BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME PROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Henrg W. Sage 1891 Aj-^6My /f/^/^p2L 1^43 Cornell University Library JK1759 .B84 American citizenshii olin 3 1924 030 478 964 The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030478964 YALE LECTURES ON THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENSHIP AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP YALE LECTURES BY DAVID J* BEEWER ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES NEW YORK CHARLES SORIBNBE'S SONS 1902 UOPTBIGHT, lata, HT YALE UNIVERSITY PubliBhed, AprU. 1902 TROW DIRECTORY PRINTING AND BOOKBINDING COMPANV NEW YORK In May, 1900, Honorable William E. Dodge, of New York, made provision for lectures be- fore the students of Yale University, to be known as the "Yale Lectures on the Eespon- sibilities of Citizenship" and to be on a " topic whose understanding wiU contribute to the formation of an intelligent public senti- ment, of high standards of the duty of a Chris- tian citizen, and of habits of action to give effect to these sentiments and these standards." Having been honored by selection to deliver the first course of these lectures I have felt that it was fitting to present a few plain, simple, commonplace truths in respect to those respon- sibilities, thus laying, as it were, a foundation upon which succeeding lecturers might in a more ambitious way develop some particular form of responsibility, or some particular ap- peal to noble action. With this in view I have prepared the following lectures. CONTENTS PASB I. Obligations of Citizenship .... 3 II. The Maintenance of a Good Char- acter A Primary Obligation op Every Citizen 31 III. Service a Responsibility of Citizen- ship 61 IV. Obligation of Obedience .... 85 V. The Duty of Striving to Better THE Life of the Nation .... 107 OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP OBMQATIOUrS OF CITIZENSHIP Out of all the relations into which human beings enter, or are brought, there spring obli- gations — obligations resting upon each party to the relationship, yet varying in the specific duties imposed with the character of the re- lationship and the place each occupies therein. In many relationships the existence of obli- gations is obvious and universally recognized. In others the fact of obligation is not always conceded, frequently not appreciated, and not infrequently ignored. Thus, no one doubts that when man and woman enter into the mar- riage relation certain obligations are thereby imposed upon each. All recognize that there immediately springs up and continues during the existence of that relation a mutuality of obligation, although the character of the duties 4 AMEEIOAN CITIZENSHIP imposed upon each by virtue thereof may be different. A business partnership creates, as all readily perceive and acknowledge, certain obligations on the part of each to the other. A distinct disregard by either party to a mar- riage, or by either member of a partnership, of the obligations created by such relationship re- ceives general condemnation. There are other relationships, not so close and intimate, which also cast obligations upon each party thereto, and yet the fact and sig- nificance of those obligations often make little impression on the parties bound thereby. We owe certain duties to our neighbors, but upon how many of us the burden of those duties rests lightly or is wholly forgotten? In a general way we say that we ought to be neighborly, and yet too often all that we do is to let our neigh- bors alone, and ask them to let us alone. Who is our neighbor ? is a frequent question. The Great Teacher answered it in the story of the Good Samaritan, as the one we meet in life whom we can help and do help. It may also be afOrmed that there is one universal relation- OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 5 ship in that we are all memhers of one great human family, and that out of that relation- ship spring obligations which no right-thiaking man will ignore. It was a noble utterance of the ancient Eoman, "nihil humanum mihi aliennm est." As I stated, the mere fact of relationship car- ries obligations, and it matters not whether that relationship is one voluntarily entered into, or one ia which we are placed without our consent. Marriage is a relation voluntarily entered into. On the other hand, a child is bom into a family, and without its consent the relation of child to parent is established, and yet none the less do obligations spring from that relationship. We are not only born into families but also into citizenship in a nation, and so long as the relationship springing out of that birth continues there are obligations resting upon us as citizens which cannot be ignored. These obligations are the responsibili- ties of citizenship. One may at the same time be subject to many relationships, and sometimes the obligations 6 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP springing out of those different relationships apparently antagonize each other. One may be under a relationship of marriage, of part- nership, of parent, of citizen, and the varied duties springing from those several relation- ships may seem to conflict. He may have to determine which carries the higher obligation; but the possibility of conflict does not alter the fact that there are duties springing from each of those relationships. Again, many of the obligations which spring from the relationships of life are not enforcible by human law or the decrees of a court. They are called imperfect obligations because, as said with gentle satire, law which is the perfection of reason takes no notice of them. They are cognizable only in the forum of conscience. But ofttimes they are felt to be the most sacred, and this partly because they appeal alone to the higher element in our nature and have no sanction in exterior force. Take the relation of parent and child. Municipal law enforces — perhaps not always satisfactorily — at any rate it attempts to enforce the obliga- OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 7 tion of the parent to care for the minor child. It is certainly one of those obligations which the law recognizes, no matter how poorly it may succeed in its enforcement; but when the child has arrived at maturity and the parent passed into the weakness of old age then that high moral obligation which rests upon the child to care for the failing parent is one which the law does not recognize or attempt to enforce. " Over the hiU to the poorhouse " expresses the imperfection of human law, and yet to every right-thinking person the obliga- tion to care for the aged parent is as sacred as any. No sweeter picture in life can be seen than that of son or daughter who, in memory of corresponding care in days of infancy, toils through the years of manhood or womanhood to care for the parent in the failing strength of old age. Take another illustration: One obli- gation of husband and wife to each other is that of helpfulness and courtesy. But if the treat- ment of either to the other only comes short of cruelty the law takes no notice of it. Still who does not feel that the inability or inatten- AMEKIUAN CITIZEN BHlii' tion of the law detracts in no degree from the sacredness of this obligation? Even the very- much neglected courtesies called for by the temporary relationship of fellow-passengers in a street-car are in the truest and highest sense duties, and duties whose faithful discharge car- ries, like virtue, its own reward. Indeed, may 1 not stop to say that among the things which make for the sweetness and real glory of one's life is a keen recognition of those obligations which are outside the domain of law. Again, a fact worthy of notice in respect to all obligations is that the more perfectly one discharges them the greater the blessings which come from the relationship out of which they spring. The mother who is most faithful to the child during its early days finds in the future years of its life the highest reward of motherhood. "These are my jewels," cried the mother of the Gracchi. The ripened man- hood and womanhood of her children become her crown of joy and rejoicing, and their affec- tion and tender care are the sweetest comfort that a mother ever knows. A partner who is OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 9 most faithful to his partnership obligations will find that partnership most fruitful of re- sult. The neighbor who is most neighborly feels, as no one else, the blessing of being and having a neighbor. And yet it is one of the paradoxes of life that in order to attain the full blessings of a discharge of obligation, such discharge must not be with a thought of pur- chase, with the hope of compensation, but from the pure sense of obligation. You cannot se- cure the great rewards of life by working for them. There is an unfailing truth in the declaration, "he that saveth his life shall lose it and he that loseth his life shaU save it." Duty done because it is duty carries the crown and the laurel. Indeed, there is no more mag- nificent word in the English language than " duty." As Whittier says : " There's life alone in duty done, And rest alone in striving." The existence of relationship, at least in cases in which both parties are competent to act intelligently, carries with it a mutuality of 10 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP obligation. The husband, by virtue of the re- lationship of marriage, owes certain duties to the wife. Conversely, the wife owes duties to the husband. The mere fact of the relation- ship imposes obligations on each. So, in the case of parent and child, as soon as the child comes to an age of understanding there is a measure of obligation resting upon him to the parent, as well as upon the parent to him. Now, the fact that either party to a relation- ship may wholly ignore the obligations created thereby does not necessarily release the other from the performance of his duties. Indeed, sometimes the dereliction of the one seems to increase or at least emphasize the duty of the other. There is often the not unreasonable ex- pectation that greater faithfulness on the part of the one will renew the neglected fidelity of the other. Take the familiar example of hus- band and wife. Delinquency on the part of one does not excuse the other from fidelity. It may be that no rule can be stated which will fit all cases, and yet the possibility of restoring the helpfulness of the relation and OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 11 re-establishing the sense of duty on the part of the delinquent is always to be considered. Who can number the multitude of cases in which an increased fidelity on the part of one has brought the other back to a sense of duty ? Indeed, such restoration is not infrequently a blessed result of duty done. It is obviously a case of salvage. Every one familiar with Ad- miralty knows that the compensation in such cases is large and generous, and so the salvage which one party to any relationship in life ought to receive and does receive on the restora- tion of the other through his or her increased fidelity, is among the great compensations of life. He that saveth a soul from death shall hide a multitude of sins. While all relationships impose' obligations on the parties thereto, the character and force of those obligations vary with the nature of the relationship. Some are stronger and more im- portant than others; some more continuous in their force, and some the performance of which affects a larger number of persons. In order, therefore, to a full understanding of the scope 12 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP and significance of such obligations it is not enough to determine the fact of a relationship ; it is necessary to inquire into its nature and conditions, and consider whether it is mainly personal, or one directly or indirectly affecting many. With these preliminary observations, I pass on to say that among the relationships in life out of which spring obligations is that of the individual to the nation or tribe of which he is a citizen or member. And here I start with the broad proposition that whatever may be the position, capacity, or surroundings of the in- dividual, and whatever may be the character of his nation or tribe, or its fidelity to its corre- sponding obligations, he is always under obli- gations to that nation or tribe. A member of the most savage tribe in the centre of Africa owes certain duties to it and to its chief, and the same is true of the citizen of the most civ- ilized nation in the world. While there is a similarity in the nature of those obligations, yet it is clear that their significance and reach vary largely with the conditions in which the OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 13 individual is placed and the character of the tribe or nation to which he belongs. Contrast, for instance, the obligations of an uneducated savage to his tribe with those of the President of Yale University to the United States. There may be like duty of service and obedi- ence, and yet the obligations in the one case are much more important and far-reaching than in the other, and of greater significance to the individual and to the race. Indeed, it may be laid down as a general proposition that the higher the status of the two parties to any relationship the more far-reaching are the obligations which spring therefrom, and the more significant and important is the full dis- charge of those obligations. The manner in which the citizen of a savage tribe discharges his obligations to that tribe, whether well or ill, means less for the general weal or woe than the way in which a citizen of the United States discharges his obligations. And it is because in the one case the parties to the relationship are of more importance to the well-being of the world than those in the other. 