THE LIFE OF THE REV. JOHN WESLEY, A.M., SOMETIME FELLOW OF LINCOLN COLLEGE, OXFORD, AND FOUNDER OF THE METHODIST SOCIETIES. BY RICHARD WATSON. 'Ev kSttois ssepiaaotipvs. [in labours more abundantly.] FIRST AMERICAN OFFICIAL EDITION, WITH TRANSLATIONS AND NOTES BY JOHN EMORY. NEWYORK, PUBLISHED BY J. EMORY AND B. WAOGH, FOR THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, AT THE CONFERENCE OFFICE, 14 CROSBY-STREET. J. Collord, Printer. 1831. "Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year J831, by J. Emory and B. Waugh, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New-York." CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Mr. Wesley's Parentage—Mrs. Susanna Wesley—Samuel Wesley, jun.—Mr. Wesley at School and College—Religious Impressions and Inquiries—Ordination—College Honours—Charles Wesley's early Life—Methodists at Oxford—Origin of th'e name Method¬ ist Pages 7-17 CHAPTER II. The Wesleys at Oxford—Their Efforts to do good—Opposition— Correspondence with Mr. Wesley, sen.—Mr. Samuel Wesley, and Mrs. Wesley—Mr. John Wesley refuses to settle at Epworth— Remarks—Death of Mr. Wesley, sen.—The Wesleys engage to go out to Georgia—Letter of Mr. Gambold 17-34 CHAPTER III. fhe Wesleys on their Voyage—Intercourse with the Moravians— Conduct, Troubles, and Sufferings in Georgia—Affair of Miss Hopkey—Mr. Wesley returns to England 34-46 CHAPTER IV Mr. Wesley's Review of his religious.Experienoe—Trouble of Mind— Interview with Peter Bohler—Receives the Doctrine of Justification by Faith—Preaches it—Mr. Charles Wesley's religious Experience —Remarks 46-59 CHAPTER V. State of Religion in the Nation—Mr. Wesley's Visit to Germany— Return to England—His Labours in London—Meets with Mr. Whitefield—Dr. Woodward's Societies—Mr. Charles Wesley's Labours—Field Preaching—Remarks 59-72 CHAPTER VI. Effect of the Labours of the Messrs. Wesley and Mr. Whitefield at Kingswood—Mr. Wesley at Bath—Statement of his doctrinal Views—Separates from the Moravians in London—Formation of the Methodist Society—Mr. Wesley's Mother—Correspondence between Mr. John and Mr. Samuel Wesley on extraordinary Emo¬ tions, and the Doctrine of Assurance—Remarks—Enthusiasm— Divine Influence—Difference between Mr. Wesley and Mr. White- field— Their Reconciliation—Mr. Maxfield—Mr. Wesley's De¬ fence of his calling out Preachers to assist him in his Work— Remarks 72-95 CHAPTER VII. Persecution in London—Institution of Classes—Mr. Wesley charged with being a Papist—His Labours in Yorkshire, Northumberland, agpd Lincolnshire—Death of Mrs. Susanna Wesley—Labours and 4 CONTENTS. Persecutions of Mr. Charles Wesley in Staffordshire and York¬ shire—Increase of the Societies—Mr. Wesley's Danger and Escape at Wednesbury—His first Visit to Cornwall—Riots in Stafford¬ shire—Preaches for the last time before the University of Oxford— Correspondence with the Rev. J. Erskine—His Sermon on "A Catholic Spirit"—First Conference held- Remarks.. Pages 95-116 CHAPTER VIII. Mr. Charles Wesley's Labours in Cornwall, Kent, Staffordshire, and the North of England—Persecution at Devizes—Remarks—Mr. Wesley at Newcastle—His Statement of the Case between the Clergy and the Methodists—Remarks—Labours in Lincolnshire, &c.—Persecutions in Cornwall—Count Zinzendorf—Dr. Doddridge —Mr. Wesley a Writer of-Tracts—His Sentiments on Church Go¬ vernment—Extracts from the Minutes of the early Conferences— Remarks—Mr. Wesley's Labours in different parts of the King¬ dom—His zeal to diffuse useful Knowledge—Mobs in Devonshire —Visits Ireland—Succeeded there by his Brother—Persecutions in Dublin 116-166 CHAPTER IX. Labours of the Preachers—Doctrinal Conversations of the Confer¬ ences—Justification—Repentance—Faith—Assurance—Remarks —Fruits of justifying Faith—Sanctification—Witness of the Spirit —Remarks—Spirit in which Mr. Wesley sought Truth—Miscel¬ laneous Extracts from the Minutes of the early Conferences—No¬ tices of the Deaths of Preachers—Remarks 167-181 CHAPTER X. Early List of fJirouits—Mr. Charles Wesley in London—Earthquake there—Differences between Mr. Charles Wesley and the Preach¬ ers—Remarks—Respective Views of the Brothers—Mr. Wesley's Marriage—Mr. Perronet—Kings wood School — Remarks—Mr. Wesley visits Scotland—Letters—Sickness—Mr. Whitefield's Let¬ ter to him in Anticipation of his Death—Mr. Wesley's Remarks on Books—His Address to the Clergy—Remarks—Hervey's Let¬ ters 181-200 CHAPTER XI. Methodism in America—Revivals of Religion—Remarks—Mr. Wes¬ ley's Labours—Notices of Books from his Journals—Minutes of the Conference of 1770—Remarks—Mr. Shirley's Circular—Mr. Wes¬ ley's " Declaration"—Controversy respecting the Minutes—Re¬ marks—Increase of the Societies—Projects for the Management of the Connection after Mr. Wesley's Death 200-228 CHAPTER XII. Mr. Wesley's Sickness in Ireland—Letter to the Commissioners of Excise—Visit to the Isle of Man—Opening of City Road Chapel— "Arminian Magazine"—Disputes in the Society at Bath—Mr. Wesley's Letter to a Nobleman—His Visit to Holland—"Deed of Declaration"—Remarks 228-242 CONTENTS. 5 CHAPTER XIII. State of the Societies in America—Ordination of Superintendents and Elders for the American Societies—Remarks—Dr. Coke—Mr. Asbury—Mr. Charles Wesley's Remonstrances—Ordinations "for Scotland—Remarks—Mr. Wesley's second Visit to Holland—His Labours in England, Ireland, and the Norman Isles—Return to London—Remarks—Extract from a Sermon by Bishop Copleston .—Mr. Wesley's Reflections on the progress of the Work, and on entering his eighty-fifth Year Pages 242-272 CHAPTER XTV. Death of Mr. Charles Wesley—His Character—His Hymns—Re¬ marks—Mr. Montgomery's "Psalmist"—Anecdote of the Rev. Samuel Wesley, sen.—Mr. Wesley's continued Labours—Reflec¬ tions on entering his eighty-eighth Year—Last Sickness—Death— Funeral—Epitaph—Sketches of his Character by different Wri¬ ters 273-306 CHAPTER XV. Mr. Wesley and the Church—Modern Methodism and the Church— Charges refuted—Mr. Wesley's Writings—Extent of the Methodist Societies at his death, and at the present time—Conclusion 306-323 1* ADVERTISEMENT. Various Lives or Memoirs of the Founder of Methodism have already been laid before the public. But it has been frequently remarked that such of these as contain the most approved accounts of Mr. "Wesley have been carried out to a length which obstructs their circulation, by the intermixture of details comparatively unin¬ teresting beyond the immediate circle of Wesleyan Methodism. The present Life, therefore, without any design to supersede larger publi¬ cations, has been prepared with more special reference to general readers. But, as it is contracted within moderate limits chiefly by the exclusion of extraneous matter, it will, it is hoped, be found sufficiently comprehensive to give the reader an adequate view of the life, labours and opinions of the eminent individual who is its subject; and to afford the means of correcting the most material errors and misrepresentations which have had currency respecting him. On several points the Author has had the advantage of consulting unpub¬ lished papers, not known to preceding biographers, and which have enabled him to place some particulars in a more satisfactory light. London, May 10, 1831. ADVERTISEMENT TO THIS EDITION. In this edition, translations are given of sueh passages in the dead languages as are left untranslated in the London edition. It is en¬ larged, too, and we hope enriched, by a variety of notes, on points of peculiar importance in an American edition. The price, nevertheless, is so extremely low as to be justified solely by the confident antici¬ pation of very extensive sales. The profits, if any, (as of all other publications from the Methodist Episcopal Press,) will be scrupulously applied to the spread of the Gospel, and to strictly charitable objects. THE LIFE THE REV. JOHN WESLEY, A. M. CHAPTER I. John and Charles Wesley, the chief founders of that religious body now commonly known by the name of the Wesleyan Methodists, were the sons of the Rev. Samuel Wesley, rector of Epworth, in Lincolnshire. Of this clergyman, and his wife Mrs. Susanna Wesley, who was the daughter of the Rev. Dr. Annesley, as well as of the ancestors of both, an interesting account will be found in Dr. Adam Clarke's " Memoirs of the Wesley Family," and in the "Life of Mr." John Wesley" by Dr. Whitehead, and the more recent one by Mr. Moore. They will be noticed here only so far as a general knowledge of their character may be necessary to assist our judgment as to the opinions and conduct of their more celebrated sons. The rector of Epworth, like his excellent wife, had descended from parents distinguished for learning, piety, and nonconformity. His father dying whilst he was young, he forsook the Dissenters at an early period of life; and his conversion carried him into High Church principles, and political toryism. He was not however so rigid in the former as to prevent him from encouraging the early zeal of his sons, John and Charles, at Oxford, although it was even then somewhat irregular, when tried by the strictest rules of Church order and custom ; and his toryism, suffi¬ ciently high in theory, was yet of that class which regarded the rights of the subject tenderly in practice. He refused flattering overtures made by the adherents of James II, to induce him to support the measures of the court, and wrote ,in favour of the Revolution of 1688; admiring it, probably, less in a political view, than as rescuing a Protestant Church from the dangerous influence of a Popish head. For this service, he was presented with the living of Epworth, in Lincolnshire, to which, a few years afterward, was added that of Wroote, in the same county. 8 LIFE OF THE He held the living of Epworth upward of forty years, and was distinguished for the zeal and fidelity with which he discharged his parish duties. Of his talents and learn¬ ing, his remaining works afford honourable evidence. Mrs. Susanna Wesley, the mother of Mr. John Wesley, was, as might be expected from the eminent character of Dr. Samuel Annesley her father, educated with great care. Like her husband, she also, at an early period of life, renounced nonconformity, and became a member of the Established Church, after, as her biographers tell us, she had read and mastered the whole controversy on the sub¬ ject of separation ; of which, however, great as were her natural and acquired talents, she must, at the age of thir¬ teen years, have been a very imperfect judge. The serious habits impressed upon both by their education, did not for¬ sake them;—" they feared God, and wrought righteous¬ ness but we may perhaps account for that obscurity in the views of each on several great points of evangelical religion, and especially on justification by faith, and the offices of the Holy Spirit, which hung over their minds for many years, and indeed till toward the close of life, from this early change of their religious connections. Their theological reading, according to the fashion of the Church people of that day, was now directed rather to the writings of those divines of the English Church who were tinctured more or less with a Pelagianized Arminianism, than to the works of its founders ; their successors, the Puritans ; or of those eminent men among the Nonconformists, whose views of discipline they had renounced. They had parted with Calvinism ; but, like many others, they renounced with it, for want of spiritual discrimination, those truths which were as fully maintained in the theology of Arminius, and in that of their eminent son, who revived, and more fully illustrated it, as in the writings of the most judicious and spiritual Calvinistic divines themselves. Taylor, Til- lotson, and Bull, who became their oracles, were Armi- nians of a different class. The advantage of such a parentage to the Wesleys was great. From their earliest years they had an example in the father of all that could render a clergyman respectable and influential; and, in the mother, there was a sanctified wisdom, a masculine understanding, and an acquired REV. JOHN WESLEY. 9 knowledge, which they regarded with just deference after they became men and scholars. The influence of a piety so steadfast and uniform, joined to such qualities, and softened by maternal tenderness, could scarcely fail to produce effect. The firm and manly character, the prac¬ tical sense, the active and unwearied habits of the father, with the calm, reflecting, and stable qualities of the mother, were in particular inherited by Mr. John Wesley ; and in him were most happily blended. A large portion of the ecclesiastical principles and prejudices of the rector of Epworth was also transmitted to his three sons ; but whilst Samuel and Charles retained them least impaired, in John, as we shall see, they sustained in future life, considerable modifications. Samuel, the eldest son, was born in 1692 ; John, in 1703 ; and Charles, in 1708. Samuel Wesley, junior, was educated at Westminster school; and in 1711 was elected to Christ Church, Oxford. He was eminent for his learning, and was an excellent poet, with great power of satire, and an elegant wit. He held a considerable rank among the literary men of the day, and finally settled as head master of the free school of Tiverton, in Devonshire, where he died in 1739, in his forty-ninth year. Mrs. Wesley was the instructress of her children in their early years. " I can find," says Dr. Whitehead,*" no evidence that the boys were ever put to any school in the country; their mother having a very bad opinion of the common methods of instructing and governing children." She was particularly led, it would seem, to interest herself in John, who, when he was about six years old, had a providential and singular escape from being burned to death, upon the parsonage house being consumed.* There is a striking passage in one of her private meditations, which contains a reference to this event; and indicates that she considered it as laying her under a special obligation " to be more particularly careful of the soul of a child whom God had so mercifully provided for." The effect of this special care * The memory of his deliverance, on this occasion, is preserved in one of his early portraits, which has, below the head, the represent¬ ation of a house in flames, with the motto, "Is not this a brand plucked from the burning ?" 10 LIFE OF THE on the part of the mother was, that, under the Divine bless¬ ing, he became early serious ; for at the age of eight years he was admitted by his father to partake of the sacrament. In 1714, he was placed at the Charter house, " where he was noticed for his diligence, and progress in learning." (Whitehead's Life.) " Here, for his quietness, regularity, and application, he became a favourite with the master, Dr. Walker; and through life he retained so great a pre¬ dilection for the place, that on his annual visit to London, t>e made it a custom to walk through the scene of his boy¬ hood. To most men, every year would render a pilgrimage of this kind more painful than the last; but Wesley seems never to have looked back with melancholy upon the days 'hat were gone ; earthly regrets of this kind could find no room in one who was continually pressing onward to the goal." (Southey's Life.) When he had attained his seven¬ teenth year, he was elected to Christ Church, Oxford, " where he pursued his studies with great advantage, I believe under the direction of Dr. Wigan, a gentleman eminent for his classical knowledge. Mr. Wesley's natural temper in his youth was gay and sprightly, with a turn for wit and humour. When he was about twenty-one years of age, 'he appeared,' as Mr. Badcock has observed, 'the very sensible and acute collegian; a young fellow of the finest classical taste, of the most liberal and manly senti¬ ments.' (Westminster JWagazine.) His perfect knowledge of the classics gave a smooth polish to his wit, and an air of superior elegance to all his compositions. He had already begun to amuse himself occasionally with writing verses, though most of his poetical pieces, at this period, were, I believe, either imitations or translations of the Latin. Some time in this year, however, he wrote an imitation of the sixty-fifth Psalm, which he sent to his father, who says, '■ J like your verses on the sixty-fifth Psalm ; and would not have you bury your talent.' " (Whitehead's Life.) Some time after this, when purposing to take deacon's orders, he was roused from the religious carelessness into which he had fallen at college, and applied himself dili¬ gently to the reading of divinity. This more thoughtful frame appears to have been indicated in his letters to his mother, with whom he kept up a regular correspondence ; for she replies, " The alteration of your temper has occa- KEV. JOHN WESLEY 11 sioned me much speculation. I, who am apt to be san¬ guine, hope it may proceed from the operations of God's Holy Spirit, that, by taking off your relish for earthly enjoyments, he may prepare and dispose your mind for a Itoore serious and close application to things of a more sublime and spiritual nature. If it be so, happy are you if you cherish those dispositions ; and now, in good earn¬ est, resolve to make religion the business of your life; for, after all, that is the one thing which, strictly speaking, is necessary: all things beside are comparatively little to the purposes of life. I heartily wish you would now enter upon a strict examination of yourself, that you may know, whether you have a reasonable hope of salvation by Jesus Christ. If you have, the satisfaction of knowing it will abundantly reward your pains ; if you have not, you will find a more reasonable occasion for tears than can be met with in a tragedy. This matter deserves great considera¬ tion by all, but especially by those designed for the minis¬ try ; who ought, above all things, to make their own calling and election sure ; lest, after they have preached to others* they themselves should be cast away." This excellent advice was not lost upon him; and indeed his mother's admirable letters were among the principal means, under God, of producing that still more decided change in his views which soon afterward began to dis¬ play itself. He was now about twenty-two years of age. The practical books most read by him at this period, which was probably employed as a course of preparation for holy orders, were, " The Christian's Pattern," by Thomas h Kempis ; and Bishop Taylor's "Rules of Holy Living and Dyingand his correspondence with his parents respecting these authors shows how carefully he was weighing their merits, and investigating their mean¬ ing, as regarding them in the light of spiritual instructers. The letters of his mother on the points offered to her con¬ sideration by her son, show, in many respects, a deeply thinking and discriminating mind; but they are also in proof that both she and her husband had given up their acquaint¬ ance, if they ever had any, with works which might have been recommended as much more suitable to -the state of their son's mind, and far superior as a directory to true Christianity. This to him would have been infinitely 12 LIFE OF THE more important than discussing the peculiar views, and adjusting the proportion of excellency and defect, which may be found in such a writer as Kempis, whose " Chris¬ tian's Pattern" is, where in reality excellent, a manual rather for him who is a Christian already, than for him who is seeking to become one. A few things are however to be remarked in this cor¬ respondence which are of considerable interest, as showing the bearings of Mr. Wesley's views as to those truths of which he afterward obtained a satisfactory conviction, and then so clearly stated and defended. The son, in writing to his mother on Bishop Taylor's book, states several particulars which Bishop Taylor makes necessary parts of humility and repentance ; one of which, in reference to humility, is, that "we must be sure, in some sense or other, to think ourselves the worst in every com¬ pany where we come." And in treating of repentance he says, "Whether God has forgiven us, or no, we know not; therefore be sorrowful for ever having sinned." " I take the more notice of this last sentence," says Mr. Wesley, " because it seems to contradict his own words in the next section, where he says, that by the Lord's Supper all the members are united to one another, and to Christ the head. The Holy Ghost confers on us the graces neces¬ sary for, and our souls receive the seeds of, an immortal nature. Now, surely, these graces are not of so little force as that we cannot perceive whether we have them, or not: if we dwell in Christ, and Christ in us, which he will not do unless we are regenerate, certainly we must be sensible of it. If we can never have any certainty of our being in a state of salvation, good reason it is that every moment should be spent, not in joy, but in fear and trem¬ bling ; and then undoubtedly, in this life, we are of all men most miserable. God deliver us from such a fearful ex¬ pectation as this ! Humility is, undoubtedly, necessary to salvation; and if all these things are essential to humility, who can be humble 1 who can be saved 1" The mother, in reply, suggests to him some good thoughts and useful distinctions on the subject of humility ; but omits to afford him any assistance on the point of the pos¬ sibility of obtaining a comfortable persuasion of being in a state of salvation, through the influence of the Holy Spirit; REV. JOHN WESLEY. 13 which he already discerned to be the privilege of a real believer, though as yet he was greatly perplexed as to the means of attaining it. At this period too he makes the important distinction between assurance of present, and assurance of future, salvation ; by confounding which, so many, from their objection to the Calvinistic notion of the infallible perseverance of the saints, have given up the doc¬ trine of assurance altogether. " That we can never be so certain of the pardon of our sins, as to be assured they will never rise up against us, I firmly believe. We know that they will infallibly do so if ever we apostatize ; and I am not satisfied what evidence there can be of our final perseverance, till we have finished our course. But I am persuaded we may know if we are now in a state of salva¬ tion, since that is expressly promised in the Holy Scrip¬ tures to our sincere endeavours ; and we are surely able to judge of our own sincerity." The latter part of this extract will, however, show how much he had yet to learn as to " the way to the Father." Mrs. Wesley also corrects a defective definition of faith, which her son's letter had contained, in the following sensible remarks; which are just, as far as they go, but below the true Scriptural standard, and the proper concep¬ tion of that saving faith after which her son was inquiring: " You are somewhat mistaken in your notions of faith. All faith is an assent, but all assent is not faith. Some truths are self-evident, and we assent to them because they are so. Others, after a regular and formal process of reason by way of deduction from some self-evident principle, gain our assent. This is not properly faith, but science. Some again we assent to, not because they are self-evident, or because we have attained the knowledge of them in a regular method by a train of arguments, but because they have been revealed to us, either by God or man ; and these are the proper objects of faith. The true measure of faith is the authority of the revealer; the weight of which always holds proportion to our conviction of his ability and integrity. Divine faith is an assent to whatever God has revealed to us, because he has revealed it." Predestination was another subject touched upon in this interesting correspondence. Mr. Wesley was probably led to it by. his review of the Articles of the Church previous 2 14 life of the to his ordination; and he thus expresses himself on this oontroverted subject: " What then shall I say of predesti¬ nation? An everlasting purpose of God to deliver some from damnation, does, I suppose, exclude all from that deliverance who are not chosen. And if it was inevitably decreed from eternity, that such a determinate part of man¬ kind should be saved, and none beside them, a vast ma¬ jority of the world were only born to eternal death, without so much as a possibility of avoiding it. How is this con¬ sistent with either the divine justice or mercy 1 Is it merci¬ ful to ordain a creature to everlasting misery 1 Is it just to punish a man for crimes which he could not but commit 1 That God should be the author of sin and injustice, which must, I think, be the consequence of maintaining this opinion, is a contradiction to the clearest ideas we have of the divine nature and perfections." (Whitehead's Life.) From these views he never departed ; and the terms he uses contain indeed the only rational statement of the whole question. He was ordained deacon in September, 1725, and the year following was elected fellow of Lincoln College. His previous seriousness had been the subject of much banter and ridicule, and appears to have been urged against him, in the election, by his opponents ; but his reputation for learning and diligence, and the excellence of his character, triumphed; and, what was probably to him the greatest pleasure, he had the gratification of seeing the joy this event gave to his venerable parents, and which was emphatically expressed in their letters. Several specimens of his poetry, composed about this time, are given by his biographers, which show that, had he cultivated that department of literature, he would not have occupied an inferior plaee among the tasteful and elegant votaries of verse: but he soon found more serious and more useful employment. He spent the summer after his election to the fellowship with his parents, in Lincolnshire, and took that opportunity of conversing with them at large upon those serious topics which then fully occupied his mind. In September, he returned to Oxford, and resumed his usual studies. " His literary character was now established in the university; he was acknowledged by all parties to be a man of talents, and an excellent critic in the learned languages. His REV. JOHN WESLEY. 15 compositions were distinguished by an elegant simplicity of style, and justness of thought, that strongly marked the excellence of his classical taste. His skill in logic, or the art of reasoning, was universally known and admired. The high opinion that was entertained of him in these respects was soon publicly expressed, by choosing him Greek lec¬ turer, and moderator of the classes, on the seventh of No¬ vember ; though he had only been elected fellow of the college in March, was little more than twenty-three years of age, and had not proceeded master of arts." (White¬ head's Life.) He took this degree in February, 1727; became his father's curate in August the same year; re¬ turned to Oxford in 1728, to obtain priest's orders ; and paid another visit to Oxford in 1729 ; where, during his stay, he attended the meetings of a small society formed by his brother Charles, Mr. Morgan, and a few others, to assist each other in their studies, and to consult how to employ their time to the best advantage. After about a month, he returned to Epworth ; but upon Dr. Morley, the rector of his college, requiring his residence, he quitted his father's curacy, and in November again settled in Oxford. He now obtained pupils, and became tutor in the college ; presided as moderator in the disputations six times a week ; and had the chief direction of a religious society. From this time he stood more prominently forward in his religious character, and in efforts to do good to others; and began more fully to. prove that " they that will live godly in Christ Jesus, must suffer persecution." It is however necessary to turn to the history of Mr. Charles Wesley, whose labours in the early periods of Methodism were inferior only to those of his brother. Charles Wesley was, as above stated, five years younger than his brother John ; and was educated at Westminster school, under his eldest brother, Samuel, from whom he is said to have derived a still stronger tincture of High Church principles than was imbibed under the paternal roof. " When he had been some years at school, Mr. R. Wesley, a gentleman of large fortune in Ireland, wrote to his father, and asked if he had any son named Charles ; if so, he would make him his heir. Accordingly, a gentle¬ man in London brought money for his education several 16 LIFE OF THE years. But one year another gentleman called, probably Mr. Wesley himself, talked largely with him, and asked if he was willing to go with him to Ireland. Mr. Charles desired to write to his father, who answered immediately, and referred it to his own choice. He chose to stay in England." (Whitehead's Life, vol. i, p. 98.) " Mr. John Wesley, in his account of his brother, calls this a fair escape. The fact is more remarkable than he was aware of; for the person who inherited the property intended for Charles Wesley, and who took the name of Wesley, or Wellesley, in consequence, was the first Earl of Morning- ton, grandfather of Marquis Wellesley and the Duke of Wellington." (South-ey's Life.) The lively disposition of Charles, although he pursued his studies diligently, and was unblamable in his conduct, repelled all those exhortations to a more strictly religious course which John seriously urged upon him, after he was elected to Christ Church. During his brother's absence, as his father's curate, his letters, however, became more grave; and when Mr. John Wesley returned to Oxford, in November, 1729, "I found him," he observes, "in great earnestness to save his soul." His own account of him¬ self is, that he lost his first year at college in diversions ? that the next, he set himself to study; that diligence led him into serious thinking; that he went to the weekly sacrament, persuading two or three students to accompany him; and that he observed the method of study prescribed by the statutes of the university. "This," says he, "gained me the harmless name of MethodistThus it appears * From the name of an ancient sect of physicians, say some of Mr. Wesley's biographers; but probably the wits of Oxford, who imposed the name, knew nothing of that sect of the middle age,s. The Non¬ conformists were often called, in derision, Methodists; and the name was probably transmitted from them; or it might be given merely from the rigid adherence to method in study by Mr. Charles Wesley. It is, however, somewhat worthy of notice, that before the times of Nonconformity, properly so called, we find Methodists mentioned as one of the minor sects in conjunction with the Anabaptists; for, as early as 1639, in a .sermon preached at Lambeth, they are rated in good set style for their aversion to rhetorical sermons:—" Where are now our Anabaptists and plain pack-staff' Methodists, who esteem of all flowers of rhetoric in sermons no better than stinking weeds, and of all elegancies of speech no better than profane spells?" &c. Their fault in those days, it appears, was to prefer plain preaching; no bad compliment, though an undesigned one. The epithet used to describe rev. john wesley. 17 that Charles was the first modern Methodist, and that he in fact laid the foundations of the religious society which continues to be distinguished by that appellation. To this society Mr. John Wesley joined himself on his return to reside at Oxford; and by his influence and energy gave additional vigour to their exertions to promote their own spiritual improvement, and the good of others. The union of system and efficiency which this association presented well accorded with his practical and governing mind ; and, no doubt, under the leadings of a superior agency, of which he was unconscious, he was thus training himself to those habits of regular and influential exertion and enterprize which subsequently rendered him the instrument of a re¬ vival of religion throughout the land. Of the little society of which, by the mere force of his character, he thus be¬ came the head, Mr. Hervey, the author of the " Medita¬ tions," and the celebrated Whitefield, were members. CHAPTER II. The strictly religious profession which Mr. Wesley must now be considered as making at Oxford,—a profession so strongly marked as to become matter of public notice, and accompanied with so much zeal as to excite both ridicule and opposition, requires to be carefully examined. After all, he thought himself to be but " almost," and not " alto¬ gether," a Christian,—a conclusion of a very perplexing kind to many who have set up themselves for better judges in "his case, than he himself. From a similar cause, we have seen St. Paul all but reproved by some divines for representing himself "as the chief of sinners," at the time when he was " blameless" as to " the righteousness of the law;" and, but for the courtesy due to an inspired man, he them, may also intimate that they were plain in dress and manners.. At a later period, 1693, some of the Nonconformists who had renounced the imputation of Christ's righteousness in justification, except in the merit of it, and whose views were somewhat similar to those of the Wesleyan Methodists on the imputation of faith for righteousness, were called by their brethren, the New Methodists. They were not however a sect, but were so denominated from the new method which they took in stating the doctrine of justification. Thus we have aCalvinistic pamphlet, under this date, written against " the principles of the New Methodists in the great point of justification." 18 UPB OF THE would, probably, in direct contradiction to his own words, have been pronounced the chief of saints ; although his heart remained a total stranger to humility and charity. The Wesleys at Oxford were indeed not only in a higher but in an essentially different state of religious experience from that of Saul of Tarsus, notwithstanding his array of legal zeal and external virtue ; but if our views of personal religion must be taken from the New Testament, although as to men they were blameless and exemplary, yet, in respect to God, those internal changes had not taken place in them which it is the office of real Christianity to effect. They were, however, most sincere ; they were " faithful in that which is little," and God gave them " the true riches." They " sought God with all their heart;" and they ultimately found him, but in a way which at that time "they knew not." The very writers, Bishop Taylor and Mr. Law, who so powerfully wrought upon their con¬ sciences, were among the most erring guides to that " peace of God which passeth all understanding," for which they sighed ; and those celebrated divines, excelled by none for genius and eloquence, who could draw the picture of a practical piety so copious and exact in its external manifestations, were unable to teach that mystic connection of the branches with the vine, from which the only fruits which are of healthy growth and genuine flavour can proceed. Both are too defective in their views of faith, and of its object the atonement of Christ, to be able to direct a penitent and troubled spirit into the way of salva¬ tion, and to show how all the principles and acts of truly Christian piety are sustained by a life of " faith in the Son of God." To this subject, however, Mr. Wesley's own account of himself will, subsequently, again call our at¬ tention. Bishop Taylor's chapter on purity of intention first con¬ vinced Mr. Wesley of the necessity of being holy in heart, as well as regular in his outward conduct; and having, for the first time, formed an acquaintance with a religious friend, " he began to alter the whole form of his conversa¬ tion, and to set in earnest upon a new life." " He com municated every Aveek. He watched against all sin, whether in word or deed, and began to aim at, and pray for, inward holiness;" (Journal;) but still with a painful REV. JOHN WESLEY. W consciousness that he found not that which he so earnestly sought. His error, at this period, was drawn from his theological guides just mentioned ; he either confounded sanctification with justification, that is, a real with a rela¬ tive change, or he regarded sanctification as a preparation for, and a condition of, justification. He had not yet learned the Apostle's doctrine, the gratuitous justification of " the ungodly," when penitent, and- upon the sole con¬ dition of believing in Christ; nor that upon this there fol- loios a " death" unto all inward and outward sin ; so that he who is so justified can " no longer continue therein." It is, however, deeply interesting, to trace the progress of his mind through its agitations, inquiries, hopes, and fears, until the moment when he found that steadfast peace which never afterward forsook him, but gave serenity to his coun¬ tenance, and cheerfulness to his heart, to the last hour of a prolonged life. The effects of the strong impression which had been iqade upon him by the practical writings of Taylor and Law promptly manifested themselves. The discipline he maintained as a tutor over his pupils was more strict than the university had been accustomed to witness; and for this reason, that it was more deeply and comprehensively conscientious. He regarded himself as responsible to God for exerting himself to his utmost, not only to pro¬ mote their learning, but to regulate their moral habits, and to form their religious principles. Here his disciplinary habits had their first manifestation. He required them to rise very early; he directed their .reading, and controlled their general conduct, by rules to which he exacted entire obedience. This was not well taken by the friends of some; but from others he received very grateful letters; and several of his pupils themselves were not insensible of the obligations they owed to him, not only on a religious account, but for thus enabling them to reap the full advan¬ tages of that seat of learning, by restraining them from its dissipations. The little society of Methodists, as they were called, began now to extend its operations. When Mr. Wesley joined them, they committed its management to him, and he has himself stated its original members:— " In November, 1729. four young gentlemen of Oxford, 20 LIFE OF THE Mr. John Wesley, fellow of Lincoln College; Mr. Charles Wesley, student of Christ Church ; Mr. Morgan, com¬ moner of Christ Church ; and Mr. Kirkman, of Merton College, began to spend some evenings in a week together, in reading chiefly the Greek Testament. The next year, two or three of Mr. John Wesley's pupils desired the liber¬ ty of meeting with them ; and afterward one of Mr. Charles Wesley's pupils. It was in 1732 that Mr. Ingham, of Queen's College, and Mr. Broughton, of Exeter, were added to their number. To these, in April, was joined Mr. Clayton, of Brazen-nose, with two or three of his pupils. About the same time Mr. James Hervey was per¬ mitted to meet with them, and afterward Mr. Whitefield." {Journal.) Mr. Morgan led the way to their visiting the prisoners in the Oxford gaol, for the purpose of affording them reli¬ gious instruction. They afterward resolved to spend two or three hours a week in visiting and relieving the poor and the sick, generally, where the parish ministers did not object to it. This was, however, so novel a practice, and might be deemed by some so contrary to Church order, that Mr. Wesley consulted his father upon the point. Mr. Wesley, senior, answered the inquiry in a noble letter, equally honourable to his feelings as a father, and a minis¬ ter of Christ. They had his full sanction for prosecuting their pious labours; he blessed God who had given him two sons together at Oxford, who had received grace and courage to turn the war against the world and the devil; he bids them defy reproach, and animates them in God's name to go on in the path to which their Saviour had directed them. At the same time, he advjses them to consult with the Chaplain of the prison, and to obtain the approbation of the bishop. This high sanction was obtained ; but it was not sufficient to screen them from the rebukes of the gravely lukewarm, or the malignantly vicious'. Sarcasm and serious opposition robbed them of one of their number, who had not fortitude to bear the shafts of ridicule, or to resist the persuasion of friends ; and the opposition being now headed by some persons of influence, Mr. Wesley had again recourse, by letter, to his father's counsel. The answer deserves to be transcribed at length :— " This day I received both yours, and this evening, in rev. john wesley, 21 the course of our reading, I thought I found an answer that would be more proper, than any I myself could dictate; though since it will not be easily translated, I send it in the original. IIoXXtj (xot xour^dig Wsp up,wv* 35sirX?jpwp.ai t*) zsap- AxXyrfsr uirspir£pi But I made no stumble at all, nor the least slip, till ,1 was entirely out of their hjpnds. 2. That although many strove to lay hold on my collar or clothes to pull me down, they could not fasten at all; only one got fast hold REV. JOHN WESLEY. 109 of Jhe flap of my waistcoat, which was soon left in his hand. 3. That a lusty man just behind, struck at me several times with a large oaken stick ; with which if he had struck me once on the bgick part of my head, it would have saved him all farther trouble : but every time the blow.was turned aside, I know not how. 4. That another came rushing through the press, and raising his arm to strike, on a sudden let it,.drop, and only stroked my head, saying, ' What soft hair he has !' 5. That I stopped exactly at the mayor's door, as if I had known it, which the mob doubtless thought I did, and found him standing in the shop ; which gave the first check to the madness of the people. 6. That the very first men whose hearts were turned, were the heroes of the town, the captains of the rabble on all occasions ; one of them having been a prize fighter at the bear gardens. 7. That from first to last I heard none give a reviling word, or call me by any opprobrious name whatever. But the cry of one and all was, ' The preacher ! the preacher ! the parson! the minister !' 8. That no creature, at least within my hear¬ ing, laid any thing to my charge, either true or false; having in the hurry quite forgot to provide themselves with an accusation of any kind. And, lastly, they were utterly at a loss what they should do with me ; none proposing any determinate thing, only, 4 Away with him; kill him at once.' " When I came back to Francis Ward's, I found many of our brethren waiting upon God. Many also, whom I had never seen before, came to rejoice with us ; and the next morning as I rode through the town, in my way to Nottingham, every one I met expressed such a cordial affection, that I could scarce believe what I saw and heard." At Nottingham he met with Mr. Charles Wesley, who has inserted in his Journal a notice of the meeting, highly characteristic of the spirit of martyrdom in which both of them lived:— 44 My brother came, delivered out of the mouth of the lions ! His clothes were torn to tatters; he looked like a soldier of Christ. The mob of Wednesbury, Darlaston, and Walsal, were permitted to take and carry him about for several hours, with a full intent to murder him: but his 10 110 LIFE OF THE work is not yet finished, or he had been now with the souls under the altar." Undaunted by the usage of John, Charles immediately set out for Wednesbury, to encourage the societies. In this year Mr. Wesley made his first journey into Cornwall, where his brother, led by the same sympathies to communicate the Gospel to the then rude and neglected miners of that extreme part of the kingdom, as had induced him to visit the colliers of Kingswood, Staffordshire, and the North, had preceded him. Here he had preached in various places, sometimes amidst mobs, "as desperate as that at Sheffield." Mr. Wesley followed in August, and came to St. Ives, where he found a small religious society, which had been formed upon Dr. Woodward's plan. They gladly received him, and formed the nucleus of the Method¬ ist societies in Cornwall, which from this time rapidly increased. In this visit he spent three weeks, preaching in the most populous parts of the mining district, with an effect which still continues to be felt. In no part of Eng¬ land has Methodism obtained more influence than in the west of Cornwall. It has become in fact the leading pro¬ fession of the people, and its moral effects upon society may be looked upon with the highest satisfaction and gratitude. Nor were the Cornish people ungrateful to the instrument of the benefit. When he was last in the county, in old age, the man who had formerly slept on the ground for want of a lodging, and picked blackberries to satisfy his hunger, and who had narrowly escaped with his life from a desperate mob at Falmouth, passed through the towns and villages as in a triumphal march, whilst the windows were crowded with people, anxious to get a sight of him, and to pronounce upon him their benedictions. Between this visit andHhat of the next year, a hot perse¬ cution, both of the preachers and people, broke forth. The preaching house at St. Ives was pulled to the ground : one of the preachers was impressed and sent for a soldier, as were several of the people : whilst being stoned, covered with dirt, and abused, was the treatment which many others of them met with from day to day. But notwithstanding this, they who had been eminent for hurling, fighting, drinking, and all manner of wickedness, continued eminent for sobriety, piety, and meekness. The impressment of RE'V, JOHN WESLEY. Ill the preachers for soldiers by the magistrates was not, how¬ ever, confined to Cornwall. About the same time John Nelson and Thomas Beard were thus Seized, and sent for soldiers, for no other crime, eithei\cornmitted or pretended, than that of calling sinners to repentance. The passive heroism of John Nelson is well known. Thomas Beard also was " nothing terrified by his adversaries but his body after a while sunk under affliction. • He was then lodged in the hospital of Newcastle, where he still praised God continually. His fever increasing, he was let blood: his arm festered, mortified, and was cut off; two or three days after which, God signed his discharge, and called him to his eternal home. v The riots in Staffordshire, also, still continued. " The mob of Walsal, Darlaston, and Wednesbury, hired for the purpose by their superiors, broke open their poor neigh¬ bours' houses at their pleasure by day and by night; extorting money from the few that had it, taking away or destroying their victuals and goods, beating and wounding their bodies, insulting the women, and openly declaring they would destroy every Methodist in the country. Thus his majesty's peaceable and loyal subjects were treated for eight months, and were then publicly branded in the Whitehall and London Evening Post, for rioters and incendiaries !" (Whitehead's Life.) Several other instances of the brutal maltreatment of the preachers occurred in these early periods, which ended in disablement, or premature death. The persecution at St. Ives, Mr. Wesley observes, " was owing in great measure to the indefatigable labours of Mr. Hoblin, and Mr. Simmons, gentlemen worthy to be had in everlasting remembrance for their unwearied endeavours to destroy heresy. Fortunati ambo! Siquid mea pagina possit, Nulla dies unquam memori vos eximet cevo. ( " Happy both! Long as my writings, shall your fame remain." In August, 1744, Mr. John Wesley preached for the last time before the university of Oxford. Mr. Charles Wesley was present, and observes in his Journal: " My brother bore his testimony before a crowded audience, much increased by the races. Never have I seen a more 112 1IFE OF THE attentive congregation ; they did not suffer a word to escape them. Some of the heads of colleges stood up the whole time, and fixed their eyes upon him. If they can endure sound doctrine, like his, he will surely leave a blessing behind him. The vice-chancellor sent after him, and desired his notes, which he sealed up and sent imme¬ diately." His own remarks upon this occasion are, "I am now clear of the blood of those men. I have fully delivered my own soul. And I am well pleased that it should be the very day on which, in the last century, near two thovi- sand burning and shining lights were put out at one stroke. Yet what a wide difference is there between their case and mine ! They were turned out of house and home, and all that they had; whereas I am only hindered from preaching in one place, without any other less, and that in a kind of honourable manner; it being determined, that, whdn my next turn to preach came, they would pay another person to preach for me. And so they did twice or thrice, even to the time I resigned my fellowship." (Journal.) Mr. Wesley had at this time a correspondence with the Rev. James Erskine, from whom he learned that several pious ministers and others, in Scotland, duly appreciated his character, and rejoiced in the success of his labours, notwithstanding the difference of their sentiments. Mr. Erskine's letter indeed contains a paragraph which breathes a liberality not very common in those days, and which may be useful in the present, after all our boast¬ ings of enlarged charity : " Are the points which give the different denominations, (to Christians,) and from whence proceed separate communities, animosities, evil speakings, surmises, and, at least, coolness of affection, aptness to misconstrue, slowness to think well of others, stiffness in one's own conceits, and overvaluing one's own opinion, &c, &c : are these points (at least among the far greatest part of Protestants) as important, as clearly revealed, and as essential, or as closely connected with the essentials of practical Christianity, as the loving of one another with a pure heart fervently, and not forsaking, much less refus¬ ing, the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some was, and now of almost all is 1" (Journal.) In a subsequent letter this excellent man expresses an REV. JOHN WESLEY. 