S << SSS =e S = Pe 2) ee a Pee ——— AY WA WY \ | OTT My ; eka ci 7a : \ i , ‘A Kant um fren a Photograph by Samuel A, Walker, 230, Regent Street, W, NOTES AND JOTTINGS FROM mri MAL Lil & BY THE LATE FRANK BUCKLAND, M.A. H.M. INSPECTOR OF FISHERIES AUTHOR OF ‘CURIOSITIES OF NATURAL HISTORY’ ETC. EYIc. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS $ LONDON SMITH, ELDER, & CO., 15 WATERLOO PLACE 1882 [All righis reserved] ae y * ~ i . 3 “ a : Pe 5 ‘ ~ * ‘ : . - * > f : % ~ * af a ‘ 2. . {i at ak a . 4 be ’ ae - >a - ™ ‘ ws 4 ’ ‘ = as) . “ ~ ~Y 4 a - of * ys a | see , - - e re * jeday t abede| aU Om abe —~ O—— THESE PAPERS were selected and arranged by FRANK BUCKLAND, shortly before his death, with a view to their early publication. The substance of them had appeared in ‘Land and Water,’ whence the illustra- tions (except that of Jemmy the Suricate and the last sketch of the whale) are, by permission, reproduced. Jemmy’s portrait is inserted, by permission, from the ‘Leisure Hour.’ The articles will recall to many the vivid and original. power of observation and illustration, and the earnest love of nature, with whieh their author was gifted. Some papers remain for future publication. G. C. BOMPAS. LONDON: April 1882. CONTENTS. est sid sh Sl PAGE CHRISTMAS DAY WITH MY MONKEYS : ; : ; ] Mr. PONGO, THE GORILLA : : tPA aes ri JOE THE CHIMPANZEE : : : ‘ : . +14 THE RAT, AND JUDY THE MARMOSET : ] Aa) chpeilte Sy | My SURICATE JEMMY THE THIRD, JOE THE TAME HARE, AND MY JACKASS . é , ‘ : ere ed CARLISLE CATTLE MARKET . : ; : : py: AN ELEPHANT IN ALBANY STREET. ; : ey Fea oS, SALMON EGG COLLECTING FOR AUSTRALIA : : ee: SALMON EGG COLLECTING FOR NEW ZEALAND ; ee tee 3 GOO JOHN HUNTER’S CHAIR—EAT AND BE EATEN . ; aro TALKING-FISH, EYES OF MuUMMy, ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU. 91 My TAME OTTERS . : : A : BRS My OTTER TOMMY : ; : : : Pee AE THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND PoOR MAN'S MARKET ‘ ge Lae RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD : ee LED ‘ CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS 2 ; F . 128 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES .. 135 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL’ . = : 2 well NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. : : ; , eas NOTES FROM YARMOUTH . ; : g : 184 Vill CONTENTS. LONDON BIRDCATCHERS SIR WALTER SCOTT’S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD SALE OF MANDERS’ MENAGERIE ; : ' PLAYGROUND FOR THE LIONS AND TIGERS AT THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS TIGER FIGHT AT THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS POLAR BEAR CUBS DESCENT OF THE LION FROM ‘NoRTHUMBERLAND HOUSE LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR, AT THE SOUTHPORT AQUARIUM . THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON THE MANATEE THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT . - a ——- . LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. FIGURE xi 2. 0 DH NH 13. 14. 15. 16. pen Be eS PORTRAIT OF FRANK BUCKLAND : eee Frontispiece JEMMY THE SURICATE ae : . +. To face page 24 ACCIDENT TO A STAG IN WINDSOR PARK Page 291 FORE-LEG OF THE STAG CAUGHT BY FORKED BRANCHES OF A THORN TREE » 293 . SEA-BEAR AT THE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS. oe aUD SEA-LIONS AT THE BRIGHTON AQUARIUM 4 BOG THE WALRUS. One . POSITION OF WHALEBONE WITH. MOUTH OPEN BLO POSITION OF WHALEBONE WITH MOUTH SHUT Ap gs Sve . SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH SHUT Be Bs 4 he SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH OPEN ole WHALEBONE WHALE OF THE GREENLAND SEAS AE . (A) ‘RIDGE OF FINS’ AS SEEN BY THE OFFICERS OF H.M. YACHT ‘OSBORNE’ Ae ate: (B) ANIMAL SEEN THROUGH A TELESCOPE, IN THE OF SWIMMING AWAY ROE SEA-SERPENT AS SEEN IN THE HIGHLAND LOCH IN 1872 : : ee 402 BASKING SHARK WITH FINS PROJECTING ABOVE THE WATER » 406 GREENLAND WHALE SWIMMING AWAY. 410 NOTES AND JOTTINGS FROM ANIMAL LIFE. CHRISTMAS DAY WITH MY MONKEYS. LITTLE Jack began the row ; I know he did, because I saw him do it. But who is Little Jack, and what was the row about ? It was Christmas Day, a very cold Christmas Day, so I made a good fire, and let out the monkeys for a run. My family at that time consisted of four monkeys: Little Jack, Tiny, Carroty Jane, and Jenny. In the ‘ Monkey Room,’ as the servants call my studio, lived also the rat, Judy the marmoset, Joe the tame hare, Jemmy the suricate, the laughing jackass, and the old grey parrot. Little Jack is the fun of the whole cage, and at the same time he is the plague and torment. of the inhabitants thereof. When I bought him I was told he would grow into a big monkey, instead of which he has grown into a little monkey. the most part generals, statesmen, lawyers, &c., and we all admire them for the benefits they have conferred upon human civilisation; but to the sick man writhing in agony from the fierce sting of a cruel and remorseless disease, who is the great man? To whom does he look for human assistance but to the man of science; the student of Nature who has deeply investigated the laws of health and disease, and has arranged and practically applied them to the alleviation of human misery and suffering? John Hunter therefore as the founder of the system of modern surgery, and the discoverer of many of Nature’s sanitary laws, may be justly regarded as one of the greatest benefactors to the human race. The dis- coveries of Hunter were not made in a moment; the conclusions he came to were not arrived at without vast labour of both mind and body. Nature is jealous of her seerets—nay, very jealous ; always a witness to the truth, she gives her evidence only under very severe cross- questioning and cross-examination. In his investigation of disease therefore John Hunter was not unfrequently foiled, and could obtain no answer from the subject before him; it was then his custom to call another witness, and if he could not get at his fact directly, he would indirectly. The human stomach, the great cook- shop of the human system, refused in many instances to inform the enquirer how she prepared the flesh of animals, the leaves of vegetables, and the products of the mineral kingdom, and formed therefrom dishes and entrées which should be palatable to the absorbent and form good blood, invigorating the mental powers and building up anew the body of man, whose construction is, as the Psalmist says, JOHN HUNTER’S CHAIR, 85 so fearful and wonderful. Hunter therefore was in the habit of getting at the secrets of the chef de cuisine by calling at the minor cooking restaurants, asking a question here and a question there. He enquired of the cow why she had a double stomach—a front kitchen and a back kitchen ; of the camel, why he carried a system of watere works whose supply was at command at any moment within his gigantic thistle digester. He asked the horse why he had such a small stomach and such large in- testines; the sheep, why such a large stomach and such small intestines. He saw in the gizzard and crop of the bird a machine which performed not only the duties of digestion, but also of a crusher and mincemeat maker. The entrails of fish (to others an abomination) became to him samples of another mode of Nature’s operations ; and thus he went down and down in the links of created beings till at last the lowest link of all was before him. And of what did that consist? A stomach, a simple stomach—a stomach unprovided with eyes, arms, legs, or brain, but yet—oh! strange to say—having the power which other stomachs higher in the system have not—namely, the power of knowing and choosing what is good or bad for their digestion. In his investigations into the functions of digestion and other functions of the animal kingdom, Hunter collected a vast museum, an assemblage of bottled facts, which no human philosophy can deny, no ideal metaphy- sicians clispute or question. By his will, John Hunter directed this museum to be offered in the first instance to the British Government, and in the year 1799 Parliament voted the sum of 15,0001. 86 JOHN HUNTER’S CHAIR. for the purchase, and an offer being made of the museum to the Corporation of Surgeons, it was accepted on the terms — 3 proposed by the Government. An admirable synopsis of the contents can be obtained of the porter at the college, price sixpence; we learn from this that there were in 1875 40,701 specimens. Great facilities are given by the council of the college to visitors who wish to study. Since Hunter’s death, to the great credit of the nation and its rulers, this magnificent collection has been kept up, added to, and fostered under the care of Mr. Clift, my friend Professor Owen, the late lamented Professor Quekett, and the present able and industrious curator, Professor Flower. From the utmost parts of the world, habited and uninhabited, come monthly and yearly, as if by intuitive instinct, all that is rare curious and in- structive in the animal kingdom, each to add its quota of information towards the elucidation of what Nature does in her private laboratories. Passing into this glorious museum, we ask ourselves upon what order and plan are all these miscellaneous objects arranged. On entering, we find immediately upon our left specimens of the tissues and skeletons of plants, upon our right specimens of dried humanity—mummies from the catacombs of Egypt, from London churchyards, and from the museums of ancient quack doctors. Between these two limits are galleries full to plenitude of all intermediate forms of animal life, some miles of glass preparation bottles, and some acres of dried specimens. Examining these as we walk along, the idea strikes us to ask ourselves what general law governed all these various creatures when in life ?—-why were they created, and why EAT AND BE EATEN. 87 did they live? The answer is simple and easy. The great law of nature, to which all living things must submit, is, ‘Eat and be eaten ;’ and in conformity with this law are all animal machines contrived and made to work. The plant eats decayed vegetable and animal substances; the herbivorous animals eat the plants; the carnivorous eat the herbivorous; man, as lord of all, lays his claim of power upon all and over all. We therefore find that all animals may be well called eating machines. Looking at them as simple machines, we find the ultimate object of their structure is to procure food, and so admirable is this structure that every part of the body is in harmony with its neighbour, so much so that one single bone will tell the comparative anatomist — what the rest of the body must have been like; what its food must have therefore been, and thence what the ex- ternal conditions necessary for its well-being in life; and these rules become of the greatest importance to the researches of the geologist, who by the application of these laws is frequently enabled from a single fossil bone to draw a picture of animal life as it mwst have existed in the times long past when this earth was yet. in its infancy. We place the skull of a deer and of a tiger side by side, and compare them. The teeth are the objects that first strike us as presenting the most marked differences. In the deer we have the front teeth made for nipping grass, boughs of trees, &c., and the hind teeth beautifully constructed for the comminution of the same. Not so in the tiger; here the teeth are mightily different. The great canines grin savagely at us; they are bayonets, 88 EAT AND BE EATEN. daggers, and Hesh-hooks combined ; sharp are their points, cutting their edges. We open the gaping jaws, we find the back teeth set like scissors, so as to bite up crude masses of blood-stained flesh. The deer is an herbivorous animal, the tiger a carnivorous. The teeth of the deer would be useless to the queen of the jungle. The fangs of the tiger placed in the mouth of the deer would cause its death by starvation. We now walk to the cabinet where the skeletons are arranged. We see here the skeleton of the deer made with the utmost lightness consistent with strength; we find that it is constructed for swiftness in flight and bird-like speed. The bones of the tiger are, on the contrary, like bars of iron, solid, massive, firm in their structure. The horn-covered toes are no longer suited for flight, but in the form of claws are elongated into curved, sharp-pointed hooks, not fitted for continuous running, but rather for seizing and holding a living prey. Yet observe the pad at the sole of the foot—how noiselessly, how quietly do these cushions of natural velvet carry the destroyer within reach of the destroyed! How marvellous is the elasticity of this mighty framework of gigantic osseous strength ! We next go to the gallery where various forms of eyes are displayed. What a difference do we behold! The beautiful dark-coloured open eye of the timid deer enables it to see its enemy from afar, and to ramble in midday in search of luxuriant pastures. The eye of the tiger is that of-a nocturnal animal. It has a most wonderful mechanism for making the best use of the scanty rays of light from the moon or from the rising or setting sun. It is fierce, cruel in its aspect. Pity it knows not; once EAT AND BE EATEN. 89 fixed on its prey it is deadly and glaring till its appetite is satisfied with fresh blood. Let us now examine the stomachs of these two animals. That of the deer is formed in a complex manner for the digestion of vegetables. It is a natural hayloft, so formed that there shall be a receptacle, a meal-bag, for containing the collected food when the animal is at pasture. Besides the bag, we find a true digesting stomach, which shall be called into operation when the owner is in safety and able to eat its dinner in peace and quiet. The stomach of the tiger, on the contrary, is a simple bag, a mere receptacle and digester of the flesh it devours. The cook who presides over it is a ‘plain cook,’ serving up ‘simple joints.’ The deer’s stomach has a complicated larder and a grand array of stew-pans, over which a ‘professed cook’ presides, sending up the crude food, not sufficiently comminuted by the teeth, back again into the mouth to receive an extra mincing by the process which is called ‘ chewing the cud.’ Thus then we see that these two animals are broad examples of structure being always in conformity with the food of the animal. The business of the deer is to eat herbs; his whole anatomy is constructed in conformity to this end; his limbs enable him to seek his food, his teeth to procure it, his stomach to digest it. So with the tiger, his teeth are carnivorous, his claws carnivorous, his stomach carnivorous. Throughout the whole series of the animal kingdom we find this law prevailing. Watch a dog, a cat, an elephant, a flea; what seems to be the one idea in these creatures’ heads? To eat, to sleep, and to eat again. 90 . EAT AND BE EATEN. The dog is most friendly to his master, and shows him the greatest attention, when dinner is on the table; the cat is most lively and most complacent when she hears the well-known tread of the cat’s-meat man in the street, and at the words ‘ Méét, méét,’ carries her tail erect and in a true cat-like manner... The elephant is a terrible mendi- cant, always supplicating alms with outstretched trunk. The flea takes his supper of human blood when the sleeper retires for the night, and rouses him again at early morn when his insect stomach craves for breakfast. All these creatures are constructed with the object they have principally in view. The trunk of the elephant tears down the luxuriant vegetation of the jungle; the trunk (or piercer) of the flea sips its food from the skin of the most savoury mortal it can discover in a day’s hopping, be he lord or serf. | Over John Hunter’s grave in the north aisle of West- minster Abbey, close to the stone bearing the inscription ‘O Rare Ben Jonson,’ is the following inscription deeply o> : cut in brass :—‘ The Royal College of Surgeons of Eng- land have placed this tablet over the grave of John — Hunter to record their admiration of his genius as the gifted interpreter of the Divine Power and Wisdom at work in the laws of organic life, and their grateful venera- tion for his services to mankind as the founder of scientific surgery.’ 91 TALKING-FISH, EYES OF MUMMY, ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU. WHEN staying at the Elephant Hotel at Newtown in Wales, in May 1875, Mr. Charles Thomas, of Newtown, was good enough to call upon me in order to show me what he called his ‘talking-fish.’ I candidly confess that his curiosity was entirely new to me. On opening the box which contained this treasure, Mr. Thomas produced a double jug. Each jug is somewhat of the shape of an or- dinary toilet water-bottle; the two jugs are united at the base by a junction very like that which united the Siamese Twins, and the bottles are again united by a kind of handle that passes between them at the top. The top of one of the bottles is plain, the top of the other is rudely fashioned to represent the head of a seal. Mr. Thomas poured water into the bottle which has the open mouth, and gently turned the water in the bottles from side to side; he then stood them on the table, and from the seal’s mouth immediately proceeded a cry amazingly like that of a seal. It sounded something like this: ‘Ma-maar- mamaar-mam-a-ma-a-a-a-r.’ The same effect was produced by emptying the water out and simply blowing into the bottle. I have no idea how this sound is produced, neither 92 EYES OF MUMMY. has Mr. Thomas. Of course there must be some kind of whistle in one of the bottles, but where it is and how it works we cannot tell, nothing being visible from the outside. Seeing I was interested by his talking-fish, Mr. Thomas said he thought he could puzzle me again with another curiosity in the ‘Powis Land Museum,’ at Welshpool. Mr. Thomas was quite right, for he did puzzle me again. He showed me there some very remarkable thimbie-shaped bodies, which would be well represented if the top of one’s little finger were cut off at the root of the nail, and stood on the table. These remarkable objects were, he said, the eyes of mummves, and were found in the shrunken skin of the eyes of dried mummies of the ancient Peruvians at Areca; when the mummies were handled, these ob- jects were found loose in the cavity of the eye. They are conical in shape, with a flattened base; they are of a dark amber colour, and, in fact, very like amber. On holding them up to the sun the light is concentrated as by a lens, so that a brilliant spot, like a speck of flame, appears just where the centre of the eye would come ina human being. When inserted in the mummy these eyes must have a ghastly effect. The section shown naturally at the base presented a laminated appearance, like an onion; and a small portion when burnt showed that they were decidedly formed of some animal matter. The structure was very like that of the crystalline lens of the human eye, which when hardened in alcohol splits into three segments, each of which is again separated into layers, leaving a central nucleus. ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU. 93 Notwithstanding the structure of these dried substances found in the eyes of Peruvian mummies so much re- sembled that of the lens of the human eye, I was inclined to think that they were really the bisected lenses of some fish. By subsequent investigation I ascertained beyond doubt that these curious objects are the lenses from the eyes of cuttle-fish. Collectors of Peruvian antiquities, please examine your collections. 7 Mr. Thomas has resided for upwards of the last twenty- five years in Peru, both in the interior and on the coast. He has travelled: and explored a great deal, and has brought home with him a large collection of prehistoric pottery, which is now in the Powis Land Museum at Welsh- pool. I know nothing about pottery, but I should think © there are some rare treasures in this collection. The shapes of the vases and jugs are most artistic and elegant ; they are made of clay or earthenware, and are very light. Nearly all are in some way connected with animals ; some are in the actual shape of animals; others have figures of animals worked into their substance, such as parrots, mon- keys, lizards, toads, fish, pelicans, &c. Mr. Thomas also showed me a leather-cutting knife (modern, of course). The handle of it is hollow and inlaid with beautiful filigree work. In the hollow are placed little portions of metal, which tinkle as the knife is moved. The object of this is, I am told, that the master may know whether the workman is going on using his knife, or whether he has laid it down in idleness. In Mr. Thomas’s collection are also some very remarkable wooden staves, carved with grotesque figures. They look like staves of Dts ANTIQUITIES FROM PERU, is: islands to the south of Truxillo, on the coast a ie 4 Altogether, Mr. Thomas’s collection is most interesting. a The Powis Land Museum also contains a fine collec- 4 tion of local antiquities and works of art. re “a 7 as, 4 oe 95 MY TAME OTTERS. Mr. Matrutas Dunn, of Mevagissey, Cornwall, informed me, in February 1873, that there were two young otters for sale, which had been caught by fishermen on the Cornish coast, while rowing along the sea-shore in a small boat, going to their crab-grounds. When off a high cliff the men saw two young otters taking their morning bath in a quiet inlet; the otters instantly made for the shore, and quickly hid themselves under a jutting rock. One of the men landed, got hold of them and brought them into the boat, and tied them fast with a strong cord. When these youngsters found their liberty gone, they set up a very shrill noise, whistling would hardly express the name of the sound. The men were about to resume their work, when, more than 150 yards away along the coast, they saw the dam making directly for them, and lay on their oars to notice the effects of the screams of the young on the parent otter, expecting the mother to show the white feather. She swam, however, boldly up to the boat, and tried to climb into it, but its height out of the water prevented her from doing so. Three times the otter made the attempt to mount the sides of the boat, and each time failed. The affectionate and plucky mother was eventually killed, and her two young ones brought ashore. As soon 9G MY TAME OTTERS. as I heard of their capture, I determined to secure the pretty creatures for the Brighton Aquarium. The two poor motherless baby otters arrived at Albany Street about twelve o’clock on a very cold day, the parcels _ delivery man having kindly carried them about London ~ for nearly three hours. They were in a large hamper, with some straw. I found the little things curled up like the « babes in the wood,’ and their pretty little bright eyes looked up at me imploringly, as much as to say, ‘ Please do not hurt us; we are dreadfully frightened, hungry and sleepy, and we have lost our mother.’ Knowing that otters cannot do long without water, I put into their basket a basin of water, and they drank greedily of it. I then sent — for some sprats, and was delighted to find that they would take them out of my hand. Altogether they ate nearly half a pound of sprats between them. Not willing to trust anybody to take my prizes to Brighton, I determined to see them safely thither myself. A four-wheel cab not being available at the moment, I put them in their basket between the doors of a hansom. On arriving at Victoria station, after taking my ticket, I looked at the otters to see how they were getting on. I was horrified to find one lying on his back, apparently dead, while the other looked by mo means so fresh as I could have wished. I had a bit of a shindy with the porter, who wanted to put my basket in the guard’s van. If this had been done both the otters would probably have perished between London and Brighton. I therefore appealed to his humanity, showed him the poor little otters, and asked him where I could find a fire. He then kindly showed me into the waiting- room, and lighted the burners of the gas stove. I put the basket with the otters on the top of the stove, and MY TAME OTTERS. 97 turned up the gas as high as I dared without burning the animals: still the poor sick otter did not move, but the other one got better. I then sent the man to explain the circumstances to the superintendent, and get his leave to take the basket with me into a first-class carriage. Just as the train was starting, a man came by with foot-warmers. I procured one, and placed the otters in their basket upon it. Seeing that the man had another warmer to spare, I took that also into the carriage, and, opening the lid of the basket, carefully slid it down between the two little animals. I then left them alone. When we got to Croydon I examined them again, and was much pleased to find that the healthier of the two was lying full length half asleep on the foot-warmer, while the other one opened his eyes, of which I was glad, for I really had thought he was dead. One ate some sprats, which I carried in my pocket, but the sickly one would not look at them. Feel- ing sure he wanted more warmth still, I considered what I should do for a wrap for him. Having no rug or great- coat, I was for the moment puzzled what to do. After thinking for a minute I recollected I had got on my seal- skin waistcoat, so at once took it off and covered him over with it. Both the poor little animals then went fast asleep, and I determined not to disturb them any more till I arrived at the Aquarium. Mr. Lawler met me at the station at Brighton, and we jumped into the cab without looking at the otters. A few minutes after we left the station I felt some- thing nip my leg, and looking down into the basket, I found that it was empty. Both otters were loose in the cab. My foot-warmers had, in fact, been so effectual that H he MY TAME OTTERS. I had made them too lively. I told Lawler to keep per- fectly quiet and do nothing, and even if he was bitten not to move his legs. The otters soon came out from under the seat and looked impudently at us. I did not care what they did, I was so pleased to find they were alive. When we arrived at the back entrance of the Aquarium I asked for a small landing net, and then passed the cushions of the cab out of the window to the man, who seemed somewhat astonished at my proceedings. I intended to catch them with the landing net; so I shut up the windows, and prepared for an otter-fight in the cab. I had not long to wait before I saw the tail of one of the otters projecting from under the seat. MRecollecting that pictures of otter-hunting sometimes represented the hunts- man as ‘tailing the otter,’ I thought I would try if I could accomplish the feat. So, watching my opportunity, I caught the otter by the tail, gave him a twist, and dropped him into the basket like a shot. He snapped and snarled dreadfully, and tried to turn round to bite me, but I was too quick for him, and the lid of the basket was down in a moment. The other otter then climbed up on to the seat of the cab, and seemed to be looking for his comrade. I opened the lid of the basket, and he seemed inclined to go in. While he was making up his mind, I opened the lid with one hand, and gave him a push with the other, and in he tumbled; so I had got the two all right. When inside the Aquarium I gave them some more sprats and another drink of water. We then shut them up in their basket, and put them by the engine furnace, where I left them as jolly as otters could be, though I regret to say the poor little fellows did not live very long after this. 99 MY OTTER TOMMY. On Friday, April 2, 1875, when returning from a salmon inspection at Cardigan, I halted for a minute to take the temperature of the water of the Teify, as it passes under the bridge at Llechrhyd. A coracle fisher- man came running up to me to ask if I would like to buy an otter. We were much pressed for time, so I had only just a minute to run into the cottage garden and examine him. He was loose in a pigsty, and as handsome a little beast as ever I saw. The fisherman, when lying. in ambush for wild ducks, between Llechrhyd and Cenarth Falls, in January, saw something just at the dawn of day swimming past him in the water; he caught it by the tail, and it turned out to be a little baby-otter. Though a baby, the otter fought and bit tremendously ; but the fisherman firmly secured him by putting him inside the sleeve of his jacket. Hearing the proposed destiny of the otter was to be hunted, I at once bought him, and directed him to be packed up quite warm and sent to Albany Street. During the next day, when all was quiet, I had a grand opportunity of watching him. At first he was very savage, and bit fiercely at everything. I gave him as many fish as he could eat, and he then began to get H 2 100 MY OTTER TOMMY. tame, so tame in fact that he would allow me to stroke his head with a pencil. I then took the otter down to my Fish Museum at South Kensington, and, for want of a better place, was obliged to put him into an aquarium, and I am afraid it did him no good, as the next morning he was found to have suffered much from the cold. Being in want of a cage, I searched for something that would do and was fortunate enough to discover an old wooden pedestal which had been used at the exhibition of 1872 as a stand for a statue: turning it over right on its side, I found it to be hollow, and by nailing wire and boards across the bottom I made a capital big cage. | | When in the aquarium, as it was getting dark, the otter began to whistle in a most beautiful way. At first I thought it was the note of some bird—something like the robin. The whistle was repeated several times sharply, and then followed by a musical kind of rattle. I have no idea of the mechanism of the whistle of the otter; prairie- dogs and marmots also whistle. I believe it is not under- stood how they manage to do it. Lieutenant Juel, commanding officer of a Norwegian man-of-war, who had come to consult me about the fisheries of his country, told me that otter-shooting was a favourite sport in Norway. They either tracked them in the snow, or else called them by imitating the otter’s own whistle. | Tommy, as the otter was christened, lived in his cage along time, and became a great attraction to visitors. He soon learnt to answer to his name, and if a stone were thrown into his tub of water he would dive for and gambol with it in a kitten-like manner. During the MY OTTER TOMMY. 101 summer of 1878 the attendant Edon informed me that Tommy used to come out of his house, especially on moonlight nights, and play about on the roof of his cage ; but, as far as we know, he never then went far away. We should never have known this had not a policeman seen him on the top of his cage. We could not con- ceive how he got out; but it was afterwards discovered that Master Tommy had scratched a hole under- neath the straw of his bed, through which he used to squeeze his india-rubber-like body and crawl up the interspace between the cage and the wall; but at day- light he used to go back again by the same road into his cage. One morning in the following winter a mysterious circumstance took place. The padlock which fastened the wirework of the cage was missing, and Tommy was gone. The question was, whither? As my badger got loose and was seen in the drains in Kensington Gardens (where for aught I know he is still alive and well, and I hope he is so), I expected to hear of a wonder- ful discovery of a live otter in the Serpentine. In order to induce Tommy not to go to the Serpentine, I ordered the lad Joe, the assistant, to put Tommy’s food as usual in his house, so that he might not suffer from hunger. For several days we knew he was not far away, because he ate his food, and we could see his tracks in the snow. One night, as Joe was hunting the bushes about with a lantern, Tommy followed the light, and Joe and the policeman on duty managed to circumvent the foolish little rascal, and drive him into his cage. He was dread- 102 MY OTTER TOMMY. fully thin and scared, and seemed only too glad to get back to his comfortable home. I had previously borrowed © | a cat-trap from Mr. Bartlett, but Tommy was much too artful to go into it. With care and plenty of food the otter soon recovered. Mr. Edon found he could imitate his whistle exactly by sharply twisting the glass stopper of a bottle in its socket. I suppose that my Museum must be a ghostly-looking place in the middle of the night. An Irishman who was put on as policeman, was terribly frightened one night. When going his rounds, as he was flashing his bull’s-eye about, suddenly from the side of the stove there appeared two eyes of fire, glaring with demoniacal fierceness at the Bobby. Poor Bobby trembled, groaned, and quickly retreated backwards from the supposed ghost ; in doing so, he fell down three steps on to his back, which added much to his previous alarm. It turned out that the demoniacal eyes were simply the glass eyes of my big Scotch fox, which Edon had stuffed in a curled-up attitude. The light from the bull’s-eye lantern happened to hit the glass eyes just at the right angle. The stuffed fox was afterwards placed upon the straw on which the cast of the elephant rests. Edon put a chain round his neck, and it is often amusing to hear visitors argue whether the animal is really dead or alive. | In April 1879 my friend Mr. Charles Hambro wrote to say that his keeper had captured an otter near his residence, Milford Abbey, Blandford, Dorset, and that the animal was so little injured that he thought it would do well in captivity. It had been taken by a steel trap, but so ligntly caught that only the extreme end of the toe was MY OTTER TOMMY. 103 held, so that no bones were broken, and no internal parts injured. At my request Mr. Hambro presented this otter to the authorities of the Westminster Aquarium, where it was placed in the tank previously occupied by the manatee, and which was built originally for otters. The manatee had died in March, and the otter was installed in its place. The tank was most admirably suited for the purpose, and being constructed with immense sheets of glass, was really a palace for the animal. This otter did not live very long, so at the request of the Directors I sent up Master Tommy from the Museum, and I am glad I did, as the sight of the otter swimming about in his transparent house is an exhibition quite unique. I have often suggested this exhibition of otters to gentlemen connected with aquaria, but the Westminster Aquarium was the first to carry it out. Not only is this a very pretty sight to ordinary visitors, but the naturalist had, for the first time, an opportunity of learning the habits of this Kee Door, or water-dog,! in hunting for his prey under water. Otter hunters, fishermen, and gamekeepers know doubtless the habits of the otter when on land, but their mode of swimming under water, and their manner of catching fish? in the ' The Welsh for otter is ‘ Ci dwr,’ which signifies water-dog—not at all a bad name. 2 Besides the cannibal fish of the waters, the fish have to run the gauntlet of many animals living a great part of their time, not in the water, but in the air, or breathing air. Thus, for instance, the sea fish have to encounter the attacks of whales, porpoises, dolphins, a great many species of seals, besides gannets, divers, and a great number of other fish-eating sea birds; and here let it be remarked that the walrus does not eat fish: he uses his tusks and wire-like whiskers for routing 104 MY OTTER TOMMY. water are probably as unknown to them as they were to myself until lately. I will now venture to make a few remarks upon the structure and mode of fishing of this interesting British animal, which in elegance of form and perfect structure is one of the most graceful animals that has been placed by the Creator on this earth. When living fish are placed in the aquarium, the otter ascertains the fact in a moment, and his beautiful intelli- gent face gleams as it were with satisfaction as he goes into the water. The first thing to be observed is the wonderful way in which he glides off his board. He does not go in with arun and a jump, but dives head fore- most, almost without disturbing the particles of water, cer- tainly without the slightest splash or noise. This he is enabled to do mainly because his head is formed in a_ beautiful wedge-like shape, a structure -admirably adapted for ihe work he has todo. On each side of the head, near the nostrils, are situated a great array of whiskers. These whiskers are found also in the lion, cat, seal, rat, hare and other creatures which get their living in darkness or else under water. Each whisker springs from a great root. This root is composed of a bunch of nerve-substance, and is connected by means of another nerve with the brain. In the skull of the otter, as in the skull of the lion, we find therefore that the hole through which this great nerve going to the whiskers passes is very large, showing that the nerve is also very in the sand, and turning up therefrom shrimps and small edible arctic molluscs, In tropical climates the fresh-water fish have the crocodile for an enemy. MY OTTER TOMMY. 105 large. The instant the otter is under the surface of the ‘water we see these whiskers come into play; the otter ex- pands them to their full extent, and they form as it were. a circle of sentries, so that when under water these highly sensitive whiskers guide him in all his movements. This is obvious by the way the otter, although not in pursuit of fish, is enabled to turn the corners of the aquarium and avoid obstacles as they occur. The next thing we observe is that, when hunting under water, the otter is guided more by sight than by sense of smell. He keeps his eyes wide open all the time, and turns his head right and left with a quick motion, as though looking for his prey. I am however puzzled to know why it is that the otter’s eyes should be so exceed- ingly small. They are prominent and rat-like, and altogether not very unlike small black boot-buttons. Why the otter should have such small eyes, and the seal such large ones, | am not as yet certain, but there is doubtless good reason for it. When the otter is pursuing a fish, it is most interest- ing to observe his manner of swimming. He does not use his fore and hind legs as does a horse or dog, but folds his front paws alongside his body while he strikes out vehemently with his two hind legs. This causes his movement to be apparently by jerks, but the jerks are so exceedingly rapid that the creature progresses in the water with extreme velocity, almost as quick as a pike when he darts at his prey. I have elsewhere explained that the use of the tail of the rat is to balance himself when passing along places 106 MY OTTER TOMMY. difficult to walk on, and that the use of the beaver’s tail is a not to build his house, as is stated in old natural history books, but to act as a support when the animal is sitting up, tripod fashion, at his work. When swimming the — beaver uses his tail to enable him to rise or sink in the water, whereas I find that the otter carries his tail ex- tended straight behind him, so that he guides himself, and turns very quickly in and out among the sunken roots of waterside trees. This graceful act of turning is well seen in the Westminster otter when he seizes the fish. At that moment he instantly turns, and forms himself as it were into a ball, so that the fish has not the slightest chance of escaping. I have deseribed, when writing of the anatomy of the guillemot, the wonderful bubbles of air that invariably follow that bird when under water, and I have explained how the air is stored underneath the feathers, and given out when the bird is diving. In the otter a somewhat similar phenomenon can be observed. As he swims along under water he is followed by a train of the most lovely air-bubbles,.which appear exactly like beads of quicksilver. The origin of this air I cannot quite make out. A large proportion of it comes directly from the lungs. This is important ; the otter evidently has some difficulty in sinking in the water, he therefore lets out the air to enable him to go down; but at the same time a good deal of air comes from underneath the fur. When the seal dives no air appears to come from underneath his coat. The otter, it has been remarked, always takes the MY OTTER TOMMY. 107 largest fish in the tank first, leaving the smallest fish till the last. He never attempts to eat them under water, but always comes to the bank-side to have his meal. The otter invariably begins to eat the fish by crunching up the head, never the tail; holding his prey by his fore paws, so that it has not the least chance of escape, and munching it into very small bits. I have pre- pared the skull of an otter, and find that the canine teeth are very trenchant, and almost scissor-like in their action ; they are conical in shape, much sharper than the canines of a dog or cat. When a fish is caught the otter immedi- ately transfixes it through the head with his sharp canines, the action of which is such that the fish is held by them as in a rabbit-trap, and cannot escape. The otter holds the fish for some little time between his canines before he begins to eat, waiting till it is quite dead and quiet. In eating he never uses his canines at all, but bites at the fish with the side of the mouth only. The molars and the prz-molars are also very sharp, but capable of crushing any substance into very small bits. In January 1871 my friend Dr. Norman of Yarmouth sent me a huge otter. It was packed in a baby’s cradle in which the various members of the doctor’s family had been successively reared. This grand otter measured four feet three inches from tip of nose to end of tail, the tail being one foot three inches long,and weighed thirty-two anda half pounds immediately after it was captured near the North Pier, Yarmouth. When dissecting the body of the beast, I discovered what I believed to be a new fact as regards the esophagus 108 MY OTTER TOMMY. or gullet of this animal. Holding up the pharynx, I poured — | down thin plaster into the stomach, which, of course, hardened, showing its full capacity ; it was nine and a half inches long, and fifteen inches round, and would hold rather — | over three pints of fluid. The cesophagus was nineteen inches long, and, strange to say, was a very small tube, the size of a half-inch gas pipe, hardly big enough to admit one’s little finger, and only one inch and three-quarters round. I expected to find it a large dilatable tube, as in other fish- eating creatures: why the gullet should be so small I do not know, but the description given above of the teeth, and of the manner in which the otter eats, shows that the structure of the teeth is adapted to this peculiarity in the gullet. If the otter did not cut up his food very small he would be choked. In the seal, on the con- trary, the gullet is a large capacious bag, down which the fish is slipped ina moment. The reader should observe the seals when fed at the Zoological Gardens; the fish are bolted, and not masticated. In my Museum at South Kensington there is a prepa- ration showing this very curious construction of the gullet of the otter. JI have remarked that every time the otter swallows his food he gives a gape, something like yawning. This must have something to do with the large size of the stomach and the sinall size of the cesophagus. I have also in my Museum the cast of an otter when skinned, showing the muscular structure of the beast. I observe that all four feet are webbed; that is to say, a membrane connects the toes as in the foot of a duck; the hind feet are very much larger than the fore feet, a fact a MY OTTER TOMMY. 109 accounted for when we have learned that the otter uses his hind legs and webbed paws much more than his fore paws when going rapidly through the water. The following account of the otter is given in ‘ La Petite Vénerie, written by a most observant French sportsman, M. D’Houdetot: —* This wolf of the river resembles the fox in size, but the badger in conformation. The skin as long as the otter is alive does not become wetted. The paws are very short and webbed; he swims better than he runs. His “spoor” resembles that of the fox, but is larger; and the heel is never marked in the spoor. The otter has yearly two to four young ones, which she lays up in a burrow excavated under the roots in a bank at the water’s edge. The otter eats beetles, cray-fish, insects, frogs and water-rats, but his chief food ! is fish, which he often. kills for the pleasure of killing, as do the marten, weasel and polecat. Otters are taken by traps, or are shot ; but are no longer hunted in France with dogs, as formerly.’ The following account of the old French mode of train- ing otter-hounds is given by M. De la Conterie:—‘ The puppy hounds are allowed to go to an extreme point of hunger: then the whipper-in, who is accustomed to feed them, takes a caldron of soup, and calls them to him. He walks straight into a river or horse-pond and places his 1 As regards the food of otters, my friend Captain Salvin writes me :—‘ Otters will kill and eat rabbits. J keep mine almost always on meat, and often give him rabbit. In the wild state, when frozen out, otters will catch rabbits in their holes. They often kill water-rats, water-hens, &c. My otter is very fond of a fat frog. When it eats eels it puts them constantly into its water dish to help them down. The otter should be called the “‘ water mart,” itis so like the tribe in all its manners and customs.’ 110 MY OTTER TOMMY. soup-dish at such a distance and depth of water that the puppies can get at it without losing foothold of the bottom. Urged by hunger, and by fear of the water, the puppies make many ceremonies before they will go in; but “hunger dares everything.” When the puppies have been in the water once it is all right ; the second time they hesitate an instant; the third time they run to the soup caldron in the water just as though it was on land. All hounds when excited will run precipitately into a river or pond after a hunted stag or fox; but it is another thing to train hounds to take water at daybreak on a cold morn- ing on the chance of finding an otter.’ | All dogs will follow an otter’s track with eagerness ; but his track is not often continuous, as he will constantly pass over from one side of the river to the other. ‘The otter swimming noiselessly in the water fre- ~ quently leaves his retreat without the huntsman seeing him, but rarely escapes the hound’s perception. When the otter comes up to breathe, he shows very little of his body, seldom more than the tip of his nose for a second, which is time’ enough for him to breathe. Fishermen are great enemies of the otter; they catch him in trammel nets, which are set under water. The number of otters | destroyed annually in France is about seven to eight hundred, most of them taken with traps and nets. The Chinese have taught otters to hunt and catch fish ; they are said to keep otters as we do packs of hounds. In former times the otter was much trained in Sweden for catching fish.’ Our author then tells a capital story how, when on a MY OTTER .TOMMY. 111 sporting expedition, he called upon his uncle, a canon of the cathedral town through which he was passing. He told his uncle he would not stop to dine, because he knew it was a fast day, and his uncle would have no dinner. The worthy old clergyman persuaded him to stay. Dinner-time arrived, and upon the table was placed smoking hot what appeared to be a roast hare. ‘ Not hare,’ said the canon, ‘it’s an otter.’ By official authority the otter has been declared maigre, 2.¢., food fit for a fast day. 112 THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN'S MARKET. Tur Londoner who is perchance at a loss to discover something he has never seen before in this great metro- polis should pay a visit to the cattle market at Islington. On Mondays and Thursdays, on those days only, we may observe cattle and sheep being driven through the streets of London. These are the market days at — Islington. The market begins very early, and at ten o’clock the gates are closed, and no cattle are allowed to be driven through the London streets again that day until after six in the evening. Every Friday in the year a very different market is held among the pens at the Islington Cattle Market. This begins at one and lasts up to six exactly, when the great bell announces the time for a general clearance. I feel certain that few of my readers are aware that this most curious phase of civilisation exists amongst us. It is the market for the poor, the moderately poor, the out- of-work people, the very poor, and especially for the London costermongers—quite a class among themselves. — At this market almost every conceivable article used by civilised man can be purchased, at prices ranging from one penny to twenty pounds. The articles sold in this THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET. 113 market are rarely new; they are second-hand—we may almost say third or fourth hand. To this place, in fact, gravitate the shreds and the refuse of Great London and its vicinity—the ‘jetsam and flotsam’ of this huge city. On entering the northern gate (my visit was paid in September) we find the pen which on cattle market days is occupied by the calves devoted to the sale of old, very old clothes. These garments are mostly, if not altogether feminine, and the customers belong to the gentler sex. The sellers are women. There are four of them in the same calves’ pen, one at each corner, each with a bundle of clothes before her. One picks up an article of dress, and sells it by Dutch auction. She starts with two shillings: ‘Child’s jacket for two shillings, fur and all.’ After a great deal of chaff and wrangling as to the worth and condition of the article, she tosses it over the heads of the bystanders to some customer for the large sum of fourpence. In the other corners are selling babies’ half- worn shoes, old caps and bonnets, gowns, jackets, shawls —in fact, the contents of an ordinary rag-shop. If these garments could only speak, what tales of misery and starvation they could tell! It is a curious thing, that if one of these saleswomen, after putting an article once up for sale, puts it down on the ground unsold, she will never pick it up or take money for it that day. In the interspace between the rest of the calves’ pens are allotments of ground for which the holders pay six- pence a day. Laid out on the bare paving-stones may be seen a most curious conglomerate of household goods, all in a broken and dilapidated state. I attempt a catalogue I —a bunch of rusty horse-bits, broken birdeages, chairs without legs, old clocks, chairs without bottoms, rusty nails of all sizes and shapes, lids of saucepans, birds’ eyes, clock weights, bell pulls, glass stoppers for bottles, broken fishing-rods, piles of old boots and shoes one would have thought long past service, buckles, old straps, stirrups, old - saddles, empty physic bottles, bits of broken looking- — i. glasses, oil bottles, odd volumes of books, bits of stair carpet, oil-cloth, &c., &c., besides cough drops, medicines for rheumatism, and patent nostrums of all sorts and descriptions. In order to provide for the commissariat ofthe thousands of people who attend this market are here to be met — | vendors of baked potatoes hot from the can, huge deep-sea oysters fresh from the sea, whelks, mussels, cockles, stale buns, sherbet, ginger beer, sheep’s trotters, ham sand- wiches, cold fried fish and bread for a penny, hot sausage and bread for three halfpence. The articles of food for sale are really fresh and in excellent condition, as these dealers know quite well that neither the poor man nor his wife will buy any food that is not really of excellent quality. | At the end of the avenue we come to the poultry market. Here,on a fine day, can be seen for sale immense quantities of live fowls, ducks, geese, turkeys, pigeons, &c. Some of these birds are of the very best. possible kind—some of the very worst. Trish ducklings can be bought at fourteen or fifteen pence each. They are of course very thin, but yet ‘are bought up by the poor with the idea of fattening them for home consumption. Irish goslings are sold in large THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET, 115 numbers, and fetch from half a crown to three shillings. ‘Widows,’ alias old hens, are to be bought at a shilling each, Most of these widows are sold by the hawker from the hand, as it would be a dangerous experiment to let them try to stand on their feet. They might be- tray their age and infirmities. In the spring of the year these bird dealers have an ingenious device of dressing up the combs of old hens so as to give them the appear- ance of birds in full lay. Adjoining the poultry market are offered for sale a number of German hen canaries. At this time of the year large crates containing small cages of German canaries come to this country. These birds are all hens. In the market they are, of course, warranted all cock birds. They fetch, cage and all, from one to two shillings each. The German dealers do not send over the cock canaries until they are clean-moulted and in song. These birds are not sold in the streets, but in shops, where they fetch from 4s. 6d. to 6s. each. They begin to appear in London in the month of November. Alongside the poultry are also cages containing other hirds and a few ‘monk’ parrots. ‘ Monk’ parrots are sickly parrots, which have caught cold on their passage from abroad to the wholesale dealers in Liverpool, London, &c. Grey monk parrots were being sold at five to six shillings. Had they been healthy birds, each would have been worth a pound. Near the canary stalls the market is occupied by rows of costermongers’ barrows, new and second-hand, all for sale. There are also carriage and truck wheels and springs in abundance; in some cases there are only 12 116 THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET, portions of wheels. The spokes of wheels are much used for the rounds of ladders, and are well fitted for the purpose. There are also numbers of carts containing live pigs ; these are sold by higglers or pig jobbers, who go round the country collecting them. The pig market can always be found by the noise the pigs incessantly make. The eastern side of the marketis devoted to old carriages ° and harness. Here may be seen old hansoms, broken-down four-wheelers, carts and vans of every age, shape and de- scription. I was much struck with the collection of the metal portions of what once had been first-class harness, especially the coronets, intricate monograms, coats of arms, and other heraldic devices, which had been taken off old harness that had seen better days. These metal armorial bearings were polished up equal to new, and, really looked beautiful. Near this carriage department we came upon a lively: scene, namely, the horse market. In this were to be found goats young and old, but the poor things were in very bad condition. Some Nannies are sold as milkers, and a most ingenious device is used by the dealers to give . old goats the appearance of being in full milk. A very young, innocent-looking kid of another goat plays a pro- minent but not willing part in this transaction. Almost every description of goat is to be found here. The large male goats are bought for stables where many horses are kept. I believe the reason of this is that goats will run from fire, and the horses will follow them out of the stable should it catch fire. Goats are sometimes used as food, and in some cases sold for venison. % - 2 re ee eS THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET, 117 Jerusalems, alias living donkeys, are plentiful in the market. In September mokes, as they are called, are at a discount owing to many circumstances: to wit, the winter is coming on, the lively time of year is nearly over, and there is no more demand for mokes to assist at the sea-side, children riding, school treats, excursions, bean feasts, &e. In the spring of the year, on the contrary, good donkeys, also small ponies, fetch high prices from the gipsies. The gipsies frequent places such as Epping Forest, Hampton Court and the suburbs of London resorted to by school treats, &., and make a great deal of money by providing donkey rides. Good working donkeys are in the spring worth 3/. to 4. each. In the autumn a good donkey can be got for from 1/. to 50s. Donkeys are largely used during the busy fruit season by the coster- mongers. But many of them cannot afford to keep a donkey during the winter, so that in October donkeys are very cheap. In horses a large business is done. Those principally sold are screws, such as kickers, jibbers, roarers, broken- winded, bolters, and vicious tempers. Every infirmity to which horseflesh is liable may be here found repre- sented. Among the horses are some fine specimens of ‘racks,’ that is fleshless horses, simply skin and bone. They are principally bought up by the knackers, not for the flesh, but for what they really are, for the skin and bone. Every portion of a rack not sold for cat’s- meat is of some value to the knacker. The ultimate destination of the horses for sale, not racks, is for the carts of costermongers and little tradesmen. The opera- tions in horse dealing are principally done by horse copers 118 THE COSTERMONGERS’ AND POOR MAN’S MARKET. before sending the animals into the market, and, caveat emptor! Old horses are apparently turned into young -oves by judicious trimming, grooming, and feeding up according to their ailments and infirmities. When tied up for sale the horses are certainly not kindly used, being kept awake and lively by sticks or whips. Adjoining the market there are sales which take place weekly of Russian and other foreign ponies. They are sold by auction in large numbers. These ponies are strong serviceable animals, and are received here without shoes on their hind feet. This is to prevent them frem kicking and injuring each other when in the hold of the steamer that brings them over. These horses and ponies are bought up by speculators in numbers varying from forty to fifty, and are taken round to country fairs. They fetch from seven to twelve guineas each. Altogether the Islington market on a Friday is a most curious and interesting sight. Take a tram from the top of Tottenham Court Road to the ‘Brecknock Arms;’ you will be within two minutes’ walk of the market. The best time to go is on a Friday when the weather is fine; the height of the market is about four o’clock. 