role in reviewing the adequacy of the EIS after it is drafted. 
E-19 
Pam 210-4 
To State and local civil rights agencies. Such agencies 
include not only those charged with enforcement of State 
and local civil rights laws, but advisory agencies such 
as human relations commissions which have an interest in 
the promotion of civil rights and anti-discrimination. 
Coastal zone manag~ment agencies. These are State desig
nated agencies which develop coastal zone management plans 
under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Under the 
Act, when such plans are approved by the Secretary of 
Commerce, they provide a regulatory constraint on Federal 
or federally assisted activities affecting the coastal zone. 
' 
i i 
I c. Involvement of Nongovernmental Entities. While the PNRS 
1 
requires that clearinghouses involve only State and local govern
mental agencies in the review process, OMB encourages them to 
~nvite the participation of nongovernmental organizations as well. 

/The limitation on obligatory involvement of nongovernmental 
~entities is due to the intergovernmental objectives of Title IV 
of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act. Also, from a practical 
standpoint, clearinghouses cannot be expected to be aware of all 
the myriad citizen groups in an area or a State which might have 
an interest in the project. 

At the same time, private sector involvement in the review process 
•
can be very beneficial. Relationships established with State and 
local agencies as well as with citizen groups and other interest 
groups through conscientious application of the "clearinghouse" 
aspect of the PNRS can enhance the status of the clearinghouse as 
a focal point for planning coordination and can lend popular and 
private sector support to clearinghouse activities. In addition, 
the expertise that can be provided by these agencies and organiza
tions represents a useful supplement to the clearinghouses' own 
review resources and capabilities. 

A special note should be made here of what are often termed 
"paragovernmental organizations." These are generally not-for
profit organizations which carry out governmental functions. 
Examples are Community Action Agencies, Councils of Government, 
Economic Dev€lopment District organizations, etc. In many cases, 
of course, these agencies are governmental units established under 
State law. In either event, it is OMB policy to consider them as 
governmental units, even when they are paragovernmental. There
fore, clearinghouses (some of which are themselves paragovernmental 
organizations) should refer NOis to them for comment, where appro
priate. 

•

E -20 

Pam 210-4 
• 

• 

d. Preference for General Pureose Units of Local Government. Both section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act and Title IV of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act state a strong preference for the award of Federal assistance to units of general purpose government over special purpose units when both are competing for assistance to perform tfie same function. This preference is based on the perception that special purpose units are usually governed by citizens appointed by the State or by local government, who once appoi~ted are often not directly accountable either to those who appointed them or to the electorate for their performance in office. Also, special purpose units contribute heavily to the fragmentation of local government and serve to complicate local fiscal structures. While many special purpose units are well adapted to carry out their functions and, indeed, carry them out quite effectively, they do constitute another layer of government that is not always amenable to electoral control. 
This statutory preference for general purpose units accounts for the provision that clearinghouses assure that such units have an opportunity to comment on any application for assistance by a special purpose unit in their jurisdiction. 
e. Coordination Amon~ Adjacent Clearinghouses. There are nearly 540 areawide clearinghouses, covering over three-quarters of the land area of the "South 48." They include well over 90 percent of the total population. Twenty-eight States are completely blanketed by areawide clearinghouses. While the areawides may serve to diminish the spillover impacts among local government activities in their jurisdictions, there will still be spillover effects from one clearinghouse jurisdiction to another. Therefore, it is important that arrangements be developed between contiguous clearinghouses for coordinating reviews of projects the impact of which may extend beyond clearinghouse boundaries. 
Such coordination agreements are even more critical in those 
instances, described earlier, where clearinghouse jurisdictions overlap, particularly in interstate metropolitan areas. 
4. Consultation and Review 
a. Timing. Paragraph 4 of Part I sets forth the timing of the review process as described earlier in this booklet and in Exhibits 1 and 2. Many people find the two-stage review concept difficult to grasp. One way to look at it is as a 60-day process, composed of two 30-day periods which may be separated in time. Whether or not the two 30-day periods are separated depends on how long it takes to complete the application. Obviously, if it takes 90 days 
E-21 
Pam 210-4 
to complete an application, and an NOI has been filed at the 
•
beginning of application preparation, and the clearinghouse requires a full 30 days to review the completed application, then the full process would take 120 days: 
Thirty-day NOI period, during which the clearinghouse may identify any issues and bring them to the attention of the applicant. During this period the applicant may 
have commenced the development of his application; 
Sixty additional days the applicant need to complete his application (during which he is trying to negotiate out any identified issues); and 
Thirty days after the clearinghouse receives the completed application, analyzes it, and prepares comments for submission to the applicant. 
On the other hand, as noted above, if the applicant requires only a day or two to complete an application after he has decided to apply, an NOI is superfluous. He can submit the completed application to the clearinghouse which will then have 60 days to complete its review. 
Of particular additional note in paragraph 4 of Part I are the following provisions. 
• 
b. Inclusion of Other Comments. In addition to their own comments, areawide clearinghouses are required to transmit to applicants any written comments submitted to them by individual 
jurisdictions, agencies, or nongovernmental organizations, which 

are at variance with the comments of the clearinghouse. "At 
variance" is meant to include views that are opposed to the 
official clearinghouse views, in whole or iti part; or views that, 
while not necessarily opposed to clearinghouse views, are different, 

proceeding from other perspectives or based on other information. 

The reason for including variant views is twofold: 

To assure that the funding agency gets the full range of local views on any project; and 
To encourage serious participation of local jurisdictions and organizations in the review process by assuring them 
that their views will receive the consideration of the funding agency in its evaluation of. the proposal. 
•

E -22 

P8!D 210-4 

This requirement does not apply to State clearinghouses. This is because the State clearinghouse is considered to be the spokesman for the Governor. Thus, the views of individual State agencies may be included or excluded, depending upon whether or not they are in accord with the policies and programs of the Governor. To the extent that the State clearinghouse does not articulate any Views of its own but simply forwards the views of individual State agencies --which may be variable --they are considered to be simply that: the views of those individual agencies, which may or may not represent gubernatorial policy. 
This js not to say that th9y will not receive full consideration by the Federal agency. However, the agency is not required to exp1:tJn its action, if it funds a project over the objections of an inJiviJual State agency as it would if the clearinghouse, speaking for the Governor, voiced opposition to the project.Simi.larly, at the areawide level, the funding agency is not required to explain its action in approving a project to which an individual jurisdiction objected, although the clearinghouse had endorsed the project. Of course, a prudent program administrator might find it most proper, consonant with good management and intergovernmental relations principles, to explain his action to a local chief executive or to any commentator who provided him with a well-documented objection. 
c. Privileged Information. Under certain programs, particularly those providing assistance to quasi-public or private organizations or individuals, the applicant is required to provide the funding agency with information about the financial status of the organization or about specific individuals who will be involved in the management of the project. Or he might have to provide proprietary information that might be of considerable use to competitor organizations or individuals. Such information need not be provided to the clearinghouse as part of the review package. 
The reasons for this.are severalfold: 
Privileged information is generally of the type that could be used by others to the disadvantage of the applicant. 
The primary function of the clearinghouse is --or should be --analysis of the substantive aspects of the proposed project for its potential impact on the community. Presumably, the funding agency requires privileged information of this type to assure itself that the applicant is equipped to carry out the project in which Federal monies are being invested. 
Pam 210-4 . 
However, such privileged information usually does not apply to the project itself. It would not include, for instance, informa
•
tion about the proposed proj ec'f'Oudget, staffing patterns, salary schedules, or ·he like. In case of any doubt, appropriate counsel should be sought. 
d. Renewals and Continuation Grants. The wording of paragraph 
4.g. has caused some confusion. It were better restated as follows: 
"Applications for annual renewal or continuation grants 
are subject to review upon request of the clearinghouse; 
and applications not submitted to or acted upon by the 
funding ag~ncy within one year after completion of the 
clearinghouse review are subject to re-review upon the 
request of the clearinghouse." 

There is also some confusion as to what constitutes a renewal o~ continuation grant. The answer hinges on whether the application includes new substantive activities or substantive change~ in activities originally proposed. Examples of applications not subject to the whole process would include: -----
Applications for funds for the second year of a twoyear project, the original application for which identified all of the activities to be undertaken over the two-year period, and which involve no substantive 
•
change; or 
Applications for extension of time or additional 
funds necessary to complete a project that involve 
no substantive change. 

By "substantive" we mean new or changed activities that may alter the direction, nature, scope, location or scale of the project or activity being supported or which might involve changes in the beneficiary population or target group being served. It does not involve purely administrative changes: accounting, auditing, personnel, contracting, etc., that deal with project management. 
Under some programs, the same organization is funded from year-toyear to carry out the same type of activity. However, the specific activities undertaken will vary from year to year. For example, HUD funds comprehensive planning agencies on an annual basis. The application contains a generalized multi-year work program and a detailed work program for the current year. The contents of the annual detailed work programs change in content and specificity. Therefore, this type of application cannot be considered as application for a continuation or extension grant and must go through the normal A-95 review. 
E -24 
P&JD 210-4 

Clearinghouses may want to review renewal or continuation grants even though the substance of the activity carried on remains unchanged, when they have reason to think that the circumstances have changed, so that the program carri~J ·~t under the projectshould be altered to fit the new circumstances. 
5. Subject Matter of Comments and Recommendations 
Paragraph 5 indicates some of the aspects of project proposa~s to which clearinghouses may want to address their comments. Most of these are taken verbatim from Title IV of the IntergovernmentalCooperation Act and Section 102(2) (C) of the National Environmental Quality Act. 
However, the list of items or considerations under Paragraph 5 are susgestions only. The clearinghouse need not address each question, nor is it constrained by Paragraph 5 from discussing any aspect of a proposal, whether or not listed. And, of course, as noted above,the clearinghouse need not comment at all on any given proposal.In fact, clearinghouses should try to develop a screening process to weed out projects with no areawide or interjurisdictional
spillover, so that they may devote their review resources to projects with potential intergovernmental impact. However, individual mayors or county boards of supervisors may wish to look at all projects proposed in their jurisdictions. When such requesrs-aremade of clearinghouses by individual jurisdictions, the clearinghouses will assure them such opportunity and make sure their comments are transmitted to the applicant. 
As noted, the listing of appropriate matters to consider in evaluating a proposed project is by no means exhaustive. There are 
other considerations that may be taken into account. For instance: 
The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470) and Executive Order 11593, "Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment" (16 U.S.C. 470), as implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation in 36 C.P.R. Part 800, establish a mandatory review process for Federal, federally assisted, and federallylicensed undertakings affecting certain historic properties.The historic preservation review requires the identification of properties within the potential impact area of a project that are included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Regist~r of Historic Places, maintained bythe National Park Service, Department of the Interior. When there is an effect on such a property, the AdvisoryCouncil on Historic Preservation must be afforded an opportunity to comment. Projects or activities that have 
E -25 

Pam 210-4 
potential for affecting historic, architectural, archeological, or cultural properties should be submitted byclearinghouses to the State Historic Preservation Officer. This will alert the applicant to potentialproblems involving historic resources and provide an opportunity to initiate early compliance with the independent review requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act and Executive Order 11593. 
The clearinghouse may want to comment on the question of whether the private sector is better equipped to carry out the project in question. There has been a growinginterest in the potential for savings by contractingfor services rather than their direct provision by the locality. There has been experimentation in such diverse areas as education and trash collection with this consideration in mind. 
The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 92-234)is a program of flood insurance administered by HUD, which is designed to discourage inappropriate development in flood prone areas and to mitigate the impact of flood disasters. Therefore, clearinghouses may want to assess the extent to which a proposed project may affect or be affected by flood hazards. 
6. Federal Agency Procedures 
• 
Paragraph 6 has been strengthened in several ways. The first is by giving more explicit direction to funding agencies with respectto applications that are submitted without evidence that they have fulfilled A-95 requirements. Agencies are directed to return applications that do not carry such evidence to the applicantwith directions to fulfill the requirements. The evidence can consist of two things: either attached comments from the clearinghouses or a certification by the applicant that he has providedeither or both clearinghouses with the appropriate opportunity to review his application and has received no comments. 
It should be noted that comments from one clearinghouse only is insufficient evidence. State clearinghouse comments are not a substitute for areawide clearinghouse comments --nor vice versa. Comments from both must be included with the applicati~-or,if one or the other has not responded, a certification to that effect. If, as in some States, there is an arrangement between the State and areawide clearinghouses that one or the other serves as the single point for submitting applications for review and for tendering comments of both back to the applicant, that 
• 
E -26 

Pam 210-4 
• 

feature should be noted. However, in such cases, whichever is the clearinghouse to wh.ich applications :1rc submitted :;hould state that ouc or the other ha~; no comments, if such is the case. 
Clearinghouses must be notified of any action taken on an application within seven working days after such action has been taken. SF 424 is normally used (unless waived by OMB) for providing such information. That form carries information, certified by the applicant, about which clearinghouses the application has been submitted to and a certification that all comments have been attached to the application (or that none have been received). This further reinforces the requirement noted above that applications not carrying evidence of A-95 review be returned to the 
applicant. 
Where funding agencies approve an application contrary to the recommendation of a clearinghouse, they are required to explain in writing to the clearinghouse why its recommendation was not accepted. Such an explanation should accompany the action notification on SF 424. 
A new element in paragraph 6 is a requirement to the effect that, where a clearinghouse has pointed out that a proposed project way conflict with or duplicate an activity funded by another Federal agency, the funding agency must consult with that agency prior to approving the proposed project. There is, unfortunately, ample opportunity for conflict or duplication to occur --for instance, HEW, DOL, CSA, and ACTION all administer programs designed specifically to assist the elderly. 
7. Housing Programs 
Paragraph 7 describes the specialized review process devised to cover Federal housing assistance programs of HUD, USDA, and VA. The review process is shortened for these programs, and the formal Telationship is between the Federal agency and the clearinghouses rather than between applicant and clearinghouses. A minimum size .is set for housing projects subject to review, and the requirement applies only to new construction or substantial rehabilitation, but it does cover loans, loan guarantees, mortgage insurance or other housing assistance. 
a. Review Process. Basically, the process works like this: a developer will submit an application to the Federal agency, that is preliminary in nature, the purpose of which is to establish the feasibility and/or eligibility of the proposed project for the 
E -27 

Pam 210-4 
type of assistance sought. The application contains a description 
•
of the project, detailed enough for evaluation purposes but lack
ing detailed construction plans. The Federal agency will send copies to the clearinghouses which have 30 days (plus four days roiling time) to review it and to submit any comments back to the agency. The 30-day period is a floor, and agencies will generally accept comments until the time (beyond 30 days) when their own evaluation is complete. 
Some HUD offices have urged or even required developers to contact the clearinghouses before submitting applications to HUD. This enables the developer to acquaint himself with the review process, and in the case of any particular project, to identify any potential difficulties that could cause delay or even rejection of the project. A new amendment to this paragraph provides an alternative to the prescribed process that follows this approach. That is, the developer may request a review of his project before applying to HUD, USDA or VA. The extent to which this approach is used and associated procedures should be worked out between the regional offices of the Federal agencies and the clearinghouses in each region. 
b. Size of Projects Subject to Review. The minimum size of proposed housing projects subject to review is lower in rural areas than in urban. The break point between the two types of areas is defined by the "urbanized area" concept of the Bureau of the Census. This distinction which increases the territory 
•
where the lower minimums would prevail is new in the 1976 revision. An urbanized area, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, is, basically, a city with a population of 50,000 or more, plus all contiguous incorporated places and areas with a population density of over 1,000 persons per square mile. Urbanized areas are delineated on maps in the U.S. Censuses of Population and of Housing (State volumes). 
Minimum subdivisions in the urbanized areas are 25 lots or more, in other areas, ten. For units in multifamily projects, comparable figures are 50 and 25; for mobile home courts, 50 and 25 spaces; and for college housing, 200 and 100 students. 
c. Exemption. A new provision of the 1976 revision of A-95 provides that additional units in a substantially completed subdivision are not subject to review. This is a somewhat misunderstood idea. A substantially completed subdivision is one that is partially built up and is completed with respect to water and sewer facilities, culverts, and other such facilities. It is also one which the Federal agency has not yet evaluated, because 
it has been built up with conventional or other financing. 
• 
E -28 

Pam 210-4 
• 

What is not well understood is that these Federal agencies do not finance subdivisions, they finance houses. That is, a developer approaches HUD, for instance, to seek HUD certification 
that houses to be built in a subdivision will be eligible (forindividual purchasers) for Federal subsidy, loans, loan guaranties, or nortgage insurance, as the case may be. Such certification will make it easier for the developer to secure financing and to sell the houses when built. HUD only evaluates the subdivision plan to assure that it meets HUD standards for subdivision 
development before making assistance available to home buyers. 
Thus, in the case of additional units in a substantially com
pleted subdivis.ion, the developer has already secured all the necessary local approvals (i.e., zoning, subdivision regulations,
etc.). However, now he is seeking, perhaps, HUD approval for assistance to low or moderate income homebuyers for the remainder of houses to be built in that subdivision. It must still meet HUD subdivision standards, but the evaluative contribution that 
• 
clearinghouses may make is substantially diminished. It should also be remembered that HUD, USDA, and VA programs account for only a small proportion of housing construction, although banks and thrift institutions which account for most housing finance also receive Federal assistance in the form of insurance on 
deposits by their clientele. Thus, even if the developer is turned down by HUD, he may receive conventional financing but 
the additional houses he builds in the subdivision will have to be sold in a market of unassisted purchasers. 
d. Content of Housing Reviews. When housing programs were first put under A-95, it was expected that the main interest of
the clearinghouses would be in the information provided about the scale and direction of growth, rather than in performing
substantive reviews. As it has developed, their interests are
much more substantial. Reviews, for many clearinghouses, have 
focused on the impact of proposed housing projects on the supply
of facilities and services, available and projected, for serving
the new inhabitants of these developments. Many of the clearing
houses have developed checklists and canvassed area and local 
agencies on the adequacy, for the new development, of: 
Water ·and waste disposal facilities; 
Transportation; 
Schools; 
Police and fire services; 
Hospitals and health services; 
Recreational facilities and services. 
E -19 

Pam 210-4 
Moreover, fundamental environmental questions are considered: 
adequacy of soils to support proposed development, flood hazards, 
and tree-cutting, grading and runoff problems. Similarly, 
economic impact analyses are made,especially of impacts on the 
local tax base. 

8. Coverage, Exceptions, and Variations 
a. Exceptions and Variations. Paragraph 8, perhaps the most 
significant change in the 1976 revision of A-95, has been dis
cussed earlier in this handbook. It sets out the objectives and 
limitations for deciding whether a program should or should-not 
be covered by the PNRS. It also provides criteria for exempting 
certain types of projects under a program that is otherwise 
covered. That is, if certain kinds of projects meet the criteria 
for exempting whole programs, it is reasonable eriough to expect 
that project categories exhibiting the same characteristics should 
also be exempted from the requirement. 

Paragraph 8 also provides for variations on usual review proce
dures. These will usually be of a temporary nature, due to the 
tight time requirements often associated with starting up new 
programs. However, with the increasing trend to block grants, 
it may be necessary to devise new procedural approaches that can 
satisfy the review requirements as well as the needs of the 
applicant. 

• 
In the past, OMB has granted procedural variations based on the 
often delayed availability of funds due to slow and erratic 
appropriations processes. However, it has seemed to OMB that 
applications do get prepared for ongoing programs during the 
time prior to funds becoming available. Therefore, OMB will no 
longer, except in unusual circumstances,' grant variations 
(usually involving simultaneous submission of applications to 
funding agencies and to clearinghouses) on this basis, suggesting 
rather that agencies advise potential applicants to complete the 
A-95 review requirements pending fund availability. 

b. Coverage. Not infrequently, there have been objections 
to including a program under PNRS on the basis that clearing
houses would not have the expertise to' evaluate projects under 
such programs. This has been particularly true with respect to 
human resources programs. Certainly it is true that, at least 
in the·past, clearinghouses have been primarily oriented to 
physical development. Nevertheless, even in dealing with land 
use, transportation, and community facilities, clearinghouses 
have inevitably had to deal with human resource questions. The 
interfaces between transportation and employment, for instance, 

E -30 
Pam 210-4 
• 

or health and the environment has led many to develop considerable sensitivity to these relationships. Moreover, a good many o'f the areawide clearinghouses, are also, variously, law enforcement planning agencies, comprehensive health or manpower planning agencies, as well as comprehensive land use and physical development planning agencies and consequently have developed iome expertise in those areas. 
~owever, the most important capability for a clearinghouse in undertaking review responsibility for a variety of new programs in areas in which they may have relatively little staff expertiseis the ability, first, to identify the relationships between any proposed project and oth~r functional areas; and, second, to identify the agencies in the area that can provide critical and/ or expert inputs into the review. Few clearinghouses have the resources to employ all of the expertise they need to carry on the A-95 review for all programs covered, even before expansion. Inevitably, most clearinghouses have to turn to other agencies, public and private, to supply expert analysis to supplement their own. 
The programs covered by the PNRS are listed in Attachment D of 
the Circular. They are also listed in Appendix I of the Catalog 
of Federal Domestic Assistance. However, the two lists do not 
always Jibe. This is, 1n part, because the two lists are pub
lished at different times. Also, program references in the 
Catalog frequently change from one edition to the other as 
agenc1es may group formerly separate programs or, conversely, 
disaggregate one program listing into several. In the future, 
OMB will endeavor to conform any changes in forthcoming editions 
of the Catalog with the Attachment D listing through issuance of 
an Administrative Note on the subject. 
A number of States have extended A-95 review requirements to a broader range of programs than listed in Attachment D. This is generally done under State law or a Governor's executive order. Therefore, applicants for assistance under those programs in 
such States are bound by the State law and must submit their applications for review. However, the States which have such 
laws are responsible for their enforcement. Applicants should 
ascertain the existence of such laws extending A-95 coverage to 
assure that their applications are not delayed, 
There is some confusion as to why Circular No. A•95, Treasury Circular 1082 (formerly OMB Circular No. A-95), and Federal Management Circular 74-7 (formerly A-102) do not all cover the same programs. The basic reason is that the several circulars have quite different, although not entirely unrelated objectives. 
E -31. 
Pam 210-4 
FMC 74-7 aims at standardization of administrative require
•
ments for programs of grants to State and local government. 
TC 1082 has as its objective informing States of grant
awards made to governmental units and agencies within· the 
State. 
A-95 has as its objective providing State and local govern
ment with opportunity to influence the award of Federal 
assistance under those programs affecting State, areawide, 
or local development. 
FMC 74-7 and TC 1082 generally cover only programs providing grants 
to State and local government, while A-95 includes not only grants
but loans and loan guaranties and insurance programs. Many of 
those assisted under A-95 covered programs are not State and local 
governments but quasi-public and private organizations or even 
individuals. On the other hand, TC 1082 and FMC 74-7 cover a 
number of programs of grants to State and local government that 
paragraph 8 of A-95 would exclude from coverage because they are 

not germane to the objectives of A-95. Consequently, to make 
coverage identical might appear scperficially neat, but it would 
result in considerable subversion of objectives and an unnecessary

flow of paper. 
9. Joint Funding 
Under a variety of different authorities, but primarily under the 
Joint Funding Simplification Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-510), applica
tions for a variety of related activities under different programs 
can be combined into a single application and administe.red, in 
effect, as a single project.. Paragraph 9 of Part I provides
that where one or more elements in a joint funding application
is for activities under a program covered by Part I, the whole 
application is subject to the review requirements of Part I. 

This new paragraph replaces reference to "Multisource Programs"
under Part III of the Circular. 

10. Additional Questions on Part I 
a. Financial SuEPort for A-95 Review. There is no specific
financial support provided for the A-95 review process by the 
Federal Government. However, support is authorized in the Public 
Works and Economic Development Amendments of 1974, and the 
Economic Development Administration has provided some assistance 

to Economic Development Districts which are clearinghouses.
Similarly, HUD has considered A-95 review an eligible work item 
for clearinghouses assisted by the 701 program. Further, under 

E -32 
Pam 210-4 
some conditions the costs of A-95 reviews may be considered eligible overhead costs under various planning programs carried o~t by clearinghouses. While OMB does not have other thanimpressionistic evidence, it appears that the greater share of 
A-95 review costs is paid for by clearinghouses with State and local funds.
l 
A closely related question is that of fees for clearinghouse review. OMB does not feel that it can prevent clearinghouses from trying to charge applicants fees for reviewing their applications pursuant to A-95. At the same time, OMB does point 
out to applicants that they are under no obligation to pay a fee for such a review. The only obligation of the applicant is to give the clearinghouse an opportunit~ to review his application. If the clearinghouse does not take a vantage of that opportunity 
within the allotted time, the applicant is free to submit his application to the funding agency with a statement to the effect 
that he has followed the requirements of A-95 and has received no comment from the clearinghouse. 
Aside from this, it is the OMB view that fees are undesirable, 
as they are conducive to log-rolling and other practices not in 
keeping with the objectives of A-95. Support for A-95 reviews 
from whatever source preferably should not be on a per project 
basis, but should be generalized, so that there can be no sus
picion that any individual project is endorsed because of the 
review payment attached to it. 
b. Relationshi~ of A-95 and Environmental Impact Statements. 
There has been cons1derable confusion as to the role of the 
clearinghouses in implementing Section 102(2)(C) of the National 

Environmental Quality Act which deals with environmental impact
statements (EIS's). Section 102(2)(C) calls, in effect, for 
inputs into the development and evaluation of EIS's by State 
and local agencies authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards. The A-95 clearinghouses provide a vehicle for securing 
these inputs, and the review process specifically represents the means by which such inputs into the development of the EIS can be achieved. 
The relationship is spelled in detail in the Council on Environ
mental Quality's EIS guidelines, as follows: 
"1. OMB Circular No. A-95 through its system of clearinghouses 
provides a means for securing the views of State and local environ

mental agencies, which can assist in the preparation of impact 
statements. Under A-95, review of the proposed project in the 

case of federally assisted projects (Part I of A-95) generally 
E -33 
Pam 210-4 
takes place prior to the preparation of the impact statement.
Therefore, comments on the environmental effects of the proposed
project that are secured during this stage of the A-95 process
represent inputs to the environmental impact statement. 
"2. In the case of direct Federal development (Part II of
A-95), Federal agencies are required to consult with clearing
houses at the earliest practicable time in the planning of the
project or activity. Where such consultation occurs prior to
completion of the draft impact statement, comments relating to
the environmental effects of the proposed action would also rep
resent inputs to the environmental impact statement. 

