Lo es Roz ae CORNELL UNIVERSITY. RL THE KHoswell P. Flower Library THE GIFT OF ROSWELL P. FLOWER FOR THE USE OF THE N. Y. STATE VETERINARY COLLEGE. 1897 oO D ea | XQ => 2 | Zz THE PRIMITIVE NATURALIST. 1 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS NG so GOP, BEING SOME ix yey / FAMILIAR STUDIES IN EVOLUTION ( usr LleRaay. \ t Kp ~ ae Nar E vet LOUIS ROBINSON M.D., Etc. WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCXCVII 1 Fe re \ - Ré6E No | Tl a Pie Poy E. Ir is my hope that this book will be of some service as an introduction to the study of Evolu- tion. Not a few people who have a taste for Natural History seem unable to grasp the ap- plication of the Darwinian doctrine to the every- day world about them, and I feel sure that many of these will thank me for showing how interesting some of the most trivial and common- place facts about animals become when viewed in this light. Several of the chapters have been founded upon articles which were written originally for young students in the United States and were published in the ‘North American Review.’ The greater part of that on Dogs appeared in the ‘Contemporary Review,’ under the title of vi PREFACE. “Canine Morals and Manners.” The rest have been chiefly evolved from papers contributed to ‘Blackwood’s Magazine. Although all have been entirely re-written, in the hope that they might thus be made more worthy to appear in book form, I have thought it best to retain the somewhat easy and colloquial tone adopted in the original articles. As far as I can see, this need not detract from the value of such a work to more serious students so long as all facts and infer- ences are set forth with the care and precision demanded by science. It will be seen by those who read the book that I have put forward several new and perhaps somewhat startling hypotheses. These I wish to be considered as standing only upon such facts as can be adduced in their support. Every reader is at liberty to form his own judgment as to the apparent “ protective mimicry” ex- hibited by the tabby cat, or as to the political significance of the white tail of the rabbit. Still, I think it is not improbable that many competent PREFACE. vil naturalists will agree with the views I have advanced. My thanks are due to the Editors of the Maga- zines and Reviews above mentioned for their courteous permission to republish the articles. I take this opportunity also of expressing my obligations to several friends who have criticised my work, both from the literary and scientific standpoints, and have enabled me to remove not a few serious defects. Especially do I thank Mr S. T. Dadd for the infinite pains he has taken in preparing the illustrations. In almost every instance (and in all where technical accuracy was important) the sketches were made direct from nature, and were submitted to competent authori- ties before they were finally completed. STREATHAM HILL, Lonpon, S.W., Oct. 4, 1897. CONTENTS, CHAP. I. INTRODUCTION . II. THE DOG Ill. THE HORSE IV. THE DONKEY V. DOMESTIC CATTLE VI. THE SHEEP VII, THE GOAT VIII. THE PIG IX. THE CAT. X. THE POULTRY-YARD CONCLUSION . INDEX . . . PAGE 68 109 130 161 ILLUSTRATIONS, FULL-PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS. THE PRIMITIVE NATURALIST : . . Frontispiece WILD DOGS. A STRATAGEM. ‘ 2 To face page 36 WILD HORSES PURSUED BY WOLVES : : " 68 WILD COW LEAVING HER CALF IN HIDING. . " 136 WILD SHEEP AT HOME ‘ 5 ; . " 164 iS} tN nN WILD SWINE RESCUING A COMRADE . A " ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT. PAGE VIGNETTE—FOX IN HORN. : : ; Title-page WAITING FOR A PASSPORT . ; : : ; 48 HOW THE OX LEARNED TO PULL. : : : 135 SEVEN YEARS’ OLD UNSHORN EWE . : 4 : 163 A HARD MASTER . : : : ; ; 181 KIDS CLIMBING SHAFTS OF ROLLER ‘ : ; 190 GREY AND TABBY CATS 236 BOA AND OCELOT 242 “1s 1T A SNAKE?” 259 TAILPIECE 326 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. In spite of the immense stimulus which Darwin- ism has given to the study of Natural History, I am afraid that hitherto it has proved rather a stumbling-block than a help to a large number of people who take an interest in such pursuits. Most of these belong to a class who take up some branch of natural history as a hobby for leisure hours. One hardly likes to speak of such students as amateurs; for the term generally savours of contempt when used in connection ‘th the arts and sciences. We owe so much to Observers, from Gilbert White downwards, to whom the study of animated nature has been A 2 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. chiefly a source of recreation, that it would be a great mistake either to hold their work cheap or to make their way needlessly difficult. When, therefore, the word “amateur” occurs in the succeeding pages, it is merely employed to dis tinguish naturalists of this order from those who have adopted the study of natural science as a profession. To acertain extent the untoward effect of the new doctrine on many of the older order of naturalists was inevitable. Our ideas concerning nature have been so revolutionised during the last generation, that one can hardly expect mature students to find themselves at home in their novel environment; while any attempts to patch the new doctrine on to the damaged remnants of the old, was like putting new cloth in an old garment. Although, as I shall point out later, the amateurs have themselves to blame to a certain extent, their hindrances have come largely from outside. In some directions the same fate seems to have overtaken the pursuits of the naturalist which in these strenuous days has overtaken various pop- ular sports. Professionalism has seized them for its own, and has established methods and stand- ards which are beyond the reach of any but the’ INTRODUCTION. 3 professional. The impetus given by the new doctrine has not only greatly multiplied the num- ber of earnest professional workers, but it has also increased the mass of our knowledge to such an extent that no little perseverance is necessary to enable a beginner to master the initial details of any branch of natural history in which he hopes to excel. It is one thing to cull fresh knowledge in the open fields, but it is quite another, and re- quires sterner stuff than a spirit of dilettanteism, to wrestle with dry bones and technicalities in a stuffy library or museum. Again, the increased energy given to research is rapidly using up a great deal of the material upon which our fathers busied themselves. Their happy hunting-grounds have been surveyed, mapped, and annexed by the speculative professor, and the fauna and flora thereon catalogued with a business-like precision which would do credit to an auctioneer. The naturalist who is content with merely collecting and classifying natural objects now finds that he must go very far afield if he is to be more than an imitator of other men’s labours. Furthermore, it must, I fear, be admitted that some things, which are not roses, have been strewed in the path of the amateur naturalist by 4 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. certain of his professional associates. This was probably more true ten years ago than it is to-day, and it is to be hoped that advancing civilisation will remove such causes of offence. But any one who has studied the habits of that uncompro- mising vertebrate, the Learned Official, when he deigns to mix with common folk at British Associ- ation meetings and elsewhere, will probably have observed that certain members of the order treat their less exalted fellow-workers with a somewhat disdainful patronage. Doubtless this is partly due to a temporary combination of youthfulness and authority among some of the leaders of the new movement, which has resulted from rapid pro- gress. But there seems also a tendency on the part of a larger number of professional naturalists to assume gwasz-manorial rights in certain regions of nature’s kingdom. It is apparently a natural law that wherever the members of a corporation become the licensed exponents of a subject— whether it be divinity, natural science, or what you will—they develop the spirit of the custodian, if not of the proprietor, and tend to regard all others who meddle with it with a certain amount of jealousy. But it will be a disastrous day for science if INTRODUCTION. 5 natural history ever becomes a close preserve of specialists and professors. For a brief review of the progress of knowledge in this direction shows that many of the most important discoveries have been made by the despised amateur. Further- more, it is from the ranks of these enthusiastic volunteers that by far the best material in the great army of regulars is recruited. The true naturalist, like the poet, is born, not made. No amount of scholastic hammering, or Government patronage, or societies for the organisation of re- search, can evolve a Cuvier or a Darwin. Yet if it be true that the old-fashioned amateur is trending towards extinction, he has chiefly him- self to thank. Should he fail to adapt himself to his changed environment, he must go the way of all flesh which has proved its unfitness in the struggle for existence. His chief weak point hitherto has been his lack of versatility. We shall find the cause of many failures in attempts to apply the principles of Darwinism in this want of power to accord with new conditions. In some cases it is evident that efforts to keep pace with the times have ended in confusion because there has been an attempt to pile new bricks upon an old and sapped foundation. In many others 6 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. failure has resulted because the knowledge of evolutionary laws has been merely theoretical and superficial. There has been an immense amount of literature upon the subject of Darwin- ism poured out during the last thirty years, much of it of a very speculative and evanescent char- acter. One can hardly wonder, therefore, if many students are somewhat bewildered as a result of trying to inform themselves from such sources. If the amateur naturalist is to profit by the new doctrine his information must be thorough and based upon experience, even al- though it may not be extensive. When we are going to make use of knowledge for some prac- tical purpose, we generally find that it is necessary to have a much more thorough grip of our subject than can be gained from studying verbal state- ments and formule. It is often absolutely impos- sible to obtain from books the kind of knowledge which is demanded in practice. What traveller about to undertake an expedition in which a knowledge of horsemanship or cycling was neces- sary, could expect to reach his goal if he contented himself with reading exhaustive treatises on these arts? The very act of walking, which we deem so simple, would, if taught in an abstract and aca- INTRODUCTION. 7 demic way, tax the faculties of a Newton or a Kelvin. I once knew a learned gentleman—no longer young—who felt it advisable to add pro- ficiency in dancing to his many attainments. Not wishing to make himself ridiculous by practising before others, he shut himself up in his study and bent his whole soul upon a handbook professing to teach such accomplishments. He had abilities of no mean order, and had already gained fame as a physicist; but after puzzling out—with the aid of intricate diagrams—all the mysteries of the guadrille, he stuck at the poxs astnorum (or shall we say chévaux de frise ?) of the dancers, and con- fessed that the whole thing was utterly beyond him. What would have happened if, at the risk of a mental breakdown, he had persevered to the end and had then appeared in a ballroom, I will leave to the imagination of my readers. But if there are a good many amateur natural- ists whose knowledge of evolution is too imperfect to be of any practical value, there are probably still more who may be said to possess none at all. If any one doubts this statement, let him com- mence a discussion on Darwinism with any aver- age schoolboy, sportsman, or country parson, and it will meet with abundant support. I mention 8 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. these three classes because from them, probably more than from any others one can name, are drawn the people who make a hobby of some branch of natural history. The failure of the schoolboy is owing partly to the inveterate con- servatism of our educational methods, and partly to the slovenly way in which science is still taught in schools. To the sportsman, as a rule, reading is uncongenial; and books bristling with new and technical terms and full of half-digested theories are an abomination. As to the average country parson, he still seems to think not only that the Darwinian theory is a disputable doctrine, but that, unless filtered and diluted by ecclesiastical wisdom, it smacks of infidelity. By-and-by, when doctrines which are still novel to most people (although forty years old, and to many of us as much a matter of course as the laws of gravitation) find a place in the elements of knowledge absorbed by every youth, we may expect most of these difficulties to disappear. But in the meantime they may be depriving us of some second Gilbert White, who, from his country parsonage, might send us news of a thousand delightful and invaluable facts which would be beyond the reach of any but a cultured observer who lives among the fields and woods. ® INTRODUCTION. 9 For the latter day Gilbert White must be an evolutionist down to the tips of his toes. The Darwinian way must be as familiar to him as the footpath from his rectory to his church. His very spectacles must be tinged with the doctrine, and his mind must employ its methods as easily as his lungs breathe the air. There is every reason to hope that the future will bring us seers of this type, and it is with the desire that I may in some slight measure hasten their advent that I here invite attention to the light which Darwinism throws upon the everyday world about us. It will be a good way to show how wonderfully the amateur student may gain both in pleasure and knowledge from the new philosophy—and at the same time will be consistent with the methods I am recommending—if we briefly discuss some points in the natural history of the naturalist himself. Undoubtedly his passion for outdoor life, and for watching and recording natural phe- nomena, dates back to the time when the exist- . ence of our forefathers depended upon success in hunting. We are all of us aware that only a few thousand years ago the ancestors of the modern European and American had only reached a stage of culture still found among savages which depend entirely upon the chase. Plentiful evidences are 10 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. discovered in limestone caves, in the banks of ancient rivers, and in the shell-mounds around the Danish coast, that prehistoric Europeans lived almost precisely the life now lived by the Fuegians or the Australian blacks. But few of us, I imagine, have realised the enormous length of the epoch throughout which this stage of utter savagery lasted. It is utterly impossible to measure its length in years; but every geologist and anthropologist will support me when I say that, when compared with the historical period, it was of inconceivable duration. Probably it would be no exaggeration to say that if you took the last leaf of this book as representing the era of civilisation, you might take all the other leaves as representing, in equal proportion, different stages of the epoch of pristine savagery. Now since man had to live by the chase, and by the chase only, throughout the greater part of this period, it is no wonder that all his faculties of mind and body became moulded to the environment of the hunter. To such primitive savages the habits of taking note of everything around them and of drawing conclusions from what they observed were absolutely essential. Under the immemo- rial régzme of the Stone Ages these were just INTRODUCTION. II as much duszness habits as are those which now lead to success in any branch of commerce. Indeed they were even more so, for nowadays if one becomes bankrupt there are many mitigat- ing circumstances; but in prehistoric times there were no poor laws or charities, and failure in business meant extinction. Even the miscarriage of a single enterprise, such as the throwing of a spear at a cave-bear or a bison, often involved a death penalty. We owe our instinctive liking and aptitude for naturalising in the open air to the fact that the practical study of natural history was at one time of saving value to our race. Not only did such accomplishments stave off imminent death —as when the recognition of a footprint or a faint sound in the forest told of the presence of some terrible enemy—but they acted surely if slowly in many other ways to the advantage of their pos- sessor. Among the Esquimaux the hunter who could be depended upon to bring home his seal at the end of a day’s business on the ice-floe could not only have the pick of the girls in marriage, but gained other privileges which tend to make a family prosperous. Now let us inquire somewhat more in detail as 12 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. to the faculties which every savage hunter must possess in order to be successful. First of all, he must have a general knowledge of natural phe- nomena, accurate and inconceivably extensive ; so that when he is afield, every item among his innumerable surroundings is so familiar that the least unusual circumstance at once arrests his attention. Next, he must have acquired, in ad- dition to his general knowledge, a complete mas- tery of the complex arts of tracking and stalking, so that he may approach near enough to his wary game for his rude weapons to take effect. If we go no further than this, we find that the untutored savage in his native wilds almost comes up to that formula which defines culture as ‘‘ knowing something of everything and everything of some- J thing.” But other gifts are required beyond mere knowledge and skill. There must be an infinite capacity for taking pains (which has been given as a definition of genius), and also, and above all, there must be a power to reason accurately from the facts observed. I think that many people who have spoken with contempt of the mental capacity of the Bosjesmen and the Black Fellow can never have estimated the men- tal resources required for ordinary “spooring.” INTRODUCTION. 