*
Sas
SF
Hee
Goruell Gaw. School Library
HAMI so
AW YORK NEGLIGENCE CASES
CLASSIFIED
"\y COMPLETE COLLECTION OF ALL REPORTED NEGLIGENCE
Cases DECIDED BY ALL THE NEW YORK STATE
Courts TO JANUARY 1, 1898
CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO THE FACTS
PREPARED AND EDITED BY
T. F. HAMILTON
OF THE’NEW YORK BAR
NEW YORK”
REMICK, SCHILLING & CO.
1898
B3a744
CoPyYRIGHT, 1898
BY
T. Fk. HAMILTON
PRESS OF
Weep-Parsons Paintin Company,
ALBANY, N, Y,
PREFACE.
This collection of classified cases is an elaboration of a practical
system of arrangement that the editor has employed in his prac-
tice for many years and found serviceable in brief-making.
The negligence cases of this State so arranged that precedents
on the facts may be readily selected, without recourse to digests
on the law or text-books, has been found to be of great value
to the editor and he believes cannot fail to be of service to his
professional brethren. The difficulty of finding all the adjudged
cases involving a similar state of facts and the same relation
between the plaintiff and defendant is reduced to a minimum by
such a classification as is here offered to the profession.
In preparing a brief in a negligence case, it generally takes a
long and tedious examination of digests and text-books to satisfy
the practitioner that no adjudged case upon similar facts has
escaped him. As the cases are arranged by topics and sub-topics,
all the case law upon a given state of facts can be ascertained in
a very brief time. When it is considered that there are nearly
six thousand negligence cases in the State of New York, reported
in more than twenty thousand: places, the practical value of this
book as a working tool cannot be overestimated.
To the Jist of references where each case has been reported, has
been added all the references where the case has been dis-
tinguished, criticised, followed, etc.; thus showing in one place
the whole history of the particular case and its present status in
the various courts.
All the cases decided up to January 1, 1898, are contained
in this.work.
Attention is especially directed to the list of topics beginning
on page VII.
I take pleasure in acknowledging the valuable assistance of Mr.
Edward S. Griffing of the New York bar in the preparation of this
volume.
NEw YORK, /une, 1898. T. F. HAMILTON.
EXPLANATION.
The value of this work as a labor saver will be greater as the
system under which the cases are classified is clearly understood
by the practitioner.
To this end, a short explanation of the method of using the
work, and the headings of the divisions and subdivisions are given.
When a case, or set of facts, is to be looked up, the practitioner
glances through the list of topics to find the topic showing the
same relation between plaintiff and defendant as the case in
hand. The main divisions of the topic are then run down until
a division is found into which the case in hand would naturally
fall. Under this division will be found subdivisions. In some
instances the subdivisions are in turn subdivided several times,
and each time, the practitioner proceeds by a process of elimina-
tion until the proper subdivision is reached.
It is recommended that all the divisions of a topic be reviewed.
at first, so as to obtain a mental grasp of the theory of the subdi-
viding; in this way the proper subdivision is more readily seen.
In the main divisions, all ambiguous headings have been elimi-
nated as far as practicable, thus leaving but one division for any
given set of facts. In some of the more minute subdivisions this
has been only partly possible, but whenever practicable it has
been done.
It should be noted that some of the subdivisions have been in
turn subdivided according to the facts, when the law would be
practically the same. On this account if enough precedents can-
not be found under a particular subdivision, it is suggested that
the subdivision on either side might contain cases decided under
identically similar legal rules even if the facts were somewhat
different.
A short catch line has generally been prefixed to each case;
this has been omitted where the headings of the classification
indicate the facts sufficiently to point out what the busy prac-
titioner needs, or when the facts are-so complicated that it was
impracticable to digest the case in a few lines. >
Ny oH
Wwwwnrnnrd dN HN SH HN DH ND AR HH HH eH WR AR AR A
PP HOD SYAN RAE AOD SA AKHAWN H
SO OI ANA &
TOPICS.
ANIMCAUS iis. anise ORAS ERO RRNA
ASSIGNEES AND RECEIVERS...... 0.0 cece seeesveeee eaten 19
BAILMENTS ......+ sda elo pliatel whe Gm men Re RIS Metehdeinistens Jams HO
Bitits, NOTES AND Cuzcks.. Kanteen cee gueh dial oe etdruentien 20
Civit Damace ACT...... Seite RG inde tdesershendeiners Diener. 3T
Common CARRIERS — PERSONS.......... Rieter enetacarneceni, 88
Common CAnRIens — PROPERTY 1562 .5.ncc0etwevenceoasea G8
CORPORATIONS — MUNICIPAL... cc pe cece ce cece eee eens va) 932
CORPORATIONS — PRIVATE........ aohaialeanaaahinean gpg in aiteredsiatsia oe. 148
Evectric Licht anp Gas LIGHT COMPANIES............ 160
EXxeEcuToRS, ADMINISTRATORS AND TRUSTEES, os ce cke se teace esd a tsced oars avere gael shi aller ais
CLASSIFICATION, xiii
. COMMON CARRIERS — PERSONS — Continued.
DEALIOM Site wisvave sia ase weve cei eraissaravatn stove glee aca anshe di grarernavale abel 81
JAP PYOACHES 25,25 ce se/eiarcce. ava ar gid assole: waiter e) yigennnd- afore Me love 81
Plath OT iri Sis sh ectis: sh Feliu Stasis Sos oa elie dlp duped. dab re verpilcnertlas lor evehe 81
TOY cise “sin iene oerertae ee gia gue wertoeen rahe oi aig 81
AGUS IN ELIV Gy, sa. 20i ae elena Ga crn See sig oar oes Hislis ace ta ekacaanSecvady Kets 82
Space between platform and car..............00 82
Meats S16 OG: 2a. srcan sie sissee’ spietav diresp: es tres oh Suse siya idk 83
MEATS cr cvevts cha saa cece latesas era anil wes sons a nae pnarbvianavaneseal avarienss 84
MG Ye taaedacctncnsasancracats lee quetn acta ae icarei antennae 84
UG La SiH ao. sg anc ase asm anciatiera dna ciaraterelaceuetelawanaue eis 84
Sudden jerks in transit. ........ 0... cece eee cece near eaee 85
TVG EL ses ceva: faneneaga tiaras ates satel tavetydescyeietoraene mera eet ween Sete are aa 85
Tian Go, ssa: xine eisicgale ote ayerenarailersiw ate Cadiee beara Gea wis ees 85
MATIN Cs taca sera: sara iaiginaeregle armani Rie ene SI ae 86
ALES PASSELS iwi tlaisnie cr cues ceaans ae Wishes Oe anaes TRIE REC 86
Steam TOACS x casera tueate dtesaterepare she arahera penne oa vera takes 86
SEPCEE TOd OS jaja nie cietiia alvin aiotaacate/oiadg's ear areaet nara aree ane 88
Tripped on obstructions, holes, etC.........0.eeeeeee oe - 89
MeSSelS WrECk Ed isiciansuleinin Waictesewrave uniomreveratoatenioneenteuins 89
MMC TAS SIME oi cs eracasarshay ee atesaeieevease ence myiee sisioinie ee vias . 89
No facts stated......... eaiwiieceisena etal rel ebai hw ane ae ieee 89
Steam: TOAdSus cecirugeanre aedeaeaeredotis anes wows sis 89
StPEEE TOAGS cietdie csi scte etectele ae ieletaia ation atwianas Aiveraieie ove 91
UMICIAS SINE Gs i sote beasevanscoaue eis saienefeite beeserelaruminsr adarhionade 93
COMMON CARRIERS — PROPERTY... ...... ccc cc ce eeee 95
Bag ga veraca-ns ese eieiiws sees wee toles sae GEER REE CREE 95
Delays secscie: aie: ste ney oie ad hr as ater aderaleranar ain wie anal a6 aie See shen oreLare 95
Delivery; wrong..........6. ee Rn eee 95
T5088; ANG: WAJUL Vee: anesaaraieciee wieteareerae, seraieisisjoneus ai eieaaiowwie a 95
AP CENOtis cis sardedaaGat em oaiaardirnmiearoniaenm nas 95
PIT Gos cess Srey suai eliah encase’ sita arg? aud oteiarevolel awit eraaeaein 95
NEE as srterdeine diesel rOsinersiner ad sie mummers eels 96
Unelassified . 2. sce cece ee cw ee ee fash ais heat te 96
Lan Gk orcas winieiena terae@era ge eve a venous 96
Manin Gicscrnccm mre scorns ae seiscw si baaaee siete 97
In. transits ve sie de cecsseursaieterserenoe ek ast gelcpialreaanarens 97
PinGtraae sig wun dt ved siespierstetine'g wie ois ale ware eee oe aee 97
VCS thas aisrsisatere Beetewre wre notes a wie omanlen osnis 98
Unclassified........ wiele vera ae aeObd a aia aieliafeahgheta @ 98
Land i e-- ie ceign ese rastNieseraslinestela), teyeyasverenesMpsnehs 93:
Marine ............ sera ehibvesots nsksuavavedscchpioteys 99
< Transfer in harbor......... cchaesee pee 99
Unclassified. ...... 2... cece eee eee 99
On connecting lineS........ cee cece cece nes 100
UnClassif$ed sis «wos ine aaesch ek apne eee ee ee nein 100
Weani dic-acevatiders. cpastancenidengs dn eal cinssereanoandioes 100
MATING hasan arace de wine case é ols Hoe bear ema eres 101
X1V CLASSIFICATION.
COMMON CARRIERS — PROPERTY — Continued.
Baggage EXPLESS..... cece cee eee cece tree eee teen eee 102
Delivery; Wrong... .... cece cece eee eee cece tenes 102
Loss and injury....... Ae Ae as MOA NN we ECA ee abe aes 102
At Cépotssasex ceeds ates ws aieanew esis it Yi sm Fa eee) bs 102
Fire and thefticc.i ies cccs cows vad deve aaes 102
Unelassified .434sceweo ince daa baw ya cie cere 102
Tit £raTSIt 2 gpice de awl oa ae Jalsa binis's Sayeed Sew eee 102
Unelassifi ed iss: tcc ie sare ie ous ace aye ow wis ahead aie nigel awe oe 103
EXPreSSies-ov ave une mee edie dae meee Solas Gee ip tease dgpoxe supra sz 103
C. O. D. business...... .ee.ee> jase tensta aed ave NEA ale 6 103
Dela yiiix as weir aiaiape wie euereianite Gis eee ate w aig Gt Se ee aK 103
DOLLY 689 isis oe ns -ar0 ote es a 8's aka legarinsole cotta anes Gita Rua aay ate 104
Refusal....... iSociy at oua aie latter Sap Gee tane din ecmaaysvatitcevare aavsye a 104
WOTE ssise eie-apercers Gone lets SDhlavea ele wien dus Glob gious ier staitenel einntsa 104
Loss and injury...... cece cece cece vcee oe ina BSR 104
At depot..........- be Rauie Pgicare acratehe ee nae eae seee 104
PPO hee caetenes anes SE REALS Sie ere eRe jena ee I04
Theft, .s.c00s CUS CON eee GaeceReaeed wen eet 105
In transit......... eo cee So Walieweagele oe ee 105
Fir@ws weave ve xenon Ce ee ee ee ee 105
Thefts. cc ivae aveare vests Be aig cee Se ata at cat a aaa oa ours 105
Wreck......... ams eaverat's area alee aac Bites aie ares 105
Unclassified...... ths the 5) Fiohe GOA HEME GE dees eos 106
Oni CONMECEING MES oe asaya ois aye iare ee gd asere Sees ee bee 107
Unclassified...... si pres veh aig oc sania dantera | “Was aap ahah ee eae 107
Unclassified.......... oF eecsiny eitis ita oii oho oka aoe tytianes Sete 107
PRG SH Gs fas sad cee urea atin er 1iS.8 91s 0s Se loya raha She alistexe eiey Say asereze 108
DN GT AY igie: sais core 5 gueit iene ane tana tacs a tekays tetas tye enapseatrorenesss sete SOS
Pay SETI OS oi cis-ians seu cs eile sosm iain aethe epeaeauane aia ute vues. 108
On connecting in€S....... cece eee cee eee ees oe. 108
Unclassified...... Beige encabsanissaye Sseyedects Basiuanscaye 109
Land) wats sceweeee isis a es Sustayevens es pyar acai tae Cexets 109
Live stock........ 2. er ee +2. TO9
Unclassified....... eee ee ee 110
Marinewiicn se ssid savecacaw e343 wee caw ees III
Boats frozen in...... de ae ow wei ie aS at 111
Unclassified.......... Jhen eerie see tex Ill
DELiVEr ys site vie craingeaease a2 ean ays ee reowns DIZ
Refusal... ....... Bw ee ane Iai aire cons Ara sehe eases 112
WHONE soap care Kosi vels a8 abled ce wire geen ood eas: TZ
aA eesti ays: ie. ape' cue ecaretore eh oie de Se sia bates ogee ated 112
ve oa atta aa ae: Bei 6 in 52h Silene Mew eaey 113
TsOSSe ANG Wi PTY ss og: esseriie ese: 4 wins Wiese ee! eaa) a era eae «ies SETS
At CEpOty cess case viene te Sean t Piswtiwiewe’Seieig stew CTS
Fire..... iriageaeesers aa iaea lala) sone fois Bien casaaeh axes 113
After arrival.......... a iabiycgy BONS toa aye samecaro see 113
Unclassified ........ 0... 0e eee ce eeeeee TIS
Mreshets ascssucsuesees eisnese.e's a lalarwie are Sore Note lene oye SLO
RAT sss has ak wre: cue neoracs ee pied: cis dteyais lowe eicvere’ EO
Theftisws 2 aecrcaes Sheudvedacese dud avs caaeaiousne wena sets oe EZ
CLASSIFICATION, XV
COMMON CARRIERS — PROPERTY.
Freight — Loss and injury — Continued.
Ta £8 AS ites acs oscars praroassia iA SEN TORa ieagicas T18
HIP Gi cece ase teeataamieniel motreremtars Pwsnheehn wees secon 118
Lal Gp tiare ance’ eka aerated Sowiee ee ees 118
’ Marine........... wre ata Was ae nis Sci tieeita are Soule 119
Intermediate consigneés........ cc cece ee eens 119
SEER sa osiesgecunauerbvera eck wantetoastten a eeneAeuad entaiw 120
IGANG arg ded wtaseeaee Sieh ateav iaaGrw seater ares 120
Marines nos cunieukcew ada auaniieleeesate 120
WNC laSSIN CO canak enka besten tenses eamas nares 120
LOAN cidink' iaidane nis sdaalnera Sarees Mewes Keak, 120
EEOZ EN wus -acuie-cariecrardetdaien, went 120
Live stock............ etexceins sans, 120
Unlassiied..o sasecewencianaeees 120
Matin Giese arse aseestavers aideissiae over éaineaa U2?
Casks leaked.......... sheissnaaraecreusts 122
CONISTON gate rs cityg eyo andere een uies 122
FFOZEti oe. ocic a esheets o-ayii areca 123
Vessels: leaked, o .6c scene Gogo gacge waves 123
WHECR Sos saseia aise bis ow aie teredea Ace Meee ecesen 123
Unclassified............. Sires Marasari caters 124
On connecting lines...... 0. eee e ce cee een eee 126
PIT Oi. rcs gens hs eye recsteaya Metuniatt oho eeginalotienatneysleumacnes 126
PRC E DOE se caus Bon esyoiasacah lances ata. o'biehe. afavelewis ns 126
In, tranSiticcec ieee sieteiecearnehieeesiaatees 127
Theft........ pvieadsousals Shebsces ati cians afeeSerassemner 127
Wrecks....... iis Woaidenas dt ahetlsicdevanguavasoustars acheiice tabintelert 127
Ula eds iaieissse esi veyiesoslasoieia Gauecs oo Sinrase dd Rina ore 127
Unclassified sciences: cece sein anaielieiversiaid vere toaverennis 6% iciee 129
Unclassified weccccc ccc See eae eee wane wT 130
Special and private carriers............... sidiinna Maren . 132
TruckMen.« <.2600% seesaw cean wns ai diaracaatens a Sestak oie aed . 132
CORPORATIONS — MUNICIPAL..............005 Shevana bees 132
Crowds and mobs ..............+- a ctacils biacetey aaa davesearsien: ZZ
Cities........ . lig sta: in Bulb coca Batata. te Wektalee ae ae ‘ 132
Counties...... Giesastons ee re ee eres seearees E34.
BIOS). cecadeca 28a e sare rete a ouiete wats daeenieiis Bie s aeinacets 134
OMCEIS 25:0 ct aiges Redd weaenee sie Heetwabse sees evaiew 135
CY, soieiteacelne eae aisle be eh Wate Jewels Reean RE eR REN 135
COUMEY. cas cele’ swieseaseies Sisco Biate wane ba sielNNe Rt ioe seaa 136
CEP S ia ooh so saieue oveaneseisoalncuere eed rete si anaweaesen” 1396
Sheriffs..... ncieanencts suds Bie diets, Stare wea ate Kesewseameren B36
Supervisors......... Sansa iieeae em Meee seen wees: EZO
Surrogates ........ seeeceeees De seieeweadee ans 139
TYr@aSurers ...c cece rece sce rsccccccs sew aera scene 130)
TOWM ... 1.6 cee cece cece rece eee recent eer ctonn eens 140
Unclassified ie. cits ieeeiecveie etc ee ta ee eee wee wou LAE
Presentation of claim.......... Siaveieie aoaecs aus caw ide ehmntaoseeees 141
CIES ixise cloves neues sisaeedehe Sopredniece cus ies wie IS eee! RRS ee 14
Xvi CLASSIFICATION.
CORPORATIONS — MUNICIPAL.
Presentation of claim — Cities — Continued.
BrOGKI YD gi esre eae wiser eats ai aye arg ie ese aie BU Reels Sas I4I
Brel On ciis ce sce fae le ecar’s tose toh da aioe arece de aes eitend Oke al one 142
ING W VORRS see giok y ieee een ea eethleie aunts ac 142
WG LASS 116 Wyss cscas a sc ccaithsonera tard sasu lw tnasacceleveieun avg ae foils 143
WANA SOS geese cece as sesh yok keane oo uase ald iaiig: eid avs aya wie! eae tiacapn 143
Sewers and drains..........cccce scence ce vercnces ioteneisteiwes 143
DISCHATGE cc ci. ease etiea sO e kee h Oda eRe eG ee 143
SOG: DaG hese cos sis -csceteuteiase sue teh aces Sad ape ae Seog Maes Ree whee BE: 9 144
Unclassified....... Suds acca suche wal aoe saa lays Eg owe eR RRS ae 146
WAGE Ie oc cts co asciai aac apm he Osa State aude Wise sun Rly eae 147
Unclassified. cust eke os ei aei ew eee RSS A ETE E Oe wea 147
CORPORATIONS — PRIVAT Biiss ccccvcncceeenieevescaess 148
COmpany....cce seer ewe war an de Rica nears bie ile ente swiss a 148
Filing ‘Certificates ea i sae na eniea on aie ee aie ca we le aia be We wa 148
Unclassified ons neces eee aes. a ated ae she dia aie penne aps 148
DILCCtOlS inane eo awe osW aa RE an GE AGE LS eas Ae Sa DGS we 149
Annual PEPOLts ss: secs see aa giersien wereus See eae, Sess bee Si 149
Bains ssturcrosacale srecate menace: discceersve ain Foreucents 393
PedestrraiStsia2s) os2egioetaese seacaactaaterta raeterate 394
Hills and embankments.............0cce cece aes 394
DA AVL GS ic saxerava ee mocsolevaeqpecene ict auah-ls armbar ieke aialleowians 394
Smoke............ Sechibseasaetaahcnabamave intel user tiassaereats sd oates 395
TYEAV AIS. Ss eave scate asaty aierten chiens aa necaeamaunes ae 395
POC Strt ans s setae: iscstieraler anas araverdareevher toler sre Rare, gs 395
PDA Ke AN CAME saveseessdselo.dousives to aveise so G6 ashes vasac tol tuveas ede 395
TVG U Mi Or asec alba sss aped naval snese sale keg ata eusoudecoetwve tne 395
Uniclassiiie ds pic jc ct ises nasi Sposa Soyo renaralaleses Slaed weno sie 396
TUT IV ANS cot tent tciedeacahodidt at beataas aig ay teal g Gaxcens 396
PeGestrrvarstscetc apek stings divies veel suslaue, be assent ase soiacaneione 397
Train across CrOSSING... cee cece cece cece cece eeen cece 397
ELAM FUSE Passed isc weiss cee cos eksGe eielacn sad ediane'dnd. aie oe ane 398
DY vin Gisdie sim sees ate Simeone: aim, We Ale esis ace ere. aiel one. ono Se 398
POGeStrta mses cx « xian sada etaiesedia Ades /8 ave dunia wes dace 399
AGU) tSisccnrse cadnavun wears eal oc dees 399
Tinta tS \erceaniaieete antes: eos nea are wie aera eleas 400
Usual flag*man awayies serve csee rvs dae we tees eee He 4ol
UNClASSINEd wsscciciote: ge aie Meee we Hee N Rae REE 4O1
DTV cs chive bes eeweeree a ai shehiFabs chines RES whe A 4o1
PSGESECLA IIS eo: cx sean caiine Seamartiske Cowra ies tee aware 404
PACU ES yet. & srcitlea si ad atta tora ralcdon eA ere Ae orden 6 404
Ifa tS aicos | ca tera Gueewe oo cian iets oe assets 404
WiC lassie aia esa op oaiinca uararsanea exe agee-meaeam nei 405
RUM OVERS OM TAC ise ara cuiie saree are ae aencde ae Soa yeitats cites enue anes ate 406
SAV TT Se LUE gs sss idse pacity w svshin gn alietior narod anh caushonesseve ul Saweeiue. a 406
Unloading at switch track......... M aaitee ener se aiesieanerst 406
WOFKING OD ATACK yias.o ares te oar dares ine ale diate @romdwerneree os 407
UnClassified 3). bios sees era cee Sarsmaeeree aovese -. 408
A UTES cere: ese: aw ave oie wee elas oie eights ates Weta aeaieeens 408
TAPRATTES So ree areata ge cry cade aveite Savenleve:ceetveter edenaand meer wenreetiens 406
"Tet hit DIES isis ess. secite: sr'gicrars ow pisos deat ties Se oeevlareesuiewe wae hee ew 410
UIMGIASSIA SG sss poco cosas sies sis: pcs Sar stn, eran Sie) aoe eees SOs Fle HSI aves Sit eS wie alae 413
With DiC ClOS: ste: tin ucaraes caseriayh serps, aie aasiaase wverapeiaie wis suman 413
With carriages Or WAQONS....... ce eee e eee enone 413
CTOSSING RACK. <.2:s,cuceannsianeisaiGrein Ge wig dik: ers Mlashensle oe 413
Driving on track... ..... cece ee rece res ieisrecoie i eee 419
Horses frightened... 0 6 scence cence cena renees 418
Unclassified.......... lel aia BG Sis a? aldo Gc ohana sige alter 419
xxvi CLASSIFICATION.
RAILROADS — STREET — Continued.
RUM OVETS sce seco cin sie cecar ike ace SE BES SSI SENT SE TW Gls Se aL Rae Se 42T
Ast -Cross-Wal ky. sicce seca ais owe 80m Wee A Hew) oes 8 er oer ee os 421
AUIS): casa caaad soar cn eu korea OW Rue Meee oa see 421
Infants ass osnenewes ee nese aces Sa ea ee alee 422
In road Way vas aan dads om ce re niin ea nee sews sleet wee es 422
AGUS sats a anes shoes wamenens Sires Ug aVas Ose ake anata ces 422
Infants........ Ssay cay ba Sap sarc aap ig age hd eb egah asanie wd eee adores 423
Brightened NOSES stsicsne enone sre cie ice ete ow eld ee se OS 426
WOEKING 101 SURE CBs s1c:o ei-cee- erences eh edere ei'ecaneray ovensiae sone $e eno 426
UN CLASSIM EG sisi ices abc cte, sre, 0igi clare a) alaieie dine io/esrererelae el Saale 427
PALES cc aeyecs eis cae cite rag aus ate ode Sse ataee asinine 2K Ble ueis Sasians 427
TREATIES gales sige la. ss oar ipy Wa ava ia acavawal a Hkeve cna dus sei's-ous estes 429
WPOLASS TE GS sc ccsseviesap 4 0isp io eevee senior a seilese va swea! 6 a) Seb Ja auiieielene Seppe 2 Ue ener 432
SPORTS: AND. GAMES... ecaecaiesienesie ee ard ese aes eee eee 434
‘ (OAS CIO sive ica savas ccerotw: wSevigsavs es 8: be eaante Anwiaud on ousta 6 Gastare is SORT 434
Pir@armSicsccce asks KeeGte ha SAMS eRe Sees RES Fe a MES 434
Fireworks). .ccacscuaaeses Se ee ee ee 434.
Unclassified ..ac cacaweesaas eraser eves iewn en Aedes 435
TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANIES Steeia ee ceeds 435
MESSAGES. 0s tea 6 sae oa SNe ER ORS NN Ew IS EN BUSES Oe eS 435.
Delaysincawe sv aanw seawen snes SSA SGNG ater ene oeprie ete eeeaiene 435
PXTTOMS oo success shui gansta aeieue sig ee Atey aielle ors ake abe nee eRe eae 435
Not delivered...... LGig at elas eeeGres = ahaa are epiae Wenee dee 436
WHTCIASSIGISG sas weno wisgis, avorcatelaces ssa sesiaiarsyanvcapleoa atarie ae aiicey sane 437
Mt GLASSUEG ' siviccice cage keine lohe oie ete 5H obeaAN Whleiwh a eG caine Gees ates aioe 437
VEHICU BS. coins vabuaiweveues Seb ychoam cei Oi aa pike iew 437
OVS TOT Ss g ae aratey snare $e canaiigta ere 55) SN ee Riga on Sw res ak Sie eos 437
With: DIC YCIES fev rere: cnn yaw arg acahe os Baers Abe ute aie ecece wees 437
With carriages or wagons............. wiabajs ela Oieeeaiekers 438
Horses running away.......s.sseeeeeee suede Gre aie 438
SPO@lal: VEMICLES sa sesate-Sscsensinversna aves nsareumysievoias-elalebe i018 438
Unclassified........ ule ayese ubctvn oaths Satan, Sun stn lose adiue cepts A439
With: Street: Cars ecatis-aiccccscnekg.as bse Woe iwee: oe -aodiavw avi lose vane ibs 441
Run OVESS. 20 acct nen’ saan eas 8 ud na sepia fig! Boo end Bie Hani bry 441
Alighting from street Cars...... ...... gj Wibiere le wie saa avawe 441
Atcross- walk: ciaeca sas wiemwelscie ccsmsncvee as wae serene e 442
INGUItS Sie ence eee ap seo eta eee ae ORR HERR RRS 442
TLHPANtS 6 ais. alee cl does sian AGW ERE, WW RE Sa Bes SON TTT 443
HORSES FUNHING AWAY, 6b snewnacane ness ae wee eae om eR Te 443
TN POAC WAY oe rehia cia -ssie casceve aun sce ais,
GOS identi sns- gH cotanavrde wis ctacanteas 187
PAGE
Albert v. Albany Ry. Co........ 431
Albert v. Bleecker St. Ry. Co., 419
Albert v. D. & H.C. Co........ 390:
Albert v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Re Cui wade Wie uaival otis wees 260
Albert v. Sweet..............0. 316.
Alberti v. N. Y., L, E. & W. R.
Ree Cons aa eindon sees nema eu 70
Alberts v. Bache............... 282
Albrecht v. County of Queens, 174.
Alden v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co..... 50
Aldrich v. Sager............... 31
Aldridge v. Clausen............ 451
Alexander v. Cauldwell........ 155.
Alexander v. Greene...:....... 454
Alexander v. Rochester City &
By Re Ri COs esse $0.8 658 sen itn a 70:
Allen v. Albany Ry............ 323.
Allen v. Atlantic & P. Tel. Co.. 181
Allen v. Banks. ..............0. 353
Allen v. B. R. & P. R. R. Co.. 192
Allen’ viv Glarke: occ. dacsccae o's ate 156:
Allen v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B.
Ro WRY COs scat dele veare 4-o4 mate
Allen v. Fourth Nat. Bank..... II
Allen v. McConihe............ 342
Allen v. Merchants’ Bank...... 29
Allen v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R.
GOs agin e arse eee eoese ed 388
Allen v. Sackrider
Allen v. Sewall..............005
Allen v. State S. S. Co
Allen v. Suydam...............
Allen v. Williamsburgh Sav.
Bathe wagidvde ca tie tesnmasiaces 13
Allison v. Village of Middle-
TOW caonawwe ie owe dem awaas ee wa 221
Alperin v. Earle................ 247°
Althorf v. Wolfe............... 182
American Bk. N. Co. v. N. Y.
Elevated R. R. Co........... 330°
American C. Ins. Co. v. Hag-
CULV wees we enwe Oa ed OR RwRS BES 341
American Preservers Co. v.
DFESCHEP coiuec tae. oh uetaneens 6 17
Amerman v. Deane............ 340
Ames v. Belden................ 17
Ames v. Broadway & S. A. R
Re EO: akcreactaaas area Ws ante intonidene 424
[xxix]
XXX TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Amory v. McGregor.....+..--- 124
Anchor Brewing Co. v. WORE
of Dobbs Ferry ee
Andersen v. N. Y. & Cuba M. S.
S. CO saseguies cent cwmianaess 293
Anderson v. Dickie............ 208
Anderson v. Boyer.. 249
Anderson v. Meatanren EL. Ry.
COs siasasrtresesntraun guise meanae hE 181
Anderson v. N. J. S. B. Co.... 320
Anderson v. N. Y. & Cuba Mail
S; Sb Cosas anedewaeess c's 318
Anderson v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
R. R. Co...... se aieesensesetone eed 386
Anderson v. Parks..........-.-
Anderson v. Rochester, L. & N.
BF. Ro Re Cote saan daeaae ss 6 B33
Anderson v. R., W. & O. R. R.
Anderson v. Speers.........+-- 154
Anderson v. Standard G. L. Co., 161
Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R.
GO. eetewwerecvasaacadeune’s 432
Andrews v. Murray............ 159
Andrews v. Richmond......... 23
Annett v. Foster............... 452
Anselment v. Daniell.......... 447
Ansteth v. Buffalo Ry. Co..... as
Anthony v. Leeret............. 291
Anthony v. Village of Glens
Heal Ses cscecsssraseneaieaceuhah ceases snes uses 221
Appel v. B., N. Y. & P. RR.
GOs is ai ceacis echiert ccdendasrnt agunwaKen 262
Appleby v. Erie Co. Sav. Bank, 13
Appleton v. Welch............. 22
Archer v. McDonald........... 23
Archer v. N. Y., N.H. & H.R.
79
Archer v. Sixth Ave. R. a Co., 94
Archibald v. N. Y. C. _R
Rs. Ri ©Oswisansacasevesevacs 376
Arctic F. Ins. Co. v. Austin.... 123
Arend v. Liverpool, N. Y. & P.
SiS CO mia nancies da erwragenaren 122
Arent v. Squiire.............0.5 24
Argall v. Bryant.............. 32
Armbruster v. Auburn G. L.
Cos. saxetvinaeanaex ceeesner aes 161
Armstrong v. Mettopolitan St.
Rs AC Oi wxsemsietn ia th aaereacg roc’
Armstrong v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
RG sa aaciainien tie tiog annexin ormsanens
bse ed ae ss tect eae 418
dened D, & HG 6. asics 260
Arnold v. Halenbake........... 117
Arthur v. City of Cohoes...... 434
Arthur v. Village of Glens Falls, 143
Artis v. B., R. & P. R. R. Co., 262
Ashberry v. Town of West
Seneca: viseacaneneraaie vee | 228
PAGE
Ashley v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 179
Atkins v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 54
Atkinson v. Abraham.......... 241
Atkinson v. Oelsner............ 442
Atlantic & P. T. Co. v. Western
RADY AC Oe ccsatacs M zeiayeeeam anche 437
Atlantic Dock Co. v. City of
Brookl9n: cigs viccsniis bers 133
Atlantic Dock Co. v. Mayor,
etc., of New York............ 133
Atlantic M. Ins. Co. v. Mc-
LOOM csp cana aya daw winaiowats 125
Attorney-General v. Cohoes
CO: sascha aieiee aeeat enn nea’ 335
Attorney-General v. Conti-
nental L. Ins. Co............ 10
Atwater v. Lowe.............. 2
Atwater v. Town of Veteran... 190
Atwater v. Trustees of Canan- °
ANG UA oscepsiave uss cade sadcndsi nad iter 462
Auburn Sav. Bank v. Brinker-
HOF wesc suwiwn wewrdaeaceimen aun 344
Auchmuty v. Ham............. 3
Auerbach v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
RoR: COs ox cameae rei aawe 63
August v. Fourth Nat. Bank... 12
Austin v. H. R. R. R. Co....... : 350
Austin v. Long Island R. R.
COy-ceisigierk sa neememedeeees 397
Austin v. N. J. S. B. Co..... 58, 453
Austin v. Staten Island R. T.
GO» crnsaee knneaguetamiaien sass 406
Avery v. City of Syracuse...... 211
Avery v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Rs €Onsnidaeesewuawene riaers 325
Avery v. State of New York... 322
Axlebrood v. Rosen............ 44t
Ayers v. Russell............... 370
Aymar y. Beers.......-...-.005 27
Ayrault v. Chamberlain......... 366
Ayrault v. Pacific Bank........ 29
Ayres v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 82
Ayres v. Village of Hammonds-
DOLL. eauccknwsanninesns a Beene 221
Ayres v. Western R. R. Co..... 115
B
Babbage v. Powers............ - 208
Babcock v. City of Buffalo..... 339
Babcock v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 383
Babcock v. Gifford............ 197
eens v. LL. S. & M.S. Ry.
sl dea Macvauieasion Ska aout suas naead 130
Babcock v. Mayor, etc., of New
divas ecole Mirek wie te aslab maneias 217
Babeock v. N. Y¥. C. & H.R.
Ris Ris! CO ina caannte ne cunniiaaiie ae os
Bacon v. Cropsey..............
Bagley v. Consolidated Gas Co., oe
Bahrenburgh vy. Brooklyn City
R. R. Co
Poe ee meee meee rene nes
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Bailey v. Jourdan.............. 388
Bailey v. Mayor, etc., of New
OTIS “wasiosagecoupo havens aavennanes 458
Bailey v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 2
Baird v. Daly ioiagte sees mnaiiies 454
Baird v. Gillett................ 368
Baird v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
FRE GO raercs cahinacaitae sans rocaparoteiasn & 25
Baird v. Richardson........... 306
Bajus v. S., B. & N. Y. R. R.
EG os aed eaten rcanan p iaere deyortoaterbee 261
Baker v. Broadway & S. A. R.
Re Ones serine dead Weantend's 88
Baker v. Byrne...........-...- 455
Baker v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 424
Baker v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 68
Baker v. Pope............-..5- 31
Baker v. Rachester City R. R.
COs. Sea ip sty ediseeceate aancnegpuuoeneae 423
Baker v. Savage............... 442
Baker v. Sutton................ 270
Baker v. Village of Oneonta... 228
Baldwin v. City of Oswego.... 135
Baldwin v. Jenkins............ 214
Baldwin v. Liverpool & G. W.
Ds CO sas cagninn cee cama ey 4 112
GOs, sake esac te wane ahayaceuine teins
Baldwin v. oe Ss. oe Co., 435
Ball v. N. J. S CO adage
Ballard v. Pee Mfg. Co., ae
Ballou v. State of New York... 146
Banfield v. Haeger............. 2
Bank of B. N. A. v. Merchants’
Banke js ovoutesvsi's vate dgsraten axe 12
Bank of Commerce v. Union
Bank’ « .cpcadiee nec smi os8 26
Bank of Meadville v. Fourth
Nat. (Dia tt vrs eice enous aie 27
Bank of Metropolis v. Faber.... 157
Bank of Orleans v. Smith...... 30
Bank of Oswego v. Doyle...... 112
Bank of Rome v. Mott......... 136
Bank of S. N. v. Fenton....... 155
Bank of Troy v. Bank of the
Capitol. cecninccega sewers sd eels 29 .
Bank of Utica v. Childs........ 28
Bank of Utica v. McKinster... 29
Banks v. Wilkes............0-+ 162
Barber v. Abendroth Bros..... 468
Barber v. Harrison............ 19
Barber v. Town of New Scot-
Tatid: trpesece ee cues henge eeaees 463
Barclay v. Clyde............05: 125
Bard v. N. Y. & H.R. R. Co... 360
Barker v. Coflin............... 65
Barker v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.. 6i
Barker v.-Paulson............65 227
Barkley v. Wilcox..........56+ 363
Barlow v. McDonald..... Atosists 8
Barnard v. Darling............ 136
XXX]
PAGE
Barnes v. City of Brooklyn.... 141
Barnes v. Cole..........eees eee 451
Barnes v. Keene.........e0005 350
Barnett v. Taylor.............- 208
Barney v. Burstenbinder....... 131
Barney v. Oyster Bay & A. S.
Se CO ringtone Se cacaptuemnjartenuewans 94
Barrack v. Schifferdecker...... 337
Barrett v. Singer Mfg. Co...... 232
Barrett v. Smith............... 445
Barrett v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 57
Barrett.v. Town of Walworth... 186
Barringer v. D. & H.C. Co..
Barringer v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
RR G6e eis ci iatiieioken si 305
Barron v. Richard............. 330
Barry v. Crimmins............ 283
Barry v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
RR. COssacve vas oraeraeenay ees he 410
Barry v. Second Ave. R. R. as » 431
Bartholomew v. N. Y. C. & H
Bartholomew v. Poughkeepsie
& H. F. Co
Bartlett v. Crozier............. 168
Bartlett v. McNeil............. 321
Bartlett v. N.Y. & S. BF. &
S.. Trans: Coy eis. ae0ese cree 34
Bartlett v. Village of Tarrytown, 177
Barto v. Stephan..............
Barton v. City of Syracuse..... a6
Barton v. Govan..........e 008 309
Barton v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Re CO ascaascciewatys jes evden iat Hin ety 407
Bassett v. Fish...........-.00: 354
Bassett v. Lederer............. 324
Bastable v. Ge of Syracuse.... 227
Bateman v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Re ICG eruitanee amanda tea aretions 8t
Bateman v. Ruth.............. 194
Bates v. N. ¥.C.& H.R. RR.
CO, denis cca tated ceoeein 389
Bates v. Underhill............. 162
Bates v. White....... cated cana 131
Battersby v. Mayor, etc., of New
Vor’. veswswmraae viens 24 buses 189
Bauer v. City of Rochester..... 197
Bauer v. Lyons...........0.005 3
Baer N.Y, L. E. & W.R.
Re “COlpwiingen seein a secin ealemee
Baulec v. N. Y. eH. R. R. Co., ee
Baumann v. Gilmour........... 449
Baumann v. Metropolitan St. ne
CO so cesdieani aes Kenn aaniens.4 48
Baxter v. Richardson.......... 267
Baxter v. Second Ave. R. R.
GOy ai Arion aaamainudaleay ten 42
Baxter v. Troy & B. R. R. Co.. 305
Baxter v. Warner.. : .. 195
Baylis v. Schwalbach Cycle Co., a6
Beach v. Bay State S. S. Co...
XXXII
PAGE
Beach v. City of Elmira........ 144
Béach: V.. (Graittwsx cacy emu wae 2
Beach v. Raritan & D. B. R. R.
COe shes aciecoibieged eves Hae ae nO 17
Beale v. Parrish............... 29
Beardslee v. Richardson....... 16
Beardsley v. Warner........... 344
Beatty v. Hessman...........45 309
Beatty v. Thilemann........... 185
Beaudin v. Central Vt. R. R.
GOs. aevrttss ena arens Weoamiaetanens 259
Becht v. Corbin..............6. 3890
Beck vi Gattetivessc cesnweswea ws 214
Beck v. East River Ferry Co.. 452
Becker v. Barnum.............. 31
Becker v. Janinski............. 368
Becker v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
Ris (GC Oiges seb ieid ceramapac sin acy noe leh dee tae 375
Becker v. Warner.. reorxacae 19
Beckwith v. Griswold.......... 461
Beckwith v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
Re OR5) COs smsietucis tie maanropeatens 401
Beckwith v. Oatman........... 307
Beckwith v. Smith............. 138
Bedell v.. Kirkivcciscccyagsewaes
455
Bedell v. Long Island R. R. Co., 382
Bedell v. Village of Sea Cliff... 228
Bedford v. Tupper............. 139
Beebe v. Ayers.............0-. 62
Beekman v. Van Dolsen....... 247
Beers vy. Walhizer.............. 32
Behrman v. Linde............. 24
Beilfus v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
Re ORs COs asnccnng auc chiara neers 277
Beir ve Codk@ ees sccsos vrugedicn 339
Beisiegel v. N. Y. C. R. eS Oo 399
Belch v. N. Y. C. & H.
Belcher v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. e
Belford v. Canada Shipping Co., 292
Belger v. Dinsmore........... 106
Belknap v. Trimble............ 407
Bell v. City of Rochester...... 465
Bell Ve DPC Wee cancauieeatsnancens IOl
Bellv. N. Y.C. & H.R. RR.
GOs: Ssovdancssche ss aeilanee pene tayalno as 302
Bellinger v. Craigue........... 369
Bellinger v. N. Y. ¢. R. R. Co., 461
Bellman v' N. Y.T. & H R.
Re IRs NB Oia a tatersarsul crew tcdpeieesvinte nid 38
Bas v. Metropolitan St. Ry.
sdshaviogovetias th sana cateelorstisong eas iets 425
ellowa Vi, Sacketts.ssccscenene ds 62
Belton v. Baxter............... 442
Beltz v. City of Yonkers....... 223
Bendetson v. French........... 19
Benedict v. Martin............ 352
Benedict v. N. Y. & H. R. R.
Re CO ind ates hes ciate nua eben bie
Benedict v. Scheider...........
305
Benedict v. State of New York.. 459
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Benfield v. Vacuum Oil Co.... 275
Benner v. Atlantic Dredging
COs svaiaieendaneedss aueeenee 28
Benner v. Jordan..............
Bennett v. Brooklyn Heights R.
Re SCO iaioncey vain evnwloe acta chive ears 431
Bennett v..Cook............... 163
Bennett v. Greenwich & J. Ry.
Cop atiageswriaada aren den as 260
Bene v. Long Island R. ey
R. Co.. ssiahangseuisbsacsateida ay lotee Goa tee tus 392
Bennett v. Village of aig Sing., 226.
Bennett v. Western U. T. Co.. 436
Bennett v. Whitney............ 187
Benoit v. Troy & L. R. R. Co.. 426
Benson v. Suarez.............. 352
Benthin v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
Rothe. (COs es sccowacnana nd ate avenvece 302
Bentley v. Phelps.............. 140
Benzing v. Steinway & Sons...
Berg v. Narragansett S. S. Co., 100:
Berg v. Parsons............... 348
Berg v. et Foster Mining Co., 272°
Bergen v. N. Y. & Harlem R.
Ri CO sista china ives oargie eistnats
Berke v. Twenty-third St. Ry.
GOs snes acaenretaeeenn 417
Berley v. Newton.............. 8:
Bernardi v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
RETRY AGO ta acon rane atense hd tocse nao 275
Bernhard v. Rochester Ry. Co., 414
Bernhardt v. Rensselaer & S. R.
IRE IC Oe goats Mase wiaraeemuiiatconees 78.
Bernheimer v. Spee Rete 359
Bernstein v. Dry Dock, B.
& B. Sy Rs Ry COsiax: eeaieac 41
Bernstein v. Seo ee ee 18.
Berrigan v. N. Y., L. E. & W
TRE AR SO Oh uiecahecrachane aopanedutaeunn 263.
Bertholf v. O’Reilly........... 31
Berzevizy v.D., L.& W.R.R..
(GOs. aun nese arate cinch ave Wee 381
Besel v. N. Y.C & HR R.
FRE, SOO stort Gys mu gia etiaee danse 311
Betts v. Village of Gloversville, fa5
Betzki v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.... 392
Bevier v. D. & H.C. Co....... 382
Bidelman, as supervisor, v. State
of New York............. 174, 457
Bidwell v. Town of Murray..... I7I
Bieling v. City of Brooklyn....
Bierbaur v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Re CO shes cus cs sesesanaue, acteaceave' 203
Billings v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 383.
Bills v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co...... Ito
Bird v. Everard................ 2
Bird v. Long Island R. R. Co.. 263:
178.
TABLE OF CASES CITED. XXxili
PAGE PAGE
Birdsall v. Tiemann............ 339 | Blunt v. Aikinw.............00. 460
Birdsell v. Russell............. 30 | Blunt v. Barrett.............04 24
Birkett v. Knickerbocker Ice Blunt v. Hay.. ti vexaans 331
COs vast ssntexesancwiweetenea 443 | Blunt v. McCormick. .......... 335
Birmingham v. Rochester City Bly v. Village of Whitehall..... 215
By RE Re Oh cig aciewiceeas 71 | Board of Health v. Casey...... 405
Birnbaum v, Lord.............. 449 | Board of Health v. Valentine... 339
Bisbee v. Mansfield............ 331 | Boardman v. Brown........... 286
Bischoff v. Schulz.............. 17 | Boecher v. Lutz............... 7
Bishop v. Barton.............. 172 | Boehm v. Mace..............4 2607
Bishop v. Village of Goshen.... 221 | Boehncke v. Brooklyn City R.
Bishop v. Mayor, etc., of New R: COs esaieragsnaaedseeslceaas 53
OTIS ce, pavbinacuen dem enur nose torasiaeirs 229 | Boess v. Clausen & P. B. Co... 268
Bissel v. Campbell............. 13t | Bogart v. D., L. & W. R. R.
Bissel v. Torrey.............05 454 CO’. ors eis waieoaalatdeng tad dareienas 250
Bissell v. M. S. & N. IL RR. Bohan v. Port Jervis G. L. Co., 336
Companies: 0. ae vicesien «wieveus 55 | Bohn v. Havemeyer............ 203
Bissell v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. Bold v. O’Brien............... 239
Fassia tote dnt viund ea vet 73} Boldt v. Murray............... 309
Bittner v. Crosstown Ry. Co... 425 | Boldt v. N.Y. C. R. R. Co..... 313
rae v. Brooklyn City R. R. Boll v. Adirondack R. R. Co... 403
hele vec escapade thet asx nos eines 51 Bolster v. Mayor, etc., of New
Black v. Camden & A. R. R. MEG KG a teste apes oh eume ser toaavaranenst 142
scat ea oars tier a i tana caree a 121 | Bolton v. Village of New
Black v. Forty-second St. R. Rochelle: cccunwense vevers acs 44
ei Geek @ ues aN Ga aerate 426 | Bomboy v. N. Y. C.& H. R.R.
Wack. Maitland fon aloenstromeennass 350 IR AGO) 255s cps subnvndgyanteyesane Ss dsteosn heave 395
Black v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 85 | Bondv.N. Y.C.& H.R. RR.
Black River Bank v. Page..... 344 COs saicis sha couserchapslonais ini tnamed enti 301
Blackstock v. N. Y. & Erie R. M. Bond v. Smith.. se 1 200
Re 2G cancameces cates inaaneeters 108 | W. L. Bond v. Smith.......... 305
Blackwell v. Wiswall........... 89 | Boniface v. Relyea............. 8
Blaechinska v. Howard Mission, 209 | Bonnell v. Griswold............ 153
Blair v. Bartlett................ 368 | Bonnell v. Jewett.............. 273
Blair v. Erie Ry. Co........... 73 | Bonnell v. Wheeler............ 154
Blaiser v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. Bonsteel v. Vanderbilt......... 61
Ri CO nana ain comnnungcaeen cove 405 | Boom v. City of Utica......... 339
Blake v. Ferris...........00055 194 | Boom v. Reed................. 370
Blake v. Fox..........000000e- 239 | Boone v. Citizens’ Sav. Bank... 13
Blakeley v. City of Troy........ 218 | Boothv. B.& A. R.R.Co..... 256
Blanchard v. Isaacs............ 122 | Boothv. R.. W. & O. R.R. Co., 349
Blanchard v. N. J. S. B. Co.... 453 | Bordeaux v. Erie Ry. Co....... 62
Blanchard v. Western Union T. Borden v. D, L. & W. R. R.
DOs scsi ec ic su ssc eatieen Seg tunes tabi 464 COs gag cx eeuehcaeveaie sarees deasneegeee 321
Blate v. Third Ave. R. R. Co... 420 | Borgeson v. U. S. Projectile
Blatz v. Rohrbach............. 32 COs. Zanoyatonhseniteaguccnini equate 306
Blaustein v. Guindon.......... 182 | Borst v. L. S. & M.S. Ey i 388
Blauvelt, Matter of............. 164 | Bossout v. R., W. & O.
Bleyle v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.... 393 COs rarask 2 oh Be aeaenld eerie i 412
Blin v. Campbell............... 434 Boston & P. D. E. Co. v. Metro-
Bliss v. Schaub................ 195 politan St. Ry. Co........... 416
Bliven v. H. R. R. R. Co...... 118 | Bostwick v. B. & O. R. R. Co.. 124
Block v. Harlem B, & M. R. R. Bostwick v. Barlow............ 169
CO). -scedscussnansate tn manatees 424 | Bostwick v. Champion......... 58
Blodgett v. City of Syracuse... 133 | Boswell v. H. R. R. R. Co..... 73
Bloom v. National U. B. & Te. Bosworth v. Standard Oil Co.. 355
CG sce tires oe eoesateanecdtageve pans 160 | Botsford v. Dodge............. ISI
Bloomer v. Morss..........-.- 464 | Bouker v. Long Island R. R.
Blossom v. Dodd.............. 102 COe cisaani'n site asntehnadiocsnwins III
Blossom v. Griffin............. 115 Boughton V:, OliSisewewes sven 152
Blue: vi. Blast. os caccceesaaades 443 ' Bowen v. City of Rome........ 193
XXXIV
PAGE
Bowen v. State of New York... 172
Bowles v. R.. W. & O. R. R.
GO. maaan eerie nos 56
Bowman v. Ta MIA a coricce came 366
Bowman v. Teall................ 125
Bowman v. Troy & B. R. R.
GG), acasanesens eneanenl awed 344% 371
Bowyer v. Burlew............-- 7
Boyce v. H. R. R. Go.......... 3
Boyce v. Manhattan Ry, Co.... 82
Boylan v. Brown............... 409
Boyland v. Mayor, etc., of New
MOURS aa nagecaucsaelsmgrare weyeaeace ties 178
Boyle v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
Ri MG Oe saisieioas ena toaseinensaedynacrneie ae) 376
Brace v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Re COwsvaares nan eteenteneee ss 373
Bradford v. Self.. 441
Bradley v. Buffalo, N. ¥ & E,
Re Re (CG ese bs sycauanennsea ne 373
ee N.Y.C.&H. RR.
‘settee cig hae treads iioncdn ee 248
Bradley. vi Peoplevscsssencavass 337
ae v. Second Ave R. R.
Bradshaw v. R., W. & Os. R. R.
Co, . 381
Bradt + v. . City of Albany... osx 143
Brady v. Little Miami R. R. Co., 27
Brady v. Manhattan Ry. Co... 83
Brady v. Rensselaer & S. R. R.
COs gapad eorex aunaceayctetesne' 375
Brady v. Valentine............. 245
Brady v. Weeks................ 331
a eas v. Harlem Lighting
ree betshacia ragmpavenetiyie ahd a ete 339
Ried v. Schenectady & T. R.
Re GOt re sedate mimonennian 408
Brandt v. N. J. S. B. Co....... 117
Brassell v. N. Y.C. & H. R.R.
Re CO er weenie gaumincnnat Se 38
Breen v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
RRC Oass. aca aeacan thal tal piaaverw areoaake 70
Breese v. U. S. Telegraph Co... 436
Brehm v. oe Western Ry.
CO ee ays gectetes MBS esantetenscn 2.0. coed aos 59
Breil v. City of Buffai scisat echoing 198
Bremiller v. B., R. & P. R. R.
CO es sateen ere erehd eect raedentn ailescck crt 79
Brennan v. Brooklyn Heights
Ra RC Oi aucive tam anciaree arora 77
Brennan v. Ellis............... 240
Brennan v. Gordon............ 268
_ Brennan v. Lachet.. niavecn AG
Brennan v. Mayor, etc., of New
York Xavi destinies Dyed toyaeten sas dsovogec ars is
Bresky v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., at
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Brewer v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
IRE ACG anne ceca icstactcia eo atdatuaneses 73
Briant v. Trimmer............. 439
Brice v. Bauer...........0euee 5
Brice v. Flagler....../.........
Brick v. Rochester, N. Y. & P.
Ri Re, CG Sie.o53 eaciacannespastvanante nied ost 266
Brickell v. N. Y. C.& H. R.R.
Ris CO au sgaiaitennitecreasieiarsaey 387
Brickner v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 206
Briggs v. Easterly. . 153
Briggs v. N. Y. C. &HRR
IR CO iseserideeueeceescias aes ouninaan in 384, 463
Briggs v. N. ¥.C. R. R. Co.... 110
Briggs v. Vanderbilt........... 61
Brignoli v. Chicago R. R. Co.. 59
Brinckhard v. Western Union
TiO dS, © Oiaytcars sd i esetcnenare teddies 178
Brinkerhoff v. Bostwick........ 158
Brinkman v. Eisler............ 327
pe v. Rensselaer & S. R. R.
ds endvannce amram cman 112
Britt v. Alexandre............. 293
Brockway v. Lascala.. 34
Bronk vy. B. & A. R. R. Co.. | 385
Bronk v. N. Y. & N. H.R. R,
COD aeaikase a Renna oh ben inn 387
Bronson v. Dimock..... say bs 2 154
Bronson v, Fitzhugh........... 139
Bronson v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
R: Rs. €Ges.05¢ cenanraaverenrs 403
Brookfield v. Remsen.......... 138
Brookmire v. Monogham...... 32
Brooks v. American Exp. Co.. 103
Brooks v. Buffalo & N. F. R. R.
CO} czauuea yy as meaner ee tens 385
Brooks v. Dinsmore........... 106
Brooks v. Kings Co. El. R. R.
CO, ararentcsaassctore acetone alata pob Hates hasan 181
Brooks v. Lawrence........... 130
Brooks v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co... 371
Brooks v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
IRE AC Oe Sisen pecatuepamv neat ue anedatalaive 80
Brooks v. Schwerin............ 442
Brophy v. Bartlett............. 234
Broughton v. Whallon......... 323
Brower v. Mayor, etc., of New
AOE cs gusscaciuon acncnrecdandies uavabaniuerens 337
Brown v. Bowen..............5 461
Brown v. Broadway R. R. Co.. 423
Eun Buffalo & S.L. R. R.
siigihiasuta toa vet seis 2 auc eeaesib Bu 386
Brown v. Buffalo, R. & P. R, R.
SOs. ini site ais aranansoailiseade aeapteckehey 384
Brown v. Cayuga & S. R. R.
COs statennee v-ameeenpid ancien cnr ees 460
Brown v. City of Syracuse..... 216
Brown v. Clark.............005 156
Brown v. Cook.........-..0004 16
Brown v. Corbin............... 381
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Brown v. Elliott............... 361
Brown v. Foster............... 216
Brown v. Hoburger............ 6
Brown v. Maxwell............. 270
Browh v. Mohawk & H. R. R.
COs eastenin lh gh conennrrt ec cetecaresis 460
Brown v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Rix (OG sngn ad con teen asarscineseaiene 3
Brown v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co.... 56
Brown v. N. Y. Gas-light Co.. 161
Brown v. Peabody............. 113
Brown v. Purdy............... 368
Brown v. Ricketts............. 165
Brown v. R.,. W. & O. R. R.
GOs casvardirs RG Siie dese aie aeons 405
Brown v. Sharp.............00 411
Brown v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 57
Brown v. Twenty-third St. R.
Ry (COena sce saccomeieks saeesoes 427
Brown v. Woodworth.......... 460
Brown v. Wysong...........+- 216
Brownell v. Flagler............ 25
Browner v. Jones...........4.- 338
Browning v. Hanford.......... 136
Browning v. Long sland R. R.
GOL. chapel e Mave aa an romed venient 117
Bruce v. Platte............0000 me
Bruen v; Gillett: ccsavensse2cwes
Bruno v. Brooklyn City R. R.
COe dai caihdectad dcr eeuenas ae erat de
Brush v. Long Island R. R. Co., a
Brusso v. City of Buffalo....... 193
Bruswitz v. Nederlandische A.
Si Ni Coss: suastednensacevens 89
Bryan v. Landon............... 172
Bryant v. American T. Co..... 435
Bryant v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
R,, COwsicessepaxexaven sy edan 254
Bryant v. Town of Randolph... 205
Bryer v. Foerster...........+.. 207
Buchanan v. Smith............ 17
Bucher v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
R.. CO: xeccagae evucdtenaae ies 37
Bucher v. Pryibil.............. 209
Buck v. Barber................ 154
Buck v. Manhattan Ry. Co..33, 82
Buck vii MoOresas csc ccamenaa’s 4
Buck yv. Village of Glens Falls, 221
Buck v. Webb...............05 63
Buckingham v. Payne.......... 30
Buckley v. Clark............... 357
Buckley v. Gutta Percha & R
IM 5 MC Gai c tots Baad aaaedesatensraneraeetus 304
Buckley v. Leonard............ :
Buckley v. N. Y. & H.R. RR.
CO. eri bccrt rsa a ae ae oti 409
Buckley v. Port Henry Iron Ore
CO hd sven igirs dacettnanh deh conn ape cdraace 272
Buckman v. Green.....
Buddenberg v. Berner
Buddin v. Fortunato...........
XXXV
PAGE
Budlong v. Westcott........... 447
Buel v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co..... 55
Buffalo & H. Turnpike Co. v.
City of Buffalo............005 147
Buffalo Trust Co. v. Leonard... 327
Buffett v. Troy & B. R. R.Co.. 81
Buhrens v. Dry Dock, E. B. &
BR Re Ge wea nei advarhioctaent 413
Bulger v. Albany Ry. Co....... 423
Bullock v. Babcock............ 435
Bullock v. Mayor, etc., of New
York
Bullock v. Town of Durham... 173
Bundschuh v. Mayer........... 5
Bunn v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 405
Bunnell v. Stern............... 22
Co.
Burckle v. N. Y. Dry Dock Co., 468
Burdick v. Erie Ry. Co
Burdick v. Worrall
Burges v. Jackson.............
Burgess v. Sixth Ave. R. R.
COs ie oseace aun acinidensten sue taaeandis 419
Burgevin v. N. ¥. C. & H.R.
R. Co.. uae 95
mee D. esa CG Go. Sethe tars 380
Burk v. Edison G. E. Co.. 236
Burke v. Broadway & S. A. R.
Ry COR sinnstindlanan toe pea utente 424
Burke v. Brown............... 26)
Burke v. De Castro............ 469
Burke v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 179
Burkev. N. Y.C.& H.R. RR.
COs igiiias Garewal nneatents 389
Burke v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y.
RE Rs CO cgasaridinnunave tesseenene 255
Burke v. Witherbee............ 315
Burkhalter v. Second Nat.
Batile 5 ee. 2guctentaeaidale sini 27
Burmeister v. N. Y. Elevated R.
Rie Co ii cicccaccdomak peti awe 18)
Burnell v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co... rar
Burnes v. Staten Island R. T.
Ok, xajcgevcnas nan Tea ava oa ce Oot Arie 406
Burnham v. Butler............. 439
Burns v. Bostwick...........05 29t
Burns v. City of Schenectady... 225
Burns v. City of Yonkers....... 190
Burns vi Dilloniessssauasiaoeas 364
Burns v. Glens Falls, S. H. &
Re ESR. Rei Coase vee 65
Burns v. Matthews............. 271
Burns v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Rix |G Owsiudansuitiag x are Mecsas eee 400
Burns v. Pethcal.............. 238
Burns v. Second Ave, R. R, Co., 4
Burrell v. Preston............. 369
Burrows v. Erie Ry. Co........ 35
Burt v. Jewett.........cceeeeee 85
XXXV1 TABLE
PAGE
nae vy. Buffalo & S. L. R. R. 5
Aske dicta Acsincusceaprerpar ene 10!
Gnsah vy. Buffalo Creek R. R.
sg sand sec ta eis a cack SIAR ato 407
Busch v. N. Y.. L. E. & W.R
Re COsaaucekcey ardecise Seer 339
Bush v. Brainard..........+6-. 2
Busey: Millets asia cevusctswcawss 128
Bush ¥. Romer. :sccvesa seecees 113
Bush v. ee of Geneva.. 189
Bushby v. N. Y _LE &W.R.
Re 1G Ganaciie sm ckacauvehiycslaccaris 288
Bussman v. Western Transit
CO scsisitinas bes, Merooierereiecnaupsl ences ieee 94
Butcher v. Hyde ee eee 361
Butler, Matter of...........+... 164
Butler v. Cushing.............. 239
Butler v. Glens Falls, S. H. &
Ft. B.S. Re Re CO svesaeees 50
Butler v. H. R. R. R. Co....98, 100
Butler v. Kent.............+--- 159
Butler v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 47
Butler v. Murray.............6- 131
Butler v. Smalley.............. ISI
Agnes Butler v. Townsend..... 297
Annie Butler v. Townsend..... 355
Butler v. Village of Edgewater, 146
Butterfield v. Klaber........... 338
Butterworth v. Clarkson....... 205
Buttman v. Dennett...........
Button v. H. R. R. R. Co
Button v. Kinnetz......... ws
Butts v. Mackey Co............
Byrne v. City of Syracuse
Byrne v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 438
Byrne v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Re COs ascseaws peatauans aman 404
Byrnes v. City of Cohoes....... 226
Byrnes v. D. & H.C. Co....... 371
Byrnes v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R
Ris IG Oss diacetate Sap encrarcveneraeeeh ae 352
Byrnes v. Palmer..............
Byron v. N. Y. S. P. & Tel. Co.,
C
Cadwell v. Arnheim
Cadwell v. Murphy, aa
Cady’ v.. Sheldon swcascaes
Cagney v. Manhattan Ry. Co... 74
Cahalin v. Cochran............ 183
Cahill v. Hilton... ..0..068 cee 309
Cain v. City of Syracuse.. we 352
Cain v. Syracuse, B. & N. YR.
ARs COs aca nctv sareoi canine a 406
Caldwell v. Central P., G. S. &
Pe By Ry ORS COnariusecokaies 64
Caldwell v. Erie Transfer Co... 103
Caldwell v. Mohawk Bank..... 14
Caldwell v. N. J. S. B. Co...... 65
Caldwell v. Snook............. 5
OF CASES CITED.
PAGE.
Caldwell-Wilcox Co. v. Sullivan, 15
Calkins v. Barger.............4 357
Callaghan v. D., L. & W. R. R.
COs, 2. woseedame aa estise desis 398.
Callaghan v. R, W.&O. RR.
(GG co ang eoebtages nada sane davasvanneannaae 402
Callahan v. NAPs ica davrnarnrae 403
Callanan v. Gilman............ 224
Calligan vy. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
RK, COnwsrcicccatseecnaionenas 405,
Camden & A. R. R. & T. Co. v.
BUrké: ionkecitednatauaiehion sae 98
Camden Co. v. Belknap........ 97
Cameron v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
Ri Re Cosine seccanmemesaee.e & 255
Cameron v. Seaman............ 152
Camp v. Barney.........+-00 ees 90
Camp v. Wood...........0000 354
Camp Mfg. Co. v. Reamer..... 157
Campbell v. City of Syracuse... 210
Campbell v. Kearney........... 433.
Campbell v. Muller............ 15
Gampbell v. N.Y. C. & H.R.
COs tidus wane 288, 404.
Sampbal v. North Am. Brew-
ing Cowsacnsctsgeacenns 447-
Campbell v. Page.............. 8
Campbell v. Perkins............ 99
Campbell v. Schlesinger........ 32
Campbell v. Seaman........... 337
Campbeli v. Stakes............. 16
Campbell v. U. S. Foundry..... 358:
Campbell v. Union Ry. Co..... 415
Campbell v. Wood.........+.+ 447
Canajoharie Nat. Bank v. Dief-
CndOth: saeykercs dice putemerna gy 30
Canavan v. Stuyvesant......... 246
Canfield v. B. & O. R. R. Co... 120
Canfield v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R.
Rie 1 COl cxcxcachund see nine Arouncorad 393
Canfield v. Northern R. R. Co., 130
Cannavan v. Conklin........... 468.
A. Cannon v. Brooklyn City R.
Fes HS Oly ieicinas oa teshaotiaieredn naucaaen aes 2
M. Cannon v. Brooklyn City R.
Res. GO eseectaa vgs dv uaetensa tears acs 93
Canton v. Simpson............. 443
Card v. Manhattan R. R. Co... 47
Card v. N. Y. & H.R. R.Co.. 371
Cardot v. Barney.............4 60
carey v. Cleveland & T. R. R.
Os ahs
Carhart v. Auburn G. L. Co.. a
Carley v. Hodges.............. 155
Carlin v. Mayor, etc, of New
York 192
Carlson v. Oceanic S. S. Co.... 101
Carlson v. Phoenix Bridge Co.. 280
Carney v. Brome..............
Caro v. Metropolitan El. Ry.
COs Bactnauh arcatore es damn annalares 328
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Carolus v. Mayor, ete., of New
MOP chien din Sop dietos aanbencarths 204
Carpenter, Matter of........... 10
Carpenter v. Blake............. 369
Carpenter v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 67
‘Carpenter v. Buffalo, N. Y. & P.
Re Ris COunreargetipacdad imation 402
‘Carpenter v. Carpenter......... 165
‘Carpenter v. Central Park, N. &
E.R. Re GO rebn ounce tuatete 201
‘Carpenter v. City of Cohoes.... 167
Carpenter v. Eastern Trans. Co., 453
Carpenter v. N. Y., N. H. & H.
Re Re COs igunnncancrosaviabarinn.y 86
‘Carpenter v. Shimer........... 322
Carpenter v. Stillwell.......... 137
Carpenter v. Taylor............ 22
Carplesv. N.Y. & H. R.R. or 50
Carrv.N. Y.C.& H.R.R
COs wimes dens cabaret acess 302
Carr v. North River Construc-
HLOR: IGG: e, cescie ms cuadeiverders deters 25
‘Carr va Rishet'y case cians xagrowans 156
Carr v. Sheehan............... 365
Carraher v. Milligan........... 155
baa N. Y., N. H. & H.R.
ch Sasa Sencha aca a deve) Aw at Gp ide neice 5
a a v. Staten Island R. R.
caro v. Weiler............0.- 3
Carter, Ex parte............... 165
Carter v. N, Y. Elevated R. R.
GOe Heyansian sea iiente oe wcaeatists 329
Carter v. Tallcott.............. 367
oer R., W. & O. R. R.
Jd cai ane matteeea eas III
Case v. N. Y.C. & H.R. RR.
GOR dhseisnse Mos wader arxis ets 403
Case v. Northern Cent. R. R.
COS bitch aude amas 382
Case v. Perew....... eee eee es 451
Case v. Pexew...........0-005- 451
Emma Casey v. N. Y. C. & H.
R. R. R. Co sche niGe aR Lee wae 266
. Co
a v. Dry Dock, E, B. & B.
R. R. Co
Caspers v. Dry Dock, E. B. -
* B. R. R. Co
‘Cass v. Third Ave. R. R. Co... 416
Cassidy v. Atlantic Ave. R. R.
(SG 4 ect alan beiatd guaivantia ee 77
‘Cassidy v. City of Poughkeepsie, 210
‘Castle v. Duryea...........6.5 434
Castoriano v. Miller........... 354
‘Caswell v. Allen...........2... 139
Catlin v. Adirondack Co....... 120
‘Catlin v. Patterson............. 339
‘Catlin v. Valentine............. 331
Caton v. Rumney..... wedeitiete. 3: (454
XXXViL
PAGE
Cattaraugus Cutlery Co. v. B,
R» & Pi. Ry: COwsasscncevae ce
Cavanagh v. Dinsmore......... 444
Cavanaugh v. Ocean St. Nav.
CO) sanrsgo wor sdaeniseca a seats 322
Caven v. City of Troy......... 193
Cavin v. City of Brooklyn... 141
Center v. Finne............000 439
Center v. Finney.............45 439
Centilevre v. Ryder............ 20
Cesar v. Karutz...........0.005 247
Chadwick v. Brewsher......... 207
Chadwick v. Woodard......... 247
Chamberlin y. Town of Wheat-
NTs actus cases aaahqan satan 199
Chamberlin v. Western Trans.
Oy 2 ek Gar tien aelnemie inde 07
Chambers v. Lewis............. 150
Champlin v. Village of Penn
VEEL seu odah ne ude npousraieasendoacheei 186
Chandler v. Hoag.............. 152
Chapman v. Atlantic Ave. R. R.
COh. santa nda a Mle aduarmebesas 416
Chapman v. City of Rochester. . 466
Chapman v. Erie Ry. Co....... 253
Chapman v. New Haven R. R.
(GOs | Shhedeintadencai ava lara poieameve hake 54
Chapman v. N. Y. C. & H.R
R: Ry 'Gosaeaxiesacienamvenes 372
Chapman v. Rose.............. 30
Chapman v. Union Bank....... 30
Chapman v. Village of Silver
Gre Cle fe aiwiatiser wave goace'aiaren kauieeurets 222
Charlock v. Freel.............. 195
Chase v. Belden...............5 45
Chase v. Jamestown St. Ry. Co.,. 39
Chaseivs. Lond serc ons se cermenaniten ¢ 148
Chase v. N. Y. = H.R. R. Co.. 75
Chase v. N. Y.C.& H.R. RR.
GOs a Gal anconuocngeie sskareinonamtigns 461
Chase v. Union Stone Co....... 450
Checkley v. Providence & S. S.
Se COivessearans ca awewmnae ens 453
Cheesbrough v. Taylor.........
Chemical Nat. Bank v. Colwell, re
Chenango Bridge Co. v. Lewis, 325
Chenango Erideet Co. v. Paige... 325
Cheney v. N. Y. C -& HR R
R. COrno a hinuse cadamann tn macuslend 399
94
Childs v. Village of West Troy, 194
Chipman v. Palmer............ 466
Chisholm v. Knickerbocker Ice
GOs Hieeisaainietuntomecaeetonva 442
Chisholm ” v. Northern Trans.
Chisholm v. State of New York, ies
Choate v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 426
Christie v. Downe............. 148
Chrystal v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., ae
XXXVIL1
PAGE
Church v. Murphy............. 239
Church of Our Lady of Mercy,
Matter of........... cece ee eee 177
Cincinnati C. Co. v. O’Keefe... 156
City Bank v. R., W. & O. R. R.
COs Metts spncahiivostanctiaen tedsieairays 112
City Nat. Bank v. Nat. Park
Bank? pci cmasaamowdias wecelesis a 158
City of Albany v. Watervliet T.
GE Re Reo C Oia yasau'n sgecard gutsanaaraden past 185
City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn
City Ry Ri Cos dseasicrecese de
City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn
C.& N.R.R. Co..... 433
City of Buffalo v. Holloway.... 230
City of Cohoes v. Morrison.... 230
City of Ogdensburgh v. Love-
JOW ecsceeatenie: scuewesicdactinasks 465
City of Rochester v. Campbell. .
230
230
City of Rochester v. Collins.... 336
City of Rochester v. Erickson... 404
City of Rochester v. Montgom-
OILY, eeaee se tii cca tes tieuctian ee 230
City of Rochester v. Simpson... 339
City of Troy v. Troy & L. R. R.
GOs ait ececniaraierentnchdnd olen 230
Claflin Vis Mey etiade wnenanreagns 24
Clancy v. Byrne................ 469
Clancy v. Troy & L. R. R. Co., 417
Clapp v. Clapp. ............0005 10
Clapp v. H. R. R. R. Co....... 55
Clapp v. Town of Ellington.... 171
Clapper v. Town of Waterford, 188
Clare vy. Nat. City Bank........ 182
Clarissey v. Metropolitan Fire
WDEDE:, thot tcaxadarl ee ereieuts 178
Clark v. Anderson............. 246
Clark v. Barnes................ 303
Clark v. Brown................ 350
Clark v. City of Lockport...... 190
Clark v, City of Rochester..... 227
Clark v. Clark.............0..4. 162
Clark v. Dillon................ 203
Clark v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 57
Clark v. Faxton................ 128
Clark v. Foot.............00008 357
Clark v. Kirnan................ 201
Clark v. Koehler... sess 449
Clathov. Millety.osas.cedead way sac 139
M. Clark v.N. ¥.C. & H.R.R.
Ree CO ison nzesseme tad th cocaine cactiz 394, 403
T. a N.Y.C.&H. RR
Co
Gi aaa aed Manele header begiig 412
c. Sark NW, oe
T. Clark v. N.Y. ‘LE ewe?
Re COs geved teas igmacunadann wa 87
Clark v. Starin..............0.. 346
Clark. Wi, Stott Sicsuciseciosecceware ace 337
ee v. Syracuse & U. R. R.
scone tgrgie ein apaiieste Orbencle vate 371
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Clark v, Thayer..............5. 451
Clark v. Union Ferry Co....... 71
Clarke v. Anderson............ 361
Clarke v. City of Syracuse...... 460-
Clarke v. Crimrnins............ 185
Clarke v. Nassau El. R. R. Co.. 203
Clarke v. Rochester & S. R. R.
GOs: cages wave ncomaiearerevindene Sn clesees 120.
Clarke v. Westcott............. 444.
Classen v. Leopold............. 19
Cleary v. Blake................ 207
vee v. Municipal ee
Cleghorn v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
RE REC Oh actrevemkieranetiten wie -ad Ce 56:
Clemence v. ol of Auburn.... 219.
Clement.v. N. Y.C.& H.R.R.
COusiennadenaiemnd eaten 1¥2
Clement v. Rankin Knitting Co., 29);
Clements v. State of New York, 456
Clendaniel v. Tuckerman....... 115
Cleveland v. N. J. S. B. Co..... 72
Cleveland v. Town of Pittsford, 200
Clifford v. Dam............... 209.
Close v. Noye...........00000. 148
lune v. Brooklyn El. R. R.
er ee 74.
Classen v. Long Island R. R.
GE Sincests yn dvshshicva cos badncenaeded dose nnten 83
Clute v. Wiggins.............. 19)
Cmielewski v. Mollenhauer S.
Ri (Conn asawed anne atesants 303.
Cobb v. Dows............00005 25
Cobb v. Welcher............... 309°
Cochran v. Dinsmore.......... 105
Cochran v. Smith.............. 152
Cocks v. Haviland............. 162
Coddington v. Brooklyn C. T:
Ry Ry GOs acicsiensn tonite wseasious 56:
Coe: Vv, SHUIEZ. oo cdi tece sue obs 337
Coffee v. Phillips.............. 308:
Coffey v. Chapal............... 307
Coffin v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.... 110
Coghlan v. Dinsmore.......... 29
ee v. Third Ave. R. R.
yah colons aes ean ented 425.
R. R. ‘Co Busi een iGyaNoaseedeinisoe Sears 414
Cohen v. Frost................ 98
Cohen v. Mayor, etc., of New
NE OTMK Ga suet slats cnt arenes vteonsecscercs 184
Cohen v. Simmons............. 359:
Cohn, Matter of............... 9
Cohn v. Jarecky............... 367
a vN.Y.C&H RRR
ene Set nenetteha toe atte ER Ra 405
Galbunn v. Trustees, etc., of
Canandaigua ................ 221
Colden v. Eldred
OF CASES CITED.
TABLE
PAGE
Cole v. Fall Brook Coal Co.... 259
Cole v. Goodwin.............0. 08
Cole v. N. Y. pouias COs. sien 178
Cole v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co...... 60
Cole v. Roby.............0.00. 367
Cole v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co.. 289
Cole v. Village of Medina..... 211
Colegrove v. N. Y. & N. H.R.
= Co. and N. Y.& H.R. R.
Os, Ree Beare Blondadesiiace scagines
Colelli v. N. J. & P. Concentrat-
ine WORKS: ccecceeawuaseess wane
Coleman v. Livingston.........
ne v. Second Ave. R. R.
Ges searpivtseg io cteaa napansayoeis Goats Sa
CO ca apeadautecs a wewoken ohwemiawa
Colgrove v. Tallman...........
Collender v. Dinsmore.........
Collins v. ee se of New York..
Collis v. N. @é& E.R. RB.
Colt v. McMechen.............
Colt v. Owens. ..........00008-
Colt v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co....
Colwell v. Manhattan Ry. Co..
Commercial Bank v. Hughes...
Commercial Bank v. Union
Bank
Commercial Bank v. Ten Eyck,
Commercial Bank v. Varnum..
Commerford v. Atlantic Ave. R.
Pilots v.
Commissioners of
Frost
Compton v. Long Island R. R.
GOs, suites aise than cor mak sates
Compton v. Shaw...........+5-
Comstock v. Hopkins..........
Comstock v. N. Y. C. & St. L.
R. R: Co..ieicaansess aeemans
Conboy v. Donaldson
54
277
23
69
8
112
345
107 |
55
16
118
272
80
383°
383
383
400
| 407
456
4to
123
342
39
68
28
29
318
370
XXXIx
PAGE
Condict v. Grand Trunk Ry.
COs anda added nia Cem manlone II5
Cone v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co.. 250
Congden v. D. & H.C. Co..... 406
Conger v. H. R. R. R. Co..... 109
Congress & E. Spring Co. v.
Village of Saratoga Springs.. 146
Congreve v. Morgan........... 208
Congreve v. Smith............. 208
Conhocton S. R. v. B., N.Y. &
Tussle Re RS CO veucieacrenccistel eat 461
Conklin v. ay of Elmira...... 219
Conklin v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
REE 1S Ginds.dseceone hatassudn iret eran 80
Conklin v. Phoenix Mills....... 187
Conklin v. Prospect P. Hotel
CO. sesseyneiss wiewdewweceaed 450
Conklin v. Thompson.......... 178
Conklin Ve Tie. os asce scans eves 32
CO, a arescasrard one ee loteece arias exis 176
Conlan v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
On Sian ena inden ieee 407
Conley v. Albany Ry. Co....... 421
Conlin v. Rogers.............. 269
Connaughton v. Brooklyn & B.
Re Cog eb shea dadaepemend ie 88
Connelly v. Manhattan Ry. 8 54
Connelly v. N. Y.C.& H.R ee
Re COs brchavacutwaneanuenticlatins 386
Connelly v. Rist..............- 280
Connery v. Slavin.............. 443
ol v. City of Brook-
a veto seas Soap Cae eme feta 200
conncity v. Central Vt. R. R.
Lei ant he eare ute Me oe 72
ee aneie v. Knickerbocker Ice
OE:
Cortis v. Dailey..............4.
Corwin v. N. = & E. x x ss aa
Cosgrove v. N. Y. C.
Ryn Re CO usec aa auie gist aa oa - 300
Cosgrove v. Ogden............ 223
Costello v. Judson............. 267
Costello v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y.
RORy COndace cas giana 404
PAGE
Coster v. Mayor, etc., of 2
bany
Costikyan «| RK. W. & O. RR.
Cosulich v. Standard Oil Co.. ae
Cothran v. Collins............. 27
Cott v. Lewiston R. R. Co..... 458
Cottner v. Bettner............. 347
Cotton v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R..
Ry GOs egoe se snersy ansadeen ss 379
Cottrell v. Dimick............. 206
Cottrell v. Marshall Le 459
oe v. N. Y¥. C. 3 Ri
Re (CO gains gcogiinsinnhekaree 90
ao v. Globe Woolen Ces 237
Coulter v. American M.
GOu 4.25. cenarnten ea oe 44s
Countryman v. Lighthill....... 340
Course v. NN. Y., L. E. & WLR
Re’ ©, sasshics v'na'y se etd oe o's 311
Courtney v. Baker............. 234
Courtney v. Cornell............ 278
Cousins v. Carncross........... 169
Covert v. Crawford............ 458
Cowan v. Snyder.............. 447
Cowan v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 42t
a v. Knickerbocker Ice
Sdeebisbeas rect ecbon sceicnchsuesss atthe 453
Conley Ve PEOpl6s ou wcisescsiacsen ees 147
Coxv.N. Y.C.&® HR. RR. ©
COs Aeieatesrra tha mtn Sucnsera yes 65
Cox v. Westchester Turnpike
CO. supers s yess ees easy eRe 3 197
Coxhead v. Johnson........... 229
Coy v. Utica & S. R. R. Co..... 385
Coykendall v. Constable........ 345
Coykendall v. Eaton........... 2I
Coyle v. Long Island R. R. Co., gor
Coyle v. Pierrepont............ 234
Coyle v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 416
Coyle v. Western R. R. Co..... 115
Crabb v. Young............055 166
Cragin v. N. Y.C. & H.R.R.
