AS : ELA ard PPE LLL ELLE PERNA ASR RRA PE A REE gS WSN SWORN GEROM#s JEAN LEON GEROME 1889 (EROME THE LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. BY FANNY FIELD HERING. FROM AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES AND LETTERS BY THE ARTIST HIMSELF, WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY AUGUSTUS ST. GAUDENS. INCLUDING A PORTRAIT OF GEROME, NINETEEN FULL-PAGE PHOTOGRAVURES, AND TWENTY-FIVE FULL-PAGE PHOTO-PROCESS REPRODUCTIONS OF HIS PAINTINGS AND SCULPTURE, TOGETHER WITH FIFTY PENCII-DRAWINGS, MADE ESPECIALLY FOR THIS BOOK BY GEROME, AND EX (CUTED BY BOUS- SOD, VALADON & CO., SUCCESSORS TO GOUPIL. PUBLISHED BY CASSELL. PUBLISHING COMPANY ONE HUNDRED AND. FOUR AND ONE HUNDRED AND Six FOURTH AVENUE NEW YORK his reserved, THE MERSHO AHWAY MPANY PRESS, INTRODUCTION, HE pleasure of associating my name with that of Géréme led me to accept impulsively the flattering proposal that I should contribute to this work some expression of my feeling toward him. Now that I think seriously of what I have undertaken, the first thing that occurs to me is hat the author should be thanked for her earnestness and spirit in making the production of this work possible and in inducing Géréme to give us now his own history of a life so filled with artistic interest. There is in his art, apart from its elevation and virility of style, that which tanks him in my mind with the Greek artists. So much so, that I feel he would have taken his place in the everyday life of Athens; I involuntarily imagine him in all the joyous contrasts of the blue skies and superb architecture, sharing the rilliancy and nervousness of Athenian life when the Parthenon was built. It seems to me that this feeling represents the unexpressed thought of many of his admirers. Since an early winter of our Civil War, when, as a boy, I stopped evening after evening at Goupil’s window on Broadway and adored Gérome’s Death of Cesar, my admiration for him has never wavered, and to be called upon, after nearly thirty years, to give expression to my feeling under these conditions, and to add one more wreath to his laurels, is an enviable opportunity. AUGUSTUS ST. GAUDENS. iti PREECE: AM asked to write a preface for a book which treats only of me and my works, and to present it to the public. I feel peculiarly embarrassed, the more so that I am ignorant of the art of writing; but as I wish, above all things, to please the author, I yield. However, I question whether a preface is really necessary ; ordinarily one does not read it, and I think a good work can very well dispense with it. Thus, then, dear reader, if you will take my advice, turn these first pages and go directly to the book. This volume is written in English, and I am unacquainted with this lan- guage,—consequently I can express no opinion about it,—but I have my fears that the friendship which unites me to the writer has placed a bandage over her eyes, and that the estimate herein found is too eulogistic and far above my poor merits. [ wish only to give my general impressions about contemporaneous art, after having cast a glance at preceding epochs. Everything is connected and bound together in the arts as elsewhere, and one is always the son of somebody. The Vanloos, Simon Vouet, Jouvenet, etc., had passed away; David had come. He created a new school, that is to say, another manner of seeing and feeling. This painter of great talent and of great will had considerable influence upon the artists of his time. He wished to lead back art to the antique, long since abandoned, but, unhappily, he drew his inspiration from the works of the Greek decadence instead of going back to Phidias and his predecessors. The Apollo Belvedere, and Diana, the Huntress, necessarily led him to the Rafe of the Sabines, and Leonidas at Thermopyle, works which are cold, without character, without movement, and without life. On the contrary, when he gave expression to his individuality, he painted portraits of the first order, and a picture, 7%e Coronation of Napoleon, which is a work of great beauty, and does honor to the French School. After him, M. Ingres, after a profound observation of antiquity, revived more healthy and exalted ideas. He was the undisputed chief of that Classic School which, during long years, contended with the Romantic School, whose most illustrious representative was Eugéne Delacroix. This struggle took place not only in the plastic arts, but also in literature, Victor Hugo being there the high- priest. By the side of these two opposing forces another power made its way; this band of artists and men of letters received the title of the School of Good vi PREFACE, The contest was hot and the harshest criticisms were not stinted on either side: Sense. Paul Delaroche and Casimir Delavigne belonged to this party. each violently attacking the other, which in turn did not spare the opposing party. A blow for a blow, an eye for an eye, was the device of the com- batants. This epoch was disturbed, but gave evidence of an extraordinary vitality, and extremely powerful works in every genre were the result of these epic conflicts. In these times, one believed; one possessed the sacred fire. Art was a religion and artists had faith ; faith, that enormous power that can move mountains. This pleiad of men of merit shed a dazzling light, and this epoch need en no other, for science, literature, music, all the arts had as representatives men of eminent talent, who shone with incomparable brillian It would perhaps be useful to review the long list of these different celebrities, and the catalogue would be very curious and interesting. The nineteenth cen- ury is and will remain one of the great epochs of the world ; it has made a giant stride in advance, and for a period of fifty years the achievements easy to be enumerated have been stupendous ; for it is in our day, to cite only the principal discoveries, that photography, chloroform, electricity, the telephone, etc., have been utilized and that we have employed steam to annihilate distance. Steam is he connecting link between nations. We behold only the début of these things; ut the way is open, it is fertile, and we ask ourselves where human genius will pause and what our sons will see. This little digression concluded, let us return to the plastic arts. Toward the year 1848, the power of expression which it has and this no doubt was owing tot austere and profound studies t French School, taken as a whole, had not that since acquired; in the main it was rather weak, ne primary studies having been neglected; it is hat make great painters and great sculptors ; one lives all one’s life on this foundation, and if it is lacking one will only be mediocre. Just as a good breeder feeds his colts with oats in order to make of them strong, sturdy horses in the future, so young artists should be nourished with the marrow of lions, and led to the purest springs to quench their thirst. From this somber mass, com posed of artists who possessed only a secondary merit, several brilliant personalities stood out in relief, luminous meteors, who caused the other artists who revolved in their orbit to appear still more dull. Since then the Ecole has perceptibly improved, has strengthened in its manner of a more powerful, more homogeneous seeing, feeling, and reproducing ; it forms whole, a more imposing exsemb/e. Unfortunately, the number of painters, and consequently of worthless ones, has increased beyond all measure; it is because painting is now a matter of commerce; formerly the profession did not secure a PREFACE, vii man his bare living—to-day it has become a paying thing ; it is only the sculptors, nowadays, who die of hunger. But this is owing to complex causes and it is to be feared that these reasons will always exist. For some years the sentiment which governs art productions has been com- pletely changing, and the works of men who in their time had many admirers, are, for the moment, entirely unfashionable and despised. I think that this is very unjust to these artists, formerly great, and that they are not treated with the respect due to them, but it has been thus since naturalism was invented. Now, there may be good in naturalism (and Iam of those who observe with interest all these diverse manifestations, because, on the whole, movement is life); nevertheless, I avow, it seems to me we area little too near the earth; and, for example, one can see in an exhibition of two thousand pictures many canvases well painted and of a truthful and striking appearance, but in this total you may deem yourself fortunate if you run across two or three works which appeal to your heart and your soul. They have abandoned themselves to realism, to common- oylace and indiscriminating realism ; the letter has killed the spirit, and poetry has fled to the heavens. Formerly, French artists had undisputed precedence over foreigners, when they executed pictures where research from the plastic side, and the portrayal of simply comprehended and clearly, powerfully expressed, constituted the basis of the work; now they are devoted to the picturesque, which is more convenient and easy. The last Exposition demonstrated that in other countries beside our own there are excellent artists in this style. From the picturesque we have advanced to the strange, from the strange to the bizarre, from the bizarre to the fantastic ; one would say that a gust of mad- ness was sweeping over our heads ; where are we going to stop? But these mannerisms will not long be able to usurp a place in the Ecole, and I am not unduly anxious; for that which distinguishes us, the foundation of the French character, is perspicacity and good sense. A fics LIST OF PHOTOGRAVURES. EAN Lion GirOmE, 1889, . 3 D é 3 é é = 3 : : TITLE Tue Curistran Marryrs; or, THE Lasr Prayer, 1860 To 1883, : : E 8 Gotcorna ; “Ir 1s FinisHep,” 1868, . A ; : ‘i Fe ‘ 5 P F 24 GEpieus; Bonaparte BeEFoRE THE SPHINX, 1886, . : 2 z 5 P : 36 Tre Graprators (ScutprureE—Bronze), 1878, . 4 i , - E . 48 Tue Muezzin (Ar Nicur), 1882, . : ; : : ‘ : : 6 : 56 Tue Pyrruic Dancer, 1883, ; 7 2 : 3 A 2 e z ove Qua ns Quem Devoret, 1889, . é 3 : B e F c ° 5 88 Granp Baru ar Broussa, 1885, é j 6 3 & . ‘ : : - 104 SPRINGTIME (ARABIA), 1890, . , : : 2 2 5 5 : $ é 116 Tue Carpet Mercuant, 1887, . : 3 a F é 3 8 : i es Tuer TERRACE OF THE SERAGLIO, 1886, . - 3 : ; 5 é : 3 136 Tue Roser, 1889, : : : : : é ‘ ; : : z a xe) Tue Enpd oF THE SEANCE, 1887, . : 5 a : 5 ¢ . : 168 Love, THE CONQUEROR, 1889, 5 . : 3 : 5 5 ‘ : LS: Tue Marazout, 1889, . Fs 4 " é é E F 6 6 ; : 200 BarusuEsa, 1889, : : : : 5 ° : é 3 0 ° » 22 Gate or BaB-EL-ZOUEL, 1886, 5 é 5 5 . 5 : : 224 Tue Ports Dream, 1886, . 6 ; " : c 5 : é : . 240 Tanacra, 1890, : : : : 5 ; a : ‘ : ; : : 264 Eis OF 2HOTO-ETCHINGS. FACING PAGE Tue Duet AFTER THE Batt, 5 : : : i 5 E A 5 4 Ave Cassar, . 3 2 3 ; F 5 : : : . s . , 16 Puryne Brerore THE AREOPAGUS, a é ; * : : : 4 a eR: Tue Two Aucur HE ALMEE, Tue PrisoneR ON THE NILE, ‘ 5 a : . 3 5 a a é 68 CLEOPATRA AND Cz Tue D PHE SLAVE-MARKET, : < ‘ f . 5 9 i : 5 . 108 Tue Granp Wuitre Eunucu, 2 : : é ? . é 5 i 120 For SALE, . 5 : i : 5 5 3 5 5 : : 6 3 ake L’EMINENCE GRISE, : : : : : : 4 3 5 : 5 : 144 EX TIBICEN, B Z . F : 3 : : 4 : A : : a SG A COLLABORATION, . : 3 é P 5 3 : 3 . 3 P 172 PoLLICE VERSO, . , : A ‘ 4 3 c ’ f : : ‘ 5 Beste) Tue ReTuRN FROM THE CHASE, ef ‘ : A : i 5 5 > . 192 [HE ARAB AND HIS STEE ANACREON (SCULPTURE), . j G 3 5 5 3 5 e : é : 216 Tue Circus Maximus, Louis XIV. anp tHE Great Conpk, 236 Necro Kerper or Hounps, 3 2 : : 5 : A g 2 - 244 Tue Harem IN THE Kiosk, . : ; 5 : : 3 é é 3 5 252 Tue SERPENT-CHARMER, x a i F : : : 5 e : : . 260 Tue Tur Fo.ty, A : 5: 4 : 5 ; 5 : = 268 fue Two Kuves, : : : : 3 é E : 5 2 5 é eee IN ADDITION, ARE Firry SKETCHES DRAWN BY GEROME ESPEC- IALLY FOR THIS WORK, INTERSPERSED THROUGHOUT THE TEXT. LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME Whoever would fully understand the work of Géréme, unequaled, since the days of Leonardo da Vinci, in its marvelous comprehensiveness, must know him not only as painter, sculptor, poet, savant, and teacher—but as a man. When that king of critics, Théophile Gautier, announced the début of the youth of twenty-three in the memorable words, ‘‘ Let us mark with white this happy year, for a painter is born to us! He is called Géréme. To-day I tell you his name, and I predict that to-morrow he will be celebrated !”—even he, with his acute perception and prophetic eye, could not have foreseen and measured the heights to be attained by the boyish “chief of the néo-grecs,’’ or that, forty years later, almost overburdened with decorations, titles, and laurels, lavished upon him by all civilized nations, he would be acclaimed the most eminent represent- ative of high art of this nineteenth century. Nor does Gérome’s experience confirm the ancient adage, too often true, that ‘‘a prophet is not without honor save in his own country.” For he has received from the French nation the highest tributes at her command, by the hands of king, emperor, and president of the Republic, successively interpreting the will of an appreciative and grateful people. Men illustrious in poetry, science, and belles-lettres proudly claim him as comrade and con/rére, he counts only friendly rivals among his brother artists, and the most captious of professional critics are hushed to an admiring silence before the symmetrical beauty and power of his achievements, while for thirty years an ever-increasing throng of ardent stu- dents, from all climes and countries,—notably our own,—have pressed around him, eager to follow in the path which he has trod and in which he still leads them, steadily striving after more perfect realization and expression of truth and eauty. A thorough study of the life and works of this art who justly bears the title of Master, in its fullest sense, leaves one penetrated with wonder, admiration, and loving reverence. At an age when another would think of little save well- is) LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. earned repose and tranquil enjoyment of a world-wide fame, behold this veteran of sixty-seven, with surpassing vigor and delicacy of conception and execution, still giving to the world masterpieces, in both painting and sculpture, any one of which would confer immortality on its creator. The most esteemed authorities who can legitimately claim to form and direct public opinion have again and éme’s art. again borne witness to the remarkable breadth and dignity of Gé From them we shall gain a fuller appreciation of his attainments, a deeper insight into his aims. The Master's own words, too,—while betraying the unaffected modesty characteristic of truly great natures,—will reveal to us a nobility of conception, an energy of achievement, a loftiness of aspiration, and a passion for the truth, as genuine as they are rare. Add to these transcendent qualities the profundity of a scientist, the imagination of a poet, a perception trained by years of travel and research, and a skill that triumphs over all difficulties of technique fuse and blend the whole by the white heat of that gift of the gods, the un- quenchable fire of genius, and we have Gérome, the artist, fitly described by an eminent writer in the London 4A¢henwum as ‘‘the august leader of the French school, in whose hands, more than in those of any one else, rest the noblest traditions of a great and learned school.” Before entering upon a careful consideration of Gérome’s vast achievements in all their captivating detail, it is desirable to take a rapid survey of his work as a whole, especially comparing the opinions of the most illustrious critics among his own countrymen, whose broad and scholarly training inclines them to be exacting to the verge of severity, and whose judgment is therefore of inestimable value and weight to those who desire to study these fascinating creations in their many-sided but harmonious entirety. His productions naturally group themselves into several distinct classes, which draw their inspiration from the Antigue, the Orient, Modern History, and the realm of Fantasy—the latter finding its themes anywhere in the wide region that lies between ancient mythology and our ultra civilization. Among the pictures in the first group which display the highest artistic qualities, combined with the science of the savant and the historian, we may number the Combat de Cogs, Anacréon, A Greek Interior, Bacchus and Love, Age of Augustus, Ave Cesar, Imperator / King Candaules, two presentations of the Death of Cesar, Phryné before the Aréopagus, The Two Augurs, Socrates seeking Alcibiades at the house of Aspasia, The Comedians, Cléopatra and Cesar, Pollice Verso, The Circus Maximus, and The Last Prayer, otherwise known as 7he Christian Martyrs. We may not dwell here on the varied beauties of these masterpieces, in which we find poetic ideality and historical accuracy, classic simplicity and wealth of decoration, dramatic intensity and reli: resignation, humor, pathos, satire, LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 8 philosophy, action, repose, the joy of life, the majesty of death! And all crystallized in a beauty of form that can only be modeled by the hand of the greatest master of draughtsmanship in the world. It seems almost inconceivable, yet there have been critics of limited per- ceptions and faulty education who have ventured to reproach Gérome for the archeological erudition displayed in many of his pictures! I fancy that most of us will agree with Gautier, who pronounces it ‘‘one of the most interesting provinces of painting, while always remaining within the conditions of art, to resurrect a vanished civilization and evoke the image of things forever gone from sight.” It is to be regretted that there exists no reproduction of one of the most important examples of Géréme’s power in this direction, namely: The Age of Augustus, an imposing canvas nearly thirty feet square which adorns the walls of the National Museum at Amiens. The condition of art in France, at the time this picture was painted, has been well described by Alfred de Tanouarn, a thoughtful observer and able writer. “One is astonished [he sa ys], and with just cause, that our faders of history have remained so far below the level of our Aisforians. Historical painting, g, far from reflecting the splendors of written history, becomes more and more obscure. How explain so sad an inconsistency ? ‘In the first place, we must lay the blame for sucha state of things on the slight education of the greater number of our artists. Their only care being to become acquainted with the material secrets of their art, they forget to prepare themselves with a stock of ideas. They are mill-stones which have no wheat to grind, and which turn in a vacuum—a very fatiguing exercise for those who perform it and for the spectator. Assuredly, to represent an animal, a tree, a flower, there is need of correct judgment, a poetic spirit, and a skillful pencil; but to attack historic genre, entirely different arms are necessary. Above all, beware of thinking that it will suffice to have vague, incoherent, and badly digested ideas, which you have received at the moment of commencing your canvas. He who would take his first lesson in fencing an hour before presenting himself for the encounter, would run no trifling risk! It pleases you to execute a scene in Roman history ; will you hastily read some translation of a passage in Titus Livius or Tacitus? You will thus only obtain a work without. character and without depth. You should have lived long years in close intimacy with your personages. One succeeds more e C sily with the portrait of a man whom one sees every day; one can only represent, in their striking reality, the nations and heroes with whom one has become familiar through study and reflection. Here science is not the enemy of inspiration, since, on the contrary, inspiration cannot spring forth where there is no science. In a word, if, in order to paint religious pictures, one must ée/ieve—to be a historical painter, one must vow. And so much the more to-day, since the progress of history has rendered us more exacting toward 4 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. painters, and when we are inclined to demand much of them, they are able to give us but little. “Tf the artist pos ss sufficient instruction, another obstacle presents itself to him. History, it is true, has in our day been treated in a superior manner ; but there exists no moral bond, no common thought, among our historians. Each one of them interprets events a little after his own fanc The painters of history do not work differently. They scarcely follow anything but their individual caprice, and often they stray away, without perceiving it themselves, from historic genre and fall into pure fantasy. “Finally, romance occupies a no less important place than history in the present literature. It has lately touched upon questions that seem the most foreign to it; it aspires to everything. It has been in turn religious, philosophical, and social; lugubrious, fantastic, and humorous; maritime and rural, sentimen- tal and satirical, aristocratic, bourgeois, popular. It has traveled through all epochs of history and to all the corners of the earth. It has penetrated all the mysteries of the heart and all the recesses of society. In a word, the romance has become the favorite distraction of well-to-do people, and the intellectual pasture of the lower classes. Now, it is the painting of genre which, in the domain of art, corresponds to the romance in that of literature. It addresses itself to the same tastes, to the same appetites. The painters of genre have then multiplied among us in proportion to the novelists. They have increased rapidly; they have invaded every domain, excusing themselves for thus lowering the level of art by the necessity of pleasing the crowd. This excuse is not valid, save for feebly endowed minds. ““The artist who has the consciousness of his strength does not consult, with servile anxiety, the inclinations of the multitude; he interrogates himself. He should not /od/ow the public, but Zead it. It is for him to command, not to obey. ““Gérome merits then, more than any one, serious consideration and thought- ful attention, since he has endeavored to fertilize a field become sterile by dint »f having been cultivated. “Devout worshiper of Ja grande feinture, he is worthy to enter into the temple and to serve the divinity. It is then with pleasure that we devote to him this study, in which our aim is to consider him, above all, as a painter of history, although he has shown his powers in almost every genre. “The young artist acquired at Rome that taste for Latin antiquity which he has alw s preserved, since the most important pictures executed by him up to the present moment (1860) are borrowed from the Romans. Far be it from me to complain of this; I am not of those who say : Who will deliver us from the Greeks and the Romans?’ In the first place, the imagination will never free itself from the remembrance of these two nations whose destinies have been so glorious. Besides, they offer to the painter. , as guides and supports, literary geniuses of the first order; and it is no despicable advantage to be able to draw one’s inspirations and images from writers such as Herodotus or Thucydides, Titus Livius or Tacitus. One must not however adopt one nation to the exclusion of all others. The artist is a traveler, who should ‘TIVE AHL WALAV Tand aHL LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 7 roam through history as through a vast domain, and not choose any country where he will elect to remain forever; he should go everywhere and live nowhere. A journey through Egypt is the complement of every voyage having for its aim a profound knowledge of antiquity. It is in Egypt that the civilization of the pagan world commenced; but it vegetated there, slowly and silently ; it only manifested itself in its expansive energy among the Greeks and the Romans; Greece explains itself by Egypt, and Rome by Greece.” This able dissertation was evoked by the exhibition, at the Salon of 1 of the Age of Augustus, in which the artist has grouped around the throne of the deified emperor types of all nations and epochs, displaying in striking measure the knowledge and skill which drew from the distinguished Charles Blanc, one of the immortals of the French Academy, and former director of the Beaux- Arts, the opinion that ‘‘Géréme, among other merits, has not his equal in the art of particularizing races, and of transforming into powerful types the most profoundly individual physiognomies.” He further characterizes this canvas as “‘a vast and noble work.” In the introduction to the ‘‘ History of the Works of Théophile Gautier,”—a valuable and eloquent treatise by the Vicomte de Spoelberch de Lovenjoul,—we find well-merited tribute : the following 8 Let us acknowledge, without fear of exag- geration, Théophile Gautier is, in our estimation, the most perfect French stylist of his age and perhaps of all time. No one has known better than he how to s precisely what he wished to say, and his pen reproduces the most intangible nuance, the most fugitive impression, with an absolute perfection.” In the absence, then, of any pictorial reproduction of the 4ge of Augustus, it is doubly a matter for congratulation that Gautier was so impressed by the lofty ambition and extraordinary learning shown in this composition, that he devoted to it ten pages of an inimitable critique,—itself a picture glowing with color,— which we give in full, regretting profoundly, in this case as in all other citations in this volume, the loss of the more exquisite shades of phrasing inseparable from every translation, however conscientious and sympathetic. When we remember also that Géréme spent more than two years of arduous labor on this canvas, and finished it before he was thirty-one years old, we may easily comprehend the astonished admiration of these older minds before the profound acquirements of a comparative youth. It was of the section devoted to the Fine Arts at the Universal Exposition of 5, that Gautier wrote: “Most of the masters at this great Exposition have done nothing save to place again before eyes which had not forgotten them, the most perfect canvases among their glorious works. One would say that, having arrived C-) LIFE AND WORKS OF JE. ROME. at the middle of this century in which they were born, they wish, on this supreme occasion, to force the world to recognize their title to nobility and their right to be inscribed in the “wre d'or of painting; but very few of these magnificent pictures are contemporary with the present era. M. Géréme, who is young, through honorable modesty, has not thought fit to draw upon his recent masterly produc- tions, which we should have seen again with pleasure: the Combat de Cogs, L’Intérieur Grec, Bacchus et TAmour, Le Temple de Pestum, L'ldvlle, etc. Everything that he exhibits appears for the first time. He, like many others, might have be 2, contented himself with an assured a fA success in remaining within the | A limits of a pure, fine, and graceful { talent; but, seized with a nobler ambition, he has risked an im- mense composition on a gigantic canvas. “His Age of Augustus is a ffort, which we trust will valiant e find more imitators; such noble daring is too rare—youth, nowa- } days, is too prudent; M. Gérome i deserves this praise, that he is Ss eking, with all his might, beauty, nobility, and style; in fact, all the qualities of serious art, and that he often attains them. He has made a genuine historical picture, in the lofty sense in which this word was formerly understood, and he merits the chief place in the new generation. A page of Bossuet has inspired the artist with the idea of his composition. We shall quote it, at the risk of giving to our prose the doubtful luster which the neighborhood of pure gold imparts to copper: “*The remnant of the republic perishes with Brutus and Cassius ; Antony and Cesar, after having ruined Lepidus, turn one upon the other; the entire Roman power is found upon the sea; Caesar gains the battle of Actium; the forces of Egypt and the Orient, led by Antony, are scattered ; all his friends abandon him, even his Cleopatra, for whom he sacrificed himself... . . Everything gives way before the fortune of Cassar; Alexandria opens to him her gates, Egypt becomes a Roman province; Cleopatra, who despairs of being able to retain it, kills herself, after Antony ; Rome holds out her arms to Cesar, who, bearing the name of Augustus and title of Emperor, reigns sole master of the entire empire; he conquers, in the neighborhood of the Pyrenees, the Cantabrians and the rebellious THE CHRISTIAN WEAERTY Rs OR AMELID) JOVNSID Tei VARNA IRIN 1860 TO 1883 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 9 Asturians; Ethiopia sues for peace; the Parthians, terrified, send back to him the standards taken from Crassus, together with all the Roman prisoners ; India seeks his alliance; the power of his arms is felt by the Rheetians, whom their mountains could not defend. Pannonia recognizes him, Germany fears him, and the Weser submits to his laws. Victorious on land and sea, he closes the Temple of Janus. The whole universe lives in peace under his rule, and Jesus Christ is born into the world.’ “The canvas of Géréme is not unworthy this sublime page and can serve as an illustration for it. We shall try to describe, as well as words will permit, the appearance of this vast composition, which embraces an entire century and a whole world in a synthetic form. Against a sky of placid azure, untroubled by a single cloud, is outlined the Temple of Janus, with its pediment surmounted by the gwadriga—closed for the third time since the foundation of Rome; in the background can be seen, in the haze of the distance, the ramparts and towers of the Eternal City. The soft and luminous serenity of an apotheosis floods the upper portion of the canvas, giving an idea of peace, repose, and happiness Before the Temple, Augustus, deified, is seated upon a throne of gold, supported by a pedestal of granite, on which this inscription is engraved in lapidary style and lettering: ‘Cwsar Augustus, tmperator, victor Cantabrorum, Asturum, Par- thorum, Rhetorum et Indorum, Germanie, Pannoniegue domitor, pacificator orbis, pater patric.” “Cesar Augustus has the nude torse of the great gods of Olympus ; a white drapery covers his thighs and knees; the victors crown encircles his brow ; a scepter is in his left hand, while with the right he leans on the shoulder of a figure of Rome, personified by a beautiful helmeted woman, clad in a short red chlamys, a shield on her arm, and holding reversed the point of a useless lance twined with laurels, a symbol of peace acquired by victory. ‘Near the emperor one perceives the statuette of Jupiter Capitolinus and the eagle drawing near to the master with an air at once caressing and respectful. “The countenance of Augustus—calm, majestic, radiant—is of a noble character; like the immortals who know eve and his lips are closed in an immutable half-smile. A human Jupiter, he needs but to knit his brows to win the world ; his body, whose smooth contours give no rything, his eyes regard nothing, prominence to the muscles, betrays a virile but thoroughly intellectual power, which has nothing of the sturdiness of the athlete; the defects of nature have disappeared ; the flesh has become marble, and the man, God. In the midst of this immense composition, Augustus, immovable and pale, has the appearance of a statue worshiped by a prostrate universe. The figure of Rome is no less happy. She alone dares to lean against the throne in a pose of familiar and superb grace. She is at home in this glory, and the splendors of the apotheos illuminate without dazzling her. She regards Augustus as does a wife her beloved husband; Rome and the emperor, do they not form, indeed, a divine couple? Her figure, noble, pure, and firm, attests an eternal youth and justifies the meaning of her mysterious name. 10 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, “At the right angle of the pedestal stands young Tiberius in a white toga and frason mantle. Beneath the juvenile charm of his features profound and | sinister thoughts reveal themselves, and one divines a precocious satiety presaging | the monstrous debauches of Capree. “ Behind Tiberius are massed, in attitudes of respect and admiration, the men of state, senators and consuls, among whom one recognizes Agrippa, the founder vis he world, whose premature death inspired the singer of the A®neid with such of the Pantheon ; Meecenas, whose ancestors were kings; Marcellus, that hope of | eloquent verses. To this group corresponds that of the poets, the Zi#/erateurs, and the artists - 1e gentle and melancholy Virgil, pre a sing to his bosom—as if to indicate that beautiful thoughts come from the heart—the chef-d’wuvre which he desired n 10uld be burned after his death ; Horace, so lyrical, so witty, and so wise in his feigned intoxication ; Propertius, Tibullus, Livius, Vitruvius- a sculptor with his hisel, an actor with his mask ; everything that makes up a great age, such as the | age of Pericles or Augustus ; the age of Leon X. or of Louis XIV. @ “On the marble steps of the monumental staircase which leads from the square in front of the temple to the second plane of the picture, is stretched out | the body of Julius Ceasar, assassinated; Brutus and Cassius, the Orestes and Pylades of this political murder, have already descended several steps, and are | starting for Philippi, where the die is cast which seals the fate of the Republic. Brutus still grasps his poniard, and seems troubled by the tender reproach ‘7 } quogue, mi fili/’ Cassius, his hand shading his eyes, seeks to pierce the veil of the future. “Cleopatra writhes on the body of Antony, charming even in her agony, and | meriting, by the undulating curves of her beautiful figure, the title of the “Serpent of the Ni encircling her pure Greek head causes her to be instantly recognized beside the >,’ given to her by Shakespeare. The Egyptian pshent | herculean body of her lover. Each enemy forms a step of the throne of Augustus. | “At the foot of the staircase throngs a kneeling, prostrate crowd, which kisses | the steps touched by the buskins of the emperor, throws flowers, and waves palms ; from the furthermost ends of the then known world the nations hasten to ma ke act of submission. Here are Indians from the banks of the Ganges, crouched in poses of idols upon an elephant, a heavy massive animal with a ladder on his flank by way of a stirrup. Their bronzed skin, their odd weapons, their mon- | strous fetiches, mounted on the ends of long lance-staves, like standards, recall the [| battles of Darius and Alexander. Vanquished by the Macedonians, they are now | subdued by the Romans, as later on they will be by the English. | ‘Behind the Indians comes a sére, representing the extreme Orient ; by his HT shaved head, and fantastically flowered robe, it is not difficult to tecognize the | ancestor of the Chinese ; he brings, in tribute, a coffer filled with silk tissues. A Parthian restores the eagles taken from Crassus—Rome could never have been | defeated! A woman from Central A a, in almost savage costume, pushes before her two children, infantile Roman citizens; a Greek, with casque, cuiras s, and LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. II énémides, acclaims the divine Augustus ; a Gaul, clad in the skin of a wild beast,— whose open jaws form a crest above his head,—makes his way joyously toward the throne. ‘“We mention only the principal figures, for the crowd is great, and no gaps are visible on the well-filled canvas. “On the other side, to counterbalance the elephant and his burden of Indians, advances a file of dromedaries, with Arabs perched up aloft, draped in their white burnous and carrying, as weapons, bows and bucklers; Egyptians, with their sphinx-like countenances ; Numidians, preserved till now from the yoke by the nearness of the desert, but whom the power of Augustus has reached even in the midst of their sandy wastes; an aged sovereign of some fantastic kingdom of Transoxiana, or Chaldea, approaches sullenly, supported, as if on two living crutches, by two demi-nude slaves—the one yellow, the other black. He wears strange weapons : a scepter decorated with plumes, a robe of brocade, a crown with golden points. And with his silvery beard flowing in great waves, and his air of river-god or magian, half-idol, half-monarch, he seems some fabulous apparition from unknown regions. Lictors and soldiers of irresistible muscularity drag along by the hair captives of both sexes—personification of the rebellious prov- inces obliged to submit to superior fore “Apart from all this movement stands a personage with a reddish beard, clothed in miserable rags, which make a blot on all this luxury ; he must bea Jew, —perhaps the father of Ahasuerus. A purse of leather and an inkhorn hang at his side; his only weapon is a walking-stick, and he regards vaguely this proces- sion of natives who despise him and whom he is to survive ! et us return now to the center of the composition, forced as we are to neglect a thousand ingenious and characteristic details ; but a picture is read at a single glance—the lines are spelled out one by one. ‘* Before an altar where the acolytes have just sacrificed a bull, over the gray embers and charred bones of the holocaust and the withered leaves of crowns and garlands, shines a luminous group, sheltered by the wings of an angel. The little child has just been born ; he wails while Czesar triumphs, his only courtiers the ox and the ass! “he confused presentiments of Virgil are accomplished. As he has said in his prophetic verses, a new order of ages is beginning : “Ultima Cumei venit jam carminis ztas ; Magnus ab integro szclorum nascitur ordo; Jam redit, et Vir: Jam nova progenies ccelo dimittitur alto. 70, redeunt Saturnia regna ; “Tn order to emphasize more forcibly the contrast between the pagan and the Christian world, between the world of matter and that of mind, the painter has borrowed from the Gothic art his naive grace, his modestly restrained poses, his infantine timidity, for his figures of the Holy Virgin, of St. Joseph, and the child Jesus. He has introduced into his grand antique bas-relief an engraving on wood of Albert Diirer. 