14 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP Of all the obligations of citizen to nation none is greater than those of one of our citizens to the Republic. The responsibilities of citi- zenship are nowhere more sacred and solemn. To impress this truth is the purpose of these lectures. Let me notice some of the facts which justify the assertion. First, this Ee- publie occupies a unique and prominent posi- tion among the nations. It may be there are other nations with more territory or popula- tion, larger military and naval forces, a greater accumulation of wealth, or a longer history, but not one whose history has been more significant, in whose present the world is more interested, and above whose future there spans a brighter rainbow of hope and promise for humanity. This is a government of and by and for the people. It rests upon the thought that to each individual belong the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of hap- piness. It affirms that the nation exists not for the benefit of one man, or set of men, but to secure to each and all the fullest op- portunity for personal development. It stands OBLIGATIONS OP CITIZENSHIP 15 over against the governments of the Old World in that there the thought is that the indi- vidual lives for the nation; here, that the na- tion exists for the individual. It was estab- lished in a place, at a time, and under circum- stances peculiarly unique and fortunate — con- ditions which can never be repeated, and if the effort here made to establish popular govern- ment fails we may well believe that the failure will be final and irretrievable. As Webster said: "If, ia our ease, the representative sys- tem ultimately fails, popular governments must be pronounced impossible. No combina- tion of circumstances more favorable to the ex- periment can ever be expected to occur. The last hopes of mankind, therefore, rest with us; and if it should be proclaimed that our example had become an argument against the experi- ment, the knell of popular liberty would be sounded throughout the earth." It was established by the most earnest and resolute men of the most virile races the world has ever developed. The place was a new con- tinent, separated by three thousand miles of ID AMEBICAN CITIZENSHIP boisterous ocean from the nations and civiliza- tion of the Old World, at a time when the peoples and the nations of that world were beginning to be moved by forces which soon involved all of them in prolonged conflict. They who formed the Eepublie were too few in nimiber and too poor in resources to ap- peal very strongly to the greed of the distant monarchs. They were by themselves and they were left to themselves. Their leaders were men of clear conviction, resolute and conscien- tious. They were not blind to the lessons of the past and they had unswerving faith in the possibilities of the future. They were rea- sonable radicals and progressive conservatives. They were not dazzled by power or glory or wealth. Coming here under the impulse of strong convictions they meant to establish the best home for man on the face of the earth. Thus situated and thus protected the Eepub- lie grew in numbers and wealth until it be- came strong enough to resist the attack of any nation, and now is so strong as to be a recog- nized leader among the nations. It has blazed OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 17 the way for popular government. Other na- tions have followed in its footsteps and estab- lished like governments. Yet none has become its equal; something has always been lacking. Either while the form has been Eepublican the substance has been despotism, or else the people have had no respect for the form. Elections, instead of being settlements securing stability of rulers and confirming matters of policy for stated periods, have been simply invitations to revolution, while neither life nor property has been sacred. Far be it for me to affirm that we have lived up to our ideals. I am making no Fourth of July speech. On the contrary, our history has disclosed many shortcomings. We have not been free from the weaknesses of human nat- ure. But, notwithstanding all our failures, nowhere has there been a closer living to the ideals of popular government, and nowhere are the possibilities of future success greater. If, therefore, the chief object of national existence is to secure to each individual the fullest pro- tection in all inalienable rights and the fullest ±0 AMEHIOAN CITIZENSHIP opportunity for personal advancement, and if this nation has come nearer than any other to the realization of this ideal, and if hy virtue of its situation, its population, its development, it has the greatest promise of a full realization of this ideal in the future, surely it must be that the obligations of its citizens to it are nowhere surpassed. Again, the significance of the responsibilities of citizenship in this Eepublic also appears in the fact that here each man is a ruler. It goes without saying that where there is a single ruler, whether the chieftain of a savage tribe or the monarch of a civilized nation, the duty of that ruler to his tribe or nation is one of supreme importance. Its welfare depends largely upon his actions, and as so m^uch rests upon his ac- tions by just so much is increased his duty of rendering the best service. The pure and noble life of Queen Victoria has exalted the British nation. Now, government of the peo- ple, that government which exists among us, means that each man is a ruler ; each shares the responsibility of government. And if each OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 19 man is a ruler then upon each rests the obliga- tion of a ruler. That there are many rulers may diminish the effect of the separate action of any single one, but it does not change the fact that upon each rests the obligation of ruler. Upon him lies the burden of govern- ment. As he acts so the nation acts. And there is no man in this country who can say he has nothing to do with the action of the gov- ernment. Le Grand Monarque, in the arro- gance of his power, is said to have exclaimed, " The State ! I am the State." With him the thought was that the whole purpose and life of the State centred in himself. In a different but equally true and a far nobler sense every American can say, "The Nation! I am the Nation." And that fact of personal responsi- bility, that sense of governmental duty, gives strength and importance to the responsibilities of the American citizen. Still again, this is a christian nation. Not that the people have made it so by any legal enactment or that there exists an established church, but christian in the sense that the <6V AMJSKIUAJN UlTlZJfiJN HMlJi' dominant thought and purpose of the nation accord with the great principles taught by the founder of Christianity. Historically it has developed along the lines of that religion. Its first settlements were in its name, and while every one is welcome, whether a believer in Christianity or in any other religion, or in no religion, yet the principles of Christianity are the foundations of our social and political life.' It needs no judicial decision to determine this fact. The commission to Columbus was from " Ferdinand and Isabella, by the grace of God, king and queen of Castile," and recited that "it is hoped that by God's assistance some of the continents and islands in the ocean will be discovered." The first colonial grant from the crown of England, in 1584, authorizing the grantee to enact statutes, provided that " they be not against the true christian faith now pro- fessed in the church of England." The first charter of Virginia, in 1606, recited that it was granted in hopes of the "propagating of chris- tian religion to such people as yet live in dark- ness and miserable ignorance of the true knowl- OBLIGATIONS OF CITIZENSHIP 21 edge and worship of God." The Mayflower compact declared that its colonial settlement was " for the glory of God and for the advance- ment of the christian faith." The fundament- al orders of Connecticut recited that they were established " to maintain and preserve the lib- erty and the purity of the gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess." Running through other colonial charters, in the Declara- tion of Independence, in the Constitutions of the various States, in the proceedings in courts, and in those official declarations which are the manifestations of the organized will of the na- tion, there is the constant recognition of the fact that Christianity is the underlying thought of our national life. It is in that sense as truly a christian nation as is England with its Established Church, or as is Turkey a Mohammedan nation with the Koran as its officially declared sacred book. Indeed, the very fact that it has no Established Church makes one of its highest credentials to the title of a christian nation. The great thought of the Master was that over the human AMEKICAN CITIZENSHIP a part of the nation's morality. I mention this first because it is of primary importance, an obligation which is binding upon aU citizens, and binding at all times and in all places. There is no break or cessation in its force, and there are no conditions or circumstances under or by which any citizen is released from its demands. It is the one duty which underlies aU others ; with it we may hope to realize something of the greatness and nobility of citizenship in this republic; without it the loudest voices of as- sumed patriotism are but sounding brass and tinkling cymbals. What is good character ? It is righteousness in the soul. It is the shining jewel of life, that to which we all look up, which we all love and admire. It makes the chasm which separates man from the brute, the " great gulf fixed" which the brute cannot cross and the man ought not to cross. It is the link which binds him to the divine. In flesh we are brothers of the beast, living without thought; unmoved by conscience, ignorant of purity and GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 37 dying without hope or remorse. In nobility of soul, in elevation of character, we are heirs not merely of the ages but of eternity; we clasp hands with the Infinite and Eternal, and are bold to say " of thee, and thine." One seldom sinks so low in the scale of be- ing as not to have respect and admiration for the high and noble. He never becomes so far in love with his own vices as not to be touched with respect for him who has them not. " A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favor rather than silver and gold." We long for it ourselves, and we joy to see it in our homes, our friends, and in all with whom we are thrown in contact. With it heaven may begin on earth; without it death is not needed for admission to hell. Who does not wish that death would bring him such tribute as this from an English poet to an English General ? Strew not on the hero's hearse Garlands of a herald's verse : Let us hear no words of Fame Sounding loud a deathless name : 38 AMEKIOAN CITIZENSHIP Tell us of no vauntful Glory Shouting forth her haughty story. All life long his homage rose To far other shrine than those. " In hoc signo," pale nor dim, Lit the battle-field for him, And the prize he sought and won. Was the Crown for Duty done. There is power also in character. I know there are many who think that it is enough to be smart; that brains are the only thing that count in this world ; that you may live and act as you please; that you may safely get the bet- ter of others, by ways however crooked, pro- vided they do not end in the penitentiary. I am not disposed to belittle the value of brains. I am not underwriting the idiot. I am aware that success often attends those who know noth- ing of the Golden Kule, and who remember only so much of the Decalogue as is framed in the penal statutes. I know there may be brilliancy going hand in hand with vice; and yet, after all, one of the strongest forces that make for individual success is character. Looking back through life at the multitudes I have known. GOOD CHARACTEK A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 39 I have no hesitation in saying that the majority of the successful ones owe whatever of success they have attained as much if not more to their characters as to their hrains. And by far the greater number of failures have been due not , to lack of capacity, or even want of opportu- nity, but to the fact that when tested their characters failed, and they proved unworthy of confidence. So it is that character is not only the beautiful thing ; it is the valuable thing. And that which is true of the individual is also true of the nation. Its good character is its beauty and strength. If it is to be loved and honored it must be honest and just. It must stand firm against all wrong, and uphold every effort for right; hold evermore the even scales of justice and the strong hand of honesty. That a nation, as such, has a character, and is known by it, is obvious. True, it is often said that a corporation has neither body to be kicked nor soul to be damned, and many seem to think that the organization of individuals into a corporate body creates an . artificial 40 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP entity destitute of moral qualities. Doubtless many corporate acts proceed upon the theory that the acting body has no moral qualities, and can never be held delinquent in the forum of conscience. And that which is said of private corporations is also affirmed of that large cor- porate body called the nation; but both reason and history protest against such an assertion of moral poverty. The organization of individu- als into a corporate body, whether small or great, local or national, is not a movement out- side the domain of morals, does not eliminate the matter of character, does not create a mere machine like a steam-engine unaffected by con- science, but simply puts into an organic whole the combined consciences, characters and mo- rality of all the individual members. You never would call that a temperance community, half of whose citizens went home every night intoxicated, and this notwithstanding the fact that its ordinances contained the finest body of temperance legislation ever written. Their actions would contradict their words. You would not think that a moral city on whose GOOD CHAKACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATIOUT 41 every street were the gilded palaces of sin. You would not call that an honest community, none of whose citizens paid their debts, and this although it was full of lawyers; nor that a healthy place where only the doctors did a thriving business. Historically, we all know that nations as well as cities are spoken of as possessed of certain characteristics and accus- tomed to certain lines of actions, which char- acteristics and actions are simply manifesta- tions of their characters. ; It may be said that character is a personal matter, that the maintenance of one which is free from stain is the discharge of a duty to one's self, or, at most, only to one's family and friends, or to God. I do not question the force of the obligation in all these directions, but I assert that in addition thereto the making and keeping of a high and noble character is one of the duties of the individual to the nation, and to be numbered among the responsibilities of citizenship. A nation may be regarded in a twofold as- pect. In the one it is to be viewed as standing 42 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP over against the individual, an artificial entity separate and distinct from all its citizens, thus coming closely within the definition of a cor- poration, as given by Chief Justice Marshall; in the other, and a perfectly consistent aspect, it is to be regarded as an aggregation of indi- viduals. In the one it is a unit; in the other a collection of units. In either case the moral element is the bright coloring of the picture. We speak of international