13 Each minute item of evidence — often so faint that civilised senses can no more apprehend it than the unassisted eye can detect the microbes in a drop of water—has not only to be observed but to be weighed, and given its exact value in a long and intricate argument. If I may be allowed to digress from the ‘“‘spoor” of our present argument for a moment, I should like to point out what seems to have been one exceedingly important factor in the development of the human intellect. In the next chapter I shall discuss, in comparing a man’s mental processes with a dog’s, the probable psychic effect of the comparative size of the olfactory lobe. \ mean by the olfactory lode that part of the brain—so remarkably developed in the canide — which receives impressions from the nerves of smell. Now why has man no olfactory lobe to speak of? And what may possibly be the outcome of the deficiency? The answer to the first question is, that man’s progenitors were fruit - eating creatures which lived in trees. Now a frugivor- ous animal obviously does not need a keen power of scent for detecting and following prey. It usually discovers its food by means of the eye, 14 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. and one finds that Nature has adapted herself to this state of things by making most fruits of con- spicuous colours. Although this may partly ex- plain why man and all the apes have the organ of smell so very slightly developed, it is plain that hereditary vegetarianism will not fully account for their olfactory poverty. For we find that very many graminivorous animals—such as antelopes, deer, wild horses, and wild cattle—have an ex- ceedingly acute power of scent, and can detect the approach of an invisible enemy at several hundred yards’ distance. But a little thought will show that the life of a creature living high in the trees is never threatened by a foe approaching stealthily from afar off, and hence such a means of protection is unnecessary. And, moreover, in such a situation this sense would be very untrustworthy, for air among the tree-tops moves in eddies and veering gusts, owing to the continual obstructions it meets with, and hence would not tell the direc- tion from which the taint of danger came. Now when man left his trees and his vegetarianism behind him and became an amateur carnivore, there was this great distinction between him and the predatory beasts whose habits he was imitat- ing—viz., that wheréas they were able both to INTRODUCTION. 15 detect and to follow their quarry by scent, he found his nose practically of no use as an aid to a living. Had he developed, during his early earth-walking career, olfactory powers anything like equal to those of the dog, I make bold to say that all of us, if we were now existing, would be getting our livings by sniffing for roots and grubs like a badger, or by yelping along a trail like a pack of jackals! Because, happily, he could not profitably follow his nose, primitive man was obliged to exercise his wits. Where the dog or the wolf gallops blindly and without thought along the tainted line left by the feet of his quarry, the primeval hunter had, from the first, not only to learn to notice each displaced twig, or shifted stone, or shaken dew-drop, but had also—from these and a thousand other data —to infer what had passed that way, when it had passed, and often, in the case of one wounded animal in a herd, “ow it had passed, and whether it were sufficiently disabled to make pursuit a profitable speculation. As far as I can see, this faculty, engendered and necessitated by olfactory shortcomings, formed the basis of much of our vaunted reasoning power. When we analyse, not only the hobby of the 16 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. naturalist, but almost any other form of pastime, we find that it is founded upon certain primitive tastes or instincts which we possess in common with the uncivilised races, Civilised man when at play always reverts somewhat towards the condition of the savage. The play instinct is one of the characteristics of immaturity, and most of our efforts at recre- ation involve attempts to revive or prolong the youthful spirit. Now all young creatures, whether of our own species or not, tend both in bodily structure and in mental attributes to resemble remote ancestors. Who can doubt that the passionate delight in “killing something” displayed by so many of the more vigorous specimens of our race is traceable to the old destructive instincts which all savages possess in common with their chosen exemplars, the Carnivora ? Having traced the impulse both of the sports- man and the field- naturalist to their pristine basis, let us endeavour to picture one of our prehistoric ancestors engaged in his everyday pursuits; and we shall, I think, get a hint from him as to the way in which the Darwinian doc- trine may greatly enhance the value of natural INTRODUCTION. Ty, history as a source of recreation. As I have said above, we are able, with a fair amount of certainty, to reproduce the savage European of ancient days by comparing him with modern primitive races with whom the traveller and the anthropologist have made us well acquainted. Probably if any difference existed other than that of colour between the earliest Britons or Frenchmen of whom we have any traces, and the American or Australian aborigines, it was in the direction of a greater doggedness of char- acter, and perhaps of a superiority in reasoning from the evidence of the senses. The sun has risen over the great eastern plain that now constitutes the German Ocean. From his dwelling-place, consisting of a river- side cave, the entrance of which is closed by roughly interlaced branches, strides our primi- tive forefather. He is a brawny, hirsute savage, hard-featured and ruddy like a modern tramp, with his face and naked limbs stippled over with tattoo-marks. His dress, such as it is, is made of skins of the deer and wild cat, and is drawn together by a belt holding a flint axe. In his hand is his bow, and hanging behind his left shoulder a rough quiver of flint-tipped B 18 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. arrows. After a keen look at the sky and up and down the valley, he moves stealthily away among the bracken and brambles towards a spot where the spotted deer of the forest are wont to drink at the stream. As he steps silently along, his eyes and ears are alert for the least indication of the presence of prey or of danger- ous neighbours. A hundred facts have already been observed and commented upon (although perhaps unconsciously) before he arrives at the river-bank. He has, in fact, during this short ‘journey to business” been reading his morning paper, including the Weather Forecast, the News of the Night, and the State of the Markets as they affect his own special calling. As in the case with most of us when we read our modern newspapers, many of the items displayed before his eyes do not awake any interest. For in- stance, the varnished petals of the buttercups which reflect the golden sunlight are there to catch the attention of the wild bees which are already fussing around them. Such advertise- ments do not concern him at all, and he does not trouble himself about them any more than we trouble ourselves about wants of people with whom we have no points of contact. As he INTRODUCTION. 19 nears the trampled spot where the thirsty herds approach the water, he hears the shrill cackle of a blackbird away in the forest some two hundred paces beyond the deer-path, and the screech of a jay accompanied by the warning “pink pink” of a pair of chaffinches coming from a spot nearer to him. Instantly he slips behind the bole of a tree and stands motionless and alert, with an arrow upon the string, for he has re- ceived sure intelligence that some beast of prey is prowling near, and it is necessary that he should gain the fullest information before pro- ceeding. As he stands there, still as the tree- trunks about him, do you imagine that his mind (although the nearest alphabet is ten thousand years off in the future) is sluggish or inactive ? It would be well for us if we could bring such keen and apposite thoughts to bear upon our avocations whenever we wished as those which are now coursing through his brain! A dozen different theories, suggested by the signs, are being sifted with lightning rapidity and with masterly discretion by the machinery inside of that rugged, weather-beaten head. At the same moment every faculty is keenly astretch for further information which may aid in the con- 20 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. clusion he must come to before he stirs hand or foot. Is it merely a belated fox slinking home to his earth in the oak-grove? He knows that fox well and all his kindred within an area of several square miles. Or is some larger and more terrible beast, some huge brindled mzachaz- rodus, or cave-bear, prowling among the woods in front of him? Within a few minutes, while he stands there scarcely moving an eyelid, he has received reports enough from the disturbed birds and beasts in the valley to fill a column in the ‘Times. By comparing the different notes of alarm which reach his ears he learns at length that there are two sources of provo- cation afoot: one is comparatively near to him, and is merely a fox or wild cat, he cannot tell which — for the chaffinches and the jays have the same name for both; but the other, where first he heard the blackbird’s vehement outcry, is a larger beast, which, from the shifting cries of protest, seems passing slowly down the river- bank. As far as he can judge, considering its beat and the time of day, it is a sabre-toothed tiger on the prowl for deer. These conclusions have been come to, not only through the gather- ing of innumerable facts, but by means of elab- INTRODUCTION. 2I orate logical processes, and a power of judging the comparative value of evidence which would do credit to a modern Lord Chancellor. At length he cautiously moves forward and comes upon the slot of the antlered herd. A glance tells him that they have been startled before reaching the brook, and have made their way at headlong speed back into the forest. Further scrutiny of the ground reveals the fact that a huge machairodus has leaped from behind a bush, has clawed the flank of one deer without seizing it, and after galloping clumsily some twenty yards after the herd, has given up the pursuit, and turned down the river-bank in the direction from whence came the blackbird’s shriek of warning. The keen eyes of the savage wander over the ground in search of one further piece of evidence of the utmost importance. At length he sees where the hoof of a flying hind has displaced a pebble. Bend- ing down and shading his eyes from the dazzling sunlight, he examines the damp surface of the stone intently; and when he rises, ten seconds later, he could tell you, if you were to ask him, that the events recorded in the writing on the ground happened almost exactly half an hour 22 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. before he arrived at the spot! If he were ready to reveal his methods, you would probably learn that in making this calculation he took account of the temperature of the air, the direction of the wind, the character of the pebble and of the soil in which it had lain embedded. Plainly such problems could not be solved with success without an immense and most accurate know- ledge of natural phenomena, an alert imagination, and logical ability of no mean order. We will now wish him “good hunting,” and return across the centuries. For, although it would be very interesting to accompany him on his day’s round and watch his method of getting a living, we have “other fish to fry,” and having, I think, captured what we want for the purpose during our early excursion, we will no longer embarrass our archaic progenitor with our clumsy civilised ways. Whether or no this imaginary family portrait is correct in its details, I think we may be tolerably positive as regards one particular. It was an invariable and essential mental habit with him not only to gather facts, but to read their meaning, both immediate and_ remote. Now, if we are justified in ascribing the delight INTRODUCTION. 