oe Wing es ec aee ne SYLLOGE OF ANCIENT UNEDITED COINS OF GREEK CITIES AND KINGS. SYLLOGE OF ANCIENT UNEDITED COINS OF GREEK CITIES AND KINGS, FROM VARIOUS COLLECTIONS PRINCIPALLY IN GREAT BRITAIN. JAMES MILLINGEN, Esq. R. A. R. S. L. CORRESPONDENT OF THE ACADEMY OF INSCRIPTIONS AND BELLES-LETTRES OF THE ROYAL INSTITUTE OF FRANCE, ETC. LONDON. PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR. MDCCCXXXVII. DDE a aa ANCIENT COINS OF GREEK CITIES AND KINGS. CORFINIUM in PELIGNIS. 1. ITALIA. Female head crowned with laurel. Rev. Q. SILO. Before an erect spear, symbol of Mars, a man kneeling holds a pig intended for sacrifice : eight chiefs of the Italian states, four on each side, swear on the victim to be faithful to the common cause. AR. 3. Plate I, n. 1. (M. Prosper Dupré, Paris ). , 2. Female head crowned with laurel. Obv. ITALIA. Victory seated, holding a branch of laurel. AR: 3. Plate I, n. 2. (Same collection. ) r The first of these silver denarii presents the same types as those frequently seen on the coins issued by the Confederacy of the Italian peoples in the course of the Social war (1). The female head on the obverse is that of Italy personified (2). The reverse represents the ceremony observed when the different chiefs of the Confederacy were assembled to sanction their alliance by a solemn oath and sacrifice. The number of the chiefs which appear on the coin agrees with that of the states, which, according to Strabo (3), were the Picentes, Vestini, Marrucini, Peligni, Frentani, Marsi, Samnite, Lucani. (1) Saggi del?’ Academia di Cortona, tom. II, to that which I proposed on a former occasion. pag. 49, tom. IV, pag. 133. —Ecxuerx. Doct. Num. V. Recueil de Quelques Médailles Grecques Inédites. Vet., tom. I, pag. 103. Rome, 1812, pag. 31. (2) This opinion is preferable in every respect (3) Lib. V, pag. 241. Tar. Lry. Epit., lib, LXXTI, I (2) The present coin possesses peculiar interest, as, in addition to the usual legend ITALIA, it offers the name of one of the most distinguished of the Italian generals, Quintus Pompedius Silo, who is here designated only Q. SILO, the gentile name being omitted. When the Italian nations who had long solicited in vain the freedom of Rome were informed of the death of the tribune Drusus, they lost all hopes of obtaining justice by negotiations, and resolved to assert their rights by force of arms. Having previously concerted the mea- sures requisite, for such an important enterprise, they selected Corfi- nium (4), a city of the Peligm, for their principal place of arms, and intending it to become, instead of Rome, the capital of Italy, they gave st the name of Italicum. They then constituted a government in imi- tation of that of Rome, forming a senate of five hundred members, out of which they elected two consuls and twelve pretors. The first consuls chosen were Quintus Pompzdius Silo and Caius Papius Mutilus. The former is described as possessing the chief autho- rity among the Marsi, one of the most warlike of the Italian nations; but it is uncertain whether this authority arose from any political functions with which he was invested, or from the ascendant acquired by his emi- nent qualities.. In the course of the negotiations which took place during ihe tribunate of Drusus, he was the principal agent, and an instance of his zeal and enterprising spirit on this occasion has been adduced by Diodorus (5). Having assembled a numerous band of adventurers, or men involved in crimes and apprehensive of punishment ( Diodorus says ten thousand ), he provided them with arms concealed under their cloaks, and, placing himself at their head, set out for Rome. His in- tention was to surround the senate with his followers, and to obtain by intimidation the concessions required ; or, in case of refusal, to pro- ceed to the last extremity, and overturn the government. Being met, (4) Srrazo, lib. V, page 241.—Droporvs Srcurvs, Latin tongue, may be considered as struck at Cor- Ecloge, lib. XXXVIL, cap. 1. — Vexreius Parer- finium. cuxus, lib. XL, cap. 15. Hence the coins, inscribed Italia in the Osean or (5) Excerpta, lib. XXXVII, cap. 1- (3) however, on the road by C. Domitius, who represented to him the imi- policy and rashness of the enterprise, he was induced to desist and return home. After the death of the tribune, when all prospect of an amicable adjustment had vanished, Pompedius was the most active and chief instigator of the war; and, by his influence, the Marsi were the first people to commence hostilities: whence the name of Marsic was frequently given to the Social war (6). Unfortunately, we possess little information respecting this most in- teresting period of Roman history. The books of Livy, which contain- ed a full and without doubt authentic account of the Social war having perished, we have only the relation of Appian, which is very confused and offers great difficulties, and those of the various abbreyiators, in which some scattered facts, but no continuate account of it, can be col- lected. Hostilities having commenced (A. U. C. 664), the consuls L. Julius Cesar and P. Rutilius Lupus led two armies against the insurgents (7). The first was opposed to Q. Pompedius, who, with six other generals, had the command in the districts to the North and West; while C. Rutilius was opposed to C. Papius, who was intrusted with the defence of Sam- nium and the districts to the South and East. At this critical moment all the chances of success seemed in favour of the Romans. Their armies were commanded by generals of consummate experience in the art of war, and who had’ acquired a high reputation by numerous victories, while the Italian leaders had never held the supreme command, and had only acted in subordinate stations, as allies of the Romans. The diffe- rence of interests and of views, inseparable from confederacies, were ad- ditional advantages in favour of the Romans. Notwithstanding these appearances, the first’ campaign, though ba- lanced by various success, offered a result favourable to the Italian cause. The genius and energy of the Italian chiefs, particularly of Quintus (6) Srraso, lib. V, pag. 241. (7) Apptan. de Bello Civili, lib. I, cap. 40. ¥ = (4) Pompedius, surmounted all the difficulties they had to encounter. It would be foreign to the present purpose to detail the operations of the war; but a short notice of those in which Pompedius was en- gaged may not be displaced. : At the opening of the campaign, Perpenna, a lieutenant of the consul Rutilius, was defeated with considerable loss; and the consul himself, having imprudently risked a battle near the Liris, fell into'an ambuscade, in which he lost a great number of men, and was mortally wounded (8). Marius, his heutenant, saved the rest of the army, and, by a skilful movement, made himself master of the enemy’s camp, and obliged the Italian army to retreat. The troops commanded by Rutilius were then divided be- tween Marius and Cepio; and Pompedius, with a reinforcement, took thé command of the army opposed to them. The two armies were for some time in presence without coming to a general action; some skirmishes only took place, in one of which Czpio having gained a small advantage, his natural presumption was greatly increased. Fertile of expedients, and skilful to employ stratagem or force as occasion required, Pompedius, who had studied the character of his opponent, resolved to turn it to his advantage. Leaving his army, he went over to the Roman camp, taking with him two children of servile condition, richly clothed as his own, and feigning to be discontented with the Roman senate, surrendered himself to Cepio. To gain the greater credit, he brought with him large bars of lead covered with gold and silver, which he deposited, as his treasure, in the hands of Cepio. At the same time, he urged him to attack the Italian army while deprived of its leader, and offered himself to be his guide. Czpio gladly accepted the proposal, and when he had brought the army near a place where the Italians had stationed an ambuscade, Pompzdius, under pretence of reconnoitring the enemy, rode up to an eminence, and from thence gave the appointed signal to his troops, who instantly sallied forth upon the Romans, and defeated them with great slaughter (9). Czepio (8) Arrray, de Bello Civili, lib. I, cap. 43. Ed. Mai, tom. II, pag. 108.—Tur. Lryrus, Epit., (9) Drovor. Srcut., lib, XXXV. Fragm. Vatican. lib. LX XIII. — Appran, lib. I, cap. 44. (5 ) himself was slain. At his death, the command of the entire army of Rutilius devolved to Marius. After his successful enterprise against Cepio, it appears that Pompe- dius, always indefatigable, marched with a corps of his army to another part of the line of operations, where his presence was required : whether it was to cover the siege of Acerra, or to check the progress of. the enemy towards Asculum and Firmum, cannot be ascertained. During his absence, his lieutenants, with three divisions, attacked the Roman camp, but were repulsed and driven into some vineyards, where Marius, fearing an ambuscade, did not venture to pursue’ them (10). Sylla, however, who was encamped on another side of the vineyards, attacked the enemy, who lost six thousand men in the two actions. Pompeedius, returning with reinforcements, now resumed the command of the Italian army. Opposed to the most renowned leaders, he frequently offered battle to the enemy; but Marius, fearing the skill and artifices of his adversary, remained inactive within his intrenchments , and con- stantly declined an action. On this occasion, Marius did not justify the expectation of success which six consulships and his numerous victories and triumphs had created. Plutarch (11) supposes him to have been enervated by age, or labouring under ill health. The season for mili- tary operations being ended, the two parties went into’ winter quarters. The result of the campaign having proved favourable to the Confede- rates, the Etruscans, Umbrians, and other Italian states, who hitherto had taken no part in the war, were preparing to join the allies. But the policy of the Senate averted this new danger; and, by passing a law proposed by the consul L. Julius Cesar, which eranted the freedom of the city to all the Italians who had remained faithful, or should submit to Rome, they not only prevented fresh insurrections, but damped the ardour of the Confederates, and produced a relaxation of their exertions, which proved highly injurious to their cause. In the second year of the war (A. U.C. 665), Cn. Pompeius Strabo and (10) Arrray, lib. I, cap. 46. (11) Prorarou, in Mario, cap. 33. (6) L. Porcius Cato were elected consuls, and hostilities recommenced with increased vigour. At first, fortune was favourable to the Confederates, and the consul Porcius Cato was defeated and slain in an engagement with the Marsi (12). Subsequently however, the consul Pompeius, Metellus, Mu- rena, and particularly} Sylla, obtained repeated advantages; and, before the end of the campaign, the Peligni, Vestini, Marrucini, and even the Marsi, enfeebled by repeated losses (13), were successively induced to submit to the Romans, and the consul Pompeius Strabo had the honours of a triumph. After the submission of the Vestini, Corfinium having been occupied by the Romans, the Confederates made Aesernia, in Samnium, their ca- pital and principal place of arms, and gave the supreme command to Pompzdius, who, notwithstanding the defection of his countrymen, re- mained faithful to the common cause.’ About this period, the allies entered into negotiations with Mithri- dates, and solicited his assistance, but with little success : his answer to the Italian embassy was, that he would himself pass over into Italy, after he had terminated the war in Asia. In the following year (A.U.C. 665), the Confederates being disheartened by repeated losses, and reduced to great distress by the devastation of their lands, new levies were raised with difficulty. Pompzdius, by his efforts, succeeded however in raising an army of thirty thousand men, to which twenty thousand emancipated slaves were added. With these forces he retook Bovianum, the strongest fortress of Samnium, and this success so elated the hopes of the Confederates, that they decreed the honours of a triumph. to Pompeedius, who made his entry into the captured city m ‘a triumphal car. An unfortunate omen remarked on _ this . occasion, portended fatal consequences (14), which were too soon ve- rified. Having attacked the army of /Emilius Mamercus, he was repulsed with loss, and subsequently, in a battle with Metellus, near Teanum, . he died fighting valiantly; and his army, deprived of its leader, was (12) ‘Trr. Liv., Epit., lib. LXXY. (14) Juxrvs Oxsnqumns, de Prodigiis, cap. 116. (13) Ipem, Epit., lib. LXXVI. CP?) routed and dispersed (15), As the war originated with Pompzedius, so it ended by his death, and all hopes of Italian independance expired with this great man (16). N. 9. This denarius, like others of the Italian Confederacy, presents types imitated from Roman consular coins. The obverse and reverse are here perfectly similar to those of the denarii and quinarii of the Porcian family, inseribed M. CATO. ROMA, or sometimes M. CATO. PROPR. ROMA; and on the reverse, VICTRIX. Instead of this legend, we have here ITALIA. The denarii and quinarii in question have hitherto been attributed to the great Cato, but with different opinions respecting the time when they were coined (17). Some antiquaries ascribe them to the questorship of Cato, when he was sent to collect the treasures of Ptolemy in Cy- prus; others, to the period of the civil war in Africa. Eckhell left the question undecided (18). But recent discoveries of several large hoards of consular coins have thrown light on the subject, and led to the inference, that the coins in question were not all struck at one period; but at different times, by two or more individuals of the Porcian family, invested with military appointments. This circumstance is incontest- ably proved by the present coin, which, being struck during the Social war (i.e. between 664 and 666 A. U. C.), is of a time when Cato, who was born in 658, was not more than six or eight years of age. In fact, Plutarch has recorded an instance of the stern inflexibility of character (anima atrox ) displayed by Cato, when Pompedius Silo playing fa- miliarly with him, held him out of a window, and threatened to let him fall, if he would not solicit his uncle Drusus in favour of the Italian interests (19). Farther particulars respecting the denarii in (15) P. Orosrus, lib. V, cap. 18. — Tir. Lrv., cap. 18; Auctor de Vir. Illust., in Metello Pio, 63, Epit., lib, LXXVI. et Catone, 80, etc. (16) Additional testimonies to the eminent