‘LLEWELLYN 1 j ; i igh 4 Ra! Se hy =k H. : py PUBLICA’ CHAEOLOGY t Yee, i ) ETHNOLOGY. ho Yi ay) x SB) ts UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY The following publications dealing with archaeological and’ ethnological subjects Gael under the direction of the Department of Anthropology are sent in exchange for the publi- cations of anthropological departments and museums, and for journals devoted to general anthropology or to archaeology and ethnology. They are for sale at the prices stated. Exchanges should be directed to The Exchange Department, University Library, Berkeley, California, U. S. A. Ail orders and remittances should be addressed to the rey of California Press. AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY.—A. i. Kroeber and Robert H. Lowie, Vol. 1. ' Vol. 2. Vol..3. Vol, 4. Vol. 5. Vol. 6. Editors. Cited as Univ. Calif. Publ Am. Arch, Ethn, 1.. Life and Culture of the Hupa, by Pliny Earle Goddard. od 1-88, ‘plates 1-300 “Beptentber) FOO so ee eae Nea a eee seks 2. Hupa Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 89-368, March, 1904 Index, pp, 369-378, 1. The Exploration of the Potter Creek Cave, by William J. Sinclair. Pp, oe: eowenncoseeces. 1.27: plates i-14.-s April. 1904 i ek oe Oe ee 2. The Languages ef the Coast of California South of ‘San Francisco, by A..L. Kroeber. Pp. 29-80, with a map.. June, 1904 22d 8. Types of Indian Culture in California, by A. L. ‘Kroeber. Pp. 81-103. June, ) Ee. 0 8 pac eAIl See Ries Oy ara! Salle AERA Mae me Meat DAS Bras Wee Oe RT SL 4, Basket Designs of the Indians ‘of N orthwestern California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 105-164, plates 15-21. ‘January, 1905 220k ee, 5. The Yokuts Language of:South Central California, by. A. L. Kroeber. Pp. \. 165-377. January, 1907 noasteresncncrenannntwnnacraratensttnehentasupeneeecentnnintinastearenenseerantaneesadest Index, pp. 379-392, June, 1905. . 1. The Earliest Historical Relations between Mexico and Japan, from original, documents preserved in Spain and Japan, by Zelia Nuttall. Pp. 1-47. April, 1906222, a AS Se a ea 2 = es eee 2. Contribution to the Physical’ Anthropology of California, tases on collec. - tions in the cet sa ae! of Anthropology of the University of California, — and in the U.S. National Museum, by Ales Hrdlicka. ~ 5 tables, plates 1-10, and map. Jume, 1906: ascot ect ce ecceaneee 8. The Shoshonean Dialects of California, by A. i. Kroeber. Pp. 65-166, FeDrIMary, “UOQOT seo ee ie eS 2 ee ee eee 4, Indian Myths from South Central California, by A. L. Kroeber. 250. “May, 1907... 6. The Washo Language of Hast Central California and “Nevada, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp; 251-818. “September, 1907. —-.2.0.0 a 6. The Religion of the Indians of California, by A. -L. Kroeber. » Pp. 319-356, BSepterm ber, NGO Ts la ea pk er tea ge den pan nang he epee ee aa Index, pp, 357-374. a necewceee ee wan es nes were en conens aces ewes ses suseccsaonecses sone ceea sen weceences coenecerneeeecsecrens a mee c owen enwes se ccceseenencscssenssoce Meccenes pence cr cceneccsemenccesccncos .1. The Phonology of the Hupa Language; Part r The Individual Sounds, ‘by Es Pliny Harle Goddard. Pp, 1-20, plates 1-8. March, 1907. .W0 i. 88. 