ART 
 
 ERUVIAN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 435 
 
 1ELP FOR STUDENTS OF DESIGN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ye 2 
 * 
 welt ‘ . 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Ce ment ? 
 o = — ~s a th Wed em 
 . RRS «oe ee pen 
 — wh Son 
 & Sh me SS ~ 
 este os Perr ae oe 
 X 4 Shans 
 = = DEERE i Cem 
 ako fa oad So = 
 Sr 
 ro - “Prams 
 ~~. Sar 
 Deen ; 
 as er les 
 parmhacn eran gents, < — de 
 oe 
 a ete = RRS 
 bos . 
 eter Ae eS ene SST. Caer 
 mestreny 2! BS 
 oe 
 mecca ants 
 Sanya) 
 Be Shots 
 Saisisba ys soovvsaes e>| 
 athe me et NERS RC 
 Sy TN, — 
 a pee ee teag’ Ol ” 
 = meighieilalns-« al sd, SRE der Le 
 meade aS Wea 
 * rion Say. ERASE 
 : DY Strertarcsnncs 
 Re Se Sermons 
 6 Gece trae (OED Sar BF encticctatine 
 eo eee er“ aeaake- > 
 r a3 ROE 
 nd ~ 9 i 
 oe x 
 é cs <8 
 : erie wat 
 Bieotyren fear : 3 
 _ a 
 = outs? 
 be 
 ‘ if pareeeneyy « — 
 ft Sine i ~ 
 — : ; 
 Ray =. . 
 enn nee oe ‘ : ‘ Ps 
 neal q - is 
 SNS : 
 ge Pr aaa ¥ 
 sige oh . 
 ea ae 
 Bess, = ee 
 enced > ERT : ; F 
 a & 2 Temi sine Fes ‘ ; 
 - ene Ens 
 = bree a ysis i aes = re : 
 ir ; 
 i 4 ; 
 ‘ : 3 % 4 
 : o ani ero ‘ y 
 eS. fee sain ye i A J 
 hat eye eS yt ; 2 
 
 
 
 No. 46e cs eat 
 
 y 
 
 _ MARCH, 1925 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 - 
 \ 
 ‘ . 
 bs A 
 ‘ ‘ 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 POTTERY VESSELS FROM NAZCA, PERU 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 AS SHOWN ON 
 
 PE SHEES AND POTTERY 
 
 BY 
 CHARLES W. MEAD 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _ FOURTH, ENLARGED EDITION 
 
 The American Museum of Natural History 
 
 GUIDE LEAFLET No. 46 
 
 NEW YORK, MARCH, 1925 
 PRINTED AT THE MUSEUM 
 

 
 “=e 
 
 
 
 . 
 
 o 
 4 
 
 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 A HELP FOR STUDENTS OF DESIGN 
 By CHARLES W. MEAD 
 Assistant Curator, Department of Anthropology 
 
 
 
 INTRODUCTION 
 
 The Museum’s collections of textiles and pottery vessels from pre- 
 historic graves in Peru provide an opportunity for the study of primitive 
 art that is not excelled, if, indeed, it is equaled in any other field.. The 
 great beauty of the color schemes and the wonderful number of curious 
 conventionalized animal figures, especially in the textiles, make these 
 exhibits particularly valuable to the student of design. That this 
 opportunity exists and that the Museum authorities as a part of their 
 educational system are providing all the assistance and comfort possible 
 to visiting artists and students are fast becoming known, as shown by 
 the fact that for quite a number of years an average of one hundred and 
 fifty a month have availed themselves of this privilege, while during the 
 last few years that number has been doubled. 
 
 As a large part of the students of design who make use of these 
 textiles expect later to obtain positions in textile houses, carpet, rug, or 
 wall paper manufactories, or to enter into some other business where 
 designers are employed, it will interest and encourage them to know that 
 many textile houses have lately put upon the market silks and other 
 materials decorated with designs inspired by the figures and color 
 schemes of the prehistoric Peruvians. Our large textile manufacturers 
 have, year after year, sent their best artists to Paris for designs, having 
 no idea that such a wealth of material, eminently suitable for decora- 
 tion, was waiting for them in the Museum so near at hand. 
 