Re COnicunzs saavene seeders 121
Craig v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 312
Craig v. Parkis................ 345
Craighead v. Brooklyn City R.
Res@Oneeviv ise Gite Soe oes we ole 19
Crandall v, Eldridge........... 357
ones v. Lehigh Valley R. R.
ee ee 88
Cranford v. Tyrrell............ i36
ant v. Forty-second St. R. R.
ies olen as Hae ae a 66 MEN 8.
Cranston v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R. :
Opa see ard «thie Roencueca tontttors 379
‘Crary v. Marshall.............. 452
Crawford v, D.,'L. & W. R. R.
COs Cana ta nate awaaeene oe
Crawford Vv. Bs: Y. C. & H.R. sey
Re RY CO. sissiawe veaeseceades 375
TABLE OF CASES CITED. xli
Crawford v. West Side Bank.. "6
Crawford v. Wilson & B. Mig.
COs. ined awed yale dirand aia 206
Crebarry v. National Transit
CO’ crease aint catiohe tree ceed waes 207
Creed v. Hartman............. 206
Cregan v. Marston............. 281
Cregin v. Brooklyn C. T. R. R.
COy. -wesieeecaere mds Ree wes aralen We 43
Crispin v. Babbitt............. 310
Crist v. Erie Ry. Co........... 382
Crittenden v. Wilson........... 459
Croft v. Williams.............. 162
Crogan v.N. Y.& H.R. R. es 47
Crocheron v. North S. S. I. F.
COn weakadnceh seman outin 890
gs (seater oe iach iia ile he neta es 448
Gane v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Orscidy seu tagsuencetuasconiauavann ee 4o1
Cronin v. People.............. 331
Cronkite v. Wells............. 108
Cropsey'v. Murphy............ 331
Crosby v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Ru C Oiig ne eee act inseco anand 304
Cross v. City of Elmira........ 211
Cross v. Koster...........0..05 185
Crowe v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Re AGG. aces pscocenusacesietarsuanetine 314
Crowell v. Thomas............ 276
Crowley v. Metropolitan St. Ry.
GOs yas aden weknderat iad eiscan es 42
‘Crowley v. Palen.............. 444
Crowley v. Panama R. R. Co.. 90
CHOW Vi. OTR peeeccceng ceases 307
Crowther v. City of Yonkers.. 193
Crouse v. First National Bank, 27
Crozier v. Boston, N. Y. & N.
S.. Si COsssaeen sewage segeeress 86
Crozier v. Read............... 440
Cruty v. Erie Ry. Co.......... 250
‘Cuddeback v. D. & H. C. Co.. 456
Cuddeback v. densi ov cereede Rua 377
Culharev. N. Y.C. & H. R.R.
TREC Oicecvccws lain eacavuacerteca Sianssnaete 402
Cullen v. D. & H. C. Co....... 387
Cullen v. National S. M. R. Co., 306
Cullen v. Norton.............. 249
Culligan v. Jones.............. 207
Cuming v. Brooklyn City R. R.
Cosy pea jiartslan ciauamarn peer 430
Cumming v. Brooklyn City R.
Re (GG isissisctarssscacsietudigica araayeaaniion 422
Cummings v. American G. S.
COs tte minnty as athe eee eamcaueers 156
‘Cummings v. Brooklyn City R.
Re CO ics saetanccatat.e exes 401
Cummings v. City of Syracuse, 173
‘Cunningham v. Bay State S. &
Tug Co ese el cn eteocl ie valmatan av ateebunte tenets 232
PAGE
Cunningham yv. Syracuse Imp.
Cov) ca tctacmecediten meta aes ced 280
Cunningham v. Wright........ 198
Curran v. Warren Chemical Co., 238
Curran v. Weiss.............. 362
Currier v. Henderson.......... 236
Currier v. ees & L. C. 3
np Nay RE ON a nig cesesevaioaccapaeva sonra Gora 37
Curry v v. City of Buffalo.. . 142
Curry v. Rochester Ry. Ce oiruias 428
Curry v. Union El. Ry. Co..... 423
Curtin v. Metropolitan St. Ry.
GOs seh ccco ouevestoncrean ae autauueees 421
Curtin v. Western U. T. Co.... 435
Curtis v. Avon, G. & M. M. R.
FRia UG Oi iene letenisdiec esclstueeame craamenatie' 06
Curtis v. D., fa ee 95
Curtis v. Rochester & S. R.
COe, wicker Mut acu da walaniod seaman ae 59
Curtiss v. Ayrault............. 304
Curtiss v. Prinderville......... 23
Cushen v. City of Auburn...... 219
Cushing v. Board of Health... 331
Cusick v. Adams.. isredee AOS
Cutting v. Marlor.............. 158
Cushman v. Oothout........... 24
Cuyler v. Decker............... 54
. D
Dabney v. Stephens............ 159
Daggett v. City of Cohoes..... 145
Dale v. Brinkerhoff........... 19
Dale v. Brooklyn City R. R.
Coe nsexs atch Bre nacal neta eare- tka a 51
Dale v. City of Syracuse....... 188
Dale v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co.. 70
Daley v. Port Jervis, M. & N.
Y. R. R. Co
Bh idee Laces ft 49
Daley: vi Schaaf. cccecverwcr sae 284
Daley v. Union Dry Dock Co.. 279
Dallmari v. Wilcox............ 466
Daly v. Smith Carpet Co....... 284
Dalzell v. Long Island R. R.
GOe wiaiwercs ar eaee caeeiea ees gt
Dana v. Crown Point Iron < 302
Dana v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R
Co.
Danaher v. City of Pe . 147
Daniels v. Staten Island R. T.
GO toleaanfecnaly we ysausitgeoratente sate 406
Darling v. Mayor, etc., of New
York
Darlington v. Mayor, etc., of
New Morksiis cunieicisinspeds aia 133
27
Dascomb v. Buffalo R. R. Co... 386
Dassent, Matter of............. 147
Dater v. Fletcher.............. 441
Daub v. Yonkers R. R, Co..... 61
xlii
PAGE
Dauchy v. Silliman........... 122
Davenport v. Brooklyn City R.
Ry Co.cc aimereneas cyanea 51
Davenport v. Ruckman........ 206
Davidson v. Cornell............ 277
Davidson v. Holden........... 124
Davidson v. Sloan...........-+ 241
Davies v. Pelham Hod EI. Co., 236
Davis v. Cayuga R. R. Co..... IOI
Davis v. Citv of Kingston...... 219
Davis v. Kerr.........2000 eee: 162
Davis v. Lehigh Valley R. R.
(GOS alee ebrek oteh apels wigietraninantied, 38
Davis v. Mayor, etc., of New
VOTE oo coe tes BE Fea 333
Davis v. N. ¥. C. & H. R. R.
Roe (GO in the bacaia 5 ote wo gpabems ee 304
Davis v. A Y., L. E. & W. R.
Ree (GOs: witawa'cwa remain ei 273
Davis v. WN. Y., N. H. & H.R.
R. Coascss anaes animales ee 410
Davis v. Pattison.............. II9
Davis v. Standish.............. 32
Davis v. Staten Island R. T. R.
Ry / CObtac axcccmen raided 256
Davis v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 64
Davison v. Association for, etc., 15
Dawson v. City of Troy........ 218
Day v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 88
Day v. Crossman.............- 174
Day v. Flushing, N. & S. R. R.
COs esa rapa onee dese 380
Day v. Reynolds.............-. 136
Dayton v. N. Y., L. E. & WLR.
Rie COias saws. ao ducers ds 38 Bree 377
Dean, Matter of............... 10
Dean v. Driggs...............- 23
Debevoise v. N. Y., L. E. & W
R. R. Co . 320
Decker v. Manhattan “Ry. (a, 47
Deegan v. Capel............... 447
De Fonclear v. Shottenkirk.... 15
De Forest v. Jewett............ 261
Degaramo, Matter of.......... 413
Degnan v. Brooklyn City R. R.
CO. ssaavdesxadsieomdad eoeese 416
Degnan v. Ransom............ 368
De Grauw v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
Re Re. GOs seocscnad Oi eomaneme 286
De Grauw v. Supervisors of
Queens Cosas cinveree ira ves 140
Deigleman v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
IRE 5 EOP accu sect ssitlaac fossa ta caye eo 363
De Kay v. N. Y,, L.E. & W.R.
R. Co.. .. 259
Delafield v. Union ‘Ferry Co. . 451
De Laney v. Blizzard.......... 464
Delaney v. Heartt............. 281
Delaney v. Hilton............. 267
Delaney v. Pennsylvania R. R.
ICO). waicenaadioasy qmmanaspeeunee 470
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Delaney v. Yonkers R. R, Co.. 418
D. & H. C. Co. v. Lawrence... 464
Delaware Bank v. Smith....... 16
Delmonico v. Mayor, etc., of
New York...........0c.0000
De Loge v. N. Y.C. & H. R.R.
De Long vy. Curtis...........0. 462
iy apanie D., L. & W. R. R.
oO
Del Sejnore v. Hallinan. ........ 271
Demann v. Eighth Ave. R. R.
oO.
Demarest v. Flack...:.........
Demby v. City of Kingston.... 466
Demond v. Brooklyn City R. R.
CO’ ¢ damtieicacoanes + miphatarare es 42
Demott v. Laraway............
Dempsey v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
Ri Re GG igs digs atsenanbuie wtitpae oe 408
Denair v, City of Brooklyn..... 189:
Denison v. Seymour........... 452
Denken v. Canavan........... 348.
Dennerlein v. Dennerlein...... 450
Dennis v. Harris.............. 358:
Denny v. Manhattan Co....... 149
Denton v. Kernochan.......... 302
Denvy v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Ri GO aa sa peemean: ov eee aeenieh 62
De Peyster v. Clarkson........ 163
Depierris v. Mattern........... 335
Depirro v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R
Re COs ix cubes sealaces wueceets 36
De Puy v. Cook...........0005 33.
De Puy v. oe Asa hate asana a vet 33
Dering v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Re COt caniwsaenvsceanunamatens Iz
De Rozas v. Metropolitan St
FRY 1G hassia hs cisavesos sutcusasaes segede wales vi
Derrenbacher v. Lehigh Valley
Raves OO ga: tal ctoa ur tal daa hedetada craucts as
De Rutte v. N. Y., A. & B. T.
CO acct apace ere Give mane wat 436:
Dervin v. Herrman............ 267
Desmond v. Rose.............- 321
De Soucey v. Manhattan Ry.
Oly asks BalrechgeaG Anka alata dey anette 85
Detouches v. Peck............. 93
Dettmers v. Brooklyn Heights
Re Ree COs fost ene hnatoteaes 413
Deufel v. Long Island City.... 219:
De Vau v. Pennsylvania & N. y.
C. & R. R. Co..
Devine v. Brooklyn Heights R.
Ree COs siaainiie ve tote ayes ealcaenyar 2 sabes 228
Devine v. Tarrytown & I. V.
Gas-light Co..
ee v. Atlantic Ave. R. a
283
271
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Devlin v. Metropolitan St. Ry.
COs ueeinwsienpaniaerria Seale eewe, 252 |
Devlin Ve Smiths cise ci are ees 296
De Voe v. Van Vranken....... 192
De Wardener v. TE ceoeleet
St. Ry COs sic secs inanleingesv tees 433
Dexter v. Syracuse, B. “& N. Y.
Re Ry Coss aan sioweaeaxswamnunes IOr
Dexter v. eg of Fulton.... 174
Deyov. N. Y.C.& H. RR. R.
COs aeilnaderaicinon ean tenth 59
Deyo v. Stewart...........005- I
Deyoe v. Village of Saratoga
SPTINGS: «vise viaiawvecen new eae 194
De Young v. Irving............ 311
Diamond v. City of Brooklyn. 183
Diamond Brick Co. v. C.
GF. Ry Re Re 16 Ois aac veces 372
Dibb v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B.
Ria, UR CO cas ssertnacaonaalecenoeant os 288,
Dibble v. N, Y. &ErieR. R.Co. 59
Diblin v. Murphy.............. 447
Dickens v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co..
78, 93
Dickey v. Grant................ 124
Dickins v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co... 93
Dickinson v. Mayor, etc., of
New York............... 189, 218
Dickinson v. Vanderpoel....... 247
Dickson v. Broadway & S. A. R.
Rie CO: stirs tated eenicleins 40, 92
Dickson v, Frazer...........-.- 138
Dickson v. McCoy. 7
Dieboldt v. U.S. Tetine Co.. * 200
Diebolt v. Jewett............... 306
Dieffenbach v. N. Y., L. E. &
We RR AR COs creccresstecapseancieierers 56
Dike v. Erie Ry. Co........... 90
Dill v. Voshall................. 188
Dillaye v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co.... 50
. Dillon v. Acme Oil Co........ 338
Dillon v. Manhattan Ry. Co... 47
Dillon v. N. Y. & Erie R. R.
Co.
degusnpiainly crass teuen stone ihiaa esr 128
Dillon v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co.. 204
Dimick v. Haskins............ I
Dingley v. Star Knitting Co... 306
Dininny v. N. Y.& N. H.R. R.
GB cb sees ea cpdeens esa Bien deci 05
Dinnihan v. Lake Ontario B. I.
(GO a eiaiussterceen ace wins ezAaiese ates 346
Dintruff v. Rochester City & B.
Re Rs Gok i cecd caniteaaus tes 426
Disbrow v. Mills.............. 139
Disbrow v. Tenbroeck......... 16
Dis v. Metropolitan St. Ry. :
AoE ORME Heaney 4ié
finery N.Y.C & BRR.
Re CO neoreanateer svat geolan penrotge 4 ee
COw aes am out nceinwiasiin estan wean 37
: PAGE;
Ditberner v. Rodgers.......... 237
Ditchett v. Spuyten D, & P. M.
Rie Ri (Con agasd Mero nawanens 203.
Diveny v. City of Elmira....... ait
Divver v. Hall................- 316
weg v. Brooklyn City & N. R.
iebevaaesclavtars aud atentreunte wea 3
Dixon v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Oiiccoceattene socseseayoexan weredunn 376
Dixon v. Western U. T. Co.. . 435
Diabola v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 54.
Dobbins v. Brown............. 269
Dobert v. Troy City Ry. Co... 40
Dobiecki v. Sharp............. 68.
Dodd v. Bell...............005 310
Doellner v. Tynan............. 335.
Doherty v. Lord.............. 441
Doherty v. Sweetser.......... 7,
Doing v. N. Y., & W. Ry
COs iacicrnadenantniga nia aeene's 251
Dolan v. D. & H. C. Co....... 397
Dolan v. Newburgh, D. & C.R
Ry (COs minaveannaanensnsa nae 376
Dollard v, Roberts............. 239:
Doller v. Union Ry. Co....... 423
Dolm v. Dawson.............. 234.
Dominick v. Hill.............. 229.
Donahue v. Kendall........... 244
Donahue v. State of New York, 170.
Donelly v. Cowen.............. 226
Donivan v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 46
Donnegan v. Erhardt......252, 376
Donnelly v. Brooklyn City R. R.
GO). Steed eeaeaetkwies Mace 417
Donnelly v. Brown............ 204
Donnelly v. City of Brooklyn.. 135.
Donnelly v. Jenkins............ 354.
Donnelly v. Wally st mraraea were ene 350
Donnelly v. N. Y. & H.R. R
CO 5, sespin auiiauaindicieen +a apie se 289-
Donnelly v. Pancoast.......... 157
Donner v. Ogilvie............. 24t
Donohue v. Brooklyn City R.
Ris, EO Nasin.c ie ce wocusucei aareateuayes td 259
Donohue v. L. S. & M. S. Ry.
CO vaca cn tote eee Sepa cans 400.
Donohue v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 45.
Donohue v. Mayor, etc., of New
York ..... DM citauteneGinnadene) 462
Donohue v. Syracuse & E. S.
RVs (COs acciiaivy caaateaideners 204
Donovan v. Board of Educa-
HOD acawa semesters ead et Phones 360:
Donovan v. Compagnie G. T.. 101
Donovan v. Long Island R. R.
GO fcutaval stator desmate aterame 307
Donovan v. McAlpin......:.... 360:
Doran v. City of Troy......... 204
Doran v. East River Ferry Co.. 68
Dorland v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Ri: COhaeas gases ion acento 469:
xliv
PAGE
Dorlon v. City of Brooklyn.... 197
Dorman v. Broadway R. R. Co., 430
Dorn v. Town of Oyster Bay.. 199
D’Oro v. Atlantic Ave. R. R.
COs dice hihwndinnts JOST Ce Eee 428
Dorr v. N. J. S. Nav. Co.. . IIg
Dorrity v. Rapp.......--+-+++> 359
Dougan v. Champlain Trans.
CO). cock eae te Meee os a's carsales 72
Dougherty v. Bunting......... 34T
Dougherty v. King............ 384
Dougherty v. R, W. & O. R
Co
Dougherty v. Village of Horse-
Heads: ccs cvensr Gow aha 201
Douglass v. R., W. & O. R. R.
COs airawg.ds iiaw goad weer en 382:
Doupe v. Genin. ........ee sees 243
Dow v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R.
CO: sacs sisdsesaatajnseres 255
Dowd v. Brooklyn Heights R.
Rie 1GGs avcaces 14 se eneeae ses 432
Dowd v. Fitzpatrick........... 240
Dowling v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.
Re COaviess taeoknaew an dten 393
Downer v. Madison Co. Bank.. 28
Downey v. Inman S. S. Co..... 08
Downey v. Low...........00005 210
Downs v. Central Vermont R.
RSS COs ve cue nndarnue oe aia eek aS
Downs v. N. ¥. C. R. R. Co... 35
Doyle v. Albany Ry. Co....... 40
Doyle vi Bairdicne cas: seacee cas 271
Doyle v. Long Island R. R.
CO, caicciamnnamsig Sea 64n Be 405
Doyle Vi Milre tie... ose cece ee we 214
Doyle v. N. Y. Eye & Ear In-
AMARY® joacirnct cic scene ae ese 369
Doyle v. Pennsylvania & N. Y.
G. & Ry Re COs sec ssers eeeeas 404
Doyle v. Rector, etc., of Trinity
CHURN, saci So autenud ca eons anule wae BST
Doyle v. White................ 289
Drake v. H. R. R. R. Co....... 332
Drake v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Ry. Cos sarasevistcese areas es 20
Drake v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
Re GO sees secte se Ae fee Beacnieeenie a 462
Draper v. D. & H®C. Co....... 114
Draper v. Rochester & P. R. R
GOs. aes ees een a Ae Pree Bees 374
Dressell v. City of Kingston... 215
Drew v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co.. 53
Drinkwater v. Dinsmore....... 201
Driscoll v. Mayor, etc., of New
WO euscvecs oat eneetinan dens 222
Driscoll v. Newark & R. L,,
& Cy COs cs ectcartwayasage a4 348
Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 328
Dubois v. Budlong............ 331
=
‘Duncan v. City of Buffalo.....
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Dubois v. City of Kingston..... 225
Du Bois v. Decker............ 369
Dubois v. Miller............... 31
Du Boise v. N. Y. C. & H.R
ROR, COiisc sist reainae cea oe 398
Duckworth v. Roach........... 154
Dudley v. Bolles............... 439
Dudley v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
Re COn a.jticns Monmuatiacn Sec egaee 311
Dudley v. Parker.............. 33
Dudley v. Westcott............ 449
Duff v. Mayor, etc., of New
York
ie ane uad MES ANA REN Bebe 142
Duffy v. Duncan............... 166
Duffy v. N. Y. R. R. Co...... 373
Duffy v. Thompson............ 101
Duke v. Tenth and T. St. F.
[Co nararrere nr ete eee eee 35
Dukes v. Eastern Distilling Co., 301
Dumes v. Si
Dunckle v. Kocker............
Dunham v. B. & A. R. R. Co.. 11
Dunham v. Trustees, etc., of
Canandaigua .............0.. 220
Dunlap v. Snyder............. 6
Dunn v. Ballantyne............ 470
Dunn v. Connell............... 320
Dunn v. Durant............... 354
Dunn v. New Haven S.S. Co.. &
Dunning v. Jacobs............. 361
Dunning v. Roberts........... 324
Dunphy v. Erie Ry. Co........ 63
Dunsbach v. Hallister.......... 365
Dunscomb v. Dunscomb....... 165
Dunson v, N. Y. C. R. R. Co... 116
Durand v. Acken.............. 225
Durant v. Lipsius............. 444
Durfee v. Johnstown, G. & F.
Re wR: COs sa see aueaave itis 4!
Durkee v. D. & H. C. Co...... 388
Durkin v. City of Troy........ 218
Durkin v. Sharp............... 266
Durr v. Village of Green Island, 221
Duryea v .Mayor, etc., of New
sig tet tla tala sta och MEA 133, 144
Dutchess Co. M. I. Co. v.
Hachfield ....... 0.0... cc cues 29
Dwight v. Elmira, C. & N. R.
Ris. COmarticcss: stancnsa nape. 383
Dwinelle v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
R: (Re (Consaess ses eeawemseras 46
Dwyer v. Buffalo G. E. Co..... 160
Dwyer v. D. & H.C. Co...... 255
Dye v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co... 259
Dyer v. Erie Ry. Co.......... 392
Dygert v. Bradley............. 452
Dygert v. Schenck............. 188
Dykman v. Keeney............ 158
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
E
PAGE
Eades v. Clark..............00. 272
Eagan v. Tucker.............. 270
Eagle v. Swayze............... 247
Eakin v. Brown............... 361
Earing v. Lansing............. 439
Earl v. Beadleston............. 358
Fatl ve Crochet es ctiasagenaed 223
Earl v. Van Alstine............ 9
Earle v. Cadmus............... 102
Earle v. Earle....... Recital li Sh 165
East R. G. L. Co. v. Donnelly... 141
Easterbrook v. Erie R. R. Co.. 458
Easterly v. Barber............. 153
Eastman v. Mayor, etc., of New
POLK 4 shrchadtds ai er pitetnte Sine ewes 132
Eastman v. State of New York, 171
Eastwood v. Retsof Mining Co., 293
Eaton v. D., L. & W. R. R R. Co. 87
Eaton v. Erie Rye CGisseeas eines 386
Eaton v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Ri. CO: aware raa sitmesn as stan 288
Eccles v. Darragh............. 179
Eckensberger v. Amend....... 449
Eckert v. Long Island R. R.
COs: iss wire aaa Pe aero eee eee 406
Edall v. New England R. R.
COs eiavaraynaieners 22h seleantegh enaoesetes 260
Edgerton v. N. Y. & H.R. R.
CO a sis elrtgocne Seon ind vee 60
Edsall v. C. & A. R. R. Co.. 114
Edsall v. Vandemark.. ise . 448
Edson v. Weston.............. ai
Edwards, Matter of............
Edwards v. Buffalo, R. & P. Ry.
CO: wabsedatexs ko wea Eetess 377
Edwards v. Jones.............. 234
Edwards v. N. Y. & H.R. R.
1G: caSaiatatvin te te aetanimeios 360
Egan v. Berkshire Apartment
Assn.
Egan v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B.
Re Re CO mannatentat nathnces 274
Egan v. Forty-second St. & G.
bt; Ba R. Re Coss. 205s dewases 202
Egan v. N. J. S. B. Co........ 66
Eggleston v. Columbia Turn-
Pikt@ ‘COxca a dasasaacees «daar 198
Ehrgott v. Mayor, etc., of New
Work «av ees wsaees Pee aes 193
Ehrman v. Brooklyn City R.
Re “CG sdtaidancncen wins eam eanes 424
Ehrmann vy. Nassau Electric R.
Re Conse: ssemdeniy sverwusges 22
Tey bess wetnaweracibeods 418
Eighme v. R., W. & O. R. R.
CO. departs e a eOSAR pe be eees 384
Ejiser v. Archer................ 296
Eisler v. Union T. & S. Co..... 25
Ekendahl v. Hayes............. 304
PAGE
Eldridge v. Atlas S. S. Co..... 303
Eldridge v. Long Island R. R.
COs ca slera'ercautehsisimasés wane datadesicals 3
Elgie y. City of Troy.......... 323
Elias v. Sutherland......... 223, 339
Ellick v. Metropolitan St. Ry.
COs athe pesca ee esau a 42a
Elliott v. Barry...............-
Elliott v. N.Y. C.& H.R. R
Rie COie ss enue eum. eee 63, 74
Elliott v. Rossell............... 123
Ellis v. Duncan...............- 364
Ellis v. Houston............... 314
Ellis v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.R.
CO iacaii's serena ten hen aie 257
Ellis v, Village of Lowville.... 211
Ellsworth v. Putnam........... : 465
Elmore v. Sands.............. o2
Elsas v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 433
Elsey v. Postal T. Co.......... 436
Elwood v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
RE AIG Gis toss anveatacehe ara ake aes 80.
Elwood v. Western U. T. Co... 436
Ely v. Campbell............... 338
Ely v. New Haven S. B. Co... 114
Ely v.N. ¥.C.& H.R RR.
CGF satires Sac. aveata hice Merstiuas 283
Ely v. Supervisors of Niagara.. 134
Elze v. Baumann.............. 443
Embler v. Town of Walkill.... 183
Emery v. Erskine............. 458
Emigrant M. C, v. Brooklyn El.
Ry Re CO: 254 odasagracie ae aeue & 330
Emmons v. Campbell....... 335
Empire S. Sav. Bank v. Beard, 158
Enair v. City of Brooklyn..... 189
Endress v..L. S. & M. S. Ry.
CO» sacunetcta Lan enonea tenes 398
Engel v. Eureka Club.......... 352
Engelback v. Ibert............. 446
Engle v. Mayor, etc., of New
MiGERS sien ive subs epi evigivene coed See 135
Englehardt v, D., L. & W. R.R.
GOs. gataperate 5 nas ws senavinenie’s eas 258
English v. Brennan............ 181
English v. D. & H. C. Co..... 62
Enk v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 51
Ennis: ‘V.. Grays.e sic sie saunnaae ¥ 0 160
Ensign vv. Supervisors of Liv-
INGStON: CO... ose sca eaunesendis 174
Epperson v. Brooklyn City &
IN, Ri Rs (COs as ccna wenger 51
Evnalt vi Marshall... .secces ss 305
Erickson v. Brooklyn Heights
RY OR CO gaeiecesc ad ane ednerinanviae 40
Erickson v. Smith............: 65
Erickson v. Twenty-third St. :
Ry: Coveceasesss ei aichos i2% 433
ae v. Brown Hoisting & C.
Rusts, H.R. R. R. Co....... 386
xlvi
PAGE
Erwin v. Neversink S. S. Co... 454
Eschbach v. Hughes........... 242
Eistatevot Aw Bi snesseseaae os ee 305
Estés: ¥., BurnS.asessceox onecces I51
Estes v. St. Paul, M. & M. R.
C. 1. R_R. Co... cece eee eee 430
Evans v. City of Utica......... 220
Evans v. Keystone Gas Co..... 161
Evans v. L. S. & M. S. Ry Co.. 302
Evans v. Vogt & Bros. Mfg.
Oh. eo skeig MRwwREE ne ees 284
Evarts v.. Kiehl. cisesewssacevas 149
Eveleigh v. Hounsfield......... 169
Evers v. Hudson River Bridge
CO’ sects cia aeoreneaeeageoe tay 169
Eye v. Atlantic Ave. R. R.
yansaed macamieentanesemaees 421
Ghkanee F. I. Co. v. D. & H.
Good suai ntomenes ae eneees 457
F
Fahr v. Manhattan Ry. Co..... 47
Pahy vi. FareOnciansdiscnaece ae 31
Fahy v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co.. 287
Fairchild v. Bentley............ 3
Fairchild v. Slocum............ 127
Fairfax v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
RR, CO iaa ead gursioussaninn HO. & Gashacdie 96
Falkenan v. Fargo............. 105
Fallon v. Central P., N. & E. R.
Reh COE sae ntigh marslscuo waren i 6 429
Falotio v. Eepsgwey R. R. Co., 429
Fancher v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
Re Re CG is sinicsncan ons cca seacd oth Beetle 319
Fandel v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 421
Fannessey v. Western Union T.
(CO y nak Sivek ated Ae eae ates 278
Fanning v. Hagadorn.......... 4
Fanning v. Long Island R. R.
GGy. saskedsaw esas cies vagacees 375
Farley v. McConnell........... 195
Farley v. Mayor, etc., of New
MOGKS Be acaceaee nace ieees 200, 447
Farley ‘v, Picard: os aso esine saves
Farman v. Town of Ellington.. 196
Farmer v. ee Sav.
TS Ey sencedcadann tMboc ah equsnseoncaeudveet 13
Farmers’ & M. N Bank v. Erie
Rivas, 2C 0 escinetaa astreu ache baat pa 112
Farrell v. Houston & W. S. &
Pe Be Ryiiecsare nan va hoeaitua yosans 85
Farrell v. Mayor, etc., of New
MiGEG vaiidd aiken if aonhalwoatuerads 327
Farwell v. Davis...........4.4. 108
Fash v. Third Ave. R. R. i. 202
Fasshender v. Western T. Co... 129
Fastnacht v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
Ry Rev COpt causes citeawatereneas 387
Faucet v. Nichols.............. 18
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
P.
Faulkner v. Erie Ry. Co.....5. 450
Faulkner v. Hart.............. Il
Faurot v.' Brooklyn Heights R.
Ree WO ak aie senna oe elegant 421
Faveo v. Troy & W. T. Bridge
GCOe cere cexG oy BEEW AIRE dices 174
Fay v. McGuire: es. eccceses vee 367
Fay v. Pown of Lindley........ 190
Featherson v. Newburg & C.
Lurnpike - Coww. acta yerendscnestes 3 201
Feeney v. Long Island R. R.
GOh wastes 9 eae Are useise ead os 379
Feeney v. Minnisceongo T. Co., 454
Feeny v. Brooklyn City R.
CObe datas ene ale aistaiastetacmmpieawes 45
Fefdowski v. D. & H. C. Co... 309
Feiber v. Manhattan D. T. Co.. 321
Feick v. Andel... ccusces canes ne
Feinstein v. Jacobs............
Feldman v. De Nedetlendache
Si Mine Mei coe craven etn dean aaa 125
Feldstein v. Old Dominion S.
Se OGawa aes ce ween as aceon 113
Pe ee eee els ee
Fea a NY CRE RR
Ris SC Oren te Aid coco nave 388
Feltman v. Gulf Brewery....... 24
Feneran v. Singer Mfg. ey Bueresh 327
Fenner v. Buffalo & S. L. R. R.
GON. sass esi fadve:cbntontkoebonse tedearitens IIS
Fenton v. Robinson........... 30
Fenton v. Second Ave. R. R.
GO sarees aaestaycaath nein ns ieaiacnmacenh 424
Ferguson vy, Ehret............. 441
Ferguson v. Hubbell........... 357
Ferguson v. Smith............. 309
Fero v. Buffalo & S. L. R. R.
OOS acsien tre oe eeeamves ate urement 382
Ferrand v. Marshall....... ma
Ferris v. Aldrich............... s
Ferris v. Union Ferry Co 34
Ferry v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 33
Fibel v. Livingston............ 107
Field v. Cutler................. 344
Field v, N. Y. C. R. R. Co..... 381
Fiero v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R.
GO sew wise eeiccsctinthec dw daciys lowie nuhes 280
Filbert v. D. & H.C. Co...... 262
H. Filer v. N. ¥. C.R. R. Co.. 37
W. Filer v. N.Y. C. R. R. Co.. 97
Fillo v. Jones............0 0c eae 434
Filson v. Crawford............ 332
Finch v. Brown................ 451
Fink v. Albany & S. R. R. Co.. 62
Finkelstein v. Crane........... 445
Finklestein v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
Re RY SCO cassie Bia kas Biawiaratest ds OI
Co.
Finnel v. D., L.& W. R.R.Co., oad
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Finnerty v. Prentice........... 304
First Nat. Bank v. Dean...,... 25
First Nat. Bank v. Lamon...... 156.
First Nat. Bank v. National
Broadway Bank.............. 149
First Nat. Bank v. Ocean Nat.
BATE | sacha omen gh ethan Hite Il
Fish va Clarks « ccaeywswnetinn wees 132
Fish v. Dodge................. 437
Fish v. Mayor, etc., of Roches-
WEIS sas umn crsacenes eransis nem saetls 176
Push Wie SKU Ga secw-ardmnoard caine
3
Fishback v. Steinway Ry. Co.. 418
Fisher v. Metropolitan El. R. R.
(CO susiss titers Bevin sear aeseedane lana toegiets 44
Fisher v. Rankin.............. 212
Fisher v. Village of Cambridge, 172
Fisk v. Newton................ 113
Fisk v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co.... 41
Fisk v. Wilber................ 467
Fiske v. Bailey...............4 246
ei celasevet ¥ Third Ave, R. R.
seal fa gesesigas chiussape Reset Scan rapide 430
Fitch v. Buffalo & N. Y. R. R.
scene ee oe hts Saarinen reds 371
Fitch Vie Was en ci tavces ess ccehergtles 20
Fitch v. Livingston............ 451
Fitch v. Mayor, etc., of New
MORE 5 scscieye arc seusidsarsacd maveaasblebens ae 226
Fitzgerald, Matter of........... 327
Fitzgerald v. City of Binghamp-
TOD) ssc.cveKdecwemanmenennenis 190
Fitzgerald v. City of Troy...... 195
ae v. Long Island R. R. e
a en: OW aceilas Say as a gy sabi cal pitas sac oN as aye ta 400
Hitegersid v. N.Y. C.& H.R.
Reis Rin. WG Obes ater oust nierls ex averteslshstceuaneors 301
Fitzgerald v. Timony.......... 249
Fitzhenry v. Lamson........... 307
Fitzpatrick v. Garrison’s Ferry
GOs casstss be aarrpa ictus Ree areradncenn, Daas 353
Fitzpatrick v. Slocum.......... 170
Fitzpatrick v. Tweddle......... 469
Fitzsimmons v. McConnell..... 452
Flack v. Brassel............... 138
Flagg v. Manhattan Ry. Co.... 84
Flaherty v. Greenman.......... 99
Flaherty v. Henderson........ » 203
Flanagan v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
Bs WR COs crcccreceenscawcemaniaie 313
Flanagan v. N. Y. & N. H.R.
Ry COscsenawrsevarebeeme ye are 38
Flannery v. Cornell S. S. Co... 451
Flannigan v. American G. Co.. 355
Fleckenstein v. Dry Dock, E.
B. & B: Ri Ry CoOvscscencsers 420
Fleis v. Endicott............... 35
Fleissner v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
Rae CO wes Gaactomaude sae ccs 388
Fleming v. Brooklyn City R. R.
CO ck Satan Grom EROS
Fleming v. D. & H.C. Co.....
Bieene vy. Auburn & S. R. R.
Oise auaaeistncuucten sams evactpacectan bes
Flike v. B. & A. R. R. Co......
cee v.N.Y.C.& H.R. RR.
Ok. er aw eyes okies tunel:
ee vy. Johnson Engineering
Biaed Buffalo, N.Y. & P.R.
Rix OO iis accciate rage anes hcuulae ieee lane
Flood v. Doodley..............
Flood v. Western Un. Tel, Co..
Flower v. Trull................
Floyd v. Erie Ry. Co..........
Flynn v. Central Park R. R. Co.,
Flynn v. Central R. R. of N. J.,
Flynn y. Erie Preserving Co...
Flynn v. Gallagher............
Flynn v. Harlow...............
Flynn v. Hatton.. dieyiee
Flynn v. Maine S. iG. Ges gaeenie
Flynn v. Manhattan Ry. Co.....
Flynn v. N. Y. Elevated R. R.
Oi. (ai desan cca An teheacceiae
Flynn’ v. Taylor
Foels v. Town of Tonawanda..
Hee N. Y.C.& H. R.R.
Co.
Foggett Ve BIS Cher seansoayiarecciies
Foley v. Brooklyn Gaslight Co.,
Foley v. City of Troy..........
Foley v. Manhattan Ry. Co.....
Foley v. Mayor, etc., of New
WOTK? oa wits catia se mamas
Sulmasaee v. City of Amsterdam,
Foot v. Bronson...............
Foot v. Wiswall.............00.
Foote v. Storrs.........0.e000-
Foran v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Ry ‘COesasasascs oayaeadae sees
Ford v. AmeS............0.0005
Ford v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co..
Ford, Vi Ly ONS iii de sete os eee
Ford v. Monroe.............4.
Forde v. Nichols...............
Forey v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y.
Re RY, 160s snc asusiemcnenie aieen
Fort v. Whipple..
Fort Plain Bridge Ca. v. _ smith
ai N.Y.C.& H.R. R.R
OP ac aacuansiy Sea terest eaten to
Fowler v. Dorlon.............-
Fowler v. Holmes..............
Fowler v. Liverpool & G. W. S.
COM siamese anna dinapeeeRGee
Fowler v. Mott.............055
Fowler v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co...
331
- 383
310
389
188
289
26
go
64
407
305
296
295
241
319
384
. 203
341
169
35
II2
224
290
218
84
aa
419
oe
xlvili
PAGE
Fox v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 69
Fox v. Buffalo Park........... 361
Fox v. Le Comte...........-55 307
Fox v. McGregor. ...........4- 10
Fox v. Mayor, etc, of New
VoOtk: saaeprs aveauauiaeusscus 83
Fox v4, Pridétissssc0sencceede's 17
Fox v. Village of Ft, Edward.. 221
Fox v. Village of Lansing-
IP Sh) Asante waaanincwenwee op 225
Fox v. Wabash Ry. Co........ 100
Foy v. Buchanan.............. 31
Foy v. Troy & B. R. R. Co.... 128
Frace v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
R. Co.. wennee 383
France v. Erie R. R. Co. esate 377
France v. R., W. & O.
GOe expen see noma ean armen 287
Francis v. N. Y. Steam Co..... 184
Francis v. Schoelikof........... 340
Francisco v. Troy & L. R. R.
(GOks aatcchanonoc onwen Ace eee erate 76
Frank v. Chemical National
Bank gucorere ei cecmenaeeene 12
, Frank vi Lanietocccsaccscaenas 30
Frank Wi O10 ines. esate atone 310
Frankel v. Mayor, etc., of New
OUKY sect rasa eeran tanner wate 182
Frankfort v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 433
Franklin v. Schermerhorn...... Br
Franklin v. Smith.............. 379
Franklin F. Ins. Co. v. Jenkins, 159
Franz v. Mulligan............. 240
Frazer v. Freeman............. 324
Frazer v. Kimler............... 438
Fredenburg v. Northern Central
Ry, Re (COneain 5: ave weweon erates 262
Freedon v. N, Y. C. & H.R. R.
PR GO te sia gisiene ssc thireitSecese senostaes 4
Freel, Matter of.............06. 143
Freeman v. Glens Falls P. M.
COS, secetecinnsit Rik eeleCorearnige di ieiats 269
Freeman v. Newton........... 190
Freligh v. Village of Saugerties, a
French y. Aulls..
French v. Buffalo, N. ¥. ‘&E. R.
Ric CO iain ven aie ctenaGnranorane Soe ii
French v. Donaldson.
French vy. 2 Vas asters ines baie esas
Ry OR: GOs atetone ciecabagrnmees 371
Fricke v. one Sav. Bk..... 11
Friedman v. Dry Dock, E. B. &
Be Re Re 160) tAncracnaccea haaniyo 423
Frier v. D. & H. C. Co.. 384
Friess v. N. Y. C, & H. RRR.
Co. . 378
Frobisher v. Fifth. Ave. T. ce... 76
Fromm v. Ide................. 228
Fuchs v. Schmidt.............. 216
Fuchs v. Sweeney Mfg. Co.... 305
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
Fuller v. Jamestown St. Ry. Co., 3
Fuller v. Jewett..............., 273
Fulton v. Matthews............ 344
Fulton Bank v. N. Y. & Sharon
SCO ia aseariiircauts esti ater kann 150
Fulton F. I. Co, v. Baldwin.... 457
Furman, v. Union Pacific R. R.
GOe eats valet gain ee es nee aeecnatens 112
Furst v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 429
Furth v. Foster..............4. 177
G
Gabrielson v. Waydell......... 319
Gadney v. Kingsley............ 369
Gaertner v, Schmitt & S...... » a0
Co.
Gage v. D., L.& W.R. R. Goes
Gage v. Village of Hornellsville, 213
Gale v. D., L. & W.R.R.Co.. 63
Gale V.N.Y.C &HRRR.
COs, cd ores eonanaae deat Avoca 378
Gallagher v. McMullin 249
Galvin v. Mayor, etc., of New
York
eat eee 51
Ganley v. Brooklyn City R. R.
Coy. a.darceedna wanna 41
Gannon v. Union Ferry Co.... 34
Garbaczewski v. Third Ave. R.
Ry COcwonusannusie ey stew 77
Gardinier v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
Res RAC Ob us kecepanuvrewtecaverentaans 408
Gardner v. Bennett............ 179
Gardner v. Heart.............. 358
Gardner v. Village of New-
burgh: snes axcsew aeeaenateee 458
Garety v. King..............05 292
Garlinghouse v. Jacobs........ 172
Garniss v. Gardiner............ 166
Garoni v. Compagnie N. D.N., 68
Garratt v. Trustees of Canan-
ALANA sedis sear ea ceed bisetsatenii caters 145
Garrett v. City of Buffalo...... 215
Garrison v. Howe............. 149
Garrison v. Mayor, etc., of New
MOCK sccudigueinmnauacemmeging 469:
Garrity v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y.
RR GG sicepauacesscsn oesnaebaatcchens 4Il
Garvey v. Dung.............5 324
Garvey v. Rane Island R. R.
dl ie Oty coarser areca 6c ahariharea Orarahachien 333
Gastonhopper Vo Glaiteccunenaes 22
Gates v. Preston.............5. 368
Gates v. State of New York.... 298
Gaudin v. Village of Carthage.. 200
Gaul v. Rochester Paper Co... 276
Gawtry v. Doane.............. 29
Gaylord v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y.
Rea IIR WE Oc aavare ic bicessaaacdvatera vace eked 396
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
Gearns v. Bowery Sav. Bank...
Geibel v. Elwell...............
Geiler v. Manhattan Ry. Co....
Geipel v. Steinway Ry. Co.....
Geisenheimer v. ee naga tntve
Geismer v. L. S. & M
COs Sensis ora teg. avn winged eee baetens
Geitelsohn v. Citizens’ Sav.
Bank: Gaia cme cut Amasrueriacly
Genet v. Howland..............
Gent v. Mayor, etc., of New
York
Genung v. N. Y. & New ae
land R. RE ACO. stea rated seuieiace
Geogagn v. N. Y., N. H. & H.
RR: COriacsuectetsg aneewn
Geoghegan v. Atlas S. S. Co..
George v. Depierris............
Geraty v. National Ice Co.....
Gerlach v. Edelmeyer.........
Gernau v. Oceanic St. Nav. Co.,
Germania F. Ins. Co. v.
Memphis & C. R. R. Co.....
Germania Sav. Bank v. Village
of Suspension Bridge........
Germann v. Suburban R. T. Co.,
Getty v. Town of Hamlin......
Ghormley v. Dinsmore........
Gibbons v. Van Alstyne.......
Gibbons v. Village of Phcenix..
Gibbs v. Coykendall............
Gibbs v. Van Buren...........
Giblin v. National S. S. Co...
Gibney v. State of New York. .
Gibson v. American M. U. Exp.
Co.
Gibson v. Culver..............
Gibson v, Denton..............
Gibson v. Erie Ry. Co.........
Gibson v. Northern Central R.
Re CO bsciard caseaisca na RODE RE ATS
Giese v3. Hallincecnstcsacian aes
Gifford v. Babies’ Hospital....
Gilbert v. Beach.............. i:
Gilbert v. Marsh...............
Gilbert v. Mickle..........,...
Gilbert v. Wiman..............
Gilhertson v. Forty-second St.,
M. & St. N. A. Ry. Co......
Gilbrie v. City of Lockport.....
Gildersleeve v. Dixon..........
Gile v. nae sis arate tet eee
Gilhooly v.
COs: acai Sal dialatalpadhtihaiiehtoen
Gill v. Rochester & Pp. R. R.
COs aietseanain seu dyecisne maeracaecd
Gillespie v. City of Newburgh. .
Gillespie v. Dry Dock, E. B. &
B. R. R. Bik coneene aaeea we
PAGE
14
249
33
108
177
219
152
19
97
62
190
xhx
PAGE.
Gilgen v N.Y. & HR. R., ss
Gilman v. Gilman.............. 163
Gilman v. Stevens............. 365
Gilmartin v. Mayor, etc., of New
ViGTIC) si cinssse ssnaeatetasssnaysuaesusytcayapete 181
Gilmore v. Brooklyn Heights R
Roy AG Oiaicscighu tetera incite ecertas se 53
Gilson v. American Exp. Co... 71
Ginna v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 76
Ginnon v. N. Y. & H. R. R.
OS chases bor tieag at demtcceoenite 43
Giraldo v. Coney Island & B. R.
Rie Con eiirch stati eenianse 424
Glasco v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.. 99
Glasier v. Town of New
FREDO NG rece sye cen oecacass wrreacdencare 191
Glasing v. Sharp............... 402
Glassheim v. N. Y. Economical
PAGO ssitacunnatastinenta nd aeasudyn sts 310
Gleadell v. Thomson........... 117
Gleason v. Amsdell............ 182
Gleason v. Clark. ............4. 366
Gleason v. Morrison........... 17
Gleeson v. Brummer........... 245
. Glendening v. Sharp........... 401
Glenn v. Winters.............. 8
Glens Falls G. L. Co. v. Van
Mattei ios scdsiveinienase ge dopoasdeosn 365
Glens Falls P. Co. v. White... 154
Glidden v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
IR (GO tiscoerni cere aun aca maer 35
Glovinsky v. Cunard S. S. Co.. 1o1
Glnck v. Ridgwood Ice Co.... 470
Glushing v. Sharp.. . 306
Glyn v. N. Y. & H.R. R.Co.. 39
Goddard v. Mallory.. 124
Gcdfrey v. County of Queens. . 463
Goff v. Akers..........c. eee eee 446
Gold v. Clyne................. 156
eae v. N.Y. C. & H.R.
CC Diercinesestscehacaps steasiye etapa toes 79
ea v. Health Dep of N. Y., 334
Goldman v. Mason.. , . 305
Goldsmith v. Jones............ 334
Goll v. Manhattan Ry. Co..... 180
Gonzales v. N. Y. & H. R. R.
(GOs aie oiiea tertren a erates amtaneee 2
Goodall v. N. Y.C.& H.R.R.
R., ‘COssndacseuveyneeeezeaes 317
Goodfellow v. es etc., of
New York.. 189
Goodrich v. N.Y. C. & H.R.
IRs Ri CO iiss ienecieiens gerinatg cen catany 259
| Goodrich v. Pennsylvania & N.
Y. C. & R,. R. COcsscesa seas 7%,
Goodrich v. Thompson........ 106
Goodwin v. B. & O. R. R. Co.. 116
Goodwin v. Simonson.......... 345
Goodwin v. Young....... dant 32
Goold v. Chapin............... 126
] ‘TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Geen vy. Grand St. & N. R.
R.. €COniwsevewce ae sodas s ewan
Gordon v. Reynolds Card Mfg.
(BOz, cits Gram peasaenniasce Hee biGuiss tibeee 305
Gore v. Norwich & N. Y. T.
GO): sant eumeid ieoaea seis 86
Gorham v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R.
Ri CGsas sxgacere sxaueegs oes 404
Gorham v. Village of Coopers-
OWA. (eis eds ca ergswauage.s $98.0) sae eee 200
Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Fargo..... 106
Gorman v. McArdle........... 299
Gorman v. White.............. 244
Gorton vy. Erie R. R. Co....... 380
Gottlieb v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
RR: COs wadranaceniice aca nies 250
Gottwald v. Bernheimer........ 438
Gould v. Booth................ 146
Gould v. Hill...............0.. 119
Gourdier v. Cormack.......... 348
Gowan v. Brooklyn C, T. R. R.
Coy iitu'e sao deena la ee 5 er 432
Gowan v. Jackson............. 27
Grady v. Prigge................ 31
Graham v. Chapman........... 266
Graham v. D. & H.C. Co...... 371
Graham v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 75
Gramm v. Village of Greenbush, 221
Grand v. Livingston........... 107
Granger v. Village of Seneca
Falls: os awesaaus- oe 2435 sere es
Grant v. City of Brooklyn...... 224
Grant v. Newton............... 97
Grant v. Pennsylvania & N. Y.
GC. & Ra Re CGn cerca ccs cca 312
Grant v. Town of Enfield...... 196
Grant v. Village of Groton. ... 226
Grapp v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.... 390
Graves v. Brewer.............. 304
Graves v. Otis.............0005 229
Graves v. Santway............. 369
Graville v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 45
Graville v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Rs tC Orica nt anieksamaenoee 385
Gray v. City of Brooklyn... 145
Grae es Rochester C. & B. RR. Z
ae lh ce ad eg 4 re ode 7
Gray v. Second Ave. R. R. Co.. 186
Gray v. Thompson............. 166
Gray v. Tompkins... 438
Greany v. Long Island R. R.
GOs anh ira tia take avg annua 399
Greco v. Bernheimer........... 362
Green v. Banta................ 296
Green v. Clarke............... 113
Green v. D. & H. C. Co....... 316
Green v. Erie Ry. Co.......... 78
Green v. Hornellsville & C. Ry.
GOs: seaciy parece aon donmawe ya. 377
Green v. H. R. R. R. Co....... 8g
Green v. Middlesex R. R. Co... 413
PAGE
Green v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co....
100
Gregory v. Mayor, etc., of New
YOrk’ axis sediveeucusenic ca cece 465
Gregory v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
RC Oi 2 sera sk vereoeasennetbardeeeettcr 89:
Griffin v. Martia 5 ds estos cuore I
Griffin v.,Mayor, etc., of New
ViOrk se jas ene ee 84.65 ewes
Griffin v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.. ie
Griffin v. Utica & B. R. R. B
CO: . ainavade tavta.ba scared 3, 74
Griffith v. Utica & M. R. R. o 61
Griffiths v. N.J.& N.Y. RR
COs. aidee eas gee vena eRneacins 98
Grinell v. Taylor. sis csccvestaneu-ss
Grinnell v. Cook............... PA
Grippen v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co.. 402
Griswold v. Haven............ 23.
Griswold v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.
Ry (COsss sey oy cca gn sue wees 412
Groll v. Prospect Park R. R.
CO} eau prises nncemonaeonian 82
Rea Re AGO eae ose e eee Ba ee 317
Grossman v. Dodd............. 103:
Grossman v. Fargo............ 105,
Grosvenor v. N. Y. C. R. R.
Ge wikmisant eg c¥ a teinsoeacigcen a 118.
Groth v. Washburn........... 444.
Grothier v. Trustees N. Y. & B.
Bride: wesc cdc te mirenciean cain 143
Grotsch v. Steinway Ry. Co... 85
Groves v. City of Rochester... 193.
Gruebler v. Mayor, etc., of New
York
Gruman v. Smith.............. 341
Gubasko v. Mayor, etc., of New
York ..... iain dae Horousteticet ee hes 183:
Guenther v. Lockhart.......... 291
Guggenheimer v. O’Keiffe..... 154.
Guichard v. New............... 350
Guiliano v. Whitenack......... 302
Guilladen v. Coast Wrecking
COs chided bu airGoeeinie So ea eee 304.
Guille-ve Swans wsisieds: sleet winiss 323
Guilliaume v. General T. Co... 113.
Guilliaume v. Hamburgh A, P.
Ceri asi loca tesbearyabetcee od eos SNES 113.
Guillotel v. Mayor, etc., of New
YORK. 6 cs wi avsnaenrnn 2s wee nanan 142
Guiterman v. Liverpool, N. Y
Ge PSS. CO canines waicigs cena 123.
Guldseth v. Carlin............. 233.
Gulliver v. Blauvelt............ 201
umb v. Twenty-third St. R. R.
ee er ee 414.
Co.
Gunnison v. N. Y. & Canada R.
Rie CO hada uaeag aacekauniades BOS
of v. Grand Trunk Ry.
TABLE OF CASES CITED. li
H
PAGE
Haack v. Fearing.............. 434
Haas v. Brown................ 247
Haas v. Buffalo & P. R. R. Co., 314
Haas v. Missionary Soc. of M.
Ts (Ric susamsatrpuse tune atereatnladares 323
Hackford v. N. Y. C. & H. R.
Rea Re COs, hese ticks atcooieaiisieacea bcs 405
Haden v. Clarke............... 43+
Hadencamp v. Second Ave. R.
Re, CO sari manene vavaaditeianeincs 6
Haegi v. Providence & N. Y.
Si Si Coss tints gaat eaietiasteass 58
Hagar’ v:. Clark:..csvsaseseecaes 17
Hagenlocher v. Coney I. & M.
B, Re Re Coin ecr acca case ae es All
Hager v. Buffalo Savings Bank, 14
ee cde v. Brooklyn City &
FR Re CG ios ns. aravscan tbneasya acer’ 429
Haggerty v. Thompson........ 364
Hahnke v. Friedrich........... 6
Haight v. Brisbin............. 166
Haight v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Re) CObrsise veitiar ca moleanianinea irae 380
Hale v. Smith.................
Haley v. Earle................. 453
Haley v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
3
Halfern v. Nassau EI. R. R. ou 40
Hall v. Cooperstown & S. V
Re COngswsxa io pause mwenseae 257
Hall v. Germain............... 33
Hall v. Warner.............-.. 17
Hallahan v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
R. R. Co
Halliday v. Marsh..
Hallock v. Mallett..
Hallock v. Scheyer. .
Halloran v. Bampton.......... 281
Halloran v. N. Y. & H. R. R.
Coy accra ggeske dacs wi eeeeenes 372
Halpin v. Mutual Brewing Co.. 160
Halpin v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 50
Halpin v. Townsend........... 243
Halsey v. R., W. & O. R. R.
Oy segctonsjana eid oa cconael iat hrs 306
Halstead v. Dodge............. I5I
Ham v. Mayor, etc., of New
Work scevicntauscenns saubeas 361
Ham v. Newburgh, D. & C. R.
Ris (CO ang dente atmea eenscdnnees 370.
Ham v. Troy & S. Turnpike
CGOe dakaneiiescacitaeauicresvedtiogs euadeteniv 192
Hamel v. Brooklyn & N. Y. F.
CO. oii Pitas Re ORE EROS 46
Hamilton v. McPherson....... III
Hamilton v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 62
PAGE
Hamilton v. N. Y. & H. R. R.
GO. ctiviueacarnnwarw inane oy 333
Hamilton v. Oswego Water
WORKS) ist ctcns ate nanoancnaceas iene 327
Hamilton v. Third Ave. R. R.
COs udewausncar nag awe 64, a
Hamm v. N. Y.C. R.R. Co..
Hammond v. Fuller.. ies a
Hance v. Rayuiea & SR. R.
oO. oe 373
Hancock v. "Rand.. scales eens eoraed 2
Hand v. Burrows.............. 149
Hand v. Klinker............... 445
Hankins v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
Ry, Rs (Con nxsa7s sgetiemsactaes 254
Hanks v. Drake............... 341
Hanley v. H. R. R. Co........ 58
Hanna v. Nassau El. R. R. Co., 65
Hannigan v. Lehigh & H. R.
Ry» Cox wencexsanceaegenoen 263
Hannigan v, Union Warehouse
COs 5p oanueGauimnaaeaemna ancnuy.: 279
Hannon v. Agnew............. 174
Hanover Nat. Bank v. American
D&T. Cosas os dawenmvences 159
Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R. R.
COS sca ctaletnatuaging ahaa sca 250
Hanrahan v. Cochran.......... 44.
Hanrahan v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 82
Hanse v. Cowing.............. 363
Hansee v. Brooklyn El. R. R.
GO se edoasgbinecessehens Ctuanaeensdecauseaacte 68
Hansen v. Schneider........... 268
Hansen v. Trustees of N. Y. &
Bb BRIG Gop eee se ons a2y ornresacsts 320
Hardegg v. Willards........... 15
Harden v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.
Riv CON i sindgunascn naubasai Guin 469
Hardy v. City of Brooklyn..... 143
Hardy v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.
Haring v. N.Y. & E.R. R. Co, slag
Harkin v. Crumbie............ 245
Harlem C. B. & L. A. v. Mer-
cantile Trust Co............. 12
Harley v. Buffalo Car ae Co., 309
Harlinger v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 87
Harlow v. Humiston........... 186
Harlow v. Mills............... 165,
Hermon v N.Y. & E.R. R.
> Sho 'd we los lantoney eva Rigeathe eis dgvean 122
Harnett v. Bleecher St. R. R.
2 aus ance ue dct leat ecb rpc vnedinlodn 42
Harld N. Y.C.& H.R. R.
OR edinc so nes Sete Barty annie coinds tees 316
Harpell Vv. apo M4 aaa aaeeew ad 438
Harper v. D., L. & W. R. R.
he MOG. se dicen Gash arcnus erakinaabaratnr tenes 403
Harv.N.Y.C&HRRR
COs tava bie sae delun wawnene 261
Harrigan v. City of Brooklyn.. 141
lii TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Harrigan v. Donegan.......... 235
Harrigan v. Village af Hoosick
Falls Sesdeamaub ngs ta sab aeeaiweatite 221
Harrington v. City of Buffalo. . 217
Harrington v. Keteltas.. 163
Harrington v. N. Y. C. & i R
R. R. CO silo arsine ae wena 313
Harrington v. Snyder.. 8
Harris v. Northern Ind. R. R.
COs nciawrsiea cates SiAae wees 109
Harris v. Panama R. R. Co.... 121
Harris vi. P@r ry. cp ccc eicse ececnisieies | 355
Harris v. Thompson........ 460, 467
Harris v. Uebelhoer............ 452
Harris v. Woman’s Hospital... 370
Harrison v. Marshall........... 15
Harrison v. Newton........... 340
Harroun v. Brush El. L. Co... 319
Hart v. City of Brooklyn. . 210
Hart v. D., L. & W.R.R.Co.. 319
Hart v. Direct U. S. C. Co.... 430
Hart v. Erie Ry. Co............ 306
Hart v. Grennell............... 305
Hae v. Hudson River Bridge
Hare v, Mayor, atc., of Albany, g10
Hart v. Mayor, ete., of New
YOnk! a ecc echiw Saw arene Sic go sire 189
Hart v. Naumburg............. 270
Hart v. N. Y. Floating Dry
Dock: COs<2-22524% aheseecen ees “285
a v. Rensselaer & S. R. R.
Lbauden: bard (Bek Redcar duncan Ria 101
Hart Vo RYAN oy tine aatedaeiuey: das 359
Harter v. Blanchard........... 10
Hartfield v. Roper............. 448
Hartshorn v. Chaddock........ 462
Hartwig v. Bay State Shoe & L.
COR Are et nae iceulivatinea ne eee
Harty v. Central R. R. of N. J., 408
Harvey v. Dunlap.............. 324
Harvey v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Re GOe de oe acistialae Sysee coho 265
Harvey v. N. Y.. W. & R. R.
Ri G65 cis. dieeaeceigeseces ot 55
Harvey v. Village of Little Falls, 198
Haskell v. Northern A. R. R
CO sess ca acipn eaten wed we avs 384
Haskell v. Village o& Pen Yan.. 213
Haskin v. N. ¥.C.& H.R. R.
Rei Oita harasses nv aa te rode tate 312
Haslam v. Adams Exp. Co..... 104
ces v. Central G. E.R. RR.
Co.
Hathaway v. Fitchburg R. R.
COs seesh- shes fosn meses 375
Hathorn v. Pbyres ot stration da brace 130
Hattermann v. Siemann........ 325
Haug v. Rissner............... 305
PAGE
Haupt v. N. Y.C. & HR. R.
Re AS Oras aeeumuptasaacsie asks bod ate aye ave 304
Havens v. Erie R. R. Co....... 389
Hawkins v. Dutchess & O. S. S.
Con Serv eumatete sera GaKeee 452
Hawkins v. Hoffman........... 07
Hawkins v. Watkins........... 434
Hawks v. Winans.............. 34
Hawley v. City of Gloversville, 21y
Hawley v. Northern Central Ry.
CO. Seiesds omende sedis een as 265
Hawley v. Smith............... 20
Hawxhurst v. Mayor, etc., of
NGW “Y GEkKis tage eating oo beans
Hay v. Cohoes Co
Haycroft v. L. S. &'M. S. Ry.
CO. es sks doo aweeh behinds Bas 400
Hayden v. Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 13
Hayden & H. Co. v. N. Y. C. &
Ai RE RE Re Gwin tse saeseenanses Ig
Hayden v. Platt................ 288
Hayes v. Bush & Denslow Mfg.
COs. ides ais oiainals vo ecw sc age aoa 307
Hayes v. Consolidated Gas Co., 323
Hayes vi -Fayiewseve occa cantare 272
Hayes v. Forty-second St. &
Sty ORR. C Otc nase 76
Hayes v. Kedzie............... 16
Hayes v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R.
COn ei he aiteeker a cesiodd 62, 167
Hayes v. Phelan............... 31
Hayman v. Philadelphia & R. R.
FR GO rssosiaini gies gaeasecoserccsnaes 121
Hays v. Miller................. 357
Hays vi Mo6dy. oc cess is cenee os 247
Haywood v. N. Y. C. & H.R.
BR. SRE OO sia kl yatta ts clad sleet 303
Hazard v. Wellsy . 2.324 eccse80: 344
Hazman v. Hoboken L. & I.
He. be eeacse ts Gress ace ete 48
Heacock v. Sherman........... 187
-Heacock v. State of New York, 455
Headifen v. Cooper............ 309
Healey v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B.
Ri ORs (GOssvece sas enaienane cc 422
Healey v. Smith............... 278
Health Dept. v. Weekes....... 334
Health Dept. of N. Y. v.
DAaSSOfl a. cos da atauies ee aaeu.ed 334
Health Dept. v. Purdon........ 340
Healy v. Hart Bagging Co.... 307
Healy v. Mayor, etc, of New
YO hiev< kusowaoaaey dieaaeoe 213
Healy v. Ryan...... de-Gvieayiaiabs 252
Heaney v. Heeney............. 25
Heaney v. Long Island R. R.
yi ninie? lanl usenantp ce Gasen aretha 305
Heath v. Broadway & S. A. R.
TR sO) a 4 dectisssndnes pe, eocses toe Al
Heath v. os ee S. H. &
Ft. E. S. ¢ COs ax acces 57
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
PAGE
Heath v. Metropolitan Exp. Co., 245
Heather v. Hearn.............. 330
Heavey v. Hudson River W. P.
SEP COs ccs wanna ant attend 293
Hedges v. H. R. R. R. Co..... 114
Heeg v. Licht................. 351
Heenan v. N. Y., W. S. & B.
Rs (COs siencuemesiacern wietenaians 326
Heffernan v. Benkard.......... 352
Heffran v. Brooklyn Heights R.
Re SO ancient cdaaceee sesce agten conned 71
Hegan v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 417
Hegeman yv. Troy & B. R. R.
GOs. Sisiscdhcicas, seas pace nn porsua a eutenetoass 392
Hegeman v. Western R. R. Co., 58
Hegerich v. Keddie............ 322
Heidinger v. Hine............. 291
Heineman v. Grand Trunk Ry.
Oe oie ied iectidie seeaisnaitaecarecate 109
Heineman v. Heard........... 343
Heiner v. Heuvelman.......... 277
Heintze v. Mayor, etc., of New
York ig a nlap cst ae USO astag sole 217
2 COs vresceunntxs daemaetesce 431
Heiser v. Mayor, etc., of New
YEOTG srsv catch antstien gu aes a tdetiaiecd dca de 176
Helmrich v. Hart.............. 442
Hempenstall v. N. Y. C. & H.
Re Re Ree (CO esd senesae stain dos 80
Hempstead y, N. Y. C. R. R.
GOs ekieias Bolees: emcee keri 128
Henavie v. N.Y.C.& H.R. R.
RR: GO acai bona cyed cpanareen aes 405
Hee v. Knickerbocker Ice
ahaa, fig Rouse ais rere arsl ele ettecmece 445
Heatite v. Sixth Ave. R. R.
CG ecesitie Bans Syneiencscta sieeve 44
Henkel Vi MIPS ccsccSiers than aoracass 245
Hennessy v. Brooklyn City R.
Ri: Owes smeasiiny snus suale vents 395
Hennessy v. Northern Cent. Ry.
(COS circa ah y's ohalwen enero nee. vance 400
Henning v. Caldwell........... 393
Henry v. Brady................ 296
Henry v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.
FR SCO) cica's vrolemebinanteacerhetnidonines QI
Henry v. Staten Island Ry. Co., 319
Henshaw v. Rowland.......... 102
Hentz v. Long'Island R. R. Co., 332
Herbert v. Duryea............. 149
Herdman v. N. Y., L. E. & W.
R. R. Co.. 75
Herdt v. Rochester ‘City ‘& ‘B.
ei GIR GOR cosa dea aang ialeneCov a aoontens 69
Hermans v. N. a C.& H.R.
ROR: (GOnssscdadierec axenuee 393
Herrick v. Borst...............- 344
Herrington v. L. S. & M.S. Ry.
(COs vais eeaesesuldotastnnees 258
lit
PAGE
Herrington v. Village of Corn-
MATOS eis sees eee aidiow camemamates air
Herrington v. Village of Lans-
INS DULL ean ere rtavenmenimane 177
Herrington v. Village of
PINGEH ERS as ck, shed spaces Aicessenen wisn 169
Hershfield v. Adams........... 105
Heubach v. Rother............. 342
Heusner v. Houston, W. S. & P.
Fi ReOR, GO) wsecastaingeencans 83
Hewett v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co... 405
Hexamer v. Webb............. 182
Heyl v. Inman S. S. Line...... LII
He es N. Y. & E. R. Rz
AR saa ls Mics aes ere pee aaa ag 62
Hickenbottom v. D., L. & W. R.
Re, (CG iad nenwona cmarenca sie venstenehs 48
Hickey v. Morrell............. 2
Hickey v. N. Y.C. & H. R.R.
Re Cosa tiie sencos aide sacs dootasawies 399
Hickey v. Sylvan Lake O. & I.
CO sles higaontati cn sicerautre el cuceiteer tees 265
Hickey Vi Taal Oiasascce atone teesees 307
Hickok v. Trustees of Platts-
DUP Have ccterornarscieiaiea ices 194
Hicks v. Chaffee............... 172
Hicks v. Dorn................. 457
Higgins v. General Trans. Co.. 236
Higgins v. N. Y. & H. R. R.
COh a acta aa hao aueritianes 54
Higgins v. N.Y, L. E. & W.
RARE IG Os ss catssuu gan nea ieee aatics 201
Higgins v. Tefft............... 158
Higgins v. Village of Glens
Fal ls¥ sdiinsagswany once neater 216
Higgins v. Village of Sala-
TAM CAY a padee css sancs oustaushacnyiciaen 211
Higgins v. Watervliet T. Co... 64
Hee v. Western Union T.
jiacilluaidtsihusien al amsadig urate aanemetc 233
Higgins’ v. Whitson. . ... 165
Hildebrand v. Schenck......... 243
Hildreth v. City of Troy eee 205
HE So BOR yi casos. Dreecnancie atsanre 32
Hill v. Ninth Ave. R. R. Co.... 7o
Hill v. Schneider.............. 349
Hill v. Sheehan................ 440
Hill v. Supervisors of hee
LAST COS sna ciassisordanars amarertons , 134
Hill v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. Rg
RE PKC OF eens es solenstindi chsh aetna 110
Hiller v. Village of Sharon
SPHiit@sS) vce caierhcce ortiwanwni aie 212
Hillesum v. Mayor, etc., of New
MOP oe acsssasetreetaceoa evguravivast se wee 216
Hillis:-vs. Hines ecasiraasvne nce 305
Hilsenbeck v. Guhring......... 243
Hinchy v. Manhattan Ry. Co.. 382
Hinckley v. Emerson. . 6
Hinckley v. N. Y. C. & HERR.
Ry COvsgcdcdimnuadedananenes 126
liv
PAGE
Hinds v. Barton.............5. 357
Hine v. Cushing...... .... 242
Hinz vi, Statin... ..cccctsasessss 346
Hines v. City of Lockport..... 189
Hinkley v. Troy & A. H. R. R.
COe cece dpeveus ooh Comin en ee 420
Hirsch v. City of Buffalo...... 199
Hirsch v. N. Y. & Greenwood
Ls Rie COs ack Manan des 80
Hirschberg v. Dinsmore....... 106
Hirschshon v. Hamburg A. P.
COs capita ee eee ce wae eke
ees v. Brooklyn City Ry.
Meveeie os 8 aa eS WOO oe 39
oe v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.
Ria IG niga ed clents.caalg ataawls vs 387
Hoard v. Garner..............- 14
Hodge v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.
Rey CGicgeacs acerca da aieacadmaedand 376
Hoehmann v. Moss Engraving
COs sancweusnceaes ou is fee gat dees 267
Hoellerer v. Kaplan............ 17
Hoes v. Edison G. E. Co...... 284
Hoes v. Third Ave. R. R. Co.. 42
Hoey v. Gilroy. ...... 2.0... cee
Hoffman v. Conner............
Hoffman v. D. & H. C. Co.... 61
Hoffman v. Fitchburg R. R.Co 392
Henry Hoffman v. N, Y. C. &
A Re Re RiGee ae cias eee
John oe © N.Y. C. & H.
Re Re Re (C@uaawaiiiciasesmees 78
Hoffman vy. Schultz.. 338
Hoffman v. Union Ferry, Co... 451
Hoffnagle v. N. Y. C. -& H. R.
RR Ry CO wscisiscies shatewtree aces 28
Hogan v. Central P., N.& E.R.
Dia eM aoa ebewi she iea “Cn 8 Wile Koay tss aoe c
Hogan v. Field. ............... 207
Hogan v. Hendersen i (dase cartisldes 279
Hogan v. Smith. . 279
Hogle v. N. Y. C& Hi, RR.
Reo COsse2 sbacate teks tors anaes 382
Holbrook v. Utica & S. R. R.
EG. ma coca ay’ la soninas Varden Aastha BA New 69
Holcomb v. Town of champs: 190
Holden v. N. Y. 2 & H.R. R.
Ret Con cicas cpenietonaccx-san 6h 110
Holdridge v. lies & BL RR.
Ow k aerapntensade Ne ceacs dc 96
Holland v. Mayor, etc., of New
MOG iecioinccae aeranen Sones 34, 470
Hollenbeck v. Johnson.........
Hollender v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., ice
Hollister v. Bennett............ 163
Hollister v. Nowlen............ 98
Holloway v. City of Lockport... 211
Holmes v. Atlantic Ave. Ry.
Os aca tists avaudlavaseiabne ROR aN 430
Holmes v. Union Tel. & Tel.
COs: uh ae-abween A ee Ee eon ain es 228
TABLE OF CASES CITED.
Holsspale v. KR, W.& O. R, ri
SNe Re asd nanos ween oe II
Holt Wi IROSS acini
N.Y. 100: applied oS Barb. 343: dis. so Ham, jan
and 21 St. Rep. ons. and 3 Sz mes 220.
Hole in track.
Ciy of Brookivn v. Brooklyn City RL R. Ca.
4o7; 8 Abb. Pro N.S. 350: affd a7 N.
lowed 11 Hun, 3:5: whic h-eos aff'd =
applied S Hun, 370: applied 120 N.Y. 55
Rep. DR.
Heaped up snow overturned Sicigh.
City of Troy v. Troy & L. R. Ro Ca. 3 Lana ore: afd
ao N.Y. sr.
Drove into unguarded pile of sand m highway
City at Rochester v. Mortgemen. a Blan: Rog and m2
N.Y. ag: dist. 1253 N.Y. 416, and 34 S:. Rep =
Obstrection in *ghy ay.
Ci af Cohees v. Momson, 42 Hun, mie: 5 S. Rep
1s 25 Week, Xs. 355: aff o> M1. Rep. oS2. and
mie N.Y, oo2.
Hole in sidewalk.
City af Rochester v. ~ Campbell, 3s Hun, 138: 8 SN. Rep
1942 8 Sepr. 2592 afd & Ss. Rep, o>. aml 125 3. Y-
eo
Fell ovtr pipe im sidewalk.
Maver, ets. af New York v. Rrady, oa Jk Sues
Sr Rep. ioe:
Tis N.Y. S00 3
200: 77 Hem, 241; 50 Ss. Repo moss 28 Supp
Hun, 240: 93 St. Rep. ts0: 30 Supp. isis is
611.
INDEMNITY. 231
HIGHWAYS.
Towns.
Removing obstructions in highway.
People ex rel. Van Keuren v. Town Auditors of Esopus,
10 Hun, 551; 74 N. Y. 310.
Bridge; highway commissioner.
People ex rel. Loomis v. Town Auditors of Little Val-
ley, 75 N. Y. 316; dist. 110 N. Y. 237, and 18 St.
Rep. 107.
Villages.
Plank sidewalk defective.
Village of Fulton v. Tucker, 3 Hun, 529; applied 123
N. Y. 416, and 34 St. Rep. 77.
Obstruction in street. :
Village of Seneca Falls v. Zalinski, 8 Hun, 571; dist.
50 Hun, 585, and 20 St. Rep. 422, and 3 Supp. 595.
Excavation in street not properly guarded.
Village of Port Jervis v. First Nat. Bank, 31 Hun, 107;
96 N. Y. 550; applied 57 Hun, 74, and 32 St. Rep. 5,
and 10 Supp. 278; dist. 123 N. Y. 416, and 34 St. Rep.
77; dist. 50 Hun, 585, and 20 St. Rep. 422, and 3
Supp. 595.
Pole in street.
Village of Geneva v. Brush Electric Co., 50 Hun, 581,
20 St. Rep. 424; 3 Supp. 595; 28 St. Rep. 284; 8
Supp. 203; aff’d 41 St. Rep. 952, and 130 N. Y. 670.
Loose grating in sidewalk.
Trustees of Canandaigua v. Foster, 81 Hun, 147; 62
St. Rep. 639; 30 Supp. 686.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Conductor was sued for ejection.
Howe v. Buffalo, N. Y. & E. R. R. Co., 38 Barb. 124;
aff'd.37 N. Y. 297; dist. 45 N. Y. 268; dist. ro Hun,
551; 4 Trans. App. 249.
Plaintiff hired defendant as contractor to repair a roof. Plain-
tiff was a landlord and paid tenant damages for a storm; for
which damages he sued the contractor.
Maloney v. Brady, 38 St. Rep. 803; 14 Supp. 794.
232 INDEMNITY.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Hit by locomotive.
Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Cornell, 54 Hun, 292; 27 St. Rep.
300; 7 Supp. 557; aff'd 130 N. Y. 637.
Door of wharf fell. ‘
Oceanic S. N. Co. v. Campania T. E., 26 J. & S. 425;
34 St. Rep. 153; 11 Supp. 728; rev. 29 Abb. N. C.
238, and 47 St. Rep. 472, and 134 N. Y. 461; 4 Misc.
426; 53 St. Rep. 662; 23 Supp. 1163; aff’d 71 St. Rep.
303, and 144 N. Y. 663.
Bond.
Latimer v. Veader, 20 App. Div. 418.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.
CONVICTS.
Defendant was convict contractor. Convict left elevator shaft
open. Servant of a contractor to repair building stepped
into shaft.
Cunningham v. Bay State S. & L. Co., 25 Hun, 210; 93
N. Y. 481.
Prisoner’s hand cut off by circular saw.
Alamango v. Supervisors of Albany Co., 25 Hun, 551.
Prisoner injured by molten iron from defective ladle.
Lewis v. State of New York, 96 N. Y. 71.
Finger smashed in roller.
Hartwig: v. Bay State Shoe & L. Co., 43 Hun, 425; 6
St. Rep. 712; 26 Week. Dig. 322; rev. 2 Silv. 437, and
27 St. Rep. 954, and 118 N. Y. 664.
e ELEVATORS.
Servant of contractor to do work for defendant. In elevator;
rope broke.
Barrett v. Singer Mfg. Co., 1 Sweeny, 545.
Defendant furnished elevator and engineer, but had builder
contractor. Plaintiff was servant of sub-contractor. Engi-
neer’s foot slipped from brake and elevator fell on plaintiff.
Gerlach v. Edelmeyer, 88 N. Y. 645; aff'd 15 J. & S.
292; dist. 14 Daly, 50, and 3 St. Rep. 604.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. 233
ELEVATORS.
Four elevators nearly finished in building being constructed,
but no side panels. Servant of independent contractor had
his elbow crushed; it projected through side.
Ferris v. Aldrich, 35 St. Rep. 945; 12 Supp. 482; 47 St.
Rep. 40; 19 Supp. 353.
Defendant furnished man to run elevator; servant of con-
tractor to repair building was using elevator as scaffold,
when it was started suddenly, and plaintiff fell over.
Higgins v. Western Union T. Co., 8 Misc. 433; 58 St.
Rep. 852; 28 Supp. 676; 11 Misc. 32; 63 St. Rep.
445; 31 Supp. 841.
Iron works to reconstruct elevator. One elevator run by
company during the work. Servant of iron works hit by
descending elevator without warning.
Schmitt v. Metropolitan L. I. Co., 13 App. Div. 120;
77 St. Rep. 318; 43 Supp. 318.
Engineer of building injured by carelessness of elevator in-
spector.
McHale v. Fidelity & C. Co., 14 App. Div. 286; 77 St.
Rep. 894; 43 Supp. 894.
Servant of carpenter contractor to repair defendant’s hotel
used elevator as scaffold. Elevator man started suddenly.
Jossaers v. Walker, 14 App. Div. 303; 77 St. Rep. 891;
43 Supp. 891; 24 App. Div. 38.
Servant of contractor of defendant built scaffold in elevator
shaft; placed planks through loop suspended below elevator.
Elevator operator told not to go down; he did not know of
this construction; went up and tore up scaffold with plaintiff.
Simpson v. Gerken, 19 App. Div. 68; 79 St. Rep. 1100;
45 Supp. 1100.
FALLING THINGS.
Constructing buildings. ;
Servant of iron work contractor on building hit by brick which
fell from bricklayers of mason contractor.
Guldseth v. Carlin, 19 App. Div. 588.
Derrick of stone mason fell on plaintiff doing the asphalt work.
Murphy v. McWilliam, 15 Misc. 122; 71 St. Rep. 522;
36 Supp. 492; 14 App. Div. 300; 77 St. Rep. 937; 43
Supp. 937.
234 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.
FALLING THINGS.
Constructing buildings.
Building being constructed. Brick fell on servant of inde-
pendent contractor as servants of defendant were moving
derrick near pile.
Reilly v. Atlas Iron C. Co., 83 Hun, 196; 64 St. Rep,
331; 31 Supp. 618; 3 App. Div. 363; 73 St. Rep. 641;
38 Supp. 485.
Servant of terra cotta contractor on building hit by brick; sued
mason contractor.
Dolm v. Dawson, 84 Hun, 110; 65 St. Rep. 221; 32
Supp. 59; 90 Hun, 271; 70 St. Rep. 608; 35 Supp.
984.
Laborer putting in coal in building in process of construction
hit by elevator falling as he was passing under it.
Rich v. Pelham Hod El. Co., aa App. Div. 246.
Unloading vessels.
Servant of lighterman hit by bale thrown without warning.
Svenson v. Atlantic Mail S. S. Co., 1 J. & S. 277; aff'd
57 N. Y. 108; dist. 44 Hun, 310, and 7 St. Rep. 627,
and 12 Civ. Pro. 301.
Plaintiff was owner of canal boat. Defendant’s servants were
unloading it; bucket fell and damaged boat.
Edwards v. Jones, 67 How. Pr. 177; 12 Daly, 415.
Plaintiff owned lighter; stevedore was unloading it; hook
broke and barrel fell on plaintiff.
Vanderwald v. Olsen, 1 St. Rep. 506.
Loading bale of cotton; fell on longshoreman.
Courtney v. Baker, 3 Den. 27; 2 J. & S. 529; 5 J.&S.
249; appeal dismissed 60 N. Y. 1; explained 41 St.
Rep. 345, and 16 Supp. 518.
Longshoreman hit by block; unloading tackle broke.
Le v. Barrow S. S. Co., 6 St. Rep. 285; 14 Daly, 230.
Servant of stevedore hit by boxes in sling lowered too rapidly.
Defendant leased engine to hoist.
Coyle v. Pierrepont, 33 Hun, 311; 37 Hun, 379.
Defendants were warehousemen; vessel unloading at their
stores. Defendants contracted for horses to truck; con-
tractor sent plaintiff and horse to them. Hit by barrel
thrown from defective truck.