mili- (17) Morzx, Num. Famil., IV, A. B. C. D. tary and political talents of Pompzdius may be seen (18) Doct. Num. Vet., tom. V, pag. 236. in Prurarcu, de Fort. Roman., pag. 321,45; VxEzr- (19) Vita Catonis, cap. 2, — Varertus Maximus, tris Parercutus, lib. II, cap. 1; Fronvs, lib. IM, lib. HI, cap. 1. (8) question may be seen in a very learned and interesting note commu- nicated by count Bartolomeo Borghese, in the Appendix, n. 1. Of the motives which guided the Confederates in the imitation of Roman types, one was obviously to signify, that the sovereignty of Italy was transferred from Rome to the Italians themselves. Among the types selected, there are some however which it is difficult to account for, and which have not been satisfactorily explained, such as the imitations from the Servilian family (20). The most probable opinion is, that these last were intended to allude, tauntingly and satirically, to .the defeat and death of two of the Servilii during the Social war: one killed at Asculum, as above stated, at the commencement of hostilities; the other, the proconsul Czpio, killed in an action with Pompedius. This opinion is corroborated by the present imitation from the Porcian family, which alludes to the defeat and death of the consul L. Porcius Cato, who fell in an enga- gement with the Marsi. The head of Rome victorious, and crowned with laurel, is here made to represent Italy; while the winged figure on the reverse, which referred originally to the dedication of the temple of Victoria Virgo (21), by M. Porcius Cato, A. U. C. 561, signifies that the goddess has now deserted Rome and the Porcii, and is become the tutelary divinity of Italy. A rare denarius (22) representing the bull, emblem of Italy, overpower- ing and trampling on the wolf of Rome, confirms the allegorical si- gnification attributed to the coms under consideration. (20) Averzrxo, Opuscoli Diversi, Napoli, 1833, (22) Durens, Explications de quelques Médailles, tom. II, pag. 18. page 22. Instead of a wolf, the author supposed (21) Ecxuzxz, loc. cit. the vanquished animal to be a crocodile. — SSS (9) CAPUA tn CAMPANIA. Female bust with an. elevated diadem (cgevddv_) and a sceptre resting on her shoulder. Rev. IFIN. In Osean letters. A winged thunderbolt. In the field, an-unknown object. AE. 3. Plate f/I, n. 3. The portrait on this coin is that of Juno, who is distinguished by the sceptre, emblem of sovereign power. The thunderbolt seen on the reverse is a farther characteristic of the goddess, as the spouse and sister of Jupiter, sole master of this irresistible weapon. A similar portrait, which is united with that of Jupiter on a rare medallion of this city (1), leaves no doubt on the subject. The same portrait appears also on another Capuan coin, with a sin- gular reverse (2), of which, owing to the minuteness of the objects repre- sented, and probably the imperfect preservation of the original, various explanations have been given. Some antiquaries deseribe it as repre- senting two symbols of pyramidal form; surmounted by a fillet (3); some, as two tents (4); others, as two female figures veiled (5). The exa- mination of a coin in perfect preservation proves that the last opinion is correct, and probably the type was intended to represent two statues of Juno, of archaic style, like that venerated at Samos. Numerous iniitations of this celebrated statue were seen throughout Asia Minor, and copies may have been brought to Capua, and placed in the temple of the goddess, after the conquest of Asia Minor, when many divinities of that country were introduced into Italy. The association of this type with the head of Juno affords additional presumption in favour of the opinion proposed. With respect to the union of two statues perfectly (1) Danrere, Numismatica Capuana, Napoli, 1803, pag. 17, 7. Mronner, Descript. de Méd. Grecques, pag. 43. tom. I, pag. 113. (2) Inem, pag. 26. ° (4) Comsz, Catalog. Num. Vet. in Mus. G. Hunter, (3) Ecxuztx describes them : Duce pyramides sin- pag. 80. 2n8s_ basibus insistentes. Catalog. Mus. Cxsar. Pars I, (6) Daniziza, Num. Cap. 1, pag. 26. 2 " P os pin ai ( 10 ) similar, it may be observed that an example of the same kind occurs on a coin of Aspendus, in Pamphylia (6), on whieh two statues of Diana are figured. CUMA iw CAMPANIA: Female head bound with a tenia or fillet. Rey. KYMAION. Cerberus with three heads, standing on a bivalve shell. AR. 2. Plate J, n. 4. (Mr Burgon, London.) From the very imperfect state of geographical knowledge in the Homeric age, it is difficult to ascertain whether the description of the Necyomanteia given by the poet, referred originally to Cuma in the Jand of the Opici, as was generally believed at a later period (1). It seems however more probable that the notions of Homer on the subject were indistinct, but that the first Chalcidic colonists, who settled in this part of Italy, were induced, by some resemblance in the | features of the country to those of the localities described by Homer, or by some other fortuitous motives, to accommodate to their newly ac- quired territory a legend which flattered their vanity, and conferred on them so much celebrity. Hence this district of Campania’was sup- posed to have been once inhabited by the Cimmerians, and the names of Aornos, Acherusia, Pyrophlegethon, Styx, and others described by Homer, were attributed to various localities in the neighbourhood of Cuma. The representation of Cerberus on the silver didrachm, here engraved for the first time, records therefore a legend of which the Cumzans were extremely glorious. It may be remarked, on this occasion, that there was perhaps at . Cuma some peculiar tradition respecting Cerberus, because, in the XIth book of the Odyssey, which describés the descent of Ulysses into the (6) Méd. Greeques Inéd., par J. Millingen, pag.68. (1) Srnazo, lib. I, pag. 20, 21, Edit. Cas. (11) Infernal regions, the scholiast says, that in the fourteenth line, Aristar- chus and Crates substituted Kepéepisv for the usual reading Kwueotev, the name of the inhabitants of that district. As the reasons for this cor- rection are unknown to us, nothing farther can be said on the subject. The bivalve shell over which Cerberus is placed, is that which is constantly represented on the coins of Cuma, either as the principal type, or an accessory, and which may be considered as the special emblem (Exionyov) of the Cumezans. The female head on the obverse is probably a personification of the city of Cuma. This opinion is confirmed by other coins of the city, which present a similar head, with the inscription KYME. Some antiquarians have supposed that these heads should be referred to the Sibyl; but, at the time when the coins were struck, the Sibyls were little known (2). For a great length of time, the coins of this illustrious city, the most ancient Greek colony in Italy, presented on the reverse no other type than the bivalve shell above mentioned, with the addition of a barley-corn, an acrostolium, or some other accessory of little impor- tance. But, within the last few years, other types of much greater interest have come to light. A short notice is subjoined of the most important, which give occasion to various observations. I. KYMAION. Head of Minerva; archaic style. Rev. A crab holding in its claws a bivalve shell. AR. 2. In a former numismatic work (3), in which this coin appeared for the first time, it was supposed that the crustacean on the reverse was the pinnophylax, or pinnothera, a species of crab, so called from its inhabiting with the pinna, and associating with it in quest of food, according to the description given by Pliny, A‘lian, and Athenzus. The authority of Aristotle ought also to have been cited (4), as he was the first who made the observation. (2) Ecxur.r was inclined to attribute the head (3) Mizxrwern. Médailles Grecques Inédites , . in question to the Siren Parthenope. Doct. Num. Rome, 1812, pag. 4. Vet. tom. I, pag. 113, (4) De Animalibus, lib. V, cap. 13. oe Lae Sree : | | | RT ~ (12 ) Subsequent consideration has shown, however, that the explanation in question was subject to great objections : 1° the crab called pinnophylax, or pinnothera, usually inhabited the interior of the shell of the animal with which it associated on friendly terms, in quest of prey, 2° the bivalve represented on the coin in question has not the form of the pinna, which is narrower and elongated, and, in fact, almost all the an- tiquarians who have described it, call it the Mytilus. From the ap- parent asperity of its surface, and its recurved form, it seems rather, as formerly stated, to be an oyster, probably of the species found in the Lucrine lake, so famous in antiquity, especially among the Romans in the Augustan age. A passage of the Halieutica of Oppian accordingly affords an expla- nation far more satisfactory of the entire type. Speaking of the mar- vellous instinct with which Providence has endowed the inhabitants of the Ocean, this author describes the stratagem of the crab, who, watching the instant when the oyster opens its shell, slips a stone between the valves, and thus the animal, being prevented from closing them, becomes an easy prey. Kal 7 yap exuppoadvinv nope datuey “Oorpex ép6eo0ar, yhoxephy xal duoydov udAy. “Osteen udv xdnidac dvanrbeaven Oupécpwy, "Toy duyp.ciCoucn, xal USatos toyavdwvre, Tléntatat, dyxolvnow goxueve metpatnor Kapxtvos ad Ungida rapk bnypivos detous, Azyptos Bbelxov oeper yaryor peapTag . AdOon & éumedder, uécow 8 évebyxato Mxav *Ooredu* EvOev Ereira Taoywevos etharuvelCer Aciica ofhyy: 2b 8’ do’ ott, xa idnevdy mep Epeioar ‘Ap.ordduoug mhdaruyyas éxer cOZvoc, GAN’ x’ dveeyxng Otyerar, dopa Ody te, xl dypeuriion xopeaor. Lib. IL, v. 169-180 (5). (5) Cancri mirabitur solertiam quicumque conspexe- a littore calculum in concharum hiatun ingicit; quo rit qua machinatione in muscosis cavernis ostrea ca- interposito, ostreum testas claudere non potest, atque plat. Ostreum cum suas conchas ceni et aque desi- a cancro exeditur et conficitur. Edit. Schneider. Ar - derio ad saxa patefacit, is suis brachiis sublatum gent. 1776. — q s spa cg tI mn ET aaa SS (13 ) The action represented on the coin corresponds perfectly with the description given by the poet, and, at the same time, confirms the opinion that the bivalve seen on Cumzan coins is in fact the oyster. 2. Female head, probably of the city. Rev. KYMAION. Marine divinity, the upper part human, the lower part terminating in a fish; underneath, a bivalve shell. AR. 2. In the numismatic publication above mentioned (6), the figure on the reverse was supposed to be AXgeon, or Briareus, who received divine honours in the island of Euboea, whence the Cumeans derived their origin. Comparing this type with other ancient monuments, it appears however more probable, that it represents Glaucus or Triton, marine divinities held in high veneration by the Greek colonies in Italy, who received them from the Phenicians and Carthaginians. ‘The first is represented on the coins of Heraclea, and on various works of art. The latter, who appears also in Tyrrhenian monuments, was so greatly ho- noured by the Carthaginians, that in a treaty with Philip of Macedon, they invoked Triton in common with Neptune and Mars (7). Rev. KYMAION. Scylla, in her usual form; underneath, a bivalve shell. AR. 2. This coin recalls the ancient Homeric traditions, and, at the same time, the veneration of the Cumeans for the divinities of the sea. It is also of great importance by the light it affords with regard to the coins inscribed AAAIBANON, which are to be referred to a town of that name, in the neighbourhood of Cuma (8). 4. Front head of a lion between two opposite heads of wild boars. Rev.. KYMAION. Bivalve shell and barley-corn. AR . 2. The obverse is not easily explained (9), but the pretensions of the in- habitants of Cuma to the possession of the tusks of the Erymanthian (6) Médailles Grecques Inédites, pag. 5. J. Mixurineen, pag. 7.—Avetz1no, Opuscoli Diversi, (7) Poxysrus, lib. VII, cap. 9. Napoli, vol. I, 1833, pag. 60. (8) Ancient Coins of Greek Cities and Kings, by (9) Ancient Greek Coins, pag. 5. — Avesxino, Supplem. Ital. Vet. Num., pag. 12, 13. (14 ) boar, preserved as relics in the temple of Apollo (10), appears to have some connexion with the type of this coin. 5. KYME. Female head, archaic style. ; ! Rev. KYMAION ( Retrograde ). Bivalve shell and barley-corn. AR. 2. The inscription accompanying the female head designates the Nymph or personification of the city, and thus confirms what has been said above, with regard to the female portraits usually seen on the Cu- mean coins. The observatién that the coins of Cuma never present the double letters H and Q, induced me to think that they must have been struck previously to the year 418 A. C., when Cuma was taken by the Cam- panians (11). The inference is howéver too absolute and liable to objections, inas- much as the beauty of the workmanship of some of the coins makes it doubtful whether they can be referred to an epoch so remote. Nor is there sufficient reason to suppose that the coinage necessarily ceased when. the city became subject to the Campanians, for, however barba- rous these invaders may originally have been, it is certain that they sub- sequently acquired civilization from those they conquered, and adopted the Greek language and arts. This is evident from the coins in- scribed KAMPANON, which were perhaps struck at Neapolis, or at Cuma (12); and likewise from those of the same people, who occupied Entella and Nacona (13), in Sicily. Nevertheless, the coins of Cuma do not seem of a later age than the hundredth Olympiad (377 A. C.), when some great calamity or political revolution, unnoticed by historians, probably occasioned the cessation of the coinage, which it would be difficult to account for otherwise, since we have proofs that the mints of the neighbouring cities Neapolis and Nola, continued to work till a very late period. (10) Pavsanras, lib, VIII, cap. 46. (12) Avzrrr1no, Opuscoli Diversi, vol. II, pag. 167, (11) Médailles Grecques Inédites, pag. 6. (13) Ancient Greek Coins, pag. 33. . (15 ) NATIOLUM iw APULIA. 1. Helmeted head of Minerva; above two globules, indicating the Sex- tans or nu Uncie. Rev. Monogram. Lion seated, holding with his fore-paw uplifted a spear. AE. 3. Plate IJ, n. 5. 