ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library SH 456.H16 Dry-fly fishing in theory and practice / IANA 3 1924 003 655 440 mann.vau ee Bian ot DRY-FLY FISHING. Ballantyne JOress BALLANTYNE, HANSON AND co. EDINBURGH AND LONDON DRY-FLY FISHING IN THEORY AND PRACTICE B FREDERIC uA LFORD, F.L5, (“DETACHED BADGER" OF “THE FIELD”) AUTHOR OF ‘FLOATING FLIES AND HOW TO DRESS THEM” MEMBER OF ‘‘ THE HOUGHTON CLUB,” ‘' FLY-FISHERS’ CLUB," ETC, LONDON SAMPSON LOW, MARSTON, SEARLE, & RIVINGTON LIMITED St, Dunstan's Wouse FETTER LANE, FLEET STREET, E.C. 1889 [All Rights Reserved] AULT SH 456 Wie 266233 TO GEORGE SELWYN MARRYAT. In the last chapter of “ Floating Flies and How to Dress Them,” entitled “ Hints to Dry-Fly Fishermen,” the production of this work ts foreshadowed. Lf these pages meet with the approval of our brother anglers; tf they contain anything that ts likely to be useful, anything that is new, any- thing that zs instructive, or anything that ts to make dry-fly fishing a more charming or more engrossing pursuit than it now ts, the novelty, the instruction, and the charm are due to the innumerable hints you have been good enough to convey to me at different times during the many days of many years which we have spent together on the banks of the Test. As a faint acknowledgment of ail these obligations, and as a mark of high esteem and deep affection, this humble effort to perpetuate your teachings is dedicated to you by Your grateful Pupil, FREDERIC M. HALFORD. 35 INVERNESS TERRACE, W., November 1888. ANGLING, Go, take thine angle, and with practised line, Light as the gossamer, the current sweep ; And if thou failest in the calm still deep, In the rough eddy may a prize be thine. Say thou’rt unlucky where the sunbeams shine ; Beneath the shadow where the waters creep, Perchance the monarch of the brook shall leap— For fate is ever better than design. Still persevere ; the giddiest breeze that blows For thee may blow, with fame and fortune rife ; Be prosperous—and what reck if it arose Out of some pebble with the stream at strife, Or that the light wind dallied with the boughs. Thou art successful ; such is human life. THos. DoUBLEDAY. 1790 circa. TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR CHAPTER II. FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES CHAPTER III. HOW TO CAST CHAPTER IV. WHERE TO CA8T CHAPTER V. WHEN TO CAST . CHAPTER VI. STUDIES OF FISH FEEDING . CHAPTER VII. CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING THE ANGLER’S SPORT . CHAPTER VIII. SELECTION OF FLY PAGE 36 46 vas 98 IIo 138 162 x TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER IX. EVENING FISHING CHAPTER X. HOOKING, PLAYING, AND LANDING » CHAPTER XI. AUTOPSY . CHAPTER XII. TROUT OR GRAYLING . CHAPTER XIII. THE MANAGEMENT OF A FISHERY INDEX PAGE 201 217 231 251 260 281 Pratze iI. ‘5 IL ‘3 ITI. i IV. . Downward Cut—Forward Position . si VI. » VIL » VIIL 3 IX. p> RL 5 Sar » XII » XIV. oY » XVI XVIL » XVIIL ” oo) OE, LIST OF PLATES. Landing a Trout . ‘ : ; Frontispiece Grip of the Rod Over-handed Cast—Backward Position ” » Coming forward . ‘3 » Forward Position Under-handed Cast—Backward Position i a Coming Forward “ 3 Forward Position Steeple-Cast—Recovering the Line +5 5 Backward Position 3 » Coming Forward Dry Switch—Commencement 5 3 Finish Where to Cast—Illustrative Plan Mayfly—Eggs, Larve and Nymphe— Coloured Larva and Nymphe Magnified Sub-imago Male and Female— Magnified Imago Female Magnified Sub-imago and Imago—Coloured ” ” to face page 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 go 172 180 188 xii LIST OF PLATES. Puate XX. Mayfly—Imago Male Magnified to face page 192 » XI. Autopsy—Longitudinal Section of Trout __,, Nymphe of Ephemeride gee oe _ Caddis and Shrimp—Coloured » XXIII. % Nymphez of Ephemeride Magnified . ., XXIV. a Caddis and Shrimp Magnified » XV. Management of a Fishery—Illustrative Plan . ” eA 232 238 242 246 276 DRY-FLY FISHING. CHAPTER I. THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. BEForE attempting to teach a novice how to fish with the floating fly, it may be desirable, as a preli- minary step, to give some detailed information about the tools with which he is expected to work. In this chapter it is my object to discuss calmly and without prejudice the pros and cons of each branch of the subject, in the hopes of inducing the rising generation of anglers to commence their study with the aid of the best devised and most suitable gear. Possibly I may in some instances even per- suade experienced anglers to abandon what they have used for years, and substitute improvements which will tend to render the pursuit of their sport at once easier and more fascinating. One paramount difficulty occurs, and this is to avoid making one’s self the means of puffing the wares of any one or more makers to the detriment of others who, al- though unknown to the author, may be as capable A 2 DRY-FLY FISHING. of producing first-rate work, and as honest in supply- ing it. If any names are mentioned here, it is only because it is barely possible to describe the improve- ments made in various portions of the angler’s gear without in some instances referring to the names of those who have made these particular improvements their specialities. Although the word “dry” is used as a qualifying adjective to the expression “ fly fisher- man” in the title of this chapter, it will, I hope, be found that most, if not all, of the various kinds of rods and tackle, as well as the reasons for and against using them, will apply with as much force to the votary of the sunk or wet-fly style as to the most infatuated disciple of the floating fly. The first and most important factor to be con- sidered is the choice of a rod; and on this question the whole angling fraternity is divided into two totally distinct schools, viz., those who advise the use of a double-handed and those who prefer a single-handed one for dry-fly fishing. The advocates of the double- handed rod allege that with it they can throw a longer line, and that at the same time the fly is laid as lightly on the water as with the single- handed. They also lay great stress on having more power over a fish while playing it, and being better able to keep a hooked trout from plunging headlong into the nearest bed of weeds. On the other hand the votaries of the single-handed rod deny that a longer line can be thrown with a double-handed. They also urge that any fancied advantage due to THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 3 greater power over the hooked fish is far more than outbalanced by the manifest disadvantage of having to carry and wield a heavier implement. Above all, they defend their preference on the ground of being able to cast with greater delicacy and accu- racy, of being far less liable to break the fine gut in the act of striking, and in addition of being able to cast with greater ease against a much stronger adverse wind than is possible with the best balanced double-handed rod. Personally I am, and have always been, entirely in accord with those who swear by the small single- handed rod, and have freely expressed this opinion at different times. Some friends have criticised and some utterly condemned this opinion. Those who have condemned it have quoted as a strong autho- rity against me one of my best friends, now, alas! no more, the late Francis Francis. His name and his opinions have carried and ever must carry very great weight with all fly fishermen, whether they have known him personally or whether they have merely read his charming and ever fresh writings. He frequently discussed this question with Mr. Marryat and myself after a hard day’s fishing together. On this one subject we never could agree; but at the same time Mr. Marryat and I, albeit strong advocates of our own idea, admitted freely that his contention might be right as to the two points of casting further through being able to hold up a much longer line, and not being so liable 4 DRY-FLY FISHING. to catch the long grass behind the angler; and, in consequence of the greater power of the double- handed rod, having more command over a hooked fish. The late Mr. Francis, however, in that spirit of tolerance and justice which ever characterised him and endeared him to all who came in contact with him, conceded the point that for delicate or accurate casting with the wind, and in a far greater degree against the wind, the double-handed rod never had a chance with the single, and he himself in the last published edition of “A Book on Ang- ling” (the sixth), inserted the following footnote on page 160: “TI have seen 26 yards cast with a single- handed rod, and I also cast that length at the same time with the same line and rod. It was on the Old Barge river at Winchester that that was done, my friend Mr. Marryat being the other ope- rator, and it was with his rod and line. I have heard of even longer casts than this.” This admission as to distance cast, coupled with the fact that he himself frequently carried a spare single-handed ten-foot rod for casting a comparatively short line to fish rising under his own bank, I think very much diminishes the strength of his own arguments. As I said before, however, we never could agree on this subject, and the conclusion of our argument invariably was the same, “Quot homines tot sententiae;” and on this angling subject alone we had to agree to differ. Having determined to select a single-handed rod, THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 5 the points for consideration are, firstly, the material from which the rod should be made; secondly, its length; and thirdly, the style of action to be pre- ferred. With regard to materials, it may be deemed too positive an assertion to say so, but I think that there are, practically speaking, only two open to the would-be purchaser, namely, split cane, and green- heart. The greenheart is far less expensive, and not much heavier than the glued-up split cane. It certainly casts very well, and another very satis- factory feature about it is that it stands well after continual whipping. - Occasionally it has a knack of breaking off short in a somewhat surprising way. The fracture usually takes place in the lower or stiffer portion of the rod. As an example, in a three-joint rod it may be predicted that if this accident happens it will be either just below or just above the ferrule at the upper end of the butt. Sometimes a flaw will be found in the timber to account for it, and, with much of the cheap rubbish sold to the unwary, another probable cause of fracture at this part of the rod is the weakness produced by ignorance, or possibly neglect, when boring the butt to receive the tongue of the lower ferrule of the middle joint, or what the rod-maker calls the joint. This boring should never be carried as low as the end of the female ferrule on the butt, otherwise a weak place is invariably left. A very small practical experiment in measuring will enable a purchaser to make sure of this point when selecting his rod. % 6 DRY-FLY FISHING. Very often, however, a greenheart rod broken in this way reflects no discredit whatever on the manu- facturer. There is no flaw, the boring is not carried below the ferrule, and there is apparently no cause to account for the accident. In such a case it may be asserted that the angler himself is to blame. He has smashed his rod by neglect of a primary desideratum for one who wishes to become a fisher- man, namely, patience. He has returned his fly from the water and sent it swinging out behind him, but instead of waiting until his rod is released from the strain of this backward motion, has pre maturely forced it forward again in the mistaken notion that this action will enable him to cast further. No timber can stand this double strain, and hence the smash. For all who only fish occasionally, and do not care to go to the expense of the glued cane rod, greenheart is pre-eminently the timber to select. It is not safe to buy even this at too low a price, as the timber should be thoroughly seasoned ; the lengths intended to form each joint rent, not sawn; and the ferrules made of hard metal, properly fitted—all and each of which matters of detail add to the cost slightly, but far more to the efficiency of the rod. For the fisherman for whom the comparatively small difference in price is not important, glued cane can be most strongly recommended. It is far superior in every way, and is well worth the difference in cost. It casts better and casts further, THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 7 and does the work with less labour both to the angler and to the rod. In fact there is precisely the same difference between a split cane and a green- heart rod as between a thoroughbred and an under- bred horse. One answers when called upon for an extra effort, the other shuts up. There seems to be no limit to the responsive power of a first-class glued-up cane rod in efficient hands, so long as the line can be kept up off the ground behind the fisher- man. In addition to this, the built cane rod will slide four or five yards of slack line through the rings when making a long cast, if a fairly heavy line is used; to attempt this with a greenheart rod of similar action would result in a broken rod. When properly constructed the action of the built cane rod is true; it bends equably from point to butt. When returning, especially a very long line, it seems to recover sooner from the forward strain of lifting the line, and instead of quivering when the length of line is behind the angler, seems to stiffen itself at once, and hence to be sooner prepared to with- stand the strain of the cast. Mathematically and mechanically speaking, the hexagonal section is the very strongest possible; and further than that, in the method of manufacture all the outside bark, which is the hardest, the most waterproof, and the most elastic portion of the material, is used, while the interior of the cane, which is soft, brittle, friable sometimes, and worthless for purposes of rod-making, is to a great degree discarded. Not many English 8 DRY-FLY FISHING. anglers will probably be inclined to make their own rods; but if they do, I can only advise them to read, and read carefully, Mr. Henry P. Wells’ book, en- titled ‘Fly Rods and Fly Tackle,” published a short time since by Messrs. Sampson Low, Marston, Searle, & Rivington. The author of this admirable work has studied and carried out himself every part of the process of rod-making in his own country, the United States. He has probably seen much of the American method of manufacture, and evidently he is well able to appreciate the good and the bad points of it. In fact, nearly all his advice is as good as possible for the practical work of the rod-maker ; excepting, perhaps, the question of ferrules, with which I will deal later. It must, however, be re- membered that to buy here or in America a glued cane rod at a very low figure must of necessity cause disappointment to the angler when he attempts to use it. It is impossible to make a rod of this description excepting at a comparatively high price. Just consider successively the details of manu- facture. First there is the cane. It has to be selected, it has to be purchased, it has to be seasoned, and seasoning is an operation which takes very considerable time; and on the question of selection the judgment of a thoroughly experienced workman and judge of this class of timber is required—an experience which can only be got at some cost. Having selected your cane, and having seasoned it, the pieces fit for making the sections of THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 9 the rod have to be rent out of it (rent, not sawn). Very many of the cheap and inferior rods sold here are made of sawn sections; and it must be remem- bered that whereas the whole of the cane can be sawn into the requisite pieces, comparatively only a few sections fit for use can be split out of each cane. These sections have then to be planed true on two sides to an angle of 60 degrees. Six of these sections have to be accurately fitted and glued together to make each joint. They are then securely bound with string and left until the glue is set absolutely hard, and it takes many months for the glue in the interior of the built sections to set. When it is set the action of each joint has to be tried, and the whole of the joints making the rod have then to be put together with temporary ferrules in order to judge what the action of the entire rod will be. Some of our friends may say that with a wooden rod this same experiment has to be tried; but it must be remembered that with the solid wood rod, if it is too stiff, it is only necessary for the rod- maker to mark the places where it is too stiff and pare these portions of the joint or joints down. But with the glued-up rod this is altogether im- possible, because if he pares down the exterior of the rod he will remove from it the bark, the only portion which is of any value for rod-making; hence if either of the joints be too stiff, it must be promptly condemned as far as that particular rod is concerned. 10 DRY-FLY FISHING. Of course if it is too limber he has a chance, and his chance is to shorten this joint slightly; and if the result of this shortening is to render the joints of unequal length, the sale value of the rod is, owing to a somewhat absurd prejudice on the part of English sportsmen, much impaired. If any of my amateur friends should try making glued-up rods, they would probably be astonished to find how great an effect on the action of the rod is produced by cutting a very short piece off any one of the joints, and hence he can judge how easily, in attempting to remedy the above-mentioned fault, the rod can be made so stiff as to be utterly useless. Having now tried the rod, and got the action of it quite true from end to end, and seen that the butt is strong and well set up; having also removed any superfluous glue from the surface, a considerable amount of time and labour has to be expended in whipping the rods with waxed silk at frequent intervals. On. this point I do not agree with our American friends, who ‘space their whippings much too far apart. Lately I have had all glued- up rods armed with whippings at intervals of about half an inch at the point to three-quarters of an inch at the butt; and this is to my mind a great improve- ment, as tending not only to increase the steely quality of the rod, but to save it from a probable smash when it is imperative to kill or cure by putting an undue strain on a hooked fish. Besides, it is an assistance to the rod on the occasions when an extra THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. II long cast has to be made. It is an admirable plan to whip greenheart rods in the same way, as it in- creases the stiffness but little and the spring very considerably. We now come to the question of varnish. Of course the mere detail of laying on the varnish is simple, and whether in England or in America work- men who can accomplish it are easily found. The English makers, however, are not as a rule so suc- cesssful in the varnish they use as the Americans. Some of the very best glued cane rods are made in this country, and in all other respects they are to my mind unmistakably better than the very best of the Americans. After a season or so the varnish usually cracks on the surface from the mere action of the rod, damp gradually works under the varnish, and it then peels off in flakes, exposing the exterior portion of the cane (which perhaps is not very important, as it is almost watertight), but also exposing the glue in the joint, which in time must suffer from the action of continual moisture. In Mr. Wells’ book full instructions are given on every other detail of the manufacture of glued-up rods, but strange to relate he is to a small degree reticent as to the particular form of varnish used. He calls it coach body varnish, and further on says, “T use ‘Valentine’s Quick Levelling Varnish.’” I am told that different carriage builders use different varnishes for this purpose. I suspect that he means copal, and this very likely is one of the best varnishes 12 DRY-FLY FISHING. to use for the purpose. If English rod-makers adopt it generally their customers must, however, give them a little more time to carry out repairs: if they expect them to revarnish, as it takes several days to dry, and practically weeks ta become adequately hard. Some anglers prefer spliced to jointed rods, urging as their reason for this preference that the action of a spliced rod is more uniform throughout than that of an equally well-made rod in which the joints are connected by the usual metal ferrules. Before the use of thin hard metal for ferrules, when they were made of heavy soft brass tubing, there might have been some good grounds for this, but with the more modern form of metal ferrules the action with a properly balanced and thoroughly well-finished rod is uniform throughout. Besides the trouble of splicing each time the rod is taken down, to my mind a great objection to the principle is that the splice is never thoroughly firm and sound unless the two taper ends of the joint are cemented or glued together, when the rod is practically in one piece. There is always more or less tendency in the splice to work looser and looser, and a very small degree of give in it utterly ruins the action of the rod. Mr. Wells has in his book, entitled “The American Salmon Fisherman,” exhaustively argued out the mechanical and practical disadvantages of the splice, and to those who dis- agree with me I would commend the study of pages THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 13 33 to 37 in his valuable work. Having deter- mined to use ferrules, I must confess myself unable on this one particular point to agree with Mr. Wells, who is a strong advocate for the simple parallel fitting as against the ordinary tongued ones used in this country. On this point I speak with great diffidence, believing that he may possibly be right, and that the unpleasant experience I have had when using rods fitted with the simple ferrule has been due to imperfections in the manufacture— to imperfections of fitting accurately the male to the female ferrule. But mechanically his argument may be right. If both ferrules are perfectly cir- cular in section and fit accurately the entire length, there may be no tendency in one joint to become separated from the other in the act of casting, although such rods have not in my experience been seen in this country. Candidly, however, I doubt the correctness of his theory mechanically. It seems that any action pro- ducing a tendency in the line to fly forward must have a precisely similar effect on the fittings of the joints by the friction of the line in the rings. This, though slight at each cast, is evidently cumulative, and must in time slacken, and if not remedied, sooner or later propel the top joint from the ferrule. Until some marked improvement is made in this point, I must recommend our English anglers to select the tongued ferrule, and invariably to tie the joints together with the ordinary hitcher arrangement. 