23 which the study of natural history gives to the fact that, when we are engaged in such pursuits, we are obeying an inherent impulse derived from our innumerable hunting ancestors, it follows that the more closely such primitive instincts are obeyed the more enjoyment will the naturalist be likely to get from his pursuits. If, in addition to merely collecting specimens and classifying them, we are able like our skin-clad forefathers to regard each item as part of an argument or a narrative, we shall reawaken more fully the keen delight in outdoor pursuits which was the daily portion of the savage. Now this is exactly what Darwinism has enabled us to do. Even if we are among those who go no further than did most of the older naturalists, and content ourselves with merely observing and recording, our pursuits gain in- finitely in zest. For the most trivial scrap of knowledge, which at one time would only have been one more item added to the chaotic dust- heap of useless lore, may now turn out to be a diamond beyond price. Many times of late years has some small and apparently valueless discovery enabled the man of science to establish some widely reaching law. No single character 24 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. in the book of nature is without its meaning, and even when the key to her cipher is not yet in our hands, the astonishing progress which has been made during a single generation makes it probable that we have only to wait and to labour awhile longer to be able to read the wondrous tale. Darwinism has done more in this way for the naturalist than the spectroscope has done for the astronomer, or the discovery of the cuneiform alphabet for the archeologist. As yet we are only stumbling among the elements of the new method, but already it is often possible, by exercising our reasoning faculty and our know- ledge of natural laws when observing the most commonplace phenomena, to see in them a revelation of the past which was utterly beyond the reach of our fathers. Yet it must never be forgotten that if our attempts to interpret nature’s hieroglyphics are not based upon extensive and accurate know- ledge, we shall run the same risk of coming to wrong conclusions as would the savage if he were not thoroughly versed in all phases of his wild surroundings. It is necessary to keep a constant check upon the innate propensity to draw inferences from whatever we see or think INTRODUCTION, 25 we see. One finds that this habit of the human mind is curiously automatic: for constantly when we are in a ‘‘brown study,” and even when we are asleep, we find that attempts are being made, although often of a vague and fatuous kind, to give reasons for what chances to be occupying the attention. The fact that this habit is uni- versal among mankind, and that it is also innate and automatic, asserts its extreme antiquity. Probably in it we find the actual merging point of instinct and reason. Like many other mental and moral attributes which have come down to us from the remote past, it is liable to get us into grave trouble if not controlled by the most vigilant discipline. Regarded in the light of a very raw recruit, with Logic—that stern martinet of the Intelligence Department—ever at its elbow, it is still capable of rendering useful service. The danger which besets us in accepting any plausible explanation of phenomena without sub- jecting it to the most searching criticism is not death or wounds, as in the case of a primitive hunter who formed a hasty and erroneous judg- ment, but it is one which will certainly cripple us as naturalists. 26 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. Self-contradictory as the statement may appear, what is common and obvious is often much more mysterious and wonderful than what is rare. We are so in the habit of taking circumstances in our everyday surroundings for granted, that a very great deal entirely escapes notice which offers most fruitful ground for research. Do we not constantly see, when some great invention or discovery is announced, that the thing has all the time been almost before our eyes, and that it is of the most ridiculously simple character ! Within the last few years many of us learned with astonishment that air contained a new ele- ment in addition to nitrogen and oxygen. Yet for generations hundreds of able chemists have not only been breathing air but have been con- tinually working upon it in their laboratories. And furthermore, when the facts and methods which led to the discovery of argon were an- nounced, it seemed astonishing to every student of chemistry that since the time when Cavendish first drew attention to ‘residual nitrogen” not one of these experimenters has apprehended a truth which was all but naked before their eyes. Although in the year 1777 Gilbert White drew attention to the remarkable influence of earth- INTRODUCTION. 27 worms in “boring, perforating, and loosening the soil, and in throwing up such infinite num- ber of lumps of earth called wormceasts, which is a fine manure for grain and grass,” and although he said, furthermore, “a good Monograph of Worms would afford much entertainment and information at the same time, and would open to a new and large field on Natural History,” it was not until more than a century had elapsed that Darwin’s work on ‘ The Formation of Vege- table Mould through the Action of Worms’ was published. Yet all the time, in every field, abundant evidence of the influence of worms was displayed before the eyes of naturalists in the shape of hundreds of tons of earth raised to the surface in the form of wormcasts. I make bold to say that, in like manner, most of the future discoveries of great moment to the naturalist will be made, not in the remote and minute ramifications of science such as are occupy- ing the attention of so many of our learned in- vestigators, but among the everyday phenomena which are open to the eyes of all. It is in this truth (for truth is scarcely too strong a word when all past experience declares and confirms the rule) that the hope of the amateur naturalist 28 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. lies. The present writer, although he has never been able to give much time to any branch of study outside his profession, has been fortu- nate enough to light upon several facts both in physiology and general natural history which had escaped the attention of abler students. In addition to these he has chanced upon a hundred curious hints and clues which may be regarded as “spoor” leading possibly towards the lair of more important quarry. And although prob- ably many wild hypotheses so started will, when finally run down, prove of little material profit either to their captor or to science, yet the zest such pursuits give to the study of natural history is not only traceable to primeval methods of getting a livelihood, but still takes no contempt- ible place among the things which make life worth living. le ee ly THE DOG. Most of our domestic animals have become modi- fied by changed circumstances since we took them into partnership even more than we have our- selves: they have, in fact, become partakers with us of the advantages and disadvantages of our civilisation. This is especially so in the case with the dog, man’s closest associate and earliest ally. Still we can trace nearly every trait in the dog which proves of use to us nowadays to a time when he lived a life of complete in- dependence, and managed his own affairs without the aid of a human partner or director. We must remember that although the dog is now our especial friend, with interests in the main in harmony with ours, he was not always so. The wild dog and wild man might have 30 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. been chance allies when, for instance, a fatigued quarry pursued by the pack was struck down by a flint weapon, and the greater part of the carcass left to the original hunters; or when a wounded animal escaped its human foe to be followed up and devoured by the dogs. But, as a rule, the interests of dog and man would be conflicting, as is still the case where wild dogs exist, such as the dingoes of Australia, the dholes of India, and the hyena-like wild dogs of Central and Southern Africa. It must be borne in mind that in dealing with these primitive canine creatures, the word ‘‘dog”’ is used in its widest sense, and must include such animals as wolves and jackals, which undoubtedly share in the ancestry of our familiar domestic breeds. Probably the partnership first began through small helpless whelps being brought home by the early hunters, and being afterwards cared for and brought up by the women and children. The indifference with which almost all savages regard their dogs seems to negative the idea that primitive man took the trouble to tame and train adult wild animals of this kind for his own purposes. The young dog would form one of THE DOG. 31 the family, and would unconsciously regard him- self as such. The reason why he should so regard himself will be discussed later, when we come to consider the probable canine view of the relationship. It would soon be found that his hunting in- stinct was of use to his captors, for while wander- ing abroad with them, his keen nose would detect the presence of hidden game when the eyes of his savage masters failed to perceive it; and when a wounded animal dashed away, his speed and instinct for following a trail by scent would often secure what would otherwise have been lost. The dog, in his turn, would find an easier living and a better shelter while associated with man than if he were hunting on his own account, and thus the compact would be cemented by mutual benefits. Now let us consider why the dog should so readily fall into the position of the companion and subordinate of man. What “stock and good- will” did he bring into the partnership besides his swiftness and powers of scenting and seizing his quarry? Let us look for a moment at his life at home as apart from his duties while hunting. In the first place, he evidently regards the dwelling 32 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. of his master as his own place of abode in which he has certain vested interests, and while he is complaisant and submissive to the regular inhabi- tants, he looks upon strangers of all kinds with suspicion, and regards their intrusion as an in- fringement of his rights, or contrary to his sense of what is lawful. Although watch-dogs have doubtless been valued for many generations, and their distinctive qualities cultivated by artificial selection, it seems clear that here we are dealing with an original instinct. The pariah dogs of Constantinople and other Eastern cities, which are practically as untamed as their fellow-scavengers, the vultures, crows, and jackals, and which probably have only in the slightest degree ever come under direct human influence, have the same habit. Each street is the recognised dwelling-place of an irregular pack, and dogs—and in some cases even men —from other quarters are warned off or at- tacked if they cross the boundary. It is said also that the wild dogs of India will drive off a tiger if he strays into the neigh- bourhood of their chosen habitat. Even tame wolves will, without being taught, threaten a stranger if he comes near their master’s house, THE DOG. 33 but will take no notice of the coming and go- ing of the regular inmates. It would seem, therefore, that the watch- dog’s peculiar virtue is directly traceable to the. old instinct for guarding the lair of the pack. And in following this instinct, the dog indicates that it is not his custom to act single-handed. The very fact that he growls or barks at a stranger shows that a vocal intimation to his fellows of the presence of a possible enemy is part of his plan. Every one has noticed that the barking of one dog will set off others with- in hearing, so that on a still night an alarm at one spot will disturb a whole suburb. Al- though no wolves or wild dogs are known to bark in the true canine manner, it is impos- sible to imagine that so distinct and almost universal a habit of the domestic varieties can have been deliberately initiated by man. Sev- eral instances are recorded of Eskimo dogs, and even dingoes and wolves, learning to bark by spontaneous imitation of domestic dogs. Foxes make a noise very like barking when they chal- lenge one another among the hills at night, and it is not difficult to provoke an answer by im- itating the sound under appropriate conditions. Cc 34 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. It seems probable, therefore, that the common ancestor of our domestic dogs and their wild relatives, which no doubt lived under some- what different conditions from any modern wild or feral creatures of the kind, was a barking animal. As I have already said, the very fact that the dog barks when alarmed is an indication that he is a creature of gregarious instincts, and that he is accustomed to act in concert with others. The sound is a signal to his comrades as well as a threat to the intruder. If this be not so, what can be the meaning and intention of the different tones he adopts according to the nature of the provocation, which are capable of conveying to ears afar off an idea of the measure and near- ness of the danger? Most of our domestic animals, and_all which act under our orders and give us willing obedi-_ ence, are gregarious in their habits when in the wild state. A little thought will show that many of the qualities for which we prize them are dependent upon this fact, and that we are the gainers by turning to our own use the stock of tribal virtues and morals which they bring with them into our service,—just in the same way as THE DOG. ° ae we gain by appropriating the winter food-store of the bees, and the supply of starch and gluten laid up for future use by many plants. An animal of a troop has perforce certain social duties and obligations which, as can be shown, are necessary for his own existence as well as for the welfare of the community. He must learn to give and take, and be prepared to follow and obey the members of greater capacity and experience. It is essential that he should be of a peaceable disposition, as a general rule, among his mates, so as to preserve the harmony of the band; since a pack of dogs— like a house — divided against itself will soon prove its unfitness, and be eliminated according to law. He must also be prepared to stand by his fellows, defend them or any of them if at- tacked, and warn them if danger approaches. Seeing that most wild animals of the canine tribe prey upon quarry swifter and larger than themselves, their common welfare depends upon systematic and intelligent co-operation. A single hound following a trail by scent will frequently be at a loss, for every now and then it will over-run and miss the line; but when several are together this will seldom happen, and the pace of the pursuit will consequently be much 36 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. greater and the chance of a meal more certain. In searching for prey it is necessary for the pack to separate, so as to range a wider area; but the instant a ‘‘find” takes place it is important that all should be informed at once, so that a united pursuit may be taken up while the scent is warm. Among all hounds and many wild dogs the signal is given by the voice; but, as will be shown later, the dog has another and very perfect method of signalling in addition to this. For the canine tail, when considered philosophically, turns out to be nothing but an animated semaphore, by means of which important news can be tele- graphed to the rest of the pack in much the same way aS messages are exchanged between different detachments of an army by the modern development of military signalling popularly known as “ flag-wagging.” Of course in hunting all large and swift animals, a great deal can be done by strategy; and this involves a common plan of action, often of an elaborate kind, and the giving and taking of orders by the leaders and other members of the band respectively. The value of quick percep- tion and general intelligence, as well as of a readiness to co-operate, here at once become WNAOVIVALS VO ‘Sood GIL THE DOG. 37 apparent, for without these qualities no such combination could be successfully carried out. Again, when the prey is within reach, it often requires the united efforts of the whole pack, acting intelligently in concert, to pull it down. If a number of wolves or wild dogs were scattered over a district, each acting for himself independ- ently, as cats do, large animals, such as the elk or bison, would be of no use to them as articles of diet, and they might starve in the midst of plenty. But if they combine and act under the guidance of experienced leaders, they can at once utilise what would else be, in canine economy, a waste product. As has been pointed out, this indispensable co- operation at once involves the elements of politics and morals. The obedience of the young and inexperienced to their leaders, and the observance of certain rules of conduct, are a swe gud non of the success of any strategic combination. It follows, therefore, that the young of gre- garious animals of all kinds, and especially those of this type, are submissive and teachable, and have thus the very qualities we desire in creatures which are to be trained for our special use. In fact, we have here the natural basis for that 38 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. docility and readiness to obey which is such a noticeable and invaluable characteristic in dogs as we know them. They must also be faithful to their fellows