ee re ate gts ied oc raul pipeeil ae ee Bahia BAER f Hy a Haha eee i alte GEL Leesdehed Cet LeeLee ak EAU CCL eR ieee 2 aoe i i - ie t i i if eA Bs ase , Revi Ee i a ieee 4 : Fe eee see ae a 4 : He Sees poseeecececeeeere : Seaeas Senge Soca remem rare nan tne AR BEES ue Site eee ee 3 z Soest SST Spots SSe SSS SESS SE SS SSS SSS SES SSS SSS SSS. ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY New York STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND HoME ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY The birds of Indiana; a descriptive catal THE BIRDS OF INDIANA. A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE OF THE BIRDS THAT HAVE BEEN OBSERVED WITHIN THE STATE, WITH AN ACCOUNT OF THEIR HABITS. By AMOS W. BUTLER. INTRODUCTION. At the request of Prof. W. 8. Blatchley, the chief of the Department of Geology and Natural Resources, I have undertaken the preparation of a report upon the birds of Indiana. This is made necessary by the fact that Dr. A. W. Brayton’s “Catalogue of the Birds of Indiana,” published in 1879, has long been out of print and the supply of my own catalogue of 1890 is practically exhausted. Both of these papers were published by the Indiana Horticultural Society. With the increasing interest in the relations of birds to the farm, orchard, garden and lawn; with the attention that has of late been directed to birds as subjects for nature study in all our schools and with the awakening desire to prevent the slaughter of native beneficial birds, for purposes of decoration and adornment, has come a demand for information relating to the birds about us that is unsupplied. It is desired that I give at this time an account of the occurrence, distribution, breeding range, nesting habits and foods of the birds of the State, to which shall be added descriptions of all the species that occur within our limits and an artificial key to aid in their determina- tion. With the material available, the result of over twenty-one years’ observations on the migrations of birds within the State of Indiana, it was to have been hoped that the way might have opened for some extended consideration of the data at hand. I have been enabled 516 Report OF STATE GEOLOGIST. to illustrate slightly the movements of birds generally, giving the ear- liest and latest dates as indicating the two extremes of the migratory periods as they are known to us. It is to be hoped that at an early date at least one volume will appear, giving some of the more impor- tant results of the observations that have been made. While this report is based largely upon my notes, made principally in southeastern Indiana within the past twenty-one years, I have also had the benefit of the material that has come into my hands as the curator of the Department of Ornithology of the Indiana Academy of Science. Dr. C.-Hart Merriam, chief of the Biological Survey of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, has very kindly afforded me facil- ities for examining the migration reports in his office from Indiana for a series of years. He has also arranged to supply such cuts as are in the possession of that department for the purpose of illustrating this report. I have been favored with the assistance of Mr. Robert Ridgway, curator of the Department of Birds of the United States National Museum; Dr. J. A. Allen, American Museum of Natural History, New York; Dr. F. W. Langdon, Mr. Charles Dury, Mr. H. W. McBride, Cincinnati, O.; Mr. Ruthven Deane, Mr. H. K. Coale, Mr. J. G. Par- ker, Jr., Mr. F. M. Woodruff, Chicago, Ill; Mr. E. R. Quick, Brook- ville, Ind.; Mr. C. E. Aiken, Salt Lake City, Utah; Mr. Jerome Trombley, Petersburg, Mich.; Mr. L. Whitney Watkins, Manchester, Mich.; Prof. B. W. Evermann, Icthyologist, U. S. Fish Commission, Washington, D. C.; Prof. W. 8. Blatchley, Dr. A. W. Brayton and Hon. R. Wes. McBride, Indianapolis, Ind., and also of Mrs. Jane L. Hine, Sedan; Mr. E. J. Chansler, Bicknell; Messrs. L. A. and C. D. Test, Lafayette; Prof. H. S. Voorhees, Brookville, and Miss Lulu Ward, Milton, and of a great number of patient investigators who, for the love of nature and the desire to advance knowledge, have made careful observations and submitted valuable reports. Towards the end of this paper I have attempted to mention them by name, and I sin- cerely hope I have omitted none. To each one I extend my thanks for the assistance rendered. In addition the J. B. Lippincott Company have kindly given me permission to make use of the keys in Ridgway’s Manual of North American Birds. A. C. McClung & Company have granted the same permission regarding Dr. Jordan’s Manual of Vertebrates, and Dr. Elliott Coues has authorized me to make use of his Key to North American Birds. I am indeed thankful for the courtesy ex- tended by the persons interested in these valuable works. I have availed myself of the opportunity, and from them have gathered much Birps oF INDIANA. 517 of the material for the keys and descriptions found herein. In addi- tion I have consulted Dr. Wheaton’s Birds of Ohio, Mr. McI]wraith’s Birds of Ontario, Prof. Cook’s Birds of Michigan, Mr. Ridgway’s Birds of Illinois, Dr. Hatch’s Birds of Minnesota, Dr. Warren’s Birds of Pennsylvania, Mr. Chapman’s Birds of Eastern North America, Maj. Bendire’s Life Histories of North American Birds, Mr. Nehrling’s North American Birds, the reports of Professors King and Forbes on the food of birds, and numerous other publications, from all of which I have used more or less material. For this I desire to acknowledge my indebtedness to those authors and to others to whose works reference is made herein. It has been my purpose not to include within this list any bird which has not been ascertained to occur within the State and not to note any species as having bred unless I have been satisfied upon good authority that it has done so. JI have added a supplemental list of species which, from their having been taken near our limits, may, wiih greater or less probability, be expected to be found within the State. THE INDIANA BIRD LAW. In 1891 the Legislature, at the request of the Indiana Academy of Science and the Indiana Horticultural Society, enacted the following law for the protection of our native beneficial birds: “AN ACT for the protection of birds, their nests and eggs. (Approved March 5, 1891.) “Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana, That it shall be unlawful for any person to kill any wild bird other than a game bird or purchase, offer for sale any such wild bird after it has been killed, or to destroy the nests or the eggs of any wild bird. “Sec. 2. For the purpose of this act the following shall be considered game birds: the Anatide, commonly called swans, geese, brant, and river and sea ducks; the Rallidse, commonly known as rails, coots, mud hens, and gallinules; the Limicole, commonly known as shore birds, plovers, surf birds, snipe, woodcock, and sandpipers, tattlers, and cur- lews; the Galline, commonly known as wild turkeys, grouse, prairie chickens, quail, and pheasants, all of which are not intended to be af- fected by this act. “Sec. 3. Any person violating the provisions of section 1 of this act shall, upon conviction, be fined in a sum not less than ten nor more than fifty dollars, to which may be added imprisonment for not less than five days nor more than thirty days. “See. 4. Sections 1 and 2 of this act shall not apply to any person hold- ing a permit giving the right to take birds or their nests and eggs for scientific purposes, as provided in secton 5 of this act. 518 Report oF STATE GEOLOGIST. “Sec. 5. Permits may be granted by the Executive Board of the Indi- ana Academy of Science to any properly acrcedited person, permitting the holder thereof to collect birds, their nests or eggs for strictly scientific purposes. In order to obtain such permit the applicant for the same must present to said Board written testimonials from two well known scientific ‘men certifying to the good character and fitness of said applicant to be entrusted with such privilege, and pay to said Board one dollar to defray the necessary expenses attending the granting of such permit, and must file with said Board a properly executed bond in the sum of two hundred dollars, signed by at least two responsible citizens of the State as sure- ties. The bond shall be forfeited to the State and the permit become void upon proof that the holder of such permit has killed any bird or taken the nests or eggs of any bird for any other purpose than that named in this section, and shall further be subject for each offense to the penalties provided in this act. oo ete, 2 “Sec. 6. The permits authorized | by this act shall be in force for two years only from the date of their’ ighik ‘and shall not be transferable. “Sec. 7. The Hnglish or European house sparrow (Passer domesticus), crows, hawks, and other birds of prey are not included among the birds protected by this act. “Sec. 8. All acts or parts of acts heretofore passed in conflict with the provisions of this act are hereby repealed. “Sec. 9. An emergency is declared to exist for the immediate taking effect of this act, therefore the same shall be in force and effect from and after its passage.” In some localities this law has been enforced, but presumably in others it is not well known. It is to be hoped that our citizens will familiarize themselves with it to the end that it may be made efficient throughout the Commonwealth. POSITION AND BOUNDARY. The following is an accvunt of the location and physical features of Indiana. The quotations are from Dr. Charles R. Dryer’s “Studies in Indiana Geography:” “Tndiana is one of the North Central States, situated in what is sometimes called the Middle West, between the upper Great Lakes and the Ohio, and mostly in the Mississipni basin. The central par- allel of the United States, the 39th, crosses its southern third and it is included between 37 degrees +1 minutes and 41 degrees 46 minutes north latitude, and between 84 degrees 44 minutes and 88 degrees 6 minutes west longitude. It is bounded on the north by the parallel which is ten miles north of the southern extremity of Lake Michigan; on the east by the meridian of the mouth of the Great Miami River; on the south by the Ohio, and on the west by the Wabash river and the meridian of Vincennes. Its extreme length is 250 miles. its av- erage width 145 miles, its area 36,350 square miles. Brrps or INDIANA. 519 ELEVATION. “According to Powell’s division of the United States into ‘physio- graphic regions, Indiana lies mostly on the Ice Plains, but includes a small portion of the Lake Plains on the north and of the Alleghany Plateau on the southeast. The highest land in the State, in southern Randolph county, is 1,285 feet above tide; the lowest, at the south- west corner is 313 feet. The area above 1,000 feet comprises 2,850 square miles, in three tracts: (1) An irregular area around the head- waters of the Whitewater river, in Union, Wayne, Randolph, Dela- ware, Henry, Rush, Decatur, Franklin and Ripley counties;* (2) a narrow crescentic ridge in Brown county; (3) a considerable area in Steuben, DeKalb, Noble and Lagrange counties. Isolated peaks rise in Brown county to 1,172 feet and in Steuben to 1,200 feet. The area between 500 and 1,000 feet in elevation is 28,800 square miles and that below 500 feet is 4,700 square miles. The average elevation of the state is 700 feet. * * * * * PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS. “The most striking physical contrast in Indiana is that between the glaciated and‘ unglaciated areas. A comparison of the topographic map with that showing the revised glacial boundary brings out this contrast sharply. North of the limit of drift the contour lines run in large curves and are far apart, showing the general smoothness and monotony of the surface. South of the glacial boundary the lines are crowded and extremely tortuous, showing a surface much cut up. The limit of drift incloses and fits this area of broken surface as a man’s coat fits his shoulders. “The Ohio Slope—That portion of the State which slopes directly to the Ohio, ineluding the driftless area and the southeastern part of the drift plain, is a region of deep, narrow valleys, bounded by precipitous bluffs and separated by sharp, irregular divides. Isolated knobs and buttes are numerous; the crests and summits are from 300 to 500 feet above the valley bottoms. The streams are rapid and broken by frequent cataracts. All open out into the Ohio Valley, a trench from one to six miles wide, 400 feet deep and bounded by steep bluffs. “The Central Plain—North of an irregular line extending in a general direction from Richmond to Terre Haute, and south of the westward flowing portion of the Wabash from Fort Wayne to Attica, * Also Fayette and a part of Dearborn. 