 In the past five years many of these textile manufacturers have 
 visited the Museum and have become aware of the existence of these col- 
 lections. Having once seen them they were by no means slow in recog- 
 nizing their value and in sending their artists to copy the color schemes 
 and create designs from the decorative figures of the ancient Peruvians. 
 Having satisfied themselves of the commercial value of the Peruvian 
 collections to them, they naturally began to look about for the decora- 
 tive work of other primitive peoples and today their designers may be 
 seen at work in many of the Museum halls. 
 
 3 
 
AMERICAN MUSEUM GUIDE LEAFLET 
 
 In a Guide Leaflet it will not be possible to go far in the peculiar art 
 of the Peruvians, and but comparatively few of the innumerable designs 
 can be shown. ‘Their color schemes, which excite the wonder and 
 admiration of artists, must be seen on the original webs, but enough 
 designs can be reproduced to show the general character of this side 
 of their art. 
 
 It always gives an added zest to the work when we know something 
 about the material from which we are drawing and for this reason it will 
 not be out of place to say a few words about the history of these cloths. 
 They all come from prehistoric graves; many of them were found still on 
 the mummies when the burial places were excavated. A greater part of 
 them came from the coast region which is a desert tract except for the 
 valleys of the small rivers rising in the Cordillera and flowing into the 
 Pacific Ocean. These valleys were very fertile and there the people 
 lived and buried their dead in the dry nitrous sand outside. Rain is 
 all but unknown in this region, which accounts for the wonderful state 
 of preservation in which these webs have come down to us. 
 
 The first question that naturally suggests itself to the visitor is— 
 How old are these things? This question cannot be definitely answered. 
 All that can be said is that they antedate the Conquest (1532); that they 
 belong to different epochs, and that the oldest in all probability date 
 back several thousand years. In two papers published by the Museum, 
 my associate, Mr. M. D. C. Crawford, has given the results of his studies 
 in the technique of Peruvian textiles. To these anyone interested in 
 that subject is referred.! | 
 
 It is a very common mistake to speak of such a collection of Peruvian 
 textiles as the work of the Incas, for by far the greater part of them were 
 made by the so-called Megalithic people who ruled the country many 
 centuries before the rise of the Inca empire. 
 
 Four motives continually occur in Peruvian decorations: the human 
 figure, the bird, the fish, and the puma. These were everywhere em- 
 ployed throughout the country in designs which varied somewhat in the 
 different localities, showing that their arts had developed along slightly 
 different lines. 
 
 In studying the designs more space will be given to the figures de- 
 rived from the fish than to those from the other motives. The reason 
 
 
 
 1Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 12, 
 Parts 3-4. : 
 
 4 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 for this is that the designs from the other three motives very rarely show 
 degeneration to the extent that their identity is not apparent, while 
 many of the fish figures have progressed so far that to recognize the 
 motive one must be familiar with some of the stages through which it had 
 passed in reaching its present form. 
 
 The writer does not wish to convey the idea that degeneration of any 
 animal form constantly progressed, step by step, at every repetition 
 losing a little more of its realistic appearance until its character could 
 not be recognized. <A series of figures could be selected from the vast 
 number at our command that would apparently show such progres- 
 sion and this has often been done for the primitive art of other localities, 
 but this method is very misleading, as the higher conventionalized forms 
 were undoubtedly reached by mutations instead of steady progressions. 
 
 Many of the sketches on the Plates of this Leaflet were made at 
 various times during the past fifteen years for various papers, illustrated 
 catalogue cards, and other purposes. Every design shown will be found 
 in the exhibition cases in the South American Hall. 
 
 mh 
 With, 
 
 a) 
 
 PeaiMn, 
 
 uur) 
 y 4 
 
 4 
 Ina 
 
 i 
 
 oY @ 
 AN 
 
 ) 
 
 \as/, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS PERUVIAN DESIGNS 
 5 
 
PLATE I 
 
 ago0g00 
 
 
 
 THE FISH 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 THEY RISH 
 PLaTE I 
 
 The Peruvians of the coast region worshipped the sea as one of their 
 gods, and the fish being the natural emblem of the sea, undoubtedly 
 accounts for the frequency with which it appears in all their arts. We 
 find it woven, embroidered, and painted on cloth; molded, incised, and 
 painted on pottery; and represented in various ways on their works in 
 metal, wood, stone, and bone. I shall show some of the conventionalized 
 figures that plainly represent fish; others that I have found, during my 
 long experience with art students, where the fish motive is very rarely 
 suspected, and some intermediate figures that I believe will enable the 
 student to recognize this motive in the higher forms of Peruvian art. 
 The -first three figures on this Plate plainly represent fish, although 
 degeneration has made considerable progress. They are shown as if 
 seen from above, a common way of representing fish with many primitive 
 peoples. 
 