in word and deed. A hound which gives tongue when he has no quarry before him (and such canine liars are not unknown, as any huntsman will testify) may spoil a day’s hunt, and send the whole pack supperless to bed. It is interesting and amusing to observe the evident contempt with which the hounds of a pack regard an un- truthful member. His failing becomes perfectly well known, and, let him bay as he will, not one of his companions will rush to the spot as they do the moment they hear the slightest whimper from a trusted and experienced finder. Loyalty to one another is also a virtue which cannot be done without. Thus we see that, how- ever great the emulation between the individual members of the band, while the hunt is on it is kept strictly within bounds, and is subordinated to the common purpose. It is only after the game is captured and killed that contests of in- dividuals for a share of the plunder commence. The very fact that an invitation is given to join in the pursuit as soon as the quarry is started, THE DOG. 39 instead of the finder stealing off after it on his own account, is an illustration of this; and if one of the pack is attacked by the hunted animal at bay or by an enemy, his howls and excited outcry are instantly responded to by all within hearing. Every one has noticed the uncontrollable power of this instinct when the yells and shrieks of a canine street-brawl are heard. Dogs from all sides rush to the spot and immediately take part in the quarrel. The result generally is a confused free fight of a very irregular description, and each dog is apparently ready to bite any of the others. It will easily be seen that this confusion is owing to a disarrangement of natural politics, caused by the disturbing and arbitrary influence of human institutions. If two of the combatants happen to be comrades, they will hold together and treat all the rest as enemies. In the wild state the sound of strife would mean either a faction fight or a combat with some powerful enemy of the pack ; and probably in the former case every dog within hearing would be a member of one or other of the contending parties. By adopting dogs into our families, and separating them from their fellows, we upset canine political economy in many ways; 40 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. but still the old loyal instinct to rush to the sup- port of supposed friends in distress is so strong, that a lady’s pug has been known to spring from a carriage to take part in a scrimmage between two large collies. Among wild dogs the prosperity of the com- munity might be fatally impaired by a lapse of this instinctive loyalty. All who have had to do with hounds know that every pack contains cer- tain individuals whose special talents are invalu- able to the rest. Generally one or two of a pack of beagles do most of the finding when driving rabbits in the furze, and in the case of a lost trail another individual will be, as a rule, the success- ful one in making skilful casts forward to pick up the line of scent. Another, again, will possess quicker vision and greater swiftness in running than the rest, and the instant the quarry comes into view will cease the more tedious method of following, and dash forward at full speed to seize it. Among wild dogs pursuing large and powerful game, the need and scope for such specialists would be even greater and more important. If one of these were lost through not being well backed up in time of peril, the whole pack would THE DOG. 4I be the sufferers in a very material degree; for it would often fail to start, or lose during pursuit, some animal which might otherwise have been captured. The study of this communal canine morality is very interesting when considered along with Mr Herbert Spencer’s theories of ethics. It is here dwelt upon, however, merely to explain on scientific principles many traits of our domestic dogs, which (as is too commonly the case with those who receive benefits) we are liable to profit by and take for granted. The great naturalist Cuvier observed that all animals that readily enter into domestication con- sider man as a member of their own society, and thus fulfil their instinct of association. The pro- bable view of the fox-terrier or the dachshund which lies upon our hearthrug, therefore, is that he is one of a pack, the other members of which are the human inhabitants of the house. Most interesting would it be, were it possible, to get the dog’s precise view of the situation. The chief bar to our doing so is owing to the difficulty of putting our human minds, even in imagination, within the restricting limits of the canine thinking apparatus. Thus we constantly 42 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. see, when anecdotes of the cleverness of dogs are told, that the narrator is quite unable, in estimat- ing the supposed motives and mental processes, to get out of himself sufficiently to escape the inveterate tendency to anthropomorphism; and he almost invariably gives the dog credit for faculties which it is very doubtful if it possesses. When we come to consider how few persons have that power of imaginative sympathy with their own kind which enables us to see to some extent through another's mental spectacles, it is no matter for surprise that a human being should generally fail in trying to think like a dog. Thinking, after all, is, like flying, an organic process dependent in every case on actual physi- cal machinery; and dissimilarity of brain structure therefore absolutely precludes us from seeing eye to eye, mentally, with the lower animals. Often when we are dealing with the relation between peculiarities of brain structure and special mental attributes, we are obliged to depend to a great degree upon conjecture, because the func- tions of the brain as the organ of mind are so little understood. But here it is possible to point out one of the real reasons why mental furniture in dogs and men differs so essentially. If you THE DOG. 43 examine a human brain you will find that the parts which first receive impressions from the nerves of smell are very small and rudimentary ; but in the dog these olfactory lobes are large and full of ganglia which are connected by innumer- able telegraphic fibres with the main hemispheres of the brain. Hence most of the information we gather comes in through the channels of the other senses, and our ideas of external things are but little based upon the presentation of them offered by the organs of smell. The dog, on the con- trary, forms his notion of the outside world more from impressions gathered in this way than in any other. He may be said, indeed, to think through his nose. Now we are able in some degree to understand what an influence this might have upon the whole process of thought when we observe the great difference between ideas concerning external things gathered by people who have all their senses and by those who are absolutely blind or deaf. For when the optic nerve hands in nothing whatever to the brain, all the innumerable phases of the external world which can reach us only through the eye can play no part in any of the psychic functions. And in the case of a person 44 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. born deaf the same may be said of those im- pressions conveyed by the auditory nerve, upon which most of us depend so much in gaining knowledge. But this structural difference of brain, with its inevitable consequences, although it balks us in one way, comes to our aid in another. As has been said, our custom of ascribing human faculties and modes of thought is an involuntary and invariable one when we are dealing with the mental processes of other beings. Even when we speak of the supernatural the same habit is manifest, and human passions, emo- tions, and weaknesses are constantly ascribed to beings presumed to be infinitely more re- mote from us in power and knowledge than we are from the dog. Thus we see, in the not very distant past, roasted flesh and fruits were thought by men to be acceptable to deity, —doubtless because they were pleasing to the palates of the worshippers, who reasoned by analogy from the known to the unknown. This should teach us to bear in mind that there is, affecting the dog’s point of view, almost un- doubtedly such a thing as cyzomorphtsm, and that he has his peculiar and limited ideas of THE DOG. 45 life and range of mental vision, and therefore perforce makes his artificial surroundings square with them. It has been said that a man stands to his dog in the position of a god; but when we consider that our own conceptions of deity lead us to the general idea of an enormously powerful and omniscient #zaz, who loves, hates, desires, rewards, and punishes in human - like fashion, it involves no strain of imagination to conceive that from the dog’s point of view his master is an elongated and abnormally cunning dog,—of different shape and manners certainly from the common run of dogs, yet canine in his essential nature. The more one considers the matter, the more probable does this view become. If we, with our much wider range of mental vision, and infinitely greater imaginative grasp of remote possibilities, the result of our reading and ex- perience, are still bound by the tether of our own brain limits to anthropomorphic criteria when endeavouring to analyse superhuman ex- istences, still more is it likely that the dog, with his mere chink of an outlook on the small world around him, is completely hedged in by canine notions and standards when his mind 46 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. has to deal with creatures of higher and mys- terious attributes. At any rate, it will not be difficult to show that the dog’s habits are generally consistent with this hypothesis. As far as mental contact is concerned, he treats his master and the human members of the household as his com- rades, and behaves in many ways as if he were at home with the pack. Thus all the tribal virtues previously mentioned come into play. He guards the common lair and becomes a watch-dog, and by his barking calls his adopted brethren to his aid. He submits readily to the rules of the house, because an animal belong- ing to a community must be prepared to abide by certain laws which exist for the common good. He defends his master if attacked—or possibly, if not a courageous dog, gets up a vehement alarm to call others to his aid— because he has an instinctive knowledge of the importance of loyalty to a comrade, and_be- cause, as has been shown, loyalty to a leader is especially necessary. He is ready in under- standing and obeying orders, owing to the fact that, when acting in concert with wild com- panions, it was imperative that the young and THE DOG, 47 inexperienced should comprehend and fall in with the plans of the more intelligent veterans. The same ancestral habits and tendencies render him helpful as a sporting dog, and in herding or driving sheep or cattle. This last employ- ment is very much like a mild kind of hunting, under certain special rules and restrictions, and with the killing left out. It has been observed that the Indian dholes will patiently and slowly drive wild animals in the direction of their habi- tat during their breeding season before killing them, so as to have the meat close at home; and this could only be accomplished by the whole pack exercising a patient self-control, and by the leaders constantly keeping in check the fierce impulse of the younger members to rush in and kill the weary and bewildered quarry. The peaceable disposition and readiness to submit to discipline are also tribal virtues of which we take advantage. The dog, when he slinks away with drooping tail if reproved, or rolls abjectly over on his back and lies, paws upwards, a picture of complete submission, is still behaving to his master as his wild fore- father did to the magisterial leaders of the troop, or a victorious foe of his own species. 48 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. Jesse states that when a pariah dog of one of the Eastern cities desires to pass through a district inhabited by another pack, he skulks along in the humblest fashion with his tail de- pressed to the utmost, and on being challenged, rolls over, and there remains, limp and supine, Vatting for a passport. submissively awaiting leave to proceed. The same thing can be observed when a large and fierce dog makes a dash at a young and timid one. This expressive and unmistakable method of showing submission is calculated to disarm hostile feelings, and contributes to peace and THE DOG. 49 harmony, and therefore to the unity and pros- perity of the body politic. Although it would seem that the canine im- agination from its very feebleness transforms man into a dog, yet, as we should expect, argu- ing from the cynomorphic hypothesis, it does not stop here. In a most interesting account of the shepherd-dogs of the Argentine, given in ‘The Voyage of the Beagle,’ Darwin shows that, by a careful system of training, the herds- men have taught the dogs to regard their charges as fellows of the same pack with them- selves ; insomuch that a single dog, although he will flee from an enemy if alone, will, as soon as he reaches the flock to which he is at- tached, turn and face any odds, evidently with the notion that the helpless and frightened sheep ranged behind him are able to back him up just as if they were members of a canine regiment of which he was leader. The pas- sage is too long for quotation, but all who are interested in the subject should refer to it. An instance of the operation of the cyno- morphic idea can be seen in the behaviour of a dog when a bone is given to him. He will generally run off with it to some quiet spot, D 50 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. and is suspicious of every one who comes near him, evidently having the notion that what is to him a valuable possession is likely to be regarded as such by his human associates. Few dogs when gnawing a bone will allow even their masters to approach without showing signs of displeasure and a fear of being dispos- sessed of their property only consistent with the idea that the bipedal “dog” wants to gnaw the bone himself. Every one has noticed the elaborate prelim- inaries which go before a canine battle. Teeth are ostentatiously displayed, the animals walk on tiptoe round one another, and erect the hair on their backs as if each wished to give the impression that he was a very large and formidable dog, and one not to be encountered with impunity. Frequently hostilities go no further than this, one animal turning and re- tiring with a great show of dignity, but plainly with no wish to fight. When we come to analyse such proceedings, it will be seen that the ends of battle are often gained in a bloodless manner by this diplomatic exhibition of warlike preparations and capabilities. One primary object of a hos- THE DOG. 51 tile meeting between dogs (as well as between higher animals) is to decide a question of pre- cedence, either general or particular. Now, if we could only settle which was the best man in any dispute by duels @ outrance, a great deal of blood would be needlessly shed, and many valuable lives lost to the community. This introduction of moral weapons among social animals is therefore a great point gained, for injury to one is injury to all. The quick re- cognition of the superiority of a foe, and the perception of when submission should take the place of valour, is plainly of advantage to the individual, since a pig-headed obstinacy in re- sistance would frequently lead to elimination. Where in the serious business of life there is an interdependence of individuals associated for common ends, any influence which lessens the severity of civil conflicts tends to the general wellbeing. Just as commanding officers have forbidden duels between members of an army in the field, so nature has among gregarious animals, and more especially among formidable carnivores, discountenanced internecine conflicts which might weaken the general efficiency of the pack. 52 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. Few