2. Navaho Myths, Prayers and Songs, with Texts and Translations, by Wash- ington Matthews, edited by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 21-63. Rentatee Mer, LOOT seeks OP ES eT 8 ao aE on, nee eo eee ee oS: Kato Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 65-238, plate 9. December, 1909 4. The Material Culture of the Klamath Lake and ‘Modoc Indians of North- eastern California and Southern Oregon, by S. A. Barrett. Pp. 239-292, -plates 10-25; June, 1910 5. The Chimariko Indians and Language, by Roland B. age: seer een ec meee nner en mnn en ncn eens eres en ecsens connec en ncasanaraceneecwanne ean anemcesacons Pp. 293-380. AMRUSE, TOTO oles TN ee OC a ah a a ee eee sapere ae “Index, pp.. 381-384." 1. The Ethno-Geosraphy of the = 2. The Geography and Dialects of the Miwok Indians, by panues Alfred Barrett, Pp. 333-368, map 3. 8. On the Evidence of the Occupation of Certain Regions by the Miwok VolZ Indians, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 369-380. : i Nos. 2 and 3 in one cover. February, 1908 | SRS thie ah 7 a Index, pp. 381-400, . re 1. The Emeryville Shellmound, by Max Uhle. Pp. 1-106, plates 1-12, with, 38 text -fioures, \Jume T9078 aoe Steere . 2, Recent Investigations bearing upon the Question of the Otcuehes of. Neocene Man in the Anuriferous Gravels of California, by William ca Sinclair. FD. spikes plates 13-14. February, 1908 , #\ The Morphology of the Hupa Language, by Pliny Earle Goddard. $44 pp. | 8 Pp. 49-64, with — Pp ‘167. Pomo “and Neighboring Indians, by. Samuel % Alfred Barrett... Pp. 1-332, maps 1-2. February, 1908 2.0... aed 8 Prices, Volume i, $4.25; Volumes 2 to 11, inclusive, $3.50 each; Volumes 12 to 16,-inclusive, $5.00-each. Volumes 17, 18, 19, and 21 in progress. Volume 20, 95.00. = Mas, 8.00 1.50 | 250 ncoqconeneee yang THE STEGE MOUNDS AT RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA BY LLEWELLYN L. LOUD c hi UNiversITY oF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERIC AND ErHNouocy. Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 35: plates 18, 19, 1 figure in text — Tssued September 19, 1924 ' THE STEGE MOUNDS AT RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA BY LLEWELLYN L. LOUD CONTENTS PAGE Cree VOMM AITO ESIZG7 OL et MGR MOUT Sse). .s see ee cre ea ca eo eteces noes sdeaeeie-aeiaits 355 Sr EOOR LOMB OTe L Men Il OUN GS ees ss ete cet eee ee ete a, eee ht es 358 [SRRPGUT, TROVE WHA S eal oe eles I ees Ree RED othe Od eee eee es ee Pee 360 MRR nM GT) TLC asc pec Se Bes ee Ss ee ee Ate nen ecto ela 361 TESTU SERNA COME RACING ac SR le ae SA OP ee a pr ee A 361 TEU ORES) — ancatene ates e AULD PU AE ee Ee ne eg ROT VT aS oe eer Na ee i? 362 TAGREGE: TIE Daa a Wns es pak a eee ek eRe ee AiR ee SR Geka Co) paee ae Ran ae ea 363 FEMeUCL Brn del anS fOl) OS pea, ee eset ee a et ne Lepr Rae ee hs Ree etn a 365 SORT TENN) Si OIC Sper er ee ER US Ls pee Pa eee Me ae ee ee 365 0 OES ey GRR UAT) | Mp ena aie RINE 20 ie nee en aaa Ee ape onsite Seer eee 366 COMICON ES OWANGID: ap.cches a2 Asa ses eee ae teas 5 SE Dea 8 Fe he Ae Oe RN ees Pal SS 367 SaaS FRYERS HGS TOCES oe tore cso pac deca beoyesacg ane cals tan deveceennabentuetonaaes aoe Aen rear fe 367 CCHONTW EONS, NEES I ake Nea 5 Re ee rt oo nn es Oe ea Re AME 368 PLATES eee LO TOTS CANE (PCS LEB oon cece cade oes isn desmraegan dedig sce tevens anapeeace eres 370 ia eh CMTC MEE PA TIIST ON CS ese en ee 372 FIGURE IN TEXT Rem REE RELI EOL LOLS TOUTS ges gsc goede ne ec ch ep tee Sac encase Sr 357 LOCATION AND SIZE OF THE MOUNDS The Oakland—Richmond. beaches.