S
<<
SSS
=e S =
Pe 2)
ee
a Pee
———
AY
WA
WY
\
|
OTT
My ;
eka ci 7a :
\ i
, ‘A
Kant um
fren a Photograph by Samuel A, Walker, 230, Regent Street, W,
NOTES AND JOTTINGS
FROM
mri MAL Lil &
BY THE LATE
FRANK BUCKLAND, M.A.
H.M. INSPECTOR OF FISHERIES
AUTHOR OF ‘CURIOSITIES OF NATURAL HISTORY’ ETC. EYIc.
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
$
LONDON
SMITH, ELDER, & CO., 15 WATERLOO PLACE
1882
[All righis reserved]
ae
y *
~
i
. 3
“ a :
Pe 5 ‘
~ *
‘ :
. -
* >
f : % ~
* af a
‘ 2. . {i
at ak
a . 4 be ’
ae - >a -
™ ‘ ws 4
’ ‘ = as) . “ ~
~Y 4
a - of * ys
a | see , -
- e re *
jeday t abede| aU Om abe
—~ O——
THESE PAPERS were selected and arranged by FRANK
BUCKLAND, shortly before his death, with a view to
their early publication. The substance of them had
appeared in ‘Land and Water,’ whence the illustra-
tions (except that of Jemmy the Suricate and the last
sketch of the whale) are, by permission, reproduced.
Jemmy’s portrait is inserted, by permission, from the
‘Leisure Hour.’ The articles will recall to many the
vivid and original. power of observation and illustration,
and the earnest love of nature, with whieh their author
was gifted.
Some papers remain for future publication.
G. C. BOMPAS.
LONDON: April 1882.
CONTENTS.
est sid sh Sl
PAGE
CHRISTMAS DAY WITH MY MONKEYS : ; : ; ]
Mr. PONGO, THE GORILLA : : tPA aes ri
JOE THE CHIMPANZEE : : : ‘ : . +14
THE RAT, AND JUDY THE MARMOSET : ] Aa) chpeilte Sy |
My SURICATE JEMMY THE THIRD, JOE THE TAME HARE,
AND MY JACKASS . é , ‘ : ere ed
CARLISLE CATTLE MARKET . : ; : : py:
AN ELEPHANT IN ALBANY STREET. ; : ey Fea oS,
SALMON EGG COLLECTING FOR AUSTRALIA : : ee:
SALMON EGG COLLECTING FOR NEW ZEALAND ; ee tee 3 GOO
JOHN HUNTER’S CHAIR—EAT AND BE EATEN . ; aro
TALKING-FISH, EYES OF MuUMMy, ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU. 91
My TAME OTTERS . : : A : BRS
My OTTER TOMMY : ; : : : Pee AE
THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND PoOR MAN'S MARKET ‘ ge Lae
RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD : ee LED
‘ CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS 2 ; F . 128
PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES .. 135
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL’ . = : 2 well
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. : : ; , eas
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH . ; : g : 184
Vill CONTENTS.
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS
SIR WALTER SCOTT’S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD
SALE OF MANDERS’ MENAGERIE ; : '
PLAYGROUND FOR THE LIONS AND TIGERS AT THE ZOOLOGICAL
GARDENS
TIGER FIGHT AT THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS
POLAR BEAR CUBS
DESCENT OF THE LION FROM ‘NoRTHUMBERLAND HOUSE
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS
REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK.
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES
THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL
UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR, AT THE SOUTHPORT AQUARIUM .
THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY
THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON
THE MANATEE
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT .
-
a
——-
. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
FIGURE
xi
2.
0 DH NH
13.
14.
15.
16.
pen Be eS
PORTRAIT OF FRANK BUCKLAND : eee Frontispiece
JEMMY THE SURICATE ae : . +. To face page 24
ACCIDENT TO A STAG IN WINDSOR PARK Page 291
FORE-LEG OF THE STAG CAUGHT BY FORKED
BRANCHES OF A THORN TREE » 293
. SEA-BEAR AT THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS. oe aUD
SEA-LIONS AT THE BRIGHTON AQUARIUM 4 BOG
THE WALRUS. One
. POSITION OF WHALEBONE WITH. MOUTH OPEN BLO
POSITION OF WHALEBONE WITH MOUTH SHUT Ap gs Sve
. SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH SHUT Be Bs 4 he
SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH OPEN ole
WHALEBONE WHALE OF THE GREENLAND SEAS AE
. (A) ‘RIDGE OF FINS’ AS SEEN BY THE OFFICERS OF
H.M. YACHT ‘OSBORNE’ Ae ate:
(B) ANIMAL SEEN THROUGH A TELESCOPE, IN THE
OF SWIMMING AWAY ROE
SEA-SERPENT AS SEEN IN THE HIGHLAND LOCH IN
1872 : : ee 402
BASKING SHARK WITH FINS PROJECTING ABOVE THE
WATER » 406
GREENLAND WHALE SWIMMING AWAY. 410
NOTES AND JOTTINGS
FROM
ANIMAL LIFE.
CHRISTMAS DAY WITH MY MONKEYS.
LITTLE Jack began the row ; I know he did, because I saw
him do it.
But who is Little Jack, and what was the row about ?
It was Christmas Day, a very cold Christmas Day, so I
made a good fire, and let out the monkeys for a run.
My family at that time consisted of four monkeys:
Little Jack, Tiny, Carroty Jane, and Jenny.
In the ‘ Monkey Room,’ as the servants call my studio,
lived also the rat, Judy the marmoset, Joe the tame hare,
Jemmy the suricate, the laughing jackass, and the old
grey parrot.
Little Jack is the fun of the whole cage, and at the
same time he is the plague and torment. of the inhabitants
thereof. When I bought him I was told he would grow
into a big monkey, instead of which he has grown into a
little monkey.
the most part generals, statesmen, lawyers, &c., and we
all admire them for the benefits they have conferred upon
human civilisation; but to the sick man writhing in
agony from the fierce sting of a cruel and remorseless
disease, who is the great man? To whom does he look
for human assistance but to the man of science; the
student of Nature who has deeply investigated the laws
of health and disease, and has arranged and practically
applied them to the alleviation of human misery and
suffering? John Hunter therefore as the founder of the
system of modern surgery, and the discoverer of many of
Nature’s sanitary laws, may be justly regarded as one of
the greatest benefactors to the human race. The dis-
coveries of Hunter were not made in a moment; the
conclusions he came to were not arrived at without vast
labour of both mind and body. Nature is jealous of her
seerets—nay, very jealous ; always a witness to the truth,
she gives her evidence only under very severe cross-
questioning and cross-examination. In his investigation
of disease therefore John Hunter was not unfrequently
foiled, and could obtain no answer from the subject
before him; it was then his custom to call another
witness, and if he could not get at his fact directly, he
would indirectly. The human stomach, the great cook-
shop of the human system, refused in many instances to
inform the enquirer how she prepared the flesh of animals,
the leaves of vegetables, and the products of the mineral
kingdom, and formed therefrom dishes and entrées which
should be palatable to the absorbent and form good blood,
invigorating the mental powers and building up anew the
body of man, whose construction is, as the Psalmist says,
JOHN HUNTER’S CHAIR, 85
so fearful and wonderful. Hunter therefore was in the
habit of getting at the secrets of the chef de cuisine by
calling at the minor cooking restaurants, asking a question
here and a question there. He enquired of the cow why
she had a double stomach—a front kitchen and a back
kitchen ; of the camel, why he carried a system of watere
works whose supply was at command at any moment
within his gigantic thistle digester. He asked the horse
why he had such a small stomach and such large in-
testines; the sheep, why such a large stomach and such
small intestines. He saw in the gizzard and crop of the
bird a machine which performed not only the duties of
digestion, but also of a crusher and mincemeat maker.
The entrails of fish (to others an abomination) became to
him samples of another mode of Nature’s operations ; and
thus he went down and down in the links of created beings
till at last the lowest link of all was before him. And of
what did that consist? A stomach, a simple stomach—a
stomach unprovided with eyes, arms, legs, or brain, but
yet—oh! strange to say—having the power which other
stomachs higher in the system have not—namely, the
power of knowing and choosing what is good or bad for
their digestion.
In his investigations into the functions of digestion
and other functions of the animal kingdom, Hunter
collected a vast museum, an assemblage of bottled facts,
which no human philosophy can deny, no ideal metaphy-
sicians clispute or question.
By his will, John Hunter directed this museum to be
offered in the first instance to the British Government,
and in the year 1799 Parliament voted the sum of 15,0001.
86 JOHN HUNTER’S CHAIR.
for the purchase, and an offer being made of the museum
to the Corporation of Surgeons, it was accepted on the terms — 3
proposed by the Government. An admirable synopsis of
the contents can be obtained of the porter at the college,
price sixpence; we learn from this that there were in
1875 40,701 specimens. Great facilities are given by
the council of the college to visitors who wish to study.
Since Hunter’s death, to the great credit of the nation
and its rulers, this magnificent collection has been kept
up, added to, and fostered under the care of Mr. Clift,
my friend Professor Owen, the late lamented Professor
Quekett, and the present able and industrious curator,
Professor Flower. From the utmost parts of the world,
habited and uninhabited, come monthly and yearly, as
if by intuitive instinct, all that is rare curious and in-
structive in the animal kingdom, each to add its quota
of information towards the elucidation of what Nature
does in her private laboratories.
Passing into this glorious museum, we ask ourselves
upon what order and plan are all these miscellaneous
objects arranged. On entering, we find immediately upon
our left specimens of the tissues and skeletons of plants,
upon our right specimens of dried humanity—mummies
from the catacombs of Egypt, from London churchyards,
and from the museums of ancient quack doctors. Between
these two limits are galleries full to plenitude of all
intermediate forms of animal life, some miles of glass
preparation bottles, and some acres of dried specimens.
Examining these as we walk along, the idea strikes us to
ask ourselves what general law governed all these various
creatures when in life ?—-why were they created, and why
EAT AND BE EATEN. 87
did they live? The answer is simple and easy. The
great law of nature, to which all living things must
submit, is, ‘Eat and be eaten ;’
and in conformity with
this law are all animal machines contrived and made to
work. The plant eats decayed vegetable and animal
substances; the herbivorous animals eat the plants; the
carnivorous eat the herbivorous; man, as lord of all, lays
his claim of power upon all and over all.
We therefore find that all animals may be well called
eating machines. Looking at them as simple machines,
we find the ultimate object of their structure is to procure
food, and so admirable is this structure that every part
of the body is in harmony with its neighbour, so much so
that one single bone will tell the comparative anatomist —
what the rest of the body must have been like; what its
food must have therefore been, and thence what the ex-
ternal conditions necessary for its well-being in life; and
these rules become of the greatest importance to the
researches of the geologist, who by the application of
these laws is frequently enabled from a single fossil bone
to draw a picture of animal life as it mwst have existed
in the times long past when this earth was yet. in its
infancy.
We place the skull of a deer and of a tiger side by
side, and compare them. The teeth are the objects that
first strike us as presenting the most marked differences.
In the deer we have the front teeth made for nipping
grass, boughs of trees, &c., and the hind teeth beautifully
constructed for the comminution of the same. Not so in
the tiger; here the teeth are mightily different. The
great canines grin savagely at us; they are bayonets,
88 EAT AND BE EATEN.
daggers, and Hesh-hooks combined ; sharp are their points,
cutting their edges. We open the gaping jaws, we find
the back teeth set like scissors, so as to bite up crude
masses of blood-stained flesh. The deer is an herbivorous
animal, the tiger a carnivorous. The teeth of the deer
would be useless to the queen of the jungle. The fangs
of the tiger placed in the mouth of the deer would cause
its death by starvation. We now walk to the cabinet
where the skeletons are arranged. We see here the
skeleton of the deer made with the utmost lightness
consistent with strength; we find that it is constructed
for swiftness in flight and bird-like speed. The bones of
the tiger are, on the contrary, like bars of iron, solid,
massive, firm in their structure. The horn-covered toes
are no longer suited for flight, but in the form of claws
are elongated into curved, sharp-pointed hooks, not fitted
for continuous running, but rather for seizing and holding
a living prey. Yet observe the pad at the sole of the
foot—how noiselessly, how quietly do these cushions of
natural velvet carry the destroyer within reach of the
destroyed! How marvellous is the elasticity of this
mighty framework of gigantic osseous strength !
We next go to the gallery where various forms of eyes
are displayed. What a difference do we behold! The
beautiful dark-coloured open eye of the timid deer enables
it to see its enemy from afar, and to ramble in midday
in search of luxuriant pastures. The eye of the tiger is
that of-a nocturnal animal. It has a most wonderful
mechanism for making the best use of the scanty rays
of light from the moon or from the rising or setting sun.
It is fierce, cruel in its aspect. Pity it knows not; once
EAT AND BE EATEN. 89
fixed on its prey it is deadly and glaring till its appetite
is satisfied with fresh blood. Let us now examine the
stomachs of these two animals. That of the deer is
formed in a complex manner for the digestion of vegetables.
It is a natural hayloft, so formed that there shall be a
receptacle, a meal-bag, for containing the collected food
when the animal is at pasture. Besides the bag, we find
a true digesting stomach, which shall be called into
operation when the owner is in safety and able to eat its
dinner in peace and quiet. The stomach of the tiger, on
the contrary, is a simple bag, a mere receptacle and
digester of the flesh it devours. The cook who presides
over it is a ‘plain cook,’ serving up ‘simple joints.’ The
deer’s stomach has a complicated larder and a grand array
of stew-pans, over which a ‘professed cook’ presides,
sending up the crude food, not sufficiently comminuted
by the teeth, back again into the mouth to receive an
extra mincing by the process which is called ‘ chewing
the cud.’
Thus then we see that these two animals are broad
examples of structure being always in conformity with the
food of the animal. The business of the deer is to eat
herbs; his whole anatomy is constructed in conformity
to this end; his limbs enable him to seek his food, his
teeth to procure it, his stomach to digest it. So with
the tiger, his teeth are carnivorous, his claws carnivorous,
his stomach carnivorous.
Throughout the whole series of the animal kingdom
we find this law prevailing. Watch a dog, a cat, an
elephant, a flea; what seems to be the one idea in these
creatures’ heads? To eat, to sleep, and to eat again.
90 . EAT AND BE EATEN.
The dog is most friendly to his master, and shows him the
greatest attention, when dinner is on the table; the cat
is most lively and most complacent when she hears the
well-known tread of the cat’s-meat man in the street, and
at the words ‘ Méét, méét,’ carries her tail erect and in a
true cat-like manner... The elephant is a terrible mendi-
cant, always supplicating alms with outstretched trunk.
The flea takes his supper of human blood when the sleeper
retires for the night, and rouses him again at early morn
when his insect stomach craves for breakfast. All these
creatures are constructed with the object they have
principally in view. The trunk of the elephant tears
down the luxuriant vegetation of the jungle; the trunk
(or piercer) of the flea sips its food from the skin of the
most savoury mortal it can discover in a day’s hopping, be
he lord or serf. |
Over John Hunter’s grave in the north aisle of West-
minster Abbey, close to the stone bearing the inscription
‘O Rare Ben Jonson,’ is the following inscription deeply o> :
cut in brass :—‘ The Royal College of Surgeons of Eng-
land have placed this tablet over the grave of John —
Hunter to record their admiration of his genius as the
gifted interpreter of the Divine Power and Wisdom at
work in the laws of organic life, and their grateful venera-
tion for his services to mankind as the founder of scientific
surgery.’
91
TALKING-FISH, EYES OF MUMMY, ANTIQUITIES
FROM PERU.
WHEN staying at the Elephant Hotel at Newtown in Wales,
in May 1875, Mr. Charles Thomas, of Newtown, was good
enough to call upon me in order to show me what he
called his ‘talking-fish.’ I candidly confess that his
curiosity was entirely new to me. On opening the box
which contained this treasure, Mr. Thomas produced a
double jug. Each jug is somewhat of the shape of an or-
dinary toilet water-bottle; the two jugs are united at the
base by a junction very like that which united the Siamese
Twins, and the bottles are again united by a kind of handle
that passes between them at the top. The top of one of
the bottles is plain, the top of the other is rudely fashioned
to represent the head of a seal. Mr. Thomas poured
water into the bottle which has the open mouth, and
gently turned the water in the bottles from side to side;
he then stood them on the table, and from the seal’s
mouth immediately proceeded a cry amazingly like that
of a seal. It sounded something like this: ‘Ma-maar-
mamaar-mam-a-ma-a-a-a-r.’ The same effect was produced
by emptying the water out and simply blowing into the
bottle. I have no idea how this sound is produced, neither
92 EYES OF MUMMY.
has Mr. Thomas. Of course there must be some kind of
whistle in one of the bottles, but where it is and how it
works we cannot tell, nothing being visible from the
outside.
Seeing I was interested by his talking-fish, Mr. Thomas
said he thought he could puzzle me again with another
curiosity in the ‘Powis Land Museum,’ at Welshpool.
Mr. Thomas was quite right, for he did puzzle me again.
He showed me there some very remarkable thimbie-shaped
bodies, which would be well represented if the top of one’s
little finger were cut off at the root of the nail, and stood
on the table. These remarkable objects were, he said,
the eyes of mummves, and were found in the shrunken
skin of the eyes of dried mummies of the ancient Peruvians
at Areca; when the mummies were handled, these ob-
jects were found loose in the cavity of the eye. They are
conical in shape, with a flattened base; they are of a dark
amber colour, and, in fact, very like amber. On holding
them up to the sun the light is concentrated as by a lens,
so that a brilliant spot, like a speck of flame, appears just
where the centre of the eye would come ina human being.
When inserted in the mummy these eyes must have a
ghastly effect. The section shown naturally at the base
presented a laminated appearance, like an onion; and a
small portion when burnt showed that they were decidedly
formed of some animal matter. The structure was very
like that of the crystalline lens of the human eye, which
when hardened in alcohol splits into three segments, each
of which is again separated into layers, leaving a central
nucleus.
ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU. 93
Notwithstanding the structure of these dried substances
found in the eyes of Peruvian mummies so much re-
sembled that of the lens of the human eye, I was inclined to
think that they were really the bisected lenses of some fish.
By subsequent investigation I ascertained beyond doubt
that these curious objects are the lenses from the eyes
of cuttle-fish. Collectors of Peruvian antiquities, please
examine your collections. 7
Mr. Thomas has resided for upwards of the last twenty-
five years in Peru, both in the interior and on the coast.
He has travelled: and explored a great deal, and has
brought home with him a large collection of prehistoric
pottery, which is now in the Powis Land Museum at Welsh-
pool. I know nothing about pottery, but I should think ©
there are some rare treasures in this collection. The
shapes of the vases and jugs are most artistic and elegant ;
they are made of clay or earthenware, and are very light.
Nearly all are in some way connected with animals ; some
are in the actual shape of animals; others have figures of
animals worked into their substance, such as parrots, mon-
keys, lizards, toads, fish, pelicans, &c.
Mr. Thomas also showed me a leather-cutting knife
(modern, of course). The handle of it is hollow and inlaid
with beautiful filigree work. In the hollow are placed
little portions of metal, which tinkle as the knife is moved.
The object of this is, I am told, that the master may know
whether the workman is going on using his knife, or
whether he has laid it down in idleness. In Mr. Thomas’s
collection are also some very remarkable wooden staves,
carved with grotesque figures. They look like staves of
Dts ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU, is:
islands to the south of Truxillo, on the coast a ie 4
Altogether, Mr. Thomas’s collection is most interesting. a
The Powis Land Museum also contains a fine collec- 4
tion of local antiquities and works of art. re
“a
7 as, 4
oe
95
MY TAME OTTERS.
Mr. Matrutas Dunn, of Mevagissey, Cornwall, informed
me, in February 1873, that there were two young otters
for sale, which had been caught by fishermen on the
Cornish coast, while rowing along the sea-shore in a small
boat, going to their crab-grounds. When off a high
cliff the men saw two young otters taking their morning
bath in a quiet inlet; the otters instantly made for the
shore, and quickly hid themselves under a jutting rock.
One of the men landed, got hold of them and brought
them into the boat, and tied them fast with a strong
cord. When these youngsters found their liberty gone,
they set up a very shrill noise, whistling would hardly
express the name of the sound. The men were about
to resume their work, when, more than 150 yards away
along the coast, they saw the dam making directly for
them, and lay on their oars to notice the effects of the
screams of the young on the parent otter, expecting the
mother to show the white feather. She swam, however,
boldly up to the boat, and tried to climb into it, but its
height out of the water prevented her from doing so.
Three times the otter made the attempt to mount the
sides of the boat, and each time failed.
The affectionate and plucky mother was eventually
killed, and her two young ones brought ashore. As soon
9G MY TAME OTTERS.
as I heard of their capture, I determined to secure the
pretty creatures for the Brighton Aquarium.
The two poor motherless baby otters arrived at Albany
Street about twelve o’clock on a very cold day, the parcels _
delivery man having kindly carried them about London ~
for nearly three hours. They were in a large hamper,
with some straw. I found the little things curled up like
the « babes in the wood,’ and their pretty little bright eyes
looked up at me imploringly, as much as to say, ‘ Please
do not hurt us; we are dreadfully frightened, hungry
and sleepy, and we have lost our mother.’ Knowing that
otters cannot do long without water, I put into their basket a
basin of water, and they drank greedily of it. I then sent —
for some sprats, and was delighted to find that they would
take them out of my hand. Altogether they ate nearly
half a pound of sprats between them. Not willing to trust
anybody to take my prizes to Brighton, I determined to
see them safely thither myself. A four-wheel cab not being
available at the moment, I put them in their basket
between the doors of a hansom. On arriving at Victoria
station, after taking my ticket, I looked at the otters to
see how they were getting on. I was horrified to find one
lying on his back, apparently dead, while the other looked
by mo means so fresh as I could have wished. I had a bit
of a shindy with the porter, who wanted to put my basket
in the guard’s van. If this had been done both the otters
would probably have perished between London and
Brighton. I therefore appealed to his humanity, showed
him the poor little otters, and asked him where I could
find a fire. He then kindly showed me into the waiting-
room, and lighted the burners of the gas stove. I put the
basket with the otters on the top of the stove, and
MY TAME OTTERS. 97
turned up the gas as high as I dared without burning the
animals: still the poor sick otter did not move, but the
other one got better. I then sent the man to explain
the circumstances to the superintendent, and get his leave
to take the basket with me into a first-class carriage.
Just as the train was starting, a man came by with
foot-warmers. I procured one, and placed the otters in
their basket upon it. Seeing that the man had another
warmer to spare, I took that also into the carriage, and,
opening the lid of the basket, carefully slid it down between
the two little animals. I then left them alone. When
we got to Croydon I examined them again, and was much
pleased to find that the healthier of the two was lying full
length half asleep on the foot-warmer, while the other one
opened his eyes, of which I was glad, for I really had thought
he was dead. One ate some sprats, which I carried in my
pocket, but the sickly one would not look at them. Feel-
ing sure he wanted more warmth still, I considered what I
should do for a wrap for him. Having no rug or great-
coat, I was for the moment puzzled what to do. After
thinking for a minute I recollected I had got on my seal-
skin waistcoat, so at once took it off and covered him over
with it. Both the poor little animals then went fast
asleep, and I determined not to disturb them any more
till I arrived at the Aquarium.
Mr. Lawler met me at the station at Brighton, and we
jumped into the cab without looking at the otters.
A few minutes after we left the station I felt some-
thing nip my leg, and looking down into the basket, I
found that it was empty. Both otters were loose in the
cab. My foot-warmers had, in fact, been so effectual that
H
he MY TAME OTTERS.
I had made them too lively. I told Lawler to keep per-
fectly quiet and do nothing, and even if he was bitten not
to move his legs. The otters soon came out from under
the seat and looked impudently at us. I did not care what
they did, I was so pleased to find they were alive. When
we arrived at the back entrance of the Aquarium
I asked for a small landing net, and then passed the
cushions of the cab out of the window to the man, who
seemed somewhat astonished at my proceedings. I
intended to catch them with the landing net; so I shut
up the windows, and prepared for an otter-fight in the cab.
I had not long to wait before I saw the tail of one of the
otters projecting from under the seat. MRecollecting that
pictures of otter-hunting sometimes represented the hunts-
man as ‘tailing the otter,’ I thought I would try if I could
accomplish the feat. So, watching my opportunity, I
caught the otter by the tail, gave him a twist, and dropped
him into the basket like a shot. He snapped and snarled
dreadfully, and tried to turn round to bite me, but I was
too quick for him, and the lid of the basket was down in a
moment. The other otter then climbed up on to the seat of
the cab, and seemed to be looking for his comrade. I
opened the lid of the basket, and he seemed inclined to
go in. While he was making up his mind, I opened
the lid with one hand, and gave him a push with
the other, and in he tumbled; so I had got the two all
right. When inside the Aquarium I gave them some
more sprats and another drink of water. We then shut
them up in their basket, and put them by the engine
furnace, where I left them as jolly as otters could be,
though I regret to say the poor little fellows did not live
very long after this.
99
MY OTTER TOMMY.
On Friday, April 2, 1875, when returning from a
salmon inspection at Cardigan, I halted for a minute to
take the temperature of the water of the Teify, as it
passes under the bridge at Llechrhyd. A coracle fisher-
man came running up to me to ask if I would like to buy
an otter. We were much pressed for time, so I had only
just a minute to run into the cottage garden and examine
him. He was loose in a pigsty, and as handsome a
little beast as ever I saw. The fisherman, when lying.
in ambush for wild ducks, between Llechrhyd and Cenarth
Falls, in January, saw something just at the dawn of day
swimming past him in the water; he caught it by the
tail, and it turned out to be a little baby-otter. Though
a baby, the otter fought and bit tremendously ; but the
fisherman firmly secured him by putting him inside the
sleeve of his jacket. Hearing the proposed destiny of the
otter was to be hunted, I at once bought him, and directed
him to be packed up quite warm and sent to Albany
Street. During the next day, when all was quiet, I had a
grand opportunity of watching him. At first he was very
savage, and bit fiercely at everything. I gave him as
many fish as he could eat, and he then began to get
H 2
100 MY OTTER TOMMY.
tame, so tame in fact that he would allow me to stroke
his head with a pencil. I then took the otter down
to my Fish Museum at South Kensington, and, for
want of a better place, was obliged to put him into an
aquarium, and I am afraid it did him no good, as the
next morning he was found to have suffered much from the
cold. Being in want of a cage, I searched for something
that would do and was fortunate enough to discover an old
wooden pedestal which had been used at the exhibition
of 1872 as a stand for a statue: turning it over right on
its side, I found it to be hollow, and by nailing wire
and boards across the bottom I made a capital big
cage. | |
When in the aquarium, as it was getting dark, the
otter began to whistle in a most beautiful way. At first I
thought it was the note of some bird—something like the
robin. The whistle was repeated several times sharply,
and then followed by a musical kind of rattle. I have no
idea of the mechanism of the whistle of the otter; prairie-
dogs and marmots also whistle. I believe it is not under-
stood how they manage to do it. Lieutenant Juel,
commanding officer of a Norwegian man-of-war, who had
come to consult me about the fisheries of his country,
told me that otter-shooting was a favourite sport in
Norway. They either tracked them in the snow, or else
called them by imitating the otter’s own whistle. |
Tommy, as the otter was christened, lived in his cage
along time, and became a great attraction to visitors. He
soon learnt to answer to his name, and if a stone were
thrown into his tub of water he would dive for and
gambol with it in a kitten-like manner. During the
MY OTTER TOMMY. 101
summer of 1878 the attendant Edon informed me that
Tommy used to come out of his house, especially on
moonlight nights, and play about on the roof of his cage ;
but, as far as we know, he never then went far away.
We should never have known this had not a policeman
seen him on the top of his cage. We could not con-
ceive how he got out; but it was afterwards discovered
that Master Tommy had scratched a hole under-
neath the straw of his bed, through which he used to
squeeze his india-rubber-like body and crawl up the
interspace between the cage and the wall; but at day-
light he used to go back again by the same road into
his cage.
One morning in the following winter a mysterious
circumstance took place. The padlock which fastened
the wirework of the cage was missing, and Tommy
was gone. The question was, whither? As my badger
got loose and was seen in the drains in Kensington
Gardens (where for aught I know he is still alive and
well, and I hope he is so), I expected to hear of a wonder-
ful discovery of a live otter in the Serpentine. In order
to induce Tommy not to go to the Serpentine, I ordered
the lad Joe, the assistant, to put Tommy’s food as usual
in his house, so that he might not suffer from
hunger.
For several days we knew he was not far away, because
he ate his food, and we could see his tracks in the snow.
One night, as Joe was hunting the bushes about with a
lantern, Tommy followed the light, and Joe and the
policeman on duty managed to circumvent the foolish
little rascal, and drive him into his cage. He was dread-
102 MY OTTER TOMMY.
fully thin and scared, and seemed only too glad to get
back to his comfortable home. I had previously borrowed © |
a cat-trap from Mr. Bartlett, but Tommy was much too
artful to go into it.
With care and plenty of food the otter soon recovered.
Mr. Edon found he could imitate his whistle exactly by
sharply twisting the glass stopper of a bottle in its socket.
I suppose that my Museum must be a ghostly-looking
place in the middle of the night. An Irishman who
was put on as policeman, was terribly frightened one
night. When going his rounds, as he was flashing
his bull’s-eye about, suddenly from the side of the stove
there appeared two eyes of fire, glaring with demoniacal
fierceness at the Bobby. Poor Bobby trembled, groaned,
and quickly retreated backwards from the supposed ghost ;
in doing so, he fell down three steps on to his back, which
added much to his previous alarm. It turned out that
the demoniacal eyes were simply the glass eyes of my
big Scotch fox, which Edon had stuffed in a curled-up
attitude. The light from the bull’s-eye lantern happened
to hit the glass eyes just at the right angle. The stuffed
fox was afterwards placed upon the straw on which the
cast of the elephant rests. Edon put a chain round his
neck, and it is often amusing to hear visitors argue whether
the animal is really dead or alive. |
In April 1879 my friend Mr. Charles Hambro wrote
to say that his keeper had captured an otter near his
residence, Milford Abbey, Blandford, Dorset, and that the
animal was so little injured that he thought it would do
well in captivity. It had been taken by a steel trap, but
so ligntly caught that only the extreme end of the toe was
MY OTTER TOMMY. 103
held, so that no bones were broken, and no internal parts
injured.
At my request Mr. Hambro presented this otter to the
authorities of the Westminster Aquarium, where it was
placed in the tank previously occupied by the manatee,
and which was built originally for otters. The manatee
had died in March, and the otter was installed in its
place. The tank was most admirably suited for the
purpose, and being constructed with immense sheets of
glass, was really a palace for the animal.
This otter did not live very long, so at the request of
the Directors I sent up Master Tommy from the Museum,
and I am glad I did, as the sight of the otter swimming
about in his transparent house is an exhibition quite
unique. I have often suggested this exhibition of otters
to gentlemen connected with aquaria, but the Westminster
Aquarium was the first to carry it out.
Not only is this a very pretty sight to ordinary visitors,
but the naturalist had, for the first time, an opportunity
of learning the habits of this Kee Door, or water-dog,!
in hunting for his prey under water. Otter hunters,
fishermen, and gamekeepers know doubtless the habits of
the otter when on land, but their mode of swimming
under water, and their manner of catching fish? in the
' The Welsh for otter is ‘ Ci dwr,’ which signifies water-dog—not at
all a bad name.
2 Besides the cannibal fish of the waters, the fish have to run the
gauntlet of many animals living a great part of their time, not in the
water, but in the air, or breathing air. Thus, for instance, the sea fish
have to encounter the attacks of whales, porpoises, dolphins, a great
many species of seals, besides gannets, divers, and a great number of
other fish-eating sea birds; and here let it be remarked that the walrus
does not eat fish: he uses his tusks and wire-like whiskers for routing
104 MY OTTER TOMMY.
water are probably as unknown to them as they were to
myself until lately.
I will now venture to make a few remarks upon the
structure and mode of fishing of this interesting British
animal, which in elegance of form and perfect structure
is one of the most graceful animals that has been placed
by the Creator on this earth.
When living fish are placed in the aquarium, the otter
ascertains the fact in a moment, and his beautiful intelli-
gent face gleams as it were with satisfaction as he goes
into the water. The first thing to be observed is the
wonderful way in which he glides off his board. He does
not go in with arun and a jump, but dives head fore-
most, almost without disturbing the particles of water, cer-
tainly without the slightest splash or noise.
This he is enabled to do mainly because his head is
formed in a_ beautiful wedge-like shape, a structure
-admirably adapted for ihe work he has todo. On each
side of the head, near the nostrils, are situated a great
array of whiskers. These whiskers are found also in the
lion, cat, seal, rat, hare and other creatures which get their
living in darkness or else under water. Each whisker
springs from a great root. This root is composed of a
bunch of nerve-substance, and is connected by means of
another nerve with the brain. In the skull of the otter,
as in the skull of the lion, we find therefore that the hole
through which this great nerve going to the whiskers
passes is very large, showing that the nerve is also very
in the sand, and turning up therefrom shrimps and small edible arctic
molluscs, In tropical climates the fresh-water fish have the crocodile
for an enemy.
MY OTTER TOMMY. 105
large. The instant the otter is under the surface of the
‘water we see these whiskers come into play; the otter ex-
pands them to their full extent, and they form as it were.
a circle of sentries, so that when under water these highly
sensitive whiskers guide him in all his movements. This
is obvious by the way the otter, although not in pursuit of
fish, is enabled to turn the corners of the aquarium and
avoid obstacles as they occur.
The next thing we observe is that, when hunting under
water, the otter is guided more by sight than by sense of
smell. He keeps his eyes wide open all the time, and
turns his head right and left with a quick motion, as
though looking for his prey. I am however puzzled to
know why it is that the otter’s eyes should be so exceed-
ingly small. They are prominent and rat-like, and
altogether not very unlike small black boot-buttons. Why
the otter should have such small eyes, and the seal such
large ones, | am not as yet certain, but there is doubtless
good reason for it.
When the otter is pursuing a fish, it is most interest-
ing to observe his manner of swimming. He does not use
his fore and hind legs as does a horse or dog, but folds
his front paws alongside his body while he strikes out
vehemently with his two hind legs. This causes his
movement to be apparently by jerks, but the jerks are so
exceedingly rapid that the creature progresses in the water
with extreme velocity, almost as quick as a pike when he
darts at his prey.
I have elsewhere explained that the use of the tail of
the rat is to balance himself when passing along places
106 MY OTTER TOMMY.
difficult to walk on, and that the use of the beaver’s tail is a
not to build his house, as is stated in old natural history
books, but to act as a support when the animal is sitting
up, tripod fashion, at his work. When swimming the —
beaver uses his tail to enable him to rise or sink in the
water, whereas I find that the otter carries his tail ex-
tended straight behind him, so that he guides himself, and
turns very quickly in and out among the sunken roots of
waterside trees. This graceful act of turning is well seen
in the Westminster otter when he seizes the fish. At that
moment he instantly turns, and forms himself as it were
into a ball, so that the fish has not the slightest chance of
escaping.
I have deseribed, when writing of the anatomy of the
guillemot, the wonderful bubbles of air that invariably
follow that bird when under water, and I have explained
how the air is stored underneath the feathers, and given
out when the bird is diving. In the otter a somewhat
similar phenomenon can be observed. As he swims along
under water he is followed by a train of the most lovely
air-bubbles,.which appear exactly like beads of quicksilver.
The origin of this air I cannot quite make out. A large
proportion of it comes directly from the lungs. This is
important ; the otter evidently has some difficulty in
sinking in the water, he therefore lets out the air to
enable him to go down; but at the same time a good
deal of air comes from underneath the fur. When the
seal dives no air appears to come from underneath his
coat.
The otter, it has been remarked, always takes the
MY OTTER TOMMY. 107
largest fish in the tank first, leaving the smallest fish till
the last. He never attempts to eat them under water,
but always comes to the bank-side to have his meal. The
otter invariably begins to eat the fish by crunching up
the head, never the tail; holding his prey by his fore
paws, so that it has not the least chance of escape,
and munching it into very small bits. I have pre-
pared the skull of an otter, and find that the canine teeth
are very trenchant, and almost scissor-like in their action ;
they are conical in shape, much sharper than the canines
of a dog or cat. When a fish is caught the otter immedi-
ately transfixes it through the head with his sharp canines,
the action of which is such that the fish is held by them
as in a rabbit-trap, and cannot escape. The otter holds
the fish for some little time between his canines before
he begins to eat, waiting till it is quite dead and quiet.
In eating he never uses his canines at all, but bites at
the fish with the side of the mouth only. The molars and
the prz-molars are also very sharp, but capable of crushing
any substance into very small bits.
In January 1871 my friend Dr. Norman of Yarmouth
sent me a huge otter. It was packed in a baby’s cradle in
which the various members of the doctor’s family had been
successively reared. This grand otter measured four feet
three inches from tip of nose to end of tail, the tail being
one foot three inches long,and weighed thirty-two anda
half pounds immediately after it was captured near the
North Pier, Yarmouth.
When dissecting the body of the beast, I discovered
what I believed to be a new fact as regards the esophagus
108 MY OTTER TOMMY.
or gullet of this animal. Holding up the pharynx, I poured — |
down thin plaster into the stomach, which, of course,
hardened, showing its full capacity ; it was nine and a half
inches long, and fifteen inches round, and would hold rather — |
over three pints of fluid. The cesophagus was nineteen
inches long, and, strange to say, was a very small tube, the
size of a half-inch gas pipe, hardly big enough to admit one’s
little finger, and only one inch and three-quarters round.
I expected to find it a large dilatable tube, as in other fish-
eating creatures: why the gullet should be so small I do
not know, but the description given above of the teeth,
and of the manner in which the otter eats, shows that
the structure of the teeth is adapted to this peculiarity
in the gullet. If the otter did not cut up his food
very small he would be choked. In the seal, on the con-
trary, the gullet is a large capacious bag, down which the
fish is slipped ina moment. The reader should observe
the seals when fed at the Zoological Gardens; the fish are
bolted, and not masticated.
In my Museum at South Kensington there is a prepa-
ration showing this very curious construction of the gullet
of the otter. JI have remarked that every time the otter
swallows his food he gives a gape, something like yawning.
This must have something to do with the large size of the
stomach and the sinall size of the cesophagus.
I have also in my Museum the cast of an otter when
skinned, showing the muscular structure of the beast. I
observe that all four feet are webbed; that is to say, a
membrane connects the toes as in the foot of a duck; the
hind feet are very much larger than the fore feet, a fact
a
MY OTTER TOMMY. 109
accounted for when we have learned that the otter uses his
hind legs and webbed paws much more than his fore paws
when going rapidly through the water.
The following account of the otter is given in ‘ La Petite
Vénerie, written by a most observant French sportsman,
M. D’Houdetot: —* This wolf of the river resembles the
fox in size, but the badger in conformation. The skin as
long as the otter is alive does not become wetted. The
paws are very short and webbed; he swims better than
he runs. His “spoor” resembles that of the fox, but
is larger; and the heel is never marked in the spoor.
The otter has yearly two to four young ones, which she
lays up in a burrow excavated under the roots in a bank at
the water’s edge. The otter eats beetles, cray-fish, insects,
frogs and water-rats, but his chief food ! is fish, which he
often. kills for the pleasure of killing, as do the marten,
weasel and polecat. Otters are taken by traps, or are shot ;
but are no longer hunted in France with dogs, as formerly.’
The following account of the old French mode of train-
ing otter-hounds is given by M. De la Conterie:—‘ The
puppy hounds are allowed to go to an extreme point of
hunger: then the whipper-in, who is accustomed to feed
them, takes a caldron of soup, and calls them to him.
He walks straight into a river or horse-pond and places his
1 As regards the food of otters, my friend Captain Salvin writes
me :—‘ Otters will kill and eat rabbits. J keep mine almost always on
meat, and often give him rabbit. In the wild state, when frozen out,
otters will catch rabbits in their holes. They often kill water-rats,
water-hens, &c. My otter is very fond of a fat frog. When it eats
eels it puts them constantly into its water dish to help them down.
The otter should be called the “‘ water mart,” itis so like the tribe in all
its manners and customs.’
110 MY OTTER TOMMY.
soup-dish at such a distance and depth of water that the
puppies can get at it without losing foothold of the
bottom. Urged by hunger, and by fear of the water, the
puppies make many ceremonies before they will go in;
but “hunger dares everything.” When the puppies
have been in the water once it is all right ; the second time
they hesitate an instant; the third time they run to the
soup caldron in the water just as though it was on land.
All hounds when excited will run precipitately into a river
or pond after a hunted stag or fox; but it is another thing
to train hounds to take water at daybreak on a cold morn-
ing on the chance of finding an otter.’ |
All dogs will follow an otter’s track with eagerness ;
but his track is not often continuous, as he will constantly
pass over from one side of the river to the other.
‘The otter swimming noiselessly in the water fre- ~
quently leaves his retreat without the huntsman seeing
him, but rarely escapes the hound’s perception. When
the otter comes up to breathe, he shows very little of his
body, seldom more than the tip of his nose for a second,
which is time’ enough for him to breathe. Fishermen are
great enemies of the otter; they catch him in trammel
nets, which are set under water. The number of otters |
destroyed annually in France is about seven to eight
hundred, most of them taken with traps and nets. The
Chinese have taught otters to hunt and catch fish ; they are
said to keep otters as we do packs of hounds. In former
times the otter was much trained in Sweden for catching
fish.’
Our author then tells a capital story how, when on a
MY OTTER .TOMMY. 111
sporting expedition, he called upon his uncle, a canon of
the cathedral town through which he was passing. He
told his uncle he would not stop to dine, because he knew
it was a fast day, and his uncle would have no dinner. The
worthy old clergyman persuaded him to stay. Dinner-time
arrived, and upon the table was placed smoking hot what
appeared to be a roast hare. ‘ Not hare,’ said the canon,
‘it’s an otter.’ By official authority the otter has been
declared maigre, 2.¢., food fit for a fast day.
112
THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN'S
MARKET.
Tur Londoner who is perchance at a loss to discover
something he has never seen before in this great metro-
polis should pay a visit to the cattle market at Islington.
On Mondays and Thursdays, on those days only, we
may observe cattle and sheep being driven through the
streets of London. These are the market days at —
Islington. The market begins very early, and at ten
o’clock the gates are closed, and no cattle are allowed to
be driven through the London streets again that day
until after six in the evening.
Every Friday in the year a very different market is
held among the pens at the Islington Cattle Market.
This begins at one and lasts up to six exactly, when the
great bell announces the time for a general clearance.
I feel certain that few of my readers are aware that this
most curious phase of civilisation exists amongst us. It
is the market for the poor, the moderately poor, the out-
of-work people, the very poor, and especially for the
London costermongers—quite a class among themselves. —
At this market almost every conceivable article used by
civilised man can be purchased, at prices ranging from
one penny to twenty pounds. The articles sold in this
THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET. 113
market are rarely new; they are second-hand—we may
almost say third or fourth hand. To this place, in fact,
gravitate the shreds and the refuse of Great London and
its vicinity—the ‘jetsam and flotsam’ of this huge
city.
On entering the northern gate (my visit was paid in
September) we find the pen which on cattle market days
is occupied by the calves devoted to the sale of old, very
old clothes. These garments are mostly, if not altogether
feminine, and the customers belong to the gentler sex.
The sellers are women. There are four of them in the
same calves’ pen, one at each corner, each with a bundle
of clothes before her. One picks up an article of dress,
and sells it by Dutch auction. She starts with two
shillings: ‘Child’s jacket for two shillings, fur and all.’
After a great deal of chaff and wrangling as to the worth
and condition of the article, she tosses it over the heads
of the bystanders to some customer for the large sum of
fourpence. In the other corners are selling babies’ half-
worn shoes, old caps and bonnets, gowns, jackets, shawls
—in fact, the contents of an ordinary rag-shop. If these
garments could only speak, what tales of misery and
starvation they could tell! It is a curious thing, that if
one of these saleswomen, after putting an article once
up for sale, puts it down on the ground unsold, she will
never pick it up or take money for it that day.
In the interspace between the rest of the calves’ pens
are allotments of ground for which the holders pay six-
pence a day. Laid out on the bare paving-stones may be
seen a most curious conglomerate of household goods, all
in a broken and dilapidated state. I attempt a catalogue
I
—a bunch of rusty horse-bits, broken birdeages, chairs
without legs, old clocks, chairs without bottoms, rusty
nails of all sizes and shapes, lids of saucepans, birds’ eyes,
clock weights, bell pulls, glass stoppers for bottles, broken
fishing-rods, piles of old boots and shoes one would have
thought long past service, buckles, old straps, stirrups, old -
saddles, empty physic bottles, bits of broken looking- — i.
glasses, oil bottles, odd volumes of books, bits of stair
carpet, oil-cloth, &c., &c., besides cough drops, medicines
for rheumatism, and patent nostrums of all sorts and
descriptions.
In order to provide for the commissariat ofthe thousands
of people who attend this market are here to be met — |
vendors of baked potatoes hot from the can, huge deep-sea
oysters fresh from the sea, whelks, mussels, cockles, stale
buns, sherbet, ginger beer, sheep’s trotters, ham sand-
wiches, cold fried fish and bread for a penny, hot sausage
and bread for three halfpence. The articles of food for
sale are really fresh and in excellent condition, as these
dealers know quite well that neither the poor man nor his
wife will buy any food that is not really of excellent
quality. |
At the end of the avenue we come to the poultry
market. Here,on a fine day, can be seen for sale immense
quantities of live fowls, ducks, geese, turkeys, pigeons,
&c. Some of these birds are of the very best. possible
kind—some of the very worst.
Trish ducklings can be bought at fourteen or fifteen
pence each. They are of course very thin, but yet ‘are
bought up by the poor with the idea of fattening them
for home consumption. Irish goslings are sold in large
THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET, 115
numbers, and fetch from half a crown to three shillings.
‘Widows,’ alias old hens, are to be bought at a shilling
each, Most of these widows are sold by the hawker
from the hand, as it would be a dangerous experiment
to let them try to stand on their feet. They might be-
tray their age and infirmities. In the spring of the year
these bird dealers have an ingenious device of dressing
up the combs of old hens so as to give them the appear-
ance of birds in full lay.
Adjoining the poultry market are offered for sale a
number of German hen canaries. At this time of the year
large crates containing small cages of German canaries
come to this country. These birds are all hens. In the
market they are, of course, warranted all cock birds.
They fetch, cage and all, from one to two shillings each.
The German dealers do not send over the cock canaries
until they are clean-moulted and in song. These birds
are not sold in the streets, but in shops, where they
fetch from 4s. 6d. to 6s. each. They begin to appear in
London in the month of November.
Alongside the poultry are also cages containing other
hirds and a few ‘monk’ parrots. ‘ Monk’ parrots are sickly
parrots, which have caught cold on their passage from
abroad to the wholesale dealers in Liverpool, London, &c.
Grey monk parrots were being sold at five to six shillings.
Had they been healthy birds, each would have been worth
a pound.
Near the canary stalls the market is occupied by
rows of costermongers’ barrows, new and second-hand, all
for sale. There are also carriage and truck wheels and
springs in abundance; in some cases there are only
12
116 THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET,
portions of wheels. The spokes of wheels are much
used for the rounds of ladders, and are well fitted for the
purpose.