animals excel the dog in the power of expressing emotion. This power is a sure sign of an animal which is habitually in communica- tion with its fellows for certain common ends. Although probably long association with and selection by man have accentuated this faculty, a considerable share of it was undoubtedly there from the beginning, and was of service long before the first dog was domesticated. It is easy to see how important it is for the general good that the emotions of any one member of a pack of dogs should be known to the others. If, for instance, one of the band should perceive an enemy, such as a snake or leopard, lying in ambush, his rapid retreat with depressed tail would instantly warn the others of the danger. There are many reasons for the tail being the chief organ of expression among dogs. They have but little facial expression beyond the lifting of the lip to show the teeth and the dilation of the pupil of the eye when angry. Among the wild Canidz, all of whom have stiff erect ears, emotion is shown in the head or visage even less than among domestic dogs. The jaws and contiguous parts are too much specialised for the serious business of seizing THE DOG. 53 prey to be fitted for such purposes, as they are in man. With dogs which hunt by scent the head is necessarily carried low, and is therefore not plainly visible except to those close by. But in the case of all hunting dogs, such as fox- hounds, or wolves which pack together, the tail is carried aloft, and is very free in movement. It is also frequently rendered more conspicuous by the tip being white, and this is invariably the case when the hounds are of mixed colour. When ranging the long grass of the prairie or jungle, the raised tips of the tails would often be all that an individual member would see of his fellows. There is no doubt that hounds habitually watch the tails of those in front of them when drawing a cover. If a faint drag is detected suggestive of the presence of a fox, but scarcely sufficient to be sworn to vocally, the tail of the finder is at once set in motion, and the warmer the scent the quicker does it wag. Others seeing the signal instantly join the first, and there is an assemblage of waving tails before ever the least whimper is heard. Should the drag prove a doubtful one the hounds separate again, and the waving ceases; but if it grows stronger when followed 54 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. up, the wagging becomes more and more em- phatic, until one after another the hounds begin to whine and give tongue, and stream off in Indian file along the line of scent. When the pack is at full cry upon a strong scent the ‘‘sterns” cease to wave, but are carried aloft in full view. The whole question of tail-wagging is a very interesting one. All dogs wag their tails when pleased, and the movement is generally under- stood by their human associates as an intimation that they are happy. But when we attempt to discover the reason why pleasure should be expressed in this way, the explanation appears at first very difficult to reach. All physical attributes of living beings are, upon the evolu- tionary hypothesis, traceable to some actual need, either past or present. The old and delightfully conclusive dictum that things are as they are because they are made so “in the beginning,” no longer can be put forward to settle knotty problems in natural history. No doubt, in many cases—as, for instance, when we speculate on the primary origin of human laughter—the mystery seems almost unfathom- able. But this present helplessness only results THE DOG. me from our defective knowledge of data upon which to build the bridge of deductive argument. The reason is there all the time could we but reach it ; and almost daily we are able to account for mys- terious and apparently inexplicable phenomena which utterly baffled our predecessors. Probably the manner in which domestic dogs express pleasure is owing to some interlocking of the machinery of cognate ideas. In order to understand this better it may be helpful to con- sider some analogous instances with regard to habits of our own species. One of the most philosophical of modern physicians, Dr Lauder Brunton, has clearly and amusingly shown that the instinctive delight and eagerness with which a medical man traces an obscure disease step by step to its primary cause, and then enters into combat with it, is referable to the hunter’s joy in pursuit, which doubtless characterised our savage ancestors when they patiently tracked their prey to its lair and slew it for glory or for sustenance. Mr Grant Allen, I believe, first suggested that our appreciation of bright and beautiful colours, and therefore of the splendours of the flower- garden or of the sunset tints in the sky, might 56 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. be owing to the frugivorous habits of our very early progenitors, to whom the sight of red or golden ripe fruit was naturally one of acute pleasure. Another apposite illustration is the delight we derive from all manner of contests of wits and muscles, so that nearly all our games, from whist to football, partake of the nature of strife for the mastery. A game is, of course, a systematic and recognised method of obtaining pleasure, and if we take a survey of all the most popular forms of recreation of this kind, we shall find that none of them are free from the elements of that struggle for supremacy which has been a chief factor in the evolution of the human race, especially throughout the ages of barbarism. Now, if arboreal man took delight in discover- ing and devouring luscious and gorgeous fruits, and savage man in hunting for prey and in fighting his rivals or the foes of his tribe—and all these ancient habits leave an impress upon our modern ways of seeking and showing pleasure— we can see that the dog’s manner of manifesting pleasurable emotions may be traceable to certain necessary accompaniments of remote wild habits of self-maintenance. THE DOG, 67 As with man, so with the dog; civilisation has made existence much more complex. The sources of pleasure of the savage man are few compared with those of the cultured and civilised, yet we find that the means of expres- sion which we possess are but elaborations of those existing long before civilisation began. We must, therefore, look at the dog’s past history and find out what were his most acute pleasures, and what the gestures accompanying them, when he was a pure and simple wild beast, if we wish to elucidate his manner of expressing pleasure now. There can be no doubt that the chief delight of wild dogs, as with modern hounds and sport- ing dogs, is in the chase and its accompanying excitement and consequences. One of the most thrilling moments to the human hunter (and doubtless to the canine), and one big with that most poignant of all delights, anticipation of pleasurable excitement combined with muscular activity, is when the presence of game is first detected. As we have seen in watching the behaviour in a pack of foxhounds, this is in- variably the time when tails are waved for the common good. ‘Tail-wagging is an inevitable 58 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. concomitant of one form of pleasure, which, apparently, is chiefest among the agreeable emotions when dogs are in the wild state. Owing to some inosculation of the nervous mechanism, which at present we cannot un- ravel, the association of pleasure and wagging has become so inseparable that the movement of the tail now accompanies the emotion what- ever may call it forth. An explanation of a similar kind can be found for the fact that dogs depress their tails when threatened or scolded. When running away the tail would be the part nearest the pursuer, and therefore most likely to be seized. It was there- fore securely tucked away between the hind-legs. The act of running away is naturally closely associated with the emotion of fear, and there- fore this gesture of putting the tail between the legs becomes an invariable concomitant of retreat or submission in the presence of superior force. When a puppy taken out for an airing curves its tail downwards and scuds in circles and half- circles at fullest speed around its master, it is apparently trying to provoke its pseudo-cynic playfellow to pursue it in mock combat. It may be observed in passing that this running in THE DOG. 59 sharp curves, with frequent change of direction, is a common ruse with animals which are pur- sued by larger enemies. The reason of it is that the centrifugal impulse acts more powerfully on the animal of larger bulk, and so gives the smaller an advantage. Several years ago there was a good deal of dis- cussion of the distinctive peculiarity of the pointer and setter in the ‘Field’ and other papers. It was suggested that the habit of standing still as soon as game was scented, instead of springing forward at once to seize it, was an instance of the manner in which a natural instinct might be ab- solutely reversed by training. One of the ex- planations attempted at the time for this apparent anomaly was, that the immovable position of the dog was comparable to the pause which most beasts of prey make before a final spring. But we must recollect, when considering this theory, that few of the Canide pounce from an ambush suddenly upon their prey after the manner of cats. And although a terrier will stand immov- able before a rat-hole for hours together, his patient, watchful attitude is very different from the rigid and strained position of the pointer or setter ; which position also has nothing in it sug- 60 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. gestive of crouching preparatory to a rapid bound forwards, as is seen when a cat stalks a bird, and then gathers herself together before the final coup. Not unfrequently the tail of a young setter when it sets game may be seen trembling and vibrating as if it had a disposition to wag, which was kept in check by the supreme importance of not disturbing the hare or covey. The tail also is held out in full view like a flag, whereas a rat- catcher’s dog on the watch at a hole often droops its tail. I think that there can be no doubt that the pointer and setter, in acting in their characteristic manner, are following an old instinct connected with an important piece of co-operative pack strategy, although the peculiarity has been en- hanced by human training and selection, and the sportsmen with their guns have supplanted, and therefore act the part of, the dog’s natural com- rades in the chase. The writer during his boyhood had charge of a small pack of beagles at a South Down home- stead, several of which were allowed to run loose at night as a guard against the foxes. Amongst these was an old dog, a part-bred Skye terrier, very sagacious, and well known in all the country THE DOG. 61 round as a sure finder when the pack were used to drive rabbits in the gorse. Old Rattler (what a throng of memories the name calls up!) was the recognised leader of the others, and not unfrequently he would conduct them on a private hunting expedition, in which he served as sole huntsman and whip. Often on a still night his sharp yapping bark, accompanied by the clearer long-drawn music of the beagles, might be heard among the hills, as they drove a predatory fox from the farm-buildings, or strove to run down one of the tough South Down hares. It soon became evident that this pack had a certain regular system of co-operation, and, like the African wild dogs, well described by Dr S. T. Pruen in his recent book, ‘The Arab and the African, they made a practice of playing into one another’s hands, or rather mouths. Old Rattler would generally trot on ahead, surveying every likely tuft of grass or ling, and exhibiting that inquisitiveness and passion for original research which is so characteristic of the terrier. On arriv- ing at a small outlying patch of furze he would invariably proceed to the leeward side, so that as the wind drew through the covert it would con- vey a hint of whatever might be there concealed. 62 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. He would give critical sniffs, with head raised and lowered alternately, and then would either trot indifferently away or else stand rigid with quickly vibrating tail and nose pointing towards the bush. The other dogs seemed to understand instantly what was required of them, and they would quickly surround the covert. When they were in their places, and not until then, the cun- ning old schemer would plunge with a bound into the furze, and out would dash a hare or rabbit, often into the very jaws of one of the beagles. By this artifice, which had never been taught them by man, the pack when hunting for them- selves would doubtless often secure a meal, pre- ceded by the delight of killing without the weari- some process of tiring out a hare. Now it appears to me that this habit of the leader of the pack—a habit which, from its similarity to what has been observed in the case of such widely separated Canidze as the dingo, wolf, and hyena-dog, is one that is trace- able to very remote wild ancestors—is the basis of that peculiar talent in the pointer or setter which adds to the piquancy of a day’s shooting and to the weight of the bag. THE DOG. 63 Let us endeavour to look at the part played by a pointer in the light of cynomorphic theory. “Ponto” goes out with his pack (often a very scratch one), his comrades walking on two legs instead of four like ordinary dogs, and carrying their tails, or organs of a somewhat similar aspect, over their shoulders. The pack separate and advance in line, he being appointed to explore in the van and to search the turnips or rape for a tell-tale whiff of the scent of game. The covey is detected, but, being a co-operative and a loyal dog, he does not rush in and try to catch for himself. He therefore stands and waits for his partners to perform their share of the stratagem. All that he has to do is to show them in an unmistakable manner that there is quarry worth having in front of his nose. The pack advance, he generally taking careful note of their approach, the covey rises, the “tails” of the bipedal dogs explode, and Ponto is rewarded by holding in his mouth a palpitating mass of feathers, with perhaps the stimulating flavour of blood, and by a public intimation that the community or pack approve of his conduct and esteem him, what he dearly loves to be thought, “a good ) dog.’ 64 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. When we come to consider the very long period during which dogs have been domesti- cated and under the influence of deliberate selec- tion, it is surprising to find how much in their behaviour they resemble their wild brethren. The rule seems to hold good here as elsewhere, that the outward form is much more plastic to the influence of environment than the character and mental habits which are dependent upon the nervous system. Thus, although the deerhound and the pug are so different in external appearance that it is difficult to believe that they are related, yet if we watch them we find that their mental and moral qualities are of a similar cast. The fine grey wolf in the Zoological Gardens, Re- gent’s Park, and the performing wolves recently exhibited in London, when in a good humour, had precisely the same methods of express- ing pleasure as domestic dogs, and would wag their tails and gambol about in a manner which made one doubt for the moment whether they were not in reality Scotch collies masquerading as wild beasts. There are many other traits in our domestic dogs suggestive of their ancestral habits which cannot be dealt with on this occasion, but which THE DOG. 65 offer a most interesting field for study to every one who possesses a dog, and a taste for re- search in this direction. In concluding g, it may be well to notice briefly the chief points of dissimilarity between the wild and tame Canidez. In the first place, there is a general difference of aspect and bearing which it is difficult to describe exactly. The wild animal has an alert independent look which the tame one has lost, chiefly owing to its long-continued habit of dependence upon man. Although, of course, all breeds of tame dogs have been at some time or other deliberately adapted by training and selection for special purposes, yet there seem to be certain characteristics which have risen spon- taneously, or because the parts in which they are manifest are correlated with some others where an intentional change has been brought about. Darwin gives an instance of this in the hairless dogs, which at the same time are deficient in teeth. This question of correlation is one of the most interesting and obscure problems of natural history, and perhaps we are at present a little too ready (with our hereditary tendency to take refuge in an imposing mystery whenever our reasoning powers fail us) to ascribe to it E 66 . WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. certain phenomena, the explanation of which, by the ordinary laws of evolution, is not clear. Most probably the drooping ears of our domes- ticated hounds and hunting dogs primarily arose from the fact that the savage huntsman, disre- garding shape, picked those dogs to breed from which manifested the keenest powers of scent, and that in these individuals the ears were not so much in use as in others. Again, in every litter of whelps the surly, independent, and ill- tempered brute would always be more likely to be eliminated than those which were confiding and tractable; and so, from age to age, the chief outward traits which distinguish the dog from wolves and jackals would tend to increase. Finally, the instinct of association has, in the case of the domestic dog, become more exactly fitted to the new conditions of environment. He makes himself thoroughly at home with us because he feels that he is with his own proper pack, and not among strangers or those of an alien race. The wild animal, on the contrary, which refuses to become domesticated, still has the perception that those who would palm them- selves off as his comrades are creatures of an THE DOG. ” 67 alien nature. He sturdily refuses to become a party to the fraud, and remains suspicious of their intentions; and, whatever they may do to propitiate him, he keeps on the gzz vzve as against a possible enemy. 