"3. In either case, whatever comments are made on environmental effects of proposed Federal or federally assisted projects
by clearinghouses, or by State and local environmental agencies
through clearinghouses, in the course of the A-95 review should
be attached to the draft impact statement when it is circulated
for review. Copies of the statement should be sent to the
agencies making such comments. Whether those agencies then elect
to comment again on the basis of the draft impact statement is amatter to be left to the discretion of the commenting agency
depending on its resources, the significance of the project, and
the extent to which its earlier comments were considered in pre
paring the draft statement. 
"4. The clearinghouses may also be used, by mutual agreement,for securing reviews of the draft environmental impact statement.However, the Federal agency may wish to deal directly with appropriate State or local agencies in the review of impact statements
because the clearinghouses may be unwilling or unable to handlethis phase of the process. In some cases, the Governor may havedesignated a specific agency, other than the clearinghouse, forsecuring reviews of impact statements. In any case, the clearinghouses should be sent copies of the impact statement. 
"5. To aid clearinghouses in coordinating State and localcomments, draft statements should include copies of State andlocal agency comments made earlier under the A-95 process andshould indicate on the summary sheet those other agencies fromwhich comments have been requested, as specified in Appendix Iof the CEQ Guidelines." 
c. The Federal Interest in PNRS. While it should be obviousenough, Federal agencies administering the Federal taxpayers'dollars have an obligation to see that program funds are used aseffectively as possible. Therefore, the potentialities under
PNRS for revealing possible conflicts that could cancel out thebeneficial effects of Federal assistance among programs or between 
E -34 
Pam 210-4 
jurisdictions can help the Federal administrator fulfill this obligation. Or, put more positively, PNRS can reveal opportuni
ties for improving the cost effectiveness of projects by making them more complementary or combining them, thus reducing, not 
only conflict, but expensive duplication. As noted earlier, Federal internal review procedures may be effective in evaluating 
a proposed project in its own terms, but they will not generally reveal the external impacts of a project that can make or break it. However, positive clearinghouse comments --or even "no 
comment" --can give reassurance to the Federal administrator that external effects of a project are either beneficial or minimal. 
PART II: DIRECT FEDERAL DEVELOPMENT 
1. Scope of Requirement 
Part II requires that Federal agencies which engage in direct
development of Federal projects such as Federal civil works, 
military or scientific installations, public buildings, etc., 
must consult with State and local governments that might be 
affected by those projects. Where projects are not in conform
ity with State, regiorial, or local plans the Federal agency will 
be required to justify any departures. The requirement applies 
not only to construction but to the acquisition, use, and dis
posal of Federal real property. 
Of particular note is the definition of "direct Federal development" in the definitions section of A-95 (Part V). The definition includes not only development undertaken by Federal agencies but development undertaken for the use of the Federal Government or 
any of its agencies. Thus, Federal lease-purchase developments 
or developments undertaken specifically for lease or sale to the 
Federal Government would be included. It also includes leasing 
existing property where the Federal use will involve a change 
f~om the existing use by type, intensity, or scale. 
In addition, in the preparation of environmental impact state
ments pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act, Federal dev~lopment agencies are required to seek the 
views and comments of State and local environmental agencies. 
Regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality indicate the 
clearinghouses as the appropriate channel through which to 
secure the required State and local views and comments. 
E -35 
Pam 210-4 
2. Implementation 
•
Various executive office and congressional constraints on direct
Federal development inhibit the use of the normal Part I Project
Notification and Review System for these kinds of projects. For
instance, under many direct Federal development programs, a pro
ject does not begin to have a real potential until it is included

in the President's Budget. After that, it must still be approved
by both the substantive and appropriations committees in both
houses of Congress. In some cases, agencies are constrained in

the timing and amount of information they can disclose at
various stages in the planning process. In other cases, the
possibility of land speculation may prevent consultation with State

and local government until the site is secured by option or pur
chase. 

The nature and intensity of these constraints may vary widely
among programs involving Federal development. Consequently, the
1976 revision requires the agencies which do have such constraints
to set forth in their regulations the time at which consultation

will commence, what minimal information will be provided, how
long a period will be provided for review, and how information

on project action will be fed back to clearinghouses. 
In the case of larger permanent Federal installations or property
holdings, an alternative was suggested in the 1976 revision.
This was for the Federal agency to execute a memorandum of agree
ment on planning and development coordination with the appropriate
State and areawide clearinghouses in the jurisdiction of which
the Federal installation or holdings are located. The idea, of
course, is to work out arrangements for coordinating planning
and development on the installation or holdings with that carried
out by State and local government. 

It is not always understood that development activities of State
and local government can severely impact upon the effectiveness
with which the Federal property can be used. For instance, in

one southwest city, a zoning variance would have permitted the
construction of a high rise building right in the flight path ofa military airfield. Luckily, the potential conflict was discovered in time to prevent the development. However, the concernof the military over what they term, "civilian encroachment,"makes the memorandum of ~greement approach most attractive. 
3. Federal Licenses and Permits 
A substantial number of activities which may affect areawide andlocal development are carried out by nongovernmental or private
sector organizations under permit from various Federal departments 
E -36 
Pam 210-4 
• 
and agencies. Such activities might involve such matters as 
power plant siting, estuarine development, mineral exploitation 
op public lands, and similar activities, ·largely in the natural 
resources area. Another innovation in the 1976 revision of A-95 
urges Federal agencies which are authorized to grant licenses 
and permits for activities affecting State, areawide, or local 
plans and programs or the environment to consult with clearing
houses on applications for such licenses and permits. Most 
Federal agenci~s having such licensing or permitting functions 
have indicated their intention to take this A-95 exhortation 
seriously. 
4. Medical Facilities Require•ents 
One element of this Part that has proved somewhat confusing to clearinghouses is actually a transplant from an earlier OMB 
ctrcular (No. A-57) that was rescinded. The requirement applies t~ Federal medical facilities such as VA or military hospitals. When considering whether or not to recommend the inclusion of 
proposed new medical facilities (or expansions to existing facilities) in the President's Budget, OMB requires that the 
Federal agencies proposing such facilities accompany their proposals with the comments and recommendations of State and area
wide health planning agencies. Under the 1976 revision, the comments of clearinghouses are also required to be included. Since A-95 clearinghouses will also review many or most such 
proposals under Part II, provision is made for the clearinghouses as the appropriate point of entry into the review system through 
which the comments of health planning agencies and clearinghouses will be secured. What should be made clear is that this is not a·variation on the review process itself. What it means is that comments of the clearinghouses and the health agencies do not 
stop with the Federal agency; as they do in all other situations. It means that in the case of Federal health facilities, the comments must accompany the agency budget submission to OMB. 
PART Ifl: STATE PLANS 
Numerous Federal formula grant programs require, as a precondition of a State qualification for its allocation, that the State submit a State plan (sometimes called ·"operational plans," or "plans of 
work" or similar terms). These are highly variable in nature a~d content. While some are plans in the conventional sense -"What we want to do and how we expect to do it" --others only indicate the basic administrative apparatus or arrangements under 
which the program will be carried out. However, almost all do require associated documentation which provides information about 
E -3-7 

Pam 210-4 
•
the specific activities for which program monies will be spent,
even though this information does not appear in the "plan" it
self. However, it is either required to be submitted with the
plan or to be prepared and available for inspection by Federal

program personnel. Part III defines "plan" as including, not
only the formal plan document, but these associated materials. 

The plan, as defined, must be submitted pursuant to Part III to
the Governor (or his designee) for evaluation. The evaluation

is based on the relationship of the plan to other State plans and
programs and to gubernatorial development policies. 

The Governor is urged, although not required, to involve the
areawide clearinghouses in State plan review where activities
to be undertaken under the plan will have an ide~tifiable impact
on areawide or local plans and programs. In a number of States
the involvement of areawide clearinghouses in State plan review is
established policy, as contributing an extra, most useful dimension
to State plan evaluation. 

A guide to programs covered under Part III can also be found in
Appendix I of the Catal~g 6f Fed~ral Do~e~tic Assistance. 

In the previous (1973) edition of Circular No. A-95, there was
another element in Part III, "Multisource Programs." This has

been eliminated, although the same types of programs are nowdealt with under "Joint Funding," paragraph 9 of Part I of the
Circular. 
PART IV: COORDINATION OF PLANNING IN MULTIJURISDICTIONAL· AREAS 
Part IV was developed originally to offset a growing tendencyamong Federal programs to promote areawide or multijurisdictionalplanning for various purposes. Such planning activities wereuncoordinated geographically, functionally, and organizationally.
In nonmetropolitan areas this frequently would lead to a seriousdrain on already limited planning resources. In metropolitan
areas it has intensified confusion and general duplication of
effort. 
Part IV of the Circular is closely related to Part I. By encouraging the States to develop systems of substate planning areas, itsets the stage for a more complege geographic coverage of the
Project Notification and Review System. Similarly, the PNRS, byrequiring clearinghouse review of projected planning and developmentactivities under various Federal programs, sets the stage for themore systematic and continuing planning coordination envisioned
under Part IV. 
E -38 
Pam 210-4 
Originally, the primary thrust of Part IV was to bring a measure 
of conformity, or at least consistency, in the geography of plMn ni11g areas. This is an important precondition or cCI"ectivc coordination arrangements among various areawide pl:JJJning :H·tivi ties. As States have developed suhstatc district systems --mos have, and a majority are operational --and as progrt'SS ha.-· been maLle in conforming federally tlcsign<Jtcd planning :trcas with them, the thrust and emphasis has moved to improvin~~ arr:tn~'.crncnt for Cully coordinating areawide Cuncti.onal pl:1nning with till' comprehensive planning carried on by the suhstatc district organ·· izations. 
In 1972, OMB asked the major public interest groups representing State and local government* to evaluate Federal agency implementation of Part IV. A m~jor recommendation of tkit study w:.~; that Federal agencies utilize, to the greatest dc 1: rec pass i hle, the substate district organizations (called "umbrcl:la multi.Judsdictional organizations" --"UMJOs" --in the stttdy) to meet areawide planning requiremcnts. The UMJOs were des cr j bed as lw i ng predominantly composed of elected officials of general local government. Where responsibility for carrying out areawide functional planning is vested in an agency other than the U~IJO, the study recommended that policy control he vested in the llMJO. A policy statement embodying these general ic.leas has been :1doptcd by most of the public interest groups participating in the study. 
:1
The Advisory Commission on Tntergovcrnmcnt:JI Rclntions,** in 
massive study of subst:ttc regionalism, adopted si111ilar rccoPlllll'II<Lltions, although substantially stronger. 
Part IV reflects the gc·ncral thrust o[ the }llthlic interest .'~rt)llp 
and ACIR recommendations. It docs this in t1vo ways: 
It encourages, but does not require, Federal agend es 
administering programs assisting or requiring areawide 
planning to utilize the substate district organizations 
(almost always A-95 clearinghouses) to carry out such 
planning. 
It requires that the regulations of programs supporting areawide planning provide for a memorandum of agreement, when the organization being funded for areawide planning is not the district organization, bct~cen tltat organization 
Council of State Governments, National Covernors'Conference,
* 
National Legislative Conference, Nation;ll League of Cities, 
li.S. Conference of Mayors, National Association of Counties, 
and Internation<.~l City Management Association. 
** The ACIR is a statutorily established intergovernmental research 
organization, the membership of which represents Federal and 
State executive and legislative branches, counties, municipali
ties, and the public. 

E -39 
Pam 210-4 
and the district organization. In the case of interstate metropolitan areas, the required agreement would be between the interstate A-95 areawide clearinghouse and any applicant for multijurisdictional planning assistance. The memorandum of agreement would identify the means bywhich the two would coordinate their related planning activities. 
The agreement would include provisions for joint studies and utilization of resources, organizational arrangements, and utilization of common and consistent statistics, projections, and assumptions about the area and its future. The latter is extremely important, both in terms of resource savings and in eliminating one of the basic sources of plan conflicts. 
The achievement of these coordinative arrangements, then, is a necessary concomitant effort with conforming jurisdictionalboundaries of areawide planning agencies; for a common territorial base by itself does not assure coordination. There must be contact, communication, and cooperation between organizations planning for various aspects of area development for that to occur. 
While Part IV indicates the various subject matter to be covered in the agreement, it does not prescribe the form or substance of the agreement. Those are matters to be negotiated between the two organizations. Where an agreement cannot be consummated, Part IV provides that the organization applying for assistance must indicate in the application the issues which have prevented agreement. The funding agency, in cooperation with the Federal Regional Council and the State clearinghouse, would assist the two organizations to resolve the issues and conclude an agreement. If no resolution is possible after 30 day~ the funding agency could award the grant, if the application is otherwise in good order. Of course, it could also refuse to award the grant unless an agreement were concluded. 
If the applicant organization is applying for areawide planningassistante for an area greater than or not coterminous with that of the substate district (or the A-95 areawide clearinghousejurisdiction in the case of interstate metropolitan areas), it would have to develop memoranda of agreement with each substate district (or interstate areawide clearinghouse) into which that area extends. 
The major programs assisting areawide planning (not necessarily exclusively) are: 
.HUD: 	Comprehensive planning (701) program 
DOT: 	Urban highway planning 
Mass transportation planning 

•

Airport systems planning
E -40 
Pam 210-4 
EPA: 	Water quality management planning 
Air pollution control planning 
Solid waste planning 

HEW: 	Health systems planning 
Planning for the aged 

DOL: 	Multijurisdictional manpower planning 
USDA: 	Resource conservation and development planning 
CSA: 	Community action planning 
EDA: 	Economic development district planning 
NOAA: 	Coastal zone management planning 
ARC: 	Local development district planning 
LEAA: 	Law enforcement planning 
SUMMARY 
OMB Circular No. A-95 is fundamentally an effort to create a climate where intergovernmental cooperation can take root and 
flourish. It does this by creating opportunities for contacts and communic~tion within and among the .several levels of govern
ment. This contact and communication is a necessary precondition for coordination. 
In order to take full advantage of those opportunities, it is 
important that the various actors think of the requirements as opportunities, rather than as administrative obstacles: 
The applicant should recognize the opportunity to develop a better project through avoidance of conflict ~nd the discovery of means for getting the most value for its investment. 
The Federal agency should recognize the opportunity for increasing program effectiveness through the same means and through applicant awareness of the need for ?Ound planning and coordination. 
• 

The clearinghouses should recognize the opportunities for providing real service to applicants and Federal agencies, which will enhance clearinghouse credibility and status 
' 
as a constructive force in the area or in the management 
of the State government. 
E -41 
Pamm 210-4 
In sum, the regulations promulgated under Office of Managementand Budget Circular No. A-95 are aimed at promoting more effective
coordination of planning and development activities carried 
on 
or assisted by the Federal Government. The major device of A-95is encouragement of systematic communications between the Federal Government and State and local governments in carrying out relatedplanning and development activities. Used judiciously by Stateand local governments and regional bodies, the processes set forthin A-95 can result in more expeditious, more effective, and moreeconomical development of physical, economic, and human resources. 
• 
•
E -42 

Pam 210-4 
EXHIBIT 1 
PROJECT NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW SYSTEM 
The following outlines the process of the "Project Notification System" de\reloped to implement, i11 part, Title IV of the Intergovermental Cooperation Act. 
Step 1 	~otential applicant desiring Federal assistance makes inquiries of Federal agency. 
Step 2 	~~nJi~g agency informs applicant that, among other things, it must notify both State and areawide clear
inghouses about the project for which it intends to apply for assistance. 
Step 3 	Applicant notifies clearinghouses. 
Step 4.a. 	State clearinghouse notifies State agencies which might 
have programs affected by proposed project, including where appropriate, environmental agencies and State agencies responsible for enforcing or furthering the objectives of civil rights laws. 
4.b. 	Areawide cl~aringhouse notifies local governments and agencies wh6se interests might he affected by the pro
posed project including, where appropriate, local and regional environmental agencies and public agencies responsible for en'forcing or furthering the objectives of civil rights laws. 
Step· 5 	State agencies, local governments, or others to whom hotifications have been sent inform appropriate clear
inghouse of any problems they may have with the proposed project. 
Step 6 	C~earinghouse may sign-off on the project, if there a~e 
rio problems; or, if there are problems or questions 
taised about the project, the clearinghouse may ~rrange 
tonferences with the applicant to discuss such questions 
Or 1ssues. 

Step 7 	tf questions or issues have been resolved, clearinghouse 
may sign-off on the application; or if is~ues remain, 
applicarit and clearinghouse (and any State or local 

interest) cooperate in developing the applicatidn to resolve the issues and strengthen the project. 
E -43 
Pam 210-4 
Step 8 	If issues remain by the end of the 30-day notification 
period, the clearinghouse should inform the applicantthat it will want to review the completed application,unless the issues are resolved prior to its comple.tion. 
Step 9 	If the clearinghouse ~~s requested a copy of the com
pleted application for information, when supportive
comments have already been provided to the applicant, 

or for review and comment, when issues have not been 
resolved, the applicant will supply a copy of the completed application to the clearinghouse. If the completed application is submitted for information, the applicant may submit the application to the funding agency at the same time. Where it is submitted for review and comment, the applicant will permit 30 daysfor the clearinghouse to s,ubmit comments. 
Step 10 	At the end of 30 days or whenever the applicant has 
received the comments of the clearinghouse, whichever 
is earlier, he may submit his application to the funding 
agency. However, the applicant must have comments or 
sign-off from both the State and areawide clearinghouses

(or no responses within the allotted time periods)before he is free to submit his application to the funding agency. All comments recieved from clearinghouses 
•
must accompany the application submitted to the funding 
agency. 
Step 11 	Funding agency considers application and attached com
ments and informs clearinghouses of action.taken thereon (using Standard Form 424, where appropriate). Where a project against which a clearinghouse has recommended is funded, the action notice is accompanied by an
explanation to the clearinghouse as to why its recom
mendations were not accepted. 
It is possible for the review process to come to a satisfactoryconclusion at any point at which ~learinghouses can inform theapplicant in writing of satisfaction with the project, as well as after Step 10. If an applicant has received no word from a
clearinghouse at the end of the 30-day notification period, he mayassume the clearinghouse has no further interest in the application.A clearinghouse which has not been able to get its comments on acompleted application to the application during the allotted 30days may submit his comments directly to. the funding agency whichwill consider them if its own application processing has not been
completed. 
• 
E -44 

PROJECT NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW SYSTEM 

TIME MAY ELAPSE
NOTIFICATION PERIOD 	-----1 APPLICATION REVIEW PERIOD ____,
BETWEEN PERIODS 
I 
STATE AGEN&tES 
2. 	SCH 
NEGOTIATION 

3.
OF 
ISSUES 
30 days 	,..1~ 30 days----------"~~ 
1. If issues have not been 	resolved1. Applicant sends notification to and/or clearinghouse has requestedState and areawide clearinghouse. 
application for review, applicant 
~ 
submits application to clearinghouse. ::r
2. 	Clearinghouses review and secure ,...... C1
views of State agencies and local 	,......
2. Clearinghouse prepares comments and rtgovernments. 
submits them to applicant. 
r\J 
3. Clearinghouses notify applicant 3. Applicant submits application along
a. If there are any issues; 	or 
or 	with all clearinghouse comments tob. Send supportive comments; 
funding agency. 	;
c. Defer comments and request ~ completed application for 
I 	.
.j::""" review . 	c ~ 
VI. 	.L 
• 

Pam 210-4 
APPENDIX F 

• 
MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 PART V 
OFFICE OF 
MANAGEMENT 
AND BUDGET 

• 

OMB A-95 DIRECTORY 
FOR STATE, 
METROPOLITAN, AND 
REGIONAL CLEARING 
HOUSES 

F -1 

Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
OFFICE OF 	MANAGEMENT A~D'BUDGET 
DIRECTORY 
State and Areawide A-95 Clearinghouses 
JANUARY 3, 1977.Attached is a listing of clearinghouses
arranged alphabetically by State accordIng to the 10 Standard Federal Regions.The clearinghouses are established pursuant to Part I of the procedures promulgated by the omce of Managementaild Budget Circular No. A-95 <Revised>.Areawide clearinghouses in metropolitan areas are established pursuant to thereq,uirements of section 204 of the Demonstration Cities a~d Metropolitan Development Act of 1966. State and otherareawide clearinghouses are designatedby Governors of the States pursuant torules and regulations developed by theOffice of Management and Budget underauthority of Title IV of the Intergovern
mental Cooperation Act of 1968.As new designations are made fromtime to time or changes made to existing
designations, this omce will send out addenda and amendments to the Directory.
Any inquiries should be directed to theIntergovernmental Relations and Regional Operations Division, Office ofManagement and Budget <395-3031) orto the Federal Regional Council A-95 Coordinator.The Directory may be reproduced. 
VINCENT Pl1RITANO,
Deputy Associate Director torIntergovernmental Relationsand Regional Operations. 
• 
F "' 2 
c 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
Nonca 
..

..

... 
...
., 
<5 
> 
-1 ~ ,. : "' 5
~ ~ ~ i . ~ i. • 
:. ;; " i ... .' 
j u s '; E 1 ~ ~ 
• 

'F -3 
OFFICE OF IIANAGI!MBII'l' AND B!IDGBT CIRCULAR NO. 95 (REVISED)
"".1 
S'l'ATII, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
CO!!J!J!CTICUT
~ 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Office of Intergovernmental Relations 
Department of Finance and control 
340 capitol Avenue 
Hartford 06115 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
Bridgeport. Conn•• Cities Jersey City. N.J•• Ansonia Meriden, Conn., BridqeportNew Haven. conn., Derby Newark.. N.J., Meriden New York.. N.Y .. New Haven Norwalk. conn., Norwalk Paterson/Cliftioni'Passaic~ Shelton Stamford. conn., WaterburyWaterbury, conn.. and Naugatuck BoroughDanbury, conn. , 
Towns 
BeaCOn Falls Tri-State Regional Planning commission Bethany1 world Trade center, 82nd floor Bethel 
New York, New York 10048 	Branford Bridgewatez: Brookfield Cheshire 
Danbury 
Uarien 
East Haven Easton 
Fairfield Green wich Guildford Hamden Madison Middlebury Milford Monroe New Canaan New Fairfield New Milford Newton North Branford North Haven Orange Oxfo.Cd Prospect Redding Ridgefield Seymour Sherman southbury Stratford Thomaston Trumbull Wallinqford Watertown 
West haven Weston 
~stport 
Wilton Wolcott Woodbridge woodbury 
• 

Connecticut, cont'd Clearinqhouee 
Hartford 
Capitol Region Council of Governments 97 Elm street Hartford 06106 
New Britain and Bristol 
central connecticut Reqion 
Planning Aqency 12 Landry Street Bristol 06010 
New London/Groton/Norwich 
southeastern connecticut Regional 
Planninq Agency 139 Boswell Avenue Norwich 06360 
Jurisdiction 
New Jersey portion:counties Bergen 
Besex 
Budeon 

MidcUesex 
Monmouth 
Morris 
Passaic 
Somerset 
Onion 

New York portion: New York City Counties Dutchess 
Nassau 
Orange 
Putnam 
Rockland 
Suffolk 
westchester 

Hartford City 
Towns 
iiidc>Ver 
Avon 
Bloomfield 
Bolton: 
Canton 
East:. Granby 
East Hartford 
East Windsor 
Elliriqton 
Enfield 
Farmington 
Glastonbury 
Granby 
Hebron 
Manchester 
Marlborough 
Newington 
Roclt.y Hill 
somers 
Simsbury 

south Windsor 
Suffield 
Tolland 
Vernon 
West Hartford 
Wethersfield 
Windsor 
Windsor Locks 

Cities Bristol New Britain Towns Berlin Burlington Plainville Plymouth Southington 
Cities 
~don 
Norwich Towns 
BOir'ah 
East Lyme Franklin 
"'0 
a 

1...:1 
1-' 
= 
~ 
z 
0 
:::! 
n 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
• 


Connecticut. cont• d 	Connecticut~ cont'd 
Clearinshouse 	Jurisdiction
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
Griswold Northwestern connecticut. I!!!!!!!!Groton Regional Planning Aqency Canaan 
Ledyard P.O. Box JO cornwall Lisbon Warren 06754 Kent Montville 
North canaan North Stonington Roxbury 
Preston Salisbury Salem Sharon Sprague warren Stoninqton washinqton VoluntownWaterfordColchester 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES
(Other) 

Connecticut River Estuary Towns 
Reqii>nal Planninq Aqency Chester 
Westbrook Road Clinton 

P.o. Box 33S Deep River 
Essex 06Q26 Essex
Killingworth
Lyooe
Old Lpe
Old Saybrook
Westbrook 

Litchfield Hills Regional 	!l!!m!
Planninq Aqency Barkbaasted 
110 Main Street Colebrook 
TOrrington 06790 Goshen

HarwintonLitchfieldNorrisNew HartfordNorfolkTorringtonWinchester 
Kidstate Regional .Planning Agency TownS 
P.o. Box 139 crc;;:well 
Middletown 064S7 Durham
East Hadda11
East &upton
Haddillll
Middlefield
MiddletOOIII
Portland 

Northeastern Connecticut I2!m!
Regional Plt~nninq Agency Brooklyn 

P.o. Box 198 Canterbu.ry 
Brooklyn 0623' Eastford
Killinqly
Plainfield
Poolfret

PutnUl '· Sterling
Thompson
WOOdstock 
Windham Regional Planning Agency TOOIIIS 
21 Church Street Ashford 
W1111aant1c 06226 Chaplin 

colu.~tia
coventry
Ha11pton 
"%j 	LebanonMansfieldscotlandIUllinqton 
\J1 Windha. 
FEDERAL REGISTER, Vot.. 42, NO. 6-:--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
gz 
n
m
VI 
; 

Nl 
~
=I
,j:o.. 
"Zj OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
2 
STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOIJSES 
Massachusetts, cont1 d 
"C 
Ill
clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
0\ MASSACHUSETTS 9 Southborough 
Stoneham 	~ 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 	~
Stow Sudbury = Wakefield 
•I 
Office of state Planning Watertown 
John McCormack Buildinq Wayland
1 Ashburton Place weston 
Boston 0 2 1 08 Wilmington 

Winchester Norfolk county (part): AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Quincy City 
(Metropolitan) 	Towns Bellingham Braintree 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction Brooklin 
Canton 
.!!2!1!!!! Cohasset 

Dedha'" 
Metropolitan Area Planning Council Essex County (part) : Dover 
u School street Cities Poxboro 
Boston 021 08 ieVeriy Franklin 

Gloucester 	Holbrook 
Lynn Medfield Peabody IUllis salem Milton Towns Needham 
DaiiVirs 	Norfolk 
Essex 	Norwood 
Hamilton Randolph IJilswich SharQn Lynnfield Stoughton Manchester walpole Marblehead Wellesley Middleton westwood Nahant weymouth z 
Rockport 	wrentham 
0 
Saugus 	Plymouth County (part): ... 
Swampscott 	Towns 
n
Topsfield 	Duxbury 
m 
Wenhatn 	Hanover 
Middlesex County (part.) : 	Bingham 
"' 
Cities 	hull 
Cambridge Marshfield Everett Norwell Malden Pembroke• 
Mar!borough 	Rockland 
Medofra scituate Melrose Suffolk county Newton Worcester county (part): 
somerville Bol't.on Town waltham Woburn Brcx:kton 
Towns carlisle Old Colony Planninq Council Plymouth County (part): Hudson 232 Main Street Brockton City Acton Brockton 02Q01 Towns 
Arlinqton Abington Ashland Bridgewater Bedford East Bridgewater
Belmont 	Hanson 
Burlington Kingston Concord Plymouth Framingham west Bridgewater
Holliston 	Whitman 
Lexington Norfolk County (part): 
Lincoln Avon Town 
Littleton Briston County (part): 