12 LIF N GEROME. AND WORKS OF JEAN LE “The upper zone of the painting where the apotheosis is taking place has the serene immovability, the harmonious rhythm, the balance of line of a fronton of white marble, sculptured in the facade of a temple ; the lower zone presents a strange swarm and tumult of people and costumes, in which there is more liberty of caprice. “M. Gérome excels in ethnographic paintings, as he has proved by a frieze for the vase commemorative of the Exposition ; no one seizes more perfectly than he the distinctive characteristics of a race, or renders them with a surer touch. Here he had to represent nations, the greater part of which had disappeared without leaving any traces, or lived only on some medals or fragments of sculp- ture ; and when archaical science failed him, he has had recourse to his ingenious imagination, and invented savage Rhetians, Parthians, Hindoos, and Germans of the most likely barbarity. This part of the picture assembles the most curious details of arms, jewels, costumes, coiffures, and physiognomies; nothing is ult of infinite commonplace nor made at a venture. Everything is the 1 thought and research. “In beholding this beautiful canvas, where Augustus, deified and radiant, is isolated on a throne of gold at the top of a white staircase, whose first steps are bathed by waves of barbarians,—having near him only a young warrior unarmed, —the idea occurred to us that the god had too great a number of worshipers ; that their hordes were moving forward, massing themselves, and becoming more and ve and sav more ageres ge, and that soon they would submerge this luminous platform where, in the golden and blue atmosphere, smile Peace, Poetry, and Art. “We do not know gs f M. Géréme had this idea, but it springs up naturally at the sight of these tranquil groups, beneath which foams and surges the rising tide of barbarity, checked only for a moment. Rome wil always be ‘the city,’ par excellence, but St. Peter will replace Czesar, and the Roman Empire will disappear. “The composition of the 4ge of Augustus is of high philosophical import ; it satisfies the mind and arranges itself happily upon the canvas; the drawing of the nude figures and the draperies displays style, knowledge, and strength ; unfortunately the color is a little thin for so large a canvas, which needs to be more empatée—better nourished, so to speak. The artist has wished to remain sober and pure; and in an atelier, doubtless too small, he has probably not sufficiently taken into consideration the demands of perspective in a picture of these dimensions.” After a minute and critical survey of this memorable Salon, Gautier again returns to Gérome’s noble work and, with increased admiration, declares it to be no ‘‘mediocre glory for a young artist thus to achieve a place among the acknow- ledged masters, who are supported by a past filled by renowned creations”; and adds, “‘The Age of Augustus will rank as one of the great canvases of the Exposition.” This superb eulogy from such a source deepens our regret that this master- piece has never been photographed or otherwise reproduced for the benefit of art LIFE AND WORKS OF /. N LEON GEROME, te) collections and students. In this, as in all Gérome’s pictures representing not only absolute historical facts but the social conditions and customs of bygone ages, as well as in the great mass of those taken from Oriental life, this artist reveals his extraordinary pre-eminence as a fi recognized the fact that an abso rure painter. At an early age he ute mastery of the contour and anatomy of the human body is essential to the expression of the noblest forms of art. Working in the atelier of Delaroche, where Greek antiquity received the most profound consideration, and almost exc absorbed the attention of the students, the young artist, with eye and mi 8 usively nd ever on the alert to discover and sup his weak points, realized that was the great fountain-head of and beauty, and applied himse rigorous conscientiousness to the more difficult study of living models. covered for himself the truth repeatedly and forcibly emphasized by Phi bert Hamerton,—one of the most gifted and able among English art-critics,— namely, that ‘‘the serious study naked figure is the only possible tion for great figure painting.” plement Nature truth f with He dis- ip Gil- y of the founda- Indeed, one need only examine the various schools of art, from those of Ancient Greece to the leading modern academies, to find everywhere this fundamental law recognized and taught. The greatest of German critics, t he immortal Goethe, appreciated and continually enforced it. His opinions on this point are admirably summed up in a striking review of his ‘‘ Verschiedenes ii Théophile Gautier, 2s. “The esthetics of Goethe [ regard to the plastic and glyptic Stripped of all artifice of style, he writes], the princip arts, are condensed in recognize that they are written Olympus of German art; and it imposed on all branches of art which has gained for hit it is also, and above all, the ature of his principles and “Goethe is essentially pagan ; his literary works but in these by this intellectual Ju ber Kunst,” from the pen of the accomplished es which he professed in this species of appendix. laid down as laws rather than counsels, we piter enthroned upon the is not only his omnipotence, the despotism he detached and, so to s he everywhere glorifies antiquity. m this title of Olympian ; his artistic tastes. not only in peak, scientific fragments 14 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. which we are now considering ; we find here a mass of notes on Greek vases, medals, and engraved stones; he follows up attentively all productions, all creations, all memoirs having reference to antiquity. When the excavations were begun on a large scale at Pompeii, he described in detail the paintings and objects discovered there ; he was conversant with everything that was published, in @// languages, on the subject of his predilection ; it was he who authenticated the paintings of Polygnotus and Philostratus. It appears that this love of antiquity, of pure art, was innate with Goethe, and radiated from his entire person- ality. .... He placed art above everything ; he wished that it should be a star, eo to shed its light over all our actions, all our productions, like the beautiful Attic sun gilding with its rays the inimitable marbles of the Acropolis, the lines and contours of which it has not wearied of caressing for centuries. By the high position he occupied at the court of Weimar, which the Grand Duke Charles Augustus had made the intellectual capital of Germany, Goethe was in a position to efficaciously patronize the arts and to lead them in the direction he desired. While giving his counsels to artists, and principally to sculptors, to whom antique art furnished more themes than to painters, he indicated at the same time to sovereigns, and personages influential by their position or their fortune, the means of favoring the development of art and the subjects which should be chosen, as much in the interest of the art as for the advantage of those who patronized them, and for the promotion of public taste. He would have liked to see, for example, the vases, columns, temples, and obelisks, in promenades and parks, replaced by statues and, principally, busts. ‘The most beautiful mon- ument of man,’ says he, ‘is man. A beautiful bust is preferable to all the architecture of our gardens, and it is the best monument one can raise in remembrance of a great man, a relative, or a friend. One should not too exclusively occupy sculptors with insipid allegories, or historic groups and statues, where art is always restrained by exigencies of every nature. No one should be astonished to see in some council-chamber, or any other official locality, a group representing Venus and Adonis, or some subject drawn from Homer.’ “But if Goethe is so passionate an admirer of antiquity, it must not be concluded, therefore, that he admits only antigue subjects ; his lofty intelligence would grasp too well the faultiness of this method, which has produced among us the deplorable school of David; and this last example, perhaps, inspired him to avoid the breakers on which too exclusive a doctrine would have dashed him. He counsels one to simply study Nature. ““On /éte days [he says] let the young artist go to watch the peasants dance ; let him study well their movements and their poses; let him clothe the young girl with the tunic of a nymph; let him lengthen the ears of his peasant and, if needful, give him cloven feet; if he has grasped Nature well, and known how to suitably modify her corporeal forms, while carefully preserving the movement, no one will suspect the quarter whence he has taken his models and they will swear that he has copied from the antique.’ “Have we not here the entire explanation of ¢e antigue, and does not the ation not secret of this inimitable perfection lie in exact and scrupulous obser LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 15 of what is ugly, but of the beautiful in Vazwre? Is it not also the province of art to gather together beauties scattered here and there, and combine them in a harmonious whole, an ideal model, whose movements can be infinitely varied, but whose forms should be always reproduced, thus avoiding the indelicate and the grotesque. Harmony is what makes the power of the antique, and Goethe recom- mends it everywhere and unceasingly. ““«There exist in Nature [he says] many things which separately are beauti- ful. But geniws consists in finding the point of contact by which they can be attached to each other, and a masterpiece thus be produced. There is not a shrub nor a tree to which one cannot adda value by means of a rock, a pool of water, or a horizon skillfully arranged. It is the same in regard to the human form and all animated beings !’ “When Goethe recommends the study of Nature, it is not of szanimaze nature that he speaks; it is not of landscape, on which he dilates but little ; still less of still life, which he does not so much as mention. Nature, for him, is man. Man, according to him, includes everything ; and the knowledge of man, far from being a limited physiology, comprehends the study of all the arts and all the sciences. ‘““«Man [he says] is the most elevated, the unique object of the plastic arts ; to inth of his construction, understand him, and in order not to go astray in the lab a universal acquaintance with organic nature is indispensable. The study of inorganic bodies, as well as of physical and chemical phenomena, is not less necessary to the artist, who should know their theoretical principles. The human form cannot be understood by the simple inspection of its outward surface ; the interior must be uncovered and fathomed, the connections and correspondences observed and the differences estimated ; those mysterious portions of the being which are the base and foundation must be compared and understood. All this must be done if we wish to get a clear idea of this wonderful object which moves before our eyes in the waves of the vital element.’ ’ We find the same ideas in a masterly essay by Charles Blanc, who writes as follows: “After having admired the universe, man comes to contemplate himself. He recognizes that the human form is the one which corresponds to the mind—that, regulated by proportion and symmetry, free by movement, superior through beauty, the human form, of all living forms, is the only one capable of fully expressing thought.” Géréme, as we have said, apprehended this truth at the very beginning of his career. On his return to the atelier, with perceptions broadened and sharpened by a year of indefatigable study at Rome, where he had sketched indiscrimi- nately landscape, architecture, animals, and figures—he felt more keenly than ever his pressing need of practice in drawing and painting from the nude. He set himself to make a life-size study, and the result was the Combat de Cogs. To 16 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, him it was only a study and, in his already severely critical estimation, an unsatisfactory one. But the trained eye of Delaroche instantly perceived its nality, and elegance of style, by which an every- amazing qualities of verity, ori day incident in that epoch of Greek life was elevated into the domain of classic art. At his express command, and despite the trembling protest of the young alon of 1847. It was accepted and, though neophyte, the canvas was sent to the placed twenty meters above the line, where hung Couture’s imposing Decadence of the Romans, and Delacroix’s famous Shipwreck, the simple s¢udy carried off a medal, was bought by the French Government, and assigned a place among the Immortals in the Gallery of the Luxembourg. It was this first picture which attracted the attention of Gautier, who warmly praised its ‘‘ delicacy and exquisite distinction,” and pronounced it ‘‘a composition no Master would disown.” Our attention has several times been drawn to another criticism of this same picture. It reads as follows: “The subject was thus early in his history characteristic of Gérome, who has shown a decided preference for incidents in themselves horrible or morally repulsive.” This extraordinary accusation,—the shocking injustice of which is evident to any student of Géréme’s works,—is found in a volume entitled ‘‘ Modern Painters and their Paintings,” by Sarah Tytler. We should accord it only the silent contempt it merits, were it not that the book is designed, as we see empha- sized in the preface, ‘‘for the use of schools and learners in art. To say the least, it is discouraging to take up, in this enlightened age, a treatise with this aim, and realize that so marked a narrowness of apprehension exists in a mind that presumes to guide and teach others. We prefer to believe it the result of ignorance of the subject treated, rather than rank it with a like judgment of that inimitable philosopher and moralist, Balzac, who, even after posterity had begun to estimate, at their real value, his stupendous merits, still found detractors to cast upon him what Gautier trenchantly denominates as “that hackneyed reproach of immorality, last insult of powerless and jealous mediocrity, as also of pure stupidity.” Hamerton also, keenly realizing the hurtful influence of illiberal criticism, deplores the ignorance, which in reality is the chief cause of the “difficulty with which people, not familiar with the naked figure, come to sever the ideas of nudity and immorality”; and adds: “If writers who are destitute of pictorial perceptions, yet have a command of language, become for some reason warmly interested in a discussion about artists, they are able to do considerable harm, because they combine the ignorance and willfulness of infancy with the com- bative skill of trained intellectual method.” LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 19 We heartily agree with Mr. Hamerton, and are content to offset the opinions of this class of self-styled critics, as superficial and incompetent as they are detri- mental to the progress of true art, by the judgment of so learned and world renowned an authority as Alexandre Dumas, who writes of Gérome : ‘A serious talent, and of an elevated order; an artist who looks at his art nobly and who devotes to it his existence breathes fr sighed, ‘ Alz every instant, every thought; one Zy again before such works as his; above all, when, like us, one has ;! the standard of art is being lowered |’ Or to quote the words of that other distinguished immortal, the eloquent and gifted director of the Comédie Francaise, Jules Claretie : ““Géréme can, with good right, treat these antique subjects and vivify them with his art, so sober, so chaste, so pure.” And again : ‘His art is like his person, like his intelligence ; everything which bears his signature, be it bronze or canvas, sketch or marble, is true, vigorous and dis- tinguished, like himself. In a word, Gérome is a thoroughbred.” And it is with peculiar satisfaction that we hail the advent of an American writer like Mrs. C. H. Stranahan, who, in her ‘History of French Painting” (published by Scribner in 1888), has made the most valuable contribution in the English language to the art literature of our day. “It is a volume that might well be used asa text-book in all art academies, and that certainly should have a prominent place in every public and private library. Although one may differ with some of the author’s conclusions, the work reveals broad and thoughtful study, combined with a fine capacity for criticism, and a literary style remarkable for grace, lucidity, and vigor. We take pleasure in quoting freely from Mrs. Stranahan’s admirable book. In opening her study of Géréme, she says : “The artistic qualities of Gérome have been the subject of much discussion. His rare endowments are a study of great interest. He is an Orientalist of so intime a treatment that that alone would suffice to render him eminent; he has executed great historic works, that singly might make his fame universal ; he is so learned a painter of the antique, that a close study of this department of his work produces a sense of amazed wonder in view of the underlying knowledge necessary to afford his significant touch of motifs, by which he introduces us into family circles and enables us to chat of everyday affairs with the heroes of one and another period; he has applied to incident the classic treatment, and originated a new style, the refined and graceful éo-grec ; he has, even at the time when he was one of the closest of Nature’s students, made harmony of line so AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. prominent a part of his work, that in the difficulty of assigning him to any one cl s of painting, it has been suggested by Strahan that he be termed ‘a sculptor of canvas’; he has attacked and conquered some of the most difficult problems of art execution—such as uniting the most finished treatment with great rapidity of movement (as in The Runners of the Pasha, ‘the catching of a motion” as it were, by instantaneous photography); the greatest success of fore-shortening 5 ecution of Marshal (as in the flat level of Czesar’s dead body and that in the Ney), and difficulties of design are flung broadcast in his works.” Referring to some of the scenes in which Géréme simply relates, without comment, a historical fact, such as the exposing of the heads of the rebel beys before the Mosque of El Assaneyn, or where he depicts an everyday scene in the slave-market, leaving it to tell its own pathetic tale, Mrs. Stranahan speaks of the truthful por- trayal of the ‘‘ indif- ference of familiar custom,” adding : 1 “Many critics | feel that some ex- oression of the re- volting impression made by these aeads, would, but for the coldness of eae ‘ : ae the artist himself, have crept into this victure. But besides yeing subordinately a correct representation of the national characteristics, is not the effect sought, the emotion of horror, which also has its reverse side, sympathy, greatly enhanced by the picture's supplying no comment on itself, which would, indeed, be wholly superfluous! This reticent flash of an instant of facts, left to tell all there is to say, is peculiarly Gérome’s. This and Zhe Slave Mart, with others of this artist's works that are severely criticised by sensitive judges as of a harsh coldness, become, in their full suggestion, of a nature to produce deep feeling, a thrilling sensation of anger or pity for the wrong depicted. This power is inherent in the wide gamut across which the antitheses represented in them sweep—in the contrast to the absence of all feeling, of such extreme provocatives to feeling. The effect, where, as with Gérome, the scene is given with no strain of fact, but by simply the revelations of an instant, is thrilling. It is the significant point of these subjects, the one on which, we may conjecture, their selection hinged, and evinces a keen appreciation by the artist of the means of exciting emotion. It is also illustrated most powerfully in that selected moment of the Duel after the Masquerade, when LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 21 Death, grim and relentless, not as a mask easily thrown off, comes among the masqueraders at their invitation, and the victor, in the character of a chief of the Iroquois, and his second, forgetting that he is Harlequin, turn indifferently away, leaving the pallid victim, with his mask of Pierrot dashed aside, to die in the arms of his second, dressed as the Duke of Guise. The horror here is again doubled by the antithesis. Through and through it, in all the contours, in the attitudes, even in the back of the receding victor, is apparent the significance, which Géréme’s patient study of nature can so well express. In all his works may be traced this clear, direct, epigrammatic presentation. Truly his pictures are but ‘reports’ of scenes, acts, incidents; but in his hands they completely escape becoming a purely literary art. He simplifies them into the presentation of the essential and significant verities, and unconcernedly leaves them to impress as they may. But well may he be confident of the effect, for with his penetrating feeling, which is a something too susceptibly perceptive to be denominated mere ocular vision, and his wide sweep of the gamut of significant expression, he always touches the exact keys. Returning again to ‘‘la belle France,” we find in Za Galerie Contemporaine a masterly review from the pen of Emile Bergerat, known to all the world as “Caliban,” the witty philosopher of the Paris Figaro, and still more highly esteemed as poet, dramatist, and art critic, worthily wearing in the latter capacity the mantle bequeathed to him by his intimate friend and kinsman, ‘‘le grand Théo,” as Gautier was familiarly called. After brief reference to the wealth of knowledge and imagination displayed in the pictures which he places under the head of ‘‘ Fantaisies,” Bergerat continues : “Scenes from Oriental life form the most considerable portion of Géréme’s works ; the numerous voyages of the artist furnish him with an inexhaustible quantity of picturesque themes, which find their fountain-head in his great powers of observation. But the paintings devoted to the restoration of the antique are those which, taken all in all, are dearest to the master; it is through them he awaits his meed of fame, to them that he has confided the survival of his name. His expectation will not be deceived on this point. Under this head can be found canvases that exhale beauty like a page of Tacitus or Juvenal. “J wish in the beginning to emphasize this truth: that which gives Gérome his superiority over most of his rivals, and establishes his very distinct personality, is his incontestable erudition as a man and an artist. He has innate tact and taste; but he nourishes them with fruit from the tree of science. It may appear stale and behind the times thus to boast of qualities of a literary order in a painter, and to praise him for being well informed regarding the subjects he treats; but ever since I began to look at and study pictures, it has not yet been demonstrated to me that a profound knowledge of the subjects portrayed is hurtful to their execution. Truth merits research among the graphic documents and literary monuments of history as well as among living and contemporaneous models, and NV LEON GEROME. bo n LIFE AND WORKS OF JE the farther we advance in the path of progress, the more will art be tinged by science, and the more will it adorn itself with the colors of knowledge.” We leave for a moment these paintings, which revive so skillfully the con- ditions of life in the time of Pericles and the Cesars, and turn to those which are drawn from actual observation during Gérome’s many voyages—especially in Egypt, Arabia, Palestine, Turkey, Russia, Italy, Algeria, Morocco, and Spain. When we find that by actual count we have nearly two hundred canvases which may be denominated ‘‘ Pictures of Travel,” we come face to face with the impos- sibility of giving any adequate részmé of the artist’s bewildering achievements in this direction. His numerous and well-filled portfolios of sketches—which till now have been for the most part ‘‘sealed books,” save to a few intimate friends— reveal the source of these truthful and vivid reproductions of life in these pictur- esque and fascinating countries. We congratulate ourselves again that a morning spent by Gautier in Géréme’s studio, over these very portfolios, inspired this gifted writer to embody his impressions in a delightful article, entitled, ‘‘Géréme ; Pictures, Studies, and Sketches of Travel,” from which we quote the following pages, that will in a measure reveal to us the broad and solid foundation on which this Master-Artist has reared his Temple Beautiful. “The countries where Islam reigns are entirely virgin, in point of view of art. The fear of idolatry caused the promulgator of the Koran to proscribe the ect, Mahomet imitated Mose: representation of the human figure. In this r although the Bible speaks of the heads of the cherubim at the corners of the Ark of the Lord, and of the oxen upholding the sea of brass, the exception only con- the idea of the unity of God could easily have been forgotten by firms the rule ; uncivilized nations, scarcely freed from polytheism and the worship of fetiches, ry always prone to confound the image with the idea it symbolized; this nece law perhaps suppressed sculpture and painting,—in a word, all the plastic arts,— and the genius of the Orient was obliged to fall back on architecture, ornamenta- x tion, arabesques, and an ingenious mé/ange of colors; the living world was closed to man, and dogma—a dogma moreover, rigorously followed—deprived him of Nature. While the Occident, under the beneficent influence of Catholicism,—(we say Catholicism and not Christianity, for Luther and Calvin are as detrimental to artas Mahomet),—was expanding in marvelous creations, and counting its painters and sculptors by hundreds, the Orient was combining and arranging mathematical lines, in a thousand ways, for the decoration of its alhambras, scarcely daring to introduce flowers into the labyrinth of broken lines and long legends of cufic letters which form the background of Arabic ornamentation. They had archi- tects, algebraists, physicians, musicians, and poets, but no aréis/s, in the sense in which we use this word to-day. “ However, the Orient produces, in its land beloved of the sun, the most ation, beautiful races, the purest types; and the human clay, less altered by civili seems here to retain the still visible imprint of a divine hand. LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 23 “Tt has preserved, at least partly, the drapery, a noble garment which plays around the form without concealing it; it has the privilege of elegant and severe attitudes, which our scanty clothes render impossible. Since several centuries, all this wealth is lost; and more—under jealous veils, and behind the gratings of harems, are fading away, mysterious beauties, leaving neither trace nor souvenir; roses, whose perfume can only be conjectured, since they have blossomed only for the master ; heads as exquisite as any Raphael could have designed ; bodies as perfect as any Phidias could have modeled! Singular anomaly ! “One cannot hope that the countries dominated by Islamism will renounce their peculiar civilization to embrace the ideas set forth by our own ; but what is forbidden to the faithful may be permitted to the unbeliever. “Until now, art, wholly absorbed by the Greek ideal, has not troubled itself about this immense world, peopled by unknown races, by unused types, and which could refresh, by new subjects, its exhausted inspiration. “The Occident, in the time of the crusades, only brought back from Africa and Syria ideas in regard to architecture and ornamentation; if the Saracen influence is visible in the art of the Middle Ages, and if the mosques have lent their minarets and even their crosses to Gothic chapels, one does not perceive that the statuary and painting of these epochs have been modified by acquaintance with, and study of, these Oriental types. The representations of Moors and Saracens in bas-reliefs and miniatures are works of pure imagination. Later, Jean Bellin made a journey to Constantinople and reproduced, with the dry and patient fidelity which characterizes him, figures, costumes, and monuments, whose s¢rangeness, doubtless, struck him more forcibly than did their beauty, and which had no effect on art. “The Orient, from its picturesque side, was discovered, or rather invented, by Victor Hugo, toward the year 1828; the Occidental-Oriental Divan of Goethe had not yet been translated; and even had it been, the French people would not have understood its mysterious poetry; but the ‘Orientales’ (of Hugo) produced a dazzling effect: this blue heaven trave od by white storks, this glittering sun, thes streams of gold and precious stones, these pachas leaning on tigers, these resplendent sultanas with their shining blond tresses, languidly raising their eyelashes stained with k’hol; these palms powdered by the wind of the desert, these cities with their metallic domes and minarets of ivory stretching up into the azure, these files of camels swaying their long ostrich-like necks against a ruddy horizon, all this poetry, as dazzling as the light, as intoxicating as hasheesh, caused a vertigo of admiration—above all, among the painters. Soon Decamps headed the Turkish patrol through the streets of Smyrna, Marilhat started for Egypt, and Eugéne Delacroix came back from Morocco; later, other artists joined the caravan where Félicien David beat the drum. However, we must say that, in spite of many masterpieces, the Orient was rather reproduced with its strange landscape, its singular architectural forms, its brilliant carnival of costumes and its varied wealth of color, than studied as to the sculptural beauty of its types. Marilhat, more of a landscape than a historical painter, has peopled his admirable canvases with purely episodic figures ; Decamps has often only seen in 24 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. his Turks, his Zeibecks, and his Arnauts, a brilliant or somber spot to be brought into relief against the chalky masonry of a white wall, although he proved by his Supplice des Crochets, and his Bazar de Smyrne, that he was able to reproduce Oriental types in all their purity. Delacroix expressed, with rare power, the African character, but sought rather for color and movement than for lineament in Nature. Théodore Chasseriau, who seemed endowed with a mysterious in- stinct in painting exotic races, saw only French Africa, and, better than any one else had done, he depicted the narrow, oval face ; the languishing, parted lips; the melancholy black eyes, shadowed by long, painted lashes; the delicate nose with sensitive nostrils, the round arms and dainty hands, the statuesque limbs and feet, the voluptuous attitude, and all the rhythm of the bodies swaying beneath strange, floating draperies. “His Jewish Women of Constantine astonished one like a dream: he would doubtless have penetrated farther into the land of the sun, if Death had not suddenly covered him with its shadow, for he cherished the longing and desire to see these beautiful countries, as if they had been an absent Fatherland. “Gérome has made the pilgrimage dreamed of by Théodore Chasseriau. He has seen Cairo, that capital of the East, that city of caliphs, where Saracen art shone with such vivid brilliancy while the West was still plunged in uncouth barbarity. He has roamed through the winding streets bordered by houses with overhanging stories and latticed moucharabys, shaded by striped awnings or rush mats, with here and there a slender palm opening its leafy fan against the blue of heaven, or the minaret of some mosque stretching up, encircled by its brace- ets of balconies. He has followed this crowd, composed of all the types of the Orient, from the Arab of noble race and the stern Wahabite, to the negro with his bestial features ; from the Arnaut, with the nose and eye of the eagle, to the ylacid fellah, with the face of an Egyptian sphinx ; this crowd which separates under the lash of the cowrbach before the horse of the Bey, accompanied by his sais,—and which draws back against the wall so as not to touch the wife of the cadi, passing like a phantom in her domino of taffetas, with her face covered by a mask of black horse-hair, and chiding the negress who carries a child ina red tarbouch and jacket embroidered with gold. “The young artist, accompanied by several friends, has ascended the Nile in one of those cangues, whose commodious and picturesque installation makes the journey through Egypt a veritable pleasure-trip. Photography, carried to-day to the perfection we all know, exempts artists from copying monuments and pub- lic buildings by its absolutely faithful proofs, to which a happy choice of a point of view and moment of reproduction add a great value of effect. Therefore it was not to this point that Gérome directed his efforts; his masterly studies as a painter of history, his talent as a draughtsman,—refined, elegant, exact, and yet full of style,—a particular perception, which we can well call ethnographic, and which will become more and more necessary to the artist in this age of universal and rapid locomotion, when every tribe on this planet will be visited, in whatever distant archipelago it may conceal itself—all this qualified him, better than any GOLGOTHA TTi1S aeeNgeie HD 1868 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. other, to represent this simple detail which modern explorers of the Orient have neglected, till now, for landscape, public structures, and mere color—I mean, man / ““Gérome has kindly permitted us to examine the contents of his portfolios, and to study, one by one, these pencil sketches, taken on the wing; rapid notes gathered from real life, without preparation, without arrangement, without system—with genuine abandon and a charming familiarity. What pleasure to surprise talent thus ex déshabillé/ to be initiated into the impression of the artist moment of Nature’s inspiration; into his thought, translated, or Sila Umar tather c allized, by several characters in shorthand! We love dearly these ibblings,— wor which later are made into phrases in the pictures finished at leisure. “Besides, the slightest of Géréme’s sketches are drawn with a touch so firm, so pure, so precise, and so finished in their carelessness, that one wonders what caz be added by further labor ! “The artist trav- eler has made numer- ous pencil portrait- studies of different characteristic types ; there are fellahs, coe Copts, Arabs, negroes ; F ff of mixed blood from a Sennaar and from os Kordofan,—so exactly observed that they could be used in the anthropological treatises of M. Serres,— drawn in so masterly a manner that they will make a success of any picture in which they find a place. “The fellahs and the Copts have not changed since the time of Moses: such as you see them on the frescoes of the palaces or tombs of Amenoteph, of Toutmes, and of Sesourtasen—such are they to-day. We find always the large, flat face, with the rounded cheek-bones, which seems to have retained, like the Sphinx, the mark of the blow of Cambyses ; the strange eyes, with the outer angle raised and accented by a touch of antimony; the s profile; a mouth like an enormous cage, while on the sensual folds of the ightly flat nose, making a defective lips rests a mingled grimace and smile, which imparts an indefinable expression unknown in Europe. The chachias and burnous which envelop these strange physiognomies, cause them to resemble mummies partly unswathed, and with the face uncovered. 26 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, “The Arabs are distinguished by the nose, an eye like a bird of prey, the more Caucasian structure of the head, and the openness of the facial angle ; the negroes, in their gaze of animal placidity or childish heedlessness, scarcely betray an intelligence as opaque as their skin is dark; their flat nostrils and thick mouths can inhale with impunity the flaming blast of the desert, even when laden with the imperceptible dust raised by the shamsinn. “Several women, persuaded by a bacchich, timidly lift their veils and display a sleepy, mournful beauty, of the phantom-like order peculiar to the women of he East. ee “The camel—that strange animal who seems, with the elephant, the rhi- noceros, the hippopotamus, the giraffe, and the ostrich, to have survived the great forty-day deluge, and to have remained upon the earth as a specimen of the monstrous zo6logical furniture of the primitive world—has been studied by our traveler from all sides ; its behavior, its fore-shortening, its attitudes when on the march or in repose, kneeling, ruminating, dreaming, licking its chops, show- ing its teeth, stretching out on the ground its enormous neck, or fanning, with its long lids, an eye as soft as that of a woman, the only beauty of this antedi- luvian deformity. The artist has reproduced with extraordinary care the humps and callous hide, the awkward dislocations and warpings, so to speak, of this fantastic animal, as well as the unexpected silhouettes traced by this irregular bundle of bones on the white sand or the blue sky. In these sketches one ‘an distinguish perfectly between the heavy pack-camel and the slender mahari, which is to the former what the English thoroughbred is to a common dr horse. ‘We should never finish were we to describe the infinite number of details gathered together on these loose sheets. Great undulations of ground, clusters of date trees, masses of doum palms, sagghvehs whose wheel raises and tells the little rosary of pots; cafés, okkels, camping-grounds, corners of pyramids ; the broken profile of the Sphinx, vz s of antique contours, doors of mosques—everything that the chance of travel offers that is new and interesting to an eye that knows how to see, a hand that knows how to reproduce. “Among the sketches in colors, we notice three which are to be finished for the coming Exposition [of 1857]. “The first represents the two colossi of Medinet-Abou, rising from the midst of the plain at the foot of a mountain which they fair y dwarf. Never has ancient tgypt, with its frenzy of genius for the creation of enormities, cast a more tremendous defiance in the face of Time; should the shoulders of this planet quiver in an earthquake, she might succeed, perhaps, oy dint of repeated shakings, in cracking the granite epidermis of the giants she upholds, but she could never overturn them. The last cataclysm of the world will find them in the same spot, corroded, exhausted, wrinkled, disfigured, but a ways immovably seated in that everlasting and impassible pose—the open hands resting upon the stony knees—the rugged heads, sculptured by thunderbolts, turned toward the infinite. “ Behind these colossi, or rather these mountains in human form, a sterile ridge—powdered and baked for 6000 years under a burning sun—throws LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. to N cascades of light from its rugged steeps over its blue crevasses; the heaven stretches out its cloth of indigo, covered with a film of warm, sandy mist. At the foot of the stony monsters,—one of which is the famous Memnon, whom the ancients heard chanting the approach of Aurora, and who was rendered forever voiceless by a reparation ordered by the Emperor Hadrian,—in the immense shadow which they cast, a caravan has halted, seeking shelter from the intense heat; a man, perched upon a camel, does not reach as high as the toes of these prodigious statues. “The effect of this picture is most thrilling; the Orient is not here daubed with mine de Saturne tints, in which it is too often painted; it has the subdued light, the ardent pallor, the tones of iron at a white heat found in the real countries of the sun. “The second canvas shows a company of recruits marching in the desert. An Arnaut, with his gun passed behind his neck like a stick, advances at the head of this procession of unhappy creatures, who, with manacled wrists, coupled and chained together like convicts, exhibit the most frightful despair: their feet kiclk up the fine dust as they stumble along, their brains boiling and seething under a devouring, implacable sun. “On the shifting sand, white as pulverized sandstone, the spongy feet of the camels have left large impressions; the wind has traced, as if on the water, capricious designs, effaced and renewed without ceasing; it is almost as sad as the Russian Soldiers —amusing themselves at word of command !—so much admired at the Universal Exposition. “The third, and perhaps the most beautiful sketch of all, represents Arnauts yer in a room whose walls have for their sole ornament a collection of guns ; ral persons are standing, with their feet close together and the palms of their hands turned up in an attitude of worship; on the border of a narrow carpet, an old man with a white beard, standing a little to the front, recites the suras of the Koran, to which his companions listen with religious rapture. In the foreground is a row of babouches, shoes or savates, a peculiarly Oriental detail which the artist has had the boldness not to omit, and which does not in the least disturb the gravity of the composition. A rising smile dies away at the sight of these types, so pure, so noble, so characteristic ; of these attitudes, so beautiful in their simplicity ; of this assembly, which does so well what it does!” A fitting continuation of these masterly pages is furnished by a fascinating essay on ‘‘Gérome and his Work,” from the pen of Frederic Masson, one of the most graceful and vivid writers of modern times. He gives us an alluring glimpse of the ideal life during Géréme’s first sojourn in the land of the sun, which we shall amplify when we describe in detail the artist’s adventures during this trip and subsequent ones through Upper Egypt, Arabia, and Syria. “What the pen cannot describe [says Masson] is the loving sweetness of these piercing eyes, the look of resolution and virility which is the predominating 28 LIF COME. 2 AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON G characteristic of this physiognomy; the will to undertake and press onward expressed by the whole personality. He would willingly have been one of those indefatigable explorers, who, endlessly journeying, risk their lives to see some- thing new; one of those who, to contemplate unknown stars, go to where the earth gives way under their feet. To seek, to attempt, to undertake, this is what is necessary to their existence—not fo dream / Their intellects, exact and keen, demand facts, not phrases. A search for the truth is Gérome’s uninterrupted occupation. It is this conscientiousness in research which binds together all his work. It is the same when he reorganizes the sports of ancient Rome: when 1e represents the dramas of, modern history; when he depicts the life of the Orient, and, finally, when, in the midst of these landscapes he knows so well, he ylaces some national figure, such as Bonaparte, whose strange physiognomy and frame, almost ascetic in their meagerness, he delights to render, at the moment when ‘his imperial star arises in the East !’ “To rest himself after immense efforts, Géroéme started for Egypt. It was the first of those voyages which have exercised so keen an influence on the vainter, and which, leading him by the picturesque toward the modern, have enabled him to reproduce, in so inimitable a manner, the scenes and characters of that Orient which is being each day more and more encroached upon by European customs and manners. ‘ Gérome seems born for these distant voyages to which one must bring vigor of body and decision of mind. Always up, always alert and indefatigable, he commands the caravan with an authority which no one contes The first to rise in the morning, he superintends the departure ; then, erect in his saddle, he keeps going through the long hours, smoking, hunting, tracing with rapid stroke in his sketch-book a movement or a silhouette. Sc reely arrived at camp, behold him commencing a study—neither rain nor wind having the power to move him from his camp-stool. Then, the palette carefully wiped and the brushes thoroughly cleaned, what a delightful companion at the table under the tent! What animation, what good-humored appreciation of the nonsense of the younger ones ; what frank gayety and willing remembrance of former jesting. And through this Gallic humor, which has its flavor of the soil,—this wit peculiar to the coméé where he was born,—how one perceives the man of high intellectual culture, who has read much, and who knows how to read! Who, for his intimate friend and soul’s companion, has chosen that other joyous spirit, the immortal author of ‘‘La Cigué” and the ‘‘ Effrontés”—Emile Augier ! “It was no play to visit Egypt in 1856. It is true that one did not then meet there those hordes of tourists who spoil the landscape and d isfigure the monu- ments! Ancient Egypt was still itself after the convention of Alexandria: several old soldiers of the empire alone represented the European element. Reform had not yet got the better of old manners nor of ancient customs. Thé fellah, in the rigidity of his attitudes, pr basalt. The Nile, where steamboats were unknown, was enlivened by whole ved the hieratic aspect of statues of nations of birds so tame that they were scarcely disturbed by the slow passage of the light boats (cangues), The river full of fish, the banks stocked @ ANANHA 2% LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 31 with game, perpetually changing scenery, brightened by the vivid coloring of the inhabitants,—over all a deli an equal love painting, hun cious blue sky,—and four gay companions, loving with ting, and fishing—what a joyous existence! And how easy to picture Géréme living thus for four months, going by easy stages from Damietta to Phila. Then coming back to Cairo and installing himself in a palace, cordially placed at the disposition of the travelers by that glorious Soliman Pacha whose incredible romance has lately been de ing volume. There were ibed in a charm- four months more of study and labor, from which resulted those pictures that, in the work of Gérome, best reproduce the vivid impressions of the things he has seen.” gs Another great critic anc traveler, one of the most eminent of French Orient- alists, the distinguished Maxime Du Camp, writes of these Oriental silhouettes : “Just as Meissonier is able to portray an entire epoch in one figure, so M. Gérome is expert in particu miniature, for his painting, yecomes more exact and € arizing a certain race in a single person, especially in which is almost too delicate for a large composition, aborate in proportion as his canvas is limited. He, 1imself, an intrepid traveler, of a keen, vigorous temperament ; an impression- able character ; a penetrating intellect ; circumspect, delicate, and quick to seize oints on the wing—has the air of a Ja/ikare, and one is quite surprised that he does not wear the Greek cap and /wstanel/e. No one has gone farther than he in his observation of the appearance, the manners, and customs of the Egyptians of Cairo, the Jews of Palestine, the Russians of the Crimea, and the modern Greeks. le has studied them with a rare acuteness and conscientiousness, and while examining into the smallest details, he has not failed to grasp the essential features of the Oriental races. “One can perhaps object that M. Gérome’s touch is a little dry, and his color- ing often too sharp; but when Time shall have laid its powerful Aafine on his canvases, they will be harmonized into soft and deep tones. And what is more, they will have the very appreciable advantage of not losing in growing old, for they are finished in the highest possible degree.” We may here pause to consider a point which has been much harped on by a certain class of critics, who, for the most part, are theoretically and practically ignorant of the A B C of the art they attempt to criticise, and distinguish themselves only by a blind adhesion to certain doctrines promulgated by a certain would-be school of art. These oracles affect to deny Géréme the title of great artist, on the score that he is not what they understand as a ‘‘ colorist.” We are not desirous of entering into a controversy on this point. ‘‘ Chacun @ son gowt,” says the old proverb, and, as Géréme very quietly remarked in his early youth, ‘‘ the public will be the judge.” Real art-lovers have sufficiently shown their appreciation by securing his masterpieces often while still mere sketches on the easel, and disputing eagerly Is} LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. the possession of those which have several times changed hands at public sale. Time, that supreme judge, has proven the intrinsic and ever-increasing value of his art, based on true and noble methods. We cannot refrain, however, from quoting one or two authorities, whose lucid and trenchant opinions on this vexed question of ‘‘ What constitutes a grea? artist?” are well worth our attention. Says Bergerat, in the able treatise before cited : “Tf the name of painter, and the reputation of being a good painter, is to be appropriated only by workers in color, and if a pumpkin well represented ought, in public estimation, to equal in value the School of Athens, of Raphael, we must renounce serious consideration of this manifestation of human genius, and criticism inevitably becomes sterile and objectless. To be sure, naturalism is a fine achievement of modern intelligence, and I am one of the first to glorify the good resulting therefrom; but it is not, and never will be, in art, anything save the adjective power of talent, of which the Sundamental power is the idea. “Now, the word ‘idea’ comprises also its culture, and the culture of the idea is science, or what is otherwise known as acquirements. I be- lieve no more in the ignorance of genius than I do in the 2s and iconscience of beauty. The gift is nothing if it ends only in promis hopes, for Nature rebels against inaction of forces, and the most fertile ground grows fallow and sterile, even in the full sunlight, if it is not plowed up and sown. If any one declines to admit that the operation of the intelli- gence by which a man succeeds in conceiving and realizing a grand ethnographic scene,—such, for example, as the Pollice Ve order to that which impels M. Vollon to choose a motif from still life, one 2—is of a superior intellectual might as well declare that a bee-hive, the construction of which is admirable, is as admirable as St. Peter's at Rome. As well give instinct the precedence over intelligence ; as well proclaim the public inutility of those conservatories of the beautiful called libraries and museums. “Further, those who are endowed with a sensibility of the retina, as exceptional as it is unconscious, act most thoughtlessly in endeavoring to confine the art of painting to the reproduction of the phy cal phenomena of lights and colors. Their presumptuous theories have produced impressionism LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 33 and fachism (or blotching). Must we then conclude that man, nude or clothed in brilliant stuffs, is, in reality, only a dab of color, whose form confounds itself with the atmosphere? What becomes then of the expressive power of painting ? To what sense does its eloquence appeal, and in what terms does this language, stripped of its alphabet and its style, speak to the human intelligence? Géréme must have asked himself all this, when the critics have adjudged him guilty of a crime in not being specially born what they are pleased to style a colori. He must have thought that the art he practiced must be the lowest of all the arts, if one is not to include the qualities of observation, picturesque design, and compo- sition in making a picture. Here, indeed, lies his natural superiority: not a painter of the present age can compose a picture as well as he—the greatest among them not excepted. Géréme has the sentiment of unity and order ; with him the scene is always complete and completely treated ; each item is placed on its own plane of interest and co-operates proportionately to the general effect of the scene to which it contributes. “A great and rare quality, with which poets are generally more liberally endowed than painters, and which, under the name of god¢ (an expression inade- quately rendered in English by the word /as#e), remains the dominant quality of the Latin race. Education does not suffice to give it, whatever one may think, and do not see wherein it is so common and inferior to the gift of color! We must take care not to go astray, nor to lead the public astray; a bit of good painting is not necessarily a picture; one has not made a poem because one has written a fragment. Those who rebel the most against the teaching of the co/e are yerhaps not capable of treating intelligently a single one of the subjects submitted to its artists in the competitive examination. Now, it seems to me that to be incapable of a thing proves one to be inferior to those who are capable of it. -erhaps there exists a /achiste who has conceived in the depths of his soul a com- position superior to the Podlice Verso, but this fachiste has not yet revealed himself. ‘Tis a hard task to make a picture, as it is a difficult affair to make a book ! This is only too true. Géréme has signed a vast number of canvases which merit the name of pictwre—a title formerly imposing, and which was not lavished, as it is to-day, on the merest daubs of venturesome colorists !” The correctness of Bergerat’s analysis and judgment must be acknowledged by all thoughtful students and practical artists. The same ideas are ably set forth in a volume devoted to ‘‘Art and Artists” by the well-known painter and critic, Charles Timbal. In a charming preface to this series of essays, written by the Vicomte Henri Delaborde, perpetual secretary of the Academy of Fine Arts at Paris, we find Timbal described as a ‘“‘ painter familiarized with all the secrets of practical art, and a connoisseur in the best sense of the term.” In his study on Géréme, Timbal says : “Tt is the custom to place each artist in a camp where he will be, according to his valor or to chance, the standard-bearer or a simple soldier. Some, whether 34 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. they desire or resist, will belong to a group of colorists—others will be ranged among the draughtsmen. To speak truly, Géréme cannot be confined to either of these classifications; without being one of those who, by temperament and without effort, multiply the vibrations, varieties, and harmonies of tones, he sees things as they are, and shows himself a colorist in his own manner; and his brush, in rendering a modified reflection of the exterior brilliancy of things, does not in the least alter the rigorous reality. Let one examine without prejudice any one of ais small canvases: those where he makes the waves to shimmer in the twilight, or this other, flooded by the midday sun,—a street in Cairo in the shadow of its righ walls, or the circus, sheltered by the purple velarium,—the torso of Cléopatra or the Almée, and the gladiator in the arena, wiping off his bloody sweat ; the srofessional man, remembering his own studies, will readily recognize the truth of these reproductions, and also the teachings of nature and of light. “Although Gérome has to-day attained the moment of life in which the artist seems to have nothing to demand of the gods save to preserve intact the gifts he aas received from them, he has not passed the age of progress. .... Those who have examined, with clear perceptions, the later works he has produced, 1ave observed without difficulty the broadening of his manner—the firmness of his touch from the first, and the new richness of his Ad/e. The artist marches y, but in the measure of his fersonal taste. The abreast of the taste of to-dz inventor needed not to show himself more ingenious; the painter has become more of a painter! .... How many masterpieces, applauded yesterday for their powerful effects, their novelty, and the richness of their contrasts, have to-day become gloomy canvases, from which all the beauty has disappeared owing to the inexperience of the artists. The pictures of Géréme, painted with a discreet and prudent hand, have little to fear from the effects of time, and they will probably present themselves to the judgment of the future in all the freshness of their original creation, when of rival works there will remain but a blackened image, exhausted and compromising.” But Gérome is as little disturbed by the clamor of the hostile camps of which Timbal speaks, as he is unspoiled by the admiration of zealous followers. We ion a letter from his intimate friend, the late lamented Emile have in our poss Augier, to his other beloved companion, Alfred Arago, the mere mention of whose names calls up recollections of talents which are the pride and joy not only of the zztime and choice circle of which they were the center, and to which Arago is still fortunately spared, but of the glorious company of illustrious artists and littérateurs who congregate in that modern center of art life—Paris. In this letter, sparkling with wit and caustic observation, we find the follow- ing graphic note on Géréme, and his relation to la critique: “A special characteristic of Géréme [says Augier] is his profound indiffer- ence to the railings of the journals. He pursues a very good system to avoid being irritated by them—he does not read them! And if he sees a friend wax LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 3 on furious under harsh criticism, he tranquillizes him by that celebrated mo? of an amiable actress: ‘It gives them so much pleasure and it costs me so little!’” We must not conclude, however, that the artist considers himself beyond criticism ; on the contrary, no one has more frankly or freely desired the opinions of his fellow-workers, few of whom have approximated the unsparing severity we find in his self-criticism, among the autobiographical notes which we shall transcribe in full. Of the honest and impartial judgment displayed in these simple yet eloquent records of his life, Bergerat writes : “Do you know many artists endowed not only with enough mind and character, but sufficient talent to write of themselves lines such as these? For my part I know nothing more noble than this model confession, which has deeply moved me and inspired me with undying respect for the Master.” This spirit of strict self-criticism, amounting almost to austerity, was a marked trait, even in early youth, as evinced by an episode of his first year in Rome. He was painting, in the Forum, that superb landscape which stretches away from the Capitol, beyond the ruins of the Coliseum, across the Campagna to the foot of the distant mountains. The study was finished in an incredibly short space of time, and in a manner that evoked unanimous praise from his master and fellow-students. But Géréme, distrusting so easy a triumph, and saying to himself, ‘“‘What has been done so quickly cannot be worth much!” deliberately scraped the day’s labor from the canvas and repainted the scene with greater care. This little anecdote reveals the quality of the artist, who, while professiona critics are occupied with their discussions as to the respective merits of the various methods of seeing and reflecting nature, steadily pursues his way towarc his ideal ; his mind wholly concentrated upon his work,—his motto, like that of Apelles, being Vuwlla dies sine linea, gl -he labors on tranquilly, conscientiously, anc confidently, yearly adding to a lengthy list of masterpieces, which betray new depths and beauties of conception and execution, and impart additional luster to an already imperishable fame. As long ago as 1860, De Tanouarn wrote : “What Géréme has achieved up to the present moment is but the Areface of a beautiful book. We await the volume, but if, contrary to all expectation, it does not come, the preface itself will count as a book!” What would he think could he reunite and contemplate the achievements of more than forty years of ardent, unceasing toil! How choose among the gems in this dazzling riviére of jewels collected from the most precious mines of the Old World! Let us yield ourselves to the sway of this potent magician, who trans- 36 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LLON GEROME. ports us by a wave of his powerful hand from idyllic Greece to the brilliant courts of France; from the crowded Coliseum of Ancient Rome to the solitude and desolation of the Arabian desert, and back to the glowing tulip gardens of Holland ; from sunny Spain, where every day is holiday, and a skillful foréador is acclaimed by a joyous populace ‘‘ King of the feast,” to the melancholy banks of the Danube, where, under the crushing despotism of Russia, even ‘‘ recreation in camp” is rigidly enforced, and the sting of the knout compels the song that is often strangled by a sob; from the thronged and picturesque streets of Cairo to the isolated fastnesses of the Convent of Sinai, with a glimpse of the awful tragedy of the Hill of Calvary ! He invites us to walk with Dante on the banks of the Arno, or watch Rem- brandt bending over his etching plate ; to listen with cynical Voltaire to the royal flute-player of Sans Souci, or enjoy the discomfiture of cardinal and courtier at to follow the breakfast table, where the playwright is the equal of the king; Bramant and young Raphael into the Sistine Chapel, whither they have stolen to see the immortal frescoes in the absence of the master, or to join Diogenes in his search for an honest man ! Now he guides us into the wilderness, and shows us the encampment of the french Legions in the desert. The cloudless blue of the sky, scintillating with heat, is softened toward the horizon by smoky vapors, through which mountains are faintly outlined. Over the sandy plains masses of troops march and counter- march, so far away that clash of saber and blare of trumpet do not disturb the profound silence that envelops, as with a mantle, the majestic figure which sion. dominates the scene. Preserving, in spite of mutilation, a marvelous expres of grandeur and repose, the Sphinx rears its massive head, and regards, with a calmness born of absolute knowledge, the vain struggles of a pygmy world. The esser Sphinx, on horseback, himself an incarnation of will and force, mutely demands of the Oracle the secret of his future. In vain. The steady gaze passes over even fis head ; on—on—doubtless beholding the snowy steppes of Russia, reddened with blood and the light of conflagration ; the wounded eagle, trailing his broken wings over the field of Waterloo ; a lonely rock, at whose base he sea makes incessant moan! There is no warning, no sign! Kismet! Again, the wilderness the master loves so well. How like and yet how unlike! Here is the low-lying coast of Africa, with drifts of finest sand blown xy the breath of the £hamsinn into fantastic mounds, from which peep a few scorched and scanty tufts of herbage and the ragged edges of brown, barren rocks. Motionless, as if hewn from the rock on which he sits, a tawny-maned monarch of the esert, with proud, unflinching gaze, steadily regards the dazzling splendor of the setting sun, which is sinking slowly to the horizon, its flaming tints mir- tored in the glassy surface of the Mediterranean. What weird and potent charm GDIPUS THE SPHINX = v) BONAPARTH BEFORE 1886 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 37 is here! What stillness, solitude, vastness! And in the majestic figure of the royal beast what condensed life and power! We are forcibly reminded of a brief but graphic description of the artist himself, from an article by M. de Belina, which appeared lately in a Paris Art publication. “A superb head with mane tossed back, a lion who paints other lions, and one scarcely knows which has the prouder glance, the painter or his model!” What true lover of art does not wish to know more of the artist than can be divined even from creations so eloquent as these? Who would not eagerly seize the opportunity to stand face to face with so rare a personality and grasp the hand whose touch is more potent than that of Midas? Thanks to a generosity only to be met with in truly great natures, the humblest student is always sure of a courteous welcome to the master’s ateliers. A genuine love for art is the ‘‘ Open ! Sesame,” before which the heavy oaken doors that bar the entrance to the forde- cochére of his spacious hotel on the Boulevard de Clichy swing back, revealing a cool, flagged court, with a background of green ivy, which clambers luxuriantly over the high wall at the bottom of the yard. Several fine hunting-dogs lie in the kennels, and spirited horses neigh and stamp in the adjacent stables, for Gérome is a passionate lover of animals, an accomplished horseman and ardent sportsman, who fears neither wind nor weather. “Beau cavalier, chasseur adroit,’ says Claretie of him. 38 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. Glass doors, hung with soft Persian stuffs, lead into the antechamber on the rez-de-chaussée, which is guarded by a bronze horse and cavalier, one of the early works of Frémiet, the great sculptor. The sunlight filters through a stained-glass window and falls with kaleido- scopic effect on Minon, a large Persian cat, who has often served as model to her master, and who, rousing from her siesta on a long, enameled casket, which con- tains a costly narghiléh, lazily opens one eye and blinks an amiable Bonjour. Rare curios from foreign lands are scattered here, as throughout the whole man- sion, with lavish hand, but the attention is instantly caught and fixed by an exquisite figure in the whitest of Carrara marble. It is his wonderful Omphale, which, in the Salon of 1887, was the center of attraction in the garden of the Palais de I’ Industrie. ion—she leans, Pure, pensive, passionate—the perfection of form and expr in the attitude of the Farnese Hercules, upon the club of that vanquished hero, who has succumbed to the power of the tiny God of Love almost hidden under the folds of the famous lion-skin. On the lips of the beautiful Queen of Lydia rests an expression of mingled triumph and longing, as if she were not quite sure of her power to retain her captive lover. Near the windows that front on the Boulevard are Gérome’s two superb grey- hounds, modeled in red clay by himself, in affectionate remembrance of his faith- ful companions now gone to the ‘‘ happy hunting-grounds.” They also frequently posed, and are to be found in several well-known pictures, among others, in 7he Sentinels of the Camp and The Return from the Chase. Hamerton says: ‘‘I would rather have a leash of hounds by Gérome than by any other painter I know.” A massive cobra, with red, shining scales, coils itself into the newel-post of the heavy balustrade which guards the marble staircase. A Salve in blue faience is sunk in the carved woodwork, and the walls of polished marble are covered with priceless Japanese bronzes, masks, and plaques, up to the fourth story, which is reserved by Géréme for his studios and private apartments. Every footfall is deadened by the thick Turkish carpet, and the soft cooing of a dove, that is nestling in the vines which shelter the half-open window on the top landing, seems only to accentuate the stillness in the large atelier, the door of which usually stands ajar. Following hard on the whir of the electric bell comes a cheery “ Entrez a voice which, once heard, is never forgotten. The master stands before an easel, looking inquiringly toward the door; but palette and brushes are instantly laid aside as he recognizes old friends and advances with both hands cordially extended. The salutation is brief, but the intonation dispels at once all fear of LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 39 intrusion, and courteously waved to a seat on the wide divan, ample opportunity is afforded to study fe grand peintre at home. An oval face, crowned with a profusion of fine, snowy hair, brushed well back and up from the noble forehead ; heavy, black eyebrows, overshadowing deep-set brown eyes, whose glance, sometimes clear and piercing, searches the soul, or half veiled by long lashes—warm, dreamy, mysterious—seems to behold things of beauty far beyond all common powers of vision. An aquiline nose, with nostrils slightly curved and dilated, giving him a strikingly valiant air. A sweeping mus- tache, now just touched with gra y, partly conceals the melancholy droop of thin yet ruddy lips, whose almost feminine sensitiven relieved by the firmness of the chin and the superb, antique contour of throat and neck, at once strong and delicate. This admirable head well surmounts an erect military figure, whose every movement, however, betrays a grace doubtless inherent in this tempérament du Midi, the mother of Gérome having been a thoroughly Spanish type. For although the province which proudly claims the master as its own has been part and parcel of France since the time of Louis Quatforze, it was originally settled by the Spaniards and remained for a long time under their dominion. As we chat, a charming model, artistically draped in Oriental robes, comes from the inner atelier where she has been posing, and comfortably bestows herself in a great armchair, one snowy foot, half thrust into a dabouche of red morocco, swinging carelessly to and fro. Unmindful of our undisguised admiration, she falls to examining her taper finger nails, now and then glancing shyly at the clock, as if wishing us away. Finally, weary of following the conversation, she drops into a light slumber, smiling as she dreams, and disclosing a double row of pearly teeth. Walking up and down his spacious ateliers, where he has assembled the richest and rarest accessories of his mé¢ier, the master discourses of his art with an eloquence and ardor which reveal the source of the magic power he exercises over all who come in contact with him. We listen, at once charmed and tantalized, for it is well-nigh as impossible to remember this impromptu lecture,— this marvel of criticism, comparison, and instruction,—as it would be to reproduce the energetic, sparkling, vivid manner of delivery. “ You permit me to smoke?” Answering our hasty gesture of ass ent with a smile, he proceeds to fill his pipe, and, lighting a match, resumes his walk and his talk, till his fingers are burned. With a good-humored “ Peste/’’ he lights another, which goes the way of the preceding one, this time absolutely unheeded, so profoundly is the orator lost in his argument. We wait for a pause—and then, softly, so as not to disturb his train of thought : “But you do not smoke, Monsieur / 40 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, “Ah, no! that is true! It isa habit! I have always smoked more matches than fobacco /”’ The pipe still unlighted, he takes up his discourse in a different vein, keenly satirical but always good-natured, in which one detects not only the man of the world but the philosopher and sage. An acute sense of humor produces often the most contagious gayety, but there is always a strong undercurrent of melan- choly, profound, even somber; intensified in later years by the loss of many of his dearest friends, among others Emile Augier, and the painters Gustave Boulanger and Alexandre Protais, to whom he was deeply attached. A most indefatigable worker, and sought after in society as few men of his epoch have been, Gérdéme still always finds time for his friends, especially such as are sick and suffering. Protais often spoke of his devotion as something unequaled, and surprising in a man who had innumerable claims on his attention and who has sometimes been mistakenly judged to be cold, reserved, and exclusive. In truth, for months before the death of Protais, Géréme, though himself weakened by severe illness, made a daily visit in all kinds of weather, before nine o'clock in the morning, to the quiet apartment where the great military painter was closely confined by an incurable and distressing malady of the heart—cheering the invalid by his sympathy, and diverting him by his ever ready and genial wit. During several of these brief morning calls he succeeded in sketching the patient sufferer, and has thus preserved to the world a striking likeness of the great artist, whose character was ideal in its nobility, integrity, and unflinching self-sacrifice. Of his death, which occurred in February, 1890, Géréme wrote : “Tt has affected me more deeply than I dare avow even to myself.” As is his wont, he seeks solace from this and other irremediable sorrows in unceasing application to his work, putting into it all the force of the emotions that are driven back upon themselves by an irresistible destiny. That time has not needed to alter, but only added new depth and intensity to his noble nature, may be seen from the following pencil-sketch taken in the year 1860 : “Tt suffices [says de Tanouarn] merely to glance at the portrait of Gérome, such as he is represented to-day, to form a sufficiently exact idea of the character of this artist. It is an energetic and vigorous nature, endowed with a marvelous will-power and an indefatigable activity. Géré6me is improvisation and action incarnate. He conceives and executes quickly ; he writes and walks quickly eats quickly, and his comrades in the atelier declare that he sleeps quickly! Here 5 ne is no wastefulness, no lounging, no indulgence nor compromise with idleness. He leads abreast several works at a time, without mingling or confounding anything, like the young Morphy, who plays eight games of chess at a time without making an error. To rest himself, Gérome only changes occupation, passing from one work to the other. AUGURS. THE TWO LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. + Ge “He is not in the habit, however, of ignoring those laws of etiquette or ooliteness, from the observance of which the most exacting society very willingly exempts artists and poets; he never forgets to return a visit nor to reply to a etter, but his painting loses nothing in consequence. He has traveled much, and it has not prevented him from producing much. In a word, it would seem that for 1im the hours multiply and lengthen themselves, while for others they vanish, while they are occupied in reflecting how they will employ them/ . ‘His atelier is situated in Notre Dame des Champs, in a sort of aristocratic live where other painters have lodged themselves. Everything reveals the spirit of order and regularity of the master. One observes a noble and severe simplicity ; some bits of armor, some curiosities brought back from his travels, nut few pictures—yet no ornament foreign to art. It is here that Gérome works, while chatting with his visitors, having his model posed at a great distance, for he is extraordinarily far-sighted. His conversation is animated, inspiring, spirituelle, and gay. He banters good-naturedly without ever wounding. As he is very earned, he touches with ease all topics and seems a § anger to none; he captivates the attention without difficulty and retains it without an effort. “ By the superiority of his mind and the penetrating firmness of his character, Gérome exercises a great influence over the persons who live near to him, He becomes naturally a cenéer, around which less powerful individualities group themselves. He will be, sooner or later, the head of a school, if in the present state of art such a thing is still possible. “In his college days he was the organizer and the soul of all the sports. While with Paul Delaroche, when all the pupils agreed to work together in the evenings Gérome’s little chamber was always chosen as the place of reunion. In 1848, when the pupils of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts had to elect a captain of the staff, their choice fell on Géréme, who acquitted himself of the duties confided to him in true military fashion ; for he delights, and is very skillful, in all bodily exercises above all in hunting. He never fails to pay a yearly visit to his father, and to devote himself to his favorite sport with the activity and enjoy- ment characteristic of him. . . . . Géréme’s reception of any one, although at first a trifle reserved, is of an exquisite kindness ; his manners are admirably distinguished, and he would be a model of a perfect gentleman for Englishmen. His wit is sometimes a little sharp, but his comrades boast of his kindness and generosity, and his readiness for every service he can possibly render, whether obeying the instincts of his heart or following the inspirations of a superior mind, which would deem itself wanting in self-respect in not acting on every occasion with absolute nobility. “Such is the man whose character we have sketched. He is worthy, as one can see, of the artist; there does not exist here one of those distr ing contrasts which are the joy and triumph of vulgar and vicious mediocrity.” This of the man of thirty-six! Twenty-four years later, Claretie writes : “Gérome is sixty years old! One can scarcely believe that he has passed forty! He still retains his intrepid look of an Arnaut. Physically and morally 44 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, he is upright and inflexible—a fascinating type of an artist, chivalric and reso- lute... . . Géré6me remains at sixty what he was at thirty-six; as young, as vigorous, as active, as responsive, vivid, and sympathetic. A charming conver- sationalist, gay, pensive also underneath his exquisite humor, respectful of his art, frank and loyal, adored by his pupils, a professor who teaches the young the rare and oft-neglected virtues—simplicity, study, and unre- mitting labor. In a word, a noble example of a master-painter [jh of the nineteenth century—the soul of an artist with the constitution of a soldier; a heart of gold in a body of iron!” The same precious testimony borne by Masson, whom we have before cited. He says: ““Gérome’s work, already immense, and which his robust health will permit him to augment for a long time,—very diverse in its expression,—is ove, in its sincerity, its continual research, its passion for the truth. This preoccupation is evident in all his representations of antique life, as \ well as in the subjects drawn from the Orient. One of j the few defenders to-day of high art, he has exercised / over modern painting a grand influence. An entire ' school has sprung from his exquisite and spiritual nictures ; an entirely distinct one, without avowing it, from his greater compositions. Gérome has had in our time imitators without number, but he has had a still greater number of pupils, of every shade of opinion and artistic tendency, in whom he has inculcated his passion for nature and for truth. i” “At the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, by the liberality of his mind, the rectitude of his judgment, and the open- ness and breadth of his comprehension, he has rapidly become the best beloved, the most ardently followed, of all the masters. None knows how to estimate better than he, with his infinite goodness and delica a work, to discover its qualities; in short, to evolve an artist. None performs his duties with more of equity and conscientiousness ; none has fewer prejudices or decisions made beforehand; none is better capable of doing justice to his adversaries. The master quality of Géréme is, everywhere and always, sincerity.”’ We can well believe that the loving patience and infinite tact exercised by this honored teacher and head of the greatest School of Art of modern times, is deepened by his ever-present remembrance of the time when he, also, was a student, struggling with the poverty, ill-health, and disappointment which are often the portion of those who consecrate themselves to the service of that most exacting, but most glorious mistress—4r¢/ LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN L NV GEROME, 4. On Hence it is with peculiar interest that we turn back to the beginning of this remarkable career and trace, step by step, the steady advance of the ‘‘infant prodigy of Vesoul.” Jules Claretie, whose knowledge of men and things is as profound as his writing of them is incomparable, justly observes : “That which interests us above all, in the life of illustrious men, is their origin, their début, the first blossoming of their talent. When an artist has covered himself with glory, one writes his biography with the mere titles of his works.” We are fortunate, therefore, in being able to receive our impressions of Gérome's earliest artistic life from himself. We shall, in translating his notes, endeavor to retain, to as great a degree as possible, the picturesque simplicity of this brief but precious autobiography, of which Gérome writes : “Isend you the notes which I promised you, but fear you will not find them interesting. My life has been, above all, a life of work, of incessant labor—con- sequently monotonous for the public! I have had but little to do with the affairs of my time, except in regard to all that pertains to the Fine Arts. It is rather a collection of dates, jotted down years ago, than biographical information that [send you. Has it any value?” In this simple, unaffected, candid record, where years of patient study and toil, physical privation and suffering, disappointment, defeat, and final triumph are disposed of in a single line, we find the same indomitable spirit of persever- ance to which the master owes his present high position, the ardent aspiration which still impels him onward and upward, the courage, conscientiousness, integrity, and modesty which pervade his entire life and work. Mark, too, the sprightly humor with which he recalls his natal day, the 11th of May, 1824: “To prevent seven cities from disputing in the future the honor of my birth- place, I certify that I first saw the light of day in Vesoul, a little, old Spanish city. No miracle took place on the day of my birth, which is quite surprising! The lightning did not even flash in a clear sky! The century was then twenty-four years old. Rome and Sparta had been discarded like tattered and bloodstained garments, and the French people reposed, like a bird, on the elder branch, which, six years later, was to break under it. The Son of Saint Louis was already meditating those famous ordonnances, which were to have so legitimate a success. “T was born of parents without fortune, living by their labor. My father was a goldsmith. He gave me the regular collegiate education—much Latin and considerable Greek, but no modern languages, which I have always regretted, for the little Italian I acquired later has been of enormous service to me in my travels. At the age of sixteen I was Bachelor of Letters. I had had some 40 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. Success in the drawing-class, and my father, who went to Paris every year on business, brought me, as a reward, a box of oil-colors and a picture by Decamps, which I copied fairly well; to the great satisfaction, at least, of the persons who surrounded me, who, let us confe were entirely ignorant of artistic matters |” Gérome has alluded to the downfall of Charles X., whose reactionary policy eventually provoked the revolution of July, an¢ finally culminated in his dethronement. His brief reign was conspicuous not only for political agitation, but for the open revolt in art circles of the romanticists against the iron tradi- tions of the then dominant classicists. A protracted and bitter struggle between the old and new methods resulted in the evolution of the classic-romantic school, of which one of the most noted leaders was Hippolyte (Paul) Delaroche, destined to become the teacher and intimate friend of the young Géréme, who, at the age of ten years, was already making portraits of his comrades and neighbors, whose naive and unqualified admiration fortunate y did not awaken his vanity nor render him less attentive to the instruction of his first professor of drawing —a pupil of David and an artist of considerable talent. “By a happy fortune,” says Gérome, in his notes, ‘a childhood friend of Monsieur Paul Delaroche had just settled in my native city. He induced my father to send me to Paris, where I finally arrived with a letter of introduction to my future teacher (Delaroche). Like a sensible and prudent man, my father ations allowed me to begin my studies in painting, thinking that if his ex were not realized, I was still young enough to embrace another profession. “The trade of a goldsmith,” remarks the painter Timbal, ‘‘is, even in the provinces, closely allied to art. Thence, no doubt, a more willing indulgence of the venturesome inclinations of the budding artist—an indulgence not without merit; for, at this time, painters sold their pictures with difficulty, if they succeeded in selling them at all, and a vocation for art not unreasonably alarmed prudent parents. Let us avow to the praise of the father of Gérome, that he was the first to give pledges to the unknown. In presenting a box of colors to the head scholar in the drawing-class at the College of Vesoul, he was setting fire to powder !” “T entered then the atelier of Delaroche,” continues Gérome, ‘‘where I remained during three years. Rather mediocre studies—shattered health, nervous system greatly irritated ; but, in spite of all, I made efforts and worked my best. My student companions, whom I scarcely ever left, were Daméry, Picou, and Gobert—later on, Hamon also. The first promised well—gained the Prix de Rome while very young, and sent back two very remarkable nude figures ; but he was attacked by a mortal illness that swept him away in the prime of life. The second, with an admirable intellectual and physical organization, a Raphael- LIFE D WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 47 esque temperament, and a truly extraordinary facility of invention and execution, drowned himself, so to speak, in a bath of alcohol; he is now but the shadow of his former self. The two others have fulfilled the promise of their youth.” Commenting on this period, Timbal says : “The atelier of Paul Delaroche at that time held the first place among the schools of instruction. The state patronized none. The master, in all the éclat of his renown, exercised over his pupils an authority which admitted of no dis- cussion. But Gérome had already seriously reflected, and he accepted the yoke without hesitation. Moreover, more than one affinity, and, despite difference in age, a certain similarity of character, quickly established a sympathy between him and his master. Delaroche treated with marked attention this young man with the intelligent, resolute face, this indefatigable and soon skilled worker. There was some merit in distinguishing one’s self in this great battalion— among which shone Daméry, Picou, Jalabert, and Hamon, whose reputation already extended beyond the four walls of the atelier. “In a brief time Géréme became a sort of chief among his comrades, who recognized his unique qualities, and submitted to his influence ; he lived for three years in this circle. But, alas! the atelier is not always the peaceful sanctuary of study. Tranquillity becomes sometimes antipathetic to the age of imagination, in which quality these sixty young people were not lacking. All did not employ it in the same manner. They would work for several hours and all went well, but then came moments of repose, dangerous moments, during which their repressed virits broke through all restraint. Then certain traditions are hard to efface ; n that of hazing (des charges) was still greatly honored, and it furnished occasions for many practical jokes. The inventors found an extreme pleasure in this form of amusement, more so than the st angers passing through the Rue Mazarin or the Quai Conti, with whom they were continually in conflict. Rumors of these disturbances finally reached the ear of the master, who was intensely displeased. zl 1e offenders seemed repentant, promised to do better, and recommenced their pranks the next day. Let those who are without sin throw the first stone at these unruly ones. Unhappily, a sad accident changed into a tragedy the com- edy which had so long fatigued Delaroche, who, indignant at the death of a new pupil (who perhaps fell a victim to the severe annoyances attending his admission), closed his atelier and summarily dismissed innocent and guilty without distinction. During this time Gérome was at Vesoul.” The hapless student here referred to was the subject of a practical joke some- what more elaborate than those usually conceived by the thoughtless but not ill- natured band of mischief-lovers in the atelier. For some pretended offense, he received a mock challenge, which he accepted in good faith, the meeting taking place with all the solemnity that should accompany an affair of life and death ; but he subsequently discovered, while lying ill of a fever that had threatened him for some time, that he had been duped, the pistols having been charged only with 48 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. yowder! In his weak state, he magnified what had been intended only as a harm- ess Alaisanterie into a deliberate and deadly insult, and fell into a violent rage, seriously aggravating his illness, the fatal termination of which was mourned by none more deeply than by his comrades, who had only expected to enjoy a hearty augh together with the victim of their unlucky jesting. Gérome, as we have said, was at this time fortunately on a visit to his parents at Vesoul. He writes: “Tt was in the third year of my studies that, on returning from a vacation, learned of the closing of the atelier and, at the same time, the news that M. Delaroche had placed us—Picou and myself—in the atelier of M. Drélling ; two blows (deux tiles) at a time! I went immediately to find my dear master and told him that, satisfied with his instruction, I should not dream of seeking elsewhere; that I lived well enough at Paris on my ittle annuity and consequently could exist at Rome, whither I desired to follow him!” The truth is that Gér6me had less than a dollar a day to defray a// his expenses—rent, food, fire, clothes, use of atelier, colo canvas, models, ete. He often recurs to these days of privation: ‘‘The happiest of my life. J/a foi / was rich. There were others that had nothing—absolutely nothing! And I have seen days when, if we could scrape together forty sous to dine five of us, we thought ourselves fortunate.” Some of his friends who knew him intimately, at this “happy” time, have testified that his purse was always at the disposal of those who had “nothing,” g; and that the ‘shattered health” of which he speaks was due in great measure to privations, self-imposed, that he might be able to assist his less fortunate comrades. He continues in his recollections : “At the age of eighteen, therefore, I was in Italy. I did not deceive myself in regard to my éfudes d’atelier, which were in truth very weak. I knew nothing, and therefore had everything tolearn. It was already something to be well posted as regarded myself—‘/v@8z ceavrdv’—(know thyself)—a good thing! I did not lose courage ; my weak health improved under the influence of the good climate and life in the open air, and I set to work with ardor; I made studies in architecture, landscape, figures, and animals; in a word, I[ felt that I was waking up by contact with Nature. This year we s one of the happiest and best employed of my life, for at this time I was assuredly making real progress. I watched myself closely in my work, and one day, having made a study rather although it was well done, so much easily, I scraped it entirely from the canv did I fear to slip on the smooth plane of facility. Then already I was, and have remained, very severe toward myself. 