68 CEA P TER. We THE HORSE. Tue horse has been the servant of man for such a long time that we are liable to forget that he once had an independent existence and managed his own affairs without our help; yet, if we ex- amine the qualities which bring him into associa- tion with us, we shall find that man has had but little to do with their development, and nothing whatever to do with their origin. For instance, we value the horse chiefly for his speed and endurance, yet had it not been for the chief ancestor of our faithful friend the dog, the grim grey wolf of Europe and Asia with his perpetual hunger and untiring gallop, the wild horses which, in ancient times, swarmed over nearly all the great plains of the world, and from which all our modern steeds have sprung, would never ‘SSHATOM AM GANSUNd SASMOH CTIA THE HORSE. 69 have developed the swiftness and staying power which they undoubtedly possessed before they became captives, and which they have trans- mitted to their descendants. The wolves and the wild horses were con- stantly at war; and, moreover, the wolf was the only predatory beast existing in ancient times which was able to pursue the horses and hunt them down on the open steppe. The speed and staying power of the horse were undoubtedly developed in the first place to enable him to escape from these gaunt persistent foes. Un- intentionally the wolves acted as agents for im- proving the quality of the stock. The swift and. the strong escaped them; the sluggish and the weak were devoured: and hence the special attributes which we value in a horse were enhanced from generation to generation. So certain does this appear to me, that I never see a wolf in a menagerie without feeling inclined to thank him for many an exhilarating gallop on horseback. If his bloodthirsty forefathers had never existed there would have been little to choose between the pace of a horse and that of a donkey. It must be borne in mind that such influences 79 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. were at work from day to day and from year to year during immense epochs before ever the first wild horse was lassoed by prehistoric savages. Strange to say, this long and bitter feud between the Equide and the Canide seems now almost entirely forgotten. Horses seldom show an in- stinctive dislike to dogs; and in this respect their conduct presents a marked contrast to that of domestic cattle, which never seem able to forget the enmity of ancient days. Probably the truce which has been established between horses and dogs is chiefly owing to their close associa- tion in their common state of servitude to man. The horse is an intelligent animal, quickly adapting himself to new circumstances; and, moreover, he readily finds out who are his friends. Probably also when wild he had little to fear from a single wolf; for he has plenty of courage as well as speed, and is a skilful fighter with hoofs and teeth. Occasionally, however, the old dread and enmity crop up. I have known young horses, when surrounded by a pack of foxhounds for the first time, to become almost frantic with fear. A gentleman who lives among the Sussex Downs, and who spends much of his time on horseback, has informed me that THE HORSE. wa he has often noticed when crossing the open hills at night that his mare would suddenly start and tremble and try to make a dash for home with ears laid back and every sign of great agitation. At first he was puzzled by this, for the animal was generally quiet and tractable. At length he found that the terrifying object was usually a wandering hill-fox, which had chanced to pass near enough to be perceived either by the horse’s eyes or nostrils. Foxes, of course, are not dangerous to larger animals, but probably there is something in the ¢, which wild beast about them, absent in the dog, reminds the horses of their ancient foes. There is no doubt that, when coyotes are ridden down on the prairie and killed with a bull-whip or revolver at close quarters, the horses enter into the hunt with enthusiasm. They do their best to catch the wolves, and will strike at them with their hoofs if they get near enough. Darwin has recorded the remarkable fact that almost the only occasion upon which horses are known to scream with terror, when not suffering pain, is when they are attacked by wolves. Charles Kingsley, in one of his charming prose idylls, very graphically describes the conduct of his horse when a hunted 72 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. fox passed near. It laid back its ears, bared its teeth, and bit at the air in the direction of the fox. Kingsley accounted for the hostile demon- stration on the part of his horse by the fact that it was an old hunter. Excellent naturalist though he was, I think he was wrong in his conclusion. A horse ridden after hounds seldom has a chance of seeing the object of pursuit, and probably in nine cases out of ten knows nothing about it. Certainly he could never learn enough to acquire a savage hostility to poor Reynard. Nor is there any reason why he should. The hunted fox, whether known or unknown, is to him a source of delight ; for a hunter always manifests pleasure- able excitement when he sees the hounds and anticipates a gallop. I have often observed that young foals show - some instinctive fear of dogs, and that they are very careful to keep on the opposite side of their dams when a dog comes into the paddock. Doubtless this is due to an inherent protective habit which was very valuable in the wild state. In looking for remnants of wild traits in domestic animals, we are far more likely to be successful if we study young creatures which have not had their innate primeval instincts adulterated with THE HORSE. 73 impressions gathered from a civilised environ- ment than if we confine our attention to adults. It will be found that all truly innate instincts, without exception, are of enormous antiquity, and that they date back to an era long antecedent to the time when man began to tame and make use of any of the lower animals. We know that the horse’s wild forefathers, like the free mustangs and wild steeds of the Asian steppes, inhabited open plains and trusted chiefly to their speed in escaping from their enemies. This at once be- comes evident when we examine a young foal, which in outward shape as well as in mental attributes tends to resemble the earlier types from which the modern representatives of the race have sprung. The legs of a colt are enor- mously developed from birth. He looks absurdly like a horse on stilts, and when four or five days old he can gallop almost as fast as ever he will in his life. He holds his head up boldly, and never tries to slink away and hide like a young calf or fawn, whose ancestors dwelt in the forest. There is a story that a thoroughbred foal of about a month old once beat a trained race-horse over a half-mile course, and thereby won his owner a hand- some sum which had been wagered against him. 74 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. His dam was a mare celebrated for her speed, and she had a jockey on her back. She outstripped the rival horse, and her long-legged offspring kept level with her with ease. If you watch how a young colt takes his nour- ishment, you will see that his habit tells the same story. He never takes a full meal like that glut- tonous suckling the calf, which will distend its stomach with a gallon of milk at a time, but keeps constantly running to his dam, and refreshing himself with a few mouthfuls. This shows, firstly, that it is not his custom to be long absent from his dam, as are young animals which lie hidden among the thickets while their'parents go to seek pasture ; and, secondly, that his stomach is never so loaded with food as to hinder his running powers, which were all-important when the youngest member of the band had to keep up with the rest in their flight from wolves or other enemies. Again, a colt, when he lies down, does not curl himself up in small compass as if to escape observation after the bashful manner of a calf, but extends his long limbs conspicuously. Another sure sign that the early horses lived on open plains is seen in the manner in which their modern descendants bear themselves when THE HORSE. 75 alarmed or excited. A horse will always hold its head high; whereas a cow, if startled or sus- picious, usually keeps its head rather below the level of the spine, even when it has no intention of using its horns. The reason of this difference is, that the wild horse is in the habit of watching the horizon for danger, and therefore—like the look-out man at sea—finds elevation an advan- tage; whereas the cow, whose ancestors were forest animals, instinctively holds her head so as to see under the interlacing boughs. Obviously also a dweller in the woods is able to make better progress when its head is kept low than when it is raised. It would be quite easy, if some new animal were brought to this country for the first time, to decide whether its natural habitat was in the forest or on open plains by observing the manner in which it habitually carried its head. The chamois, the prong-horn antelope of America, the gazelle, the guanacoes of the uplands of Pata- gonia, as well as the wild horses and the wild asses, habitually hold the head high; whereas the forest deer, antelopes that dwell in the bush, buffaloes, and all wild cattle, adopt a converse attitude, as if to obtain a clearer view among the tree-stems. 76 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. When we consider how exceedingly different are the present surroundings of the horse from those to which it was at first adapted by nature, it is rather difficult to understand how his legs stand the perpetual wear and tear of work in our great cities, where every step is upon a hard un- yielding pavement. There is no other creature living, with the exception of the donkey or the mule, whose legs and feet could long bear the constant battering and shaking entailed by rapid locomotion over paved roads. Of course no hoofs would stand the continual abrasion caused by a granite or flinty surface unless they were pro- tected by shoes. The horny matter of which the hoofs consist is extremely tough and grows very rapidly ; but its rate of growth was calculated, in the first place, to the needs of the wild horse, which spent most of its time on sandy or grassy plains, where the hoofs would not wear away any- thing like so quickly as on a rasping macadamised roadway. Nature never reckoned on the ruinous expenditure in hoof material involved in modern road traffic, and, as a matter of fact, the feet of an unshod horse are soon reduced to a state of bank- ruptcy if in constant contact with a stony surface. Man has got over this difficulty by fastening, THE HORSE. 77 iron shoes to the tough horny layer which forms the outside of the hoof. The need which existed in ancient times for power to traverse rough and stony ground has ensured sufficient toughness and substance in the hoof material to allow the smith to nail the shoes securely. But in getting over this difficulty the horse’s master has rather in- creased than diminished the shock of contact with the hard ground, and if the ignorant farrier should cut away the elastic triangular cushion called the “frog” beneath the horse’s foot (which was nature’s original provision for breaking such shocks), the bones and sinews of the horse’s legs soon reveal the injury caused by constant jars. Among civilised surroundings (which, as far as the horse is concerned, means interminable hard roads) the indiarubber-like “frog” if left alone would help to protect the legs from the effects of vibration. But if we look at the structure of the limbs just above the hoofs, we see another important reason why paved surfaces and such- like unfavourable conditions do not injure the legs more. The fetlock or pastern-joints of a well-bred horse are long and elastic, so that they yield a little at each step and so break the force of the concussion. The animal is, in fact, 78 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. mounted on springs. This is one reason why a thoroughbred is a pleasant animal to ride. Any one who has tried riding a cow or an ox has found the difference between the stubby jogging gait of these animals and the free elastic movement of the horse. We find that amongst the horses of Arab and Barb descent the pastern-joints are longer and more springy than among the breeds in- digenous to Eastern Europe. This is what might be expected; for the desert horse has frequently to traverse hard rocky ground, and moreover has been used during many genera- tions for rapid travelling, whereas the progeny of the native European horses (such, for instance, as the common cart-horse and the Welsh pony) have been used to grass-covered surfaces from time immemorial, and have generally been em- ployed in slow work on the land since they were impressed into human service. The importance of these natural means of avoiding undue vibration to a highly organised creature like the horse can be judged by those who have ridden both a modern improved bicycle and an old-fashioned “bone - shaker.” Continual jarring is always most exhausting and THE HORSE. 