Brophy v. Bartlett, 13 St. Rep. 490; 37 Hun, 642; 1
Silv. 632; 28 Week. Dig. 217; 108 N. Y. 632.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. 235
FALLING THINGS.
Unloading vessels.
Sailor sweeping deck; vessel loading at elevator; block fell;
clamp loosened or beam unsound. Sued elevator man.
Minor v. Clark, 28 St. Rep. 184; 8 Supp. 616.
Ship to furnish ropes for contractor to paint vessel; try-sail
vang fell on servant of contractor.
Nugent v. Atlas S. S. Co., 51 Hun, 306; 21 St. Rep.
761; 3 Supp. 861; 40 St. Rep. 927; 16 Supp. 66.
Defendant furnished hoisting apparatus. Barrel swung against
servant of stevedore unloading vessel and knocked him into
hold.
Sanford v. Standard Oil Co., 29 St. Rep. 855; 118 N. Y.
571; see 132 N. Y. 570.
Defendant furnished winch and man; servant of stevedore un-
loading vessel caught fingers in drum.
Johnson v. Netherlands A. S. N. Co., 32 St. Rep. 916;
10 Supp. 927; aff’d 43 St. Rep. 783, and 132 N. Y.
576.
Servant of stevedore unloading boat hit by tackle from falling
derrick.
Kilroy v. D. & H. C. Co., 24 J. & S. 138; 16 St. Rep.
373; 1 Supp. 779; 28 Week. Dig. 545; aff’d 30 St.
Rep. 724, and 121 N. Y. 22.
Servant of stevedore unloading defendants* vessel. Spar gave
way. rope broke, fell on plaintiff.
Mason v. Tower Hill Co., 83 Hun, 479; 65 St. Rep.
192; 32 Supp. 36. :
Scooper unloading grain. Deck hand of vessel let timber drop
in hatch on him.
Kane v. Mitchell Trans. Co., 90 Hun, 65; 70 St. Rep.
203; 35 Supp. 581; aff'd 153 N. Y. 680.
Unclassified.
Deiendant had contractor to build iron bridge; defendant to
take down wooden bridge. While working on iron part,
servant of contractor hit by timber from wooden bridge.
Randolph v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 5 Week. Dig. 150;
affd 74 N. Y. 608.
Hit by something while at work on pier: sued master of two
workmen who were on the pier.
Harrigan v. Donegan, 1 Supp. 329.
2306 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS,
FALLING THINGS.
Unclassified.
Maing? repairing boiler hit hy stiek of wood,
Kemey ve Qeean SoS. Con 33 S56 Kep.o8e. re Sapp.
fle.
Defendant furnished derrick to contractors rape hnoke snd if
fell on servant of contractor,
Davies vo Vetham Tlod fb Co. 05 [hin 6734 48 St. Rep,
5903 20 Supp. 523,
Stage direetress of one playing at Cheatre bit by batten let fall
from flies by Hyman of defendant,
Currier v, Tlenderson, 85 Phun, 300; 00080, Rep. gkyy ge
Supp, 953.
Defendant was putting in cleetrie lights in brewery; caller fell
on servant of brewery,
Burk v. Iedison G. 9. Co, &y Phun, 4%.
Defendants were Duilding sewer and damping dirt between
street RL OR. tracks. Servant of RR. company employed to
keep tracks clear of derrick boom, hit by boom when derrick
fell,
Welsh vy. Murray, 2 App. Div. 205; 72 St. Key, Bos; 47
Supp. BK2,
Building fell; sued owner,
Piteher v, Lennon, 12 App, Div. 3505 70 St, Rep, 150;
42 Sipp. 150; 10 Mise, Gog; 74 St. Weep. 8975 38 cpp,
1007,
Truckman unloaded heavy cane npon defendant, whi was a
weigher on dock,
Howe y. Toor & Venwe Co, 20 Mine, 3485 7 vt
Kop. 4055 45 Supp. 805,
. FALLS.
Into places.
Servant of levator man fell down hatciway of vessel Je was
unloading.
Higgins v. General Trans, Co, 18 Week, Dig, 254,
Lony-choreman assisting in unloading versed fell inte dark
hatchway.
Tully vi NOY. & Vera SS. C0, 160 App, Div, 6357
St. Vey. 2y5 42 Supp, ay.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS, 237
FALLS.
With scaffold, etc.
Vefendant had contractor to repair vessel; he built staging.
It fell with servant of contractor.
Cook v. Dry Dock Co., 1 Hilt. 436; 18 N. Y. 229.
Plaintiff made contract with defendant tu trim stunce work of
building; defendant tv furnish scaffold. It fell with plain-
tiff ; cornice was rotten,
Matthes v. Kerrigan, 2) J. & S. 431.
Plaintiff was servant of sub-contractor of defendant. Church,
who employed defendant, furnished a scaffold, which fell
with plaintiff.
Ditberner v. Rodgers, 13 Abb. N. C. 436; 66 How. Pr.
35-
Scaffold furnished by defendant to contractor tv put up cor-
nice. Scaffold fell with servant of contractor.
Coughtry v. Globe Woolen Co., 1 1. & C. 452; rev. 56
N. Y. 124; applied 4 Hun, 163; followed 15 J. & S.
298; applied 4 Hun, 771; which was rev. 66 N. Y.
181; applied 13 J. & S. 348; dist. 25 Hun, 163.
Contractor to do mason work. Ste was to build his scaffold,
but used scaffold Jeft ly carpenters, which fell with his
servant.
Larock v. O. & LC. RR. Co., 26 Hun, 382.
Owner of adjoining buildings employed defendant J. to repair
one, and defendants B. & M. to repair other. Servant of
I}. & M. got.on I's scaffold without his permission to re-
ceive joist; scaffold fell and killed him.
Mauer v. lerguson, 13, & M., 44 St. Rep. 372; 17 Supp.
349.
Defendant had contractor to erect chimney; he erected a seaf-
fold, which fell with his servant on it.
Judson v, Village of Olean, go Jfiun, 158; rev. 2 Silv.
414, and 26 St. Rep. 706, and 116 N. Y. 655; 41 Hun,
637.
Mason fell on stairs which defendant was putting in building;
temporary treads defective.
Barker v. Paulson, 21 J. & S. 542; 27 St. Rep. 546; 2
Sil. 444; 116 N. Y. 660.
F, was contractor for building; S. was sub-contractor for car-
238 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS.
FALLS.
From scaffold, ete.
penter work, Servant of I. was carrying brick to attic,
when floor broke with him on aecount of defective tie beam,
Wittenberg v. lrederich & S. 8 App. Div. 433; 40
Supp. &g5.
Same accident,
Wittenberg v, Seitz & 1, 8 App. Div. 43g; 40 Supp.
Ryo.
Serviuil of painter contractor attached scaffold to window bars
of warehouse; bar came out and seaffold fell with plaintiff,
Wendler v. Mquitahle 1. A. Soe, 2 App. Div. 105 72
St. Rep. 4gg; 37 Supp. 4145 9 App. Div. 30; 79 St.
Rep. 806; 45 Supp. 866.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Wall fell and threw independent contractor ott of work,
Treadwell vy. Mayor, cle. of New York, § Daly, 123.
Defendant employed plumber to work, whose negligence in-
jured plaintiff.
Seamon v, Carroll, ¢ Robo CoC. 350.
Servant of comtractor to repair boilers overcome by foul gas.
Curran vy. Warren Chemical Co., 36 N. ¥. 1533 34 How.
; Pr. 250; 3 Abb. I'r. N.S, 2qo.
Deceased was a civil cngincer working for Water Commission=
ers, Defendant was contractor to dig tunnel at Croton
Dam. Killed while riding on car bringing ap material,
Morris v. Brown, 4 St. Rep. 832; 25 Week. Digs. 507;
rev. (9 St. Rep, 355, and ron N.Y. 308,
Wall blew down and injured property; one independent con-
tractor sued another,
Pasquini vy, Lowry, 44 St. Rep. 330; 18 Supp. 284. .
Digging s€wer; bank caved in, One employee sued another.
Burns vi Vetheal, 75 Ifun, 437; 57 St. Rep, 661; 27
Supp. 4gg.
Servant of contractor hired to keep boys away; chased boy,
who ran on track and was run over; sued contractor.
Kaiser v. McLean, 20 App. Div. 326.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 239
LANDLORD AND TENANT.
ELEVATORS AND DUMB WAITERS.
Dumb waiter fell on plaintiff ; rope broke.
Blake v. Fox, 43 St. Rep. 527; 17 Supp. 508.
Tenant let elevator down without regulating its speed by check
rope, and damaged elevator.
Church v. Murphy, 20 Misc. 112; 79 St. Rep. 73; 45
Supp. 73.
® EXPLOSIONS.
Kitchen boiler exploded ; sued owner, who had leased premises.
Jaffe v. Harteau, 14 Abb. Pr. N. S. 363; aff'd 56 N. Y-
398; applied 115 N. Y. 219, and 26 St. Rep. 295; dist.
55 Hun, 212, and 27 St. Rep. 806, and 8 Supp. 51;
explained 15 Daly, 208, and 23 St. Rep..go, and 4
Supp. 556.
Gas exploded.
Kimmell v. Burfeind, 2 Daly, 155.
Boiler exploded.
Perkins v. Eighme, 24 St. Rep. 728; 6 Supp. 156; 2 Sil.
S. C. 497; aff'd 125 N. Y. 706.
FALLING THINGS.
Buildings and walls.
Repairs caused building to fall.
Butler v. Cushing, 46 Hun, 521; 12 St. Rep. 610; re-
argument denied 15 St. Rep. 903, and 2 Supp. 39.
Building fell.
‘ Bold v. O’Brien, 17 Week. Dig. 466; 12 Daly, 161;
Daily Reg., Oct. 31, 1882; criticised 24 J. & S. 410,
and 7 St. Rep. 55; dist. 49 Hun, 231, and 17 St. Rep.
36, and 1 Supp. 633, and 28 Week. Dig. 568.
Ceilings.
Plaster fell.
Dollard v. Roberts, 28 St. Rep. 569; 8 Supp. 432; afi’d
41 St. Rep. 253, and 130 N. Y. 269.
Ceiling fell.
Kabus v. Frost, 18 J. & S. 72.
240 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
FALLING THINGS.
Ceilings.
Ceiling fell.
Franz v. Mulligan, 18 Misc. 411; 76 St. Rep. 509; 42
Supp. 509.
Ceiling fell.
Fitzgerald v. Timony, 13 Misc. 327; 68 St. Rep. 364;
34 Supp. 460.
Ceiling fell.
Kapinsky v. Hallo, 3 Misc. 623; 52 St. Rep. 265; 23
Supp. 114.
Ceiling fell.
Schanda v. Sulzberger, 7 App. Div. 221; 40 Supp. 116.
Ceiling fell on child.
Miller v. Rinaldo, 20 Misc. 714; 21 Misc. 470.
Ceiling fell.
Schwartz v. Apple, 21 Misc. 513.
Piazzas, platforms, etc.
Bridge to shed defective.
Brennan v. Ellis, 70 Hun, 472; 53 St. Rep. 624; 24
Supp. 426.
Piazza fell.
O’Brien v. Capwell, 59 Barb. 497; applied 118 N. Y.
116, and 27 St. Rep. 955.
Stoop fell with plaintiff.
Dowd v. Fitzpatrick, 18 Week. Dig. 343.
Stable floors.
Leg of horse through rotten fioor.
Johnson v. Dixon, 1 Daly, 178; explained 15 Daly, 208,
and 23 St. Rep. go, and 4 Supp. 556; criticised 43
How. Pr. 333.
Horse fell through rotten floor.
Lynch v. Speed, 23 St. Rep. 90; 4 Supp. 556; 15 Daly,
207.
Unclassified.
Clothes pole fell on infant in yard.
Lenz v. Aldrich, 6 App. Div. 178; 39 Supp. 1022.
Iron shutter fell into yard.
Stirker v. Plath, 19 App. Div. 376.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 241
FALLING THINGS.
Unclassified.
Flagstone fell on child.
Schmidt v. Cook, 1 Misc. 227; 49 St. Rep. 213; 20
Supp. 889; rev. 4 Misc. 85, and 53 St. Rep. 84, and
23 Supp. 799, and 30 Abb. N. C. 285; 10 Misc. 787;
63 St. Rep. 875; 30 Supp. 1135; aff'd 12 Misc. 449,
and 67 St. Rep. 330, and 33 Supp. 624.
FALLS.
From piazzas, platforms and walks.
Child fell from unrepaired piazza.
Flynn v. Hatton, 43 How. Pr. 333; 4 Daly, 552; ex-
plained 15 Daly, 208, and 23 St. Rep. go, and 4 Supp.
556.
Child fell off unguarded piazza.
Donner v. Ogilvie, 49 Hun, 229; 17 St. Rep. 36; 1
Supp. 633; 28 Week. Dig. 268; explained 15 Daly,
208, and 23 St. Rep. go, and 4 Supp. 556.
Infant fell from walk at second floor going to privy.
Williams v. Gardiner, 58 Hun, 508; 35 St. Rep. 796; 12
Supp. 612. !
Into shafts and hatchways.
Fell into hatchway.
Atkinson v. Abraham, 45 Hun, 238; ro St. Rep. 342.
Elevator door open; dark; no elevator; fell down.
Davidson v. Sloan, 17 J. & S. 304.
Leaned on elevator chain to give signal; it broke and he fell
into shaft.
Knox v. Hall Steam Power Co., 69 Hun, 231; 53 St.
Rep. 39; 23 Supp. 490; 30 Abb. N. C. 152.
Fell into hatchway.
Totten v. Phipps, 52 N. Y. 354; dist. 9g Daly, 41; dist.
18 Week. Dig. 404; dist. 10 Daly, 336.
Fell into elevator shaft.
Tousey v. Roberts, 21 J. & S. 446; aff'd 23 St. Rep.
223, and 114 N. Y. 312.
Unclassified.
Down open cellar stairs ; dark.
Jucht v. Behrens, 26 St. Rep. 690; 7 Supp. 195.
[x6]
242 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
FALLS.
Unclassified.
Boy fell through trap door of fire escape.
McAlpin v. Powell, 1 Abb. N.C. 427: rev. 70 N.Y.
126; 55 How. Pr. 163: approved @ Abb. N.C. a7;
followed 104 N.Y. 477, and 5 St. Rep. 707, and 26
Week. Dig. 64; harmonized 12 St. Rep. 05.
Boy fell from window upon skylight.
Miller v. Woodhead, 104 N. Y. 471; 22 Week. Dig. 28;
5 St. Rep. 797; 26 Week. Dig. 64: 52 lun, 127; 23
St. Rep. 412: 5 Supp. 88; 17 Civ. Pro. 102.
FIRES.
Lessor entered tenant’s house: tenant away: fire soon after.
Lansing v. Stone, 37 Barb. 15; 14 Abb. Pr. 199.
Fire spread from next building.
Hine v. Cushing, 53 Hun, 519; 24 St.. Rep. 778; 6 Supp.
850.
Fire; building fell.
Judd C6. v. Cushing, 50 Hun, 181; 19 St. Rep. 722;
2 Supp. 836; 22 Abb. N. C. 358.
No fire escape.
Willy v. Mulledy, 6 Abb. N. C. 97; aff'd 78 N.Y. 310:
dist. 58 Hun, 383, and 34 St. Rep. 8y5, and 12 Supp.
188; dist. 28 Abb. N. C. 141, and 45 St. Rep. 285, and
18 Supp. 106; followed 131 N. Y. 96, and 42 St. Rep.
636; dist. 34 N. Y. 527; criticised 89 N. Y. 308.
ROOF LEAKED.
Defendant owned two buildings; had contractor take down
one; rain came through side wall.
Rotter v. Goerlitz, 34 St. Rep. 1001; 16 Daly, 484; 12
Supp. 210.
Repairimg roof for new tenant; leaked on old tenant.
McVie v. McNaughton, 21 Week. Dig. 89.
Leaky roof; sued for sickness.
Ischbach v. Hughes, 7 Misc. 172; 57 St. Rep. 550; 27
Supp. 320.
Roof leaked; did not repair according to agreement.
Phillips v. Ehrman, 4 Misc. 285; 53 St. Rep. 331: 23
Supp. 1030; 8 Misc. 39; 59 St. Rep. 386; 28 Supp.
619.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 243
ROOF LEAKED.
Roof leaked; did not repair according to agreement.
Rauth v. Davenport, 60 Hun, 70; 37 St. Rep. 664; 1
Supp. 69; 45 St. Rep. 926; 18 Supp. 721.
Repairing roof; it leaked.
Sulzbacher v. Dickie, 41 How. Pr. 500; % Daly, 469;
followed 45 St. Rep. 864, and 18 Supp. 757.
Leaky roof.
* Woodard v. Jones, 15 Misc. 1; 72 St. Rep. 4; 36 Supp.
775-
Did not repair roof after fire.
Doupe v. Genin, 1 Sw. 25; 37 How. Pr. 5; aff'd 45 N.Y.
119; dist. 60 Hun, 72, and 37 St. Rep. 664, and 14
Supp. 69; followed 22 J. & S. 409, and 7 St. Rep. 55;
dist. 29 Hun, 537; approved 16 Week. Dig. 159.
STAIRS AND HALLS.
Coverings defective.
Hole in mat in hall.
Neyer v. Miller, 19 J. & S. 516.
Hole in oilcloth on stairway.
Palmer v. Dearing, 93 N. Y. 7; applied 130 N. Y. 274,
and 41 St. Rep. 253; applied 39 St. Rep. 659, and 15
Supp. 410; dist. 23 J. & S. 138, and 11 St. Rep. 725,
and 27 Week. Dig. 335; dist. 4 N. Y. Crim. 268.
Hole in carpet of stairway.
Peil v. Reinhart, 38 St. Rep. 913; 127 N. Y. 381.
Tripped on mat.
McCabe v. Kastens, 10 Misc. 42; 63 St. Rep.-180; 30
Supp. 832; aff’d 11 Misc. 272, and 65 St. Rep. 430,
and 32 Supp. 249.
Lighting.
Unlighted stairs.
Hildebrand v. Schenck, 2 City Ct. 249.
Unlighted stairs; no guard rail.
Halpin v. Townsend, 2 City Ct. 417; 107 N. Y. 683.
Hall not lighted.
Hilsenbeck v. Guhring, 36 St. Rep. 452; 12 Supp. 792;
39 St. Rep. 460; 15 Supp. 162; rev. 43 St. Rep. 936,
and 131 N. Y. 674.
244 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
STAIRS AND HALLS.
Lighting.
Hall not lighted.
Muller v. Minken, 5 Misc. ; 26 Supp. 8o1.
Wood on unlighted stairs.
Gorman v. White, 19 App. Diy. 324.
Stairs falling.
Stairs fell.
Ackerly v. White, 58 Hun, 362; 34 St. Rep. 633.
Stairs: fell with plaintiff.
Spellman v. Bannigan, 36 Hun, 174.
Stairway fell.
Sanders v. Smith, 5 Misc. 1; 25 Supp. 125.
Steps gone.
Step of stairway gone; plaintiff fell.
Donahue v. Kendall, 18 J. & S. 386; 98 N. Y. 635.
Broken stair.
Feinstein v. Jacobs, 15 Misc. 474; 72 St. Rep. 698; 37
Supp. 345.
Building ; open stairs.
Rouleston v. Clark, 3 E. D. Smith, 366.
Unclassified.
Dress caught on ragged edge of stair.
Brennan v. Lachet, 5 St. Rep. 882; aff’d 6 St. Rep. 278,
and 14 Daly, 197.
Caught loose rung of banister and infant fell down.
O’Neill v. Kinken, 29 St. Rep. 372; 8 Supp. 554; aff’d
125 N. Y. 733.
a stairs wet from leaky water closet.
alton v. Kane, 4 Misc. 296; 53 St. Rep. 429; 23 Supp.
1029.
Protrudihg nail on stairs.
Idel v. Mitchell, 5 App. Div. 268; 39 Supp. 1.
Defendant had contractor to do tiling in hall of tenement.
Plaintiff hit leg on beam left to protect tile.
Mahon v. Burns, 9 Misc. 223; 60 St. Rep. 840; 29 Supp.
682; aff'd 13 Misc. 19, and 68 St. Rep. 101, and 34
Supp. 9I.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 245
_ VISITORS TO TENANT.
rap-door in hall open; poor light; fell down.
Kaiser v. Hirth, 4 J. & S. 344; 46 How. Pr. 161.
Ice and snow in passageway to house.
Harkin v. Crumbie, 14 Misc. 439; 70 St. Rep. 731; 20
Misc. 169; 35 Supp. 1027; 20 Misc. 568.
Caught foot in rubber of stairs.
Monteith v. Finkbeiner, 50 St. Rep.-453; 21 Supp. 288.
Defective banister.
Brady v. Valentine, 3 Misc. 20; 50 St. Rep. 570; 21 -
Supp. 776.
Stairs not lighted; fell on last step.
O'Sullivan v. Norwood, 8 St. Rep. 388; 14 Daly, 286.
Heel caught in hole in oilcloth on stairs.
Henkel v. Murr, 31 Hun, 28; approved 55 Hun, 212,
and 27 St. Rep. 806, and 8 Supp. 51.
Stoop broke.
Sterger v. Van Sicklen, 28 St. Rep. 627; 7 Supp. &05;
aff’d 44 St. Rep. 863, and 132 N. Y. 499.
Visitor at club which leased premises of defendant, slipped on
slat work and fell through glass door.
Heath v. Metropolitan Ex. Co., 33 St. Rep. 828; 11
Supp. 357.
Fell into elevator shaft.
Egan v. Berkshire Apartment Assn., 31 St. Rep. 545;
10 Supp. 116; 16 Daly, 218.
Stairs defective.
Gleeson v. Brummer, 87 Hun, 465; 68 St. Rep. 454; 34
Supp. 375; aff'd 152 N. Y. 653.
WATER FLOODED LOWER FLOOR.
Flooded lower floor.
Robbins v. Mount, 55 Hun, 80; 28 St. Rep. 472; 8
Supp. 388; 33 How. Pr. 24; 4 Robt. 553; dist. ro
Hun, 560; followed 4 J. & S. 344.
Oil leaked through.
Stapenhorst v. American Mfg. Co., 15 Abb. Pr. N. S.
355; 46 How. Pr. 510; 4 J. & S. 392; dist. 22 J. & S.
4o8, and 7 St. Rep. 55.
Repairing pipe destroyed books.
Worthington v. Parker, 11 Daly, 545; dist. 22 J. & S.
408, and 7 St. Rep. 55.
Faucet left open.
—K roecer_u_locanbe—DeileDo=—pt. 17, 1881.
246
LANDLORD AND TENANT.
WATER FLOODED LOWER FLOOR.
Tenant failed to shut off stop cock.
Clark v. Anderson, 2 City Ct. 229; 33 St. Rep. 866; 11
Supp. 729.
Sued owner for overflow after repaifs.
- Zenner v. Newman, 2 City Ct. 310.
Defective pipes.
Vann v. Rouse, 94 N. Y. 401; applied 60 Hun, 73, and
37 St. Rep. 664, and 14 Supp. 69; dist. 22 J. & S.
410, and 7 St. Rep. 55; followed 37 St. Rep. 313, and
15 Supp. 107.
Flooded lower floor.
Shugio v. Hunting, 9 St. Rep. 286.
Flooded lower floor.
Murray v. Archer, 24 St. Rep. 817; 1 Silv. S. C. 366; 5
Supp. 326.
YARDS AND APPROACHES.
Approaches to boarding house.
Fiske v. Bailey, 51 N. Y. 150; applied 9 J. & S. 84.
Child in yard fell through cellar door.
i Canavan v. Stuyvesant, 7 Misc. 113; 57 St. Rep. 513;
27 Supp. 413; 12 Misc. 74; 66 St. Rep. 687; 33 Supp.
53-
Defective walk.
O'Dwyer v. O’Brien, 13 App. Div. 570; 77 St. Rep.
815; 43 Supp. 815.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Escape of steam.
Reiss v. N. Y. Steam Co., 27 J. & S. 57; 35 St. Rep. 86;
@? Supp. 557; rev. 38 St. Rep. 842, and 128 N. Y.
03; dist. 44 St. Rep. 342, and 8 Supp. 284.
Landlord cleaning chimney; soot fell and child died from in-
halation.
O'Connor v. Schuepel, 12 Misc. 356; 67 St. Rep. 352;
33 Supp. 562.
Water pipe burst.
Simons v. Seward, 22 J. & S. 406; 7 St. Rep. 55.
Landlord negligently made repairs during lease.
Turner v. McCarthy, 4 E. D. Smith, 247.
LANDLORD AND ‘TENANT. 247
UNCLASSIFIED.
Chimney fell and injured tenant’s property.
Eagle v. Swayze, 2 Daly, 140.
Tenant refused access to landlord to shore up, and wall dam-
aged.
McKenzie v. Hatton, 70 Hun, 142; 53 St. Rep. 776; 24
Supp. 88; aff'd 56 St. Rep. 489, and 141 N. Y. 6; 15
Misc. 105; 71 St. Rep. 439; 36 Supp. 775.
Deleterious gases in tenement caused illness of children.
Victory v. Krauss, 41 Hun, 533; 4 St. Rep. 33.
Horses cut on wire fence.
Roney v. Aldrich, 44 Hun, 320; 7 St. Rep. 669.
Hanging clothes on roof; slat broke.
Alperin v. Earle, 55 Hun, 211; 27 St. Rep. 806; 8 Supp.
51.
Counterclaim of bad sewage.
Chadwick v. Woodard, 1 City Ct. Supp. 94; 13 Abb.
N.C. 441; 12 Daly, 399; approved 2 Supp. 389.
Caught in shafting. Plaintiff in employ of tenant of defendant.
Ryan v. Wilson, 13 Week. Dig. 513; 13 J. & S. 273; 63
How. Pr. 172; 87 N. Y. 471.
Permissive waste must be shown to be negligent.
Beckman v. Van Dolsen, 63 Hun, 487; 45 St. Rep. 340;
18 Supp. 376; 70 Hun, 288; 53 St. Rep. 768; 24 Supp.
414.
Let small-pox infected house.
Cesar v. Karutz, 60 N. Y. 229.
Counterclaim of defective drainage.
Hays v. Moody, 2 Supp. 385.
Heat from boiler.
Dickinson v. Vanderpoll, 2 Hun, 626.
Negligently removed property of tenant.
Jansen v. Bernard, 12 Week. Dig. 499.
Landlord sued tenant for overloading floor, which fell.
Haas v. Brown, 20 Misc. 672; 21 Misc. 434.
f
248 MANUPACIUYERS.
MANUPACTLCRERS.
Wheel burst.
Loop v. Litchfield, 42 N. Y. 351; applied 55 livn, 196,
and z7 St. Kep. gt, and 7 Supp. S21; dist. 52 St, Ye
124.
Delivering ice. Platiorm oi market fell; action against Uclder
A platiormm.
Swan w. Jackson, == Hun, 194; 27 <1. Kep. ygi; 7 Supp.
821.
Water irom sprinkler system.
Butts v. Mackey Co., 72 Hun, 362; == St. Rep. 137; 25
Supp. 531-
Mitolek AA SERVAN fT.
ASSISTING SERVANT.
Trackmatter of dciendam got man to scraps tracks; promised
to wern him; did not and he wae ran over.
Dradley vw N.Y. C&hH RRR Co., 3 T.&C. ZEB;
aff'd 62 N.Y. yg.
Infant intended +o be a pazsenyger. Urererren sem Lice up the
track fur wets; locomotive r200 over Lisn.
Corcoran vy. N.Y. EL RR. Go... 1g Her xB.
Outside: atbed ty 252i servant: sank of winch Upped off, ht
Boor, Lroke, and a piece hit plaintiff.
Radmar w. i eas aoe IF St. Kep. 497; 1 Supp. 1;
wis es
Patenger helpec
aha way,
Stavtney v. Second Ave. R. RCo. MS. Vey 23758
ce
Supp. $0032: S+. Rep. yoe: 138 NY. Sen,
Een on er pon request of moturran ty torr switelas ior7e
on Wearing.
Finlex wv. Hudson Elecrie ¥ Co. 6a Hee 373: cs “1
Fe. coz; iy Supp. 621; aff'd 146 X.Y. Hg;
Rep. 4 G7 -
MASTER AND SERVANT. 249)
ASSISTING SERVANT.
Driver called to infant to drive while hitching horse to rear of
car; boys jumped on car to rock it; chased off and plaintiff
jostled to the ground and run over.
Marks v. Rochester Ry, Co., 77 Hun, 77; 59 St. Rep..
848; 28 Supp. 314; 66 St. Rep. 233, and 146 N. Y.
181.
Captain of lighter called to truckman waiting for tank to lend
a hand in handling it; rope broke and tank fell on him.
Anderson v. Boyer, 13 App. Div. 258; 77 St. Rep. 87;
43 Supp. 8&7; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 139.
Mate called to boy on dock to cast off stern line; hit by anchor
on the vessel.
Geibel v. Elwell, 19 App. Div. 285; 91 Hun, 550; 70 St.
Rep. 812; 36 Supp. 238.
BLASTING.
Premature blast while tamping charge.
Spelman v. Fisher Iron Co., 56 Barb. 151; dist. 13.
Week. Dig. 288. .
Premature blast while charging a drilled hole.
McMahon vy. Port Henry Iron Ore Co., 24 Hun, 48.
A blast exploded unexpectedly and a rock fell on intestate.
Cullen v. Norton, 52 Hun, 9; 22 St. Rep. 221; 4 Supp.
774; re-argument denied 24 St. Rep. 103, and 5 Supp.
528, and 1 Silv. 510; 29 St. Rep. 700; 9 Supp. 174;
rev. 36 St. Rep. 359, and 126 N. Y. 1.
In drilling holes in a pit for a blast an unexploded blast was
set off.
Mancuso v. Cataract Construction Co., 87 Hun, 519; 68
St. Rep. 153; 34 Supp. 273.
Intestate hit by fragment from blast not covered with logs.
Gallagher v. McMullin, 7 App. Div. 321; 40 Supp. 222.
Charge which had failed to explode, exploded on being drawn
out. .
Vitto v. Farley, 6 App. Div. 481; 39 Supp. 683; 3 Ann.
Cas. 308: 15 App. Div. 229; 78 St. Rep. 1; 44 Supp.
1; 15 Misc. 153; 72 St. Rep. 254; 36 Supp. 1105; 2
Am. Neg. Rep. 47.
250 MASTER AND SERVANT.
BRIDGE FELL.
Dry rot caused bridge to fall. Brakeman on car when it fell.
Faulkner v. Erie Ry. Co., 49 Barb. 324; explained 62
Barb. 218.
Same accident. :
Warner v. Erie Ry. Co., 49 Barb. 558; rev. 39 N. Y.
468; explained 62 Barb. 219; applied 4 Hun, 770;
applied 67 Barb. 99; explained 2 Lans. 515; criticised
and limited 1 T. & C. 528.
Bridge built generally defective and on a factor of three. It
fell with train upon which plaintiff was brakeman.
Vosburgh v. L.S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 14 Week. Dig. 514;
dist. 14 St. Rep. 188, and 28 Week. Dig. 2° dist. 25
St. Rep. 529, and 2 Silv. 598, and 6 Supp. 605; 94
N. Y. 374; dist. 55 Hun, 513, and 29 St. Rep. 755, aud
8 Supp. 780.
Fireman killed. Insecure bridge washed away by flood.
Bogart v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 72 Hun, 412; 55 St.
Rep. 291; 25 Supp. 175; aff'd 64 St. Rep. 702, and
145 N. Y. 283.
CARS ON TRACK RUN INTO.
Inspecting cars.
Train hit car being inspected.
Cruty v. Erie Ry. Co., 3 T. & C. 244; criticised 44 Hun,
311, and 7 St. Rep. 627, and 12 Civ. .Pro. 301.
Kicked cars against cars being inspected.
Potter v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 60 Hun, 313; 38
St. Rep. 798; 15 Supp. 12; 136 N. Y. 77; dist. 62 Hun,
297, and 42 St. Rep. 200, and 17 Supp. 120.
Cars being inspected started suddenly.
Warn v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 71; 61
Se Rep. 585; 29 Supp. 897; 92 Hun, 91; 71 St. Rep.
120; 36 Supp. 336.
Kicked cars against car being inspected.
Hanrahan v. Brooklyn El. R. R. Co., 17 App. Div. 588;
79 St. Rep. 474; 45 Supp. 474; 3 Am. Neg. Rep. 581.
Repairing cars.
Car and locomotive suddenly started from faulty valve and
moved against car being repaired.
Cone v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 15 Hun, 172; followed
MASTER AND SERVANT. 251
CARS ON TRACK RUN INTO.
Repairing cars.
34 St. Rep. 823, and 11 Supp. 914; aff’d 81 N. Y. 206;
applied 49 Hun, 464, and 23 St. Rep. 636, and 3 Supp.
483; dist. 126 N. Y. 574, and 38 St. Rep. 428; applied
25 Hun, 146; dist. 27 Hun, 94.
Locomotive ran into car being repaired.
Lyons v.N. Y.C. & H. R.R. R. Co., 39 Hun, 385.
Car kicked against car being repaired; flag up; wild engine
scaped from hostler.
Murphy v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 44 Hun, 242;
10 St. Rep. 156; 26 Week. Dig. 494; aff’d 29 St. Rep.
941, and 118 N. Y. 527; 11 Daly, 122; 88 N. Y. 445;
19 Week. Dig. 414; 98 N. Y. 635; criticised 48 St.
Rep. 846; criticised 136 N. Y. 82.
Car kicked against car being repaired.
Pyees v. N. Y.& N. E.R. R. Co., 20 Week. Dig. 394.
No flag up; repairing cars.
Corcoran v. D., L. & W.R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 251; 47
St. Rep. 147; 19 Supp. 994: 126 N. Y. 673.
Car backed against car being repaired. ;
Abel v. D. & H.C. Co., 4 St. Rep. 269; 25 Week. Dig.
124; 31 St. Rep. 456; 103 N: Y. 581; 10 Supp. 154;
40 St. Rep. 626; 128 N. Y. 662; applied 107 N. Y.
383, and 12 St. Rep. 9, and 27 Week. Dig. 393; dist. 61
Hun, 14, and 40 St. Rep. 26, and 15 Supp. 384; limited
41 St. Rep. 863, and 16 Supp. 561.
Cars switched against cars being repaired.
Keenan v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 2 Misc. 34; 49
St. Rep. 513; 21 Supp. 445; 6 Misc. 631; 27 Supp.
1135; aff'd 64 St. Ren. 576, and 145 N. Y. 190.
Car kicked against car being repaired.
Doing v. N. Y., O. & W. Ry. Co., 73 Hun, 270; 43 St.
Rep. 820; 17 Supp. 689; 58 St. Rep. 64; 26 Supp.
405; 151 N. Y. 579; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 335.
Car switched against car being repaired.
Van Sickle v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 12 Misc. 217; 66
St. Rep. 857; 33 Supp. 265.
Cars kicked against car being repaired; against rule.
Moeller v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 13 App. Div. 467; 77
St. Rep. 603; 43 Supp. 603; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 503.
252 MASTER AND SERVANT.
CAUGHT IN ROPES AND CHAINS.
Intestate tending guy rope on bucket unloading coal irom boat.
Rope coiled around leg and raised him. Engineer lowered
suddenly and intestate fell into hold.
Sweeny v. N. Y. Steam Co., 15 Daly, 312; 6 Supp. 528;
117 N. Y. 642.
Hook of hill horse chain caught and horse turned back sud-
denlv. Hill boy stepped to ground and caught in chain.
Devlin v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 17 App. Div. 491;
79 St. Rep. 505; 45 Supp. 505; 3 Am. Neg. Rep. 577.
COLLISIONS.
Animals on track.
Cow on track. Brakeman thrown against defendant's piles of
wood at side of track.
Sherman v. Rochester & S. R. R. Co., 15 Barb. 5743
aff'd 17 N. Y. 153.
Cattle on track; no fences. Bell ringer injured.
Langlois v. Buffalo & R. R. R. Co., 19 Barb. 364; over-
ruled 119 N. Y. 474, and 29 St. Rep. 589.
Horse on track; no cattle guards. Engineer injured.
McMillan v. Saratoga & W.R. R. Co., 20 Barb. 449.
Donnegan v. Erhardt, 16 St. Rep. 579; 23 J. & S. 502;
3 Supp. 820; 28 Week. Dig. 407; rev. 29 St. Rep.
589, and 119 N. Y. 468.
Brakes.
Brakeman on car being switched could not pet at brake; lum-/
ber improperly loaded.
Byrnes v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 5543.
28 Week. Dig: 49; rev. 22 St. Rep. 936, and 113 N.Y.
251; 71 Hun, 2c9; 54 St. Rep. 288; 24 Supp. 517;
dist. 31 St. Rep. 801, and g Supp. 881; dist. 45 St.
Rep. 156, and 18 Supp. 841; followed 117 N. Y. 639,
and 27 St. Rep. 246, and 2 Silv. 460.
Brakeman could not hold car with defective brake on side
track with a grade; it collided with train on main line.
Healy v. Ryan, 25 Week. Dig. 23; aff’d 116 N. Y. 657.
Same accident ; engineer.
Newell v. Ryan, 40 Hun, 286; aff’d 116 N. Y. 656.
Conductor of trolley injured in collision with car ahead; defec-
tive brakes.
McNamara v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 11 Misc. 667+;
66 St. Rep. 247+ 22 Suan aro
MASTER AND SERVANT. 253
COLLISIONS.
Headlights.
Trackman on hand car without light run into by stake train
following without light.
Coon v. Syracuse & Utica R. R. Co., 6 Barb. 231; aff'd
5 N. Y. 492; dist. 5 Duer, 41 ; which was rev. 17 N. Y.
134; followed 5 Hun, 495; followed 17 N. Y. 155; fol-
lowed 39 N. Y. 471.
Fireman killed. No headlight. Violation of other rules.
Whittaker v. D. & H. C. Co., 49 Hun, 400; 22 St. Rep.
405 ; 3 Supp. 576; 34 St. Rep. 822; 11 Supp. 914; aff'd
38 St. Rep. 523, and 126 N. Y. 544..
Fireman of approaching train running faster than the rule
jumped on seeing locomotive ahead showing but a small
lantern for headlight.
Simpson v. Central Vt. R. R. Co., 5 App. Div. 614; 39
Supp. 464.
Orders or signals.
Engineer killed. Error of train dispatcher. Dispatcher drank
to excess.
Chapman v. Erie Ry. Co., 1 T. & C., 526; rev. 55 N. Y.
579; explained 58 Hun, 417, and 35 St. Rep. 271, and
12 Supp. 150; relied on 23 Hun, 472.
Fireman killed. Conductor failed to give orders to engineer.
Slater v. Jewett, 80 N. Y. 46; dist. 126 N. Y. 574, and
38 St. Rep. 428; 85 N. Y. 61; applied 123 N. Y. 4,
and 33 St. Rep. 46; dist. 46 Hun, 376, and 11 St. Rep.
841, and 27 Week. Dig. 469; dist. 55 Hun, 56, and 28
St. Rep. 59, and 8 Supp. 272; dist. 43 St. Rep. 220,
and 16 Supp. 840.
Fireman killed. Engineer of approaching train tired out and
forgot his order to stop. Engineer dispatcher insisted on
sending him out.
Bauer v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 20 Week. Dig.
532.
Orders and rules not clear.
Shiner v. Russell, 6 St. Rep. 78; 25 Week. Dig. 261;
aff'd 112 N. Y. 680.
Fireman killed. Operator received orders correctly, but re-
ported them wrong to engineer.
Sheehan v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 91 N. Y. 3325
254 MASTER AND SERVANT.
COLLISIONS.
Orders or signals.
followed 46 Hun, 374, and 11 St. Rep: 841, and 27
Week. Dig. 469.
Same accident; engineer killed. g
Dana v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 23 Hun, 473; 24
Hun, 495; 92 N. Y. 639; followed 46 Hun, 374, and
11 St. Rep. 841, and 27 Week. Dig. 469.
Engineer injured. Operator gave signal to wrong train; also
throttle blew out.
Monaghan v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 45 Hun, 113;
g St. Rep. 672; 27 Week. Dig. 85.
Freight and passenger approaching a switch. Flagman in-
competent and gave wrong signal. Brakeman injured.
Bossont v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep. 884; 10
Supp. 602; aff'd 126 N. Y. 646; 42 St. Rep. 391; 131
N. Y. 37.
Engineer killed. Orders not sufficiently comprehensive.
Sutherland v. Troy & Boston R. R. Co., 46 Hun, 372;
11 St. Rep. 841; 27 Week. Dig. 469; 28 St. Rep. 201;
8 Supp. 83; rev. 35 St. Rep. 853, and 125 N. Y. 737;
56 St. Rep. 397; 26 Supp. 237.
Fireman injured. Rules all right, but error of train dispatcher.
Hankins v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R. R. Co., 55 Hun, 51;
28 St. Rep. 59; 8 Supp. 272: 142 N. Y. 416; followed
50 St. Rep. 937; followed 22 Supp. 1120.
Engineer injured. Wrong orders by train dispatche-.
McChesney v. Panama R. R. Co., 66 Hun, 627; 49 St.
Rep. 148; 21 Supp. 207; 74 Hun, 150; 56 St. Rep.
415: 26 Supp. 248; aff'd 148 N. Y. 729.
Engineer injured. Handed wrong order.
Bryant v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 81 Hun, 164; 62
Sé. Rep. 670; 30 Supp. 737.
Conductor of stalled train killed. Caution card at block not
heeded by engineer of following train.
Niles v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 13 App. Div. 549;
77 St. Rep. 734: 43 Supp. 734: 14 App. Div. 58; 77
St. Rep. 751; 43 Supp. 751; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 511.
MASTER AND. SERVANT. 255
COLLISIONS.
eco ir or slowing up.
Engineer killed in colliding with freight being made up not
properly signalled; no torpedoes.
Mann v. D. & H.C. Co., 12 Week. Dig. 7; gt N. Y.
495; followed 13 Week. Dig. 08.
Same accident. Fireman killed.
Dwyer v. D. & H. C. Co., 13 Week. Dig. 98.
Conductor slackened speed without rear flagging, according
to rule.
Dow v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.R. Co., 22 Week. Dig. 283.
Intestate did not signal train, which hit him.
Le Bahn v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 116;
61 St. Rep. 760; 30 Supp. 7.
Fireman killed in rear-end collision in a fog.
Kemmerer v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 81 Hun, 444; 63 St.
Rep. 323; 31 Supp. 82.
Engineer of train which ran into stalled train not flagged.
Park v.N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 85 Hun, 184; 65
St. Rep. 807; 32 Supp. 482.
’ Fireman killed. Exception to rule sending brakeman back
from stopped train.
Smith v. N. Y. C. & H. R.urR. R. Co., 88 Hun, 468; 69
St. Rep. 76; 34 Supp. 881; aff'd 153 N. Y. 664.
Switched misplaced.
Running switch; cars standing on side track. Brakeman rid-
ing to work killed.
Moran v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 67 Barb. 96;
3 T. & C. 770.
Switching; no light on cars stored on side track presurnably
clear. Brakeman killed.
Shepard v. N. Y.C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 44 St. Rep. 816;
18 Supp. 665.
Engineer killed. Switch operator thought switch was wrong
and impulsively threw it open.
Burke v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 21;
52 St. Rep. 813; 23 Supp. 458.
Opened switch and left it; killed brakeman of train on side
track.
Cameron v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 77 Hun, 519;
2 56 MASTER AND SERVANT.
COLLISIONS.
Switches misplaced.
60 St. Rep. 273; 28 Supp. 898; rev. 64 St. Rep. 839,
and 145 N. Y. 400.
Train on side track left switch open, Conductor of following
train killed.
Davis v. Staten Island R. T. R. R. Co., 1 App. Div. 178;
72 St. Rep. 559; 37 Supp. 157.
Train ahead parted.
Freight ahead parted and ran back; fireman of following train
killed.
Flike v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 53 N. Y. 549; dist. 48 St.
Rep. 845; examined 4 Hun, 575; examined 5 Hun,
494; applied 16 Hun, 212; applied 21 Hun, 507; ap-
plied 55 N. Y. 583; applied 58 N. Y. 58; which aff'd
3 T. & C. 57; applied 59 N. Y. 20; applied 11 Hun,
592; applied 73 N Y. 38; applied 80 N. Y. 52; applied
13 J. & S. go; dist. 70 N. Y. 174; dist. 64 N. Y. 10;
dist. 85 N. Y. 61; explained 81 N. Y. 521.
Same accident; brakeman killed.
Sprong v. B.& A. R. R. Co., 3 T. & C., 54; aff'd 58 N.
Y. 56.
Same accident; brakeman killed.
Rose v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 58 N. Y. 217; explained 85
N. Y. 61.
Same accident; engineer killed. ;
Booth v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 67 N. Y. 593; 73 N. Y. 38;
explained and followed 80 N. Y. 46; applied 21 Hun,
500.
Train ahead stalled and parted. Incompetent man to flag.
Fireman of following train injured.
Baird v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 16 App. Div. 490;
78 St. Rep. 926; 44 Supp. 926; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 604.
Wild cars or hand cars.
Gravel train being pushed; workman on it killed. Hand car on
track in violation of rule.
Carr v. North River Construction Co., 48 Hun, 266; 17
St. Rep. 945.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 257
COLLISIONS.
Wild cars or hand cars.
Workman on gravel train on main track killed. No flag out.
Hall v. Cooperstown & S. V. R. R. Co., 49 Hun, 373;
19 St. Rep. 646; 3 Supp. 584.
Car blown from siding; fireman of colliding train killed.
France v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 318; 68 St.
Rep. 418; 34 Supp. 408.
Car blown from side track; brake shoe defective. Engineer
injured.
J. Smith v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 9 St. Rep. 612;
rev. 30 St. Rep. 612, and 118 N. Y. 645.
Train being made up; cars kicked against car in which plain-
tiff was expressman.
Woods v. Long Island R. R. Co., 11 App. Div. 16; 76
St. Rep. 140; 42 Supp. 140.
Unclassified.
Brakeman injured. Engineer of other train incompetent;
train ran by switch.
Wright v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 28 Barb. 80; rev. 25 N.Y.
562; followed 22 N. Y. 354; applied 56 Barb. 155;
applied 65 Barb. 131; applied 5 Hun, 494; applied 7
Lans. 69; applied 58 N. Y. 221; reconciled 2 Lans.
511; examined and applied 39 N. Y. 477;.explained
15 Hun, 177; dist. 38 N. Y. 247; dist. 55 N. Y. 579;
followed N. Y. Daily Reg., Jan. 26, 1884; limited and
explained 49 N. Y. 521. .
Surveyor riding free from home to his work. Run against by
locomotive; engineer negligent.
Ross v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 5 Hun, 488; aff'd
74 N. Y. 617; applied 95 N. Y. 267.
Killed in New Jersey.
Stallknecht v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 53 How. Pr. 305;
aff'd 13 Hun, 451.
Brakeman in caboose saw rear-end collision imminent. Went
out front door and was crushed between the cars; defective
buffers.
Ellis v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 95 N. Y. 546;
dist. 43 Hun, 32, and 6 St. Rep. 572, and 25 Week.
Dig. 415.
[17]
258 MASTEK AND SERVANT.
COLLISIONS.
Unelassified.
Killed while riding to work.
Vick v. N. ¥.C. & H.R. P. R. Co., 17 Week. Dig. 316;
g5 N. Y. 267; 22 Week. Dig. 474; 104 N. Y. 676;
followed 27 J. & S. 37=. anfl 39 St. Rep. 153, and 14
Supp. 630.
Fireman killed; his engineer, who was near-sighted and drank,
was on a switch and ran too near main line.
Englehardt v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 588.
Engineer of vessel drowned; signals changed at last moment.
Engineer’s captain drank.
Senecal v. Thousand Island S. S. Co., 79 Hun, 574; 61
St. Rep. 572; 29 Supp. 884.
Fireman killed. His train trying to make switch in insufficient
time without flagging ahead.
Herrington v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 83 Hun, 365; 64
St. Rep. 647; 31 Supp. gio.
Employee killed while riding on train on private business.
chiefly.
West v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 17 App. Div. 116;
79 St. Rep. 93; 45 Supp. 93; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 773.
COUPLING CARS.
Car or load defective.
Thrown down by projecting truss rod; had just been inspected.
Scoville v. Erie Ry. Co., 3 Week. Dig. 114.
No grab handle at end of car.
Martin v.N. Y..N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 103 N. Y. 626;
4 St. Rep. 303; 25 Week. Dig. 197.
Standing on bumper. Impact jarred brakeman off. Brakes
of car defective and brake beam caught and dragged him;
run over.
Lilly v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 107 N. Y. 566; 12
St. Rep. 468; 27 Week. Dig. 485; dist. 32 St. Rep.
818, and 10 Supp. 645.
Car loaded with rails projecting two feet over car.
Redington v. N. Y., O. & W. Ry. Co., 84 Hun, 231; 65
St. Rep. 804; 32 Supp. 535.
Deadwoods or bumpers.
Caught glove on niece of iron projecting from bumper.
Gibson v. Northern Central R. R. Co., 22 Hun, 289.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 259
COUPLING CARS.
Deadwoods or bumpers.
Drawhead overrode hook on other car; three-link chain used.
Plank five inches thick instead of bumper on one car.
De Kay v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R.R. Co., 19 Week. Dig.
479.
One bumper lower than the other. Staple broken. Used
straight link.
Goodrich v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 3 St. Rep. 774;
aff'd 116 N. Y. 398, and 26 St. Rep. 767; 22 Week.
Dig. 155; dist. 125 N. Y. 17, and 34 St. Rep. 372;
followed 39 St. Rep. 912, and 15 Supp. 501.
Broad and narrow gauge cars. Buffers only three inches.
Gottlieb v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 29 Hun, 637;
100 N. Y. 462; applied 116 N. Y. 401, and 26 St. Rep.
767; dist. 126 N. Y. 574, and 38 St. Rep. 428.
Deadwoods of jimmy lower than those of chronic car.
Dye ¥, D,, L.& W. RR: Co, m0 WN. ¥. tzr; ar St.
Rep. 690; 3 Silv. 610; 8 Misc. 688; 59 St. Rep. 583;
28 Supp. 689; aff'd 70 St. Rep. 869, and 146 N. Y. 400.
Bumper or drawhead of engine was lower than that of car.
Donohue v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 485;
14 Supp. 639; aff'd 131 N. Y. 623.
Sills projecting four or five inches broke plaintiff's arm.
Beaudin v. Central Vt. R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 473; 1
“Supp. 700.
No bumpers or deadwoods
Pullutro v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 27 St. Rep. 63;
7 Supp. 510; 39 St. Rep. 293; 15 Supp. 783.
One bumper gone.
Mahoney v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 39 St. Rep.
git; 15 Supp. 501; aff'd 43 St. Rep. 962, and 131
N. Y. 623; 46 St. Rep. 738; 19 Supp. 511.
Bumper gone.
Cole v. Fall Brook Coal Co.,°32 St. Rep. 762; 10 Supp.
417; 40 St. Rep. 834; 16 Supp. 789; 87 Hun, aoe 68
St. Rep. 636; 34 Supp. 572.
No bustle on engine.
McLarney v. Long Island R. R. Co., 11 Misc. 64; 64
St. Rep. 629; 31 Supp. 862.
260 MASTER AND SERVANT.
COUPLING CARS.
Drawheads.
Broken drawhead. Yardman tried to couple it.
Arnold v. D. & H. C. Co., 6 St. Rep. 368; 16 St. Rep.
310; 1 Supp. 409; aff'd 34 St. Rep. 372, and 125 N.Y.
15.
Crippled car; extension block, bumpers and drawhead gone.
Car not marked.
Albert v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 152; 61
St. Rep. 707; 29 Supp. 1126; rev. 150 N. Y. 564.
One bumper over the other and deadwoods came together.
Joyce v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 601; 61 St.
Rep. 586; 29 Supp. 898; 92 Hun, 107; 71 St. Rep.
742; 36 Supp. 731.
Drawheads of different heights. No crooked links.
Bennett v. Greenwich & J. Ry. Co.,.84 Hun, 216; 65 St.
Rep. 642; 32 Supp. 457.
Inspector’s hand caught in adjusting the dog of a coupler.
Other car coupled on.
Rhodes v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 8 Misc. 366; 59
St. Rep. 596; 28 Supp. 691; aff'd 149 N. Y. 586.
Drawhead defective.
Jennings v. N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 12 Misc. 408;
67 St. Rep. 408; 33 Supp. 585.
Drawheads not level, but did not pass each other.
Edall v. New England R. R. Co., 18 App. Div. 216; 79
St. Rep. 959; 45 Supp. 959.
One drawhead lower than the other. Rule for coupling stick
which was not used.
McDonald v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 19 App. Div. 577.
Locomotive started suddenly.
Incompetent engineer started before brakeman getting on front
gave signal.
Sizer v.S., B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 7 Lans. 67.
Driller attaching chain to car with broken bumper. Yard-
master signalled engineer to back without warning.
McCosker v. Long Island R. R. Co., 21 Hun, 500; 69
How. Pr. 258; rev. 84 N. Y. 77; dist. 52 Hun, 12, and
22 St. Rep. 221, and 4 Supp. 7oa; dist. 42 St. Rep.
220, and 16 Supp. 840; followed 111 N. Y. 198, and
19 St. Rep. 621.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 261
COUPLING CARS.
Locomotive started suddenly.
Car coupler caught his foot and signalled engineer. Could not
stop locomotive, which had been defective more than two
weeks; defendant had proniised to repair it.
Bajus v. S.. B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 34 Hun, 153; 16
Week. Dig. 109; rev. 3 St. Rep. 96, and 103 N. Y.
312; 25 Week. Dig. 9g; 5 Supp. 804; 119 N. Y. 651.
Locomotive started suddenly ; valve cocked or lifted.
Toms v. Buffalo Creek R. R. Co., 70 Hun, 84.
Pin stuck in hole; yard switchman tried to knock it up and
engine backed on car.
Howey v. L.S.& M.S. Ry. Co., 13 Misc. 641; 59 St.
Rep. 140; 34 Supp. 1089; 15 Misc. 526; 72 St. Rep.
120; 37 Supp. 88.
Road bed defective — ditches.
Brakeman stepped into sluiceway two feet wide and deep under
the tracks. Only one plank across in the mid:le.
Plank v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 1 T. & C. 319;
aff'd 60 N. Y. 607; dist. 129 N. Y. 671, and 42 St. Rep.
354, and 3 Silv. 643; explained 23 J. & S. 138, and 11
St. Rep. 725, and 27 Week. Dig. 335; followed 114
N. Y. 585, and 24 St. Rep. 550; explained and dist.
23 Hun, 490; which was aff'd 88 N. Y. 269; explained
and dist. 9 J. & S. 248.
Yard car coupler slipped in ditch 4 to 12 inches deep across
tracks.
Harr v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 13 St. Rep. 227;
aff’d 2 Sil. 260, and 23 St. Rep. 187, and 114 N. Y.
623.
Stepped into open ditch under track six to eight inches deep
between two ties.
De Forest v. Jewett, 19 Hun, 509; 23 Hun, 490; aff'd
88 N. Y. 264; dist. 49 Hun, 461, and 23 St. Rep. 636,
and 3 Supp. 483; followed 111 N. Y. 554, and 20 St.
Rep. go.
Brakeman stumbled in sluiceway eight to ten inches deep and
fourteen inches wide. Dark and snow on ground.
Millen v. N: Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 20 App. Div. 92.
262 MASTER AND SERVANT.
COUPLING CARS.
Road bed defective — frog unblocked.
Switchman caught his foot in an unblocked frog.
Appel v. B., N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 2 St. Rep. 257; 111
N. Y. 550; 20 St. Rep. go; ‘followed i129 N. Y. 672,
and 42 St. Rep. 354, and 3 Silv. 643; followed 23 St.
Rep. 895, and 7 Supp. 609.
Caught foot in unblocked frog.
Ireland v. Gardner, 26 St. Rep. 895; 7 Supp. 609.
Brakeman caught foot in unblocked frog; main line and side
track.
Spencer v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 67 Hun, 196; 51
St. Rep. 386; 22 Supp. 100.
Brakeman caught foot in unblocked frog.
Meek v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 488; 52
St. Rep. 932; 28 Supp. 420; 55 St. Rep. 929; 140 N. Y.
622.
Road bed defective — unclassified.
Switchman caught foot in cattle guard near scales.
Fredenburg v. Northern Central R. R. Co., 114 N. Y.
582; 24 St. Rep. 550.
Fell into pit for cable of inclined plane. Plank covering had
not been replaced.
Filbert v. D. & H. C. Co., 24 J. & S. 170; 18 St. Rep.
964; 2 Supp. 623; rev. 121 N. Y. 207; 30 St. Rep.
494.
Flagman, after coupling, stepped back and slipped on pile of
cobblestones 25 feet long and 15 to 24 inches high, which
had been there over six weeks; covered with snow.
Wooster v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 4o St. Rep.
844; 16 Supp. 764.
Brakeman caught foot between ties on unballasted branch
track.
Finnel v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 129 N. Y. 669; 42 St.
Rep. 354; 3 Silv. 643.
Brakeman stepped into hole ten inches wide and eight inches
deep between the tracks; left after tamping.
Artis v. B., R. & P.R. R. Co., 3 App. Div. 1; 73 St. Rep.
519; 37 Supp. 977; 74 St. Rep. 471; 38 Supp. 42.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 263
COUPLING CARS.
Road bed defective — unclassified.
Brakeman’s foot slipped on rotten plank walk at side of track
in front of station.
Bird v. Long Island R. R. Co., 11 App. Div. 134; 76 St.
Rep. 888; 42 Supp. 888.
Rules.
Brakeman making up train; his train hit by cars near being
struck by engine. No guard signal and no rule therefor.
Berrigan v. N. Y., L. E.& W. R. R. Co., 59 Hun, 627;
37 St. Rep. 414; 14 Supp. 26; rev. 131 N. Y. 582, and
42 St. Rep. 858; doubted 61 Hun, 15, and 4o St. Rep.
26, and 15 Supp. 384.
Brakeman coupling cars which were hit by cars kicked by
engine. No rule against this.
Larow v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 61 Hun, 11; 40
St. Rep. 26; 15 Supp. 384.
Rule for coupling sticks had never been enforced.
Hannigan v. Lehigh & H.R. Ry. Co., 91 Hun, 300; 71
St. Rep. 61; 36 Supp. 293.
Did not use coupling stick according to rule.
Renninger v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 11 App. Div.
565; 76 St. Rep. 813; 42 Supp. 813.
Fireman nicknamed “crazy” ran locomotive six or eight fect
against a coach plaintiff was coupling. Rule forbidding fire-
men to run locomotives.
Marrinan v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 13 App. Div.
439; 77 St. Rep. 606; 43 Supp. 606.
Unelassified.
Fellow brakeman incompetent and did not answer signal.
Van Dusen v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 12 St. Rep. 351;
aff'd 122 N. Y. 666.
Uncoupled cars and stepped back; hit by disused unlighted
switch-stand.
G. T. Smith v. N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 33 St. Rep.
707; 11 Supp. 586; 26 J. & S. 284.
Machinists’ helper directed to couple cars in motion.
McDermott v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep.
33: 13 Supp. 435; aff'd 131 N. Y. 668; 1 Am. Neg.
Cas. 499.
264 MASTER AND SERVANT.
COUPLING CARS.
Unelassified.
Brakeman caught between car and a wagon left near side track
by third person.
Connors v. E., C. & N. R. R. Co., 92 Hun, 339; 72 St.
Rep. 331; 36 Supp. 926.
Night switchman on engine foot-board. Steam escaped irom
relief valve or piston and suddenly obscured his view just as
he was making a coupling.
Hope v. Fall Brook Coal Co., 3 App. Div. 70; 38 Supp.
1040.
DERAILMENTS.
Brakes.
Brakeman injured. Not sufficient brakes in good order.
Train went to pieces and piled up. Rule for brakenian to
inspect brakes.
La Croy v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 57 Uun, 67;
31 St. Rep. 753; 10 Supp. 382; rev. 43 St. Rep. 711,
and 132 N. Y. 570. .
Driver of horse car injured. Brake would not work, so he
pulled his team to the side to derail the car, and was drawn
against the dashboard.
Kenney v. Second Avenue R. R. Co., 89 Hun, 340; 35
Supp. 395.
Brakeman killed. Conductor decided he needed no help. J.ost
control of train on heavy grade. Claim of no rule and iasuf-
ficient locomotive brakes.
Wooden v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 35 St. Rep.
685 ; 12 Supp. 908 ; aff'd 36 St. Rep. 387, and 126 N.Y.
10; 43 St. Rep. 218; 16 Supp. 840; re-argument denied
46 St. Rep. 77, and 18 Supp. 768; 5 Misc. 537; 58 St.
Rep. 112; 25 Supp. 977; rev. 70 St. Rep. 83, and 147
N. Y. 508.
Trolley motorman killed. Slippery tracks on steep grade.
Car ran away and into building. Brake defective and no
sandman.
Windover v. Troy City Ry. Co., 4 App. Div. 202; 74
St. Rep. 218; 38 Supp. 591.
om MASTER AND SERVANT. 265
DERAILMENTS.
Switches.
Fireman killed. Switch turned wrong. Claim of incompetent
and too few switchmen.
Tinney v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 62 Barb. 218; aff'd 52
N. Y. 632.
Engineer killed. Misplaced switch; signal right.
Baulec v. N. Y. & H.R. R. Co., 62 Barb. 623; 5. Lans. »
436; 12 Abb. Pr. N. S. 310; aff'd 48 How. Pr. 399,
and 59 N. Y. 356; applied 36 St. Rep. 907, and 13
Supp. 175.
Fireman killed. Open common switch.
Salters v. D. & H.C. Co., 3 Hun, 338; 5 T. & C. 559:
approved 108 N. Y. 155, and 13 St. Rep. 105, and 27
Week. Dig. 554; dist. 62 Hut, 173, and 41 St. Rep.
804, and 16 Supp. 640; followed 43 Hun, 30, and 6
St. Rep. 572, and 25 Week. Dig. 415; dist. 15 Hun,
172.
Fireman killed. Switch left open by incompetent switchman.
Harvey v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 19 Hun, 556; 32
St. Rep. 817; 10 Supp. 645; 88 N. Y. 481.
Brakeman injured. Direct cross-over; switch left open by
switchman.
Coppins v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 43 Hun, 26; 6
St. Rep. 572; 25 ‘Week. Dig. 415;°48 Hun, 292; 17
St. Rep. 916; aff'd 34 St. Rep. 214, and 122 N. Y.
557; dist. 26 St. Rep. 962, and 7 Supp. 78.
Riding from work. Locomotive backing. Ran into open
switch without target, into car on side track.
Bennett v. Long Island R. R. Co., 21 App. Div. 25.
Track defective.
Engineer killed. Rails short and insecurely fastened.
Mehan v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 73 N. Y.
585; applied 24 Hun, 48; followed 80 N. Y. 46.
Fireman killed. Defective ties, rails and joints had been
pointed out to track foreman.
Gage v. D., L. & W.R.R. Co., 14 Hun, 446.
Engineer injured. Road defective. Ordered to run light at
a higher speed than usual after he had objected.
Hawley v. Northern Central Ry. Co., 17 Hun, 115; aff'd
266 MASTER AND SERVANT.
DERAILMENTS.
Track defective.
82 N. Y. 370; dist. 45 Hun, 119, and 9 St. Rep. 672,
and 27 Week. Dig. 85; dist. 15 Daly, 27, and 16 St.
Rep. 693, and 1 Supp. 273; explained and applied 24
Hun, 49.
Engineer killed. Either track defective or flange of locomotive
forward wheel broke.
Durkin v. Sharp, 88 N. Y. 225; dist. 25 St. Rep. 520,
and 2 Silv. 598, and 6 Supp. 605.
Laborer riding on construction train killed by derailment
caused by frozen mud on flange side of rail.
Brick v. Rochester, N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 98 N. Y. 211.
Fireman killed. Ties rotten and rail tipped over.
Graham v. Chapman, 33 St. Rep. 349; 11 Supp. 318.
Track spongy and rail would work up and down two or three
inches. Car upon which deceased was ran off the track and
into signal tower, which fell on deceased.
Pidgeon v. Long Island R. R. Co., 87 Hun, 43; 67 St.
Rep. 237; 34 Supp. 187; aff'd 152 N. Y. 652.
Thrown from car; rails spread.
Hickey v. Sylvan Lake O. & I. Co., 18 Week. Dig. 8.
Unclassified.
Riding home on gravel train after work.
Russell v. H. R. R. R. Co., 5 Duer, 39; rev. 17 N. Y.
134; applied 114 N. Y. 284, and 23 Abb. N. C. 118,
and 23 St. Rep. 220; dist. 57 Hun, 538, and 11 Supp.
239; followed 46 Barb. 411; followed 51 Barb. 66;
followed 7 Bosw. 197; followed 45 How. Pr. 450; fol-
lowed 1 Hun, 349; applied 47 How. Pr. 103; dist. 4
Hun, 813; explained 22 N. Y. 466; applied 29 N. Y.
846; applied 64 How. Pr. 57; applied 23 Hun, 477.
Train in passing caught up plank; following train struck plank
and derailed. Fireman killed.
Emma Casey v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 25 Week.
Dig. 568.
Brakeman killed. Trestle over sinkhole caught from burning
grass and gave way.
Near v. D. & H.C. Co., 32 Hun, 557.
Riding from work on construction train. Defective car was
MASTER AND SERVANT. 267
DERAILMENTS.
Unclassified.
placed in front of train; it gave way and plaintiff was thrown
off and run over.
Reynolds v. Kneeland, 63 Hun, 283; 44 St. Rep. 458;
17 Supp. 895; aff'd 54 St. Rep. 931, and 139 N. Y.
616.
Bluff fell on track.
True v. Lehigh Valiey R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 588.
ELEVATORS.
Crushed.
Water boy of 14 in factory projected his foot beyond elevator
floor and it was crushed under an arch.
; Costello v. Judson, 21 Hun, 396.
Carpenter working caught elevator chain to steady himself.
Elevator rose and caught his hand in a pulley.
_, Baxter v. Richardson, 8 St. Rep. 155; 22 J. & S. 230.
Operator could not stop elevator; went up through iron doors
over shaft and crushed him.
Dervin v. Herrman, 31 St. Rep. 179; 9 Supp. 722; 23°
J. & S. 274; 28 Week. Dig. 172.
Deceased caught between elevator and hatchway ; freight ele-
vator on vessel.
Riordan v. Ocean S S. Co., 32 St. Rep. 328; 11 Supp.
56; aff'd 36 St. Rep. 476, and 124 N. Y. 655.
No guard rails on elevator; platform loose. Truck rolled
against plaintiff and forced him to the side where he was
crushed.
Boehm v. Mace, 45 St. Rep. 285; 18 Supp. 106; 28 Abb.
N. C. 138.
Boy of 14 riding on boxes in elevator. Leg caught in beam
at side.
Hoehmann v. Moss Engraving Co., 4 Misc. 160; 53 St.
Rep. 195; 23 Supp. 787.
Falling.
Elevator fell with operator on it. Chain broke. Elevator
new; made by competent manufacturers. Defendant’s engi-
neer had stated that chain was not strong enough.
Delaney v. Hilton, 18 J. & S. 341.
268 MASTER AND SERVANT.
ELEVATORS.
Falling.
Allowed chain to slack.
Barnett v. Taylor, 18 Week. Dig. 4.
Elevator fell with plaintiff on‘it; seyeral defects.
Pendergast v. Johnston Harvester Co., 21 Week. Dig.
555-
Engineer ran elevator too high; rope broke and elevator and
plaintiff fell.
Stringham v. Stewart, 1 St. Rep. 769; 27 Hun, 562; 19
St. Rep. 621; 20 St. Rep. 978; 23 St. Rep. 995; 100
N. Y. 516; followed 50 Hun, 394, and 3 Supp. 227, and
21 St. Rep. 951; dist. 43 Hun, 31, and 6 St. Rep. 572,
and 25 Week. Dig. 415; dist. 58 Hun, 62, and 33 St.
Rep. 811, and 11 Supp. 347; dist. 32 St. Rep. 501, and
10 Supp. 595.
Continued sub nom.,
Stringham v. Hilton, 1 St. Rep. 769; rev. 19 St. Rep-
621, and 111 N. Y. 188; applied 119 N. Y. 125, and
28 St. Rep. 260; dist. 24 St. Rep. 750, and 5 Supp.
548; dist. 31 St. Rep. 801, and 9 Supp. &81.
A beam carried in car struck the roof of building; one of the
two clutches operating the drum broke and plaintiff and
elevator fell.
Brennan v. Gordon, 13 Daly, 208; 8 Supp. 637; 14 Daly,
47; 3 St. Rep. 604; rev. 29 St. Rep. 829, and 118 N. Y..
489.
Safety clutch failed to act. Plaintiff and elevator fell.
Kaye v. Rob Roy Hosiery Co., 51 Hun, 519; 21 St. Rep.
668; 4 Supp. 571.
No safety clutch. Elevator and plaintiff fell.
Hansen v. Schneider, 58 Hun, 60; 33 St. Rep S11; 1
Supp. 347.
Chain worn and broke. Plaintiff fell with elevator.
Corcoran v. Holbrook, 59 N. Y. 517; dist. 126 N. Y-
574, and 38 St. Rep. 428; dist. 58 Hun, 62, aud 33 St.
Rep. 811, and 11 Supp. 347; applied 11 Hun, 592.
Pinion of driving shaft broke. Elevator and deceased fell.
Boess v. Clausen & P. B. Co., 12 App. Div. 366; 76 St.
Rep. 848: 42 Supp. 848.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 269
ELEVATORS.
Mine buckets.
Dummy-yoke and cable broke; knocked deceased out of
bucket in mine shaft.
Dobbins v. Brown, 15 St. Rep. 1010; 1 Supp. 360; rev.
28 St. Rep. 957, and 119 N. Y. 188.
Follower caught and hit intestate in going up in bucket in mine
shaft.
Burke v. Brown, 14 St. Rep. 619; followed 15 St. Rep.
1010, and 1 Supp. 360.
Fell out of cage in ascending shaft from tunnel; one of the
middle guard rails gone.
Conlin v. Rogers, 39 St. Rep. 51; 14 Supp. 782.
Things falling on operators.
Box to catch dripping oil fell on plaintiff going up in elevator
with no top.
Hunt v. Walch, 5 Supp. 802.
Bars not placed across entrance. Vibrations of machinery
started barrel rolling; it fell down shaft on deceased.
Freeman v. Glens Falls P. M. Co., 61 Hun, 125; 39 St.
Rep. 621; 15 Supp? 657; 70 Hun, 530; 53 St. Rep.
786; 24 Supp. 403; aff'd 43 St. Rep. 390, and 142
N. Y. 639.
Hand elevator. Men pulled on rope to hoist. Clamp to which
rope was attached fell on plaintiff pulling.
Lawson v. Merrall, 69 Hun, 278; 53 St. Rep. 424; 23
Supp. 560.
Truck pushed through open doors upon elevator operator be-
low. Automatic doors did not work.
Reichert v. Buffalo S. & G. Co., 15 Misc. 222; 71 St.
Rep. 173; 36 Supp. 402.
Hook of check rope straightened and fell on elevator boy.
Bucher v. Pryibil, 19 App. Div. 126; 79 St. Rep. 972;
45 Supp. 972.
Unclassified.
Freight elevator caught. Engineer released it without taking
up slack. Sudden drop broke cable wheel, a piece of which,
being deflected, hit plaintiff.
Kern v. De Castro & D. S. R. Co., 24 St. Rep. 748; 5
Supp. 548; rev. 34 St. Rep. 363, and 125 N. Y. 50.
270 MASTER AND SERVANT.
ELEVATORS.
Unclassified.
Chains habitually crooked on drum. Floor of elevator tipped
and plaintiff slid down the shaft.
Hart v. Naumburg, 50 Hun, 392; 21 St. Rep. 951; 3
Supp. 227; rev. 33 St. Rep. 607, and 3 Silv. 190, and
123 N. Y. 641.
EXCAVATIONS.
Banks and piles.
Removing stone from pile. Another stone fell on plaintiff.
Brown v. Maxwell, 6 Hill, 592.
Laborer excavating under pier supported by needle; needle
broke and pier fell on plaintiff.
Eagan v. Tucker, 18 Hun, 347.
Digging clay from canal bank and loading it on State’ boat:
under direction of captain of boat. Bank fell on claimant:
Loughlin v. State of New York, 105 N. Y. 159; 6 St.
Rep. 826; 26 Week. Dig. 153; dist. 52 Hun, 12, and
22 St. Rep. 221, and 4 Supp. 704; dist. 43 St. Rep.
220, and 16 Supp. 840; followed 53 Hun, 148, and 24
St. Rep. 720, and 6 Supp. 129.
Constructing speedway along Harlem river by benches.
Large rock fell from 6 or 7 feet above plaintiff.
Perry v. Rogers, gt Hun, 243; 71 St. Rep. 105; 36 Supp.
208.
Bank of clay in brick yard slid on deceased.
Baker v. Sutton, 86 Hun, 588; 67 St. Rep. 776; 33 Supp.
1072; 11 App. Div. 271; 76 St. Rep.-116; 42 Supp.
116.
Excavation in street. Laborer lifting behind a stone in bank;
stone gulled by four horses ; bank fell on removing stone.
Paolo v. Hunter, 3 App. Div. 528; 73 St. Rep. 681; 38
Supp. 256.
Shoveling coal from large pile; surface frozen. Top fell on
plaintiff when undermined.
Miller v. Thomas, 15 App. Div. 105; 78 St. Rep. 277;
44 Supp. 277; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 2or.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 271
EXCAVATIONS.
Ditches and trenches.
Top of bank frozen. In undermining, sections left to support.
top; these removed and a portion fell. Workman on top
when the rest underneath was cut away and fell.
Leonard v. Collins, 70 N. Y. 90; dist. 49 Hun, 355, and
17 St. Rep. 46, and 2 Supp. 94.
Trench for frozen gas pipes. Pipes not located so undermined
laterally which caved in
Devine v. Tarrytown & I. V. Gaslight Co., 22 Hun, 26.
Excavating land near neighbor’s line; caved in.
Parker v. Totten, 2 City Ct. 155.
Excavating water main trench; 9 feet deep and 7 feet wide.
No timber at sides; caved in on plaintiff.
Doyle v. Baird, 25 St. Rep. 749; 6 Supp. 517; 15 Daly,
287. :
Excavating for sewer, 11 feet deep by 3 feet wide. Deceased
at bottom laying tile; sides caved in.
Koosorowska v. Glasser, 8 Supp. 197.
Sewer in street; excavation 16 feet deep by 5 feet wide;
planked. Water pipe near this burst, flooded excavation and
it caved in on deceased.
: Hoskins v. Stewart, 57 Hun, 380; 32 St. Rep. 962; 19
Supp. 833; 48 St. Rep. 929; 135 N. Y. 632.
Employe in machine shop was cleaning underground pipes
when the trench caved in and killed him.
Kranz v. Long Island R. R. Co., 17 St. Rep. 684; 1
Supp. 751; rev. 33 St. Rep. 46, and 123 N. Y. 1; dist.
126 N. Y. 8, and 36 St. Rep. 359; dist. 47 St. Rep.
295, and 19 Supp. goo; followed 44 St. Rep. 47, and 17
Supp. 321.
Plumber working in a trench 13 feet deep and 4 feet square not
shored up. Banks fell on him.
Stuber v. McEntee, 47 St. Rep. 294; 19 Supp. 900; 58
St. Rep. 455; 35 Abb. N. C. 246; 142 N. Y. 200.
Sewer trench caved in. New man not instructed not to work
in that particular place.
Burns v. Matthews, 71 St. Rep. 333; 146 N. Y. 386.
Ditch 54 feet deep caved in upon intestate.
Del Sejnore v. Hallinan, 91 Hun, 635; rev. 153 N. Y.
274; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 595.
272 MASTER AND SERVANT.
EXCAVATIONS.
Ditches and trenches.
Trench in street four feet deep caved in.
Collins v. Crimmins, 11 Misc. 24; 64 St. Rep. 626; 31
Supp. 860. ‘
Sewer trench caved in; no sheet piling.
Hayes v. Fav, 21 Misc. 538.
Ditck 10 feet ‘deep caved in.
Raynor v. Trolan, 22 App. Div. 107.
Mines and tunnels.
Miner in coal mine; large crack reported and noted, but noth-
ing done. Large mass of rock fell on plaintiff.
Pantzar v. Tilly Foster M. Co., 33 St. Rep. 416; 16
Week. Dig. 341; 99 N. Y. 368; applied 123 N. Y. 4,
and 36 St. Rep. 46; dist. 112 N. Y. 618, and ar St.
Rep. 848; dist. 126 N. Y. 7, and 36 St. Rep. 359; dist.
43 Hun, 31, and 6 St. Rep. 572, and 25 Week. Dig.
415; dist. 23 J. & S. 137, and 11 St. Rep. 725, and 27
Week. Dig. 335; dist. 47 St. Rep. 296, and 19 Supp.
goo; followed 15 Daly, 289, and 25 St. Rep. 749, and
6 Supp. 517; harmonized 14 St. Rep. Igo, and 28
Week. Dig. 2.
Overhanging rock in mine fell on plaintiff.
Berg v. Tilly Foster Mining Co., 18 Week. Dig. 343.
Rock fell from roof of mine.
McCall v. Witherbee, 21 Week. Dig. 530; 103 N. Y.
654.
Building tunnel for water; aqueduct. Rock fell from roof;
not timbered.
Eades v. Clark, 23 J. & S. 132; 11 St. Rep. 725; 27
Week. Dig. 335; disapproved 17 St. Rep. 438, and 2
upp. 133.
Rock fell from roof of mine.
Swenson v. Mahopac Iron Ore Co., 24 St. Rep. 4; 6
Supp. 520; 15 Daly, 319; aff’d 117 N. Y. 637.
Miner working under a 200-foot wall of “bad ground.” A
large mass of ore fell on him.
Buckley v. Port Henry Iron Ore Co., 17 St. Rep. 436;
2 Supp. 133; 117 N. Y. 645.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 273
EXPLOSIONS.
Locomotive boilers.
Fireman injured. Boiler known to be defective by defendant.
Keegan v. Western R. R. Co.,8 N. Y. 175; dist. 12 Abb.
Pr. N. S. 316; dist. 25 N. Y. 567; reviewed 39 N. Y.
477; applied 15 Hun, 177; explained and applied 20
Barb. 452; approved and applied 6 Duer, 230; dist.
28 How. Pr. 474; followed 26 Barb. 39.
Fireman killed. Staybolts broken. Not in repair shop for six
months previous.
Stevenson v. Jewett, 16 Hun, 210.
Locomotive in repair shop. Staybolts had been long broken
and sheets too thin, but it had passed inspection. Exploded
while intestate was setting safety valve.
Murphy v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 59 How. Pr. 197; 8 Abb.
N.C. 41; aff'd 11 Week. Dig. 566, and 24 Hun, 142,
and aff'd 88 N. Y. 146; dist. 123 N. Y. 5, and 33 St.
Rep. 46.
Only question whether brought in time.
Bonnell v. Jewett, 24 Hun, 524.
Fireman killed. Locomotive had been generally defective.
Kirkpatrick v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 79 N.Y.
240; dist. 43 Hun, 31, and 6 St. Rep. 572, and 25
Week. Dig. 415.
Engineer killed. Staybolts broken and rusty; plates thin.
Fuller v. Jewett, 80 N. Y. 46; dist. 63 Hun, sgr, and 45
St. Rep. 711, and 18 Supp. 609; applied 25 Hun, 146;
dist. 88 N. Y. 146; dist. 85 N. Y. 61.
Boiler had been recently properly tested; exploded under easy
pressure and low speed.
Racine v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 70 Hun, 453; 53
St. Rep. 680; 24 Supp. 388.
Engineer injured. Explosion of gas in fire-box of locomotive.
Defective and coal unfit.
Davis v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 1;
aff'd 15 Civ. Pro. 62, and 2 Silv. 94, and 17 St. Rep.
172, and 110 N. Y. 646; applied 65 Hun, 551, and 48
St. Rep. 916, and 20 Supp. 477.
Fireman killed. Crown sheet collapsed.
Hudson v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 73 Hun, 467; 56 St.
[18]
274 MASTER AND SERVANT.
EXPLOSIONS.
¢
Locomotive boilers.
Rep. 39; 26 Supp. 386; rev. 64 St. Rep. 843, and 145
N. Y. 408.
Fireman killed. Water low.