520 Report oF STATE GEOLOGIST. the topography is that of an almost featureless drift plain. It is traversed by numerous morainic ridges, but they are low and incon- spicuous. The traveler may ride upon the railway train for hours without seeing a greater elevation than a hay stack or a pile of saw- dust. The divides are flat and sometimes swampy, the streams muddy and sluggish. The valleys begin on the uplands as scarcely percepti- ble grooves in the compact boulder clay, widen much more rapidly than they deepen and seldom reach down to the rock floor. “The Northern Plain—The portion of the drift plain north of the Wabash river is more varied than the central plain, and comprises several regions which differ materially in character. A small area around the head of Lake Michigan is occupied by sand ridges and dunes, partly due to a former extension of the lake and partly to present wind action. Some of the drifting dunes are more than 100 ‘feet high. This region is separated by a belt of morainic hills from the basin of the Kankakee, which contains the most extensive marshes and prairies in the State. This region also is traversed by numerous low ridges of sand, the origin and character of which are not yet well understood. Many of its features are probably due to the fact that during the retreat of the ice-sheet it was temporarily occupied by a glacial lake, which received the wash from the high moraines to the eastward. Northeastern Indiana is the region of high moraines, and has a strongly marked character of its own. A massive ridge of drift, 25 miles wide, 100 miles long and from 200 to 500 feet thick, extends from Steuben County to Cass County and is joined by several smaller branches from'the northwest. This is the joint moraine of the Erie and Saginaw lobes of the Laurentide glacier. Much of its surface is extremely irregular, presenting a succession of rounded domes, conical peaks, and winding ridges, with hollows of corresponding shape be- tween, which are occupied by innumerable lakes and marshes; the highest points are 100 to 300 feet above the level intermorainic inter- vals. A large proportion of the material is sand and gravel. A small area in eastern Allen County is a part of the bed of the glacial Lake Maumee. DRAINAGE. “The general slope of Indiana is to the southwest, as indicated by the course of the Wabash River and its tributaries, which drain two- thirds of the State. Of the remaining third one-half is drained di- rectly to the Ohio and one-half to Lakes Erie and Michigan and to the Mississippi through the Ilinois. Birps oF INDIANA. 521 “The Wabash River is the great artery of Indiana, which it traverses for more than 400 miles. The fall is quite uniformly about eighteen inches per mile. Its current is gentle and unbroken by notable rapids or falls. Its valley is quite varied in character. Above Huntington it is a young valley, without bluffs, terraces or flood plain. Below Hunt- ington it once carried the drainage of the upper Maumee Basin, and is nowhere less than a mile wide as far down as Attica. Below that point its width varies from two to six miles. The original valley has been largely filled with drift, which the present river has been unable to clear out. It winds between extensive terraces of gravel, which border it at various elevations, and flows at a level from 50 to 100 feet above the original rock floor.. Below Terre Haute, the wide flood plain, ox-bow bends and bayous give it a character similar to that of the lower Mississippi. The upper tributaries as far down as Lafayette are post-glacial streams in drift valleys, whose courses are largely deter- mined by the trend of the moraines. Below that point the smaller tributaries enter the river through picturesque sandstone gorges. “White River, the largest tributary of the Wabash, and rivaling it in volume of discharge, is a much more varied and complex stream. The larger West Fork rises at the summit level of the state in Randolph county. In its upper course it is moraine-guided, like the upper trib- utaries of the Wabash, and presents the same characters as the other streams of the central plain. In Morgan county it assumes a different aspect, and thence to its mouth flows through a valley from one to three miles wide, 100 to 300 feet deep, bordered by wide bottoms. The East Fork rises on the same elevation as the West, but reaches its destination by a more tortuous course. Although its length is in- creased and its slope decreased by its numerous meanders, it is still a swift stream. Both forks of White river suffered many disturbances during the glacial period, which have not yet been studied in detail, but are obvious from the varying character of their valleys and from the terraces which border them at all heights up to 300 feet. “The Whitewater River takes the shortest course of all from the sum- mit level to the Ohio, and its average fall is about seven feet to the mile. At Richmond it has cut a narrow gorge into the soft shales 100 feet deep. In strongest contrast with this and the other rivers of the Ohio Slope is the Kankakee, which winds through wide marshes with a scarcely perceptible current and without definite banks. Its basin, however, is sufficiently elevated to render good drainage possi- ble by the construction of the requisite ditches, and much has already been done to that end. 522 REPORT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES. “Many important land forms are wanting in Indiana. There are no mountains, no valleys formed by upheaval or subsidence, no volcanoes or voleanic rocks except foreign fragments brought by the ice sheet, no features due to disturbance of the earth crust except the rock foun- dations of the State itself. “Plains.—As already indicated, the greater part of Indiana is a plain of accumulation; the surface of a sheet of glacial drift which varies in thickness from a few feet to 500 feet or more. The average thickness is more than 100 feet. It consists chiefly of a mass of clay containing more or less gravel and boulders—the til] or boulder clay of the geol-. ogists. This is locally varied by ‘heaps, ridges, sheets and pockets of sand and gravel, and in the southern part of the State is overlain by a peculiar fine silt called loess. The boulder clay is the grist of the glacial mill, and is composed of a very intimate and heterogeneous mixture of native and foreign materials, containing fragments of almost every. known mineral and rock. The large fragments, or boulders, are widely distributed, and of évery size up to 30 feet in di- ameter. They are nearly all igneous or metamorphic in character and can be traced back to their origin in the Canadian highlands north of the Great Lakes. “The driftless area is a plain of degradation, formed by the removal of the original rock surface to an unknown depth, and now repre- sented by the somes of the flat and even-topped divides, ridges and hills. _ “Hills—On the northern plain occur numerous hills of accumula- tion forming the great morainic belts, the result of excessive dumping and heaping up of drift along the margins and between the lobes of the melting ice-sheet. The most impressive examples are found in Steuben, Lagrange, Noble and Kosciusko counties, where they attain a height of 200 feet or more, and are as steep and sharp as the mate- rials will lie. Their peculiar forms and tumultuous arrangement give a striking and picturesque character to the landscape. “The Qhio Slope is studded all over with hills of degradation—blocks and fragments of the original plain left by the cutting out of the valleys between them. Some are broad and flat-topped, some narrow, crooked and level-crested, some sharp or rounded, isolated knobs or buttes. These are very conspicuous in the counties of Greene, Da- viess, Martin, Crawford, Orange, Washington and Jackson, but attain their greatest development in Floyd, Clark and Scott, where the Silver Hills and Guinea Hills rise to 400 and 500 feet above the valley Brrps oF INDIANA. 523 bottoms. In Brown County the knob topography attains the highest absolute elevation in Weed Patch Hill, and the surrounding region is so rugged as to have gained the title of the “Switzerland of Indiana.’ “In Benton county Mounts Nebo and Gilboa are isolated masses of rock projecting above the general level of the plain, and are probably entitled to the name of monadnocks. % * * * * * * “Lakes.—The surface of the northern plain is peppered with small lakes which occupy irregular depressions in the surface of the: drift, and are especially characteristic of the massive moraines. The whole number cannot be less than 1,000. The largest, Turkey Lake in Kos- ciusko county, has an area of five and a half square miles. “Marshes and Swamps.—These exceed the lakes in number and extent. The smaller ones are the basins of former lakes which have been filled up with sediment and vegetation. The largest are in the Kankakee Basin, and are the remaining vestiges of a glacial lake. Everywhere over the central plain the divides are too flat and the slopes too gentle for good drainage, and marshes abound. These, however, have been largely drained by ditches.” The surface of the State presents considerable differences in its vegetation. The heaviest timber which was found in central ani southern Indiana has for the greater part disappeared. Throughout the northern part of the State the number of large trees is much less and the general size of forest trees decreases noticeably as one proceeds northward. “Contrary to the statements made in many books, Indiana is not a prairie state. An area estimated to comprise one-eighth of the whole, situated, except a few isolated patches in the northwestern part, is marsh and upland prairie. The remainder of the State was orig- inally covered by a heavy growth of oak, walnut, beech, maple and other hardwood timber, with sycamore and poplar near the streams and a little pine along the Ohio slope. No region in the United States could show finer specimens or a greater number of individuals and species of forest trees than the lower Wabash Valley. The same region is said to be the original habitat of the bluegrass which has made Indiana and Kentucky pastures so famous.” (Dryer, p. 25.) 524 REporT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. PECULIARITIES AFFECTING BIRD DISTRIBUTION. The region about the southern end of Lake Michigan presents an unusually fertile field for the ornithologist. Situated as it is, midway between the wooded region of the East and the treeless plains of the West, with the warm river bottoms of the South, rich in southern species, extending to within a comparatively shor’ distance, and the great lake upon the north, northwestern Indiana forms a kind of “four corners” where the avian faune of four regions intergrade. To the proximity of Lake Michigan we are indebted for a number of more or less strictly maritime species. As would be expected the southern species occur only in summer, with the exception of Lophophanes bicolor, which is found only in winter. Not only is the influence of the lake upon the faunz shown by the occurrence of numerous species of birds, attracted by the presence of a large body of water, with its congenial surroundings, but the influence of the lake upon the climate and the vegetation in its immediate vicinity has a marked influence upon the list of summer residents. The northwestern portion of the State is divided into alternating tracts of prairie, marsh and wood- land, each possessing a bird life of its own. In Lake County, along the Lake Shore, is a stretch of pine woods known as “the pinery,” which is quite peculiar. (Condensed from HE. W. Nelson’s notes of “Birds of Northeastern Illinois.”) Coming south one crosses the Kan- kakee River and marshes, well-known regions for water fowl and marsh-inhabiting birds, and enters the Wabash Valley. Back from this valley proper we find occasional prairies and extensive meadows, where such prairie-inhabiting forms as Henslow’s Sparrows, Yellow- winged Sparrows, Black-throated Buntings and Prairie Larks are ex- pected to be found. The lower Wabash Valley is noted for its extended “bottom lands” and “cypress swamps,” which, for their flora no less than their birds, are of much interest. The amount of bird life here in summer is very much in excess of that in the north- western corner of the State at that season. The difference in the num- ber of birds noted would be readily observed. In the southeastern part of the State the land rises in some places almost 400 feet above the Ohio River within a mile or very little more. On leaving the fertile river bottoms, with their successive terraces, one ascends the steep river hills and soon reaches the wet flats where the drainave is so poor that the water stands upon the surface beneath the oak and beech timber the greater part of the year. There is an intimate relation be- tween the topography and the character of the soil here. There is a Birps oF INDIANA. 525 comparatively level plateau extending from the Ohio River “bluffs” to the northward, west of the valley of the Whitewater, and forming the water shed of a number of streams, some running into the White- water and some into the White River. This surface soil is usually a white or gray clay, characteristic of the country within 30 miles of the Ohio River in the southeastern corner of the State. From this one de- scends until the “broken uplands” are found lying just below the level land. Still lower down the “hillsides” are reached. These rise more or less abruptly from the bottom lands. The prevailing timber of this region is oak, maple, beech, sweet gum, black gum, etc., and with them are found, each in its season, some birds which prefer these surround- ings—Summer Redbird, Cape May Warbler, Black-throated Blue War- bler, etc. East of the Whitewater River to beyond the Ohio line the country is more level and the soil darker and more fertile, the land ranking with the best in the State. The central portion of the State is comparatively level and very fertile. It was more recently settled than the southeastern portion, and hence to-day there may still be seen among the finest farms specimens of the largest trees to be found upon Indiana soil. The northeastern part of the State has been but little explored by the zoologist. Doubtless it will prove a valuable field for the one who will occupy it. This is the “lake region” of Indiana. Within this quarter is the meeting of two drainage systems—the Wa- bash to the southwest and the St. Joseph and St. Mary’s to the north- east. The Wabash River is the line of principal migration in Indiana. As it turns to the eastward many routes leave it for the north, par- ticularly just south of Lake Michigan, but many birds follow its course along its length: ‘To this fact seems to be due the peculiar distribu- tion of such forms as the Prothonotary and Cerulean Warblers, and in less degree the Kentucky, Worm-eating and Sycamore Warblers. CHANGES IN BIRD-LIFE. When our race first viewed this region it was a vast forest, a wilder- ness, unbroken save by the water courses, the trail of the Indian, the runways of the deer, the roadways of the buffalo. Our birds were only such as frequented the densest woodland or the bars in the river chan- nels, together with forms of wide range and birds of passage. With