There are also numbers of carts containing live pigs ;
these are sold by higglers or pig jobbers, who go round the
country collecting them. The pig market can always be
found by the noise the pigs incessantly make.
The eastern side of the marketis devoted to old carriages °
and harness. Here may be seen old hansoms, broken-down
four-wheelers, carts and vans of every age, shape and de-
scription. I was much struck with the collection of the
metal portions of what once had been first-class harness,
especially the coronets, intricate monograms, coats of arms,
and other heraldic devices, which had been taken off
old harness that had seen better days. These metal
armorial bearings were polished up equal to new, and,
really looked beautiful.
Near this carriage department we came upon a lively:
scene, namely, the horse market. In this were to be
found goats young and old, but the poor things were in
very bad condition. Some Nannies are sold as milkers,
and a most ingenious device is used by the dealers to give .
old goats the appearance of being in full milk. A very
young, innocent-looking kid of another goat plays a pro-
minent but not willing part in this transaction. Almost
every description of goat is to be found here. The large
male goats are bought for stables where many horses
are kept. I believe the reason of this is that goats will
run from fire, and the horses will follow them out of the
stable should it catch fire. Goats are sometimes used as
food, and in some cases sold for venison.
%
- 2 re
ee eS
THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET, 117
Jerusalems, alias living donkeys, are plentiful in the
market. In September mokes, as they are called, are
at a discount owing to many circumstances: to wit, the
winter is coming on, the lively time of year is nearly over,
and there is no more demand for mokes to assist at the
sea-side, children riding, school treats, excursions, bean
feasts, &e. In the spring of the year, on the contrary,
good donkeys, also small ponies, fetch high prices from
the gipsies. The gipsies frequent places such as Epping
Forest, Hampton Court and the suburbs of London
resorted to by school treats, &., and make a great deal of
money by providing donkey rides. Good working donkeys
are in the spring worth 3/. to 4. each. In the autumn a
good donkey can be got for from 1/. to 50s. Donkeys are
largely used during the busy fruit season by the coster-
mongers. But many of them cannot afford to keep a
donkey during the winter, so that in October donkeys are
very cheap.
In horses a large business is done. Those principally
sold are screws, such as kickers, jibbers, roarers, broken-
winded, bolters, and vicious tempers. Every infirmity
to which horseflesh is liable may be here found repre-
sented. Among the horses are some fine specimens
of ‘racks,’ that is fleshless horses, simply skin and bone.
They are principally bought up by the knackers, not
for the flesh, but for what they really are, for the skin
and bone. Every portion of a rack not sold for cat’s-
meat is of some value to the knacker. The ultimate
destination of the horses for sale, not racks, is for the
carts of costermongers and little tradesmen. The opera-
tions in horse dealing are principally done by horse copers
118 THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET.
before sending the animals into the market, and, caveat
emptor! Old horses are apparently turned into young
-oves by judicious trimming, grooming, and feeding up
according to their ailments and infirmities. When tied
up for sale the horses are certainly not kindly used, being
kept awake and lively by sticks or whips.
Adjoining the market there are sales which take place
weekly of Russian and other foreign ponies. They are
sold by auction in large numbers. These ponies are
strong serviceable animals, and are received here without
shoes on their hind feet. This is to prevent them frem
kicking and injuring each other when in the hold of
the steamer that brings them over. These horses and
ponies are bought up by speculators in numbers varying
from forty to fifty, and are taken round to country fairs.
They fetch from seven to twelve guineas each. Altogether
the Islington market on a Friday is a most curious and
interesting sight. Take a tram from the top of Tottenham
Court Road to the ‘Brecknock Arms;’ you will be within
two minutes’ walk of the market. The best time to go
is on a Friday when the weather is fine; the height of
the market is about four o’clock.
119
RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM,
7 OXFORD.
I HAVE taken an opportunity lately of inspecting the
Ashmolean Museum at Oxford. This museum was one of
the first, if not the very first, ever instituted in England.
The Ashmolean Museum was founded by Elias
Ashmole, in 1679. Ashmole’s monument is at Lambeth,
with the following inscription :—‘ Hic jacet inclytus ille et
eruditissimus Elias Ashmole, ob: 18 Maii, 1692 Anno:
etat. 76. Sed durante Museo Ashmoliano Oxon: nun-
quam moriturus.’! The collection was, however, commenced
by John Tradescant, who visited England first in 1600 ; it
was then called ‘ Tradescant’s Ark.’ For many years it was
under the curatorship of my father’s old friends, Philip
Bury Duncan, D.C.L., Fellow of New College, Oxford, and
John Shute Duncan, D.C.L.
The following are some of the more remarkable relics
in this interesting collection :—
Model of ancient British village, discovered at Standlake,
near Oxford. It appears that our ancestors lived in circular
holes in the ground, five feet across by three or four feet deep.
Huts or tents were probably erected over these holes; they
must have been very warm and comfortable. I shall try a
house of this kind myself. Soldiers on a campaign should take
the hint.
1 Lysons’ Hnvirons of London, p. 330.
120 RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD.
The Alfred jewel found in Newton Park, Somersetshire,
with the inscription in Saxon, ‘Alfred commanded me to be
made.’ Alfred diedin 901. The jewel is therefore nearly 1,000
years old. I have described this elsewhere.!
A lock of hair of King Edward the Fourth, taken from his
head when his remains were examined in the chapei of Windsor
Castle, March, 1789. This is a very small lock, and the colour
of the hair is quite faded. This specimen shows what a long
time human hair will resist decay. Edward the Fourth died
1483, nearly 400 years ago.
A portrait of the head of King Charles the First (who died
1649), taken immediately after the coffin was opened in the
vaults of Windsor Chapel, 1813: near it is the printed descrip-
tion of what occurred on this occasion, written by Sir H. Halford.
The hat worn by President Bradshaw when he condemned
King Charles the First. It is made of thick leather, and has a
brim three inches wide. The cavity for the head is thirty-five
inches round, and inside the leather is an iron cage, a round iron
plate protecting the top of the head; slips of iron protect the
sides.
Helmet and cuirass worn by the Pikemen in the days of
King Charles the First.
A shoe of the Hermit of Dynton ; who was clerk to Simon
Mayne, one of King Charles the First’s judges. The hermit
died at Dynton, 1660. This shoe is made entirely of patches of
leather nailed together. A picture shows that his dress was
made of the same material, and in the same way.
A pair of bellows which belonged to King Charles the
Second, beautifully inlaid.
Boots of Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester.
Candle snuffers used in the sixteenth century.
A pewter plate from off which King Charles the Second
dined the day before the battle of Worcester.
King Henry the Highth’s hawking glove, a thick glove of
the same sort of leather as is used now by hedgecutters. It
1 Logbook of a Fisherman and Zoologist, page 372.
RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD. 121
must have been made to fit a man with a large hand; the wrist
part is highly ornamented.
A. sword presented by Pope Leo X. to King Henry the
Eighth, when he first assumed the title of Midet Defensor, or
Defender of the Faith. The hilt in crystal is set in silver.
A portion of an old stump, apparently uninteresting, but to
all Oxonians the most interesting object in the collection. It
is a portion of the stake used when Cranmer, Latimer, and
Ridley were burnt outside the Bocardo Gate at Oxford, at the
place now marked by a stone cross let into the street opposite
Balliol College. The lower end of the stake is pointed, the
upper end charred and burnt. This curiosity deserves a special
case to itself. These poor martyrs, who were called the ‘ Noble
Three,’ were burnt a.p. 1555.
A marvellous picture of the battle of Pavia, 1525. The
soldiers are all in very heavy armour. The artillery of the
period is most interesting.
Queen EHlizabeth’s watch and chain. The watch-case is
highly ornamented with turquoise stones; externally it appears
to be made entirely of turquoise.
Queen Elizabeth’s riding-boots. These are made cf a soft
flexible leather resembling thick chamois leather. The sole is
thick and strongly made; it is nine inches long. The Queen
wore high heels, they are two inches high. The boots measure
fifteen inches from the heel to the top; Queen Elizabeth must
have had a very pretty foot. These boots lace up on the outside.
The ladies’ high-heeled walking-boots which extend high up
over the ankle, must have been ‘developed by the process of
selection’ from Queen Elizabeth’s boots. Inside the Queen’s
boots I discovered a small portion of satin, once white and
forming the lining; it is now coffee-coloured with age. These
boots must be about 300 years old.
Lady’s shoe, time of Queen Anne. It is the very model of
ladies’ shoes now to be seen in the ladies’ boot-shops in London.
It is high-heeled, and measures eight inches long, by two and
a quarter wide at the sole.
122 RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD.
A still smaller sandal shoe of black satin. This belonged to
the late Duchess of York. The sole of this lovely little shoe is
eight inches and a quarter long, and one inch and a half wide, a
regular Cinderella's shoe. Where is the lady now whom it
would fit ?
Small picture of the ‘ Via Dolorosa,’ or road to Calvary,
formerly supposed to have been made of humming-birds’ feathers,
now pronounced by the best authorities to be made of trans-
parent enamel. This is said to be the finest specimen of the
kind known, and the art is supposed to have been lost. This
most valuable specimen belonged to the queen of James II.
Very fine old painting (1651) of the now extinct bird the
dodo. The head and foot of the dodo are in the university
museum. A big frog, beautifully painted, is by the side of the
dodo. :
A collection of native arms from Fiji and the South Seas.
Amongst these, without doubt, are those collected by Captain
Cook in his second voyage, many uf which are figured in his
‘ Voyages.’
Three specimens of man-traps—most formidable-looking
things. I have a man-trap in my own Museum at South Ken-
sington.
A spring gun on pivot, used formerly for poachers. Itisso
contrived that it will only fire direct at the poacher. The lock
is admirably protected from wet, by wood. Spring guns were
made illegal about 1826.
An ancient basket-hilted sword, a large portion of which is
completely enveloped and grown over by the root of an old tree.
How [I should like to know the history this sword might tell! |
CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
AmonG the many curiosities of natural history of which
i am always in pursuit, nothing gives me more pleasure
than the discovery of an ancient Charter Horn.
When at Ripon in October 1863, I took the opportunity
of inspecting the celebrated relic of antiquity, the Ripon
horn. I went to call on the Horn-blower, and found him
living in a little house down a court, not far from the
Unicorn Hotel. He had been horn-blower for thirty-three
years, and his father was horn-blower before him for thirty
years. He always walks bearing his horn in front of the
mayor when the mayor and corporation attend church. The
horn is a common cow’s horn (with a metal mouthpiece),
curved in shape, measuring three feet six inches long. It
is carried by means of a leathern strap across the bend
of it.
At nine o'clock every night the Ripon horn-blower
goes with his horn to the door of the mayor and blows three
long blasts—rather a dismal but yet musical sound. He
also gives one blast at the Market, Cross. In former times
the mayor was called ‘ the Wakeman,’ and the blowing of
the horn, I believe, indicates two things: first of all it
answers the purpose of a ‘curfew’ bell, and at its sounding
in former times people were obliged to put out their fires,
124 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
a wise precaution, considering the carpets were rushes,
and the houses were built of wood. It also indicates the
watch-setting, and the law in Saxon times was something
to this effect :—If anybody after horn-blowing or watch-
setting was robbed ‘on the gate-syd within the towne,’ the
wakeman was bound to compensate the person robbed if it
was proved that he ‘and his servants did not their duties
at y‘ time.’ 7
The horn in the blower’s possession is not the original
horn. This is kept at the house of the mayor. I called
upon the mayor and asked him to allow me to examine it.
This ancient horn is handsomely mounted, and fastened on
to a black velvet scarf made to be worn on the shoulders.
At the junction of the scarf with the horn are miniature
silver models of a spur and cross-bow. On the horn is this
inscription :—‘ Antiquis et honorem et premia possi—(I
cannot quite construe this)— Vetustate lapsum restituit.—
J. Aiselbie, ARM., 1703.’ On the lower part—‘ This horn
was again restored, 1854.—H. Morton, Mayor.’ Attached
to the velvet scarf are several silver plates. Every mayor
on resigning office adds, or is supposed to add, a silver
plate. I made a note of some of the dates as follow—
1570, 1593, 1595, 1602, 1658.
Some of the plates, bearing coats of arms and bosses,
are shaped like a sailor’s hat. Several also are of curious
antique shapes. I was informed that the oldest badges
are those of a ‘wakeman’ who lived in the time of
Henry VIII., the name of one Gayscar, wakeman in 1520,
being marked especially. The title of Wakeman was
exchanged for that of Mayor in 1604. Hugh Ripley was
the last wakeman, and the first mayor.
aM
“4
ori
4
oo .
)
a
A,
i
CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 125
I was told that the horn itself is certainly of a date
not later than the Conquest ; that its form is true Saxon,
and that there was another horn of similar shape made
of ivory preserved in the vestry of York Cathedral.
In former times Ripon was famous for the manufac-
ture of spurs. Ben Jonson says, ‘ As true as Ripon rowels.’
‘There is an angel if my spurs be not right Ripon.’
‘Whip me with wire beaded with rowels of sharp Ripon
spurs.’
I was fortunately able to examine a specimen of a real
Ripon spur. The rowel was so ingeniously placed that
the sharp points of the star of which it was composed
would not show themselves unless pressed against some-
thing. This effect was produced by a most ingenious
guard. I recommend our London spurmakers to look into
the matter, as the revival of Ripon spurs would probably
be acceptable to equestrians.
Ripon was also celebrated for some centuries for making
saddletrees and crossbows.
When passing through York I took the opportunity of
examining the horn there. Not having time to go the
regular rounds of the cathedral, one of the vergers
conducted me at once into the ancient vestry, and un-
locking an old oak chest, displayed this valuable relic to
my admiring eyes. It is made of the lower end of a very
large tusk of an elephant, and is of the same peculiar
semi-curved shape as the Ripon horn, which, however, is
not of ivory, but of simple cow-horn.
I am not quite sure whether the hollow of the horn is
the natural cavity of the tusk, or has been scooped out
by artificial means. It is of a dark mahogany colour,
126 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
reminding me forcibly. of the tusks of the mammoth found
frozen in the ice in Siberia, and its surface is polished
like a marble monument; this is caused, I imagine, by
_ the touch of human hands for many generations past.
The most authentic history of this remarkable horn is
given by Sir William Dugdale as follows :—‘ Ulphus the
son of Thorald, who ruled in the west of Deira, by reason
of the difference which was likely to rise between his
sons about the sharing of his lands and lordships after his
death, resolved to make them all alike; and thereupon
coming to York with that horn wherewith he used to
drink, filled it with wine, and by the ceremony enfeofted
this church with all his lands and revenues.’ By this
relic, I understood the Chapter still retains possessions of
great value. In former times the horn was adorned with
gold mountings, and slung with a gold chain; but it wes
stolen from the church in a general seizure of ecclesiastical
property. Afterwards Thomas Lord Fairfax became its
possessor, the golden ornaments having been stripped from
it. He bequeathed it to his son Henry Lord Fairfax, who
restored it to the church. In 1675 the Deanand Chapter
re-adorned it with silver-gilt, and engraved upon it an in-
scription commemorative of the circumstances. The horn
is adorned with four rings, or straps of silver, and on that
which protects the rim are representations of various
animals, all being emblematical: thus, the griffin signifies
honour; the unicorn, chastity; the lion, courage ; the doe,
affection ; the dog, faithfulness. I find that ‘Deira’ was
one of the two kingdoms—the name of the other was
Bernicia—out of which Northumbria was formed in the
early part of the Saxon government. ‘The capital of the
CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 127
kingdom of Deira was York. The horn, therefore, will
date somewhere between A.D. 560 and 600. ‘There is, I
believe, no reason to doubt the authenticity of this ancient
Saxon horn, though from whence, and by what means, the
Saxons obtained so fine a bit of ivory I cannot conceive.
After some research I have obtained further particulars
relative to ancient horns. In the ‘ Archeological Journal,’
vol. ii., there is an interesting article upon the usages of
domestic life in the Middle Ages, in which I find the
following :—‘ The warriors of the North drank from horns,
as did the Homeric heroes, ages before them, and as the
people of most countries have done where horn-bearing
animals were known. In the ninth century the Saxon
King of Mercia gave the monks of Croyland his “ table
horn, that the elders of the monastery might drink out of
it on feast days, and sometimes remember in their prayer
the soul of Wiglof, the donor.” The same Wiglof gave to
the refectory of Croyland his gilt cup, embossed on the
exterior with barbarous victors fighting dragons, which he
was wont to call his crucible, because a cross was impressed
on the bottom and on the four angles of it. This was
doubtless a specimen of that skill in working precious
metals for which the Anglo-Saxons were famous, and for
the exercise of which Eadrid, in 949, rewarded his gold-
smith Alssige with a grant of land. Horns continued to
be appendages of the table until after the Conquest,
although other drinking vessels were in use also. We see
them represented in the Bayeux tapestry, and find from
wills and other notices that they lingered on the board or
in the hall for centuries after the date of that historic
needlework. The mouth of the horn was not unfrequently
128 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
fitted with a cover like the old-fashioned Scotch muil. In
the collection of antiquities in the British Museum is
preserved a very large drinking-horn of the sixteenth
century; so great, indeed, that it was evidently intended
to try a man’s capacity for wine. It is formed of the
small tusk of an elephant, carved with rude figures of
elephants, unicorns, lions, and crocodiles, and mounted
with silver; a small tube, ending in a silver cup, issues
from the jaws of a pike, whose head and shoulders enclose
the mouth of the vessel. The following legend is engraved
upon it :—
Drinke you this, and think no scorne,
Although the cup be much like a horne.
The remains of an iron chain are attached to this horn,
which was probably suspended in the hall of some convivial
squire of the olden time, whose guests were at times sum-
moned to drain it, or to pay a shilling fine. This custom
of drinking from horns is by no means yet obsolete, for
when a student at the German University of Giessen, I
myself frequently became a victim to the fashion of
drinking, or rather trying to drink off an immense curved
cow-horn which had been filled with Bavarian beer, a
most difficult task, for if the horn is not held in a peculiar
manner, and gradually elevated by an experienced hand,
the beer invariably rushes down the incline of the horn
with considerable violence into the face of ‘ the fox,’ as the
new student is called.
In the Museum at Canterbury there is an excellent
specimen of an ancient curfew, and also of a curfew bell.
The curfew, or ‘cover fire,’ which was used long ago to
Bes
-
‘*
4
rv,
"
CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 129
put out the hearth-fires when the curfew bell rang, is a
large curved piece of metal, something like the front half
of a Life Guardsman’s cuirass enlarged.
‘And what may this be ?’ I inquired, as I kicked my
foot against a piece of metal under one of the cases. ‘ Oh,
that’s a curiew bell,’ was the answer. Lucky curfew bell
to have escaped the marine store dealers these many
hundred years, even though you have lost your clapper ;
yet unhappy curfew bell to be so little prized by the
present inhabitants of Canterbury! Surely such precious
local antiquities as the curfew and curfew bell are worthy
of tender care, and a good place in the cases. A new
clapper, too, should be fixed to the poor old bell, and thus
he might once again lift up his voice in the streets of
Canterbury, to be heard by the subjects of Queen Victoria,
after being silent for centuries, and possibly having given
out his last-sung notes (quere, what are they?) to the
subjects of King Henry I.
When at Carlisle, after the Salmon Disease Inquiry, I
had just half an hour to spare. I had previously read in
the guide-book that in the Chapter-house at Carlisle
there was a very ancient Charter Horn. Canon Prescott
on my application kindly showed it to me, telling me that
the object in question was called the Horns of the Altar.
What was my astonishment, on examining this specimen,
to find it to be a walrus skull without a lower jaw, with
tusks about eighteen inches long! The skull itself was
marked out with faded colours, so as somewhat to resem-
ble a human skull.
I afterwards obtained the following information about
this curious Charter Horn.
K
120 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
In the year 1290 (as appears by the Pleas of Parlia-+
ment) a claim was made by the King, Edward I., and by
others, to the tithes on certain lands lately brought under
cultivation in the Forest of Inglewood. The Prior of
Carlisle appeared on behalf of his convent, and urged their
right to the property on the ground that the tithes had
been granted to them by a former king, who had then
enfeoffed them by a certain ivory horn (quoddam corny
eburneum), which he gave to the Church of nis and
which they possessed at that time. :
In 1530 Thomas Tonge, Norroy King of Meet made
an heraldic visitation of the north of England, in which he
recorded as follows: ‘Be it noted that the Monastery of
Carlisle was first founded by King Henry I., the second
year of his reign. And the said King Henry gave unto
the said monastery a great horn of venery, having certain
bonds of silver and gold, and the verses following engraven
upon it: Henricus primus noster fundator opimus,
dedit in teste cartam pro jure foreste. And by the said
horn he gave liberty within the Forest of Inglewood.’
The Cathedral of Carlisle has had these two fine walrus
tusks, with a portion of the skull, in its possession for a
great number of years. They appear in ancient inventories
of goods of the cathedral (1674), together with other
articles of the altar furniture, as ‘one horn of the altar in
two parts,’ or ‘two horns of the altar.’ So antiquaries
came to the conclusion that these were identical with the’
‘ivory horn’ referred to above. Communications were
made to the Society of Antiquaries (see * Archzeologia,’
vol. iii.), and they were called the ‘Carlisle Charter
Horns.’ Bishop Lyttleton, in a paper read before the
society in 1768, said the ‘horns’ were so called im-
CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 131
ri
properly, being ‘certainly the teeth of some very large
sea fish. He quoted this passage from Ray’s ‘ Itinerary : ’
‘They have preserved [at Carlisle] two elephant’s teeth
fastened in a bone like a scalp, which they call the Horns
of the altar.’
The late Professor Harkness, F.R.S., in a paper com-~
municated to the Cumberland and Westmoreland Anti-
quarian and Archzological Society in 1875, thus described
the tusks and disputed their title to be called Charter
Horns : 7
‘The so-called horns consist of two walrus tusks
clamped by an iron bolt to the maxillary bones of a
walrus; the inter-maxillary bone and the nostril-bones
are gone 7 toto; the tusks are misplaced—that is, the
right tusk is in the left. socket, and vice versa, so that
the grooves characteristic of walrus tusks are to the
outside, instead of inside as in the living animal. The
tusks are broken at the upper end, one very much so,
and these fractures are more modern, judging from their
colour, than the fractures which have taken place at the
tips. Holes exist in the upper parts of the tusks in which
have been copper nails, as shown by the green tinge.
Tron nails and nail-holes exist in the bone, and iron rust
shows that it has had an iron rim round its back which
is sawn off smooth, and in such a plane that the horns
hang against the surface of a wall, tusks down, as in the
living animal. In the front part of the bone there seems
to have been a metal plate, probably of silver, which may
have held the donor’s name. The iron bolt which now
holds the horns together is much later in date than the
iron nails in the bone.’
K 2
132 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
‘I have no doubt the tusks and bones have been
subjected to very rough usage after they came into the
Cathedral. When first presented there is every reason
for inferring that the sockets of the tusks would be |
perfect, or very nearly so. An accident could never have
broken and destroyed them in the manner they now
appear. The sockets, when perfect, would retain their
tusks, or if they came out, a small portion of glue would
have fixed them permanently. The mode in which they
have been both broken suggests the idea that the tusks
were held near the points and wrenched violently out-
wards. This would destroy the outer sides of the sockets.’
‘We may safely conclude that these “ horns” are not
Charter Horns at all, but that they were given to the
Cathedral at Carlisle by some traveller, at a time when
such things were considered valuable curiosities, probably
tempore Henry VIII., and that they were used for the
decoration of the altar, being hung from a nail in the
wall behind. Further, we may conclude that they have
been violently pulled to bits, probably by the Puritans,
and rudely patched up again by the iron bolt which now
holds them together, and which may have been concealed
by embroidery tacked on by the irregularly placed copper
nails.’
I cannot quite understand how a walrus’s skull and
teeth came to be considered so valuable as to be promoted
to the dignity of a Charter Horn of a great cathedral like
Carlisle. Iam afraid Bishop Lyttleton was not a naturalist,
or he would never have called the tusks of a walrus the
teeth of some very large fish.
It seems not improbable that they were presented to
CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 133
the Church as an offering by some traveller, and used
as an ornament to thealtar. Such offerings were frequent,
both at the smaller altars of cathedrals and in churches.
Another Charter Horn, the Pusey Horn, is preserved
at Pusey House, near Faringdon. This horn isan ox horn,
two feet and half an inch in length, and a foot in circum-
ference at the larger end, and dark brown in colour. It is
mounted round the middle with a ring of silver-gilt, and
supported on two hound’s feet. At the small end isa
hound’s head of silver-gilt, made to screw in as a stopper.
Thus without the stopper it served as a hunting-horn,
and with it as a drinking-horn.
On the silver ring is the following inscription :—
£ Lyng Buowde qeobe CU pllam Pecote
bys Horne to holve by by lond.
The traditional history of the Pusey Horn is that
Canute being encamped in the neighbourhood of Pusey,
and the Saxons at a few miles distance, an officer of his
army, the ancestor of the Pusey family, discovered an
ambuscade formed by the Saxons to intercept the King.
He gave information to Canute, who, in consequence,
escaped the danger, and for this service gave to the officer
and his heirs the manor of Pusey, to hold by the tenure of
this horn.
Another Charter Horn, the Borstal Horn, was granted
by Edward the Confessor to Nigel, his huntsman, by
whose descendants it is still preserved. Nigel having
slain a wild boar which infested the forest of Bernwood,
near the King’s palace at Brill, Bucks, received a grant of
land with the custody of the forest of Bernwood, to hold
to him and his heirs ‘per unum cornu quod est charta
134 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS.
preedictze foreste.’ Upon this land Nigel built a lodge
called Borestall, in memory of the slain boar.
The Borstal Horn, or Nigel’s Horn, as it is also called,
is the horn of some kind of ox or buffalo, and is of a dark
brown colour. It is two feet four inches long on the
convex bend, and twenty-three inches on the concave, and
three inches in diameter at the large end. It is tipped at
each end with silver-gilt, and fitted with wreaths of
leather to hang about the neck, ornamented with an old
brass seal ring, a brass plate sculptured with a horn, and
several lesser plates of silver-gilt with fleur-de-lys.
Figures of the Carlisle, Pusey, and Borstal Horns are
given in the ‘ Archeologia,’ vol. iii. ©
135
PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, BEASTS, BIRDS,
AND FISHES.
A NEW THEORY OF CREATION.
SOLOMON has said there is nothing new under the sun.
Until March 11, 1876, I had always believed Solomon was
right, but I have now really something new to relate. It
is a new theory of creation—very startling, I admit, at
the same time very amusing.
An elderly man called upon me and stated he had a
box of fossils he wished to show me. He is the coachman
of a clergyman at whose house I once stayed when out on
inspection duty. He said he was ‘no scholar, but he was
an observer of nature.’ The coachman’s theory is this :—-
According to his idea, there were three periods of time in
the earth’s history—viz., lst, thousands of years before
Adam ; 2nd, thousands of years before Noah; and 3rd, our
own time. In the thousands of years before Adam the
world was peopled with ‘ giants and little men ;’ and he
had in his box a great many of these little men turned
into fossils, showing their customs and habits. He had
brought specimens of the little men for me to examine.
He did not know what had become of the giants. He
then took out of his box a fossil little man, a little
woman, anda baby. The little man is about four inches
136 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN,
high, like ‘Hoddy Toddy, all head and no body;’ the
little woman is shorter, but much fatter; the baby is
about as big as a large bean. The coachman is sure his
theory is right, because he has picked up a leg (rather
gouty) and a pair of feet, about as big as beans, in the
same field ; so that they must have belonged to this tribe
of pre-Adamite little people. He does not know exactly
what the habits of this small people were, but he thinks
‘they buried themselves in the earth; they lived like
wild animals, and came out of their holes and caves and
fed in the fields like rabbits; they hadn’t much intellect ;
nobody had intellect before Adam, who had the breath of
life blowed into him.’
‘Types of these little pre-Adamite people now remain
in our own time. They are existent in every village,
in the form of silly people who runs about and knows
nothing.’ The little people ‘lived upon the fruits of the
earth before they knew how to till the ground.’ To prove
his theory, he brought some of the pre-Adamite fruits
upon which the little people lived. Thus there was a
tomato. On,one side the tomato had been exposed to
the sun, on another it had been covered from the sun with
leaves. Then there were some fossil walnuts. One had
been cracked and showed the contents inside. Then there
was a ‘dough-fig,’ showing the stem quite plainly; an
orange which had been peeled ; a ‘ sturshum’ (nasturtium)
seed ; a fruit that had tumbled into the mud, and there
were marks where the little people had been trying to
scratch it out. There were also a mushroom and half an
ego, showing the shell, the white, and the yolk.
Along with the little men there lived a number of
BI
i
4
BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES. 13%
very curious animals; thus there were a fossil bat, a fossil
mole, and other animals he could not make out. Besides
the animals, all very little, there were a great number
of birds and fishes of different kinds. The best speci-
men of a bird was a fossil partridge, about an inch and
a half long, and the size of a large filbert; he called my
attention to the frightened look of the bird. A fossil
pheasant did not look so frightened. There is a fossil
goose that looks particularly alarmed; in fact, so frightened
that he has dislocated his neck. There are no bones in
these fossil birds, ‘ they are all pressed together.’ These
birds still preserve the frightened look caused by ‘the
sudden destruction of period that come on ’em. They
lived on the hills with the little men, and when they saw
the waters of the deluge a-coming up they couldn’t get
away in time, and they looked with surprise at the water.’
The frightened appearance of these birds still remainlng
on them isa certain proof of the deluge. Somehow or
other, most of the birds are very much crushed, but he
‘don’t know what crushed ’em. Their feathers ’as all
gone away through the lapse of hages.’ He had also a
collection of fossil fish that lived at the time of the little
men; thus there is a sprat, a minnow, an eel, a gurnet, a
smelt and a mackerel, all diminutive, the same as the
people. The eel is particularly remarkable; ‘he was
going quietly along through the water, when he was took
with a sudden change of period, and became solid all of an
instant.’ The great triumph of the theory is ‘a fossil
bird’s nest, there is even ‘a mark where the bird leaned
his head over,’ and he has found a bird, he thinks, that
built the nest. There are not many insects, only one
‘138 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN,
fossil black-beetle. ‘ As the black-beetle lived in theperiod
so many hundreds of thousands of years before Adam, he
has now turned into a beetle, white with age.’
My readers will doubtless wonder what all this means.
The coachman has been over twenty years in the employ —
of his master, with whom he goes out shooting a great
deal. At these times he has made his collection of pre-
Adamite little men, fruit, birds, beasts, and insects that
were living thousands of years before Adam.
These wonderful curiosities are really nothing but
common flints. His little men, legs, birds and fishes are
simply fossil sponges, or portions of flint, which, by an
imaginative mind, may be said somewhat to resemble the
various forms attributed to them. His ‘fruits of the
earth’ are fossil echini; his fossil bird’s nest is simply a
flint waterworn sponge, somewhat resembling a small
bird’s nest. ,
He was, however, right in two cases, as he produced
some fossil ‘ sherk’s ’ (shark’s) teeth, and the fossil ear-bone
of a whale. I thought it would be too cruel to tell the
coachman that his curiosities were only flints, and he went
away quite satisfied with the converts he had made. Of
course I purchased this unique collection for my museum.
The thought suddenly struck me that after all the
coachman’s theory is not wholly new. I remembered the
story of Deucalion and Pyrrha, and turned to my ‘ Ovid,’
where we have the stony origin of mankind set forth long
ago. The following is the history of Deucalion :—The
son of Prometheus, King of Thessaly, and husband of
Pyrrha, daughter of Epimetheus. In his reign came the
deluge, or universal flood, which drowned all the world.
BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES. 139
Only he and his wife got into a small ship, which was
carried to Mount Parnassus, and there stayed; and there
dry land first appeared, after the waters were abated.
He, consulting with the oracle of Themis how mankind
might be repaired, was answered, if he cast his great
mother’s bones behind his back; whereupon he and his
wife cast stones over their shoulders, and they became
men and women.
Here are the very lines of Ovid. The oracle says to
Deucalion and Pyrrha,—
Discedite templo ;
Et velate caput; cinctasque resolvite vestes ;
_ Ossaque post tergum magne jactate parentis.
Pyrrha, with a woman’s instinct, guesses who the great
parent is. :
Magna parens terra est ; lapides in corpore terre
Ossa reor dici ; jacere hos post terga jubemur.
Then they go and throw the stones, and the stones
thrown by Deucalion turn into men, and those by Pyrrha
turn into women. The gradual metamorphosis of the
stones into men and women is too long to quote, but
is one of Ovid’s very best bits. He winds up by saying
that the origin of the human race from stone accounts for
the hardihood of mankind.
Inde genus durum sumus, experiensque laborum ;
Ex documenta damus, qua simus origine nati.
May not, again, the idea of the origin of mankind from
stones be in some mysterious way connected with the real
fact so well put in the following words, ‘ Pulvis et wmbra
140 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, ETC.
suwmus’? or to go further back, may it not be an instinctive
hazy idea of what we read and believe in Genesis, *‘ And
the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground’?
When going over Melrose Abbey I found the same
idea embodied in the following beautiful epitaph :-—
The Earth gaueth The Earth hutlyg
On the Earth On the Garth
Glistring like goly. Castles and Towers,
The Earth ques to the Earth he Earth sans to the Garth
Suoner than tt wold ; AM shall be ours.
141
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘ JACKAL,’
THE Herring Commission of Inquiry being duly appointed
by the Home Office in August 1877, it became the duty of
my colleagues, Messrs. Walpole and Young, and myself
to arrange our plans, in order that our official duties
of inquiry might be performed as efficiently as lay in our
power. After due consideration we determined to hold
our courts of inquiry on the east coast of Scotland
previously to visiting the west coast and the outlying
islands, inasmuch as during the month of August the
herring fishery on the east coast is at its full height,
whereas on the west coast the fishings do not begin till
the spring of the year, and we had been informed that
we should meet on the east coast with many of the
fishing crews of the west coast, fish-curers, as well as the
fishery officers of the Scotch White Herring Fishery
Board.
Those who followed the published reports in the
papers of our various inquiries might like to know the
exact order in which the courts were held on the east
coast. I therefore give them in their proper order :—
Edinburgh, Eyemouth, Anstruther, Montrose, Aberdeen,
Peterhead, Fraserburgh, Banff, Buckie, Lossiemouth,
Burghead, Inverness, Brora, Helmsdale and Wick.
142 THE CRUISE OF. THE ‘JACKAL.’
It then became necessary to continue our inquiry into —
the fisheries of the Orkneys and Shetlands, and also many
of the outlying places on the west. For this purpose
the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty placed at our
disposal H.M. gunboat ‘Jackal.’ The ‘Jackal’ first met
the Commission at Aberdeen on September 4, 1877, and
there the plan of our future expeditions was arranged
with Captain Digby.
H.MLS. ‘Jackal’ is a gunboat of 340 tons; her length
is 160 feet ; her breadth 25 feet; her horse-power 150;
officers and men, 60. I find that if the roof were taken
off the church I attend, St. Mary Magdalene, Munster
Square, Regent’s Park, and the ‘ Jackal’ let bodily down
into it, she would exactly fit the main aisle. Her bow-
sprit, however, would project considerably beyond the
east window of the church.
She is a paddle-wheel steamer, built in 1845, and
lately repaired at Devonport. One of her first duties
was to act as an escort tu her Majesty Queen Adelaide
when visiting Madeira. She has also been to the West
Coast of Africa, and, as far as I could judge, had escaped
fever. |
The ‘ Jackal’isa splendid sea-boat. Her officers know
her little peculiarities; she is a good, smart, obedient, crea-
ture, and does her best to perform her various duties in
looking after the herring fisheries. She has a nose as keen
as her African four-footed namesake (Canis aureus) for
anything going wrong with British herring interests on
the coasts of Scotland, and she helps much to provide the
British Lion with food, in the shape of thousands of crans
of herrings.
THE CRUISE OF -THE ‘JACKAL,’ 143
We held our court at Wick early on the morning of
September 4, and the same afternoon started to board the
‘ Jackal,’ then lying with her steam up.
When walking down to the pier, through Pulteney
Town, I was perfectly amazed at the wonderful fleet of
herring boats in the harbour; they were so close and
thick together that it would not have been difficult to
walk from one side of the harbour to the other across the
boats without seeing the water. The quays were also
covered with herring barrels, all disposed orderly and in
due form, forming a vast army of herring barrels, each
set bearing its own peculiar brand as affixed thereon by
the Government officers.
The captain’s boat, called the ‘whale boat,’ was waiting
at the pier-head, manned by four sailors and a coxswain
to steer. They were true British man-o'-war’s-men, fine
strong active brave tars. We were assisted down the
very slippery stairs, the luggage neatly piled away, the
boat shoved off, and we were away. I had never in my
life before been on board either a man-o’-war or a boat
belonging to a man-o’-war. I was, therefore, entering
into a new phase of existence, of which, you may be sure,
I was not unwilling totake advantage. The extraordinary
ease with which the captain’s boat went through the
water was surprising tome. The men were such thorough
oarsmen that the boat slipped through the water with an
easy velocity which I only once before experienced, and
that was when riding in Sir Benjamin Brodie’s London
visiting carriage, the most comfortable carriage that ever
was or ever will be invented.
The whale-boat was soon alongside the ‘ Jackal,’ and
144 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
when we got near, the man pulling the bow oar laidin his |
oar and cleverly caught his ship’s side with a boat-hook.
Captain Digby was on deck to receive us. Of course, the
moment I set foot on the deck of the ‘ Jackal,’ I raised
my hat in salute tothe commanding officer. Her Majesty,
too, is supposed to be always present on board the British
ships of war. Captain Digby introduced us to the officers
of the ship, who at once, by their kindly welcome, made
us feel quite at home.
Preparations were at once made for starting, and for
the first time I heard the merry boatswain’s pipe. In
obedience to the pipe the sailors came running from the
forecastle to hoist in the boat. The run of the man-o’-
war’s man is peculiar; it is a short, quick, heavy tramp ;
the men get over the ground very quickly, and seem to
concentrate their strength in a manner that only efficient
training could bring about.
At a given word the men caught hold of a rope,
pulling all together; up came the boat and hung on the
davits, where she was properly secured. Then came
another pipe from the bow of the ship, and a hoarse kind
of order, whigh I afterwards found out to signify ‘ All
hands up anchor.’ It sounded thus, ‘ A-l-l h-a-n-d s-u-p
a-n-k-e-r-r-r-r !’
Everything seemed to be regulated in the most perfect
clock-like manner by means of the boatswain’s far re-
sounding whistle, piping merrily to the musical click of »
the capstan, the iron tongue of which gave out a sound
like the hammer on a blacksmith’s anvil. The anchor
being up, I heard sundry sharp tings of musical bells, the
meaning of which the engineer officer explained to me
——————————e
+
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 145
as signals to the engine-room, the paddles then began to
turn slowly, and we were off.
The first thing the ‘Jackal’ had to do was to pass
through a fleet of herring vessels coming in with their
fish and nets. There was not much wind, and the steering
of the ‘ Jackal’ was, I need hardly say, simply perfect.
Having got clear of the herring boats, the captain gave a
signal for full speed, and the paddles began their pit-pat,
pit-pat. Captain Digby having arranged all the affairs
connected with the ship, then invited us down to luncheon,
the first of many acts of courtesy for which we were
indebted to him. Luncheon over we went on deck, and
for the first time entered the chart-house, a comfortable
little deck-house in which the ship’s charts and all other
necessary paraphernalia of navigation are kept. We were
by this time off Duncansby Head, the extreme N.E.
promontory in Scotland, and the principal outpost of
that terrible place, the Pentland Firth. In the distance
we could see the Great and Lesser Skerries, and the Isle
of Stroma.
As we passed the Pentland Firth, between Duncansby
Head and South Ronaldsha, the ship rolled considerably ;
it was not a disagreeable motion. The officers told me
it might have been on account of a gale somewhere
away in the Atlantic to the westward, or else that it was
due to the rapid currents of the Firth. The waves were
ugly, dark-looking fellows, and could have been very
nasty had they chosen to put on their white night-caps,
and give a ball in honour of the ‘ Jackal’ and her pas-
sengers. Not liking these big waves, I consulted friend
Young’s barometer, and recollecting the old Horatian
L
.
146 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL’
sailor (Horace, Ode III.) who went on the perfidious sea
for the first time in a brazen cuirass lined with oak, I
vowed a testimonial to Young’s barometer if it gave good
weather during the cruise of the ‘ Jackal.’ This votive
offering had the desired effect, for we escaped really bad
weather throughout our wanderings in Scotland.
Through the Pentland Firth rushes the great eastern
Gulf Stream of the vast Atlantic, flowing with the
tremendous force of united tides through the narrow
opening between the mainland and the Orkneys—an
awful place, where King Neptune lives, and where his
racehorses frequently get loose and have a stampede.
When we were about three parts across the Firth we
saw the headland on the extreme south of South
Ronaldsha. Gradually nearing it, a big steamer was re-
ported by the look-out man. This was the ‘Pharos,’ the
Government steamer of the Northern Lighthouse Board,
which carries oil supplies to the lighthouses on the northern
coasts of Scotland.
When we got to the eastward of South Ronaldsha
the ocean swell began to abate, and the ‘ Jackal’ seemed
to shake herself for a fresh start, having successfully
erossed over the eight miles of turbulent and angry waters
which form such a barrier between the Orkneys and the
' mainland. When we got to a certain point on the ocean,
which the captain had marked out by a pencil dot on the
chart, a wave of his hand to the steersman caused the
‘ Jackal’ to point her nose to the west: we then went on
a westerly course till we arrived at a small island called
Thieves Holm, near the west end of Shapensha Bay, and
then we saw the lights of Kirkwall town; the red light
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 147
at the head of the pier showed the authorities of the ship
where the anchorage lay. Again once more the cheery
boatswain’s pipe, and orders were given to stand by for
letting go the anchor. The ship began to go slow, slow,
slower, slower, stop. At last Captain Digby’s orders came
to let go the anchor ; instantly, the boatswain’s pipe, the
musical rattle of the chain cable as the anchor plunged
with a foam and a rush into the dark waters, and we were
at Kirkwall. We then had to go ashore in the boat, a
proceeding I did not like at all, for it was pitch dark, and
we had to thread our way through a lot of craft at anchor;
but the officer commanding the boat brought us to the
pier all right.
Having arrived late the night before at Kirkwall, and
having to hold an inquiry at ten the next morning, and
leave at three in the afternoon, I had not much time to
look about. By getting up early, and by sacrificing
luncheon, I was able to get a general view of the place.
The following facts I have picked up from various
sources. In Orkney there are sixty-seven islands, out of
which twenty-seven are inhabited. The population in
1871 was 31,241. The largest island is Pomona, on which
Kirkwall is built. The town consists of one long, narrow
street, of foreign aspect, swarming with children. I went
into the office of the Orcadian newspaper, and was sur-
prised at being recognised by the editor, who at once
thanked me on behalf of the pigs of Newcastle for what I
had done for them. I could not recollect much about it
till he told me that I had written an article in Land and
Water in June 1871 urging the necessity of placing
drinking-troughs for the poor pigs that were brought to
L2
«,
7
148 * THE CRUISE OF THE: ‘ JACKAL,’
the Newcastle market, sick and seedy after their long
voyage from Ireland. The result of this article, this
gentleman in Kirkwall told me, was that the pigs now
have proper drinking-troughs placed for their accommo-
dation in the market at Newcastle.
It is impossible to fix the exact date at which One
was discovered, but a Danish historian states it to be about
three hundred and eighty-five years before Christ. Dunnet
Head, in Caithness, was designated Cape Orcas before the
birth of Christ. (Query, is Delphinus Orea, the ca’ing’
whale, so named from this promontory?) The Roman
Emperor Claudius invaded and conquered these islands.
Those brave and clever soldiers, the Romans, seem to have
been everywhere in Scotland. I wonder whether Claudius
issued rations of herrings and finnon haddies to his soldiers?
The name Kirkwall, as Anglicised, is the Danish word
Kirkjuvagr (Kirkevaag), signifying Churchbay, a capital
name, as the church stands quite at the end of the bay.
Looking out of the hotel window in the early morning
I could see St. Magnus Cathedral, a venerable pile seven
hundred years old; built in the reign of Henry II.,
A.D. 1177. Itis built of red sandstone, and is not at all
unlike Yarmouth Church on a small scale. I had not time
to go into the cathedral, but observed that the sandstone
at the great gate was very weather-worn in consequence
of the stone slabs not having been placed flat, as they lay
in the quarry, but turned upon end. The same weather-.
worn appearance I have noted on the stonework of the
door of Durham Cathedral.
I was told I ought to go to visit the ‘ Maeshow,’ about
nine miles from Kirkwall, to see some wonderful Druidical
%
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 149
remains. The meaning of the word Maeshow is not known..
It was a great chambered barrow built on the surface of the
ground, and afterwards covered with layers of small stones
and earth.
The stones of Stennis, near Kirkwall, are also remark-
able Druidical remains; there are thirteen stones upright,
and ten in number have fallen down. I wanted to see if I
could find any confirmation of the idea that the Druids used
to get these heavy stones placed one on the other by utilis-
ing earth or snow; but unfortunately I had not time to
go and see them.
On Salisbury Plain the Druids first made firm the two
uprights ; they then made an inclined plane of snow, and
levered the third stone on to the two uprights; when the
snow melted, of course the stone remained in situ, and
the means by which it had got there were not apparent.
Common earth would have served the same purpose.
This at least is my theory.
In a shop immediately opposite the hotel, I observed
some curious soft shawls, such as I had never seen before,
and also some remarkable thick woollen fishermen’s socks,
made in bright Spanish-looking colours. These shawls
are hand-knitted by the fisher wives of Shetland. They
are most industrious women, and knit all day long when
the husbands are out fishing. The socks are made in
Fair Island, of which more presently.
Speaking of woollen goods, Mr. Bartlett informs me that
recently he had some wool sent him to know from. what
animal it had been taken. He proved that it was wool
pulled from the large mastiff of Thibet, another instance
of my friend’s great sagacity.
150 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
When the official meeting was over at Kirkwall, the
crew in the captain’s whale-boat came up to the landing-
place to get our luggage. We got into the boat, and
were quickly once again on board the ‘ Jackal.’
Immediately on our arrival on board the boatswain
began to pipe up, and the sailors to trot merrily about
the beautifully clean decks. We went below at once
to luncheon, and soon perceived, from the noise above,
that the ‘Jackal’ was getting under way. This time
her nose was pointed due east, and away she went,
pit-pat, pit-pat with her paddles through the beauti-
fully clear water. We -shortly passed the island of
Shapensha.
Before we started from Kirkwall the captain gave
the order, ‘Leadsman in the chains!’ Immediately in
the centre of the paddle-box stands the leadsman. The
lead consists of a long, heavy weight, like an enormous
clock-weight. This the man swings well forward in such
a manner that the weight shall be at the bottom by the
time the ship has made her way up to the lead. The
plunge made by the lead into the sea sounds to a lands-
man like a heavy thud, and is a good imitation, on a small
scale, of Zazel taking her dive into the net from the top
of Westminster Aquarium. The lead takes down with it
a lot of air, and as the big bubbles ascend from the bottom
of the sea, gives the appearance of a rocket with a long
tail of diamonds. The navigating lieutenant was with
the captain on the stage between the paddle-boxes di-
recting the steering of the vessel, and this without the
least noise, so perfectly are all duties carried out on board
this admirably managed ship. Captain Digby allowed me
x ae Pe et)
ee 8 ee ee
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL, 151
to examine the navigation charts. To a landsman like
myself the numerous figures on these maps are not
‘usually very interesting, but when out on the ocean among
a lot of islands, the figures assume a personal interest.
