| | HAD MIPSHIRE 
 W K: ‘Am 3 ne “INTER. LBtARY 
 
 i RX 
 NUMISMATIC c Noes” Roy ae 5. 
 | AND MONOGRA des V5 ine 
 
 Pay qf 
 
 No. 34 
 
 “THE. SECOND AND THIRD * 
 SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 
 
 - EDGAR ROGERS 
 
 THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY 
 _ BROADWAY AT IS6TH STREET | 
 NEW YORK | 
 iya7 | » 
 
PUBLICATIONS 
 
 The American Journal of Numismatics, 
 1866-1920. . 
 
 ‘Monthly, May, 1866-April, 1870 
 ‘Quarterly, July, 1870-October, 1912. 
 Annually, 1913-1920. : 
 
 With many plates, illustrations, maps and tables . 
 Less than a dozen complete sets of the Jour- 
 nal remain on hand. Prices on application. 
 
 The numbers necessary to complete broken sets 
 may in most cases be obtained.’ An index to 
 
 the first fifty volumes has been issued as part 
 of Volume LI. It may also be purchased 
 separately for $3.00. 
 
 —_— — 
 
 The American Numismatic Society. Catalogue 
 of the International Exhibition of Contempo- 
 
 _ rary Medals. March, 1910. New and revised 
 edition. New York. IQII. xxxvi, 412 
 pages, 512 illustrations. $10.00. 
 
 The American Numismatic Society. Exhibition 
 of United States and Colonial Coins. I914. 
 vii, 134 pages, 40 plates. $1.00. . 
 
 = ’ 
 
 £ 
 
Eee > MAT I OC 
 NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS 
 
NuMISMATIC NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS 
 is devoted to essays and treatises on sub- 
 jects relating to coins, paper money, 
 medals and decorations, and is uniform 
 with Hispanic Notes and Monographs 
 published by the Hispanic Society of 
 America, and with Indian Notes and 
 Monographs issued by the Museum of the 
 
 American Indian—Heye Foundation. 
 
 PUBLICATION COMMITTEE 
 
 AcneEs BAtpwin Brett, Chairman 
 W. Gepney BEATTY 
 Henry Russet, Drowne 
 
 Joun ReItty, Jr. 
 
 EDITORIAL STAFF 
 
 SYDNEY Puitip Nog, Editor 
 How.anp Woop, Associate Editor ° 
 
THE SECOND. AND THIRD 
 SBLEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 
 
 ’s) 
 BY > 
 EDGAR ROGERS b 
 | Q, Ne 
 Bt 
 Qn & 
 o 
 SoH 
 x D 
 00 Ey 
 § 
 can 
 x 
 <x 
 
 THE AMERICAN NUMISMATIC SOCIETY 
 BROADWAY AT 156TH STREET 
 NEW YORK 
 1927 
 
ar 
 
 a> ' é : 
 NH 
 AN , 
 a , 
 ~ . 
 
 ny | it> 
 | = 
 ee, i 23 
 ’ a 
 vay 14 es : 
 uy te Ge. : 
 ea) 
 ‘ ¢ > t} iaten. “ 
 ; ri « 
 Ys Fe 
 ‘ wy ‘. “y 
 , re x 
 ; ‘ 
 5 a 
 
 ‘ 
 \) THE AME 
 
 RICAN NUMI 
 
 a 
 
THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 
 
 FOREWORD 
 
 In accepting the generous invitation of Mr. 
 Edward T. Newell, President of the American 
 
 _ Numismatic Society, to continue his investigation 
 
 into the Seleucid Mint of Tyre, some sort of ex- 
 planation should be made. My interest in the 
 Seleucid mint of Tyre began, as philosophy is said 
 to begin, in wonder. A good many years ago grave 
 doubts arose in my mind as to whether a tetra- 
 drachm of Antiochus III, apparently bearing the 
 recognized monogram of Tyre, was really issued 
 
 from that mint at all. The authorities of the day 
 
 said it was: I ventured to think it was not and so 
 began to study the mint of Tyre. As my numis- 
 matic studies are compelled to be intermittent from 
 the very nature of my calling, Mr. Newell was able 
 to anticipate me and reached conclusions after 
 which I had been blindly groping. . 
 
 From Antiochus III to Demetrius I, Mr. Newell 
 has elucidated the coinage of Tyre. The historical 
 value of his conclusions is incalculable. Without 
 them the numismatic history of Tyre is nonsense 
 
 I 
 
2 THE SECOND AND Trim 
 
 and any classification of the Seleucid series merely 
 fantastic. Further, the principles he has outlined 
 for the earlier coinage, if applied generally, will solve 
 many of.the puzzles and make this wonderful Seleu- 
 cid series an open book. The coinage for Tyre has 
 been classified by Mr. Newell up to the beginning of 
 the reign of Alexander Balas. My work begins. at 
 that point and endeavors to throw some light on 
 certain of the questions which arise. 
 
 THE SECOND COINAGE 
 
 From Alexander Balas onward, the activities of 
 the Seleucid mint of Tyre are perfectly straight- 
 forward. There are no problems of min cee ae 
 which is the real fun of numismatics. 
 
 The minor problems are possibly, from the nature 
 of the case, totally insoluble. I have made an at- 
 tempt to solve one of them, but I claim no finality 
 for the solution I propose. 
 
 After the defeat and death of Demetrius I, the ~ 
 Saviour, the mighty hunter of the House of Seleucus, 
 Alexander Balas, the putative son of Antiochus 
 Epiphanes became the Greek King in Syria. He 
 owed his victory and his throne to the powerful 
 support of Ptolemy Philometor of Egypt. How 
 real that support was may be gauged from the fact 
 that as soon as ever Alexander was established in 
 his kingdom, Ptolemy forced him to marry his 
 daughter Cleopatra, and the Seleucid court was 
 removed from Antioch to Ptolemais, where the 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 3 
 
 marriage took place “with great pomp, as the man- 
 ner of kings is.’ 
 
 This Egyptian alliance had an fanediate effect 
 upon the coinage of Tyre. A new standard of 
 weight was introduced and a new type, both 
 Ptolemaic. 
 
 As far as Tyre is concerned, the second coinage, 
 which lasted from B. C. 151/150 (A.S. 162) until 
 B.C. 126/125 (A.S. 187), may well be said to have 
 begun and ended with Cleopatra. This infamous 
 woman, successively the wife of Alexander Balas, 
 Demetrius II and Antiochus VII, granted Tyre its 
 freedom as a reward for the murder of her second 
 husband. Her twenty-five years of political intrigue 
 cover the period of the second coinage. 
 
 Both silver and copper coins were issued, the for- 
 mer certainly in abundance. No gold has come to 
 light. The silver denominations are the tetra- 
 drachm, the didrachm the drachm and the half 
 drachm. The copper, following the very wise prec- 
 edent of Mr. Newell, are the chalkous, the hemi- 
 chalkous, the dilepton and possibly the lepton. 
 