 Fig. 1 is painted on a large piece of cloth which formed the outer 
 wrapping of amummy bundle from Surco. It is painted in black except 
 the curved line representing the gill openings and the fins. The six 
 small squares show the dorsal fin. 
 
 Fig. 2 is a very common form, in fact the typical Peruvian fish. 
 If we study carefully all the forms on Plates I and II we shall find that 
 the greater part of them are but modifications of this figure. We shall 
 find the number of points projecting from the sides more or less, or two 
 fish derived from this form interlocked, as shown in Fig. 7. 
 
 Fig. 3 is from the wrappings of a mummy bundle found in the 
 vicinity of Lima. The lines representing gill openings are straight in 
 this case. The characteristic projecting points from the sides are present. 
 
 Fig. 4 is a design not uncommon in tapestry from the coast region in 
 the vicinity of Lima. It consists of four fish heads, in colors, sur- 
 rounding a fret. During the many years that design students have 
 worked from these Peruvian collections, I do not remember a single case 
 in which the fish motive was suspected in this figure until I had made it 
 clear by drawing the forms shown in Figs. 5 and 6. The character 
 of such a design when it is woven in the cloth, in a variety of colors, is 
 by no means as easily recognized as when drawn on paper in black and 
 white. 
 
PLATE II 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ge Gai. 
 One? 
 
 
 
 THE FISH 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 Figs. 5-6. Fig. 5 is a tracing of the upper fish head in Fig. 4. Fig. 
 6 was made from the same tracing, but in inking it, straight lines down 
 from the mouth were substituted for the step-form ones of Fig. 5, and 
 this gives us exactly the same head as seen in the fish form at Fig. 2. 
 These step-form lines, caused by the technique of weaving, often dis- 
 guise a form that would be obvious if the lines were straight. 
 
 Fig. 7 shows the interlocked fish design, a form of decoration very 
 common over most of the coast region, where it 1s found on borders of 
 ponchos, belts, etc. In the poncho border from which this figure was 
 taken the decoration is in diagonal bands, each band having two colors. 
 The black fish shown is interlocked with one in red. The bands on either 
 side are in different colors. A repetition of the same figure, but in 
 different colors, arranged either in rows or, as in this illustration, in 
 diagonal bands, is a prominent characteristic of Peruvian art. If we 
 examine any one of these fish we find that such parts of it as can be 
 seen when another is interlocked with it are like the typical one shown 
 in Bic.. 2, 
 
 FPHE FISH 
 Puiate IT 
 
 Fig. 1 gives us another form of the interlocked fish design. We see 
 here attached to the tail of each fish a form bounded on one side by a 
 straight line and on the other by a zigzag forming four chevrons or points. 
 This added figure plays quite a part in Peruvian art, as we shall see 
 when we come to discuss their bird forms. 
 
 Fig. 2 was traced from the black fish above. If two forms like this 
 are cut from paper, and one of them colored black, they will, on being 
 put together, give the design shown. This form is often found and 
 sometimes a bird head takes the place of the half of a fish head shown 
 here. On turning back to Plate I and looking at the typical fish in Fig. 
 2 we find that one is but a skeleton or part of the other. 
 
 Fig. 3 is also a part of the design above, and is frequently used in 
 decoration just as it is shown here. 
 
 Fig. 4 is an example of their work in pyrography. This design was 
 burned into the side of a gourd bowl. The figure spoken of before: one 
 bounded on one side by a straight line and on the other by a zigzag, 
 forms all but the head of this highly conventionalized fish. It varies 
 
 9 
 
AMERICAN MUSEUM GUIDE LEAFLET 
 
 but little from those shown in Figs. 3 and 6, and has the triangular head 
 of Fig. 10. Triangular heads are very common in cloth and on pottery 
 fish forms. 
 