In these maps the lighthouses are marked with a tiny red
spot, surrounded by yellow. The course of the ship is
laid down on the chart by the officers in a pencil line,
according to the lights and headlands.
The first land we saw after leaving North Ronaldsha
was Fair Island, a very interesting place. From the deck
it appeared like a huge solitary rock, without trees,
herbage, or habitations:
Dorsum immane mari summo.
Of course we did not land on this island, it being a very
dangerous place ; and, in fact, there are only two points
where access can be obtained by boats. It is here that
in 1588 one of the ships composing the Spanish Armada
was wrecked; some of the survivors are said to have re-
mained on the island; it is believed that the present
inhabitants have a mixture of Iberian blood in their veins.
The women are famous for their skill in knitting curiously
bright coloured stockings, the patterns of which are said
to have been taught them by the shipwrecked Spanish
seamen. No grain is grown on this island, consequently
supplies must be sent from Orkney or Shetland. I learnt
that the honest fishermen of Fair Island, having such
few opportunities of communication with the mainland, -
are most greedy after newspapers, and that they will
come out in their boats to beg for newspapers which are
thrown to them from the passing steamers.
152 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
Wishing to know more about this curious place, I sent
a copy of Land and Water, directing it to the Principal
Inhabitant, Fair Island. In due course of time I received
from Mr. W. Lawrence, of Fair Island, a long and in-
teresting letter, of which I now give an abstract.
Fair Island lies in mid-channel between the Orkney
and Shetland Islands, twenty-five miles distant from each
group ; it forms part of the parish of Dunrossness, which
is the southernmost part of the mainland of Shetland.
It is about three miles long by about one and a half
broad. In clear weather the Orkney and Shetland Islands
can be seen from it, but when the weather is in the least
hazy or overcast nothing can be seen but the rolling waves
of the Atlantic and German Oceans, whose action on its
coast-line has hollowed out many deep caverns, while
pyramidal stacks and cliffs rise perpendicularly from one
to seven hundred feet above the level of the sea, forming
rock scenery grand beyond description, and a safe retreat
for the countless number of seafowl of all kinds which
repair to it during the breeding season.
The name Fair Isle is evidently a corruption of Faraoc, .
which signifies in Icelandic Isle of Sheep. Torfacus calls
it Fava in his historical account of Orkney and Shetland,
and tells how the leader of Earl Ronald’s expedition
against Earl Paul crossed from Orkney to Shetland, landed
in the Isle of Westray, and wrenched the islands from
the grasp of his rival. This is an historical fact of the
middle of the twelfth century, and the present inhabitants
of Fair Isle have the same legend by tradition, without
any historical record of it. The same tumuli, sepulchral
steatite urns, and rude stone implements, which are so
: 1
als
eset ,
6 ee
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 153
numerous in the Orkney and Shetland Islands, are also
found here.
The present population of the island is about 200,
nearly equally divided between males and females.. Fishing
and farming form their principal occupations. The fishing
is prosecuted in their small fragile skiffs, which are only
the first step above the Greenlander’s canoe, yet in them
the fishermen feel safe in all weathers, and as there is
generally an inexhaustible supply of fish around the shores
of the island, they seldom fail to earn sufficient for a
competent livelihood. The fish are sold to the proprietor
of the island, who salts and cures them and sends them to
market. The principal fish caught are cod, ling, and
saith. .
Each fisherman holds a croft or small farm of from
five to ten acres on the pastoral part of the island, which
is about two-thirds of the whole. On this they keep
from one to three cows, two or three ponies for bring-
ing peats from the hill, and a few sheep and poultry.
The islanders are thus supplied with milk, butter, eggs,
potatoes, fish, and mutton or beef for winter use.
The proprietor of the island also has a store, where
all sorts of groceries, fishing material, &c., are kept, and
he makes an annual visit for the purpose of settling with
the fishermen and doing any other work required. The
gross rental is about 150/. There is no poverty under
any ordinary circumstances. There is an excellent library,
the gift of Lady John Scott, of Spottiswoode. In point
of intelligence the active Fair Islander will make a
favourable comparison with any of his own rank or class
in either the Orkney or Shetland Islands. The establish-
154 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL,’
ment of regular postal communication has proved a great
boon to the people.
Fair Island has been the scene of many disastrous
shipwrecks. From its position in the centre of a gateway
between the Atlantic and German Oceans, where great and
yearly increasing numbers of vessels are continually passing
and repassing, in clear weather it proves an excellent
beacon to guide the approaching mariner; but in dark
nights or foggy weather, surrounded by rapid tides and
dangerous eddies, and without a lighthouse, it has too
often proved itself a dangerous rock, on which many a
goodly ship has been dashed to pieces. In 1868 the
German ship ‘Lessing,’ with 465 emigrants on board,
ran into the island during a dense fog. This, fortu-
nately, happened during fine weather, and the emigrants
were saved; but the vessel, which was valued at nearly
30,000/., became a total wreck. In 1877 no fewer than
five known wrecks took place on the island, the estimated
value of which was above 30,000/. Happily only two lives
were lost in these; but during December 1876 the
wreckage showed that two vessels at least had run into the
island in dark nights, and not a soul was left to tell the
tale.
The island seems to be a general rendezvous for all
sorts of seafowl common to the Northern Ocean.
The common and black-backed gull and the kittiwake
are here the whole year, but are much more numerous |
during the breeding season than at any other time. The
eider-duck, the guillemot, the puffin and sheldrake come —
about the middle of April and remain till October. The
puffin and guillemot seem by general consent to have fixed
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 155
on the 12th of August as the day of their departure.
Thousands may be seen a day or two before that date,
but only a few solitary birds after it. The little black
guillemot remains here the whole year.
The Solan goose and fulmar come after the breeding
season. The stormy petrels breed here, but though their
young are frequently seen the nests are rarely if ever
found. Swans and many different kinds of geese visit
the island yearly for a few days in spring and the begin-
ning of winter. Nearly all the different kinds of
cormorants are found here the whole year round; they
often drift ashore in considerable numbers, dead or
very much weather-beaten, during long-continued storms.
Although many different kinds of duck may be seen, the
eider-duck appears to be the only one that breeds here.
Herons come in great numbers during autumn; as many
as twenty may be seen at a time, but more generally they
arrive in pairs. Some time ago a pair of white-tailed
eagles had their nest on the island, but they have now
deserted it. The white falcon is often seen during winter.
Goshawks, sparrow-hawks, and merlins are very numerous.
There are only five pairs of ravens, but a great number
of hooded crows. Owls and rooks come in considerable
numbers during autumn, especially after strong gales of
south-east winds, and generally remain all winter; probably
they are blown across from Norway.
Wild pigeons are very numerous, and so are starlings.
Plover, snipe, lapwings, curlew, sandlarks, and dunlins are
also pretty plentiful. Larks, linnets, sparrows, wrens,
redbreasts, wagtails (both, the common and pied), are
plentiful also. The swallow visits the island in his season.
156 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
The birds are allowed the full freedom of the island
without molestation, with the exception of the gulls and
eider-ducks, on whose nests terrible raids are made.
Every nest that can be reached by any means is pillaged
either for the eggs or for the young birds when they are
ready to fly. Many a good meal is made both on the eggs
and the birds. Frequently as many as twenty-four dozen
young birds are taken at a time. Great numbers are also
caught in gins for the sake of the feathers; but with
all the slaughter they never seem to be missed out of the
common stock.
Fish abound, cod, saith and ling being the principal
kinds caught. The saith is the chief fishing of the
island, but great numbers of cod are annually taken
within half a mile of the shores of the island by smacks
from Orkney and Shetland.
The Dutch carry off great quantities of herrings during
the months of June and July. A few barrels of herrings
are sometimes taken by the fishermen here when they
‘pan,’ which means when they are forced above the
surface of the water by the saith; the fishermen then
scoop them into their boats with hand-nets: this gene-
rally occurs in the month of August.
Numbers of large whales are always seen for a few
weeks during the autumn while the herrings are on the
coast; they often come within rifle-shot of the shore day
after day for a week at a time. The ca’ing whale is
never driven ashore here. There are a good number of
seals, the large white seal (Phoca barbata) and the
common little black seal: they are frequently caught
by the fishermen; they lie up in the caves, and the
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 157
fishermen go in with clubs and kill them; sometimes as
many as five being killed at a time. The large ones are
about twelve feet long, and the small ones about half
that size.
There is a large fish that comes along and commits
great havoc among the. seals about the month of
November. It is said to be from twenty-five to thirty
feet long, but not thick in proportion to itslength. There
are no otters on the island, and the only wild animals are
the rabbit and the mouse.
Captain Digby told us that the people on the island
of St. Kilda, another desolate island on the extreme west
coast of Scotland, complained of a very peculiar disease,
called the ‘boat fever.’ It appears that for years past,
after a boat has landed on the island, the people have been
subject to a kind of feverish attack. This they call the
‘boat fever.’ This boat fever is no new thing; it has
been recorded as being in existence a hundred years ago.
I think I am close on the solution of this phenomenon.
The fever only occurs on St. Kilda when a stranger boat
lands, and only when the wind is blowing from the east.
The cause I believe to be as follows: St. Kilda is such a
precipitous island that boats can only land when the wind
is blowing from the east. When the wind does blow from
the east, the people in the island are seized with a kind of
influenza cold; and this influenza is imputed not to the
wind, but to the arrival of the boats.
I was told at Lerwick of another disease which was
new to me. It is a peculiar disease of the eye, brought
about by the presence of herrings. To guess at this
disease would be almost impossible, but when the facts
158 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
are known the reason becomes apparent. The scales of
the herring are very thin, and like very thin glass. They
fit very loosely into pockets in the skin of the fish.
The women, in the operation of cleaning the herrings,
handle them very quickly; the scales are rubbed off in
flakes like snow, and are rubbed from the hands into the
eyes; they then get under the eyelids, and can hardly
be seen, being so transparent. The only way to get them
out is for the operator to open the eyelids quite wide, and
lick out the herring-scales with the tongue. Engine-
drivers and people connected with railways, or travellers on
railways, sometimes catch a speck of cinder in the eye;
this gets under the lid, and, being almost invisible, can
with difficulty be removed. Engine-drivers, I am told,
are very clever at getting the ashes, splinters, &c., out of
the eye by means of the tongue.
As we passed Fair Island a great number of sea-gulls
came in the track of the vessel, to pick up what bits they
could get. As the cook in preparing dinner threw the
scraps over into the sea, it was very wonderful to see with
what great ease these lovely birds kept up with the
‘Jackal,’ without apparently any effort. I luckily had
some herrings in my pocket; these I cut up into bits
and threw overboard for the gulls. It was very amus-
ing to see how quickly the birds saw a bit of herring
not larger than one’s thumb floating on the white and
ruffled waters caused by the paddles of the ship. The
lot of them would make a struggle for it, and when one got
it the others would hunt him and try to steal it from him.
After the successful gull had swallowed his bit, the others
would all fly back again at once up to the ship, even
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 159
though it had left them almost out of sight astern. Two
or three of the gulls came quite close over the ship’s
wheel, and I could see with what ease they turned their
head as if it were upon a pivot, in search of food. Their
little black eyes seemed to say, ‘ Please don’t hurt us.
Give us a bit more herring; we have a long way to fly
back home to Fair Island.’
While the gulls were off having a row over a whole
herring, I asked the captain’s permission to try to catch
one of them. Wherever I go I carry fishing tackle.
Having tied two salmon lines together, I first of all
ground-baited with chopped herring and bits of paper,
with herring screwed up, and then tried them with a
Thames trout spinning tackle, baited with a portion of a
herring’s tail. But it was no go; they would not bite.
They came close to it, but were too suspicious to make a
final swoop down upon it. I then tried a spoon bait, an
artificial minnow, and a sand eel, but in vain, the rascals
would not be caught, and all I got for my trouble was a
nice chaffing from the officers, one of whom tried to play
mea trick by putting on to my hooks a fresh-caught burn
trout. So in trying to gull the gulls I got gulled myself.
In the distance we saw several gannets at work. They
came splashing down into the water with tremendous
force. When soaring, the gannet’s wings are extended to
the utmost. When he takes his header he forms his wings
into the shape of a W; this W is gradually closed, and
before he reaches the water the wings are shut up close to
the body, the loose feathers of the neck forming a fender
to the shoulder of the wing, so as to slip easily into the
water.
160 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
Instead of swooping like a gull, the gannet drops
almost perpendicularly from a great height into the sea,
causing the water to splash up. By an admirable struc-
ture the gannet is enabled to blow the whole of his body
full of air, so that in fact he becomes an animated balloon,
the skin also being divided into air cells. I am more ~
convinced than ever of the wonderful adaptation of
means to ends as seen in the structure of the gannet.
Captain Digby told me that on March 19, 1877, the
‘ Jackal’ came across a lot of herring nets between Ailsa
Craig and Ballantrae, on the Ayrshire coast. The nets
were floating on the surface with a great quantity of
herringsinthem. Besides the herrings, there were several
gannets caught by the neck in the meshes of the net.
The gannets had dived, as usual, from a great height on
to the floating herrings, had thrust their long-pointed
beaks through the meshes of the nets, and so were
drowned.
I was told quite a new story about gannets, which
breed very abundantly in Scotland. When these birds
are building, they steal materials for the nest one from
the other. If the thief gannet is caught in the act, the
bird to whom the property belongs gives the thief a good
thrashing, which she takes quietly, and as a matter of
course. If the thief is not detected stealing, she flies
out to sea with the stolen property, and then returns
looking very innocent, and pretending that she had got it
away at sea. So we learn that there are humbugs among
birds as among our noble selves.
Just after passing Ailsa Crag the sun went down, and
it began to get very dark and cold. We adjourned to the
;
|
|
i
i
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 161
captain’s cabin, and after hearing many interesting stories
from our friend Bartlett, coiled up for sleep, Captain
Digby kindly giving me permission to turn out with him
when the look-out men reported the light off Sumburgh
Head, the southernmost point of the Ultima Thule of
Scotland, the Shetlands.
About two in the morning I heard the door of the
cabin open gently, while at the same time ‘ Jack,’ the
captain’s dog, gave a threatening growl. I was awake in
a moment, and looking up, found that the cabin was
dimly illuminated by a lantern. A wet-looking man,
dressed in a suit of shiny waterproof, entered the cabin.
This was the gruff-voiced boatswain of the middle watch,
come to call the captain. I was out on the floor in the
‘shake of a sheep’s tail,’ as they say in Oxfordshire, and
hurried up on deck. The ‘ Jackal’ was out in the ocean ;
it was dark, O so very dark! To quote the beautiful
poetry of Ossian, who wrote his Homer-like poem nearly
sixteen hundred years ago,—
Dark were the clouds of the sky : great was the darkness among
the clouds of night.
Night had settled with all her clouds on the hill,
Gloomy and dark, like the gathering of the rain-clouds behind
the meteors of heaven.
The night is gathered around, let us wish for the moon of
heaven.
Except the watch on deck, and those on duty, deep sleep
sealed the eyes of all those on board the ‘ Jackal.’
Jamque fere mediam cli nox humida metam
Contigerat ; placida laxarant membra quiete,
Sub remis taciti per dura sedilia naute.
M
162 » THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
It is a curious fact that all men sleep soundest just before
sunrise. This is the time when savages always make
their attacks. The ship alone appeared neither to slumber
nor sleep; she rolled her ponderous but graceful form
with a majestic motion as she met the dark rolling seas
of the ocean, and dipped her head as if acknowledging
their superiority.
Tollimur in cceelum curvato gurgite, et idem
Subducta ad manes imos desidimus unda.
Her engines alone were not tired; unceasing in their
efforts, they drove her still through the vast, blue rolling
waves. What would not Atneas of old have given for a
‘gunboat when out on his exploring expeditions, with an
account of which he so humbugged poor Queen Dido.
‘Pius Atneas,’ as he had the impudence to call himself,
was not much ofa sailor. He was a ‘Soldier Officer,’ and
he and his pilot Palinurus made a nice mess of it when
they managed to run their ship (what a curiosity she
must have been!) high and dry on the rocks.
I went to the compass in front of the wheel, with a
salute to the two silent man-of-war’s-men who had com-
mand of the wheel, and looked at her course. Having
ascertained her whereabouts, I was enabled to see how
very steady she was going on the course the captain had
marked out for her. There was a lovely bright star right
ahead of the ship, and as she rose to the seas her bow-
sprit seemed to be attracted, as if by a magnet, to this
star.
Armatumque auro circumspicit Oriona.
The end of her bowsprit was like the foil in the hands of
e
+ ’
ee yy.
ae
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 163
an able fencer preparing for the attack. It tana gently,
first to the right from the star, made a complete Circuit
‘round the star, and then lunged forward direct at her
again. Looking over the side of the vessel, I could just
make out the huge ocean billows over which the ‘ Jackal ’
was riding with the ease of a sleeping sea-bird. I confess
I looked very respectfully indeed at those big dark waves;
they seemed as though they had not quite made up their
mind as to whether they had King Neptune’s orders to
come on board the ‘ Jackal’ or not. I gazed steadily at
them, and found that, as the ship heeled over, they simply
peeped over the ship’s bulwarks to see who was on board.
They found on board the Commissioners, looking after
Neptune’s children—the herrings; so they let us pass
forward over their mighty shoulders. For’ this I was
deeply obliged.
I found the captain in the chart-room, consulting
with the navigating lieutenant, who had piloted the
ship through the darkness of the night. So nicely were
the reckonings made that I was told that in twenty
minutes’ time we should see the light at Sumburgh Head,
and sure enough within a minute or two of the appointed
time I saw the great bright single eye of this island
Cyciops winking at us in the far distance—
Argolici clipei aut Phoebeze lampadis instar ;
as much as to say, ‘Come on, my boys, all right; only
don’t come too near me, please! ’
Sumburgh Head is just the place where one might
expect to find the cannibal Cyclops giant Polyphemus,
whose only eye Ulysses put out with a red-hot pointed
u 2
164 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
stick. One might almost expect Polyphemus to appear
on the top of the cliff. If he had come, Captain Digby
would, I am sure, have sent a war-rocket after him.
We sat down and watched. Gradually the dawn of
the morning became more and more apparent. ‘The
warriors of the night moved on, the ghosts swam away on
gloomy clouds;’ by degrees the lonely and _ treeless
mountains of Ultima Thule appeared on the sky-line.
We were approaching good old Virgil’s
Penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos.
It was indeed a lovely morning. I saw indistinctly, just
as it was daylight, something right in the track of the
vessel; another moment, and just as the figure-head of
the ship, viz., the wooden portrait of a jackal, came over
the objects, up went two guillemots, and scudded away as
fast as wings could carry them. These fellows had been
sleeping out at sea, and had not yet awakened till the
‘ Jackal’ was near upon them.
As it gradually got lighter, I made out the form of
Sumburgh Head, so beautifully described by Sir Walter
Scott in the introduction to the ‘ Pirate.’
Shortly after passing Sumburgh Head I turned in
again for forty winks, as I was aware we had a hard day’s
work before us at Lerwick. When I again turned out it
was full day, and we were gradually drawing into the
comparatively smooth water between the island of Bressay.
and the mainland. Lerwick is a splendid harbour. It is
about a mile wide, and being three miles in length it
affords ample and secure rendezvous for a large fleet. In
the year 1650 the English navy, consisting of ninety-four
a
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 165
men-of-war, lay for some time in the bay; and twelve
years afterwards another fleet of ninety sail remained
there for some days.
The moment the anchor was down off Lerwick the
captain’s boat took us ashore. It was early morning when
we arrived, and there were not many people about. The
first thing that struck me on landing was the great
number of whale skulls lying about, being chiefly used as
supports to keep the fishing-boats upright. I understand
that whales come in here in considerable quantities in the
spring of the year.
Healtaland, or Shetland, is a wonderful archipelago,
consisting of more than a hundred islands. The sea-coast
on the mainland is broken up and indented with deep
bays, locally called ‘voes.’ In Cornwall, similar places are
called ‘zawns.’ Round the majestic cliffs and towering
headlands the turbulent surges caused by the currents of
the ocean are called ‘ rousts.’ In England, similar places
are called ‘races,’ as the ‘ Race of Portland, &e. The
‘sheep, as well as the ponies, are very small in Shetland.
The sheep give the wool from which the shawls are made.
In the high latitude of Shetland the light of day at mid-
summer never totally disappears, and the smallest print
can be read at midnight, when the lingering rays of the
preceding day mingle with and give way to early dawn of
the morrow. During winter the nights are proportionally
long and dreary, and in the month of December the sun
is not above the horizon more than five hours and twenty
minutes.
Besides the herring fishery in Shetland, there are the
‘ sreatlings ° fishings, which means the great fish fishings
\
166 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
with long lines. Among the fish thus caught are, I
believe, the very large halibut, and another northern fish
called the torsk—Gadus brosme, or Brosmus vulgaris.
This fish somewhat resembles the ling, only it is
thicker in proportion to the length. I unfortunately was
unable to get a specimen in a fresh state; the nearest
approach being a salted fellow, split, and without a head.
So I could not ‘make him up.’
All over Scotland I observed that the nets and long
lines are frequently buoyed by dogs’ skins. They catch
Mr. Dog, kill him, cut off his head, and turn his skin
inside out, hair inside; they tar the outside, then tie up
his legs, and put a wooden plug into his neck, and blow
him up quite tight by means of a plug in one of his legs.
They tie the plug on to the buoy rope, and the dog’s tail
and hind legs floating on the surface of the water have avery
curious appearance. For some reason they don’t turn cats
into buoys, and pigs are too expensive. The month of May
is specially dangerous for dogs, as buoys are then wanted.
Mr. Dog gets a crack on the head, is turned inside out,
blown up and tarred, and in a quarter of an hour is anchored
to a net out at sea. I think it would puzzle anybody,
even a judge at a dog show, to swear to his dog when
blown up without a head, and turned inside out. Captain
Digby has on board the ‘ Jackal’ a wonderfully nice black ©
dog, a faithful kind creature. I am afraid Jack (for that
is his name) will end his earthly career as a buoy to a
herring-net, so please look after poor Jack in the month
of May.
On looking at the map of the north of Scotland I
cannot help thinking that at some time or other the
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL,’ 167
Shetlands were joined to the Orkneys, the Orkneys to the
north of Caithness, Cape Wrath to the Butt of Lewis,
that is the extreme northern point of the Hebrides; the
island Barra, the extreme south of the Hebrides, to the
Mull of Cantyre, 724 the islands of Toree and Islay, and
that when the continent was broken up, on the west coast
a large inland sea was formed, divided into two, as it were,
by the Isle of Skye, the northern sea being now called
the Minch, the southern seathe Little Minch. The con-
formation of this part of Scotland has great effect upon the
migrations of the herring, the season for herring fishing
on the west coast being very much earlier than on the
east coast. : .
I confess that before I got half-way through the her-
ring inspection, I got quite tired of scenery, everlasting
mountains, and solitude.
I dislike much the words ‘ tourist’ and ‘ picturesque.’
Towards the end of the journey I positively refused to
look at any more scenery of any kind. At Oban I saw
an omnibus and a four-wheeled cab, which reminded me,
to my delight, of my native home. I would suggest to
those hotel-keepers and others, who make an easy living
out of the mountains, which, poor things, do not get any
share of the plunder, that the mountains should be all
properly numbered and labelled, ike plants at a flower
show. I think that a little variety in the names would
also be advisable. It is always Ben this or Glen that,
every day and all day long. And allow me to inform my
readers that there are no hills in Scotland. A friend of
mine asked a bystander, pointing to the distance, ‘ Pray
may I ask, what is that hill?’ .‘ Hill, sir? It is nota
168 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
hill at all; it’s a mountain,’ was the answer. In the
same way, a visitor to a kennel of foxhounds said to the
huntsman, ‘ What a fine dog that is!’ ‘Dog, sir? It’s
not a dog; it’s a hound,’ said the huntsman.
I must give my colleague, Mr. A. Young, due credit
for the admirable way in which he piloted us through
Scotland.
Mr. Young has a most extraordinary memory for
localities and figures. He has apparently the whole of
Scotland mapped out in his mind, and he astonished us
mightily during our journeyings by telling us off-hand
and with the greatest accuracy the height of almost every
mountain we saw, the depthsand fishing capabilities of every
loch, the lengths and peculiarities of every salmon river,
and the names of the proprietors of most of the shooting
lodges and gentlemen’s: properties that are to be met with
so plentifully in Scotland. I cannot pretend to recollect
one quarter of what Young told us, but my general im-
pression of these properties is that no one in Scotland has
less than 20,0000. a year, and that the proper thing to do
when one has made a fortune is to find out a desolate,
barren island where Robinson Crusoe himself would be
uncomfortable, or a lonely moor where there is nothing
but barren rock and heather, and where, as Colonel ——
informed me, the distance from civilisation is so great
‘that he was obliged to give his chimney-sweep a bed.’
There, in these desolate places, do the rich people establish
their Lares and Penates.
I think I have found the reason why people who have
made fortunes go and live in desolate places, like so many
Robinson Crusoes. In his original state, man depends for
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 169
his existence on hunting, and hunts wild beasts and
birds, in order to obtain his necessary food and clothes. ©
When he has obtained all the food he can possibly want,
and every luxury he can possibly get, then what does he
do? Why, he immediately goes back to his primitive
state, and begins to hunt again. So you see the savage is
not very far removed from the Scotch or English rich pro-
prietors and lessees of grouse moors and deer forests.
I fancy 1 have made a discovery. It is a new sport
for yachtsmen and those who are fond of large game
shooting ; moreover, the shooting-grounds are not very
far from London.
When at Peterhead, on the crab and lobster inquiry,
my friend Captain David Gray, of the whaling ship
‘Eclipse,’ informed me that every year in the months of
July and August, when the herrings appear off Peterhead,
they are almost invariably followed by large Finner whales.
These fellows are often seventy feet long, aye, even bigger
than that sometimes, and they have hitherto been allowed
to hunt the herrings with impunity. The fleet of herring
vessels do not care to touch them, and they are not of
sufficient value either for oil or whalebone to render it
worth the while of the crews of the regular whalers to
go in pursuit of them. I understand that these whales
generally worry the herrings, not by rushing into the
shoal, but by swimming round the edge and driving them
together, just as a colley dog folds sheep. At Newcastle
one of these Finner whales managed to roll himself up in
a herring-net and get drowned; he came ashore near the
mouth of the Tyne.
In Captain Gray’s yard, where he boils the whale oil,
170 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
I was fortunate enough to discover the mouth with the
whalebone still om sitw of one of these big Finners.
I have a little story to tell about this whale. Mr.
Morris, of the Coastguard at North Berwick, about one
hundred miles by coast from Peterhead, told me that a
day or two previous to my visit there, a large whale had
been picked up by some herring boats at sea, and towed
ashore, where it was cut up and sold for oil. This whale
had no head, and it was a great puzzle to the fishers to —
know where the head could be. I rather astonished
Morris when I told him that it was in Captain Gray’s
yard at Peterhead. Captain Gray had informed me that
fourteen days before my visit to Peterhead some herring
fishers had found a whale floating dead at sea, had cut
off his head, and let the body go adrift; the second lot
of fishermen found it miles away.
Now I really do not see why these rascally herring-
poaching Finners should not afford excellent sport to
yachtsmen and gentlemen who often go immense dis-
tances to shoot big game. Peterhead is not far from —
Aberdeen, the Scotch express runs up there in about
eighteen hours. Gray thinks the best way would be to
shoot the Finners with a whale harpoon-gun (a weapon
like a stumpy duck-gun), from a steam yacht, or if pre-
ferred, regular whale-boats might be towed by the yacht,
the Finner harpooned, judiciously played on the whale-
lines, and killed in the same way as the ordinary
northern whale, which, by the way, does not require so
much killing as the Finners. It must, however, be
recollected that these Finners are bad to kill, as they
will sometimes, when harpooned, turn about and fight
THE CRUISE OF THE ‘ JACKAL.’ 171
the boats, using their tail with tremendous force. Here
then there is an element of danger which no doubt would
add zest to the sport of some of our friends. There are
many sportsmen in England who have shot an elephant,
but very few who have harpooned a whale; besides this,
it is to be recollected that the killing of these whales
would be a benefit to the herring-fishers, as it would
keep the herrings from being worried, and prevent the
nets being rolled up and carried off by Master Physalis
boops, for that is his name—bodps because he has a little
eye like an ox.
For those who do not care to go out and kill a seventy-
foot whale, I have yet another plan.
At the meeting of the Yorkshire Salmon Fishery
Board at York, the fishermen made a formal complaint of
the great injury done to the salmon fisheries by the por-
poises and grampuses coming up the Humber. These
hunt the salmon so closely, that they leap out of the
water and go out to sea again to get out of their way; the
consequence is, the fishermen do not catch the salmon.
The hungry Cetacea follow the salmon up the Humber
as far as Goole.
A discussion took place as to the best way to kill
them, whether by net, harpoon, or explosive rifle balls ;
finally, it was determined to offer rewards for their
destruction, and the tariff of reward was settled at one
shilling per foot, big and little. Some are herring-hogs,
four feet long ; some are grampus, eighteen to twenty feet
long.
About July or August whale and porpoise shooting
may begin; and to those who wish to have the novel sensa-
ee THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’
tion of killing a whale, I expect it will be real good
sport. The ladies, by the way, will be interested in this
proposed whale-hunting expedition. I was told that good
whalebone is worth from 8001. to 9001. per ton. The Finner
whalebone is not valuable like that of the right whale, but
still it is of some service. The whales, I think, will not
thank me for writing the above lines.
173
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND.
JOHN-0'-GROAT’S house, the extreme north of Scotland,
where I went in 1877 to obtain evidence from the crab and
lobster fishermen, is a most interesting place. Not much
seems to be known as to who the original John-o’-Groat was.
I was, however, fortunate enough to come across an old
fellow who was up to his ankles in water, cutting his crop
of oats; his name was Jock-o-the-Burn. John-o-Groat
must, I should imagine, have been just such another
character. I learn from the Thurso handbook, ‘the tradi-
tion is that John de Groat was a Dutchman, who, along
with two brothers, obtained by royal charter of James IV.
land in the parish of Canisbay. In process of time there
eame to be eight different proprietors of the name of
Groat. An annual festive gathering having been estab-
lished to commemorate the anniversary of their arrival in
Caithness, a dispute arose on one occasion among the
Groats respecting the right of taking the door, the head of
the table, &c.; and it is said that, in order to preserve
harmony, old John built a house separate from all others,
of an octagonal form, with eight doors and windows; and
having placed a table of the same shape in the middle of
the house, at the next anniversary he invited each of his
friends to enter at his own door and sit at the head of the
174 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND.
table, and so all were satisfied. Such is said to be the
origin of John-o’-Groat’s house.
Another but more unlikely story is that the first
Groat was a ferryman betwixt Caithness and Orkney, and
that the fare across was fourpence or a groat for each pas-
senger, and that the ferryman, whose name was John, got
the sobriquet of Johnny Groat for this reason. There are
many of the name of Groat in the county yet, and from
local records they seem to have been a family of some con-
sequence since the year 1496.
Close by the sea-shore there is a tumble-down cottage,
which will answer the purpose very well of the original house
of ‘ John-o’-Groat.’ Near this house a substantial hotel has
been erected. The Prince of Wales has visited it, and the
inhabitants of this part of the world are very proud of this
ultuma Thule having been inspected by Royalty. I must
confess that the view from John-o’-Groat’s house is magni-
ficent in the extreme. Immediately opposite is the island
of Stroma; South Ronaldsha, and beyond that the other
islands of the Orkneys can be seen more or less distinctly.
To the eastward is Duncansby Head; although the sea
was quite calm, the water off Duncansby was in a great
state of agitation, and it appeared to me that a large tidal
wave, like the tidal wave or bore on the Severn, was coming
round the corner. This remarkable appearance was caused
by two eddies or whirlpools, called the ‘ Bores of Dun-
cansby.’ These bores are at their greatest height at the
flood tide. Off St. John’s Head there is another set of
bores ; these are called the ‘Merry Men of May;’ these
awful waves appear with the ebb tide. The consequence
is that this passage is dangerous to ships passing through
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. ria
the strait, where the tide is said to run at the rate of ten
miles an hour. Virgil’s description, in the third ‘ Atneid,’
of Scylla and Charybdis, exactly applies to John-o’-Groat’s
house :— |
Dextrum Scylla latus, levum implicata Charybdis
Obsidet, atque imo barathri ter gurgite vastos
Sorbet in abruptum fiuctus, rursusque sub auras
Erigit alternos, et sidera verberat unda.
‘Seylla guards the right side, whirling Charybdis the
left, and thrice with the deep eddies of its voracious gulf
swallows up the vast billows in the abyss, and again
spurts them out by turns high into the air, and lashes the
stars with the waves.’
To the westward from John-o’-Groat’s is seen the Hoy
Head, which is, I believe, one of the highest cliffs in
Scotland. It is said to be 1,100 feet high. St. Paul’s
is 404 feet high, consequently this fearful cliff is nearly
three times higher than St. Paul’s. A story is told
of an eagle’s nest having been discovered far down a
cliff somewhere in this neighbourhood. The sum of a
guinea each was offered for the eggs; an Orkney man,
determined to gain the prize, made a rope of heather,
fastened his wife to the end, and let her down no less
than 240 feet from the top of the cliff to rob the eagle’s
nest of the eggs. The rope was made of heather, as
the clever wife suggested, if made of ordinary hemp it
might chafe by the friction against the projections of
the rock. The young woman performed this perilous
feat of bird’s-nesting with success, and sold her eggs at
the price offered. This adventurous pair are said to have
176 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND.
collected, with their heather rope, a dozen eagles’ eggs
in one season.
I was informed that sixty eagles had been killed in the
island of Lewis in seven or eight years, and that there
were about seventy breeding-places patronised more or less
by eagles in Sutherlandshire, many of them inaccessible
to human beings. Grouse-preservers do not like eagles,
computing that an eagle kills one grouse every day. In
the Orkneys peregrines breed, and a very nice specimen
was sent me from near John-o’-Groat’s. The great Skua
gull breeds in the northern Orkneys and Shetland. A
gentleman living at Kirkwall informed me that a demoi-
selle crane (of all birds in the world) was shot in the
Orkneys ; he was, of course, most anxious to obtain the
specimen, but was just too late to get it, as the man who
had shot the bird had picked off its feathers and made
it into soup. |
I was also told a very funny story of the artful-
ness of common chickens. In former days it was diffi-
cult for visitors to get anything to eat at John-o-Groat’s,
there being no butchers or bakers within miles. When
visitors arrived it was the custom of the proprietor of the
little inn to chase and catch a chicken, and pluck and roast
him at once for the visitors’ dinner. In course of time the
chickens became very artful. They kept a sharp look-out,
and when they saw a carriage coming along the road—
they could see a long way down the straight road from the
inn—they bolted, as the French would have it, @ toutes
jambes—with all legs—into the heather, and did not
reappear until the visitors had eaten their bacon without
the chicken and taken their departure. That birds learn
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. L7%
from experience is quite certain; when the telegraph
wires were first put up between Berrydale and Hemsdale,
the grouse were continually flying against the wires and
killing themselves, and in one season the driver of the
mail-cart picked up no less than forty brace of grouse that
had been so killed. Of late years not a grouse has been
found killed by the telegraph wires. They seem to have
passed on the warning that telegraph wires were dan-
gerous.
The sea-gulls at Wick are very tame ; indeed, there are
hundreds of them in the harbour, and they are never
allowed to be touched in any way.
Apropos of sea-gulls,a very pretty sight can now daily
be seen at Southport, in Lancashire. The gatekeeper of
the long pier advertises that the sea-gulls will be fed daily
at twelve o'clock. Their feeding-time at my visit had
long passed, but nevertheless there were hundreds of gulls
floating gracefully on the water at the end of the pier.
The young woman at the refreshment-room close by,
sells bags of biscuits to feed the sea-gulls. It was most
interesting to watch the actions of these pretty birds when
the food was thrown into the water; a great scramble at
once took place for it. I threw in a whole biscuit; a gull
flew away with it, with some six or eight after him, and a
battle ensued. In half an hour or so many hundred gulls
had assembled. This is the prettiest sight I have seen
for a long time.
A friend of mine residing at Thurso, complains
bitterly of the effects of the Sea-Bird Preservation Act:
he says that the gulls, especially the black-backed
gull, do an enormous amount of mischief to the salmon
N
*
178 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND.
fisheries. These fellows watch the shallows, and eat the
smolts; he has taken no less than five smolts from one
gull: in his opinion there are no salmon poachers in the
world so bad as sea-gulls; they practically destroy more
human food in the form of salmon than all the other
salmon poachers in Scotland. The sea-gulls will also
eat oats. They spit up the husks of these seeds in
balls like owls’ pellets; they also destroy the turnips,
inasmuch as they bore holes in them; the water gets in,
and the frost following, kills the turnips. The gulls have
been known to destroy in a six-acre field as many turnips
as would feed three cows. I understand that hares prefer
swedes to turnips, and that it is not a bad plan to plant
swedes to induce hares to leave the turnips alone: this is
on the same principle that the butler advises his master
to put strong ale in the cellar if he wishes to stop the
table-beer from evaporating.
I noted several other matters during my journey of
inquiry in Scotland which I should like to record.
The first thing that struck me was that everybody in
Scotland seems to be educated. At about nine in the
morning, at every place, both town and village, the
children may be seen ‘away to school,’ and they seem
rather to enjoy the prospect of learning lessons—quite a
contrast to the state of things in England some sixty years
ago, when the late Bishop Shuttleworth began his cele-
brated verses on the ‘ Progress of a Clergyman’ thus :—
The fatal morn arrives, and oh!
To school the weeping lad must go.
The lad, however, goes to school, is ultimately rewarded,
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. 179
becomes a college tutor, and winds up with the aspira-
tion—
Oh, make me a bishop, or ai least a dean !
Dr. Shuttleworth prophesied his own fortune; he
became Warden of New College, and then Bishop of
Chichester.
But all Scotch lads cannot become bishops or deans.
Backed, however, by education, they mostly get promoted
—as old Dean Gaisford once thundered out at the
undergraduates of Christ Church, Oxford, in his celebrated
sermon on learning—to ‘ positions in life to which con~
siderable emoluments are attached.’
Education also accounts for the answer of an individual
to the King, who asked what he should do for him for
services performed. His answer was, ‘ Please, your Majesty,
make me a Scotchman.’
Of an evening, in that charming city of Edinburgh,
can be seen at the corner near the post office—
A little crowd,
That bawls so loud,
It really runs quite through ye ;
It’s all the charity girls and boys
A-singing Alle-luia.
These little wretches are not, however, singing a hymn
of praise, but are bawling out the halfpenny evening |
papers. Very few, if any, of these urchins wear shoes or
stockings; but the sole of the foot gets harder the more
you use it, and there are no shoemakers’ bills to pay.
They are mostly scantily clothed, but seem well fed and
happy. I understand none of these urchins are allowed to
nN 2
180 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND.
appear with the papers under their arms for sale unless
they have been to school in the morning.
I saw a little incident that would make a capital pic-
ture for an artist. In one of the jewellers’ shops in
Princes Street there was a magnificent tiara, with bracelets,
earrings, &c., of lustrous diamond brilliants. Two little
mites of children were racing to sell their halfpenny
papers, when all in a moment the glitter of the diamonds
struck them ; they pulled up short, and stood aghast at the
objects to which they were so little accustomed, gazing at
them with all eyes and great wonderment. Here is a
picture, ‘ Poverty and Riches.’
I was fortunate enough to be at the railway station
when the train arrived with a number of fishwives from
Newhaven. They were all dressed in blue serviceable
serge; some were young, some old. They all had their
creels or baskets of fish with them. I observed that it
required two, and sometimes three railway porters to lift
these heavy creels on to the women’s backs. The creels
are so made that the weight rests along the length of the
spine, and is balanced, as it were, by a band that crosses
the forehead.
The distance these women will walk, and the weight
they will carry, are astounding. I was told of an old
fishwife, living at Dunbar, who every morning sets out
on a journey of from six to nine miles round the country
to sell her fish, carrying sometimes as much as one hun-
dredweight on her back. So accustomed is this fine old
lady to carry weights on her back, that when, having sold
her fish, she is returning homewards, she picks up heavy
stones from the road-side, and puts them into her creel ;
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND, 18l
finding, I suppose, that a weighted creel is easier to carry
than an empty one.
In the evening the fishwives come into the streets,
and putting down their creels cry, ‘ Caller O! Caller O!’
which, being translated, means ‘Fresh oysters.’ I inter-
viewed one of these oyster ladies, a charming old woman.
She complained bitterly of the price of oysters, and the diffi-
culty she experienced, as a widow, in keeping her bairns
in clothes and food. So you see the much-mooted oyster
question affects not only the London clubhouses and the
rich, but also the extremely poor. There is a famous song
put into the mouths of these poor ‘ Caller O’ women :—
Wha will buy my caller herring ?
They’re no brought here without brave daring.
Some call them lives of men.
Wha will buy my caller herring,
Fresh drawn frae the Forth ?
I have received, through the kindness of an Edinburgh
lady, a very pretty song, called ‘The Oyster Girl.’ I
would advise my young lady readers (if any) to get this
song. The melody is very pretty, and the chorus, ¢ Caller
O!’ sweet and far-sounding, like the Swiss jodel songs
with which the shepherd girls on the Alps awake the
echoes to call their cows home.
By association with the fisher-people I have, I think,
found out the meaning of that very common expression in
Scotland, ‘They call him.’ If you ask a peasant in Scot-
land, ‘ Who is that ?’ the answer is sure to be, ‘ They call
him’ So-and-so. Now, the fisher-people intermarry among
themselves. The consequence is that the same surnames
in a village get very much multiplied. Hence the origin
182 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND.
of the term ‘Tee names,’ such as ‘Jock of the Burn,’
‘Sandy,’ &e., in cases where almost everybody bears the
name, say for example, of ‘ Buchan.’
Among the Scotch, there is, I find, often a vein “sf the
comic. I asked a boy at a railway station, ‘ When will the
train start?’ ‘She'll just start when ye are all ready,’
was the quick answer. A gentleman living near Peter-
head one morning ordered his machine (by the way, why
are all possible kinds of carriages in Scotland called ma-
chines?) at ten. He kept his old servant out in the wet
holding the horse till twelve. On coming out two hours
after his time he said, ‘ John, I fear I have kept you wait-
ing.’ John simply touched his hat, and grinning broadly
replied, ‘ I'll no contradict ye, sir.’
One of the most interesting facts I came across in
Scotland was the remains of fire-worship at Burghhead,
near Forres. A very ancient rite is there still carried on,
called the clavie. On the last day of the old year, old
style, which falls on January 12, a large tar-barrel is set
on fire, and carried by one of the fishermen round the
town, while the assembled folks shout and holloa. If the
man who carries the barrel falls, it is an omen of misfor-
tune to him or his family. The circuit of the town having
been made by the man with the burning barrel, it is
placed on a large stone on the very top of the neighbour- ~
ing cliff, and more fuel is added. The sparks, as they
fly upwards, are supposed to be witches and evil spirits
leaving the town, the populace hoot and _ execrate
them accordingly. The fire-barrelis then placed on an
ancient Roman altar to finish its burning out; this altar
is called the douro. As the barrel falls in pieces the
Pe ee ae ee ee eS ee
‘
=
* 40s
|
NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. 183
fisher-wives rush in, and endeavour to get a lighted bit
of the wood; with this light the fire on the hearth of
the cottage is at once kindled, and it is, I understand,
lucky to keep this same fire going all the year round.
_ Bits of the charcoal of the clavie fire-barrel are also col-
lected and suspended in the chimney, to keep away
witches and evil spirits.
It appears to me that this curious ceremony of the
clavie and the douro are the remains of fire-worship. |
I examined the douro, and also a curious Roman well,
and some rude ancient Roman sculpture in the harbour-
master’s office, built into a wall near the douro.
I am informed that up to a very recent date, the
carrying of a tar-barrel was also a regular custom with
the lads of Stromness on Christmas and New Year’s Eves;
and when the tar in the barrel got spent, the barrel was
carried to Brinkie’s Brae, and there burnt. Sometimes a
boat with tar on fire in a pot inside of it was substituted
for the barrel, and drawn through the streets by many
willing hands, who sang sea songs as they passed along.
184
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
I visIrED Great Yarmouth in October 1875, to procure
some particulars for my official report on ‘The Fisheries
of Norfolk.2!_ When I had been there in June the sea
was almost as calm as a sheet of glass, and little wave-
lets gently washed upon the beach, the sands of which
were quite hot to the touch. The visitors were basking
on the shingle, or being photo’d by the photographer
on the beach, and the pleasure-boats were merrily
dancing about Vela dabant leti et spumas salis wre
vuebant. On looking out of the window of the Royal
Hotel on this October morning I found the weather
entirely changed from what it wasin June. An autumnal
gale, which had for some days been threatening, had come
into port from the north-east. The great ‘ white horses ’
came rolling in from over the Scroby and other sandbanks
outside, and reaching the shallow gracefully curled them-
selves over, and then suddenly broke up with an awful
thud. They then formed themselves into light squadrons
of air-bubbles innumerable, which rushed up the beach
with a Balaclava-like charge, rattling the pebbles and
shingle, and making a terrible din as the waves hurled
them ashore, or swept them violently seawards. The
1 The Norfolk Fisheries Act, now in operation, was founded on this
report.
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 185
_ thought struck me that this boiling of the great waters
was a happy provision of the Creator to aérate His ocean,
for—
The sea is His, and He made it.
If the sea were allowed to remain stagnant several days
together, the water would become decomposed, lose its oxy-
gen, and be unfit for the sustenance of fish and the myriad
forms of animal life, ‘the things creeping innumerable,’
which inhabit its vast waters. Storms, therefore, though
often terribly injurious to human life and property, are
necessary in the economy of the universe. Without them
we know not what catastrophe might happen in the ocean
world. It might even be ‘all up’ with the herrings.
As I came out of the hotel the wind came round the
corner with such violence that it was positively difficult
to progress. Dense sand-clouds came dashing in from
the shore with terrific violence, and in many places sand
covered the roadway so thickly that the carriages had
to go slowly through these newly formed obstructions.
However, we went out to the end of the pier, and it was
very beautiful to see the huge waves roll in with their
white-crested foam, and charge the piles of the pier till
the whole structure shivered again.
I immediately thought of Virgil’s deseription of a
storm which caught poor old Afneas, after he and his
army (like the Russians at the Crimea) had got a hiding
at Troy. What a fool he was to let that wooden horse,
filled with his enemies, Greek soldiers, into the city!
/Emneas could not have been a good observer, especially of
horses.
186 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
And first of all, ladies and gentlemen, you must know
that in olden times lived, and may be even now living
at the bottom of the sea (especially in the North Sea
opposite Yarmouth), King Neptune, the lord of the sea.
The following beautiful description of the king’s submarine
palace and horses has been recorded by friend Homer.