law as a body of rules regulating the intercourse of nations. In this the nation is an artificial entity — an in- corporeal being — a unit among nations, one whose conduct is to be regulated by certain rules adopted by the family of nations. This individuality, this singleness of national life, is as true of this Republic as of any other nation, and this whether we say. The United States of America are, or The United States of America is. The one expression simply indicates the Federal system under which the nation exists. A nation in its dealings with other nations is bound to certain rules of conduct which it is universally conceded should be founded upon GOOD CHAEAOTEE A PEIMAEY OBLIGATION 43 justice and righteousness. The declaration of scripture, "righteousness exalteth a nation; but sin is a reproach to any people," is a sound maxim of international law. Indeed, some writers have gone so far as to assert that such declaration is the foundation upon which that law rests, and that by it alone, and without regard to actual approval or practical recog- nition by the nations, may be determined whether a certain course of conduct has the sanction of international law. Be that as it may, the moral element in a nation's life, look- ing at it as one among many nations, is beyond dispute. Again, while we look upon the nation in its relations to other nations and for the purpose of determining its international rights and duties as a unit, in the other aspect every na- tion or tribe is only an assemblage of many in- dividuals. As in this aspect it is the aggre- gation of the lives and forces of all its citizens, so its character is the combined total of their characters. If they are all savages, the tribe or nation is itself a savage tribe or nation. If 44 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP all are civilized and enlightened the nation is civilized and enlightened. In other words, the nation is not simply the numerical aggregation of so many individuals, but is the combination of all the mental and moral characteristics of those individuals. That which can be afiBrmed of all the citizens may with equal truth be af- firmed of the nation. You cannot disassociate the character of the nation and that of its citi- zens. You cannot have an ideally perfect na- tion, the citizens of which are thoroughly bad; and if all the citizens live up to the highest possibilities of their lives you may be sure that the nation of which they are citizens stands out before the world as one whose ideals are of the highest. A good man does not intentionally do a bad act. Ten good men acting together are equally honest, and so if all the citizens of a nation are animated by the one high purpose the acts of the nation will likewise be above the plane of intentional wrong. Two things may be noticed of the olligation in respect to personal character: One, that it is universal; and the other, that it is continu- GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 45 ous. There are certain duties which rest upon some citizens and do not rest upon all. Thus, some are called upon to render military ser- vice ; others to perform the functions of jurors ; to discharge duties attaching to certain offices; and yet it cannot be said of all citizens of both sexes that they are alike amenable to all these obligations and called upon to render the same services. The varied conditions and circum- stances of life impose certain duties upon some which are not cast upon others, but the obli- gation of personal character is one resting alike upon each and all. As one member of the body politic his individual character enters into the sum total of all characters, and thus goes to make up that of the nation. It is also continuous, and this because human character is itself a continuous thing. It is not made up of one or many acts. Indeed, actions are but evidences thereof. We judge of a man's character by his conduct, although we know that the two are not always alike. Hypocrisy may exist. There may be not only a difference but an absolute antagonism be- 46 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP tween the two. And yet a noble character is sure to express itself in actions of a like nature. "By their fruits shall ye know them" is the best rule we have. And character is the thing of value, the enduring fact. It is continuous, is part of the life. And this is true both of the individual and the nation. No one can excuse himself from his duty to the State to establish and maintain a good per- sonal character on the plea that he is but one of a great multitude, and therefore his single life and character count for little or nothing. Doubtless the influence of one bad man is more obvious in a small than in a large society. If a commimity were composed of but ten per- sons, of whom half were good and the other half bad, who would not expect the latter half to make a powerful impression on the general life? While, on the other hand, if it were composed of a hundred and only five were bad the numerical predominance of the good would go far to establish a good character in the or- ganized whole. But the presence of even a single bad man in any society is an influence GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 47 for evil. It is a blot on its character. A sin- gle flaw in a diamond detracts from its worth, and although the great mass of the crystal be perfectly pure yet the single flaw is always seen and discredits the value. If there be but one black sheep in a flock every passer-by notices that sheep, and so a single bad man in a com- munity becomes an obvious element of dis- grace. Nor is it a mere question of appear- ance. It is not simply that there is a flaw — a black sheep. The influence of that man is constantly for evil. " A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump," and character is one of those potent things which, going out beyond the in- dividual, touches for good or for ill all within its reach. No man liveth unto himself alone. We stamp our impress on the immediate com- munity in which we dwell, and through that community affect for weal or woe the great na- tion of which we are a part. The inexperi- enced, the unwary, all become more or less affected by a bad man's influence, and over the community as a whole the shadow rests. So no man can say that he is but one in a thou- 48 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP sand and it matters not that he is vile, that his character is bad, for not only will his bad character cast a shadow but also will his influ- ence reach and demoralize far and wide. But one may say this is all very true of those who are rulers, who hold the offices, who are the leaders in society, whose opinions are quoted, whose power is felt, but as for me, I have neither office nor power, I am never men- tioned in the papers, I live an unnoticed life, and therefore what difference does my charac- ter make in the national life. It is undoubt- edly true that the higher the position a man holds, and the greater the influence he pos- sesses, the more important is his good character to the community. All appreciate this. Cor- ruption in the President or venality in the- Supreme Court would be a terrible blow to the nation's good name. Licentiousness, if any exists, on the part of the nation's represent- atives, is carefully concealed; and Mr. Eoberts, of Utah, appreciates the fact that even a Con- gressman is not permitted to have more than one wife at a time. High position carries with GOOD CHAEAOTEB A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 49 it added responsibility. "Noblesse ohlige." Of him to whom ten talents were given ten talents additional were required. Yet it is equally true that he to whom a single talent was given was not excused for leaving that talent idle. No one, however humble, can re- lieve himself from responsibility. He may be but one out of many, but he is one, and con- tributes to make up the general character. He pours his breath into the social atmosphere, and if that breath be poisonous he to some extent contaminates the air. What would be the standing of this nation if only its presi- dents and judges were pure and honest ? Does any one suppose that the character of the na- tion would be determined by the few holding those positions? Indeed, how can we expect that they who occupy representative places will continue pure and honest if the great mass of the people are not? If the atmosphere in which these few live is filled with poison can they escape its effect? Are they not in fact upheld and strengthened in good conduct by their surroundings of good character? Is not 50 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP the integrity of our officials largely owing to the integrity of the American people? I have been thirty-six years on the bench and no one, directly or indirectly, by word of mouth or let- ter, or in any other way, ever proposed, sug- gested, or intimated that any decision I might be called on to make would be for my benefit pecuniarily, politically, socially, or otherwise. If I had had any desire to do wrong I should have had to seek someone to corrupt me. In order to be tempted I should have had to invite the tempter, instead of waiting for the tempta- tion. Would I have been able to say this if the great body of the people among whom my life has been cast had been corrupt ? Could I have hoped to escape temptation to do wrong? So that, after all, the clean lives of those in posi- tion are not a little owing to the good char- acter of those who place them there, and who support them there. We are all proud of the fact that this Re- public has maintained so high a character dur- ing the century of its existence. While there are doubtless many things in its history which GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 51 we wish were not there, yet we rejoice to believe that generally, both in its inner life and in its dealings with other nations, it has striven for those things which make for truth, justice, honesty and purity. While we are justly proud of all its material development, its increase in population, its growth in wealth, and in all those things which go to make up its outward tangible prosperity, we rejoice the more in that which it has done to uphold before the world ideals of the highest kind. We point to its efforts to meliorate the hardships of war, and all that it has done in the way of arbitration and peace; to that which it has done to protect its citizens against oppression and wrong, wherever they may have chanced to be; to all that it has spoken and done for lib- erty; to the grandeur of that civil war, waged to put an end to slavery within its borders ; to its assumption of the burdens of war in behalf of a people struggling for liberty, a people bound to us by no ties of blood, yet so situated that action in their behalf was simply writing the blessed word neighior into the vocabulary 52 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP of nations; and to countless other acts of lofty character, and are proud of our country. And let us ever remember in our rejoicing, that the sources and causes of every noble thing in our country's life are to be found in the thoughts and lives of individual citizens who have suc- ceeded in transferring something of their own high characters into the life of the nation. And so remembering, let us ever strive to dis- charge one of the responsibilities of citizenship by maintaining in our own lives a like lofty character. As a nation we stand face to face with a great fact. The century and more of our na- tional life has been lived in a career of self- development, and with an isolation from other nations suggested by the words of wisdom in the farewell address of the Father of His Coun- try. We have stood aloof from the great events of the other hemisphere, endeavoring to main- tain a position of equal justice to all, but of equal separation from all, content to uphold that which we call the Monroe Doctrine, the separation and consecration of this continent GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 53 to those ideas of popular government which lie at the foundation of this nation's life. But we enter the new century under changed condi- tions. Commerce, whose mandate no law can stay, whose excursions no legislature can check, is bringing us, whether we will or no, into the great council of nations. The ac- cumulated products of our territory are pour- ing into every quarter of the globe, seeking a market. Our marvellous inventive genius, showing itself in wonderful mechanical con- trivances, is looking beyond the bounds of the new continent for places in which it may find some adequate compensation. Japan, one na- tion in the silent Orient, felt the touch of our national activity, and she has passed out of ob- scurity into the great life of the world, and to-day stands as one of its magnificent factors. China, that great mass of an effete civilization, moving yet moving slowly even in the wondrous disturbances which now agitate it, turns with abimdant faith to this nation for help in its time of distress. So, whether we wished it or not, we are forced into a position where our 54 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP national life is not simply to be considered in reference to those within our territory but as an important and dominant fact in the great councils of the world. Shall we in these coun- cils, and in our dealings with others, f oUow the Talleyrand notion that language is something to conceal rather than to express thought, or shall we stand as one nation at least whose pur- poses and life are measured by absolute truth and honesty — a nation which has no secondary and concealed motive in its dealings with oth- ers; a nation which always says what it means and means what it says, and strives to have every utterance in accord with the highest dictates of truth and justice? Many of our citizens are to-day troubled by the fact that, as the outcome of the late war with Spain, we have taken distant islands with a large population of a character illy in accord with that of the Anglo-Saxon. We wonder what the outcome of this venture will be. Earnest discussion fills the papers, the halls of Congress, and comes into the great tribunal of the nation. What are the bounds of our power GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 55 over those people, and what must be, in accord with our constitutional limitations, the measure of our duties to them? As one of that tri- bunal, before which some of those questions are pending, I can, of course, say nothing as to its decisions, but I may say that far above all questions of constitutional limitation, far above all the problems which courts may be called on to solve, is the hopeful and assuring thought that a solemn sense of responsibility fills the American soul. If they who to-day compose the great body of recognized