•THIS- UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO (Founded by John J), Rockefeller) RELIGIOUS EDUC; TIOH Ifl HEGRO COLLEGES A DISSERT TIOH Submitted to th© Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Literature in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts (Graduate Divinity School: Religious Education) * 1 1 " " r """""■ , ■ t By David Henry Sims mrncT Quarter 1917 BIBLIOGRAPHY X. Sources American Missionary Association—Report, 1916 Baptist Missionary Society (Womans)—Reports, 1910-1916 Catalogues--Those of legro Colleges, 1916-1917 Dubois, W. E. B.—Morals and Manners Among legro Americans. At¬ lanta U. Publication Ho. 18 Journal of the Proceedings of the A. M» E. Church (General Con¬ ference ), 1916 Journal of the Proceeding® of the Methodist Episcopal Church (General Conference), 1916 Jones, Thomas J.—Begro Education, United States Bureau of ed¬ ucation. Bulletin 38 and 39, 1916 Jones, Thomas J.—Becent Movements in Begro Education. United States Bureau of Education, 1912, Vol. I questionnaires—From Hegro Colleges, 1917 United States Bureau of Education Investigations—Education in the South. Bulletin 30, 1913 Work, Monroe, —Begro Year-Book, 1914, 1915, 1916. Young Men's Christian Association—Beport of the International Committee, Hay 18, 1916. Year-Book 1915-1916 II. General References Athearn, w. s.~Religion In the Curriculum-Religious Education Bolton, B. E.—Principles of Education . Cope, H. F. —The Efficient Layman . " r-Fifteen Years of the Religious Education Associa¬ tion. American Journal of Theology, July 1917, p.385ff. Committee Report—standardization of Biblical Courses. Rel. Educ. August, 1916, p.314 ff. Crawford—The Media of Religious Impression in College. 33. T:. 1914: 494 ff. B Dewey, John--Ethical Principles Underlying Muoation. Moral Principles In Education. Irons, T. S. p»—»$he University Young Men's Christian Association As A Training School For Religious leaders. Rel. Educ. 19o8 Powler, H. P.—The Contents of an Ideal Curriculum of Religious Education for Colleges, lei. Educ. 1915, p. 355 ff. Hardy, E. H.— The Churches and The Educated Men, Haslett, S. B.—Pedagogical Bible School. Parts I and II. International Sunday School Association—Organized ^ork in Amer¬ ica, Vol. XIII. Kent, C. P.—Training the-College Teacher. Rel. Educ, 1916, Vol. 10, p. 327 Monroe, P.—Cyclopedia of Eduoatlon, Vol.'I, p. 370. Moore E. C.—What Is Education. Morgan A.--Education and Social Progress. Peabody, P. G. — The Religious Education Of An American Child. Rel. Educ. 1915, p. 107 Peritz, I. J.—The Content® of an Ideal Curriculum of Religious Instruction. Rel. Iduc. Vol. 10, 1915, p.362 Reed, C.—The Essential Place of Religion In Education, n. E. A. Monograph Publication 1913, r. 66 Rhees R.—Evangelization of Education. Biblical *?orld, Aug. 1916 p. 66 Rugh C. E.--The. Essential Place of Religion in Education. IT. E. p . Monograph "ublioation, 1913 p. 3 Wood, I. T.—The Contents of an Ideal Curriculum of Religious Instruction for Colleges. Rel. Educ. 1915, Vol. 10, p.332 --The Survey of Progress In Religious and Moral Ed¬ ucation. Rel. Educ. 1915, Vol. 10, p. 114. c QUTLIlfB RELIGIOUS TOOCATIOI I® BEGHO COLLEGES Introduction 1 The Awakened sense of responsibility for religious training. a) Observed in periodicals of churches and colleges. b) In co-operation given agencies for higher life. c) Agents of this new consciousness are chiefly the Reli¬ gious Education Association and the Rational Education Association, 2 The scope and method of this investigation. a) Scope (1) Quantitative Aspects (2) Qualitative Aspects b) Method (1) Personal investigation of typical Negro institu¬ tions. {2) Questionnaires (3) Critical reviews of published statements. (4) Report* of denominations. Blscussion I Eeligious Education in Denominational and Private Institution! b. 1. The teachers of religious education, A. Their academic training 3. Time given to the teaching of the subjects* r. The teachers' attitude. 2. The Courses of Religion A. Owrieuluia Courses (1) Required courses (2) Elective courses (3) The enrollment in the courses (4) Credits offered 3. Voluntary Courses (1) Description (£) lumber enrolled £ Religious Services A. Prescribed services (1) Chapel services (2) The College Church (a) Sunday services (b) Week services (3) Week of Prayer for Colleges (4) Morning and evening devotions (5) The quiet hour 3. Voluntary religious services (1) The Y. M. C. A. (2) The T. W. C. a. (3) The Student Volunteers (4} The Young PeoplesT Meetings (6) Temperance meetings? (6) Missionary meetings 4.Sxpressional Activities A. Expressional Activities at the College 2. Bxprefsional Activities in the Community "8 £• Financing religious education in denominational a nd private Colleges and Universities. II. Religious Education in State Colleges and ^nivereitigf?. 1. The Teachers 2. The Courses 3. Religious Services 4. Expressional Activities 5. Financing Religious Education III. The Conceptions of Religious Education in legro Colleges IV. Some Current Conceptions and Principles of Religious Education V. An Evaluation of Religious Education in liegro Institutions 1. Problem of Religious Education in Hegro Colleges 2. Outlook for Improvement Appendix Enrollment of Students in Religious Education Courses. 