113 ardent wish for union among all those of different denomi¬ nations and opinions who love the Lord Jesus Christ; and on such a subject, he was-speaking to a kindred mind ; for no man ever set a better example of Christian charity, and nowhere is the excellence and obligation of that temper more forcibly drawn and inculcated than in his most in¬ teresting Sermon on " A Catholic Spirit." With such a testimony and example before them, his followers would be the most inexcusable class of Christians were they to indulge in that selfish sectarianism with which he was so often unjustly charged; and for which they, though not faultless in this respect, have also been censured more frequently and indiscriminately than they have merited. It would scarcely be doing justice to this part of Mr. Wesley's character not to insert an extract from the Ser¬ mon alluded to:— " Is thy heart right with God 1 If it be, give me thy hand. I do not mean, ' Be of my opinion.' You need not. I do not expect or desire it. Neither do I mean, ' I will be of your opinion.' I cannot. It does not depend on my choice ; I can no more think, than I can see or hear, as I will. Keep you your opinion : I mine ; and that as steadily as ever. You need not endeavour to come over to me, or bring me over to you. I do not desire you to dispute those points, or to hear or speak one word con¬ cerning them. Let all opinions alone on one side and the other. Only'give me thine hand.' " I do not mean, ' Embrace my modes of worship ; or, I will embrace yours.' This also is a thing which does not depend either on your choice or mine. We must both act as each is fully persuaded in his own mind. Hold you fast that which you believe is most acceptable to God, and I will do the same. I believe the Episcopal form of church government to be Scriptural and Apostolical. If you think the Presbyterian or Independent is better, think so still, and act accordingly. I believe infants ought to be baptized, and that this may be done either by dipping or sprinkling. If you are otherwise persuaded, be so still, and follow your own persuasion. It appears to me, that forms of prayer are of excellent use, particularly in the great congregation. If you judge extemporary prayer to be of more use, act suitable to your own judgment. My senti- 10* 114 LIFE OF THE ment is, that I ought not to forbid water, wherein persons may be baptized ; and, that I ought to eat bread and drink wine, as memorials of my dying Master. However, if you are not convinced of this, act according to the light you have. I have no desire to dispute with you one moment upon any of the preceding heads. Let all these smaller points stand aside. Let them never come into sight. ' If thine heart be as my heart,' if thou love God and all man¬ kind, I ask no more : ' Give me thy hand.' " I mean, First, love me. And that not only as thou lovest all mankind ; not only as thou lovest thine enemies, or the enemies of God, those that hate thee, that ' despite- fully use thee, and persecute thee :' not only as a stranger, as one of whom thou knowest neither good nor evil. I am not satisfied with this. No; 'If thine heart be right, as mine with thy heart,' then love me with a very tender affec¬ tion, as a friend that is closer than a brother, as a brother in Christ, a fellow citizen of the New Jerusalem, a fellow soldier engaged in the same warfare, under the same Captain of our salvation. Love me as a companion in the kingdom and patience of Jesus, and a joint heir of his glory. " Love me (but in a higher degree than thou dost the bulk of mankind) with the love that is ' long-suffering and kind;' that is patient, if I am ignorant or out of the way, bearing and not increasing my burden ; and is tender, soft, and compassionate still; that ' envieth not,' if at any time it please God to prosper me in this work even more than thee. Love me with the love that' is not provoked' either at my follies or infirmities, or even at my acting (if it should sometimes so appear to thee) not according to the will of God. Love me so as to ' think no evil' of me, to put away all jealousy and evil surmising. Love me with the love that 'covereth all things;' that never reveals either my faults or infirmities, that ' believeth all things,' is always willing to think the best, to put the fairest construction on all my words and actions ; that ' hopeth all things ;' eithei that the thing related was never done, or not done with such circumstances as are related ; or at least, that it was done with a good intention, or in a sudden stress of temp¬ tation. And hope to the end, that whatever is amiss will, by the grace of God be corrected, and whatever is want- REV. JOHN WESLEY. 115 ing supplied, through the riches of his mercy in Christ Jesus." (Sermons.) And then, having shown how a Catholic spirit differs from practical and speculative latitudinarianism and indif¬ ference, he concludes : " A man of a Catholic spirit is one who, in the manner above mentioned, ' gives his hand' to all whose 'hearts are right with his heart.' One who knows how to value and praise God for all the advantages he enjoys, with regard to the knowledge of the things of God, the true Scriptural manner of worshipping him ; and above all, his union with a congregation fearing God and working righteousness. One who, retaining these bless¬ ings with the strictest care, keeping them as the apple of his eye, at the same time loves as friends, as brethren in the Lord, as members of Christ and children of God, as joint partakers now of the present kingdom of God, and fellow heirs ofhis eternal kingdom, all, of whatever opinion, or worship, or congregation, who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, who love God and man, who, rejoicing to please and fearing to offend God, are careful to abstain from evil, and zealous of good works. He is the man of a truly Catholic spirit, who bears all these continually upon his heart, who, having an unspeakable tenderness for their persons, and longing for their welfare, does not cease to commend them to God in prayer, as well as to plead their cause before men ; who speaks comfortably to them, and labours by all his words to strengthen their hands in God. He assists them to the uttermost of his power in all things, spiritual and temporal. He is ready ' to spend and be spent for them yea, ' to lay down his life for their sake.'" (Sermons.) The first Conference was held in June, 1744. The societies had spread through various parts of the kingdom; and a number of preachers, under the name of assistants and helpers, the former being superintendents of the latter, had been engaged by Mr. Wesley in the work. Some clergymen, also, more or less cooperated to promote these attempts to spread the flame of true religion, and were not yet afraid of the cross. These circumstances led to the distribution of different parts of the kingdom into circuits, to which certain preachers were for a time appointed, and were then removed to others. The superintendence of the 116 life of the whole was in the two brothers, but particularly in Mr. John Wesley. The annual conferences afforded, therefore, an admirable opportunity of conversing on important points and distinctions of doctrine, that all might " speak the same thing" in their public ministrations ; and of agreeing upon such a discipline as the new circumstances in which the societies were placed might require. The labours of the preachers for the ensuing year were also arranged; and consultation was held on all matters connected with the promotion of the work of God, in which they were engaged. Every thing went on, however, not on preconceived plan, but " step by step," as circumstances suggested, and led the way. To the great principle of doing good to the souls of men, every thing was subordinated ; not excepting even their prejudices and fears, as will appear from the Minutes of the first conference, which was held in London, as just stated, in 1744. The ultimate separation of the societies from the Church, after the death of the first agents in the work, was at that early period contemplated as a possibility, and made a subject of conversation; and the resolution was, "We do and will do all we can to prevent those consequences which are supposed to be likely to hap¬ pen after our death; but we cannot, in good conscience, neglect the present opportunity of saving souls while we live, for fear of consequences which may possibly, or pro¬ bably, happen after we are dead." To this principle Mr. Wesley was " faithful unto death," and it is the true key to his public conduct. His brother, after some years, less steadily adhered to it; and most of the clergymen, who attached themselves to Mr. Wesley in the earlier periods of Methodism, found it too bold a position, and one which exposed them to too severe a fire, to be maintained by them. It required a firmer courage than theirs to hold out at such a post; but the founder of Methodism never be¬ trayed the trust which circumstances had laid upon him. CHAPTER YIH. The year 1745 was chiefly spent by Mr. Charles Wes¬ ley in London, Bristol, and Wales. In the early part of the next year, he paid a visit to a society raised up by Mr. Whitefield at Plymouth, and from thence proceeded-into REV. JOHN WESLEY. 117 Cornwall, where he preached in various places with great success ; but in some of them amidst much persecution. He reviewed this journey with great thankfulness, because of the effects which had been produced by his ministry ; and at the close of it he wrote the hymn beginning with the stanza,— " All thanks be to God, Who scatters abroad Throughout every place, By the least of his servants, his savour of grace: Who the victory gave The praise let him have; For the work he hath done; All honour and glory to Jesus alone!" On his return to London, through the introduction of Mr. E. Perronet, a pious young man, he visited the Rev. Yincent Perronet, the venerable vicar of Shoreham in Kent, a very holy and excellent clergyman, of whose wise and considerate counsels the Wesleys afterward frequently availed themselves, in all matters which involved particu¬ lar difficulty. The name of Wesley was however, it seems, every where become a signal for riot; for being invited to perform service in Shoreham church, " as soon," says he, " as I began to preach, the wild beasts began roaring, stamping, blaspheming, ringing the bells, and turning the church into a bear garden. I spoke on for half an hour, though only the nearest could hear. The rioters followed us to Mr. Perronet's house, raging, threatening, and throw¬ ing stones. Charles Perronet hung over me to intercept the blows. They continued their uproar after we got into the house." (Journal.) Mr. E. Perronet returned with him to London, and accompanied him on a tour to the north. On the way, they visited Staffordshire, which was still riotous and persecuting; and Mr. Charles Wesley's young friend had a second specimen of the violent and ignorant prejudice with which these modern apostles were followed. The mob beset the house at Tippen Green, and, beating at the door, demanded entrance. " I sat still," says he, " in the midst of them for half an hour, and was a.little concerned for E. Perronet lest such rough treatment, at -jftfs first setting out, should daunt him. But he abounded in valour, and was for reasoning with the wild beasts before they had spent any of their violence. He got a deal of 118 LIFE OF THE abuse thereby, and not a little dirt, both of which he took very patiently. I had no design to preach ; but being called upon by so unexpected a congregation, I rose at last, and read, 'When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit on the throne of his glory.' Wrhile I reasoned with them ■of judgment to come, they grew calmer by little and little. I then spake to them, one by one, till the Lord had dis¬ armed them all. One who stood out the longest, I held by the hand, and urged the love of Christ crucified, till, in spite of both his natural and diabolical courage, he trembled like a leaf. I was constrained to break out into prayer for him. Our leopards were all become lambs ; and very kind we were at parting. Near midnight the house was clear and quiet. We gave thanks to God for our salvation, and slept in peace." (Journal.) Proceeding onward to Dewsbury, he met with an in¬ stance of clerical candour, which, as it was rare in those times, deserves to be recorded : " The minister did not condemn the society unheard, but talked with them, ex¬ amined into the doctrine they had been taught, and its effects on their lives. When he found that as many as had been affected by the preaching were evidently reformed and brought to church and sacrament, he testified his ap¬ probation of the work, and rejoiced that sinners were con¬ verted to God." (Whitehead's Life.) After visiting Newcastle, he went, at the request of Mr. Wardrobe, a dissenting minister, to Hexham, where the following incidents occurred: "I walked directly to the market place, and called sinners to repentance. A multi¬ tude of them stood staring at me, but all quiet. The Lord opened my mouth, and they drew nearer and nearer, stole off their hats, and listened ; none offered to interrupt, but oae unfortunate esquire who could get no one to second him. His servants and the constables hid themselves; one he found, and bid him go and take me down. The poor constable simply answered, ' Sir, I cannot have the face to do it, for what harm does he do V Several Papists attended, and the Church minister who had refused me his pulpit with indignation. However, he came to hear with his own ears. I wish all who hang us first would, like him, try us afterward. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 119 " I walked back to Mr. Ord's through the people, who acknowledged, ' It is the truth, and none can speak against it.' A constable followed, and told me, 'Sir Edward Blacket orders you to disperse the town,' (depart, I suppose he meant,) ' and not raise a disturbance here.' I sent my respects to Sir Edward, and said, if he would give me leave, I would wait upon him and satisfy him. He soon returned with an answer that Sir Edward would have nothing to say to me; but if I preached again, . and raised a disturbance, he would put the law in execution against me. I answered that I was not conscious of break¬ ing any law of God or man ; but if I did, I was ready to suffer the penalty ; that, as I had not given notice of preaching again at the Cross, I should not preach again at that place, nor cause a disturbance any where. I charged the constable, a trembling submissive soul, to assure his worship that I reverenced him for his office' sake. The only place I could get to preach in was a cock-pit, and I expected Satan would come and fight me on his own ground. 'Squire Roberts, the justice's son, laboured hard to raise a mob, for which I was to be answerable ; but the very boys ran away from him, when the poor 'squire per¬ suaded them to go down to the cock-pit and cry fire. I called, in words then first heard in that place, ' Repent and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out.' God struck the hard rock, and the waters gushed out. Never have I seen a people more desirous of knowing the truth at the first hearing. I passed the evening in conference with Mr. Wardrobe. O that all our dissenting ministers were like-minded, then would all dissensions cease for ever ! November 28th, at six, we assembled again in our chapel, the cock-pit. I imagined myself in the Pantheon, or some Heathen temple, and almost scrupled preaching there at first; but we found ' the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof.' His presence consecrated the place. Never have I found a greater sense of God than while we were repeating his own prayer. I set before their eyes Christ crucified. The rocks were melted, and gracious tears flowed. We knew not how to part. I distributed some books among them, which they received with the utmost eagerness, begging me to come again, and to send our preachers to them." (Journal. 120 LIFE OF THE After preaching in various parts of Lincolnshire, and the midland counties, Mr. Charles Wesley returned to Lon¬ don : but soon, with unwearied spirit, in company with Mr. Minton, he set off for Bristol, taking Devizes by the way, where he had as narrow an escape for his life as his brother had experienced at Wednesbury. An account of these distinguished ministers of Christ would be imperfect with¬ out a particular notice of a few of their greatest perils. They show the wretched state of that country which they were the appointed instruments of raising into a higher moral and civil condition, and they illustrate their own character. Each of the brothers might truly say with an Apostle, and his coadjutors, "We have not received the spirit of fear, but of power, (courage,) of love, and of a sound mind." They felt, too, that they had "received" it; for, with them, " boasting was excluded" by that " law of faith" which led them in all things to trust in and to glorify God. The account is taken from Mr. Charles Wesley's Journal. The Devizes mob had this peculiarity, that it was led on not only by the curate, but by two Dis¬ senters ! thus "Herod and Pilate were made friends:"— "February 25th,—a day never to be forgotten. At seven o'clock I walked quietly to Mrs. Philips's, and began preaching a little before the time appointed. For three quarters of an hour, I invited a few listening sinners to Christ. Soon after, Satan's whole army assaulted the house. We sat in a little ground-room, and ordered all the doors to be thrown open. They brought a hand engine and began to play into the house. We kept our seats, and they rushed into the passage ; just then, Mr. Borough, the constable, came, and seizing the spout of the engine, carried it off. They swore if he did not deliver it they would pull down the house. At that time they might have taken us prisoners ; we were close to them, and none to interpose ; but they hurried out to fetch the larger engine. In the meantime, we were advised to send for the mayor; but Mr. Mayor was gone out of town, in the sight of the people, which gave great encouragement to those who were already wrought up to a proper pitch by the curate, and the gentlemen of the town, particularly Mr. Sutton and Mr. Willy, Dissenters, the two leading men. Mr. Sut¬ ton frequently came out to the mob to keep up their spirits REV. JOHN WESLEY. 121 He sent word to Mrs. Philips, that if she did not turn that fellow out to the mob, he would send them to drag him out. Mr. Willy passed by again and again, assuring the rioters he would stand by them, and secure them from the law, do what they would. " The rioters now began playing the larger engine, which broke the windows, flooded the rooms, and spoiled the goods. We were withdrawn to a small upper room in the back part of the house, seeing no way to escape their violence, as they seemed under the full power of the old murderer. They first laid hold on the man who kept the society house, dragged him away, and threw him into the horse pond, and, it was said, broke his back. We gave ourselves unto prayer, believing the Lord would de¬ liver us ; how, or when, we saw not, nor any possible way of escaping; we therefore stood still to see the salva¬ tion of God. Every now and then some or other of our friends would venture to us, but rather weakened our hands, so that 'we were forced to stop our ears and look up. Among the rest, the mayor's maid came, and told us her mistress was in tears about me, and begged me to disguise myself in women's clothes, and try to make my escape. Her heart had been turned toward us by the conversion of her son, just on the brink of ruin. God laid his hand on the poor prodigal, and instead of running to sea, he entered the society. The rioters without continued playing their engine, which diverted them for some time; but their num¬ ber and fierceness still increased ; and the gentlemen sup¬ plied them with pitchers of ale, as much as they would drink. They were now on the point of breaking in, when Mr. Borough thought of reading the proclamation; he did so at the hazard of his life. In less than the hour, of above a thousand wild beasts, none were left but the guard. Our constable had applied to Mr. Street, the only justice in town, who would not act. We found there was no help in man, which drove us closer to the Lord ; and wo prayed with little intermission the whole day. " Our enemies at their return made their main assault at the back door, swearing horribly they would have me if it cost them their lives. Many seeming accidents con¬ curred to prevent their breaking in. The man of the house came home, and instead of turning me out, as they 11 122 LIFE OF THE expected, took part with us, and stemmed the tide for some time. They now got a notion that I had made my escape and ran down to the inn, and played the engine there. They forced the innkeeper to turn out our horses, which he immediately sent to Mr. Clark's, which drew the rabble and their engine thither. But the resolute old man charged and presented his gun till they retreated. Upon their revisiting us, we stood in jeopardy every moment. Such threatenings, curses, and blasphemies, I have never heard. They seemed kept out by a continual miracle. I remem¬ bered the Roman senators, sitting in the forum, when the Gauls broke in upon them, but thought there was a fitter posture for Christians, and told my companion they should take us off our knees. We were kept from all hurry and discomposure of spirit by a divine power resting upon us. We prayed and conversed as freely as if we had been in the midst of our brethren, and had great confidence that the Lord would either deliver us from the danger, or in it. In the height of the storm, just when we were falling into the hands of the drunken, enraged multitude, Mr. Minton was so little disturbed that he fell fast asleep. " They were now close to us on every side, and over our heads untiling the roof. A ruffian cried out, 'Here they are, behind the curtain.' At this time we fully expected their appearance, and retired to the furthermost corner of the room, and I said, ' This is the crisis.' In that moment, Jesus rebuked the winds and the sea, and there was a great calm. We heard not a breath without, and wondered what was become of them. The silence lasted for three quarters of an hour, before any one came near us; and we continued in mutual exhortation and prayer, looking for deliverance. I often told my compa¬ nions, ' Now God is at work for us ; he is contriving our escape ; he can turn these leopards into lambs ; can com¬ mand the Heathen to bring his children on their shoulders, and make our fiercest enemies the instruments' of our de¬ liverance.' About three o'clock Mr. Clark knocked at the door, and brought with him the persecuting constable. He said, ' Sir, if you will promise never to preach here again, the gentlemen and I will engage to bring you safe out o' town.' My answer was, ' I shall promise no such thing ; setting aside my office, I will not give up my birth-right, as REV. JOHN WESLEY. 123 an Englishman, of visiting what place I please of his majesty's dominions.' ' Sir,' said the constable, ' we ex¬ pect no such promise, that you will never come here again ; only tell me that it is not your present intention, that I may tell the gentlemen, who will then secure your quiet departure.' I answered, ' I cannot come again at this time, because I must return to London a week hence. But, observe, I make no promise of not preaching here when the door is opened; and do not you say that I do.' "He went away with this answer,.and we betook our¬ selves to prayer and thanksgiving. We perceived it was the Lord's doing, and it was marvellous in our eyes. The hearts of our adversaries were turned. Whether pity for us, or fear for themselves, wrought strongest, God know- eth; probably the latter, for the mob were wrought up to such a pitch of fury, that their masters dreaded the conse¬ quence, and therefore went about appeasing the multitude, and charging them not to touch us in our departure. " While the constable was gathering his posse, we got our things from Mr. Clark's, and prepared to go forth. The whole multitude were without, expecting us, and saluted us with a general shout. The man Mrs. Naylor had hired to ride before her was, as we now perceived, one of the rioters. This hopeful guide was to conduct us out of the reach of his fellows. Mr. Minton and I took horse in the face of our enemies, who began clamouring against us; the gentlemen were dispersed among the mob, to bridle them. We rode a slow pace up the street, the whole multitude pouring along on both sides, and attending us with loud acclamations. Such fierceness and diabolical malice 1 have not before seen in human faces. They ran up to our horses as if they would swallow us, but did not know which was Wesley. We felt great peace and acquiescence in the honour done us, while the whole town were specta¬ tors of our march. When out of sight we mended our pace, and about seven o'clock came to Wrexall. The news of our danger was got thither before us; but we brought the welcome tidings of our deliverance. We joined in hearty prayer to our Deliverer, singing the hymn, ' Worship, and thanks, and blessing,' &c. " February 26. I preached at Bath, and we rejoiced like 124 LIFE OF THE men who take the spoil. We continued our triumph ai Bristol, and reaped the fruit of our labours and sufferings." Amidst such storms, more or less violent, were the foun¬ dations of that work laid, the happy results of which tens of thousands now enjoy in peace. But even the piety which could hazard such labours and dangers for the sake of " seeking and saving the lostand the heroic devoted- ness which remained constant under them, has not been able to win the praise of prejudiced writers on the subject of Methodism. Dr. Southey {Life of Wesley) has little sympathy with the sufferings which a persecuted people were doomed in many places so callously to endure ; and he finds in the heroism of their leaders a subject of reproach and contempt, rather than of that admiration which, had they occupied some poetical position, he had doubtless expressed as forcibly and nobly as any man. Mr. Whitefield, he tells us, had " a great longing to be persecuted," though the quotation from one of his letters, on which he justifies the aspersion, shows nothing more than a noble defiance of suffering, should it occur in the course of what he esteemed his duty. Similar sarcasms have been cast by infidels upon all who, in every age, have suffered for the sake of Christ; and like those in which Dr. Southey has indulged, they were intended to darken the lustre of that patient courage which sprang out of love to the Saviour and the souls of men, by resolving it into spiritual pride, and a desire to render themselves conspicu¬ ous. Of John Nelson, one of Mr. Wesley's first lay coadjutors, who endured no ordinary share of oppression and suffering, as unprovoked and unmerited as the most modest and humble demeanour on his part could render it, Dr. Southey truly says, that "he had as high a spirit, and as brave a heart as ever Englishman was blessed with yet even the narration of his wrongs, so scandalous to the magistracy of the day, and which were sustained by him in the full, spirit of Christian constancy, is not dismissed without a sneer at this honest and suffering man himself.— "To prison therefore Nelson was taken, to his heart's con¬ tent." And so because he chose a prison rather than violate his conscience, and endured imprisonments and other injuries, with the unbending feeling of a high and noble mind, corrected and controlled by " the meekness REV. JOHN WESLEY. 125 and gentleness of Christ," imprisonment was his desire, and the distinction which he is supposed to have derived from it, his motive! Before criticism so flippant an J. cal¬ lous, no character, however sacred and revered, could stand. It might be applied with equal success to the per¬ secutions of the Apostles, and the first Christians them¬ selves ; to the confessors in the reign of Mary; and to the whole " noble army of martyrs." The real danger to which these excellent men were ex¬ posed is, however, concealed by Dr. Southey. White- field's fears, or rather hopes of persecution, he says, " were suited to the days of Queen Mary, Bishop Gardiner, and Bishop Bonner; they were ridiculous or disgusting in the time of George the Second, Archbishop Potter, and Bishop Gibson." This is said because Mr. Whitefield thought that be might probably be called to " resist unto blood;" and our author would have it supposed, that all this was "safe boasting," in the reign of George the Se¬ cond, and whilst the English Church had its Archbishop Potter and its Bishop Gibson. But not even in the early part of the reign of George the Third, and with other bishops in the Church as excellent as Potter and Gibson, was the anticipation groundless. The real danger was in fact so great from the brutality of the populace, the igno¬ rance and supineness of the magistrates, and the mob- exciting activity of the clergy, one of whom was usually the instigator of every tumult, that every man who went forth on the errand of mercy in that day took his life in his hand, and needed the spirit of a martyr, though he was not in danger of suffering a martyr's death by regular civil or ecclesiastical process. Dr. Southey has himself in part furnished the confutation of his own suggestion, that little danger was to be apprehended, by the brief statements he has given of the hair-breadth escapes of the Wesleys, and of the sufferings of John Nelson. But a volume might be filled with accounts of outrages committed from that day to our own, in different places, (for they now occasionally occur in obscure and unenlightened parts of the country,) upon the persons of Methodist preachers, for the sole fault of visiting neglected places, and preaching the Gospel of salvation to those who, if Christianity be true, are in a state of spiritual darkness and danger. To be pelted with 11* 126 LIFE OF THE stones, dragged through ponds, beaten with bludgeons, rolled in mud, and to sutler other modes of ill treatment, was the anticipation of all the first preachers when they entered upon their work; and this was also the lot of many of their hearers. Some lives were lost, and many shorten¬ ed ; the most singular escapes are on record ; and if the tragedy was not deeper, that was owing at length to the ex¬ plicit declarations of George III. on the subject of tolera¬ tion, and the upright conduct of the judges in their circuits, and in the higher courts, when an appeal was made to the laws in some of the most atrocious cases. Assuredly, the country magistrates in general, and the clergy, were en¬ titled to little share of the praise. Much of this is acknow¬ ledged by Dr. Southey ; but he attempts to throw a part of the blame upon the Wesleys themselves. " Their doc¬ trines of perfection and assurance" were, he thinks, among the causes of their persecution; and "their zeal was not tempered with discretion." With discretion, in his view of it, their zeal was not tempered. Such discretion'would neither have put them in the way of persecution, nor brought it upon them ; it would have disturbed no sinner and saved no soul; but they were not indiscreet in seek¬ ing danger, and provoking language never .escaped lips in which the law of meekness always triumphed : and as for doctrines, the mobs and their exciters were then just as discriminating as mobs have ever been from the beginning of the world. They were usually stirred up by the clergy, and other persons of influence in the neighbourhood, who were almost as ignorant as the ruffians they employed to assault the preachers and their peaceable congregations. The description of the mob at Ephesus, in the Acts of the Apostles, suited them as well as if they had been the origi¬ nal and not the copy,—" Some cried one thing, and some another ; for the assembly was confused ; and the most part knew not wherefore they were come together." They generally, however, agreed to pull down the preacher, and to abuse both him and his hearers, men, women, and even children ; and that because " they troubled them about religion." That immediate resort to God in prayer, which was practised, in cases of " peril and danger," by these perse¬ cuted ministers; and their ascription of deliverances to REV. JOHN WESLEY. 127 the divine interposition, as in the instances above given, have also been subjects of either grave rebuke, or semi- infidel ridicule. It is not necessary to contend that every particular instance which, in the Journals of the Wesleys, is referred to an immediate answer to prayer, was so in reality; because a few cases may reasonably appear doubtful. These, however, only prove that they culti¬ vated the habit of regarding God in all things, and of gratefully acknowledging his hand in all the events of life; and if there was at any time any over application of these excellent views and feelings, yet in minds so sober as to make the word of God, diligently studied, their only guide in all matters of practice, no injurious result could follow. But we must reject the Bible altogether, if we shut out a particular providence ; and we reduce prayer to a real absurdity, unless we allow that its very grpund and reason is special interposition. Why, for instance, should a Col¬ lect teach us to pray that " this day we may fall into no sin, neither run into any kind of danger," if we do not thereby place ourselves under a special protection of God, and if our interests must necessarily be dragged after the wheel of some general system of government! Divine interposition is indeed ordinarily invisible, and can be known only from general results; it impresses no mark of interruption or of quickened activity upon the general courses of things with which we may be surrounded; it works often unconsciously through our own faculties, and through the wills and purposes of others, as unconscious of it as we ourselves; yet even in this case, where the indevout see man only, the better instructed acknowledge God who " worketh all in all." But to say that the hand of God is never specially marked in its operations ; that his servants who are raised up by him for important services shall never receive proofs of his particular care ; that an entire trust in him in the most critical circumstances shall have no visible honour put upon it; that when we are " in all things" commanded to make our requests known unto God, the prayers which, in obedience to that command, we offer to him in the time of trouble shall never have a special answer, is to maintain notions wholly subversive of piety, and which cannot be held without rejecting, or reducing to unrpeaningness, many of the 128 life of the most explicit and important declarations of Holy Scripture. These were not the views entertained by the Wesleys; and in their higher belief they coincided with good men in all agbs. They felt that they were about fheir Master's business, and they trusted in their Master's care, so long as it might be for his glory that they should be permitted to live. Nor for that were they anxious ; desiring only, that whilst they lived they should " live unto the Lord," and that when they died " they should die to him and that so " Christ might be magnified in their body whether by life, or by death." The labours of Mr. John Wesley, during the same period of two years, may be abridged from his Journal. In the first month of the year 1745, we find him at Lon¬ don, and at Bristol and its neighbourhood. In February, he made a journey, in the stormy and wintry weather of that season, to Newcastle, preaching at various interme¬ diate places. The following extract shows the cheerful and buoyant spirit with which he encountered these dif¬ ficulties :— " Many a rough journey have I had before; but one like this I never had, between wind and hail, and rain and ice, and snow, and driving sleet, and piercing cold. But it is past. Those days will return no more, and are there¬ fore as though they had never been. '"Pain, disappointment, sickness, strife, Whate'ermolests or troubles life; However grievous in its stay, It shakes the tenement of clay, When past, as nothing we esteem-, And pain, like pleasure, is a dream.'" (Journal.) As a specimen of that cool and self-possessed manner which gave him so great a power over rude minds, wc may take the following anecdote. A man at Newcastle had signalized himself by personal insults offered to him in the streets ; and, upon inquiry, he found him an old offender in persecuting the members of the society by abusing and throwing stones at them. Upon this he sent him the following note :— " Robert Young,—I expect to see you, between this and Friday, and to hear from you, that you are sensible of your fault. Otherwise, in pity to your soul, I shall be rev. john wesley. 129 obliged to inform the magistrates of your assaulting me yesterday in the street. ' I am your real friend, "John Wesley. Within two or three hours, Robert Young came, and promised a quite different behaviour. So did this gentle reproof, if not save a soul from death, yet prevent a multi¬ tude of sins." (Journal.) Whilst at Newcastle, he drew up the following case:— "Newcastle-upon-Tyne, March 11, 1745-6. " I have been drawing up this morning a short state of the case between the clergy and us : I leave you to make any such use of it as you believe will be to the glory of God. " 1. About seven years since we began preaching inward, present salvation, as attainable by faith alone. "2. For preaching this doctrine we were forbidden to preach in the churches. "3. We then preached in private houses, as occasion offered ; and when the houses could not contain the people, in the open air. " 4. For this many of the clergy preached or printed against us, as both heretics and schismatics. " 5. Persons who were convinced of sin, begged us to advise them more particularly, how to flee from the wrath to come. We replied, if they would all come at one time (for they were numerous) we would endeavour it. "6. For this we were represented, both from the pulpit and the press, (we have heard it with our ears, and seen it with our eyes,) as introducing Popery, raising sedition, practising Loth against Church and State : and all manner of evil was publicly said both of us and those who were accustomed to meet with us. " 7. Finding some truth herein, viz. that some of those who so met together, walked disorderly, we immediately desired them not to come to us any more. " 8. And the more steady were desired to overlook the rest, that we might know if they walked according to the Gospel. " 9. But now several of the bishops began to speak against us, either in conversation or in public. " 10. On this encouragement several of the clergy stir¬ red up the people to treat us as outlaws or mad dogs. 130 LIFE OF THE "11. The people did so, both in Staffordshire, Corn¬ wall, and many other places. " 12. And they do still, wherever they are not restrain¬ ed by their fear of the secular magistrate. " Thus the case stands at present. Now what can we do, or what can you our brethren do toward healing this breach ? which is highly desirable ; that we may withstand with joint force, the still increasing flood of Popery, Deism, and immorality. " Desire of us any thing we can do with a safe con¬ science, and we will do it immediately. Will you meet us here ? Will you do what we desire of you, so far as you can with a safe conscience ? " Let us come to particulars. Do you desire us, 1. To preach another, or to desist from preaching this, doctrine ? " We think you do not desire it, as knowing we cannot do this with a safe conscience. " Do you desire us, 2. To desist from preaching in pri¬ vate houses, or in the open air ? As things are now cir¬ cumstanced, this would be the same as desiring us not to preach at all. " Do you desire us, 3. To desist from advising those who now meet together for that purpose? or, in other words, to dissolve our societies ? "We cannot do this with a safe conscience: for we apprehend many souls would be lost thereby, and that God would require their blood at our hands. " Do you desire us, 4. To advise them only one by one ? "This is impossible, because of their number. " Do you desire us, 5. To suffer those who walk disor¬ derly still to mix with the rest ? "Neither can we do this with a safe conscience; be¬ cause evil communications corrupt good manners. " Do you desire us, 6. To discharge those leaders of bands or classes (as we term them) who overlook the rest ? " This is in effect, to suffer the disorderly walkers still to mix with the rest, which we dare not do. "Do you desire us, lastly, to behave with reverence toward those who are overseers • of the church of God ? and with tenderness, both to the charactei and persons of our brethren, the inferior clergy? " By the grace of God, we can and will do this. Yea, REV. JOHN WESLEY. 131 our conscience beareth us witness, that we have already laboured so to do ; and that, at all times and in all places. " If you ask, what we desire of you to do, we answer, 1. We do not desire any of you to let us preach in your churches, either if you believe us to preach false doctrine, or if you have, upon any other ground, the least scruple concerning it. But we desire that any who believes us to preach true doctrine, and has no scruple at all in this mat¬ ter, may not be either publicly or privately discouraged from inviting us to preach in his church. "2. We do not desire that any one who thinks that we are heretics or schismatics, and that it is his duty to preach or print against us as such, should refrain therefrom, so long as he thinks it his duty (although in this case the breach can never be healed.) " But we desire, that none will pass such a sentence, until he has calmly considered both sides of the question; that he would not condemn us unheard, but first read what we have written, and pray earnestly that God may direct him in the right way. "3. We do. not desire any favour, if either Popery, sedi¬ tion, or immorality be proved against us. " But we desire, you will not credit, without proof, any of those senseless tales that pass current with the vulgar; that, if you do not credit them yourselves, you will not relate them to others ; (which we have known done ;) yea, that you will confute them, so far as ye have oppor¬ tunity, and discountenance those who still retail them abroad. "4. We do not desire any preferment, favour or recom¬ mendation from those that are in authority, either in Church or State. But we desire, " 1. That if any thing material be laid to our charge, we may be permitted to answer for ourselves. 2. That you would hinder your dependents from stirring up the rabble against us, who are certainly not the proper judges of these matters ; and 3. That you would effectually sup¬ press, and thoroughly discountenance, all riots and popular insurrections, which evidently strike at the foundation of all government, whether of Church or State. "Now these things you certainly can do, and that with a safe conscience ; therefore, until these things are done, 132 LIFE OF THE the continuance of the breach is chargeable on you and you only." (Works, vol. iii, pp. 329-331.) It is evident from this paper, that Mr. Wesley's difficul¬ ties, arising from his having raised up a distinct people, within the national Church, pressed upon him. He desired union and cooperation with the clergy, but his hope was. disappointed; and perhaps it was much more than he could reasonably indulge. It shows, however, his own sincerity, and that he was not only led into his course of irregularity, but impelled forward in it, by circumstances which his zeal and piety had created, and which all his prejudices in favour of the Church could not control. After spending some time in Newcastle and the neigh¬ bouring places, he visited Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, Lan¬ cashire, and Cheshire. On his return southward, he called at Wednesbury, long the scene of riot, and preached in peace. At Birmingham he had to abide the pelting of stones and dirt; and, on his return to London, he found some of the society inclined to Quakerism : but by read¬ ing " Barclay's Apology" over with them, and commenting upon it, they were recovered. Antinomianism, both of Mystic and Calvinistic origin, also gave him trouble ; but his testimony against it was unsparing. To erroneous opinions, when innocent, no man was more tender; but when they infected the conduct, they met from him the sternest resistance. " I would wish all to observe, that the points in question between us and either the German or English Antinomians are not points of opinion, but of practice. We break with no man for his opinion. We think and let think." (Journal.) In the summer he proceeded to Cornwall, where Dr. Borlase, the historian of that county, in the plenitude of his magisterial authority, still carried on a systematic persecu¬ tion against the Methodists. He had made out an order for Mr. Maxfield, who had been preaching in various places, to be sent on board a man of war, but the captain would not take him. A pious and peaceable miner, with a wife and seven children, was also apprehended under the Doctor's warrant, because he had said " that he knew his sins forgivenand this zealous anti-heretic finally made out a warrant against Mr. Wesley himself, but could find no one to execute it. From Cornwall, where his ministry REV, JOHN WESLEY. 133 had been attended with great effect, Mr. Wesley proceeded to Wales, and thence to Bristol. Count Zinzendorf, about this time, directed the publica¬ tion of an advertisement, declaring that he and his people had no connection with John and Charles Wesley; and concluded with a prophecy, that they would " soon run their heads against a wall." On this Mr. Wesley contents himself with coolly remarking, " We will not, if we can help it." He now proceeded northward; and at Northampton called on Dr. Doddridge, from whom he had previously received several letters, breathing the most catholic spirit. At Leeds the mob pelted him and the congregation with dirt and stones; and the next evening, being " in higher excitement, they were ready," says he, " to knock out our brains for joy that tho Duke of Tuscany was emperor." On his arrival at Newcastle, the town was in the utmost consternation, news having arrived that the Pretender had entered Edinburgh. By the most earnest preaching, he endeavoured to turn this season of alarm to the spiritual profit of the people, and the large congregations whom he addressed in the streets heard with solemn attention. He then visited Epworth, but speedily returned to Newcastle, judging probably, that the place of anxiety and danger was his post of duty. Here he made an offer to the general, through one of the aldermen, to preach to the troops en¬ camped near the town, whose dissolute language and man¬ ners greatly affected him ; but he seems to have received no favourable answer: so, after preaching a few times near the camp, he returned southwards, endeavouring, at Leeds, Birmingham, and other places, to turn the public agitation, arising from the apprehension of civil war, to the best ac¬ count, by enforcing " repentance toward God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ." Mr. Wesley had occasionally employed himself in writ¬ ing and getting printed small religious tracts, many thou¬ sands of which were distributed. This was revived with vigour on his return to London this year ; and he thus, by his example, was probably the first to apply, on any large scale, this important- means of usefulness to the reforma¬ tion of the people. In the form of those excellent institu¬ tions called " Tract Societies," the same plan has now long 12 134 LIFE OF THE been carried on systematically, to the great spiritual advan¬ tage of many thousands. At this period he observes, ad¬ verting to the numerous small tracts he had written and distributed, " It pleased God hereby to provoke others to jealousy; insomuch that the lord mayor had ordered a large quantity of papers, dissuading from cursing and swearing, to be printed, and distributed to the train-bands. And this day, an ' Earnest Exhortation to Serious Repent¬ ance' was given at every church door in or near London, to every person who came out, and one left at the house of every householder who was absent from church. I doubt not but God gave a blessing therewith."