the cutting away of the larger trees sprang up thickets, and therewith came thicket-inhabiting forms. As the clearings were extended meadow lands and pasture lands were reserved. To the meadows came such forms as the Bay-winged Bunting, Field Sparrow, Black-throated Bunting and Grasshopper Sparrow, species peculiar to such surround- ings. Some parts of this land were wet and, where the drainage was 526 Report oF STATE GEOLOGIST. not good, became swamps and sloughs. There birds peculiar to such localities settled, among them Marsh Wrens, Rails, Gallinules, Swamp Sparrows and Red-winged Blackbirds. As the orchard and garden de- veloped, other birds, well known to us and greatly beloved for their cheery, social ways, there made their home; such are the Orchard Oriole, Warbling Vireo and Yellow Warbler. The changes in condi- tions and continual increase in number of settlers caused a continual diminution in numbers of many hirds; especially is this true of geese, ducks and other water-loving species, while some birds famous in his- tory and literature have passed from us and are fast becoming extinet. Such are the Ivory-billed Woodpecker, Pileated Woodpecker, Wild Turkey and Carolina Parakeet. About our homes the Bluebirds, House Wrens and Carolina Wrens came and lived with us, even nearer and dearer than other birds. As time went on drainage became a feature introduced into the new couniry. With the drainage of our sloughs and swamps a second change was noted. The forms of avian life, which lived among its reeds and flags, mingling their voices with those of the frogs, disap- peared, and the land reclaimed tells, in its luxuriant growth of corn, no story to the casual passer-by of the former population which occu- pied it. Time went on, change followed change, little by little, but still each cleared field, each rotation of crops, each one of a thousand variations in cause had its effect upon the numbers or the life his- tory of our birds. DESTRUCTION OF BIRDS. By man’s agency the English Sparrow was introduced, and as its numbers increased, began to assert itself in the struggle for existence. The Bluebird, which has comé from the hole in the snag, was driven from her box. The Martin and Chimney Swift, which formerly nested in hollow trees, left their nesting sites about the house, and even the Kave Swallow, which in olden times fastened its nests to the cliffs, was in some cases driven away. The warfare still continues with this aggressive little foreigner, worse some places than others, but with such surprising powers of reproduction and un- heard-of audacity, it seems they must soon cover our entire continent. Another epoch in this category is marked by the abnormal craze which has for some years been noted of using the skins and parts of birds for purposes of decoration and adornment. This barbarous cus- tom has been frowned down in some places by society leaders, but is still quite common. , Birps oF INDIANA. 527 It is marvelous, the destruction of innocent, beneficial lives that have been sacrified upon the altar of fashion. Our State has now a very good law for the protection of our native birds, and it behooves us all to see that in our communities, our separate neighborhoods, that law is fully enforced. Unless this is done we may awake too late to the importance of protecting these feathered friends who gather their sub- stance from the insect enemies of the farm, the orchard, the garden and the woodland. Birds are also destroyed in great numbers by natural causes. The sudden severe storms which occur at times in the migrating season often cause the death of a great number of tiny wanderers. It is no unusual thing to find along the shores of Lake Michigan, and numbers of other great lakes, following some severe, cold storm, the bodies of great numbers of migrating birds. How great this loss of life is. cannot be estimated, but they are often found lying close together on the beach where they have been tossed by the waves. Again, it is no. unusual thing to find, following a spell of cold weather in April or May, the bodies of many birds which have just arrived from the South. and have been unable to withstand the effects of the sudden cold which came upon them. Other birds which irregularly winter with us, at times when they attempt to remain, are destroyed in great num- bers in unusually severe and unfavorable winter weather. A striking illustration of this was the severe weather of the late winter and early spring of 1895, when, over almost the entire Southern States east of the Mississippi, a cold wave prevailed coincident with the winter range of the Buebirds, Hermit Thrushes, Robins and other birds occupy- ing that region. These wintering birds were destroyed in great num- bers—so great, in fact, as almost to exterminate the entire race of Bluebirds and to greatly lessen the numbers of some other forms. In addition to this, many birds are destroyed at the time of migration on dark nights by flying against the lighthouses, light towers and other lights in high places. Unfavorable weather during the breeding season is also the cause of large loss of life among the young birds and of the destruction of many eggs. In addition, birds are subject to disease, fall a prey to their enemies, are killed by accident, and, as these conditions combine in a favorable or in an unfavorable way, we-may note among many species, taking one year with another, an increase or a decreasé in their normal numbers. 528 Report OF STATE GEOLOGIST. ZOOLOGICAL ARBAS. Geographers have attempted to divide the world into zoological re- gions in accordance with the harmonic distribution of certain typical forms. These zoological areas have not been very accurately defined. They may be termed the different divisions of the sea of animal life, with its tides, currents, varying temperature and depth, two areas meeting as land and sea, each with irregular shore lines and deeply indented coasts, the boundaries continually changing as barriers in one direction are overcome, and in another a different coast configura- tion appears. Indiana is included entirely within the Eastern (Atlantic) faunal province, and while it is within the limits of the Carolina fauna of Mr. Allen, the southern portion contains so many birds that are dis- tinctive of the Louisiana fauna (Austroriparian Province of Professor Cope) that it has been thought it should be referred to that district. According to Dr. Merriam’s provincial classification, almost all of Indiana is included within the upper Sonoran Zone. The Transition Zone appears in the northern part, while the extreme southwestern portion is included in an arm of the lower Sonoran Zone. BIRD MIGRATION. The migratory instinct is one of the wonders of nature. The origin of migration seems to reach far back into the unwritten history of the past. According to geological testimony, in the earlier ages of the earth’s history a warm climate existed almost to the North Pole. Then neither lack of food nor the consequences of rigorous winter compelled the birds to leave that favored region. With the changing of conditions by which the circumpolar area became colder, then ice- locked and finally the limit of ice extended far to the southward, the birds were forced to more congenial lands.. With the winter they sought warmer climes, and as the summer approached they sought to return to the ancestral home. Finally the southern limit of the ice sheet was reached, and it began to recede. With its recession the birds were enabled to reach higher latitudes, and in time, when the frigid area reached its present limitation, there was left for our solution the problem of the migration of birds. This habit is not the acquirement of any one bird, but is the influence of the experience of many gen- erations of birds extending through long ages of time, an inherited desire to seek nesting sites near the old home of their race. With what regularity do certain forms leave their summer homes in the temperate and frigid realms and traverse the great expanse of plain and wood and ocean to far within the tropics, there spending the Brrps oF INDIANA. 529 colder parts of the year, returning to the same breeding ground when summer approaches! Unerringly they pursue long lines of migration, as though following beaten paths, for thousands of miles. O’er river and lake and sea, o’er marsh and mountain and meadow they fly. So accurate is the chart, so true the compass of instinct, that each re- turning annual pilgrimage brings the little wanderers to their former homes. When the frosts touch the maple leaves and tinge the woods with bright autumn colors we miss some of our little friends. Day after day as the daylight grows shorter others follow where they led, until, when the snows come, many of the summer songsters have left us. These have sought the regions best suited to their condition in winter, where the food supply is more abundant or more easily ob- tained. Others from farther north have taken their places. ‘These, to us, are winter residents. To our friends farther northward they are summer residents; between us there is a region where they are known as migrants. Among these latter bids which spend a part or the whole winter in our States are the Junco or Black Snow-bird, one form of Shore-lark, Tree Sparrows, the Sapsucker or Yellow-bellied Wood- pecker, rarely the White Snow-bird or Snowflake, the Snowy Owl and the Bohemian Waxwing. Their summer homes are north of us. Some of the forms, perhaps most of them, which are with us the whole year round are not represented winter, spring, summer and au- tumn by the same individuals. In winter the Song Sparrow among the garden shrubbery or in the willow thickets are not particularly numer- ous, but late in March and early in April a host of Song Sparrows have appeared from the milder climate of Tennessee and neighboring States. Their numbers are very noticeable, but they, with many, perhaps all, of those who wintered with us, have passed on farther north. The usual number remains to keep house, rear a family and cheer humanity with their songs. With October those who spent their summers farther north return, and, as the frosts succeed dews and snows succeed frosts, they gradually pass by to favorite winter homes, leaving the individ- uals we knew the past winter with their children, our companions through the colder part of the year. The American Goldfinch that appears with the apple leaves in April in lemon-yellow dress with black cap and wings, comes from the southland to replace other more hardy relatives of his by the same name, who were hardly recognized by many of us for the plain winter dress they wore. Well, they passed on north- ward just a day or two before these brighter-appearing ones arrived from the pine groves and cotton fields of the Southern States. Next fall they will return with their bright colors deadened by the touch of the north wind, but we will know them by their voices. 34—GEOL. 530 Report OF STATE GEOLOGIST. The impression which may prevail that the winter residents are smaller than the summer forms is erroneous. The Shore-larks, which winter with us, represent the same species which is resident in summer and the northern form which is larger. The idea that many birds mi- grate at night is correct. Some winters the Robins, Meadow Larks, Kingfishers, Killdeers, Red-headed Woodpeckers and Chewinks remain with us. Other years they pass to the southward. Even when they are here, some years they seem to the casual observer to have left; yet the inquisitive lover of birds knows his little friends are to be found, even in inclement weather, though they do not appear to the uninitiated. To such an onea protected thicket, a deep ravine, an unexposed hillside, a dense wood- land, as his tramp leads through such out-of-the-way places, is found to be inhabited by forms which have disappeared to many eyes. The instinct which calls upon some to seek the better feeding grounds, the warmer places of earth, has impelled these to well-protected spots and localities where food may be most easily obtained. The Catbird, Blackbird, Chipping Sparrow and Phebe go but a little farther south, some years lingering along the Ohio River. The Marsh Wrens, Red-winged Blackbird, Hermit Thrush and sometimes the beautiful little Ruby-crowned Kinglet and eccentric lit- tle Blue-gray Gnat-catcher linger along the gulf coast, while all the north is snow-bound. Other birds go farther on their winter journey. The Baltimore Orioles go as far as Panama. Our cheery Bobolink with “his Quaker wife,” both plain clad when cold comes nigh, visit the West Indies and South America. The King Bird reaches the West Indes and Bolivia. The Night Hawk covers the same islands and Eastern South America. The Cerulean Warbler, on the contrary, visits Cuba and Central Amer- ica. Kirtland’s rare warbler winters only in the Bahamas. The little Spotted Sandpiper visits Brazil. The Blue-winged Teal extends its journey to Ecuador, and Swainson’s Thrush to Peru. Some make more extended tours even than these. The American Golden Plover, a well-known game bird, which breeds in the northern part of our continent, when winter holds the northern hemisphere in his cold grasp, is found as far away as Patagonia, while the Knot, a coast bird which breeds in very high northern latitudes, the eggs of which were taken by the members of the Greely Arctic expedition at Ft. Conger, about north latitude 82 degrees, ranges to Cape Horn during our -winter. Thus it will be observed migra- tion may mean the trip to the protected thicket in the vi- cinity of wild grapes. blackberries and weed patches laden with seed BiRDS OF INDIANA. 