1 mil&IOCTS EDUCATION IB BIG HO COLLEGES AID UJIIVERSITIES Within the last few decades a deepening sense of responsi¬ bility for the religious direction of the American College i?nd University students lias a risen* The problem of religious educa¬ tion lias become a part of our national consciousness. The tern "religious education" lias come into general circulation respect¬ ing every grade of education* And in every instance it seems to be more or less a characterization of an ideal type of education and a method of realising that type. Evidence of this is pre¬ sented in the numerous religious t semi^religious and educational periodicals, as well as in the reports and published statements of educational institutions and organisations since 1902. There is a new conscience for character and social useful¬ ness in the college and university. It manifests itself in top¬ ics lander discussion in conferences of educators, in their per¬ sonal inquiries, and in the hearty co-operation given agencies for the higher life. In the whole range of education there is a growing recognition of the religious and moral elements inherent in all education* The former emphasis on the difference between o religious education and secular education is passing. The func¬ tion of teaching is being lifted into the religious realm. Ed¬ ucation is aiming to develop men f nd women to their highest pos¬ sibilities for their own salens and for the sake of their contri¬ bution to the welfare and progress of society. ^ The leligious Education Association, organized in 1902, is one of the chief##*, if not the chiefest, agencies in hapten- lng Hk&B new §ra* The secretary has Bald: "The leadership of *fcl« new crusade seemed successful in directing a passion for religious education born of the fusion of the scientific spirit with the spirit of humanistic idealism." Between 1903 and 1913 ever #180,000 were spent in religious educational endeavor. The period subsequent to 1913 shows a larger proportionate expendi¬ ture, The larger part of these amounts stand for gifts. I /' ■ oollege grade of work prescribed but no studentp hetriculatefl 3 -to" -CgJlLJL nUo taking the courses. They are not included In this stud; t>OT obvious reasons/f] The term^'colleges end universities" O&Lbj a© means-m*safe criteria for measuring efficiency of. or even for classification of legro colleges and universities, fhi condition is nit peculiar to Begro college8. Those for whites» in the South especially, present the same condition of variety. It seems that there has been a special mania^in our South land joially^for setting up a laudable ideal in the classifioatioz of educational institutions, and then no riding up to it during sut «»/!«»«-h *t,na mhAtr ieve there is much in a name or title. This keen sense of potentiality manifested in the classification college or university, is too often misleading if taken on fait| Another phase of this classification nay throw some light on the numerous negro "colleges" with such wide divergences in standards of curricula. In the °outh, #9,0C0t00© are spent for / the elementary education of thehkgro, when ^25,000,000 should be used for that purpose by the States. There are 1,000,000 without any school facilities at all, and 2,00",000 who cannot read or write. Then the money spent dbosn1t begin to meet the needs of those i&o are receiving the education given. For ex¬ ample, the South spends $10.23 for each white student of elemen¬ tary age and 2.82 for eachHegro^ student of the seme age who at present given the opportunity to go to school. 'Thus many institutions of a private nature are stimulated by this ^tate of <> a.[Q. affairs and seek to meet it. But in so doing, they various tives fci1 so doing and perhaps bhey all could not Justly be labelled sinister. 4 It is evident then that our study deals with 38 private colleges , all denoainational except four, and six state college** on land-gsiat fcaaas. fht mthoi of the thesis has assumed a four-fold form. The writer took nine months in making personal investigation of twelve typical Uegro colleges. One in the Northwest, one in the Northeast, and ten in the South. Of these ten, five arc? in Geor4 gia, two in South Carolina, two in Tennessee and one in Alabama, The second method was the questionnaire. Questionnaire Ho. 1 was sent to €0 educational institutions. 38 responded in full, light returned the questionnaires with some answers, These were excluded from the study because they lacked desired data. A second questionnaire was used. It contained d£ ta from students in the respective institutions who were typical. Also the Y. H. C. i. and the Y. W. C„ 4. leaders contributed to this set of data. Questionnaire So. % Beligious Education In Begre College® 1. Hame of the institution, president and dean. 2. Enrollment in the college department. 5. ^hat religious services are held by the school? Is attendance required and what number attend? 4. What curriculum courses in religious education have you,via: Bible courses, Sunday School Teacher Training, :syeholory of Religion, Philosophy of Religion, Beligioue : edagogy, So¬ cial Service, Social F/fchicp, Ilethodr of rocial Reform, etc. 5 u* WK&eli of the courses are elective and which are required? - Bow much orodlt it given for each? 6. Hare yom ifif ©omraes In the Seminary or Divinity school for Hill** f©u givo college credits? ^at are they? 7« Are the teachers of ottrrioulusi courses of religious education professionally trained for their task* for example; were they trained ia a school of religious education or in a divinity echool? What Institution attended and what degrees received? B. How winy students are in your curriculum courses of religious oduoatioa? 9. What voloatary religions organizations have you, for example: the Y. M* C. A., T. ■ ??« C. A. , students Toltmteer Movement, B. T« TJ. , C. ft. Iiesgue# College Church, Sunday School, etc. ? 10. Are the teachers or conductors of your voluntary organisation professionally trained fvaz? as in question 7}? 11. Wow many students are enrolled in your voluntary organizations 12. What opportunity have the s tudents for the expression of i- deals received through these organizations? What Christian work is done9 such as handling hoys' of girls' clubs, minister¬ ing to the poor and Infirm, orphans, foreigh missions, vis¬ iting prisons, asylums, or orphanages, teaching vacation Bible schools, etc.? 13. What is your own estimate of the religious value of your courses and organizations? Rave you any definite fc ts upon which to base your estimate? 