* In the early part of 1746, we find the following entry in Mr. Wesley's Journal:—" I set out for Bristol. On the road I read over Lord King's account of the Primitive Church. In spite of the vehement prejudice of my educa¬ tion, I was ready to believe that this was a fair and impar¬ tial draught. But if so, it would follow, that Bishops and Presbyters are (essentially) of one order; and that origin ally every Christian congregation was a church indepen¬ dent on all others!" The truth is, that Lord King came in only to confirm him in views which he had for some time begun to enter¬ tain ; and they were such as show, that though he was a Church of England man as to affection, which was strong and sincere as far as its doctrines and its liturgy were con¬ cerned, and though he regarded it with great deference as * Journal.—Previous to this, we find him a tract writer and distri¬ butor; for he observes in the year 1742, "I set out for Brentford with Robert Swindels. The next day we reached Marlborough. When one in the room beneath us was swearing desperately, Mr. Swindels stepped down, and put into his hand the paper entitled Swear not at all. He thanked him, and promised to swear no more. And he did not while he was in the house." Mr. Wesley had already written tracts entitled, "A Word to a Smuggler," "AWordto a Sabbath breaker," " A Word to a Swearer," " A Word to a Drunkard," " A Word to a Street-walker," "AWord to a Malefactor," and several others. He published these that his preachers and people might have them to give away to those who were guilty of these crimes, or in danger of falling into them. He considered this as one great means of spreading the knowledge of God. He also early gave his influence to the Sunday school system. Mr. Raikes began his Sunday school in Gloucester in 1784; and in January, 1785, Mr. Wesley published an account of it in his Magazine, and exhorted his societies to imitate that laudable example. REV-. JOHN WESLEY. 135 a legal institution, yet in respect of its ecclesiastical polity he was even then very free in his opinions. At the second conference in 1745, it was asked, " Is Episcopal, Presby¬ terian, or Independent church government, most agreeable to reason 1" The answer is as follows :— " The plain origin of church government seems to be this :—Christ sends forth a person to preach the Gospel: some of those who hear him, repent and believe in Christ: they then desire him to watch over them, to build them up in faith, and to guide their souls into paths of righteousness. Here then is an independent congregation, subject to no pastor, but their own; neither liable to be controlled, in things spiritual, by any other man, or body of men whatso¬ ever. But soon after, some from other parts, who were occasionally present whilst he was speaking in the name of the Lord, beseech him to come over and help them also. He complies, yet not till he confers with the wisest and holiest of his congregation; and with their consent appoints one who has gifts and grace to watch over his flock in his absence. If it please God to raise another flock, in the new place, before he leaves them, he does the same thing, appointing one whom God hath fitted for the work to watch over these souls also. In like manner, in every place where it pleases God to gather a little flock by his word, he ap¬ points one in his absence, to take the oversight of the rest, to assist them as of the ability which God giveth. " These are deacons, or servants of the church, and they look upon their first pastor, as the common father of all these congregations, and regard him in the same light, and esteem him still as the shepherd of their souls. These congregations are not strictly independent, as they depend upon one pastor, though not upon each other. " As these congregations increase, and the deacons grow in years and grace, they need other subordinate deacons, or helpers, in respect of whom they may be called presbyters or elders, as their father in the Lord may be called the bishop or overseer of them all."* [* It was in this relation, and from pressing necessity in circum¬ stances of extreme emergency, that Mr. Wesley, assisted by other presbyters, ordained Dr. Coke, and through him Mr. Asbury, as superintendents, or bishops, of the American Methodist Churches.— American Eimt.] 336 LIFE OF THE This passage is important as it shows that from the first he regarded his preachers, when called out and devoted to the work, as, in respect of primitive antiquity and the universal Church, parallel to deacons and presbyters. He also then thought himself a Scriptural bishop. Lord King's researches into antiquity served to confirm these sentiments, and corrected his former notion as to a dis¬ tinction of orders. It should here be stated, that at these early conferences one sitting appears to have been devoted to conversation on matters of discipline, in which the propriety of Mr. Wesley's proceedings in forming societies, calling out preachers, and originating a distinct religious community, governed by its own laws, were considered; and this neces¬ sarily led to the examination of general questions of church government and order. This will explain the reason why in the conferences which Mr. Wesley, his brother, two or three clergymen, and a few preachers held in the years 1744, 1745, 1746, and 1747, such subjects were discussed as are contained in the above extract and in those which follow. On these, as on all others, they set out with the principle of examining every thing " to the foundation." " Q. Can he be a spiritual governor of the church who is not a believer, not a member of it 1 " A. It seems not; though he may be a governor in out¬ ward things, by a power derived from the king. " Q. What are properly the laws of the Church of Eng¬ land 1 " A. The Rubrics : and to these we submit, as the ordi¬ nance of men, for the Lord's sake. " Q. But is not the will of our governors a law 1 "A. No; not of any governor, temporal or spiritual; therefore if any bishop wills that I should not preach the Gospel, his will is no law to me. " Q. But if he produce a law against your preaching 1 " A. I am to obey God rather than man." " Q. Is mutual consent absolutely necessary between the pastor and his flock 1 " A. No question. I cannot guide any soul, unless he consent to be guided by me; neither can any soul force ma to guide him, if I consent not. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 137 " Q. Does the ceasing of this consent on either side dissolve this relation ? " A. It must in the very nature of things. If a man no longer consent to be guided by me, I am no longer his guide ; I am free. If one will not guide me any longer, I am free to seek one who will." " Q. Does a church in the New Testament always mean a single congregation ? " A. We believe it does; we do not recollect any instance to the contrary. " Q. What instance or ground is there then in the New Testament for a National Church ? "A. We know none at all; we apprehend it to be a merely political institution. " Q. Are the three orders of bishops, priests, and deacons plainly described in the New Testament? "A. We think they are, and believe they generally obtained in the church of the Apostolic age. " Q. But are you assured that God designed the same plan should obtain in all churches, throughout all ages ? " A. We are not assured of it, because we do not know it is asserted in Holy Writ. " Q. If the plan were essential to a Christian church, what must become of all foreign Reformed Churches ? " A. It would follow they are no part of the church of Christ: a consequence full of shocking absurdity. " Q. In what age was the divine right of Episcopacy first asserted in England ? " A. About, the middle of Queen Elizabeth's reign : till then all the bishops and clergy in England continually allowed and joined in the ministrations of those who were not episcopally ordained. " Q. Must there not be numberless accidental variations in the government of various churches ? A. There must, in the nature of things. As God variously dispenses his gifts of nature, providence, and grace, both the offices themselves, and the officers in each, ought to be varied from time to time. " Q. Why is it that there is no determinate plan of church government appointed in Scripture? 12* 138 LIFE OF THE " A. Without doubt because the wisdom of God had a regard to that necessary variety. " Q. Was there any thought of uniformity in the govern¬ ment of all churches, until the time of Constantine 1 " A. It is certain there was not, nor would there have been then had men consulted the word of God only." Nothing therefore can be more clear, than that Mr. Wesley laid the ground work of hi& future proceedings after much deliberation, at this early stage of his progress. He felt that a case of necessity Kad arisen, calling upon him to provide a ministry and a government for the people who had been raised up; a necessity which rested upon the obvious alternative, that they must either be furnished with pastors of their own, or be left without sufficient aid in the affairs of their souls. This led him closely to examine the whole matter; and he saw that when the authority of Scripture alone was referred to in matters of church arrangement and regulation, it enjoined no parti¬ cular form of administration as binding, but left the appli¬ cation of certain great and inviolable principles to the piety and prudence of those whom God might honour as the instruments of usefulness to the souls of men. Here he took his stand; and he proceeded to call forth preachers, and set them apart or ordain them* to the sacred office, and to * The act of setting apart ministers by Mr. Wesley, but without imposition of hands, is here called their ordination, although that term has not been generally in use among us; and may be objected to by those who domot consider that imposition of hands, however impres¬ sive as a form, and in most churches the uniform practice, is still but a circumstance, and cannot enter into the essence of ordination. That every religious society has the power to determine the mode in which " the separation" of its ministers " to the Gospel of God" shall be visibly notified and expressed, will only be questioned- by those whom preju¬ dice and a wretched bigotry have brought under their influence. What the body of Methodists now practise in this respect, will, however, be allowed to stand on clearer ground than the proceedings of Mr. Wes¬ ley, who still continued in communion with the Church. It has there¬ fore been generally supposed that Mr. Wesley did not consider his appointment of preachers without imposition of hands, as an ordina¬ tion to the ministry; but only as an irregular employment of laymen in the spiritual office of merely expounding the Scriptures in a case of moral necessity. This, however, is not correct. They were not appointed to expound or preach merely, but were solemnly set apart to the pastoral office, as the Minutes of the conferences show; nor were they regarded by him as laymen, except when in common par¬ lance they were distinguished from the clergy of the Church; in which REV. JOHN WESLEV. 139 enlarge the work by their means, under the full conviction of his acting under as clear a Scriptural authority as could be pleaded by Churchmen for Episcopacy, by the Presby¬ terians for Presbytery, or by the Congregationalists for Independency. Still he did not go beyond the necessity. He could make this Scriptural appointment of ministers and ordinances, without renouncing communion with the Na¬ tional Church, and therefore he did not renounce it. In tnese views Charles Wesley too, who was at every one of the early conferences, concurred with him ; and if he thought somewhat differently on these points afterward, it was Charles who departed from first principles, not John. So much for the accuracy of Dr. Whitehead, who con¬ structed his Life of the two brothers upon just the opposite opinion! . case he would have called any dissenting minister a layman. The first extract from the Minutes of the conferences above given, suffi¬ ciently shows that as to the church of Christ at large, and as to his own societies, he regarded the preachers when fully devoted to the work, not as laymen, but as spiritual men, and ministers; men, as he says, " moved by ^he Holy Ghost," to preach the Gospel, and who after trial were ordained to that and other branches of the pastoral office. In his sketch of the origin of church government in that extract, he clearly had in view the conformity between what had taken place in his own case, and that which must, in a great number of instances, have occurred in the earliest periods of Christianity; and whilst he evi¬ dently refers to himself as the father and bishop of the whole of the socie¬ ties, ne tacitly compares his "assistants" to the ancient "presbyters," and his "helpers" to the ancient " deacons." In point of fact, so fully did he consider himself even in 1747, (whether consistently or not as a Churchman, let others determine, I speak only to the fact,) as setting apart or ordaining to the ministry, that he appears to have had thoughts of adding imposition of hands to his usual mode of ordination, which was preceded by fasting and" private prayer, and consisted of public examination, prayer, and appointment ,• and he only declines this for prudential reasons. "Why," says he, "do we not use more form in receiving a new labourer ? 1. Because there is something of stateliness in it, and we would be little and inconsiderable. 2. Because we would not make haste: we desire barely to follow Providence as it gradually opens." {Minutes of 1747.) Even this form therefore was regarded as what might, in other circumstances be required. The bearing of these remarks upon rome future ordinations of Mr. Wesley by imposition of hands, will be pointed out in its proper place.* [* Among the American Methodists, ordination, by imposition of hands, has been uniformly practised from the time of the organization of the Methodist Epis¬ copal Church in the year 1784. Our forms of ordination were prepared by Mr. Wesley himself) and are substantially the same as those used in the Church of England, and the Protestant Episcopal Church in this country.—Amebic an Edit.] 140 LIFE OF THE The discipline which Mr. Wesley maintained in the societies, was lenient and long-suffering; but where there was an evil at the root, he had an unsparing hand. In March, 1746, he came to Nottingham, and observes, "I had long doubted what it was which hindered the work of God here. But upon inquiry the case was plain. So many of the society were either triflers, or disorderly walkers, that the blessing of God could not rest upon them. So. I made short work by cutting off all such at a stroke, and leaving only that little handful, who, as far as could be judged, were really in earnest to save their souls." At Wednesbury and Birmingham he found that some Antinomian teachers, the offspring of that seed which be¬ fore the recent revival of religion had been sown in various parts of the country, and who, in that concern about spirit¬ ual things which now prevailed, began more zealously to bestir themselves to mislead and destroy the souls of men, under pretence of preaching a purer Gospel, had troubled the societies. By personal conversation with some of these teachers, in the presence of the people, he drew out the odious extent to which they carried their notions of "Chris¬ tian liberty and thus took an effectual method of expos¬ ing and confuting the deadly error. Upon his return to London, it appeared that certain pretended prophets had appeared in the metropolis, and had excited the attention of many. He gratified his curiosity by going to visit one of them, and with good humoured sarcasm observes, that as " he aimed at talking Latin and could not, he plainly showed that he did not understand his own calling." Sober Scotland has in our own day exhibited a similar fanaticism; and the gift of tongues, pretended by some persons there, appears to have proved quite as un¬ satisfactory an evidence of a divine commission, as in this case. In visiting Newgate he found a penitent and hopeful malefactor; and his Journal affords a specimen of that originality of remark, which peculiar cases, often perplex¬ ing to others, called forth from him. " A real, deep work of God seemed to be already begun in his soul. Perhaps by driving him too fast, Satan has driven him to God ; to that repentance, which shall never be repented of." When he subsequently visited Dr. Dodd under condemnation, he is reported to have replied to his apologies for receiving him REV. JOHN WESLEY. 141 iti the condemned cell, " Courage, brother; perhaps God saw that nothing else would do." Bristol, Wales, Devonshire, and Cornwall, occupied Mr. Wesley's attention during the summer of 1746, and London, Bristol, and the places adjacent, for the remainder of the year. About this time also he received various letters from the army abroad, giving an account of the progress of religion among the soldiers, and of the brave demeanour in battle of many of their Methodist comrades. These accounts appear to have given him great satisfac¬ tion ; as showing the power of religion in new circum¬ stances, and as affording him an answer to his enemies, who asserted that his doctrines had the effect of making men dastardly, negligent of duty, and disloyal. In the early part of the year 1747, we find him braving the snows of February in Lincolnshire; and in March he reached Newcastle, to supply the absence of his brother from that important station. Among other excellencies possessed by this great man, he was fond of smoothing the path of knowledge, to the diffusion of which he devoted much attention, and for which end he published several compendiums and brief treatises on its most important branches. In this respect also he was foremost to tread in a path which has been of late years vigorously pursued, and must be reckoned as one of the leaders of that class of wise and benevolent men, who have exerted themselves to extend the benefits of use¬ ful information from the privileged orders of society, into the middle and lower classes. " This week," says he, " I read over with some young men, a Compendium of Rheto¬ ric, and a System of Ethics. I see not why a man of tolerable understanding may not in six months' time, learn more of solid philosophy than is commonly learned at Ox¬ ford in four (perhaps seven) years." On his return from his labours in the north of England, he called at Manchester, which he had formerly several times visited in order to take counsel with his college friend Clayton, and Dr. Byrom, and had preached in the churches. He was now seen there in a new character. The small house which was occupied by the society could not contain a tenth part of the people, and he therefore walked to Sal- ford Cross. " A numberless crowd of people partly ran 142 LIFE OF THE before, partly followed after me. I thought it best not to sing, but looking round, asked abruptly, 4 Why do you look as if you had never seen me before 1 Many of you have seen me in the neighbouring church, both preaching and administering the sacrament.' I then gave out the text, Seek ye the Lord while he may be found; call upon him while he is near. None interrupted at all, or made any disturbance, till, as I was drawing to a conclusion, a big man thrust in, with three or four more, and bade them bring out the engine.' Our friends desired me to remove into a yard just by, which I did, and concluded in peace." From the north he proceeded through Nottingham and Staffordshire to London, and from thence to the west of England. The influence which his calm courage often gave him over mobs was remarkably shown on this jour¬ ney. " Within two miles of Plymouth, one overtook and informed us, that the night before, all the Dock was in an uproar; and that a constable endeavouring to keep the peace, was beaten and much hurt. As we were entering the Dock, one met us, and desired we would go the back way. ' For,' said he, ' there are thousands of people wait¬ ing about Mr. Hyde's door.' We rode up straight into the midst of them. They saluted us with three huzzas ; after which I alighted, took several of them by the hand, and began to talk with them. I would gladly have passed an hour among them, and believe if I had, there had been an end of the riot; but the day being far spent (for it was past nine o'clock) I was persuaded to go in. The mob then recovered their spirits, and fought valiantly with the doors and windows. But about ten they were weary, and went every man to his own home. The next day I preached at four, and then spoke severally to a part of the society. About six in the evening I went to the place where I preached the last year. A little before we had ended the hymn came a lieutenant, a famous man, with his retinue of soldiers, drummers, and mob. When the drums ceased, a gentleman-barber began to speak; but his voice was quickly drowned in the shouts of the multitude, who grew fiercer and fiercer as their numbers increased. After wait¬ ing about a quarter of an hour, perceiving the violence of the rabble still increasing, I walked down into the thickest of them, and took the captain of the mob by the hand. He REV. JOHN WESLEY. 143 immediately said, ' Sir, I will see you safe home. Sir, no man shall touch you. Gentlemen, stand off. Give back. I will knock the first man down that touches him.' We walked on in great peace ; my conductor every now and then stretching out his neck, (he was a very tall man,) and looking round, to see if any behaved rudely, till we came to Mr. Hyde's door. We then parted in much love. I stayed in the street near half an hour after he was gone, talking with the people, who had now forgot their anger, and went away in high good humour." In Cornwall we have a specimen of his prompt and faithful habits of discipline. " Wednesday 8 : I preached at St. Ives, then at Sithney. On Thursday the stewards of all the societies met. I now diligently inquired, what exhorters there were in each society? Whether they had gifts meet for the work? Whether their lives were eminently holy ? And whether there appeared any fruit of their labour ? I found upon the whole, 1. That there were no fewer than eighteen exhort¬ ers in the county: 2. That three of these had no gifts at all for the work, neither natural, nor supernatural: 3. That a fourth had neither gifts nor grace, but was a dull, empty, self-conceited man: 4. That a fifth had considerable gifts, but had evidently made shipwreck of the grace of God. These therefore I determined immediately to set aside, and advise our societies not to hear them. 5. That J. B., A. L., and J. W., had gifts and grace, and had been much blessed in the work. Lastly, That the rest might be helpful when there was no preacher, in their own or the neighbouring societies, provided they would take no step without the advice of those who had more experience than themselves." In August he visited Ireland for the first time. Method¬ ism had been introduced into Dublin by Mr. Williams, one of the preachers, whose ministry had been attended with great success, so that a considerable society had been already formed. Mr. Wesley was allowed to preach once at St. Mary's, " to as gay and senseless a congregation," he observes, " as I ever saw." This was not, however, permitted a second time; and he occupied the spacious yard of the meeting house, both in the mornings and evenings, preaching to large congregations of both poor and rich. Among his hearers he had also the ministers of various 144 I.IFE OF THE denominations. The state of the Catholics excited his peculiar sympathy; and as he could have little access to them by preaching, he published an address specially for their use. In his Journal he makes a remark on the reli¬ gious neglect of this class of our fellow subjects by Pro¬ testants, which contains a reproof, the force of which has, unhappily, extended to our own times:—"Nor is it any wonder, that those who are born Papists, generally live and die such; when the Protestants can find no better ways to convert them, than penal laws and acts of parlia¬ ment." The chief perplexities which Ireland has occa¬ sioned to the empire are to be traced to this neglect; and the dangers which have often sprung up to the state from that quarter, have been, and continue to be, its appropriate punishment. Mr. Wesley's visit, at this time, to Ireland was short; but he requested his brother to succeed him. Mr. Charles Wesley, therefore, accompanied by another preacher, Mr. Charles Perronet, one of the sons of the venerable vicar of Shoreham, arrived there in September. A persecution had broken out against the infant society in Dublin, and "the first news," says Mr. Charles Wesley, " we heard was, that the little flock stood fast in the storm of persecution, which arose as soon as my brother left them. The Popish mob broke open their room, and de¬ stroyed all before them. Some of them are sent to New- gatef others bailed. What will be the event we know not, till we see whether the grand jury will find the bill." He afterward states that the grand jury threw out the bill, and thus gave up the Methodists to the fury of a licentious mob. " God has called me to suffer affliction with his people. I began my ministry with, ' Comfort ye, comfort ye my people,' &c. I met the society and the Lord knit our hearts together in love stronger than death. We both wept and rejoiced for the consolation. God hath sent me, I trust, to confirm these souls, and to keep them together in the present distress." (Whitehead's Life.) Mr. Charles Wesley spent the winter in Dublin," being daily employed in preaching, and visiting the people. In February he made an excursion into the country, where a few preachers were already labouring, and, in some places, with great success. Thus was the first active and sys¬ tematic agency for the conversion of the neglected people rev. john wesley. 145 of Ireland commenced by the Methodists ; and, till of late years? it is greatly to be regretted that they were left to labour almost alone. From that time, however, not only was the spirit of religion revived in many Protestant parts of the country, and many Papists converted to the truth, but the itinerant plan, which was there adopted as in Eng¬ land, enabled the preachers to visit a great number of places where the Protestants were so few in numbers as not to be able to keep up regular worship, or to make head, when left to themselves, against Popish influence. A bar¬ rier was thus erected against the farther encroachments of Popery ; and the light was kept burning in districts where it would otherwise have been entirely extinguished. The influence of the Methodist societies, would, however, have been much more extensive, had not the large emigrations which have been almost constantly setting in from Ireland to America, borrte away a greater number of their mem¬ bers in proportion than those of any other community. Mr. Charles Wesley spent part of the year 1748 in Ireland, and preached in several of the chief towns, and especially at Cork, with great unction and success. CHAPTER IX. The notices of the journeys and labours of these inde¬ fatigable ministers of Christ, given in the preceding chap¬ ter, afford but a specimen of the manner in which the foundations of the Methodist Connection were carried out and firmly laid. Nor were the preachers under their direc¬ tion, though labouring in more limited districts of country, scarcely less laboriously employed. At this period one of them writes from Lancashire to Mr. Wesley :—" Many doors are opened for preaching in these parts, but can¬ not be supplied for want of preachers. I think some one should be sent to assist me, otherwise we shall lose ground. My circuit requires me to travel one hundred - and fifty miles in two weeks ; during which time I preach publicly thirty-four times, beside meeting the societies, visiting the sick, and transacting other affairs." (White¬ head's Life.) . ' Of the preachers some were engaged in business, ang preached at their leisure in their own neighbourhoods; 13 146 LIFE OF THE bat still, zealous for the salvation of men, they often took considerable journeys. Others gave themselves up, for a time, to more extended labours, and then settled: but the third class, who had become the regular "assistants" and " helpers" of Mr. Wesley, were devoted wholly to the work of the ministry ; and, after a period of probation, and a scrutiny into their character and talents at the annual conferences, were admitted, by solemn prayer, into what was called " full connection," which, as we have stated, was their, ordination. No provision was, however, made at this early period for their maintenance. They took neither " purse nor scrip ;" they cast themselves upon the providence of God, and the hospitality and kindness of the societies, and were by them, like the primitive preachers, "helped forward after a godly sort,"* on their journeys, to open new places, and to instruct those for whose souls " no man cared." It might be as truly said of them as of the first propagators of Christianity, they had " no certain dwelling place." Under the severity of labour, and the wretched accommodations to which they cheerfully sub¬ mitted, many a fine constitution was broken, and prema¬ ture death was often induced. The annual conferences have been mentioned; and that a correct view may be taken of the doctrines which at those meetings it was agreed should be taught in the societies, it will be necessary to go back to their com¬ mencement. At first every doctrine was fully sifted in successive " Conversations," and the great principles of a godly discipline were drawn out into special regulations, as circumstances appeared to require. After the body had acquired greater maturity, these doctrinal discussions became less frequent; a standard and a test being ulti¬ mately established in a select number of Mr. Wesley's doctrinal sermons, and in his "Notes on the New Testa¬ ment." The free and pious spirit in which these inquiries were entered into was strikingly marked at the first con¬ ferences, in the commencing exhortation:—" Let us all pray for a willingness to receive light, to know of every doctrine whether it be of God." The widest principle of * The want of a provision for their wives and families, in the early periods of Methodism, caused the loss of many eminent preachers, who were obliged to settle in independent congregations. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 147 Christian liberty was also laid down, as suited to the infant state of a society which was but just beginning to take its ground, and to assume the appearance of order. " Q. 3. How far does each of us agree to submit to the judgment of the majority 1 " A. In speculative things, each can only submit so far as his judgment shall be convinced; in every practical point, each will submit so far as he can, without wounding his conscience. " Q. 4. Can a Christian submit any farther than this to any man, or number of men, upon earth 1 " A. It is plain he cannot; either to bishop, convoca¬ tion, or general council. And this is that grand principle of private judgment on which all the Reformers at home and abroad proceeded: ' Every man must judge for him¬ self ; because every man must give an account of himself to God.' " (-Minutes.) Never, it may be affirmed, was the formation of any Christian society marked by the recognition of principles more liberal, or more fully in the spirit of the New Testa¬ ment. To some of the doctrinal conversations of the first con¬ ferences, it is necessary to refer, in order to mark those peculiarities of opinion which distinguish the Wesleyan Methodists. It is, however, proper to observe that the clergymen and others who thus assembled did not meet to draw up formal articles of faith.. They admitted those of the Church of England ; and their principal object was to ascertain how several of the doctrines relative to experi¬ mental Christianity, which they found stated in substance in those articles, and farther illustrated in the Homilies, were to be understood and explained. This light they sought from mutual discussion, in which every thing was brought to the standard of the word of inspired truth. Their first subject was justification, which they describe with great simplicity; not loading it with epithets, as in the systematic schools, nor perplexing it by verbal criticism. It is defined to be " pardon," or " reception into God's favoura view wb'.ch is amply supported by several explicit passages of Scripture, in which the terms, " par¬ don," " forgiveness," and " remission of sins," are used convertibly with the term "justification." To be " received 148 LIFE OF THE into God's favour," according to these Minutes, is neces- -sarily connected with the act of forgiveness, and is the immediate and inseparable consequence of that gracious procedure. The same may be said of adoption; which, in some theological schemes, is made to flow from regenera¬ tion, while the latter is held to commence previously to justification. In Mr. Wesley's views adoption, as being a relative change, is supposed to be necessarily involved in justification, or the pardon of sin ; and regeneration to flow from both, as an inward mor.al change arising from the powerful and efficacious work of the Holy Spirit who is in that moment given to believers.* To their definition of justification, the Minutes add, " It is such a state that, if we continue therein, we shall be finally savedthus making final salvation conditional, and justification a state which may be forfeited. All wilful sin was held to imply a casting away of vital faith, and thereby to bring a man under wrath and condemnation; " nor is it possible for him to have justifying faith again without previously re¬ penting." They also agree that faith is " the condition of justificationadding, as the proof, " for every one that believeth not is condemned, and every one who believes is justified." In Mr. Wesley's sermon on justification by faith, the office of faith in justifying is thus more largely set forth:— "Surely the difficulty of assenting to the proposition, that faith is the only condition of justification, must arise from nofunderstanding it. We mean thereby thus much, that it is the only thing, without which no one is justified; the only thing that is immediately, indispensably, absolute- lyrequisite in order to pardon. As on the one hand, though a man should have every thing else, without faith, yet he cannot be justified; so on the other, though he be supposed to want every thing else, yet if he hath faith, he cannot but be justified. For suppose a sinner of any kind or degree, in a full sense of his total ungodliness, of his * The connection of favour and adoption with pardon, arises from the very nature of that act. Pardon, or forgiveness, is release from the penalties and forfeitures incurred by transgression. Of.those penalties, the loss of God's favour, and of filial relation to him was among the most weighty;—pardon, therefore, in its nature, or at least in its natural consequences, implies a restoration to the blessings for¬ feited, for else the penalty would in part remain in force. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 149 utter inability to think, speak, or do goojd, and his ab¬ solute meetness for hell fire;"suppose,I say, this sinner, helpless and-hopeless, casts himself wholly on the mercy of God in Christ, (which indeed he cannot do but by the grace of God,) who can doubt but he is forgiven in that moment ? Who will affirm that any more is indispensably required, before that sinner can be justified 1 " And at what time soever a sinner thus believes, be it in his early childhood, in the strength of his years, or when he is old and hoary-headed, God justifieth that un¬ godly one ; God, for the sake of his Son, pardoneth and absolveth him, who had in him, till then, no good thing. Repentance, indeed, God had given him before; but that repentance was neither more nor less than a deep sense of the want of all good, and the presence of all evil. And whatever good he hath or doeth from that hour, when he first believes in God through Christ, faith does not find, but bring. This is the fruit of faith. First, the tree is good, and then the fruit is good also." Mr. Wesley's views of repentance in this passage will also be noted. Here, as at the first conference, he insists that repentance, which is conviction of sin, and works meet for repentance, go before justifying faith; but he held, with the Church of England, that all works, before justification, had " the nature of sin and that, as they had no root in the love of God, which can only arise from a persuasion of his being reconciled to us, they could not constitute a moral worthiness preparatory to pardon. ■ That a true repentance springs from the grace of God is certain ; but whatever fruits it may bring forth, it changes not man's relation to God. He is a sinner, and is justified as such; " for it is not a saint but a sinner that is forgiven, and under the notion of a sinner." God justifieth the ungodly, not the godly. (Sermons.) Repentance, according to his state¬ ment, is necessary to true faith; but faith alone is the direct and immediate instrument of pardon. Those views of faith (of that faith by which a man, thus penitent, comes to God through Christ) which are express¬ ed in the Minutes of this first conference, deserve a more particular consideration. # Here, as in defining justifica¬ tion, the language of the schools, and of systematic philo¬ sophising divines, is laid aside, and a simple enunciation 13* 150 LIVE OF THE is made of the doctrine of the New Testament.' " Faith in general is a divine, supernatural elenchos. [evidence or conviction] of things not seen, that is, of past, future, or spiritual things. It is a spiritual sight of God, and the things of God." (JVLinutes*) In this description, faith is distinguished from mere belief, or an intellectual conviction which the consideration of the evidences of the truth of Scripture may produce, and yet lead to no practical or saving consequence; and that there may be a sincere and undoubting belief of the truth, without producing any saving effect, is a point which our very consciousness may sufficiently assure us of; although, in order to support a particular theory on the subject of faith, this has sometimes been denied. Trust is constantly implied in the Scriptural account of accept¬ able and saving faith, and this is the sepse in which it was evidently taken in the above definition; for its pro¬ duction in the heart is referred to supernatural agency, and it is made to result from, and to be essentially con¬ nected with, a demonstration of spiritual things,—such a conviction, wrought by the teaching Spiiit, as " produces not merely a full persuasion but a full reliance. Six years before this time, Mr. Wesley, in a sermon before the university of Oxford, had more at large expressed the same views as to justifying faith: " Christian faith is not only an assent to the whole Gospel of Christ, but also a full reliance on the blood of Christ, a trust in the merits of his life, death, and resurrection; a recumbency upon him as our atonement and our life, as given for us, and living in us. It is a sure confidence which a man hath in God that, through the merits of Christ, his sins are forgiven, and he reconciled to the favour of God; and, in conse¬ quence hereof, a closing with him, and cleaving to him, as our ' wisdom, righteousness, sanctilication, and Vedemp- tion,' or, in one word, our salvation." (Sermons.) It will however be remarked, that, in order to suppoit his view of the nature of justifying faith by the authority of the Church of England, Mr. Wesley has quoted her words from the Homily on Salvation in the lat.ter part of the above extract; and he thereby i^volved-'fhe subject in an obscurity which some time afterward he detected and acknowledged. The incorrectness of the wording of the REV; JOHN WESEEf. 151 Homily is indeed yery apparent, although in substance it is sound and Scriptural. When that Homily defines justi¬ fying faith to be " a sure trust and confidence which a man hath in God that his sins are forgiven, and he recon¬ ciled to the favour of God," it is clear that, by the founders of the English Church, saving faith was regarded not as mere belief, but as an act of trust arid confidence subsequent to the discovery made to a mafi of his sin and danger, and the fear and penitential sorrow which are thereby produced. The object of that faith they make to be God, assuredly referring to God in the exercise of his mercy through the atonement and intercession of Christ; and the trust and confidence of which the Homily speaks must be therefore •taken to imply a distinct recognition of the merits of Christ, and a full reliance upon them. So far all is scripturally correct, although not so fully expressed as could be desired. That from such a faith exercised in these circumstances, a " confidence," taking the word in the sense of persuasion or assurance, that " a man's sins are forgiven, and he reconciled to the favour of .God," certainly follows, is the doctrin^ of Scripture; and the authority oF the Homily maf therefore also be quoted in favour of that view of assurance at which Churchmen have so often stumbled, and to which they have so often scornfully referred as the fanatical invention of modern sectaries. There is, how¬ ever, an errorin the Homily which lies not in its substance and general intent,*but in this, that it applies the same terms, " trust and confidence," both to God's mercy in Christ, which is its proper object, and to " the forgiveness of sins," which is the consequence of a sure trust and confi¬ dence in God as exercising mercy " through Christ," because it is that in order to which the trust or confidence is exercised. It follows, therefore, that either there is an error in the latter part of the statement itself; justifying faith not being a confidence that sin is forgiven, which is absurd, because it is the condition previously required i$ order to the forgiveness of sin; or otherwise, which is probable, that the term " confidence," in the mind of the writer of the Homily, was taken in a different sense when applied to God the object of trust, and to the forgiveness of sin ; and, when referred to the latter, meant that persua¬ sion of the fact of being forgiveq which must be attributed 152 LIFE OF THE to a secret assurance of remission and acceptance by the spirit of adoption, and which ordinarily closely follows, or is immediately connected with, justifying faith, but which is not of its essence. But " confidence" in this sense implies filial confidence, the trust of a child, of one already passed into the family of God, and hence this is rather the description of the habitual faith of a justified man than of the act by which a sinner is justified and adopted. Mr. Wesley therefore soon perceived that the definition of justifying faith in this Homily, needed some correction, and he thus expressed his views in 1747, in'a letter to his brother:— " Is justifying faith a sense of pardon ? Negatur." It is denied. " By justifying faith I mean that faith which whosoever hath not, is under the wrath and the curse of God. By a sense of pardon I mean a distinct, explicit assurance that my sins are forgiven. " I allow, 1. That there is such an explicit assurance. 2. That it is the common privilege of real Christians. 3. That it is the common Christian faith, which purifieth the heart, and overcometh the world." * J* * * " But the assertion, that justifying faith is a sense of pardon, is contrary to reason: it is flatly absurd. For how can a sense of our having received pardon, be the condition of pur receiving it ? " But does not our Church give this account of justify¬ ing faith? I am sure she does of saving or Christian faith : I think she does of justifying faith too. But to the law and to the testimony. All men may err: but the word of the Lord shall stand for ever." Mr. Wesley, however, still regarded that trust in the merits of Christ's death, in which justifying faith consists, as resulting from a supernatural conviction that Christ " loved me" as an individual, and "gave himself for me" In this he placed the proof that faith is " the gift of God," a work of the Holy Spirit, as being produced along with this conviction, or immediately following it. From this super¬ natural conviction, not only that God was in Christ " reconciling the world unto himself," but that he died " for my sins," there follows an entire committal of the case of the soul to the merits of the sacrifice of Christ, in REV. JOHN WESLEY. 153 an act of trust;—in that moment, he held, God pardons and absolves him that so believes or trusts, and that this, his pardon or justification, is then witnessed to him by the Holy Ghost. Nor can a clearer or simpler view of stating this great subject, in accordance with the Scriptures, be well conceived. The state of a penitent is one of various degrees of doubt, but all painful. He questions the love of God to him, from a deep sense of his sin, although he may allow that he loves all the world beside. Before he can fully rely on Christ, and the promises of the Gospel, he must have heightened and more influential views of God's love in Christ, and of his own interest in it. It is the office of the Holy Spirit " to take of the things of Christ, and show them" to the humble mind. This office of the Spirit agrees with that sXefyps or " divine convic¬ tion," of which Mr. Wesley speaks, and which shows, with the power of demonstrative evidence, the love of Christ to the individual himself in the intention of his sacrifice. From this results an entire and joyful acqui¬ escence with the appointed method of salvation, and a full reliance, upon it, followed, according to the promise of Scripture, with actual forgivenesSj and the cheering testi¬ mony of the Spirit of adoption. Of this faith he allowed different degrees, yet the lowest degree saving; and also different degrees of assurance, and therefore of joy. He was'careful to avoid binding the work of the Spirit to one rule, and to distinguish between that peace which flows from a comfortable persuasion of " acceptance through Christ," and those higher joys which may be produced by that more heightened assurance which God is pleased in many cases to impart. He taught that the essence of true justifying faith consists in the entire personal trust of the man of a penitent and broken spirit upon the merits of his Saviour, as having died for him; and that to all who so believe, faith is " imputed for righteousness," or in other words, pardon was administered.* * That Mr. "Wesley did not hold that assurance of personal pardon is of the essence of justifying faith is certain, from the remarks in his letter to his brother before quoted, in which he plainly states, that to believe that I am pardoned in order to pardon, is an absurdity and a contradiction. There will, however, appear some obscurity in a few- other passages in his writings, unless we notice the sense in which he uses certain terms, a ma tter in which he never felt himself bound by 154 LIFE OF THE The immediate fruits of justifying faith are stated in these Minutes to be " peace, joy, love; power over all outward sin, and power to keep down inward sin." Justifying faith, when lost, is not again attainable, except by repentance and prayer; but " no believer need come again into a state of doubt, or fear, or darkness; and that (ordinarily at least) he will not, unless by ignorance or the systematic phraseology of scholastic theologians. Thus there is an apparent discrepancy between the statement of his views as given above, and the following passage in his sermon on the " Scripture Way of Salvation— "Taking the word in a more particular sense, faith is a divine evi¬ dence and conviction, not only that 'God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself;' but also that Christ loved me, and gave him¬ self for me. It is by faith (whether we term it, the essence, or rather a property thereof) that we receive Christ, that we receive him in all his offices, as Prophet, Priest, and King. It is by this that he is 'made of God unto .us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption.' " 'But is this the faith of assurance, or the faith of adherence ? The Scripture mentions no such distinction. The Apostle says, 'There is one faith, and one hope of our calling,' one Christian, saving faith, 'as there is one Lord,' in whom we believe, and 'one God and Father of us all.' And it is certain, this faith necessarily implies an assurance (which is here only another word for evidence, it being hard to tell the difference between them) that? Christ loved me, and gave himself for me. For ' he that believeth,' with the true living faith, ' hath the witness in himself:' 'The Spirit witnesseth with his spirit, that he is a child of God.' 