American people shall lift their own lives up into the purity demanded by high character, if they shall measure their intercourse with the dwell- ers in these insular possessions by the rules of true manhood, it is a secondary matter what may be the decisions of the courts, the policy of the Administration, or the action of Con- gress, for we may be sure that the nation will move, with or without constitutional amend- ment, along that great highway which is full of blessing to all within its jurisdiction, and to the great world which surrounds it. 56 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP I want, with all the solemnity of a life that has been earnestly lived, with all that comes from years of experience in varied directions, to appeal to you, young gentlemen, lovers of your country, loyal to all its best interests, with unbounding faith in its future, willing to live and to serve, and to die if need be for its honor and glory, I want to press upon you this after- noon the thought that one grand way in which all can do abundantly for its glory and life is in building up within yourselves that pure and lofty personal character which makes the indi- vidual loved, which gives him power, and causes his life to become a blessing to his com- munity, his nation, and the world. The dawn of the new century is a great oc- casion. I wish it were my privilege to enter into its marvellous opportunities, to take part in the wondrous works which it is to see and to do. That privilege belongs to youth — to educated youth, to eager, aspiring, consecrated youth; youth which sees the sunlight flush with its crimson glow the eastern skies and will watch with attendant hearts that glow deepen- GOOD CHARACTER A PRIMARY OBLIGATION 57 ing and strengthening into noontide splendor and glory. And yet if I may not be with you to share and see that which is to come, I may to-day join you in Whittier's thanksgiving and prayer : Our father's God 1 From out whose hand The centuries fall like grains of sand. We meet to-day, united, free. And loyal to our land and Thee, To thank Thee for the era done And trust Thee for the opening one. For art and labor met in truce, For beauty made the bride of use. We thank Thee ; but withal we crave The austere virtues strong to save— The honor proof to place or gold The manhood never bought or sold. O make Thou us through centuries long, In peace secure, in justice strong ; Around our gift of freedom draw The safeguards of our righteous law ; And, cast in some diviner mold. Let the new cycle shame the old. SERVICE A RESPONSIBILITY OF CITIZENSHIP Ill SERVICE A RESPONSIBILITY OP CITIZENSHIP A second matter in respect to the responsi- bilities of a citizen, worthy of notice, is the duty of service. It may be said that in a cer- tain sense this form of obligation attends every relation and is binding on both parties thereto. There is no one so high and none so low, as not to owe the duty of service. " I came not to be ministered unto but to minister unto oth- ers," said the Master, and to indicate the nobil- ity and worth of service. He added, "he who would be chief est among you let him be servant of all." But while service may be said to at- tend every relation and be one element in its obligations yet the kinds and modes of service vary with the relation. The service which a child is called upon to render to its parent is different from that which a citizen owes to the nation. And so I proceed to mention some of 61 63 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP the kinds of service which the citizen owes to the nation, and shall then consider the spirit and manner in which those services should be rendered. There are certain services which are willing- ly rendered. For instance, the average Amer- ican is willing to hold oflBce, discharge its duties and receive its emoluments. We seldom have to force a man to take office. Undoubtedly the discharge of the duties of an office to which one is called by his fellow-citizens is an act of ser- vice to the nation. It may be a conspicuous act and sometimes quite profitable. At any rate, a glamour surrounds the holding of office, which makes it very acceptable to many. So, it seems almost a matter of supererogation to say that when one is elected or appointed to an office he owes to the nation the duty of dis- charging its functions. Yet holding and faith- fully performing all the duties of an office is not merely a privilege ; it is an obligation, and one whose neglect may be punished criminally. I have never known an instance of a man being prosecuted for refusing to accept the office of OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 63 United States Senator. No man need lie awake worrying about his liability to criminal process if he declines to accept the office of gov- ernor. On the contrary, he is more likely to be applauded for repudiating the obligation which election to ofBce imposes than to be prosecuted therefor. There are quite a num- ber always willing to take the burden ofE his shoulders. And yet there are records of judi- cial prosecution and punishment for the failure to accept and discharge the duties of certain minor oflBees. The position of road overseer or constable is not congenial to many, and not unnaturally they seek to escape therefrom. Tenacious of the right to hold each one to the duties of an office to which he has been elected the English Parliament has a pleasant way of enabling a man to resign his seat therein. While private business may not Justify such resignation it is held that he may vacate that office if he accepts another of equal dignity; and so when a member of Parliament de- sires to resign he secures an appointment to the Stewardship of the Chiltern Hundreds, 64 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP and then may surrender his place in Parlia- ment. Another case in which there is a duty of ser- vice, and one enforced by law, is that connected with the military and naval forces of the na- tion. He who enters either, whether volun- tarily or by means of a draft, must endure all its dangers and toils. He may not avoid them without rendering himself amenable to punish- ment. This proceeds upon the theory that the nation, to protect its life and enforce its laws, may compel the active efEort of all its citizens. But believing that the time will come when the war-drum shall beat no longer and the battle- flags be furled, I do not stop to enlarge upon the special duties of military service. One important service is connected with the administration of justice. We are called upon to act as witnesses and jurors. How many gladly avoid the discharge of those duties ? It is astonishing when a jury list is summoned to find how many sick people there are on it. I do not wonder that they are sick. I think I should be. The sickness of a juror is like the OBLIGATION OF SEEVIOE 65 Sunday headache, which used to be so commoii in college. The jury system as at present ad- ministered, in many States at least, is little more than a relic of semi-civilized conditions. The juror is too often treated as a criminal, or suspected of an intention to become one. Shut up at night, as if for fear he may become a fugitive from justice, given a compensation scarcely exceeding that which a day laborer re- ceives, listening for days to witnesses who are sometimes stupid and often confusing, annoyed by the wearisome wrangles between attorneys concerning the admission or rejection of testi- mony, I do not wonder that a business man seeks to avoid its burdens, and I hope that the time will come when a juror will be treated as though he were an honest man, denied no more of the comforts of home than the judge him- self, paid that which is an adequate compensa- tion for his time and when the unanimity now required and which prompts to all the strenu- ous effort to guard against undue influences upon one, or to secure the kindly assistance of one — a unanimity which is called for in scarce- 66 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP ly any other tribunal on the face of the earth — shall give way to a system in which the con- currence of a reasonable majority of the jurors shall determine the verdict. So, a witness is often insulted by opposing counsel. He is in- terrogated as though he were presumably a liar, and questions are put to him with insinua- tions and in a manner which every honorable man feels like resenting. But notwithstanding all the disagreeable features which attend ser- vice as a witness or juror it is an obligation resting upon the citizen, and one which as a duty he should not ignore. Let him strive for reformation, but meantime not make himself a delinquent. Again, there is service at the primaries and the polls. No more important duty rests upon the citizen. The great problem of government by the people depends for its wise solution upon the fidelity with which this service is per- formed. I know there are many to whom a primary is a matter of no moment, a campaign nothing better than a circus, an election day only a holiday ; but to him who appreciates the OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 67 value of government by the people, who knows that here, in the first instance, at least, the policy of such government is to be settled, who appreciates the dignity of American citizenship and his personal responsibility for the success- ful outcome of the great problem; to him the primary and the polls are sacred . places, and the service he renders there is as important as any rendered on the battle-field or in the halls of Congress. Unfortunately, too often, the one who is most competent to render efficient service in these directions is the one who neglects it. He does not like the atmosphere of the primary or the surroundings of the polls. Conscious of education and intelligence he is afflicted with a daintiness which leads him to avoid the touch of common people. Then when the outcome does not accord with his views he mourns over the decadence of the American people, and the infelicities of our politics. On^ service more I must mention, and that is service in the payment of taxes. I have yet to meet the man whose heart was filled with 68 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP gratitude at the privilege of paying taxes. While many unhesitatingly pay them and feel that in so doing they are discharging but a common obligation of all, you are not likely to find one overflowing with effusion of joy be- cause he has been permitted to contribute so much money to the government. Every one knows that the pecuniary burdens we call taxes must be borne; the individual must contribute in order that the government may continue, and yet the ordinary tax-payer is willing that his neighbor shall bear this burden. His patriotism in this respect is like that of Arte- mus Ward in the civil war, a willingness to have all his wife's relations drafted. There has always been great difference of opinion as to the things to be taxed and the modes of tax- ation. Out of these differences have arisen some of the political parties of the day, and disputes concerning these questions have been sharp both in legislative and judicial halls. There is a constant effort by many to shift by legislation the burdens of taxation to the shoul- ders of others, and when they fail in that legis- OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 69 lation they pursue many a curious and winding way in efforts to escape those burdens. I have enumerated these various forms in which service is to be rendered by the citizen to the State in order that the scope thereof may be clearly understood. I do not mean that these are all the services which are due from the citizen, but they are enough to present the matter to the mind. As is obvious, these obli- gations of service are not all continuous. They are not pressing upon the citizen at all times, nor do they rest upon all alike. And yet they are services which may be called for, and in respect to them I notice these things : First, whenever due they should be willingly rendered, for every failure impairs to that ex- tent the ability of the nation to do and be for the citizen all that it should do and be. The organization of the political institution which we call the nation is for the purpose of secur- ing the highest weU-being of all the individuals composing it. As declared in the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States, it is or- dained to "establish justice, ensure domestic 70 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our pos- terity." In order that the nation may the most perfectly discharge its duty to the peo- ple, and carry into full effect the purpose for which it was organized it is essential that each citizen and all citizens should render the various services which each and all are called upon to render, whenever they are so called upon; and that they should render them will- ingly. They should lift their eyes above the narrow horizon of their own convenience, their own temporary comfort or annoyance, and see that in the performance of those duties they are simply doing their part in helping the na- tion to its highest usefulness, and securing to it the capacity for the greatest blessings to themselves and their posterity. Again, it should be intelligent service. The workings of that great machine called the gov- ernment are not mechanical. Its various parts are not fastened to a central wheel by pulleys and bolts, wheels and cogs, so that when once OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 71 that central wheel is started all move in unison with mechanical precision. The forces which permeate and move the life of the nation are intellectual and moral. Each one who takes his part in doing any service to the nation must, in order to fuUy discharge his duty, act with all the intelligence he possesses. Science may measure and control the forces which move inert lifeless matter, but science can put no chain or band around those forces which start withia the human soul and which prompt each individual to his activities. In order that the aggregate of the forces which move the na- tion may work out the best it is all important that he who moves any of them, or touches the great springs of its life, shall have a clear un- derstanding of what he is doing and the re- sults of his action, and so become an intelli- gent factor in that life. Very different is the condition of a nation like this from that which obtains in an absolute monarchy where the directing force, the intellectual power, is cen- tred in an individual or a handful while the great mass of the individuals are simply pawns 72 AMEEIOAN CITIZENSHIP moved by the master minds on the national chessboard. Here each man is an active ruler. Upon him rests the responsibility of govern- ment, and out of the commingled thoughts and purposes of all comes the final movement of the nation. Nor is the obligation of intelligent