—Directly opposite the outlet of San Francisco bay, from Point Richmond on the north to Goat island on the south, lies an area 6 miles long and 3.5 miles wide, where the depth of water does not exceed 12 feet at low tide.1 This area was excellent for fishing in primitive times, as is proved by the number of net sinkers found in mounds on the shore. Some of the largest shell- mounds of the bay region occupied this stretch of shore, not altogether because the fishing there was good and the extensive tide flats suitable for obtaining mollusks, but rather because these advantages were not, as in many other tracts, counterbalanced by the disadvantage of wide areas of marsh lands. 1 Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., xiv, 20, 1914, gives the area of San Francisco bay as 400 square miles exclusive of Suisun bay, Carquinez straits, and several large salt-water estuaries. 356 University of California Publcations in Am. Arch. and Ethn. [Vol.17 The largest mound, that at Ellis Landing, at the foot of Eleventh street, Richmond, had a diameter of about 475 feet, and was probably, in former times, at least 30 feet deep. Excavations have been made and the results published by Nelson.? One mile to the east, at Stege, within the city limits of Richmond, le several moderate-sized mounds, which are dealt with in the present paper. Near the center of the Oakland—Richmond beach, at West Berkeley, about 444 miles from Ellis Landing, is a large mound, 20 feet in depth. This mound has been excavated, but the results are as yet unpublished. About 2 miles farther south is the Emeryville mound, 310 feet in diameter and 32 feet in depth, described by Uhle.* Other mounds in the vicinity* are not mentioned in this paper. The Harborgate tract.—In the autumn of 1915, a real estate com- pany laid out the streets and did the grading on the Harborgate tract in the city of Richmond and the writer, aided by Mr. Leonard Outhwaite, spent sixteen days watching the operations of plow and seraper as they leveled one of the Stege mounds at the foot of Twenty- fifth street and part of a larger mound at the foot of Twenty-seventh street. Only two men, with a single team of horses, were engaged in removing the mounds; consequently their work extended over a number of months. Operations had proceeded several weeks before the writer arrived, and were continued until both mounds were entirely leveled. About 550 artifacts—only a part—were secured, including perhaps 150 beach specimens washed out of the larger mound at high tides. Between 1910 and 1914, the writer had collected about 50 objects on the beach, and in 1922, 300 additional specimens were obtained.° Mound no. 300.—According to the system of numbering the shell- mounds of San Francisco bay initiated by Nelson and adopted by the Department of Anthropology,® the larger mound of the Stege. or Harborgate tract is number 300. It indicates the block bounded by Twenty-seventh street, Montgomery street, Twenty-eighth street, and the present water front (fig. 1). The mound was elliptical in outline SN. & Nelson, The Ellis Landing Shellmound, this series, vil, 357-426, 1910. 3 Max Uhle, The Emeryville Shellmound, this series, vir, 1-106, 1907. 4 See figure 1, also the map in N. C. Nelson, Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Region, this series, vil, 301-356, 1909. 5N. C. Nelson, The Ellis Landing Shellmound, op. cit., 365, states that, in the course of twenty years, the shore at the Ellis Landing mound has been eroded to a width of about 200 feet by wave action. This is perhaps due to gradual subsidence. 