'Because he is a son, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into his heart, crying, Abba, Fathergiving him an assurance that he is so, and a child-like confidence in him. But let it be observed that, in the very nature of the thing, the assurance goes before the confi¬ dence. For a man cannot have a child-like confidence in God till he know he is a child of God. Therefore, confidence, trust, reliance, adherence, or whatever else it be called, is not the first, as some have supposed, but the second branch or act of faith." Yet in fact the only difficulty arises from not attending to his mode of stating the case, and his use of the term assurance. When he says that faith includes both adherence and assurance, it is obvious that he does not mean by assurance, the assurance of personal acceptance, which he distinctly, in the same passage, ascribes to the direct testi¬ mony of the Spirit of God; but the assurance that Christ "died for me," " for my sins," which special manifestation of God's love in Christ to me as an individual, producing an entire trust in the divine sacrifice for sin, he attributes to a supernatural elenchos or conviction. This, however, he considers as a " conviction" in order to faith or trust; and then the act of personal and entire trust in this manifested love and goodness is succeeded by the direct testimony of the Spirit of adop¬ tion, which he tells us gives a man " the assurance that he is a child of God, and a child-like confidence in him." And when he goes on so truly to state, that "in the very nature of the thing, the assuranc REV. JOHN WESLEY 155 unfaithfulness." Assaults of doubt and fear are however admitted, even after great confidence and joy; and " occa¬ sional heaviness of spirit before large manifestations of the presence and favour of God." To these views of doctrine may be added, that regeneration or the new birth is held to be concomitant with justification. " Good works cannot go before this faith; much less can sanctification, which implies a continued course of good works, springing from holiness of heart; but they follow after and the reason given for this is, that as salvation, which includes a present deliver¬ ance from sin, a restoration of the soul to its primitive health, the renewing of the soul after the image of God, all holy and heavenly tempers and conversation, is by faith, it can¬ not precede faith, which is the appointed instrument of attaining it. To increase in all these branches of holiness, the exercise of faith in prayer, and the use of all the means appointed by God, are also necessary; a living faith being that which unites the soul to Christ, and secures the con¬ stant indwelling and influence of the Holy Spirit in the heart. Such a faith must therefore necessarily lead to universal holiness of heart and life, and stands as an im¬ pregnable barrier against Pharisaism on the one hand, and the pollutions of Antinomianism on the other, goes before the confidence," and that " confidence, trust, or reliance," is not the first but the second branch of faith, he evidently does not here mean that confidence and trust in the merit of Christ by which we are justified, but filial trust and confidence in God as our reconciled Father, which must necessarily be subsequent to the other. Accord¬ ing to Mr..Wesley's views, the order of our passing into a state of justification and conscious reconcilement to God, is, 1. True repent¬ ance, which, however, gives us no worthiness, and establishes no claim upon pardon, although it so necessarily precedes justifying faith, that all trust even in the finerits of Christ for salvation would be pre¬ sumptuous and unauthorized without repentance; since, as he says, " Christ is not even to be offered to the careless sinner." (Sermon on " the Laio established through Faith") 2. A supernatural elenchos, or assured conviction, that "Christ loved me, and gave himself for me," in the intention of his death; inciting to and producing full acquies¬ cence with God's method of saving the guilty, and an entire personal trust in Christ's atonement for sin. Of this trust, actual justification is the result; but then follows, 3. The direct testimony of the Holy Spirit, giving assurance in different degrees, m different persons, and often in the same person, that I am a child of God ; and, 4. Filial confidence in God. The elenchos, the trust, the Spirit's witness, and the filial confidence he held, were frequently, but not always, so closely united as not to be distinguished as to time, though each is, from its nature, successive and distinct. 156 life of; the On another doctrine* in defence of which Mr. Wesley afterward wrote much, these early Minutes of Conference contain perhaps the best epitome of his views, and may be somewhat at length quoted. " Q. 1. What is it to be sanctified? " A. To be renewed in the image of God, in righteous¬ ness and true holiness. " Q. 2. Is faith the condition, or the instrument, of sanctification ? " A. It is both the condition and instrument of it. When we begin to believe, then sanctification begins. And as faith increases, holiness increases, till we are created anew. " Q. 3. What is implied in being a perfect Christian ? " A. The loving the Lord our God with all our heart, and with all our mind, and soul, and strength, Deut. vi, 5; xxx, 6 ; Ezek. xxxvi, 25-29. " Q. 4. Does this imply that all inward sin is taken away? " A. W'.thout doubt: or how could he be said to be saved ' from all his uncleannesses ?' Ezek. xxxvi, 29." And again,— " Q. 1. How much is allowed by our brethren who differ from us, with regard to entire sanctification ? " A. They grant, 1. That every one must be entirely sanctified in the article of death. " 2. That, till then, a believer daily grows in grace, comes nearer and nearer to perfection. " 3. That we ought to be continually pressing after this, and to exhort all others so to do. " Q. 2. What do we allow to them ? "A. We grant, 1. That many of those who have died in the faith, yea, the greater part of those we have known, were not sanctified throughout, not made perfect in love, till a little before death. " 2. That the term ' sanctified,' is continually applied by St. Paul to all that were justified, were true believers. " 3. That by this term alone, he rarely (if ever) means, saved from all sin. "4. That, consequently, it is not proper to use it in this sense, without adding the word ' wholly, entirely,' or the like. " 5. That the inspired writers almost continually speak REV. JOfiN WESLEY 157 of or to those who were justified; but very rarely, either of or to those who were wholly sanctified. " 6. That, consequently, it behooves us to speak in pub¬ lic almost continually of the state of justification ; but more rarely, at least in full and explicit terms, concerning entire sanctification. " Q. 3. What then is the point wherein we divide 1 " A. It is this : whether we should expect to be saved from all sin, before the article of death. " Q. 4. Is there any clear Scripture promise of this! that God will save us from all sin] " A. There is : Psalm cxxx?>8,4 He shall redeem Israel from all his sins.' " This is more largely expressed in the prophecy of Ezekiel: 4 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and you shall be clean; from all your filthiness and from all your idols will I cleanse you. I will also save you from all your uncleannesseschap, xxxvi, 25, 29. No promise can be more clear. And to this the Apostle plainly refers in that exhortation,' Having these promises, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of flesh arid spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God,' 2 Cor. vii, 1. Equally clear and express is that ancient promise, " The Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul,' Deut. xxx, 6. " Q. 5. But does any assertion answerable to this, occur in the New Testament] " A. There does, and that laid down in the plainest terms. So St. John iii, 8, ' For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil;' the works of the devil, without any limitation or restriction ; but all sin is the work of the devil. Parallel to which is that assertion of St. Paul, Eph. v, 25, 27,' Christ loved the church, and gave himself for it—that he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing, but that it should be holy and without blemish.' " And to the same effect is his assertion in the eighth of Romans, (verses 3, 4,) ' God sent his Son—that the right¬ eousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, walking not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.' 14 158 LIFE OF THE " Q. 6. Does the New Testament afford any farther ground for expecting to be saved from all sin ? " A. Undoubtedly it does, both in those prayers and commands which are equivalent to the strongest assertions. " Q. 7. What prayers do you mean ? " A. Prayers for entire sanctification ; which, were there no such thing, would be mere mockery of God. Such in particular, are 1. ' Deliver us from evilor rather, ' from the evil one.' Now when this is done, when we are delivered from all evil, there can be no sin remaining.— 2. ' Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word ; that they all may be one, as thou Father art in me, and I in thee ; that they also may be one in us : I in them and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one,' John xvii, 20, 21, 23.— 3. ' I bow my knees unto the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ—that he would grant you—that ye, being rooted and grounded in love, may be able to comprehend with all saints, what is the breadth, and length, and height, and to know the love of Christ which passeth knowledge, that ye might be filled with all the fulness of God,' Eph. iii, 14, 16-19. 4. 'The very God of peace sanctify you wholly. And I pray God, your whole spirit, soul, and body, be preserved blameless, unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ,' 1 Thess. v, 23. " Q. 8. What command is there to the same effect? " A. 1. ' Be ye perfect, as your Father which is in hea¬ ven is perfect,' Matt, vi, ult. "2. ' Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind,' Matt, xxii, 37. But if the love of God fill all the heart, there can be no sin there. " Q. 9. But how does it appear, that this is to be done before the article of death? "A. First, from the very nature of a command, which is not given to the dead, but to the living. " Therefore, ' Thou shalt love God with all thy heart,' cannot mean, Thou shalt do this when thou diest, but while thou livest. " Secondly, from express texts of Scripture :— "1. 'The grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men ; teaching us, that having renounced REV. JOHN WESLEY. 159 (ApvuitfttfJi-svoi) ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly in this present world : looking for—the glorious appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ; who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity ; and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works,' Tit%ii, 11-14. "2. ' He hath raised up a horn of salvation for us— to perform the mercy promised to our fathers: the oath which he sware to our father Abraham, that he would grant unto us, that we, being delivered out of the hands of our enemies, should serve him without fear, in holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life,' Luke i, 69, &c. " Q,. 16. Does not the harshly preaching perfection, tend to bring believers into a kind of bondage or slavish fear 1 " A. It does. Therefore we should always place it in the most amiable light, so that it may excite only hope, joy, and desire. " Q. 17. Why may we not continue in the joy of faith, even till we are made perfect 1 " A. Why indeed 1 since holy grief does not quench this joy : since, even while we are under the cross, while we deeply partake of the sufferings of Christ, we may rejoice with joy unspeakable. " Q. 18. Do we not discourage believers from rejoicing evermore ? "A. We ought not so to do. Let them, all their life tong, rejoice unto God, so it be with reverence. And even if lightness or pride should mix with their joy, let us not strike at the joy itself, (this is the gift of God,) but at that lightness or pride that the evil may cease, and the good remain. " Q. 20. But ought we not to be troubled on account of the sinful nature which still remains in us 1 " A. It is good for us to have a deep sense of this, and to be much ashamed before the Lord. But this should only incite us the more earnestly to turn unto Christ every moment, and to draw light, and life, and etrength from him, that we may go on, conquering and to conquer. And therefore, when the sense of our sin most abounds, the sense of his love should mueh more abound." 160 LIFE OF THE The doctrine of assurance, and the source of it, the testimony of. the Holy Spirit, as the Spirit of adoption, are frequently referred to in these early doctrinal con¬ versations. This however is more fully stated in Mr. Wesley's sermons, and the following extracts will be necessary to present his views on this subject in their true light:— " But what is the ivitness of the Spirit ? The original word /utaprupi'a, maybe rendered either, (as it is in several places,) the witness, or, less ambiguously, the testimony, or the record: so it is rendered in our translation, 1 John v, 11, 'This is the record,' the testimony, the sum of what God testifies in all the inspired writings, 'that God hath given unto us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.' The testimony now under consideration is given by the Spirit of God to and with our spirit. He is the Person testifying. What he testifies to us is, ' that we are the children of God.' The immediate result of this testimony is, ' the fruit of the Spiritnamely, ' love, joy, peace ; long-suffering, gentleness, goodness.' And without these, the testimony itself cannot continue. For, it is inevitably destroyed, not only by the commission of any outward sin, or the omission of known duty, but by giving way to any inward sin : in a word, by whatever grieves the Holy Spirit of God. " 2. I observed many years ago,"' It is hard to find words in the language of men, to explain the deep things of God. Indeed there are none that will adequately express what the Spirit of God works in his children. But, perhaps, one might say, (desiring any who are taught of God to correct, soften, or strengthen the expression,) By the ' testimony of the Spirit' I mean, an inward impres¬ sion on the soul, whereby the Spirit of God immediately and directly witnesses to my spirit, that I am a child of God; that' Jesus Christ hath loved me, and given himself for me*,' that all my sins are blotted out, and I, even I, am reconciled to God. " 3. After twenty years' farther consideration, I see no cause to retract any part of this. Neither do I conceive how any of these expressions may be altered, so as to make them more intelligible. I can only add, that if any of the children of God will point out any other express REV. JOHN WESLEY 161 sions which are more clear, or more agreeable to the word of God, I will readily lay these aside. " 4. Meantime let it be observed, I do not mean hereby, that the Spirit of God testifies this by any outward voice: no, nor always by an inward voice, although he may do this sometimes. Neither do I suppose, that he always applies to the heart (though he often may) one or more texts of Scripture. But he so works upon the soul by his immediate influence, and by a strong, though inexplicable operation, that the stormy wind and troubled waves subside, and there is a sweet calm: the heart resting as in the arms of Jesus, and the sinner being clearly satisfied that all his ' iniquities are forgiven, and his sins covered.' " 5. Now what is the matter of dispute concerning this 1 Not, whether there be a witness or testimony of the Spirit. Not, whether the Spirit does testify with our spirit, that we are the Children of God. None can deny this, without flatly contradicting the Scriptures, and charg¬ ing a lie upon the God of truth. Therefore that there is a testimony of the Spirit, is acknowledged by all parties. " 6. Neither is it questioned, whether there is an indi¬ rect witness or testimony, that we are the children of God. This is nearly, if not exactly, the same with ' the testimony of a good conscience toward Godand is the result of reason, or reflection on what we feel in our own souls. Strictly speaking, it is a conclusion drawn partly from the word of God, and partly from our own experience. The word of God says, Every one who has the fruit of the Spirit is a child of God. Experience or inward con¬ sciousness tells me, that I have the fruit of the Spirit; and hence I rationlly conclude, therefore I am a child of God. This is likewise allowed on all hands, and so is no matter of controversy. " 7. Nor do we assert, that there can be any real testi¬ mony of the Spirit, without the fruit of the Spirit. We assert, on the contrary, that the fruit of the Spirit imme¬ diately springs from this testimony; not always indeed in the same degree even when the testimony is first given; and much less afterward: neither joy nor peace is always at one stay. No, nor love: as neither is the testimony itself always equally strong and clear. " 8. But the point in question is, whether there be any 14* 162 LIFE OF THE direct testimony of the Spirit at all; whether there be any other testimony of the Spirit, than that which arises from a consciousness of the fruit. "1. I believe there is, because that is the plain, natural meaning of the text,' the Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.' It is manifest, here are two witnesses mentioned, who together testify the same thing, the Spirit of God, and our own spirit. The late Bishop of London, in his sermon on this text, seems astonished that any one can doubt of this, which appears upon the very face of the words. Now ' the testimony of our oivn spirit, (says the Bishop,) is one, which is the consciousness of our own sincerityor to express the same thing a little more clearly, the consciousness of the fruit of the Spirit. When our spirit is conscious of this, of love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, it easily infers from these premises, that we are the children of God. " 2. It is true, that great man supposes the other witness to be ' the consciousness of our own good works.' This, he affirms, is ' the testimony of God's Spirit.' But this is included in the testimony of our own spirit: yea, and in sincerity, even according to the common sense of the word. So the Apostle, 'Our rejoicing is this, the testimony of our conscience, that in simplicity and godly, sincerity we have, our conversation in the world:' where it is plain, sincerity refers to our words and actions, at least as much as to our inward dispositions. So that this is not another witness, but the very same that he mentioned before: the conscious¬ ness of our good works being only one branch of the con¬ sciousness of our sincerity. Consequently here is only one witness still. If therefore the text speaks of two wit¬ nesses, one of these is not the consciousness of our good works, neither of our sincerity: all this being manifestly contained in ' the testimony of our spirit.' " 3. What then is the other witness 1 This might easily be learned, if the text itself were not sufficiently clear, from the verse immediately preceding. ' Ye have received, not the spirit of bondage, but the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, 'Abba, Father.' It follows, 'The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.' REV. JOHN WESLEY. 163 " 4. This is farther explained by the parallel text, Gal. * iv, 6 : ' Because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.' Is not this something immediate and direct, not the result ol reflection or argumentation! Does not this Spirit cry, ' Abba, Father,' in our hearts, the moment it is given ! antecedently to any reflection upon our sincerity, yea, to any reasoning whatsoever! And is not this the plain, natural sense of the words, which strikes any one as soon as he hears them! All these texts then, in their most obvious meaning, describe a direct testimony of the Spirit. " 5. That the testimony of the Spirit of God must, in the very nature of things, be antecedent to the testimony of our own spirit, may appear from this single consideration. We must be holy in heart and life, before we can be conscious that we are so. But we must love God before we can be holy at all, this being the root of all holiness. Now we cannot love God, till we know he loves us: 'we love him because he first loved us.' And we cannot know his love to us, till his Spirit witnesses it to Qur spirit. Since there¬ fore the testimony of his Spirit must precede the love of God arid all holiness, of consequence it must precede our consciousness thereof." A doctrine so often misrepresented and misunderstood could not be so properly stated, as in Mr. Wesley's own words; and as many, and those even professing to be sober Christians, have, principally with reference to this doctrine, frequently opened upon this venerable man the full cry of enthusiasm and fanatical delusion, it may be proper to add a few explanatory and defensive remarks, and that not merely for the sake of justice to his opinions, but in support of a great doctrine of revelation, most intimately connected with the hope and comfort of man. And, 1. The doctrine of assurance as held by the founder of Methodism was not the assurance of eternal salvation as held by Calvinistic divines ; but that persuasion which is given by the Holy Spirit to penitent and believing per¬ sons, that they are " now accepted of God, pardoned, and adopted into God's family." It was an assurance, there¬ fore, on the ground of which no relaxation of religious effort could be pleaded, and no unwatchfulness of spirit or irregularity of life allowed : for he taught, that only by the 164 LIFE OF THE lively exercise of the same humble and obedient faith in the merits and intercession of Christ, this state of mind could be maintained, and it was made by him a motive (influential as our desire of inward peace can be influential) to vigilance and obedience. 2. This doctrine cannot be denied without disconnecting religion from peace of mind, and habitual consolation. For if it is the doctrine of the inspired records, and of all orthodox churches, that man is by nature prono to evil, and that in practice he violates that law under which as a creature he is placed, and is thereby exposed to punish¬ ment ;—if also it is there stated, that an act of grace and pardon is promised on the conditions of repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ;—if that repent¬ ance implies consideration of our ways, a sense of the displeasure of Almighty God, contrition of heart, and con sequently trouble and grief of mind, mixed, however, with hope, inspired by the promise of forgiveness, and which leads to earnest supplication for the actual pardon of sin so promised, it will follow from these premises, either, that forgiveness is not to be expected till after the termination of our course of probation, that is, in another life; and that, therefore, this trouble and apprehension of mind can only be assuaged by the hope we may have of a favourable final decision on our case ;—or, that sin is, in the present life, forgiven as often as it is thus repented of, and as often as we exercise the required and specific acts of trust in the merits of our Saviour; but that this forgiveness of our sins is not in any way made known unto us : so that we are left, as to our feelings, in precisely the same state as if sin were not forgiven till after death, namely, in grief and trouble of mind, relieved only by hope ;—or, that when sin is forgiven by the mercy of God through Christ, we are, by some means, assured of it, and peace and satisfaction of mind take the place of anxiety and fear. The first of these conclusions is sufficiently disproved by the authority of Scripture, which exhibits justification as a blessing attainable in this life, and represents it as actually experienced by true believers. " Therefore being justified by faith," &c. " There is now no condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus." "Whosoever believeth is justified from all things," &c. The quotations might REV. JOHN WESLEY. 165 be multiplied, but these are decisive. The notion, that though an act of forgiveness may take place, we are unable to ascertain a fact so important to us, is also irreconcilable with many texts in which the writers of the New Testament speak of an experience, not confined personally to them¬ selves, or to those Christians who were endowed with spiritual gifts, but common to all Christians. " Being justified by faith ws have peace with God." " We joy in God, by whom we have received the reconciliation." " Being reconciled unto God by the death of his .Son." "We have not received the spirit of bondage again unto fear, but the Spirit of adoption whereby we cry, Abba, Father." To these maybe added innumerable passages which express the comfort, the confidence, and the joy of Christians ; their " friendship" with God ; their " access" to him; their entire union and delightful intercourse with him; and their absolute confidence in the success of their prayers. All such passages are perfectly consistent with deep humility, and self-diffidence ; but they are irreconcil¬ able with a state of hostility between the parties, and with an unascertained, and only hoped-for, restoration of friend¬ ship and favour. 3. The services of the Church of which Mr. Wesley was a minister, may be pleaded also in support of his opinions on this subject. Those services, though, with propriety, as being designed for the use not of true Chris¬ tians only, but of mixed congregations, they abound in acts of confession, and the expressions of spiritual grief, exhibit also this confidence and peace, as objects of earnest desire and hopeful anticipation, and as blessings attainable in the present life. We pray to be made "children by adoption and grace;" to be " relieved from the fear of punishment by the comfort of God's gracenot to be " left comfortless, but that God, the King of Glory, would send to us the Holy Ghost to comfort us;" and that by the same Spirit having a right judgment in all things, " we may evermore rejoice in his holy comfort." In the prayer directed to be used for one troubled in mind or in con¬ science, we have also the following impressive petitions: " Break not the bruised reed, nor quench the smoking flax. Shut not up thy tender mercies in displeasure, but make him to hear of joy and gladness, that the bones which thou 166 LIFE OF THE hast broken may rejoice. Deliver him from the fear of the enemy, and lift up the light of thy countenance upon him, and give him peace.'''' Now unless it be contended, that by these petitions we are directed to seek what we can never find, and always to follow that which we can never overtake, the Church, in the spirit of the New Tes¬ tament, assumes that the forgiveness of sins, and the relief of the sorrows of the penitent state, are attainable, with those consequent comforts and joys which can only arise from some assurance of mind, by whatever means and in whatever degree communicated, that we have a personal interest in the general promise, and that we are reconciled to God by the death of his Son. For since the general promise is made to many who will never be benefited by it, it cannot of itself be the ground of a settled religious peace of mind. As it is a promise of blessings to -be indi¬ vidually experienced, unless I can have personal experience of them, it holds up to hope what can never come into fruition.* * " Faith is not merely a speculative but a practical acknowledgment of Jesus as the Christ,—an effort and motion of the mind toward God ; when the sinner, convinced of sin, acceptswith thankfulness the prof¬ fered tenns of pardon, and in humble confidence applying individually to himself the benefit of the general atonement, in the elevated language of a venerable father of the Church, drinks of the stream which flows from the Redeemer's side. The effect is, that in a little he is filled with that perfect love of God which casteth out fear,—he cleaves to God with the entire affection of the soul. And from this active lively faith, overcoming the world, subduing carnal self, all those good works do necessarily spring, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."—Bishop Horslty's Sermons. "The purchase, therefore, was paid at once, yet must he,severally reckoned to every soul whom it shall benefit. If we have not a hand to take what Christ's hand doth either hold or offer, what is sufficient in him cannot be effectual to us. The spiritual hand, whereby we apprehend the sweet offer of our Saviour, is faith, which, in short, is no other than an affiance in the Mediator. Receive peace, and be happy: believe, and thou hast received. Thus it is that we have an interest in all that God hath promised, or Christ hath performed. Thus have we from God both forgiveness and love, the ground of all whether peace or glory."—Bishop Hall's Heaven upon Earth. ' It is the property of saving faith, that it hath a force to appropri¬ ate, and make Christ our own. Without this, a general remote belief would have been cold comfort. 'He loved me, and gave himself for me,' saith St. Paul. What saith St. Chrysostom? 'Did Christ die only for St. Paul ? No. JVon excludit, sed appropriate he excludes not others, but he will secure himself."—Bishop Brownrigg's Sermon an Easter Day. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 167 An assurancej therefore, that those sins which were felt to " be a burden intolerable" are forgiven, and that all ground of that apprehension of future punishment which causes the penitent to " bewail his manifold sins" is re¬ moved by restoration to the favour of the offended God, must be allowed, or nothing would be more incongruous and indeed impossible than the comfort, the peace, the rejoicing of spirit, which, in the Scriptures, are attributed to believers. If, indeed, self-condemnation, and the appre¬ hension of danger, had no foundation but in the imagina¬ tion, the case would be totally altered. Where there is no danger, deliverance is visionary ; and the joy it inspires is raving, and not reason. But if a real danger exists; and if we cannot escape it except by an act of grace on the part of Almighty God, we must have some evidence of his gracious interposition in our case, or the guilty gloom will abide upon us. The more sincere and earnest a person is in the affairs of his salvation, the more miserable he must become if there be no possibility of his knowing that the wrath of God no longer abideth upon him :—then the ways of wisdom would be no longer "ways of pleasant¬ ness, and paths of peace." 4. Few real Christians therefore have ever denied the possibility of our becoming so persuaded of the favour and good will of God toward us as to produce substantial com¬ fort to the mind ; but they have-differed in opinion as to the means by which this is acquired. Some have said that we obtain it by inference ; others, by the direct inward tes¬ timony of the Holy Spirit. The latter, as we have seen, was the opinion of Mr. Wesley; but he never failed to connect this doctrine with another, which, on the authority of St. Paul, he calls " the witness of our own spirit,"— " the consciousness of having received, in and by the Spi¬ rit of adoption, the tempers mentioned in the word of God, as belonging to his adopted children—a consciousness that we are inwardly conformed, by the Spirit of God, to the image of his Son, and that we walk before him in justice, mercy, and truth, doing the things which are pleasing in his sight." These two testimonies he never put asunder, although he assigned them distinct offices; and this cannot be overlooked if justice be done to his opinions. In order to prevent presumption, he reminds his readers that the 168 LITE OF THE direct testimony of the Holy Spirit is subsequent to true repentance and faith ; and on the other hand, to' guard against delusion, he asks, " How am I assured that I do not mistake the voice of the Spirit? Even by the testi¬ mony of my own spirit, 'by the answer of a good con¬ science toward Godhereby you shall know that ycu are in no delusion, that you have not deceived your own soul. The immediate fruits of the Spirit ruling in the heart are love, joy, peace, bowels of mercies, humbleness of mind, meekness, gentleness, long-suffering. And the outward fruits are the doing good to all men, and a uniform obedience to all the commands of God." Where then is the enthusiasm of the doctrine as thus stated ? An enthu¬ siastic doctrine is unsupported by the sacred records ; but in confirmation of this we read, " The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God." Here the witnesses are the Spirit of God, and our own spirit; and the fact to which the testimony is given, is, that " we are the children of God."—" And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father!" To these passages may be added all those texts which speak of the inward inter¬ course of the Spirit of God with believers ; of his dwelling in them, and abiding with them as the source of comfort and peace ; and which, therefore, imply the doctrine. Nor can such passages be interpreted otherwise than as teach¬ ing the doctrine of assurance, conveyed immediately to the mind of true believers by the Holy Spirit, without allow¬ ing such principles of construction as would render the sense of Scripture uncertain, and unsettle the evidence of some of the most important doctrines of our religion. It is true that a more " sober" and " less dangerous" method, as it has been called, of obtaining a comfortable assurance of our justification before God, has been insist¬ ed upon as equally consistent with the word of God ; but, upon examination, it will be found delusive. This is what is termed a process of inference, and is thus explained. The question at issue is, " Am I a child of God ?" The Scriptures declare that " as many as are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God." I inquire then, whether I have the Spirit of God ; and, in order to determine this, I examine whether I have " the fruits of the Spirit." Now REV. JOHN WESLEY. 169 * the fruits of the Spirit are love, joy, peace, gentleness, goodness, meekness,»faith, temperanceand having suffi¬ cient evidence of the existence of these fruits, I conclude that I have the Spirit of God, and am, therefore, a pardoned and accepted child of God. This is the statement. But among theife enumerated fruits of the Spirit we find love, joy, and peace, as well as gentleness, goodness, meekness, fidelity, and temperance; and if it be said that no man has a right to assume that " he is so led by the Spirit of God," as to conclude that he is a child of God, who has only the affections of "peace and joy" to ground his confidence upon, we have as good a reason to affirm the same thing, if he has "meekness and temperance," without " love, and peace, and joy ;"—the love, the peace, and the joy, being as much fruits of the Spirit as the moral qualities also enumerated. But can "love," love to God as our Father; "peace," peace with God, as in a state of friendship with us; and "joy,," "joy in God by whom we have received the recon¬ ciliation," exist at all without a previous or concomitant assurance of the divine forgiveness and favour 1 Surely nothing is so clear, that it is not possible to love God as a Father and a Friend, whilst he is still regarded as an offend¬ ed Sovereign and a vengeful Judge; and that to feel a sense of his displeasure, and to be at " peace" with him, and to rejoice in him, are contradictions: and if soothe very ground of this inference, that we are in the divine favour, and adopted into his family, is taken away. This whole inferential process proceeds upon dividing the undi¬ vided fruit of the Spirit, for which we have assuredly no authority ; nor indeed have we any reason to conclude that we have that gentleness, that goodness, that meekness, &c, which the Apostle describes, should the "love, joy, and peace," which he places among the leading fruits of the Spirit, be wanting. If then the whole undivided fruit of the Spirit be taken as the medium of ascertaining the fact of our forgiveness and adoption, and if it is even absurd to suppose that we can love God, whilst yet we feel him to bo angry with us; and that we can rejoice and have peace, whilst the fearful apprehensions of the consequences of unremitted sin are not removed from our minds, then the only ground of our " love, joy, and peace," is pardorj 15 170 life of the revealed and witnessed, directly and immediately, by the Spirit of adoption.* The mind cf Mr. Wesley was also too discriminating not to perceive, that, in the scheme of attaining assurance by inference from moral changes only, there was a total neglect of the offices explicitly ascribed to the Holy Spirit in the New Testament, and which, on this scheme, are unneces¬ sary. These are clearly stated to be that of " bearing witness" with the spirits of believers, that they are the chil¬ dren of God ; -that of the Spirit of adoption, by which they call God Father, in the special sense in which it is correla¬ tive to that sonship which we obtain only by a justifying faith in Christ; and that of a Comforter, promised to the disciples to abide with them "for ever," that their "joy might be full." Enough has been said on this subject to show that * The "precedence of the direct witness of the Spirit of God to the indirect witness of our own, and the dependence of the latter upon the former, are very clearly stated by three divines of great authority; to whom I refer the rather, because many of their followers of the present day have become very obscure in their statements of this branch of Christian experience:— " St. Paul means that the Spirit of God gives such a testimony to us, that he being cur guide and teacher, our spirit concludes our adop¬ tion of God to be certain. For our own mind, of itself, independent of the preceding testimony of the Spirit, [nisi prceeunte Spiritus testi- monio,] could not produce this persuasion in us. For whilst the Spirit witnesses that we are the sons of God, he at the same time inspires this confidence into our minds, that we are bold to call God our Fa¬ ther."—Calvin on Romans viii, 16. " Romans viii, 16, ' The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirits that we are the sons of God the witness which our own spirits do give unto our adoption is the work and effect of the Holy Spirit in us; if it were not, it would be false, and not confirmed by the testimony of the Spirit himself, who is the Spirit of truth. ' And none knoweth the things of God but the Spirit of God,' 1 Cor. ii, 11. If he declare not our sonship in us and to us, we, cannot know it. How doth he then bear witness to our spirits ? What is the distinct testimony ? It must be some such act of his as evidenceth itself to be from him, immediately, unto them that are concerned in it, that is, those unto whom it ia given."—dr. owen on the Spirit, sect. 9. " The Spirit of adoption doth not only excite us to call upon God as our Father, but it doth ascertain and assure us, as befeyre, that we are his children. And this it doth not by an outward voice, as God the Father to Jesus Christ, nor by an angel, as to Daniel and the Vir¬ gin Mary, but by an inward and secret suggestipn, whereby he raiseth our hearts to this persuasion, that God is our Father, and we are his children. This is not the testimony of the graces and operations of the Spirit, but of the Spirit itself."—poole on Romans viii, 16. KEV. JOHN WESLEY. 171 Mr. Wesley, on this doctrine, was neither rash nor incon¬ siderate, much less enthusiastic. It is grounded on no forced, no fanciful interpretation of Scripture ; and it main¬ tains, as of possible attainment, one of the most important and richest comforts of the human mind. It leaves no doubt as to a question which, whilst problematical, must, if we are earnest in seeking our salvation, be fatal to our peace; it supposes an intercourse between God and the minds of good men, which is, surely in the full and genuine spirit of the Christian religion, eminently called the "minis¬ tration of the Spiritand it is, as taught by him, vitally connected with sober, practical piety. That, like the doc¬ trine of justification by faith alone, it is capable of abuse, is very true. Many have perverted both the one and the other. Faith with some has been made a discharge from duty; and with respect to the direct witness of the Spirit, fancy has no doubt been taken, in some instances, for reality. But this could never legitimately follow from the holy preaching of the founder of Methodism. His view of the doctrine is so opposed to license and real enthusiasm, to pride and self-sufficiency, that it can only be made to encourage them by so manifest a perversion, that it has never occurred except among those most ignorant of his writings. He never encouraged any to expect this grace but the truly penitent, and he prescribed to them "fruits meet for repentance." He believed that justification was always accompanied by a renewal of the heart, and as con¬ stantly taught, that the comfort " of the Holy Ghost" could remain the portion only of the humble and spiritual, and was uniformly and exclusively connected with a sanctify¬ ing and obedient faith. He saw that the fruits of the Spirit were " love, joy, peace," as well as " gentleness, goodness, meekness, and faith but he also taught that all who were not living under the constant influence of the latter would fatally deceive themselves by any pretensions to the former. Such were the views of the first Methodists, on these important points, and such are the unchanged opinions of their successors to this day. They may be called peculiari¬ ties, because they differed in some respects from the same doctrines of justification, faith, assurance, and sanctifica- tion, when associated with various modifications of Calvin¬ ism ; and although somewhat similar doctrines are found 172 LIFE OF THE in many Arminian writers, yet in the theology of the Wes- ieys they derive life and vigour from the stronger views of the grace of God which were taught them by their Mora¬ vian and Calvinistic brethren. No man more honestly sought truth than Mr. Wesley, and none more rigidly tried all systems by the law and the testimony. As to authority he was " a man of one book and whatever may be thought peculiar in his views, he drew from that scairce by the best application of his judg¬ ment.* He wanted not, however, authority of another kind for his leading opinions. On the article of justifica¬ tion he agreed with all the Reformed Churches ; his notion of saving faith was substantially that of the divines of the best ages of the Reformation, and of still earlier times; nor was his doctrine of the direct witness of the Spirit to our adoption one as to which any exclusive peculiarity could be attributed to him, except that he more largely and zealously preached it than any other man in modern times. It was the doctrine of Luther, Calvin, Beza, Arminius, and others of equally eminent rank abroad and at home. We * The following beautiful and striking passage, illustrative of the above remark, is from the preface to his Sermons:— " To candid, reasonable men, I am not afraid to lay open what have been the inmost thoughts of my heart. I have thought, I am a creature of a day, passing-through life, as an arrow through the air. I am a -spirit come from God, and returning to God: just hovering over the great gulf ■ till, a few moments hence, I am no more seen! I drop into an unchangeable eternity! I want to know one thing, the way to hea¬ ven : how to land safe on that happy shore. God himself has conde¬ scended to teach the way; for this very end he came from heaven. He hath written it down in a book! O give me that book! At any price, giye me the book of God! I have it: here is knowledge enough for me. Let me be homo unius libri. [A mam of one book.] Here then I am, far from the busy ways of men. I sit down alone! only God is here. In his presence I open, I read his book; for this end, to find the way to heaven. Is there a doubt concerning the meaning of what I read ? Does any thing appear dark and intricate ? I lift up my heart to the Father of Lights.—Lord, is it not thy word, ' If any man lack wisdom, let him ask of God.' Thou ' givest liberally, and upbraidest not.' Thou hast said,-' If any be willing to do thy will, he shall know.' I am willing to do: let me know thy will. I then search after and consider parallel passages of Scripture, 'comparing spiritual things with spiritual.' I meditate thereon, with all the attention and earnest¬ ness of which my mind is capable. If any doubt still remain, I consult those who are experienced in the things of God; and then, the writ¬ ings, whereby, being dead, they yet speak. And what I thus learn, that I teach." REV. JOHN WESLEY. 173 may add also that such prelates and divines qs Hooper, Andrews, Hall, Hooker, Usher, Brownrigg, Wake, Pear¬ son, Barrow, Owen, and Poole, have expressed it in terms as explicit, and with equal deference to the testimony of the word of God. The Minutes of the early conferences are not confined to doctrinal discussions ; but we see in them the frame of the discipline of the body, growing up from year to year, and embodied in many copious directions and arrange¬ ments. The most important of these remain in force to this day, although some in a maturer state of the society have gone into disuse. This discipline need not particu¬ larly be specified, as being for the most part well known and established ; but a few miscellaneous particulars may be selected from the Minutes of several successive years, as being in some instance-s of great importance, and in others characteristic, and occasionally amusing. The duty of obeying bishops was considered at the very first conference of 1744 ; and the conclusion is, that this obedience extends only to things indifferent; a rather strict narrowing up of canonical obedience, at this early period.— The establishment of " a seminary for labourers" was a subject of consideration at this conference also, but was postponed. The reasons why it was not afterward carried into effect appear to have been, the rapid spread of the work, and the consequent demand for additional preachers. Mr. Wesley also looked to Kingswood school as subsidiary to this design. In the meantime he enjoined the study of the Greek -and Latin poets and historians, as well as the original Scriptures, upon the preachers; and a large course of theological and general reading. This shows his views as to the subserviency of literature to usefulness in the ministry.* * As the subject of a seminary or college has been of late brought under discussion, it may be not uninteresting to those who have not access to the manuscript copies of the first Minutes, extracts from which only are in print, to give the passages which relate to this subject from the complete Minutes of 1744 and 1745. In the former year it is asked, " Can we have a seminary for labourers?" and the answer is, "If God spare us till another conference." The next year the subject was resumed, " Can we have a seminary for labourers yet ?" Answer. "Not till God gives us a proper tutor." So that the institution was actually resolved upon, and delayed only by circumstances* 174 LIFE OF THE No preaching was to be continued where societies were not raised up. It seems to have been a fixed maxim with the Wesleys, not to spend time in cultivating barren ground. No band ticket was to be given to the wearers of ruffles, —a practice which, though then common, accorded not with their notions either of good taste, or of the duty of economizing money in order to charity.—Equal strictness was observed as to the dress of females. Simplex mundiiiis [plainness with neatness] was Mr. Wesley's classical rule; and the exclusive " ornament of a meek and quiet spirit," his Scriptural one.