ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY NEW YorK STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND HoME ECoNomIcs AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library SB 363.W3 Renovation of an old apple orchard. iT ; RENOVATION OF AN OLD APPLE ORCHARD. A ae EE BY f pate: pe RAYMOND §S, WASHBURN. 197 HEHEHE JUNE 1912. Cre, » SB 364 3 / 327898 OUTLINE. I. INTRODUCTION. II, CULTIVATION. III. PRUNING. a. REMOVING EXCESS OF TREES. b. SHAPING AND THINNING THE INDIVIDUAL TRIE, ¢. IMPROVING THE SANITARY CONDITION OF THE ORCHARD. IV. DRAINAGE. Vv. FERTILIZATION . &. RESULTS FROM USE OF FERTILIZERS. bh. KINDS OF FERTILIZERS. ©. INDICATIONS OF NEED OF FERTILIZER, VI. SPRAYING, &. INSECTS AND FUNGOUS DISEASES. b. OUTLINE FOR SPRAYING THE APPLE ORCHARD. VII. COST OF RENOVATION. VIIT. PROFITS FROM RENOVATION, IX, SUMMARY. RENOVATION OF AN OLD APPLE ORCHARD. Be BERLIN Introduction. Throughout New York State there are many neglected orchards ranginy in size from a few trees to several acres, These trees were planted in the early days mainly as a home source of supply and little thought end attention was given them as a commercial enterprise. They grew and produced an abundance of fruit and, since they were not a source of income, were naturally neglected. A. majority of them were set too thick and formed tall high- headed trees which were hard te prune and spray. Later when the multitude of insect and fungous diseases became prevelent and scientists knew little of their contrel, the orchard owner beceme discoureged and allowed his once productive trees to deteriorate still further. Now conditions have chenged and there is a large end growing demand for choice fruit. To meet this demand thousands of ecres of orchards have been planted but it will be some years before these young orchards will come inte bearing. The question is whether it will be profitable to re- new these old orchards and make them a source of income while the new trees are growing and developing. The ans- wer is that it will, es has been demonstrated in many ne- glected orchards cf this state. Cultivation. There ere many methods of apple orchard culture and individual growers, as well as scientific pomologists, have not yet decided on a universal stendard of whet the best orchard culture should be. Perhaps it would be well to briefly compare the different methods, (1) The Continuous Clean Culture Method. By this ne- thod the lend is plowed in the spring and cultivation con- tinued throughout the growing season until late autumn when cultivation ceases and the soil is allowed to lie undisturbed and uncovered until the next spring when the process is repeated. This method is generally if not el- weys found to be unsuccessful because of the severe wash- ing and loss of soil due to rains. (2) The Cover-Crop Method. This method consists in plowing and disking the ground as early in the spring as the soil will permit. Cultivetion is continued until the niddle of July, when some cever crop is sow and allowed to remein for the remainder of the season. (3) The Sod Culture Method. This method consists in allewing the grass to grow end form 4 sod over the en- tire surface of the orchard, except a circular area of ground under each individual tree which is dug up and kept mellow during the growing season. The grass is mowed and allowed to remain where it falls. -5- (4) The Sod Mulch Method. By this method the grase is allowed to grow and form a sod over the entire surface of the orchard. Instead of speding end cultivatirg cir- cular areas atout each tree, these spaces ere mulched with straw. The grass is also mowed et intervals and used to méintein the mulch about the trees. This method is well adapted to orchards on steep slopes where cultivation would result in severe loss through washing of the soil. These last three methods of orchard culture were prac-= ticed at the Ohic Experiment Station with the result that the trees made a greeter annuel growth in the cover=crop plot than in the sod-culture plot, but not eas great as in the sod=-mulch plot. On the sodemuich plot there were produced 172 apples weighing 55,5 lbs; on the cover-crep plot, 70 epples, weighing 21 lbs; end on the sod-culture plot, 29 apples weighirg 7 lbs. Thus showing a decided advantage in favor of the sod-mulch, In two experiments conducted by the Geneva Experiment Stetion, as to whether the apple does better under tillage or in soc, the results were somewhat different from thoce found at the Ohie Station. This experiment was begun in 1903 in the orchard of Mr, W. D. Auchter, near Rochester, New York, The orchard consisted of nine end one-helf acres of Baldwin trees, set 40 feet epart each way. On onewhelf of this orcherd, or 118 trees, the sod=mulch treatment was tried. On the remainder, or 121 trees, the tillage and annuel cover-crop method was practiced, The trees in the two experiments received the same care and treatment as to spraying, pruning and all orcherd operations except soil treatment. Results of the two methods