6 Part of the numbers are shown on the map in N. C. Nelson, Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Region, op. cit. 1924 | . Loud: The Stege Mounds at Richmond, California 357 with the long axis of 475 feet parallel to the shore. The minor diameter before erosion of one side by high tides was probably not greatly in excess of 350 feet. Because of the transporting effect of the waves, there was a small shell bar near the eastern end of the mound. Near the center of the mound, and at about its highest point, the writer and Mr. Outhwaite excavated a shaft some 5 feet in diameter Es SEAVER AVE. § BS i : BATTERY ST. MONTGOMERY S Dotted line of mound no. 297 on the Owens tract indicates area of shell after leveling by real estate operations; broken line shows approximate original area of the mound. Dotted line of mound no. 300 incloses area which was partially removed previous to archaeological work. A, Test hole, 20 in. depth of black marsh muck to level of salt water. B, 3 ft. of shell to salt water. C, 20 in. of shell to clay. D, Shaft, 9 ft. of shell to clay and 11.5 ft. to water level. Solid line E—F, bounds of high tides, 1922. Broken line E—-F, approximate bounds of high tides, 1915. Mound no. 298, the smaller Stege mound, leveled 1915. 29 th St ee FIG. 1. MAP OF STEGE MOUNDS in order to determine the depth of the shell deposit. This was found _to be 9 feet. The definitely marked bottom was clay. Water was encountered after digging through 214 feet of the clay. The water was at approximately sea level, as the fluctuation with the tide was not great. Mound no. 298.—The smaller mound, at the foot of Twenty-fifth street, measured about 240 by 160 feet. A shaft was dug near the 358 University of California Publcations in Am. Arch. and Ethn. [Vol.17 center, but the bottom of the shell deposit was somewhat indistinct. A sample taken at a depth of 6 feet is a black muck containing a slight amount of shell. Whether the black material is an Indian deposit or not, it is safe to say that the entire depth of the mound did not exceed 7 feet. A sample of pure clay was obtained at a depth of 8 feet. Mound no. 297.—Another shellmound, leveled before 1915, was situated in the Owens addition, across a small salt-water slough, two or three hundred feet north of mound no. 300. To judge from the scattered shell, it possibly covered nearly as much area as no. 298, though probably it was not so deep. Mound no. 299.—To the south of Hamilton avenue, between Twenty-ninth and Thirtieth streets, about 500 feet to the northeast of mound no. 300, is a fourth site. It covers an area of about 350 by 250 feet, paralleling the head of a small slough between mounds nos. 800 and 298. The deposit, which is largely black dirt with a limited amount of shell, is probably more than 3 feet deep, as an uprooted tree near the northeast perimeter reveals a deposit 2 feet in depth. No further report is made here on mounds nos. 297 and 299. COMPOSITION OF THE MOUNDS Shell.—Although the proportion of each molluscan species would appear to be about the same for the two Stege mounds, there are some differences. The principal constituent of both mounds was mussel shell (Mytilus edulis) with smaller quantities of bent-nosed clam (Macoma nasuta), oyster (Ostrea lurida), heart-shell (Cardiuwm corbis), and a few rarer species.’ It was found in digging the shaft in the larger mound that there was much less clam and more oyster shell at a depth of 3 to 5 feet than in the upper 3 feet. In fact, oyster shell was rare in the upper 3 feet, but continued in considerable abundance below that depth to the bottom. However, mussel was the principal constituent at all depths. Calcined shell was not observed in the larger mound. Neither were ashes conspicuous, except for one streak 2 inches in thickness The only species especially noticed were: 24 specimens of a univalve, Purpura crispata; 4 specimens of large mussel, Mytilus californianus; and 3 specimens of abalone, Haliotis rufrescens. In excavations at the Ellis Landing mound still other species were encountered. See N. ©. Nelson, op. cit., 376. E. W. Gifford, Composition of California Shellmounds, this series, x1, 1-29, 1916, shows that the typical mounds of San Francisco bay, like those described in the present paper, contain about 30 to 40 per cent of mussel. 1924 ] Z Loud; The Stege Mounds at Richmond, California 359 close to the bottom, at a depth of 9 feet. On the other hand, patches of ashes and calcined shell were numerous in the smaller mound. In one bed of calcined shell and ashes 8 or 10 feet in diameter about 2 feet below the surface, there were 70 lumps of baked pink clay moulded in small mussel shells. This clay might possibly have served as a paint of poor quality. Human bones.—Skeletal material was abundant in the larger mound, but almost entirely lacking in the smaller. There was an abundance of calcined shell in the smaller mound, so that possibly cremation of the dead was here resorted to. The larger mound showed one case of probable cremation, the incomplete skeleton of a young person, no. 12-3448. The bones were found in a heap and show slight signs of calcination. Mammal bones.—Both mounds held a fair abundance of mammal bones, principally from marine mammals such as seals and sea otter, with a trifling representation of deer, coyote, and other land mammals. Among the rarer bones was a large whale vertebra found in the larger mound.$ Bird bones.—Bird bones are of interest because of their unusual numerical importance in the smaller mound. They were so plentiful that only a small proportion was saved. About a third of those brought to the University consisted of ulnae, radii, and tibiae whose ends had been broken off. These are the bones most commonly used for making beads and whistles. Examination of the collections from other mounds reveals that these bones usually have the extremities broken off.° Fish bones.—Only 17 specimens of fish bones were large enough to attract attention and be saved. However, the presence of fish bones in any mound is best revealed in the finer siftings of material. That the larger mound was preéminently the location of a fishing village is proved by the large quantities of net sinkers, 61 per cent of all artifacts being such implements. As relatively fewer sinkers but many more bird bones were found in the smaller mound, an interesting contrast of mode of life is apparent. Rocks and pebbles.—If a study of all the San Francisco bay mounds should be made from the viewpoint of a geologist, it is prob- 8 For a list of mammal species represented in the neighboring mounds at Ellis Landing and Emeryville, see N. C. Nelson, op. cit., 378; Max Uhle, op. cit., 18. 9 Immense quantities of both bird and mammal bones are to be found in the Emeryville mound, but the only species of birds identified are geese, the canvas- back duck (Aythya valllisneria), and the cormorant (Phalaerocoras). See Max Uhle, op. cit., 18. Five artifacts from Stege were made from radii and ulnae of pelicans. 