14 DRY-FLY FISHING. Neglect of this precaution is very likely to gradually work the top joint out of the fitting, until at last the entire strain is thrown on the tongue, which, being then loose in the socket, gets broken off. If, however, they are willing to go to some little extra expense to save themselves this trouble of tying the joints together, they can do so by using a screw fitting made by Messrs. Hardy Brothers. There are other screw fittings made and illustrated in the Badminton series, but I have not found either of them satisfactory in use. If the male ferrules are smeared with old curd soap before putting the rod together, the joints will very seldom get jammed. If they should, however, get so firmly fixed that they cannot be easily taken apart, a few drops of paraffin placed on the top of the female ferrule will in a few minutes find its way into the fitting and remedy the fault. The rod rings may be either upright, for those who prefer them (and of all upright forms that known as the snake is the best), or they may be of the ordinary loose pattern. The line passes a little more freely through the former, and the advantage of the latter is that when packed in the case there is less likelihood of their becoming broken or injured. In either case they should be made of hard German silver. The point ring should be of the Bickerdyke pattern, or what I think quite as good, a steel ring revolving in an eye made of the same wire as the rings. The winch fittings THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 15 should be of the ordinary description, and nothing further would require to be said on this subject if tackle-makers had realised what other trades have been compelled to do, namely, the necessity of uniformity. Every little maker, however, now-a- days thinks he has achieved some distinction in making the scoop of his winch either extraordi- narily large or particularly small, so that the ordi- nary winch fitting as fixed on the rod in the one case will not admit of the reel being put in place, and in the other will not hold it steadily without the trouble of packing with paper or some such substance. Hence, probably, Herr Emil Weeger’s invention, adopted by Messrs. Hardy, of a conical fitting at the lower end to take the scoop, and a ring with very considerable range to secure the forward end of it. Some makers and some anglers are very wroth at the idea of having a spear at the end of the rod. Its disadvantage is that when playing the fish it is uncomfortable, and if made too pointed or sharp may even injure the fisherman or his waterproof. But if it is made quite blunt and round at the end there is the immense advantage of being able to stand your rod up in the ground, so that there is no likelihood of its being trampled on either by yourself, your fellow-fisherman, or cattle on the meadow. When spearing the rod, never jam it into the ground with a jerk, as this sets the ferrules tight, shakes the rod, and especially, if it happens 16 DRY-FLY FISHING. to strike a stone, is likely to break the winch. Take the butt of the rod with both hands just above the reel, and press the spear steadily into the ground. Now as to the length of the rod to be selected. At the time when Mr. Francis published the first edition of his book on Angling, dry-fly fishing was comparatively unknown ; and as the angler had only occasionally to make a cast, and never to keep his fly in the air while working backwards and _ for- wards to dry it, the exertion of wielding a com- paratively long rod was very slight. Hence we find that of the four single-handed rods spoken of by him the shortest was 11 ft. 7 in., and the longest 12 ft. 8in.; and he himself says that a single-handed rod ‘“‘ should not be less than to or more than 13 ft. in length.” JI do not think that the argument that men in those days were more muscular or more hardy than we are at present is worth any serious consideration; and hence I impute this advice to the fact of the principles of dry-fly fishing being then in their infancy. In the present day no trout- fisher can require a rod anything longer than 11 ft., and from this to 9 ft. 6 in. are the dimensions every practical rod-maker or angler would recommend. With an eleven-foot rod past masters in the art can cover a fish at from 26 to 30 yards, and with a short rod of 9 ft. 6 in., one who knows how to use it can put a fly in the teeth of anything short of a posi- tive hurricane. In connection with this question of THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 17 length, further remarks as to the reel line must later on be considered. If the angler will not use the modern heavy class of line, he must, to make a long throw, have a somewhat longer rod. The action of a rod must be absolutely true and even in every direction from point to handle. There must be no weak place in it, and at the same time no part which is unduly stiff. It should return quickly. The meaning of this is, that when trying the rods, by imitating the action of casting and forcing the point forwards, thus bending the rod, the point should recover and spring rapidly back to a straight line, and when there it should not vibrate, but quickly regain its point of rest, and remain rigid. This simply means that the elasticity of the whole rod is both uni- form and smart, the material of which it is built thoroughly good, and the tapering proportionately carried throughout its length. For dry-fly fishing it certainly should of the two be rather stiff than limber; but at the same time it is not recommended to use a thing like a barge pole, which cannot by any possibility cast lightly or with ease. ,. American rods, judging from what one sees here, are too whippy for our insular ideas, and seem generally to lack backbone. ‘They are also rather light in the point, the effect of which is to render it difficult if not impossible to recover a long line with them. The fashion of the present day is to use a rod that is slightly top heavy; and although this is B e DRY-FLY FISHING. more trying to the wrist, yet, considering all points, it is a fault the right way. There has been lately, in one section of the sport- ing press, some controversy as to who can claim to be the original inventor of the steel-centred rod. This may rouse the curiosity of readers; but if the point is considered as to the possibility of the inven- tion being of any practical use to the angling world, the only conclusion to be arrived at probably is that it is waste of ink and paper. The idea is to build the sections of the cane on a central core of steel. I believe it is also suggested to treat the wood rods in the same way. Now the word steel suggests itself to the casual reader as giving the idea of just what should be ina rod. Mr. Wells in his book goes so far as to say that the rod of the future will be the steel one. That may be, but he is certainly too well versed in mechanics to suggest the union of two materials having such totally different action as steel and timber. One must naturally bend and natu- rally recover itself far more quickly than the other. For a moment consider the effect of rigidly fasten- ing the two materials together. The one with the quicker action must of necessity tend to hurry the slower material, and the one with the slower action must equally of necessity tend to retard the action of the quicker material. What must be the effect ? A tendency to disintegrate their union, and some considerable inconvenience to the hand attempting to use it. So far, my remarks on steel-centred rods THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 19 have been based upon theory. As for practice, I cannot personally say much. I have handled experi- mentally some ten or twelve made by one of the best rod-makers in the United Kingdom. ‘The price. has in each case been considerably in excess of that of a glued cane rod, and my verdict has invariably been most unfavourable. They have not cast better; they have not cast more easily; they have not cast more accurately than the ordinary split cane by the same maker; they are certainly more tiring to the wrist, and when killing a fish I do not think that they have really given any accession of power. As to reels, there is not much to be said. The old-fashioned one has been greatly improved by the more modern pattern with the handle on the revolving plate. There must be a check. Some anglers lay great stress on having a silent one, “but, with no particular reason for it, I prefer the old-fashioned noisy one, which certainly gives forth to my ears agreeable music on the first rush of a three-pounder. There is, however, in con- nection with the check one point to which tackle- makers should pay a little more attention, and that is its strength, or in other words the resist- ance which it offers to the line being taken off it. As a rule it is far too strong, and hence even when striking from the reel (and no other style of striking can by any possibility be considered satis- factory), one does occasionally leave a fly in a fish which lighter action in the reel would have saved. 20 DRY-FLY FISHING. As the result of a rough-and-ready experiment, Mr. Marryat is of opinion that when casting about 15 yards of the modern heavy line, if the hand is kept off the reel line, at each cast or recovery of the rod just one single click should be heard as the line is drawn off. Of the size of the scoop I have already spoken under “Rods,” and only revert to the point to urge on all successful tackle-makers in the United Kingdom to do what the makers of microscopic ob- jectives decided some years back, namely, to agree among themselves as to one uniform length, thick- ness, and curve. Reels are as a rule in this country either of brass or of ebonite. The ebonite is far lighter, and as one has to carry the weight all day long, this to my mind is a very important factor. Some anglers prefer a brass reel, and they urge that it is less liable to be broken than one of so brittle a material as ebonite. And here they are to a certain extent right, although I find that a first-rate ebonite reel made of the improved material now in use, treated with ordi- nary care, will last many seasons. There is another argument used by both anglers and sometimes tackle- makers in favour of the brass reel,—an argument which to my mind is the most incomprehensible on the part of the angler, and the most ignorant on the part of the tackle-maker. It is that the heavy brass reel at the butt end of the rod tends to balance it. All that can be said is this, that if the rod-maker is so totally ignorant of his own trade as not to be able THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 21 to make a rod fairly balanced without loading it with a lump of metal at the butt end, which lump of metal must throughout the day, when casting, incon- venience the wrist of the angler, it is time he was taught better. On the other hand, many first-rate anglers differ with me on this point, and prefer the heavy metal reel, thinking that it gives an impres- sion of lightness in the point and steadiness in the hand when casting. We now come to the question of the line, and on this question I would ask the reader’s most careful consideration, having devoted a very considerable time to that branch of the subject. A reel-line should be made of pure silk. This sounds like an axiom, and it is one; but unfortunately, in the pre- sent age, owing to the mania for extreme cheapness, adulteration is so much the rule, that to find a pure silk line is to-day not altogether an easy matter. Then it should be plaited solid. There are three methods of plaiting lines: plait- ing them hollow; plaiting on a core; plaiting solid. In the first they are worked on a wire, which is withdrawn as the plaiting proceeds. If a piece is cut off the end of a line made on this principle, it can be detected with the naked eye, and the manufac- turer, knowing this, has attempted to substitute the second, a class of manufacture which produces a line not to any great extent stronger than the first, but one which will yet at a casual glance pass muster for a solid line—that is to say, he takes a core of silk occa- 22 DRY-FLY FISHING. sionally, but far more often of jute, and on this core he plaits a very thin tube of pure silk. This class of line is most unreliable and in every way to be avoided; and if only anglers would insist upon having solid pure silk lines, one of their troubles, especially when far from home, would be avoided. Having, then, your silk line, it must be dressed or waterproofed ; and here again the manufacturer, in his desire to produce a cheap article, and to pro- duce it quickly, has gone out of his way to use a most unsatisfactory class of preparation. He coats it with some substance consisting chiefly of varnish, or shellac, or. gold size, any one of which is of necessity brittle, and hence utterly unfit for the purpose required. Then, again, he soaks the line for a short time in this preparation, and it takes up on the external surface a small quantity of this brittle substance; the effect of which is that, as soon as the dressing cracks, the water gets in and the line very soon becomes utterly rotten. Such being the case, some three years ago I consulted one of the most practical tackle-makers with whom I have ever been acquainted, one who understood his busi- ness thoroughly and was willing to discuss, experi- ment, and improve any point brought to his notice. This was the late Mr. Deller, of Messrs. Eaton & Deller. He quite agreed with me as to the un- satisfactory nature of the line sold, and the first hint he gave me was a most valuable one. He told me that some years ago the lines were dressed THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 23 under the air-pump, and the moment he used that word it was a revelation to me. He further told me that a certain number of lines had ever since been dressed in this way, and that he was prepared to try any necessary experiments on the subject. After trying various substances for dressing, we arrived at the conclusion that nothing but pure boiled oil could be used; that by soaking the line in the boiled oil under the air-pump, it could be dressed perfectly throughout. The effect of soaking the lines in the boiled oil under the exhausted receiver of the air-pump is to draw all the air out, and thus force the oil into every interstice of the line. When our experiments had reached a certain pitch, he made and sold a considerable number of lines dressed in this way. Unfortunately, to my great regret, he died before the conclusion of our experi- ments. He was pre-eminently one who believed in the necessity of putting thoroughly good material and thoroughly good work into everything he turned out. After his death I consulted a very good friend, Mr. Hawksley, an angler of some experience, who, being thoroughly versed in practical mechanics, was able within a very short time to effect considerable improvements in the details of line-dressing; and the lines that he has dressed are to my mind so successful, so thoroughly smooth throughout, so per- fectly waterproof, and at the same time so supple, that I cannot help feeling that to the angler himself or to the tackle-maker I shall be doing a consider- 24 DRY-FLY FISHING, able service in publishing in his own words the exact process he uses. He says :— “Immerse the line in a flat vessel containing pure boiled oil; place the vessel under the receiver of an alr-pump; exhaust until all air-bubbles are drawn to the surface; do not remove the line until all the bubbles have broken and vanished. Take the line out of the oil; draw it through your fingers or a piece of flannel or felt lightly, so as to remove all superfluous oil. Then wind the line on a frame, as sketched on fig. 1. The I 2 3 SS SSS SSBF Fig. 1. frame, which should be about 18 inches long, is made of two side-pieces of wood, with two pieces of iron wire across the ends. There are saw-gates cut obliquely on one of the wooden sides of the frame. One end of the line when covered with the first coat of oil is fastened in the saw-gate marked No. 1, and the line wound on. The frame and line is then placed in an oven, heated to the temperature of 150° Fahrenheit, and baked for about ten hours. The line is taken out of the oven, and when cold, all irregu- larities rubbed off carefully with very fine glass-paper, THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 25 taking care not to abrade any of the silky fibres. After all the irregularities are rubbed off and the line made as equal in size as possible, it is again put into the oil, under the air-pump, and the air again exhausted. The line, when all the air-bubbles have broken, is taken out, and again wound on the frame, being fastened at the saw-gate No. 2, and so on; so that the line should have a different point of contact with the iron wire after each coat. The line on the frame is again heated for about ten hours in the oven, repeat- ing the operation as described ten times, rubbing down after each coat is baked and cold. "When the fifth coat is reached, use finely-powdered pumice, dry, on a piece of felt or flannel, instead of the glass- paper used previously. The pumice powder will leave a smooth dull surface. The last two coats will not require to be rubbed down, and will give the line a finished, glazed appearance.” A line dressed thus only requires to be thoroughly rubbed over with red-deer fat, and the red-deer fat to be occasionally renewed as the line is used, to be, to my mind, as near perfect as possible. Now as to substance of line. It must be fairly heavy in the middle part; for a fairly