14. DAes your school have a special appropriation for religious work, viz: for the Y. M. C. a., for a chaplain, college pas- 6 Jfjr, «tc.? 1ft In your opinion, ajre the Begro colleges meeting the need® of deftnit# religious training? 16. Any other info zraat ion or suggestion concerning religious ed¬ ucation in Hsgro colleges will be gladly received. ' uestionnaire Ho. II 1, What is your estimate of the religious services at your col¬ lege, vis; Church preaching service, Sunday School, Young People's meetings, Week-day Prayer meetings, "eek of Prayer for colleges, Y. M. C* A., Y. W. C. A. or any other religious service? (Mark each according to your estimate as Church 1, Pra^rermeeting 2, Y. W. c. A. 3 etc.) 2. What are the items of importance in these respective services, the sermon* prayer, ritual, congregational singing, special music etc.? 3# Why did you make the proceeding ranking as you did? 4. What suggestion have you to offer for the improvement of these services? Whet other criticism have you to offer on these services? 5, What is your church affiliation? For example, Baptist, Metho¬ dist, Presbyterian, etc.? The majority of legro institutions—all included in this study have published statements concerning religious education la their respective curricula and voluntary organizations, These statera nts appear in announcements, catalogues, and reports, fhese have been secured and critically reviewed. From the^e the 7 mj&Ttt Of religiose edmeationt the attitude towards religious ed- the aim and their own Ideas of the accomplishments of religious education nay bo lUinBiwwd in a large measure The last necrne resorted to was the report? of denominations 08 education. These reports appear in various forms, sometimes in year books. At other times in the quadrennial reports, viz: the general Conference reports? of the Methodist Episcopal, the African Methodist Episcopal, the A. M. I. Zion and Colored Meth¬ odist Eposcopal Churches. I. Beligious Education in Private and Benomina- tional Colleges and Universities. 1. fhe firBt and most important factor in this study is the teaoher. What is the type of teachers in Hegro institutions, for the progressive socialization of the individuals whom they instruct. The students religious life will be conditioned very llfeely, by the teachers in the colleges. A. The academic preparation of the teachers. There .are 86 teachers of religious education in some form in these institutions. Of these 86 instructors, 64 have had srome degree of professional training for their tasks. Thirty-one of those i&o have received professional training are graduates of first rank lMtitutloiw. The among' the best in the country and of long standing. They are: Yale College 1; Tale Divinity School 3; Drew Theological Seminary 3; Oberlin College and Divinity School 2; Ohio "^esleyan University 1; Columbia University 1; Union Seminary 1; Boston University £: Colgate University 1; Rochester Theological Seminary 2; Univer- 8 •tty eX Chiesg* and Pivinity School 3; Princeton University 2; Mwrtm Theologleal Seminary 2: Chicago Bible Training School g; &rimell College 1; Hillsdal© College 1; lew York School of Phil¬ anthropy 1; Andover theological Seminary 1; Union Theological Seminary 1; Chicago Geological Seminary 1. The remaining 33 teachers were trained in Hegro seminaries and colleges, the most of them eoming fro© the older institrations for Begroes, such as -Vilberforce, Howard University, Lincoln Uni¬ versity, Talladega College, and Fisk University, Though these latter have had some type of professional train¬ ing, it still remains for ur to see the types. The "old line" theological course claims most of this number as ite representa¬ tives. We should be surprised if it were otherwise, because com¬ paratively recent it has been, since the seminaries of America have begun what they tern a reconstruction of the seminary curri¬ culum* The meet of these men and women are middle-aged persons and had taken their courses before the evolution took place. Of the sixty-four who have had professional training, forty-five have had the "old line" seminary courses which contained no courses in "scientific religious education' . I am not at this point ar¬ guing whether they were the losers or gainers. I am simply stat¬ ing a fact in terms i&leh all students of religions education understand. The remaining nineteen had received courses in scien¬ tific religious education, either theoretical and laboratory ex¬ ercises, or laboratory courses in practical social service end philanthropy. 57 of these teachers are ministers. Ia this study it was discovered that very few of the teach¬ ers of religious education have chairs of Heligious Education. 9 Host #£ them give only part-time to that wrk and their programs are divided ttp't* meat the urgent needs of other departments in the colleges and universities. Three are teachers of education and give courses in the rsychology of the Bible, the Psychology of laligien, and the Educational Method applied to the Bible, ^hese three give the rest of their time to the college and normal school courses in Education. Four have "Bible chairs" end give their time to the teaching of the english 3ible courses entirely. All others are only part-time religious education teachers, so far as curriculum courses are concerned. C. What is the attitude of these teachers toward their task? In the first place we note a large amount -of optimism over results achieved or thought to be achieved or hoped to be achiev¬ ed. Sixty-four of them said directly, in asnwer to a question • concerning their attitude and estimate, that they were optimis¬ tic. Seven were uncertain, and withheld their opinions and three were very pessimistic indeed. The presidents or deans answer¬ ing the major