531 at the southern edge of the farm, or the almost endless voyage of some shore birds across every one of the earth’s zones. It may mean a change of individuals; a moving of those which summer with us a little farther south and a filling of their places by others of the same kind from a lit- tle farther north. It may mean a restlessness which some years impels the Bob White to move southward a few miles, or again to leave the hills and congregate in the valleys, or the reverse. Many times they fly into towns, and becoming confused, enter houses and stores, and are readily caught in the hand. It may mean the slow movement of the short-winged warblers and wrens, or the rapid flight of the swallow and Wild Pigeon. Its cause is the instinct which tells them to prepare for winter or return for spring. A call that must be answered, an in- herent demand. that comes to each individual through the accumulated experiences of the past which it cannot disobey. Birds do not move promiscuously over the country, but are observed to have migratory routes. The Mississippi. River is a great artery along which in spring courses a mighty stream of avian life destined to its breeding ground. At the mouth of the Ohio a large stream turns off to ascend that river, sending out branches of considerable size up the Wabash, Whitewater and Miami rivers. The Whitewater Valley forms one channel by which these wandering birds reach the Maumee and the lakes, whence many pass on still farther northward to their summer homes. As the rivers become the channels of migra- tion for certain species, other forms of different habits follow the higher lands or the mountain bases, along characteristic topographical features. As the warm air of spring comes, as from the throbbing of a great tropical heart, so the birds come, in pulsating movements, each suceeeding one stronger and driving its tide of life farther along its course. Each bird-wave seems to move as though the rear of the mi- grating forms was continually passing over the more advanced and tak- ing the lead. Among the smaller streams, the main ridges, the connect- ing woodland, at the height of the migration may readily be observed the smaller currents of bird life given off by the larger streams, each following its own course, all instinctively going in a definite direction —north. The whole movement may be compared to the circulation of sap ina tree. From trunk to limb, from limb to branch, from branch to bough, from bough to twig, from twig to leaf. The entire move- ment over either hemisphere may be likened to numberless trees with their roots at the equator, their topmost branches approaching the poles. In autumn the courses of the bird currents are not so plainly marked, but yet along the borders of our streams may be seen, at favorable times, hordes of little wanderers moving past in almost end- less streams at early morn and eventide. 532 REPORT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF INDIANA ORNITHOLOGY. The following bibliographical notes, while not complete, indicate many of the publications relating to Indiana birds, most of which were at hand for reference: 1808. Witson, A. American Ornithology; or the Natural History of the Birds of the United States; illustrated with plates, engraved and colored from original drawings taken from nature. By Alexander Wilson. Vol. I (-IX). Philadelphia. Published by Bradford & Inskeep. Printed by Robert Carr. Vol. I, 1808. Vol. IT, 1810. Vol. Ill, 1811. Vol. IV, 1811. Vol. V, 1812. Vol. VI, 1812. Vol. VII, 1814. Vol. VIII, 1814. Vol. IX, 1814. 1827. Avupuson, J. J. Birds of America. 4 v. doub. elephant folio. Lon- don. 435 colored plates. Original edition colored plates. 1827-49. The original edition of the text to Audubon’s great work, ‘‘ The Birds of America.’’ Very valuable. A copy at the Larking sale, May, 1892, brought £345. A copy is quoted in Quaritch’s cata- logue, May, 1894, at £350. 1831. Croeuan, Cot. Grorce. Journal of Col. Croghan, Monthly Ameri- can Journal of Geology and Natural Science. Philadelphia, De- cember, 1831. Mentions the occurrence of some birds in Indiana. Avupuson, J. J. Ornithological Biography; or an Account of the Hab- its of the Birds of the United States of America, accompanied by the descriptions of the objects represented in the work entitled, “‘The Birds of America,” and interspersed with delineations of American scenery and manners. By John James Audubon, F. R. SS. L. and E, ete. Vol. I—Edinburgh, Adam Black, 1831; also printed at Philadelphia by E. L. Carey and A. Hart, 1832. Vol. I]—Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black, 1834; also printed at Boston by Hilliard, Gray & Co. Vol. Il1I—Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black, 1835. Vol. IV—Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black, 1838. Vol. V—Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black, 1839. 1834, Butter, Mann. History of Kentucky. Louisville, 1834. Contains a copy of the Journal of Col. Croghan down the Ohio in 1765. Refers to Indiana birds. Birps oF INDIANA. 533 1840. Aupuson, J. J. The Birds of America. From drawings made in the United States and their Territories. By John James Audubon. New York, published by J. J. Audubon. Philadelphia, J. B. Che- valier, 1840-44. 7 vols. 1846. Cro@Han, Grorae. Journal of George Croghan. The Olden Time, a monthly publication devoted to the preservation of documents and other authentic information in relation to the early explorations and the settlement and improvement of the country around the head of the Ohio. Edited by Neville S. Craig, Esq. Two vols., small 4to. Pittsburg, 1846-48. 1856. Haymonp, Rurus, M. D. Birds of Southeastern Indiana. Proc. Acad- emy of Natural Science, Philadelphia, Vol. VIII, 1856, pp. 286- 298. A list of birds observed in the Whitewater Valley. 1868. “ Auten, J. A. Notes on birds observed in Western Iowa, in the months of July, August and September; also on birds observed in Northern Illinois in May and June, and at Richmond, Wayne County, In- diana, between June 3d and 10th. Memoirs Boston Soc. Natural History, Vol. I, Pt. IV, Art. XII, December, 1868, pp. 488-526. Also issued separately. Mentions 72 Indiana species. 1869. ¥ Haymonp, Rurus. Birds of Franklin County, Indiana. First Annual Report of the Geological Survey of Indiana, made during the year 1869, by E. T. Cox, State Geologist, 1869, pp. 209-335. Also issued bound with Agricultural Report of the same year, entitled Indiana Agricultural and Geological Report, 1869, etc. 1873. Eprror’s Norr. Refers to southern part of Wayne County, Indiana, as a good place for quails. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. I, 1873- 4, 7, p. 106. Amateur. Prairie Chickens. Account of a trip into Indiana after them. Forest and Stream, N. Y., 1878-4, Vol. I, 7 p. 98. 534 Report oF State GEOLOGIST. 1874. Kretianp, J. P. Letter from, dated 1857, mentioning various Indiana birds Proce. Cleveland Acad. Nat. Science, 1874, pp. 131-132. Rineway, R. The Wabash Valley and Its Avian Fauna. Proc. Bos- ton Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. XVI, pp. 303-382. Riveway, R. The Lower Wabash Valley, considered in its relation to the Faunal Districts of the Eastern Regions of North America, with a Synopsis of Its Avian Fauna, by Robert Ridgway. Boston, 1874, p. 31. Repaged edition of the above. Cougs, Etiiorr. Birds of the Northwest, a handbook of the Ornithol- ogy of the region drained by the Missouri River and its tributaries. Dept. of the Interior, U. S. Geol. Survey of the Territories, Mis- cellaneous Publications, No. 8, 1874. Eprror’s Nore. Wild Turkey found breeding at Valparaiso, Ind. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. III, 1874-5, 10, p. 150. Enpiror’s Nore. Wild Pigeon, very abundant in Michigan, Indiana and Wisconsin in beech woods. Sept. 15, 1874. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. II, 1874-5, 7, p. 107. 1876. JORDAN, Davip Srarr. Manual of the Vertebrates of the Northern United States, including the District East of the Mississippi River and North of North Carolina and Tennessee, exclusive of marine species, by David Starr Jordan, Ph. D., M. D., Porfessor of Nat- ural History in N. W. C. University and in Indiana State Medical College. Chicago, Jansen, McClurg & Co., 1876. Refers to a number of Indiana birds. A second edition, dated 1878; a third, 1880; a fourth in 1888. Smita, G. Aue. Birds of Ft. Wayne, Indiana. Forest and Stream, Vol. Rs 1876, p. 148. Fifty species mentioned, some by error. Cougs, Exuiorr. Peculiar nesting site of Bank Swallow (i. e., Stelgido- pleryx serripenns). Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. I, 1876, p. 98. Haymonp, R. Notes on the Bank Swallow (i. e., Stelgidopteryx serripen- nis). Field and Forest, Vol. I, 1876, No. 11, p. 88. Cougs, Extiorr. Notable change of habit of the Bank Swallow (i. @., Stelgidopteryx serripennis). American Naturalist, Vol. X, 1876, pp. 492-493. Newson, E. W. Additions to the avifauna of Illinois, with notes on other species of Illinois birds. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. I, 1876, pp. 39-44. Notes some observations on the Wabash River. 1877. Nexson, E. W. The Louisiana Heron in Indiana. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. II, 1877, p. 51. Brirps oF INDIANA. 535 Vv Neztson, E. W. Birds of Northeastern Illinois. Bull. of the Essex Institute, Vol. VIII, 1877, p. 90-155. Some observations noted about the southern end of Lake Michigan,’along the Indiana and Tlinoig line. v Netson, E. W. Notes upon birds observed in Southern‘ Illinois between July 17 and September 4, 1875. Bull. of the Essex Institute, Vol. IX, 1877, pp. 32-65. Part of the observations made on the Wabash River and part on the White River. V ObLocist (A. W. Burier). The Nesting of the Wood Pewee. The Odlogist, Vol. III, 1877, p. 37. v Lanapon, Franx W. A catalogue of the birds in the vicinity of Cin- cinnati, Frank W. Langdon, Salem, Mass. Naturalists’ Agency, 1877, pp. 18. Mentions several observations on Indiana birds. Arrow. A voice against the English Sparrow from Indianapolis, In- diana. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. VILL, 1877, 17, p. 261. Carey, A. G. Observations on the English Sparrow at Indianapolis, Indiana. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. VIII, 1877, 19, p. 307. 1878. Ripeway, Roperr. A review of the American species of the genus Seops Savigny. Proc. U. S. National Museum, Vol. I, 1878, pp. 85-117. Notes the results of observations on the dichromatic phases of Scops asio. In part made in Indiana. Y Brewster, Wittiam. The Prothonotary Warbler. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. III, 1878, pp. 153-162, Based on observations made in Knox and Gibson Counties, Indiana. ¥ Ripaway, Ropert. Notes on birds observed at Mt. Carmel, Southern Illinois, in the spring of 1878. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. II, 1878, pp. 162-166. Based in part upon observations in the cypress swanips in Indiana. Sanaer. Ruffed Grouse. Observations made at Elkhart, Indiana. Believes not over one-third killed are males. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. [X, 1877-8, 26, p. 489. V Atuen, J. A. Early nesting of the Shore Lark near Indianapolis. Ball. Nuttall Orn..Club, Vol. ILI, 1878, p. 189. v Cougs, Exuiotr. Birds of the Colorado Valley. Dept. of the Interior U.S. Geol. Survey of the Territories. Miscellaneous Publications, : No. 11. Part First, Passeres to Laniide. 1878. Evermann, B. W. Notes on the winter birds of Carroll County, In- diana. Printed im various issues of the Delphi Journal during the winter of 1878-9. 536 REPoRT oF STATE GEOLOGIST. 1879. Lanepon, Frank W. A revised list of Cincinnati birds. Journal Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. I, 1879, pp. 1-27. Mentions several Indiana birds. Anonymous. Note on Woodcock flushed at Bath, Indiana, March 2, 1879. Forest and Stream, N. Y., Vol. XII, 1879, 18, p. 245. 1880. Riveway, Roperr. On six species of birds new to the fauna of Illinois, with notes on other rare Illinois birds. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. V, 1880, pp. 30-32. Notes the occurrence of Ibis alba at Mt. Carmel, Illinois. Brayton, ALEMBERT W. A catalogue of the birds of Indiana, with keys and descriptions of the groups of the greatest interest to the horticulturist, by Alembert W. Brayton, B. S., M. D. Transac- tions Indiana State Horticultural Society for 1879, pp. 87-165. Auten, J. A. Review-of Brayton’s catalogue of the birds of Indiana. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. V, 1881, pp. 174-175. Lanepon, Frank W. Ornithological field notes, with five additions to the Cincinnati avifauna. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. of Nat. Hist., Vol. WI, 1880, pp. 121-127. Contains several notes on birds of Franklin County, Indiana. Anonymous. Bird architecture. St. Nicholas, Vol. VII, 7, 1880, Pp. 57. Refers to Oriole’s nest at Spiceland, Indiana. 1881. Quick, E. R. Catharista atrata Less. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. IV, 1881, pp. 340-341. Two specimens noted near - Brookville, Indiana. Quick, E. R. Chen hyperboreus Boie. Journ. Cincinnati Suc. Nat. Hist., Vol. IV, 1*81, p. 341. Specimens taken near Brookville, Indiana. Layepon, F. W. Zodlogical Miscellany—Ornithology. Journ. Cin- cinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. IV, 1881, pp. 337-841. Contains sev- eral notes from Brookville, Indiana. Rineway. Ropert. A catalogue of the birds of Illinois. Bull. No. 4. Illinois State Laboratory of Nat. Hist., May, 1881, pp. 163-208. Mentions the occurrence of the Louisiana Heron (A. tricolor rufi- collis Gosse) in Indiana, etc. Baitey, H. B. Forest and Stream. Bird Notes; an index and sum- mary of all the ornithological matter contained in Forest and Stream, Vol. I-XII (Aug., 1873; Aug., 1879). Compiled by H. B. Bailey, New York. Forest and Stream Publishing Company, 39 Park Row, 1881. Brirps oF INDIANA. 537 1882. Vv Ripeway, Ropert. Notes on some of the birds observed near Wheat- land, Knox County, Indiana, in the spring of 1881. Bull. Nuttall Orn. Club, Vol. VII, 1882, pp. 15-33. Vv Evermann, B. W. A short note on the nesting of the Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus). Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. VI, p. 61. Lanepon, F. W. Dichromatism in the Screech Owl (Scops asio Bp.). Journal Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. V, 1882, pp. 52-53. Re- fers to several Indiana specimens. Lanepon, F. W. A synopsis of the Cincinnati fauna. Zodlogical Miscellany, Journal Cin. Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. V, No. 3, pp. 185-194. Includes birds. Quick, E. R. Winter birds of 1880 and 1881 on the White Water. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. V, 1882, pp. 54-56. Quick, E. R. Ornithological notes from Brookville, Indiana. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. V, 1882, p. 192. Burien, A. W. The birds of Franklin County, Indiana. Atlas of Franklin County, Indiana, etc., J. H. Beers & Co., Chicago, 1882, pp. 11-12. Butter, A. W. Ornithological notes from Brookville, Indiana. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. V, 1882, pp. 192-193. Quick, E. R. Brookville ({ndiana) notes. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. V, pp. 93-95. Appears under the caption ‘Ornithol- ogy” under ‘‘ Zodlogical Miscellany.” v Wueaton, J. M., M. D. Report on the birds of Ohio. Report of the Geological Survey of Ohio, Vol. LV; Zodlogy and Botany, Part I; Zodlogy, Section II, Columbus, Ohio, 1882, pp. 187-628. Notes several observations on Indiana birds. 1883. Lanepon, F. W., M. D. ‘Bibliography of the Cincionati fauna. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. VI, 1883, pp. 5-538. Mentions several publications on Indiana birds. ¥ Evermann, B. W. Notes from Bloomington, Indiana. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. VIII, pp. 27-28. 1884. Burier, A. W. Local Weather Lore. The American Meteorological Journal, Dec., 1884, pp. 313-316. Relating to birds. Burrter, A. W. Local Weather Lore. Proc. A. A. A. S., Vol. “XXXIII, 1884, pp. 603-609. Abstract of above. 538 REporT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. Vv Burier, A. W. The Cerulean Warbler. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. IX, 1884, pp. 27-28. Evermann, B. W. Arrivals of birds at Camden, Indiana, 1884. Or- nithologist and Oélogist, Vol. IX, 1884, p. 74. Also published in the spring of 1884, in ‘‘ The Township Institute.”’ Y Nos, Firercner M. Chimney Swallows. Qrnithologist and Odlogist, Vol. IX, 1884, p. 104. v Bicxnett, Evcense P. A study of the singing of our birds. The Auk, Vol. I, Oct., 1884, p. 326. A series of articles running through several numbers of this journal. This particular citation refers to the nate of the Scarlet Tanager in Indiana. Evermann, B. W. Bird Migration. Am. Field, Vol. XXI, pp. 544- 545. Nor, Frercaer M. Are Owls beneficial to the farmer? Also notes on the species in Indiana. Indiana Farmer, July 5, 1884. Nos, FiercHer M. Variation in color of the Sereech Owl. Indiana Farmer, July 10, 1884. 1885. SHarPE, R. Bowpier. Catalogue of the Passeriformes or Perching Birds in the collection of the British Museum, ete., Vol. X, Lon- don, 1885.pA..3 6S. Contains a number of Indiana references, including Geothlypis macgillivrayi (?) from Wolf Lake, Indiana. This series of publica- tions, which began to be issued in 1874, and is still being published, contains a number of references to Indiana birds. Y Nor, Fuercaer M. Red Crossbill in Indiana. Ornithologist and Odlo- gist, Vol. X, 1885, p. 32. Butier, A. W. The Cuckoo. Indiana Farmer, April; 1885, p. 14. V Burier, A. W. Observations on Faunal changes. Bull. Brookville Soc. Nat. Hist., No. 1, pp. 5-13. Includes notes on birds which were republished in Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. X, 1885, pp. 98-99: v Burter, A. W. Observations on Faunal changes. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. X, 1885, pp. 98-99. Reprint of last. Nor, Frercuer M. The value of birds as insect destroyers. Indiana Farmer, Jan. 17, 1885. (Abstract of paper before State Board of Agriculture.) V Evermann, Barron W. A day with the birds of a Hoosier swamp. Ornithologist and. Oblogist, Vol. XI, 1886, p. 99. Bravos oF INDIANA. 539 1886. Burier, Amos W. A list of birds observed in Franklin County, In- diana. Bull. Brookville Soe. Nat. Hist., No. 2, 1886, pp. 12-39. Buarcutey, W. 8. Winter birds of the vicinity of Bloomington, In- diana. Hoosier Naturalist, 1, pp. 169-171. V Evermann, B. W. White eggs of the Bluebird. Ornithologist and Qélogist, Vol. IT, 1886, p. 124. Nog, Fiercuer M. Notes on the destruction of Indiana birds for mil- linery purposes. Indianapolis News, Feb. 22, 1886. Nog, FietcHer M. Notes on Indiana birds. Indianapolis News, Feb. 27, 1886. Tuomrson, Maurice. Some song birds of Indiana. Report of the State Board of Agriculture, 1885, pp. 247-252. V A. O. U. Cuecx Lisr. The code of nomenclature and check list of North American birds, adopted by the American Ornithologists’ Union, New York, 1886. Greae, J. C. Hoosier Naturalist, Vol. I, p. 155. Letter about birds. Butter, A. W. The Periodical Cicada in Southeastern Indiana. U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Division of Entomology, Bulletin No. 12, pp. 2431. Refers to birds known to eat cicadas. 1887. ¥ Hay, O. P. The Red-headed Woodpecker a Hoarder. The Auk, Vol. IV, July, 1887, pp. 193-6. Observations near Irvington, Indiana. Evermann, B. W. Birds of Mouroe County, Indiana. The Hoosier Naturalist, Vol. 11, 1887, pp. 137-145. Evermann, B. W. Some rare Indiana birds. American Naturalist, Vol. XXI, 1887, pp. 290-291. Evermann, B. W. Bird Migration. Popular Science Monthly, April, 1887. Evermann, B. W. An addition to the list of birds of Monroe County, Indiana. Hoosier Naturalist, Vol. II, 1887, p. 164. Riveway, Ropert. A Manual of North American Birds. Philadel- phia. J. B. Lippincott Co., 1887. 1888. Burier, A. W. Tropical Sojourners. The Agassiz Companion, Vol. ILI, No. 6, 1888, pp. 61-63. V Bur.er, A. W. Notes on the range of the Prothonotary Warbler in Indiana. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vel. XII, 1888, pp. 33-34. 540 Report OF STATE GEOLOGIST. v EvermMANN, Barton W. Birds of Carroll County, Indiana. The Auk, Vol. V, 1888, pp. 344-351; continued in Vol. VI, 1889, pp. 22-30. Butter, Amos W. Notes concerning albinism among birds. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Jan. 1, 1888, pp. 214-216. Noe, FLetcHER M. Do English Sparrows protect trees from insect rav- ages? Indianapolis News, June 15, 1888. ¥ Buarcatey, W.S. ‘A Gnatcatcher’s Strategy.” Audubon Magazine, March, 1888. Describes a two-story nest of the Blue-gray Gnat- catcher, Polioptila coerulea (Linn.), taken near Bloomington. A Cowbird had deposited an egg in the nest proper and the second story was built over the egg. v West, F. M. A Cross-billed Woodpecker. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. XIII, p. 95, June, 1888. Specimen of Melanerpes carolinensis noted from Greensburg, Indiana. ‘Y Trouier, Jas. 8. Correspondence from (Greensburg) Indiana. The Bay State Odlogist, Vol. I, No. 6, June, 1888, p. 52. Account of nesting of a pair of Bluebirds in the sand pump of a well-driller’s outfit. Reprinted in the Ornithologist and Odlogist Annual, Vol. J, No. 1, January, 1889, p. 29. Haneaer, O. P. Black Vulture (Catharista atrata) in Orange County, Indiana. The Curlew, Orleans, Indiana, Vol. I, No. 3, December, 1888, p. 35. 1889. Lanepon, F. W., M. D. On the occurrence of large numbers of six- teen species of birds. Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. XII, 1889, pp. 57-63. Notes the unusual abundance of the Rose-breasted Grosbeak at Brookville, Indiana, in the spring of 1885. v Evermann, B. W. The Wood Ibis of Indiana. The Auk, Vol. VI, 1889, pp. 186-187. V Roveway, Rosert. The Ornithology of Hlinois. Natural History Sur- vey of Illinois. State Laboratory of Natural History, S. A. Forbes, Director. Part I, Descriptive Catalogue, by Robert Ridgway, Vol. I, Springfield, I]., 1889, pp. 520+ VII, pls. XXXII. The present volume ends with Columb. Contains many references to Indiana birds. ¥ Barrows, Water B. The English Sparrow (Passer domesticus) in North America, especially in its relation to agriculture. Prepared under the directions of Dr. C. Hart Merriam, Ornithologist, by Walter B. Barrows, Assistant Ornithologist. Bulletin No. 1, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Division of Economic Onithology and Mammalogy, Washington, 1889, pp. 405 and map. A number of Indiana observations noted. é Birps oF INDIANA. —- 541 Vv Dwicut, JonatHan, JR. The Horned Larks of North America. The Auk, Vol. VII, 1890, pp. 138-158 and map. Notes specimens from Indianapolis, Indiana. THompson, Maurice. Preliminary sketch of the aquatic and shore birds of the Kankakee region. Rept. Ind. Geol. Survey, 1888, pp. 102-164. Davie, Ouiver. Nests and Eggs of North American Birds. Fourth ed., 1892, pp. 455-++12+11. Three previous editions. Buarcotey, W. S. ‘‘The Coming of the Birds.” Terre Haute Ga- zette, April 17, 1889. Gives the arrivals in the vicinity of Terre Haute to that date. Nesruwe, H. North American Birds. Issued in parts. No. 1, 1889. George Brumder, Milwaukee, Wis. 1889-1896. 18-9. Buatcauey, W. S. Our Feathered Friends of Indiana. A series of five articles in Indiana Farmer, under dates of May 4, May 18, May 25 and Nov. 23, 1889, and March 29, 1890. 1890. VY Nog, FietcHer M. Wood Ibisin Indiana. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. XV, p. 167. Vv N(orris), J.P. A series of the eggs of the Prothonotary Warbler. Or- nithologist and Oélogist, Vol. XV. Dec. 1890, pp. 172-182. Speci- mens noted from Carroll County, Indiana. 1891. Vv Burter, Amos W. A catalogue of the birds of Indiana. Trans. In- diana Hort. Soc., 1890. Appendix C, pp. 1-135. Also separately printed. Butter, Amos W. Our birds and what they do for the farmer. Rept. State Board of Agl., Indiana, 1890, pp. 113-125. Also issued sep- arately in pamphlet form. Y Hasprouck, Epwin M. The Carolina Paroquet (Conurus carolinensis). The Auk, Vol. VIII, 1891, pp. 369-379. , v Auten, J. A. Butler’s Birds of Indiana. Review. The Auk, Vol. VIL, p. 383. vy Hasprouck, Epwin M. The present status of the Ivory-billed Wood- pecker (Campephilus principalis). The Auk, 1891, Vol. VIII, pp. 174 186. Hine, Jane L. Tyrant Flycatchers. The Waterloo Press, Vol, XXXII, No. 30, March 19, 1891. 542 REporT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. Y Keyser, L.S. Bird-dom. Boston. D. Lothrop & Co., 1891. Refers to Rose-breasted Grosbeak in Indiana, p. 44. Parker, B.S. Hoosier Bards. Chicago. Charles H. Kerr, 1891. A. delightfully accurate interpretation of the songs of our birds by a poet. Biarcuiey, W. S. Birds and Their Value on the Farm. Terre Haute Gazette, Jan. 13, 1891. A paper read before the Vigo County Farmers’ Institute. 1892. Bo:Ler, Amos W. Notes on Indiana birds. Proc. Indiana Acad. of Sci , 1891, pp. 164-166. v Burien, AMos W. Notes on the range and habits of the Carolina Par- akeet. The Auk, Vol. IX, No. 1, Jan., 1892, pp. 49-56. McBripe, R Wes. Some notes on the birds of Indiana. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci , 1891, pp. 166-169, v Burter, Amos W. Some notes concerning the Evening Grosbeak. The Auk, Vol. IX, pp. 238-247. “ Nog, Furetcaer M. Note on White Pelican. New Castle. Indiana. Oruithologist and O6 ogist, Vol. VI, p. 123. ¥ Uxrey, A. B. Notes on the American Bittern (Botawrus lentiginosus). Ornithologist and Oologist, Vol. XVII, pp. 76 77. ¥ Goutp, James E. Note on nesting of Bald Eagle at English Lake, In- diana. Ornithologist and Oélogist, Vol. XVII, p. 64. “ Kinote, E. M. Arrivals of some migratory birds of Johuson County, Indiana. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. XVII, p. 44. V Benorre, Cuarves, Cart..U. 8. A. Life Histories of North American Birds. Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum. ‘Special Bulletin No. 1, 1492, pp. 1-414. 1893 v Burier, AMus W. Range of the Crossbill (Lozia) iu the Ohio Valley, with notes on their unusual occurrence in summer. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., 1892, pp. 63-72. ¥ Burter, Amos W. Further notes on the Evening Grosbeak. The Auk, Vol. X, 1893, pp. 155-157. Coox, A. J. Birds of Michigan. Bull. 94, Mich. Agl. College, pp. 1-148, first edition. References to Indiana birds. Cook, A. J. Birds of Michigan. Bull. 94, Mich. Agl. College, pp. 1-168, second edition, Binps or INDIANA. 543 V Fisner, A. K., M. D. The Hawks and Owls of.the United States in their relation to agriculture. Bull. No. 3, Div. Orn. and Mam. U. S. Dept. Agriculture, 1893, pp. 210. v Cox, Unysszs O.~ A list of the birds of Randolph County, Indiana, with some notes on the mammals of the same county. Ornitholo- gist and Odlogist, Vol. XVIII, 1893, pp. 2-3. v McBrive, Heesert W. Letter. Notes on Rose-breasted Grosbeak in Michigan and Indiana. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. XVIII, p. 47. Burter, AMos W. On the migration of birds. Indiana Farmer, Oct. 21, 1893. v Butter, Amos W. The range of Crossbills in the Ohio Valley, with notes on their unusual occurrence in summer. The American Nat- uralist, Vol. XXVIII, 1894, pp. 136-146. Anonymous. Account of Swan (sp?) killed on Little Beaver Lake, Newton County, Indiana. Forest and Stream, Vol. XL, No. 13, p. 72. ‘ Hassrovuck, E. M. Evolution and Dichromatism of the Genus Mega- scops. American Naturalist, Vol. X XVII, pp. 521-533; 638-649 v Mourcaison, A.C Distribution of the Mocking Bird in Illinois. Or- nithologist and Odlogist, Vol. XVIII, 1898, pp. 67-70. Indiana reference. Hine, Jane L. Birds that Befriend Our Forest Trees. A series of chapters irregularly published in the Farmer’s Guide, Huntington, Indiana. Chapter lin Vol. V, No. 1, Jan. 1; Ch. ILin Vol. V, No. 2, Jan. 15; Ch. [Lin Vol. V, No. 8, Feb. 1; Ch. IV in Vol. V, No. 4, Feb. 15; Ch. V in Vol. V, No. 6, March 15; Ch. — in Vol. V, No. 27, Dec. 15. ¥ Mourcuison, A.C. Distribution of the Long-eared Owl and Cooper’s Hawk in [llinois. Ornithologist and Oslogist, Vol. XVIII, 18938, pp. 17-22, 33-35, 49-61. Indiana reference. Y Coox, A. J. Birds of Michigan. A review. Ornithologist and Odlo- gist, Vol. XVIL, 1893, p. 106. “ Morcuison, A CU. Distribution of the Black-crowned Night Heron in Illinois. Ornithologist and Odlogist, Vol. XVIII, 1893, pp. 82-85. Indiana reference. Nesruwe, H. Our Native Birds of Song and Beauty, Vol. I, 1893. Geo. Brumder, Milwaukee, Wis. Also issued in parts as North American Birds, beginning in 1889. 