3 1924 062 827 930 The Fabric of Civilization A Short Survey of the Cotton Industry in the United States Guaranty Trust Company of New York The Fabric of Civilization A Short Survey of the Cotton Industry in the United States Guaranty Trust Company of New York 140 Broadway FIFTH AVENUE OFFICE MADISON AVENUE OFFICE Fifth Avenue and 43rd Street Madison Avenue and 60th Street LONDON OFFICES LIVERPOOL OFFICE 32 Lombard Street, E. C. 27 Cotton Exchange Buildings 5 Lower Grosvenor Pl., S. W. PARIS OFFICE HAVRE OFFICE BRUSSELS OFFICE 1 and 3 Rue des Italiens 122 Boulevard Strasbourg 158 Rue Royale = HDIETS” C97 COPYRIGHT, 1919 GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK HE cotton industry touches the lives of the vast majority of the peoples of the earth- The ensuing survey does not pretend to cover the field in all its diversity. It aims to give, in brief compass, such general facts concerning the industry in the United States as may enable the reader quickly to familiarize himself with its broader outlines. Contents CHAPTER PAGE J. The Importance and Power of Cotton . 5 II. Where Cotton is Grown and Spun and Why 10 III. The Raw Cotton Market ‘ : a LT IV. The Cloth Market ‘ : : . 27 VY. Financing Cotton and Cotton Cloth . 33 VI. American Cloth in Foreign Markets . 88 VII. Some of the Grower’s Problems oy Ad VIII. In the Cotton Mill . . . ; . AS IX. The Finishing Operations j ; . 57 The Fabric of Civilization CHAPTER I The Importance and Power of Cotton OTTON is the fabric of civilization. It has built up peoples, and has riven them apart. It has brought to the world vast and permanent wealth. It has enlisted the vision of statesmen, the genius of inventors, the courage of pioneers, the forcefulness of manufacturers, the initia- tive of merchants and shipbuilders, and the patient toil of many millions. A whole library could be written on the economic aspects of cotton alone. It could be told in detail, how and why the domination of the field of its manufacture passed from India to Spain, to Holland, and finally to England, which now shares it chiefly with the United States. The interdependence of nations which it has brought about has been the subject of numerous books and articles. Genius that Served The World’s’' Need Nor is the history of the inventions which have made possible to-day’s great production of cotton fabrics less impres- sive. From the unnamed Hindu genius of pre-Alexandrian days, through Arkwright and Eli Whitney, down to Jaquard and Northrop, the tale of cotton manufacture is a series of romances and tragedies, any one of which would be a story worth tell- ing in detail. Yet, here is a work that is by no means finished. Great inventors who will apply their genius to the im- provement of cotton growing and manu- facture are still to be born. y The present purpose, however, is to ex- plain, as briefly as maybe, the growth of the cotton industry of the United States, in its more important branches, and to en- deavor, on the basis of recognized author- ity, to indicate its position in relation to the cotton industries of the remainder of the world. America the Chief Source of Raw Material For the present, and for the future, asfar as that may be seen, the United States will have to continue to supply the greater part of the world’s raw cotton. Staples of unusual length and strength have been grown in some foreign regions, and short and inferior fibres have come from still others. But the cotton belt of the South- ern States, producing millions of bales, is the chief source of supply for all the world. The following table, taken from “The World’s Cotton Crops, 1915,” by J. A. Todd, gives the comparative production of the great cotton-growing areas, for the 1914-1915 season: America . 16,500,000 bales of 500 pounds “India . 5,000,000 “ “500 “ Egypt 1,300,000 “ “500 “ Russia 1,300,000 “ “6500 “ China 4,000,000 “ “500 “ Others 1,300,000 “ “500 « Total 29,400,000 “ “500 “ The American crop is thus approxi- mately fifty-six per cent. of the world’s [5] total. The other producing countries have shown since the beginning of the century an interesting, if not a remark- able growth, that of China being the lar- gest in quantity, and that of Russia, the largest in proportion. The American in- crease has been larger, absolutely, than that of any other region, and there is little indication that it will not continue to hold * first position. English Spinners Dominate World Market In the manufacture of cotton, Great Britain’s supremacy, while not so great proportionately as that of America in growing it, is for the present not likely to be challenged. The following table of the number of spindles in the chief manufact- uring countries is based on English figures compiled shortly before the outbreak of the World War. The number of spindles is the usual basis upon which the size of the industry is judged. It is not a perfect method, but it has fewer objections than any other: Great Britain ..... 55,576,108 United States ..... 30,579,000 Germany ......-. 10,920,426 Russia ....-..--. 8,950,000 France ....ee- 7,400,000 Indias Sos w ea ee 6,400,000 Austria... . eee 4,864,453 Italy 0 2 eo ee 4,580,000 Latin America. . . 1. 3,100,000 Japan 2 ww ee es 2,250,000 Spain... 1.2 eee 2,200,000 Belgium ......--. 1,468,838 Switzerland ...... 1,398,062 Scattering. ...... 2,499,421 Total Spindles. . 