2. Obverse, the same as the preceding. Rev. Same monogram. Hercules in the attitude of the Farnesian colossus. AL. Plate III, n. 6. The workmanship, the types, and the globules indicative of the value with reference to the as, prove evidently that these coins belong to Italy, and, in particular, to Apulia. The letters of which the monogram is composed are likewise favour- able to this attribution. It is uncertain whether it should be resolved into NAT or MAT; but it applies in either case to Apulia, where we find Natiolum, supposed to be Bisceglie, a city on the Via Frentana, nineteen miles from Barium (1), Matinum, on mount Garganus (2), and Mateolum, supposed to have been where Matera now stands. The most probable opinion seems, however, in favour of Natiolum (3); Brass coins occur with the same types as n° 1, but with the mono- gram VE, which is found also on other coins with various types. These last coins were once attributed to Velia in Lucania; but of late the improbability of the attribution has been felt, and they have been refer- red to Venusia in Apulia (4), an opinion confirmed by their resemblance to the coins of Luceria, a city not far distant from Venusia. The coins however with the monogram VE, and types like those of the present, are of a different fabric, and may possibly belong rather to Veretum, a city of the Salentines in Iapygia, on account of their resem- blance to the coins of Uxentum, a town fifteen miles distant from Veretum. (1) Cramer, Ancient Italy, tom. II, pag. 332. Capua, appears to be perfectly similar to n. i (2) Ipem, pag. 277. described above. (3) A coin in Dr. Hunter's collection, published (4) Mronnzr, Suppl., tom. I, pag. 270.— Szsrimr, by Combe (tab. XIV, n. 18), and attributed to Class. Gen., pag. 15. ( 16 ) POSIDONIA iw LUCANIA. Neptune brandishing his trident in a menacing attitude. On one side, POME!; on the other, MEILA in archaic characters, from right to left. Rev. POMEI!. Ox walking. AR. Plate J, n. 7 (M. Prosper Dupré, Paris. ) With the usual types and legend of the coins of Posidonia, this silver didrachm is remarkable by the additional inscription MEILA. It would seem, at first, that this addition to the usual legend referred to the name of the Silarus, a neighbouring river, which flowed into the sea, fifty stadia to the north of Posidonia, and formed the boundary between Lucania and Campania (1); and, in fact, this opinion would have been very probable, had the word in question been on the side representing the ox or bull ( frequently figured as the emblem of a river ); but its being placed near the figure of Neptune is an objection to a similar explanation. Perhaps then it may designate the name of a magistrate, Silarus, or Silarius, consistently with the common custom of giving to individuals names derived from the localities of their na- tive countries. Thus we find Scamandrius and Simoisius in Homer, and there are many other examples of the same kind. : j It may also be conjectured, and not without probability, that the coin under consideration was intended to commemorate an alliance between Posidonia and a neighbouring city situated on the Silarus, and which took its name from that river, as was frequently the case. ; Or the city in question might have been that called Salernum by the Romans, who established there a colony, in 559 A. U.C. (2). Probably, however, the origin of that city was much more ancient, and of Greek (1) Srrazo, lib. V, pag. 251. (2) Tir. Liv., lib, XXXIV, cap, 42. (a) foundation (3); in which case the name would have been terminated in ta instead of ernum, which was a form peculiar to the Oscans and Romans (4). Supposing its ancient appellation to have been Silaria, the change into Saleria (and Salernum ) will create no difficulty, when we consider the great alteration of geographical names effected by the Ro- mans. This opinion, respecting the object of the inscription, is corroborated in some measure by other coins of Posidonia, which offer the name of the city, accompanied with the letters M44] (5), supposed, with reason, to,refer to Phistelia or Picentia, and to imply an alliance between one of those cities and the Posidoniate. It is true that geographers make no mention of a city called Silarus; but we know that many Hellenic and Tyrrhenian colonies were estab- lished in Campania and in a part of Lucania, the names of which have not reached us. In fact, Hyria, Allibanum, Phistelia and several other towns in Campania (6), unnoticed by history, are known only by coins, and their situation can be ascertained by conjectures alone. New discoveries of coins or other monuments may perhaps throw light on the subject, and enable us to decide between the explanations suggested. An opportunity here occurs of examining a story given by Athenzeus on (3) Geographers are inclined to think that the primitive city did not occupy the same site as the Roman Salernum, but was at some distance, and farther from the sea. The hill which rises above the modern Salerno was selected by the Romans for an encampment on account of its commanding situation, and was intended to keep in check the Picentes and Lucanians. Here a permanent gar- rison was kept, and, from its vicinity to the city, it was called Castram Salerni. Afterwards a colony was established there, and it grew into a city, which became extremely prosperous, and was called Salernum. Probably the population of the old city was transferred to the new. V.Cruysnivs, Ital. Antig. (4) Gentile names (+% é6vixe) terminating in erni are frequent in Latium and Campania, and are generally formed from names of towns ending in ia. Thus we find Fabraterni from Fabrateria, Cu- pelterni from Cupelteria, Venserni from Veseris, Veliterni from Velitra, etc. Falernum, Liternum, and others, are formed in the same manner. (5) Mronner, Méd. Grecq., Suppl., tom. I, pag. 306, n. 718-721. (6) The inscription on the tomb of Scipio Bar- batus records the names of various cities of Sam- nium and Lucania, which are not noticed in his- tory. V. Visconrr, Monum. degli Scipioni. Piranesi, Roma, 1783, in-f*. SE cea ee ( 18 ) the authority of Aristoxenus,a philosopher and musician of Tarentum, respecting a custom subsisting in his time at Posidonia. « The inhabitants of that city, » he says (7), « originally Hellenes, had gradually fallen into barbarism, and, becoming Tyrrhenians or Romans, had changed the ancient language and usages of their ancestors. Sensible however of their misfortunes, they still continued to celebrate one of their ancient sacred festivals; and on a stated day, in each year, assembled together to revive the recollection of their ancient Hellenic language and in- stitutions; and, after having deplored in common, and wept over their fatal destiny, they returned in sadness to their respective homes. » The first, among many objections to this story, is the improbability that a festival of this kind should have been observed by the Roman colonists, who possessed the city by right of conquest, and whose forefathers had deprived the original Greek inhabitants of a large part of their lands and property. The custom in question could therefore have subsisted only among the descendants of the ancient inhabitants reduced to a state of in- feriority, and excluded from many of the political or civil rights enjoyed by the Roman colonists. And such may have been the case, but, ata time, and under circumstances very different from those relat- ed by Athenzeus. Setting aside, however, other objections on the score of improbability, more positive arguments against the authority of the story arise from its direct opposition to all historical and chronological evi- dence, as a slight examination suffices to show. The date of the occupation of Posidonia by the Lucanians is the first point to be considered, and though it cannot be determined with precision, it may, with great probability, be placed at a short period after the expedition of Alexander, king of Epirus (8). This prince came to Italy in 417 A. U. C. (337 A. C.); in order to protect the Hellenic cities of the coast against the incursions of the Lucanians an (7) Lib. XIV, pag. 632. (8) Trr. Lrv., lib. VIII, cap. 3. (19 ) other barbarians of the interior, who had already gained possession of several maritime cities. In the course of the war he went by sea to the relief. of Posidonia, besieged by the Lucanians and Samnites. 3 A battle took place in the neighbourhood of the city (9), and Alexander obtained a complete victory, 425, A. U. C. Thus Posidonia was saved; but, after the death of Alexander, 431 A. U. C., the barbarians regained the ascendant, and took possession of the city. The Tuca- nians remained masters of it, till they were subdued in their turn by the Romans, who, soon after their conquest, sent a colony to Posidonia (10), in 480 A. U. C, The occupation of the city by the Lucanians cannot therefore have exceeded fifty or sixty years; and, in such a limited space of time, it * can hardly be supposed that any material change. of manners could oy have been effected. Besides we:know that, far from imposing their gt language and customs on the Greek population subject to their power, at the Lucanians, on the contrary, acquired those of the vanquished people. As an instance of this, we find that a Lucanian ambassador sent to Syracuse, harangued in the Greek tongue, and filled the popular ,, assembly with astonishment at his pure Doric (11). The coins struck. « by the Lucanians, are likewise incontestable proofs of the use of tlfe* Greek language and arts by that people (12). No alteration in these respects could therefore have taken place be- fore the establishment of the Roman Colony, as before stated, in 480 * : . ce A. U. G. (274 A. G.). But, as in all similar cases, the change must. (9) « Ceterum Samnites bellum Alexandri Epirensis Posidonia did not become subject to the Lit ‘anians in Lucanos traxit: « Qui duo populi adyersus regem, till after the King’s death.#. 3 exscensionem a Pesto facientem, signis conlatis (10) Tir. Lry., Epit. , lib. XIV. pugnayerunt, eo certamine superior Alexander ». (11) Dro. Curysosrom., Orat. Corinth., tom. II, Tir. Liy., lib. VIII, cap. 17. pag. 113. Edit. Reiske. : eo From this passage, though somewhat obscure, it (12) Ecxuxxr, Doct. Num. Vet., tom. I, pag. 150. may be inferred that Alexander, who had been car- Some of the coins are inscribed AYKIANON, and rying on war for several years in various parts of those apparently of a later date, AOYKANOM, but Magna Grecia, came by sea to Posidonia, probably always in Greek characters, and all were certainly besieged by the barbarians, Hence it is evident that struck before the year 480 U. C. 33 ( 20 ) have been gradual and slow, the number of the first colonists being small, comparatively with that of the ancient inhabitants; and we see, by the coins of Posidonia (13), that the change of manners was not im- mediate, but gradual and progressive. The great and insuperable argument, however, against the authen- ticity of the story in question is deduced from the consideration of the period in which Aristoxenus lived. The time of his birth is un- certain ; but we know that he was a disciple of Aristotle, who died in 426 A. U. C.; and’ from various ancient testimonies, Mr. Clinton (14) fixes the epoch when he flourished, between 320 and 287 A.C. (434 and 467 A.U.C.) : and consequently, he could not possibly have described the Posidoniate as converted into Romans, since it was not ull 481 A.U. C., that is to say, thirteen years after his death, that Posidonia became subject to the Romans, and received a Roman colony. It is evident then, that Athenzus must have been mistaken with regard to the author of the statement in question, or, if he were correct as to w_the name, that the Aristoxenus, to whom he refers it, was not the dis- * ciple of Aristotle, but another author of the same name, who lived at “a much later period, probably about the end of the Roman Republic. The great change described in the condition of the Greek population in the south of Italy, was not entirely effected, till after the Social * War, when military colonies were distributed throughout Italy, first by Sylla, and afterwards by the two Triumvirates; the lands of many mu- nicipal cities were then confiscated, and divided among the officers and soldiers of the disbanded legions, and the ruin of the ancient population finally consummated. (13) The earliest coins, after the colonisation by Grecques, pl. I, n. 15.—Mronnrr. Descrip. de Méd, the Romans, are inscribed MAISTANO, and are of Suppl. , tom. I, pag. 308 . very good workmanship. V. Recueil de Médailles (14) Fasti Hellenici, part. III, pag. 473. a Sn 5 AEE (ee) HIPPONIUM iw BRUTTIIS. CEI. Youthful male head, covered with the petasus. Rev. A caduceus. AE. 3. Plate I/II, n. 8. Pellerin (1), who first published coins similar to the present, ascribed them to Siris in Lucania, and his opinion has been since generally followed by antiquaries. Strong objections, however, appear to this attribution. 1° The city of Siris was first destroyed about the year 510 A. C., and, though afterwards restored, never recovered its former prosperity, and finally:ceased to exist when Heraclea was built (2), either on the same site, or very near it, in 428 A.C., an epoch certainly much anterior to the time when the coins under consideration were struck. 2° The first letter E, taken by Pellerin for a sigma, never had that: form in Magna Grecia, or Sicily, except perhaps late in the Imperial ages. Its real value is that of the digamma which repeatedly “occurs habe this form in the celebrated tables of Heraclea (3) and on other ancient, monuments. The letters El, preceded by the digamma, may rather -be consi- | dered as the initials of the city of Hipponium, or-rather Heiponium, as it was called by the inhabitants, who invariably. are styled Eirdévec on their coins. Though called Hipponium by ancient authors, its: name probably was also Hippon; or Eeipon, with the digamma instead of ‘the rough aspirate. In fact, this form was retained unchanged by the Romans in the appellation of Vibo, to which they added: the epithet of Valentia, when they established there a eglony, in 560 A. U.G. (6). The opinion of Pellerin was chiefly owing to two sa one in- (1). Supplément III, pag. 38. (4) The identity of the Greek name Edy with (2) Drovor. Srcux., lib. XII, cap. 36.