1 am my most merciless critic, because I do not delude myself in regard to my work. As to the self-styled critics, their approbation and their raillery have always found me indifferent, for I have LADIATORS HG EEE (SCULPTURE—BRONZE) LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 49 always had the most profound contempt for these vermin, who prey upon the bodies of artists. .... One day Nestor Roqueplan, who was the equal of his confréres, told me that one thing was evident—/ did not show sufficient deference to the critics/ I replied to him, ‘I have talent or I have it oz. If the first is true, you critics may find fault with and demolish my pictures as much as you please; they will defend themselves, and the public will be the judge. In the second case, unmerited praises will not render my works better, and no one will be entrapped by these lying snares. Moreover,’ I added, ‘whatever may be my lot, in the present or in the future, I have firmly resolved never to fay the clague/’ This conversation created a coldness between us.” In a characteristically humorous preface to the essay from which we have already quoted, Bergerat rallies the master good-naturedly on his frankly expressed aversion to critics em masse. “Never believe any one who tells you that Géréme loves art-critics | writes y]|, for he simply execrates them! A writer on art is for him the dried fruit, far excellence, of art or of literature, whichever you please. I confess here that in our first interview he did not mince matters in giving me his opinion on this point, from whence I conclude he is not very proud of the race! It is, nevertheless, rather singular that the artist should owe his precocious celebrity to one of my confréres. It is true the latter possessed, in addition to his critical capacities, an undisputed genius as a poet and novelist, and that he was called 50 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. Théophile Gautier. My relationship to him is certainly the sole cause why I was not received with a volley of stones by the painter of the Combat de Cogs/ And truth compels me even to declare, that, exception once made in my favor, I found myself in the presence of the most charming, sfiritwe/, and learned man that I have ever had the good fortune to meet among the large family of painters. 1 imparted to him the object of my visit, which was to biographize him alive in La Galerie Contemporaine—no more nor less than if it concerned an artist for whom I professed a very sincere admiration, and whom I considered one of the glories of contemporaneous art! He burst into a laugh and went over to his secretary, from a particular drawer in which he took an exceptionally good cigar and offered it to me. ‘I give them only to my friends!’ he remarked, and it was thenceforth understood that he would not treat me as a critic/ His two greyhounds, which till then had held themselves aloof, perhaps only awaiting a sign from their master to reduce me to a state of pulp, now drew near, joyously wagging their tails, and one of them curled himself up to sleep at my feet. “Bless me, yes! there are critics and critics, just as there are /fagots of all qualities. It is clear that an artist of Gérdme's ability, for instance, has a right to consider as both presumptuous and incompetent the bachelor of letters who, without acquired knowledge or previous study, takes it into his head to determine the merits of an art of the very elements of which he is ignorant. It is also evident that the same Géréme might justly feel offended at being called a Miéris, junior, by Burger, ¢f Burger passed for a recognized authority in art matters; for the comparison is unjust to the later master, and betrays both prejudice and partiality in the judge. But, on the whole, if the painter has Théophile Thoré against him, he has Théophile Gautier for him, and to be able to offset the taste of the former by that of the latter, should, it seems to me, afford ample consola- tion. Besides, with all due deference to the master, if the cr/tic did not exist, the ts. sonal harm writers on art are able to inflict is more than compensated for by the artists would be obliged to invent him solely in their own inter he per- service they render to the cause of general instruction. And then, as Figaro would say in regard to the infallibility of a critic, how many painters are there who are qualified to exerc the profession? If we serve only to soften the brotherly judgments of the artists among themselves, and to act as ‘‘mattress” between the different schools, we should still play a useful réle. This is what I was thinking about while watching the blue spirals of smoke from Gérome’s cigar disperse themselves in the atelier. “When I write the folio of which I dream, on the w¢ility of art-critics, it is understood that I shall dedicate it to Géréme! and among the overwhelming proofs which I shall give of this utility—amounting, indeed, to indispensability— is that of having been able, thanks to the institution, to publish this biographical study of the master !” We, who have enjoyed and profited so greatly by Bergerat’s admirable writings, are only too ready to admit that at least criticism such as Ais is LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. on “indispensable,” and to recommend his essays, with their profound learning underlying all the sparkle of fanciful wit, as a model for da critigue, as a profession. We left Gérome in Rome, where he remained one year, working with tremendous energy under the eye of his watchful and sympathetic friend and master, storing his mind with varied knowledge and developing surprising facility, especially in drawing. He would doubtless have been content to pursue these delightful studies in so charming an en/ouwrage, but the parental ambition was scarcely satisfied by the assurance of his general progress, however real. The Prix de Rome oftered by the French Government was, at this time, hotly contested, and naturally attracted the attention of the prudent father, who repeatedly urged his son to enter his name as a competitor for this much coveted prize, which guaranteed to the winner five years’ instruction at the Villa Medici, g J the entire expense of which was borne by the state. In order to comply with the conditions of the competition, it was necessary to be an actual student in some atelier of repute in Paris, and Géréme, obediently yielding to his father’s desire, quitted Delaroche and returned to place himself under the instruction of Gleyre. We have heard it stated that he found the comparison unfavorable to his new master, but, with his usual delicacy, he has refrained from expressing himself on this point. The fact remains, however, that he stayed only three months in his new atelier, and then joyfully rejoined Delaroche, who had returned to Paris, working with him on a celebrated picture now in the museum at Versailles. Géréme refers in his notes very briefly to this period : ‘On my return from Italy I entered the atelier of M. Gleyre. Three months of study—nude figures. 1 then worked for nearly a year at the first draught of a picture which occupied my master (Delaroche) at that time. I refer to the Charlemagne Crossing the Alps. Then, as my father still desired it, | attempted the concours for the Prix de Rome. The sketch was well received, the painted figure 1 It was with ected. Decidedly I needed to draw and model the nude. this intention of s¢wdy that I painted my first picture, /ewnes Grecs Faisant Battre des Cogs. 1 dreaded the Salon, and feared rejection, and it was owing solely to the advice of the Patron that this canvas was sent there. Although badly placed, the picture had a very great success, unquestionably an exaggerated success, which astonished no one so much as the author!” Commending Gérome’s resolution to perfect himself in drawing from the nude, De Tanouarn remarks : “Tn this he acted very wisely, and furnished an example which young painters would do well to imitate. The majority of them hasten to execute pictures before becoming sufficiently versed in drawing. Now drawing is the iS N LEON GLROME. LIFE AND WORKS OF JEA soul of all the plastic arts. Without it, other qualities, however brilliant they may seem, are only a deception, the effect of which will inevitably fade away before long.” Of the young artist's successful début, Timbal writes as follows: “The Salon of 1847 ought to have left some traces in the memory of those whom age condemns to remember it, but how many remain to-day who can recall it? Grande wvi spatium/ Since then many illustrious ones have descended into the tomb or into oblivion, . . . . At that time, one man reigned supreme in the department of criticism. His incomparably skillful pen was a scepter, a dreaded scepter—whose caresses were longed for and whose blows solicited ; neglect alone was feared. Happily, Théophile Gautier was good, and he exercised his power with benignity. . . . . Like an astronomer, he was devoted to his search for stars; under which the his joy was never so great as when, in the mass of canvase chefs-d cuz in discovering some nameless one, some victim unjustly hoisted by the e of the masters in the Louvre were yearly hidden, he succeeded The more obscure the corner, the administration to the height of the friez more openly did the protection of the patron assert itself, and the more ardent was the revolt against the ignorance or the ill will of the judg He then refers to Gautier’s description of Géréme’s first picture, which brought him at one bound into public notice, adding : ‘‘ The great critic was not deceived either in the value of the work or the merit of the artist. The chief of the néo- grecs, ignorant of the onerous title with which he was so soon to be decorated, effort his wonderful naiveté and his already consummate revealed in his fir skill of execution.” De Tanouarn also delightedly praises this first effort, saying: ‘‘ In this sphere (the néo-grec) he showed himself graceful without affectation, simple without barrenne s, and learned without pedantry.” We cannot do better than to transcribe in full Gautier’s criticism, which aroused so universal an attention. “Let us congratulate ourselves that the jury, apparently through inattention, has admitted a charming picture, full of delicacy and originality, by a young man of whom we hear for the first time, and who, if we are not mistaken, has just made his début ; we allude to Les Jeunes Grecs Faisant Battre des Cogs, by M. Gérome. This subject, apparently trivial, has, under his fine and delicate handling of crayon and brush, taken on a rare elegance and exquisite distinction ; it is not, as one might think from the theme chosen by the artist, a canvas of small dimen- sions, as is usual in similar fancies. The figures are life-size, and treated in an entirely historical manner. Great talent and resources have been necessary to raise so episodic a scene to the rank of a noble composition, which no master would disown. Beside the pedestal of an exhausted fountain, where a marble sphinx shows its disfigured profile, surrounded by the luxuriant vegetation of a LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, un on warm country, arbutus, myrtles, and oleanders, whose metallic leaves stand out against the ire of a placid sea, separated from the azure of the heavens by the crest of a promontory—two young people, a youth and maiden, are engaging in combat the courageous birds of Mars. “The young girl leans upon the cage which contains the warlike fowls, in a pose full of grace and elegance. Her beautiful, tapering hands are crossed and charmingly disposed ; one of her arms lightly presses the budding breast, and the bust has that serpentine curve so sought for by the ancients ; the foreshortened limbs are skillfully drawn ; the head—crowned in exquisite taste by a coronet of blond hair, whose fine tones contrast softly with the skin—has a childish deli- cacy, a virginal sweetness ; with lowered eyes and mouth parting in a smile of triumph—for her cock appears to have the advantage—the maiden regards the struggle carelessly, sure that her wager is won. “Nothing can be more beautiful than this figure, whose only covering is a fold of white and yellow drapery, held in place on the sloping contours by a slight purple cord; this grouping of tints, very soft and very harmonious, ad- mirably sets off the warm whiteness of the young Greek’s body. “The youth—whose locks are adorned with a hastily twined wreath of leaves plucked from the neighboring bushes—is kneeling and bending toward his cock, whose courage he endeavors to stimulate. His features, although reminding one perhaps a little too much of ‘the model,’ are drawn with remarkable skill; we of the combat. can see that he is utterly absorbed in watching the ph ‘“As to the fowls, they are real prodigies of drawing, animation, and color ; neither Sneyders, nor Veenincx, nor Oudry, nor Desportes, nor Rousseau, nor any other artists who paint animals, have attained, after twenty years of labor, the perfection M. Géréme exhibits at the start. Black and lustrous, with greenish reflections, the neck bent, its triple collar of feathers bristling up, the eye full of fury, the crest bleeding, the beak open, the claws drawn back to the breast—one of the cocks, ao longer touching the earth, darts forward, presenting to its adversary two stars of threatening claws and formidable spurs—a marvel of pose, drawing, and color. “Not less worthy of admiration is the cock of the coppery, reddish-tinted plumage, which, drawing back close to the ground, lifts its head craftily and extends his beak like a sword, upon which his too fiery opponent may run him- self as on a spit! What is remarkable above all in these fowls is that, besides the most absolute truthfulness, they show a singular elegance and nobility. They are the epic Olympian birds, such as Phidias would have sculptured at the feet of the god Ares, the savage offspring of Here. ‘Children and birds have made of M. Géréme’s picture one of the most charming canvases in the exhibition. What a delicious frieze-panel for the banquet hall of a king or a Rothschild We know already that this picture, which merits every word of eulogy that has been bestowed on it, met with the noblest fate painter or critic could have desired—namely, purchase by the state and a place on the line in the principal 56 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, gallery of the Palais du Luxembourg. Later, Edmond About wrote, ‘‘Greece is the country of simplicity. M. Géréme was ‘Greek’ from the beginning, because he was simple.” And in the midst of all this laudatory criticism of the young débutant, it is interesting, as Bergerat suggests, ‘‘to know, to-day, what Géréme, Membre de l'Institut, and several times the recipient of the Medal of Honor, thinks of this first picture of Géréme, pupil of Delaroche, and refused in the competition for the Prix de Rome/’’ We have only to turn to the notes where he has so candidly recorded his recollections of these early efforts, and we shall see. He writes: “At this period—I speak from a general point of view—there was a complete absence of simplicity. Effect (Ze chic) was in great favor, when accompanied by skill, which was not infrequent. And my picture had the slight merit of being painted by an honest young fellow, who, knowing nothing, had found nothing better to do than to lay hold on Nature, and follow her step by step, without strength perhaps, without grandeur, and certainly with timidity, but with sincerity. Praise was unanimous, which was not always the case in the future. My success encouraged without puffing me up. They gave me a third-class medal. My foot was in the stirrup! I then attempted a more complex compo- sition, in which I had less success. I mean my second picture, Anacreon Dancing with Bacchus and Cupid, which was exhibited the following year, 1848. A dry, cut-up picture, the style and invention of which, however, were not bad. If | had had then the experience I have since acquired, this work might have been a good thing—it remains mediocre. (In the Museum at Toulouse.) I had at the same time sent a Virgin and Child, after the manner of Raphael—insipid and of poor execution. Complete fiasco with these two pictures—it was deserved |” This paragraph attests, without a shadow of question, the genuine imparti- ality of Géroéme’s self-criticism. Having fallen short of his high ideal, he disdains to mention a fact that, to say the least, would have brought consolation to almost any one else save this exacting spirit, namely, that his pictures won a second-class medal,—an advance upon the first year,—and that the government purchased the Anacreon for one of its best collections is only briefly stated in a parenthesis! It is true that the astonishing success of his début was not repeated, but there is a homely old saying that might apply here—‘' lightning rarely strikes twice in the same place.” Still we search in vain for so unsparing and severe a judgment as this merciless critic inflicts upon himself. Timbal writes: ‘The admirers of yesterday were a little anxious; they should have quickly reassured themselves ; it is not given to every one to commit these faults of exaggeration and arrangement through hatred of the commonplace, and not alone by its strangeness did the Anacreon stand out in relief from its neighboring canvases. Doubtless the body and limbs of the flute-player were too rigidly modeled ; MUEZZIN NIGHT) TEs (AT 1882 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. nr NI doubtless the poet, with his immense lyre, formed a somewhat strange silhouette upon the sky, and the little god Bacchus staggered more through the fault of the portraitist than from the effects of intemperance. But what a charm, reminding one of Luini, in the figure of Amowr, and in the least details! what ingenious research and what originality of execution! The eye wanders delightedly over this antique landscape, never seen in the engravings of Poussin, but taken from real Nature’s great garden—with its somber rocks spotted with lichens, its green sward swept by the chill wind from the sea, and its trees, with their delicate branches and fine foliage colored a pale gold by the vanishing sun, trembling in the breeze.” And speaking of the religious picture, Gautier says: ‘‘Géréme, although a pagan of Pompeii, also fully understands Christian art. His St John Embracing the Child Jesus on the Knees of the Virgin might have been signed by Overbeck, only Overbeck would not have displayed this profound science of drawing and this exquisite taste hidden under the Gothic pasticcio. Gérome goes toward Calvary by way of Athens!” Despite Géréme’s feeling that he had failed to achieve a success, the enthu- siasm aroused by his last efforts was undeniable, and his little band of followers, henceforth known as the xéo-grec school, increased in numbers and rallied around him with all the ardor of youth and fervor of artistic zeal. “But the days following victory,” remarks Timbal sagely, ‘‘are often full of dangers; not only do enemies watch for possible faults on the part of the conqueror, but friends even sometimes become more exacting. Gérome was going to experience for some time the instabilities of success, although he seemed only to have to march on in the route he had traced out for himself, and in which others already were following him. The eyes of the public were fixed in expecta- tion on the tiny garden in the Rue de Fleurus, where, in the shade of lilacs anc rose trees, the little colony had pitched its tents and set up its household gods near him they had chosen as their chief.” “They constituted,” says Mrs. Stranahan, ‘‘a kind of apostleship around Gérome of artists of the most delicate conceits, and formed in art a sort of little Athens, in which Théophile Gautier made himself fondly at home. It was a realm, the air of which would not perhaps be sustaining or even perceptible to the respiratory organs of Courbet. Their practice was the opposite of his ; it was to put the common, trivial incident into a graceful rendering, often with a charming poetic sentiment, and by harmonizing contours and evolving grace of line, to give to the nude the classic treatment. They had a predilection for the nude. Their treatment differs from the academic classic, in taking the common incident, the familiar and emotional side of Greek or Roman life—in fact, in painting the genre of the antique, or, a more pleasing if less substantial depart- ment of their practice, the genre of fancy—as in the works of Hamon and LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. Aubert. They also treated subjects of modern life, but it was by foetizing them into the classic, rather than by agegrandizing them into it, as had been the practice of the Davidians. The influence of this school is in some de perceptible in most of the later French artists.” t was in a simple little wooden cottage that these happy poet-artists gathered around their beloved leader, who, as Hamon wrote, ‘‘inspired one with a love of work, but work done laughing and singing!” 3ut there came, as we have heard from Géréme’s own lips, day discouragement and trial, and, in truth, of real suffering and pinching want. The revolution of 1848,—in which he figured prominently as captain on the staff I of the National Guard,—although comparatively pacific, seriously affected the already precarious existence of the struggling band, some of whom were practically without resources. There was no demand nor market for paintings, and Géréme’s generosity soon brought him to the common condition, ‘‘ empty pockets.” Many were the curious shifts they made during the next year to keep 1e ‘‘wolf from the door”; such as painting tiny religious cards representing the ‘Way of the Cross,’ and drawing lots to see who should place themselves on the steps of the different churches, in the hope of gaining the price of a meal by selling these incentives to devotion to the faithful, as they passed in and out of the sanctuary. But in spite of empty stomachs and chilled fingers, which were often warmed only over a blaze made of a stray newspaper captured as a wintry wind blew it along the boulevard, the work went on, and the “laughing and singing” did not diminish, though an attentive ear might have detected an undertone of pathos and patient resignation. Gérdme, as usual, does not dwell on these days of hardship, stoically endured; pride and consideration for his parents prevented him from confessing his needy condition till a dangerous attack of typhoid fever almost put an end to his career. His dear mother hastened to Paris, and, after weeks of devoted nursing, carried him away to Italy, where they remained for three months, visiting Genoa, Milan, and Venice before returning. Gér6me again takes up his recollections. ‘‘After this I exhibited almost every year, but I had lost ground, and several works placed before the public left it cold and indifferent. One of them, under the title of Gynécée, aroused con- siderable attention, but more on account of the subject (sad! sad!) than of the manner in which it was treated.” Although, as Bergerat says, ‘‘it somewhat shocked the bourgeois and philis- tine foll, who seemed to demand that the artist should regard these beautiful forms and graceful postures from their severely moralistic point of view,” it can- not be denied that the subject is portrayed with the soberness characteristic of this painter, who reproduces the actual life of ancient Greece not only in his LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 59 themes, but in his modes y of pose and delicacy of treatment. Aside from the masterly modeling of the different figures, which are standing or languidly & reclining on couches covered with tiger-skins, what delightful grouping of details we find here! Vines clambering upward toward the sun over polished marble pillars ; a solemn old stork standing on one leg and gravely regarding some black and white ducks who paddle to and fro in a pool of clear water; vases, lamps, and amphore of exquisite shape ; delicate frescoes and tiling; graceful draper luscious fruits heaped temptingly in a flat bowl with curved handles, and burning incense mingling its intoxicating perfume with the faint odor of the flowers that have dropped from the hand of the sleeping beauty, who lies upon a superb lion- skin which is thrown on the tessellated floor ! Of this canvas, which also bears the title /tériewr Grec, Gautier declares, *‘ It is the only picture which can be placed beside the Sfra/onice of Ingres. Itisa chef-d'euvre of style, grace, and originality.” No reproduction exists of two additional paintings exhibited this same year (1850)—Souvenir d’talie and Bacchus et ! Amour Fores ; but the latter—of which Réné Ménard writes, ‘‘Every one will remember what a sensation was produced by this charming picture”—was singled out by the government and bought for the Museum at Bordeaux. The years 1851-1852 were busily employed executing a state commission, con- cerning which the artist writes as follows : “Tt was toward this period that I finished a Chapel (St. Sévérin), which doubtless has some merit, but which betrays the youth and inexperience of the artist. On one side the Communion of St. Jéréme, on the other Belzunce Making a Vow to the Sacred Heart during the plague at Marseilles. One or two characters in the first picture are well done, among others the St. Jérome; the general character is quite exalted, and the treatment does not lack boldness; but every- where there is dryness and even hardness. This is a defect which I have always sought to correct in myself, and if I have succeeded in diminishing it, I have not yet been able to rid myself of it entirely. In the other picture, several characters are well conceived, among others the young woman showing her dead child to Belzunce. The scene is well composed, the subject clearly expressed— that is all I can say of it!” Who among competent professional critics will fail to appreciate the sterling worth of criticism like this, or the rare strength of character that renders it possible ? Masson characterizes these mural decorations as ‘“‘two noble compositions of an elevated character and a true inspiration. If certain portions seem a little dry, nothing is ordinary. In fact, this is a distinguishing feature in the work of Gérome—that it never falls into, nor touches ever so slightly, the commonplace.” 60 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. M. de Tanouarn also describes the same work as ‘‘an admirable composition, endowed with all the qualities which religious painting can have in our day.” In point of mural decorations, Géréme was afterward called upon to adorn the Bibliotheque des Arts-et-Métiers , Which was the ancient refectory of Sa¢nt-Martin- des-Champs, and several years later for some / = ps = panels in the Pompeian Palace of Prince { — <== Napoleon, of which we shall make further I mention. The Salon of 1852 also held a picturesque landscape entitled Vue de Pestum. The broth- ers Goncourt devoted quite a space in one of their admirable critigues to this charming bit of Nature, where “the whole scene exhaled a delicious freshness.” They especially admired “the heavy heads, the woolly tufts, the solidity of the joints, and the varied movement of the buffaloes, hastening, rushing down to the water to quench their thirst.” Gérome’s notes now briefly record the exposition at the Salon of 1853 of a frieze destined to be reproduced on a ‘‘vase, com- memorative of the Universal Exposition at London, ordered by the Minister of State from the government manufactory at Sévres.” The figures on this superb vase, which was pre- sented by the French Government to Queen Victoria, were life-size, and gave the artist a rare opportunity to exhibit his versatile powers. Says Masson : ‘Never perhaps more than here has the painter given proof of his inventive genius, in the grouping of personages, in the research for symbols of each nation, in the pursuit of characteristic types of the human races. The composition is ingenious and simple. With a subject that too easily lends itself to the common- place, the author has drawn a lofty poem of Unive rsal Industry, for which each nation furnishes a strophe. Antique costumes, learnedly studied, freshened by ingenious details, ennoble the modern accessories. It is a kind of ethnographic résumé, which it is interesting to compare with the tapestries of the eighteenth century which represent the Four Quarters of the Globe.” Gérome has also executed life-si figures of different nations for a model lighthouse, in an equally masterly manner. He also sent to the same Salon a Study of a Dog and /dylle, a fantasy in his much-loved classic style—a youth and 14ND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 61 maiden leaning against a fountain where a graceful fawn comes confidingly to drink. It is a most poetic conception, expressive of pure, artless love and the happy ¢souciance of ‘‘ Life in Arcadia.” We now come to the first of those journeys which had so decided an influence over the subsequent work of the artist, and of which he briefly speaks as follows : “Tn 1854 I started for Moscow with my friend Got. On the way we changed our minds, turned back, and took the route to Constantinople by way of the Danube and the Black Sea, a voyage of tourists, not worker He could scarcely have chosen his compagnon de voyage better. M. Got, the celebrated actor of the Comédie-Frangaise, was a man not only skilled in his own profession but of remarkable learning and a genial wit. Unfortunately war broke out and prevented our travelers from gaining the interior. Obliged to retrace their steps, they took passage on a huge flatboat, which drifted lazily down the Danube, touching here and there to discharge or increase its cargo. Of this journey Timbal writes : “One day,as the boat stopped for this purpose, Géréme and his friend went on shore for a stroll; chance led them near a group dimly outlined through the morning mists. It was a band of musicians belonging to the Russian army, who were singing a battle-march. Géréme approached, leisurely regarded them, took his sketches and his notes, and the Cossacks did not concern themselves about him. More prudence is exercised on other frontiers,and any other unfriendly nation would perhaps have made a hostage of the audacious painter, or, more probably, a spy and a victim. This is how it happened that, starting for the Ukraine to sketch the descendants of the vassals of ancient Rome, Gérome met there the actors in a little page of contemporaneous history, whose modest figures were destined almost to eclipse those of Virgil and of Brutus, but who opened up to him who knew how to see and to portray them a new vein of success; it is far from being exhausted, and it is by this carefully renewed and cultivated power of recognizing the picturesque element, and the striking physiognomy of foreign races, that the painter still achieves to-day one of his most incontestable triumphs.” This was only one of the many sketches with which our artist filled his port- folios before taking the steamer at Constantinople to return by way of Malta to aris, where he attacked with renewed ardor the great historical picture which, as we have seen, excited the profound admiration not only of the more serious artists, but of the most distinguished poets, historians, and littérateurs of that period. But it was “‘caviare to the general,” and the disappointment of the artist at seeing his pictures of genre preferred to his greater work is easily understood. He writes : ‘‘This same year I had received an order for a large picture—7%e Age of Augustus, Birth of Christ. This canv. as, which cost me two years of work and enormous efforts (it measured ten meters in length by seven in height), only 62 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. obtained a succés d’estime, which was perhaps unjust. However, I must admit at once that the picture had one glaring defect—it lacked invention and originality, recalling by the disposition of the figures, and unhappily by this point only, the Ipotheosis of Homer, by Ingres. This grave fault once acknowledged, it is just to admit that in this vast composition there are figures well conceived,—mofi/s of groups happily combined (such as Brutus and Cassius, Cleopatra and Antony),— arrangements of costumes and draperies in good style; in short, a quantity of fancies, crowned in some instances with success, with which perhaps the public should have accredited me ; it has not done so.” Here again we see Géréme, with his severely critical eye, detecting and magnifying his weak points, utterly underestimating the impr on made by this remarkable picture, which, adds Gautier to his exhaustive crétigue, already quoted, ‘‘will be forever remembered as one of the beauties of the Exposition.” “At the same time,” continues Géréme, ‘‘appeared a small picture repre- senting The Band of a Russian Regiment. 