 The prototype of the silver coins is the ordinary 
 Lagid tetradrachm of the Ptolemaic Kings in 
 Egypt. The obverse is always the king’s portrait 
 and the reverse is the eagle on the prow of a galley 
 with a palm-branch except in the case of the single 
 half drachm known. 
 
 The copper, in contrast with the usual practice of 
 the Seleucids, has a different type for each denomina- 
 tion, although the obverse is always the King’s 
 
4 THE SECOND AND ‘THIRD 
 
 portrait. The largest denomination, which is con- 
 veniently called the chalkous, has on the reverse the 
 stern of a galley, usually ornamented with the aph- 
 laston, the half chalkous has the prow and palm, the 
 dilepton has the palm tree with fruit, and the lepton 
 a club, which appears on a single example Be 
 to Antiochus IV in my collection. 
 
 In view of the difference of this coin I have 
 thought it right to assign the lepton (prow and 
 palm—caps of Dioskouroi) to the mint of Tripolis 
 and to find a rudder rather than a prow on the coins. 
 
 The distinction of type for different denominations 
 is markedly Phoenician and does not obtain in the 
 money of other Seleucid mints. A persistent feat- 
 ure, especially of the obverse, is a border of dots. 
 This stands out in sharp contrast with the bead and 
 reel border, which was becoming more and more 
 popular upon the monies of Attic weight. 
 
 It is worth while noting that there exists a tetra- _ 
 drachm of the Phoenician type of Ptolemy Philo- 
 metor of the year B. C. 148 with a monogram, which 
 appears to indicate Ptolemais. It is obviously con- 
 nected with the expedition, which he made into 
 Palestine and Phoenicia to bring to his senses” 
 Alexander Balas, whose dissolute life threatened 
 disaster. The Phoenician mints were in some 
 degree disorganized and a Sidon tetradrachm of 
 Attic weight, remains as witness. Certainly the 
 coins of this year are the rarest in the reign of 
 Alexander. 
 
 The mint of Tyre had its own idea of the 2 ist 
 
6 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 At all events the same standard was continued,* 
 even after Tyre regained its freedom, upon autono- 
 mous issues and so long as Imperial Rome authorized 
 silver monies (always provided that the tetra- 
 drachms, ranging from Wespasian to Trajan are 
 rightly attributed to Tyre) with the single exception 
 of what I have ventured to call the third Seleucid 
 Coinage of Tyre. 
 
 There is however one problem, the most tantaliz- 
 ing of all. That problem is the interpretation of 
 the monograms, which occur upon the coins through- 
 out. They are not numerous and are easy to 
 classify. On the other hand, if once they were 
 really understood, they: would throw a flood of light 
 of the utmost value upon the monetary arrange- 
 ments of the Seleucid Kings. 
 
 The following table shews all that have come to 
 light. 
 
 *In the Catalogue des Rois de Syrie a tetradrachm of 
 Alexander Balas (no. 887), although described as a Phoe- 
 nician tetradrachm is stated to weigh 16 gr. 10. As this, 
 if true, would open up an insoluble problem, I wrote to 
 M. Babelon, suggesting it was probably a misprint. With 
 that kindness—to which I personally owe so much—he 
 replied immediately, ‘‘ Le poids est, non pas de 16 gr. 10, 
 comme il est imprimé, mais de 14 gr. 10. Il y a la une 
 simple faute d’impression, puisque la piéce est classée et 
 décrite parmi les tetradrachmes de poids phénicien, et non 
 pas attique: la correction s’impose d’elle-méme.”’ 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 7 
 
 Year Monograms 
 
 Alexander I 
 BHP M1 
 PEEP ae § AC 
 AHP &B | Fe AL | Fe* 
 EHP el civ) eee 
 Cc HP ee 
 ae se a 
 
 Demetrius II - 
 
 74,P “i 6 "4 
 
 H&P ‘i 
 
 @EP | «| « 
 OP ‘6 ‘6 
 
 AOP cb 
 
 BOP ‘s A 
 
 TOP ‘i 
 
 Antiochus VII 
 AOP i Rigs pa 
 “c ZB 
 EOP R & |Al 
 UP oe Pu 
 ZOP pets 
 HOP e 
 @OP ho 
 
 = 
 » 
 
 * IT have sometimes suspected that this particular mono- 
 gram is only a malformed monogram {§. 
 
8 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 Year Monograms 
 
 Demetrius I] 
 
 and Reign. 
 TIP ZB) Fe 
 AIP ae Pa 
 BLIP: <4} “ne 
 HP hae ae 
 ZIIP A Ne Se ee 
 
 Before considering these monograms in detail, 
 there is one fact that should be noted. They occur 
 solely upon the silver money. No bronze of Tyre 
 has any monogram, which could possibly refer to a 
 monetary official. This has an important conse- 
 quence. Babelon (p. cxxiv), discusses the meaning 
 of the monogram € and shews that it is the 
 monogram of the word IEPA, so that with the 
 other constant monogram a¥ and the club sur- 
 mounted by ¥ we have an abbreviated form of the 
 full legend TYPOY JEPAX KAI AX YAOY. 
 This is of course established by a remarkable tetra- 
 drachm and didrachm (see Catalogue of Types, be- 
 low, nos. 39, 40). 
 
 Such monograms and such a legend, he goes on to 
 say, clearly indicate a royal mint. Where the coins 
 read T'YPIQN then they are issued by municipal 
 authority. With that observation I entirely agree. 
 It therefore follows that in the second coinage of 
 Tyre no Seleucid King ever issued a bronze coin, and 
 that there must have been entirely different con- 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 9 
 
 ditions for silver from bronze. This is in no way 
 modified by the fact that there are certain bronze 
 coins of very low denomination (cf. Catalogue of 
 type nos. 26, 42, 45, 47, 96) of which the flans are ob- 
 viously too small to admit the word TYPIQN but 
 they shew neither ¢ nor at. 
 It may be taken for certain then that the Seleucid 
 King was only concerned with the silver issues from 
 the Tyrian mint. Either the right of coining bronze 
 was of little moment or its intrinsic value was so 
 slight as to obviate fraud. Judging from the extra- 
 ordinary fluctuations in weight of what apparently 
 are the same denominations in the whole of the 
 Seleucid coinage, as well as in other series of Greek 
 bronze, the conclusion is inevitable that the bronze 
 coinage must have represented an arbitrary value 
 and been in the nature of a ‘‘token’’ coinage, a 
 position still actually existing today. I recently 
 weighed a five shilling bag of English pennies, all 
 current and in mint condition with the unexpected 
 result that their margin of variation was more than 
 20 grains. 
 