 Fig. 5 is another variation in the interlocked fish pattern. As the 
 heads, tails, and crude outlines of the bodies of fish, as the Peruvians 
 represented them, are shown, there has never been any trouble about 
 identifying the true motive. 
 
 Figs. 6 and 7 are in relief on pottery vessels. They show again the 
 fondness of the Peruvians for the interlocked design. In Fig. 6 each 
 fish is the same as Fig. 3, which has an extra projecting point. The 
 number of points in the body of a fish or bird was governed entirely by 
 the space to be filled up by the decoration. In Fig. 7 degeneration has 
 not progressed as far as in most of the other figures and the motive is 
 apparent. 
 
 Figs. 8-10 are forms common on pottery vessels, sometimes painted, 
 but oftener incised or in relief. 
 
 Fig. 11 shows the designs on a tapestry belt. It is very common on 
 the small bags that may have been used as charms. This fish head varies 
 but slightly from that shown in Plate I, Fig. 4, and the means shown 
 there of identification apply equally to this form and its many variants. 
 
 Fig. 12 has been identified as the horse mackerel and is a fairly 
 realistic representation of that fish. It is painted in several colors on a 
 pottery vessel from Nazca. 
 
 Fig. 13 is cut from a thin sheet of silver. Twenty of these fish are 
 fastened on a cord in the form of a necklace. It comes from Ica, but 
 such fish strung together or with beads were common in many places in 
 the coast region. 
 
 The forms shown in Figs. 14-16 represent the shark and are found 
 both on cloth and on pottery vessels. 
 
 Fig. 17 is in relief on a pottery vessel from Surco. It is a very 
 common fish form over all the coast region. The original of this sketch 
 is 9 em. long, and it is often seen very much larger both on cloth and 
 pottery. 
 
 Figs. 18-19 are from Nazca pottery. Each shows a horizontal line 
 of white which in the first case completely separates the body into two 
 unequal parts. Whether this represents the median line or was only a 
 fancy of the artist must be left to guesswork. 
 
 10 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 In Fig. 18 there is an idea for the design student. In the original 
 the two parts are in different colors, with the line of white between them. 
 This will suggest to the design student the breaking up of any of the 
 other figures and using the parts so obtained in his work. 
 
 THE BIRD 
 Puate III 
 
 Figs. 1-8 and 11 are from the coast region in the vicinity of Lima. 
 Figs. 1-2 show the typical bird of Peruvian cloth. The heads and necks 
 are fairly realistic. _The body consists of the form mentioned in the 
 remarks on the interlocked fish design, Plate II, Fig. 1. As was said, 
 this consists of a figure bounded on one side by a straight line, and on the 
 other by a zigzag which forms chevrons or points. The number of points, 
 or length of the body, depends entirely on the space to be decorated. 
 
 Fig. 3. The head is more realistic than in the two preceding figures, 
 but the body is represented in the same way. In the original the space 
 between the head and the body is nearly filled by the head of a second 
 bird, turned in the opposite direction, the two forming an interlocked 
 bird design. 
 
 Fig. 4 is from the border of a tapestry poncho, where the decoration 
 consists of a long line of these birds. Each figure is woven in several 
 colors, and they are so placed that two with the same color scheme do 
 not come together. Note the exaggerated topknot projecting over the 
 bird’s head. This device makes the whole figure nearly rectangular, 
 and in a row of such designs little space will be left undecorated. 
 
 Fig. 5 is painted on white cloth. The heavy outline is black, the 
 body brown, and the eye and space between the mandibles were left 
 white. 
 
 Fig. 6. Here again the artist resorted to the same device as is 
 shown in Fig. 4. He has used an exaggerated topknot to balance his 
 designs and cover space. 
 
 Fig. 7. In this case the wings have been carried over the head and 
 made to serve as quite a part of the design. } 
 
 Fig. 8 shows a common bird form in textiles. It will be seen that 
 this is very closely related to the form in Fig. 2. If we substitute the 
 legs in this for one of the points in the body of that one, we shall have 
 practically the same design. 
 
 11 
 
PLATE III 
 
 a2 
 Bie 
 
 26 T.Ey 
 
 ao, & 
 
 
 
 
 
 FANT ALAS a 
 we ans 
 
 THE BIRD 
 
ith CVA Nes ht 
 
 Fig. 9 represents a humming bird. <A row of these birds is painted 
 around a pottery vessel from Nazca. They are all sucking honey from 
 ‘a six-pointed flower on the upper surface of the vessel. Only a part of 
 this flower is shown in the sketch. 
 