1 had, it seemed, found /a@ note on which I had sensible, for it was much more remarked than my large work a greater right to count. This year I received the decoration of the Legion of Honor.” And another medal, he might have added, but that his mention of laurels received is rare and always brief, since they never have impressed him as deeply as his failures to attain to his highest ideals. It was no consolation to him to see visitors to the Salon jostling each other in an effort to gain a place in the crowd that always stood before his other pictures, notably the Recreation in Camp. In a private letter to a friend at this time, Gérome writes: ‘‘I send you the picture of the Russians, which I took to M. de Nieuwerkerke a few days ago. He has allowed me to hope that he will make every effort to have it hung on the sacred walls/ Asitis not large, try to place it well for me, if it is still allowed to come in. I do not know what title to give it. I think it would be best to simply call it Russian Recreation in Camp—Souvenir of Moldavia, 1854. It really 1as no need of a title, for it is sufficiently plain, and, even if it is placed, it cannot appear in the catalogue.” The artist need not have feared for the fate of this little gem, which was gladly accepted by the administration, many weeks after the opening of the exposition, achieving an instant and universal success. Gautier writes of it as follows : “Let us speak now of a picture which does not appear on the catalogue because it was not finished till long after the opening of the Exposition. As it is difficult to find, we are sure of rendering service to amateurs by informing them that it is placed in the first gallery, among the exhibits from Portugal. It LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GERO! 63 is a study from nature made during a journey in Moldavia in 1854, when the artist had the good fortune to be in close proximity to a Russian camp ; actuality, as one will quickly notice, is not wanting in this scene. “Some Russian soldiers, dressed in cafofes of gray drugget, resembling the frock of a monk or a hospital great-coat, and wearing blue helmets bordered with red, are ranged in a circle; they have been ordered to amuse themselves and they are conscientiously obeying the command; one of them has advanced to the center of the circle and is executing a kind of awkward Muscovite cachucha, accompanying himself on two triangles garnished with strings on which quiver little copper coins which he rattles together; the orchestra is composed of a violin, a drum, and a fife; those who have no instruments sing, or, inserting two fingers into their mouths, produce a shrill whistling ; some of them, between the strophes of this rondo, take a whiff from their short pipes. Nothing is more curious than these Kalmuck and Tartar types, with their flat noses, projecting cheek-bones, and shaved heads, their Albino-like mustaches, and little eyes under eyelids sloping toward the temples; the countenances of these poor devils are resigned, nostalgic, and very gentle in spite of their ugliness; the young fifer is almost good-looking, and on the field of battle he would blow into his little reed pipe with the same stolidity as did the fifer so much admired by Frederick the Great. “At a little distance an under-officer mounts guard, holding in his arm, bent behind his back, a whip, to stimulate the mirth! Farther off a second circle is absorbed in the same diversion. Tents of white canvas, a gray hill where seven or eight windmills are turning their fans, looking like huge wheels, a hazy sky on which a sharp line is traced by a flock of cranes, the flat banks of the Danube, where a melancholy sentinel is gazing into the turbid current—all this forms a most original background for this strange circle. It is impossible to describe the profound sadness of this scene, placed in these somber surroundings, dimly lighted, and as if veiled with ennui. The execution has a precision and finish that does not exclude breadth, the secret of which M. Gérome possesses. One learns more of Russia in looking at this little canvas for a quarter of an hour than by reading twenty descriptive volumes; painting, with its mute language, g, often says more than the wordiest writers.” Without exception, the critics lavished praise on this unique and exquisitely painted scene, where, as Edmond About says, ‘‘each fold of drapery might have been signed by Meissonier.” In addition to these two canvases, each so extraordinary in its own sphere, Gérome exhibited three bits of genre: 4 /Vock-tender, An Italian Lad Playing on a Samponia, and the pendant, 4x /talian Girl Playing on a Mandoline, which Gautier pronounced ‘‘very finished and very precious, strikingly displaying the delicate perfection of the artist’s skill.” “At the end of this Exposition,” writes Bergerat, ‘‘a little saddened by the injustice of the public toward his important effort in Ze grand art, Gérome started 64 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. for Egypt. Was he not predestined to paint the Orient, this man whose first child’s attempt had been to copy a picture by Decamps?” And Timbal adds, “He went to seek the promised land, the country of those poets, choristers of the sun, who were called Marilhat and Decamps. Did he not show some temerity in choosing their route? What was the newcomer going to do? Copy his pre- decessors or contradict them? Géréme did not embarrass himself in advance with troublesome questionings. What he was going to see he would relate in his own way. Comparisons weighed but little on him. A single desire possessed him—to copy faithfully the scenes the Orient was about to place before his eyes. In finding again on the shores of the Nile the souvenir of that second vocation of which he had caught a glimpse one day on the banks of the Danube, he fixed a certain horizon and determined upon a precise goal which for some time had seemed to flee before him.” In truth, in Géréme’s recollections there sounds at this moment a joyous note of relief, hope, and eager expectation: a view-halloo of the unequaled success that was to crown his efforts in this line : “Departure for Egypt. My short stay in Constantinople had whetted my appetite, and the Orient was the most frequent of my dreams. Probably some Bohemian slipped in among my ancestors, for I have always had a nomadic dis- position and a well-developed bump of locomotion. I started with friends, being one of five—all of us with little money but abundant spirits! However, living at that time was very cheap in Egypt. The country had not yet been invaded by the Europeans, and one could live ther at a very moderate expense. We rented a sailboat and stayed for four months on the Nile, hunting, painting, and fishing, from Damietta to Phila. .... We returned to Cairo, where we passed four months more in a house in old Cairo, which Suleiman Pasha rented to us. In our quality of Frenchmen he showed us the most cordial hospitality. Happy time of youth, thoughtlessness, and hope! The sky was blue!.... Many pictures, more or less successful, more or less to the taste of the public, were executed as a result of this sojourn by the banks of the Father of Waters.” With these few lines, the artist lightly disposes of that unprecedented col- ection of paintings which he sent to the Salon of 1857, and which at once estab- ished his claim to the title of foremost Orientalist of the age—a claim since confirmed beyond all question. The amount of work he accomplished within a few months is almost incredible, and its variety and quality astonished alike connoisseurs and the general public. Timbal writes: ‘‘It is ancient Egypt, whose sand each year devours its precious remains, and also Egypt struggling a new birth, where the painter seems to show us the steady fatality which keeps an accursed race under the double yoke of slavery and suffering. He gives to these revelations of a country LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 65 already well-known, a new physiognomy, and to his pictures the indisputable authority of a document of which history will one day invoke the testimony. And art can demand nothing more from these scenes, so proudly faithful in their simplicity of effect and execution, which repose eyes weary of conventionalities become éana/es, and which are none the less skillful because they do not pretend to add light to the sun, nor to lend brilliancy to the rags of the fed/ah.”’ Let us follow Gautier as he passes from one to the other of these wonderful canvases, reproducing with facile pencil, for those who cannot see the originals, their unique beauty, ai pathos, and power, of which he has already given us some foreshadowing in his re- view of the atelier sketches. “One is apt to picture to one’s self tropical countries as glowing and flaming with é heat; this is true some- times but not always. The intense light pouring , down in white floods changes the color of sky, earth, and ~“ buildings. The sand, on fire, assumes under a leaden sun the cold appearance of snow- drifts; while the impalpable dust raised on the horizon forms a kind of mist which chills and extinguishes the warm tones of color. Therefore the absolute truthfulness of the Agyptian Recruits Crossing the Desert is more astonishing than convincing to the general eye. One thinks, in spite of one’s self, of the deserts of the opera, with their skies streaked with indigo and mine de Saturne, and their inevitable clump of palm trees. Here, there is nothing of the kind; sand as white as powdered freestone, blown into rippling waves by the wind, betraying the passage of caravans by large footprints, or rising in opaque whirlwinds; a sky veiled by a dusty fog and burning with the rays of a sun blazing at a white heat; before, behind, to the right and to the left, above and below, an absolute barrenness—dull, pallid, dry, over- whelmed and overwhelming ; Bo the only breath that stirs, the suffocating shamsinn. The Egyptian recruits the only drops that fall being drops of sweat traverse this charming site in charge of several Arnauts. One can wel conceive that, in order to force them to start, it was necessary to cudge them soundly, and fasten them, two by two, like galley-slaves, in their wooden stocks. At the head of this melancholy cortége strides an Arnaut, his gun thrown across his shoulders and under his arms, lik of Atta-Troll, hold between their paw the wands the bears, confréres he marches with a calm, insolent, anc cruel air, in his beautiful costume whitened with dust. The sufferings of the miserable wretches who follow him with heavy step, hindered by their shackles, do not move him in the slightest degree. He has for human life the quiet, fatalistic disdain of the Orient. Several soldiers guard the column which faces 66 LIFE AND WORKS OF /. IN GEROME. the spectator. The first row is composed of fellahs, Copts, and negroes, clad in blue shirts, in brown mach’lahs or white burnous, more or less tattered ; some are barefooted, others drag along in fragments of savafes. A gloomy despair can be read in their stupefied countenances, and they march with the som- nolent pace of overdriven beasts of burden whom the lash has ceased to sting ; the fetters on their wrists prevent them from even wiping their foreheads. The second file, already less distinct, appears in the gaps between the’ heads, and the rest of the column stretches out like a flock of shadows through an ever-thickening cloud of dust. M. Bida has treated the same subject in a drawing which will not fail to impress European travelers. But he has chosen the moment of departure, where the scenes of farewell have furnished pathetic effects. In the picture by M. Gérome, the victims, caught as in a vise between the impassibility of nature and the imps sibility of despotism, have not even tears left to shed.” With a sigh and a shudder, we move on beside the great critic and pause before the Memnon and Sesostris. “Two mountains sculptured in the form of man—which neither time, nor tremblings of the earth, nor conquerors much more terrible, have been able to move from their base! They are there, their colossal hands crushing their knees, shapeless, monstrous, flat-nosed, returning slowly to rock, standing out against the arid background of the Lybian range which lies barren beneath a scorching sun—rosy in the light, blue in the shadow. emmnon has lost his voice, and, since the Roman Emperor essayed his restoration, no longer salutes Aurora. The inscriptions on the pedestal seem to-c y untrue, but the phenomenon of his melodi- ous vibration is established by history in the most incontrovertible manner. At the foot of these gigantic statues, a group of men and camels may serve as a scale of comparison ; they scarcely attain the height of the base-plate. To relieve this landscape of limestone and granite, M. Géréme has placed in the foreground several clumps of green herbs, which the summer will soon change into tawny tufts resembling a lion’s mane. Some camels are squatting on the grass unsaddled, chewing, or stretching their necks over the turf. In the center of the picture, a large camel, with one fore-leg bent in a shackle, seems to resist the efforts of his driver to make him kneel beside a more peaceful comrade. The stubborn animal raises its head, shows its gums, and is doubtless making the kind of grunting noise which is the mode of complaint peculiar to the camel. The accessories, the saddles, cushions, carpets, sticks, and bits of stuffs are treated with a consci- entious precision that reveals the use of each object. In the background, an Arab, mounted on a mahari, is scudding away at a great pace; nothing can be more odd than this ambling gait and these long legs agitating themselves in space, like those of an immense field-spider. M. Gérome, during his travels in Egypt, has made a special study of the queer profiles presented in repose and in action by the strange animal to whom the Arabs have given the name of ‘ship of the desert’; he is thoroughly master of it and can reproduce all its attitudes. LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 67 “The Plain of Thebes is the reverse side of the picture we have just de- scribed. The foreground consists of fragments of enormous columns, in scattered locks, on one of which is carved the image of a god; it is the débris of a ruined yalace, probably that of Amenophis; beyond the ruins stretches a plain subject to inundations, crossed by a road along which a caravan of dromedaries is passing, followed by a little donkey carrying its rider on the croup after the Arabic fashion. The two colossi, with great difficulty diminished by the distance, reappear, seen from the back, their royal tresses gathered and knotted behind their heads like a guewe a la prussienne. Farther on, the eye discovers blackish ands, besprinkled with trees and palms, and to the right hillocks, or rather mounds formed of ruins, fragments of which stick up through the ground. In the background a chain of distant mountains, rosy and purple; over them a sky misty with heat, which seems to lie far above and behind the shimmering, uminous atmosphere, and on which a flock of wandering storks make micro- scopic points. “We describe in detail, as if we were on the very spot, these strange land- Scapes, so new to Parisian ideas that any one but a traveler would be tempted to believe them false—precisely because the repr sentation is so absolutely true. But what can we do? The environs of Thebes do not resemble the outskirts of Paris! We must make up our minds to be content with this bar enness— grand, solemn, and mournful. On the frame the sacred wréeus spreads its wings, and the hieroglyphic characters, most familiar to travelers, succeed in giving to the whole an absolutely Egyptian appearance.” Beside these more important pictures hung a simple everyday scene, the accuracy of which all travelers in the desert lands of the East will attest. The critic of the London Atheneum especially recommended to English artists close study describes in his graphic way this picture of Camels Drinking Srom the of the “superb execution and firm, deliberate drawing.” Gautier also Fountain of the Crocodile, which takes its name from the sculptured figure over the basin: Before a stone trough fed by the clay pots of a sassaghieh, a group of camels, one of which carries his driver, extend their ostrich-like necks and plunge their hairy lips into the water, drinking for the thirst to come. They are of all kinds and colors, and M. Géréme has been able to indulge himself to his heart’s content. It would be difficult to render more perfectly the hairy skin, the physiognomy, and the character of this animal. Only the desire to reproduce everything has ration of minutize; certain portions are rather perhaps led the artist to elabo sculptured than painted, and the covering of the muscles is in some parts meager. But how greatly we prefer this Doum palms, with their fans of pointed leaves, the side of a wall, and a bit of sky fill the background in a characteristic manner. This picture offers nothing dramatic, but which represents a scene of patriarchal life with a truth on which the most suspicious can rely—pleases and interests us greatly. everity to the slovenly vagueness of many artists. whose subject 68 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, We are not of those who desire that art should have a purpose outside of itself; but, without being utilitarian the least in the world, we think that painting is of use, when, remaining within the conditions of beauty, it acquaints us with the types, customs, aspects, and usages of distant countries; and that is why we laud M. Géréme for having quitted for the moment mythology and history, to take us with him on his travels.” But Géréme is not of those who quickly and easily forsake ‘‘the old love for the new,” and he adds to his collection a dainty bit of real life more familiar to the average traveler, from the land that claimed his early artistic affections. “At the corner of a street in Rome, some f/ifferari are standing before a Madonna, sheltered in a little chapel erected on a fragment of an antique column with a Corinthian capital ; from a crossbeam of iron fastened to the wall hangs lamp about the height of the sacred image. According to the Italian custom the piferari are serenading the Holy Virgin and the Divine Child. One of them, a -s under his arm the youngest, is playing on a species of fife; the other press the leather bag of the cornemuse, inflated with wind, and devotes himself to his untutored fingering of the long pipes. One knows, even at Paris, the picturesque atters of these strolling musicians, so beloved of artists, and who, for the most part, come from the Abruzzes. Their sharp and nasal chanting is not without charm, above all when heard from a little distance. This time M. Gérome has chosen microscopic proportions and his picture could be placed on the golden plate of Meissonier. It is a tiny chef d’euvre of finish, delicacy, and precision. Place upon a perfect photographic proof a vivid, clear, charming color, and add the sty/e,—which is the very soul of the artist and which no instrument can give,—and you will have the Piferari of M. Géréme, a miniature which pos- sesi xrandeur.” Leaving these strange, exotic scenes of the distant East, and this typical Southern group, we find ourselves on the edge of a silent crowd whose faces, expressing varied emotions, are eagerly turned toward another canvas bearing the same signature. Says De Tanouarn: ‘‘The artist has resolved in this work a delicate problem—he has pleased the ‘crowd’ without degrading art; he has approached them like those grands seignewrs who make themselves accessible without losing any of the dignity of their rank.” He was speaking of the world- renowned Duel after the Masquerade, the original of which is in the magnificent collection of the Duc dAumale at Chantilly, and a replica in the wonderful gal- leries of one of our most cultivated and liberal American connoisseurs, Mr. W. T. Walters of Baltimore. It will be interesting to note how this picture affected two nations so different in their ‘‘ point of view” as the French and English. To this end we quote two quite lengthy reviews; the first by Gautier, the second from the London Atheneum of January, 18 ATIN AHI NO WANOSING AHL ) AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 71 “One is always sure [says Gautier] of finding a large crowd stationed before the Duel by M. Géréme. It is the popular success of the Salon; and, as the picture is not large, one must always await one’s turn to see it, This vogue, let us hasten to say, is not due to any method that art would disapprove. Nourished by the severest studies, and endowed naturally with an exceptionally pure taste, the young master would scorn a triumph gained at such a price. The singularity of the subject attracts the public, the merit of the execution retains the con- noisseur. It would be almost trite to say that the forms and costumes of modern life lend but little to painting. Artists appear more convinced than any one else of this truth, and they willingly borrow from ancient times the subjects of their compositions. It is only in the last extremity, as in the portrait, for instance, that they resign themselves to the actual fashions; and even then they alter them as much as possible by the introduction of mantles, durnous, shawls, scarfs, and other accessories having some special character. Even in genre they stop at the last century, where one seeks the picturesque in the Pyrenees, in Brittany, in Aragon, in Algeria. The number of canvases that could serve as documents in future ages, as to our interiors, our furniture, our costumes, our types, our mode of life, is excessively limited ; and, unhappily, almost always of mediocre execu- tion. It seems that the art of to-day is affected by farsightedness, and can only discern objects belonging to remote and bygone ages; it sees nothing around about itself. Aside from several portraits and official pictures, few of the canvases mark the present period. We must, therefore, thank M. Gérome, the painter of Grecian elegance, the Pompeian archzeologist, the expert in exotic or primitive types, for having taken a bare subject from our customs; he risks much in handling a reality of which every one is, or thinks he isa judge, in sub- jecting new matter, new physiognomies, and new attire to the requirements of art. What would have happened had he depicted a duel fought in black coats? “The idea of the Duel after the Masquerade is ingenious, thrilling, dramatic ; it impresses at the same time the mind and the eye, by the antithesis of the action and the actors—terrible action, grotesque actors, a duel of pierrots and harlequins elevated to a tragic height, without avoiding a single comic detail, Some young people, doubtless overheated with wine, have begun a dispute on the steps of the opera, or in some cabinet in the Maison d’Or, on account of a push with an elbow, a too cutting sarcasm, a slight fit of salousy, or for any other trifling reason. One of those busybodies who are always ready to show courage with the blood of others, has brought swords, and the whole company, without taking time for a change of costume, has gone out in two iages to the Bois de Bou- upon the morning mist, through which skeletons of slender trees are dimly seen. The snow covers the logne; the gray dawn scarce opens its heavy ej earth with a white winding-sheet, stretched out during the night as if to receive the dead. Cold, solitude, and silence have kept watch around about, that not hing should disturb the combatants ; and indeed, they have succeeded only too well in their unlucky affair. Footmarks in the snow show the place of the struggle ; one of the antagonists, the pierrot, has been wounded and could say with Mercutio, making a funereal pun, ‘Ask for me to-morrow and you shall find me a grave 0 LIFE AND LEON GEROME. N WORKS OF JEAN man!’ The blood spreads its red stain over the cassock with the big buttons; the limbs, from which the life is departing, and over which the will no longer asserts its power, lie inert on the snow, and, under the loose garments, seem already stretched out inashroud. Were it not for the friend, disguised as a valet of the s him, he would fall prostrate. The pallor of 1e paint which has been partly wiped from the face of poor Comédie-Francaise, wh oO supp. death shows through t Pierrot ; the dull eye already stares into vacancy, and on the drawn lips his expiring sigh leaves a rosy foam. “The sleeve of the right arm, turned up above the elbow for the combat, flesh and weak muscles of the young debauchee, who still holds beneath his contracted fingers the sword that has exposes the quivering so poorly defended its sd in the costume of a Chinese mandarin, red and master. Another person, dre green, oddly beflowered in fantastic design, throws himself upon his knees and A little in omino is lifting his hands with a gesture examines with terrible anxiety the bloodstained breast of the victim. the rear of this group, a man in a black « of despair, as if to tear his hair at the de “ Another plorable result of a silly quarrel. group, at quite a distance from the first, is composed of the murderer and his second, who are hurrying away a harlequin and a Mohican. Harlequin, to prepare for the fight, had thrown on the snow his black mask and his paletot; his sword, stained with blood, lies on the ground, and these sig- ificant accessories skillfully connect the two parts of the composition ; the har- lequin seems to be feverishly telling the savage, whose arm he clutches, that his yponent did not parry, that he absolutely ran himself through with the sword, the inevitable fatality ; the other bends s if to reply, ‘What is to be done about it?’ nd other explanations, too late to avoid In the background the carriage of he wounded man assumes in the fog the melancholy look of a hearse, with its inky silhouette, and the drivers, who are whispering together, seem like under- takers. “Surely this is oc strange philosophical d the wooden saber of H wine into bloodstains, to surround the death agony with a circle of mas demand of Harlequin, d and sinister, of a wild and romantic fancy and a aring! To mix up the Carnival and Death, to change arlequin into a real sword; to transform the spots of to All ‘What hast thou done with thy brother Pierrot? this would make the n intrepid hesitate. M. Géréme has performed this difficult, not to say impossible task with an icy severity, a pitiless sang-froid, are g5 an irony superior to fate. He has forgotten nothing; neither the ruddy hole melted in the snow by a drop of warm blood, nor the spangles which on the lozenge-trimmed coat of the murderer, nor the bear’s-claw collar of the Indian, nor the formless and datiered mask, nor the paint on the face of the dying man dissolved by the cold death-sweat. sparkle “ All this is rendered with a clean, firm, delicate, assured touch which keeps always within a perfect contour, and a color that is sober, neutral, wiztry,so to speak, created by the livid, shuddering pallor in the midst of which the clear, vivid tones of the costumes produce a sinister discordance. The face of Pierrot, who is sobered by the approach of Death, and from the dizzy whirl of the IFY RREIO DAN CH THE 1883 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 73 masked ball passes to the silence of the tomb, is a creation of powerful origin- ality; no grimace, no melodrama, no straining after effect. There is something in it as dry, exact, and strong asa page of Mérimée. The impression produced is the more profound in that the narrator appears indifferent. M. Gérome, like a careful artist, does not leave to the fancy of the gilder the form and ornamenta- tion of his frames. He has himself designed, for the top of this one, two masks, tragic and comic, separated by a fool’s bauble. Does not Folly dance between Joy and Sorrow, causing one to be born of the other?” One might think this master-page of description hard to equal, yet the critic of the Atheneum admirably holds his own. He says: “The Duel after the Masquerade, of M. Gérome, appeared at the fag end of the last French Exhibition, but too late to receive the universal admiration due to its great merits, and too late to obtain from us more than a line of notice. The scene is the Bois de Boulogne—time daybreak ; the sky lurid with a dull, yellow, curdling fog. The duel has just taken place. The one who is pricked to the heart is a pierrot—one of those Scaramouch clowns that the Italians introduced into France in the days of Bellerose and Gros Gentlareme. His face is a three-act tragedy reduced to one look: a gray glaze is over the eye ; the passionate, sensual mouth is just dropping with a horrible, agonizing grimace that conveys to you the very gasp and sickness of the first sensation of a vital wound. The face is drawn with the pain; and from under the white fool’s-cap the death-sweat trickles through the white fool’s paint still on the vicious cheeks, just as rain- drops do through the silvery mist on a winter window-pane. His legs are thrust out stiff and straight in the broad, loose fool’s dress, and one hand still holds the thin, sharp sword and another clutches at life. Pierrot, poor, mad, stabbed Pierrot, is held in the half careless arms of a Duc de Guise, in the full white truffles, short black coat, and slanted close cap of that Bartholomean age. Sorry or careless, you hardly know which, for his dark face is bent with a sullen anxiety over the sped man. A Doge of Venice, in a great flaunting robe of flowered green satin, with another over it of scarlet, edged with deep stiff gold lace, bends over Pierrot, groping, with horror in his face, for the actual orifice of the wound, from which black small hole ooze, fast and pulsing, dark drops that race down the fool’s white dress, over the round cotton tufts that ornament it, and all down the stiffening limbs into a red pool on the trodden snow. Behind him is a more conventional face—a brother or father in a passion of grief, his hands up to beat his temples or tear his hair, to think that here a change is coming that no love, or prayer, or enduring, can stop. His long, black, lace- trimmed domino trails out behind against the Doge’s crimson. The gray cloak of the dying Pierrot and his staring, impudent mask lie beside him on the snow; and there, to the right of the picture, are the victors, miserable, though they have won the game. The red Indian who fought has his back to us, and is hurrying away, conscience-stricken, and already repentant, to his coach—that black thing that looms through the fog. His second—perhaps his Asmodeus, his prompter, 74 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. his evil genius—a harlequin, a mottle of dull green and red, the spangle and tinsel all gone when last night's lamps went out with a repentant stench at the wicked- ness they had seen—has him hurriedly by the arm. They are no longer mere friends, they are both criminals. He tries to cheer him with an ill-assumed boldness. ‘The thing is,’ he says, ‘an everyday thing,’ and so is murder! nothing ! accident! But the murderer is already bowed and aged with sorrow. He has only the selfish satisfaction of having himself escaped. Oh, that it had peen his arm, he thinks ; or that I had dis umed him! but that grinding thrust ! There is the sword—dropped as it was drawn from the cloven heart ! The harlequin has a great-coat thrust on by one sleeve like a hussar jacket, just as, hot and fired with brandy, they tumbled into the coach and drove straight for the lonely wood outside the Boulevards. How we long that that bent man in the long, skin cloak and fur hood, with the tasseled moccasins, and hair tied up in a knot, with gaudy red and yellow macaw feathers stuck through, would turn, that we might see and profit by his anguish! Well may the frozen tree shake their long, black, spectral fingers over the scene—the horrible sequel of a night of vice. ‘And there are two coaches seen through the fog, with the skeleton-looking horses, fit only to draw an orphan’s hearse to a cheap funeral, with their carrion heads drooping with the night’s toil and roll. One coachman is holding up his hand in horror at the scene; he wonders if any one will pay his fare, or if he will be arrested. He does not like carrying home the dead fool. The other waits and listens, ungesticulating. There, too, the two long paths of stamped footprints in the snow; the one right, the other left. They drive round to avoid the gendarmes, who don’t like to see two cabs driving together at odd hours to the duelists’ wood. “And this is the end of it. Those two trodden plats of snow, a dead body, and a guilty heart, all to come from that war of music and of voices, that deluge of shouts and laughter and screams, that whirl of feet-stamps, that jostle and hell-pool of vicious, leering faces and wanton eyes, that fog and eddy of colors and sound, of hot patchouli, of rose, of frangipanni, of muslin and ribbons, of fools, goblins, peasant girls, witches, and monks—and all for what? “There is an epitome of a hundred passionate novels in this painting, which is worthy of M. Delaroche’s best pupil. There is room in it for all shades of painting, from the speckle of Teniers to the willowy sweep of Rubens. impetuosity and M. Géréme’s care. A finer moral lesson than this of M. Géréme’s has not been taught since Hogarth’s time.” There is room for Vernet’s Claretie, in some reminiscences of a visit to Chantilly many years later, when he again saw the original, writes : “This picture, which has lost nothing of its picturesque coloring or dramatic qualities, soon popularized the name of Gérome, till then acclaimed by connois- seurs. It was a success without precedent. The 20,000 francs for which the little cwadro was sold, seemed then to have the value of 200,000 of to-day. NI a LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. This distressing scene in this dreary winter landscape, this masquerade ending in butchery, this ball at the opera looking into the morgue, caused a vivid impression, the poignancy of which was heightened by the finished execution.” One might easily believe that nothing could be altered or added to heighten the effect of this master composition ; but an artist like Gérome always sees room for improvement, and eagerly seizes any opportunity that may offer for a finishing touch. Ina letter to the dealer charged with the sale of the replica from which the engraving was made, he writes : “T learn with the greatest pleasure that you have sold the reproduction of the Duel that I have done for you, and I am all the more pleased since I hear it has been bought by a distinguished amateur ; one is always glad to know one’s off- spring is well located. The alterations I have made from the original picture have singularly improved this composition, especially in its general aspect ; some sacrifices made in the background have left to the premier plan, that is to say, to the important figures, all their effect, and I regret not to have thought of it at first, when I executed the original. This improvement has been most valuable, and you would have been struck with it had you been able to see one with the other. I have modified also the head of the savage; it was not well understood at first who was the adver. ary ; now it is plain to every one and confusion is no longer possible. In short, I think I have improved as much as possible on my first work, and I am happy that it has fallen into the hands of Mr. Walters of Baltimore, since I am told he can appreciate things seriously conceived and seriously executed.” One canvas in this unequaled exhibit still remains undescribed, ‘‘a picture,” says De Tanouarn, ‘“‘remarkable for absolutely Oriental coloring, its grave and devotional sentiment, and its physiognomies, slightly savage, yet altogether touching.” And Gautier writes : “However great the merit of the Duel, we prefer the Prayer in the House of an Arnaut Chief, which attracts less of acrowd. There is in this picture a spirit of tranquillity, contemplation, and conviction that is truly admirable. The scene has for a stage a chamber of thoroughly Oriental nudity: a low divan running around walls roughly whitewashed, a ceiling showing all the beams, and on the side a door draped with a portiére. The floor is partly covered by a mat of plaited rushes, which is re-covered by a Turkish or Persian carpet. On the walls hang guns, rifles, and muskets of various forms ; a panoply of battle-axes and yataghans is combined with a tall palm; from the ceiling descends a chandelier made of glasses, filled with oil, like those one sees in the mosques. A small round table in cedar-wood and mother-of-pearl, in charming taste, supports a three-branched brass candlestick holding large wax candles. In the foreground is a line of babouches, slippers, shoes, and savates, curious specimens of Mussulman shoemak- ing—for the votaries of Mahomet bare their feet for all the occasions on which Christians uncover their heads. LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. x “An old man, of vigorous and venerable appearance, his hands lifted in a sacramental posture, recites the szras of the Koran with an air of profound faith, turned toward the East—toward that Mecca where are found the tomb of homet, the black stone, and the well of Zem-Zem. Behind him, like pious soldiers obeying the commands of their chief, stand eight persons in a row, their feet touching the carpet ; they are rough fellows, with picturesque and savage counte- nances, softened for the moment by a religious sentiment. A lively faith shines in these uncultivated, swarthy, and ferocious faces. Each head presents a particular type, with all the verity of a portrait. Always remaining within the limits of the severest art, M. Gérome has made an ethnographic study as exact as that of M. Valerio in the provinces of the Danube. M. Serres, the anthropologist, could take notes from these specimens of almost unknown races with all con- fidence. By this scrupulous fidelity, of which he has already given proof in the Recreation of the Russian Soldiers,so much admired at the Universal Exposition, M. Géréme satisfies one of the most imperious instincts of the time; the desire which nations have to become acquainted with each other, otherwise than by means of portraits taken from the imagination. He possesses all that is necessary to fulfill this important mission : an eye which sees quickly and correctly, a hand that executes learnedly and surely,—writing down each detail with the impertur- bable clearness of the daguerreotype,—and, above all, a perception which we may call exotic,—for want of a more precise term,—which enables him to discover at once the characteristics by which one race differs from another. “We have had an opportunity of meeting in Constantinople with most of the types represented by M. Géréme, and we recognize them perfectly. Here is really the Arnaut and the Armatole, with their tall, bony frames, their shaven temples, and their long mustaches; the Bulgarian—already almost a Russian— with his reddish beard and lion-like head of hair, and the Syrian wearing his chachyeh—all are here, even this lovely blond child, with the silky hair falling from underneath the /arbouch,as beautiful as a woman and serious as a man, who makes one think of the Greek Amour,and the Orientales of Victor Hugo. A little behind this row,a slave joins in the prayer, made, for a moment, by his religion, the equal of his masters. All these personages are dressed in varied and pictur- esque costumes. The /wstanelle, spread like a bell, touches the do/iman with its straight folds; the elbow of the braided jacket jostles the flowing sleeve, the fez and the turban alternate ; the pommels of sandjars and pistols bristle in the belts of embroidered morocco or peep out from the folds of a scarf. All this is ren- dered with the delicate firmness which is peculiarly characteristic of the artist. The almost uniform attitudes are relieved from monotony by slight differences, which do not strike one at first. Among these believers some hands are raised like those of the chief; others are pendent or resting on the hips; others have the thumbs passed through the sword-belt, a posture common to the Orientals ; LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. Wil but all listen to the sacred words with a devotion and faith that should put to shame many Catholics. “Before this picture, the most perfect as yet produced by the young master, the critic, who never willingly waives his rights, seeks a dwt or an only (like the restrictive personage in the Hawx Bons-hommes) to qualify the merited praise. In order, then, not to ‘miss our calling’ let us reproach M. Géréme with too subdued a coloring, arising from a sacrifice to the general harmony, and nothing remains to be said. He has been the first to study the Orient as a painter of history; he has sought for style where others, whom we never- theless admire, have only looked for color. Let us accept then, separately, the drawing of M. Géroéme and the color of Decamps. He who could unite them to an equal degree would be more than human. If Michael Angelo said, ‘What a pity they do not know how to draw at Venice!’ Titian could right- fully reply to him, ‘What a pity they do not know how to paint at Rome!’” We should not be surprised to find some lengthy record in the artist’s souve- nirs of this matchless exposition, which exhausted the repertoires of laudatory phrases in the vocabulary of /a critique. But he writes simply, ‘‘ Another of my pictures, on which I did not place any great expectations, was painted at this time (1857), The Duel after the Masquerade, a composition a little after the English taste, the subject of which laid hold of the public. Pretty good execu- tion ; several bits well treated (belongs to the collection of the Duc d’Aumale).” And of the others not a word! A proceeding most characteristic of this artist, who never loses a minute in conjecturing the effect of his productions or in savoring the applause which might have turned the head of a less indefatigable, less absorbed worker. Long before the crowds in front of these masterpieces had begun to diminish he was again at work. And again we have to thank M. Gautier for a faithful chronicle of his labor. “The young painter, whose activity is untiring, has just finished (May, 1858), for the salon of the Pompeian residence of Prince Napoleon in the Avenue Montaigne, three panels, representing Homer accompanied by his two immortal daughters, the [liad and the Odyssey. In the central panel the god-like beggar, raising his blind eyes to heaven as if to invoke Mnemosyne, is chanting one of his sublime rhapsodies; the young child who acts as his guide stands between the knees of the poet and holds out a wooden bowl, soliciting the charity of the passers-by. On the two other panels, on a background of antique red, are depicted the two epics—that of the warrior and that of the wanderer. The young artist has succeeded in creating something new, even after the superb TS, figures on the ceiling by M. Ingres.” This beautiful palace has been arranged by the government as a museum, and is well worth the attention of the passing tourist as well as of the art-con- noisseur and student. Ni eo LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. In a review of an exhibition of modern pictures for the benefit of the “Society for the Relief of Painters, Sculptors, and Architects,” we find a notice of a charming picture which was also finished this year : “ The Collection (La Quéte) represents a choir-boy, or rather a young seminarist, seated against a wainscoting, and holding an alms-purse upon his knees; the face is gentle, sad, sickly—already fatigued by study, prayer, and mortification ; the weak chest is concealed by the black cassock, and the hands clasp each other mechanically as if in an exercise of devotion. One would answer for the vocation of this budding young Levite. His eyes, cast down, look at nothing, and neither the sound of a piece of gold in his purse nor the rustle of a S. silken robe will cause him to raise his glance; he is entirely absorbed in God. The artist has succeeded in putting into this little painting an austere sobriety, a sort of Jansenism of color. No brilliant tones, no bright lights, no straining for effect ; nothing but the dim twilight of the sanctuary over a pale, immovable figure, already dead to this world, though still young, and awaiting in silence, for the poor children of Jesus Christ, the rich man’s gold and the widow's mite. We are happy to note also an etching of the young master, a souvenir of his travels in Egypt. It is a negress, with eyes half closed as if dazzled by the sun, thick lips, and cheeks as polished as those of a statue in basalt. All this is indicated in a few swift and sure strokes of the needle which tell much more than all the patient labor of the engraver’s tools. It is a sketch on copper which is worth an original drawing. The biting of the acid has changed nothing.” Well may the critic marvel at the “untiring zeal” of the young artist, for this same year marked a successful incursion into a new field of activity, which excited even the surprise of his earliest friend and patron. In L’Artiste of the 16th of May, 1858, we find the following article; “A few weeks ago we declared that contemporaneous artists, confining them- selves too closely to pictures and statues, did not sufficiently consider the realities of this century. If anything characterizes our epoch, it is certainly the railway carriage. One could not find a more significant design to put on the coat-of- Well! M. Gérome, the author of the Combat de the arms of the nineteenth centut Cogs, L’Intérieur Grec, Bacchus et l Amour, and of L’Afpothéose d' Auguste, painter of so antique, so pure, and so rare a feeling,—is decorating a railway carriage! We are happy that our assertion has received so prompt a denial. “This car has been offered by the Company of Roman Railways to our very Holy Father the Pope, and nothing has been neglected that would render it is divided into three compartments: an worthy of the Sovereign Pontiff. It is oratory, a salon, and a sleeping-chamber. Four angels in gold and silver, the medallions of the twelve apostles, and panels of bronze adorn the exterior. The salon is decorated with paintings by M. Géréme, arranged as follows : “ Facing the throne, and seated upon a marble bench rounded in a hemicycle, her feet resting on steps strewn with palms of the martyrs, Religion seems to LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 79 regard the Pope—her representative on earth, She has as emblem, the chalice, surmounted by the radiant Host. Above her hovers the inspiring Holy Spirit. On either side stand the two pillars of the Church: St. Peter with the keys, St. Paul with the sword. The background is a light, blue sky, the top of which forms the vaulted ceiling which joins the of the two side compositions. One of these paintings represents the Pope surrounded by cardinals and bishops and from the top of a pier blessing the approaching steamboat, which connects with a trail of fire the French and Roman railways; the Church is invoking heavenly protection upon the genius of man. The other shows us the Holy Father making the s impatiently blowing o of mythology. red gesture over a locomotive ready to take flight, and jets of steam from its nostrils of brass, like the monsters “We have expressly described, in their official barrenness, these three subjects—of which the latter two would seem unfruitful and prosaic to the majority of artists. M. Géréme has, however, succeeded admirably with them. The first would only have to be enlarged to worthily form a hemicycle for a chapel; the other two show that the style lies in the talent of the painter and not in the theme he treats. “The benediction of the boat has a solemnity without exaggeration, a majestic disposition of lines, an elevated character, which is often wanting in the most elaborate of historical pictures. The cardinals in their purple and ermine, the bishops with their white miters and da/maties of brocade, the Swiss Guards in their mediaeval costumes, respectfully surround the Pope in happy groupings which are rich without confusion. The heads, some of which are portraits, have a varied and individual stamp, and the smallness of proportions takes away none of the grandeur of character. The Pope faces the sea, which washes against the foot of the pier, and which is indicated by a coil of chain and masts of ships stretching up in a corner of the panel. By a happy contrivance, which insures riety, the blessing of the loco- motive is taken in profile. The Holy Pontiff has advanced to the edge of the platform ; his immediate attendants hold over his head great fans of white umes, and behind him the sacred procession displays itself in fine priestly attitudes, of which the chiefs among the Roman clergy seem alone to po the secret, and which add so much to the impression produced by religious omp. What noble heads of prelates and monks, and what dignity among details ! “All this is executed in the firm, distinguished manner which belongs only to M. Gérome, and clothed in soft, harmonious tints, more genuine in our opinion than the loud tones which the multitude denominate ‘fine coloring.’ “A Holy Vi lost sheep on his shoulders, painted half-length in medallions of embossed gilding in néo-byzantine style, complete the decoration of the interior. Outside, on the frieze of the carriage, are the heads of the twelve apostles, painted by M. Gérome these Catholic patricians, even to the smalles gin with the child Jesus, and the Good Shepherd bearing the on disks of gold. It would be difficult to decorate more tastefully and more fitly a > offered to the Pope. carriag 80 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, ibes “The Pope—a railway carriage! Strange junction of words which descr in itself our age : the ancient and modern spirit—unchangeable tradition blessing indefinite progr We could fill a column with this theme, but we prefer to use it in betraying the secrets of the young painter's atelier. “While looking at these decorative panels, we peeped out of the corner of our eye at some canvases in more or less advanced stages of progress, and which we are sure will produce, when finished, a great impression at the next Exposi- tion. M. Géréme is not only correct and skillful with pencil and brush, but he is also a man of the most fine and fertile mind. He does not content himself, as so many others do, with the commonplace across which he stumbles; he loves variety in his subjects and he knows how to treat ordinary scenes in a wholly unexpected manner.” In view of the extraordinary achievements of this year, it is with a sense of amazement that we consider his exhibit at the Salon of 1859. He seems to have been drawn with irresistible force back to the contemplation of life in ancient Greece and Rome, which for a time had been superseded by his study of Oriental types and customs; and an eager multitude, spellbound before this new and thrilling manifestation of his genius and learning, bore witness to the ever-augmenting power of this first and foremost of historical painters. Small wonder that these masterpieces should inspire Gautier to one of his finest efforts in the department of analytic description. In the Moniteur Universel, he writes : “The young master who made so brilliant a début ten years ago with the Combat de Cogs,—a charming picture, which could have been taken for an antique colored bas-relief,—has a searching and penetrative disposition ; he is always in quest of uncommon themes. Rarity pleases him ; novelty seduces him ; he loves adventures in art and he provokes them at his own risk and peril. It is not he who will repeat with slight variations a motif that has been well received, as many painters do who are quick of execution and slow in invention, and who reproduce imperturbably the same picture all their lives long. Without having written a single line, that we know of at least, M. Géréme has a literary tendency which betrays itself in the choice of his subjects,in erudition of detail, and archaical exactitude. It is not we, indeed, who will find fault with him for this. This kind of transposition renews the youth of Art, and infuses a little new blood into its veins. M.Géréme possesses also the ethnographic perception so necessary to the modern painter to-day, when so many races, which yesterday were un- known, spring up to the light and enter into the ever-widening circle of human types to be analyzed. He has proved it by his Recreation of the Russian Soldiers, his Arnauts at Prayer, and his Egyptian Recruits. The Cock Fight, the Greek Interior, and the Age of Augustus have shown us how familiar he is with ancient times and with what accuracy he can make them live again; he can even be contemporaneous and produce tragic effects with a common carnival brawl. To CLEOPATRA AND C4SAR. LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 8 wo elevate Harlequin and Pierrot to the height of serious art, and show the pallor of death beneath the powder of the disguise—this was not an easy task. That he has succeeded has been amply proven. This year M. Géréme has only traveled in time! he exhibits three antique pictures: Cesar; Ave Cesar, Imperator / moriturt te salutant,and King Candaules. “ Cesar, the largest of these three canvases, and the only one of historical proportions, engrosses the eye, as far as it can be perceived, by its sinister, solitary, and mysterious appearance, even before the subject has been distinguished. Ina deserted hall, whose perspective shows only the pedestals of columns and the feet of statues, through the shadows of evening which are falling, one descries at first an armchair overturned upon the steps of a dais; then, under a mass of white draperies, disordered and bloodstained, a dead body, whose brow is crowned with leaves of beaten gold; this was Cesar! Their task accomplished, the murderers have departed, the senators have fled, and in the general stupor no one thinks to take up the body. The master of the world lies on the ground, on the spot where he fell, abandoned, alone in the deepening shadows, while without, the city, aghast at the frightful news, is agitated and tumultuous. “ This manner of conceiving the subject denotes a reflective and philosophic spirit. The tumult of murder would have enticed a less thoughtful painter, and doubtless the effect would have been less. Besides, M. Géréme has studied this composition from several points of view, and has chosen the most sober, the most severe, and the most tragic. We remember to have seen on an easel in his atelier a smaller canvas, where the death of Caesar was treated in a more anecdotal manner, so to speak. We hope that M. Géréme will finish this picture of which the Cesar, now on exhibition, is only a fragment, enlarged, idealized, and trans- figured to heroic size. The poem should not take the place of the memory. On the large canvas, the impression ; on the smaller, the actual truth.’ This striking picture, a life-size study for which occupies a prominent place in the Corcoran Gallery at Washington, furnished a theme for many able pens. Masson, referring to a subsequent statement that ‘‘Gérome had many times clearly shown in various celebrated pictures the philosophic power of his mind,” says, ‘‘ The first of these in date was the Cwsar exposed at the Salon of 1859. We remember it well: Cesar, alone, dead, lying at the feet of the bronze statue in the deserted Hall of the Senate before the overturned throne.” Some amiable jesters, some of those who try in painting to be facetious, have called this picture ‘‘Washerwoman’s Day.” We leave the reply to Charles Baudelaire, who was very far from being one of Géréme’s admirers. “Julius Cesar! What splendor, as of the setting sun, the name of this man sheds upon the imagination! If ever a man on this earth resembled the Deity it was Cesar. Mighty and fascinating; brave, learned, and generous! All force, all glory, all charm! He whose greatness surpassed his victories, and who grew in grandeur even in death! He whose breast, pierced by the dagger, gave forth 84 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. only a cry of paternal love, and who found the wound of the steel less cruel than the wound of ingratitude. Certainly this time the imagination of M. Géréme has been swept away ; it reached an admirable height when it conceived its Cesar, alone, prostrate before his overturned throne,—the body of this Roman, who was pontiff, warrior, orator, historian, and master of the world,—///ing this immense and deserted hall. This manner of treating the subject has been criticised! It cannot be too highly praised. ‘The effect is truly grand. This terrible résumé suffices. We are all sufficiently well acquainted with Roman history to picture to ourselves all that is sows-entendu—the disorder which preceded and the tumult which followed. We divine Rome behind these walls, and we hear the cries of this stupid and freed people, alike ungrateful to victim and assassin, ‘Let us make Brutus, Ceesar !’ Masson remarks, ‘‘ This page consoles us for many absurdities in the way of criticism.” We find also in one of De Tanouarn’s thoughtful essays the following just reflections : “Let us beware of imagining that it is impossible to render a general idea, or the physiognomy of an epoch or a nation, by a single action drawn from history. On the contrary, art gains much, and the idea does not lose thereby. I need no other proof than that which Gérome himself furnishes. His Cwsar is assuredly not a complicated subject ; it is simplicity reduced to its utmost limits, since there is on the canvas but a single personage, or rather only a body! but the body is that of Cesar! The emptiness of the scene makes one think of the void which the disappearance of such a man is going to create in the world—a void which will only be filled by frightful wars and bloody proscriptions. This work is without doubt the best that Gérome has yet composed. Possessed by a happy idea, he has expressed all the interest and emotion it could possibly contain.” An impressive contrast to the quietude of this scene is found in that which bears the ominously significant title, “ Wail, Cesar, Emperor / those about to die salute thee! “This is the picture s Gautier] before which the crowd stops most willingly. To see it, it is almost necessary to fall in line as we did last year before the Duef. O honest and intelligent crowd! whom we have so often abused when we have surprised thee in the act of using as a mirror the varnish of some abominable painting! we gladly award thee the praise thou meritest in standing thus before a real work of art! “M. Gérome has rebuilt the Roman circus with the unexceptionable science of the architect, the antiquarian, and the historian; never has a restoration succeeded better. It seems as if the artist had lived in the times of the Czesars and assisted in person at these bloody games; and, after the representation, had sketched the principal episodes on his canvas. Where has he found all these LIFE AND WORKS O. lost details, these characteristic parti and neglected by history? for such “Here and there—a little in the poets and writers, medallions, paintings on vases and all t F JEAN LEON GEROME. 85 culars, faded from the memory of man things cannot be invented. a great deal in bas-reliefs, he oxidized relics of antiquity, the excava- tion of which has revealed the secrets of the past. A prodigious patience was needful to gather together those scattered elements; and a great art to group them, to blend them, and make them live. “At the right of the picture rises the /oge of Cesar, adorned by slender columns with red flut- ings, gilded on the projecting angles, surmounted by winged figures of victory, and twined with golden foliage—from which are suspended shields bearing heads of the Medusa. On the plinth is engraved the name of Vitellius, but even without the inscription he would be quickly recognized, bending his arm like the handle of a pot-bellied vase, to lean his fat hand upon his knee, a cascade of triple chins falling upon his great chest and displaying the amplitude of his obese majesty. Near him, the Empress, haughty and absent- minded; behind him, the court- iers—the favorites standing in attitudes of respectful familiarity. Beside the imperial /oge are the vestals in their snowy draperies, ready to raise or reverse the thumb which deci the benches, divided by staircases leac a multitude in varied and vivid colors flebs in their gray tunics. Overhead, des for life or death. Farther on, upon ing to the doors of the circular corridors, swarms up to the region occupied by the 1eld by cords attached to staffs and rings of bronze, and decorated with elephants, tigers, and lions, is the immense velarium A forgotten. Red panels color the barri color—the blood will not show! In gned to protect the spectators from the sun. No detail is er that surrounds the arena; it is a good the background is a door in the form of a triumphal arch, crowned by a chariot drawn by four horses abreast. By this door the dead animals and murdered men are dragged away, for the endings of this fierce Roman drama have but little variety! ‘‘Beneath the imperial /oge the ¢ customary salute; they are preceded adiators, ready for the contest, make the by their impresario, a kind of pompous 86 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. comedian, of cruel, cunning mien, coquettishly wrapped in his mantle and leaning like a dandy on a slender stick. The gladiators wear strange casques, some with eyes shielded, others with the visor half lowered, and others entirely masked, according to the specialty of the combatants. Their legs are protected by cne- mides ; a wide belt of buffalo-leather ornamented with a row of copper coins is worn like a cuirass, leaving exposed their sturdy ches Their thighs are half- covered by a short tunic, girt up so as not to emba their movements; a ight shield defends the left arm; the right arm is protected by laced thongs, armlets, gauntlets, or iron mittens reaching to the fingers. On their shoulders folded the net of the retiarius, and they brandish aloft the trident with its seen points. Some of them have not yet lowered their visors, and one can their short faces, with the heavy jaws and prominent chin, stamped with sullen resignation and brutish courage; by their theatrical attitude, one divines that they are proud to perform before the eyes of so distinguished a public. t must be, indeed, disagreeable for a gladiator to waste the elegancies of his death-agony on empty benches, or on people who are no judges! “Tn the opposite corner lie two dead gladiators. One of them, tangled in the meshes of the net, has not been able to escape the prongs of the fatal trident ; the other has a deep wound in his breast. He must have been loudly applauded, for he has fallen in the classic pose so well known to sculptors. In the back- ground an under-servant takes handfuls of sand from a basket, suspended from his belt, to soak up the pools of blood in which the feet of the combatants might slip; a slave, in a striped tunic, throws his hook at a body and exerts his whole strength to draw it toward him. Others, preceded by two players disguised as Mercury and Pluto, drag their victims toward the charnel-house ; derisive funeral honors paid to the human form! A ray of sunlight, placid mockery of indifferent Nature, falls precisely upon the bloody funeral procession. All this ceremonial is to be seen at the bull-fights in Spain; but the mules, with their tinkling bells and multi-colored pompons, have only to drag away the bulls or disemboweled horses. Man escapes the peril by his bravery and skill.” De Tanouarn gives also an admirable critique of this che/d’euvre, and adds : “Vitellius is well chosen as a personification of that monstrous Roman civilization, wholly exterior and wholly material. The lust of antiquity puffs and sweats under this shapeless mass of fat, this gross exterior, swollen like a leather bottle which threatens to burst. It is thus that historical painting should be approached ; it is thus that an artist, without abandoning any of the nece ry plastic qualities or omitting the dramatic and picturesque elements of an action, elevates himself to the dignity of a moralist and a philosopher. It is incontest- able that Géréme is an ingenious painter, learned and profound. He is a skillful and patient searcher after ideas; he is not content that his canvas should be clothed with agreeable images—he exacts that it should ¢hin&/ Never does he seize his brushes without a full consciousness of what he wishes to do; if he hesitates, it is only as to a choice of the means which will best render what his intelligence has conceived.” LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LLON GEROME 87 Beside this exciting spectacle hung a canvas representing a page of Greek history which had already furnished Gautier with material for an exquisite romance, He Says: “Had we not an ideal which guarantees us against all self-love, we might be proud of our little antique novelette, ‘King Candaules,’ which has inspired Pradier to make a statue and Géroéme to paint a picture. Marble and canvas have ortrayed our Nyssia in a manner far superior to the text. The chisel and the brush are worth more than the pen, especially in such hands and when there is a question of beauty. Our readers are doubtless all acquainted with this bit of history, related in the first place by Herodotus. It offers to both sculpture and yainting a subject full of resources. M. Géréme has recomposed, with that instinct for antiquity which so rarely deceives him, the interior of the Gre 20- Asiatic palace inhabited by the King of Sardia, concerning which the arche- ologist has had only vague data. Candaules is lying on a bed of sculptured ivory, ornamented with bas-reliefs and shields of gold; upon the walls are drawn the mysterious symbols of Oriental religions; the feet of his statues still remain unsculptured, in the block of stone from Egypt or 4=gina; strips of wood are interwoven to form the door behind which Gyges conceals himself ; the delicate feet of Nyssia rest upon the skin of the Nemean lion, heritage of Hercules; the artist has left nothing to be desired save to see the profile of this woman whose beauty was so great that her own husband betrayed its sacred perfection. The form, from which the drapery is just slipping, is exquisite in its divine Mar- morean pallor.” The moment chosen by the painter is that when Nyssia is disrobing and making a sign to Gyges to rush forward and kill her traitor husband. This scene, where offended womanly dignity takes its just revenge upon treacherous sensuality, is treated with the chaste nobility of pose and expression to be found in all this artist’s paintings from the nude, which excite only admiration for the pure artistic beauty of contour and plastic grace. Yet it is almost a relief to turn from these themes, that gripe the heart and stir the emotions, to the tranquillity of the Arnauts Playing Chess. The thoughtful countenances bent over the board are drawn with the perfect skill that has so often been commented on, and which renders these types with all the truthfulness of Nature’s modeling. The imper- turbability of the Oriental character is well illustrated by the attitudes of the players, who betray no emotion over the game. Gain or lose? What can it mat- ter? ‘‘ What will be, will be,” and they disquiet themselves no more as to the out- come of the passionless contest than they do over the smoke that rises steadily from the chibouk and vanishes in the air. Life, with its struggles and aspira- tions, its joys and agonies, what is it all save a faint /amée—now here, now gone ! There is but one end, resistless, inevitable! The boast of the king is strangled in his throat as the poniard is driven home with deadly thrust; the iron-muscled, 88 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON G ROME. iron-hearted gladiators succumb not only to Roman cruelty and power, but to the Conqueror of all flesh, and, gasping, cry to him also ‘‘ Morituri te salutant” ; e’en Cesar falls—and who can tell where he now lies, or trace the ‘‘noble dust of Alex- ander"? It is doubly interesting to know what the artist himself thought of these creations, that compelled alike the serious and the frivolous to stop and admire. We return to his notes, where we find allusion only to the two most important in this exhibit. He writes : “Tn 1859 I exposed the Gladiators before Caesar (Mori- turi), which I consider, with another canvas of the same nature (Pollice Verso), as my two best works. The first was looked at sufficiently, but I do not think it achieved much ss. While painting it I had not at my disposition all succe the documents that I since have gathered together to work up the second. It fails from certain archeological points of view, and in this respect the fault is a grave one; for, in truth, the gladiators were exceptional beings, who resem- bled in no wise the soldiers of that period ; wearing odd helmets and enormous arms, offensive and defensive, of a very peculiar character and form. In such a case, verity of detail is important, for it adds to the physiognomy and gives to the people a barbarous and savage cachez, at once strange and striking. I have said before that this painting was not a very great success, and yet the composition was new, the dramatic side well represented, and the whole effect well enough realized—the restitution of the circus with its ve/wm was thought out with much care. I will say but little of the second. It appeared much later, when I had assembled all possible information that could contribute to its exactness. I think it better than the first in many respects; it has more of the accent of truth, and renders more clearly the brutal side of these Romans, by whom human life was counted as nothing. At the same time [1859] I sent out from my atelier the Death of Cesar, which some amiable critics have called ‘Washerwoman’s Day!’ I myself am no enemy of quiet gayety this , and I recognize and appreciate the comicality of joke ; but, all modesty aside, this composition merits more serious attention ; the presentation of the subject is dramatic and original. It is a small canvas, which could have been executed on a larger scale without losing its character ; which I cannot say of many of my works.” Commenting on this very passage, Bergerat says : g 3 g g a “One should read and re-read this confidential page, written so freely and so easily, for it is a model of impartial, learned, and honest criticism. It contains in a few words Géréme entire ‘esthetics.’ Once again, I say, every one is not capable of thus passing judgment on himself! Erudition plays a great role in the QUARENS QUEM DEVORET 1889 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 89 work of the master, and all that he says of the exactness of his casques and armor for his gladiators applies, equally, to all the paintings he has signed, especially during later years. I find the modern naturalism, so peculiar to all the great minds of our time, in this insatiable passion for archaic ¢rwth which distin- guishes the productions of this painter. But I had always believed that in Gérome the ethnographic gift took the place of scientific acquirement, and that Nature had done everything for him. It remains proved henceforth that not only ha scholar who keeps posted in all the discoveries of critical history. What distin- he the instinctive sense for the antique, but that he possesses it as a guishes him from the scientist, and constitutes in him the @rfis/, is that he subordinates the document to the idea, and not the idea to the document. From this point of view, the painting called Pollice Verso is not only his chef- @euvre, but a chef-d’euvre. The scrupulous exactitude of the slightest de- tails contributes so greatly to the effect of the imagined scene that it is adorned with the certain definiteness which renders a thing absolutely seen so impossible to forget, so unchangeable, created for all time. It is the ideal of in Art. “It was about this time [adds Bergerat| that Géroéme presented himself sucec seriously as a candidate before the Academy, his name having previously figured on the list as a mere formality.” A certain M. Hesse, of whom we never hear, was the candidate of the Institute as opposed to the progressive party, which was led by the Comte de Nieuwerkerke, at that time Superintendent of the Beaux-Arts. Hesse gained the election by one vote, but Gérome was more than compensated for this postponement of the reward due his conspicuous merit, by his appointment as Professor in the Ecole des Beaux-Arts—a position he still holds through pure love of teaching, as the salary is merely nominal and the time spent with his beloved pupils means to him a financial loss of many thousands of francs. He allowed two subsequent elections to pass unheeded. A third vacancy occurring, he consented to stand again and was elected—but, as Claretie observes, ions are unknown ‘without concessions on his part.” And he adds: ‘‘Conces to Gér6me! From head to foot he is upright and resolute.” The year 1860 was one of intense application and preparation for the Salon of 1861, and during this year we find chronicled the appearance of only two pictures, 42 /talian Shepherd and the Donkey-boy of Cairo. In the first one we have a picturesque reminiscence of a sunny day on the Campagna. A passing flock of sheep follows close at the heels of its guardian, who enlivens the way with a rifornello on his bagpipes, while his faithful dog, from a corner of his eye, keeps watch over the dusty animals, which are painted with a fidelity that even a Verboeckhoven might envy. ‘Tis a well-worn theme, but Géréme’s treatment redeems it from the commonplace, and almost invests it with the charm of originality. go LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. In the solemn, priest-like youth, with classic draperies, who posed for the Donkey-boy during Géréme’s first visit to Egypt, we have a perfect type of this indispensable accessory of Oriental life. When not lazily awaiting their patrons, brigades of these gamins de Caire may be seen charging through the streets, yelling vociferously and belaboring the patient bowrrigwots at every step. We find an amusing description of these donkey-boys in an account of the first sortie a@ Vdne through the streets of Cairo, which a merry band under command of ““Colonel” Gér6me made in 1868. As an old soldier on this field of battle, the master laughingly regards the half-terrified amazement of the raw recruits, among whom is Paul Lenoir, his favorite pupil and inseparable companion during a long sojourn in the wilderne It is he who is to embalm their mutual impres- sions in a volume which delightfully describes this eventful journey through Egypt to Sinai and Arabia Petreea, and which is dedicated to the master in the following graceful lines : “Dear Ma whose greatest charm and value lay in the fact that it was made in your company and under your kind direction. Egypt is your property; for if Permit me to offer you these few notes of a journey science and archeology have been able to reconstruct it by its hieroglyphs, you alone have translated its admirable light and brilliant animation, which they could not understand. Recalling the days we passed together in the desert, I venture to ask again the indulgence you then accorded the youngest of your caravan. ; “Your respectful pupil, “Paut Lenor.” Behold this joyous student then,—in Cairo, for the first time,—clutching his teins and digging his heels into his little donkey, in a desperate attempt to preserve his equilibrium. “Chmalak! Yeminak! Reglak! We are rushed into a human whirlpool from which rises an indescribable tumult, increased by the howls and cries of these gamins, who, by well-directed blows, urge on our asses till we attain a rate of speed positively astonishing and, in view of the crowded condition of the streets, not a little disconcerting. Cavaliers, carriages, men, women, children, dogs, and long files of dromedaries attached to each other, are massed in seemingly inextricable confusion. “Chmalak! Reglak! Twenty times in our frenzied course a moving cathe- dral of a camel bears down upon our demoralized band, taking up the middle of the street! Twenty times our marvelous donkeys succeed in avoiding a collision, which would have been as disastrous for these little beasts as for us. Truly these animals have the instinct of circulation !” And not only the animals, but their dusky drivers, who dodge in and out under the feet of the horses and camels, never losing an opportunity to bestow LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. gr a sounding thwack on their respective asses as they rush wildly on, dis- playing, it must be confessed, considerable ‘‘method in their madness”; for they bring up their patrons at one of the gates leading out of the city, without broken bones, but past all power of speech, to the intense amusement of their “Colonel,” who, arrived the first, tranquilly smokes as he awaits the various detachments of his disorganized command! But we must leave for a time this gay company, of whose adventures we shall later be a daily witness, and return to the Salon of 1861, where six varied and powerful canvases gave impos- ing evidence of the fertility of conception and unremitting labor of the master. Timbal comments on this period in his career as follows: “Certain works indicate a culminating point in talent which the artist scarcely ever surpasses; the Duel of Pierrot seemed such a one. It rapidly became popular ; reproduced by the painter himself, and many times by engrav- ing and photography, it is remembered by every one. But thi has its danger, and it is often well to look it in the face, to weigh it, and not permit one’s self to be overpowered by it. How many people, without ill-will, recall it at each new effort, as if it had become impossible for the artist hence- forth to surpass himself! Géréme knew how to cope with praise! Besides, he remembered other compositions of his, less looked at, less piquant in invention, but which serious critics, and he himself, ranked above the Due/, Indeed, with- out pretending to diminish in the slightest degree, by comparison, the value of this moving picture, we venture to place beside it the simple idyl of 7he Straw- cutting, which seems an illustration contemporary with Herodotus, or a leaf taken from a chapter of the Bible. This juxtaposition proves in Gérome com- prehension of Nature, and the flexibility of an imagination which has been accused of sterility. He roams thus at will in every path, halting not more willingly before a bloody drama than before a field of wheat gilded by the sun; indifferent, if you please, by force of eclecticism, and bewildering the psychology of those who love to confine within certain limits the sensibility of the soul, which, it seems to me, should rather receive all shocks and, if possible, render pecies of success back all harmonies.” This exquisite pastoral poem of the Hache-faille, which so impressed Timbal, appeared at the Salon of 1861. Gautier writes of it : “We greatly love the Straw-cutting in Egypt. Its almost priestly seriousness harmonizes well with the talent of the painter. An Egyptian, grave and tranquil as the melancholy Osiris, guides around, over a circle of sheaves, a car built like a throne, drawn by two buffaloes and rolling on metal wheels ; behind him, like an aoéris behind a Pharaoh, is a youth, also in profile. One would pronounce it a drawing from a necropolis in Thebes; and nevertheless it is a faithful sketch of a living reality. A dazzling sun,—throwing its rays over the yellow disk of sheaves, which reminds us of the golden circle of Osymandias—silvers the 92 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. heavens and tints the horizon with rose. What grandeur and what solemnity in this simple labor of agriculture! The drawing is as firm as an incision in granite—the coloring as rich as the illumination of a sacred papyrus.” As further proof of the versatile genius of this great artist, there hung beside this Oriental idyl a picture of Rembrandt Etching in his Atelier, which Timbal pronounces one of his best works, ‘“‘One of those which with justice should silence those critics who are unable to recast their foregone conclusions, and who, without taking into account the artist's claims, or even his progress, con- tinue to reproach him for being an archeologist wandering from his sphere.” The Rembrandt was a gem of purest quality, and all the connoisseurs of the time were in a ferment of admiration over this unexpected revelation of tone- power. Gautier charmingly describes the scene: “The light, falling from a high window and filtering through one of those frames covered with white paper, which engravers use to soften the glare of the copper, creeps over the table, touches the bottles filled with water or acid, diffuses itself through the chamber, and dies away in obscure corners in warm, mysterious half-shadows. Rembrandt, clad in black and bending over the table, reflects the light on a plate in order to ascertain the depth of the incision. Noth- ing more. But here is genuine matter for a painter's brush ; light concentrated on one point and diminishing by imperceptible degrees, starting with white and ending with bitumen. This is equal in value to any literary or spirituelle fancy, and Rembrandt himself has scarcely portrayed any other, in his pictures or his etchings. The plate which he is in process of biting probably depicts a scene of this genre. The Rembrandt is a marvel of delicacy, transparency, and effect. Never has M. Gér6me shown himself more of a color This Pompeian, this painter @ “encaustigue, this illuminator of Greek vases, has achieved at the first essay the absolute perfection of the Dutch mas ic Still another note in this far-reaching but harmonious chord, that, transposed into different keys, vibrates with new power and richne Now it passes into the minor, and reveals to us the pale, inspired features of a great representative of another phase of Art. “The portrait of Rachel [says Gautier | is at the same time a portrait and a personification. Tragedy has blended itself with the tragedienne, the Muse with the actress ; draped in red and orange, she stands erect under a severe Doric portico. Somber passions, fatalities, and tragic furies contract her pale counte- nance. Yes, it is Rachel sinister, savage, and violent.” De Tanouarn also writes : “This portrait has not only the merit of great individual resemblance, it is the austere and noble image of Tragedy itself. And truly, Rachel was tragedy incarnate, passing through living realities of the epoch like a pale and majestic phantom.” ‘MVSHO JO HLVAC AHL LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 95 This impressive canvas hangs in the historic collection of the Théatre Frangais, and never fails to arrest the eye by its weird and melancholy grandeur. And now come three scenes from the antique, the first of which, under the title Two Augurs cannot Regard each Other without Laughing, suggests with consummate skill the ease with which poor credulous human nature has been imposed on from time immemorial. Behind the scenes, these two accomplished hypocrites indulge to the full their contemptuous merriment, while the awe- stricken populace without, silently pondering the utterances of the Oracle, obedi- ently submits reason and will to these clever impostors, who, with only a change of garb and ritual, still number their followers by the thousands in our so-called enlightened age! “The Two Augurs,’”’ says Scott, in his ‘‘Gems of French Art,” * entitles Gérome to the highest place as satirist as well as painter.” The most brilliant epoch in Greek history furnishes the artist with a theme for his next canvas—Socrates Comes to Seek Alcibiades in the House of Aspasia. “Such [says Gautier] is the title of the second Greek picture of M. Géroéme. Alcibiades lounging on a couch beside Aspasia does not appear greatly inclined to follow his master, which can easily be conceived; philosophy is not worth as much as love—above all when Aspasia is the inspiration. A young slave, an of Xantippe, and on the threshold of the door an old woman smiles sardonically. artful, roguish beauty in transparent drapery, tries to keep back the spouse In the foreground a magnificent hound stretches himself out—the same dog whose tail Alcibiades cut to furnish matter for Athenian gossips. No specialist in animals could achieve its like. Placed as he is, he gains perhaps too much importance, but the dog of Alcibiades is himself a personage and not an accessory. The background represents an af/réum decorated with that antique elegance so well understood by the artist. It is a restoration, in every sense of the word, of an exquisite rarity, and evincing a knowledge that in no wise detracts from the effect. The figures stand out boldly against the architecture, luminous and gay with many colors, in which one can find no fault save perhaps that of too much richness. The Athenians reserved all their luxurious decoration for their public buildings, and their dwellings were very small ; but Aspasia, the renowned adviser and later the wife of Pericles, could well indulge in these splendors.” In the Phryne before the Areopagus, an equally celebrated and more dramatic historical episode is illustrated with inimitable power. Some critics of this period, jealous of the tide of admiration which surged in one direction, leaving their favorites with scanty appreciation, sought for some means to diminish the general enthusiasm, and could find nothing better than to assume an air of outraged modesty and loudly protest against these paintings as being at variance with the teachings of the Christian religion! Their attitude of offended virtue was so 96 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. visibly feigned and even ridiculous, and their position so altogether untenable, that they were soon silenced by the verdict of the best critics, which verdict Time has confirmed. Bergerat justly rebukes them for their prudery. He says: “Painter and admirer of Antique Greece, it would have seemed to Gérome, to ries of Alcibiades sentiments say the least, audacious to ascribe to the contempor which Christ did not preach to the world till a century after the death of Aspasia. He was not responsible for the fact that Athenian society admitted the courtesan as one of its fundamental elements and regarded her existence as one of their most serious principles of conservation. If we are interested in Socrates we can- not ignore Aspasia, and if we celebrate the justice of the Areopagus, we cannot forget that it acquitted Phryne on the simple revelation of her beauty—a national beauty, the remembrance and softening influences of which have survived for ages. The painter has well chosen the moment when Hyperides puts the crowning touch to his eloquent defense, and gains his cause by revealing to these worship- ers of the religion of pure beauty the matchless charms of the Athenian flute- layer, whose perfect form was reproduced by Apelles in his Venus Anadyomene and by Praxiteles in the famous golden statue of the Temple of Delphos. The charge of impiety and irreverence toward the gods, punishable by death, could never have been sustained in the face of the incomparable loveliness which, to SSor. hese superstitious heathens, was almost a proof of the divinity of its poss The instinctive gesture of the astonished Phryne, the varied emotions of the equally astonished tribunal, the triumphant glance of the successful orator, the floating drapery—every detail is rendered with a skill that leaves one at a loss for words that shall bring fitting tribute. The dramatic intensity of this scene is given with all the artist's characteristic power, which raises him so far above contemporary artists. Criticism has long since ceased to cavil at the subject, and the Phryne of Gérome takes rank with the finest creations of antiquity and surpass es them in dramatic grouping and emotional delineation. In an interesting and original volume entitled Sententie Artis, by Harry Quilter, M. A., a well-known English critic, we find the following comparison : nation to Mr. ——. Why? Because I “TI feel inclined to deny true imagi should do so to any man who imagined the body and forgot the soul; who gave me the face of antique life, but not the heart. It is not probable that if any of ar, we should think of palace marbles first and the living emperor afterward. To use a theatrical us had audience with Agrippa, or witnessed the death of Cz image, the actors in this artist’s paintings do not ‘take the stage.’ Compare his work in this respect with that of Géréme. In most of this painter's works, if we examine them carefully, it will be found that most of the effect depends upon the painting of suddenly arrested action. In nearly every picture there is a LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, 97 pause of action. We hold our breath, as it were, to see what is coming next. We can only point this out; like many another incident of art it cannot be proved to those who do not feel it.” The Fine Arts Quarterly Review, of London, referring to the Phryne says: “Tt is needless to insist on the consummate art-power which in such compositions attacks difficulties that lesser artists would simply evade. A hand for drawing, an eye for both ideal beauty and indi- vidual character, together with thorough technical knowledge, are proved in this work.” And Claretie writes: ‘‘In the smallest picture, in the least of his draw- ings, Géréme shows the hand of the master. Certain studies taken from Nature for his Phryne would form an incomparable frieze for the cabinet of an amateur, as finished as any antique.” It was after the Salon of 1861 that our : artist, wearied by his immense efforts, and haunted, waking and sleeping, by visions from the enchanted ‘‘land of the sun,” yielded to his passion for travel and organized a party which, under his intrepid leadership, penetrated far into the then little known regions of the ‘Beret Syrian Desert. His notes furnish us with a condensed but graphic account of this journey, revealing anew his keen powers of observation and reflection in regard to both physical and mental phenomena. He writes: “About this time I undertook another journey to the Orient—to Judea, Egypt, and Syria. We were seventeen days crossing the Desert of S the first time that I had ventured into the desert. Our a. It was aravan was well organ- ized, though not very large. We had supplied ourselves carefully with every- thing necessary to our material stence, above all with Nile water, a precaution all the more important since we took with us four horses, and we were obliged to load the water these animals were to consume, on the backs of the camels ; twenty-four liters a day, multiplied by seventeen, madd 408 liters. Happily at El-Arich, the last Egyptian station, there was a well where travelers could renew their supply. In very long crossings, it is impossible to take horses ; besides, camels are admirably convenient, since one is not obliged to occupy one’s self so seriously with their food and drink. Once arrived at the encampment, N LEON GEROME. 98 LIKE AND WORKS OF JEz they are loosed, and they instantly set off in search of both. They always find a certain fleshy plant, with narrow leaves, the interior of which contains a certain humidity, and which serve at the same time as food and drink. They can there- fore make several long marches without being watered, but they drink deep when they find opportunity. Their spongy feet are admirably constructed for the ielding soil. They spread them over the sand and are thus enabled to sustain ta ht, while the horses and the asses sometimes sink in up to their heir heavy wei knees. The camel is truly a ship in this desert sea. “Nothing could be more agreeable, more poetic, than our encampments in this solitude, with its added charm of novelty and the unknown. Although fatigued by long marches in the full blaze of the sun, | began my work with ardor as soon as the halting-place was reached ; but alas! how many things | was forced to leave behind, only a bare memory of which I could take away—I who prefer three touches of color on a canvas to the most vivid of memories ! But one must always press forward and let one’s regrets ride en croupe / “In spite of the charm of this desert life, 1am bound to say that at the end of a certain number of days, when one catches the first glimpse of cultivated nlains, when one meets again one’s fellow-men, one has a very sweet sensation ; and the sight of a green prairie—really green—rejoices one amazingly. Approach- ing in the direction of Gaza, we passed suddenly from utter barrenness to a fertile country ; there were pomegranates in blossom, orange, lemon, and palm trees ; but no gates! Samson had not we found again life and labor in all its phases returned ! “Several leagues from Jerusalem we pitched our tent, for it was already late, and we wished to start very early the next day. By daybreak we were en route, but were suddenly assailed by the most terrible storm I have ever in my life endured. At a turning in the road (our road was the bed of a torrent !) a gust of wind almost overturned my horse and me, and one of my comrades, who, fatigued by riding, was trying to get on better afoot, was forced from time to time to take off his riding-boots and empty them, for the water, running in at his collar, literally filled them. “On our arrival, the tempest was still raging and it was impossible to pitch the tents on account of the violence of the wind. For want of more suitable refuge, we hastened in to Saint-Sépulcre, in a horrible state, wet to the skin and chilled with the cold. But we forgot everything before the strange- ness of the spectacle which met our ey It was Good Friday, and all was in a state of preparation for the Easter Festival. Pilgrims from all four corners of the earth were there gathered, nay, jammed together; some sing- ing in procession, others silent in prayer; others still, having constructed rude lodgings with planks, between the columns, were swarming there with their wives and children ; for a certain curious tradition guarantees a peculiar blessing from God upon children conceived in these holy surroundings. We elbowed Armenians, Greeks, Copts, Rus all Christian sects who came there, not only to adore and supplicate the Most High, but also, and above all, to declare that they evxecrated each ans, Roman Catholics—in a word, LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 99 other / For in truth it is seldom that these feasts pass by without blood being shed upon the flagstones of the Temple, and two or three corpses being scattered on the ground! And then the Turkish regiment that mounts guard, fully armed, cr s bayonets and clears out the place! In order to avoid this scan- dal, each of the faithful of late years is searched at the door and relieved of his knife and any other offensive weapon, so that now these devotees of the Christian religion are forced to fall back on insults, hustlings, and knockdown blows with the fist! I was nearly strangled in one of these affrays, which I found only moderately attractive; for | was not of the number (which really was not small) who, old and decrepit, make long journeys in order to die at Jeru- salem and be interred on the banks of the Kedron. Those who have religious sentiments, and wish to preserve them unsullied, will do well not to visit the Holy Sepulcher at this time. “The character of the country is desolate—stones everywhere, scanty vege- tation, olive trees of rickety shapes twisted by the tempest; but it is not a commonplace country. When one has once seen it, one can never forget it. The city has also its own p Easter season, gloomy and si six days is sufficient to make (suburbs) of Jerusalem ; every banks of the Jordan, above a the spots much frequented by onack, stopping at Baalbec, wit imposing grandeur, but whose so formidable that one wonc possessed, to be able to bring 1ysiognomy: swarming and very agitated at the ent at any other time. An excursion of five or the tour of Judea, which is really the danlieue where mournfulness and barrenness, even on the 1 on the shores of the Dead Sea, a pool lying in ow ground, in a heavy, burning atmosphere. We passed Lake Tiberias, one of Jesus; and made long stretches, now on horse- ain the inclosure or rather the ruins of the city, of style denotes an epoch of decadence. The most curious point there is a very ancient wall, each stone of which has proportions ers what machinery the Titans of that period these huge blocks from the quarry. “Arrival at Damascus after a two days’ march. It was the crown and end of our journey, as Cairo had be remarkable cities of the Orient the impure breath of Europe. en the beginning. Damascus! Cairo! the most ; those which have remained longest untainted by I speak of the ‘long ago,’ for since then Cairo has been disfigured, and this Khedive, who has laid his sacrilegious hand on these relics, will have a terrible account to render to Allah! “T worked but little at D. amascus, for I was very fatigued by the journey. In midsummer the heat was tropical, and so much the more insupportable, in that the city is surrounded by mountains covered with immense trees, which stop the circulation of the air, and one suffers much during the warm season in spite of the numerous brooks that furrow the ground in every direction. I was present at a very curious Jewish feast given by a rich banker, where a large number of young women were smoking their zr; hiléhs in astonishingly décolleté costumes, seated on rich divans in immense halls of very elegant architecture. ‘Before closing these notes I want to tell you of a touching episode which I witnessed at Jerusalem. Our cook met one of his friends, also a cook, in the ser- vice of some travelers who were encamped close beside us. This friend, who was 100 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. still young, had quitted his home in Bagdad two years before, leaving his old mother there alone. At the end of this time, the poor woman could no longer overcome the longing to see her child. She set off without money, without resources, on foot, attaching herself to the different caravans she met, living on charity. And thus she made numerous and painful journey But where shall she look, for she is absolutely ignorant of his whereabouts. Is he in Egypt or Syria or Greece; in Turkey or in Arabia? In Europe, Asia, or Africa? She knows not; but, sustained by love, she walks on !— seeking her son. and still she walks on. Allah had pity on her and permitted her to meet her well-beloved son at Jeru- salem.” On these same notes, hastily jotted down by the artist as ‘‘ reminders,” Ber- gerat comments as follows D “Their autobiographical interest is thrown into the shade, so to speak, by their ora physiological value, and for him who knows how to read and judge a man by his style, no portrait could more xactly reveal the personality of Géréme than these few pages of pen sketches. Incisive clearness of vision contends here with the taste dominant in the character ; and these are the two master qualities of the painter. As he writes, he paints; the phi osophy of art is the same. Remark how his eye is caught instantly by the decisive note of objects or scenes, that he subordinates surrounding details, and that his thorough education as a painter aids him to select at a glance the desired effect out of many.” The return voyage was saddened by the death of one of their little band, Duhais, who was sorrowfully interred at Trieste. This long journey of eight months was followed in January, 1862, by the marriage of Géréme to the beautiful daughter of Monsieur Goupil, the well-known head of the most impor- tant art-publishing house in the world. After the wedding-journey of two months in Italy, they returned to the charming hotel which Gérome had con- structed on the Rue de Bruxelles, which now forms a part of their present residence on the Boulevard de Clichy. In his artistic and commodious home the master often recalls with a smile the little servant’s chamber under the roof in the Rue St. Martin, which he occupied as a poor student when he first came LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 101 to Paris. He changed afterward to an old house in the Rue de l’Ancienne Comédie,—the former site of the Théatre Francais,—where he obtained a more comfortable room directly opposite the old Café Procop, so much frequented by Voltaire. He was finally able to take a tiny, obscure atelier, but still an atelier of his own, in the Rue de Sévres, where he painted the famous Combat de Cogs. The artist who occupied this memorable studio afterward, meeting Géréme one day, assailed him with a flood of questions as to how he had been ‘‘able to exist in that black, gloomy, frightful hole!” The master, genuinely surprised, replied, “T did not have time to notice all that! It was gay enough for me, for I remember we laughed and sang a great deal!” From this dark little studio he went to the Rue de Fleurus, where several of his comrades came to live with him, among them Hamon, Picou, and Schoenwerk the sculptor. From there to the Rue Duguay-Trouin, then surrounded by open fields, and where his drawing-room was the street! for there he received all his visitors when it was too dark to work and he could not afford lights. It was about this time that he was playfully accused of living “like a Sybarite’—a good-natured sarcasm which has been taken aw grand sériewx by several critics! The father of the painter Toulmouche, one of his best friends, finally constructed an atelier for him in the Rue Notre Dame des Champs, which he occupied until his marriage, and where he painted many of his great pictures. Ménard gives us a graphic description of life in this gay atelier, an invitation to which was eagerly sought for. “M. Gérome’s studio has always been frequented by a great number of artists and men of letters. When he was living in his doi/e-d-thé (the name given by painters to a sort of Japanese house in which was his studio), he was the center of a large group of young men who surrounded him with gayety. In the evenings there were improvised fétes in which wit and humor made up for the absence of ceremony, The studio was further enlivened by an enormous monkey, whose only fault was a determination to paint like all those about him; this, however, was serious, as he was not always satisfied with painting upon his own pictures, but sometimes daubed over the works of other artists! Then there was a burst of indignation, but the saucy monkey contrived always to get forgiven on account of his thousand tricks and farces, and to get the laugh on his own side. There were several studios for painters in the same house, which, moreover, was near the Luxembourg, a quarter where artists congregate in great numbers. As groups of painters are always formed by a sympathy in tendencies, the friends of M. Gérome were generally little inclined toward realistic innovations. There had been some noise made about some large pictures by M. Gustave Courbet, which, not without merit, somewhat resembled caricatures, and certain theorists exalted very loudly the manner of the painter. Naturally, a different opinion prevailed amongst M. Géréme’s fr ends, and this led to the representation of a parody ‘de circonstance,’ acted in the studio, and in which a certain ‘ Réaliste’ exposes his doctrine in these words : 102 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME ‘“Paire vrai,—ce nest rien pour étre réaliste ; Cest faire /aid qu'il faut! or, Monsieur, sil vous plait, Tout ce que je dessine est horriblement laid ! Ma peinture est affreuse, et pour qu'elle soit vraie, J’en arrache le beau, comme on fait de l’ivraie! Jaime les teints terreux, et les nez de carton, Les fillettes avec de la barbe au menton, Les trognes de tarasque et de coque-cigrues, Les durillons, les cors aux pieds, et les verrues ! Voila le vrai /” “This criticism of realistic doctrines might be somewhat sharp, but it was an answer to the sarcasms continually thrown from the opposite camp upon the artists who drew most of their subjects from antiquity.” Ménard’s mention of the monkey, which was Géréme’s property and_ his especial pet, reminds us of a comical story that we have from the artist's own lips. Jacques was an unusually bright specimen and his master was indefatigable in training him, especially in regard to his manners ‘‘at table,” where he was often the gravest of the little company. He could not be cured, however, of certain marauding tendencies, and soon Géréme was obliged to pay damages in the neighborhood for uprooted flowers, broken windows, and like mischief. A collar and chain thenceforth kept M. Jacques indoors and in order. One day, having succeeded in breaking his fetters, he made his way slyly through the open sky- light into the street. His absence was not remarked, till his empty chair at the & noonday déeuwner called attention to the fact that he was doubtless ev rouwfe for further costly adventures. Hastily clapping on a hat, Gérome rushed out in pursuit, inquiring of every one he met, news of his fugitive property. He traced him as far as one of the Grands Boulevards, and there, on turning a corner, he discovered a crowd gathered in front of the immense glass window of a fashionable restaurant. Naturally gravitating in that direction, his astonished ly seated at a table where a (/éfe-a-téte breakfast was in progress, regardless of the eyes beheld M. Jacques, with napkin decorously tucked into his collar, grav io energetic protests of the gentleman, or the dismayed shrinking of his fair companion—and resenting by a furious chattering any attempt on the part of the convulsed garcons to remove him from his comfortable seat! Repressing his merriment by a strong effort, Géroéme entered the ca/é, and courteously apol- ogizing for the intrusion of his ‘‘familiar,” captured the uninvited guest, who meekly submitted to be borne away amid the cheers and bravos of the amused spectators ! In spite of the hilarity that enlivened this period of his life, the artist’s habits of steady application were too well confirmed to be affected to the detriment of ee LIFE AND WORKS OF JE N LLON GEROME, 103 his work, and in his more luxurious quarters in the Boulevard de Clichy he did not alter his rigid rule of early rising and almost uninterrupted labor till sundown. Connoisseurs, and, indeed, the general public, had learned to look eagerly for Gérome'’s exhibit at the Salon, confident of finding the wherewithal to satisfy eye and heart—the senses and the imagination. The Salon of 1863 was no exception to the rule. Varnishing Day beheld a delighted throng almost equally divided before four canvases, passing from one to the other with ever-increasing admiration for the infinite versatility and flawless execution more and more apparent at each exhibition. Perhaps the longest pause was made before the Prisoner on the Nile, one of his best known Oriental souvenirs. The London Atheneum characterizes it as ‘a marvelous work, one of the most poetical we me know of and a noble example of execution,” and another writer in the review adds, ‘‘ The picture in question is so brilliant and solid that its illusion is almost complete, and that result is obtained without the sacrifice of any noble qualities to mere imitation.” Maxime Du Camp says “The scene takes place in Upper Egypt, on the Nile, not far from the village of Luxor, with the imposing silhouette of the Palace of Amenophis stretching along the horizon. In several strokes of the brush M. Géroéme has shown perfectly, to those capable of understanding, the state of Egypt, where a dreamy, gentle, submissive race is tortured daily by its ancient conquerors, more uncivil- ized, more vicious, and less intelligent than the vanquished.” Charles Blane gives a more detailed description of it : “The Prisoner is a little masterpiece. Bound, and lying crosswise in an Egyptian bark, the captive is borne on the Nile to his final destiny—which doubtless is decapitation by the saber. U ed forward by two oarsmen, one of whom is a strong-armed Nubian, the craft flies like an arrow over the placid Waters in the twilight. over his vengeance, and The master, girdled with poniards and pistols, broods ooks steadily before him with half-closed eyes, a glance of cruel joy flashing from beneath the long lashes that veil them. It reminds me of Richelieu dragging Cinq-Mar off to the gallows in a boat on the Rhone. Meanwhile, a youth with languishing glance and equivocal mien, an effemin- ate stripling of low degree, sings, while thrumming his mandolin, as if chanting by order a death-song in mockery of the prisoner's sufferings. The heavens are cloudless ; nature calm and happy ; the Pharaonic temples embellish the distant banks of the stream and eternal silhouettes. Yes, this picture is a masterpiece. changed in it—absolute Philip Gilbert Hamerton bears eloquent witness, in the Fine Arts Quarterly Keview of London, to the manifold power of the master. He says trace on the still, clear evening sky their solemn and othing should be y nothing ; ne varietur.”’ 104 LIFE AND WORKS OF J. LEON GEROME. “Here is a Frenchman who seems to have all the good of English Pre- Raphaelism with none of its extravagance. He is as minute as Holman Hunt himself, omitting absolutely nothing that can be told in paint; yet his detail, however marvelously studied, is always kept perfectly subordinate to the main > with an purpose. His picture of the Prisoner represents a boat on the Ni unlucky prisoner in it bound hand and foot. The rowers are a wonderful study, their muscular shoulders and arms wrought out to the utmost, even down to the swelling sinews of the wrist, whose strong cords conduct the power of the arms and chest down to the hands that grasp the oar. There is so much masterly drawing in every bit of this work, such perfect care, such loyalty to fact, that you cannot find one thoughtless touch in it. The distant shore of the Nile is a lesson for a landscape painter; the polished ripple in the calm water, and the long drawn reflections are full of delicate truth; the sky right in color and painted, it seems, at y of this once. A curious proper picture, and which goes far to prove its consummate truth, is that the spectator has no idea at first that it is minute work, for the details, being modest and in their right places, do not continu- s are too much in the ally cry aloud ‘See what a multitude we are!’ as detai habit of doing in England. After gazing at the picture for five minutes we begin to discover that it is full of minute facts, which we had not seen; and if we go to the picture every day for a week, we shall always find something new in it.” Timbal takes up the theme as follows: “Tt has been said that Géréme contents himself with seizing on the wing a picturesque scene; that he transfers it to the canvas without commentary, without seeking to add any other attraction than that of a vigorously faithful transcription. However, it would seem that the author of the Duel of Pierrot can overleap, when he pleases, the limits within which he often voluntarily con- fines himself, and even when he remains a simple painter of manners and customs, he succeeds still in being something more. One evening, walking on GRAND BATHS AT BROWS 1885 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 105 the banks of the Nile in the twilight, he was looking at a boat drifting down the tiver over the silvery, trembling wavelets. Seated in the prow, an Arnaut was singing to the stars, accompanying himself on the gwz/a. Was not the theme sufficient? The painter, however, with the interior eye of his imagination, beheld there an actor who would double the interest ; on the rower’s bench he extended a poor slave, his hands and feet closely confined by fetters. Blow, balmy breeze ! thou passest over meadows the prisoner never more shall tread ; shine, O light of heaven! on these eyes soon to close forever; and thou, exe- cutioner, insult thy victim by voice and gesture! Here are contrasts which more than one painter could render with equally skillful brush, but the heart of a poet alone will discover them, and without having to owe a debt of gratitude to the chance which has furnished them !” The assertion of Maxime Du Camp, that, to be successful, Géréme ‘‘ must have seen with his own eyes,” that ‘‘ he imagines very badly but remembers very well,” is silently but effectually refuted by dozens of poetical conceptions, among them this picture of the Prisoner, which was re-exposed in 1867. Gérome makes characteristic mention of it in his notes: ‘‘The Prisoner (now in the Museum at Nantes) had a universal success, being admired by both connoisseurs and idiots!” In The Comedians, the artist has revived for us a scene from the earliest periods of dramatic art—the trying on of masks representing every possible phase of emotion, the use of which preceded the cultivation of facial expression on the part of the players themselves. Two actors are critically regarding the effect of a most lugubrious mask which one of their con/fréres is holding before his placid countenance. The shelves of this curious antique green-room are heaped with these different canvas visages, on which all the passions of the soul seem to be petrified. Truly Géréme can make not only his public but his actors literally laugh and weep at will! The drawing, coloring, pose, and grouping of details, which never detract from the breadth of style, are carried to a degree of perfection only attainable by a master mind and hand. Of the Turkish Butcher at Jerusalem, a marvel of color and finish, which was also re-exhibited in 1867, Gautier writes : “Here is a youth with charming, melancholy, dreamy mien, leaning idly against the wall of his stall, where the different meats are suspended from hooks. In a circle, at his feet, lie the heads of his victims, sheep and goats, who seem to regard him mournfully from the depths of their glassy eyes. The butcher is a genuine fatalist—he pays no attention to these mute reproaches ; he kills with- out cruelty, just as he would do anything else, and would no doubt as calmly cut the throat of a man as of a sheep. Surrounded by these poor dead animals, he abandons himself to a £ief, in which he beholds the visions of the Thousand and One Nights. Nothing could transport one more vividly to the Orient than this little picture, which could be covered by one’s hand.” 106 LIF. N GEROME, E AND WORKS OF JEAN L. Molitre Breakfasting with Louis XIV., the closing picture of this quartette, as skillful in treatment as it is varied in incident, gives us one of those scenes that reveal Géréme’s peculiar power of seizing and expressing the finest sances of emotion. The ironical doxhomie of the king as he administers this stinging rebuke to the snobbish prejudices of his favorites; their surprise and wrath, poorly concealed by the majority under an obsequious deference, and openly displayed by the outraged pillar of the Church ; the mingled dignity, embarr. ment, and enjoyment of the guest, who can so thoroughly appreciate the humor of the situation,—piquant enough to have been taken from one of his own inimitable comedies,—all is rendered with matchless ability. Hamerton writes: “The picture of Moliére at the court of Louis XIV. is an astonishing piece of work ; so thoughtful, graceful, and refined in conception, so exquisitely perfect in execution. The incident is that famous one when the king gave a lesson to his proud courtiers by inviting Moliére to eat at his own table, since they considered him unfit for theirs. Perhaps Louis was the more honored of the two when they sat thus together! but the courtiers did not think so. In their view, the king had lost all sense of dignity when he let that playwright eat with him. Every face is full of expression, the king’s beaming with malicious enjoyment at the sen- sation he has just created ; Moliére, already seated, is bending modestly forward, with his two-pronged fork in his hand, to attack the viands in obedience to the royal will. The pale bishop in the corner, with the violet vestments, is especially indignant, his face white with anger and full of scorn; but the king is not ina humor to be frightened by anybody’s cross looks just now. As to the execution, it is enough to say that everything is honestly drawn, down to the embroidery on the stockings, with firmness and accuracy, yet no undue emphasis. Every detail is treated patiently and respectfully. There is another picture of precisely the same incident by a clever painter, M. Leman. His interpretation is lively and skillful, but a careful comparison of the two pictures only makes Géréme’s great quality more conspicuous. That quality is best expressed by the French word distinction. It is more than refinement; it is consummate grace joined to ge. perfect knowled Gérome’s notes barely record the appearance of these four pictures, which created so much enthusiasm, and also mention without comment the exhibition at the Salon of 1864 of a portrait of a friend, M. A. T., and Z’Admée, an Oriental scene, at that epoch more striking from its novelty, but since become familiar to the world who thronged to the late Universal Exposition of 1880, and watched with amazement the strange contortions of the Khedive’s ballet de 1’ Opéra, who came to Paris to capture the plaudits and the gold of the assembled nations. Every one who has seen this singular exotic dance can bear witness to the absolute verity of the painter's canvas. Gautier writes : LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 107 “There is always a crowd before the 4/mée of M. Gérome, a curious picture which is like a corner of the Orient in a frame. In one of those smoky hovels, where one takes coffee, squatted on rush mats, an 4/mée is dancing before some Albanians with their strange costumes and fierce mien. Dwellers in the Orient have very peculiar ideas in regard to dancing; the sight of a well-turned limb and ankle, or gauzy skirts raised by a dexterous movement of the foot—all this would seem to them the height of extravagance and immodesty; but provided that the gold-spangled slipper never leaves the ground, they permit the most voluptuous undulations and poses of the body, sensuous movements of the arms, and waving of silken scarfs, languishing glances, and the head rolling from one shoulder to the other as if intoxicated with love. This Terpsichore, with her eyelashes stained by &’hol/, and her nails reddened by henna, has nothing in common, as one perceives, with the Terpsichore of the opera. The Admée of M. Gérome is executing one of these dances. Her vest of yellow satin incloses her form like an antique ces¢ws, her trousers of a pale rose-mauve taffetas, wide and pleated like a skirt, envelop her from waist to ankle. She advances by imper- ceptible displacements of the feet, undulating the serpentine lines of her body, her head lying on her shoulder like a turning dervish in an ecstasy, and keeping time by a nervous jingle of her crofa/es to the chant which the musicians, seated in the shadow, are droning out to the accompaniment of the rebeb, the tarbouka, sh’s flute. The Albanians, with their belts bristling with a perfect and a der arsenal of pistols, fandjars, and vataghans, and wearing on their heads caffiéhs, whose cords and tassels half conceal their countenances, look at her fixedly, as impassible as kites watching a dove, while a negro, smiling from ear to ear, abandons himself to his delight and applauds the dancer while marking time for her. In the background we perceive the sawadji, occupied with his stove; at the left, through the open door, we have a glimpse of Cairo, the blue of the sky gleaming oddly through the fine carving of the moucharabys. “We know to what a point the ethnographic sense is developed in M. Géréme. No artist seizes as well as he the typical accent of races, the local character of costumes, the exotic variety of accessories. With respect to all these points he exhibits an intimate and penetrating accuracy, of which one could have no doubt, even were one unacquainted with the countries represented by the artist-traveler. The d/mée is of an astonishing truthfulness in point of type, pose, and attire. Her bracelets, her strings of sequins, her gold-embossed girdle, display the coquettish savagery of Arabic adornment. The toilet is complete ; nothing is wanting, not even the carmine on the nails, the black line under the , and the little blue tattooing on the chin. Even in this genre picture, one divines the painter of history by the science of the drawing, the purity of style, and the masterly taste which presides over the slightest details.” The Salon of 1865 was rich in the elaboration of several other sketches taken on the last journey through Egypt and Syria, notably the Praver in the Desert, which Bergerat justly ranks among ‘‘the purest and loveliest gems in his superb Oriental casket.” No description can possibly convey more than a shadow of the 108 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. beauty of this scene. Up from the east comes a seemingly interminable caravan, reluctantly quitting the coolness of mountain passes to face the glare of the open desert and the level but still powerful rays of the setting sun. Here is no muezzin to warn the faithful that the hour for prayer has come! yet the warlike eader, ever mindful of his oft-repeated duty, has thrown himself from his horse, who turns quietly to nibble at a tuft of grass, while his master, lacking the requisite carpet, unfastens his mantle and spreads it upon the burning sand. Then removing his sandals, and turning toward the city of Mahomet, he bends ais head and with humble reverence calls upon the name of Allah and his >. rophet. His lance, carelessly thrust into the ground, points like a minaret to pe he misty blue heavens and serves as guide to the horsemen who are urging es heir weary steeds over the plain toward the hill in the foreground, while the patient camels move slowly and heavily forward over the endless reaches of white sand which extend to the foot of the dimly outlined range of mountains in he background. In spite of the color and movement, here is the same intense oO tillness, the overwhelming loneliness, the same penetrating sense of distance and space, of poetry and mystery, which takes possession of every one who udies Gérome n pictures of the desert. Add to this a religious feeling ct 1oroughly appreciated and reflected by the painter, and we have one of his most expressive compositions in this gewre. We almost feel that we are travel- ing with him through this Syrian wilderness, which he faintly outlined for us in the notes we have quoted. In the Muezzin—at Night, which the Atheneum praises for its ‘‘tone, softnes , solidity, and admirable expression,” there is the same strong, genuine religious feeling. Here too are loneliness and space; but it is the loneliness of the night, which intensifies all emotion, veils all defects, and reveals beauties hidden by the midday glare; and space, through which the reverent soul can upreach past unknown worlds and touch the Infinite. The unquestioning faith of the Moslem, as well as the picturesque contour of his postures while at worship, deeply impressed our artist and became a favorite theme. In Praver on the House-top, he gives us another phase almost as beautiful as those we have described. Gautier says: “In this Prayer M. Géréme has not needed to exert much effort to make a delicious picture. It is evening; the gold of the sunset meeting the twilight azure, produces one of those greenish blues, like the blue of the turquoise, of a delicate and rare tone. The moon faintly outlines its silver crescent, and the minarets, tapering like masts of ivory, send out from their high balconies the call of the muezzin, ‘El salam alek, aleikoum el salam!’ A vague, soft light falls upon the terraces of the whitewashed houses, where the believers, standing £; kneeling, or with their foreheads bowed upon their carpet, recite their prayers THE SLAVE-MARKET, LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. iG in the solemn and chant the glory of Allah,—the eternal, solitary, and only one, attitudes of Oriental devotion which the artist excels in rendering. The impres ion made by this little canvas is profoundly religious. After the work, the heat, and the dissipation of the day, the evening descends, bringing to souls and to Nature, calm, freshness, and serenity. Islam, filled with faith, confides itself to God for the coming night.” In the Arnaut, Smoking, we have a picturesque specimen of an Albanian taking his ease on a wide divan as he lazily pulls away at his narghiléh, having kicked off his savates, and drawn up his feet under his snow-white /wsfanelle. The light filters through the lattice-work of the moucharabiéh and touches up the long mustachios and swarthy breast, the jeweled handle of the kandjar thrust into his sash, and the multicolored embroidery of the cushion on which he rests his elbow. It is a picture full of rich and harmonious tones, Side by side with these glimpses of far-away and unique races seen in their native surroundings, we find another of these strange Eastern types transplanted into the very center of modern civilization, and presenting one of the strongest pos a painter's brush. The Imperial choice fell upon Géréme to render this ible contrasts, as to costume and manner, that history ever furnished for extraordinary scene, and, little as it was to his liking, he has achieved a success where almost any other artist would have been obliged to chronicle a failure. Gautier describes this canvas as follows : “The Reception of the Siamese Ambassadors at the Palace of Fontainebleau, of M. Gérome, keenly piques the curiosity of the visitors to the Salon, and one is forced to wait one’s turn to see it. Indeed, it is a strange spectacle, these ambassadors crawling on all fours over the carpet toward the throne. M. Gérome was qualified above all others to depict this singular scene; he has a profound knowledge of exotic races, and a marvelous grasp of their peculiarities and dispositions. Picturesque ethnography is of very recent date, and is one of the modern conquests of art. “When the old masters had foreign subjects to paint, they contented themselves with types of pure fantasy, and local color did not trouble them in the slightest degree. These deceptions are no longer admissible in our time of exact information and easy travel. Nothing can be more fantastic than this procession of swarthy creatures, robed in costumes glittering with gold and embroideries, which advances on hands and knees, in postures impossible to European articulations, toward the Emperor and Empress, whose kind gravity is maintained despite the oddity of the spectacle. On the steps of the throne are deposited imperial parasols, stuffs interwoven with gold, delicate foreign jewelry, and all the fanciful luxury of the extreme Orient. One cannot sufficiently appreciate the exquisite care and exactne with which the artist has rendered the figures, costumes, and jewels of the strange embassy. In front is a youth with shaven head, complexion of gold, and eyes like black diamonds, who is LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON G creeping along so gracefully, and lifts his head with so pleasure to look at him. has disguised himself like a grotesque bit of Chinese “Beside the carpet which is being traversed by the these batrachian attitudes are the great personages of th the Chdteau—standing erect, calm, grave, disguising a each face being perfectly recognizab At the ot corner near the edge of the canvas, the artist, a necess official seriousness to the Empress are grouped near the throne. COME. droll an air, that it is a One would say it was a Cupid, who, through caprice, oorcelain. Siamese notabilities in e court, the familiars of half-smile under their e. The maids of honor her end of the hall, ina ry witness of the scene, The frescoes of Prima- ticcio, discreetly subdued to give more value to the leading motives, are visible in the half-shadow of the background, which t has represented himself as standing next to Meissonier. hey people with their vague sil- It would be difficult to treat this quaint subject more skillfully than M. Gérome has done. If the glittering and gilc with their Asiatic richness, make the familiar European attire appear insignifi- cant, the blame must not be laid on the artist’s palette. The a of houettes. ed costumes of the ambassadors, oruptnes contrast was inevitable. As Gautier remarks, all of these officials that surround Napoleon III. and the Empr Eugénie iar with the are easily to be recognized by any one fami entourage of the court at this epoch; but the difficulty under which Géréme labored in painting these portraits can scarcely be conceived by the uninitiated. It is partly illustrated by the following anecdote, related by Timbal, for the absolute verity of which we have heard the master vouch more than once. “One day, one of the personages to whom was assigned the honor of fig- of the Ambassadors, arrived very much later than the hour “Impossible to have you pose to-day,’ said the artist, carelessness and the loss of time; uring in the picture indicated by the painter. a trifle vexed at this ‘I am expecting the Duke of P——; he will be here at three o'clock, and it is now ten minutes of three.’ ‘Oh, well!’ replied the delinquent, with nonchalance, ‘you have ten After that, minutes ! work quickly, for I shall not be able to come again!’ accuse portraits of lying or the painters of want of fidelity or skill The same steady, quiet work went on during this year and the next, pro- ducing for the Salon of 1866 three canvases, the most important of which, Cleopatra and Cesar, has achieved a world-wide renown. A paragraph from *Cleo- oat and arrived by night before the Palace of Plutarch’s Life of Cesar furnishes the key to this marvelous picture : patra embarked in a little b As she could n Alexandria. ot enter without being recognized, she wrapped odorus bound with a thong, and which he caused This herself in a carpet which Apol to be conveyed into the presence of Czesar by the very door of the palace. tuse of Cleopatra, it is said, was the first bait by which Cesar was taken.’ The exquisite form of Cleopatra, rising from the folds of the heavy rug LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. Ug like Venus from the billows of the sea, is brought into strong relief against the swarthy skin of the slave who has borne in on his sturdy shoulders this living freight of fragrant beauty. An appealing glance from the mournful eyes of Egypt’s vanquished Queen meets the astonished gaze of Caesar, as he lifts his head from the manuscript he is perusing—and all is said! The picture is fraught with suggestion, fascinating the eye that loves to linger over beautiful contours, and, still more, one that can read between these eloquent lines. This canvas was also exhibited in 1871 at the Royal Academy in London, of which Géréme was made an Honorary Member. We have already alluded to the Door of the Mosque El-Assaneyn, where Salek-Kachef exposed the heads of the rebel beys he had put to death, which appeared also in 1866. Gérome here indulged his love of fun by giving to several of these heads the features of some well-known Parisians who had not made themselves particularly agree- able to him! A prominent critic teproached him for his frivolity, y but the joke was hugely enjoyed by the public and especially by his comrades, who thoroughly appreciated this good-humored and artistic revenge. This canvas was also re-exposed in 1867. There are more than four hundred of these mosques at Cairo, this one of Hassan, or El-Assaneyn, or El-Hacanin, as it is indifferently called, being the largest and most elaborate. Lenoir, who visited it for the first time with Géréme, refers to it as follows: “The mosque is, far excellence, the rendezvous of prayer; according to its importance it corresponds to our cathedrals or to the simple country church. The minaret is its steeple, from whence the muezzin summons all the faithful to prayer by the languorous chanting of several verses from the Koran. ‘The always elegant cupola of these edifices corresponds to the site of the tomb of the caliph, sultan, or rich personage who has constructed the building. Varying a little in their interior arrangement, they are nearly all constructed in the same manner: a large, square court with its peristyle, in the center of which is the pool for ablutions ; in the sanctuary, called the mihrab,—a sort of richly ornamented recess whose Gothic niche is invariably turned toward Mecca,—stands the menber or preacher’s chair, which is often a real chefd’euvre of sculpture and decoration. The Mosque of the Mameluke Sultan Hassan dominates the entire city of Cairo ; by its colossal proportions and absolutely pure Arabic style, it is undoubtedly the 114 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. most beautiful mosque in the whole Orient; neither St. Sophia, nor all the massive edifices of Constantinople, can be compared to it. It is situated in front of the citadel on the Place Roumeliéh. A door, the height of the building, leads into it from a lateral street which runs into the Place. Marbles of every shade, connected by arches, and ornaments of bronze set off the elegance of this principal entrance. Thousands of stalactites, forming niches, stretch up half the entire height and gracefully melt away where crossbeams of carved wood sustain a wondrous collection of lamps of glass and ostrich eggs, richly colored. “We go up several steps and then descend several others, finding ourselves on the same level in a long gallery adorned with stone benches on either side. It is the antechamber of the mosque; at the extremity of the imposing hall are stationed cawas and guards. This mysterious and terrible prelude only renders more striking the marvelous spectacle which confronts one immediately; an immense court, in the form of a Greek cross, is occupied in the center by a most picturesque Saracen structure. Sustained by columns of porphyry, and sur- mounted by a brilliantly decorated cupola, this little octagon pavilion serves only to shelter the pool for ablutions. Opposite the entrance a colossal arch forms a single vault, a smaller repetition of which is indicated on the other side of the court; it is the sanctuary, erected one step higher than the rest of the edifice. At the ends of long chains, thousands of lamps seem to descend from heaven and present from afar the appearance of a shower, or a trellis suspended in space. At the bottom, and always turned toward Mecca, is the mhraé, richly ornamented with precious mosaics, paintings, and arabesques. “The preacher's chair is equally a masterpiece of sculpture. Green, red, and yellow flags brought back from Mecca, form trophies of brilliant colors on each side. Innumerable votive offerings are covered with a medley of objects and inscriptions. On each side, large square platforms, less high than the menéer, serve as stalls for the ulémas and young dervishes, for whom these places are exclusively reserved. Finally, mattings and rich carpets cover the remainder of the marble pavement and preserve the feet of the faithful from contact with its glacial surface. The colors which preponderate in the general ornamentation of mosques are green and red, agreeably alternated in arabesques and many other designs. The religious inscriptions are generally painted in blue or golden characters, on immense boards, with a green background. When mew, this superb mosque could certainly not have possessed the mysterious poetry it has to-day ; and, without being a lover of uncleanliness, I believe that time alone can blend so marvelously these colors which originally must have been very glaring. “At the right of the mzhrad, a little low door, concealed by a black curtain embroidered with gold, gives access to the immense chamber which corresponds to the exterior cupola. It is here where the tomb of the Sultan Hassan is placed ; a grating of forged iron and a second barrier of painted wood isolate this square stone from the rest of the hall, which is in a most complete state of nudity and decay. Looking up into the air, one is terrified by the height of the vault. Enormous stalactites garnish the angles to the point where the Gothic form of the dome commences to accentuate itself, giving to this cupola the aspect of an LTk AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 115 immense hive, where the owls have installed a clamorous colony. Every day a part of these wooden decorations and massive sculptures detaches itself and falls with a crash. Far from trying to prevent this danger, the Arabs consider it a favor to be struck by one of these celestial tiles, which will send them straight to Paradise. The sheikh, who rather doubted our religious fanaticism and our eagerness to see the Prophet, invited us not to prolong our visit to this locality, exposed as we were to the caprice of these sacred showers. “The dominating impression in a visit to the mosques is the exclusively religious and almost poetic character of these buildings. They are not our smart Parisian cathedrals nor our imitation Greek temples—real ¢heaters of devotion at the hours of service. Seeing all these Arabs, silent and grave, prostrate themselves before the wall of the mArab, 1 could not help thinking of my dear parish of the Madeleine, where the one o'clock mass resembles so nearly a premiere at a theater, that some people actually give up the races at Long- champs to attend it! At Cairo, there is fanaticism, if you please, but true religious faith, and its manifestations here have none of the elegant and frivolous piety of our Catholic mosques. The beadle and the pew-openers have no pres- tige in the Orient, and equality before God is there scrupulously observed; the dirtiest donkey driver invokes Allah on the same carpet as the most tichly caparisoned sheikh. To laugh, to blow one’s nose, or to sneeze would entail the most serious consequences upon the offender, and Heaven knows if we deprive ourselves at home of these diversions! I assisted several times at the reading of the Koran, but I never saw any one asleep. St. Paul himself could not have achieved a greater success !” The Mue. shows the sheikh standing on one of the balconies of the minaret and sending zin, Which hung beside the picture of this beautiful mosque, out his call to prayer over the city. The Exposition Salon of 1867, besides affording a second glimpse of the pictures we have before described, contained four new canvases in which ‘the artist again displayed the surprising range and depth of his powers. The most prominent was the Death of Cesar, the first sketch of which, seen by Gautier in the painter’s atelier, is described as follows: “Nothing can be more singular and striking than the Death of Cesar, as yet only a sketch, but where already the entire intention of the painter can be read. It is antiquity conceived after the manner of Shakespeare. The scene must have taken place thus! The body of Cesar—a real body, rolled in a bloody mantle—lies at the foot of the statue of the great Pompey, the pedestal being stained in his effort to hold himself up by it. “Appalled by the murder, and fearing to be compromised, the senators have taken flight, with the exception of one obese old man who has gone to sleep in his cwrwle chair; grown heavy and dull through excessive indulgence in good cheer, he has heard nothing through his profound slumber and has no idea of what has taken place. Imagine the scene! In the foreground, at the left of 116 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. the spectator, in the corner of the canvas, lies the body of the fallen Cesar ; at the right, several rows of empty chairs, some of them overturned in the pre- cipitation of flight. In the background, through the open door, the backs of the fleeing senators, who jostle each other in their haste; a little nearer the front, the group of conspirators waving their swords and withdrawing, now that their task of murder is achieved. Brutus, passing before the statue of Rome, which forms the pendant to that of Pompey, half turns and casts a melancholy glance behind him; he feels already that he has committed a useless crime, and the ‘Tu quoque, Brute,’ pierces his soul. Liberty was dead before he killed Cesar! Truly this is a bold and romantic manner of treating this most classic of sub- jects. Never did a scene in history appear more rea/. If photography had existed in Ceesar’s day, one could believe that the picture was painted from a proof taken on the spot, at the very moment of the catastrophe.” “The Death of Cesar {says Mrs. Strana- han in her admirable ‘‘ History of French Painting” | is perhaps Gérome’s grandest, as it is certainly his severest work. The adequate and impre ive conception of the subject, the learned presentation of it, and the skill of technique in depicting it unite to form its n one (1859) the body lies alone ; in the other (1867), more dramatic, the senators, one alone retaining his seat, are hurrying completeness. He gives it in two pictures : away as by an irresistible impulsion. But the nearly empty senate chamber is full of historic suggestion as it is also of artistic success.” A careful study of this great work leaves one so thrilled by its dramatic side, its potent memories, and subtle suggestions that we wonder with what eyes M. Charles Blane has regarded it, when he remarks that in this picture “the passions to be expressed are stifled under archzeological science !” Truly, he historical acces ries are carefully and accurately grouped, but the interest unconsciously and utterly centers itself in the emotions of the principal actors in this tragic scene, and in the analysis of the feelings of these quaking con- Ss irators, hastening from the presence of this great soul, who in death still retains nis power to awe, and before whose lifeless body the most daring tremble and ee. We well remember Gérome’s satisfaction when informed that the greatest fl Shakespearian actor of our epoch—Edwin Booth—has reproduced his wonderful picture in the stage setting of the third act of /wlius Cesar, in which he gives an ideal impersonation of Brutus. No greater testimony to the perfect distribution SPRINGTIME (ARABIA) 1890 LIF AND WORKS OF JE: V LEON GEROME. iat of dramatic, artistic, and historic values on this canvas could be desired than that furnished by this fact. Beside this chefd’euvre hangs another whose pathetic beauty sinks deep into the soul and rouses a feeling of indignant sympathy that blurs the eyes which look, and turn to look again and again. “Gérome's Slave-Market |says Maxime Du Camp] is a fact literally repro- duced, When the de//abs return from their long and painful journeys on the Upper Nile, they install their human merchandise in those great ofe/s which extend in Cairo along the ruined mosque of the Caliph Hakem; people go there to purchase a slave as they do here to the market house to buy a turbot. Seated on mats in the shadow of the galleries, with their nudity scantily concealed bya few gre. hair in the thousand little plaits that form their coiffure. The higher-priced asy tatters, the negresses await their purchasers, dozing, or braiding their women, those from the plateau of Gondar and from the country of Choa, are shut pf Abyssinian, whom M. Géréme has taken as the principal personage of his composition. She is nude, and the del/ab who has charge of her has the head of a regular brigand, accustomed to all manner of violence and abduction: the conception of an immortal soul has never troubled the mind of such a bandit ! up in separate rooms, awe It is one of these women, an reet eyes. The poor girl stands submissive, humble, resigned, with a fatalistic passivity very skillfully portrayed by the artist. A man surveys her and looks at her teeth as one inspects those of a horse,—and appraises the merchandise with the distrustful glance peculiar to the Arab. Two or three persons in beautiful costumes complete the principal group. In the inclosed background one perceives other slaves scattered here and there.” When we are finally able to tear ourselves away from this wonderful and touching scene, a masterpiece of sentiment, drawing, and color, we find another bit of Oriental life awaiting us in the Viewx Marchand d’ Habits. “The Clothes Merchant [says M. Du Camp] is one of those old men, numbers of whom exist in Cairo, who retain old customs, refusing absolutely to wear the tunic or the ferbouch,—remaining faithful to the ancient turban of white mous- seline and to the wide robe with its ample folds,—seeming themselves to be an itinerant curiosity, strolling through the streets and crying their bric-a-brac. When they meet a European, they halt, and with an engaging smile they offer a hachette, or an old poniard, saying, ‘Antica, Mameluke, bono, bono!’ This one of M. Géréme, carrying on his arm some lovely old rose-colored garments, offers a saber to an Arnaut, who is very near allowing himself to be persuaded ; a group has gathered near the merchant and each one is giving his opinion. In the background is a shop near which a reddish-colored dog is crouching in the pose of the god Anubis, and one catches sight of two women enveloped in white mantles who are entering their house. | 118 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, Gérome has seized en rowfe, with great felicity, the different types of the i} Orient. The Arab, the Skipetar, the Turk, the Barabras, the Syrian, can be 1 recognized at the first glance, and in the ethnographic expression of his person- iit} ages he is always correct (at least unless he attempts some jest, as he did last year with the heads heaped up in front of the Mosgue of El-Hacanin).” i) One more Eastern’ scene completes the list, Zhe Chess-plavers, a small canvas which forms part of the famous collection inherited by the late Sir 1 Richard Wallace from his father, Lord Hertford. | The autumn of 1867 beheld Géréme again en route for the Orient, this time for a journey of greater length and range than any he yet had undertaken. We have already referred to it in quoting from the volume written by his ‘‘ Fidus Hi Achates,” the witty and lovable Paul Lenoir, who was to be the chronicler of Hl this grand tour. “Embarked upon the steamboat at Marseilles, all was excitement with the younger members of the party when the mists slowly lifted from the horizon and the coast of Africa revealed itself like a long golden straw floating in the distance. Their imagination getting ahead of the vessel, they vied with each other in being the first to discover the most imperceptible objects. Do you see this? Do vow see that? They are palms!—No! they are camel for they were only windmills!” s !—No, again— Arriving finally at Alexandria, Adha-Anna, who had been Gérome’s cook on his first trip to Egypt, took charge of all the baggage and left the travelers free to roam through the narrow streets where, says Lenoir: “Everything seems to roll like pebbles in a torrent; your toes are trodden on through principle, and you are hustled and jostled through religious con- viction ; the dromedaries, asses, and horses appropriate the best part of the paved road and the foot-walks ; the rest of the street is generously abandoned to foot- passengers, to the women who, wrapped in their long blue draperies, either carry enormous burdens or drag along with a garland of children hanging in clusters among their rags and tatters. “Alexandria is the inevitable antechamber of Cairo, as, ina badly planned apartment, one is forced to pass through the kitchen in order to reach the drawing-room! Endless avenues of tamarisks and lemon trees shade the banks of the Grand Canal of Mahmoudiéh, and the blues, reds, and yellows of luxurious villas offer a charming contrast to the thousand tints of the exotic vegetation, from the pearl-gray of the aloe to the emerald-green of the banana. The slender masts of the long dahabichs s sem to touch the sky as they glide along towed by an odd mélange of animals ; now a camel and an ass are harnessed together, now a shapely horse and a heavy, clumsy buffalo. To-day there is a railway by way of Damanhour ; the houses, built of earth or dried brick, lean against each other, and one can scarcely decide where the village ends and the country begins, so LIF ND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 119 uniformly gray is the earthy color. Farther on, the aspect of the country changes and one is conscious of penetrating to the heart of Egypt. Enormous fields of grain recall the low-lying fields in Holland, save that here and there snowy herons furnish a luminous point in the general monotonous tone of green. “An infinite variety of birds dart past ; everything, from the diminutive lap- wings fluttering about like August butterflies to the noisy sparrow-hawks and strong-winged eagles. Arrived at Cairo, Géréme organized a goodly caravan, composed, as we see from his own notes, of twenty-seven camels, including ten dromedaries, which carried the artists and their servants. While the preparations were being made for the desert journey, Cairo and the vicinity were thoroughly studied from the artist's point of view, and the pictures elaborated from the sketches here taken prove a perfect panorama of Oriental life, to which the notes of master and pupil furnish a piquant commentary. What seemed greatly to amuse the latter were the little beasts of which Géréme has given us so good a type in his 4ze Lgyptien. While the master paints, Lenoir embodies their reflections as follows: “The ass plays too important a réle in life at Cairo and throughout the Orient not to merit the honor of a zodlogical digression. In the first place, my It was properly speaking the bowrriguot of Cairo, a quad- tuped of a special nature, which should not be confounded with the beast of burden, the common ass. The dourriguot is as lively, adroit, intelligent, and indefatigable as his brothers of Montmorency are vicious, lazy, and obstinate. The ass is not only the first friend you make in the Orient, he is also the best pair of shoes you can buy! for you only use your boots when you throw them under the bed. Always mounted on an ass, a horse, or a dromedary, the cus- tomers of St. Crispin economize here astonishingly in shoe-leather. We lived, so to speak, on an ass, during our whole expedition in the province of Fayoum, just as, during the two months in the Desert of Sinai and at Petra, we lived on a dromedary.” ass was not an ass! We have already laughed over the first wild rush through the narrow streets of Cairo, but the little band did not always ride at such breakneck speed. Every novel effect of color and form, of pose and grouping, was caught by keen eyes and without delay transferred to the ever ready canvas: “In the more aristocratic quarters, the passing of camels is prohibited by law, and here wealthy inhabitants dash to and fro in handsome, springy barouches, preceded by runners richly costumed. “On every side we see the admirable sculptures in wood, which, under the form of moucharabiéhs, serve as windows and ventilators to the elegant resi- dences ; arches surmounted by terraces, fountains of rose-colored marble, niches 120 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. adorned with paintings, slender pillars in every species of granite, carved bal- conies, doors mysteriously ajar, each furnished with an almost imperceptible véilleuse and piquing our curiosity to the highest degree.” Géréme gives us a glimpse of one of these Eastern houris who was not so averse to being seen, in his A/mée at the Window of her Moucharabiéh. Each ramble furnished him with half-a-dozen motifs for canva: that have never been hung at any Salon and the greater part of which have never even been seen by his country men, since eager amateurs have invaded his ateliers and carried vie : them off to distant lands almost a ee F before the paint was dry. One ! Sf of the favorite points of rendez- th vous was the Gate of Babel- 1 Nasr, the most beautiful of the seventy-two gates which adorn the walls of Cairo. ‘By its elegant architecture and historic associations it well merits admiration and attention, for it was through this gate that General Bonaparte passed on the 29th of July, 1798, the day after the battle of the Pyramids. It eee was the first study that Géréme sit to Cairo. sd by two enormous square made on his first vi Flank towers, this door presents an appearance at once imposing and gracious, through its colossal proportions and the sculptured ornaments that make it a real work of art. Two doors, literally covered with iron, close the entrance to this warlike construction. Beneath the arch a military post is stationed, which Géréme has immortalized in his Arnauts of Cairo. Assuredly they are there from love of ornamentation and to please us painters, for, studying this group of soldiers decked out in brilliant costumes, one is tempted to question their strategic utility as regards the secu- tity of the city. While awaiting a new conquest of Egypt by no matter whom, these decorative soldiers, these sentinels of comic opera, have no other orders than to stop the photographers whom they would honor with their confidence. “Their costume, artistically loosened, their luxurious arms as brilliant as they are inoffensive, their proud, disdainful attitudes, their slightest gestures everything about them seems to have been carefully studied. EUNUCH. GRAND WHITE THE LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 123 “Nothing, however, can be more natural than these interminable Greek mustaches which divide the face in two, like two enormous buffalo horns, and which form the greatest ornament of these energetic faces bronzed by the sun. The mustache, which has nothing of the Arabic in principle, is a sign of Albanian origin in the Cairene soldier. The Arnauts,—this Greek militia imported into Egypt by Mehemet-Ali to contend against the increasing impor- tance of the Mamelukes,—inaugurated at Cairo both the fustanelle and the mustache, the effect of which they heightened by wearing the richest stuffs they could find in this country which they had invaded. It was an innovation in a land where the beard is in high esteem, and where the respect due to a man is graduated according to the length of this ornament. A soldier amateur, the Arnaut plays his réle with ease, and becomes an indispensable bit of furniture at the door of a mosque or the entrance of a palace, with a dozen pistols and sabers artistically enlaced in the compartments of a wide belt of red leather, which gives him the appearance of a walking bazaar. His pipe, tobacco, and food find also a place on this vast ¢é/agére. He is fully conscious of his interesting appearance and, in order not to disturb a single one of the arms in the museum he carries on his stomach, he keeps ready a tremendous couwrbache, which holds both enemies and admirers at a distance. The courbache is a long flexible whip of hippopotamus hide, which combines the pliability of a whip with the precision of a stick. It is the indispensable scepter which obtains everything, regulates everything, and decides everything, when dakchich has become power- less to settle a delicate question. “A strange feature in these surroundings, which differed so essentially from Occidental scenes and customs, was found in the cemeteries which lay outside of the city, veritable forests of little whitewashed tombs, each of them consisting of a large flat stone laid upon an entablature of one or two steps at the most. The principal stone, forming the body of the tomb, is saddle-backed. At one of the extremities is erected a column, or a simple oblong stone, sculptured accord- ing to the importance of the deceased or the fortune of the parents. The end of his stone, generally very rudely cut, represents the coiffure of the dead, and the white ball, surmounted by the little fluted case, is nothing but the turban of the oroprietor, in marble or imitation stone, according to the rank of the defunct. On several tombs, more carefully decorated than the others, remains of palms and votive offerings could be distinguished. Sometimes we saw women draped in ong blue veils, crouched near a tomb, their factitious sighs and methodica swaying imparting a savage tone to their manifestations of grief. Sometimes simply seated, at others literally extended full length on the stone, they seemed to speak with the dead. An idea of this singular conversation may be gatherec from the following phrases: ‘Is God great? Dost thou see him? Art thou happy? Await me—dost thou hear?’ and so on interminably, for the defunct are generally discreet enough not to reply!” Géréme's two pictures of Tombs of the Sultan at Broussa give one a perfect idea of these strange sepulchers, before which a sheikh recites, at intervals, selec- 124 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. tions from the Koran, keeping up a sort of perpetual prayer, burning candles and incense according to the rank of the deceased. The City of Caliphs, improperly called the Valley of Tombs, has furnished him with materials for many inter- esting paintings. “Its minarets and domes group themselves with the premeditation of a theatrical decoration which desires to surpass the most extravagant expectations. The multitude of these monuments, seemingly leaning against each other vy reason of the marvelous perspective, which permits us to take them all in at a glance; the variety of their dimensions, the inde- scribable elegance of their Saracen archi- tecture, oblong cupolas of almost Persian forms; these graceful minarets, each story of which rev als marvels of sculpture; the gilded crosses which surmount them, the bits of fi aience sparkling in the midst of arabesques of marble—all this transported us to a former world, and we almost expected to meet Saladin on an elephant at some turn in the ancient cross-roads ! ‘Everything in this spot confirms the sentiment of religious admiration which has taken possession of us: the solitude of these almost abandoned mosques, the uncivilized character of the clay houses that surround them, and even the types of the few inhabitants seem to conform to the style of that magnificent Mussul- man epoch under which were produced the most beautiful chefs d’euvre of Byzantine art interpreted by the Arabs. “It was not Cairo, it was Bagdad suddenly transported into Egypt to console the painters who were not to have the happiness of going as far as the ancient capital of the Caliph Haroun-al-Raschid. “In the interminable row of monuments, each more graceful and admirable than the other, the first mosque we approached was that of El-Achraf. Its ruined interiors still present a most interesting and almost complete ensemble. The little carved pulpit where the Koran was read is still intact, sheltered as it is in one of the angles of the principal hall. Toa height of several meters the walls are decorated with inlaid work and mosaics in exquisite taste. Higher up, these luxurious decorations are supplemented by sober paintings, the charming designs of which are fully equal in detail to all the other Arabic ornamentation. A slight recess in Gothic form offers the richest decoration in the whole mosque. This veritable aéside is not indifferently placed, but corresponds to the direction of Mecca, and it is there the sheikh begins the dull and drowsy intoning of the LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME. 125 prayers or the reading of the Koran. The carved pulpit is placed at the right of this sanctuary, where there is no altar, but simply a great profusion of lamps and inscriptions. Two enormous copper candlesticks, adorned with two wax tapers, still more enormous, mount guard on either side. “The short, wide form of the candlestick and the colossal size of the candle make one dubious at first sight as to the nature of this object, which is the entire visible expression of the Mussulman worship. Some day madea study of this mosque, which admirably renders its mysterious and poetic character. after this, one of us “We had left our asses at the door, and also conformed to the law which prohibits the shoes from accompanying their owners into the holy place. You can imagine nothing odder than this battalion of boots sadly awaiting us on the steps, where they seemed to envy us our privileges. The regulation bakchich being bestowed on the sheikh, who is the doorkeeper of the mosque, we bestrode our beasts, who of their own accord—such is their instinct for the beautiful— deposited us at the entrance of the Mosque El-Barkouk. While we were in the mosque the sight of our coursers had aroused the poor population, always hidden away under the rubbish ; and like flies attracted by a bit of meat, this multitude of women and children endured the rudest blows of our donkey boys, rather than slacken their hold and renounce the paras of copper which we would toss them in charity under the pretext of its being ‘‘bakchich.” For one must not fall into the error of confounding bakchich with charity ! which latter would doubtless be aumiliating to an Arab; the former is a gift, a pr respect and desire to honor each other! Bakchich is Orient ; it is an indir sent among princes who a colossal institution in the ct contribution from the traveler, which may easily exceed the cost of the whole journey if he does not guard against too great liberality in his offerings. In addition, gratitude on the part of the child and woman consists in a renewal of the demand with an irritating persistency proportionate to the generosity which you have displayed in your first donation. The Mosque of El-Barkouk is more imposing than that of El-Achraf, although of a later period. ts principal entrance, surmounted by covered galleries, produces an extra- ordinary effect; the staircas a in marble, and the columns of porphyry, are avishly and picturesquely disposed. The taste of a skillful architect has cer- tainly presided over this luxurious ornamentation ; for this richness is not the result of a ridiculous heaping up of precious materials nor of loud colors, as in the more modern constructions of the Mussulman religion. St. Sophia, with its superabundance of gilding and gigantic proportions, certainly does not produce the impression of grandeur and mysterious poetry which the Mosques of Cairo inspire to the highest degree, from the superb Mosque of Hassan (El-Assaneyn) to the smallest of the constructions which adorn the tombs of the Mamelukes,— so fully do taste and elegance make up for mathematical proportions of a purely massive and coarse construction.” ¢ worship in these wonderful mosques, and in the Reading of the Koran, where the érome indeed made a thorough study of the different views and times of 126 LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, central figure of the white-bearded patriarch is especially fine; Prayer in a Mosque, with ten figures in various devotional attitudes: Zhe Mihrab, with the sheikh seated on the floor reading, and another Prayer, with five figures, he reproduces not only the strange coloring, the magnificent sculptures in wood and marble, and the graceful groupings and postures, but also the profound religious sentiment which is ingrained in these simple Mussulmans, so faithful and unpre- tentious in their worship. In Public Prayer in the Mosque of Amrou, with its flock of doves fluttering down between the marble pillars,—which forms part of the collection bequeathed by Miss Catherine Wolfe to the Metropolitan Museum of New York,—the artist has given us, we think, the most perfect of all these interiors. ““Amrou, general under the Caliph Omar, was the author of this monument, which is reputed to be the first Mussulman mosque built at Cairo. “Nothing has arisen to contradict this origin, and the style of the edifice confirms all the details connected with it. Gam-a-Amrou is the A rabic name. Constructed in the year 640 of our era, at the time of the conquest by the Arabs, it can be considered as a point of departure, or the cradle of Islamism in Egypt. Situated to the east of old Cairo, with which it is contemporaneous, it is sur- rounded to-day by endless rubbish, shapeless ruins of the city of which it oubtless was the most beautiful ornament. The walls of this architectural relic form a perfect square, the interior being only the regular peristyle of an immense court. Two hundred and thirty columns of marble form the foundation of this open air edifice, for the covered portion is insignificant relatively to the rest of the building. “In the center of this enormous court is the traditional pool of the mosques, where each Mussulman performs his indispensable ablutions before beginning his prayers. This little pavilion, still dotted with paintings on the lower part, is haded by a superb palm tree, which seems to be the time-honored guardian of his holy place. But the water of the pool argues little in favor of the piety of Aan ne faithful of to-day, unless it is a result of their uncleanliness! We made a conscientious study of this remarkable locality, where the slightest details express noots up almost immediately over the principal entrance, and gs gnals from afar ic the pure simplicity and consequent beauty of Arabic art. A graceful minaret S U ae presence of this important building, which, without it, would scarcely be perceived on account of its regular form and the way it is closed in by ruins of the ancient city and fragments of every description, increased by the encroach- ment of the sand. In the covered part, which forms the sanctuary, where there are six rows of columns, but few points recall the worship so long carried on in this mosque. Its méhrab, or abside, turned toward Mecca, is in a state of ruin, as well as the mender, the sculptured pulpit so religiously cherished in other mosques. “Tradition, or an apocryphal legend, calls your attention to a long white vein or seam in one of the columns near this pulpit. This miraculous scar is LIFE AND WORKS OF JEAN LEON GEROME, ie NS attributed to the courbache of the Caliph Omar. The tomb of the author, or rather founder, of this public building and the city argues in favor of his modesty : his funeral monument is a simple rectangular stone, surmounted by a common little roof supported by four sickly little columns, and this excess of simplicity has not lessened the veneration which true Mussulmans profess for Amrou and his mosque, for the most important personages honor it often with their official visits and carry away blessings of a very superior quality. “In a second visit which we made ex masse to this interesting mosque, we wished to comply with a pious legend which is one of the accessories of the edifice, as follows: On the right of the door, under the peristyle of the court, are two slender columns formed of a single piece of marble, bound together by their capitals and the ornaments at the base. A space of only a few centimeters separates the two shafts, and a pious Arabic legend gives to this opening the most agreeable properties, among others that of prolonging the life of all those who can pass between the two columns without breaking their ribs! Several of our party, thanks to their youth and the elegant slenderness of their build, slipped through like letters into a postal-box, easily carrying off a license of longevity a@ discrétion. But one of us had to make such efforts that the columns seemed to crack at contact with his powerful physique. ‘He'll get through!’ ‘He won’? get through!’ He dd get through, but at what cost! At another spot we assured ourselves eternal happiness by running, with our eyes blindfolded, a space of several meters, at the end of which we were to touch a black slab inlaid in the wall. The Arabs were convinced of our utter dishonesty, so often did we suc- ceed in hitting it, nearly all of us striking the center of this celestial target. The serious and almost fanatic conviction of the sheikh of the mosque con- trasted singularly with the comic side of these superstitious legends, which recalled to us the sack- races and blindman’s-buff of our merry schoolboy days. “ After numerous salamaleks, and still more numerous bakchichs, we were able to tear ourselves away from the congratulations and compliments of the sheikh, who doubtless saw in us future neophytes, or good customers, considering the enthusiasm which we had displayed for his little games of chance and of eternal salvation ! “We returned to Cairo at full gallop by the route which runs along the Nile as far as Boulak. A thousand picturesque incidents would have detained us had we not been preoccupied with an important operation which awaited us at the hotel, namely, the selection of a dragoman for our expedition to Fayoum,