 The presence, then, of a monogram on the silver 
 coins may mean that the Seleucid King intended to 
 fix the responsibility for their fineness upon some- 
 body, who might be brought to book for defaulting. 
 While that is true of other Seleucid mints, e. g. An- 
 tioch, I hope to shew why it was not true at Tyre. 
 Again, as in no case does more than one monogram 
 appear upon a coin, it follows that the responsibility 
 might be fixed upon a particular individual or a 
 
10 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 definite quarter. In the Mint of Antioch and else- 
 where two or three persons sign the monies: but at 
 Tyre a simpler method obtains. Each coin is 
 referable to a single individual or a single quarter. 
 That was a distinctly sound business procedure, 
 appropriate to the Semitic instincts of those in 
 authority at Tyre. | 
 So much is clear, the rest is conjecture. The 
 monograms may stand for officinae as Mr. G. F. 
 Hill suggests in the B.M.C. for Phoenicia, or they 
 may stand for monetary officials of one sort or 
 another. Normally the table of monograms sug- 
 gests that during the days of Alexander Balas and 
 the first reign of Demetrius II, there were two au- 
 thorities responsible, and in the time of Anti- 
 ochus VII and Demetrius II (second reign) three. 
 When circumstances demanded, more were added. 
 Whether these authorities, officials or officinae func- 
 tioned simultaneously or consecutively is net clear. 
 From this point the problem thickens. A cursory 
 examination of the Table shews that for some con- 
 siderable time Fe and & held the ground, and 
 that Fe ZBM from the beginning of the reign of 
 Antiochus VII to the end of the series carried on. 
 Personally I am inclined to believe that B® and 
 23; = and M respectively represent the same 
 signature. Whether I am right in this or not, at 
 least it is certain that three of these signatures con- 
 tinued to Roman times long after the Seleucid Mint 
 of Tyre was closed and forgotten. Thus Fr runs 
 from 149/8 B.C. to 123/2: ZB from 139/8 B.C. to 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE: OF TYRE II 
 
 107/6 and M from 151/o0 B.C. to 103/2. hat is 
 rather a wonderful record. There is of course 
 nothing inherently impossible in such lengths of 
 service, and they might be paralleled by many in- 
 stances in individual cases from many mints, but 
 I confess that the longevity of the three principal 
 officials of the Mint of Tyre arouses my suspicions. 
 One patriarch in the service is conceivable but that 
 all the principal officers should have put in forty 
 years’ work is a big proposition to accept. Of 
 course it may be true that a monetary magistracy 
 was an hereditary affair and descended from father 
 to son, and in that case the difficulties of time are 
 overcome: but there is not as yet a scrap of evidence 
 to prove it so. 
 
 The theory that these monograms stand for 
 officinae, though in some ways attractive, bristles 
 with difficulties. Fr is perplexing. A digamma at 
 this date is almost inconceivable, for what then 
 could Fe stand? I venture a suggestion, though it 
 may appear in the nature of the wildest guess. The 
 Semitic word for “‘first’’ is NWN, which would be 
 written at this date in Tyre approximately thus 
 Liw¥1. The first two letters are perilously like 
 the monogram Fr. Possibly then these constant 
 monograms are intended to represent serial issues, 
 covering certain periods in the year. 
 
 The objection to regarding them as the signatures 
 of magistrates has already been noted, the argu- 
 ments for rejecting them as the marks of officinae 
 are even more cogent. A careful examination of 
 
12 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 the dies reveals the fact that the same obverse dies 
 are combined both in the Seleucid and in the auto- 
 nomous mints with reverses bearing different mono- 
 grams, working strictly within the circumference 
 of the three more or less constant monograms. Al- 
 though, there are, no doubt, many other examples, 
 perhaps the following will be sufficient to prove the 
 point. My drachm of C EP with the monogram 
 KB has an obverse identical with that illustrated 
 in the Fenerley Bey Catalogue, 705 with the mono- 
 gram Fe. Mr. Newell has two tetradrachms of 
 Demetrius IT of the year Z&:P with identical obverse 
 dies but with reverses bearing the monograms OB 
 and Fp. 
 
 In the autonomous series it is hardly worth while 
 to detail instances: a glance at the B.M.C. (Phoe- 
 nicia) will shew that they abound. The conclusion 
 is inevitable. Different officinae would not use the 
 same dies. Whatever else the monograms stand 
 for, they do not stand for officinae. I am equally 
 certain that they do not stand for magistrates. The 
 conclusion to which I am forced is that the munici- 
 pality of Tyre accepted the responsibility for the 
 issue of all monies: for the bronze they had to render 
 no account: for the silver they were referable to the 
 Seleucid King, just so far as he had power to compel. 
 When that power was stable they issued monies 
 with the constant monograms, indicating periods of 
 issue rather than responsible officials: and the same 
 die might easily serve for more than one period 
 through material overlapping and in the two cases 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 13 
 
 I have quoted, the signatures are the same viz: BB 
 and Fp. 
 
 It remains then to try and explain the other 
 monograms. I suggest that the municipality 
 farmed out part of the coinage and the monogram 
 stands for the individual, who had bought or other- 
 wise secured the contract. Such an opportunity 
 for profit would be quite in keeping with Semitic 
 character. Individual enterprise no less in ancient 
 days than in modern has turned a state controlled 
 concern from a dead loss into a paying business. 
 The silver mines in Spain will occur as an example, 
 apposite because it was these very Phoenicians of 
 Tyre and Sidon, who were interested. The Roman 
 State found it paid better to farm them out than 
 to work them on their own account. 
 
 It is further quite natural to assume that before 
 the municipality settled into its stride and realised 
 its privilege of striking coins and even afterwards, 
 when its own machinery was inadequate to meet 
 the demand, it went outside its own arrangements 
 to supplement its issues. The monograms extant 
 in the early days of Alexander Balas bear this out, 
 and an interesting parallel can be found in recent 
 British coinage. In 1918 the royal mint could not 
 cope with the demand for copper. Part of the 
 enormous issue necessary was struck at two private 
 mints. Messrs. Heaton of Birmingham and the 
 King’s Norton Copper Company were pressed into 
 the service and some of the pennies of 1918 and 
 I919 are marked with the letters H or K.N. to 
 
14 THE SECOND AND THIRD| 
 
 indicate the source of their manufacture.. The 
 coins of Tyre bearing monograms other than the 
 two early constant and the three later constant 
 monograms are infrequent and so suggest some 
 arrangement.of this sort. : 
 
 There-is only one further point to notice about the 
 second coinage. In the year BOP, that is B.C. 140 
 or A.S. 172 a tetradrachm and a didrachm of an 
 unusual type were issued. The tetradrachm is il- 
 lustrated in Bab. Pl. XX., 3. On the reverse in the 
 left field is a substantial club instead of the usual 
 club, surmounted with * , and in the field right 
 below the date is the monogram. Most remarkable 
 of all, the circular legend reads BAXIAKQX AH- 
 MHTPIOY as usual, but within it is a second legend 
 in smaller characters, which reads TYPOY IEPA 
 KAI AX YAOY. .The monogram is 4. There is 
 also a didrachm of the same year, probably reading 
 for monogram Fp . 
 