 Fig. 10 shows another bird on Nazca pottery. This, like the last 
 described, is beautifully painted in colors. 
 
 Fig. 11 is a pelican that has just caught a fish. This design is a part 
 of the woven fabric. Similar figures are also found in relief on cloth. 
 This is done by sewing on narrow pieces of braid. The fish in the bird’s 
 mandibles is a conventionalized form, often seen both on cloth and 
 pottery, especially where space only admits of a small figure. 
 
 Fig. 12 shows birds from three Nazca pottery vessels. They are 
 painted white on variously colored darker backgrounds. 
 
 Fig. 13 shows the decorations on a piece of vicufia cloth, as it is 
 commonly called, from Pachacamac. The warp threads are cotton, 
 crossed by a weft of vicufia wool, which completely covers them. The 
 ground color is a deep reddish-brown with the decoration in yellow. 
 The effect produced is extremely pleasant and artistic and has made 
 this textile one of the favorites of art students who have many times 
 copied it in colors. It also affords a good example of the influence of 
 basket work on the arts of these people. The lines bounded by zigzags 
 are plainly copied from the work of the basket maker. The birds’ necks 
 rise and depend from these basket designs. 
 
 Fig. 14 is from a large shawl-like garment from Lachay, near Chan- 
 cay. The color of this textile is indigo blue with the designs woven in 
 white, in broad stripes. It is the interlocked bird design: the upper 
 bird faces to the right, and the lower one to the left. If we study one 
 of these birds we find in its neck and body the same form as is shown 
 in Fig. 3. 
 
 THE PUMA 
 PLATE IV 
 
 Fig. 1 shows the head of the puma in terra cotta. This form is only 
 found in the art of Tiahuanaco. It seems to be the parent of the hun- 
 dreds of conventionalized cat heads wherever the influence of Tia- 
 huanaco art is found and especially at Pachacamac. The puma was 
 one of the gods worshipped by the Peruvians, and the “‘ puma god,” part 
 man and part puma, is often represented in the arts of the Tiahuanaco 
 or Megalithic people. 
 
 13 
 
PLATE IV 
 
 i) 
 
 So 
 
 
 
 THE PUMA 
 
PHRUVIAN ART 
 
 Fig. 2. The central figure on the monolithic gateway at Tiahuanaco 
 is represented as wearing a belt with this form of puma head on either 
 end of it. A great number of variants of this head are common to Tia- 
 huanaco art and wherever its influence extended. 
 
 Figs. 3-4 are plainly derived from the preceding figure. Fig. 3, from 
 Pachacamac, has the ring nose. Fig. 4, from Nazca, has a step-form 
 nose in place of the ring. There is a close similarity in the outlines of 
 these figures. We shall find other variations on this head in Figs. 7, 
 9, and 15. | 
 
 Figs. 5-6. These two figures will show, to a person who has no 
 knowledge of primitive art, one way in which animal figures degenerate. 
 It would be very excusable if such a person did not recognize Fig. 6 as 
 a great cat. In fact, a positive identification could not be made by 
 anyone who had not seen the same form of the animal before the degen- 
 eration had proceeded to the extent shown here. Now, looking at Fig. 5, 
 we recognize that 1t shows the same animal in a more realistic form. It 
 is still highly conventionalized, but the presence of the humped-up back, 
 a characteristic of the cat family, and the tail, both omitted in Fig. 6, 
 clearly identify it. To identify many highly conventionalized repre- 
 sentations of animals in any primitive art, one must be long associated 
 with large collections, which are seldom to be found except in museums. 
 Only in this way can he become familiar with the peculiar art of a primi- 
 tive people. He sees the animal forms represented with considerable 
 truth to nature, and also a long succession of figures where, as it were, 
 the original form is gradually fading away, until the degeneration has 
 run its full course and left little more than a geometrical figure. 
 
