Conference on Methods Foremen's Confer Plant Control. Forenenship notes reached pu tives during a six . , —_— pas CG 14920 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS THE GIFT OF lynn A. Emerson Mise. 305 Sec. I - pg. 1 FOREMANSHIP NOTES { DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS REACHED BY PUBLIC SCHUOL AND PLANT REPRESENTATIVES DURING A SIX WEEKS' HONFERENCE ON METHODS OF CONDUCTING AND PLANNING FOREMEN'S CONFER- ENCES UNDER PUBLIC OR UNDER PL.\NT CONTROL. THIS CONFER- ENCE WAS HELD AT THE OSWEGO NORMAL SCHOOL, OS'TEGO, NEW YORK, JULY AND AUGUST, 1920, UNDER THE DIRECTION OF LEWIE A. WILSON, DIRECTOR OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION, STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ALBANY, NEW YORK. Section I Introduction Oswego, N. Y. August, 1920. Misc. 305 Sec. I - pg. 2 Preparatory Note These notes were prepared by Mr. Charles R. Allen and Mr. A. H, Morrison of the Mechanics Arts High School, Boston, as members of the faculty in charge of the conference, with the assistance of Mr. R. E. Keppel, as records of points discussed and conclusions reached. They have been reproduced by courtesy of the Division of Vocational Education, New York State Department of Education. In arranging them for reproduction some changes have been made by Mr. Allen to bring the information up to date on the basis of further experience obtained during the last year. CONFERENCE NOTES ON FOREMANSHIP, Misc. 305 Sec. I - pg. 8 Section 1. - Introduction These notes have been prepared for use in connection with a conference on Foremanship to be conducted under the auspices of the Federal Board for Vocational Education at Minneapolis, Minn., from July 18th to August 13, 1921. The notes in their present form have been developed from notes which were worked out at a similar conference held at Oswego, N. Y., under the auspices of the Department of Vocational Education of the State of New York, during the summer of 1920, and in their original form Were prepared by Mr. A. H. Morrison, Mr, R. E. Keppel and Mr. Charles R. Allen. In their present form these notes are supplementary material which will serve as an outline of points that may be discussed profitably in a conference, and that may also serve as more or less suggestive material. - The notes deal with the particular type of Foreman Training described in Federal Board Bulletin No. 36, parts I and II. They deal with the conference method not because it is not fully recognized by the Federal Board that other methods have been de- veloped which are serving a useful purpose, but because this particular method has been sufficiently tried out and has commended itself suf- ficiently to warrant careful consideration, and because its successful operation requires certain special knowledge and skill. The limited time permitted for this conference would make it impossible to take up all forms of Foremen Training. It would therefore seem best to confine the work of the conference to this particular type of work. These notes consist of five sections: Section I - Introduction Section II - Operating Foreman's Conferences Section III - Conducting Foreman's Conferences Section IV - Notes on Auxilliary Instruction Material Section V - Setting Up and Tentative Program A. Securing Preliminary Information B. Laying Out and Classifying Responsibilities for Thair Potential Interest Value on the Misc. 305 Sec. I . pe. 4 Basis of the Informatien as obtained. C. Determining the Most Desirable Conference Subjects Under the Limited Working Conditions...., Reference has already been made to various plans for improving foremanship. Since a general discussion of typical plans and other rela- _ tive advantages and disadvantages may be found in Federal Board Bulletins Nos, 60-61-62, that discussion is not repeated. It is assumed that among those attending this conference will be representatives of each of the following groups: 1. 2. 3. Individuals representing industrial plants, wh Have been connected with the organization for a considerable time: Individuals who have not been connected with an organization for a long time but who have only very recently come into the organiza- tion, or who will, soon, enter an industrial organization. Individuals (more especially State Office Representatives) who, in carrying on this work, will conduct a series of meetings on a given plan, and, at the close of these meetings will close their con- nection with the plant. Since each of these types of individuals will be confronted with a somewhat different problem, this matter is discussed briefly in the following paragraphs: 1. Bo The person who has been connected with an organization for some time, has the advantage of knowing the organization and having a considerable personal acquaintance with the personnel. This places him at a distinct advantage with regard to the securing of, or pos- Sessing, the necessary preliminary information as discussed in Section II,and it also places him at a distinct advantage in the Fapidity with which he can establish personal relations with members of the group. He will, therefore, probably be able to do a better piece of work at the beginning than either of the other two types of prospective conference leaders, On the other hand, in many cases he is liable to suffer from a suspicion that he is a direct repre- Sentative of the management, and to that extent be handicapped. This situation may require special tact and managerial ability on his part to deal with it successfully. The man whe has recently joined the organization, but who it is generally understcod is to be permanently connected with the organi- zation, has, in some ways, a distinct acvantage over the man who has been for a long time connected with the plant. He may also be subject to the suspicion mentioned above, but probably in a lesser degree. On the other hand, the fact that he is a permanent member of the organization will usually make it easy for him to secure free Misc. 305 Sec. I = pg. 5 discussion, especially in the earlier parts of the work. Owing to the fact that he is not well acquainted with the organization, it will require more time, effort and tact on his part to secure the necessary preliminary information, than in the case of the long Service plant man. The man who takes up the work on the basis of what has been called "Finish the job, pack up your bag and get out" basis un- doubtedly finds the situation which is the most difficult to deal with. He is green to the plant. It is known that he is not a regular member of the organization. He has all his preliminary contracts with the management to make. He is extremely likely to be Subject to suspicion that he is a tool of the management, especially at first, and he will almost always have that suspicion to overcome. If, as is pointed eut in the next section, he undertakes to make a preliminary study in the plant, this suspicion is likely to be in- creased to a marked degree, so that he is placed in a somewhat dif- ficult situation in securing certain information which he must have, and, at the same time "getting himself in wrong" in securing it. In a number of places in these notes certain procedure is de- scribed. These procedures are described primarily for their suggest- ive value. Probably an experienced man in this work would not follow any of them as described, but would modify them or would work out other methods of his own. In view of the fact that many men at- tending this conference have not had a wide experience in this work, it has seemed desirable to describe methods which have been used successfully in real situations, although the purpose in describing them has been more to present samples of the kind of thing which the conference leader should work out for himself, and to forma basis for discussion rather than to give a method of procedure to be mechanically followed. It may be noted that while the initiation of a series of fore- men meetings must be preceded by a selling job, the section on selling is at the end of the notes. For obvious reasons the ques- tion of selling foremanship courses will be taken up last at the conference. PROGRESSIVE STEPS IN SETTING UP A TENTATIVE PROGRAM:- These notes are organized so that the following Sections deal progressively with each step in the procedure,the object being to set up a tentative program. The procedure as here given assumes that the idea has been sold. The steps in the procedure areas follows: Starting with a fairly complete inventory of possible conference subjects,determine those that apply to the particular plant or plants under consideration. Select from this list of applicable conference subjects those that Misc. 305 Sec. I - pg. 6 have a presumptive interest for conference discussion. 3. Where working conditions set up limitations as to time @tc., select from the list of conference subjects having a presumptive conference interest value, those that seem most likely to be of the most value to the men and to the plant, when taken up in conference. As a result of this procedure there may be secured a tentative program based on the best information available before the conferences are Started. This program however will always be found to require modi- fication as the work develops, and should never be considered as some~- thing to be rigidly adhered to. Especially will it be found to be true that de facto interest is not always presumptive interest and that the information as origi- nally secured will be subsequently modified by information furnished by the foremen as the conference work develops. The fact that the foremen often have more accurate information as to many points than does the Management, or even certain foremen, accounts largely for the necessity of setting up a tentative program with the full expectation that it mst be subsequently modified as the work develops. Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 1 Section II Operating Foremens Conferences. Mise. 305 Sec. II - pg. 2 SECTION II OPERATING FOREMENS CONFERENCES PRELIMINARY:- . The preceding section discussed the necessary steps that mst be taken in determining the specific objectives on which the program for the series of conferences is based. Assuming this to have been done and a satisfactory program agreed to, and all other necessary preliminary arrangements made, the question that comes up next is as to how these objectives are to be gone at ,that is, the propogition having gone through the stage of preliminary planning now becomes a question of Operating, or of putting over the desired objectives. Since the effi- ciency of this putting over operation depends almost entirely on the skill with which the conferences are handled and the extent to which the principles of good teaching are familiar to the Conference Leader as well as the skill with which he applies them in carrying on the work of the conferences, this section deals first with some of the more im portant facts with regard to the principles of good teaching as they apply to the case of conference work with foremen, and gives information based on experience as to the methods of conducting such conferences; the uses and preparation of certain instruction material that, if properly used will aid the Conference Leader in putting across more work than he otherwise could in the time at his disposal, and with other in formation of general value in this connection. CONTENTS OF THIS SECTION:- The contents of this section aps arranged as follows: Part 3 A. This part gives general auxiliary information as to the general principles of teaching that will apply to any set of conference objectives but which must be applied in certain specific ways according to whether the objectives deal with supervision and management or with instruction of the character that a foreman may give under the conditions under which he works. Part 3 B. This part gives specific auxiliary information with regard to the conducting of conferences on objectives relating to SUPERVISION AND MANAGEMENT. Part 3 C. This part gives additional specific auciliary informa- tion relating to the handling of objectives relating to INSTRUCTION. THE JOB OF THE CONFERENCE LEADER:- (Ref. Allen, page 117)(And pp. 205- 207-208-209), As discussed in the reference a conference Leader in common with any instructor has the three jobs of directing, instructing and giving out information or telling. As a director he "Leads up" the discussion towards the determined objective, that is, he holds the members of the conference group to the subject under discussion. As an instructor he must put over to the members of the conference group whatever he can do that they cannot dojCwhere the objective calls for the putting over operation. Where the possassion of certain information is necessary for the proper carrying on of the work, and that information Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 3 is not in the possession of the members of the conference group, he must, an some way, impart or "pass out" that information. DUTIES OF THE CONFERENCE LEADER: Among the more important duties of a Conference Leader in connection with the actual putting over or operat~ ing the series of conferences: 1. Determining for each conference ways and means for handling the conference objectives, direct or indirect, as the case my be with regard to a. Determining his line of approach. (Allen p 165-168) and carrying the chosen line of approach out in practice. b. Determining methods and carrying the chosen method out in practice (Allen p 147-164) 2. Determining his group characteristics - (Allen p 248-256) and handling his work accordingly. 3. Developing the work with regards to the sub objectives as laid out on the planning sheet and the operating sheet. 4. Using the instructing operations (Allen p 117-144) ina form suitable to the organization of the group (Conference: Instruction) 5. Handling any instructing material effectively (F BI p 85) 6. Operating such system of progress records as may be called for. (Allen p 304-318) 7. Arousing and maintaining the interest of the members of the group by the skillful use of interest factors (Allen p 257-284) 8. Using an effective method of relating principles to con- crete cases. (Allen p 342-346) (FB, 1 pp 92) Wa t 9. "Cleaning up" as he goes along (Allen pp ) 10. Keeping to the subject. The majority of what can be Said on these points is covered in the references, but since the application to foremen'’s. conferences requires consideration of special conditions some discussions are given in the following paragraphs. WAYS AND MEANS:- As the term is used here it means ways and means by which the Conference Leader puts over the objective of the conference. In order to do this he mst be familiar with teaching "tricks" and know how to use them. - His objectives and his operating sheet give him Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 4 his general data - me mist "on the jobs" carry his program over effeo- tively by the use ef ways and means that is, by the use of methods and teaching devices. HANDLING OBJECTIVES:~ As already stated, objectives may be direct or indirect and the fwo types require different handling. A few sugges- tions may be helpful. The term is defined .F BI p 91. (a) Indirect Objectives:~ The only practical device here is di- rected discussion- An indirect objective is almost always "masked" by a direct objective, the direct objective being put over and the indirect being left to conscious or unconscious inferences by the men, For example, assume that the indirect objective is to get improved distri- bution of supervision through accruing interest in thinking out and using better methods. The “masking objectives" is to discuss methods of distributing supervision with regard to the application of agreed cost elements in supervisory distribution. An aroused interest in in- proved distribution of supervision and a desire to work out better methods involves an unconscious agreement that conditions can be improved The direct objective must be so handled that the indirect results must be a logical and inevitable result of the work and mst be arrived at by making each man unconsciously measure his present efficiency of distri- bution against new standards that he accepts as a result of the discus- sion. In a way the Conference Leader steps out when the "obvious objective" has been attained and leaves the men to take the last step “ander their own power". The success of this method depends on the Conference Leader holding to the obvious objective until he is sure that the men have "fallen" for the indirect objective. His best guide on this is to get an animated and constructive discussion as to ways and means for improvement, started and carried on by the men, and, unless he reaches this point he can never be sure that he has done his job. HANDLING DIRECT OBJECTIVES:= Here everybody knows what they are driving at as in the case of working out the departmental job analysis. It was pointed out in the last paragraph that after the "masking" objective had been attained the men mst take another step "under their own power". In handling a direct objective this last step is not required, but when the "obvious" objective has been attained, the final objective has been reached; no additional step is necessary. In a sense therefore the work of a conference always concerns itself with an obvious (direct) objec- tive - that is, the conference always knows what it is doing. What may be called the "standard" method of handling direct objec~- tives (whether there is or is not a "masked" objective) is to set up cases, preferably pulled out from the men, possibly with the aid of suggestive questions if nécessary. -This corresponds to Step 1 and sets up the "S,0,P.7 (Allen p 179 second paragraph). Step 2 is developed through discussion, preferably with “blackboard Duilding up" where that can be used, or sometimes by reference to charts, notes, or other Mise. 305 Sec. II - pg. 5 instruction material. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE TWO TYPES OF OBJECTIVES:- From the last two paragraphs it is evident that the essential difference between direct and indirect objectives lies in the way in which Step 3 in the instructing process is handled. If the objective is direct the Confer- ence Leader carries Step 3 through with the men. If it is indirect, he only partially completes Step 3, leaving the men to make the final ap- plication without its being directly suggested or referred to by the Leader. DETERMINING THE LINE OF APPROACH:- (1, a) This subject if adequately covered in the reference. DETERMINING METHODS:~ (1 b) This is also covered in the reference. DETERMINING GROUP CHARACTERISTICS:- The men forming the group to be handled in foremen's conferences form a group having certain character- istics that must be taken into consideration, among the more important of which are:- 1. As a rule their school experience has been relatively limited, in the majority of cases not beyond the grammar school. 2. They are men holding responsible positions and are mature. 3. They are intelligent and are capable of doing a great deal of effective constructive thinking if given a chance by the Conference Leader. 4. They are loyal to the Plant and are anxious to do as good a job as they can. 5. They are more used to arrive at conclusions by discussion than by reading. 6. In common with everybody else they are sensitive to direct criticism as to their having fallen down on their jobs. 7. As a rule their reading has been general in its character and they have not been in the habit of getting new ideas with regard to their working problems directly from trade publications. 8. On account of the practical nature of their work and their past experience, they naturally think in terms of concrete cases rather than in abstract principles. 9. They are men who, as a rule, have had a wide experience in industry and often a long experience in the plant in which they are employed. The Conference Leader must determine the degree to which the group characteristics just given appear in the group and, in addition must determine any other characteristics of any particular groups with which he may have to deal, such as Nationality which would have to be taken into consideration in such matters as the preparation of instruc- tion notes, use of direct or indirect objectives in given cases and so on. DEVELOPING THE WORK WITH REGARD TO SUB OBJECTIYVES:- The difference be- tween main objectives and sub objectives is that a main objective is Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 6 always a statement of some sort of improvement that it is hopedor in- tended will appear in the way in which the foreman does his job in the plant, as a result of the work of the conference. A sub objective is always a statement of something that it is intended to accomplish in the minds of the men during the conference. This something might be, for example, a néw way of looking at a situation, a new idea, changed attitude toward an old idea, or reversal of attitude toward a Situation. It may mean modifying a man's pcint of view, changing his point of view or even completely reversing his point of view, and doing it in the conference. Just as a production job is carried on by a series of opera- tions each of which gives an intermediate product, the final operation giving the finished product for that job, these operations being car- ried on in a certain order, each operation in turn moving the material one step nearer to the final job product, so a conference consists of a number of stages each of which gives an accomplished sub objective, the last stage giving a situation that is intended to result in the accomplishment of the final objective in the plant and these objectives must be accomplished in a certain order, The Conference Leader must therefore determine in advance:- a. What sub objectives will enable him to carry the con- ference through to the main objective in the most effective way and b. Determine the order in which these sub objectives are to be put over. In doing this he must take into consideration the type of the main objective, what it deals with (materials, operations, human factors, etc.). While no general rule can be given in most cases of management the first sub objective. is put over by the use of cases and the last by a discussion of ways and means, with such intermediate sub objectives as may be necessary. The main way of becoming expert in this laying out of subjectives is practice and so it is not discussed further here. USING THE INSTRUCTING OPERATION UNDER CONFERENCE CONDITIONS:- While the instructing operation is used under conference conditions undergoes certain modifications among the more important of which are:- a. Step one is minimized ~- The men are so familiar with the Situation that very little time is required to get their attention and get the conference "lined up" for business. b. Step 2 is carriedon by question and discussion and takes up a good part of the conference, merging into c. Step 3 which is handled through a discussion of ways and means. d. Step 4 does not appear in the conference, but on the job in the plant and mst be got by follow up work of some kind. Some dangers are: Leaving out step 4 entirely 2. Spending too much time on step l 3. Not holding step 2 to the sub objectives 4, Not "cleaning up each sub objective as you go. Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 7 HANDLING THE INSTRUCTING MATERIAL EFFECTIVELY -- FORMS:- 1. See that forms are fully understood before men are allowed to use them. 2. Always use forms on an individual basis. 3. Always check group work with forms while the work is going on. 4, Use some form as many times as necessary with each man so that it is certain that the objective (or aim) has been reached. 5. Where corrections and criticisms are made in the conference it may be a. Individual criticism and checking b. Group criticism of samples c. Criticism by Leader Of these the first two are to be preferred, and in general any criticism by the leader should be individual. 6. Where forms are used to make lay outs etc., all steps in- cluding Step 4 should be completed in the group. (Really a lesson in this case) 7. Sample forms can be put up to the group by the information al line of approach. Put into hands of men just before their use is explained by the Leader. 8. Forms that are to be used for outside work with which men are entirely familiar should be covered briefly in the conference. 9. Where forms are to be used by foremen on their jobs right along (for example, a checking form of man qualification the conference that the use of the form is thoroughly understood and that it can be correctly used. HANDLING THE INSTRUCTING MATERIALS EFFECTIVELY -- NOTES:~ 1. Always as a follow up 2. Never as on advanced text 3. Of the three types a, The informational type 1. Can be used to best advantage in discussion in the conference to avoid the necessity of continually repeating information that the man fails to apply correctly (Classifica- tion terms etc.). b. To give the man correct information that they can refer to in outside work where the Conference Leader is not available. ce. The Incomplete Discussion 1. Can be used as a reference in starting discussion in Steps 2 and 3 and to extend Step 3 outside the conference on the men's time. e. THE SUMMARY:- Used as a follow up and a permanent record of points agreed upon in the discussion and given out at a subsequent conference. Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 8 It is particularly useful in Step I of the second conference on the Same objective, that is, where the main objective is not reached in a Single conference. HANDLING THE INSTRUCTING MATERIAL EFFECTIVELY -~ POINTS FOR DISCUSSION:-~ Thinking points are often tied up with notes or cases and can be used to promote discussion in connection with Steps 2 and 3 in the conference, or +0 extend the discussion and bring about the use of notes in the men's time outside the conference. These points are of such a nature that the answers can be dug out. of the notes, but cannot be found in one place or in the required form. Discussing points are used to promote and direct discussion and can be used inside or outside the conferences, expecially in con nection with ways and means. Cases are used in Step 1 to arouse inter- est and in Step 3 to direct and control discussion. AROUSING AND MAINTAINING INTEREST:- In conducting the work of the con- ference it is necessary to arouse and keep up the interest of the men by the use of proper devices among which the following may be mentioned: a. Working out definite and satisfactory solutions of in- dividual problems. If the problems are of such a nature that they are of interest to only one or two men this can be done outside the con- ference. b. Always finish any objective that is started. A conference that does not arrive anywhere is not only wasted time, but results in loss of interest. c. Wherever possible, take one objective to a meeting. If, however, by miscalculation on the part of the leader, the objective is not put completely over in the meeting it must be cleaned up at the next meeting. d. In using cases for discussion or illustration, make use // of real cases drawn from actual experience. In many cases it may be necessary for the leader to supply these cases and then he mst be prepared to do so. e. Put plenty of "pep" into the meetings. Keep something doing all the time. If the discussion drags, "start something." f, Get a flying start in the early part of the conference and finish strong. ‘ g. See that every one takes an active part in the discussion. h. Pull out of the men what you want if possible and do very little telling. i. Make the men do the talking. If the discussion is con fined to the subject in hand, encourage it until you have accomplished the purpose you have in mind. PROGRESS CHARTS:- It is very desirable that a conference Leader should keep some form of record that will show him where he is com- pared with where he figured to beat each point in the series of con ferences. In practice he will never progressat the rate called for Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 9 on his planning sheets, sometimes he will be ahead of the game and Sometimes behind -- Stock in Process Equipment in Service Records and Reports ; Mon Fac xi JT} x [IIT] x IVix Voz V so oofe K jo----] TI --- fee of -- ek x VII ym AKA 4 XT) x it a 100 Ee a 14°15 16 171819 20 21 Ds OT OY J Co Some form of progress record, or chart, is therefore desirable. Of course such a progress record can be set up in a number of ways, but that given in the figure suggests one of the simpliest and serviceable forms. Headings are as on those parts of the graph covered by the specific program. Numbers indicate conferences, The line A indicates progress as planned. Roman figures indicate successive objectives as laid out on the Time estimate. Line B indicates the actual time cov- ered in putting over these objectivas. A program chart of this kind is best made large enough to serve as a wall chart. A might be black. Bred and the other changes and improvements will readily suggest the measures. Out side of progress charts no records are required except attendance if required. Of course no "marking system is called for". CONTROLLING THE CONFERENCE:- Among the more important things which the conference Leader must have in mind are: a. Getting switched off the subject b. Cleaning up each objective thoroughly as he goes c. Leaving any enemies in his rear , d. Getting into an offensive argument e. Getting into an argument that does not lead anywhere f. Doing all the work g- Working with one by che or two mon h. Letting the argument get outside the legitimate scope of foremen's conferences 4. Knowing the content j- Starting in without preliminaries k. Selling the idea to the men in the first two conferences 1. Keeping out outsiders (Manager etc.) especially in first conferences m. Overhead and individual distribution n. Mixing in Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 10 GETTING SWITCHED:- A group of men gathered together under conference conditions always tend to be diffuse and to wander from the subject and it is the business ef the conference Leader to counteract this tendency and to train the men to keep to the subject under discussion, This tendency shows itself particularly in the earlier stages of the Series and will continue throughout the conferences unless the Leader takes active steps to avoid the difficulty. Among the steps that can be taken are making sure that the direct objective is thoroughly under- stood in the beginning. The use of such devices as points for discussion, instruction notes and forms at points where they can be used effectively. Braking up a line of discussion that seems undesirable by introducing an anec dote or a joke and then returning to the matter under discussion, with she purpose of getting the men to forget what was going on before the interruption. CLEANING UP AS YOU GO:- Any conference calls for putting over a set of ideas (sub objective) or teaching points (if new material is being taught) in a definite order. One common error is not to "clean up" each point as you go along; that is, make sure that sub objective (on teaching point) A is completely put over to all the men before sub objective - Bis "opened up". Failure to do this means cumlative confusion and a lot of unnecessary time spent in steps 3 - "filling up holes" that should not have been left in Step 2. This means that the Leader has left behind either some confused men, which is worse. NUEAVING ENEMIES IN THE REAR":- In conferences of this sort there are always cases of men who are hard to convince and it is ad- visable te see that such men are satisfied before passing on to the next point. Unless this is done the Leader has failed to put over his objectives with these men and so far as they are concerned the conference has failed. As a result the men will be more likely to argue among themselves after the conference as to the value of the idea rather than to discuss ways and means of applying the idea. THE "OFFENSIVE" ARGUMENT:- The conference Leader must be careful uot to get into a position where, in discussion, he is apparently forcing his ow special point of view onto the group as a whole and especially onto any one man in the group. He must hold to the position for a "moderator" but not a special advocate. It is not up to him to fight for his point, but to get men in the group to fight for it because he has handled matters so that he has "militant converts". This is an error into which a plant executive is especially liable to fall if he becomes a conference Leader because he will unconsciously adopt the attitude of one who is used to having things done his way. The danger of setting up personal antagonism is also present under these conditions. This is bad, not only on the personal side but because one of two things is liable to happen. Either the man is "forcibly silenced" but unconvinced or the discussion becomes a case of "each nan fighting for his own baby" regardless of the merits of the two"babies". Mise. 305 Sec. II - pz. 1i THE ARGUMENT THAT DOES NOT LEAD ANYWHERE!