employed. The average yield on the sod=plet for five years was 72.9 barrels per acre, while that of the tilled plot was 109.2 barrels, or a dif- ference of 36.3 bbls. in faver of the tilled plot. It is also interesting to note that the tilled trees yearly in- creased their bearing capacity; and that on the other. hand the sed-mulch trees gradually decreased in yield of fruit. During the entire experiment the fruit on the sod= mulch plot matured one to three weeks earlier than on the tilled plot. The keeping quality of the tilled apples was much sup- erier to that of the sod-mulched apples, those from the tilled plot keeping 4 weeks longer then from the sod=plot,. The fruit from the sodemulch plot was more highly colored, However, in eating quality, the tilled apples were superior to the sod-mulched product. The tissues of fruit from the tilled plot was turgid and crisp while in the epples from the sod-mulch plet there was a tendency to dryness and meatiness. Trees in sod showed abnormalities in foliage, branches end roets. The foliage on the tilled trees was a dark, rich green color while on sod it was a yellow color. The leaves on the tilled trees were nuch larger, came out ear- lier and remeined on the trees later than on sodded trees. The roots of sodded trees came to the surface of the ground; in tilled trees there were more roots and they grew deeper. The average cost per acre, not including harvesting, was $17.92 for the sod; end $24.47 for tillage giving a difference of $6.55 in favor of the sod. In summing up the resulta of this experiment, Professer Hedrick of the Geneva Station says thet Tillage is better than sod for the apple since there is a larger moisture supply in the tilled plot and there= fore e greater food supply. There is more humus in the tilled plot and it is warmer end better serated. Also there are more beneficial micro-organisms in tilled than in other soils. From these results it would seem that tillage and cover- crops were best for the average orchard and especially so in case of old, neglected trees, since with neglected trees it is important thet they should make a large and rapid growth of new wood. Pruning. In a majority ef neglected orchards the trees are too closely planted. The early growers failed to see the importance of plenty of room in which the trees could grow and develop, send as a result we of to-day see the effect of their failure te recognize this very important principle. When the greater pert of the orchards in New York State were planted, about 40 years ago, there was a universal tendency to plant too closely. On 43 per cent of the aree planted before 1880, the trees are 30 x 30 feet or less; 82 per cent sre 35 x 35 feet or less. Only 18 per cent are over 35 x 35 feet. The larger growing vari- eties like Baldwin, Rhode Island, and Northern Spy will eventuelly require 40 feet between trees. With the small- er growing varieties, like Transparent, Oldenburg, Wealthy and McIntosh, 30 feet may be sufficient. If then the trees in these old orchards are too closely planted, the first and perhaps the most important factor in renovation is to remove the excess of trees. The first step then is to determine if the trees ere properly spaced. If they are too closely planted, the ef- fect shows up in the healthfulness and productivenees of the tree. According to deta taken from Cornell bulletin 226, the greater the number of trees per ecre, the less the yield. The average yield for four yeers of orchards where the trees were not over 30 x 30 feet epart was 186 bushels; for those between 30 x 30 and 35 x 35 feet, 222 bushels; for those over 35 x 35 feet, 229 bushels. Some of the more striking indications of close planting may be seen in the long armed upright growth with scarcely any foliage on the lower branches. As the trees gradually grow to- gether at the top, the sunlight is shut off, the lower limbs begin to bear inferior, poorly colered fruit and finelly die. Now if it is true that only the upper branches bear good fruit, it can be readily seen that there ie a great loss in bearing surface on these closely planted trees, on- ly the top area bearing fruit, while in well-rounded, pro- perly pruned trees, planted at the correct distance, the bearing surface would be at least three times as great. If the treee are found to be teo closely planted, and some must be removed, it ics well to follow some re= gular plan, so es to retain the conformity of the orchard. When the trees are planted in squares, ss is generally the case, in old orchards, every alternate tree in the row may be removed. This is accomplished by removing every se- cond row diegonally. If the squares between the trees were originally 25 x 25 feet, they will, after removing every alternate tree in the row, then be 35.2 x 35.3 feet. If originally they were 30 x 30 feet, they will now be ~ —~ So fh & ao a a ar a a a re ay am ae an Oo ® /0 12. 13 ex xX X a xe KK @ KK KO Ke XA oxexk Ke xX © XK © XG Le npeeneart a = 2 a ex xK @xK x K Ke KO @ SG Xeex xX KX Oe XKXXARXRP