Leary v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 76 Hun, 575; 58 St.
Rep. 258; 28 Supp. 187.
‘
Stationary boilers. :
Intestate sent by maker who guaranteed boilers to repair them.
Defendants’ engineer started a fire after the repairs.
Olive v. Whitney Marble Co., 3 St. Rep. 66; 103 N. Y.
292.
Boiler purchased from reputable manufacturers, but inferior
iron and rivet holes not properly drilled, nor rivets properly
set.
Ballard v. Hitchcock Mfg. Co., 51 Hun, 188; 21 St.
Rep. 548; 4 Supp. 940; 39 St. Rep. 842; 15 Supp. 405;
71 Hun, 582; 55 St..Rep. 110; 24 Supp, 1101; aff'd
145 N. Y. 619.
Cleaning next boiler. Naphtha probably left in pump, which
was used to pump both naphtha and water. Water pumped
into tubes of boiler to clean.
O’Donnell v. East River Gas Co., 91 Hun, 184; 71 St.
Rep. 124; 36 Supp. 288.
Plaintiff was a hitcher. Hit by piece of exploded boiler. Thin
by corrosion. Hydrostatic test 7 months previously. Claim
that hammer test should have been made.
Egan v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 12 App. Div.
550; 76 St. Rep. 188; 42 Supp. 188.
Same accident.
@illespie v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 12 App.
Div. 501; 76 St. Rep. 425; 42 Supp. 245.
Unclassified.
Laborer cleaning barrels by steam. No steam gauge; barrel
exploded.
Loonam v. Brockway, 3 Robt. 74; 28 How. 472.
Filling clay on boiler with molten iron; it burst.
Moore v. Birdsall Co., 22 Week. Dig. 528.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 275
EXPLOSIONS.
Unclassified.
Emery wheel exploded; improperly built and evidence that it
ran ‘untrue.
Murtaugh v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 49 Hun, 456;
23 St. Rep. 639; 3 Supp. 483.
Laborer went into crude oil still to help riveter. Red-hot
rivets exploded gas leaking in owing to absence of stopcock.
Nichols v. Brush & Denslow Mfg. Co., 53 Hun, 137; 25
St. Rep. 717; 6 Supp. 601; aff’d 117 N. Y. 646.
Dynamite cartridge exploded while being thawed by another
servant.
Stewart v. N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 28 St. Rep. 215;
8 Supp. 19; aff'd 126 N. Y. 631.
Oil pipe burst while intestate was excavating for sewer in a
trench near by.
Lee v. Vacuum Oii Co., 54 Hun, 156; 26 St. Rep. 814;
7 Supp. 426; 38 St. Rep. 662; 126. N. Y. 579; followed
131 N. Y. 204, and 42 St. Rep. 856, and 22 Civ. Pro.
67.
Laborer injured while thawing frozen dynamite cartridges be-
fore a fire in open air.
Lofrano v. N. Y. & Mt. V. Water Co., 55 Hun, 452; 29
St. Rep. 557; 8 Supp. 717; aff'd 130 N. Y. 658.
Intestate was testing radiator bases; new pattern of larger
cross-section exploded.
Moeller v. Brewster, 57 Hun, 554; 33 St. Rep. 743; 11
Supp. 484; 43 St. Rep. 276; 131 N. Y. 606.
Gases in paraffine tank exploded. No instructions not to carry
lighted lantern while lifting cover, to cool tank.
Benfield v. Vacuum Oil Co., 75 Hun, 209; 58 St. Rep.
663; 27 Supp. 16; aff’d 151 N. Y. 671.
Trackman not connected with work of blasting nor running
train injured. Dynamite loaded on construction train;
common car near locomotive; unprotected.
Bernardi v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 454.
Workman in soap factory fastening pipe to pipe from kettle.
Boiling soap suddenly forced out.
Shanley v. Stanley, 39 St. Rep. 368; 15 Supp. 136; 27
J. & S. 495.
276 MASTER AND SERVANT.
EXPLOSIONS.
Unclassified.
Fireman of pitch kettle injured. Kettle leaked and pitch ran.
into fire and caused explosion.
Stapf v. Loewer’s G. Brewing Co., 1 App. Div. 405; 72
St. Rep. 578; 37 Supp. 256; 151 N. Y. 646.
Fireman opened blow-off cock of mud drum of water-tube boil-
ers; pipe exploded.
Sullivan v. Union Ry. Co., 7 App. Div. 238; 40 Supp. 84.
Ignorant Italian boy of 14 received no instructions; dipping
spoons into grease and then into turpentine to clean them.
Heat of spoons ignited turpentine.
Latorre v. Central Stamping Co., 9 App. Div. 145; 41
Supp. 99.
Girl of 18 in canning factory killed. Barrel burst. Cold water
pipe and steam pipe entered barrel; no steam gauge.
Crowell v. Thomas, 90 Hun, 193; 18 App. Div. 520; 70
St. Rep. 651; 35 Supp. 936.
Explosion of pipe in vessel boiler-room. Motion for bill of
particulars.
Manning v. International Nav. Co., 24 App. Div. 143.
FALLING THINGS.
Buildings and doors.
Girl of 14 in mill went to privy which had weak supports and
it fell with her.
Ryan v. Fowler, 24 N. Y. aro.
Door insecurely sustained by ropes; rope broke and door fell
on intestate sitting near.
Williams v. Syracuse Iron Works, 31 Hun, 392; 20
Week. Dig. 188.
Plaster fell on janitress.
White v. Sprague, g St. Rep. 220.
Snow crushed roof in on deceased.
Gaul v. Rochester Paper Co., 72 Hun, 485; 54 St. Rep.
853; 25 Supp. 443; aff'd 145 N. Y. 603.
Stage cleaner opening large stable door; two of three wheels
gone; defendant had notice. Door fell on deceased.
Rettig v. Fifth Ave. Trans. Co., 6 Misc. 328; 56 St. Rep.
235; 26 Supp. 896; aff'd 144 N. Y. 715. if
MASTER AND SERVANT. 277
FALLING THINGS.
Buildings and doors.
Working under defendant in taking down old building. Im-
proper method and it fell.
Rickhoff v. Heckman, 27 St. Rep. 80; 7 Supp. 471.
Plaintiff handing oat lumber in nearly empty lumber stall.
Lumber from adjoining stalls crushed insufficient partition
in and it fell on plaintiff.
Rigdon v. Alleghany Lumber Co., 37 St. Rep. 514; 13
Supp. 871; aff'd 43 St. Rep. 964, and 131 N. Y. 668.
Defendant had contractor for erection of building, but fur-
nished plans, materials and some men. Seventeenth bent
being raised, all fell.
Colelli v. N. J. & P. Concentrating Works, 87 Hun,
428; 68 St. Rep. 461; 34 Supp. 310.
Defendant had contractors for construction. Plans violated
statute of permitted load.
Pitcher v. Lennon, 12 App. Div. 356; 76 St. Rep. 156;
42 Supp. 156; 26 Misc. 609; 74 St. Rep. 817; 38 Supp.
1007.
Ceiling fell on servant in sleeping room.
Siedentop v. Buse, 21 App. Div. 592.
Derricks — derrick cars.
Foreman of derrick car gave order to remove clasp which held
it to the track while derrick had wrecked car in the air.
Plaintiff was workman on derrick car, which was thrown off
the trestle.
Beilfus v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 29 Hun, 556;
dist. 43 St. Rep. 220, and 16 Supp. 840.
Derrick car and girders of temporary construction fell with
plaintiff on car.
Davidson v. Cornell, 31 St. Rep. 982; 10 Supp. 521; rev.
43 St. Rep. 887, and 132 N. Y. 228.
Derrick car sill rotten and broke. Plaintiff thrown from car.
Horrigan v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 7 App. Div.
3773 39 Supp. 938.
Derricks — masts and booms.
Derrick fell on plaintiff while being moved; heavier than the
men assigned could sustain.
Heiner v. Heuvelman, 13 J. & S. 88.
278 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLING THINGS.
Derricks — masts and booms.
Fell on intestate; guy rope insecurely fastened.
Marvin v. Muller, 25 Hun, 163.
Rain caused guy ropes to shrinks legs of derrick not lashed,
slipped, broke plank on which plaintiff stood and threw him
off.
Courtney v. Cornell, 17 J. & S. 286.
Plaintiff moving stone on a truck in stone yard. Boom of der-
rick suddenly lowered on him.
Scott v. Sweeney, 34 Hun, 292; dist. 52 Hun, 12, and 22
St. Rep. 221, and 4 Supp. 704.
Only three guys; one broke and mast fell on plaintiff.
Oties v. Cowles E. S. & A. Co., 26 St. Rep. 869; 7 Supp.
251; aff'd 130 N. Y. 639.
Derrick had no check rope and fell on plaintiff.
Jenkinson v. Carlin, 10 Misc. 22; 62 St. Rep. 643; 30
Supp. 530.
Movable derrick tell on plaintiff.
Kennedy v. Jackson Iron Works, 12 Misc. 336; 67 St.
Rep. 335; 33 Supp. 630.
From chutes and runways.
Clearing away debris after fire; chute fell on plaintiff.
Healey v. Smith, 43 St. Rep. 804; 17 Supp. 851.
Removing debris after fire. Brick came down chute and re-
bounded on plaintiff.
Fannessey v. Western Union T. Co., 6 Misc. 322; 56 St.
Rep. 253; 26 Supp. 796.
Beer keg fell through slide or run upon plaintiff. Rivets and
rods loose.
Mayer v. Liebmann, 16 App. Div. 54; 78 St. Rep. 1067;
@ 44 Supp. 1067; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 760.
Car carrier for parcels in store fell on plaintiff.
Stock v. Le Boutillier, 18 Misc. 349; 75 St. Rep. 649;
41 Supp. 649; aff'd 19 Misc. 112; 1 Am. Neg. Rep.
119.
Hoisting apparatus — hit by slings, ete., falling.
Track repairer on derrick car hit by crank; brake not put on.
Slatterly v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 21 St. Rep.
552; 4 Supp. gio.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 279
FALLING THINGS.
Hoisting apparatus — hit by slings, etc., falling.
Loading vessel. Boards hit combing of hatchway and slipped
from sling on plaintiff.
Kenny v. Cunard S. S. Co., 20 J. & S. 434; 23 J.& S.
558; 14 St. Rep. 851.
Piling bales on dock. Hook too straight and pulled out of
bale, which fell on plaintiff.
Recka v. Ocean S. S. Co., 3 Misc. 526; 52 St. Rep. 417;
23 Supp. 3.
Laborer removing steel plates for vessels. Rim of dog and set-
screw worn. Plate slipped from dog on plaintiff.
Daley v. Union Drv Dock Co., 9 Misc. 394; 61 St. Rep.
686; 29 Supp. 1063.
Barrel fell from sling upon deceased while crossing under
hatchway.
Moy v. Ocean S. S. Co., 12 Mise. 375; 65 St. Rep. 783;
33 Supp. 563.
Unloading vessel. Sling broke and load fell on plaintiff.
Hannigan v. Union Warehouse Co., 3 App. Div. 618;
73 St. Rep. 753; 38 Supp. 272.
Unloading vessel. Plaintiff was directing a draft being raised,
shoved suddenly by one of the defendants and hit by a bale
from behind.
O’Connell v. Clark, 6 App. Div. 33; 39 Supp. 454; 22
App. Div. 466.
Hoisting apparatus — hit by slings, etc., swinging.
Loading vessel. Deceased hit by loaded sling and knocked
into open hatchway.
Hogan v. Hendersen, 2 St. Rep. 119.
Loading vessel. Deceased hit by loaded sling and knocked
into open space.
Hogan v. Smith, 31 St. Rep. 798; 9 Supp. 881; rev. 35
St. Rep. 870, and 3 Silv. 422, and 125 N. Y. 774; fol-
lowed 126 N. Y. 9, and 36 St. Rep. 359.
Unloading vessel. Plaintiff hit by timber in sling; engineer
ordered to go ahead before plaintiff could get away.
Huber v. Wilson, 33 St. Rep. 849; 11 N. Y. Supp. 377.
280 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLING THINGS.
Hoisting apparatus — hit by slings, etc., swinging.
Unloading coal from vessel. Hit by bucket unexpectedly low-
ered.
Smith v. Pennsylvania Coal Co., 45 St. Rep. 371; 18
Supp. 637. : a.
Unloading stone from scow. Bucket swung and knocked
plaintiff off wagon; no tag rope.
McDermott v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 83 Hun, 614;
63 St. Rep. 803; 31 Supp. 388.
Hoisting marble slab; swung against another block of marble
and knocked it over on plaintiff.
Connelly v. Rist, 20 Misc. 31; 79 St. Rep. 321; 45 Supp.
321.
Hit by stone swung on derrick.
Cunningham v. Syracuse Imp. Co., 20 App. Div. 171.
Hoisting apparatus — hooks, etc., broke.
Hook of derrick worn and broke; rail being hoisted fell on
plaintiff.
King v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 4 Hun, 769; rev.
66 N. Y. 181; dist. 25 Hun, 163; 72 N. Y. 607; applied
24 Hun, 12; dist. 48 St. Rep. 20, and 20 Supp. 529;
dist. 87 N. Y. 636; followed 26 Hun, 382.
Hook for hoisting girder gave way and girder fell on plaintiff.
Carlson v. Phoenix Bridge Co., 55 Hun, 485; 29 St. Rep.
553; 8 Supp. 634; aff'd 43 St. Rep. 942, and 132 N. ¥.
273.
Iron laid across hatchway with pulley block to hoist box.
Plaintiff on box pulling on chain when iron broke.
Tomaselli v. Griffiths Cycle Co., 9 App. Div. 127; 75
St. Rep. 509; 41 Supp. 51; dist. 79 St. Rep. 875, and
45 Supp. 875.
Eyebolt in ceiling used to raise a pump pulled out; pump fell
on deceased.
Watts v. Beard, 18 App. Div. 243; 79 St. Rep. 873; 45
Supp. 873.
Hoisting apparatus — ladles and cranes.
No preserver on crane. Traveling bar fell off the end upon
plaintiff.
Oehme v. Cook, 28 St. Rep. 12; 7 Supp. 764; 15 Daly,
381.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 281
FALLING THINGS.
Hoisting apparatus — ladles and cranes.
Chain of crane in foundry broke. Ladle of molten iron poured
on intestate.
Delaney v. Heartt, 32 St. Rep. 499; 10 Supp. 495.
Band of leaking ladle gave way and ladle fell; molten iron
burned plaintiff.
Martin v. Cook, 37 St. Rep. 733; 14 Supp. 329; aff'd 60
St. Rep. 869, and 142 N. Y. 654; followed 39 St. Rep.
783, and 15 Supp. 597.
Gear and worm of crane worn. Molten iron from ladle spilled
on plaintiff.
Scherer v. Holly Mfg. Co., 86 Hun, 37; 66 St. Rep. 833;
33 Supp. 205.
Chain of pulley broke in lifting casting and it fell on deceased.
Lake v. Wendt, 21 App. Div. 276.
Hoisting apparatus — ropes broke.
Servant of stevedore unloading vessel; rope of sling furnished
by defendant broke and load fell on intestate.
Rooney v. Compagnie Gen. Trans., 10 Daly, 241; 12
Week. Dig. 465; Daily Reg., Aug. 17, 1881. ©
Plaintiff on pile driver being transferred when rope broke.
Nelson v. Dubois, 11 Daly, 127; 13 Johns. 175; ques-
tioned 2 Hill, 80; overruled 7 Hill, 416; overruled 19
N. Y. 227.
Plaintiff slinging and hoisting boxes in hatchway of building
hit by iron check weight; rope broke.
Halloran v. Bampton, 7 St. Rep 227.
Dismantling vessel. Rope broke in taking down topmast.
Mikkelsen v. Ocean & Inland T. Co., 31 St. Rep. 408;
g Supp. 741.
Steel cable of derrick used in constructing a sewer broke and
box of material fell.
Probst v. Delamater, 100 N. Y. 266; dist. 43 Hun, 31,
and 6 St. Rep. 572, and 25 Week. Dig. 415; explained
49 Hun, 405, and 3 Supp. 576.
Unloading coal from boat. Rope broke and bucket fell on
intestate.
Cregan v. Marston, 32 St. Rep. 913; 10 Supp. 681; rev.
38 St. Rep. 428, and 126 N. Y. 568.
282 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLING THINGS.
Hoisting apparatus — ropes broke.
Plaintiff had guide rope of hoisted tub of stone; it broke and
he fell off car.
McGourty v. Curran, 34 St. Rep. 494; 11 Supp. 777.
Hoisting apparatus — unclassified.
Drunken dredge captain swung bucket over and struck shaft
plaintiff was turning.
Tonnesen v. Ross, 58 Hun, 415; 35 St. Rep. 271; 12 °
Supp. 150.
Same accident.
Thompson v. Ross, 58 Hun, 415 n.; 35 St. Rep. 273;
12 Supp. 151; aff'd 132 N. Y. 595; followed 35 St.
Rep. 271, and 12 Supp. 151.
Lifting.
Foreman moved cope with bar throwing more weight from
crane to men holding it; it fell on plaintiff working near.
Smith v. Bispham, 20 J. & S. 33.
Insufficient number of men removing hatch of vessel; it slipped
and fell on plaintiff below.
Hussey v. Coger, 39 Hun, 639; 9 St. Rep. 340; rev. 21
St. Rep. 848, and 112 N. Y. 614; dist. 24 St. Rep. 103,
and 1 Silv. 510, and 5 Supp. 523; dist. 29 St. Rep. 7o1,
and 9 Supp. 174; dist. 31 St. Rep. 801, and 9 Supp.
881; dist. 43 St. Rep. 220, and 16 Supp. 840.
Lifting heavy, large boxes of glass. One fell on plaintiff.
Evidence of not enough men to handle it.
Alberts v. Bache, 32 St. Rep. 1014; 10 Supp. 639; 69
Hun, 255; 53 St. Rep. 230; 23 Supp. 502.
Iron chigper at work on heavy casting on truck. He moved it
by means of a stick; it struck a wedge holding it, which was
cross-grained; wedge broke and casting fell on plaintiff.
McGoldrick v. Metcalf, 37 St. Rep. 611; 14 Supp. 269;
44 St. Rep. 476; 18 Supp. 169.
Lifting rail; fell on plaintiff.
Murray v. Crimmins, 14 Misc. 466; 70 St. Rep. 727; 35
as Supp. 1023.
Sliding stones down a “
run.” Plaintiff knocked roller
MASTER AND SERVANT. 283
FALLING THINGS.
Lifting.
straight ; rope loose; stone started suddenly; plaintiff caught
by roller.
Barry v. Crimmins, 23 App. Div. 272.
Loading and unloading.
Loading car wheels on car; jigger out of repair; it fell and pair -
of wheels fell on plaintiff.
Kain v. Smith, 11 Hun, 552; rev. 80 N. Y. 458; 23 Hun,
126; dist. 54 Hun, 243, and 28 St. Rep. 301, and 8
Supp. 515; 25 Hun, 146; 89 N. Y. 375; dist. 109 N. Y.
499, and 16 St. Rep. 423.
Gravel cars being unloaded by steam plow. Stone raised plow,
which fell on plaintiff.
De Vau v. Pennsylvania & N. Y. C. & R. R. Co., 27 St.
Rep. 573; 7 Supp. 692; rev. 40 St. Rep. 487, and 3
Silv. 562, and 130 N. Y. 632.
Unloading rails. Plaintiff caught foot in rail projecting from
next car because drawhead gone and chain used which short-
ened space between cars.
Lucco v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 87 Hun, 612; 68
St. Rep. 156; 34 Supp. 277. ©
Loading rails on both sides of car. One rail slid off the other
side and hit plaintiff. No stakes at side of car.
Ely v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 88 Hun, 323; 68 St.
Rep. 558; 34 Supp. 739.
Piles fell over.
Laborer taking bricks from a pile; pile cracked and boards
covering top of pile slid off on plaintiff.
Riley v. O’Brien, 53 Hun, 147; 24 St. Rep. 720; 6 Supp.
129.
Pile of rolls of cloth fell on plaintiff working near,
Stephens v. Hudson Valley Knitting Co., 48 St. Rep.
814; 20 Supp. 416; 69 Hun, 375; 52 St. Rep. 795; 23
Supp. 656; aff'd 60 St. Rep. 875, and 143 N. Y. 633.
Bales in warehouse improperly tiered fell on plaintiff.
McFadden v. Campbell, 13 Misc. 158; 68 St. Rep. 183;
34 Supp. 136.
284 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLING THINGS.
Small articles dropped.
Brick fell from upper story of building being constructed.
Daley v. Schaaf, 28 Hun, 314; 16 Week. Dig. 313.
Building being constructed. Deceased, preparing mortar, was
hit by something falling from upper story, where bricklayers
were at work.
Ford v. Lyons, 41 Hun, 512; 4 St. Rep. 59; 25 Week.
Dig. 39.
Boss blacksmith threw compound on iron without warning and
a liquid particle flew into eye of a journeyman blacksmith.
McCarragher v. Gaskell, 42 Hun, 451; 6 St. Rep. 87; 25
Week. Dig. 527.
Wire of carpet loom hit weaver in the eye.
Daly v. Smith Carpet Co., 69 Hun, 77.
Spicula from axe hit by sledge flew into plaintiff’s eye.
Mulligan v. Crimmins, 75 Hun, 578; 58 St. Rep. 737;
27 Supp. 819; aff'd 149 N. Y. 594.
Building being constructed. Plaintiff’s son, a rivet heater, hit
by something falling from upper floor, where servants of
independent contractor were at work.
Evans v. Vogt & Bros.’ Mfg. Co., 5 Misc. 330; 55 St.
Rep. 212; 25 Supp. 509.
Fellow-servant opening scuttle on roof over elevator shaft;
hammer slipped from his hand and fell on plaintiff ascending
in elevator.
Shields v. Robins, 12 Misc. 332; 65 St. Rep. 788; 33.
Supp. 639; 3 App. Div. 582; 73 St. Rep. 708; 38 Supp.
214.
Defendant hired horse and plaintiff to hoist. Plaintiff sent to:
warehouse and pulley block fell on him.
Murray v. Dwight, 15 App: Div. 241; 78 St. Rep. 234;
44g5upp. 234; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 206.
Intestate crawled through elevator shaft instead of going’
around by a passage, and was hit by a roller dropped while
unloading elevator.
Hoes v. Edison G. E. Co., 23 App. Div. 433; 3 Ann.
Cas. 247; 150 N. Y. 87.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 285
FALLING THINGS.
Timber and planks.
Pile of lumber on car without brackets for stakes as usual.
Jolting of switches caused load to fall on switchman tend-
ing his switch.
Ford v. L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co., 17 St. Rep. 393; 2
Supp. 1; rev. 27 St. Rep. 246, and 2 Silv. 460, and
117 N. Y. 638; dist. 45 St. Rep. 158, and 18 Supp.
841; 36 St. Rep. 494; 124 N. Y. 493; dist. 61 Hun,
14, and 4o St. Rep. 26, and 15 Supp. 384.
In taking down:-scaffold on upper floor, plank fell down on
deceased on lower floor. Evidence that scaffold was in-
sufficiently braced.
O’Dea v. Norcross, 22 Week. Dig. 516; 104 N. Y.
647.
Assisting in hoisting tank through a window in front of
which was a scaffold used for another purpose. Tank
improperly fastened by hoisting ropes; it turned, hit scaf-
fold and knocked loose plank down upon plaintiff.
Bagley v. Consolidated Gas Co., 13 Misc. 6; 68 St.
Rep. 237; 34 Supp. 187; 5 App. Div. 432; 39 Supp.
302.
Unclassified.
Vessel slipped and fell over on plaintiff.
Hart v. N. Y. Floating Dry Dock Co., 5 Month. L.
Bul. 67; 16 J. & S. 460:
Shipvard. Plaintiff at work under scaffold when it fell. Too
much weight on scaffold or spalls swayed from men on it
riveting and driving bolts.
Connolly v. Poillon, 41 Barb. 366; 1 Alb. L. J. 99.
Defendant had contractor to build culvert, but furnished ma-
terials. Wooden centers used. Defendants’ foreman,
carpenter and gang, upon request of contractor, was strik-
ing a center when arch fell on deceased, a carpenter, be-
cause mortar not dry.
Hoffnagle v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co, 1 T. & C.
346; rev. 55 N. Y. 608.
Posts gave way and a mash tub fell on laborer.
Malone v. Hathaway, 2 T. & C. 664; 3 Hun, 553; 6
T. & C. 1; rev. 64 N. Y. 5; followed 11 Hun, 591;
286 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLING THINGS.
Unclassified.
followed 16 Hun, 212; approved 80 N. Y. 53; com-
pared 19 Hun, 219; dist. 18 J. & S. 341.
Guardrail of pier fell on watchman.,
Upton v. Bartlett, 37 St. Rep. 193; 13 Supp. 451.
Raising ice runway, it fell on plaintiff.
Klupp v. United Ice Lines, 39 St. Rep. 782; 15 Supp.
597; aff'd 133 N. Y. 666.
Bucket in shaft fell on plaintiff. Mine or tunnel for aqueduct.
Boardman v. Brown, 44 Hun, 336; 8 St. Rep. 850;
followed 15 St. Rep. 1o10, and 1 Supp. 360.
Two boys of 14 and 15 sawing logs on steep bank. When
log was sawed through, one part rolled on deceased.
Skaarup v. Stover, 56 Hun, 86; 29 St. Rep. 647; 9
Supp. 92.
Leg of table in boiler shop crushed through rotten floor.
Boiler sheets slid off on plaintiff’s leg.
Ryan v. Porter Mfg. Co., 57 Hun, 253; 32 St. Rep.
621; 10 Supp. 774; dist. 43 St. Rep. 840, and 17
Supp. 692.
Plaintiff at work on building near a tree which defendant was.
taking down. It fell on plaintiff.
McGonigle v. Canty, 80 Hun, 301; 62 St. Rep. 48; 30
Supp. 320.
Relaying floor in hold of vessel. Deceased was painting
underneath. Floor fell on him.
Smith v. Empire Transportation Co., 89 Hun, 588;
70 St. Rep. 120; 35 Supp. 534.
Foreman failed to properly secure a certain heavy iron to a
truck and it fell over on plaintiff.
Ludlow v. Groton Bridge Co., 71 St. Rep. 510; 36
Supp. 452; 16 Misc. 222; 73 St. Rep. 292; 37 Supp.
595; 11 App. Div. 452; 76 St. Rep. 343; 42 Supp-
343-
FALLS.
From places — cars — brake broke.
Brake chain broke.
DeGraff v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 76 N. Y. 125;
3 T. & C. 255; dist. 28 Hun, 364; dist. 25 Hun, 146.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 287
FALLS.
From places — cars — brake broke.
Brake rod pulled up from stirrup; key or pin gone. Fell under
train.
Bailey v. R., W. & O. R. R!: Co., 49 Hun, 377; 19 St.
Rep. 656; 3 Supp. 585; dist. 36 St. Rep. 68, and 13
Supp. 24; 55 Hun, 509; 29 St. Rep. 755; 8 Supp.
780; 80 Hun, 4; 61 St. Rep. 490; 29 Supp. 816; 54
St. Rep. 550; 139 N. Y. 302.
Eyebolt improperly welded, broke.
Painton v. Northern Central Ry. Co., 83 N. Y. 7.
Four out of six spokes were broken. Rim came off. Run
over.
Pratt v. L. S. & M..S. Ry. Co., 63 Hun, 616; 45 St.
Rep. 715; 18 Supp. 682; aff’d 49 St. Rep. 915, and
136 N. Y. 654.
Brake guard snapped. One bolt off and the two others loose
under the car.
O’Malley v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 67 Hun,
130; 51 St. Rep. 366; 22 Supp. 48; aff’d 60 St. Rep.
871, and 142 N. Y. 655.
Spokes of brake-wheel broke; rim came off.
Disher v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 2 St. Rep. 276;
aff'd 22 St. Rep. 1000, and 94 N. Y. 622.
Chain bolt pulled through brake rod.
Fahy v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 36 St. Rep. 67; 13
Supp. 24; aff'd 128 N. Y. 677.
Defective brake.
Shambow v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 39 St. Rep.
367; 15 Supp. 146.
Brake brace loose.
Hotis v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 25 St. Rep. 525;
6 Supp. 605; 2 Sil. S. C. 598; appeal discontinued
119 N. Y. 627; dist. 48 St. Rep. 774, and 20 Supp.
709.
Brake step defective; brake. Brakeman fell astride of engine
bumper.
Van Tassell v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 1 Misc.
299; 48 St. Rep. 767; 20 Supp. 708; aff'd 60 St. Rep.
867, and 142 N. Y. 634.
288
Fro
MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLS.
m places — cars — brake broke.
Nut on top of brake staff which held the lever fast to it gone.
Hayden v. Platt, 84 Hun, 487; 65 St. Rep. 875; 32
Supp. 1144. .
Eye bolt at lower end of brake shaft broke. Run over.
Eaton v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 14 App. Div. 20;
77 St. Rep. 666; 43 Supp. 666; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 402.
From places — cars — unclassified.
Shoveler fell from gravel train and was run over.
Forey v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 12 St. Rep.
198; aff'd 34 St. Rep. 1015, and 122 N. Y. 667.
Timber on car insecure. Brakeman stepped on stick which
turned and threw him off.
Miller v.N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 656.
Driver thrown off by rail spreading; excavation near.
Dibb v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 16 St. Rep.
922; 1 Supp. 640.
Thrown from hand car by defective crank.
Barringer v. D. & H. C. Co., 19 Hun, 216; dist. 21
Hun, 200.
Defective ladder on freight car.
Jones v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 22 Hun, 284; 62
How. Pr. 450; 10 Abb. N. C. 200; 92 N. Y. 628;
aff'd 28 Hun, 364; harmonized 6 St. Rep. 370.
Pick-handle used for hand car beam; it broke and threw de-
ceased off.
Powers v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 32 Hun, 415;
98 N. Y. 274; applied 15 Daly, 26, and 16 St. Rep.
693, and 1 Supp. 273; dist. 6 St. Rep. 25, and 25
Week. Dig. 21; dist. 25 Week. Dig. 24; followed 46
St. Rep. 454, and 19 Supp. 789.
Unloading gravel train; engine backed and deceased thtown
off.
Campbell v.N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 35 Hun, 506;
19 St. Rep. 659; 3 Supp. 694; aff’d rar N. Y. 669.
Stake at side of freight car broke; load and plaintiff fell.
Bushby v. N. Y., L. E.& W. R. R. Co., 37 Hun, 104;
aff'd 12 St. Rep. 9, and 27 Week. Dig. 393, and 107
N. Y. 374; applied 45 St. Rep. 156, and 18 Supp. 841;
MASTER AND SERVANT. 289
FALLS.
From places — cars — unclassified.
dist. 117 N. Y. 639, and 27 St. Rep. 246, and 2 Silv.
460; dist. 14 St. Rep. 657.
Conductor walked off end car in Fourth avenue tunnel. Dark
and no chain.
Fiero v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 71 Hun, 213; 54
St. Rep. 373; 24 Supp. 805.
Other brakeman signalled to back; sudden jerk threw plaintiff
off.
Cole v. R., W. & O. R: R. Co., 72 Hun, 467; 55 St. Rep.
245; 25 Supp. 276.
Trap of loaded coal car gave way. New car was out of order.
Shields v.N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 39 St. Rep. 750;
15 Supp. 613; rev. 44 St. Rep. 72, and 133 N. Y. 557.
Thrown off by car in street running into open switch.
Donnelly v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 3 App. Div. 408; 74
St. Rep. 169; 38 Supp. 709; 7 App. Div. 408; 78 St.
Rep. 169; 38 Supp. 709.
Wheel of hand car broke and car upset.
Shortsleeves v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 9 App. Div.
622; 75 St. Rep. 425; 40 Supp. 1105.
Working on car which suddenly dumped.
Soderman v. Kemp, 65 St. Rep. 352; 145 N. Y. 427.
Same case continued sub nom.,
Soderman v. Troy S. & I. Co., 70 Hun, 449; 53 St. Rep.
678; 24 Supp. 4o1; rev. 145 N. Y. 427, and 65 St. Rep.
352.
From places — telegraph poles.
Telegraph pole fell while plaintiff was on it.
Byron v. N. Y. S. P. & Tel. Co., 26 Barb. 39.
Cross-arm broke and lineman fell from pole.
Flood v. Western Un. Tel. Co., 39 St. Rep. 674; 15
Supp. 400; rev. 43 St. Rep. 302, and 131 N. Y. 603.
Stringing wire; evebolt broke and lineman thrown from pole.
Doyle v. White, 14 Misc. 417; 70 St. Rep. 417; 35 Supp.
760; aff'd o App. Div. 521, and 75 St. Rep. 1025, and
41 Supp. 628.
[x9]
290 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLS.
From places — unclassified.
Fell from hoisting apparatus.
Giese v. Hall, 37 Hun, 440.
Stacking ice; hook dull and plaintiff slipped and fell.
_ Thorn v. N. Y. Ice Co., 46 Hun, 497; 11 St. Rep. 845;
27 Week. Dig. 464.
Ignorant person set to run engine; fell from step upon flywheel.
Slacer v. Field Eng. Co., 4 Misc. 493; 54 St. Rep. 335;
24 Supp. 550.
Fell from runway ; leg of horse of runway sunk into ground.
Reilly v. Parker, 11 Misc. 68; 65 St. Rep. 108; 31 Supp.
1014.
Unloading coal; slipped from keelson.
Foley v. Brooklyn Gaslight Co., 9 App. Div. 91; 75 St.
Rep. 526; 41 Supp. 66.
Infant fell from pile of lumber.
Murphy v. Bennett, 11 App. Div. 298; 76 St. Rep. 61;
42 Supp. 61.
Into places — elevator shafts.
Boy of 15 sent to hoist to see who rang; looked up, slipped and
fell down.
Brenstein v. Mattson, 10 Daly, 330.
Dark ; mistook door of elevator shaft for door of stairway and
walked in.
Pfeiffer v. Ringler, 12 Daly, 437.
Working near elevator shaft with but one bar; part of machine
he was moving gave way, and deceased fell under bar down
shaft.
Rogen v. Enoch Morgan’s Sons Co., 16 St. Rep. 693;
® 1 Supp. 273; 15 Dely, 25.
Brought down elevator, went around corner and walked back-
wards with truck; elevator gone and he fell.
‘Kossmann v. Stutz, 5 Supp. 764.
Elevator boy of 17 left elevator for a few moments. Elevator
moved. He stepped back without looking into shaft.
Dieboldt v. U. S. Baking Co., 72 Hun, 403; 55 St. Rep.
285; 25 Supp. 205; 81 Hun, 195; 62 St. Rep. 728; 30
Supp. 745.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 291
FALLS.
Into places — elevator shafts.
Got off elevator, talked, walked back and fell. Elevator gone.
Guenther v. Lockhart, 4o St. Rep. 942; 16 Supp. 717;
aff'd 50 St. Rep. 930, and 137 N. Y. 529.
Building being constructed. Deceased ascending in elevator ;
it caught on some planks over shaft and started to fall; de-
ceased jumped out, but fell back into shaft.
White v. Eidlitz, 19 App. Div. 256.
Operative saw door open and elevator man at its side, and
walked ahead into elevator shaft.
Simmons v. Peters, 85 Hun, 93; 66 St. Rep. 64; 32 Supp.
680; 20 App. Div. 252.
Into places — hatches, trap-doors and hoistways.
’ Deceased returning from dinner fell into open hhatchway in
front of entrance door.
Karl v. Maillard, 3 Bosw. 591.
Fell down open hatchway.
Heidinger v. Hine, 18 Week. Dig. 404.
Trap door in factory suddenly thrown open and plaintiff fell
through.
Anthony v. Leeret, 35 Hun, 663; 8 St. Rep. 542; 4
Supp. 676; 26 Week. Dig. 469; 20 St. Rep. 620; 105
N. Y. 591.
On opening warehouse, deceased fell into hatchway that
should have been closed.
McCoy v. Empire Warehouse Co., 31 St. Rep. 815; 10
Supp. 99; aff’d 125 N. Y. 764.
Into places — holes.
Crossing R. R. bridge on business; fell through.
Higgins v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 22 Week. Dig.
265; 2 Bosw. 132; 78 Hun, 567; 61 St. Rep. 244; 29
Supp. 563.
Caught foot in refuse hole in factory.
Burns v. Bostwick, 5 St. Rep. 50; 25 Week. Dig. 217.
Passing from locomotive to car, stepped on unfastened man-
hole cover and fell in.
McQuigan v, D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 651;
rev. 122 N. Y. 618, and 34 St. Rep. 618; 129 N. Y.
50; 41 St. Rep. 382; 21 Civ. Pro. 396.
292 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLS.
Into places — holes.
Workman in building being constructed fell down large hole
in flooring.
Schwartz v. Cornell, 36 St. Rep. 646; 13 Supp. 355;
dist. 61 Hun, 131, and 39 St. Rep. 621, and 15 Supp.
657.
Carpenter erecting cattle stalls on vessel. Left tools with
engineer in boiler over night. Next morning in going after
them he fell into bunker hole.
Belford v. Canada Shipping Co., 35 Hun, 347.
Janitress fell into hole in cellar.
Spengeman v. Alter, 7 Misc. 61; 57 St. Rep. 82; 27
Supp. 406.
Foot in depression of plank on a platform; unlighted.
Kaare v. Troy S. & I. Co., 46 St. Rep. 451; 19 Supp.
789; rev. 54 St. Rep. 653, and 139 N. Y. 369.
Cleaner stepped off car into unguarded hole in platform.
Kennedy v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 33 Hun, 457; 56 St.
Rep. 883; 25 Supp. 1123; rev. 64 St. Rep. 705, and
145 N. Y. 288; dist. 31 St. Rep. 799, and g Supp. 881.
Platform in mine being built; fell through hole in it.
Sharpsteen v. Livonia Salt & M. Co., 3 App. Div. 144;
74 St. Rep. 479; 38 Supp. 49.
Foot in rotten plank in trestle; car ran over hand.
Kern v. Burden Iron Co., 17 App. Div. 135; 79 St.
Rep. 152; 45 Supp. 152; 3 Am. Neg. Rep. 82.
Into places — skylights.
Removing snow from roof; fell through skylight.
Reinig v. Broadway R. R. Co., 49 Hun, 269; 17 3t
Rep. 622; 1 Supp. 907.
Fell through skylight of roof.
Garety v. King, 9 App. Div. 443; 75 St. Rep. 1030; 41
Supp. 633.
Plaintiff fell through glass floor over shaft; covered with dirt.
Rafferty v. Central Park, N. & E. R. R. R. Co., 14
Misc. 560; 70 St. Rep. 693; 35 Supp. 1067.
Into places —tanks, vats and bins.
Fell into uncovered hot syrup tank.
Riceman v. Havemeyer, 84 N. Y. 647.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 293
FALLS.
Into places — tanks, vats and bins.
Shoveling in sugar bin; drawn down.
Bohn v. Havemeyer, 46 Hun, 557; 12 St. Rep. 589; 28
Week. Dig. 7; aff’d 23 St. Rep. 239, and 114 N. Y.
206. i
Shoveling sticky grain in bin; it fell and plaintiff drawn down.
McGovern v. Central Vermont R. R. Co., 24 St. Rep.
946; 6 Supp. 838; rev. 33 St. Rep. 416, and 123 N.
N. 280; dist. 126 N. Y. 8, and 36 St. Rep. 359; dist.
39 St. Rep. 125, and 14 Supp. 932; dist. 47 St. Rep.
296, and 19 Supp. 900; followed 39 St. Rep. 696, and
15 Supp. 609.
Feeding liquor to vats; fell in.
Heavey v. Hudson River W. P. & P. Co., 57 Hun, 339;
32 St. Rep. 565; 10 Supp. 585.
Infant in salt bin; drawn through.
Eastwood v. Retsof Mining Co., 86 Hun, 91; 68 St. Rep.
213, and 43 Supp. 213; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 144.
Into places — vessel hatchways.
Unloading vessel; fell through hatchway.
Flaherty v. Henderson, 15 Week. Dig. 102.
Unloading vessel ; fell into hatchway.
Britt v. Alexandre, Daily Reg. 27 December, 1882; 15
Week. Dig. 443.
Went to close ports; boilers lying on deck; fell into hatchway
in passing them. ,
Andersen v. N. Y. & Cuba M.S. S. Co., 17 Misc. 93; 39
Supp. 425; rev. 13 App. Div. 218, and 77 St. Rep.
213, and 43 Supp. 213; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 144.
Into places — unclassified.
Fell down unlighted stairs in workshop.
Michaels v. Levison, 2 City Ct. 411.
Things giving way — ladders.
Rung of ladder broke.
Ryan v. Miller, 17 Week. Dig. 112; 12 Daly, 77; aff'd
99 N. Y. 665.
294 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLS.
Things giving way — ladders.
Old ladder split and gave way.
Myles v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R, R. Co., 6 St. Rep. 24.
Ladder broke while lighting lamp in street.
Marsh v. Chickering, 25 Hun, 405; rev. 101 N: Y. 396;
dist. 6 St. Rep. 25, and 25 Week. Dig. 21; dist. 14 St.
Rep. 653; dist. 17 St. Rep. 395, and 2 Supp. 1; dist. 39
St. Rep. 720, and 15 Supp. 598; followed 103 N. Y.
318, and 3 St. Rep. 96, and 25 Week. Dig. 5; followed
46 Hun, 498, and 11 St. Rep. 845, and 27 Week. Dig.
404.
Deceased was removing loose rock in mine when a ladder
slipped and fell on him.
Donnelly v. Brown, 43 Hun, 470.
Rung turned with hod-carrier.
McGrath v. Walsh, 23 St. Rep. 63; 4 Supp. 705; 15
Daly, 210; dist. 15 Daly, 289, and 25 St. Rep. 749,
and 6 Supp. 517.
Wooden slat of ladder broke.
Shorning v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 38 St. Rep. 27; 13
Supp. 434.
Insecurely fastened ; it fell.
Quinn v. Fish, 6 Misc. 105; 55 St. Rep. 401; 26 Supp.
10.
Things giving way — platforms, stairs, etc.
Ice runway fell while plaintiff on it to close door.
Rossman v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 23 Week. Dig. 445.
Platform over mine fell with plaintiff on it.
Lyon v. Port Henry I. O. Co., 24 Week. Dig. 15.
Overloaded floor of stable fell with plaintiff.
Dillon v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co., 14 J. & S. 21; 16 J. &S.
283; 97 N. Y. 627; dist. 46 St. Rep. 876, and 19 Supp.
705.
Driver on lumber train; platform gave way with load and de-
ceased.
Murray v. Usher, 46 Hun, 404; 11 St. Rep. 789; 27
Week. Dig. 411; aff'd 27 St. Rep. 928, and 117 N. Y.
542.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 295
FALLS.
Things giving way — platforms, stairs, ete.
End of plank of planking over sewer unsupported ; plaintiff fell
through.
McCormack v. Crawford, 4 St. Rep. 835.
Plank-walk in coal yard fell with plaintiff on it.
McCarthy v. Thorn, 25 St. Rep. 369; 5 Supp. 917.
Erecting iron building. Raising girder with derrick which
was on a platform; platform gave way with plaintiff.
Roach vy. Jackson Arch. I. Works, 14 St. Rep. 583; dist.
24 St. Rep. 104, and 1 Silv. 510, and 5 Supp. 523.
Stairway in factory fell with plaintiff on it.
Tendrup v. John Stephenson Co., 51 Hun, 462; 21 St.
Rep. 487; 3 Supp. 882; 121 N. Y. 681.
Unloading coal on trestle; wagon drove into trestle, and later
it broke with plaintiff on it.
Selleck v. Langdon & Co., 55 Hun, 19; 28 St. Rep. 326;
8 Supp. 573; 37 St. Rep. 511; 13 Supp. 855; aff'd 133
N. Y. 535.
Platform at switchboard of ice runway fell with plaintiff.
Teetsel v. Simmons, 88 Hun, 621; 69 St. Rep. 353; 34
Supp. 972.
House being constructed. Laborer on floor when beams
gave way and floor fell.
Flynn v. Harlow, 46 St. Rep. 872; 19 Supp. 705.
Plaintiff directed to pass over a plank, which broke.
Butterworth v. Clarkson, 3 Misc. 338.
Things giving way — scaffolds.
Scaffold fell with plaintiff; built by incompetent men under
direction of intoxicated foreman.
Laning v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 49 N. Y. 521; applied 4
Hun, 770; applied 79 N. Y. 245; applied 1 T. & C.
350; explained 3 T. & C. 257; explained 5 Hun, 494;
applied 53 N. Y. 552; applied 55 N. Y. 583; which
rev. 1 T. & C. 526; applied 21 Hun, 500; dist. 64
N. Y. 9; dist. 70 N. Y. 174; dist. N. Y. Daily Reg.,
Jan. 26, 1884; applied 91 N. Y. 495; applied g1 N. Y.
332; dist. 69 N. Y. 462; applied 17 Hun, 118; applied
25 Hun, 405.
296 MASTER AND SERVANT.
FALLS.
Things giving way — scaffolds.
Same accident.
Brickner v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 2 Lans. 506; aff’d 49 N.
Y. 672; explained 62 Barb. 218.
Painting ship. Rope slipped and scaffold fell with plaintiff.
Pickett v. Atlas S. S. Co., 1 City Ct. Supp. 48; 12 Daly,
441.
Scaffold for scraping building insecurely fastened, swung out
and plaintiff fell.
Henry v. Brady, 11 Week. Dig. 361; 9 Daly, 142; 83
N. Y. 619.
Contractor to build bridge furnished labor and materials, but
hired defendant, who was a skilful builder, to erect it. De-
fendant erected scaffold; stay laths were removed from this,
and scaffold fell with plaintiff on it.
Fort v. Whipple, 11 Hun, 586.
Scaffold fell with deceased.
Manning v. Hogan, 78 N. Y. 615.
Painter contractor had contractor to build scaffold. Painters
on it when it fell.
Devlin v. Smith, 25 Hun, 206; 11 Abb. N. C. 322; 89
N. Y. 470; dist. 14 St. Rep. 188, and 28 Week. Dig. 2;
followed 126 N. Y. 109, and 36 St. Rep. 508; followed
65 Hun, 576, and 48 St. Rep. 596, and 20 Supp. 523.
Scaffold fell; defendant and plaintiff had knowledge of inse-
curity.
' Eiser v. Archer, 1 Rob. C. C. 356.
Plaintiff dumped bricks on scaffold and it fell.
Green v. Banta, 16 J. & S. 156; aff'd 97 N. Y. 627.
Overloaded scaffold broke with plaintiff.
Flynn v. Gallagher, 20 J. & S. 524. ;
Knot iff board of scaffold to erect roof; plaintiff called from
other work; went on it and it fell.
Benzing v. Steinway & Sons, ror N. Y. 547: applied
123 N. Y. 4, and 33 St. Rep. 46; applied 7 St. Rep.
228; dist. 44 Hun, 74, and 7 St. Rep. 444, and 26
Week. Dig. tor.
Helper carrying shingles; shingling scaffold gave way.
- Weiler v. Isley, 6 St. Rep. 595; 25 Week. Dig. 398.
MASTER' AND SERVANT. 297
FALLS.
Things giving way — scaffolds.
Riveter on scaffold; knot in scantling caused scaffold to fall.
Hogan v. Field, 44 Hun, 72; 7 St. Rep. 444; 26 Week.
Dig. 191.
Staging to remove counter-weights of lift bridge fell with plain-
tiff.
Culligan v. Jones, 14 St. Rep. 186; 28 Week. Dig. 2.
Condemned plank in scaffold broke with deceased.
Butler v. Townsend, 32 St. Rep. 1055; 10 Supp. 809;
aff'd 36 St. Rep. 508, and 126 N. Y. 105.
Plank on valley roof holding scaffold not tied; scaffold fell with
plaintiff.
Chadwick v. Brewsher, 39 St. Rep. 718; 15 Supp. 598.
Scaffold on inside of oil tank for cutting tank down fell‘ with
plaintiff.
Crebarry v. National Transit Co., 77 Hun, 74; 59 St.
Rep. 836; 2&8 Supp. 291.
Scaffold for slating roof fell with deceased.
Kuhn v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 77 Hun, 389; 60 St.
Rep. 406; 28 Supp. 83; 92 Hun, 74; 71 St. Rep. 233;
36 Supp. 339; aff’d 153 N. Y. 683.
Reconstructing brewery. Masons erected scaffold on scaffold
left by plumbers. It fell with plaintiff.
Kimmer v. Weber, 81 Hun, 599; 63 St. Rep. 291; 30
Supp. 1103; rev. 151 N. Y. 418; 1 Am. Neg. Rep. 156.
Scaffold fell with plaintiff ; foreman had furnished it defective.
Oellerich v. Hayes, 8 Misc. 211; 59 St. Rep. 221; 28
Supp. 579.
Same accident.
Richards v. Hayes, 12 Misc. 44; 66 St. Rep. 529; 33
Supp. 30; 17 App. Div. 422; 79 St. Rep. 234; 45
Supp. 234; 3 Am. Neg. Rep. 267.
Scaffold left by independent contractors fell when plaintiff went
on it to get to his work.
Whallon v. Sprague El. Elevator Co., 1 App. Div. 264;
; 72 St. Rep. 519; 37 Supp. 174.
Large knot in joist; roofer’s helper on scaffold when it fell.
Bryer v. Foerster, 9g App. Div. 542; 75 St. Rep. 1013;
41 Supp. 617; 14 App. Div. 315; 77 St. Rep. 801; 43
Supp. 801.
298 MASTER AND SERVANT,
FALLS.
Things giving way — scaffolds.
Erecting armory. Scaffold fell with plaintiff.
McCone v. Gallagher, 9 App. Div. 632; 78 St. Rep.
1123; 44 Supp. 1123; 16 App. Div. 272; 78 St. Rep.
697; 44 Supp. 697; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 613.
Hooks for holding painters’ scaffold broke; deceased on scaf-
fold.
Rollings v. Levering, 18 App. Div. 223; 79 St. Rep.
942; 45 Supp. 942.
Fell with scaffold.
Phalen v. Phalen, 21 App. Div. 603.
Things giving way — unclassified.
Putting tank in place. Plank on which plaintiff was standing
broke.
Mahoney v. Vacuum Oil Co., 76 Hun, 579; 58 St. Rep.
279; 28 Supp. 196; followed 62 St. Rep. 871, and 29
Supp. 1142.
Plaintiff standing on a plank resting on cross timbers; timbers.
broke.
Ernst v. Brown Hoisting & C. Co., 4 Misc. 450; 54 St.
Rep. 260; 24 Supp.-359; aff'd 64 St. Rep. 866, and
144 N. Y. 331.
Canal bridge fell with plaintiff on it making repairs.
Gates v. State of New York, 40 St. Rep. 87; 128 N. Y.
221.
Carpenter stepped on tie beam, which had a knot in it, and it
gave way.
Griffiths v. N. J. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 5 Misc. 320; 25
Supp. 812; 8 Misc. 3; 59 St. Rep. 303; 28 Supp. 75;
aff'd 149 N. Y. 595.
Cross beams fastened to elevated R. R. to support trolley
trough. Deceased was sitting on beam when it broke; knot
or curl in interior.
Stourbridge v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 9 App. Div.
129; 75 St. Rep. 586; 41 Supp. 128.
Steps of wagon insecure; fell from wagon.
McCabe v. Brairiard, 17 App. Div. 45; 78 St. Rep. 964;
44 Supp. 964.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 299
FIRES.
Vessel loaded with petroleum caught fire and deceased was
burned.
McDonald v. Mallory, 12 J. & S. 80; rev. 77 N. Y. 546;
approved 84 N. Y. 48; 14 J. &S.58;7 Abb. N.C. 84;
followed 126 N. Y. 14, and 36 St. Rep. 387.
No fire escape from fifth floor and no ladder to roof.
Schwander v. Birge, 33 Hun, 186; 46 Hun, 66; 10 St.
Rep. 802; 27 Week. Dig. 254; applied 118 N. Y. 430,
and 29 St. Rep. 790; dist. 55 Hun, 514, and 29 St.
Rep. 755, and 8 Supp. 780.
Boy of 18 caught by sudden fire in blow-room of knitting mill.
Clement v. Rankin Knitting Co., 20 St. Rep. 196; 3
Supp. 169.
Jumped from window; no fire escape.
Gorman v. McArdle, 67 Hun, 484; 51 St. Rep. 248; 22
Supp. 479.
One fire escape barred by iron shutters; the other ended in a
chute; dropped off the end.
Pauley v. Steam Gauge & L. Co., 61 Hun, 254; 40 St.
Rep. 855; 16 Supp. 820; rev. 42 St. Rep. 636, and
131 N. Y. go.
Same accident.
Johnson v. Steam Gauge & L. Co., 72 Hun, 535; 55 St.
Rep. 133; 25 Supp. 689; aff'd 66 St. Rep. 276, and
146 N. Y. 152.
Fire escapes, but frail windows fastened.
Pzepka v. American Glucose Co., 11 Misc. 131; 65 St.
Rep. 112; 31 Supp. 1019.
Same accident.
Huda v. American Glucose Co., 13 Misc. 657; 69 St.
Rep. 155; 34 Supp. 931; 12 App. Div. 624; 76 St.
Rep. 1126; 42 Supp. 1126; 151 N. Y. 549; aff’d 154
N. Y. 474.
Fire in car burned up plaintiff’s personal effects.
McKay v. Buffalo Bill’s W. W. Co., 17 Misc. 396; 39
Supp. 1041; 17 Misc. 601; 40 Supp. 592.
HARNESS.
Laborer between cart and embankment. Hook on saddle
caught rein and catsed horse to back.
Kerrigan v. Hart, 40 Hun, 389.
300 MASTER AND SERVANT.
HARNESS.
Coachman wanted blinders; master refused; horses ran away.
Wooster v. Bliss, 90 Hun, 79; 70 St. Rep. 126; 35 Supp.
514.
HIT BY THINGS OUTSIDE OF TRAIN.
Bridges.
Smoke from engine prevented plaintiff from seeing low bridge.
Owen v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 1 Lans. 108; aff’d 47 N. Y.
670. .
Sitting on car; tunnel at least 4 feet 6 inches above car.
Hunter v. N. Y.,O. & W.R.R. Co., 5 St. Rep. 64; rev.
27 St. Rep. 729, and 116 N. Y. 615.
Four low bridges near together; no signals between them;
dark; hit by second bridge.
Ryan v. Long Island R. R: Co., 51 Hun, 607; 22 St.
Rep. 655; 4 Supp. 381; aff'd 124 N. Y. 654; applied
59 Hun, 229, and 36 St. Rep. 755, and 12 Supp. 932.
Foreign cars higher than defendant’s. No warnings for
bridge.
Pitcher v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 943;
127 N. Y. 678.
No tell-tales for low bridge.
Williams v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 39 Hun, 430; rev.
27 St. Rep. 760, and 116 N. Y. 628; applied 59 Hun,
229, and 36 St. Rep. 755, and 12 Supp. 932; applied
54 Hun, 629, and 28 St. Rep. 228, and 8 Supp. 107;
dist. 15 Daly, 27, and 16 St. Rep. 693, and 1 Supp.
273; explained 23 J. & S. 138, and 11 St. Rep. 725,
and 27 Week. Dig. 335; 92 Hun, 219; 71 St. Rep.
218; 36 Supp. 274.
Tell-taJe for low bridge was out of order.
Wallace v. Central Vermont R. R. Co., 63 Hun, 632;
43 St. Rep. 639; 18 Supp. 280; 52 St. Rep. 351; 138
N. Y. 302.
Car 18 inches higher than ordinary cars; brakeman hit by
beams of a bridge.
Lynch v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 44 St. Rep. 663;
18 Supp. 417.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 301
HIT BY THINGS OUTSIDE OF TRAIN.
Bridges.
Brakeman found on track at low bridge.
Fitzgerald v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 59 Hun, 225;
36 St. Rep. 755; 12 Supp. 932; 88 Hun, 359; 68 St.
Rep. 762; 34 Supp. 824; 154 N. Y. 263; criticised 44
St. Rep. 665, and 18 Supp. 417; dist. 61 Hun, 131,
and 39 St. Rep. 621, and 15 Supp. 657.
Passing trains.
Brakeman in caboose hit by cross piece or “ bolster” of pass-
ing train.
Knox v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 93; 52
St. Rep. 730; 23 Supp. 198.
Engineer struck by board projecting from freight car on other
track.
Ryan v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 269; 68
St. Rep. 260; 34 Supp. 665; 17 App. Div. 221; 79 St.
Rep. 542; 45 Supp. 512.
Hit by passing street car on curve.
Mulvaney v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 1 Misc. 425; 49
St. Rep. 637; 21 Supp. 427; aff’d 60 St. Rep. 869,
and 142 N. Y. 651.
Brakeman boarded moving train at switch; crushed by car on
other track near it.
McDugan v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 336;
63 St. Rep. 516; 31 Supp. 135.
Sued proprietor of side track.
Servant of R. R. killed on defendant’s side track.
Roach v. Fort Orange Paper Co., 18 Week. Dig. 124;
95 N. Y. 660; dist. 44 Hun, 310, and 7 St. Rep. 627,
and 12 Civ. Pro. 301.
Brakeman on car hit by low bridge which connected buildings.
of defendant.
Dukes v. Eastern Distilling Co., 51 Hun, 605; 22 St.
Rep. 833; 4 Supp 562; aff'd 123 N. Y. 652.
No tell-tale before cross bar of gate into yard.
McGovern v. Standard Oil Co., 11 App. Div. 588; 76:
St. Rep. 595; 42 Supp. 595.
302 MASTER AND SERVANT.
HIT BY THINGS OUTSIDE OF TRAIN.
Unclassified.
Struck by top of station.
Gibson v. Erie Ry. Co., 5 Hun, 31; rev. 63 N. Y. 449;
applied 36 St. Rep. 92,,and 12 Supp.*454; followed
116 N. Y. 634, and 27 St. Rep. 760; dist. 24 Hun, 48;
followed 88 N. Y. 264.
Hit by switch.
Evans v. L.S.& M.S. Ry. Co., 12 Hun, 289.
New car higher than ordinary; hit by overhead trestle.
Rock v. Retsoff Mining Co., 4o St. Rep. 556; 15 Supp.
872; followed 44 St. Rep. 666, and 18 Supp. 417.
Hit by mail crane.
Sisco v. Lehigh & H. R. Ry. Co., 75 Hun, 582; 59 St.
Rep. 162; 27 Supp. 671; rev. 64 St. Rep. 708, and
145 N. Y. 2096.
Wire over track caught plaintiff.
Richmond v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 8 App. Div.
382; 75 St. Rep. 196; 40 Supp. 812.
Conductor of street car jumped on moving car and hit by post
of storage depot.
Reiser v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co., 24 App Div. 23.
Fireman looking at hot journal on wrong side of locomotive;
head hit telegraph pole.
Benthin v. N. YC. & H. R. R. R. Co., 24 App. Div.
303.
MACHINERY.
Boilers, ovens, etc.
Servant of contractor to repair defendant’s boilers. Defendant
sent him over an apparently dead. fire.
McLaughlin v. Campbell, 14 Week. Dig. 194.
Asphygiated cleaning a naphtha tank.
Kelly v. Consumers’ Gas Co., 17 Week. Dig. 408.
In blast furnace cleaning it. Lever moved and hot blast
turned on.
Dana v. Crown Point Iron Co., 67 Hun, 586; 51 St. Rep.
238; 22 Supp. 455.
Went into oven ‘o clean it , it collapsed.
Guiliano v. Whitenack, 9 Misc. 8; 59 St. Rep. 738; 29
Supp. 20.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 303
MACHINERY.
Feet caught in machinery on floor.
Stepped on uncovered rollers; had declined masters’ offer to
cover.
Shaw v. Sheldon, 3 St. Rep. 679; 21 Week. Dig. 489;
1 Silv. 191; 25 Week. Dig. 45; 103 N. Y. 667; fol-
lowed 57 Hun, 258, and 32 St. Rep. 621, and 10 Supp.
774-
Infant caught foot in cylinder,
McCarragher v. Rogers, 8 St. Rep. 847; 31 St. Rep.
595; aff'd 120 N. Y. 526; dist. 134 N. Y. 558, and 48
St. Rep. 336.
Caught foot in machinery through grating in sugar house.
Cmielewski v. Mollenhauer S. R. Co., 11 App. Div.
111; 76 St. Rep. 936; 42 Supp. 936.
Gears and cog-wheels — adults.
Caught in cog wheels.
Wendling v. Bainbridge, 6 St. Rep. 21; 25 Week. Dig.
481.
Siezed cog wheel ; no brake.
White v. Sharp, 27 Hun, 94; 97 N. Y. 640.
Press feeder slipped on oily floor against cog wheels of print-
ing press.
Clark v. Barnes, 37 Hun, 389; 76 N. Y. 301; applied
4 St. Rep. 783, and 25 Week. Dig. 782.
Unguarded cog of winch on vessel.
Eldridge v. Atlas S. S. Co., 55 Hun, 309; 28 St. Rep.
501; 8 Supp. 433; followed 58 Hun, 98; 33 St. Rep.
1016; 11 Supp. 468; 58 Hun, 96; 33 St. Rep. 1016;
11 Supp. 468; aff'd 48 St. Rep. 257, and 134 N. Y. 187.
Cleaning cog wheels on punch; waste caught and hand drawn
in,
Knisley v. Pratt, 75 Hun, 323; rev. 148 N. Y. 372.
Key which locked cog wheel dropped out; caught his arm
while inserting it. 7
McCue v. National Starch Mfg. Co., 50 St. Rep. 871;
21 Supp. 551; rev. 58 St. Rep. 447, and 142 N. Y. 106.
Caught in passing unguarded cog wheels.
Simpson v. N. Y. Rubber Co., 80 Hun, 415.
304 MASTER AND SERVANT.
MACHINERY.
Gears and cog-wheels — adults.
Cleaning machine; hand caught :n cog wheels.
Graves v. Brewer, 4 App. Div. 327; 74 St. Rep. 186; 38
Supp. 566. °
Hand in cog wheels of hoisting engine.
Guilladen v. Coast Wrecking Co., 18 Week. Dig. 303;
followed 48 Hun, 593, and 16 St. Rep. 28, and 1 Supp.
232.
Cogs on corrugating machine guarded in front. Went to rear
to oil.
Ekendahl v. Hayes, 10 App. Div. 487; 76 St. Rep. 226;
42 Supp. 226.
Gears and cog wheels — infants.
Coat of infant caught in cog wheels.
Miller v. Coykendall, 20 Week. Dig. 299.
Boy of 1§ caught hand in oiling.
Finnerty v. Prentice, 19 Alb. L. J. 160; 75 N. Y. 615.
Boy of 12 trying to put shell in machine caught hand in cog
wheels.
Buckley v. Gutta Percha & R. M. Co., 41 Hun, 450;
rev. 23 St. Rep. 618, and 113 N. Y. 440; 3 Civ. Pro.
429; aff'd 93 N. Y. 637; applied 44 St. Rep. 884, and
18 Supp. 130.
Boy of 13, in starting machinery with lever, put other hand in
cog wheels.
White v. Witteman Lith. Co., 58 Hun, 381; 34 St. Rep.
895; 12 Supp. 188; aff'd 43 St. Rep. 312, and 131
N. Y. 631. :
Boy of 16 in rope walk tripped on track and fell with hand in
cog wheels.
Spaulding v. Tucker & C. C. Co., 13 Misc. 398; 68 St.
Rep. 117; 34 Supp. 237; aff'd 153 N. Y. 660.
Hand caught in cog wheel.
Reardon v. Consolidated Card Co., 5 Month. L. Bul.
92; 18 J. & S. 514; 19 J. & S. 134; appeal dismissed.
105 N. Y. 648.
MASTER AND SERVAT). 305
MACHINERY.
Hands and fingers caught in punches, dies, ete. — adults.
Hand in steam hammer.
Murphy v. Farrar, 24 Week. Dig. 78.
Finger off hand from personal negliegnce of master.
McMahon v. Walsh, 11 J. & S. 36; aff'd 74 N. Y. 602.
Arm caught in press.
Jordan v. Bowen, 14 J. & S. 355.
Finger under tin stamping die.
Haug v. Rissner, 4 St. Rep. 644.
Hand caught in tin stamping machine.
Hillis v. Hine, 11 St. Rep. 656.
Finger caught in hemp which caught on the axle of a machine.
Erhalt v. Marshall, 14 St. Rep. 552.
Hand in planing machine.
Goldman v. Mason, 18 St. Rep. 376; 2 Supp. 337.
Hand caught in rollers.
Gordon v. Reynolds Card Mfg. Co., 47 Hun, 278; 14
St. Rep. 394; 28 Week. Dig. 238.
Hand in cylinder of threshing machine.
Sneider v. Treichler, 56 Hun, 309; 30 St. Rep. 959; 9
Supp. 584.
Hand in stamping machine.
Fuchs v. Sweeney Mfg. Co., 34 St. Rep. 925; 12 Supp.
870.
Hand caught in unguarded leather splitting machine.
Plunkett v. Donovan, 36 St. Rep. 91; 12 Supp. 454;
followed 39 St. Rep. 124, and 14 Supp. 932.
Hand under hammer of tin stamping machine.
Benedict v. Scheider, 38 St. Rep. 201; 14 Supp. 888.
Hand caught in jointer.
W. L. Bond v. Smith, 39 St. Rep. 124; 14 Supp. 932.
Fingers caught in tin stamping press.
Van Sickel v. Ilsley, 75 Hun, 537; 58 St. Rep. 731; 27
Supp. 1113; aff'd 149 N. Y. 569.
Hand in mangle.
Hughes v. County of Monroe, 79 Hun, 120; 69 St. Rep.
306; 147 N. Y. 49.
Hand in press; foot slipped from lever and press started sud-
denly.
Sweeney v. Berlin & J. Envelope Co., 101 N. Y. 520;
[20]
06 MASTER AND SERVANT.
MACHINERY.
lands and fingers caught in punches, dies, etc. — adults.
applied 4 St. Rep. 783, and 25 Week. Dig. 268; dist.
39 St. Rep. 720, and 15 Supp. 598.
Hand in sausage machine.’ a
Schulz v. Rohe, 4 Misc. 384; 53 St. Rep. 576; 24 Supp. .
118; 8 Misc. 683; 59 St. Rep. 892; 28 Supp. 1148; rev.
149 N. Y. 132.
Hand caught under die of hydraulic draw bench.
Borgeson v. U. S. Projectile Co., 2 App. Div. 57; 72
St. Rep. 548; 37 Supp. 458.
Hand caught in ram.
Dumes v. Sizer, 3 App. Div. 11; 73 St. Rep. 548; 37
Supp. 929.
Hand caught in rolls of mangle.
Walsh v. Commercial S. Laundry Co., 11 Misc. 3; 63
St. Rep. 461; 31 Supp. 833.
Fingers in die of stamping machine.
Strauss v. Haberman Mfg. Co., 23 App. Div. 1.
‘ands and fingers caught in punches, dies, etc. — infants.
Boy of 12 caught hand in rollers.
Murphy v. Mairs, 19 Week. Dig. 492; 25 Week. Dig.
309; 6 St.Rep. 42; reviewed 12 St. Rep. gz.
Boy of 12 caught arm in mortising machine.
Siegel v. Schantz, 2 T. & C. 353.
Finger in steam punching machine; brake slipped.
Cooke v. Lalance & G. Mfg. Co., 29 Hun, 641; 33 Hun,
351; 1 St. Rep. 590.
Hand caught while feeding press.
Baird v. Richardson, 4 St. Rep. 648.
Girl of 13 in vegetable canning factory caught hand in knives of
tin @ap cutting machine.
Flynn v. Erie Preserving Co., 12 St. Rep. 88.
Finger under die.
Cullen v. National S. M. R. Co., 46 Hun, 562; 12 St.
Rep. 534; 28 Week. Dig. 118; 14 St. Rep. 534; rev.
22 St. Rep. 298, and 114 N. Y. 45.
Boy of 15 cleaning under cards, caught hand in carding cyl-
inder, which started suddenly.
Dingley v. Star Knitting Co., 34 St. Rep. 989; 12 Supp.
31; aff'd 48 St. Rep. 336, and 134 N. Y. 552.
-
MASTER AND SERVANT. 307
MACHINERY.
Hands and fingers caught in punches, dies, etc. — infants.
Hand in roller.
Coffey v. Chapal, 19 St. Rep. 61; 2 Supp. 648.
Girl of 14 caught her hand in fluted jute roller.
Healy v. Hart Bagging Co., 39 St. ne 122; 14 Supp.
934-
Finger in punch.
Hayes v. Bush & Denslow Mfg. Co., 41 Hun, 407; 3 St.
Rep. 136; 25 Week. Dig. 42; 102 N. Y. 648.
Hand in feeding rollers to iron.
Hickey v. Taafe, 32 Hun, 7; 6 St. Rep. sie 99 N. Y.
204; 105 N. Y. 26.
Boy of 18 caught hand in knives of planing machine.
Rikel v. Ferguson, 25 St. Rep. 960; 5 Supp. 774; aff’d
117 N. Y. 658.
Arm in knives of planing machine.
Crown vy. Orr, 71 Hun, 618; 54 St. Rep. 308; 24 Supp.
620; rev. 55 St. Rep. 834, and 140 N. Y. 450.
Hand in rollers.
Owens v. Ernst, 1 Misc. 388; 49 St. Rep. 640; 21 Supp.
426; aff'd 60 St. Rep. 869, and 142 N. Y. 661.
Hand in press..
Fox v. Le Comte, 2 App. Div. 61; 72 St. Rep. 502; 37
Supp. 316.
Hand in punch.
Irvine v. Palmer Mfg. Co., 2 App. Div. 69; 72 St. Rep.
508; 37 Supp. 322; 3 App. Div. 385; 39 Supp. 245.
Hand in press.
Kaplan v. N. Y. Biscuit Co., 5 App. Div. 60; 38 Supp.
1049; 151 N. Y. 171.
Hand in corn cutter.
Sciolina v. Erie Preserving Co., 7 App. Div. 417; 39
Supp. 916; 3 Ann. Cas. 237; 151 N. Y. 50.
Hand in die.
Koehler v. Syracuse S. Co., 12 App. Div. 50; 76 St. Rep.
182; 42 Supp. 182.
Hand in mangle.
Fitzhenry v. Lamson, 19 App. Div. 543'79 St. Rep. 875;
45 Supp. 875.
308 MASTER AND SERVANT.
MACHINERY.
Hands and fingers caught in punches, dies, etc. — infants,
Hand in die.
Prescott v. Ottman Lith. Co., 20 App. Div. 397.
Girl of 15; hand. in ironer.
Coffee v. Phillips, 21 Misc. 663.
Girl of 17; hand in mangle.
O’Hare v. Keeler, 22 App. Div. 191.
Saws — adults.
Dull circular saw.
Webber v. Piper, 38 Hun, 353; aff'd 16 St. Rep. 423,
and 109 N. Y. 496; dist. 31 St. Rep. 801, and 9 Supp.
881; followed 126 N. Y. 572, and 38 St. Rep. 428.
Foundation loose and circular saw jerked; caught hand.
Piggott v. Hanchett, 30 St. i 379; 8 Supp. 731; aff'd
130 N. Y. 689.
Saw suddenly started.
Odell v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 6 St. Rep. 99; rev.
31 St. Rep. 27, and 120 N. Y. 323.
Rope to weight to pull back circular saw broke; arm caught.
French v. Aulls, 72 Hun, 442.
Circular saw dull; no instructions.
Vilas v. Vanderbilt, 20 Misc. 51.
Working at washing beer kegs; put on saw; fingers off.
Gaertner v. Schmitt & S., 21 App. Div. 403.
Saws — infants.
Boy of 16; no instructions; had to stand on tiptoe. Saw struck
worm in wood and caught his hand.
Qgley v. Miles, 28 St. Rep. 893 ; 8 Supp. 270; 139 N.Y.
458.
Boy of 18; arm caught in reaching over circular saw to operate
shifter.
Schlierman v. Hammond T. Co., 11 Misc. 546; 64 St.
Rep. 445; 32 Supp. 748.
Boy of 14. Accidentally put thumb on circular saw.
McCann v. Mathison, 12 Misc. 214; 66 St. Rep. 855; 33
Supp. 263.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 309
MACHINERY.
Saws — infants.
Boy of 15; board stuck and finger caught.
Ferguson v. Smith, 15 Misc. 251; 71 St. Rep. 465; 36
Supp. 415; applied 119 N. Y. 135, and 28 St. Rep.
255.
Shafting and belts.
Boy of 13 feeding wood chopper injured in adjusting belt.
Beatty v. Hessman, 2 City Ct. 10.
Belt on shafting slipped.
Conboy v. Donaldson, Daily Reg. 26 January, 1884.
Caught by belt when on ladder.
Cahill v. Hilton, 21 Week. Dig. 541; rev. 11 St. ree
26, and 27 Week. Dig. 235, and 106 N. Y. 512; ap-
plied 15 Daly, 211, and 23 St. Rep. 630, and 4 Supp.
705; applied 34 St. Rep. 991, and 12 Supp. 31; dist.
15 Daly, 289, and 25 St. Rep. 749, and 6 Supp. 517;
dist. 14 St. Rep. 653; 31 St. Rep. 114; aff'd 96 N. Y.
675.
Caught in set screw of shaft.
Van Horn v. B., H. T. & W. R. R. Co., 4 St. Rep. 782;
25 Week. Dig. 268; aff'd 113 N. Y. 634.
Belt of machine parted and end hit plaintiff.
Harley v. Buffalo Car Mig. Co., 38 St. Rep. 574; 15
Supp. 37; 48 St. Rep. 58; 20 Supp. 354; rev. 58 St.
Rep. 437, and 142 N. Y. 31.
Caught arm on shaft while wiping it with bagging.
Smith v. Martin, 39 St. Rep. 126; 14 Supp. 935.
Boy of 18; caught in belt; no fast and loose pulley.
Jacobson v. Cornelius, 52 Hun, 377; 24 St. Rep. 360;
5 Supp. 306.
Caught hair in unguarded shafting.
Cobb v. Welcher, 75 Hun, 283; 58 St. Rep. 200; 26
Supp. 1068.
Boy of 19; rotten belt broke; working on planer and killed.
Headifen v. Cooper, 6 Misc. 263; 58 St. Rep. 130; 26
Supp. 763.
Arm entangled in belt while repairing it.
Rozelle v. Rose, 3 App. Div. 132; 39 Supp. 363.
310 MASTER AND SERVANT.
MACHINERY.
Shafting and belts.
Kalsomining walk; clothes caught in set screw of shaft.
Glassheim v. N. Y. Economical P. Co., 13 Misc. 174;
68 St. Rep. 24; 34 Supp. 69.
Infant caught on rag on shaft while mending belt.
Dodd v. Bell, 15 App. Div. 258; 78 St. Rep. 198; 44
Supp. 198; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 37.
Man caught in belt; deceased tried to pull him out and was
caught himself.
Sann v. Johns Mfg. Co., 16 App. Div. 252; 2 Am. Neg.
Rep. 432.
Started suddenly.
Lifting fly wheel; engine started suddenly.
Crispin v. Babbitt, 81 N. Y. 516; dist. 51 Hun, 463, and
21 St. Rep. 487, and 3 Supp. 882; dist. 52 Hun, 12,
and 22 St. Rep. 221, and 4 Supp. 704; dist. 63 Hun,
591, and 45 St. Rep. 711, and 18 Supp. 609; dist. 6 St.
Rep. 596, and 25 Week. Dig. 398; dist. 43 St. Rep.
220, and 16 Supp. 840; followed 126 N. Y. 6, and 36
St. Rep. 359; followed 14 Daly, 52, and 3 St. Rep.
604; followed 84 N. Y. 81; dist. 85 N. Y. 61; followed
29 Hun, 556; applied 84 N. Y. 77; applied 73 N. Y.
38; applied 80 N. Y. 46.
Deceased in clay mill, which started suddenly; bolt of loose
pulley broke.
Frank v. Otis, 2 St. Rep. 679; 15 St. Rep. 681; aff’d 113
N. Y. 654.
Deceased working in vat for mixing pulp; arms suddenly
started.
Wilson v. Hudson River W. P. & P. Co., 71 Hun, 292;
* 54 St. Rep. 484; 24 Supp. 1072.
Plaintiff at work in cable trench; cable suddenly started.
Floettl v. Johnson Engineering Co., 10 App. Div. 308;
75 St. Rep. 1191: 41 Supp. 792; 19 App. Div. 136;
79 St. Rep. 980; 45 Supp. 980.
Greasing sheath wheel in slot; foreman promised to warn, but
did not.
Mullane v. Houston, W. S. & P. F. R. R. Co., 20 Mise.
434; 79 St. Rep. 1039; 45 Supp. 1039; 21 Misc. 10.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 311
MACHINERY.
Unclassified.
Infant cleaning machinery while in motion.
Foy v. Buchanan, 4 St. Rep. 894; 25 Week. Dig. 368;
reviewed 12 St. Rep. 93.
Infant ; patent danger, but no instructions.
Thall v. Carnie, 24 St. Rep. 270; 5 Supp. 244; 1 Silv.
S. C. 4o1.
Infant came in contact with machinery. ’
Oszkoscil v. Eagle Pencil Co., 25 St. Rep. 925; 6 Supp.
501; 25 J.& S. 217; aff'd 119 N. Y. 631.
Infant tried to clean machinery in motion.
De Young v. Irving. 5 App. Div. 499; 38 Supp. 1089.
PARTING OF TRAIN.
Pin broke in train and cars rolled back against car being re-
paired.
Besel v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 9 Hun, 457; rev.
70 N. Y. 171; dist. 43 St. Rep. 220, and 16 Supp. 840;
followed 13 Daly, 92; applied 8 Abb. N. C. 41; ap-
plied 59 How. Pr. 197; dist. 21 Hun, 500.
Locomotive and tender parted and fireman fell through.
Dudley v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 20 Week. Dig.
118; 99 N. Y. 606.
Locomotive and tender parted; no safety chains. Locomotive
ran away into another locomotive and killed brakeman
thereon.
Morse v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 39 Hun, 414.
Brakeman repairing defects on stationary part; first part
backed into it.
Course v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 17 St. Rep.
715; 2 Supp. 312; aff'd 117 N. Y. 652.
Link between tender and car broke; brakeman injured.
Sweeney v. N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep.
416; 10 Supp. 305; 26 J. & S. 223.
Locomotive and tender parted and fireman fell through.
Powers v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 60 Hun, 19; 38
St. Rep. 558; 14 Supp. 408; aff’d 128 N. Y. 659.
12 MASTER AND SERVANT.
PARTING OF TRAIN.
Plaintiff on coal cars on trestle; locomotive pushing other cars
stopped, draw bar of locomotive broke, and cars knocked
off end of trestle.
Grant v. Pennsylvania & N. Y. C. & R. R. Co., 45 St.
Rep. 305; 133 N. Y. 657; dist. 73 Hun, 128, and 56
St. Rep. 63, and 25 Supp. 957.
RUN OVERS.
irecting trains on other track.
Directing the coupling of cars; standing on next track and run
over.
Haskin v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 65 Barb. 129;
aff'd 56 N. Y. 608.
Ran over brakeman in charge of stone cars on side track; he
stood on main track.
Clark v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 320;
61 St. Rep. 840; 30 Supp. 126.
Conductor of switching train stepped on other track without
looking and run over.
Redmond v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 31 St. Rep. 366;
10 Supp. 330.
Talking on track.
Crossing track.
Craig v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 13 Daly, 214; 103 N. Y.
669.
Run over in crossing track.
Kennedy v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 33 Hun, 457; dist. 31
St. Rep. 799, and 9 Supp. 881.
On track going to work.
Mele v. D. & H. C. Co., 27 J. & S. 367; 39 St. Rep.
153; 14 Supp. 630.
rorking near track.
Chain tender run over by car derailed from faulty switch.
Sammon v. N. Y. & H. R. R. R. Co., 6 J. & S. 414;
aff'd 62 N. Y. 251, and 49 How. Pr. 348; dist. 15
Hun, 172.
MASTER AND SERVANT. e153
RUN OVERS.
Working near track.
Mending rail at side of inclined railway.
Jenkins vy. Mahopac Iron Ore Co., 32 St. Rep. 866; 10
Supp. 484; aff'd 132 N. Y. 595.
Flagman on duty run over; headlight out.
McDonald v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 63 Hun,
587; 45 St. Rep. 711; 18 Supp. 609; aff’d 53 St. Rep.
932, and 138 N. Y. 663.
Switchman run over.
Dering v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 50 St. Rep.
832; 22 Supp. 344.
Gateman hit by locomotive.