questionnaire were ^uite certain that the teachers had the attitude of sustained interest in the work of religious education# Teachers and conductors of voluntary religious courses and organizations. Much of the work in religious training in legro A colleges is done by voluntary organisation, some of the most pro¬ minent of which are the Young Men1? Christian Association, the Young Women's Christian Association, the Student Volunteer Kove- ment associations, the Young Peoples Societies of the various de- (JLAJL nominations and Temperance ; oeietier. Sometimes theyarr central- 10 $*t$ and sometimes otherwise* But our task in this chapter is to see what pyfcj&smtioji. the leaders and instructors of these or¬ ganizations hare received, the time given and the attitude. These volunteer® are, for the most part, not professional¬ ly trained. Only seven are so reported, end six of the seven are professors wh© give Bible of/social service courses upon the invitation of these voluntary organizations. There fts only one legro college g so far as has he en ascertained, in all Ambries that has a paid director of one of these organizations, professionally trained. Perhaps it would not he unjust to name that institu¬ tion, on account of it© uniqueness, at least* It is Howard Uni¬ versity; the leader is the Y, M. C. a. secretary who has heen train- • td at the Y. iff. C. A. Training School and is a salaried officer of the University. The most accurate account given of the amount of time spent /L- - CI by these instructors and conduotorsjJ«H*e found in the reports of the Young Men's Christian Association. There are 36 young Men's Christian Associations end 36 Toung Women's Christian Associations in the institutions represented in this study. The average time spent per week for the leaders of thepe two organizations is one hour and forty-seven minutes. Of this time one hour is spent * in the weekly meetings (regular) and the other forty-six minutes in the meeting committees and planning for activities of the as¬ sociations, or in conducting Bible" study, Mission study or social service classes. Extra time not counted in the estimate ie given on extraordinary occasions. The average time given to the young peoples meetings if? an 11 b»tor OA ttJjrat**. About the same would a* doubt ropresant ®ther voluntary organisations t the social service work except- •I perhaps* Wit present study has data only on -Hie tiiae spent In certain easts. fhe attltuda of the volunteer is, as would, be expected us¬ ually that cf eptis&Bxa and sustained interest* He cr shw is se¬ lected by tho students* and on the basis of soae manifested inter¬ est in the particular line of endeavor, 2. Courses of Religious Education The courses are net the only agencies, besides the teachers, for assisting college men and women in acquiring a religions per- -dfcvs- scnality which will function efficiently in society. Sateless, they are one of the factors|and are connected with the educative process in such a fashion that any endeavor similar to the present cue must consider them. A* Tfhat^are the courses included in the curricula of these institutions? How much credit is given for thea, and how many students are affected by them? These querries are necessary to find the part which intel¬ lectual knowledge plays in the educative process, in behalf of re¬ ligious education. Does intellectual knowledge of this parties lar type function religiously in the lives of the students? Bet'us^ investigate the requisdd courses of the curricu¬ lum. The Bible is the leader in the list of requirements. Thirty six colleges and universities require it as a text book. Three ,;r<: • ,4 give it as an elective snd one offer it at all. These exceptions are Howard university, Talladega College, Tillotson College and Straight College respectively. 12 Social Ethiea 1® prescribed by ten colleges as follows: Al- len University^ Irane College, Clark University, Paine College, Hod- ger Williams College, Bust College, Samuel Houston College, Shert- er College, Spellman Seminary, Virginia Theological Seminary end College. Bishop College, Claflin University, Clark University, Vnox- ville College and Samuel Houston College have required their stu¬ dents at some stage in their college course t© study Christian Evidences, Morris Brown University, Paine College, and Swift Memorial College prescribe Bourses in social service or Practical Sociology. Comparative Religion, a course in Sunday Teacher Training, Hew Testament History, Philosophy of Heligion and Church History are designated as requirements by State University, Knoxvllle College, Iiane College, Paine College and ^noxville College respect¬ ively. Spelraan Seminary, Tcugaloo, State University, Flsk univer¬ sity, and Claflin University require courses in Hebrew History. The requirements in legro colleges are as follows: thirty-five require the Bible as a text book; ten prescribe social Kthiee; six prescribe Christian Evidences; three make courses in Soc(b\&1 Service or Practical Sociology requirement^ five prescribe Hebrew History; one college requires Comparative Heligion; one, Sunday School Teacher Training; one Hew Testament History; one Philosophy of Heligion; and two Church History. 2. ,,!e shall omit the consideration of the amount of credit given and the number of students enrolled in these courses until we have given attention to elective courses. Here the Sunday School Teacher Training courses lead. They 13 **• eei^ceite courses in most instances. In other wordst they composed chiefly of sketches of child psy¬ chology* principles of .teaching, school management, Old Testament KlMesy.