 It is impossible to account for the change. It 
 may have been an experiment to gratify the young 
 king, who was beginning to assert himself or it 
 may have been some commemorative issue. The 
 fact that it was not continued seems to prove that 
 it lacked popular acceptance. It is entirely confined 
 to one year and judging from its extreme rarity 
 it must have been a very small issue. 
 
 My conclusion of the matter is that the three 
 constant monograms indicate the yearly order of 
 issue of the monies, something like the Amphora 
 letters on the Athenian coins, or the months on the 
 
SELEWCID COINAGE OF TYRE 15 
 
 Parthian, or to come right up to date like the figures 
 3.4.5, which were placed below the date of the 
 English pennies of 1863 in order to indicate a con- 
 secutive series of issues. 
 
 As complete a catalogue of the known monies ot 
 the second Seleucid coinage of Tyre as is’ possible 
 follows :— 
 
 ALEXANDER BALAS. 
 
 BAC. 150-145~ A.S. 162-167. 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Alexander to r., 
 chlamys around neck, border of dots. 
 Re. AAKZANAPOY BAXIAEQ® from 
 left to right, circular. Eagle stands to |. on 
 spur of galley; palm branch over right 
 shoulder; in field r. date over monogram; 
 in field 1. club surmounted with monogram 
 
 of Tyre; border of dots. 
 
 Mono- De- 
 Daie gram nom. Collection 
 
 1. BEP M 4dr. Bab. 887; Newell (PLATE 
 lee av. ok, 1152) 
 
 Sie eees a s-  .. Vacat. | 
 
 a H f 2 B.M.G. si/1: Bab. 880: 
 Newell (PLATE I); Pozzi 
 2981-3; Nav. X, 1157-9. 
 
 ASKe. 2dr. Newell (PLATE I); Nav. 
 X, 1160. . 
 
 * With the exception of no. 130 on Plate IV and Fig.1-3, 
 the illustrations are all from coins in Mr. Newell’s cabinet. 
 
16 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 Mono- De- 
 Date gram nom. 
 
 5. TEP AC Adr. 
 
 6. AHP B& ¢ 
 ve 66 66 
 8 66 Fp 66 
 Q. 66 66 2dr 
 Lote AX 4dr 
 14: BaP &B = 
 12: "3 2dr 
 TA TeS e Dr. 
 Tite 7.9 4dr 
 15. bc Fe 66 
 163 AX Dr. 
 
 17, C &P BB 4dr. 
 
 Collection 
 Bab. 888; Cumberland- 
 
 Clark 274; Newell (PLATE 
 
 I). 
 
 B.M.C. 51/2: Bab. 893; 
 Newell (PLATE I); Nav. 
 a DPOZ. 
 
 Bab. 891; Newell (PLATE 
 I). 
 
 Bab. 892; Newell (PLATE 
 OF 
 
 . Newell. 
 . Newell (PLATE I); Nav. 
 
 X, 1166. 
 Newell. 
 
 . Newell (PLATE I). 
 
 Nav. X, 11737 
 
 . Amer. Numis. Society. 
 
 Petersen Sale, Dec. 1920, 
 no. 190; Pozzi 2984; O- 
 man; Newell (PLATE I); 
 Nav. X, 1171. 
 
 Newell (PLATE I) (= 
 Nav. X, 1174): 
 
 Bab. 898; Newel (PLATE 
 I). : 
 
 + Formerly Rogers’ collection from Fenerly Bey Sale, 
 Vienna, Nov. 1912, Pl. xix, no. 703. Dr. Macdonald 
 published a similar drachm in Zettschr. f. Num., vol. X XIX, 
 Pl. iv, 18 with AY, but I am convinced it is misread for [KB . 
 
18. 
 
 19. 
 
 25. 
 
 SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 17 
 
 Mono- De- 
 
 Date gram nom. 
 C =P B 2dr. 
 4c sé : Dr. 
 s Fp Adr. 
 ims bc 2dr. 
 4c 46 Dr. 
 ZLEaP 4dr 
 éé Fp 6 
 
 Collection 
 
 Newell. 
 
 Newell (= Nav. X, 1176) 
 (PLATE II). 
 
 B.M.C. 51/3; Bab. 896; 
 Hunter 65/61; Pozzi 2985; 
 Newell, Nav. X, 1174. 
 Rouvier 1869. 
 
 Fenerly Bey, 705. 
 
 a Aa RA/4e Nay. XM, 
 Lis. 
 
 Bab. 900; Newell = Nav. 
 MP irs. (PLATE II). 
 
 BRONZE ISSUE. 
 Obv. Diademed head of Alexander to r., 
 
 border of dots. 
 
 Rev. BAXIAKQ> AAKZANAPOY circu- 
 lar. Palm tree with fruit dividing date CHP. 
 Three specimens in Newell Coll. weights: 
 gr. 2.305, 2.54, (PLATE II) 2.225: Rogers gr. 
 
 2.00 1. e, Dilepta. 
 
 DEMETRIUS II (First RErcn). 
 } B.C. 146-138 A.S. 166-175. 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Demetrius to r., 
 chlamys around neck; border of dots. 
 
18 
 
 26. 
 
 THE SECOND ANDUIHIRD == 
 
 Rev. 
 
 AHMHTPIOY BAXIAEQ2 from left 
 
 to right, circular. Eagle stands to 1. on spur 
 of galley; palm branch over right shoulder; 
 in field r. date over monogram; in field 1. 
 club surmounted with monograms of Tyre; 
 
 border of dots. . . 
 
 Date 
 
 ZAP 
 
 POP 
 
 Mono- 
 gram 
 
 oe 
 
 De- 
 
 nom. Collection 
 
 4dr. 
 
 B.M.C. 58/4; Bab. 955; 
 Newell; Nav. X;,- 1199, 
 1200. . 
 Newell (PLATE 11); Nav. 
 A; 1204. 
 
 Bab. 957. 
 
 Newell (Pate II). 
 
 B.M.; Newell (PLATE II); 
 Nav: Xy1a0Ra 
 
 . Bab. 965. 
 . Bab. 964:. 
 . Bab. 963; Nav. X, 1204. 
 
 Bab. 970. 
 
 . Hunter 71/24. 
 
 Bab. 972; Newell (PLATE 
 II). 
 
 Newell (= Naville X, 
 1212) (PLATE II); Nav. X, 
 12Fh 
 
 Bab. 978. 
 
39: 
 40. 
 Al. 
 
 42. 
 
 SELEUCID 'COINAGE OF TYRE 19 
 SPECIAL ISSUE. 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Demetrius to r., 
 chlamys round neck, border of dots. — 
 
 Rey. BAZIAEQY AHMHTPIOY, in inner 
 
 circle and smaller letters: TY’POY IEPA 
 KAI AX YAOY from left to right circular. 
 Eagle standing to |. on spur of galley, palm 
 branch on right shoulder; in field |. club; in 
 : field r. date over monogram; border of dots. 
 