I give the translation in English, as the Greek may be a
httle difficult to some of my readers :—
‘Presently King Neptune descended from the rugged
mountain, rapidly advancing on foot, and the high hills
and woods trembled at Neptune’s tread. Thrice, indeed,
he strode forward, and with the fourth stride reached
Ege (i.e, Yarmouth), the place he sought. There
lofty mansions, resplendent with gold, ever incorruptible,
are erected for him in the depth of the sea. There
he yoked to his chariot the brazen-footed horses swiftly
flying with golden manes, but himself he clad in gold,
took his golden lash, beautifully fabricated, and mounted
the chariot. He drove over the billows ; the whales, ex-
ulting around him, rose on all sides from their recesses
to hail their king. The seas stood asunder for joy, and
the chariot flew very rapidly, nor was the brazen axle
wetted beneath; so his horses bounding on bore him
to the ships of the Greeks’ (%.e., the Yarmouth and
Gorleston fleet of herring-smacks).
‘There is an ample cave in the abysses of the deep
sea between Tenedos and the rugged Imbrus’ (%.e., out
in the ‘Silver pits’ between Norway and Scotland, where
the soles live, so well known to the Yarmouth trawlers).
‘There Neptune, the shaker of the earth, stopped his
horses, and loosing them from the chariot, cast beside
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH, 187
them ambrosial fodder to eat, and round their feet he
threw golden chains invincible, insoluble, that there they
might wait their king’s return.’
Virgil takes up this idea very beautifully. The cave
where Neptune pulled up his four-in-hand is the cave of
Kolus, the king of the winds :—
Hic vasto rex AXolus antro
Luctantes ventos tempestatesque sonoras
Imperio premit ac vinclis et carcere frenat.
Illi indignantes magno cum murmure montis
Circum claustra fremunt. Celsa sedet Afolus arce
Sceptra tenens, mollitque animos et temperat iras.
‘Here in a vast cave King Molus controls, with im-
perial sway, the turbulent winds and blustering tempests,
and confines them with chains in their prison. They
chafe indignant with loud roar around their mountain
barriers. AZolus, seated on a lofty throne, wields his
sceptre, and therewith calms their fury and moderates
their rage.’ |
It appears that Madame Jupiter, that is, Juno (she
must have been a disagreeable mawther'), had a spite
against poor Aineas for some reason or other, so she went
to AKolus, and, woman-like, humbugged him with the
promise of a bride, one Miss ‘ Deiopcea’ (rather a nice
girl, I should think, from hername). Juno then persuaded
/Eolus to let his pack of winds out of their kennel, and so
turn all Afneas’s fleet into ‘ Vanguards,’ and send them
to the ‘bottom of the deep blue sea.’ The following is
the description of King Aolus starting his winds for the
race across the ocean :—
1 Yarmouth for ‘ young woman.’
188 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
Hee ubi dicta cavum conversa cuspide montem
Impulit in latus ; ac venti velut agmine facto
Qua data porta, ruunt et terras turbine perflant.
Incubuere mari totumque a sedibus imis
Una Eurusque Notusque ruunt, creberque procellis
Africus et vastos volvunt ad litora fluctus.
Insequitur clamorque virum stridorque rudentum.
‘Thus having said, whirling the point of his spear, he
struck the hollow mountain’s side; the winds, as in a-
formed battalion, rush forth at every vent, and scour over
the lands in giddy whirls. They ply the ocean furiously,
and at once, the east and south and stormy south-west
winds plough up the whole deep from its lowest bottom,
and roll vast billows to the shores. The cries of the sea-
men succeed, and the cracking of the cordage.’
Well, then in came olus’ mighty winds to have a
turn at the good people of Yarmouth, and a very beauti-
ful sight it was. Presently a big steamer appeared in
the offing, and up went a flag on the staff opposite the
Sailors’ Home, and in an amazingly short time the
sharp-eyed signalman made out her flag with the tele-
scope. Her letters were W. D. R.; the books showed
that she was the ‘Bradspeth.’ In a few minutes more
it was known in London that the ‘ Bradspeth’ was passing
Yarmouth. The telegraph, close to the beach, is doing
wonders for the trade of Yarmouth. Every ship as
she passes Yarmouth shows her number by means of flags.
By referring to the book in the signal-house it can be
immediately seen who she is, and the news appears in the
shipping papers the next morning.
Among the noticeable features of Yarmouth are the
“look-outs.’ These are scaffolds, with a platform on the
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 189
top, from which the men on duty can see an immense dis-
tance out to sea. When we were standing on the pier I
saw a crowd begin to collect on the shore at some little dis-
tance. Of course, I ran to see what was the matter, and
was shocked to see, just washed ashore, a poor lad who had
been drowned when bathing a few days back. I was so
sorry for the poor lad, and thought of his father and mother
when they heard the news. A bystander told me that no
less than twenty-three poor sailors were once washed ashore
by one tide from a wreck outside.
Many shipwrecks occur every winter. The lifeboat
bell clanging loudly in the midst of a gale of wind in the
dead of a winter’s night, to signal the ‘turn-out’ to the
beachmen from their slumbers, is a sound which if once
heard will never be forgotten. I should like some musi-
cian to write a song, ‘Hark! ’tis the Lifeboat Bell.’
From October to May the big lifeboat is kept on the
beach close to the water, to be ready at a moment’s notice ;
the rest of the year it lives in its stable. Ifthe boat is
launched for saving life in reply to signals of distress at
sea during the night-time, a certain fee is always payable.
If the boat is launched in the day, half the amount is
claimed. The smaller ‘surf-boat,’ as it is called, also re-
ceives regular fees for launching to save life. The sands
near Yarmouth are terribly dangerous.
Year after year, more especially during the time of
the equinoctial gales, very disastrous shipwrecks take
place; indeed, it is estimated that of the wrecks in
each year off the coast of Great Britain, more than
half occur off the eastern coast. There are various sands
which protect the Roads: Scroby hes opposite the town,
190 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. *
and is the principal one in extent; the others are
N ewarp, Cockle, Barber Corton, Newcomb, and Holm
Sands. The entrances to the Roads are by gatways, the
principal of which are St. Nicholas’ and Hewitt’s.
From the Britannia Pier we could see some vessels at
anchor, rolling and pitching about in a most fearful
manner; so much did they roll that it was easy to see
down their cabin stairs, and the wonder was thet oo men
were not washed out of them.
Fogs are very nasty things in the North Sea. When
going through Yarmouth Harbour I heard a most dismal
sound ; this noise was our friend Captain Emerson, of the
Trinity Board, making hideous diapasons with his new
patent steam fog-horn.
I must not omit to mention that excellent institution,
the Sailors’ Home, on the beach. In this admirable in-
stitution there is every possible convenience for the care
of shipwrecked sailors. A most excellent place it is, and
well worthy the support of visitors and the public in
general. During the past year no less than 138 ship-
wrecked sailors were relieved, making the total number
received since its establishment 3,986.
In the yard of the Custom House I examined a capital —
mermaid on duty at the foot of the signal post. She is
life-size, and represents a really very pretty woman; the
fish’s tail is capitally made. This mermaid answers exactly
to Horace’s description,—
Desinit in piscem mulier formosa superne.
One of the most curious features in Yarmouth is its
‘Rows,’ and in this respect it resembles no other town in
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 191
England. The ‘Rows’ are straight, long, and narrow,
with houses on either side; the residents*have been
known to shake hands from opposite windows. They are
paved with large pebbles from the beach.
I understand that these Rows were invented by the
fishermen who were the first inhabitants of Yarmouth;
they used to hang their herring nets in long rows on the
beach. After a time they built the huts alongside the
beach; the houses in time took the places of the huts;
this, then, was the origin of the Yarmouth Rows.
It was necessary, of course, that some provision should
be made to get heavy goods down to the houses in the
Rows. In Yarmouth, therefore, there exists a kind of cart
which, I believe,is unique. ‘Two long and strong timbers
form the shafts for the horse. Immediately behind the
horse’s tail boards are inserted between the shafts, and
then comes a platform somewhat in the shape of an easy
chair, the seat sloping, and without arms. The whole of
this rude, but yet very convenient kind of vehicle, is sup-
ported by two wheels cut out of solid wood, and joined
together by a wooden axle, which run inside as in a rail-
way carriage. Wheels of this kind are of very ancient
origin, and if I recollect right the war chariot of the
ancient Romans ran upon solid wheels just like these
Yarmouth carts, which are called trolls. The fact is, it
is a very difficult thing indeed to make a wheel or a barrel.
The only thing that beat Robinson Crusoe was the manu-
facture of a cask, and I dare say there are very few of my
readers who know how to make a watertight cask.
When the trawlers come in laden with fish they trans-
fer them to very large boats rowed by several men, and
192 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
thence into trolls, which are backed into the water.
These boat are very strong, and admirably fitted to fight
the surf, which sometimes breaks with terrific foree. The —
poor horses must suffer much in drawing the heavy-laden
trolls through the deep shingle; surely, for humanity’s
sake, a platform or tramway of some kind might be de-
vised and put into operation.
The Church of St. Nicholas at Yarmouth is most inter- —
esting. The organ is said to be inferior only in power to
the celebrated organ at Haarlem. When completed it
will be one of the best, if not the best, in England. Over
this venerable organ is a gilt figure of a bishop, with mitre
and crosier. To this venerable wooden prelate I took a
great fancy. This Yarmouth bishop is very like in face
to our founder of Winchester College and New College,
Oxford, William of Wykeham.
When visiting this beautiful church at Yarmouth, the
visitor cannot fail to be struck with the numerous records
of officers and men of merchant and other ships who have
been drowned in the great North Sea, itself not so very
far from the walls of St. Nicholas.
Behind the door of the church, at the west end, is an
enormous bone, which looks exactly like a huge arm-chair.
The parishioners of Yarmouth do not seem to know much
about this bone; and at first it gave me some little trouble
to find out what it really was. Ultimately I made out
quite suddenly that it is part of the skull—the occipital
bone and part of the parietal—of a large sperm whale, pro-
bably washed ashore near Yarmouth, and converted into a
relic for the church. The vicar, the Rev. Mr. Venables,
could not tell me what it was, but I have cut up the skull
al
Se
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 193
of a common porpoise to represent this balzenarian chair
in St. Nicholas’s Church, and prove that my diagnosis
of its nature is correct !
Yarmouth is a very healthy place, and I advise any
who do not know whither to go fora holiday to patro-
1 The following note is from Lubbock’s Fauna of Norfolk, 2nd ed.,
p. 16 :-—
‘No recent occurrence of the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus
Linn.) on the Norfolk coast is on record, but Sir Thomas Browne says,
«“ A spermaceti whale sixty-two feet long [came on shore] near Wales
[about 1646]; another of the same kind twenty years before [June 1626 |
at Hunstanton ; and not far off eight or nine came ashore, and two had
young ones after they were forsaken by the water ” (Wilkin’s edit. iv.
p.326). In December 1626, according to Booth’s History of Norfolk (ix.
p. 33), a great whale, fifty-seven feet in length—from his excellent descrip-
tion evidently a male sperm whale—was cast on shore at Holme-next-the-
Sea; and lastly, Mr. Arthur Bacon, of Yarmouth, writes to Sir Thomas
Browne, on May 10, 1652, of the sperm whale cast on shore there (i. p. 369).
In St. Nicholas’ Church, Great Yarmouth, is the basal portion of the skull
of a whale of this species. It is placed near the door at the west end
of the church, and used asa chair. Mr. C. J. Palmer, of Yarmouth,
informs me that in the churchwardens’ accounts for 1606 there is a
charge of eight shillings for painting this skull, which fully establishes
its great antiquity. The full-grown males of the sperm whales are said
to be generally solitary in their habits, except when migrating from one
place to another; and it seems probable that the majority of those
which occur singly on the British shores are these solitary males, which
have wandered from their true habitat, the warm sea sof the tropics.
But when they visit usin numbers, as mentioned by Sir Thomas Browne,
they are most likely adult females, or young males, which associate in
separate herds.’
These wandering parties would, as a matter of course, be more fre-
quent when the species was more numerous, and when once entangled
in the shallows of the German Ocean, want of sea room and of suitable
nourishment would soon bring about their destruction. The statement
by Swinden (p. 885, edition published 1772) is as follows :—‘ Near this
door, under a niche, stands a large old jaw-bone of a whale. It formerly
was used for a seat at the church grate (gate ?) under the old Guildhall.’
Comparative anatomy was not understood then as it now is, or this would
not have been mistaken for a jaw-bone. It is the portion of the skull
upon which the lower part of the brain rests,
10)
194 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
nise Yarmouth. So healthy is this interesting seaport,
that I understand from my friend Dr. N orman that the
gravedigger some time since became insolvent through
want of professional occupation. When brought up be-
fore the County Court he attributed his insolvency to
better drainage of the town, and the supply of water
from Ormsby Broad, but more especially to the scarcity of
doctors as compared with former times, when he first
entered upon his professional duties. ‘ Gentlemen,’ said
he, ‘a poor fellow then had some chance of a living ; now
I have only buried twelve and a half the last fortnight,
so I leave you to guess how I have to get a bit of bread in
these here hard times.’
The trawlers of the North Sea have, above all men,
opportunities of finding out much that is going on in the
subaqueous treasure-houses of the ocean. This ocean is
not only the habitation of myriads of living creatures, but
is also a cemetery containing the bones of creatures that
lived in past ages.
Amongst the treasures of the deep often brought up by
trawlers or their nets, the bones of elephants frequently
occur. In the museum of the Sailors’ Home at Yarmouth.
there is a’ very interesting collection of the bones of
elephants, dredged up between the English coast and
Heligoland, off the mouth of the Elbe.
At no very ancient geological period England was cer-
tainly united with France, and it is supposed by some that
the Thames did not at that time flow into the sea at the
place where it now does, but that the river broke through
the ridge of chalk, somewhere to the northof Reading, and
- emptied itself into the ocean in the estuary of the Humber.
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 195
At the same time it is the opinion of some that a mighty
river larger than the Rhine drained the European con-
tinent. |
These two rivers probably brought down into the sea
the bodies of dead elephants. This, I believe, is the
~ usual explanation of their bones being found in the North
Sea: but elephants’ bones are found abundantly in other
parts of England, at Woolwich, Sheppey, the London gravel
beds, Oxfordshire, Abingdon, Arundel, and many other
places. It may be that the North Sea now eovers tracts
once shaded by forests, the home of these huge beasts.
Yarmouth, as we all know so well, is one of the chief
fishery ports in England. There are 400 to 500 smacks
marked Y. H. registered at this port, and besides these a
fleet of Scotch and other boats come here every autumn
for the herring fishing; the value of the fish landed each
year at Yarmouth is very great—but I am not writing
a fishery book, so must not be tempted into details.
Not only does the sea at Yarmouth yield fish, but also
even, sometimes, ready-made money, for when looking
over the Britannia Pier, during the yale, I noticed many
men and boys anxiously waiting the coming in of the big
waves. Every now and then one of them would rush into
the boiling wash and snatch up something out of the
shingle. I ascertained that these people were looking for
money, which was being washed out from the shingle com-
posing the beach. One man got as many as six sovereigns
the day I was there, others smaller sums; the theory is
that visitors drop the money out of their pockets when
lying on the shingle.
Nearly every year coins are found on Yarmouth beach.
0 2
196 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
From sixteen to twenty sovereigns were found lately near
the pier; they were all of modern date. This is a matter
worthy of further investigation. I don’t think the theory
of visitors dropping their sovereigns will quite do.
I also heard a new theory why the weather was so
bad at one time. An old salt was smoking his clay and
looking out discontentedly seawards. On being asked the
cause of the bad weather the old man gave the following
account :—
‘Yesee,’ he says, ‘it’s all along of the san; the sun, he
have a shiny side and he have a dark side, and now he
turns his dark side to Yarmouth. I have a friend in the
town they call a hastronomer as pilots the stars, and he
says the old sun got foul of the comet, he got jammed up
in the meshes of this ’ere comet’s tail. Then directly after
there come a heclipse, and the sun, he has never been
hisself not never since ; heain’t well, and can’t do his waark
[work] not nohow.’
Amongst the many charitable institutions which
Yarmouth boasts is the Fishermen’s Hospital, a quad-
rangular building near St. Nicholas’ Church. It was built
by the Corporation in 1702 at a cost of 621/. Since its
erection various sums have been bequeathed; these now
produce 492. 10s. per annum.
Seeing some poor old weather-beaten men basking in
the sun, I thought I would see what evidence they could
give me about the herring fishery when they were young.
I was fortunate enough to obtain evidence from Mr. Silvers,
aged 85, and from Mr. Colby, aged 71, who had both served
nearly all their lives as man and boy in the North Sea.
Tbe answer from both these veterans was, that there are
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 197
as many if not more herrings caught now than 70 or 80
years ago, and this in spite of the increased number of
boats and nets. I was very much struck with the manners
and appearance of old Mr. Silvers; in spite of his age,
hale, hearty, and contented, with a regular fisherman’s eye,
which no one accustomed to deep-sea fishermen can mis-
take. He told me some of his history which was as
follows :—
‘T was born in 1790, and have been a sailor and fisher-
man from a sprat to a whale ail my life. When I was
about thirteen years old I was ’prenticed to a cooper, and
after being with him some time, he sent me out for a short
voyage in a vessel he freighted, as I was a strong lad.
When I came back I went on larning my trade till I was
just seventeen. One cold winter's night in the year 1806
—Trafalgar was fought Oct. 21, 1805—I was a-standing in
a public-house in Yarmouth, called the “‘ Horse and Gig,”
with two other boys; a blind fiddler who was there was
just a-going to tune up for us, when in rushed the press-
gang and took the lot of us. We was took off in boats to
a man-of-war lying in Yarmouth Roads, and kept aboard
all night, and brought before the officers in the morning.
Those who had a protection were never kept, as there was
a law against it. A protection is this:—‘If you was
bound a ’prentice in those days to any trade, that pro-.
tected you from being taken ; for you was obliged to serve
your time till the seven years indenters was out.
‘That fiddler, he was let off at once, as, being blind, of
course he was no use; and my master, he come aboard in
the morning, thinking he could get me off as being a ’pren-
tice, but he happened to say I had been to sea in his
198 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
vessel, so the officers said that was enough, and I could not —
now be protected. I had six hours to go ashore and bid
my father and mother good-bye, and then I had to go to
my ship and serve in the King’s service.
‘I was away six years from old Yarmouth. A lot of us ©
was taken prisoner by the Danes; we were marched three
hundred miles through their country to the prison, where
I was thirteen months, almost starved I was. After being
there all that time, I was let go; the English admiral gave
up two Danish prisoners for one Englishman. Then I
joined my ship and soon came home. After that I went
away with Admiral Young in the Victoria. One day
when I was a-walking on the deck I see a gentleman a
beckoning of me, so I went up to him, and it was my old
master, Captain Hutchinson, who had a schooner of eighteen
guns called the “ Pigmy.” He said to me, “ Why, Silvers,
how ever came you here?” So I told him what I had been
doing; and he says, “ Well, would you like to come with
me, or stay where you are?” In course I said, “ Well,
sir, | would rather be with you than any one.” So he man-
aged with the admiral, and on I goes aboard the schooner.
We started for Gibraltar, and left there during the ’Meri-
can war, landing at Plymouth with the Government
mails. |
‘Well, I runned away that very day, and I went to
Exeter, from there to London, and then on to Yarmouth ;
but when I got here I was as bad off as ever, for the
pressgang was out, and I daren’t stop, or they’d have
nabbed me sure ercugh. So off I goes to Hull, and from
there I goes a fishing to Greenland for three years after
whales and ile. I know’d the pressgang couldn’t catch
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 199
me there anyhow. When I returned from Hull again the
’Merican war was over, and peace proclaimed, so I had
to remain in Yarmouth; and then I went out in fishing-
_ boats for owners, after herring. I have helped kill many
a whale. We used to get half-a-guinea a fish, and 50s.
per week. It will take the Arctic Expedition all their
time to get to the North Pole, and when they get there
there is nothing but ice and rocks. I never was higher
than 72° myself. But them press days was terrible, that
they was. Why, they once took our Mayor of Yarmouth
(he was a rum-looking old chap), when he was a standing
on the jetty. They didn’t care. One time a whole lot of
carpenters went together, and when the gang came ashore
the carpenters took and chopped the boats all to bits.
In course, they was took up, and sent to Norwich Castle.
When they was tried in London they was sentenced to
twelve months’ imprisonment in the castle, and one of
the poor fellows died there.’
Mr. Silvers showed me how he made tea, an ounce of
which lasted him a week in a general way. ‘ Gentlefolks
do not taste half the goodness of tea,’ he said; ‘ they
don’t boil it enough. Why, the tea-leaves that gentle-
men’s floors are swept with would make rare, beautiful
tea for me.’ Half a crown a week this old man lives on;
and he proudly said he did ‘ everything for himself, except
once in three weeks, when he gave a woman threepence
to “ lap up the water ” off the floor, while he scrubbed it
with a brush on the end of a pole.’ .
You see,’ he added, ‘I can’t go on my knees now, I
haven’t been active for twelve years, for I got a shot in
the leg when I was in the sarvice, and as I grew older I
200 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
felt it the more. The only thing I wish for is to have
some one come and see me sometimes. I haven’t a rela-
tion in the world; but I don’t wish to complain. I sit
here and read when I have anything, and a book that a
kind lady sent me I have read over and over again.
When I can’t do that I sit and think over old times, as I
do when I am restless 0’ nights. Please God, come next —
4th of August I shall be eighty-five, and a good deal have
happened in that time to think over.’
After leaving my old friend, I could not help thinking
of the old saying, ‘Not one half of the world knows how
the other half live. This poor old man in his lonely
home, with but comparatively few comforts, is far mo
contented than hundreds with every luxury. Not %
murmur does he utter, and not a wish to be better off,
but with his cheerful disposition and good heart sees, or
endeavours to see, ‘in each dark cloud a silver lining.’
Those who wish to have a real treat would do well
to take my advice and go ‘by Great Eastern Railway
to Yarmouth to inspect the herring harvest, which begins
at that port in the month of September. For some
days an increased number of tug steamers and smacks
may be noticed either coming in or going out of
Gorleston Harbour. These are the drifters bringing in
their fish from the great North Sea. These powerful
tugs tow the herring-boats alongside the Yarmouth
fish quay, and of all sights in England this quay is at
this season one of the most wonderful. The quay is
admirably built for the purposes it is intended to fulfil.
The merchants’ offices are all on one side, faced by a
solid stone pavement, with a road only intervening be-
“ . a
~ A 4 = ee ge,
ee a) ee a ee a
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 201
tween them and the Suez Canal, as I call that portion of
the Yare which flows past the town, and in which the
herring-smacks are brought alongside.
The market begins every morning in the season at ten
o’clock. Large bodies of men, as strong as lions, are em-
ployed in unloading the smacks. As the herrings are
caught at sea they are put down into the hold and mixed
with salt; arriving at the quay, they are sent up in bulk
on to the deck, and are there counted.
The counter takes two herrings in each hand and very
quickly puts them into the basket. The men get three
shillings a last for ‘ telling —that is, counting the her-
rings. Four herrings are called a ‘warp.’ From the
basket the herrings are emptied out into large baskets
called ‘ swills.’ Each swill contains 500 herrings of long
tale—that is, 132 for 100—a very ancient measurement.
A last of herrings contains 13,200 fish.
I found the pavement of the fish-quay almost covered
with these swills full of herrings, and it seemed wonderful
to me how ever they were going to be disposed of.
Presently a man comes along with a bell, and the fish-
buyers turn out to the place where the sale is going to take
place. The auctioneer takes his seat with each foot ona
swill, a red note-book and pencil in hand. He begins at
once, with his loud, cheery voice, ‘ What shall I say for this
lot?’ J see no sign and hear no bid! Somebody has
made a bid, for he begins most rapidly, ‘ Eleven—eleven—
eleven—eleven ; ten—ten—ten—ten—ten; eleven fif-
teen—thank you; look at ’em again—a splendid lot of
fish—don’t lose the lot for a crown; twelve—twelve—
twelve—at last twelve fifteen.’ The little pencil hits the
202 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
book, and the lot is sold—to whom, it is impossible for me
to say.
The purchasers stand round in perfect silence, but
though pretty quick in the eye I cannot see their bids.
A movement of the eye, a slight turn of the head, or
other mysterious sign incomprehensible to the public, is
quite enough for the auctioneer to take the bid. —
No sooner is one lot sold than he puts up another. I
give him a nudge, pretend to wind him up (on his great
broad back) like a clock with a key, and he puts on the.
steam in reality then; and the wonderful way and clever
chaff with which he leads on his bidders to buy is most
amusing, putting the famous auctioneer of our ancestors,
Robins, quite in the shade. The prices vary according to —
the quality of the herrings and demand in the market.
One lot was knocked down at 16/. 15s. for twenty swills.
The fish first out of the hold are the most valuable ;
those last out do not fetch so much money, as they are
salter. The herrings on sale were North Sea herrings,
very large fine fish. I examined the milts and roes, and
found they were not quite in spawning condition, but
very nearly so. A shoal was just then reported a few
points west’ by north-west, direct from Yarmouth, near
the Doggerbank.
The result of my earnest consultations at Yarmouth
enables me to classify the herrings somewhat as follows :
Spring herrings, long-shore herrings, midsummer her-
rings, and deep-sea herrings, the latter of two kinds. But
this is such an intricate question, I cannot go into it
here.
The process of curing is as follows: the swills full of
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 203
herrings are brought to the curing-house and turned out
on the floor; the men then mix them about with shovels,
while another man scatters salt plentifully over them.
The herrings are then placed in a heap and allowed to
remain a certain time, then washed in a huge tub, then
spitted (a process called ‘riving’). Spits are sticks per-
fectly round. The stick is passed through one gill; and
each spit, which carries twenty-five herrings when full,
is hung up on what is called a ‘horse’ fora time. The
fish are hung up in such a way that they can all be
stripped off very quickly. The smoking-house consists of
a large room; upon looking up to the ceiling may be seen
a great number of racks, called ‘grills;’ the space between
the racks is just the length of the spits. A man climbs
up to the very top of these racks, another places himself
halfway down, another man is on the floor, and the spits
with the herrings are passed from one man to the other,
and immediately hung up until the place is qnite full of
herrings suspended by their gills. Fires of oak and cak
sawdust are then lighted on the floor below. The oak is -
chop-and-lop from the forests, and is sold by the cast;
each bit of wood has a peculiar marking on it. Here,
again, we have a strange measurement: in the sale of
wood 1,000 stands for 600. The red herrings are smoked
six or seven weeks, to give them a good deep red colour.
During this process some fall off the spits; these are
ealled ‘plucks’ and ‘tenders,’ and are collected and
hung up again by the tail on what are called ‘tenter
baulks.’
Real Yarmouth bloaters are herrings very slightly
salted, and smoked for three or four hours only. In this
204 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
quickly taken off their spits and packed into barrels; a
small barrel contains 200, a large barrel 660. They are
packed with their heads outermost, and in order to save
room they are occasionally pressed under a heavy iron
screw, somewhat resembling the apparatus for making
cheese. The herrings cured at Yarmouth in this way
are mostly sent to the Mediterranean by fast steamers.
The question of salt is of great importance. That
which I saw was very hard, and in beautiful crystals
resembling snow. This salt came from Nantwich, in
Cheshire, and is brought to Yarmouth in steamers. —
After inspecting the curing-houses we calculated how ~
many industries must be put into action before the barrelled
process they puff up somewhat, hence they are called
‘bloaters.’ When the fish are quite prepared, they are
herrings leave Yarmouth. Thus: 1, boats and rigging,
&e. 3 2, nets; 3, salt ; 4, steam-tugs; 5, salesmen and staff ;
6, baskets and swills; 7, carrying carts; 8, washing the
herrings; 9, spits; 10, riving and hanging; 11, oak for
smoking ; 12, packing; 13, barrels; 14, freight, besides
employment to a vast number of smacksmen. Thus we
see of what importance red herrings are to Yarmouth,
and to how many people and trades they give employment.
Surely we English should be most grateful to Providence
for giving our country such a rich harvest of the sea. I
wish I could persuade some of our influential M.P.’s to
come down to Yarmouth and see the immense amount
of capital and labour involved in the herring fisheries.
We held our official inquiry at Lowestoft in the
‘Fisherman’s Shelter.’ This is a most excellent institu-
tion—a large wooden building with plenty of air and
a a a
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 205
light, roofed inside like a new church. There is every
accommodation for fishermen: excellent tables, good
seats, and, above all, good food—cheap, very cheap.
A man can get meat, bread, cheese, cocoa, tea, and coffee
there for a surprisingly small price. I myself had lunch
there off some capital American beef, that was really first-
rate. This institution is greatly, if not altogether, indebted
to Colonel Leathes, of Herringfleet Hall, for its foundation,
and the admirable way in which it is now kept up. The
fishermen can come in and out in their working clothes,
and get warmth, excellent food, cocoa, &c., much better
than they could at any public. In bad weather especially
is the Shelter patronised by these brave North Sea fisher-
men. Smoking is allowed, which adds greatly to its
success.
A curious fact which came to my notice at Lowestoft
is the acclimatisation of lobsters about the pier. Some
years ago a box full of live Norwegian lobsters, the pro-
perty of a local fish merchant, got adrift and was broken
up; there were in this lot several ‘berried hens,’ 2,¢., lobsters
carrying eggs under their tails. The lobsters escaped, and
have now permanently established themselves among the
rocks. This is a good hint to those who wish to try
lobster cultivation elsewhere, and there are many places
admirably suited for the experiment.
I saw that the teredo is making havoc with the wood
piles of some of the harbour structure. The rascals, in
spite of copper nails, get in and will scoop out the piles
till they become as hollow as chimneys. The fishing-
smacks going in and out of the harbour were beautiful to
see. A tug was continually going to and fro from the inner
206 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH.
harbour, saving the men’s time and labour by tugging 4
the boats either in or out. The quantity of trawl fish on
the quay was something amazing, and how it is that the
North Sea is not trawled out may be a wonder to many.
Still, we must recollect that if England was cut out of a
map and placed on the North Sea, drawn to the same scale,
England and Scotland could be sunk in the North Sea, —
and space still be left over. Again, supposing the trawling — ;
vessels to be represented by balloons, and the soles, &c., ;
by human beings, the ballooners would be a long time
before they could trawl up all the men, women, and
children in England and Scotland.
I think I have said elsewhere that a trawl net fished
almost immediately behind another trawl net would often
catch even more fish than the first net. I think this
might be illustrated by what I saw at Yarmouth. There |
was a wedding at the big church of the place, and when
the people saw the carriages going to the wedding they
all began to run after the carriages. During the wedding
the crowd assembled, and then came the trawl net, as
represented by the carriages, into the thick of the crowd
to take away the bride and bridegroom, and their friends ;
but the more carriages that came, picking up a certain
number of the wedding party from the crowd, the thicker
the crowd became.
I was,much amused at a large red-faced fisherman’s
reception of the bride; he established his monstrous self
right opposite the window of the bride’s carriage waiting
at the door of the church. He was dressed fisherman
fashion—tarpaulin hat and jersey. Move, not he! There
he stayed with his great ugly head right inside the
NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 207
carriage till the bride moved off from amid the charity
children, old women, babies, and the whole turn-out of
the poorer parts of Yarmouth, to whom a gratuitous
exhibition such as a wedding is a great amusement and
delight. |
Yarmouth fair happened to take place when I was
there. Of course I went into the shows. The best thing
by far was the Hairless Horse. Yes, he was perfectly
hairless, as bald as a billiard: ball. His hair had not been
shaved, he had never had any. Some part of the skin
was white, the rest black: the white was very white, like
the skin of a sucking pig; the black was the black of
the edible Chinese dog, also called the ‘ India-rubber Dog.’
_ There was also on view a living skeleton—certainly a
skeleton something awful to look at. He was said to be
thirty-four; he might have been any age. He was awfully
thin. His wrist would pass through a gauge of one inch
and one-eighth. I asked the skeleton what he lived on.
He said, ‘ Rump-steaks and porter.’ Anyhow, he certainly
did not grow fat on it. I went also to see a ‘ Petrified
Mummy,’ about which the showman of course had a long
yarn to tell. This was an old friend that I am continually
coming across at penny shows—viz., the ‘ Abogine.’ The
history of the ‘ Abogine’ is as follows: He is a dried
Australian native, thrown in as a bargain with some
shells, spears, &c., in a lot, and bought by a dealer. The
shells, &c., were sold, but not the dried Australian, and
the dealer got quite tired of his bargain. At last he
called him an ‘ Abogine,’ and chopped him to some penny
showman for some monkeys. The poor ‘ Abogine’ does
not get on; showmen can’t make money out of him. The
208 - NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. |
*
word has been a little twisted. i x.
There were a tremendous number of roundabouts in
the fair. Why the women, children, and men do not get
giddy and fall out of these model boats and rocking-horses,
I can’t tell. The sailors were great at the swings, and, I
must say, were sent up fearful heights, higher than ane
landsmen could or would go. | :
209
LONDON LIRDCATCHERS.
PiscaTor et Auceps visited in August 1878 my friend
Mr. Higford Burr, at Aldermaston Park, Reading. Pisca-
tor is myself, Auceps a professional London birdcatcher,
Mr. Davy, whose name is well known to ornithological
collectors both in London and elsewhere as a dealer and
as a first-class authority on everything pertaining to
British birds.
I proposed to Mr. Burr that I should bring Davy down
to Aldermaston, that the party staying at the house might
see the process of catching wild birds, an art about which
Londoners know but little.
Arriving at Aldermaston in company with the Squire,
Mrs. Burr, Sir Austen Layard, then Minister at Madrid,
Lady Layard, Dr. Hooker, Mr. Fergusson, &c. &e., we at
once started to pitch the net at a place selected by Davy.
He told the head keeper he wanted to find a place where the
birds came to drink; so, guided by the Squire with his big
walking-stick, we at once proceeded to the fish-house,
where the Squire breeds his great lake trout, in one of
the wildest parts of the forest. The forest at Aldermaston
is one of the most beautiful in that part of the country ; the
oaks in it are of very great antiquity, some as old, if not
older than those in Windsor Park. The Squire takes
P
210 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS,
great care of these venerable oaks, and doctors them up in a
their extreme age. Passing through the forest, it was in-
teresting to watch Davy, as he trudged: along with his
call-birds and net in ‘ the pack’ on his back through the
thick ferns, looking up into the trees, and giving dif-
ferent call-bird notes as he went on. His diagnosis of
the forest was not, however, very promising. ‘ Not
much here, sir,’ he said, ‘except owls and woodpeckers.’
And just at that moment, as luck would have it, a wood-
pecker began to holloa. ‘ Hark at him,’ he said; ‘that’s a
spotted woodpecker; there ought to be several kinds of
woodpeckers in this forest.’ ‘ Yes,’ said the Squire, ‘ there
are, and I never allow the keepers to shoot them under
any pretence.’ The Squire well knows how very useful
these unpaid servants the woodpeckers are in the manage-
ment of forest trees. 3
Just by a gate which led us through the high iron deer-
fence Davy suddenly halted, and said, ‘ Mr. Buckland, sir,
there’s an owl’s nest in that tree.’ ‘If there is,’ I said,
‘Davy, there should be some pellets at the bottom.’ So
the Squire and myself routed about among the grass, and
in a few minutes we found some eight or ten owls’ pellets.
These consist of balls which look like matted hair. After
the owl has eaten a mouse, he spits up the hair and the
bones in one mass, all the flesh being digested. I have
just dissolved out one (only one) of these pellets in water.
I find in it the almost perfect skull of a shrew mouse with
the most lovely little teeth, and also half the skull of a
common mouse. The bones of the shrew are indeed
most delicate. I know no other bone the structure of
which is so beautiful, and, at the same time, so light.
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. — 211
The Squire’s owls not. only keep down the mice, but at
night they give us a most lovely serenade, to my ears far
more interesting than the singing of any prima donna at —
the Italian Opera. ‘Should not wonder if there isn’t
some young owls in that nest,’ said Davy. ‘Up you go,
then,’ said I, ‘ and look.’ ‘There’s been young owls here,’
said he, after he had examined, ‘and I can’t tell, they may
be in the nest now,’ as he showed me a lot of the down of
the young birds. He then explained the proper way to
take young owls. The owl’s nest is often deep down in a
tree ; it is necessary to wait till the owls get to a certain
size; the best way then to catch them is to roll upa
stocking or ball of worsted, fastening on a piece of string
and letting it down into the nest; the birds immediately
turn on their backs and claw at the stocking ; they have
not sense to let go, and up they come.
The old oaks in Aldermaston Park are very favourite
breeding-places for owls, and the Squire does not allow
them to be shot.
The next morning, after breakfast, Mr. Davy reported
to the Squire and myself that he had been out very early
to see what the park produced in the shape of birds. He
reported numbers of thrushes, blackbirds, jackdaws, star-
lings, and rooks, but he had not seen a magpie. He had
heard one or two jays, abundance of green woodpeckers,
and a few of the summer soft-meat birds, such as
the flycatcher, willow-wren, chiff-chaff, and a common
shrike.. There was not a small seed-eating bird to be
seen either in the forest or the park. The only way
Davy could account for their non-appearance was that the
park and forest lands had been kept clear of seed-bearing
Ee
212 - LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
weeds. He was certain large numbers of all kinds of —
birds had been bred in the Squire’s forest and in the gorse, —
but having brought out their young they had now left for —
their feeding-places. |
The Squire gave Davy permission to lay his nets
wherever he chose. He selected a spot close to the end of
a most beautiful shaded avenue. The process of laying the
nets is somewhat as follows:—Two nets, twelve yards ;
long, and when open covering the ground for twenty feet in
width, are neatly laid down on the ground. To the far
ends of the nets are attached staves. The distance Davy
stood from the nets to work them was about eighteen yards. ©
It is impossible to describe the rough yet very excellent
machinery by which a pull on the rope held by the bird-
eatcher will make these harmless-looking nets instantly q
spring into the air and catch the birds, either on the wing
or on the ground. They act so quickly that the eye can
searcely follow. Anything on the wing crossing the nets
within four feet from the ground will be shut in instantly.
It is better to catch the bird before he has time to settle. If
birds touch the net with their feet they are off instantly.
The next process in birdcatching is to put out the
‘brace bird.’ A brace bird is taken from a cage; this bird
always wears his brace with a swivel attached, whether at
work or no. The brace consists of a piece of string made
into a kind of double halter. It is put over the bird’s
head, and the wings and legs are passed through; in fact,
when I saw Mr. Davy brace a bird I was strongly re-
minded of a nurse dressing a baby. When the brace is
- on the bird, the feathers fall over it and it cannot be seen.
The brace bird is then put on his ‘ flurr stick;’ this is a
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 213
straight stick, which by means of a hinge on its lower end
and a string is made to rise and fall at the will of the
birdeatcher. Then when any bird is seen coming the
flurr stick is gently pulled up, the brace bird all the
while standing on the stick is made to hover and to show
wing, 7.¢. flutter as though about to settle on the ground:
this, of course, is to attract the wild birds to the place.
Mr. Davy then proceeded to arrange his call-birds. These
birds when put out begin to sing, especially if they hear
another bird of the same kind in the distance. The wild
ones, being attracted by the decoys, are shown by the
brace birds the place where they are wanted to go. No
bait is used for the birds; they simply come to the decoy,
and imagine from the gall that they, the decoys,, are
feeding there.
The brace bird that Mr. Davy put on the flurr stick
had been at work for three years almost daily. He had
been the means of catching thousands of other birds, espe-
cially sparrows, ordinarily called ‘Jims.’ Mr. Davy says
the call-birds get very artful: sometimes they will give a
note of warning or fighting to the wild birds; thus a linnet
will set to hipping, that is calling ‘hip, hip, hip,’ several
times. This note of the eall-bird causes the linnets
coming in a flight instantly to dash away in all direc-
tions.
The goldfinch will oftentimes set to ‘ gidding,’ that
is, saying ‘gid, gid, gid, several times in succession.
This has the same effect as the ‘hipping’ of the linnet.
The birds are off in a moment. Mr. Davy’s call-bird
goldfinch was a very good one, and Mr. Davy put his
song into words. By listening attentively. I could make
214 ) LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
out that the goldfinch did really say the following words.
‘
There are two songs of the goldfinch ; one is—
Sippat-sippat-slam-slam-slam-siwiddy.
The other is—
Sippat-widdle-widdle-slam-siwiddy kurr-hurotle-chay.
Goldfinches are now becoming very scarce, because the
cultivation of land is exterminating the thistles. This
year, for the first time, the birdcatchers have gone for
them to Ireland, and have sent large takes of gold-
finches thence into the London market. During this
autumn goldfinches were more abundant; this may be
attributed to the provisions of the Bird Preservation Act.
At the end of the year the goldfinches lie up in quiet —
feeding-places, and remain there as long as the food lasts 5
they will not be seen on flight again until April.
The song of the linnet is thus written by Mr. Davy :—
Hepe, hepe, hepe, hepe
Tollaky, tollaky, quakey, wheet,
Heep, pipe, chow,
Heep, tollaky, quakey, wheet,
Lug, orcher, wheet.
This is the song of the wild linnet.
The toy linnet is a bird that has been taught to sing
by the titlark, woodlark, or yellowhammer; they are
educated at an immense amount of trouble. The linnet
is taught ‘ in-and-in,’ ‘in-and-in,’ ¢.e. by constant repeti-
tion; and only a very few take the perfect song. The
song begins thus :-—
Pu poy, tollick, tollick, eky quak,
E wheet, tollick, cha eyk, quake, wheet.
\
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. | 215
This is one stave of the song. Then follow in due
order the following staves :—
Phillip, cha eke, quake, wheet.
Call up, cha eke, quake, wheet.
Tollick, eke, quake, chow.
Eke, eke, eke, quak chow.
Cluck cluck, chay, ter wheet tollick, eke quake, wheet.
Echup, echup, pipe chow.
Ah, ah, ah! J-o-e.
Eke quake, chow rattle.
Tuck, tuck, wizzy ter wheet ;
Tolliky, quake wheet.
This is the finish of the toy linnet song. When the
above song is put together by a properly trained bird it
is just like a flute.
To get these birds to take the song they must be taken
from the nest very young, before they get the eall of the
parent birds.
Perfect toy linnets are worth almost any sum of money
—15l. to 201. would be given readily for a thoroughly good
one. Broken song-birds are only worth 30s. to 50s. each.
A broken song-bird will not make his stops in the song
as given above; he will run one stave into the other.
Good toy linnets are very scarce, and their trainers are
getting old and dying off.
Towards the middle and end of November the bird-
eatchers always expect what they designate the ‘ Novem-
ber flight of linnets.’ This great flight generally takes
place between the 15th and last day of November. The
men lay their nets before daybreak. As soon as it is light
216 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
the birds appear. They come in flocks of from two to
three hundred; the call-birds ‘charge,’ and give the
catchers notice that the birds are coming before they can
be seen by the men.
Very large takes of these migratory linnets have been
made; as many as five dozen have been taken in some
years at one pull of the clap-net. Although so many
linnets are captured annually, there has been no general
diminution noticed in their numbers. The greater number
of these birds are bred on the wild gorse lands, especially
in Scotland. They are very prolific, and have three to four
nests each season, producing from fifteen to twenty young.
When this linnet migration from the north takes place,
‘the birdcatchers are certain that some wild weather is
coming behind them. Observers will find this right. The
linnets when arriving at the south of England disperse
themselves over the stubbles, ‘ clover lays,’ and ‘ fed-offs ; ”
they eat large quantities of charlock and other wild seeds,
which otherwise would be injurious to the farmer. The
large takes of these birds in 1878 glutted the bird market.
Before the flight cock linnets were worth from four to five
shillings a dozen, they soon dropped in price to from
eighteenpence to two shillings.
Mr. Davy also had a bullfinch, and it was quite
wonderful how this bird would answer him at almost any
distance. The call consists of a low, plaintive, melancholy
whistle. If any wild bullfinch came within the call of this
clever bird he would never let him go away, but keep
continually working at him. This bullfinch is always
worked in an open-top cage, so that he can either be
used inside the nets or for birdliming purposes.
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 217
The best time for catching bullfinches is in the black-
berry time, viz. September and October. They also eat
privet berries and dock seed, but they never begin on the
privet berries until after the frost has touched them.
Birdliming is a more sporting mode of catching birds
than netting, and is thus practised. The bullfinch catcher
finds his game principally by his own call. He walks
along suitable lanes and margins of woods, continually
ealling with his mouth; this is called ‘whooping ;’ it is
the challenge or call-note of the bullfinch, and sounds very
much like ‘whoop, whoop, whoop.’ In some parts of the
country bullfinches are called ‘whoops.’ After a time the
man finds his game by a bird answering his call. He im-
mediately puts down acall bullfinch in a cage, and a twig
already limed near the cage. After atime the decoy ‘ gets
hold’ of the wild bird by his call; the man then ceases,
leaving the bird to finish his work. The wild bird, being
of a pugnacious disposition, challenges the caged bird, and
alighting on the stick he is done for immediately, being
held fast by the lime. It is not an uncommon thing for
a single-handed man to take two dozen bullfinches in a
day ; fresh-caught ‘ bullies’ realise to the catcher twelve
shillings a dozen for cocks and three shillings a dozen for
hens.
Cock bullfinches are in some parts of the country
ealled ‘soldiers,’ on account of their crimson breasts.
‘ Bullies’ are taught to pipe by being taken very young
from the nest, and having one tune constantly hammered
into their heads either by a bird-organ or by whistling.
_ Numbers of birds, however, will not take to the song
in spite of great attention being paid to their education.
218 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS,
The Germans are very clever in teaching bullfinches to —
pipe. A trainer would think himself very fortunate if
four out of twelve ‘ bullies’ became pipers: they are worth
three and sixpence each; a perfect piper is sabe from
three to four pounds.
The nets being spread and the birds put out, we
adjourned to the end of the ‘ pull-line,’ in hopes the birds
would come, and waited patiently. The silence in the
forest was very remarkable. Bully kept on answering
Mr. Davy when he chose to talk to him. Davy also talked
to the goldfinch and the linnet, and I think Mr. Davy ~
sings the linnet’s song better than the linnet himself. He
assists himself in trapping linnets by the use of a small
whistle. We waited most: patiently in silence for the
birds to come and be caught. But, as Mr. Davy anti-
cipated, nothing came to be caught, not even Jims (spar-
rows). At last a poor little robin was fool enough to
come: in an instant the nets were over him to show us
how they acted. Poor little Bobby was taken out of the
nets and handled most carefully, and was marked on a
feather by the Squire so that he should know him again.
I had the curiosity to put the robin to my ear to listen to
his heart. . The rapidity with which his poor little heart
was going was amazing ; it was perfectly impossible to count
the pulsations, the sound was like a locomotive letting
off her steam. This was caused by the sudden surprise
of the moment. Birds cannot change their faces or show
any symptom of alarm, or the Bobby would probably have
looked white about the gills.
The question has arisen if a robin could be brought to
talk. Mr. Keilich, the naturalist, tells me that he knew
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 219
of a robin who said, ‘ Pretty Bob; pretty Bob. Come and
kiss Bobby.’ But Mr. Davy says he has never heard of a
robin talking.
The blackbird is a great mimic, or rather mocking-
bird. If taken young he will go through one or two
songs. Davy had one that would whistle ‘ Pop goes the
weasel,’ and ‘ Hey, jim along, jim along Josey; hey, jim
along, jim along Joe.’ He would sing at any time at
command. Mr. Searle, my secretary, says he heard a
blackbird in the Mile End Road sing the principal parts of
the Huntsman’s Chorus.