stiff rod, as heavy as shown on fig. 2. It must then taper to as SS SS SSS A A Lk SA Fia. 2. fine a point as the angler dare use. The length of the taper is a very important point, and if I had to fix upon an absolute one, I should say that from thickest 26 DRY-FLY FISHING. to finest it should be five yards long. However, Eaton & Deller invariably make the line with a six-yard taper, to allow a small amount to be cut off as it becomes weak from use. As a matter of economy, it is well to have a taper worked on either end of the line. When the tapered point has been too much reduced in length, the whole of the original taper should be cut off, and a new tapered point can be spliced to the central parallel portion of the line with waxed silk. It is impossible to cast against the wind with a light line, and it is even easier to cast down-wind with the heavy one than with the light. One of the reasons, perhaps, why glued cane rods cast into the wind better than wooden ones is that, other things being equal, they carry a heavier line. Gut collars must be made of the very best gut procurable, and I am afraid it is not always easy to get it. Even a high price will not always com- mand it, as some of the veriest rubbish ever pro- duced has been offered to me at almost prohibitive figures. The knot to be used in attaching the collar to the reel-line is shown on fig. 3. The length of the cast should vary from, say, three and THE DRY-FLY FISHERMAN’S GEAR. 27 a half to as little as one and a half yards, the varia- tion in length being necessary for variations in the direction and strength of the wind. A convenient plan, and one I adopt myself, is to knot up, say, two yards of undrawn gut tapered from stout to as fine as you can get, and also to keep a few fine-drawn points made of three fairly long strands. ZEAL IO CEERI: Fie. 13. degree damp, whether from perspiration or rain, and, if such a luxury is available, a warm bath before changing will tend much to the comfort and enjoy- ment of the evening meal. ( 36 ) CHAPTER II. FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES. THE simplest definition of the term “‘floating fly” is— an artificial fly fished on the surface; and that of the term “sunk fly ’—one fished below the surface of the water. ‘To carry the definition a trifle further, a floating fly, whether it is cocked, or, in other words, floating with the wings up, or flat, that is, lying on its side, is an imitation of a winged insect, either emerg- ing or emerged from the nymph state, on the sur- face of the stream, while the sunk fly is an imitation of the larva or nymph moving in the water, or of a winged insect when water-logged or drowned. In principle the two methods of fishing are totally and entirely distinct. With the dry or floating fly the angler has in the first instance to find a rising fish, to note accurately the position of, or what is techni- cally called spot, the rise, and to cast to this fish to the exclusion of any chance work in other parts of the stream. With the sunk or wet fly, on the other hand, he casts to a likely place, whether he has or has not seen a rise there (more frequently he has not), and, in fact, his judgment should tend to tell him where, from his knowledge of the habits of the FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES. 37 fish, they are most likely to be found in position or ready to feed. Thus wet-fly fishing is often termed “fishing the water,” in contradistinction to the ex- pression “fishing the rise,” which is applied to the method of the dry-fly fisherman. In treating of the advantages of dry-fly over wet- fly fishing, I am most desirous of avoiding any expression which should tend to depreciate in any way the skill exhibited by the experienced and intelligent followers of the wet fly. They require not only most undoubted judgment of the char- acter of water frequented at various times of the day and season by feeding fish, not only a very full knowledge of the different species and genera of in- sects forming the food of the fish, not only a full perception of the advantages of fishing up-stream under one set of conditions and of fishing down- stream under others; but, in addition to all this, great skill in placing their flies accurately in the desired position, and allowing them to drift down in a natural manner and without any drag or check over the precise spot they wish to try. There is far too much presumption of superior scientific knowledge and skill on the part of the modern school of dry-fly fishermen, and I should be the last to wish to write a line tending to encourage this erroneous assump- tion of superiority, or to depreciate in any way the patience and perseverance, coupled with an intuitive perception of the habits of the fish, requisite for a really first-rate performer with the wet fly. The late 38 DRY-FLY FISHING. Francis Francis said that ‘the judicious and_ perfect application of dry, wet, and mid-water fly-fishing stamps the finished fly-fisher with the hall-mark of efficiency.” This sentiment is to my mind pre- eminently characteristic of its author, and worthy of repetition by any of his admirers in later times. Under certain circumstances the dry fly has in every stream great advantages over the wet, and in rivers where it is not generally used has the further advantage, that, from the fish being unaccustomed to see anything but the natural fly floating down cocked over them, they are altogether unsuspicious of the artificial, and take it with such confidence as to ren- der their being hooked, if not their capture, almost a certainty. To define the circumstances specially suited to the dry fly is not difficult. When a fish is seen to be feeding on the surface, when the angler can ascertain the species of insect on which the fish is feeding, when he can imitate it, when he can present this imitation to the fish in its natural position and following precisely the course taken by the natural insect, and when he can carry out all these conditions at the first cast, so as to delude the fish before he has any suspicion of being fished for, the rising and hooking of the most wary trout or grayling is almost a foregone conclusion for the dry-fly fisherman. It must be remembered that the only possible means of establishing a satisfactory connection between the fish and the fisherman is the medium of sight. A fish’s sight is much more highly developed than any FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES. 39 other sense, it being questionable whether he has any hearing, or whether his power of smell with surface food is sufficient to guide him in discriminat- ing between the natural and artificial fly. Hence keeping out of sight is a most essential point to study; in fact, as before said, the fish should be hooked before he has any suspicion of being fished for. On the other hand, where no rising or bulging fish are to be seen, and whence it may be inferred that the fish are not taking surface food at all, the conditions -are favourable for the use of the sunk fly. Even under these conditions it will sometimes occur that the floating fly is more efficacious than the wet. Whatever advantages can be claimed for the sunk fly elsewhere, however, there are streams and con- ditions of weather in which it cannot be considered as having the smallest chance against the floating fly. As to conditions of weather, on the stillest days, with the hottest sun and in the clearest water, the fish are generally on the surface, when the wet- fly fisher would consider the conditions most unpro- pitious and unlikely. On such days to kill fish is most satisfactory and gratifying to the angler’s bump of self-esteem, and often the largest and most sus- picious fish feeding under such conditions seem quite guileless and fall victims to the art of the dry-fly fisherman, and nowhere so freely and so frequently as in rivers where the sunk fly only is habitually used. As to the streams in which the dry fly is 40 DRY-FLY FISHING. under all circumstances likely to be more successful than the wet, those which rise from springs filtering up through a substratum of chalk or limestone, and in which the water is usually of the very clearest even after heavy rain, where the current is only moderately rapid, and which are usually in the summer months fully covered with weeds, and hence well stocked with larve of Ephemeride, Phryganide, and other water-bred insects, are pre- eminently fitted for the floating fly. These are usually styled “chalk streams,” and it is said that there are days when even in the clearest of them the sunk fly is found more killing than the floating one. This may possibly be true, but in many years’ ex- perience such days have not fallen to my lot, and I should be inclined to consider them as happening ones, or, in other words, as the rare exceptions which go to prove the rule. Perhaps the best direct proof of this rule may be deduced from the fact that every Hampshire fisherman who has persistently studied the subject from season to season has gradually be- come more and more convinced of the necessity of imitating Nature as accurately as possible, and pre- senting the imitation in the most natural position, 1.€., floating and cocked. In Derbyshire, a few years back, every one used two, and many three, four, or even more flies; every one fished down-stream, and fished the water. Now hosts of anglers have invaded the district, the trout and grayling are as shy and wary as any in FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES. 41 the country, and what is the result? Day after day, and year after year, more of the successful anglers in the district fish up-stream with floating flies and over rising fish only, and it is only on an occasional blustering day that one of the old school succeeds in getting a moderate bag. The same tale can be told of all parts of the country, where the local anglers, taught from childhood to fish with sunk fly, laugh at the possibility of a bag being made with dry fly. As an example of this. Not many years ago, in Dorchester, one of the best dry-fly fisher- men of the day was seriously suspected, and even accused, of not fishing fair, because he succeeded in killing great numbers of the largest fish on days when the natives with wet fly could do no good at all. At length his proceedings were quietly but thoroughly watched by one of the local talent, with the result that he who went to discover a fraud found that he had been for years following a mis- taken policy, and went openly to his talented brother angler and told him all the circumstances, persuaded him to enrol him among his pupils, to teach him the art of dry-fly fishing, and at length himself became a votary of this style and a proficient in it, and ever after forswore the wet fly, and himself was able in turn to teach and convert others to the more modern and more successful school of angling. From north and south, from east and west, in later times fly-fisher- men came to Winchester, and when there, sav, learned, and conquered the use of the floating fly ; 42 DRY-FLY FISHING. and although they could very likely only succeed in killing their two or three trout daily, yet very soon preferred them to heavier bags taken elsewhere with the sunk fly. They carried the information all over the country, until at length the spread of dry-fly fish- ing has become something dreadful to contemplate, because in the rivers where it is practised the fish never get a rest, but day after day, week after week, and month after month, are continually and continu- ously tempted to their destruction, or worse still, perhaps, rendered more wary, more shy, and more suspicious. It is even questionable whether the bad features of this spread of dry-fly fishing end here, and whether the perpetual danger of taking surface- food does not in time keep the fish down, and even make abstention from floating insects an hereditary instinct. This, too, is probably enhanced by the fact of the free-rising fish being gradually but surely killed off, and the new generations being bred from those who habitually find their food on the bottom of the river, so that each generation is less likely to rise than the one immediately preceding it. Possibly, too, the introduction of artificially fed trout into the rivers still further increases their tendency to prefer the comparatively safe shrimps, caddis, snails, and larve to the perilous experiment of taking surface food. Some dry-fly fishermen are such purists that they will not under any circumstances whatever make a single cast except over rising fish, and prefer to FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES. 43 remain idle the entire day rather than attempt to persuade the wary inhabitants of the stream to rise at an artificial fly, unless they have previously seen a natural one taken in the same position. Although respecting their scruples, this is, in my humble opinion, riding the hobby to death, and I for one am a strong advocate for floating a cocked fly over a likely place, even if no movement of a feeding fish has been seen there. By a likely place, such a one as a bare gravel patch between weeds on a shallow is meant, or a point under the bank to which every natural insect must be carried by the stream or wind, on either of which there is almost invariably a fish either feeding or ready to feed at the first hatch of fly. There is no doubt, too, that an angler catching sight of a trout or grayling lying near the surface or in position for feeding can often tempt him with a good imitation of the fly on the water floated accurately over him at the first cast. Another great mistake often indulged in, even by anglers of great experience, is to commiserate with the votary of the dry fly in blustering or rainy weather; and one’s friends, when seeking to extenuate one’s want of sport, frequently express the opinion that it was “too rough or too wet for the dry fly.” Why too rough or too wet? The natural duns bred in the water are seldom if ever drowned in their native element, however rough the weather may be. At times the delicate Ephemeride are whirled over and over by sudden gusts, but they still float, and, 44 DRY-FLY FISHING. as a matter of fact, a rough day with a good curling ripple on the surface of the water is the day beyond all others when the floating fly, if quite dry, cocked, and accurately delivered, makes the greatest score, and utterly defeats the sunk fly. The true difficulty of a rough day is to spot the rise and place the fly accurately, not to float it; and on a rainy day, al- though it is undoubtedly hard work to dry the fly, yet, when once dried, it is undoubtedly far more deadly than the wet fly. We are often told that Mr. , the great Scotch fly-fisher, is quite sure he can kill any number of trout in a south-country stream, fishing in his own style, and is prepared to make a match against the best local man. Southron fly-fishers are not in the habit of fishing matches and weighing in catches at clubs, but occasionally one of these professors is invited to try his infallible system on one of their streams, and the invariable result is that, if he is obstinate, and so firmly wedded to his opinions that the stern logic of facts cannot move him, he returns with the dictum that there are very few fish in the river, or that the wind is wrong, or the water too low, or some other plausible excuse. If, on the other hand, he is a true lover of the art and not above learning, he quickly discovers that his method is not successful with the dainty over-fed fish of a chalk-stream, and before long he becomes a convert to the dry fly, and, I shrewdly suspect, uses it in hot bright weather to advantage in his native brooks. FLOATING FLIES AND SUNK FLIES. 45 A dry-fly fisher must expect to miss an abnormally large proportion of rises, owing to the very small flies he uses, and some of our friends are apt to quote this as an argument against the Hampshire school, forgetting that even if an unduly large pro- portion are missed, yet in places, and on days hot, bright, and calm, when the sunk fly is utterly hope- less, the chalk-stream fisher will rise fish after fish, and his excitement will be kept up by hopes of success, from morning to night. On one point all must agree, viz, that fishing up-stream with the finest of gut and floating the tiniest of flies, where every movement of the fish—his rise at any passing natural, and the turn and rise at the artificial—are plainly visible, is far more exciting, and requires in many respects more skill, than the fishing of the water as practised by the wet-fly fisherman. ( 46 ) CHAPTER III. HOW TO CAST, Castine should be defined as placing the fly, which is at the end of the collar, in a desired spot, in a desired manner, and at a desired moment. There are at least five distinct styles of casting, which should be understood by every dry-fly fisher. They are—firstly, the over-handed or ordinary cast ; secondly, the downward cut; thirdly, the under- handed or horizontal cast ; fourthly, the steeple cast; and fifthly, the dry switch. The beginner must commence by learning the first of these, or the ordinary over-handed cast. Perhaps the easiest way for him to acquire it is to place his elbow on a gate, or even a table, so as to commence at once by using his wrist and fore-arm only. At the commencement he must content himself with only a short length of line, and it is essential that he should thoroughly master the art of casting this short length before attempting anything longer. The rod should be grasped tightly in the right hand, with the thumb, or thumb and forefinger, extended up the butt. The more usual plan is to grip the rod with a “jepINeW'a ‘q6u SHL AD ara5 "WIT SYAHLOYUG NOLHOIS] ‘I aLvild HOW TO CAST. 47 the thumb up the butt ; but many very experienced, and notably one of the most accomplished dry-fly fishermen of the present day, who uses his thumb and forefinger for this purpose, claim some advantage for this grip, as enabling them to direct the fly with greater precision than with the more usual method, illustrated on Plate I. Holding the fly in the left hand, with a short length of line out, wave the rod back ina curve shaped some- what like a horse-shoe, at the same time feeling the weight of the line with the tip of the rod, and letting go the fly. Wait until the weight of the short line —say five yards—just commences to bend the top of the rod backwards before making the forward cast, noting, however, not to carry the hand much farther back than the perpendicular. In fact, this may be taken as a golden rule in all styles of casting. When the weight of the line behind is only just suf- ficient to bend the rod-top backwards, or, in other words, when the line is just felt behind, return it forwards with a slightly increased velocity of swing. Lower the point of the rod as the line comes forward, and see that it is extended at the level of about one yard over the water, and then check the forward motion. Carefully note the time of casting, like music, counting 1, 2, back—3 forward. It will be found that the time will vary but little for short or long casts; but the longer the cast, the farther the line will extend backwards, and the loop turning over it forwards will also be longer. 