 Mono- De- 
 
 Date gram nom. Collection — - 
 
 BOP & _— 4dr. Bab. 976. 
 “tre...” 2tr. Berlin:* 
 
 Obv. Head of Demetrius II with diadem to r. 
 
 Rev. BAXIAK AHMH Palm tree with fruit; 
 in field 1., OOP. As the weight of this coin 
 is gr. 1.75 it must be a ‘hemidrachm and is 
 the single known example of this denomina- 
 tion. Vienna (cf. Macdonald, Joc. -cit., Pl. 
 iv, 20). 
 
 BRONZE ISSUES. 
 
 -DILEPTON. 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Demetrius to r., 
 border of dots. 
 
 Rev. BAXIAEQ* right AHMHTPIOY 
 left.. Palm: tree between LZ-HP. 
 
 * Dr. Macdonald in Zeitschr. f. Num., vol. X XIX, p. 97, 
 23, Pl. v, 1. He gives the monogram as C ; but a care- 
 
 ful examination of the plate shows it to be Fp. 
 
20 
 
 43. 
 
 44. 
 
 45. 
 
 46. 
 
 47. 
 
 48. 
 
 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 B.M.; Newell gr. 2.17 and 1.91 (PLATE 
 
 II). 
 
 CHALKOUS.. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. BAXIAEQD AHMHTPIOY LHEP 
 in three lines above stern of galley orna- 
 mented with aphlaston; below TYPIQN 
 me ee, 
 
 B.M.C. 60/20-23; Hunter 71/25-6; Bab. 
 980-3; Newell grs. 7.58, 8.44, (PLATE II), 
 5.485, 5-195; Rogers grs. 7.128. 
 
 CHALKOUS. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. Similar to 43 but date LHEP below 
 prow. B.M.; Rogers grs. 6.24. 
 
 DILEPTON. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. Similar to 42 but date HEP. 
 
 B.M.; Bab. 1246-8; Newell grs. 2.625; 
 2.225; 2.09; Rogers grs. 1.55; 2.68 
 
 CHALKOUS. 
 
 Obv. Similar. . 
 
 Rev. Similar to 43 but date OHP. 
 
 B.M.; Hunter 71/27-8; Bab. 984; Newell 
 grs. 5.01; Rogers grs. 6.80. 
 
 DILEPTON. | 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. Similar to 42 but date is O2P. 
 
 Newell gr. 2.07. 
 
 CHALKOUS. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 21 
 
 Rev. Similar to 43 but date is OP. 
 B.M.; Hunter 71/29. 
 49. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to 43 but date is AOP. 
 Rogers grs. 6.27. 
 
 ANTIOCHUS VI and TRYPHON. 
 
 There seems to have been no Seleucid mint at 
 Tyre for either of these reigns. 
 
 ANTIOCHUS VII. 
 Be 1jo-t29” AS. 174-183. 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Antiochus to r., 
 chlamys around neck; border of dots. 
 
 Rev. ANTIOXOY BAXIAEQ® from left to 
 right, circular. Eagle standing to 1. on spur 
 of galley; palm branch over r. shoulder; in 
 field r. A¥ over date; in field 1. # over 
 club surmounted with the monogram of 
 Tyre; monogram between eagle’s legs; border 
 of dots. 
 
 Mono- De- 
 Date gram nom. Collection 
 50. AOP fp Hunter 84/57: Newell (PLATE 
 II); Nav. X, 1249. 
 (IE instead of # ) 
 ( at instead of a¥ ) 
 
22 
 
 60. 
 
 61. 
 62. 
 
 63 
 
 Mono-. De- 
 
 Date gram nom. 
 51) AOP (ore acar 
 
 (a¥ and /e) 
 
 Adr. 
 
 bb ‘6 2dr. 
 ‘é ZB F ‘6 
 
 ; «6 > 4dr 
 SBOP sat : 
 éé A éé 
 3 66 ce 
 . COP Fp Adr. 
 (at or at 
 ie Or ¢t ) 
 
 2dr 
 
 a > 4dr 
 
 sé éé 2dr 
 
 . ZOP Fp Adr. 
 bé ry dé 
 
 64. 
 
 THE SECOND AND THIRD - 
 
 Collection 
 Bab. 1061. ' 
 
 Pozzi 2998. 
 B.M.C. 70/3: 
 B.M:; Nave®X, 1250. 
 
 . Bab. 1060. 
 
 Newell (PLaTeE II). . ~ 
 Bab. 1072. 3 
 Newell (PLATE IT). 
 B.M.C. 70/5; Bab. 1088; 
 Hunter 84/58; Pozzi 2999; 
 Newell (PLATE III); Nav. 
 X,' 1253-4. 
 
 : B.M.C. 70/6; Newell; Nav 
 
 X, 1255-6. 
 
 . DB. MECe ois Bab. 1090. 
 . B.M. (Bunbury); Hunter 
 
 85/64; Newell (PLATE III); 
 Bab. 1091; Nav. X, 1257. 
 B.M,C. 70/7; .. Hunter 
 84/59; Newell; Bab. 1099. 
 B.M.C. 70/8; Hunter 84/ 
 60; Bab.. 1102; Nav. X, 
 1260-1. 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 2° 
 
 Mono- De- 
 
 Date gram” nom. 
 wLOP: 3 2dr. 
 a am) Dre. 
 HOP F 4dr 
 cs ié 2dr. 
 OOP ‘* Adr 
 46 ‘6 2dr. 
 ‘4 x Adr 
 “é ‘é | 2dr. 
 IIP F& 4dr 
 ies ‘é 2dr. 
 ‘6 Re adr 
 7 . ‘2dr. 
 AIIP B 4dr 
 bs Fp fw 
 as éé 2dr. 
 ‘6 > ( Fe ?) sé 
 BUP.2 4dr 
 4a 6c 2dr 
 
 Qn 
 
 Collection 
 
 Bab.- 1102; ' Pozzi « 3000; 
 Newell (PLATE III); Nav. 
 X, 1262-3. 
 
 Newell (PLATE ITI). 
 
 . Bab. 1109; Nav. X, 1265- 
 6; Newell (PLATE III). 
 
 B.M.C. 70/9; Bab. 11rTo. 
 B.M.C. 70/10; Nav. X, 
 1267: 3 
 Rouvier 1906. 
 
 Nav. X%, 1268. 
 
 Nav. X, 1269. 
 
 Bab. 1120; Hunter 85/61; 
 Newell (PLATE III). 
 Bab.-1121; Nav. X, 1270. 
 B.M. 
 
 Rouvier 1908. 
 
 . Gagarem Sale Cat. 1912, 
 
 no. 63. 
 
 B.M.; Bab. 1124; Nav. X, 
 1271-2; Newell (PLATE 
 ITI). 
 