If any one wishes to try the experiment of training a
blackbird, he must raise one or two young ones from the
nest. As a rule, two out of three will take the song taught
them. The blackbird is very pugnacious, and this is a
drawback to his being kept in an aviary with other small
birds.
Wormwood Scrubs was once a celebrated place for
catching birds, especially starlings. Mr. Davy has caught
there from two to three dozen at one pullof the net. The
nets must be laid so as to begin catching at dawn. By
eleven o’clock starlings are ‘fed up’ and are off; they go
for shelter into the woods, to get out of the heat of the sun.
Five or six dummies—+7.e. stuffed starlings—are placed
near the nets to attract the wild birds, and also one live
bird on a ‘flurr stick’ The autumn is the best time to
catch starlings. They are very artful. It is necessary to
‘take a cut’ at them—that is, pull the net sharp the
moment they get within reach of it. They will often
hover over the net, not making up their minds to go in.
This is the time to ‘cut them in.’ The birds about in
220 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
August, being mostly young, are not ‘up to the game ’—
that is, the net work—but they will very soon learn it and
get artful.
Starlings are extensively used for trap-shooting. The
price varies from five shillings to six shillings per dozen.
Directly after the breeding season Mr. Davy would take a
twenty-dozen order at two days’ notice.
Sparrows are also much used for shooting purposes.
Large numbers of them leave London after harvest and go
upon the stubblesto feed; by September there are hardly
any sparrows in London. They return again during the
winter months when ploughing begins. After many
have been caught and their number thinned they be-
come artful, and the moment they see the net they
ery ‘Jim, jim, jim,’ and are off. An old Jim is as
cunning as an old man, from seeing his pals so often
caught in the net. Sparrows are a great pest at the
Zoological Gardens, entering into the houses, and es-
pecially the warm houses in the winter. They are not
at all shy, but enter into almost all the houses where
the animals and birds are fed, helping themselves to the
most delicate morsels and luxuries. In the winter the
sparrows are caught by bat-folding. Bat-folding is
eommonly used in the country for catching all kinds of
birds. ,
Mr. Davy in his time has supphed large numbers of
gentlemen with pigeons (blue rocks) for trap-shooting.
These pigeons are bred in many parts of the country by
thousands in dove-cots, and bought up by the dealers.
Any kind of sharp-flying pigeon is also used when the
price of blue rocks is objected to. Blue rocks vary from
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 221
16s. to 24s. per dozen, common kinds from 12s. to 15s.
Davy has supplied twenty-two dozen or 264 birds a day.
After they are shot and brought home the birds will
always fetch 6s. per dozen. If in good condition there is
always a ready sale.
Pigeons are very pugnacious. If two cock pigeons are
put in a cage together, they will fasten on to each other
by the beak, and cut away with the wings until one is
completely mastered.
Scotch larks are abundant in England; they locate
themselves on the clover and grass lands, where they
are taken by thousands on dull nights with trammel
nets. At the beginning of the winter they are sold dead
indiscriminately, both cocks and hens, just as they are
caught. By the end of January the catchers can find
ready purchasers for the live cock birds. The price of cock
larks then rises monthly up to the end of April. In
January they fetch four shillings a dozen, in April there is
a ready market at twelve shillings a dozen.
Wood-pigeons are very numerous in the early winter,
and large numbers are then sent to the London market.
They are then in the very finest condition, and are regular
‘lumps of meat.’ They are very good for table when
stuffed with sage and onions and roasted like ducks.
When the severe weather sets in, the damage that is done
to the farmers by wood-pigeons is great; they destroy large
quantities of swedes and turnips, spoiling more than they
eat. These birds peck out the heart of the green part in
the centre of the turnip ; in doing this they make a deep
hole, the water then gets in, and the turnips are destroyed
by the first frost. In years when there are no beech-nuts,
222 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
the wood-pigeons make more inroads than ever among the
turnips. Wood-pigeons also do much damage to the vetches
grown for early lamb-feeding.
The siskins, chaffinches, bramble-finches, and haw-
finches that come in the Michaelmas flight, and locate
themselves where food is abundant, disappear before winter,
and the birdeatchers cannot find their whereabouts. In
all probability they will not show up again on flight until
the middle or end of February. Fieldfares, redwings, and
missel thrushes then arrive in large quantities, and are
to be found about the environs of London so long as they
ean get food ; they are very wary birds, but the moment
frost and snow set in they are easily approached. The
redwing of all the thrushes is the most duck-hearted ; he
will soon succumb to the cold, even when the berry food is
abundant ; he cannot exist long without ‘ground food,’
that is, worms and insects.
As it was very hot we sat down in the shade to rest,
while Mr. Davy gave us a yarn about his birds. It was
unusual for a thrush to be in song so late, viz., August 17,
as at this time these birds are in full moult. August, in
fact, is the dullest month in the year for song. Nearly
all the birds, being ‘sore in moult,’ hide away in damp,
shady places. Mr. Davy has put the song of most birds
into words. He repeated the words of a thrush’s song,
and I found by carefully listening that the bird does
actually sing the following words :—
Knee deep, knee deep, knee deep,
Cherry du, cherry du, cherry du, cherry du ;
White hat, white hat.
Pretty Joey, pretty Joey, pretty Joey.
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 223
My readers should learn these words by heart, and
listen to a thrush singing. They will find the thrush pro-
nounces the above words as nearly as possible. Repeat
them all, even when no bird is present, rapidly in a bird-
like manner, and see the effect.
It is very difficult to word a blackbird’s song. Mr.
Davy can imitate a blackbird’s song so well that he can
bring Mr. Blackbird up to him to be caught, but he can-
not put his song into words.
Having got on to the language of birds, Mr. Davy gave
us some more examples. I give his reading of the song
of the nightingale. The song is commenced in ‘ wheet-
ing and kurring,’ which may thus be written :—
Wheet, wheet, kurr, k-u-u-r-r-r.
The song after that continues,—
Sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet,
Jug, jug, jug, jug, jug,
Swot, swot, swot, swotty.
They keep on thesenotes a long time, finishing up with
‘swotting and kurring.’ The song must be pronounced
with great inflexions—crescendo-diminuendo, I think the
lady pianists call it ; especially modify the ‘ sweet, sweet,’
and pronounce it in a plaintive manner. The ‘jug, jug,
jug’ is quick, like a dog barking.’
1 The following note has been kindly sent me :—‘ The “ wild bird,”
whose liquid warble our Poet Laureate, in his “In Memoriam,” recog-
nises as characteristic of both joy and grief, had some two hundred
years ago his much-loved song reduced to words and letters by a
well-known and very learned Jesuit, Marco Bettini. This production
was at that time deemed a most successful one, but about a hundred
years ago a German naturalist named Bechstein made what many call
O24. ie LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. : F
I hear the peasants in Brittany translate the night-
ingale’s song thus :—
Le bon Dieu m’a donné une femme,
Que j’ai tant, tant, tant tant battue
Que s'il m’en. donne une autre ;
Je ne la batterais
Plus, plus, plus —
Q’un petit, q’un petit, q’un petit.
The wagtails have different calls. The call of the
black-and-white wagtail is ‘ Physic, physic, physic,’ quickly
repeated, and with a whistle Davy can make them come
close up. Listen to the first wagtail you hear, and you
will find he invokes the aid of the medical profession.
As there were no small seed-eating birds in the park,
Mr. Davy then gave us a lecture on birdlime. He first
of all gave us the process of makingit. There are two
ways of making birdlime The first is to get a quart of
linseed oil and boil it down to a little over half a pint.
The process of making it is dangerous. The oil gets so
an improvement on Bettini’s “Song of the Nightingale,” and I forward
you a copy of it :—
Tiouou, tiouou, tiouou, tiouou
Shpe tiou tokoua ;
Tio, tio, tio, tio
Kououtio, kououtiou, kioutiou, koutioutio ;
Tokuo tskouo, tskouo, tskono
Tsu, tsti, tsti, tst, tsu, tsti, tsti, tsti, tsi, tsti, tsti
Kouorror, tiou, tksoua, pipetk souis
Tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso,
Tsirrbading,
Tsi, tsi, si, tosi, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si,
Tsorre, tsorre, tsorre, tsorreki,
Tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsi
Blo, blo, blo, dlo, dlo, dlo, dlo, dlo,
Kouiou, trrrrrrrrretgt,
Su, su, su, ly, ly, ly, li, i, li, li’
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. | 225
-
very hot that a pipkin is obliged to be used. When boiled
down the oil must be poured into cold water, and is then
very apt to fly up in the face and scald baldly; the stench
of it is almost unbearable.
The birds principally caught with birdlime are gold-
finches, bullfinches, woodlarks, and chaffinches.
Mr. Davy told us he would make the other kind of
birdlime in our presence, if the Squire would allow him to
eut off a bit of holly bark from a tree. Davy chose a
thick old tree; he cut a piece about four inches square
from the outer bark, and divided it into three. He gave
the Squire one piece, myself one piece, keeping a piece him-
self, and told us to put itin our mouths and chewit. The
taste of the bark was of an agreeable bitter-—-the bitter
cup of the chemist’s shop. In about five minutes the
holly bark, being thoroughly crushed between the teeth,
began to be very tenacious, and in about ten minutes the
birdlime was produced. It is wonderfully sticky stuff, and
it is difficult to rub off the hands, and much more so off
the moustache ; in fact, at the end of the operation it was
difficult to talk. This, then, is a new discovery for the
Pharmacopeeia. It will be a capital thing for a lady or
gentleman who talks too much, if you can only once persuade
him or her that holly bark is a tonic which would do
them good. In about five minutes it would shut up
their chatter.
It is not an uncommon thing in London for clever
thieves to place a small portion of birdlime on a walking-
stick; the confederate then takes away the barmaid’s
attention, and the man with the stick takes the coin from
the bar. Another trick is to place a small portion of
Q
226 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
birdlime on a silver coin and give it to the barmaid, and
it is amusing to see how she tries to throw it into the till;
or, in fact, get rid of it out of her hands at all.
The birdlime we made from the Squire’s holly bark
turned out very good when it was quite finished. Davy
trinmphantly showed it to the Squire, and assured us it
would ‘ hold a duck or a parrot; he would not get away
unless his feathers came out.’ !
Mr. Davy had got to this point of his lecture when the
gong at the mansion sounded for luncheon, and of course
we went back at once. At luncheon I was obliged to give
an account of our morning’s proceedings, and we all began
to ‘talk bird.’ Sir A. Layard informed me that the
swallows leave Venice about St. James’s Day, July 25, and
the day after they leave the mosquitoes begin. He also
told me that in this year all about Verona the locusts came
in millions, devouring everything before them, and they
were followed up by vast flocks of the roller (Coracias
garrula), which devoured them in numbers. He also
said that when making his discoveries at and about
Nineveh the natives used to catch quail in a wonderfully
clever manner by throwing a casting-net over them.
He regretted we had not yet introduced the gigantic
partridge, the ourkakich, the royal partridge of the Per-
1 The following is a recipe for making birdlime. Peel off the bark
of the holly ia July, and remove the outer rind, the brown epidermis ;
put the bark into boiling water in an earthen vessel, and let it remain
about a fortnight in a damp place. Then take it out and bruise it well -
until it becomes a paste. This wash in cold water, to separate all ex-
traneous matters, and leave it for four days, when a sort of scum will
appear on the surface. Take off the scum, and the birdlime is fit for
use, and will hold a duck as firmly as the famed Polytechnic cement
does china.
a ee ee es ee eee ee a
LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 227
slans, or Caspian snow partridge. I also learned a new
plan they had in Madrid to turn birds into politi-
cians ; they dye pigeons various colours, and let them fly
when any fun is to be made or politicians are to be
annoyed. Doves are also dyed and turned loose when
any particular pruma donna sings at the theatre; the
doves being dyed with her favourite colours.
As the name Davy came into conversation, some one
asked what was the meaning of the sailor’s phrase, ‘ Davy
Jones’s locker.’ A gentleman present, who had been in
India, immediately told us, to our great delight, that
‘Deva Loka’ is the ‘Goddess of Death’ in Hindustani.
_ Some English Forecastle Jack must thave heard this ex-
pression, and put in the word ‘Jones’ to make it sound
right.
The best time for seeing the nets in full operation is
at daybreak on commons, waste lands, or seed-growers’
grounds. After ten o’clock in the morning the catching
ceases to a great extent, for the birds having fed ‘lay
up. Towards evening the birds again work the feeding-
places, but the birdcatchers have generally then left the
ground.
The captured birds are carefully taken out of the net
and immediately placed in cages called ‘store cages.’ The
doors of the cages are at the top, and made with the leg of
a stocking fastened on: a usual wooden door would not
answer, as the birds might slip out when fresh additions
were made. © All kinds of British birds, from a wren up to
a rook, can be taken in the pull net.
During ordinary weather the nets are worked by decoy
and ‘flurr birds’ on the open lands. During the hot
Q 2
. ye
228 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS.
weather the nets are worked on the margins of brooks,
lakes, or ponds. ;
Birds will go for miles to a clear-running, gravelly-
bottomed stream. An experienced catcher on passing a
suitable place can tell it immediately ; the signs are that
the shallow water on the edge of the pool is muddy, and
the tracks of the birds are visible in the mud. Birds fre-
quent the water for drinking, washing, and moulting
purposes about midday during the hot weather.
By this mode of netting, which is called ‘the water-
trap, many British birds which will take no notice of
call-birds are captured. Among these are taken the
black and white flycatcher, woodpecker, jays and magpies,
doves, wood-pigeons, blackcaps, butcher-birds, lesser and
larger pettichaps, thrushes, blackbirds, and all the titmouse
tribe.
oa
229
SIR WALTER SCOTT'S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD.
I MAKE it a rule invariably to buy the local guide-book
of every place I have to visit. When at Melrose, in
September 1879, on an official inquiry into the salmon
disease in the Tweed, I found to my delight in the guide-
book that Abbotsford, Sir Walter Scott’s residence, was not
very far off; so | made up my mind to go and visit it, as
there was just time so to do before our court began the
next day. I was so interested in what I saw, that I now
venture to describe the appearance of the home of this
illustrious Scotch baronet.
An old college scout at Christ Church, Oxford, one
‘Cicero Cook,’ held an aphorism that a man’s character
could be told by the books and surroundings in his study.
At Sir Walter Scott’s house, therefore, I expected to find
a reflex of the thoughts of the great novelist.
The house itself stands at the bottom of a steep de-
clivity which leads from the main road. It is built close
to the Tweed, and the Gala water falls into it just below.
The general appearance of the house is that of an old castle,
but built with modern stone, after a design suggested by
the antiquarian mind of Sir Walter Scott, who evidently
treasured up many things which otherwise would have
perished. For instance, the old Tolbooth, of Edinburgh,
230 SIR WALTER SCOTT'S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD.
having been demolished in 1817, the stones of the portal
were given to Sir Walter Scott, and rebuilt into a doorway,
which bears the following inscription :—
The Lord of Armies ts mp protector,
Hlessit av thay that trust in the Lor0.—_AADBLEFV.
I had to wait a few minutes in the ante-hall before
the guide came to conduct us over the house.
In this little room were several very curious prints,
especially a picture of a sea-fight, the ‘ Wolverine,’ Captain
Montague, taking some French luggers ; a desperate fight
between the Russian and Cossack cavalry, 1800; and a
procession in Edinburgh; also a trunk made of tiger-
skin, probably a present to Sir Walter years ago.
The first room we were ushered into was Sir Walter
Scott’s study, the furniture of which is left exactly as when
Sir Walter died.
The table on which he wrote is an old-fashioned affair,
but has many drawers and many wings, just the table to
suit a man who had a great many papers to deal with.
The arm-chair is covered with leather, the sort of chair
into which a busy man would delight to throw himself
back and think. Near the fireplace is a piece of furni-
ture made from portions of the Spanish Armada, with
this motto: ‘ Afflavit Deus et disipantur.’ The tables in
the dining-hall at Westminster School are made from
portions of the wreck of the same Armada. Allround the
room there are numerous shelves with books, and halfway
up the room a gallery with more books, very like what we
have at the Atheneum Club. It may be possible that
Sir Walter took the hint from the Athenzum, which was
SIR WALTER SCOTT'S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD. 23]
founded in 1824, and of which Sir Walter was one of the
first members. Behind the chair is a cupboard devoted
to Sir Walter’s pipes and sticks, and I was delighted to
find out that Sir Walter Scott smoked.
Among the books I noticed bound copies of the French
newspaper, the ‘Moniteur.’ I could not think why Sir
Walter had such a collection of the ‘ Moniteur’ until
Mr. Walpole, who was with me, told me he thought Sir
Walter Scott had bound them because they would cons
tain Napoleon’s bulletins, and were the official repository
of French despatches in those days. In return for his
kindness I told Mr. Walpole that I should be only too
pleased if I could find any book in the library relating to
his family, so I looked about sharp, and within five
minutes I caught sight of two—namely, ‘ Orford’s Works ’
and ‘ Memoir of Horace Walpole.’
The next room to the study, the drawing-room, is a
wonderful place. At one end of it stands an admirable
bust of Sir Walter by my godfather, Sir Francis Chantrey.
In a bay-window is a table containing many interesting
relics, as follows :— Portrait of James Stuart, born June 10,
1688, died at Rome, 1766. The purse of Rob Roy, also
the Skein Dhu (English, black knife or dagger) belong-
ing to Rob Roy. The tumbler used by Burns. Tam
O’ Shanter’s snuff-box. Napoleon’s portfolio, ornamented
with golden bees; this, if I mistake not, was presented
to Sir Walter by the Duke of Wellington, probably at the
time when he was writing ‘The Life of Napoleon;’ the
Duke’s autograph accompanies Napoleon’s portfolio. Saieee
I made a most careful examination of the ‘ castoreum,’
and afterwards a splendid preparation of it. The casto-
reum is secreted by two glandular bodies, each about an
inch and a half long. These I ascertained, by means of a
bristle, communicate with a pouch, which appeared quite
flaccid. I introduced a blowpipe, and was delighted tofind —
that there existed an immense pouch. The momentit was
full I cast it, so as to preserve its exact shape, and found
that when fully extended the pouch measured eleven and
a half inches long over the bend, and eleven inches round,
and would contain about a pint of water. I have not —
the least idea of the use of the pouch. The castoreum
itself is a resinous kind of secretion, and when burnt has q .
a highly aromatic odour.
Two kinds of castor are met with in the drug trade; —
the best is from Russia, Prussia, and Poland, but is now q
scarcely to be obtained. The pods are large and firm, and ~
their contents dry, of a red-brown colour, pulverulent, but 3
somewhat tough, of a strong and peculiar odour, and a
bitter, nauseous taste. The castor ordinarily sold is im- 9
ported from Canada. The podsare usually flatter, smailer, q
and moister than the former, and their contents so miscel- 4
laneous as to baffle all attempts at description. The 4
matter which they contain is commonly of a yellow or buff a
colour, of a resinous appearance, and a faint odour.
Sometimes it is soft, viscid, and fetid in the extreme; —
sometimes unctuous, and sometimes black and inodorous. 4
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 277
The yellow resinous kind is usually preferred, but it is
difficult to say on what grounds.
Castor has been extolled as a safe and effectual anti-
spasmodic in typhus, hysteria, and epilepsy; but its un-
certain composition and quality, and its extremely bigh
price, are objections to its use. Moreover, its virtues
are of a very doubtful description, and it seems uncertain
whether any real benefit has followed the use of the drug
in its most genuine form. It has been administered in
doses of from ten to twenty grains, the tincture is also
prescribed as an addition to anti-nervous mixtures.
As regards the use made of this castoreum by the animal
himself, Lord Bute made the following observations :—
‘Two of the animals were for a long time shut up ina
part of the battlements of the castle at Cardiff, where I
had a temporary pond built for them, and could watch
them very well, which I did. They would often come
out and sit upon the edge of the water, grooming their
coats with their fore-paws. The action was something
between a cat washing, and a monkey scratching itself.
They would scratch their heads, and then rub their faces
with both paws. The effect was extremely grotesque,
very much heightened by the creatures’ imperturbable
look of stupid gravity. On these occasions I always
observed a peculiar action, which I never doubted was
that of taking the castoreum on their paws and lubricat-
ing their bodies with it.’
In November 1874 a third dead beaver was sent me by
the Marquis, who wrote: ‘ Another of the beavers is dead.
It was seen quite well apparently, as late as Sunday morning,
when it was working at a tree which it had just succeeded
278 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS.
in felling. On Tuesday it was found dead. The only one, 4
therefore, which is, as far as I know, alive, is one of those
which eseaped to the moors. It is exceedingly provoking,
and to me quite inexplicable. The climate here cannot |
be worse than that of Canada; the inclosure in which
they were is very large, indeed, they never seem to have
visited six-sevenths of it; the variety of trees offered to
their ravages is very great, and they took to the alders,
and, to a certain extent, the oaks, quite freely. Perhaps
your post-mortem may enable you to give some solution.
I am very loth to abandon the effort to acclimatise
them altogether. I have just had a conversation with
the gamekeeper, who has taken much interest and trouble
in the matter. His opinion is, tirst, that the beaver which
escaped on to the moors is dead, as no new traces of
work appear; second, that the two French beavers were
too much domesticated, and accustomed to be fed, parti-
cularly with special food, such as bread, corn, willow bark,
&e., to be able to shift for themselves in a wild state; and
third, that if the American (and wilder) ones had not es-
caped, they would have lived; and that, with attention to
these points, one need not despair yet.’ _
The third beaver, which I was so sorry to find on my
dissecting-table, measured three feet three inches, and
weighed twenty-two pounds and a half. There were no-
marks whatever of external injury. On taking off the
skin I found there was little or no fat, and that the
animal was very much out of condition ; there was no food
in the stomach, but a quantity of gnawed vegetable matter
in the intestines. Knowing that the Marquis would be
anxious to have as much information as possible on the
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 279
cause of the poor beast’s death, Mr. Bartlett came down
to give his opinion. He considered, as we could find no
post-mortem appearances, except slight inflammation of
the lungs, not sufficient to account for death, that it was
possible that something had been wrong with the food
on which the beaver had been living. He feeds his own
beavers at the Zoological upon boughs of poplar and
willow, of both of which they are very fond. He also
gives them carrots, biscuits, and Indian corn.
The loss of these valuable animals was unfortunate,
their usual price being between seventy and eighty pounds
per pair.
In January 1875 Lord Bute obtained eight more
beavers through Mr. Jamrach. These eight beavers were
originally captured in North America, and were then sent
to Germany, where they were kept for three months in
a stable. Mr. Bartlett inspected the beavers with me
before their purchase, and we were satisfied they were
in good condition. As, however, the boxes in which they
were confined were very dilapidated through long travel,
and the weather excessively cold, we determined to give
them a rest, and allow them to have a good sleep and a
wash before sending them on to Scotland. Mr. Bartlett,
therefore, offered to take them in at the Gardens, and
turned them out into two beautiful dens close by the
wombats, just behind the kangaroo sheds. Having given
them a few days’ rest, I inspected them again. The
keeper turned them carefully out from their warm bed
of straw, at which they seemed exceedingly indignant.
The biggest of them, a very fine animal, sat up on his
haunches, and made a curious noise, something between
‘
280 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS.
a grunt and a growl. All of them slapped their tails
violently on the brick pavement, giving a sharp crack.
This probably is a warning signal in time of danger.
It is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the sexes —
of these animals. There were, however, two big ones, five
of a moderate size, and one very little one. They were all
sent to the Isle of Bute, via Glasgow. We advised that
a kind of pigsty should be made for them, in which a
warm nest of straw should be placed, and that they should
then be allowed to gnaw themselves out. If they could
find a better place to build their own nest in the open,
they would do so; if not, they would come back to sleep
in the nest which had been made for them. Thus they
would gradually be able to make themselves comfortable in
their new home. Their food should consist of Indian corn,
carrots, biscuits, and more especially willow boughs, of
which they are exceedingly fond, and without which they
will hardly thrive.
About the same time Lord Bute sent me the following
interesting and welcome intelligence:—‘ A very unex-
pected episode has taken place here with the beavers.
You remember that two of the original four escaped to the
moors, and though the body of only one of them was found, —
both were believed to have died. But itis not so. The
other animal has turned up in a large pond surrounded
with trees, close to a farm about one and a half or two
miles from where he had last been seen. His labours are
quite gigantic considering his size and his being alone. He
has felled a poplar with a girth of between three and four | 4
feet, and is taking it piecemeal to his head-quarters in a
swamp at the other end of the pond, where are already q
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 281
collected many large branches, almost logs. He seems to
feed eagerly upon the water-plants in the pond, which is
large, and altogether well adapted for his residence. The
whole thing is very curious, as showing that the creature
is able to live and flourish in a perfectly wild state in this
country.’
Companions were afterwards found for the solitary
beaver.
In September 1877 I was fortunate enough to have
the opportunity of examining Lord Bute’s beavers in the
beautiful home he had prepared for them. H.ML.S.
‘Jackal’ in her cruise anchored at Rothesay, and the
morning after our arrival, Captain Digby, the officers of
the ‘Jackal,’ my colleagues and myself, chartered a
carriage to pay a visit to the beavers.
-At some little distance from Mount Stewart House
there is a lonely pine-wood. Through part of this wood
runs a naturalstream. In the centre of the wood a stone
wall has been built, in such a manner as to keep the
beavers perfectly quiet and undisturbed.
As far as could be ascertained by the curator of the
beavery, there were twelve beavers. There were certainly
one or more young ones in the big house which these
most intelligent animals had erected. These when born
are about as large as rats; and from their size and other
observations the curator thinks that beavers have two
litters of cubs in the year.
On entering the enclosure one might easily imagine
that a gang of regular woodcutters had been at work
felling the trees all around them. Woodcutters had in-
deed been at work very busily, but they were not biped
282 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS.
labouring men working with sharp axes, but fur-clad 1
quadrupeds, armed by nature with one sharp,
powerful teeth.
The original stream, which flows gently down a slight
incline, is now divided out into one larger and two smaller
ponds, by means of dams or weirs, which the beavers have
built directly across the run of the water. }
It is difficult, if not impossible, to see these wonderful
dam-makers at work, as they generally, I hear, are out at
night, and are very shy beasts. From the structure they
have made, it is evident that they work with a design,
I may even say with adefinite plan. The trees have been
cut down in such a manner that they shall fall in the
position in which the beaver thinks they would be of the
greatest service to the general structure, generally right
across the stream. The cunning fellows seem to have
found out that the lowest dam across the river would re-
ceive the greatest pressure of water upon it. This dam,
therefore, is made by far the strongest. They seem to
have packed, repaired, and continually attended to the
tender places which the stream might make in their
engineering work. |
A fact still more curious—the custodian of the beavers
pointed out to us a portion of the work where the dam
was strutted up and supported by the branches of trees
extending from the bed of the stream below to the
sides of the dam—forming, in fact, as good supports
to the general structure as any engineer could have
devised.
The beavers’ hut, made by themselves, looks like a
heap of sticks or waste firewood, and presents nothing
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 283
_ to attract much attention. Of course I could not disturb
it, but it appeared to be composed of tree boughs and
barked sticks. In ‘Land and Water,’ March 28, 1868,
a drawing is given of the ‘beaver’s home,’ as seen by a
correspondent who had an opportunity of taking a beaver’s
house to pieces; here is his report. ‘The beaver’s home
looks like a huge bird’s-nest turned upside down, and is
generally located in the grassy coves of lakes, by the edge
of still-water rivers or artificial ponds, and less frequently
by a river side, where a bend or jutting rocks afford a
deep eddying pool near the bank. The house rests on the
bank, but always overlaps the water in which the front
part is immersed, and, as a general rule, the bottom of
the stream. or lake is deepened in the channel approaching
the entrance by dredging, thereby assuring a free passage
below the ice.’
He then described the architectural design of the
beavers’ house. It was a large house, nearly eighteen
feet in diameter at the water line, and nearly five feet
in height. ‘On the outside the sticks were thrown
somewhat loosely, but as we unpiled them, and examined
the structure more closely, the work appeared better, the
boughs laid more horizontally, and firmly bound in with
mud and grass. About two feet from the top we unroofed
the chamber, and presently disclosed the interior arrange-
ments. The chamber—there was but one—was very low,
scarcely two feet in height, though about nine feet in
diameter. It had a gentle slope upwards from the water,
the margin of which could be just seen at the edge.
There were two levels inside—one, which we shall term
the hall, a sloping mud bank, on which the animal
- x * *
¥ ‘ é - » 5 a.”
* X\
284 LORD BUTE'S BEAVERS.
emerges from the subaqueous tunnel and shakes himself ;
~ and the other, an elevated bed of boughs ranged round
the back of the chamber, and much in the style of a
guard-bed, 7.e., the sloping wooden trestle usually found
in a military guard-room. The couch was comfortably
covered with lengths of dried grass and rasped fibres of
wood, similar to the shavings of a toy broom. The ends
of the timbers and brushwood, which projected inwards,
were smoothly gnawed off all round. There were two
entrances ; the one led into the water at the edge of the
chamber, and let in the light; the other went down at a
deeper angle into the black water. The former was evi-
dently the summer entrance, the latter being used in
winter to avoid the ice. The interior was perfectly clean,
no barked sticks (the refuse of the food) being left about.
These were all distributed on the exterior, which accounts
for the bleached appearance of many houses we have seen.
In turning over the materials of the house I picked up
several pieces of wood of but two or three inches in length,
which, from their shortness, puzzled me as to the reason
of so much trouble being taken by the beaver for appa-
rently so small a purpose. My Indian, however, en-
lightened me. The side on whicha young tree is intended
to fall is first cut through—say two-thirds—then the other
side one-third a little higher up. The tree slips off the
stem, but will not fall prostrate, owing to the intervention
of branches of adjacent trees. So the beaver has to gnaw a
little above to start it again, exactly on the plan adopted
by the lumberman in case of a catch amongst the
upper branches, when the impetus of another slip dis-
engages the whole tree. The ovcupants of the house were
ws
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 285
out for the day, as they Panerai are Pen the
summer, being engaged in travelling up and down the
brooks, and collecting provisions for the winter consump-
tion.’ |
Mr. Bartlett and I closely examined the markings of the
beavers’ chisel-like teeth on the trees which they had cut
down. These trees were oak, larch, pine, birch, and willow.
The young ones, judging from the markings of their teeth,
‘arenot such good workmenas their parents, and one would al-
most imagine that it was necessary for them to go through
some sort of education in cutting down trees. It is very
interesting to observe how the beaver goes to work to cut
down a tree. Attacking one side, he cuts, by means of
his sharp chisel, a regular notch in the tree. One side of
this notch is flat, like a saw cut; the other side is brought
down to the saw cut by an angle; in fact, he cuts down the
trees by the same sort of incision as we ourselves employ
to cut a stick out of the hedge. Mr. Bartlett informs me
that he has seen the beaver put his head so far into the
notch that he was afraid the weight of the tree from above
would crush down upon him and smash his head; but Mr.
Beaver is a better carpenter than this. Mr. Bartlett has
seen him at this stage of the proceedings come out and go
toa little distance, sit on his hind legs, and inspect the tree
with the air of an engineer looking at a scaffold in process
of construction. When the beaver has gnawed his notch
as deep as he dare into the tree, the cunning fellow will test
its stability by standing on his hind legs and pushing the
tree, to see the degree of firmness of the portion which holds
the two pieces of wood together ; but how is he to separate
this bit which unites the wood? He simply leaves off
286 - LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS.
gnawing the big notch he has made. He then goes to
the other side, where the bark and wood have not been
touched at all, and gnaws away until down comes the
tree. |
The beavers are most industrious little animals. These
water carpenters have converted the place into a regular
subterranean city, for they have burrowed out the earth in
such a manner as to form streets, galleries, highways, and
by-ways. These runs, I imagine, are made primarily for
the purposes of safety, and secondly that the homes or dams
may be connected together, so that the families living
in the different huts may be able at will to visit their
friends. )
These animals were at one time very common in North
Wales. There is a valley running up from Bangor towards
Snowdon, called Beaver’s Hollow (Nant yr Afangewm).
The more modern name is Nant Frangon ; the river Ogwen
runs through the vale. There are several Llyn yr Afanges
(Beavers’ Pools) in different parts of the country; and
Giraldus Cambrensis, who wrote in 1188, says that beavers
were found in considerable numbers near one of the Car-
diganshire rivers. Hywel Dda made a law fixing the
price of the. Llost lydan’s, or broad-tailed animal’s skin,
at 120 pence, a high sum for those days, but we must
recollect that the skin of the beaver was one of the chief
articles of finery and luxury in dress that the Welsh then
possessed.
Mr. Kinahan, of the Geological Survey of Ireland,
wrote me thus :—
‘Some Irish lake-basins may possibly have been formed
by beavers’ dams. This suggestion, however, is merely con- ~
LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 287
jectural, and prompted by the form of some of the lake-
basins. Against it is the fact that although the beaver is
known to have been an inhabitant of Wales during the
historical period, yet we have been unable to find in the
Trish annals any record of its existence. . . . There does
not appear to be any real native Irish word for beavers.
In O’Keelly’s dictionary we find “ Dobhran-leasleathan, a
beaver,” but he seems to have taken this from the Scotch-
Gaelic, as no mention of beaver is known in any Irish MS.
Dobhran means water-animal, and leasleathan broad-tailed.
The Welsh for beaver is similar, namely llostlydan, broad-
tail.’
As regards the existence of beavers on the Continent,
my late learned friend Signor Valetta informed me that
Dante (who died 1321) mentioned beavers as then existing
in the Danube. He called them bevero, and implied that
they eat fish. The Italian name is now castero. Signor
Valetta wrote me thus :—
‘Dante mentions the beaver in Canto xvii. of ‘ Inferno,’
as a comparison with the assumed posture of Geryon
(a monster represented by mythologists as having three
bodies and three heads), on the precipitous bank of the
infernal abyss. Dante and Virgil have arrived on the
border of a dismal unfathomable chasm which falls
straight to the Well of Giants, and hence to the centre of
the earth. As the bank is steep, and there is no practi-
cable descent, and descend they must, Virgil bids the
poet ungird himself of a rope which tied his waist, and
give it to him. This rope was symbolical of penance,
humiliation, and repentance, being the rope worn by
the Franciscans, to whose society it seems the poet was
288
* LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. Sor ;
affiliated. Virgil throws the rope down the abyss, and a
at this bidding the monster comes up to carry them down, 4
and waiting for them places his claws on the bank, and —
swings with the hinder coil in the air. Here comes the —
comparison :—
Come tal volta stanno a riva i burchi,
Che parte sono in acqua, e parte in terra ;
E come la tra li Tedeschi lurchi
Lo bevero s’assetta a far sua guerra ;
Cosi la fiera pessima si stava
Su Vorlo, che, di pietra, il sabbion serra.
which may be thus translated :—
‘« As sometimes boats are so placed as to stand part
in the water and part on shore, and as there amongst the ©
glutton Germans the beaver sits down to wage its war, in
the same way sat Geryon.”’
Then Mr. Valetta says that the commentator on Dante,
Brunone Bianchi, affirms ‘that the beaver sits down
to wage his war against fishes,’ and all other commen-
tators follow in his track, from which it is evident that
the commentators aforesaid, although doubtless very
learned classical scholars, were certainly not naturalists.
The beaver is not a fish-eater, never was, and never will
be. He is a typical rodent or gnawing animal ; his incisor
teeth are formed like chisels to cut down boughs; his
molar teeth to eat vegetable substances only. Itis about
as sensible a thing to say a beaver eats fish as to describe _
a rabbit or a guinea-pig eating fish. Dante himself, when 3
he had finished this line, was evidently puzzled to write
what the beaver was waging war against, and showed
LORD BUTE'S BEAVERS. 289
his discrimination in not affirming a fact of which he
was not cognisant. This mistake about the beavers
eating fish has been lying dormant for about six hun-
dred years, and it is pretty nearly time that the mistake
should be rectified.
290
REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A RED DEER IN
WINDSOR PARK.
His Royal Highness Prince Christian has been kind enough
to allow me to place on record an event which I believe to
be unique in the annals of forestry, viz. a curious cata-
strophe to one of the red deer of Windsor Park, which will
be of the highest interest to all owners of deer parks,
whether at home or abroad, to the proprietors and lessees
of Highland shootings, to naturalists, and the public in
general.
It may be remembered that in January 1879 we had
some very severe weather, with snow and frost. On
January 16, one of the keepers who has charge of her
Majesty’s deer in the royal domains, was going his rounds,
when, to his great amazement, he suddenly came upon the
scene represented in Fig, 2, namely, a magnificent red
deer lying on his back, with his leg tightly fixed in the
forked branch of a whitethorn tree. This unfortunate
animal presented the following appearance:—He was
lying on his near or left side, the tip of his right
shoulder was supported against the trunk of the tree.
The chest and fore-part of his body were clear of the ground,
suspended by his right or off-foot, between the fork of the
tree. A closer examination showed exactly what we see
WUVd POSGNIM NY PVIS V OL LNAGIOOVY—ZG SITY
Fe ee
eZ
FE
} = eae
Se ee MW LS eae ee Si;
==
oe yp | 1) \\
A
7
292 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A -
in Fig. 3, except that the body of the animal is (in the
engraving) no longer attached to the foot. The keeper
attempted to remove the foot, but found it so tightly —
fixed that with all his force he was quite unable to do so.
The appearance of the stag’s foot was as follows:—The —
shank bone was fractured and splintered diagonally. The
fractured bones had made their exit by acut right through
the skin, thus causing a compound comminuted fracture.
The portion of the bone below this fracture—tough and
strong as the red deer’s shanks are—was shattered into
minute fragments the size of dice, The bone was again
fractured at its lower part, and the thick skin entirely —
lacerated through. The large sinews at the back of the
bone, as well as the wire-like sinews that work the toes of
the foot, were elongated and pulled out, and in fact
everything was broken right off except two very slender
sinews and a small portion of the skin. The total length
of the portion of the deer’s leg caught in the tree was seven-
teen inches; from the fracture to where it was torn off,
eight inches. The leg was caught by the branches of the
tree about four feet from the ground, and the lowest boughs
carrying leaves were about nine feet from the ground.
The deer was dead, and it is not known how long he had
been held a prisoner by his foot.
As there were no eye-witnesses of the occurrence, it
becomes somewhat difficult to account for this extraordinary
event. It is probable, however, that in consequence of
the weather the animal was short uf food, and that in his
wanderings he had observed above his head something
edible on the lower branches of the thorn tree, perhaps
leaves, moss, or lichens, on which deer feed in snowy
RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. 2uD
weather ; or possibly some ivy, of which deer are very fond.
There was some ivy on the tree about nine feet from the
FIG. 3.—FORE-LEG OF THE STAG CAUGHT BY FORKED BRANCHES
OF A THORN TREE.
ground, and the forked branch which caught the deer’s
leg was four feet from the ground, so that he could not
294 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A
reach the leaves when standing onall-fours. He therefore
probably raised himself upon his hind legs, and when
stretuhing himself upwards and forwards, the hoofs of his
hind legs slipped from under him ; or else, when letting
himself down again, his right fore-leg slipped suddenly be-
tween the forked branches of the tree, and was instantly held
there tight. (See again Fig. 3.) The animal then probably
began immediately to struggle, but the more he kicked and
fought the tighter the wrist of his foot got wedged in; in
fact, when the preparation was brought to me the foot was
so tightly fixed into the notch of the tree that it could not
have been more jammed if it had been hammered down,
and then a long screw passed right through it.
In his struggles to get loose (he was a fine, heavy stag,
carrying antlers with thirteen points) the first thing that
happened was the fracture of the leg-bone. This allowed
the animal to fall on his back, from which position, of
course, he could not rise. Terribly alarmed at what had
happened to him, the poor stag then began to pull and
tug at his captive leg, assisting himself to do so by means
of his horns. In his frantic exertions to get free the stag
a second time broke his leg, then the skin gave way, and
lastly the large tendons. If his strength had lasted long
enough to have ruptured the two small tendons it is pos-
sible that he might have escaped, leaving his leg in the
fork of the tree. The head of the poor beast was a little
further round the tree than represented in the drawing, so
that it would seem the unfortunate creature had tried to
use the butt of the tree as a lever to wrench off the frac-
tured part of his leg, and so escape with his life. He did
not, unfortunately, succeed in the attempt.
RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. 295
His Royal Highness, having been informed of the acci-
dent, judiciously ordered the portion of the tree which
held the foot to be sawn off bodily. He then kindly sent
the whole thing to me, with the request that the foot
should be preserved for him without being removed from
the fork in which it had been so tightly jammed by the
animal itself. ¢
This being a very difficult problem in the art of taxi-
dermy, I first of all had a drawing made of it by Mr.
Berjeau, and then sent for Mr. Keilich, whose name is
well known as a talented stuffer of deer’s heads, lions,
tigers, and, in fact, all the larger animals. By a most
ingenious plan Mr. Keilich managed to prepare the stag’s
foot, keeping it exactly in the position in which it was
found ; it was then set up in a case and was forwarded to
his Royal Highness at Cumberland Lodge, Windsor Park,
as a unique specimen.
I have been unable either by search or by questioning
to find any record whatever of a similar accident having
been known to occur toa red deer, or in fact any other
kind of deer. The nearest approach to it is the case of
‘locked horns, which are not so very uncommon. Red
deer in the fall of the year, as we know, are great fighters,
and at that time their horns are more or less elastic.
When the deer are fencing at each other the branches of the
antlers are apt to slip and get fast knotted, as it were. In
1866 I examined a very fine pair of locked horns of the
common American deer at Mr. Leadbeater’s establishment,
then in Brewer Street. In the Royal College of Surgeons
there are a pair of locked horns of the Canadian elk,
found just as they are, the wolves having eaten up the elks
296 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A
themselves. An instance of locked horns occurred at Up
Park, Petersfield, in 1866, when two deer were found with
their brow-antlers forcibly wedged together, hooking on
as tight as steel springs. The keeper was sent for, and
one of the hooked brow-antlers was sawn off, and the deer
liberated. There is a preparation of this kind of locked
horns in the new museum of the University of Oxford, and
similar cases are not unknown to deer-stalkers and foresters
in Scotland. If I recollect rightly, the late Lord of Lovat
had a fine specimen in his collection.
I have received several notes from correspondents on
the above curious accident. One writes :—
‘I am sure many others have seen, as I have done, a
fallow buck jumping a considerable height up into the
boughs of a whitethorn bush, and tossing his antlers about
among them, thereby bringing to the ground a lot of
haws, on which he makes a pleasant repast; it seems
almost certain that the poor stag was going through the
same performance, and as he could jump higher than the
fallow buck, his leg might be caught in his descent,
without much blame to his sagacity or to the activity of
his nature.’
Another tells me of a somewhat similar accident to a
dingo at a station in Port Phillip, Australia, One of the
shepherds killed a kangaroo at some distance from his hut,
and to secure the carcass deposited it across the boughs
of a gum tree, some six or seven feet from the ground.
‘From the base of this tree, and at a slight angle from the
trunk, a good stiff sapling had sprung up. On visiting
the spot the next day the shepherd was surprised to find
‘a wild dog jammed between the sapling and the tree, and
- RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. 297
quite dead. It had evidently made a spring for the dead
kangaroo, missed its aim, and slipped into the angle, the
elasticity of the sapling holding it tightly by the middle.
Neither of its feet touched the ground, but the bark of
both tree and sapling had been gnawed away in every
direction within reach of its ugly tusks.
I have also been told of a curious accident to a pony
in apark. In attempting to leap a wire fence, its foot
became fixed between the upper and second wires, causing
it to turn a complete somersault. Its neck was quite
doubled, and death ensued in a few minutes, either from
suffocation or a broken neck.
A strange accident happened to old Fanny, the fishing
mare (mentioned in a previous article), when she was a
three-year-old. In the field where she then was, two trees
grew very close to each other. She got her head. fast
between them about eight feet from the ground, and was
very nearly strangled before she was got out; the blocks
from the mill had to be fetched to hoist her out bodily.
She was fast for about an hour, the field being half a mile
from the mill. Noone saw how she got fast, but it was sup-
posed she had been trying to reach the leaves, or playing.
A somewhat similar accident not unfrequently happens
tobirds. Blackbirds and thrushes are sometimes found
caught by the head in the forks of bramble bushes, the
accident having occurred when the birds were fighting.
At the Surrey Gardens a fine ostrich was once killed in
the following curious way :—The bird got his head into
the space between two wooden oak palings ; finding himself
entangled, he gave a sudden kick, the effect of which was
to pull his head right off,
298 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A RED DEER.
No man would have sympathised with me more in the
examination of this singular accident to a royal stag
than my late friend John Keast Lord, F.Z.S., Naturalist
to the British North American Boundary Commission,
who wrote one of the best books in the English language
on the art of travel, namely, ‘ At Home in the Wilderness ’
(Hardwicke, 1867). Lord had twenty years’ experience as
trapper, hunter, and naturalist, east and west of the Rocky
Mountains. He tells a terrible story of a lumberer or
woodcutter having been caught by the foot in a tree which
he was splitting with wedges. The lumberer was standing
on the log driving in wooden and iron wedges with his
ponderous mallet.
Lord writes :—‘ Soon a yawning crack opened along the
log, and in a brief space it would have been in two, but by
some mischance the man slipped, the wedge sprung instantly,
and allowed the crack to close upon his foot. Having tried
every means available to free himself, but in vain—shout-
ing he knew to be useless, as there was no one within hail,
and night was coming on, and he was well aware that the
bitter cold of a northern winter must end his life long
before any help could be reasonably anticipated—in his
agony of mind and intensity of bodily suffering, with mad
despair the poor fellow seized the axe, and ata single chop
severed his leg from the imprisoned foot.’ He managed
to crawl home, but unfortunately the accident proved fatal,
as in the case of the deer.
r %
299
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND,
Francois LEcompTE, the late ‘keeper of the seals’ at the
Zoological Gardens, was quite a noted character in his
way. My first introduction to Lecompte was at Cremorne
Gardens in 1866, where he had been engaged to
exhibit a sea-bear which he had captured in South
America, :
The district along the east coast of South America,
especially the coast of Patagonia, seems to be the head-
quarters of the seal family, many of these being of gigantic
size.
The following is the history of the capture of this cele-
brated seal, and of Lecompte’s début as tamer of sea-
bears and sea-lions :—
In 1862 some French sailors, wandering about the
desolate and bleak shores near Cape Horn, came across the
seal, or sea-bear, whose portrait I now give. After a
great deal of manceuvring, one of the men, Lecompte,
managed to get behind the seal, and catch hold of his
hind flippers. The seal, of course, tried to turn and bite ;
but his captor, by turning to the right or to the left, kept
out of the way of his teeth.
When the beast was a bit tired, the other sailors
managed to get a stick into his mouth, and to tie it tight
Lara os, Te %
‘SNACUVYN IVOIDOTIOOZ AHL LV ‘SVEd-VES AHLI—'P ‘DL
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND, 301
behind his head, so as to gag him. They then bound
him up tightly with ropes, and slinging him between two
oars, Lecompte and the sailors carried him to their ship,
and then to Buenos Ayres. Lecompte conceived the idea
of taming his captive, and for two whole years devoted
himself entirely to this object, in which he at last perfectly
succeeded, not, however, without great difficulty, for he
bore to his grave marks of the seal’s teeth on almost
every limb, and his right hand was quite crippled by a
bite, in which the seal almost severed the muscles of the
fore-arm ; in fact, the wound was so severe that the South
American doctors, wanted to amputate his hand alto-
gether.