142,186,308 Such figures can be only approximate The war has brought growth in the United States and in Japan, but has cer- tainly reduced the numbers of spindles in Germany, Austria, and Russia. It is doubtful, moreover, how well the French industry has been able to maintain itself. But the tabulation is accurate enough to [6] show the relative standing of the various countries. There are, as has been indi- cated, other standards than the number of spindles. The United States, through the fact that it specializes, generally speaking, on the coarser fabrics, uses about 5,000,000 bales of cotton annually, as compared with Great Britain’s 4,000,- 000. The British product, however, sells for much more. Thus the value of the spindle standard is affirmed. England, then, produces well in excess of one-third of the cotton cloth of the world; the United States considerably more than one-fifth of it, with the other countries trailing far behind, but prospering never- theless. The Individuality of the Cotton Fibre It is a curious ruling of fate which makes the spinning of cotton fibre possible. There are many other short vegetable The cotton fibre—a highly magnified view, showing the twist fibres, but cotton is the only one which can profitably be spun into thread. Hemp and flax, its chief vegetable competitors, are both long fibred. The individuality of the cotton fibre lies in its shape. Viewed through the microscope, the fibre is seen to be, not a hollow cylinder, but rather a flattened cylinder, shaped in cross section something like the figure eight. But the chief and valuable characteristic is that the flattened cylinder is not straight, but twisted. It is this twist which gives its peculiar and overwhelm- ing importance to cotton, for without this apparently fortuitous characteristic, the spinning of cotton, if possible at all, would result in a much weaker and less durable thread. The twist makes the threads “kink” together when they are spun, and it is this kink which makes for strength and durability. Though the cotton plant seems to be native to South America, Southern Asia, Africa, and the West Indies, its cultiva- tion, was largely confined at first to India, and later to India and the British West Indies. At the beginning of the eigh- teenth century, the West Indies, because of their especial fitness for growing the longer staples were supplying about seventy per cent. of the food of the Lancashire spin- dies. The United States having made unsuccessful at- tempts to produce cotton in the early days of the colonies, first became an im- portant producing country toward the end of the eight- eenth century. American Upland cotton, by reason of its comparatively short staple, and the unevenness of the fibres, as well as the difficulty of detaching it from the seed, was decidedly inferior to some other accessible species. The Southern planters who grew it, moreover, found it next to impossible to gin it properly, the primitive roller gin of the time being un- suited to the task, and the work of pull- ing off the fibres by hand being both tedious and expensive. In 1792, the amount exported from the United States was equivalent to only 275 bales. Eli Whitney, the schoolmaster inventor of the cotton gin The next year, 1793, is the most im- portant in the history of cotton growing in the United States. In the autumn of 1792, Eli Whitney, a young Massachu- setts man who had just been graduated from Yale College, sailed from New York to South Carolina where he intended to teach school. On shipboard he met the widow of Nathaniel Greene, the Revo- lutionary general. Mrs. Greene invited the youth to begin his residence in the South on her plantation at Mulberry Grove, Georgia. Here one evening, some officers, late of General Greene’s command, were dis- cussing the great wealth which might come to the South were there a suit- able machine for removing stubborn Upland fibre from its green seed. The story goes that while the discussion was at its height, Mrs. Greene said: “Gentlemen, ap- ply to my young friend, Mr. Whit- ney. He can make anything.” Whitney com- menced work on the problem. A room was set aside as his workshop, and it was not long before he had produced the beginnings of the gin. He fixed wire teeth in a board, and found that by pulling the fibres through with his fingers he could leave the tenacious seed behind. He carried this basic idea further by putting the teeth on a cylinder and by providing a rotating brush to clean the fibre from the teeth. The changes which followed immedi- [7] ately upon the introduction of the cotton gin were tremendous in scope and almost innumerable. There was a time, before cotton became a staple, when the South led New England in manufacturing. That time passed almost immediately. Iron worksand coal mineswere abandoned, and men turned their energies from the culture of corn, rice, and indigo largely to the raising of the cotton. Expansion in Production The following figures, giving produc- tion in the equivalent of 500 pound bales for the year at the close of each ten-year period, give some idea of the tremendous expansion which ensued. By this table it will be seen that the Civil War and the freeing of the slaves held up production only temporarily. In 1914, the banner year, the crop reached the tremendous total of 16,134,930 bales of five hundred pounds each. Some little spinning had been done in the seventeenth century, but in 1787-88 the first permanent factory, built of brick, and located in Beverly, Massachusetts, on the Bass river, was put into operation by a group headed by John Cabot and Joshua Fisher. This factory failed to justify itself economically, chiefly because of the crudeness of its machinery. But Samuel Slater, newly come from England with models of the Arkwright machinery in y oe his brain, set up a factory in Pawtucket ear : i 1700 Ss Rae oe ae ed 3,138 in 1790. From that time forth the growth 1800 sa +e eae ew 8 73,222 was steady and sure, if not always ex- TSO 5 Sac Gh aac By wees 177,824 tremely rapid. Tee a dpi tig wade 334,728 1830 .......... 732,218 The following table,* which covers the TSA0" Sk eyes ee we 1,347,640 whole country, relates particularly to New ee ee Soci England in the years before 1880, because WEE km mn aes 4.024.527 the cotton manufacturing industry until do ine es Bie ,024, _ TSSO. de Gel say wei cee en 6,356,998 ‘then was largely concentrated there. It EOD ae bee iad shows how the manufacturing interests of aa - i, 608,616 the country profited by the discovery that 1917 ...... . 11,302,375 brought wealth to the agricultural South: Number : Cotton o~ of Number Used Number Value of Year Estab- of m of Product in lish- Spindles Million | Employes Dollars ments Pounds TSlOr st ch ely Ree awe 87000) |) asses | awante |] sade irnaiv 1820s ke a we eats 220-0004) |) smitten || edad ni) Cg ey ee 18380. 4 se a HY a 8 795 1,200,000 77.8 62,177 $32,000,000 1340) ww ee ee 1240 2,300,000 113.1 72,119 46,400,000 PS50% sche ote lay eee a 1094 3,600,000 276.1 92,286 61,700,000 PBGO)