 Nav. X, 1273-4; Newell 
 (PLATE ITT) 
 
 Egger Sale, 1913, no. 706. 
 Nav. X, 1276-7; Newell 
 (PLATE IIT) — 
 
 Nav: X, 1278. 
 
24 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 Mono- De- 
 Date gram nom. Collection 
 83. BIIP Fr 4dr. B.M.C. 70/11; Hunter 85/ 
 62; Bab. 11263 Navex, 
 1275; Newell (PLaTE III). 
 
 Sai a e 2dr. Hunter 85/65; Rouvier 
 
 : 1912. 
 
 85. THUP B 4dr. B.M.C. 70/12. 
 
 Shits # 2dr. Newell (PLATE III); Nav. 
 X, 1281. 
 
 Soto Fr 4dr. Bab. 1137; Nav. X, 1279- 
 
 80; Newell (PLATE IV). 
 
 BRONZE ISSUES. 
 
 88. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Diademed head of Antiochus to r., 
 border of dots. 
 Re. BAXIAEQX ANTIOXOY LAOP 
 above stern of galley; bow TYPIQN 7137; 
 border of dots, B.M. 
 
 * Coins of Antiochus VII dated AIIP have been published 
 (Rouvier, nos. 1916-7, Bunbury Cat. II, 556). As An- 
 tiochus was killed in Parthia in ['IIP these coins, if ever 
 they were struck, must have been struck after his death. 
 But AIIP is so easily mistaken for AIIP that it may fairly 
 be concluded that these particular coins really read AIIP. 
 Especially is this the case as we have a large series of coins 
 struck by Demetrius at Tyre in T'IIP, and it is not con- 
 ceivable that this mint should have struck monies for both 
 Antiochus VII and Demetrius II for more bie <5 a year after 
 the former’s death! 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 25 
 
 89. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to 88 but date is ZOP. 
 B.M.,°- Newell gr. 7.92 (PLATE III); 
 Rogers grs. 6.82 
 90. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to 88 but date is HOP. 
 B.M. 
 91. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to 90 but date HOP is Galen 
 galley. 
 B.M.; Newell gr. 8.12 (PLATE IIIT), 5.855. 
 92. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to 90 but date is OOP. 
 Newell gr. 6.80, 6.17. 
 92a. CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. | 
 Rev. Similar tog1 but date is OOP. Rogers 
 gr. 5.63. 
 93. DILEPTON.ft 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Spur of galley and palm branch. Below, 
 
 OOP. 
 
 +A ‘Lepton,’ Obverse Caps of the Dioscuri, Reverse 
 Prow and palm branch, have been assigned to Tyre both 
 by the British Museum Catalogue (75/70) and by Babelon 
 (1168). ‘This is more probably a coin of Tripolis and there- 
 fore not incorporated here. 
 
26 
 
 THE SECOND:‘AND: THIRD = 
 
 B.M.: Newell gr. 2. 925 pe he 
 
 93a. CHALKOUS. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. BAZIAEQY AN TIOXOY * IEP a¥ 
 above stem of galley. Below OOP 139. 
 Rogers gr. 6.741. 
 
 DEMETRIUS II (SEconD REIGN). 
 B.C. 130-125 A.S. 182-187 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Demetrius to r., 
 chlamys around neck; border of dots. 
 
 ' Rev. AHMHTPIOY BAZIAEQ2® from left 
 
 to right circular. Eagle standing to 1. on 
 spur of galley; palm branch over its right 
 shoulder; in field r. A over date; in field 1. 
 PE over club surmounted with monogram of 
 Tyre; monogram between eagle’s legs; bor- 
 der of dots. 
 
 _Mono- De- 
 Date gram nom. Collection 
 
 . VIP 2B 4dr.. Babsaryys Newell foie 
 
 IV). | 
 : : 2dr. .B.M.C.. 7G)a5 ie 
 : 1316-Ja4 . 
 “ Fp 4dr. B.M.C. 76/1; Hunter 9o0/ 
 30; Bab. 1179; Newell; 
 es Nav. X, 1314-5. 
 ‘3 4 2dr. B.M.C. 76/2; Bab. 1178. 
 
 ALP 2B 4dr. Bab. 1186; Nav. X, 1319; 
 
 Newell. 
 
SELEUCID: COINAGE OF TYRE ay 
 
 Date 
 
 Mono- De- 
 
 gram nom. 
 
 99. AIIP Fr... 4dr. 
 
 100. 
 IOI, 
 1G2. 
 
 103. 
 104. 
 
 105. 
 
 106. 
 
 107. 
 
 108. 
 
 109. 
 
 110 
 It! 
 
 eee 
 113: 
 
 II4. 
 II5. 
 116. 
 
 eon 20r: 
 
 2 Dr. 
 hee “adr. 
 if 2dr. 
 a Dr. 
 ZB _ Adr. 
 i a 2dr, 
 Fo 4dr. 
 ae 2dr. 
 M 4dr. 
 Bar, 
 B Adr. 
 se adr. 
 Fe 4dr. 
 : 2dr. 
 
 ' &é Dr: 
 Ni Adr. 
 
 Collection 
 B.M.C. 76/4; Hunter 90/ 
 
 esac bab: 13813: NaveuX, 
 
 1318; Newell (PLATE IV). 
 Newell; Nav, X, 1322. 
 Bav.is7; Nav, 1323. 
 Dov Babs 1182teNave Xk, 
 1320-1; Newell. 
 
 B.M.C. 76/5; Bab. 1185. 
 B.M. 
 
 B.M.; Hunter 90/32; Nav. 
 X, 1328-9; Newell. 
 
 Bab. 1202. 
 
 B.M.C. 76/6; Bab. 1199; 
 Pozzi 3003; Nav. X, 1324; 
 Newell. 
 
 Bvie.76/8; Babs 12003 
 Pozzi 3004; Nav. X, 1325; 
 
 Newell. 
 
 Bab. 1201; Nav. X, 1326; 
 Newell (PLATE IV). 
 
 Nave ss 1327: 
 
 Nav. X, 1336. 
 
 B.M.C. 76/10. 
 
 Hunter 90/34; Bab. 1208; 
 Nav. X, 1333-4; Newell. 
 Hunter 90/36; Bab. 1209. 
 
 »B.M. (Montagu Sale). 
 
 BM.C, -76/ar "Nav. X, 
 1332; Newell (PLATE IV). 
 
28 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 Mono- De- 
 Date gram nom. Collection 
 
 117. ZUP 7s 2dr. Newell (PLATE IV). 
 
 LIS. Fr 4dr. B.M.; Hunter 90/35; New- 
 ell (PLATE IV). 
 
 k1Q: M1 4dr. B.M.C. 76/11; Bab. 1277; 
 Nav. X, 1337-9; Newell 
 (PLATE IV). 
 
 120.5 3 2dr. Nav. X, 1340. 
 
 BRONZE ISSUES. 
 