Notwithstanding the ferocity of his pet, Lecompte
cultivated his intelligence, and the creature soon performed
tricks which Lecompte, with true nationality, worked up
into a little military episode. The sea-bear volunteered
to goas a soldier to Mexico. He then passed through the
forms of enlistment and drill, and finally fired a cannon.
The sea-bear was exhibited in Belgium before he went to
Cremorne. His dinner consisted of twenty-five pounds
weight of fish daily. His habit was to sleep all night, and
during the day when his master was not with him. He
awoke at the slightest noise. He did not object to visitors,
but was annoyed with ladies wearing white ribbons.
Lecompte was next. engaged bya travelling menagerie.
The affair did not pay, so they turned out Lecompte
and his sea-bear into a field by the road-side. Here
he was discovered by Mr. Bartlett, who purchased his
sea~bear for the society, while he himself was made the
keeper.
302 ' LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND.
_ When the sea-bear died, Lecompte was sent to the
Falkland Islands, and he returned with another in August
1868. This was a female captured by Lecompte him-
self.
Tecompte’s great. triumph was his taming the sea-
bear. The pas de deux with Lecompte and the sea~
bear, which took place on the chair in the middle of the
pond at the end of the platform, is well known to the
public, and the photographs of these performances will now
become historical.
If ever there was affection between animals and men,
it was the mutual love that existed between the seals at
the Gardens and Lecompte; nor do I think it was en-
tirely cupboard love, though undoubtedly the basket of
fish more or less influenced their ideas. He had names
for his seals at the Gardens, and the seals knew their
names—at least, Kate and Fanny did.
Lecompte was most careful about fish-hooks; the
fishermen who catch whiting, haddocks, &c., often cut off
the snood and leave the hook in the fish, and unless he
opened the fish to remove the hook, the seals would
swallow hook and all, and would be nearly sure to die
when the fish was digested, and the hook remained in
the stomach.
Lecompte’s abode was in a little house by the zebras.
I frequently had lunch with him. He was a splendid
cook. He once gave me a portion of a most savoury
pie, which he assured me was a spécialité. It was very
good, and I ate it; but when I came to know what the
spécialité was, I vowed I never would lunch with Le-
compte again without seeing the menu first.
Pee
FRE OTRAS OF
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 303
He took the greatest care of the little baby bladder-
- nose seals, and also of the larger specimens of the bladder-
nose which Captain Gray caught and presented to the
Society. |
In May 18731 received a message that two seals had
arrived from Dundee for the Brighton Aquarium. I sent
for Mr. Lawler from Brighton, and we both went to the
docks to meet them. Wecalled at Jamrach’s on the road,
to ask him to lend usa den to put them in. We found
the seals on board the steamship ‘Anglia’ in the docks
used by the Dundee ships. They were simply on deck,
and only kept from going about the deck by two boards.
They were pretty little things, very fat and chubby, pro-
bably about six weeks old. They had been caught in the
Arctic regions, and brought to Dundee by Captain Gre-
ville, of the ship ‘Camperdown:’ there they were then
transferred to the ‘ Anglia,’ and brought to London. We
_ put them into a box, having cut holes in the top, and took
them on a cab to London Bridge. I stopped at Billings-
gate and bought 20 lbs. of live eels for them. They
arrived at Brighton quite safely, and soon got accustomed
to their new home; but there was some difficulty at first
about their food, as they would not eat the eels or any-
thing else. Mr. Bartlett, however, with his usual readi-
ness, suggested a mode of feeding them which eventually
proved a success.
I had scarcely got these seals all right at Brighton,
when I received a telegram from Captain Gray that he
had caught a young bladder-nose seal for me, and that
it would arrive in London at nine o’clock the next
morning. Punctual to the time the van arrived from the
304 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND,
railway. I found the little animal was in a kind of crate,
evidently put together by a ship’s carpenter.
The seal looked very seedy, tired, and cold, so I took
him upstairs and put him before the fire, covered him over,
and let him have a sleep for two hours. He would not,
however, eat nor drink, although I tried him with live eels,
milk, and water.
In the course of the day Mr. Bartlett called, and
offered to take charge of him; soI sent him up to the
Gardens, where he was placed under the care of Le-
compte. Finding he would not eat, Lecompte caught
him by the flippers and attempted to get a portion of
eel down his throat, but did not succeed. While Le-
compte was holding him he made a terrible noise, some-
thing between the cry of a child and the growling of a
dog.
He was only a baby, I should say about six weeks old;
the teeth were not very large, but rather formidable; the
eyes, which were black, were deeply sunk into the head; the
bladder on the top of his nose was just visible ; his colour
was a yellowish buff. He stayed a very long time under
water, though so young; and when he brought his head to
the surface of the water his countenance was very human,
not unlike the face of a chubby-faced baby; and I can easily
understand the origin of the story that seals were once
human beings, namely, the Egyptians that were drowned
in the Red Sea, and who were for further punishment
converted into seals.
The last long interview I had with Lecompte was
when the sea-lions for the Brighton Aquarium arrived at
Deptford, in October 1875. Lecompte assisted to pack
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 305
the seals at London Bridge Station. It was very in-
teresting to hear Lecompte talk to the animals. They
were very frightened and very travel-worn. ‘ Vous ne
connaissez pas encore votre papa, mon petit. Restez tran-
quil, mon cher. Vous avez faim? Je vous donnerai un
poisson, voila.’ Lecompte on this occasion did not look a
bit like Lecompte. Whenon duty inthe Gardens, he was
generally dressed in a blue serge sailor’s dress. When he
went with us to Brighton he had got himself up quite a
swell; his handsome face and white beard made him look
quite a gentleman, which he really was by nature. He
was one of the best ‘talkers I ever knew; he would say
the commonest things in the most funny manner, During
the journey down the sea-lions cried nearly the whole way,
and Lecompte tried to pacify them by paternal exhortations
in French: ‘Ah! vous criez aprés votre papa, mes chers
phoces.’ Lecompte remained two or three days at the
Brighton Aquarium, in order to reconcile the seals to
their new home, where they long flourished. The sea-
lions of the species exhibited at Brighton inhabit islands
off the coast of San Francisco; their characteristic form is
shown in the engraving on the next page.
Lecompte originally was a French man-o’-war’s-man.
He gained, by his welcome ‘ Bon jour, Monsieur,’ and his
polite conduct, the respect of all visitors to the Gardens.
His loss was greatly felt, not only by ‘mes pauvres bétes,’
but also by the public in general. So anxious was he
for the welfare of his seals, that he requested when
very ill to be taken to see them once more. During his
illness he received his full pay, and was attended by the
first medical men in London. Peace to the memory of
Mm
*"WAIaVNOV NOLHYIGTG AHL LV SNOII-VAS AHI—'G “DIK
———— S
= ee => ae
=
ere a=
—_—>
Se i il a
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 307
this faithful servant and sincere friend of dumb animals—
dumb in the ordinary sense of the word to most people,
but possessing a voice and language well understood by
their much-lamented master, Fran¢ois Lecompte.
I received from the Rev. Mr. Lory, of the Falkland
Islands, the skull of a large sea-lion, now in my Museum.
It weighs eleven pounds, and measures from nose to the
end of the skull fifteen inches: it has evidently been ex-
posed to the action of the weather for a considerable time
—may be for many years. The skin remains over the
anterior half of the skull; the rest of the bone is bleached
by the weather. The teeth are exceedingly beautiful,
the largest being larger than the canine teeth of a lion,
only not so pointed. Mr. Lory wrote me thus :—‘ The
sea-lion’s head I have sent to you for your Museum
is from Port Stephens, in the West Falkland Islands.
The sea-lion is one of the hair seals (the male); his mane
is thick and bushy, and his roar terrific. He measures
from twelve feet to thirteen feet in length, and sometimes
more. During the breeding season he is exceedingly
fierce, and will attack a man; at other times he avoids
him. A parishioner of mine named White had his thigh
severely lacerated by one. The wound bled profusely, but
from good attention he recovered, only to meet with a
watery grave afterwards. They breed on the north coast
of the East Falkland Islands, and in the Jasons; and during
the season the lions keep jealous guard over the females,
which are quiet, inoffensive animals. The captain of a
schooner in the Falklands told me that he and his men
suddenly came upon from eighty to a hundred of these
monsters in the Jasons, which immediately made for the
Xe,
~ 308 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND.
water; and as the men intercepted their path they were
obliged to defend themselves as well as they could with
their clubs. The rush was tremendous, but the lions were
more frightened than the men, who, as you may suppose,
were rather taken aback by such an unlooked-for recep-
tion on a desolate island. Sea-lions are not easily killed
by a club ; indeed, I believe the usual way of killing them
is to shoot them with ball cartridge.’
Dr. Murie, author of the most scientific monograph on
sea-lions that has ever been published, wrote me as to
this specimen :—‘ Your. specimen is undoubtedly an old
male; the changes in appearance from the younger to
the older stages, and the differences between the male
and the female, are very curious. There are, so to say, five
grades of development. First, the brain region in the
baby is preponderant. Second, the face begins to
lengthen. Third, the teeth acquire importance; and in
this stage sexual distinction becomes evident in the skull,
although there is still a considerable resemblance between
them. Fourth, notably differs from the preceding, the
bones becoming more massive and rugose, sexual character-
istics being marked; crests then rise. Fifth, as the
skull ripens to old age, particularly in the male, all the
characteristic points of the fourth stage are carried out by
excessive growth of processes, crests, and other superficial
developments of bony lines, spicules, and nodules. The
cavity of the eye looks forwards; the space behind for the
temporal and other jaw muscles enlarging as fleshy bulk
preponderates over brain character.
‘It follows that all the aforesaid changes are an exact
counterpart of what obtains in the gorilla. In early
.
|
|
|
|
LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 309
youth the brain is functionally predominant. The teeth
assume importance, with a corresponding facial accession.
Lastly, whereas brain enlargement is apparently arrested,
the muscles of mastication, those of the throat and neck,
indeed, all connected with the head, and_ therefore
involved in the organs of offence and defence, paramountly
swell in bulk and strength; nerves and_blood-vessels
augment proportionally. Thus, from the featureless skull
of the young is evolved the rugged, immense, brutal, and
terrible-looking sea carnivore, peculiar to the male of this
and certain other genera of the eared seals.
‘The animal to which your skull belonged is not the
elephant seal (Morunga), and is a very different animal
from those exhibiting at Brighton, but belongs to the
same species (Otaria Jubata) as the earlier specimen and
some of the later ones which the Zoological Society
possess.’
In 1875 Mr. John Willis Clarke gave a lecture at the
Zoological Gardens on Sea-lions.! He says concerning
the species to which this skull belongs :—‘ The canines
are of enormous size, and the two outermost incisors
of the upper jaw only a trifle smaller, so that when the
jaw is closed, and the lower canines fall between these two
enormous teeth, anything that may happen to come
between them is held as in a vice. The molar teeth are
so solid that sailors have mistaken them for flints. A
quantity of pebbles are always found in their stomachs.
The sea-lion is covered all over with coarse stiff hair.
Under the lower jaw and on the back of the head and
neck it is rough and shaggy. Beneath this hair is a crop
' Contemporary Review, December 1875,
310 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND.
of under fur, distributed in delicate, short, fine hairs. Old
males develop a mane. The skulls, which are picked up
on the shore of the Falklands, are sometimes half as large
again as those of the largest living sea-lion. The male
does not attain his size until he is about six years old.
There are nine well-authenticated species of sea-lions. In
the North Pacific three, viz. Otarva ursina, O. Gillespu,
and O. Stelleri. Inthe South Pacifie two—O. Jubata and
O. Falklandica. At the Cape of Good Hope, O. Pusilla
or Antarctica. On the coasts of Australia and New
Zealand, O. Hookeri and O. Lobata. At Kerguelen’s
Island, O. Gazella.’
The sea-lion, to which when alive the skull sent me by
the Rev. Mr. Lory belonged, must have been indeed a
gigantic creature, possibly as big as a moderate-sized horse.
Allied to these huge seals, but excelling nearly all of
them in bulk, is the walrus (Zrichecus rosmarus), a
denizen of the Arctic regions, remarkable for its great
tusks and bristly whiskers. The males are twelve to fif-
teen feet in length. The illustration of the walrus, and
those of the sea-bear and sea-lion, show three of the most
characteristic of the seal tribe.
It is not often that the walrus comes down so far south
as the coast of Scotland. The following notice from a
correspondent, therefore, is worthy of record:—‘I have
heard, to my great surprise, that a gentleman of undoubted
credibility and intelligence had during last summer seen
off the west coast of the Isle of Skye a large walrus.
Having occasion to visit the island, I was fortunate
enough to meet the gentleman who (with two friends)
saw the animal, and had the account direct from himself.
a
‘SOUIVM FHHL—'9 ‘D1
312 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND.
The date of the walrus’s visit to Skye was, so far as my
friend could remember, about the 20th of June 1878.
He was seen lying on a rock near the shore on a fine calm
evening, and my informant and his friends were able to
get near enough to remove all doubt as to the identity of
the animal, with which they were familiar from plates or
stuffed specimens. The huge tusks were quite easily
distinguished, and the length of the animal was estimated
at about seven feet. On being disturbed he rolled over
into the sea, swam a short distance to another rock, and
clambered on to it, apparently using his tusks to aid him
in doing so. After some little time he took the water
again and was seen no more.’
eet SR ORME IRC iy cas
313
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
THERE is something very attractive to the human mind,
whether educated or not, about the word ‘ Whale.’ It
may be that man, knowing his own inferiority of size and
strength as compared to many gigantic animals living
either on the earth or in the water, and also on the ommne
ignotum pro magnifico principle, looks upon the whale
as the very embodiment of size and strength. Again, it
is not impossible that our earlier impressions of Divine
power may have been obtained from whales being so fre-
quently mentioned in the Bible, especially in Gen. i., in
which whales are the first created animals mentioned by
name, thus—‘ And God created great whales.’ Then,
again, everybody knows the story of Jonah :—‘ Now the
Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah, and
Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three
nights.’ On turning to Johnson’s Dictionary we find evi-
dence that in his day the science of natural history had
not very much advanced, for the learned lexicographer
defines a whale as ‘The largest of fish; the largest of
animals that inhabit this globe.’
Whales are of the highest interest to the public—not
only in a scientific point of view, but also because their
value is of commercial importance to this nation. In former
314 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
times, with the exception of the celebrated Scoresby, but
few persons placed on record anything relating to the ~
structure and habits of these huge oceanic mammalia ;
and even now a great field of inquiry is open to those
whose duty it is to hunt the leviathan of the deep amid
the icebergs and frozen seas of the Arctic Ocean.
I am proud of the friendship of a gentleman who has
of late years done more than any other person to give the
public information relative to the fauna of the far-distant
North—the whales and the seals. This gentleman has
spent twenty-two whaling seasons at the North Pole, and
each time he has returned from his perilous voyages he
has brought us back some interesting news from his hunt-
ing-grounds. I need hardly say that I refer to Captain
David Gray, of the steam whaling-ship ‘ Eclipse,’ of Peter-
head, Aberdeenshire. In the course of one of his recent
voyages Captain Gray has made a discovery relative to the
structure of the baleen or whalebone whale (Balena
mysticetus), and to its mode of feeding, which to the best
of my belief has hitherto been entirely unknown, and
which will doubtless excite great interest among all
naturalists.
The following is Captain Gray’s description of the head
of a Greenland whale, with sketches and measurements
taken during his voyage in 1876, showing the manner in
which the whalebone is arranged in the head :-—
‘Fig. 7 shows the mouth open, and the position of the
whalebone when the animal is feeding; it is drawn to
scale, and is a good representation of its appearance. It
will be noticed that I have not filled in the correct number
of slips of whalebone, which amount to about 300 on each
‘avel IaMoy ‘ad | 9UOG-UMOID “VY
‘NGdO HLOOW ‘YNIGHAd SI CIVHM GAL NOHM GNOQAIVHM FHL JO NOILISOd—) “DIA
316 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
side of the head, but have only drawn a few lines showing
the direction they take towards the lower jaw when the
mouth is open. I counted the number of blades of whale-
bone in a whale’s head last voyage, and found 286 on the
left and 289 on the right side of the head.
‘Along the middle of the crown-bone the blades of
whalebone are separated from each other by three-quarters
of an inch of gum, but the interval decreases, towards the
nose and throat, to a quarter of an inch. The gum is
always white; in substance it resembles the hoof of a
horse, but is softer. It is easily cut with a knife, or
broken by the hand, and is tasteless.
‘The whalebone representing the palate is lined inside
with hair, for the purpose of covering the spaces between
the slips, and preventing the food on which the whale
subsists from escaping; this hair is short at the roof of
the mouth, but is from twelve to twenty inches long at
the points of the whalebone. The reason of this is that
when the mouth is opened the bone springs forward, and
the spaces between the slips are greatest at the points.
‘ Hitherto it was believed that the whalebone had room
to hang perpendicularly from the roof of the mouth to
the lower jaw when the mouth was shut, but such is not
the case. The whalebone is arranged, as will be seen
from the sketch, to reach from the upper to the lower
jaw when the mouth is open; were it otherwise, the
whale would not be able to catch its food; it would all
escape underneath the points of the whalebone.
‘ Fig. 8 shows the position of the whalebone when the
mouth is shut. The dotted lines show the jaw-bone, and
the black lines show the whalebone curving towards the
“mel IaMoy ‘a& £ aUOG-UAOLO “V é
SULVId HHL ‘LAHS AIVHAM JO HLOAOW—'8 “OIA
a
“MVE YAMOT AHL JO NOILOV AHL Ad AVMV GuaMoVd ANOGAIVHM AO
‘
318 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
throat. It is not very correctly drawn, but it will be
sufficient to show the arrangement which allows room in
a cavity or hollow in the lower jaw for the points of the
whalebone to lie in when the mouth is shut. The whale
has no muscular power over its whalebone, any more
than other animals have over their teeth. When the
animal opens its mouth to feed, the whalebone springs
forward and downward, so as to fill the mouth entirely ;
when in the act of shutting it again, the whalebone being
Fig. 9.—SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH SHUT.
C, crown-bone; G, gum; WB, whalebone; T, tongue; L, lips;
JB, jaw-bone; J, lower jaw.
pointed slightly towards the throat, the lower jaw catches
it and carries it up into the hollow befure described.
‘Fig. 9 is a cross section cut halfway between the
blow-holes and the nose along the line aB, showing the
mouth shut, and the arrangement of the lips, jaw-bones,
tongue, and whalebone. It will be best understood ‘by
looking at the explanation given with the drawing.
‘Fig. 10 is the same section showing the mouth open.
It conveys a good idea of the great capacity of the mouth
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 319
when open compared with the comparatively small space
_it has to hold the whalebone in when the mouth is shut.
FiG. 10.—SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH WHEN OPEN,
‘Fig. 11 is the whale that these measurements were
taken from, drawn by a lady, and is the best representa-
tion of the Balena mysticetus that I have ever seen.’
The dimensions were as follows :—
ft. in,
Length from nose to tail welt <0
Length of head from nose to eye . hall icon Bs)
Breadth of body between the fins . , ae clest)
Breadth of head across the jaw-bones . foe ad
Breadth of lip, including jaw-bone ; wie
Gape . , ‘ ' é eee Cine
Breadth of tail . : ; pene
Length of whalebone . ; ercherna!
A i ten. yt
“peaytojog ,‘osdrpog , drys oy3 jo ‘Kvay pravq ureydep Aq portry
SVES GNVINEAAD AHL AO (snza0ushw vuxppg) AIVHM ANOGHIVHM— TI ‘DIT
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 321
- The problem hitherto unsolved has been the exact
manner in which the whale works his plates of baleen. The
result was known, but not the modus operandi. This is
the discovery made by Captain Gray. From his paper and
diagrams it will beceme evident that when the whale is at
work catching his food in the sieve-like, hair-lined mouth,
the baleen is extended to its full length along the whole
row of the plates. In pictures of whales, the beast
is always depicted with an open mouth, but surely the
whale does not always keep his mouth open! But then
the question comes, how does he shut it? and when he
shuts it, what does, he do with his baleen? How does
he pack it away? Gray, after careful examination of
many whales, has found out how this is done. When the
whale closes his lower jaw, he first gently pushes backwards
and upwards towards the palate the anterior plates of
baleen ; the posterior plates go back under pressure in
succession, till all the plates of baleen lie back in the
mouth, packed beautifully in regular order, one over the
other, over the angle of the eye. The bundle of hairs
from the tips of the plates of baleen fit into a hollow at
the edge of the jaws.
I have not the least hesitation in stating that the
description of the mode in which the whale packs away
his baleen when he wishes to close his mouth is entirely
new to the scientific world; and I challenge all comers
to account for this wondrous mechanism by the doctrine
of development or self-evolution. No; itis a proof—a new
proof, at the head ofa long catalogue of other evidences, ab-
solutely unerring and true—that the structures of animals
are not due to the causes which this doctrine would assign
MS
322 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
to them, but to the omniscience of Him who on the fifth
day of the Creation completed a wondrous work:—‘ And
God created great whales, and every living creature that
moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after
their kind: and God saw that it was good.’
On hearing of this discovery Professor Flower wrote
as follows :—
»* Captain David Gray’s observations upon the position
of the whalebone in the mouth of the Greenland whale
are quite novel, and of great interest. .They arose, as
the captain tells me in a letter just received, in conse-
quence of a conversation which ‘we had together a few
years ago, while looking at the skeleton of the large whale —
mounted in the Museum of the College of Surgeons. I
asked if he could explain what had always been to me, as
to others who have never had Captain Gray’s opportunities
of observation, a great puzzle, viz. how it was that the
whalebone was so much longer than the space which it
occupied in the animal’s mouth, supposing the blades to
be placed, as usually represented, at right angles with
the long. axis of the jaws. This difficulty occurred in
looking at all the authentic figures, such as Scoresby’s,
in which the height of the head is far too small for the
length assigned to the whalebone on the supposition
stated above, and equally in looking at the actual bony
framework of the head. Captain Gray’s explanation that
the slender ends of the whalebone blades fold backwards
when the mouth is shut, the longer ones from the middle
of the jaw falling into the hollow formed by the shortness
of the blades behind them, as seen in the side view, is
perfectly clear and satisfactory. It shows, moreover, how,
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES, 323
whether the mouth is shut or open, or in any intermediate
position, the lateral spaces between the upper and lower
jaw are always kept filled up by the marvellously con-
structed hair-sieve or strainer, which thus adapts itself to
_ the varying condition of the parts between which it is, as it
were, stretched across. If the whalebone had been rigid,
and depending perpendicularly from the upper jaw, when
the mouth was open a space would have been left between
the tips of the whalebone forming the lower edge of the
strainer, which, as Captain Gray justly remarks, would
completely interfere with its use, although the stiff wall-
like lower lip, closing in the sides of the mouth below,
might have the effect of remedying snch a contingency to
a certain extent; at least, it would do so if the whalebone
were short and firm asin the Finners. The function of
this great lip in supporting the slender and flexible lower
_ ends of the blades of the Greenland whale, and preventing
them being driven outwards by the flow of water from
within when the animal is closing its mouth, is evident from
Captain Gray’s drawings and explanation. The whole appa-
ratus is a most perfect piece of animal mechanism.
‘Captain Gray’s evidently truthful drawing of the Green-
land right whale is an acquisition to science. What is, how-
ever, really wanted to convey an impressive idea of the huge
size and extraordinary conformation of this animal is an
accurately prepared model of life size, constructed under
the direction of one as conversant with its appearance as
Captain Gray. Mr. Buckland has shown by his invaluable
casts of the smaller Cetacea the best way of exhibiting the
external appearance of such animals. It is greatly to be
wished that they, or similar specimens, may some day
x 2
324 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
find their way into the National Museum of Natural His-
tory,and may be supplemented by the more colossal species,
as the sperm, Greenland, and great fin-backed whales.
We have done all that we can with the space at our dis-
posal at the College of Surgeons, in exhibiting skeletons
of them and many of the smaller species of this most
interesting order of animals; we must look to the new
museum at South Kensington to do the rest.’
The mechanism of the whale is admirably suited for the
conditions in which he is destined by the Creator to live.
He wears a great-coat several inches thick—literally wm
his skin ; that is to say, the cuticle, or scarf-skin, is very
thin and highly polished, like a well-polished boot ;
the skin itself consists of cells, which are filled up with
fat.
This fat, unfortunately for Mr. Whale, is very valuable,
not only for burning purposes, but also for dressing jute, a
flax-like material, which, when dressed with oil, assumes a
lustre not unlike silk. With this jute are made carpets,
curtains, and ladies’ chignons. Jute is also used in the
adulteration of black silk dresses. Ladies who are pur-
chasing black silk dresses can detect the presence of jute
by burning. If the fibre is true silk, being animal, the
smell will be of burning animal substance; if it be vege-
table, the scent of the burning material will be something
like that. of burning cotton.
The whale has apparently neither arms nor legs: but
his two front fins are not fins, they are hands; if the skin
be dissected off they will be found to contain five regular
fingers, all in one case—imagine the human hand ina
hedge-cutter’s glove, and you have the model of the
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 325
whale’s paw. He does not use these paws for prehension
or touch, nor, I believe, at all for swimming; they simply
act to balance his weight in the water, and assist him in
steering himself.
We now come to his tail. Among nature’s beautiful
works three mechanical forces may. be said to take pre-
eminence: firstly, the stroke of a lion’s paw; secondly,
the kick of a giraffe; and thirdly, the stroke of a whale’s
tail. The whale’s tail is not only its sole weapon for
defence, but is its chief organ of motion. It is stated that
whales can go through the water at the pace of twenty-
five to thirty miles to the hour. The least of these speeds
would send them six hundred miles a day, or from 60°
north lat: to 60° south lat. in twelve days.
Though the usual colour of the whale on the upper part
is shiny black, the fore-part of the body underneath and part
of the lower lip are pure white, and the under part towards
the tail, slate or lead coloured. I do not quite understand
why the right whale should wear a black coat when he has
to bear a temperature of such intense cold. His cousin,
the beluga, wears a white coat. Here, then, is a problem
to be solved; but depend upon it there is a good reason
for the diversity of colour in these two whales’ coats.
The whale is a capital diver, but the time occupied
in his diving depends upon his business, whether feeding,
playing, or travelling. He is said seldom to remain at
the surface to blow longer than ten minutes, during which
period he blows eight or nine times; he then descends for
five to ten minutes; sometimes, when getting his dinner,
for fifteen or twenty minutes; when harpooned he will
stay under water fifty minutes.
326 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
‘When whales are harpooned,’ Captain Gray writes,
‘and there is no close ice in the immediate neighbourhood
that they can go to for protection, their usual custom is
to dive until they reach the bottom. They seldom go
beyond a depth of seven hundred fathoms, and remain
under water on an average fifty minutes, appearing again
near the same place where they were harpooned. They
then fall an easy prey to their pursuers, being so much
exhausted from dragging such a weight of line, and by the
great pressure they have been subjected to so far below
the surface.
‘Should a whale escape, and be again harpooned, it
never commits the same mistake, no matter how many
years may have elapsed ; it always sets off as fast as it ean
go along the surface, and is very difficult to take, often
tearing the harpoon out of the blubber, or breaking the
Jines. Scoresby says that “a whale’s brain is only equal
in proportion to the three-thousandth part of its body,” but
they have a very good memory nevertheless.’
Constituted as are the lungs of human beings, it is im-
possible for men to stay with impunity very long under water,
but in a lung-breathing animal, such as the whale, we find
a wonderful provision for the storing of the blood. At
the back of the lungs, between them and the ribs, is a vast
plexus of blood-vessels, which retain the blood when the
beast is under water, and cannot or is afraid to come up
to breathe. In our own veins there are very complicated
and beautiful valves, well worthy the attention of engineers
who have hydraulic works to manage. Professor Owen
first pointed out that the veins in the whale are remark-
able not only for their capacity, but above all for the
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. = 327
almost total absence of valves. The fact is of the utmost
importance to whalers, inasmuch as it enables them, with
such comparatively small weapons as the harpoon and
lance, to kill such an enormously large animal as a whale.
‘The non-valvular structure of the veins in the Cetacea,’
says Professor Owen, ‘and the pressure of sea-water at the
depths to which they retreat when harpooned, explain the
profuse and deadly hzmorrhage that follows a wound,
which in other Mammalia would be by no means fatal.’
As an instance of the ease with which whales are some-
times killed, Captain Gray thus relates the capture of
one :—‘ It was struck close to the ship during a thick fog
witha strong gale of wind blowing, and surrounded by aclose
and heavy pack ; a more unfavourable state of matters could
hardly be. The whale took out seven lines, or eight hundred
and forty fathoms, and stopped taking any more. The lines
were made fast on board, and allowed to hang for ten hours
before commencing to haul them in. At the end of them
was a whale of the largest size, and all that was holding
her was a single wire, one-eighth of an inch in diameter.’
On the other hand, the immense power of the whale
is sometimes exerted with fearful effect. To show the
great strength of a full-grown whale, I will quote the
following description of the capture of a big whale by
Captain Gray and one of his crews :—
‘We were at the time nearly close beset, there being
only a small space of water at the floe edge ; many whales
were passing through it. One of them was harpooned,
and went off so fast that the harpooner failed to get a
turn of the lines round the bullet-head before the boat s
lines were all run out. The bullet-head is an oak post
328 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
placed in the bow of the boat, on to which three or more
turns of the line are put to help to drag the whale. The
“second boat’s lines soon followed, but a very heavy strain
was kept upon them. Two boats’ lines were then attached
to the end of the lines run out, so as to hang a heavier
strain. ‘They were also taken out, and other two boats
bent on their lines, and the boats’ bows lashed up to the
ice to prevent them from being dragged under. One more
line was taken out from each of the last boats, equal to
two and a half miles.
‘The whale by this time had reached the other side of
the fioe. Men were sent over the ice with lances, and
succeeded in killing him; but before he gave in he broke
the lines in the dying struggle. Fortunately for us, it was
the line nearest the whale that gave way.. He proved a
valuable prize; his blubber measured twenty-two inches
thick along the back.’
The bones of the whale are very peculiar. They are
neither hollow, as birds’ bones, nor marrow-containing, as
our own bones, but composed of a series of cells. These
cells are very porous, and contain more or less oil. Ina
section which 1 have lately made of a whale’s arm-bone,
the structure is well demonstrated, especially the binding
up, as it were, of this cellular bone structure with an ex-
ternal coating of bone as solid as that forming the leg-bone
of anox. J understand from Captain Gray that the bones
from the whales killed are in no way utilised, the reason
being, I suppose, want of space on board ship. —
There is one bone, however, in the whale which is of
exceeding hardness; this is the ear-bone. Now, it isa very
remarkable thing that the whale should be in all senses so
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 329
strictly mammalian except as to one point, and that is the
ear. The reader should look in the head of the next cod,
haddock, or other fish he has for dinner, and he will find two
very hard ivory-like bones. These bones are the hearing
bones of the fish. The fish hear by means of vibration in
the water. The whale also lives in the water, and therefore,
by a most beautiful adaptation of means to ends, though
purely mammalian, he has, under the special conditions of
his existence, the ear-bones of a fish. These ear-bones are
not unfrequently found fossil in Suffolk. They are called
ceteolites.
When a huntsman goes in pursuit of an animal, he
must of necessity acquaint himself with the machinery of
offence, defence, or escape, with which the animal he
is in pursuit of is endowed. The whale, as I have men-
tioned, has great powers of hearing. These poor perse-
cuted brutes doubtless by this time have found out that
whaling-ships are their deadly enemies, and keep a sharp
look-out. The vibrations caused by the screw of a steamer
would of necessity be heard through water by the whale
at a great distance; therefore it is advisable, if it is desired
to get near the whales, to take up the screw and use the
sails only. |
It is the law of nature that all Mammalia should have
seven vertebre in the neck. A giraffe has a very long neck,
to enable him to pull down the lower branches of the palm-
trees on which he feeds, but he has only seven cervical
vertebre. The whale is also mammalian, therefore he
must have seven cervical vertebrae, and so we find he has.
When seen in the carcass the whale seems to have no
neck; he has not the same necessity as land animals
330 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
for moving the neck, but, for all that, he requires neck-
bones of some kind. We find, therefore, that the seven
cervical vertebrae are flattened—in porpoises very much
flattened—and appear like seven penny pieces soldered
together. I have a beautiful preparation in my museum
to show this.
The question now arises, what is to form the food of
this marine monster? The problem is difficult, because
not only must the animal feed, but he must actually lay
up fat; therefore his food must of necessity be abundant ;
but think what kind of food is likely to be abundant in
the frozen or freezing seas. We find, in fact, the largest
animal in creation preying, it may be almost said, on the
smallest animal in creation. The sea in these parts is
sometimes so filled with immense multitudes of small
animalcula dispersed through it, that they colour the
water of a greenish or brown hue. The principal food
of the Greenland whale consists of a small crustacean
not larger than the common house-fly, which lives on
these animalcula, and which is found in greatest abun-
dance when the temperature of the sea is from 34° to 35°.
The ordinary temperature of the sea amongst ice is 29°.
The colour of the water varies from dark brown to olive-
green and clear blue, the blue water being the coldest.
These little Crustacea are transparent, and the con-
tents of their stomachs can easily be seen to be dark
brown or green, as the case may be, giving the like colour
to the sea.
Captain Gray tells me that oil can be extracted by
properly treating this whale’s food. Is it not wonderful
that the oil should be as it were already in minute
é
eee ee
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 331
animated drops, so that the whale can easily assimilate
them, and fill up the cells of his skin with a vast quantity
of oil? a good whale of fifty-two feet being capable of
yielding, when boiled down, twenty tons of oil. We have
already seen how the whale is to catch these animated oil
globules which form its food. Teeth would not be of the
least use to him. The only thing to be of use would be a
sieve. Aristotle first remarked this fact. ‘ Mysticetus
etiam pilas in ore intus habet vice dentiwm swis setrs
similes ’—* The whale has hairs in his mouth instead of
teeth, like the hairs of a pig.’ On this Professor Owen
- remarks :—‘ To a, person looking into the mouth of a
stranded whale, the concavity of the palates would appear
to be beset with coarse hair. The species of Balenoptera
which frequents the Mediterranean might have afforded
to the father of natural history the subject of his philo-
sophical comparison.’
Captain Gray thus describes the movements of whales
when feeding :—‘ When the food is near the surface, they
usually choose a space between two pieces of ice, from
three to four hundred yards apart, which whalers term
their beat, and swim backwards and forwards until they
are satisfied, or the food is exhausted. They often go with
the point of their nose so near the surface that the water
can be seen running over it, just as it does over a stone in
a shallow stream; they turn round before coming to the
- surface to blow, and lie for a short time to swallow the
food before going away for another mouthful. They often
continue feeding in this way for hours, on and off, after-
wards disappearing under the nearest floe, sleeping pro-
bably under the ice, and coming out again when ready for
332 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
another meal. In no other way can their sudden reap-
pearance at the same place be accounted for.
‘Very often the food lies from ten to fifteen fathoms
below the surface of the water. In this case the whales’
movemeuts are quite different. After feeding, they come
to the surface to breathe and lie still for a minute. One
can easily see the effort they make when swallowing.
They then raise their heads partially out of the water, and
dive down again, throwing their tails up in the air every
time they disappear. Their course below the water can
often be traced from their eddy. This is caused by the
movement of the tail, which has the effect of smoothing
the water in circles immediately bebind them.
‘More whales have been caught when feeding in this
way than in any other; they lie longer on the surface, and
generally head the same way every time they appear. This
is very important to whale-fishers, because whales must be
approached tail-on to give any certainty of getting near
enough to have a chance of harpooning them, and the
harpooner has a better idea where to piace his boat to be
in readiness to pull on to them whenever they come to
the surface. —
‘Like all the other inhabitants of the sea, whales are
affected by the tides, being most numerous at the full »
and new moon, beginning to appear three days before, and
disappearing entirely three days after, the change. Often
this will go on for months with the utmost regularity,
unless some great change in the ice takes place, such as
the floes breaking up or the ice being driven off the
ground ; in either case they will at once disappear.
‘No doubt whales are seen and often taken at any time
te ae |) i ee ee UE Le
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 333
of the tides; but if a herd is hunted systematically, and
they are attached to a particular feeding bank, this is
their usual habit. This peculiarity in their habits cannot
be easily accounted for; their food is as abundant during
the neap as it is in the spring tides.’
I have some very fine specimens, showing the struc-
ture of the baleen, in my museum at South Kensington.
The longest slip of baleen is no less than 13 ft. 2 in. in
length and 9 in. in width. This must have been taken
from a magnificent animal. Two other very fine slips of
baleen measure respectively 9 ft. 3 in. by 8Lin. The mode
of the progressive growth of the baleen is a modification
of the design adopted in the tooth of the rabbit or the
tusk of the elephant. The baleen is wrongly called
whalebone. It certainly comes out of the whale, but
there is no bone whatever in its composition. It is com-
posed of hardened hair. The horn of the rhinoceros is
also composed of hairs matted, as it were, together into a
solid horn. The hairs of the baleen are united one to the
other by a kind of animal glue. By boiling and hammer-
| ing I find the baleen can be reduced to a state of hair.
The great anatomist and founder of the Royal College
of Surgeons was the first to describe the wonderful
mechanism of the growth of the baleen. I shall quote
the words of this great man :—‘ The plates of the baleen
are formed upon a vascular substance not immediately
adhering to the lower jaw-bone, but having a more dense
substance between, which is also vascular. This substance,
which may be called the nidus of the whalebone, sends
out thin, broad prongs answering to each plate, on which
the plate is formed, as the cock’s spur or the bull’s horn
354 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
on the bony core, or a tooth on its pulp, so that each plate
is necessarily hollow at its growing end, and the first part
of the growth taking place on tbe inside of the hollow,
&c.’? The whole passage is too long to quote, but the
process of growth may be thus illustrated: —Take an
envelope, gum it up, place it on one end, cut off the other
edge with scissors, gently squeeze it till it opens a little,
imagine the open part of the envelope to be filled with a soft
gluey material, and that this material gradually hardens
into baleen as it descends, till at last it is a solid plate
of baleen, 2.¢. the uncut edge of the envelope.
When at Peterhead I inspected Captain Gray’s store-
house of whalebone. The whalebone, as taken from the
whale, is piled up against the wall; it is then placed in a
large vat containing hot water, and the rough outside is
cleaned off by women. JI was much struck to find how
very soft and elastic whalebone is when wet. I expect
that when it is in the whale’s mouth it is very pliable,
and, in fact, little more than hardened gum. Rats are
very fond of whalebone. We pulled down the stacks of
whalebone, and Gray was much annoyed to find the rats
had gnawed at and spoiled some of the very best pieces.
Gray tells me that a whale’s age can be ascertained by the
growth on the bone each year being shown by a well-marked
succession of growth, somewhat like the rings in timber.
The eye of a living whale has a very comical look
about it; it has eyelids which open and shut. It is
placed very low down in the body (see illustration, p. 320).
Captain Gray has seen a whale come up from the bottom,
turn on his side, take a good look at the ship, and then go
downagain. He thinks the whales go under the ice to sleep.
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 335
The following are the dimensions of two of the whales
of the last voyage :—A bull whale forty-eight feet from nose
to tail; nose to the eye, seventeen feet; breadth across
the head, eight feet ten inches; gape, nine feet. Another
bull whale: total length, forty-seven feet ; head, seventeen
feet eight inches; body between the fins, eleven feet;
breadth of head, nine feet three inches.
At the Peterhead Museum there is a lovely specimen
of a foetal whale about thirty inches long; this little baby
whale is the prettiest thing I have seen for many a day.
From examining the specimens at Peterhead I think I
discovered an indentation on the nose that proved that
sucking whales have whiskers. In a porpoise just born
I discovered three hairs on one side of the snout and two
on the other. They were very slightly attached to the
skin, and of a pinkish colour. The whales suckle their
young with milk. Whale’s milk sounds very like pigeon’s
milk. I well recollect my father, the Dean, telling a story
of old Mr. Clift, of the College of Surgeons, going down to
dissect a whale somewhere at the mouth of the Thames,
and coming back with a quantity of whale’s milk, from which
he obtained cream, and subsequently butter. John Hunter
(my great ideal) never tasted whale’s milk, but he writes:
—‘ Whale’s milk is probably very rich, for in that caught
near Berkeley with its young, the milk, which was tasted
by Mr. Jenner and Mr. Ludlow, surgeon at Sodbury, was
rich, like a cow’s milk to which cream had been added.’
He then goes on to describe the milk-secreting glands,
‘situated on each side of the middle line of the abdomen
' at the lower part; they are flat bodies lying between the
external layer of fat and abdominal muscles. They are
336 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
there that they may not vary the external shape of the
animal, and the trunk is large and appears to act as a
reservoir for the milk.’
The young whales are said to suck for at least a year.
The mother is very affectionate to them. The yearling
whales are called ‘ shortheads,’ because the plates of
baleen are almost rudimental. JI imagine that as he is
sucking he does not require to feed on the ordinary food,
just in the same way as a sucking human baby has no
teeth, the baby teeth gradually appearing as the time
for its requiring solid food progresses. When two years
old, and weaned, young whales are naturally thin. They
are then called ‘stunts.’ A great many charity children
are stunts (who ever saw a fat charity child?). When
they have attained their full size they are called ‘ schull-
fish.’
The following extract regarding the size of the whales
is from Scoresby’s ‘ Voyage to Greenland,’ chap. vi., page
49 :—
‘ This whale, though a “ sucker,” was 19 feet in length,
and 14 feet 5 inches in circumference at the thickest part
of the body. The external skin on the body was an inch
and three-quarters thick, being about twice the thickness
of the same membranes in a full-grown animal. The
blubber was, on an average, five inches in thickness; the
largest of the whalebone measured only twelve inches,
about one-half of which was imbedded in the gums. The
external part of these fringes, not exceeding six inches in
length, did not seem sufficient to enable the little whale
yet to catch, by filtration out of the sea, the shrimps and
other insects on which the animal in a more advanced
. :
at aa ars
_ STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 337
stage is dependent for its nourishment. Maternal assist-
ance and protection appeared, therefore, to have been
essential for its support.
‘The muscles about the neck, appropriated to the
movements of the jaws, formed a bed, if extended, of
nearly five feet broad, and a foot thick. The central part
of the diaphragm was two inches in thickness. The two
principal arteries in the neck were so large as to admit a
man’s hand and arm. The general appearance of the
brain is not unlike that of other Mammalia; but its
smallness is remarkable. In this whale, of 11,200 pounds,
or seventy times the weight of a man, tbe brain was only
three pounds twelve ounces. Large as the whale is in
bulk, the throat is but narrow. In this animal the
diameter of the cesophagus, when fully distended, was
scarcely 24 inches, with difficulty admitting my hand.
The foregoing measurements and weight all refer to a
sucking whale that at the time of capture was under
maternal protection.’ |
In the Peterhead Museum there are some very inter-
esting specimens of harpoons. There we see a harpoon
taken from the back of a whale by the ship ‘ Active,’
June 30,.1863, supposed to have been in the whale’s back
thirty-three years; and a harpoon with line attached,
taken out of the back of a whale by the crew of the
steamship ‘ Eclipse,’ July 1872 ; this harpoon had been in
this whale since 1870.
I have received (among several valuable specimens
from the Arctic Seas) some very fine ‘ whale-lice.’ The
Latin name of these curious parasites is Cyamus ceti, or
Pow de la baleine of the French. When turned out
Z
338 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
of the spirits of wine they dry up immediately, and show
that they are of a horny substance: they are horrid-
looking wretches, buff coloured. The largest is three-
quarters of an inch long, and about the same in width.
There are three legs on each side, and two legs which pro-
ject from behind, like steering-oars. All these legs are
armed with a claw. The two hind legs have the longest
and strongest grappling-hooks. On placing a big claw
under the microscope, I find it is crooked, at about the
angle ofa fish-hook half unbent. The lower third of the claw
is transparent, and has a point sharper than the sharpest
sewing-needle ever turned out at Redditch. So sharp are
these needle-pointed claws that I find if I apply the dead
whale-louse to my cheek, the sharp claws take a firm hold
on to the flesh. Even picked up they will stick firmly to
the fingers. Each beast has two very minute black
eyes, like specks, and the back appears armour-plated, not
unlike the back of an armadillo. There are three females
among the lot. They carry their eggs, the size of a large
egg of an ant, in a sac under the posterior third of the
body. Why do all these parasites breed so fast? These
specimens were taken from a fair-sized whale ; the place
where they were found was behind the pectoral fins, just
where they join the body. It frequently happens that the
lice congregate in patches as big as a plate all over the
whale’s body, eating great holes into the skin of the unfor-
tunate beast. The whale seems to suffer much from the
persecution of these terrible sharp-clawed parasites, for he
is often seen to jump clean out of the water, as though
attempting to get rid of them. No jumping out of the
water would unseat these sure-seated jockeys, for they
STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 339
must be cut out of the skin with a knife before a man can
get them off. It is stated (but not by Captain Gray) that
the whale-lice are occasionally seen in such numbers
upon the whales that the individuals so infested are recog-
nised at a considerable distance by the peculiar colour im-
parted to them by the mass of parasites.
It is very difficult to form a theory as to what may be
the use of these parasites to the whale. There may possibly
be a reason, but I doubt whether the wretches can afford
much domestic pleasure and comfort to the persecutee.
It may be possible that it is nature’s ordained means for
keeping the species in check, and not allowing the whales
to increase too rapidly in the seas which they inhabit. I
will illustrate my meaning thus :—
In the vast forests of Africa live elephants. Now, these
animals are so large and strong that there is nothing bigger
than they to beat them. From the elephant we go down-
wards in the scale of creation, and we will stop at the
point of flies. All along this great series we find one kind
of animal preying upon another, in obedience to the law,
‘Eat and be eaten.’ The reader will ask, what is to kill
and eat the elephant? My answer is, the flies, of course ;
and I believe it is a positive fact that a great many ele-
phants are killed by flies. These gigantic animals get
wounded. In the hot climates where they live the wounds
immediately attract swarms of flies; these flies lay their
egos, and when the young are hatched out they eat great
holes into the elephant’s body. Pain, irritation, and fever
are caused by the attacks of these flies, and I am informed
that it not unfrequently happens that elephants are found
dead, the cause of death being fly-blows. It may be pos-
Z2
340 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES.
sible, therefore, that these whale-lice, minute as they are
in comparison to the gigantic size of the whale on which
they live, may sometimes cause the death of the whale.
The death of the whale would be a great boon to the
sharks, sea-birds, shrimps, and other sea creatures, to
which his flesh is as a Greenwich dinner to hungry Lon-
doners ; but yet these comparatively small beasts are not
of themselves sufficiently powerful to kill a whale.
A man may fight single-handed a lion, an elephant, or
other wild beast, and will probably be victorious ; but
place this same victorious man in a bed previously occupied
by a colony of fleas or Norfolk Howards, and he would soon
run, despite a well-stocked armament of rifles, shot-guns,
and other sporting paraphernalia. The same inability in
man to fight numbers of minute things has often been
proved by salmon-anglers, who have been forced to retreat
from the river-bank by clouds of mosquitoes, when they
did not care a bit for half a dozen water-bailiffs, even
though armed with the new clauses of the Salmon Bill of
1873.