 Figs. 7-8. The Peruvians had a fondness for combining a number 
 of animal heads in a design. Sometimes heads of the same animal, but 
 often of two or more different kinds, were thus combined. Fig. 7 shows 
 two puma heads joined by a curved band. The design is painted on a 
 pottery vessel from Pachacamac. On account’of the form of the band 
 that connects the heads, this figure has sometimes been mistaken for a 
 representation of a serpent, but a comparison of one of the heads with 
 the four puma heads on the line above will show its true character. 
 Fig. 8, on a web from Ancon, has the typical cat heads connected by an 
 angular band. 
 
 Fig. 9 shows part of a human face engraved on a piece of a stone 
 vessel from Tiahuanaco. One eye is represented with the facial decora- 
 
 15 
 
AMERICAN MUSEUM GUIDE LEAFLET 
 
 tion about it. The other eye is similarly decorated. The puma head 
 below the eye plainly belongs to the same animal, as do those in Figs. 
 2 and 3. 
 
 Figs. 10 to 20 are from the coast region, within fifty miles of Lima. 
 
 Figs. 10-11 are very common in tapestry. Both have the raised 
 back, a characteristic of the cat family. 
 
 Fig. 12 is another example of their fondness for joining animal forms 
 together in a design. The two cats have the humped-up back in common. 
 
 Fig. 13 is common on cloth, pottery, gourds, and on metal objects. 
 A comparison of this figure with that in Fig. 6 shows a great similarity 
 in the management of the legs. Doubtless some ancestor of this design 
 has the raised back and tail that we have seen to have been the case 
 with the other figure. : 
 
 Fig. 141s from a piece of tapestry from Ancon. The most noticeable 
 thing about this figure is the manner of representing the nose, eyes, and 
 mouth. The technique of weaving seems to have been responsible for 
 this form, as Hasluck shows the same device in a lion woven in a goat- 
 hair carpet of the fifteenth century from Persia.1 Certainly no one will 
 claim contact between the prehistoric Peruvians and Persians. 
 
 Fig. 15. This design is taken from a coca bag from Pachacamac. 
 It is in the style of Tiahuanaco. 
 
 Fig. 16 is from a long belt or sash. It is the most highly conven- 
 tionalized design on this Plate, but the characteristics of the cat family, 
 the raised back and tail, are still present. 
 
 Fig. 17 is painted on either end of a barrel-shaped vessel from Ica. 
 
 Fig. 18 was taken from a textile from Ancon. The design is made 
 up of cat and bird heads. Their fondness for joining different animals 
 together in a design has been spoken of before. It is not uncommon 
 to find birds, cats, and fish in the same design. 
 
 Fig. 19 is from a gourd bowl from Marquez, near Lima. The design 
 is burned into the side of the vessel. Pyrography was commonly used 
 ‘in decorating these gourds. This design shows three motives, cat, bird, 
 and fish. There has never been any difficulty in recognizing the cat 
 and bird, but in my experience few students see the fish motive in this 
 
 1Decorative Designs of all Ages for all Purposes. London, Paris, New York, 
 Toronto, and Melbourne, 1808, p. 128. 
 
 16 
 
PHRUVIAN ART 
 
 figure until their attention is called to other designs where practically 
 the same form of fish is shown, but under conditions that make its true 
 nature more apparent. See Figs. 1-3 on Plate IT. 
 
 Fig. 20 is found both on cloth and pottery, in the coast region. 
 
 *~MAN AND MYTHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS 
 PLATE V 
 
 Fig. 1 is from tapestry from Surco. 
 
 Fig. 2 was taken from a long cotton belt from Chancay. 
 
 Fig. 3 shows a woven tapestry design from Pachacamac. It is in 
 the Tiahuanaco style and probably represents the puma god. Their 
 fondness for combining different animal figures has been spoken of. 
 Note near the bottom, to the right, the bird head and neck, and to the 
 left of it a puma head with its ring nose. Compare this head with those 
 on Plate IV, Figs. 2, 3, 4, and 9. 
 
 Fig. 4. This conventionalized human figure is common in many 
 parts of Peru. The head occupies the center of the stan and the 
 arms and legs have degenerated into scrolls. 
 
 Figs. 5-6 are painted on Nazca pottery. 
 
 Fig. 7. In this design the man’s headdress, arms, and legs have 
 turned into frets. 
 
 Figs. 8-9 are from painted decorations on Nazca pottery. Fig. 8 
 shows a face very common on vessels from that locality, especially on 
 the tall, cylindrical ones. 
 