 121. CHARKOUS 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Demetrius to r.; 
 border of dots. 
 
 Rev. BAXIAEQX AHMHTPIOY *¥ IEP - 
 A¥ in three lines above 
 stern of galley orna- 
 mented by aphlaston; be- 
 low AIIP 189: border of 
 dots. 
 
 E. Rogers grs. 5.90. Bab. Pl. xx, 5 is 
 probably a similar coin as cast M. Babelon 
 has sent me clearly shows; but the date is 
 ‘TIP, it might be EIIP. | 
 
 122. HALF CHALKOUS. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. BAZIAEQ> AHMHTPIOY *¥ IE; in 
 three lines above spur of galley and palm 
 branch; below, AIIP 189; border of dots. 
 
 Bab. 1245; Newell gr.3.49; Rogers gr. 4.08. 
 
SELEUCGCID COINAGE OF TYRE 29 
 
 Pete eaALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Reo, BAZIAHQ> AHMHTPIOY *¥ IEP 
 AX in three lines above galley tol.; below, 
 EIIP 189: border of dots. 
 ihegers- or. 8.58 (Fig. 2, facing p. 4). 
 Newell gr. 6.37, 5.255. 
 2A LP CHALKOUS.* 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to no. 122 but date is EKIIP. 
 Newell gr. 3.82, 2.87. (PLATE IV). 
 124a. HALF CHALKOUS. 
 Obv. Similar. 
 Rev. Similar to 122 but date is CIIP. 
 (Rogers) gr. 3.82 (Fig. 3). 
 
 BEGAL (TYPES IN THE THIRD 
 COINAGE. 
 
 I have ventured to put in a class by themselves 
 certain very exceptional tetradrachms and drachms 
 bearing the symbols and the monograms of the 
 Mint of Tyre, but instead of the usual eagle the 
 Regal types of Athene and Zeus. The weights are 
 Attic and not Phoenician. Evidently it was a small 
 issue, because most of the few dates known today 
 are represented by single specimens. 
 
 Mr. G. F.Hill in the Introduction to the British 
 Museum Catalogue of Phoenicia says, ‘‘It is notice- 
 
 * Bab. 1246-8 belong to Demetrius’ first reign and 
 
 probably also Hunter 90/41 of which only H - P of the 
 date is visible. 
 
30 THE SECOND AND THIRD 
 
 able, also, that the Phoenician silver bears (in ad- 
 dition to the mint-mark or name of Tyre) mono- 
 grams similar to those we find on the later autono- 
 mous silver; but the Attic is not marked in this 
 way. ... Since the coinage with Seleucid types 
 on the reverse does not bear these monograms, it 
 may have been struck in metal drawn from the 
 royal, as distinct from the Tyrian, treasury.” 
 
 In this statement he is however misinformed. All 
 the coins bear such monograms, and Fp , * and M™ 
 are represented. These coins occur in the reigns of 
 Antiochus VII and Demetrius II (second reign); 
 and since tetradrachms of Phoenician weight were 
 also struck not only in the same years, but actually 
 with the same monograms in some cases, the only 
 suggestion I can offer is that the Seleucid King for 
 his own reasons interfered in the routine otherwise 
 usual in the Mint of Tyre. A similar phenomenon 
 is much more common in the Mint of Sidon and 
 from Alexander Balas until Antiochus IX tetra- 
 drachms of Attic weight and regal types appear side 
 by side with the characteristically Phoenician issues. 
 It should be noted that in all these regal issues 
 the portrait of the king is an actual and nowise 
 idealized portrait of Herakles Melquart, vid No. 131, 
 where Demetrius II wears a beard. It is con- 
 ceivable that the exigencies of trade with the rest 
 of the Seleucid Empire rendered such ‘‘equated”’ 
 money advisable, and avoided the necessity of 
 tarifing the common monies. 
 
 I have not been able to trace any copper issues; 
 
See COINAGE OF TYRE 31 
 
 but if it is sound that the copper coinage was in the 
 form of a token coinage—and this the notable dif- 
 ference in weight throughout the whole Seleucid 
 series, in denominations apparently the same, as | 
 have already said, makes extremely likely—then there 
 would naturally be no necessity for any sort of 
 equation beyond mutual goodwill and understand- 
 ing between all parties concerned. As it was a 
 municipal issue the Seleucid king was not concerned. 
 The Catalogue of the series is as follows:— 
 
 ANTIOCHUS VII 
 Peeters 1 ALS. 174-183 
 125. DRACHM. 
 
 Obv. Diademed head of Antiochus to r.; 
 bead and reel border. 
 
 Pee oA? ~ANTIOXOY — Gight 
 downwards), EKYEPPETOY (left down- 
 wards). Winged Nike to 1. holds garland 
 in right hand and the folds of her chiton in 
 left. In field 1. club surmounted by mono- 
 gram of Tyre; in field r. M. In the exergue 
 AOP. Berlin (Zeitschr. f. Num., vol. XXIX, 
 iy; 2), 
 
 TETRADRACHMS. 
 
 Obv. Similar. 
 
 Rev. BASIAEQD ANTIOXOY © (right 
 downwards). HKYEPVETOY (left down- 
 wards). Athene Parthenos, with helmet, 
 double chiton and Aegis stands to |., holdsa 
 
THE SECOND AND Trinh 
 
 little Nike with garland outstretched to |. on 
 her right hand and her lance in her |. which 
 is poised on her shield adorned with the 
 Gorgon’s head. In the exergue date and 
 monogram. In field 1. club surmounted with 
 the monogram of Tyre on r. side of which 
 downwards is IEP; on 1. AS Y. The whole 
 
 is a wreath of laurel with berries. 
 
 Mono- 
 Date gram Collection 
 
 126. HOR Bab. 1113. 
 
 127 Re Fr Bab. 1114-6; Nav. X, 1283. 
 
 (28. LLP hs Nav. X, 1284) 
 
 ico, AIIP = Nav. X, 1285; Fenerly Bey Sale, 
 Pl. xix, 724; Newell (PLATE 
 IV). 
 
 ro. blips Bab. 1130; Nav. X, 1286-7. 
 cf. B.M.C. 75s eeundated, 
 (PLATE IV.) 
 
 134) 
 
 DEMETRIUS II (SEconp REIGN). 
 
 TETRADRACHM. 
 
 Obv. Diademed and bearded head of Demet- 
 rius to r.; bead and reel border. 
 
 Rev. BAXIAKO>D AHMHTPIOY (right 
 downwards), ODHOY NIKATOPO® (left 
 downwards). Zeus Nikephoros enthroned 
 to ]. rests 1. on sceptre. In field 1. club sur- 
 mounted with the monogram of Tyre on r. 
 side of which downwards is IEP, on 1. 
 
SELEUCID COINAGE OF TYRE 33 
 
 A>. Beneath throne, M. In exergue, 
 
 ELIP. 
 Newell (PLATE IV). 
 