It may be possible that these whale-lice, insignificant
and unimportant as individuals, may by numbers and con-
stant irritation kill a whale fifty-seven feet long and
_ weighing over a hundred tons, this being about the largest
right whale Captain Gray has ever killed.
Whales are also subject to another kind of parasite ; it
is a barnacle which buries itself deep in the skin of the
heap. It is called Coronula balenearis, or the ¢ whale’s —
barnacle.’ A specimen sent me from Golspie was figured
and described in Land and Water, May 19, 1866. The
specimen itself is in my museum. |
i,
*
Maa. Ae re eS ee
341
THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER
AQUARIUM.
Ir will be well recollected that a whale was on view in
the Westminster Aquarium in October 1877. This whale
did not survive very long. Farini, then the manager,
with great pluck said to his agent, Mr. Zach Coop, ‘ Zach,
he is dead. Go and fetch me another whale; be off
directly.’ So off goes Mr. Zach up to Lerwick, Shetland,
to see whether, by the assistance of the Lerwick fisher-
men, he could not fill up the vacancy in the whale tank in
the Westminster Aquarium. Mr. Coop was, however, a
little too late in the season for the Lerwick whales, so he
returned whaleless. So said Farini, ‘ Well, if you cannot
catch a whale this side of the Atlantic, we must go to the
other side for him.’ The telegraph was set to work, and a
whale-trap was prepared in St. Paul’s Bay, which is
situated in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, to the westward of
Newfoundland. In the spring of the year the whales
come into the estuary of the St. Lawrence River, probably
in search of food. So it came to pass that directly the
school of whales in the year 1878 entered the river St.
Lawrence, they swam straight into the most ingenious
trap awaiting them, and were caught, or rather made to
strand themselves.
>
342 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM.
A whale ashore is as helpless a thing as a ship ashore.
There he must stay, floundering on the sand, rock, or mud,
till either the water comes to his assistance, or else he is
picked up by the hands of man. Previously to the whales
coming to St. Paul’s Bay their travelling carriages were
prepared to bring them to London. These consisted of
immense boxes or packing-cases, the lids being formed of
loose canvas. Zach Coop managed to pack four of these
gentlemen—one for Westminster, one for Manchester, and
one for Blackpool. The other, the fourth, probably dis-
gusted at the whole proceeding, maliciously departed this
life in the middle of the Atlantic.
The authorities of the Westminster Aquarium tele-
graphed me that the whale would probably arrive about
six o'clock. I had not long to wait when a cab drove up,
out of which jumped Farini, looking very pale and travel-
worn. In the transport of the whales from Liverpool
various misadventures and difficulties, requiring great
management, had taken place. But, however, all’s well
that ends well, and the first words that Farini said to me
were, ‘ He is all right.’ Having gone through many such
expeditions in carrying water beasts long distances, I fully
sympathised with Farini’s joyous exclamation.
The box was brought tothe Aquarium in a van. They
slid it out of the van gently on to the shoulders of a small
army of men. After a considerable amount of shuffling
of feet, and orders promptly obeyed, the whale’s box was
placed upon trestles alongside of his future home, the
covering of the canvas was taken off, and I had the first
look at him. He was lying on his stomach in the box,
and was securely packed round with seaweed so that he
i)
. *
THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 343
could not flop about. I could not see his face, only his
blow-hole, which I was delighted to find was acting
smoothly and well. The general appearance made one
query whether he was alive or dead, but the action of the
blow-hole on the top of the head gave one an idea that
the creature was a gigantic white human baby with black
lips snoring in its sleep.
The whale is said to weigh about a ton and a half.
We did not attempt to lift him out of the box, but simply
ordered the carpenters to knock away the boards from one
side of it, and to clear away the seaweed as much as pos-
sible. This done, all hands were piped to tilt the box
—‘ One, two, three,’ and the whale gradually turned over
on his side like a man in a restless sleep. Another inch
more up, and Mr. Whale rolled off into the water with a
terrific splash and bang, sending the spray flying all over
the place.
At first he sank right to the bottom, and remained
there some little time. We watched him with great
anxiety. So numerous had been his adventures for the
last five weeks, that no doubt he did not quite know
where he was, whether back home in the Gulf of St.
Lawrence, or still in his box. Nor had he probably quite
made up his mind whether he ought to adapt his blow-
hole to breathing air pure and simple, or whether he
would have to take the usual precautions to prevent the
air getting down into his nose when in the water.
After a while the whale began to realise his position ;
he gently got up steam with his tail, and gradually
ascended to the surface. Arrived there he gave us a
specimen of his first blow, which sounded not unlike the
344 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM.
splutter made by a man when he first reaches the air
after a dive. Then he went down again, being probably —
somewhat nervous at the assembled company. Finding
that he was not molested or bothered by anything, he
then began to enjoy himself in his bath, and mightily
pleased he seemed to be with the lavations of cold water
once more.
I was sorry to see that during his five weeks’ journey
his cuticle, or scarf-skin, had got loose and was peeling
off; but asa set-off to this, he had no cold in his head..
When the last whale arrived he certainly had threatening
inflammation of the lungs. This present fellow had no
symptoms whatever of this.
I picked out of the box a bit of the whale’s cuticle;
it is very thin, and about the consistency and feel of oiled ~
silk or gutta-percha sheeting. On one side it is very
smooth, and looks as though it had been highly polished
with furniture polish; it is very transparent, and exhibits
numerous specks, reminding us of the appearance of the
insertion of the hairs—always in threes—into a pigskin
saddle. JI was pleased to see that the bath seemed to
refresh the whale very much, and to relieve him of much |
of the skin hanging loose about him. To my mind, the
fear was that fungus might grow upon him.
After the whale had been in the bath about an
hour I again examined him. By this time the beast
seemed to have made himself quite at home. He did
not seem the least frightened, but was gently swimming
up and down the tank. It was a curious thing that
not once did he go near the sides of the tank. He
kept in the middle, swimming backwards and forwards
THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 345
within a given distance. He went to the ends of his beat,
turned round, and came back again, sometimes swimming
in an oval. When he came to the end of his beat he
went ‘threes about.’ In performing this movement, he
turned his side up to the top of the water, so that one
could see his funny little bead-like black eye. That
whales do this when they look to the top of the water—
the natural position of the eyes enabling them to see
only sideways—is a fact, as I know from Captain David
Gray, for he has seen more than once a whale come up
from deep water, and inspect the ship, swimming round
and round it, just as did the Westminster whale. When
the whale had been in his whalery about three hours,
he had quite recovered himself both in mind and body.
He was swimming very leisurely, very easily, and very
gracefully, and blowing about three times in two minutes ;
his blow-hole is situated a comparatively long distance
from the point of his nose. The first thing to be ob-
served was the point of his nose; instantly followed the
blow-hole, and you could hear the sharp quick puff, which
can be imitated by saying the word ‘puff’ with open
lips. Then came his arched back, which appeared
for a moment on the surface of the water like a crescent.
Many of our friends have doubtless seen porpoises rolling
at sea, and what a curious appearance their black backs
have in the distance.
Upon the swelling waves the dolphins show
Their bending backs, then, swiftly darting, go,
And in a thousand wreaths their bodies throw.
I was at once reminded of pictures on old china, &e.,
346 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM.
of Arion, who made his escape by mounting a dolphin and
riding him across the ocean, a fact thus chronicled by
Ovid :—
But past belief, a dolphin’s archéd back,
Preserved Arion from his destined wreck ;
Secure he sits, and with harmonious strains
Requites the bearer for his friendly pains.
How Arion managed to stick on the slippery back of a
dolphin, a considerable ‘buck jumper,’ I know not, but
poets and painters are very wonderful fellows, and can
make impossibilities look like possibilities.
The arrival of this whale was important in two senses.
Firstly, as a sight pure and simple, to the younger minds
certainly educational. I observed two little children gazing
most attentively at the whale, and that a new idea was at
that moment being photographed on their infant minds I
have no doubt. Secondly, the whale may enable natu-
ralists to discover many points in the history of Cetacea
hitherto unexplained, to wit, the action of the blow-hole.
The problem solved by this wonderful piece of mechanism
is very marvellous.
The first unaided idea, of course, is that an animal
destined to live in water must be a fish, and, of course,
breathe by gills. I once terribly offended an old salt by
telling him a whale was not a fish. ‘Hang it, man!’
he said, ‘I’ve been at sea man and boy for forty years,
and now you tell me a whale is not a fish!’ A whale,
however, is pure mammalian like ourselves. The young
are born alive and suck milk; their blood is warm; they
have a four-cavitied heart ; their bones, muscles, and ner-
vous system resemble in structure those of other Mam-
malia.
ae
LHE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 347
But the orders are that these great Mammalia are to
live all their lives in the waters without ever coming out.
Other creatures, notably the hippopotamus, the walrus,
and seals, come out of the water when they choose, but
get their food in the water ; how then is the breathing of
these animals to be managed? In the seal we find self-
acting valves that close the apertures in the nostrils as
tight as a cork in a wine-bottle when the creature de-
scends beneath the waves.
In the whale we find altogether a different kind of
self-acting breathing-valve. The windpipe does not com-
municate with the mouth; a hole is, as it were, bored
right through the back of the head. Engineers would
do well to copy the action of the valve of the whale’s
blow-hole; a more perfect piece of structure it is impos-
sible to imagine. Day and night, asleep or awake, the
whale works his breathing apparatus in such a manner
that not a drop of water ever gets down into the lungs.
Again, the whale must of necessity stay a much longer
period of time under water than seals; this alone might
possibly drown him, inasmuch as the lungs cannot have
access to fresh air. We find that this difficulty has
been anticipated and obviated by a peculiar reservoir in
the venous system, which reservoir is situated at the back
of the lungs.
The white whale is the Beluga delphinapterus. His
home is in the Arctic seas, especially the great bays and
straits which so properly record the names of Davis and
Hudson, and which may be generally said to separate
Greenland (lat. 60°to 80°N.) from the north-east coast
of British North America. What they do or whither they
i
NN a ee ey ee
348 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM.
go all the winter, no human being knows. Their structure is
such that their fat, which surrounds their body like a great-
coat, preserves them during the awful cold they have to
bear. In habits these animals are gentle, and not fierce
like the great cachalot. They are fond of company, and go
in herds. Jam informed that they will seek rather than
avoid the company of man, and that when a vessel is in
sight they will come and play round the bows as a sort of
welcome to their kingdom in the vast deep. It is also
stated that Mr. Beluga forms a sort of advanced guard of
the valuable whalebone whale; and when the beluga is
seen, harpooners begin to look up their whale lances.
Like the right or whalebone whale, the attachment of the
mother to its calf is very great. The calf, when first
born, is said to be of a dazzling whiteness; as it gets
bigger it becomes milk-white. Beluga’s food is cod, flat-
fish, such as plaice, flounders, &c., and possibly salmon.
At the Aquarium he was fed with eels. One of these eels
managed to creep inside a fold of the whale’s skin, and
seemed inclined to eat\the whale instead of the whale
eating him: the whale had to be caught with a great
sheet of canvas, and taken out of the water before this
eel could be removed. Tench were also tried, as the eels
seemed a little too active for Beluga, and tench are slug-
-gish. It was curious to remark how the eels seemed to
know he was their enemy, for they kept up in a corner
quite clear of his track. Roach also were placed in his
tank; it. was very remarkable to see how the roach
seemed likewise to know that the whale was their enemy.
As he came near them the shoals broke up immediately,
and dispersed right and left as quickly as they could.
THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 349
Beluga’s mouth was not very wide; he had nine or ten
small teeth in it. His pectoral fins were oval, broad,
and thick, and he generally used them for balancing
purposes. Every now and then he took a stroke with
them to assist his forward movement.
Those who wish for a nearer view of the beluga cron
examine the cast which I took of him now in my museum,
which contains a very fair collection of casts of the whale
kind. Casting is the only possible way of preserving the
exact outline of whales. The plaster takes accurately the
impression of every fold in the skin, and the exact
dimensions of the tail, mouth, eyes, lips, &e. No stuffing
skeletons or drawings will do this. The drawback to
casting is that a is very expensive and exceedingly
laborious. |
350
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE AROTIC NARWHAL.
WHEN at Peterhead, during the herring inquiry, I observed
on board the whaler ‘ Eclipse,’! a very fine specimen of
the narwhal’s skull, with the horn still resting in it.
This specimen Captain Gray most kindly gave me for
my fish museum, South Kensington. The total length
of this horn projecting from the skull was 4 ft. 1 in.
and the portion of the horn inside the skull 10 inches;
the weight of the horn ten and a half pounds. The
beauty of this specimen is that it is quite in the rough.
One-half of it presents a dark reddish appearance, as if it
had been touched over with paint. Captain Gray tells me
this is a natural colour, and is frequently seen in narwhal
horn. The twist of the horn goes from right to left. The
horn grows from the left side of the skull. It seldom if
ever grows from the right side of the skull, never from
the centre. Occasionally narwhals’ skulls are found with
two horns ; in this case the right horn is always very small.
Captain Gray has been kind enough to send me the fol-
lowing interesting account of the narwhals that have come
under his notice. It will be seen from this what huge
creatures these narwhals really are :—
1 J have given a full description of the ‘ Eclipse’ in my Log: book of
a Fisherman and Zoologist, p. 295,
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL. 351
‘T herewith send you all the measurements of narwhals
that I have recorded.
Piciaaiemaie; lenoth, 12 ft. 6 in; girth, 7 ft..6 in.;
horn, 3 ft. 10 in. long, very rare in the female.
‘2nd. Male; length, 13 ft; girth, 8 ft.; horn, 6 ft.
4, in. »
‘3rd. Male; length, 14 ft. 3 in.; girth, 8 ft. 4 in.;
horn, 6 ft. 43 in.
‘4th. Male; length, 14.ft. 4 in.; girth, 9 ft. 1 in.; had
a broken horn, which I sent you lately.
fora Male; length, 15.ft. 1 in. ;, girth, 9 ft. 5 in. ;
horn, 7 ft. 6 in.
‘6th. Male ; length, 15 ft. 4 in.; girth, 10 ft.; horn,
7 ft. 8 in. You have this horn in your museum. :
‘The narwhal whose head and horn I gave you lately,
was caught in latitude 78° 45’ N.; longitude 0° 30’ W.
I do not know what might have been the length of the
longest horn I have seen, but I have measured one
8 ft. 4 in., and I do not think they often exceed that
length.
‘JT am not sure what use the narwhal has for its horn.
It is only the males who usually have them. We see
them often striking them against each other, and they are
nearly always broken at the point.
‘The narwhal is a very peaceful creature; they are like
their big brothers the whales. The male and female go
in different herds. They are very subject to colds, if
one may judge from the hoarse way some of them blow;
you would fancy sometimes you had got amongst a herd
of cattle. I examine the stomach of every narwhal taken,
and find that their staple food in Greenland is cuttlefish.
/
~ *
*. %
352 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL.
The inner skin of the narwhal is used for making shoe-
leather. |
‘Narwhals are only taken by whale-fishers as a pastime.
I have heard of vessels in Davis Straits taking’ 100 of
them. I do not know any particular use for narwhal
horns. ‘There was a great demand for them some years —
since. Their value at that time was from 20s. to 30s. per
pound. It was said they were sent to Japan to ornament —
religious houses or churches, but I do not know the truth
of this.’
Captain Gray is quite right about the use of narwhal
horns in Japanese temples. A friend of mine sent two
hundred pounds’ worth of narwhal horns to the Chinese
and Japanese markets, but unfortunately the ship was
taken by pirates. The Chinese Ambassador not long ago
examined at my house the. specimen Captain Gray gave
me, and was so much struck with its appearance that I do
not think it possible he could have seen a narwhal horn
before. He was most anxious to get a specimen to take
back with him to China. I fancy that the narwhal horns
are used in some form of worship in the Buddhist temples
in China.
As regards the question of the female narwhal carrying
a horn, Captain Gray captured in June 1872, as above
mentioned, a female narwhal carrying a horn 3 ft. 10 in.
in length. The only other instance I have met with
of a female narwhal having a horn is mentioned by
Scoresby. In the account of his voyage to Greenland in
1822, he says :—‘ Besides the whale now captured we killed
during our stay near the same place two female narwhals,
one of which, a case most extraordinary if not unpre-
~ ¥
a oa!
= }
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL. 353
cedented in this sex, had an externalhorn. This horn was
A ft. 3 in. in length, of which 12 inches were embedded in
the skull. It had also a milk tusk, as is common in
others of the sex, 9 inches long, of a conical form, and
obliquely truncated at the thicker end, without the knot
found in many of the milk tusks. The horn, asin the male,
was on the left side of the head. The length of the animal
was 13 ft. 6 in. It was beautifully variegated with bluish
black or grey spots. It differed in no respect from other
females of the same age excepting with regard to the horn.’
The ivory of the weapon is valuable; it is more com-
pact, harder, and more susceptible of a good polish than
that of the elephant’s tusk. There is shown to visitors at
the Versailles Library a walking-stick formed of a nar-
whal’s tusk, ornamented with mother-of-pearl. The throne
of the Kings of Denmark once—and perhaps still—to be
seen in the Castle of Rosenberg, is of the same material.
Some years ago there was a remarkable collection of
narwhal tusks on sale at Mr. Wareham’s, Castle Street,
Leicester Square. There were upwards of forty of these
tusks, varying in length from 2 ft. 6 in. to 9 feet. I
do not recollect ever having seen so many or such fine
tusks in one series.
When Captain Gray returned from his whaling voyage
in 1879, he gave me the following most interesting account
of a fight between a narwhal and a walrus :—
Extract from the Log of the SS. ‘ Eclipse, July 6, 1879.
‘Running north through floes and loose ice this forenoon
I noticed some distance ahead what I at first took to be
the stock of a hand harpoon, standing out of very greasy
water, and a number of birds sitting round it. This I at
AA
854 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL.
first thought might be a dead whale, just rising to the
surface, but I soon saw that it was a narwhal horn. As
we came nearer I observed something brown-looking, and
was puzzled for some time before I made this out to be a
walrus, evidently holding the narwhal.
‘As soon as we were near enough, I sent two boats
away with orders to strike a hand harpoon into the nar-
whal, and fire a gun harpoon into the walrus, both of which
they did. The first harpooner struck the narwhal close
past the walrus’s nose, whereupon he looked very savage,
and let go his hold of the narwhal, which immediately
began to sink. The walrus being unwilling to part with
his prey upon such easy terms, dived underneath the nar-
whal and raised him to the surface, again renewing his
hold with his teeth, and clasping him round the body with
his flippers.
‘The second boat now came up, and the harpooner fired
his gun harpoon through the walrus’s neck. He then let go
his hold of the narwhal, and dragged the boat a consider-
able distance to windward, when a rifle bullet in the back
of the head finished him.
‘On examination, after getting them on board, we
found the narwhal disembowelled, and a oreat part of the
belly eaten away or torn into shreds by the walrus, who
had been very particular as to the parts he ate, and had
been taking plenty of time to feed. He had eaten the
blubber as clean off the skin as if it had been flinched’
with a knife. The narwhal was quite fresh, and newly
killed, and in the death-struggle had been all scored with
the walrus’s tusks from nose to tail in every direction,
although the inner skin was not cut.
_——
NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL, 355
©The walrus was in prime condition. The blubber upon
him was three inches thick; his stomach was quite full of
pieces of sealskin and the part of the narwhal which he
had eaten. He had, at a moderate estimate, one hundred
and fifty gallons of oil and blubber in his stomach.
‘The length of the narwhal was fourteen feet, exclusive
of horn, by nine feet in circumference. The length of
horn was five feet.
‘The walrus measured eleven feet long, and nine feet
ten inches in circumference.
‘The question is, How did the walrus manage to hold
a powerful animal like the narwhal ? certainly more in
his element than the walrus, and who can spin out a hun-
dred fathoms of whale line very smartly, even with a
big gun harpoon through and through him.
‘The only way I can think of is that he had found the
narwhal asleep, gone underneath him, dug his tusks into
his belly, and clasped him round the body with his
flippers, in which position we found them, with this
difference, that the walrus was uppermost.
‘This is only the third walrus I have seen off on the
deep-water whaling banks during the last fourteen years.
Their natural home being near the land, where their
ordinary food is, all kinds of shellfish, I could never before
understand how they got their living so far from the
shore, not knowing that they would eat seals and nar-
whals, or that they could catch them.
‘T expect that those we see out in deep water are
like rogue elephants driven out of the herd, or like the
man-eating tigers we hear of in India.’
AA2Z
356
UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR, AT THE
SOUTHPORT AQUARIUM.
I was much pleased to be able to pay a short visit to the
Southport Aquarium on my way home from the north in
November 1876. The most remarkable novelty was a
splendid alligator about eight feet long. He had a nice
spacious glass cage all to himself, the two ends of the cage
containing gravel stones, and in the centre was a pond in
which he could bathe when so inclined. When first
bought, Mr. Alligator was in a very seedy condition
indeed, terribly thin and wan-looking—in fact, half
starved. His skin was all in cracks, and his coat of mail
had to be oiled every morning by means of a flannel on
the end of a stick. This acted like a Turkish bath to our
friend, and did his constitution good. For many days,
even weeks, he sulkily refused to eat, and lay quiet and
still like a stuffed thing. At last he took—all of a gulp—
alive pigeon, and ever afterwards he fed well. \ The secret
of getting him to eat was temperature—temperature the
old story, the key to so many fishery problems, whether of
salmon, oysters, or alligators. Hot-water pipes were in-
troduced under the floor of his den, and Mr. Alligator,
feeling the agreeable heat to his gouty toes and elegant
figure, fancied, I suppose, he was back again in the tropics,
UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR. 357
so he woke up and began to eat; and what more tasteful
beginning could there be than a nice live pigeon with
feather sauce? This ogre now feeds capitally on pigeons ;
in fact, he is getting expensive to keep; he will eat beef,
fish, and almost anything. They don’t stand live pigeon
dinners every day.
Anxious to show me his pet feeding, the curator offered
to give the alligator more supper ; he had already devoured
his proper supper. The curator got on to the top of
the cage and touched him gently with an iron rod. I was
surprised to see the activity of the rascal; he opened his
eyes with a jerk, up went his head like a run-away hansom
cab horse, he gave an indignant whisk with his tail like a
lady picking up her skirts when a clumsy fellow puts his
foot on the pet lace, and, to my surprise, began to puff
himself up. Gradually he became larger, larger, and
larger, like the blowing up of a football; his armour
glittered, and the bony studs stood well out from the soft
intermediate skin. I confess, when at his full I longed to
run a pin into him to save his life, as I saw he had a
chance of meeting with the same fate as the foolish frog
in Atsop’s Fables, who vainly puffed himself up trying to
become as big as the ox, with whom he was having an
argument. Just, however, as he came to the bursting
point, Alligatorus Rex alligatorum suddenly relaxed him-
self, and his steam escaped, I suppose, through his larynx
and nose. Anyhow, he began a most sonorous hiss.
‘ H-i-s-s, h-i-s-s;’ I can hear it now—just the noise a
dragon ought to make. It was like no hiss I ever heard
before, much deeper and louder sounding than any snake.
As he continued his hissing he became thinner and
358 UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR,
thinner, till he looked quite the skeleton of his former i
pretty self. Then he began to blow himself up again, for
(I could see it) the iron rod was getting up the monkey
of Mr. Alligator.
A chicken’s head and neck were then suddenly thrown
into the bath; in an instant Leviathan forgot his rage.
(Mem.: when a homo bipes implumes, one of our own
noble species, loses his temper, give him a dinner, and he |
will be all right, showing once again that ‘the nearest
way to the heart is down the mouth.’) However, hearing
the chicken’s head fall splash into the water, the alligator
—he should be called Uncle Tom—was after it in an
instant, and seized it just as a dog catches up a running
rat in his mouth. He first of all bit it spitefully as
though to kill it, if it happened to be a live thing; and
then—one, two, three, and away—chump; back went his
head, down his throat went the chicken’s head in a
moment. Reader, hold your nose and swallow a pill
before the looking-glass, and you will understand how
Uncle Tom swallowed the chicken’s head. His blackship
then gave a gulp, and, like the ‘Oh the poor workhouse
boy’ in the song, asked for more. Three chickens’ heads
and a bit of beef, extra rations, did Uncle Tom get that
evening, and all on myaccount. Supper over, he crawled
on to his warm bed of shingle, and as the door over his
head closed, he lazily shut his eyes, as much as to say,
‘Thank ye, my boy, you may come as often as -you like.
Now don’t bother me, I’m going to sleep; good night, my
hearties.’ ‘ Here, hie! please give me a nice live pike for
my breakfast to-morrow morning. I like pike; I shall
dream of pike, for I like (just as you like) a bit of sport as
Fie hn he
AT THE SOUTHPORT AQUARIUM. 359
well as a bit of grub, and if I can combine the two, why,
so much the better.
Really, ‘ Uncle Tom’ is a grand beast ; he is growing
so fast that he is to have a new drawing-room and dining-
room, and then he will have space to swish his tail; he
has not much room for his tail just now. I wonder how
it is that in the ‘ struggle for existence’ his tail has not
begun to curl; may be his descendants in one hundred
thousand years will have their tails curled up like a pug-
dog’s. By the way, why do some pigs wear straight tails,
some curly tails? There’s a problem for you.
Besides big Uncle Tom, there are a number of smaller
alligators. Close to the end of the Uncle’s cage is a
charming family of baby alligators, from ten inches to
one foot long. These little boys and girls have a nice
hot nursery, heated from underneath, and a flannel
blanket over their dear little heads. They are as active
as blackbeetles, and when their counterpane is taken off,
scuttle away in all directions. If I reckoned right, there
were twenty or thirty of these little fellows. Several of
the ladies in Southport have purchased pets from among
them, and it may be that no Southport lady will consider
her establishment perfect without a baby alligator to bask
on the hearth-rug, and go out for a walk on the promenade
with her. When the pet defuncts, he can be stuffed,
gilt, and put in the hat for an ornament, don’t you know ?
However, those inthe Aquarium are growing fast; they |
gorge like charity children at a ‘tea and bun’ festival.
The keeper cuts up fish into small bits, and throws
them into the cage ; they scramble for them famously, and
apparently love each other in that disinterested, charitable,
UGE UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR.
and unselfish manner which may be seen by a careful
observer who throws down handfuls of coppers among the
London gamins and street Arabs in the crowd when wait-
ing for the Lord Mayor to pass through Fleet Street on
‘ All Sprats’ Day, November 9. |
But there are yet more of Uncle Tom’s relations at
Southport. A huge box, looking like a gigantic coal-
scuttle, stands near the boilers in the engine-room. Open .-
sesame! and lo and behold a nest of young alligators
of all sizes and shapes, like the ladies’ bonnets and hats in
a Regent Street shop! The curator dives his hand in
and picks them out one by one, holding them aloft like an
old fishwife in the Edinburgh market selling Scotch
haddies. The lot are not yet presentable. They have
not yet received the certificates of the School Board, and
their tempers and appetites are not sufficiently mollified by
the furnace fire to go into the glass apartments which are
getting ready for them, so they remain at their ease, toast
themselves before the engine-room fire, while the engine-
driver consoles their minds by whistling to them ‘ Tommy,
make room for your uncle,’ and feeds them with bread and
cheese, which they will not eat.
361
THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY,
IN all ages and in all times there has been a natural desire
among the human race to perpetuate the memory of them-
selves, their ancestors, and of illustrious persons, both men
and women. The modes adopted of preserving the memory
of deceased people have been, first, by preserving the actual
bodies ; second, by making likenesses of these bodies; or
third, by erecting monuments with the name engraved
upon them. In the earliest ages of mankind the ancient
Egyptians, who had attained toa high state of civilisation,
attempted to preserve the remains of their friends by means
of embalming.
My dear old friend Herodotus, born B.c. 484, who,
some two thousand three hundred years ago, note-book in
hand, ‘inspected’ the manners and customs of the
Egyptians, obtained from the priests—I wonder how he
got the information ?—a detailed account of how to make
mummies. This is the sum and substance of Herodotus’s
official report. Mummy-making was probably a profession,
and these mummy-makers charged pretty high for their
labours. To make a person into a first-class mummy cost
a talent of silver (about equal to 225/. of English money),
the second cost twenty mine (or 75/.), the third a much
smaller sum. The Egyptian mummy-makers knew quite
362 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
well that the dry climate of Egypt would greatly assist in
the preservation of their work. Those of my readers who
wish to see a first-class mummy should examine, in the
Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, the re-
mains of the priest of the god Ammon. The name of this
dignitary of the Egyptian Church was Horsiensi of Thebes.
He was the son of Naspihiniegori, another priest, and he
held the office of thurifer, or incense-bearer—there was no
Lord Penzance in those days. Now the Rev. Horsiensi has
in his mummy state attained a good old age. Thebes, also
called Hecatompylos, on account of its hundred gates, was
in its splendour 1600—800 B.c., so that the mummied
priest we can go and see any day is about three thousand
years old.
The first form of monument was simplicity itself—it
consisted simply of throwing a stone or earth upon the
deceased person. We find this idea conveyed to us very
neatly by Horace (Ode 28) in the request made by the
deceased sailor, Archytas, to throw an earthen veil over his
shipwrecked body :— |
At tu, nauta, vagee ne parce malignus arenz
Ossibus et capiti inhumato
Particulam dare. .....
Quamquam festinas (non est mora longa) licebit
Injecto ter pulvere curras,
Nor thou, my friend, refuse with impious hand
A little portion of this wandering sand
To these my poor remains. _
Whate’er thy haste, oh! let my prayer prevail,
Thrice throw the sand, then hoist the flying sail.
The urgent request of poor Archytas was probably due
THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 363
to the idea which prevailed among the good people of
those days, that an unburied person wandered about after
death one hundred years. Here is the evidence of the belief.
Virgil writes (Aneid) :—
Heec omnis, quam cernis, inops inhumataque turba est ;
Portitor ille Charon ; hi quos vehit unda sepulti
Nee ripas datur horrendas et rauca fluenta,
Transportare prius, quam sedibus ossa quierunt,
Centum errant annos, volitantque hee littora circum.
‘All that crowd which you see consists of unburied
persons. The ferryman is Charon; these whom the stream
carries are interred, for it is not permitted to transport
them over the horrid banks and hoarse resounding waves
before their bones are lodged in urns. They wander a
hundred years, and flutter about these shores.’
The loose stones thrown on a body out of respect were
probably after a while replaced by one stone. The body
was buried, and the stone placed above the body as a
memorial of its resting-place. The best example of this,
to my idea, is conveyed by the Pyramids of Egypt, which
are sepulchral monuments to the memory of kings. When
the Radcliffe Library was first built at Oxford, it was spite-
fully remarked that this learned physician simply wished
to erect a huge monument to himself.
The modern form of monument isa stone placed either
over the grave, or else in some place where the deceased
was personally known. Such a monument may be said to
represent the separate stones thrown on Archytas, con-
solidated into one block, with the name subsequently in-
scribed thereon.
Another kind of monument is the actual representation
364 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
of the person when alive. The figure was represented
either as a whole figure such as a life-sized statue, or as a
bust ; and the figure or bust we find either erected in public
places, such as the Duke of Wellington at Hyde Park
Corner, Lord Nelson at Charing Cross, Jenner at Kensing-
ton Gardens; or placed in a consecrated edifice. Hence
probably the origin of conserving these memorials of the
illustrious departed at Westminster Abbey, that tomb of
kings; or, as the eloquent Dean Stanley so aptly called it,
the ‘home of the people of England, and the most vene-
rated fabric of the English Church.’
These monuments are made sometimes of stone,
generally of the most imperishable stone, viz. marble.
They are also sometimes made of metal, highly gilt and
ornamented ; seldom of wood. ‘There is, however, another
kind of material which claims favour to be utilised for
monumental purposes; that material is wax. Wax in
itself is about as imperishable a substance as can be found
among animal or vegetable substances ; butit has the dis-
advantage of being easily melted, and very friable, hence
it has not been used very much for monuments. Wax
was sometimes used in embalming, and it was a capital
material for making the wrinkles in the bandages of mum-
mies air-tight ; even in the present day a form of wax is
used for the tops of pickle-bottles. The body of King
Agesilaus was enveloped in wax, and conveyed to Lace-
demon. The Persians also used it for sepulchral purposes—
Perse jam cera circumlitos condiunt ut quam maxime
permaneant diuterna corpora. In the days of our an-
cestors, it appears that wax was put on its trial for
monumental purposes, and I propose in this article to
THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 365
make some remarks on the use of wax for effigies, com-
monly known as waxworks.
Waxen images of persons seem somehow or another to
have fallen into disrepute. For my own part, if wax can
be used to preserve the likeness of a person, I do not see
why it should not be as highly esteemed as marble. I
suppose it is not much thought of because of the waxen
heads of ladies with long hair we see in the barbers’ shops.
Waxen babies, pigs, ears, hands, arms, eyes, noses, &c.,
are hung up as ex votos at the present day in churches in
France.
I have, lately examined very carefully the oldest wax-
worksin England. These, I need hardly say, are the wax-
works now in Westminster Abbey, and which to my mind
are national relics worthy of the greatest respect and
reverence. The following account is given in a description
of the Abbey, its monuments and curiosities, printed by
‘J. Newbery, at the Bible and Sun, in St. Paul’s Church-
yard, 1754.’ In this curious pamphlet, the Westminster
Abbey waxworks are called the ‘ Play of the Dead Volks’
(sic) and the ‘ Ragged Regiment.’
The following is the account of the condition of these
waxworks one hundred and twenty years ago :—
‘Over this chapel (Islip, otherwise St. Erasmus) is a
chantry, in which are two large wainscot-presses, full of
the effigies of princes and others of high quality buried in
the Abbey. These effigies resembled the deceased as
nearly as possible, and were wont to be exposed at the
funerals of our princes and other great personages in open
chariots, with their proper ensigns of royalty or honour
appended. Those that are here laid up are in a sad
366 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
mangled condition; some stripped and others in tattered
robes, but all maimed or broken. The most ancient are
the least injured, by which it would seem as if the cost-
liness of their clothes had occasioned the ravage; for
the robes of. Edward VI., which were once of crimson
velvet, but now appear like leather, are left entire; but
those of Queen Elizabeth and King James I. ave entirely
stripped, as are all the rest of everything of value. In -
two handsome wainscot-presses are the effigies of King
William and Queen Mary and Queen Anne in good condi-
tion, and greatly admired by every eye that beholds
them.’
The figure of Cromwell is not here mentioned, but in
the account of his lying in state the effigy is described as
made to the life in wax, apparelled in velvet, gold lace,
and ermine. ‘This effigies (sic) was laid upon the bed of
state, and carried upon the hearse in funeral procession ;
both were then deposited in Westminster Abbey; but at
the Restoration the hearse was broken in pieces, and the
effigies was destroyed after hanging from a window at
Whitehall.’
When my father was Dean of Westminster, somehow
or other he seldom used to show visitors to the Abbey
into this curious room, and it is now only to be seen by
special order from the Dean. The visitor ascends through
a time-worn staircase into the chapel, and a most curious
sight then meets his eye. Set up against the wall are
very large, massive cases, not unlike big clock cases.
There are glasses in front of these, so that the figures
inside can well be seen. ‘As far as I could see, they are not
labelled except with chalk superscriptions.
° i 2 — oo ‘ b ? a . a Pe . Nit hl ota = ’ ae —_ a
IO Rati as tI RA tee ah ROM A Na Pg BFA AEE A RNG, 5 ERLE AE SOLO ETO ANGE a AGE A ESF GCE FIDE
an
THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 367
Dr. Stanley, Dean of Westminster, has, in his most
‘interesting ‘Memorials of Westminster Abbey,’ p. 340
(Murray, 1868), the following able observations on these
waxworks :—
~*Amongst the various accompaniments of great
funerals—the body lying in state, guarded by the nobles
of the realm ; the torchlight procession ; the banners and
arms of the deceased hung over the tomb—there was one
so peculiarly dear to the English public as to require a
short notice.
‘This was the herse—not, as now, the car which con-
veys the coffin, but a platform highly decorated with
black hangings, and containing a wa«en effigy of the
deceased person. It usually remained for a month in the
Abbey, near the grave, but in the case of sovereigns for a
much longer time.. It was the main object of attraction,
sometimes even in the funeral sermon. Laudatory verses
were attached to it with pins, wax, or paste. Of this kind
probably was Ben Jonson’s epitaph on Lady Pembroke :—
Underneath this sable herse
Lies the subject of all verse,
Sidney’s sister,’ &e.
They were ever highly esteemed as works of art.
‘Mr. Emanuel Decretz (Sergeant-painter to King
Charles I.) told me! in 1649 that the catafalco of King
James at his funerall (which is a kind of bed of state,
erected in Westminster Abbey, as Robert, Earl of Essex
had, Oliver Cromwell, and General Monke) was very
ingeniously designed by Inigo Jones, and that he made
1 Aubrey’s Letters and Lives, ii. 412.
368 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
the four heads of the caryatides of plaster of Paris, and
made the drapery of them of white callico, which was very —
handsome and very cheap, and showed as well as if they —
had been cutt out of white marble. ;
‘These temporary erections, planted here and there in
different parts of the Abbey, must of themselves have
formed a singular feature in its appearance. But the
most interesting portion of them was the “ lively effigy,”
which was there placed after having been carried in a
chariot before the body. This was a practice which has
its precedent, if not its origin, in the funerals of the great
men of the Roman Commonwealth. The one distinguish-
ing mark of a Roman noble was the right of having
figures with waxen masks, representing his ancestors,
carried at his obsequies and placed in his hall.
‘In England the royal funerals were, till the time of
Henry V., distinguished by the exhibition of the corpse
itself of the deceased sovereign. But even before that
time the practice of effigies had been adopted.
‘These wax figures were detached from the herses and
kept in the Abbey, generally near the graves of the
deceased, but were gradually drafted off into wainscot
presses above the Islip Chapel. Here they were seen in
Dryden’s time—
And now the presses open stand,
And you may see them all a-row.
‘In 1658 the following were the waxen figures thus
exhibited : —
Henry the Seventh and bis fair Queen,
Edward the First and his Queen,
3
5
%
¢.
rs
€
me
,
t
Pl EE ANS ep ROL ATE POOP
ge ee ee ee eae
THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 369
Henry the Fifth here stands upright,
And his fair Queen was this Queen,
The noble Prince, Prince Henry,
King James’s eldest son,
King James, Queen Anne, Queen Elizabeth,
And so this Chapel’s done.
‘With this agrees the curious notice of them in
1708 :—
‘And so we went on to see the ruins of majesty in the
women (sic, waxen ?) figures placed there by authority.
As soon as we had ascended half a score stone steps in a
dirty, cobweb hole, and in old, worm-eaten presses, whose
doors flew open at our approach, here stood Edward III.
as they told us, which was a broken piece of waxwork, a
battered head, and a straw-stuffed body, not one-quarter
covered with rags. His beautiful queen stood by, not
better in repair; and so, the number of half a score kings
and queens, not near so good figures as the King of the
Beggars make, and all the begging crew would be ashamed
of their company. The rear was brought up with Good
Queen Bess, with the remnants of an old dirty ruff, and
nothing else to cover her.
‘Stow also describes the effigies of Edward III. and
Philippa, Henry IV. and Catherine, Henry VII. and
Elizabeth of York, Henry, Prince of Wales, Elizabeth,
James I., and Queen Anne as shown in the chamber close
to Islip Chapel. Of these the wooden blocks, entirely
denuded of any ornament, still remain.
‘But there are eleven figures in a tolerable state of
preservation. That of Queen Elizabeth was, as we have
seen, already worn out in 1708, and the existing figure is,
BB
370 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBRY. ©
doubtless, the one made by order of the Chapter to com-
memorate the bicentenary of the foundation of the Colle-
giate Church in 1760. As late as 1783 it stood in Henry
VII.’s Chapel. The effigy of Charles II. used to stand over
his grave, and close beside him that of General Monk.
The former is tolerably perfect, and seems to have early
attracted. attention from the contrast with his battered
predecessors. Monk used to stand beside his monument
by Charles II.’s grave. The effigy is in too dilapidated a
condition to be shown, but the remnants of his armour
exist still. The famous cap, in which the contributions
for the showmen were collected, is gone.’
The first effigy to which I made my bow was King
Charles II., dressed in magnificent raiment. The wax of
the face is somewhat bleached by the sun, but I should
imagine from the pictures that the portrait is exceedingly
good. The robes once must have been very grand; the
lace on the king’s breast is of the finest Venetian point.
The king has long black hair; he was evidently a dark-
looking man, but one expects that any moment his fea-
tures will break out into a jovial smile. King Charles II.
died a.D. 1685—nearly two hundred years ago. If this is
the original effigy used at his funeral, it has lasted very
well indeed. Immediately opposite King Charles II.
stands, also in a large case like a clock case, the Duchess
of Buckinghamshire, with one son as a child. She was
the daughter of James II.; she died in 1743, and the
waxen effigies of herself and her son were prepared for
her funeral. It is difficult, on account of the bad light,
exactly to make out her dress, but it appeared to be very
magnificent, though dust-covered, and in excellent pre-
-THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 371
servation, although nearly one hundred and forty years
old. The other surviving effigies are those of William and
Mary, Queen Anne, the beautiful Duchess of Richmond,
of Charles II.’s time, the Earl of Chatham, and Lord
Nelson; the last two figures not being genuine funeral
effigies, but added as attractions to the collection.
372
THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON.
PASSOVER CUSTOMS OF LONDON JEWS.
Havine heard that a great number of small fry of fresh-
water fish were being sent to the Jews’ fish-markets in
London, between Bishopsgate and Whitechapel, in the
spring of 1878, I made time, during the sitting of the
Committee on Mr. Mundella’s Fresh-water Fishery Bill, |
now a most useful Act of Parliament, to inspect for myself,
in order to see how far the proposed provisions of this Act
might interfere with the food supply of those wonderful
people the Jews. My visit was paid just before the Feast
of the Passover was about to commence.
This part of London is simply a Jewish colony, and
the general appearance of the place and people gave me
the idea of a strange foreign town. I seldom heard ~ a
English spoken at all, in the streets or between buyer
and seller, but a language was used in conversation quite
strange tome. I wondered if it might be Hebrew. The
streets were very narrow and very dirty; the shops also
had a strange look about them; the advertisements in
the windows appeared to be in Hebrew, not in English.
The bakers seemed very busy; their shop windows were
filled with round thin cakes, about twelve inches across ;
these are the Passover cakes. Several men were packing
Se)
THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON. 37
these cakes in half-hundredweights, probably to send to
Jews in other parts of England.
Another species of food I observed was quite new to
me, namely, cucumbers, apparently boiled and placed in
salt and water, selling at a penny or halfpenny a slice ;
I cannot think how any one can eat them. The fried
fish shops were very abundant; the fish was sold cold,
and looked excellent: of course I tasted this; it was
plaice, cut into junks, and sold for a penny and twopence
ajunk. This fish is, I believe, first dipped in batter, and
then fried in boiling oil; but this cannot be quite all,
‘because the fish had a nice delicate taste of almonds;
perhaps it may be almond oil that is used, or essence of
almonds with salad oil. Halibut, as well as plaice, seems
to be a very favourite fish with the Jews, but it is more
expensive. Halibut is considered by very many people
to be superior to any other sea fish.
Some of the shops sold fowls. I observed that all the
fowls sold were very old, many of the hens having long
spurs; I understand that a Jew or Jewess will always
buy fat fowls, no matter what their age may be; they buy
for weight, if for nothing else. The same rule applies to
old ducks and geese—they must have weight: they
probably have some peculiar way of cooking these old
fowls. When they buy live fowls, they take them to
their butcher, and pay a penny or twopence to have them
killed: there are persons employed purposely to kill the
beasts and other animals. The bullock is not slaughtered
in the same way that is usual in ordinary slaughter-
houses ; according to the Jewish religion, the beast must
die from its throat being cut, instead of being knocked on
374 THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON.
the head. The slaughterer of the cattle must be a Jew.
‘London Labour and London Poor’ tells us, ‘Two
slaughterers are appointed by the Jewish authorities of
the synagogue, and they can employ others, who must
likewise be Jews: if there is any trace of disease in the
‘animal, the meat is pronounced unfit for the food of the
Jews, and is sold to the Christians. To the parts exposed
for sale, when the slaughtering has been according to
the Jewish law, there is attached a leaden seal, stamped
in Hebrew characters with the name of the examining
party sealing. The meat killed by a Christian is called
tryfer; that killed by the Jews is called kosher. Ona
Saturday there is cold fish for breakfast and supper;
indeed, a Jew would pawn his shirt off his back rather
than go without fish then, and in holiday time he will
have it; it is not considered a holiday unless there is fish.
The thing that struck me most was the custom of the
Jewish women wearing wigs. When standing at the
corner J counted no less than nine Jewesses wearing wigs.
Some of these wigs were brown and some black. They
were apparently not worn for show purposes; some were
low down on the forehead, some all awry, and some at the
back of the head. I cannot conceive how the Jewesses
can wear these hideous wigs. I believe this custom of
wearing wigs is not confined to the poorer classes.
Statistics inform us that thirty-five thousand Jews
reside in England; of these about eighteen thousand
live in London. Of all curious places in London com-
mend me to the Jewish fish-market in Petticoat Lane.
My learned friend Dr. Adler, the eminent Jewish
Minister, and son of the chief Rabbi, wrote me to the
os) CW nett aati nae et ior 48
THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON. ts Wat
_ following effect :—‘ We Jews eat fresh-water fish simply
because we like them, and because the poor can afford
to buy them better than meat, which is more expensive.
We eat cucumbers simply because we regard them as a
delicacy, and most of our poor come from Holland and
Germany, where everybody eats cucumbers.
‘The origin of eating fresh-water fish and cucumbers
_ may possibly be derived from the fifth verse of the elev-
enth chapter of Numbers: “We remember the fish,
which we did eat in Egypt freely ; the cucumbers, and the
melons, and the leeks, and the onions, and the garlick.”
‘With reference to the wigs worn by the Jewish
women, these wigs are only worn by married women,
mostly Polish. The object is to cover the hair go as not
to be so attractive as before marriage.
‘Our Passover is the eating of unleavened bread, but
the Paschal lamb is not offered any more, as the Temple
is destroyed.
‘The language you heard in the market was not
Hebrew; Hebrew is not spoken any more as a living
language. The conversations you heard were carried on
in a kind of German or Dutch mixed up with a few
Hebrew words. The advertisements in the shop windows
were not Hebrew, but German in Hebrew letters. A few
Hebrew words are used, such as kosher, “that which is
lawful to eat.” Meat of an animal that has died with-
out being properly slaughtered, or suffering from any
disease, is called tryfer.’
376
THE MANATEE.
It is very satisfactory to find that the science of natural
history gets more and more popular year by year. This
fact, I think, is obvious, inasmuch as it now pays to bring —
to this country, for purely show purposes, rare and valu-
able creatures from even the most distant parts of the
world.
Five manatees have been exhibited in this country.
The first was caught in 1866 in the Maroni River, Suri-
nam, and Mr. Clarence Bartlett went out on purpose to
bring it over. This animal was called by the familiar
name of Patcheley, and he became by handling quite
tame. Mr. Bartlett was in the habit of going into the
water to feed him from a bottle containing milk, of which
he was very fond. With a great deal of trouble Mr. Bart-
lett brought the animal to this country, but, unfortunately,
not alive.