Maynard Easton Town Medway 
Milford 
Natick 
North Reading 
Reading 
Sherborn 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
3 
Massachusetts. cant• d
Massachusetts. oont'd 
•
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
North Andover
Fall !liver and !lew Bedford 
Rowley 
southeastern Massachusetts Regional Bristol COUnty' (part) : 

Salisbury 
West Newbury 
District Attleboro 

Planninq and Econo•ic oevelopaent Cities 
Lowell
7 Barnabas Road 	Fall River 
Marion 02738 	Hew Bedford 
Northern Middlesex Area COIUlission Middlesex county (part) : 144 Merrimack Street Lowell City Taunton 
I!!!!!!!! 
Lowell 01852
Acushnet 	!2!m! 
Berkley 
Billerica Dartmouth 
chelasford 
Dracut Fairhaven 
Dighton Dunstable 
Pepperell Mansfield 
Freetc:M'l 
Tewksbury 
Tyngsborougb
MDrtb Att.leborougb 
wesUordNorton 
Raynh• 
Rehoboth 
Pittsfield Seekonk 
Berkshire County Regional Berkshire county Swansea 
SOllerset 
Planning oo..tssion 
10 Fenn Street
westport 
Plyo1011th County (part) : 

Pittsfield 01201 
Towns 
Spriragfield/Chicoppe/Bolvoke


carVer 
Lakeville 

Lower Pioneer valley Regional 	Counties
Marion 

Mattapoisett 
Planning CO.mission Ba11pden lll:ddleboro 
~6 Central street 	Ba•pshire 
West Springfield 01089
Rochester 
warehilll 

Worcester
Rorfoll< county 
PlainvUle Town 

Central Massachusetts Regional Worcester County (part): 
z 
Planninq Commission 	worcester City
fitcbburg/Leoainster 	0
70 Elm .street Towns ... Montachusetts Regional Planning Middlesex county (part) : 
Worcester 01609 	Auburn Barre 
n 
COIIUnission 	!!!!m!! 
Berlin

150 Main Street Ayer m Fitcbburq 01420 Shirley 
Blackstone Townsend 
Boylston worcester county (part) : 
Brookfield Charlton
ill!!!!! 
Douglas
Fitchburg Dudley East Brookfield
Gardner 

Leominster 
Grafton
Towns 
Hardwick
Clinton 
Bolden

Ashbumbaa 
HopedaleHubbardston 

Liecester
Lancaster 
Mendon
Lunenburg 
Sterling 
Millbury 
Ml:llvi1le
Telllpleton New Braintret!

weatadnster 
ll'orthborough

Winchendon 
Northbridge North Brookfield


Lavregoe/Baverhill 
oakham 
Merrimack Valley Regional Essex COUnty (part) : 

oxford 
Planninq OOmaission Cities 

Paxton Princeton

87 Winter Street 	Haverhill
t-xj 	Rutland
Haverhill 01830 	Lawrence 
Shrewsbury
~ 
Southbridge
Amesbury 

Spen~er ....... St~rbridge 
Andover· 
&oxford 

Georgetmm 
Groveland 
Nerri.IM.c 
Met:huen 


Rewburyport 
i
Newbury to.:! 
• """ 
= 
I FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 


5 
Massachusetts, cont•d
"rj 
""0
Clearinghouse 
Jurisdiction 
a
Sutton
CXl 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Other) 
Cape cod Planninq and Economic 
Development commission First District Courthouse Barnstable 02630 
Martha•s Vineyard Commission 
P. 0. Box 1447 oak Bluffs 02557 
Franklin Coun~y Planning Department 425 Main Street Greenfield 01301 
Nantucket Planning and Economic 
Development commission Town and County Buildinq Nantucket 02554 
•Applications for Pe~roke Town (Plymouth County) 
Upton 
Uxbridge 
warren 
Webster 
Wes-tborough 
West Boylston 
West Brookfield 
Barnstable county 
Dukes County 
Franklin County 
Nantucket Island 
are now cleared 
~ ~ 
= 
~ 
throuqh the Old Colony Planning Council (Brockton area clearinghouse) as well as through the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (Boston area clearinqhouse). 
z 
g 
n 
m 
"' 
• 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
n 

OFFICE OF MII.NAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCUlAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 2 
STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES Maine, cont1 d 

•
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
!!M!!!i 
Naples Sebago 
STATE CL~INGHOUSE 	Bridgton Harrison Otisfield 
Main State Clearinghouse 
Ex.ecut ive Department 
State of Maine 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
18-state Street (Other) 
Auqusta 04333 

southern Mid-Coast Reqional •wes~ern part of AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Planning Commission Mid-Coastal (Metropolitan) 52 Front St:reet District Bath 04530 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction Hancock county Regional •western part of 
Planning Commission Eastern Maine 
_Lewiston/Auburn P.O. Box 608 District 
Elsworth 0-605 
Androscoggin Valley Regional Androscoggin County 

Planning COmmission Cumberland county (part) : i:asteE"n Mid-Coast Regional •Eastern part of 
70 court street New Gloucester TOwn Planninq Commission Mid-Costal 
Auburn 04210 Franklin CoWlty 1123 Main Street District 
Kennebec {:ounty (part) : Box 836 
Fayette Town Rockland 0-841 

Oxford county (Part): To<ms North ~ennebec Reqional *Northern part of Buckfield Planninq Co~ission Kennebec District Hebron 16-1/2 Benton Avenue 
Rangeley Winslow Qq902 Upton 
Gilead 	Northern Maine Regional *Northern Maine 
Mason Planning Commission t)istrict Waterford P.o. Box 179 NOrway 2 Main Street 
z 
Oxford Caribou 04 736 Paris 
g 
West Paris Penobscot Valley Regional •Penobscot District Greenwood Planning CoDUnissiOn n Woodstock 31 Central Street 
m 
sumner Banqor 0''01 Hartford 
canton southern Xennebec Valley •soutem part of Deerfield Regional Planning commission Kennebec District Peru 16 Bangor Street: Mexico. Auqusta 04330 
RUalford 
Bethel Washington County Regional *Northeastern Maine Newry Planning Commission· District Andover P.O. Box 273 Roxbury Machias 04654 
Byron 
SOuthern Main Regional •southern Maine 
Portland Planning COmmission Diltrict 

Box Q 
Greater Portland council of Government CUmberland County (part) : 2 School Street 
331 Veranda Street mill sanfo·rd 04073 
south Portland 04103 Portland 

South Portland westbrook *Identification of jurisdictions for this district can be ascertained Towns by contacting the appropriate regional (or State) Clearinghouse. 
Cape Elizabeth 
Cumberland 
Falmouth 

Gorham 
Gray 
ScarboroUgh 
Windham 

1"%:1 	Yarmouth North Yarmouth Pownal "'C Standish 
\.0 	Raymond 
a
·casco 
~ 
.... 
= 
I FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 ~ 
~ 
l'%j OPFICB OF MNAGI!IIBNT ·AND BODGB'l' CIRCUlAR NO. A-95 (RBVISBD) 
STATE~ IIIITIIOPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CELARINGIIOUSBS 
,_. 
!!!!!! !IIU!l'8HIRB 
S'I'ATB CLBAIIINGBOOSB 
Coordinator of Federal Funds 
Office of the GoVernor 
state Bouse ' 
Concord 0330 1 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOIISES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinahouee 
Manchester 
SOuthern New Haatpshire Planning 
O)mmission 

81'S El., Street 
!lanchester 03101 

Nashua 
Nashua Regional Planning Commission 
115 Main Street 

Nashua 03060 
Jurisdiction 
Manchester City TOVna 
Auburn Bedford 
Candia Cheater Deerfield Derry Goffstown Hooksett LondondeJ:rY. 
New Boston Raymond 


weare 
Nashua City Towns 
Amherst 
Brookline Hollis Hudson Litchfield Lyndeborouqh Mason Merrimack Milford Mount vernon Pelham Wilton Hew Huopahixe, cont•d 
Clearinghouae 

AREAWIDE CLBIUIINGBOtJIIBS (Other) 
Lakes Region Pla.nninq C,_ieeion 
-302 Jlluoieton BuildinqMeredith 03253 
Upper Valley-Lake sunapee Council 
314 National Bank Building on-the-Mall Lebanon 03766 


2 "tt 
Jurisdiction 
s 
t-:1
,_. 
Laconia City = 
I Towns ,j:o.. Al8llandria Alton 
Andover 
Barnstead 
Bel110nt 
Bridgewater 
Brietol 
Brookfield 
CeDter Harbor 
Danbury 
Effinqha• 
Franklin 
PreedCII 
Gilford 

Gilaanton 
Hebron 
Hill 
HoldeDless 
Laconia 
Meredith 
·Moultonboro 
New Hampton 
Northfield 
ossipee 

Sanbornton 
sandwich 
TUIWort.h 
'.Tilton 
iluftonboro 
wakefield Wolfeboro z 
0 
New Hampshire portion: -t Towns 
n
Ackworth 
m
Canaan en Charleston Claremont Cornish CroydonDorchester 
Enfield 
Grafton 
Grantham 
Goshen 
Hanover 
Lanqdon 
Lebanon 
Lempster 

pyme 
Newbury 
New London 
Newport 
Oranqe 
oxford 
Plainfield 
Sunapee 
Sutton 
Unity 
Washington 
WilJAOt 

yermont Portion: !2!!!!!! Hartford Norwich Thetford 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, -MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

New Hampshire, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 
Southern Regional Planning Canmission Q 0 Meehani c st.reet Jlteene 03431 
central New Hampshire Planninq COmmission 10.Grand View Road 
Bow 03301 
1-<j 
t-' t-' Jurisdiction 
Jteene city I2!!!l! 
Antrim Dennington Chesterfield Dublin 
Fitzwilliam Francestown 
Gileeun Greenfield Greenville 
Harrisville Hancock 
Hinsdale Hillsborough Jaffrey kar!borough Marlow Mason 
Nelson 
New Ipswich 
Peterborouqh Richmond Rindge Roxbury Sharon Stoddard Sullivan Surry Temple Troy walpole westmoreland Winchester Windsor 
Concord City Towns Allenstown 
Boscawen 
Bow 
Bradford 
Canterbury 
Chichester 
DUnbarton 
Epsom 
Henniker 
Hopkinton 
LOudon 
Northwood 
Pembroke 
Pittsfield 
Salisbury 
Warner 
Webster 
eampsn1re, cont•d 3 Clearinqhouee 
Strafford Rockingham Regional Council 3 Water Stree~ Eo<eter 03833 
North Country Council, Inc. 
P.O. Box 40 Franconia • 03580 
Jurisdiction 
Cities 
Dover POrtsmouth Rochester Somerset Towns Atkinson Barrington Brentwood Danville DUrham East Kingston Epping Exeter Farmington Premont Greenland Hampstead Hampton 111lmpton Falls Hewinqton Rensinqton Kingston Lee Madbury Middleton Milton Newcastle New Durham Newfields Newmarket Newton North Hampton Nottinqham Plaistow Rye Rollinsford Salem Sandown Seabrook Strafford Stratham Windham 
Counties 
~ 
Carro\1 (partl Towns Albany Bartlett Chathlllll Conway Baton Bale1 s LOcation Jackson Madison 
Grafton, except 
Towns 
Alexandria 
Bridqewater 
Bristol 
Canaan 
Dorchester 
Enfield 
Grafton 
Hanover 
Hebron 
Holderness 

Lebanon 
lyme 
Orange 
Oxford 

z 
0
.... 
n 
m 
"' 
;"Cl 
~ 
..... 
c:> FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 ~ 

1-J:j OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BDDGET CIRCUlAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
STATE, METROPOLITAN. AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES ""0 

RHODE ISLAND
1-' 
N 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Rhode Island statewide Planning Program Department of Administration 
Room 201 
265 Melrose Street 
Providence 02907 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Providence 
Rhode Island Statewide Planning Program Depa rt.m.en t of Adllli. nistration 
Room 201 
265 Melrose Street 
Providence 02907 
a 

~ 
'""' 
= 
I 
.... 
Jurisdiction 
z 
0 
.... 
n 
m 
en 
FEDEIAl REGiml, VOL 42, ilt6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCUlAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
STATE. METROPOLITAN. AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 

Vermont. cont•d 
•
Clearinghouse Jur.iadiction VERMONT 
Benninqt.on county Regional 
.I2!!M
Planning and Development Commission Arlington STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Benninqton
P.O. Box 3Q2 Arlinqton 05250 Dorset 
Glast:enbury 
The State Clearinghouse 

Landqrove 
state Plannihq Office 

Manchester 
Peru 
Montpelier 05602 Pownal 

Pavilion Office Buildinq 
Rupert Sandgate 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Shaftsbury (Metropolitan) Stamford 
Sunderland woodford (No metropolitan areas) 
Central vermont Regional Barre CityPlanninq COmmission 
!2!!!!.!

Berlin ToWn Municipal Office Barre
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
RFD Q 
Berlin

(other) Montpelier 05602 cabot 
Calais 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction 

Duxbury 

East Montpelier 
Addison county Regional Planning Towns Fayston 
and Development Commission Addison 

Marshfield 
Battel Block Bridport 

Middlesex 
Middlebury 05753 Bristol 

Montpelier Cornwall 
Moretown Ferrisburg Northfield Goshen 
Orange Leicester 
Plainfield 

Lincoln Roxbury Middlebury Waitsfield Monkton 
warren 

Washington z Orwell waterbury 0
New Haven 
Williamstown ...


Panton 

Ripton woodbury n Salisbury m
worcester 


shoreham 

Chittenden county Regional Cities
starksboro "' 
Planning COmmission· Burlington

Vergennes 

P.o. Box 108 Winooski
Waltham 

58 Pearl Street
weybridqe Towns 
Essex Junction 05452
Whitinq Bolton 
Duels Core 
Charlotte 
Colchester Essex 
Binesbury 
Huntington 
Jericho 
Milton 
Richmond 
Shelbllrne 
SOuth Burlington St. George 
Unc!erhill 
west.ford 
Williston 

Franklin-Grand Isle Reqional St0 Albans City
Planninq and Development Commission Towns 
118 N. Main Street AlburySt. Albans 05G78 Bakersfield 
Berkshire 
Enosburq 
Fairfax 
Fairfield Fletcher

t"Jj "'0
Frankliri 
Georqia 

s
Grand Isle 
Hiqhqate

t-' b:l 
w ...... 
Q 
...I 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 


~ Veraont. cont•d Vermont. cont•d 
"C 
a 
~ 
...... 
= 
•I
/ 
• 

z 
g 
;:; 
m 
tit 
Clearinahouse 
i-' 
.p. 
Lamoille county Development 
council Box 577 Morrisville 05661 
Northeastern Vermont Development Association 
P.O. Box 640 st. Johnsbury 05819 
Jurisdiction 
Isle La Motte 
Montgomery 
North Hero 
Richford 
St. Albans 
Sheldon 
south Hero 
swanton 

Towns 
Belvidere 
Cambridge 
Eden 
Elmore 
Hyde Park 
Johnson 
Morristown 
Stowe 
Waterville 
Walcot 

Caledonia County (part) : 
!!!!!!!!! 
Barnet 
Burke 
Danville 
Groton 
Hardwick 
Kirby 
Lyndon 
Revark 
Peacham 
Ryegate 
st. Johnsbury 
Sheffield 
Stannard 
sutton 
Walden 
waterford 
Wheelock 

Essex COunty (part) : Towns Averill Averys Gore Bloomfield Brighton Brunswick Canaan Concord 
East Haven 
Ferdinand 
Granby 
Guildhall 
Lelllington 
Lunenburq 
Maidstone 
LeVis 
Horton 
Victory 
warners Grant 
Warrens Gore 

Orleans county (part) : N-port City 
!!!!!!!!! 
Albany 
"Barton 
Browninqton 
Charlestown 
coventry 
craftsbury 
Derby 
Glover 
Greensboro 
Bolland 
Iraabury 

Clearinghouse 
Ottauquecbee Regional Planninq 
and Development Commission 
3 central street 
WOOdstock 05091 

Rutland Regional Planning 
Qnlmi.ssion 
27 center street 
RUtland 05701 

southern Windsor County Reqional 
Planninq commission COmmunity Center Room 18 Sprinqfield 05156 
TWo Rivera Reqional Planninq 
and Develop.ent COmmission Box 127 llasonic Ball Sharon 05065 
Jurisdiction 
Jay 
Lovell 
Lorgan 
Newport 
Troy 
Westfield 
westmore 

Towns Barnard Bridgewater Hartland Plymouth Woodstock 
Rutland City Towns 
Benson 
Brandon 
Castleton 
Chittenden 
Clarendon 
Danby 
Fairhaven 
RUbbardton 
Ira 

Mendon 
Middletown Mount Holly Mount Tabor Pawlet Pittsford Poultney Proctor RUtland Sherburne Shrewsbury Sudbury Timmouth Wallinqford Wells west Haven West Rutland 
Towns 
Andover 
Balti..are 

Cavendish 
Chester Ludlow Readinq Sprinqfield weathersfield West Windsor Windaar 
l:!!!m!! 
Betbel 
BraIIford 
Braintree 

Brookfield Chelsea corinth Pairlee Granville 
Hancock 
Newbury Pittsfield P011fret Randolph Rochester Royalton Sharon Stockbridqe Strafford 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
• 

Ver.ont. eont•d 

ClMri.ftqlloUB 
Upper Val.ley-L&ke SUnapee Council 
31' National. Bank Baildinq on-the-111111 Lebanon. New Ba.pshire 03766 

• 

Windhaa Reqional. Pl.anninq 
ancl uevel.op-co..taaion 
139 Main street 
&rattl.eboro 05301 


t'%j 
t-' V1 
• 

'ropah• 
Tunbridqe 
vershire 




west:. Fairlea 
Ver110nt portion: 
'l'ooms 
Hartford 
NOrwich 
TheUord 

New Hampshire portion: 
~ 
Ackworth 
Canaan 
Charl.eston 
Cl.ar_,t 
Cornillh 
croydon 
Dorchester 
Bnfield 
Grafton 
Granthaa 
Goaben 

Hanover 
Lanqdan 
Lebanon 
L-ter 

L~ 
....bury 
Mew London 
Bewport 


orange 
bford 
Pl.ainafielcl 
sunapee 
Sutton 

z 
Unity 
washift\JtOn 
2 
wu..t n Tooma 
m 
Athena 
Brattl.eboro 
Brookline 
DoVer 
Dwuoeraton 
Grafton 
Guil.forcl 
Halifax 
J-aica 
LOndonderry 
Marlboro 

Bewfane 
Putney 
Readeboro 
Rockinqhaa 
searaburq 
-ereet 
stratton 
TOIInBbencl 

VerftOn 
wardeboro 
weeton 
weatlllinieter 
Whitinqhaa 
Wilainqton 
Windhu 
Winhall 

5 
Jurisdiction 
; 
11:1 
....... FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO.. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 = 
•I 

Pam 210-4 
NOTICES 
• 

0
-

>
c( 
"' 
;::) 
z 
c(
... 
cS 
>' ,;
... 
Iii 
!! 
"' 
~ 
... 
0
...
... 
~ 
5
.. 8 ... 
I .ac ~ ..." 
.. .. 
.." ~ 2 ~ 
E
I I ! > 
F -16 
• 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVJ:SEDI 2
New Jersey. cont'd

STATE. METROPOLITAN. AND REG~ONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
Clearinghouse 
Jurisdictic.nNEW JERSElt' 
Vineland{Milville/Bridgeton 
Cumberland County Planning Board
800 commerce Street
Bridgeton 083 0 2 
Bureau of state and Regional Planning 

STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 	Cumberland County 
Department of CoMmunity Affairs Wilmington. Del./N.J,/Md.
329 west State Street

P.O. Box 2768 Wilmington Metropolitan Area Planning Delaware portion:
Trenton 08625 and coordinating council (WLLMAPCO) 

New Cast~e County
2062 New Castle Avenue 
New Jersey portion:
Cross Roads Shopping Center salem countyAREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES New Castle. Delaware 19720 Maryland portion:(MetropolitanI Cecil County 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction AREAWWECLEARIOOHOOSES
(Otberl

Bridgeport. Conn. 1 New Jersey eortion:
Jersey City. N.J., 

~
Meriden. conn•• Bergen cape May County Planning Board Cape May County
New Haven. conn•• Essex County court House
New lt'ork. N.lt' •• Hudson Cape May 0821 0 
Newark. N.J•• Middlesex 

Bunteidon County Planning Board
Norwalk. Conn •• Morunouth 	Hunterdon county
faterson/Cli.fton/Passaic, N.J•• Morris Administrative Building
stamford. cc.nn•• Passaic
wate'rbury. conn•• soaaerset ~~i~~~:t o8822
Danbury. Cooo •• Union
connecticut ~tion: ocean Cow.ty Planning Board Ocean CoWlty
Tri-State Regional Planning Commission All areas within the Court Bouse Square
1 world Trade Center. 82nd Floor f-ollowing State-defined 

Toaa River 08753 
New York. New York 100t18 planning districts:
central Naugatuck Valley Office of the County Planning Director sussex County
Greater Bridgeport Sussex county Planning Board

P.O. Box 69
Housatonic Valley 
Newton 07860
south central 	z
southwesternNew York portion: Warren County
Warren COunty Planning Board 
2
New York City 	234 William Street ;::;Alpba 08866
counties mDutchess
Nassau 	"'
Orange
Putaan
Rockland
Suffolk.

westchester 
Atlant;ic City 
Atlantic County Planninq Board Atlantic County
25 Doiphin AVenue
Nortbfield 08225 

Philadelphia. Pa./N.J. and Trenton 
Delaware Valley Regional Pennsylvania portion:
Planning commission 

~
Penn Towers Building. Third Floor sucks
1819 Jobn F. Kennedy Boulevard Chester
Philadelpbia. Pennsy~vania 19103 Delaware
Montgomery
Pbiladelphia
New Jersey portion:

~
t"%j 	BurlingtoncaadenGloucesterMercer
.....
....... 

; 
~ 
=.... 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 	I
""' 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 2 
srATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 

New York. cant1 d 'i::l 
l'%j 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction 
NEW YORK 
1-' 
00 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
State Clearinqbouse 
NeW York State Division 

of the Budget 
state Capitol 
A1bany 12224 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Bridgeport. Conn•• 
Jersey City. N.J•• 
Meriden. Corm•• 

Newark. N.J.. 
New Haven. Conn•• New York. N.Y•• 
Nopa!k. Conn•• 
Patersop/Clifton/Passaic. N.J•• 
Staeford. Conn•• 
Waterbury. conn•• and 
ganbury. Cooo. 