- One situation that requires especially careful handling to avoid is where a discussion starts that leads nowhere. When such a condition gets under way it is somewhat diffictlt to "quash" it without giving offense or breaking up interest, for the men will become greatly interested in a "scrap" and as a result, interest in the real Subject of the conference may be broken up. LEADER DOING ALL THE WORK HIMSELF:- One of the worst errors that a con- ference Leader can make is to do the greater part of the work himself. The secret of effective conference work is to induce the men to contribute aS much aS possible while the Leader guides as little as possible in order to put over the desired objective. The result of too much work on the part of the Leader is to kill the interest of the men and consequently make it impossible to do effective work. In addition the Leader is de~ priving himself of the contributions of the men, which are extremely valuable in helping him to accomplish his purpose. LETTING THE ARGUMENT GET OUTSIDE THE LEGITIMATE SCOPE OF FOREMEN'S CONFERENCE: - The purpose of foremen's conferences is to improve the way in which the responsibilities of the foremen are carried out under the existing plant policy and procedure. The policy and procedure are determined by the management and do not come within the limits of the foreman's job. No amount of discussion among the foremen could change them and such discussion is therefore a waste of time, to say the least. More serious than this, however, it is "butting in" on the manager's job and is sure to bring quick and serious trouble. There is no surer way to wreck a series of conferences than by discussing such questions as wages, working hours and the open shop, and the Leader mst be ready at all times to steer the discussion away from such points. This does not apply, of course, if the management has requested such a discussion, but even under these conditions it should be made plain that the dis- cussions are no part of the series of foremen's conferences, They should, if possible, take place on a different day from the usual meetings and the regular conferences should not be omitted to make time for then. The danger involved in the discussion of questions which lie outside the job of the foremen is so great that it can not be too strongly emphasized. KNOWING THE CONTENT:- The Conference Leader must know what he is talk- ing about; that is, he must be perfectly clear as to all principles, classifications, etc., that come into the work, he mst, in fact, be able to do any "job" that he is going to get the men to do, and do it better. For example, in Job Analysis, he must be able to do a first class analytic job on any production job, or, in putting over the idea of instructing or telling or showing he must be able to do a good in- structing job himself. If cases are to be analyzed with regard to, say, time-power-labor-material-cost elements, he mst be able to make the analysis himself. If the point for discussion is "self respect" he wust know just what is meant by that term. All this amounts to saying that the Conference Leader mst know what is used in connection with put- ting over the various objectives because he is the man who must prevent Misc. 305 Sec. II - pg. 12 confusion of thought "getting switched" etc., and, if he does not know exactly where he is himself, if he is confused in his thinking, he does not handle things to best advantage under conference conditions. This means that the Conference Leader must "keep three laps ahead" of the men and not get “crowded off" by them. GETTING THE CONTENT:- The sources of information from which the Leader Can draw are of two kinds: a. Sources which supply direct information b. Sources from which he can secure information as to how to put over his objectives and aims. ae Sources from which the first type of information can be secured in- clude books and technical articles in trade publications, especially those dealing with production efficiency, personnel management, welfare work and instruction. A bulletin called "The Foreman" issued by the U. S. Dept. of Labor contains considerable material of this sort that may be of service. b. Another source is the procedure set up in the plants in which the foremen are employed. Still another source is the organization of these plants. Information in regard to cases that have come up in the plant is also very important. It:'might be well in this connection to gather a list of anec dotes and stories and classify them in such a way that they can be connected up to a situation that is likely to arise in the course of the work, and where, as already pointed out, they can be used to advantage. Although the conference leader does not and need not have a job knowledge of operations, processes, procedure, special plant teams, etc., it is necessary that he should have a talking knowledge of these things, in order to analyze a situation and talk about it intelli- gently with the men. For example, a conference Leader needs to know what the operations are for in a general way, how they are carried out, what sort of equipment is used, but he does not. need to have the know- ledge that would be necessary for him to carry out the operations. He needs to know what the operation is for, but does not need to know how to do it. MIXING IN:- The conference Leader must see that he gets the confidence of his men early in the game and that he does not appear to keep himself on a different plane than the men. He must be "one of the boys" in order to get them to talk freely and frankly with him both inside and outside the conference. In other words he must be a good mixer, and anything which tends to separate him from the men should be avoided. In the conference it is better for the leader not to get behind a desk or a table of his own. He should use simple language that the foremen will understand and should be able to use the "lingo" of the particular trade or industry. If he does not dress too well in comparison with the men it will also tend to make his "mixing" job easier. Misc. 305 Section III, Conducting Foremen's Conferences: Planning for Individual Meetings. Misc. 305 Sec. III - pg. 2 CONDUCTING FOREMEN'S CONFERENCES. SECTION II. PRELIMINARY:- After the conference objectives that are to be actually used in the working program as set up with regard to the working con- ditions have been determined, the neat step is to work out defihite plans for the conduct of edch conference. This section discusses this part of the work in some detail. The desirability of such planning is self evident but the methods so far as they have been worked out up to the present time require some description. They consist essentially in two operations: : l. Setting up a planning sheet outline with information as to main and sub-objectives, methods, lines of approach, and memoranda as.to necessary instruction material that can be used to advantage and that is available as well as other material, such as cases that can be used to advantage, ways and means that it may be necessary to Suggest, etc. 2. Setting up a program sheet. Convenient forms for these steps are given on the pages fol- lowing. MAKING OUT THE PLANNING SHEET:- THE MAIN OBJECTIVES: (F.B.36, I p. 91 to 92). The first step in the planning is to determine the main ob- jective or objectives that are to be dealt with in the conference under consideration. While it is, of course, possible to set up more than one objective for a given conference, as already stated, the tendency is to under estimate what can be done in the ordinary conferences time, (from an hour and a half to two hours) and to plan more of a program than can be carried out successfully in the time. In many cases only one or more of the sub-objectives, as discussed in the next paragraph can be "put over" in the time allowed for one conference. MAKING THE MAIN OBJECTIVE SPECIFIC:- In laying out a main objective the average person finds it very difficult to make a specific statement; the tendency is to make a statement couched in terms that are more or less general, and to that extent, vague. Particular pains should be taken to think through the problem and to formulate a definitely stated objective. This merely amounts to saying that the conference Leader musi know exactly what he wishes to accomplish; exactly where he wants to go. He may not get there in the first round, in fact, he may not get there at all, but he mst know exactly where he is trying to get. THE GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE PLANNING SHEET:~ The general pur- pose of the planning sheet is to serve as a memorandum to be used in connection with putting over the objective. It is made out without reference to time; the work called for on one planning sheet may call for one meeting; it may call for a dozen, depending on the nature of the objective and the work required to put it over. For example, when . the main objective was to promote more intelligent handling of cases of discharge and "rowing" on account of carelessness, so called, it re+ quired in one case four meetings to get the objective, the sub-object- Misc, 305 Sec. III - pg. 3 ives being, in that case, 1. Real carelessness vs. imitation carelessness. 2. Temporary vs. permanent carelessness. 3. The cost value of discharge for carelessness when the carelessness is temporary or not real care- lessness at all. 4, The Analysis of cases of apparent carelessness for the true classification. All of these objectives had to be worked up and "nailed" before the final objective could be attained. / DIRECT AND INDIRECT OBJECTIVES:~ (F.B.I, p 91). The dis- tinction between the two forms of objectives is clearly stated in the reference and needs no further discussion here, It should be noted how- ever that in many cases, in fact in the usual case, there are both direct and indirect objectives in a conference program. This is illus- trated in the program for conference number fifteen, page 48, F. B. I. This case of "simultaneous objectivas" makes, of course, a more compli- cated proposition for the Conference Leader to handle, but is one that.he must learn to "get away with" effectively. . LAYING OUT THE PLANNING SHEET: SUB OBJECTIVES:~ In almost all cases a main objective mist be worked up to through a series of sub objectives, one or two of which will often give enough work for one conference, There is generally an order in which these sub objectives can be worked through to the best advantage sometimes because one is simpler than another and sometimes because they "feed into each other". The matter of determining the proper sub objectives and the best order of working through them requires considerable skill in analyzing the situation in many caSes, especially in objectives where the human factor is involved, The sub objectives and their order should be carefully planned out and entered on the planning sheet. LAYING OUT THE PLANNING SHEET: CASES: In carrying on this work by conference methods it is of course the intention that cases should be pulled out from the men from their own experience. It will sometimes happen that the group won't pull, and so it is always advisable to have Some provision for emergencies in the form of cases that can be drawn on for this purpose and also for illustration. These cases should be carefully selected with regard to their concreteness, should be real cases and should be drawn, if possible, from the experiences of the foremen aS observed by the conference leader in follow up work, if that has been a part of the plan. The next best actual cases drawn fromthe actual experience of the leader and the last resort should be imaginary cases and these, when used, must be cases that could have happened. Some four or five cases of this sort should be noted on the planning sheet, not in detail, but in the form of a sufficient note to recall the case to mind. LAYING OUT THE PLANNING SHEET: WAYS AND MEANS:- Just as it is necessary to "load up" on cases so it is equally to "have in stock" ways and means, that can be drawn upon if necessary. This means that the Con- ference Leader mst have some general knowledge of such things as +ime-power-labor-material cost and of the general principles of handling people for "team" work, as well as some ability to see the application of these principles to specific cases and situations. A number of such ways and means should be thought out and noted on the plamning sheet. 1803 805 Seg. Tl] = oe, @ As in the case of cases these ways and means must be concrete -a- workable, And apply specifically to the situation or to the working out of the objective under consideration. To do this requires a general knowledge of plant conditions, but such examples of ways and means Should be used only to promote discussion and sometimes to "start Something", when the "pulling is hard or the discussion is not get- ting anywhere. They nesd not be the best methods and it may be desir- able to have "in stock" both good and poor ones. Theyconstitute a "reserve" that can be drawn on if needed, but are not worked up with the idea that they are to be taught as the expert way of dealing with the situation. LAYING OUT THE PROGRAM: THE GENERAL SUBJECT:- (F.B.I - Sec.II). In addition to the planning sheet as just discussed there is needed an outline or program for each meeting, showing the ground that it is planned to cover, and hence, unlike the planning sheet it is made up on atime basis. It is, of course, quite possible that the program as laid out for one meeting will not be covered, at that meeting, especially if the time estimating ie done by a "green" man, who will almost inevitably under estimate the time required for any given sub- jects. He may even depart entirely from his plan and be obliged to make a "quick shift" but he can to a reasonable extent stick to his program and he must do this without upsetting the situation. In most cases the general subject will be one of the sub-objectives on the planning sheet or at some stages of the game, the final objective it- self as it appears there. For example, in the case of carelessness on the job as cited in a preceding paragraph, each of the sub-objectives formed the general subject for one meeting and could not have been covered had the men not been so interested in the subjects that they stayed overtime to thrash them out. A general model for such a program will be found in the sec- tion of the bulletin referred to and covers the following items: 1. The general subject for the conference. This is not, of necessity, the objective, but is a topic that can be put on to notices, posted up etc., as in the case of any meeting. 2.‘ Sub topics leading up to the main topic. 3. Main objective. This is only to key the program on to the planning sheet. 4. (Operating data) Proposed line of approach. 5. (Operating data) Proposed methods for the different stages of the development of the conference work. 6. (Operating data) Instruction material available for that particular conference. Misc. 305 Sec. III - pg. 5 a. Forms, if any b. Notes, if any c. Points for discussion, if any d. Questions, if any Of course other operating data can be added if desired and the special form in which the memorandum is made up is of no special importance. It is important, however, for the Conference Leader to make plans in connection with: a. Where he is going and how he expects to get tee (Objectives) (Planning sheet) and b. How he proposes to handle the conference from the side of the use of teaching devices. LAYING OUT THE PROGRAM: SUB TOPICS:- The program as set out in the Bulletin illustrateswhat is meant here, and also show several possi- ble cases. For example, on page 49, (F.B.I) sixteenth meeting, there are two main sub topics, (a) Managerial problems in cooperating with equals and (b) Managerial problems in securing cooperation from the working force, both under the general subject of Cooperation. Each of these main sub topics would, under ordinary circumstances take time of one meeting, (The time as given in the bulletin is under estimated in this case.) and so should be set up as general subjects under cooperation. Each of these topics in turn would carry: (as subd topics) I. Cooperating with equals a. Approaching the other fellow's troubles b. Not knocking other departments c. Helping the other fellow out d. "Playing square" II, Securing cooperation from the working force. a. Telling the truth b. Giving a square deal c. Developing departmental pride d. Developing plant pride e. Playing no favorites Each of these sub topics "eating up to the general topic, (I, II) and these general topics "heaging up into the general question of coopera- tion. It is quite possible that even the sub topics as laid out for either I or II could not be covered in one meeting, but with an experienced conference Leader they should be covered in a two hour conference so that they have been "headed up" as discussed in the notes on "Handling the conference" or "Putting it over." The line of approach is given (as referred back to meeting 15) development because any improvement in cooperation mist come Misc. 305 Sec. III - pg 6 about through managerial work, not through supervisory work, because there can be no supervisory conditions between equals, (Topic I) nor will Supervisory methods help the situation in all its cost rami fi- Cations and got to thinking more intelligently about possibilities of amproved handling of situations as they arise. No rule or formdla ::,,. can be given in such cases. Hence the development line of approach, The method is given as that of development discussion because this is the only method that will serve under the conditions. Lectures would be of little or no. value because the men do not need information: What they need, if there are to be any results on the "check back" is a broader view of their responsibilities on the cooperative side and thought as to the possibilities of discharging those responsibilities to better effect for the good of the plant as a whole. LAYING OUT THE PROGRAM: LINES OF APPROACH:- This matter is fully cov- ered in the reference, (Allen, Chapter XVII, page 165) and needs little further discussion. It may be said in general that all managerial pro- blems and all supervisory matters calling for supervisory, planning call for the use of the development line of approach and since these are the majority of conference subjects, this line of approach is the more common one and the one that the conference leader needs to be able to use with the greatest degree of expert handling. THE SELECTION OF INSTRUCTION MATERIAL:~ The development of this work calls for the preparation of a considerable amount of instruction material of a Special type. The proper use of this material is discussed in the section on "Putting over the conference" and the methods of preparing it are also discussed elsewhere. These notes, in this section, only deal with a description of the various possible forms and their possible use to the extent that one type or another would be selected in connection with making the program for any given conference. In laying out of a program for a given meeting it is always a question as to whether any | instruction material should be used, and, if so, what form and type will best serve as a labor saving device, for that is all that any form of instruction material can possibly be. In deciding on this point the conference leader must take into consideration a number of things, among the more important of which are the following: a. Whether the members of the conference group can read that is, in most cases, get out of a printed page the ideas that are set forth there. In other words, "can they get the meat out of it?" b. Whether the work is at a stage where the use of some sort of a thinking guide will speed up matters or help in the development of clear and progressive thinking. c. Whether calling for a report in some organized way will help in setting up a situation clearly or will aid in getting that situation defined. 