Flanagan v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 83 Hun,
522; 65 St. Rep. 121; 32 Supp. &4.
Flagman hit by locomotive.
O’Loughlin v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 87 Hun,
538; 9 St. Rep. 384; 34 Supp. 297; 25 Week. Dig.
109; 22 St. Rep. 992; aff'd 113 N. Y. 623.
Working on track; crushed between cars and L. post.
Sullivan v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 19 App. Div. 195;
79 St. Rep. 1083; 45 Supp. 1083.
Working on track.
Laborer on new track run over by train switched over it;
main line obstructed.
Boldt v. N. Y. C. R. R. R. Co., 18 N. Y. 432; followed
27 J. & S. 375, and 39 St. Rep. 153, and 14 Supp.
630.
Run over while working on track.
Ominger v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 4 Hun, 159;
6 T. & C. 4098; dist. 62 Hun, 591, ard 42 St. Rep.
580, and 17 Supp. 302.
Track repairer run over by second part of train making fly-
ing switch.
Haley v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 7 Hun, 84.
Trackman run over by wild-cat light locomotive; snowing.
McEvoy v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 12 St. Rep. 73.
Laborer on track injured.
Harrington v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 19 St. Rep.
20; 4 Supp. 640.
314 MASTER AND SERVANT.
RUN OVERS.
Working on track.
Trackman at work hit by timber sticking out of freight car.
Dougherty v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 45 St. Rep. 154;
18 Supp. 841; aff’d 53 St. Rep. 929, and 138 N. Y.
641. res
Caught foot in guard rail while working on track and run
over.
Haas v. Buffalo & P. R. R. Co., 40 Hun, 145.
Removing ashes from pit.
Sullivan v. Tioga R. R. Co., 44 Hun, 304; 7 St. Rep.
627; 12 Civ. Pro. Rep. 301; aff'd 21 St. Rep. 827,
and 112 N. Y. 643; followed 118 N. Y. 574, and 29
St. Rep. 855.
Removing ashes from pit.
Ellis v. Houston, 22 St. Rep. 194; 4 Supp. 732; aff'd
117 N. Y. 642.
Locomotive backed over employee shoveling snow at cross-
ing.
Wall v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 54 Hun, 454; 28 St.
Rep. 132; 7 Supp. 709; aff’d 35 St. Rep. 995, and
125 N. Y. 727.
Cleaning under car which suddenly started.
Morgan v. Hudson River O. & I. Co., 39 St. Rep.
694; 15 Supp. 609; rev. 45 St. Rep. 112, and 133 N.
Y. 666.
Track repairer run over by switched car moving slowly.
Crowe v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 70 Hun, 37; 53.
St. Rep. 558; 23 Supp. 1100.
Shoveler in ash pit run over.
Reichel v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 29 St. Rep.
843; 9 Supp. 414: 18 Civ. Pro. 248; 42 St. Rep. 510;
* 3 Silv. 662; 130 N. Y. 682.
Track laborer stepped from one track to escape approaching
train to other track in front of train.
Tomko v. Central R. R. Co. of N. J., 1 App. Div. 289;
72 St. Rep. 651; 37 Supp. 144.
Run over in dark tunnel; trains each way.
Felice v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 14 App. Div.
345377 St. Rep. 922; 43 Supp. 922; 1 Am. Neg. Rep.
637. !
MASTER AND SERVANT. 315,
RUN OVERS.
Unclassified.
Car in mine shaft broke away and ran over plaintiff.
Burke v. Witherbee, 18 Week. Dig. 369; 98 N. Y. 5623.
dist. 6 St. Rep. 25, and 25 Week. Dig. 21; dist. 17
St. Rep. 395, and 2 Supp. 1; dist. 25 Week. Dig. 24;
followed 106 N. Y. 141, and 8 St. Rep. 596, and 27
Week. Dig. 94; followed 57 Hun, 381, and 32 St.
Rep. 962, and 10 Supp. 833.
Run over while trying to remove hand car.
Roll v. Northern Central Ry. Co., 15 Hun, 496; aff'd
80 N. Y. 647.
Cable broke; tram car ran over plaintiff.
Rima v. Rossie Iron Works, 47 Hun, 153; 14 St. Rep.
651; aff'd 31 St. Rep. 590, and 120 N. Y. 433..
Unloading coal; tried to push car; next car moved and ran
over leg.
Kudik v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 492; 61
St. Rep. 210; 29 Supp. 533.
Mule driver stepped on bumper which turned; run over.
Voshefskey v. Hillside Coal & I. Co., 21 App. Div..
168.
SKIDS.
Removing machinery from vessel. Old ship’s bridge broken
by sliding bucket down it. Spliced and used. Broke with
deceased on it; he fell and was drowned.
Jones v. Roach, 9 J. & S. 248.
Loading vessel. Dock end of skid not tied. It fell and threw
plaintiff into water.
Hudson v. Ocean S. S. Co., 38 Hun, 644; 16 St. Rep.
416; 2 Silv. 75; 110 N. Y. 625.
Mouthpiece of skid not fastened properly. A five-inch space
jarred drums off truck on plaintiff's legs.
~ McCampbell v. Cunard S. S. Co., 36 St. Rep. 825; 13.
Supp. 288; 69 Hun, 131; 53 St. Rep. 330; 23 Supp.
477; 76 Hun, 609; 58 St. Rep. 870; 27 Supp. 11123.
rev. 64 St. Rep. 246, and 144 N. Y. 552.
Plank walk between freight floats. Float not properly fast-
316 MASTER AND SERVANT.
“SKIDS.
ened; plank gave way at one end and truck and cask which
plaintiff was transferring fell on his leg.
Conway v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 11 Misc. 641;
66 St. Rep. 347; 32 Supp. 921; rev. 13 Misc. 53, and
68 St. Rep. 97, and 34 Supp. 113.
Longshoreman working with stevedore loading vessel. Skid
fell; no lanyards.
Divver v. Hall, 20 Misc. 677; 21 Misc. 452.
TWO RAILROADS.
Engineer of N. Y. & N. H. running on defendant’s tracks;
switch improperly turned; signal.
Smith v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 6 Duer, 225; aff'd 19
N. Y. 127; dist. 43 Hun, 30, and 6 St. Rep. 572, and
25 Week. Dig. 415; followed 44 Hun, 247, and 10
St. Rep. 456, and 26 Week. Dig. 494; followed 44
‘Hun, 310, and 7 St. Rep. 627, and 12 Civ. Pro. 301;
followed 50 Hun, 223, and 19 St. Rep. 772, and 2
Supp. 780.
Servant of Palace Car Co. cleaning cars; car switched against
car.
Harold v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 13 Daly, 89; 13
Daly, 378.
Crossing; engineer of A. & S
Wood v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 70 N. Y. 195.
Car of one road in switching got on track of other road. En-
gineer of approaching train jumped.
Albert v. Sweet, 3 St. Rep. 738; 25 Week. Dig. 96;
aff'd 26 St. Rep. 738, and 116 N. Y. 363.
Servant of Erie Ry. in joint yards run over. Went to next
track to reach his own train.
Green v. D. & H. C. Co., 38 Hun, 51; 4 St. Rep. 241.
Brakeman of N. Y. & O. M. on that road which carried
D. & H. cars on mileage. Brake wheel hole too large and
rod only 2 in. Rod broke and brakeman thrown under cars.
Wright v. D. & H. C. Co., 40 Hun, 343.
R. W. & O. train on defendant’s track subject to defendant's
rules. It was sent extra and collided with defendant’s
shifter. Crew of shifter not advised of extra and jumped.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 317
TWO RAILROADS.
Collision sent shifter forward to R., W. & O. tracks where
it collided with R., W. & O. shifter on which plaintiff was
fireman.
Nary v. N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 29 St. Rep. 630; 9
Supp. 153; aff'd 125 N. Y. 759.
B. & A. servant run over while working on B. & A. track in
yard.
Noonan y. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 42 St. Rep. 41;
16 Supp. 678; aff'd 131 N. Y. 594.
Engineer of one road run into by engine of another road ob-
taining water. Defendant’s engineer failed to flag.
Gross v. Pennsylvania, P. & B. R. R. Co., 42 St. Rep.
808; 16 Supp. 616; 65 Hun, 191; 47 St. Rep. 374;
20 Supp. 28.
Servant of contractor of D. & H. in shoveling coal on one of
defendant’s cars on D. & H. trestle run into by another of
defendant’s cars shunted into his car; defective brake.
Kowalewska v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 72 Hun,
611; 55 St. Rep. 167; 25 Supp. 184.
Brakeman of Erie R. R. hit by low bridge; no tell tales.
Neff v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 394; 62 St.
Rep. 50; 30 Supp. 323.
One of crew of D., L. & W.; collision with S., B. & N. Y. train.
Tierney v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 85 Hun,
146; 66 St. Rep. 85; 32 Supp. 627.
Engineer of P., P. & B. running on Erie derailed; switch.
Strader v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 86 Hun, 613;
67 St. Rep. 434; 33 Supp. 761.
Sealer of G. T. Ry. at work hit by switch engine.
Goodall v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 89 Hun, 559;
70 St. Rep. 112; 35 Supp. 544.
VESSELS.
Medical attendance.
Mate injured; captain refused to let him go to hospital. He
sued captain and other owners.
Scarff v. Metcalf, 26 Hun, 202; aff'd 27 Week. Dig.
312, and 11 St. Rep. 396, and 107 N. Y. ait.
318 MASTER AND SERVANT.
VESSELS.
Sailor was injured; captain denied him services of doctor at
port; he sued owner of -vessel.
Petersen v. Swan, 3c St. Rep. 208; 18 J. & S. 46; 119
N. Y. 662; 21 J. & Ss151 124 N. Y. 665.
Obeyed dangerous order.
Leg entangled in hawser ; plaintiff protested but mate insisted.
Olson v. Clyde, 32 Hun, 425.
Obeyed command though he knew it was dangerous.
Anderson v. N. Y. & Cuba Mail S. S. Co., 17 Misc. 93;
39 Supp. 425; rev. 13 App. Div. 218, and 77 St. Rep.
213, and 43 Supp. 213.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Master sued servant.
Freight stolen from vessel while crew away. Action for
wages; counterclaim that crew should stand the loss.
Lewis v. Davis, 3 Johns. 17; 8 Daly, 185.
Hired to drive horses; injured them.
Newton v. Pope, 1 Cow. 109; qualified 1 Abb. N. C.
360; qualified 8 Daly, 212; qualified 45 N. Y. 553;
examined 4 J. & S. 30.
Cashier sold bonds too low.
Commercial Bank v. Ten Eyck, 50 Barb. 9; aff’d 48 N.
Y. 305.
Bank cashier failed to consult discount committee.
Second Nat. Bank of Oswego v. Burt, 93 N. Y. 233.
Servant careless with safe; moriey lost..
Whisten v. Brengal, 16 Misc. 37; 73 St. Rep. 400; 37
Supp. 813.
Miscellaneous.
Went to privy 125 feet from factory. Plaintiff’s lantern went
out and he walked off bank of creek.
Kesley v. Sanderson Bros. Steel Co., 20 Week. Dig.
192.
Alighting from paymaster’s car while in motion; ordered to
jump.
Hallett v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 22 Week.
Dig. 468.
MASTER AND SERVANT. 319
UNCLASSIFIED.
Miscellaneous.
Shoveling into wagon; run over by it.
Kunz v. Stuart, 1 Daly, 431.
Unloading dirt cars; while boarding, the locomotive started
suddenly with plaintiff between cars.
Henry v. Staten Island Ry. Co., 81 N. Y. 373.
Seaman assaulted by captain of vessel sued owners.
Gabrielson v. Waydell, 40 St. Rep. 991; rev. 47 St.
Rep. 848; which aff’d 36 St. Rep. 674, and 14 Supp.
125; 135 N. Y. 1.
Steel key on bridge had not been pulled back when other
boat left.
Hart v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 51 St. Rep. 291; 22
Supp. 3; 76 Hun, 296; 59 St. Rep. 110; 27 Supp.
767. .
Caught small-pox while whitewashing.
Span v. Ely, 8 Hun, 255; dist. 13 Week. Dig. 288.
Whitewash in eyes from force pump.
Kelley v. Forty-second St. R. R. Co., 58 Hun, 93; 33
St. Rep. 816; 11 Supp. 344.
Putting on flush boards.
Palmer v. Conant, 58 Hun, 333; 34 St. Rep. 816; 11
Supp. 917; aff'd 128 N. Y. 577.
Fireman injured in shaking defective locomotive grate.
Fancher v. N. Y., L. E.& W. R. R. Co., 75 Hun, 350;
56 St. Rep. 745: 27 Supp. 62.
Steward overboard.
Geoghegan v, Atlas S. S. Co., 16 Daly, 229; 32 St.
Rep. 49; 10 Supp. 121; 3 Misc. 224; 51 St. Rep. 868;
22 Supp. 749; aff'd 146 N. Y. 369; 6 Misc. 127; 56
St. Rep. 343; 25 Supp. 1116.
Unloading vessel to lighter; no fender; heel caught between
vessels.
Flynn v. Maine S. S. Co., 14 Misc. 446; 70 St. Rep.
7353 35 Supp. 103.
Lamp trimmer killed by arc light.
Harroun v. Brush El. L. Co., 12 App. Div. 126; 76 St.
Rep. 716; 42 Supp. 716; 14 App. Div. 19; 77 St.
Rep. 1155; 43 Supp. 1155; 152 N. Y. 212; 1 Am. Neg.
Rep. 484.
320 MASTER AND SERVANT.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Miscellaneous.
Infant directed to thrust hand into waste pipe; burned by
potash.
Dunn v. Connell, 20 Misc. 727; 21 Misc. 295.
Jockey injured in riding race horse.
Ray v. Keene, 19 App. Div. 147; 79 St. Rep. 896; 45
Supp. 896. ,
Switchman; push pole broke.
Miller v. Erie R. R. Co., 21 App. Div. 45.
Vo facts given.
Incompetent foreman.
Hansen v. Trustees of N. Y. & B. Bridge, 9 St. Rep.
726; 27 Week. Dig. 186.
Good captain and good boat.
Owens v. Steam Derrick Co., 5 Alb. L. J. 335.
Defective pleading.
Anderson v. N. J. S. B. Co., 7 Rob. 611.
Death in foreign state.
Debevoise v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 98 N. Y.
377; followed 7 Supp. 920, and 17 Civ. Pro. 438.
Carelessness of foreman.
Neubauer v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., tor N.Y.
607 ; dist. 43 St. Rep. 220, and 16 Supp. 840,
Question of release.
Purdy v. R.. W. & O. R. R. Co., 52 Hun, 267; 23 St.
Rep. 469; 5 Supp. 217; aff'd 34 St. Rep. 737, and 125
N. Y. 209.
Dangerous place.
Rook v. N. J. & P. Concentrating Works, 76 Hun, 54;
* 59 St. Rep. 610; 27 Supp. 623; aff'd 148 N. Y. 758.
Killed in foreign state.
Stone v. Croton Bridge Co., 77 Hun, go.
No lamps; question of rules.
Drake v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 490; 62
St. Rep. 592; 30 Supp. 671.
Brakeman killed.
Lowman v. E., C. & N. R. R. Co., 85 Hun, 188; 65
St. Rep. 723; 32 N. Y. 579; 154 N. Y. mem. 35.
4
MASTER AND SERVANT. 321
UNCLASSIFIED.
No facts given.
Fireman killed.
Borden v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 43 St. Rep. 935; 131
N. Y. 671.
Question of release.
Cleary v. Municipal Gaslight Co., 47 St. Rep. 172; 19
Supp. 951; aff'd 54 St. Rep. 932, and 139 N. Y. 643.
Question of ‘jurisdiction.
Phelps v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 17 App. Div.
392; 79 St. Rep. 178; 45 Supp. 178; 3 Am. Neg. Rep.
248.
MESSENGER COMPANIES.
Left some clothes and returned part.
. Feiber v. Manhattan D. T. Co., 15 Daly, 62; 20 St.
Rep. 95; 22 Abb. N. C. 121; 3 Supp. 116; 23 St. Rep.
67; 4 Supp. 555.
Loss.
Sanford v. American D. T. Co., 6 Misc. 534; 58 St.
Rep. 16; 27 Supp. 142; 31 Abb. N. C. 147; reversed
13 Misc. 88, and 68 St. Rep. 191, and 34 Supp. 144.
MISCELLANEOUS.
NO FACTS GIVEN.
Release.
Matthews v. Chiccpee Mfg. Co., 3 Robt. 711; ex-
plained 25 Hun; 543.
Complaint dismissed.
Desmond v. Rose, 14 J. & S. 569.
Appeal from order.
Bartlett v. McNeil, 49 How. Pr. 55; 3 Hun, 221; 5 T.
& C. 675; aff'd 60 N. Y. 53.
[21]
MISCELLANEOUS.
NO FACTS GIVEN.
Practice.
Silberstein v. Wicke Co., 29 Abb. N. C. 291; 22 Supp.
170.
Practice.
Shaw v. Rensselaer, 60 How. Pr. 143.
Negligence.
Morton v. Thurber, 85 N. Y. 550.
Services of wife.
Schuhle v. Cunningham, 22 J. & S. 302; 8 St. Rep. 96;
dist. 46 St. Rep. 909, and 19 Supp. 702; 14 Daly,
404; 13 St. Rep. 81.
Limitation.
Carpenter v. Shimer, 24 Hun, 464; followed 25 Hun,
36.
Release.
Mitchell v. Allen & Porter, 25 Hun, 543.
Prima facie face. i
Weckmann v. Am Ende, 25 St. Rep. 695; 5 Supp. 567..
Killed on British ship on high seas.
Cavanaugh v. Ocean St. Nav. Co., 30 St. Rep. 532; 9
Supp. 198; 19 Civ. Pro. 315; 33 St. Rep. 903; 11
Supp. 547; re-argument denied 35 St. Rep. 992, and.
12 Supp. 609; 19 Civ. Pro. 391; 13 Supp. 540.
Negligence of child.
Schlossberg v. Lahr, 60 How. Pr. 450.
See for same facts,
Patterson v. Harrington, 11 Pitts. L. J. 346.
Interest from date of death.
Manning v. Port Henry I. O. Co., 27 Hun, 219; 91 N-
Y. 664.
Personal injury.
fice v. Munn, 94 N. Y. 621.
Action against personal representatives of wrong-doer.
Hegerich v. Keddie, 32 Hun, 141; rev. 99 N. Y. 258;
dist. 51 Hun, 93, and 24 St. Rep. 179, and 5 Supp.
453; dist. 55 Hun, 141, and 28 St. Rep. 194, and 8
Supp. 252; explained 104 N. Y. 616, and 6 St. Rep-
493, and 25 Week. Dig. 570.
Reversal of award.
Avery v. State of New York, 105 N. Y. 636.
MISCELLANEOUS. 323
NO FACTS GIVEN.
Report of referee.
Elgie v. City of Troy, 37 Hun, 641; aff’d 109 N. Y.
635.
Damages.
Pryor v. Chadwick, 86 Hun, 75; 66 St. Rep. 874; 33
Supp. 1133.
General negligence of employees.
Haas v. Missionary Soc. of M. H. R., 6 Misc. 281; 26
Supp. 868.
Preference on trial calendar. :
Hayes v. Consolidated Gas Co., 60 St. Rep. 480; 143
N. Y. 641.
Services of wife.
London v. Cunningham, 1 Misc. 408; 49 St. Rep. 447;
20 Supp. 882.
Practice.
Wright v. Zimmerman, 21 Misc. 407.
Amendment of complaint.
Isola v. Weber, 13 Misc. G7; 68 St. Rep. 32; 34 Supp.
77; 1 Ann. Cas. 384; rev. 69 St. Rep. 691, and 2
Ann. Cas. 262, and 147 N. Y. 329; 12 App. Div. 267;
76 St. Rep. 615; 42 Supp. 615.
Notice of trial.
Mangone v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 21 Misc. 565.
New trial; limitation.
Patterson v. Hochster, 21 App. Div. 432.
Verdict of six cents not accepted by the court.
Rogan v. Mullins, 22 App. Div. 117.
Extra allowance.
Allen v. Albany Ry., 22 App. Div. 223.
Continuance of action by administrator de bonis non.
Mundt v. Glokner, 24 App. Div. 110; 20 Misc. 63; 78
St. Rep. 430; 44 Supp. 430; 3 Ann. Cas. 383.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Balloonist fell on field and injured it.
Guille v. Swan, 19 Johns. 381; applied 1 T. & C. 122.
Took wrong plank by mistake under an order.
Broughton v. Whallon, 8 Wend. 475.
24
MISCELLANEOUS.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Seller of hops negligently bound the bales‘and hops heated.
Keller v. Vanderveere, 5 Lans. 313; applied 64 Barb. 391.
Newspaper published a notice wrong.
Argall v. Bryant, 1 Sandf.,98.
Servant of plaintiff falsely imprisoned.
Woodward v. Washburn, 3 Denio, 369; approved 9
Abb. N. C. 393.
Defendant drove boy with threats into store; boy accidentally
turned faucet of wine cask.
Vandenburgh v. Truax, 4 Denio, 464; approved and
applied 1 T. & C. 123; approved 35 N. Y. 210; dist.
6N. Y. 335; dist. 55 N. Y. 119.
Infant threw stone at infant and hit eye.
Harvey v. Dunlap, Hill & D. Supp. 193.
A partner neglected to insure vessel.
Thorne v. Deas, 4 Johns. &4.
Negligently kept goods under attachment.
Jenner v. Joliffe, 6 Johns. 9; 9 Johns. 381; explained
and limited 5 Duer, 434.
Letter lost through negligence of clerk of postmaster; sued
postmaster.
Wiggins v. Hathaway, 6 Barb. 632.
Negligence in sending telegram to plaintiff guaranteeing ac-
count.
Dunning v. Roberts, 35 Barb. 463.
Servant of defendant killed trespasser entering under claim
of right.
Frazer v. Freeman, 43 N. Y. 566.
Procured an abortion upon plaintiff's wife which killed her.
Phillippi v. Wolff, 14 Abb. Pr. N. S. 196.
Counterclaim that painter bespattered walls.
“Garvey v. Dung, 30 How. Pr. 315.
Property taken on illegal attachment; sued attachor.
Wehle v. Butler, 2 J. & S. 215; 3 J. & S. 1; 12 Abb.
Pr. U. S. 139; 43 How. Pr. 5; aff'd 61 N. Y. 245;
limited 69 N. Y. 448; dist. 14 J. & S. 460.
Negligently gave receipt for goods.
Bassett v. Lederer, 1 Hun, 274; 3 T. & C. 671.
Burned trees in trespassing.
Skinner v. Wheeler, 2 Hun, 598.
MISCELLANEOUS. 325
UNCLASSIFIED.
Floating logs injured bridge.
Town of Pierrepont v. Lovelass, 4 Hun, 696.
Same case sub nom.,
Town of Pierrepont v. Loveless, rev. 72 N. Y. 211.
Third party let insurance payments lapse.
Ainsworth v. Blackus, 5 Hun, 414.
Upper bridge carried away and injured lower bridge.
Chenango Bridge Co. v. Paige, 8 Hun, 292; rev. 83
N. Y. 178.
Same case sub nom., .
Chenango Bridge Co. v. Lewis, 63 Barb. 111; dist. 77
N. Y. 51; followed 17 J. & S. 311.
Did not notify public of stolen bonds.
Maas v. Missouri, K. & T. R. R. Co., 11 Hun, 8; 83
N. Y. 223.
Neglected to examine mortgage.
Albany C. S. Bank v. Burdick, 20 Hun, 104; rev. 87
N. Y. 40; applied 134 N. Y. 65, and 45 St. Rep. 591;
applied 130 N. Y. 413, and 42 St. Rep. 513; applied
133 N. Y. 596, and 44 St. Rep. 754; applied 43 Hun,
527, and 18 Abb. N..C. 368, and 7 St. Rep. go; ap-
plied 51 Hun, 151, and 20 St. Rep. 584, and 4 Supp.
655; applied 13 St. Rep. 238; applied 16 St. Rep.
528, and 1 Supp. 37; applied 17 St. Rep. 196, and 1
Supp. 478, and 28 Week. Dig. 507; applied 32 St.
Rep. 380, and 10 Supp. 404; applied 38 St. Rep. 551,
and 14 Supp. 411; applied 41 St. Rep. 342, and 18
Supp. 102; applied 48 St. Rep. 247; dist. 104 N. Y.
143, and 5 St. Rep. 528, and 25 Week. Dig. 323; fol-
lowed 34 St. Rep. 117, and 11 Supp. 630.
Put up fence in right of way which interfered with hotel busi-
ness.
Avery v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 8 St. Rep. 612;
27 Week. Dig. 146; 106 N. Y. 142; applied 120 N.
Y. 456, and 31 SL. Rep. 695; dist. 108 N. Y. 187, and
13 St. Rep. 110, and 27 Week. Dig. 534; followed
115 N. Y. 374, and 26 St. Rep. 131; followed 121 N.
Y. 709, and 31 St. Rep. go2, and 25 Abb. N. C. 346,
and 3 Silv. 62; 17 St. Rep. 417; 2 Supp. 101; rev.
MISCELLANEOUS,
UNCLASSIFIED.
30 St. Rep. 471, and 121 N. Y. 31; followed 128 N.
Y. 468, and 40 St. Rep. 454; 24 St. Rep. 918; 6 Supp.
547; aff'd 117 N. Y. 660; 26 St. Rep. 279; 7 Supp.
341; 30 St. Rep. 239; 9 Supp. 404.
Jurisdiction of County Court.
Heenan v. N. Y., W. S. & B. Ry. Co., 34 Hun, 602;
dist. 41 Hun, 599, and 5 St. Rep. 278.
Negligently signed guarantee.
Page v. Krekey, 43 St. Rep. 468; 17 Supp. 764; rev.
50 St. Rep. 650, and 137 N. Y. 307.
Plaintiff went to warehouse on business and was assaulted by
defendant’s servant.
Meehan v. Morewood, 52 Hun, 566; 23 St. Rep. 487;
5 Supp. 710; aff'd 126 N. Y. 667.
Policeman shot plaintiff’s intestate.
Kain v. Larkin, 56 Hun, 79; 29 St. Rep. 643; 9 Supp.
89; 42 St. Rep. 571; 17 Supp. 226; rev. 43 St. Rep.
197, and 131 N. Y. 300; dist. 8 Misc. 650, and 61 St.
Rep. 59, and 29 Supp. 1044.
Wrong information.
Xiques v. Bradstreet Co., 70 Hun, 334; 53 St. Rep.
814; 24 Supp. 48; aff'd 58 St. Rep. 866, and 141 N.
Y. 605.
Collector for credit company which had sold baby carriage
assaulted purchaser.
O’Connel v. Samuel, 81 Hun, 357; 63 St. Rep. 143; 30
Supp. 889.
Officer of society for prevention of cruelty to animals killed
horse.
Sahr v. Scholle, 89 Hun, 42; 69 St. Rep. 453; 35 Supp.
@ 97.
Did not read deed before execution.
Smith v. Smith, 34 St. Rep. 116; 11 Supp. 630; aff'd
45 St. Rep. 591, and 134 N. Y. 62.
Defendant delivered clothing impregnated with disease to in-
fant plaintiff to wash.
Hattermann v. Siemann, 1 App. Div. 486; 72 St. Rep.
469; 37 Supp. 405.
Shield from explosion.
Laidlaw v. Sage, 73 Hun, 125; 56 St. Rep. 63; 25 Supp.
MISCELLANEOUS. 30%
UNCLASSIFIED.
955; 80 Hun, 550; 62 St. Rep. 374; 30 Supp. 496; 2
App. Div. 374; 73 St. Rep. 469; 37 Supp. 770.
Neglect of guardian of infant in not reducing estate to posses-
sion.
Buffalo Trust Co. v. Leonard, 9 App. Div. 384; 154
N. Y. £41.
Porter ejected plaintiff from defendant’s lodging-house.
Montgomery v. Sartirano, 16 App. Div. 95; 78 St. Rep.
1066 ; 44 Supp. 1066; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 758.
‘Window broken by hand cart.
Keep v. Walsh, 17 App. Div. 104; 78 St. Rep. 945; 44
Supp. 945; 2 Am. Neg. Rep. 763. ¢
Neglect of holder of first mortgage to speak.
Kingman v. Dunspaugh, 19 App. Div. 545.
Assault by defendant’s collector.
Feneran v. Singer Mig. Co., 20 App. Div. 574.
Neglected to demand salary.
Matter of Fitzgerald, 21 Misc. 226.
Insufficient water supply; could not put out fire.
Hamilton v. Owego Water Works, 22 App. Div. 573.
NUISANCE.
AWNINGS.
Awning or permanent wooden shed on sidewalk.
Trenor v. Jackson, 46 How. Pr. 389; 15 Abb. Pr. N.
S. 115.
Awning on street.
Brinkman v. Eisler, 26 St. Rep. 94; 7 Supp. 193; aff’d
4o St. Rep. 865, and 16 Supp. 154.
Awning of iron.
Hoey v. Gilroy, 37 St. Rep. 754; 14 Supp. 159; rev. 41
St. Rep. 181, and 129 N. Y. 132.
Awnings.
Farrell v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 20 St. Rep. 12; 5
Supp. 672; aff’d 22 St. Rep. 469, and 5 Supp. 580.
328 NUISANCE.
BARNS.
Barns for cattle feeding.
Cook v. City of Buffalo, 16 Week. Dig. 8.
Barn and manure.
Pickard v. Collins, 23 Barb. 444; harmonized 25 St.
Rep. 652, and 7 Supp. 38; applied 72 N. Y. 45.
Barn and sheds infected.
Van Wormer v. Mayor, etc., of Albany, 15 Wend. 262;
aff'd 18 Wend. 169; applied 119 N. Y. 236, and 29
St. Rep. 581; dist. 13 Barb. 4o; dist. 31 Barb. 455;
applied 32 How. Pr. 122; applied 33 How. Pr. 8;
followed 3 N. Y. 492.
ELEVATED RAILROAD.
Caro v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 14 J. & S. 138.
Lahr v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 4 St. Rep. 340; 25
Week. Dig. 543; 104 N. Y. 268; applied 120 N. Y.
288, and 30 St. Rep. 938; applied 56 Hun, 203, and
31 St. Rep. 106, and 9 Supp. 338; applied 31 St. Rep.
82, and g Supp. 130; applied 31 St. Rep. 113, and 9
Supp. 341; dist. 112 N. Y. 189, and 20 St. Rep 479:
dist. 121 N. Y. 520, and 31 St. Rep. 828; followed
120 N. Y. 183, and 30 St. Rep. 584: followed 122 N.
Y. 14, and 33 St. Rep. 475; followed 46 Hun. 532,
and 12 St. Rep. 500; followed 48 Hun, 564, and 16
St. Rep. 141, and 1 Supp. 174; reviewed 106 N. Y.
162, and 8 St. Rep. 599, and 27 Week. Dig. 87; re-
viewed 125 N. Y. 177, and 34 St. Rep. 876.
Drucker v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 19 J. & S. 429; aff'd 8
St. Rep. 599, and 27 Week. Dig. 87, and 106 N. Y.
157; applied 118 N. Y. 626, and 30 St. Rep. 36; ap-
plied 21 St. Rep. 72, and 4 Supp. 323; applied 31 St.
* Rep. 82, and g Supp. 130; applied 46 St. Rep. 196,
and 19 Supp. 223; dist. 121 N. Y. 520, and ai St.
Rep. 828; explained 56 Hun, 203, and 31 St. Rep.
106, and 9 Supp. 338; followed 128 N. Y. 497, and
40 St. Rep. 474.
Ireland v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 8 St. Rep. 127; 18
J. & S. 311; followed 23 J. & S. 555, and 14 St. Rep.
850; 32 Alb. L. J. 489; 20 J. & S. 450; followed 23
J. & S. 555, and 14 St. Rep. 850.
NUISANCE. 329
ELEVATED RAILROAD.
Seventh W. Nat. Bank v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 21
J. & S. 412; dist. 134 N. Y. 328, and 43 St. Rep. 474,
and 47 St. Rep. 635 ; harmonized 30 St. Rep. 239, and
Q Supp. 404.
Taylor v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 23 J. & S. 555;
28 J. & S. 311;harmonized 26 St. Rep. 282, and
Supp. 341.
Powers v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 30 St. Rep. 584; 120 N.
Y. 178; applied 122 N. Y. 16, and 33 St. Rep. 475;
applied 128 N. Y. 452, and 4o St. Rep. 445; applied
58 Hun, 522, and 36 St. Rep. 2, and 12 Supp. 848;
applied 26 Abb. N. C. 76, and 13 Supp. 908; applied
36 St. Rep. 45, and 13 Supp. 295; 27 J. & S. 191; 37
St. Rep. 893; 13 Supp. 599; 20 Civ. Pro. 78; 14
Supp. 130.
Patten v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 3 Abb. N. C. 306;
appeal dismissed 67 N. Y. 484; dist. 14 J. & S. 138,
160.
Spader v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 3 Abb. N. C. 467.
Peyser v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 13 Daly, 122; fol-
lowed 44 St. Rep. 877, and 18 Supp. 132.
Hussner v. Brooklyn City Ry. Co., 1 St. Rep. 772; 96
N. Y. 18; 23 St. Rep. 856; 114 N. Y. 433; dist. 121
N. Y. 521, and 31 St. Rep. 828.
Abendroth v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 7 St. Rep. 43; 19
Abb. N. C. 247; 22 J. & S. 417; which rev. 20 J. &
S. 274; aff'd 33 St. Rep. 475, and 122 N. Y. 1; fol-
lowed 130 N. Y. 111, and 41 St. Rep. 488; followed
25 J. & S. 270, and 25 St. Rep. 872, and 6 Supp. 898;
followed 25 J. & S. 417, and 29 St. Rep. 361, and 8
Supp. 313; followed 14 St. Rep. 860; 9 Civ. Pro.
Rep. 406.
Kearney v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 14 St. Rep. 854;
27 J. & S. 563; 37 St. Rep. 502; 13 Supp. 608; aff'd
41 St. Rep. 119, and 129 N. Y. 76; dist. 47 St. Rep.
635.
Carter v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 859: 25
J. & S. 279; 28 St. Rep. 581; 7 Supp. 678; aff’d 45 St.
Rep. 848, and 134 N. Y. 168.
a
7
‘
330 NUISANCE,
ELEVATED RAILROAD.
Stern v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 21 St. Rep. 71; 4
Supp. 323.
Moore v. N. Y. Elevated Ry. Co., 15 Daly, 510; 24
» Abb. N. C. 74; 29 St. Rep. 432; 8 Supp. 769; rev.
42 St. Rep. 588, and 130 N. Y. 523; 4 Misc. 132; 53
St. Rep. 169; 23 Supp. 863; 30 Abb. N. C. 306.
Mitchell v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 56 Hun, 543; 31
St. Rep. 80; 9 Supp. 130; aff’d 43 St. Rep. 476, and
132 N. Y. 552; 56 Hun, 543; 31 St. Rep. 625; 9
Supp. 829; aff'd 45 St. Rep. 318, and 134 N. Y. 111.
Porth v. Manhattan El. Ry. Co., 33 St. Rep. 709; 11
Supp. 633; 26 J. & S. 366; aff’d 134 N. Y. 615.
Mattlage v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 14 Daly, 11; 67
How. Pr. 232; 33 St. Rep. 918; 11 Supp. 482; 44 St.
Rep. 289; 17 Supp. 536; 47 St. Rep. 106; 19 Supp.
1015; 1 Misc. 339; 48 St. Rep. 683; 20 Supp. 624;
_14 Misc. 291; 70 St. Rep. 439; 35 Supp. 704.
Moss v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 36 St. Rep. 798.
Sperb v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 61 Hun, 539; 41
St. Rep. 155; 16 Supp. 392; rev. 50 St. Rep. 204, and
137 N. Y. 155; disapproved 44 St. Rep. 829, and 18
Supp. 205; disapproved 44 St. Rep. 877, and 18
Supp. 132; 44 St. Rep. 216; 17 Supp. 469.
Mundorf v. N. Y. Elevated Ry. Co., 62 Hun, 465; 42
St. Rep. 439; 17 Supp. 124.
Pond v. Metropolitan El. Ry. Co., 42 Hun, 567; 4 St.
Rep. 661; rev. 20 St. Rep. 479, and 112 N. Y. 186;
applied 122 N. Y. 15, and 33 St. Rep. 475; dist. 132
N. Y. 360, and 44 St. Rep. 567; followed 119 N. Y.
604, and 28 St. Rep. 483, and 2 Silv. 469; followed
56 Hun, 545, and 31 St. Rep. 625, and g Supp. 829.
«American Bk. N. Co. v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 27
J. & S. 175; 37 St. Rep. 885; 13 Supp. 626; modified
41 St. Rep. 531, and 129 N. Y. 252.
Ode v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 56 Hun, 199; 31 St. Rep.
106; 9 Supp. 338. :
Emigrant M. C. v. Brooklyn El. R. R. Co., 20 App.
Div. 596.
Rector v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 21 App. Div. 47.
NUISANCE. 331
FAT BOILING ESTABLISHMENTS.
Cropsey v. Murphy, 1 Hilt. 126.
Weil v. Schultz, 33 How. Pr. 7.
Peck v. Elder, 3 Sandt. 126; 3 Ch. Dec. 38; followed
18 Hun, 112.
Westheimer v. Schultz, 33 How. Pr. 11.
Blunt v. Hay, 4 Sandf. Ch. 362.
OBSTRUCTING HIGHWAY.
Bisbee v. Mansfield, 6 Johns. 84.
Sage v. Barnes, 9 Johns. 365.
Fletcher v. Auburn & S. R. R. Co., 25 Wend. 462; ap-
plied 3 Hill, 569; seems approved 12 N. Y. 486; ex-
plained 23 N. Y. 42; questioned 4 N. Y. 205; applied
. 4 Abb. N. C. 32; dist. 50 N. Y. 206; followed 29
Hun, 560.
Plant v. Long Island R. R. Co., 10 Barb. 26; explained
33 How. Pr. 39.
Fowler v. Mott, 19 Barb. 204.
Newman v. Nellis, 97 N. Y. 285; followed 47 Hun,
377, and 14 St. Rep. 576, and 28 Week. Dig. 59.
Saunders v. Townsend, 26 Hun, 308.
Metropolitan Exp. Co. v. Newton, 4 Supp. 593; 21 St.
Rep. 73.
Wakeman v. Wilbur, 51 Hun, 638; 21 St. Rep. 556;
4 Supp. 938; 71 St. Rep. 266; 147 N. Y. 657.
SLAUGHTER HOUSES.
Cronin v. People, 20 Hun, 137; aff’d 82 N. Y. 318; ap-
plied 55 Hun, 241, and 27 St. Rep. 767, and 7 Supp.
788.
Dubois v. Budlong, 15 Abb. Pr. 445.
Schuster v. Metropolitan Bd. of Health, 49 Barb. 450.
Cushing v. Board of Health, 13 St. Rep. 783.
Brady v. Weeks, 3 Barb. 157; followed 8 Abb. N. C.
355; reviewed 63 Barb. 255; applied 4 Lans. 52.
Catlin v. Valentine, 9 Paige, 575; commented on I
Abb. Pr. 475; relied on 37 N. Y. 683; reviewed 63
Barb. 255; examined 38 How. Pr. 180; followed 3
332
NUISANCE.
SLAUGHTER HOUSES.
Sandf. 131; applied 3 Barb. 159; applied 18 Hun,
112,
Taylor v. People, 6 Park. 347; 12 Hun, 212.
STABLES.
Robinson v. Smith, 25 St. Rep. 647; 7 Supp. 38.
Filson v. Crawford, 23 St. Rep. 335; 5 Supp. 882.
Stillwell v. Buffalo Riding Academy, 21 Abb. N. C.
472; 4 Supp. 414; followed 56 Hun, 308, and 30 St.
Rep. 608, and 9 Supp. 349; reviewed 4o St. Rep.
236, and 15 Supp. 790.
Horton v. Brownsey, 10 St. Rep. 800.
Morris v. Brower, Auth. N. P. 368.
STEAM RAILROADS.
Drake v. H. R. R. R. Co., 7 Barb. 508; followed 121
N. Y. 513, and 31 St. Rep. 828; explained and ap-
plied 14 J. & S. 138; explained 50 N. Y. 211; fol-
lowed 12 Abb. Fr. N. C. 124.
Hentz v. Long Island R. R. Co., 13 Barb. 646; dist. .
58 Hun, 521, and 36 St. Rep. 2, and 12 Supp. 848.
Cogswell v. N. Y.. N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 16 J. & S.
31; rev. 3 St. Rep. 56, and 12 Civ. Pro. 222, and 103
N. Y. 10; applied. 122 N. Y. 25, and 33 St. Rep.
246; applied 22 J. & S. 426, and 7 St. Rep. 43, and
19 Abb. N. C. 247; applied 49 Hun, 567, and 18 St.
Rep. 477, and 2 Supp. 289; applied 61 Hun, 152,
and 39 St. Rep. 952, and 15 Supp. 752, and 21 Civ.
Pro. 204; applied 65 Hun, 34, and 47 St. Rep. 64,
and 19 Supp. 603; applied 18 Abb. N. C. 341; ap-
plied ro St. Rep. 725; applied 14 St. Rep. 863;
applied 35 St. Rep. 736, and 13 Supp. 238; applied
44 St. Rep. 11, and 17 Supp. 336; applied 48 St. Rep.
424, and 20 Supp. 315; dist. 134 N. Y. 162, and 45
St. Rep. 774; followed 104 N. Y. 293, and 4 St. Rep.
340, and 25 Week. Dig. 543; followed 45 Hun, 258,
and 10 St. Rep. 374, and 27 Week. Dig. 130; 22 J.
& S. 92; rev. 7 St. Rep. 203, and 26 Week. Dig. 280,
and 105 N. Y. 319; applied 129 N. Y. 284, and 28
NUISANCE. 333
STEAM RAILROADS.
Abb. N. C. 1, and 41 St. Rep. 511, and 21 Civ. Pro.
420; dist. 65 Hun, 25, and 47 St. Rep. 60, and 19
Supp. 605, and 22 Civ. Pro. 380; dist. 43 St. Rep.
383, and 17 Supp. 881; followed 41 St. Rep. 683,
and 16 Supp. 434.
Pettit v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 86; 61
St. Rep. 718; 29 Supp. 1137.
Spring v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 385; 68 St.
Rep. 321; 34 Supp. 810.
Garvey v. Long Island R. R. Co., 9g App. Div. 254; 41
Supp. 397.
STREET RAILROADS.
Hamilton v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 9 Paige, 171.
Anderson v. Rochester, L. & N. F. R. R. Co., 9 How.
Pr. 553; explained and followed 67 Barb. 154; lim-
ited 53 N. Y. 574.
Prime v. Twenty-third St. R. R. Co., 1 Abb. N. C. 63.
Johnston v. Christopher & T. St. R. R. Co., 1 Abb. N.
C. 75 n.
Davis v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 14 N. Y. 506; 1
Duer, 451; approved 12 Abb. Pr. 171; 2 Duer, 666;
followed 111 N. Y. 38, and 19 St. Rep. 173; applied
3 Abb. Pr. N. S. 155; followed 28 Barb. 229; applied
32 Barb. 371; dist. 2 Hun, 181; applied 33 N. Y.
265; applied 15 Abb. Pr. N. S. 124; approved 27 N.
Y. 618; approved 31 How. Pr. 168; approved 12
Hun, 238; approved 3 Robt. 621; approved 22 Hun,
156; approved 12 Hun, 176; approved 67 Barb. 484;
dist. 20 N. Y. 361; dist. 21 N. Y. 531; applied 37
Barb. 303; applied 5 Robt. 382; applied 36 How.
Pr. 235; approved 18 N. Y. 163; dist. and applied
36 Barb. 167; applied 38 Barb. 287; which was aff’d
26 .N. Y. 297; applied 1 Hun, 648; applied 39 Barb.
501; which was aff’d 39 N. Y. 408; explained 33
Barb. 420; applied 13 Abb. Pr. N. S. 53; explained
and approved 2 Lans. 306.
Milhau v. Sharp, 15 Barb. 193; 17 Barb. 435; 9 How.
Pr. 102; aff'd 7 Abb. Pr. 220; 28 Barb. 228; aff'd
27 N. Y. 611; explained 45 N. Y. 173; followed 111
334
NUISANCE,
STREET RAILROADS.
N. Y. 38, and 19 St. Rep. 173; followed 4 St. Rep.
864; applied 18 Hun, 112: applied 78 N. Y. 431.
Wetmore v. Story, 22 Barb. 414; 3 Abb. Pr. 262; dist.
54 Hun, 434, and 27 St. Rep. 303, and 7 Supp. 464;
followed 11 Abb. Pr. 164.
Mahon v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 24 N. Y. 658; explained
37 N. Y. 472; dist. 78 N. Y. 423.
Wager v. Troy Union R. R. Co., 25 N. Y. 526; applied
121 N. Y. 514, arid 31 St. Rep. 828; followed 39
Barb. 499; which was aff'd 39 N. Y. 408; dist. 27
N. Y. 206; dist. 9 Abb. N. C. 181; followed 42 Barb.
469; dist. 86 N. Y. 127; dist. 64 N. Y. 75.
People v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 45 Barb. 63; 30 How.
Pr. 121.
TENEMENTS.
Meeker v. Van Rensselaer, 15 Wend. 397; applied 119
N. Y. 236, and. 2g St. Rep. 581; applied 55 Hun, 241,
and 27 St. Rep. 767, and 7 Supp. 788; questioned
46 Barb. 659.
Health Dept. of N. Y. v. Dassori, 21 App. Div. 348.
Golden v. Health Dept. of N. Y., 21 App. Div. 420.
Matter of Health Dept. v. Weekes, 22 App. Div. 110.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Advertising box around tree in street.
Goldsmith v. Jones, 43 How. Pr. 415.
Albany basin.
Lansing v. Smith, 8 Cow. 146: aff’d 4 Wend. 9; dist.
125 N. Y. 185, and 34 St. Rep. 876; dist. 133 N. Y-
e 86, and 44 St. Rep. 248; followed 103 N. Y. 257,
and 3 St. Rep. 48.
Ashes in highway.
Rogers v. Rogers, 14 Wend. 131.
Asphalt boiling establishment.
.Kavanaugh v. Barber, 59 Hun, 60; 35 St. Rep. 430;
12 Supp. 603; rev. 43 St. Rep. 283, and 131 N. Y.
211; 68 Hun, 183; 52 St. Rep. 290; 22 Supp. 874;
aff'd 149 N. Y. 608.
NUISANCE, 335
* UNCLASSIFIED.
Baby carriage being rolled upstairs in flat.
Pool v. Higginson, 8 Daly, 113.
Bees; keeping.
Olmstead v. Rich, 25 St. Rep. 271; 6 Supp. 826.
Billiard tables.
People v. Sergeant, 8 Cowen, 139; followed 52 Hun.
31, and 22 St. Rep. 78, and 4 Supp. 757.
Blacksmith.
Doeliner v. Tynan, 38 How. Pr. 176.
Blacksmith and paint shop.
Depierris v. Mattern, 10 Supp. 626.
Blasting at night.
Marvin v. Brewster Iron Co., 55 N. Y. 538; reargu-
ment denied 56 N. Y. 671.
Bone boiling establishment.
Buckman v. Green, 9 Hun, 225.
Bowling alley.
Updike v. Campbell, 4 E. D. Smith, 570.
Bowling alley.
Tanner v. Village of Albion, 5 Hill, 121; doubted 52
Hun, 31, and 22 St. Rep. 278, and 4 Supp. 757;
doubted but followed 4 E. D. Smith, 570.
Bridge across street.
Knox v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 55 Barb. 404; 38
How. Pr. 67.
Bridge; building another.
Fort Plain Bridge Co. v. Smith, 30 N. Y. 44.
Bridge; building another.
Newburgh & C. T. R. v. Miller, 5 Johns. Ch. ror; ap-
plied 121 N. Y. 569, and 31 St. Rep. 880.
Buildings on highway.
People v. Livingston, 27 Hun, 105.
Building in street.
Emmons v. Campbell, 22 Hun, 582.
Buildings obstructed lights.
Blunt v. McCormick, 3 Denio, 283.
Bulk-head at basin.
People v. Corporation of Albany, 11 Wend. 539; ex-
plained 57 Hun, 330, and 32 St. Rep. 411, and 10
Supp. 512: dist. 95 N. Y. 83.
336 NUISANCE,
UNCLASSIFIED.
Cabs at public stand.
Masterson v. Short, 3 Abb. Pr. N. S. 154; 7 Robt. 241;
33 How. Pr. 481; 7 Robt. 299; 35 How. Pr. 169;
disregarded 15 Abb. Pr. N. S. 115.
Canal bank cut to get water.
Attorney-General v. Cohoes Co., 6 Paige, 133.
Carriage stands in street.
McCaffrey v. Smith, 41 Hun, 117; 4 St. Rep. 11.
Chemical works.
Mulligan v. Elias, 12 Abb. Pr. N. S. 259.
Coal yard. Restriction in deed.
Barron v. Richard, 3 Edw. Ch. 96; aff’d 8 Paige, 251.
Coal yard.
Russel v. Popham, 4 Ch. Dec. 80; 3 Leg. Obs. 272.
Crematory.
Kobbe v. Village of New Brighton, 20 Misc. 477; 79
St. Rep. 777; 45 Supp. 777; aff'd 23 App. Div. 243.
Decayed vegetables deposited on lot.
City of Rochester v. Collins, 12 Barb. 559.
Distillery.
Prescott’s Case, 2 C. H. Rec. 161.
Distillery. :
Lynch’s Case, 6 C. H. Rec. 61.
Disorderly house.
Cranford .v. Tyrrell, 37 St. Rep. 967; 40 St. Rep. 414;
128 N. Y. 341.
Drivers; lines of disorderly, at brewery slop-house. ©
People v. Cunningham, 1 Denio, 524; applied 47 How.
Pr. 406; applied 2 T. & C. 241; approved 17 Hun,
70.
Dry dock moored opposite wharf.
* Penniman v. N. Y. Balance Co., 13 How. Pr. 40.
Fence, high board, covered with tar.
Pickard v. Collin, 23 Barb. 444; harmonized 25 St.
Rep. 652, and 7 Supp. 38; applied 72 N. Y. 45.
Gas company. =
Bohan v. Port Jervis G. L. Co., 48 Hun, 257; 10 St.
Rep. 374: 27 Week. Dig. 136; aff’d 33 St. Rep. 246,
and 122 N. Y. 18.
.
NUISANCE. nay
UNCLASSIFIED.
Gas works.
People v. N. Y. Gas Light Co., 64 Barb. 55; 6 Lans.
467.
Gases ; noxious.
Campbell v. Seaman, 2 T. & C. 231; aff'd 63 N. Y. 568;
applied 122 N. Y. 24, and 33 St. Rep. 246; followed
27 J. & S. 186, and 37 St. Rep. 885, and 13 Supp.
626; followed 22 Hun, 162.
Gunpowder in house.
People v. Sands, 1 Johns. 78; explained 8 Abb. N. C.
355-
Gunpowder house.
Bradley v. People, 56 Barb. 72.
Hospital for contagious diseases.
Gifford v. Babies’ Hospital, 21 Abb. N. C. 159; 17 St.
Rep. 886; 1 Supp. 448.
House in street.
Corning v. Lowerre, 6 Johns. Ch. 439; applied 121 N.
Y. 519, and 31 St. Rep. 828; applied 122 N. Y. 12,
and 33 St. Rep. 475.
House on right of way.
Clark v. Storrs, 4 Barb. 562.
Ice house.
Barrack v. Schifferdecker, 48 Hun, 355; 123 N. Y. 52.
Immigrant depot. Restriction in deed.
Pheenix v. Commissioners of Emigration, 12 How.
Pr. 1; 1 Abb. Pr. 466.
Immigrant landing place. 5
Brower v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 3 Barb. 254; dist.
7 Abb. Pr. 126.
Tron store house.
Parker v. Laney, 1 T. & C. 590; rev. 58 N. Y. 469.
Lamp-post and lamp in front of house.
Parsons v. Travis, 1 Duer, 439.
Lime factory.
Coe v. Shultz, 47 Barb. 64; 2 Abb. Pr. N. S. 193.
Limekilns.
Hutchins v. Smith, 63 Barb. 251.
Machinery in factory.
Benner v. Jordan, 2 Edm. S. C. 473.
[22]
338 NUISANCE.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Marble factory.
McKeon v. See, 4 Robt. 450; aff’d 51 N. Y. 300; modi-
fied 28 How. Pr. 238; applied 2 Supp. 246; applied 8
Daly, 149. ,
Marble works.
Butterfield v. Klaber, 52 How. Pr. 255.
Market stands on sidewalk.
Ely v. Campbell, 59 How. Pr. 333.
Market stalls on sidewalk.
St. John v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 3 Bosw. 483; fol-
lowed 59 How. Pr. 333; 6 Duer, 315; 13 How. Pr.
527; explained 4 Abb. Pr. 382; dist. 6 J. & S. 185.
Market stalls.
Hoffman v. Schultz, 31 How. Pr. 385.
Nets; fish.
Lawton v. Steele, 6 Supp. 15; aff'd 2y = Rep. 581,
and 119 N. Y. 226.
Nuisance; question of costs.
Le Roy v. Browne, 54 Hun, 584; 28 St. Rep. 210; 18
Civ. Pro. Rep. 125; 8 Supp. 82; 10 Supp. 328.
Oil refinery refuse contaminated wells.
Dillon v. Acme Oil Co., 49 Hun, 565; 18 St. Rep. 477;
2 Supp. 289.
Oil boiling factory.
Prout’s case, 4 C. H. Rec. 87.
Placard to beware of mock auctions.
Gilbert v. Mickle, 4 Sandf. Ch. 357.
Pumping machinery caused vibration of house.
Morton v. Mayor, 65 Hun, 32; 47 St. Rep. 64; 19
Supp. 603 ; 140 N. Y. 207.
Saw mill. Restriction in deed.
* Browner v. Jones, 23 Barb. 153.
Shed on pier.
Mayor, etc., of New York v. Cunard S. S. Co., 61 Hun,
346; 40 St. Rep. 781; 15 Supp. 904.
Show cases on sidewalk obstructed light in store.
Hallock v. Scheyer, 33 Hun, 111.
Show case on sidewalk.
People ex rel. Bentley v. Mayor, etc., of New York,
18 Abb. N. C. 123.
NUISANCE. 339
UNCLASSIFIED.
Show windows attracting a mob.
Elias v. Sutherland, 18 Abb. N. C. 126.
Show window drawing a crowd.
Jaques v. National Exhibit Co., 15 Abb. N. C. 250.
Shop windows; pantomime drew crowd.
Heather v. Hearn, 5 Supp. 85.
Sign swinging.
Mayor, etc., of New York v. Wood, 15° Daly, 341; 25
St. Rep. 907; 6 Supp. 657; followed 54 Hun, 611,
and 28 St. Rep. 37, and 8 Supp. 123.
Slops in street.
Board of Health v. Valentine, 32 St. Rep. 919; 11
Supp. 112.
Small-pox invalid placed in plaintiff’s house.
Boom v. City of Utica, 2 Barb. 104.
Smoke from stack of factory.
Beir v. Cooke, 37 Hun, 38..
Snioke stack of factory.
Catlin v. Patterson, 10 St. Rep. 724.
Soap factory.
Howard v. Lee, 3 Sandf. 281.
Stagnant canal slip.
Babcock v. City of Buffalo, 1 Sheld. 317; aff'd 56 N.
Y. 268.
Stagnant pond in unfilled stone quarry.
City of Rochester v. Simpson, 57 Hun, 36; 32 St. Rep.
732; 10 Supp. 499.
Stagnant water in pits.
Busch v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 34 St. Rep. 7;
12 Supp. 85.
Stagnant water made by bank.
People ex rel. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co. v. Board of
Health, 58 Hun, 595; 35 St. Rep. 411; 12 Supp. 561.
Steam engine; electric light.
Yocum v. Hotel St. G. Co., 18-Abb. N. C. 340.
Steam engine on next lot.
Birdsall v. Tiemann, 12 How. Pr. 551.
Steam engine in electric light station.
Braender v. Harlem Lighting Co., 2 Supp. 245.
340
NUISANCE.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Steam hammer.
Smith v. Ingersoll-Sergeant R. D. Co., 7 Misc. 374;
27 Supp. 907; rev. 12 Misc. 5, and 66 St. Rep. 727,
and 33 Supp. 70. ‘
Store extended cut off passage.
Shaver v. Cohn, 40 How. Pr. 129. >
Storehouse floating in Albany basin.
Hart v. Mayor, etc., of Albany, 3 Paige, 213; 9 Wend.
571; applied 119 N. Y. 236, and 2g St. Rep. 581; ap-
plied 55 Hun, 241, and 27 St. Rep. 767, and 7 Supp.
788; dist. 64 N. Y. 620; dist. 13 Abb. Pr. N.S. 11.
Storm door beyond house line.
Kiernan v. Newton, 20 Abb. N. C. 398.
Stream across highway fenced in.
Strickland v. Woolworth, 3 T. & C. 286.
Tannery.
Francis v. Schoelikof, 53 N. Y. 152; approved 128 N.
Y. 574, and a1 St. Rep. 117; examined 129 N. Y.
596, and 42 St. Rep. 247; explained 39 St. Rep. 323,
and 15 Supp. 10; applied 18 J. & S. 311; followed
19 Hun, 272; followed 7 Abb. N. C. 403.
Teas adulterated.
Health Dept. v. Purdon, 19 J. & S. 109; 99 N. Y. 237;
applied 19 St. Rep. 470, and 3 Supp. I.
Telegraph poles and wires.
People v. Metropolitan T. & T. Co., 64 How. Pr. 120;
11 Abb. N. C. 304; 2 Civ. Pro. 304; 31 Hun, 596.
Tenement house. Restriction in deed.
Amerman v. Deane, 25 J. & S. 175; 26 St. Rep. 165;
6 Supp. 542; rev. 44 St. Rep. 567, and 132 N. Y. 355;
re-argument denied 15 Supp. 327.
Tree overhung neighbor’s line.
Countryman v. Lighthill, 24 Hun, 405; dist. 36 St.
Rep. 769, and 12 Supp. 800; followed 29 St. Rep.
612, and 9 Supp. 97.
Vehicles; crowd at pier.
Harrison v. Newton, 9 Leg. Obs. 311, 347; 1 Code
Rep. N. S. 207.
i
NUISANCE. 341
. UNCLASSIFIED.
Vehicles backing on sidewalk.
Richardson & B. Co. v. Barstow Stove Co., 26 Abb.
N. C. 150; 36 St. Rep. 983.
Wagons and teams on sidewalk.
Flynn v. Taylor, 52 Hun, 167; 25 St. Rep. 338; 26 St.
Rep. 649; 6 Supp. 96; aff’d 40 St. Rep. 187, and 127
N. Y. 596.
Wood pile obstructed street and wharf.
Dougherty v. Bunting, 1 Sandf. 1.
Wood pile at side of highway.
Northrop v. Burrows, 10 Abb. Pr. 365.
Wires; electric light.
U. S. Illuminating Co. v. Grant, 55 Hun, 222; 27 St.
Rep. 767; 7 Supp. 788.
PRINCIPAL AND AGENT.
INSURANCE.
Bank did not keep up insurance.
Soule v. Union Bank, 45 Barb. 111; 30 How. Pr. 105.
Insurance agent did not keep tp policies.
Mason v. Wells, 2 Hun, 518.
Did not cancel policy.
American C. Ins. Co. v. Hagerty, 92 Hun, 26; 71 St.
Rep. 712; 36 Supp. 558; 21 Misc. 213; 79 St. Rep.
617; 45 Supp. 617.
Insurance brokers procured void foreign insurance.
Burges v. Jackson, 18 App. Div. 296. ’
STOCK BROKERS.
Sold pledged stock without proper notice.
Genet v. Howland, 45 Barb. 560; 30 How. Pr. 360.
Sold without instructions.
Hanks v. Drake, 49 Barb. 186; overruled 41 N. Y. 235.
Sold margined stock without notice.
Gruman v. Smith, 12 J. & S. 389; rev. 81 N. Y. 25;
followed 86 N. Y. 418; dist. 89 N. Y. 389; applied
15 J. & S. 61; dist. 63 How. Pr. 34.
342 PRINCIPAL AND AGENT.
STOCK BROKERS.
Sold stock on margin without authority.
Colt v. Owens, 15 J. & S. 430; 90 N. Y. 368.
Failed to sell.
Rider v. Sistare, 1¢ Daly, 90; 2 Supp. 715; 19 St. Rep.
g21,
Failed to sell.
Allen v. McConihe, 34 St. Rep. 994; 12 Supp. 232;
aff'd 36 St. Rep. 262, and 124 N. Y. 342.
General negligence.
Isham v. Post, 3 Misc. 184; 23 Supp. 211; aff'd 71
Hun, 184, and 54 St. Rep. 232, and 23 Supp. 1168;
rev. 56 St. Rep. 656, and 141 N. Y. 100.
Failed to sell.
Zimmermann v. Heil, 86 Hun, 114; 67 St. Rep. 136;
33 Supp. 391.
Sold without instructions.
Lazare v. Allen, 20 App. Div. 616.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Did not find insolvency of vendee.
Leverick v. Meigs, 1 Cowen, 645.
Manager of farm; care of stock.
Masters v. Stratton, 7 Hill, rot.
Did not find out insolvency of vendee.
Van Allen v. Vanderpool, 6 Johns. 69.
Management of estate.
Williams v. Phillips, 1 Civ. Pro. Rep. 88.
Remittance by factor lost.
Heubach v. Rother, 2 Duer, 227; 11 Leg. Obs. 269.
Sold without orders.
Milbank v. Dennistown, 1 Bosw. 246; rev. 21 N. Y.
® 386; 19 How. Pr. 126; 10 Bosw. 382.
Factor did not sell as instructed.
Scott v. Rogers, 31 N. Y. 676; criticised and dist. 5
Daly, 93; dist. 65 Barb. 328; applied 1 Hun, 192;
explained 53 N. Y. 219.
Defendant to cut, prepare and market certain timber; negli-
gent in cutting and selling.
Pike v. Nash, 1 Keyes, 335; 3 Abb. C. A. D. 610; 16
How. Pr. 53.
PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. 343
UNCLASSIFIED.
Neglected to sell hops.
Wombough v. Cooper, 2 Hun, 428.
Did not sell wool.
Whelan v. Lynch, 65 Barb. 326; aff’d 60 N. Y. 469;
dist. 124 N. Y. 348, and 36 St. Rep. 262; dist. 54
Hun, 101, and 26 St. Rep. 581, and 7 Supp. 220."
Agents abroad failed to purchase teas.
Heineman v. Heard, 58 Barb. 524; rev. 50 N. Y. 27;
applied 14 J. & S. 552; dist. 4 Redf. 415; 2 Hun, 324;
rev. 62 N. Y. 448; 4 T. & C. 666.
Del credere commission.
Loeb v. Hellman, 13 J. & S. 336; aff'd 83 N. Y. 601.
Custom house brokers; did not enter on first day.
Vernier v. Knauth, 7 App. Div. 57; 39 Supp. 784.
Investing money.
Van Cott v. Hull, 11 App. Div. 89; 76 St. Rep. 1060;
42 Supp. 1060.
PRINCIPAL AND SURETY.
DID NOT PROCEED UPON REQUEST.
Foreclosure of mortgage.
Did not foreclose upon request.
Russel v. Weinberg, 53 How. Pr. 468; 2 Abb. Pr. N.
C. 422; aff'd 4 Abb. Pr. N. C. 139.
Neglected to foreclose assigned mortgage.
Loomis v. Balheimer, 5 Abb. Pr. N. C. 263.
Did not foreclose upon request.
Mutual L. Ins. Co. v. Davies, 12 J. & S. 172; 56 How.
Pr. 440; followed 9 Abb. N. C. 372.
Did not foreclose upon request.
Northern Ins. Co. v. Wright, 13 Hun, 166; aff'd 76 N.
Y. 445; dist. r11 N. Y. 263, and 19 St. Rep. 363, and
22 Abb. N. C. 129; dist. 25 Hun, 44.
The rule not a favorite.
Hunt v. Purdy, 82 N. Y. 486; dist. 30 Hun, 266.
Assignee of mortgage not diligent.
Humphrey v. Hayes, 94 N. Y. 594.
144 PRINCIPAL AND SURETY.
DID NOT PROCEED UPON REQUEST.
Totes and bonds.
Pain v. Packard, 13 Johns. 174; disapproved 4 Hill,
656; examined and reaff’d 17 Johns. 390; which
rev. 2 Johns. Ch. 563; followed 5 Hun, 103; which
was aff'd 67 N. Y. 99; dist. 15 Johns. 434; dist. 45,
N. Y. 330; dist. 3 Wend. 217; dist. 6 Wend. 612;
which was aff'd 8 N. Y. 198; dist. go N. Y. 326;
explained and applied 64 N. Y. 464.
Fulton v. Matthews, 15 Johns. 433.
King v. Baldwin, 2 Johns. Ch. 554; rev. 17 Johns. 384;
examined 3 Barb. 540; criticised and doubted 3 N.
Y. 454; dist. 62 N. Y. 94; dist. 3 Wend. 217; criti-
cised and limited 8 Wend. 198; applied 1 Cow. 247;
applied 4 Lans. 197; applied 14 Wend. 171; ap-
proved 54 N. Y. 464; disapproved 4 Hill, 656; fol-
lowed 25 N. Y. 556; followed 67 N. Y. 99; followed.
€ 84 N. Y. 222; limited 25 Hun, 44.
Beardsley v. Warner, 6 Wend. 610; aff'd 8 Wend. 194.
Manchester I. M. Co. v. Sweetwig, 10 Wend. 162; ex-
plained 25 Hun, 44.
Huffman v. Hulbert, 13 Wend. 377; applied 8 Daly,
272; applied 25 Hun, 44.
Herrick v. Borst, 4 Hill, 650; applied 8 Daly, 272; fol-
lowed 25 Hun, 167.
Hazard v. Wells, 2 Abb. Pr. N. C. 444.
Walrod v. Ball, 9 Barb. 271.
Merritt v. Lincoln, 21 Barb. 249.
Thompson v. Hall, 45 Barb. 214; followed J. & S.
234; applied,4 Lans.'197; dist. 31 Hun, 446.
Singer v. Troftman, 49 Barb. 182.
Black River Bank v. Page, 44 N. Y. 453.
Warfield v. Trickey, 23 Week. Dig. 92.
Field v. Cutler, 4 Lans- 195.
Thayer v. King, 31 Hun, 437.
Wheeler v. Benedict, 36 Hun, 478.
Auburn Sav. Bank v. Brinkerhoff, 44 Hun, 142; 8 St.
Rep. 275; 26 Week. Dig. 306.
Remsen v. Beekman, 25 N. Y. 552; dist. 4 Lans. 197;
dist. 82 N. Y. 486; dist. 25 Hun, 44; dist. 25 Hun,
167:
PRINCIPAL AND SURETY. 345.
DID NOT PROCEED UPON REQUEST.
Notes and bonds.
Colgrove v. Tallman, 5 Hun, 103; 67 N. Y. 95.
Newcomb v. Hale, go N. Y. 326; dist. 5 St. Rep. 868;.
64 How. Pr. 400; dist. 13 St. Rep. 536, and 28 Week..
Dig. 362.
Toles v. Adee, 84 N. Y. 222; applied 114 N. Y. 565,.
and 24 St. Rep. 521; dist. 118 N. Y. 194, and 28 St.
Rep. 857; 91 N. Y. 562; applied 114 N. Y. 565, and
24 St. Rep. 521; dist. 61 Hun, 105, and 39 St. Rep.
581, and 15 Supp. 420.
Same case sub. nom.,
Toler v. Adee, 9 Week. Dig. 211; rev. 84 N. Y. 222.
Lawson v. Buckley, 49 Hun, 329; 17 St. Rep. 651; 2:
Supp. 178.
Coykendall v. Constable, 48 Hun, 360; 16 St. Rep.
432; 1 Supp. 9; 28 Week. Dig. 439; aff'd 99 N. Y..
309, and 117 N. Y. 625.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Neglected to collect note.
Cady: v. Sheldon, 38 Barb. 103.
Lacked diligence in prosecuting bond.
Craig v. Parkis, 4o N. Y. 181; applied 13 Hun, 168;:
applied 72 N. Y. 526; dist. 4 Lans. 195; explained
43 N. Y. 74. :
Deficiency on mortgage; did not enforce terms of first sale.
Goodwin v. Simonson, 74 N. Y. 133; dist. 25 Hun, 44;:
, dist. 25 Hun, 167.
Guaranty of rent; counterclaim damages.
Vann v. Rouse, 94 N. Y. 401; applied 60 Hun, 73, and
37 St. Rep. 664, and 14 Supp. 69; dist. 22 J. & S.
410, and 7 St. Rep. 55; followed 37 St. Rep. 313, and.
15 Supp. 107.
Os Did not enforce collection of collateral security.
Gilbert v. Marsh, 12 Hun, 5109.
Sureties sued; did not prosecute principal in time.
Salt Springs Nat. Bank v. Sloan, 57 Hun, 265; 22 St.
Rep. 652; 11 Supp. 32; 39 St. Rep. 771; 15 Supp..
306; rev. 48 St. Rep. 470; 135 N. Y. 371.
34.6 PRIVATE PREMISES.
PRIVATE- PREMISES.
ARRESTS AND ASSAULTS IN STORES, ETC.
Customer accused of thett and searched.
Mali v. Lord, 39 N. Y. 381; dist. 133 N. Y. 266, and 44
St. Rep. 824; followed 43 Hun, 339, and 6 St. Rep.
651; appiied 24 Hun, 506.
Assault upon patron by ticket man at theatre; sued proprietor.
Fowler v. Holmes, 24 St. Rep. 299; 3 Supp. 816.
Customer arrested and searched.
Mallach v. Ridley. 43 Hun, 336; 18 Week. Dig. 16; 6
St. Rep. 651; 15 St. Rep. 4; 24 Abb. N. C. 172; 9
Supp. 922; dist. 47 Hun, 347, and 14 St. Rep. 558.
Assault on customer in store.
Baylis v. Schwalbach Cycle Co., 38 St. Rep. 492; 14
Supp. 933.
Guest at Glen Island arrested.
Clark v. Starin, 47 Hun, 345; 14 St. Rep. 558.
Assault on customer in store. .
Meehan v. Moorewood, 52 Hun, 566; 23 St. Rep. 487;
5 Supp. 710; aff'd 126 N. Y. 667.
Cash boy snapped a pin at customer.
Swinarton v. Le Boutillier, 7 Misc. 639; 58 St. Rep.
345: 28 Supp. 53; 31 Abb. N. C. 281; aff’d 148 N. Y.
752.
BATHING ESTABLISHMENTS.
Drowned at bathing establishment ; no means of rescue.
Nugent v. Vanderveer, 38 Hun, 487; 39 Hun, 322.
Dove into shallow water. .
e Hinz v. Starin, 46 Hun, 526; 12 St. Rep. 606; 21 St.
Rep. 122; 3 Supp. 290; 2 Silv. 505; 25 St. Rep. 329;
6 Supp. 165; 32 St. Rep. 918; 10 Supp. 671; aff'd 124
N. Y. 639.
Bathing beach; hole in bottom.
Dinnihan v. Lake Ontario B. I. Co., 8 App. Div. 509;
40 Supp. 764.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 347
BLASTING.
Persons injured.
Rocks thrown against house; injured infant.
Pack v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 3 N. Y. 489; disap-
proved 2 Keyes, 294; which aff'd 28 Barb. 9;8N. Y.
222; applied 125 N. Y. 360, and 34 St. Rep. 971;
applied 26 Barb. 623; applied 38 Barb. 655; applied
7 Bosw. 513; applied 1 Daly, 128; applied 12 Hun,
303; applied 11 N. Y. 435; applied 61 N. Y. 182; ap-
plied 66 N. Y. 185; applied 72 N. Y. 214; applied
2 E. D. Smith, 255; applied 15 J. & S. 264; dist. 1
Bosw. 496; dist. 5 Duer, 498; dist. 17 N. Y. 106; com-
pared 29 N. Y. 591; examined 6 Daly, 469.
On next lot; defendant had contractor.
Cottner v. Bettner, 1 Bosw. 490.
Watching; ran back beyond flagman.
Devlin v. Gallagher, 6 Daly, 494.
Intestate killed by blast on Tenth Ave.
Koster v. Noonan, 8 Daly, 231.
Defendant was a contractor on canal.
St. Peter v. Denison, 58 N. Y. 416; dist. 124 N. Y. 610,
and 37 St. Rep. 234; dist. 134 N. Y. 162, and 45 St.
Rep. 774.
Defendant had contractor.
Wiener v. Hammell, 39 St. Rep. 198; 14 Supp. 365.
Property injured.
Injured building on adjoining premises.
Hay v. Cohoes Co., 3 Barb. 42; 2 N. Y. 159; dist. 134
N. Y. 162, and 45 St. Rep. 774; explained 42 St. Rep.
792, and’ 17 Supp. 22; followed 16 Daly, 196, and 31
St. Rep. 278, and 10 Supp. 115; limited 51 N. Y. 476;
dist. 55 N. Y. 538; examined 80 N. Y. 579; followed
58 N. Y. 416; applied 14 J. &. S. 138.
Same accident. /
Tremain v. Cohoes.Co., 2 N. Y. 163; dist. 134 N. Y.
162, and 48 St. Rep. 774; followed 16 Daly, 196, and
31 St. Rep. 278, and 10 Supp. 115; examined and ap-
plied 8 Abb. N. C. 355; applied 61 Barb. 106; applied
35 N. Y. 523.
348 PRIVATE PREMISES.
BLASTING.
2poperty injured.
Split rock in next lot and injured foundation of house.
Gourdier v. Cormack, 2 E. D. Smith, 200; 2 E. D.
Smith, 254.
Building aqueduct.
Matter of Thompson, 15 St. Rep. 907; 2 Supp. 34; 28
Week. Dig. 564.
Sub-contractor for R. R. Pieces of rock thrown on houses.
Locklin v. Beckwith, 6 St. Rep. 583.
Injured property on next lot.
Rogers v. Hanfield, 12 St. Rep. 671; 14 Daly, 339; 27
Week Dig. 354.
Defendant had contractor.
McCafferty v. Spuyten Duyvil & P. M. R. R. Co., 61
N. Y. 178; 48 How. Pr. 44; dist. 25 St. Rep. 889, and’
6 Supp. 921; applied 30 Hun, 391.
Blasting in street.
Buddin v. Fortunato, 31 St. Rep. 278; 10 Supp. 1153.
16 Daly, 195.
Owner who was sued had contractor.
. Berg v. Parsons, 84 Hun, 60; 65 St. Rep. 31; 31 Supp.
1091 ; yo Hun, 267; 70 St. Rep. 284; 35 Supp. 780.
Sued owner, who had contractor.
Roemer v. Striker, 2 Misc. 573; 21 Supp. 1090; aff'd 58.
St. Rep. 615, and 142 N. Y. 134.
Loosened soil in next yard and clothes pole fell.
Denken v. Canavan, 17 Misc. 392; 39 Supp. 1078.
+
Unclassified.
Killed person. Using foot path and had for many years.
Driscoll v. Newark & R. L. & C. Co., 37 N. Y. 637.
Hellgate blasting injured dwelling.
Benner v. Atlantic Dredging Co., 58 Hun, 359; 34 5t..
Rep. 632; 12 Supp. 181; rev. 45 St. Rep. 774, and 134.
N. Y. 156.
Injured building; sued contractor for railroad.
Newell v. Woolfolk, 91 Hun, 211; 71 St. Rep. 129; 36:
Supp. 327.
Ceilings of next house fell.
French v. Vix, 2 Misc. 312; 50 St. Rep. 577; 21 Supp..
PRIVATE PREMISES. 349
BLASTING.
Unclassified.
1016; 30 Abb. N. C. 158; aff’d 60 St. Rep. 469, and
143 N. Y. 90.
House shaken and walls weakened.
Booth v. R.. W. & O. R. R. Co., 44 St. Rep. 9; 14 Supp.
336; 55 St. Rep. 656; 140 N. Y. 267.
Dismissal of complaint reversed.
Kratzer v. Village of Saratoga Springs, 8 App. Div. 613;
40 Supp. 474.
Sued owner and contractor.
Hill v. Schneider, 13 App. Div. 299; 77 St. Rep. 1; 43
Supp. I.
Derricks.
Corporate existence not proven.
Derrenbacher v. Lehigh Valley Ry. Co., 21 Hun, 6123-
59 How. Pr. 283; 87 N. Y. 636.
Infant playing.
Jonash v. Standard Gaslight Co., 21 St. Rep. 464; 4
Supp. 542; 14 J. & S. 447; aff'd 117 N. Y. 641.
Detrick fell on dock.
Thomas v. Henges, 42 St. Rep. 28; 16 Supp. 700; aff'd
43 St. Rep. 288, and 131 N. Y. 453.
Boom fell on plaintiff.
Kelly v. Pelham Hod El. Co., 51 St. Rep. 549; 21 Supp.
T107. ‘
Cable of derrick fell.
Rosenhain v. Galligan, 5 App. Div. 49; 74 St. Rep. 135;
38 Supp. 713.
Boom of derrick fell.
Reed v. McCord, 18 App. Div. 38r.
ELEVATORS.
Dumb waiters.
Bottles being raised, fell off upon plaintiff.
Ritterman v. Ropet, 19 J. & S. 25.
Delivering ice. Rope broke and dumb waiter fell on him.
Turnier v. Lathers, 36 St. Rep. 821; 13 Supp. 500.
Rope broke; fell on plaintiff.
Krey v. Schlussner, 42 St. Rep. 917; 16 Supp. 695.
350 PRIVATE PREMISES.
ELEVATORS.
Dumb waiters.
Rope broke.
Holzman v. Monell, 19 App. Div. 238.
Unclassified. «
Child drawn by curiosity to unguarded elevator near street;
crushed by car.
Mullaney v. Spence, 15 Abb. Pr. N. S. 319; applied 1
Abb. N. C. 427, which was rev. 70 N. Y. 126.
Went to get work. Killed by elevator; landing unguarded.
Pierce v. Rawson Mfg. Co., 20 Week. Dig. 256.
Only question of damages.
Barnes v. Keene, 115 N. Y. 638; 42 St. Rep. 853; 132
N. Y. 13. ;
Caught foot between elevator floor and top of door.
Mitchell v. Keene, 87 Hun, 266; 67 St. Rep. 731; 33
Supp. 1045. :
Jolt threw plaintiff out of elevator.
McGrell v. Buffalo Office Bldg. Co., go Hun, 30; 70 St.
Rep. 372; 35 Supp. 599; rev. 153 N. Y. 265.
Boy called by elevator man to do errand; looked over gate and
was hit.
Guichard v. New, 84 Hun, 54; 65 St. Rep. 20; 31 Supp.
1080; 9 App. Div. 485; 75 St. Rep. 853; 41 Supp.
450.
Guest at hotel; elevator fell.
Stott v. Churchill, 15 Misc. 80; 71 St. Rep. 441; 36
Supp. 476.
Caught in elevator.
Shaier a Pabad viens Imp. Co., 22 App. Div. 102.
wt
~
‘ EXPLOSIONS.
Boilers.
Neighboring buildings injured; boiler defective in manufac-
ture.
Losee v. Buchanan, 61 Barb. 86; rev. 51 N. Y. 476;
dist. 52 Hun, 54, and 22 St. Rep. 224, and 4 Supp.
753; explained 23 J. & S. 393, and 14 St. Rep. 713;
followed 122 N. Y. 124, and 33 St. Rep. 287; dist. 57
N. Y. 567.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 351
EXPLOSIONS.
Boilers.
Same accident ; suit against manufacturer.
Losee v. Clute, 51 N. Y. 494; followed 55 Hun, 196, and
27 St. Rep. 941, and 7 Supp. 821; dist. 56 N. Y. 124.
Testing boiler near highway ; pedestrian injured.
Ochsenbein v. Shapley, 85 N. Y. 214.
Unclassified.
Gunpowder.
Myers v. Malcolm, 6 Hill, 292; explained 19 Barb. 256;
limited 30 N. Y. 289; followed 56 Barb. 73; applied
80 N. Y. 579; applied 8 Abb. N. C. 355; which rev.
16 Hun, 259; applied 118 N. Y. 82, and 27 St. Rep.
865.
Gunpowder.
Heeg v. Licht, 16 Hun, 257; rev. 80 N. Y. 579; 8 Abb.
N. C. 355; applied 122 N. Y. 24, and 33 St. Rep. 246.
Gas. Went into public building on business.