Tri-State Regional Planning Commission 1 World Trade Center. 82nd Ploor New York 01148 
AJbany/Scbenectady/Troy 
Capital District Regional 
Planning Co-.issioD 
79 North Pearl Street 
Albany 12207 

Binabaptton 
southern Tier East Regiooal 
Planning Board 

BoJ< 1766 
Brooae county Office Building 
Binqbaaton 13902 

~ 
Erie and Niagara Counties 
Regional Planning Board 
Northt"""' Plaza 
3103 Sheridan Drive 
-rst 14226 

Jurisdiction 
New York oortic· New York City CoWlties 
Dutchess 
Nassau 
orange 
Putnam 
Suffolk 
Weatcbester 

New Jersey portion: 
~ 
Bergen 
Essex 
Hudson 

Middlesex 
-.outh 
Morris 
Passaic 
soaerset 
Union 

coonecticut portion: All areas within tbe following state-defined planning districts: Central Naugatuck Valley Greater Bridgeport sauaatonic Valley soutb Central Southwestern 
~ 
Albany 
Rennsselaer 
Saratoga 
schenectady 

coypties 
Broc:xae 
Chenango 
Delaware 
otsego 
Tioga 

TOoapkins 
counties Brie Nia.qara 
Rochester 
Geneseee Finger ·Lakes Regional 
Planning Board Ebenezer Watts Building Q1 s. Fitzbugb Street 
Rochester 1Q6H 
Syracuse 
Central New York Regional Planning 
and Development Board Midtown Plaza 700 East Water Street Syracuse 13210 
Utica/Rome 
Herk~er-oneida Joint Planning Board BOO Park Avenue Utica 13501 
AREAW:tDE CLEARl:NGliOUSES (Otber) 
I~ke Champlain-Lake George 
Regional Planning Board Lake George Institute Lake George 12845 
Southern Tier Central Regional 
Planning Board 53-1/2 Bridge Street Corning 14830 
southern Tier west Regional 
Planning Board 2~ Broad street SalaJIIanca 1H79 
Black River-st. Lawrence 
Regional Planning Board Payson Hall st. Lawrence University canton 136 11 counties Genesee Livingston 
Monroe 
Ontario Orleans seneca Wayne 
Yates 
~ 
Cayuga cortland 
Madison onondaga oswego 
counties 
Herkimer 
oneida. 
Counties 
CIIiitOil 
Essex 
Haailton 
Warren 
washington 
Counties Steuben Chenung Schuyler 
counties Allegany Cattaraugus Chautauqua 
counties 
PUiikTiii 
Jefferson Lewis St. Lawrence 
~ ~ 
= 

,j:o. 
z 
0 
::! 
n 
m 
en 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, 
OFFICII OP IIIUIAGIIIIEirl' A11D IIUDGBl' CIRCULAII II). A-ts (aBVl811D) BrA'l'E• llll'l'ROPOLITAII. AIID IUIGIOICAL CLBIU'IIMIJ098BS 
POIRT9 a:ta? 
S'l'A'l'll CIJIAIIIIIGIIOUSB 
Planning Board 
P.O. Box ~1119 Minillaa Station Santuree 00940 
l/DGIII I&WpS 
BrATS CLIIARIIIGIIOUSE 
Office of Community Services Office of the ~erncr 
P.O. bOx 5138 St. Thomas 00801 
'"<:! 
1-' \0 
• 

RIGIOI .UI 
Delaware Di•trict of Columbia Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia 
z 
g 
n 
m 
"' 
; 

~ 
.... 
•I
= 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
"%j OFFICE OF MNAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE. METROPOLITAN,. AND REG.IONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
tv 
~ 
0 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Delaware State Planning Office 
Thaaas COllins Buildinq 
530 South Dupont Highway 
Dover 19901 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearjpqhouse Jurisdiction 
Wileipqtog. Del./N.J./Md. 
Wilaiogton Metropolitan Area Planning Delaware portion: 
and Coordinatinq CoUDcil (WILIIAPCO) New Castle COWlty 2062 New Castle Avenue New Jersey portion: ezoss Roads Shopping center 5altS County Mew castle 19720 Maryland portion: 
Cecil county 
OFFICE OF MNAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
'"C 
STATE,. METROPOLITAN,. AND REGIONAL CLFARINGHOUSES 
Ill 
B 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 
t-:1 
.... 
Q
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
I 
~ 
Division of Budget and Management systems District Buildinq. ROOD 423 1350 E Street. N.W. washingtoa ~0004 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Metropolitan) 

Cleaci.oghouse Jurisdiction 
washington. o.c./Hd./Va. 
Metropolitan Washington council of District of columbia (iovernments Maryland portion: 1225 Connecticut Avenue,. N.w. counties Washington 20036 Montgomery Prince Georges 
Virginia portion: Cities Alexandria Fairfall: Falls Church 
~ 
Arlington Fairfax 
LoudoWl 
Prince William 
z 
0
.... 
n 
m 
Cft 
•

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, ,-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
1-:r:j 
N t-' 
01'1'1CB OJ' IIIUIIIGIIIIBifJ: A1Ul BUDGIJ:!: CDICULAR 1110. A-95 (RBVJBIIDI BrATZ. IIBTROl'QLJ:TAII• AIID amiORAL CLIIAIIXIIIOBOUBU 
.IIII!Do6llll 
STATII CLIIAIIJ:ICBOUSB 
Department of State Planning 301 Neat Pr-Street Baltt.Gre Z1Z03 
ARBAIIUIII CLIIAIIXIIGBOUSIIS· 
(lletropolitao) 
clearingbouM 
ptl.t;iegre 
Regional PlaoniAg council Mt. Vernon Medical Bllil41ri9 701 st. Paul Street 
Balti.ore Z1202 
Ho!b.J.oatpp.. D.C.I'ft4.tya. 
Metropolitan Washington·Council 
of Govern.ent• 
1225 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington. D.C. 20036 
!UlaJ.AAton. Del./N.J./Md. 
Milaington Metropolitan Area Planning 
and eoorcliAating council (WILMAPCO) 
2062 New Castle Avenue 
cross Roada Shopping Center 
New Castle, Delaware 19720 
Jgiediqtion 
Balti110re City 
~ 
Anne Arundel 
Baltiloore 

cara:ou 
Herford 
-ard 


District of Columbia l!arYland porU99: 
~ 

-.tgODery PriAce Georges Virginia portion: 
~ 
Alexandria 
Fairfax 
Palla Church 

~-
AilliigtOn 
ll'airfax 
Loundon 
Prince Williaa 


Delaware portion: New Castle County New Jersey portion: Saleaa County 
Maryland portion: 
Cecil County 
Jydadicdop 
~ 
Lehiqb 
North&llpton 

Blair County 
Brie County 

g 
n 
~ 
CUIIII>erland 

= 
Dauphin 
Perry 

Caoabria County 
Lancaster county 

Pennsylvania portiqn: 
COW>ties 
Bucks 
Cheater 
Delaware 
Montgomery 
Pbiladelpbia 

New Jersey portion:
CDUQ't.ies .._ 
Burlington 
CaDden 
G'-ouceater 

Mercer 

; 
1:1:1 
.... 
= 
OJ'J'XCB OJ' IIIUUIIDimlfr AIID, BODGift CDCUI.Aa 1110, A-15 (a&VISJIDI 
BrATZ. IIBTROJOLJ:TAII. UD UGJ:ORAL CLDRDIQIIDU8B8 

PIIII'ISV.JA!W, 
ftATB CLBAAIIIGBOUU 
PeADaylvania State CleariAgbouae GoVemor•a Budget Office J:Dtargover-tal Relatione Divieion 
P.o. soa un 
Barriaburg 17120 

AIIBAWJ:DB CLIIARJ:IIGBOUSIIS (lletropolitaDI 
C1MringhqUM 
~lentOWQ-Bethlehea 
JoiAt Planning COmaiaaion Lehigb-No~•pton Countiea Teroinal Building, ABB Airport 
P.O. Box 3087 Lehigh Valley 18103 
~ 
Blair COunty Planning ccamiaaion Highland Hall Annex 
court House 
Bollidayaburg 166•8 
AU!. 
Erie Metropolitan Planning CODaiaeion 606 w. second Street Erie 16507 
garrisburg 
Tri-County Regional Plannl.n., 
COIUDisaiOD 
2001 N. ll'ront Street 
Harrisburg 17102 

Johnstown 
CAMbria County Planning Commission 
Court Bouse 
Ebensburg 15931 
Lancaster 
Lancaster County Planning Commission 
900 East King Street 
Lancaster 17602 

PhJ,ladelpbia. Pa,,N,J. and Trenton 
Delaware Valley Reqianal Planninq 
COIIUIIiaaion 
Penn Towers Building, Third ll'loor 
1819 John II'. Kennedy Boulevard 
Philadelphia 19103 


FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
~ 

l 
I'Zj 
N 
N 

Pennaylv&aia. coot'd 
C1Miinghoyte 
Pitttburgb 
SoutbweateED PeoDBylv&aia Regiaaal 
PlaJUli.Dg ColaisaioD 
564 Fcnhee Aveoue 
Pitteburqb 15219 
JIHlU.ng 
l!erka County 'Planniog COIUiieaioia 
Court House 
ReadiDg 19601 
~ 
Lackawanna COunty Pl4DIIiog CCIUiieaioo County AdaiDistratioo BRildiog 200 Adaaa Aveoue SCr&atOD 18503 
Hi1k••-Barre(Ba•eltop 
Luaeroe County Pl&DDiDg CO..Uaioo 
Court. Bouse 
Wilkes-Barre 18711 
.llW! 
York County Planning Caa.ieeioo 
220 s. Dulte Street · 
York 17403 

AREAIUDI! CLEAR.IIIGHOOSBS 
(ot.berJ 
l!cono•ic Development council of 
NOrtheast Pennsylvania 
P.o. aox 777 Avoca 186U 
Southern Allegbanies Planning and 
Develo~nt Commission 
1506 11th Avenue 
Altoona 16602 
IIOrtbern Tier Regional PlanniDg 
and DeVelopment coa.isaion 
507 MaiD street Towanda 18848 
Northwest Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development commission 
406 Biery Building PrankliD 16323 Juri!diCUC!! 
~ 
.Uleg-y 
~tronq 

Beaver 
Butler 
waebiogton 
ilest.oreland 
Berke county 
Lackawanna county 
Luaerne county 
York county 
Co!!Dties 
carbon 
Lackawanna• Luzerne• 
-.roe Pike SCbulylkill wayne 
cou.nties 
DeFord 
Blair• Caebria• Fulton Huntingdon 
SOllerset 
Counties 
Bradford 
Sullivan 
Susquebana 
Tioga 
Wyoaing 
Counties Clarion 
crawford 
Erie• Poreat Lawrence 
Mercer Venanqo warren · 

Penasyiv~ia. oont.'d 
gevi.pghguae Juriedicti!!! = 
B 
Borth caitral Pennsylvania 
~ 
~
Econoaic Develo~at District ca~~eran 
....
212 Main street Clearfield 
Box 377 Blk = 
I
Ridgway 15853 Jeffereoo 
Ncltean 
"'" 
PotteE 
•Tbe counties followed by asteEisks are witbiD a •etropolitan areawide 
clearinqbouae jarisdlctioo. Rotifica~~C'lOS froa the11e COWlties should 
therefore be sent to botb clearingbouaes. 
z 2 
;:; 
c: 
• 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO.. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
• 



OJTIC.II OP lllt.NAGI!MZIIT AIID BUDGB'l' CIRCOLAII 110. A-95 (RI!VlSI!DJ 2 STATII, IIE'l'ROPOLZTAII, AIID RIIGIOIIAL CL.IIAIII!IGBOUSES virqinia, cont•d
• 
~ 
STAT.II CLEARINGBDU&.II 
Depar~t of Int:erqovern.ental Affaire Division of state-rederal RelAtione rooartb strea Office lluildinq 205 Nortb .roartb Strlli-23219 
AliL\11IDII CLMRINGBOUSIIS (Metropolitan) 
SjlMrlpahpW 
Lypfh'Nrq 
o.Dtrel ¥ir9iaia Planninq District 
co..tedoa 2511 ~ial AY•ue, Suite 301 Lync:bburq 2U01 
MnOrt l!e!!a(M&t;PP 
Penin.ula Pl&nninq District co.a18eion 2017 Clmninqb-Drive, Suite 203 8Uipton 2.J666 
llp#oWJ!orSwpgtb 
SOOtbeaiOtera Virginia Plaaaiaq 
Dietrict oo-iaeiOD 
16 Jtoqer Baecutive C•ter 
IIOrfol.k 23502 

''t«!Wra 
Crater Plaaaiag District Co..teeion 
P.O. 80z 1S08 
2825 s. Crater Road 
Peteraburg 23803 


t'%j 
N 
w 
ol!!£i•4iction 
ill!!!! 
Bedford Lyncllbw:g 
~ 
-ret 
~toa 
Bedford c-pbell 
~ 
a-p~oon 
a-port lien Willi-bolrq counties


J-• City
York 
illH! 
ch..apeake 
Franklin 
Norfol.k rort.-tb Buffol.k Virginia Beacb 
~t•wiqllt. 
-t.buptool 
~ 
l!llpod.a
IIO_.u 
Peterebolrg 
l:2l!!!!J.!! 
Dinwiddie 
Greeneville 
Prince George 
8U8Hll 
IIUI<ry 
C1earinabou.se 
~ 
llicbo!ond Reqional Planninq Difltrict 
coeu~ieaion 
6 Nortb Sixtb street, Suite 500 Ricbooond 2.J2 19 
JWoWIU Piftll Pl&aDing Difltrict cc.aJ.esion 
P.o. aoz 2527. cryetd Towers BUildiaq IIOanoke 211010 
lfl!!hinaton• D.c.fM4.,Ya1 
Jletropolitan 11a!!hiaqton Council 
of GoVerD~~e~~t.e 
1225 connecticut Avenue, N.N. 

11a!!hiaqton, D.C. 200.J6 

A&IIAWID.II CLEAIUNGBOUS.IIS (Otber) 
L&NOWISOD Pl&nninq District CO.aiaeion (PDCI 
u.s. 58-1121 w DuUield 21121111 
c-llerland Plateau PIX: 
P.o. Boa 5118 Lebanon 211266 
Mount l!Oqers POC 
5'4 &. Min street 111111 Buildiaq Mrion 2113511 
Jur1!4ict1on 
• 

~ 
Cllarles City 
Chesterfield 
Goochland 

Hanover 
&enrico 
llew K•t 
PoWIIat.an 
Richlooncl City 
~ 
Alleghany
Botetourt 
craig 

IIOanoke 
~on Forge 
COVington 
aoenoJie. 
Sal• 


Dietrict of Coluabia 
Maryland portion: C0!!9tiee IIDntqc.ery Prince Georqee 
Vi(giaia portion: Cities Aleaandria 
P&irfu 
Falls Church 

g
Countiee 
Arlinqton n 
Pairfaa 

Loundoun 

= 
Prince Williaa 
~ 
Lee 
scott 
Wise 
ltOrtoa City 
~ 
Buchanan 
Dickeneoa 
RUIIeel 
'l'u-ell 

~ 
Bland 
Carroll 
Gray
SIIytb 

waebiaqtoa 
lrytlle 
~ 
Bria~ol 

Gala 
; 

~ 
.... 
= 
•I

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONOAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 



43 
Virginia, cont•d
Virginia~ cant•d C1earJ.nghoyoe J!!ri!dic;t;ionClearinshouse Judadiqtion Northern Virginia PDC ~
·NeW River Valley PDC ~ 7309 Arlington Boulevard Arlington1612 Wadsworth Avenue Floyd Falla Church 22042 FairfaxRadford 24141 Giles Loudon
MOntgomery Prince WilliaaPulaski 
~
Radford City Areiiiiidria
Falla Church
Central Shenandoah PDC COUlltie& Fairfax City
l'.O. Box 1337 Auguetil Manassas
119 w. Frederick Street Bath Manassas Park
Staunton 24401 Highland

Rockbridge 
'l'llomaa Jeffereon PDC 	~
Rockinqhalll 	Al~le
70 1 Eaat ltiqh Street~ Charlottesville 22901 Fluvanna
Buena Vista 	Greene
llarriaonburq LouieaLexinqton 
••leonStau.ntc:.a Charlottesville , 'ty
Waynesboro 
Middle Peninaula PDC 	~
Southside PDC 	Cougtiea P.O. Box 286 Beau
P.o. Box 660 Brunswick saluda 231_, Gloucester
123 south Hecklenburg Avenue Halifax Jtinq and Queea

south Hill 23970 Mecklenburg &ing Willi
south Boston City llatheWa
Kiddl-x
RADCO PDC ~

913 Charles Street Caroline 
Fredericksburg 22401 Jt.ing George

SpotsylvaniaStaffordPrederickaburq City 
llorthern Meek PDC 	~
Poet Office Drawer H Lancaster 
Callao 22U5 Morthlllll>erland
RiCbllond
11eat110reland 

Accomack-Morthaapton PDC 	~
ACCOIIaCk
-316
Accoaack 23301 	NOrthampton. 
Piedolont PDC 	counties
Aaelia · 
205 M. VirginiA Street Buckinqhaa 
Farmville 23901 Charlotte 

P.O. Box P 
cuaberi.andLUnenburgllottowayPrince Edward 
lleat Pi-nt PDC 	~
P.O. Box 1191 Franklin 
18-22 llalnut Street Henry 
Martinsville 24112 Patrick

Pittsyvania 
Lord Fairfax PDC ~
103 zaat Sixth Street Clarke 

Front Royal 22630 	Frederick
Page
Shenandoah

warren 
Rappahannock-Rapidan PDC 	counties 
702 s. IIAin Street Culpeper 
CUlpeper 22701 Fauquier

Madison
Orange
Rappahannock 
• 
FEDRAL UGOSTU, VOL. 42,.DAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

.,

a 
~
=.... 
I
~ 
gz 
;:;m 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCUlAR NO. A-95 (REVISED)STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
WEST VIRGINJ:A 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Grant Information Department
Office of Federal State Relations Room w-140 State capitol Buildinq 
Cbarleaton 25305 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Cleuioghouee 
Cb.yltSt:ql 
BCKP Reqional Interqovemmental Council 410 Kanawha Boulevar4 East Charleat:on 25301 
Buntinqton/Aahlapd. w. Va./Ky./Ohio 
KYOVA In~eratate Planning Co.mission 
P.O. Box 939 
1221 Sixth Avenue 
BUntinqton 25701 

Steubenville(Weirton. Ohio/W. Va. 
Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson (BHJ) 
Metropolitan Planning Co..ission 814 Adams Street Steubenville. Ohio 43952 
Wheeling. w. va./Ohio 
Bel-o-Mar Interstate Planning
Colftllission 

P.o. Box 2086 
2177 National Road 
Wheelinq 26003 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Region I Planning and 
DevelopMent Council 
201 Bair Buildinq 
Beckley 2 580 1 

t:Ij 
N 
1..11 
Jurisdiction 
~ 
Boone 
Clay 

Kanawha 
Put.nail 
West Virginia portion: Counties Cabell Wayne 
kentucky portion: Boyd county Ohio portion: 
Law.rence County 
West Virginia portion: counties 
iir'OOke 
Hancock 
Ohio portion: Jefferson county 
west Virginia portion: counties Marshall Ohio 
Obio portion: BelJtOnt COunty 
Counties 
Mercer 
McDowell 
Monroe 
Raleigh 

SWIUDer& 
lfYOlllinq 
West Virginia., cont• d 
Cl.earinghouse 
Reqion II Planninq and 
Development council 
Cabell County Court House -Room 305 
Huntinqton 25701 

Reqion IV Planninq and 
Development council 
Box 505 
s ....... rville 26651 

Reqion V Planninq and 
oevelo~ent Council 
217 Fourth Street 
Parkeraburq 26101 
Region VI Planning ·and 
Develo~ent Council 
20 1 Deveny BuilMnq 
Fairmont 26554 

Region VII Planning and 
Development Council 

Upshur County court House 
Buckhannon 26201 
Region VIII Planning and 
Develo~ent Council 1 Virginia Avenue Petersburg 26847 
Region IX Planning and Development Council 121 West Kinq Street Martinsburq 25QO 1 
Reqion X Plaaninq and Development Council 2177 National Road 
P.O. Box 2086 Wheelinq 26003 
•counties followed by an ast.erisk arE' within a 
clearinghouse jurisdict:ion also. Therefore, notification from these.coi.Wlties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 
; 

2 
• 
Jurisdictioo 
Counties 
Cabell• 
Lincoln 
Loqan 
Mason 
Mingo 
Wayne• 
~ 
Fayette 
Greenbrier 
Nicbolaa 
Pocahontas 
Webster 
~ 
Calhoun 
Jackson 
PJ.easanta 
Ritchie 
Roane 
Tyler 
Wirt
-
~ 
Dod4ridqe 
Harrison 
Marion 
Mononqahela 
Preston 
Taylor 

counties Barbour Braxton z Gilmer 
g
Levis 
RandolP, 
n
Tucker m 
Upshur 
"' 
counties Grant Hampshire Hardy Mineral Pendleton 
counties Berkeley Jefferson Morgan 
CoWJties Marshall* 
Ohi~ 
Wetzel 
•etropolitan areawide 
Nl 
..... 
Q 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
oj:o. 
tTj "tl
s
!'..) ~
0'\ .....
=I
~ 
R E G I 0 N IV 
Alabama 
Florida 
Georgia 
Kentucky 
Mississippi 
North Carolina 
south carolina 
Tennessee 

0
...n z 
m 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
~ 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Alabama Development Office 
State Office Buildinq 
Montqomery 36104 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinahouse 
Bintinqhf!ft 
Birmingham Reqional Planning ComMission SUite 220 2112 -Eleventh Avenue, south 21 Office Plaza south Birainqhaa 35205 
Columbus. Ga. /Ala. 
Lower Chattahoochee Valley APOC 
P.O. Box 1908 
Collllllbus, Georqia 31902 

Gadsden 
East Alabama Regional Planning and Development ca..ission 
P.O. Box 2186 
100 Quintard Avenue 

Anniston 16201 
Huntsville 
TOp of Alabama Regional CQuncil 
of Governments 
350 central Bank Building 
Huntsville 35801 

MObile 
south Alabama Regional Planning"':! COmmission · 
P.O. Box 1665 
250 N. Water Street 
Mobile 36601 

N ....... 
OFFICE OF MNAGEMEift' AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
STAT!!, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES A.labaaa, cont•d 

Jurisdiction 
Counties 
Elmore 
Montganery 
Autanqa 

·Counties 
~ 
Payette 
Bale 
Tuscaloosa 
Pickens 
Greene 
Lamar 

counties 
Choctaw 
Monroe 
Clarke 
Perry 
Conecun 
Washington 
Dallas 
Wilcox 
Marengo 
sumter 

z 
Counties 0 colbert 
::::! 
Franklin 

n 
Lauderdale 
Winston 

c: 
Marton 
Counties 
Cullman 
Lawrence 
Morgan 
Counties 
Barbour 
Henry 
Coffee 
1Jouston 
Covington 
Dale 
Geneva 
~ 
Bullock 
Butler 
Crenshaw 
Lowndes 
Macon 
Pike 
counties

r;ee
areawide clearinqhouse jurisdiction. Therefore. notification from these counties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 

a 
within a metropolitan 

"0 
Jurisdiction 
counties 
Chilton 
Jefferson 
Blaunt 
St. Clair 
Shelby 
walker 


Georgia portion: 
~ 
Chattahoochee Clay Harris Muscogee Quitinaw Randolph Stewart Talbot 

Alaballa eortio~: Russell county 
CoWlties 
Calhoun 
Chambers 
Cherokee 
Clay 
Cleburne 
Coosa 
Etowah 
Randolph 
Talladega 
Tallapoosa 

Counties 
Madison 
Limestone 
Jackson 
Marshall 
Dekalb 

Counties Mobile 
Baldwin Escaa,bria Clearinghouee 
Montgomery 
central Alaba~a Regional Planning commission 
P.O. Box 4034 303 washington Avenue Montgoaery 36104 
Tuscaloosa \ 
West Alabama Planning and 
Development Council P.. o. Box 28 TUscaloosa 35401 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Alabama-Tombigbee Rivers Regional Planning and Development Commission 
P.O. Box 269 Court House Camden 36726 
Muscle Shoals Council of Local Governments 
P.O. Box 2603 MUscle Shoals 35660 
North Central Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission 
P. 0. Box 1069 Decatur 35601 
Sogtheast Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission 
P.O. Box 1406 Dothan 36301 
South Central Alabama 
Planning and oevelo~ent Commission 2825 East South Boulevard Montgomery 36111 
Lee county council of Governments 
P.o. Box 1012 • Auburn 36830 
•counties followed by an asterisk a~e also 

~ 
.... 
= 
~
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 


s 
"tl 
·-.;~ OFFICE OF Mlt.NAGEMENT AND BIJDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 'lorida,. cont• dSTATE, IIBTROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
N
;-...) FLQiiiDA FOrt Mvers ~:lO 
=
so~thwest Florida ?lanning Council 	Counties I
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
P.O. Box 981 CiiarlOtte ....2121 West First l;treet Collier 
Fort Myers 33901 Glades
Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations Hendry
Oivt.sion of State Planning Lee
Department of Administration Sarasota ,(except 
660 Apalachee Parkway City of Sarasota)
Tallahassee 3230' 
Lakeland-Winterhaven 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Central Florida Reqional Counties(Metropolitan) 
Planning council 	DeSoto 
P.O. Box 2089 Hardee 
Bartow 33830 Highlands
clearinghouse Jurisdiction Okeechobee
POlk
Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood 
PensacOla

Broward county Area Planning Board Broward 'county 
1600 s. E. 10 Terrace West Florida Regional Counties
Fort Lauderdale 33316 Planninq council Escambia 

P.O. ·Box 486 santa Rosa
Gainesville 106 s. Reus Street Okaloosa 
Pensacola 32 SO 2

North Central Florida Regional 	~
Alachua
Planning Co}lncil 	Tallahassee
IS s.w. second Place 	Bradford
Columbia

Gainesville 32601 	Tallahassee-Leon county Leon county
Dixie 
Planning commission
Gilchrist 
P.o. Box 533
Hamilton 
Tallahassee 32302
-Lafayette 
z
Madison 
Tampa/St. Petersburg
suwannee 
n0...
Taylor 
Tampa Bay Req ional Planning Council CountiesUnion 3151 Third Avenue North Hillsboro11gh m
St. Petersburg 33113 	Manatee
Jacksonville 	Pinellas 
"'
Pasco
Jacksonville Area Planning Board counties Sarasota (part) 
330 East Bay Street Baker City of Sarasota
Jacksonville 32202 Clay

Duval 
West Palm Beach
Flagler
Nassau 
Palm Beach county Area Planninc; 	Palm Beach County
Putnam 
Board
St. Johns 
2 300 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 200
Miami 	West Palm Beach 33409 
Dade County
Metropolitan Dade county
Planninq.Department AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES
702 Justice Building (Other)
1351 N.W. 12th Stre~t
Miami 33125 Northwest Florida Development council Counties 
and Economic Developnent District Bay
Orlando 5321-B West Hiqhway 98 Calhoun 
Panama City 32401 Franklin
East Central Florida Regional Counties Gadsden
Planninq Council Brevard Gulf 
1011 Wymore Road Lake Holmes
Winter Park 32789 Orange Jackson
Osceola Jefferson

Seminole Leon•Volusia LibertywakuelaWaltonwashington 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
n 	• 

• 

•counties followed by an asterisk are aleo in a metropolitan 
clearinqhouse .area. Therefore, notifications involving such counties 
should be sent to both clearinghouses. 