 In the foregoing lists the classification of the coin- 
 age of Tyre has been extended from the point at 
 which Mr. Newell left it down through the second 
 reign of Demetrius II with whom the issues of this 
 dynasty at Tyre came to an end (125 B.C.). Cer- 
 tain of the troublesome questions of this series will 
 probably never be settled unless some hoard still 
 to be unearthed provides additional evidence. 
 
. 
 ; 
 id Papel : . 
 rt ¥ : 
 
 vie ae < ¥ 
 tels ; ee he 
 ws ner 
 
 4 y F - 
 . 
 ¥ 
 . 7 - _ 
 é 
 
 % 
 
 Se 
 
 1: 5 
 ¥<e *% 
 
 3 . 
 
 wort edduay 
 a 
 
 ~ 
 * 
 ¥a 
 
 Ps Py ihe fee 
 et et er £ 
 
-— 
 
 ery 
 
 Ce Cae eT aN eee ERT | 
 
 ae 
 * 
 ,) 
 
 +5; 
 
 oinage. 
 
 eutid C 
 : 
 
 \ 
 
 : 
 
 ,> 
 
 ; 
 
 - 
 1 
 
 L | 
 
 VAL dhe 
 
 TYRE—Second S 
 
 if 
 
Plate | 
 
¢ 
 & 
 * 
 a 
 ‘ 
 a 
 * 
 he ‘x 
 bait 7 
 t 
 ts a 
 am, xv 
 + 
 - 
 1 
 ‘ 
 4“ 
 4 
 Pa 
 m 
 » “\ 
 . 
 } \ 
 . ‘ 
 ‘ 
 ‘ 
 ‘hag. 
 4% 
 i ‘ 
 
 es? 
 
; £ . 
 re ; Ge at 
 yh! 
 y 
 » i 
 :! 
 , 
 , 
 2 
 ; ; 
 sae 
 ; ‘ 
 A col) 
 ke 
 ’ * 
 - a 
 
 ‘ he. 
 ; 
 va 
 : 
 
 ’ 
 " pl 
 a 
 7 
 , 4 
 é 
 * 
 
TYRE—Second Seleucid Coinage. 
 
Plate Il 
 
 eee ae ae 
 
 Fi Ma 
 
 F SS ee 
 ee ee ae ee ee ee 
 
ees oe ee 
 
 TYRE—Second Seleucid Colmer: 
 
Plate III 
 
44 eT huKs 
 
 APES PEEL ET E™ ee iy 2! 
 
 ays 
 ‘ 
 .] 
 1 
 
agiuhe > 
 
 \ 
 
 TYRE—Second Sled Coinage. 
 
 118 117 124 
 
Plate IV 
 
 ee 
 
 ee yee ae 
 
 ho init 
 
 119 
 
 116 
 
 109 
 
 131 
 
 130 
 
 129 
 
 ae fee ee 
 
 ee ee eS ee ee ee a ee 
 
—— ll 
 
 CELRURAEP PREGA, 
 
 +." Six 
 4; ook | 
 AY : : }} L h 
 
 bs t 
 
 4 
 4 
 4 
 . 
 
NumisMATiIC NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS — 
 
 1. Sydney P. Noe. Coin Hoards. 1921. a pp. 
 6 pls. 50c. . 
 
 4. Howland Wood. The Mexican Seah croiiaty 
 Coinage. 1913-1916. 1921. 44 pp. 26 pls. 
 $2.00. . ms hint 
 
 6. Agnes Baldwin. Five Roman Gold Medallions. 
 1921. (103 pp. 8 pls. $1.50. 
 
 7. Sydney P. Noe. Medallic Work of A. A. Wein- 
 man eel, ob pp. -17 pls. $1.00... 
 
 8. Gilbert S. Perez. The Mint of the Philippine 
 Islands. 1921. 8pp. 4pls. 50c. 
 
 9. David Eugene Smith, LL.D. Computing Jetons. 
 1920. 40° pp.- -2o° pls: $1.50. 
 
 10. Edward T. Newell. The First Seleucid Coinage 
 of Tyre.: 1921. 40 pp. 8 pls. $1.00, — 
 
 11. Harrold E. Gillingham. French Orders and 
 Decorations. 1922. 110 pp. 35 pls. $2.00. 
 
 12. Howland Wood. Gold Dollars of 1858. 1922. 
 7 pp. 2pls. S50c. 
 
 _B. |. Whitehead. Pre- Mohammedan Coinage of 
 
 x ae 15 pls. $2.00. 
 
 s I of Characene. 
 
 .00. 
 
 +s (A Contribution to 
 
 1922. 234 pp. 13 
 
 porative Coinage of 
 pp. 7 pls. $1.50. 
 Bronze Medallions. 
 
 der Hoards—II. De- 
 
oe t 
 or 
 “ lata. 
 
 32s 
 
 33% 
 
 NuMISMATIC NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS 
 (Continued) 
 
 . Harrold E. Gillingham. Italian Orders of Chivalry 
 
 and* Medals of Honour. 1923. 146 pp. 34 
 pls. $2.00. * 
 
 . Edward T. Newell. Alexander Hoards—III. 
 
 ' Andritsaena. 1924. 39 pp. 6 pls. $1.00. 
 
 . C. T. Seltman. A Hoard from Side. St vis 20 
 
 pp. 3pls. $1.00. 
 
 . R. B. Seager. A Cretan Coin Hoard. 1924. ao 
 
 pp. 12 pls. $2.00. 
 
 . Samuel R. Milbank. The Coinage of Aegina. 
 
 1925. 66 pp. 5 pls. $2.00. 
 
 , Sydney P. Noe. A Bibliography of Greek Coin | 
 
 Hoards. 1925. 275 pp. $2.50. 
 
 . Edward T. Newell. Mithradates of Parthia and 
 
 Hyspaosines of Characene. 1925. 18 pp. 2 pls. 
 wi0e, 
 
 . Sydney P. Noe. The Mende ‘(Raliandes) Hoard, 
 
 1926. 73 pp. 10 pls. $2.00. 
 
 . Agnes Baldwin. Four Medallions from the Arras 
 
 Hoard. 1926. 36 pp. 4 pls. $1.50.. 
 
 D H. Weeendes: Parsons. ‘The Earliest Coins of 
 
 Norway. 1926. 41 pp. 50c. 
 
 . Edward T. Newell. Some Unpublished Coins of 
 
 Eastern Dynasts. 1926. 21 pp. 2 pls. 50c. 
 
 . Harrold E. Gillingham. Spanish Orders of Chival- 
 
 ry and Decorations ef Honour. 1926. 165 pp. 
 40 pls. $3.00. | 
 Sydney P. Noe. The Coinage of Metapontum. 
 1927 (Part I). 134 pp. 23 pls. $3.00. 
 Edward ‘T. Newell. Two Recent. Egyptian 
 Hoards—Delta and Keneh. 1927. 34 pp. 
 3 pls. $1.00.