544 Report oF STATE GEOLOGIST. 1893. Biatcutey, W. S. Our Winter Birds. A series of ten articles in Terre Haute Gazette under dates of Dec. 9 and 16, 1893, and Jan. 6, 18, 20; Feb. 38, 10, 17, 24, and March 3, 1894. 1894. Ereenmann, C. H. Report of Director Division of Zodlogy Indiana Biological Survey. Proceedings Indiana Academy of Science, 1893, pp. 68-69. Reference to work done in ornithology. Burier, A. W. Bibliography of Indiana Ornithology. Jbid., pp. 108-116. Burien, A. W. Notes on Indiana Birds. Jbid., pp. 116-120. Notes on 24 species. First Indiana record of Tryngites subruficollis, Mi- cropalama himantopus, Tringa bairdii, and Dendroica kirtlandt. v Loucks, W. E. The life history and distribution of the Prothonotary Warbler in Hlinois. Bull. Ill. State Lab. of Nat. Hist, Champaign, Til., Vol. IV, No. 3. Springfield, Ill., 1894. Reference to Indiana. Hine, Jane L. Farmers, Take Care of Your Birds. The Farmer’s Guide, Huntington, Indiana, Vol. VI, No. 10, May 15, 1894. 1895. V Barrows, Watrer B, anp E. A. Scuwarz. The Common Crow of the United States. Bull. No. 6, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Div. of Ornithology and Mammalogy, pp. 98, 1895. “ Deans, Ruraven. The European Widgeon (Anas penelope) in Indi- ana. The Auk, Vol. XH, 1895, April, 179. v Deane, Ruraven. Another European Widgeon (Anas penelope) in In- diana. Ibid., July, 292. ¥ Deane, Rutuven. Additional records of the mene Pigeon in Illi- nois and Indiana. Ibid., 298-300. V Deane, Rutaven. Record of a third specimen of the European Wid- geon (Anas penelope) in Indiana. Ibid , 292. ¥V Dunn, James O. The Passenger Pigeon in the Upper Mississippi Val- ley. Jbid., Oct., 389. Reference to record near Liverpool, Indi- ana, March 14, 1894. v Duwn, James O. Henslow’s Sparrow iu Indiana. Jbid., 391-2 v Donny, James O. Notes on some birds of Northeastern Illinois. Ibid., 393-5. Record of Prothonotary Warbler, Wilder’s, Indiana. Buiarcutey, W. 8. Protect the Woodpeckers. Indianap lis Sunday Journal, Oct. 27, 1895. Birps oF INDIANA. 545 Monoquer (L. H. Haymonp). An American King, or the Home, Haunts and Habits of the Ruffed Grouse. The American Field, Vol. XLIV, No. 22, Nov. 30, 1895, pp. 509-511. Monoquer (L. H. Haymonp). American Woodcock and Woodcock Shooting. Jbid., No. 26, Dec. 28, 1895, pp. 605-608. Burier, A. W. With the Birds of Winona. The Indiana Synod, Vol. II, No. 2, Dec., 1895, pp. 78-80. Kinoiz, E. M. Preliminary list of the birds of Brown County. Pro- ceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 1894, pp. 68-73. Enumerates 106 species. ¥ Gaines, Aneus. Books and Birds. Nidiologist, August, 1895, p. 162. ¥ Gaines, Ancus, Eggs of Nighthawks and Whippoorwills. Nidiolo- gist, March, 1895, p. 91. ¥ GarnEs, ANcus. Migration. Nidiologist, July, 1895, p. 152. Vv Gaines, ANGus. Owls and Their Nests. Odlogist, May, 1895, p. 85. vGatnes, Ancus. Hawks and Their Nests. Odlogist, Dec., 1895, p. 175. Buriter, A. W. Notes on the Birds of 1894. Jbid., pp. 73-80. Notes on 24 species of birds. Includes record of the first occurrence of Anas penelope and of the breeding of Porzana jamaicensis. ’ Gaines, ANaus. Woodpeckers and Their Nests. Odlogist, July, 1895, p. 115. v Beat, F. E. L., Assistant Ornithologist. Preliminary report on the food of Woodpeckers. Bull. No. 7, U. 8. Dept. of Agriculture, Div. of Ornithology and Mammalogy, pp. 33. * Gatnes, Anaus. The Blue Jay. Nidiologist, June, 1895, p. 182. 1896. Hine, Jane L. Farm Birds in Northern Indiana. The Farmer's Guide, Huntington, Indiana, Vol. VIII. A series of articles in chapters in the following numbers of that paper: No. 3, Feb. 1, 1896; No. 4, Feb. 15; No. 5, March 1; No. 6, March 15; No. 7, April 1; No. 8, April 15; No. 9, May 1. Cuans_er, E. J. Our Feathered Beauties. Indiana Farmer, Feb. 15, 1896, p. 6. Anonymous. Pigeon Roosts Fifty Years Ago. Indiana Farmer, Feb. 22, 1896. From Cincinnati Commercial-Gazette. Hine, JANE L. Cedar Waxwing. Farmer’s Guide, Vol. VIII, No. 12, June 15, 1896. 35—GEOL. 546 Report oF STATE GEOLOGIST. Butter, A. W. “The range of the Crossbills in the Ohio Valley, with notes on their unusual occurrence in summer. In a volume entitled ‘Papers Presented to the World’s Congress on Ornithology.” Ed- ited by Mrs. E. Irene Rood, Chairman Woman’s Committee of the Congress, under the direction of Dr. Elliott Coues, President of the Congress, Chicago. Charles H. Sergel Company, 1896, pp. 47-58. Gaines, Ancus. Our Animal Friends. The Nest in the Rushes (Grebe), p. 62, Nov., 1896. Urey, ALBERT B. Contributions to the Biological Survey of Wabash County, Indiana. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., 1895, Indianapolis, Indiana, Feb., 1896, p. 147. Refers to the result of investigations of the bird fauna of that county. Him, Jane L. The Picnic of the Birds. The Farmer’s Guide, Hunt- ington, Indiana, Vol. VIII, No. 15, Aug. 1, 1896. Ucrey, ALBERT B., anp Witi1am O. Watuace. Birds of Wabash County. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., 1895, Indianapolis, Indiana, Feb., 1896, pp. 148-159. A local list of 186 species. Butter, A. W. Additional Notes on Indiana Birds. IJbid., pp. 162- 168. CHAMBERLAIN, F. M. Water Birds of Turkey Lake. Ibid., p. 264. A list of 14 species noted between July 1 and Sept. 1, 1895. Neueuine, H. Our Native Birds of Song and Beauty, Vol. II. Geo. Brumder, Milwaukee, Wis., 1896. Ripeway, Ropert. A Manual of North American Birds, by Robert Ridgway. Second edition. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Com- pany, 1896. A number of Indiana references. Wooprurr, Frank M. On birds reported as ranging in Cook County, Il. The Auk, Vol. XIII, 1896, April, 17981. Reference to In- diana notes. Deane, Ruraven. Record of a fourth specimen of the European Wid- geon (Anas penelope) in Indiana. Jbid., July, 255. Gates, Anaus. In the Haunts of the Sandpiper. Recreation, Au- gust, 1896, p. 97. Buriter, A. W. Indiana—A Century of Changes in the Aspects of Nature. President’s address. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 1895, pp. 31-42. Refers to changes in avifauna. Burier, A. W. Indiana—A Century of Changes in the Aspects of Nature. The Inland Educator. Printed in advance of preced- ing, of which it is a copy. Brrps oF INDIANA. 547 1897. ‘ Wooprurr, F. M. The Chicago Academy of Sciences. Notes on the ty meeting of the Ornithological Section, Jan. 6, 1897. Reference made to the capture of a specimen of Uria lomvia. Brunnich’s Murre, at Foresman, Indiana, Dec. 31, 1896. The Osprey, Gales- burg, Ill., Vol. I, No. 6, Feb., 1897, p. 83. Gaines, ANcus. The Nest of the Brown Thrush. Recreation, August, 1897, p. 420. Meyncxe, O. M. An Early Whippoorwill. The Osprey, Vol. I, No. 9, May, 1897, p. 128. Notes on hearing a Whippoorwill in Frank- lin County, Indiana, March 2, 1897. Gatnes, Ancus. Our Animal Friends. Winter visitors (Doves), p. 158, March, 1897. Gaines, Ancus. Our Animal Friends. Summer Yellowbird, p. 238, June, 1897. Paumer, T.S. Extermination of Noxious Animals by Bounties, by T. S. Palmer, First Assistant Biological Survey U. 8. Department of Agriculture. Year Book of the Department of Agriculture for 1896, pp. 55-68. ' Burter, A. W. The unusual occurrence of Brunnich’s Murre (Uria lomvia) far inland, with notes on other rare birds. The Auk, Vol. XIV, 1897, April, 197-20. Woonrvurr, Frank M. Lake Michigan Bird Notes. JIbid., 227-8. Notes partly on Indiana birds. AuuEN, J. A. Review. Butler on a Century of Changes in the As- pects of Nature in Indiana. Review of address of President of In- diana Academy of Science, 1895. Ibid., 245. Eprror. Review. Butler, a Century of Changes in the Aspects of Nature. The Ibis, Vol. III, No. 11, 1897, July, p. 459, London, Eng. Gaines, Axcus. The Nest of the Brown Thrush. Recreation, June, 1897, pp. 420-1. Observations in Knox County, Indiana. . Dwicur, Jonataan J., M. D. A Study of the Philadelphia Vireo (Vireo philadelphicus). The Auk, Vol. XIV, No. 8, July, 1897, pp. 259-272. Butter, A. W. The Bobolink (Dolichonyzx oryzivorus) in Indiana. Pro- ceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science of 1896, pp. 227-243. 548 ReEporRT OF StaTE GEOLOGIST. Butter, A. W. Some additions to the Indiana bird list, with other notes. Ibid., 1896, pp. 244-246. < Jonnson, W. A. The Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) in Indiana, by A. W. Butler. A note on this paper. The Osprey, Vol. II, No. 4, Dec., 1897, p. 54. 1898. 4 Wooprurr, Frank M, Lake Michigan Notes. The Auk, Vol. XV, No. 1, pp. 61-62, January, 1898. Mentions a number of birds from the shore of Lake Michigan, in Lake County, Indiana. % Smrra, C. Preer. Variation of Nest Material. The Osprey, Vol. II, Nos. 6 and 7, 1898, p. 91. EXPLANATION. The nomenclature used is that adopted by the American Ornitholo- gists’ Union. The first number given before each species is the serial number for this list; the second number, enclosed in parenthesis, is that by which it is indicated in the A. O. U. Check List. No species is included in this list unless it is known to have been reported, upon good authority, to have been observed within the State, and no species has been reported as having bred within the State un- less it is known, according to the same authority, to have done so. All measurements are given in inches and hundredths of an inch. KEY TO BIRDS. ORDERS. /, a), Hind toe well developed, all four toes connected by webs. STEGANOPODES. C /. a*, Hind toe, if present, not connected with the others. b?, Nostrils opening through tubes. (Extralimital). TUBINARES. b2, Nostrils not opening through tubes.’ | c!. Cutting edges of bill more or less distinctly fringed, notched or toothed. d?, Legs short or slightly lengthened; bill not abruptly bent downward. from the middle. ANSERES. D: d?. Legs excessively lengthened; bill bent abruptly downward from the middle. (Extralimital.) . ae ODONTOGLOSS 4. c?. Cutting edges of bill not fringed, notched, or toothed. e!, Legs inserted far behind the middle of the body, which, in standing position, is more or less erect; the toes webbed or conspicuously lobed. PYGOPODES. A e?. Legs inserted near the middle of the body, which, in standing posi- tion, is nearly horizontal, or else toes not webbed. f} Anterior toes distinctly webbed, tarsus shorter than tail. LONGIPENNES. B FR. Anterior toes not distinctly webbed (with rare exceptions); toes not’ ‘webbed; or webbed at base or on sides (full webbed only in « few waders with very long tarsus and the tibia partly naked). g. Tarsus more or less elongate; tibia more or less naked below. Waders. h), Hind toe well developed, inserted at same level with the anterior toes; the claws never excessively lengthened ; the space between the eye and the bill or the space around the eye, or both (some- times the whole head), naked. HERODIONES. E h?, Hind toe, if present, small and inserted above the level of the- rest (or else size small or medium, length less than 36 inches); the space between the bill and the eye or the space around the eye fully feathered ; no’comb-like teeth on inner edge of middle. claw. ‘1, Length over three feet. j'. Hind toe short and elevated. PALUDICOL®. F i2, Length under three feet. i), Hind toe almost on level with other toes. PALUDICOLZ. F k?. Hind toe, if present, short and elevated, or else claws excessively lengthened and wings spurred. LIMICOLA, G Brrps oF INDIANA. ’ 551 ‘g?. Tarsus not greatly elongate; tibia mostly entirely feathered. Not Waders. 1, Bill strongly hooked, with distinct cere at base. m1. Toes three in front, one behind. The outer toe sometimes reversible, RAPTORES. J m*. Toes two in front, two behind. PSITTACI. K 12, Bill not both strongly hooked and cered. n', Hind toe short, decidedly elevated ; ‘‘toes slightly connected at base by web;” no soft membrane about nostrils. GALLINA. H m?. Hind toe little, if at all, above the level of the rest (rarely absent). ‘01, Nostrils opening beneath a soft, swollen cere; ‘hind claw short. COLUMB&. I o”. Nostrils not opening beneath a soft, swollen cere. p!. Wings very long, with ten quills; tail of ten feathers; gape very wide and deeply cleft, or else the bill long and slender; (tongue ex- tensile); secondaries only six in number. MACROCHIRES. N p?. Wing not very long; gape not very wide nor deeply cleft; or else wing with only nine quills and tail with twelve feathers. g'. Toes only two in front; or, if three, the ‘middle and outer toes connected for at least half their length. ‘rt. Tail feathers stiff and pointed; bill more or less chisel-like. PICI. M r*, Tail feathers neither stiff nor pointed; bill not chisel-like. COCCYGES. L q’- Toes three in front, one behind, the middle and outer toes not united for half their ‘length; lower part of thighs feathered and the tarsus equal to or longer than the lat- eral toes. PASSERES. O FAMILIES. A. OrpEeR PYGOPODES. DIVING BIRDS. a’, Feet lobate. Popicipip#.--GREBES. I -a?, Feet webbed. b!, With four toes. Urinatoripz.—Loons. It b?. With three toes. ALcip#.—AuvKs, Etc. III 552 Report oF StaTE GEOLOGIST. B. Orper LONGIPENNES. LONG-WINGED SWIMMERS. a, Covering of upper mandible of three distinct pieces; a terminal hook, a lateral piece, and a cere-like piece overhanging the nostrils. STERCORARIIDE.—JAEGERS, Etc. IV a”, Covering of upper mandible of a single piece pierced by the nostrils. LaRIpz.—GULLS AND TERNS. V [Included in this order are the Rhynchopidw or Skimmers, the limits of whose range do not reach this State. The above key is not intended to include them.] C. Orper STEGANOPODES. DARTERS, PELICANS, CORMORANTS. 2. a. Upper mandible hooked at tip. 3. 61. Tarsus moderate, much longer than hind toe with claw. 4 ¢, Bill shorter than middle toe, compressed; gular sack small. PHALACROCORACIDZ.—CoRmMoRaNts. VII A.c?. Bill much longer than middle toe, much flattened; gular sack very large. PELECANIDEZ.—PeEticans. VIII <3 b?, Tarsus very short, not longer than hind toe with claw; wings and tail excessively long, the latter deeply forked. FreGaTip#.