—All who married un¬ believers were to be expelled from Society.—The people were required not only to stand during singing, but whilst the text was read. This excellent custom now continues only in Ireland.—Dram-drinking and pawnbroking were also sins of exclusion: so that, in fact, the Methodist societies were the first Temperance Societies.—Reading was enjoined as a religious duty, and every preacher was bound to circulate every new book published or recom¬ mended by Mr. Wesley; so anxious was he to spread useful knowledge through society, and to improve at once the intellects and the hearts of his people.—The officers of the society are said to be " clergymen, assistants, nelpers, stewards, leaders of bands, leaders of classes, visiters of the sick, schoolmasters, and house-keepers." The last class will in the present day create a smile; but at that time their business was to reside in the houses built in several of the large towns, where both Mr. Wesley and the preachers took up their abode during their stay. They were elderly and pious women, who, being once invested with an official character, extended it sometimes from the house to the church, to the occasional annoyance of the preachers. As married preachers began to occupy the houses, they were at length dispensed with.—Smuggling and the buying of uncustomed goods had frequent anathe¬ mas dealt out against them, and expulsion was the unmiti¬ gated penalty.—Respect of persons was strictly forbidden to the preachers, who were also enjoined to be easy of access to all.—Every preacher was to promise rather to break a limb than to disappoint a congregation.—No preacher was to be continued who could not preach twice every day.—He was to take care that only suitable tunes REV. JOHN WESLEY. 175 should be sung; and was advised to use in public only hymns of prayer and praise, not those descriptive of states of mind.—Lemonade was to be taken after preaching, or candied orange-peel, or a little warm ale; but egg and wine, and late suppers, are denounced as downright poison.— The views entertained of a call to the ministry, deserve quoting in full:— "Q. How shall we try those who think they are moved by the Holy Ghost, and called of God to preach 1 "A. Inquire, 1. Do they know God, as a pardoning God? Have they the love of God abiding in them? Do they desire and seek nothing but God ? And are they holy in all manner of conversation ? "2. Have they gifts (as well as grace) for the work? Have they a clear, sound understanding ? Have they a right judgment in the things of God? Have they a just concep¬ tion of salvation by faith ? And has God given them any degree of utterance? Do they speak justly, readily, clearly ? " 3. Have they fruit ? Are any truly convinced of sin, and converted to God, by their preaching ? "As long as these three marks concur in any, we believe he is called of God to preach." The probation of the preachers was at first one year; but was afterward extended to four.—The following minute of 1745 shows, that Mr. Charles Wesley was never consi¬ dered as coordinate with his brother in the government of the societies:— " Q. Should not my brother follnio me step by step, and Mr. Meriton (another clergyman) him ? "A. As far as possible." What Mr. Wesley was next to write, was a matter on which he asked the advice of the conference for several years.—A little stock of medicines, to be dispensed to the poor, was ordered to be provided for London, Bristol, and Newcastle. It is not generally known that Mr. Wesley pursued a course of regular medical study, whilst at Oxford.—Preachers werecautibned against giving out long hymns; and were exhorted to choose the tunes, that so they might be suitable to the hymn.—Copies of the minutes of the conference were to be written out and given to each member present: when the number of 176 LIFE OF THE preachers increased, printing was adopted.* In 1749, it seems to have been proposed that the societies every where should be considered one, of which the London society should be the mother church. This however came to nothing. The societies indeed were one, but the centre of union was first Mr. Wesley himself, then the conference of preachers. In the same year all chapels were directed to be built after the model of that of Rotherham, and the number of circuits, each very extensive, had increased to twenty-two.—Regular funds for the support of the preachers, and for aiding worn-out preachers, began now to be established.—A regular settlement of the chapels upon trustees had been enjoined in 1749 ; and in 1765, a person was appointed to be sent through England to survey the deeds, and supply wanting trustees.—All chapel windows were to be sashed ; no " tub pulpits" were to be allowed ; and men and women were every where to sit apart.—The societies are warned against little oaths, such as " my life," " my honour," &c, and against " com¬ pliments," and unmeaning words.—In general, many are reproved for talking too much, and reading too little.—In 1776, all octagon chapels ai'e directed to be built like that at Yarm ; and all square ones like that at Scarborough.— No Chinese paling was to be set up before any chapel; and the people are forbidden to crowd into the preacher^' houses, as though they were coffee houses.—No leaders* meeting was to be held without the presence of a preacher, and the spirit of debating at all meetings was to be strictly guarded against.—If bankrupts did not pay their debts when they are able, they were to be excluded the society. —Sluts were to be kept out of the preachers' houses, and cleanliness tvas held to be next to godliness. Thus to a number of little things among many greater and weightier matters, the active mind, the taste, and the orderly habits, of the founder of Methodism applied itself. Every thing was, however, kind and bland in his manner * Perhaps not more than one or two manuscript copies of the com¬ plete minutes of the conferences from 1744 to 1747 are in existence. That which lies before me, and from which extracts have been made in the preceding pages, wants* two or three of the first pages of the minutes of 1744. It was not written by Mr. Wesley; but is a copy oorrected by his own hand in different places. This is mentioned, as several of the extracts will be new even to some of the senior preachers^ REV. JOHN WESLEY. 177 of injunction ; and when he was disappointed as to the exact observance of his regulations, his displeasure was admirably proportioned to the weight of the case. No man generally knew better how to estimate the relative import¬ ance of things, and to give each its proper place and rank, although it would be to deny to him the infirmity of human nature to suppose that this rule of proportion was always observed. If little things were by him sometimes made great; this praise, however, he had without abatement, that he never made great things little. The notices of the deaths of the preachers year by year in the early Minutes, all bear the impress of the brevity and point of Mr. Wesley's style. The first time that the regular question, "What preachers have died this year V appears, is in the Minutes of 1777. A few sketches of character from this laconic obituary in different years, will illustrate his manner of keeping these annual records :— " Thomas Hosking, a young man, just entering on the work; zealous, active, and of an unblamable behaviour. And Richard Burke, a man of faith and patience, made perfect through sufferings : one who joined the wisdom and calmness of age, with the simplicity of childhood." " Richard Boardman, a pious, good-natured, sensible man, greatly beloved of all that knew him. He was one of the two first that freely offered themselves to the service of our brethren in America. He died of an apoplectic fit, and preached the night before his death. It seems he might have been eminently useful, but good is the will of the Lord. " Robert Swindells had been with us above forty years. He was an Israelite indeed. In all those years I never knew him to speak a word which he did not mean: and he always spoke the truth in love ; I believe, no one ever heard him speak an unkind word. He went through ex¬ quisite pain (by the stone) for many years; but he was not weary. He was still ' Patient in bearing ill, and doing well. " One thing he had almost peculiar to himself; he had no enemy! So remarkably was that word fulfilled, 'Blessed are the merciful; for they shall obtain mercy.' " James Barry was for many years a faithful labourer in our Lord's vineyard. And as he laboured much, so he 178 LIFE OF THE suffered much; but with unwearied patience. In his death he suffered nothing, stealing quietly away in a kind of lethargy. " Thomas Payne was a bold soldier of Jesus Christ. His temper was uncommonly vehement: but before he went hence, all that vehemence was gone, and the lion was become a lamb. He went away in the full triumph of faith, praising God with his latest breath. " Robert Naylor, a zealous, active young man, was caught away by a fever in the strength of his years. But it was in a good hour; for he returned to Him whom his soul loved, in the full assurance of faith. " A fall from his horse, which was at first thought of little consequence, occasioned the death of John Liver- more ; a plain, honest man, much devoted to G od, and determined to live and die in the best of services." "John Prickard, a man thoroughly devoted to God, and an eminent pattern of holiness: and Jacob Rowell, a faithful old soldier, fairly worn out in his Master's service." " Thomas Mitchell, an old soldier of Jesus Christ." " JohnFletcher, [vicar of Madeley,] a pattern of all holi¬ ness, scarce to be paralleled in a century ; and J. Peacock, young in years, but old in grace ; a pattern of all holiness, full of faith, and love, and zeal for God. " Jeremiah Robertshaw, who was a good soldier of Jesus Christ, fairly worn out in his Master's service. He was a pattern of patience for many years, labouring under sharp and almost continual pain, of meekness and gentle¬ ness to all men, and of simplicity and godly sincerity. "Joshua Keighley, who was a young man deeply devoted to God, and greatly beloved by all that knew him. He was " About the marriage state to prove, But death had swifter wings than love." " Charles Wesley, who, after spending fourscore years with much sorrow and pain, quietly retired into Abraham's bosom. He had no disease ; but after a gradual decay of some months, 'The weary wheels of life stood still at last.' His least praise was, his talent for poetry : although JDr. Watts did not scruple to say, that ' that single poem, REV. JOHN WESLEY. 179 Wrestling Jacob, was worth all the verses he himself had written.' " John Mayly, worn -out in the service of his Master : he suffered much in his last illness, and died triumphant in the Lord." Thus neither his brother Charles, nor Mr. Fletcher, had a longer eulogy than any other preacherso great was Mr. Wesley's love of brevity. The " care of the churches" now had come upon him, and was increasing ; he had a responsibility to man as well as to God for the right management of a people whom his labours and those of his coadjutors had formed into a body distinct from the National Church, and indeed as to all ecclesiastical control separate from it, although, in part, the members were attendants on her services. He was most anxious that this people should be raised to the high¬ est state of religious and moral excellence ; that they should be exemplary in all the relations of life, civil and domestic ; wise in the Scriptures; well read in useful books; self- denying in their conduct almost to severity ; and liberal in their charities, in order to which they were enjoined to abstain from all unnecessary indulgences, and to be plain and frugal in dress. They were expected to rise early to a religious service at five o'clock, and to attend some evening service, if possible, several times in the week; and, beside their own Sabbath meetings, to be punctual in observing the services of the Church. They were to add to all this the most zealous efforts to do good to the bodies and souls of those who were around them; and to per¬ severe in all these things with an ardour and an unwea- riedness equal to his own. With these great objects so strongly impressed upon his mind, that he should feel com¬ pelled to superintend every part of the system he had put into operation, and ^ttend to every thing great or little which he conceived to retard or accelerate its motion, was the natural consequence, and became with him matter 01 imperative conscience. A nobler object man could not propose to himself, than thus to spread the truth and the example of a living and practical Christianity through the land, and to revive the spirit of piety in a fallen Church, and among a neglected people; and he had sufficient proofs from the wonderful success which had followed. 180 EIFE OF THE success too of the most unequivocal kind, because the hearts of " multitude's had been turned to the Lord," that he was in the path of duty, and that the work was of God ; but the standard which he set up in his own mind and in his rules, both for his preachers and people, was so high, that, in the midst of all those refreshing joys which the review of the work often brought, feelings of disappoint¬ ment, and something like vexation, occasionally break forth in the Minutes of his conferences. On the preach¬ ers in their circuits an activity, an occupation of time, and an attention to various duties had been enjoined, similar to his own; but the regulations under which they were placed, were often minute, and in minor matters they were often failing, even when in other respects they most faithfully and laboriously fulfilled their ministry. Stewards, leaders, and trustees, come in also occasionally for their share of re¬ monstrance and rebuke on account of inattention ; whilst the societies, as being exposed to the various errors of the day, and to the ordinary influences of the temptations of an earthly state, sometimes declined, and then again revived ; in some places were negligent, and in others were almost every thing he could wish them to be, so that he could say with an Apostle respecting them, "Great is my glorying." To Mr. Wesley's frequent trials of patience were to be added the controversies, often very illiberal, in. which he was engaged, and the constant misrepresentations and per¬ secutions to which he and the societies were for many years exposed. When all these" things are considered, and when it is also recollected how much every man who him¬ self works by a strict method is apt to be affected by the irregularities and carelessness of others; the full and tranquil flow of his zeal and energy, and the temper, at once so strict and so mild, which breathes in the Minutes of the conferences, place him in a very admirable point of light. Yexation and disappointment passed over his serene mind like the light clouds over the bright summer field. The principle of an entire devotedness to serve God"; and " his generation according to the will of God," in him never relaxed ; and the words of one of his own beautiful hymns, to which in advanced life, in a conversation with a friend, he once alluded, as expressing his own pasf and habitual experience, were in him finely realized :-r— REV. JQHN WESLEY. 181 Jesus, confirm my heart's desire, To work, and. speak, and think for thee ; Still let me guard the holy fire, And still stir up thy gift in me. "Ready for all thy perfect will, My acts of faith, and love repeat. Till death thy endless mercies seal, And make the sacrifice complete." CHAPTER X. The doctrines and principal branches of the discipline of the body being generally settled, Mr. Wesley desisted from publishing extracts from the Minutes of the annual conferences from 1749 to 1765. In the Minutes of the latter year we find for the first time a published list of the circuits, and of the preachers.* The circuits were then twenty-five in England, extending from "Cornwall to New¬ castle-upon-Tyne ; in Scotland four; in Wales two; in Ireland eight; in all thirty-nine. The total number of the preachers, given up entirely to the work, and acting under Mr. Wesley's direction, had then risen to ninety-two. But it will be necessary to look back upon the labours of the two brothers during this interval. Instead, however, of tracing Mr. Wesley's journeys into various parts of the kingdom in detail from his Journals, which present one uniform and unwearied activity in his high calling, it will be sufficient to notice the principal incidents. Mr. Charles Wesley married in 1749, yet still continued his labours with but little abatement. He was in London at the time of the earthquake, and was preaching at the Foundery early in the morning when the second shock oc¬ curred. The entry in his Journal presents him in a sublime attitude, and may be given as an instance of what may be truly called the majesty of faith : " March 8th, 1750. This morning, a quarter after five, we had another shock of an earthquake far more violent than that of Februaiy Sth. I * In the manuscript copy of the first Minutes before mentioned, fists of circuits occasionally appear, as in 1746 :—"How many cir- cults are there ? Jlnswer.—Seven. 1. London, including Surrey and Kent. ' 2. Bristol, including Somersetshire, Portland, "Wiltshire,'Ox¬ fordshire and Gloucestershire. 3. Cornwall. 4. Evesham, including Shrewsbury,Leominster,Hereford, Stroud, andWednesbury. 5. Yom, including Yorkshire, Cheshire, Lancashire, Derbyshire, Nottingham¬ shire. and Lincolnshire. 6. Newcastle. 7. Wales." 16 182 LIFE OF THE was just repeating my text, when it shook the Foundery so violently, that we all expected it to fall on our heads. A great cry followed from the women and children. I imme¬ diately called out,' Therefore we will not fear, though the earth be moved, and the hills be carried into the midst of the sea; for the Lord of Hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge.' He filled my heart with faith, and my mouth with words, shaking their souls as well as their bodies. The earth moved westward, then eastward, then westward again, through all London and Westminster. It was a strong and jarring motion, attended with a rumbling noise like that of thunder. Many houses were much shaken, and some chimneys thrown down, but without any farther hurt." {Journal.) The impression produced in London by this visitation is thus recorded in a letter from Mr. Briggs to Mr. John Wesley:—" This great city has been, for some days past, under terrible apprehensions of another earthquake. Yes¬ terday, thousands fled out of town, it having been confi¬ dently asserted by a dragoon, that he had a revelation that great part of London, and Westminster especially, would be destroyed by an earthquake on the 4th instant between twelve and one at night. The whole city was under dire¬ ful apprehensions. Places of worship were crowded with frightened sinners, especially our two chapels, and the Ta¬ bernacle, where Mr. Whitefield preached. Several of the classes came to their leaders, and desired that they would spend the night with them in prayer ; which was done, and God gave them a blessing. Indeed all around was awful. Being not at all convinced of the prophet's mission, and having no call from any of my brethren, I went to bed at my usual time, believing I was safe in the hands of Christ; and likewise, that, by doing so, I should be the more ready to rise to the preaching in the morning ; which I did, prais¬ ed be my kind Protector." In a postscript he adds, " Though crowds left the town on Wednesday night, yet crowds were left behind; multitudes of whom, for fear of being suddenly overwhelmed, left their houses, and repair¬ ed to the fields, and open places in the city. Tower Hill, Moorfields, but above all, Hyde Park, were filled, the best part of the night, with men, women, and children, lament¬ ing. Some, with stronger imaginations than others, mostly REV. JOHN WESLEY. 183 women, ran crying in the streets, ' An earthquake! an earthquake!' Such distress, perhaps, is not recorded to have happened before in this careless city. Mr. White- field preached at midnight in Hyde Park. Surely God will visit this city; it will be a time of mercy to some. O may I be found watching!" ( Whitehead's Life.) So ready were these great preachers of the time to take advantage of every event by which they might lead men to God. One knows not which most to admire, Mr. White- field preaching at midnight in Hyde Park to a crowd of affrighted people, expecting the earth to swallow them up ; or Mr. Charles Wesley, with the very ground reeling under him, calling out to the congregation, " Therefore will we not fear, though the earth be moved, and the hills be car¬ ried into the midst of the sea; for the Lord of Hosts is with us ; the God of Jacob is our refuge and using this as his text. The detected immorality and expulsion of one of the preachers, James Wheatley,* led the brothers to determine upon instituting a more strict inquiry into the life and be¬ haviour of every preacher in connection with them. Mr, Charles Wesley undertook that office, as being perhaps more confident in his own discernment of character, and less influenced by affection to the preachers. The result was, however, highly creditable to them, for no irregularity of conduct was detected; but as the visitation was not con¬ ducted, to say the least pf it, in the bland manner in which it would have been executed by Mr. John Wesley, who was indeed alone regarded as the father of the Connection, it led, as might be expected, to bickerings. Many of the preachers did not come up to Mr. Charles Wesley's no¬ tions of attachment to the Church; some began to wish a little larger share in the government; and a few did not * Mr. Wesley has been censured by some persons for sanctioning the publication of a pamphlet on the11 Duties of Husbands and Wives," written, as they suppposed, by this wretched man, and especially for doing this after the misconduct of the author had been brought to light. But the charge is without foundation. The pamphlet in question was not written by James Wheatley, the preacher, but by William Whate- ley, the Puritan minister of Banbury; a man of the most exemplary piety, and one of the best practical writers of his age, who died in 1639. The work from which the pamphlet was extracted is entitled, " A Bride-Bush," and bears the date of 1619 • which was at least a hun¬ dred years before Wheatley was born. 184 LIFE OF THE rise to his standard of ministerial abilities, although of this he judged only by report. From this time a stronger feel¬ ing of disunion between the preachers and him grew up, which ultimately led to his taking a much less active part in the affairs of the body, except to interfere occasionally with his advice, and, in still later years, now and then to censure the increasing irregularity of his brother's proceed¬ ings. The fact was, Mr. John Wesley was only carried forward by the same stream which had impelled both the brothers irretrievably far beyond the line prescribed to regular Churchmen ; and Charles was chafing himself with the vain attempt to buffet back the tide, or at least to ren¬ der it stationary. He saw, no doubt, during the visitation which he had lately undertaken, a growing tendency to separation from the Church both among many of the preach¬ ers and the people, which, although it was the natural,, nay, almost necessary, result of the circumstances in which they were placed, he somewhat uncandidly attributed to the ambition of the former; and, laying it down as a neces¬ sary qualification, that no preacher ought to be employed without giving some explicit pledge as to his purpose of adherence to the Church, he attempted to associate him¬ self with his brother in the management, with equal power to call preachers into the work, and then to govern them. He appears laudably to have wished to improve their talents ; but he proposed also greatly to restrict their num¬ ber, and to subject them to stricter tests as to their attach¬ ment to the Establishment. Here began an important difference between the two brothers. Some impression w;as made upon the mind of Mr. John Wesley by his bro¬ ther's letters written to him during his tour of inquisition, principally as they exaggerated the growing danger of sepa¬ ration from the Church; and upon Charles's return to London, John was persuaded, although " with difficulty," to sign an agreement, engaging that no preacher should be called into the work except by both of them conjointly, nor any readmitted but with mutual consent. The" intention of Charles was evidently to obtain a controlling power over his brother's proceedings ; but there was one great rule to which Mr. John Wesley was more steadily faithful. This was to carry on and extend that which he knew to be the work of God, without regarding probable future conse- REV. JOHN WESLEY. 185 quences of separation from the Church after his death ;* which was in fact the principle on which they had agreed at the first conference of 1774, (See pages 115,116,) and to which Charles stood pledged as fully as himself. It seems, therefore, that when Mr. John Wesley more fully discovered his brother's intention to restrict the number of preachers, under the plea of employing only men of supe¬ rior abilities ; and more especially after all that had passed between Charles and them during the inquisitorial visita¬ tion just named had been reported to him, he felt little disposed to assent to his having co-authority with himself in the management of the Connection; and Charles with¬ drawing more from public life, the government remained with J ohn still more exclusively than before. This acqui¬ sition of entire authority, as it has been called, has been referred to by one of Mr. Wesley's biographers as a proof of his ambition, and his inability to bear a rival. The affec¬ tion of the brothers itself affords a. strong presumption against the existence of any such jealousy between them : and beside we find no previous instance of a single strug¬ gle for authority. But the fact was, that John always led the way, as sole director, with Charles as a confidential adviser ; and they long acted together in this relation as with one soul. In the present case it was Charles only who grasped at a power which he had not previously pos¬ sessed ; and this was for a moment yielded, though hesi¬ tatingly, upon an ex parte statement, and under views not fully manifested. When, however, those were disclosed, John recoiled ; and his brother, by a partial secession from the work, left the whole care of it upon his hands. Mr. Charles Wesley had indeed, some time before this, rather hastily interposed to prevent the marriage of his brother with a very pious and respectable woman, Mrs. Grace Murray, to whom he was attached, and that probably under the influence of a little family pride, as she was not in an elevated rank of life ;j" and this affair, in which there ap¬ pears to have been somewhat of treachery, although no * " Church or no Church," he observes in one of his letters to Charles, " we must attend to the work of saving souls." And in another, " I neither set it up, nor pull it down; but let you and I build the city of God." | Mr. Charles Wesley and Mr. Whitefield got the lady hastily married to Mr. Bennett, one of the preachers, whilst his brother was 16* 186 LIFE OF THE doubt well intended, had for the first time interrupted their harmony. But it is not at all likely that any feeling of re¬ sentment remained in the mind of John; and indeed the commission of visitation, with which Charles had been invested, was a sufficient proof that confidence had been at a distance, probably not being himself aware, any more than she, of the strength of his attachmeht. The following extract from one of Mr. Wesley's unpublished letters shows, however, that he deeply felt it;—"The sons of Zeruiah were too strong for me. The whole world fought against me, but, above all, my oion familiar friend. Then was the word fulfilled, ' Son of man, behold, I take from thee the desire of thine eyes at a stroke, yet shalt thou not lament, neither shall thy tears run down.' The fatal, irrecoverable stroke was struck on Thursday last. Yesterday I saw my friend, (that was,) and him to whom she is sacrificed. ' But why should a living man complain, a man for the punishment of his sins?"' The following passages, from a letter of the venerable vicar of Shoreham to Mr. Charles, intimate how much he sympathized with Mr. John Wesley on the occasion, and how anxious he was to prevent a breach between the brothers, which this, certainly unbrotherly, act, the only one into which Charles seems to have been betrayed, was near producing. The letter is dated, Shoreham, 1749:—"Yours came this day to hand. I leave you to guess how such news must affect a person whose very soul is one with yours, and our friend. Let me conjure you to soothe his sorrows. Pour nothing but oil and wine into his wounds. Indulge no views, no designs, but what tend to the honour of God, the promoting the kingdom of his dear Son, and the healing of our wounded friend How would the Philistines rejoice Could they hear that Saul and Jonathan were in danger from their own swords!" » I have seen an explanation of Mr. Charles Wesley's conduct in this affair by the late Miss Wesley; but as the matter occurred before her birth, I have much doubt as to her perfect knowledge of the circum¬ stances, so that I shall not fully state it. She lays the fault chiefly on the lady's want of explicitness; states that she had formed a previous, but concealed, attachment to Mr. Bennett; and that Mr. Charles having discovered this, he hastened the marriage. Whatever the ostensible reason might be, it was no doubt eagerly seized by Mr. Charles Wesley as an occasion of breaking off a match, which he appears some time before to have interfered with, influ¬ enced, it is most probable, by the consideration of Mrs. Murray's inferior rank. From this feeling Mr. John Wesley was much more exempt, as the following anecdote, found in one of Miss Wesley's let¬ ters, indicates in a way very creditable to his amiable temper:—"My brother Charles had an attachment in early youth to an. amiable girl of inferior birth; this was much opposed by my mother and her family, who mentioned it with concern to my uncle. Finding from my father that this was the chief objection, my uncle only replied, ' Then there is no family blood ? I hear the girl is good; but of no family ?' 'Nor fortune either,' said my mother. He made no reply; but sent my brother a sum of money as a wedding present; and I believe sincerely regretted that he was ultimately crossed in his inclination." REV. JOHN WESLEY. 187 Testored. The true reason of the difference was, that the one wished to contract the work, from fear of the probable consequence of separation from the Church; the other pursued his course of enlarging and extending it, resolving to prevent separation to the best of his power, but leaving that issue in higher hands. Still, however, the affection of the brothers remained unimpaired. In the year 1751, as Mr. Wesley was still resolved to marry, believing that his usefulness would be thereby pro¬ moted, he took to wife, Mrs. Vizelle, a widow lady of independent fortune. She was a woman of a cultivated understanding, as her remaining letters testify; and that she appeared to Mr. Wesley to possess every other qualifi¬ cation, which promised to increase both his usefulness and happiness, we may conclude from his having made choice of her as his companion. We must suppose, also, that as he never intended to relax his labours, and adopt a more settled mode of life, this matter also was fully understood, and agreed to before marriage. But whatever good quali¬ ties Mrs. Wesley might appear to have, they were at length wholly swallowed up in the fierce passion of jealousy. For some time she travelled with him; but becoming weary of this, and not being able 4o bind him down to a more domestic life, this passion increased. The violence of her temper broke out also against Mr. Charles Wesley and his wife. This arose from very trifling circumstances, magnified into personal slights ; and various unpleasant scenes are mentioned in Mr. Charles Wesley's unpublished letters, and described with a sprightliness which, whilst it shows that he was unconscious of having given her any just cause of offence, equally indicates the absence of sympathy. Perhaps this had been worn out by the long continuance of her caustic attacks upon him and his family, both by word and by letter. Certainly Mr. Charles Wes¬ ley must have felt her to be an annoying correspondent, if we may judge from some of her letters still preserved, and in which, singular as it may appear, she zealously contends for her husband's superiority, and is indignant that he should be wearing himself out with excessive labour, whilst Charles was remaining at home in ease. Dr. Southey has candidly and justly stated the matter between her and her persecuted husband :— 188 LIFE OF THE " Had Mrs. Wesley been capable of understanding her husband's character, she could not possibly have been jealous; but the spirit of jealousy possessed her, and drove her to the most unwarrantable actions. It is said that she frequently travelled a hundred miles for the purpose of watching, from a window, who was in the carriage with him when he entered a town. She searched his pockets, opened his letters, put his letters and papers into the hands of his enemies, in hopes that they might be made use of to blast his character, and sometimes laid violent hands upon him and tore his hair. She frequently left his house, and, upon his earnest entreaties, returned again ; till, after having thus disquieted twenty years of his life, as far as it was possible for any domestic vexations to disquiet a man whose life was passed in loco-motion, she seized on part of his Journals, and many other papers, which were never restored, and departed, leaving word that she never in¬ tended to return. He simply states the fact in his Journal, saying, that he knew not what the cause had been; and he briefly adds, Non earn reliqui, non dimisi, non revocabo; ' I did not forsake her, I did not dismiss her, I will not recall her.' " (Southey's Life.) The worst part of Mrs. Wesley's conduct, and which only the supposition of a degree of insanity, excited by jealousy, can palliate, was that she interpolated several letters, which she had intercepted, so as to make them bear a bad construction ; and as Mr. Wesley had always main¬ tained a large correspondence with all classes of persons, and among others with pious females, in some of whose letters there were strong expressions of Christian affection, she availed herself of this means of defaming him. Some of these she read to different persons in private, and espe¬ cially to Mr. Wesley's opponents and enemies, adding extempore passages in the same tone of voice, but taking care not to allow the letters themselves to be read by the auditors; and in one or two instances she published interpolated or forged letters in the public- prints. How he conducted himself amidst these vexations, the follow¬ ing passages in a letter from Miss Wesley to a friend, written a little before her death, will show. They are at once important as explanatory of the kind of annoy¬ ance to which this unhappy marriage subjected her uncle. REV. JOHN WESLESf. IS9 and as containing an anecdote strongly illustrative of his character:— "I think it was in the year 1775 my uncle promised to take me with him to Canterbury and Dover. About this time Mrs. Wesley had obtained some letters which she used to the most injurious purposes, misinterpreting spirit¬ ual expressions, and interpolating words. These she read to some Calvinists, and they were to be sent to the Morn¬ ing Post. A Calvinist gentleman, who esteemed my father and uncle, came to the former, and told him that, for the sake of religion-, the publication should be stopped, and Mr. John Wesley be allowed to answer for himself. As Mrs. Wesley had read, but did not show, the letters to him, he had some doubts of their authenticity; and though they were addressed to Mr. John Wesley, they might be forgeries ; at any rate he ought not to leave town at such a juncture, but clear the matter satisfactorily. " My dear father, to whom the reputation of my uncle was far dearer than his own, immediately saw the import¬ ance of refutation, and set off to the Foundery to induce him to postpone his journey, while I, in my own mind, was lamenting such a disappointment, having anticipated it with all the impatience natural to my years. Never shall I forget the manner in which my father accosted my mother on his return home. ' My brother,' says he, ' is indeed an extraordinary man. I placed before him the importance of the character of a minister ; the evil conse¬ quences which might result from his indifference to it; the cause of religion ; stumbling blocks cast in the way of the weak; and urged him by every relative and public motive to answer for himself, and stop the publication. His reply was, Brother, when I devoted to God my ease, my time, my life, did I except my reputation? No. Tell Sally I will take her to Canterbury to-morrow.' " I ought to add, that the letters in question were satis¬ factorily proved to be mutilated, and no scandal resulted from his trust in God." Some of these letters mutilated, interpolated, or forged by this unhappy woman, have got into different hands, and are still preserved. In the papers of the Wesley family, recently collected, there are, however, sufficient materials for a full explanation of the whole case in detail; but as 190 LIFE OF TIIE Mr. Wesley himself spared it, no one will, I presume, ever farther disturb this unpleasant affair, unless some publica¬ tion on the part of an enemy, for the sake of gain, or to gratify a party feeling, should render it necessary to defend the character of this holy and unsuspecting man.* A school at Kingswood, near Bristol, for the children of the poor, had been long built; but that neighbourhood was also fixed upon by Mr. Wesley for an institution, in which the sons of the preachers, and those of the richer Method¬ ists, should receive at once the best education, and the most efficient religious training. It was opened in June, 1748, and he published soon after a " Short Account" of the institution, with the plan of education adopted, par¬ ticularly for those who were to remain so long in it as to go through a course of academical learning; and adds, " Whoever carefully goes through this course will be a * The following passage, in a letter from Mr. Perronet, to Mr. Charles Wesley, dated Shoreham, Nov. 3, 1752, shows that Mr. Wes¬ ley's matrimonial afflictions must have commenced a very short time after marriage:—" I am truly concerned that matters are in so melan¬ choly a situation. I think the unhappy lady is most to'be pitied, though the gentleman's case is mournful enough. Their sufferings proceed from widely different causes. His are the visible chastise¬ ments of a loving Father. Her's the immediate effects of an angry, bitter spirit; and, indeed, it is a sad consideration, that, after so many months have elapsed, the same warmth and bitterness should remain." This truly venerable and holy man died in 1785, in the ninety-second year of his age. Two days before his cfeath, his grand-daughter, Miss Briggs, who attended him day and night, read to him the three last chapters, of Isaiah. He then desired her to go into the garden, to take a little fresh air. Upon her return, she found him in an ecstacy, with the tears running down his cheeks, from a deep and lively sense of the glorious things which she had just been reading to him; and which, he believed, would shortly be fulfilled in a still more glorious sense than heretofore. He continued unspeakably happy all that day. On Sunday, his happiness seemed even to increase, till he retired to rest. Miss Briggs then went into the room to see if any thing was wanting; and as she stood at the feet of the bed, he smiled and said, "God bless thee, my dear child, and all that belongs to thee! Yea, he will bless thee!" This he earnestly repeated till she left the room. When she went in the next morning, his happy spirit had returned to God! Mr. Perronet, like those great and good men, Messrs. Grimshaw and Fletcher, continued steadily attached to Mr. Wesley and to the Methodists. He received the preachers joyfully, fitted up a room in the parsonage house for their use, and attended their ministry himself at every opportunity. His house was one of the regular places of the Kent circuit, and so continued to the day of his death. All his family were members of the society, and two of his sons preachers. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 191 better scholar than nine in ten of the graduates at Oxford and Cambridge." In this great and good design he grasped at too much; and the school came in time to be confined to the sons of the preachers, and ceased, as at first, to re¬ ceive boarders. Indeed, from the increase of the preachers' families, the school was rapidly filled, and required enlarge¬ ment at different times; and finally it was necessarry to establish a second school at Woodhouse Grove, in York¬ shire. The circumstance of the preachers being so much from home, and removing every one or two years from their circuits, rendered an institution of this kind impera¬ tive ; and, as it necessarily grew out of the system of itine¬ rancy, it was cheerfully and liberally, though often inade¬ quately, supported by private subscriptions, and a public annual collection throughout all the congregations. The most gratifying moral results have followed ; and a useful and religious education has been secured to the sons of the preachers, many of whom, especially of late years, having afforded undeniable proofs of genuine conversion, and of a divine call to public labours in the church of Christ, have been admitted into the ministry, and are among its highest ornaments, or its brightest hopes. It is however to be regretted that the original plan of Mr. Wesley, to found an institution for the connection at large, which should unite the advantages of a school and a college, has not been resumed in later and more favourable times. Yarious circumstances, at that early period, militated against the success of this excellent project, which have gradually dis¬ appeared ; and if in that infant state of the cause, Mr. Wesley wisely thought that Methodism should provide for all its wants, religious and educational, within itself; much more incumbent is it to do so now. Many of the sons of our friends, for want of such a provision, have been placed m schools where their religious principles have been ne¬ glected or perverted; and too often have been taught to ridicule, or to be ashamed of, the religious profession of their fathers.* [* The striking application of the above remarks to the state of things in relation to Methodism in this country, cannot escape the observation of intelligent readers; and it is no little gratification to perceive that the testimony of both Mr. Wesley's and Mr. Watson's approbation stahds thus recorded in support of the views which, with uiany others of our brethren in America, we have steadily entertained 192 LIFE OF THE In 1753, Mr. Wesley visited Scotland a second time, and preached at Glasgow to large congregations. He had gone there on the invitation of that excellent man, Dr. Gillies, minister of the College kirk, who, a few days after he left, wrote to him as follows :—" The singing of hymns here meets with greater opposition than I expected. Seri¬ ous people are much divided. Those of better under¬ standing and education are silent; but many others are so prejudiced, especially at the singing publicly, that they speak openly against it, and look upon me as led to do a very wrong or sinful thing. I beg your advice, whether to answer them only by continuing in the practice of the thing, with such as have freedom to join, looking to the Lord for a blessing upon his own ordinance : or, if I should publish a sheet of arguments from reason, and Scripture, and the example of the godly. Tour experience of the most effectual way of dealing with people's prejudices, makes your advice on this head of the greater importance. " I bless the Lord for the benefit and comfort of your acquaintance, for your important assistance in my His¬ torical Collections, and for your edifying conversation and sermons in this place. May our gracious God prosper you wherever you are. 0 my dear sir, pray for your brother, that I may be employed in doing something for the ad¬ vancement of His glory, who has done so much for me, and who is my only hope." This prejudice in favour of their own doggerel version of the Psalms of David generally remains among the Scotch to this day; and even in the Wesleyan societies raised up there, great opposition was at first made to the use of hymns. The Historical Collections of Dr. Gillies, mentioned in his letter, do justice to that revival of religion in this country of which Methodism was the instrument, and gives many valuable accounts of similar revivals, and special effusions of the Holy Spirit upon the churches of Christ in different ages. The following extracts from two of Mr. Wesley's letters and frequently expressed, on this important subject. The public developments recently made of the fatal consequences of sending Pro¬ testant youth to seminaries under the direction of Papists especially, are worthy of the deepest and most .serious consideration.—(Amer. Edit.] REV. JOHN WESLEY. 193 written about this time, show how meekly this admirable man could take reproof; and with how patient a temper he could deal with peevish and complaining men. " You give," says he, " five reasons why the Rev. Mr. P will come no more amongst us: 1. ' because we despise the ministers of the Church of England.' This I flatly deny. I am answering letters this very post, which bitterly blame me for just the contrary. 2. ' Because so much backbiting and evil-speaking is suffered amongst our people.' It is4not suffered ; all possible means are usedT both to prevent and remove it. 3. 4 Because I, who have written so much against hoarding up money, have put out seven hundred pounds to interest.'—I never put sixpence out to interest since I was born; nor had I ever one hun¬ dred pounds together, my own, since I came into the world. 4. ' Because our lay preachers have told many stories of my brother and me.' If they did, I am sorry for them: when I hear the particulars I can answer, and perhaps make those ashamed who believed them. 5. ' Because we did not help a friend in distress.'—We did help him as far as we were able. 4 But we might have made his case known to Mr. G , Lady H , &c.' So we did, more than once; but we could not pull money from them, whether they would or no. Therefore these reasons are of no weight. You conclude with praying, that God would re¬ move pride and malice from amongst us. Of pride I have too much; of malice I have none : however, the prayer is good, and I thank you for it." The other letter from which I shall give an extract was written apparently to a gentleman of some rank and influ¬ ence :—" I do not recollect, for I kept no oopy of my last, that I charged you with want of humility, or meekness. Doubtless these may be found in the most splendid palaces. But did they ever move a man to build a splendid palace ? Upon what motive you did this, I know not; but you are to answer it to God, not to me. " If your soul is as much alive to God, if your thirst after pardon and holiness is as strong, if you are as dead to the desire of the eye and the pride of life, as you were six or seven years ago, I rejoice; if not, I pray God you may; and then you will know how to value a real friend, 17 194 LIFE OF THE "With regard to myself, you do well to warn me against ' popularity, a thirst of power and of applause; against envy, producing a seeming contempt for the conveniences or grandeur of this life ; against an affected humility ; against sparing from myself to give to others, from no other motive than ostentation.' I am not conscious to myself, that this is my case. However the warning is always friendly; and it is always seasonable, considering how deceitful my heart is, and how many the enemies that surround me.—What follows I do not understand :—'You behold me in the ditch, wherein you helped, though inno¬ cently, to cast me, and with a Levitical pity pass by on the other side. He and you, sir, have not any merit, though Providence should permit all these sufferings to work together for my good.'