service limited to the higher forms of service and not binding on those who discharge those of less importance. It may require a superior talent, a larger knowledge, to make a great general than a private soldier, but all history attests that the intelligent soldier, the one who discharges the duties of that service thought- fully, is of far more value than one who is stu- pid and ignorant. In battle, as everywhere else, the personal factor becomes of no small moment, and intelligent service there on the part of all is, like intelligent service elsewhere, a help to success. And if intelligent service is called for from any, surely it is from those who have had the benefit of a liberal education. The hod-carrier, the section hand, the street-cleaner, may say that his range of knowledge is limited. He has OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 73 not had the opportunities of others for study, but the college graduate can make no such de- fence. Of all citizens he is the one to whom is given the largest opportunity for acquiring knowledge, and is the last man in the nation who can plead ignorance as an excuse for lack of intelligent service. He, at least in this re- spect, is charged with the highest responsibil- ity. He goes out from college halls an am- bassador from a great court of learning, whose diploma he carries as his credentials. He is received, and rightfully received, as possessed of knowledge and the power which comes there- from. Ignorance is to him an unconscionable plea. The graduate from this university who when called upon to render service writes ig- norance as his excuse for mistake casts a libel on his alma mater. If you have no moral character you may be a scoundrel, but never ask the community to believe that a Yale grad- uate is a fool. Again, it should be unselfish and conscien- tious service. I endeavored to show in my last lecture that high personal character is one of 74 AMEEIOASr CITIZENSHIP the obligations of the citizen, and that it is all- important to the life of the nation. Along the same line of thought, it must be said that un- selfish and conscientious action is one of the important elements in a full discharge of the obligations of service. The thought that it is the prime purpose to get as much out of life and give as little to it as possible is unworthy a manly man, and especially one who has been given great advantages in preparing for life. A citizen should be conscientious in the dis- charge not only of duties of high position but in the discharge of every kind of service called for. We expect a president, a governor, or a judge, to be conscientious. We have an equal right to call upon the humblest citizen to be likewise. He should be conscientious as a juror, conscientious as a road overseer, con- scientious in the discharge of his duties as a voter and in the payment of taxes. That there is not infrequently great lacking in this regard in minor matters is obvious. A friend told me this of the experience of one of the States : It had been the habit in that OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 75 State to leave the listing of personal property to the unsworn statement of the tax-payer. The smallness of the assessment roll attracted attention, and finally an act was passed requir- ing the return by each tax-payer to be verified by his oath. The first year the aggregate re- turn of personal property was doubled, but the year thereafter it diminished a little, and stead- ily from year to year it grew less and less. As the State was one where property changes are slight the only satisfactory explanation was that the first year the conscience of the tax- payer pricked him and he made something like a truthful statement. The next year his eon- science hardened and he was willing to drop a little, and so from year to year the hardening process went on and the assessment roll went down. Does any one at all familiar with our na- tional life doubt that that which is suggested by this illustration finds abundant repetition everywhere ? The frequent justification is that a neighbor does the same, or that there is a common understanding in the community to that effect. 76 AMEEIOAN CITIZENSHIP In another direction is also witnessed a fre- quent disregard of the obligations of conscien- tious service, and that is in judicial proceed- ings. The juror yields his judgment to his prejudices. Especially is this true (and true not merely of jurors but of witnesses) in those actions in which there is an effort by law to restrain the vices of the community. It has sometimes been, perhaps not extravagantly, stated that prohibition laws are the greatest in- centive to perjury that the country affords. Certain it is that offences against those laws are exceedingly difficult of successful prosecution. The memory of witnesses is lamentably weak and the reasonable doubts of jurors are multi- plied and magnified. Both witnesses and ju- rors are parleying with conscience, and their action too often springs from objection to the law rather than from a failure of memory or ignorance of testimony. And here I must notice that which is attract- ing growing attention, to-wit, the so-called commercialism in politics. That it exists, that it is an evil, that it is freighted with peril, no OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 77 intelligent person questions. Possibly the ex- tent to which it exists is exaggerated. It is easy for a beaten party or candidate to charge that defeat is owing to the use of money. These things must also be borne in mind : The real cost of carrying on a political campaign is great; halls are to be hired; speakers are to be employed; brass bands and pyrotechnique dis- plays attend parades and conventions; enor- mous masses of publications are circulated. And these campaigns are carried on in modem military methods, with a general commander, whose various lieutenants and agents take their bidding from the central authority and act as officers of the great political army. In this re- spect campaigns differ from those of fifty years ago, for they were more in the nature of spon- taneous inexpensive movements by separate communities having a common purpose. Now a campaign along these new lines necessarily involves large expenditures, and expenditures which cannot be denounced as corrupt. Whether in all respects this mode of campaign- ing is better than that which existed in days 78 AMEEICAUr CITIZENSHIP gone by may be doubted, but it is far from just to denounce the expenditures made in conse- quence thereof as evidences of corruption. It must also be remembered that the pecuniary interests which are involved are enormous, that money is more abundant, that many interested can easily afford and are willing to contribute, so that large sums pass into the hands of party managers, and with their possession comes the temptation to make a display. And yet, mak- ing all fair allowances for these various mat- ters, no one can doubt that money is becoming a factor, and a hurtful factor, in our politics. Side by side with this is also the fact that, with the change in our capital cities in the styles and modes of living, the cost thereof has be- come greater, salaries of public officials are more inadequate, and there is the ever-pressing temptation to utilize official position in such way that one may go out of politics no worse off at least pecuniarily than when he went in. I have not time to amplify on this subject, to detail the evidences of the existence of this evil, to repeat the stories which are found in the OBLIGATION OP SERVICE 79 daily papers, stories many of which I am glad to believe are but stories, though perhaps too often, like the historical novel, fiction founded upon fact. What I do wish to emphasize is that this evil exists and that it is more of an evil than it was in days gone by. As against this, as well as against all other like evils, I appeal to the American sense of the value and duty of high, conscientious service. Each one must realize that so far as he stands proof against its seductive power, keeping him- self aloof from its contaminating touch, he is doing his part to stay its curse and take the bitterness of the sting from the frequent sneer that in American politics the dollar is more than the man. We must impress upon all the solemn fact that the voting booth is the temple of American institutions. Ko single tribe or family is chosen to watch the sacred fires ever- more burning on its altars, or to tend in its services. Each one of us is a priest. To each is given the care of the ark of the covenant. Each one ministers at its altars. He who min- isters at those altars with hands stained with 80 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP corruption is like one who sitteth at the table of the Lord and eateth and drinketh unworth- ily, and thus eateth and drinketh damnation. Along the street The shadows meet Of Destiny, whose hands conceal The molds of fate That shape the State, And make or mar the common weal. Around I see The powers that be, I stand by Empire's primal springs ; And princes meet In every street. And hear the tread of uncrowned kings ! Not lightly fall Beyond recall The written scrolls a breath can float ; The crowning fact. The kingliest act. Of Freedom is the Freeman's vote I Our hearts grow cold, We lightly hold A right which brave men died to gain ; The stake, the cord, The axe, the sword. Grim nurses at its birth of pain. OBLIGATION OF SEEVIOE 81 The shadow rend, And o'er us bend, O martyrs, with your crowns and palms ; Breathe through these throngs Your battle songs, Your scaffold prayers and dungeon psalms 1 Look from the sky. Like God's great eye, Thou solemn moon, with searching beam, Till in the sight Of thy pure light Our mean self-seekings meaner seem. Shame from our hearts Unworthy arts, The fraud designed, the purpose dark ; And smite away The hands we lay Profanely on the sacred ark. To party claims And private aims Eeveal that august face of Truth, Whereto are given The age of heaven. The beauty of immortal youth. So shall our voice Of sovereign choice Swell the deep bass of duty done. 83 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP And strike the key Of time to be, When God and man shall speak as one ! I do not doubt the outcome. Not do I rest my faith on Matthew Arnold's idea of a saving remnant. The great body of the American people are still keenly alive to a sense of the solemnity of this obligation of service. They do not more than half believe the stories that fill our press. They are a patient, enduring people. They willingly condone offences, be- lieving that the shame which attends will be both punishment to the individual and check against repetition. But if ever convinced that commercialism is controlling our political life they will rise in their wrath and take swiftest and sternest vengeance on all who are in fact or are believed to be tainted with this curse. Finally, let me add, live your life in the full sense of the nobility of the citizen's service. It is, of course, trite to say that every honest ser- vice is noble, to whomsoever and in whatsoever cause rendered; but if we link in our minds the service we render with the cause to which OBLIGATION OF SERVICE 83 it is rendered we may often have a clearer vision of its real nobility. We see not merely that we are rendering willing, intelligent, and conscientious service, and therefore have the peace of mind which comes from the conscious- ness of duty done^ but we become filled with the greatness of that to which the s.ervice is rendered, and whose well-being finds its highest promise in the fidelity of our efforts, and so there comes to us as in no other way a realiza- tion of the nobility of that service. And this sense of nobility extends to every kind of ser- vice the citizen may render, no matter whether it may be what the world calls high or what it may regard as low. The end ennobles the work. Paul had that idea when, in the 12th Chapter of the 1st Corinthians, he illustrated the co-working of all christians to the same end in different services by a comparison of the body with all its members, saying : " But now are they many members, yet but one body. And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee : nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you. Nay, much more those 84 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary. . . . And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honored, all the members rejoice with it." Equally, therefore, may he who is rendering the humblest form of service to this great Eepublic rejoice as being a co- worker with him who is performing the high- est, assured that without fidelity on his part the efforts of others will lose something of their value, and sure that he equallv with them is a part of this nation and a maker of its destiny. In the days of the Caesars "I am a Eoman citizen" was a proud, exultant declaration. It was protection. It was more; it was honor and glory. Twenty centuries of advancing civilization have given to the declaration, "I am an American citizen " a higher and a nobler place. It stands to-day in the forefront of earthly titles. It proclaims a sharing in the greatest opportunities. It is a trumpet-call to the highest fidelity. It is the diploma of the world, the highest which humanity has to bestow. OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE IV OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE The next form of obligation to which I wish to call your attention is that of obedience. It is a necessity of every organized community that there should be laws and .rules to control the actions of individuals. Without them a state of anarchy would exist, each man being a law unto himself, and the diverse purposes and wishes bringing about constant collisions. It is true laws and rules place some restraint on human action, but it does not follow therefrom that they at all interfere with liberty in its truest sense. For liberty does not imply li- cense, absolute freedom of action, but simply the right to do that which one deems best, sub- ject to the limitation that it does not interfere with the equal rights of other members of the community. Of course a Eobinson Crusoe may have absolute freedom, for alone on an 87 88 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP island there is no one having rights to be abridged by anything he may do. And, paren- thetically I may say, if every one who feels that the slight restraints of the law are trespasses upon his liberty would hie away to some lonely island in the South Seas and there luxuriate in the liberty he craves, our benedictions would go with him as well as our prayers that he never return. But when even his man Friday comes to live with Crusoe then his absolute freedom of action must stop on the hither side of Fri- day's rights. And each additional person com- ing to live with or near him, having