* Hew Testament History, geography of Bible lands and sto¬ ry telling. Shese courses have become very popular in Uegro col- ^•8 during the last seven or eight years. Dr. H. C. Lyman, S uperintendent of the legro work under the auspices* of the Inter¬ national Sunday School Association, has done incalculable good in the way of encouraging this particular kind of work. The great majority of these oourese has been installed as a result of his endeavor* Only three of the £1 courses in these colleges have been established independently of his encouragement and in most instances his formal installation. The following institutions have the courses in Sunday School Management, Organization and and teaching which they offer as e3e ctives: Atlanta diversity, Benedict College, Lane College, Claflin University, Clark Univer¬ sity, Fi»k University, Howard University, Lincoln University, Livingstone College, Morehouse College, Morgan College, Hew Or¬ leans University, Bodger Williams Jniversity, State University, Swift Memorial College, Talladega College, Tillotson College, Wilber force University, Spellman Seminary, and Morris Brown Col¬ lege. Social Ethics is elective in Virginia Union University, Mor¬ ris Brown Cellege, Pisk University, and Knoxville College. Social service courses are offered under the elective pro¬ vision in several institution?, ^even of.them offer there courses *mter their departments of sociology. They are: Atlanta Univer¬ sity# Bnediet Cellege, risk University, Howard University, Mor- 14 gam College» Talladega College, Virginia Union University and wii- b*rfor«e0niversity. Comparative Religion is offered in Talladega College and U&iversity. ffc# Principles of Religious Education and the Organization of Religious Bducation have been offered recently by Talladega College ant Fisk University. Howard UfclTerslty, fCaoxville College, and Morris Brown Col¬ lege offer in their elective systems lew Testament Greek, Tfhe Bible is elective at Fisk, Tillotson and Howard Univer¬ sity. Mission Study is elective at Talladega College. Howard University has a wide range of eiectives covering a large scope of religious subjects which are offered in the How¬ ard. School of theology. They are Hew Testament and Old Testament introduction courses. Comparative Religion, Church History, He¬ brew, Missions, The Teaching of Jesus, The Teaching of Paul, and U. f* Biographical courses* "ilberforce has a similar condition. They allow lew Testament Greek, Hebrew, social Service courses, the Life of Christ and the Life of aul te count toward the Bachelor of Arts Degree. These courser, however, are all given in Payne Theological Seimnary which is a part of the " ilberforce system. Morehouse College has a combination of the elective and pre¬ scribed system relative to the Bible. The Inglish Bible is re¬ quired iii the Freshman year but elective in all of the other years, fhs following will show the courses in religion which are offered ia Begro colleges and will designate the number of institutions offering the several courses as w*ll as whether they are elective 15 or ?79BCr3.D0tt Courees Elective agliefe Bifcle $ 2• Philosophy &f Religion X 2 «w feataaent Greek 5 4* Hebrew g 5. The Principle® of Religions Education 2 6. The Methods aad Organization of B. £. 2 7. Serial Ethics 4 8. Social Service 7 9. Comparative Religions 2 10. Hebrew History 11. lew Testament History IS. Church History 2 IS. Christian Evidences 14. Missions 2 15. Hew Testament Introduction 1 16. Old Testament Introduction 1 17. Sunday School Teacher Training 20 18. teachings of Jesus 1 19. teachings of ^aul 1 SO. life of Jesus 1 21. Life of Paul 1 18 Required 36 1 10 5 1 5 1 2 6 10 fhuB it is seen that the colleges under investigation of¬ fer 18 eeursee for the religious education of those who cone under 16 thai? Wl^ervlslo® and prescribe 10 courses for the same purpose. : • ■:■•■ ■ . vs^b,% stditmir 1b enrolled in these curriculum courses? a guide for estimating effectiveness or vice versa but £& will serve us here for purpose?? of comparison. T*'e have noted the courses offered. It ir pertinent that w# should want to know how mnny a^re affected by these courses. Or perhaps it would be better to ask how many have the opportunity of partici¬ pating in the benefits derivable from these courses, and seise the opportunity. But even when we know that the total number of students in these various institutions should be evident in order that we might make a Just comparison between the number matricu¬ lated in these several colleges and vthe number influenced by the v<- courses of religious educetio*^. The numbers for each college may be seen in the Chart on the last page of this treatise# In the 38 private institutions for Uegroes of college rank# which come under our observation, there were enrolled for the scholastic year 1916-1917 1952 college students. The number# la the several colleges run from 558 to 6. It is interesting to ob¬ serve that over one-half of that number was registered in four universities as follows: Howard University 558; rilberforoe Uni¬ versity 202; Fisk University 208; and Lincoln University 163. The total is 1131♦ Of the remaining f @21 Uegro coil ege students IfTfc v,y-c^v<2 over fifty per centjwan& registered in eight other institutions as follows: Talladega College 66; Virginia Union University 66; More¬ house Coileg© 65; Benedict College 60; Bishop College 60; Atlan- ta University 59; Sh:p re priori concerning the prayer meeting were made. Torever it rap mo ted th?t the pchoclp -rhich had varied the fartherert from the traditions! prayer meeting had the roost good to ssy in behclf of the prayer meeting. In the great majority cf instance? the opinion is that the prry- er meeting is a bore and phould te absndcned. A student in one of the southern colleges, exprepsing vfhst he had reapons for be¬ lieving was the student's attitude tov^rdp prayer meeting?, raid "It isn't interesting and inn*t even a good sleeping place be¬ cause one cannot stretch out ss he derirep.n The general attitude towards the services on Sunday, then, is good. These services are beneficial. The ptudents feel thr.t they are mor&l end religious pupportn. And in ell case? they believe vrith plight rnodificationp they could be more effective. A greet premium ip pieced upon congregational Ringing and the liturgy in the services. '/Ls univereal as the national holiday? $he rre^k of prry- er for colleges has become in these institutional They affect the regurlr routine of Pchool rork in 22 colleges and universi¬ ties. This give? some ides of their estimate of the vrl uo of puch a Ferirs cf servicer. It is conducted variously. In Fome they conduct s series of prpyer md rong service? offering op- .