119 RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, 7 OXFORD. I HAVE taken an opportunity lately of inspecting the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford. This museum was one of the first, if not the very first, ever instituted in England. The Ashmolean Museum was founded by Elias Ashmole, in 1679. Ashmole’s monument is at Lambeth, with the following inscription :—‘ Hic jacet inclytus ille et eruditissimus Elias Ashmole, ob: 18 Maii, 1692 Anno: etat. 76. Sed durante Museo Ashmoliano Oxon: nun- quam moriturus.’! The collection was, however, commenced by John Tradescant, who visited England first in 1600 ; it was then called ‘ Tradescant’s Ark.’ For many years it was under the curatorship of my father’s old friends, Philip Bury Duncan, D.C.L., Fellow of New College, Oxford, and John Shute Duncan, D.C.L. The following are some of the more remarkable relics in this interesting collection :— Model of ancient British village, discovered at Standlake, near Oxford. It appears that our ancestors lived in circular holes in the ground, five feet across by three or four feet deep. Huts or tents were probably erected over these holes; they must have been very warm and comfortable. I shall try a house of this kind myself. Soldiers on a campaign should take the hint. 1 Lysons’ Hnvirons of London, p. 330. 120 RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD. The Alfred jewel found in Newton Park, Somersetshire, with the inscription in Saxon, ‘Alfred commanded me to be made.’ Alfred diedin 901. The jewel is therefore nearly 1,000 years old. I have described this elsewhere.! A lock of hair of King Edward the Fourth, taken from his head when his remains were examined in the chapei of Windsor Castle, March, 1789. This is a very small lock, and the colour of the hair is quite faded. This specimen shows what a long time human hair will resist decay. Edward the Fourth died 1483, nearly 400 years ago. A portrait of the head of King Charles the First (who died 1649), taken immediately after the coffin was opened in the vaults of Windsor Chapel, 1813: near it is the printed descrip- tion of what occurred on this occasion, written by Sir H. Halford. The hat worn by President Bradshaw when he condemned King Charles the First. It is made of thick leather, and has a brim three inches wide. The cavity for the head is thirty-five inches round, and inside the leather is an iron cage, a round iron plate protecting the top of the head; slips of iron protect the sides. Helmet and cuirass worn by the Pikemen in the days of King Charles the First. A shoe of the Hermit of Dynton ; who was clerk to Simon Mayne, one of King Charles the First’s judges. The hermit died at Dynton, 1660. This shoe is made entirely of patches of leather nailed together. A picture shows that his dress was made of the same material, and in the same way. A pair of bellows which belonged to King Charles the Second, beautifully inlaid. Boots of Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester. Candle snuffers used in the sixteenth century. A pewter plate from off which King Charles the Second dined the day before the battle of Worcester. King Henry the Highth’s hawking glove, a thick glove of the same sort of leather as is used now by hedgecutters. It 1 Logbook of a Fisherman and Zoologist, page 372. RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD. 121 must have been made to fit a man with a large hand; the wrist part is highly ornamented. A. sword presented by Pope Leo X. to King Henry the Eighth, when he first assumed the title of Midet Defensor, or Defender of the Faith. The hilt in crystal is set in silver. A portion of an old stump, apparently uninteresting, but to all Oxonians the most interesting object in the collection. It is a portion of the stake used when Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley were burnt outside the Bocardo Gate at Oxford, at the place now marked by a stone cross let into the street opposite Balliol College. The lower end of the stake is pointed, the upper end charred and burnt. This curiosity deserves a special case to itself. These poor martyrs, who were called the ‘ Noble Three,’ were burnt a.p. 1555. A marvellous picture of the battle of Pavia, 1525. The soldiers are all in very heavy armour. The artillery of the period is most interesting. Queen EHlizabeth’s watch and chain. The watch-case is highly ornamented with turquoise stones; externally it appears to be made entirely of turquoise. Queen Elizabeth’s riding-boots. These are made cf a soft flexible leather resembling thick chamois leather. The sole is thick and strongly made; it is nine inches long. The Queen wore high heels, they are two inches high. The boots measure fifteen inches from the heel to the top; Queen Elizabeth must have had a very pretty foot. These boots lace up on the outside. The ladies’ high-heeled walking-boots which extend high up over the ankle, must have been ‘developed by the process of selection’ from Queen Elizabeth’s boots. Inside the Queen’s boots I discovered a small portion of satin, once white and forming the lining; it is now coffee-coloured with age. These boots must be about 300 years old. Lady’s shoe, time of Queen Anne. It is the very model of ladies’ shoes now to be seen in the ladies’ boot-shops in London. It is high-heeled, and measures eight inches long, by two and a quarter wide at the sole. 122 RELICS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM, OXFORD. A still smaller sandal shoe of black satin. This belonged to the late Duchess of York. The sole of this lovely little shoe is eight inches and a quarter long, and one inch and a half wide, a regular Cinderella's shoe. Where is the lady now whom it would fit ? Small picture of the ‘ Via Dolorosa,’ or road to Calvary, formerly supposed to have been made of humming-birds’ feathers, now pronounced by the best authorities to be made of trans- parent enamel. This is said to be the finest specimen of the kind known, and the art is supposed to have been lost. This most valuable specimen belonged to the queen of James II. Very fine old painting (1651) of the now extinct bird the dodo. The head and foot of the dodo are in the university museum. A big frog, beautifully painted, is by the side of the dodo. : A collection of native arms from Fiji and the South Seas. Amongst these, without doubt, are those collected by Captain Cook in his second voyage, many uf which are figured in his ‘ Voyages.’ Three specimens of man-traps—most formidable-looking things. I have a man-trap in my own Museum at South Ken- sington. A spring gun on pivot, used formerly for poachers. Itisso contrived that it will only fire direct at the poacher. The lock is admirably protected from wet, by wood. Spring guns were made illegal about 1826. An ancient basket-hilted sword, a large portion of which is completely enveloped and grown over by the root of an old tree. How [I should like to know the history this sword might tell! | CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. AmonG the many curiosities of natural history of which i am always in pursuit, nothing gives me more pleasure than the discovery of an ancient Charter Horn. When at Ripon in October 1863, I took the opportunity of inspecting the celebrated relic of antiquity, the Ripon horn. I went to call on the Horn-blower, and found him living in a little house down a court, not far from the Unicorn Hotel. He had been horn-blower for thirty-three years, and his father was horn-blower before him for thirty years. He always walks bearing his horn in front of the mayor when the mayor and corporation attend church. The horn is a common cow’s horn (with a metal mouthpiece), curved in shape, measuring three feet six inches long. It is carried by means of a leathern strap across the bend of it. At nine o'clock every night the Ripon horn-blower goes with his horn to the door of the mayor and blows three long blasts—rather a dismal but yet musical sound. He also gives one blast at the Market, Cross. In former times the mayor was called ‘ the Wakeman,’ and the blowing of the horn, I believe, indicates two things: first of all it answers the purpose of a ‘curfew’ bell, and at its sounding in former times people were obliged to put out their fires, 124 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. a wise precaution, considering the carpets were rushes, and the houses were built of wood. It also indicates the watch-setting, and the law in Saxon times was something to this effect :—If anybody after horn-blowing or watch- setting was robbed ‘on the gate-syd within the towne,’ the wakeman was bound to compensate the person robbed if it was proved that he ‘and his servants did not their duties at y‘ time.’ 7 The horn in the blower’s possession is not the original horn. This is kept at the house of the mayor. I called upon the mayor and asked him to allow me to examine it. This ancient horn is handsomely mounted, and fastened on to a black velvet scarf made to be worn on the shoulders. At the junction of the scarf with the horn are miniature silver models of a spur and cross-bow. On the horn is this inscription :—‘ Antiquis et honorem et premia possi—(I cannot quite construe this)— Vetustate lapsum restituit.— J. Aiselbie, ARM., 1703.’ On the lower part—‘ This horn was again restored, 1854.—H. Morton, Mayor.’ Attached to the velvet scarf are several silver plates. Every mayor on resigning office adds, or is supposed to add, a silver plate. I made a note of some of the dates as follow— 1570, 1593, 1595, 1602, 1658. Some of the plates, bearing coats of arms and bosses, are shaped like a sailor’s hat. Several also are of curious antique shapes. I was informed that the oldest badges are those of a ‘wakeman’ who lived in the time of Henry VIII., the name of one Gayscar, wakeman in 1520, being marked especially. The title of Wakeman was exchanged for that of Mayor in 1604. Hugh Ripley was the last wakeman, and the first mayor. aM “4 ori 4 oo . ) a A, i CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 125 I was told that the horn itself is certainly of a date not later than the Conquest ; that its form is true Saxon, and that there was another horn of similar shape made of ivory preserved in the vestry of York Cathedral. In former times Ripon was famous for the manufac- ture of spurs. Ben Jonson says, ‘ As true as Ripon rowels.’ ‘There is an angel if my spurs be not right Ripon.’ ‘Whip me with wire beaded with rowels of sharp Ripon spurs.’ I was fortunately able to examine a specimen of a real Ripon spur. The rowel was so ingeniously placed that the sharp points of the star of which it was composed would not show themselves unless pressed against some- thing. This effect was produced by a most ingenious guard. I recommend our London spurmakers to look into the matter, as the revival of Ripon spurs would probably be acceptable to equestrians. Ripon was also celebrated for some centuries for making saddletrees and crossbows. When passing through York I took the opportunity of examining the horn there. Not having time to go the regular rounds of the cathedral, one of the vergers conducted me at once into the ancient vestry, and un- locking an old oak chest, displayed this valuable relic to my admiring eyes. It is made of the lower end of a very large tusk of an elephant, and is of the same peculiar semi-curved shape as the Ripon horn, which, however, is not of ivory, but of simple cow-horn. I am not quite sure whether the hollow of the horn is the natural cavity of the tusk, or has been scooped out by artificial means. It is of a dark mahogany colour, 126 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. reminding me forcibly. of the tusks of the mammoth found frozen in the ice in Siberia, and its surface is polished like a marble monument; this is caused, I imagine, by _ the touch of human hands for many generations past. The most authentic history of this remarkable horn is given by Sir William Dugdale as follows :—‘ Ulphus the son of Thorald, who ruled in the west of Deira, by reason of the difference which was likely to rise between his sons about the sharing of his lands and lordships after his death, resolved to make them all alike; and thereupon coming to York with that horn wherewith he used to drink, filled it with wine, and by the ceremony enfeofted this church with all his lands and revenues.’ By this relic, I understood the Chapter still retains possessions of great value. In former times the horn was adorned with gold mountings, and slung with a gold chain; but it wes stolen from the church in a general seizure of ecclesiastical property. Afterwards Thomas Lord Fairfax became its possessor, the golden ornaments having been stripped from it. He bequeathed it to his son Henry Lord Fairfax, who restored it to the church. In 1675 the Deanand Chapter re-adorned it with silver-gilt, and engraved upon it an in- scription commemorative of the circumstances. The horn is adorned with four rings, or straps of silver, and on that which protects the rim are representations of various animals, all being emblematical: thus, the griffin signifies honour; the unicorn, chastity; the lion, courage ; the doe, affection ; the dog, faithfulness. I find that ‘Deira’ was one of the two kingdoms—the name of the other was Bernicia—out of which Northumbria was formed in the early part of the Saxon government. ‘The capital of the CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 127 kingdom of Deira was York. The horn, therefore, will date somewhere between A.D. 560 and 600. ‘There is, I believe, no reason to doubt the authenticity of this ancient Saxon horn, though from whence, and by what means, the Saxons obtained so fine a bit of ivory I cannot conceive. After some research I have obtained further particulars relative to ancient horns. In the ‘ Archeological Journal,’ vol. ii., there is an interesting article upon the usages of domestic life in the Middle Ages, in which I find the following :—‘ The warriors of the North drank from horns, as did the Homeric heroes, ages before them, and as the people of most countries have done where horn-bearing animals were known. In the ninth century the Saxon King of Mercia gave the monks of Croyland his “ table horn, that the elders of the monastery might drink out of it on feast days, and sometimes remember in their prayer the soul of Wiglof, the donor.” The same Wiglof gave to the refectory of Croyland his gilt cup, embossed on the exterior with barbarous victors fighting dragons, which he was wont to call his crucible, because a cross was impressed on the bottom and on the four angles of it. This was doubtless a specimen of that skill in working precious metals for which the Anglo-Saxons were famous, and for the exercise of which Eadrid, in 949, rewarded his gold- smith Alssige with a grant of land. Horns continued to be appendages of the table until after the Conquest, although other drinking vessels were in use also. We see them represented in the Bayeux tapestry, and find from wills and other notices that they lingered on the board or in the hall for centuries after the date of that historic needlework. The mouth of the horn was not unfrequently 128 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. fitted with a cover like the old-fashioned Scotch muil. In the collection of antiquities in the British Museum is preserved a very large drinking-horn of the sixteenth century; so great, indeed, that it was evidently intended to try a man’s capacity for wine. It is formed of the small tusk of an elephant, carved with rude figures of elephants, unicorns, lions, and crocodiles, and mounted with silver; a small tube, ending in a silver cup, issues from the jaws of a pike, whose head and shoulders enclose the mouth of the vessel. The following legend is engraved upon it :— Drinke you this, and think no scorne, Although the cup be much like a horne. The remains of an iron chain are attached to this horn, which was probably suspended in the hall of some convivial squire of the olden time, whose guests were at times sum- moned to drain it, or to pay a shilling fine. This custom of drinking from horns is by no means yet obsolete, for when a student at the German University of Giessen, I myself frequently became a victim to the fashion of drinking, or rather trying to drink off an immense curved cow-horn which had been filled with Bavarian beer, a most difficult task, for if the horn is not held in a peculiar manner, and gradually elevated by an experienced hand, the beer invariably rushes down the incline of the horn with considerable violence into the face of ‘ the fox,’ as the new student is called. In the Museum at Canterbury there is an excellent specimen of an ancient curfew, and also of a curfew bell. The curfew, or ‘cover fire,’ which was used long ago to Bes - ‘* 4 rv, " CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 129 put out the hearth-fires when the curfew bell rang, is a large curved piece of metal, something like the front half of a Life Guardsman’s cuirass enlarged. ‘And what may this be ?’ I inquired, as I kicked my foot against a piece of metal under one of the cases. ‘ Oh, that’s a curiew bell,’ was the answer. Lucky curfew bell to have escaped the marine store dealers these many hundred years, even though you have lost your clapper ; yet unhappy curfew bell to be so little prized by the present inhabitants of Canterbury! Surely such precious local antiquities as the curfew and curfew bell are worthy of tender care, and a good place in the cases. A new clapper, too, should be fixed to the poor old bell, and thus he might once again lift up his voice in the streets of Canterbury, to be heard by the subjects of Queen Victoria, after being silent for centuries, and possibly having given out his last-sung notes (quere, what are they?) to the subjects of King Henry I. When at Carlisle, after the Salmon Disease Inquiry, I had just half an hour to spare. I had previously read in the guide-book that in the Chapter-house at Carlisle there was a very ancient Charter Horn. Canon Prescott on my application kindly showed it to me, telling me that the object in question was called the Horns of the Altar. What was my astonishment, on examining this specimen, to find it to be a walrus skull without a lower jaw, with tusks about eighteen inches long! The skull itself was marked out with faded colours, so as somewhat to resem- ble a human skull. I afterwards obtained the following information about this curious Charter Horn. K 120 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. In the year 1290 (as appears by the Pleas of Parlia-+ ment) a claim was made by the King, Edward I., and by others, to the tithes on certain lands lately brought under cultivation in the Forest of Inglewood. The Prior of Carlisle appeared on behalf of his convent, and urged their right to the property on the ground that the tithes had been granted to them by a former king, who had then enfeoffed them by a certain ivory horn (quoddam corny eburneum), which he gave to the Church of nis and which they possessed at that time. : In 1530 Thomas Tonge, Norroy King of Meet made an heraldic visitation of the north of England, in which he recorded as follows: ‘Be it noted that the Monastery of Carlisle was first founded by King Henry I., the second year of his reign. And the said King Henry gave unto the said monastery a great horn of venery, having certain bonds of silver and gold, and the verses following engraven upon it: Henricus primus noster fundator opimus, dedit in teste cartam pro jure foreste. And by the said horn he gave liberty within the Forest of Inglewood.’ The Cathedral of Carlisle has had these two fine walrus tusks, with a portion of the skull, in its possession for a great number of years. They appear in ancient inventories of goods of the cathedral (1674), together with other articles of the altar furniture, as ‘one horn of the altar in two parts,’ or ‘two horns of the altar.’ So antiquaries came to the conclusion that these were identical with the’ ‘ivory horn’ referred to above. Communications were made to the Society of Antiquaries (see * Archzeologia,’ vol. iii.), and they were called the ‘Carlisle Charter Horns.’ Bishop Lyttleton, in a paper read before the society in 1768, said the ‘horns’ were so called im- CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 131 ri properly, being ‘certainly the teeth of some very large sea fish. He quoted this passage from Ray’s ‘ Itinerary : ’ ‘They have preserved [at Carlisle] two elephant’s teeth fastened in a bone like a scalp, which they call the Horns of the altar.’ The late Professor Harkness, F.R.S., in a paper com-~ municated to the Cumberland and Westmoreland Anti- quarian and Archzological Society in 1875, thus described the tusks and disputed their title to be called Charter Horns : 7 ‘The so-called horns consist of two walrus tusks clamped by an iron bolt to the maxillary bones of a walrus; the inter-maxillary bone and the nostril-bones are gone 7 toto; the tusks are misplaced—that is, the right tusk is in the left. socket, and vice versa, so that the grooves characteristic of walrus tusks are to the outside, instead of inside as in the living animal. The tusks are broken at the upper end, one very much so, and these fractures are more modern, judging from their colour, than the fractures which have taken place at the tips. Holes exist in the upper parts of the tusks in which have been copper nails, as shown by the green tinge. Tron nails and nail-holes exist in the bone, and iron rust shows that it has had an iron rim round its back which is sawn off smooth, and in such a plane that the horns hang against the surface of a wall, tusks down, as in the living animal. In the front part of the bone there seems to have been a metal plate, probably of silver, which may have held the donor’s name. The iron bolt which now holds the horns together is much later in date than the iron nails in the bone.’ K 2 132 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. ‘I have no doubt the tusks and bones have been subjected to very rough usage after they came into the Cathedral. When first presented there is every reason for inferring that the sockets of the tusks would be | perfect, or very nearly so. An accident could never have broken and destroyed them in the manner they now appear. The sockets, when perfect, would retain their tusks, or if they came out, a small portion of glue would have fixed them permanently. The mode in which they have been both broken suggests the idea that the tusks were held near the points and wrenched violently out- wards. This would destroy the outer sides of the sockets.’ ‘We may safely conclude that these “ horns” are not Charter Horns at all, but that they were given to the Cathedral at Carlisle by some traveller, at a time when such things were considered valuable curiosities, probably tempore Henry VIII., and that they were used for the decoration of the altar, being hung from a nail in the wall behind. Further, we may conclude that they have been violently pulled to bits, probably by the Puritans, and rudely patched up again by the iron bolt which now holds them together, and which may have been concealed by embroidery tacked on by the irregularly placed copper nails.’ I cannot quite understand how a walrus’s skull and teeth came to be considered so valuable as to be promoted to the dignity of a Charter Horn of a great cathedral like Carlisle. Iam afraid Bishop Lyttleton was not a naturalist, or he would never have called the tusks of a walrus the teeth of some very large fish. It seems not improbable that they were presented to CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. 133 the Church as an offering by some traveller, and used as an ornament to thealtar. Such offerings were frequent, both at the smaller altars of cathedrals and in churches. Another Charter Horn, the Pusey Horn, is preserved at Pusey House, near Faringdon. This horn isan ox horn, two feet and half an inch in length, and a foot in circum- ference at the larger end, and dark brown in colour. It is mounted round the middle with a ring of silver-gilt, and supported on two hound’s feet. At the small end isa hound’s head of silver-gilt, made to screw in as a stopper. Thus without the stopper it served as a hunting-horn, and with it as a drinking-horn. On the silver ring is the following inscription :— £ Lyng Buowde qeobe CU pllam Pecote bys Horne to holve by by lond. The traditional history of the Pusey Horn is that Canute being encamped in the neighbourhood of Pusey, and the Saxons at a few miles distance, an officer of his army, the ancestor of the Pusey family, discovered an ambuscade formed by the Saxons to intercept the King. He gave information to Canute, who, in consequence, escaped the danger, and for this service gave to the officer and his heirs the manor of Pusey, to hold by the tenure of this horn. Another Charter Horn, the Borstal Horn, was granted by Edward the Confessor to Nigel, his huntsman, by whose descendants it is still preserved. Nigel having slain a wild boar which infested the forest of Bernwood, near the King’s palace at Brill, Bucks, received a grant of land with the custody of the forest of Bernwood, to hold to him and his heirs ‘per unum cornu quod est charta 134 CURFEW AND CHARTER HORNS. preedictze foreste.’ Upon this land Nigel built a lodge called Borestall, in memory of the slain boar. The Borstal Horn, or Nigel’s Horn, as it is also called, is the horn of some kind of ox or buffalo, and is of a dark brown colour. It is two feet four inches long on the convex bend, and twenty-three inches on the concave, and three inches in diameter at the large end. It is tipped at each end with silver-gilt, and fitted with wreaths of leather to hang about the neck, ornamented with an old brass seal ring, a brass plate sculptured with a horn, and several lesser plates of silver-gilt with fleur-de-lys. Figures of the Carlisle, Pusey, and Borstal Horns are given in the ‘ Archeologia,’ vol. iii. © 135 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES. A NEW THEORY OF CREATION. SOLOMON has said there is nothing new under the sun. Until March 11, 1876, I had always believed Solomon was right, but I have now really something new to relate. It is a new theory of creation—very startling, I admit, at the same time very amusing. An elderly man called upon me and stated he had a box of fossils he wished to show me. He is the coachman of a clergyman at whose house I once stayed when out on inspection duty. He said he was ‘no scholar, but he was an observer of nature.’ The coachman’s theory is this :—- According to his idea, there were three periods of time in the earth’s history—viz., lst, thousands of years before Adam ; 2nd, thousands of years before Noah; and 3rd, our own time. In the thousands of years before Adam the world was peopled with ‘ giants and little men ;’ and he had in his box a great many of these little men turned into fossils, showing their customs and habits. He had brought specimens of the little men for me to examine. He did not know what had become of the giants. He then took out of his box a fossil little man, a little woman, anda baby. The little man is about four inches 136 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, high, like ‘Hoddy Toddy, all head and no body;’ the little woman is shorter, but much fatter; the baby is about as big as a large bean. The coachman is sure his theory is right, because he has picked up a leg (rather gouty) and a pair of feet, about as big as beans, in the same field ; so that they must have belonged to this tribe of pre-Adamite little people. He does not know exactly what the habits of this small people were, but he thinks ‘they buried themselves in the earth; they lived like wild animals, and came out of their holes and caves and fed in the fields like rabbits; they hadn’t much intellect ; nobody had intellect before Adam, who had the breath of life blowed into him.’ ‘Types of these little pre-Adamite people now remain in our own time. They are existent in every village, in the form of silly people who runs about and knows nothing.’ The little people ‘lived upon the fruits of the earth before they knew how to till the ground.’ To prove his theory, he brought some of the pre-Adamite fruits upon which the little people lived. Thus there was a tomato. On,one side the tomato had been exposed to the sun, on another it had been covered from the sun with leaves. Then there were some fossil walnuts. One had been cracked and showed the contents inside. Then there was a ‘dough-fig,’ showing the stem quite plainly; an orange which had been peeled ; a ‘ sturshum’ (nasturtium) seed ; a fruit that had tumbled into the mud, and there were marks where the little people had been trying to scratch it out. There were also a mushroom and half an ego, showing the shell, the white, and the yolk. Along with the little men there lived a number of BI i 4 BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES. 13% very curious animals; thus there were a fossil bat, a fossil mole, and other animals he could not make out. Besides the animals, all very little, there were a great number of birds and fishes of different kinds. The best speci- men of a bird was a fossil partridge, about an inch and a half long, and the size of a large filbert; he called my attention to the frightened look of the bird. A fossil pheasant did not look so frightened. There is a fossil goose that looks particularly alarmed; in fact, so frightened that he has dislocated his neck. There are no bones in these fossil birds, ‘ they are all pressed together.’ These birds still preserve the frightened look caused by ‘the sudden destruction of period that come on ’em. They lived on the hills with the little men, and when they saw the waters of the deluge a-coming up they couldn’t get away in time, and they looked with surprise at the water.’ The frightened appearance of these birds still remainlng on them isa certain proof of the deluge. Somehow or other, most of the birds are very much crushed, but he ‘don’t know what crushed ’em. Their feathers ’as all gone away through the lapse of hages.’ He had also a collection of fossil fish that lived at the time of the little men; thus there is a sprat, a minnow, an eel, a gurnet, a smelt and a mackerel, all diminutive, the same as the people. The eel is particularly remarkable; ‘he was going quietly along through the water, when he was took with a sudden change of period, and became solid all of an instant.’ The great triumph of the theory is ‘a fossil bird’s nest, there is even ‘a mark where the bird leaned his head over,’ and he has found a bird, he thinks, that built the nest. There are not many insects, only one ‘138 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, fossil black-beetle. ‘ As the black-beetle lived in theperiod so many hundreds of thousands of years before Adam, he has now turned into a beetle, white with age.’ My readers will doubtless wonder what all this means. The coachman has been over twenty years in the employ — of his master, with whom he goes out shooting a great deal. At these times he has made his collection of pre- Adamite little men, fruit, birds, beasts, and insects that were living thousands of years before Adam. These wonderful curiosities are really nothing but common flints. His little men, legs, birds and fishes are simply fossil sponges, or portions of flint, which, by an imaginative mind, may be said somewhat to resemble the various forms attributed to them. His ‘fruits of the earth’ are fossil echini; his fossil bird’s nest is simply a flint waterworn sponge, somewhat resembling a small bird’s nest. , He was, however, right in two cases, as he produced some fossil ‘ sherk’s ’ (shark’s) teeth, and the fossil ear-bone of a whale. I thought it would be too cruel to tell the coachman that his curiosities were only flints, and he went away quite satisfied with the converts he had made. Of course I purchased this unique collection for my museum. The thought suddenly struck me that after all the coachman’s theory is not wholly new. I remembered the story of Deucalion and Pyrrha, and turned to my ‘ Ovid,’ where we have the stony origin of mankind set forth long ago. The following is the history of Deucalion :—The son of Prometheus, King of Thessaly, and husband of Pyrrha, daughter of Epimetheus. In his reign came the deluge, or universal flood, which drowned all the world. BEASTS, BIRDS, AND FISHES. 139 Only he and his wife got into a small ship, which was carried to Mount Parnassus, and there stayed; and there dry land first appeared, after the waters were abated. He, consulting with the oracle of Themis how mankind might be repaired, was answered, if he cast his great mother’s bones behind his back; whereupon he and his wife cast stones over their shoulders, and they became men and women. Here are the very lines of Ovid. The oracle says to Deucalion and Pyrrha,— Discedite templo ; Et velate caput; cinctasque resolvite vestes ; _ Ossaque post tergum magne jactate parentis. Pyrrha, with a woman’s instinct, guesses who the great parent is. : Magna parens terra est ; lapides in corpore terre Ossa reor dici ; jacere hos post terga jubemur. Then they go and throw the stones, and the stones thrown by Deucalion turn into men, and those by Pyrrha turn into women. The gradual metamorphosis of the stones into men and women is too long to quote, but is one of Ovid’s very best bits. He winds up by saying that the origin of the human race from stone accounts for the hardihood of mankind. Inde genus durum sumus, experiensque laborum ; Ex documenta damus, qua simus origine nati. May not, again, the idea of the origin of mankind from stones be in some mysterious way connected with the real fact so well put in the following words, ‘ Pulvis et wmbra 140 PRE-ADAMITE LITTLE MEN, ETC. suwmus’? or to go further back, may it not be an instinctive hazy idea of what we read and believe in Genesis, *‘ And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground’? When going over Melrose Abbey I found the same idea embodied in the following beautiful epitaph :-— The Earth gaueth The Earth hutlyg On the Earth On the Garth Glistring like goly. Castles and Towers, The Earth ques to the Earth he Earth sans to the Garth Suoner than tt wold ; AM shall be ours. 141 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘ JACKAL,’ THE Herring Commission of Inquiry being duly appointed by the Home Office in August 1877, it became the duty of my colleagues, Messrs. Walpole and Young, and myself to arrange our plans, in order that our official duties of inquiry might be performed as efficiently as lay in our power. After due consideration we determined to hold our courts of inquiry on the east coast of Scotland previously to visiting the west coast and the outlying islands, inasmuch as during the month of August the herring fishery on the east coast is at its full height, whereas on the west coast the fishings do not begin till the spring of the year, and we had been informed that we should meet on the east coast with many of the fishing crews of the west coast, fish-curers, as well as the fishery officers of the Scotch White Herring Fishery Board. Those who followed the published reports in the papers of our various inquiries might like to know the exact order in which the courts were held on the east coast. I therefore give them in their proper order :— Edinburgh, Eyemouth, Anstruther, Montrose, Aberdeen, Peterhead, Fraserburgh, Banff, Buckie, Lossiemouth, Burghead, Inverness, Brora, Helmsdale and Wick. 142 THE CRUISE OF. THE ‘JACKAL.’ It then became necessary to continue our inquiry into — the fisheries of the Orkneys and Shetlands, and also many of the outlying places on the west. For this purpose the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty placed at our disposal H.M. gunboat ‘Jackal.’ The ‘Jackal’ first met the Commission at Aberdeen on September 4, 1877, and there the plan of our future expeditions was arranged with Captain Digby. H.MLS. ‘Jackal’ is a gunboat of 340 tons; her length is 160 feet ; her breadth 25 feet; her horse-power 150; officers and men, 60. I find that if the roof were taken off the church I attend, St. Mary Magdalene, Munster Square, Regent’s Park, and the ‘ Jackal’ let bodily down into it, she would exactly fit the main aisle. Her bow- sprit, however, would project considerably beyond the east window of the church. She is a paddle-wheel steamer, built in 1845, and lately repaired at Devonport. One of her first duties was to act as an escort tu her Majesty Queen Adelaide when visiting Madeira. She has also been to the West Coast of Africa, and, as far as I could judge, had escaped fever. | The ‘ Jackal’isa splendid sea-boat. Her officers know her little peculiarities; she is a good, smart, obedient, crea- ture, and does her best to perform her various duties in looking after the herring fisheries. She has a nose as keen as her African four-footed namesake (Canis aureus) for anything going wrong with British herring interests on the coasts of Scotland, and she helps much to provide the British Lion with food, in the shape of thousands of crans of herrings. THE CRUISE OF -THE ‘JACKAL,’ 143 We held our court at Wick early on the morning of September 4, and the same afternoon started to board the ‘ Jackal,’ then lying with her steam up. When walking down to the pier, through Pulteney Town, I was perfectly amazed at the wonderful fleet of herring boats in the harbour; they were so close and thick together that it would not have been difficult to walk from one side of the harbour to the other across the boats without seeing the water. The quays were also covered with herring barrels, all disposed orderly and in due form, forming a vast army of herring barrels, each set bearing its own peculiar brand as affixed thereon by the Government officers. The captain’s boat, called the ‘whale boat,’ was waiting at the pier-head, manned by four sailors and a coxswain to steer. They were true British man-o'-war’s-men, fine strong active brave tars. We were assisted down the very slippery stairs, the luggage neatly piled away, the boat shoved off, and we were away. I had never in my life before been on board either a man-o’-war or a boat belonging to a man-o’-war. I was, therefore, entering into a new phase of existence, of which, you may be sure, I was not unwilling totake advantage. The extraordinary ease with which the captain’s boat went through the water was surprising tome. The men were such thorough oarsmen that the boat slipped through the water with an easy velocity which I only once before experienced, and that was when riding in Sir Benjamin Brodie’s London visiting carriage, the most comfortable carriage that ever was or ever will be invented. The whale-boat was soon alongside the ‘ Jackal,’ and 144 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ when we got near, the man pulling the bow oar laidin his | oar and cleverly caught his ship’s side with a boat-hook. Captain Digby was on deck to receive us. Of course, the moment I set foot on the deck of the ‘ Jackal,’ I raised my hat in salute tothe commanding officer. Her Majesty, too, is supposed to be always present on board the British ships of war. Captain Digby introduced us to the officers of the ship, who at once, by their kindly welcome, made us feel quite at home. Preparations were at once made for starting, and for the first time I heard the merry boatswain’s pipe. In obedience to the pipe the sailors came running from the forecastle to hoist in the boat. The run of the man-o’- war’s man is peculiar; it is a short, quick, heavy tramp ; the men get over the ground very quickly, and seem to concentrate their strength in a manner that only efficient training could bring about. At a given word the men caught hold of a rope, pulling all together; up came the boat and hung on the davits, where she was properly secured. Then came another pipe from the bow of the ship, and a hoarse kind of order, whigh I afterwards found out to signify ‘ All hands up anchor.’ It sounded thus, ‘ A-l-l h-a-n-d s-u-p a-n-k-e-r-r-r-r !’ Everything seemed to be regulated in the most perfect clock-like manner by means of the boatswain’s far re- sounding whistle, piping merrily to the musical click of » the capstan, the iron tongue of which gave out a sound like the hammer on a blacksmith’s anvil. The anchor being up, I heard sundry sharp tings of musical bells, the meaning of which the engineer officer explained to me ——————————e + THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 145 as signals to the engine-room, the paddles then began to turn slowly, and we were off. The first thing the ‘Jackal’ had to do was to pass through a fleet of herring vessels coming in with their fish and nets. There was not much wind, and the steering of the ‘ Jackal’ was, I need hardly say, simply perfect. Having got clear of the herring boats, the captain gave a signal for full speed, and the paddles began their pit-pat, pit-pat. Captain Digby having arranged all the affairs connected with the ship, then invited us down to luncheon, the first of many acts of courtesy for which we were indebted to him. Luncheon over we went on deck, and for the first time entered the chart-house, a comfortable little deck-house in which the ship’s charts and all other necessary paraphernalia of navigation are kept. We were by this time off Duncansby Head, the extreme N.E. promontory in Scotland, and the principal outpost of that terrible place, the Pentland Firth. In the distance we could see the Great and Lesser Skerries, and the Isle of Stroma. As we passed the Pentland Firth, between Duncansby Head and South Ronaldsha, the ship rolled considerably ; it was not a disagreeable motion. The officers told me it might have been on account of a gale somewhere away in the Atlantic to the westward, or else that it was due to the rapid currents of the Firth. The waves were ugly, dark-looking fellows, and could have been very nasty had they chosen to put on their white night-caps, and give a ball in honour of the ‘ Jackal’ and her pas- sengers. Not liking these big waves, I consulted friend Young’s barometer, and recollecting the old Horatian L . 146 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL’ sailor (Horace, Ode III.) who went on the perfidious sea for the first time in a brazen cuirass lined with oak, I vowed a testimonial to Young’s barometer if it gave good weather during the cruise of the ‘ Jackal.’ This votive offering had the desired effect, for we escaped really bad weather throughout our wanderings in Scotland. Through the Pentland Firth rushes the great eastern Gulf Stream of the vast Atlantic, flowing with the tremendous force of united tides through the narrow opening between the mainland and the Orkneys—an awful place, where King Neptune lives, and where his racehorses frequently get loose and have a stampede. When we were about three parts across the Firth we saw the headland on the extreme south of South Ronaldsha. Gradually nearing it, a big steamer was re- ported by the look-out man. This was the ‘Pharos,’ the Government steamer of the Northern Lighthouse Board, which carries oil supplies to the lighthouses on the northern coasts of Scotland. When we got to the eastward of South Ronaldsha the ocean swell began to abate, and the ‘ Jackal’ seemed to shake herself for a fresh start, having successfully erossed over the eight miles of turbulent and angry waters which form such a barrier between the Orkneys and the ' mainland. When we got to a certain point on the ocean, which the captain had marked out by a pencil dot on the chart, a wave of his hand to the steersman caused the ‘ Jackal’ to point her nose to the west: we then went on a westerly course till we arrived at a small island called Thieves Holm, near the west end of Shapensha Bay, and then we saw the lights of Kirkwall town; the red light THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 147 at the head of the pier showed the authorities of the ship where the anchorage lay. Again once more the cheery boatswain’s pipe, and orders were given to stand by for letting go the anchor. The ship began to go slow, slow, slower, slower, stop. At last Captain Digby’s orders came to let go the anchor ; instantly, the boatswain’s pipe, the musical rattle of the chain cable as the anchor plunged with a foam and a rush into the dark waters, and we were at Kirkwall. We then had to go ashore in the boat, a proceeding I did not like at all, for it was pitch dark, and we had to thread our way through a lot of craft at anchor; but the officer commanding the boat brought us to the pier all right. Having arrived late the night before at Kirkwall, and having to hold an inquiry at ten the next morning, and leave at three in the afternoon, I had not much time to look about. By getting up early, and by sacrificing luncheon, I was able to get a general view of the place. The following facts I have picked up from various sources. In Orkney there are sixty-seven islands, out of which twenty-seven are inhabited. The population in 1871 was 31,241. The largest island is Pomona, on which Kirkwall is built. The town consists of one long, narrow street, of foreign aspect, swarming with children. I went into the office of the Orcadian newspaper, and was sur- prised at being recognised by the editor, who at once thanked me on behalf of the pigs of Newcastle for what I had done for them. I could not recollect much about it till he told me that I had written an article in Land and Water in June 1871 urging the necessity of placing drinking-troughs for the poor pigs that were brought to L2 «, 7 148 * THE CRUISE OF THE: ‘ JACKAL,’ the Newcastle market, sick and seedy after their long voyage from Ireland. The result of this article, this gentleman in Kirkwall told me, was that the pigs now have proper drinking-troughs placed for their accommo- dation in the market at Newcastle. It is impossible to fix the exact date at which One was discovered, but a Danish historian states it to be about three hundred and eighty-five years before Christ. Dunnet Head, in Caithness, was designated Cape Orcas before the birth of Christ. (Query, is Delphinus Orea, the ca’ing’ whale, so named from this promontory?) The Roman Emperor Claudius invaded and conquered these islands. Those brave and clever soldiers, the Romans, seem to have been everywhere in Scotland. I wonder whether Claudius issued rations of herrings and finnon haddies to his soldiers? The name Kirkwall, as Anglicised, is the Danish word Kirkjuvagr (Kirkevaag), signifying Churchbay, a capital name, as the church stands quite at the end of the bay. Looking out of the hotel window in the early morning I could see St. Magnus Cathedral, a venerable pile seven hundred years old; built in the reign of Henry II., A.D. 1177. Itis built of red sandstone, and is not at all unlike Yarmouth Church on a small scale. I had not time to go into the cathedral, but observed that the sandstone at the great gate was very weather-worn in consequence of the stone slabs not having been placed flat, as they lay in the quarry, but turned upon end. The same weather-. worn appearance I have noted on the stonework of the door of Durham Cathedral. I was told I ought to go to visit the ‘ Maeshow,’ about nine miles from Kirkwall, to see some wonderful Druidical % THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 149 remains. The meaning of the word Maeshow is not known.. It was a great chambered barrow built on the surface of the ground, and afterwards covered with layers of small stones and earth. The stones of Stennis, near Kirkwall, are also remark- able Druidical remains; there are thirteen stones upright, and ten in number have fallen down. I wanted to see if I could find any confirmation of the idea that the Druids used to get these heavy stones placed one on the other by utilis- ing earth or snow; but unfortunately I had not time to go and see them. On Salisbury Plain the Druids first made firm the two uprights ; they then made an inclined plane of snow, and levered the third stone on to the two uprights; when the snow melted, of course the stone remained in situ, and the means by which it had got there were not apparent. Common earth would have served the same purpose. This at least is my theory. In a shop immediately opposite the hotel, I observed some curious soft shawls, such as I had never seen before, and also some remarkable thick woollen fishermen’s socks, made in bright Spanish-looking colours. These shawls are hand-knitted by the fisher wives of Shetland. They are most industrious women, and knit all day long when the husbands are out fishing. The socks are made in Fair Island, of which more presently. Speaking of woollen goods, Mr. Bartlett informs me that recently he had some wool sent him to know from. what animal it had been taken. He proved that it was wool pulled from the large mastiff of Thibet, another instance of my friend’s great sagacity. 150 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ When the official meeting was over at Kirkwall, the crew in the captain’s whale-boat came up to the landing- place to get our luggage. We got into the boat, and were quickly once again on board the ‘ Jackal.’ Immediately on our arrival on board the boatswain began to pipe up, and the sailors to trot merrily about the beautifully clean decks. We went below at once to luncheon, and soon perceived, from the noise above, that the ‘Jackal’ was getting under way. This time her nose was pointed due east, and away she went, pit-pat, pit-pat with her paddles through the beauti- fully clear water. We -shortly passed the island of Shapensha. Before we started from Kirkwall the captain gave the order, ‘Leadsman in the chains!’ Immediately in the centre of the paddle-box stands the leadsman. The lead consists of a long, heavy weight, like an enormous clock-weight. This the man swings well forward in such a manner that the weight shall be at the bottom by the time the ship has made her way up to the lead. The plunge made by the lead into the sea sounds to a lands- man like a heavy thud, and is a good imitation, on a small scale, of Zazel taking her dive into the net from the top of Westminster Aquarium. The lead takes down with it a lot of air, and as the big bubbles ascend from the bottom of the sea, gives the appearance of a rocket with a long tail of diamonds. The navigating lieutenant was with the captain on the stage between the paddle-boxes di- recting the steering of the vessel, and this without the least noise, so perfectly are all duties carried out on board this admirably managed ship. Captain Digby allowed me x ae Pe et) ee 8 ee ee THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL, 151 to examine the navigation charts. To a landsman like myself the numerous figures on these maps are not ‘usually very interesting, but when out on the ocean among a lot of islands, the figures assume a personal interest. In these maps the lighthouses are marked with a tiny red spot, surrounded by yellow. The course of the ship is laid down on the chart by the officers in a pencil line, according to the lights and headlands. The first land we saw after leaving North Ronaldsha was Fair Island, a very interesting place. From the deck it appeared like a huge solitary rock, without trees, herbage, or habitations: Dorsum immane mari summo. Of course we did not land on this island, it being a very dangerous place ; and, in fact, there are only two points where access can be obtained by boats. It is here that in 1588 one of the ships composing the Spanish Armada was wrecked; some of the survivors are said to have re- mained on the island; it is believed that the present inhabitants have a mixture of Iberian blood in their veins. The women are famous for their skill in knitting curiously bright coloured stockings, the patterns of which are said to have been taught them by the shipwrecked Spanish seamen. No grain is grown on this island, consequently supplies must be sent from Orkney or Shetland. I learnt that the honest fishermen of Fair Island, having such few opportunities of communication with the mainland, - are most greedy after newspapers, and that they will come out in their boats to beg for newspapers which are thrown to them from the passing steamers. 