—Srrano, the Latin Vibo has been noticed by the editors of lib. V, pag. 279. the French Strabo, lib. V. (3) Mazzocnr., Tabul. Heracl., pag. 128. % (22 ) scribed EEIPIZ, the other ZEIRI, which he supposed to be the name of the city; but Eckhell has shown (5) that the first is undoubtedly of Coreyra, and that the second appears to be of Laos in Lucania, both with names of magistrates. . ; It may be here observed that in a passage of Livy, where the ope- rations of Alexander, king of Epirus, are described (6), the name of Hipponium ought probably to be substituted instead of that of Si- pontum. The author says : « Caterum quum ( Alexander ) sepe Brut- « tias Lucanasque legiones fudisset; Heracleam Tarentinorum coloniam, « Consentiam ex Lucanis, Sipontumque, Bruttiorum Terinam, alias inde « Messapiorum ac Lucanorum cepisset urbes, ete. » The editors of Livy have perceived that the passage was corrupt, and instead of Sipontum, a city, not of Lucania, but of Apulia, and far distant from the scene of action described, they have proposed to read Metapontum; a correction highly exceptionable, and which would remove the difficulty in part only, since Consentia, no more than Sipon- tum, could have been described in Lucania ( ex Lucanis ), as it was the well known capital of the Bruttii, and is in fact so called by Livy him- self, in a subsequent book (7). Hence, it is evident that some transpo- sition, or perhaps interpolation, has taken place, and that the pas- sage may probably be restored thus : « Heracleam, Tarentinorum co- loniam, ex Lucanis, Consentiam Hipponiumque (8) Bruttiorum, Teri- namque (9), alias inde Messapiorum et Lucanorum cepisset urbes, ete. (8) Doct. Num. Vet., tom. I, pag. 160. (9) The first Hellenic cities in the Western coas (6) Lib. VIII, cap. 24. taken by the Bruttii were Terina and Hipponium, (7) Lib. XXX, cap. 19. Olymp. 106, 1. Dronor. Srcut., lib. XVI, cap. 15. (8) So easy is the mistaking of Sipontum for In all the editions of this author the reading is Hipponium, that Pellerin, who first published coins Apmdywv, instead of which Wesseling: has very judi- of the latter, ascribed them to the former. Sup* ciously proposed frmdviev, which is, in fact, implied plém. III, pag. 7. F by the vicinity of that city to Terina. (93°) LEONTINI 1 SICILIA. AEONTINON. Helmeted head of Minerva. Behind, a grain of corn. Rev. Pegasus, AR. 2. Plate III, n. 9. (Mr. Stuart, at Naples ). This city having been founded by a colony of Chaleidians from . Eubeea (1), it appears extraordinary to see on its coins emblems which _ belong exclusively to Corinth and its colonies, and are totally different from those characteristic of the Leontini, and usually represented on their coins (2). The apparent anomaly is accounted for by the political changes which this city experienced. ° . The violent and deep-rooted. rivalship and animosity which subsisted from the earliest times between the Dorian and Chalcidian colonies established in Sicily, produced frequent hostilities between-them. Their forces, however, were nearly balanced; and, for a long time, no decisive or important result ensued. But, after the prosperous reigns of Gelo and Hiero, the Syracusans acquired a decided ascendency, and their ambition encreasing with their power, they aspired to the subjection of the other free cities of the island, particularly those of the Chalcidians. Unable to contend with such a formidable power, to whose attacks they were, from their vicinity, the first exposed, the Leontini had re- course to the Athenians, and sent an embassy, of which the celebrated orator Gorgias had the direction (3). Not only their common origin as Ionians, but ambitious views, and the desire of acquiring possession of such an important island, in- duced the Athenians to grant the request of the Leontini, and to send a fleet and army to their assistance (4). (1) Tuucynroas, lib. VI, cap. 3. to the name of the city. V. Torremuzza. (2) The obverse presents the portrait of Apollo, (3) Dropor. Srcux., lib. XII, cap. 54. Aeynyérng; reverse, a lion’s head, emblem allusive (4) Tuvcynrpzs, lib. IT, cap. 86. ( 24) The arrival of these succours arrested the progress of the Syracusans; but, not being sufficiently powerful to decide the contest, hostilities con- tinued during three summers with various success, but no decided ad- vantage. At length, the rival states, tired with the contest, convened a congress at Gela, where, by the persuasion of Hermocrates, a treaty of peace was concluded ( Olymp. 88, 4) on condition that each party should retain what it possessed (5). Not long after this pacification, and the departure of the Athenians, the Leontini, in order to fill up the void in the population, occasioned by the war, admitted a number of aliens, or those of a lower caste, to the franchise of the city. This gave occasion to the people to demand a new division of lands. The nobles, who, by this measure, were de- prived of a great part of their property, had recourse to the Syracusans, and, by their assistance, expelled the popular party. Finding, however, the city depopulated, and themselves too weak to defend it, they re- moved to Syracuse, where they were admitted as citizens, with the full enjoyment of all political rights (6). From the account of the transaction given by Diodorus (7), it appears that the deserted city of Leontini was converted into a fortress of the Syracusans, and received a Syracusan garrison. Our information respecting Sicilian affairs being very imperfect, as they are only noticed incidentally, when connected with those of” Greece; we know litile of the subsequent occurrences. It appears, however, that a portion of the Leontini took possession of several strong holds in the country, where they held out for a long time; but that the city itself remained in the power of the Syracusans, till the treaty of peace between Dionysius and the Carthaginians was concluded (Olymp. 93, 4), when the Leontini were restored to liberty and reinstated in their city (8)- (5) Taucypines, lib. IV, cap. 58, 65. Lvpanovaror rots Aecvrivers meradevees Tsing, amar (6) Tuucyprrs, lib, V, cap. 4. According to tas Supaxoucisus excincay, KOL Thy 7 dorcy daederev Diodorus, it would seem that the remoyal of the tay Zuzaxousiwv,. Lib. XII, cap. 54. Leontini to Syracuse was a condition of the treaty (7) Loc. cit. for, after relating its conclusion, he says : Oi de (8) Dropor. Srcux., lib. XIH, cap. 114. ( 25 ) The repose of Leontini was of short duration, In the following year (Olymp. 94, 2), Dionysius made himself master of the city, and removed the inhabitants to Syracuse (1). From this period, the Leon- tini_ were reduced to subjection, and involved in all the foreign wars and domestic factions of the Syracusans, but, as Strabo observes (2), participating solely in the adverse fortune, never in the prosperity of their oppressors, The power of Dionysius being consolidated, he meditated the project of expelling the Carthaginians out of Sicily. A war ensued, of which the fatal effects extended to the whole island, and with this evil dreadful pestilence was combined (3). The peace which was concluded, (Olymp. 95,2), brought no melio- ration in the condition of the unfortunate Leontini. A sedition having arisen among the mercenaries of Dionysius, who claimed their pay and the rewards promised to them, Dionysius, unable or unwilling to satisfy their demands, and wishing to get rid of such dangerous auxiliaries, offered to them, in lieu. of money, the possession of the city and terri- tory of Leontini (4). This proposal was gladly accepted, on account of the great fertility of the soil, and ten thousand mercenaries, chiefly Peloponnesians, divided by lot the Leontine territory, of which, in all probability, frequent wars, internal factions, and pestilence, had greatly reduced, if not annihilated, the population. No mention of the Leontini occurs in history during the remaining part of the reign of Dionysius, or the first years of that of his son. But, on the arrival of Dion in Sicily, those who occupied the city revolted against Dionysius, and repulsed an attack of Philistus, the lieutenant of Dionysius, who was sent against them. Afterwards, when Dion was obliged to retire from Syracuse, on account of the intrigues of Heraclides, he repaired to Leontini, where he was received with the greatest honours, and civic rights were given to the foreign soldiers of (4) Dropor. Srcux. , lib. XIV, cap. 15. (3) Diopor. Srcvx., lib. XIV, cap. 70. (2) Lib. VI, pag. 273. : (4) Dropor. Srevx., lib. XIV, cap. 78. 4 ( 26 ) his army (5). Here Dion established his head quarters, till circum- stances enabled him to return to Syracuse. When hostilities had ceased, and tranquillity was restored, Dion, wishing to establish a new and better form of government, applied to Corinth for men, qualified for counsellors and administrators of the new system framed on the Lacedemonian and Dorian model (6). It appears highly probable, from this statement, that the coins of Leon- tini, which, like the present, bear Corinthian emblems, are of the time of Dion, (Olymp. 106). Not only was the constitution of the Syracusan state then organised on the Corinthian model, but a number of the Corinthian soldiers of the army of Dion became citizens of Leontini, probably to fill up the void in the population, and of course were admitted to a share of the lands, and to the enjoyment of all political rights. This new po- pulation, proud of their origin, would naturally be anxious to adopt the emblems, and imitate the coinage of their native country. Thus we find so many Syracusan coins with Corinthian types, struck at different periods, perhaps some, like the present, under the administration of Dion; others, at a later period, under Timoleon. In the time of the latter, Sicily was so depopulated by frequent wars, contagious diseases and intestine divisions, that he was obliged to write to Corinth, requesting that colonists might be sent from Greece (7). It may excite surprise that only one coin of this description has come to light; but this circumstance may be explained by the troubles which followed the death of Dion, the occupation of Leontini by Icetas, and another removal of its inhabitants to Syracuse by Timoleon. After so many political convulsions, and its complete subjection to Syracuse, it appears that Leontini never recovered its prosperity; and, in fact, none of the silver coins of this city are of a later age than that of Dion ( Olymp. 106, 4). Those in copper are of a much mofe recent period, and after the Roman conquest. (5) Prurancu, in Dio., c. 40. Diop. Sicuz., XVI, 16. (7) Dropor. Srcun., lib. XVI, cap. 82. — Pxu- (6) Pxurancu, in Dione, cap. 53. rarcu, in Timol., cap. 22. ( 27.) LONGANE 1 SICILIA. AOFrANAION, from right to left. Juvenile head of Hercules. Rev. Youthful head of uncertain character. AR 3. Plate II, n. 10 (M. Prosper Dupré ). A brass coin, with the initials Aor, was published by Pellerin (1), who’ ascribed it to Longone in Sicily, an attribution which, though called in doubt by Eckhell (2), acquires confirmation from the present silver obolus, with the entire legend AOTTANAION. The name of this city is recorded by Stephanus of Byzantium, on the authority. of Philistus ; he calls it Longone (3), but. without saying in what part of the island it was situated. From Diodorus Siculus (4), however, we learn that it was a fortress in the territory of Catana. A river Longanus is likewise mentioned by Polybius. (5). and. Dio- dorus (6), which, from its name, might be supposed to have been. near the city; but, from the account of Polybius, who speaks of it as being in the Mylzan plain, modern geographers (7) have placed it between Mylee and Tyndaris, on the Northern side of the island. The name of this city, though apparently barbarous, may be of Hellenic origin, since a borough in Boeotia was. called Acyyxc, where Mi- nerva had a temple (8), whence the epithet of Acyyés¢ was given to her. The present coin and one similar, in the collection of Baron Astuto, at Noto (9), are those hitherto known. The workmanship and design of them are rude; a circumstance which makes it probable that Lon- gane was situated in the interior of the island, where the arts were not in the same state of perfection as in the maritime cities. The “copper coins with Aor are also of the same rude style. (1) Peuples et villes, tom. TII, pag. 106. (6) Lib. XXII, Eclog. XV. (2) Doct. Num. Vet. , tom. I, pag. 218. (7) Cruvenres, Sicil. Antiq. , lib. IL, cap. v, p. 303. (3) V. Acyydvn. (8) Tzerzes ad Lycophrony vers.°520. (4) Lib. XXIV, Eclog. II. (9) Caxcaceni, di Finzia Re di Siracusa. Palermo, (5) Lib. I, cap. rx, 3. 1809, pag. 25. fi ( 28 ) MESSANA 1 SICILIA. MESSENION. A hare running. Rev. Male figure in a chariot drawn by one horse. AV. 3. Weight, 22 + grains. Plate IV, n. 11 (Marquis Pucci, Florence). We see here the first gold coin of Messana, which has hitherto come to light. It is a diobolus, or the third part of a drachm. The péeu- liar form of the letters, especially of the sigma, and the Ionic dialect of the legend MEXZENION, refer it to an early age, and previous to the ascendant acquired by the Doric portion of the motley population of this city (1), an ascendant which probably took place after the failure of the Athenian expedition against Syracuse. Notwithstanding the extensive commerce and great opulence of the Hellenic cities of Sicily, it appears that gold was very scarce in that island before the time of Philip of Macedone. It is well known what difficulty Hiero experienced in obtaining at Corinth a certain quantity of that metal for an offering to Jupiter, after a victory obtained either over an enemy, or at public games (9). In fact, no early gold coins of Sicily are found. The most ancient are those which present a female portrait, with a reticular head dress, and the name of KIMOQN, and representing on the reverse Hercules strangling the Nemaan lion. These are of the same work as the mag- nificent silver medallions so well known for their beauty, and are probably of the time of Dionysius (3). Besides Syracuse, the only cities which coined gold are Agrigentum, Gelas and Tauromenium, all of (1) See on the subject of the population of (3) Itmaybe noticed here that the small gold coins Messana a paper by the author, inserted in the of Syracuse, with a head of Hercules, and reverse, Transactions of the Royal Society of Literature, a female head in the centre of an indented square, vol. I, part. II, pag. 93. are imitations of silver coins of an early age; but (2) Arurwaxus, lib. V, pag. 282. no prototypes of them haye been found in gold. ( 29 ) Dorian origin; but their coins are not of a remote age, perhaps none previous to Alexander. The present is then the most. ancient Sicilian gold coin hitherto -known, and a monument which attests the early prosperity of the Messenians, previous to the fatal tyranny of the Dionysii. SEGESTA. in SICILIA. ZETEZTATIBEMI. from right to left. Female head of archaic style: Rev. A dog. AR. 2. Plate I, n. 12, (M. Prosper Dupré ). Like the greater number of the coins of this city, the present silver didrachm bears the inscription 3ETETXA, in archaic characters followed by the letters ZIB. Some antiquaries have su pposed that these additional letters were numerals, which implied an era in use at Segesta. Other explanations have been proposed, but all equally improbable, according to Eckhell, who with his usual sobriety of conjecture, characteristic of a genuine critic, abstained from offering an opinion on the subject (1). The addition EMI (for