3 ad. Whether the development of the work has reached a point perth Mise. 305 Sec. III - pg. 7 where some outside work can be safely called for in preparation for the next meeting. e. Whether productive discussion can be promoted by cases worked out and given to the men on paper, either for use in the meeting or for outside work. f. Whether summaries of the discussions and conclusions set up on paper will help in getting the work done. g. Whether charts that can be hung on the wall for reference and that can be easily read from the seats will be of advantage. h, Whether information on paper will do the work just as well and will save the breath and the time of the conference leader. The above only suggest a number of the questions that mst be decided in determining whether any form of instruction material will be helpful for the particular subject and the objective of the particular meeting for which the program is being laid out. A considerable amount of experience is required to handle this question of instruction mater- ial efficiently and a few suggestions may be of value in this connection....., Misc. 305 Sec, III - pg. 8 Section ‘Ceri A No, of Meeting OPERATING SHEET Date_ Main objective Sub Objectives: i 2 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL. Cases. Points for discussion Notes. Line of approach Methods: Guestions: case: discussion Misc. 305 Sec. IV .- pg. 1 Section IV. Notes on Auxiliary Instruction Material. Misc. 305 Sec. IV - pg. 2 SECTION IV, NOTES ON AUXILIARY INSTRUCTION MATERIALS. THE EFFECTIVE USE OF INSTRUCTION MATERIAL:- In using instruction mater- ial in experienced conferences Leaders fall into two groups. One type of leader, espacially if he has an educational background tends to use too much and use it wrong, He tends to waht to use "textbooks", refer- ence readings etc,, in approved school style, as a rasult he usually is in danger of spoiling his job because he is dealing with a group of men who are not used to working that way, He kills interest, confuses the men and seriously impairs the efficiency of the conference work if he does not kill it entirely. The other type of leader, especially if ha has a plant back- ground, tends to go to the other extremes he usually has a contempt for "bookstuff" or "paper work" and wants to "talk the thing out." Of these two types the attitude of the second is undoubtedly the safer, He won't do mich serious damage, but he uses more time and gets less results out of a series of conferences than he would if he were to make an intelli- gent use of instruction material of the right kind. As already stated, instruction material is only a labor saving device, it has no inherent virtues, but labor saving devices are no more to be despised in confer- ence work than in production work, and instruction material is a time and labor saving device when properly made up and properly used. Improp- er material or preper material improperly used is dynamite and like only high explosive it is useful or dangerous according to the knowledge and Skill of the person who uses it. As already stated, the use of instruction material in the con- ference is discussed elsewhere. This section therefore memely describes the various kinds and types that experience in this line of work has shown can be of service if developed with skill and properly used. LAYING OUT THE PROGRAM: INSTRUCTION MATERIAL: FORMS:- One form of instruction material that has proved useful if used "with discretion" is forms, A form is merely a guide to thinking in a definite order. They are discussed in F.B.I., pp 85 to 83 and that discussion is not repeated here. A few suggestions in addition may be of value, fParti- cular attention is drawn to the following: a. The different types of forms as given in the bulletin b. The uses of forms ec. The abuses of forms A, Analysis and classification forms. A good example of such a form will be found in F.B. II, p.» 165, and another on page 167, second form, Forms of this character are chiefly useful in the "breaking in" stages of the handling of an objective, in getting a situation defined and in forcing a visualization of that situation as a starting point for a dis- cussion of situations. In certain cases it is of particular value in "follow up work" as in the case of the analysis form on "carelessness on Misc. 305 Sec. IV - pg. 3 the job" which is included in these notes as a sample of that sort ot aform. This form was used successfully in getting the men to do home work" after the matter had been thoroughly thrashed out in the conference, It would have been of no use under any other condition. B. Reporting forms. The reporting form can be used under similar conditions but only calls for a statement of fact and requires no powers of analysis: needs memory only. Hence it is one that is especially useful in the earlier stages of a series of conferences before the men have got used to the analytic notion and before they have developed any power of analysis. Good samples will be found in FB, Il, p 166. The partial form, or "laundry list" as it is commonly called, is a form of either type where the analysis or the problem has been completely worked out on a basis of possibilities and the men are only asked to check off what applies to their special cases. A good example of such a laundry list reporting form will be found in F.B. II p 165. This is, of course, the easiest form to handle and so is the most use- ful in the "breaking in stage of the development of an objective. LAYING OUT THE PROGRAM: INSTRUCTION NOTES:- The term instruction notes as used here covers all forms of printed or other reproduced material, including books, pamphlets, etc. As in the case of forms in laying out a plan for handling a given objective consideration must be given as to whether instruction notes can be used to any special ad- vantage in that connection, and if so, of what special type. F.B. II contains a number of suggestive samples made to that bulletin in the following notes: F. B. I, page 88. THE GENERAL VALUE OF INSTRUCTION NOTES:- The general value of any printed material of a descriptive character is that of a time saver or a reference. It may be possible to give to the group some thing in the nature of information that can be given in this way just as well as by word of mouth: it may be possible to give them on paper, Summaries of discussions and of conclusions drawn from them, especially ona follow up basis. It may be possible to start a discussion or set up a situation and leave the matter unfinished with the intention of getting the reader started and then leaving him to go on alone. In all of these ways and in a number of others there is always the chance that properly developed notes, or some form of "paper presentation" will save time in the conference for work that cannot be effectively done anywhere else. The value of instruction notes depends on the careful observance of the conditions under which such instruction material will be of actual advantage, and on avoiding conditions under which it will be a distinct detriment to the work. Among these conditions are: 1. They are worked up with the use of the right vocabulary. 2. Statements are direct, concrete, and apply directly to the matter in hand. Misc. 305 Sec. IV - pg. 4 3. They are carefully written for the special use that is to be made of them. 4, They use the language of the particular line of produc- ae which the foremen are employed; that is, the language of the plant. Unless these precautions are very carefully taken, the use of instruction notes, readings, etc., will do more harm than good. REFERENCES, READINGS, ETC.:~ Experience has shown that, for the sort of foremen's conferences considered in this course, the use of refer- ences to books or periodical is advisable. The work as outlined in this course is developmental in its nature and in its objectives rather than for the purpose of adding to the information already in pos- session of the foremen in the group. If conference work of the nature considered here forms a part of a general program for improved formaniz= ing, the time may come when, in what may be called advanced stages of the work, references and readings can be used to advantage. General works on the handling of men, employment management, efficiency produc- tion methods and so on are undesirable to put into the hands of the men, but are very desirable for reference and study material for the Conference Leader. Since this section deals with the question of the determina- tion of the sort of instruction notes to be used in putting over a de- termined objective, the special type of this material and the question as to whether instruction material is to be used at all in connection with that particular objective, the discussion here is confined to those questions, the questions as to the actual methods of handling in- struction material in the conference, when that has been included in the material prepared under the objective plan, such questions as to methods of handling in the conference are taken up in the next section. LAYING OUT THE PROGRAM: POSSIBLE TYPES OF INSTRUCTION NOTES:- Expe- rience has shown that several types of notes can be used to advantage in connection with foremen's conferences; among the more important of these are: 1. The straight informational type 2. The summary type 3. The incomplete discussion type Since a clear understanding of the different types is necessary in order to know when one type or another can be used, when any type should be used, the question is discussed in some detail in the follow- ing paragraphs. Misc. 305 Sec. IY - pg. 5 THE STRAIGHT INFORMATIONAL TYPE:~ There are certain cases Where straight information has to be put across to the members of the group, and when this information can be put down on paper and utilized under such conditions that the information is secured by the men, or where this information met be continually referred to in discussion or other constructive conference work, notes of this type can be used to advan- tage as time saving devices relieving the Conference Leader from taking time to present the information in a "talk" or a lecture. In conference work on Management and Supervision such cases are very rare because the members of the conference group usually have all the information that they need; they do not need more information, but need to think about what they can do with the information that they already possess. In group work dealing with instructional responsibilities the case is different because the foremen have little or no knowledge of teaching devices and a considerable amount of information must be passed out in connection with the work. For example, in handling the method of making the training analysis for job instruction, information regarding classificaticn headings and definitions can be prepared and used to ad- vantage in Step 3 of the lesson that the Instructor is putting over. An example of this sort of instruction material will be found in Allen, in the section on "The Determination and Classification of what is to be Taught". This section contains straight information only: it could, if desired be put over by word of mouth, but if used as a reference in Step 3 of teaching the men to analyze and classify the material of their trades, it is a time saver in saving the continual repetition of the information in connection with criticism and discussion. Another exan- ple of this sort of instruction notes will be found in F.B. II, p 99, paragraph headed "Mental Fatigue". A mamber of similar cases will be noted in the bulletin in different places. THE SUMMARY TYPE:- The summary type of instruction notes consist of a summary of the results if discussions or of conclusions arrived at and agreed to. An example of this form of notes will be found in F.B. II p 137, “Managerial Problems in Connection with Safety, points 1 to 4, which represent the summation of the discussion among a group of fore- men as to classes of responsibility in this connection. It differs from the informational type because it only gives summaries of discussions held in the group or groups for which that special instruction material was prepared. It is of course evident that summary notes of the type discussed here can only be prepared after the discussion has been cone cluded and the conclusions agreed to. THE INCOMPLETE DISCUSSION:- One of the most useful forms of instruction notes is what may be called the incomplete discussion. This consists of a discussion that is started and carried along to a sufficient point to develop the subject, put not to complete the discussion, thus "giving the man a start" and then leaving him to "go on on his own." A sample of the incomplete discussion will be found in F.B. II p 115, "How Mental Conditions Affect Labor Loss and Turnover. " It can be noted here that the discussion is started but that all the possibilities are not brought out and that there is no summary or general conclusion. The obvious ae of this paragraph is to "start something" but to leave the reader Misc. 305 Sec. IV - pg. 6 CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE THREE TYPES CAN BE USED TO ADVANTAGE:- A considerable degree Of skill and experience is required to determine when instruction notes can be used to advantage, and, where their use is indicated" to determine which type will give the best results. Nothing but experience and testing out will enable a Conference Leader to gradual ly build up a set of instruction notes that "function" effect- ively With the particular group that he is dealing with under the Special Plant conditions. The suggestive notes in F.B. II will work fairly well under general conditions with the general group of foremen in the average plant, and their use will undoubtedly help a Conference Leader to get Started, but they are incomplete, especially on the Human Factor side, and are more general than would give the most efficient results under specific working conditions. As has already been indicated, the general condition under which instruction notes can be used effectively is where without them the Conference Leader would have to spend time giving the material by word of mouth, with no advantage in using this method. This condition varies greatly in planning material for different objectives. For ex- ample, experience has shown that much material can be used in objectives relating to instruction in fact "The Instructor, the Man and the Job" consists entirely of instruction material successfully used in training mechanics for trade instructors. The same statement holds true for objectives relating to supervision, and to a somewhat less extent for those relating to management. The following paragraphs discuss some of the conditions that come up in connection with developing the different types of instruction notes already described. CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF INFORMATIONAL NOTES:- The general conditions under which informational notes are of value are where the information is in the possession of the Conference Leader but is not in the posses- Sion of the men, Under these conditions it is often possible to save time and effort by getting this information down on paper. This con- dition is likely to come about when the information concerns definitions, classification terms or other information that it is necessary for the group members to get. Under conference conditions, such as are consid- ered in this course, so far as Supervision and Management is concerned there is little chance for informational notes, but in work in the methods of teaching there is a considerable amount of this "auxiliary information" that can be set up on paper to advantaze. The great field for this sort of informational notes is, of course, in trade extension training, which lies outside of the field of the work discussed in this course. CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF SUM/ARIES:- Material: such as conclusions, general principles arrived at, and, in general, any sort of work that has been developed in the conference can, in many cases be subsequently set up in the form of summarized notes, which can then be subsequently used as references in cases of further discussion in the group, or can be kept by the men for subsequent reference. Out of experience with the first few groups material of this kind can be used with the follow- ing groups with little or no modification or by selection. Misc. 305 Sec. IV- pg 7 | CONDITIONS FOR THE USE OF THE INCOMPLETE DISCUSSION:- This form of instruction notes is the most difficult to prepare in effective form and is perhaps the most useful when properly prepared and used. The condition when it is serviceable is when, in putting over an objec- tive requiring a consideration of ways and means, it is desired to start a line of thought along certain lines, or set up certain typical sit- uations wuich it is desired to have the men follow out further "under their own power." THE CASE OF EACH OBJECTIVE MUST BE CONSIDERED:- As in all other cases of the determination of instruction material, the case of each objective r must be considered as a distinct case and careful consideration given ; i to the possibility of using any instruction material to advantage. There zi is great danger, especially in the case of green conference Leaders, of "forcing the matter of instruction material and trying to use notes where they will do more harm than good. Properly and skillfully pre- fos pared and properly used (see the next section) they enable more efficient | | work and the putting over of more work in a given number of conferences. INSTRUCTION MATERIAL: FORMS:- (F.B.I, p 85-88). Forms which are prop- erly designed and worked out can be made very serviceable in work of this kind provided they are properly used. They may serve any of the following purposes. 1. To guide the thinking of a man where there is a prede- termined series of operations to be followed, as in the case of making the analysis of the auxiliary information analysis in making a job training lay out. (Allen p 450-63). 2. To get work in such a form that it can be easily checked up either by the Conference Leader or by members of the group. 3. To force visualization, as in the case of production job analysis (F.B. I p 167, Departmental Job Analysis). 4, Where, the Conference Leader wants certain information in regard to the conditions as determined by each man's job for use in developing some sub objective in the conference. 