Vincent v. City of Brooklyn, 31 Hun, 122.
Gas.
Jackman v. Lord, 56 Hun, 192; 30 St. Rep. 507; 9 Supp.
200; followed 45 St. Rep. 332, and 18 Supp. 523.
Torpedo in artesian well.
Doyle v. Rector, etc. of Trinity Church, 5 St. Rep. 53;
2 Silv. 468; 28 St. Rep. 972; 118 N. Y. 678; 30 St.
Rep. 888; 15 Supp. 626; aff’d 45 St. Rep. 205, and 133
N. Y. 372.
Naptha.
Wallace v. Vacuum Oil Co., 35 St. Rep. 697; 12 Supp.
425; aff'd 38 St. Rep. 441, and 3 Silv. 478, and 128
N. Y. 579.
Explosion of fly wheel. Pieces went into house across the
street.
Piehl v. Albany Ry. Co., 19 App. Div. 528; 39 Supp.
TI31.
Gas. Employees of Insurance Company left pipes discon-
nected.
McCauley v. Fidelity &’C. Co., 16 Misc. 574; 74 St. Rep.
113; 38 Supp. 773.
Same case sub nom.,
McCauley v. Hutkoff, 20 Misc. 97; 79 St. Rep. 85; 45
Supp. 85.
352 PRIVATE PREMISES.
FALLING THINGS.
Walls and buildings.
Defendants had contractors to build; wall fell on neighbor and
injured person and property. ;
Heffernan v. Benkard, 1 Robt. 432; applied 14 Daly,
273, and 8 St. Rep. 358.
Wall fell on neighbor’s house and killed child.
Seabrook v. Hecker, 2 Robt. 291; 4 Robt. 344.
House fell; injured property.
Jarvis v. Baxter, 20 J. & S. 109.
Contractor putting additional story on engine house; wall fell
on neighbor's house.
Van Wert v. City of Brooklyn, 28 How. Pr. 451.
Wall fell; injured property. Sued contractor of man building
wall.
Benedict v. Martin, 36 Barb. 288; dist. 25 St. Rep. 889,
and 6 Supp. 921.
Shed fell on neighbor.
Benson v. Suarez, 43 Barb. 408; 19 Abb. Pr. 61; 28
How. Pr. 511; limited 56 N. Y. 120.
Retaining wall for surface water of street across plaintiff's
premises fell and injured mill.
Ludlow v. Village of Yonkers, 43 Barb. 493.
Building fell on adjoining building and killed person; superin-
tendent of buildings sued.
Connors v. Adams, 13 Hun, 427.
Wall left standing after fire fell on adjoining premises; killed
person.
Cain v. City of Syracuse, 29 Hun, 105; aff’d 95 N. Y. 83.
Working on track; wall of adjoining building fell on him.
Timlin v. Standard Oil Co., 54 Hun, 44; 26 St. Rep. 42;
7 Supp. 158; rev. 37 St. Rep. 906, and 126 N. Y. 514;
dist. 132 N. Y. 502, and 44 St. Rep. 863; dist. 41 St.
Rep. 770, and 16 Supp. 563.
Contractor taking down wall for defendant; it fell on neigh-
bor’s wife; sued owner.
Engel v. Eureka Club, 59 Hun, 593; 37 St. Rep. 527;
14 Supp. 184; 45 St. Rep. 940; 18 Supp. 945; rev. 50
St. Rep. 188, and 137 N. Y. 100.
Wall fell on neighbor ; defendant had contractor.
Negus v. Becker, 68 Hun, 293; 52 St. Rep. 283; 22
PRIVATE PREMISES. 353
FALLING THINGS.
Walls and buildings.
Supp. 986; rev. 62 St. Rep. 303, and 143 N. Y. 303;
72 Hun, 479; 54 St. Rep. 851; 25 Supp. 640.
Working on track ; wall of neighboring fell on plaintiff.
Mickee v. Wood M. & R. M. Co., 70 Hun, 456; 53 St.
Rep. 689; 24 Supp. 501; 77 Hun, 559; 60 St. Rep.
282; 28 Supp. 918.
Wall fell and injured property.
McCabe v. O’Connor, 4 App. Div. 354; 74 St. Rep. 200;
38 Supp. 572.
Unclassified.
Customer went to saw mill; plank whirled against him.
Ackert v. Lansing, 48 How. Pr. 374; 59 N. Y. 646; 6
Hun, 476; dist. 111 N. Y. 327, and 19 St. Rep. 355.
Customer in store hit by hogshead falling down hatchway.
Weinhold v. Acker, 17 J. & S. 182; dist. 11: N. Y. 327,
and 19 St. Rep. 355. .
Window-sash in store fell.
Odell v. Solomon, 16 St. Rep. 577; 18 J. & S. 119; 99
N. Y. 635.
Sign fell on child playing in yard.
Otten v. Cohen, 1 Supp. 430.
Grating of coal hatchway fell on servant of coal contractor de-
livering coal at court-heouse.
Galvin v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 22 J. & S. 295; rev.
20 St. Rep. 569, and 112 N. Y. 223; dist. 124 N. Y.
657, and 36 St. Rep. 476.
Defendants were upper tenants; box fell through hatch upon
servant of lower tenant.
Lyons v. Rosenthal, 11 Hun, 46.
Employee entering building hit by things thrown down.
Post v. Stockwell, 44 Hun, 28; 7 St. Rep. 482; 26 Week.
Dig. 332.
Boy drawn by curiosity went on ferry bridge; bolt pulled out
and hit him.
Fitzpatrick v. Garrison’s Ferry Co., 49 Hun, 288; 17
St. Rep. 736; 1 Supp. 794.
Customer of ice dealer hit by cake of ice.
Allen v. Banks, 7 App. Div. 405; 39 Supp. 1016.
[23]
354 PRIVATE PREMISES.
FALLS.
Into doors and holes.
Fell into hole made by servant in repairing house.
O’Connell v. Hillyard, 2 City Ct. 28.
In building on business; fell into opening into cellar; un-
guarded. ’
Dunn v. Durant, o Daly, 380.
Hole in school-room floor; sued School Trustees.
Bassett v. Fish, 12 Hun, 209; rev. 75 N. Y. 303; dist.
48 St. Rep. 874, and 20 Supp. 971; dist. 29 Hun, 108;
dist. 14 J. & S. 115; followed 89 N. Y. 22; which rev.
25 Hun, 475.
Open cellar door in store.
James v. Ford, 30 St. Rep. 667; 9 Supp. 504; 16 Daly,
126.
Customer walked into holc in floor of store.
Jones v. Sagar Co., 37 St. Rep. 346; 14 Supp. 57.
Machinist to repair fell into hole in cellar.
Homer v. Everett, 15 J. & S. 298; aff'd ot N. Y. 641.
Blind man fell down hatchway of warehouse close to door;
mistook steps for dwelling.
Oyshterbank v. Gardner, 17 J. & 8. 263.
Walked off unguarded piazza at inn at a ball.
Camp v. Wood, 76 N. Y. 92; dist. 98 N. Y. 255; dist.
26 St. Rep. 691, and 7 Supp. 195; dist. 39 St. Rep.
461, and 15 Supp. 162; dist. 25 Hun, 634; dist. 30
Hun, 596.
Infant at brewery to get slops; went into tunnel to urinate;
iron grating tipped.
Castoriano v. Miller, 15 Misc. 254; 71 St. Rep. 470; 36
Supp. 419.
Fell through trap door in greenhouse.
» parks v. Siebrecht, 19 App. Div. 117.
Into elevator shafts.
Policeman entered store through open window; fell into hoist-
way. ;
Ryan v. Thompson, 6 J. & S. 133.
Elevator door left open; fell into shaft. One tenant sued an-
other.
Donnelly v. Jenkins, 9 Daly, 41; 58 How. Pr. 252; fol-
lowed 37 St. Rep. 511, and 13 Supp. 889.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 355
FALLS.
Into elevator shafts.
Customer.
McRickard v. Flint, 1 St. Rep. 609; 97 N. Y. 641; 13
Daly, 541; aff'd 23 St. Rep. 100, and 114 N. Y. 222;
dist. 28 Abb. N. C. 141, and 45 St. Rep. 285, and 18
Supp. 106; explained 114 N. Y. 226, and 23 St. Rep.
100.
Customer fell into elevator shaft in store.
Harris v. Perry, 23 Hun, 244; 89 N. Y. 308; dist. 36 St.
Rep. 454, and 12 Supp. 792.
In warehouse to deliver boxes.
Flannigan v. American G. Co., 33 St. Rep. 867; 11
Supp. 688.
Unloading safe; elevator started; safe hit intestate; down
shaft.
Murphy v. Hays, 68 Hun, 450; 52 St. Rep. 749; 23
Supp. 70; 64 St. Rep. 824; 145 N. Y. 370.
Walked into shaft; man on duty did not stop him.
Morrison v. Metropolitan Tel. Co., 69 Hun, 100; 52 St.
Rep. 601 ; 23 Supp. 257; 72 Hun, 194; 30 Abb. N. C.
143; 144 N. Y. 703.
In store.
Sunderlin v. Hollister, 4 App. Div. 478; 38 Supp. 682.
Into tanks and vats.
Fell into vat at factory.
Victory v. Baker, 67 N. Y. 366.
Switchman stepped into sunken barrel.
Bosworth v. Standard Oil Co., 92 Hun, 485; 72 St. Rep.
195; 37 Supp. 43,
Stairs.
Stairway in store.
Larkin v. O’Neill, 48 Hun, 591; 16 St. Rep. 28; 1 Supp.
232; rev. 29 St. Rep. 34, and 119 N. Y. 221.
Defective railing on stairway; defendants were trustees.
Butler v. Townsend, 84 Hun, 100; 65 St. Rep, 33; 31
Supp. 1094.
356 PRIVATE PREMISES.
FALLS.
Things giving way.
Painter fastened scaffold to chimney of adjoining house; de-
fendant had moved rope.
Phillips v. Wilpers, 2 Lans. 389.
Plaintiff went to defendant’s house to hire it; fell through rot-
ten piazza.
Fleis v. Endicott, 15 Week. Dig. 7.
Hotel piazza fell; great crowd.
Converse v. Walker, 30 Hun, 506.
Glazier fell from window. Iron bars pulled out.
Shillak v. White, 38 St. Rep. 483; 14 Supp. 637; aff'd
49 St. Rep. 913, and 136 N. Y. 625. °
Saddle in riding school turned.
Wilson v. Dickel, 7 App. Div. 175; 74 St. Rep. 657; 40
Supp. 45.
Steps of cellar of leased premises fell while putting barrel in.
Trustees as owners sued.
Keating v. Stevenson, 21 App. Div. 605.
Unclassified.
Boy fell down stairs in store while mother was buying.
Donnelly v. Kelly, 2 City Ct. 11, note. .
Trespassing child fell off scaffold.
Martin v. Cahill, 39 Hun, 445.
Customer slipped on piece of fat under sawdust on floor of
grocery.
Shaw v. Webber, 79 Hun, 307; 61 St. Rep. 430; 29
Supp. 437; aff'd 151 N. Y. 655.
Defective entrance to store.
Black v. Maitland, 1 App. Div. 6; 71 St. Rep. 669; 36
Supp. 739; 11 App. Div. 188; 76 St. Rep. 653; 42
° Supp. 653.
FENCES.
Cattle passed through defective fence; ate unripe corn and
died. ;
Clark v. Brown, 18 Wend. 229.
Animal injured on division barbed wire fence.
Rowland v. Baird, 18 Abb. N. C. 256.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 357
FENCES.
Barbed wire fence injured horse,
Rehler v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 28 St. Rep.
311; 8 Supp. 280.
Horse cut by barbed wire division fence.
Roney v. Aldrich, 44 Hun, 320; 7 St. Rep. 669.
Colt strayed through fence into morass.
Crandall v. Eldridge, 46 Hun, 411; 12 St. Rep. 399; 27
Week. Dig. 484.
Buckthorn division fence injured animal.
Stisser v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 19 App. Div.
528.
Barbed wire division fence.
Buckley v. Clark, 21 Misc. 138.
FIRES.
Fire spread from burning fallow.
Clark v. Foot, 8 Jchns. 421.
Fire spread to neighbor from burning fallow.
Stuart v. Hawley, 22 Barb. 619; doubted 6 Hun, 320.
Steam dredge; excavating canal.
Hinds v. Barton, 25 N. Y. 544; applied 11 Hun, 217.
Fire spread to neighbor.
Simons v. Monier, 29 Barb. 419.
Sparks from steam dredge.
Teall v. Barton, 40 Barb. 137.
Fire spread from log heaps.
Calkins v. Barger, 44 Barb. 424.
Sufficiency of notice of appeal.
Ross v. Colby, 3 Hun, 546.
Fire on land spread.
Hays v. Miller, 6 Hun, 320; aff'd 70 N. Y. 112.
Fire spread from burning fallow to neighbor; no guard at
night.
Porter v. Beale, 13 Week. Dig. 205.
Burning fallow land.
Ferguson v. Hubbell, 26 Hun, 250; 14 Week. Dig. 118;
rev. 97 N. Y. 507; applied 118 N. Y. 430, and 29 St.
Rep. 790; applied 55 Hun, 513, and 29 St. Rep. 755,
and 8 Supp. 780; followed 123 N. Y. 233, and 33 St.
Ren. 486.
358
PRIVATE PREMISES.
FIRES.
Sparks from smoke-stack of factory.
Reiper v. Nichols, 31 Hun, 491.
Same fire.
Read v. Nichols, 28 St. Rep. 867; 118 N. Y. 224; dist.
62 Hun, 185, and 41 St. Rep. 217, and 16 Supp. 499.
Vessel at next dock.
Cosulich v. Standard Oil Co., 14 St. Rep. 713; 23 J. &
S. 384; rev. 33 St. Rep. 287, and 122 N. Y. 118.
Fire spread to adjoining apartment.
Loeber v. Roberts, 32 St. Rep. 95; 9 Supp. 718; 28 J. &
S. 202; 42 St. Rep. 687; 17 Supp. 378; aff’d 51 St.
Rep. 932, and 128 N. Y. 606.
Burning brush.
McGibbon v. Baxter, 51 Hun, 587; 22 St. Rep. 107; 4
Supp. 382. ,
Workman in leased factory sued owner. Fire; no fire-escapes.
McLaughlin v. Armfield, 58 Hun, 376; 34 St. Rep. 886;
12 Supp. 164.
Plaintiffs sold hay to defendants, which had to be pressed; no
spark-arrester on the engine; barn set on fire.
Dennis v. Harris, 46 St. Rep. 525; 19 Supp. 524.
Spark from chimney of smelting furnace.
Campbell v. U. S. Foundry, 73 Hun, 576; 57 St. Rep.
265; 26 Supp. 165.
LATERAL SUPPORT.
Undermined bank near line.
Gardner v. Heart, 2 Barb. 165; rev. 1 N. Y. 528; 1 Den.
466; 3 Den. 236; followed 118 N. Y. 140, and 28 St.
Rep. 761.
Dug too near neighbor's foundation.
® lLasala v. Holbrook, 4 Paige, 169; dist. 44 St. Rep. 10,
and 17 Supp. 336.
Party wall fell in taking down adjoining building; defendant
had contractor.
Earl v. Beadleston, 10 J. & S. 294.
Excavating sand bank; dug below surface.
Williams v. Kenney, 14 Barb. 629.
Excavated in brick yard.
Ferrand v. Marshall, 19 Barb. 380; 21 Barb. 409.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 359
LATERAL SUPPORT.
Building exposed in excavating for pier; fell.
Austin v. H. R. R. R. Co., 25 N. Y. 3343 criticised 63
. Hun, 490, and 45 St. Rep. 340, and 18 Supp. 376; ex-
plained 6 Daly, 291.
Contractor of defendant injured party wall.
Keller v. Abraham, 22 Week. Dig. 40; 13 Daly, 188.
Foundation undermined.
Coster v. Mayor, etc. of Albany, 52 Barb. 276; rev. 43
N. Y. 399; dist. 130 N. Y. 114, and 41 St. Rep. 488;
applied 3 Abb. N. C. 399; applied 3 Abb. N. C. 507;
applied 55 N. Y. 490; examined 85 N. Y. 30; followed
53 N. Y. 629; which aff'd 5 Lans. 524.
Undermined wall on line.
People ex rel. Bariow v. Canal Board, 2 T. & C. 275.
Land slid; excavating for roadbed.
Ludlow v. H. R. R. R. Co., 4 Hun, 239; 6 Lans. 128;
°6T. & C. 420.
Injunction to prevent excavation.
Ryckman v. Gillis, 6 Lans. 79; rev. 57 N. Y.68;6T. &
C. 422.
Removing rock injured stzble.
King v. Livermore, 9 Hun, 298; aff'd 71 N. Y. 605; dist.
25 St. Rep. 889, and 6 Supp. g2r.
Excavation of cellar in New York City.
Dorrity v. Rapp, 11 Hun, 374; rev. 72 N. Y. 307; 4 Abb.
N. C. 292.
Neighbor digging ditch in street.
Milburn v. Fowler, 27 Hun, 568.
Excavating near line injured building.
Bernheimer v. Kilpatrick, 53 Hun, 316; 25 St. Rep.
837; 6 Supp. 858; aff'd 127 N. Y. 672.
Wall injured; excavating for next foundation.
Hart v. Ryan, 25 St. Rep. 886; 6 Supp. 921.
Did not protect adjoining wall.
Cohen v. Simmons, 50 St. Rep. 146; 21 Supp. 385; aff'd
60 St. Rep. 870, and 142 N. Y. 671.
MACHINERY.
Went to seek work. Lever of whimsey slipped and hit him.
Larmore v. Crown Point Iron Co., 1 St. Rep. 43; 101
360 « PRIVATE PREMISES.
MACHINERY.
N. Y. 391; dist: 104 N. Y. 366, and 5 St. Rep. 722,
and 25 Week. Dig. 514; followed 115 N. Y. 61, and
23 St. Rep. 548; followed 132 N. Y. 506, and 44 St.
Rep. 863; harmonized 12 St. Rep. 95.
Infant got whip for defendant on mowing machine.
Weaver v. Bullis, 38 St. Rep. 989; 14 Supp. 338;. aff’d
128 N. Y. 634.
Laying wall between defendant and neighbor; caught clothing
in set screw of shaft near wall.
Horton v. Vulcan Iron Works Co., 13 App. Div. 508;
77 St. Rep. 699; 43 Supp. 699.
SCHOOL YARDS.
Infant ; remains of house at side of school.
Miller v. McClosky, 9 Abb. N. C. 303.
Fell into cellar way of school building.
Donovan v. Board of Education, 12 J. & S. 53; 14J.& -
S. 565; aff'd 85 N. Y. 117; 1 Civ. Pro. 311; dist. 13
Civ. Pro. 255; applied 62 How. Pr. 476.
Same case, sub nom.,
Donovan v. McAlpin, 24 J. & S. 111; aff’d 85 N. Y. 185.
THEATRES AND GRAND STANDS.
Theatre gallery fell.
Bard v.N. Y. & H.R. R. Co., 10 Daly, 520; Daily Reg.,
Aug. 2, 1882.
Theatre gallery fell.
Edwards v. N. Y. & H. R. R..Co., 25 Hun, 634; 98
N. Y. 245; applied 115 N. Y. 220, and 26 St. Rep.
295; applied 118 N. Y. 116, and 27 St. Rep. 955; ap-
plied 49 Hun, 232, and 17 St. Rep. 36, and 1 Supp.
633, and 28 Week. Dig. 568; dist. 126 N. Y. 525, and
37 St. Rep. 906; dist. 55 Hun, 212, and 27 St. Rep.
806, and 8 Supp. 51; dist. 36 St. Rep. 454, and 12
Supp. 792; followed 117 N. Y. 124, and 26 St. Rep.
919; followed 38 St. Rep. 485, and 14 Supp. 637.
Fall of grand stand at bal! game.
Van Antwerp v. Linton, 89 Hun, 417; 69 St. Rep. 762;
35 Supp. 718.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 36 I
“
THEATRES AND GRAND STANDS.
Heel caught in covering of theatre stairs.
Butcher v. Hyde, 10 Misc. 275; 63 St. Rep. 312; 30
Supp. 1073; rev. 152 N. Y. 142.
Gallery god slipped on soniething and fell into theatre.
Dunning v. Jacobs, 15 Misc. 85; 71 St. Rep. 512; 36
Supp. 453.
Attendant at theatre opened cab door before it stopped and
a post broke it.
Wellman v. Miner, 19 Misc. 644; 78 St. Rep. 4173; 44
Supp. 417.
Defendant leased grand stand and grounds to club for one
day’s racing. Stairway defectively built fell with plaintiff.
Fox v. Buffalo Park, 21 App. Div. 321.
' WATER.
Flooding neighbor — lower floor.
Pipe burst.
Rudolphy v. Fuchs, 5 Alb. L. J. 201; 44 How. Pr. 155.
Overflow from. second floor.
Brown v. Elliott, 45 How. Pr. 182; 4 Daly, 329.
Overflow from upper floor.
Eakin v. Brown, 1 E. D. Smith, 30.
Faucet left open. .
Moore v. Goedel, 7 Bosw. 591; aff'd 34 N. Y. 527; fol-
lowed 24 J. & S. 438, and 21 St. Rep. 470, and 4 Supp.
193.
Leaky pipes.
Terry v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 8 Bosw. 504.
Lower tenant flooded by foul water.
Ham v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 5 J. & S. 458; aff'd
70 N. Y. 459; dist. 105 N. Y. 142, and 6 St. Rep. 847,
and 26 Week. Dig. 78; dist. 7 J. & S. 1; dist. 83 N. Y.
528.
Overflow of water.
Peiser v. Schanning, 13 St. Rep. 63; 14 Daly, 399.
Overflow clogged.
Clarke v. Anderson, 15 St. Rep. 363; 2 City Ct. 115; 14
Daly, 464.
362 PRIVATE PREMISES.
WATER.
Flooding neighbor — lower floor.
Lower tenant agreed to shut off water; did not and was
flooded.
Walker v. Globe Mfg. & Imp. Co., 21 St. Rep. 470; 4
Supp. 193; 24 J. & S. 431.
Upper tenant flooded lower tenant.
Lissa v. Goodkind, 25 J. & S. 60; 25 St. Rep. 353; 5
Supp. 835; aff'd 125 N. Y. 707.
Faucet on upper floor left open.
Denton v. Kernochan, 37 St. Rep. 510; 13 Supp. 889.
Faucet left open. ,
Spencer v. McManus, 5 Misc. 267; 27 Supp. 896; aff'd
82 Hun, 318, and 63 St. Rep. 500, and 31 Supp. 185.
Water basin overflowed.
Curran v. Weiss, 6 Misc. 138; 56 St. Rep. 284;° 26
Supp. 8.
Waste pipe choked up.
Slater v. Adler, 8 Misc. 310; 59 St. Rep. 281; 28 Supp.
720.
Water dripped through ceiling.
Martin v. Coleman, 13 Misc. 779; 67 St. Rep. 876; 34
Supp. 1143; aff'd 70 St. Rep. 714, and 14 Misc. 505,
and 35 Supp. 1069.
Overflow from upper tenant.
Steinweg v. Biel, 16 Misc. 47; 73 St. Rep. 259; 37
Supp. 678.
Leaked from upper floor.
Greco v. Bernheimer, 17 Misc. 592; 75 St. Rep. 81; 40
Supp. 077.
Faucet overflowed.
Simon-Reigel C. Co. v. Gordan-Burnham B. Co., 20
e Misc. 508.
Flooding neighbor — surface water.
Flooded neighbor’s cellar from roof.
Bellows v. Sackett, 15 Barb. 96; dist. and criticised 115
N. Y. 227, and 26 St. Rep. 295.
Gutter and water spout floeded neighbor.
Gilbert v. Beach, 4 Duer, 423; 16 N. Y. 606; dist. 20 N.
Y. 240; explained 1 Robt. 432; 5 Bosw. 445.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 363
WATER.
Flooding neighbor — surface water.
Pipes in next building leaked.
Terry v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 8 Bosw. 504.
Land sloped; shed water on neighbor.’
Thomas v. Kenyon, 1 Daly, 132.
Water not carried off; soaked through ground to neighbor.
Slater v. Mersereau, 5 Daly, 445; aff'd 64 N. Y. 138;
approved and dist. 77 N. Y. 51.
Raised land and did not drain neighbor’s surface water as
formerly.
Vanderwiele v. Taylor, 65 N. Y. 341.
Drain overflowed and flooded cellar of adjoining premises.
Jutte v. Hughes, 8 J. & S. 126; rev. 67 N. Y. 267; fol-
lowed 48 Hun, 227, and 17 St. Rep. 937.
Excavating cellar; collected water and it leaked into next
cellar.
Mairs v. Manhattan R. E. A., 15 J. & S. 31; 89 N. Y.
498; dist. 114 N. Y. 338, and 23 St. Rep. 739.
Embankment cast surface water on neighbor.
Hanse v. Cowing, 1 Lans. 288.
Drains from swamp.
Foot v. Bronson, 4 Lans. 47.
Obstructed neighbor’s surface water and flooded back.
Wagner v. Long Island R. R. Co., 2 Hun, 633; 5 T. &
C. 163; appeal dismissed 70 N. Y. 614; followed 19
Hun, 320.
Raised land and threw surface water on neighbor.
Barkley v. Wilcox, 19 Hun, 320; aff'd 86 N. Y. 140.
Water discharged from leader upon neighbor’s land.
Schwab v. Cleveland, 28 Hun, 458.
Collected surface water in pits in digging embankment aud
flooded neighbor.
Deiglemann v. N. Y., L. E. & W. Ry. Co., 34 St. Rep.
4; 12 Supp. 83. :
Water leaked from next cellar. Sued owner not occupant.
Strauss v. Hamersly, 37 St. Rep. 749; 13 Supp. 816.
Collected surface water and discharged it underground so it
collected on plaintiff’s land.
Vernum v. Wheeler, 35 Hun, 53; 117 N. Y. 650.
'64 PRIVATE PREMISES.
WATER.
‘looding neighbor — surface water.
Embankment ; ditch not kept open.
Mitchell v. N. Y.,L. E.& W.R.R. Co., 36 Hun, 177.
Gutter discharged on neighbor.
Haggerty v. Thompson, 45 Hun, 398; 10 St. Rep. 137.
Pipe across land underground ; leaked into cellar.
Comstock v, N. Y., C. & St. R. R. Co., 48 Hun, 225;
17 St. Rep. 937.
Insufficient drain.
Schrieber v. Driving Club of N. Y., 15 Misc. 632; 72
St. Rep. 701 ; 37 Supp. 348; rev. 17 Misc. 131, and 39
Supp. 348.
Broke pipe in excavating and flooded cellar.
Stallman v. N. Y. Steam Co., 17 App. Div. 397; 79 St.
Rep. 161; 45 Supp. 161.
urface water intercepted.
Draining land; intercepted underground source of neighbor’s
spring.
Ellis v. Duncan, 21 Barb. 230; 29 N. Y. 466.
Diverted surface water by ditch.
Curtiss v. Ayrault, 47 N. Y. 73; 3 Hun, 487;5 T. & C.
611; dist. 107 N. Y. 396, and 12 St. Rep. 30, and 27
Week. Dig. 474.
Cut off flow of surface water.
Watson v. City of Kingston, 43 Hun, 367; 4 St. Rep.
779; 26 Week. Dig. 95; aff'd 22 St. Rep. 679, and 114
N.Y. 88.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Broke down vault in building sewer.
Delmonico v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 1 Sandf. 222.
Diseased horses in hospital. Communicated with horses in
next shed.
Mill v. N. Y. & H.R. R. Co., 2 Robt. 326; 41 N. Y.
610.
Excavations in street injured property. Contractor liable.
Burns v. Dillon, 25 Hun, 119; 12 Week. Dig. 473; 16
Week. Dig. 368.
PRIVATE PREMISES. 365
UNCLASSIFIED.
Gutter of one house defective; injured next house.
Kastor v. Newhouse, 4 E. D. Smith, 20.
Landslide from defective embankment near line.
Van Rensselaer v. Albany & N.S. R. R. Co., 1 Hun,
507;3 T. & C. 620; aff'd 62 N. Y. 65.
Sand pile blew into house
Dunsbach v. Hollister, 4g Hun, 352; 17 St. Rep. 461;
2 Supp. 94; aff'd 44 St. Rep. 934, and 132 N. Y. 602.
Debris washed down from R. R. bank upon next land.
Miller v. N. Y., L. E.& W. R. R. Co., 20 St. Rep. 157;
3 Supp. 245; 46 St. Rep. 678; rev. 34 St. Rep. 607,
and 125 N. Y. 118.
‘Customer tripped over truck.
Hart v. Grennell, 16 St. Rep. 746; 33 St. Rep. 553; 122
N. Y. 371.
Infant playing in sand pit; it caved in.
Newdoll v. Young, 80 Hun, 364; 61 St. Rep. 824; 30
Supp. 84.
Defendant sold sand to plaintiff; sand bank caved in while
shoveling it.
Carr v. Sheehan, 81 Hun, 291 ; 62 St. Rep. 736; 30 Supp.
753- ‘
‘Tree blown on house.
Gibson v. Denton, 4 App. Div. 198; 74 St. Rep. 197; 38
Supp. 554.
Injury to gas pipes.
Glens Falls G. L. Co. v. Van Vranken, 11 App. Div.
420; 76 St. Rep. 339; 42 Supp. 339.
PROFESSIONAL MEN.
ARCHITECTS.
Material inferior.
Gilman v. Stevens, 54 How. Pr. 197.
Ignorance of rules as to use of iron.
Kellum v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 5 Week. Dig. 17.
366 PROFESSIONAL MEN.
ARCHITECTS.
Defective plans.
Hubert v. Aitkin, 15 Daly, 237; 19 St. Rep. 914; 2
Supp. 711; aff'd on reargument 5 Supp. 839; aff'd 123
N. Y. 655.
Defective plans.
Lake v. McElfatrick, 46 St. Rep. 437; 19 Supp. 494; 54
St. Rep. 610; 139 N. Y. 349.
=
ATTORNEYS.
Did not collect note.
Smedes v. Elmendorf, 3 Johns. 185.
Counterclaim of neglect.
Whitelegge v. De Witt, 12 Daly, 319.
Erroneous advice.
Estate of A. B., 1 Tuck. 247.
Costs.
Hopping v. Quin, 12 Wend. 517; followed 10 Hun, 236.
Management of cases.
Gleason v. Clark, g Cow. 57; 1 Wend. 393; overruled 22
Wend. 641.
Counterclaim of neglect.
Ayrault v. Chamberlain, 26 Barb. 83; 33 Barb. 229.
Counterclaim of neglect.
Bowman v. Tallman, 27 How. Pr. 212; 2 Robt. 385;
aff'd 3 Abb. C. A. D. 182, n., and 40 How. Pr. 1; 2
Robt. 632; 3 Robt. 633; applied 5 Daly, 318.
Defective contract.
Acer v. Westcott, 1 Lans. 193; rev. 46 N. Y. 384.
Foreclosure.
Raynor v. Selmes, 7 Lans. 440; rev. 52 N. Y. 579; ap-
plied 6 Hun, 513
Did not file lis pendens.
Jaquiss v. Hagner, 72 N. Y. 605.
Counterclaim of neglect.
Stewart v. Morss, 79 N. Y. 629.
Improper investment.
Whitney v. Martine, 6 Abb. N. C. 72; rev. 15 J. & S.
396, and that rev. 88 N. Y. 535; approved 109'N. Y.
221, and 14 St. Rep. 838.
PROFESSIONAL MEN. 367
ATTORNEYS.
Malpractice.
Von Wallhoffen v. Newcombe, 10 Hun, 236.
Death during pendency of action.
Seymour v. Cagger, 13 Hun, 29.
Malpractice.
Carter v. Tallcott, 36 Hun, 393.
Did not appeal.
Cole v. Roby, 40 St. Rep. 899; 16 Supp. 20.
No affidavit of incumbrances before executing contract.
Livingston v. Spero, 18 Misc. 243; 75 St. Rep. 999; 41
Supp. 606; 18 Misc. 252; 75 St. Rep. 1494; 41 Supp.
1121.
Title.
Byrnes v. Palmer, 18 App. Div. 1; 79 St. Rep. 479; 45
Supp. 479. .
Mortgage not a first lien.
Fay v. McGuire, 2c App. Div. 569.
DRUGGISTS.
Wrong label.
Thomas v. Winchcster, 6 N. Y. 396; dist. 132 N. Y. 93,
and 43 St. Rep. 386; dist. 11 Abb. Pr. 131; dist. 24
Barb. 361; dist. 26 Barb. 627; dist. 11 Hun, 357; dist.
42 N. Y. 351; dist. 57 N. Y. 494; applied 64 Barb.
213; applied 2 Bosw. 648; applied 1 Hilt. 445; applied
36 N. Y. 206; applied 19 N. Y. 130.
Morphine instead of quinine.
Quin v. Moore, 15 N. Y. 432.
Used strychnine instead of camphor.
Minner v. Scherfuch, 5 St. Rep. 851.
Sold poison without label.
Wohlfahrt v. Beckert, 27 Hun, 74; 12 Abb. N. C. 478;
92 N. Y. 490; dist. 109 N. Y. 649, and 15 St. Rep.
317, and 2 Silv. 55. and 28 Week. Dig. 539.
Mistake of clerk.
Beckwith v. Oatman, 43 Hun, 265; 5 St. Rep. 445; 26
Week. Dig. 189; approved 132 N. Y. 94, and 43 St.
Rep. 386.
Prescription.
Cohn v. Jarecky, 90 Hun, 266; 70 St. Rep. 601 ; 35 Supp.
935-
368
PROFESSIONAL MEN.
DRUGGISTS.
Application for license.
Matter of Ward, 10 Misc. 424; 63 St. Rep. 342; 31 Supp.
49.
Morphine instead of quinine.
Mundt v. Glokner, 20 Misc. 63; 78 St. Rep. 430; 44
Supp. 430; 3 Ann. Cas. 383.
PHYSICIANS.
Treatment of wife.
Lynch v. Davis, 12 How. Pr. 323; explained and criti-
cised 2 Abb. C. A. D. 280.
Physicians’ certificate as tc sickness of opera vocalist.
Corsi v. Maretzek, 4 E. D. Smith, 1.
Judgment for services a bar to action for malpractice.
Gates v. Preston, 41 N. Y. 113; applied 58 Hun, 556,
. and 35 St. Rep. 772, and 12 Supp. 903; applied 77
N. Y. 80; dist. 83 N. Y. 192; re-aff’d 75 N. Y. 152.
Two visits in a miscarriage case and did not return.
Becker v. Janinski, 15 Supp. 675; 27 Abb. N. C. 45.
Improper treatment of eyes.
Baird v. Gillett, 47 N. Y. 186; followed 11 J. & S. 522.
Removal to small-pox hospital.
Brown v. Purdy, 8 St. Rep. 143; 22 J. & S. 109.
Counterclaim of malpractice.
Blair v. Bartlett, 75 N. Y. 150; dist. 83 N. Y. 192.
Removal of tumor.
Wells v. World’s Dispensary M. A., 9 St. Rep. 452; 27
Week. Dig. 73; aff'd 30 St. Rep. go9, and 2 Silv. 575,
and 120 N. Y. 630.
Kept bandage on and lost sight of eye.
Van Tassell v. Manhattan E. & E. Hospital, 39 St. Rep.
781; 15 Supp. 620.
Treatment. Evidence oi reputation.
Degnan v. Ransom, 83 Hun, 267; 64 St. Rep. 788; 31
Supp. 966.
Piece of steel in leg; physician and surgeon.
Lorenz v. Jackson, 88 Hun, 200; 68 St. Rep. 615; 34
Supp. 652.
Registered license in wrong place.
Mayor, etc. of N. Y. v. Bigelow, 13 Misc. 42; 68 St.
Rep. 163; 34 Supp. g2.
PROFESSIONAL MEN. 369
SURGEONS.
Broken leg.
Bellinger v. Craigue, 31 Barb. 534; dist. 83 N. Y. 192;
approved 41 N. Y. 113.
Dislocated elbow joint.
Carpenter v. Blake, 60 Barb. 485;-rev. 50 N. Y. 696;
applied 43 Hun, 267, and 5 St. Rep. 445, and 26 Week.
Dig. 189; 10 Hun, 358; aff'd 75 N. Y. 12; applied
130 N. Y. 331, and 41 St. Rep. 638; 2 Lans. 206; dist.
77 N. Y. 178.
Poison in eye.
Doyle v. N. Y. Eye and Ear Infirmary, 80 N. Y. 631.
Swelling near hip; punctured joint.
Walsh v. Sayre, 52 How. Pr. 334; disapproved 42 St.
Rep. 673, and 16 Supp. 916; approved 60 How. Pr.
144; criticised 21 Hun, 268; disapproved 18 J. & S
412.
Fracture of elbow; hand deformed.
Boldt v. Murray, 2 St. Rep. 232; 23 St. Rep. 994.
Amputation of leg.
Du Bois v. Decker, 22 St. Rep. 274; 4 Supp. 768; aff’d
41 St. Rep. 638, and 130 N. Y. 325.
Fractured leg.
Smith v. Dumont, 25 St. Rep. 382; 6 Supp. 242.
Operation for sterility.
Graves v. Santway, 25 St. Rep. 1022; 6 Supp. 892; 2
Silv. 67; aff'd 127 N. Y. 677.
Setting bone.
Barton v. Govan, 4 St. Rep. 876; aff'd 26 St. Rep. 847,
and 2 Silv. 417, and 116 N. Y. 658.
Broken arm.
Link v. Sheldon 45 St. Rep. 165; 18 Supp. 815; aff’d
48 St. Rep. 820, and 136 N. Y. 1.
Fracture of bone.
Burrell v. Preston, 54 Hun, 70; 26 St. Rep. aes 7 Supp.
177.
Reducing fracture.
Winner v. Lathrop, 67 Hun, 511; 51 St. Rep. 258; 22
Supp. 516.
Fractured arm not discovered.
Gadney v. Kingsley, 41 St. Rep. 794.
[24]
370 PROFESSIONAL MEN.
SURGEONS.
Dislocated shoulder.
Rowe v. Lent, 42 St. Rep. 483; 17 Supp. 131.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Dentist.
Keily v. Colton, 1 City Ct. 439.
Invalid leaped from window.
Harris v. Woman’s Hospital, 39 St. Rep. 98; 14 Supp.
881; 27 Abb. N.C. 37.
Notary did not protest note.
Franklin v. Smith, 21 Wend. 624.
Notary did not protest bill.
Commercial Bank y. Varnum, 3 Lans. 86; rev. 49 N. Y.
269; 7 Hun, 236.
Optician.
Price v. Ga Nun, 11 Misc. 74; 66 St. Rep. 184; 32 Supp.
8o1.
Patient burned by bottles.
Joel v. Woman's Hospital, 89 Hun, 73; 69 St. Rep. 4303.
35 Supp. 37; 2 Ann. Cas. 264.
Tax searcher.
Morange v. Mix, 44: N. Y. 315.
Veterinary surgeon.
Boom v. Reed, 69 Hun, 426; 52 St. Rep. 777; 23 Supp.
421.
Judge and physicians negligently committed person as insane.
_ Ayers v. Russell, 50 Hun, 282; 20 St. Rep. 323; 3 Supp.
338.
RAILROADS—STEAM.
e ANIMALS INJURED ON TRACK.
Length of fence down; horse broke legs on bridge. ;
Knight v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 30 Hun, 453.
99 N. Y. 25; dist. 75 Hun, 530, and 57 St. Rep. 655,
and 27 Supp. 498; dist. 46 Hun, 388, and 12 St. Rep.
390, and 27 Week. Dig. 526.
No cattle guards at end of bridge: horse fell off.
Ham v. Newburgh, D. & C. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 137.
KALLKROADS —— SILEAM. jf
ANIMALS INJURED ON TRACK.
Track in cut; no fence on top; horse fell down.
Graham v. D. & H. C. Co., 46 Hun, 386; 12 St. Rep.
390; 27 Week. Dig. 526; dist. 46 Hun, 413, and 12
St. Rep. 399, and 27 Week. Dig. 484; followed 12 St.
Rep. 415.
Colt in pasture; river not fordable; colt went down to ford,
crossed, returned and was found dead at bridge.
Hyatt v. N. Y.,L. E.& W.R.R. Co., 64 Hun, 542; 46
St. Rep. 7; 19 Supp. 461.
No fence; cattle fell through bridge at side of track.
French v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 72 Hun, 469;
54 St. Rep. 762; 25 Supp. 229.
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
At crossings.
Cows loose in highway.
Clark v. Syracuse & U. R. R. Co., 11 Barb. 112.
Cow unattended in street.
Bowman v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 37 Barb. 516; dist. 1
Hun, 378; dist. 3 T. & C. 538.
Cows.turned into highway without attendant.
Fitch v. Buffalo & N. Y. R.’R. Co., 13 Hun, 668.
Cattle; no fence nor gates.
Martin v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Ce, 20 Misc. 363; 79
St. Rep. 925; 45 Supp. 925.
Cows being driven across a track on a curve. ;
Card v. N. Y, & H. R. R. Co., 50 Barb. 30.
On track — bars down or gates open.
‘Gate open.
Brooks v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 13 Barb. 594.
Gate open.
Byrnes v. D. & H.C. Co., 7 Week. Dig. 549.
Gate out of repair.
Staats v. H. R. R. R. Co., 39 Barb. 298; 23 How. Pr.
463; 3 Keyes, 196; 4 Abb. C. A. D. 287; 33 How. Pr.
‘130.
Gate out of repair.
Murray v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 3 Abb. C. A. D. 339; 4
Keyes, 274; dist. 44 St. Rep. 349, and 18 Supp. 3 cee
Farm gate open.
Spinner v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 2 Hun, 421; 4
372 RAILROADS — STEAM.
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
On track — bars down and gates open.
T. & C. 595; 6 Hun, 600; aff'd 67 N. Y. 153; dist. 28
St. Rep. 96, and 8 Supp. 868.
Bars down.
Chapman v. N. Y. C. & H, R. BR R. Co, 37 Barb..
399; aff'd 33 N. Y. 369.
Bars down.
Hungerford v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 46 Hun,
339; 12 St. Rep. 204; 19 St. Rep. 47; 4 Supp. 643;
aff'd 127 N. Y. 647.
Gate open.
Diamond Brick Co. v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 55
Hun, 605; 28 St. Rep. 95; 7 Supp. 868; 58 Hun, 396;
34 St. Rep. €37; 12 Supp. 22.
Gate open.
Magilton v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 82 Hun, 308;
63 St. Rep. 571; 31 Supp. 241; 11 App. Div. 373; 76
St. Rep. 231; 42 Supp. 231.
Gate open.
Simmons v. Poughkeepsie & E. Ry. Co., 2 App. Div.
117; 73 St. Rep. 148; 37 Supp. 532.
Bars down. ,
Connolly v. Central Vt. R. R. Co., 4 App. Div. 221; 74
St. Rep. 214; 38 Supp. 587.
On track — cattle guards.
Horse at large; railroad not required to have cattle guards in
New York City streets.
Halloran v. N.Y. & H.R. R. Co., 2 E. D. Smith, 257.
Cow et large in highway.
Suydam v. Moore, 8 Barb. 358.
Horse stfuck either at highway or on track.
Waldron v. Rensselaer & S. R. R. Co., 8 Barb. 390.
Hog killed on bridge; no cattle guards at end of. bridge.
Vanderkar v. Rensselaer & S. R. R. Co., 13 Barb. 390;
approved 27 N. Y. 269; applied 86 N. Y. 38.
(Cow on track.
Talmadge v. Rensselaer & S. R. R. Co., 13 Barb. 493.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 373
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
On track — cattle guards.
Runnning on track of ancther company.
Parker v. Rensselaer & S. R. R. Co., 16 Barb. 315; ex-
plained 27 N. Y. 269; questioned 57 Barb. 580.
Contract to maintain fences, but no gates on cattle guards.
Poler v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 16 N. Y. 476.
Cattle guard filled up with snow.
Hance v. Cayuga & S. R. R. Co., 26 N. Y. 428.
No cattle guard at side of track where R. R. was in highway
and another highway crossed it.
Brace v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 27 N. Y. 269.
No cattle guard at crossing near station.
Bradley v. Buffalo, N. Y. & E. R. R. Co., 34 N. Y. 427;
followed 5 Hun, 344.
Horses escaped from pasture to highway; defective cattle
guard.
_ Sheaf v. Utica & B. R. R. R. Co. 2 T. & C. 388.
Cattle at large in highway.
Rhodes v. Utica, I. & E. R. Co., 5 Hun, 344.
Improper cattle guard.
Swarthout v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 7 Hun, 571.
Cow at large; frightened; about to jump cattle guard when
struck.
White v. Utica & B. R. R. R. Co., 12 Week. Dig. 72;
15 Hun, 333.
Had been a cattle guard five years before. Road used for 30
years, but had not been made a highway.
Simpson y. N. Y., L. E. & W..R. R. Co., 14 Week. Dig.
380.
No cattle guards or fence.
Lackin v. D. & H. C. Co., 22 Hun, 3009.
On track — fences.
Horse fell into cut in Fourth Ave.
Mentges v. Harlem R. R. Co., 1 Hilt. 425.
Defective fence in adjoining pasture.
Duffy v. N. Y. R. R. Co., 2 Hilt. 496.
Horses escaped from barn yard.
Gunnison v. N. Y. & Canada R. R. Co., 8 Week. Dig.
357:
74 RAILROADS — STEAM.
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
n track — fences.
Broken down fence.
Lane v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 23 Week. Dig.
267.
Fence out of repair.
Draper v. Rochester & P. R: R. Co., 24 Week. Dig. 97.
Ran over leased roadway.
Shanchan v. N. Y. & N. H. R. R. Co., 10 Abb. Pr. 398.
Similar facts.
Labussiere v. N. Y. & N. H. R. R. Co., 10 Abb. Pr.
398, n.
Question of title of lands taken by R. R.
Tonawanda R. R. Co. v. Munger, 5 Den. 255; approved
4 N. Y. 349; dist. 7 Barb. 303; dist. 25 Barb. 12; ap-
plied 22 Barb. 583; applied 37 Barb. 518; applied 38
How. Pr. 325; applied 11 Barb. 114.
Same case sub nom.,
Munger v. Tonawanda R. R. Co., 4 N. Y. 349; applied
1 Hilt. 426; applied 26 N. Y. 432; applied 2 Abb. C.
A. D. 381; explained and approved 57 N. Y. 396; ap-
plied 3 E. D. Smith, 373; commented on 39 How. Pr.
415; explained 1 Duer, 581.
Plaintiff not an adjoining owner; no fence nor cattle guards.
Corwin v. N. Y. & E. R. R. Co., 13 N. Y. 42; criticised
23 J. & S. 506, and 16 St. Rep. 579, and 3 Supp. 820,
and 28 Week. Dig. 407; applied 4 Abb. C. A. D. 292;
applied 4 Abb. C A. D. 352; applied 37 Barb. 198;
applied 2 Hilt. 498; applied 1 Hun, 380; applied 18
Hun, 109; applied 27 N. Y. 275; applied 61 N. Y.
355; dist. 27 Barb. 228; dist. 37 Barb. 518; dist. 2
T. & C. 388; applied 29 Barb. 649; followed 5 Hun,
844; followed 35 N. Y. 645.
Cow pastured in highway.
Marsh v. N. Y. & E. R. R..Co., 14 Barb. 364; disap-
proved 13 N.Y. 42.
Cow got on track from plaintiff’s lane; fences and cattle guards
in order.
Tombs v. Rochester & S. R. R. Co., 18 Barb. 583.
Sparks from locomotive had burned fence of adjoining pasture.
Terry v. N. ¥.C.& H.R. R.R. Co,, 22 Barb. 574.
+
DOLLY We assis JI
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
On track — fences.
Colt strayed to highway ; then to field of third person adjoining
railroad; fence of this field defective.
Munch v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 29 Barb. 647.
Defective fence; some places none.
Tallman v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 4 Abb.
C. A. D. 351; 4 Keyes, 128.
Insufficient fence.
Morrison v. N. Y. & N. H. R. R. Co., 32 Barb. 568;
dist. 55 Hun, 118, and 28 St. Rep. 72, and 8 Supp.
187.
Agreement of plaintiff’s assignor to build fences.
Shepherd v. Buffalo, N. Y. & E. R. R. Co., 35 N. Y.
641.
Cattle strayed to farm where fence was temporarily down.
McDowell v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 37 Barb. 195.
No fence where R. R. was built in water.
Schermerhorn v. H. R. R. R. Co., 38 N. Y. 103; ex-
plained 62 Hun, 295, and 42 St. Rep. 200, and 17
Supp. 120. .
Running on track of another company.
Tracy v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 55 Barb. 529; aff’d 38
N. Y. 433; approved 57 Barb. 589.
No cattle guards nor fences.
Burchfield v. Northern C. R. R. Co., 57 Barb. 589.
Defendant was a foreign corporation.
Purdy v. N. Y. & IN. H. R. R. Co., 61 N. Y. 353.
Defective fence.
.Thompson v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co, 1 T. & C. 411; 3
Sandf. Ch. 625.
No fence at farm crossing.
Fanning v. Long Island R. R. Co., 2 T. & C. 585.
Defective part of fence known to defendant.
Wheeler v. Erie Ry. Co., 2 T. & C. 634; see 13 N. Y.
42; dist. 44 St. Rep. 349, and 18 Supp. 313.
Fences necessarily down to repair tracks.
Brady v. Rensselaer & S. R. R. Co., 1 Hun, 378; 3 T. &
C. 537.
No fence nor cattle guards.
Crawford v.N. Y.C & H.R. R.R. Co., 18 Hun, 108.
376 RAILROADS — STEAM.
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
On track — fences.
No notice of defects.
Hodge v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 27 Hun, 394.
Fence removed by third person some hours before accident.
Boyle v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R. R. Co., 39 Hun, 171;
aff'd 23 St. Rep. 721, and 115 N. Y. 636, and 2 Silv.
3206.
Statute also to protect persons on trains.
Donnegan v. Erhardt, 16 St. Rep. 579; 23 J. & S. 502;
3 Supp. 820; 28 Week. Dig. 407; rev. 29 St. Rep. 589,
and 119 N. Y. 468.
Open space between station grounds and hotel; horse escaped
from shed.
Dixon v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 22 St. Rep. 61;
4 Supp. 296.
No fence opposite grist mill.
Dolan v. Newburgh, D. & C.R. R. Co., 31 St. Rep. 852;
120 N. Y. 571; dist. 126 N. Y. 369, and 37 St. Rep.
485 ; explained 62 Hun, 295, and 42 St. Rep. 200, and |
17 Supp. 120; harmonized 35 St. Rep. 674, and 12
Supp. 723.
Defective fence.
Becker v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.R. Co., 31 St. Rep. 750;
10 Supp. 413.
Central of five lines of R. R. No fence on side of outside road.
Kelver v. N. Y., Chicago & St. L. R. R. Co., 35 St. Rep.
673; 12 Supp. 723; aff'd 37 St. Rep. 485, and 126 N.
Y. 365; followed 62 Hun, 294, and 42 St. Rep. 200,
and 17 Supp. 120.
Defective fence at culvert.
Downs v. Central Vermont R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 228;
f% Supp. 573.
Horse broke through inadequate fence.
Archibald v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep.
790; 14 Supp. Sor.
Colt went through barbed wire fence which was out of repair.
Hathaway v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 49 St. Rep. 466; 20
Supp. 917.
KAILRUADS — STEAM. 377
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
On track — fences.
Fence broken down to 2 feet 8 inches.
Leyden v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 55 Hun, 114; 28
St. Rep. 72; 8 Supp. 187.
Lot leased to plaintiff not fenced.
Potter v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 60 Hun, 313; 38
St. Rep. 798; 15 Supp. 12; dist. 62 Hun, 297, and 42
St. Rep. 200, and 17 Supp. 120.
River at side of track.
Klock v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 62 Hun, 291; 42
St. Rep. 200; 17 Supp. 120.
Plaintiff not adjoining owner.
Dayton v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 81 Hun, 284;
62 St. Rep. 747; 30 Supp. 783.
Defendant had leased all its property.
Throne v. Lehigh V. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 141; 68 St.
Rep. 308; 34 Supp. 525.
Defendant running over leased road.
Edwards v. Buffalo, R. & P. Ry. Co., 8 App. Div. 3903
75 St. Rep. 164; 40 Supp. 788.
Wire fence with single strand.
Green v. Hornellsville & C. Ry. Co., 24 App. Div. 434.
CROSSING DEFECTIVE.
Animals.
Horse.
‘France v. Erie R. R. Co., 2 Hun, 513; 5 T. & C. 12.
Horse caught hoof.
Payne v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 9 Hun, 526; applied 24
Hun, 37; followed 13 Week. Dig. 108; approved 108
N. Y. 156, and 13 St. Rep. 105, and 27 Week. Dig.
554; dist. 62 Hun, 173, and 41 St. Rep. 804, and 16
Supp. 640; dist. 2 City Ct. 361; 83 N. Y. 572.
Horse caught hoof.
Cuddleback v. Jewett, 20 Hun, 187.
Horse caught hoof; hit by train.
Cornell v. Skaneateles R. R. Co., 15 Supp. 581; 40 St.
Rep. 1.
78 RAILROADS — STEAM.
CROSSING DEFECTIVE.
edestrians.
Infant caught foot; run over.
Pakalinsky v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 18 Week.
Dig. 44; 82 N. Y. 424; 96 N. Y. 639.
Foot between guard rail and rail.
McKinney v. Long Island R. R. Co., 25 St. Rep. 685;
6 Supp. 168; 2 Silv. S. C. 543; aff'd 119 N. Y. 631.
Caught foot between guard rail and rail. Saw train coming
and turned to warn boys.
McPhillips v. N. Y.. N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 12 Daly,
365; 37 St. Rep. 263; 13 Supp. 917; re-argument de-
nied 39 St. Rep. 50, and 14 Supp. 928.
Infant; foot in unblocked frog. Run over.
Friess v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 67 Hun, 205; 51
St. Rep. 391 ; 22 Supp. 104; aff’d 55 St. Rep. 931.
ehicles.
Rail upset wagon.
Gale v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 53 How. Pr. 385;
aff'd 13 Hun, 1, and that aff’d 76 N. Y. 594.
Hole; jolted from wagon.
Masterson v. N. ¥.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 84 N. Y. 247;
followed 13 Week. Dig. 395; dist. 109 N. Y. 22, and
14 St. Rep. 29, and 28 Week. Dig. 250.
Wagon upset.
Rembe v. N. Y.,O. & W. R. R. Co., 102 N. Y. 72131
Silv. 154.
Plank removed ; thrown from sleigh.
Currier v. Ogdensburg & L. C. R. R. Co., 25 St. Rep.
87; 6 Supp. 615; 2 Silv. S. C. 12; aff’d 127 N. Y. 653.
Wheel in hole.
Hoyt v.N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 6 St. Rep. 7; rev.
29 St. Rep. 48, and 118 N. Y. 390.
Plank removed; sleigh upset.
Lowell v. Central Vt. R. R. Co., 15 App. Div. 218; 78
St. Rep. 193; 44 Supp. 193.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 379
HIT BY GATES.
Gate lowered on pedestrian.
Feeney v. Long Island R. R. Co., 5 St. Rep. 63; aff'd
26 St. Rep. 729, and 116 N. Y. 375.
Gate lowered on man on wagon.
Mosher v. Russell, 44 Hun, 12; 6 Ene Rep. 407; 26
Week. Dig. 234.
Gate allowed to fall on horse.
F. Leopold v. D. & H. C. Co., 66 Hun, 628; 49 St. Rep.
459; 21 Supp. 100.
Same accident.
C. Leopold v. D. & H.C. Co., 74 Hun, 137; 56 St. Rep.
889; 26 Supp. 1123.
Gate came down on horse.
Sarah Phillips v. N. ¥.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 25 St. Rep.
gt; 6 Supp. 621; aff’d 38 St. Rep. 675, and 3 Silv. 467,
and 127 N. Y. 657.
FARM AND PRIVATE CROSSINGS
Defective.
Defendant took up planks and left deep holes.
Smith v. N. Y. & Oswego M. R. R. Co., 63 N. Y. 58;
applied 81 N. Y. 190.
Horse on spike of defective crossing.
Prince v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 793;
14 Supp. 817.
Horse caught hoof between rail and plank, and run over.
Cotton v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 48 St. Rep. 89;
20 Supp. 347.
Run overs — driving.
Clear view for 14 rods.
Spencer v. Utica & S. R. R. Co., 5 Barb. 337; denied
6 Duer, 633.
Question of usual place for teams.
Smith v. Erie Ry. Co., 1 Alb. L. J. 237.
Could only see 70 feet ; did not look.
Cranston v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 39 Hun, 308;
rev. 4 St. Rep. 300, and 25 Week. Dig. 194, and 103
N. Y. 614; declared overruled 6 St. Rep. 332, and 26
Week. Dig. 239; dist. 131 N. Y. 593, and 42 St. Rep.
.
380 RAILROADS — STEAM.
FARM AND PRIVATE CROSSINGS.
Run overs — driving.
868; dist. 19 St. Rep. 333, and 2 Supp. 828; 32 St-
Rep. 592; 11 Supp. 215; aff'd 125 N. Y. 724.
Girl of 3 years. Question of damages.
Houghkirk v. D. & H. C. Co., 28 Hun, 407; 63 How.
Pr. 328; 11 Abb. N. C. 72; 92 N. Y. 219; dist. 29 St-
Rep. 635, and 9 Supp. 153; harmonized 16 St. Rep.
458, and 1 Supp. 286, and 28 Week. Dig. 472.
Clear view.
Nash v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 5315
15 St. Rep. 879; 1 Supp. 269; 28 Week. Dig. 572;
aff'd 117 N. Y. 628; 51 Hun, 594; 22 St. Rep. 106;
4 Supp. 525; rev. 34 St. Rep. 788, and 3 Silv. 315, and
125 N. Y. 715; followed 44 St. Rep. 60, and 17 Supp.
400.
Road in cut; brush.
Vandewater v. N. Y. & N. E. R. R. Co., 63 Hun, 186;
43 St. Rep. 420; 17 Supp. 652; rev. 49 St. Rep. 55,
and 135 N. Y. 583; 74 Hun, 32; 56 St. Rep. 208; 26
Supp. 397.
Run overs — pedestrians.
Adult on foot. Trees.
Cordell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 6 Hun, 461;
rev. 64 N. Y. 535; dist. 133 N. Y. 532, and 44 St. Rep.
317; followed 94 N. Y. 12; 70 N. Y. 119; 75 N. Y.~
330; dist. 13 Daly. 217; followed 113 N. Y. 385, and.
22 St. Rep. 666; followed 125 N. Y. 411, and 35 St.
Rep. 435; explained and followed 22 Hun, 78; fol--
lowed 13 Week. Dig. 61; explained 23 Hun, 75; 79
N. Y. 636.
Adult on fot.
Larkin v. N. Y. & Northern R. R. Co., 46 St. Rep. 658;
19 Supp. 479; 51 St. Rep..935; 138 N. Y. 634.
Trying to save cows; clear view.
Morris v. L.S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 79 Hun, 611; 148 N. Y.
182; 24 Week. Dig. 160.
Infant or foot
Burk v. D. & H. C. Co., 86 Hun, 519; 67 St. Rep. 667;
22 Supp. 986.
KAILKUADS — STEAM. 301
\
FARM AND PRIVATE CROSSINGS.
Run overs — pedestrians.
Adult on foot; clear view.
Berzevizy v. D., L. & W.R.R. Co., 19 App. Div. 309
Run overs — unclassified.
Train just passed ; kicked car.
Sutton v. N.Y. C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 4 Hun, 760; rev.
66 N. Y. 243; applied 111 N. Y. 329, and. 19 St. Rep.
355; dist. 104 N. Y. 366, and 5 St. Rep. 722, and 25
Week. Dig. 514; dist. 44 St. Rep. 342, and 18 Supp.
284; explained 44 Hun, 246, and 10 St. Rep. 156, and
26 Week. Dig. 494; dist. 70 N. Y. 119.
Girl of 15; train just passed.
Swift v. Staten Island R. T. Co., 24 St. Rep. 3593 5
Supp. 316; 1 Silv. 375; aff'd 33 St. Rep. 604, and 3
Silv. 184, and 123 N. Y. 645; followed 44 St. Rep.
747, and 17 Supp. 654; 48 St. Rep. 931; 135 N. Y. 650.
FIRES.
Dropped coal.
Field v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 29 Barb. 176; followed 22
N. Y. 352; aff'd 32 N. Y. 339; applied 115 N. Y. 583,
and 26 St. Rep. 269; applied 13 Daly, 13; dist. 42 St.
Rep. 688, and 17 Supp. 378; followed 5 Hun, 77; fol-
lowed 66 Barb. 338.
Whitbeck v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 36 Barb. 644; dist. 82
N. Y. 308; approved 66 Barb. 85.
.Brown y. Corbin, 24 Week. Dig. 127.
Webb v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 3 Lans. 453; followed
66 Barb. 338; aft’d 49 N. Y. 420; applied 33 St. Rep.
571, and 11 Supp. 308; dist. 118 N. Y. 229, and 28 St.
Rep. 867; followed 45 Hun, 458, and 10 St. Rep. 147;
followed 53 Hun, 524, and 24 St. Rep. 778, and 6
Supp. 850; followed 17 St. Rep. 310, and 1 Supp. 691;
approved 6 Hun, 320.
Bradshaw v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 17 St. Rep. 307;
1 Supp. 691. 4
Coolidge v. R.. W. & O. R. R. Co., 23 St. Rep. 459; 5
Supp. 301; 1 Sil. S. C. 214.
Miller v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 92 Hun, 282; 71
St. Rep. 729; 36 Supp. 719.
382
Sparks.
RAILROADS — STEAM.
FIRES.
Sheldon v. H. R. R. R. Co., 14. N. Y. 218; followed 25
N. Y. 546; followed 32 N. Y. 339; followed 5 Hun,
76; applied 11 Hun, 217; 29 Barb. 226.
Fero v. Buffalo & S. L. R. R: Co., 22 N. Y. 209.
Hinchy v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 17 J. & S. 406.
Rood v. N. Y. & Erie R. R. Co., 18 Barb. 80; explained
22 N. Y. 209, 212; applied 15 Hun, 68; dist. 6 Lans.
132; doubted 29 Barb. 17; followed 6 Hun, 320.
Ryan v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 35 N. Y. 210; criticised 62
Hun, 184, and ar St. Rep. 217, and 16 Supp. 499;
dist. 115 N. Y. 585, and 26 St. Rep. 269; dist. 53 Hun,
523, and 24 St. Rep. 778, and 6 Supp. 850; dist. 23 J.
& S. 396, and 14 St. Rep. 713; dist. 27 St. Rep. 77,
and 7 Supp. 636; doubted 29 St. Rep. 633, and g
Supp. 153; followed 118 N. Y. 229, and 28 St. Rep.
867.
Bedell v. Long Island R. R. Co., 44 N. Y. 367.
Crist v. Erie Ry. Co., 1 T. & C. 435; aff'd 58 N. Y. 638;
applied 33 St. Rep. 571, and 11 Supp. 308.
Case v. Northern Cent. R. R. Co., 59 Barb. 644; doubted
13 Daly, 15.
Miller v. Long Island R. R. Co., 9 Hun, 194; rev. 71
N. Y. 380.
Westiall v. Erie Ry. Co., 5 Hun, 75.
McCaig v. Erie Ry. Co., 8 Hun, 599; criticised 13 Daly,
14.
Home Ins. Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 11 Hun, 182.
Bevier v. D. & H. C. Co., 13 Hun, 254.
Hogle v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 28 Hun, 363; 12
St. Rep. 415; 16 Week. Dig. g.
Kalbfleisch v. Long Island R. R. Co., 102 N. Y. 520.
S. Seeley v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 15 Week. Dig.
231; 2 St. Rep. 452; 1 Sil. 76; aff'd 102 N. Y. 7109.
Ruppel v. Manhattan R. R. Co., 13 Daly, 11; 21 Week.
Dig. 140; dist. 114 N. Y. 469, and 23 St. Rep. 859.
Shepp v. N. Y.C. & H. RR. R. Co., 21 St. Rep. 568;
4 Supp. 951; dist. 42 St. Rep. 688, and 17 Supp. 378.
Douglass v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., § Supp. 214; 23
St. Rep. 456; 1 Sil. S. C. 210.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 303,
FIRES.
Sparks.
Weidmer v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 3 St. Rep. 678;.
41 Hun, 284; 23 St. Rep. 859; 114 N. Y. 462.
O’Neill v. N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 45 Hun, 458; 10
St. Rep. 147; aff'd 26 St. Rep. 269, and 115 N. Y.
579; applied 33 St. Rep. 571, and 11 Supp. 308.
O. Collins v. N.Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 5 Hun, 499.
Same facts. 5
F. Collins v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 5 Hun, 503;.
aff'd 71 N. Y. 609.
T. Collins v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 33 St. Rep.
569; 11 Supp. 308; 23 Week. Dig. 154; 109 N. Y.
243.
Billings v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 34 St. Rep. 382; 11
Supp. 837; aff’d 128 N. Y. 644.
Sugarman v. Manhattan El. Ry. Co., 42 St. Rep. 30; 16:
Supp. 533.
Genung v..N. Y. & New England R. R. Co., 50 St. Rep.
511; 21 Supp. 97
Martin v. N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 62 Hun, 181; 41
St. Rep. 217; 16 Supp. 499.
Van Ostrand v. Walkill V. R. R. Co., 46 St. Rep. 456;
19 Supp. 621. :
Babcock v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 46 St. Rep. 796; 19
Supp. 774; 67 Hun, 469; 51 St. Rep, 115; 22 Supp.
449; rev. 55 St. Rep. 640, and 140 N. Y. 308.
Wheeler v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 67 Hun, 639;
51 St. Rep. 471; 22 Supp. 561.
Dwight v. Elmira, C.& N. R. R. Co., 29 St. Rep. 250; 8
Supp. 789; 5 Silv. 596; 43 St. Rep. 723; 132 N. Y.
199.
Flinn v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 58 Hun, 230; 34
St. Rep. 451; 12 Supp. 341; 67 Hun, 631; 51 St. Rep.
103 ; 22 Supp. 473; rev. 58 St. Rep. 431, and 142 N. Y.
II.
Frace v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R. R. Co., 68 Hun, 325; 52
St. Rep. 102; 22 Supp. 958; rev. 62 St. Rep. 166, and
143 N. Y. 182.
Phoenix Ins. Co. v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 75 Hun,
216; 58 St. Rep. 283; 26 Supp. 1102.
384 RAILROADS — STEAM.
FIRES.
Sparks.
Van Nostrand v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 78 Hun,
549; 61 St. Rep. 167; 29 Supp. 625.
Frier v. D. & H. C. Co., 86 Hun, 464; 67 St. Rep. 541;
33 Supp. 886. .
Flynn v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 1 Misc. 188; 48 St. Rep.
670; 20 Supp. 652.
Brown v. Buffalo, R. & P. R. R. Co., 4 App. Div. 465;
74 St. Rep. 149; 38 Supp. 655.
Brush v. Long Island R. R. Co., 10 App. Div. 535; 76
St. Rep. 103 ; 42 Supp. 103.
Jamieson v. N. Y. & Rockaway B. R. R. Co., 11 App.
Div. 50; 76 St. Rep. 915; 42 Supp. 915.
Dougherty v. King, 22 App. Div. 610.
Unclassified.
‘Measure of damages ; standing fruit trees.
Haskell v. Northern A. R. R. Co., 49 St. Rep. 483; 21
Supp. 234; 74 Hun, 380; 56 St. Rep. 303; 26 Supp.
595:
Burning ties; spread to mill.
Townley v. Fall Brook Co., 35 St. Rep. 975; 12 Supp.
649.
Spread from grass on right of way.
Eighme v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep. 757; 10
Supp. 636.
Shanty caught fire and spread to house.
Van Fleet v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 27 St. Rep.
76; 7 Supp. 636.
Canal boat. Assignment of claims.
Ridell v. N. ¥.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 73 N. Y. 618.
Sparks from switch shanty.
Byges v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 1 Sheld. 402;
aff'd 1 Sheld. 423; 72 N. Y. 26.
Burning brand thrown from locomotive.
McCoun v. N. Y. C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 66 Barb. 338;
50 N. Y. 176; applied 54 Hun, 437, and 27 St. Rep.
294, and 18 Civ. Pro. 69, and 7 Supp. 613; dist. 37 St.
Rep. 317, and 14 Supp. 120; followed 46 Hun, 238,
and 11 St. Rep. 302, and 12 Civ. Pro. 326, and 27
Week. Dig. 471.
RAILROADS — STEAM, 385
FRIGHTENED HORSES.
Frightened horse.
Rill v. R., W. & C. R. R. Co., 23 Week. Dig. 416.
Horse frightened and died.
Moshier v. Utica & S. R. R. Co., 8 Barb. 427.
Ran into obstructions at side of road.
Coy v. Utica & S. R. R. Co., 23 Barb. 643; dist. 62
Barb. 299.
Unloading car on side track.
Newson v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 29 N. Y. 383; dist. 62
Hun, 590, and 42 St. Rep. 580, and 17 Supp. 302.
Obstructed view at crossing; whistle frightened horse; thrown
out.
Voak v. Northern C. Ry. Co., 75 N. Y. 320.
Steam from standing locomotive.
Borst v. L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co., 4 Hun, 346; aff’d 66
N. Y. 639; followed 10 J. & S. 225.
Horses drowned in canal; negligent management of train.
Graville v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 34 Hun, 224;
aff'd 5 St. Rep. 721, and 25 Week. Dig. 386, and 1
Silv. 331, and 104 N. Y. 674.
On road to freight depot.
Schultz v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 69 Hun, 515; 53
St. Rep. 149; 23 Supp. 509; aff’d 63 St. Rep. 867, and
143 N. Y. 670.
Whistle.
Van Inwegen v. N. Y., L. E.& W. R. R. Co., 76 Hun,
53; 59 St. Rep. 289; 28 Supp. 169.
Noise of engine.
Lamming v. Galusha, 63 Hun, 32; 43 St. Rep. 592; 17
Supp. 328; 22 Civ. Pro. 16; rev. 47 St. Rep. 831, and
135 N. Y. 239; 81 Hun, 247; 62 St. Rep. 700; 30
Supp. 767; aff’d 151 N. Y. 648.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Cars near crossing suddenly started.
Bronk v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig. 259.
Nolan v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 22 Week. Dig. 61.
Conway v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 1 St. Rep. 587.
Howard v. Northern C. R. R. Co., 17 St. Rep. 190; 1
Supp. 528.
[25]
RAILROADS — STEAM,
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Cars near crossing suddenly started.
Salmon v. N. Y. C. & H. R.R. R. Co., 23 St. Rep. 442:
5 Supp. 225; 1 Silv. S. C. 237.
Eaton v. Erie Ry. Co., 51 N. Y. 544.
Maginnis v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 52 N. Y. 215.
Webber v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 58 N. Y. 451;
67 N. Y. 587.
Anderson v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 25 St. Rep.
158; 6 Supp. 182; 2 Silv. S. C. 9; aff'd 125 N. Y. zor.
Corcoran v. Ulster & D. R. R. Co., 75 St. Rep. 482; 40
Supp. I117.
Clear view — driving.
Steves v. Oswego & S. R. R. Co., 18 N. Y. 422; adhered
to 24 N. Y. 430.
Sheffield v. Rochester & S. R. R. Co., 21 Barb. 339;
approved 27 Barb. 528.
Brown v. Buffalo & S. L. R. R. Co., 22 N. Y. 191; ques-
tioned and dist. 2 Keyes, 154; overruled 14 Abb. Pr.
N.S. 29; referred to 64 N. Y. 524; which aff'd 6 Hun,
314; overruled 6 J. & S. 133; reviewed 84 N. Y. 488.
Brooks v. Buffalo & N. F. R. R. Co., 25 Barb. 600;
aff'd 1 Abb. C. A. D. 211; 27 Barb. 532, n.
Dascomb v. Buffalo R. R. Co., 27 Barb. 221; approved
7 Robt. 616.
Wilds v. H. R. R. R. Co., 33 Barb. 503; rev. 24 N. Y.
430; applied 4o N. Y. 34; dist. 40 Barb. 207; exam-
ined 3 Abb. Pr. N. S. 110; applied 24 How. Pr. 336;
23 How. Pr. 492; 29 N. Y.°315; dist. 34 N. Y. 629;
commented on 39 N. Y. 362; applied 34 N. Y. 12.
Ernst v. H. R. R. R. Co., 32 Barb. 159; 19 How. Pr.
* 205; 24 How. Pr. 97; 32 How. Pr. 262; 35 N. Y. 9;
applied 6 Robt. 102; explained 39 How. Pr. 414; ap-
proved and followed 41 N. Y. 299; dist. 54 N. Y. 468;
explained and applied 7 Robt. 616; applied 85 N. Y.
225; 32 How. Pr. 61; 3 Abb. Pr. N. S. 82; 39 N. Y.
61; applied 78 N. Y. 518; which aff’d 6 Abb. N. C.
104; 36 How. Pr. 84.
Connelly v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 88 N. Y. 346;
followed 11 St. Rep. 797.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 387
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Clear view — driving.
Bronk v. N. Y.& N. H.R. R. Co., 5 Daly, 454;95 N. Y.
656.
Fastnacht v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 8 Week. Dig.
162.
Shear v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 16 Week. Dig. 181.
M. Smith v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 19 Week. Dig.
230; 11 St. Rep 795; dist. 19 St. Rep. 483, and 2
Supp. 719.
Stackus v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 7 Hun, 559; 79
N. Y. 464; applied 17 J. & S. 185; followed 31 Hun,
397; followed 13 Week. Dig. 108.
Tolman v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 27 Hun, 326;
g2 N. Y. 353; 35 Hun, 397; 98 N. Y. 198; applied 44
Hun, 108, and 8 St. Rep. 458, and 26 Week. Dig.
250; applied 29 St. Rep. 544, and 8 Supp. 744; ap-
proved 35 St. Rep. 752, and 13 Supp. 177; followed
120 N. Y. 293, and 30 St. Rep. 932.
Thompson v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 33 Hun, 16;
rev. 16 ‘St. Rep. 869, and 2 Silv. 82, and 110 N. Y.
636; dist. 21 St. Rep. 687, and 4 Supp. 265. |
C.J. Smith v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 38 Hun, 33.
Tozer v.N. Y.C.& H: R. R. R. Co., 38 Hun, 100; rev.
6 St. Rep. 447, and 26 Week. Dig. 72, and 1 Silv.
371, and 105 N. Y. 617; dist. 115 N. Y. 63, and 23 St.
Rep. 729; dist. 26 St. Rep. 640, and 7 Supp. 249; 8 St.
Rep. 56; 26 Week. Dig. 435; 1 Silv. 450; 105 N. Y.
659.
Corbett vy. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 12 St. Rep. 868.
Hoag v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 19 St. Rep. 80; 21
Week. Dig. 506; 36 Hun, 646; 111 N. Y. 199; applied
41 St. Rep. 223, and 16 Supp. 495; followed 120 N. Y.
294, and 30 St. Rep. 932.
Kain v. N. Y. & N. E. R. R. Co., 20 St. Rep. 891; 3
Supp. 311.
Cullen v. D. & H. C. Co., 23 St. Rep. 719; 23 Week.
Dig. 474; 2 Silv. 255; 113 N. Y. 667.
Brickell v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 12 St. Rep. 450;
aff'd 30 St. Rep. 932, and 120 N. Y. 290.
388 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Clear view — driving.
Mulligan v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 33 St. Rep
534; 11 Supp. 482; 43 St. Rep. 969; 19 Supp. 1009
aff'd 50 St. Rep. 929, and 136 N. Y. 567; applied 4c
St. Rep. 851, and 16 Supp. 826.
Mehegan v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 36 St. Rep.
188; 3 Silv. 438; 125 N. Y. 768; followed 46 St. Rep.
497, and 19 Supp. 444.
Fleissner v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 4o St. Rep.
711; 16 Supp. 18.
Crandell v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 72 Hun, 431; 55
St. Rep. 170; 25 Supp. 151; aff’d 151 N. Y. 642.
Stopp v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 178; 61 St. Rep.
629; 29 Supp. 1008.
S. Miller v. N. ¥Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 81 Hun, 152; 62
St. Rep. 734; 30 Supp. 751.
Von Atzinger v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 83 Hun,
120; 64 St. Rep. 269; 31 Supp. 632.
Durkee v. D. & H. C. Co., 88 Hun, 471; 69 St. Rep. 39:
34 Supp. 978.
Belch v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 90 Hun, 477; 71
St. Rep. 225; 36 Supp. 56.
Allen v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 92 Hun, 589; 71
St. Rep. 791 ; 36 Supp. 624.
Moore v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 2 Misc. 23; 49 St.
Rep. 516; 21 Supp. 436; followed 2 Misc. 29, and 22
Supp. 1136. d
Same accident.
Hughes v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 2 Misc. 29; 60
St. Rep. 869; 142 N. Y. 653.
Felska v. N. ¥Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 152 N. Y. 3309.
Stever v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 7 App. Div. 392;
39 Supp. 944.
Bailey v. Jourdan, 18 App. Div. 387.
Hunt v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 212.
Clear view — pedestrians — adults.
Schwartz v. H. R. R. R. Co., 4 Robt. 347.
Wilcox ¥; Ris Wy & O. R: R. Co., 39 N. ¥. 388: dist.
39 How. Pr. 414; dist. 54 N. Y. 468; dist. 64 N. Y.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 389
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Clear view — pedestrians — adults.
529; followed 2 Hun, 535; followed 41 N. Y. 503;
applied and followed 4o N. Y. 22; applied and fol-
lowed 49 N. Y. 299.
Havens v. Erie R. R. Co., 53 Barb. 328; rev. 41 N. Y.
296; explained 51 N. Y. 548.
Gorton v. Erie R. R. Co., 45 N. Y. 660.
Haight v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 7 Lans. 11;
applied 75 N. Y. 279.
Miller v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 13 Week. Dig.
145.
McGrath v. D. & H. C. Co., 14 Week. Dig. 574.
Day v. Flushing, N. & S. R. R. Co., 75 N. Y. 610.
Becht v. Corbin, 92 N. Y. 658.
‘Woodard v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 11 St. Rep.
169; 20 Week. Dig. 435; 27 Week. Dig. 115; 106
N. Y. 369; dist. 4o St. Rep. 850, and 16 Supp. 826;
followed 125 N. Y. 411, and 35 St. Rep. 435; followed
47 Hun, 428, and 14 St. Rep. 291, and 28 Week. Dig.
315; followed 17 St. Rep. 192, and 1 Supp. 528.
Scott v. Pennsylvania Ry. Co., 30 St. Rep. 843; 9 Supp.
189; rev. 41 St. Rep. 712, and 3 Silv. 624, and 130
N. Y. 679.
Burke v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 49 St. Rep. 370;
20 Supp. 808; 73 Hun, 32; 57 St. Rep. 7; 25 Supp.
1009.
Fowler v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 74 Hun, 141; 56 St. Rep.
307; 26 Supp. 218; aff’d 147 N. Y. 717.
Bates v. N. ¥Y. C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 84 Hun, 287; 65
St. Rep. 496; 32 Supp. 337.
Clear view — pedestrians — infants.
Flood v. Buffalo, N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 23 Week. Dig.
501; reviewed 12 St. Rep. 92.
Reynolds v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 2 T. & C. 644;
rev. 58 N. Y. 248; dist. 13 Daly, 217; followed 124
N. Y. 316, and 36 St. Rep. 272; applied 11 Hun, 544;
applied 75 N. Y. 332; explained 23 Hun, 76; followed
o2 N. Y. 658; applied 6 Abb. N. C. 128; followed 60
N. Y. 326; applied 18 Hun, 194; applied 9 J. & S. 29;
390 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Clear view — pedestrians — infants.
applied 8 J. & S. 175; dist. 19 Hun, 34; dist. 64 N. Y.
529; which aff'd 6 Hun, 314.
Schwier v. N. Y.C. & H. R«R. R. Co., 15 Hun, 572; 90
N. Y. 558.
Wiley v. Long Island R. R. Co., 76 Hun, 29; 59 St. Rep.
157; 27 Supp. 722; aff'd 144 N. Y. 717.
Wendell v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 14 Week. Dig.
406; 91 N. Y. 420; applied 46 Hun, 186, and 11 St.
Rep. 537, and 27 Week. Dig. 265; dist. 4 Supp. 846;
explained 115 N. Y, 110, and 23 St. Rep. 551.