I 
n II 
t'1j 
N "tt 
\0 a 
Florida, cont•d 
C 1 earinghouse 
South Florida Reqional 
Planninq council suite 429 1515 Northwest 167 Street MiaJIIi 33169 
Withlaooochee Regional Planning Council 3500 N.E. Silver Springs Boulevard Ocala 32670 
Treasure Coast Reqional Planning Council 
P.O. Box 2395 
Stuart 3JQ9Q 
Jurisdiction 
counties 
~ 
Dade• Monroe 
Counties Citrus 
Hernando Levy liarion Suater 
counties Indian River 
Martin 
Pala Beach• · st. Lucie 
~ 
.... 
= 
FEDEIAL IEGISTEI, VOL 42, NO. ~ONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
""" 
"<:1 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
w 
Office of Planning and 
Roan 615B 270 washinqton Street, Atlanta 3033Q 
Clearinghouse 
Albany 
Albany-Daugherty county Planning Commission 
GEORGIA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Budget 
s.w. 
AREAWIDE 	CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
P.O. Box 1827 Albany 31702 
Atlanta 
Atlanta Reqional Commission 230 Peachtree Street, N.W. suite 200 Atlanta 30303 
Augusta. Ga./SOuth Carolina 
Metropolitan ~ouncil of Governments of Aiken and Richmond Counties 
121 Marion Avenue East 
North Auqusta, SOuth Carolina 298"1 
chattanooga. Tenn./Georgia 
chattanooga Area Regional council 
of Governments 735 Broad Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37Q02 
COlumbus. Ga. /Alabama 
Lower Chattahoochee Valley APDC 
P.O. Box 1908 
Columbus 31902 

• 

Jurisdiction 
Dougherty County 
Counties 
Clayton 
Cobb 
Dekalb 
Douglas 
Fultin 
Gwinett 
Rockdale 
Georgia portion: Richmond County 
s.c. 	portion: 'Aiken county 
Georgia oortion: 
~:i:!~es 
Catoosa Dade Tennessee portion; 'Hamilton County 
Georgia oortion: 
counties 
Chattahoochee 
Clay 
·Barris 
Muscogee 
QUitlllaU 
Randolph 
Stewart 
Talbot Alabaaa portion: 
RUIII!Iell County 
Georgia, cQnt' d 
clearinghouse 
Macon 
Middle Georgia Are~ Planninq 
Commission 711 Grand Buildinq Macon 31201 
savannah 
Chatham county-Savannah Metropolitan Planning commission 
P.O. Box 1027 savannah 31402 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (other) 
Altamaha Area Planning, and Development commission (APDC) 
P.O. Box 328 Baxley 31513 
central· savannah River APDC 2123 Wriqhtsboro Road 
P.o. Box 2800 Auqusta 30904 
chattahoochee-Flint APDC 
P.o. Box 1363 
LaGranqe 30240 

Coastal APDC 
P.O. Box 1316 
Brunswick 31520 

Jurisdiction 
counties 
~ 
Crawford Houston Jones Monroe 
Peach TWigg 
Chatham County 
counties Appling Bullock candler Evans Jeff Davis Tattnall TOomes wayne 
counties Burke Columbia 
Emanuel Glascock Jefferson Jenkins 
Lincoln McDuffie 
Richmond• 
screven 
Taliaferro Warren 
Wilkes 
Counties carroll coweta Heard Meriwether Troup 
Counties 
Bryan 
Camden Chatham• 
Effingham Glynn Liberty 
Long 
Mcintosh 

'"C 
a 

1...:1
,_. 
= 
~ 
g 

n 
= 

FED~RAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

Georqia, cont 1 d Clearinghouse Coasta~ Plans APOC 
P.O. Box 1223 Valdosta 31601 
coosa Valley APDC 
P.O. Drawer H 3 Broad Street Rome 30161 
Georqi:a Mountains APDC 
P.O. Box 1720 Gainesville 30501 
Heart of Georqia APOC 
P.O. Box 667 Eastman 31023 
Middle Flint APDC 
P.o. Box 6 Ellaville 31806 
Mcintosh Trail APOC 
P.o. Box 241 206 Childers Building Griffin 30223 
>'%j 
Jurisdiction 
Counties 
Beiiliili 
Berrien 
Brooks 
Cook 
Echols 
Irwin 
Lanier 
Lowndes 
Tift 
Turner 
Counties 
Bartow 
catoosa• 
Chatooga 
Dade• 
Ployd 
Gordon 
Haralson 
PAulding 
Polk 
walker• 
counties 
Banks 
Dawson 
Forsyth 
Franklin 
Habersham 
Hall 
Hart 
Lumpkin 
Rabun 
Stephens 
Towns 
Union 
White 
Counties Bleckley Dodge Laurens Montgomery PUlaski Telfair Treut.len Wheeler Wilcox 
Countie-s 
Crisp 
Dool"Y 
Macon 
Marion schley Sumter Taylor Webster 
Counties ilitls-
Fayett~ 
Henry Lamar Newton Pike Spalding 
Upson 
•

Georgia, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
North Georgia APDC 	Counties 
212 N. Pentz Street 	Cherokee 
Dalton 30720 	Fannin 
Gi101er Murray Pickens 
Whitfield 
Northeast Georgia APDC 	Counties 
305 Research Drive 	Barrow 
Athens 30601 	Clarke Elbert Greene Jackson Madison Morqan oconee OCJlt!thorpe Walton 
Oconee APDC 	Counties 
P.O. Box 707 Baldwin 1oq East. Hancock Street Hancock Milledgeville 31061 Jasper 
Johnsen Putnam washington Wilkinson 
Slash Pine APOC 
~ 
Her i taqe Road 	Atkinson 
Waycross 31501 	Bacon Brantley Charlton Clinch Coffee Pierce Ware 
,gz 
Southwest Georgia APOC 	Counties n 
P.o. Box 3q6 	Baker 
Camilla 	31730 Calhoun Colquitt 
= 
Decatur 
Dougherty• 
Early 
Grady 
Lee 
Miller 
Mitchell 
Seminole 
Terrell 
Thomas 
Worth 
•counties followed by an asterisk are within a metropolLtan areawide clearinghouse jurisdiction also. Therefore, notifications from these cbunties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 
; 

~  
VJ  '""' 
.......  =  
I  
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42. NO. 6-rMONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977  ~  

"%j 
GFF!CE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIF!CULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
Rentucky, ~ont•d 	~ 
STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
'JJ KENTUCKY
"' 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Stat€ Clearir.qhouse 
Ofiice for Policy and Management 
2(19 caoitol Annex 
Fra:--,kf(>t-t. 40601 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Jurisdiction
fl~f..!.n.qh-:;use 
~incii:ma!:i, Ohio/l<y. /Jnd. and 
Hamilton/Middletown, OhiQ 

Ohio-Ky.-Ind. (OR!} Ccuncil 	Ohio portion: 
of Governments count.1€s 
476 Ea~t Fourth Street Butler 
Cinci!1nati, Ohio 4~202 Clermont: 

Clinton Hamilton Warren 
Kentucky portion: Co,Jnties 
soone--
Campbell Kenton 
Indiana portion: Counties Dearborn Ohio 
_Evansville, Ind./Ky. 
Scu~hwest.ern Indiana and Kentucky Kent.ucky portion: 
~egional Council of Governments Henderson county Civic ~:er~t.er Complex Indiana portion: F·:ansvi:le. Indiana 47708 Counties 
r.;ibson 
Pike Posey Vanderbutgh Warwick 
Eunt in_otor./Ashland, w. Va./Kv./Ohio 
KYOVA Interstate Planning Conunissi.on West Virginia portion: 
P.O. Box 939 counties 
1221 Sixth Avenue Cabell 
Huntinqton, ~o1est Virqinia 25701 Wayne 

Kentucky 	portion: Boyd county Ohio portion: 
Lawrence county 
Clearinghouse 
Lexington 
Blueqrass Area Development District 120 East Reynolds Road Lexinqton 'tO 503 
Louisyille,· Ry./Ind. 
Kentuckiana Regional Planning and 
Development Agency 505 West Ormsby Avenue Louisville 40203 
)Wensboro 
Green River Area Development District 
P.O. Box 628 220-1/2 Frederica Street Owensboro 42 301 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Other) 
Barren River Area Development District, Inc. 
P.O. Box 154 Bowling Green 42101 
Biq sandy Area Developnent District, Inc. Tourist Information Buildinq Prestonburq &11653 
Jurisdiction 
Counties 
Anderson 
Bourbon 
Boyle 
Clark 
Estill 
Fayette 
Franklin 
Garrard 
Harrison 
Jessamine 
Lincoln 
Madison 
Mercer 
Nichols 
Powell 
Scott 
Woodford 


Kentucky portion: Counties Bullitt Jefferson Henry Oldham Shelby Spencer Trimble 
Indiana portion: Counties Floyd Clark 
Counties 
Daviess 
Hancock 
Henderson 
Mclean 
Ohio 
Union 
Webster 

~ 
Allen 
Barren 
Butler 
Edmondson 
Hart 
Logan 
Metcalfe 
Monroe 
Simpson 
warren 

Counties 
Floyd 
Johnson 
Magoffin 
Martin 
Pike 


a 

~ 
..... 
= 
I 
""" 
z 
0 

'"" n 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
n 


Ken't.u.cky, can't.'d 
Clearinghouse 
Buffalo Trace Ar.ea Developooent 
Die'trict, Inc. 
State National Bank Buildinq 
Maysville 41056 
CUmberland valley Area Development 
Dis'trict., Inc. courthouse London 40741 
Fivco Area Develo~nt District, Inc. 
P.o. Box 636 catlettsburq 41129 
Gateway Area Development District, Inc. 
P.O. Box 107 OW1nqsville 40360 
~entucky River Area Development 
Lincoln Trail Area Development 
District, Inc. 
305 First Federal Buildinq 
Elizabethtown 42701 
Pennyrile Area Development District 128 North Main Street 
t'%j Hopkinsville 42240 
w 
w 
Jurisdiction 
Counties 
Bracken 
f'leminq 
Levis 
Maeon 
Robertson 
Counties 
Bell 
Clay 
Harlan 
Jacka011 
Knox 
Laurel 
Roctcastle 
Whitley 
Counties 
~ 
Carter 
Greenup 
Elliott 
Lawrence 
Counties 
Bath 
Menifee 
Montgomery 
Morgan 
Rowan 
Counties 
Breathitt 
Knott 
Lee 
Letcher 
Leslie 
OWsley 
Perry 
WOlfe 
counties 
Adair 
Casey 
Clinton 
Cumberland 
Green' MCCreary 
Pulaski 
Russell 
Taylor 
Wayne 
counties Breckenridge Grayson Hardin Larue Marion 
Meade 
Nelson Washinqton 
Counties Caldwell Christian Crittenden Ho;_:>Xins Livingstor, 
Lyon 
Muhlenberg Todd Trigg 
District:, Inc. 
P.O. Box 986 Hazard · 41701 
Lake CUMberland Area District, Inc. 
P.O. Box 377 Jamestown 42629 
Development 
Kentucky, con.t•.-' 15 
Clearinghouee 
Purchase Area oevelo~ent District Board of Directors 
P.O. Drawer N 607-1/2 w. Broadway Mayfield 42066 
Northern Kentucky Area 
DeveloPftent District 7505 sussex Drive Florence 410 42 
*Counties followed by an asterisk are within a clearinqhouse jurisdiction also. Therefore, counties will be sent to both clearinqhouses. 
Jurisdiction 
counties 
Ballard 
Calloway 
Carlisle 
Fulton 
Bickaan 
Graves 
Marshall 
NCCraclcen 

~ 
B.oone• 
Campllell• 
Carroll 
Gallatin 
Grant 
~tenton 
OWen 
Pendleton 

aetropolitan areawide notifications from these 
g 

n 
= 

; 

• 

~ 
""" 
= 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 ol:o. 
'o;t OFFICE OF MANAGBMBNT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE, METFOPOLITAN. AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES -
Jurisdiction 
~ 
Attala caz'roll Grenada Holmes Leflore Montgomery 
Yalobusha 
counties 
coahomaDeSoto• Quitman Panola Tallahatchie Tate Tunica 
Counties Alcorn 
Benton 
Marshall 
Prentiss Tippah Tishomingo 
Counties 
Boli.var 
Humphreys 
Issaquena 
Sharkey Sunflower Washington 
Counties Covington 
Forrest George 
Greene 
Hancock• Hnrrison• Jackson• Jefferson Ocivis Jones 
Lamar 
Marion 
Pearl River 
Perry 
Stone 
Wayne 
Counties 
~ 
Amite 
Claiborne 
Franklin 
Jefferson 
Lawrence 
Lincoln 
Pike 
walthall 
Wilkinson 
• 

"'C 
a 
~ 
.... 
= 
...I 
g z 
n 
= 

-~ ~ MISSISSIPPI 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
coordinator Federal-State Programs 
Office of the Governor 
.400 Watkins Buildinq 
510 Georqe Street 

Jackson · 39201 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Biloxi/Gulfport 
Gulf Regional Planning Commission 
P.O. Box Q206 
Gulfport 39501 

Jackson 
central Mississippi Planninq and 
Development District 
2675 River Ridge Road 

Jackson 39216 
Memphis, Tenn./Arkansas(~iss. 
Mississippi-Arkansas-Tennessee 
council of Governments 
Room 501r 125 North Main Street 
Memphis, Tennessee 38103 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
East central Mississippi Planning and 
Development .District 410 Decatur Street Newton 39345 
Golden Trianqle Planning and 
Development District Post Office Drawer ON State College 39762 
countie~ 
HanCOCk 
Harrisof" 
Jackson 

counties 
Copiah -· 
Hinds 
Rankin 

Madison 
Simpson 
warren 
Yazoo 

Arkansas portion: ,crit.tenden county 
~;!S..§l._f!~portion: 
UeSoto county 
Tennessee portior:: Co'!!!!_!_'}§. Fayette Lauderdale Tipton shelby 
Counties 
Clarke 
Jasper 
Kemper 
Lauderdale 
Leake 
Neshoba 
Newton 
scott 
smith 

counties 
Choctaw
Clay 

Lowndes 
Noxubee 
Oktibbeha' 
Webster 
Winston 

Mississippi. cont•d 
clearinghouse 
North Central Mississippi Planning and Development District 
P.O. Box 668 321 Summit Street Winona 38967 
North Delta Planninq and Development District 
P.O. Box 12Qtt Clarksdale 38614 
Northeast Mississippi Planning and oevelopme'nt District 
P.O. Drawer li-D Booneville ·38P29 
South Delta Planning and 
Development District Route 1, Box AB52 Greenville 38701 
Southern Mississippi Planning 
and Developrr.ent District 1020 32nd Avenue Gulfport 39501 
Southwest Mississippi Planning and Development District 
P.o. Box 636 Meadville 39653 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
l'u. _(., _ _,_...;.llpi • .:.<.. •• c ~ d 
•
Clearir,ghouse Jurisd.i.ction 
Three Rivers Planninq and counties
Develoanent District calhoun

99 Center Ridge Drive Chickasaw
Pontotoc 388 63 Itawamba
Lahiette
Lee
Monroe
Pontotoc
union 

•The counties followed by an asterisk are within a metropolitan
areawide clearinghouse jurisdiction. Notificaticms from these
counties should, therefore, be sent to both clearinghouses. 

g
s 
"%j 
w
VI 
; 
~
.....
=I
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
• 
"%j 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE# METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
~ ~ 
!:!QS~LINA 
STATE C~EARINGHOUSE 
Office of Intergovernmental Relations 
116 west Jones Street 
Raleiqh 27603 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Asheville 
Land of Sky Reqional Council Counties 
P.O. Box 2175 
Buncombe Asheville 28802 Henderson Madison Transylvania 
Charlotte* 
Centralina Council of Governments counties 
1229 Greenwood Cliff, Suite 301 cabarrus 
P.O. Box Q 168 Gaston Charlotte 28204 
Iredell Lincoln Mecklenburg ROwan Stanly Union 
Durham and Raleigh 
Trianqle J Council of Governments Counties 
P.O. Box 12276 
Chatham Research Trianqle Park 27709 Durham Johnson 
Lee 
Orange Wake 
Fayetteville 
Reqion M Council of Governments counties 801 Arsenal Avenue Cumberland Fayetteville 28305 Harnett 
Sampson 
Greensboro/Winston-Salem/High Point 
Piedmont Triad Council of Governments Counties 
Four Seasons Offices 
Alamance 2120 Pinecraft Road Caswell Greensboro 27407 Davidson Davie Forsyth Guilford Randolph Rockingham Stokes Surry Yadkin 
Wilmington 
Cape Fear Council of Governments counties 1 North Third Brunswick Suite 206 Columbus Wilminqton 28401 New Hanover Pender 
North carolina, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Other) 
Isothermal Planninq and 
Development commission 
306 Ridgecrest Avenue 
Rutherfordton 28139 
Kerr-Tarr Regional Council 
of Governments 
Post office Box 709 
238 Oranqe Street 
Henderson 27 536 
Reqion D Council of Governments 
Executive Arts Building 
Boone 28607 
Neuse River Council of Governments 
P.O. Box 1717 1404 Neuse Boulevard New Bern 28560 
Reqion L Council of Governments 
P.O. Drawer 2748 Rocky Mount 27801 
Lumber River Council of Governments 
2802 Rowland Avenue 
Lumberton 28 3 58 
Mid-East Economic Development Commission 
P.O. Box 1218 Washinqton 27889 
Southwestern Planninq and Economic 
Development commission Route 3, Box 338 Bryson city 28713 
Western Piedmont Council of Governments 
P.O. Box 3069 Ten 21st Avenue N.W. Hickory 28 60 l 
Jurisdict!2D: 
counties 
Cleveland 
McDowell 
Polk 
Rutherford 
Counties 
Franklin 
Granville 
Person 
Vance 
Warren 
Counties 
Alleghany 
Ashe 
Avery 
Mitchell 
Watauga 
Wilkes 
Yancey 
Counties 
Carteret 
Craven 
Duplin 
Greene 
Jones 
Lenoir 
Onslow 
Pamlico 
Wayne 
Counties Edgecombe Halifax Nash Northampton Wilson 
Counties 
Bladen 
Hoke 
Robeson 
Scotland 
Counties 
Beaufort 
Ber.tie 
Hertford 
Martin 
Pitt 
Counties 
Cherokee Clay 
Graham Haywood Jackson Macon· 
Swain 
counties Alexander 
Burke Caldwell Catawba 
"'0 
9 

Nl 
'"'" 
= 
I 
,j;o.. 
z 
g 
n 
1ft
.,. 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

•North-carolina. cant•4 
ClearinqhoU!I 
Albeaarle Reqional Plannin9 ana Develop.ent C~ieeion 
P.O. Box 589 II!ASenton 279]2 
Pee Dee Council of Governaente 
P.O. Box 728 Troy 27371 
l 
J!!fhclieti9!1 
~ 
C...Sen 
Cbovan 
CUrritaek Dare Gat.. &yae 
Paequotank Perqaieane 
Tyrrell vaabift9ton 
S2!!!lili!. 
An•on 
liont-ry MOore 
Rie-..s 
I 

s 

; 

t'%j 
w 
...... 
• 

~ ~ 
= 
•I 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
"%j 
OFFICE OF MANAGEliiENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED)sTA'i'E-, lmTROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL ci.E:Ail'INGHOUSES 
w 
SOUTH~
00 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
State Clearinqhouse 
Division of Administration 
1205 Pendleton Street, 4th Floor 
Columbia 29201 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Augusta, Ga./s.c. 
Metropolitan Council of Governments 
of Aiken and Richmond Counties 
121 Marion Avenue East 
North Auqusta 29841 

Charleston 
Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester 
Reqional Planning Commission 
2 Courthouse Square 
Charleston 29401 

Columbia 
Central Midlands Reqional 
Plahninq Council 
800 Dutch Square Boulevard 
Suite 155 
Columbia 29210 

Greenville, Pickens, and Spartanburg 
South Carolina Appalachian 
Council of Governments 
Drawer 6668 
211 Century Drive 
Greenville 29606 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Catawba Regional Planning Council 
P.O. Box 862 
107 Hampton Street 
Rock Hill 29730 

Lowcountry Reqional 
Planning Council 

P.O. Box 9e 
Yemassee 299115 

Lower savannah Regional Planning 
and Development commission 

P.o. Box 850 
Aiken 29801 

• 

Jurisdiction 
Georgia portion: Richmond County 
S.C. 	portion: Aiken county* 
Counties 
Berkeley 
Charleston 
Dorchester 

Counties 
Lexington 
Richland 
Fairfield 
Newberry 

counties 
Greenville 
Pickens 
Anderson 
Cherokee 
Oconee 
Spartanburg 

Counties 
CheSter-
Lancaster 
Union 
York 

Counties 
BeaUfOrt 
Colleton 
Hampton 
Jasper 

Counties 
Allendale 
Aiken• 
Bamberg 
Barnwell 
Calhoun 
Orangeburg 

south Carolina, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 
Pee Dee Regional Planning and Development Council 
P.O. Box 5719 Florence 29501 
Snatee-Wateree Regional Planning COuncil 
P.O. Box 1837 36 East Calhoun Street sumter 29150 
Upper Savannah Regional Planning and Development Council 
P.O. Box 1244 Greenwood 29646 
Waccamaw Regional Planning and Development Council 
P.O. Box Q19 Georgetown 294QO 
•counties followed by an asterisk are within a 
clearinghouse jurisdiction also. Therefore. counties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 
;
Jurisdiction 
~ 
Counties 
1-' 
Ch&Sterfield 
Darlington 	= I 
Dillon 
Florence 
• 
Marion 
Marlboio 
counties 
Clarendon 
Kershaw 
Lee 
Sumter 

counties 
Abbeville 
Edgefield 
Greenwood 
Laurens 
MCCormick 
Saluda 

Counties 
Georgetown 
Harry
Williamsburg 

metropolitan areawide notifications from these 
z 
0
...
;:; 
.., 	In 
"' 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
OFFICE OF IIIINAGEMENr AND BUDGET CIRCIJLAR 110. A-95 (REVISED) 
STATE. MEDIO\'OLITAN. AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES Tennessee. cont'd 

clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
TENNESSEE AREAWmE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) STATE CLEARINGBOIJSI! 
East Tennessee Development District 
~ 
State Planning Office 	1810 Lake Avenue Anderson• 
Grants Review Section 	Knoxville 37916 Blount• 
660 Capitol Bill Building 	Campbell 
Nashville 37219 	Clairborne 
Cocke Grainger 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 	Billlblen 
(Metropolitan) 	Jefferson Knox• Loudon 
Clearinghouse Juriadiction Monroe 
Morgan 
Chattanooga. Tenn./Ga.. Roane 
Scott 
Chattanooqa Area Regional Tennessee portion: Sevier 
Council of Governments Hamilton county Onion 

•23 Jaaee Building Georgia portion: 
735 Broad Street Counties First Tennessee-Virginia Counties 
Chattanooga 37•02 Walker Development' District Carter 

Dade 	207 North Boone Street Greene 
Catoosa Johnson City 37601 Hancock 
Bavkina 
Knoxville Johnsen 

Sullivan 
Knoxville Area Council 	unicoi
~ 
of Governments Anderson waahinqton, Tenne 1810 Lake Avenue Blount Knoxville 27916 knox southeast Tennessee Development counties District Bledsoe Memphis. Tenn./Afk./Mias. 423 James Buildinq Bradley 731 Broad Street Grundy z Miasiesippi-Arkanaaa-Tennesaee Tennessee portion: Chattanooqa 3'-02 Balllilton• g
council of Goverrunente Counties Marion 
Roan 501· Payette McMinn 
125 NOrth M&i n Street Lauderdale Meiqa 
lletllphie 38103 Shelby Polk 

s 
Tipton Rhea Arkaneae portion: sequatchie Crittenden county Miaaiaaippi portion: Northwest Tennessee Development counties Desoto county District Benton 
P.o. Box 63 CaJ"rOll 
!!ashville Martin 38237 Crockett 

Dyer 
Mid-Cumberland council of Governatnts Counties Gibson 
501 union Street. suite 600 Cheathu Henry 
Nashville 37219 Davidson Lake 

Montgomery Obion Robertson lleakley Rutherford Sumner Upper Cumberland Development District Counties llilliaJIISOn Burqeas Falls Road cannon Wilson cookeville 38501 Clay Bouaton Cumberland 
Humphreys 	DeKalb 
Stewart Fentress Trousdale Jackson l':l:j Dickson Macon OVerton 
Pickett 
Putnam 
w smith \0 van Buren 
Warren 
White 
; 
N 
.... 
= 
•I 
FEDERAL'-REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. ~MONDAY, JANUARY 10. 1977 
"'1 Tennessee, oont 'd 
"tl
Clearinghouse 
Jurisdiction 
~ Southwest Development District Counties
0 	a
P.O. Box 2385 
~ 	~
Jackson 38301 
Decatur 	.....
Hard.ea'liln QHardin IHaywood ol:oo-
Henderson
Madison
McNary 
South central Development District 	counties
P.O. Box 670 	Bedford
columbia 38401 	Coffee
Franklin
Giles
Rickman

Lawrence
Lewis
Lincoln
Maury
Marshall
Moore
Perry

Wayne 
•counties followed by an asterisk are within a Metropolitan areawide
clearinghouse jurisdiction also. Therefore, notifications from these
counties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 

azg 
FEDEIAL IEGISTEI, VOL 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUAIY 10, 1977 
• 
REGION V 
Illinois Indiana Michiqan Minnesota 
Ohio 
Wisconsin 
g 
n 
Ill 
"' 
l"lj 
.pI-' 
a ""= 

~ 
.... 
= 
~
FEDERAL REGISTE•R, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
OFFICE OF MANAGMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR 110.
>:r:j A-95 (REVISED)STATE, METROPOLITAN, and REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES "'C
Illinois, cont•d 
Clearinghouse 
JurisdictiOP N
-1:~ 	Ill9 
Rankakee ~ STATE CLEARINGHOUSE .......Kankakee County Regional Planning counties Q
. Commission 	I
Kankakee
state Clearinghouse •os East oak Street
Budqet of the Budget Kankakee 60901 

""'
103 State House
Sprinqfield 62706 St. Louis. Mo./Ill. 