5. To get everybody at work at the same time. 6, AS an aid in securing equal distribution of the assistance of the Conference Leader. TYPES OF FORMS:- In general there are two types of forms as stated in the bulletin (p 86 F.B.1) 1. Reporting forms 2, Analysis forms And either form may be 1. Complete 2. Incomplete. (Commonly known as a "Laundry List") Misc, 305 Sec. IV - pg. 8 THE REPORTING FORM:- A reporting form calls for information merely where the man has the information and has been thinking if it is the form in which it is to be put down on the form. An example of such a reporting form will be found in F.B. II p 166. Responsibility points on Material. The information asked for here merely calls for the exer- cise of memory, little or no visualization and no analytic work. (That is, the man can put down the information just as he naturally thinks it without going through any process of dividing it into its elements or parta). CONDITIONS WHERE THE REPORTING FORM CAN BE USED TO ADVANTAGE:- The general conditions under which the reporting form can be used to advan- tage are as follows: 1. As a “breaking in device" in Step 1 of the Conference or of the lesson, where instructing is called for. (As in the case of putting over the instructing process.) Used under these conditions it Servesto "Start" thinking about conditions on which the work leading up to the aim of the lesson or the objective of the conference is to be based; and to assure the Conference Leader that all men in the group have done this "recollecting" thinking. 2. To get a Situation clearly defined in advance of a discus- Sion 80 that there may be no question as to the facts in the case to "gum up" the discussion later. An example of this might be in providing a reporting form as to conditions of transporting stock to departmental Storage where wrong methods used there were certain high cost elements that were to be discussed and where the objective was to endeavor to Secure more intelligent handling of the situation. THE ANALYSIS FORM:- As distinguished from the informational form the analysis form requires a man to divide into its elements something that he has been thinking of as a whole. This requires more than mere recollecting because in addition, the man must analyze and the more familiar a man is with a situation the greater difficulty he usually finds in analyzing it. Hence it is really rarely of service in breaking in, but is much more likely to be useful in Step 3 and as a follow up on outside work. Under these conditions it often is serviceable. A good example of the use of this type of form for outside work will be found in the form for the analysis of cases of apparent carelessness on the job where this form was given to the men after a full discussion of cases and they Were asked to pull out Similar cases from their own experience and analyze them for the best method of handling. QUESTIONS AND POINTS FOR DISCUSSION:- (F.B. I p 83). A third service- able form of instruction material is Cuestions and Points for Discus- Sion. In general there are several possible forms of these among the more important of which are: 1. Cases 2. "Thinking points" 3. Discussing points Misc. 305 Sec. IV - Pe. 9. "CASES":- In many cases it is atime saver to set up cases on paper ye for discussion in the group. This iS especially true in dealing with objectives On the human factor side. Good examples of this type of points for discussion will be found in F.B. II, pg 172 question 8, page 176, questions 1, 3 and 173, question 7. In preparing such cases they mist be real cases, preferably ones that have occurred in the ex- periences of the men in the group, or in the experiences of the Leader in plants, or cases that he has observed in the plant. They must be concrete; real situations. Case questions of this type can be used in Step 3 and in getting outside work provided they are properly worked up to in the conference, (Discussed in the section on operating. ) “THINKING POINTS":~ These may also be cases but they are chosen because “a a discussion based upon them can be headed up into an application of a general principle and that application has to be thought out, because it is not immediately apparent at the first look. An example of such a case would be the following: A man had been employed for some time in trucking cans of paint with a two wheeled cart. He had to deliver at two points, half a load at each point. Instructions were to load cans for first delivery on front of cart and then reload before going on so as to keep the cart balanced. Instead of doing this he got a friend to ride on the front of the cart to keep the balance. Friend saw Foreman coming and jumped off the cart to get backonto his job, Load spilled, paint ran all over the floor. Man fired. Should he have been fired if the best interests of the paint were to be considered? "THINKING POINTS WITH NOTES":- Thinking points can often be set up in connection with notes. Examples of this may be found in F.B. II p 172, questions 6, and p 173, 3. In preparing material of this sort it is nec- essary that the questions be so framed that no direct answer appears in the notes, but that an answer can be "doped out" from study of the notes. In no case should such questions "carry their own answers". "DISCUSSING POINTS":- Unlike thinking points that have a definite answer, discussing points have no definite answer, in the sense that there may properly be a number of answers or even no answer at all. They are most likely to be of service on connection with human factor problems for which, in many cases there can be a guess at the answer, especially in connection with matters relating to satisfaction and interest. A good illustration of this type of question 6, p 176 F.B.II. Discussing points can be used to the best advantage in Step 3 and for outside work. In some cases they can be also used in Step 2 especially in connection with putting over an indirect objective. THE GENERAL USE OF INSTRUCTION MATERIAL:- Attention has been already drawn to the danger of using instruction material improperly and to the fact that experience and skill is required to know how to use it ef- fectively. The three great dangers are: 1. Using too mch Misc. 305 Sec. IV - pg. 10. é. Using the wrong kind 3. Using the right kind in the wrong place. and all of these errors are usually made by a green Leader. It is best =e go Slow in the development of forms, points for discussion and even instruction notes although this may mean covering fewer objectives or 6ven nov doing as good a job. Nothing can take the place of a man who knows how to handle the job and any sort of instruction material will not help him to put over a job that he does not know how to do any more than a good kit of tools will help a man to do a job that he does not know how to do. As tools for the "skilled man" they will aid him in doing abetter job in less time, that is all that they can do. GOING SLOW ON INSTRUCTING MATERIAL- The man undertaking to conduct foremen conferences for the first few times will do well to go slow with the preparation of instruction material. The material in Part II of the bulletin has been tested out and can be used successfully by anybody who knows how, and it is best to begin experimenting with that first before writing up notes ones self, and the same can be said of forms and points for discussion. On instruction, tested material like that in the references given to "Allen" or some other similar tested material Will prove the safest, at least till the Conference Leader got his experience. CHARTS:~ In connection with the handling of foremen's Conferences the preparation of charts will often be of advantage. These charts, if hung where they can be easily read from all parts of the conference roon, will often be of considerable value. Among the items that might be charted are: 1. Charts showing procedure, as in the case of departmental analyses (F.B. II p 78). 2. Charts showing specimens of work as it should be done, as in the case of analysis of responsibilities on given foremen's jobs. An example of this sort of chart would be those of the foremen's job enlarged from those in the Bulletin F.B.I p 99-107. 3. Organization charts for the different plants in which the foremen are employed. 4, Instructing analyses of jobs. Enlargements of such anal- yses as are given in F.B. 52 for the machine shop trade, or the analyses of pay roll jobs in potteries or in textile mills, or of jobs in the plants where the foremen are employed. Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg l- Section V-a Setting up a Tentative Program. A - Securing Preliminary Information. “Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg 2. SECTION II SETTING UP PRELIMINARY : - In setting up a series of foremen's conferences that will be effective and will really meet the needs of the plant or the plants in which the foremen are employed it is necessary to go through certain preliminary stéps with great care, and the final Success of the work depends very largely on the efficiency with which these preliminary steps are carried out. Sections ti, Tit and fv therefore discuss in considerable detail the preliminary procedure and give a considerable amount of information, based upon such ex- perience as is at present available, which it is hoped will be of aSsistance to any one who has the responsibility of organizing and Carrying On a Series of conferences of the type that is under con- Sideration. PROCEDURE: GENERAL DISCUSSION:- There are, in general, three methods of procedure that may be designated as the "guess" method, the "General covering method" and the "specific improvement method". As each of these three methods offer possibilities of work of some degree of effectiveness, but not of the same degree of effectiveness, they are discussed in the following paragraphs. THE "GUESS METHOD®:- According to this method of procedure no con- tact is made with the plant in which the foremen who are to take Part in the conferences are employed. It is assumed, as a matter of general knowledge, that there are a number of things "that would be good for any foreman to get", and a program is made out accordingly. Such a program may be made up in the library or the office of the person who is laying out the program from the study of books or other publications or from such general information as can be obtained from plant managers, efficiency experts, welfare experts, etc. A fair example of a program made up in this way, is the U. S. Depart- ment of Labor Bulletin No. 26, "The Foreman: A Treatise Upon the Qualifications, Powers, Duties and Relations of a Foreman in Mamu- facturing." This bulletin also contains an excellent bibliography in the subject. THE "GENERAL COVERING METHOD":-~ According to this method a contact is made with the plant or plants in which the foremen who are to take part in the conferences are employed. From the information so Secured an inventory is made of the general responsibilities that these foremen have under the particular organization of the plant or plants in question and a suggestive program is laid out that covers all of these responsibilities either from the supervisory, the managerial or the instructing standpoint or in any desired com- bination according to the special organization. Hence this method of procedure may be designed as a "general covering program" as it is so designated in the paragraph above. A good example of such a program would be that laid out in Bulletin No. 36, Part I, Federal Board for Vocational Education, Sec- tion II, "Suggestive schedules for Eighty Two Foremen's Meetings." Misc. 305 Sec. V-A pg 3. THE "SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENT METHOD":- According to this method a pliant contact is made with the plant or plants in which the fore- men who are to attend the conferences are employed and, so far, the procedure is the same as in the case of the "General Covering Method." According to this procedure, however, an additional step is taken in determining the particular points which for various reasons are believed to offer a base for conference subjects that are particularly likely to develop interest when discussed in con- ferences, and whose discussion would seem to be of especial value to the plants in question. No specific reference to this method can be given: it is not one of the more conmon methods and descriptions of it have not found their way into print as yet, at least, in any general way. Some suggestions in this connection may be found in F. B. 36, I, pp. 55, (standards for vocational courses}, (mistaken or undefined aims) 58, (unorganized work) 63, (conditions wmder which a train- ing course in any field can be effective in meeting actual needs). CHARACTERISTICS OF THE THREE METHODS:~ It is evident that the first method (guess method) is characterized by no plant contact and hence what mast naturally be largely a theoretical lay out: The second method, (the general covering method) is characterized by some degree of plant contact and a tentative program based on as complete an in- ventory as can easily be secured in advance for the job of a foreman in the plant or plants in question. The third, (the specific im- provement method) is characterized by the same procedure as the gen- eral covering method but, in addition, calls for a selection of conference subjects on the basis of their presumptive interest and ser- vice values for the special plants in question or even for differ- ent zroups in the same plant. RELATIVE VALUES OF THE THREE METHODS:- If the standards for effec- tive vocational training as set forth in F. B. 36, I, p 55, are accepted as valid, they apply to foremen's conferences as well as to other forms of vocational training and therefore the efficiency of such conferences will depend almost entirely on the degree to which they deal with specific situations that are actually arising in the work of the foremen who form the conference group. The closer the subjects discussed "hit a man where he lives" the more effective the work will be and the more the results of the conferences will appear in the form of improved formanizing in the plants. This is, of course, self evident. _A comparative study of the three methods of procedure shows that, measured by the standards just discussed, the "guess method", like all other methods based upon guess and not upon known facts, must be very inefficient. It is a case of "loading up the blunderbuss and shooting into the bushes. (Note here: Each method is discussed with points numbered 1, 2, 3, etc.) 1. In the very nature of things, it cannot deal with specific situations as they actually exist in a given plant. 2. It is not likely to lead to a program that deals Misc. 305 Sec. V-a pg 4. with situations that fall entirely within the field of responsibility of the foreman as he is in the average American plant, tut is likely to trespass upon the fields of responsibility of other executives. 3. Under many conditions the resulting tentative program is likely to contain, not what foremen actually need on their jobs, but what somebody not familiar with actual plant conditions thinks (or guesses) "would be good for them to know." rosea All this amounts to saying that a program based on the guess" method of procedure cannot "get down to brass tacks" and so must be inefficient. The second method, that of "covering all points" is much better in that it does, enable a program to be set up that deals with situations that are known to exist. It does however, offer certain objections from the standpoint of securing the most efficient results from a series of foremen's conferences, among the more im- portant of which are: 1. This method might be said "to get down to nails tut not down to brass tacks," that is it may, in the resulting tentative program, aim to cover all possible situations that exist in the plant, some of which have tut little potential interest value, and some of which have much interest value. It gives, so to speak, a "table d'hote" program to be worked through regardless of the personal interest of those who take.it. Where such a general "covering" program is put up, parts of it are pretty certain to be of little interest to any one foreman, because they do not “hit him where he lives" and this situation must, to a greater or less extent, reduce interest and hence the value of the work. 2. Since a program developed by this method deals with all situations regardless of their "emergency" value to the plant and to the foremen, interest will not only be less but the immediate value to the plant will be less and evidence of the value of the con- ference work will not become apparent so soon or so obviously. 3. Since, under most circumstances the working conditions prohibit carrying through a complete program it is particularly de- sirable that those points that are covered in a given tentative pro- gram should be of the most value to the plant and to the foreman. This is evidently not possible with a general covering program. The third method, (the specific improvement method) differs from the second method, (general covering) in that: 1. It undertakes to determine these points whose presumptive interest values are high and sets up a tentative program dealing with them first, undertaking then, if desirable, to deal with points of less presumptive values. 2. It undertakes to deal with these high interest points in the order of their interest values above an assumed reference line and of their importance to the plant. Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg 5. ADVANTAGES OF THE THIRD METHOD:- It mast be admitted that this third method offers certain inherent difficulties that do not appear in the case of the genera] covering method. These difficulties chicfly center around the fact that it calls not only for the de- termination of conference subject that apply to the special plant under consideration but also calls for an attempt to evaluate these points in terms of their potential interest values, so that, while it requires no more time or minuteness of investigation its success does depend on the degree of skill, kmowledge and experience possess-— ed by the conference leader. In spite of all these objections, the individual who has the responsibility of planning and putting over a series of foremen's coonfasences and who is on to his job will find that the third method of proccdure will pay in terms of interest on the part of the fore- men, more efficient results and more appreciation of the work on the part of the Management. WHY THE THIRD METHOD SHOULD BE USED:- The general reasons why the third method should be used were indicated in the preceding para- graph, in a more specific way they are discussed here. The procedure that leads to a "specific improvement" program should be followed for the following reasons: 1. If the program is effectively put over it will yield the "quickest returns" for the time and money invested. 2. The results will show in the plant more qickly and more effectively. 3. It will arouse and maintain more interest on the part of the foremen. 4. It will arouse and maintain more interest on the part of the Management, Since the guess method which was not uncommon in the earlier stages of the development of foremanship work is now largely superseded by methods of greater efficiency, and since the general covering method is already well lkmown, in view of the limited time at the disposal of this conference it has seemed desirable to confine the work mainly to a discussion of the less known specific improvement method. PROCEDURE IN CARRYING OUT THE METHODS OF SPECIFIC IMPROVEMENT:- The complete procedure in this case calls for the following steps in the order given below: 1. Secure the necessary information. 2. From this information determine the conference subjects applicable to the plant in question. 3. From these determine those having the higher presumptive interest value. 4. Consider the special working conditions. 5. Set up the best (most efficient presumptively) tentative program under the limits of the working conditions. 6. As the work develops, work out definite overative sheets for each of the proposed conferences. Misc. 305 Sec. V-a pg 6. Since each of these operations calls for a considerable amount of work, they are discussed in the following sections. 1. GETTING THE INFORMATION:- Probably the most difficult part of the procedure is the securing of the necessary information on which the list of desirable specific objectives is to be based. This fact is due to a mumber of causes some of the more important of which are discussed below, tt whatever the cause, the fact remains that the failure of a series of conferences is almost always due to a failure to carry out this operation in the procedare properly. Among the "success factors" in this connection past experience has shown that the following are especially likely to be of importahce. SUCCESS FACTORS IN SECURING THE INFORMATION:- It is evident that two Cases May come up in connection with securing the information: In the first case the man who sold the idea to the plant is to act as the con- ference leader; in the second case the idea has been already sold to the plant by somebody else and the man who is actually to conduct the work comes into the plant "green" so to speak. While the following discussion will apply to both cases, it evidently applies more direct- ly to the second case, since, under these circumstances, it may be fairly assumed that in connection with the selling part of the job whoever did that work is, as a result, in a position to lmow of sources of information and has made sufficient contacts to be able to use those sources effectively. However that may be among the more important "success factors" in securing this information are the following: 1 - Making the right contacts: This means getting hold of the people in the plant who can furnish the necessary information if anybody can, and who are willing to furnish it, 2 - Using the right contacts efficiently: This means that after having got hold of the right contacts, the conference leader must get hold of them in the right way. 3 - Getting results from the interviews: This means that as a result of the interviews with the proper “contact points" the nec- essary information is secured and this information is, so far as poss- ible, correct. 4 - Handling the interviews so that the way is left open for further interviews and checking up if the information be necessary. Since these points are of considerable importance, they are discussed in some detail in the following paragraphs. MAKING THE RIGHT CONTACTS: DETAILED DISCUSSION:- Granting that the information as secured in any preliminary way will be later found to be more or less inaccurate or incomplete, as already discussed, experience has shown that it will be less incomplete and more accurate in proportion as it is obtained from more than one individual, and is Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg 7 obtained from different persons having differént angles of approach to the questions under discussion. This is especially true as regards certain member s of the executive staff and some of the reasons there- for are taken up in the following paragraphs. THE LINE OF THOUGHT OF A GENERAL EXECUTIVE:- A general executive almost always looks at a proposition from the standard of general results; he is not in the habit of considering detailed ways and means, but, in a sense, he thinks in terms of objectives. He is likely to leok at a question from the standpoint of the general good of the plant rather than from the interests of any one phase of its activities. This is especially true in comection with the intangible phases of the matter{ such as the cost clements re- lating to interest, satisfaction, Zeneral questions of morale and SO One He is likely to be the first of the group to admit that im provement is possible and desirable and if he does not take that attituds it will block the gamc. Under ordinary conditions he is likely to be the one that will "open up" first, if the interview is handled right by the interviewer. THE LINE OF THOUGHT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER:- The General Mangger is accustomed to think in terms of organization and procedure and his "slant" is apt to be from that angle. He is the man who is likely to suggest ways in which the procedure could be carricd out more effectively if he "gets into the game" during the discussion. THE LINE OF THOUGHT OF A SUPERINTENDENT:-~ As distinguished from the General Manager the Superintendent is more likely to think first in terms of production and detailed production difficulties, because he is usually ncarest to the actual production work. He is more apt to think of possibilities for improvement along production lines and to "come back" in that field. He is also the most likely to be on the defense as to possible "low ratings" since, in many cases, the matter under discussion is directly up to him. He is, in the posi- tion of being asked to criticise himself, (if he thinks of the mat- ter as criticism) in the presence of an “outsidor" and of his super- iors. This possible "slant" should be taken into consideration by the interviewer. THE LINE OF THOUGHT OF A FOREMAN:- A foreman is morc likely to think in terms of specific cases that have occured in his own expericnee, and in terms ef the particular problems and difficulties that lic inside of his own department. The average foreman instinctively scts the welfare of his own department above everything elsc; he is, in a way, an individual list, hence his rcaction to any informing question that may be put to him will be to consider the effect of the point under duscussion on the success of his own special dopart- ment. CONFERRING WITH MORE THAN ONE PERSON AT A TIME:- If several persons are to be interviewed it is gencrally advantageous to mect them all Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg 8 at the same time if possible, rather than to take them one at a time. This is because, with several persons together, if they be~ come intcrested, one will check another, onc will make suggestions from his angle, another from his, and the mutual reaction will often bring out points that would otherwise romain uncovered. This is particularly truc because cach man tends to think from his own special angle as discussed in the following paragraphs. Of course much depends on the personal relations that oxist between the various members of the staff of the plant, and in spge- cial cases it might be that they would not "pull" woll together tut in general, under normal conditions, the "group" method for arrang- ing the interview is the better. Probably one of the best methods for securing satisfactory information from a representative group might be to sccure the forma- tion of a committeo which might well consist, for example, of the General Manager, the plant Superintendent and several sslcected forc- men. Such a committeo is likely to give to the person secking the necossary information answers to the diffcrent questions from the © diffcront angles discussed above, and hence the information as sc¢- cured is apt to be approximatcly correct. PLANNING FOR THE INTERVIEW:— Assuming that proper arrangements have been made and that an intcrvicw has been scheduled with desig- nated individuals, it is highly desirable that the pcrson who is to got the information should plan the intervicw in advance. Plant people are busy men and are uscd to doing tusincss with busy men; the more nearly that 2very minute can be made to count the bettor. Among the things that should be done in this connection are: 1. Plarming to follow business procedurc. 2. Determining cxactly the sort of information to be obtained. 3- Providing a sct of "samples." 4. Laying out what salcsmen call "the talking points.” 5. Making up a sct of illustrative cascs and illustra- tions. In proportion as the above points and others that arc csscn- tial are carefully workcd out in advance, the intcrvicw is likely to be of the most valuc to both partics. FOLLOWING BUSINESS PROCEDURE:~ Appointments shovld, of course be made in advance and the time and placc thoroughly understood, as well as tho names and positions of those who arc to be present. This is not only good business, but it is desirable from the standpoint of courtcsy alone to know with whom onc is going to do busincss. KEEPING THE APPOINTMENT:~- Tho appointment having been once arrang- ed for should be kopt, so far as tho “outside man” is conccrnod. He is the man who wants something from the plant man; the plant, man may change the time or place or even fail to kcep the appoini- Misc. 305 Sec. V-a pg 9 ment ; the outside man must, of course, conform to the plant man's time, tut he should be there and be t eon time. Only the very gravest considerations should lead the "outside man" to fail to be there or to change the time when qnce arranged for and then every effort should be made to notify as far in advance as possible and to be sure that the plant man gets the word, and the reasons for the inability to keep the appointment as scheduled. KNOWING THE SORT OF INFORMATION TO BE OBTAINED:- If the desired information is to be obtained Quickly and accurately the nature and character of this information should be carefully considered and planned in advance. A complete lay out of possible responsi- bilities arranged and classified so that the -information can be obtained in a definite way might be prepared as a part of the ad- vance planning work. A set of guiding questions might also be of use in this connection. PROPER USE OF DEVICES FOR GETTING PRELIMINARY INFORMATION:- Such devices as are described in the paragraph above have been success- fully used, but as their use involves certain dangers, these points are touched upon in the following discussion. Where qiestion forms are used it should be clearly under- stood that they are to be used by the prospective conference leader as a memorandum or checking list for his own use and not as a ques- tionnaire to be filled out by those from whom the desired information is to be obtained. Neither should he "fire" the questions at those from whom he is securing the information. Answers to questions should be entered as the prospective conference leaders own opinion or interpretation of the results of discussion. The same statements would apply to the use of a list of classified responsibilities. It will frequently occur that the information as received will be in the form of illustrations or cases and the desired informa- tion itself mst often be inferred from such illustrations or cases. The following are typical illustrations. 1. Dyed cloth while in departmental storage is faded on account of failure to protect from direct sunlight. A serious diffi- culty. 2. Foremen either fail to plan far enough in advance in get- ting in requisitions for material or try to carry too mch. Some difficulty. 3. A little difficulty in moving intermediate products from one operating point to another thus slowing up or causing temporary stoppage on intermediate operations. Not serious but susceptable of improvement. 4. Daily production reports are inaccurate and are not turn- ed in on time. This does not happen very frequently, but causes a great deal of trouble when it does happen. Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg 10 5. Some foremen do not keep on hand a sufficient supply of small tools and from time to time jobs are held up till requisitions are made out and more tools obtained from the general stores. 6. Foremen are expected to recommend types of new machines when there are replacements. When they do this they only consider the amount of production that they think that the machine recommended will give and pay m consideration to original cost or the probable life of the machine. As a result foremen feel that their recommenda- tions are ignored by the management and tend to make no recommenda- tions at all but merely "kick" on any type of machine that is pur- Chased. Replacements only. come up in case of absolute breakdown. 7. There are a good many cases of breakdown due to speeding machines above their normal rate in order to get excess production bonus, in spite of strict orders to the contrary. Foremen say that they cannot prevent the operatives from doing this. A cause of many discharges of good workers. 8. Foremen have the right to recommend discharge to the En ployment Department. This is a source of constant friction because the foremen say that the Employment Department does not sustain them and so "throws them down" before the employees. 9. There is practically no trouble so far as orders being carried out properly is concerned. 10. An operative who knows that he is going to be late arranges for @ pal to punch in for him on time. This has been a serious difficulty because it has caused a lot of rowing between the foremen and the time office, and between the operatives, the foremen and the time office. Posted notices threatening discharze do not seem to do much good. 11. Accident rate is high. Warning placards have been posted and foremen have been given a series of lectures on safety by the representatives of the accident insurance company. This does not seem to have done much good but do not see what else can be done. Situation regarded as impossible of improvement, and as the best that can be expected under the conditions. 12. Todls not returned to the tool room as soon as the worker - is through with them hold up production and make it necessary to carry an excessive stock. This is very common. * 13. Records of the Employment Department show that, in addi- tion to there being a large discharge turnover, the cause, as given by the recomrending foreman is, for 30% of the cases, given as careless- NeESSe 14. The plant has a medical department which has sent out a good many leaflets and notices with regard to self protection from disease which were intended to get to the attention of the men. Ina number of departments these did not reach the men tut got lost in the foreman's desk. Notices, if posted at all were not posted prominently. 15. On serial operations operatives on operation 3 will stay out when they feel like it and put the operative on the next opera- tion out of business, so that they have to be sent home because there is no work for them. Very common. Other forms and claissifications can, of course, be arranged, but however it is done the point is that some definitely formated Misc. 305 Sec. V-a pg 11 provision for recording the information for subsequent use should be planned out in advance. In addition, in considering any specific form of responsibility it must be remembered that it may be dis- charged in more than one way, for example by direct action, by recom mendation and by suggestion according to the special form of the plant organization the policy and the special procedure. Whatever arrangement is made for recording the information the form or other device should be filled mt by the interviewer and then only after the point has been fully discussed and he is sure that it has been thoroughly understood by those whom he is interviewing. It mst always be remembered that the interviewer Imows what he wants but the man or men whom he is interviewing do not know what he wants and he must put the idea over to them before he can hope to get any information that will be correct. SAHPLES:- It is desirable to prepare samples showing the use that is to be made of the information when obtained. Such material will often aid in putting over just "what the idea is" and what it is for. Among the material that might come in handy might well be an analytic chart of possible foremen's responsibilites, both managerial and supervisory, such as is suggested in F. B. 61, Appendix, a set of suggested programs as in F. B. 36 I, a sample of a graphical lay out showing high and low interest points and some suggestive instruction notes on a few specific objectives such as are suggested in F. B. 36, II. Any other material that may possibly be of service should be pre- pered in advance; while none of it, or only a part of it may be used, one never can tell how the discussion may go and it is well to plan for all contingences. Any sample prepared for this purpose should be very legible and so made up that their use can be quickly understood. ILLUSTRATIONS AND CASES ON TAP:- In addition to the "samples" just discussed it is also well to think out in advance and have on "tap" cases and illustrations, especially in connection with the human factor side of the work. For example, an illustration of a case where a fore- man failed to distinguish temporary from permanent carelessness, or an illustration showing how a foreman's assuming no responsibility for temporary illness may effect plant operating cost may be useful in help ing to make plain what is meant ty the foreman having any responsi- bility in that cornmection. LAYING OUT TALKING POINTS:- In connection with planning preliminary to an interview one tmpor tant point is to lay out what a salesman would call "talking points". Although in one sense the interviewer has nothing to sell in another sense he has to "sell" the idea of just what he wants and why he wants it to the people whom he is to inter- view. In a sense he has a regular "lesson" to put over; he has to educate, or "teach" them what he wants to get and why he wants it. While no definite set of "talking points" can be set up because condi- tions vary so greatly the following may be suggestive. Mise. 305 Sec. V-a pg 12 1. The purpose for which the information is desired. 