--/L ifL i / portunity to those Fho h^ve-n-21 irsde & decision for the Letter life to do fo openly, ""heir names are recorded. And they be¬ come members of the college church, rrhere there in cne. Other- 31 t&ey are provided for through other means* Those who fail to make decisions are made epwcial objects of moral and religious endeavor during the following months. In other cases^18 col¬ leges , a religious survey is mede of the etudent body, usually through the Young L!enls Christian Association and the Young ^om¬ en1® Christian Association. This survey is made sometime]® prior t© the week of prayer and personal workers are selected to do campaign work which is to culminate in decisions during the week of prayer. The week of prayer service is conducted by the pres¬ ident, college pastor, or chaplain usually assisted by the mem¬ bers of the divinity school There there is one connected with the institution. Hine colleges have this convocation led by some strong min¬ ister from the community. Four surrender the whole affair to a professional evangelist. The students and officiary of these colleges report some very significant results and all of them are agreed in this?: the week of prayer is * very valuable harvester for gathering the fruits of previous endeavor, as well a? a decision promoter it¬ self. There is no unanimity of opinion relative to the beet way of conducting the week of prayer, except that the method will vary with conditions. Plight college pastors and cheplaine de¬ clare it injurious in the lonp run to have professional evangelists. The others except four 'did ft'-* knowvthey had never given the evan¬ gelist a test. They were fit lesst dubious about ranking the ex¬ periment. Some of the reaults rerortrd from the reek of prayer £-re a8 follows: For the scholastic year 1916-1917 three hundred and • ^ cL* twenty-two confessions for the bette"** life^. The most of /h\t 3) the Z ■ curriculum. fh© goal of general and religions education 1s the sane; namely, the getting of the individual into the highest and meet desirable relationship with both the hmsen and non-human elements, in his environment. The standard of each If found in the func¬ tional relationship of each to society. Modes of expression and emphasis may very hut the ideal? for both are the same. "Dr. Eas- 3 lett has given an unique feprepentation of this conception. " Heligious education is closely related to secular e due at icn and is largely dependent upon it. The fundaments! llawe sM principles ? of psychology and of education require to be recognized ap cen- 4 tral." Prefe«r#®r Coe reminds us, however, that religiona educa- 1. Ideals in Religious Education--}*. E. A. June 1917, p.M 2. Dewey: Ethical Principle? Underlying Education 3. Pedagogical 3ible School, page 207 4. E# E. A. April 19. 1917, page 122 BO ilii £* »@t and e&naet &e a mere application of any generalities W%kiefc til# university departments of education deal." "It is fcot & Mia*# paiH^milay that gets its meaning or finds itr test in the Bellgious education deal© with original data and wfWproblems that rarely appear in the instruction that in aalled * general' and that grow out of the specific nature of ©nr educational purpose. In the analysis of these data and in the determination of the method, we can and must use matter contained ft hzj^k in general eoursee of education. 3ut thet religious education^. b •f-ifiirt r\f «ti?*y is not exhausted the re * but is so specific and yet so fcroad as properly to constitute a recognized branch of ed¬ ucational practice, ^e religious purpose in religious education yield© the point of miew and the principles of elagnlfication that are iiapertfcnt fox religious ©dusters." fhe conceptions of religio w education just parsed; in re¬ view ism.Bt certain deductions. Any institution which meets ad¬ equately the re qui rements of religious education must h^ve genuine¬ ly religious men and wonten in the entire teaching and official force. Such persons will determine the atmosphere and spirit of the institution. These teachers should have clear conceptions of the ideals of religious education* The blind cannot lead the blind. The students must be trained along three fundamental liner., of the religious life. First, he must have some of the intellect¬ ual vlLlue of religion. He must hsve aociel knowledge. He must haye the opportunity of expresrin* u^c devotions! attitude in worship. He must have the outlet of religiouf energy in social service, -he duty of the college will be far from discharged un- 51 X#«i %t makes provision for laboratory religion where there is a wtrnflftng place for each member. Religion is a life ana the college afcoult he * society where this li\% my be lived in its fullest extent* #»eemraging practical altruism and giving #he protection which an ideal society affords ggainst demoralization. lm Evolution of Beligious Education in legre Colleges and Universities. The problem of religions? education in Hegro institutions is real* On the basis of the investigation we are able to point out some prominent phases of the problem. The first element of this problem is the teacher. There are ZZ te&chere of religious education in legro uoilegee who have had no professional training for