—Man-o’-War Birps. IX 2, a*. Upper manible not hooked at tip. Bill slender, nearly straight; tail long, feathers very broad ; neck very long and slender. ANHINGIDA.—Darters. VI D. OrperR ANSERES. DUCKS, GEESE AND SWANS. Characteristics the same as the order. ANATID.£.—Ducxrs, Erc. X E. Orper HERODIONES. HERONS, STORKS, IBISES, Erc. a’, Sides of upper mandible with a deep, narrow groove extending from the nos- trils to the tip. b>. Bill very broad, much flattened, and greatly widened toward the tip, only the end bent down. PLATALEID#.—SPOONBILIS. XI b?. Bill slender, nearly round, gradually bent downward for nearly its whole length, Isipip#.—Izisrs. XII a?, Sides of upper mandible without groove. c'. Middle toe nail with comb-like inner edge; claws narrow, arched, and sharp pointed. ARDEIDe.—HeErons, Erc. XIV e?. Middle toe nail with comb-like edge; claws broad and fiat, resting on a horny pad or shoe. Criconrip#.—Storxs, Erc. XIII ‘Brrps oF INDIANA. 553 F. Orper PALUDICOL. THE SWAMP BIRDS—CRANES, RAILS, COOTS, Erc. a). Size large; wing over 10inches; bill over3 inches. GRurp£.—Cranes. XV a?, Size small; wing under 10 inches; bill under 3 inches. Raturp#£.—Raitrs, Ero. XVI G. ORDER LIMICOLA. THE SHORE BIRDS—SNIPES, PLOVERS, SANDPIPERS, Ero. a. Toes with lobed webs on the sides; tarsus compressed. PHALAROPODIDZ.—PHALAROPES. XVII a?. Toes without lobed webs on the sides; tarsus not extremely compressed. b!, Tarsus more than twice the length of middle toe with claw. ReEcuRvVisostRip#.—Avocets, Etc. XVIII b?. Tarsus less than twice the length of middle toe with claw. c!, Front of tarsus covered with a continuous row of transverse, four-sided scales. Toes four (except Sanderling). d‘. Bill slender with blunt tip, soft skinned and sensitive throughout. ScoLopacip#z.—Snipg, Etc. XIX c®, Front of tarsus covered with small six-sided or irregular scales; toes three (except Black-bellied Plover). CHARapDRIIDz.—PLovers. XXI1 d*, Bill stout, hard, pointed and wedge shaped at the tip in our species. APHRIzID«#.—SurF Brros, Etc. XX H. Orper GALLIN A. PHEASANTS, GROUSE, PARTRIDGES, Erc. a', Tarsus with spurs in male; head naked or tail long and vaulted. PHASIANID@.—PueEasants, Erc. XXIJIT a?, Tarsus without spurs; head feathered (or nearly so) ; tail not vaulted. TETRAONID.—GrovsE, Etc. XXII I. Ornper COLUMB. THE PIGEONS. Characters same as the order. CoLuMBID&.—Picrons. XXIV a J. OrpeER RAPTORES. BIRDS OF PREY. a', Head entirely naked (downy in young); feet not adapted for grasping; nostril longitudinal. CATHARTIDZ.—AMERICAN VULTURES, XXV a”, Head nearly or fully feathered; feet especially adapted for grasping; nostrils vertical or roundish, 554 Report or State GEOLOGIST. b}, Eyes lateral, not surrounded by discs of radiating feathers ; cere exposed. Farconipz.—Fatcons. XXVI b?, Eyes set in front, surrounded by discs of radiating feathers; cere covered. c!, Middle claw having comb-like edge. Stricip#.—Barn Ow1rs. XXVIT e’. Middle claw not having comb-like edge. Busonip.x.—Hornep Owts; ScreecH Owns, Erc. XXVIIT K. Orper PSITTACI. PARROTS, PAROQUETS, Erc. Characters the same as the order. : Psittactp.—Parrorts, Parogvuets, Etc. XAIXN L. Orper COCCYGES. CUCKOOS AND KINGFISHERS. a}, Toes two in front, two behind; bill as long as head, curved downwards. CucuLipz.—Cuckoos. XXX a’. Toes three in front, one behind; outer and middle toes united for half their length; bill straight, longer than head. ALCEDINIDZ.—KINGFISHERS. XXXI M. Orver PICI. WOODPECKERS. Characters the same as the order. Pricip.z.— WooppPeckErs. NNNXIT N. OrprerR MACROCHIRES. WHIP-POOR-WILLS, SWIFTS, HUMMINGBIRDS, Erc. a’. Bill short, broad at base; mouth deeply cleft; plumage not metallic. 5%. Middle toe much the longest, its claw with comb-like-edge; gape bristled ; plumage spotted. CAPRIMULGID®.— WHIP-POOR-WILLs, Etc, NXXIIL b?. Middle toe not much, if any, longer than others, its claw without comb-like edge; gape without bristles; plumage black. Micropopip.2.—Swirts. XXXIV a?, Bill very long and slender; mouth not deeply cleft; plumage more or less metallic; size small. TrocHILip.—HumMinepirps. XNXV O. OrvER PASSERES. a), Tarsus with its hinder edge rounded. 6). Inner toe free at base from middle toe; bill hooked at tip, with bristles at base ; primaries ten, the first about as long as second. TYRANNID&.—FLYCATCHERS. XXXVI we Birps: or INDIANA. 555 62. Bill not hooked at tip, no bristles at base; developed primaries nine; hind toe with long, nearly straight claw. ALauDIDaA —Larxks. XXXVII a”, Tarsus with its hinder edge compressed. ce}, Primaries apparently only nine; bill not hooked at tip. d‘. Bill very short, flat, broad at base, deeply cleft; wings very long. HIRunDINIDE.—SwaLbLows. XLII d?. Bill not very tlat and deeply cleft; outer primary never twice as long as the innermost. e!, Bill more or less conical, broad at base. fi. Bill rather long, often longer than head, without notch at tip or bristles at base. IcTrrip®.-—OrtoLes, BLAcKBIRDS, ETc. XXXIX fr. Bill shorter than head. often notched at tip, usually with bristles at base. FRINGILLID.E — FincHEs, Sparrows, Erc. XL f%. Bill stout, upper mandible curved with slight tooth near the middle of the cutting edge; color chiefly red and yellow. TanaGRipm,—Tanacers. XLI e?, Bill not conoid. g'. Hind claw long and nearly straight, generally longer than its toe; tertials much elongated, reaching nearly to tips of primaries. MoTAcILLIp#.—WAGTAILS AND Pipits. XLVIT g’. Hind claw short and curved, generally shorter than its claw; tertials short, not nearly reaching to the tip of primaries. ; MNIOTILTIDZ.—Woop WaRBLERS. XLVI -c?, Primaries evidently ten, the first developed but short, rarely half the length of the next; or else bill hooked at tip. h1, Front of tarsus covered with transverse four-sided scales. i}, Bill strongly hooked and notched at tip. Laniip#.—SuHRIKES. XLIV. i 2, Bill not strongly hooked or not hooked at all. j'. Head with conspicuous crest; tail, in our species, tipped with yellow; bill slightly hooked and notched at tip. AMPELIDZ.—Waxwines. XLIII j?, Head usually not crested; tail not tipped with yellow. i}, Back generally olive green; bill slightly hooked and notched at tip; length five to seven inches. VIREONIDEZ.—ViREos. XLV k*, Back not generally olive green. il. Tail feathers stiff, pointed; bill slender, curved down- ward. CERTHIIDE.—CREEPERS. XLIX 12, Tail feathers more or less soft, not pointed. m}, Nasal feathers directed forward on bill, usually cov- ering the nostrils. n}, Birds of large size, length over ten inches. Corvip&.—Crows, Jays, Erc. XXXVIII n?, Birds of small size; length under ten inches (ex- cept genus Harporhynchus). o!. Bill notched toward the tip, very slender. SyLvup#.—KiIna@Lets aND GnatcatcHers. LI o?, Bill not notched. Parip#.—NvutTHATCHES AND Titmice. L 556 REPORT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. m?, Nasal feathers erect or directed backwards, not cov- ering nostrils; bill more or less curved downwards. TROGLODYTID/.— WRENS, THRASHERS, Erc. XLVIII h?, Front of tarsus not divided into scales except at extreme lower portion. p}. Small birds; length under five inches; young, not spotted. SyLvip=.—KINGLETs AND GNaTCATCHERS. LI p*, Larger birds; length over five inches; young distinctly spotted. Turpip#.—TurvsHEs, Ere. LIT A. OrpEerR. PYGOPODES. Divers. SuporpeR PODICIPEDES. Gress. I. Famiury PODICIPID. GreEBeEs. a‘, Bill slender, straight, rather acute; its length rather more than twice its depth at base. 61, Neck much shorter than body. CotymBus. 1 a, Bill stout, somewhat hooked; its length not quite twice its greatest depth. PopitymsBus. 2 1. Gexus COLYMBUS Linnaus. a', Wing more than 6.00; bill about as long as head. Subgenus Colymbus. 61, Length 18.00, or over. C. holboellii (Reinh.) 1 a*, Wing not over 6.00; bill much shorter than head. Subgenus Dytes. ce}. Bill compressed; deeper than wide at base. C. auritus Linn. 2 c?. Bill depressed; wider than deep at base. C. nigricollis californicus (Heerm.) 3 Subgenus CoLymsus. 1. (2.) Colymbus holbeellii (Rervu.). Holbeell’s Grebe. Synonym, RED-NECKED GREBE. Adulit.—Front and sides of neck rich brownish-red; throat and sides of head ashy, whitening where it joins the dark color of the crown, the feathers slightly ruffled; top of head with slight occipital crest; upper parts, generally, and wings dark brown, the feathers of the back paler edged; primaries brown, part of inner quills white; lower parts pale silvery-ash, the sides watered or obscurely mottled, sometimes obviously speckled with dusky; bill black, more or less yellow at base; eye carmine. (Wheaton.) Immature.—Above, blackish; sides of head with white stripes; fore part and sides of neck light rusty; otherwise as in adult. Birps oF INDIANA. 557 Length, 18.00-20.00; wing, 7.30-8.10; bill, 1.65-2.40. Ranee.—North America, from South Carolina and Nebraska to Arctic coast and Greenland, also northeastern Asia south to Japan. Breeds from Minnesota northward. ‘Nest, a mass of floating material fastened to reeds. Hggs, 2-7, dull white, tinged with greenish; 2.30 by 1.35. Rare migrant and possibly winter resident. It has only been re- ported from the northern part of the State, -where it has been taken in spring. Dr. J. L. Hancock, of Chicago, Ill., reports it at Wolf Lake, Indiana, in the spring of 1883, also at Park Side, Ill., April 29, 1883. Mr. Robert Ridgway (Birds of Illinois, Vol. II, pp. 259-261) gives it as a winter visitant to Illinois. Its summer home is farther north, mainly much to the northward of the United States. Dr. T. 8. Roberts (The Auk, April, 1890, p. 213) found it breeding in limited numbers in west-central Minnesota. It breeds abundantly along the Yukon River, where Mr. Robert Kennicott saw it and gave an account of its nest and habits. These are very similar to those of other grebes. Subgenus Dytes Kaup. *2. (3.) Colymbus auritus Livy. Horned Grebe. Adult in Summer.—Above, dark brown, the feathers paler edged; below, silvery-white, the sides mixed dusky and reddish; most of the secondaries white; foreneck and upper breast brownish-red; head, glossy black, including the ruff; a broad band over the eye to and in- cluding occipital crests, brownish-yellow; bill, black, yellow tipped (Wheaton); eye carmine. Adult in Winter and Immature.—Above, in- cluding top of head, dusky gray; sides of head and-lower parts, white; the chest and sides more or less grayish. Length, 12.50-15.25; wing, 5.75; bill, 1.00. Ranee.—Northern hemisphere, in North America south to Gulf States. Breeds from northern Indiana and southern Michigan north- ward. Winters from Indiana and southern New York southward. Nest, of water plants attached to reeds and floating on the surface of the water. Eggs, 2-7; whitish or greenish; 1.78 by 1.20. Regular migrant in some numbers, but never abundant. Some are winter residents in suitable loealities. In the northern part of the State among the lakes and marshes it breeds. Mr. Geo. L. Toppan has a young bird of this species, in downy plumage, taken at Sheffield, Ind., May 24, 1878. He considers it more common in winter. Dr. *Species marked with an asterisk (*) breed within the State. 558 ‘REPORT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. F. W. Langdon, in “Summer Birds of a Northern Ohio Marsh,” notes having taken two sets of eggs which he thinks were of this species July 2, 1880. They are known to breed in numbers at St. Clair Flats, Mich. Most often seen in March, April and May, October and Novem- ber. In the spring of 1883 they were more numerous in the Whitewater Valley than I ever knew them. They were found from April 15 to May 19. Prof. B. W. Evermann reports it from Vigo County January 5, 1891. Mr. E. M. C. Hobbs, Salem, Ind., has an immature specimen taken alive in a barnyard near Harrisontown, Washington County, about Christmas, 1897. In habits there is much similarity among all the Grebes. To this one, in particular, attention has been called be- cause of its habit of quietly sinking beneath the water, the bill being last to disappear, leaving no ripple to mark its place upon the surface. 3. (4.) Colymbus nigricollis californicus (Herm ). American Eared ‘Grebe. Adult Male.—Long ear-tufts of rich yellowish-brown; head and neck all round, black; upper parts, grayish-black; sides, chestnut; lower parts, silvery-gray; primaries, dark chestnut; secondaries white, dusky at the base. Young.—Similar, the ear-tufts wanting and the colors generally duller. (McIlwraith.) Length, 12.00-14.00; wing, 5.20-5.50; bill, .95-1.10. RancEe.—North America from Guatemala to Great Slave Lake; east to Indiana and Ontario. Breeds from Wyoming northward. Nest and Eggs, similar to those of C. auritus. This species is an accidental visitor or perhaps a rare migrant. The first record of its capture in Indiana was a specimen shot four miles north of Brookville by Mr. Edward Hughes, May 19, 1883. A second specimen was killed at Brookville, Nov. 5, 1886. These are the only specimens I have seen from the State, and I do not know that it has been taken farther eastward. Dr. Brayton says it is a winter visitor on Lake Michigan. Mr. Ridgway says it may possibly breed in Tli- nois. Mr. J. Grafton Parker has twice noted it in Cook County near the Indiana line, but he records it as extremely rare. One day during April, 1890, a flock of six flew over Mud Lake like a flock of ducks. He supposed he was shooting into a flock of ducks, and one fell, prov- ing to be a grebe of this species. He also observed one on the Calu- met River a half-mile from the Indiana line near Hammond. Mr. N. 8. Goss, in “The Auk” for January, 1884, pp. 18-20, gives a very interest- ing description of the breeding of about one hundred pairs of these Birps or InpIaNa. 