79 injurious to the animal frame. The reason why a pneumatic-tired sulky is worth several seconds in the mile to an American trotter is not so much because it is of light draught, as because practically no vibration is conveyed along the shafts and traces to the horse’s body. Ever so little vibration will weary his muscles and hamper his movements to a certain extent. A-further proof that the horse’s ancestors lived on open plains where vegetation was sparse is found in the arrangement of his teeth and in his method of grazing. Unlike the cow, the horse has chisel-like incisor teeth in both jaws. This enables him to bite very closely; in fact, a horse will thrive in a field where cattle are starving. If you watch a cow grazing you will find that she puts out her tongue and gathers the grass into a bunch, which she nips off by means of her sharp lower teeth pressing against the elastic pad in the upper jaw. The very fact that she always makes this gathering movement with her tongue when feeding shows she takes the length of the grass for granted, because she in- variably acts as if there were sufficient herbage for the tongue to get together into a bunch before making an effort to bite or nip it off. Not so the 80 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. horse: he habitually behaves as if there was only a short growth of grass, or as if it were necessary to bite as near the roots as possible. In the former case the method of grazing is adapted for a life among trees and sheltered meadows, where the grass is lank and lush from abundant moisture. In the latter the method is exactly suited for the parched and wiry herbage which grows out in the open and is exposed to drought, sun, and wind, and where only that part of each stalk or blade which is close to the ground has any great nutritive value. I should like to discuss the question why the horse in the wild state took to a life out in the open, and what are the other effects of such a life upon his structure and habits, rather more in detail; but this would involve too many technical points in equine anatomy and physiology for present purposes. His earliest known fossil ancestor was a splay- footed five-toed animal about the size of a collie-dog. It was by no means swift or imposing in appearance, and pro- bably paddled about in the soft marshes which prevailed over a great part of the earth’s surface during the early part of the Tertiary geological THE HORSE. 81 epoch, much as the tapir wades and paddles in the South American swamps at the present day. During later periods there were huge herds of three-toed horses abounding all the world over, but, as time went on, certain evolutionary forces caused the two outer toes to disappear. At present, with the exception of a few curious reverting “freaks” occasionally exhibited in museums, all horses walk on the limb which corresponds anatomically to the human middle finger. The “ring” and “index” digits which did duty as locomotive auxiliaries in the three- toed horses have been found useless and have been suppressed, although they occasionally make themselves remembered in an unpleasant manner even in the present day when they give rise to ‘‘splints” in young horses which have been over- worked. One rule of equine evolution seems to have been, “the fewer the toes, the better the horse.” It is quite certain that a single-hoofed extremity is better adapted for habitual swift locomotion over hard ground than one of the splay-footed type like those of the horse's re- latives, the tapir and the rhinoceros. At present it is by no means easy to state how the structural changes in the equine foot came F 82 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. about. Did the earth gradually dry up so as to give the one-toed varieties, which preferred a firm foothold, the advantage? Or had the sedgy marshes and thicket - lined streams too many bloodthirsty inhabitants with a taste for horse - flesh, so that the early equine creatures were driven to take refuge in the open? I am inclined to think that the latter guess is the correct one. Even now most young horses resemble wild animals in being extremely sus- picious of any strange sound or object, especially if they are among bushes or high grass so that they cannot obtain a clear view of their sur- roundings. ‘“Shying” is most distinctly a relic of a valuable ancestral instinct. The wild horse, swift of foot and clear of vision, feared few enemies when out on the naked plains; but every bush or tuft of long grass might, and often did, contain a fierce foe lying in ambush. Many and many a time must the wild horse have saved his life by a sudden swerve and leap in the opposite direction the moment he heard the rustle of leaves or descried some strange and dimly outlined object among the underwood. I know several horses which are not timid or THE HORSE. 83 given to shying as a general rule, but which be- , come almost mad with terror when they hear the loud rustle of reeds by a river-bank. Yet there is no danger whatever to be anticipated from this sound as far as their own experience goes. Such seizures of panic in the modern horse tell us a tale of many a tragic incident in the remote past, when the herds of wild desert steeds, parched with thirst, sought the watercourses where was “‘orass with reeds and rushes,” and were there pounced upon by leopards or tigers, crouching in ambush on the watch for prey. No doubt the so-called vice of ‘“ bucking” was at one time a saving virtue as far as the horse was concerned, for by this means he would often be able to shake off an enemy which had pounced upon him. The habit is rather a curious one, and seemed to be partly due to imitation; for one finds that horses in certain localities are specially addicted to it, although they do not seem to belong to any one special breed. For instance, the horses in some parts of Australia and the mustangs of Northern Mexico are noto- rious buck - jumpers; whereas their relatives in other parts are not nearly so given to the habit. It is worth while noting, however, that both the 84 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. Australian and the Mexican horses live a life much more like that of their free ancestors than do those in more settled countries, and hence they would be likely to redevelop attributes which are specially appropriate to the wild state. It seems pretty clear, from the wide distribution of the habit, that it is instinctive; and therefore in searching for its origin we must look for cir- cumstances in which it was of use in the horse’s daily life. However effective bucking may be in getting rid of a human burden, it can hardly be said that such a result is of sufficient benefit to the equine race to have established the habit in the first place. In fact, it is pretty obvious that the effect would be exactly the reverse of beneficial. For if the custom became so common that every would-be horseman found that he was always maltreated and thrown as soon as he got into the saddle, equestrianism would soon go out of fashion, and thus a large and prosperous sec- tion of the equine community would cease to exist. One reason for assigning the origin of bucking to a period long antecedent to the first experiments in horsemanship is its undoubtedly instinctive character. It has been remarked above that all inherent instincts are of an almost boundless THE HORSE. Ss antiquity: indeed I doubt if a single instance could be brought forward where a truly congenital instinct in one of our domestic animals can be traced, either directly or indirectly, to human influence. A further indication of the natural basis of the habit of buck-jumping is the fact that young colts of all breeds go through the per- formance when at play; and almost any nag, when first turned loose at pasture, will lower his head and hump his back and give two or three vigorous hoists by way of showing that he is happy. Now, natural play is without exception of educative value. Nature had adopted this method of ‘teaching the young idea” skill in the use of its limbs and weapons both for purposes of war with our own kind and for purposes of defence against carnivorous foes. When, there- fore, one sees any habitual action indulged in by young animals at play, it is safe to say that it is instinctive and extremely ancient, and, moreover, that it was at one time necessary as a preparation for the serious business of wild life. Any one who has seen an accomplished buck-jumper rid himself of his rider and his saddle, in spite of girths and crupper, will be convinced that a leopard, or any beast of a similar kind, would 86 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. have considerable difficulty in retaining his hold on the back of such an animal. And, moreover, when the head of the intended victim was down between his knees, a panther could scarcely accomplish his favourite method of killing by seizing the nose with one paw and twisting the head back so as to dislocate the neck. Every horse which is employed on the road must learn to trot or he is of little use to his owner, yet we find that the wild prairie horses and young colts out at pasture seldom trot ex- cept for a few steps when changing from a canter toa walk. Some naturalists have even said that this pace is entirely artificial, and has been ac- quired since the horse became man’s captive. I need not say anything of the wonderful per- fection to which trotting has been brought by judicious breeding and training. But let us con- sider what was the natural raw material out of which the feats of ‘‘ Maud S.” and her competi- tors have been evolved. On the smooth, springy turf cantering or gal- loping is the easiest pace; but on a hard, ir- regular track, with rocks strewn about, even the wild horse will trot, and lift his knees in the most approved style. So at least I have been told by THE HORSE. 87 those who have watched the wild “ brumbies” in the mountains of Australia. The reason is not difficult to see. A horse when he walks or trots puts down one front foot at a time; and when the rough and treacherous nature of the ground renders great care necessary (for a false step might mean instant death from foes or precipices), this is by far the safest method of going for an animal of his weight and bulk. He can choose his foothold better when walking or trotting than if, as when he canters or gallops, he has to find resting-places for both his front hoofs together instead of for one ata time. We find practically nowadays that for road-work trotting is the safest pace, and takes far less out of a horse than cantering. Here again we see that a provision of nature for certain special emergencies of free equine life has been taken hold of by civilised man and developed for his own ends. When we come to discuss the useful attri- butes of the ox it will be shown that his value as a draught animal is directly dependent on certain peculiar habits of his wild life. This can hardly be said of the cart-horse. It is merely through a happy coincidence that we are able, without much difficulty, so to harness him as to 88 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. avail ourselves of his great muscular power for the purpose of pulling loads. The only wild trait upon which his value as a draught animal can be said to be based is the propulsive power in the thighs and loin of the wild steed which enables him to jump obstacles and to gallop up steep slopes when he is escaping from pursuing foes. Precisely the same set of muscles as are useful for such purposes are brought into action when the dray-horse bends himself to his work to haul a heavy load up-hill. The front legs of a horse act somewhat at a disadvantage when used for hauling, but still one can see that when the wild ancestor of the cart-horse was climbing some precipitous path he must have exercised the muscles of the ‘‘arm” in a manner similar to that of the draught-horse when doing his best to move a heavy load. Perhaps the most happy coin- cidence of all is the fact that one can fix a collar on the neck of most horses in such a way as to enable them to use all their most powerful muscles in pulling without the pressure causing any im- pediment or injury. Most young people who have attempted to draw some heavy load when “playing at horses” know how exceedingly diffi- cult it is to arrange the band attached to the THE HORSE. 89 traces in such a manner as neither to cause painful pressure nor to interfere with the free action of the lungs. I do not know any natural reason why the region of the shoulder and neck in the horse should have the structures so ar- ranged as to offer facility for the wearing of a collar. In this case chance has come to the aid of man’s ingenuity, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that man’s ingenuity has seized upon a fortunate chance. One point as to the special fitness of a draught-horse’s shape for his work is probably due to an original peculiarity of the heavier breeds which existed in the days of equine freedom. For slow draught an upright shoulder with a rather heavy “ point” is considered most desirable, whereas a sloping shoulder, which does not project forwards, is found best adapted for the duties of the saddle- horse and for light-harness work requiring speed rather than strength. The aboriginal horses of Western Europe, from which our heavier modern breeds are probably descended, were built on the former plan, whereas the modern representatives of the more speedy Eastern and Southern steeds have light sloping shoulders, which, while unfitting them for heavy-harness 90 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. work, prove just what is wanted in a hunter or a race-horse. We owe the tractable and docile temper of the horse to the fact that he is naturally gregarious in his habits; for when many animals are associ- ated together for common protection an accom- modating temper and a readiness to obey the leaders are most necessary virtues. Selfishness and cantankerousness would soon break up the band, and then each member would have to fight the wolves or watch for the prowling Felide single- handed. A two-year-old colt readily yields his will to that of his trainer, because the young wild horse always had to “knock under” to the wild veteran which was the acknowledged leader of the mob. Further proofs of the social habits of the horse are found in his readiness to respond when spoken to, and in his numerous methods of communicating with his fellows. Not only does he neigh, but he makes use of various less pronounced sounds, such as subdued whinnies and snorts, by means of which he makes known his wants or sentiments. A horse can readily tell from the sound made by a fellow whether he is alarmed or angry. Not long ago I was THE HORSE. QI driving a pony near London when, some distance ahead, I saw a bolting horse which had got away from its driver and was approaching at a furious gallop. The pony did not see the terrified run- away, which, fortunately, was stopped before it reached me. As I drove past the spot where some men were holding the animal, the pony, which all the time had gained no knowledge of what was going on, heard the snorting of the frightened horse and at once became so terrified as to be almost uncontrollable. The sound was to him evidently a warning signal of the most urgent kind, and for the rest of the morning he kept his head up (although not naturally a shy animal), as if on the look-out for some dangerous object. There is no surer way of judging whether an animal is naturally and habitually accustomed to associate with its fellows and to act in concert with them than by observ- ing its readiness in expressing emotion. One remarkable and most valuable trait in the horse is its courage. This was doubtless attributable in the first place to the habit of the wild stallion of waging fierce war with rivals or enemies. Although valour of the combative kind is not often called for in the domestic 92 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. horse—unless he is used for military purposes— and therefore has not been specially cultivated by breeders, it is probable that the natural courage of horses has been rather increased than diminished by civilisation. This is due to the selection of successful race-horses for breed- ing purposes. Now a horse-race is quite as much a test of pluck as of muscular power; in fact it is usually more so, for the animal which will keep up its pace as long as it has breath, will generally prevail over a better equipped rival which flags as soon as it feels severe fatigue. Owing to this fact, and the long-continued choice of winners for stud purposes, it is now an almost universal rule that ‘‘blood”-horses are highly courageous. They are certainly not so much given to shying as are “half-bred” horses—al- though this may possibly be due in part to another cause. Modern race-horses have an al- most pure and unbroken descent from the desert- dwelling steeds of the East, whereas our heavier horses are probably derived to a great extent from the wild mobs which in prehistoric times inhabited the moister regions of Central and Western Europe. Now, if our interpretation of the origin of the habit of shying be correct, it THE HORSE. 