152 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ Wishing to know more about this curious place, I sent a copy of Land and Water, directing it to the Principal Inhabitant, Fair Island. In due course of time I received from Mr. W. Lawrence, of Fair Island, a long and in- teresting letter, of which I now give an abstract. Fair Island lies in mid-channel between the Orkney and Shetland Islands, twenty-five miles distant from each group ; it forms part of the parish of Dunrossness, which is the southernmost part of the mainland of Shetland. It is about three miles long by about one and a half broad. In clear weather the Orkney and Shetland Islands can be seen from it, but when the weather is in the least hazy or overcast nothing can be seen but the rolling waves of the Atlantic and German Oceans, whose action on its coast-line has hollowed out many deep caverns, while pyramidal stacks and cliffs rise perpendicularly from one to seven hundred feet above the level of the sea, forming rock scenery grand beyond description, and a safe retreat for the countless number of seafowl of all kinds which repair to it during the breeding season. The name Fair Isle is evidently a corruption of Faraoc, . which signifies in Icelandic Isle of Sheep. Torfacus calls it Fava in his historical account of Orkney and Shetland, and tells how the leader of Earl Ronald’s expedition against Earl Paul crossed from Orkney to Shetland, landed in the Isle of Westray, and wrenched the islands from the grasp of his rival. This is an historical fact of the middle of the twelfth century, and the present inhabitants of Fair Isle have the same legend by tradition, without any historical record of it. The same tumuli, sepulchral steatite urns, and rude stone implements, which are so : 1 als eset , 6 ee THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 153 numerous in the Orkney and Shetland Islands, are also found here. The present population of the island is about 200, nearly equally divided between males and females.. Fishing and farming form their principal occupations. The fishing is prosecuted in their small fragile skiffs, which are only the first step above the Greenlander’s canoe, yet in them the fishermen feel safe in all weathers, and as there is generally an inexhaustible supply of fish around the shores of the island, they seldom fail to earn sufficient for a competent livelihood. The fish are sold to the proprietor of the island, who salts and cures them and sends them to market. The principal fish caught are cod, ling, and saith. . Each fisherman holds a croft or small farm of from five to ten acres on the pastoral part of the island, which is about two-thirds of the whole. On this they keep from one to three cows, two or three ponies for bring- ing peats from the hill, and a few sheep and poultry. The islanders are thus supplied with milk, butter, eggs, potatoes, fish, and mutton or beef for winter use. The proprietor of the island also has a store, where all sorts of groceries, fishing material, &c., are kept, and he makes an annual visit for the purpose of settling with the fishermen and doing any other work required. The gross rental is about 150/. There is no poverty under any ordinary circumstances. There is an excellent library, the gift of Lady John Scott, of Spottiswoode. In point of intelligence the active Fair Islander will make a favourable comparison with any of his own rank or class in either the Orkney or Shetland Islands. The establish- 154 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL,’ ment of regular postal communication has proved a great boon to the people. Fair Island has been the scene of many disastrous shipwrecks. From its position in the centre of a gateway between the Atlantic and German Oceans, where great and yearly increasing numbers of vessels are continually passing and repassing, in clear weather it proves an excellent beacon to guide the approaching mariner; but in dark nights or foggy weather, surrounded by rapid tides and dangerous eddies, and without a lighthouse, it has too often proved itself a dangerous rock, on which many a goodly ship has been dashed to pieces. In 1868 the German ship ‘Lessing,’ with 465 emigrants on board, ran into the island during a dense fog. This, fortu- nately, happened during fine weather, and the emigrants were saved; but the vessel, which was valued at nearly 30,000/., became a total wreck. In 1877 no fewer than five known wrecks took place on the island, the estimated value of which was above 30,000/. Happily only two lives were lost in these; but during December 1876 the wreckage showed that two vessels at least had run into the island in dark nights, and not a soul was left to tell the tale. The island seems to be a general rendezvous for all sorts of seafowl common to the Northern Ocean. The common and black-backed gull and the kittiwake are here the whole year, but are much more numerous | during the breeding season than at any other time. The eider-duck, the guillemot, the puffin and sheldrake come — about the middle of April and remain till October. The puffin and guillemot seem by general consent to have fixed THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 155 on the 12th of August as the day of their departure. Thousands may be seen a day or two before that date, but only a few solitary birds after it. The little black guillemot remains here the whole year. The Solan goose and fulmar come after the breeding season. The stormy petrels breed here, but though their young are frequently seen the nests are rarely if ever found. Swans and many different kinds of geese visit the island yearly for a few days in spring and the begin- ning of winter. Nearly all the different kinds of cormorants are found here the whole year round; they often drift ashore in considerable numbers, dead or very much weather-beaten, during long-continued storms. Although many different kinds of duck may be seen, the eider-duck appears to be the only one that breeds here. Herons come in great numbers during autumn; as many as twenty may be seen at a time, but more generally they arrive in pairs. Some time ago a pair of white-tailed eagles had their nest on the island, but they have now deserted it. The white falcon is often seen during winter. Goshawks, sparrow-hawks, and merlins are very numerous. There are only five pairs of ravens, but a great number of hooded crows. Owls and rooks come in considerable numbers during autumn, especially after strong gales of south-east winds, and generally remain all winter; probably they are blown across from Norway. Wild pigeons are very numerous, and so are starlings. Plover, snipe, lapwings, curlew, sandlarks, and dunlins are also pretty plentiful. Larks, linnets, sparrows, wrens, redbreasts, wagtails (both, the common and pied), are plentiful also. The swallow visits the island in his season. 156 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ The birds are allowed the full freedom of the island without molestation, with the exception of the gulls and eider-ducks, on whose nests terrible raids are made. Every nest that can be reached by any means is pillaged either for the eggs or for the young birds when they are ready to fly. Many a good meal is made both on the eggs and the birds. Frequently as many as twenty-four dozen young birds are taken at a time. Great numbers are also caught in gins for the sake of the feathers; but with all the slaughter they never seem to be missed out of the common stock. Fish abound, cod, saith and ling being the principal kinds caught. The saith is the chief fishing of the island, but great numbers of cod are annually taken within half a mile of the shores of the island by smacks from Orkney and Shetland. The Dutch carry off great quantities of herrings during the months of June and July. A few barrels of herrings are sometimes taken by the fishermen here when they ‘pan,’ which means when they are forced above the surface of the water by the saith; the fishermen then scoop them into their boats with hand-nets: this gene- rally occurs in the month of August. Numbers of large whales are always seen for a few weeks during the autumn while the herrings are on the coast; they often come within rifle-shot of the shore day after day for a week at a time. The ca’ing whale is never driven ashore here. There are a good number of seals, the large white seal (Phoca barbata) and the common little black seal: they are frequently caught by the fishermen; they lie up in the caves, and the THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 157 fishermen go in with clubs and kill them; sometimes as many as five being killed at a time. The large ones are about twelve feet long, and the small ones about half that size. There is a large fish that comes along and commits great havoc among the. seals about the month of November. It is said to be from twenty-five to thirty feet long, but not thick in proportion to itslength. There are no otters on the island, and the only wild animals are the rabbit and the mouse. Captain Digby told us that the people on the island of St. Kilda, another desolate island on the extreme west coast of Scotland, complained of a very peculiar disease, called the ‘boat fever.’ It appears that for years past, after a boat has landed on the island, the people have been subject to a kind of feverish attack. This they call the ‘boat fever.’ This boat fever is no new thing; it has been recorded as being in existence a hundred years ago. I think I am close on the solution of this phenomenon. The fever only occurs on St. Kilda when a stranger boat lands, and only when the wind is blowing from the east. The cause I believe to be as follows: St. Kilda is such a precipitous island that boats can only land when the wind is blowing from the east. When the wind does blow from the east, the people in the island are seized with a kind of influenza cold; and this influenza is imputed not to the wind, but to the arrival of the boats. I was told at Lerwick of another disease which was new to me. It is a peculiar disease of the eye, brought about by the presence of herrings. To guess at this disease would be almost impossible, but when the facts 158 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ are known the reason becomes apparent. The scales of the herring are very thin, and like very thin glass. They fit very loosely into pockets in the skin of the fish. The women, in the operation of cleaning the herrings, handle them very quickly; the scales are rubbed off in flakes like snow, and are rubbed from the hands into the eyes; they then get under the eyelids, and can hardly be seen, being so transparent. The only way to get them out is for the operator to open the eyelids quite wide, and lick out the herring-scales with the tongue. Engine- drivers and people connected with railways, or travellers on railways, sometimes catch a speck of cinder in the eye; this gets under the lid, and, being almost invisible, can with difficulty be removed. Engine-drivers, I am told, are very clever at getting the ashes, splinters, &c., out of the eye by means of the tongue. As we passed Fair Island a great number of sea-gulls came in the track of the vessel, to pick up what bits they could get. As the cook in preparing dinner threw the scraps over into the sea, it was very wonderful to see with what great ease these lovely birds kept up with the ‘Jackal,’ without apparently any effort. I luckily had some herrings in my pocket; these I cut up into bits and threw overboard for the gulls. It was very amus- ing to see how quickly the birds saw a bit of herring not larger than one’s thumb floating on the white and ruffled waters caused by the paddles of the ship. The lot of them would make a struggle for it, and when one got it the others would hunt him and try to steal it from him. After the successful gull had swallowed his bit, the others would all fly back again at once up to the ship, even THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 159 though it had left them almost out of sight astern. Two or three of the gulls came quite close over the ship’s wheel, and I could see with what ease they turned their head as if it were upon a pivot, in search of food. Their little black eyes seemed to say, ‘ Please don’t hurt us. Give us a bit more herring; we have a long way to fly back home to Fair Island.’ While the gulls were off having a row over a whole herring, I asked the captain’s permission to try to catch one of them. Wherever I go I carry fishing tackle. Having tied two salmon lines together, I first of all ground-baited with chopped herring and bits of paper, with herring screwed up, and then tried them with a Thames trout spinning tackle, baited with a portion of a herring’s tail. But it was no go; they would not bite. They came close to it, but were too suspicious to make a final swoop down upon it. I then tried a spoon bait, an artificial minnow, and a sand eel, but in vain, the rascals would not be caught, and all I got for my trouble was a nice chaffing from the officers, one of whom tried to play mea trick by putting on to my hooks a fresh-caught burn trout. So in trying to gull the gulls I got gulled myself. In the distance we saw several gannets at work. They came splashing down into the water with tremendous force. When soaring, the gannet’s wings are extended to the utmost. When he takes his header he forms his wings into the shape of a W; this W is gradually closed, and before he reaches the water the wings are shut up close to the body, the loose feathers of the neck forming a fender to the shoulder of the wing, so as to slip easily into the water. 160 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ Instead of swooping like a gull, the gannet drops almost perpendicularly from a great height into the sea, causing the water to splash up. By an admirable struc- ture the gannet is enabled to blow the whole of his body full of air, so that in fact he becomes an animated balloon, the skin also being divided into air cells. I am more ~ convinced than ever of the wonderful adaptation of means to ends as seen in the structure of the gannet. Captain Digby told me that on March 19, 1877, the ‘ Jackal’ came across a lot of herring nets between Ailsa Craig and Ballantrae, on the Ayrshire coast. The nets were floating on the surface with a great quantity of herringsinthem. Besides the herrings, there were several gannets caught by the neck in the meshes of the net. The gannets had dived, as usual, from a great height on to the floating herrings, had thrust their long-pointed beaks through the meshes of the nets, and so were drowned. I was told quite a new story about gannets, which breed very abundantly in Scotland. When these birds are building, they steal materials for the nest one from the other. If the thief gannet is caught in the act, the bird to whom the property belongs gives the thief a good thrashing, which she takes quietly, and as a matter of course. If the thief is not detected stealing, she flies out to sea with the stolen property, and then returns looking very innocent, and pretending that she had got it away at sea. So we learn that there are humbugs among birds as among our noble selves. Just after passing Ailsa Crag the sun went down, and it began to get very dark and cold. We adjourned to the ; | | i i THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 161 captain’s cabin, and after hearing many interesting stories from our friend Bartlett, coiled up for sleep, Captain Digby kindly giving me permission to turn out with him when the look-out men reported the light off Sumburgh Head, the southernmost point of the Ultima Thule of Scotland, the Shetlands. About two in the morning I heard the door of the cabin open gently, while at the same time ‘ Jack,’ the captain’s dog, gave a threatening growl. I was awake in a moment, and looking up, found that the cabin was dimly illuminated by a lantern. A wet-looking man, dressed in a suit of shiny waterproof, entered the cabin. This was the gruff-voiced boatswain of the middle watch, come to call the captain. I was out on the floor in the ‘shake of a sheep’s tail,’ as they say in Oxfordshire, and hurried up on deck. The ‘ Jackal’ was out in the ocean ; it was dark, O so very dark! To quote the beautiful poetry of Ossian, who wrote his Homer-like poem nearly sixteen hundred years ago,— Dark were the clouds of the sky : great was the darkness among the clouds of night. Night had settled with all her clouds on the hill, Gloomy and dark, like the gathering of the rain-clouds behind the meteors of heaven. The night is gathered around, let us wish for the moon of heaven. Except the watch on deck, and those on duty, deep sleep sealed the eyes of all those on board the ‘ Jackal.’ Jamque fere mediam cli nox humida metam Contigerat ; placida laxarant membra quiete, Sub remis taciti per dura sedilia naute. M 162 » THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ It is a curious fact that all men sleep soundest just before sunrise. This is the time when savages always make their attacks. The ship alone appeared neither to slumber nor sleep; she rolled her ponderous but graceful form with a majestic motion as she met the dark rolling seas of the ocean, and dipped her head as if acknowledging their superiority. Tollimur in cceelum curvato gurgite, et idem Subducta ad manes imos desidimus unda. Her engines alone were not tired; unceasing in their efforts, they drove her still through the vast, blue rolling waves. What would not Atneas of old have given for a ‘gunboat when out on his exploring expeditions, with an account of which he so humbugged poor Queen Dido. ‘Pius Atneas,’ as he had the impudence to call himself, was not much ofa sailor. He was a ‘Soldier Officer,’ and he and his pilot Palinurus made a nice mess of it when they managed to run their ship (what a curiosity she must have been!) high and dry on the rocks. I went to the compass in front of the wheel, with a salute to the two silent man-of-war’s-men who had com- mand of the wheel, and looked at her course. Having ascertained her whereabouts, I was enabled to see how very steady she was going on the course the captain had marked out for her. There was a lovely bright star right ahead of the ship, and as she rose to the seas her bow- sprit seemed to be attracted, as if by a magnet, to this star. Armatumque auro circumspicit Oriona. The end of her bowsprit was like the foil in the hands of e + ’ ee yy. ae THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 163 an able fencer preparing for the attack. It tana gently, first to the right from the star, made a complete Circuit ‘round the star, and then lunged forward direct at her again. Looking over the side of the vessel, I could just make out the huge ocean billows over which the ‘ Jackal ’ was riding with the ease of a sleeping sea-bird. I confess I looked very respectfully indeed at those big dark waves; they seemed as though they had not quite made up their mind as to whether they had King Neptune’s orders to come on board the ‘ Jackal’ or not. I gazed steadily at them, and found that, as the ship heeled over, they simply peeped over the ship’s bulwarks to see who was on board. They found on board the Commissioners, looking after Neptune’s children—the herrings; so they let us pass forward over their mighty shoulders. For’ this I was deeply obliged. I found the captain in the chart-room, consulting with the navigating lieutenant, who had piloted the ship through the darkness of the night. So nicely were the reckonings made that I was told that in twenty minutes’ time we should see the light at Sumburgh Head, and sure enough within a minute or two of the appointed time I saw the great bright single eye of this island Cyciops winking at us in the far distance— Argolici clipei aut Phoebeze lampadis instar ; as much as to say, ‘Come on, my boys, all right; only don’t come too near me, please! ’ Sumburgh Head is just the place where one might expect to find the cannibal Cyclops giant Polyphemus, whose only eye Ulysses put out with a red-hot pointed u 2 164 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ stick. One might almost expect Polyphemus to appear on the top of the cliff. If he had come, Captain Digby would, I am sure, have sent a war-rocket after him. We sat down and watched. Gradually the dawn of the morning became more and more apparent. ‘The warriors of the night moved on, the ghosts swam away on gloomy clouds;’ by degrees the lonely and _ treeless mountains of Ultima Thule appeared on the sky-line. We were approaching good old Virgil’s Penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos. It was indeed a lovely morning. I saw indistinctly, just as it was daylight, something right in the track of the vessel; another moment, and just as the figure-head of the ship, viz., the wooden portrait of a jackal, came over the objects, up went two guillemots, and scudded away as fast as wings could carry them. These fellows had been sleeping out at sea, and had not yet awakened till the ‘ Jackal’ was near upon them. As it gradually got lighter, I made out the form of Sumburgh Head, so beautifully described by Sir Walter Scott in the introduction to the ‘ Pirate.’ Shortly after passing Sumburgh Head I turned in again for forty winks, as I was aware we had a hard day’s work before us at Lerwick. When I again turned out it was full day, and we were gradually drawing into the comparatively smooth water between the island of Bressay. and the mainland. Lerwick is a splendid harbour. It is about a mile wide, and being three miles in length it affords ample and secure rendezvous for a large fleet. In the year 1650 the English navy, consisting of ninety-four a THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 165 men-of-war, lay for some time in the bay; and twelve years afterwards another fleet of ninety sail remained there for some days. The moment the anchor was down off Lerwick the captain’s boat took us ashore. It was early morning when we arrived, and there were not many people about. The first thing that struck me on landing was the great number of whale skulls lying about, being chiefly used as supports to keep the fishing-boats upright. I understand that whales come in here in considerable quantities in the spring of the year. Healtaland, or Shetland, is a wonderful archipelago, consisting of more than a hundred islands. The sea-coast on the mainland is broken up and indented with deep bays, locally called ‘voes.’ In Cornwall, similar places are called ‘zawns.’ Round the majestic cliffs and towering headlands the turbulent surges caused by the currents of the ocean are called ‘ rousts.’ In England, similar places are called ‘races,’ as the ‘ Race of Portland, &e. The ‘sheep, as well as the ponies, are very small in Shetland. The sheep give the wool from which the shawls are made. In the high latitude of Shetland the light of day at mid- summer never totally disappears, and the smallest print can be read at midnight, when the lingering rays of the preceding day mingle with and give way to early dawn of the morrow. During winter the nights are proportionally long and dreary, and in the month of December the sun is not above the horizon more than five hours and twenty minutes. Besides the herring fishery in Shetland, there are the ‘ sreatlings ° fishings, which means the great fish fishings \ 166 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ with long lines. Among the fish thus caught are, I believe, the very large halibut, and another northern fish called the torsk—Gadus brosme, or Brosmus vulgaris. This fish somewhat resembles the ling, only it is thicker in proportion to the length. I unfortunately was unable to get a specimen in a fresh state; the nearest approach being a salted fellow, split, and without a head. So I could not ‘make him up.’ All over Scotland I observed that the nets and long lines are frequently buoyed by dogs’ skins. They catch Mr. Dog, kill him, cut off his head, and turn his skin inside out, hair inside; they tar the outside, then tie up his legs, and put a wooden plug into his neck, and blow him up quite tight by means of a plug in one of his legs. They tie the plug on to the buoy rope, and the dog’s tail and hind legs floating on the surface of the water have avery curious appearance. For some reason they don’t turn cats into buoys, and pigs are too expensive. The month of May is specially dangerous for dogs, as buoys are then wanted. Mr. Dog gets a crack on the head, is turned inside out, blown up and tarred, and in a quarter of an hour is anchored to a net out at sea. I think it would puzzle anybody, even a judge at a dog show, to swear to his dog when blown up without a head, and turned inside out. Captain Digby has on board the ‘ Jackal’ a wonderfully nice black © dog, a faithful kind creature. I am afraid Jack (for that is his name) will end his earthly career as a buoy to a herring-net, so please look after poor Jack in the month of May. On looking at the map of the north of Scotland I cannot help thinking that at some time or other the THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL,’ 167 Shetlands were joined to the Orkneys, the Orkneys to the north of Caithness, Cape Wrath to the Butt of Lewis, that is the extreme northern point of the Hebrides; the island Barra, the extreme south of the Hebrides, to the Mull of Cantyre, 724 the islands of Toree and Islay, and that when the continent was broken up, on the west coast a large inland sea was formed, divided into two, as it were, by the Isle of Skye, the northern sea being now called the Minch, the southern seathe Little Minch. The con- formation of this part of Scotland has great effect upon the migrations of the herring, the season for herring fishing on the west coast being very much earlier than on the east coast. : . I confess that before I got half-way through the her- ring inspection, I got quite tired of scenery, everlasting mountains, and solitude. I dislike much the words ‘ tourist’ and ‘ picturesque.’ Towards the end of the journey I positively refused to look at any more scenery of any kind. At Oban I saw an omnibus and a four-wheeled cab, which reminded me, to my delight, of my native home. I would suggest to those hotel-keepers and others, who make an easy living out of the mountains, which, poor things, do not get any share of the plunder, that the mountains should be all properly numbered and labelled, ike plants at a flower show. I think that a little variety in the names would also be advisable. It is always Ben this or Glen that, every day and all day long. And allow me to inform my readers that there are no hills in Scotland. A friend of mine asked a bystander, pointing to the distance, ‘ Pray may I ask, what is that hill?’ .‘ Hill, sir? It is nota 168 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ hill at all; it’s a mountain,’ was the answer. In the same way, a visitor to a kennel of foxhounds said to the huntsman, ‘ What a fine dog that is!’ ‘Dog, sir? It’s not a dog; it’s a hound,’ said the huntsman. I must give my colleague, Mr. A. Young, due credit for the admirable way in which he piloted us through Scotland. Mr. Young has a most extraordinary memory for localities and figures. He has apparently the whole of Scotland mapped out in his mind, and he astonished us mightily during our journeyings by telling us off-hand and with the greatest accuracy the height of almost every mountain we saw, the depthsand fishing capabilities of every loch, the lengths and peculiarities of every salmon river, and the names of the proprietors of most of the shooting lodges and gentlemen’s: properties that are to be met with so plentifully in Scotland. I cannot pretend to recollect one quarter of what Young told us, but my general im- pression of these properties is that no one in Scotland has less than 20,0000. a year, and that the proper thing to do when one has made a fortune is to find out a desolate, barren island where Robinson Crusoe himself would be uncomfortable, or a lonely moor where there is nothing but barren rock and heather, and where, as Colonel —— informed me, the distance from civilisation is so great ‘that he was obliged to give his chimney-sweep a bed.’ There, in these desolate places, do the rich people establish their Lares and Penates. I think I have found the reason why people who have made fortunes go and live in desolate places, like so many Robinson Crusoes. In his original state, man depends for THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ 169 his existence on hunting, and hunts wild beasts and birds, in order to obtain his necessary food and clothes. © When he has obtained all the food he can possibly want, and every luxury he can possibly get, then what does he do? Why, he immediately goes back to his primitive state, and begins to hunt again. So you see the savage is not very far removed from the Scotch or English rich pro- prietors and lessees of grouse moors and deer forests. I fancy 1 have made a discovery. It is a new sport for yachtsmen and those who are fond of large game shooting ; moreover, the shooting-grounds are not very far from London. When at Peterhead, on the crab and lobster inquiry, my friend Captain David Gray, of the whaling ship ‘Eclipse,’ informed me that every year in the months of July and August, when the herrings appear off Peterhead, they are almost invariably followed by large Finner whales. These fellows are often seventy feet long, aye, even bigger than that sometimes, and they have hitherto been allowed to hunt the herrings with impunity. The fleet of herring vessels do not care to touch them, and they are not of sufficient value either for oil or whalebone to render it worth the while of the crews of the regular whalers to go in pursuit of them. I understand that these whales generally worry the herrings, not by rushing into the shoal, but by swimming round the edge and driving them together, just as a colley dog folds sheep. At Newcastle one of these Finner whales managed to roll himself up in a herring-net and get drowned; he came ashore near the mouth of the Tyne. In Captain Gray’s yard, where he boils the whale oil, 170 THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ I was fortunate enough to discover the mouth with the whalebone still om sitw of one of these big Finners. I have a little story to tell about this whale. Mr. Morris, of the Coastguard at North Berwick, about one hundred miles by coast from Peterhead, told me that a day or two previous to my visit there, a large whale had been picked up by some herring boats at sea, and towed ashore, where it was cut up and sold for oil. This whale had no head, and it was a great puzzle to the fishers to — know where the head could be. I rather astonished Morris when I told him that it was in Captain Gray’s yard at Peterhead. Captain Gray had informed me that fourteen days before my visit to Peterhead some herring fishers had found a whale floating dead at sea, had cut off his head, and let the body go adrift; the second lot of fishermen found it miles away. Now I really do not see why these rascally herring- poaching Finners should not afford excellent sport to yachtsmen and gentlemen who often go immense dis- tances to shoot big game. Peterhead is not far from — Aberdeen, the Scotch express runs up there in about eighteen hours. Gray thinks the best way would be to shoot the Finners with a whale harpoon-gun (a weapon like a stumpy duck-gun), from a steam yacht, or if pre- ferred, regular whale-boats might be towed by the yacht, the Finner harpooned, judiciously played on the whale- lines, and killed in the same way as the ordinary northern whale, which, by the way, does not require so much killing as the Finners. It must, however, be recollected that these Finners are bad to kill, as they will sometimes, when harpooned, turn about and fight THE CRUISE OF THE ‘ JACKAL.’ 171 the boats, using their tail with tremendous force. Here then there is an element of danger which no doubt would add zest to the sport of some of our friends. There are many sportsmen in England who have shot an elephant, but very few who have harpooned a whale; besides this, it is to be recollected that the killing of these whales would be a benefit to the herring-fishers, as it would keep the herrings from being worried, and prevent the nets being rolled up and carried off by Master Physalis boops, for that is his name—bodps because he has a little eye like an ox. For those who do not care to go out and kill a seventy- foot whale, I have yet another plan. At the meeting of the Yorkshire Salmon Fishery Board at York, the fishermen made a formal complaint of the great injury done to the salmon fisheries by the por- poises and grampuses coming up the Humber. These hunt the salmon so closely, that they leap out of the water and go out to sea again to get out of their way; the consequence is, the fishermen do not catch the salmon. The hungry Cetacea follow the salmon up the Humber as far as Goole. A discussion took place as to the best way to kill them, whether by net, harpoon, or explosive rifle balls ; finally, it was determined to offer rewards for their destruction, and the tariff of reward was settled at one shilling per foot, big and little. Some are herring-hogs, four feet long ; some are grampus, eighteen to twenty feet long. About July or August whale and porpoise shooting may begin; and to those who wish to have the novel sensa- ee THE CRUISE OF THE ‘JACKAL.’ tion of killing a whale, I expect it will be real good sport. The ladies, by the way, will be interested in this proposed whale-hunting expedition. I was told that good whalebone is worth from 8001. to 9001. per ton. The Finner whalebone is not valuable like that of the right whale, but still it is of some service. The whales, I think, will not thank me for writing the above lines. 173 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. JOHN-0'-GROAT’S house, the extreme north of Scotland, where I went in 1877 to obtain evidence from the crab and lobster fishermen, is a most interesting place. Not much seems to be known as to who the original John-o’-Groat was. I was, however, fortunate enough to come across an old fellow who was up to his ankles in water, cutting his crop of oats; his name was Jock-o-the-Burn. John-o-Groat must, I should imagine, have been just such another character. I learn from the Thurso handbook, ‘the tradi- tion is that John de Groat was a Dutchman, who, along with two brothers, obtained by royal charter of James IV. land in the parish of Canisbay. In process of time there eame to be eight different proprietors of the name of Groat. An annual festive gathering having been estab- lished to commemorate the anniversary of their arrival in Caithness, a dispute arose on one occasion among the Groats respecting the right of taking the door, the head of the table, &c.; and it is said that, in order to preserve harmony, old John built a house separate from all others, of an octagonal form, with eight doors and windows; and having placed a table of the same shape in the middle of the house, at the next anniversary he invited each of his friends to enter at his own door and sit at the head of the 174 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. table, and so all were satisfied. Such is said to be the origin of John-o’-Groat’s house. Another but more unlikely story is that the first Groat was a ferryman betwixt Caithness and Orkney, and that the fare across was fourpence or a groat for each pas- senger, and that the ferryman, whose name was John, got the sobriquet of Johnny Groat for this reason. There are many of the name of Groat in the county yet, and from local records they seem to have been a family of some con- sequence since the year 1496. Close by the sea-shore there is a tumble-down cottage, which will answer the purpose very well of the original house of ‘ John-o’-Groat.’ Near this house a substantial hotel has been erected. The Prince of Wales has visited it, and the inhabitants of this part of the world are very proud of this ultuma Thule having been inspected by Royalty. I must confess that the view from John-o’-Groat’s house is magni- ficent in the extreme. Immediately opposite is the island of Stroma; South Ronaldsha, and beyond that the other islands of the Orkneys can be seen more or less distinctly. To the eastward is Duncansby Head; although the sea was quite calm, the water off Duncansby was in a great state of agitation, and it appeared to me that a large tidal wave, like the tidal wave or bore on the Severn, was coming round the corner. This remarkable appearance was caused by two eddies or whirlpools, called the ‘ Bores of Dun- cansby.’ These bores are at their greatest height at the flood tide. Off St. John’s Head there is another set of bores ; these are called the ‘Merry Men of May;’ these awful waves appear with the ebb tide. The consequence is that this passage is dangerous to ships passing through NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. ria the strait, where the tide is said to run at the rate of ten miles an hour. Virgil’s description, in the third ‘ Atneid,’ of Scylla and Charybdis, exactly applies to John-o’-Groat’s house :— | Dextrum Scylla latus, levum implicata Charybdis Obsidet, atque imo barathri ter gurgite vastos Sorbet in abruptum fiuctus, rursusque sub auras Erigit alternos, et sidera verberat unda. ‘Seylla guards the right side, whirling Charybdis the left, and thrice with the deep eddies of its voracious gulf swallows up the vast billows in the abyss, and again spurts them out by turns high into the air, and lashes the stars with the waves.’ To the westward from John-o’-Groat’s is seen the Hoy Head, which is, I believe, one of the highest cliffs in Scotland. It is said to be 1,100 feet high. St. Paul’s is 404 feet high, consequently this fearful cliff is nearly three times higher than St. Paul’s. A story is told of an eagle’s nest having been discovered far down a cliff somewhere in this neighbourhood. The sum of a guinea each was offered for the eggs; an Orkney man, determined to gain the prize, made a rope of heather, fastened his wife to the end, and let her down no less than 240 feet from the top of the cliff to rob the eagle’s nest of the eggs. The rope was made of heather, as the clever wife suggested, if made of ordinary hemp it might chafe by the friction against the projections of the rock. The young woman performed this perilous feat of bird’s-nesting with success, and sold her eggs at the price offered. This adventurous pair are said to have 176 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. collected, with their heather rope, a dozen eagles’ eggs in one season. I was informed that sixty eagles had been killed in the island of Lewis in seven or eight years, and that there were about seventy breeding-places patronised more or less by eagles in Sutherlandshire, many of them inaccessible to human beings. Grouse-preservers do not like eagles, computing that an eagle kills one grouse every day. In the Orkneys peregrines breed, and a very nice specimen was sent me from near John-o’-Groat’s. The great Skua gull breeds in the northern Orkneys and Shetland. A gentleman living at Kirkwall informed me that a demoi- selle crane (of all birds in the world) was shot in the Orkneys ; he was, of course, most anxious to obtain the specimen, but was just too late to get it, as the man who had shot the bird had picked off its feathers and made it into soup. | I was also told a very funny story of the artful- ness of common chickens. In former days it was diffi- cult for visitors to get anything to eat at John-o-Groat’s, there being no butchers or bakers within miles. When visitors arrived it was the custom of the proprietor of the little inn to chase and catch a chicken, and pluck and roast him at once for the visitors’ dinner. In course of time the chickens became very artful. They kept a sharp look-out, and when they saw a carriage coming along the road— they could see a long way down the straight road from the inn—they bolted, as the French would have it, @ toutes jambes—with all legs—into the heather, and did not reappear until the visitors had eaten their bacon without the chicken and taken their departure. That birds learn NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. L7% from experience is quite certain; when the telegraph wires were first put up between Berrydale and Hemsdale, the grouse were continually flying against the wires and killing themselves, and in one season the driver of the mail-cart picked up no less than forty brace of grouse that had been so killed. Of late years not a grouse has been found killed by the telegraph wires. They seem to have passed on the warning that telegraph wires were dan- gerous. The sea-gulls at Wick are very tame ; indeed, there are hundreds of them in the harbour, and they are never allowed to be touched in any way. Apropos of sea-gulls,a very pretty sight can now daily be seen at Southport, in Lancashire. The gatekeeper of the long pier advertises that the sea-gulls will be fed daily at twelve o'clock. Their feeding-time at my visit had long passed, but nevertheless there were hundreds of gulls floating gracefully on the water at the end of the pier. The young woman at the refreshment-room close by, sells bags of biscuits to feed the sea-gulls. It was most interesting to watch the actions of these pretty birds when the food was thrown into the water; a great scramble at once took place for it. I threw in a whole biscuit; a gull flew away with it, with some six or eight after him, and a battle ensued. In half an hour or so many hundred gulls had assembled. This is the prettiest sight I have seen for a long time. A friend of mine residing at Thurso, complains bitterly of the effects of the Sea-Bird Preservation Act: he says that the gulls, especially the black-backed gull, do an enormous amount of mischief to the salmon N * 178 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. fisheries. These fellows watch the shallows, and eat the smolts; he has taken no less than five smolts from one gull: in his opinion there are no salmon poachers in the world so bad as sea-gulls; they practically destroy more human food in the form of salmon than all the other salmon poachers in Scotland. The sea-gulls will also eat oats. They spit up the husks of these seeds in balls like owls’ pellets; they also destroy the turnips, inasmuch as they bore holes in them; the water gets in, and the frost following, kills the turnips. The gulls have been known to destroy in a six-acre field as many turnips as would feed three cows. I understand that hares prefer swedes to turnips, and that it is not a bad plan to plant swedes to induce hares to leave the turnips alone: this is on the same principle that the butler advises his master to put strong ale in the cellar if he wishes to stop the table-beer from evaporating. I noted several other matters during my journey of inquiry in Scotland which I should like to record. The first thing that struck me was that everybody in Scotland seems to be educated. At about nine in the morning, at every place, both town and village, the children may be seen ‘away to school,’ and they seem rather to enjoy the prospect of learning lessons—quite a contrast to the state of things in England some sixty years ago, when the late Bishop Shuttleworth began his cele- brated verses on the ‘ Progress of a Clergyman’ thus :— The fatal morn arrives, and oh! To school the weeping lad must go. The lad, however, goes to school, is ultimately rewarded, NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. 179 becomes a college tutor, and winds up with the aspira- tion— Oh, make me a bishop, or ai least a dean ! Dr. Shuttleworth prophesied his own fortune; he became Warden of New College, and then Bishop of Chichester. But all Scotch lads cannot become bishops or deans. Backed, however, by education, they mostly get promoted —as old Dean Gaisford once thundered out at the undergraduates of Christ Church, Oxford, in his celebrated sermon on learning—to ‘ positions in life to which con~ siderable emoluments are attached.’ Education also accounts for the answer of an individual to the King, who asked what he should do for him for services performed. His answer was, ‘ Please, your Majesty, make me a Scotchman.’ Of an evening, in that charming city of Edinburgh, can be seen at the corner near the post office— A little crowd, That bawls so loud, It really runs quite through ye ; It’s all the charity girls and boys A-singing Alle-luia. These little wretches are not, however, singing a hymn of praise, but are bawling out the halfpenny evening | papers. Very few, if any, of these urchins wear shoes or stockings; but the sole of the foot gets harder the more you use it, and there are no shoemakers’ bills to pay. They are mostly scantily clothed, but seem well fed and happy. I understand none of these urchins are allowed to nN 2 180 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. appear with the papers under their arms for sale unless they have been to school in the morning. I saw a little incident that would make a capital pic- ture for an artist. In one of the jewellers’ shops in Princes Street there was a magnificent tiara, with bracelets, earrings, &c., of lustrous diamond brilliants. Two little mites of children were racing to sell their halfpenny papers, when all in a moment the glitter of the diamonds struck them ; they pulled up short, and stood aghast at the objects to which they were so little accustomed, gazing at them with all eyes and great wonderment. Here is a picture, ‘ Poverty and Riches.’ I was fortunate enough to be at the railway station when the train arrived with a number of fishwives from Newhaven. They were all dressed in blue serviceable serge; some were young, some old. They all had their creels or baskets of fish with them. I observed that it required two, and sometimes three railway porters to lift these heavy creels on to the women’s backs. The creels are so made that the weight rests along the length of the spine, and is balanced, as it were, by a band that crosses the forehead. The distance these women will walk, and the weight they will carry, are astounding. I was told of an old fishwife, living at Dunbar, who every morning sets out on a journey of from six to nine miles round the country to sell her fish, carrying sometimes as much as one hun- dredweight on her back. So accustomed is this fine old lady to carry weights on her back, that when, having sold her fish, she is returning homewards, she picks up heavy stones from the road-side, and puts them into her creel ; NOTES FROM SCOTLAND, 18l finding, I suppose, that a weighted creel is easier to carry than an empty one. In the evening the fishwives come into the streets, and putting down their creels cry, ‘ Caller O! Caller O!’ which, being translated, means ‘Fresh oysters.’ I inter- viewed one of these oyster ladies, a charming old woman. She complained bitterly of the price of oysters, and the diffi- culty she experienced, as a widow, in keeping her bairns in clothes and food. So you see the much-mooted oyster question affects not only the London clubhouses and the rich, but also the extremely poor. There is a famous song put into the mouths of these poor ‘ Caller O’ women :— Wha will buy my caller herring ? They’re no brought here without brave daring. Some call them lives of men. Wha will buy my caller herring, Fresh drawn frae the Forth ? I have received, through the kindness of an Edinburgh lady, a very pretty song, called ‘The Oyster Girl.’ I would advise my young lady readers (if any) to get this song. The melody is very pretty, and the chorus, ¢ Caller O!’ sweet and far-sounding, like the Swiss jodel songs with which the shepherd girls on the Alps awake the echoes to call their cows home. By association with the fisher-people I have, I think, found out the meaning of that very common expression in Scotland, ‘They call him.’ If you ask a peasant in Scot- land, ‘ Who is that ?’ the answer is sure to be, ‘ They call him’ So-and-so. Now, the fisher-people intermarry among themselves. The consequence is that the same surnames in a village get very much multiplied. Hence the origin 182 NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. of the term ‘Tee names,’ such as ‘Jock of the Burn,’ ‘Sandy,’ &e., in cases where almost everybody bears the name, say for example, of ‘ Buchan.’ Among the Scotch, there is, I find, often a vein “sf the comic. I asked a boy at a railway station, ‘ When will the train start?’ ‘She'll just start when ye are all ready,’ was the quick answer. A gentleman living near Peter- head one morning ordered his machine (by the way, why are all possible kinds of carriages in Scotland called ma- chines?) at ten. He kept his old servant out in the wet holding the horse till twelve. On coming out two hours after his time he said, ‘ John, I fear I have kept you wait- ing.’ John simply touched his hat, and grinning broadly replied, ‘ I'll no contradict ye, sir.’ One of the most interesting facts I came across in Scotland was the remains of fire-worship at Burghhead, near Forres. A very ancient rite is there still carried on, called the clavie. On the last day of the old year, old style, which falls on January 12, a large tar-barrel is set on fire, and carried by one of the fishermen round the town, while the assembled folks shout and holloa. If the man who carries the barrel falls, it is an omen of misfor- tune to him or his family. The circuit of the town having been made by the man with the burning barrel, it is placed on a large stone on the very top of the neighbour- ~ ing cliff, and more fuel is added. The sparks, as they fly upwards, are supposed to be witches and evil spirits leaving the town, the populace hoot and _ execrate them accordingly. The fire-barrelis then placed on an ancient Roman altar to finish its burning out; this altar is called the douro. As the barrel falls in pieces the Pe ee ae ee ee eS ee ‘ = * 40s | NOTES FROM SCOTLAND. 183 fisher-wives rush in, and endeavour to get a lighted bit of the wood; with this light the fire on the hearth of the cottage is at once kindled, and it is, I understand, lucky to keep this same fire going all the year round. _ Bits of the charcoal of the clavie fire-barrel are also col- lected and suspended in the chimney, to keep away witches and evil spirits. It appears to me that this curious ceremony of the clavie and the douro are the remains of fire-worship. | I examined the douro, and also a curious Roman well, and some rude ancient Roman sculpture in the harbour- master’s office, built into a wall near the douro. I am informed that up to a very recent date, the carrying of a tar-barrel was also a regular custom with the lads of Stromness on Christmas and New Year’s Eves; and when the tar in the barrel got spent, the barrel was carried to Brinkie’s Brae, and there burnt. Sometimes a boat with tar on fire in a pot inside of it was substituted for the barrel, and drawn through the streets by many willing hands, who sang sea songs as they passed along. 184 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. I visIrED Great Yarmouth in October 1875, to procure some particulars for my official report on ‘The Fisheries of Norfolk.2!_ When I had been there in June the sea was almost as calm as a sheet of glass, and little wave- lets gently washed upon the beach, the sands of which were quite hot to the touch. The visitors were basking on the shingle, or being photo’d by the photographer on the beach, and the pleasure-boats were merrily dancing about Vela dabant leti et spumas salis wre vuebant. On looking out of the window of the Royal Hotel on this October morning I found the weather entirely changed from what it wasin June. An autumnal gale, which had for some days been threatening, had come into port from the north-east. The great ‘ white horses ’ came rolling in from over the Scroby and other sandbanks outside, and reaching the shallow gracefully curled them- selves over, and then suddenly broke up with an awful thud. They then formed themselves into light squadrons of air-bubbles innumerable, which rushed up the beach with a Balaclava-like charge, rattling the pebbles and shingle, and making a terrible din as the waves hurled them ashore, or swept them violently seawards. The 1 The Norfolk Fisheries Act, now in operation, was founded on this report. NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 185 _ thought struck me that this boiling of the great waters was a happy provision of the Creator to aérate His ocean, for— The sea is His, and He made it. If the sea were allowed to remain stagnant several days together, the water would become decomposed, lose its oxy- gen, and be unfit for the sustenance of fish and the myriad forms of animal life, ‘the things creeping innumerable,’ which inhabit its vast waters. Storms, therefore, though often terribly injurious to human life and property, are necessary in the economy of the universe. Without them we know not what catastrophe might happen in the ocean world. It might even be ‘all up’ with the herrings. As I came out of the hotel the wind came round the corner with such violence that it was positively difficult to progress. Dense sand-clouds came dashing in from the shore with terrific violence, and in many places sand covered the roadway so thickly that the carriages had to go slowly through these newly formed obstructions. However, we went out to the end of the pier, and it was very beautiful to see the huge waves roll in with their white-crested foam, and charge the piles of the pier till the whole structure shivered again. I immediately thought of Virgil’s deseription of a storm which caught poor old Afneas, after he and his army (like the Russians at the Crimea) had got a hiding at Troy. What a fool he was to let that wooden horse, filled with his enemies, Greek soldiers, into the city! /Emneas could not have been a good observer, especially of horses. 