Tucker v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 33 St. Rep. 863;
11 Supp. 692; rev. 36 St. Rep. 273, and 124 N. Y. 308;
applied 65 Hun, 581, and 48 St. Rep. 806, and 20
Supp. 557.
Chrystal v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 22 Week. Dig. 551;
6 St. Rep. 833; 26 Week. Dig. 186; 105 N. Y. 164;
followed 44 St. Rep. 272, and 17 Supp. .741; 52 Hun,
55; 22 St. Rep. 384; 4 Supp. 793; rev. 36 St. Rep.
699, and 124 N. Y. 519.
Frightened horses.
Cars started.
Wilson v. Rochester & S. R. R. Co., 16 Barb. 167.
Plunged forward.
Robinson v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 65 Barb. 146;
aff'd 66 N. Y. 11; see 20 Blatch. 338; dist. 109 N. Y.
22, and 14 St. Rep. 29, and 28 Week. Dig. 250; fol-
lowed and applied 84 N. Y. 247; followed and ap-
plied 13 Week. Dig. 395.
Frighteffed horse.
Albert v. D. & H. C. Co., 22 Week. Dig. 8.
Sudden escape of steam.
Lenhart v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig.
17; 98 N. Y. 635.
Horse ran into locomotive
Cosgrove v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 13 Week. Dig.
487; 13 Hun, 329; explained 84 N. Y. 247; overruled
87 N. Y. 88.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 391
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Frightened horses.
Same accident.
Barringer v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 18 Hun, 398;
explained 84 N. Y. 247.
Horse backed on train.
Bell v. N. ¥Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 29 Hun, 560.
Horse sprang forward.
Popp v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 26 St. Rep. 639; 7 Supp.
249.
Horse ran on track.
Mayer v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 29 St. Rep. 183;
8 Supp. 461; aff'd 132 N. Y. 579.
Train parted to let team through. Safety valve.
Keech v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 14 Civ. Pro. 167; 14
St. Rep. 446; 28 Week. Dig. 350; 35 St. Rep. 902; 13
Supp. 149.
Gate lowered and raised frightened horses.
Putnam v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 28 Week. Dig.
294; 47 Hun, 439; 14 St. Rep. 329.
Gates raised for plaintiff on foot. Horse crossed and fright-
ened by steam of locomotive.
Scaggs v. D. & H.C. Co., 74 Hun, 198; 56 St. Rep.
319; 26 Supp. 323; rev. 64 St. Rep. 594, and 145 N. Y.
201.
Horses frightened by whistle and wagon upset.
Samuel Philips v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 84 Hun,
412; 65 St. Rep. 534; 32 Supp. 299.
Freight on crossing for 20 minutes. Other train came up
behind.
Laible v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 13 App. Div. 574;
77 St. Rep. 1003; 43 Supp. 1003.
Hit by contents of wagon struck by train.
Coal cart hit at crossing and thrown against plaintiff.
Quill v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 16 Daly, 313;
32 St. Rep. 612; 11 Supp. 80; aff’d 36 St. Rep. 1012,
and 126 N. Y. 629.
At crossing ; view obstructed. Wagon hit and box thrown on
pedestrian.
Bond v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 476; 52
St. Rep. 637; 23 Supp. 450.
92 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
bstructed view — buildings — driving.
Hegeman v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 2 Alb. L. J. 50.
Betzki v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 16 Week. Dig. 527.
A, M. Cook y, N. ¥. C. R. R. Co. 3 Keyes,,476; §
Lans. 401; 1 Abb. C. A. D. 432; dist. 123 N. Y. 5, and
33 St. Rep. 46.
Morse v. Erie Ry. Co., 65 Barb. 490.
Carr v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 60 N. Y. 633.
Massoth v. D. & H. C. Co., 6 Hun, 317; aff'd 64 N. Y.
529; applied 4 Abb. N. C. 39; followed 46 St. Rep.
913, and 19 Supp. 839; applied 17 Hun, 117; applied
18 Hun, 192; examined 17 Hun, 42; applied 72 N. Y.
69; examined 84 N. Y. 488.
Dyer v. Erie Ry. Co., 71 N. Y. 228; dist. 109 N. Y. 22,
and 14 St. Rep. 29, and 28 Week. Dig. 250; followed
84 N. Y. 247; followed 13 Week. Dig. 395; applied
& Abb. N. C. 3g2.
Salter v. Utica & B. R. R. Co., 3 T. & C. 800; rev. 59
N. Y. 631; 13 Hun, 187; rev. 75 N. Y. 273; dist. 79
N. Y. 72; 23 Hun, 533; aff'd 86 N. Y. 4o1; followed
105 N. Y. 671; followed 89 N. Y. 412; dist. 26 Hun,
546; 88 N. Y. 42.
Hoffmann v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 67 Hun, 581; 51 St.
Rep. 245; 22 Supp. 463; followed 51 St. Rep. 940;
84 Hun, 144; 65 St. Rep. 713; 32 Supp. 439.
Richardson v. N. Y. C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 40 St. Rep.
616; 15 Supp. 868; aff’d 45 N. Y. 846, and 133 N. Y.
563; dist. 70 N. Y. 1109.
Bennett v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 40 St. Rep. 948;
16 Supp. 765; aff'd 133 N. Y. 563.
Pitts v. N. Y., L. E.& W.R.R. Co., 79 Hun, 546; 61
®t. Rep. 559; 29 Supp. 871; aff'd 152 N. Y. 623.
Shires v. Fonda, J. & G. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 92; 62 St.
Rep. 4; 30 Supp. 175.
Same accident.
Miles v. Fonda, J. & G. R. R. Co., 86 Hun, 508; 67 St.
Rep. 552; 33 Supp. 720.
J. Miller v. N. ¥Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 82 Hun, 1643 63
St. Rep. 766; 31 Supp. 317; aff'd 152 N. Y. 625.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 393
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Obstructed view — buildings — driving.
Meddaugh v. N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 86 Hun, 620;
67 St. Rep: 540; 33 Supp. 793; aff'd 153 N. Y. 659.
Wilcox v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 263;
68 St. Rep. 563; 34 Supp. 744.
Judson v. Central Vt. R. R. Co., 91 Hun, 1; 71 St. Rep.
420; 36 Supp. 83.
Obstructed view — buildings — pedestrians.
Infant.
Dowling v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 90 N. Y. 670.
Hilarious party.
Koehler v. Rochester & L. O. Ry. Co., 66 Hun, 566;
50 St. Rep. 619; 21 Supp. 844.
Obstructed view — cars on track — driving.
Shaw v. Jewett, 13 Week. Dig. 80; 86 N. Y. 616.
Crawford v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 13 St. Rep. 298; 22
J. & S. 262;.23 J. & S. 255; 28 Week. Dig. 56; see
121 N. Y. 652.
Bleyle v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 27 Week. Dig. 409; 11 St.
Rep. 585; aff'd 22 St. Rep. 993, and 113 N. Y. 626.
Towns v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 28 St. Rep. 124; 8
Supp. 137; aff'd 124 N. Y. 642.
Perkins v. Buffalo, R. & P. R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep. 41; 10
Supp.-356; aff'd 125 N. Y. 776.
Oldenburg v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 33 St. Rep.
663; 11 Supp. 689; 36 St. Rep. 402; 124 N. Y. 414;
which aff’d 29 St. Rep. 836, and g Supp. 419. ;
Haywood v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 35 St. Rep.
748; 13'Supp. 177; aff'd 128 N. Y. 506.
Hermans v. N. Y. C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 43 St. Rep.
goo; 17 Supp. 319; 50 St. Rep. 932; 127 N. Y. 558.
Henning v. Caldwell, 45 St. Rep. 373; 18 Supp. 339; 50
St. Rep. 931.
Canfield v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 46 St. Rep. g11;
19 Supp. 839; 54 St. Rep. 931; 139 N. Y. 617.
Sherry v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 40 Hun, 634; 5 St. Rep.
374; 1 Silv. 319; 25 Week. Dig. 287; 104 N. Y. 652.
394 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING. /
Obstructed view — cars on track — driving.
Petrie v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 66 Hun, 282; 49
St. Rep. 279; 21 Supp. 159.
Crosby v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 196; 68
St. Rep. 695; 34 Supp. 714; 5 App. Div. 619; 72 St.
Rep. 866; 38 Supp. 1142.
Moore v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 2 Misc. 23; 49
St. Rep. 516; 21 Supp. 436; followed 2 Misc. 29, and
22 Supp. 1136; 75 Hun, 381; 57 St. Rep. 695; 27
Supp. 449; aff'd 60 St. Rep. 869, and 142 N. Y. 652.
Schlee v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 13 Misc. 649; 69
St. Rep. 152; 34 Supp. 928.
Clark v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 4 App. Div. 331;
74 St. Rep. 183; 38 Supp. 563; 17 Misc. 113; 40 Supp.
730.
Haupt v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 18 Misc. 594; 76
St. Rep. 477; 42 Supp. 477; 20 Misc. 291; 79 St. Rep.
666; 45 Supp. 666.
Obstructed view — cars on track — pedestrians.
Mitchell v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 2 Hun, 535; 5
T. & C. 122; aft’d 64 N. Y. 655; explained 23 Hun,
449.
Kissenger v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 4 J. & S. 572; aff'd
56 N. Y. 538.
Sutherland v.N. Y C.& H.R. R.R. Co, 9 J.& 58.17;
compared 10 J. & S. 223.
Krauss v. Wallkill Valley R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 482; 52
St. Rep. 838; 23 Supp. 432; 64 St. Rep. 875; 31 Supp.
1129.
Zwack v.N. Y., L. E.& W.R.R. Co., 8 App. Div. 483;
40 Supp. 821.
Noble v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 20 App. Div. 4o.
Cbstructed view — hills and embankments — driving.
High embankments.
Haring v. N. Y. & E.R. R. Co., 13 Barb. 9.
Corn hills.
Davis v.N. ¥. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 47 N. Y. 400; ap-
plied 7 Hun, 561; applied 58 N. Y. 251; applied 6 T.
& C. 417; dist. 54 N. Y. 471.
N
RAILROADS — STEAM. 395
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Obstructed view — hills and enbankments — driving.
Hill.
Bomboy v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 47 Hun, 425;
14 St. Rep. 291; 28 Week. Dig. 315.
Embankment and fence.
Wellenhoffer v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 50 St.
Rep. 111; 21 Supp. 866.
Hill.
Hennessy v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 73 Hun, 569; 56
St. Rep. 151; 26 Supp. 321; aff’d 147 N. Y. 721.
Obstructed view — smoke — driving.
Foran v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 64 Hun, 510; 46
St. Rep. 423; 19 Supp. 417.
Vahnev. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 18 App. Div. 452;
46 Supp. 359.
Obstructed view — smoke — pedestrians.
Heaney v. Long Island R. R. Co., 9 St. Rep. 707; rev.
20 St. Rep. 296, and 112 N. Y. 122; dist. 49 St. Rep.
397, and 136 N. Y. 653; applied 4o St. Rep. 567, and
15 Supp. 941; followed 64 Hun, 512, and 46 St. Rep.
423, and 19 Supp. 417; followed 46 St. Rep. 440, and
19 Supp. 497.
McNamara v. N. Y.C. & H. R..R. R. Co., 46 St. Rep.
439; I9 Supp. 497; rev. 49 St. Rep. 395, and 136
N. Y. 650.
Lortz v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 83 Hun, 271; 65
St. Rep. 63; 31 Supp. 1033; 7 App. Div. 515; 40
Supp. 253.
Manley.v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 18 Misc. 502;
76 St. Rep. 1076; 42 Supp. 1076; 18 App. Div. 420;
79 St. Rep. 1108; 45 Supp. 1108.
Obstructed view — track in cut — driving.
Baxter v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 41 N. Y. 502.
McShean v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 6 Alb. L, J.
110; 52 N. Y. 629.
Kellogg v. N. Y.C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 79 N. Y. 72;
dist. 43 Hun, 376, and 4 St. Rep. 784, and 26 Week.
396 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Obstructed view — track in cut — driving.
Dig. 140; dist. 58 Hun, 433, and 35 St. Rep. 556, and
12 Supp. 527.
Sykes v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 25 Hun, 61; 12 Week.
Dig. 430.
Diebolt v. Jewett, 22 Week. Dig. 155.
K. Cook v. N. ¥.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 35 St. Rep. 525;
15 Supp. 45; aff’d 128 N. Y. 635.
Whalen v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 58 Hun, 431; 35
St. Rep. 556; 12 Supp. 527; 40 St. Rep. 566; 15 Supp.
941.
Kelsey v. Staten Island R. T. R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 208;
60 St. Rep. 180; 28 Supp. 974.
Obstructed view — unclassified — driving.
Clouds of dust.
Hart v. Erie Ry. Co., 3 Alb. L. J. 312.
Defendants’ wood house and wood piles.
Mackey v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 27 Barb. 528.
Aff’d sub nom.,
Mackay v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 35 N. Y. 75.
Horse killed.
Glushing v. Sharp, 96 N. Y. 676; applied 52 Hun, 280,
and 22 St. Rep. 594, and 5 Supp. 285; dist. 47 Hun,
248, and 14 St. Rep. 291, and 28 Week. Dig. 315; fol-
lowed 112 N. Y. 241, and 20 St. Rep. 904.
Wood piles.
Halsey v. R.. W. & O. R. R. Co., 12 St. Rep. 319; aff'd
113 N. Y. 622.
Driving snow storm.
Powell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 23 Week. Dig.
0107; 22 Hun, 56; 14 St. Rep. 74; 2 Sil. 9; 109 N. Y.
613; 3 Supp. 763; 14 Civ. Pro. 125.
Trees.
Skinner v. Prospect P. & C. I. R. R. Co., 51 St. Rep.
554; 22 Supp. 30; aff'd 55 St. Rep. 929, and 140 N. Y.
621.
Trees on land of defendant. '
Gaylord v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 23 Week.
Dig. 396; 105 N. Y. 647.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 397
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Obstructed view — unclassified — driving.
Gates open ; superintendent’s special dummy.
Palmer v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 26 Week. Dig.
26; 5 St. Rep. 436; aff'd 20 St. Rep. 904, and 112
N. Y. 234; criticised 52 Hun, 490, and 24 St. Rep.
629, and 5 Supp. 684.
Infant. Fence, snow and hills.
Jones v. Utica & B. R. R. R. Co., 36 Hun, 115; 18
Week. Dig. 432; 40 Hun, 349; followed 42 St. Rep.
228, and 17 Supp. 187.
Sign board.
Austin v. Long Island R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 67; 52 St.
Rep. 746; 23 Supp. 193; aff’d 55 St. Rep. 931, and
140 N. Y. 639.
View obstructed till within 4o feet of track.
D, A, Smith y. N. ¥. C. & EL. BR. RB. R: Co, 38 Supp.
666; rev. 4 App. Div. 493, and 39 Supp. 1119.
Obstructed view — unclassified — pedestrians.
Very dark; no light nor bell.
Donovan v. Long Island R. R. Co., 67 Hun, 73; 51 St.
Rep. 183; 22 Supp. 62.
Bushes.
Martin v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 27 Hun, 532.
Girl of 19; dark night.
L. Seeley v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 8 App. Div..
402; 75 St. Rep. 261; 40 Supp. 866; 102 N. Y. 719.
Wagon box. j
Kilbride v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 17 App. Div.
177; 79 St. Rep. 302; 45 Supp. 302.
Train across crossing.
Climbing on bumper; cars moved.
O’Mara v. D. & H.C. Co., 18 Hun, 192.
Train broken to let people through. Car kicked.
Mahar v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 19 Hun, 32.
Hit by another train.
Dolan v. D. & H.C. Co., 71 N. Y. 285.
398 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Train across crossing.
Train broken.
Young v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 12 St. Rep. 285;
27 Week. Dig. 540; 107 N. Y. 500; followed 125 N. Y.
411, and 35 St. Rep. 435.
Told to climb over; train started.
Phillips v. N. Y. & N. E. R. R. Co., 80 Hun, 404; 62
St. Rep. 59; 30 Supp. 333.
Hit by other train.
Du Boise v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 10;
68 St. Rep. 158; 34 Supp. 279.
Train just passed — driving.
Lake v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig.
289.
Ingersoll v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 4 Hun, 277; 6
T. & C. 416; aff'd 66 N. Y. 612.
Smedis v. Brooklyn & R. B. R.R. Co., 23 Hun, 279; 88
N. Y. 13.
Hamm v. N.Y. C. R. R. Co., 18 J. & S. 78.
Endress v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 19 St. Rep. 481; 2
Supp. 719; 117 N, Y. 640.
Rodrian v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 28 St. Rep.
625; 7 Supp. 811; rev. 35 St. Rep. 814, and 125 N. Y.
526; dist. 52 St. Rep. 353, and 138 N. Y. 305.
Kane v. N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 31 St. Rep. 741;
9 Supp. 879; aff’d 43 St. Rep. 494, and 132 N. Y. 160.
Callaghan v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 52 Hun, 276; 22
St. Rep. 504; 5 Supp. 285; 124 N. Y. 643.
Van Raden v. N. Y.. N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 56 Hun,
0; 30 St. Rep. 300; 8 Supp. 914.
Sauerborn v. N. Y C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 69 Hun, 429;
52 St. Rep. 784; 23 Supp. 478; aff’d 57 St. Rep. 865,
and 141 N. Y. 553.
Puff v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 71 Hun, 577; 55 St.
Rep. 91; 24 Supp. 1068.
Stott v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 50 St. Rep. soo;
502; 21 Supp. 354; aff'd 55 St. Rep. 930, and 140 N.
Y. 622.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 399
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Train just passed — driving.
Same accident.
Parshall v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 50 St. Rep.
502; 21 Supp. 354; aff'd 55 St. Rep. 930, and 140 N. Y.
622.
Wilbur v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 85 Hun, 155; 65 St.
Rep. 664; 32 Supp. 479.
Hurley v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 90 Hun, 1; 69
St. Rep. 738; 35 Supp. 351.
Hickey v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 8 App. Div. 123;
40 Supp. 484.
Fefdowski v. D. & H. C. Co., 12 App. Div. 589.
Lamb v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 18 App. Div. 570.
Train just passed — pedestrians — adults.
Beisiegel v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 33 Barb. 429; rev. 34
N. Y. 622; approved 6 Robt. 93; 40 N. Y. 9; criticised
39 How. Pr. 407; applied 71 N. Y. 231; applied 45
N. Y. 850; explained 58 N. Y. 458; followed 13 Week.
Dig. 395 ; followed 6 Abb. N. C. 104; followed 8 Daly,
220; which was aff’d 78 N. Y. 523; 14 Abb. Pr. N.S.
29; followed 6 J. & S. 133; applied 6 Daly, 494; ap-
proved &4 N. Y. 488.
Greany v. Long Island R. R. Co., 18 Week. Dig. 463;
tol N. Y. 419; dist. 106 N. Y. 375, and 11 St. Rep.
169, and 27 Week. Dig. 115; dist. 47 Hun, 428, and
14 St. Rep. 291, and 28 Week. Dig. 315; followed 54
Hun, 457, and 28 St. Rep. 132, and 7 Supp. 709.
Suiter v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 7 St. Rep. 687;
followed 32 St. Rep. 382, and 10 Supp. 354.
Grapp v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 22 Week. Dig. 125.
O’Donnell v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 12 St. Rep.
206; aff'd 113 N. Y. 641.
Cheney v. N. ¥.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 16 Hun, 415;
75 St. Rep. 423; 40 Supp. 1103.
Northrup v. N. Y., O. & W. R. R. Co., 37 Hun, 295.
Leonard v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 10 J. & S. 225;
12 J. & S. 575; aff'd 80 N. Y. 659.
Waldele v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 95 N. Y. 274;
_ dist. 41 Hun, 115, and 4 St. Rep. 1; followed 103
400
RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Train just passed — pedestrians — adults.
N. Y. 629, and 4 St. Rep. 303, and 25 Week. Dig.
197; followed 58 Hun, 24, and 33 St. Rep. 437, and
11 Supp. 498; 29 Hun, 35; 19 Hun, 69; 35 Supp.
1009; 4 App. Div. 549; 74 St. Rep. 819; 38 Supp.
1009.
Donohue v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 47 St. Rep. 161; 19
Supp. 961.
McPeak v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 85 Hun, 107;
66 St. Rep. 29; 32 Supp. 647.
Purdy v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 87 Hun, 97; 67
St. Rep. 676; 33 Supp. 952.
Collins v. N. Y., C. & St. L. R. R. Co., 92 Hun, 563;
72 St. Rep. 325; 36 Supp. 942.
Lehman v. Great E. C. & I. Co., 7 App. Div. 424; 39
Supp. 91.
Burns v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 13 App. Div.
483; 77 St. Rep. 391; 43 Supp. 391.
Hennessy v. Northern Cent. Ry. Co., 17 App. Div. 162;
79 St. Rep. 147; 45 Supp. 147.
Train just passed — pedestrians — infants.
McGrath v. H. R. R. R. Co., 32 Barb. 144; 19 How. Pr.
211; approved 57 Barb. 644.
O’Mara v. H. R. R. R. Co., 38 N. Y. 445; applied 6
Abb. N. C.104; applied 65 Barb. 101; applied 43
How. Pr. 411; applied 3 Lans. 473; dist. 60 N. Y. 137.
Reynolds y. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 2 T. & C. 644;
rev. 58 N. Y. 248; dist. 13 Daly, 217; followed 36 St.
Rep. 272, and 124 N. Y. 316; applied rr Hun, 544;
»@Ppplied 75 N. Y. 332; explained 23 Hun, 76; followed
* 02 N. Y. 658; applied 6 Abb. N. C. 128; followed 6o:
N. Y. 326; applied 18 Hun, 194; applied 9 J. & S. 20;
applied 8 J. & S. 175; dist. 19 Hun, 34; dist. 64 N. Y.
529; which aff'd 6 Hun, 314.
Haycroft v. L.S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 2 Hun, 489; 5 T. &
C. 49; aff'd 64 N. Y. 636; 2 Week. Dig. 155.
McGovern v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 67 N.Y. EZ §
explained and fellowed 8 Daly, 220.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 401
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Train just passed — pedestrians — infants.
Ryan v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 37 Hun, 186.
Finklestein v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 41 Hun, 34;
2 St. Rep. 680.
Cummings v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 5 Supp. 476;
1 Sil. 345; 1 Sil. S. C. 327; 104 N. Y. 669.
Crone v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 48 St. Rep. 408;
20 Supp. 529; 58 St. Rep. 866; 141 N. Y. 604.
Beckwith v. N. Y. C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 54 Hun, 446;
28 St. Rep. 130, 292; 7 Supp. 519, 721; aff’d 36 St.
Rep. 1010, and 125 N. Y. 759.
Bowen v.N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 89 Hun, 594; 70
St. Rep. 144; 35 Supp. 540; 18 N. Y. 408; approved
24 N. Y. 222.
Usual flagman away.
John Casey v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 8 Daly, 220;
6 Abb. N. C. 104; aff'd 78 N. Y. 518; explained 41 St.
Rep. 345, and 16 Supp. 518.
G. Zimmer v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 7 Hun, 552;
aff'd 67 N. Y. 601.
Glendening v. Sharp, 22 Hun, 78.
Coyle v. Long Island R. R. Co., 33 Hun, 37.
McGrath v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co. 1 T. & C. 243;
re-aff'd 3 T. & C. 776; 1 Hun, 437; rev. 59 N. Y. 468;
63 N. Y. 522; applied 13 Hun, 330; examined 84 N.
Y. 488; applied 10 J. & S. 233; dist. 52 St. Rep. 353,
and 138 N. Y. 302; applied g St. Rep. 709; dist. 29
St. Rep. 634, and 9 Supp. 153; explained 6 Abb. N. C.
125; which was aff'd 78 N. Y. 518.
Unclassified — driving.
Driving.
Lucas v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 21 Barb. 245.
Stopped to look and listen at a distance of 4 to 6 rods.
Renwick v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 36 N. Y. 132; 34 How.
Pr. 91; dist. 5 Daly, 79; explained and applied 39 N.
Y. 365.
[26]
402 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Unclassified — driving.
Train backed.
’ Grippen v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 40 N. Y. 34; followed
112 N. Y. 126, and 20 St. Rep. 296; explained 63
N. Y. 522; followed 13 Week. Dig. 395.
Flagman intoxicated. —
Warner v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 45 Barb. 299;
rev. 44 N. Y. 465: disapproved 65 Barb. 102; applied
7 J. &. S. 352; dist. 56 N. Y. 46; limited 17 Week.
Dig. 370; 52 N. Y. 437; followed 27 Hun, 219; see
65 Barb. 146.
Drove eight miles an hour after dark; ears muffled.
Ramsey v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 4 Week. Dig.
306.
Top of carriage up and driving fast.
McCall v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 54 N. Y. 642; followed
5 Daly, 454; dist. 79 N. Y. 468.
Usual conflict about bell and whistle.
Roach v. Flushing & N.S. R. R. Co., 58 N. Y. 626.
No flagman.
Culhane v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 67 Barb. 562;
60 N. Y. 133; dist. and limited 30 St. Rep. 847, and
9 Supp. 189; followed 54 Hun, 457, and 28 St. Rep.
132, and 7 Supp. 709.
Boy of 14.
Morrison v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 4 Hun, 424;
aff'd 63 N. Y. 643.
Driving.
Callaghan v. R.. W. & O. R. R. Co., 13 Week. Dig. 395.
Gate up.
Glasing v. Sharp, 14 Week. Dig. 167.
Drivin#®
Mead v. N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 16 Week. Dig.
414.
Excessive verdict.
Carpenter v. Buffalo, N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 38 Hun,
116; followed 46 Hun, 327, and 12 St. Rep. 457.
Locomotive backing at night. Gates out of repair.
Lindeman v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 42 Hun, 206;
3 St. Rep. 731; 25 Week. Dig. 114; approved 52 Hun,
RAILROADS — STEAM. 403
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Unclassified — driving.
281, and 22 St. Rep. 594, and 5 Supp. 285; 11 St. Rep.
837; aff'd 112 N. Y. 682.
Hand car.
Boll v. Adirondack R. R. Co., 22 St. Rep. 365; 4 Supp.
769.
Usual conflict about bell and whistle.
Totten v. N.Y. L. BE. & W. Ry R. Go, 92 St, Rep.
765; 10 Supp. 572.
Train backing.
McCaffrey v. D. & H. C. Co., 41 St. Rep. 221; 16 Supp.
495; aff'd 50 St. Rep. 934, and 137 N. Y. 568.
Intestate’s wagon between him and train; gate up.
Startz v. Pennsylvania & N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co., 42
St. Rep. 457; 16 Supp. 810; 49 St. Rep. 914; 136
N. Y. 639.
No cattle guard. Horse got on track.
Case v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 75 Hun, s27¢ 57
St. Rep. 653; 27 Supp. 496.
Passenger in wagon at night.
De Loge v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 92 Hun, 149;
71 St. Rep. 720; 36 Supp. 697.
Dummy in street; woman in hired carriage at funeral.
Callahan v. Sharp, 27 Hun, 85; re-argument 3 App. Div.
428, note, and 74 St. Rep. 141, and 38 Supp. 800;
aff’d 95 N. Y. 672.
Newly discovered evidence.
Clark v. N.Y. C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 4 App. Div. 331;
74 St. Rep. 183; 38 Supp. 563; 17 Misc. 113; 40
Supp. 730.
Horse tied in street; locomotive moving slowly.
Potter & P. Co.v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 22 Misc.
10.
Motorman of street R. R. injured. View obstructed by cars.
‘Locomotive near; conductor signalled “all right.”
Harper v..D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 273.
Asked a person on foot to look and was told to drive on.
Bronson v. N. Y.C.& H.R. RR. Co., 24 App. Div.
262.
404 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Unclassified — pedestrians — adults.
Lead horses over.
Burdick v. Erie Ry. Co., 4 Alb. L. J. 140.
Cars on switch blown on plaintiff. +
Nicholson v. Erie Ry. Co., 41 N. Y. 525; applied 108
N. Y. 213, and 13 St. Rep. 472, and 28 Week. Dig.
230; dist. 104 N. Y. 366, and 5 St. Rep. 722, and 25
Week. Dig. 514; dist. 6 Hun, 604.
Road was not a highway.
Matze v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 1 Hun, 417; 3
T.& C. 513.
Tried to prevent cow from going on track.
Campbell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 19 St. Rep.
659; 3 Supp. 694; aff'd 121 N. Y. 669.
At night. Gates failed to operate.
Rainey v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 68 Hun, 495; 52
St. Rep. 677; 23 Supp. 8o.
Tried to prevent cow from going on track.
Doyle v. Pennsylvania & N. Y. C. & R. R. Co., 13g
N. Y. 637; 54 St. Rep. 719.
Snowing.
Wilber v.N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 8 App. Div. 138;
40 Supp. 471.
Unclassified — pedestrians — infants.
Child fell. Could have stopped train if it had had patent
brakes.
Costello v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 65 Barb. 92;
appeal dismissed 55 N. Y. 641.
Girl of 11 years.
Byrne v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 14 Hun, 322; rev.
“83 N. Y. 620; applied 123 N. Y. 650, and 33 St. Rep.
604, and 3 Silv. 184; 94 N. Y. 12; 5 St. Rep. 722; 25
Week. Dig. 14; 104 N. Y. 362; dist. r11 N. Y. 327,
and 19 St. Rep. 355; dist. 123 N. Y. 502, and 34 St.
Rep. 373; followed 15 Daly, 49, and 19 St. Rep. 908,
and 2 Supp. 718.
Boy of 64 years.
Gorham v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Cai aasenis 449.
Girl 9 years old.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 405
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Unclassified — pedestrians — infants.
Cohn v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 6 App. Div. 196;
39 Supp. 986.
Boy. Headlight seen; thought locomotive was not moving.
Henavie v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 10 App. Div.
64; 75 St. Rep. 306; 41 Supp. 935; 154 N. Y. 278.
Unclassified — unclassified.
Griffin v. N. ¥. C. R. R. Co., 2 Alb. L. J. 458.
Phillips v. Troy & B. R. R. Co., 25 Week. Dig. 216.
Kelly v. Long Island R. R. Co., 47 N. Y. 657.
Madden v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 47 N. Y. 665.
Levy v. Great Western R. R. Co., 48 N. Y. 675.
Welch v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 53 N. Y. 610.
Calligan v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 59 N. Y. 651;
dist. 44 St. Rep. 350, and 18 Supp. 313.
Hackford v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 6 Lans. 381;
43 How. Pr. 222; 13 Abb. Pr. N. S. 18; aff'd 53 N. Y.
654.
McGrill v. L.S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 1 T. & C, Adden. 18;
aff'd 66 N. Y. 617.
Keese v. N. Y..N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 67 Barb. 205.
McCarthy v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 76 N. Y. 592:
McKeever v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 88 N. Y. 667.
Semel v. N. Y., N. H. & H.R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 321; 14
Week. Dig. 24; 91 N. Y. 657.
Hewett v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 3 Lans. 83.
Bunn v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 6 Hun, 303.
M. Cook v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 10 Hun, 426;
followed 50 Hun, 28, and 18 St. Rep. 692, and 2 Supp.
470.
Kelsey v. Jewett, 28 Hun, 51; 34 Hun, 11; followed 22
J. & S. 148, and 8 St. Rep. 89.
Doyle v. Long Island R. R. Co., 33 Hun, 37.
Brown v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 45 Hun, 439; 12 St.
Rep. 446; 16 St Rep. 456; 1 Supp. 286; 28 Week.
Dig. 472; aff'd 121 N. Y. 669.
Blaiser v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R.R. Co., 17 St. Rep. 145;
110 N. Y. 638.
406 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVER AT CROSSING.
Unclassified — unclassified.
Fitzgerald v. Long Island R. R. Co., 21 St. Rep. 942;
3 Supp. 230; aff'd 117 N. Y. 653.
Lewis v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 24 St. Rep. 435;
5 Supp. 313; 1 Silv. 393; aff'd 34 St. Rep. 373, and
123 N. Y. 496.
Daniels v. Staten Island R. T. Co., 7 Supp. 728; 28 St.
Rep. 87; rev. 35 St. Rep. 435, and 125 N. Y. 407.
Austin v. Staten Island R. T. Co., 39 St. Rep. 76; 14
Supp. 923.
M. Miller v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 40 St. Rep.
987; 17 Supp. 599; 48 St. Rep. 23; 20 Supp. 163.
Weed v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 91 Hun, 293; 71
St. Rep. 113; 36 Supp. 98.
Zoliewski v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 1 Misc. 438;
51 St. Rep. 54; 21 Supp. 916; aff'd 55 St. Rep. 929,
and 140 N. Y. 621.
Cain v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 20 Misc. 459;.
79 St. Rep. 538; 45 Supp. 538.
RUN OVERS ON TRACK.
Saving life.
Eckert v. Long Island R. R. Co., 57 Barb. 555; aff'd 43
N. Y. 502; explained 73 N. Y. 602.
Spooner v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 1 St. Rep. 558; aff'd
23 St. Rep. 554, and 115 N. Y. 22.
Burnes v. Staten Island R. T. Co., 44 St. Rep. 271; 17
Supp. 741.
Unloading at switch track.
Ran over team getting coal.
Gongden v. D. & H. C. Co., 15 Week. Dig. 24.
Backed into horses.
Hollender v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 6 St. Rep. 352; 19 Abb.
N.C. 18; 14 Daly, 2109.
Loading horses; train backed against car.
Stinson v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 32 N. Y. 3333
dist. 62 Hun, 590, and 42 St. Rep. 580, and 17 Supp.
302; dist. 4g N. Y. 263.
Servant of grain firm; cars to boat. Train suddenly started.
‘
RAILROADS — STEAM. 407
RUN OVERS ON TRACK.
Unloading at switch track
Barton v. N. Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 1 T. & C. 297;
56 N. Y. 660; dist. 62 Hun, 590, and 42 St. Rep. 580,
and 17 Supp. 302.
Went between cars to urinate.
Toomey v. Turner, 24 Hun, 599.
Coal cars; another train backed into them.
Busch v. Buffalo Creek R. R. Co., 29 Hun; 112.
Climbed into coal car to see how much left; train ran into car.
Murphy v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 62 Hun, 587;
42 St. Rep. 580; 17 Supp. 302. ’
Lumber fell on man unloading car for consignee.
Hulse v. N. Y.,O. & W. R. R. Co., 71 Hun, 40; 54 St.
Rep. 66; 24 Supp. 512.
Servant of flour merchant “ pinching” car; train backed down.
Conlan v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 74 Hun, 115; 56
St. Rep. 316; 26 Supp. 659; aff'd 148 N. Y. 748.
Shoveling grain; had to pass between cars. Cars forced to-
gether.
Flynn v. Central R. R. of N. J., 27 Abb. N. C. 31; 15
Supp. 328; 20 Civ. Pro. 179; aff’d 2 Misc. 508, and
51 St. Rep. 84, and 22 Supp. 383, and 23 Civ. Pro.
106; rev. 59 St. Rep. 814, and 142 N. Y. 439.
Servant of proprietor of switch moving cars by hand; locomo-
tive backed down.
MclInery v. D. H.C. Co., 82 Hun, 615; 151 N. Y. 411.
Working on track.
Servant of contractor for defendant.
Young v. N. Y.C. R. R. Co., 13 Daly, 294; Daily Reg.
15 July, 1885; 30 Barb. 229; aff’d 103 N. Y. 678.
Servant of contractor to dig trench.
Collins v. N. Y..N H. & H.R. R. Co., 8 St. Rep. 164;
23 J. & S. 31; aff'd 112 N. Y. 665.
Servant of Bridge Company painting.
Pollitt v. Kings County El. R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep. 954;
10 Supp. 691; aff'd 126 N. Y. 630.
Employee of contractor for defendant ordered under platform.
Germann v. Suburban R. T. Co., 37 St. Rep. 360; 13
408 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVERS ON TRACK.
Working on track.
Supp. 897; aff'd 128 N. Y. 681; dist. 44 St. Rep. 378,
and 17 Supp. 352.
Servarit of contractor repairing station for defendant, passing
through broken train to tool car, was crushed.
‘Dempsey v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 81 Hun, 156;
1 62 St. Rep. 686; 30 Supp. 724; 66 St. Rep. 651; 146
N. Y. 290.
Sentinel guarding R. R. property during strike.
O’Harra v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 92 Hun, 56; 71
St. Rep. 763; 36 Supp. 567; aff'd 153 N. Y. 691.
Unclassified — adults.
Trespasser.
Brand v. Schenectady & T. R. R. Co., 8 Barb. 368.
Stepped to other track at signal and run over.
Harty v. Central R. R. of N. J., 42 N. Y. 468.
Trespasser.
“McKenna v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 8 Daly, 304;
g Daly, 262; dist. 15 Daly, 380, and 27 St. Rep. Sor,
and 7 Supp. 666.
Wind blowing.
Kenney v. N. Y. & Manhattan B. Ry. Co., 13 Week.
Dig. 61.
Did not use crosswalk.
Lynn v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 24 Week. Dig. 98.
Switched car.
McCarty v. D. & H.C. Co., 17 Hun, 74.
No fence; crossing track. —
Winslow v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 11 St. Rep. 831.
Used tracks to get to dwellings owned by defendant; no other
way. Dark night; loccmotive backing.
McDermott v. N. Y. C.& H. R. R. R. Co., 28 Hun,
325; 8 Week. Dig. 531; 97 N. Y. 654.
Found dead. >
Gardinier v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R.R. Co., 3 St. Rep. 693;
25 Week. Dig. 53; 1 Silv. 195; 103 N. Y. 674.
Jumped down embankment.
Remer v. Long Island R. R. Co., 36 Hun, 253; aff’d
RAILROADS — STEAM. 499
RUN OVERS ON TRACK.
Unclassified — adults.
113 N. Y. 669; 48 Hun, 352; 15 St. Rep. 884; 1 Supp.
124; aff'd 23 St. Rep. 994, and 113 N. Y. 669.
Engine backed; at night.
Wiwirowski v. L. S. & M.S. Ry. Co., 58 Hun, 40; 33
St. Rep. 666; 11 Supp. 361; rev. 36 St. Rep. 405, and
124 N. Y. 420.
Alighting from locomotive on near track of other railroad.
J. S. Smith v. N.Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 44 St. Rep.
55; 17 Supp. 400; aff’d 50 St. Rep. 933, and 137 N. Y.
562.
Crossing bridge.
White v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 42 St. Rep. 24; 16
Supp. 788; 47 St. Rep. 174; 20 Supp. 6.
Trespasser.
Adams v. N. Y., L. E. & W.R.R. Co., 49 St. Rep. 854;
21 Supp. 681; 20 Abb. N. C. 180.
Intoxicated; asleep on track. Snowing.
Murch v. Western N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 601;
61 St. Rep. 445; 29 Supp. 490.
Fog.
Scott v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 30 St. Rep. 843; 9
Supp. 189; rev. 41 St. Rep. 712, and 3 Silv. 624, and
130 N. Y. 679.
Crossing track through fence at station.
Riester v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 16 App. Div.
216; 78 St. Rep. 739; 44 Supp. 739.
Passed through parted train to next track.
Ryan v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 269; 68
St. Rep. 260; 24 Supp. 665; 17 App. Div. 221; 79 St.
Rep. 542; 45 Supp. 512.
Unclassified — infants.
Trespasser.
Buckley v. N. Y.& H.R. R.R. Co., 11 J. & S. 187.
Went through defective fence.
Prendegast v.N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 58 N. Y. oe
Allowed at large in street.
Kenyon v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 5 Hun, i
410 RAILROADS — STEAM.
RUN OVERS ON TRACK.
Unclassified — infants.
aff'd 76 N. Y. 607; dist. 46 Hun, 187, and 11 St. Rep.
537, and 27 Week, Dig. 265.
On track.
Davis v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 9 Week. Dig.
522.
Crossing track ; locomotive backing.
Barry v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 11 Week. Dig.
304; 92 N. Y. 289; dist. 123 N. Y. 502, and 34 St.
Rep. 373; followed 104 N. Y. 366, and 5 St. Rep. 722,
and 25 Week. Dig. 514.
In switch yard.
Malone v. B. & A. R. R. Co., 51 Hun, 532; 21 St. Rep.
656; 4 Supp. 590.
Clear view.
Collis v. N. Y. C..& H.R. R. R. Co., 71 Hun, 504; 55
St. Rep. 82; 24 Supp. 10go.
In charge of another.
Meagher v. Cooperstown & C. V. R. R. Co., 75 Hun,
4553 57 St. Rep. 679; 27 Supp. 504.
Trespassing.
Foley v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 78 Hun, 248; 60
St. Rep. 6; 28 Supp. 816.
TURNTABLES.
Child playing.
Walsh v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 67 Hun, 604; 51 St. Rep.
240; 22 Supp. 441; 78 Hun, 1; 60 St. Rep. 539; 28
Supp. 1097; rev. 64 St. Rep. 711, and 145 N. Y. 301.
UNCLASSIFIED.
No facts.
Hunn v. N.Y. C. & H.R. R. R.Co., 74 N. Y. 610.
No facts.
C. W. Miller v. N.Y. C. & H.R. R. R. Co. 99 N. Y.
657.
Evidence of damage.
Lockwood v N. Y., L. E. & W.R.R. Co., 34 Hun, 633;
rev. 95 N. Y. 660; aff'd 98 N. Y. 523; followed 65,
Hun, 552, and 48 St..Rep. 916, and 20 Supp. 477.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 4II
UNCLASSIFIED.
Evidence.
Hagenlocher v. Coney I. & M. B. R. R. Co., 99 N. Y.
136; dist. 44 Hun, 14, and 6 St. Rep. 407, and 26
Week. Dig. 234; dist. 48 Hun, 171, and 15 St. Rep.
544; dist. 57 Hun, 256, and 32 St. Rep. 621, and 10
Supp. 774; explained 44 Hun, 122, and 7 St. Rep. 395;
followed 54 Hun, 186, and 26 St. Rep. 871, and 7
Supp. 221.
Can parents of unmarried adult recover?
Isaac v. Denver. & R. G. Ry. Co., 12 Daly, 340; 102
N. Y. 718.
Derailment ; wheel broke.
Brown v. Sharp, 10 Week. Dig. 559.
Moving building across track. Asked defendant to notify
train. No notice. Delay. Run into.
Garrity v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 16 Week.
Dig. 292.
Boy of 14 years; $5,000 verdict.
Strohm v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 32 Hun, 20;
96 N. Y. 305; see 105 N. Y. 617; applied 44 Hun, 15,
and 6 St. Rep. 407, and 26 Week. Dig. 234; applied
25 St. Rep. 385, and 6 Supp. 242; applied 29 St. Rep.
108, and 8 Supp. 455; applied 36 St. Rep. 730, and 12
Supp. 922; dist. 109 N. Y. 309, and 15 St. Rep. 93,
and 28 Week. Dig 479; dist. 115 N. Y. 63, and 23 St.
Rep. 729; dist. 118 N. Y. 87, and 27 St. Rep. 865; dist.
128 N. Y. 581, and 38 St. Rep. 441, and 3 Silv. 478;
dist. 50 Hun, 28, and 18 St. Rep. 692, and 2 Supp.
470; dist. 6 St. Rep. 50; dist. 26 St. Rep. 640, and 7
Supp. 249; dist. 29 St. Rep. 823, and 8 Supp. 811; ex-
plained 116 N. Y. 467, and 27 St. Rep. 549; followed
105 N. Y. 617, and 1 Silv. 371, and 6 St. Rep. 447, and
26 Week. Dig. 72: followed 43 Hun, 424; followed 49
Hun, 323, and 17 St. Rep. 559, and 2 Supp. 137; fol-
lowed 52 Hun, 113, and 23 St. Rep. 388, and 4 Supp.
848; followed 55 Hun, 306, and 28 St. Rep. 726, and
8 Supp. 525; followed 57 Hun, 103, and 32 St. Rep.
214, and 10 Supp. 432; followed 13 Daly, 384; har-
monized 17 St. Rep. 355, and 1 Supp. 711.
412 RAILROADS — STEAM.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Hit boy; only question could mother recover.
Kennedy v. N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 35 Hun, 186.
Could defendant be sued?
Latham v. B., H. T. & W. R. R. Co., 38 Hun, 265.
No facts. .
Clark v. N, Y.C. & H. R. R. RB. Co., 11g N. ¥,. 670.
No fence; could not use field for pasture.
Leggett v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 41 Hun, 80; 2 St.
Rep. 312. :
Evidence.
Griswold v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 44 Hun, 236;
7 St. Rep. 804; 26 Week. Dig. 358; aff'd 23 St. Rep.
729, and 115 N. Y. 61; applied 26 St. Rep. 640, and
7 Supp. 249; dist. 29 St. Rep. 108, and 8 Supp. 455;
dist. 36 St. Rep. 802, and 13 Supp. 305; followed 118
N. Y. 87, and 27 St. Rep. 865; followed 57 Hun, 103,
and 32 St. Rep. 214, and 10 Supp. 432.
No facts.
E. E. Cook v.N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 17 St. Rep.
353; 1 Supp. 711; aff’d 119 N. Y. 653.
Defendants’ cars on switch track were blown on main track;
collision.
N.Y.,L. E.& W.R.R. Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co., 36
St. Rep. 658; 13 Supp. 466; rev. 42 St. Rep. 346, and
129 N. Y. 597. ‘
Practice.
Bossout v. R., W. & O. R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep. 884; 10
Supp. 602; aff'd 126 N. Y. 646; 42 St. Rep. 391; 131
Na. Xia 375
No facts.
McGuire v. Ogdensburgh & L. C. R. R. Co., 63 Hun,
632; 44 St. Rep. 348; 18 Supp. 313.
Damages.
Swan v. Long Island R. R: Co., 79 Hun, 612; 61 St.
Rep. 28; 29 Supp. 337; 86 Hun, 265; 66 St. Rep. 864;
33 Supp. 190.
No facts.
Tuthill v. Long Island R. R. Co., 75 Hun, 556; 58 St.
Rep. 195; 26 Supp. 1029; 81 Hun, 616; 63 St. Rep.
135; 30 Supp. 959.
RAILROADS — STEAM. 413
UNCLASSIFIED.
Death in another state.
Matter of Degaramo, 86 Hun, 390; 67 St. Rep. 215; 33
Supp. 502.
Damages.
Periv. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 87 Hun, 499; 68 St.
Rep. 844; 34 Supp. 1009; 152 N. Y. 521.
Evidence.
Green v. Middlesex R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 473; 65 St. Rep.
257; 32 Supp. 177; 24 Civ. Pro, 272; 1 Ann. Cas.
167; aff'd 35 Supp. 1107, and go Hun, 607.
Embankment cut off view and threw water on premises.
Mahon v. Utica & S. R. R. Co., Lalor, 156.
RAILROADS—STREET.
ANIMALS RUN OVER.
Ran over dog.
Meisch v. Rochester El. Ry. Co., 72 Hun, 604; 55 St.
Rep. 146; 25 Supp. 244.
Ran over dog.
Dettmers v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 22 App. Div.
488.
COLLISIONS.
With bicycles.
Attempted to cross in front of car at night.
Lurie v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 18 Misc. 81; 75 St.
Rep. 447; 40 Supp. 1129.
With carriages and wagons — crossing track.
Crossing track.
Owen v. Hudson R. R. R. Co., 2 Bosw. 374; 7 Bosw.
329; aff'd 35 N. Y. 516.
Stopped too near track after crossing it.
Spaulding v. Jarvis, 32 Hun, 621; dist. 7 St. Rep. 691.
At crossing; saw car coming.
Buhrens v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 53 Hun,
571; 25 St. Rep. 191; 6 Supp. 224; aff'd 125 N. Y. 702.
414 RAILROADS — STREET.
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — crossing track.
Crossed, and was stopped by a blockade.
Cohen v. Dry Dock, E. B.& B.R. R. Co., 8J. & S. 368;
aft’d 69 N. Y. 170; explained 8 J. & S. 1.
Partly crossed the track.
Gumb v. Twenty-third St. R. R. Co., 21 J. & S. 466;
1 St. Rep. 715; rev. 23 St. Rep. 748, and 114 N. Y.
411; dist. 16 Daly, 251, and 32 St. Rep. 61, and 10
Supp. 105; followed 64 Hun, 466, and 46 St. Rep.
225, and 19 Supp. 644; 26 J. & S. 1, 559; 30 St. Rep.
253, 284; 9 Supp. 316.
Hit by car and thrown out.
Pfeffele v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 34 Hun, 497; 1
Week. Dig. 44.
Crossing track.
Ward v. Rochester El. Ry. Co., 43 St. Rep. 84; 17 Supp.
427; aff'd 57 St. Rep. 866, and 141 N. Y. 561.
At crossing.
Bernhard v. Rochester Ry. Co., 68 Hun, 369; 51 St.
Rep. 880; 22 Supp. 821.
Crossing track.
Wooster v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 72 Hun, 197;
55 ot. Rep. 174; 25 Supp. 378.
Crossing track.
Van Patten v. Schenectady St. Ry. Co., 80 Hun, 494;
62 St. Rep. 378; 30 Supp. sor.
Crossing track.
Witzel v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 3 Misc. 561; 52 St. Rep.
521; 23 Supp. 317; rev. 6 Misc. 635, and 56 St. Rep.
896, and 25 Supp. 1142.
Crossing track.
Zimmerman v. Union Ry. Co., 3 App. Div. 219; 74 St.
Rep. 18; 38 Supp. 362.
Crossing track.
Weldon v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 3 App. Div. 370; 73
St. Rep. 699; 38 Supp. 206.
Passed in front of car.
Hamilton v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 53 N. Y. 25; 6 Misc.
382; 56 St. Rep. 397; 26 Supp. 754; 8 J. & S. 376.
RAILROADS — STREET. 415
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — crossing track.
Crossing track.
Smith v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 15 Misc. 158; 35
Supp. 1062; 7 App. Div. 253; 74 St. Rep. 706; 40
Supp. 148.
Crossing track.
Reynolds v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 8 Misc. 313; 59 St.
Rep. 276; 28 Supp. 734.
Crossing track.
Riegelman v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Misc. 51; 59 St.
Rep. 667; 29 Supp. 299.
Drove horse across track.
Campbell v. Union Ry. Co., 9 Misc. 484; 61 St. Rep. 89;
30 Supp. 246.
Crossing track.
Neudoerffer v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 9 App. Div.
66; 75 St. Rep. 507; 41 Supp. 50.
In front of car. 7
Meyer v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 11; 30
Supp. 534; 9 App. Div. 79; 75 St. Rep. 552; 41 Supp.
92.
Crossing track.
McGrath v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 App. Div. 141; 75
St. Rep. 554; 41 Supp. 93.
Crossing track.
Mackie v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 4; 62 St.
Rep. 653; 30 Supp. 539.
Crossing track.
Rohe v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 740; 64 St. Rep.
500 ; 31 Supp. 797.
Crossing track.
Nicholsbury v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 11 Misc. 432;
65 St. Rep. 273; 32 Supp. 130.
In front of car.
Kelly v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 12 Misc. 568; 67
St. Rep. 604; 33 Supp. 851.
Crossing track.
Roth v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 13 Misc. 213; 68 St.
Rep. 113; 34 Supp. 232.
416
Wit
RAILROADS — STREET.
COLLISIONS.
h carriages and wagons — crossing track.
Standing on track waiting for gate to open into yard.
McGrane v. Flushing & C. P. E. Ry. Co., 13 App. Div.
177; 77 St. Rep. 385; 43 Supp. 385.
In rear of one car which just: passed ; hit by other car.
Boston & P. D. E. Co. v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 14
Misc. 25; 69 St. Rep. 378; 35 Supp. 134; 14 Misc.
571; 35 Supp. 1103.
At intersecting street.
Chapman v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 384; 70
St. Rep. 753; 35 Supp. 1045.
At crossing.
Degnan v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 388; 70
St. Rep. 755; 35 Supp. 1047.
Crossing track.
Schoenholtz v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 461; 70
St. Rep. 773; 36 Supp. 11; rev. 16 Misc. 7, and 73 St.
Rep. 263, and 37 Supp. 682.
At street crossing.
Reilly v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 445; 70 St. Rep.
7333 35 Supp. 1030; aff'd 16 Misc. 11, and 73 St. Rep.
289, and 37 Supp. 593.
Crossing track.
McDonald v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 16 Misc. 52; 73 St.
Rep. 233; 37 Supp. 639.
Crossing track.
McCormack v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 16 App. Div.
24; 78 St. Rep. 684; 44 Supp. 684.
Crossing track.
Coyle v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 17 Misc. 282; 75 St. Rep.
449; 40 Supp. 362; rev. 18 Misc. 9, and 40 Supp.
* 1131; 19 Misc. 345; 77 St. Rep. 499; 43 Supp. 499.
Crossinoe track.
Kilbane v. Westchester E. R. R. Co., 19 Misc. 184.
At cross street.
Cass v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 20 App. Div. sor.
At crossing.
Dise v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 22 Mise. 97.
At crossine,
Huber v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 22 App. Div. 426.
RAILROADS — STREET. 417
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — crossing track.
At street intersection; hit by car on second track.
Reardon v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 24 App. Div. 163.
With carriages and wagons — driving on track.
Struck when turning off track.
Hegan v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 15 N. Y. 380; dist. 16
App. Div. 85, and 79 St. Rep. 110,’and 45 Supp. 110;
dist. 3 St. Rep. 184.
Struck while attempting to get off track.
Adolph v. Central P.. N. & E.R. R. R. Co, 1 J. & S.
186; rev. 65 N. Y. 554; 11 J. & S. 199; aff'd 76 N. Y.
530.
Driving on track.
Donnelly v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 29;
28 Week. Dig. 250; 109 N. Y. 16.
Rider thrown.
Berke v. Twenty-third St. Ry. Co., 22 St. Rep. 492; 4
Supp. 905.
Driving on track.
Moroney v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 30 St. Rep. g11;
9 Supp. 546.
Turned out to let car pass.
Quinn v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 34 St. Rep. 801; 12
Supp. 223; aff'd 45 St. Rep. 935, and 134 N. Y. 611.
Car approached from behind.
Clancy v. Troy & L. R. R. Co., 88 Hun, 496; 68 St. Rep.
789 ; 34 Supp. 877.
Driving on track.
Kessler v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 3 App. Div.
426; 74 St. Rep. 140; 38 Supp. 799.
Hit in rear.
Meade v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 3 App. Div.
432; 39 Supp. 320.
Driving on track.
Witte v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 4 Misc. 286; 53 St.
Rep. 334; 23 Supp. 1028; aff’d 63 St. Rep. 867, and
143 N. Y. 667.
[27]
418
RAILROADS — STREET.
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — driving on track.
Driving on track.
Winter v. Crosstown St. Ry. Co., 8 Misc. 362; 59 St.
Rep. 598; 28 Supp. 695. ,
Driving on track.
Arnesen v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 9 Misc. 270; 61
St. Rep. 324; 29 Supp. 748; aff'd 149 N. Y. 590.
Turning off the track.
Kerr v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 264; 63 St-
Rep. 310; 30 Supp. 1070; aff’d 151 N. Y. 656.
Tried to get off the track.
McConnell v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 11 Misc. 177; 65,
St. Rep. 170; 32 Supp: 114.
Drove on track.
Winch v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 12 Misc. 403; 67 St.
Rep. 322; 33 Supp. 615; 14 Misc. 642; 70 St. Rep.
897; 35 Supp. 1119.
Driving on track.
Ejifinger v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 3 Misc. 389;
68 St. Rep. 118; 34 Supp. 239.
Driving on track.
Simpson v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 645 ;
70 St. Rep. 469; 35 Supp. 674. .
Driving on track. .
Fishback v. Steinway Ry. Co., 11 App. Div. 152; 76 St.
Rep. 883; 42 Supp. 883.
Driving on track.
Delaney v. Yonkers R. R. Co., 13 App. Div. 114; 77 St.
Rep. 225; 43 Supp. 225.
Driving on track.
Schron v. Staten Island El. R. R. Co., 16 App. Div. 111
#79 St. Rep. 124; 45 Supp. 124.
Driving on track.
Murphy v. Nassau El. R. R. Co., 19 App. Div. 583.
Driver behind car turned upon other track and hit.
Baumann v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 21 Misc. 658.
With carriages and wagons — horses frightened.
Steam of dummy frightened horse; backed into car.
Stamm v. Southern R. R. of L. I, 1 Abb. N.C. 438.
RAILROADS — STREET. 419
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — horses frightened.
Driver lost control of horse ; backed wagon on track.
Strauss v. Newburgh El. Ry. Co., 6 App. Div. 264; 39
Supp. 998.
Backed wagon on track.
Geipel v. Steinway Ry. Co., 14 App. Div. 551; 77 St.
Rep. 934; 43 Supp. 934.
Horse balked; crossing after one car had passed.
Bresky v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 16 App. Div. 83; 79 St.
Rep. 108; 45 Supp. 108.
With carriages and wagons — unclassified.
Load of hay in front of plaintiff. Freight car with no light,
flag, whistle or bell.
McGuire v. H. R. R. R. Co., 2 Daly, 76.
Wagon left in street by driver.
Albert v. Bleecker St. Ry. Co., 2 Daly, 389; explained
6 Daly, 212; dist. 17 St. Rep. 108, and 1 Supp. 662,
and 28 Week. Dig. 563.
No signal or light on train ; left wagon to feel his way.
Johnson v. H. R. R. R. Co., 5 Duer, 21; 6 Duer, 633;
aff'd 20 N. Y. 65; approved 2 Abb. C. A. D. 460; ex-
plained and followed 23 Hun, 75; followed 22 N. Y.
209; limited 58 N. Y. 451: 49 N. Y. 455; applied 62
Hun, 502, and 42 St. Rep. 836, and 16 Supp. 894.
Hit by car.
Weyant v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 3 Duer, 360.
Collision.
Burgess v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co., 13 Week. Dig. 499.
Collision.
Wilbrand v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 3 Bosw. 314; criti-
cised 1 J. & S. 186.
Horses iust unhitched from car.
Weldon v. Harlem R. R. Co., 5 Bosw. 576.
Collision.
Schular v. H. R. R. R. Co., 38 Barb. 653. i
Pulled too far to left; alongside of car.
Suvdam v. Grand St. & N. R. R. Co., 41 Barb. 375; 17
Abb. Pr. 304.
420 RAILROADS — STREET.
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — unclassified. -
Horse collided with horse. Practice on appeal from Justices
Court.
Hinkley v. Troy & A. H. R..R. Co., 42 Hun, 281.
Backed on track by street cleaner.
Fleckenstein v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 21
Week. Dig. 128; aff'd 1 Silv. 447; 8 St. Rep. 32; 26
Week. Dig. 32; 105 N. Y. 655.
Threw plaintiff on horseback.
O’Neill v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 71 Hun, 114;
54 St. Rep. 295; 24 Supp. 638.
Cab stopped on track to receive directions.
Mullen v. Central P., N. & E.R. R.R. Co., 1 Misc. 216;
49 St. Rep. 80; 21 Supp. tor.
Horse standing in street.
O’Neill v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 3 Misc. 521.
Infant,
Metcalfe v. Rochester Ry. Co., 12 App. Div. 147; 76 St.
Rep. 661; 42 Supp. 661.
Cellision.
Blate v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 16 App. Div. 287; 78 St.
Rep. 615; 44 Supp. 615.
Ice cart.
McCormack v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 16 App. Div.
24; 78 St. Rep. 684; 44 Supp. 684; 18 App. Div. 333.
Collision.
Kerr v. Union Ry. Co., 20 Misc. 171.
Trucks obstructed crossing.
Nolan v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R. R. Co., 20 Misc. 619;'40
St. Rep. 848; 16 Supp. 826.
Collision.
Hunter v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 20 Misc. 432; 79 St.
Rep. 1044; 45 Supp. 1044; 21 Misc. 1.
Carriage standing at curb.
Tarler v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 21 Misc. 684.
Collision.
Villiers v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 22 Mise. 17.
Coming out of cellar and turned.
Walsh v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 23 App. Div. 19.
s
RAILROADS — STREET. ‘421
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — unclassified.
Wagon backed up against curb; driver climbed over hub of
front wheel without looking at car in sight.
Crowley v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 24 App. Div. 1o1.
RUN OVERS.
At crosswalk — adults.
Baxter v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 3 Robt. 510; 30 How.
Pr. 219; approved 1 J. & S. 182, and 1 J. & S. 186.
Unger v. Forty-second St. R. R. Co., 6 Robt. 237; aff'd
51 N. Y. 497.
O'Donnell v. N. Y. & H. R. R. R. Co., 8 Daly, 409;
aff'd 77 N. Y. 625.
Harnett v. Bleecker St. R. R. Co., 17 J. & S. 185.
McDermott v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 44 Hun, 107; 8 St.
Rep. 458; 26 Week. Dig. 250; aff’d 115 N. Y. 670.
Rhing v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 53 Hun, 321; 25
St. Rep. 563; 6 Supp. 641.
Cowan v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 16 St. Rep. 916; 1
Supp. 612; 28 Week. Dig. 475; 31 St. Rep. 145; 9
Supp. 610; aff'd 132 N. Y. 598.
Ewing v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 34 St. Rep. 113; 11
Supp. 626.
Mitchell v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 70 Hun, 387.
Wells v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 58 Hun, 389; 34 St.
Rep. 636; 12 Supp. 67.
Jager v. Coney I. & B. R. R. Co., 84 Hun, 307; 65 St.
Rep. 539; 32 Supp. 304.
Walk v. Rochester Ry. Co., 92 Hun, 581; 72 St. Rep.
250; 26 Supp. 1102; 154 N. Y. Mem. 41.
Mills v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 1; 62 St. Rep.
645; 30 Supp. 532; aff'd 151 N. Y. 629.
Faurot v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 398;
70 St. Rep. 754; 35 Supp. 1046.
Schulman v. Houston, W. St. & P. F. R. R. Co, 15
Misc. 30; 71 St. Rep. 489; 36 Supp. 439.
Fandel v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 15 App. Div. 426; 78
St. Rep. 462; 44 Supp. 162.
McQuade v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 17 Misc. 154; 39
Supp. 335.
Curtin v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 22 Misc. 83.
Conley v. Albany Ry., 22 App. Div. 321.
422 RAILROADS — STREET.
RUN OVERS.
At crosswalk — infants.
Oldfield v. N. Y. & H, R. R. Co., 3 E. D. Smith, 103;
aff'd 14 N. Y. 310; followed 30 N. Y. 135; followed
79 N. Y. 510; followed 2 Abb. C. A. D. 482; followed
31 Barb. 263; followed 43 Barb. 537.
Mangam v. Brooklyn R. R. Co., 36 Barb. 230; ex-
plained 66 Barb. 43; followed 2 Sw. 93; aff'd 38 N. Y.
455; applied 15 Abb. Pr. N. S. 328; applied 47 N. Y.
322; applied 64 N. Y. 18; applied 43 How. Pr. 410.
Jetter v. N.Y. & H.R. R. Co., 2 Abb. C. A. D. 458; 2
Keyes, 154; followed 6 Daly, 494; limited and dist.
84 N. Y. 488.
Hyland v. Yonkers R. R. Co., 15 St. Rep. 824; 1 Supp.
363; 22 St. Rep. 100; 4 Supp. 305; aff’d 119 N. Y.
612.
Mallard v. Ninth Ave. R. R. Co., 15 Daly, 376; 27 St.
Rep. 801 ;.7 Supp. 666.
Cumming v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 38 Hun, 362;
aff'd 5 St. Rep. 737, and 1 Silv. 345, and 21 Abb. N.C.
1, and 104 N. Y. 669; 24 St. Rep. 718; 5 Supp. 476;
1 Silv. 327.
Young v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 541; 64 St.
Rep. 124; 31 Supp. 441.
Penny v. Rochester Ry. Co., 7 App. Div. 595; 74 St.
Rep. 732; 40 Supp. 172; 154 N. Y. Mem. 4o.
Wihnyk v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 14 App. Div. 515;
77 St. Rep. 1023; 43 Supp. 1023.
Stabenau v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 15 App. Div. 408.
Ellick v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 15 App. Div. 556;
78 St. Rep. 523; 44 Supp. 523.
Ehrmann v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 23 App. Div. 21.
®
In roadway — adults.
Clear view; cars moving slowly.
McGinnis v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 7 Alb. L. J.
172,
Not at crossing.
Healey v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B.R. R. Co, 14 J. & S.
473; 11 Week. Dig. 441.
RAILROADS — STREET. 423
RUN OVERS.
In roadway — adults.
In a procession.
Brown v. Broadway R. R. Co., 18 J. & S. 106.
Slipped on snow.
Markowitz v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 12 Mise.
4i2; 67 St. Rep. 572; 33 Supp. 702.
Same accident.
Friedman v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 3 St. Rep.
5573 33 St. Rep. 649; 11 Supp. 429; aff'd 110 N. Y.
676.
Not at crossing.
Pyne v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 46 St. Rep. 662;
19 Supp. 217; aff’d 51 St. Rep. 934, and 138 N. Y. 627.
At the side of his team.
Curry v. Union El. Ry. Co., 86 Hun, 559; 67 St. Rep.
551; 33 Supp. 728.
Crossing diagonally ; did not look behind.
Doller v. Union Ry. Co., 7 App. Div. 283; 39 Supp.
770.
Intestate was lying on the track.
Murray v. Forty-Second St. R. R. Co., 9 App. Div.
610; 75 St. Rep. 1015; 41 Supp. 620.
Stepped back to avoid one car; run over by the other.
McCormick v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 8; 62
St. Rep. 647; 36 Supp. 529; aff'd 150 N. Y. 584.
In roadway — infants.
Boy of 8 years.
Baker v. Rochester City R. R. Co., 24 Week. Dig. 119.
Boy of 5 years.
Pendril v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 2 J. & S. 481; 43
How. Pr. 399.
Boy of 8. Unusual speed.
Squire v. Central P., N.& E.R. RR. Co., 4 J. & S.
436.
Infant of 2 with sister of 3.
Smith v. Grand St. R. R. Co., 11 Abb. N. C. 62.
Girl of 2 vears.
Bulger v. Albany Ry. Co., 42 N. Y. 459.
424
RAILROADS — STREET.
RUN OVERS.
In roadway — infants.
Boy of 6 years playing in sand in street.
Burke v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 49 Barb. 529;
34 How. Pr. 239. i
Girl under 5 years.
Ames v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 24 St. Rep.
818; 4 Supp. 803; 24 J. & S. 3; aff'd 122 N. Y. 643.
Girl of 6; no conductor; driver looking at rear of car.
Agnew v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 9 St. Rep. 719; 13
Civ. Pro. 25; 20 Abb. N. C. 235; 24 St. Rep. 744; 5
Supp. 756; aff'd 117 N. Y. 651.
Boy of 7 years.
Block v. Harlem B. & M. R. R. Co., 28 St. Rep. 495;
g Supp. 164; declared overruled 20 Supp. 803.
Boy of 44 years.
Schoen v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 31 St. Rep.
400; 9 Supp. 709; 26 J. & S. 149.
Boy of 9 years.
Fenton v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 56 Hun, 99; 29 St.
Rep. 962; 9 Supp. 162; rev. 36 St. Rep. 385, and 126
N. Y. 625; applied 20 Supp. 803.
Infant of 3.
Ehrman v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 38 St. Rep. 990; 14
Supp. 336; aff'd 131 N. Y. 576.
Girl of 3 years.
Giraldo v. Coney Island & B. R. Co., 42 St. Rep.
915; 16 Supp. 774; 48 St. Rep. 931; 135 N. Y. 648.
Infant of 8 years run over.
Baker v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 62 Hun, 39; 41 St.
Rep. 353; 16 Supp. 319.
Infant of g years and 3 months run over.
Trotcky v. Forty-second St. B. R. Co., 73 Hun, 26; 57
St. Rep. 155; 25 Supp. 1054.
Crowd of youngsters were chasing the boy.
Reich v. Union Ry. Co., 78 Hun, 417; 60 St. Rep. 450;
28 Supp. 1105.
Girl of 14 playing in street.
Thompson v. Buffalo Ry. Co., 9 Misc. 726; 31 Supp.
1134; rev. 64 St. Rep. 591, and 145 N. Y. 1096.
RAILROADS — STREET. 425
RUN OVERS.
In roadway — infants.
Child of 5 years.
Ogier v. Albany Ry. Co., 88 Hun, 486; 68 St. Rep.
803 ; 34 Supp. 867.
Child of 5 years.
Huerzeler v. Central C. T. R. R. Co., 1 Misc. 136; 48
St. Rep, 649; 20 Supp. 676; aff'd 139 N. Y. 490, and
‘ 54 St. Rep. 836.
‘Boy of 9 years.
Bello v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 14 Misc. 279; 70 St.
Rep. 252; 35 Supp. 831; aff'd 2 App. Div. 313, and
73 St. Rep. 18, and 37 Supp. 969.
Boy of 6 years.
Mason v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 4 Misc. 291; 53 St.
Rep. 454; 24 Supp. 139; aff'd 55 St. Rep. 931, and
140 N. Y. 657.
Verdict of 6 cents.
Coghlan v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 16 Misc. 677; 25 Civ.
Pro. Rep. 249; 39 Supp. 113; aff'd 7 App. Div. 124,
and 39 Supp. 1098.
Girl ot 4 years.
Jones v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 543; 64
St. Rep. 22; 31 Supp. 445; 15 Misc. 690; 70 St. Rep.
904; 36 Supp. 1127.
Ran backwards over boy trying to rise.
Bittner v. Crosstown Ry. Co., 12 Misc. 514; 67 St. Rep.
367 ; 33 Supp. 672; rev. 153 N. Y. 76.
Boy of 6 vears.
Muller v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 18 App. Div.
177; 79 St. Rep. 954; 45 Supp. 954.
Boy of 14 getting ball on track.
Volkommer v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 23 App. Div.
88.
Boy of 10 darted suddenly in front of car and fell.
Kitay v. Brooklyn, Q. C. & S. R. R. Co., 23 App. Div.
228.
Boy of 5 playing in street recrossed suddenly.
Howell v. Rochester Ry. Co., 24 App. Div. 502.
426 RAILROADS — STREET. :
RUN OVERS.
Frightened horses.
Ran over pedestrian crossing street. ‘
Weldon v. Harlem R. R. Co., 5 Bosw. 576.
Horses got loose from car and ran over pedestrian on sidewalk.
Black v. Forty-second St. R. R. Co., 19 Week. Dig. 24.
Horses on way to stable; frightened by steam of L road.
Choate v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 2 Month. L. Bul. 4o.
Horse ran towards woman, but did not hit her.
Lehman v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 47 Hun, 355; 14
St. Rep. 575; 28 Week. Dig. 48.
Driver dropped whiffitree or a blast frightened horses; ran into
wagon.
Lynch v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 24 St. Rep. 447; 5
Supp. 311; 1 Silv. 361; rev. 123 N. Y. 657.
Boy of 9 years.
Dintruff v. Rochester City & B. R. R. Co., 32 St. Rep.
730; 10 Supp. 402; aff’d 124 N. Y. 647.
Team escaped from drivers; ran over plaintiff on sidewalk.
Lyons v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 89 Hun, 374; 69 St.
Rep. 816; 35 Supp. 372; 2 Ann. Cas. 402; aff'd 152
N. Y. 654.
Infant of 7 years.
Benoit v. Troy & L. R. R. Co., 77 Hun, 576; 60 St.
Rep. 451; 28 Supp. 1024; 9 App. Div. 622; 154 N. Y.
223.
Working in street.
Car struck pipe, which fell on man in trench.
Schmidt v. Steinway & H. P. R. R. Co., 55 Hun, 496;
2g St. Rep. 201 ; 8 Supp. 664; 9 Supp. 939; 32 St. Rep.
giz; 10 Supp. 672; rev. 43 St. Rep. 683, and 132 N.
Y. 566.
Working®in trench near track.
McCooey v. Forty-second St. R. R. Co., 79 Hun, 255;
61 St. Rep. 34; 29 Supp. 368
Car hit pipe which hit man in trench.
Lahey v.. Central F., N. & E.R. R, R. Co,, 2 Mise, 93°74
51 St. Rep. 589: 22 Supp. 380.
Working at rear of coal wagon.
McKelvey v. Twenty-third St. Ry. Co., 5 Misc. 424; 26
Supp. 711.
RAILROADS — STREET. 427
RUN OVERS.
Working in street.
Working in drain; removing plank to prevent wreck.
Morrissey v. Westchester El. Ry. Co., 18 App. Div. 67;
79 St. Rep. 444; 45 Supp. 444.
Car flying over trench; horses driven around. Horse slipped
into trench. Man in trench dodged horse and killed by car.
Burns v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 21 App. Div. 521.
Unclassified — adults.
Driver testified that brake was out of order.
Luby v. H. R. R. R. Co., 17 N. Y. 131; applied 2 Daly,
414; applied 30 Hun, 276.
Intestate had been drinking.
Button v. H. R. R. R. Co., 18 N. Y. 248; examined 40
Barb. 209; applied 65 Barb. 152; applied 32 Barb.
152; applied 33 Barb. 416; examined 19 How. Pr.
203.
Fell in front of car.
Monty v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 1 Alb. L. J. 99.
Plaintiff's wife.
Mooney v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 2 City Ct. 366.
Wilful run over; thrown into excavation near track.
Whitaker v. Eighth Ave. R. R. Co., 5 Robt. 650; rev.
51 N. Y. 295.
Three feet from track ; driver swerved horses.
Whittaker v. N. Y. & H.R. R. Co., 19 J. & S. 287; 11
Civ. Pro. 189; 22 J. & S. 8; 18 Abb. N. C. 11; dist.
22 J. & S. 481; reviewed 34 St. Rep. 145, and 12
Supp. 111.
Standing between tracks.
Watson v. Broadway & Seventh Ave. R. R. Co., 6 St.
Rep. 538; 26 Week. Dig. 3373 18 St. Rep. 1029
Thrown into box near track.
Brown v. Twenty-third St. R. R. Co., 24 J. & S. 356; 21
St. Rep. 475; 4 Supp. 192; aff’d 30 St. Rep. 1014, and
121 N. Y. 667.
Driver accelerated speed.
McClain v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 6 St. Rep. 49;
aff'd 27 St. Rep. 549, and 116 N. Y. 459; followed
118 N. Y. 87, and 27 St. Rep. 865.
428 RAILROADS — STREET.
RUN OVERS.
Unelassified — adults.
Car derailed at switch and thrown against plaintiff.
Wolz v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 36 St. Rep.
328; 13 Supp. 129 :
Ran over R. R. flagman; his back to car.
D’Oro v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 37 St. Rep. 411; 13
Supp. 789; aff'd 129 N. Y. 632.
Evidence.
Lewke v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 46 Hun,
283; 11 St. Rep. 510; disapproved 57 Hun, 256, and
32 St. Rep. 621, and 10 Supp. 774; followed 54 Hun,
188, and 26 St. Rep. 871, and 7 Supp. 221.
Car just passed.
Scott v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 59 Hun, 456; 36 St. Rep.
838; 13 Supp. 344; 41 St. Rep. 152; 16 Supp. 350.
Horses were galloping
-Lang v. Houston, W. S. & P. F. R. R. Co., 75 Hun,
151; 58 St. Rep. 594; 27 Supp. 90; aff'd 144 N. Y.
Ave
Evidence as to rate of speed.
Pender v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 84 Hun, 460; 65
St. Rep. 573; 32 Supp. 366.
Car just passed.
Curry v. Rochester Ry. Co., 90 Hun, 230; 70 St. Rep.
146; 35 Supp. 543.
View obstructed by wagon; sudden start of car.
McGuire v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 App. Div. 529; 75
St. Rep. 968; 41 Supp. 577.
Proximate cause of death.
Weber v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 12 App. Div. 512; 76
St. Rep. 789; 42 Supp. 789.
Hernia; nogevidence of none before the accident.
Schwanzer v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 18 App.
Div. 205; 79 St. Rep. 889; 45 Supp. 889.
Horse hit by car; ran away; threw driver out on track, where
he was run over by another car.
McKeon v. Steinway Ry. Co., 20 App. Div. 601.
RAILROADS —— STREET, 429
RUN OVERS.
Unclassified — infants.
Boy of 24 years.
Pascoshell v, Twenty-Third St. R. R. Co., 23 Week.
Dig. 200.
Boy of 64 years Jell on track,
llonegsberger v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 1 Daly,.89;
rev, 33 Llow. Fr. 195; 1 Keyes, 570; 2 Abb. C. A. D.
378; overruled 60 N, Y. 326; dist. and overruled 38
St. Rep. 990; 14 Supp. 338.
Boy of 8 years.
Mentz v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 2 Robt. 356; aff'd 3
Abb, C. A. D. 274; applied 8 Daly, 4og.
In freight depot obeying call of nature.
Lehey v. Il. R. R. R. Co., 4 Robt. 204.
Fell on track ; child of 3 years in charge of child of 9} years.
Ih! v. Forty-Second St. R. R. Co., 47 N. Y. 317; 2 Alb.
L, J. 416; followed 58 Hun, 510, and 35 St. Rep. 796,
and 12 Supp. 612; followed 23 Hun, 449; followed 52
N. Y. 630.
Boy fell from wagon on track.
Bahrenburgh y. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 56 N. Y. 652.
Boy between 5 and 6 years.
Aaron v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 2 Daly, 127.
Boy of 7 years, with other boys, dashed in front of car.
Thurber v. II. ., M. & F. R. R. Co., 60 N. Y. 326; dist.
59 Tun, 458, and 36 St. Rep. 838, and 13 Supp. 344;
followed 38 St. Rep. g90, and 14 Supp. 338; applied
12 J. & S. 45.
Evidence,
llageerty v. Brooklyn City & N. R. R. Co., 61 N.Y.
624.
Boy of § years.
Tallon y. Central P., N. & E.R. R. R. Co, 6 Daly, 8;
aff'd 64 N. Y. 13:67 N.Y. 52.
Child of 2 years.
lalotio v. Broadway R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 243.
Declaratons of conductor.
Furst v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 72 N. Y. 842: dist. 120
N. Y, 164, and 30 St. Rep. 779; dist. 13 Week. Dig.
335; dist. 83 N. Y. 408.
430 RAILROADS — STREET.
RUN OVERS.
Unclassified — infants.
Boy of 12 running alongside of car. Driver struck at him with
whip, which caught and threw him under car.
Ryan v. H.R. R.R. Co., 1 J. & S. 137.
Girl of 2 years. 7
Etherington v. Prospect P. & C. I. R. R. Co., 88 N. Y.
641. .
Boy of 8 years tried to cross in front of car.
Motel v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co., 2 How. Pr. N. S. 303; 99
N. Y. 632; applied 46 Hun, 188, and 11 St: Rep. 537,
and 27 Week. Dig. 265; dist. 56 Hun, 102, and 29 St.
Rep. 962, and g Supp. 162.
Element of damage.
Cuming v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 14 St. Rep. 788; 21
Abb. N. C. 1; 28 Week. Dig. 436; 109 N. Y. 95; dist.
51 Hun, 605, and 22 St. Rep. 110, and 4 Supp. 565.
Boy of 10 years.
Dorman v. Broadway R. R. Co., 16 St. Rep. 753; 1
Supp. 334; 25 St. Rep. 100g; 5 Supp. 769; rev. 27 St.
Rep. 841, and 2 Silv..422, and 117 N. Y. 655.
Infant left in yard in charge of elder sister.
Fisselmayer v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 2 St. Rep. 75.
Fell down running from larger boys.
Holmes v. Atlantic Ave. Ry. Co., 16 St. Rep. 743.
Boy run over.
Cordes v. Third Ave. Ry. Co., 21 St. Rep. 461; 4 Supp.
439; 24 J. & S. 319; 23 St. Rep. 201; 1 Supp. 339; 24
J. & S. 570; 4 Supp. 713.
Child ran down incline of temporary sidewalk.
Wright v. Third Ave. Ry. Co., 23 St. Rep. 483; 5 Supp.
707,
Girl of 7 years.
Stone v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 46 Hun, 184;
Ir St. Rep. 537; 27 Week. Dig. 265; rev. 23 St. Rep.
ast, and 115 N. Y. 104; dist. 4 Supp. 846.
Girl of 2 years escaped into street.
Weil v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 25 St. Rep.
698; 5 Supp. 833; 25 J. & S. 833; rev. 28 St. Rep.
944, and 119 N.Y. 147. :
RAILROADS — STREET. 431
RUN OVERS.
Unelassified — infants.
Girl of 4 years in care of father.
Levy v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 35 St. Rep.
769 ; 12 Supp. 485.
Child of 4 years left house without knowledge of mother.
Barry v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 41 St. Rep. 342; 16.
Supp. 518; aff’d 50 St. Rep. 92g, and 136 N. Y. 669;
1 Misc. 502; 49 St. Rep. 705; 20 Supp. 871.
Boy of 10 years fell down on track.