East-West Gateway Coordinatinq Illinois portion:AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Counties
council (Metropolitan) 112 North Fourth Street MadiSOil
St. Louis, Missouri 63102 	Monroest. ClairClearinghouse 
Jurisdiction M\ssouri portion:St. Louis City
Bloomington/Normal 
Counties
Jefferson
McLean county Reqional Planning McLean county St.. Charles

Commission 
st.. Louis
305 Illinois HOUSe Franklin
207 West Jefferson Street
Bloominqton 61701 Sprinqfield 

Champaign/Urbana sangamon County Regional Planning Sangamon County
Commission
Champaign County Regional Planning 703 Myers Building

Champaign county
commission 1 West Old state Capitol
117 West Elm Street Springfield 62701
Urbana 61801 

Chicago AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES
(other)

Northeastern Illinois Planning Counties
Commission 
Cook 	gz
400 west Madison Street 	Dupage Greater Egypt Regional Planning counties
Chicaqo 60606 	and Development Commission Franklin
Kane 
P.O. Box 3160
Lake 	Jackson 
McHenry carbondale 62901 Jefferson Will Perry n Williamson 
m
Davenport/Rock Island/Moline, Iowa. Ill. 
SOutheastern Illinois Regional 

Counties
Bi-State Metropolitan Planning 	Planning and Develo~ent Commission
counties 	Gallatin
Commission Harrisburg National Bank Building
1504 Thil'd Avenue Im;;ors-portion: Harrisburq 62946 Hamil.ton 

Mercer 	Hardin
Rock Island 61201 
Rock Island Pope Iowa portion: Saline scottMuscatine Greater Wabash Regional Planning Counties
Commission 
Edwards
Decat..ur 	110 south Middle street Wabash
Grayville 628QQ 

Wayne
Macon county Regional Planning Macon county White

commission
253 East Wood street South Central Illinois Regional counties
Decatur 62523 Planning and Development Commission Effingham
107a south Broadway 

Fayette
Salem 62881
~ 	Marion 
Peoria Tri-Count.y Regional Planning Couties Northwest Illinois Regional Council counties
commission Peoria of Public Officials ca;rou-
Box 2200 210 East Third Street

Tazewell 	Joe Daviess
East Peoria 61611 	sterling 61081
Woodford 	LeeWhiteside
Rockford, Ill./Wis. 
western Illinois 

counties
Rock Valley Metropolitan Council Illinois portion: Regional Council Henderson

401 West State Street 	Counties P.O. Box 596 McDonough
Rockford 61101 	Macomb 61455 Warren
~
Winnebago
Wisconsin portion:
Rock County 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
Illinois. coot.' d 
Clearinghouse .Jurisdiction 
southwestern Illinois Metropolitan Counties 
and Reqional Planning commission ~ 203 West Main Street Clinton collinsville 622H Randolph 
Washington 
9 

n 
rn 
"' 
1-%j 
w ~ 
• 

FEDERAL P.EGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
~ 
s""' 

~ 
.... 
= 
~ 
OFFICI! OF IIAIIAGBIIENT ARD BUDGIIT CIRCULAR RO. A-95 (RIIIIISI!D)S'I'ATB, IIBTROP<ILITAR, AND REGIOIUIL CLI!ARINGBOUSES 
~ ~ 
~ 
STATE CLBARINGBOUSI! 
Clearinghouse Review Officer 
Indiana Budget Agency 
212 State Bouse 
Indianapolis 46204 

AREAWIDE CLJ!ARINGBOIJSES (Met:ropolitan) 
Clearinabowse 
Jurisdiction 
Ander80!!(MW1Cie 
Region Six Planning and counties Development Coanission Blackford 207 .Nortb Talley Delaware 
I!Uncie 47 303 
Grant 
Henry Jay Madison Randolph 
Gary/Hammond/East Chicago 
Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Counties Commission 
Lake 
8149 Kennedy Avenue Porter Biqbland 46322 
Cincinnati. Ohio/~y./Ind. and 
Hamilton/Middletown, Obio 

Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI) council Indiana eortion: of Governments 
~ 
1126 East Fourth Street 
Dearborn 
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 
Ohio 
Kentucky portion:counties Boone Ca11pbell Kenton 
Ohio portion: 
~ 
Bult.er Clinton Cleraont Hamilton warren 
Evansville, Inc.~y. 
Southwestern Indiana and Kentucky Indiana portion:
Reqional council of Governments Counties Civic center complex · Gibson Room 312. Administration Building Pike 
Evansville 47708 Posey Vanderburgh Warrick Kentucky portion: Henderson County 
Fort wavne 
Northeastern Indiana Regional counties Coordinating Council 
~ 
City-County Building Allen Fort wayne 4680~ DeKalb wells 
Indiana, cont• d 
Clearinghouse 
Indianapolis 
Indiana Heartland coordinating 
Coaanission 
74 2 North Shadeland Avenue 
Indianapolis 46250 
LaFayette/M~ LaFayette 
Regional IV Development ComNission court House LaFayette 47901 
LOuisville, Ky./Ind. 
~entuckiana Regional Planning
and Development Agency 505 west ormsby Avenue LOuisville. Kentucky 40203 
south Bend 
Michigan Area council 
of Governments County-City Building south Bend 46601 
Terre saute 
west central Indiana Economic Development District 700 Wabash Avenue 
P.O. Box 627 Terre Haute 47808 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
n 

Jurisdiction 
counties 
Boone 
Hamilton 

Hancock 
Hendricks 
Johnson 
Marion 
Morgan 
Shelby 

counties 
Benton 
Carroll 
Clinton 
Fountain 
Montgomery 
Tippecanoe 
warren 
Wbite 

Indiana oortion: counties Clark Floyd 
Kentucky portion: counties Bullitt Henry Jefferson Oldham Shelby Spencer Trimble 
counties 
Elkhart 
Marshall 
St. Joseph 
Kosciusko 

counties 
clay 
Parke 
Sullivan 
Vermillion 
Vigo 

• 

""0 
a 
N 
1-' 
= 
~ 
g 

n 01 
Xndiana. cont'd 	' 
Clearinqhouse 	Jurisdiction 
AR~WIDE CL~IMGHOUSES 
(Other) 
Patoka Lake Regional Planning 	Counties 
Collllllii&sion 
-	Crawford
The courthouse 
Dubois 
Jasper 47546 
orange 
Perry 
Spencer 

southern Indiana Development counties 
ColftD'lisaion 

Davieas 
·P.O. Box 442 
Greene 
~ooqootee 47553 LaWrence 

Martin 
Region X Planning Conmiaeion 	Counties 
P.o: Bax 100 
Monroe 
Bloomington 47401 owen
Ouabache Regional Planning Coaunission Counties
23 south Broadway Cass 
Peru 46970 

Fulton 
Howard 
Miami 
Tipton 
Wabash 

Reqi6n XI Development Commission 	counties 
2530 sandcrest BouLevard 
Bartholome~ 
Columbus Q7201 
· 	Brawn 
Decatur 
Jackson 
Jennings 

Reqion XII Development COmmission 	Counties 
P.O. Box 127 Dearborn• 
Versailles Q70~2 	Jefferson z Ohio• Ripley Switzerland 
~ 
Xankakee-Iroquois Regional Counties Planning COmmission Jasper = 
P.O. Box 684 
Newton 
25 Bill Street 
Pulaski
Francesville 479Q~ 
Starke 
Reqion IX Development Commission 	Counties 
P.O. Box 661 FayE'tt.e
ConnersVille 47331 Franklin 
Rush 
Onion 
Wayne 
Reqion III-A coordinating counties 
Council 

LaGra:r.g;;;
Production Credit Association 
Nobel 
Buildinq 	steuben
P.O. Box 95 
Whitleyl\lbion 46701 
River Hills Reqional Planning counties 
Commission 

HarrTSon 
c/o Indiana Univ&rsity south East 	Scott 
P.O. Box 679 WashingtonNew Albany 47150 
1-:r:j 
*Counties marked by an asterisk. are also in a metropolitan areawide 
clea~inghouse jurisdiction. Terefore, notifications should be sent to

both clearinghouses.
+"" 	;
\J1 
t.:l 
...... 
= 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOl. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 
10, 1977 	,j:o. 
12:1 
.,
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CXPRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 2 
STATE. METROPOLITAN. AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
~ 
0\ MICHIGAN 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Department of Manage~nt and Budget 
Levis Cass BUildinq 
Lansinq 118913 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse .Jurisdiction 
Ann Arbor. Detroit 
southeast Hichiqan Council counties 
of Governments Macomb 
810 Book Buildinq Oakland 
1249 washinqton Boulevard Washtenaw 
DetroH 48226 Wayne 

Monroe (except 
Erie. Bedford. 
and Whiteford 
townships and 
City of Luna 
Pier) 
st. clair 
Livingston 
Bay City 
Bay Reqional Planninq Commission Bay County 
County Buildinq 
Bay City 48706 

Flint 
Genessee County Metropolitan Genessee County 
Planninq commission 
920 Beach street 
Flint 48502 

Grand Rapids 
West Michigan Regional Planning Counties 
Co~mission Allegan 
120q People's Buildinq Ionia 
60 Monroe at Ionia Kent 
Grand Rapids 49502 Lake 

Mason 
Mecosta 
Montcalm 
Newaygo~ 
Osceola 
~ 
Region TWo Planning Commission .Jackson county 120 West Michiqan Avenue 
Jackson 119201 
Kalamazoo 
Kalamazoo Metropolitan county Kalamazoo Count.y 
Planning Commission 
418 west Kalamazoo Avenue 
Kalamazoo 49006 

Michigan, cent• d 
Clearingh~ 
Lansing 
Lansinq Tri-County Reqional 
Planninq Commission, 2722 East Michigan Avenue Lansinq IJ8912 
Muskegon/Muskegon Heights 
west Michigan Shoreline Regional Development Commission 
The Torren~ House 
315 West Webster Avenue Muskegon 49440 
Saqinaw coun~y Me~ropolitan 
Planninq Commission Cowtty Courthouse Saginaw 4860 2 
Toledo, Ohio/Michigan 
Toledo Metropolitan Area 
Council of Governments IJ20 Madison Avenue Toldelo 4360 4 
AREAWIDE ·cLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Northwest Mlchiqan Regional 
Planning and Development Commission 233Q Aero Park court Traverse Cit.y Q9684 
Upper central Peninsula Planning 
and Development Regional Commission 2fl 15 1Qth Avenue. South Escanaba 4 98 29 
Western Upper Peninsula Planning and Development Region 
P.O. Box 365 Houqhton 49931 
southwestern Michiqan Reqional Planning 
commission 2907 Civision Street St. Joseph 49085 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, ,..MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
a
Jurisdiction 
~ 
..... 
= 
counties 
Clinton Eaton 
""' 
Ingham 
Counties Muskegon oceana Ottawa 
Saginaw County 
Michigan portion Monroe county (part) Whiteford Township Bedford Township Erie ToWnship City of Luna Pier 
Ohio portion.: counties rucas
Wood 
Erie 
Ottawa 
Sandsky 
g 
n 
11'1 
"' 
counties 
Antrim 
Benzie 
Charlevoix 
Grand Traverse 
Kalkaska 
Lelanau 
Manistee 
Missaukee 
wexford 
counties 
Alger 
Delta 
Dickinson 
MarquettE 
Menominee 
Schoolcraft 
counties 
Baraga 
Gogebic 
Houghton 
Iron 
Keweenaw 
Ontonagon 
Counties 
Berrien 
Cass 
Van Buren 
• 

Michiqan, cont•d 
Clearinghouse 
Sout~ Central Michigan Planning 
council connors Hall Nazareth Colleqe
Na%areth 49074 
Northeast Michiqan council of Governments 
P.O. Box Q.S7 131 ·Shipp Street Gaylord 49735 
>%j 
.p. 
-..J 
Jurisdiction 
Counties Barry Branch Calhoun 
st• .'Joseph 
countie§. Alcona Alpena 
Cheboygan 
Crawf,ord Montgomery oscoda 
~~:=~~Isle 
! 

n 
= 

; 

• 

~ 
.... 
= 
•I 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, .,...,, o-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
"%j 
-1:'
co 
OFFICE OF 111\.Nl\GEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
MINNESOTA 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
State Clearinghouse Minnesota State Planning Agency 101 capitol Square Building st. Paul 55101 
AREAWIDE CLEARINHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction 
Fargo/Moorhead. N. Dak./Minn. 
Farqo-Moorhead Metropolitan Minnesota portion: 
council of GoVernments Clay County 44 Foss Lane North Dakota portion: Moorhead 56560 <:ass County 
Minneapolis/st. Paul 
Metropolitan Council Counties Metro Square Building Anoka 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul 55101 ~=r~~ 
Hennepin Ramsey Scott washington 
Rochester-olmsted council Olmsted County 
of Governments 1421 lrd Avenue, s. E. Rochester 55901 
St. Cloud 
Central Minnesota Reqional Development counties 
Coounission Benton 1139 Franklin Avenue Sherburne Sauk Rapids 56379 Stearns 
wriqht 
Duluth 
Arrowhead Regional DevelOPIRent Counties 
Conunission St. Louis 200 Arrowhead Place Lake Duluth 55802 Cook 
Koochiching Atl<in Itasca carleton 
AREAWWE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Headwaters Regional Develos-ent. Counties 
CoJNnission Beltrilllli Box 59q clearwater Bewlidji 56601 Hubbard 
Lake of the Woods Mahnomen 
Six Eaat Regional Developaent Counties 
co-ission Kandiyohi City Auditori\111 MCLeod 311 west 6th street Meeker Will•ar 56201 Renville 
2 
Minnesota, oont•d 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction 
Northwest Regional Development counties 
commission Kittson q25 WOOdlawn Avenue Marshall crookston 57616 Norman 
Penninqton Polk Red Lake Roseau 
Region Nine Reqional Counties 
Qevelopment Commission Blue Earth· 709 North Front Brown Mankato 56001 Faribault 
Le Sueur Martin 
icollet Sibley· Waseca watonwan 
West Central Regional 
~ 
Development Ca.mission Becker Administration Buildinq Clay Ferqua Falls COIWI.unity College Douglas Ferqua Falls 56537 Grant 
Otter Tail Pope Stevens Traverse Wilkins 
Six West Regional Devel gpaaent Counties 
Co~~~~tission Biq Stone 128 West Sorenson Chippewa Appleton 56208 Lac Qui Parle 
SWift Yellow Medicine 
East central Regional 'DeVelopment 
~ 
co-iaaion Cottonwood 2711 Broadway Avenue Jackson Slayton 56172 Lincoln 
Lyon Murray Nobles Pipestone Redwood Rock 
southeastern Regional DeveloPMent Counties 
COIUiission Dodqe Marquette Bank suildinq Pilli1110re South Broad~y at 2nd S.E. Freeborn Rochester 55901 Goodhue 
&ouston 
Mower 
OlllBted* Rice Steele 
Wabasha 
Winona 
• Counties followed by an asterisk are within a metropolitan areawide clearinghouse jurisdiction-also. Therefore, notifications from these counties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 
"tj 
9 

1:1:1 
1-' Q 
I 
~ 
z 
0
... 

n 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL IEGISTU, VOL. 42~ ~ONDAY, JANUAIY 10, 1977 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
5'1:'ATE, METROPOLITAN. AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES Ohio, cont•d 

•
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
OHIO 
Townships Canaan 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Darby Fairfield Jefferson 
Office of the Governor 
PleasantState Clearinqhouse 
Pickaway county (part) : 
State Office Tower 
Townships
30 East. Bread street 
DarbyColumbus 143215 
Harrison 
Madison Scioto 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Union County (part):(Metropolitan) 
JeroJQe Township 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
Dayton 
Cleveland and Lotain/Elyria Miami Valley Regional Planning Counties 
Commission Darke

Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating counties Dayco Buildinq Greene 
Aqency CUyahoga 333 w. First Street Miami 
400 The Arcade Geauqa Dayton q Sll02 

Montgomery
Cleveland 1&11114 Lake Preble Lorain Medina Huntington/Ashland. w. va./Jc:y./Ohio 
Ak.ron. Canton 	KYOVA Interstate Planning CODiftiBsion ~entucky portion: 
P.O. Box 939 	Boyd County
Northeast Ohio Four County Regional 
counties 1221 Sixth Avenue Ohio portion:
Planning and Development Organiztion Portage Huntinqton. west Virqinia 25701 Lawrence County

137 south Main Street 	Stark County 
west Virginia portion:
Akron 44308 Suounit 

~ 
Wayne 	Cabell wayne
Cincinnati. Ohio/Ry./Ind. and 
Hamilton/Middletown, Ohio Lima 

Ohio-Ky. Ind. (OXI) Council of Ohio portion: Lima-Allen county Reqional Allen county
Governments Planning COmmission 

I
~ 
426 East Fourth Street Butler 	300 Colonial Buildinq
Cincinnati 45202 
Clinton 	Lima 45801 
a
Clarmont Hamilton Mansfield warren 
Indiana portion: Richland County Reg-ional Richland County counties Planninq COmmission Dearborn 35 North Park Street Ohio Mansfield 44902 
ll:entucky portion: 
counties 	Springfield 
~ 
campbell Cleark county-Springfield Regional Clark county Kenton Planning Commission Sprinqfield City Building
Columbus 
Sprinqfield 45501 
Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission Delaware County (part) : Steubenvillei'Weirton. Ohio/W.Va. 
51 4 South High Street Townships
Columbus 43215 Berkshire Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson (BHJ) Ohio eortion: 
concord Metropolitan Planning Commission Jefferson 
Genoa 81 q Adams street West Virginia portion: 
Harlem Steubenville 43952 Counties 
Liberty Brooke 
Orange Hancock 
Fairfield County (part}: 
Townships

l'%j 
Bloom 
Violet 
Franklin County 
Licking County (part) :

.J:'
Townships
\0 
Etna "tt Lirn.a Monroe 
Madison county (part): 
a 
~ 
,_. 
= 
I 
,j:lo.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAy, _JANUARY 10, 1977 
rj ""C' 
Ohio,. cont•d 
Clearinghouse 

-" 
:> Toledo 
Toledo Metrolitan Area 
council of Governments 
420 Adison Avenue 
Toledo qJ6oq 

Youngstown/Warren 
Eastqate Development and 
Transportation Aqency 
1616 Covinqton Street 

Younqstown 4lt510 
Wheeling. w. Va./Ohio 
Bel-0-Mar Interstate Planning Commission 2177 National Road 
P.O. Box 2086 
Wheeling. West Virginia 26003 


AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Buckeye Hills-Hocking Calley 
Reqional Development District 
II 10 St. Clair Building 
216 Putnam Street 
flllarietta 45750 

Maumee Valley REsource Conservation. 
Planning and Development Organization 1012 Ralston Avenue Defiance 113512 
Tuscarawas Valley Regional 
Advisory CoMmittee 

P.O. Box 66 
Cambridqe 43725 

Jurisdiction 
Ohio portion: 
Counties 
Lucas 
wood 
Eric 
Ottawa 

Sandusky 
Michigan portion: Monroe County (part) Whiteford Township Bedford Township Erie Township City of Luna Pier 
Counties 
Ashtabula 
Columbiana 
Mahoning 
Trumbull 


west Virginia portion: Counties Marshall Ohio 
Ohio portion: Belmont county 
Counties 
Athens 
Hocking 
Meigs 
Monroe 
Morgan 
Nobel 
Perry 
Washington 

counties 
Defiance 
Fulton 
Henry 
Paulding 
Williams 

counties 
Carroll 
Coshocton 
Guernsey 
Holmes 
Harrison 
Nuskinqum 
Tuscarawas 

e 

~ 
1-' 
= 
I 
"'" 
g 

2 

fEDERAL REG•mR, VOL 42, .-MONDAY, JANUAIY •o, 09n 

OF MANAGEM~NT AND BUDGET CIRCUlAR NO. 
A-95 {RF.VISED)
STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 

Wisconsin, cont' d 
•
WISCONSlt;' 	clearinghouse Jurisdiction 
superior 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 

Northwest Regional Planninq 
counties
Commission 
~
State Clearinqhouse 302 1/2 walnut stre~·t Bayfield
Bureau of Planning and Budqet Spooner 5G801 Burnett
Department of Administration Douglas
1 West wilson Stl""eet Ir~n
state Office nuildinq Price
Madison 53702 Rusk
Sawyer
Taylor
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Washburn
(Metropolitan) 

Appleton-OshY.osh
Clearinghouse 

Juri_~Gict.~on 
East Central Wisconsin Counties
Green Bay RE:qiona1 Planning Commission Calu.,et
1919 Americart Court Fond du Lac
Brown County Planninq C01'1mission Brown cour1 ':..y Neenah 54956 Green Lake
100 North Jefferson Street Marquette
Grt'!en Bay 511.301 Menominee
Outagamie

Kenosha. Mil11o1auKee, and Racin(, 	Shawano
Waupaca

southeastern Wisconsin Regional 	waushara
.£Q.I!!lU~
Planning Commission 	Winnebago
Kenosha
P.O. Box 769 
Milwaukee
916 North E·lSt AVf:'nU~ ozaul•.l?e

wauke-sha 5318f.. 	AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES
RO(~ ir.'~ 
~.;'ll wo:-th 

(Other.) 
Washingtvn 
southwestern Wi~consin'.iaukes~,a 
Counties
Regional Planninq Commlssion ~
~ 211 Pioneer Tower Building Green
Platteville 53818 

Iowa
Mississippi "Piver Req.l.~:na 	z
counties Lafayette
Planning cmnmission Buffc. to Richland
Grandview Bui ldinq 

n0....
Cr-3iwfo;o:_-ri
1707 Main Street west Central Wis~onsin Reqional 	countie~
Ja~J.:scn
LaCrosse 54601 	Planninq Co~mission
I-cCrosse Barron m Monrue 
131 Oxfcrd Avenue Chippewa 	Ill
Eau Claire 511701
Pepin Clark Pierce 
Dunn 
Tremp8ale..:u Eau Claire Vernon Pol it
St. croix
Madison 
North Cent.ral Wisconsin count1.es
Da.nf:' County Reqi":>nai Planning commission :Jane county Reqional Planning com~ission Forest
City-county Buildinq 2100 Main Street Juneau
Madison 53709 Stevens Point 54ij91 Langlade
Lincoln
Rockford, Wisc_./Jll.._ Marathon
Oneida
Rock Vallf'y Met.ropolitan Council !i!.§.£9.D.§i..£.YQ~ti Q!}: Portage

1101 west Stat~" Street 	Vilas
Rock cour1~:'r
Rocktord, Illinois 61101 	WooJ
I llino1s portion: 
counti~s
Wl;-nebago
Eounc 

i":l:j 
VI
1-' 
; 
~
='""
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 	I
~ 
':r:l I VI 
!'-). 
R E G I 0 N VI 
Arkansas Louisiana New Mexico Oklahoma Texas 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL.' 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
• 

"C 
5I 
~ ~ 
= 
""'
z 
g
;:; 
m 
Vt 
• 

OFFICE OF MANAGJ;MEIIT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
Department of Local 
State Planning an..1 

Clearinghouse 
900 First National 
Little Rock 72201 

Clearinghouse 
~ 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Services Development 
Buildinq · 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Fort Smith, Ark./Okla. 
Arkhoma Regional Planning commis.sion 523 Garrison Avenue 
P.o. Box 2067 
Fort Smith 72901 

Little Rock/North Little Rock 
Metroplan 100 Main Street Continental Building Little Rock 72201 
Memphis. Tenn./Ark./Miss. 
Mississippi-Arkansas-Tennessee 
council of Governments Room 501 City Hall 125 N. Main Street Memphis, Tennessee 38103 
Pine Bluff 
southeast Arkansas Regional P~anning commission 
P.O. Box 6806 
1300 Ohio Street 
Pine Bluff 71601 

Texarkana. Tex./Ark. 
Ark.-Tex. council of Governments 
P.o. Box 5307
l'%j 
Texarkana, Texas 75501 
' 
IJ1 
w 
Jurisdiction 
Arkansas oortion Counties 
~ 
sebastian Oklahoma portion: Counties 
Lei'IOr'e 
sequoyah 
Counties 
Pulaski 
Saline 

Arkansas portion: Crittenden county Mississippi portion: DeSoto County Tennessee portion: counties 
Fayette 
Lauderdale 
Shelby 
Tipton 

Jefferson county 
Arkansas portion: Miller County 
Texas portion: counties Bowie cass Morris Red River Delta Franklin Hopkins Lamar Titus 
FEDERAL REGISTER, 
Arkansas, cont•d 
Clearinghouse 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) ; 
central Arkansas Planning and Development District 
P.O. Box 187 112 Northeast Front Street Lonoke 72086 
Whate River Planning and Developrqent District 
P.O. Box 2396 Batesville 72501 
East Arkansas Planning 
and Development District 706 s. Main Street Jonesboro 72CI01 
Northwest Arkansas Planning and Development District 
P.O. Box 668 Harrison 72601 
Northwest Arkansas RegionalPlanning Commission 
P.o. Box 71l5 505-1/2 west Huntsville Avenue Springdale 7276q 
southwest Arkansas Planninq and Development District 
P.O. Box 767 Magnolia 71753 
west central Arkansas Planning ' and Development District Municipal Building, Box 1558 Hit Sprinqs 71901 
VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
•

Jurisdiction 
counties 
FiU1iilir 
Lonoke Monroe 
Prairie 
Counties Cleburne Fulton 
Independence 
Izard Jackson ShaJ:jP 
stone Van Buren White Woodruff 
counties 
cray
craiqhea<! Cross Saint Francis Greene Lawrence Lee Mississippi Phillips Poinsett Randolph 
counties 
~ 
Boone 
Carroll 
Madison 
Mahion 
Newton 
Searcy 
counties 
~ 
washinqton · 
~ 
Calhoun Columbia Dallas Hempstead Howard Lafayette Little River Nevada ouachita Sevier Union 
Counties 
~ 
conway 
Garland 
Hot Sprinqs 
Johnson 
Montgomery 
Perry 
Pike 
Pope 
Yell 
z 
9 
n 
m 
Ut 
"tt 
a 

~ 
1-' 
= 
•I 

t':tj Arkansas. cont'd 'i:l 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction 
s 
Ln western Arkansas Planninq+:--and Development District 523 Garrison Avenu€ 
P.O. Box 2067 Fort Smith 72901 
southeast Planning and Development District 
P.o. Box 6806 1108 Poplar Street Pine Bluff 71601 Counties 
F!"anklin 
Logan 
Polk 
Scott 
counties 
Arkansas Ashley Bradl€y Chicot Cleveland 
Desha 
Drew Grant Lincoln 
~ 
I-' 
Q 

ol:oo. 
z 
0 
-4 
n 
m
.,. 
n· 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
• 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 !REVISED) 
vermillion 
STATE, MF.TROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
LOUISIANA 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Office of Intergovernmental Relations Office of the ~overnor 
P.O. Box qqq55 
Capitol Station 
Baton Rouge 7oeoq 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
1'4~tropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Baton Rouge 
capital Region/Planning Commission 333 North 19th Street 
P.o. Box 3355 
Baton Rouge 70821 

Lafayette 
Lafayette council of Governments 
P.o. Box 3322 
Lafayette 70501 

Lclke Charles 
Calcasieu' Regional Planning Commission 
P.O. Box 31U 
Lake Charles 70601 

~ 
Ouachita Council of Governments Monroe City Plaza Monroe 71201 
New orleans 
Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, and St. Bernard Parish 
909 Masonic Temple Building 
333 st. Charles Avenue 
New Orleans 70130 

Shreveoort 
Shreve-Area council ot Local 
Governments 

P.o. ilox "31109 ~ Shreveport 71130 
I 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
VI 
(Other)
VI Acadiana Regional clearinghouse c/o Evangeline Economic Development District Council 
P.O. Box 3322 
LaFayette 70~01 

Jurisdiction 
~ 
Ascension East Baton Rouge East Feliciana Iberville Pointe coupee West Baton Rouqe West E:eliciana Washington 
Lafayette Parish 
Calcasieu Parish 
ouachita Parish 
Parishes Jefferson Orleans st. Bernard St. Tanunany 
Parishes Bossier Caddo 
Parishes 
~ 
Evangeline Iberia LaFayette• st. Landry St. Martin St. Mary 
Central Regional Clearinghouse c/o Kisatchie-Delta Economic Development 
District council 1220 MacArthur Drive Alexandria 71301 
Florida ~egional Clearinghouse 
P.o. Box 3355 Baton Rouge 70821 
Northeast Regional Clearinghouse c/o North Delta .Regional Planning 
and Development District 2115 Justice Street Monroe 11201 
Northwest Regional Clearinghouse c/o Coordinating and Development Council of Northwest Louisiana 
P.O. Box 37005 3305 Mansfield Road Shreveport 71103 
c/o Imperial Calcasieu Regional Planning and Development District Southwest Regional Clearinghouse 
P.O. Box 316Q Lake Charles 70601 
Teche Regional Clearinghouse c/o south central Planning an~ Development Cormnission 
P.O. Box BQ6 Thibodaux 70301 
Metrolpolitan Regional Clearinghouse 900 Masonic Temple Building 333 St.• Charles Avenue New Orleans 70130 
• The counties followed by asterisks are 
•

Parishes 
Avoyelles 
catahoula 
concordia 
Grant 
LaSalle 
Rapides 
Vernon 
Winn 

Parishes 
Ascension• 
East Baton Rouge* 
East. Feliciana• 
Iberville• 
Livingston 
Pointe coupee• 
st. Helena 
Tangipahoa 
Washington• 
west Baton RQuge• 
west Feliciana• 

Parishes 
Ca"idWeiT 
East Carroll 
Franklin 
Jackson 
Madison 
Morehouse 
Ouachita• 
Richland 
Tensas 
Union 
West carroll 

Parishes 
BieiiVITie 

Bossier* z 
Caddo• 
0
Claiborne ... 
DeSoto 
n
Lincoln 
m
Natchitoches ell Red River Sabine Webster 
Parishes 
Allen 
Beaureqci.rd 
Calcasieu• 
cameron 
Jefferson Davis 