360 , University of California Publeations in Am. Arch. and Ethn. [Vol. 17 able that each mound would reflect the character of the rocks to be found within a radius of less than five miles. Few regions show a greater variety of either sedimentary or igneous rocks, and mounds no farther apart than Emeryville and Stege apparently differ con- siderably. As an example of the multiplicity of rocks in this region, the creek bed at the mouth of Wildcat canon, three miles from the mounds here described, is littered with boulders of all sizes up to twelve feet in diameter. In a space less than 500 feet long rhyolite, greenstone schist, serpentine, actinolite, glaucophane schist, quartz, calcite, and other minerals are readily found. These as well as other varieties are present in quantities on the beach, where they have been washed out by the tides. They are for the most part uninjured by fire, a condition in marked contrast to the burnt stones found on the beach at Ellis Landing. No fireplaces or heaps of cooking stones were found at Stege, though such are commonly met with in other mounds. In the shaft of the larger Stege mound small pebbles were abundant from the top to the bottom. HUMAN REMAINS In the smaller mound, only 8 human bones are known to have been found. These include 2 adult femora, 2 adult humeri, and 2 infant bones. But in the few days of plow operations observed in the larger mound the skeletons of 11 individuals were exposed and 5 others were revealed by the digging and caving in of the shaft. Of these one case is of special interest. Incomplete skeleton, no, 12-3445, of a person about 20 years old, with a diseased left femur, due to a wound in the hip bone, half an inch from the socket, where there is a fragment of imbedded obsidian. The obsidian point is broken off even with the bone, the dimensions of the exposed surface being 5 by 8mm. An X-ray picture of the bone indicates that it was penetrated by the arrow point to the depth of 13 mm. The arrow, at the time of striking, was descending at an angle of about 30 degrees from the horizontal. The con- dition of the bone surrounding the socket, as well as the condition of the head of the femur, indicates that the person lived possibly a year after he was wounded.1° Suly, VOUT o.ecuc.t ne ccln espn k nee steed c eben cece enente lananaayancnnanseeseseenen il. Pomo Bear Doctors, by S. A. Barrett. Pp. 443-465, plane a. uly, TOL Lia . UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS— (Continued) .Pomo Indian Basketry, by S. A. Barrett... Pp. 133-306, plates 15-30, 231 ext LeUures.. Decomberyt908 8 ws et ha ks oc Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Region, by N. C. Nelson. Pp. 309- 856, plates 82-32: December), 1908 csc he The Ellis Landing Shellmound, by N.C. Nelson, Pp. 357-426, plates 36-50, PALS TOTO pee ore Daas A Sn ON ie ee te es ar Os he 2 mS. Index, pp. 427-443. . A Mission Record of the California Indians, from 2 Manuscript in the Bancroft Library, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp, 1-27. May, 1908 02. . the Ethnography of the Cahuilla Indians, by A. L:. Kroeber. Pp. 29- 68, wren ead n atm anna = weer nena nn nen nena n enn st een enna ne cenn sass enseevenseccsseseneneuee ’ plates 1-15. July, 1908 . The Religion of the Luiseho and Dieguefio Indians of Southern California, by Constance Goddard Dubois, -Pp. 69-186, plates 16-19, June, 1908 ........ . Lhe Culture of the Luisefio Indians, by Philip Stedman Sparkman. Pp. 187- eon Date. 2O,t ANLUSt, LOO EL eae ks Mel The TT Ie ee Notes on Shoshonean Dialects of Southern California, by A. L. Kroeber. Rn B35 -260.5:! MODTEUGI. OL OOO Plan i re Ue on ae > The Religious Practices of the Dieguefio Indians, by T..T. Waterman: Pp. Bit-35s8; plates. 