his own rights may by virtue thereof somewhat restrain Crusoe's action. So it is that the more there are in a community and the more closely they live together, the more numerous are the neces- sary restraints upon the action of each. This necessity of restraint is the source of that mys- terious and illy defined attribute of government which we call the police power, a power which always has a wider field of action in a city than in a village, and in a village than in a farming neighborhood. OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 89 In a government by the people law is the ex- pressed will of the majority. Back of it stands the power of the organized community. That power exists to compel obedience to law, and to many, therefore, law stands simply as the rep- resentation of force; something which must be yielded to, not because there is a pleasure in so doing but because there is a necessity there- for and unfortunate penalties for not yielding. So, to them law is something which always stands in antagonism. The ofificers of the law are their enemies, and they feel a secret pleas- ure whenever they see them baffled in their ef- forts to execute it. It is popular to sneer at and ridicule the policeman, although without him we would be at the mercy of the worst elements. It often happens that the meaning of a law is debatable, is disputed. Within the nation we have tribunals to determine such matters of dispute, but if a tribunal de^des the meaning against our contention, not infrequently then that tribunal becomes itself the object of an- tagonism, and we look upon it as simply an- 90 AMEKICAN CITIZENSHIP other instrumentality by which we are coerced into that which we do not wish and declare that we have become again the victims of mere arbitrary power. I may here note in passing the difference be- tween that law which obtains within a nation, or municipal law as it is called, and interna- tional law, the body of rules which regulate the intercourse of nations. In respect to the lat- ter, there is neither tribunal to determine what is the law, nor organized force to compel obedi- ence. The separate nations construe for them- selves, and, when selfish interests require, abide by their own interpretations, or defiantly re- pudiate the law entirely. The contrast be- tween that condition and that of law within a nation where there is a tribunal to determine the meaning and a power to enforce obedience is obvious. I do not mean to say that there are no cir- cumstances under which disobedience to law may become a duty. Half a century ago there was great discussion in this country upon the question of the "higher law," and that there OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 91 is a higher law I have no doubt. The law of righteousness carries a demand of obedience above any mere human enactment, but never- theless the instances in which the higher law will conflict with the law of the nation are so rare that it does not seem profitable to use much time in discussing them. It certainly ill be- comes one as an excuse for disobedience to create a mere imaginary conflict between municipal and the higher law. Human nature is so consti- tuted that when a law does not suit us we look with great complacency upon the suggestion that it conflicts with some higher law, and that, therefore, we ought to disobey it. Often one fancies that he has grave religious doubts when it is a mere matter of a disordered liver. As Mrs. Bateman, one of the characters in " The Farringdons," says of husbands in general, and hers in particular : " The very best of them don't properly know the difference between their souls and their stomachs; and they fancy that they are a-wrestling with their doubts, when really it is their dinners that are a-wrestling with them. 92 AMEEIOAN CITIZENSHIP Now take Bateman hisself, and a kinder hus- band or a better Methodist never drew breath; yet so sure as he touches a bit of pork, he be- gins to worry hisself about the doctrine of Elec- tion till there's no living with him. . . . He'll sit in the front parlor and engage in prayer for hours at a time, tiU I says to him, * Bateman,' says I, ' I'd be ashamed to go troubling the Lord with a prayer when a pinch o' carbonate of soda would set things straight again.' " One may often wisely solve the doubtful conflict in his mind between duties as did the good Quaker on shipboard when the vessel was attacked by pirates. A man of peace, he would do no fighting, but as he saw a pirate climb- ing up the side of the vessel by a rope, he said to him, " Friend, dost thou wish the rope ? Thou shalt have it," and suiting the action to the word drew his knife, cut the rope and dropped both rope and pirate into the ocean. It must not be supposed that obedience im- plies a mere passive condition — a simple re- fraining from doing things forbidden by stat- OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 93 ute. It is an active virtue. The law com- mands as well as forbids; and obedience re- quires the doing of the act which the law commands as well as the not doing that which it forbids. As I indicated in my last lecture, the nation calls for various kinds of service, and in the truest sense a citizen never fulfils his obligation of obedience unless he renders those services. He may not claim that he has discharged his whole obligation by proof that he has never broken a single clause of the penal code. It is the willing active effort that makes obedience a virtue. Submission is not the whole. That may spring from indifference or cowardice. It indicates no appreciation of the dignities or duties of citizenship. In a certain sense it may be true, as the blind Mil- ton wrote, "they also serve who only stand and wait," but in this eager, aspiring, tumultu- ous day of ours, in this stirring, pushing, pressing life of the Republic, he alone enters fully into the spirit of obedience who throws himself joyfully and earnestly forward in the effort to do all that the nation calls for, and 94 AMBKICAN CITIZENSHIP also to secure like action from others. "The letter killeth but the spirit giveth life." One's own attitude toward the law is one thing. His efforts to bring others into the same attitude another and equally important. He must ever- more lift up the law as something sacred, not to be thrown down and trampled in the dust by any one or any party. So I pass on to say that the duty upon the part of every one to obey the laws of the nation arises because, in the first place, such obedience insures peace and order. If all obeyed, the criminal courts, now so busy, would find their occupation, like Othello's, gone, and a peace would prevail through the community — a peace not like the order which reigned in War- saw, stifling activities and indicating stagna- tion of life, but a peace in which all the activ- ities of all the individuals of the nation would have fullest play. Obedience is a duty because, in the second place, in this government by the people all take part in the enactment of the laws. When many individuals engage in a common enter- OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 95 prise whose particular actions are to be settled by the judgment of the majority, it is the part of honor to abide by the decision of such ma- jority. Surely the path of honor in such a case becomes the path of duty. It is the essence of government by the people that the will of the majority should control, and no man should put himself in a position of defiance to that will simply because he does not concur in the views of the majority. But, it may be said, that ofttimes laws are unjust, unwise, and op- erate harshly on individuals. Doubtless that is true, but General Grant never said a wiser thing than when he declared that the best way to treat a bad law was to enforce it strictly, for then its odious features would soon arrest at- tention, and the considerate judgment of the majority would repeal it. It has been said that popular government was doomed to failure because of the bitterness growing out of election contests; that human nature is such that the result of the struggles at the polls will not always be acquiesced in by the defeated party, and that an appeal to arms 96 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP may be expected from those there beaten, and that when once such an appeal is successful repetitions will follow, until, dismayed and harassed thereby, the community gladly takes refuge in a strong central government with a continuous executive. All social and business interests will prefer even " a man on horse- back " to anarchy and confusion. It is not to be gainsaid that the experience of many so- called republican governments furnish support to this contention. Eevolutions follow one an- other in some of our South American States with almost the frequency of elections, and with far greater regularity than earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. A friend of mine, re- turning the other day from one of those States, told me that while there he spoke to some gen- tlemen about the frequency of revolutions, and received the reply, that unlike their northern neighbors they had neither tennis, nor cricket, nor golf to amuse themselves with, and must have revolutions for their fun. We have had in our history one terrible les- son, a lesson which will not soon be forgotten, OBLIGATION OP OBEDIENCE 97 and which, in addition to other matters, was a declaration as forceful as could have been made that this people will fight to the last before they will permit to enter into our polit- ical life the idea that any body of men or party can appeal from the ballot-box to the musket. It was a terrible lesson, but perhaps a neces- sary one, and now obedience, at least in respect to the action of parties and sections, to the supreme law of the land, is something which, so far as human foresight can determine, is in this nation to stay. We have since had election contests fuU of bitterness, contests in which the defeated party felt that it had been fraud- ulently deprived of a victory to which it was entitled by the popular vote. But while for a time passions raged with utmost violence, the one great lesson of the past was heeded, and rather than enter upon the bitter experience of revolution the defeated party, although smart- ing under the conviction that the fruits of victory had been stolen from it, was content to wait for a new election. To say that the acceptance of the results of an election is a 98 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP duty resting upon all is simply another way of aflBrming the duty of obedience to the laws and the government. One of the imposing spectacles of our national life is the vision of the cheerfulness with which the great body of our people generally accept the result of an election. As Senator Daniels said, in his ad- dress at the Capital Centennial the other day, " the political clocks of both parties strike the same hours; after election." While I do not look for trouble in the way of attempted revolution, there is a form of dis- obedience to constituted authority which is be- coming unfortunately too prevalent and which is freighted with danger. I refer to those dis- turbances which attend what are commonly known as strikes. As I have heretofore pointed out, obedience in the truest sense of the term is an active virtue. It calls not alone for personal conduct, but also for active effort to make obedience the universal rule. Industrial combination is a fact of to-day ; large manufacturing and trans- portation enterprises on the one hand, with OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 99 great bodies of employees on the other. Com- bination and organization exist on both sides. Our constitutional guarantee of equality gives to either party the right to terminate the rela- tion of employer and employe. It is true that if such termination involves a breach of eon- tract an action for damages will lie, which may be something of value against the employer and not much against the employee. But the termination of that relation, whether involving breach of contract or not, carries with it no right of coercion. No matter what injury to the employer, or disturbance of his interests, or inconvenience to the public the summary stopping of work by the employees singly or in mass may produce, the law does not attempt to compel them to work. An equality of right is possessed by the employer. He may termi- nate the relation of employer and employee, and the law will not compel him to reinstate it. If there be a breach of contract he may suffer in an action of damages, but the law does not forcibly re-establish the relation. As the employees may act in a body, so the em- 100 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP ployers may act, and so may they treat them as a body. I am dealing now with the legal rights of the two parties. I take no notice of condi- tions which may exist if compulsory arbitra- tion ever becomes a feature of our law. There may then possibly be coercion. Neither do I stop to take notice of that pressure which comes from public sentiment and which often and justly influences one or both parties to seek to re-establish the relation; nor even of those ethical principles which ought to influ- ence us all, and which doubtless in the days to come may be more and more incorporated into positive law. I am dealing, as I said, simply with present legal relations, and the obligations of obedience to the laws which go hand in hand with those relations. While many of these strikes are settled peacefully, yet it is a sad fact in respect to not a few that they are attended by violence, colli- sion, destruction of property, and sometimes of life. It may be true that in many instances the violence and destruction are not the work of the strikers themselves, but of mere sympa- OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 101 thizers, or even of the mob of the idle and vicious who are sure to congregate where there is a prospect of trouble. But he who calls a mob into being cannot be pronounced wholly guiltless of that which the mob may do. It is not my purpose to inquire which in any given case is primarily the most responsible, the employer or the employee. What I wish to emphasize is that these collisions involve a matter of disobedience. It is one thing to exercise a right which the law gives, and in the exercise of that right an individual or a combination is entitled to the fullest protec- tion; but it is an entirely different thing for one party to endeavor to prevent another from exercising an equal right under the law. It makes little difference whether the attempted coercion is by force or intimidation. In either case it is an effort not to change but to break the law. In either it is a matter of disobedi- ence in the truest sense of the term. It may be wise that all who are engaged in pursu- ing the same