Parishes 
Assumption 
LaFourche 
St. Charles 
St. James 
st. John the 

Baptist 
Terrebonne 

Parishes 
Jefferson• 
Orleans* 
Plaquemines 
St. Bernard• 
St. Tannany• 

within a metropolitan 
areawide clearinghOuse jurisdiction. Notifications from these counties should, therefore, be sent to both clearinqhouses. 
; 
~ 
.... 
= 
•I 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
"Zj 
"'CC 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMF.In' AND IIUDGF.T CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
STATE, METROPOLITAN, lii'D REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 

a
1.11 
0\ 
!!J:W~ 
STATE CLF.l\fiiNGHOUSF. 
St".at.e Planninq Office 
State capitol 
Santa Fe 87501 

AREAWIDE CLEARIRGIIOUSF.S (Metropolitan) 
Alburguergue 
Middle Rio Grande Council 
of Governments 
suit.e 1320 
SOS ~arquette Avenue. N.W. 
Alhurquerque 87101 

AREAWIDE C"..EARINGROUS!:S (Other) 
North central New Mexico 
Economic Development District 
~.0. Box U'8 
Sant.a Fe 87SO 1 

Eastern Plains Council of r.overnme-nt Curry county courthouse Clovis 88101 
san Juan Reqlonal COIIIIIl t't.ee 
P.O. Box 280 
Aztec 871l10 

AND 
McKinlP.y Council of Govern•ents 
JOO West Hill, Suite 
Gallup 87301 

southwest New Mexico 
Council of Governaents 

P.O. Box 2157 
Silver City 88061 

SOuthern Rio Grande 
Council of Governaenta 
City county Buildinq 
575 s. Alameda 
Las Cruces 88001 

SOutheastern New Mexico 
Economic oevelopnent District 

P.O. Box 6639, RIAC 
Roswell 88201 

t.:l 
.... 
•I
= 

Counties iieriiiiiiTlo sandoval Torrance Valencia 
Countlee 
~ 
Los Alall\os 
MOra Rio Arriba Raos san Miquel 
Santa Fe 
~ 
Curry De Baca 
I Guadalupe n Rardinq Quay 
= 
Roosevelt 
IJnion 
counties, 
~ 
counties Mcltinley 
~ 
Catron 
Grant 
Rildal<JO 
Luna 
Counties 
Socorro 
Sierra 
Dona Ana 
Counties 
C"i\i'VeS 
Eddy 
Lea 
Lincoln 
Otero 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
OI'P'IC'I OF MANAGUIFNT AND BODGET CIRCIJLAR ·NO, A-95 (REVISED)STIIII'E, MB'I'ROPOLITAN, IIIID REGIONAL CLEARINGHOOSl!S 
OJ{LAHOMA 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Office of CO..unity Affairs and Planning
State Grant-in-Aid Clearinqhouse 
5500 NOrth Western 
Oklahoola City 73118 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
Fort SMith, Ark,/Okla. 
Arkhoma Regional Planning ComMission Arkansas portion:523 Garrison Avenue counties 
P.o. Box 2067 · sebastian Fort Sodth, Arkansas 72901 crawford OklahOIM portion: 
counties LeFlore Sequoyab 
Lawton 
Association of South Central 	Counties 
Oklaho.a Govern.enta ~ 802 Main street comanche Duncan 73533 cotton 
Grady Jefferson MCClain 
Stephens 
Tilllll&n 
Okl&hOIIIa Cit:y 
Association of central Oklahoma Counties Governments 
CAnadian Suite 200 Cleveland 
Q801 Classen Boulevard LoganOklahoma City 73118 Oklahana 
I!!!!.! 
Indian Nations COuncil of Governments Counties 630 West 7th Street: Creek Tulsa n127 osage 
Tulsa 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Central Oklahoma Eqpnomic 	counties 
Development District Creek 16 East Ninth Street RuqhesShawnee· 711801 
Lincoln 
Okfuskee 
Pawnee 
Payne
Pottawatomie 
Seminole 
1-zj 
Oklaha.a. cont•4
•
clearincihouse 	Ju.-isdiction 
Northern Oklahoaa Develop.ent counties Association Alfalfa 
P.O. Boa 3507 	Blaine 
Enid 	73701 Garfield 
Grant 
J{ay 
J{ingfisber 
Major 
Noble 

Eastern Oklahoma Bconoai~ 	counties 
Development District ~ P,O, Boa 1367 cherokee Mliskogee 7UO1 Mcintosh 
Musk(,g"ee 
OkMUlC)ee Sequoyah• wagoner 
J{iamichi EconoMic Developaent counties District CiiOCtaV 
P.O. Box 638 	Haskell 
Wilburton 	74578 Latimer LeFlore• MCCurtain Pittsburg Pushmataha 
Northeast Counties of Oklahoma Counties Econoaic Developaent District Craig
P.o. Drawer E Delaware 215 south Wilaon Mayes Vinita 7U01 Nowata 
Ottawa 
Roqers 
washington 
southern Oklahoma Development counties Association ~ 
P.O. Box 3125 Bryan Ardmore Air Park carter Ardmore 73401 coal 
Garvin 
Johnston 
Love Marshall Murray Pontotoc 
southwestern Oklahoma Development counties District Association Beekham 
P.O. Box 569 	custer 
Burns 	Flat 73624 Greer Harmon Jackson 
J{iOWJl 
Roqer Mills waShita 
Oklahoma Economic Development 
~ 
Association 	Beaver 
P.O. Box 668 Cimarron 330 Douglas Avenue Dewey Beaver ·73932 Ellis 
Harper Texas Woods woodward 
• counties marked by an asterisk are also in a metropolitan
clearinghouse jurisdiction. Notifications, therefore. should be to both clearinghouses. 
2 
• 

areawide 
sent 	"'C 
g z 
n 
m 
"' 
~ 
V1 
..... 
-..J Q FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 oj;o. 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCtlLAR NO. A-95 (REVISED)STATE, ll'l'ROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
l'zj 
~ 
\J1 	under state PNRS procedures, no project notifications will be sent directlY to the State clearinqhouae, only the metropolitan or regionalclearinghouse need be notified. The State clearinqhouae is notified in turn by the metropolitan and regional clearinqhouses. 
STATE CLEARmGHOUSE 
Governor's Budget and Planning Office 
Executive Office Building
Q11 West 13th Street 
Austin 78701 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
~ 
West central Texas Council Counties of Governments ar;;n
P.o. Box 3195 Callahan 33Q9 N. Twelfth Street Cole[l\anAbilene 7960Q cananche 
Eastland Fisher Haskell 
Jones Kent Knox 
Mitchell Nolan Runnels scurry Shackelford 
Stephens Stonewall 
Taylor 
Throckmorton 
~ 
Panhandle Regional Planning commission Counties 
P.o. Box 9257 ArmStrOngAmarillo 79105 Briscoe 
Carson castro Collingsworth Oallam 
Deaf Smith Donley Gray Hall 
Hansford 
Hartley 
Hemphill 
Hutchinson Lipscomb Moore 
Ochiltx;-ee 
Oldham Parmer Potter Randall Roberts 
Sherman 
Swisher 
Wheeler 
Texas. cont•d 
Clearinahouse 
1\artin 
The capital Area Plann:l.nq council 
611 South Conqress · 
suite 'oo 
Austin 7870' 
Beaumont(Port Arthur/Orange 
south East Texas Regional Planning 
COmmission 

P.o. Drawer 1387 
Nederland 77267 

Brownsvill/Bariingen/San Benito. and McAllen/Pharr/Edinburg 
Lower Rio Grande valley 
Development council First National Bank Buila1nqMcAllen 78501 
Brvan-college Staton 
Brazos valley Development Council 
P.o. Drawer 4128 Bryan 77801 
corpus Christi 
costal Bend Council of 
Governments Suite 200 Q600 Parkdale Drive 
P.o. Box 6609 Corpus Christi 78q11 
Dallas and Fort Worth 
North Central Texas Council of Governments 
P.O. Drawer COG Arlington 76011 
Jurisdiction 
cguntiee 
Bastrop 
Blanco 
BUrnet 
Caldwell 
Fayette 
Baya 
Lee 
Llano 
Travis 
Williamson 
counties 
Hardin 
Jefferson 
orange 
counties 
ca;erc;n 
Hidalgo Willacy 
counties iiHOS 
Burleson 
Grime!I 
Leon 
Madison 
Robertson 
Washington 
counties Ariii9iS 
Bee 
arooks 
Duval Jim Wells 
J:enedy 
Kleberg Live oak McMullen Nueces Refugio San Patricio 
counties 
CoiiTil 
Dallas 
Denton 
Ellis Erath 
Hood Hunt 
Johnson 
Kaufman 
Navarro Palo Pinto Pafker Rqtkwall somervell Tarrant 
~ise 
"tt 
2 	a 
~ ~ 
• Q I 
z 
0 
::! 
n 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, 	10, 1977
N.MONDAY, JANUARY 
Texas. cont•d 
Texas. cont.•4
Clearinghouse 

Jurisdiction 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction
El Paso 

Midland and odessa
west Texas council of Governments counties 

Permian Basin Reqional
1200 Roth Mesa Brewster 	~
El Paso 79902 	Planninq Commission Andrews
CUlberson 
P.O. Box 6391 	Borden
El Paso Midland 79701 	Crane
Hudspeth DawsonJeff Davis 
EctorPresidio 
Gaines
Houston and Galveston/Texas cuty Glasscock

Howard
Houston-Galveston Area council Loving

Counties
3701 west Alabama. Avenue Austin 	Martin
3701 West Alabama Avenue Brazoria 	Midland
Houston 77027 	Pecos
Chambers Reeves
Colorado 
Terrell
Fort Bend
Galveston 
Upton
Ward
Harris 
Winkler
Liberty
Matagorda 
san Antonio
Montgomery
Walker Alamo Area Council of Governments CountiesWaller 
QOO Three A Life Building 	AtaS'COSa
Wharton 	san Antonio 78205 
Bandera
Jl:illeen/Te!!!ple Bexar
Comal
central Texas Council of Governments counties Frio

P.O. Box 729 	Gillespie
~
Belton 76513 	Guadalupe
Coryell
Ba11ilton 
Karnes Lallpasas 
Kendall
Iterr
Mila• 
MedinaMills Wilson z
san saba 
Laredo san Atlgelo 	0-t 
south Te:w;as DevelopMent council 	concho valley Council of Governments Counties n
counties 	1ft
Laredo Iriternation Airport Jill Roqg 	7 W. TWohig Building, ROOII 505 Coke
Buildinq s-1 	starr san Angelo 76901 Concho
Laredo 7Bo•o 	crockett "'
webb 
Irion
Sapata 
Kimble
Lubbock Mason
MCCUlloch
Menard

SOuth Plains Association of Governments counties
Lubbock National Bank Building 	REagan
Bailey
Lubbock 7U01 	Schleicher
Coehan 
Sterling
crosby Sutton
DickensFloyd Tom Green 
caraa 	Sherru.JVDenison
Bale
Hockley

l!ing 	Texoma Regional Planning ComMission £!!!!!!!!!.!
1000 Arnold Boulevard CookeLamb Denison 75020 Fannin
Lubbock
Lynn 

Grayson 
"!!:j 	!!OtleyTerryYoa,.,. 
1.11
\0 
i~
=.... 
PIDEIAL IEGiml, YO~. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 	I
""' 
Texas. cont•d ~ 
Texas. cont•d 
'"'1 Clearinghouse 
Texarkana, Tex./Ark. 
0 ~ 
Ark-Tex council of Governments 
P.O. Box 5307 
Texarkana 75501 

Tyler 
East Texas council of Governments 
Fifth Floor. Citizens Bank Building
Kilgore 75662 

~ 
Heart of Texas council of Governments 110 south 12th street Waco 76701 
Wichita Falls 
Nortex Regional Plannihq Commission 191Q Rempt Boulevard Wichita Falls 76309 
Jurisdiction 
Texas portion: counties 
~ 
cass 
Delta 
Franklin 
Hopkins 
Lamar 
Morr-is 
Red River 
Titus Arkansas portion: 
Miller County 
counties 
Anderson 
camp 
Cherokee 
Gregg 
Harrison 
Henderson 
Marion 
Panola 
Rains 
Rusk 
Smith 
Upshur 
Van Zandt 
Wood 
Counties 
BOS"qUe 
Falls 
Freestone 
Hill 
Limestone 
McLennan 
counties 
Arcli'er-
Baylor 
Childress 
Clearinghouse 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Deep East Texas Development Council 272 ~. Lamar Street Jasper 75951 
Golden crescent council of Governments 
P.O. Box 2028 Victoria 77901 
Middle Rio Grande Development Council 
P.O. Box 1461 Del Rio 78840 
Jurisdiction 
Clay 
cattle 
Foard 
Hardeman 
Jack 
Montague 
wichita 
wilbarger 
Young 
counties Angelina Houston Jasper Nacogdoches Newton POlk sabine San Augustine san Jacinto shelby Trinity Tyler 
counties 
calhoun 
DeWitt 
Goliad Gonzales Jackson Lavaca Victoria 
~ 
Dimmit Edwards Kinney LaSalle Maverick Real uvalde Val verde zavala 
a 

~ 
...... 
= 
oil
z 
0 
-t 
n 
m 
ut 
FEDERAL RJGISTER, VOL•. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10; 1977
• 


NOTICES Pam 210-4 
• 

• 

.. 
...... 
0 
z 
.,
" 
....
s: 
"0 
... :
.. 
§ ..
.. :m .. m 
.. "' c .. .,.,
~ .. ... 
0: .... IE
" "' 
F -61 

%j 
"0
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) 
• 

STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
Iowa, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 
Sioux City, Iowa/Nebr./S.D. 
Siouxland Interstate Metropolitan Planning Council 
P.O. Box 447 626 Insurance Exchange Building Sioux City 51102 
Waterloo 
Iowa Northland Reqional 
Council of Governments· Russell Lamson Euilding 2009 West Fifth Street Waterloo 50701 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other) 
Upper Explorerland Regional
Planning commission 134 West Green Street Postville 52162 
Mid Iowa De7elopment Association 
Regional Planning Commission Wahkonsa Manor 12 south 10th street Fort Dodge 50501 
Southern Iowa Regional Planning Agency 215 North Elm Street Creston 50801 
North Iowa Council of Governments 202 First s. E. Mason City 50401 
Northwest, Iowa Regional 
council of Governments 407 1/2 Grand Avenue Box 406 Spencer 51301 
" 

N IOWA 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Office of Planning and Programming 
523 East 12th Street 

Des Moines 50319 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Cedar Rapids 
Eastern Iowa Association of RPCs 
332 East washington 
Iowa City 522lt0 

Davenport/Rock Island/Moline, Iowa/Ill. 
Bi-State Metropolitan Planning 
commission 
1504 Third Avenue 
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 

Des Moines 
central Iowa Regional Association 
of Local Governments 
104 1/2 East Locust Street 

Des Moines 50 309 
Dubuque 
East central Intergovernmental 
Association 
22 Fischer Building 
Dubuque 52001 

Omaha, Nebr./Iowa 
omaha-Council Bluffs Metropolitan 
Area Planning Agency 
7000 west Center Road 
Omaha, Nebraska 68106 

Jurisdiction 
counties 
eentorl 
Iowa 
Johnson 
Jones 
Linn 
washington 

counties 
Ic;;;aportion: scott Muscatine 
Illinois portion: Mercer Rock: Island 
counties 
eoone-
Dallas 
Jasper 
Madison 
Marion 
Polk 
Story 
Warren 

Counties 
Cedar 
Clinton 
Delaware 
Dubuque 
Jackson 

Iowa portion: counties ~tamie Mills 
Nebraska portion: counties Douglas Sarpy 
Jurisdiction 

Iowa portion: Counties Cherokee Ida Monona woodbury 
Nebraska portion: Dakota county south Dakota portion: Union county 
Counties 
Black Hawk 
Bremer 
Buchanan 
Butler 
Chickasaw 
Grundy 

Counties 
Allamakee 
Clayton 
Fayette 
Howard 
Winneshiek 

counties 
Calhoun 
Hamilton 
Humboldt 
Pocahontas 
Webster 
Wright 

Counties 
Adair 
Adams 
Clarke 
Decatur 
Ringgold 
Taylor 
Union 

counties 
cerro-GOrdo 
Floyd 
Franklin 
Hancock 
J(:ossuth 
Mitchell 
Winnebago 
worth 

counties 
Buena Vista 
Clay 
Dickinson 
Emmet 
Lyon 
O'Brien 
osceola 
Palo Alto 
Sioux 


s 

~ 
.... 
= 
~ 
z 
0
... 

n 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

3 
Iowa. con~'4 
JUr1a41ct11!!
Clearingbg»ee 
~
Southeaat laMa Reqlonal 
DeBiiOiii•
Plennlnq CO..iaaion 
Henry
P.O. BOO! 911 Lee
Jteokllll 52632 	Louin 
Re9ion Six Plannin9 qo.ataalon 	~
R&r!Iil
10 Moodbary Bail41n9 
llarehall
8 ltOrth Firat A""nae
Marahalltown 50158 	-·•hi.ek
Tau 
Reqlon 1Z council of Gover....,.ta 	£!!!!!lllg
Aa4ubon527 V2 Korth 114&•• 
Carroll
P.O. Sol< 663 crawforcl
carroll 5,.01 
Greene
Guthrie
sac 
Area XV R891onal Plamln9 co-1aeion 	counties
Appanooaa
l!laU4inq No. U 	Davie
Otto-• In4ustrial Airport Jefferson
ott-• 52501 
Jteokul<
Lucas
Mahaaka
liOnroe
Van Buren
wapello
Wayne 
countiea
sout-at Iova R89ional 
caes
Planninq Coaataaion 
vreaont
P.o. Sol< I 
Harrison
GXievolcl 51535 	llontqoaery
Paqe
Shelby 

'%1 
0\(....) 
FEDERAL IEGimR, VOL 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
gz 
n
Ill
Ut 

; 

~
.....
~
I,jlo. 
OI"FICE OP I!IIIUIG..ERI' AND BUDGET CIRCULM NO. A-95 
(REVISED)
STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIOIIAL CLEARINGHOUSES "ttJanaas. cont •d>o;S 
a
!5M!lli Clea·rinahouae 
Jurisdiction
I ~
Northwest Kansas Planning C~esion
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE P.O. Box 2-8 Counties .....
0\ •
Ch~yenne
~ Hill Ci~y 67U2 =
Decatur IDivision of St.~te Planninq Ellisand Researc~ Gov.eU..partment of Adioinistration GrahamState Office Buildinq Loqan
Topel<a 66612 Norton
osborne
Phillips
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES Rawlins
(-.etropolitan) Rooks
Russell
Sheridan
~ansas City. ~o./xan. Sherman
Smith

Mid-America Regional Council Thomas
Missouri porti_on:
20 west Ninth Street Trego
counties
Third Floor Wallace
~
Kansas City. Missouri 64105 Clay Chikaskia-Indian Hills Regional 
counties
Jackson Planning commission 
Barber
Platte P.O. Box 301 
..C!'omanche
Ray Pratt county courthouse 
Harper
Jeansas portion: Pratt 671211 
Kingman
counties 
Kiowa
Johnson 
Pratt
Leavenworth 
sumner
Wyandotte 
Topeka Greater Southwest Regional 

counties
Planning Commission 
Clark
Topeka-Shawnee County 1802 Jones Avenue Finney
Metropolitan Planning Agency shawnee county P.O. Box 893 Fori!

Garden City 678116
shawnee County court House, Room 209 Grant
Topeka 66603 Gray
Greeley 

gz
~ Ha~ton
Haskell
Wichita-Sedgwick County Metropolitan ROd.geman
Sedgwick County n
Area Pl3nninq OepartmP.nt Kearny 1ft455 North Main Street Lane eft
Wichita 6 ., 202 Meade
Morton
St. JOBP.ph. Mo./~an. Ness
scott
Mo-K~n Reqional Council seward

Mi eeouri portion:
11,.29 South 169 Highw~y stanton
counties
~~t •.JoReph, Mi ~souri 6lllj0'7 Stevens
Andrew 
Wichita
Buchanan
Clinton Golden Belt Reqional Planning 
counties
De!falb Commiseion 
Barton
Brown (part) City Hall 
Edwards
City of Horton 'f19 aroQdway 
Pawn~e
l(ansas portion: Larned 67550 
Rush
City of Atchison 
suftord
Doniphan county Mid-State Regional Planninq 
Counties
commission
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES P.o. Box 963 McPii'erSOn
lteno
(Other) McPherson 67460 
Rice Southeast Ransas Regional
Big Lakes Regional Counties
counties Planning commission
Planning commisRion ~
~omie Memorial Building
~il~y county cour+hous~ Bourbon
Riley Chanute 66720
~anhatt.an 66502 Cherokee
Geary 
crawford
La bette
Montgomery
Neosho
Wilsor
woodson 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
Jran•••• con~'d 
C:lHrinahouee 
Rorth Central J~egional Planning 
coo.ieeion Ronicipol Bailainq ..loit 671120 
Plint Bllle Reqional Planninq eo.ol.eeion P.O.-L Strong City 66869 
JurisaicUon 
~ ~ 
Bll8WOrth 
J-11 Lincoln Mitchell Otta
RepablicSaline 
counties 
Chase 
Dicldneon Lyon 
Marion 
Mqrris 

z 
g 
n 
m 
"' 
1-:!:j 
0\ IJ1 
~ 
1-' 
= 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 ~ 

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. 
A-95 (REVISED)STATE, METROPOLITAN, ANt REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES ""Cl
Missouri, cont•d
'"'1 
MISSOURI 	Clearinghouse 
Jurisdiction
I 	a
Springfield Nl 0\ STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 1-' 0\ Southwest Missouri Local Government counties =Advisory Committee 
I
Office of Administration P.O. Box I ~ ol:lo.Division of Sta.te Planning and Analysis Republic Christian
65738
P.O. Box 809 Dade
State capital Dallas
Jefferson Cit.y 65101 Greene
Lawrence
Polk
Stone

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
Taney
(Metropolitan) Webster 
-~~~ 
Jutisdiction AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
Co1u_!!!bia (Other) 

Mid-Missouri Council of
Governments counties Boonslick P.egional Planninq counties

Commission
830 E. High Street ~ P.O. Box 31H Lincoln
Jefferson City 65101 B()()ne MOntgomery

callaway Bi lmac Plaza Warrencole 
Highways 40 & Q7
Warrenton 63383

cooperHowardMoniteau Bootheel Regional Planning counties
conunission
Osage P.o. Box 	DtinkTin
397
Kansas City, Mo:/Ran. Malden 63863 Mississippi
New Madrid 
Mid-Am~rican Regional Council Pemiscot
20 w. Ninth Street Missouri portion: scott

Kansas City 	counties Stoddard
6U105 
cass-
Clay 	Green Rills Regional Planning counties
Commission Platte Grundy county court House
Jackson 	~ z 
Trenton 64683 	Daviesa 0
Ray 	Grundy
J<ansas portion: Harrison n::! counties Linn mJOiii1'SOrl LivinqstonLeavenworth MercerWyandotte Putnam 
"'
st. JQ~eeh, Mo./Ran. Sullivan 
Raysinger Basin Reqional Planninq
Mo-Ran council of Governm~nts commission counties

Missouri portion:
4529 south 169 Highway 	9th ana ~ast Ohio ~
Counties
st. Joseph 64507 	Clinton 6Q735 Benton
~ 	Cedar
Buchanan FJenryClinton HickoryDeltalb 
st. clair
Brown (part) VernonCity of HortonRansas portion: Lake of the ozarks Regional Counties
City of Atchison 	Planning Commission
P.o. Box 786 	C8m'deil
Doniphan county 	Laclede
Camdenton 65020 
Miller
St. ·Louis, Mo./Ill. Morgan
Pulaski
East-west· Gateway coordinatinq Mark Twain Regional Planning
Council Missouri portion: commission ~

St. Louia.. City
112 North Fourt Street 	227 North Rollins Lewis
suite 1200 	counties Macon
Jefferson 

P.O. Box 389
St. Loui'3 63102 	Macon 63552 Marion
St. Charles Monroest. Louis PikeFranklin RallsIllinois portion: Randolph
counties shelbyMadisonMonroeSt. Clair 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOl.. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
n 	• 
Missouri, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 
Meramec Regional Planning 
commission 101 West 10th street Rolla 65Q01 
Missouri Valley Req~onal Planning Commission Farmers Savings Bank Buil~ing 
P.o. Box 7Q7 Marshall 653QO 
Northeast Missouri Reqional 
Planning canmission Adair county court House Rirksville 63501 
Northwest Missouri Regional Planning Commission 
P.O.• Box 370 Maryville 6QQ68 
Ozark Foothills Regional Plannin9 Conunission 
P.o. Box 124 Ellsinore 63937 
Ozark Gateway Regional 
Planning Commission Freeman Building 2008 serqeant Joplin 6Q801 
Show-me Regional Planning Commission 
P.O. Box 3Q8 
103 Business Route 50 Wet.t 
warrensburq 64093 
SOuth Central Ozark Regional 
Planning Canmission Williams Buildinq west Plains 65775 
SOutheast Missouri Reqional 
Planning COMmission 19 North Main Street Perryville 63775 
1-:J:j 
0\ '-I Jurisdiction 
Counties 
cra:wtOrd 
Dent 
Gasconade 
Maries Phelps Washington 
Counties 
carrorr-
Chariton 
saline 
Counties 
Adair Clark 
Rnox 
Schuyler scotland 
counties 
itciiiSoii 
Gentry Holt 
Nodaway 
Worth 
Counties 
~ 
carter" Reynolds Ripley 
wayne 
coun+.ies 
Barton Jasper McDonald 
Newton 
~ 
Johnson 
Lafayette Pettis 
counties Douglas Rowell 
oregonozark Shannon 
Texas 
Wri<;ht 
counties Bollin<;er Cape Girardeau Iron Madison Perry St. Francois ste. Genevieve 
z 
0
...