22s eaten) LOTO) Best i Lea a ee, ae Index, pp, 359-369. Yana Texts,.by Edward Sapir, together with Yana Myths collected by “Roland: B: Dixon. \Ppri-235: Febriiary, P9108 200k 2h ee ic ale . The Chumash and. Costanoan Languages, by A.-L. Kroeber. Pp. 237-271, PN OVOHMI DEE Cus 10s ee BN ae I rea Se 5 OS ae) 6 ee The Languages of the Coast of California North of San Francisco, by A. i. eKroeper, ) Pp; 273-495, and “map.” “April, 19Lb 220 es ee as ~ Index, ‘pp. 437-439. ‘ Phonetic Constituents of the Native Languages of California, by A. ZL. Wroever.. Pp. VOOM SLOT Oe a ee el eae . The Phonetic Elements of the Northern Paiute Language, by T. T. Water- man, Pp. 13-44, plates 1-5... November, 19110 200 Phonetic Elements of the Mohave Language, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 45-96, MlabOs: 6-LOONOWeMpDEr a 1d Ae RT SCT Deh he a 2 The Ethnology of the Salinan Indians, by J., Alden Mason. Pp. 97-240, MOLAGOS) BAS 0< DECRIYDET A LOT OA ere ee Geet oe hen See or padonp at peegen Papago Verb Stems, by- Juan Dolores. Pp. 241-263, ‘August, AOL ck a! Notes on the Chilula Indians of Northwestern Oalifornia, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 265-288, plates 38-41. April, 1914 . PA or eaten AU Blab Chilula Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 289-379. N ovember, 1914. ~~. Index, pp. 381-385. Index, Pp. 467-478. 1.00 05 1,00 2 eR UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS— (Continued) mere Vol.18; 1. The Position of Yana in the Hokan Stock, by E. Sapir. Pp. 1-34. July, Pwo te 2 & a BAY (ESA tl AM Na ie SNe Dee Wie Aceh aDeAn ARC Be OE RON MERA EN Oe Dal aA UES OULER DEM RE a as TT BB OT ey 2. The Yana Indians, by T. T. Waterman. Pp. 35-102,. plates 1-20. February, abl ee we BER NYA a PEE et Wants Seem CANIN Alo da cate pee Wa ed Oa (oe pean MME Wine No NUE. jcicakied ae ana 8. Yahi Archery, by Saxton T.’Pope. Pp. 103-152, plates 21-37. March, 1918 .75. 4, Yana Terms of Relationship, by Edward Sapir. Pp. 153-173... March, 1918 (125 fds Ee oe 5, The Medical History of Ishi, by Saxton T. Pope. Pp. 175-213, plates 38-44, y Bes ark 8 figures in’ text. “May 1820 «ity et ee a eee ee 45 ve 6. The Fundamental Elements of Northern Yana, by Edward Sapir. Pp 215- : Ber Ene Zo4.' | Apprdd) LOLA OM Ny eh Ne Dae Te SN ORE I ey ae yas 7. Functional Families of the Patwin, by Ww. C: McKern. Pp. 235- 258, “April, HIN 7 ‘i e YS pA I eee nna CORE ANE Cita oA ll Aad eae ch, he eae ANN Fo er MLE WE UNE elcr Vis sil 2: SOR a 8. Elements of Culture in Native Gautonnis, by A. L, Kroeber. Pp. 259-328, By BOS FF Ge with 4 maps.) November; 2922) a.0 5 las ls eee 3.0088 9, A Study of Bows and Arrows, by Saxton T. Pope. Pp. 329-414, plates ABR fe, G4. AUS USGS BOOS 31 rs ie oy Oe A ce 2 se ese a Oe Ne ee (L7G Ke Vol.14. 1. The Language of the Salinan Indians, by J. Alden Mason. Pp. 1-154. Re SAMREY LODE. pies eg Se eh A Tee a 7 BAO eh TET 2, Clans and Moieties' in Southern California, by Edward Winslow Gifford. Poot Pp. 155-219, 1 figure in text./March; 1918 oo... elect scent capeneawesen PERE LUA 3. Ethnogeography and Archaeology of the Wiyot Territory, by Llewellyn 4 PE OND Prdy Loud. Pp. 221-436, plates 1-21, 15 text figures. December, 1918 ..2.... (2.50 ps, MEE 4. The Wintun Hesi Ceremony, by ’s. A. Barrett. Pp. 437-488, Plates 22-23, 0° fe 8 figures in text,” Mareh,,1919° "aes a a ale eaten 5 oS 5. The Genetic Relationship. of ‘the North American Indian” Languages, by oa Paul Radin. Pp. 489-502, May,1919 0.0002... FUSS pas MBLC FaGMEE : 18 eA Ve Index, pp. 503-506,” d Rs see ° VoL 15. 