Ei) to the usual legend on the. present coin, hitherto unpublished (2), may be considered as affording a very probable solution of the point, by leading to the inference that the termination ZIB is an adverbial particle, like the paragogic f, a, ot and ev, and others of the same kind frequently added to substantives, chiefly those standing as genitives. The unusual termination B in the present instance, may be attributed to a peculiar dialect in use at Se- _ gesta, and perhaps derived from the Punic language. Many cities in this part of the island were, in fact, long subject to the Carthaginians, and issued numerous coins with Punic legends. It is indeed highly pro- bable that Segesta itself was originally a Phcenician colony. (1) Doct. Num. Vet. tom. I, pag. 234, fect state of preservation, the author read AME: (2) Acoin, without doubt similar, has been pub- instead of EMI. Torremuzza, ad Sicil. Num. lished; but, either by inadvertence, or the imper- Vet, Auctar. II, tab. V, ( 30 ) Consistently with this supposition, the legend would read,. accord- ing to the usual form, 2eyécras eu (Néycpe understood.) a mode of expression not uncommon on.monuments of art of an early age. The female head on the obverse, is that of Egesta who gave her name to the city. The learned Eckhell has given the following very satisfactory illustration of the type on the reverse (3): « When Nep- tune, to punish the perfidy of Laomedon, sent a marine monster, to which the most noble Trojan virgins were to be successively sacri- ficed, Hippotes, with a view to preserve his daughter Egesta, sent her away privately by sea. On her landing in Sicily, the river god of the Crimisus became enamoured of her, and, in order to surprise her, assumed the form of a dog. The result of this union was a son called, after his mother, Egestus, who, when of age, founded a city, to which he gave the name of his mother. Hence, according to va- rious ancient authors (4), several Sicilian cities represented a dog on their coins. » ABDERA tx THRACIA. Winged Griffin seated, lifting up one of his forefeet. Rev. EPIMOATATOPEQ. Female, figure with a short tunic and sin- cular head-dress, in.a dancing attitude—AR 1. Weight, 191 } grains. Plate If, n. 13 (Royal Collection, at Paris ). The coins of this city present invariably the figure of a griffin, which was also the symbol of the Teians of Ionia, who colonised Abdera, and resided there for a length of time, when they abandoned Teos, in order to avoid the Persian yoke (1). It has been generally supposed that this symbol was originally that of Teos, whence it was taken by Abdera; but Mr. C. O. Muller is of a different opinion (2), and thinks that it was first adopted by the Ab- (3) Doct. Num. Vet., loc. cit (1) Hrroporus, lib. I, cap. 168. (4) Tzzxzxs in Lycoph., v. 953.—Srnrvius ad En., (2) Hist. and Antig. of the Doric Race, vol. I, lib. V, 30. pag. 232. English Translation. ( 31 ) dui in allusion to the worship of Apollo, who had a celebrated temple at Dera, in the vicinity of Abdera, and that this symbol was afterwards taken by the Teians, in consequence of their residence at Abdera. The former opinion, however, appears preferable, for various reasons. It cannot be doubted that long before the flight of the Teians to Abdera, Apollo was the principal divinity of the Ionian confederacy, and that the Hyperborean legends were known in Asia Minor earlier than in Greeces* hence, a number of cities in AZolia, Ionia, and other provinces of Asiag pretended to have been founded by Amazons. Con- nected with these legends were the griffinsy who became the attributes of Apollo, considered also as an Hyperborean deity; nor are the griffins represented only on the coins of Teos, but on those of Phoca and Smyrna. To these considerations it may be added, that it was usual for colonies to imitate the institutions and rites of the metropolis; but the metropolis would never have condescended to borrow from its colonies, which were always considered in an inferior point of view. In addition to this the usual emblem of the Abderite, the present coin represents a female figure attired in a short tunic, with a singular head-dress, and in a dancing or pantomimic attitude. Similar figures, though now first seen on:coins, are frequent on ancient works of art, particularly in basrelief. Visconti supposed them to be Lacedzemonian virgins (3) assisting at rites in honour of Diana, at Ca- rye. Zoéga has explained them as hierodules (4), who were either captives, or purchased slaves, dedicated to the service of Venus. With regard to the ornaments of the head-dress of these figures, there are different opinions : by some they have been taken for palms, by others for twigs of willows, or for reeds (5), which appears to be the most pro- bable. In the present instance, the head-dress is not formed of detached (3) Musto Pro Crem., tom. III, pag. 49 (d). (5) See Granac. Musée royal, n. 533 , and Wex- (4) Bassi-rilievi di Roma, tom. I, pag. 111-118, cen, Annales de I’Inst. de Corr. Arch., tom. V, tay. 20, 21. pag. 151. ( 32 ) reeds, as is usually seen, but they are interwoven, and form a kind of basket or calathus, called cata, as it is described by Hesychius (6). The costume in which these figures appear, tends to confirm the opi- nion of Visconti, respecting their Lacedemonian origin. That they were called Caryatides from the circumstance of their functions at Carye, may be inferred from Plutarch (7), who relates that dancing Caryatides were represented as the emblems of the seal of Clearchus, general of the Greek troops in the service of Cyrus, and it is not improbable that they were similar to the figures under consideratign. But it should be observed that the peculiar costume and action of these figures are not characteristic of the Spartan women exclusively, being equally appropriate tos the Amazons; and hence, it must be difficult to distinguish one from the other on ancient works of art. From the far greater celebrity of the Amazons, however (8), it seems probable that they should have been more frequently repre- sented than the Caryatid virgins. There is.also a strong objection to the general appellation of hierodules given by many antiquaries, because, although the custom of wearing the short tunic prevailed at Sparta, it was not imitated in other Dorian states : nor can it be supposed that even at Corinth or Eryx, the females who officiated in the temples of Venus used a similar costume, much. less those who were addicted to the service of other divinities. From these motives, the figures under consideration seem rather intended to represent Amazons in the act of performing sacred rites, We know that the construction of the temple of Diana at Ephesus was attributed to these warlike females (g), and that they instituted religious ceremonies not only in honour of that goddess, but also of Mars, of Apollo, and of other divinities. Probably the hierodules of nyo or Bellona at Comana, and of Anaitis at Zela in Pontus, were in imitation of the Amazons. (6) See C. O. Murzer, Dorians, vol. U1, pag. 353. (8) Homen, Iliad, Fr, vers, 189, et Z, vers. 185. (7) In Artaxerxe, cap. 18. (9) Drovor. Srcux., lib. II, cap. 96. ( 33 ) So great, in fact, is the analogy, that some eminent critics are of opinion (10) that the idea of the Amazons was first suggested by the sight of the many female slaves (ispddouX0) which were em- ployed about the temples of Asia Minor. The converse of this seems however far more probable, because the mythos of the Amazons is of a very early period, and long before the establishment of temples so. richly endowed as to be able to entertain such a number of sacred ministers. A farther argument in favour of this Opinion, is the frequency of the representation of these figures on the breast-plates - of Imperial and other statues in a military costume, where it was certainly more appropriate to represent Amazons, the daughters of the god of war, rather than dancing women of servile condition. The representation of an Amazon on the present coin is therefore a type perfectly suited to Abdera, a colony of Teos in Ionia, a country where the Amazons were held in the highest veneration, and’ con- sidered as the founders of most of the cities which composed the lonian confederacy. She is here represented in the manner described by Callimachus (11), dancing before a newly raised statue of the divinity. In addition to this general motive, it may have a special reference to Molpagoras, archon or holding some other eponymous magistracy, in allusion to his name, Moir} implying particularly the song accompanied with the dance (12), which is here expressed. The legend, as is usual on the coins of Abdera, is in the Tonic dialect, EMI MOATIATOPEQ. The name of Molpagoras is also Tonian, and refers’ perhaps to a descendant of Molpagoras, father of the Arista- goras, who was author of the Ionian msurrection against Darius, and who, obliged to fly from Miletus, formed a settlement at Myrci- nus in Thrace (13), and was killed in an engagement with the Edones (Olymp. 70, 4, A. G. 4g7 ). (10) Muxxer, Dorians, vol. I, pag. 405. Efigl. Transl. (12) Damar, Lexicon. V. Mom. (11) Hymn. in Dian., vers. 237—243. (13) Hzrovorus, lib. V, cap. 126. (34) ANCHIALUS in THRACIA. AFXIAAOC. Youthful male head bound with a fillet. Rev. ATXIAAEON, sculapius leaning on his staff with serpents entwined round it. AE 3. Plate II, n. 14. When the origin of a Greek city was uncertain or unknown, the vanity of the inhabitants induced them frequently to call into being an imaginary hero, to whom the foundation and name of the city were’ attributed. Thus, although Anchialus evidently was so called from its vicinity to the sea, a hero of that name appears on the present coin (1) as its founder. No mention of Anchialus occurs before the time of Strabo (2), who described it as a small town (odiyvov ) subject to Apollonia. Afterwards, at the time of the Dacian wars, it became of importance, and was favoured by Trajan, who gave it the surname of Ulpia. Autonomous coins of Anchialus are very scarce, but those with Imperial portraits, from the reign of Antoninus Pius to that of Gor- dianus, are very numerous, and attest the prosperity of its mha- bitants. As on many similar cases, the portrait of the hero is, in fact, that of some personage to whom the city wished to offer a compliment. The reverse. shows the veneration paid to /Esculapius, who with Hygieia, is represented on various Imperial coins of Anchialus (3). (1) It is described by Mionnet (Supplem., t. II, Anchiale. pag. 216), from the collection of M. D’Hermand. (3) Mrowwer, Suppl., tom. Il, Anchialus, n. 113, (2) Lib. VII, pag. 319. This author calls it 118, 140, 141, 155. ( 35 ) GETAS REX EDONUM. 1. Male figure with the causia, holding two spears, and guiding a yoke of oxen. Rey. FETA BAZIAEQ2 HAQNAN, on the sides of an indented square, subdivided into four parts. AR. MM. Weight, 427 + grains. Plate J, n. 15 (British Museum ). 2. Obverse, same as the preceding. Rev. TETAS HAONEON BASIAEV3, on the ae of an indented square like the preceding. AR. MM. Weight, 417 2 grains. Plate J, n. 16 (British Museum ). The information transmitted to us respecting the ancient state of - Thrace is so very scanty and imperfect, that all monuments which tend to throw light on a country once so celebrated, and so remark- able for its early civilization, are particularly valuable and _inter- esting. The two silver octodrachms lately acquired by the British Museum , and now published for the first time, are extremely important as being the only monuments hitherto known, which relate to the Edones, one of the Thracian tribes most celebrated in history, and, at the same time, make us acquainted with a king of that people previously unnoticed. It is difficult to determine the precise extent and limits of the country occupied by the Edones, because, like other Thracian iribes, they were not long stationary, but moving in various directions, ac- cording to the chances of a desultory warfare. Being, with the Pierians, the most advanced of all the Thracian tribes on the side of Greece, they were probably those which, in early times, penetrated as far as Phocis, 5. ( 36 ) Beeotia and Attica (1), where some of them formed settlements : hence. the greater celebrity of the Edones, and the frequent use of their name by the early Greek poets, to designate the whole of the Thracian nation. When driven back from the south-eastern parts of Greece, they re- tired successively behind the Peneus and the Axius, and, for a long period they occupied Mygdonia, from whence they were expelled by the kings of Macedon (2), some time before Alexander the first. In historic times we find them on the left bank of the Strymon, bounded by the Nestus to the west, by the river Angitas and the Odomantes to the north, and by the sea and the Pierians to the south. Their principal cities were Myrcinus, Datus, Drabeseus, Eion, Ennea-Hodoi or Amphipolis, and besides various plains of great fertility, they possessed the rich mines of gold and silver of mount Pangeeum, Datus, Crenides and Scapte-Hyle, the most productive known in that age, and which afterwards afforded to the Macedonian kings the means of acquiring such an extensive empire. By the first: historic accounts of this people, we find that they were subdued, with the other Thracian tribes, by Megabazus (3), commander of the Persian army, after the retreat of Darius from his expedition against the Seythians. That prince, to reward the services of Histizeus of Miletus, gave him the city and territory of Myrcinus (4), where he formed a settlement (A. C., 507 ), but was obliged, soon after, to re- pair to Susa. Some years afterwards, Aristagoras, also of Miletus (5), the author of the Ionian insurrection, being obliged to fly, took re- fuge at Myrcinus, where he intended to establish a colony, but was killed in an action with the Edones (A. C. 497 ). The Athenians under Cimon having completed the expulsion of the Persians from Thrace, took possession of Eion, a colony of Mende, at (1) Tuucyprprs, lib. IL, cap. 29.