;:; 
m 
"' 
s ""C' 
• 

~ 
..... 
• e 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 


"'1 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISF.D) 
""C
STATEr METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
Nebraska, cont•d
I 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction
0'1 	a
~ 
~
00 southeast Nebraska council of counties ,....Governments :JohriSOil Q
STATE CLERINGHOUSF 
P.O. Box 437 	Nemaha I
Humboldt 68376 Pawnee ol:o-State Office of Planning RichardsonanQ Programming
State Capitol Mid-Elkhorn Valley Council counties
Box 94601 of Governments Antelope
Lincoln 68509 P.O. Box 426 Madison

Norfolk 68701 PierceStanton AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
Wayne (Metropolitan) 
southwest Nebraska counties
Council of Governments Dundy
Clearinghouse P.O. Box 126 Hays

Jurisdiction McCook 	69001 
Hitchcock
Lincoln Red Willow 

Lincoln City-Lancaster County Lani:aster County Extra-Metropolitan Council counties
Planning commission of Governments ~
City Hall P.O. Box C cuming
Lincoln 68508 Fremont 68025 Dodge
Thurston
Omaha/Council Bluffs, Nebra/Iowa Washington 

omaha-council Bluffs Metropolitan 	Region 26 council Counties
Area Planning Agency 	Nebraska portion: Valley County Courthouse Blaine
Counties
7000 west center Road Douglas Ord 68862 custer
Omaha 68106 Garfield

Sarpy 
GreeleyIowa portion: 
Loup
~ 
Sherman
Pottawattamie 
Valley
Mills 
WheelerSioux City, Iowa/Neb./S.D. Cornhusker Regional council counties z 
Siouxland Interstate Metropolitan Iowa portion: of Governments ~ 	0
n...
Planning Council 	ll1 1 East Second Chase
P.. O. Box 447 	counties Ogallala 69153 GrantCherOkee m
626 Insurance Exchange Building 	l':eith
Ida 	lit
Sioux City, Iowa 51102 	Perkins
Monona
Plymouth
woodbury
Nebraska portion:
Dakota county
south Dakota portion!
union county 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES
(Other) 

Panhandle Resource Council 
counties
2402 Avenue T 
~
RFD 1, Box 1 
Box Butte
Scottsbluff 69361 
Cheyenne
Dawes
Deuel
Garden
Rimball
Morrill
scottsbluff
sheridan
Sioux 

Fort Kearney Council of Governments 	countiE-s
P.O. Box 489 
Buffalo
Kearney 688Q7 
Jll:earney 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
• 
NOTICES Pam 210-4 
.... 
.... 
Oo
-

0
-

~ 
a 
l ~ 
0 
z 
f'i
... 
...i 0 > 
E 

i•
... 
•c( Ill 
a 
~ 
F -69 

~ ......, 0  OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND .BUDGET CIRCULAR NO, A-95 (REVISED)STATF, M£TROPOLIT~,. AND REGIONAL CLI!!ARINGHOIJSES COLORADO ;STATF CLEARINGHOUSE Division of Planning Department of Local Affairs 1845 Sherman Stree~ Denver 80203  Colorado. cont'd Clearinghouse Colorado West council of Governments 229 West Avenue Box 351 Rifle 81650 Larimer~Weld Regional Planning Commission 20 1 East Fourth Street Loveland 80537  Jurisdiction counties Garfield Mesa Moffat Rio Blanco Counties Laiiiiir Weld  """a ~ .... c:> I ,j:>..  
Clearinghouse  AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan)  Jurisdiction  Hui:tfano-Las Animas Area council of Governments Las Animas County courthouse Trinidad 81082  Counties ~ t;as Animas  
Colorado springs Pikes Peak A~ea council of Governments 27 East Vermijo COlorado Springs 80903  counties El Paso Teller Park  Northwest Colorado council of Governments Holiday Center Building P.O. Box 737 Frisco soq~3  counties Eagle Grand Jackson Pitkin Routt summit  
~ Denver Regional council of GoVernments 1776 south Jackson Denver 80210 Pueblo Pueblo Area Council of Governments City Hall P.o. Box 1~27 Pueblo 81002  Counties ~ Arapahoe Boulder Clear Creek Douglas Gilpin Jefferson Denver Pueblo County  LOwer Arkansas Valley cOuncil of Governments County courthouse Las Animas 8105~ Opper Arkansas Area Council of Governments q2S-1/2 Main Street P.o. Box 510 canon City 81212  Counties saca-Bent Crowley ~iowa otero Provers counties Chaffee Custer Fremont Lake  z 0 :! n m en  
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other)  
san Luis Valley council of Governments Adams State College Box 28 Alamosa 81102  counties Alamosa Conejos Costilla Mineral Rio Grande saguache  
Northeastern Colorado Council of Governments P.O. Box 1782 Sterling 80751  Counties Logan ~organ Phillips Sedgwick washinqtonYuma - 
The District 10 Regional Planning Commission 107 South Cascade Box 3111 Montrose 81'101  counties ~ Gunnison Hinsdale MOntrose Ouray San Miguel  

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
• 

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO, A-95 (REVISID) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED)
STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES STATE, METROPOLITAN, ANt REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 

• 
~ NOJ!TH DAKOTA 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Research and Information North Dakota state Planninq Division 
Systems Division State CapitolDepartment of COmmunity Affairs Bismarck 58505 1Q2Q 9th Avenue Helena 59601 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan)
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Metropolitan) 
Clearinahouae_ Jurisdiction 

Clearinahouae Jurisdiction rargotMoorbead. N. o&k./Minn. 
Billings Parqo-MOorhead Metropolitan North Dakota portion:council of Governments case county
Billinte/Yellovatone City-county Yellowstone County QQ FOBS Lane Minnesota portion:Plarminq Board MOorhead, Minnesota 56560 Clay County 1t001n 303, ·coun~ courthouse Billinqa 59101 
9Jeat Palla 
Great Palla City-county Caecada County Plarminq Board 
P.o. Boll 1609 Great Palla 5,.03 
g 
6! 
"1 
-..J 
t-' l 
~ 
.... 
= 
•I 
FEDERAL I~ISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
rj 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISEDI " STATE, METROPOLITAN, ANC REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES south Dakota, cont'd ""0 
• 

'-..! 
SOUTH DAKOTA
i-:1 
STATE CLFARINGHOUSE 
State Planning Bureau 
State Capitol 
Pierre 57501 

AREAWIDE CLEAR~NGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Sioux City, Iowa/Neb./S.D. 
siouxland Interstate Metropolitan 
Planning Council 

P.o. Box 447 
Sioux City, Iowa 51103 
Sioux Falls 
South Eastern Council of Governments 
208 East 13th Street 
Sioux ·Falls 57102 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Otherl 
First Planning and 
Development District 
1101 First Avenue, N.E. 
watertown 57201 

Third Planning and 
Developtent District 

P.O. Box 687 
Yankton county courthouse 
Yankton 57078 

Jurisdiction 
Iowa portion: Counties Cherokee Ida Monona Plymouth Woodbury 
Nebraska portion: Dakota County south Dakota portion: Union County 
Counties 
a;;:y-
Lincoln 
MCCook 
Mennehaha 
Turner 
Union 

Counties 
Brooklnqs 
Codinqton 
Clark 
Deuel 
Grant 
Hamlin 
Kinqsbury 

Lake 
Miner 
Moody 

Counties 
~ 
Bon B"'"""' 
Brule 
Charles Mh 
Davison 
Douqlas 
Greqory 
RanSOn 
Jllltchinson 
Jerauld 
Sanborn 
Yankton 

Clearinghouse 
Fourth Planning and 
Development District 310 SOuth Lincoln Aberdeen 57QO 1 
Fifth Planning and 
Development District 365 1/2 South Pierre Street Pierre 57501 
Sixth Planning and Development District 
P.o. Box 1586 Rapid City. 57701 
Jurisdiction 

counties Beadle Brown Day Edmunds Falk Hand Marshall McPherson Roberts Spink 
counties BufTaTO Campbell Corson 
Dewey Gregory 

Raakon Hughes Hyde Jones Lyman Mellette 
Perkins 
Potter Stanley Sully Tripp 
Todd 
Walworth 
Ziebach 

counties Beii'iiett Butte Custer 
Fall River 
Harding Jackson LaWrence Meade 
Pennington 
Shannon Washabaugh 

e 

~ 
1-' Q 
,j:o.. 
z 
0 
.... 
n 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL IEGISTEI, VOL 4;l, NO. 6--MONDAY, JANUAIY 10, 1977 
n 


OFFICE OF MANAGEl'IENT AND BUDGET CIRCDLAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
~ 
STATE~LEARINGHODSE 
Utah Stat~ Planning COordinator Office of the Governor State Capitol Building Salt Lilke City 8Q1 14 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHODSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
salt Lake City, Ogden 
wasatch Front ~egional council '-2" West center street Bountiful 08Q010 
Provo/Orem 
Mountainland Asdociation of 
Govemment.s 
160 East center street 
Provo 8Q601 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (other) 
Bear River Association of Governments 160 North Main Logan 8Q321 
Six county commissioners 
organization 
Sevier County courthouse 
250 North Main 

P.O. Box 80Q 
Richfield 8Q701 

southeastern Utah 
Association of Governments 

P.o. Drawer A1 
109 s. Carbon Avenue 
Price 8Q501 

Five County Aesociation of 
Governments Organization 

P.O. Box 0 
1Q5 East 100 south 
st. Georqe 8Q770 

Uintah Basin Associ~tion 
of Governments · t,j Box 867 
26 west second North 
Roosevelt 9Q066 

-..,J 
\.1.) 
Jurisdiction 
counties 
~e 
Tooele 
Davis weber 
Morgan 
counties 
~ 
wasatch Summit 
counties 
Box Elder Cache Rich 
Counties 
~ 
Millard Sanpete Sevier 
Pinte Wayne 
Counties 
Carbon 
Emery Grand 
san Juan 
~ 
Beaver Garfield Iron 
J{ane 
washinqton 
countie-s Dagqett Duchesue Uintah 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED! STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
.~ 
STATE CLEARlNGHOUSE 
State Planning Coordina'tor Office of the Governor Capitol Building 
Cheyenne 82001 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
(No metropolitan areas) 
2 

n 
m 
"0 
a 
~ 
,_. 
= 
•I 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
t'%j 
~ 
a 
'-I 
~ 
~ 
~ 
<:> 
I ol:>o. 
R E G I 0 N IX 
Arizona 
California 
Hawaii 
Nevada 
z 
0 
:! 
n 
m 
"' 
n 

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
OPPICE OF MP.NAGEMENI' AND BIJDGI!T CIRCOLP.R NO. A-95 (REVISIID)
S'I"ATE, MIITROPOLITll!l, liND RIIGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 

ARIZONA 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
State Clearingbouee 
Office of EconOMic Planninq 
and Development 

State of Arizona 
1700 West Washington street 
Phoenix 8 5001 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOtiSEs 
(Metropolitan) 

Clearinghouse 
Jurbdictiou 
Phoenix 
Maricopa Association of Govern•ents Maricopa County 
1820 wee' Washington street 
Phoenix 85007 

Tucson 
Pima Association of Governmente Pima county 
~OS Transamerica Buildinq 
Tucson 85701 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Other) 

i§
Northern Arizona Council of Governments 	countiea 
P.O. Box 57 	Apache ... 
Flagstaff 86001 	Coconino 
n
Navajo 
Y~vapai 
= 
Central Arizona Association of Governments 	Countill 
Drawer JJ Gila 
512 Butte Avenue Pinal 
Florence e5232 

Southeastern Arizona Governments counties 
Association Greentee 

P.O. Box 20~ 	Cochise 
Bisbee 	85603 Graham 
santa Cruz 

District IV council of Governments 
~!!&! 
377 South Main Street 	Mohave 
Yuma 8536la 	Yuma 
Indian Tribal Clearinghouse Jurisdiction 
for Tribal Projects Salt Rive~-
Office of Manaqement and Program Indian Res-ervation 

Qevelopment 
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 
Community 
scottsdale 85256 

"':J 
....... 

Vl 
s '"C 
~ 
"""""
= 
of:>,.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

On"ICI: 01' IIIUIIIG!IIB'ftll AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) t'Zj III'A!'B, MnROPOLITAII, AIID REGIONAL CLEARIIIGBOOSES 
CALIFORHIA 
...... 
0\ 
STATE CLEARIHGHOUSE 
Office of tile Gcwernor 
Office of Planninq and Research 
1400 Tenth Street 
sacraooento 9511' 

AREAWIDE CLEARIHGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
ClearingbDII!! 	Jurisdiction 
Anahei!(Sagta Ana(Garden Grove. 
san An:l:at Oii:Ird/1/entura. and 

Be a n versid~Ontario 
Southern California Association 	Counties 
of Govern•nts Iaperial SUite 1000 Los Angeles 600 south ca..onwealth Avenue Orange 
Loa Anqelea 90005 	Riverside San Bernardino Ventura 
Bakersfield 
Kern County Copncil of GOvernments Kern County 1106 26th street Bakersfield 93301 
n
council of Fresno CoW"'ty Governments Fresno County 21 0' Tulare Street SUite 520 Fresno 9 3721 
~ 
Stanislaus Area Association of 	Stanislaus County 
GOvernaents 
8 n 14th street 
MOdesto 9525• 

sacra.ento 
Sacra.ento Regional Area Planninq counties Cowmission Eldorado (part)": 800 H Street Area west of Lake 
P.O. Box 808 	Tahoe basin 
Sacramento 9580' Placer (part) : Area west of Lake Tahoe basin 
sacramento sutter Yolo Yuba 
Salinas/Monterey 
Association of Monterey Bay Area Counties Governments MOri""terey 1011 C&SS Street San Benito 
P.o. Box 190 Santa Cruz Monterey 939.-l 
california. cont•d 
Clearinghouse 
san piego 
San Diego County Comprehensive 
Planning Organization security Pacific Plaza 1200 Third Avenue san Diego 92101 
san Francisco/oakland. San Jose, Valleio/Napa. and Santa Rosa 
Associaiton of Bay Area Governments Hote1 ClaretOOnt Berkeley 9'705 
santa Barbara 
Santa Barbara County-Cities Area 
Planning Council 
1306 Santa Barbara street 
Santa Barb~ra 93101 

Stock.ton 
san Joaquin county Council of Governments 1850 E. Hazelton Avenue Stockton 95205 
Jurisdiction 
San Diego County 
counties 
lt.].auoeda Contra Costa Marin Napa san Francisco San Mateo santa Clara Solano Sonoma 
Santa Barbara County 
san Joaquin county 
, 

a 
~ 
1-' 
= 
I 
~ 
z 
0 
::! 
n 
ftl
.,. 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42; NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
•

California, cont'd 
Clearinghouse 	Jurisdiction 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Other) 

Tahoe Regional Planning Agency california portion: 
P. o. Box 8896 Lake Tahoe Water Shed 
1052 Tat.a Lane Basin 
South Lake Tahoe 95731 Placer County (part) 

El Dorado county (part) 
Nevada 	portion: 
Lake Tahoe Water Shed 
Basin 
waahoe county (part) 
carson City 

The reqion aS a-whole 
includes th@ Tahoe 
baain, the perimeter of 
which ie approximately 
1o-12 miles from the· 

Shores of Lake Tahoe. 
Merced County Aesociation Merced county 
of Govern~nent.a 
759 west 22nd Street 

Merced 95340 
Tulare County Association 	Tulare County 
of Governments 
107 county courthouse 
Visalia 93277 

z 
0 
-t 
n 
m 
VI 
"%j 
'-I 
...... 
; 

~ 
1-' 
Q 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 	""' 
"Zj 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCiJLAR NO. A-95 (REVISED) '"0 STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES STATE, METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
...... 
a 
NEVADA
.!!!!!M! N 
.... 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSESTATE CLEARINGHOUSE = 
•I 
Department of Planning and Econ~c State Flanninq Coordinator Development. 
State Capital Building 
P.O. Box 2359 Carson City 89101 Honolulu 96804 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 

(Metropolitan) 
(lletropolitan) 

Clearinghouse .Jurisdict.ion Honolulu 
~.!LY~ City and Coma~y of Hololulu Depart.~~tent. Honolulu County 
clark county Regional Planning Council Clark County
of General Planning 6SO south Kinq Street 
County court. House Annex Honolulu 96813 
Las Veqas 89101 
~~ 
washoe council of Govern.ents Washoe county STATE CLEARINGHOUSE P.O. Box 3516 JSO south Center Street Reno 89505 state Clearinqhouse Office of the Lieutenant Governor Aqana 96910 
AREAWIDE·CLEARINGHOUSES (other) 
Tahoe Reqional Planning Agency California portion: 
P.O. Box 8896 counties 1052 Tata Lane 
P'IiCer(part) 
g
South Lake Tahoe, California 95731 El Dorado· (part) 
Nevada portion: 
n 
~ 
DOUglas (part) 
Washoe (part) = 
Carson city (part) 
The region aS a Wh~e includes the Tahoe basin# the perimeter of which is approximate} y 10-12 miles from the Shores of Lake Tahoe. 
carson River. Basin Carson City Council of Govern~ents Counties 
P.O. Bt;x 1927 Churchill Carson City 89761 Douglas 
Lyor. 
Storey 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 10, 1977
42, .ONDAY, JANUARY 
• 

REGION X 
Alaska 
Idaho 
Oreqon 
Washin9tor. 
~ 
;;-t m 
Cll 
"'EJ 
....... 

\0 
t.:l 
.... 
• 0 
I 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT A!OD EUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED} 
"':i  .  STATE,  METROPOLITAN,  AND  REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES  
co 0  ~ STATE CLEARINGHOUSE  
Office of th~ Governor state of Alaska Pouch AD state Capital Juneau 99801  
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan)  
Clearinghouse  Jurisdiction  
Anchorage  
A-95 Coordinator Office of the Municipal Manager Municipality of Anchorage Pouch 6-650 Anchorage 99501  Greater Anchorage  ~ea  

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR 1<0. A-95 (REVISED} loQ S~TE. METROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLF~~rNGHOUSES I= 
State clearinghouse Division of Budget, 
and coordination 122 Statehouse Boise 83120 
Clearinahouse 
~ ~ 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Policy Planning 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan} 
Ada Counci 1 of Governments 
525 w. Jefferson Street Boise 8H02 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Other} 
Panhandle Planning and Development Council 
P.O. Box 880 Coeur d'Alene 83814 
southeastern Idaho council 
of Governments Box 4169 40 3 North Main Pocatello 83201 
Ida-Ore Regional Planning and Development Association 
Box 311 25 West Idaho street Weiser 83672 
Magic Valley Council of 
Governments QO 1 South Lincoln Jerome 83 338 
Clearwater Economic Development Association 
P.O. Box 8636 Moscow 838113 
DAY, JANUARY 10, 1977
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, 
Jurisdiction 
Ada county 
Counties aenewat1 Boundary 
Bonn<l?!r 
Kootenai 
Shoshone 
counties 
Bannock 
Bear Lake 
Bingham 
Caribou 
Franklin 
Oneida 
Power 
Counties 
~ 
Adams Boise Canyon Elmore Gem Payette owyhee Valley Washington 
Counties 
Blaine 
Camas 
Cassia 
Gooding 
Jerome 
Lincoln 
Minidoka 
Twin Falls 
Counties Clearwater Idaho Latah Lewis Nez Perce 
~ ~ 
Q 
~ 
~ 
-t 
n 
m 
"' 
OFFICE OF MANAGEIIENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (REVISED)STATE, OIETROPOLITAN, AND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES 
Oregon. cont•c! 
.Q!!m2!! 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
Federal Aid coordinator 
Interqovern~ental Relations Division Executive Department 2'0 cottage Street s. E. 
Sale• 97310 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (Metropolitan) 
Clearinghouse 
Eugene 
Lane Counci1 of Governmenta 
135 6th Avenue East 
EUqene 97401 

Portland, ore./Wash. 
Columbia Region Association 
of Gavernmen.t a 
527 s. w. Hall Street 
University Center Building 
Portland 9120 1 

Salem 
Mid Willamette Valley council 
of Governments 
Senator Building 
220 Hiqh Street, N. E. 
Salem 97 301 

AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES (other) 
Blue Mountain Intergovernmental council wallowa county courthouse Entt:!rprise 9782R 
Central oregon Intergovernmental council 
P.O. Box 575 
1106 West Highland Avenue 
Redmond 91756 
Clatsop-Tillamook Intergovernmental council 
P.o. Box Q88 
cannon Beach 97110 

coos-curry council of Governments 
1975 McPherson 
P.O. Box 6Q7 
North Bend 97ltS9 
l"lj 
~id-Columbia Economic 
Development District 

P.O. Box 280 
502 E. Fifth Street. Annex 8 1-' 
00 
The Dalles 97058 
Jurisdiction 
Lane County 
Oregon eortion : 
counties 

Clackamas 
Columbia 
Multnomah 
Washington washington portion: 
Clark County 
counties 
MiriOi\ 
Polk 
Yamill 
Counties 
Baker 
Union 
Wallowa 
counties 
~n 
Deschutes 
Cook 
Counties Clatsop 
Tillamook 
Counties 
coos--
Curry 
counties Rood River Sherman 
Wasco 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 
Clearinghouse 
Rogue valley council of Govermnents Suite 211 33 North Centr.al Medford 97501 
sout~east Oreqon council of GoVernments 
P.O. Box 799 ' 
71 s.w. second Avenue Ontario 9791Q 
District Q Council of Governments Q60 s.w. Madison corvallis 97330 
East Central Oregon Association of counties 
P.o. Box 339 920 s.w. Frazier Pendleton 97801 
Umpqua Reqional Council of Governments oouqlas county courthouse Annex 205 s. E. Jackson street Roseburq 97Q70 
Xlamath Lake Planning and 
coordinating council Lake county courthouse Lakeview 97630 

•

Jurisdiction 
counties JaCkSOi\ 
Josephine 
Counties 

BariieY 
flllalheur 
counties 
~ 
Lincoln Linn 
counties Gilliam Grant Morrow Ullliltilla Wbeeler 
Douqlas County 
Counties !Ualllilth Lake 

z 
0
... 

;:; 
m 
"' 
'"C 
a 
~ 
.... 
Q 
~
42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 


l'%j 
OFFICI!! OP MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR NO. A-95 (RI!!VISI!!D)STATE, METROPOLITAN, liND REGIONAL CLEARINGHOUSES Washington. cont'd 
()) Clearinghouse !'..) 
WASHINGTON cowlit~-wahkiakum Governmental Conference 
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE 
103 North Fifth Avenue Kelso 98626 
Office of the Governor 
Douqles County Regional Planning
Office of Program Planning and 
CommissionFiseal Management 
110 Third street N.l!!.
Olympia 9850G ~st Wenatchee 98801 
Grant-Lincoln-Adams conference 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
of Governments 
(Metropolitan) Grant County Planning Department Courthouse Ephrata 98823 
Clearinghouse Jurisdiction Grays Harbor Regional Planning
Portla.nd, ore./Wash. 
couunission 207 1/2 East Market street
columbia Region Association of Oregon portion: Aberdeen 98520
Governments counties 
5~7 s.w. R~ll Street 

Clackamas Island county Planning Department
University Center Building Columbia P.o. Box 698Portland, Oregon 97201 
Multnomah coupeville 98239 washington Washington oortion: Jefferson-Port Townsend Clark County Regional council county Courthouse 
Seattle/Everett and Tacoma 
Po'it Townsend 98368 
PUget sound Governmental· conference counties 
Kittitas county council 
216 First Avenue South 
~ of GOVernments 
Seattle 98104 
Kitsap 217 county courthouse Pierce. Ellensburg 98926 
Snohomish Klickitat Comty Regional Planning
Spokane 
Council 
P. o. Box 1515
Spokane Regional Planning conference Spokane County Goldendale 
98620
221 Wall Street -City Hall 
Spokane 99201 

Lewis Regional Planning COmmission 
P.O. Box G18 
Yakima 
Chehalis 98532 
Yakima county Conference Jurisdiction Mason. Regional Planning councilof Governments Yakima county P.o. Box 186417 County courthouse 
Shel4:on 9858G
Yakima 98901 
okanogan co~mty Regional PlanningRichland-~ennewick 
Commission 
P.o. Box 1009
Benton-Franklin Governmental counties 
Okanogan 988G o
conference Bei\tOil 
906 Jadwin Avenue Franklin 

Pacific County Regional Planning
Richland 99 352 
council courthouse P.o. Box 66 SOuth Bend 98586 
AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSES 
(Other) 

san Juan county Planning Departaent 
P.o. Box gq?
Clearinghouse Friday Harbor 98250 
Chelan country Regional Planning Jurisdiction Skkqit Regional Planning
Council Chelan County 

Councilq11 Washington Street 120 West Kincaid Street
Wenatchee 98801 Mt. Vernon 98273 
Clallam County Governmental Clallam County Skamania Reqional Planninq councilConference 
P.O. Box 30 
P.O. Box Q30 
County Courthouse AnnexPort Angeles 98362 stevenson 986"8 
Jurisdiction 
counties
c;;;mz 
WahkiakWft 
Douglas County 
~ 
Adams 
Grant 
Lincoln 
Grays Harbor County 
Island County Jefferson County 
Kittitas County 
Rlickitat County 
Lewis COID\ty 
Mason County Okanogan County 
Pacific County 
San Juan County 
Skagit County; 
Skamania county 
• 

; 

N 
.... 
= 
•I 
z 
0 
....
;:; 
m 
"' 
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 6-MONDAY, JANUARY 10, 1977 

Washington. cont'd 
Clearinghouse 
Thurston Reqional Planning 
council 
332 County courthouse Annex 
Olympia 98501 
TRICO Economic Development 
District North 470 Main Mail Box 21Q Colville 9911Q 
Walla walla Regional Planningcommission 
P.O. Box «170 Third and Rose Street Walla Walla 99362 
Whatcom county council of 
Governments Whatcom county courthouse 311 Grand Avenue Bellingham 98225 
Whitman County Regional Planningcouncil 
P.o. Box 208 Colfax 99111 
Asotin County Planning Commission 
P.o. Box 61 Asotin 99Q02 
Regional Planning council of Clark county 
P.O ••Box 500 Vancouver 98663 
•counties follow~d by an asterisk are witllin a 
clearinghouse jurisdiction also. Therefore,counties will be sent to both clearinghouses. 
Jurisdiction 
Thurston County 
counties 
Ferry 
Pend Oreille 
Stevens 

~ 
Walla Walla 
Columl::ia 

Whatcon1 county 
Whitman county 
Counties 
~ 
Garfield 
Clark County* 
z 
0
metropolitan areawide notific~tion from ~hese 
""" 
n 
m 
"' 
[FR Doc.77-738 Filed 1-7-77;8:45 a.m[ 
"'J 00  ;  
w  ~  
....  
=  
FEDERAL  REGISTER,  VOL.  42,  NO.  6-MONDAY,  JANUARY  10,  1977  I...  

• 

• 

Pam 210-4 
The proponent agency of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) direct to HQDA (DAEN-MCP-A) WASH DC 20314. 
By Order of the Secretary of the Army: 
BERNARD W. ROGERS 
Official:  General,  United States Chief of Staff  Army  
PAUL T. SMITH  
Major  General, United States The Adjutant General  Army  

DISTRIBUTION: 
To be distributed in accordance with DA Fonn 12-9A requirements for DA Pamphlets, Installations. Active Army: C (CONUS, USARAL, USARHAW, USARSO) ARNG:A USAR: D 
-It U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 19"/7 241-379/3305 
•