48 DRY-FLY FISHING. Plate II. shows the position and shape of the line when the hand has been carried back, and just before casting ; Plate III. illustrates the appearance of the line when the hand has been brought part of the way forwards in the act of casting ; and Plate 1V. the form of the line and position of the hand when the forward motion has been completed. To these plates of casting I would invite the careful attention of my readers, because they are not in any way fancied or fanciful illustrations of what any one wishing to prove his own particular theory may think he has seen, but are actual reproductions of instantaneous photographs taken for the purpose of illustrating this work ; and to the photographers, Messrs. Elliott & Fry, I must tender my hearty congratulations at the success of their work in this direction. I would also particularly call the reader’s atten- tion to the fact that these photographs, one and all, go to destroy the theories which have been written from time immemorial in all books on fly- fishing as to the form taken by the line behind the fisherman. Over and over again it has been written, You must wait until the line is extended ma straight line behind you before attempting to return. This position cannot in any style of cast- ing with a line of any appreciable length occur, and it is only because in those early days there were no scientific means of reproducing an accurate view that this theory was started. Its continuation is due to the fact that, unfortunately, by far the majo- (2F “Inewid “uomseg pavuyoog ~ LSYO CHANVHYAAO yIv] “SHBHLOYG NOLHOIS] Tl aLYTId ahs HOW TO CAST. 49 rity of authors simply copy, from what they deem to be good authorities, theories which have been before enunciated, and give them a further stamp of veracity without taking the trouble to ascertain for themselves that they are anything but fiction. In the dry switch the length of line from the reel to the fly was about to yards. In all the other casts about 12 to 15 yards were used, and in connection with these it should be noted that from the transparent nature of the gut and the increased velocity of the end of the line, an exposure of even the 150th part of a second failed to leave a definite trace of the three yards of gut collar on the negatives. From a desire for extreme accuracy I have forborne to supply this deficiency. It must also be remembered that the foreshortening of the curves conveys an im- pression of a shorter line than is actually being used. With the ordinary over-handed cast, in throwing a long line the upper arm will come into use in addition to the wrist and fore-arm, as the angler will have to feel the line of the backward cast through the arc of a larger circle. The force required to propel various lengths of line without over-casting or under-casting, and only just extending the line, varies directly with every yard of line used (the first of these terms meaning the use of too much, and the other too little; power to extend). This in- structive adaptation of the power to cast, of cause to effect, constitutes the whole secret of how to cast well. These fundamental rules apply with equal force D 5° DRY-FLY FISHING. not only to dry-fly fishing and to wet-fly fishing, but to all the various methods of casting enumerated in the foregoing pages. The two essential points to be attended to are, in fact, an exact appreciation of the force to be used, and correct timing, and these are the secrets of effective and elegant casting. It must always be remembered that hearing much sound pro- ceed from a rod making a cast is an indication of unnecessary force being used; and it may be laid down as an axiom that nine anglers out of ten use far more force than is required for the throw, and that excess of force only does harm. In all over-handed casting, note particularly that the hand should never be carried backwards far beyond the perpendicular. As a general rule, the great fault in casting made by beginners is in not giving sufficient time behind. Many men who can cast a great distance and throw a pretty fly, do it in so awkward a manner as to detract very much from the pleasure experienced in seeing their performance, and it is as easy to cultivate a good style from the commencement as it is difficylt to cure an ugly style by any amount of lessons after having once acquired it. A tyro can do no better than get a friend, who can cast, to start him in the right road, which he can do at first by standing close behind the pupil; and, grasping the hand holding the rod, with his fore-arm lying close over his pupil’s, guide the cast, counting at the same time “one, two, three,” until his pupil appears to have acquired a good idea of the timing and motions. “YITT ‘SHBHLOUG NOLHOI3] pep now psoniog buImMuo7? ~ LSYO GIANYHUEAO TN FLyia HOW TO CAST. St He should then stand clear of him on the left-hand side, criticising each cast, carefully impressing upon him the necessity of giving plenty of time between the casts, and explaining to him what fault in the motion of the rod caused the corresponding defect in the fall of the line. After a few days of this practice, which should, if possible, be made over water, or, if water is not available, over a lawn, the tyro can be left to his own devices for a few days, when he can practise until his wrist is tired, at which time, however, he should be cautioned always to stop and rest. After a few weeks’ interval, the teacher may look at him, praise and encourage where possible, point out any faults, whether of style or execution, and nip them in the bud. At the end of a fortnight an apt pupil should be sufficiently efficient to try his hand at an easy stream, where, if he has got it in him, the killing of a fish or two will make him a life votary of the charming pursuit. Drying the fly is merely a repetition of the cast made in the afore-stated method, only that the fly, instead of being allowed to touch the water, is re- covered in the air, and the action is repeated five or six times. Note, too, that the longer the line, the farther the fly has to travel, and hence the more rapidly it is dried. Another point to remark is, that, when thoroughly dry, the fly will not soak up water nearly so fast as a half-dried one; and the fly, there- fore, should not be allowed to get water-logged, 52 ‘DRY-FLY FISHING. as it takes a very long time and very considerable exertion under these circumstances to dry it perfectly, thirty or forty false casts with a very long line being insufficient to make it float three or four yards, especially on fast water. The over-handed cast, it may be noted, is chiefly useful for light or up-stream winds. The next two methods of casting, the downward cut and the under-handed cast, are specially useful for casting into or against the wind, and except in a gale, any fisherman who cares to take the trouble of mastering these two methods of casting can, after a little perseverance and careful attention to detail, render himself practically independent of the direc- tion of the wind. If he finds himself unable to get the line out in either of these ways when casting against the wind, he must try less force and give more time behind. If still unsuccessful, he must shorten his gut collar by removing from it some few strands of the coarse end, and if the weather should be very rough, and he is still unable to force his fly into the wind, he must still further shorten the gut at the fine end; and in very rough weather it is well to note that a slight set back of the line on the water is not so very important, so long as it does not curl over on itself. In the downward cut the fly is returned by the ordinary over-handed motion, and in the act of throwing, when the arm attains the angle of 45 degrees with the level of the water, it should be extended to full-length forwards, the - knuckles YT ‘SaaHioug NOLHOIS] jap In9W'O MOpsIg P4VMLOT ~ LSWVO GCAACNVHAHAO ‘AL aALV Id ‘HOW TO CAST. 53 turned downwards, and a drawing circular cut in towards the body must be made as the line is delivered, the elbow being slightly raised at the same moment, and the point of the rod brought down to the level of the water. This position is illustrated on Plate V. If this downward cut is made too soon, the whole of the line will be blown back in coils. If too late, a heavy splash’ on the water will be the result. If time and force are quite right—and again remember no great force is required—the line will extend itself in the teeth of the wind, the fly going out nearly straight, and the back motion of the cut pulling the slack line back, and the result of the backward motion will not really be more than the check used in the ordinary cast. The downward cut is a difficult cast to describe, and a difficult cast to attain, but it is an invaluable one when throwing against a strong wind, especially when the grass is high behind the angler, under which conditions it is at times quite impossible to use the next method, which I will now describe. The under-handed cast, as the second method of throwing against the wind is called, is only acquired after considerable practice and perseverance, but is, as a general rule, to be preferred to the over-handed cast, and hence should be used wherever practicable. Although at the first glance in the case of one accus- tomed to the ordinary over-handed cast it may ap- pear difficult to accomplish the action of returning and 54 DRY-FLY FISHING. throwing under-handed, yet, when once acquired, no - other method of casting into the wind is to be com- pared to it, especially as the motion of the rod is far less visible to the fish. The whole secret consists in keeping the rod in a nearly horizontal position, and moving it, whether returning or throwing, in a line parallel to the surface of the water. If, while drying the fly, the hand holding the rod is raised when returning, the action of the wind is very apt to force the line back too quickly, and the fly may be cracked off. If sufficient time is not given be- hind, or, in other words, if the cast is made too soon, in this, as in every other style of casting, the fly is also cracked off. If in the act of casting the hand is raised, the force of the adverse wind on the line prevents the fly from going out in the desired direc- tion, and it is curled back on the reel-line, in which position no highly-educated fish is likely to look at the fly. Ifin the act of casting the hand is unduly lowered, the effect is a decided splash on the water. If in returning the hand is lowered—an almost im- possible action—the fly is generally securely hooked to a blade of grass on the bank. Hence, to make this cast, the horizontal position of the rod moving parallel to the water is absolutely necessary. I have illustrated in Plate VI. the position of the line at the moment that the rod-point is carried to the farthest point back; in Plate WII. the moment when the rod-point has travelled half- way through the arc; and in Plate VIII. the forward YlIy 'SHYBHLONG NOLHOIST uompsog Psondog — LO CUYMNMOG Sa a abv hd [ep NOW 'D HOW TO CAST. 55 position or finish of the cast. Continual practice, and the presence of a friend to correct faults which are frequently invisible to the fisherman himself are the best, nay, the only means of learning the action. At every opportunity, and in every possible place, this cast should be patiently persevered in. Although naturally preferable, yet the river is not an absolute necessity, as the cast can be practised in a field or ona lawn. It must be borne in mind that the primary difficulty consists in overcoming the natural tendency to raise the hand holding the rod; and the next point is to get over the severe cramp in the hand, wrist, and fore-arm, which is caused either by bringing a new set of muscles into play, or by straining in a different direction to the accustomed one those muscles which have been hitherto used in the ordinary mode of casting. This method is especially useful when casting across wind to a fish feeding under the opposite bank, or under overhanging boughs, if they are not too low. It may also be advantageously employed in fishing a place where the trees are growing on the angler’s own bank; and in this case it is necessary to remember that the rod-point should be as far as possible kept over the water while drying the fly, and that the line should be returned under and delivered over the rod-point. Above all, note where the bushes or trees are situated, and avoid them. A step to one side or the other will, as a rule, save the fly from touching them; so, look back at the 56 DRY-FLY FISHING. line when drying the fly, and see where it touches in the first false cast or two, and correct before absolutely putting the fly on the water; and even if it should be caught behind, it will invariably be low down within your reach, so that you can recover the fly and save a smash. Accuracy of direction is, however, far more diffi- cult to attain in the under-handed cast than in any other style of throwing; and this is due to the fact that the rod-point, and consequently the fly, travels in the arc of a circle or ellipse across the point to which the fly is directed, and not in a straight line down on it, as in the case of the over-handed cast. Having once fairly mastered these difficulties, the angler will find that he has not only acquired the art of throwing a fairly long line in a manner which makes it unlikely for the waving of the rod to be visible to the fish, that he has not only at the same time practically rendered himself independent of the direction and of the force of the wind, so long as it is short of a gale, but, strange to relate, too, his fly will in the majority of instances land on the water cocked or floating with its wings up in their natural position—a most important point when dealing with very shy fish in very clear streams. The majority of angling books impress on the fly- fisher the desirability of following Cotton’s old maxim to fish “fine and far off.’ As to the first part there can be no doubt. To achieve success in the present day the lower end of the gut collar, for ‘YT “SHBHLOd g NOLHOI3] ‘jap now‘ ‘uomsoy papayog ~ ISWO CAadNVHYsCN TAS ALY Te . HOW TO CAST. 57 at least a yard from the fly, must be sufficiently fine. The thinnest of drawn gut in the longest lengths compatible with the strength required to handle the fish when hooked is an appreciable advantage in every stream, and an absolute necessity on those which are heavily fished. The finer the gut the greater, and the coarser the gut the smaller, the number of fish risen and hooked. On the other hand, the coarser the gut the greater, and the finer the gut the smaller, the relative proportion of fish killed when once hooked. In point of fact, the problem is to arrive at a thickness of gut which is sufficiently invisible to rise, and consequently hook, a fair proportion of feeding fish, and which, at the same time, is not so thin as to make it almost a certainty that too large a proportion of the hooked fish break the tackle either at the moment of striking, or when sufficient strain is put on to prevent their plunging headlong into the nearest bed of weeds. As originally intended, no better advice could be given than the latter part of Cotton’s adage, viz., to fish “far off ;” but the tendency of the present age is to give a far wider signification to these words than their experienced author ever meant them to convey. To fish “far off” in the sense that you should, under all circumstances, keep yourself as much as possible out of the range of vision of a rising trout, by crouching, kneeling, or even lying down, is an axiom for the dry-fly fisher; but to fish “far off” in the sense that you should, for prefer- 58 DRY-FLY FISHING. ence, fix yourself in a position where you have to keep on throwing an unnecessarily long line is an absurdity. The shorter the cast in reason, the greater is the probability of hooking the fish. The action of the strike is delayed by the action: of the water on a long line. Get as well within your distance of the fish as possible. By this is meant that particular length of line which the angler finds by experience he can manage to the greatest ad- vantage, 7.¢., not too long to cast with comfort, and not so short that drying the fly becomes a heavy toil; and this medium distance is the length of cast to select wherever practicable. To most people it is about ten to fifteen yards, and very frequently one can locate oneself at this distance from the fish. Instead of placing yourself at what you consider the most favourable point for casting, and then regulating your length of line to reach a fish rising under your own bank, it is a good plan to keep some thirty yards below, to let out the above length of line, and dry the fly thoroughly in the air. Keep- ing your fly working backwards and forwards in the air with the under-handed cast, so as not to scare your fish by showing him the reflection of the rod waving to and fro, work yourself in a crouching attitude gradually into such a position that your length of cast will cover the rise, and, above all, bear in mind the importance of the first throw being delicately and accurately made. Occasionally the position of a tree, bush, or other Yi] SMAHLOYG NOLHOI3] jepnow'a “pinning Gurucy —— LSvO CdHaNVHYRGNN WA abLyviId HOW TO CAST. 59 natural obstruction, or the shape of the river-bank, will necessitate your being much closer to your fish than you would desire, and make the cast a very short one, possibly only just the length of the gut. In such a position the dry-fly fisherman is placed at some disadvantage—first, because it is very difficult to make a clean short throw, owing to the invariable fault one makes of using far too much power. To correct this excess of force, it is a very good plan to put the left hand as well as the right to the rod (I am supposing the angler to be fishing single- handed), grasping the rod tightly in the right hand, and, just holding the spear between the left thumb and forefinger, to make the cast with both hands in this position. The effect of the left hand is merely to check the forward action, and thus prevent the exertion of undue force in the act of throwing. A second difficulty with the very short throw is to direct the fly accurately, especially when casting against the wind, and using the taper form of line recommended in a previous chapter. Even with a short length of gut, the absence of weight in the fine end of the line increases this difficulty, and nothing but continual practice will enable the tyro to overcome this. Another practical inconvenience under such circumstances is the great exertion re- quired to dry the fly, as many as twenty or even thirty false casts in the air being found requisite to free it thoroughly from moisture. Here again the use of both hands does, to a certain extent, 60 DRY-FLY FISHING, distribute the strain, and will be found of consider- able advantage. ‘There are, however, places in which one must either cast a very long line or abandon one’s chance of getting fish—places in which the river is perhaps twenty-four to twenty-six yards wide, the water deep and comparatively still under your own bank, and a strong stream under the opposite one. Of course, in such a place the greater run of water, and, consequently, the greater proportion of natural flies, will float down near the farther bank, and, with the wind across or nearly across from behind the angler, every rising fish will be found there. The artificial fly, too, in such a position will fish well, and without drag. The knack of making these extra long casts is one which can be acquired without any great diffi- culty, and is simply invaluable to those fishing on club or subscription waters, as enabling them to give a fly to rising fish which are passed by as impossible by the majority of their brother members. This throw, which is called the “ steeple-cast,” has been frequently referred to ; but many writers on the subject have, I venture to submit, failed to con- vey accurately the principle of it. Commencing with quite a short line, the right hand holding the rod is extended nearly straight from the shoulder, and carried up almost perpendicularly so as to lift the fly well up into the air, as if trying to clear some high obstacle immediately behind the angler, and hence the name of the “ steeple-cast.” While drying jap now '|a “Waly SHBHLON G NOLHOIS] ‘uomsog peomioy —~ LS¥O AdSCaNVHUACINA : ‘A HLVId HOW TO CAST, 61 the fly backwards and forwards, the length of line required is gradually drawn off the reel with the left hand, and allowed to pass through the rings. Plenty of time must be given behind—in fact, it is barely possible to give too much ; and the action of throwing should be a steady swing without the slightest jerk, and very little force should be exerted in making the cast so as to allow the rod and weight of line to do the work. After the first cast has been made, the line is gathered in with the left hand in loose coils, until short enough to return with ease; and while drying, the line is gradually liberated, a coil at each forward motion of the rod, and paid out from the left hand, the action in front being so timed as to let goa coil as the rod is in the position where the cast would have been made, and thus allow the fly to travel out in the air to the full extent of the line, but not suffi- ciently to let it touch the surface of the water. By the time all the coils are out the fly is thoroughly dried. If it is a very long cast, keep two or three coils in hand, and