1. Ifugao Law, by BR. F. Barton. Pp. 1-186, plates 1-33. Pebrukey 1919. sntees’ | B00. (OMS 25 2. Nabaloi: Songs, by C. RB: Moss and A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 187-206. May, 1919 | t peO aie “ 3. Nabaloi Law and Ritual, by C. R. Moss. Pp. 207-342, plates: BEST: October, 175 ie kr gS 2 Raa ee Pees MANS oa) ean PANTS ek PSN IE a OIE Mey GAR Roe nae ET Salo g Mig SEC a ee ties Bi Veal? 4, Kankanay Ceremonies, by C. RB. Moss. Pp. 343-384. ‘Oceabay, 1920 fans Bcd * - 6. Ifugao Economics, by R. F. Barton. Pp.'385-446, plates 38-45. feos 1998 100 Vol. 16. 1. Myths of the Southern Sierra Miwok, by S. A. Barrett. Pp. 1-28. Mery gab: © ang VOTO 6 ye ath Ee ok ee a ae ae a ee a “$0 BA 2. The Matrilineal Complex, by Robert H. Lowie. Pp. 29-46. March, 1919...” a 15 hae 1a? 8. The Linguistic Families of California, by Roland B. Dixon and A. L.. a ee Ney Kroeber. Pp, 47-118, map 1, 1 figure in text. September, 1919... AT foe aK 4, Calendars of the Indians North of Mexico, by Leona ‘Cope. -Pp. At: 176, Wy Sires with:$ maps.. November, 1919/2.) Se oe eh ee eae me oy a 5. Yurok Geography, by T. T. Waterman. Pp. 177.314, "plates: 1-16, 1 text figure, 84°maps, ‘\MEty) E920 40 8! ie i ee ee aueseee sretnatantetben 2.00 y 6.. The Cahuilla Indians, by Lucile Hooper. Pp. 315. 380. April, 1920 0.00)... Raita et: 2.75. i; if xs 7. The Autobiography of a Winnebago Indian, by Paul Badin. | BAe 381473, sobs PVT TOZQ) Ee Rp Ly i Re J ag A Ge ee ee es “1.00 eS 8. Yuman Tribes of the Lower Colorado, by A. L. Kroeber. “Pp. “A756 485) a. oa fy 1 Aree TODOS iF ee ae ee oy ee ee Ne [eae ne ee li . The Sources and Authenticity of the History of the Ancient iexicang, by Paul Radin: Pp. 1-150, 17 plates. June, 1920) 20. se onc 2. California Culture: Provinces, by A. L. Kroeber.. “Bp. 151169, 2 maps. September; 192070 ei Maa a eee ee i oe ge cea a. oD 3. Winter and Summer Dance Series in Zuiii in 1918, by Hisie Clews Parsons. rhe A Pp. 171-216, 2 figures in text.” August,1922 | je ae lect etesehoe Vol. 17. 4, Habitat of the Pitch Indians, a: Wailaki Division, by Pliny Earle Goddard. ei mae Pp. 217-225, 3 figures in text. February, 1924 4.000... AS pieces 25 os 5. Nabaloi Tales, by C. R. Moss. Pp. 227-353. “September, 1924 ey eeaelt Side) pdt LT. 6, The Stege Mounds at Richmond, California, by Llewellyn. L. Juetd. ‘ius 355-372, plates 18, 19, 1 figure in text. September, L924 AN as Vol. 18: 1. Californian Kinship Terminologies, by Edward Winslow Gifford. Bp. 1385, with’29 maps, | December, 1922: 755.2 sa ON eager ec aeenta ie Vol. 19. 1. Wappo Texts, First Series, by Paul Radin. Pp. 1-147. February, joes Vol. 20. The Phoebe Apperson Hearst Memorial Volume. xvi a 389 PP, zi plates, | ; 22 figures, in text.’ December, 1928) ..2i'e 0. ua eee : 5.00 Vol. 21; 1. The Uhle Collections from Chincha, by A. L. Kroeber ana William Duncan os A §$trong. Pp, 1-54, plates 1-24, 27 figures in text. - i 2. Explorations at Chincha, by Max Uhle. Pp. 55-94, 1 figure in text Nos. 1 and 2 in one cover. jrenaecners 1924 bates nee "e>> fia) a ise Note.—The University of California Publications are slotvarad in exchange. for the ‘publ. eations of learned societies and institutions, universities and libraries. _ Complete lists of — all the publications of the University will be sent upon request. For sample copies, of publications or other information, address the MANAGER OF THE ‘UNIVERS TTY ‘Mb PRESS, BERKELEY, | ‘CALIFORNIA, 'U, S. A. _ Al matter sent in pear Y should: Ey, AGE Cat ORNS U.S. A.