—Srrazo, lib. IX, (3) Herovorus, lib: V, cap. 2. pag. 401. — Pausantas, lib. I, cap. 38. (4) Ipem, lib. V, cap. 11, 23—25. (2) ‘Tuveypiprs, lib. II, cap. 99. (5) Toem, lib. V, cap. 124126. ( 37 ) the mouth of the Strymon, and fortified it with great care, on account ofits important situation. Hence they attempted to establish a colony at Ennea-Hodoi, ‘thirty stadia distant from Eion, but were defeated with great loss by the Edones. Thirty-two years after, they renewed the attempt, but were again defeated by the Edones at Datus or Drabeseus (6). Twenty-nine years later (A. C., 437), the Athenians, under Agnon, were more successful, and founded on the above mentioned site the cele- brated city of Amphipolis ( 7). The Edones, nevertheless, continued to oc- cupy the greatest part of the country, and Myreinus, their strong hold and capital, remained in their possession till the death of their king Pittacus, who was murdered by his nephews and_ his wife. Myrcinus then surrendered to Brasidas, who had already taken Amphipolis. From this period we have Wo more accounts of the Edones, who, probably, like many of the other Thracian tribes, became incorporated with the Sithonian empire, till Edonis was reduced to subjection by Philip, father of Alexander. ‘ The two magnificent silver octodrachms now before us, are mo- numents which attest the opulence of the Edones , arising from the great and proverbial abundance (8) of the precious metals which their mines afforded; they show at the same time that the Greek language was in use among them. The type of their coins is precisely the same as that of the Oreskii or Oreste : a man with the causia or Macedonian hat is represented holding two javelins or spears, and guiding a yoke of oxen. Though of the same style of workmanship and of the same age, the inscription on one is PETA HAQNAN BAXIAEOQS, in the Doric dialect and the genitive case; while that of the other is reTAS HAONEON BASIAEY3, in the Ionic dialect and the nominative case. The use of the omega on one, while the other retains the more ancient omicron, is (6)"Tuveyprpss, lib. I, cap. 100, (8) Aros ceya6iv. Zenobius, Centur, IV, Adag. 35, (7) Inem, lib. IV, cap. 102. ‘ et Surpas, y. Aarde. ( 38 ) also deserving of notice. These variations can only be accounted for by the simultaneous intercourse subsisting between the Edones and the Greek colonies of different origin established in Thrace. History has recorded the name of one king only of the Edones, Pittacus, who died in 432. As the coins of Getas are of a more early period, there is reason to think that he may have been the predecessor of that king, ‘The workmanship refers to the time of Alexander I, who reigned from 500 to 454, A. C. The striking resemblance of the coins of the Edones here described to those of the Oreskii or Oreste, published in a preceding work (9), seems to imply contiguity or some intimate connection between the two nations. Hence, I am inclined to question my former. opinion, that the seat of the Oreskii was in that part of mount Hzmus, where Ha- drianopolis was afterwards built, a sitdation which is too far to the North, and too remote from the Hellenic cities on the coast.. It ap- pears preferable therefore to restore the coins inscribed QPPHZKION to the Oreste, who inhabited a district situated between Epirus and Macedonia, according to the opinion first proposed by various an- tiquaries, and particularly by M. Raoul-Rochette (10). A. circumstance which militates strongly in confirmation of . this opinion, is the representation of Centaurs which appear sometimes on the coins of the Oreskii, as it implies a people which inhabited or was connected with Thessaly, the country which all ancient traditions agree in considering as the seat of those fabulous beings. Nor is the other type of the coins of the Oreskii, identical with that of the Edonian coins here described, foreign to Thessaly, being essen- tially the same as that commonly seen on the coins of Larissa, Pe- linna, Pharcadon, Tricea, Pherse and other Thessalian cities (11), which represent a man in the national costume, seizing a bull; a subject (9) Ancient coins of Greek Cities and Kings.Lon- 116. don, 1831, pag. 39. (11) Pexxerin, Peuples et villes, tom. I, pl. 27, 28, (10) Lettres a lord Aberdeen. Paris, 1823,pag. 115, — Comsz, Num. Vet., Guil. Hunter, tab. 32.” ~~ ( 39 ) entirely Thessalian, and alluding to the national passion for bull-hunts and their address in subduing the most ferocious of those animals, and yoking them to the plough. The fable of the Centaurs, and the name given to them, was, in fact, derived, according to some ancient etymologists (12), from this species of hunting (dnd cod xevteiv n006 Fabpoug ), peculiar to the Thessalians. The Eordzi, a tribe bor- dering on the Oreste, were said to have been called Centaurs on this account (13). With regard to the Edones, though settled in historic times on the left bank of the Strymon (14), yet it must be remembered that they previously occupied not only Mygdonia, but a great part of Lower Macedonia, in conjunction with the Pierians, till they were expelled by the Temenidz, and obliged to retire behind the Strymon. They were therefore, like the Orestz, on the confines of Thessaly, and both these nations would consequently have adopted in many instances the man- ners and habits of the Thessalians, with so much the moré. facility, as the Thracians, Macedonians, and Thessalians, had a great national affinity. That the Oreste were a powerful people is fully proved by their maintaining themselves independent of the Macedonian kings till a very late period, and governed by princes of their own, who, from the name of Antiochus, one mentioned by Thucydides, appear to have been of Hellenic race. Since therefore strong motives prevent us from attribut- ing the coins inscribed OPPH2KION to a people inhabiting mount Hoemus it appears more consistent with reason, to refer them to the Mace- donian Oreste, a powerful nation and. celebrated in history, rather than to a tribe supposed to have inhabited -near mount Pangeum, but (12) Servius iy Viner. Georg., lib. IH, vers 115. (V. Avravdgo¢). It is probable also that they possessed (13) Stephan Byzant, v. Kyupos. the island of Thasos of which the ancient appel- (14) The Edones seem to have been at one period lation of Odonis appears to be an Holic form widely extended. According to Stephanus of By- of Edonis (Hesychius, v. Odov¢). zantium, they once occupied Antandrus in Mysia ( 40 ) whose existence unsupported by any ancient authority whatever, is only conjectural. It is indeed highly probable, under the circumstances alluded to, that the Oreste should have followed the example of the neighbouring kings of Macedonia and Pxonia, and of the Bisalta, who issued coins of a similar nature. irl es TRERES ? Fore part of a horse. Rev. TPIH in the four segments of an indented square. AR. 3.- Piatew, a. 17. Coins with the same legend, but different types, have been published, and various opinions respecting their origin have been proposed (1). This uncertainty arises in great part from the manner in which the letters are disposed, leaving it difficult to determine whether the reading is THPI, TPIH or TPHI. Accordingly, numismatists have ascribed them to Teria in Troas (2); to the Trieres, a supposed Thracian people (3); or to ‘Trieres, a city of Lycia (4); an opinion which seems probable on account of the ancient mythological relations between Lycia’ and Corinth, by one of whose colonies the coins in question seem issued. The question, however, remains still uncertain, and we must wait till some future discoveries throw light on the- subject. In the mean time another coin of, the same origin, but with a type totally differ- (1)'In compliance with the received opinion of (3) F. S. Srrzsrr. Numismata Greca ex Mus. the origin of similar coins, the present is placed Reg. Bavarie. Abhandlungen der Bayer. Akademie in sequence of those of Thrace. der Wissenschaften. Miinchen, 1835, pag. 124. (2) Dumersan, Cat. de M. Allier de Hauteroche, (4) Raovz-Rocurrrz. Journal des Savants. Aott tab. XTII, fig. 18. . 1829, pag. 301, 1, 3. ( 41 ) ent, is here communicated to the learned world. On one side, is the fore part of a horse, a type not confined to Thrace alone, but frequent on coins of Thessaly, Boeotia and Asia Minor; the reverse offers the usual legend disposed in the four segments of an indented square. Without offering any opinion on the subject, I shall confine myself to observe, that if, as supposed by most numismatists, the fabric is Thracian, the city or people to which these coins might be re- ferred, would be the Treres, a powerful Thracian tribe often mentioned in history, and who inhabited various cities destroyed by an inun- dation of the lake Bistonis (5). The Treres formed also settlements in Troas, Mysia and other countries (6) in that part of Asia Minor (7); of which the coins are easily confounded with those of Thrace. JENEIA iv PALLENE. Helmeted head with slight beard. Rev. AINEAZ, in a quadrangular area, round an interior square divided into four parts. AR. 1, Plate /Z, n. 18. A coin, in all respects the same, was published by Pellerin (1), among those representing illustrious personages, and he supposed it to offer a portrait of the Trojan hero Aineas; but without saying any thing as to the {time and place of its origin. Eckhell was of a different opinion (2), he takes the head on the obverse for that of Minerva, and the inscription to be the name of a magistrate of some unknown city. Several coins perfectly similar which have since come to light, show that the opinion of Eckhell was unfounded : 1° because the (5) Srrazo, lib. I, pag. 59. (1) Médailles de Rois. Paris; 1762. Pl. XX, (6) Ipeu, lib. XIII, pag. 586. page 205. (7) There was also a town named Trarium, near (2) Doct. Num. Vet., vol. I, pag. 348. Perperenen in the Troad, Srrao, lib. XIII, pag. 607. 6 ( 42 ) head represented is undoubtedly bearded, and might be taken for Mars, if it had not the character of a portrait, or of some heroic personage ; 2° the inscription on all these coins is invariably the same, whereas, if it referred to a magistrate, we should, according to the rules of probability, find different names recorded, as in all ana- logous cases, for instance, Abdera, Maronea, the Chalcidenses, etc., the same individual not remaining a great length of time in office. The workmanship, and other characters of these coins, being ge- nerally acknowledged as Macedonian or Thracian, point out to us the country where their origin must be sought for. Accordingly there appears to be the greatest reason forcassigning them to Aineia or Ainea, a city in the district of Crossza, in the Thracian Chalcidice. This place was celebrated in history as having been founded by, and received its name from Aineas (3), who wandering in search of a new settlement, after the destruction of Troy, landed here. During his stay at Atneia he lost his father Anchises, to whose memory he erected a funeral monument. Leaving this settlement, in consequence of a divine intimation, he proceeded on his voyage; but his memory continued in veneration among the inhabitants, and an annual festi- val was celebrated, in which he received divine sacrifices (4). The por- traits on the coins may therefore be considered as that of the Trojan hero, the founder of the city. - This city is generally called Atvaa by ancient authors, but it appears from good authority that Aivels was another form of its name, as may be inferred from Theon and Tzetzes, in their commentaries on Lyco- phron (5) and by other authorities, in particular that of Virgil. ‘Eneadasque meo nomen de nomine fingo. Aineid. TIT, 18. (3) Hexxaxscus Lesprus.in Drowys. Hatre., lib. f, (4) Tur. Liv., lib. XL, cap. 4. cap. 49.—Tzxrzxs in Lycophron, vers 1235.—Conon. (5) Ofoay Aiveatdae tabrny x0? Narrat. 46, — Vincit., #neid, lib. III, vers 18, Avxdepova, Steph. Byzant. V. Alvele.. Tzetzes in Ly- Schol. Iliad., lib. XIII, vers 459. cophron, vers 1236 i, Srouynwarivey tov ( 43 ) , The coins which confirm this statement, show that the name of the city was the same as that of the founder, according to many examples of the same kind which occur. Afneia was situated on the. coast of the Chalcidice, opposite to Pydna, on the gulph of Thessalonica, and fifteen miles distant from that city. Its situation has been a subject of discussion : some geographers have placed it at Apanomi, on the eastern side of cape Karaburnu; but Col. Leake is inclined to look for it rather on the southern side of that promontory (6). The prosperity of Aneia declined after its subjection to Macedonia by Philip. A part of its population was removed to Thessalonica by Cassander, and subsequently to the defeat of Perseus, it was sacked by the Romans. After that calamity, no mention of the city occurs in history (7). a= sy “= ARN w CHALCIDICE. Laureated head of Apollo. Rev. APN. A lyre with seven chords. AR. 3. Weight, 7*/, grains. Plate IV, n. 19. Some doubts may arise respecting the mode in which the legend should be read, and whether it is intended for APN or NAP; but the first reading appears the most probable. The resemblance of the coin in point of workmanship, and of the types both of the obverse e and reverse, to the coins of the Thracian Chalcidenses, concurs with the a inscription, in assigning this silver obolus to Arne or Arne, a city of Chalcidice. (6) Travels in Northern Greece. London, 1835, found in Herodotus, lib. VII., 123.— Scylax. Peri- vol. Il, pag. 452. plus, sect, 67.— Tr. Lry., lib. KL, cap. 4, lib. KLV, (7) Further notices respecting Aineia may be c. 37. Heyne, Excurs. I, in lib, UT. Aineid. 