Winterfield v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 49 St. Rep. 435;.
20 Supp. 8or.
Light rain ;-boy of 8 years.
Lennon v. N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 65 Hun, 578; 48
St. Rep. 806; 20 Supp. 557.
Crossing to meet father. Child of 2} years with child of 5,
years.
Martineau v. Rochester Ry. Co., 81 Hun, 263; 62 St.
Rep. 722; 30 Supp. 778; aff'd 146 N. Y. 376.
Boy of 7 years.
Heinz v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 91 Hun, 640; 7r
St. Rep. 623; 36 Supp. 675.
Girl of 8 years.
Bennett v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 1 App. Div.
205; 72 St. Rep. 719; 37 Supp. 447.
Playing in street; boy of 4 years.
Jaquinto v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 2 Misc. 174;
49 St. Rep. 627: 21 Supp. 639.
Girl of 33 years.
Reger v. Rochester Ry. Co., 2 App. Div. 5; 73 St. Rep.
209; 37 Supp. 520.
Girl of 3 years and 4 months.
Albert v. Albany Ry. Co., 5 App. Div. 544; 39 Supp.
430; aff'd 154 N. Y. Mem. 50.
Messenger boy stood between rails to let wagon pass.
Zlotovsky v. Twenty-third St. Ry. Co., 8 Misc. 463; 59
St. Rep. 581; 28 Supp. 661.
Boy of 6 years.
Keenan v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 8 Misc. 601 : 60 St.
Rep. 831; 29 Supp. 325: rev. 64 St. Rep. 813, and 145,
“N.Y. 348.
432 RAILROADS — STREET.
RUN OVERS.
Unclassified — infants.
Boy of 8 years.
Dowd v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 9 Misc. 279; 61
St. Rep. 321; 29 Supp. 745.
Boy of 5 years playing in street.
Timony v. Brooklyn City & N. R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 261;
63 St. Rep. 311; 30 Supp. 1071; aff'd 67 St. Rep.
868, and 145 N. Y. 648.
Girl of 64 years stumbled and fell on track.
Tholen v. Brooklyn City R. R. Co., 10 Misc. 283; 63
St. Rep. 269; 30 Supp. 1081; aff'd 151 N. Y. 627.
Girl of 5 years and g months. Leg exhibited in glass jar.
Rost v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 10 App. Div. 477;
75 St. Rep. 1423; 41 Supp. 1069.
Child fell in front of car.
Lavin v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 12 App. Div. 381; 76
St. Rep. 512; 42 Supp. 512.
Boy of 6 years.
Lhowe v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 14 Misc. 612; 71 St.
Rep. 451; 36 Supp. 463.
Girl of 34 years. ©
Nugent v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 17 App. Div. 582;
79 St. Rep. 596; 45 Supp. 596.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Death of child.
Gowan v. Brooklyn C. T. R. R. Co., 2 Month. L. Bul.
12.
Was judgment in son’s action competent in father’s action?
Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 487; disap-
proved 14 Misc. 644, and 7o St. Rep. 884, and 35
Supp. 1107; disapproved 7 Misc. 14, and 56 St. Rep.
844, and 27 Supp. 336.
Defendant laid track so near sidewalk as to leave no space for
vehicle.
Kellinger v. Forty-second & G. St. R. R. Co., 50 N. Y.
206; applied 121 N. Y. 515, and 31 St. Rep. 828; dist.
128 N. Y. 162, and 4o St. Rep. 392.
Fire hose across track; train cut hose.
Mott v. H. R. R. R. Co., 1 Robt. 585; 8 Bosw. 345.
RAILROADS — STREET. 433
UNCLASSIFIED.
Limitation.
Watson v. Forty-second St. R. R. Co., 16 J. & S. 443 93
N. Y. 522.
Question of damages.
Langley v. Sixth Ave. R. R. Co., 16 J. & S. 542.
Tender.
Taylor v. Brooklyn El. R. R. Co., 27 St. Rep. 44; 7
Supp. 625; 18 Civ. Pro. 72; aff’d 30 St. Rep. 111, and
119 N. Y. 561.
Evidence of injury.
Miley v. Broadway & S. A. R. R. Co., 29 St. Rep. 107; 8
Supp. 455.
Evidence and damages.
Elsas v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 56 Hun, 161; 30 St.
Rep. 414; 9 Supp. 210.
New trial granted.
Mellwitz v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 62 Hun, 622; 43 St.
Rep. 354; 17 Supp. 112; followed 43 St. Rep. 370,
and 17 Supp. 812.
Question of contributory negligence.
Erickson v. Twenty-third St. Ry. Co., 71 Hun, 108; 24
Supp. 603; aff’d 64 St. Rep. 866, and 144 N. Y. 653.
Question of damages.
De Wardener v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 1 App. Div.
240; 72 St. Rep. 741; 37 Supp. 133.
Killed.
Medinger v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 6 App. Div.
42; 39 Supp. 613.
Illegal speed.
City of Brooklyn v. Brooklyn C. & N. R. R. Co., 11
App. Div. 168; 76 St. Rep. 371; 42 Supp. 371.
Expert testimony.
Frankfort v. Mankattan Ry. Co., 12 Misc. 13; 66 St.
Rep. 534; 33 Supp. 36.
Damages.
Levitt v. Nassau El. R. R. Co., 14 App. Div. 83; 77 St.
Rep. 426; 43 Supp. 426.
Driver of Second Ave. car ran into Third Ave. car.
Tyler v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 18 Misc. 165; 75 St. Rep.
913; 41 Supp. 523.
[28]
434 RAILROADS — STREET.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Suing as poor person.
Rosa v. Second Ave. R. R. Co., 20 App. Div. 334.
*
SPORTS AND GAMES.
COASTING.
Bob-sled.
Arthur v. City of Cohoes, 56 Hun, 36; 29 St. Rep. 472;
g Supp. 160; aff'd 134 N. Y. 589.
Toboggan ran into sleigh.
Haden v. Clarke, 32 St. Rep. 478; 10 Supp. 291.
Toboggan slide.
Demarest v. Flack, 16 Daly, 337; 32 St. Rep. 675; 11
Supp. 83; aff'd 4o St. Rep. 383, and 128.N. Y. 205.
Bob-sled.
Toomey v. City of Albany, 38 St. Rep. 91; 14 Supp. 572.
FIRE-ARMS.
Accidentally discharged pistol.
Blin v. Campbell, 14 Johns. 432; applied 18 Johns. 283;
applied 6 Cow. 345.
Defendant left loaded revolver in unlocked bureau drawer
where child was playing
Phillips v. Barnett, 2 City Ct. 20.
Cannon on yacht fired.
Haack v. Fearing, 5 Robt. 528; 35 How. Pr. 459.
Shot at military drill.
Castle v. Duryea, 32 Barb. 480; aff’d 2 Keyes, 169; 1
Abb. C. A. D. 327.
Shot whfle ducking.
Hawkins v. Watkins, 77 Hun, 360; 60 St. Rep. 402; 28
Supp. 867.
FIRE-WORKS.
Explosion of fire-works.
Fillo v. Jones, 4 Keyes, 328; 2 Abb. C. A. D. rar; ex-
plained 80 N. Y. 579.
SPORTS AND GAMES. 435
FIRE-WORKS.
Fire-works.
Wyllie v. Palmer, 63 Hun, 8; 43 St. Rep. 92; 17 Supp.
434; aff'd 50 St. Rep. 706, and 137 N. Y. 248.
House fired by rocket.
Spier v. City of Brooklyn, 139 N. Y. 6.
2 UNCLASSIFIED.
School-mate shot arrow in school-room.
Bullock v. Babcock, 3 Wend. 391; dist. 10 Hun, 560;
relied on 60 How. Pr. 450.
Skating; no fence around cutting.
Sickles v. N. J. Ice Co., 80 Hun, 213; 61 St. Rep. 761;
30 Supp. 10; rev. 153 N. Y. 83.
TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE
COMPANIES
MESSAGES.
Delay.
Bryant v. American T. Co., 1 Daly, 575.
Baldwin v. U. S. Telegraph Co., 54 Barb. 505; 6 Abb.
Pr. N. S. 405; 1 Lans. 125; aff'd 45 N. Y. 744; dist.
51 Hun, 130, and 20 St. Rep. 626, and 5 Supp. 952;
followed 124 N. Y. 265, and 35 St. Rep. 307.
Mowry v. Western U. T. Co., 51 Hun, 126; 20 St. Rep.
626; 4 Supp. 666.
Riley v. Western U. T. Co., 6 Misc. 221; 56 St. Rep.
528; 26 Supp. 532; aff'd 8 Misc. 217, and 59 St. Rep.
227, and 28 Supp. 581.
Curtin v. Western U. T. Co., 14 Misc. 4593 72 St. Rep.
260; 36 Supp. 1111; rev. 16 Misc. 347, and 74 St. Rep.
713, and 38 Supp. 58; 13 App. Div. 253; 76 St. Rep.
1109; 42 Supp. 110g; 3 Ann. Cas. 286.
Will v. Postal T. C. Co., 3 App. Div. 22; 73 St. Rep.
552; 3 N. Y. Ann. Cas. 123; 37 Supp. 933.
Errors. :
Rose v. U. S. Telegraph Co., 6 Robt. 30; 24 How. Pr.
308; 3 Abb. Pr. N. S. 408.
Landsberger v, Magnetic T. Co., 32 Barb. 530; 8 Abb.
Pr. 35.
436
Errors.
TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANIES.
MESSAGES.
Leonard v. N. Y., A. & B. E. M. T. Co., 41 N. Y. 544;
followed 44 N. Y. 263.
Breese v. U. S. Telegraph Co., 45 Barb. 174; dist. 2
Sw. 260; applied 3 J. & S. 337; dist. 1 Lans. 136; 31
How. Pr. 86; aff'd 48 N. Y. 132; followed 2 J. & S.
395; dist. 32 Hun, 4; followed 6 T. & C. 195; criti-
cised 124 N. Y. 267, and 35 St. Rep. 307; criticised
18 St. Rep. 780, and 2 Supp. 365; dist. 44 Hun, 535,
and g St. Rep. 132.
Rittenhouse v. Independent Line of T., 1 Daly, 474;
aff'd 44 N. Y. 265; approved 124 N. Y. 265, and 35
St. Rep. 307; followed 44 Hun, 536, and 9 St. Rep.
132.
De Rutte v. N. Y., A. & B. T. Co., 1 Daly, 547; 30 How.
Pr. 405.
Elwood v. Western U. T. Co., 45 N. Y. 549; applied 1
Abb. N. C. 360; applied 8 Daly, 215; applied 8 Hun,
428; applied 78 N. Y. 291; explained 4 Daly, 534;
dist. 121 N. Y. 692, and 31 St. Rep. 836, and 3 Silv.
46; dist. 9 St. Rep. 245; dist. 12 Supp. 224.
Lowery v. Western U. T. Co., 60 N. Y. 198; dist. 62
Hun, 140, and 41 St. Rep. 747, and 16 Supp. 503.
Elsey v. Postal T. Co., 15 Daly, 58; 20 St. Rep. 97; 3
Supp. 117.
Young v. Western U. T. Co., 2 J. & S. 390; rev. 65
N. Y. 163.
Hart v. Direct U. S. C. Co., 13 Week. Dig. 269; 86 N.
Y. 633; dist. 51 Hun, 130, and 20 St. Rep. 626, and
5 Supp. 952.
Wolskehl v. Western U. T. Co., 46 Hun, 542; 12 St.
Rep. 555: 27 Week. Dig. 425.
Bennett v. Western U. T. Co., 18 St. Rep. 777; 2 Supp.
365.
Dixon v. Western U. T. Co., 3 App. Div. 60; 3 Ann.
Cas. 126; 38 Supp. 1056.
Not delivered.
McColl v. Western U. T. Co., 12 J. & S. 487; 7 Abb.
N. C. 151; dist. 51 Hun, 130, and 20 St. Rep. 626, and
5 Supp. 952.
TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE COMPANIES. 437
MESSAGES.
Not delivered.
Macpherson v. Western U. T. Co., 20 J. & S. 232.
Oregon S. Co. v. Otis, 27 Hun, 452; 14 Abb. N. C.
388; 100 N. Y. 446; followed 4 Supp. 189, and 14
Civ. Pro. 130.
Kiley v. Western U. T. Co., 39 Hun, 158; aff’d 14 St.
Rep. 816, and 109 N. Y. 231; followed 112 N. Y. 411,
and 21 St. Rep. 830.
Milliken v. Western U. T. Co., 21 J. & S. 111; rev. 18
St. Rep. 328, and 110 N. Y. 403.
Pearsall v. Western U. T. Co., 44 Hun, 532; 9 St. Rep.
132; aff'd 35 St. Rep. 307, and 124 N. Y. 256; fol-
lowed 126 N. Y. 120, and 36 St. Rep. 500.
Unclassified.
Failed to send message.
Sprague v. Western U. T. Co., 6 Daly, 200; aff’d 67
N. Y. 590; 7 Abb. N. C. 167.
Failed to send message.
Schwartz v. Atlantic & P. T. Co., 18 Hun, aa
Refused to take message.
Atlantic & P. T. Co. v. Western U. T. Co., 4 Daly, 527.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Janitress tripped on fallen wire on roof while hanging out
clothes.
Walther v. American D. T. Co., 11 Misc. 71; 66 St. Rep.
21; 32 Supp. 751.
VEHICLES.
COLLISIONS.
With bicycles.
Driving in opposite direction.
Schimpf v. Sliter, 64 Hun, 463; 46 St. Rep. 225; 19
Supp. 644.
Drove over wheel left at curb.
Johnson v. Parker, 7 Misc. 695; 58 St. Rep. 332; 28
Supp. 146
438 VEHICLES.
COLLISIONS.
With bicycles.
Riding at side of track.
Sparling “v. Wack, 13 Misc. 261; 68 St. Rep. 11; 34
Supp. 55.
Untied horse.
Wagner v. N. Y. Condensed Milk Co., 21 Misc. 62.
*
With carriages and wagons — horses running away.
Horse fastened with strap only.
Gottwald v. Bernheimer, 6 Daly, 212.
Collision.
McCahill v. Kipp, 2 E. D. Smith, 413.
Caught tail around reins and backed into plaintiff’s horse.
Campbell v. Kearney, 45 How. Pr. 87.
Left horse standing unhitched in street; it ran away and in-
jured carriage.
Nodine v. Doherty, 46 Barb. 59.
Drove on tow path. Frightened at boat.
Smith v. Clark, 3 Lans. 208.
Left standing unhitched in charge of a boy.
Frazer v. Kimler, 2 Hun, 514; 5 T. & C. 16.
Collision.
Gray v. Tompkins, 40 St. Rep. 546; 15 Supp. 953:
Bridles removed for noon hour; driver near by.
McMahon v. Kelly, 30 St, Rep. 915; 9 Supp. 544.
Did not guide team.
Cadwell v. Arnheim, 81 Hun, 39; 62 St. Rep. 574; 30
Supp. 573; 152 N. Y. 182.
Unhitched in street.
Wasmuth v. Butler, 86 Hun, 1; 66 St. Rep. 7103; 33
Supp. 108.
With carriages and wagons — special vehicles.
Stage; deep hole.
Harpell v. Curtis, 1 E. D. Smith, 78.
Ambulance.
Byrne v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 21 St. Rep. 469; 4
Supp. 531; 24 J. & S. 337; aff'd 121 N. Y. 7oo.
Ambulance.
Smith v. American Society, 7 Misc. 158; 57 St. Rep.
549; 27 Supp. 315.
VEHICLES. 439
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — unclassified.
In turning out.
Earing v. Lansing, 7 Wend. 185. ~
Turned to left.
Dudley v. Bolles, 24 Wend. 465.
Horse standing on pier run into and pushed overboard.
Morris v. Phelps, 2 Hilt. 38; 5 Johns. 49; dist. 133 N. Y.
347, and 45 St. Rep. 115, and 28 Abb. N. C. 309; ex-
plained 3 Hill, 134.
Wrong side; rule of the road.
Simmonson v. Stellenmerf, Edm. S. C. 194.
Defendant’s coachman negligent.
Sheridan v. Charlick, 4 Daly, 338; dist. 48 St. Rep. 412,
and 20 Supp. 529.
Collision.
Wolfe v. Mersereau, 4 Duer, 473.
Collision.
Jacobs v. Duke, 1 E. R. Smith, 271.
Plaintiff a passenger; both drivers negligent.
Knapp v. Dagg, 18 How. Pr. 165; disapproved 31 Barb.
385.
Passing in same direction.
Burdick v. Worrall, 4 Barb. 596.
Did not turn out.
Smith v. Dygert, 12 Barb. 613.
Collision.
Center v. Finney, 17 Barb. 94.
Aff’d sub nom.,
Center v. Finne, aff’d Seld. Notes (2nd ed.), p. 80.
Last of three teams tried to pass.
Burnham v. Butler, 31 N. Y. 480.
Driver of ice wagon was walking behind it; horses did not turn
out.
Welling v. Judge, 40 Barb. 193.
Expert evidence on the extent of the injury.
Briant v. Trimmer, 47 N. Y. 96.
Ownership of horses and carriage.
Sloane v. Elmer, 1 Hun, 310; rev. 64 N..Y. 201.
Measure of damages.
Ryan v. Lewis, 3 Hun, 429.
440 VEHICLES.
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — unclassified.
Going in opposite direction.
Michael v. Stanton, 3 Hun, 462; dist. 48 St. Rep. 412,
and 20 Supp. 529; 5 T. & C. 634.
Apprentice of defendant was driving. *
Sherwood v. Fischer, 3 Hun, 606.
Collision.
Scott v. Wood, 18 Week. Dig. 441.
Brake caught; buggy overturned.
Metcalf v. Baker, 2 J. & S. 10; 11 Abb. Pr. N. S. 431;
aff'd 52 N. Y. 649; 57 N. Y. 662.
Collision.
Mott v. Consumers’ Ice Co., 2 Abb. N. C. 143; 52 How.
Pr. 148; aff'd 52 How. Pr. 244; 73 N. Y. 543; 8 Daly;
244; applied 36 St. Rep. 675, and 14 Supp. 125.
Did not turn to right.
Pike,v. Bosworth, 7 St. Rep. 665.
Driving in rear.
Martin v. Wood, 18 St. Rep. 274; 4 Supp. 208; aff’d 23
St. Rep. 457, and 5 Supp. 274, and 1 Sil. S. C. 2123.
approved 23 St. Rep. 458, and 5 Supp. 274.
Did not turn to right.
Newman v. Ernst, 31 St. Rep. 1; 10 Supp. 310.
Turned off track for car and back into light wagon.
Baumann v. Gilmour, 31 St. Rep. 283; 10 Supp. 534.
Evidence of physician.
Wiel v. Cowles, 45 Hun, 307; 12 St. Rep. 427.
Trying to pass teams ahead.
Richardson v. Van Ness, 53 Hun, 267 ; 25 St. Rep. 60;
6 Supp. 618.
Horse swerved when turning out.
Crozier v. Read, 78 Hun, 181; 60 St. Rep. 215; 28 Supp.
O14.
Servant of defendant ran into plaintiff.
Hill v. Sheehan, 48 St. Rep. 410; 20 Supp. 529.
Horse suddenly turned in passing.
Lonergan v. Martin, 4 Misc. 624; 53 St. Rep. 320; 23
Supp. 968.
VEHICLES. 441
COLLISIONS.
With carriages and wagons — unclassified.
Reckless driver.
Doherty v. Lord, 8 Misc. 227; 59 St. Rep. 445; 28 Supp..
720.
Right side of street impassable. Driving on left in opposite:
directions.
Quinn v. O’Keefe, g App. Div. 68; 75 St. Rep. 578; 41
Supp. 116.
Racing horses.
Hanrahan v. Cochran, 12 App. Div. 91; 76 St. Rep..
1031; 42 Supp. 1031.
Hit driver as he was getting on.
Kettle v. Turl, 13 Misc. 156; 68 St. Rep. 30; 34 Supp..
75; 14 Misc. 637, 70 St. Rep. 887; 35 Supp. 1110.
Wheel struck when crossing track.
Dater v. Fletcher, 14 Misc. 288; 70 St. Rep. 462; 35.
Supp. 686.
Infant ; crossed in front of wagon.
Ferguson v. Ehret, 10 Misc. 217; 63 St. Rep. 253; 30:
Supp. 1063; 14 Misc. 454; 70 St. Rep. 725; 35 Supp.
1020.
Collision.
Axlebrood. v. Rosen, 21 Misc. 352.
With street cars.
Passenger on platform.
Connolly v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 8 St. Rep. 901;
aff'd 22 St. Rep. 675, and 114 N. Y. 104.
Conductor hit; stopped to let passenger off.
Seaman v. Koehler, 33 St. Rep. 72g; 3 Silv. 127; 122°
N. Y. 646.
Newsboy on step of car.
Mills v. Woolverton, 9 App. Div. 82; 75 St. Rep. 5513.
41 Supp. go.
Car inspector on side step.
Bradford v. Self, 21 App. Div. 150.
RUN OVERS.
Alighting from street cars.
Adult.
McGowan v. Kuntz, 4 Alb. L. J. 92.
442 VEHICLES.
RUN OVERS.
Alighting from street cars.
Adult hit by sleigh.
Moody v. Osgood, 50 Barb. 628; applied 80 N. Y. 390;
applied 118 N. Y. 82, and 27 St. Rep. 865; applied
29 St. Rep. 331, and 8 Supp. 792; 60 Barb. 644; aff’d
54 N. Y. 488; applied 62 How. Pr. 436.
Going towards car.
Chisholm v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 17 St. Rep. 624;
1 Supp. 743.
Run over.
Moriarty v. Zepp, 42 St. Rep. 824; 17 Supp. 28.
About to board car.
Lahey v. Ottmann, 73 Hun, 61; 56 St. Rep. 109; 25
Supp. 897.
Run over.
Reens v. Mail & F. Pub. Co., 10 Misc. 122; 62 St. Rep.
511; 30 Supp. 913; aff'd 150 N. Y. 582.
At crosswalk — adults.
Phelps v. Wait, 30 N. Y. 78.
Baker v. Savage, 1 Sw. 288; rev. 45 N. Y. 191.
Brooks v. Schwerin, 54 N. Y. 343; dist. 130 N. Y ‘502,
and 42 St. Rep. 387; dist. 61 Hun, 312, and 4o St.
Rep. 776, and 16 Supp. 77; explained 56 Hun, 325,
and 31 St. Rep. 159, and 9 Supp. 679; dist. 64 N. Y.
589; dist. 11 Hun, 365; criticised 6 T. & C. 454; ap-
plied 19 Hun, 280.
Sheehan v. Edgar, 58 N. Y. 631.
Belton v. Baxter, 1 J. & S. 182; rev. 54 N. Y. 245; 14
Abb. Pr. N. S. 404; 58 N. Y. 411; dist. 56 Hun, ror,
and 29 St. Rep. 962, and 9 Supp. 162.
Myers v. Dixon, 3 J & S. 390; 45 How. Pr. 48.
Helmrich v. Hart, 16 Week. Dig. 356.
Atkinson v. Oelsner, 32 St. Rep. 1088; 10 Supp. 822.
McManus v. Woolverton, 47 St. Rep. 107; 19 Supp.
545-
Ottendorf v. Willis, 80 Hun, 262; 61 St. Rep. 859; 30
Supp. 168.
Scotti v. Behsmann, 81 Hun, 604; 63 St. Rep. 184; 30
Supp. 990.
VEHICLES. 443
RUN OVERS.
At crosswalk — adults.
Canton v. Simpson, 2 App. Div. 561; 74 St. Rep. 441;
38 Supp. 13.
McDonnell v. Elias Brewing Co., 16 App. Div. 223.
At crosswalk — infants.
Girl of 3 years.
Connery v. Slavin, 23 Week. Dig. 545. °
Child between 3 and 4 years.
Murphy v. Orr, 96 N. Y. 14; dist. 59 Hun, 458, and 36
St. Rep. 838, and 13 Supp. 344; followed 108 N. Y.
352, and 13 St. Rep. 648, and 28 Week. Dig. 211.
Child of 4.
Birkett v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 41 Hun, 404; 3 St.
Rep. 133; 25 Week. Dig. 46; aff’d 18 St. Rep. 130,
and 110 N. Y. 504; 10 Civ. Pro. Rep. 52.
Boy of 6; quick trot around corner; not looking.
Oelerich v. N. Y. Condensed Milk Co., 24 St. Rep. 699;
2 Sil. S. C. 563; 6 Supp. 127; aff’d 127 N. Y. 680.
Boy of 4 years.
Moskovitz v. Lighte, 68 Hun, 102; 52 St. Rep. 216; 22
Supp. 732; aff'd 55 St. Rep. 929, and 140 N. Y. 619.
Boy of 6 years.
-Elze v. Baumann, 2 Misc. 72; 49 St. Rep. 629; 21 Supp.
782.
Girl of 7 with sister of 124 years.
Pressman v. Mooney, 5 App. Div. 121; 39 Supp. 44.
Girl of 8 with sister of 12 years.
Rottenberg v. Segelke, 6 Misc. 3; 58 St. Rep. 120; 25
Supp. 997; aff'd 148 N. Y. 734.
Team came around corner on a trot.
Cook v. Standard Oil Co., 9 App. Div. 105; 75 St. Rep.
610; 41 Supp. 152.
Horses running away.
Ran over adult in street near his team, peddling.
Norris v. Kohler, 1 Sweeney, 39; rev. 41 N. Y. 42; fol-
lowed 57 N. Y. 108.
Harness broke.
Blue v. Blasi, 11 Week. Dig. 341.
444 VEHICLES.
RUN OVERS.
Horses running away.
Boy of 13 years; not at crosswalk.
Crowley v. Palen, 65 How. Pr. 435; 16 Week. Dig. 354.
Horse ran out of yard into street.
Doherty v. Sweetser, 82 Hun, 556; 64 St. Rep. 313; 31
Supp. 649.
Frightened by passing L train. :
Van Houten v. Fleischman, 1 Misc. 130; 48 St. Rep.
763; 20 Supp. 643; aff’d 60 St. Rep. 867, and 142 N.
Y. 624.
In roadway — adults.
Pedestrian.
Tracy v. Kuntz, 47 N. Y. 663.
Limitation.
Groth v. Washburn, 34 Hun, 509; 89 N. Y. 615; 39
Hun, 324; dist. 48 Hun, 173, and 15 St. Rep. 650,
and 14 Civ. Pro. 248.
Driver on business for a fellow-servant.
Cavanagh v. Dinsmore, 12 Hun, 465; applied 17 Hun,.
102; dist. 48 St. Rep. 411, and 20 Supp. 529.
Man in street drawing sled.
Wiel v. Wright, 29 St. Rep. 763; 8 Supp. 776.
Driving very fast.
Keck v. Sandford, 2 Misc. 484; 51 St. Rep. 150; 22
Supp. 78.
Evidence.
Clarke v. Westcott, 2 App. Div. 503; 74 St. Rep. 406;.
37 Supp. I11I.
Clerk of Express Co. in place of regular driver.
Petersen v. Hubbell, 12 App. Div. 372; 76 St. Rep. 5543.
42 Swpp. 554.
In roadway — infants.
Child of 2 chasing pigs.
McAllister v. Hammond, 6 Cow. 342.
Girl of 17 months.
Krieg v. Wells, 1 E. D. Smith, 74.
Boy.
Durant v. Lipsius, 5 St. Rep. 841; see 96 N. Y. 14.
VEHICLES, 445
RUN OVERS.
In roadway — infants.
Boy of 6 years.crossing street.
Moebus v. Herrmann, 38 Hun, 370; aff'd 13 St. on
648, and 28 Week. Dig. 211, and 108 N. Y. 349; dist.
59 Hun, 458, and 36 St. Rep, 838, and 13 Supp. 344.
Girl of 7 or 8 years.
Henderson v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 23 St. Rep. 530;
5 Supp. 909; 1 Silv. 487; aff'd 119 N. Y. 619.
Girl between 5 and 6 years.
Finkelstein v. Crane, 2 Misc. 545; 51 St. Rep. 613; 22
Supp. 399.
Boy of 5 years.
Keller v. Haaker, 2 App. Div. 245; 73 St. Rep. 3743; 37
Supp. 792.
Boy of 17 years running across street ; fell.
Rattagliata v. Hubbell, 7 Misc. 103; 57 St. Rep. 482;
27 Supp. 409.
Child of 2 years and 3 months.
McKenna v. Buffalo B. B. Co., 12 Misc. 485 ; 67 St. Rep.
3853 33 Supp. 684. -
On sidewalks.
Pedestrian jumped and injured himself.
Coulter v. American M. U. E. Co., 5 Lans. 67; rev. 56
N. Y. 585; approved and applied 20 Hun, 175; fol-
lowed 71 N. Y. 236; followed 85 N. Y. 531.
Projecting timber swept against plaintiff.
Sheehy v. Burger, 62 N. Y. 558.
Boy of 8 years; wagon backed on sidewalk to load.
Hand v. Klinker, 22 J. & S. 433; 7 St. Rep. 21.
' Mules started and ran over two infants.
Knupfle v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 23 Hun, 159; rev.
84 N. Y. 488.
Horse running away.
Rolipillon v. Abbott, 17 St. Rep. 107; 1 Supp. 662; 28
Week. Dig. 563.
Infant near wall at side of street; no sidewalk.
Barrett v. Smith, 38 St. Rep. 526; 14 Supp. 307; 27 J. &
S. 250; rev. 38 St. Rep. 922, and 3 Silv. 520, and 128
N. Y. 607.
446. VEHICLES.
RUN OVERS.
On sidewalks.
Boy sitting near curb.
Keubler v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 39 St. Rep. 520;
15 Supp. 187.
Boy of 13 years.
Goff v. Akers, 1 Misc. 468; 49 St. Rep. 615; 21 Supp.
; 454; aff'd 54 St. Rep. 934, and 139 N. Y. 653.
Wagon backed on sidewalk.
Sullivan v. Brooks, 8 Misc. 532; 59 St. Rep. 273; 28
Supp. 1150; 10 Misc. 368; 63 St. Rep. 425; 31 Supp.
36.
Boy of 2 years and 7 months on sidewalk.
Engelback v. Ibert, 10 Misc. 535; 64 St. Rep. 121; 31
Supp. 438.
Frightened horse; adult
Myer v. Hart, 23 App. Div. 131.
Special vehicles — claiming right of way.
Boarding street car; run over by ambulance.
Maximillian v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 2 Hun, 263;
4 T. & C. 491; aff'd 62 N. Y. 160; followed 11 Hun,
439; followed 12 Hun, 217; followed 70 N. Y. 464;
followed 71 N. Y. 584; dist. 55 How. Pr. 183; dist.
12 Hun, 547; dist. 54 How. Pr. 247; dist. 83 N. Y.
528.
Fire engine ran over pedestrian on sidewalk.
O’Meara v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 1 Daly, 425.
Hose cart ran over pedestrian crossing street at night.
Smith v. City of Rochester, 13 Hun, 314; aff'd 76 N. Y.
506; approved 47 Hun, 389, and 14 St. Rep. 623, and
19 Abb. N. C. 158; dist. go N. Y. 435.
Mail wagon ran over pedestrian crossing street.
O’ReilJy v. Utah & N. Stage Co., 87 Hua, 406; 68 St.
Rep. 432; 34 Supp. 358.
Driver of street car; collision with mail wagon.
Sheehy v. Utah & N. Stage Co., 15 Misc. 21; 72 St. Rep.
6; 36 Supp. 777.
St. R. R. repair wagon following, plaintiff driving; both turned
to left at same time.
Northridge v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co.,15 Misc. 66; 71
St. Rep. 3; 36 Supp. 263.
VEHICLES. 447
RUN OVERS.
Special vehicles — claiming right of way.
Hose cart struck truck, which struck plaintiff.
Farley v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 15 Misc. 33; 72 St.
Rep. 264; 2 Ann. Cas. 324; 9 App. Div. 536; 75 St.
Rep. 1018; 41 Supp. 622; rev. 152 N. Y. 222. :
Special vehicles — stages and coaches.
Stage ran over adult at crossing.
Williams v. O’Kecfe, 9 Bosw. 536; 24 How. Pr. 16.
Stage ran over adult at crossing.
Diblin v. Murphy, 3 Sandf. 19.
Coach ran over infant; not at crossing.
Cowan v. Snyder, 24 St. Rep. 438; 5 Supp. 340; 1 Sil.
S. C. 396.
Coach ran over adult at crosswalk.
, Deegan v. Capel, 25 St. Rep. 336; 6 Supp. 166; 1 Silv.
563.
Working in street.
Laving pavement.
Anselment v. Daniell, 4 Misc. 144; 53 St. Rep. 133; 23
Supp. 875.
Mixing mortar.
Lyons v. Avis, 5 App. Div. 193; 38 Supp. 1104. |
Street sweeper.
Smith v. Bailey, 14 App. Div. 283; 77 St. Rep. 856; 43
Supp. 856.
Police officer.
McCue v. Finck, 20 Misc. 506.
Working in trench.
Campbell v. North Am. Brewing Co., 22 App. Div. 414.
Lamp trimmer on electric light.
~ Campbell v. Wood, 22 App. Div. 599.
Unclassified — adults.
Newly discovered evidence.
Budiong v. Westcott, 3 Hun, 618.
Both defendants liable.
Stroker v. Elting, 15 Week. Dig. 203.
448 VEHICLES.
RUN OVERS.
Unclassified — adults.
Same case sub nom.,
Stroher v. Elting, 97 N. Y. 102.
Walking in street.
Murphy v. Weidmann Coopetage, 1 App. is 283; 72
St. Rep. 486; 37 Supp. 151.
Horse unattended.
Pearl v. Macauley, 6 App. Div. 70; 39 Supp. 472.
Unclassified — infants.
Boy trying to steal a ride.
Wright v. Wilcox, 19 Wend. 343; dist. 4 Duer, 551;
dist. 5 Duer, 196: which was aff’d 17 N. Y. 365; dist.
73 N. Y. 547; applied 2 N. Y. 482; applied 39 N. Y.
383; applied 43 N. Y. 569; applied 47 N. Y. 127; dis-
approved 5 T. & C. 475; reviewed 64 N. Y. 135; fol-
lowed 30 N. Y. 79.
Boy of 10 years.
Ford v. Monroe, 20 Wend. 210; 6 How. Pr. 204; ex-
plained and criticised 2 Abb. C. A. D. 280; examined
and approved 1 N. Y. go.
No one to guard boy of 2 years in highway.
Hartfield v. Roper, 21 Wend. 615; dist. 12 St. Rep. 91;
explained and limited 104 N. Y. 351, and 5 St. Rep.
642, and 25 Week. Dig. 425; applied 38 N. Y. 457;
which aff’d 36 Barb. 238; followed 66 Barb. 51; dist.
60 N. Y. 326; applied 45 N. Y. ror.
Child 16 months old in street.
O’Keefe v. Ryan, Daily Reg., May 9, 1884.
Boy.
Edsall v. Vandemark, 39 Barb. 580.
Child of 6 years.
Jetter v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R. Co., 2 Keyes, 154; 2
Abb. C. A. D. 458; followed 6 Daly, 494; limited and
dist. 84 N. Y. 488.
Boy under 3 years.
Roeder v. Ormsby, 22 How. Pr. 270.
Going at a lively trot.
Crocker v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 92 N. Y. 652.
VEHICLES. 449
RUN OVERS.
Unclassified — infants.
Girl of 3 years and 4 months trying to cross in front of car.
Dudley v. Westcott, 40 St.-Rep. 506; 15 Supp. 952; rev.
44 St. Rep. 882, and 18 Supp. 130.
Ownership of wagon.
Birnbaum v. Lord, 6 Misc. 535; 58 St. Rep. 12; 27
Supp. 135; aff'd 7 Misc. 493, and 58 St. Rep. 54, and
28 Supp. 17.
Slipped from sidewalk into gutter.
Eckensberger v. Amend, 7 Misc. 452; 57 St. Rep. 569;
27 Supp. 941; rev. 10 Misc. 145, and 62 St. Rep. 479,
and 30 Supp. 915.
Boy running by side of election booth being carted.
Rice v. Buffalo Steel House Co., 17 App. Div. 462; 79
St. Rep. 277; 45 Supp. 277.
Employment of driver.
Spitzer v. Nassau N. Exp. Co., 20 Misc. 327; 79 St. Rep.
682; 45 Supp. 682.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Apprentice arrested; defendant agreed to pay.
Sherwood v. Fischer, 3 Hun, 606.
Loaded wagon blocked on hill while horse being shod; team
‘passing hit this, causing it to slide back on team behind it.
Newcomb v. Van Zile, 34 Hun, 275.
Leading cow on highway; buggy attempted to pass and ran
into cow.
Smith v. Matteson, 41 Hun, 216; 4 St. Rep. 204.
Drove on’ wire and injured lineman.
Clark v. Koehler, 46 Hun, 536; 12 St. Rep. 573; 28
Week. Dig. 94.
Intestate on ladder in ferry house putting up screens; defend-
ants’ wagon with scenery; scenery struck ladder.
Krulder v. Woolverton, 9 Misc. 359; 60 St. Rep. 614;
29 Supp. 696; 11 Misc. 537; 64 St. Rep. 467; 32 Supp.
742; aff'd 152 N. Y. 638.
Drag collided with sulky while exercising on race course.
Redmond v. Maitland, 23 App. Div. 194.
[29]
450
VENDORS.
VENDORS.
Sold sheep with scab ; communicated to new flock.
Jaffrey v. Bigelow, 13 Wend. 518.
Sold sulphate of iron instead of hyposulphate of soda, and pho-
tographs ruined.
Van Lien v. Scoville Mfg. Co., 4 Daly, 554; 14 Abb. Pr.
N.S. 74.
Defendants agreed to deliver mirrors in good order; injured in
transportation.
Schastey v. Bache, 9 Daly, 484.
Goods damaged while being returned.
Chase v. Union Stone Co., 63 How. Pr. 336; 11 Daly,
107.
Barrel shipped back and lost.
Purcell v. Jaycox, 3 T. & C. 406; 59 N. Y. 288.
False representations about notes; not reasonably diligent.
Kennedy v. Crandall, 3 Lans. 1.
Delay in delivery of boiler.
Waite v: N. Y. C.& H.R. R. R. Co.,, 2 Silv. 85; 110
N. Y. 635.
Purchase of land; did not obtain full information.
Dennerlein v. Dennerlein, 46 Hun, 561; 12 St. Rep.
640; 28 Week. Dig. 110; appeal dismissed 20 St, Rep.
110, and 111 N. Y. 518; dist. 42 St. Rep. 788, and 17
Supp. 159; 14 St. Rep. 932.
Purchaser did not search title.
Valentine v. Austin, 58 Hun, 398; 34 St. Rep. 638; 12
Supp. 196; aff’d 36 St. Rep. 400, and 124 N. Y. 4oo.
Goods sold to lessee of hotel. Hotel sued.
Conklin v. Prospect P. Hotel Co., 16 St. Rep. 312; 1
Supp. 406; 28 Week. Dig. 491; aff'd 125 N. Y. 711.
Sale of land, negligence in examining.
Schumaker v, Mather, 38 St. Rep. 542; 14 Supp. 411;
aff'd 44 St. Rep. 754, and 133 N. Y. 590.
Seller of canned salmon. :
Julian v. Laubenberger, 16 Misc. 646; 38 Supp. 1052.
Sold bags of coffee with a stone in and injured roasting ma-
chine.
Akers v. Overbeck, 18 Misc. 198; 75 St. Rep. 793; 41
Supp. 382.
Lights.
VESSELS, 451
VESSELS,
COLLISIONS.
Foot v. Wiswall, 14 Johns. 304.
Finch v. Brown, 13 Wend. 601.
Rathbun v. Payne. 19 Wend. 399.
Barnes v. Cole, 21 Wend. 188.
Fitch v. Livingston, 4 Sandf. 492; 7 How. Pr. 410; dist.
5 Daly, 517.
Silliman v. Lewis, 49 N. Y. 379; see 47 N. Y. 176.
Whitehall T. Co. v. N. J. S. B. Co., 51 N. Y. 369; ap-
plied 22 Hun, 309.
Delafield v. Union Ferry Co., 10 Bosw. 216; 5 Robt.
207; aff'd 51 N. Y. 671.
Hoffman v. Union Ferry Co., 4 Hun, 274; 47 N. Y. 176;
4 Hun, 274; aff’d 68 N. Y. 385.
Lambert v. Staten Island R. R. Co., 70 N. Y. 104; see
131 U.S.C. C. xi
Chase v. Belden, 5 St. Rep. 545; 25 Week. Dig. 392; 34
Hun, 571; 16 St. Rep. 528; 1 Supp. 48; aff'd 117 N.
Y. 637; dissenting opinion 27 St. Rep. 688.
Case v. Perew, 34 Hun, 130; 46 Hun, 57; aff'd 122
N. Y. 665.
Same case sub nom.,
Rules.
Case v. Pexew, 10 St. Rep. 811; aff’d 122 N. Y. 665.
Mailler v. Express P. Line, 61 N. Y. 312.
Aldridge v. Clausen, 42 Hun, 473; 6 St. Rep. 31; 25
Week. Dig. 273.
Minerly v. Union Ferry Co., 56 Hun, 113; 29 St. Rep.
960; 9 Supp. 104
N. Y. Harbor T. Co. v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co.,
76 Hun, 258; 59 St. Rep. 125; 27 Supp. 745; rev. 148
N.Y. 574.
Flannery v. Cornell S. S. Co., 89 Hun, 135; 68 St. Rep.
832; 34 Supp. 1069.
Clark v. Thayer, 14 App. Div. 510; 77 St. Rep. 897; 43
Supp. 897.
452 VESSELS.
COLLISIONS.
With rowboats.
Beck v. East River Ferry Co., 6 Robt. 82; dist. 66 N. Y.
13; dist 24 Hun, 101; followed 5 Daly, 454.
Harris v. Vebelhoer, 75 N. Y. 169; dist. 24 Hun, Io1.
Fitzsimons v. McConnell, 27 St. Rep. 590; 7 Supp. 869.
Reich v. Peck, 83 Hun, 214; 63 St. Rep. 806; 31 Supp.
391; aff'd 152 N. Y. 640.
Unclassified.
Raft ran against canal beat.
Paige v. Hazard, 5 Hill, 603; followed 13 Abb. Pr. 299.
Pilot in control; action against master.
Snell v. Rich, 1 Johns. 305.
Chasing neutral vessel.
Percival v. Hickey, 18 Johns. 257.
Schooner tied to pier at distance; rope under water; steamer
ran upon rope.
Annett v. Foster, 1 Daly, 502.
Power of agent to charter.
Martin v. Farnsworth, 1 J. & S. 246; 41 How. Pr. 59;
aff'd 49 N. Y. 555.
Bark forced against pier by current.
Repplier v. Baxter, 5 J. & S. 105.
Steamer did not reverse engine.
Hawkins v. Dutchess & O. S. S. Co., 2 Wend. 452.
Wilful collision.
Dygert v. Bradley, 8 Wend. 469.
Fog.
Denison v. Seymour, 9 Wend. 1.
Two steamboats.
Crary v. Marshall, 1 E. D. Smith, 530.
Steamer ran into bunch of schooners without hailing.
Mellog v. Smith, 2 E. D. Smith, see 10 Wall. 334, and
11 Wall. 238.
Ferry boat leaving slip.
Hunt v. Hoboken L. I. Co., 3 E. D. Smith, 144; 1 Hilt.
161; see 14 Wall. 270.
Intentional collision.
Richmond T. Co. v. Vanderbilt, 1 Hill, 480.
Same case sub nom.,
Vanderbilt v. Richmond T. Co., 2 N. Y. 479; dist. 4
VESSELS. 453
COLLISIONS.
Unclassified.
Duer, 551; dist. 5 Duer, 196; which was aff'd 17 N. Y.
366; applied 47 N. Y. 127.
Vessel grounded in channel.
Kelsey v. Barney, 12 N. Y. 425; followed 22 N. Y. 209.
Steamer collided with sloop.
Sherman v. Fram, 30 Barb. 478.
No helmsman on barge.
Haley v. Earle, 30 N. Y. 208.
Vessel aground in channel.
Austin v. N. J. S. B. Co., 43 N. Y. 75.
Sailing vessel drifting with tide.
Parrott v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 2 Sw. 93; rev. 46
N. Y. 361; dist. 114 N. Y. 338, and 23 St. Rep. 739;
followed 26 Hun, 120; followed 89 N. Y. 498.
Signals misunderstood. 4
Blanchard v. N. J. S. B. Co., 3 T. & C. 771; 59 N. Y.
292; applied 127 N. Y. 469, and 4o St. Rep. 200.
’ Tried to head off boat at lock.
Houghton v. Walce, 64 Barb. 613.
Question of ownership.
Wilson v. Knapp, 10 J. & S. 25; aff'd 70 N. Y. 596.
Tugs broke loose from moorings.
Carpenter v. Eastern Trans. Co., 67 Barb. 570; aff’d 71
N. Y. 574; dist. 80 N. Y. 108.
Action in another court. :
Checkley v. Providence & S. S.S. Co., 60 How. Pr. 510.
Tried to save property.
Rexter v. Starin, 73 N. Y. 601.
Adherence to rules.
Transportation Line v. Cooper, 75 N. Y. 116; aff’d 99
U.S. 78.
Collided with boat where plaintiff was working.
Cowen v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 6 St. Rep. 250; aff’d
112 N. Y. 664.
Generally negligent.
Perry v. Lansing, 17 Hun, 34.
Thrown from canal boat and drowned.
Quinn v. Power, 17 Hun, 102; 29 Hun, 183; 87 N. Y.
535.
454 VESSELS.
‘ COLLISIONS.
Unclassified.
Engineer of vessel injured.
Erwin v. Neversink S. S. Co., 23 Hun, 578; aff'd 88 N.
Y. 184; overruled 86 N. Y. gor; followed 25 Hun, 159.
Local custom conflicted with statutory rule. .
Palmer v. N. Y. & L. C. T. Co., 76 Hun, 181; 57 St.
Rep. 307; 27 Supp. 561; 88' Hun, 509; 69 St. Rep.
72; 34 Supp. 908; 8 App. Div. 615; 40 Supp. 341.
TOWING.
Caton v. Rumney, 13 Wend. 387.
Alexander v. Greene, 3 Hill, 9; rev. 7 Hill, 533; see 2
N. Y. 204;-see 8 N. Y. 375.
Salisbury v. Schuyler S. T. B. L., 22 Week. Dig. 185.
Wells v. Steam Nav. Co., 2 N. Y. 204; 8 N. Y. 375; dis-
approved 29 Barb. 132.
Merrick v. Brainard, 38 Barb. 574.
Same case sub nom.,
Merrick v. Van Santvoord, 34 N. Y. 208.
Milton v. Hudson R.S.S. Co., 37 N. Y. 210; 4 Tr. App.
252; 4 Lans. 76.
Woodin v. Austin, 51 Barb. 9; 4 Alb. L. J. 113.
Bissel v. Torrey, 65 Barb. 188; aff’d 60 N. Y. 635; 11
Alb. L. J. 211.
Taft v. Carter, 59 Barb. 67.
Baird v. Daly, 4 Lans. 426; rev. 57 N. Y. 236; dist. 75
N. Y. 528; 68 N. Y. 547; followed 24 Hun, 37; dist.
46 Hun, 69, and 10 St. Rep. 802, and 27 Week. Dig.
254; dist. 6 St. Rep. 48.
Cooper v. Eastern Trans. Co., 75 N. Y. 116.
White v. Old Dominion S. S. Co., 1 Silv. 41; 102 N. Y.
6608
McLean v. Schuyler S. T. B. L., 52 Hun, 43; 22 St.
Rep. 213; 4 Supp. 790; aff'd 117 N. Y. 644.
Tebo v. Jordan, 62 Hun, 514; 43 St. Rep. 9; 17 Supp.
80; 67 Hun, 393; 51 St. Rep. 319; 22 Supp. 156; 73
Hun, 218; 57 St. Rep. 149; 25 Supp. 1070; aff’d 70 St.
Rep. 38, and 147 N. Y. 387.
Feeney v. Minnisceongo T. Co., 50 St. Rep. 252; 21
Supp. 325.
VESSELS. 455
TOWING.
Nelson v. Easton & A. R. R. Co., 7 Misc. 656; 58 St.
Rep. 384; 28 Supp. 50.
UNCLASSIFIED.
Fire from sparks.
Cook v. Champlain T. Co., 1 Den. 91, approved 22
N. Y. 209; explained 6 Daly, 291.
Overloaded boat hired for carrying coal.
nelly v. Lehigh V. C. Co., 8 Daly, 291.
Boat did not come to tow, and raft injured.
Parmalee v. Wilks, 22 Barb. 539.
‘Crossing boat from his boat to wharf; fell into hatch.
Baker v. Byrne, 58 Barb. 438; see 31 Fed. Rep. 161.
“Catch” of tow boat caught tow line and drew horses into
canal.
Sherman v. Western Trans. Co., 62 Barb. 150.
Horses on tow path caught by rope of other boat and pulled in;
did not follow rules. i
Schoonmaker v. McNally, 6 T. & C. 47; 3 Hun, 415.
Removed boat from dock.
Satterly v. Hallock, 5 Hun, 178.
Scows of street cleaning department injured wharf.
N. J. Steamboat Co. v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 14
St. Rep. 57; 28 Week. Dig. 386; 2 Silv. 23; 109 N. Y.
621.
Boiler exploded and injured other boat.
Van Norden v. Robinson, 45 Hun, 567; 10 St. Rep.
643; 27 Week. Dig. 351.
Moved anchorage of vessel to pass; went ashore.
Bedell v. Kirk, 44. St. Rep. 483; 17 Supp. 638.
Fishing on wharf; ferry beat entering slip at side, pushed rack
on legs.
Malloy v. Staten Island R. T. Co., 78 Hun, 166; 60 St.
Rep. 182; 28 Supp. 979.
Accident to rudder.
Williams v. Hays, 23 St. Rep. 489; 5 Supp. 667; 2 Silv.
385; 17 Civ. Pro. 97; followed 24 St. Rep. 683, and
5 Supp. 667; 62 St. Rep. 451; 143 N. Y. 442; 2 App.
Div. 183; 73 St. Rep. 282; 37 Supp. 708.
456 WATER COURSES.
WATER COURSES.
CANALS.
Leaks — private canals.
Leaked. ;
Steele v. Western I. L. N., 2 Johns. 283.
Leaked.
Cuddeback v. D. & H. C. Co., 20 Week. Dig. 454.
Leaks — state canals.
Breach in bank.
Sipple v. State of New York, 99 N. Y. 284; 16 Abb. N.
C. 429; applied 104 N. Y. 567, and 6 St. Rep. 463,
and 26 Week. Dig. 169; followed 108 N. Y. 169, and
13 St. Rep. 134, and 28 Week. Dig. 266.
Banks improperly constructed.
Heacock v. State of New York, 7 St. Rep. 353; 26
Week. Dig. 227; 105 N. Y. 246; followed 105 N. Y.
255, and 7 St. Rep. 358, and 26 Week. Dig. 344; fol-
lowed 108 N. Y. 413, and 13 St. Rep. 815, and 28
Week. Dig. 3.
Same facts.
Collins v. State of New York, 105 N. Y. 641; followed
* I08N. Y. 413, and 13 St. Rep. 815, and 28 Week. Dig.
369.
Leak.
Clements v. State of New York, 105 N. Y. 621; followed
13 St. Rep. 815, and 28 Week. Dig. 369, and 108 N.
Yu AT3s
Constructing reservoir.
Reed y, State of New York, 13 St. Rep. 815; 28 Week.
Dig. 369; 108 N. Y. 407.
Defective embankment.
Sayre v. State of New York, 33 St. Rep. 156; 38 St.
Rep. 932; 3 Silv. 524; 123 N. Y. 201.
Leak.
Slavin v. State of New York, 7 Supp. 906; 152 N. Y. 45.
Leak.
Connor v. State of New York, 152 N. Y. 49.
WATER COURSES. 457
CANALS.
Unelassified.
Vessel ran on boat sunk in State Canal; sued commissioner.
Adsit v. Brady, 4 Hill, 630; followed 13 Hun, 427;
relied on 5 Lans. 293; relied on 5 Lans. 344; dist. 1
Hun, 572; followed 20 Barb. 620; followed 24 Barb.
170; explained 32 Barb. 634; dist. 93 N. Y. 557.
Rock fell from berme bank on plaintiff on his canal boat.
Weitner v. D. & H.C. Co., 4 Robt. 234.
Vessel hit obstruction in canal.
Exchange F. I. Co. v. D. & H.C. Co., 10 Bosw. 180.
Defective towpath ; horse drowned.
Fish v. Dodge, 38 Barb. 163; 4 Den. 311; overruled 34
N. Y. 389, and 46 N. Y. 194; applied 121 N. Y. 43,
and 30 St. Rep. 471; harmonized 25 St. Rep. 650, and
7 Supp. 38.
Towpath defective; horse drowned.
Minard v. Mead, 38 Barb. 174, n.; overruled 34 N. Y.
389; 7 Wend. 68; dist. 75 N. Y. 164.
Boat injured in defective lock.
Robinson v. Chamberlain, 34 N. Y. 389; applied 12
Hun, 554; applied 1 Lans. 294; which was aff'd 57
N. Y. 498; applied 6 Lans. 263; applied 5 Lans. 346;
applied 13 Hun, 429; applied 44 N. Y. 117; applied
47 N. Y. 131; applied 37 N. Y. 649; applied 11 Hun,
350; applied 20 Hun, 146; applied 47 N. Y. 485.
Boat sank in Erie Canal.
Fulton F. I. Co. v. Baldwin, 37 N. Y. 648; followed 5
Lans. 294; followed 5 Lans. 346; followed 6 Lans.
~263; applied 53 N. Y. 649; applied 114 N. Y. 369, and
23 St. Rep. 657, and 17 Civ. Pro. 25.
Canal Supt. cut boat to open navigation.
Hicks v. Dorn, 1 Lans. 81; aff'd 42 N. Y. 47; 9 Abb.
Pr. N.S. 47.
Boat injured in defective lock.
Johnson v. Belden, 2 Lans. 433; aff’d 47 N. Y. 130.
Commissioner made dock on canal and caused wharf to sink.
N.Y. & B. Sawmill & L. Co. v. City of Brooklyn, 8
Hun, 37; aff'd 71 N. Y. 580.
Canal broke and carried away three bridges.
Bidelman as Supervisor v. State of New York, 18 St.
Rep. 107; 110 N. Y. 232.
458 WATER COURSES.
DIVERSION.
For village supply.
Gardner v. Village of Newburgh, 2 Johns. Ch. 162.
Diverted water.
Reid v. Gifford, 6 Johns. Ch. 19; explained 9 N. Y.
423; explained and followed 66 Barb. 14.
Construction of railread.
Weed v. N. Y. & H R.R. Co., 29 N. Y. 616.
Building railroad.
Cott v. Lewiston R. R. Co., 36 N. Y. 214.
Culvert of railroad.
Easterbrook v. Erie R. R. Co., 51 Barb. 94.
Municipal corporation turned stream.
Kellogg v. Thompson, 66 N. Y. 88; criticised 47 St.
Rep. 845; disapproved 73 Hun, 237, and 57 St. Rep.
27, and 25 Supp. 1024.
Water power.
Emery v. Erskine, 66 Barb. 9.
Defective gates.
Silsby Mfg. Co. v. State of New York, 6 St. Rep. 463;
26 Week. Dig. 169; 104 N. Y. 562; dist. 60 Hun, 309,
and 38 St. Rep. 607, and 14 Supp. 421; dist. 42 St.
Rep. 418, and 17 Supp. 109. :
Stream diverted.
Lefurgy v. N. Y. & N. R. R. Co., 21 St. Rep. 113; 3
Supp. 302.
By wells and percolation.
Van Wycklen v. City of Brooklyn, 41 Hun, 418; 3 St.
Rep. 148; rev. 29 St. Rep. 790, and 118 N. Y. 424.
Building aqueduct. Water power injured.
Covert v. Crawford, 57 St. Rep. 720; 141 N. Y. 521.
FLOODING.
Dam broke. *
Bailey v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 3 Hill, 531; aff'd 2
Den. 433; 4 Den. 433; declared overruled 47 Hun,
389, and 14 St. Rep. 623, and 19 Abb. N. C. 158; dist.
65 Hun, 124, and 47 St. Rep. 258, and 19 Supp. 793;
explained 15 Barb. 442; explained 26 Barb. 624; ex-
plained 42 Barb. 634; explained 43 Barb. 115; ex-
plained 8 Bosw. 509; explained 2 Den. 482; explained
WATER COURSES. 459
FLOODING.
Dam broke.
5 N. Y. 64; explained 23 N. Y. 318; followed 3 N. Y.
467; followed 1 Sandf. 226; dist. 11 N. Y. 436; ex-
plained 5 Hun, 485.
Livingston v. Adams, 8 Cowen, 175.
Pixley v. Clark, 32 Barb. 268; rev. 35 N. Y. 520; ap-
plied 8 Abb. N. C. 355; explained 51 N. Y. 476; which
rev. 61 Barb. 86.
Jones v. Turner, 46 Barb. 527.
Pollett v. Long, 58 Barb. 20; rev. 56 N. Y. 200; dist.
118 N. Y. 229, and 28 St. Rep. 867; dist. 30 St. Rep.
916, and 9 Supp. 544.
Cottrell v. Marshall Infirmary, 70 Hun, 495; 53 St. Rep.
783; 24 Supp. 381.
State dams.
Opened gates.
McDougal v. State of New York, 14 St. Rep.-791; 28 :
Week. Dig. 404; 109 N. Y. 73; dist. 112 N. Y. 156,
and 20 St. Rep. 647.
State dam raised. '
Perkins v. State of New York, 23 St. Rep. 266; 2 Silv.
246; 113 N. Y. 660; followed 33 St. Rep. 156, and
123 N. Y. 295.
State dam.
Benedict v. State of New York, 30 St. Rep. 651; 120
N. Y. 228.
Defective dam across creek ; overflow.
Spencer v. State of New York, 48 St. Rep. 442; 135 N.
Y¥, 619.
Guard bank broken.
Stone v. State of New York, 51 St. Rep. 718; 138 N. Y.
124.
Unclassified.
Raised dam.
Waggoner v. Jermain, 3 Den. 306; applied 51 N. Y.
573-
Dam.
Crittenden v. Wilson, 5 Cow. 165.
460
WATER COURSES.
FLOODING.
Unclassified.
Flooded water power above.
Hammond v. Fuller, 1 Paige, 197.
Dam flooded land.
-Van Bergen v. Van Bergen, 2 Johns. Ch. 272; 3 Johns.
Ch. 282.
Flooding.
Brown v. Mohawk & H. R. R. Co., 1 How. App. Cas.
66 and 123.
Contractor for defendant building bridge. Improper dam
flooded cellar.
Kelly v. City of Yonkers, 14 Week. Dig. 170.
Former owner of dam sued instead of those in possession.
Blunt v. Aiken, 15 Wend. 522; followed 1 Lans. 288; as.
not overruled 3 Den. 312; virtually aff'd 2 N. Y. 174.
Dam flooded land; nuisance.
Brown v. Woodworth, 5 Barb. 550.
Injured power.
Harris v. Thompson, 9 Barb. 350; 15 Barb. 62; applied.
11 J. & S. 478; dist. 67 Barb. 261.
Cut bank of stream.
Brown v. Cayuga & 5S. R. R. Co., 12 N. Y. 486; applied.
21 St. Rep. 114, and 3 Supp. 302; applied 122 N. Y.
29, and 33 St. Rep. 246; applied 54 Hun, 51, and 26
St. Rep. 42, and 7 Supp. 158; applied 62 Hun, 168,
and 41 St. Rep. 761, and 16 Supp. 558; dist. 115 N. Y..
225, and 26 St. Rep. 295; explained and dist. 23 N. Y.
42; dist. 87 N. Y. 122; reviewed and questioned 51
N. Y. 573; applied 4 Abb. N. C. 32; applied 61 N. Y.
200; dist. 23 Barb. 490; explained 37 Barb. 406; ap-
plied 10 Bosw. 56.
To restrain prostrating dam as a nuisance.
Clarke v. City of Syracuse, 13 Barb. 32.
Bridge backed up water.
Conrad v. Village of Ithaca, 16 N. Y. 158; applied 1
Abb. C. A. D. 74; applied 1 Hun, 243; limited 31
Barb. 506; explained 8 Hun, 39; explained 32 Barb.
637; dist. 36 Barb. 227; followed 3 Hun, 512; dist. 25
Hun, 22: dist. 51 Barb. 411; applied 60 Barb. 385;
applied 66 N. Y. 341; applied 1 T. & C. 540; applied.
3T.&C.7.
WATER COURSES, 461
FLOODING.
Unclassified.
Constructed railroad.
Bellinger v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 23 N. Y. 42; dist. 103
N. Y. 19, and 12 Civ. Pro. 222, and 3 St. Rep. 56;
dist. 122 N. Y. 26, and 33 St. Rep. 246; dist. 46 Hun,
69, and 10 St. Rep. 802, and 27 Week. Dig. 254; lim-
ited 44 St. Rep. 11, and 17 Supp. 336; explained 51
N. Y. 476; dist. 58 N. Y. 416; followed 3 Hun, 523;
followed 5 T. & C. 651.
Enlargement of canal.
Selden v. D. & H. C. Co., 24 Barb. 362; compared and
doubted 57 N. Y. 476; see 23 N. Y. 42; 29 N. Y. 634.
‘Water in cellar.
Chase v. N. Y.C.& H.R. R.R. Co., 24 Barb. 273.
Dam flooded land.
Hubbard y. Russell, 24 Barb. 404; applied 115 N. Y.
211, and 26 St. Rep. 295; compared 51 N. Y. 573.
Flooded land.
Robinson v. N. Y. & Erie R. R. Co., 27 Barb. 512.
Dam set back water.
Beckwith v. Griswold, 29 Barb. 291.
Dam improperly built.
Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519; dist. 107 N. Y. 315,
and 12 St. Rep. 53, and 27 Week. Dig. 441; dist. 84
N.Y. Bit,
Railroad embankment and ditches.
Plate v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 37 N. Y. 472; applied 78
N. Y. 423.
Flooded land.
Phillips v. Terry, 3 App. C. A. D. 607; 3 Keyes, 313.
Property borne on lands of another by flood.
Sheldon v. Sherman, 42 Barb. 368; aff’d 42 N. Y. 484;
dist. 6 Abb. Pr. N.S. 352.
Dam flooded land.
Hudson v. Caryl, 44 N. Y. 553; dist. 129 N. Y. 286, and
41 St. Rep. 541, and 28 Abb. N. C. 1, and 21 Civ. Pro.
420; followed 59 Hun, 429, and 36 St. Rep. 639, and
13 Supp. 378, and 26 Abb. N. C. 423.
Railroad embankment.
Conhocton S. R.v. B.,N. Y.& L. E.R. R. Co.. §2 Barb.
390; rev. 51 N. Y. 573: 3 Hun, §23; 5 T. & C. 651;
462 WATER COURSES.
FLOODING.
Unelassified.
dist. 44 Hun, 223, and 7 St. Rep. 829, and 26 Week.
Dig. 535; followed 115 N. Y. 224, and 26 St. Rep.
295; followed 45 Hun, 400, and 10 St. Rep. 137.
Building sewer. =
Donohue v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 3 Daly, 65.
Mill pond overflowed.
Miller v. Church, 2 T. & C. 259; followed 5 Hun, 342;
applied 26 St. Rep. 295, and 115 N. Y. 212.
Embankment narrowed chennel.
Moyer v. N. Y.C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 88 N. Y. 3513; 98
N. Y. 645; dist. 29 St. Rep. 790, and 118 N. Y. 432.
Dam ; nuisance.
Rothery v. N. Y. Rubber Co., 24 Hun, 172; aff’d go
N. Y. 30.
Flooded back.
Thomas v. Utica & B. R. R. R. Co., 97 N. Y. 245.
Raised dam.
Penfield v. N. Y. & Mt. V. Water Co., 24 St. Rep. 726;
6 Supp. 180; 2 Silv. 495; aff’d 128 N. Y. 632.
Raised dam; quarry flooded.
De Long v. Curtis, 35 Hun, 94.
Carelessly discharged water from reservoir.
Markham v. Barnes, 8 St. Rep. 502.
Cofferdam in building bridge set water back.
Atwater v. Trustees of Canandaigua, 56 Hun, 293; 30
St. Rep. 587; 9 Supp. 557; aff'd 37 St. Rep. 234, and
124 N. Y. 602; dist. 44 St. Rep. 11, and 17 Supp. 336;
dist. 65 Hun, 35, and 47 St. Rep. 64, and 19 Supp..
603 ; followed 2a Supp. 932.
Soil washed away.
Hartshorn v. Chaddock, 40 St. Rep. 953; 16 Supp. 714;
aff'd 47 St. Rep. 838; 48 St. Rep. 932; 135 N. Y. 116..
Insufficient sluiceway.
Drake v. N. Y., L. & W. R. R. Co., 75 Hun, 422; 57 St..
Rep. 345; 27 Supp. 739.
Culvert of embankment insufficient.
Mundy v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 75 Hun, 479;
57 St. Rep. 367; 27 Supp. 469.
State Supt. of Public Works did not remove flushboards from.
WATER COURSES, 463,°
FLOODING.
Unelassified.
State dam.
Wright v. Shanahan, 61 Hun, 264; 4o St. Rep. 928; 16
Supp. 785; 83 Hun, 615; 64 St. Rep. 884; aff'd 149.
N. Y. 495.
Culvert too small.
Barber v. Town of New Scotland, 88 Hun, 522; 69 St.
Rep. 31; 34 Supp. 968.
Overflow pipe of reservoir closed; water flowed into well.
Odell v. Nyack W. W. Co., 91 Hun, 283; 71 St. Rep.
94; 36 Supp. 206
Leakage from city reservoir.
Southard v. City of Brooklyn, 1 App. Div. 175; 72 St.
Rep. 649; 37 Supp. 136.
Embankment and bridge.
Orvis v. Elmira, C. & N. R. R. Co., 17 App. Div. 187;
79 St. Rep. 367; 45 Supp. 367. ;
OBSTRUCTIONS.
Bridges — vessels.
Train ran into open draw and fell on boat.
Briggs v.N. Y.C. & H.R. R. R. Co., 1 Buff. Super. Ct.
4o2; aff'd 1 Buff. Super. Ct. 433; 30 Hun, 291; 72
N. Y. 26. .
Draw did not open in time for vessel.’
Reilly v. Hudson River Bridge Co., 20 Week. Dig. 549.
Vessel driven against bridge by ice; tried to get away; part of
bridge fell on vessel.
Mark v. Hudson River Bridge Co., 2 St. Rep. 746; 56
How. Pr. 108; 3 St. Rep. 746; 103 N. Y. 28.
Draw did not open for vessel.
Godfrey v. County of Queens, 89 Hun, 18; 69 St. Rep.
24; 34 Supp. 1052.
Bridge lowered on canal beat.
Locke v. State of New York, 56 St. Rep. 454; 140 N. Y.
482.
Piers and docks.
Dock outside of other dock ; nuisance.
Lansing v. Smith, 8 Cow. 146; aff’d 4 Wend. 9; dist. 125
464 WATER COURSES.
OBSTRUCTIONS.
Piers and docks.
N. Y. 185, and 34 St. Rep. 876; dist. 133 N. Y. 86,
and 44 St. Rep. 248; followed 103 N. Y. 257, and
3 St. Rep. 48.
Pier. .
People v. Vanderbilt, 26 N. Y. 287; 24 How. Pr. 301;
followed 11 Abb. N. C. 304; followed 49 How. Pr.
515; which was aff'd 7 Hun, 109; dist. 2 Hun, 181,
and 77 N. Y. 260; 38 Barb. 282; aff’d 25 How. Pr.
‘138; 28 N. Y. 3096.
Platform on pier.
Moore v. Board of Comm. of Pilots, 32 How. Pr. 184.
Dock.
D. & H.C. Co. v. Lawrence, 2 Hun, 163; aff'd 56 N. Y.
612.
Permanent float; nuisance.
De Laney v. Blizzard, 7 Hun, 7; 7 Hun, 66.
Unclassified.
Wall on bank; nuisance.
Mayor, etc. of Rochester v. Curtiss, Clarke Ch. 336.
Dam; nuisance. ,
Rogers v. Barker, 31 Barb. 447.
Wall encroached.
City of Rochester vy. Erickson, 46 Barb. 92.
Dam ; nuisance.
Munson v. People, 5 Park. 16.
Cables in river; vessel ran on them.
* Blanchard v. Western Union T. Co., 3 T. & C. 775;
rev. 60 N. Y. 510; 67 Barb. 228.
Obstructed tail race.
Bloomer v. Morss, 68 N. Y. 623.
Bridge; nuisance..
People ex rel. Murphy v. Kelly; 76 N. Y. 475;.5 Abb.
N. C. 383; explained and applied 23 Hun, 568; which
was rev. 85 N. Y. 541.
Obstructed stream.
McCormick v. Horan, 81 N. Y. 86; dist. 109 N. Y. ro1,
and 15 St. Rep. 182,,.and 28 Week. Dig. 553.
Rafts ; nuisance.
Moore v. Jackson, 2 Abb. N. C. 211; 4 Wend. 58.
WATER COURSES. 465
OBSTRUCTIONS.
Unclassified.
Floating elevator.
People v. Horton, 5 Hun, 516; 64 N. Y. 610.
Sunken boat.
Coonley v. City of Albany, 57 Hun, 327; 32 St. Rep.
411; 10 Supp. 512; aff'd 43 St. Rep. 549, and 132
N. Y. 145.
POLLUTION.
Throwing ashes into harbor.
Commissioners of Pilots v. Frost, 4 Daly, 353.
Flax shives.
O’Riley v. McChesney, 3 Lans. 278; 49 N. Y. 672.
Gas-house ; nuisance.
Carhart v. Auburn G. L. Co., 22 Barb. 297.
Hog pens; nuisance.
Davis v. Lambertson, 56 Barb. 480.
Laundry; soapy dirty water.
Wiel v. Stewart, 1g Hun, 272; explained 39 St. Rep.
323, and 15 Supp. Io.
Mash, f
Mayor, etc. of New York v. Baumberger, 7 Robt. 219.
Mash from distillery.
Hudson R. R. R. Co. v. Loeb, 7 Robt. 418.
Mash.
Manhattan G. L. Co. v. Barker, 7 Robt. 523; 36 How.
Pr. 233.
Privies.
Gregory v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 1 Daly, 243; rev.
40 N. Y. 273.
Privy.
Board of Health v. Casey, 18 St. Rep. 251; 3 Supp. 399.
Refuse.
Young v. Hurd, 16 St. Rep. 385; 1 Supp. 819; 28 Week.
Dig. 418.
Sawdust.
Ellsworth v. Putnam, 16 Barb. 565.
Sawdust; nuisance.
City of Ogdensburgh v. Lovejoy, 2 T. & C. 83; aff'd
58 N. Y. 662.
[30] -
WATER COURSES.
POLLUTION.
Sawdust.
Dallmari v. Wilcox, 23 Week. Dig. 231.
Sewer.
Whitmore v. Bischoff, 5 Hun, 176.
Sewer ; nuisance. “
Chipman v. Palmer, 9 Hun, 308, note; aff'd 77 N. Y. 51;
9 Hun, 517; dist. 124 N. Y. 319, and 36 St. Rep. 265.
Sewage.
Seaman v. Lee, 10 Hun, 607.
Sewer.
Hooker v. City of Rochester, 37 Hun, 181; aff'd 107
N. Y. 676; followed 124 N. Y. 624, and 35 St. Rep.
73, and 3 Silv. 341; 35 St. Rep. 408; 12 Supp. 671;
aff'd 36 St. Rep. 458, and 20 Civ. Pro. 189, and 126
N. Y. 635.
Sewer.
Michel v. Supervisers of Monroe, 39 Hun, 47.
Sewage.
Chapman v. City of Rochester, 18 St. Rep. 133; 23
Week. Dig. 424; aff'd 110 N. Y. 273; dist. 51 Hun,
571, and 22 St. Rep. 641, and 4 Supp. 312; followed
25 St. Rep. 316, and 2 Silv. 3, and 6 Supp. 174.
Sewage.
Bell v. City of Rochester, 33 St. Rep. 739; 11 Supp. 305.
Sewer ; nuisance.
Demby v. City of Kingston, 60 Hun, 294; 38 St. Rep.
42; 14 Supp. 601; aff'd 44 St. Rep. 929, and 133 N. Y.
538.
Sewer.
Jackson v. City of Rochester, 7 St. Rep. 853; 26 Week.
Dig. 206; aff'd 35 St. Rep. 73, and 3 Silv. 341, and
124 N. Y. 624.
Sewage. @
Yoos v. City of Rochester, 92 Hun, 481; 72 St. Rep.
412; 36 Supp. 1072. ‘
Stables and closet.
Kelly v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 89 Hun, 246.
Tanbark.
Thomas v. Brackney, 17 Barb. 654.
Tanbark.
West v. Kiersted, 15 Week. Dig. 540.
WATER COURSES. 467
POLLUTION.
Drainage from county farm.
Lefrois v. County of Monroe, 24 App. Div. 421 ; 88 Hun,
109; 68 St. Rep. 535; 34 Supp. 612.
UNCLASSIFIED.
To maintain reservoir dam.
Belknap v. Trimble, 3 Paige, 577.
Dam made stagnant water ; nuisance.
People v. Townsend, 3 Hill, 479.
Nuisance; water rights; quantity under deed.
Olmsted v. Loomis, 6 Barb. 152; modified 9 N. Y. 423.
Nuisance; quantity of water under water rights.
Fisk v. Wilber, 7 Barb. 395.
Nuisance; removed State dam.
Harris v. Thompson, 9 Barb. 350; 15 Barb. 62; applied
11 J. &S. 478; dist. 67 Barb. 261.
Ditches collected surface water and discharged into stream.
Waffle v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 58 Barb. 413; dist. 66
N.Y. G32 aff'd 53 N.Y. 113 limited 79 N. Y. 476.
Tore down dam.
Merrill v. Calkins, 10 Hun, 495; aff'd 74 N. Y.1.
Dam made stagnant water ; nuisance.
Adams v. Popham, 76 N. Y. 410.
Dam would prevent use of ice elevator.
Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Shultz, 41 Hun, 458; aff’d 26
St. Rep. 852, and 116 N. Y. 382.
Debris deposited on neighbor by stream.
Wright v. Syracuse R. R. Co., 49 Hun, 445; 3 Supp.
480; 23 St. Rep. 78; aff'd 124 N. Y. 668.
WHARFINGERS.
BOTTOM.
Obstruction under water.
Moody v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 43 Barb. 2823; 34
How. Pr. 288. j
Irregular bottom in front of wharf.
Leary v. Woodruff, 4 Hun, 99; aff'd 76 N. Y. 617; 6
T. & C. 390; 19 Alb. L. J. 336.
463 WHARFINGERS.
BOTTOM.
Spiles in front of pier.
Seaman v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 80 N. Y. 239.
Uneven bottom.
Barber v. Abendroth Bros., Daily Reg., Dec., 1884; 20
Week. Dig. 7; aff'd 102 N. Y. 406.
Unsafe bottom at side of pier.
Vroman v. Rogers, 25 St. Rep. 933; 5 Supp. 426; aff'd
43 St. Rep. 564, and 132 N. Y. 167.
Bottom and dock defective.
Washington v. Staten Island R. T. R. R. Co., 68 Hun,
87; 52 St. Rep. 29; 22 Supp. 599.
Rock in bottom.
McCaldin v. Parke, 66 Hun, 323; 50 St. Rep. 262; 21
Supp. 277; 52 St. Rep. 745; 23 Supp. 370; rev. 60 St.
Rep. 297; 142 N. Y. 564.
DRY DOCKS.
Plaintiffs owned vessel ; injured on dry dock.
Burckle v. N. Y. Dry Dock Co., 2 Hall, 170.
Defective plank ; injured workman.
Mulcahy v. N. Y. Floating D. D. Co.. 8 Daly, 93.
PIER.
Animals.
Stringpiece only 2 inches high.
Radway v. Briggs, 37 N. Y. 256; followed 73 N. Y.
365; limited 59 N. Y. 28; 35 How. Pr. 422.
Horse lost; defective pier.
Taylor v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 4 E. D. Smith,
559; limited 59 N. Y. 28.
Horse fell through hole.
Cannavan v. Conklin, 1 Daly, 509; 1 Abb. Pr. N. Ss.
271,
Hole in pier; rushing water frightened horse; went overboard
and drowned.
Macauley v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 67 N. Y. 602.
No string piece; horse backed off.
Kennedy v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 73 N. Y. 365; 29:
Am. Rep. 169; dist. 104 N. Y. 439, and 5 St. Rep.
730, and 26 Week. Dig. 14; relied on 28 Alb. L. J. 14.
WHARFINGERS, 469
PIER.
Animals.
Hole in dock; dump.
Boylan v. Brown, 43 St. Rep. 412; 17 Supp. 648.
Horse fell through hole in pier.
Clancy v. Byrne, 58 Barb. 449; 65 Barb. 344; rev. 56
N. Y.129; 15 Am. Rep. 391, with note; followed 115
N. Y. 218, and 26 St. Rep. 295; followed 54 Hun, 29,
and 26 St. Rep. 42, and 7 Supp. 158; followed 15 J. &
S. 298; dist. 8 Hun, 391; applied 59 N. Y. 31.
Cleat at end of dock defective; drove off.
Fitzpatrick v. Tweddle, 73 Hun, 105; 56 St. Rep. 84; 25
Supp. 904; aff’d 144 N. Y. 704.
No guard; horse and wagon went over dump.
McArdle v. Smith, 1 Misc. 3; 48 St. Rep. 507; 20 Supp.
612.
Plank gave way. Plaintiff’s trunk thrown off coach into water.
Garrison v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 5 Bosw. 497.
Persons.
No lights; expected to touch train; fell off.
Harden v. N. Y.C. & H. R.R. Co., 17 J. & S. 503.
Pier fell on longshoreman.
Swords v. Edgar, 17 Am. Rep. 139; 44 How. Pr. 139;
| «T. & C. 23; aff'd 59 N. Y. 28; dist. 87 N. Y. 471;
compared 8 Hun, 387; applied 15 J. & S. 298; dist. 18
Week. Dig. 259; dist. 98 N. Y. 254; applied 64 Hun,
183, and 46 St. Rep. 158, and 18 Supp. 915; dist. 132
N. Y. 504, and 44 St. Rep. 863; followed 115 N. Y.
219, and 26 St. Rep. 295; followed 126 N. Y. 523, and
37 St. Rep. 906; followed 54 Hun, 49, and 26 St. Rep.
42, and 7 Supp. 158.
Stevedore hired derrick from defendants, who samme wharf
and derrick. Servant of stevedore hit by falling basket;
rope broke.
Burke v. De Castro, 11 Hun, 354; declared overruled
65 Hun, 576, and 48 St. Rep. 596, and 20 Supp. 523.
Fell in holes at street end of pier.
Dorland v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 18 Week. Dig.
51; rev. 19 Week. Dig. 76.
470 WHARFINGERS.
PIER.
Persons.
Door of dock fell on man carrying baggage.
Newall v. Bartlett, 1 St. Rep. 718; aff'd 23 St. Rep. 732,
and 414 N. Y. 399.
Fell through opening in stairway while landing.
Holland v. Mayor, etc. of New York, 16 Daly, 124; 30
St. Rep. 850; g Supp. 499; aff'd 129 N. Y. 674.
Hole in pier; boy drowned.
Ahern v. Steele, 48 Hun, 517; is St. Rep. 24; 1 Supp.
259; which rev. 7 St. Rev. 416, and 26 Week. Dig.
474; rev. 26 St. Rep. 295, and 115 N. Y. 203; dist. 72
~Hun, 472, and 54 St. Rep. 783, and 25 Supp. 247.
Fell through hole in pier.
Gluck v. Ridgewood Ice Co., 31 St. Rep. 99; 9 Supp.
254; aff'd 35 St. Rep. 995, and 125 N. Y. 728.
Skid fell on child picking up chips on pier.
Gernau v. Oceanic St. Nav. Co., 50 St. Rep. 156; 21
Supp. 371; 54 St. Rep. 936; aff'd 58 St. Rep. 865, and
141 N. Y. 588.
Infant fell through unguarded hole.
Delaney v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 78 Hun, 393; 60 St.
Rep. 785; 29 Supp. 226; aff’d 144 N. Y. 718,
Pile of pipes fell on person lawfully on pier.
Dunn v. Ballantyne, 5 App. Div. 483; 38 Supp. 1102,