let them go when casting. Plate IX. illustrates the position when recovering the line, Plate X. shows the form of the line when the hand is at the maximum height, and Plate XI. as it is brought down and forwards. When throwing down-wind keep the point of the rod well up in the air; but when the direction of the wind is adverse, bring the rod-point, when making the cast, quite close to the water with a sort of modified downward cut. It is astonishing, again, how very little force is required 62 DRY-FLY FISHING. to throw into wind with the steeple-cast. The dis- tance to be accomplished after a little practice, by means of this style of throwing, is quite astonishing to the fisherman himself, and my friend Marryat, who is facile princeps in long single-handed casts, has on a calm day achieved the extraordinary feat of casting over thirty yards with an eleven-feet rod. The switch-cast is often used amongst salmon and trout fishermen for wet-fly fishing, but there are cases in which it may be of very great service to the dry-fly fisherman. Say, for example, that there is a wall or a closely grown hedge, extending to a considerable height, a few yards behind the bank on which he is standing. On the opposite side of the river, fifteen yards off, or possibly in the middle of it, a fish is rising; and it may be most advantageous to give such a fish a well-dried fly, because he seldom sees such a thing as an artificial presented to him pro- perly, and is consequently likely to be deluded by it. The ordinary switch, as used by the wet-fly fisher, is accomplished by drawing the line towards you on the water, and throwing the fly with a kind of roll outwards off the water—in fact, a sort of down- ward cut—the possibility of making the cast depend- ing upon the fly being in the water at the moment that the rod-point is brought down; hence it is evident that the ordinary switch-cast must be made with the fly wet. The dry-fly fisherman can make a cast something like this, if there is room up and down the stream, by turning his face in that direction WU] SABHLOYG NOLHOI3] a 0 reoIreNn Gd uy ey Funan — L.SY¥O AIdadLS epee bea aliens Hn witech HOW TO CAST. 63 and drying the fly in the air parallel to the course of the river. If it is impossible to dry the fly ina direction parallel to the course of the river, this may be accomplished, especially when standing on a high bank, by shortening the line considerably and drying in a vertical direction, keeping it in front of the rod- point. The angler then takes the dry fly between the finger and thumb, and turning his face towards the stream makes a false cast or two with the point of the rod, describing a figure of 8, but still retaining the fly between the thumb and finger. At the for- ward position of the rod, when the cast would in the ordinary course of events have been made, the hold of the fly is let go, and the line travels out to the desired point. Care must be taken not to strike the obstacle behind with the point of the rod, or to entangle the line with it; and for this purpose the action of the rod should be somewhat steepled. This cast is certainly a very difficult one, and whether you can accomplish it or not depends much on the nature and distance of the obstacle behind. The position of the hand and line at the commence- ment of the switch is illustrated on Plate XII, and the position of rod and line, just after letting go the fly, on Plate XIII. A slight wind behind, as in the ordinary switch, materially assists the angler, and it is impossible to switch a dry-fly in the teeth of a strong adverse wind. Wherever possible the dry-fly fisherman should cast up-stream. This may be taken as the first 64 DRY-FLY FISHING. fundamental principle, and often applies with equal force to the sunk as to the floating fly. The reasons are so many and so obvious, that it is only necessary to refer briefly to a few of them. When throwing up-stream the angler is below his fish, and the invariable position of the fish being with head up-stream, not only for the purpose of feeding, but for the mere mechanical process of breathing, as carried out by the action of the gills, the angler is in the most favourable position to keep himself out of sight, or what an old keeper I once knew used to call “very private.” Where the stream flows evenly, the artificial fly, when fished from below, sails down in its natural position without drag, following the exact direction of the current, and presents itself to the view of the trout or grayling in much the same way as the natural insect. When the fish has risen and taken the fly into his mouth, the slightest raising of the hand, or better still the fore-arm, drives the barb of the hook firmly home in his jaw, or, to be precise, in my experience more frequently into the side of his lower jaw, which is what I should expect from the position of the hook in a floating fly when cocked. When a large fish is hooked it is a great advantage to the angler to be below him, and to be able at once to commence working him down-stream, which is at one and the same time the best and most expeditious way to tire him, and serves to take him farther and farther from his home, a place where he has many more chances in VIEL SHAHLOUG NOLHOIST jep T0W uomsog paomysvg ~ LSVO ATdaad bs Xe le ed: HOW TO CAST. 65 his favour from his intimate daily knowledge of every’ weed, stone, post, or other impediment likely to assist him in cutting the connection. Where it is impossible to fish up-stream, the best direction to select is partly up and partly across. If this be impossible the cast must be made at right angles to the direction of the stream, and again, if this be impracticable, across and slightly down. When throwing across the stream attention must be paid to counteracting the tendency to drag in the manner pointed out in a subsequent chapter. Casting across and partially down is called the half-drift, and here again atten- tion is requisite to prevent dragging by throwing a slack line, lowering the hand, or even walking along the bank as the fly floats down on the surface. Sometimes an extra strong down-stream wind will be blowing with almost hurricane force, rendering it well-nigh impossible, or at best very difficult, to cast up against the wind, even with the under-handed cast or downward cut. Occasionally, too, there are places where, owing to natural obstructions such as trees, bushes, or a jutting promontory just in the range of the line behind the angler, there is no alter- native but to drift or throw directly down-stream to a fish rising under the fisherman’s own bank, or to pass him by altogether. Under such conditions, and such conditions only, is it advisable to drift to a feeding trout or grayling, although in gin-clear water such as the Hampshire chalk-streams a very small modicum of success must at the best be E 66 DRY-FLY FISHING. anticipated, and no dry-fly fisherman, even the most experienced, need be astonished at finding himself setting down fish after fish, and perhaps not even suc- ceeding in rising a single one during the whole day. In considering how to drift the floating fly to the fish, it must be remembered that in this as. in any other style of casting, the dry fly should, as nearly as possible, imitate the position and motion of the natural insect carried down by the action of the current; hence the cast should be made with the length of the line correctly judged, and the fly accurately placed, so that it shall float exactly over the fish’s nose and travel well down below him. In the act of casting, the hand should be well extended, so as to be able to draw it back. Just as the line is fully extended over the water and at a level of quite two yards above it, the hand holding the rod must be carried some distance back so as to check the cast and place the artificial —of course quite dry, cocked, and floating—well in front of the fish, with sufficient slack line on the water, so that by gradually lowering the hand and point of the rod the fly will float down until well past the fish, without the slightest stoppage or drag. It is well to remember, too, that a fish will at times back and take the fly as much as two yards below where he rose. This is specially the case with the May-fly. Having made the cast, and the fly having drifted down below the fish without rising him, it is evi- yivy Sa¥BHLO¥UG NOLHOI3] piomdoy Guru ~LSVO ATAAaLS IX za.LV Td HOW TO CAST. 67 dently necessary to return the line, and the difficulty of accomplishing this in such a way as not to scare him is at best very great. In some places the whole length of line can be lifted sideways clean over the bank, quite out of his range of vision. But where this is not possible, the line must be gathered in very slowly with the left hand (supposing the rod to be held with the right), until the fly is well above the fish, when it can be slowly taken off the water, keep- ing the rod-point well down so that the angle of con- tact of the line with the water will be very obtuse and not scare the fish. With the utmost caution, how- ever, it is very difficult to accomplish the return with- out rousing the suspicions of your wary quarry, and hence in this style of casting, even more than in any other, the greatest precision and delicacy are neces- sary in the first throw. In club waters, which are so generally over-fished, it is not as a rule worth while to make a second drift over a trout until he has risen again. If not taken at the first attempt, and provided he does not rise again within say five minutes, it is generally as well to leave the fish and pass on to another, keep- ing wide of him, carefully spotting his position, and possibly returning to give him a further trial later in the day. A grayling, however, will frequently allow a careful and light fisherman, using the very finest of tackle, to make a second or even third cast over him, and then perhaps rise falsely, when, after a rest of a few minutes—especially if in the meantime he 68 DRY-FLY FISHING. has taken a natural fly or two—another cast may be successful in securing him. The half-drift, partly across and partly down stream, if the fly is well checked as it is descending, and when on the water allowed to float down without drag, is, however, fre- quently efficacious, especially in rough windy weather, the angler above the fish being, of course, less visible under such conditions. Both trout and gray- ling will, in such a case, often rise at and fasten to a somewhat large fly if quite dry and cocked. I do not think a particular pattern is of very great import- ance; but for what it is worth, my own experience gives the preference in such a case to the Wickham, or better still, the landrail winged variety of it, on a No. 1 or No. 2 hook. The half-drift is an especially successful cast for grayling; in fact, many experienced fishermen prefer it to any other cast for them. One of the reasons why drifting is not generally successful is, that the horizontal cast is often impos- sible, as when throwing in this way it is necessary to cast directly down the line of the current, and as the fly descends, to check the cast in the same direc- tion. But with the under-handed or horizontal cast it is manifestly impossible to effect this, as the fly must of necessity travel round a curve something in the shape of a semicircle or semi-ellipse. The ordi- nary over-handed cast then becomes almost the only practicable one; and in addition to the very grave defect in this style of cast that the shadow of the PLATE XIL. DRY SWITCH _ Commencement. D.Meur,del LEIGHTON BROTHERS Sith HOW TO CAST. 69 upright rod and of the line are ever moving backwards and forwards. immediately over the fish and in his direct line of vision, whilst the angler is above him and also well within his sight, another and perhaps even more serious disadvantage is present, namely, that although a cocked fly is almost indispensable, it is, as shown before, only in a minority of cases possible to effect this when throwing over-hand. To sum up the position, it amounts to this: one throw, and one throw only, must be made; and although it may happen that the several remote con- tingencies of placing the fly accurately and lightly on the water, of letting it drift down over the fish without drag, and floating in the vertical position or cocked, and at the same time succeeding in making the fish rise, may come off, yet in sporting parlance it is any odds against landing the treble, or rather quadruple event. Even if all the above difficulties have been happily accomplished at the first attempt, and the fish rises and takes the fly as it reaches his nose, another serious difficulty occurs. The fish has just come open-mouthed at the fly; it is between his capacious jaws; to force the barb of the hook home it is necessary to strike promptly, and as the direction of the strike is coincident with the line of aperture of the fish’s mouth, it must be achieved at the very moment that his lips are closed on the fly; or, discovering the fraud prac- tised on him, he will to a certainty open his mouth 70 DRY-FLY FISHING. and eject the very best and most natural imitation. Even if the angler does succeed in striking at the right moment, it is not easy to do so with just suffi- cient force and no more. Too little force and the fish is scratched. The least trifle too much leaves the fly in his mouth, and with the line extended straight down-stream and the weight of the current on it, it is surprising how little apparent force, with the assistance of the leverage of the rod, is neces- sary to make a smash of the gossamer gut. Alto- gether, as before said, this is the most difficult and disappointing cast of any, and should never be adopted, except as a last resource where all others have been tried, and tried in vain. jap T00W G ylt] SAaHLOYG NOLHOIA] ys g ~~ HOLIMS AAT Ux BLWId CHAPTER IV. WHERE TO CAST. With the modern angler it may be taken as an axiom that his sport is not what is popularly called luck, but varies directly as his judgment; and as a corollary, it may be added that, provided he is a keen and accurate observer, his judgment will vary directly as his experience, tempered by his capacity of execution. The object of this chapter is to try and give, as far as possible, the experience of others to improve the judgment of the beginner, and to convey, where possible, hints to men of experience. No point can possibly be of more importance than a well-grounded knowledge of where to cast; and it must be borne in mind that this knowledge is not intuitive, but must be acquired by marking, learning, and continuously studying the relation of the fish and his food, and striving as far as is practi- cable to take advantage of it. The modern school are far too much addicted to continual change of fly, often changing merely for the sake of changing, and trying imitations of the same insect, only differing slightly in size, or in the shade of the body, wings, or legs; forgetting that the fault too often lies in 72 DRY-FLY FISHING. their own lack of discrimination, which causes them to select fish in unlikely or impossible places, or offer surface food to a fish feeding on larve or other forms of insect life in the middle depths or on the bottom of the river. At the same time, it must be admitted that colour, form, and size, or, in other words, a fairly accurate imitation of the natural fly on the water, is always and in every way more likely to tempt a trout feeding on duns than some monstrosity like nothing in nature, styled a fancy pattern, which can only appeal to his curiosity. Places which should be selected by the dry-fly fisherman may be divided into three classes—firstly, those which are affected by fish feeding freely, owing to a large proportion of the natural insects being carried to or past them by the action of the stream or wind ; secondly, those where, owing to difficulties inherent to the situation, the artificial fly is seldom presented to the rising fish in the same position and following the same rate and direction of progress as the living fly; thirdly, places where the inherent shyness of the fish is decreased by frequent sight of human beings, or by some other abnormal cause. Of the first of these three classes a trout rising close to a bank (and here perhaps it is as well to note that grayling, as a rule, are not found rising in such a position) is generally a large one, who chooses for his feeding-ground a spot where almost off the sedges themselves, from under a hollow bank, or from the boards of camp-shutting, he can pick up WHERE TO CAST. 73 a good meal with a minimum of effort or exertion. A typical fish to cast for is a trout feeding under the left-hand bank of the river (looking up-stream), thus giving the angler a right-handed throw, with the rod over the water. The stream should be slow and steady, the wind blowing very slightly ; in fact, only sufficient to make a slight ripple on the surface, and in direction towards that bank. There should be a fair amount of fly hatching, but not too much. The fish should be lying near the top of the water taking every natural fly coming over him. The sun should be in the fisherman’s face, and not too bright. The fisherman should, of course, be on the same bank as the fish, and should be able to get within a reasonable distance, so as to cast for him with a comparatively short line, say from ten to fifteen yards. On the plan appended to this chapter (Plate XIV.) such places are indicated by the letters a, a, a. One feeding under the opposite bank is usually able to see you before you are at an angle of 45° with him, or fairly within casting distance. In a wide stream, where the current is slow and moderately even, but the strongest part of it runs close to the opposite bank (Plate XIV. b), this may be considered a favour- able spot if the angler will keep low and fish the under- handed cast, as the natural fly drifts there, and the artificial fishes well and without drag. Even if the wind is dead down-stream, so long as it is very light, such a place is not to be despised when found. Un- fortunately, however, it is not often found in practice. 