2. How it is to be used. 3. Why specific information is necessary. 4. Why a Conference line is asked for. . 5. Why the probable interest value of points is asked for. 6. That all information will be considered as confidential and is not to be made public. 7, That all information as worked up and the program devel- oped from it will, if desired, be submitted back to the plant before any use is made of it. 8. That the only purpose is to see if any form of foreman's conferences will be of service to the plant. (If a school man that the question of plant control vs public control is of no importance). CARRYING ON THE INTERVIEW:~ In the actual carrying on of the inter- view there are certain "operating factors" that are worth discussion among which are: ae "Talking business." . De tting over one "talking point" at a time. c. Getting right at the point. d. Sticking to it till it is clearly understood. ee Talking imporvement, not criticism. f. Taking as little time as possible. g- Bearing in mind the line of thought of the other fellows. Since all of these points are important they are discussed in the following paragraphs. "TALKING BUSINESS":- An individual carrying on an interview of this character, especially if he is not a business man, is likely to be too general in his handling of the situation, especially at first. If he is an educational man he is likely to attempt too much in the way of what may be called "seneral preparation." For example, there is no need in going back to the Bulletins of the Federal Board, or the need for foreman training, or the advantages of better formanizing in American industry. Under proper conditions the idea of the value of foremen's conferences has either been already sold to the plant repre- sentatives or the meeting with the plant representatives is for the purpose of enabling them to give to the interviewer information that they are giving merely as a matter of cooperation of courtesy. In either case the effective method of carrying on the interview is to “talk business" and "stick to business" during the interview. The value of previous planning will come out here because in proportion as the interviewer gives evidence that he knows what he is talking about, knows just what he wants and goes for it, he will command the attention and interest of the plant representatives, In proportion as he gives evidence that he is vague as to what he wants and is just "sloshing around" the plant men will be liable to feel that they. are wasting their time, and will begin to Wonder what he is there for anyway. Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 13 In all this work the importance of being "natural" cannot be too strongly emphasized. The personality of the interviewer and the degree to which he is what is commonly called a "good mixed" is one of the rost important factors affecting the success of the inter- view so far as productive results are concerned. This is especially true when the interviewer has only an educational background and experience and is liable to adopt unconsciously more or less of a categorical attitude and mannerisms characteristic of the school room, but not found among industrial people. As a result the plant «Tepresentatives are liable to be made to feel that they and the interviewer have little or nothing in common and that the educational man cannot possibly have anything that will be of real value to the business. Under these conditions they are liable, and even likely to treat the whole interview merely as an academic matter and to feel that the whole thing is merely a matter of courtesy but something in which they have no real interest. Out of this comes the fact that an industrial or business experience of some kind is a great help to the interviewer if he shows it in his manner or casually brings it out early in the interview. It is important to use what may be called the "conversational" method rather than the "catacgorical" method during the interview. The material prepared for noting the information, (forms, questionnaires, etc. whatever they are), should be kept in the background and only used after the discussion has settled the point in question, and then the act of noting down should be made as casual as possible. A question such as "Well, that seems clear, shall we put it down this way?" will sometimes help to make this casual notation possible. In zeneral it may be said that the more the interview sugzests a business conversation in a club and the less it suctests a cross examination in a court room ar an interview with a census taker, the better. GETTING TO THE POINT AND STAYING THERE:- The information required mst, of course, be taken up point by point, and not as a general "mess". In carrying on the interview each point must be made plain first and then adhered to until it is cleared up. This is likely to be difficult, especially during the earlier part of the interview, because it is then that the plant representative naturally knows the least about what the interviewer is driving at. If the interviewer has not done a good job at the beginninz, as will sometimes happen, it may be necessay to "back check" on this earlier part before closing the interview, but this is not desirable if it can be avoided. As already stated much depends upon the dezree to which the interviewer knows hiw job and has plarmed for it in ad- vance. Going over the thing again and again is poor practice because it tends to cause confusion of mind and breaks down the interest. Of course, if the plant men begin to “back track" by thinkine of more in- formation on points already covered on the first round, the interviewer must go with them. Sometimes this is a good sien if Mise, 305 Sec. V-a 14 plant men, but such "back tracking" should not come from the inter- viewer. If the plant men want to go back, all right, go with them, but don't drag them back if you can help it. USE OF THE SUGGESTIVE QUESTION:~ If the interviewer knows how to use it, the sugsestive question can be used to creat advantase in this work. For example, on the qestion of responsibility for raw departmental stock a plant man will almost always say "no" "the first dash out of the box." Such a question as "But doesn't he have any stock in his department waiting to go into operations or processes on the floor or somewhere" will zenerally bring out the reply "Yes, of course." A further question such as: "If any thing happened to that stock, say somebody stole it, would the foreman have a good alibi?" will almost always bring the answer equivalent to "You bet your life he wouldn't." Which would brinc out the point that the foreman did have responsibilities in that connection, thouch, at first, the statement was made in tood faith that he had none. Again, it is common for the statement to be made at first that foremen have no responsibility for discharzin> workers because "the Employment Department attends to that", when a sucgestive question will brinz out the fact that foremen do recommend discharze, and hence have a responsibility for usinc that recommending function intelli-ently. In all cases the Jegree to which the interviewer will suc- ceed in zettinz the information as to real facts of the case will depend on his courtesy and tact and the dezree to which he can "pull out" the information successfully. By the pure categorical method, aside from its unidegirability for reasons already discussed, he will cet little information that will show the real facts of the Cases Of course no definite rules can be given for handling a given interview; a man must deal with the situation as he finds it and adapt himself to it, and to the characteristics of the people with whom he has to deal, but sugzestions made above, beinz based upon general experience, should be of suggestive value. TALKING IMPROVEMENT: NOT CRITICISM:- The question of securing a rating sets up one of the most difficult parts of the interview, A Superintendent, for example, is, as a rule, reluctant to admit that "everything is not all right," and this is natural, because an admission that thinzs are not all rizht seems, especially at first, to imply a criticism on the way that he has been handling his work. The tactics here are to talk improvement and not criticism. If the line of thought can be directed toward whether the situation could be improved and ways and means of possible improvement can be suggested, the plant man will then often be much more willing to sive a rating and to set up his “dead line." Misc. 305 Sec. Vea a5 TAKING AS LITTLE TIME AS POSSIBLE BUT GETTING THE JOB DONE:- With regard to the time taken up in the interview there are some points that are worth mentioning. Among these are the following: 1. Not prolonging the interview to the point of fatisue or holding a man after he "begins to look at his watch." When these symptoms begin to appear, if the ob is not finished it is better to arranze for another nterview to finish it. 2. Doing the job in as little time as possible. 3. Finishing the job before "letting go." LEAVING A GOOD IMPRESSION:- One necessary mrtcome of the intervicw is that it should leave a good impression. In many cases on further consideration, if interest has been aroused, those who were at the conference will think of something additional or the interviewer, on working up the information obtained will require further information. If relations have been established so that the matter can be followed up easily, and if the interest of the plant men has been gained so that they are willinz and anxious to cooperate, if this situation results from the first conference, a very desirable condition has been brousht about. If om the other hand, the condition is such that the plant men feel that they have done what was decent but have no further interest in the matter, the question of a followup, if that should be necessary, will be more difficult. It may almost be said that any satisfactory initial interview should bring out an invitation to come again to go through the plant and that a failure to receive such an invitation would indicate, under ordinary circumstances, that the in- terview was not as successful as mizht have been wished. GOING BACK FOR MORE:- There is no question but what in many cases all necessary information will not have been secured at the first interviews in spite of careful planning and effort. When the infor- mation as secured is worked up it will often appear that some points require further analysis or need further "diecines out." This probabil- ity makes it especially desirable to leave thinzs so that "the latch string is out" at the plant. On “going back for more" the same prin~ ciples apply as already discussed. Know what is wanted and make the least possible trouble in getting it, tut get it. If the proper relations have been established this should not be difficult. The need for more information will usually appear in connection with the work of gettinz out the specifications as discussed in the next sec- tion. RESULTS TO BE SECURED FROM THIS PROCEDURE:— The purpose of the pro- cedure outlined below is to secure information on which a tentative program can be developed. The setting up of such a tentative prozram Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 16 is of considerable value althouch it is exreedingly improbable that as the conference work develops the program as orizinally set up will be adhered to. Amonz the reasons why such a tentative prozram is of avlue are the following: ; 1. It Helps to convince the Management that a specific improvement program and not a general procram is contemplated, 2. It gets the Management interested from the start by pulling them into the came. 3. It ghves the conférence leader something to zo on until he has fowmd his feet. 4. Under many conditions such a tentative protram is of value for placinz in the hands of the men either before the first meetin; or at the first meetins, to give them a seneral idea of the sort of work that is proposed. 5s Where the conference leader does not belon- to the plant orcanization, this procedure gives him a certain amount of back- ground to start on and sets up workins relations with the Management. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THIS PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE:- While the reasons given “above for followin> this procedure are sound, nevertheless it is subject to certain danzers that should be berne in mind. Among the more important of these are the following:- 1. There is often a greater or less attitude of suspicion on the part of some oF all of the foremen as to the real purpose for which the conferences are to be held: they suspect that there is some ulterior motive on the part of the Management. Under these conditions if the fact that the conference leader has been in close consultation with the Management becomes known, (as it will) the job of the conference leader will be made more difficult during the first few meetings, or until this suspicion is dispelled. 2. The preliminary information upon which a tentative prozram is based is likely to be more of a reflection of the wishes or the attitude of the management rather than of the actual facts. Accurate information of the character which will be drawn out from the foremen as the work of the conference develops, and which is in- valuable in relation to the planning for subsequent meetings, is par- ticularly hard to sdéoure in advance. 3. The preliminary or advance information is cenerally ob- tained from a LIMITED muomber of plant officials or executives. The actual inside plant information, derived as the work procresses, will usually represent the combined opinions of a larger mumber of individuals. For this reason, the advance information will probably be less repregentative of actual plant conditions than micht be as- sumed “in the beginning. The foreman, likewise looks at his job and his problems from an anzle quite different from that of the plant executive. 4. Experience seems to indicate that foremen, generally, Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 17 are likely to "Open up" and talk more freely concerninz their jobs, if the conference leader has not been seen makinz a preliminary study of conditions in the plant. Considerinc the sreat mumber of possible subjects that can be set up for a series of foremens conferences it is evident that a man cannot afford to start in with no program at all. On the other hand, if, in securinz the information necessary to enable him to make a selection for a tentative program he does not succeed in avoiding ° or at least minimizing the danzers noted atove, his work will be se- riously handicapped for some time at least. Whatever method may be adopted,the leader must at least se- Gure sufficient information to enable him to determine what of the possible subjects have a possible conference value for the particular Plant under consideration. This information mst in some way be se- cured throuch conference with plant representatives. These repre- sentatives may, of course be drawn from the ceneral manazement, from the foremen themselves, or preferably, from a mixed group. ADDITIONAL GENERAL PLANT INFORMATION:- Quite aside from the question just discussed, it is hichly desirable that a conference leader should possess certain ceneral information with regard to the special Plant under consideration. Some of the more important of these items are: 1. In a seneral way somethin-= of the character of the pro- ducts turned out by the plant, especially whether mechanically or chem- ically produced. 2. The departmental order in terms of material flow. 3. "Who's who" in the organization. 