the work. This means that one-fourth of the entire corp of teahcers of Religion in these institutions are without the prestige, at least, of even the semblance of pro¬ fessional training. Two main causes account for tlis. These in- stitutionst ^these who are professionally trained on their faculties and funds to procure the service of such persons. In the next pltce they winic it "ipa-'-t necessary. Sixty- four have had professional triAing varying from the lowest to the highest type. Thirty-one of these sixty-four have received their preparation et standard institutions in the IJorth Eest and rest. This guarantees academic preparation in a fairly commendable way. The other 33 were trained in the older insti¬ tutions of learning for Ilegroes, such as Howard University, Lin¬ coln University, Talladege College, "ilberforee University and Flsk University. Sut at these we find © large share of the men and women who wear® mentioned above as receiving their training 52 • f* 1 !"■< . - 1* Bbrthern. aad Western institutions. Therefore, we *ey say that three-fo or th 8 cf the teachers of religious education are profe88^B»lly trainefl uni one-fe urtli^MM^'laokin* in this respeet. ^ Jo ^^j/oint of Tiew-^^y'^fliat the teacher eoneeives the goal of religious education to be is qualified by Ms training. Jortfc- fiv© of these ins tractors are heirs of the "old line" theological fseiaimry where religion and salwtion were taught in terma of individualism; instead of the ideal of personal and social redemp- tion* nineteen enjoyed courses in scientific religious education. The majority of them have regained true to their seminary ideals. Out of sixty-four teachers only foux &ive their time to the teach¬ ing of religious education in these colleges, exclusively, Theft* four have Chairs of Bible. This means a handicap to the cause of V ligious education because it is in the most of our legr© col¬ leges an appendage of some other department and ae such gets on¬ ly an appendage's attention. There are some teachers in Hegro colleges who can direct the religious education effectively a nd who would do so were it not made impossible by the large space which other subjectr take on their programs. Thus in most Hegro institutions religious education is not efficiently conducted. Then we re; ch the voluntary courses bad matters are worse by far. Very little professional training shows itself here to the great disadvantage of those taking the courses. The majority of the courses in religious education h? ve been loosely selected, very little attention ie given to gradations? or the relation of one course to another. In too many instances the eonreee have just been stuck in that it might be said that they fca** stllgiotts #du«ation courses in the curricula. Examination . ray*- ,T, repealed that four Fegro institutions have arrangements of courses whicli migfet r#as©nabl* be called standardized ana which lead to &eflitlt# end?. The president?? of these other colliges fol* Negroes admitted in their answers to the questionnaire that reconstruction was necessary and desirable, The religious services seem to be very effective in the main. All evidence points to the Sunday school, preaching services, and Young Peoples' meetings as significant for the students? in the development of religious personalities. They seem to be signifi¬ cant in proportion to the participation in them by the students themselves# The Sunday schools and the Young Peoples' meetings are the most significant servicer for the students. They do the things which are significant for them. And after all that is the matter of vital concern. The services that are not made signifi¬ cant to the student himself are valueless in producing desired results* The prayer meetings are failure? if they are to be measuredl by the impressions which they make upon the studentr. And here again the pragmatic test must be applied. Te cannot thrust our religious experiences upon the student? from without. Tftey mast achieve their ova religious experience in contact with the environ¬ ment in which they live. The pray** meetings in alle xcept four institutions follow a program which wae effective for these who lived in another civilization. The traditional Ilegro prayer meet- etndent. "Tiere modifications r re made such &s those afeaemention- ** batter results are obtainable. Physiologically at lesst the function religiously in the life of the ITegro college 54 praywr Metlag semdBg at the end of a long study period functions i'ila'Mt .tte3»atie» «f morphine, It is conducive to blumber and the iir uMeslral)!©. of prayer for colleger? is proving to be a very sue- eessful religious asset, especially where work along personal lineB has been going on systematically prior to the observance. It elicits tfcie co-operative spirit from the students in a fashion which is beneficial to the religious life of the students. ^he chapel services In raany of the institution!? have their objectionable f#aturei?f but on the whole, they are wholepome and unifying to a large extent. fo on© connected with legro colleges? has been able to demon¬ strate either through theory or practice the religious value of the "quiet hour" fer girlr on Sunday afternoons, while at the same hour the boys* ere out having a good time. It is one of the re lie* which might well be dispensed wita. One of the big problem# of religious education is compulsion In regard to religious? services. -There should that stop. ?*any are beginning t© think that the religious* velue of the services is often nullified by the compulsory attendance. There are many conscientious objector* among the students who think the remove! of compulsion would be conducive to better religious development, lut the likelihood of pome swinging from one extreme to the other 1b very great. It is f*till a problem left for the religious ed¬ ucators in the college?? to solve. The solution muet result in the conservation of the good found in the compulsory eyetem end the good to be founa in freedom of choice. i?;a JjL KxpweaiGBal activities are increasing in Hegro colleges b«t witb few •gocytions these are inadequate in schpge and number. It t$. ttwi. tffat enough students are able to share in the so¬ cial mvp.