74 DRY-FLY FISHING. At every turn of the river there is generally a suc- cession of points, close to the bank, to which every floating object, animate or inanimate, is carried by the set of the current and wind, and the heaviest and easiest fish, as a rule, take up these enviable positions (Plate XIV. c). Subject to exception, to be hereafter treated of, these are, as a rule, places where one should cast. It must always be remem- bered that when feeding close to the bank a trout is generally less liable to be scared by a small mistake, and even less liable to notice it, as the eye nearest to the bank is invariably in deep shade, and probably at the same time is ever intent on watching for edible morsels passing between it and the margin of the stream. It is sometimes a very deadly plan to place the fly on the bank, and with a slight movement persuade it to drop on the water. This comes off best on short grass, as the fly does not usually get hung up in it. Sedges, however, are dangerous, If the hook should get caught up, take the line in your hand and draw gently, but do not on any account try to extricate it by striking or jerking with the rod- point. Every angler of experience has occasionally killed a trout blind of one eye rising close under the bank, and in such a case it may safely be predicted that the fish is rising with the blind eye towards the middle of the stream and the perfect one against the bank. On a well-kept shallow—that is, one on which a fair proportion of the weed is left uncut in bars, and WHERE TO CAST. 75 in which bright patches of clean gravel altertiate with banks of weeds—every fish feeding on fly will take up his station over these gravel patches (see Plate XIV. d), and some of the cleverest fisher- men occasionally float a dry fly on spec over the best- looking of such places if even they fail to see a sign of arise, knowing that if a fish is there he must be in position, and ready and likely to take advantage of any unexpected treat provided for him. In all water, whether deep or shallow, with plenty of weeds scien- tifically cut so as to leave clear runs between them, the feeding fish lie mostly on the tails of the weed- patches, where the water commences to slacken, and are partly covered by the weeds or bank-edge, and in such a position rise with confidence to every pass- ing insect; and when disturbed by an imprudent passer-by, or even pricked, merely glide into the depths of the weeds close to them, and soon come on the feed again (such places are shown on Plate XIV. e, ¢); while, on the other hand, in an open bare piece of water utterly denuded of shelter, when alarmed they bolt off for twenty or thirty yards, starting in their headlong rush any other fish in the vicinity. At the tail of a rough run, where the water commences to deepen and become smooth (Plate XIV. f), where the fly, after being whirled over and over and swept down at a great pace, recovers its equilibrium and sails calmly and slowly down on the deep glide, there is often a specially good fish 76 ‘DRY-FLY FISHING. waiting to be tempted if the first cast is delicately made and the artificial fly floats down cocked. In very hot weather the hatch of fly in the middle of the day is as a rule sparse, but if at such a time an occasional quiet ring or a mere bubble is espied in a shady nook or under an overhanging bank, a fish there should be selected in preference to any feeding in the full glare of the midday sun as likely to be large as well as sometimes unsuspecting. In large deep eddies the best fish often rise very quietly in curious positions, generally with their heads directed apparently down-stream, although this is, of course, only apparent, as in this case the flies are carried round the back-eddy in the opposite direction to the general run of the river. If the eddy be large enough and the position of the rise such as to enable the angler to make a wide circuit wp-stream in order to get below the fish, and, throw- ing up the eddy, place his fly so that it drifts accurately over the fish, while the reel-line remains in the back-eddy so as not to produce any drag, the spot is a favourable one to try. (Such places are shown on Plate XIV. g.) The foregoing are all positions to be selected as those in which fish are naturally prone to feed. With respect to the second category, or spots where it is difficult to place a fly, such as under the boughs of trees hanging close down to the water, or where it is only possible to fish with an under-handed cast, or even with a left-handed under-handed cast, WHERE TO CAST. 77 or close to the knotted roots of trees or willows, a feeding fish should never be entirely passed over. In such a position he does not see an artificial fly floating over him cocked, without drag, and delivered without splash half a dozen times in a season, and when he does the result is a rise, if not a kill. Dry your fly up and down the stream and cast across from the hand (dry switch) in situations where there is a high bank, or bushes behind, and the water is clear. The under-handed cast is also useful where there are trees behind with boughs not very low on the water. Look back when drying the fly and see that the line when returned behind you works clear of bushes or trees. If the fly should catch it is sure to be low down, where you can un- hook it by hand. Where you see a fish feeding in a difficult place under a bush you are not unlikely to catch the gleam of a portion of a gut collar hanging in the bush. Note the danger to avoid it, and col- lect the remains of some other fisherman’s collar; the fly at the end of it may often give youa useful hint as to the patterns used by the local talent—a hint they are not always willing to convey by word of mouth. Again, you are out on a boisterous day, and the first fish you see rising is in a foul corner, where the wind is in every way contrary. Nineteen out of twenty fishermen pass such a fish as impossible. But the twentieth, grateful for the chance, setting his teeth, grasping his rod, and shortening the gut by two or three links, by means of the under-handed 78 DRY-FLY FISHING. cast, or if that be impracticable, the downward cut, gives the hungry trout a chance of which he is not slow to avail himself. Some days, again, especially on a club or subscrip- tion water, you will notice that your brother fisher- men have started early so as to be before you, and have walked up the windward bank. You reflect that all the feeding fish that they, or possibly you, can reach are most likely killed or spoiled before you can get up tothem. You decide to walk up as quickly as possible to get in front of them, and then all day long you and they are engaged in a breathless sort of race, one trying to get above the other, with the result that all alike get little or no sport. This is a great mistake, and the next time it happens try exactly the opposite tactics. Give them a good start, walk leisurely up the lee bank, cast a short line, and throwing into the wind, try all the fish you can see rising under your own bank. Do not be afraid of the work of casting against the wind, because this, as shown in a previous chapter, is not altogether difficult when you know how it is to.be done; and I venture to prophesy that very possibly at the end of the day you may find yourself with a better bag, and generally more contented than any of them. Also note fish rising under the lee of the windward bank, especially if the current sets there, as the natu- ral flies remain in this glass edge out of the wind. Fishermen looking across will often walk over them and set them down. They soon come on the feed WHERE TO CAST. 79 again, and you can walk leisurely up this windward bank and pick up a bag behind them. There are usually two glass edges where the wind is across the stream, one under each bank; that on the windward side is the part protected from the force of the wind by the height of the bank, and that on the lee side is produced by the back-eddy of wind thrown off the lee bank counteracting the force of the breeze blow- ing directly towards that bank. The third class of places to select, namely, those in which the fish are rendered less shy by some ab- normal cause, are as a general rule neglected by the majority of anglers, as, for example, the extreme ends or limits of a water. If at the lower end, most fishermen are far too impatient to get on, opining that if the fish are not feeding well there, they may perchance be farther afield; and as to the upper boundary, that generally is never reached if the fishery be of any great extent. My advice is, never neglect these positions, and never leave rising fish to go in search of others in what you fancy are more likely places. As a rule, if the fish are taking well in one part of the water they are taking equally well in others, and vice versd. If you are starting at the lower end do not be in a hurry; wait there until the fish begin rising, and try the fish there. On the other hand, if you are cold and want exercise to restore the circulation, walk briskly to the extreme upper end of the water, and there again wait for the rise, and fish it. 80 DRY-FLY FISHING. In portions of a river along which a public footpath or roadway runs trout very soon become accustomed to the sight of human beings, and are as a consequence comparatively tolerant of their intrusive curiosity. They are then not so easily scared, and if scared when rising, are not long in returning to their habitual feeding-place to resume their interrupted meal. A fish rising immediately above a bridge or a hatch is never very shy, and, besides, is very seldom fished for; the sapient angler opines that it is hopeless, as the trout will bolt down through the bridge or through the hatch the moment he is hooked. If it be a bridge, he does usually run down under, but not through, and there he remains in the shadow of the bridge until by the continued strain of the rod you have drowned kim and can land him at your leisure. Even if, once in a way, he does make a clean bolt through it and smashes you, or come unhooked, even then perhaps it is better to have hooked and lost your fish than never to have hooked one all day long. Never hold a fish very hard when bolting through an arch of a bridge. If he is eased his natural ten- dency is to work up after the first rush, and then perhaps you may coax him away from the dangerous locality. In the case of a hatch, if a hooked fish runs through it, the rod can often be passed through point first, and the fish killed at your leisure in the hatch-hole below. With a fish rising under a bridge or at the upper end of it, either go above and drift WHERE TO CAST. 81 to him with a strong down-stream wind, or, what is far better, where possible go below and throw up with the under-handed cast. In very rough weather in portions of the stream which are usually smooth but are then ruffled by strong gusts of wind and perhaps occasionally lighted up by warm gleams of sunshine, fish are often seen feeding among the waves or quietly sucking in the flies dancing over the rippling surface. Such fish are generally travelling; in that case throw well above the rise, taking especial care to notice in which direction they are moving. Under such circumstances they are usually silly and unsuspecting, and should never be passed by without just one polite invitation in the shape of a floating dun perfectly dry and well cocked. Among dry-fly fishermen the remark is often heard that a particular throw is not likely to be successful, or that a fish rising in a particular place is, practically speaking, out of danger, owing to the fact that with the particular throw or in the par- ticular place the fly is bound to drag. The exact meaning of this expression is, however, only clear to a small minority of modern anglers, and as the main principle of dry-fly fishing and the success and want of success of the angler is absolutely dependent on this point, it is worthy of a proper definition. When a fly is said to be dragging, the meaning is, that it is travelling down the stream in some degree differently to the natural insect. This can occur in F 82 DRY-FLY FISHING. one of three different respects ; firstly, by the artificial fly travelling more rapidly than the natural ; secondly, by its travelling more slowly than the natural; and thirdly, owing to its drifting across the run of the stream, in each case leaving a more or less per- ceptible wake. The natural insects under normal conditions emerge from the covering in which they have been enveloped in the larva or nymph state, on the surface of the stream, float down at precisely the same pace as the current, and follow precisely the direction of the particular run in which they happen to be when they reach the surface; hence in every stream the probability of a shy fish like a trout or grayling rising at any artificial fly which takes a course opposed to that of the natural one is remote ; while in clear water or in rivers which are heavily fished it may be practically considered an absolute certainty that this remote probability will not come off. When the wind is blowing very strongly across the current, it sometimes causes the natural fly to drag and leave a wake, and when this happens the fish seldom or ever take it. This experience is derived entirely from streams which are heavily fished, and it would be interesting, as tending to show whether this shyness is inherent in fish or the outcome of a prolonged and advanced education, to know whether the same thing occurs on waters where the fly-fisher- man is comparatively unknown. . Now to deal with the various causes of the fly dragging, owing to its travelling more rapidly than WHERE TO CAST. 83 the stream ; and in all cases, where possible, to indi- ‘cate the means of modifying or counteracting this tendency. The most usual position in which the angler is troubled by this form of dragging is where he is casting across or partially across and up the stream, and where the swiftest portion of the cur- rent is between him and the point to which he is directing his fly. In such a case throwing in the ordinary way and with a moderately straight line, the strength of the current pressing against the reel-line forces it down-stream, thus causing a pull on the fly, dragging it more or less across, but at the same time making it travel at the pace of the strongest part of the stream, or at a greater pace than the natural fly under similar conditions. The most effectual means of obviating this is to make the cast in such a way that while the fly and last yard of the gut collar lie in a direct line, the remainder of the collar and a portion of the reel- line lie on the water in a curve the convex side of which tends up the stream. The strength of the current then acting on the belly of the line and pressing it down-stream does not cause the fly to drag before it has forced the convex side of the curve into a straight line, and, if the convexity of the curve has been sufficiently pronounced, until the fly is beyond the point where the fish is rising. Of course the longer the cast and the greater the disproportion between the extreme rapidity of the current and that at the feeding-place of the fish 84 DRY-FLY FISHING., the sharper or more convex this curve requires to be. To deliver the line in this curved state with the over-handed or ordinary cast the assistance of a slight up-stream wind is necessary; but with the under-handed cast, it is far easier to accomplish it with a slight down-stream wind than with one blowing directly up or across. In such a case it is not necessary to throw absolutely against the wind, but merely to cheat it slightly; and hence, if the angler finds the direction of his first cast is too ' much into the wind, he must correct the in- accuracy in the next, either by using less force, by easing the point of his rod in the act of delivery, or by increasing the length of the gut collar which he is using. If the direction of the wind is up-stream the fisherman must take up his position on the bank a very short distance below or even level with the rising fish; and, to allow for the action of the wind, the cast must be made as though his object was to place the fly slightly below the fish. With a down-stream wind it will, on the other hand, be necessary to direct the fly towards a point slightly above the fish. Some natural obstruction on the bank or an extremely long throw may render the under-handed cast difficult, or even impossible; and on rare occa- sions, too, the force of the down-stream wind may be too great to be overcome. In either of these cases the fisherman must place himself directly opposite to or slightly above the spot where the WHERE TO CAST. 85 fish is feeding. The ordinary over-handed cast must then be made, or if necessary, owing to the dis- tance being very great, the steeple-cast is used, and with either of them a slight downward cut is in- corporated, and at the moment that the fly has travelled out to the full extent of the line the cast is perceptibly checked and the fly lands on the water with the last yard of the gut straight, and the remainder of the gut and a portion of the reel-line in curves or loosely behind it. At the moment that the fly touches the water the hand is lowered to allow it to come over the fish be- fore the line is sufficiently taut to cause a drag, and as remarked in a previous chapter, sometimes it is necessary for the angler‘to walk at the same pace and in the same direction as the fly is floating down. When throwing across a very wide stream throughout which the current is flowing evenly there will frequently be a slight drag, especially if the line sinks; and in such a case the plan de- scribed above of placing the fly with a convex side of the curve or belly of the line inclined up-stream should be adopted, or else that of throwing a slack line. The meaning to be attached to the expres- sion throwing a slack line is, that the force to be used should be a trifle more than is necessary to put the line out straight, and in making this cast the hand must be checked slightly, so that, as before, the fly and last yard of the gut are extended, 86 DRY-FLY FISHING. while the upper part of the cast and a portion of the reel-line lie in curves or loosely on the water. Fish, more especially grayling, often rise in a smooth place immediately above a swift run, and in such a position a straight cast made up-stream from below lays the reel-line on the hardest of the run, and the fly, being on the comparatively still glide above, is dragged down by it. To avoid this drag, the place must either be fished from above with the half-drift, or from below with a good deal of slack line on the run, so that the fly is below the fish before it commences to drag. Another very favourite position for a rising fish is a small eddy or a slow-running bay under the bank, where most of the natural fly is carried by the stream. Both trout and grayling, especially large ones, being naturally inclined to get their food with as little work as possible, show a preference for spots into which the fly is carried by the action of the stream or wind, and where it is almost stationary, or at most moves very slowly. If the eddy is so strong that the natural insects drift in the opposite direction to the general run of the stream, the fish lies with his head down-stream, or rather down what is the general run of the stream; and if this happens in a very small space it is almost impos- sible to fish it without drag. Where, however, instead of an eddy there is a mere slackening of the stream, the difficulty may be overcome by putting WHERE TO CAST. 84 plenty of slack line so that no drag takes place until the fly is past the fish. With a strong up-stream wind, a fish rising directly above the angler is apparently in a very favourable position; but it must be remembered that the cast is a straight one, that is, that at the moment the fly lands on the water the line is extended to its uttermost, and hence any slight inequality of the stream causes the fly to commence dragging, and to continue dragging until it has travelled far enough to cause a slight slackness in the line. Anglers, from ignorance or want of observation, are often surprised at finding difficulty in rising fish in such a position, while the remedy is a very simple one. To obviate the drag, keep the point of the rod well in the air when casting, and immediately after the fly has fallen on the water drop the hand, and naturally with it the rod- point, so as to slacken the line and remove the strain, which would otherwise cause a drag. The foregoing are probably the only positions in which the artificial fly travels more rapidly than the natural. An artificial fly travels more slowly than the natural when throwing across, or partially across, the stream in places where the upper portion of the gut cast or the reel-line lies on an eddy. A slack line will to a certain degree prevent this; but such a place is never easy to fish, and the angler must not have great hopes of killing in such a position except, perhaps, on a rough or rainy day, or in 88 DRY-FLY FISHING. water slightly coloured, or late in the evening. With a very strong down-stream wind the natural fly itself is occasionally forced along at a greater speed than the normal pace of the current. In such a case the artificial fly drifts more slowly than the natural, but in rivers that are much fished or where trout are fairly well educated I do not find that they are very prone even to take the natural when drifting faster than the stream; and I at- tribute this to the fact that under such condi- tions even the natural fly leaves a slight wake on the water; and hence I would venture the opinion that this action of the artificial fly must not be considered as dragging; in fact, it is questionable whether under such conditions the fish will not at times take the imitation in preference to the living insect. The artificial fly drifts across the natural set of the stream under the following circumstances :— Firstly, when throwing across, or across and _par- tially down, as soon as the line commences to tighten. This particular form of dragging can some- times be delayed until the fly is past the fish by easing the hand and dropping the rod-point towards the water, or sometimes by walking slowly down- stream. Secondly, in deep pools through which a number of irregular cross currents or eddies flow. Such places are as a rule very disappointing, especi- ally in long casts, as the line is subject to the action of several of these currents, and, excepting in rough WHERE TO CAST. 89 weather or late in the evening, or perhaps when quite