4. Whether the plant is closed or open shop. Misc. 305. Sec. V-a 18 FOREMENS CONFERENCES BLOCK I INFORMATION SHEETS INFORMATION TO BE SECURED FROM THE GENERAL MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES ON WHICH TO ORGANIZE A PROGRAM FOR FOREMENS CONFERENCES. NOTE « In rating for interest it is suggested that the terms GOOD, FAIR and POOR be used. Misc. 305 Sec, Vea 19 BLOCK I. Sheet No. 1 FOREMANS CONFERENCE POSSIBLE POINTS THAT MAY BE INCLUDED IN THE POINTS To BE COVERED IN THE GRAPH OF GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ANY ONE PLANT. This checking list is to be used in determining the objectives to be included in the lay out for a series of conferences to meet the conditions as they exist in a given plant. Information to be Secured either through personal Imowledge or fromthe proper persons, or from both sources. + t Name of plant (or plats.) CHECKING LISTS- RECEIVING AND STORING BULK STOCK, Raw Stock. Has the foreman any responsibility for receiving and storing tulk or raw departmental stock? Yes or no If yes: oa Damage or loss due to insufficient protection from: fumes? light? exposure to weather? temperature? theft? fire? other causes? Nature of difficulty if any? Rating Methods of storage: suitability or containers? containers kept in good condition? loss due to leakage? to evaporation? Other causes? Nature of difficulty if any BLOCK I. Misc. 305 Sec. V-a. 20 FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. la Rating Other points in connection with receiving and storing taw departmental sto¢k? Nature of difficulty if any? Rating Mise. 305 Sec. Vea 21 BLOCK I Sheet No. 2 FOREMENS CONFERENCES Handling for Storage. Has the foreman any responsibility for handling raw departmental stock in getting it into departmental storage? Yes or no? If yes: Insepeting previous to acceptance? Quality of stock? Quan- tity of stock? Kind? Grade? Condition? Other points to be inspected? Nature of difficulty if any Si Rating Receiving from last custodian? One kind? different grades of one kind? several kinds? different grades of one kind? dif- ferent quantities of different kinds? different quantities of as x different grades? = : In bulk? How? ss = tees : + In containers? ok fowl a2 Other conditions? —~2= E Other conditions? “toe ei: - a : pe go ee ee psi oee tn gn ie et ee Pe eee Rating Misc. 305 See. Vea 22 BLOCK I Sheet No. 2a FOREMENS CONFERENCES TRANSPORTATION TO STORAGE Has the foreman any responsibility for transporting raw departmental stock to departmental storage? Yes or no. If yes: By hand work? wheelbarrow? man trucks? teams? motor trucks? mechanical conveyers? elevator? Other means? a Nature of difficulty, if any?_. Rating Mise. 305 Sec. V-a 23 BLOCK I Sheet No. 3 FOREMENS CONFERENCES PUTTING INTO STORAGE Has the foreman any responsibility for putting raw departmental stock into departmental storage? Yes or not? If yes: By the use of: Hand work? wheelbarrows? hand trucks? horses? hoisting cranes? motors? motor trucks: (small electric) mechanical conveyors? elevators? Other means? _, Natue of difficulty if any? Rating Conditions of Storage If the departmental stock isstored under any special condi- tions has the foreman any responsibility as to the storage conditions? Yes or no? If he has what are the conditions out of doors or under cover? In bins? barrels? boxes? packages? racks? drums? open cans? sealed cans? tanks? barrels? (dry powder) pres- sure tanks (gas) other containers? Nature of difficulty if any? Rating Mise. 305 Sec. Vea 24 ELOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. 4 STORAGE TO PROVIDE FOR ARRANGEMENT OR ACCESSIBILITY OR BOTH, Has the foreman any responsibility for storing raw departmental stock for accessibility or arrangement? Yes or no? . If so, under what special conditions? ._ Rating KEEPING UP STOCK Has the foreman any responsibility for keeping up departmental stock? Yes or no? One kind if yes: One kind? several kinds? several grades of one kind? several grades of several kinds? Other conditions? Nature of difficulty, if any? Rating — DEPARTMENTAL STOCK IN PROCESS GETTING FROM STORAGE. Has the foreman any responsibility for getting raw departmental stock from storage? Yes or no? If so: Getting right quantity of one kind? of one grade? several kinds? several grades of each kind? getting right quantity as store in: bulk? barrels? boxes? bins? tanks? pressure tanks? Other con- tainers? Nature of difficulty, if any ue Batlng cs Misc. 305 Sec. Vea 25 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES _ Sheet 5 TRANSPORTING TO FIRST OPERATING POINT Has the foreman any responsibility for transporting raw departmental stock from storage to the first operating point? Yes or no? If yes? Transporting to first operating point by: trucks? hand? electric trucks? piping? conveyors? Other means? 2 Nature of difficulty, if any? Rating Protecting while in transit from: loss? theft? fire? moisture? adulteration? other damages? Spaiow. Nature of difficulty, if any? Rating SECURING THE RIGHT QUALITY OR QUANTITY Has the foreman any responsibility for securing the right quantity and quality of stock at the first operating point? Yes or No? If so: As to: Size? shape? accuracy? mumber? other conditions? Nature of difficulty, if any? Rating Misc, 295 Sec. V-a 26 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. 6. HANDLING INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS. Has the foreman any responsibility for handling intermediate pro- ducts in his department? Yes or no? . Transporting in cans, barrels, boxes, packages, open cans? Other containers? Nature of difficulty, if any? ae Rating PROTECTION WHILE IN INTERMEDIATE STORAGE From loss? theft? moisture? fire? adulteration? fumes? Other dangers? Natuer of difficulty, if any? Rating Transporting between intermediate operating points by: hand? truck? electric truck? conveyor? Other means? Rating Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 27 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. 8. “ELASTIC EQUIPMENT? Has the foreman any responsibilities as to "elastic equipment "7? Yes or no? If yes assigning equipment mits to jobs? balancing equipment units? laying out? giving out small tools? special attachments? Other responsibilities? Nature of the difficulty, if any? Rating NEW EQUIPMENT Has the foreman any responsibilities in connection with the pur- chasing, installing, arranging, etc. of new equipment, (units, tools, attachments) Yes or no? If yes, what are the details? Nature of the difficulty, if any? Rating ..— Miee, 205 Sec, V-a 28 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. 9 OPERATION AND PROCESSES. Has the foreman any responsibilities in connection with the carrying on of the various operations or processes that are included in the work of his department? Yes or no? ._ If yes: Starting jobs? checking jobs while in operation, making special tests? stopping jobs? looking out for special working conditions? determining operations? determining processes? determining special operations and processes? securing the necessary or required final quantities of intermediate products? securing the necessary or required final product? getting the necessary or required quantity of final product? getting the necessary or required qualities of intermediate and final products? Inspecting intermediate products? Inspecting final products? controlling the amount of operating waste? operating yield? conver- sion? amount ot Guality of by-products? Nature of the difficulties, if any? Rating Misc. 305 Sec. Vea 29 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. 11 THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE WORKING FORCE. Has the foreman any responsibilities for keeping up the working force? Yes or no? . If yes: hiring? discharging? tramsferring? to other departments? penalizing? reprimanding? Other responsibilities? Nature of the difficulty, if any? eo: Rating COVERING JOBS IN THE DEPARTMENT. Has the foreman any responsibilities in connection with "covering" all jobs in his department? Yes or no? "Covering" all jobs? providing minimum skill on all jobs? trans- ferring to meet temporary conditions? Other respmsibilities? Nature of difficulty, if any? ‘ Rating Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 30 BLOCK I FORIMENS CONFERENCES Sheet 12 TEAM RELATIONS. (COOPERATION) Has the foreman any cooperative responsibilities? Yes or no? If yes, are they with: The General Management? If so, in what ways? Nature of the difficulty, if any? Rating His Inmediate Superiors? If so, in what ways? Nature of the difficulty, if any? Rating Misc. 305 Sec. Vea 31 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. lia TEAM RELATIONS. (COOPERATION) Other foremen? If so, in what way? Nature of the difficulty, if any? . Rating (—) With the working force? If so, in what way? Nature of the difficulty, if any? Rating Note. Cooperation can be either with the working force or.from the working force. Either case should be noted. Misc. 305 Sec. Vea 32 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet 14. "THE HUMAN FACTOR" THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE WORKING FORCE. Has the foreman any responsibilities in connection with the physical condition of the working force? Yes or no? If yes: Ac to: temporary illness? chronic illness? incipient disease? special physical disabilities? (In connection with assigning workers to jobs) physical injuries? (Safety) bad physical condition due to Personal habits? Other responsibilities in this connection? Nature of difficulty, if any? ss Rating THE MENTAL CONDITION OF THE WORKING FORCE, INTEREST, Has the foreman any responsibilities in connection with the inter- est of the working force in the work and in the success of the plant? Yes or no? If yes: as to surroundings? method of giving orders? use of direc- tions and suggestions? handling of transfers within the department? from the department to another department? general plant knowledge? handling of promotions? Handling of discharges? Other responsibili-. ties? . Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 33 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES Sheet No. 15 Nature of the difficulty, if any? —_ Rating . THE MENTAL CONDITION OF THE WORKING FORCE SATISFACTION. Has the foreman any responsibilities as to the satisfaction or dis- satisfaction of the working force? Yes or no? . If yes, as to: General working conditions? specific job conditions, tact in the use of the directions and suggestions instead of orders? handling of the giving of orders? condition of tools and equip- ment? compensation? (doubtful if should be included: never except on request of the management.) general relations of the foreman and the departmental working force. (Fairness, squareness, no favorites, grouch, going off at cock, acting before all facts are knom, etc.) Other responsibilities, if any? Nature of the difficulty, if any? Rating Misc. 505 Sec. V-a 34 BLOCK I FOREMENS CONFERENCES, Sheet 16 OTHER RESPONSIBILITIES NOT LISTED ON THE PRECEDING SHEETS, Has the foreman any responsibilities not covered in the preceding sheets? Yes or no? If yes, what are they? 1. __ Nature of the difficulties, if any? 1. 5. Ratings: 1. 26 3. Chart No. 1. Misc. 305 Sec. V-a 35 SOME POSSIBLE RESPONSIBILITIES AS TO INSTRUCTION Or ized Inst ti Organizing Plans for Instruction. Cooperating with outside training agencies ...... Cooperative part time school Part-time continuation school Fall time day trade school Evening trade extension courses Slack season courses Etc. Lectures Conferences Shop talks Vestibule schools - Apprentice training Training green men Training I.R. men and women Training V. R. Men Training special cases Mise. 305 Sec. V-a 36 ‘Chart No. 2. SOME POSSIBLE RESPONSIBILITIES AS TO INSTRUCTION Supervising Instruction What is to be taught ____ Qualifications of instructors Instructing conditions Great WOrk6rs wise. o6 dcinedee General efficiency of training as to APPTONtides Ss x Giving Incidental Instruction m% © \ fo te \ g et i Job Training. a: Nan = > a 5 f. Cooperating with other training y S e) fer agencies outside the plant. ERE A a \ t= | nS SITET | plant Policies \ : = Plant Knowledge. \ SESE | ne 3H aS ER cP > Industrial Re-education es ° : °% -| | INSURANCE < CS Ge 7 \ ; & SAFETY co sy q S XX FIRE PROTECTION 5, WY = 3 Plant Procedure, so far as it Ky a eS affects the men. ee Ww c = C wr gF : Misc. 305 Sec. V=b -pg. 2 ee UP METHODS: THE "BLOCK" LAY OUT: This method of making the bird's eye view lay out" indicated in the diagram below. _MANAGERTAL AND SUPERVISORY cae Transporting Equipment: Maintenance 100% VG oe GooD dd Za) FAIR _S_ tt 2 on ae / 4 The “Dead Lifer} 7) 1 aoe oo s/ Sa fi ae a 4\ & lA G P oy i 7 of ved ‘ e Pe, ey Le ft / ies Ae i a CF i ae AW be | : ee Py by GRA be VA eel Ie oie elf) PA el A a ele Le) eal. Cf\ PAA ee eA A, ae Zz 1 2 3 4 5 6 q 8 9 10 i The general designation, etc., are as in the preceding dia~- gram. This form of lay out is free from the objection raised to the "curve" and gives an equally good "bird's eye view" of the situation, and so is recommended as the best method for laying out of the plan discussed for all ordinary cases. As in the case of the other diagram it should, of course, be laid off ona much larger scale than is shown here. DETERMINING THE OBJECTIVES FOR THE SERIES OF CONFERENCES: GENERAL: From the bird's eye view, whatever method may have been used for the lay out, it will appear that certain situations in the plant call for the most immediate attack for one of several reasons among which are: 1. They have a greater or less interest value 2. They are of extreme importance to the welfare of the plant, though they may not stand very high, or, in some cases, they may even be below the reference line, or 3. They may be of extreme frequency. Since the greater the frequency, the importance, and the interest rating, the greater the desirability, in a rough sort of way, it may be said that the order of treatment might be indicated by the formula: D=aFxeiIxvVY Mise 305. Sec. V-b - pg 10 where D indicates the desirability of immediate treatment in conference, and is affected by frequency, F, by importance to the plant I and by the rating. value V, as ascertained from the informational lay out (chart). For example, in the case of the information as shown on the last diagram, the conference objectives, in the order of "emergency" might be: 3, 5, 8, 10, 2, 1, 4, 6, 7, 9 and so on according to the way that they evaluate on the “formila" as given above. In this way a complete series of objectives can be secured set up in the order in which if handled in conferences, they would attempt to improve conditions in the plant. This method, when carefully carried out gives the list of de- Sirable objectives with the order of attack. Before the actual.set of working objectives can be set up, however, it is necessary to consider the working conditions as discussed in the next section. Mise 305 Sec. V-b - pg- ll Section III, Form A, LAYING OUT, CLASSIFYING AND RATING RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THEIR POTENTIAL CONFERENCE VALUE. Plant Name Block General Responsibility Mi S I Specific or Detailed Conference Responsibility. value. Mise. 305 Sec. V-c - pg. l Section V-—c. Setting up a Tentative Program. C. DETERMINING THE MOST DESIRABLE CONFERENCE SUBJECTS UNDER THE LIMITING WORKING CONDITIONS. Misc, 305 Sec. V-c - pe. 2 PRELIMINARY:- When the work described in the preceding section has been properly carried out there have been set up a set of conference objectives that have been set up in the order of desirability from the Standpoint of the needs of the plant, starting with those where the most good can be done the quickest and ending with those whose consider- ation can be safely deferred to the last. If all conditions in work of this sort were ideal, the next step would be to lay out detailed plans for a series of conferences to cover the whole list of desirable ob- Jectives, in the order as laid out, and this is, of course, the theor et- ical procedure. In practice, however, it is generally found that the best possible working conditions that can be actually obtained will pre- vent carrying out the conference series according to the theoretical plan. For example, it is often impossible to get the men for the full time that experience has shown to be desirable, (F.B, Ij pi73) or to arrange for the desirable frequency of meetings, (F.B. a p 74) or in Some Other way to meet the conditions of maximum efficiency, as dis- cussed in the bulletin. (F.B.I, p 68 to 77). In such cases, and this iS a common Situation, especially on ihitiating work, the conference leader to be mst fight hard as he ¢an for the best conditions that he Can get, and, unless the conditions are so bad that he knows that he Cannot do any sort of a decent job, and therefore, for the sake of his reputation refuses to tackle the job at all, "make the best of a bad job" and plan to do the best work that can be done under the working conditions. Before going further in planning it is therefore necessary to determine the working conditions as indicated on the accompanying forms, this information being secured from the proper sources, If the work is to be carried on with unit plant groups under plant control and on plant time, the information must, of course, come from the plant Manage- ment. If mitiplant groups from all the Managements concerned. If in leisure time, the information must come from the foremen who are to attend the conferences. The information as to the best possible working conditions having been secured from the proper people, these conditions must be considered in connection with the setting up of an actual working pro- gram. This section therefore discusses the question of setting up the actual working program with consideration of: 1. The desirable theoretical program 2. The best possible working conditions that can be obtained. SOME OF THE MORE COMMON DIFFICULTIES IN CONNECTION WITH ACTUAL WORKING CONDITIONS:- Experience has shown that among the more common working difficulties that interfere with the putting over of a theoretically desirable conference program are: Misc. 305 Sec. V-c - pg-3 I. A limitation on the number of meetings a week 2. A limitation as to che length of the meetings 3 A limitation as to the total number of meetings 4. A determination by the Mauagacent that the vork is to be on Company time and attendance revuired S. Limitations as to the providing of a suitable meeting blacé. (FB. I, p 71) 6. Insistance on the make up of an unsuitable group as to size of group (Maximum effective number 15) experience (F.B. I, p 70) and other make up factors. 7.