avocation should be organized into one body, but whether they should be so 103 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP organized or not depends, as the law now stands, solely on voluntary action, and to at- tempt to deny a laborer his right to work, whether he be within or without an organiza- tion, or to deprive him of full protection in that work, implies a plain disregard of the mandates of the law. If it be, as a matter of political economy, wise that there should be a consolidation of all employees into one or more organizations, and that no one should be per- mitted to work except he be a member of such organizations, let the law makers so enact, and whenever a constitutional enactment to that effect is passed, then every good citizen should strive to enforce it. But until such enactment there is no justifiable excuse for attempting by any form of coercion or intimidation to de- prive one of his liberty in respect to labor, a liberty included within what our fathers de- clared to be inalienable rights, "Ufe, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Another matter which illustrates both the spirit and result of disobedience, and which is a blot on our national life, is the frequency of OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 103 lynch law. It used to be said that it was an experience of the frontier, in communities which had not become fully organized and where the forces of the law were not yet in suc- cessful operation. But now it may almost be re- garded as a habit of the American people. Scarcely a day passes that the people of some community have not, as it is said, taken the law into their own hands. The time was when these acts were so rare, and coming only under conditions of terrible excitement and atrocious crime, that they startled us. They were called thunder-storms, and it was claimed in their justification that like thunder-storms they cleared the air. But now they are so common that we pay little attention to them, and look upon them as almost a matter of course. It is a convenient, inexpensive, and expeditious way of putting some worthless scoundrel out of the world, and the fact that there is an occasional mistake as to the real criminal seems to operate in no way to deter from similar actions and on slight provocation. Far be it from me to say that there is not in 104 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP the administration of the law that which may be stated by way of palliation. It seems some- times as though legislation was conceived in the spirit of obstruction to the punishment of criminals and of indefinite postponement thereof by appeal, writ of error, and habeas corpus. Appellate courts have a wonderfully quick eye for detecting fine technical errors in criminal proceedings, and back of all stands a tender-hearted Executive responding to the ap- peals of relatives and friends of the criminal. It is not therefore altogether wonderful that an indignant community will take no chances but summarily inflicts the punishment the ac- cused deserves. But we must rise to a higher plane or the peace and order as well as the good name of society will suffer sad shatter. We shall rise to such higher plane only when the moral sense of the community is aroused to the enormity of such transactions. It is useless to scold legislators or lawyers or judges or executives. They will never be any better than the popular sentiment which is back of them. When that public sentiment is aroused OBLIGATION OF OBEDIENCE 105 SO as to feel that the safety of the commuiiity demands prompt, stern, imfaltering prosecu- tion of criminals, then it wiU be that legisla- tion will cease to block but will strive to facili- tate; errors will be less obvious; executives will be firmer; justice will be done; criminals will be punished, and lynch law wiU be forgotten. Disobedience to the law will in this respect be simply a matter of history. I might go on pointing out other forms of disobedience, and noting the varied results which flow therefrom, but perhaps these are enough. And the conclusion which I wish to draw is the duty and necessity of full, hearty obedience to the letter and spirit of all our laws. Do I lay too much stress on this ? Am I failing to note the many imperfections which attend our laws and the administration thereof? By no means. On the contrary, I fully appreciate the incongruities, the defects, the imperfections. But there is no danger that obedience will tend to perpetuate these defects and imperfections; that the masses continually yielding to things as they are will become so 106 AMEEICANT CITIZENSHIP used to them as neither to seek nor desire im- provement. On the contrary, the very spirit of the age is against contentment and acquies- cence. It challenges everything. It is volcanic and iconoclastic, and there is more likelihood of overthrow and revolution. We are in a hurry. We cannot wait the slow processes of growth and time. Given an evil, a defect, and we must strike it down, even if with it go many things of value. Kapid changes are the order of the day, and there is far more danger from the rapidity of those changes than from any supine acquiescence in things as they are. The obedience of the American is not cowardly. It is not from selfishness. It springs from a con- viction that it is duty. And he sees as the reward of duty done the promise of a better day for himself and his dear ones, and the sweet assurance that the nation, of which he is a citizen, in whose past he glories, and in whose future he hopes, wiU thereby be made stronger and better fitted for the full achieve- ment of its glorious mission in the world. THE DUTY OF STBIVING TO BETTER THE LH^ OF THE NATION THE DUTY OF STRIVING TO BETTER THE LIFE OF THE NATION The last matter which I wish to notice is one that looks forward: The duty of striving for the bettering of the life of the nation. The famous Scotch preacher. Dr. Guthrie, kept over his desk these words declaratory of his purposes in life: For the cause that needs asBistance, For the wrong that needs resistance, For the future in the distance, And the good that I may do. To every citizen comes the nation's call in this direction. By as much as he appreciates all that the nation is to him, its protection, its helpfulness, its blessing; by as much as he re- alizes that his own possibilities of accomplish- ment are widened and strengthened, and that life will be made richer to his children and his 109 110 AMEBIC AN CITIZENSHIP children's children by its continued growth in all the higher elements of national being; by so much should he listen and respond to its loud call to so order his life and work that all shall tend to the bettering of its life. Too many seem to feel that their duty to the nation is a qualified and limited one; that a negative obligation is all really resting upon them; that so long as they do not hurt the national life they are called upon for nothing more. Whatever they may do in the develop- ment of personal character, or in the discharge of social and political duties, is done without any appreciation of its efEect upon the national life. It is enough for them, so far as the Eepublic is concerned, that they do not disobey its laws ; that when called upon they render the personal services demanded, and that their characters and the habits and conduct spring- ing therefrom are such as to keep them out of the police court. To them patriotism as an active virtue means nothing except in time of war, and not too much then. In peace a mere sluggish acquiescence in what is being done BETTEE LIFE OF THE NATION 111 suflfices. It never enters into their contempla- tion that the growing well-being of the country depends at all upon their personal efforts. In an easy way they turn over to others the full responsibility for the future. They know noth- ing of that magnificent thing called public spirit. They are content to take what comes, and doing nothing very discreditable are wont to believe that they are numbered among the good citizens. Like the servant mentioned in the parable they take the talent given them and, burying it in the earth, have no thought of returning it with interest. As against this negative view of duty I want to appeal for positive affirmative vigorous ac- tion. The poet says: We are living, we are dwelling. In a grand and awful time ; In an age on ages telling ; To be living is sublime. The thought thus expressed I wish to em- phasize, and emphasize it in relation to the duties of every one of its citizens to the great Eepublic. I want to appeal to the moral ele- 113 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP ment in the nature of every student in this great university. I want to lift the obligations of citizenship above the mere question of mathematics, the duty of giving only up to the amount of receiving. I want as best I can to impress upon you that in your obligations to this nation the debtor side always carries a plus. Whatever of comfort, of prestige, of success, of glory, may attend your work for the nation, and whatever else may pass to the credit side of your account, the debtor side is always charged with a larger sum. And I add that the greater the credit side proportionately increased is the excess of the debit side. If in your experiences of life by the considerate judgment of your fellows, or the opportunities of business, you are lifted into positions of power and usefulness, the very fact that your credit side is enlarged above that of the ordi- nary citizen carries with it notice that the debtor side has increased even more rapidly. If this nation in its development had reached a state of perfection, or one near it, you might well say that the obligations resting BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 113 upon you were limited to the duty of helping to preserve that which had been accomplished; but unfortunately whatever we may say about the greatness and glory of our nation, how- ever much we may boast of what it has achieved, we all know that when we place its present life over against a perfect life there is an unfortunate failure. National ideals are not yet with us national facts. We see a glory to be accomplished but not yet realized. We are conscious of shortcomings, defects, delin- quencies, which we hope will some day disap- pear. As each individual has his ideals, which unfortunately he never realizes, so each one of us looks upon the nation and sees that with aU it has done and accomplished there is stiU a vast field of achievement. Notwithstanding all the boastings we make of the grand history and the glorious life of this Eepublic, no thoughtful man doubts the magnitude of the work before us. There runs through the present life of the nation a multi- tude of imperfections and shadows. The na- tional life is not perfect. Society as it exists 114 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP to-day has many dark places. We are still far from the Millennial day. I may not notice all, and yet these stand out in bold relief : There is undoubtedly corruption in political life — ^per- haps not all that some despondent persons as- sert, but still there is a commercialism in poli- tics which no thoughtful man can be ignorant of. The equal voice of the voters is not yet secured, and that irrespective of the matter of intimidation. A great many do not cast their votes in accordance with their independent honest judgment. Influences more or less cor- rupt are potent. Notwithstanding aU our edu- cational privileges, our common schools, and the great work they are doing (and I have not the slightest desire to minimize the extent of their work) there is a fearful volume of igno- rance. More than that,, there is in our popu- lation a heterogeneous mass. We are not all Anglo-Saxon. We do not all spring from those races which have true ideas of self-govern- ment. We have a great multitude coming from those nations in which government is a sup- posed enemy, a multitude which has no idea BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 115 of the meaning of liberty restrained by law. It has yet to be Americanized, to be brought into a realization of the limitations upon per- sonal action which come from the highest ob- ligations of liberty. More than that, we have, notwithstanding our enormous resources and great territory, a large population who know nothing of the blessing of a home, and the pure surroundings which attach thereto. Surely in this meagre picture of the life and needs of the nation there is an appeal to every kingly soul. In feudal times it was the boast of the knight that no appeal from the weaker sex went unheeded. Those times have been called, and not improperly, the age of chivalry. I want to revive something of the spirit of that age, in the knightly devotion of each of our citizens to the Republic. The story of Richard Cceur de Lion will to the end of time move every soul, and it is well that it does so. Ideals of heroism, persistence, and devotion should ever be held before the eyes of the young, and not be put one side as no part of the practical life of to-day. On the contrary, there never 116 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP has been a time in the history of the world when ideals towering above the mere struggle for pecuniary personal reward were of more importance. Men take the pure ideals of their souls And look them fast away, And never dream that things so beautiful Are fit for every day I So counterfeits pass current in their lives. And stones they use for bread, And starvingly and fearfully they walk Through life among the dead, Though never yet was pure ideal Too fair for them to make their Heal. The thoughts of beauty dawning on the soul Are glorious heaven-gleams, And God's eternal truth lies folded deep In all man's lofty dreams ; In thoughts still world, some brother-tie which bound The Planets, Kepler saw. And through long years he searched the spheres, and there He found the answering law. Men said he sought a wild ideal. The stars made answer, " it is Real 1 " BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 117 Aye, Daniel, Howard, all the crowned ones That, star-like, gleam through time, Lived boldly out before the clear-eyed sun. Their inmost thoughts sublime 1 Those truths, to them more beautiful than day, They knew would quicken men ; And deeds befitting the millennial truths They dared to practise then. Till they who mocked the young ideal In meekness owned it was the Real. Thine early dreams, which came Uke ' ' shapes of light," Came bearing Prophesy ; And nature's tongues, from leaves to '"quiring stars," Teach loving faith to Thee ; Fear not to build thine ejrrie in the heights Where golden splendors play ; And trust thyself unto thine inmost soul In simple faith alway ; And God will make divinely Real The highest forms of thine Ideal. In the presence of these ideals the question comes to every young man, what is