—I do not comprehend one line of this, and therefore cannot plead either guilty, or not guilty. I presume, they are some that are dependent on me, who, you say, 'keep not the commandments of God ; who show a repugnance to serve and obey ; who are as full of pride and arrogance, as of filth and nastiness; who do not pay lawful debts, not comply with civil obligations; who make the waiting on the offices of religion, a plea for sloth and idleness; who, after I had strongly recommended them, did not perform their moral duty, but increased the number of those incumbrances which they forced on you, against your will.'—To this I can only say, 1. I know not wnom you mean; I am not certain that I can so much as guess at one of them. 2. Whoever they are, had they followed my instructions, they would have acted in a quite different manner. 3. If you will tell me them by name, I will re¬ nounce all fellowship with them." In the autumn of 1753, Mr. Wesley was threatened with consumption, brought on by repeated attacks of cold. By the advice of Dr. Fothergill he retired to Lewisham ; and here, not knowing how it might please God to dispose of him, and wishing "to prevent vile panegyric" in case of death, he wrote his Epitaph as follows REV. JOHN WESLEY. 195 1$tu tfetlj the body of john wesley, a brand plucked out of the burning; who died of a consumption in the fifty-first year of his age. not leaving, after his debts are paid, ten pounds behind him : praying, God be merciful to me an unprofitable servant! He ordered that this, if any, inscription, should be placed on his tomb-stone During Mr. Wesley's illness, Mr. Whitefield wrote to him in a strain which shows the fulness of affection which existed between those great and good men, notwithstand¬ ing their differences of opinion :— "Bristol, Dec. 3, 1753. " Rev. and very Dear Sir,—If seeing you so weak when leaving London distressed me, the news and pros¬ pect of your approaching dissolution hath quite weighed me down. I pity myself and the church, but not you. A radiant throne awaits you, and ere long you will enter into your Master's joy. Yonder he stands with a massy crown, ready to put it on your head, amidst an admiring throng of saints and angels. But I, poor I, that have been waiting for my dissolution these nineteefi ySars, must be left behind to grovel here below! Well! this is my comfort: it can¬ not be long ere the chariots will be sent even for worthless me. If prayers can detain them, even you, Rev. and very dear sir, shall not leave us yet: but if the decree has gone forth, that you must now fall asleep in Jesus, may he kiss your soul away, and give you to die in the embraces of triumphant love ! If in the land of the dying, I hope to pay my last respects to you next Week. If not, Rev. and very dear sir, F—a—r—e—w—e—11. Ego sequar, etsi non passibus oequis.* My heart is too big, tears trickle down too fast, and you are, I fear, too weak for me to enlarge. Underneath you may there be Christ's everlasting arms! I commend you to his never failing mercy, and am, Rev. and very dear sir, your most affectionate, sympa¬ thizing, and afflicted younger brother in the Gospel of our common Lord, " G. Whitefield." * "I shall follow, though not with equal steps." 196 LIFE OF THE From Lewisham he removed to the Hot Wells, near Bristol; and, ever intent upon improving time, began his Notes on the New Testament. For some time after this, he appears to have remained in an invalid state. During his retirement at Paddington he read a work which made a forcible attack upon his prejudices as a Churchman; and soon afterward, another, which still farther shook the de¬ ference he had once been disposed to pay to ecclesiastical antiquity. " In my hours of walking, I read Dr. Calamy's Abridg- ment.of Mr. Baxter's Life. What a scene is opened there! In spite of all my prejudices of education, I could not but see, that the poor Nonconformists had been used without either justice or mercy; and that many of the Protestant bishops of King Charles had neither more religion nor humanity than the Popish bishops of Queen Mary." " I read Mr. Baxter's History of the Councils. It is utterly astonishing, and would be wholly incredible, but that his vouchers are beyond all exception. What a com¬ pany of execrable wretches have they been, (one cannot justly give them a milder title,) who have, almost in every age since St. Cyprian, taken upon them to govern the church! How has one council been perpetually cursing another; and delivering atl over to Satan, whether prede¬ cessors or contemporaries, who did not implicitly receive their determinations, though generally trifling, sometimes false, and frequently unintelligible, or self-contradictory! Surely Mohammedanism was let loose to reform the Chris¬ tians ! I know not but Constantinople has gained by the change." During Mr. Wesley's illness, Mr. Charles Wesley went forth to visit the societies, and to supply his brother's place. In 1755, at the conference held in Leeds, a subject which had been frequently stirring itself, was formally discussed:— " The point on which we desired all the preachers to speak their minds at large, was, whether we ought to se¬ parate from the Church. Whatever was advanced on one side or the other was seriously and calmly considered: and on the third day we were all fully agreed in that gene¬ ral conclusion, that, whether it wa3 lawful or not, it was no ways expedient." REV. JOHN WESLEY. 197 Part of the preachers were, without restraint, permitted to speak in favour of a measure which in former confer¬ ences would not have been listened to in the shape of discussion; and the conclusion was, that the question of the lawfulness of separation was evaded, and the whole matter was reduced to " expediency." Of this confer¬ ence we have no Minutes ; but where was Mr. Charles Wesley 1* Mr. Charles Perronet and some others, for whom Mr. Wesley had great respect, were at this time urging him to make full provision for the spiritual wants of his people, as being in fact in a state of real and hopeless separation from the .Church ; and he did some years after¬ ward so far relax, as to allow of preaching in Church hours under certain circumstances, as 1. When the minister was wicked; or held pernicious doctrine; 2. When the churches would not contain the population of a town ; or where the church was distant. In that case he prescribed reading the psalms and lessons and part of the liturgy. And for this purpose, as well as for the use of the American! societies, he published his Abridgment of• the Common Prayer under the title of the " Sunday Service of the Methodists." In 1756 he printed an Address^ to the Clergy, plain, affectionate, and powerful; breathing at once the spirit of an Apostle, and the feeling of a brother. Happy if that call had been heard! He might perhaps be influenced in this by a still lingering hope of a revival of the spirit of zeal and piety among the ministers of the Established Church; in which case that separation of his people from the Church, which he began to foresee as otherwise inevi¬ table, he thought might be prevented ; and this he had undoubtedly much at heart. Under the same view it proba¬ bly was that in 1764 he addressed a circular to all the serious clergy whom he knew, inviting them to a closer cooperation in promoting the influence of religion in the land, without any sacrifice of opinion,, and being still at liberty, as to outward order, to remain "quite regular, or * Three years after Mr. Wesley published twelve reasons against separation, all however of a prudential kind. To these Mr. Charles Wesley added his separate testimony; but as to himself, he adds that he thought it not lawfxd. Here then was another difference in the, views of the brothers. 17* 198 LIFE OF THE quite irregular, or partly regular and partly irregular." Of the thirty-four clergymen addressed, only three returned any answer. This seems to have surprised both him and some of his biographers. The reason is, however, very obvious : Mr. Wesley did not propose to abandon his plan and his preachers, or to get the latter ordained and settled in curacies, as proposed a few years before by Mr. Walker of Truro ; and the matter had now obviously gone too far for the clergy to attach themselves to Methodism. They saw, with perhaps clearer eyes than Mr. Wesley's, that the Methodists could not now be embodied in the Church; and that for them to cooperate directly with him, would only be to partake of his reproach, and to put difficulties in their own way, to which they had not the same call. A few clergymen, and but a few, still continued to give him, with fulness of heart, the right hand of fellowship, and to cooperate in some degree with him. Backward he could not go ; but the forward career of still more extended use¬ fulness was before him. From this time he gave up all hope of a formal connection with even the pious clergy. " They are," he observes, " a rope of sand, and such they will continueand he therefore set himself with deep seriousness to perpetuate the union of his preachers. At the conference of 1769, he read a paper, the object ol which was to bind the preachers together by a closer tie, and to provide for the continuance of their union after his death. They were to engage solemnly to devote them¬ selves to God, to preach the old Methodist doctrines, and to maintain the whole Methodist discipline; after Mr. Wes¬ ley's death they were to repair to London, and those who chose to act in concert were to draw up articles of agree¬ ment ; whilst such as did not so agree were to be dismissed "in the most friendly way possible." They were then to choose a committee by vote, each of the members of which was to be moderator io his turn, and this committee was to enjoy Mr. Wesley's power of proposing preachers to be admitted or excluded, of appointing their stations for the ensuing year, and of fixing the time of the next conference. This appears to have been the first sketch of an ecclesias¬ tical constitution for the body, and it mainly consisted in the entire delegation of the power which Mr. Wesley had always exercised, to a committee of preachers to be chosen REV. JOHN WESLEY. 199 by the rest when assembled in conference. The form of government he thus proposed was therefore a species of Episcopacy to be exercised by a committee of three, five, or seven, as the case might be. Another and a more eligi¬ ble provision was subsequently made; but this sufficiently shows that Mr. Wesley had given up all hope of union with the Church; and his efforts were henceforth directed merely to prevent any thing like formal separation, and the open renunciation of her communion, during his own life, by allowing his preachers to administer the sacraments. About this time much prejudice was excited against Mr. Wesley in Scotland by the republication of Hervey's Eleven Letters. He had three times visited this coun¬ try; and, preaching only upon the fundamental truths of Christianity, had been received with great affection. The societies had increased, and several of his preachers were stationed in different towns. Lady Frances Gardiner, the widow of Colonel Gardiner, and other persons eminent for piety and rank, attended the Methodist ministry; but the publication of this wretched work caused a temporary odium. Hervey, who had been one of the little band at Oxford, became a Calvinist; and as his notions grew more rigid with age, so his former feelings of gratitude and friendship to Mr. Wesley were blunted. He had also fallen into the hands of Cudworth, a decided Antinomian, who " put in and out" of the Letters " what he pleased." They were not, however, published until Hervey's death, and against his dying injunction. It is just to so excellent a man to record this fact; but the work was published in England, and republished, with a violent preface by Dr. Erskine, in Scotland; and among the Calvinists it produced the effect of inspiring great horror of Mr. Wesley as a most pestilent heretic, whom it was doing God service to abuse without measure or modesty. The feelings of Mr. Charles Wesley at this treatment of his brother may be gathered from the answer he returned upon being requested to write Hervey's Epitaph:— on being desired to write an epitaph for mr. james hervey. " O'er-reach'd, impell'd by a sly Gnostick's art, 1*0 stab his father, guide, and faithful friend, Would pious Hervey act the accuser's part? And could a life like his in- malice end ? 200 life of the " No: by redeeming love the snare is broke; In death his rash ingratitude he blames; Desires and wills the evil to revoke, And dooms the unfinish'd libel to the flames. " Who then for filthy gain betray'd his trust, And show'd a kinsman's fault in open light ? Let him adorn the monumental bust,— The' encomium fair in brass or marble write: Or if they need a nobler trophy raise, As long as Theron and Aspasio live, Let Madan or Romaine record his praise; Enough that Wesley's brother can forgive The unfavourable impression made by Hervey's Letters, surcharged by Cudworth's Antinomian venom, was how¬ ever quickly effaced from all but the bigots; and with them, judging from Moncrief's Life of Erskine, it remains to this day. In his future visits to Scotland Mr. Wesley was received with marks of the highest respect, and at Perth he had the freedom of the city handsomely conferred upon him. CHAPTER XL Methodism having begun to make some progress in America, in consequence of the emigration of some of the * Mr. Charles Wesley, however, afterward wrote and published some verses upon Mr. Hervey's death, in which the kind recollections of old friendship are embodied, and the anticipations of a happy meeting in heaven are sweetly expressed. The following are the concluding stanzas:— " Father, to us vouchsafe the grace, Which brought our friend victorious through: Let us his shining footsteps trace, Let us his steadfast faith pursue; Follow this follower of the Lamb, And conquer all through Jesus' name. " Free from the law of sin and death, Free from the Antinomian leaven, He led his Master's life beneath; And, labouring for the rest of heaven, By active love and watchful prayer, Efe show'd his heart already there. " O might we all, like him, believe, And keep the faith, and win the prize! Father, prepare and. then receive Our hallow'd spirits to the skies, To chant with all our friends above, Thy glorious, everlasting love." REV. JOHN WESLEY. 201 members of the society from England and Ireland,* Mr. Wesley inquired of the preachers at the conference of 1769, whether any of them would embark in that service. Messrs. Boardman and Pilmoor, two excellent men, of good gifts, volunteered their services, and were sent to take the charge of the societies. From this time the work spread with great rapidity; more than twenty preachers had devoted themselves to it previously to the war of inde¬ pendence ; and societies were raised up in Maryland, Virginia, New-York, and Pennsylvania."f* During the war they still prosecuted their labours ; though as several of them took the side of the mother country, they were exposed to danger.J Others, with more discretion, held on their way in silence, speaking only of the things of God. The warm loyalty of Mr. Wesley led him to pub¬ lish a pamphlet on the subject of the quarrel, entitled, [* Ireland seems to have had the SDecial honour of furnishing the chief instruments in forming the first Methodist societies in America. Mr. Philip Embury, who formed the first permanent society in the city of New-York, in 1766, and Mr. Robert Strawbridge, in Frederick county, Maryland, in the same year, were both from Ireland.—Ame¬ rican Edit.] i [j New-Jersey, and we think Delaware, oWght to be added here, and in 1776 a circuit was formed in North Carolina also. Delaware especially ought ever ,to be honoured by us for her generous and early protection afforded to Methodism in the time of its greatest trial. It was within that small state, where the laws, (to quote the words of Mr. Cooper,) were more favourable, and the rulers and influential men more friendly, that Mr. Asbury, when the storm of the revolu¬ tionary war was at its height, and persecution raged furiously, found an asylum in the house of his never to be forgotten friend Judge White. —American Edit.] [] Some of the English preachers did act imprudently in this respect, and were under the necessity, in consequence, of leaving America. Mr. Asbury's course was marked " with more discretionwhich we are happy to perceive is also Mr. Watson's view of the subject. Of the American preachers, there is no evidence within our knowledge that any of them " took the side of the mother countryalthough some of them, as well as of the members, were subjected to suspicion and persecution, in consequence of their connection with Mr. Wesley, a known loyalist, and of the imprudence of some of the English preachers above mentioned; and also on account of their own consci¬ entious scruples in relation to the spirit and practice of war in general, and particularly in regard to the nature of the oaths required of them in some of the states, and which they refused to take. For a fuller account of those times and scenes, the reader may consult the Life oj GaiTeltson by Dr. Bangs, and a small volume entitled Cooper on Asbury, by the Rev. Ezekiel Cdbper.—American Edit.] 202 LIFE OF THE " A Calm Address to thr American Colonies but the copies which were shipped for America were laid hold of by a friend, who suppressed them; so that the work remained unknown in the colonies until a considerable time afterward. This was probably a fortunate incident for the infant cause. After the war had terminated, politi¬ cal views were of course laid aside, and Mr. Wesley made a provision for the government of his American societies, which will be subsequently adverted to. They became, of course, independent of British Methodism, but have most honourably preserved the doctrines, the general discipline, and, above all, the spirit of the body. Great, and even astonishing, has been their success in that new and rising country, to the wide-spread settlements of which their plan of itinerancy was admirably adapted. The Methodists are become, as to numbers, the leading religious body of the Union ; and their annual increase is very great. In the last year it was thirty-six thousand, making a total in their communion of one thousand nine hundred ministers, and four hundred and seventy-six thousand members, having, as stated in a recent statistical account published in the United Stales, upward of two millions, five hun¬ dred thousand of the population under their immediate influence. In the number of their ministers, members, and congregations, the Baptists nearly equal the Methodists; and these two bodies, both itinerant in their labours,* have left all the other religious denominations far behind. It is also satisfactory to remark, that the leading preachers and members of the Methodist Church in the United States appear to be looking forward with enlarged views, and with prudent regard, to the future, and to aim at the culti¬ vation of learning in conjunction with piety. Several colleges have been from time to time established; and recently a university, for the education of the youth of the [* As regards the Baptists, this is a mistake. In their numbers too, both of ministers and members, however respectable, they are, we think, much less nearly equal to those of the Methodist commu¬ nion than our excellent author seems to suppose. In making a correct statistical comparison of the number of ministers particularly, in the two communions, on the principle of enumeration which we believe our Baptist brethren adopt, all the localas well as the itinerant minis¬ ters of the Methodist Episcopal Church ought to be included; and then there is almost no comparison. We make not this note with any REV. JOHN WESLEY. 203 American Connection, has been founded.* The work in the United States has been distinguished by frequent and extraordinary revivals of religion, in which a signal effect has been produced upon the moral condition of large districts of country, and great numbers of people have been rapidly brought under a concern for their salvation. In the contemplation of results so vast, and in so few years, we may devoutly exclaim,What hath God wrought!" The mention of what are called revivals of religion in the United States may properly here lead us to notice, that, in Great Britain also, almost every Methodist society has at different times experienced some sudden and extra¬ ordinary increase of members, the result of what has been believed to be, and that not without good reason, a special effusion of divine influence upon the minds of men. Sometimes these effects have attended the preaching of eminently energetic preachers, but have often appeared where those stationed in the circuits have not been remarkably distinguished for energy or pathos. Some¬ times they have followed the continued and earnest prayers of the people; at others they have come suddenly and unlooked for. The effects however have been, that the piety of the societies has been greatly quickened, and rendered more deep and active, and that their number has increased; and of the real conversion of many who have thus been wrought upon, often very suddenly, the best evidence has been afforded. To sudden conversions, as such, great objections have been indeed taken. For these, however, there is but little reason; for if we believe the testimony of Scripture, that the Spirit is not only given to the disciples of Christ, after" they assume that character, but in order to their becoming such; that, according to view or disposition to disparage, in any respect, the numerous and respectable denomination to which it relates ; but simply for the sake of what we believe to be due in a faithful record of historical facts.— American Edit.] [* The Wesleyan University, recently established at Middletown, in the state of Connecticut, is by no means designed for the education of the youth of the Methodist Connection exclusively. It is founded on the general principles of other American colleges and universities, and for the education of youth generally. All classes, without sub¬ jection to any religious test, or any question in regard to their religious tenets, provided only their moral conduct be good, are admitted on the some terms, and to the enjoyment of equal privileges.—Am. Edit.] 204 LIFE OF THE the words of our Lord, this Spirit is sent "to convince the world of sin," to the end that they may believe in Christ; and that the Gospel, faithfully and fully proclaimed by the ministers of Christ, is " the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth," and is made so by the accom¬ panying influence of the Holy Ghost; who shall prescribe a mode to divine operation 1 Who, if he believes in such an influence accompanying the truth, shall presume to say that when that truth is proposed, the attention of the care¬ less shall be roused only by a gradual and slow process ?— that the heart shall not be brought into a state of right feeling as to eternal concerns, but by a reiteration of means which we think most adapted to produce that effect 1—that nq influence on the mind is genuine and divine, if it operates not in a prescribed manner"?—that the Holy Spirit shall not avail himself of the variety which exists in the mental constitutions of men, to effect his purposes of mercy by different methods ?—and that the operations of grace shall not present, as well as those of nature, that beauteous variety which so much illustrates the glory of Him " who Worketh all in all ?" And, farther, who shall say, that even the peculiarities of men's natures shall not, in some instances, be set aside in the course of a divine and secret operation, which touching the springs of action, and opening the sources of feeling, gives an intensity of energy to the one, and a flow to the other, more eminently indicative of the finger of God in a work which his own glory, and the^humility proper to man, require should be known and acknowledged as His work alone"? Assuredly there is nothing in the reason of the case to fix the manner of producing such effects to one rule, and nothing in Scripture. Instances^of sudden con¬ version occur in th^New Testament in sufficient number to warrant us to conclude, that this may be often the mode adopted by divine wisdom, and especially in a slumbering age, to arouse attention to long despised and neglected truths. The conversions at the day of pentecost were sudden, and, for any thing that appears to the contrary, they 'were real; for the persons so influenced were thought worthy to be "added to the church." Nor was it by the miracle of tongues that the effect was produced. If miracles could have converted them, they had witnessed REV. JOHN WESLEY. 205 greater than even that glorious day exhibited. The dead had been raised up in their sight, the earth had quaked beneath their feet, the sun had hid himself and made an untimely night, and Christ himself had arisen from a tomb sealed and watched. It was not by the impression of the miracle of tongues alone, but by that supervenient gracious influence which operated with the demonstrative sermon of Peter, after the miracle had excited the attention of his hearers, that they were " pricked in their hearts, and cried, Men and brethren, what shall we do ?" The only true rule of judging of professed conversion is its fruits. The modes of it may vary from circumstances of which we-are not the fit judges, and never shall be, until we know more of the mystic powers of mind, and of that intercourse which Almighty God, in his goodness, condescends to hold with it. It is granted, however, that in such cases a spurious feeling has been often mixed up with these genuine visit¬ ations ; that some ardent minds, when even sincere, have not sufficiently respected the rules of propriety in their acts of worship; that some religious deception has taken place ; that some persons have confounded susceptibility of feeling with depth of grace; that censoriousness and spiritual pride have displaced that humility and charity which must exist wherever the influence of the Spirit of God is really present; and that, in some cases, a real fanaticism has sprung up, as in the case of George Bell and his followers in London, at an early period of Methodism. But these are accidents,—tares sown in the field among the good seed, which were never spared by Mr. Wesley or his most judicious successors. In the early stages of their growth indeed, and before they assumed a decided character, they were careful lest, by plucking fchem up, they should root out the good seed also; but both in Great Britain and in America, no extravagance has ever been encouraged by the authorities of either society, and no im¬ portance is attached to any thing but the genuine fruits of conversion. In the early part of 1770, we find Mr. Wesley, as usual, prosecuting his indefatigable labours in different parts of the kingdom, and every where diffusing the influence of spirituality and zeal, and the light of a " sound doctrine." 18 206 LIFE OF THE His Journals present a picture of unwearied exertion, such as was perhaps never before exhibited, and in themselves they form ample volumes, of great interest, not only as a record of his astonishing and successful labours, but from their miscellaneous and almost uniformly instructive cha¬ racter. Now he is seen braving the storms and tempests in his journeys, fearless of the snows of winter, and the heats of summer; then, with a deep susceptibility of all that is beautiful and grand in nature, recording the plea¬ sures produced by a smiling landscape, or by mountain scenery:—Here turning aside to view some curious object of nature; there some splendid mansion of the great; show¬ ing at the same time in his pious and often elegant, though brief reflections, with what skill he made all things contri¬ bute to devotion and cheerfulness. Again, we trace him into his proper work, preaching in crowded chapels, or to multitudes collected in the most public resorts in towns, or in the most picturesque places of their vicinity. Now he is seen by the side of the sick and dying, and then, sur¬ rounded with his societies, uttering his pastoral advices. An interesting and instructive letter frequently occurs; then a jet of playful and good humoured wit upon his perse¬ cutors, or the stupidity of his casual hearers; occasionally, in spite of the philosophers, an apparition story is given as he heard it, and of which his readers are left to judge ; and often we meet with a grateful record of providential escapes, from the falls of his horses, or from the violence of mobs. Notices of books also appear, which are often exceedingly just and striking; always short and characteristic; and as he read much on his journeys, they are very frequent. A few of these notices, in his Journal of this year, taken without selection, may be given as a specimen :— " I read with all the attention I was master of, Mr. Hutchinson's Life, and Mr. Spearman's Index to his Works. And I was more convinced than ever, 1. That he had not the least conception, much less experience, of inward religion: 2. That an ingenious man may prove just what he pleases, by well-devised Scriptural etymolo¬ gies : especially if he be in the fashion, if he affect to read the Hebrew without vowels : and, 3. That his whole hypo¬ thesis, philosophical and theological, is unsupported by any solid proof. REV. JOHN WESEEV. 207 ' I sat down to read and seriously consider some of the writings of Baron Swedenborg. I began with huge preju¬ dice in his favour, knowing him to be a pious man, one of a strong understanding, of much learning, and one who thoroughly believed himself. But I could not hold out long. Any one of his visions puts his real character out of doubt. He is one of the most ingenious, lively, entertain¬ ing madmen, that ever set pen to paper. But his waking dreams -are so wild, so far remote both from Scripture and common sense, that one might as easily swallow the stories of Tom Thumb, or Jack the Giant-killer. " I met with an ingenious book, the late Lord Lyttle- ton's ' Dialogues of the Dead.' A great part of it I could heartily subscribe to, though not to every word. I believe Madam Guion was in several mistakes, speculative and practical too; yet I would no more dare to call her, than her friend Archbishop Fenelon, ' a distracted enthusiast.' She was undoubtedly a woman of a very uncommon under¬ standing, and of excellent piety. Nor was she any more ' a lunatic,' than she was a ' heretic.' " Another of this lively writer's assertions is, ' Martin has spawned a strange brood of fellows, called Methodists, Moravians, Hutchinsonians, who are madder than Jack was in his worst days.' I would ask any one who knows what good breeding means, Is this language for a noble¬ man or for a porter? But let the language be as it may, is the sentiment just? To say nothing of the Methodists, (although some of them too are not quite out of their senses,) could his lordship show rne in England many more sensible men than Mr. Gambold, and Mr. Okeley? And yet both of these were called Moravians. Or could he point out many men of stronger and deeper understanding than Dr. Home and Mr. William Jones? (if he could pardon them for believing the Trinity!) And yet both of these are Hutchinsonians. What pity is it that so ingenious a man, like many others gone before him, should pass so peremptory a sentence, in a cause which he does not under¬ stand ! Indeed, how could he understand it? How much has he read upon the question? What sensible Methodist, Moravian, or Hutchinsonian, did he ever calmly converse with ? What does he know of them, but from the carica¬ tures drawn by Bishop Lavington, or Bishop Warburton 1 208 LIFE OF THE And did he ever give himself the trouble of reading the answers to those warm, lively men ? Why should a good natured and a thinking man thus condemn whole bodies of men by the lump ? In this I can neither read the gen¬ tleman, the scholar, nor the Christian." " I set out for London; and read over in the way that celebrated book, ' Martin Luther's Comment on the Epis¬ tle to the Galatians.' I was utterly ashamed. How have I esteemed this book, only because I had heard it so com¬ mended by others! or, at best, because I had read some excellent sentences, occasionally quoted from it! But what shall J say, now I judge for myself? now I see with my own eyes ? Why, not only that the author makes nothing out, clears up not one considerable difficulty; that he is quite shallow in his remarks on many passages, and muddy and confused almost on all: but that he is deeply tinctured with Mysticism throughout, and hence often dangerously wrong. To instance only in one or two points. How does he (almost in the words of Tauler) decry reason, right or wrong, as an irreconcilable enemy to the Gospel of Christ! Whereas, what is reason (the faculty so called) but the power of apprehending, judging and discoursing?— which power is no more to be condemned in the gross, than seeing, hearing, or feeling. Again, how blasphemously does he speak of good works and of the law of God; constantly coupling the law with sin, death, hell, or the devil; and teaching, that Christ delivers us from them all alike. Whereas it can no more be proved by Scripture, that Christ delivers us from the law of God, than that he delivers us from holiness or from heaven. Here (I appre¬ hend) is the real spring of the grand error of the Mora¬ vians. They follow Luther, for better for worse. Hence their 'No works, no law, no commandment.' But who art thou that ' speakest evil of the law, and judgest the law V "I read over, and partly transcribed, Bishop Bull's 'Har- monia Apostolica.' The position with which he sets out is this, 'that all good works, and not faith alone, are the necessarily previous condition of justification,' or the for¬ giveness of our sins. But in the middle of the treatise he asserts, ' that faith alone is the condition of justification ' for faith,' says he, ' referred to justification, means all REV. JOHN WESLEY. 209 inward and outward good works.' In the latter end he affirms, 'that there are two justifications: and that only inward good works necessarily precede the former, but both inward and outward the latter.' " Mr. Wesley meant this brief but just analysis to be Bishop Bull's refutation, and it is sufficient. "Looking for a book in our college library, I took down, by mistake, the Works of Episcopius; which opening on an account of the Synod of Dort, I believed it might be useful to read it through. But what a scene is here disclosed! I wonder not at the heavy curse of God, which so soon after fell on the Church and nation. WThat a pity it is, that the holy Synod of Trent, and that of Dort, did not sit at the same time!—nearly allied as they were, not only as to the purity of doctrine, which each of them established, but also as to the spirit wherewith they acted;—if the latter did not exceed. "Being in the Bodleian library, I lit on Mr. Calvin's account of the case of Michael Servetus; several of whose letters he occasionally inserts: wherein Servetus often declares in terms, ' I believe the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God.' Mr. Calvin, however, paints him such a monster as never was, an Arian, a blasphemer, and what not; beside, strewing over him his flowers of dog, devil, swine, and so on, which are the usual appellations he gives to his opponents. But still he utterly denies his being the cause of Servetus's death. ' No,' says he : 'I only advised our magistrates, as having a right to,restrain heretics by the sword, to seize upon and try that arch-heretic. But after he was condemned, I said not one word about his execution!' " The above may be taken as instances of his laconic re¬ views of books. Mr. Wesley's defence of the power he exercised in the government of the Methodist societies may also here be given ; observing that it is easier, considering the circum-. stances in which he was placed, to carp at it, than to find a solid answer. Few men, it is true, have had so much power : but on the other hand he could not have retained it in a perfectly voluntary society, had he not used it mild¬ ly and wisely, and with a perfectly disinterested and public spirit. 18* 210 LIFE OF THE " What is that power 1 It is a power of admitting into and excluding from the societies under my care ; of choos¬ ing and removing stewards ; of receiving or not receiving helpers ; of appointing them when, where, and how to help me, and of desiring any of them to confer with me when I see good. And as it was merely in obedience to the providence of God, and for the good of the people, that I at first accepted this power, which I never sought; so it is on the same consideration, not for profit, honour, or pleasure, that I use it at this day. " 'But several gentlemen are offended at your having so much power.' I did not seek any part of it. But when it was come unawares, not daring to bury that talent, I used it to the best of my judgment. Yet I never was fond of it. I always did, and do now, bear it as my bur¬ den, the burden which God lays upon me; and therefore I dare not lay it down. " But if you can tell me any one, or any five men, to whom I may transfer this burden, who can and will do just what I do now, I will heartily thank both them and you." (Wesley's Works.) This year, 1770, is memorable in the history of Me¬ thodism, for having given birth to a long and very ardent controversy on the doctrines of Calvinism. It took its rise from the publication of the Minutes of the Confer¬ ence, in which it was determined, that, in some particulars then pointed out, the preachers had " leaned too much to Calvinism." This is easily explained. Mr. Whitefield, and Howell Harris, the early coadjutors of the Wesleys, became Calvinists ; but the affection which existed among this little band, was strong; and as they all agreed in preaching, what was at that time most needed, the doctrine of salvation by faith, " an agreement" was made at a very early period, between the Wesleys and Howell Harris, to forget all peculiarities of opinion as much as possible in their sermons, to use as far as they could, with a good con¬ science, the same phrases in expressing the points on which they substantially agreed, and to avoid controversy. Such an agreement shows the liberal feeling which existed among the parties; but it was not of a nature to be so rigidly kept as to give entire satisfaction. On these arti¬ cles of peace, we find therefore, endorsed, at a subsequent REV. JOHN WESLEY. 211 period, in the hand-writing of Mr. Charles Wesley, "Vain agreement." Mr. Wesley's anxiety to maintain unity of effort as well as affection with Mr. Whitefield, led him also, in 1743, to concede to his Calvinistic views, as far as possible ; and he appears not to have been- disposed to deny, though he says he could, not prove it, that some per¬ sons might be unconditionally elected to eternal glory; but not to the necessary exclusion of any other from salva¬ tion. And he was then " inclined to believe" that there is a state attainable in this life, " from which a man can¬ not finally fall." But he was subsequently convinced by the arguments of Mr. Thomas Walsh, that this was an error.* These considerations will account for the exist¬ ence of what Mr. Wesley called "a leaning to Calvinism," both in himself, and among some of the preachers, and rendered a review of the case necessary."f Though the leaders had approached so near " the very edge of Calvin¬ ism" on one side, and "of Antinomianism" also, with safety, it was not to be wondered at that others -should overstep the line. Beside, circumstances had greatly changed. A strong tide of Antinomianism had set in, and threatened great injury to practical godliness through¬ out the land. Dr. Southey attributes this to the natural tendency of Methodism; but here he shows himself only partially acquainted with the subject. The decline of reli- * Mr. Walsh was received by Mr. Wesley as a preacher, in 1750, and died in 1759. The following is Mr. Wesley's character of him:— " That blessed man sometimes preached in Irish, mostly in English; and wherever he preached, whether in English or Irish, the word was sharper than a two-edged sword. So that I do not remember ever to have known any preacher, who, in so few years as he remained upon earth, was an instrument of converting so many sinners from the error of their ways. By violent straining of his voice, he contracted a true pulmonary consumption, which carried him off. O what a man to he snatched away in the strength of his years ! Surely thy ' judgments are a great deep!' " He was so thoroughly acquainted with the Bible, that if he was questioned, concerning any Hebrew word in the Old, or any Greek word in the New Testament, he would tell, after a little pause, not only how often one or the other occurred in the Bible, but also what it meant in every place. Such a master of Biblical knowledge I never knew before, and never expect to see again." f Mr. Wesley's Sermon on Imputed Righteousness is an instance of his anxiety to approach his Calvinistic brethren, in his modes of expression, as far as possible; and in this attempt he sometimes laid himself open to be misunderstood on both sides. 212 Life of the gion among many of the Dissenting Chuiv-ies, had scat¬ tered the seeds of this heresy all around them, though not without calling forth a noble testimony against it from some of their ablest ministers; and when they began to feel the influence of the revival of piety in the last century, the tares sprung up with the plants of better quality. The Calvinism taught by Mr. Howell Harris, and Mr. White- field, was also perverted by many of their hearers to sanc¬ tion the same error. Several of the evangelical clergy, likewise, who had no immediate connection with Mr. Wesley, were Calvinists of the highest grade; and as their number increased, their incautious statements of the doctrines of grace and faith, carried beyond their own intentions, became more mischievous. To show, how¬ ever, that Antinomianism can graft itself upon other stocks beside that of the Calvinistic decrees, it was found also among many of the Moravians; and the Methodists did not escape. Wherever, indeed, the doctrine of justifica¬ tion by faith is preached, there is a danger, as St. Paul himself anticipated in his Epistle to the Romans, lest perverse, vain, and evil minds should pervert it to licen¬ tiousness ; heavenly as it is in authority, and pure in its influence, when rightly understood. In fact, there is no such exclusive connection between the more sober Calvinistic theories of predestination, and this great error, as some have supposed. It is too often met with, also, among those who hold the doctrine of general redemption; though it must be acknowledged, that for the most part, such persons,, at length, go over to predestinarian notions, as affording, at least, some collateral confirmation of the solifidian theory. That Calvinistic opinions, in their various forms, were at this time greatly revived and dif¬ fused, is certain. The religious excitement produced gave activity to theological inquiries; and speculative minds, especially those who had some taste for metaphysical dis¬ cussions, were soon entangled in questions of predestina¬ tion, prescience, necessity, and human freedom. The views of Calvin on these subjects were also held by many, who, connecting them with vital and saving truths, were honoured with great usefulness; and as the Wesleyan societies were often involved in these discussions, and in danger of having their faith unsettled, and their practical REV. JOHN WESLEY. 213 piety injured by those in whom Calvinism had begun to luxuriate into the ease and carelessness of Antinomian license, no subject at that period more urgently required attention. For this reason, Mr. "Wesley brought it before his conference of preachers. The withering effects of this delusion were also strongly pointed out in his sermons, and were afterward still more powerfully depicted by the master pencil of Mr. Fletcher, in those great works to which he now began to apply himself, in order to stem the torrent. Dr. Southey has fallen into the error of imagining that Mr. Fletcher's descriptions of the ravages of Antinomianism were drawn from its effects upon the Wesleyan societies ; but that mistake arose from his not adverting to the circumstance, that neither Mr. Wesley nor Mr. Fletcher confined their cares t6 these societies, but kept an equally watchful eye upon the state of reli¬ gion in the land at large, and consequently in the Church of which they were ministers. The societies under Mr. Wesley's charge were indeed at no time more than very partially affected by this form of error. Still, in some places they had suffered, and in all were exposed to dan¬ ger; and as Mr. Wesley regarded them, not only as a people given to him by God to preserve from error, but to engage to bear a zealous and steadfast testimony " against the evils of the time in every place he endeavoured to prepare them for their warfare, by instructing them fully in the questions at issue. The Minutes of 1770 contained, therefore, the following passages :— "We said, in 1744, ' We have leaned too much toward Calvinism.' Wherein 1 " 1. With regard to man's faithfulness. Our Lord him¬ self taught us to use the expression. And we ought never to be ashamed of it. We ought steadily to assert, on his authority, that if a man is not ' faithful in the unrighteous mammon,' God will not give ' him the true riches.' " 2. With regard to ' working for life.' This also our Lord has expressly commanded us. ' Labour,' literally, ' work for the meat that endureth to everlasting life.' And in fact, every believer, till he comes to glory, works for as well us from life. ' 3. We have received it as a maxim, that ' a man is to 214r LIFE OF THE do nothing in order to justification.' Nothing can be more false. Whoever desires to find favour with God should ' cease from evil, and learn to do well.' Whoever repents should do ' works meet for repentance.' And if this is not in order to find favour, what does he do them for? " Review the whole affair. " 1. Who of us is now accepted of God ? " He that now believes in Christ, with a loving and obedient heart. " 2. But who among those that never heard of Christ? 44 He that feareth God and worketh righteousness ac cording to the light he has. " 3. Is this the same with ' he that is sincere ?' " Nearly, if not quite. " 4. Is not this ' salvation by works ?' " Not by the merit of works, but by works as a condition. 44 6. What have we then been disputing about for these thirty years ? " I am afraid, about words. " 7. The grand objection to one of the preceding pro¬ positions is drawn from matter of fact. God does in fact justify those who, by their own confession, neither feared God nor wrought righteousness. Is this an exception to the general rule ? " It is a doubt, whether God makes any exception at all. But how are we sure, that the person in question never did fear God and work righteousness ? His own saying so is not proof: for we know how all that are convinced of sin undervalue themselves in every respect. " 8. Does not talking of a justified or a sanctified slate tend to mislead men ? almost naturally leading them to trust in what was done in one moment? Whereas we are every hour and every moment pleasing or displeasing to God, 4 according to our works;'—according to the whole of our inward tempers, and our outward behaviour." That these were passages calculated to awaken suspi¬ cion, and that they gave the appearance of inconsistency to Mr. Wesley's opinions, and indicated a tendency to run to one extreme, in order to avoid another,—an error which Mr. Wesley more generally avoided than most men, can not be denied. They, however, when fairly examined- expressed nothing but what is found in substance in the REV. JOHN WESLEY. 