dark, should be avoided; if, however, fish cannot .be found rising elsewhere, some little time may be devoted to what is far more likely to be educating than catching them. Thirdly, where the water at the head or any other part of a shallow commences to widen, the stream usually divides into a number of fan-shaped runs, and a natural fly of course would drift down the run on which it happened to be when emerging from the nymph envelope. In the case of the artificial, however, if there happen to be one or more of these runs between the angler and the place where the fish is rising, it is dragged across the natural flow of the current, and hence, it may be inferred, will not be taken. If in such a place it is practicable to wade and stand immediately below the rising fish, on the edge of the very fan-run in which he is feeding, well and good; there is every chance of getting the fish. If, again, by standing well above the fish and half drifting to him, the fly can be got past him without drag, there is again a fair chance of killing him; but if it is too deep to wade, and the distance from the bank is too great for the second alternative above defined, the place is, to all practical intents and purposes, an impossible one, and the fish is safe. In indicating places which should, as a general rule, be avoided, it must be clearly understood that the idea is to give a few practical hints, especially to go DRY-FLY FISHING. the younger generation of dry-fly fishermen, to assist them in judging whether, under ordinary conditions, a fish feeding in a particular spot is a killable one or not. At the same time, in streams where fishermen are not often seen, and where the floating fly is almost unknown—in fact, where the education of the fish has not been carried to a high standard— the silly ones will occasionally take well in such places, and upset all the preconceived scientific theories on the subject. In the same way, in a gale of wind, with the surface lashed into heavy waves, or during heavy rain or hailstorms, or when nearly dark, these unlikely places may, even in the shyest of chalk-streams, be tried with success. To recapitulate briefly, a fish rising in any place where the fly is likely to drag is a_ difficult one to tempt. Such places are where the strongest of the current is between the angler and the feeding-place of the fish (Plate XIV. v); where throwing across a very wide stream, even where the current is uniform (the use of the slack-line, the bowed cast with belly of line up-stream, or the half- drift will prevent or delay the drag in these posi- tions) ; a small eddy or bay (Plate XIV. w); deep eddying pools (with some exceptions); a smooth glide at the head of a run (Plate XIV. 2); or amongst the fan-shaped runs where wading is im- possible, as shown on Plate XIV. y. In summer-time there are on most shallows por- tions covered with a very close, compact growth of WIT “SH3HLOX¥g NOLHO1aq [SP INoW'G See Sa NSS (nh RUSCEDENIT WOE che re WHERE TO CAST. gt quite short, bright green weeds, and for the purpose of briefly referring to such places it may be well to borrow friend Marryat’s terse cognomen for them— celery beds. Often and often trout are apparently rising well over these celery beds, and inexperienced anglers too often waste a considerable time in trying to tempt them. At first their inability to get even an offer induces them to try another pattern of fly, which in its turn is changed for another, and still another. At length, in despair, the fisherman makes cast after cast in rapid succession, generally not even taking the trouble to dry his fly, until, utterly worn out and with every muscle of his hand and arms aching severely, he abandons the attempt. In point of fact, fish in such a position are rarely, if ever, taking duns or winged flies of any sort, but are picking up any little larvee, caddis, shrimps, snails, or other molluscs drifting off the weed. This is no mere theoretical assertion, but the result of continual practical experiment, obtained by minute examination, day after day and year after year, of the contents of the stomachs of both trout and grayling taken under such conditions. Methinks the reader may with reason exclaim against the in- consistency of advising him in the first instance to avoid such places, and in the very next sentence refer- ring to an examination of the contents of the stomachs of fish—an examination which, in the natural course of events, must have been preceded by their cap- ture. True; but mark how this has been accom- 92 DRY-FLY FISHING. plished in nearly every case. When no rising fish could be found in a more favourable situation, the plan adopted has been to put up either a gold-ribbed hare’s ear (one of the best general patterns of duns known) or an orange bumble ; in either case to fish quite dry, throwing only at long intervals, and alto- gether resting the fish from time to time, until at length occasionally a rise has secured the trout or grayling. What the fish mistake the hare’s ear or bumble for is mere conjecture. The hare’s ear, possibly, is taken for a dun just emerging from the nymph envelope, and the bumble does certainly bear some faint resemblance to one of the orange tinted fresh-water shrimps. The above remarks as to fish feeding over “celery beds” apply in a lesser degree to fish rising in any part of the water, deep or shallow, swift or still, over heavy banks of sub- merged weed. The inexperienced dry-fly fisherman should gene- rally avoid places in which the stream is very swift. Such places are difficult, for two reasons; firstly, because it is not easy to time the action of the hand so as to raise the rod just quickly enough to keep the slack line off the water without dragging the fly, (and with the slack on the water one may generally expect to miss the fish altogether, or at best only to hook it lightly); secondly, because fish in a very swift run do not as a general rule feed in the most rapid portion of it, but take up their position just above the hardest part of it, in which case the WHERE TO CAST. 93 artificial fly must infallibly drag. There are nearly always fish feeding immediately below a wide plank bridge or wooden-trunk carrier, and every fisherman passing by is irresistibly impelled to study their movements. As a natural sequence he crouches down, creeps slowly below them, gets into position, dries his fly carefully, and takes a cast or two. How very seldom he is successful, and how rarely fish in such a place are easy to kill though really taking well! Is it because they are so frequently tried for? This may be, although I confess I doubt it, and am inclined to think that from some as yet unexplained effect of light and shade either the gut, the hook, or any little imperfection of shape or colour in the fly itself is in some way brought prominently to the notice of the fish, looking upwards against the dead background of the bridge or carrier. When only rising moderately well, fish in deep black-looking pools may as a general rule be con- sidered unpromising, although here again an excep- tion may be made at dusk, when, if no other rising fish can be descried, a few minutes may often be profitably devoted to them. At times, in such a place, a considerable number of fish are seen rising in close proximity, and after a number of casts, or until the angler succeeds in catching one, he is in doubt as to whether they are salmonide or not. If he can secure one, and finds it is a dace, there is no occasion to go on, as probably they are all dace ; at the same time it is frequently the habit 94 DRY-FLY FISHING. of an angler to pronounce fish that he cannot catch in a trout stream to be dace—and they certainly are very difficult to catch, and at times it is a convenient excuse for not killing a big trout. An example of this I can give on a club water well known on the Test. Two members starting in the morning saw two fish rising quietly under the shade of an old elm. Piscator No. 1 settled down to try them, and his companion walked on. An hour or so later Piscator No. 1 joined Piscator No. 2, and with some emphasis exclaimed at the presence of this wretched vermin in a trout stream, imagining and stating that he had wasted his valu- able time in vainly trying to tempt two big dace. Piscator No. 2, a somewhat incredulous but ex- perienced follower of the craft, made a mental note of the exact position of these two dace, and determined to devote a few minutes to them on his way home. When comparing bags, Piscator No. 1 was rather disgusted to find that two trout weighing somewhere about seven pounds were the dace which he had failed to beguile in the morning: I mention this to show how difficult it is to differentiate the rise of dace from that of trout, and how unsafe it is to be quite positive in these cases. As a general rule, a number of fish rising abreast of each other are probably dace. Trout feeding close together usually hunt one another, as also do grayling, but not so decidedly as trout. Dace generally travel in shoals and feed in shoals, WHERE TO CAST. 95 while trout feeding are more often in position one behind the other. Sometimes grayling, and large grayling too, may be seen rising in close proximity in these deep, still pools. As a rule, careful scrutiny will enable the angler to distinguish them from coarse fish, from the curious way in which when breaking the surface they show their dorsal fins, and at times, too, all doubt is removed by catching sight of the adipose fin, which latter, it must be mentioned, is an un- mistakable index only existing in members of the salmon family. A corner or bend into which the wind sets directly up-stream, and into which every fly floats, looks an inviting one, but it should be borne in mind that on a club or subscription water no passing angler can by any possibility fail to catch sight of fish feeding in such a place; and if they have been sedulously fished for only a few minutes previously, it is surprising how soon their suspicions are aroused, and how small a mistake will set them down. This same argument applies to any portion of a piece of water held in high repute by our brother fisher- men, either as a taking place or as one contain- ing an extraordinarily large number of fish, and my advice to the thinking angler is to pass such places by. At best he is far more likely to add to the already far advanced education of the fish than to the contents of his bag. When fishing for trout in hot calm weather, portions of the river in the 96 DRY-FLY FISHING. full glare of the sun, especially in mid-stream, should be avoided. But, at the same time, it must be remembered that the largest and freest rising grayling are usually to be found in such places, and this, I take it, is one of the most salient points of difference between the feeding-places affected by the grayling and by the trout. Wherever the bank is raised much above the level of the river (and such a place is shown on Plate XIV. z), the angler is more visible to the fish, and is hence placed at a great disadvantage; and if it be just as the shadows are commencing to lengthen in the evening on the western bank, it is often impossible, when standing up, to approach within twenty-five or thirty yards of the stream without scaring every fish over whom the fisherman’s shadow passes. If no fish can be found rising in a more favourable place, it is sometimes possible to get into position by crawl- ing slowly to the bank on all-fours, taking especial care that the shadow is not thrown beyond the edge of the sedges on the side of the river nearest to you. Above all, when stalking a fish do not forget to move slowly. A quick motion is not only more visible to the fish, and hence more likely to scare him, but a quick footstep causes more motion of the bank, which communicates vibration to the water, and, with it, an intimation to the fish of the angler’s presence. Having stalked into position, and, I presume, the fly being thoroughly dry, crouch down as much as pos- sible, throw with the under-handed cast only, and be WHERE TO CAST. 97 careful not to raise the point of the rod, nor to throw its shadow across the rising fish, either when throw- ing or subsequently when drying your fly, as neglect of this advice must invariably reveal the fisherman’s presence to the well-educated fish. With these precautions, it is sometimes possible to float a fly over such a place without setting the fish down; but, at the same time, it is astonishing how small a movement will scare him, a fact which will usually be brought home to the fisherman by the heavy fur- row caused by the headlong flight: of the frightened trout to the innermost recesses of the nearest bed of weeds. ( 98 ) CHAPTER V. WHEN TO CAST. Ir the first throw over a rising fish, before it has caught sight of the angler or the reflected wave of his rod, is accurately and delicately made, and if the fly floats in its natural position without drag or curl in the gut, you will probably rise, and possibly kill, the most highly educated trout or grayling in the clearest water, while the slightest mistake will as probably set the fish down for the next half-hour. But much of this success depends on when this first cast is made. It may often pay you better to wait ten minutes before the first cast is made than to make it as soon as you are in position. A good fish is in this respect not unlike a stag; you may take hours to stalk him, and find him in such a position that a favourable shot is almost an impossibility. The practical sportsman will wait for an hour until the stag changes his position before using his rifle, and it is certainly far better to kill after waiting than wait after scaring. The same rule holds good with fish. To put theory into practice, suppose the angler catches sight of a fish rising fairly well (selecting for . WHEN TO CAST. 99 choice one under his own bank), the first problem is to get within throwing distance without betraying your presence. Starting at thirty yards below the spot, and keeping well back, so as not to scare any other fish on your journey, crouch down as low as possible, and creep up, still in the crouching position, until within about twelve yards of the place. If your fly is not quite dry, you should dry it in the air before approaching. When the wind is gusty creep up during a cat’s-paw, get into position, wait during the succeeding calm, and cast when the next gust ruffles the water. Let out line sufficient in your judgment to cover the fish, and take the greatest pains to make the first cast accurately, but, above all, beware of waving your rod backwards and for- wards in such a position that the flash of it on the water is visible. This will infallibly leave you wait- ing in vain for the next rise of a fish that has pru- dently beaten a retreat and departed to happier hunting grounds. One more piece of advice. If all your precautions and efforts fail to tempt the fish, retire in the same crouching position, and do not stand upright and expose yourself clearly defined against the sky-line to the vision of the trout; even if you are unable to come back to him later yourself you may thus give the next passing fisherman a chance, and nothing more surely indicates a thorough sportsman than consideration for other anglers. Example, they say, is better than precept. A nobleman residing within a comparatively short dis- 100 DRY-FLY FISHING. tance of the metropolis had kindly granted me per- mission for a day in a small stream running through his park, adding, however, the well-considered ad- vice not to expect much sport, as the owners of a number of gardens extending to the edge of the water on the opposite side had always enjoyed—and, it is to be feared, much abused—the privilege of fishing and killing every trout they could get with worm and minnow. Arriving on the scene of action on an early June morning, I found the water pretty and promising-looking, with trees of all sorts along the banks, throwing out branches which met over the stream. In the whole length of a mile there was only one open place in which it was possible to fish with the usual return immediately behind the angler. To this spot the keeper took me at once. On cross- examining him, it appeared that practically all his lordship’s friends patronised this spot, but that one resident in the vicinity, who was generally most suc- cessful, never fished there, but, to use the keeper’s own expression, was “‘allers poking about among the trees with a short rod and a partiklar fly of his own tying.” On a prospecting tour, I gradually worked my way down to the very: bottom of the water, de- termined to fish it up with a dry fly wherever a pos- sible fish was rising. The stream was beautifully clear, and flowed at a fair pace. The only flies visible seemed to be iron blues, of which here and there an occasional specimen was floating down, not appreciated by the trout. At length one close to | WHEN TO CAST. Io the opposite bank was taken, then another, and then a third. The fish rose immediately under the bough of an alder overhanging not more than a foot above the surface. The artificial on the cast was a star- ling-winged hare’s ear, the body ribbed with flat gold; to my great delight, I succeeded at the first attempt in putting it about a foot above the fish’s nose. In such a position a trout seldom sees a float- ing fly, except the natural duns, and hence it was taken without the slightest suspicion. It being im- possible to raise the rod into a perpendicular position, it was some time before the first impetuous rush up- stream of the hooked fish could be checked, but at length the pressure of the rod, bent nearly double, turned him,.and eventually brought to the net a good-looking trout of 1 Ib. 6 oz. Continuing up- stream, and trying every feeding trout under the shade of the trees, each time the fly was accurately placed the first throw, the result was invariably that the fish rose at it, and was either killed, returned, or lost, while on each occasion that the first cast was in any way bungled the trout gave up rising. A con- siderable number of flies and strands of gut were left in the boughs of the trees, and eventually, at two o’clock, finding that my bag contained four brace of as pretty trout as ever charmed the eyes of an angler (weighing 114 lbs.), and having returned as many more, I gave up fishing, although the trout were still rising very well. During the whole time no fly ex- cept iron blues was seen, and yet every one of the 102 DRY-FLY FISHING. fish hooked or killed took the gold-ribbed hare’s ear, which by no possible stretch of the imagination can be considered an imitation of the bluish-tinged wings and purple body of the iron blue. Another illustration of the efficacy of the first cast occurred in September last with a party of three ona Hampshire stream. Our host, being desirous of try- ing the upper portion of his water until lunch-time, posted Mr. H. and myself at the lower end, which contains a very good stock of both trout and gray- ling, some being of great size. It was a sultry, oppressive day, with a southerly wind, and to one unaccustomed to these rivers the absence of move- ment on the surface of the water might have given the idea that there were very few fish. My friend H. had a fancy for a narrow piece about three hun- dred yards long, extending from a foot-bridge to a weir, in which were set a series of eel-traps, and leav- ing him there, I wandered aimlessly down to a taking- looking shallow at the bottom. Here I sat down, put my rod together, and laid it down with the cast in the water to soak the gut. Presently I saw a trout about 3 Ibs. just under my eyes busily engaged in appeasing his appetite with that aggravating in- sect the smut or fisherman’s curse. The bank being overgrown with sedges, I was invisible to him. After rising him short with three or four different patterns I pricked him, and put an end to my amuse- ment. The previous day I had dressed some red tags with a bit of scarlet ibis instead of wool, and WHEN TO CAST. 103 with a desire of trying the improved pattern, knotted one to my cast. Just where a cart-track crossed the river in the widest part of the shallow a fish rose several times at the pale watery-looking duns which were hatching. I crawled up into position, and after measuring the length of line by a preliminary flick over the meadow, at the first cast the fly landed right, and