6. (44 ) This city is noticed by several authors, particularly by Thucydides (1). Describing the march of Brasidas to Amphipolis, he says, that the Spartan general moving from Arne in the morning, arrived towards the evening at Aulon and Bromiscus, where the lake Bolbe discharges itself into the sea, and after supper, continued his march to Amphi- polis. Col. Leake (2) supposes that Arne was the same place as that called Kaédzeva by Stephanus. The existence of which latter place on the Stry- monic gulph is shown by the name of Turris Calarnza, which Pom- ponius Mela mentions as between the Strymon and the harbour Caprus. So 0 Oo DIUM in CHALCIDICE. Head of Herculus covered with the lion’s skin. Rev. AIATON. Club and bunch of grapes. AE 3. Plate IV, 5 ity Be There can be no hesitation in attributing to Macedonia the present coin inscribed AIATON; but, as there were two cities called Dium in that kingdom, it is not so easy to determine to which of these cities it should be referred. The most famous of the two was the Dium in Pieria, ‘at the foot of mount Olympus, the great bulwark of the maritime frontier of Macedonia to the south, and often the residence of its kings. The other city of that name was a Chaleidian colony in the peninsula of mount Athos or Acte, and must have been of some importance, as it ® is mentioned by Herodotus (1), Thueydides (2), Seylax (3), and other 2 ancient writers (4). i To this last place, I am inclined to ascribe the coin under consi- deration, for the reason that the cities of Pieria, like those of the other (1) Lib. IV, cap. 103. Srepuan Byzawr. V. Kon. (2) Lib. IV, cap. 109, (2) Travels in Northern Greece. vol. II, pag. 170, (3) Atey, anvig, sect. 67. (1) Lib. VIL, cap. 22. (4) V. Leaxe, vol. II, pag. £49, ( 45 ) districts subject, at an early period, to the Temenidz, do nét appear to have enjoyed the privilege of coinage, whereas a great number of cities of the Chalcidice, and other independant districts, have left us a great abundance of coins, both in silver and copper, remarkable for their beauty, beginning from the earliest period of the art, and ending with the subjection of those places by Philip, the father of Alexander, who extended the boundaries of Macedonia as far as the Nestus. : It may perhaps be objected that we have coins of Pella and Pydna, but the objection is of no avail. ‘Those of the former city are of a late age, and after the Roman conquest. The coins of Pydna are of the period when that city was in the possession of the Athenians. The present coin, being then of an early age, must have been of the Chalcidian Dium. According to Pausanias (5), the ethnic name of the Pierian- Dium was Awasris, but probably the most prevalent form was that of Aue, recorded by Stephanus, which is retained in the Latin Diensis, constantly inscribed on the coins of this city (6), after it had received a Roman colony. From these frequent variations which we find in the forms of names, it is unsafe to draw any inference from them, unless supported by more positive authority. er 0-0-0100 OLYNTHIL CHALCIDENSES. OAYNO. Laureated head of Apollo. Rev. XAAKIAEON. A lyre with seven chords. AR 3: Plate IT, n. ar. Coins with the same types, and the legend XAAKIAEON, were for a long time assigned to Chaleis in the island of Euboea, till the late Mr. Payne Knight, with great propriety and judgement, restored them to the Chalcidenses of Thrace. ; (5) Lib. IX, cap. 30, 4. (6) Ecurrx, Doct. Num. Vet., tom. Tl, pag. 70. ( 46 ) The present coin which, in addition to the usual legend, offers, on the obyerse, that of OAYN® (for Odvvdiwv ), and the entire reading « of the Chalcidian Olynthians » is highly important, as it removes all dowht respecting the restitution proposed, and moreover shows that this* like all the other coins of the Chalcidic conitedarany, were struck at Olynthus. ; : This last fact might indeed have been inferred, ty as there exists no authority for the opinion that a city called Chalcis existed in Thrace (1), it became obvious that the capital city and head of the confederacy, was that in which the mint was established. Olynthus was one of the cities founded in Thrace by the Chalci- dians of Euboea (2). Subsequently it fell into the hands of the Bottizi, who possessed it till they were expelled by Artabazus the Persian ‘commander, who restored the city to the Chalcidians (3). From feeble commencements, it rose gradually to great opulence and importance, and became the head of the Chalcidian confederacy. This success: arose not only from. its advantageous situation, but from a_ policy, very unusual in Greece, of associating the citizens of the other confederate cities (4) in all their civil and political rights, instead of treating them as subjects and inferiors. The history of the rise and fall of this celebrated city is: so well known, that, without entering into particulars on the subject, it will’ suffice, as a summary of its power and greatness, to state, that hardly thirty years before its destruction, Olynthus had nearly overwhelmed the kingdom of Macedonia, and afterwards maintained a contest against Lacedeemon, then at the height of her power, and assisted by all the remaining strength of Macedonia. After the destruction of the city by Philip, it appears never to have been reestablished, as no farther mention of it occurs in history. The Olynthians, who had escaped and taken refuge in other cities, were (1) Lraxz, Trayels in Northern Greece, vol. III, (3) Heronorus, lib. VIII, cap. 127. pag. 456. ia (4) Mirrorp, Hist. of Greece, vol. VI, pag.106. (2) Srrano, lib. X, pag. 447. (5) Ivem, vol. VI, pag. 163. : ( 47 ) transferred by Cassander to Potidzea, when he enlarged that city, and gave it the name of Cassandreia. ; The head of Apollo appears on the Chalcidian coins, as the special protector. of the Confederacy, and the conductor (Aoyayérne ) of all the Chaleidian and Eubcean colonies. — 00-00 1 PEDNELISSUS 1 PISIDIA. AY T KOMO KAI ANTONEINOC.: Bust of Commodus bearded and laureated. Rev. PETNHAICCEON. Nemesis with one arm uplifted holding the two extremities of her peplos, and in the other hand a bridle (yz.éc). Before her, a griffin. AE 3. Plate IZ, n. 55. Only one coin of this city struck under Maximus Cesar, and in- scribed PEANHAICCEON was previously known (1). The present coin, of an earlier age, presents a portrait of the Emperor Commodus, with a figure of Nemesis on the reverse, and a difference in the orthography of the name of the city, written as in Strabo (2) with a T instead of a A. (1) Synecdemus, pag. 672. Edit. Wesseling. (1) Pzxrermv, Peuples et Villes, tom. Ill, (2), Car. a Sancto Paulo, pag. 19, 29, 51. pl. CXXXVI, n. 4. (3) Lesronp, Lettres, pl. I, n. 9. (2) Lib. XTV, pag. 667. (79 ) CHARACA in LYDIA? APOV30% KAIZAP. Juvenile head of Drusus. Before the head, a vase in countermark. Reo. MENO®ANTOY KAPAKI.... A caduceus. AE 3: Plate IV, n. 56. This coin, evidently of Asia Minor, but particularly of that part situated about the Meander and Hermus, is probably of a place (xéyn) called Characa, mentioned by Strabo (1) as situated on the road from Tralles to Nysa, and at equal distances. Stephanus speaks also of a city of Charax in Lydia, which he identifies with Tralles, but which perhaps may be the same with that above mentioned (2). edo. EUCARPEA in PHRYGIA. BOYAH €YKAPMEON. Veiled female bust. Rev. EPIMEAHOENTOC. T. KA. PAAKKOY. Diana in a long tunic, holding with one hand a bow, and with the other hand taking an arrow out of a quiver on her back. Behind her, a deer; on one side, a small female figure with the polos. AE 9. Plate II, n. 57. Under the character of the Eucarpian Council or Senate, BOYAHK E€YKAPMEON, the portrait of Sabina, wife of Hadrian, is represented on this elegant coin, struck in honour of that Empress by Caius Clav- dius Flaccus (ETIMEAHOENTOC. T.KA. PAAKKOY ), eponymous ma- gistrate of Eucarpea, whose name appears also on a coin in honour of Antinous (1), a proof that he was contemporaneous with Hadriaw. . The figure of Diana represented on the reverse, is often repeated on the coins of this city, and therefore offers probably a copy of a ce- lebrated statue of this divinity, who appears to have been highly vene- 1) Lib. XH, pag. 579. Lib. XIV, pag. 649. (1) Peziertn, Peuples et Villes, tom. II, pl. XLIV, pag pag: (2) V. Xdpaé. n. 32, — Haym, Tesor. Britann, ; tom. II, pag. 107. ( 80 ) -rated at Eucarpea. She is not attired in the costume of the chace, but wears a long tunic (Xtrdv moder), and her dignified attitude indicates that she is directing her arrow against Tityus, or some elevated per- sonage. She is accompanied by her usual attribute, the deer; and before her, is a statue with the polos, probably a more archaic repre- sentation of the same divinity. The elegance of this, and some other coins of Eucarpea, shows that the great opulence produced by the fertility of its territory, was directed to the honourable purpose of encouraging and cultivating the liberal arts, EUMENIA iw PHRYGIA. .... ANTONEINOC. Laureated bust of Antoninus with the palu- damentum. Rev. EYMENEON AXAION. Bacchus, and Ariadne playing on the lyre, on a car drawn by a panther and a goat; on the latter, Cupid is sitting and playing on the double flute. AE 2. Plate JV, n. 58. This rare coin of Eumenia presents a graceful and poetical compo- sition, which is perfectly similar to one represented on a medallion of the city of Tralles in Lydia, of the reign of Gordian (1). The same subject, but without the figure of Ariadne, appears also on a medallion of the Phrygian Laodicea, of the reign of Caracalla (2). These types attest the known devotion to Bacchus entertained by the people of Lydia and Phrygia, and probably are copies of some celebrated original. a O20 a GABALA ww SELEUCIDE. Radiated head, probably of Antiochus IY, Epiphanes. Rev. TABAAEON. A galley which appears lying before a building of two stories. AE 3. Plate IV, n. 59. The portrait of the obverse appears to be ofa king of Syria, probably (1) Mtonnet, Méd. Grecq., tom. IV, pag. 192. (2) Mronner, Méd. Grecq., tom. LV, pag. 328. (81 ) Antiochus IV, who is frequently represented on the coins of various cities of Syria and Pheenicia. j The reverse, which represents a galley moored before a building, has great affinity to the typeof a large silver medallion attributed to one of the Persian kings, but which was struck in. Phoenicia (1). On the latter, a turreted castle appears instead of a simple edifice. f 3 PHOENICIA. 1. Marine divinity holding a fish. Above, two Phoenician characters. Rev. A galley with rowers. AR 3. Plate IV, n. 60. 2 2. Marine divinity holding a circular object. Rev. A galley, with the sea indicated underneath. Above, two Phoe- nician characters. AE 3. Plate IV, n. 61. These coins, the one of silver, the other of brass, with the usual Phoenician galley, present the figure of a marine divinity, similar to the Hellenic Triton and Nereus, but which is probably the Dagon or Oannes of Phoenician and Babylonian mythology. The two characters inscribed are often repeated on Phoenician coins. eg ANTIOCHIA: m= MYGDONIA. Radiated head of Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Rev. ANTIOXEQON TON EN MYIFAONIA. Victory holding a wreath. On each. side a monogram. AE 3. Plate II, n. 62. The Mygdonians, originally Macedonians, who had served their time m the army of Alexander (1),'settled in Asia, and inhabited that part of (1) Mrownzr, Méd.Grecq., Suppl., t. VII, pl. XIX,n.4. (1) Srrazo, lib. XVI, pag. 747. elie ( 82 ) Mesopotamia, which was near the Euphrates, and the two Zeugmas. They possessed the cities of Tigranocerta, Carrhe, Nicephorium, and Neisibis, to which the name of Antiochia in seis was given by one of the Syrian kings. The present coin, which bears the portrait of Antiochus IV Epi- phanes, is the only one known that is inscribed with the name in question, which was not of long duration, but superseded by the ancient name of Neisibis, under which it is known by historians and by its numerous coins. ee CARRH/A ww MESOPOTAMIA. Bearded male head of a person advanced in years. Rev. XAPP. Three ears of corn. AE 3. Plate JV, n. 63. Coins of this city, struck under the Roman emperors, from'the reign of M. Aurelius to that of Gordianus Pius, with the legend KAPPHNON, and the title of Roman colony, are extremely common. The present autonomous coin is of a much earlier period, and the name is not written with a kappa, but with a chi, as in Josephus, the Septuagint version of the Bible, Eusebius, and Hieronymus; an ortho- graphy, in fact, more consonant to the Hebrew appellation of Haran or Charan. The ears of corn allude to the great fertility of the country. The head appears to be that of'some: petty king or dynast, like those who ruled at Damascus, Abila, and various cities of this part of the East. ATUSIA in ASSYRIA. Female head with a turreted crown. Rey. ATOVSIEQN TON [POE TON KAPPON. An arrow, and palm branch. AE 3. Plate Taam, n. 64. This coin is the same that was published by the Rev. $. Weston (1), (1) Archzologia , vol. KVI, pag. 9 and 89. ( 83) who ascribed it to Atusia, a city not recorded by ancient authors, but which, from the indication of its situation near the river Caprus, must have been in Assyria. Sestini questioned this attribution (2), and referred the coin to Atusia, a city mentioned by Pliny, and which he supposes to have been near the Caprus in Phrygia, an opinion entirely void of foundation. The passage of Pliny (3) adduced by this author is unintelligible. What he relates is not confirmed by any other authority, and seems ex- tracted from some fabulous story. Of what extent must a city have been, which, after its decay or destruction, had been replaced by twelve cities, two of which named by Pliny, viz Dascylos and Juliopolis, were at a distance of, at least, 180 miles from each other? It may be added that the situation on the Propontis indicated by. Pliny, could, in no case, be understood of a city on the Caprus, a river falling into the Meander, and near to Laodicea. a i _ The attribution of Weston may therefore be considered as incontest- able. The fabric, the form of the inscription, the arrow, symbol of the river Tigris (4),-all combine to refer the coin to the country 5i- tuated in that part of Asia. The name of the city is likewise Assyrian, as we know by ancient authors that Atossa was the national name of the personage called Semiramis by the Greeks (5), and we find various Persian princesses of the name of Atossa. It is therefore natural to infer that the city of Atusia was founded by a princess of that name, in the same manner as Ninus or Nineveh was called after a king of the same name (6). The difference between Atossa and Atousa can be no objection, and, in fact, the name is written Avroic« by Hellanicus (7). It.is to be farther observed that, Atusa or Atusia may have been (2) Lettere Numism., Serie Il, tom. VI, pag. 80. Atossa, qua et Semiramis, regnavit cum patre,ann.12. (3) Urbs fuit immensa Attusa nomine : nunc sunt — See also, Conon, Narrat. IX. XJ civitates, inter quas Gordiu-come, que Juliopolis (6) Srxano, lib. XVI, pag. 737. vocatur, et in ord Dascylos. Hist. Nat. , lib. V, 40. (7) Wexranticus, Fragm. CXXXIL, V. edit. 24. The (4) Srrano, lib. XI, pag. 529. name in this author is written Avrzsio2, but it iy (5) Eusrsrus, Chronic. An. Abrah. 583. Assyrio- evidently a fault of the transcribers. rum octavus decimus Belochus, ann. 25, cujus filia . Te ( 84 ) another form for Aturia, the name given to the district in which Ni- neveh was situated, the change of P into 3 being frequent. Strabo, it is true, places Aturia on the left bank of the Lycus (8); but probably its limits were far more extensive. It must indeed have been of con- siderable importance, since various .authors derive the name of Assyria from Aturia .