215 doctrinal conversations at the conferences from 1744 to 1747 ; but the sentiments were put in a stronger form, and were made to bear directly against the Antinomian opinions of the day. To " man's faithfulness" nothing surely could be reasonably objected ; it is enjoined upon believers in the whole Gospel, and might have been known by the objectors to have been always held by Mr. Wesley, but so as necessarily to imply a constant dependence upon the influence of the Holy Spirit. That the rewards of eternity are also to be distributed in higher or lower degrees according to the obedient works of believers, yet still on a principle of grace, is a doctrine held by divines of almost every class, and is confirmed by many passages of Scrip¬ ture. To the Antinomian notion, that a man is to do nothing in order to justification, Mr. Wesley opposes the same sentiment which he held in 1744, that previously to justification men must repent, and, if there be opportunity, do works meet for repentance; and when he asks, " if they do them not in order to justification, what do they do them fori"—these words are far enough from intimating that such works are meritorious, although they are capable of being misunderstood. Repentance is indeed a condition of justification, as well as faith, but indirectly and remotely,— " Repent ye, and believe the Gospeland seeing that Mr. Wesley, so expressly in the same page, shuts out the merit of works, no one could be justly offended with this statement (except as far as the phrase is concerned) who did not embrace some obvious form of practical error. The doctrine of the acceptance of such Heathens as "fear God and work righteousness," might be offensive to those who shut out all Heathens, as such, from the mercies of God,—a tenet, however, which is not necessarily connected with Calvinism; and it ought not to have been ob¬ jected to by others, unless Mr. Wesley had stated, as some of his opponents understood him to do, that " a Heathen might be saved without a Saviour." No such thought was ever entertained by him, as Mr. Fletcher observes in his defence; for he held that whenever a Heathen is accepted, it is merely through the merits of Christ, although it is in connection with his " fearing God, and working righteous¬ ness." " 'But how comes he to see that God is to,be feared, and that righteousness is his delight V Because a LIFE OF THE beam of our Sun of righteousness shines in his darkness. All is therefore of grace; the light, the works of righteous¬ ness done by that light, an# acceptance in consequence oi them." (Fletcher's [Works.) But when the Minutes went on to state that this shows thai salvation is by works as a " condition, though not by the merit of works," the highest point of heresy was supposed to be reached. Yet from this charge, though it derived some colour from a paradoxical mode of ex¬ pression not to be commended, Mr. Fletcher brings off his friend unhurt:— " Our Church expresses herself more fully on this head in the Homily on Salvation, to which the Article refers. ' St. Paul,' says she,' declares nothing [necessary] on the behalf of man concerning his justification, but only a true and lively faith, and yet (N. B.) that faith does not shut out repentance, hope, love, [of desire when we are coming, love of delight when we are come,] dread, and the fear of God, to be joined with it in every man that i? justified; but it shutteth them out from the office of justifying ; so that they be all present together in him that is justified, yet they justify not all together.' This is agreeable to St. Peter's doctrine, maintained by Mr. Wesley. Only faith in Christ for Christians, and faith in the light of their dispensation for Heathens, is necessary in order to accept¬ ance : But though faith only justifies, yet it is never alone; for repentance, hope, love of desire, and the fear of God, necessarily accompany this faith, if it be living. Our Church therefore is not at all against works proceeding from or accompanying, faith in all its stages. She grants, that whether faith seeks or finds its object, whether it longs for or embraces it, it is still a lively, active, and working grace. She is only against the vain conceit that works have any hand in meriting justification or purchas¬ ing salvation, which is what Mr. Wesley likewise strongly opposes. " If any still urge, ' I do not love the word condition;' I reply, it is no wonder; since thousands so hate the thing, that they even choose to go to hell, rather than perform it. But let an old worthy divine, approved by all but Crisp's disciples, tell you what we mean by condition: ' An antecedent condition (says Mr. Flavel in his ' Discourse REV. JOHN WESLEY. 217 of Errors') signifies no more than an act of ours, which, though it be neither perfect in any* degree, nor in the least meritorious of the benefit con&rrtecl, nor performed in our own natural strength, is yet, Jfflfeordmg to the constitution of the covenant, required of us, m cader to the blessings consequent thereupon, by virtue^ the promise; and consequently, benefits and mercies granted in this order are and must be suspended by the donor, till it be per¬ formed.' Such a condition we affirm faith to be, with all that faith, necessarily implies." (Fletcher's Works.) The greatest stone of stumbling was, however, the remarks on merit:—- " As to merit itself, of which we have been so dreadfully afraid: we are rewarded ' according to our works,' yea, ' because of our works.' - How does this differ from, ' for the sake of our works?' And how differs this from secundum mcrita operum, ' as our works deserve V Can you split this hair? I doubt I cannot." The outcry of " dreadful heresy" raised against him, particularly on this article, was the more uncandid, because by explaining the phrase secundum merila operum, to mean, as our works deserve, it was clear, especially taking the passage in connection with what he had previously stated, that he understood merit in that loose, and not perhaps always correct, sense in which it had often been used by several of the ancient fathers; and also that he was not speaking of our present justification, but of our final reward. But here Mr. Fletcher shall again be heard:— " If Mr. Wesley meant, that we are saved by the merit of works, and not entirely by that of Christ, you might exclaim against his proposition as erroneous ; and I would echo back your exclamation. But as he flatly denies it in those words, 'Not by the merit of works,' and has con¬ stantly asserted the contrary for above thirty years, we cannot, without monstrous injustice, fix that sense upon the word merit in this paragraph. " Divesting himself of bigotry and party spirit, he gene¬ rously acknowledges truth even when it is held forth by his adversaries: an instance of candour worthy of our imitation! He sees that God offers and gives his children, here on earth, particular rewards for particular instances 19 218 LIFE OF THE of obedience. He knows that when a man is saved me¬ ritoriously by Christ, and conditionally by (or if you please, upon the terms of) the work of faith, the patience of hope, and the labour of love, he shall particularly be rewarded in heaven for his works: and' he observes, that the Scriptures steadily maintain, we are recompensed according to our works, yea, because of our works. " The former of these assertions is plain from the para¬ ble of the talents, and from these words of our Lord, Matt, xvi, 27,' The Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father, and reward every man according to his works unbelievers according to the various degrees of demerit belonging to their evil works ; (for some of them shall comparatively 'bebeaten with few stripes ;') and believers according to the various degrees of excellence found in their good works; 'for as one star differeih from another star in glory, so also is the resurrection of the' righteous ' dead.' " If we detach from the word merit the idea of ' obliga¬ tion on God's part to bestow any thing upon creatures, who have a thousand times forfeited their comforts and exist¬ ence,'—if we take it in the sense we fix to it in a hundred cases ; for instance this : ' A master may reward his scho¬ lars according to the merit of their exercises, or he may not; for the merit of the best exercise can never bind him to bestow a premium for it, unless he has promised it of his own accord,'—if Ave take, I say, the word merit in this simple sense, it may be joined to the word good works, and bear an evangelical meaning. " To be convinced of it, candid reader, consider, with Mr. Wesley, that' God accepts and rewards no work but so far as it proceeds from his own grace through the Be¬ loved.' Forget not that Christ's Spirit is the savour of ^ach believer's salt, and that he puts excellence into the good works of his people, or else they could not be good. Remember, he is as much concerned in the good tempers, words, and actions of his living members, as a tree is con¬ cerned in the sap, leaves, and fruit of the branches it bears, John xv, 5. Consider, I say, all this, and tell us whether it can reflect dishonour upon Christ and his grace, to affirm, that as his personal merit—the merit of his holy life and painful death—' opens the kingdom of heaven to all be¬ lievers so the merit of those works which he enables his rev. john wesley. 219 members to do, will determine the peculiar degrees of glory graciously allotted to each of them." (Fletcher's Works.) Mr. Fletcher came forward to defend his venerable friend, on account of the great uproar which the Calvin- istic party had raised against him upon the publication of these Minutes. The countess of Huntingdon had taken serious alarm and offence; and the Rev. Walter Shirley, her brother and chaplain, had written a circular letter to all the serious clergy, and several others, inviting them to go in a body to the ensuing conference, and " insist upon a formal recantation of the said Minutes, and, in case of a refusal, to sign and publish their protest against them." Mr. Shirley and a few others accordingly attended the Bristol conference, where, says Mr. Wesley, " We had more preachers than usual in consequence of Mr. Shirley's circular letter. At ten on Thursday morning he came, with nine or ten of his friends : we conversed freely for about two hours ; and, I believe, they were satisfied, that we were not such ' dreadful heretics' as they imagined, but were tolerably sound in the faith.". The meeting was creditable to each party. Mr. Wes¬ ley acknowledged that the Minutes were " not sufficiently guarded." This must be felt by all; they were out of his usual manner of expressing himself, and he had said the same truths often in a clearer, and safer, and even stronger manner. He certainly did not mean to alter his previous opinions, or formally to adopt other terms in which to ex¬ press '.hem ; and therefore to employ new modes of speak¬ ing. though for a temporary purpose, was not without danger, although they were capable of an innocent expla¬ nation. Even Mr. Fletcher confesses that the Minutes wore " a new aspectand that at first they appeared to him " unguarded, if not erroneous." Mr. Wesley showed his candour in admitting the former; and to prevent all future misconstruction, he and the conference issued the following " Declaration," to which was appended a note from Mr. Shirley, acknowledging his mistake as to the meaning of the Minutes :— "Bristol, August 9, 1771. " Whereas the doctrinal points in the Minutes of a conference held in London, August 7, 1770, have been understood to favour 'justification by works:' now the 220 life of the Rev. John Wesley and others, assembled in conference, do declare that we had no such meaning; and that we abhor the doctrine of 'justification by works,' as a most perilous and abominable doctrine. And as the said Minutes are not sufficiently guarded in the way they are expressed, we hereby solemnly declare, in the sight of God, that we have no trust or confidence but in the alone merits of our Lord .and Saviour Jesus Christ for justification*or salva¬ tion, either in life, death, or the day of judgment. And though no one is a real Christian believer (and conse¬ quently cannot be saved) who doeth not good works, where there is time and opportunity ; yet our works have no part in meriting or purchasing our justification, from first to last, either in whole or in part. " Signed by the Rev. Mr. Wesley and fifty-three preachers." mr. shirley's note. " Mr. Shirley's Christian respects wait on Mr. Wesley. The declaration agreed to in conference the 8th of Au¬ gust, 1771, has convinced Mr. Shirley he had mistaken the meaning of the doctrinal points in the Minutes of the conference held in London, August 7, 1770 ; and he here¬ by wishes to testify the full satisfaction he has in the said declaration, and his hearty concurrence and agreement with the same. "Mr. Wesley is at full liberty to make what use he pleases of this.—August 10, 1771."* * This affair is capable" of more illustration than it has received from Mr. Wesley's biographers hitherto. Mr. Shirley's circular let¬ ter was naturally resented by Mr. Wesley, as being published before any explanations respecting the Minutes had been asked from him their author; and also from its assuming that Mr. S., and the clergy Who might obey his summons, had the right to come into the confer¬ ence, and to demand a recantation. Mr. Shirley, therefore, soon found, that he must approach in a more brotherly - manner, or that Mr. Wesley and the conference would have no intercourse with him. This led Lady Huntingdon and Mr. Shirley to address explanatory letters to Mr. Wesley. " As the method 'of proceeding, as well as the terms in which we had delivered ourselves," says Mr. Shirley, "was objected to by many as by no means proper, and in submission to the precept, 'Give no offence to Jew or Gentile, or to the church of God,' Lady Huntingdon and I wrote the following letters, which were deli¬ vered to Mr. Wesley the evening before the conference met." Lady Huntingdon says, " As you and your friends, and many others, have objected to the mode of the application to you in conference, as an REV. JOHN WESLEY. 221 Mr. Fletcher had entitled his Defence of Mr. Wesley " The First Check to Antinomianism but he did not arbitrary way of proceeding, we wish to retract what a more delibe¬ rate consideration might have prevented," &c. Mr. Shirley's letter acknowledges " that the circular was too hastily drawn up, and im¬ properly expressed; and therefore, for the offensive expressions in it we dgsire may be hereby understood to make eyery suitable sub¬ mission t<#you." On this explanation, Mr. Shirley and his ^friends were invited by Mr. Wesley to come to the conference on the third day of its sitting. Mr. Shirley's published narrative thus proceeds,— " To say the truth, I was pleased that the invitation came from Mr. Wesley, without any application made on our parts, that there might not be left the least room for censuring our proceedings as violent. On that day therefore, I went thither, accompanied with the Rev. Mr. Glascot, the Rev. Mr. Owen, (two ministers officiating in Lady Huntingdon's chapels,) John Lloyd, Esq., of Bath ; Mr. James Ire¬ land, merchant of Bristol; Mr. Winter, and two students belonging to Lady Huntingdon's college. " I shall only give you a brief detail of what passed, and rather the substance of what was spoken,-than the exact words ; omitting like¬ wise many things of no great weight or consequence. "After Mr. Wesley had prayed, I desired to know whether Lady Huntingdon's letter and mine to Mr. Wesley had been read to the conference. Being answered in the negative, I begged leave to read the copies of them; which was granted. I then said that I hoped the submission made was satisfactory to the gentlemen of the conference. This was admitted; but then it was urged, that as the offence given by the circular letter had been very public, so ought the letter of sub¬ mission. I therefore readily consented to the publication of it, and have now fulfilled my promise. Mr. Wesley then stood up; the pur¬ port of his speech was a sketch of his ministry from his first setting out to the present time ; with a view (as I understood) to prove that he had ever maintained justification by faith, and that there was nothing in the Minutes contrary thereunto. He complained of- ill treatment from many persons, that he apprehended had been under obligations to him ; and said that the present opposition was not to the Minutes, but to himself personally.—In answer I assured them in the most solemn manner, that, with respect to myself, my opposition was not to Mr. Wesley, or any particular person, but to the doctrines themselves.—And they were pleased thus far to give me credit.—I then proceeded to speak to the point; informed them of the great and gene¬ ral offence the Minuteslhad given ; that I had numerous protests and •testimonies against thepti sent me from Scotland, and from various parts of these kingdoms; that it must seem very extraordinary indeed, if so many men of sense and learning should be mistaken, and that there was nothing really offensive in the plain natural import of the Minutes ; that I believed they themselves (whatever meaning they might have intended) would allow that the more obvious meaning was reprehensible; and, therefore, I recommend to them, nay I begged and intreated for the Lord's sake, that they would go as far as they could with a good conscience, in giving the world satisfaction. I said I hoped they would not take offence, (for I did not mean, to give it,) as 222 LIFE OF THE content himself with evangelizing the apparently legal Minutes, and defending the doctrinal consistency and or¬ thodoxy of Mr. Wesley. He incidentally discussed various my proposing to them a declaration which I had drawn up, wishing that something at least analogous to it might be agreed to. f,.'then took the liberty to read it; and Mr. Wesley, after he had made some (not very material) alterations in it, readily consented to sign it; in which he was followed by fifty-three of the preachers in'connection with him; there being only one or two that were against it. "Thus was this important matter settled.. But one of the preachers (namely, Mr. Thomas Olivers) kept us a long time in debate; stren¬ uously opposed the declaration; and to the last would not consent to sign it. He maintained that our second justification (that is, at the day of judgment) is by works ; and he saw very clearly that for one that holds that tenet solemnly ' to declare in the sight of God that he has no trust or confidence but in the alone merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, for justification or salvation, either in life, death, or the day of judgment,' would be acting neither a consistent nor an upright part; for all the subtilties of metaphysical distinction can never reconcile tenets so diametrically opposite as these. But, blessed be God, Mr. Wesley, and fifty-three of his preachers, do not agree with Mr. Olivers in this material article; for it appears from their subscribing the declaration, that they do not maintain a second justi¬ fication by works. " After the declaration had been agreed to, it was required of me, on my part, that I would make some public acknowledgment that I had mistaken the meaning of the Minutes. Here I hesitated a little; for though I was desirous to do every thing (consistently with truth and a good conscience) for the establishment of peace and Christian fellowship ; yet I was very unwilling to give any thing under my hand that might seem to countenance the Minutes in their obvious sense. But then, when I was asked by one of the preachers whether I did not believe Mr. Wesley to be an honest man; I was distressed on the other hand, lest, by refusing what was desired, I should seem to infer a doubt to Mr. Wesley's disadvantage. Having confidence, therefore, in Mr. Wesley's integrity, who had declared he had no such meaning in the Minutes, as was favourable to justification by works ; and considering that every man is the best judge of his own meaning, and has a right, so far, to our credit, and that, though nothing else could, yet the declaration did convince me, they had- some other meaning than what appeared;—I say, (these things considered,) I promised them satisfaction in this particular; and,' a few days after¬ ward, sent Mr. Wesley the following message, with which he was very well pleased :— [Then follows Mr. Shirley's note as given above.] " Thus far all was well.—The foundation was secured.—And, with respect to lesser matters of difference, we might well bear with one another; and if either party should see occasion to oppose the other's pecidiar opinion, it might be done without vehemence, and without using any reproachful terms. The whole was conducted with great decency on all sides. We concluded with prayer, and with the warmest indications of mutual peace, and love. For my own part, REV. JOHN WESLEY. 223 other points of the quinquarticular controversy; and he, as well as Mr. Wesle/5 was quickly assailed by a number of replies not couched in the most courteous style. Mr. Fletcher's skill and admirable temper so fully fitted him to conduct the dispute which had arisen, that .Mr. Wesley left the contest chiefly to him, and calmly pursued his labours ; and the whole issued in a series of publications, from the pen of the vicar of Madeley, which, as a whole, can scarce¬ ly be too highly praised or valued.* While the language endures, they will effectually operate as checks to Antino- mianism in every subtle form which it may assume; and present the pure and beautiful system of evangelical truth, as well guarded on the other hand against Pelagian self- sufficiency. The Rev. Augustus Toplady, Mr. (afterward Sir Richard) Hill, and his brother, the Rev. Rowland Hill, with the Rev. John Berridge, were his principal antago¬ nists ; but his learning, his acuteness, his brilliant talent at illustrating an argument, and above all, the hallowed spirit in which he conducted the controversy, gave him a mighty superiority over his opponents ; and although there will be a difference of opinion, according to the systems which different readers have adopted, as to the side on which the victory of argument remains; there can be none as t< which bore away the prize of temper. Amidst the scur rilities and vulgar abuse of Mr. Toplady, otherwise an able writer, and a man of learning, and the coarse virulence or buffoonery of the Hills and Berridge,| it is refreshing to believe me, I was perfectly sincere; and thought this one of the hap¬ piest, and most honourable days of my life." The whole conduct of Mr. Shirley, in this affair, affords a pleasing contrast to that of the Hills, Toplady, and others, who soon rushed hot and reckless into the controversy. Mr. Shirley, it is true, com¬ plains, that after this adjustment, Mr. Fletcher should have so severely attacked him in his five'letters; but he appears never to have departed from the meekness of a Christian and the manners of a gentleman. * It ought to be observed, that Mr. Fletcher's writings are not to be considered, in every particular, as expressing the views of Mr. Wesley, and the body of Methodists j and that, though greatly admired among us, they are r ot reckoned among the standards of our doctrines. f The titles of several of the pieces, written by Toplady and others, such as " An old Fox tarred and feathered" The Serpent and the Fox" Pope John," &c ; are sufficient evidences of the temper and manners of this band of controversialists. In what the Rev. Rowland Hill calls " Same Gentle Strictures" on a sermon by Mr. Wesley, 224 life of the remark, in the writings of 44 the saintly Fletcher," so fine a union _of strength and meekness ; an edge so keen, and yet so smooth; and a heart kept in such perfect charity with his assailants, and so intent upon establishing truth, not for victory, but for salvation. In this dispute Mr. Wesley wrote but little, and that chiefly in defence of his own consistency, in reply to Mr. Hill. His pamphlets also are models of temper, logical and calm, but occasionally powerfully reproving; not so much as feeling that he had received abuse and insult, as holding it his duty to bring the aggressor to a due sense of his own misdoings. The conclusion of his first reply to Mr. Hill is a strong illustration :— 44 Having now answered the queries you proposed, suffer mc, sir, to propose one to you; the same which a gentleman of your own opinion proposed to me some years since - 4 Sir, how is it that as soon as a man comes to the know¬ ledge of the truth, it spoils his temper V That it does so I had observed over and over, as well as Mr. J. had. But how can we account for it? Has the truth (so Mr. J. termed what many love to term the doctrine of free grace) a natural tendency to spoil the temper? To inspire pride, haughtiness, superciliousness ? To make a man 4 wiser in his own eyes than seven men that can render a reason?' Does it naturally turn a man into a cynic, a bear, a Top- lady? Does it at once set him free from all the restraints preacned on laying the foundation stone of the City Road Chapel, Mr. Wesley is subjected to' certain not very gentle objurgations, which it would be too sickening a task to copy or to read. The Gos¬ pel Magazine, so called, was equally unmeasured in its abuse, and as vulgar ; but to do justice to all parties, the Calvinists even of that day disapproved of this publication, and it was given up. Even Mr. Rowland Hill appears to have incurred the displeasure of some of his brethren; for in a second edition of his 44 Gentle Strictures," he explains himself,—awkwardly enough, certainly,—that when he called Mr. Wesley "wretch," and 44miscreant," they must remember that44 wretch" means "an unhappy person and 44miscreant," "one whose belief is wrong!" We have happily no recent instances of equally unbrotherly and unchristian temper in connection with this controversy, except in the bitter and unsanctified spirit ofBogue and Bennett's History of the Dissenters. The two doctors, however, were in the habit of declining the merit of the passages on Methodism, in favour cf each other; and to which of. them the honour of their authorship is due, has never yet, I believe, been ascertained.— 44 Where there is shame," says Dr. Johnson, 44 there may in time be virtue.". p.ev. john wesley. 225 of good nature, decency, and good manners'? Cannot a man hold distinguishing grace, as it is called, but he must distinguish himself for passion, sourness, bitterness ? Must a man, as soon as he looks upon himself to be an absolute favourite of Heaven, look upon all that oppose him as Dia- bolonians, as predestinated dogs of hell ? Truly, the melan¬ choly instance now before us would almost induce us to think so. For who was of a more amiable temper than Mr. Hill, a few years ago ? When I first conversed with him in London, I thought I had seldom seen a man of for¬ tune who appeared to be of a more humble, modest, gentle, friendly disposition. And yet this same Mr. H., when he has once been grounded in the knowledge of the truth. is of a temper as totally different from this, as light is from darkness! He is now haughty, supercilious, disdaining his opponents, as unworthy to be set with the dogs of his flock! He is violent, impetuous, bitter of spirit! in a word, the author of the Review! " 0 sir, what a commendation is this of your doctrine ? Look at Mr. Hill the Arminian! The loving, amiable, generous, friendly man. Look at Mr. Hill the Calvinist! Is it the same person1? this spiteful, morose, touchy man? Alas, what has the knowledge of the truth done 1 What a deplorable change has it made ? Sir, I love you still; though I cannot esteem you, as I did once. Let me en¬ treat you, if not for the honour of God, yet for the honour of your cause, avoid, for the time to come, all anger, all spite, all sourness and bitterness, all contemptuous usage of your opponents, not inferior to you, unless in fortune. O put on again bowels of mercies, kindness, gentleness, long-suffering; endeavouring to hold, even with them that differ from you in opinion, the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace!" This controversy, painful as it was in many respects, and the cause of much unhallowed joy to the profane wits of the day, who were not a little gratified at this exhibition of what they termed " spiritual gladiatorship," has been productive of important consequences in this country. It showed to the pious and moderate Calvinists how well the richest views of evangelical truth could be united with Ar- minianism ; and it effected, by its bold and fearless exhi¬ bition of the logical consequences of the doctrines of the 226 LIFE OF THE decrees, much greater moderation in those who still admit¬ ted them, and gave birth to some softened modifications of Calvinism in the age that followed :—an effect which has remained to this day. The disputes on these subjects have, since that time, been less frequent, and more tem¬ perate ; nor have good men so much laboured to depart to the greatest distance from each other, as to find a ground on which they could make the nearest approaches. This has been especially the case between the- Methodists and the evangelical Dissenters. Of late a Calvinism of a higher and sterner form has sprung up among a certain sect of the clergy of the Church of England; though some of them, whatever their private theory may be, feel that these points are not fit subjects for the edification of their con¬ gregations in public discourses. Of Calvinism since the period of this controversy the Methodist preachers and societies have been in no danger; so powerful and com¬ plete was its effect upon them. At no conference, since that of 1770, has it been necessary again to ask, 44 Wherein have we leaned too much to Calvinism?" There has been indeed, not in the body, but in some of its ministers occa¬ sionally, a leaning to what is worse than Calvinism,—to a sapless, legal, and philosophizing theology. The influence of the opinions of the majority of the preachers has always, however, counteracted this ; and the true balance between the extremes of each system, as set up in the doctrinal writings of Mr. Wesley, has been of-late years better pre¬ served than formerly. Those writings are, indeed, more read and better appreciated in the Connection, than at some former periods ; and perhaps at the present time they exert a more powerful influence than they ever did over the theological views of both preachers and people. To this the admirably complete, correct, and elegant edition of Mr. Wesley's Works, lately put forth by the labour and judgment of the Rev. Thomas Jackson, will still farther contribute. Numerous valuable pieces on different sub¬ jects, which had been quite lost to the public, have been recovered; and others, but very partially known, have been collected.* [* An American stereotype edition of this Complete and Standard Edition of Mr. Wesley's Works, carefully revised, will be issued from the Methodist Episcopal Press in November next. It will be hand- REV. JOHN WESLEY. 227 In the midst of all these controversies and cares, the societies continued to spread and flourish under the influ¬ ence of the zeal and piety of the preachers, animated by the ceaseless activity and regular visits of Mr. Wesley, who, though now upward of seventy years of age, seemed to possess his natural strength unabated.* His thoughts were, however, frequently turning with anxiety to some arrangement for the government of the Connection after his death; and not being satisfied that the plan he had sketched out a few ye.ars before would provide for a case of so much consequence, he directed his attention to Mr. Fletcher, and warmly invited him to come forth into the work, and to allow himself to be introduced by him to the societies and preachers as their future head. Earnestly as this was pressed, Mr. Fletcher could not be induced to undertake a task to which, in his humility, he thought him¬ self inadequate. This seems to have been his only objec¬ tion ; but had he accepted the offer, the plan would have failed, as Mr. Fletcher was a few years afterward called into another world. From Mr. Charles Wesley, who had become a family man, and had nearly given up travelling, he had no hope as'a successor; and even then a farther settlement would have been necessary, because he could not be expected long to survive his brother. Still there¬ fore this important matter remained undetermined. At the time the overture was made to Mr. Fletcher, the preachers who were fully engaged in the work amounted to one hun¬ dred and fifty ; and the societies, in Great Britain and Ire¬ land, to upward of thirty-five thousand, exclusive of the regular hearers. This rapid and constant enlargement of somely cxecuteu on cnree qualities oi* paper, and will be farther improved by numerous translations, notes peculiarly adapted to America, and an original preface.—American Edit.] * In his seventy-second year he thus speaks of himself, " This oeing my birth day, the first day of my seventy-second year, I was considering, How is this that I find just the same strength as I did thirty years ago ? that my sight is considerably better now, and my nerves firmer, than they were then 1 that I have none of the infirmi¬ ties of old age, and have lost several I had in my youth ? The grand cause is the good pleasure of God, who doeth whatsoever pleaseth him. The chief means are, 1. My constantly rising at four for about fifty years: 2. My generally preaching at five in the morning, one of the most healthy exercises in the world: 3. My never travelling less, by sea or land, than four thousand five hundred miles in a year." 228 life of the the Connection heightened the urgency of the question of its future settlement; and it is pleasing to remark, that Mr. Charles Wesley at length entered into this feeling, and offered his suggestions. In spite of the little misunder¬ standings which had arisen, he maintained a strong interest in a work, of which he had been so eminent an instrument; and this grew upon him in his latter years. Thus we have seen him springing into activity upon the sickness of his brother, before mentioned, and performing for him the full " work of an evangelist," by travelling in his place ; and, upon Mr. Wesley's recovery, his labours were, afforded locally to the chapels in London and Bristol, to the great edification of the congregations. In one of his latest let¬ ters to his brother, entering into the question of a provision for the settlement of the future government of the Con¬ nection, he says, "I served West-street chapel on Friday and Sunday. Stand to your own proposal: ' Let us agree to differ.' I leave America and Scotland to your latest thoughts and recognitions ; only observing now, that you are exactly right,—Keep your authority while you live; and, after your death, detur digniori, [let it be given to the worthiest individual,] or rather, dignioribus, [to the worthiest individuals.] You cannot settle the succession. You cannot divine how God will settle it." Thus Charles gave up as hopeless the return to the Church, and suggested the plan which his brother adopted, to devolve the government, not indeed upon one, but upon many whom he esteemed "the worthiest," for age, expe¬ rience, talent, and moderation. CHAPTER XII. In 1775, Mr. Wesley, during a tour in the north of Ireland, had a dangerous sickness occasioned by sleeping on the ground, in an orchard, in the hot weather, which he says he had been "accustomed to do for forty years without ever being injured by it." He was slow to admit that old age had arrived, or he trusted to triumph long over its infirmities. The consequence in this case, however, was that, after manfully struggling with the incipient symptoms of the complaint, and attempting to throw them off by reading, journeying, and preaching, he sunk into a severe REV. JOHN WESLEY. 229 fever, from which, after lying insensible for some days, he recovered with extraordinary rapidity ; and resumed a service which, extended as it had been through so many years, was not yet to be terminated. Whilst in London the next year, the following incident occurred :— An order had been made by the house of lords, " That the commissioners of his majesty's excise do write cir¬ cular letters to all persons whom they have reason to suspect to have plate, as also to those who have not paid regularly the duty on the same," &c. In consequence of this order, the accountant-general for household plate sent Mr. Wesley a copy of the order, with the following letter :— "Reverend Sir,—As the commissioners cannot doubt but you have plate for which you have hitherto neglected to make an entry, they have directed me to send you the above copy of the lord's order, and to inform you, they ex¬ pect that you forthwith make due entry of all your plate, such entry to bear date from the commencement of the plate duty, or from such time as you have owned, used, had, or kept any quantity of silver plate, chargeable by the act of parliament; as in default hereof, the board will be obliged to signify your refusal to their lordships. "N. B. An immediate answer is desired." Mr. Wesley replied as follows :— "Sir,—I have two silver tea-spoons at London, and two at Bristol. This is all the plate which I have at present; and I shall not buy any more while so many around me want bread. I am, sir, your most humble servant, "John Wesley." No doubt the commissioners of his majesty's excise thought that the head of so numerous a people had not forgotten his own interests, and that the interior of his Episcopalresidence in London was not without superflui¬ ties and splendour. The bishop of Sodor and Man having written a pastoral letter to all the clergy within his diocess, to warn their flocks against Methodism, and exhorting them to present all who attended its meetings in the spiritual courts, and to repel every Methodist preacher from the sacrament, Mr. Wesley hastened to the island, and in May, 1777, landed at Douglas. In every place he appears to have been cor- 20 230 LIFE OF THE dially received by all ranks; and his prompt visit probably put a stop to this threatened ecclesiastical violence, for no farther mention is made of it. The societies in the island continued to flourish ; and, on Mr. Wesley's second visit, he found a new bishop of a more liberal character. The Foundery having become too small for the comfort¬ able accommodation of the congregation in that part ot London, and being also gloomy and dilapidated, a new chapel had been erected. "November 1st," says Mr. Wesley, "was the day appointed for opening the new chapel in the City Road. It is perfectly neat, but not fine and contains far more than theFoundery; I believe, together with the morning chapel, as many as the Tabernacle. Many were afraid that the multitudes, crowding from all parts, would have occasioned much disturbance ; but they were happily disappointed ; there was none at all: all was quiet¬ ness, decency, and order. I preached on part of Solo¬ mon's prayer at the dedication of the temple ; and both in the morning and afternoon God was eminently present in the midst of the congregation." (Journal.) Here the brothers agreed to officiate as often as possi¬ ble till the congregation should be settled. Two resident clergymen were also employed at this chapel as curates, for reading the full Church service, administering the sacraments, and burying the dead. But Mr. Charles Wes¬ ley took some little offence at the liberty given to the preachers to officiate in his brother's absence, and when he himself could not supply. His letter of complaint pro¬ duced, however, no change in his brother's appointments, nor was it likely. Mr. Wesley knew well that his own preaching at the new chapel, and the ministrations of the other clergymen, during the hours of service in the parish church, without a license from the bishop, or the acknow¬ ledgment of his spiritual jurisdiction, was just as irregular an affair, considered ecclesiastically, as the other. The City Road chapel, with its establishment of clergy, service in canonical hours, and sacraments, was in the eye of the law, as much as any Dissenting place of worship in London, a conventicle; though, when tried by a better rule, it was eminently, in those days of power and simplicity, "none other than the house of God, and the gate of heaven," to devout worshippers. An influence of a very extraordinary REV. JOHN WESLEY. 231 kind often rested upon the vast congregations assembled there; thousands were trained up in it for the kingdom of God; and the society exhibited a greater number of mem¬ bers, perhaps, than any other, except that in Bristol, who, for intelligence, deep experience in the things of God, sta¬ bility, meekness of spirit, and holiness of life, were at once the ornaments of Methodism, and an influential example to the other societies of the metropolis. In 1778, Mr. Wesley began to publish a periodical work, which he entitled, " The Arminian Magazine ; consisting of Extracts and Original Treatises on Universal Redemp¬ tion." He needed a medium through which he could reply to the numerous attacks made upon him; and he made use of it farther to introduce into general circulation several choice treatises on Universal Redemption, and to publish selections from his valuable correspondence with pious persons. He conducted this work while he lived; and it is still continued by the conference, under the title of the " Wesleyan Methodist Magazine," on the same general principles as to its theology, though on a more enlarged plan. A dispute of a somewhat serious aspect arose in the fol¬ lowing year out of the appointment of a clergyman by Mr* Wesley to preach every Sunday evening in the chapel at Bath. It was nbt probable that the preachers of the circuit should pay the same deference to a strange clergyman, recently introduced, as to Mr. Wesley ; but when this ex¬ clusive occupation of the pulpit on Sunday evenings was objected to by them and part of the society, Mr. Wesley, supported by his brother, who had accompanied him to Bath, stood firmly upon his right to appoint when and tt'here the preachers should officiate, as a fundamental part of the compact between them ; and the assistant preacher, Mr. M'Nab, was suspended until "he came to another mind." As Mr. M'Nab who had thus fallen under Mr. Wesley's displeasure was supported by many of the other preachers, a stormy conference was anticipated. To this meeting Mr. Wesley, therefore, foreseeing that his autho¬ rity would be put to the trial, strongly invited his brother, in order that he might assist him with his advice. At first Mr. Charles Wesley declined, on the ground that he could not trust to his brother's vigour and resolution. He, how- 232 LIFE OF THE ever, attended, but when he saw that Mr. Wesley was determined to heal the breach by concession, he kept entire silence. The offending preacher was received back with¬ out censure; and, from this time, Dr. Whitehead thinks that Mr. Wesley's authority in the conference declined. This is not correct; but that authority was exercised in a differ¬ ent manner. Many of the preachers had become old in the work ; and were men of great talents, tried fidelity, and influence with the societies. These qualities were duly appreciated by Mr. Wesley, who now regarded them more than formerly, when they were young and inexperienced, as his counsellors and coadjutors. It was an eminent proof of Mr. Wesley's practical wisdpm, that he never attempted to contend with circumstances not to be con¬ trolled ; and from this time he placed his supremacy no longer upon authority, but upon the influence of wisdom, character, and age, and thus confirmed rather than dimi¬ nished it. Had Mr. Charles Wesley felt sure of being supported by his brother with what he called " vigour," it is plain from his letter on the occasion, that he would have stood upon the alternative of the unconditional submission of all the preachers, or a separation. His brother chose a more excellent way, and no doubt foresaw, not only that if a separation had been driven on by violence, it would have been an extensive one ; but that amOng the societies which remained the same process would naturally, and necessarily, at some future time'take place, and so nothing be ultimately gained, to counterbalance* the immediate mischief. The silence maintained by Mr. Charles Wesley in this conference did him also great honour. He suspected " the warmth of his temperhe saw that, as his brother was bent upon conciliation, any thing he could say would only endanger the mutual confidence between him and his preachers, and he held his peace. He himself believed that a formal separation of the body of preachers and people from the Church would inevitably take place after his brother's death, and thought it best to bring on the crisis before that event. " You," says he to his brother, "think otherwise, and I submit." The fact has been, that no such separation as he feared, that is, separation on such princi¬ ples, and under such feelings of hostility to the Established Church, has yet taken place. ret. john wesley. 233 The following letter written by Mr. Wesley in 1782, to a nobleman high in office, shows how much his mind was alive to every thing which concerned the morals and reli¬ gion of the country, and is an instance of the happy man¬ ner in which he could unite courtesy with reproof without destroying its point. A report prevailed that the ministiy designed to embody the militia, and exercise them on a Sunday. " My Lord,—If I wrong your lordship I am sorry for it; but I really believe your lordship fears God; and I hope your lordship has no unfavourable opinion of the Christian revelation. This encourages me to trouble your lordship with a few lines, which otherwise I should not take upon me to do. " Above thirty years ago, a motion was made in parlia¬ ment, for raising and embodying the militia, and for exer¬ cising them, to save time, on Sunday. When the motion was like to pass, an old gentleman stood up and said, 'Mr. Speaker, I have one objection to this : I believe an old book, called the Bible.' The members looked at one another, and the motion was dropped. " Must not all others, who believe the Bible, have the very same objection 1 And from what I have seen, I can- riot but think, these are still three-fourths of the nation. Now, setting religion out of the question, is it expedient to give such a shock to so many millions of people at once ? And certainly it would shock them extremely: it would wound them in a very tender part. For would not they, would not all England, would not all Europe, consider this as a virtual repeal of the Bible 1 And would not all serious persons say, 'We have little religion in the land now ; but by this step we shall have less still. Forwhere- ever this pretty show is to be seen, the people will flock together; and will lounge away so much time before and after it, that the churches will be emptier than they are already!' "My lord, I am concerned for this on a double account. First, because I have personal obligations to your lordship, and would fain, even for this reason, recommend your lordship to the love and esteem of all over whom I have any influence. Secondly, because I now reverence your lordship for your office' sake; and believe it to be my 20* 234 life of the bounden duty to do all that is in my little power, to advance your lordship's influence and reputation. " Will your lordship permit me to add a word in my old fashioned way 1 1 pray Him that has all power in heaven and earth, to prosper all your endeavours for the public good, and am, my lord, your lordship's willing servant, " John Wesley." In 1783 Mr. Wesley paid a visit to Holland, having been pressed to undertake this journey by a Mr. Fergu¬ son, formerly a member of the London society, who had made acquaintance with some pious people, who, having read Mr. Wesley's Sermons, were desirous of seeing hinu The following are extracts from his Journal ; and they will be read with pleasure, both as exhibiting his activity at so advanced an age, and as they present an interesting picture of his intercourse with a pious remnant in several parts of that morally deteriorated country:— "Wednesday, June 11.—I took coach with Mr. Bracken- bury, Bvoadbent, and Whitfield; and in the evening we reached Harwich. I went immediately to Dr. Jones, who received me in the most affectionate manner : about nine in the morning we sailed ; and at nine on Friday 13, land¬ ed at Helvoetsluys. Here we hired a coach for Briel; but were forced to hire a waggon also, to carry a box, which one of us could have carried on his shoulders. At Briel we took a boat to Rotterdam. We had not been long there, when Mr. Bennet, a bookseller, who had invited me to his house, called for me. But as Mr. Loyal, the minister oi the Scotch congregation, had invited me, he gave up his claim, and went with us to Mr. Loyal's. I found a friendly sensible, hospitable, and I am persuaded, a pious man. " Saturday 14.—I had much conversation with the two English ministers, sensible, well-bred, serious men. These, as well as Mr. Loyal, were very willing I should preach in their churches; but they thought it would be best for me to preach in the episcopal church. By our conversing freely together many prejudices were removed, and all our hearts seemed to be united together. " Sunday 15.—-The episcopal church is not quite so large as the chapel in West-street: it is very elegant both with¬ out and within. The service began at half past nine. Such a congregation had not often been there before. I preached, REV. JOHN WESLEY. 235 on, 'God created man in his own image.? The people ' seemed-all, but their attention, dead.' In the afternoon the church was so filled, as (they informed me) it had not been for these fifty years. I preached on, ' God hath given us eternal life ; and this life is in his Son.' I believe God applied it to-many hearts. Were it only for this hour, I am glad I came to Holland. "Monday 16.