never having been wetted, of course floated admirably. There was a quiet rise, and down- stream the hooked fish went like a shot, and after a good fight succumbed—a grayling, 2 lbs. t oz. Think- ing it would be friendly to give H. the tp as to the killing fly, I started to walk up, but before going a hundred yards saw the head and shoulders of a big fish out of water in the centre of a deep but rather rapidly running horseshoe turn in the river. Crouching down behind the bank, I waited another rise to make sure of the exact spot, and at the first cast again the fly was rightly placed, and the gray- ling (one of 2 lbs. 9 oz.) was landed after a grand rush. Meanwhile H. could not get a single chance, but at my request put up one of the red tags. But it was of no avail. Each time he tried a fresh fish the first cast did not come off accurately, and the fish went down. Fly after fly and fish after fish were thus tried in turn, but all to no purpose, as, although a first-rate performer usually, he seemed on that day to be out in his judgment respecting the first cast. Ex uno disce omnes. Many anglers will be disposed to urge that it is 104 DRY-FLY FISHING. a matter of comparative indifference to them as to when theyehrow to a rising fish, and that the only important point is where they throw, or, in other words, to place the fly accurately. No doubt they are, to a certain extent, right in their contention, and the question of accuracy and delicacy combined, especially in the first cast over a fish, is, as a general rule, by far the most essential object. Yet with very shy fish there is a right and a wrong moment to throw, and hence the subject is worthy of some con- sideration by all dry-fly fishermen who are desirous of following up the more scientific portion of the question. To a mere pot-hunter, whose only object is to kill as many fish as he can in a given time, it will not be an interesting study; his tactics are simply to keep on throwing over every feeding fish he can see from morning to night; and although he imagines he will get a larger bag, it is one of the many cases in which his very eagerness defeats itself, and certainly he does not derive the same satisfac- tion from the pastime as the less jealous and more unselfish fisherman who is worthy to be styled a sportsman. With a trout poised close to the surface of the water, and merely opening his mouth slightly to suck in each passing fly, it is scarcely possible to be wrong; but when in such a position he is only taking one out of six or seven flies floating over him, the least splash, or sometimes even the mere gleam of the gut, will be enough to set him down, WHEN TO CAST. 105 and the farther from the bank the position of the fish the more gut-shy he seems to be; hence the axiom: “Never fish with duns one in mid-stream when you can find one rising under the bank.” With a trout, the true secret under such conditions is not to be in too great a hurry to make your first cast, and not to throw too frequently. Cast a perfectly dry fly, cocked with greatest care and accuracy, twice, or at most thrice, and then rest the fish for three or four minutes, or at least until he has again risen at a natural; then throw once or twice more. If this second attempt proves unavailing a study of the fly on the water is frequently useful, as a change to one merely a trifle lighter or darker, or a size smaller, may be found successful, although it is to a great degree doubtful whether the trout are so dreadfully particular as to a mere shade of colour. On the other hand, it must be admitted that a number of the same flies, hatching at the same time, are to our eyes identically alike in colour, form, and size. Do not be too sure, having seen a good many of any particular fly on the water, that fish are taking that fly, as when a new species hatches out it may be sparsely distributed among the prevailing insects, and the fish may be selecting the last-hatched fly, which, if you are below, will account for your not seeing that fly floating past you in that particular run; and fish, as a rule, take every fly on its first appearance in preference to one which has been up some time. As an example, after the olive-dun has been up for 106 DRY-FLY FISHING. some weeks, the first appearance of the iron-blue should be persistently looked for, as very often, after the first day, fish will over and over again let the olive pass them, and take every iron-blue floating down. A point which is intimately and inseparably con- nected with the question of when to throw is when not to throw; and with trout it should be remem- bered that they are more easily scared, and hence should be cast over less frequently and rested more often than grayling. A bad moment to select to cast over fish rising only moderately well is just after they have taken a natural fly, as they frequently go down with the fly in their mouths to ruminate, or possibly enjoy the flavour. A very shy fish, how- ever, in still, smooth water, on a hot, calm day, can occasionally be tempted by a good imitation imme- diately after he has risen at the natural insect, or, as Ronalds puts it, by ‘‘ casting into the ring of the rising fish.” The disturbance he has himself caused by the act of rising seems to cover any little splash made by the cast, which under other circumstances would set him down. This plan is specially success- ful with smutting fish, as they usually come to the surface, and moving slowly along, suck in some six or seven of these aggravating little wretches, and then go down below to digest them. As previously remarked, a trout rising in a small slack bay or eddy is a very difficult fish to tempt, owing to the artificial fly generally travelling down WHEN TO CAST. 107 the stream, and being dragged by the line out- side, while the natural is almost stationary, or else drifts up with the eddy. In a place of this descrip- tion a fish takes duns or spinners, very much in the manner above described with curses; coming to the surface, and moving with barely perceptible motion just under water, he clears off every fly in the bay or eddy, and then goes down to await a fresh hatch. Should a sudden gust blow all the flies in the eddy off the water, the observant angler would often succeed in deluding the fish by placing the artificial just in the bay; or sometimes even the fish will, when his stock of food in the eddy is thus exhausted, come outside or on the edge of the run, where the cast.is a very simple one, and when the moment is propitious. When fishing a slow-running stream, it is a sen- sible plan to leave your fly on the water as long as it will float. A very good illustration of the wisdom of this course occurred to my friend Marryat in my presence. It was during the later part of the May-fly, at Newton Stacey, when the fish were taking the spent gnat. In an almost stagnant bay of a small side stream a quiet rise had been seen. Across the neck of this bay a plank was extended to serve as a bridge when walking up the stream. Without a moment’s hesitation, Mr. Marryat cast his spent gnat over the plank into this little bay, and waited for some minutes, when his patience was rewarded by a bold rise. The moment the fish was 108 DRY-FLY FISHING. hooked, the keeper, at his request, slid the plank away, and the trout—a good one, nearly 3 lbs.— was dragged out into the stream and there killed. Not one in a hundred anglers would have waited so long for the rise, and the smallest movement of the rod would have produced a drag on the fly, and infallibly scared this wary old stager. With grayling the question of when to cast is not so important as with trout. The former, when feed- ing on surface food, usually lie in mid-stream and deep down in the water, or even on the gravel at the bottom. ‘Those curious lozenge-shaped eyes are designed for looking upwards, and from a depth of two and a half to three feet can distinguish the tiniest insect floating on the water. Grayling rise almost perpendicularly to the surface, and hence often rise falsely, or, in other words, miss the fly, either natural or artificial. When, however, they do secure it, they turn slowly over and go vertically down to their previous position, and in the motion of turning over often show their large dorsal fins and tails above water, thus making that unmistak- able rise so well known to all in the habit of fishing for them. Practically speaking, the only moment not to throw to them is when they are thus going down head-foremost ; and from their generally lying so much deeper in the water, they are less easily scared than trout, will stand being thrown over much more frequently, and require less resting. Fish generally rise best at the commencement of WHEN TO CAST. 109 the hatch of a particular fly on any day, and this is accounted for in two ways—first, because they, like other living things, are more hungry and keen at the commencement of their meal; secondly, because, although, as before said, it is questionable whether they are ever as particular to mere question of shade in the artificial fly as the fisherman is, they have not quite got the colour in the earliest portion of the hatch, and hence are not quite so critical as to the pattern of artificial as later on. There is, beyond doubt, however, much to be urged on this point, as every experienced fisherman will remember in his own case numerous instances of days when at the commencement of the rise he has killed a brace or two of fish with a fly at which they would not look later on. A further study of the natural insect having in such an instance enabled him to change for a better match of colour or size, he has found them come on the artificial again, and been again successful. Another point worth noticing is, that it generally happens with a good hatch that the Ephemeride come down in droves of six or seven; then there is a small space or break, then another drove, fol- lowed by another break, and so on. In trying a fish taking nearly every fly of such a hatch the moment to cast can hardly be wrongly chosen; but when the fish are only taking moderately, it is a good plan to watch for the drove coming down, and throw a thoroughly cocked dry fly in the break, so that when floating down it heads the natural insects. ( 110 ) CHAPTER VI. STUDIES OF FISH FEEDING. A DRY-FLY fisherman requires at all times to keep his senses of hearing and sight at full tension, and to note systematically every circumstance or move- ment in the water likely to betray to him the locale of a feeding fish. ‘This very state of tension is often likely to lead him astray, as straining every nerve to hear or see the rise makes him superlatively sensi- tive to the faintest sound or smallest disturbance on the surface of the water; and hence, in his ex- citement, he is often irresistibly impelled to waste his time in drying his fly and floating it over what, after all, does not turn out to be a rising fish—that is, one sucking in winged insects on the surface of the stream. A past master, however, who has often spoilt a favourable day by this useless hunt after the impos- sible, will always make quite sure that the apparent rise to which he intends devoting his attention is a real one, and as a first point establishes to his own satisfaction that it is a fish, and not, as well may be, a rat sitting close to the edge in a bay out of sight and feeding on some of the various forms STUDIES OF FISH FEEDING. III of vegetable food he affects, or a dabchick diving under water when scared by the angler’s approach, and then just putting his beak above water a few yards higher up or down the stream to take a fresh breath, giving very much the appearance of a rise. If this apparent rise is seen twice or more times in succession in exactly the same place it is almost certain to be a fish, as the dabchick generally swims or dives either up or down, and repeats the apparent rise elsewhere. An obstruction, such as a floating stick carried to and kept against the bank by the curreat, or a bobbing rush only just reaching to the top of the water, or a curling eddy turning over stone, frequently produces very much the appear- ance of a rising fish. Having determined that the movement is caused by a fish, it is far from certain that because that fish is making waves, or apparent rings or bubbles, he is rising at or feeding on surface food. He may be bulging, tailing, smutting, or minnowing ; or the commotion may be brought about by two fish fighting. Of the symptoms indicating bulging, tail- ing, or smutting I will treat in a later portion of this chapter. When minnowing, trout usually make a quick dart through the water, and the fry are often seen leaping to escape their open jaws. When fighting, they generally rush headlong at each other several times in rapid succession, until the stronger has driven the weaker off his vantage- ground. It is well to note that, except when 112 DRY-FLY FISHING. spawning, grayling very rarely indulge in pugilistic encounters. Being certain that the movement in the water is that of a fish, and of a fish feeding on flies, the angler’s next difficulty is to spot the rise, or to place its position. When under the bank this may generally be accomplished by fixing the eye on some striking object opposite to it, such as an extra high spear or a particularly bright patch of sedge, or a flower, or a brown hollow place in the ground, remembering, however, that the ring made by the rise must naturally drift down-stream, so that the rise is almost invariably placed below its actual position. I believe that this inaccuracy of judg- ment is increased owing to the sense of hearing usually giving the first warning to the angler; and in the space of time occupied by the sound travelling to the fisherman’s ear, in addition to the moment which must elapse between hearing and seeing, the mark of the rise is carried some distance farther down than one would expect. When, however, the rise takes place in mid-stream it is far less easy to place it, as, in addition to the difficulties above referred to, the only guide to assist the angler in determining the precise spot is, generally speaking, the apparent distance and direction from some rough run or break on the surface, itself a changing and moving object. Sometimes a rising fish is accurately marked down, and a good imitation of the natural fly on the STUDIES OF FISH FEEDING. 113 water floated over him without result. The next rise of the same fish is three or four yards higher up, and the angler, in response to it, either crawls up or lengthens his line the required distance, and covers the last rise again with no result, and a few minutes later the fish is again seen taking a dun, having travelled three or four yards still higher up the stream. This wild-goose chase may, in some in- stances, be repeated time after time, until the trout has, by successive steps, moved as much as forty or even fifty yards. At length no more rises are seen, and the natural inference is, that the fish is set down. Looking back, however, to the place where the first movement of the fish was observed, he may be found steadily continuing his interrupted meal there in safety. Such a fish is a most tantalising one, usually of large dimensions, well fed, and in good condition ; very shy either of gut or the smallest mistake, and as often as not, has been hooked many times before, so as to be quite alive to the dangers of the position. If not hooked the first cast, the fisherman is advised to leave him altogether, and find a more unsuspecting prey elsewhere. It is not an unusual occurrence to see a trout working slowly and gradually up-stream close under the bank, rising occasionally on his journey, and sucking ina fly here and there. If this is noticed, before making a cast wait patiently, and do not throw until he has settled down to feed in one place; the fish is simply sauntering up to his habitual salle 4 H 114 DRY-FLY FISHING. manger, whetting his appetite with a passing insect as a sort of hors d’euvre, and will presently commence his dinner, taking his own particular seat at a favourite corner. Whena fish has thus settled down to feed in a particular spot, it is said on the Test to be in position. I have observed that a fish will, at times, come up-stream a short distance to take each natural fly floating over him; but more frequently drops slowly back tail first, with his nose close to the fluttering insect before either taking or refusing it, in either case returning to his original position. It is well to notice these little peculiarities, and place the fly accordingly either well above or comparatively close to the place where the fish is lying. When looking up or down from any great distance, it is almost impossible to locate the rise exactly. Possibly taking a quick glance at the bank, noting some striking object apparently opposite to it, and at the same time measuring mentally the distance from the margin, may assist, but it is impossible under such circumstances to spot the rise accurately. The fisherman may be advised in such a case to crouch, keeping down, well away from the water’s edge, and taking advantage of any shelter to keep out of the extended range of vision of the trout’s sharp eyes ; to creep up until he has, as nearly as he can judge, got into position, and then wait patiently for a second rise. Natural impatience often impels an active-minded man to fish on spec, persuading himself that he has the place all right, and then STUDIES OF FISH FEEDING. LI5 he keeps on persistently flogging, in the hopes of tempting his quarry. One of two results will cer- tainly ensue; either he keeps on throwing below the fish and tires himself by his useless exertion, or else his fly is placed too far above, in which case it usually drags; this sets the fish down for the next half-hour, besides adding a little more to his already advanced education. Nothing is more aggravating to an enthusiastic angler than, after patiently casting for half an hour or more over a feeding trout or grayling, to find, when hooked, that it is a wretched little finger- ling instead of the noble three-pounder his fancy painted it. In some cases it is impossible to form any estimate of the size of the fish from observation of the rise, but in other cases experience enables a fisherman to arrive at a fairly good estimate from the nature or position of the rise, the sound made, or other circumstances ; and this power of estimating size is an important factor in the comparative success of a number of men fishing the same stream on the same day and under the same conditions. The most careful, the most experienced, and the most observing are, however, at times quite out in their judgment on this point. In speaking of rises, it may be explained, in passing, that the expression is used to describe the act of a fish taking flies on the surface of ‘the water, whether Ephemeride, either in the sub- imago or the imago state, winged Phryganide on 116 DRY-FLY FISHING. the surface of the water, or flies hatched on land, such as the cow-dung, red ant, &c. A fish taking caddis, shrimp, or snails is said to be tadling, from its tail appearing at intervals above water, when the head is buried in the weeds; when feeding on larve or nymphe it is described as bulging, from its motion through the water; and when taking “curses,” or black midges or gnats, it is spoken of as smutting. Probably the best means of judging size from the rise is derived from the sound produced by the act of breaking the surface when taking a fly, and the comparative weights may be said roughly to be arranged in a scale of harmony, the heaviest fish being the lowest bass, and smallest the highest treble; the intermediate notes indicating the inter- mediate sizes. In applying this test of sound, it must, however, be remembered that it is only ap- plicable to the case of a fish remaining stationary and sucking in the fly passing over the spot where it is lying. The case of a fish following and dash- ing at a passing fly produces some confusion in the scale. The volume of sound is to a considerable extent dependent on the relative size of the insects themselves. A fish only just separates his lips sufficiently to enable him to take in the fly, and experience tends to show that the shyer the fish the less widely he opens his mouth, so that with a small insect the sound is comparatively faint, and with a larger one louder in proportion.