(Q). DEMETRIAS in ASSYRIA. Female head with a turreted crown. Rev. AHMHT-PIEQN TON PPROE TOI TIFPEI. .A tripod. AE 3. Plate IV, n. 65. ( Mr. Steuart, Naples ) A city of this name is described by Strabo (i) as being near Arbela, in the province of Adiabene in Assyria, and, as its name implies, was founded by Demetrius, son of Antigonus, or Demetrius Soter of Syria, and inhabited by Greeks. Ptolemy calls it Coreura, which was prob- ably its ancient denomination preserved in the modern Korkour. No other coin of this city is known. REX PARTHUS. Bearded head with the Parthian tiara. Rev. Legend in Pehlvi characters. Persian mage or priest before an altar. AR 3. Plate JV, n. 66. ( Mr. Thomas, London ). This silver drachm, with the portrait of a Parthian king, supposed to be Arsaces VIil or IX, instead of an inscription in the Greek tongue, presents one in characters similar to those seen on the coins of the dynasty of the Sassanide. (8) Srrano, lib. XVI, pag. 737. Hellen., pag. 362. (9) Dron. Ciss. in Trojano. Sanaasrus, de 1) Lib. XVI, pag. 738. en ( 85 we MEREDATES er UIPHOBA. Bearded bust with the Persian tiara and candys. Rev. BACLI..... MEPEAAT. BACIAICC. YIDOBA. Female bust with ra- diated crown. YNA (Anno 454). AE 1, Plate IV, n. 67. A similar coin was published by Sestini (1), who mistaking the legend, attributed it to Peredates, an uncertain’ Parthian king, and to his queen Tryphene. The present, which is in better preservation, shows that it is of Meredates, and his queen Uiphoba, The following observations addressed to the author by Mr. Steuart, will afford a very satisfactory illustration of this singular numismatic monument. « Many similar coms are found in the vicinity of Bussorah, and are not unfrequently struck upon those of an Attambiltis, king of Characene. | /have remarked the date to be invariably YNA 454 of the era of the Seleucid, corresponding to about the 3° year of the reign of Antoninus Pius. As about 24 years previous to this date, mention is made of a king of Charax, named Attambilus, who assisted Trajan in his expedition on the Tigris, it may be presumed that he was the Attambilus of those coins which have been restruck by Meredates. The name was in fact common to the kings of that dynasty, several of whom were remarkable for their longevity. » ; «The coins of Meredates differ, however, in two material respects from all those hitherto known of the kings of Characene : 1° The heads of the latter bemg always uncovered, whereas Meredates is represented with the tiara; 2° The reverse, instead of the invariable symbol of Cha- racene (Hercules seated on a rock), having the bust of» a female in the Greek costume ». «The head of the king of Characene, of whom traces remain on the (1) Descriz. delle Med. Gr. del Mus. Hedervar. Part. III, Firenze, 1829; /tav XX XH, mi 15. ( 86.) coins restruck, resembles that engraved in the Iconographie of Vis- conti, pl. IX, n. 5, attributed to an Artabanus. But the inscription is plainly ATTAMB, which is unaccountably assumed to be... ATANS, for APTAPANOY. I may add, that the lengthened form of the B in YI@OBA entirely resembles that on the above mentioned coin. » « Of Meredates and his consort, I can find no historical record, and it is therefore impossible to say whether he succeeded to the kingdom of Charax by inheritance or conquest. The circumstance of so many of his coins being struck on those of his predecessor, would lead to the supposition that his succession was hasty and perhaps transient. » « About a century previous to this period, two Iberian princes, Mi- thridates and Pharasmanes, obtained possession of Armenia. Another Pharasmanes, towards the latter part of the reign of Hadrian, invaded and greatly disturbed the Parthian provinces ; to justify himself to the Emperor, he repaired with his queen to Rome, where he was favour- ably received by Hadrian, from whom he obtained many honours and an increase of dominions. » «If the identity of the names, Mithridates and Meherdates or Meredates, be admitted, the latter might possibly belong to the Armeno-Iberian family. At all events, the present coins strongly remind us of those of Tigranes and Erato. » BARCE iw CYRENAICA. AKEZIO2. Bearded head of Jupiter Ammon. Rev. BA. Silphium. AR 1, Plate IV, n. 68. The tetradrachms of this city were for a long time very rare, but of late years a large deposit has been discovered of coins of Cyrene and Barce, with various names of magistrates, and interesting symbols. a ( 87 ) | Among them was the present coin of Barce with the name of AKEXIO3, perhaps the eponymous Ephor. I avail myself of this opportunity to retract my former opinion(1), that the name of Ophilon.on a coin of Barce might refer to Ophellas, tyrant of the Cyrenaica. Among other objections, the coin is of an earlier age than that of Agathocles, in which Ophellas lived (2). (1) Médailles Grecques Inédites, pag. 79. (2) A. C. 308, THE END. ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS, oo 004 All the coins described in the present Sylloge without mention of the collections in which they are preserved, are in the possession of the author. —— Page 8. The note of Count Bartolomeo Borghese, relating to the coins of the Porcian family, which was intended to be inserted in the form of an Appendix, has been omitted; because in the interval of time elapsed, owing to a delay in the publi- cation of the present, the entire Memoir- of the learned author on the subject, will probably have appeared in the Giornale Arcadico of Rome, or will shortly appear. Page 42. An inscription lately found at Athens, containing a list of the different allied cities which paid tribute to the Athenians, with a statement of the sums paid, refers among the cities of Thrace, that of Aineia, whose inhabitants are called AINEATAI (Aiveuéizen). It has been published by Dr. Frank. Annali del? Istituto di Corresp. Archeol. Roma, 1836, Vol. VIII, pag. 118-130. Page 44. In one of the tables of the preceding inscription, mention is made of Dium AIEZ EKS AGO (Auets 26 Ado). At the same time another table of the same inscription records AIESA.....which the learned editor supposes to have been Avis, oF Acie om’ Abe (pag. 123). It is possible, however, that the reading may have been originally different, and instead of Azo there might have been some other word, as an A alone is visible. From this inscription it seems highly probable, according to the ingenious conjecture of Wesseling, that instead of the Dictidians described by Thucydides as allies of Athens, and inhabiting the peninsula of Athos, ArzriDriic of ev Ader (lib. Iv, cap. 109; lib. V, 35, 82), the reading should be Ates or Atiic. Page 48, n. 6. The tetradrachm in the British Museum, which is here attri- buted: to Potidea, is described by R. P. Knight as being of Tarentum. Nummi Ket. in Museo. R. P. Knight. Londini, 1830, pag. 289, K, n. x. Page 4g. The tetradrachm with the type of Artemis Tauropolos here described, is published by Goltzius. Grecia. Antwerp, 1644. Tab. XXII, n. 8. Page 78. A coin published by Pellerin ( Peuples et Filles, tom. II, pl. 136), as being of Myrrhina in fEolia, and one in Dr. Hunter's collection. ( Combe, Cat. Num. Fet., tab. 2, n. 18), attributed to Hadrianopolis of Thrace, ought pro- hably to be restored to Hadrianopolis of Pisidia. Page 84. The Parthian King, with the inscription in Pelhyi characters, described as being in. the Collection of Mr. Thomas, is in that of Mr. Steuart, at Naples. Page 85. A similar coin of Meredates has been attributed to Arsaces XXVI, Vologeses TI, by the Baron de Chandoir. Corrections et Additions ¢& louvrage du Cher. D. Sestini, ete. Paris, 1835, in-4. ERRATA OF THE PLATES. PAGES 27, Loncanz, for Plate II, read Plate I. 34, Ancutatus, for Plate II, read Plate I. PAGES 43, Anna, for Plate IV, read Plate II. 45, Orynrui, for Plate Il, read Plate I. a OF THE TEXT. PAGES g, note 3, after pyramides, read singulis. 13, line 14, for Phenicians , read Pheenicians. 17, note 6, for énéSekev, read amederbav. 29, 1. 9, for ZEVETZA, read SELEZTA. 30, 1. 2, for clus, read cipt. 34, 1. 18, for on many, read in many. 39, 1. 24, for Hoemus, read Heemus. — note 14, for ‘Oduvig read *Odwvis. 41, note 7, for Perperenen, read Perperene. 45, 1. 16, for Aréuc, read Areds. PAGES. 5o, last line, for of this, read of the. 51, 1. 7, for xotvov, read xowdv — note 4,°for Aeirepug, read Aevzépus. 53, note 7, for éva, read ea. — — for sictevar, read ciorévar. 64, 1. 7, for NEPON, read NEPQN. 72, note 4, for of the deity, read of the city. 73, |. 7, for magistrates, names, read ma- gistrates names. 000 INDEX. A. Axsperra, in Thrace, 30. Acnmaw Conreprracy, 60. Acro-Corinruus, figured, 56. JEnr1A, in Pallene, founded by Aiyzas, fia 7Enras, represented, 4t. FJEsernsa, in Samnium, 6. Anexanper I, of Macedon, 38. — the Great, 5o. = king of Epirus, 18, 29. Auipuetra, in Arcadia, 60. ALLEGORY, On coins to political events, 8. Atos, in Thessaly, 5r. Amazons, 31, 33. Ampracia, in Epirus, 54. Ampuaxitus, in Macedonia, 5o. Ampripous, in Macedonia, 49. Amypon, in Macedonia, 51. Awactorium, in Acarnania, 55. Awncuiatus, in Thrace, 34. ANDROMACHE, represented, 69. Antiocuta, in Mygdonia, 81. Apamea, in Bithynia, 62. Apotto, Archegetes, 23, 47 — Smin- theus, 66 — Didymeus, 70 — Py- thius, 73. Apoxtontus of Aphrodisias, 71. ApHRODISIAS, in Caria, 71. ARATHOOS, name of a river or magis- trate, 54. Arcos, in Peloponnesus, 5g. Aristoxenus, his account of the Posi- doniate examined, 17, 20. AristopHyzos, 56. Arwa#, in Chalcidice, 43. Assyrra, the name derived from Atu- ria, 83. Arturia, in Assyria, 83. Aramas, son of /Eolus, 52, 53. ATHENIANS, 23, 24, 28, 36, 37. Arramsitus, king of Characene, 85. Arossa, the same as Semiramis, 83. Arusta, in Assyria, 82. B. Baccuus, on a car with Ariadne, 80. Barce, in Cyrenaica, 86. Bettona, or Enyo, 32. Beryris, in Troas, 67. Bivatve Sueti, emblem of Cuma, 11. Burx, emblem of Italy, 8. C. Catywpa, in Caria, 72. KAMIIANON, the coins thus inscribed, struck at Neapolis or Cuma, 14. Campani, adopt the Greek language, 14. Capua, in Campania, 9. Caprus, a river of Assyria, 83. Carruz, in Mesopotamia, 82. Carracinians, 13, 24, 25. Caryatipes, 31. Cassanpreta, in Macedonia, 47. Cato (M Porctus), 7. Cato (L. Porcius), 8. 12 1 INDEX. Crncnreta, personified, 57. Centaurs, 38. Crrserus, on coin of Cuma, to. Craraca, in Lydia, 79. Cnaracens, kings of, 85. Cruces, original seat in Troas, 68, 70. Cuaucrpenses, their coins struck at Olynthus, 46. Cuaxciwice of Thrace, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47. Cnatcis, no city of this name in Thrace, 46. Cuxonis, daughter of Niobe, 5g. Curyse, in Troas, 66. CIMMERIANS, 10. Cisrurns, see Megiste. Comana, in Pontus, 32. Corontes, Phoenician, 29,—Roman, 19, 20, 2, — Chalcidian, 10, 13, 47, — Corinratan, 23, 26, 47, 54, 55. Conrepenacy, Italian, 1-8, — Chalci- pian, 46, — Achzan, 60. CorFinium, called Italia, 2. CorintH, in Achaia, 56, 57. Cra, its artifice, 12. Crimusus, river of Sicily, 30. Cuma, in Campania, ro. Cyzicus, in Mysia, 65. D. Dacon, Phoenician divinity, 81. Darius, king of Persia, 33, 36. Demernias, in Assyria, 84. Dia, in Bithynia, 63. Diana, Ephesia, 32, — of Cary, 31, —Tauropolos, 49,—in long tunic, 79. Dimyma, temple of Apollo, 7o. Dicamma, instead of aspirate, 22. Droca#sanrka, in Cilicia, 78. Dron, of Syracuse, 25, 26. Dionysius, of Syracuse, 25. Droscurr, 57. Drum, in Chalcidice, 44. Doe, figured on Sicilian coins, 30. Dyrracaiom, in Illyria, 54. E. EI, instead of EK, 70. Epones, a Thracian nation, 35, 4o. Ecrsra, daughter of Hippotes, 30. EMI, for eiys, on coin of Segesta, 29. Exyo, her temple at Comana, 32. EPET, on coin of uncertain origin, 62. ERNUM, Oscan and Roman termi- nation, 17. Ermanruus, Boar of, 13. Eucarpia, in Phrygia, 79. fumenea, in Phrygia, 80. G. Gaxpata, in Seleucis, 80. Genius, title given to Commodus, 63. Geras, king of the Edones, 35. Guaucus, marine divinity, 13, 81. Gorryna, in Crete, 61. Garerin, emblem of Teos, and Abdera, 30. Goxp, ancient scarcity of, 38, — Mines in Thrace, 36. H. Hamaxirus, in Troas, 66. Haprianopouis, in Pisidia, 77. Hxcror, represented, 67, 69. te ne oe INDEX. a i Hirroputes, 31, 33. Hipponium, in Bruttiis, 21.—Correction of a passage of Livy relating to it, a2. Hyprexa, in Caria, 73. HyLrarimene, in Caria, 74. Hyprrsorean traditions, 31. I. Ionraws, Apollo their chief divinity, 31. Traxia and Iraticum, name given to Cor- finium, 2. Tranian Cowreperacy, 1-—8. Iraty, personified, 1, 8. We Juno, Samian, g. Jupiter, Dodonzus, 49,—Laphystius, 53. L. Lacepzmon, 57. Larissa, in Thessaly, 53. Latona, 59. Lecuaum, harbour of Corinth, 57. Leontint, in Sicily, 23, 26. Lion, an astronomical emblem, 7r. Livia (the Empress), 71. ‘Loneans, in Sicily, 27. Lucantans, their language Greek, 18, 19. M. Macepon1a Prima, 4g. Maeynus, in Pamphylia, 76. Marine pivinity, 13, 81. Mars, his symbol a spear, 1. Manrsic, war, 3. Mecistx, island of, 75. Merepates, king of Characene, 85. Mrssanina, wife of Nero, 64. Messawa, in Sicily, 28. Mizetvs, in Ionia, 70. Miverva, Longatis, 27,—Chalcicecos, 58, —with bunch of grapes, 74. Morpacoras, 33. Myepona, 39, 81. Myrcinus, in Thrace, 33, 36. N. Natiorum, in Apulia, 15. Navanrculs, title given to Side, 76. Nemesis, 78. Neprune, Hippius, 47. NECYOMANTEIA, 10. Nic#a, in Bithynia, 64. Nersizis, in Mesopotamia, 82. Nisyros, island of, 75. Nomopuytactzs, of Sparta, 58. O. Otyyraus, chief city of the Chalcidian confederacy, 46. Opurynium, in Troas, 67. Opnettas, of Cyrene, 87. Orestz, of Macedonia, 38, 4o. Orrskul, coins of, 38, 4o. Oyster, on coins of Cuma, i2. iv Pattene, daughter of Sithonus, 48. Pavius Muritus, 2. Partuian Krive, 84. Pepwe.issus, in Pisidia, 78. Prrrene, the Fountain, 56. Petamys, or Tunny-fish, 65. Persians, 33, 36, 46, 48. Prrsonsrication, 1, 8, 11, 57, 73, 79. IV INDEX. Puiip of Macedonia, 41, 45, 46. Puoenictan, divinities, 13, 81—Inscrip- tion, 81. Purrxus represented, 53—venerated at Alos, ibid. ParsTEvia, in Campania, 17. Prcentra, in Lucania, 17. Pompzxpius Sixo, (Quintus), 2, 8. Porcius, see Cato. Ports, peculiar mode of construction, 77. Poriw#a, in Pallene, 47. Posipomia, in Lucania, 16. PraxiTeEves, statues by, 59. R. Ruopians, 75. S. Sacrep Mowry, of Miletus, 70. Sarernum, in Campania, 16. DAAIA, a sort of Calathus, 32. Samrans, occupy part of Crete, 61. Scyrza, a marine divinity, 13. SeRASTOPOLIS; In Caria, 73. Sreesta, in Sicily, 29. Servitsran Famity, coins of, 8. ZEIAA, on a coin of Posidonia, 16. Serre, represented, 65. Sizarus, River of Lucania, 16. Sito, see Pompzdius, Sins, in Lucania, coin wrongly attri- buted to it, 21. Sieontum, by error for Hipponium, 22. Sociatn War, account of, r—8. Spera, or Ball, attribute of Nymphs, 54. Sraters, of Cyzicus, 65. a Tzos, in Tonia, 30. Tasos, occupied by the Edones, 39 (14). Tnesx, in Troas, 68. Trieres, of Thrace, coins attributed to them, 4o. TPIH, coins inscribed, 4o. Treres, a Thracian tribe, 41. TriQuETRA, its signification, 69. Tunny-Fisn, emblem of Cyzicus, 65. Tyrrpeny, 12, 17, 18. Triton, 13, 81. U. Urenopa, queen of Characene, 85. YIOZ MOAEQS, Honorific title, 71. Uxenrum, in lapygia, 15. Vi: Venusia, in Apulia, 15. Versrum, in Iapygia, 15. Venus, armed, 56 — archaic statue of, Gp: Vino, the same as Eirov, 21. Vicrorra Virco, 8. xX, Xerxes, invasion of Greece, 47, 48, 52. Z. ZIB, termination on coins of Segesta, 29. deldet-seulp, Tage D. a ETE 5 oe er io i me ri ea eS oe PLT, Spee SNR atin ciliaans rr — ee. - ~~ ne a lee ee " ———_— j Se ‘ ae 6' a