559 birds found at Como Lake, Wyoming. He says: “The nests were in a narrow strip of rushes growing in water eighteen inches deep, and \\about one hundred and thirty feet from the shore. * * * * I collected the eggs from two nests, five in each; and counted from where I stood over twenty nests with from one to five eggs each. Quite a number of others were completed, but without eggs, and still others were building. The floating nests were made of old broken rushes, weeds and debris from the bottom, and were partially filled in and around the standing, growing rushes. ‘There were no feathers or other kind of lining. They were from five to ten inches in diameter; the outer edge or rim was from two to three inches above the water. The egps in several touched the water, and were more or less stained in their wet beds. The color of the eggs when fresh was white, with a slight bluish shade. The average measurements of the ten eggs was 1.81 by 1.20 inches.” The same careful observer notes that in leaving: their nests the birds would dive and come up quite a distance away out in the open lake and, when returning to their nests, would dive out in the lake and come up among the rushes. He says in no instance did: he see them swim to or from their nests, but adds, they may do so. when not disturbed. 2. Genus PODILYMBUS Lesson. a', Wing 5.00 or less. P. podiceps (Linn.) 4 *4, (6.) Podilymbus podiceps (Liyy.) Pied-billed Grebe. . Synonyms, WATER WrrcH, Dascuick, Diparrer, Dipivprr, Drprer, HELL- Diver. Adult in Summer.—Above, dusky grayish brown, top of the head darker; sides of head lighter; inner webs of the secondaries tipped with white; below, grayish white, everywhere spotted with dusky; chin, throat and a spot at the base of the mandible, black; bill, white, a black band around it at the middle. Adult in Winter and Imma- ture.—Similar, but lacking the black throat patch, and the distinctive marks on the bill. Downy Young.—Head and neck with black and white stripes. Length, 12.00-15.00; wing, 4.50-5.00. RaneE.—America, from Argentine Republic and Chili to Hudson Bay and Great Slave Lake. Breeds from Florida northward. Winters from southern Missouri, southern Illinois and New Jersey southward. 560 Report oF STATE GEOLOGIST. Nest, a floating island of marsh vegetation and mud fastened to water plants. Hggs, 4-7, whitish with greenish shadings; 1.72 by 1.99. Prof, Cooke notes (Bird Migration in the Mississippi Valley, p. 54) that it “winters wherever there is open water, from Illinois southward. and breeds from-southern Indiana, Illinois, Missouri and eastern Kan- sas northward.” It has also been found breeding in Florida. It has never been reported as wintering in Indiana, and is known as a migrant, or summer resident only in this State. Throughout the greater part of the State it is seen regularly, but not very commonly, during the migrations, and is, perhaps, more commonly observed in spring. The creeks, ponds, rivers and lakes are frequented by it. Where there is no water it is comparatively unknown. Owing to the screen of the season’s vegetation it is not so often noted in fall. Throughout the lake region of northern Indiana it is a common sum- mer resident. It arrives about April 1 and can be found in all lakes, rivers and muddy ponds until the early part of November. In Lake, Starke and Laporte counties it is reported as breeding abundantly, and sparingly in Steuben County. Mr. Robert Ridgway (Bull. Nuttall Orn. Olub., Jan., 1882, p. 22) reports it breeding commonly in swamps in Knox County. Prof. B. W. Evermann found it breeding “May 30, 1890, at Terre Haute. The following account of the nesting of this species near Sandusky, O., by Dr. F. W. Langdon, in his “Summer Birds of a Northern Ohio Marsh,” will give a good idea of the floating nest. He says: “I desire here to testify to the fact that the nest of the present species does float. * * * * The little floating island of decayed vege- tation, held together by mud and moss, which constitutes the nest of this species, is a veritable ornithological curiosity. Imagine a ‘pan- cake’ of what appears to be mud, measuring twelve to fifteen inches in diameter, and rising two or three inches above the water, which may be from one to three feet in depth; anchor it to the bottom with a few concealed blades of ‘sawgrass’ in a little open bay, leaving its circumference entirely free; remove a mass of wet muck from its rounded top and you expose seven or eight soiled brownish-white eggs, resting in a depression, the bottom of which is less than an inch from the water; the whole mass is constantly damp. * * * * The anchoring blades of coarse sawgrass, or flags, being always longer than is necessary to reach the bottom, permit of considerable lateral and vertical movement of the nest, and so effectually provide against drowning of the eggs by any ordinary rise of water level, such as fre- quently occurs during the prevalence of strong easterly winds on the Brirps oF INDIANA. 561 lake. A small bunch of sawgrass already growing in a suitable situa- \ tion is evidently selected as a nucleus for the nest, and the tops bent so as to form a part of it. During the day we invariably found the eggs concealed by a covering of muck, as above described; but as we ascertained by repeated visits at night and in the early morning they are uncovered at dusk by the bird, who incubates them until the morning sun relieves her of her task.” Mr. Ruthven Deane informs me that Mr. Hatfield found it breed- ing at English Lake, June 3, 1892. Mr. J. E. Gould, of Columbus, Ohio, took a nest at the same lake J uly 1, 1891, that contained nine eggs. The same gentleman, the latter part of the previous month, found several pairs of Terns despoiling the nest of a Grebe. The nest had two or more eggs in it, one was found in the nest and one outside. This Grebe dives forward very suddenly. Its motions are so quick that it often escapes the shots fired at it. It is often noted to appar- ently disappear. After diving it arises to the surface of the water and projects only the bill, the rest of the bird remaining below the water. It thus remains invisible. It is said to be able to settle back- wards and disappear from view beneath the water. This is done quietly so that the casual observer wonders what has become of it. The earliest spring-record from Brookville, and it is the earliest for the State, is March 17, 1884, and the latest first arrival from the same station is April 18, 1885. Mr. J. O. Dunn reports it from the vicinity of Chicago, near the Indiana line, March 23, 1894. Usually, however, they reach that latitude between April 1 and 15. In the late summer they begin to journey south in October, and a few remain into November (Hillsdale, Michigan, November 11, 1894), possibly until severe freezing weather. Suporper CEPPHI. lLoons anp Auks. IJ. Famiry URINATORIDZ. Loons. Characters same as for family. URINAToR. 3 3. Genus URINATOR Cuvier. a}, Tarsus shorter than middle toe without claw; wing 13. or more. U. imber (Gunn.). 5 a*, Tarus longer than middle toe with claw; wing under 12. U. lumme (Gunn.). 6 5. (7.) Urinator imber (Guny.). Loon. Synonym, Great NorTHERN Diver. Adult.Above, black; back, with square white spots; head and neck. glossy black, with violet and green reflections; a patch of white 36—GEOL. 562 REport oF STATE GEOLOGIST. streaks on each side of the neck, and one on the throat; below, white; bill, black. Immature.—Above, dark gray, feathers edged with paler; below, white, dusky on the sides; bill, yellowish green and dusky. Length, 28.00-36.00; wing, 13.00-15.25; bill, 2.75-3.50. RancE.—Northern part Northern Hemisphere; in America, south to Gulf of Mexico. Breeds from Indiana, Minnesota atid northern New England northward. Nest, a depression in the ground near the water, sometimes lined with grass and weeds. Hggs, 2-3, brownish, spotted and blotched with darker brown. Loon. The Loon is a regular migrant throughout the State in some num- bers. They sometimes remain through the winter, but most of them do not. Mr. J. W. Byrkit informs me that they are permanent resi- dents in Laporte County. He says they are sometimes caught by fishermen on Lake Michigan, near Michigan City, Indiana, “in gill nets and on hooks in thirty fathoms of water.” In the Whitewater Valley I have never found them except in April. That seems to be the month of their principal spring migration, though in the northern part of the State the advance guard makes itself noticeable in some numbers a month earlier. The movement southward begins in Sep- tember, rarely August, and continues through November. Mr. J. E. Beasley reports two specimens from Boone County August 25. Hon. R. Wes. McBride says (Proc. Indiana Academy of Science, 1891, pp. 166-7): “It is a summer resident of Steuben County, and breeds in at least two of the many beautiful lakes in that county. Their eggs have been taken at Lake James and Crooked Lake. I have been familiar with those lakes for more than twenty years, and have never failed to find them there in summer. I have also seen them in the breeding season in Hamilton Lake and Golden Lake, also in Steuben County; Brirps oF INDIANA. 563 in Turkey Lake, on the line between Steuben and Lagrange counties, and in Bear Lake, Noble County.” Mr. C. L. Cass notes it as-breed- ing in Steuben County, and Mr. W. B. Van Gorder in Noble County. Mrs. Jane L. Hine is informed that they formerly nested in Steuben County, on the point of land extending between the Twin Lakes of the Wood, also at Big Turkey Lake. In 1876 Nelson gave it as “very common winter resident upon Lake Michigan,” * * * * “of uncommon occurrence during sum- mer” in Cook County, Illinois. Mr. J. Grafton Parker says of the same county and Lake County, Indiana: “Although not common, it - is the common Loon with us. It can be found at Wolf and Calumet lakes during April, October and November, and until late years bred about these lakes.” In the State Museum in the State House there is a young Loon marked Zionsville, June, 1885. Mr. Stephen A. War- nie informs me that some breed at St. Clair Flats, Michigan. The Loon’s nest is simply a depression in bare ground, or a collec- tion of a few sticks, weeds and swamp vegetation on land, or some- times a depression in the top of a muskrat house. Its habits are very similar to those of the Grebes. It swims lower in the water, often with little more than neck and head exposed; is ever alert for danger; has come to regard every human being as its enemy; is rapid in movement, diving at the flash of a gun, and coming up out of range. The cry of the Loon is one of the characteristic sounds of the more quiet lakes of northern North America. Its weird, melancholy notes convey to those who have heard them impressions of the most lasting character. 6. (11.) Urinatorlumme. (Gunvy.). Red-throated Loon. Adult.—Blackish; below, white; dark along the sides and on the vent and crissum; most of the head and fore neck, bluish-gray; the throat with a large chestnut patch; hind neck, sharply streaked with white on a blackish ground; bill, black. (Wheaton.) Immature.— Lacking the markings on the head and neck; the back marked with round or oval spots. Length, 18.00-27.00; wings, 10.00-11.50; bill, 2.25. Rancs.—Northern part of the Northern Hemisphere. South in winter to South Carolina and southern Indiana. Breeds from Mani- toba and Labrador northward. Nest, similar to that of U. imber. Eggs, 2, pale green, spotted with brown. : 564 Report OF STATE GEOLOGIST. Rare winter resident and occasional migrant, breeding far to the northward of the United States. One shot from a flock of five near Brookville, February 28, 1883. That morning the thermometer regis- tered 10 degrees below zero. For several mornings previous the weather had been equally severe. ‘The canal, most of the smaller streams, ponds and the rivers, except where there were rapids, were -frozen over. In one of these open places the Loons were found. I am informed by Mr. Charles Dury, of Cincinnati, of a specimen that was killed near Chalmers several years ago. Mr. C. A. Stockbridge reports it as a rare visitor at Ft. Wayne. Mr. Ruthven Deane found one at English Lake, May 4, and another May 11, 1890. Dr. Langdon noted two or three in the vicinity of Cincinnati, and Dr. Wheaton says it is not rare on Lake Erie. Mr. Nelson says it is a very common winter resident upon Lake Michigan. Prof. Cook reports it from Michigan. The Loons subsist chiefly upon fish, and their flesh has a fishy flavor, rendering them unfit for food, although it is said they are eaten by the Indians. They also, while engaged in fishing, are reported to become entangled in the fishermen’s nets. Ill. Famiry ALCID.E. Avuxs, Murres anp PurFins. SupramMiLty ALCIN.Z. AvuKs and MuRRES. a’. Bill not very short; nostril concealed or enclosed in dense velvety feathering; secondaries tipped with white. 6}. Bill narrow: culmen slightly curved, both mandibles destitute of grooves; tail rounded, its feathers not pointed. Uria. 4 4. Genus URIA Brisson. a}, Bill under 1.60. U. lomvia (Linn.). 7 7. (81.) Uria lomvia (Lryv.). Brunnich’s Murre. Synonym, THICK-BILLED MurRRE. Adult.—Above and throat and neck, sooty black; secondaries, tipped with white; other lower parts, white; the cutting edge, towards the base of the upper mandible, thickened and extending outward beyond the edge of the lower mandible. Length, 14.50-18.50; wing, 7.45-8.80; bill, 1.45-1.50; depth of bill at nostril, .47. 4 Birps oF INDIANA. 565 Rance. Coasts and islands of the North Atlantic and Eastern Arc- tic oceans; south to the lakes of northern New York and the coast of New Jersey.” (A. 0. U.) Accidental west to Michigan and Indiana and south to South Carolina. Breeds from the Gulf of St. Lawrence northward. Nest, in communities on inaccessible cliffs. Hgg, one, pear shaped white, greenish, brownish or yellowish, plain or marked with blotches, or zigzag markings of brown and black. While at Indianapolis the last week in December, 1896, Prof. W. S. Blatchley, State Geologist of Indiana, told me of a strange bird that had been taken near there. His information was it was some sort of a Guillemot. I learned it had been sent for mounting to Mr. J. EH. Beasley, at Lebanon, Indiana, and that the same taxidermist had received others. Upon my return home I found a letter from my friend, Mr. Ruthven Deane, informing me that Mr. F. M. Woodruff, of the Chicago Academy of Science, had received a Murre from Indi- ana.