your pur- pose in life ? Do you look forward to it in the hope of honor, wealth or pleasure, or are you stirred through and through with the thought 118 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP that life means to you possibilities of useful- ness and service ? Are you ambitious ? I hope so, notwithstanding Cardinal Wolsey's words to his protege, " Cromwell, I charge thee fling away ambition. By that sin fell the angels." I agree that ambition which is purely personal, whose boundaries are self and pleasure, is something calling for no laudation or approval. But an ambition not so circumscribed, but which has the idea of usefulness — ^and it may be of a name connected with that usefulness — an ambition which looks to achievement for others, is one worthy of all commendation. It is one which stirs the individual to loftiest deeds and noblest living. I have little respect for one who has no ideals in life; for one who measures the whole purpose and scope of his existence by the loaf and the dollar. Such a one may have all the negative qualifications of a citizen. He may never antagonize the course of things prescribed by the law. He may never fail in obedience to the letter of the statute or in response to any demand for personal service, and yet he may go through life possessed of a BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 119 character which, though destitute of positive, vices, is equally wanting in positive virtues. He stands a type of those mentioned in the Eevelations as members of the Church of Laodicea : " Thou art neither cold nor hot. I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm and neither cold nor hot I will spew thee out of my mouth." Among the ideals filling the aspiring soul of every citizen of these United States should be the ideal nation. Neither himself nor his fam- ily, his friends, the community in which he lives, nor even the single State of which he is primarily a citizen should fill the measure of his thoughts and labors — ^but the great Eepub- lic, of which both himself and his family, friends, community and State are but parts, should ever rise like Mont Blanc among the Alps, the supreme object of devotion and toil. I do not mean that every one should look forward with the purpose or expectation of being a statesman and holding office, of becom- ing a politician of the respectable kind, or even the favored recipient of a newspaper para- 120 AMERICAN CITIZEITSHIP graph. But I do mean that one clear purpose of every life should be to help in making the nation better. It should be a distinct object in life; something which the individual aims to accomplish, and not something which may come as a mere incident to other efforts and purposes. We must live with the idea that we have a solemn duty to this Eepublic; that we are its large debtors, and that the only limit to our obligation is our capacity to help in lift- ing its life to a higher and nobler plane. To carry such a purpose into effect we must have both courage and candor. The question which each must ask is not, how can I become most popular, but how can I do the most good ? We often hear the sentiment: our country, right or wrong. A higher thought is: our country, let us make it always right. Times may come in which we have to stand by our country, even though we do not fully agree with what it is doing. In case of a war, and one even which our judgment does not ap- prove, we cannot ally ourselves vdth the enemy. We cannot afford to be traitors. We may be BETTER LIFE OF THE NATI02Sr 121 compelled to serve as its soldiers and help it in its effort to victory. And yet we can always be numbered among those who demand that the nation shall only engage in righteous war; that no matter of hate or revenge, no thought of territorial acquisition or eagerness to display our power before the world shall ever lead us into a bloody conflict with our neighbors. We can also ever demand that the end of every war shall be a righteous and just peace. This na- tion must not appear before the world as a highwayman. Stand and deliver must never be the motto of the Eepublic. Victory must be seasoned with justice. If the purpose of the war be accomplished, the end should promptly and rightfully come; and the greater our power, the greater our victory, the higher is our obli- gation to do justice. Noblesse oblige is a rule for nations as for individuals. And that na- tion as that individual stands highest in the world's thought, becomes most potent for good, which in the hour of triumph manifests the most consideration and magnanimity. I know that we are sometimes hampered by 12-2 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP I party organizations. A fundamental fact, a necessity in the life of a government by the people is organization into parties of those who agree upon certain lines of conduct. As indi- vidual members of a party we cannot dictate its policy in all things. It may be duty to choose between two parties, each of which does some things which do not accord with our judgment. It may be a choice between two evils; and this sometimes where matters of gravest importance are involved. A notable instance is found in the recent campaign. Ee- publicans, like Senator Hoar, though strongly opposed to the attitude of the present Eepub- lican Administration in respect to the Philip- pine Islands, earnestly supported its continu- ance in power because they believed greater evils would result from the success of Mr. Bryan. Others, like Governor Boutwell, pur- sued an opposite course. No one can doubt the sincerity, the patriotism, the devotion to duty of either. They agreed on one thing. They differed as to the remedy. So will it often be with the most conscientious men. BETTER LIFE OP THE NATION 123 Lecky, the historian, speaking of a similar situation in the English Parliament, says: " Every one who is actively engaged in poli- tics — every one especially who is a member of the House of Commons — ^must soon learn that if the absolute independence of individual judgment were pushed to its extreme, political anarchy would ensue. The complete concur- rence of a large number of independent judg- ments in a complicated measure is impossible. If party government is to be carried on, there must be, both in the Cabinet and in Parlia- ment, perpetual compromise. The first condi- tion of its success is that the Government should have a stable, permanent, disciplined support behind it, and in order that this should be obtained the individual member must, in most cases, vote with his party. Sometimes he must support a measure which he knows to be bad, because its rejection would involve a change of government which he believes would be a still greater evil than its acceptance, and in order to prevent this evil he may have to 134 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP vote a direct negative to some resolution con- taining a statement which he believes to be true. At the same time, if he is an honest man, he will not be a mere slave of party. Some- times a question arises which he considers so supremely important that he will break away from his party and endeavor at all hazards to carry or to defeat it." As Lecky suggests in this last sentence, there are times when one must rightfully break away from party, and either join the opposition or aid in the formation of a third party. This, although inconsiderable in numbers, may be a protest challenging attention and resulting in great good. Ordinarily it is better to work within a party than against it, though there are exceptions to the rule. For years the Abolition- ists were an insignificant handful, and yet their separate action was a constant protest, which prevented the question of slavery from being ignored, and which in the end led to its over- throw. Like John the Baptist, they were ridi- culed, condemned, pictured as clothed with BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 125 camel's hair and a girdle about the waist, but, like John the Baptist, they were a voice in the wilderness. It may well be doubted whether the same result would have followed had they retained their relations to either of the great parties of the day. So to-day the Prohibition party is a constant protest. We may think its policy unwise ; that its action tends more to continue than to over- throw the liquor traffic. Whatever we may think of the effect of its action in temporary results, the beautiful motto which Frances Willard bequeathed as her legacy to the world, " For God and home and native land," is like the voice of the Baptist, "repent ye; repent ye; for the kingdom of heaven is at hand"; and that party's protest and unpractical action may yet prove the forerunner of a new dispen- sation. The constant effort of the individual to cre- ate a higher thought in the nation will surely find large results in its life. The new century finds us face to face with new conditions. We are, whether wisely or unwisely, placed in eon- 126 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP tact with and given control over large bodies of comparatively uncivilized peoples. Shall we repeat our dealings with the Indians of North America, and have at the end of this hundred years a second edition of "A Century of Dis- honor/' or shall justice, honesty, and righteous- ness illumine all our association with them, and thus they be led willingly, joyfully, into the glorious life of a better civilization? The commercial activity of this nation is in- creasing with wonderful rapidity. No lover of his coimtry cares to stay that activity. Rather let it go on, and in its peaceful flow bring us into intimate relations with all nations, and in that growing intercourse give increased de- mand and greater remuneration for our prod- ucts, industry, and inventive skill. It is pleas- ing to notice, and that too even in the pro- ceedings of Congress, the indications of a growing feeling that there shall be a moral ele- ment in such commercial activity, and that the best development of our commercial supremacy excludes from its scope opium and rum. Com- merce, to bless us, must bless the nations and the peoples with whom we deal. BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 137 Nineteen centuries ago there broke upon the startled ears of Judea's shepherds watching their flocks beside the village of Bethlehem the only angel's song ever heard by the children of earth : It came upon the midnight clear, That glorious song of old, From angels bending near the earth To touch their harps of gold : " Peace on the earth, good-will to men From heaven's all gracious king." Though nineteen centuries have passed away, still the war-song is sung, the war-drums speak, and the prophetic day seems far o£E in the future. But the day will come, and all hail to the nation and the men who strive to bring it nearer. While our national life has not been clear it may truthfully be said to its glory that this Eepublic has been among the foremost na- tions to speak for peace and to plead for meli- oration of the hardships of war so long as war * shall last. One of the first treaties we made (the Jay treaty of '94 with England) stipu- lated for protection to individuals in case of war, and from that time on in our treaties and 138 AMEEICAN CITIZENSHIP negotiations with other nations we have con- stantly striven to at least soften its hardships. We have entered into more arbitration arrange- ments than any other nation. We have sought to introduce arbitration into the life of the world. We stood shoulder to shoulder with Great Britain in the recent Peace Conference at the Hague, the most urgent for those stipu- lations which tend to prevent the recurrence of war. It is and must be the dream of the future that this nation, baptized from its infancy into the gospel of the Prince of Peace, should take the lead in all efforts in that direction. It is the solemn call to every citizen, and espe- cially to the young, who must soon bear the burdens of national life, to do that which lies within their power to make peace, first, the law of this nation, and, second, the law of the world. There never was a time when public opinion was more potent. And if the accumu- lating voice of public opinion within this Ee- public shall proclaim its adherence to the prin- ciples of peace, other nations will heed and follow. And the time will come — BETTER LIFE OF THE NATION 139 " When the whole ■world gives back the song Which now the angels sing. " Young gentlemen, you are the sons of Yale. Doubtless, the handful of ministers who placed a few books on a table to signify the beginning of a college, did not foresee how during the two succeeding centuries their venture would grow into this grand university. But they laid the foundations in the belief that during all its years it would be true to the purposes of use- fulness for which it was founded, and would fit the young for public employment in church and civil state. And in her long history Yale has never proved false to those purposes. Out from these halls have gone a mighty multitude who, scattered through the length and breadth of the land, have done noble service in uplift- ing the life of both church and state. In all departments of public service her sons have been found, and before their eyes have glowed the bright ideals of a better life in the nation. Ever have they striven to take the great nation- al heritage they received from their fathers, and pass it on to their children a nobler heri- 130 AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP tage, blessed and beautified by their toils and fidelity. Their blood has crimsoned many a field of battle, as they died for liberty and union. In the councils of the nation they have spoken words which have been strong for truth and righteousness. They have sat in the judi- cial tribunals, and their judgments have looked forward, as they strove to make plain the ways of the law. In all departments of industrial and commercial activity they have been num- bered among the leaders. In school and college and university they have passed on to countless multitudes the learning and wisdom gathered in this great home of knowledge. From the pulpit they have spoken words of comfort and hope, and striven in ten thousand ways to make life sweeter because purer. In the shadow of the achievements of these who have gone before you, in the presence of all the precious memories of the past, you, young gentlemen, stand to-day facing the great pos- sibilities of life in the new century. Will you be recreant to the past of old Yale, or will you stand in the future firm for all those things BETTER LIFE OP THE NATION 131 which make for the better life of the nation? Will you go on in your various walks in life ever pleading for the higher things, strong for truth, justice, purity and righteousness, and rejoicing evermore in the sweet thought that — Grand and hale are the elms of Yale, Like Angels bending o'er you.