 Fig. 10 shows a human head with feather headdress. This form of 
 representing feathers is common all over the coast region. It is painted 
 on a pottery vessel from Pachacamac. 
 
 Fig. 11, also from Pachacamac pottery, needs no comment. 
 
 Fig. 12 is woven ina web from Ancon. It shows a headdress of two 
 feathers and has the ear represented in a curious way that seems to be 
 peculiar to Peruvian art. We find this same ear in animal figures. See 
 the puma head at the lower part of Fig. 3 on this Plate. Dr. Arthur 
 Baessler has commented at some length on this subject, and styles this 
 figure ‘‘a misdrawn ear.’”! 
 
 1Ancient Peruvian Art, Ed. A. H. Keane. Description of Plates 136-139. New 
 York, 1902-1903. 
 
 Mi 
 
PLATE V 
 
 
 
 MAN AND MYTHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS 
 
PERUVIAN ART 
 
 Figs. 13-14 show faces painted on Nazca pottery. 
 
 Figs. 15-17. We have here three mythological characters of the 
 pre-Incan people. They occur in many localities, with such local varia- 
 tions as we should naturally expect them to show. The first is part bird 
 and part man; the second, part fish and part man; and the third, part 
 cat and part man. They are known respectively as the condor god, the 
 fish god, and the puma god. They are taken from painted representa- 
 tions on pottery. Fig. 15 is from Pachacamac. Fig. 16 is common in 
 the coast region, and is often represented as chasing two men in a balsa. 
 Fig. 17 is from Nazca. 
 
 Figs. 18-24 show various designs from the human head and form 
 which I have copied from painted decorations on Nazca pottery. 
 
 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS PERUVIAN DESIGNS 
 
 19 
 
PLATE VI 
 
 1) 
 
 IMUANATI 
 
 Y 
 
 » 6, & S| ae aN 2 
 fhm mim Mn Me MT 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS PERUVIAN DESIGNS 
 
PLATE VII 
 
 FREE RFRFFEFFFE 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS PERUVIAN DESIGNS 
 
 
 
PLATE VIII 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ert 
 _ 
 ee 
 ————J 
 ————— I) = 
 v4 OA 
 
 = 
 
 
 
 
 
 pe 
 iS 
 SS 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 : 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 TR 
 
 ie 
 
 A 
 
 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS PERUVIAN DESIGNS 
 
BIBLIOGRAPHY 
 
 The works named below are profusely illustrated and will be found 
 useful to the student of design. They may be consulted on application 
 to the librarian of the Museum. 
 
 PERU 
 
 BagEssLeR, ARTHUR. Ancient Peruvian Art. Berlin, 1902-1903. 
 Crawrorp, M. D. C. _ Peruvian Textiles. (Anthropological Papers, American 
 Museum of Natural History, Vol. 12, Part 3, 1915.) 
 Peruvian Fabrics. (Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural 
 History, Vol. 12, Part 4, 1916.) 
 Meap, CHartes W. The Six Unit Design in Ancient Peruvian Cloth. (Boas 
 Anniversary Volume, New York, 1906.) 
 The Puma Motive in Ancient Peruvian Art. (Proceedings, International Con- 
 gress of Americanists, 19th Session, Washington, 1917.) 
 Conventionalized Figures in Ancient Peruvian Art. (Anthropological Papers, 
 American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 12, Part 5, 1916.) 
 Reiss, W., and Sttsex, A. The Necropolis of Ancon. Berlin, 1880-1887. 
 Scumipt, Max. Altperuanische Gewebe. Leipzig and Berlin, 1911. 
 STuse., A., Reiss, W., and Kopre., B. Kultur und Industrie Stidamerikanischer 
 Volker. Berlin, 1890. 
 Unie, Max. The Nazca Pottery of Ancient Peru. (Proceedings, Davenport Acad- 
 emy of Sciences, Davenport, 1916.) 
 Pachacamac. Report of the William Pepper, M.D., LL.D., Peruvian Expedi- 
 tion of 1896. (University of Pennsylvania, Department of Archeology, 
 1903.) 
 WIENER, CHARLES. Peru et Bolivie. Paris, 1880. 
 