The name manatee has been given to this animal on
account of the hand-like shape of the swimming paws,
hence manatee. This curious creature is found in the
great waters of South America, especially in the Amazon,
and in Africa. It is also called Vacca marina, or sea-
cow. I have consulted my old friend Gesner’s Icones
1
«agi. esi
os -=s == en
-
ot ale ig Naeem
THE MANATEE. SEL
Anvmalium (Heidelberg, 1606). He gives a wonderful
picture of the sea-cow—meer-ochs in German. Of
course Gesner had never seen a manatee or sea-cow; but
what easier than to make one from imagination? We
find, therefore, a very rude drawing of a cow’s head pro-
jecting out of the water. The cow has the mouth open,
as if in the act of bellowing, and has a splendid beard and
dilated nostyils.
The next manatee came to the Zoological Gardens in
August 1875. This animal was sent over by Mr. R. Swain,
from Pin Point, Demerara, South America. The small
seal pond was prepared for her reception by filling it with
fresh water warmed to a proper temperature. The poor
manatee seemed to much enjoy her bath after such a
long sea voyage. |
I do not recollect ever having seen a more interesting
animal. The manatee belongs to the class Sirenia, but
it is very puzzling to know what she is, whether a pachy-
derm or a cetacean. I think she may be said to be a
little of both. She is purely an aquatic animal, and
when seen in the water her head reminds one of
something between a mole and a pig. Her body is ter-
minated by a large tail, the shape of a lady’s fan. She
swims with it moving it up and down, with the same
action as a porpoise, and not sideways like a fish. Take
a pig, tie his hind legs and curly tail, and flatten them
into a broad, flat. appendage, like a beaver’s tail; turn
his fore-feet into paddles. like a turtle’s flippers; cut
off his ears, give him valvular nostrils like a seal, re-
duce his eyes to one-fourth, and then you will have a
manatee. The people in Demerara call it the ‘sea-pig.’
378 THE MANATEE.
The eyelids are very peculiar; they are formed of circular
muscular rings, like india-rubber rings. The hairy-eared —
rhinoceros has the same peculiar formation of eyelids.
The manatee’s eyes are very minute, and of a dull blue
colour.
Mr. Bartlett was much pleased to find the manatee
feed so well; she would eat lettuces and vegetable
marrows all day. She got quite tame like a sheep, and
would follow Mr. Bartlett round the pond and eat from his
hand. It was very interesting to remark the extreme
quiet with which this animal, one can hardly say swims,
but rather gently glides through the water. Its skin is
covered with two kinds of hair, soft and bristly. The
appearance of the back reminds one of a prickly pear.
- The nostrils are most peculiar; they are situated at the
extreme end of the nose, and the two valves seem to rise
from the inside, with exactly the same quiet motion as
does the hydraulic lift when it rises level with the plat-
form at the Great Western station; or, again, its action
may be likened to the working of the lid of the nest
of the trap-door spider. She was supposed to be about
half grown. The length of a full-grown manatee is from
fourteen to sixteen feet, and the weight would average
about 1,500 lbs. This manatee at the Gardens was seven
feet two inches long, and weighed about 4 ewt.
The price asked for the manatee was 4001.
The tail contains a considerable quantity of oil; the
natives chop it up and expose it to the sun, they then
boil it and get oil, which is pure and not rancid. The
old pharmacists prescribed this to cool the blood. It is
said to taste like oil of almonds. Dr. Murie weighed the
THE MANATEE. 379
fat of this animal for dissection, and found it weigh twenty-
four lbs. ten ounces, about one-nineteenth of the total
weight of the animal.
Another manatee was exhibited at the Westminster
Aquarium in 1878. It was captured off an island at the
mouth of the Essiquibo River, British Guiana. Since
then two young manatees have been exhibited at the
Brighton Aquarium.
The flesh of the manatee is considered a great delicacy ;
when roasted it has the taste of pork with a flavour of veal.
It is said to retain its freshness much longer than other
meat in a tropical climate, where meat generally putrefies
in twenty-eight hours, and to be therefore well adapted for
salting or pickling, as the salt has time to penetrate the
meat before it is spoiled. The Indians hunt the manatee
with harpoons. The cry, Mr. Bates reports, is something
like the bellowing of an ox. The natives look upon the
manatee as a supernatural animal, because it suckles its
young as a human mother does her baby. The Indians
say the milk is good.
The manatees are said to be whale-like in habit, and
when at home to leap out of the water in a whale-like
manner; and they were formerly abundant in the en-
trances of the Orinocoand the Amazon. They also ascend
the rivers and take up their abode in the fresh-water
lakes. Formerly they were very abundant in Cayenne,
where the flesh was sold for 3d. per pound; but this
caused them to be nearly exterminated, like the unhappy
dodo.
The anatomy of the manatee is another instance of the
adaptation of structure to the physical conditions under
380 THE MANATEE.
which the animal has to pass its existence. As a writer
remarks, ‘The power of swimming which these animals
possess not only renders them quite safe from those
casualties to which ruminant animals would be subject
when the rains and inundations come, but it gives
them a facility and a range in their migrations in quest
of food which not even the fleetest of the antelopes, or
any of the Mammalia which walk upon the earth, can
possess. These last are hemmed in by the mountain
ridges, by the deserts, and even by the larger rivers, and
their march is laborious, and their food is often scanty.
The manatee, on the other hand, launched upon the
water, buoyant, and at home in that element, can, with-
out any fatigue, migrate for thousands of miles whenever
such migrations become necessary. In these extended
marches they are not restrained even by the sea; for
although it is not very probable that vegetable feeders
will range the breadth of the ocean, yet it is certain that
these animals often pass along the shores to very con-
siderable distances.
‘They also have this advantage, that they are far
more certain of provisions by the way than the walking
animals which migrate on land. In tropical countries
there is never any barrenness if there is water, whether
that water be a lake, a stream, or the sea; and thus the
animals in question can always approach the bank and
feed whenever a supply is required.’
In that admirable book, ‘The Naturalist on the
Amazons,’ Mr. Bates gives us the following account :—
‘They harpooned a manatee, or Vaccw marina. On
this last-mentioned occasion we made quite a holiday;
THE MANATEE. 381
the canoe was stopped for six or seven hours, and all
turned out into the forest to help to skin and cook the
animal. The meat was cut into cubical slabs, and each
person skewered a dozen or so of those on a long stick.
Fires were made, and the spits stuck in the ground, and
slanted over the flames to roast. A drizzling rain fell all
the time, and the ground around the fires swarmed with
stinging ants, attracted by the entrails and slime which
were scattered about. The meat had somewhat the
taste of very coarse pork ; but the fat, which lies in thick
layers between the lean parts, is of a greenish colour,
and of a disagreeable, fishy flavour. The animal was a
large one, measuring nearly ten feet in length and
nine in girth at the broadest part. The manatee is
one of the few objects which excite the dull wonder
and curiosity of the Indians, notwithstanding its com-
monness.
‘The fact of its suckling its young at the breast,
although an aquatic animal resembling a fish, seems to
strike them as something very strange. The animal,
as it lay on its back, with its broad rounded head and
muzzle, tapering body, and smooth, thick, lead-coloured
skin, reminded me of those Egyptian tombs which are
made of dark, smooth stone, and shaped to the human
figure.’
I learn from Kirby’s ‘Bridgewater Treatise’ that
Roupell, a traveller in Africa, discovered a species of
dugong (the dugong closely resembles the manatee) in
the Red Sea, and he is of opinion that it was the skin of
this animal with which the Jews were commanded to
cover the Tabernacle.
a
382 THE MANATEE.
In the ‘Proceedings of the Zoological Society,’ vol.
viii. p. 127, is a paper by Dr. Murie on the ‘ Anatomy
of the Manatee,’ which I consider one of the best he
ever published. The skin, says Dr. Murie, claims for
the manatee a kindred with the pachyderms. The an-
terior face, and particularly the under side, has a very
warty surface and pitted structure. This skin is exces-
sively thick and strong.
The Rev. J. G. Wood writes: ‘So thick and strong
is it that the wretched steel of which the native
weapons are composed—namely, the machetes, or sword
knives—are quite unable to penetrate the hide. Nothing
is so effectual a weapon for this service as a common
English three-cornered file, which is fastened to a spear-
shaft, and pierces through the tough hide with the
greatest ease. The skin of the manatee is so thick that
it can be cut into strips like the too-celebrated ‘ cow-
hide ” of America, which is manufactured from the skin
of the hippopotamus.’
The upper lip of the manatee is full and cleft in the
middle. It is covered inside with tufts of stiff bristles.
Dr. Murie considers that these bristles inside the mouth
correspond to and are the homologues of the whalebone
in the mouth of the whale. These bristles are pre-
hensile, as they will, I find, gently clasp one’s fingers
when the manatee can be persuaded to take a lettuce
from the hand. I have not had an opportunity of
examining the skull of a manatee. Professor Owen
in his ‘Odontology’ has figured the teeth. He says
they are thirty-six in number, nine on each side of
both jaws, They are all implanted by two fangs, which
THE MANATEE. 383
- enlarge as they descend and bifurcate at the extremity.
The professor continues, ‘ The shape, structure, and mode
of implantation of the molars of the manatee quite
accord with the pachydermal type, and herein more
especially with the tapir and dinotherium,’ a very curious
extinct animal, about whose habits very little is known.
384
THE GREAT SHA-SERPENT.
In June 1877 the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty
received official reports from the officers of the royal
yacht ‘Osborne,’ relative to a large marine animal
seen off Sicily; the documents were forwarded to the
Right Hon. R. A. Cross, Secretary of State for the
Home Department, who did me the honour to request my
opinion on the matter. This subject being of so much in-
terest and importance as bearing on the question of the ex-
istence or non-existence of the great sea-snake, I obtained
the opinions of Professor Owen, Mr. A. D. Bartlett, of the
Zoological Gardens, Captain David Gray, of the whaling
ship ‘Eclipse,’ Peterhead, and Mr. Henry Lee. These
papers, together with my own opinion, were forwarded to
the Lords of the Admiralty, who kindly gave me permis-
sion in the interests of science to publish them, together
with the evidence of the officers of H.M. yacht ‘ Osborne.’
Commander Pearson, of the Royal yacht ‘ Osborne,’ in
forwarding the accounts of the three officers of that yacht,
who saw the sea monster off the coast of Sicily on June
2, 1877, writes:—‘ I myself saw the fish through a tele-
scope, but at too great a distance (about 400 yards) to
be able to give a detailed description; but I distinctly
saw the seal-shaped head, of immense size, large flappers,
and part of a huge body.’
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 385
Lieutenant Haynes writes, under date, ‘ Royal Yacht
<* Osborne,” Gibraltar, June 6 ; ’—‘ On the evening of June
2, the sea being perfectly smooth, my attention was first
ealled by seeing a ridge of fins above the surface of the
water, extending about thirty feet, and varying from five
to six feet in height. On inspecting it by means of a
telescope, at about one and a half cables’ distance,! I dis-
tinctly saw a head, two flappers, and about thirty feet of
an animal’s shoulder. The head, as nearly as I could
judge, was about six feet thick, the neck narrower, about
four to five feet, the shoulder about fifteen feet across,
and the flappers each about fifteen feet in length. The
movements of the flappers were those of a turtle, and the
animal resembled a huge seal, the resemblance being
strongest about the back of the head. I could not see
the length of the head, but from its crown or top to just
below the shoulder (where it became immersed) I should
reckon about fifty feet. The tail end I did not see, it
being under water—unless the ridge of fins to which my
attention was first attracted, and which had disappeared
by the time I got a telescope, was really the continuation
of the shoulder to the end of the body. The animal’s
head was not always above water, but was thrown upwards,
remaining above for a few seconds at a time, and then
disappearing. There was an entire absence of “ blowing ”
or “ spouting.” I herewith enclose a sketch (A) showing
the view of the “ ridge of fins,” and (B) of the animal in
the act of propelling itself by its two fins.’
Lieutenant Douglas M. Forsyth writes, under date,
‘ Royal Yacht “ Osborne,” at sea, June 4, 1877 : ’—‘ At five
1 A cable’s length is 240 yards,
CC
388 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
p-m. on the 2nd inst., while passing Cape St. Vito, north
coast of Sicily, I observed a large, black-looking object on
the starboard quarter, distant about two cables; and on
examining it with a telescope, I found it to be a huge
monster, having a head about fifteen to twenty feet in
length. The breadth I could not observe. The head
was round, and full at the crown. The animal was slowly
swimming in a south-easterly direction, propelling itself
by means of two large flappers or fins, somewhat in the
manner of a seal. I also saw a portion of the body of the
animal, and that. part was certainly not under forty-five
or fifty feet in length.’
Mr. Moore, engineer of the royal yacht ‘ Osborne,’
writes :—‘ When looking over the starboard quarter of
the ship, my attention was called by observing an uneven
ridge of what appeared to me to be the fins of a fish above
the surface of the water, about a cable’s length distance
from the ship. They varied in height, as near as I can
judge, from seven to eight feet above water, and extended
about forty feet along the surface. Not having a telescope
with me, I regret Iam unable to give a further descrip-
tion.’
I submitted these reports to Professor Owen, who sent
me the following as his opinion on the matter:—‘I have
carefully perused and considered the documents from the
Admiralty and Home Office which you submitted to me.
First as to Captain Pearson’s letter. The objects or phe-
nomena may have been of a nature unknown to the ob-—
servers, but were not necessarily caused by a monster,
The appearances may not have been caused by a “ fish.”
The expression “ seal shaped head,” “ flappers,” &c., denote
H
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 389
rather a cetacean than a “ fish ” or “ monster ;” but, viewed
at the distance given, the ideas thereby excited and ex-
pressed are of no help or value to the naturalist. Secondly,
as to Lieutenant Haynes’ letter:—Phenomena noted
through a telescope, at the distance given, by one not
conversant with natural history, are very seldom available
to one who is; the present case is no exception. The
period during which the object was watched, or during
which uninterrupted observation of the phenomena was
made, should have been noted, in order to found an
opinion of the bearing of Lieutenant Haynes’ remarks as
to the motion of the animal’s head. Thirdly, as to Lieu-
tenant Forsyth’s letter:—A. seal propels itself chiefly by
its hind pair of flippers, which stretch backward beyond
the tail, to part of which they are attached. Fourthly,
as to Mr. Moore’s letter :—Compare this with Lieutenant
Forsyth’s statement, and with Lieutenant Haynes’ state-
ment.
‘The discrepancies in the records of the watchers of
the same phenomena show the difficulty of exact obser-
vation at the distances and under the circumstances of
the case, both ship and object or objects being on the
move; and remarks thereon by observers not conversant
with natural history, and so situated, preclude the forma-
tion of any opinion worth recording of the nature of the
object or objects causing the phenomena as interpreted
by the foregoing witnesses.
‘But although the statements and terms applied may
be insufficient to enable the naturalist to recognise the
subject thereof, they by no means afford ground for con-
cluding that what was seen was afforded by an object
390 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
unknown and unrecorded in natural history. There are
no grounds for calling it a “sea monster.” I beg to call
attention to the paragraph concluding the Manual of
Zoology in the Admiralty Manual of Scientific Enquiry,
12mo, 3rd ed., 1859 :—‘* When an object is seen afloat,
and attracts notice by its magnitude or other peculiarity,
and is not captured, its nearest approach to the ship, its
mode, course, and rate of progression, and the parts
actually recognisable should be noted at the time with
the utmost accuracy. If practicable, a boat should be put
off for close observation and possible capture. If the ob--
server nas not the zoological knowledge, or the oppor-
tunity for exact inspection, requisite for determining the
species from tne phenomena, he should abstain from
giving the object any special name. Supposing it to be
an animal, a shot fired, if even it do not hit, may so
alarm the creature as to cause some sudden movement
which may reveal more of its true nature.” ’
Mr. Bartlett’s opinion is as follows :—
‘In undertaking to write my opinion upon the state-
ments made in this report, I must endeavour as far as pos-
sible to divest myself of the knowledge of all previous”
accounts that have from time to time been published upon
this subject.
‘Firstly, I think few men holding themselves as
honourable and trustworthy officers in Her Majesty’s Ser-
vice would risk their high position by any false or fabri-
cated story of this nature. I will, therefore, take it for
granted that they described to the best of their ability
what they saw.
‘Secondly, I have now to consider what appears to me
= a
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 391
one very simple matter. All persons, by continual prac-
tice in the use of their eyes on land and at sea, acquire
a great power in distinguishing and recognising the
objects they have constantly under observation, and per-
sons accustomed to the sea are most remarkable in this,
to them, most important matter; men always on the
look-out notice the smallest as well as more important
objects, during the long periods they pass watching for
something to turn up, and are not likely to mistake the
ordinary and common occurrence of the appearance of
seals, porpoises, sharks, or whales, for some previously un-
seen or unknown monster of the deep.
‘I am therefore willing to admit and believe that some
large animal or animals have presented themselves within
sight of the officers of the “ Osborne.”
‘My difficulty is to offer some explanation, and ascribe
to some kind of animal the description laid before me. It
is evidently not a serpent. According to all known species
of serpent, none of them have fins or flippers or any exter-
nal organs used for swimming, nor does the description
agree with any of the seals or sea-lions, as no animal of
this kind has fins on the back, nor do they use the eave
pers in front while swimming.
‘Sketch (8) at first looks like a monster turtle, but
sketch (A) at once dispels this idea.
‘T have now to consider in what respect it resembles the
whales and porpoises, and find it quite impossible to
pelieve that men who must be well acquainted with the
movements and frequent appearance of these creatures
could so distort and magnify any of the known kinds into
the object they have described.
392 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
‘Lastly, I come to the sharks. The largest specimens
known fail, however, to give me any hope of satisfying
myself or any one else that any number of sharks could
have led to the report furnished by the officers of the
‘¢ Osborne.”
‘The description fails entirely in so many important
points, that one cannot help being struck with the dis-
similar appearances presented.
‘I may remark that the fins upon the back give
strength to the idea that sharks were the nearest approach
to the creature or creatures seen; but the head and neck
described at once dispel the thought that any kind of
shark could, by any possibility, be mistaken for what was
seen.
‘That the sketch (A) represents a sgt of fins like
the back fins of sharks; supposing two or three sharks
to be in company, would easily be concluded, did not the
great height (six or eight feet out of the water) at
once dispose of the probability of any known shark hay-
ing fins of these dimensions.!
‘TI now feel called upon to answer the question, What
was it?
‘IT must, in reply, admit that Iam unable to identify
the figures and description with any known animal. With
the dimensions given, it is most conclusive—in fact, proof
positive—that. no known species of animal was seen, the
dimensions being so extraordinary that they admit of no
doubt but that the creature is entirely unknown to
1 There are Finner whales and large grampuses with a dorsal fin
from four to six feet high. See Dewhurst, Cetacea. The Selache, or
basking shark, also has a back fin between five and six feet high, corre-
sponding with the dimensions given by Lieutenant Haynes.
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 393
naturalists. But I fully believe in the existence of
animals in the deep at present unknown either by
specimens or by perfect descriptions ; not only do I accept
as true the statements made to the best of the judgment
and belief of the parties who have made them, but doubt-
less from time to time other wonderful sights have pre-
sented themselves, and have remained unrecorded from
fear of derision and misbelief; but this, as seen at 400
yards on a clear day, appears so perfectly easy of observa-
tion that I cannot doubt the correctness of the statement
in sketch (B).
‘When we consider the vast extent of the ocean, its
great depth, the rocky, cavernous nature of the bottom—
of many parts of which we know really nothing,—who can
say what may have been hidden for ages, and may still
remain a mystery for generations yet to come? for we
have evidence on land that there exist some of the largest
mammals, probably by thousands, of which only one
solitary individual has been caught or brought to notice.
I allude to the hairy-eared two-horned rhinoceros (R.
lasvotis ), captured in 1868 at Chittagong (where it was
found stranded in the mud), and now known as an in-
habitant of the Zoological Gardens.
‘T could find other instances, but content myself by
stating that this animal remains unique, and no part or
portion was previously known to exist In any museum at
home orabroad. We have here an instance of the existence
of a species of rhinoceros, as large nearly as the hippo-
potamus, found on the continent of India, of which
country we in England are supposed to know so much,
where for many years collectors and naturalists have
394 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
worked and published lists of all the animals met with,
and here they have hitherto failed to meet with or obtain
any knowledge of this great beast. |
‘May I not, therefore, presume that, in the vast and
mighty ocean, animals, perhaps of nocturnal habits (and
therefore never, except by some extraordinary accident, |
forced into sight), may exist, whose form may resemble
the extinct reptiles whose fossil remains we find in such
abundance. i
‘The form indicated and described strongly resembles
some of the extinct reptilian characters, and reminds one
of the models of fish-lizards and other animals described
and constructed by Waterhouse Hawkins, under the
direction of Professor Owen, and exhibited in the grounds
of the Crystal Palace at Sydenham ; and, as far as I am
able to judge from the evidence before me, I have reason
to believe that aquatic reptiles of vast size have been seen
and described by those persons who have endeavoured to
explain what they have witnessed.
‘One thing is certain, that many well-known reptiles
have the power of remaining for long periods (months, in
fact) at the bottom, under water or imbedded in soft mud,
being so provided with organs of circulation and respira-
tion that they need not come to the surface to breathe.
The large crocodiles, alligators, and turtles have this
power, and I see no valid reason to doubt but that there
may and do exist, in the unknown regions of the ocean,
creatures so constructed. .
‘It may be argued that, if such animals still live,
they must from time to time die, and their bodies would
float, and their carcasses would be found, or parts of them
‘fie
CE
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 395
would wash on shore. To this I say, however reasonable
such arguments may appear, that with most animals that
die or are killed in the water, they sink at first to the
bottom, where they are likely to have the flesh and soft
parts devoured by other animals, such as crustacea, fishes,
&c., &e.; and sinking in the deep, the bones, being
heavier than the other parts, may soon become imbedded,
and thus concealed from sight.
‘In conclusion, I cannot shut my eyes to the many
reports and statements made from time immemorial by
persons far above suspicion of fraud or deception, and
whose lives have been, for the most part, spent at sea,
and whose knowledge of the appearances of all marine
animals commonly seen entitles them to our most serious
consideration.
‘These more recent instances recorded by honest and
trustworthy persons satisfy me that .it is not only unfair,
but unwise, and a great mistake, to disregard and throw
overboard, as it were, the evidence brought by these dif-
ferent observers, simply because we cannot at present
define exactly, by specimens or otherwise, the exact nature
of the creatures that have been observed.’
The following is Mr. Henry Lee’s opinion :-—
‘The evidence of “great sea-serpents,” or other so-
ealled “*marine monsters,” having been occasionally seen,
is such as would be regarded as valid and cogent in any
court of justice. The witnesses are trustworthy as to
character, and competent by training and experience.
The officers of Her Majesty’s Navy are incapable of com-
bining together to officially and intentionally promulgate
falsehood; and they and the seamen under their command
396 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT,
are too much accustomed to the sights of the sea to be >
eusily misled, either to greatly exaggerate the dimensions
of an animal in view, or to be so entirely deceived by
appearances as not to recognise one already known to
them. It appears to me, therefore, that, with such testi-
mony before us, incredulity (which is more frequently
than credence the result of want of knowledge) is un-
justifiable; and that the statements and descriptions of
such witnesses ought to be frankly accepted and carefully
considered, with a view to satisfactory explanation, if that
be possible.
‘It should be remembered that the existence of gi-
gantic cuttle-fishes was popularly disbelieved until within
the past five or six years, during which period several
specimens—some of them fifty feet in total length—have
been taken, and all doubts upon that subject have been
removed.
‘In more than one case the appearance of the “ sea-
monsters ” described by masters of merchant vessels
almost exactly accords with that of these great squids.
These decapods are pelagic in their habits, and must not
be confounded, as they too often are, with the octopods,
which are rock-dwellers.
‘In another case I agree with Professor Owen and
Captain Gray, that the appearance of a whale attacked by
a sea-serpent, as seen by the crew of the barque “ Pauline,”
on July 8, 1875, in lat. 5° 13’ S., long9367 Weer ae
possibly be attributed to the movements of two whales
rolling over and over. But the animal described by Com-
mander Pearson and the officers of the Royal yacht
(Ysborne,” and that seen by Captain McQuhae of H.M.S8.
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 397
“ Dedalus” in 1848, do not come within the scope of
either of these suppositions. Lieutenant Haynes and
Mr. Forsyth report that the former had flappers fifteen
feet long, the movements of which were like those of
a turtle; and Captain McQuhae says of the latter that
it kept its head, which was, “without any doubt,” that
of a snake, constantly about four feet above the surface
of the sea; that there was, at the very least, sixty. feet
of the animal @ fleur deau, and that it passed so near
to the vessel’s quarter that, although it was swimming
at the rate of from twelve to fifteen miles an hour, if
it had been a man of his acquaintance he could easily
have recognised his features with the naked eye. Neither
whales nor sharks use their pectoral fins, or flippers, to
swim with—their sole organ of propulsion is the tail;
neither do they uplift out of water a head like that of a
snake. I believe, therefore, that in both of these in-
stances an animal has been seen which is either totally
unknown to science, or which has hitherto been believed
to be extinct.
‘Other appearances described cannot be explained
away as having been produced by sharks, whales, seals,
cuttles, ribbon-fish, or logs of wood covered with barnacles
and seaweed; and to insist on attributing them to one of
these, or some other familiar object, is to assume that the
stay-at-home naturalist has perfect cognizance of every
existing murine animal of large size, and that the sea-
going eye-witness is so inexperienced and uninstructed
that his assertion that what he saw was none of these is
worthless. I cannot regard such an assumption in either
case as warrantable.
328 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT,
‘During the deep-sea dredgings of H.M.S. “ Light-
ning,” “ Porcupine,” and “ Challenger,” many new species of
Mollusca, and others which had been supposed to have been
extinct ever since the Chalk epoch, were brought to light ;
and by the deep-sea trawlings of the last-mentioned ship
there were drawn up from great depths fishes of unknown
species, and which could not exist near the surface, owing
to the distention and rupture of their air-bladder when
removed from the pressure of deep water.
‘I therefore think it by no means impossible—first,
that there may be gigantic marine animals unknown to
science, having their ordinary habitat in the great depths
of the sea, only occasionally coming to the surface, and
perhaps avoiding habitually the light of day; and, second,
that.there may still exist, though supposed to have been
long since extinct, some of the old sea-reptiles whose
fossil remains tell of their magnitude and habits, or others
of species unknown even to paleontologists.
‘The evidence is, to my mind, conclusive that enor-
mous animals, with which zoologists are at present un-
acquainted, exist in the “‘ great and wide sea; ” and I look
forward hopefully to the capture of one or more of them,
and the settlement of this vexed question.’
Such were the opinions I received. For many years
past I have taken the greatest interest in the reports of
so-called sea-snakes. There are certainly snakes in the
sea. These are generally very poisonous. They can be
known from land snakes by having a flat tail for the pur-
pose of swimming. I am, however, myself by no means
a believer in the so-called ‘ great sea-snake.’
If such an animal existed, upon what can it subsist ?
wget A 6 RES Ley} . ert as = Pears
—w
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 399
Where does it live? How does it multiply? and above
all, how is it that the remains, especially the bones, are
never found? Dead whales and whales’ bones are often
found, why not also the remains of the ‘sea-snakes’ (so
called) if they had any existence.
According to Professor Owen’s lectures, which I at-
tended years ago, unknown monsters at sea have, when
boats have been lowered to examine them, turned out to
be—First, small whales or porpoises ; second, seals; third
turtles, swimming respectively in Indian file one after the
other, probably in the act of migrating. Congers or a
line of congers may also have given origin to the story.
Some ‘sea-snakes’ have turned out to be logs of
wood, more or less covered with seaweed and barnacles,
or else trees floating with the roots uppermost. These
objects moving with the rise and fall of the waves would
give the appearance of a living animal with a mane.
The Gymmetrus, or ‘ Banks’ oar-fish,’ as well as the
ribbon-fish, is also liable to be taken for a sea-snake. A
bone, supposed to be that of a great sea-snake, was found
in Bermuda. It turned out to be the body spine of a
gymnetrus.
I have received from Nice a specimen of a ribbon-
fish. A coloured cast, as well as the specimen itself,
can be inspected in my ‘Museum of Economic Fish Cul-
ture,’ South Kensington.
In June 1877 a lady at Tenby saw an object which
she took to be a kind of sea-serpent. In course of
conversation with this lady, I came to the conclusion
that what she saw was a very large octopus or cuttle-
fish, swimming as it generally does, viz., with the pear-
’
400 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
shaped body going front, the long tentacles following on
behind. In my Museum of Fish Culture, South Ken-
sington, is a model of a huge cuttle cut out in wood,
quite large enough to give the appearance seen by this
_ lady.
In September 1872 I received through the Duke of
Marlborough, an account of a ‘ sea-serpent’ seen in Loch
Hourn, Scotland, on the 20th and 21st August 1872, by
the Rev. David Twopeny, late vicar of Stockbury, Kent,
and by the Rev. John Macrae, late minister of Glenelg,
Invernesshire, and his two daughters.
In describing this monster Mr. Twopeny says :—
‘We saw it repeatedly for two days together in the
Sound of Sleat, between Skye and the mainland, and in
the opening of Loch Hourn. The weather was still and
hot, and the sea like glass, and it is in such hot still days
in August that it is described as being seen in the large
Norwegian fiords, not often in the open sea. The head
always appeared first, then the part next to the head, and
then the rest, one bit after another, to the end. The
greatest number of these convolutions, as the books call
them, was eight including the head; they always ap-
peared regularly, one after the other, beginning next the
head, but when they disappeared they all sank together
leaving the head visible. It appeared to be basking and
often moved slowly, but sometimes with great rapidity,
and when at the most rapid rate, these convolutions dis-
appeared. We had three binocular glasses on board, and |
four people capable of observing.
‘When first we saw it, it was going on at a very
leisurely rate, and we saw it capitally, when it suddenly
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 401
turned and came towards us ; but when at about 100 yards
(as Mr. M. computed, and he is a very accurate observer),
it turned off. It was never nearer to us thanthis. They
were getting the cutter on with sweeps both days, and it
repeatedly came towards us, as if attracted by the rowing.
Once on the second day it rushed along at a great rate,
scarcely any of it visible, but making a tremendous rush
through the water, and the noise was quite audible on
board, the sea being quite still, and no wind. As to the
size, it must be a good deal guesswork, but if one of the
convolutions was six feet (and I can hardly think they
could be less), and the intervals between the same, and
six feet under water at the tail, it would be ninety-six
feet. Many of the Norwegian accounts compute it to be
considerably longer. They speak of its appearance being
like a string of barrels, and that is just what this looked
like. When I saw it the second day a good way off in
the opening of Loch Hourn, I thought that if there was
a vessel of that length it would be a large one. From
that point it was on the second day more or less within
sight of us till dusk, going on northwards, as we were
going, towards the Kyle Rhea Skye Ferry; and we heard
the next day that it passed the ferry with a rushing sound,
which was heard by the people on shore. This creature
is totally different from the animal which Captain
McQuhae saw in 1848, and which he declared was a sea-
serpent, but Professor Owen believed it to be a large seal.
There is scarcely a probability but that thisisaserpent. I
imagine it raises its back to sun itself, and then straightens
itself to go quickly. As it was approaching us at the nearest
I plainly saw the sea running off its back and the back
DD
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.. 403
of its head, as it does from a low flat rock which has been
submerged by a wave. F. M. was frightened out of her
wits, thinking it was coming down upow us; and between
that and the dangers of the sea—for she is always fright-
ened in a boat—she insisted afterwards: on being landed
at half-past two in the morning, and walked home by
herself in the moonlight, thirteen miles over wild moun-
tain tracks. Mr. M., who is a great naturalist, is greatly
interested about the creature. He has all his life been
going about on these seas, but never saw or heard any-
thing of the kind before. He knew Mr. Maclean, the
minister of Eig, who saw it off Coll in June 1808, and
says he was quite a man to be believed. They wellsknow
all the sea creatures here, whales, porpoises,. seals, and
say there is not the slightest resemblance in them to this
animal; and I have seen porpoises repeatedly, and very
different they are.
‘Last summer Mr. M. heard that some unknown
animal was rushing about Loch Derich with great rapidity
for several days, and he imagines it must have been such
a one as we saw.
‘A word more about “the beast,” as we call it here.
F. thought that the tumult of the water about the
neck was occasioned by a mane lashing about, and it might
well have been that, as far as the appearance of the water
went, but I saw no mane. The head appeared flattish,
and I saw distinctly under the chin, as shown in the
sketch. We could not see the eye. Mr. M. says very
truly, that I shall get the curves more accurately by draw-
ing the whole of the curves, under water and all. In the
sketch they are misshapen, and a little too high. These
pDzZ
404 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
convolutions rose easily, and not with a jerk— sometimes
three, then four—always one after the other, lying next the
head. The largest number I counted was six. Mr. M.,
who is very accurate, at one time counted eight, including
the head. On the second day, in the latter part of the
day, as we were going home in the Sound of Sleat, and the
beast at a distance, going about and about, but still the
same way, two of our party were both positive that they
saw a back fin stick up, when not a very great part of the
creature was visible. I did not see it, for I was perfectly
tired out, and not any longer observing. If the fin exists,
it must at other times have been in one of the submerged
parts. I am very curious about this creature, and should
much like to know what other people have seen. The first
day Mr. Lillingstone’s large schooner yacht was becalmed
all day in the Sound with us, that is, from one to ‘two
miles off, and I think the people on board must have seen
it. They had with them a steam launch, a noisy concern,
with which they were always going about, and that may
have kept it off.
‘At the distance we saw it the colour appeared black.
When the beast was first seen Kate M. said that the dark
ridges were waves caused by the motion of the animal,
such as might be in the wake of a steamer; but she soon
abandoned this opinion, and I was satisfied, as I looked
at it, that this was perfectly impossible. The creature was
to the north of us, opposite to the sun, which was shining
strongly at half-past twelve. No wave could have looked
like that on the light side, with the sun shining upon it ;
nor do I believe a wave could have been nearly so black
with the sun shining behind it. The moment the least frag-
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 405
ment appeared, it looked inky black, like the head, as dark
as a black slug, and totally different from anything in
the water; and I was quite sure that no wave, even in
shadow, could have looked like that. The next evening
we had a ripple in the still sea in long dark lines between —
us and the sun. I was curious to see how far the creature
_ would have been deeper in tone than these lines if he had
passed among them then; but the only time he appeared
just then was when he passed with an audible rush;
scarcely any part of him was visible, and that had water
rushing overit. Throughout, whenever he appeared, there
was the same blackness, like a black slug, different from
anything around. Two gentlemen have been here, from
Fig, who have been cruising about the Hebrides for several
weeks. One of them said that when he lived in Eig, he
believed he had struck a thing of this kind; but Mr. M.,
on his describing it, said he had no doubt it was a basking
shark, which is seen here sometimes. That creature has no
power of raising its back in curved ridges like this.’ !
A case was published in the papers in 1875 giving an
account of a ‘ great sea-snake’ attacking a whale. My
friend Captain Gray tells me that this appearance of the
snake curled round the whale was doubtless due to the
appearance and reappearance of the fins of a large whale,
rolling over and over. The hunchback whale has very long
fins, ten to fifteen feet in length, and sometimes when
they are playing about, they would present the same
appearance as was shown in the ‘ Illustrated London News’
some time since, in which was represented a serpent at~
tacking a whale.
1 An account of this appearance was also published by Rev. J.
Macrae and Rev. D. Twopeny in the Zvologist for May 1873.
= =
we
;
YaLVYM AHL WAOGVY YNILODLCOYd SNIA HLIM MUVHS PNINSVA ‘ey “OT
a
OMIT SFL Uh
THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 407
I must now give my opinion on the sea monster as
seen by the officers of the yacht ‘Osborne.’ That they
observed portions of some living creature or creatures is
quite evident, but query, What was its or their true nature ?
Possibly I may be wrong, but my theory is that the
phenomenon was caused by three or four basking sharks
swimming ina line one behind the other. The dorsal
and caudal or tail fins of these huye fish projecting above
the surface of the water might give the appearance shown
in the drawing opposite, which I have had made as an illus-
tration of my theory. It is a sketch of the basking shark
now at the British Museum. This specimen is twenty-
eight feet long, and the skin weighed over one ton. The
height of the dorsal fin was five feet three inches, length
of upper lobe of tail five feet nine inches, length of pec-
toral fin along anterior margin five feet three inches.! I
have drawn a line to show that if the fish were on the
surface of the water the dorsal and tail fins B and E would
project five or six feet into the air.”
1 Land and Water, vol. xx.,p. 177. The fins have now somewhat
shrunk.
2 The basking shark derives this name from its habit of remaining
at the surface of the water almost motionless basking in the sun. It is
sometimes called the sail-fish, from the ‘sail-like aspect of its dorsal
fin, which projects high out of water’ (Wood’s Natural History). It
is often found in the Mediterranean. Spallanzani describes several
kinds, and says they are found of great size in the summer in the Straits
of Messina. Sometimes it is seen on the English coast; the British
Museum specimen was cast ashore near Ventnor in March 1875. They
occur frequently off the west coast of Ireland, especially on a bank
about a hundred miles west of Clew Bay, Ireland, where on sunny days
in April and May they appear in great numbers, their dorsal fins being
seen at a distance rising several feet out of water as they lie motionless
basking in the sun (F. Buckland’s Natural History of British Fishes,
p. 216). Cuvier says they sometimes attain a length of more than
408 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.
The grampus and sword-fish are not uncommon in the
seas near Sicily, and a herd of either of these may possibly
have given origin to the phenomenon. I agree with my
friend Mr. Bartlett, that the captain and officers of the
‘ Osborne’ deserve the thanks of naturalists and the public
for giving their reports of this marine phenomenon.
When at Peterhead, on the Herring Inquiry, August
28, 1877, I had a long interview with my friend Gray.
Captain Gray has had upwards of thirty years’ experience
in killing whales and seals in the Greenland seas and
Baffin’s Bay. He informs me that a full-grown whalebone
whale (Balena mysticetus) would measure fifty to fifty-
five feet in length. Scoresby, writing in 1830, mentions
a whale fifty-eight feet in length. This was the longest
he killed among 300 individuals. Gray says the appear-
ance in the second figure given by the officer of the
‘Osborne’ closely represents a Greenland whale going
away from the spectator. The whale however has not the
power to bring up his fins as represented; neither are they
of the same shape, or half the size. A whale’s fin re-
sembles a human hand with a mitten on.
e a,
.§
a
ah ;
f
_ :
““
€
*
*
bal ‘sb oh ee i ee ee See "
Prt one u ee 3 \ ie ae oe oe :
om i
eee aoe | ‘THE GREAT SBACSERPENT,
7
cet
se heroine: seen fon ae) . — in July 1875, and
the officers of the Osborne? n June 1877.
havea dozen or more so-called sea-serpents.! Fan
‘rom the above I think we may conclude that, Grate és
ever the sea-serpent may be, it generally appears in the
hot months of the year from June to September, and this
is all that I have to say about the great sea-snake at the
present, wishing from the bottom of my heart that some
one would catch it. I need not say how delighted I should
be to have the job to cast and dissect it, and see how it —
eats. . iat
1 See also Sir Charles Lyell. Second Visit to the United States, vol.
i. p. 131. London, 1849. Gosse, Romance ce Ne! History, vol. 1.
pv. 275. London, 1880. ¥. ;
ra
“¥
- “!
LONDON : PRINTED BY
‘SPOTTISWOODE AND CO,, NEW-STREET SQUARE
AND das amen be STREET
-
a
on”
rae
«=
,
7
“SMITH, ELDER, & C0.'S PUBLICATIONS.
‘THIS VERY DELIGHTFUL BOOK,—PALL MALL GAZETTE.
THIRD EDITION. * With a Portrait. .2 vols. crown 8vo. 18s.
MEMORIES OF OLD FRIENDS: Being Extracts from the Journals _
~ and pee age Fox, of Penjerrick, Cornwall, from 1835 to 1871. To which
are adde ourteen ORIGINAL LETTERS from J. S. MIL, never bef ishec
Edited by HORACE N. PYM. - ii. So ara
' “There are not many things rarer than a thoroughly delightful book, but Mr. Pym must
- have the credit (since the author herself is past receiving it) of having provided readers of
to-day with this rarity. —ATHEN ZUM.
IRISH ESSAYS AND OTHERS. By Marruew Arnotp. Crown
‘ 8vo. 7s. 6d.
CoNTEN''s :—The Incompatibles —An Unregarded Irish Crievance—Kcce, Converti
Gentes—The Future of Liberalism—A Speech at Eton—The French Play in Tondiones
Copyright—Prefaces to Poems.
THE SCIENCE OF ETHICS: an Essay upon Ethical Theory as
modified by the Doctrine of Evolution. By Luestiz SrEpHen, Author of ‘A History
of iatee Thought in the Highteenth Century,’ ‘Hours in a Library,’ &«. Demy
8vo. lés.
UNDER THE SANCTION OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.
THE ‘PEOPLHE’S EDITION’ OF THE
LIFE of HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS the PRINCE CONSORT,
By SIR THEODORE MARTIN, K.C.B. With a Portrait, bound in cloth, 4s. 6d.
*4* The work may also be obtained in Six Parts, each 6d,
LORD MACAULAY, ESSAYIST AND HISTORIAN. By
the Hon. ALBERT 8S. G. CANNING, Author of ‘ The Philosophy of Charles: Dickens,’
‘Religious Strire in British History,’ &ec. Crown 8vo 6s. :
__. NEW AND CHEAPER EDITION OF BRANDRAM’S SHAKESPEARE.
SHAKESPEARE.—_CERTAIN SELECTED PLAYS,
Abridged for the Use of the Young. By SamMugL BRANDRAM, M.A., Oxon. Second
Edition. Large crown 8vo. 6s.
OUTLINES OF NAVAL HYGIENE. By Joun D. Macponatp, ©
M.D., F.R.S., Inspector-General R.N., Professor of Naval Hygiene, Army Medical
School, Netley. Crown 8vo. with Illustrations, 12s. 6d.
*This handy volume supplies a want that has long been cymplained of by naval medical
Officers, and we hope that our remarks will not fail to gain for it an opinion of general,
second to that only of its professional utility, as such knowledge, so clearly and so concisely
put, will, by wise diffusion, acquire strength as it spreads, and so prove highly beneficial to
our navy.’—UNITED SERVICE GAZETTE.
SIX MONTHS IN THE RANKS; or, the Gentleman Private.
Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d.
‘A book like this should be very valuable to army administrators, and to parliamentary
army reformers.’—BRITISH QUARTERLY REVIEW. 7
EXTRACTS FROM THE WRITINGS OF W. M.
THACKERAY. Chiefly Philosophical and Reflective. Second Edition. With a
Portrait. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d.
GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE VOLCANIC
ISLANDS AND PARTS OF SOUTH AMERICA, visited during the voyage of H.M 8.
‘Beagle.’ By CHARLES DARWIN, M.A., F.R.S. A New Edition, with Maps and Illus-
trations. Crown 8vo. 12s. 6d.
LIFE WITH THE HAMRAN ARABS: a Sporting Tour of
some Officers of the Guards in the Soudan during the Winter 1874-75. By ARTHUR
B. R. MYERS, Surgeon, Coldstream Guards. With Photographic Illustrations. Crown
Svo. 12s.
TANTLER’S SISTER AND OTHER UNTRUTHFUL
STORIES. Being a Collection of Pieces Written for Public Reading. By Epwarp F.
TuRNER, Author of ‘T. Leaves.’ Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d.
London: SMITH, ELDER, & CO , 15 Waterloo Place.
vy A
ot ae ee OT
oe a F Sn ae a: na
% aw oe N he 4
W. M. THACKERAY’S WORKS.
eee OO
THE EDITION DE LUXE. Twenty-four Volumes, impose 3
8vo. Containing 248 Steel Engravings, 1,473 Wood Engravings, and 88 Coloured |.
Illustrations: The steel and wood engravings are all printed on real China : ar
paper. The NUMBER of COPIES PRINTED is LIMITED to ONE THOU-
SAND, each copy being numbered. The Work can only be obtained erouey
Booksellers, who will furnish information regarding terms, &c.. 7
»
THE LIBRARY EDITION. With Illustrations by the Author,
RICHARD DOYLE, and FREDERICK WALKER. Twenty-two Volumes, large
crown 8vo. handsomely bound in cloth, price £8. 5s.; or half-russia, marbled
edges, £12. 12s. -
*% The Volumes are sold separately, in cloth, price 7s. 6d. each ; or in
boards, 6s. 6d. each.
THE POPULAR EDITION. 12 vols. crown 8vo. with Frontispiece
to each volume, scarlet cloth, gilt top, price £33; and in half-morocco,
price £5. 5s.
*,%* The Volumes are sold separately, in green cloth, price 5s, each. -
*
NEW AND CHEAPER ILLUSTRATED EDITION. In Twenty-
four Volumes, crown 8vo. price 3s. 6d. each. In Sets of Twenty-four Volumes,
uniformly bound in cloth, price £4. 4s. ; or handsomely bound in half-morocco, .
price £8. Containing nearly all the small Woodcut Illustrations of the former
Editions and many New Illustrations by Eminent Artists.
‘THIS EDITION CONTAINS ALTOGETHER 1,626 ILLUSTRATIONS
By the AUTHOR; LUKE FiupsEs, A.R.A.; Mrs. BUTLER (Miss Elizabeth Thompson) ;
GEORGE DU MAuRIER; RICHARD DoYLE; FREDERICK WALKER, A.R.A.; GEORGE
CRUIKSHANK 3} JOHN LEECH ; FRANK DICKSEE ; LINLEY SAMBOURNE; F, BARNARD ;
E. J. WHEELER; F. A. FRASER ; CHARLES KEENE; R. B. WALLACE ; a P. ATKINSON 3} :
W. J. WEBB; T. R. Macquoip; M. FITZGERALD } W. RALSTON ; JOHN COLLIER ; :
H. FURNISS ; : 'a.G. KILBURNE, &e., &c., &c
BALLADS. By Wituam Makepeace THackeray. With a
Portrait of the Author, and 56 Illustrations by the Author; Mrs, BUTLER
(Miss Elizabeth Thompson); GEORGE DU MAURIER; JOHN COLLIER; H.
FuRNISS; G. G. KILBURNE; M. FiITzGERALD; and J. P. ATKINSON. Printed
on toned paper by Clay, Sons, & Taylor; and elegantly bound in cloth, gilt
edges, by Burn. Small 4to. 16s.
W. M. THACKERAY’S SKETCHES.
THEH ORPHAN OF PIMLIOO, and other Sketches, Frag-
ments, and Drawings. By WILLIAM MAKEPEACE THACKERAY. Copied by
a process that gives a faithful reproduction of the originals. With a Preface
and Editorial Notes by Miss Thackeray. A New Hdition, in a new style of
binding, bevelled boards, gilt edges, royal 4to. price One Guinea.
London: SMITH, ELDER, & CO., 15 Waterloo Place.
pon
SESS
~
<
SASSER
= SR Sate
A
ERS ANE Spe
SSS :
Se SSS
SSA
SS SS SENOS
Se
shard
sane
Saas
woke
5
<
Sy
x
ee
etsy
RS
SO
SS
oak