*t# frojeots* This is really one of, if not the most 3^fjrtpnt factors in religious education* Ken gain religious pow- •r a.®tins °ut their beliefs, allowing their convictions to flow out i A - -• in Hegro colleges. Frequently we find several organizations attempt- - img to do the same thing and each aakes a miserable failure in the attempt* More than that, this lack of co-ordination and correla¬ tion results in duplications which surely mans wasted energy and boh-effectiveness* If all of the religious agencies were super¬ vised in such a way that m ch would know Mb specific task and would net overlap that of other agencies, mueh more effective work would he the result* Squally or more unfortunate is the deficiency in reeorde re¬ lative to religious education in Hegro colleges. There has been no adequate attempt by any Hegro institution to keep reliable re- c.A /vwrV cords of all phases of religious education. Of course this iiH4. confined to legro colleges, but nevertheless it is a ft gn of in¬ efficiency. The most of these organizations in the colleges and universities cannot give records showing whether they are making progress or sliding down the hill. They have very little by which they rosy cheek present results. These records themselvep aight be used as religious agencies. The fin&fccing of religious education in Kegro colleges end uaiversities is exceedingly pocr. But I doubt if we should be sur~ 56 that might go fancier **&& #&y th« financing fi^^ltlifmtlitf * lH Wegro colleges with three exceptions is? poor, and in" b©case■ 10"'it adequate to present ieupm&f?. '* ift# appropriation of funds for religious e dacetion hae been IllfW thai! that for several other purposes. The need of funds for this work, has not been impressed upon these who appropriate the fund® in mqbt c&®e?> . fteds are mot available in laany fhis lack has handicapped the whole religious education process* Without adequate seans adequate teachers and coutb&s c®n~ not b® h&d^^tequatc' expression In thwarted. £a denominational Bcheola which have always had th® religious motive prominent, the funds are ©till lacking. fhe idea of reli¬ gious education-hel# by the® ie often responsible for lack of funde, » fhey must be converted to the idea that religious education is more than beginning at Genesis and going to tevelation. Whm they re$eh that conception more funds will be available for the pre®#- out!on of the work of religious e dueation, The state colleges whdeh were considered in our study eoae up to the average denominational allege in religious services end expreesicna1 activities. But they can through their extension department affect the lives of thousands in the rural section®. This opportunity for social service ie unlimited. tfhere are eigne of hope in the religious education of theee legro colleger. 3*he almost unanimous recognition of the religions motive in efficient education by the educators and the ranifeet «©mseicttene«?s of nefcde of better religious education have been Outlook for Improvement 57 mentioned. There are others. An increasing number of treinod teachers from the Northern, Eastern, and ^estern colleges end uni¬ versities is evident. These men and women are coming from the in¬ stitutions? where the points of xjiew end training represented in the previous chapter are found. The summer schools of the various colleges and universities in the northt Hast and Test are offering many of these modem re¬ ligious educe,tion courses and larger numbers of the teachers' of religious education are av&lling themselver of the opportunityes. Kuch literature of religious education published recently is finding its rey to these schorls* the most notable of rhich is the Beligious Education Magazine. The teachers in the TTegro colleges? have, for the most part, the religious motive, ^Mch they hrve met in these colleger and universities from the very beginning of their tenure of office. There privyte rnfi denominational schools came into existence as a result of religious convictions put into practive. AITE1JDIX -Allen University ^ tlcnta University Arl&nsas Baptist College Middle University Benedict College Bishop w lane « Claflin University Clark " €onroe College T!award Waters College Fisk University Howard University Hartshorn College ^noxville Lincoln University Livingstone College Morehoupe n Morgan n Morris Brown College lew Orleans University Paine College Texas n Podger Williams University Bust College °triight College Samuel Houston College flhaw University Shorter College I ."tate University ./Swift Memorial College —Talladega College —^illotson / Tougaloo University Virginia Union University —-^ilberforce University iSpelman Seminary la. Theological Seminary t College H~Florida b. and IT. College . Georgia Htate College /Agricultural & Mechanical College Agricultural S Technical Col., of 3. C. ^-Alcorn A. and K. College Klest Va« Collegiate Institute 0 -I / f , 0_ 3 ZQ 30 3 59 12 50 1-4 16 16 15 2 1-4 40 40 20 1 60 40 22 *> A/ 60 40 20 1 17 10 12 1 20 20 14 3 1-2 21 7 14 2 14 10 12 1 52 15 2 208 110 90 . 4 §58 * 98 60 6- 10 4 5 2 33 33 30 4 1-2 163 163 100 4 1-2 37 27 30 3 65 34 40 1 3-4 46 46 46 1 1-2 21 21 19 3 30 30 26 2 11 6 11 2 9 9 8 4 14 14 14 2 1-2 12 10 12 2 1-4 36 0 -29 0 35 13 29 2 49 20 40 1 1-2 25 25 20 2 1-2 13 7 10 2 9 5 9 1 1-4 66 25 60 4 34 19 11 3 16 9 11 2 1-4 66 51 30 4 1-2 202 60 150 4 1-4 6 6 6 2 1-2 27 21 20 3 36 15 20 00 29 15 17 0 20 15 11 0 35 11 20 0 152 40 : 115 0 33 25 20 0 fl J- H 3 /< H 1 f <« fl f' M ^ /CAoJU^T fa**-*