 SOME OTHER LOCALITIES 
 
 The books in the following list cover a wide range in the arts of 
 - primitive peoples. It contains, however, but a small part of the vol- 
 umes in.the Museum’s library, that will prove of great help to the student. 
 
 AMBROSETTI, JUAN B. Antiqiiedades Calchaquies. Buenos Aires, 1902. 
 Explorations Arquelégicas en la Cuidad Prehistorica de “‘La Paya.” Buenos 
 
 Aires, 1908. 
 
 Batrour, Henry. Evolution et Decorative Art. London, 1898. 
 
 Boas, Franz. Decorative Art of the Indians of the North Pacific Coast. (Bulle- 
 tin, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 9, 1897.) 
 
 Drxon, Routanp B. Basketry Designs of the Indians of Northern California. 
 (Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, Vol 17, 1902.) 
 
 FEWKES, Jesse WauteR. Archeological Expedition to Arizona in 1895. (Seven- 
 teenth Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, 1898.) 
 
 23 
 
Gorpon, GrorGE B. The Serpent Motive in the Ancient Art of Central America 
 and Mexico. (Transactions, Department of Archeology, University of 
 Pennsylvania, Vol. 1, 1904.) 
 
 Happon, A. C. Evolution in Art. London and New York, 1902. 
 
 Decorative Art of British New Guinea. Dublin, 1896. 
 
 Hamiuron, Augustus. Art and Workmanship of the Maori Race in New Zealand. 
 Dunedin, N. Z., 1896. 
 
 Hotes, WittiamM H. Textile Art in its Relation to the Development of Form and 
 Ornament. (Sixth Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology, Wash- 
 ngton, 1888.) 
 
 Pottery of the Ancient Pueblos. (Fourth Annual Report, Bureau of American 
 Ethnology; Washington, 1886.) 
 
 Ancient Art of the Province of Chiriqui. (Sixth Annual Report, Bureau of 
 American Ethnology, Washington, 1888.) 
 
 Hovuacu, Water. Culture of the Ancient Pueblos of the Upper Gila River Region, 
 New Mexico and Arizona. (Bulletin 87, United States National Museum, 
 1914.) 
 
 Kocu-Grtnperc, THEeopor. Zwei Jahre unter den Indianern—Reisen in Nord- 
 west-Brasilien, 1903-1905. Band 1-2. Berlin, 1908. 
 
 .Krorser, A. L. Basket Designs of the Indians of Northwestern California. (Uni- 
 versity of California, Publications in American Archeology and Ethnology, 
 Vol. II, No. 4, Berkeley, 1905.) 
 
 The Arapaho. (Bulletin, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 18, 1902.) 
 Basket Designs of the Mission Indians of California (Anthropological Papers, 
 American Museum of Natural History, vol. 20, pt. 2, 1922). 
 
 Laurer, Berruotp. The Decorative Art of the Amur Tribes. (Memoirs, Ameri- 
 can Museum of Natural History, Vol. 7, 1902.) 
 
 Lumuotrz, Cart. Decorative Art of the Huichol Indians. (Memoirs, American 
 Museum of Natural History, Vol. 3, 1903.) 
 
 Mason, Otis Turron. Indian Basketry. 2 vols. London, 1905. 
 
 Niewenuuis, A. A. Quer Durch Borneo. Leiden, 1907. 
 
 NoRDENSKIOLD, G. The Cliff Dwellers of the Mesa Verde. Chicago, 1892. 
 
 SprnpEN, Herpert J. A Study of Maya Art: Its Subject Matter and Historical 
 Development. (Memoirs, Peabody Museum of American Archeology and 
 Ethnology, Vol. 6, Cambridge, 1913.) 
 
 Sremven, Kart von pen. Unter den Naturvélkern Central-Brasiliens. Berlin, 
 1894. : 
 
 Serer, Epuarp. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Amerikanischen Sprach- und 
 Alterthumskunde. 3 vols. Berlin, 1902-1908. 
 
 Wisstpr, CuarK. Decorative Art of the Sioux Indians. (Bulletin, American 
 Museum of Natural History, Vol. 18, 1902.) 
 
 Some Protective Designs of the Dakota. (Anthropological Papers, American 
 Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1, Part I, 1907.) 
 
 24 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 ban 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 thy 
 
 FOR 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 FoR