186 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. And first of all, ladies and gentlemen, you must know that in olden times lived, and may be even now living at the bottom of the sea (especially in the North Sea opposite Yarmouth), King Neptune, the lord of the sea. The following beautiful description of the king’s submarine palace and horses has been recorded by friend Homer. I give the translation in English, as the Greek may be a httle difficult to some of my readers :— ‘Presently King Neptune descended from the rugged mountain, rapidly advancing on foot, and the high hills and woods trembled at Neptune’s tread. Thrice, indeed, he strode forward, and with the fourth stride reached Ege (i.e, Yarmouth), the place he sought. There lofty mansions, resplendent with gold, ever incorruptible, are erected for him in the depth of the sea. There he yoked to his chariot the brazen-footed horses swiftly flying with golden manes, but himself he clad in gold, took his golden lash, beautifully fabricated, and mounted the chariot. He drove over the billows ; the whales, ex- ulting around him, rose on all sides from their recesses to hail their king. The seas stood asunder for joy, and the chariot flew very rapidly, nor was the brazen axle wetted beneath; so his horses bounding on bore him to the ships of the Greeks’ (%.e., the Yarmouth and Gorleston fleet of herring-smacks). ‘There is an ample cave in the abysses of the deep sea between Tenedos and the rugged Imbrus’ (%.e., out in the ‘Silver pits’ between Norway and Scotland, where the soles live, so well known to the Yarmouth trawlers). ‘There Neptune, the shaker of the earth, stopped his horses, and loosing them from the chariot, cast beside NOTES FROM YARMOUTH, 187 them ambrosial fodder to eat, and round their feet he threw golden chains invincible, insoluble, that there they might wait their king’s return.’ Virgil takes up this idea very beautifully. The cave where Neptune pulled up his four-in-hand is the cave of Kolus, the king of the winds :— Hic vasto rex AXolus antro Luctantes ventos tempestatesque sonoras Imperio premit ac vinclis et carcere frenat. Illi indignantes magno cum murmure montis Circum claustra fremunt. Celsa sedet Afolus arce Sceptra tenens, mollitque animos et temperat iras. ‘Here in a vast cave King Molus controls, with im- perial sway, the turbulent winds and blustering tempests, and confines them with chains in their prison. They chafe indignant with loud roar around their mountain barriers. AZolus, seated on a lofty throne, wields his sceptre, and therewith calms their fury and moderates their rage.’ | It appears that Madame Jupiter, that is, Juno (she must have been a disagreeable mawther'), had a spite against poor Aineas for some reason or other, so she went to AKolus, and, woman-like, humbugged him with the promise of a bride, one Miss ‘ Deiopcea’ (rather a nice girl, I should think, from hername). Juno then persuaded /Eolus to let his pack of winds out of their kennel, and so turn all Afneas’s fleet into ‘ Vanguards,’ and send them to the ‘bottom of the deep blue sea.’ The following is the description of King Aolus starting his winds for the race across the ocean :— 1 Yarmouth for ‘ young woman.’ 188 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. Hee ubi dicta cavum conversa cuspide montem Impulit in latus ; ac venti velut agmine facto Qua data porta, ruunt et terras turbine perflant. Incubuere mari totumque a sedibus imis Una Eurusque Notusque ruunt, creberque procellis Africus et vastos volvunt ad litora fluctus. Insequitur clamorque virum stridorque rudentum. ‘Thus having said, whirling the point of his spear, he struck the hollow mountain’s side; the winds, as in a- formed battalion, rush forth at every vent, and scour over the lands in giddy whirls. They ply the ocean furiously, and at once, the east and south and stormy south-west winds plough up the whole deep from its lowest bottom, and roll vast billows to the shores. The cries of the sea- men succeed, and the cracking of the cordage.’ Well, then in came olus’ mighty winds to have a turn at the good people of Yarmouth, and a very beauti- ful sight it was. Presently a big steamer appeared in the offing, and up went a flag on the staff opposite the Sailors’ Home, and in an amazingly short time the sharp-eyed signalman made out her flag with the tele- scope. Her letters were W. D. R.; the books showed that she was the ‘Bradspeth.’ In a few minutes more it was known in London that the ‘ Bradspeth’ was passing Yarmouth. The telegraph, close to the beach, is doing wonders for the trade of Yarmouth. Every ship as she passes Yarmouth shows her number by means of flags. By referring to the book in the signal-house it can be immediately seen who she is, and the news appears in the shipping papers the next morning. Among the noticeable features of Yarmouth are the “look-outs.’ These are scaffolds, with a platform on the NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 189 top, from which the men on duty can see an immense dis- tance out to sea. When we were standing on the pier I saw a crowd begin to collect on the shore at some little dis- tance. Of course, I ran to see what was the matter, and was shocked to see, just washed ashore, a poor lad who had been drowned when bathing a few days back. I was so sorry for the poor lad, and thought of his father and mother when they heard the news. A bystander told me that no less than twenty-three poor sailors were once washed ashore by one tide from a wreck outside. Many shipwrecks occur every winter. The lifeboat bell clanging loudly in the midst of a gale of wind in the dead of a winter’s night, to signal the ‘turn-out’ to the beachmen from their slumbers, is a sound which if once heard will never be forgotten. I should like some musi- cian to write a song, ‘Hark! ’tis the Lifeboat Bell.’ From October to May the big lifeboat is kept on the beach close to the water, to be ready at a moment’s notice ; the rest of the year it lives in its stable. Ifthe boat is launched for saving life in reply to signals of distress at sea during the night-time, a certain fee is always payable. If the boat is launched in the day, half the amount is claimed. The smaller ‘surf-boat,’ as it is called, also re- ceives regular fees for launching to save life. The sands near Yarmouth are terribly dangerous. Year after year, more especially during the time of the equinoctial gales, very disastrous shipwrecks take place; indeed, it is estimated that of the wrecks in each year off the coast of Great Britain, more than half occur off the eastern coast. There are various sands which protect the Roads: Scroby hes opposite the town, 190 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. * and is the principal one in extent; the others are N ewarp, Cockle, Barber Corton, Newcomb, and Holm Sands. The entrances to the Roads are by gatways, the principal of which are St. Nicholas’ and Hewitt’s. From the Britannia Pier we could see some vessels at anchor, rolling and pitching about in a most fearful manner; so much did they roll that it was easy to see down their cabin stairs, and the wonder was thet oo men were not washed out of them. Fogs are very nasty things in the North Sea. When going through Yarmouth Harbour I heard a most dismal sound ; this noise was our friend Captain Emerson, of the Trinity Board, making hideous diapasons with his new patent steam fog-horn. I must not omit to mention that excellent institution, the Sailors’ Home, on the beach. In this admirable in- stitution there is every possible convenience for the care of shipwrecked sailors. A most excellent place it is, and well worthy the support of visitors and the public in general. During the past year no less than 138 ship- wrecked sailors were relieved, making the total number received since its establishment 3,986. In the yard of the Custom House I examined a capital — mermaid on duty at the foot of the signal post. She is life-size, and represents a really very pretty woman; the fish’s tail is capitally made. This mermaid answers exactly to Horace’s description,— Desinit in piscem mulier formosa superne. One of the most curious features in Yarmouth is its ‘Rows,’ and in this respect it resembles no other town in NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 191 England. The ‘Rows’ are straight, long, and narrow, with houses on either side; the residents*have been known to shake hands from opposite windows. They are paved with large pebbles from the beach. I understand that these Rows were invented by the fishermen who were the first inhabitants of Yarmouth; they used to hang their herring nets in long rows on the beach. After a time they built the huts alongside the beach; the houses in time took the places of the huts; this, then, was the origin of the Yarmouth Rows. It was necessary, of course, that some provision should be made to get heavy goods down to the houses in the Rows. In Yarmouth, therefore, there exists a kind of cart which, I believe,is unique. ‘Two long and strong timbers form the shafts for the horse. Immediately behind the horse’s tail boards are inserted between the shafts, and then comes a platform somewhat in the shape of an easy chair, the seat sloping, and without arms. The whole of this rude, but yet very convenient kind of vehicle, is sup- ported by two wheels cut out of solid wood, and joined together by a wooden axle, which run inside as in a rail- way carriage. Wheels of this kind are of very ancient origin, and if I recollect right the war chariot of the ancient Romans ran upon solid wheels just like these Yarmouth carts, which are called trolls. The fact is, it is a very difficult thing indeed to make a wheel or a barrel. The only thing that beat Robinson Crusoe was the manu- facture of a cask, and I dare say there are very few of my readers who know how to make a watertight cask. When the trawlers come in laden with fish they trans- fer them to very large boats rowed by several men, and 192 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. thence into trolls, which are backed into the water. These boat are very strong, and admirably fitted to fight the surf, which sometimes breaks with terrific foree. The — poor horses must suffer much in drawing the heavy-laden trolls through the deep shingle; surely, for humanity’s sake, a platform or tramway of some kind might be de- vised and put into operation. The Church of St. Nicholas at Yarmouth is most inter- — esting. The organ is said to be inferior only in power to the celebrated organ at Haarlem. When completed it will be one of the best, if not the best, in England. Over this venerable organ is a gilt figure of a bishop, with mitre and crosier. To this venerable wooden prelate I took a great fancy. This Yarmouth bishop is very like in face to our founder of Winchester College and New College, Oxford, William of Wykeham. When visiting this beautiful church at Yarmouth, the visitor cannot fail to be struck with the numerous records of officers and men of merchant and other ships who have been drowned in the great North Sea, itself not so very far from the walls of St. Nicholas. Behind the door of the church, at the west end, is an enormous bone, which looks exactly like a huge arm-chair. The parishioners of Yarmouth do not seem to know much about this bone; and at first it gave me some little trouble to find out what it really was. Ultimately I made out quite suddenly that it is part of the skull—the occipital bone and part of the parietal—of a large sperm whale, pro- bably washed ashore near Yarmouth, and converted into a relic for the church. The vicar, the Rev. Mr. Venables, could not tell me what it was, but I have cut up the skull al Se NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 193 of a common porpoise to represent this balzenarian chair in St. Nicholas’s Church, and prove that my diagnosis of its nature is correct ! Yarmouth is a very healthy place, and I advise any who do not know whither to go fora holiday to patro- 1 The following note is from Lubbock’s Fauna of Norfolk, 2nd ed., p. 16 :-— ‘No recent occurrence of the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus Linn.) on the Norfolk coast is on record, but Sir Thomas Browne says, «“ A spermaceti whale sixty-two feet long [came on shore] near Wales [about 1646]; another of the same kind twenty years before [June 1626 | at Hunstanton ; and not far off eight or nine came ashore, and two had young ones after they were forsaken by the water ” (Wilkin’s edit. iv. p.326). In December 1626, according to Booth’s History of Norfolk (ix. p. 33), a great whale, fifty-seven feet in length—from his excellent descrip- tion evidently a male sperm whale—was cast on shore at Holme-next-the- Sea; and lastly, Mr. Arthur Bacon, of Yarmouth, writes to Sir Thomas Browne, on May 10, 1652, of the sperm whale cast on shore there (i. p. 369). In St. Nicholas’ Church, Great Yarmouth, is the basal portion of the skull of a whale of this species. It is placed near the door at the west end of the church, and used asa chair. Mr. C. J. Palmer, of Yarmouth, informs me that in the churchwardens’ accounts for 1606 there is a charge of eight shillings for painting this skull, which fully establishes its great antiquity. The full-grown males of the sperm whales are said to be generally solitary in their habits, except when migrating from one place to another; and it seems probable that the majority of those which occur singly on the British shores are these solitary males, which have wandered from their true habitat, the warm sea sof the tropics. But when they visit usin numbers, as mentioned by Sir Thomas Browne, they are most likely adult females, or young males, which associate in separate herds.’ These wandering parties would, as a matter of course, be more fre- quent when the species was more numerous, and when once entangled in the shallows of the German Ocean, want of sea room and of suitable nourishment would soon bring about their destruction. The statement by Swinden (p. 885, edition published 1772) is as follows :—‘ Near this door, under a niche, stands a large old jaw-bone of a whale. It formerly was used for a seat at the church grate (gate ?) under the old Guildhall.’ Comparative anatomy was not understood then as it now is, or this would not have been mistaken for a jaw-bone. It is the portion of the skull upon which the lower part of the brain rests, 10) 194 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. nise Yarmouth. So healthy is this interesting seaport, that I understand from my friend Dr. N orman that the gravedigger some time since became insolvent through want of professional occupation. When brought up be- fore the County Court he attributed his insolvency to better drainage of the town, and the supply of water from Ormsby Broad, but more especially to the scarcity of doctors as compared with former times, when he first entered upon his professional duties. ‘ Gentlemen,’ said he, ‘a poor fellow then had some chance of a living ; now I have only buried twelve and a half the last fortnight, so I leave you to guess how I have to get a bit of bread in these here hard times.’ The trawlers of the North Sea have, above all men, opportunities of finding out much that is going on in the subaqueous treasure-houses of the ocean. This ocean is not only the habitation of myriads of living creatures, but is also a cemetery containing the bones of creatures that lived in past ages. Amongst the treasures of the deep often brought up by trawlers or their nets, the bones of elephants frequently occur. In the museum of the Sailors’ Home at Yarmouth. there is a’ very interesting collection of the bones of elephants, dredged up between the English coast and Heligoland, off the mouth of the Elbe. At no very ancient geological period England was cer- tainly united with France, and it is supposed by some that the Thames did not at that time flow into the sea at the place where it now does, but that the river broke through the ridge of chalk, somewhere to the northof Reading, and - emptied itself into the ocean in the estuary of the Humber. NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 195 At the same time it is the opinion of some that a mighty river larger than the Rhine drained the European con- tinent. | These two rivers probably brought down into the sea the bodies of dead elephants. This, I believe, is the ~ usual explanation of their bones being found in the North Sea: but elephants’ bones are found abundantly in other parts of England, at Woolwich, Sheppey, the London gravel beds, Oxfordshire, Abingdon, Arundel, and many other places. It may be that the North Sea now eovers tracts once shaded by forests, the home of these huge beasts. Yarmouth, as we all know so well, is one of the chief fishery ports in England. There are 400 to 500 smacks marked Y. H. registered at this port, and besides these a fleet of Scotch and other boats come here every autumn for the herring fishing; the value of the fish landed each year at Yarmouth is very great—but I am not writing a fishery book, so must not be tempted into details. Not only does the sea at Yarmouth yield fish, but also even, sometimes, ready-made money, for when looking over the Britannia Pier, during the yale, I noticed many men and boys anxiously waiting the coming in of the big waves. Every now and then one of them would rush into the boiling wash and snatch up something out of the shingle. I ascertained that these people were looking for money, which was being washed out from the shingle com- posing the beach. One man got as many as six sovereigns the day I was there, others smaller sums; the theory is that visitors drop the money out of their pockets when lying on the shingle. Nearly every year coins are found on Yarmouth beach. 0 2 196 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. From sixteen to twenty sovereigns were found lately near the pier; they were all of modern date. This is a matter worthy of further investigation. I don’t think the theory of visitors dropping their sovereigns will quite do. I also heard a new theory why the weather was so bad at one time. An old salt was smoking his clay and looking out discontentedly seawards. On being asked the cause of the bad weather the old man gave the following account :— ‘Yesee,’ he says, ‘it’s all along of the san; the sun, he have a shiny side and he have a dark side, and now he turns his dark side to Yarmouth. I have a friend in the town they call a hastronomer as pilots the stars, and he says the old sun got foul of the comet, he got jammed up in the meshes of this ’ere comet’s tail. Then directly after there come a heclipse, and the sun, he has never been hisself not never since ; heain’t well, and can’t do his waark [work] not nohow.’ Amongst the many charitable institutions which Yarmouth boasts is the Fishermen’s Hospital, a quad- rangular building near St. Nicholas’ Church. It was built by the Corporation in 1702 at a cost of 621/. Since its erection various sums have been bequeathed; these now produce 492. 10s. per annum. Seeing some poor old weather-beaten men basking in the sun, I thought I would see what evidence they could give me about the herring fishery when they were young. I was fortunate enough to obtain evidence from Mr. Silvers, aged 85, and from Mr. Colby, aged 71, who had both served nearly all their lives as man and boy in the North Sea. Tbe answer from both these veterans was, that there are NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 197 as many if not more herrings caught now than 70 or 80 years ago, and this in spite of the increased number of boats and nets. I was very much struck with the manners and appearance of old Mr. Silvers; in spite of his age, hale, hearty, and contented, with a regular fisherman’s eye, which no one accustomed to deep-sea fishermen can mis- take. He told me some of his history which was as follows :— ‘T was born in 1790, and have been a sailor and fisher- man from a sprat to a whale ail my life. When I was about thirteen years old I was ’prenticed to a cooper, and after being with him some time, he sent me out for a short voyage in a vessel he freighted, as I was a strong lad. When I came back I went on larning my trade till I was just seventeen. One cold winter's night in the year 1806 —Trafalgar was fought Oct. 21, 1805—I was a-standing in a public-house in Yarmouth, called the “‘ Horse and Gig,” with two other boys; a blind fiddler who was there was just a-going to tune up for us, when in rushed the press- gang and took the lot of us. We was took off in boats to a man-of-war lying in Yarmouth Roads, and kept aboard all night, and brought before the officers in the morning. Those who had a protection were never kept, as there was a law against it. A protection is this:—‘If you was bound a ’prentice in those days to any trade, that pro-. tected you from being taken ; for you was obliged to serve your time till the seven years indenters was out. ‘That fiddler, he was let off at once, as, being blind, of course he was no use; and my master, he come aboard in the morning, thinking he could get me off as being a ’pren- tice, but he happened to say I had been to sea in his 198 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. vessel, so the officers said that was enough, and I could not — now be protected. I had six hours to go ashore and bid my father and mother good-bye, and then I had to go to my ship and serve in the King’s service. ‘I was away six years from old Yarmouth. A lot of us © was taken prisoner by the Danes; we were marched three hundred miles through their country to the prison, where I was thirteen months, almost starved I was. After being there all that time, I was let go; the English admiral gave up two Danish prisoners for one Englishman. Then I joined my ship and soon came home. After that I went away with Admiral Young in the Victoria. One day when I was a-walking on the deck I see a gentleman a beckoning of me, so I went up to him, and it was my old master, Captain Hutchinson, who had a schooner of eighteen guns called the “ Pigmy.” He said to me, “ Why, Silvers, how ever came you here?” So I told him what I had been doing; and he says, “ Well, would you like to come with me, or stay where you are?” In course I said, “ Well, sir, | would rather be with you than any one.” So he man- aged with the admiral, and on I goes aboard the schooner. We started for Gibraltar, and left there during the ’Meri- can war, landing at Plymouth with the Government mails. | ‘Well, I runned away that very day, and I went to Exeter, from there to London, and then on to Yarmouth ; but when I got here I was as bad off as ever, for the pressgang was out, and I daren’t stop, or they’d have nabbed me sure ercugh. So off I goes to Hull, and from there I goes a fishing to Greenland for three years after whales and ile. I know’d the pressgang couldn’t catch NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 199 me there anyhow. When I returned from Hull again the ’Merican war was over, and peace proclaimed, so I had to remain in Yarmouth; and then I went out in fishing- _ boats for owners, after herring. I have helped kill many a whale. We used to get half-a-guinea a fish, and 50s. per week. It will take the Arctic Expedition all their time to get to the North Pole, and when they get there there is nothing but ice and rocks. I never was higher than 72° myself. But them press days was terrible, that they was. Why, they once took our Mayor of Yarmouth (he was a rum-looking old chap), when he was a standing on the jetty. They didn’t care. One time a whole lot of carpenters went together, and when the gang came ashore the carpenters took and chopped the boats all to bits. In course, they was took up, and sent to Norwich Castle. When they was tried in London they was sentenced to twelve months’ imprisonment in the castle, and one of the poor fellows died there.’ Mr. Silvers showed me how he made tea, an ounce of which lasted him a week in a general way. ‘ Gentlefolks do not taste half the goodness of tea,’ he said; ‘ they don’t boil it enough. Why, the tea-leaves that gentle- men’s floors are swept with would make rare, beautiful tea for me.’ Half a crown a week this old man lives on; and he proudly said he did ‘ everything for himself, except once in three weeks, when he gave a woman threepence to “ lap up the water ” off the floor, while he scrubbed it with a brush on the end of a pole.’ . You see,’ he added, ‘I can’t go on my knees now, I haven’t been active for twelve years, for I got a shot in the leg when I was in the sarvice, and as I grew older I 200 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. felt it the more. The only thing I wish for is to have some one come and see me sometimes. I haven’t a rela- tion in the world; but I don’t wish to complain. I sit here and read when I have anything, and a book that a kind lady sent me I have read over and over again. When I can’t do that I sit and think over old times, as I do when I am restless 0’ nights. Please God, come next — 4th of August I shall be eighty-five, and a good deal have happened in that time to think over.’ After leaving my old friend, I could not help thinking of the old saying, ‘Not one half of the world knows how the other half live. This poor old man in his lonely home, with but comparatively few comforts, is far mo contented than hundreds with every luxury. Not % murmur does he utter, and not a wish to be better off, but with his cheerful disposition and good heart sees, or endeavours to see, ‘in each dark cloud a silver lining.’ Those who wish to have a real treat would do well to take my advice and go ‘by Great Eastern Railway to Yarmouth to inspect the herring harvest, which begins at that port in the month of September. For some days an increased number of tug steamers and smacks may be noticed either coming in or going out of Gorleston Harbour. These are the drifters bringing in their fish from the great North Sea. These powerful tugs tow the herring-boats alongside the Yarmouth fish quay, and of all sights in England this quay is at this season one of the most wonderful. The quay is admirably built for the purposes it is intended to fulfil. The merchants’ offices are all on one side, faced by a solid stone pavement, with a road only intervening be- “ . a ~ A 4 = ee ge, ee a) ee a ee a NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 201 tween them and the Suez Canal, as I call that portion of the Yare which flows past the town, and in which the herring-smacks are brought alongside. The market begins every morning in the season at ten o’clock. Large bodies of men, as strong as lions, are em- ployed in unloading the smacks. As the herrings are caught at sea they are put down into the hold and mixed with salt; arriving at the quay, they are sent up in bulk on to the deck, and are there counted. The counter takes two herrings in each hand and very quickly puts them into the basket. The men get three shillings a last for ‘ telling —that is, counting the her- rings. Four herrings are called a ‘warp.’ From the basket the herrings are emptied out into large baskets called ‘ swills.’ Each swill contains 500 herrings of long tale—that is, 132 for 100—a very ancient measurement. A last of herrings contains 13,200 fish. I found the pavement of the fish-quay almost covered with these swills full of herrings, and it seemed wonderful to me how ever they were going to be disposed of. Presently a man comes along with a bell, and the fish- buyers turn out to the place where the sale is going to take place. The auctioneer takes his seat with each foot ona swill, a red note-book and pencil in hand. He begins at once, with his loud, cheery voice, ‘ What shall I say for this lot?’ J see no sign and hear no bid! Somebody has made a bid, for he begins most rapidly, ‘ Eleven—eleven— eleven—eleven ; ten—ten—ten—ten—ten; eleven fif- teen—thank you; look at ’em again—a splendid lot of fish—don’t lose the lot for a crown; twelve—twelve— twelve—at last twelve fifteen.’ The little pencil hits the 202 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. book, and the lot is sold—to whom, it is impossible for me to say. The purchasers stand round in perfect silence, but though pretty quick in the eye I cannot see their bids. A movement of the eye, a slight turn of the head, or other mysterious sign incomprehensible to the public, is quite enough for the auctioneer to take the bid. — No sooner is one lot sold than he puts up another. I give him a nudge, pretend to wind him up (on his great broad back) like a clock with a key, and he puts on the. steam in reality then; and the wonderful way and clever chaff with which he leads on his bidders to buy is most amusing, putting the famous auctioneer of our ancestors, Robins, quite in the shade. The prices vary according to — the quality of the herrings and demand in the market. One lot was knocked down at 16/. 15s. for twenty swills. The fish first out of the hold are the most valuable ; those last out do not fetch so much money, as they are salter. The herrings on sale were North Sea herrings, very large fine fish. I examined the milts and roes, and found they were not quite in spawning condition, but very nearly so. A shoal was just then reported a few points west’ by north-west, direct from Yarmouth, near the Doggerbank. The result of my earnest consultations at Yarmouth enables me to classify the herrings somewhat as follows : Spring herrings, long-shore herrings, midsummer her- rings, and deep-sea herrings, the latter of two kinds. But this is such an intricate question, I cannot go into it here. The process of curing is as follows: the swills full of NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 203 herrings are brought to the curing-house and turned out on the floor; the men then mix them about with shovels, while another man scatters salt plentifully over them. The herrings are then placed in a heap and allowed to remain a certain time, then washed in a huge tub, then spitted (a process called ‘riving’). Spits are sticks per- fectly round. The stick is passed through one gill; and each spit, which carries twenty-five herrings when full, is hung up on what is called a ‘horse’ fora time. The fish are hung up in such a way that they can all be stripped off very quickly. The smoking-house consists of a large room; upon looking up to the ceiling may be seen a great number of racks, called ‘grills;’ the space between the racks is just the length of the spits. A man climbs up to the very top of these racks, another places himself halfway down, another man is on the floor, and the spits with the herrings are passed from one man to the other, and immediately hung up until the place is qnite full of herrings suspended by their gills. Fires of oak and cak sawdust are then lighted on the floor below. The oak is - chop-and-lop from the forests, and is sold by the cast; each bit of wood has a peculiar marking on it. Here, again, we have a strange measurement: in the sale of wood 1,000 stands for 600. The red herrings are smoked six or seven weeks, to give them a good deep red colour. During this process some fall off the spits; these are ealled ‘plucks’ and ‘tenders,’ and are collected and hung up again by the tail on what are called ‘tenter baulks.’ Real Yarmouth bloaters are herrings very slightly salted, and smoked for three or four hours only. In this 204 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. quickly taken off their spits and packed into barrels; a small barrel contains 200, a large barrel 660. They are packed with their heads outermost, and in order to save room they are occasionally pressed under a heavy iron screw, somewhat resembling the apparatus for making cheese. The herrings cured at Yarmouth in this way are mostly sent to the Mediterranean by fast steamers. The question of salt is of great importance. That which I saw was very hard, and in beautiful crystals resembling snow. This salt came from Nantwich, in Cheshire, and is brought to Yarmouth in steamers. — After inspecting the curing-houses we calculated how ~ many industries must be put into action before the barrelled process they puff up somewhat, hence they are called ‘bloaters.’ When the fish are quite prepared, they are herrings leave Yarmouth. Thus: 1, boats and rigging, &e. 3 2, nets; 3, salt ; 4, steam-tugs; 5, salesmen and staff ; 6, baskets and swills; 7, carrying carts; 8, washing the herrings; 9, spits; 10, riving and hanging; 11, oak for smoking ; 12, packing; 13, barrels; 14, freight, besides employment to a vast number of smacksmen. Thus we see of what importance red herrings are to Yarmouth, and to how many people and trades they give employment. Surely we English should be most grateful to Providence for giving our country such a rich harvest of the sea. I wish I could persuade some of our influential M.P.’s to come down to Yarmouth and see the immense amount of capital and labour involved in the herring fisheries. We held our official inquiry at Lowestoft in the ‘Fisherman’s Shelter.’ This is a most excellent institu- tion—a large wooden building with plenty of air and a a a NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 205 light, roofed inside like a new church. There is every accommodation for fishermen: excellent tables, good seats, and, above all, good food—cheap, very cheap. A man can get meat, bread, cheese, cocoa, tea, and coffee there for a surprisingly small price. I myself had lunch there off some capital American beef, that was really first- rate. This institution is greatly, if not altogether, indebted to Colonel Leathes, of Herringfleet Hall, for its foundation, and the admirable way in which it is now kept up. The fishermen can come in and out in their working clothes, and get warmth, excellent food, cocoa, &c., much better than they could at any public. In bad weather especially is the Shelter patronised by these brave North Sea fisher- men. Smoking is allowed, which adds greatly to its success. A curious fact which came to my notice at Lowestoft is the acclimatisation of lobsters about the pier. Some years ago a box full of live Norwegian lobsters, the pro- perty of a local fish merchant, got adrift and was broken up; there were in this lot several ‘berried hens,’ 2,¢., lobsters carrying eggs under their tails. The lobsters escaped, and have now permanently established themselves among the rocks. This is a good hint to those who wish to try lobster cultivation elsewhere, and there are many places admirably suited for the experiment. I saw that the teredo is making havoc with the wood piles of some of the harbour structure. The rascals, in spite of copper nails, get in and will scoop out the piles till they become as hollow as chimneys. The fishing- smacks going in and out of the harbour were beautiful to see. A tug was continually going to and fro from the inner 206 NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. harbour, saving the men’s time and labour by tugging 4 the boats either in or out. The quantity of trawl fish on the quay was something amazing, and how it is that the North Sea is not trawled out may be a wonder to many. Still, we must recollect that if England was cut out of a map and placed on the North Sea, drawn to the same scale, England and Scotland could be sunk in the North Sea, — and space still be left over. Again, supposing the trawling — ; vessels to be represented by balloons, and the soles, &c., ; by human beings, the ballooners would be a long time before they could trawl up all the men, women, and children in England and Scotland. I think I have said elsewhere that a trawl net fished almost immediately behind another trawl net would often catch even more fish than the first net. I think this might be illustrated by what I saw at Yarmouth. There | was a wedding at the big church of the place, and when the people saw the carriages going to the wedding they all began to run after the carriages. During the wedding the crowd assembled, and then came the trawl net, as represented by the carriages, into the thick of the crowd to take away the bride and bridegroom, and their friends ; but the more carriages that came, picking up a certain number of the wedding party from the crowd, the thicker the crowd became. I was,much amused at a large red-faced fisherman’s reception of the bride; he established his monstrous self right opposite the window of the bride’s carriage waiting at the door of the church. He was dressed fisherman fashion—tarpaulin hat and jersey. Move, not he! There he stayed with his great ugly head right inside the NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. 207 carriage till the bride moved off from amid the charity children, old women, babies, and the whole turn-out of the poorer parts of Yarmouth, to whom a gratuitous exhibition such as a wedding is a great amusement and delight. | Yarmouth fair happened to take place when I was there. Of course I went into the shows. The best thing by far was the Hairless Horse. Yes, he was perfectly hairless, as bald as a billiard: ball. His hair had not been shaved, he had never had any. Some part of the skin was white, the rest black: the white was very white, like the skin of a sucking pig; the black was the black of the edible Chinese dog, also called the ‘ India-rubber Dog.’ _ There was also on view a living skeleton—certainly a skeleton something awful to look at. He was said to be thirty-four; he might have been any age. He was awfully thin. His wrist would pass through a gauge of one inch and one-eighth. I asked the skeleton what he lived on. He said, ‘ Rump-steaks and porter.’ Anyhow, he certainly did not grow fat on it. I went also to see a ‘ Petrified Mummy,’ about which the showman of course had a long yarn to tell. This was an old friend that I am continually coming across at penny shows—viz., the ‘ Abogine.’ The history of the ‘ Abogine’ is as follows: He is a dried Australian native, thrown in as a bargain with some shells, spears, &c., in a lot, and bought by a dealer. The shells, &c., were sold, but not the dried Australian, and the dealer got quite tired of his bargain. At last he called him an ‘ Abogine,’ and chopped him to some penny showman for some monkeys. The poor ‘ Abogine’ does not get on; showmen can’t make money out of him. The 208 - NOTES FROM YARMOUTH. | * word has been a little twisted. i x. There were a tremendous number of roundabouts in the fair. Why the women, children, and men do not get giddy and fall out of these model boats and rocking-horses, I can’t tell. The sailors were great at the swings, and, I must say, were sent up fearful heights, higher than ane landsmen could or would go. | : 209 LONDON LIRDCATCHERS. PiscaTor et Auceps visited in August 1878 my friend Mr. Higford Burr, at Aldermaston Park, Reading. Pisca- tor is myself, Auceps a professional London birdcatcher, Mr. Davy, whose name is well known to ornithological collectors both in London and elsewhere as a dealer and as a first-class authority on everything pertaining to British birds. I proposed to Mr. Burr that I should bring Davy down to Aldermaston, that the party staying at the house might see the process of catching wild birds, an art about which Londoners know but little. Arriving at Aldermaston in company with the Squire, Mrs. Burr, Sir Austen Layard, then Minister at Madrid, Lady Layard, Dr. Hooker, Mr. Fergusson, &c. &e., we at once started to pitch the net at a place selected by Davy. He told the head keeper he wanted to find a place where the birds came to drink; so, guided by the Squire with his big walking-stick, we at once proceeded to the fish-house, where the Squire breeds his great lake trout, in one of the wildest parts of the forest. The forest at Aldermaston is one of the most beautiful in that part of the country ; the oaks in it are of very great antiquity, some as old, if not older than those in Windsor Park. The Squire takes P 210 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS, great care of these venerable oaks, and doctors them up in a their extreme age. Passing through the forest, it was in- teresting to watch Davy, as he trudged: along with his call-birds and net in ‘ the pack’ on his back through the thick ferns, looking up into the trees, and giving dif- ferent call-bird notes as he went on. His diagnosis of the forest was not, however, very promising. ‘ Not much here, sir,’ he said, ‘except owls and woodpeckers.’ And just at that moment, as luck would have it, a wood- pecker began to holloa. ‘ Hark at him,’ he said; ‘that’s a spotted woodpecker; there ought to be several kinds of woodpeckers in this forest.’ ‘ Yes,’ said the Squire, ‘ there are, and I never allow the keepers to shoot them under any pretence.’ The Squire well knows how very useful these unpaid servants the woodpeckers are in the manage- ment of forest trees. 3 Just by a gate which led us through the high iron deer- fence Davy suddenly halted, and said, ‘ Mr. Buckland, sir, there’s an owl’s nest in that tree.’ ‘If there is,’ I said, ‘Davy, there should be some pellets at the bottom.’ So the Squire and myself routed about among the grass, and in a few minutes we found some eight or ten owls’ pellets. These consist of balls which look like matted hair. After the owl has eaten a mouse, he spits up the hair and the bones in one mass, all the flesh being digested. I have just dissolved out one (only one) of these pellets in water. I find in it the almost perfect skull of a shrew mouse with the most lovely little teeth, and also half the skull of a common mouse. The bones of the shrew are indeed most delicate. I know no other bone the structure of which is so beautiful, and, at the same time, so light. LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. — 211 The Squire’s owls not. only keep down the mice, but at night they give us a most lovely serenade, to my ears far more interesting than the singing of any prima donna at — the Italian Opera. ‘Should not wonder if there isn’t some young owls in that nest,’ said Davy. ‘Up you go, then,’ said I, ‘ and look.’ ‘There’s been young owls here,’ said he, after he had examined, ‘and I can’t tell, they may be in the nest now,’ as he showed me a lot of the down of the young birds. He then explained the proper way to take young owls. The owl’s nest is often deep down in a tree ; it is necessary to wait till the owls get to a certain size; the best way then to catch them is to roll upa stocking or ball of worsted, fastening on a piece of string and letting it down into the nest; the birds immediately turn on their backs and claw at the stocking ; they have not sense to let go, and up they come. The old oaks in Aldermaston Park are very favourite breeding-places for owls, and the Squire does not allow them to be shot. The next morning, after breakfast, Mr. Davy reported to the Squire and myself that he had been out very early to see what the park produced in the shape of birds. He reported numbers of thrushes, blackbirds, jackdaws, star- lings, and rooks, but he had not seen a magpie. He had heard one or two jays, abundance of green woodpeckers, and a few of the summer soft-meat birds, such as the flycatcher, willow-wren, chiff-chaff, and a common shrike.. There was not a small seed-eating bird to be seen either in the forest or the park. The only way Davy could account for their non-appearance was that the park and forest lands had been kept clear of seed-bearing Ee 212 - LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. weeds. He was certain large numbers of all kinds of — birds had been bred in the Squire’s forest and in the gorse, — but having brought out their young they had now left for — their feeding-places. | The Squire gave Davy permission to lay his nets wherever he chose. He selected a spot close to the end of a most beautiful shaded avenue. The process of laying the nets is somewhat as follows:—Two nets, twelve yards ; long, and when open covering the ground for twenty feet in width, are neatly laid down on the ground. To the far ends of the nets are attached staves. The distance Davy stood from the nets to work them was about eighteen yards. © It is impossible to describe the rough yet very excellent machinery by which a pull on the rope held by the bird- eatcher will make these harmless-looking nets instantly q spring into the air and catch the birds, either on the wing or on the ground. They act so quickly that the eye can searcely follow. Anything on the wing crossing the nets within four feet from the ground will be shut in instantly. It is better to catch the bird before he has time to settle. If birds touch the net with their feet they are off instantly. The next process in birdcatching is to put out the ‘brace bird.’ A brace bird is taken from a cage; this bird always wears his brace with a swivel attached, whether at work or no. The brace consists of a piece of string made into a kind of double halter. It is put over the bird’s head, and the wings and legs are passed through; in fact, when I saw Mr. Davy brace a bird I was strongly re- minded of a nurse dressing a baby. When the brace is - on the bird, the feathers fall over it and it cannot be seen. The brace bird is then put on his ‘ flurr stick;’ this is a LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 213 straight stick, which by means of a hinge on its lower end and a string is made to rise and fall at the will of the birdeatcher. Then when any bird is seen coming the flurr stick is gently pulled up, the brace bird all the while standing on the stick is made to hover and to show wing, 7.¢. flutter as though about to settle on the ground: this, of course, is to attract the wild birds to the place. Mr. Davy then proceeded to arrange his call-birds. These birds when put out begin to sing, especially if they hear another bird of the same kind in the distance. The wild ones, being attracted by the decoys, are shown by the brace birds the place where they are wanted to go. No bait is used for the birds; they simply come to the decoy, and imagine from the gall that they, the decoys,, are feeding there. The brace bird that Mr. Davy put on the flurr stick had been at work for three years almost daily. He had been the means of catching thousands of other birds, espe- cially sparrows, ordinarily called ‘Jims.’ Mr. Davy says the call-birds get very artful: sometimes they will give a note of warning or fighting to the wild birds; thus a linnet will set to hipping, that is calling ‘hip, hip, hip,’ several times. This note of the eall-bird causes the linnets coming in a flight instantly to dash away in all direc- tions. The goldfinch will oftentimes set to ‘ gidding,’ that is, saying ‘gid, gid, gid, several times in succession. This has the same effect as the ‘hipping’ of the linnet. The birds are off in a moment. Mr. Davy’s call-bird goldfinch was a very good one, and Mr. Davy put his song into words. By listening attentively. I could make 214 ) LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. out that the goldfinch did really say the following words. ‘ There are two songs of the goldfinch ; one is— Sippat-sippat-slam-slam-slam-siwiddy. The other is— Sippat-widdle-widdle-slam-siwiddy kurr-hurotle-chay. Goldfinches are now becoming very scarce, because the cultivation of land is exterminating the thistles. This year, for the first time, the birdcatchers have gone for them to Ireland, and have sent large takes of gold- finches thence into the London market. During this autumn goldfinches were more abundant; this may be attributed to the provisions of the Bird Preservation Act. At the end of the year the goldfinches lie up in quiet — feeding-places, and remain there as long as the food lasts 5 they will not be seen on flight again until April. The song of the linnet is thus written by Mr. Davy :— Hepe, hepe, hepe, hepe Tollaky, tollaky, quakey, wheet, Heep, pipe, chow, Heep, tollaky, quakey, wheet, Lug, orcher, wheet. This is the song of the wild linnet. The toy linnet is a bird that has been taught to sing by the titlark, woodlark, or yellowhammer; they are educated at an immense amount of trouble. The linnet is taught ‘ in-and-in,’ ‘in-and-in,’ ¢.e. by constant repeti- tion; and only a very few take the perfect song. The song begins thus :-— Pu poy, tollick, tollick, eky quak, E wheet, tollick, cha eyk, quake, wheet. \ LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. | 215 This is one stave of the song. Then follow in due order the following staves :— Phillip, cha eke, quake, wheet. Call up, cha eke, quake, wheet. Tollick, eke, quake, chow. Eke, eke, eke, quak chow. Cluck cluck, chay, ter wheet tollick, eke quake, wheet. Echup, echup, pipe chow. Ah, ah, ah! J-o-e. Eke quake, chow rattle. Tuck, tuck, wizzy ter wheet ; Tolliky, quake wheet. This is the finish of the toy linnet song. When the above song is put together by a properly trained bird it is just like a flute. To get these birds to take the song they must be taken from the nest very young, before they get the eall of the parent birds. Perfect toy linnets are worth almost any sum of money —15l. to 201. would be given readily for a thoroughly good one. Broken song-birds are only worth 30s. to 50s. each. A broken song-bird will not make his stops in the song as given above; he will run one stave into the other. Good toy linnets are very scarce, and their trainers are getting old and dying off. Towards the middle and end of November the bird- eatchers always expect what they designate the ‘ Novem- ber flight of linnets.’ This great flight generally takes place between the 15th and last day of November. The men lay their nets before daybreak. As soon as it is light 216 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. the birds appear. They come in flocks of from two to three hundred; the call-birds ‘charge,’ and give the catchers notice that the birds are coming before they can be seen by the men. Very large takes of these migratory linnets have been made; as many as five dozen have been taken in some years at one pull of the clap-net. Although so many linnets are captured annually, there has been no general diminution noticed in their numbers. The greater number of these birds are bred on the wild gorse lands, especially in Scotland. They are very prolific, and have three to four nests each season, producing from fifteen to twenty young. When this linnet migration from the north takes place, ‘the birdcatchers are certain that some wild weather is coming behind them. Observers will find this right. The linnets when arriving at the south of England disperse themselves over the stubbles, ‘ clover lays,’ and ‘ fed-offs ; ” they eat large quantities of charlock and other wild seeds, which otherwise would be injurious to the farmer. The large takes of these birds in 1878 glutted the bird market. Before the flight cock linnets were worth from four to five shillings a dozen, they soon dropped in price to from eighteenpence to two shillings. Mr. Davy also had a bullfinch, and it was quite wonderful how this bird would answer him at almost any distance. The call consists of a low, plaintive, melancholy whistle. If any wild bullfinch came within the call of this clever bird he would never let him go away, but keep continually working at him. This bullfinch is always worked in an open-top cage, so that he can either be used inside the nets or for birdliming purposes. LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 217 The best time for catching bullfinches is in the black- berry time, viz. September and October. They also eat privet berries and dock seed, but they never begin on the privet berries until after the frost has touched them. Birdliming is a more sporting mode of catching birds than netting, and is thus practised. The bullfinch catcher finds his game principally by his own call. He walks along suitable lanes and margins of woods, continually ealling with his mouth; this is called ‘whooping ;’ it is the challenge or call-note of the bullfinch, and sounds very much like ‘whoop, whoop, whoop.’ In some parts of the country bullfinches are called ‘whoops.’ After a time the man finds his game by a bird answering his call. He im- mediately puts down acall bullfinch in a cage, and a twig already limed near the cage. After atime the decoy ‘ gets hold’ of the wild bird by his call; the man then ceases, leaving the bird to finish his work. The wild bird, being of a pugnacious disposition, challenges the caged bird, and alighting on the stick he is done for immediately, being held fast by the lime. It is not an uncommon thing for a single-handed man to take two dozen bullfinches in a day ; fresh-caught ‘ bullies’ realise to the catcher twelve shillings a dozen for cocks and three shillings a dozen for hens. Cock bullfinches are in some parts of the country ealled ‘soldiers,’ on account of their crimson breasts. ‘ Bullies’ are taught to pipe by being taken very young from the nest, and having one tune constantly hammered into their heads either by a bird-organ or by whistling. _ Numbers of birds, however, will not take to the song in spite of great attention being paid to their education. 218 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS, The Germans are very clever in teaching bullfinches to — pipe. A trainer would think himself very fortunate if four out of twelve ‘ bullies’ became pipers: they are worth three and sixpence each; a perfect piper is sabe from three to four pounds. The nets being spread and the birds put out, we adjourned to the end of the ‘ pull-line,’ in hopes the birds would come, and waited patiently. The silence in the forest was very remarkable. Bully kept on answering Mr. Davy when he chose to talk to him. Davy also talked to the goldfinch and the linnet, and I think Mr. Davy ~ sings the linnet’s song better than the linnet himself. He assists himself in trapping linnets by the use of a small whistle. We waited most: patiently in silence for the birds to come and be caught. But, as Mr. Davy anti- cipated, nothing came to be caught, not even Jims (spar- rows). At last a poor little robin was fool enough to come: in an instant the nets were over him to show us how they acted. Poor little Bobby was taken out of the nets and handled most carefully, and was marked on a feather by the Squire so that he should know him again. I had the curiosity to put the robin to my ear to listen to his heart. . The rapidity with which his poor little heart was going was amazing ; it was perfectly impossible to count the pulsations, the sound was like a locomotive letting off her steam. This was caused by the sudden surprise of the moment. Birds cannot change their faces or show any symptom of alarm, or the Bobby would probably have looked white about the gills. The question has arisen if a robin could be brought to talk. Mr. Keilich, the naturalist, tells me that he knew LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 219 of a robin who said, ‘ Pretty Bob; pretty Bob. Come and kiss Bobby.’ But Mr. Davy says he has never heard of a robin talking. The blackbird is a great mimic, or rather mocking- bird. If taken young he will go through one or two songs. Davy had one that would whistle ‘ Pop goes the weasel,’ and ‘ Hey, jim along, jim along Josey; hey, jim along, jim along Joe.’ He would sing at any time at command. Mr. Searle, my secretary, says he heard a blackbird in the Mile End Road sing the principal parts of the Huntsman’s Chorus. If any one wishes to try the experiment of training a blackbird, he must raise one or two young ones from the nest. As a rule, two out of three will take the song taught them. The blackbird is very pugnacious, and this is a drawback to his being kept in an aviary with other small birds. Wormwood Scrubs was once a celebrated place for catching birds, especially starlings. Mr. Davy has caught there from two to three dozen at one pullof the net. The nets must be laid so as to begin catching at dawn. By eleven o’clock starlings are ‘fed up’ and are off; they go for shelter into the woods, to get out of the heat of the sun. Five or six dummies—+7.e. stuffed starlings—are placed near the nets to attract the wild birds, and also one live bird on a ‘flurr stick’ The autumn is the best time to catch starlings. They are very artful. It is necessary to ‘take a cut’ at them—that is, pull the net sharp the moment they get within reach of it. They will often hover over the net, not making up their minds to go in. This is the time to ‘cut them in.’ The birds about in 220 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. August, being mostly young, are not ‘up to the game ’— that is, the net work—but they will very soon learn it and get artful. Starlings are extensively used for trap-shooting. The price varies from five shillings to six shillings per dozen. Directly after the breeding season Mr. Davy would take a twenty-dozen order at two days’ notice. Sparrows are also much used for shooting purposes. Large numbers of them leave London after harvest and go upon the stubblesto feed; by September there are hardly any sparrows in London. They return again during the winter months when ploughing begins. After many have been caught and their number thinned they be- come artful, and the moment they see the net they ery ‘Jim, jim, jim,’ and are off. An old Jim is as cunning as an old man, from seeing his pals so often caught in the net. Sparrows are a great pest at the Zoological Gardens, entering into the houses, and es- pecially the warm houses in the winter. They are not at all shy, but enter into almost all the houses where the animals and birds are fed, helping themselves to the most delicate morsels and luxuries. In the winter the sparrows are caught by bat-folding. Bat-folding is eommonly used in the country for catching all kinds of birds. , Mr. Davy in his time has supphed large numbers of gentlemen with pigeons (blue rocks) for trap-shooting. These pigeons are bred in many parts of the country by thousands in dove-cots, and bought up by the dealers. Any kind of sharp-flying pigeon is also used when the price of blue rocks is objected to. Blue rocks vary from LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 221 16s. to 24s. per dozen, common kinds from 12s. to 15s. Davy has supplied twenty-two dozen or 264 birds a day. After they are shot and brought home the birds will always fetch 6s. per dozen. If in good condition there is always a ready sale. Pigeons are very pugnacious. If two cock pigeons are put in a cage together, they will fasten on to each other by the beak, and cut away with the wings until one is completely mastered. Scotch larks are abundant in England; they locate themselves on the clover and grass lands, where they are taken by thousands on dull nights with trammel nets. At the beginning of the winter they are sold dead indiscriminately, both cocks and hens, just as they are caught. By the end of January the catchers can find ready purchasers for the live cock birds. The price of cock larks then rises monthly up to the end of April. In January they fetch four shillings a dozen, in April there is a ready market at twelve shillings a dozen. Wood-pigeons are very numerous in the early winter, and large numbers are then sent to the London market. They are then in the very finest condition, and are regular ‘lumps of meat.’ They are very good for table when stuffed with sage and onions and roasted like ducks. When the severe weather sets in, the damage that is done to the farmers by wood-pigeons is great; they destroy large quantities of swedes and turnips, spoiling more than they eat. These birds peck out the heart of the green part in the centre of the turnip ; in doing this they make a deep hole, the water then gets in, and the turnips are destroyed by the first frost. In years when there are no beech-nuts, 222 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. the wood-pigeons make more inroads than ever among the turnips. Wood-pigeons also do much damage to the vetches grown for early lamb-feeding. The siskins, chaffinches, bramble-finches, and haw- finches that come in the Michaelmas flight, and locate themselves where food is abundant, disappear before winter, and the birdeatchers cannot find their whereabouts. In all probability they will not show up again on flight until the middle or end of February. Fieldfares, redwings, and missel thrushes then arrive in large quantities, and are to be found about the environs of London so long as they ean get food ; they are very wary birds, but the moment frost and snow set in they are easily approached. The redwing of all the thrushes is the most duck-hearted ; he will soon succumb to the cold, even when the berry food is abundant ; he cannot exist long without ‘ground food,’ that is, worms and insects. As it was very hot we sat down in the shade to rest, while Mr. Davy gave us a yarn about his birds. It was unusual for a thrush to be in song so late, viz., August 17, as at this time these birds are in full moult. August, in fact, is the dullest month in the year for song. Nearly all the birds, being ‘sore in moult,’ hide away in damp, shady places. Mr. Davy has put the song of most birds into words. He repeated the words of a thrush’s song, and I found by carefully listening that the bird does actually sing the following words :— Knee deep, knee deep, knee deep, Cherry du, cherry du, cherry du, cherry du ; White hat, white hat. Pretty Joey, pretty Joey, pretty Joey. LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 223 My readers should learn these words by heart, and listen to a thrush singing. They will find the thrush pro- nounces the above words as nearly as possible. Repeat them all, even when no bird is present, rapidly in a bird- like manner, and see the effect. It is very difficult to word a blackbird’s song. Mr. Davy can imitate a blackbird’s song so well that he can bring Mr. Blackbird up to him to be caught, but he can- not put his song into words. Having got on to the language of birds, Mr. Davy gave us some more examples. I give his reading of the song of the nightingale. The song is commenced in ‘ wheet- ing and kurring,’ which may thus be written :— Wheet, wheet, kurr, k-u-u-r-r-r. The song after that continues,— Sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, Jug, jug, jug, jug, jug, Swot, swot, swot, swotty. They keep on thesenotes a long time, finishing up with ‘swotting and kurring.’ The song must be pronounced with great inflexions—crescendo-diminuendo, I think the lady pianists call it ; especially modify the ‘ sweet, sweet,’ and pronounce it in a plaintive manner. The ‘jug, jug, jug’ is quick, like a dog barking.’ 1 The following note has been kindly sent me :—‘ The “ wild bird,” whose liquid warble our Poet Laureate, in his “In Memoriam,” recog- nises as characteristic of both joy and grief, had some two hundred years ago his much-loved song reduced to words and letters by a well-known and very learned Jesuit, Marco Bettini. This production was at that time deemed a most successful one, but about a hundred years ago a German naturalist named Bechstein made what many call O24. ie LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. : F I hear the peasants in Brittany translate the night- ingale’s song thus :— Le bon Dieu m’a donné une femme, Que j’ai tant, tant, tant tant battue Que s'il m’en. donne une autre ; Je ne la batterais Plus, plus, plus — Q’un petit, q’un petit, q’un petit. The wagtails have different calls. The call of the black-and-white wagtail is ‘ Physic, physic, physic,’ quickly repeated, and with a whistle Davy can make them come close up. Listen to the first wagtail you hear, and you will find he invokes the aid of the medical profession. As there were no small seed-eating birds in the park, Mr. Davy then gave us a lecture on birdlime. He first of all gave us the process of makingit. There are two ways of making birdlime The first is to get a quart of linseed oil and boil it down to a little over half a pint. The process of making it is dangerous. The oil gets so an improvement on Bettini’s “Song of the Nightingale,” and I forward you a copy of it :— Tiouou, tiouou, tiouou, tiouou Shpe tiou tokoua ; Tio, tio, tio, tio Kououtio, kououtiou, kioutiou, koutioutio ; Tokuo tskouo, tskouo, tskono Tsu, tsti, tsti, tst, tsu, tsti, tsti, tsti, tsi, tsti, tsti Kouorror, tiou, tksoua, pipetk souis Tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, tso, Tsirrbading, Tsi, tsi, si, tosi, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, Tsorre, tsorre, tsorre, tsorreki, Tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsatu, tsi Blo, blo, blo, dlo, dlo, dlo, dlo, dlo, Kouiou, trrrrrrrrretgt, Su, su, su, ly, ly, ly, li, i, li, li’ LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. | 225 - very hot that a pipkin is obliged to be used. When boiled down the oil must be poured into cold water, and is then very apt to fly up in the face and scald baldly; the stench of it is almost unbearable. The birds principally caught with birdlime are gold- finches, bullfinches, woodlarks, and chaffinches. Mr. Davy told us he would make the other kind of birdlime in our presence, if the Squire would allow him to eut off a bit of holly bark from a tree. Davy chose a thick old tree; he cut a piece about four inches square from the outer bark, and divided it into three. He gave the Squire one piece, myself one piece, keeping a piece him- self, and told us to put itin our mouths and chewit. The taste of the bark was of an agreeable bitter-—-the bitter cup of the chemist’s shop. In about five minutes the holly bark, being thoroughly crushed between the teeth, began to be very tenacious, and in about ten minutes the birdlime was produced. It is wonderfully sticky stuff, and it is difficult to rub off the hands, and much more so off the moustache ; in fact, at the end of the operation it was difficult to talk. This, then, is a new discovery for the Pharmacopeeia. It will be a capital thing for a lady or gentleman who talks too much, if you can only once persuade him or her that holly bark is a tonic which would do them good. In about five minutes it would shut up their chatter. It is not an uncommon thing in London for clever thieves to place a small portion of birdlime on a walking- stick; the confederate then takes away the barmaid’s attention, and the man with the stick takes the coin from the bar. Another trick is to place a small portion of Q 226 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. birdlime on a silver coin and give it to the barmaid, and it is amusing to see how she tries to throw it into the till; or, in fact, get rid of it out of her hands at all. The birdlime we made from the Squire’s holly bark turned out very good when it was quite finished. Davy trinmphantly showed it to the Squire, and assured us it would ‘ hold a duck or a parrot; he would not get away unless his feathers came out.’ ! Mr. Davy had got to this point of his lecture when the gong at the mansion sounded for luncheon, and of course we went back at once. At luncheon I was obliged to give an account of our morning’s proceedings, and we all began to ‘talk bird.’ Sir A. Layard informed me that the swallows leave Venice about St. James’s Day, July 25, and the day after they leave the mosquitoes begin. He also told me that in this year all about Verona the locusts came in millions, devouring everything before them, and they were followed up by vast flocks of the roller (Coracias garrula), which devoured them in numbers. He also said that when making his discoveries at and about Nineveh the natives used to catch quail in a wonderfully clever manner by throwing a casting-net over them. He regretted we had not yet introduced the gigantic partridge, the ourkakich, the royal partridge of the Per- 1 The following is a recipe for making birdlime. Peel off the bark of the holly ia July, and remove the outer rind, the brown epidermis ; put the bark into boiling water in an earthen vessel, and let it remain about a fortnight in a damp place. Then take it out and bruise it well - until it becomes a paste. This wash in cold water, to separate all ex- traneous matters, and leave it for four days, when a sort of scum will appear on the surface. Take off the scum, and the birdlime is fit for use, and will hold a duck as firmly as the famed Polytechnic cement does china. a ee ee es ee eee ee a LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. 227 slans, or Caspian snow partridge. I also learned a new plan they had in Madrid to turn birds into politi- cians ; they dye pigeons various colours, and let them fly when any fun is to be made or politicians are to be annoyed. Doves are also dyed and turned loose when any particular pruma donna sings at the theatre; the doves being dyed with her favourite colours. As the name Davy came into conversation, some one asked what was the meaning of the sailor’s phrase, ‘ Davy Jones’s locker.’ A gentleman present, who had been in India, immediately told us, to our great delight, that ‘Deva Loka’ is the ‘Goddess of Death’ in Hindustani. _ Some English Forecastle Jack must thave heard this ex- pression, and put in the word ‘Jones’ to make it sound right. The best time for seeing the nets in full operation is at daybreak on commons, waste lands, or seed-growers’ grounds. After ten o’clock in the morning the catching ceases to a great extent, for the birds having fed ‘lay up. Towards evening the birds again work the feeding- places, but the birdcatchers have generally then left the ground. The captured birds are carefully taken out of the net and immediately placed in cages called ‘store cages.’ The doors of the cages are at the top, and made with the leg of a stocking fastened on: a usual wooden door would not answer, as the birds might slip out when fresh additions were made. © All kinds of British birds, from a wren up to a rook, can be taken in the pull net. During ordinary weather the nets are worked by decoy and ‘flurr birds’ on the open lands. During the hot Q 2 . ye 228 LONDON BIRDCATCHERS. weather the nets are worked on the margins of brooks, lakes, or ponds. ; Birds will go for miles to a clear-running, gravelly- bottomed stream. An experienced catcher on passing a suitable place can tell it immediately ; the signs are that the shallow water on the edge of the pool is muddy, and the tracks of the birds are visible in the mud. Birds fre- quent the water for drinking, washing, and moulting purposes about midday during the hot weather. By this mode of netting, which is called ‘the water- trap, many British birds which will take no notice of call-birds are captured. Among these are taken the black and white flycatcher, woodpecker, jays and magpies, doves, wood-pigeons, blackcaps, butcher-birds, lesser and larger pettichaps, thrushes, blackbirds, and all the titmouse tribe. oa 229 SIR WALTER SCOTT'S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD. I MAKE it a rule invariably to buy the local guide-book of every place I have to visit. When at Melrose, in September 1879, on an official inquiry into the salmon disease in the Tweed, I found to my delight in the guide- book that Abbotsford, Sir Walter Scott’s residence, was not very far off; so | made up my mind to go and visit it, as there was just time so to do before our court began the next day. I was so interested in what I saw, that I now venture to describe the appearance of the home of this illustrious Scotch baronet. An old college scout at Christ Church, Oxford, one ‘Cicero Cook,’ held an aphorism that a man’s character could be told by the books and surroundings in his study. At Sir Walter Scott’s house, therefore, I expected to find a reflex of the thoughts of the great novelist. The house itself stands at the bottom of a steep de- clivity which leads from the main road. It is built close to the Tweed, and the Gala water falls into it just below. The general appearance of the house is that of an old castle, but built with modern stone, after a design suggested by the antiquarian mind of Sir Walter Scott, who evidently treasured up many things which otherwise would have perished. For instance, the old Tolbooth, of Edinburgh, 230 SIR WALTER SCOTT'S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD. having been demolished in 1817, the stones of the portal were given to Sir Walter Scott, and rebuilt into a doorway, which bears the following inscription :— The Lord of Armies ts mp protector, Hlessit av thay that trust in the Lor0.—_AADBLEFV. I had to wait a few minutes in the ante-hall before the guide came to conduct us over the house. In this little room were several very curious prints, especially a picture of a sea-fight, the ‘ Wolverine,’ Captain Montague, taking some French luggers ; a desperate fight between the Russian and Cossack cavalry, 1800; and a procession in Edinburgh; also a trunk made of tiger- skin, probably a present to Sir Walter years ago. The first room we were ushered into was Sir Walter Scott’s study, the furniture of which is left exactly as when Sir Walter died. The table on which he wrote is an old-fashioned affair, but has many drawers and many wings, just the table to suit a man who had a great many papers to deal with. The arm-chair is covered with leather, the sort of chair into which a busy man would delight to throw himself back and think. Near the fireplace is a piece of furni- ture made from portions of the Spanish Armada, with this motto: ‘ Afflavit Deus et disipantur.’ The tables in the dining-hall at Westminster School are made from portions of the wreck of the same Armada. Allround the room there are numerous shelves with books, and halfway up the room a gallery with more books, very like what we have at the Atheneum Club. It may be possible that Sir Walter took the hint from the Athenzum, which was SIR WALTER SCOTT'S HOME AT ABBOTSFORD. 23] founded in 1824, and of which Sir Walter was one of the first members. Behind the chair is a cupboard devoted to Sir Walter’s pipes and sticks, and I was delighted to find out that Sir Walter Scott smoked. Among the books I noticed bound copies of the French newspaper, the ‘Moniteur.’ I could not think why Sir Walter had such a collection of the ‘ Moniteur’ until Mr. Walpole, who was with me, told me he thought Sir Walter Scott had bound them because they would cons tain Napoleon’s bulletins, and were the official repository of French despatches in those days. In return for his kindness I told Mr. Walpole that I should be only too pleased if I could find any book in the library relating to his family, so I looked about sharp, and within five minutes I caught sight of two—namely, ‘ Orford’s Works ’ and ‘ Memoir of Horace Walpole.’ The next room to the study, the drawing-room, is a wonderful place. At one end of it stands an admirable bust of Sir Walter by my godfather, Sir Francis Chantrey. In a bay-window is a table containing many interesting relics, as follows :— Portrait of James Stuart, born June 10, 1688, died at Rome, 1766. The purse of Rob Roy, also the Skein Dhu (English, black knife or dagger) belong- ing to Rob Roy. The tumbler used by Burns. Tam O’ Shanter’s snuff-box. Napoleon’s portfolio, ornamented with golden bees; this, if I mistake not, was presented to Sir Walter by the Duke of Wellington, probably at the time when he was writing ‘The Life of Napoleon;’ the Duke’s autograph accompanies Napoleon’s portfolio. Saieee I made a most careful examination of the ‘ castoreum,’ and afterwards a splendid preparation of it. The casto- reum is secreted by two glandular bodies, each about an inch and a half long. These I ascertained, by means of a bristle, communicate with a pouch, which appeared quite flaccid. I introduced a blowpipe, and was delighted tofind — that there existed an immense pouch. The momentit was full I cast it, so as to preserve its exact shape, and found that when fully extended the pouch measured eleven and a half inches long over the bend, and eleven inches round, and would contain about a pint of water. I have not — the least idea of the use of the pouch. The castoreum itself is a resinous kind of secretion, and when burnt has q . a highly aromatic odour. Two kinds of castor are met with in the drug trade; — the best is from Russia, Prussia, and Poland, but is now q scarcely to be obtained. The pods are large and firm, and ~ their contents dry, of a red-brown colour, pulverulent, but 3 somewhat tough, of a strong and peculiar odour, and a bitter, nauseous taste. The castor ordinarily sold is im- 9 ported from Canada. The podsare usually flatter, smailer, q and moister than the former, and their contents so miscel- 4 laneous as to baffle all attempts at description. The 4 matter which they contain is commonly of a yellow or buff a colour, of a resinous appearance, and a faint odour. Sometimes it is soft, viscid, and fetid in the extreme; — sometimes unctuous, and sometimes black and inodorous. 4 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 277 The yellow resinous kind is usually preferred, but it is difficult to say on what grounds. Castor has been extolled as a safe and effectual anti- spasmodic in typhus, hysteria, and epilepsy; but its un- certain composition and quality, and its extremely bigh price, are objections to its use. Moreover, its virtues are of a very doubtful description, and it seems uncertain whether any real benefit has followed the use of the drug in its most genuine form. It has been administered in doses of from ten to twenty grains, the tincture is also prescribed as an addition to anti-nervous mixtures. As regards the use made of this castoreum by the animal himself, Lord Bute made the following observations :— ‘Two of the animals were for a long time shut up ina part of the battlements of the castle at Cardiff, where I had a temporary pond built for them, and could watch them very well, which I did. They would often come out and sit upon the edge of the water, grooming their coats with their fore-paws. The action was something between a cat washing, and a monkey scratching itself. They would scratch their heads, and then rub their faces with both paws. The effect was extremely grotesque, very much heightened by the creatures’ imperturbable look of stupid gravity. On these occasions I always observed a peculiar action, which I never doubted was that of taking the castoreum on their paws and lubricat- ing their bodies with it.’ In November 1874 a third dead beaver was sent me by the Marquis, who wrote: ‘ Another of the beavers is dead. It was seen quite well apparently, as late as Sunday morning, when it was working at a tree which it had just succeeded 278 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. in felling. On Tuesday it was found dead. The only one, 4 therefore, which is, as far as I know, alive, is one of those which eseaped to the moors. It is exceedingly provoking, and to me quite inexplicable. The climate here cannot | be worse than that of Canada; the inclosure in which they were is very large, indeed, they never seem to have visited six-sevenths of it; the variety of trees offered to their ravages is very great, and they took to the alders, and, to a certain extent, the oaks, quite freely. Perhaps your post-mortem may enable you to give some solution. I am very loth to abandon the effort to acclimatise them altogether. I have just had a conversation with the gamekeeper, who has taken much interest and trouble in the matter. His opinion is, tirst, that the beaver which escaped on to the moors is dead, as no new traces of work appear; second, that the two French beavers were too much domesticated, and accustomed to be fed, parti- cularly with special food, such as bread, corn, willow bark, &e., to be able to shift for themselves in a wild state; and third, that if the American (and wilder) ones had not es- caped, they would have lived; and that, with attention to these points, one need not despair yet.’ _ The third beaver, which I was so sorry to find on my dissecting-table, measured three feet three inches, and weighed twenty-two pounds and a half. There were no- marks whatever of external injury. On taking off the skin I found there was little or no fat, and that the animal was very much out of condition ; there was no food in the stomach, but a quantity of gnawed vegetable matter in the intestines. Knowing that the Marquis would be anxious to have as much information as possible on the LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 279 cause of the poor beast’s death, Mr. Bartlett came down to give his opinion. He considered, as we could find no post-mortem appearances, except slight inflammation of the lungs, not sufficient to account for death, that it was possible that something had been wrong with the food on which the beaver had been living. He feeds his own beavers at the Zoological upon boughs of poplar and willow, of both of which they are very fond. He also gives them carrots, biscuits, and Indian corn. The loss of these valuable animals was unfortunate, their usual price being between seventy and eighty pounds per pair. In January 1875 Lord Bute obtained eight more beavers through Mr. Jamrach. These eight beavers were originally captured in North America, and were then sent to Germany, where they were kept for three months in a stable. Mr. Bartlett inspected the beavers with me before their purchase, and we were satisfied they were in good condition. As, however, the boxes in which they were confined were very dilapidated through long travel, and the weather excessively cold, we determined to give them a rest, and allow them to have a good sleep and a wash before sending them on to Scotland. Mr. Bartlett, therefore, offered to take them in at the Gardens, and turned them out into two beautiful dens close by the wombats, just behind the kangaroo sheds. Having given them a few days’ rest, I inspected them again. The keeper turned them carefully out from their warm bed of straw, at which they seemed exceedingly indignant. The biggest of them, a very fine animal, sat up on his haunches, and made a curious noise, something between ‘ 280 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. a grunt and a growl. All of them slapped their tails violently on the brick pavement, giving a sharp crack. This probably is a warning signal in time of danger. It is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain the sexes — of these animals. There were, however, two big ones, five of a moderate size, and one very little one. They were all sent to the Isle of Bute, via Glasgow. We advised that a kind of pigsty should be made for them, in which a warm nest of straw should be placed, and that they should then be allowed to gnaw themselves out. If they could find a better place to build their own nest in the open, they would do so; if not, they would come back to sleep in the nest which had been made for them. Thus they would gradually be able to make themselves comfortable in their new home. Their food should consist of Indian corn, carrots, biscuits, and more especially willow boughs, of which they are exceedingly fond, and without which they will hardly thrive. About the same time Lord Bute sent me the following interesting and welcome intelligence:—‘ A very unex- pected episode has taken place here with the beavers. You remember that two of the original four escaped to the moors, and though the body of only one of them was found, — both were believed to have died. But itis not so. The other animal has turned up in a large pond surrounded with trees, close to a farm about one and a half or two miles from where he had last been seen. His labours are quite gigantic considering his size and his being alone. He has felled a poplar with a girth of between three and four | 4 feet, and is taking it piecemeal to his head-quarters in a swamp at the other end of the pond, where are already q LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 281 collected many large branches, almost logs. He seems to feed eagerly upon the water-plants in the pond, which is large, and altogether well adapted for his residence. The whole thing is very curious, as showing that the creature is able to live and flourish in a perfectly wild state in this country.’ Companions were afterwards found for the solitary beaver. In September 1877 I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity of examining Lord Bute’s beavers in the beautiful home he had prepared for them. H.ML.S. ‘Jackal’ in her cruise anchored at Rothesay, and the morning after our arrival, Captain Digby, the officers of the ‘Jackal,’ my colleagues and myself, chartered a carriage to pay a visit to the beavers. -At some little distance from Mount Stewart House there is a lonely pine-wood. Through part of this wood runs a naturalstream. In the centre of the wood a stone wall has been built, in such a manner as to keep the beavers perfectly quiet and undisturbed. As far as could be ascertained by the curator of the beavery, there were twelve beavers. There were certainly one or more young ones in the big house which these most intelligent animals had erected. These when born are about as large as rats; and from their size and other observations the curator thinks that beavers have two litters of cubs in the year. On entering the enclosure one might easily imagine that a gang of regular woodcutters had been at work felling the trees all around them. Woodcutters had in- deed been at work very busily, but they were not biped 282 LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. labouring men working with sharp axes, but fur-clad 1 quadrupeds, armed by nature with one sharp, powerful teeth. The original stream, which flows gently down a slight incline, is now divided out into one larger and two smaller ponds, by means of dams or weirs, which the beavers have built directly across the run of the water. } It is difficult, if not impossible, to see these wonderful dam-makers at work, as they generally, I hear, are out at night, and are very shy beasts. From the structure they have made, it is evident that they work with a design, I may even say with adefinite plan. The trees have been cut down in such a manner that they shall fall in the position in which the beaver thinks they would be of the greatest service to the general structure, generally right across the stream. The cunning fellows seem to have found out that the lowest dam across the river would re- ceive the greatest pressure of water upon it. This dam, therefore, is made by far the strongest. They seem to have packed, repaired, and continually attended to the tender places which the stream might make in their engineering work. | A fact still more curious—the custodian of the beavers pointed out to us a portion of the work where the dam was strutted up and supported by the branches of trees extending from the bed of the stream below to the sides of the dam—forming, in fact, as good supports to the general structure as any engineer could have devised. The beavers’ hut, made by themselves, looks like a heap of sticks or waste firewood, and presents nothing LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 283 _ to attract much attention. Of course I could not disturb it, but it appeared to be composed of tree boughs and barked sticks. In ‘Land and Water,’ March 28, 1868, a drawing is given of the ‘beaver’s home,’ as seen by a correspondent who had an opportunity of taking a beaver’s house to pieces; here is his report. ‘The beaver’s home looks like a huge bird’s-nest turned upside down, and is generally located in the grassy coves of lakes, by the edge of still-water rivers or artificial ponds, and less frequently by a river side, where a bend or jutting rocks afford a deep eddying pool near the bank. The house rests on the bank, but always overlaps the water in which the front part is immersed, and, as a general rule, the bottom of the stream. or lake is deepened in the channel approaching the entrance by dredging, thereby assuring a free passage below the ice.’ He then described the architectural design of the beavers’ house. It was a large house, nearly eighteen feet in diameter at the water line, and nearly five feet in height. ‘On the outside the sticks were thrown somewhat loosely, but as we unpiled them, and examined the structure more closely, the work appeared better, the boughs laid more horizontally, and firmly bound in with mud and grass. About two feet from the top we unroofed the chamber, and presently disclosed the interior arrange- ments. The chamber—there was but one—was very low, scarcely two feet in height, though about nine feet in diameter. It had a gentle slope upwards from the water, the margin of which could be just seen at the edge. There were two levels inside—one, which we shall term the hall, a sloping mud bank, on which the animal - x * * ¥ ‘ é - » 5 a.” * X\ 284 LORD BUTE'S BEAVERS. emerges from the subaqueous tunnel and shakes himself ; ~ and the other, an elevated bed of boughs ranged round the back of the chamber, and much in the style of a guard-bed, 7.e., the sloping wooden trestle usually found in a military guard-room. The couch was comfortably covered with lengths of dried grass and rasped fibres of wood, similar to the shavings of a toy broom. The ends of the timbers and brushwood, which projected inwards, were smoothly gnawed off all round. There were two entrances ; the one led into the water at the edge of the chamber, and let in the light; the other went down at a deeper angle into the black water. The former was evi- dently the summer entrance, the latter being used in winter to avoid the ice. The interior was perfectly clean, no barked sticks (the refuse of the food) being left about. These were all distributed on the exterior, which accounts for the bleached appearance of many houses we have seen. In turning over the materials of the house I picked up several pieces of wood of but two or three inches in length, which, from their shortness, puzzled me as to the reason of so much trouble being taken by the beaver for appa- rently so small a purpose. My Indian, however, en- lightened me. The side on whicha young tree is intended to fall is first cut through—say two-thirds—then the other side one-third a little higher up. The tree slips off the stem, but will not fall prostrate, owing to the intervention of branches of adjacent trees. So the beaver has to gnaw a little above to start it again, exactly on the plan adopted by the lumberman in case of a catch amongst the upper branches, when the impetus of another slip dis- engages the whole tree. The ovcupants of the house were ws LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 285 out for the day, as they Panerai are Pen the summer, being engaged in travelling up and down the brooks, and collecting provisions for the winter consump- tion.’ | Mr. Bartlett and I closely examined the markings of the beavers’ chisel-like teeth on the trees which they had cut down. These trees were oak, larch, pine, birch, and willow. The young ones, judging from the markings of their teeth, ‘arenot such good workmenas their parents, and one would al- most imagine that it was necessary for them to go through some sort of education in cutting down trees. It is very interesting to observe how the beaver goes to work to cut down a tree. Attacking one side, he cuts, by means of his sharp chisel, a regular notch in the tree. One side of this notch is flat, like a saw cut; the other side is brought down to the saw cut by an angle; in fact, he cuts down the trees by the same sort of incision as we ourselves employ to cut a stick out of the hedge. Mr. Bartlett informs me that he has seen the beaver put his head so far into the notch that he was afraid the weight of the tree from above would crush down upon him and smash his head; but Mr. Beaver is a better carpenter than this. Mr. Bartlett has seen him at this stage of the proceedings come out and go toa little distance, sit on his hind legs, and inspect the tree with the air of an engineer looking at a scaffold in process of construction. When the beaver has gnawed his notch as deep as he dare into the tree, the cunning fellow will test its stability by standing on his hind legs and pushing the tree, to see the degree of firmness of the portion which holds the two pieces of wood together ; but how is he to separate this bit which unites the wood? He simply leaves off 286 - LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. gnawing the big notch he has made. He then goes to the other side, where the bark and wood have not been touched at all, and gnaws away until down comes the tree. | The beavers are most industrious little animals. These water carpenters have converted the place into a regular subterranean city, for they have burrowed out the earth in such a manner as to form streets, galleries, highways, and by-ways. These runs, I imagine, are made primarily for the purposes of safety, and secondly that the homes or dams may be connected together, so that the families living in the different huts may be able at will to visit their friends. ) These animals were at one time very common in North Wales. There is a valley running up from Bangor towards Snowdon, called Beaver’s Hollow (Nant yr Afangewm). The more modern name is Nant Frangon ; the river Ogwen runs through the vale. There are several Llyn yr Afanges (Beavers’ Pools) in different parts of the country; and Giraldus Cambrensis, who wrote in 1188, says that beavers were found in considerable numbers near one of the Car- diganshire rivers. Hywel Dda made a law fixing the price of the. Llost lydan’s, or broad-tailed animal’s skin, at 120 pence, a high sum for those days, but we must recollect that the skin of the beaver was one of the chief articles of finery and luxury in dress that the Welsh then possessed. Mr. Kinahan, of the Geological Survey of Ireland, wrote me thus :— ‘Some Irish lake-basins may possibly have been formed by beavers’ dams. This suggestion, however, is merely con- ~ LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. 287 jectural, and prompted by the form of some of the lake- basins. Against it is the fact that although the beaver is known to have been an inhabitant of Wales during the historical period, yet we have been unable to find in the Trish annals any record of its existence. . . . There does not appear to be any real native Irish word for beavers. In O’Keelly’s dictionary we find “ Dobhran-leasleathan, a beaver,” but he seems to have taken this from the Scotch- Gaelic, as no mention of beaver is known in any Irish MS. Dobhran means water-animal, and leasleathan broad-tailed. The Welsh for beaver is similar, namely llostlydan, broad- tail.’ As regards the existence of beavers on the Continent, my late learned friend Signor Valetta informed me that Dante (who died 1321) mentioned beavers as then existing in the Danube. He called them bevero, and implied that they eat fish. The Italian name is now castero. Signor Valetta wrote me thus :— ‘Dante mentions the beaver in Canto xvii. of ‘ Inferno,’ as a comparison with the assumed posture of Geryon (a monster represented by mythologists as having three bodies and three heads), on the precipitous bank of the infernal abyss. Dante and Virgil have arrived on the border of a dismal unfathomable chasm which falls straight to the Well of Giants, and hence to the centre of the earth. As the bank is steep, and there is no practi- cable descent, and descend they must, Virgil bids the poet ungird himself of a rope which tied his waist, and give it to him. This rope was symbolical of penance, humiliation, and repentance, being the rope worn by the Franciscans, to whose society it seems the poet was 288 * LORD BUTE’S BEAVERS. Sor ; affiliated. Virgil throws the rope down the abyss, and a at this bidding the monster comes up to carry them down, 4 and waiting for them places his claws on the bank, and — swings with the hinder coil in the air. Here comes the — comparison :— Come tal volta stanno a riva i burchi, Che parte sono in acqua, e parte in terra ; E come la tra li Tedeschi lurchi Lo bevero s’assetta a far sua guerra ; Cosi la fiera pessima si stava Su Vorlo, che, di pietra, il sabbion serra. which may be thus translated :— ‘« As sometimes boats are so placed as to stand part in the water and part on shore, and as there amongst the © glutton Germans the beaver sits down to wage its war, in the same way sat Geryon.”’ Then Mr. Valetta says that the commentator on Dante, Brunone Bianchi, affirms ‘that the beaver sits down to wage his war against fishes,’ and all other commen- tators follow in his track, from which it is evident that the commentators aforesaid, although doubtless very learned classical scholars, were certainly not naturalists. The beaver is not a fish-eater, never was, and never will be. He is a typical rodent or gnawing animal ; his incisor teeth are formed like chisels to cut down boughs; his molar teeth to eat vegetable substances only. Itis about as sensible a thing to say a beaver eats fish as to describe _ a rabbit or a guinea-pig eating fish. Dante himself, when 3 he had finished this line, was evidently puzzled to write what the beaver was waging war against, and showed LORD BUTE'S BEAVERS. 289 his discrimination in not affirming a fact of which he was not cognisant. This mistake about the beavers eating fish has been lying dormant for about six hun- dred years, and it is pretty nearly time that the mistake should be rectified. 290 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. His Royal Highness Prince Christian has been kind enough to allow me to place on record an event which I believe to be unique in the annals of forestry, viz. a curious cata- strophe to one of the red deer of Windsor Park, which will be of the highest interest to all owners of deer parks, whether at home or abroad, to the proprietors and lessees of Highland shootings, to naturalists, and the public in general. It may be remembered that in January 1879 we had some very severe weather, with snow and frost. On January 16, one of the keepers who has charge of her Majesty’s deer in the royal domains, was going his rounds, when, to his great amazement, he suddenly came upon the scene represented in Fig, 2, namely, a magnificent red deer lying on his back, with his leg tightly fixed in the forked branch of a whitethorn tree. This unfortunate animal presented the following appearance:—He was lying on his near or left side, the tip of his right shoulder was supported against the trunk of the tree. The chest and fore-part of his body were clear of the ground, suspended by his right or off-foot, between the fork of the tree. A closer examination showed exactly what we see WUVd POSGNIM NY PVIS V OL LNAGIOOVY—ZG SITY Fe ee eZ FE } = eae Se ee MW LS eae ee Si; == oe yp | 1) \\ A 7 292 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A - in Fig. 3, except that the body of the animal is (in the engraving) no longer attached to the foot. The keeper attempted to remove the foot, but found it so tightly — fixed that with all his force he was quite unable to do so. The appearance of the stag’s foot was as follows:—The — shank bone was fractured and splintered diagonally. The fractured bones had made their exit by acut right through the skin, thus causing a compound comminuted fracture. The portion of the bone below this fracture—tough and strong as the red deer’s shanks are—was shattered into minute fragments the size of dice, The bone was again fractured at its lower part, and the thick skin entirely — lacerated through. The large sinews at the back of the bone, as well as the wire-like sinews that work the toes of the foot, were elongated and pulled out, and in fact everything was broken right off except two very slender sinews and a small portion of the skin. The total length of the portion of the deer’s leg caught in the tree was seven- teen inches; from the fracture to where it was torn off, eight inches. The leg was caught by the branches of the tree about four feet from the ground, and the lowest boughs carrying leaves were about nine feet from the ground. The deer was dead, and it is not known how long he had been held a prisoner by his foot. As there were no eye-witnesses of the occurrence, it becomes somewhat difficult to account for this extraordinary event. It is probable, however, that in consequence of the weather the animal was short uf food, and that in his wanderings he had observed above his head something edible on the lower branches of the thorn tree, perhaps leaves, moss, or lichens, on which deer feed in snowy RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. 2uD weather ; or possibly some ivy, of which deer are very fond. There was some ivy on the tree about nine feet from the FIG. 3.—FORE-LEG OF THE STAG CAUGHT BY FORKED BRANCHES OF A THORN TREE. ground, and the forked branch which caught the deer’s leg was four feet from the ground, so that he could not 294 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A reach the leaves when standing onall-fours. He therefore probably raised himself upon his hind legs, and when stretuhing himself upwards and forwards, the hoofs of his hind legs slipped from under him ; or else, when letting himself down again, his right fore-leg slipped suddenly be- tween the forked branches of the tree, and was instantly held there tight. (See again Fig. 3.) The animal then probably began immediately to struggle, but the more he kicked and fought the tighter the wrist of his foot got wedged in; in fact, when the preparation was brought to me the foot was so tightly fixed into the notch of the tree that it could not have been more jammed if it had been hammered down, and then a long screw passed right through it. In his struggles to get loose (he was a fine, heavy stag, carrying antlers with thirteen points) the first thing that happened was the fracture of the leg-bone. This allowed the animal to fall on his back, from which position, of course, he could not rise. Terribly alarmed at what had happened to him, the poor stag then began to pull and tug at his captive leg, assisting himself to do so by means of his horns. In his frantic exertions to get free the stag a second time broke his leg, then the skin gave way, and lastly the large tendons. If his strength had lasted long enough to have ruptured the two small tendons it is pos- sible that he might have escaped, leaving his leg in the fork of the tree. The head of the poor beast was a little further round the tree than represented in the drawing, so that it would seem the unfortunate creature had tried to use the butt of the tree as a lever to wrench off the frac- tured part of his leg, and so escape with his life. He did not, unfortunately, succeed in the attempt. RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. 295 His Royal Highness, having been informed of the acci- dent, judiciously ordered the portion of the tree which held the foot to be sawn off bodily. He then kindly sent the whole thing to me, with the request that the foot should be preserved for him without being removed from the fork in which it had been so tightly jammed by the animal itself. ¢ This being a very difficult problem in the art of taxi- dermy, I first of all had a drawing made of it by Mr. Berjeau, and then sent for Mr. Keilich, whose name is well known as a talented stuffer of deer’s heads, lions, tigers, and, in fact, all the larger animals. By a most ingenious plan Mr. Keilich managed to prepare the stag’s foot, keeping it exactly in the position in which it was found ; it was then set up in a case and was forwarded to his Royal Highness at Cumberland Lodge, Windsor Park, as a unique specimen. I have been unable either by search or by questioning to find any record whatever of a similar accident having been known to occur toa red deer, or in fact any other kind of deer. The nearest approach to it is the case of ‘locked horns, which are not so very uncommon. Red deer in the fall of the year, as we know, are great fighters, and at that time their horns are more or less elastic. When the deer are fencing at each other the branches of the antlers are apt to slip and get fast knotted, as it were. In 1866 I examined a very fine pair of locked horns of the common American deer at Mr. Leadbeater’s establishment, then in Brewer Street. In the Royal College of Surgeons there are a pair of locked horns of the Canadian elk, found just as they are, the wolves having eaten up the elks 296 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A themselves. An instance of locked horns occurred at Up Park, Petersfield, in 1866, when two deer were found with their brow-antlers forcibly wedged together, hooking on as tight as steel springs. The keeper was sent for, and one of the hooked brow-antlers was sawn off, and the deer liberated. There is a preparation of this kind of locked horns in the new museum of the University of Oxford, and similar cases are not unknown to deer-stalkers and foresters in Scotland. If I recollect rightly, the late Lord of Lovat had a fine specimen in his collection. I have received several notes from correspondents on the above curious accident. One writes :— ‘I am sure many others have seen, as I have done, a fallow buck jumping a considerable height up into the boughs of a whitethorn bush, and tossing his antlers about among them, thereby bringing to the ground a lot of haws, on which he makes a pleasant repast; it seems almost certain that the poor stag was going through the same performance, and as he could jump higher than the fallow buck, his leg might be caught in his descent, without much blame to his sagacity or to the activity of his nature.’ Another tells me of a somewhat similar accident to a dingo at a station in Port Phillip, Australia, One of the shepherds killed a kangaroo at some distance from his hut, and to secure the carcass deposited it across the boughs of a gum tree, some six or seven feet from the ground. ‘From the base of this tree, and at a slight angle from the trunk, a good stiff sapling had sprung up. On visiting the spot the next day the shepherd was surprised to find ‘a wild dog jammed between the sapling and the tree, and - RED DEER IN WINDSOR PARK. 297 quite dead. It had evidently made a spring for the dead kangaroo, missed its aim, and slipped into the angle, the elasticity of the sapling holding it tightly by the middle. Neither of its feet touched the ground, but the bark of both tree and sapling had been gnawed away in every direction within reach of its ugly tusks. I have also been told of a curious accident to a pony in apark. In attempting to leap a wire fence, its foot became fixed between the upper and second wires, causing it to turn a complete somersault. Its neck was quite doubled, and death ensued in a few minutes, either from suffocation or a broken neck. A strange accident happened to old Fanny, the fishing mare (mentioned in a previous article), when she was a three-year-old. In the field where she then was, two trees grew very close to each other. She got her head. fast between them about eight feet from the ground, and was very nearly strangled before she was got out; the blocks from the mill had to be fetched to hoist her out bodily. She was fast for about an hour, the field being half a mile from the mill. Noone saw how she got fast, but it was sup- posed she had been trying to reach the leaves, or playing. A somewhat similar accident not unfrequently happens tobirds. Blackbirds and thrushes are sometimes found caught by the head in the forks of bramble bushes, the accident having occurred when the birds were fighting. At the Surrey Gardens a fine ostrich was once killed in the following curious way :—The bird got his head into the space between two wooden oak palings ; finding himself entangled, he gave a sudden kick, the effect of which was to pull his head right off, 298 REMARKABLE ACCIDENT TO A RED DEER. No man would have sympathised with me more in the examination of this singular accident to a royal stag than my late friend John Keast Lord, F.Z.S., Naturalist to the British North American Boundary Commission, who wrote one of the best books in the English language on the art of travel, namely, ‘ At Home in the Wilderness ’ (Hardwicke, 1867). Lord had twenty years’ experience as trapper, hunter, and naturalist, east and west of the Rocky Mountains. He tells a terrible story of a lumberer or woodcutter having been caught by the foot in a tree which he was splitting with wedges. The lumberer was standing on the log driving in wooden and iron wedges with his ponderous mallet. Lord writes :—‘ Soon a yawning crack opened along the log, and in a brief space it would have been in two, but by some mischance the man slipped, the wedge sprung instantly, and allowed the crack to close upon his foot. Having tried every means available to free himself, but in vain—shout- ing he knew to be useless, as there was no one within hail, and night was coming on, and he was well aware that the bitter cold of a northern winter must end his life long before any help could be reasonably anticipated—in his agony of mind and intensity of bodily suffering, with mad despair the poor fellow seized the axe, and ata single chop severed his leg from the imprisoned foot.’ He managed to crawl home, but unfortunately the accident proved fatal, as in the case of the deer. r % 299 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND, Francois LEcompTE, the late ‘keeper of the seals’ at the Zoological Gardens, was quite a noted character in his way. My first introduction to Lecompte was at Cremorne Gardens in 1866, where he had been engaged to exhibit a sea-bear which he had captured in South America, : The district along the east coast of South America, especially the coast of Patagonia, seems to be the head- quarters of the seal family, many of these being of gigantic size. The following is the history of the capture of this cele- brated seal, and of Lecompte’s début as tamer of sea- bears and sea-lions :— In 1862 some French sailors, wandering about the desolate and bleak shores near Cape Horn, came across the seal, or sea-bear, whose portrait I now give. After a great deal of manceuvring, one of the men, Lecompte, managed to get behind the seal, and catch hold of his hind flippers. The seal, of course, tried to turn and bite ; but his captor, by turning to the right or to the left, kept out of the way of his teeth. When the beast was a bit tired, the other sailors managed to get a stick into his mouth, and to tie it tight Lara os, Te % ‘SNACUVYN IVOIDOTIOOZ AHL LV ‘SVEd-VES AHLI—'P ‘DL LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND, 301 behind his head, so as to gag him. They then bound him up tightly with ropes, and slinging him between two oars, Lecompte and the sailors carried him to their ship, and then to Buenos Ayres. Lecompte conceived the idea of taming his captive, and for two whole years devoted himself entirely to this object, in which he at last perfectly succeeded, not, however, without great difficulty, for he bore to his grave marks of the seal’s teeth on almost every limb, and his right hand was quite crippled by a bite, in which the seal almost severed the muscles of the fore-arm ; in fact, the wound was so severe that the South American doctors, wanted to amputate his hand alto- gether. Notwithstanding the ferocity of his pet, Lecompte cultivated his intelligence, and the creature soon performed tricks which Lecompte, with true nationality, worked up into a little military episode. The sea-bear volunteered to goas a soldier to Mexico. He then passed through the forms of enlistment and drill, and finally fired a cannon. The sea-bear was exhibited in Belgium before he went to Cremorne. His dinner consisted of twenty-five pounds weight of fish daily. His habit was to sleep all night, and during the day when his master was not with him. He awoke at the slightest noise. He did not object to visitors, but was annoyed with ladies wearing white ribbons. Lecompte was next. engaged bya travelling menagerie. The affair did not pay, so they turned out Lecompte and his sea-bear into a field by the road-side. Here he was discovered by Mr. Bartlett, who purchased his sea~bear for the society, while he himself was made the keeper. 302 ' LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. _ When the sea-bear died, Lecompte was sent to the Falkland Islands, and he returned with another in August 1868. This was a female captured by Lecompte him- self. Tecompte’s great. triumph was his taming the sea- bear. The pas de deux with Lecompte and the sea~ bear, which took place on the chair in the middle of the pond at the end of the platform, is well known to the public, and the photographs of these performances will now become historical. If ever there was affection between animals and men, it was the mutual love that existed between the seals at the Gardens and Lecompte; nor do I think it was en- tirely cupboard love, though undoubtedly the basket of fish more or less influenced their ideas. He had names for his seals at the Gardens, and the seals knew their names—at least, Kate and Fanny did. Lecompte was most careful about fish-hooks; the fishermen who catch whiting, haddocks, &c., often cut off the snood and leave the hook in the fish, and unless he opened the fish to remove the hook, the seals would swallow hook and all, and would be nearly sure to die when the fish was digested, and the hook remained in the stomach. Lecompte’s abode was in a little house by the zebras. I frequently had lunch with him. He was a splendid cook. He once gave me a portion of a most savoury pie, which he assured me was a spécialité. It was very good, and I ate it; but when I came to know what the spécialité was, I vowed I never would lunch with Le- compte again without seeing the menu first. Pee FRE OTRAS OF LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 303 He took the greatest care of the little baby bladder- - nose seals, and also of the larger specimens of the bladder- nose which Captain Gray caught and presented to the Society. | In May 18731 received a message that two seals had arrived from Dundee for the Brighton Aquarium. I sent for Mr. Lawler from Brighton, and we both went to the docks to meet them. Wecalled at Jamrach’s on the road, to ask him to lend usa den to put them in. We found the seals on board the steamship ‘Anglia’ in the docks used by the Dundee ships. They were simply on deck, and only kept from going about the deck by two boards. They were pretty little things, very fat and chubby, pro- bably about six weeks old. They had been caught in the Arctic regions, and brought to Dundee by Captain Gre- ville, of the ship ‘Camperdown:’ there they were then transferred to the ‘ Anglia,’ and brought to London. We _ put them into a box, having cut holes in the top, and took them on a cab to London Bridge. I stopped at Billings- gate and bought 20 lbs. of live eels for them. They arrived at Brighton quite safely, and soon got accustomed to their new home; but there was some difficulty at first about their food, as they would not eat the eels or any- thing else. Mr. Bartlett, however, with his usual readi- ness, suggested a mode of feeding them which eventually proved a success. I had scarcely got these seals all right at Brighton, when I received a telegram from Captain Gray that he had caught a young bladder-nose seal for me, and that it would arrive in London at nine o’clock the next morning. Punctual to the time the van arrived from the 304 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND, railway. I found the little animal was in a kind of crate, evidently put together by a ship’s carpenter. The seal looked very seedy, tired, and cold, so I took him upstairs and put him before the fire, covered him over, and let him have a sleep for two hours. He would not, however, eat nor drink, although I tried him with live eels, milk, and water. In the course of the day Mr. Bartlett called, and offered to take charge of him; soI sent him up to the Gardens, where he was placed under the care of Le- compte. Finding he would not eat, Lecompte caught him by the flippers and attempted to get a portion of eel down his throat, but did not succeed. While Le- compte was holding him he made a terrible noise, some- thing between the cry of a child and the growling of a dog. He was only a baby, I should say about six weeks old; the teeth were not very large, but rather formidable; the eyes, which were black, were deeply sunk into the head; the bladder on the top of his nose was just visible ; his colour was a yellowish buff. He stayed a very long time under water, though so young; and when he brought his head to the surface of the water his countenance was very human, not unlike the face of a chubby-faced baby; and I can easily understand the origin of the story that seals were once human beings, namely, the Egyptians that were drowned in the Red Sea, and who were for further punishment converted into seals. The last long interview I had with Lecompte was when the sea-lions for the Brighton Aquarium arrived at Deptford, in October 1875. Lecompte assisted to pack LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 305 the seals at London Bridge Station. It was very in- teresting to hear Lecompte talk to the animals. They were very frightened and very travel-worn. ‘ Vous ne connaissez pas encore votre papa, mon petit. Restez tran- quil, mon cher. Vous avez faim? Je vous donnerai un poisson, voila.’ Lecompte on this occasion did not look a bit like Lecompte. Whenon duty inthe Gardens, he was generally dressed in a blue serge sailor’s dress. When he went with us to Brighton he had got himself up quite a swell; his handsome face and white beard made him look quite a gentleman, which he really was by nature. He was one of the best ‘talkers I ever knew; he would say the commonest things in the most funny manner, During the journey down the sea-lions cried nearly the whole way, and Lecompte tried to pacify them by paternal exhortations in French: ‘Ah! vous criez aprés votre papa, mes chers phoces.’ Lecompte remained two or three days at the Brighton Aquarium, in order to reconcile the seals to their new home, where they long flourished. The sea- lions of the species exhibited at Brighton inhabit islands off the coast of San Francisco; their characteristic form is shown in the engraving on the next page. Lecompte originally was a French man-o’-war’s-man. He gained, by his welcome ‘ Bon jour, Monsieur,’ and his polite conduct, the respect of all visitors to the Gardens. His loss was greatly felt, not only by ‘mes pauvres bétes,’ but also by the public in general. So anxious was he for the welfare of his seals, that he requested when very ill to be taken to see them once more. During his illness he received his full pay, and was attended by the first medical men in London. Peace to the memory of Mm *"WAIaVNOV NOLHYIGTG AHL LV SNOII-VAS AHI—'G “DIK ———— S = ee => ae = ere a= —_—> Se i il a LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 307 this faithful servant and sincere friend of dumb animals— dumb in the ordinary sense of the word to most people, but possessing a voice and language well understood by their much-lamented master, Fran¢ois Lecompte. I received from the Rev. Mr. Lory, of the Falkland Islands, the skull of a large sea-lion, now in my Museum. It weighs eleven pounds, and measures from nose to the end of the skull fifteen inches: it has evidently been ex- posed to the action of the weather for a considerable time —may be for many years. The skin remains over the anterior half of the skull; the rest of the bone is bleached by the weather. The teeth are exceedingly beautiful, the largest being larger than the canine teeth of a lion, only not so pointed. Mr. Lory wrote me thus :—‘ The sea-lion’s head I have sent to you for your Museum is from Port Stephens, in the West Falkland Islands. The sea-lion is one of the hair seals (the male); his mane is thick and bushy, and his roar terrific. He measures from twelve feet to thirteen feet in length, and sometimes more. During the breeding season he is exceedingly fierce, and will attack a man; at other times he avoids him. A parishioner of mine named White had his thigh severely lacerated by one. The wound bled profusely, but from good attention he recovered, only to meet with a watery grave afterwards. They breed on the north coast of the East Falkland Islands, and in the Jasons; and during the season the lions keep jealous guard over the females, which are quiet, inoffensive animals. The captain of a schooner in the Falklands told me that he and his men suddenly came upon from eighty to a hundred of these monsters in the Jasons, which immediately made for the Xe, ~ 308 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. water; and as the men intercepted their path they were obliged to defend themselves as well as they could with their clubs. The rush was tremendous, but the lions were more frightened than the men, who, as you may suppose, were rather taken aback by such an unlooked-for recep- tion on a desolate island. Sea-lions are not easily killed by a club ; indeed, I believe the usual way of killing them is to shoot them with ball cartridge.’ Dr. Murie, author of the most scientific monograph on sea-lions that has ever been published, wrote me as to this specimen :—‘ Your. specimen is undoubtedly an old male; the changes in appearance from the younger to the older stages, and the differences between the male and the female, are very curious. There are, so to say, five grades of development. First, the brain region in the baby is preponderant. Second, the face begins to lengthen. Third, the teeth acquire importance; and in this stage sexual distinction becomes evident in the skull, although there is still a considerable resemblance between them. Fourth, notably differs from the preceding, the bones becoming more massive and rugose, sexual character- istics being marked; crests then rise. Fifth, as the skull ripens to old age, particularly in the male, all the characteristic points of the fourth stage are carried out by excessive growth of processes, crests, and other superficial developments of bony lines, spicules, and nodules. The cavity of the eye looks forwards; the space behind for the temporal and other jaw muscles enlarging as fleshy bulk preponderates over brain character. ‘It follows that all the aforesaid changes are an exact counterpart of what obtains in the gorilla. In early . | | | | LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. 309 youth the brain is functionally predominant. The teeth assume importance, with a corresponding facial accession. Lastly, whereas brain enlargement is apparently arrested, the muscles of mastication, those of the throat and neck, indeed, all connected with the head, and_ therefore involved in the organs of offence and defence, paramountly swell in bulk and strength; nerves and_blood-vessels augment proportionally. Thus, from the featureless skull of the young is evolved the rugged, immense, brutal, and terrible-looking sea carnivore, peculiar to the male of this and certain other genera of the eared seals. ‘The animal to which your skull belonged is not the elephant seal (Morunga), and is a very different animal from those exhibiting at Brighton, but belongs to the same species (Otaria Jubata) as the earlier specimen and some of the later ones which the Zoological Society possess.’ In 1875 Mr. John Willis Clarke gave a lecture at the Zoological Gardens on Sea-lions.! He says concerning the species to which this skull belongs :—‘ The canines are of enormous size, and the two outermost incisors of the upper jaw only a trifle smaller, so that when the jaw is closed, and the lower canines fall between these two enormous teeth, anything that may happen to come between them is held as in a vice. The molar teeth are so solid that sailors have mistaken them for flints. A quantity of pebbles are always found in their stomachs. The sea-lion is covered all over with coarse stiff hair. Under the lower jaw and on the back of the head and neck it is rough and shaggy. Beneath this hair is a crop ' Contemporary Review, December 1875, 310 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. of under fur, distributed in delicate, short, fine hairs. Old males develop a mane. The skulls, which are picked up on the shore of the Falklands, are sometimes half as large again as those of the largest living sea-lion. The male does not attain his size until he is about six years old. There are nine well-authenticated species of sea-lions. In the North Pacific three, viz. Otarva ursina, O. Gillespu, and O. Stelleri. Inthe South Pacifie two—O. Jubata and O. Falklandica. At the Cape of Good Hope, O. Pusilla or Antarctica. On the coasts of Australia and New Zealand, O. Hookeri and O. Lobata. At Kerguelen’s Island, O. Gazella.’ The sea-lion, to which when alive the skull sent me by the Rev. Mr. Lory belonged, must have been indeed a gigantic creature, possibly as big as a moderate-sized horse. Allied to these huge seals, but excelling nearly all of them in bulk, is the walrus (Zrichecus rosmarus), a denizen of the Arctic regions, remarkable for its great tusks and bristly whiskers. The males are twelve to fif- teen feet in length. The illustration of the walrus, and those of the sea-bear and sea-lion, show three of the most characteristic of the seal tribe. It is not often that the walrus comes down so far south as the coast of Scotland. The following notice from a correspondent, therefore, is worthy of record:—‘I have heard, to my great surprise, that a gentleman of undoubted credibility and intelligence had during last summer seen off the west coast of the Isle of Skye a large walrus. Having occasion to visit the island, I was fortunate enough to meet the gentleman who (with two friends) saw the animal, and had the account direct from himself. a ‘SOUIVM FHHL—'9 ‘D1 312 LECOMPTE, THE SEALS’ FRIEND. The date of the walrus’s visit to Skye was, so far as my friend could remember, about the 20th of June 1878. He was seen lying on a rock near the shore on a fine calm evening, and my informant and his friends were able to get near enough to remove all doubt as to the identity of the animal, with which they were familiar from plates or stuffed specimens. The huge tusks were quite easily distinguished, and the length of the animal was estimated at about seven feet. On being disturbed he rolled over into the sea, swam a short distance to another rock, and clambered on to it, apparently using his tusks to aid him in doing so. After some little time he took the water again and was seen no more.’ eet SR ORME IRC iy cas 313 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. THERE is something very attractive to the human mind, whether educated or not, about the word ‘ Whale.’ It may be that man, knowing his own inferiority of size and strength as compared to many gigantic animals living either on the earth or in the water, and also on the ommne ignotum pro magnifico principle, looks upon the whale as the very embodiment of size and strength. Again, it is not impossible that our earlier impressions of Divine power may have been obtained from whales being so fre- quently mentioned in the Bible, especially in Gen. i., in which whales are the first created animals mentioned by name, thus—‘ And God created great whales.’ Then, again, everybody knows the story of Jonah :—‘ Now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah, and Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.’ On turning to Johnson’s Dictionary we find evi- dence that in his day the science of natural history had not very much advanced, for the learned lexicographer defines a whale as ‘The largest of fish; the largest of animals that inhabit this globe.’ Whales are of the highest interest to the public—not only in a scientific point of view, but also because their value is of commercial importance to this nation. In former 314 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. times, with the exception of the celebrated Scoresby, but few persons placed on record anything relating to the ~ structure and habits of these huge oceanic mammalia ; and even now a great field of inquiry is open to those whose duty it is to hunt the leviathan of the deep amid the icebergs and frozen seas of the Arctic Ocean. I am proud of the friendship of a gentleman who has of late years done more than any other person to give the public information relative to the fauna of the far-distant North—the whales and the seals. This gentleman has spent twenty-two whaling seasons at the North Pole, and each time he has returned from his perilous voyages he has brought us back some interesting news from his hunt- ing-grounds. I need hardly say that I refer to Captain David Gray, of the steam whaling-ship ‘ Eclipse,’ of Peter- head, Aberdeenshire. In the course of one of his recent voyages Captain Gray has made a discovery relative to the structure of the baleen or whalebone whale (Balena mysticetus), and to its mode of feeding, which to the best of my belief has hitherto been entirely unknown, and which will doubtless excite great interest among all naturalists. The following is Captain Gray’s description of the head of a Greenland whale, with sketches and measurements taken during his voyage in 1876, showing the manner in which the whalebone is arranged in the head :-— ‘Fig. 7 shows the mouth open, and the position of the whalebone when the animal is feeding; it is drawn to scale, and is a good representation of its appearance. It will be noticed that I have not filled in the correct number of slips of whalebone, which amount to about 300 on each ‘avel IaMoy ‘ad | 9UOG-UMOID “VY ‘NGdO HLOOW ‘YNIGHAd SI CIVHM GAL NOHM GNOQAIVHM FHL JO NOILISOd—) “DIA 316 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. side of the head, but have only drawn a few lines showing the direction they take towards the lower jaw when the mouth is open. I counted the number of blades of whale- bone in a whale’s head last voyage, and found 286 on the left and 289 on the right side of the head. ‘Along the middle of the crown-bone the blades of whalebone are separated from each other by three-quarters of an inch of gum, but the interval decreases, towards the nose and throat, to a quarter of an inch. The gum is always white; in substance it resembles the hoof of a horse, but is softer. It is easily cut with a knife, or broken by the hand, and is tasteless. ‘The whalebone representing the palate is lined inside with hair, for the purpose of covering the spaces between the slips, and preventing the food on which the whale subsists from escaping; this hair is short at the roof of the mouth, but is from twelve to twenty inches long at the points of the whalebone. The reason of this is that when the mouth is opened the bone springs forward, and the spaces between the slips are greatest at the points. ‘ Hitherto it was believed that the whalebone had room to hang perpendicularly from the roof of the mouth to the lower jaw when the mouth was shut, but such is not the case. The whalebone is arranged, as will be seen from the sketch, to reach from the upper to the lower jaw when the mouth is open; were it otherwise, the whale would not be able to catch its food; it would all escape underneath the points of the whalebone. ‘ Fig. 8 shows the position of the whalebone when the mouth is shut. The dotted lines show the jaw-bone, and the black lines show the whalebone curving towards the “mel IaMoy ‘a& £ aUOG-UAOLO “V é SULVId HHL ‘LAHS AIVHAM JO HLOAOW—'8 “OIA a “MVE YAMOT AHL JO NOILOV AHL Ad AVMV GuaMoVd ANOGAIVHM AO ‘ 318 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. throat. It is not very correctly drawn, but it will be sufficient to show the arrangement which allows room in a cavity or hollow in the lower jaw for the points of the whalebone to lie in when the mouth is shut. The whale has no muscular power over its whalebone, any more than other animals have over their teeth. When the animal opens its mouth to feed, the whalebone springs forward and downward, so as to fill the mouth entirely ; when in the act of shutting it again, the whalebone being Fig. 9.—SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH SHUT. C, crown-bone; G, gum; WB, whalebone; T, tongue; L, lips; JB, jaw-bone; J, lower jaw. pointed slightly towards the throat, the lower jaw catches it and carries it up into the hollow befure described. ‘Fig. 9 is a cross section cut halfway between the blow-holes and the nose along the line aB, showing the mouth shut, and the arrangement of the lips, jaw-bones, tongue, and whalebone. It will be best understood ‘by looking at the explanation given with the drawing. ‘Fig. 10 is the same section showing the mouth open. It conveys a good idea of the great capacity of the mouth STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 319 when open compared with the comparatively small space _it has to hold the whalebone in when the mouth is shut. FiG. 10.—SECTION OF WHALE’S MOUTH WHEN OPEN, ‘Fig. 11 is the whale that these measurements were taken from, drawn by a lady, and is the best representa- tion of the Balena mysticetus that I have ever seen.’ The dimensions were as follows :— ft. in, Length from nose to tail welt <0 Length of head from nose to eye . hall icon Bs) Breadth of body between the fins . , ae clest) Breadth of head across the jaw-bones . foe ad Breadth of lip, including jaw-bone ; wie Gape . , ‘ ' é eee Cine Breadth of tail . : ; pene Length of whalebone . ; ercherna! A i ten. yt “peaytojog ,‘osdrpog , drys oy3 jo ‘Kvay pravq ureydep Aq portry SVES GNVINEAAD AHL AO (snza0ushw vuxppg) AIVHM ANOGHIVHM— TI ‘DIT STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 321 - The problem hitherto unsolved has been the exact manner in which the whale works his plates of baleen. The result was known, but not the modus operandi. This is the discovery made by Captain Gray. From his paper and diagrams it will beceme evident that when the whale is at work catching his food in the sieve-like, hair-lined mouth, the baleen is extended to its full length along the whole row of the plates. In pictures of whales, the beast is always depicted with an open mouth, but surely the whale does not always keep his mouth open! But then the question comes, how does he shut it? and when he shuts it, what does, he do with his baleen? How does he pack it away? Gray, after careful examination of many whales, has found out how this is done. When the whale closes his lower jaw, he first gently pushes backwards and upwards towards the palate the anterior plates of baleen ; the posterior plates go back under pressure in succession, till all the plates of baleen lie back in the mouth, packed beautifully in regular order, one over the other, over the angle of the eye. The bundle of hairs from the tips of the plates of baleen fit into a hollow at the edge of the jaws. I have not the least hesitation in stating that the description of the mode in which the whale packs away his baleen when he wishes to close his mouth is entirely new to the scientific world; and I challenge all comers to account for this wondrous mechanism by the doctrine of development or self-evolution. No; itis a proof—a new proof, at the head ofa long catalogue of other evidences, ab- solutely unerring and true—that the structures of animals are not due to the causes which this doctrine would assign MS 322 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. to them, but to the omniscience of Him who on the fifth day of the Creation completed a wondrous work:—‘ And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind: and God saw that it was good.’ On hearing of this discovery Professor Flower wrote as follows :— »* Captain David Gray’s observations upon the position of the whalebone in the mouth of the Greenland whale are quite novel, and of great interest. .They arose, as the captain tells me in a letter just received, in conse- quence of a conversation which ‘we had together a few years ago, while looking at the skeleton of the large whale — mounted in the Museum of the College of Surgeons. I asked if he could explain what had always been to me, as to others who have never had Captain Gray’s opportunities of observation, a great puzzle, viz. how it was that the whalebone was so much longer than the space which it occupied in the animal’s mouth, supposing the blades to be placed, as usually represented, at right angles with the long. axis of the jaws. This difficulty occurred in looking at all the authentic figures, such as Scoresby’s, in which the height of the head is far too small for the length assigned to the whalebone on the supposition stated above, and equally in looking at the actual bony framework of the head. Captain Gray’s explanation that the slender ends of the whalebone blades fold backwards when the mouth is shut, the longer ones from the middle of the jaw falling into the hollow formed by the shortness of the blades behind them, as seen in the side view, is perfectly clear and satisfactory. It shows, moreover, how, STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES, 323 whether the mouth is shut or open, or in any intermediate position, the lateral spaces between the upper and lower jaw are always kept filled up by the marvellously con- structed hair-sieve or strainer, which thus adapts itself to _ the varying condition of the parts between which it is, as it were, stretched across. If the whalebone had been rigid, and depending perpendicularly from the upper jaw, when the mouth was open a space would have been left between the tips of the whalebone forming the lower edge of the strainer, which, as Captain Gray justly remarks, would completely interfere with its use, although the stiff wall- like lower lip, closing in the sides of the mouth below, might have the effect of remedying snch a contingency to a certain extent; at least, it would do so if the whalebone were short and firm asin the Finners. The function of this great lip in supporting the slender and flexible lower _ ends of the blades of the Greenland whale, and preventing them being driven outwards by the flow of water from within when the animal is closing its mouth, is evident from Captain Gray’s drawings and explanation. The whole appa- ratus is a most perfect piece of animal mechanism. ‘Captain Gray’s evidently truthful drawing of the Green- land right whale is an acquisition to science. What is, how- ever, really wanted to convey an impressive idea of the huge size and extraordinary conformation of this animal is an accurately prepared model of life size, constructed under the direction of one as conversant with its appearance as Captain Gray. Mr. Buckland has shown by his invaluable casts of the smaller Cetacea the best way of exhibiting the external appearance of such animals. It is greatly to be wished that they, or similar specimens, may some day x 2 324 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. find their way into the National Museum of Natural His- tory,and may be supplemented by the more colossal species, as the sperm, Greenland, and great fin-backed whales. We have done all that we can with the space at our dis- posal at the College of Surgeons, in exhibiting skeletons of them and many of the smaller species of this most interesting order of animals; we must look to the new museum at South Kensington to do the rest.’ The mechanism of the whale is admirably suited for the conditions in which he is destined by the Creator to live. He wears a great-coat several inches thick—literally wm his skin ; that is to say, the cuticle, or scarf-skin, is very thin and highly polished, like a well-polished boot ; the skin itself consists of cells, which are filled up with fat. This fat, unfortunately for Mr. Whale, is very valuable, not only for burning purposes, but also for dressing jute, a flax-like material, which, when dressed with oil, assumes a lustre not unlike silk. With this jute are made carpets, curtains, and ladies’ chignons. Jute is also used in the adulteration of black silk dresses. Ladies who are pur- chasing black silk dresses can detect the presence of jute by burning. If the fibre is true silk, being animal, the smell will be of burning animal substance; if it be vege- table, the scent of the burning material will be something like that. of burning cotton. The whale has apparently neither arms nor legs: but his two front fins are not fins, they are hands; if the skin be dissected off they will be found to contain five regular fingers, all in one case—imagine the human hand ina hedge-cutter’s glove, and you have the model of the STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 325 whale’s paw. He does not use these paws for prehension or touch, nor, I believe, at all for swimming; they simply act to balance his weight in the water, and assist him in steering himself. We now come to his tail. Among nature’s beautiful works three mechanical forces may. be said to take pre- eminence: firstly, the stroke of a lion’s paw; secondly, the kick of a giraffe; and thirdly, the stroke of a whale’s tail. The whale’s tail is not only its sole weapon for defence, but is its chief organ of motion. It is stated that whales can go through the water at the pace of twenty- five to thirty miles to the hour. The least of these speeds would send them six hundred miles a day, or from 60° north lat: to 60° south lat. in twelve days. Though the usual colour of the whale on the upper part is shiny black, the fore-part of the body underneath and part of the lower lip are pure white, and the under part towards the tail, slate or lead coloured. I do not quite understand why the right whale should wear a black coat when he has to bear a temperature of such intense cold. His cousin, the beluga, wears a white coat. Here, then, is a problem to be solved; but depend upon it there is a good reason for the diversity of colour in these two whales’ coats. The whale is a capital diver, but the time occupied in his diving depends upon his business, whether feeding, playing, or travelling. He is said seldom to remain at the surface to blow longer than ten minutes, during which period he blows eight or nine times; he then descends for five to ten minutes; sometimes, when getting his dinner, for fifteen or twenty minutes; when harpooned he will stay under water fifty minutes. 326 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. ‘When whales are harpooned,’ Captain Gray writes, ‘and there is no close ice in the immediate neighbourhood that they can go to for protection, their usual custom is to dive until they reach the bottom. They seldom go beyond a depth of seven hundred fathoms, and remain under water on an average fifty minutes, appearing again near the same place where they were harpooned. They then fall an easy prey to their pursuers, being so much exhausted from dragging such a weight of line, and by the great pressure they have been subjected to so far below the surface. ‘Should a whale escape, and be again harpooned, it never commits the same mistake, no matter how many years may have elapsed ; it always sets off as fast as it ean go along the surface, and is very difficult to take, often tearing the harpoon out of the blubber, or breaking the Jines. Scoresby says that “a whale’s brain is only equal in proportion to the three-thousandth part of its body,” but they have a very good memory nevertheless.’ Constituted as are the lungs of human beings, it is im- possible for men to stay with impunity very long under water, but in a lung-breathing animal, such as the whale, we find a wonderful provision for the storing of the blood. At the back of the lungs, between them and the ribs, is a vast plexus of blood-vessels, which retain the blood when the beast is under water, and cannot or is afraid to come up to breathe. In our own veins there are very complicated and beautiful valves, well worthy the attention of engineers who have hydraulic works to manage. Professor Owen first pointed out that the veins in the whale are remark- able not only for their capacity, but above all for the STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. = 327 almost total absence of valves. The fact is of the utmost importance to whalers, inasmuch as it enables them, with such comparatively small weapons as the harpoon and lance, to kill such an enormously large animal as a whale. ‘The non-valvular structure of the veins in the Cetacea,’ says Professor Owen, ‘and the pressure of sea-water at the depths to which they retreat when harpooned, explain the profuse and deadly hzmorrhage that follows a wound, which in other Mammalia would be by no means fatal.’ As an instance of the ease with which whales are some- times killed, Captain Gray thus relates the capture of one :—‘ It was struck close to the ship during a thick fog witha strong gale of wind blowing, and surrounded by aclose and heavy pack ; a more unfavourable state of matters could hardly be. The whale took out seven lines, or eight hundred and forty fathoms, and stopped taking any more. The lines were made fast on board, and allowed to hang for ten hours before commencing to haul them in. At the end of them was a whale of the largest size, and all that was holding her was a single wire, one-eighth of an inch in diameter.’ On the other hand, the immense power of the whale is sometimes exerted with fearful effect. To show the great strength of a full-grown whale, I will quote the following description of the capture of a big whale by Captain Gray and one of his crews :— ‘We were at the time nearly close beset, there being only a small space of water at the floe edge ; many whales were passing through it. One of them was harpooned, and went off so fast that the harpooner failed to get a turn of the lines round the bullet-head before the boat s lines were all run out. The bullet-head is an oak post 328 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. placed in the bow of the boat, on to which three or more turns of the line are put to help to drag the whale. The “second boat’s lines soon followed, but a very heavy strain was kept upon them. Two boats’ lines were then attached to the end of the lines run out, so as to hang a heavier strain. ‘They were also taken out, and other two boats bent on their lines, and the boats’ bows lashed up to the ice to prevent them from being dragged under. One more line was taken out from each of the last boats, equal to two and a half miles. ‘The whale by this time had reached the other side of the fioe. Men were sent over the ice with lances, and succeeded in killing him; but before he gave in he broke the lines in the dying struggle. Fortunately for us, it was the line nearest the whale that gave way.. He proved a valuable prize; his blubber measured twenty-two inches thick along the back.’ The bones of the whale are very peculiar. They are neither hollow, as birds’ bones, nor marrow-containing, as our own bones, but composed of a series of cells. These cells are very porous, and contain more or less oil. Ina section which 1 have lately made of a whale’s arm-bone, the structure is well demonstrated, especially the binding up, as it were, of this cellular bone structure with an ex- ternal coating of bone as solid as that forming the leg-bone of anox. J understand from Captain Gray that the bones from the whales killed are in no way utilised, the reason being, I suppose, want of space on board ship. — There is one bone, however, in the whale which is of exceeding hardness; this is the ear-bone. Now, it isa very remarkable thing that the whale should be in all senses so STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 329 strictly mammalian except as to one point, and that is the ear. The reader should look in the head of the next cod, haddock, or other fish he has for dinner, and he will find two very hard ivory-like bones. These bones are the hearing bones of the fish. The fish hear by means of vibration in the water. The whale also lives in the water, and therefore, by a most beautiful adaptation of means to ends, though purely mammalian, he has, under the special conditions of his existence, the ear-bones of a fish. These ear-bones are not unfrequently found fossil in Suffolk. They are called ceteolites. When a huntsman goes in pursuit of an animal, he must of necessity acquaint himself with the machinery of offence, defence, or escape, with which the animal he is in pursuit of is endowed. The whale, as I have men- tioned, has great powers of hearing. These poor perse- cuted brutes doubtless by this time have found out that whaling-ships are their deadly enemies, and keep a sharp look-out. The vibrations caused by the screw of a steamer would of necessity be heard through water by the whale at a great distance; therefore it is advisable, if it is desired to get near the whales, to take up the screw and use the sails only. | It is the law of nature that all Mammalia should have seven vertebre in the neck. A giraffe has a very long neck, to enable him to pull down the lower branches of the palm- trees on which he feeds, but he has only seven cervical vertebre. The whale is also mammalian, therefore he must have seven cervical vertebrae, and so we find he has. When seen in the carcass the whale seems to have no neck; he has not the same necessity as land animals 330 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. for moving the neck, but, for all that, he requires neck- bones of some kind. We find, therefore, that the seven cervical vertebrae are flattened—in porpoises very much flattened—and appear like seven penny pieces soldered together. I have a beautiful preparation in my museum to show this. The question now arises, what is to form the food of this marine monster? The problem is difficult, because not only must the animal feed, but he must actually lay up fat; therefore his food must of necessity be abundant ; but think what kind of food is likely to be abundant in the frozen or freezing seas. We find, in fact, the largest animal in creation preying, it may be almost said, on the smallest animal in creation. The sea in these parts is sometimes so filled with immense multitudes of small animalcula dispersed through it, that they colour the water of a greenish or brown hue. The principal food of the Greenland whale consists of a small crustacean not larger than the common house-fly, which lives on these animalcula, and which is found in greatest abun- dance when the temperature of the sea is from 34° to 35°. The ordinary temperature of the sea amongst ice is 29°. The colour of the water varies from dark brown to olive- green and clear blue, the blue water being the coldest. These little Crustacea are transparent, and the con- tents of their stomachs can easily be seen to be dark brown or green, as the case may be, giving the like colour to the sea. Captain Gray tells me that oil can be extracted by properly treating this whale’s food. Is it not wonderful that the oil should be as it were already in minute é eee ee STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 331 animated drops, so that the whale can easily assimilate them, and fill up the cells of his skin with a vast quantity of oil? a good whale of fifty-two feet being capable of yielding, when boiled down, twenty tons of oil. We have already seen how the whale is to catch these animated oil globules which form its food. Teeth would not be of the least use to him. The only thing to be of use would be a sieve. Aristotle first remarked this fact. ‘ Mysticetus etiam pilas in ore intus habet vice dentiwm swis setrs similes ’—* The whale has hairs in his mouth instead of teeth, like the hairs of a pig.’ On this Professor Owen - remarks :—‘ To a, person looking into the mouth of a stranded whale, the concavity of the palates would appear to be beset with coarse hair. The species of Balenoptera which frequents the Mediterranean might have afforded to the father of natural history the subject of his philo- sophical comparison.’ Captain Gray thus describes the movements of whales when feeding :—‘ When the food is near the surface, they usually choose a space between two pieces of ice, from three to four hundred yards apart, which whalers term their beat, and swim backwards and forwards until they are satisfied, or the food is exhausted. They often go with the point of their nose so near the surface that the water can be seen running over it, just as it does over a stone in a shallow stream; they turn round before coming to the - surface to blow, and lie for a short time to swallow the food before going away for another mouthful. They often continue feeding in this way for hours, on and off, after- wards disappearing under the nearest floe, sleeping pro- bably under the ice, and coming out again when ready for 332 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. another meal. In no other way can their sudden reap- pearance at the same place be accounted for. ‘Very often the food lies from ten to fifteen fathoms below the surface of the water. In this case the whales’ movemeuts are quite different. After feeding, they come to the surface to breathe and lie still for a minute. One can easily see the effort they make when swallowing. They then raise their heads partially out of the water, and dive down again, throwing their tails up in the air every time they disappear. Their course below the water can often be traced from their eddy. This is caused by the movement of the tail, which has the effect of smoothing the water in circles immediately bebind them. ‘More whales have been caught when feeding in this way than in any other; they lie longer on the surface, and generally head the same way every time they appear. This is very important to whale-fishers, because whales must be approached tail-on to give any certainty of getting near enough to have a chance of harpooning them, and the harpooner has a better idea where to piace his boat to be in readiness to pull on to them whenever they come to the surface. — ‘Like all the other inhabitants of the sea, whales are affected by the tides, being most numerous at the full » and new moon, beginning to appear three days before, and disappearing entirely three days after, the change. Often this will go on for months with the utmost regularity, unless some great change in the ice takes place, such as the floes breaking up or the ice being driven off the ground ; in either case they will at once disappear. ‘No doubt whales are seen and often taken at any time te ae |) i ee ee UE Le STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 333 of the tides; but if a herd is hunted systematically, and they are attached to a particular feeding bank, this is their usual habit. This peculiarity in their habits cannot be easily accounted for; their food is as abundant during the neap as it is in the spring tides.’ I have some very fine specimens, showing the struc- ture of the baleen, in my museum at South Kensington. The longest slip of baleen is no less than 13 ft. 2 in. in length and 9 in. in width. This must have been taken from a magnificent animal. Two other very fine slips of baleen measure respectively 9 ft. 3 in. by 8Lin. The mode of the progressive growth of the baleen is a modification of the design adopted in the tooth of the rabbit or the tusk of the elephant. The baleen is wrongly called whalebone. It certainly comes out of the whale, but there is no bone whatever in its composition. It is com- posed of hardened hair. The horn of the rhinoceros is also composed of hairs matted, as it were, together into a solid horn. The hairs of the baleen are united one to the other by a kind of animal glue. By boiling and hammer- | ing I find the baleen can be reduced to a state of hair. The great anatomist and founder of the Royal College of Surgeons was the first to describe the wonderful mechanism of the growth of the baleen. I shall quote the words of this great man :—‘ The plates of the baleen are formed upon a vascular substance not immediately adhering to the lower jaw-bone, but having a more dense substance between, which is also vascular. This substance, which may be called the nidus of the whalebone, sends out thin, broad prongs answering to each plate, on which the plate is formed, as the cock’s spur or the bull’s horn 354 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. on the bony core, or a tooth on its pulp, so that each plate is necessarily hollow at its growing end, and the first part of the growth taking place on tbe inside of the hollow, &c.’? The whole passage is too long to quote, but the process of growth may be thus illustrated: —Take an envelope, gum it up, place it on one end, cut off the other edge with scissors, gently squeeze it till it opens a little, imagine the open part of the envelope to be filled with a soft gluey material, and that this material gradually hardens into baleen as it descends, till at last it is a solid plate of baleen, 2.¢. the uncut edge of the envelope. When at Peterhead I inspected Captain Gray’s store- house of whalebone. The whalebone, as taken from the whale, is piled up against the wall; it is then placed in a large vat containing hot water, and the rough outside is cleaned off by women. JI was much struck to find how very soft and elastic whalebone is when wet. I expect that when it is in the whale’s mouth it is very pliable, and, in fact, little more than hardened gum. Rats are very fond of whalebone. We pulled down the stacks of whalebone, and Gray was much annoyed to find the rats had gnawed at and spoiled some of the very best pieces. Gray tells me that a whale’s age can be ascertained by the growth on the bone each year being shown by a well-marked succession of growth, somewhat like the rings in timber. The eye of a living whale has a very comical look about it; it has eyelids which open and shut. It is placed very low down in the body (see illustration, p. 320). Captain Gray has seen a whale come up from the bottom, turn on his side, take a good look at the ship, and then go downagain. He thinks the whales go under the ice to sleep. STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 335 The following are the dimensions of two of the whales of the last voyage :—A bull whale forty-eight feet from nose to tail; nose to the eye, seventeen feet; breadth across the head, eight feet ten inches; gape, nine feet. Another bull whale: total length, forty-seven feet ; head, seventeen feet eight inches; body between the fins, eleven feet; breadth of head, nine feet three inches. At the Peterhead Museum there is a lovely specimen of a foetal whale about thirty inches long; this little baby whale is the prettiest thing I have seen for many a day. From examining the specimens at Peterhead I think I discovered an indentation on the nose that proved that sucking whales have whiskers. In a porpoise just born I discovered three hairs on one side of the snout and two on the other. They were very slightly attached to the skin, and of a pinkish colour. The whales suckle their young with milk. Whale’s milk sounds very like pigeon’s milk. I well recollect my father, the Dean, telling a story of old Mr. Clift, of the College of Surgeons, going down to dissect a whale somewhere at the mouth of the Thames, and coming back with a quantity of whale’s milk, from which he obtained cream, and subsequently butter. John Hunter (my great ideal) never tasted whale’s milk, but he writes: —‘ Whale’s milk is probably very rich, for in that caught near Berkeley with its young, the milk, which was tasted by Mr. Jenner and Mr. Ludlow, surgeon at Sodbury, was rich, like a cow’s milk to which cream had been added.’ He then goes on to describe the milk-secreting glands, ‘situated on each side of the middle line of the abdomen ' at the lower part; they are flat bodies lying between the external layer of fat and abdominal muscles. They are 336 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. there that they may not vary the external shape of the animal, and the trunk is large and appears to act as a reservoir for the milk.’ The young whales are said to suck for at least a year. The mother is very affectionate to them. The yearling whales are called ‘ shortheads,’ because the plates of baleen are almost rudimental. JI imagine that as he is sucking he does not require to feed on the ordinary food, just in the same way as a sucking human baby has no teeth, the baby teeth gradually appearing as the time for its requiring solid food progresses. When two years old, and weaned, young whales are naturally thin. They are then called ‘stunts.’ A great many charity children are stunts (who ever saw a fat charity child?). When they have attained their full size they are called ‘ schull- fish.’ The following extract regarding the size of the whales is from Scoresby’s ‘ Voyage to Greenland,’ chap. vi., page 49 :— ‘ This whale, though a “ sucker,” was 19 feet in length, and 14 feet 5 inches in circumference at the thickest part of the body. The external skin on the body was an inch and three-quarters thick, being about twice the thickness of the same membranes in a full-grown animal. The blubber was, on an average, five inches in thickness; the largest of the whalebone measured only twelve inches, about one-half of which was imbedded in the gums. The external part of these fringes, not exceeding six inches in length, did not seem sufficient to enable the little whale yet to catch, by filtration out of the sea, the shrimps and other insects on which the animal in a more advanced . : at aa ars _ STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 337 stage is dependent for its nourishment. Maternal assist- ance and protection appeared, therefore, to have been essential for its support. ‘The muscles about the neck, appropriated to the movements of the jaws, formed a bed, if extended, of nearly five feet broad, and a foot thick. The central part of the diaphragm was two inches in thickness. The two principal arteries in the neck were so large as to admit a man’s hand and arm. The general appearance of the brain is not unlike that of other Mammalia; but its smallness is remarkable. In this whale, of 11,200 pounds, or seventy times the weight of a man, tbe brain was only three pounds twelve ounces. Large as the whale is in bulk, the throat is but narrow. In this animal the diameter of the cesophagus, when fully distended, was scarcely 24 inches, with difficulty admitting my hand. The foregoing measurements and weight all refer to a sucking whale that at the time of capture was under maternal protection.’ | In the Peterhead Museum there are some very inter- esting specimens of harpoons. There we see a harpoon taken from the back of a whale by the ship ‘ Active,’ June 30,.1863, supposed to have been in the whale’s back thirty-three years; and a harpoon with line attached, taken out of the back of a whale by the crew of the steamship ‘ Eclipse,’ July 1872 ; this harpoon had been in this whale since 1870. I have received (among several valuable specimens from the Arctic Seas) some very fine ‘ whale-lice.’ The Latin name of these curious parasites is Cyamus ceti, or Pow de la baleine of the French. When turned out Z 338 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. of the spirits of wine they dry up immediately, and show that they are of a horny substance: they are horrid- looking wretches, buff coloured. The largest is three- quarters of an inch long, and about the same in width. There are three legs on each side, and two legs which pro- ject from behind, like steering-oars. All these legs are armed with a claw. The two hind legs have the longest and strongest grappling-hooks. On placing a big claw under the microscope, I find it is crooked, at about the angle ofa fish-hook half unbent. The lower third of the claw is transparent, and has a point sharper than the sharpest sewing-needle ever turned out at Redditch. So sharp are these needle-pointed claws that I find if I apply the dead whale-louse to my cheek, the sharp claws take a firm hold on to the flesh. Even picked up they will stick firmly to the fingers. Each beast has two very minute black eyes, like specks, and the back appears armour-plated, not unlike the back of an armadillo. There are three females among the lot. They carry their eggs, the size of a large egg of an ant, in a sac under the posterior third of the body. Why do all these parasites breed so fast? These specimens were taken from a fair-sized whale ; the place where they were found was behind the pectoral fins, just where they join the body. It frequently happens that the lice congregate in patches as big as a plate all over the whale’s body, eating great holes into the skin of the unfor- tunate beast. The whale seems to suffer much from the persecution of these terrible sharp-clawed parasites, for he is often seen to jump clean out of the water, as though attempting to get rid of them. No jumping out of the water would unseat these sure-seated jockeys, for they STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. 339 must be cut out of the skin with a knife before a man can get them off. It is stated (but not by Captain Gray) that the whale-lice are occasionally seen in such numbers upon the whales that the individuals so infested are recog- nised at a considerable distance by the peculiar colour im- parted to them by the mass of parasites. It is very difficult to form a theory as to what may be the use of these parasites to the whale. There may possibly be a reason, but I doubt whether the wretches can afford much domestic pleasure and comfort to the persecutee. It may be possible that it is nature’s ordained means for keeping the species in check, and not allowing the whales to increase too rapidly in the seas which they inhabit. I will illustrate my meaning thus :— In the vast forests of Africa live elephants. Now, these animals are so large and strong that there is nothing bigger than they to beat them. From the elephant we go down- wards in the scale of creation, and we will stop at the point of flies. All along this great series we find one kind of animal preying upon another, in obedience to the law, ‘Eat and be eaten.’ The reader will ask, what is to kill and eat the elephant? My answer is, the flies, of course ; and I believe it is a positive fact that a great many ele- phants are killed by flies. These gigantic animals get wounded. In the hot climates where they live the wounds immediately attract swarms of flies; these flies lay their egos, and when the young are hatched out they eat great holes into the elephant’s body. Pain, irritation, and fever are caused by the attacks of these flies, and I am informed that it not unfrequently happens that elephants are found dead, the cause of death being fly-blows. It may be pos- Z2 340 STRUCTURE AND HABITS OF WHALES. sible, therefore, that these whale-lice, minute as they are in comparison to the gigantic size of the whale on which they live, may sometimes cause the death of the whale. The death of the whale would be a great boon to the sharks, sea-birds, shrimps, and other sea creatures, to which his flesh is as a Greenwich dinner to hungry Lon- doners ; but yet these comparatively small beasts are not of themselves sufficiently powerful to kill a whale. A man may fight single-handed a lion, an elephant, or other wild beast, and will probably be victorious ; but place this same victorious man in a bed previously occupied by a colony of fleas or Norfolk Howards, and he would soon run, despite a well-stocked armament of rifles, shot-guns, and other sporting paraphernalia. The same inability in man to fight numbers of minute things has often been proved by salmon-anglers, who have been forced to retreat from the river-bank by clouds of mosquitoes, when they did not care a bit for half a dozen water-bailiffs, even though armed with the new clauses of the Salmon Bill of 1873. It may be possible that these whale-lice, insignificant and unimportant as individuals, may by numbers and con- stant irritation kill a whale fifty-seven feet long and _ weighing over a hundred tons, this being about the largest right whale Captain Gray has ever killed. Whales are also subject to another kind of parasite ; it is a barnacle which buries itself deep in the skin of the heap. It is called Coronula balenearis, or the ¢ whale’s — barnacle.’ A specimen sent me from Golspie was figured and described in Land and Water, May 19, 1866. The specimen itself is in my museum. | i, * Maa. Ae re eS ee 341 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. Ir will be well recollected that a whale was on view in the Westminster Aquarium in October 1877. This whale did not survive very long. Farini, then the manager, with great pluck said to his agent, Mr. Zach Coop, ‘ Zach, he is dead. Go and fetch me another whale; be off directly.’ So off goes Mr. Zach up to Lerwick, Shetland, to see whether, by the assistance of the Lerwick fisher- men, he could not fill up the vacancy in the whale tank in the Westminster Aquarium. Mr. Coop was, however, a little too late in the season for the Lerwick whales, so he returned whaleless. So said Farini, ‘ Well, if you cannot catch a whale this side of the Atlantic, we must go to the other side for him.’ The telegraph was set to work, and a whale-trap was prepared in St. Paul’s Bay, which is situated in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, to the westward of Newfoundland. In the spring of the year the whales come into the estuary of the St. Lawrence River, probably in search of food. So it came to pass that directly the school of whales in the year 1878 entered the river St. Lawrence, they swam straight into the most ingenious trap awaiting them, and were caught, or rather made to strand themselves. > 342 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. A whale ashore is as helpless a thing as a ship ashore. There he must stay, floundering on the sand, rock, or mud, till either the water comes to his assistance, or else he is picked up by the hands of man. Previously to the whales coming to St. Paul’s Bay their travelling carriages were prepared to bring them to London. These consisted of immense boxes or packing-cases, the lids being formed of loose canvas. Zach Coop managed to pack four of these gentlemen—one for Westminster, one for Manchester, and one for Blackpool. The other, the fourth, probably dis- gusted at the whole proceeding, maliciously departed this life in the middle of the Atlantic. The authorities of the Westminster Aquarium tele- graphed me that the whale would probably arrive about six o'clock. I had not long to wait when a cab drove up, out of which jumped Farini, looking very pale and travel- worn. In the transport of the whales from Liverpool various misadventures and difficulties, requiring great management, had taken place. But, however, all’s well that ends well, and the first words that Farini said to me were, ‘ He is all right.’ Having gone through many such expeditions in carrying water beasts long distances, I fully sympathised with Farini’s joyous exclamation. The box was brought tothe Aquarium in a van. They slid it out of the van gently on to the shoulders of a small army of men. After a considerable amount of shuffling of feet, and orders promptly obeyed, the whale’s box was placed upon trestles alongside of his future home, the covering of the canvas was taken off, and I had the first look at him. He was lying on his stomach in the box, and was securely packed round with seaweed so that he i) . * THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 343 could not flop about. I could not see his face, only his blow-hole, which I was delighted to find was acting smoothly and well. The general appearance made one query whether he was alive or dead, but the action of the blow-hole on the top of the head gave one an idea that the creature was a gigantic white human baby with black lips snoring in its sleep. The whale is said to weigh about a ton and a half. We did not attempt to lift him out of the box, but simply ordered the carpenters to knock away the boards from one side of it, and to clear away the seaweed as much as pos- sible. This done, all hands were piped to tilt the box —‘ One, two, three,’ and the whale gradually turned over on his side like a man in a restless sleep. Another inch more up, and Mr. Whale rolled off into the water with a terrific splash and bang, sending the spray flying all over the place. At first he sank right to the bottom, and remained there some little time. We watched him with great anxiety. So numerous had been his adventures for the last five weeks, that no doubt he did not quite know where he was, whether back home in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, or still in his box. Nor had he probably quite made up his mind whether he ought to adapt his blow- hole to breathing air pure and simple, or whether he would have to take the usual precautions to prevent the air getting down into his nose when in the water. After a while the whale began to realise his position ; he gently got up steam with his tail, and gradually ascended to the surface. Arrived there he gave us a specimen of his first blow, which sounded not unlike the 344 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. splutter made by a man when he first reaches the air after a dive. Then he went down again, being probably — somewhat nervous at the assembled company. Finding that he was not molested or bothered by anything, he then began to enjoy himself in his bath, and mightily pleased he seemed to be with the lavations of cold water once more. I was sorry to see that during his five weeks’ journey his cuticle, or scarf-skin, had got loose and was peeling off; but asa set-off to this, he had no cold in his head.. When the last whale arrived he certainly had threatening inflammation of the lungs. This present fellow had no symptoms whatever of this. I picked out of the box a bit of the whale’s cuticle; it is very thin, and about the consistency and feel of oiled ~ silk or gutta-percha sheeting. On one side it is very smooth, and looks as though it had been highly polished with furniture polish; it is very transparent, and exhibits numerous specks, reminding us of the appearance of the insertion of the hairs—always in threes—into a pigskin saddle. JI was pleased to see that the bath seemed to refresh the whale very much, and to relieve him of much | of the skin hanging loose about him. To my mind, the fear was that fungus might grow upon him. After the whale had been in the bath about an hour I again examined him. By this time the beast seemed to have made himself quite at home. He did not seem the least frightened, but was gently swimming up and down the tank. It was a curious thing that not once did he go near the sides of the tank. He kept in the middle, swimming backwards and forwards THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 345 within a given distance. He went to the ends of his beat, turned round, and came back again, sometimes swimming in an oval. When he came to the end of his beat he went ‘threes about.’ In performing this movement, he turned his side up to the top of the water, so that one could see his funny little bead-like black eye. That whales do this when they look to the top of the water— the natural position of the eyes enabling them to see only sideways—is a fact, as I know from Captain David Gray, for he has seen more than once a whale come up from deep water, and inspect the ship, swimming round and round it, just as did the Westminster whale. When the whale had been in his whalery about three hours, he had quite recovered himself both in mind and body. He was swimming very leisurely, very easily, and very gracefully, and blowing about three times in two minutes ; his blow-hole is situated a comparatively long distance from the point of his nose. The first thing to be ob- served was the point of his nose; instantly followed the blow-hole, and you could hear the sharp quick puff, which can be imitated by saying the word ‘puff’ with open lips. Then came his arched back, which appeared for a moment on the surface of the water like a crescent. Many of our friends have doubtless seen porpoises rolling at sea, and what a curious appearance their black backs have in the distance. Upon the swelling waves the dolphins show Their bending backs, then, swiftly darting, go, And in a thousand wreaths their bodies throw. I was at once reminded of pictures on old china, &e., 346 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. of Arion, who made his escape by mounting a dolphin and riding him across the ocean, a fact thus chronicled by Ovid :— But past belief, a dolphin’s archéd back, Preserved Arion from his destined wreck ; Secure he sits, and with harmonious strains Requites the bearer for his friendly pains. How Arion managed to stick on the slippery back of a dolphin, a considerable ‘buck jumper,’ I know not, but poets and painters are very wonderful fellows, and can make impossibilities look like possibilities. The arrival of this whale was important in two senses. Firstly, as a sight pure and simple, to the younger minds certainly educational. I observed two little children gazing most attentively at the whale, and that a new idea was at that moment being photographed on their infant minds I have no doubt. Secondly, the whale may enable natu- ralists to discover many points in the history of Cetacea hitherto unexplained, to wit, the action of the blow-hole. The problem solved by this wonderful piece of mechanism is very marvellous. The first unaided idea, of course, is that an animal destined to live in water must be a fish, and, of course, breathe by gills. I once terribly offended an old salt by telling him a whale was not a fish. ‘Hang it, man!’ he said, ‘I’ve been at sea man and boy for forty years, and now you tell me a whale is not a fish!’ A whale, however, is pure mammalian like ourselves. The young are born alive and suck milk; their blood is warm; they have a four-cavitied heart ; their bones, muscles, and ner- vous system resemble in structure those of other Mam- malia. ae LHE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 347 But the orders are that these great Mammalia are to live all their lives in the waters without ever coming out. Other creatures, notably the hippopotamus, the walrus, and seals, come out of the water when they choose, but get their food in the water ; how then is the breathing of these animals to be managed? In the seal we find self- acting valves that close the apertures in the nostrils as tight as a cork in a wine-bottle when the creature de- scends beneath the waves. In the whale we find altogether a different kind of self-acting breathing-valve. The windpipe does not com- municate with the mouth; a hole is, as it were, bored right through the back of the head. Engineers would do well to copy the action of the valve of the whale’s blow-hole; a more perfect piece of structure it is impos- sible to imagine. Day and night, asleep or awake, the whale works his breathing apparatus in such a manner that not a drop of water ever gets down into the lungs. Again, the whale must of necessity stay a much longer period of time under water than seals; this alone might possibly drown him, inasmuch as the lungs cannot have access to fresh air. We find that this difficulty has been anticipated and obviated by a peculiar reservoir in the venous system, which reservoir is situated at the back of the lungs. The white whale is the Beluga delphinapterus. His home is in the Arctic seas, especially the great bays and straits which so properly record the names of Davis and Hudson, and which may be generally said to separate Greenland (lat. 60°to 80°N.) from the north-east coast of British North America. What they do or whither they i NN a ee ey ee 348 THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. go all the winter, no human being knows. Their structure is such that their fat, which surrounds their body like a great- coat, preserves them during the awful cold they have to bear. In habits these animals are gentle, and not fierce like the great cachalot. They are fond of company, and go in herds. Jam informed that they will seek rather than avoid the company of man, and that when a vessel is in sight they will come and play round the bows as a sort of welcome to their kingdom in the vast deep. It is also stated that Mr. Beluga forms a sort of advanced guard of the valuable whalebone whale; and when the beluga is seen, harpooners begin to look up their whale lances. Like the right or whalebone whale, the attachment of the mother to its calf is very great. The calf, when first born, is said to be of a dazzling whiteness; as it gets bigger it becomes milk-white. Beluga’s food is cod, flat- fish, such as plaice, flounders, &c., and possibly salmon. At the Aquarium he was fed with eels. One of these eels managed to creep inside a fold of the whale’s skin, and seemed inclined to eat\the whale instead of the whale eating him: the whale had to be caught with a great sheet of canvas, and taken out of the water before this eel could be removed. Tench were also tried, as the eels seemed a little too active for Beluga, and tench are slug- -gish. It was curious to remark how the eels seemed to know he was their enemy, for they kept up in a corner quite clear of his track. Roach also were placed in his tank; it. was very remarkable to see how the roach seemed likewise to know that the whale was their enemy. As he came near them the shoals broke up immediately, and dispersed right and left as quickly as they could. THE WHITE WHALE AT WESTMINSTER AQUARIUM. 349 Beluga’s mouth was not very wide; he had nine or ten small teeth in it. His pectoral fins were oval, broad, and thick, and he generally used them for balancing purposes. Every now and then he took a stroke with them to assist his forward movement. Those who wish for a nearer view of the beluga cron examine the cast which I took of him now in my museum, which contains a very fair collection of casts of the whale kind. Casting is the only possible way of preserving the exact outline of whales. The plaster takes accurately the impression of every fold in the skin, and the exact dimensions of the tail, mouth, eyes, lips, &e. No stuffing skeletons or drawings will do this. The drawback to casting is that a is very expensive and exceedingly laborious. | 350 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE AROTIC NARWHAL. WHEN at Peterhead, during the herring inquiry, I observed on board the whaler ‘ Eclipse,’! a very fine specimen of the narwhal’s skull, with the horn still resting in it. This specimen Captain Gray most kindly gave me for my fish museum, South Kensington. The total length of this horn projecting from the skull was 4 ft. 1 in. and the portion of the horn inside the skull 10 inches; the weight of the horn ten and a half pounds. The beauty of this specimen is that it is quite in the rough. One-half of it presents a dark reddish appearance, as if it had been touched over with paint. Captain Gray tells me this is a natural colour, and is frequently seen in narwhal horn. The twist of the horn goes from right to left. The horn grows from the left side of the skull. It seldom if ever grows from the right side of the skull, never from the centre. Occasionally narwhals’ skulls are found with two horns ; in this case the right horn is always very small. Captain Gray has been kind enough to send me the fol- lowing interesting account of the narwhals that have come under his notice. It will be seen from this what huge creatures these narwhals really are :— 1 J have given a full description of the ‘ Eclipse’ in my Log: book of a Fisherman and Zoologist, p. 295, NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL. 351 ‘T herewith send you all the measurements of narwhals that I have recorded. Piciaaiemaie; lenoth, 12 ft. 6 in; girth, 7 ft..6 in.; horn, 3 ft. 10 in. long, very rare in the female. ‘2nd. Male; length, 13 ft; girth, 8 ft.; horn, 6 ft. 4, in. » ‘3rd. Male; length, 14 ft. 3 in.; girth, 8 ft. 4 in.; horn, 6 ft. 43 in. ‘4th. Male; length, 14.ft. 4 in.; girth, 9 ft. 1 in.; had a broken horn, which I sent you lately. fora Male; length, 15.ft. 1 in. ;, girth, 9 ft. 5 in. ; horn, 7 ft. 6 in. ‘6th. Male ; length, 15 ft. 4 in.; girth, 10 ft.; horn, 7 ft. 8 in. You have this horn in your museum. : ‘The narwhal whose head and horn I gave you lately, was caught in latitude 78° 45’ N.; longitude 0° 30’ W. I do not know what might have been the length of the longest horn I have seen, but I have measured one 8 ft. 4 in., and I do not think they often exceed that length. ‘JT am not sure what use the narwhal has for its horn. It is only the males who usually have them. We see them often striking them against each other, and they are nearly always broken at the point. ‘The narwhal is a very peaceful creature; they are like their big brothers the whales. The male and female go in different herds. They are very subject to colds, if one may judge from the hoarse way some of them blow; you would fancy sometimes you had got amongst a herd of cattle. I examine the stomach of every narwhal taken, and find that their staple food in Greenland is cuttlefish. / ~ * *. % 352 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL. The inner skin of the narwhal is used for making shoe- leather. | ‘Narwhals are only taken by whale-fishers as a pastime. I have heard of vessels in Davis Straits taking’ 100 of them. I do not know any particular use for narwhal horns. ‘There was a great demand for them some years — since. Their value at that time was from 20s. to 30s. per pound. It was said they were sent to Japan to ornament — religious houses or churches, but I do not know the truth of this.’ Captain Gray is quite right about the use of narwhal horns in Japanese temples. A friend of mine sent two hundred pounds’ worth of narwhal horns to the Chinese and Japanese markets, but unfortunately the ship was taken by pirates. The Chinese Ambassador not long ago examined at my house the. specimen Captain Gray gave me, and was so much struck with its appearance that I do not think it possible he could have seen a narwhal horn before. He was most anxious to get a specimen to take back with him to China. I fancy that the narwhal horns are used in some form of worship in the Buddhist temples in China. As regards the question of the female narwhal carrying a horn, Captain Gray captured in June 1872, as above mentioned, a female narwhal carrying a horn 3 ft. 10 in. in length. The only other instance I have met with of a female narwhal having a horn is mentioned by Scoresby. In the account of his voyage to Greenland in 1822, he says :—‘ Besides the whale now captured we killed during our stay near the same place two female narwhals, one of which, a case most extraordinary if not unpre- ~ ¥ a oa! = } NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL. 353 cedented in this sex, had an externalhorn. This horn was A ft. 3 in. in length, of which 12 inches were embedded in the skull. It had also a milk tusk, as is common in others of the sex, 9 inches long, of a conical form, and obliquely truncated at the thicker end, without the knot found in many of the milk tusks. The horn, asin the male, was on the left side of the head. The length of the animal was 13 ft. 6 in. It was beautifully variegated with bluish black or grey spots. It differed in no respect from other females of the same age excepting with regard to the horn.’ The ivory of the weapon is valuable; it is more com- pact, harder, and more susceptible of a good polish than that of the elephant’s tusk. There is shown to visitors at the Versailles Library a walking-stick formed of a nar- whal’s tusk, ornamented with mother-of-pearl. The throne of the Kings of Denmark once—and perhaps still—to be seen in the Castle of Rosenberg, is of the same material. Some years ago there was a remarkable collection of narwhal tusks on sale at Mr. Wareham’s, Castle Street, Leicester Square. There were upwards of forty of these tusks, varying in length from 2 ft. 6 in. to 9 feet. I do not recollect ever having seen so many or such fine tusks in one series. When Captain Gray returned from his whaling voyage in 1879, he gave me the following most interesting account of a fight between a narwhal and a walrus :— Extract from the Log of the SS. ‘ Eclipse, July 6, 1879. ‘Running north through floes and loose ice this forenoon I noticed some distance ahead what I at first took to be the stock of a hand harpoon, standing out of very greasy water, and a number of birds sitting round it. This I at AA 854 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL. first thought might be a dead whale, just rising to the surface, but I soon saw that it was a narwhal horn. As we came nearer I observed something brown-looking, and was puzzled for some time before I made this out to be a walrus, evidently holding the narwhal. ‘As soon as we were near enough, I sent two boats away with orders to strike a hand harpoon into the nar- whal, and fire a gun harpoon into the walrus, both of which they did. The first harpooner struck the narwhal close past the walrus’s nose, whereupon he looked very savage, and let go his hold of the narwhal, which immediately began to sink. The walrus being unwilling to part with his prey upon such easy terms, dived underneath the nar- whal and raised him to the surface, again renewing his hold with his teeth, and clasping him round the body with his flippers. ‘The second boat now came up, and the harpooner fired his gun harpoon through the walrus’s neck. He then let go his hold of the narwhal, and dragged the boat a consider- able distance to windward, when a rifle bullet in the back of the head finished him. ‘On examination, after getting them on board, we found the narwhal disembowelled, and a oreat part of the belly eaten away or torn into shreds by the walrus, who had been very particular as to the parts he ate, and had been taking plenty of time to feed. He had eaten the blubber as clean off the skin as if it had been flinched’ with a knife. The narwhal was quite fresh, and newly killed, and in the death-struggle had been all scored with the walrus’s tusks from nose to tail in every direction, although the inner skin was not cut. _—— NATURAL HISTORY OF THE ARCTIC NARWHAL, 355 ©The walrus was in prime condition. The blubber upon him was three inches thick; his stomach was quite full of pieces of sealskin and the part of the narwhal which he had eaten. He had, at a moderate estimate, one hundred and fifty gallons of oil and blubber in his stomach. ‘The length of the narwhal was fourteen feet, exclusive of horn, by nine feet in circumference. The length of horn was five feet. ‘The walrus measured eleven feet long, and nine feet ten inches in circumference. ‘The question is, How did the walrus manage to hold a powerful animal like the narwhal ? certainly more in his element than the walrus, and who can spin out a hun- dred fathoms of whale line very smartly, even with a big gun harpoon through and through him. ‘The only way I can think of is that he had found the narwhal asleep, gone underneath him, dug his tusks into his belly, and clasped him round the body with his flippers, in which position we found them, with this difference, that the walrus was uppermost. ‘This is only the third walrus I have seen off on the deep-water whaling banks during the last fourteen years. Their natural home being near the land, where their ordinary food is, all kinds of shellfish, I could never before understand how they got their living so far from the shore, not knowing that they would eat seals and nar- whals, or that they could catch them. ‘T expect that those we see out in deep water are like rogue elephants driven out of the herd, or like the man-eating tigers we hear of in India.’ AA2Z 356 UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR, AT THE SOUTHPORT AQUARIUM. I was much pleased to be able to pay a short visit to the Southport Aquarium on my way home from the north in November 1876. The most remarkable novelty was a splendid alligator about eight feet long. He had a nice spacious glass cage all to himself, the two ends of the cage containing gravel stones, and in the centre was a pond in which he could bathe when so inclined. When first bought, Mr. Alligator was in a very seedy condition indeed, terribly thin and wan-looking—in fact, half starved. His skin was all in cracks, and his coat of mail had to be oiled every morning by means of a flannel on the end of a stick. This acted like a Turkish bath to our friend, and did his constitution good. For many days, even weeks, he sulkily refused to eat, and lay quiet and still like a stuffed thing. At last he took—all of a gulp— alive pigeon, and ever afterwards he fed well. \ The secret of getting him to eat was temperature—temperature the old story, the key to so many fishery problems, whether of salmon, oysters, or alligators. Hot-water pipes were in- troduced under the floor of his den, and Mr. Alligator, feeling the agreeable heat to his gouty toes and elegant figure, fancied, I suppose, he was back again in the tropics, UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR. 357 so he woke up and began to eat; and what more tasteful beginning could there be than a nice live pigeon with feather sauce? This ogre now feeds capitally on pigeons ; in fact, he is getting expensive to keep; he will eat beef, fish, and almost anything. They don’t stand live pigeon dinners every day. Anxious to show me his pet feeding, the curator offered to give the alligator more supper ; he had already devoured his proper supper. The curator got on to the top of the cage and touched him gently with an iron rod. I was surprised to see the activity of the rascal; he opened his eyes with a jerk, up went his head like a run-away hansom cab horse, he gave an indignant whisk with his tail like a lady picking up her skirts when a clumsy fellow puts his foot on the pet lace, and, to my surprise, began to puff himself up. Gradually he became larger, larger, and larger, like the blowing up of a football; his armour glittered, and the bony studs stood well out from the soft intermediate skin. I confess, when at his full I longed to run a pin into him to save his life, as I saw he had a chance of meeting with the same fate as the foolish frog in Atsop’s Fables, who vainly puffed himself up trying to become as big as the ox, with whom he was having an argument. Just, however, as he came to the bursting point, Alligatorus Rex alligatorum suddenly relaxed him- self, and his steam escaped, I suppose, through his larynx and nose. Anyhow, he began a most sonorous hiss. ‘ H-i-s-s, h-i-s-s;’ I can hear it now—just the noise a dragon ought to make. It was like no hiss I ever heard before, much deeper and louder sounding than any snake. As he continued his hissing he became thinner and 358 UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR, thinner, till he looked quite the skeleton of his former i pretty self. Then he began to blow himself up again, for (I could see it) the iron rod was getting up the monkey of Mr. Alligator. A chicken’s head and neck were then suddenly thrown into the bath; in an instant Leviathan forgot his rage. (Mem.: when a homo bipes implumes, one of our own noble species, loses his temper, give him a dinner, and he | will be all right, showing once again that ‘the nearest way to the heart is down the mouth.’) However, hearing the chicken’s head fall splash into the water, the alligator —he should be called Uncle Tom—was after it in an instant, and seized it just as a dog catches up a running rat in his mouth. He first of all bit it spitefully as though to kill it, if it happened to be a live thing; and then—one, two, three, and away—chump; back went his head, down his throat went the chicken’s head in a moment. Reader, hold your nose and swallow a pill before the looking-glass, and you will understand how Uncle Tom swallowed the chicken’s head. His blackship then gave a gulp, and, like the ‘Oh the poor workhouse boy’ in the song, asked for more. Three chickens’ heads and a bit of beef, extra rations, did Uncle Tom get that evening, and all on myaccount. Supper over, he crawled on to his warm bed of shingle, and as the door over his head closed, he lazily shut his eyes, as much as to say, ‘Thank ye, my boy, you may come as often as -you like. Now don’t bother me, I’m going to sleep; good night, my hearties.’ ‘ Here, hie! please give me a nice live pike for my breakfast to-morrow morning. I like pike; I shall dream of pike, for I like (just as you like) a bit of sport as Fie hn he AT THE SOUTHPORT AQUARIUM. 359 well as a bit of grub, and if I can combine the two, why, so much the better. Really, ‘ Uncle Tom’ is a grand beast ; he is growing so fast that he is to have a new drawing-room and dining- room, and then he will have space to swish his tail; he has not much room for his tail just now. I wonder how it is that in the ‘ struggle for existence’ his tail has not begun to curl; may be his descendants in one hundred thousand years will have their tails curled up like a pug- dog’s. By the way, why do some pigs wear straight tails, some curly tails? There’s a problem for you. Besides big Uncle Tom, there are a number of smaller alligators. Close to the end of the Uncle’s cage is a charming family of baby alligators, from ten inches to one foot long. These little boys and girls have a nice hot nursery, heated from underneath, and a flannel blanket over their dear little heads. They are as active as blackbeetles, and when their counterpane is taken off, scuttle away in all directions. If I reckoned right, there were twenty or thirty of these little fellows. Several of the ladies in Southport have purchased pets from among them, and it may be that no Southport lady will consider her establishment perfect without a baby alligator to bask on the hearth-rug, and go out for a walk on the promenade with her. When the pet defuncts, he can be stuffed, gilt, and put in the hat for an ornament, don’t you know ? However, those inthe Aquarium are growing fast; they | gorge like charity children at a ‘tea and bun’ festival. The keeper cuts up fish into small bits, and throws them into the cage ; they scramble for them famously, and apparently love each other in that disinterested, charitable, UGE UNCLE TOM, THE ALLIGATOR. and unselfish manner which may be seen by a careful observer who throws down handfuls of coppers among the London gamins and street Arabs in the crowd when wait- ing for the Lord Mayor to pass through Fleet Street on ‘ All Sprats’ Day, November 9. | But there are yet more of Uncle Tom’s relations at Southport. A huge box, looking like a gigantic coal- scuttle, stands near the boilers in the engine-room. Open .- sesame! and lo and behold a nest of young alligators of all sizes and shapes, like the ladies’ bonnets and hats in a Regent Street shop! The curator dives his hand in and picks them out one by one, holding them aloft like an old fishwife in the Edinburgh market selling Scotch haddies. The lot are not yet presentable. They have not yet received the certificates of the School Board, and their tempers and appetites are not sufficiently mollified by the furnace fire to go into the glass apartments which are getting ready for them, so they remain at their ease, toast themselves before the engine-room fire, while the engine- driver consoles their minds by whistling to them ‘ Tommy, make room for your uncle,’ and feeds them with bread and cheese, which they will not eat. 361 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY, IN all ages and in all times there has been a natural desire among the human race to perpetuate the memory of them- selves, their ancestors, and of illustrious persons, both men and women. The modes adopted of preserving the memory of deceased people have been, first, by preserving the actual bodies ; second, by making likenesses of these bodies; or third, by erecting monuments with the name engraved upon them. In the earliest ages of mankind the ancient Egyptians, who had attained toa high state of civilisation, attempted to preserve the remains of their friends by means of embalming. My dear old friend Herodotus, born B.c. 484, who, some two thousand three hundred years ago, note-book in hand, ‘inspected’ the manners and customs of the Egyptians, obtained from the priests—I wonder how he got the information ?—a detailed account of how to make mummies. This is the sum and substance of Herodotus’s official report. Mummy-making was probably a profession, and these mummy-makers charged pretty high for their labours. To make a person into a first-class mummy cost a talent of silver (about equal to 225/. of English money), the second cost twenty mine (or 75/.), the third a much smaller sum. The Egyptian mummy-makers knew quite 362 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. well that the dry climate of Egypt would greatly assist in the preservation of their work. Those of my readers who wish to see a first-class mummy should examine, in the Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, the re- mains of the priest of the god Ammon. The name of this dignitary of the Egyptian Church was Horsiensi of Thebes. He was the son of Naspihiniegori, another priest, and he held the office of thurifer, or incense-bearer—there was no Lord Penzance in those days. Now the Rev. Horsiensi has in his mummy state attained a good old age. Thebes, also called Hecatompylos, on account of its hundred gates, was in its splendour 1600—800 B.c., so that the mummied priest we can go and see any day is about three thousand years old. The first form of monument was simplicity itself—it consisted simply of throwing a stone or earth upon the deceased person. We find this idea conveyed to us very neatly by Horace (Ode 28) in the request made by the deceased sailor, Archytas, to throw an earthen veil over his shipwrecked body :— | At tu, nauta, vagee ne parce malignus arenz Ossibus et capiti inhumato Particulam dare. ..... Quamquam festinas (non est mora longa) licebit Injecto ter pulvere curras, Nor thou, my friend, refuse with impious hand A little portion of this wandering sand To these my poor remains. _ Whate’er thy haste, oh! let my prayer prevail, Thrice throw the sand, then hoist the flying sail. The urgent request of poor Archytas was probably due THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 363 to the idea which prevailed among the good people of those days, that an unburied person wandered about after death one hundred years. Here is the evidence of the belief. Virgil writes (Aneid) :— Heec omnis, quam cernis, inops inhumataque turba est ; Portitor ille Charon ; hi quos vehit unda sepulti Nee ripas datur horrendas et rauca fluenta, Transportare prius, quam sedibus ossa quierunt, Centum errant annos, volitantque hee littora circum. ‘All that crowd which you see consists of unburied persons. The ferryman is Charon; these whom the stream carries are interred, for it is not permitted to transport them over the horrid banks and hoarse resounding waves before their bones are lodged in urns. They wander a hundred years, and flutter about these shores.’ The loose stones thrown on a body out of respect were probably after a while replaced by one stone. The body was buried, and the stone placed above the body as a memorial of its resting-place. The best example of this, to my idea, is conveyed by the Pyramids of Egypt, which are sepulchral monuments to the memory of kings. When the Radcliffe Library was first built at Oxford, it was spite- fully remarked that this learned physician simply wished to erect a huge monument to himself. The modern form of monument isa stone placed either over the grave, or else in some place where the deceased was personally known. Such a monument may be said to represent the separate stones thrown on Archytas, con- solidated into one block, with the name subsequently in- scribed thereon. Another kind of monument is the actual representation 364 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. of the person when alive. The figure was represented either as a whole figure such as a life-sized statue, or as a bust ; and the figure or bust we find either erected in public places, such as the Duke of Wellington at Hyde Park Corner, Lord Nelson at Charing Cross, Jenner at Kensing- ton Gardens; or placed in a consecrated edifice. Hence probably the origin of conserving these memorials of the illustrious departed at Westminster Abbey, that tomb of kings; or, as the eloquent Dean Stanley so aptly called it, the ‘home of the people of England, and the most vene- rated fabric of the English Church.’ These monuments are made sometimes of stone, generally of the most imperishable stone, viz. marble. They are also sometimes made of metal, highly gilt and ornamented ; seldom of wood. ‘There is, however, another kind of material which claims favour to be utilised for monumental purposes; that material is wax. Wax in itself is about as imperishable a substance as can be found among animal or vegetable substances ; butit has the dis- advantage of being easily melted, and very friable, hence it has not been used very much for monuments. Wax was sometimes used in embalming, and it was a capital material for making the wrinkles in the bandages of mum- mies air-tight ; even in the present day a form of wax is used for the tops of pickle-bottles. The body of King Agesilaus was enveloped in wax, and conveyed to Lace- demon. The Persians also used it for sepulchral purposes— Perse jam cera circumlitos condiunt ut quam maxime permaneant diuterna corpora. In the days of our an- cestors, it appears that wax was put on its trial for monumental purposes, and I propose in this article to THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 365 make some remarks on the use of wax for effigies, com- monly known as waxworks. Waxen images of persons seem somehow or another to have fallen into disrepute. For my own part, if wax can be used to preserve the likeness of a person, I do not see why it should not be as highly esteemed as marble. I suppose it is not much thought of because of the waxen heads of ladies with long hair we see in the barbers’ shops. Waxen babies, pigs, ears, hands, arms, eyes, noses, &c., are hung up as ex votos at the present day in churches in France. I have, lately examined very carefully the oldest wax- worksin England. These, I need hardly say, are the wax- works now in Westminster Abbey, and which to my mind are national relics worthy of the greatest respect and reverence. The following account is given in a description of the Abbey, its monuments and curiosities, printed by ‘J. Newbery, at the Bible and Sun, in St. Paul’s Church- yard, 1754.’ In this curious pamphlet, the Westminster Abbey waxworks are called the ‘ Play of the Dead Volks’ (sic) and the ‘ Ragged Regiment.’ The following is the account of the condition of these waxworks one hundred and twenty years ago :— ‘Over this chapel (Islip, otherwise St. Erasmus) is a chantry, in which are two large wainscot-presses, full of the effigies of princes and others of high quality buried in the Abbey. These effigies resembled the deceased as nearly as possible, and were wont to be exposed at the funerals of our princes and other great personages in open chariots, with their proper ensigns of royalty or honour appended. Those that are here laid up are in a sad 366 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. mangled condition; some stripped and others in tattered robes, but all maimed or broken. The most ancient are the least injured, by which it would seem as if the cost- liness of their clothes had occasioned the ravage; for the robes of. Edward VI., which were once of crimson velvet, but now appear like leather, are left entire; but those of Queen Elizabeth and King James I. ave entirely stripped, as are all the rest of everything of value. In - two handsome wainscot-presses are the effigies of King William and Queen Mary and Queen Anne in good condi- tion, and greatly admired by every eye that beholds them.’ The figure of Cromwell is not here mentioned, but in the account of his lying in state the effigy is described as made to the life in wax, apparelled in velvet, gold lace, and ermine. ‘This effigies (sic) was laid upon the bed of state, and carried upon the hearse in funeral procession ; both were then deposited in Westminster Abbey; but at the Restoration the hearse was broken in pieces, and the effigies was destroyed after hanging from a window at Whitehall.’ When my father was Dean of Westminster, somehow or other he seldom used to show visitors to the Abbey into this curious room, and it is now only to be seen by special order from the Dean. The visitor ascends through a time-worn staircase into the chapel, and a most curious sight then meets his eye. Set up against the wall are very large, massive cases, not unlike big clock cases. There are glasses in front of these, so that the figures inside can well be seen. ‘As far as I could see, they are not labelled except with chalk superscriptions. ° i 2 — oo ‘ b ? a . a Pe . Nit hl ota = ’ ae —_ a IO Rati as tI RA tee ah ROM A Na Pg BFA AEE A RNG, 5 ERLE AE SOLO ETO ANGE a AGE A ESF GCE FIDE an THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 367 Dr. Stanley, Dean of Westminster, has, in his most ‘interesting ‘Memorials of Westminster Abbey,’ p. 340 (Murray, 1868), the following able observations on these waxworks :— ~*Amongst the various accompaniments of great funerals—the body lying in state, guarded by the nobles of the realm ; the torchlight procession ; the banners and arms of the deceased hung over the tomb—there was one so peculiarly dear to the English public as to require a short notice. ‘This was the herse—not, as now, the car which con- veys the coffin, but a platform highly decorated with black hangings, and containing a wa«en effigy of the deceased person. It usually remained for a month in the Abbey, near the grave, but in the case of sovereigns for a much longer time.. It was the main object of attraction, sometimes even in the funeral sermon. Laudatory verses were attached to it with pins, wax, or paste. Of this kind probably was Ben Jonson’s epitaph on Lady Pembroke :— Underneath this sable herse Lies the subject of all verse, Sidney’s sister,’ &e. They were ever highly esteemed as works of art. ‘Mr. Emanuel Decretz (Sergeant-painter to King Charles I.) told me! in 1649 that the catafalco of King James at his funerall (which is a kind of bed of state, erected in Westminster Abbey, as Robert, Earl of Essex had, Oliver Cromwell, and General Monke) was very ingeniously designed by Inigo Jones, and that he made 1 Aubrey’s Letters and Lives, ii. 412. 368 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. the four heads of the caryatides of plaster of Paris, and made the drapery of them of white callico, which was very — handsome and very cheap, and showed as well as if they — had been cutt out of white marble. ; ‘These temporary erections, planted here and there in different parts of the Abbey, must of themselves have formed a singular feature in its appearance. But the most interesting portion of them was the “ lively effigy,” which was there placed after having been carried in a chariot before the body. This was a practice which has its precedent, if not its origin, in the funerals of the great men of the Roman Commonwealth. The one distinguish- ing mark of a Roman noble was the right of having figures with waxen masks, representing his ancestors, carried at his obsequies and placed in his hall. ‘In England the royal funerals were, till the time of Henry V., distinguished by the exhibition of the corpse itself of the deceased sovereign. But even before that time the practice of effigies had been adopted. ‘These wax figures were detached from the herses and kept in the Abbey, generally near the graves of the deceased, but were gradually drafted off into wainscot presses above the Islip Chapel. Here they were seen in Dryden’s time— And now the presses open stand, And you may see them all a-row. ‘In 1658 the following were the waxen figures thus exhibited : — Henry the Seventh and bis fair Queen, Edward the First and his Queen, 3 5 % ¢. rs € me , t Pl EE ANS ep ROL ATE POOP ge ee ee ee eae THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 369 Henry the Fifth here stands upright, And his fair Queen was this Queen, The noble Prince, Prince Henry, King James’s eldest son, King James, Queen Anne, Queen Elizabeth, And so this Chapel’s done. ‘With this agrees the curious notice of them in 1708 :— ‘And so we went on to see the ruins of majesty in the women (sic, waxen ?) figures placed there by authority. As soon as we had ascended half a score stone steps in a dirty, cobweb hole, and in old, worm-eaten presses, whose doors flew open at our approach, here stood Edward III. as they told us, which was a broken piece of waxwork, a battered head, and a straw-stuffed body, not one-quarter covered with rags. His beautiful queen stood by, not better in repair; and so, the number of half a score kings and queens, not near so good figures as the King of the Beggars make, and all the begging crew would be ashamed of their company. The rear was brought up with Good Queen Bess, with the remnants of an old dirty ruff, and nothing else to cover her. ‘Stow also describes the effigies of Edward III. and Philippa, Henry IV. and Catherine, Henry VII. and Elizabeth of York, Henry, Prince of Wales, Elizabeth, James I., and Queen Anne as shown in the chamber close to Islip Chapel. Of these the wooden blocks, entirely denuded of any ornament, still remain. ‘But there are eleven figures in a tolerable state of preservation. That of Queen Elizabeth was, as we have seen, already worn out in 1708, and the existing figure is, BB 370 THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBRY. © doubtless, the one made by order of the Chapter to com- memorate the bicentenary of the foundation of the Colle- giate Church in 1760. As late as 1783 it stood in Henry VII.’s Chapel. The effigy of Charles II. used to stand over his grave, and close beside him that of General Monk. The former is tolerably perfect, and seems to have early attracted. attention from the contrast with his battered predecessors. Monk used to stand beside his monument by Charles II.’s grave. The effigy is in too dilapidated a condition to be shown, but the remnants of his armour exist still. The famous cap, in which the contributions for the showmen were collected, is gone.’ The first effigy to which I made my bow was King Charles II., dressed in magnificent raiment. The wax of the face is somewhat bleached by the sun, but I should imagine from the pictures that the portrait is exceedingly good. The robes once must have been very grand; the lace on the king’s breast is of the finest Venetian point. The king has long black hair; he was evidently a dark- looking man, but one expects that any moment his fea- tures will break out into a jovial smile. King Charles II. died a.D. 1685—nearly two hundred years ago. If this is the original effigy used at his funeral, it has lasted very well indeed. Immediately opposite King Charles II. stands, also in a large case like a clock case, the Duchess of Buckinghamshire, with one son as a child. She was the daughter of James II.; she died in 1743, and the waxen effigies of herself and her son were prepared for her funeral. It is difficult, on account of the bad light, exactly to make out her dress, but it appeared to be very magnificent, though dust-covered, and in excellent pre- -THE WAXWORKS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY. 371 servation, although nearly one hundred and forty years old. The other surviving effigies are those of William and Mary, Queen Anne, the beautiful Duchess of Richmond, of Charles II.’s time, the Earl of Chatham, and Lord Nelson; the last two figures not being genuine funeral effigies, but added as attractions to the collection. 372 THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON. PASSOVER CUSTOMS OF LONDON JEWS. Havine heard that a great number of small fry of fresh- water fish were being sent to the Jews’ fish-markets in London, between Bishopsgate and Whitechapel, in the spring of 1878, I made time, during the sitting of the Committee on Mr. Mundella’s Fresh-water Fishery Bill, | now a most useful Act of Parliament, to inspect for myself, in order to see how far the proposed provisions of this Act might interfere with the food supply of those wonderful people the Jews. My visit was paid just before the Feast of the Passover was about to commence. This part of London is simply a Jewish colony, and the general appearance of the place and people gave me the idea of a strange foreign town. I seldom heard ~ a English spoken at all, in the streets or between buyer and seller, but a language was used in conversation quite strange tome. I wondered if it might be Hebrew. The streets were very narrow and very dirty; the shops also had a strange look about them; the advertisements in the windows appeared to be in Hebrew, not in English. The bakers seemed very busy; their shop windows were filled with round thin cakes, about twelve inches across ; these are the Passover cakes. Several men were packing Se) THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON. 37 these cakes in half-hundredweights, probably to send to Jews in other parts of England. Another species of food I observed was quite new to me, namely, cucumbers, apparently boiled and placed in salt and water, selling at a penny or halfpenny a slice ; I cannot think how any one can eat them. The fried fish shops were very abundant; the fish was sold cold, and looked excellent: of course I tasted this; it was plaice, cut into junks, and sold for a penny and twopence ajunk. This fish is, I believe, first dipped in batter, and then fried in boiling oil; but this cannot be quite all, ‘because the fish had a nice delicate taste of almonds; perhaps it may be almond oil that is used, or essence of almonds with salad oil. Halibut, as well as plaice, seems to be a very favourite fish with the Jews, but it is more expensive. Halibut is considered by very many people to be superior to any other sea fish. Some of the shops sold fowls. I observed that all the fowls sold were very old, many of the hens having long spurs; I understand that a Jew or Jewess will always buy fat fowls, no matter what their age may be; they buy for weight, if for nothing else. The same rule applies to old ducks and geese—they must have weight: they probably have some peculiar way of cooking these old fowls. When they buy live fowls, they take them to their butcher, and pay a penny or twopence to have them killed: there are persons employed purposely to kill the beasts and other animals. The bullock is not slaughtered in the same way that is usual in ordinary slaughter- houses ; according to the Jewish religion, the beast must die from its throat being cut, instead of being knocked on 374 THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON. the head. The slaughterer of the cattle must be a Jew. ‘London Labour and London Poor’ tells us, ‘Two slaughterers are appointed by the Jewish authorities of the synagogue, and they can employ others, who must likewise be Jews: if there is any trace of disease in the ‘animal, the meat is pronounced unfit for the food of the Jews, and is sold to the Christians. To the parts exposed for sale, when the slaughtering has been according to the Jewish law, there is attached a leaden seal, stamped in Hebrew characters with the name of the examining party sealing. The meat killed by a Christian is called tryfer; that killed by the Jews is called kosher. Ona Saturday there is cold fish for breakfast and supper; indeed, a Jew would pawn his shirt off his back rather than go without fish then, and in holiday time he will have it; it is not considered a holiday unless there is fish. The thing that struck me most was the custom of the Jewish women wearing wigs. When standing at the corner J counted no less than nine Jewesses wearing wigs. Some of these wigs were brown and some black. They were apparently not worn for show purposes; some were low down on the forehead, some all awry, and some at the back of the head. I cannot conceive how the Jewesses can wear these hideous wigs. I believe this custom of wearing wigs is not confined to the poorer classes. Statistics inform us that thirty-five thousand Jews reside in England; of these about eighteen thousand live in London. Of all curious places in London com- mend me to the Jewish fish-market in Petticoat Lane. My learned friend Dr. Adler, the eminent Jewish Minister, and son of the chief Rabbi, wrote me to the os) CW nett aati nae et ior 48 THE JEWS’ FISH-MARKET IN LONDON. ts Wat _ following effect :—‘ We Jews eat fresh-water fish simply because we like them, and because the poor can afford to buy them better than meat, which is more expensive. We eat cucumbers simply because we regard them as a delicacy, and most of our poor come from Holland and Germany, where everybody eats cucumbers. ‘The origin of eating fresh-water fish and cucumbers _ may possibly be derived from the fifth verse of the elev- enth chapter of Numbers: “We remember the fish, which we did eat in Egypt freely ; the cucumbers, and the melons, and the leeks, and the onions, and the garlick.” ‘With reference to the wigs worn by the Jewish women, these wigs are only worn by married women, mostly Polish. The object is to cover the hair go as not to be so attractive as before marriage. ‘Our Passover is the eating of unleavened bread, but the Paschal lamb is not offered any more, as the Temple is destroyed. ‘The language you heard in the market was not Hebrew; Hebrew is not spoken any more as a living language. The conversations you heard were carried on in a kind of German or Dutch mixed up with a few Hebrew words. The advertisements in the shop windows were not Hebrew, but German in Hebrew letters. A few Hebrew words are used, such as kosher, “that which is lawful to eat.” Meat of an animal that has died with- out being properly slaughtered, or suffering from any disease, is called tryfer.’ 