93 is evident that the horse dwelling among com- paratively thickly wooded regions in Europe must have had to employ this method of escaping from ambushed foes much more frequently than did the wild Eastern steeds who made their home on the bare and open steppe. Every one has noticed that a horse lays back his ears when he is ina bad temper. Darwin, in his work on ‘The Expression of the Emotions,’ says :— When horses fight together they use their incisors for biting, and their fore-legs for striking, much more than they do their hind-legs for kicking backwards. This has been observed when stallions have broken loose and have fought together, and may likewise be inferred from the kind of wounds which they inflict on each other. Every one recognises the vicious ap- pearance which the drawing back of the ears gives a horse. This movement is very different from that of listening to a sound behind. If an ill-tempered horse in a stall is inclined to kick backwards, his ears are retracted from habit, though he has no intention or power to bite. But when a horse throws up both hind-legs in play, as when entering an open field, or when just touched by the whip, he does not generally depress his ears, for he does not feel vicious. Guana- coes fight savagely with their teeth; and they must do so frequently, for I found the hides of several 94 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. which I shot in Patagonia deeply scored. So do camels; and both these animals when savage draw their ears closely backwards. Guanacoes, as I have noticed, when not intending to bite but merely to spit their offensive saliva from a distance on an in- truder, retract their ears. Even the hippopotamus, when threatening with its widely-open enormous mouth a comrade, draws back its small ears just like a horse. Now what a contrast is presented between the fore- going animals and cattle, sheep, or goats, which never use their teeth in fighting, and never draw back their ears when enraged.} The great difference between the various breeds of horses has been largely brought about by human agency, but not entirely so. We find that in mountainous regions the native horses are always small and stout, with coats inclined to be shaggy. All modern ponies are descended from those herds which chose the hills for their habitat. I shall have something to say in later chapters about the effect of mountain -ranges in developing certain useful qualities of our domestic animals. Not long ago I saw some Hungarian mountain-ponies in London, and mistook them for large Shetlanders. The likeness is certainly very great, and strongly 1 “Expression of the Emotions,’ p. 118. THE HORSE, 95 suggests a common source of origin. Most in- teresting, therefore, is the fact that both kinds bear a remarkable resemblance, as far as general shape is concerned, to the prehistoric European wild horse, which the early men of Central France used to kill with their flint - headed arrows. We know this partly from the shape of the bones of horses found associated with early human remains; but chiefly because of the curious fact that these primitive savages were accomplished artists, and have left many masterly sketches of horses and other animals scratched on reindeer horns, mammoth tusks, and pieces of slate and stone in the caves which they used to inhabit. The horses here represented have large heads, straight short necks, round bodies, and stout legs. We know that they existed in countless herds, for at one place where the ancient horse-hunters lived there are the bones of many thousands, They were sturdy animals, although of no great size; and there is very little doubt that we have, in the Shetland and Hungarian ponies, some of their direct descen- dants. Most of our lighter horses owe their origin largely to Arab and Barb importations. Modern cart-horses are most probably of the 96 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. stout European aboriginal stock, but have been much improved by constant selection and good feeding. Many of them have the appearance of overgrown ponies, and their general shape is similar to that of the native European breeds which have been kept fairly pure by isolation. The mustangs of the West are now pretty thoroughly mixed; but in the first place they were the descendants of the horses which escaped from the Spanish conquerors. These, from ancient pictures, I should judge to have been a cross between the native European horse and the African barb. One is often able to get interesting hints about the habits of animals both in the present and in the past by examining their colour: thus we shall see, when we come to discuss the domestic cat, that the markings familiar to us in the common ‘‘tabby”” reveal a very curious phase in the ancient history of the animal. Certain horses, especially the breeds common in Norway and North-East Europe, have a dark stripe down the spine, and occasionally a few cross markings upon the upper part of the fore-legs. This seems to indicate that at one time the horse was a striped animal, especially as there seems a THE HORSE. 97 tendency among all breeds for similar markings to make their appearance. If so, such stripes would doubtless be of protective value in the same way as are the bands upon the zebra. In a succeeding chapter we shall see how re- markably useful these may prove in saving zebras from their enemies both by day and by night. There seems a curious tendency among the wild and half-wild horses of the Western world to develop conspicuous and_ eccentric colours. A remarkably large proportion of the Indian ponies are “‘piebald,” insomuch that one ingenious correspondent suggested that in the early days of Spanish rule the animals of a travelling circus may have got loose and _ be- come the ancestors of many of the mustangs! Now it seems at first sight rather remarkable that the wild members of a species should be more conspicuous than the tame ones which do not need to resort to concealment. But, as a matter of fact,—as will be seen when we come to discuss the colour of the zebra,—conspicuousness may be a decided advantage to animals living after the manner of wild horses. It would be interesting if we could ascertain whether the peculiarities of colour observable among the G 98 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. prairie horses of to-day have become more marked in the three centuries that have elapsed since the Spanish conquest. At present the Barb and Andalusian breeds are not more variegated in colour than are the other horses of the Old World; and unless the adventurers who took their steeds West had a special taste for “piebald” and other eccentrically coloured steeds, it seems difficult to explain the present prevailing colours among the mustangs, except upon the supposition that the resumption of wild habits has produced some remarkable changes in this respect. Possibly, however, an explanation of the phe- nomenon may be found in the fact that the early adventurers could only have brought a very few horses with them, and that of these invaluable animals the greatest care would have been taken. Hence the number which escaped and which became the ancestors of the wild mustangs would have been very small, and if one of these chanced to possess any special peculiarity it would be likely to be repeated among all its innumerable descendants. The distinct types observable among the various strains of domestic horses doubtless THE HORSE. 99 depend upon the fact that our modern breeds have been derived from several widely different sources. This seems the more likely, because certain peculiarities of disposition appear to be associated with hair of a special tint: thus a roan horse is usually placid and tractable, a sorrel is generally vicious, and a bright bay or chestnut, which shows some white markings and white in the sclerotic of the eye, is almost in- variably courageous and possesses a hot im- patient temper. I do not see how this double uniformity—both in colour and character—can be explained except upon the supposition that each of these distinct types represents some pure-blooded ancient race which originated such attributes of mind and body in the first in- stance. We know that among mankind certain types remain fixed, in spite of a free mixture of different branches of the human family. And in some cases, as, for instance, in that of the choleric red-haired man of Celtic type found wherever English is spoken, peculiarities of complexion and disposition in the individual are clearly traceable to racial idiosyncrasies. Where animals have been domesticated for many generations, it is difficult to trace the Ico WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. original cause of any peculiarity of colour, but it seems probable that the mottled markings seen on grey and “hammer - marked” horses were at one time protective. Doubtless the abundant growth of hair upon the neck of a horse served some essential pur- pose in wild equine economy; but it is not easy for the modern naturalist to explain its vazson détre. One finds a mane of some kind to be exceedingly common among quadrupeds, and the peculiarity does not depend upon mere kinship, for it is found distributed among very diverse orders. As a rule, it does not amount to more than an upright ridge of hair, such as is found upon the necks of many antelopes and all the horse’s humbler relatives. If we are to accept Prejevalsky’s wild horse as a true representative of the aboriginal stock from which our domestic animals have sprung, it would seem as if the mane has been considerably developed since the time when the horse was made captive; for this animal has but little more hair on its neck than has the kiang or Thibetan wild ass. It is, however, very doubtful whether either this animal or the wild tarpan of the steppes of Tartary has a clean record of independence. It is not at all unlikely THE HORSE. 101 that both Prejevalsky’s horse and the wild camels which inhabit the Zaisan and Dzungarian deserts are feral; that is to say, they are descended from animals which have escaped from captivity. The Western mustangs, although they seem to have undergone some of those reversionary changes not uncommon among domestic animals which have resumed their freedom, show no sign what- ever of any curtailment of the mane. In fact, Catlin and other writers who traversed Western America in the days when there were innumerable thousands of wild steeds living on the prairies, describe them as possessing extraordinarily long and thick manes reaching almost to the ground, which, when the animals were in rapid motion, enveloped the forepart of their bodies in a cloud of flying hair. Of the various suggestions which have been made as to the primary use of the mane, two, I think, deserve attention. Doubt- less such a covering would be useful in shielding the delicate structures of the neck from the weather ; although, seeing that the whole spine of the animal seems equally to need protection, this seems scarcely sufficient justification for the local growth of the hair. More probably the mane of the horse, like that of the lion, was 102 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS. primarily of value as a species of defensive armour. In their savage combats for the pos- session of the mares, stallions will invariably endeavour to seize one another by the neck with their powerful teeth, and I think there can be little doubt that the ‘‘crest,”’ which forms one of the chief sexual differences in horses, was de- veloped in the male to protect his cervical vertebrze from attacks of this kind. Yet, since fighting horses usually bite at the centre of the nape of the neck in their opponents, and the mane extends evenly from the forelock to the wither, it seems somewhat doubtful if its pro- tective value in battle would be sufficient to account for its origin. Many very ancient sculp- tures and drawings of horses found in the East go to show that the early civilised races did not consider a long mane desirable, and there- fore it is pretty certain that breeders of those days took no steps to cultivate it. Nearly all these early representations of horses show the mane to be ‘“hogged,” as if the horseman and charioteer of ancient days found the free growth of the hair to be a disadvantage when he was fighting. Although we cannot satisfactorily ac- count for the mane on evolutionary grounds, it THE HORSE. 103 seems obvious that at some time a free growth of hair on the neck was of essential value to the equine race. Hence it is quite worth while for any naturalist of a horsey turn of mind, and with a talent for investigation, to try to unravel the mystery contained in the “elf-locks” in the mane of every yearling. The horse’s tail presents no such problems as to its value and origin. There can be no doubt that the primary use of the long hairs of the tail was to sweep away noxious insects from the skin. We all know how exceedingly sensitive the horse is to the attacks of flies, and how, when his owner allows him a chance, he keeps swishing the long brush with which nature has provided him over the whole surface of his body. To a great extent this action is involuntary and auto- matic. Every one who has been in the habit of driving will have observed that whenever a whip touches a horse it instantly responds with a spasmodic movement of its tail, even although it may be so hopelessly tired or lazy as to re- quire much severer coercive measures to make it quicken its pace. Now this jerk of the tail in the modern carriage-horse is an interesting piece of vestigial reflex action which bears no reference 104 WILD TRAITS IN TAME ANIMALS, whatever to whips or any other civilised innova- tions, but which probably dates back to the Eocene epoch when the Phenacodus primavus continually lashed his robust caudal member to and fro in defending himself against the voracious Tertiary flies. Every one who has the welfare of the horse at heart will commend modern legislative action making it punishable to shorten the “dock” of a horse’s tail. Although a docked horse may look somewhat. smarter to the civilised eye than one with a tail of natural length, and is certainly. yless liable to the risk of getting its tail over the reins when driven, it is to the interest of the owner as well as to that of the animal that such barbarous mutilations should cease. Every horse gains in health, and therefore in value, by being turned out to pasture, under proper conditions, during the summer months. It is fairly obvious that an animal which is able to protect itself against insect enemies in the easy and effectual way which nature has provided, will get much more benefit from such an annual outing than one which cannot get rid of its swarms of worrying persecutors in spite of incessant stamping of the feet and restless movements of the whole body. Every horse has on its legs wart-like scaly THE HORSE. 105 patches of bare skin called callosities. On the front-legs they are above the knee, and on the hind-legs below the hock. They are of no present use that we can discover ; and, in spite of many guesses, no theory has ever been put forward that will satisfactorily account for their presence. In spite of the fact that no horse is without them, and although they hardly ever give rise to incon- venience, certain old writers on veterinary surgery, oddly enough, describe these callosities as mani- festations of disease under the name of ‘“mal- lenders” or ‘“‘sallenders,” and actually set forth several approved methods for effecting a cure! An equally ludicrous instance of want of observa- tion once came directly under my notice.