—We set out in a track-skuit for the Hague: by the way we saw a curiosity;—the gallows near the canal surrounded with a knot of beautiful trees ! so the dying man will have one pleasant prospect here, whatever befals him hereafter! "At eleven we came to Delft, a large, handsome town; where we spent an hour at a merchant's house; who, as well as his wife, a very agreeable woman, seemed both to fear and to love God. Afterward we saw the great church, I think, nearly, if not quite, as long as York Minster. It is exceedingly light and elegant within, and every part is kept exquisitely clean. "When we came to the Hague, though we had heard much of it, we were not disappointed. It is indeed beauti¬ ful beyond expression. Many of the houses are exceed- ingly grand, and are finely intermixed with water and wood ; yet not too close, but so as to be sufficiently ven¬ tilated by the air. "Being invited to tea by Madam de Yassenaar, (one of the first quality in the Hague,) I waited upon her in the afternoon. She received us with that easy openness and affability, which is almost peculiar to Christians and per¬ sons of quality. Soon after came ten or twelve ladies more who seemed to be of her own rank, (though dressed quite plainly,) and two most agreeable gentlemen: one of whom, I afterward understood, was a colonel in the prince's guards. After tea I expounded the three first verses of the thirteenth chapter of the First Epistle to the Corinthians: Captain M. interpreted, sentence by sen¬ tence. I then prayed, and Colonel Y. after me. I believe this hour was well employed. " Tuesday 17.—We dined at Mrs. L 's, in such a family as I have seldom seen. Her mother, upward of seventy, seemed to be continually rejoicing in God her Saviour. The daughter breathes the same spirit; and he? 236 LIFE OF THE grandchildren, three little girls and a boy, seem to be all love. I hav.e not seen four such children together in England. A gentleman coming in after dinner, I found a particular desire to pray for him. In a little while he melted into tears, as indeed did most of the company. Wednes¬ day 18.—In the afternoon Madam de Yassenaar invited us to a meeting at a neighbouring lady's house. I expounded Gal. vi, 14, and Mr. M. interpreted as before. " Thursday 19.—We took boat at seven. Mrs. L.,.and one of her relations, being unwilling to part so soon, bore us company to Leyden, a large and populous town, but not so pleasant as Rotterdam. In the afternoon we went on to Haerlem, where a plain good man and his wife received us in a most affectionate manner. At six we took boat again: as it was filled from end to end, I was afraid we should not have a very pleasant journey. After Mr. Fer- guson had told the people who we were, we made a slight excuse, and sung a hymn: they were all attention. We then talked a little, by means of our interpreter, and desired that any of them who pleased would sing. Four persons did so, and sung well: after awhile we sung again. So did one or two of them: and all our hearts were strangely knit together, so that when we came to Amsterdam, they dismissed us with abundance of blessings. "Friday 20.—At five in the evenipg we drank tea at a merchant's, Mr. G 's, where I had a long conversation with Mr. de H,, one of the most learned as well as popular ministers in the city; and I believe (what is far more im¬ portant) he is truly alive to God. He spoke Latin well, and seemed to be one of a strong understanding, as well as of an excellent spirit. In returning to our inn, we called at a stationer's, and though we spent but a few minutes, it was enough to convince us of his strong affection, even to strangers. What a change does the grace of God make in the heart! Shyness and stiffness are now no more ! " Sunday 22.—I went to the New Church, so called still, though four or five hundred years old. It is larger, higher, and better illuminated than most of our cathedrals. The screen that divides the church from the choir, is of polished brass, and shines like gold. I understood the psalms that were sung, and the text well, and a little of the sermon; which Mr. de H. delivered with great earnestness. REV. JOHN WESLEV. 237 At two I began the service at the English church, an ele¬ gant building, about the size of West-street chapel; only it has no galleries, nor have any of the churches in Holland. I preached on Isaiah lv, 6, 7, and I am persuaded many received the truth in the love thereof. " After service I spent another hour at Mr. Y.'s. Mrs. V. again asked me abundance of questions concerning deliverance from sin, and seemed a good deal better, satis¬ fied with regard to the greatand precious promises;'"Whence we went to Mr. B., who had lately found peace with God. He was full of faith and love, and could hardly mention the goodness of God without tears. His wife appeared to be of the same spirit, so that our hearts were soon knit to¬ gether. From thence we went to another family, where a large company were assembled: but all seemed open to receive instruction, and desirous to be altogether Christians. "Wednesday 25.—We took boat for Haerlem. The great church here is a noble structure, equalled by few cathedrals in England, either in length, breadth, or height: the organ is the largest I ever saw, and is said to be the finest in Europe. Hence we went to Mr. Van K.'s, whose wife was convinced of sin, and brought to God, by reading Mr. Whitcfield's Sermons. " Here we were at home. Before dinner we took a walk in Haerlem wood. It adjoins to the town, and is cut out in many shady walks, with lovely vistas shooting out every way. The walk from the Hague to Scheveling is pleasant j those near Amsterdam more so ; but these exceed them all. " We returned in the afternoon to Amsterdam, and in the evening took leave of as many of our friends as we could. How entirely were we mistaken in the Hollanders, suppos¬ ing them to be of a cold, phlegmatic, unfriendly temper! I have not met with a more warmly affectionate people in all Europe! No, n®t in Ireland ! " Thursday 26.—Our friends having largely provided us with wine and fruits for our little journey, we took boat in a lovely morning for Utrecht, with Mr. Van K.'s sister, who in the way gave us a striking account. ' In that house,' said she, (pointing to it as we went by,) ' my husband and I lived : and that church adjoining it, was his church. Five years ago, we were sitting together, being in perfect health, when he dropped down, and in a quarter of an hour died ; 238 LIFE OF THE I lifted up my heart and said, Lord, thou art my husband now; and found no will but his.' This was a trial worthy of a Christian: and she has ever since made her word good. We were scarcely got to our inn at Utrecht when Miss L. came; I found her just such as I expected. She came on purpose from her father's country house, where all the family were. I observe of all the pious people in Holland, that, without any rule but the word of God, they dress as plainly as Miss March did formerly, and Miss Johnson does now! And considering the vast disadvantage they are under, having no connection with each other, and being under no such discipline at all as we are, I wondei at the grace of God that is in them. " Saturday 28.—I have this day lived fourscore years ; and by the mercy of God, my eyes are not waxed dim, and what little strength of body or mind I had thirty years since, is just the same I have now. God grant I may never live to be useless. Rather may I ' My body with my charge lay down, And cease at once to work and live.' " Sunday 29.—At ten I began the service in the English church in Utrecht. I believe all the English in the city were present, and forty or fifty Hollanders. I preached on the 13th of the First of Corinthians, I think as searchingly as ever in my life. Afterward a merchant invited me to dinner: for six years he had been at death's door by an asthma, and was extremely ill last night; but this morning, without any visible cause, he was well, and walked across the city to the church. He seemed to be deeply acquainted with religion, and made me promise! if I came to Utrecht again, to make his house my home. " In the evening, a large company of us met at Miss L.'s, where I was desired to repeat the substance of my morning sermon. I did so, Mr. Toydemea, (the professor of law in the university,) interpreting it sentence by sentence. They then sung a Dutch hymn, and we an English one. Afterward Mr. Regulet, a venerable old man, spent some time in prayer for the establishment of peace and love between the two nations. " Tuesday, July 1.—I called on as many as I could of my friends, and we parted with much affection. We then REV. JOHN WESLEY. 239 hired a yacht, which brought us to Helvoetsluys, about eleven the next' day. At two we went on board: but the wind turning against us, we did not reach Harwich till about nine on Friday morning. After a little rest, we procured a carriage, and reached London about eleven at night. " I can by no means regret either the trouble or expense which attended this little journey. It opened me a way into, as it were, a new world, where the land, the buildings, the people, the customs were all such as I had never seen before: but as those with whom I conversed were of the same spirit with my friends in England, I was as much at home in Utrecht and Amsterdam, as in Bristol and London.'.' That provision for the stability and the government of the Connection after his death, which had been to Mr. Wes¬ ley a matter of serious concern for several years, was accomplished in 1784, and gave him, whenever he subse¬ quently adverted to the subject, the greatest satisfaction. From this time he felt that he had nothing more to do, than to spend his remaining life in the same spiritual la¬ bours in which he had been so long engaged ; and that he had done all that a true prudence required, to provide for the continuance and extension of a work which had so strangely enlarged under his superintendence. This settlement was effected by a legal instrument, enrolled in chancery, called " A Deed of Declaration," in which one hundred preachers, mentioned by name, were declared to be " the conference of the people called Me¬ thodists." By means of this deed, a legal description was given to the term conference, and the settlement of the chapels upon trustees was provided for; so that the ap¬ pointment of preachers to officiate in them should be vested in the conference, as it had heretofore been in Mr. Wes¬ ley. The deed also declares how the succession and iden¬ tity of the yearly conference is to be continued, and con¬ tains various regulations as to the choice of a president and secretary, the filling up of vacancies, expulsions, &c. Thus " the succession," as it was called in Mr. Charles Wesley's letter, above quoted, was provided for; and the conference, with its president, chosen annually, came into the place of the founder of the Connection, and has so 240 LIFE OP fHE continued to the present day. As the whole of the preach¬ ers were not included in the deed, and a few who though! themselves equally entitled to be of the hundred preachers who thus formed the legal conference, were excepted, some dissatisfaction arose ; but as all the preachers were eligible to be introduced into" that body, as vacancies oc¬ curred, this feeling was but partial, and soon subsided.* All the preachers in full connection were also allowed to vote in the conference ; and subsequently, those who were not of the hundred, but had been in connection a certain number of years, were permitted, by their votes, to put the president into nomination for the confirmation of the legal conference. Thus all reasonable ground for mistrust and jealousy was removed from the body of the preachers at large; and with respect to the hundred preachers them¬ selves, the president being chosen annually, and each being eligible to that honour, efficiency of administration was wisely connected with equality. The consequence has been, that the preachers have generally remained most firmly united by affection and mutual confidence, and that few serious disputes have ever arisen among them, or have extended beyond a very few individuals. Ecclesiastical history does not, perhaps, present an instance of an equal number of ministers brought into contact so close, and called so frequently together, for the discussion of various subjects, among whom so much general unanimity, both as to doctrines and points of discipline has prevailed, join¬ ed with so much real good will and friendship toward each other, for so great a number of years. This is the more remarkable, as by their frequent changes from sta¬ tion to station, opposite interests and feelings are very * "Messrs. John Hampson, sen. and John Hampson, jun. his son; "William Eells, and Joseph Pilmoor, with a few other travelling preachers, were greatly offended that their names were not insert¬ ed in the deed. By Mr. Fletcher's friendly efforts, a partial reconcilia¬ tion was effected between them and Mr. Wesley; but it was of short continuance. Soon after the conference, 1784, Air. Hampson, senior, became an independent minister; but being old and infirm, and the people poor among whom he laboured, he was assisted out of the preachers' fund while he lived. He died in the year 1795. Mr. Hampson, jun. procured ordination in the Established Church, and'got a living in Sunderland, in the north of England. Mr. Eells also left the Connection, and, some time after, joined Mr. Atlay at Dewsbury; and Mr. Pilmoor went to America."—Myles. REV. jrofatf WESLEY. 241 often brought into conflict. The final decisions of the conference on their appointment to these stations, general¬ ly the most perplexing part of its annual business, are however, cheerfully or patiently submitted to, from the knowledge that each has of the public spirit with which that body is actuated, and the frank and brotherly manner in which all its proceedings are conducted. The order of proceeding in the business of the conference is the same as in the days of Mr. Wesley. It admits candidates for the ministry, on proper recommendation from the superin¬ tendents and district meetings; examines those who have completed their probation of four years, and receives the approved into full connection, which is its ordination; investigates, without any exception, the character and talents of those who are already in connection year by year; appoints the stations of the year ensuing; sends additional preachers to new places; receives the reports of the com¬ mittees appointed to manage and distribute various funds ; reviews the state of the societies; and issues an annual pastoral address. At the time of the meeting of the con¬ ferences, beside the Sunday services, public worship is held early in the morning, and in the evening of every day except Saturday, which is usually attended by great multi¬ tudes. The business of each conference, exclusive of that done in committees which meet previously, occupies, on the average, about a fortnight in every year. Were it not for the district meetings, composed of the preachers, and the stewards of a number of circuits, or stations, in different parts of the kingdom, (an arrangement which was adopted after Mr. Wesley's death,) the business of the conference would require a much longer time to transact; but in these meetings much is prepared for its final deci¬ sion. In this important and wise settlement of the government of the Connection by its founder, there appears but one regulation which seeins to controvert that leading maxim to which he had always respect, namely, to be guided by circumstances in matters not determined by some great principle. I allude to the proviso which obliges the con¬ ference not to appoint any preacher to the same chapel for more than three years successively, thus binding an itine¬ rant ministry upon the societies for ever. Whether this 21 242 life of the system of changing ministers be essential to the spiritual interests of the body or not, or whether it might not be usefully modified, will be matters of opinion ; bnt the point ought perhaps to have been left more at liberty.* CHAPTER XIII. The state in which the separation of the United States from the m?i.her country left the Methodist American societies had become a matter of serious concern to Mr. [* With the most respectful deference for the judgment of our be¬ loved author, whose Methodistical orthodoxy can so rarely even be questioned, we must beg leave to say that in our humble opinion this very proviso in Mr. Wesley's Deed of Declaration, for the permanent establishment of the fundamental principles by which the Conference should ever thereafter be governed, was one of the wisest measures in the whole instrument; and in this opinion, we greatly mistake if ninety-nine hundredths, at least, of the whole American Methodist Episcopal body, do not accord. The great inconvenience of this sys¬ tem to itinerant ministers themselves, and the consequent temptation to modify or to depart from it, we well know; and so did Mr. Wes¬ ley. His own inclination from youth, he often declared, was to saunter among Academic shades, and be a philosophical sluggard, rather than an itinerant preacher. He knew that similar temptations, with the enjoyments of domestic life, &c, would increase in their en¬ ticing power, as Methodism itself should increase, and the circum¬ stances both of the people and of the preachers become improved. And believing, as he firmly did, that an itinerant ministry was essen¬ tial to the most rapid and extensive spread of the Gospel, and to the salvation of the greatest number of souls, till time shall end, he hence, in conformity with this conviction, made this an unalterable principle in the economy of which he was the Founder. And has not all our experience attested his wisdom? Mr. Watson, we know, says no more than that " perhaps" the point ought to have been left more at liberty; and is by no means to be understood, we are persuaded, as being in favour of a change, even if the liberty were possessed. In¬ deed other denominations are now beginning both to see the incom¬ parable efficiency of the itinerant system, and to'act upon it;—not only by the establishment of itinerant missions, but of regular circuits, very much on our plan. We wish them God speed. But let us not retrograde whilst others advance. Rather, let us give the more earnest heed that none take our crown,—that we lose not the things we have already wrought, but receive a full reward. It is the glory of reviving this apostolical system that sheds its br ightest lustre on the name and the memory of Wesley. May it be that of his successors to perpe¬ tuate it, and, in order thereto, to keep themselves beyond the reach of even temptation to do otherwise. If in this note we seem to dissent in any measure from an incidental suggestion of our excellent author, we have the satisfaction, on the other hand, to be sustained by the judgment and wisdom of Mr Wesley.—American Edit.] REV. JOHN WESLEY. 243 Wesley, and presented to him a new case, for which it was imperative to make some provision. This however could not be done but by a proceeding which he foresaw would lay him open to much remark, and some censure, from the rigid English Episcopalians. But with him, the principle of making every thing indifferent give place to the neces¬ sity of doing good or preventing evil, was paramount; and when that necessity was clearly made out, he was not a man to hesitate. The mission of Messrs. Boardman and Pil- moor to America has been already mentioned. Two years afterward, in 1771, Mr. Wesley sent out Messrs. Asbury and Wright; and in 1773, Messrs. Rankin and Shadford. In 1777, the preachers in the different circuits in America had amounted to forty, and the societies had also greatly increased. These were scattered in towns and settlements so distant that it required constant and extensive travelling from the preachers to supply them with the word of God.* The two last-mentioned preachers returned, after employing themselves on the mission for about five years ; and Mr. Asbury, a true itinerant, who in this respect followed in America the unwearied example of Mr. Wesley, gradually acquired a great and deserved influ¬ ence, which, supported as it was by his excellent sense, moderating temper, and entire devotedness to the service of God, increased rather than diminished to the end of a protracted life. The American preachers, like those in England, were at first restrained by Mr. Wesley from administering either of the sacraments ; but when, through the war, and the acquisition of independence by the States, most of the clergy of the Church of England had left the country, neither the children of the members of the Me¬ thodist societies' could be baptized, nor the Lord's Supper [* Messrs. Boardman and Pilmoor returned to England in 1774; Messrs. Rankin and Rodda in 1777 ; and Mr. Shadford in 1778. Mr. Pilmoor came to America again after the revolutionary war, took orders in the Protestant Episcopal Church, and died, at an advanced age, in Philadelphia. Mi-. Watson states, in a preceding note, that Mr. Pilmoor was one of those few itinerant preachers who were much offended because his name was not inserted in Mr. Wesley's Deed ot Declaration, constituting the legal Conference. This, in all proba¬ bility, had a principal influence in his coming to America again, and taking orders in the Protestant Episcopal Church. We believe, how¬ ever, that he always continued friendly with our body, and lived and died an evangelical and highly respected minister.—American Edit.] 244 LIFE OF THE administered among them, without a change of the original •plan. Mr. Asbury's predilections for the former order of things prevented him from listening to the request of the American societies to be formed into a regular church, and furnished with all its spiritual privileges; and a divi¬ sion had already taken place among them. This breach, however, Mr. Asbury had the address to heal; and at the peace he laid the whole case before Mr. Wesley. The result will be seen in the following letter :— " To Dr. Coke, J\Ir. Asbury, and our Brethren in North America. "Bristol, September 10, 1784. " By a very uncommon train of providences, many of the provinces of North America are totally disjoined from their mother country, and erected into independent states. The English government has no authority over them, either civil or ecclesiastical, any more than over the states of Holland. A civil authority "is exercised over them, partly by the congress, partly by the provincial assem¬ blies. But no one either exercises or claims any eccle¬ siastical authority at all. In this peculiar situation, some thousands of. the inhabitants of these states desire my advice ; and in compliance with their desire, I have drawn up a little sketch. " Lord King's account of the primitive church convinced me, many years ago, that bishops and presbyters are the same order, and consequently have the same right to ordain. For many years I have been importuned, from time to time, to exercise this right, by ordaining part of our travelling preachers; but I have still refused, not only for peace' sake, but because I was determined, as little as possible, to violate the established order of the National Church to which I belonged. " But the case is widely different between England and North America. Here there are bishops who have a legal jurisdiction. In America there are none, neither any parislt ministers. So that, for some hundred miles together, there is none either to baptize or to administer the Lord's Sup¬ per. Here, therefore, my scruples are at an end; and I conceive myself at full liberty, as I violate no order, and invade no man's right, by .appointing and sending labourers into the harvest. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 245 " I have accordingly appointed Dr. Coke and Mr. Francis Asbury to be joint superintendents over our brethren in North America, as also, Richard Whatcoat and Thomas Yasey to act as elders among them, by baptizing and administering the Lord's Supper. And I have prepared a liturgy, little differing from that of the Church of England, (I think the best-constituted national church in the world,) which I advise all the travelling preachers to use on the Lord's day, in all the congregations, reading the litany only on Wednesdays and Fridays, and praying extempore on all other days. I also advise the elders to administer the Supper of the Lord on every Lord's day. " If any one will point out a more rational and Scrip¬ tural way of feeding and guiding those poor sheep in the wilderness, I will gladly embrace it. At present I cannot see any better method than that I have taken. " It l)as, indeed, been proposed to desire the English bishops to ordain part of our preachers for America. But to this I object, 1. I desired the bishop of London to ordain only one, but could not prevail: 2. If they consent¬ ed, we know the slowness of their proceedings; but the matter admits of no delay : 3. If they would ordain them now, they would likewise expect to govern them. And how grievously would this entangle us 1 4. As our Ameri¬ can brethren are now totally disentangled both from the state and from the English hierarchy, we dare not entangle them again either with the one or the other. They are now at full liberty simply to follow the Scriptures and the pri¬ mitive chu/ch. And we judge it best that they should stand fast in that liberty wherewith God has so strangely made therii free. " John Wesley." Two persons were thus appointed as superintendents or bishops, and two as elders, with power to administer the sacraments, and the American Methodists were formed into a Church, because they could no longer remain a so¬ ciety attached to a colonial establishment which then had ceased to exist. The propriety and even necessity of this step is sufficiently^apparent; but the mode adopted expos¬ ed Mr. Wesley to the sarcasms of his brother, who was not a convert to his opinion as to the identity of the order of bishops and presbyters ; and to all High Churchmen the 21* 246 LIFE OF THE proceeding has had the appearance of great irregularity. The only real irregularity, however, has been generally overlooked, whilst a merely apparent one has been made the chief subject of animadversion. The true anomaly was, that a clergyman of the Church of England should ordain, in any form, without separating from that Church, and formally disavowing its authority; and yet, if its spi¬ ritual governors did not choose to censure and disown him for denying the figment of the uninterrupted succession, which he openly said "he knew to be a fablefor maintain¬ ing that bishops and priests were originally one order only; (points, let it be observed, which perhaps but few Church¬ men will now, and certainly but few at that time, would very seriously maintain, so decisive is the evidence of Scrip¬ ture and antiquity against them, and so completely was the doctrine of the three orders given up by the founders of the English Church itself ;)* nor, finally, for proceeding to act upon that principle by giving orders ; it would be hard to prove that he was under any moral obligation to withdraw from the Church. The bishops did not institute proceed ings against him, and why should he formally renounce them altogether 1 It was doubtless such a view of his lib¬ erty, in this respect, that made him say on this occasion, * " I am not ashamed of the room and office which I have given unto me by Christ to preach his Gospel; for it is the power of God, that is to say, the elect organ or instrument ordained by God, and endued with such virtue and efficacy, that it is able to give, and administer effectually, everlasting life unto all those that will believe and obey unto the same. " Item. That this office, this power and authority, was committed and given by Christ and his Apostles unto certain persons only, that is to say, unto priests and bishops whom they did elect, call and admit thereunto, by their prayers, and imposition of .their hands, " The truth is, there is no mention made of any degrees err distinctions in orders, but only of deacons or ministers, and of priests or bishops."— A declaration made of the functions and divine institution of bishops and priests, Regno Hen. [in the reign of Henry] viii, circiter [about] JLD. 1537-40. This declaration was signed by Cromwell, the vicar-general, Cran- mer and Holgate, the archbishops, with many of their suffragans, together with other persons intituled " Sacra Theologies, Juris Ecclesiastici et CivUis, Professores," [Profes¬ sors of Divinity, and of Ecclesiastical and Civil Law.] Archbishop Usher's plan for comprehending the Presbyterians and Episcopalians in the time of Charles I, was also founded upon the principle of bishops and presbyters being one order. REV. JOHN WESLEV. 247 in answer to his brother, " I firmly believe that I am a Scriptural irtfoxovos as much as any man in England, or in Europe ; for the uninterrupted succession I know to be a fable, which no man ever did or can prove. But this does, in no wise, interfere with my remaining in the Church of England ; from which I have no more desire ,to separate than I had fifty years ago." The point which has been most insisted upon is the ab¬ surdity of a priest ordaining bishops. But this absurdity could not arise from the principle which Mr. Wesley had adopted, viz. that the orders were identical; and the cen¬ sure therefore rests only upon the assumption, that bishops and priests were of different orders, which he denied. He never did pretend to ordain bishops in the modern sense, but only according to his view of primitive episcopacy. Lit¬ tle importance therefore is to be attached to Mr. Moore's statement, (Life of Wesley,) that Mr. Wesley having named Dr. Coke and Mr. Asbury simply superintendents, he was displeased when, in America, they took the title of bishops. The only objection he could have to the name was, that from long association it was likely to convey a meaning beyond his own intention. But this was a matter of mere prudential feeling, confined to himself: so that neither are Dr. Coke and Mr. Asbury to be blamed for using that appellation in Mr. Wesley's sense, which was the same as presbyter as far as order was concerned ; nor the Ameri¬ can societies, (as they have sometimes inconsiderately been,) for calling themselves, in the same view, " The American Methodist Episcopal Churchsince their epis¬ copacy is founded upon the principle of bishops and pres¬ byters being of the same degree,—a more extended office only being assigned to the former, as in the primitive church. For though nothing can be more obvious than that the primitive pastors are called bishops, or presbyters indis¬ criminately in the New Testament; yet at an early period, those presbyters were, by way of distinction, denominated bishops, who presided in the meetings of the presbyters, and were finally invested with the government of several churches, with their respective presbyteries; so that two offices were then, as in this case, grafted upon the same order. Such an arrangement was highly proper for Ame¬ rica, where many of the preachers were young, and had 248 LIFE OF THE also to labour in distant and extensive circuits, and were therefore incapable of assisting, advising, or controlling each other. A travelling episcopacy, or superintendency, was there an extension of the office of elder or presbyter, but it of course created no other distinction; and the bish¬ ops of the Methodist Church in America have in practice as well exemplified the primitive spirit, as in principle they were conformed to the primitive discipline. Dr. Coke was only an occasional visitant in America, and though in the sense of office he was a bishop there, when he returned home, as here he had no such office, so he used no such title, and made no such pretension. Of this excellent man, it ought here to be said, that occasional visits to America could not satisfy his ardent mind ; he became the founder and soul of the Methodist missions in various parts of the world, first under the direction of Mr. Wesley, and then in conjunction with the conference; and by his voyages, tra¬ vels, and labours,he erected a monument of noble and disin¬ terested zeal and charity, which will never be obliterated.* But Mr. Asbury remained the preaching, travelling, self- denying bishop of the American societies, till afterward others were associated with him, plain and simple in their manners as the rest of their brethren, and distinguished from them only by " labours more abundant." It was by thus absurdly confounding episcopacy in the modern acceptation, and in Mr. Wesley's view, that a good deal of misplaced wit was played off on this occa¬ sion ; and not a little bitterness was expressed by many. He, however, performed a great and a good work, and not only provided for the spiritual wants of a people who indi¬ rectly had sprung from his labours ; but gave to the Ame¬ rican Church a form of administration admirably suited to a new and extensive empire, and under which the socie¬ ties have, by the Divine blessing, prospered beyond all precedent. Some letters passed between him and Mr. Charles Wesley on the subject of the American ordina- * Di\ Coke connected himself with Mr. Wesley in 1776, as stated ,by the latter in his Journal:—"Being at Kingston, near Tauntofi, I found a clergyman, Dr. Coke, late gentleman commoner of Jesus Col¬ lege, in Oxford, who came twenty miles on purpose. I had much conversation with him, and a union then began, which, I trust, shall never end." His name did not appear on the Minutes till the year 1778. In that year he was appointed to labour in London. rev john wesley. 249 tions. The first, written by Charles, was warm and re- monstrative; the second, upon receiving his brother's calm answer, was more mild, and shows, that he was less afraid of what his brother had done for America, than that Dr. Coke, on his return, should form the Methodists of England into a regular and separate church also! The concluding paragraph of this letter is, however, so affect ing, so illustrative of that oneness of heart which no difference of opinion between the brothers could destroy, that it would be unjust to the memory of both, not to insert it:— " I thank you for your intention to remain my friend. Herein my heart is as your heart. Whorn God hath joined, let not riivin put asunder. We have taken each other for better for worse, till death do us—.part 1 no: but eternally unite. Therefore, in the love which never faileth, I am " Your affectionate friend and brother, " C. Wesley." Some time after this Mr. Wesley appointed several of the English preachers, by imposition of hands, to adminis¬ ter the sacraments to the societies in Scotland. There the English establishment did not extend, and a necessity of a somewhat similar kind existed, though not of so press¬ ing a nature as in America. He, however, steadily objected to give this liberty, generally, to his preachers in England; and those who administered the sacraments in Scotland were not permitted to perform the same office in England upon their return. The reason why he refused to appoint in the same manner, and for the same purpose, for Eng¬ land, is stated in the letter above given. He was satisfied of his power, as a presbyter, to ordain for such an admi¬ nistration ; but, he says, " I have still refused, not only for peace' sake, but, because I was determined as little as pos¬ sible to violate the established order of the National Church to which I belonged." This was a prudent principle most sincerely held by him ; anclit explains his conduct in those particulars for which he has been censured by opposite parties. When it could not be avoided, without sacrificing some real good, he did violate " the established order," thinking that this order was in itself merely prudential. When that necessity did not exist, his own predilections, and the prejudices of many members of his societies. 250 LIFE OF THE enforced upon him this abstinence from innovation. It may, however, be asked, in what light Mr. Wesley's appoint¬ ments to the ministry, in the case of his own preachers, ought to be viewed. That they were ordinations to the work and office of the ministry, cannot be reasonably and Scripturally doubted ; and that they were so in his own intention, we have before shown from his own Minutes. It was required of them, as early as 1746, to profess to be " moved by the Holy Ghost, and to be called of God to preach." This professed call was to be tested by their piety, their gifts, and their usefulness ; all which points were investigated ; and after probation they were solemnly received by prayer " to labour with him in the Gospel and from that time were devoted wholly to their spiritual work,* including the pastoral care of societies. Here was ordination, though without imposition of hands, which, although an impressive ceremony, enters not, as both the Scriptures and the nature of the thing itself point out, into the essence of ordination; which is a separation of men, by ministers, to the work of the ministry by solemn prayer. This was done at every conference, by Mr. Wesley, who, as he had, as early as 1747, given up the uninterrupted succession, and the distinct order of bishops as a fable, left himself, therefore, at liberty to appoint to the ministry in his own way. He made, it is true, a distinction at one time between the primitive offices of evangelists or teach¬ ers, and pastors, as to the right of giving the sacraments, which he thought belonged to the latter only ; but as this implied, that the primitive pastors had powers, which the primitive evangelists, who ordained them, had not, it was too unsupported a notion for him long to maintain. (See JVfoore's Life of Wesley, book viii, chap, ii.) Yet, had this view of the case been allowed, the preachers were not mere teachers, but pastors in the fullest sense. They not only taught, but guided, and managed the societies ; receiv¬ ing members, excluding members, and administering pri¬ vate, as well as public, admonitions; and if they were constituted teachers and pastors by his ordination, without * It is observable, that in the conference of 1768 he enjoined absti¬ nence from all secular things upon them, both on the Scriptural prin¬ ciple, 1 Tim. iv, 13; and on the ground, that the Church, "in her office of ordination," required this of ministers. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 251 the circumstance of the imposition of hands, it is utterly impossible to conceive that that ceremony conveyed any larger right, as such, to administer the sacraments, in the case of the few he did ordain in that manner for Scotland and America. As to them it was a form of permission and appointment to exercise the right. His appointments to the ministry every conference necessarily conveyed all the rights of a pastor, because they conveyed the pastoral office ; but still it did not follow, that all the abstract rights of the ministry, thus conveyed to the body of the preachers, should be actually used. It was not imperative upon them to exercise all their functions ; and he assumed no impro¬ per authority as the father and founder of the Connection, to determine to what extent it was prudent to exercise them, provided he was satisfied that the sacraments were not put out of the power of the societies to observe. He ex¬ ercised this suspending authority even ever those preachers whom he appointed to give the sacraments in Scotland, by prohibiting them from administering in the English socie¬ ties, over which they became pastors. So little difference did his ordination by imposition of hands make in their case, even in his own estimation.* It was, when it fol¬ lowed the usual mode of introducing candidates into the ministry, a mere form of permission to exercise a previous right in a particular place, and a solemn designation to this service according to a liturgical form which he greatly admired; but the true ordination of those who were so set apart to administer the sacraments to the ministry itself, was the same as that of the rest of their brethren, and took place at the same time. Thus, in Mr. Wesley's strongest language to Mr. Charles Perronet and the other preachers who thought it their duty to administer, he places his objec¬ tion upon the decisive ground of his thinking it "a sin;" but not from their want of true ordination, to which he makes no allusion but he thought it sinful, because it * When a few of the preachers received ordination from a Greek bishop, then in England, and from whom he was falsely reported himself to have sought consecration; he would not suffer them to administer, although he did not doubt that the Greek was a true bishop. f As early as 1756, he says to some of the preachers, "You think it is a duty to administer. Do so, and therein follow your own con¬ science." That is, they were at liberty to leave him; but not a word 252 LIFE OF THE would be injurious to the work of God, and so contrary to his word and will. That it was not in his view " a sin,'' for want of mere imposition of hands, is clear from the facts, that, in one case, he gave to one of the preachers leave to baptize and give the sacrament in particular cir cumstances, although he had no other ordination than his being " received into full connection'- at the conference like the rest; and allowed two others, Mr. Highfield in England, and Mr. Myles in Dublin, to assist him in giving the sacrament to the great offence of the Church people there.* That the original designation of the preachers to the ministry was considered by the conferences after his death,—when they were obliged, in order to meet the spiritual wants and Scriptural demands of the people, to administer the Lord's Supper to the societies in England, —as a true and full ordination to the whole office of the Christian ministry, is clear from their authorizing the preachers to give the sacraments, when requested by the societies, without reordination for this purpose, although they had Mr. Wesley's Presbyterian ordination by impo¬ sition of hands among themselves, and at their command, if they had judged it necessary to employ it. Their whole proceeding in this respect was merely to grant permission to exercise powers which they believed to have been pre¬ viously conveyed by Mr. Wesley, in doing which they differed from him only in not marking that permission with any new form. Perhaps it might have been an improve¬ ment, had they accompanied all their future ordinations by the laying on of the hands of the president for the time about the invalidity of their appointment to the whole work of the ministry. * Mr. Wesley's innovations on church order in Dublin, appear, from several of his letters, to hare produced somewhat outrageous attacks upon him from several quarters in that city. In one of them he says, " Every week I am bespattered in the public papers. Many are in tears on the occasion; many terribly frightened, and crying out, ' 0 what will the end be?' What will it be? Why, glory to God in the highest, and peace and good will among men." Such was his rejoinder to these High Church alarms. At the same time it must be conceded, that, however faithful Mr. Wesley was in abiding by his leading prin¬ ciple of making mere adherence to what was called "regular," give place to the higher obligation of doing good, he was sometimes apt, in defending himself, to be too tenacious of appearing perfectly con¬ sistent. REV. JOHN WESLEY. 253 being, assisted by a few of the senior preachers, and by using the fine Ordination Service of the Church of Eng¬ land : not indeed, that this would have given a tittle more of validity to the act; but the imposition of hands would have been in conformity to the usage of the majority of churches, and an instance of deference to an ancient Scriptural form of solemn designation and blessing, used on various occasions. The whole of Mr. Wesley's pro¬ ceedings, both as to America and Scotland, would have been as valid on Scriptural grounds, had there been no other form used than simple prayer for men, already in the ministry, going forth on an important mission ; but as the New Testament exhibited a profitable example of imposi¬ tion of hands in the case of Paul and Barnabas, who had been long before ordained to the highest order of the ministry, when sent forth into a new field of labour, this example was followed.* * From the preceding observations, it will appear that Mr. Wes¬ ley's ordinations, both for America eftid Scotland, stood upon much the same ground. The full powers of the ministry had before been conveyed to the parties; but now they had a special designation to exercise them in every respect, in a new and peculiar sphere. Still their ordination, by imposition of hands, did not imply that their former ordination was deficient, as to the right of administering the sacraments which it conveyed; for then, how came Dr. Coke, who was already a presbyter of the Church of England, to be ordained again, when, according to Mr. Wesley's own View, he could not be higher in order than a presbyter, although his powers might be enlarged as to their application ? The conference after Mr. Wesley's death took therefore the true ground, in considering the act of admission into the ministry, so as to be devoted wholly to it, and to exercise the pastoral charge, to be a true and Scriptural ordination both to preach the word and to administer the sacraments; making wholly light of the absurd pretensions of a few among the preachers, who thought that they had received something more than their brethren from the mere ceremony of the imposition of Mr. Wesley's hands, subsequent to their ordinary appointment by him when received into the body. Some of these, at the first conference after Mr. Wesley's death, stood upon this point; but Mr. Benson refuted their notion, that imposition of hands was essential to ordination. He proved from the New Tes¬ tament that this was but a circumstance, and showed that the body had always possessed a ministry Scripturally and therefore validly ordained, although not in the most customary or perhaps in the most influential form. With Mr. Benson the conference coincided-; so that ordination, without imposition of hands, has continued to be the gene¬ ral practice to the present time. It is remarkable, that the few preachers who insisted upon imposition of hands being essential to ordination, and plumed themselves upon being distinguished from their brethren 254 LIFE OF THE But we return to the continued and unabated labours of this venerable servant of God. In 1786, at the Bristol conference, the old suDject of separating from the Church was again discussed, and, " without one dissenting voice," it was determined to continue therein ; " which determina¬ tion," he remarks, " will, I doubt not, stand, at least till I am removed into a better world." After the conference was concluded, he paid a second visit to Holland, in company with Mr. Brackenbury and Mr. Broadbent, preached in various places, expounded to private companies, and engaged in conversation with many learned and pious individuals. On his return to England, his Journal presents the usual record of constant preaching and travelling, inteispersed with useful remark, and incident. A few gleanings from it will be read with interest:— " Dec. 23, 1786.—By great importunity I was induced (having little hope of doing good) to visit two of the felons in Newgate, who lay under sentence of death. They appeared serious : but I can lay little stress on appearances of this kind. However, I wrote in their behalf to a great man. And perhaps it was in consequence of this that they had a reprieve. " Sunday 24.—I was desired to preach at the Old Jewry; but the church was cold, and so was the congregation. We had congregations of another kind the next day, Chrismas- day, at four in the morning, as well as five in the evening, at the New Chapel, and at West-street Chapel about noon. " Sunday 31.-—From those words of Isaiah to Hezekiah, ' Set thy house in order,' I strongly exhorted all who had not done it already, to settle their temporal affairs without because Mr. Wesley's hands had been laid upon them, did not remem¬ ber a passage in a published letter of Mr. Wesley to Mr. Walker of Truro, dated as long before as 1756, which sufficiently shows how totally disconnected the two things were in his mind; or that, if they adverted to it, its bearing in his controversy with Mr. Walker should not have been perceived: "That the seven deacons were outwardly ordained even to that low office, cannot be denied. But Paul and Bar¬ nabas were separated for the work to which they were called. This was not ordaining them; it was only inducting them to the province for which our Lord had appointed them. For this end the prophets and teachers fasted, prayed, and 'laid their hands upon them,' a rite which was used, not in ordination only, but in blessing, and on many