376 THE MANATEE. It is very satisfactory to find that the science of natural history gets more and more popular year by year. This fact, I think, is obvious, inasmuch as it now pays to bring — to this country, for purely show purposes, rare and valu- able creatures from even the most distant parts of the world. Five manatees have been exhibited in this country. The first was caught in 1866 in the Maroni River, Suri- nam, and Mr. Clarence Bartlett went out on purpose to bring it over. This animal was called by the familiar name of Patcheley, and he became by handling quite tame. Mr. Bartlett was in the habit of going into the water to feed him from a bottle containing milk, of which he was very fond. With a great deal of trouble Mr. Bart- lett brought the animal to this country, but, unfortunately, not alive. The name manatee has been given to this animal on account of the hand-like shape of the swimming paws, hence manatee. This curious creature is found in the great waters of South America, especially in the Amazon, and in Africa. It is also called Vacca marina, or sea- cow. I have consulted my old friend Gesner’s Icones 1 «agi. esi os -=s == en - ot ale ig Naeem THE MANATEE. SEL Anvmalium (Heidelberg, 1606). He gives a wonderful picture of the sea-cow—meer-ochs in German. Of course Gesner had never seen a manatee or sea-cow; but what easier than to make one from imagination? We find, therefore, a very rude drawing of a cow’s head pro- jecting out of the water. The cow has the mouth open, as if in the act of bellowing, and has a splendid beard and dilated nostyils. The next manatee came to the Zoological Gardens in August 1875. This animal was sent over by Mr. R. Swain, from Pin Point, Demerara, South America. The small seal pond was prepared for her reception by filling it with fresh water warmed to a proper temperature. The poor manatee seemed to much enjoy her bath after such a long sea voyage. | I do not recollect ever having seen a more interesting animal. The manatee belongs to the class Sirenia, but it is very puzzling to know what she is, whether a pachy- derm or a cetacean. I think she may be said to be a little of both. She is purely an aquatic animal, and when seen in the water her head reminds one of something between a mole and a pig. Her body is ter- minated by a large tail, the shape of a lady’s fan. She swims with it moving it up and down, with the same action as a porpoise, and not sideways like a fish. Take a pig, tie his hind legs and curly tail, and flatten them into a broad, flat. appendage, like a beaver’s tail; turn his fore-feet into paddles. like a turtle’s flippers; cut off his ears, give him valvular nostrils like a seal, re- duce his eyes to one-fourth, and then you will have a manatee. The people in Demerara call it the ‘sea-pig.’ 378 THE MANATEE. The eyelids are very peculiar; they are formed of circular muscular rings, like india-rubber rings. The hairy-eared — rhinoceros has the same peculiar formation of eyelids. The manatee’s eyes are very minute, and of a dull blue colour. Mr. Bartlett was much pleased to find the manatee feed so well; she would eat lettuces and vegetable marrows all day. She got quite tame like a sheep, and would follow Mr. Bartlett round the pond and eat from his hand. It was very interesting to remark the extreme quiet with which this animal, one can hardly say swims, but rather gently glides through the water. Its skin is covered with two kinds of hair, soft and bristly. The appearance of the back reminds one of a prickly pear. - The nostrils are most peculiar; they are situated at the extreme end of the nose, and the two valves seem to rise from the inside, with exactly the same quiet motion as does the hydraulic lift when it rises level with the plat- form at the Great Western station; or, again, its action may be likened to the working of the lid of the nest of the trap-door spider. She was supposed to be about half grown. The length of a full-grown manatee is from fourteen to sixteen feet, and the weight would average about 1,500 lbs. This manatee at the Gardens was seven feet two inches long, and weighed about 4 ewt. The price asked for the manatee was 4001. The tail contains a considerable quantity of oil; the natives chop it up and expose it to the sun, they then boil it and get oil, which is pure and not rancid. The old pharmacists prescribed this to cool the blood. It is said to taste like oil of almonds. Dr. Murie weighed the THE MANATEE. 379 fat of this animal for dissection, and found it weigh twenty- four lbs. ten ounces, about one-nineteenth of the total weight of the animal. Another manatee was exhibited at the Westminster Aquarium in 1878. It was captured off an island at the mouth of the Essiquibo River, British Guiana. Since then two young manatees have been exhibited at the Brighton Aquarium. The flesh of the manatee is considered a great delicacy ; when roasted it has the taste of pork with a flavour of veal. It is said to retain its freshness much longer than other meat in a tropical climate, where meat generally putrefies in twenty-eight hours, and to be therefore well adapted for salting or pickling, as the salt has time to penetrate the meat before it is spoiled. The Indians hunt the manatee with harpoons. The cry, Mr. Bates reports, is something like the bellowing of an ox. The natives look upon the manatee as a supernatural animal, because it suckles its young as a human mother does her baby. The Indians say the milk is good. The manatees are said to be whale-like in habit, and when at home to leap out of the water in a whale-like manner; and they were formerly abundant in the en- trances of the Orinocoand the Amazon. They also ascend the rivers and take up their abode in the fresh-water lakes. Formerly they were very abundant in Cayenne, where the flesh was sold for 3d. per pound; but this caused them to be nearly exterminated, like the unhappy dodo. The anatomy of the manatee is another instance of the adaptation of structure to the physical conditions under 380 THE MANATEE. which the animal has to pass its existence. As a writer remarks, ‘The power of swimming which these animals possess not only renders them quite safe from those casualties to which ruminant animals would be subject when the rains and inundations come, but it gives them a facility and a range in their migrations in quest of food which not even the fleetest of the antelopes, or any of the Mammalia which walk upon the earth, can possess. These last are hemmed in by the mountain ridges, by the deserts, and even by the larger rivers, and their march is laborious, and their food is often scanty. The manatee, on the other hand, launched upon the water, buoyant, and at home in that element, can, with- out any fatigue, migrate for thousands of miles whenever such migrations become necessary. In these extended marches they are not restrained even by the sea; for although it is not very probable that vegetable feeders will range the breadth of the ocean, yet it is certain that these animals often pass along the shores to very con- siderable distances. ‘They also have this advantage, that they are far more certain of provisions by the way than the walking animals which migrate on land. In tropical countries there is never any barrenness if there is water, whether that water be a lake, a stream, or the sea; and thus the animals in question can always approach the bank and feed whenever a supply is required.’ In that admirable book, ‘The Naturalist on the Amazons,’ Mr. Bates gives us the following account :— ‘They harpooned a manatee, or Vaccw marina. On this last-mentioned occasion we made quite a holiday; THE MANATEE. 381 the canoe was stopped for six or seven hours, and all turned out into the forest to help to skin and cook the animal. The meat was cut into cubical slabs, and each person skewered a dozen or so of those on a long stick. Fires were made, and the spits stuck in the ground, and slanted over the flames to roast. A drizzling rain fell all the time, and the ground around the fires swarmed with stinging ants, attracted by the entrails and slime which were scattered about. The meat had somewhat the taste of very coarse pork ; but the fat, which lies in thick layers between the lean parts, is of a greenish colour, and of a disagreeable, fishy flavour. The animal was a large one, measuring nearly ten feet in length and nine in girth at the broadest part. The manatee is one of the few objects which excite the dull wonder and curiosity of the Indians, notwithstanding its com- monness. ‘The fact of its suckling its young at the breast, although an aquatic animal resembling a fish, seems to strike them as something very strange. The animal, as it lay on its back, with its broad rounded head and muzzle, tapering body, and smooth, thick, lead-coloured skin, reminded me of those Egyptian tombs which are made of dark, smooth stone, and shaped to the human figure.’ I learn from Kirby’s ‘Bridgewater Treatise’ that Roupell, a traveller in Africa, discovered a species of dugong (the dugong closely resembles the manatee) in the Red Sea, and he is of opinion that it was the skin of this animal with which the Jews were commanded to cover the Tabernacle. a 382 THE MANATEE. In the ‘Proceedings of the Zoological Society,’ vol. viii. p. 127, is a paper by Dr. Murie on the ‘ Anatomy of the Manatee,’ which I consider one of the best he ever published. The skin, says Dr. Murie, claims for the manatee a kindred with the pachyderms. The an- terior face, and particularly the under side, has a very warty surface and pitted structure. This skin is exces- sively thick and strong. The Rev. J. G. Wood writes: ‘So thick and strong is it that the wretched steel of which the native weapons are composed—namely, the machetes, or sword knives—are quite unable to penetrate the hide. Nothing is so effectual a weapon for this service as a common English three-cornered file, which is fastened to a spear- shaft, and pierces through the tough hide with the greatest ease. The skin of the manatee is so thick that it can be cut into strips like the too-celebrated ‘ cow- hide ” of America, which is manufactured from the skin of the hippopotamus.’ The upper lip of the manatee is full and cleft in the middle. It is covered inside with tufts of stiff bristles. Dr. Murie considers that these bristles inside the mouth correspond to and are the homologues of the whalebone in the mouth of the whale. These bristles are pre- hensile, as they will, I find, gently clasp one’s fingers when the manatee can be persuaded to take a lettuce from the hand. I have not had an opportunity of examining the skull of a manatee. Professor Owen in his ‘Odontology’ has figured the teeth. He says they are thirty-six in number, nine on each side of both jaws, They are all implanted by two fangs, which THE MANATEE. 383 - enlarge as they descend and bifurcate at the extremity. The professor continues, ‘ The shape, structure, and mode of implantation of the molars of the manatee quite accord with the pachydermal type, and herein more especially with the tapir and dinotherium,’ a very curious extinct animal, about whose habits very little is known. 384 THE GREAT SHA-SERPENT. In June 1877 the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty received official reports from the officers of the royal yacht ‘Osborne,’ relative to a large marine animal seen off Sicily; the documents were forwarded to the Right Hon. R. A. Cross, Secretary of State for the Home Department, who did me the honour to request my opinion on the matter. This subject being of so much in- terest and importance as bearing on the question of the ex- istence or non-existence of the great sea-snake, I obtained the opinions of Professor Owen, Mr. A. D. Bartlett, of the Zoological Gardens, Captain David Gray, of the whaling ship ‘Eclipse,’ Peterhead, and Mr. Henry Lee. These papers, together with my own opinion, were forwarded to the Lords of the Admiralty, who kindly gave me permis- sion in the interests of science to publish them, together with the evidence of the officers of H.M. yacht ‘ Osborne.’ Commander Pearson, of the Royal yacht ‘ Osborne,’ in forwarding the accounts of the three officers of that yacht, who saw the sea monster off the coast of Sicily on June 2, 1877, writes:—‘ I myself saw the fish through a tele- scope, but at too great a distance (about 400 yards) to be able to give a detailed description; but I distinctly saw the seal-shaped head, of immense size, large flappers, and part of a huge body.’ THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 385 Lieutenant Haynes writes, under date, ‘ Royal Yacht <* Osborne,” Gibraltar, June 6 ; ’—‘ On the evening of June 2, the sea being perfectly smooth, my attention was first ealled by seeing a ridge of fins above the surface of the water, extending about thirty feet, and varying from five to six feet in height. On inspecting it by means of a telescope, at about one and a half cables’ distance,! I dis- tinctly saw a head, two flappers, and about thirty feet of an animal’s shoulder. The head, as nearly as I could judge, was about six feet thick, the neck narrower, about four to five feet, the shoulder about fifteen feet across, and the flappers each about fifteen feet in length. The movements of the flappers were those of a turtle, and the animal resembled a huge seal, the resemblance being strongest about the back of the head. I could not see the length of the head, but from its crown or top to just below the shoulder (where it became immersed) I should reckon about fifty feet. The tail end I did not see, it being under water—unless the ridge of fins to which my attention was first attracted, and which had disappeared by the time I got a telescope, was really the continuation of the shoulder to the end of the body. The animal’s head was not always above water, but was thrown upwards, remaining above for a few seconds at a time, and then disappearing. There was an entire absence of “ blowing ” or “ spouting.” I herewith enclose a sketch (A) showing the view of the “ ridge of fins,” and (B) of the animal in the act of propelling itself by its two fins.’ Lieutenant Douglas M. Forsyth writes, under date, ‘ Royal Yacht “ Osborne,” at sea, June 4, 1877 : ’—‘ At five 1 A cable’s length is 240 yards, CC 388 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. p-m. on the 2nd inst., while passing Cape St. Vito, north coast of Sicily, I observed a large, black-looking object on the starboard quarter, distant about two cables; and on examining it with a telescope, I found it to be a huge monster, having a head about fifteen to twenty feet in length. The breadth I could not observe. The head was round, and full at the crown. The animal was slowly swimming in a south-easterly direction, propelling itself by means of two large flappers or fins, somewhat in the manner of a seal. I also saw a portion of the body of the animal, and that. part was certainly not under forty-five or fifty feet in length.’ Mr. Moore, engineer of the royal yacht ‘ Osborne,’ writes :—‘ When looking over the starboard quarter of the ship, my attention was called by observing an uneven ridge of what appeared to me to be the fins of a fish above the surface of the water, about a cable’s length distance from the ship. They varied in height, as near as I can judge, from seven to eight feet above water, and extended about forty feet along the surface. Not having a telescope with me, I regret Iam unable to give a further descrip- tion.’ I submitted these reports to Professor Owen, who sent me the following as his opinion on the matter:—‘I have carefully perused and considered the documents from the Admiralty and Home Office which you submitted to me. First as to Captain Pearson’s letter. The objects or phe- nomena may have been of a nature unknown to the ob-— servers, but were not necessarily caused by a monster, The appearances may not have been caused by a “ fish.” The expression “ seal shaped head,” “ flappers,” &c., denote H THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 389 rather a cetacean than a “ fish ” or “ monster ;” but, viewed at the distance given, the ideas thereby excited and ex- pressed are of no help or value to the naturalist. Secondly, as to Lieutenant Haynes’ letter:—Phenomena noted through a telescope, at the distance given, by one not conversant with natural history, are very seldom available to one who is; the present case is no exception. The period during which the object was watched, or during which uninterrupted observation of the phenomena was made, should have been noted, in order to found an opinion of the bearing of Lieutenant Haynes’ remarks as to the motion of the animal’s head. Thirdly, as to Lieu- tenant Forsyth’s letter:—A. seal propels itself chiefly by its hind pair of flippers, which stretch backward beyond the tail, to part of which they are attached. Fourthly, as to Mr. Moore’s letter :—Compare this with Lieutenant Forsyth’s statement, and with Lieutenant Haynes’ state- ment. ‘The discrepancies in the records of the watchers of the same phenomena show the difficulty of exact obser- vation at the distances and under the circumstances of the case, both ship and object or objects being on the move; and remarks thereon by observers not conversant with natural history, and so situated, preclude the forma- tion of any opinion worth recording of the nature of the object or objects causing the phenomena as interpreted by the foregoing witnesses. ‘But although the statements and terms applied may be insufficient to enable the naturalist to recognise the subject thereof, they by no means afford ground for con- cluding that what was seen was afforded by an object 390 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. unknown and unrecorded in natural history. There are no grounds for calling it a “sea monster.” I beg to call attention to the paragraph concluding the Manual of Zoology in the Admiralty Manual of Scientific Enquiry, 12mo, 3rd ed., 1859 :—‘* When an object is seen afloat, and attracts notice by its magnitude or other peculiarity, and is not captured, its nearest approach to the ship, its mode, course, and rate of progression, and the parts actually recognisable should be noted at the time with the utmost accuracy. If practicable, a boat should be put off for close observation and possible capture. If the ob-- server nas not the zoological knowledge, or the oppor- tunity for exact inspection, requisite for determining the species from tne phenomena, he should abstain from giving the object any special name. Supposing it to be an animal, a shot fired, if even it do not hit, may so alarm the creature as to cause some sudden movement which may reveal more of its true nature.” ’ Mr. Bartlett’s opinion is as follows :— ‘In undertaking to write my opinion upon the state- ments made in this report, I must endeavour as far as pos- sible to divest myself of the knowledge of all previous” accounts that have from time to time been published upon this subject. ‘Firstly, I think few men holding themselves as honourable and trustworthy officers in Her Majesty’s Ser- vice would risk their high position by any false or fabri- cated story of this nature. I will, therefore, take it for granted that they described to the best of their ability what they saw. ‘Secondly, I have now to consider what appears to me = a THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 391 one very simple matter. All persons, by continual prac- tice in the use of their eyes on land and at sea, acquire a great power in distinguishing and recognising the objects they have constantly under observation, and per- sons accustomed to the sea are most remarkable in this, to them, most important matter; men always on the look-out notice the smallest as well as more important objects, during the long periods they pass watching for something to turn up, and are not likely to mistake the ordinary and common occurrence of the appearance of seals, porpoises, sharks, or whales, for some previously un- seen or unknown monster of the deep. ‘I am therefore willing to admit and believe that some large animal or animals have presented themselves within sight of the officers of the “ Osborne.” ‘My difficulty is to offer some explanation, and ascribe to some kind of animal the description laid before me. It is evidently not a serpent. According to all known species of serpent, none of them have fins or flippers or any exter- nal organs used for swimming, nor does the description agree with any of the seals or sea-lions, as no animal of this kind has fins on the back, nor do they use the eave pers in front while swimming. ‘Sketch (8) at first looks like a monster turtle, but sketch (A) at once dispels this idea. ‘T have now to consider in what respect it resembles the whales and porpoises, and find it quite impossible to pelieve that men who must be well acquainted with the movements and frequent appearance of these creatures could so distort and magnify any of the known kinds into the object they have described. 392 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. ‘Lastly, I come to the sharks. The largest specimens known fail, however, to give me any hope of satisfying myself or any one else that any number of sharks could have led to the report furnished by the officers of the ‘¢ Osborne.” ‘The description fails entirely in so many important points, that one cannot help being struck with the dis- similar appearances presented. ‘I may remark that the fins upon the back give strength to the idea that sharks were the nearest approach to the creature or creatures seen; but the head and neck described at once dispel the thought that any kind of shark could, by any possibility, be mistaken for what was seen. ‘That the sketch (A) represents a sgt of fins like the back fins of sharks; supposing two or three sharks to be in company, would easily be concluded, did not the great height (six or eight feet out of the water) at once dispose of the probability of any known shark hay- ing fins of these dimensions.! ‘TI now feel called upon to answer the question, What was it? ‘IT must, in reply, admit that Iam unable to identify the figures and description with any known animal. With the dimensions given, it is most conclusive—in fact, proof positive—that. no known species of animal was seen, the dimensions being so extraordinary that they admit of no doubt but that the creature is entirely unknown to 1 There are Finner whales and large grampuses with a dorsal fin from four to six feet high. See Dewhurst, Cetacea. The Selache, or basking shark, also has a back fin between five and six feet high, corre- sponding with the dimensions given by Lieutenant Haynes. THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 393 naturalists. But I fully believe in the existence of animals in the deep at present unknown either by specimens or by perfect descriptions ; not only do I accept as true the statements made to the best of the judgment and belief of the parties who have made them, but doubt- less from time to time other wonderful sights have pre- sented themselves, and have remained unrecorded from fear of derision and misbelief; but this, as seen at 400 yards on a clear day, appears so perfectly easy of observa- tion that I cannot doubt the correctness of the statement in sketch (B). ‘When we consider the vast extent of the ocean, its great depth, the rocky, cavernous nature of the bottom— of many parts of which we know really nothing,—who can say what may have been hidden for ages, and may still remain a mystery for generations yet to come? for we have evidence on land that there exist some of the largest mammals, probably by thousands, of which only one solitary individual has been caught or brought to notice. I allude to the hairy-eared two-horned rhinoceros (R. lasvotis ), captured in 1868 at Chittagong (where it was found stranded in the mud), and now known as an in- habitant of the Zoological Gardens. ‘T could find other instances, but content myself by stating that this animal remains unique, and no part or portion was previously known to exist In any museum at home orabroad. We have here an instance of the existence of a species of rhinoceros, as large nearly as the hippo- potamus, found on the continent of India, of which country we in England are supposed to know so much, where for many years collectors and naturalists have 394 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. worked and published lists of all the animals met with, and here they have hitherto failed to meet with or obtain any knowledge of this great beast. | ‘May I not, therefore, presume that, in the vast and mighty ocean, animals, perhaps of nocturnal habits (and therefore never, except by some extraordinary accident, | forced into sight), may exist, whose form may resemble the extinct reptiles whose fossil remains we find in such abundance. i ‘The form indicated and described strongly resembles some of the extinct reptilian characters, and reminds one of the models of fish-lizards and other animals described and constructed by Waterhouse Hawkins, under the direction of Professor Owen, and exhibited in the grounds of the Crystal Palace at Sydenham ; and, as far as I am able to judge from the evidence before me, I have reason to believe that aquatic reptiles of vast size have been seen and described by those persons who have endeavoured to explain what they have witnessed. ‘One thing is certain, that many well-known reptiles have the power of remaining for long periods (months, in fact) at the bottom, under water or imbedded in soft mud, being so provided with organs of circulation and respira- tion that they need not come to the surface to breathe. The large crocodiles, alligators, and turtles have this power, and I see no valid reason to doubt but that there may and do exist, in the unknown regions of the ocean, creatures so constructed. . ‘It may be argued that, if such animals still live, they must from time to time die, and their bodies would float, and their carcasses would be found, or parts of them ‘fie CE THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 395 would wash on shore. To this I say, however reasonable such arguments may appear, that with most animals that die or are killed in the water, they sink at first to the bottom, where they are likely to have the flesh and soft parts devoured by other animals, such as crustacea, fishes, &c., &e.; and sinking in the deep, the bones, being heavier than the other parts, may soon become imbedded, and thus concealed from sight. ‘In conclusion, I cannot shut my eyes to the many reports and statements made from time immemorial by persons far above suspicion of fraud or deception, and whose lives have been, for the most part, spent at sea, and whose knowledge of the appearances of all marine animals commonly seen entitles them to our most serious consideration. ‘These more recent instances recorded by honest and trustworthy persons satisfy me that .it is not only unfair, but unwise, and a great mistake, to disregard and throw overboard, as it were, the evidence brought by these dif- ferent observers, simply because we cannot at present define exactly, by specimens or otherwise, the exact nature of the creatures that have been observed.’ The following is Mr. Henry Lee’s opinion :-— ‘The evidence of “great sea-serpents,” or other so- ealled “*marine monsters,” having been occasionally seen, is such as would be regarded as valid and cogent in any court of justice. The witnesses are trustworthy as to character, and competent by training and experience. The officers of Her Majesty’s Navy are incapable of com- bining together to officially and intentionally promulgate falsehood; and they and the seamen under their command 396 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT, are too much accustomed to the sights of the sea to be > eusily misled, either to greatly exaggerate the dimensions of an animal in view, or to be so entirely deceived by appearances as not to recognise one already known to them. It appears to me, therefore, that, with such testi- mony before us, incredulity (which is more frequently than credence the result of want of knowledge) is un- justifiable; and that the statements and descriptions of such witnesses ought to be frankly accepted and carefully considered, with a view to satisfactory explanation, if that be possible. ‘It should be remembered that the existence of gi- gantic cuttle-fishes was popularly disbelieved until within the past five or six years, during which period several specimens—some of them fifty feet in total length—have been taken, and all doubts upon that subject have been removed. ‘In more than one case the appearance of the “ sea- monsters ” described by masters of merchant vessels almost exactly accords with that of these great squids. These decapods are pelagic in their habits, and must not be confounded, as they too often are, with the octopods, which are rock-dwellers. ‘In another case I agree with Professor Owen and Captain Gray, that the appearance of a whale attacked by a sea-serpent, as seen by the crew of the barque “ Pauline,” on July 8, 1875, in lat. 5° 13’ S., long9367 Weer ae possibly be attributed to the movements of two whales rolling over and over. But the animal described by Com- mander Pearson and the officers of the Royal yacht (Ysborne,” and that seen by Captain McQuhae of H.M.S8. THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 397 “ Dedalus” in 1848, do not come within the scope of either of these suppositions. Lieutenant Haynes and Mr. Forsyth report that the former had flappers fifteen feet long, the movements of which were like those of a turtle; and Captain McQuhae says of the latter that it kept its head, which was, “without any doubt,” that of a snake, constantly about four feet above the surface of the sea; that there was, at the very least, sixty. feet of the animal @ fleur deau, and that it passed so near to the vessel’s quarter that, although it was swimming at the rate of from twelve to fifteen miles an hour, if it had been a man of his acquaintance he could easily have recognised his features with the naked eye. Neither whales nor sharks use their pectoral fins, or flippers, to swim with—their sole organ of propulsion is the tail; neither do they uplift out of water a head like that of a snake. I believe, therefore, that in both of these in- stances an animal has been seen which is either totally unknown to science, or which has hitherto been believed to be extinct. ‘Other appearances described cannot be explained away as having been produced by sharks, whales, seals, cuttles, ribbon-fish, or logs of wood covered with barnacles and seaweed; and to insist on attributing them to one of these, or some other familiar object, is to assume that the stay-at-home naturalist has perfect cognizance of every existing murine animal of large size, and that the sea- going eye-witness is so inexperienced and uninstructed that his assertion that what he saw was none of these is worthless. I cannot regard such an assumption in either case as warrantable. 328 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT, ‘During the deep-sea dredgings of H.M.S. “ Light- ning,” “ Porcupine,” and “ Challenger,” many new species of Mollusca, and others which had been supposed to have been extinct ever since the Chalk epoch, were brought to light ; and by the deep-sea trawlings of the last-mentioned ship there were drawn up from great depths fishes of unknown species, and which could not exist near the surface, owing to the distention and rupture of their air-bladder when removed from the pressure of deep water. ‘I therefore think it by no means impossible—first, that there may be gigantic marine animals unknown to science, having their ordinary habitat in the great depths of the sea, only occasionally coming to the surface, and perhaps avoiding habitually the light of day; and, second, that.there may still exist, though supposed to have been long since extinct, some of the old sea-reptiles whose fossil remains tell of their magnitude and habits, or others of species unknown even to paleontologists. ‘The evidence is, to my mind, conclusive that enor- mous animals, with which zoologists are at present un- acquainted, exist in the “‘ great and wide sea; ” and I look forward hopefully to the capture of one or more of them, and the settlement of this vexed question.’ Such were the opinions I received. For many years past I have taken the greatest interest in the reports of so-called sea-snakes. There are certainly snakes in the sea. These are generally very poisonous. They can be known from land snakes by having a flat tail for the pur- pose of swimming. I am, however, myself by no means a believer in the so-called ‘ great sea-snake.’ If such an animal existed, upon what can it subsist ? wget A 6 RES Ley} . ert as = Pears —w THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 399 Where does it live? How does it multiply? and above all, how is it that the remains, especially the bones, are never found? Dead whales and whales’ bones are often found, why not also the remains of the ‘sea-snakes’ (so called) if they had any existence. According to Professor Owen’s lectures, which I at- tended years ago, unknown monsters at sea have, when boats have been lowered to examine them, turned out to be—First, small whales or porpoises ; second, seals; third turtles, swimming respectively in Indian file one after the other, probably in the act of migrating. Congers or a line of congers may also have given origin to the story. Some ‘sea-snakes’ have turned out to be logs of wood, more or less covered with seaweed and barnacles, or else trees floating with the roots uppermost. These objects moving with the rise and fall of the waves would give the appearance of a living animal with a mane. The Gymmetrus, or ‘ Banks’ oar-fish,’ as well as the ribbon-fish, is also liable to be taken for a sea-snake. A bone, supposed to be that of a great sea-snake, was found in Bermuda. It turned out to be the body spine of a gymnetrus. I have received from Nice a specimen of a ribbon- fish. A coloured cast, as well as the specimen itself, can be inspected in my ‘Museum of Economic Fish Cul- ture,’ South Kensington. In June 1877 a lady at Tenby saw an object which she took to be a kind of sea-serpent. In course of conversation with this lady, I came to the conclusion that what she saw was a very large octopus or cuttle- fish, swimming as it generally does, viz., with the pear- ’ 400 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. shaped body going front, the long tentacles following on behind. In my Museum of Fish Culture, South Ken- sington, is a model of a huge cuttle cut out in wood, quite large enough to give the appearance seen by this _ lady. In September 1872 I received through the Duke of Marlborough, an account of a ‘ sea-serpent’ seen in Loch Hourn, Scotland, on the 20th and 21st August 1872, by the Rev. David Twopeny, late vicar of Stockbury, Kent, and by the Rev. John Macrae, late minister of Glenelg, Invernesshire, and his two daughters. In describing this monster Mr. Twopeny says :— ‘We saw it repeatedly for two days together in the Sound of Sleat, between Skye and the mainland, and in the opening of Loch Hourn. The weather was still and hot, and the sea like glass, and it is in such hot still days in August that it is described as being seen in the large Norwegian fiords, not often in the open sea. The head always appeared first, then the part next to the head, and then the rest, one bit after another, to the end. The greatest number of these convolutions, as the books call them, was eight including the head; they always ap- peared regularly, one after the other, beginning next the head, but when they disappeared they all sank together leaving the head visible. It appeared to be basking and often moved slowly, but sometimes with great rapidity, and when at the most rapid rate, these convolutions dis- appeared. We had three binocular glasses on board, and | four people capable of observing. ‘When first we saw it, it was going on at a very leisurely rate, and we saw it capitally, when it suddenly THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 401 turned and came towards us ; but when at about 100 yards (as Mr. M. computed, and he is a very accurate observer), it turned off. It was never nearer to us thanthis. They were getting the cutter on with sweeps both days, and it repeatedly came towards us, as if attracted by the rowing. Once on the second day it rushed along at a great rate, scarcely any of it visible, but making a tremendous rush through the water, and the noise was quite audible on board, the sea being quite still, and no wind. As to the size, it must be a good deal guesswork, but if one of the convolutions was six feet (and I can hardly think they could be less), and the intervals between the same, and six feet under water at the tail, it would be ninety-six feet. Many of the Norwegian accounts compute it to be considerably longer. They speak of its appearance being like a string of barrels, and that is just what this looked like. When I saw it the second day a good way off in the opening of Loch Hourn, I thought that if there was a vessel of that length it would be a large one. From that point it was on the second day more or less within sight of us till dusk, going on northwards, as we were going, towards the Kyle Rhea Skye Ferry; and we heard the next day that it passed the ferry with a rushing sound, which was heard by the people on shore. This creature is totally different from the animal which Captain McQuhae saw in 1848, and which he declared was a sea- serpent, but Professor Owen believed it to be a large seal. There is scarcely a probability but that thisisaserpent. I imagine it raises its back to sun itself, and then straightens itself to go quickly. As it was approaching us at the nearest I plainly saw the sea running off its back and the back DD THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT.. 403 of its head, as it does from a low flat rock which has been submerged by a wave. F. M. was frightened out of her wits, thinking it was coming down upow us; and between that and the dangers of the sea—for she is always fright- ened in a boat—she insisted afterwards: on being landed at half-past two in the morning, and walked home by herself in the moonlight, thirteen miles over wild moun- tain tracks. Mr. M., who is a great naturalist, is greatly interested about the creature. He has all his life been going about on these seas, but never saw or heard any- thing of the kind before. He knew Mr. Maclean, the minister of Eig, who saw it off Coll in June 1808, and says he was quite a man to be believed. They wellsknow all the sea creatures here, whales, porpoises,. seals, and say there is not the slightest resemblance in them to this animal; and I have seen porpoises repeatedly, and very different they are. ‘Last summer Mr. M. heard that some unknown animal was rushing about Loch Derich with great rapidity for several days, and he imagines it must have been such a one as we saw. ‘A word more about “the beast,” as we call it here. F. thought that the tumult of the water about the neck was occasioned by a mane lashing about, and it might well have been that, as far as the appearance of the water went, but I saw no mane. The head appeared flattish, and I saw distinctly under the chin, as shown in the sketch. We could not see the eye. Mr. M. says very truly, that I shall get the curves more accurately by draw- ing the whole of the curves, under water and all. In the sketch they are misshapen, and a little too high. These pDzZ 404 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. convolutions rose easily, and not with a jerk— sometimes three, then four—always one after the other, lying next the head. The largest number I counted was six. Mr. M., who is very accurate, at one time counted eight, including the head. On the second day, in the latter part of the day, as we were going home in the Sound of Sleat, and the beast at a distance, going about and about, but still the same way, two of our party were both positive that they saw a back fin stick up, when not a very great part of the creature was visible. I did not see it, for I was perfectly tired out, and not any longer observing. If the fin exists, it must at other times have been in one of the submerged parts. I am very curious about this creature, and should much like to know what other people have seen. The first day Mr. Lillingstone’s large schooner yacht was becalmed all day in the Sound with us, that is, from one to ‘two miles off, and I think the people on board must have seen it. They had with them a steam launch, a noisy concern, with which they were always going about, and that may have kept it off. ‘At the distance we saw it the colour appeared black. When the beast was first seen Kate M. said that the dark ridges were waves caused by the motion of the animal, such as might be in the wake of a steamer; but she soon abandoned this opinion, and I was satisfied, as I looked at it, that this was perfectly impossible. The creature was to the north of us, opposite to the sun, which was shining strongly at half-past twelve. No wave could have looked like that on the light side, with the sun shining upon it ; nor do I believe a wave could have been nearly so black with the sun shining behind it. The moment the least frag- THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 405 ment appeared, it looked inky black, like the head, as dark as a black slug, and totally different from anything in the water; and I was quite sure that no wave, even in shadow, could have looked like that. The next evening we had a ripple in the still sea in long dark lines between — us and the sun. I was curious to see how far the creature _ would have been deeper in tone than these lines if he had passed among them then; but the only time he appeared just then was when he passed with an audible rush; scarcely any part of him was visible, and that had water rushing overit. Throughout, whenever he appeared, there was the same blackness, like a black slug, different from anything around. Two gentlemen have been here, from Fig, who have been cruising about the Hebrides for several weeks. One of them said that when he lived in Eig, he believed he had struck a thing of this kind; but Mr. M., on his describing it, said he had no doubt it was a basking shark, which is seen here sometimes. That creature has no power of raising its back in curved ridges like this.’ ! A case was published in the papers in 1875 giving an account of a ‘ great sea-snake’ attacking a whale. My friend Captain Gray tells me that this appearance of the snake curled round the whale was doubtless due to the appearance and reappearance of the fins of a large whale, rolling over and over. The hunchback whale has very long fins, ten to fifteen feet in length, and sometimes when they are playing about, they would present the same appearance as was shown in the ‘ Illustrated London News’ some time since, in which was represented a serpent at~ tacking a whale. 1 An account of this appearance was also published by Rev. J. Macrae and Rev. D. Twopeny in the Zvologist for May 1873. = = we ; YaLVYM AHL WAOGVY YNILODLCOYd SNIA HLIM MUVHS PNINSVA ‘ey “OT a OMIT SFL Uh THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. 407 I must now give my opinion on the sea monster as seen by the officers of the yacht ‘Osborne.’ That they observed portions of some living creature or creatures is quite evident, but query, What was its or their true nature ? Possibly I may be wrong, but my theory is that the phenomenon was caused by three or four basking sharks swimming ina line one behind the other. The dorsal and caudal or tail fins of these huye fish projecting above the surface of the water might give the appearance shown in the drawing opposite, which I have had made as an illus- tration of my theory. It is a sketch of the basking shark now at the British Museum. This specimen is twenty- eight feet long, and the skin weighed over one ton. The height of the dorsal fin was five feet three inches, length of upper lobe of tail five feet nine inches, length of pec- toral fin along anterior margin five feet three inches.! I have drawn a line to show that if the fish were on the surface of the water the dorsal and tail fins B and E would project five or six feet into the air.” 1 Land and Water, vol. xx.,p. 177. The fins have now somewhat shrunk. 2 The basking shark derives this name from its habit of remaining at the surface of the water almost motionless basking in the sun. It is sometimes called the sail-fish, from the ‘sail-like aspect of its dorsal fin, which projects high out of water’ (Wood’s Natural History). It is often found in the Mediterranean. Spallanzani describes several kinds, and says they are found of great size in the summer in the Straits of Messina. Sometimes it is seen on the English coast; the British Museum specimen was cast ashore near Ventnor in March 1875. They occur frequently off the west coast of Ireland, especially on a bank about a hundred miles west of Clew Bay, Ireland, where on sunny days in April and May they appear in great numbers, their dorsal fins being seen at a distance rising several feet out of water as they lie motionless basking in the sun (F. Buckland’s Natural History of British Fishes, p. 216). Cuvier says they sometimes attain a length of more than 408 THE GREAT SEA-SERPENT. The grampus and sword-fish are not uncommon in the seas near Sicily, and a herd of either of these may possibly have given origin to the phenomenon. I agree with my friend Mr. Bartlett, that the captain and officers of the ‘ Osborne’ deserve the thanks of naturalists and the public for giving their reports of this marine phenomenon. When at Peterhead, on the Herring Inquiry, August 28, 1877, I had a long interview with my friend Gray. Captain Gray has had upwards of thirty years’ experience in killing whales and seals in the Greenland seas and Baffin’s Bay. He informs me that a full-grown whalebone whale (Balena mysticetus) would measure fifty to fifty- five feet in length. Scoresby, writing in 1830, mentions a whale fifty-eight feet in length. This was the longest he killed among 300 individuals. Gray says the appear- ance in the second figure given by the officer of the ‘Osborne’ closely represents a Greenland whale going away from the spectator. The whale however has not the power to bring up his fins as represented; neither are they of the same shape, or half the size. A whale’s fin re- sembles a human hand with a mitten on. e a, .§ a ah ; f _ : ““ € * * bal ‘sb oh ee i ee ee See " Prt one u ee 3 \ ie ae oe oe : om i eee aoe | ‘THE GREAT SBACSERPENT, 7 cet se heroine: seen fon ae) . — in July 1875, and the officers of the Osborne? n June 1877. havea dozen or more so-called sea-serpents.! Fan ‘rom the above I think we may conclude that, Grate és ever the sea-serpent may be, it generally appears in the hot months of the year from June to September, and this is all that I have to say about the great sea-snake at the present, wishing from the bottom of my heart that some one would catch it. I need not say how delighted I should be to have the job to cast and dissect it, and see how it — eats. . iat 1 See also Sir Charles Lyell. Second Visit to the United States, vol. i. p. 131. London, 1849. Gosse, Romance ce Ne! History, vol. 1. pv. 275. London, 1880. ¥. ; ra “¥ - “! LONDON : PRINTED BY ‘SPOTTISWOODE AND CO,, NEW-STREET SQUARE AND das amen be STREET - a on” rae «= , 7 “SMITH, ELDER, & C0.'S PUBLICATIONS. ‘THIS VERY DELIGHTFUL BOOK,—PALL MALL GAZETTE. THIRD EDITION. * With a Portrait. .2 vols. crown 8vo. 18s. MEMORIES OF OLD FRIENDS: Being Extracts from the Journals _ ~ and pee age Fox, of Penjerrick, Cornwall, from 1835 to 1871. To which are adde ourteen ORIGINAL LETTERS from J. S. MIL, never bef ishec Edited by HORACE N. PYM. - ii. So ara ' “There are not many things rarer than a thoroughly delightful book, but Mr. Pym must - have the credit (since the author herself is past receiving it) of having provided readers of to-day with this rarity. —ATHEN ZUM. IRISH ESSAYS AND OTHERS. By Marruew Arnotp. Crown ‘ 8vo. 7s. 6d. CoNTEN''s :—The Incompatibles —An Unregarded Irish Crievance—Kcce, Converti Gentes—The Future of Liberalism—A Speech at Eton—The French Play in Tondiones Copyright—Prefaces to Poems. THE SCIENCE OF ETHICS: an Essay upon Ethical Theory as modified by the Doctrine of Evolution. By Luestiz SrEpHen, Author of ‘A History of iatee Thought in the Highteenth Century,’ ‘Hours in a Library,’ &«. Demy 8vo. lés. UNDER THE SANCTION OF HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. THE ‘PEOPLHE’S EDITION’ OF THE LIFE of HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS the PRINCE CONSORT, By SIR THEODORE MARTIN, K.C.B. With a Portrait, bound in cloth, 4s. 6d. *4* The work may also be obtained in Six Parts, each 6d, LORD MACAULAY, ESSAYIST AND HISTORIAN. By the Hon. ALBERT 8S. G. CANNING, Author of ‘ The Philosophy of Charles: Dickens,’ ‘Religious Strire in British History,’ &ec. Crown 8vo 6s. : __. NEW AND CHEAPER EDITION OF BRANDRAM’S SHAKESPEARE. SHAKESPEARE.—_CERTAIN SELECTED PLAYS, Abridged for the Use of the Young. By SamMugL BRANDRAM, M.A., Oxon. Second Edition. Large crown 8vo. 6s. OUTLINES OF NAVAL HYGIENE. By Joun D. Macponatp, © M.D., F.R.S., Inspector-General R.N., Professor of Naval Hygiene, Army Medical School, Netley. Crown 8vo. with Illustrations, 12s. 6d. *This handy volume supplies a want that has long been cymplained of by naval medical Officers, and we hope that our remarks will not fail to gain for it an opinion of general, second to that only of its professional utility, as such knowledge, so clearly and so concisely put, will, by wise diffusion, acquire strength as it spreads, and so prove highly beneficial to our navy.’—UNITED SERVICE GAZETTE. SIX MONTHS IN THE RANKS; or, the Gentleman Private. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. ‘A book like this should be very valuable to army administrators, and to parliamentary army reformers.’—BRITISH QUARTERLY REVIEW. 7 EXTRACTS FROM THE WRITINGS OF W. M. THACKERAY. Chiefly Philosophical and Reflective. Second Edition. With a Portrait. Crown 8vo, 7s. 6d. GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE VOLCANIC ISLANDS AND PARTS OF SOUTH AMERICA, visited during the voyage of H.M 8. ‘Beagle.’ By CHARLES DARWIN, M.A., F.R.S. A New Edition, with Maps and Illus- trations. Crown 8vo. 12s. 6d. LIFE WITH THE HAMRAN ARABS: a Sporting Tour of some Officers of the Guards in the Soudan during the Winter 1874-75. By ARTHUR B. R. MYERS, Surgeon, Coldstream Guards. With Photographic Illustrations. Crown Svo. 12s. TANTLER’S SISTER AND OTHER UNTRUTHFUL STORIES. Being a Collection of Pieces Written for Public Reading. By Epwarp F. TuRNER, Author of ‘T. Leaves.’ Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. London: SMITH, ELDER, & CO , 15 Waterloo Place. vy A ot ae ee OT oe a F Sn ae a: na % aw oe N he 4 W. M. THACKERAY’S WORKS. eee OO THE EDITION DE LUXE. Twenty-four Volumes, impose 3 8vo. Containing 248 Steel Engravings, 1,473 Wood Engravings, and 88 Coloured |. Illustrations: The steel and wood engravings are all printed on real China : ar paper. The NUMBER of COPIES PRINTED is LIMITED to ONE THOU- SAND, each copy being numbered. The Work can only be obtained erouey Booksellers, who will furnish information regarding terms, &c.. 7 » THE LIBRARY EDITION. With Illustrations by the Author, RICHARD DOYLE, and FREDERICK WALKER. Twenty-two Volumes, large crown 8vo. handsomely bound in cloth, price £8. 5s.; or half-russia, marbled edges, £12. 12s. - *% The Volumes are sold separately, in cloth, price 7s. 6d. each ; or in boards, 6s. 6d. each. THE POPULAR EDITION. 12 vols. crown 8vo. with Frontispiece to each volume, scarlet cloth, gilt top, price £33; and in half-morocco, price £5. 5s. *,%* The Volumes are sold separately, in green cloth, price 5s, each. - * NEW AND CHEAPER ILLUSTRATED EDITION. In Twenty- four Volumes, crown 8vo. price 3s. 6d. each. In Sets of Twenty-four Volumes, uniformly bound in cloth, price £4. 4s. ; or handsomely bound in half-morocco, . price £8. Containing nearly all the small Woodcut Illustrations of the former Editions and many New Illustrations by Eminent Artists. ‘THIS EDITION CONTAINS ALTOGETHER 1,626 ILLUSTRATIONS By the AUTHOR; LUKE FiupsEs, A.R.A.; Mrs. BUTLER (Miss Elizabeth Thompson) ; GEORGE DU MAuRIER; RICHARD DoYLE; FREDERICK WALKER, A.R.A.; GEORGE CRUIKSHANK 3} JOHN LEECH ; FRANK DICKSEE ; LINLEY SAMBOURNE; F, BARNARD ; E. J. WHEELER; F. A. FRASER ; CHARLES KEENE; R. B. WALLACE ; a P. ATKINSON 3} : W. J. WEBB; T. R. Macquoip; M. FITZGERALD } W. RALSTON ; JOHN COLLIER ; : H. FURNISS ; : 'a.G. KILBURNE, &e., &c., &c BALLADS. By Wituam Makepeace THackeray. With a Portrait of the Author, and 56 Illustrations by the Author; Mrs, BUTLER (Miss Elizabeth Thompson); GEORGE DU MAURIER; JOHN COLLIER; H. FuRNISS; G. G. KILBURNE; M. FiITzGERALD; and J. P. ATKINSON. Printed on toned paper by Clay, Sons, & Taylor; and elegantly bound in cloth, gilt edges, by Burn. Small 4to. 16s. W. M. THACKERAY’S SKETCHES. THEH ORPHAN OF PIMLIOO, and other Sketches, Frag- ments, and Drawings. By WILLIAM MAKEPEACE THACKERAY. Copied by a process that gives a faithful reproduction of the originals. With a Preface and Editorial Notes by Miss Thackeray. A New Hdition, in a new style of binding, bevelled boards, gilt edges, royal 4to. price One Guinea. London: SMITH, ELDER, & CO., 15 Waterloo Place. pon SESS ~ < SASSER = SR Sate A ERS ANE Spe SSS : Se SSS SSA SS SS SENOS Se shard sane Saas woke 5 < Sy x ee etsy RS SO SS oak