.t«. ],t ^f^^^ ARCHITECTURE ENGLAND. Printed by GEORGE SMITH, Liverpool. Digitized by the Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from Research Library, The Getty Research Institute http://www.archive.org/details/architectureinenOOrick RUIHTSID CHAPKIL SoiTTH ?;inK OF r-HF CmiHrH OF S'' LAWRK.N'CK_KVKSHAM. ATITEMPT. DISCRIMINATE THE STYLES ARCHITECTURE ENGLAND, FROM THE (SToiKjurftt to ttfc lirformation WITH A SKETCH OK THE GRECIAN AND ROMAN ORDERS ; NOTICES OF NUMEROUS BRITISH EDIFICES; AND SOME REMARKS ON THE ARCHITECTURE OF A PART OF FRANCE. By THOMAS RICKMAN, F.S.A. Architect. FOURTH EDITION, With very coiisiderable additions, and new Plates LONDON: LONGMAN, REES, ORME, GREEN & LONGMAN. MDCCCXXXV. l&ntereD at stationers' fi^all PREFACE. An outline of the present essay was written by the Author for Smith's " Panorama of Science and Art,"' and pubhshed in that work many years ago, but having been frequently requested to enlarge and republish it, he has performed that task, and has subjoined a copious list of buildings for the student's instruction. The object of the present publication has been to furnish, at a price which shall not present an obstacle to extensive circulation, such a view of the principles of Architecture, more particularly that of the British Isles, as may not only be placed with advantage in the hands of the rising generation, but also afford the guardians of ecclesiastical edifices such clear discriminative re- marks on the buildings now existing, as may enable them to judge with considerable accuracy of the restorations necessary to be made in those venerable edifices that are under their peculiar care ; and also, by leading them to the study of such as still remain in a perfect state, to render them more capable of IV PREFACE. deciding on the various designs for churches in imita- tion of the English styles, which may be presented to their choice. As a text-book for the architectural student, little need be said of this publication. The want of such a work, particularly as it respects the English styles, is generally acknowledged ; and it has been the aim of the Author, by a constant reference to buildings, to instil the principles of practice rather than mere theoretical knowledge. This essay is by no means intended to supersede that more detailed view of English architecture which the subject merits and requires : an undertaking of this nature must necessarily be expensive, from the requisite number of plates, without which it is impos- sible to give a full view of this interesting subject ; but if his life be preserved, and time and opportunity be afforded him, the author may perhaps again intrude himself on the public, with a more comprehensive view of Gothic Architecture in Europe. If he be not so permitted, it is a satisfaction to him to know that he will now leave behind those fully capable of inves- tigating a subject which will richly reward the philo- sophic investigator. ADVERTISEMENT. 1 HE Author of this work cannot, in justice to his feelings^ appear a fourth time before the Public, without gratefully acknowledging the very flattering communications he has received from several eminent Prelates, and from various other distinguished Personages, both of the Clergy and Laity, in approbation of the plan he has pursued ; and he indulges the hope, that under the present circumstances the elucidation which he has attempted, of the real principles and essential differences of the styles of ancient English Architecture, will derive an increasing degree of interest. By these principles the Author has been enabled to adapt the beautiful details and decorations of ancient work to modern purposes, both ecclesiastical and domestic. How he has suc- ceeded, an examination of the Edijlces committed to his charge for design and execution, may best speak. Among many of the former may be enumerated — The New Court of St. John's College, Cambridge. The restoration of Rose Castle, Cumberland, the Palace of the Bishop of Carlisle. vl. ADVERTISEMENT. Oulton Church and Parsonage, near Leeds, founded and endowed by the late John Rlayds, Esq. Hampton Lucy Church, near Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire. The New Church, in the parish of St. Philip and St. Jacob, Bristol. The Churches of St. George, Birmingham, St. George, Chorlcy, and St. George, Barnsley. The Churches of Mellor, Over Darv\^en, Lower Dar^ven, and Tockholes, in the parish of Blackburn. The Churches of St Peter and St. Paul, Preston. Two Churches in the Cit}^ of Carlisle. St. David's Church, in the Citj- of Glasgow. St. Matthew's Church, Kingsdown, Bristol. St. Jude's Church, Liverpool. The Church of Lower Hardress, near Canterbury. The New Church, added to the ancient Steeple of the Grey Friars, Coventry. The New Belfry and Spire to the Church of Saffron Walden, Essex. The Church at Wliittle-le- Woods, in the parish of Leyland, Lancashire. The Church of Ombersley, Worcestershire. The Roman Catholic Chapel at Redditch. The Chapel and Asylum for the Blind, Bristol. Ja applied to Private Residences and Domestic purposes, the following, amongst others, will suffice : — Matfen, Northumberland, the seat of Sir Edward Blackett, Baronet. The Grove, near Dumfries, the seat of Wellwood Maxwell, Esq. Brunstock, near Carlisle, the seat of George Saul, Esq. Burfield Lodge, near Bristol, the seat of Edward Bowles Frij)p, Esq. Tettenhall Wood, Staffordshire, the seat of Miss Hinckes. The Residences of Colin Campbell and George Smith, Esqrs. Liverpool. ADVERTISEMENT. In addition may he mentioned. Monuments erected in the following Churches. In Everton Church, near Liverpool. Three in the Parish Church of Preston. In the Parish Church of Warrington. Gloucester Cathedral. Durham Cathedral. Buckden Church, Huntingdonshire. King's Norton, Worcestershire. Hampton Lucy Church, Warwickshire, &c. &c. CONTENTS. Page. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS i GRECIAN ARCHITECTURE « 11 TUSCAN ORDER DORIC 15 IONIC 21 CORINTHIAN -^ COMPOSITE 80 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES OF GRECIAN ARCHITECTURE- • 36 ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE 37 THE FIRST, OR NORMAN STYLE 46 THE SECOND, OR EARLY ENGLISH 56 THE THIRD, OR DECORATED ENGLISH 71 THE FOURTH, OR PERPENDICULAR 89 MISCELLANEOUS REMARKS ON BUILDINGS OF ENGLISH ARCH- ITECTURE, AND A COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES OF GRECIAN AND ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE 108 DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES OF ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE- • US ENUMERATION OF BUILDINGS ILLUSTRATING THE PRINCI- PLES OF ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE 121 ON SAXON ARCHITECTURE 299 ON THE ARCHITECTURE OF A PART OF FRANCE 309 INDEX OF BUILDINGS 323 9ln9ittempt (|c. JL HE science of Architecture may be considered, in its most extended application, to comprehend building of every kind : but at present we must consider it in one much more restricted ; according to which. Archi- tecture may be said to treat of the planning and erection of edifices, which are composed and embel- lished after two principal modes, ] st, the Antique, or Grecian and Roman, 2nd, the English or Gothic. We shall treat of these modes in distinct disserta- tions, because their principles are completely distinct, and indeed mostly fomi direct contrasts. But before we proceed to treat of them, it will be proper to make a few remarks on the distinction between mere house- building, and that high character of composition in the Grecian and Roman orders, which is properly styled Architecture ; for though we have now many nobly architectural houses, we are much in danger of having our public edifices debased, by a consideration of what is convenient as a house ; rather than what is correct as an architectural design. In order properly to examine this subject, we must consider a little, Avhat are the buildings regarded as our models for working the orders, and in what climate, for what purposes, and under what circum- stances they were erected. This may, perhaps, lead to some conclusions, which may serve to distinguish B that description of work, ^vhich, however rich or costly, is still mere house-building, in point of its composition. It is acknowledged, on all liands, that our best models, in the three ancient unmixed orders — the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian, are the remains of Gre- cian temples. JNIost of them were erected in a climate, in which a covering from rain was by no means necessary, and we shall find this circumstance very influential; for as the space within the walls was always partially, and often wholly open, apertures in those walls for light were not required; and we find, also, in Grecian structures, verj^ few, sometimes only one door. The purpose for which these buildings were erected, was the occasional reception of a large body of people, and not the settled residence of any. But, perhaps, the circumstances under which they were erected, have had more influence on the rules which have been handed down to us, as necessary to be observed in composing architectural designs, than either the climate or their use. It is now pretty gene- rally agTced, that the Greeks did not use the arch, at least in the exterior of their public buildings, till it was introduced by the Romans. Here then we see at once a limitation of the intercolumniation, which must be restrained by the necessity of finding stones of sufficient length to form the architrave. Hence the smaller comparative intercolumniations of the Grecian buildings, and the constant use of columns ; and hence the propriety of avoiding arches, in composi- tions of the purer Grecian orders. TheKomans introduced the arch very extensively, into buildings of almost eveiy description, and made several alterations in the mode of working the orders they found in Greece, to which they added one order, by mixing the Corinthian and Ionic, and another by stripping the Doric of its ornaments. Their climate, also, was so far different as to require more general roofing, but still, from the greater necessity of pro- viding a screen fi-om the heat of the sun, than aper- tures to admit the hght, it does not appear that large windows were in general use, and hence an important difference in modern work. Although, by roofs and arches, much more approximated to modern necessi- ties than the Grecian models, still those of Rome which can be regarded as models of composition, are temples, or other public edifices, and not domestic buildings, which, whenever they have been found, appear unadapted to modern wants, and therefore unfit for imitation. In a few words, we may sum up the grand distinc- tions between mere building and architectural design : the former looks for convenience, and though it will doubtless often use architectural ornaments, and pre- serve their proportions, when used as smaller parts, yet the general proportion may vary very widely from the orders, and yet be pleasing, and perhaps not incorrect ; but all this is modern building, and not architecture in its restricted sense ; in this the columns are essential parts, and to them and their proportions all other arrangements must be made subservient ; and here we may seek, with care and minuteness, amongst the many remains yet left in various parts, (and of which the best are familiar to most architectural students, from valuable delineations by those who have accurately examined them,) for models, and in selecting and adopting these, the taste and abilities of the architect have ample space. As an introduction to the dissertations, it may not be amiss to take a hasty sketch of the progress of Architecture in England. Of the British architecture, before the arrival of the Romans in the island, we have no clear account ; but it is not likely it differed much from the ordinary modes of imcivilized nations; the hut of wood with a variety of coverings, and sometimes the cavities of the rock, were doubtless the domestic habitations of the aboriginal Britons; and their stupendous public edifices, such as Stonehenge and others, still remain to lis. The arrival of the Romans was a new era ; they introduced, at least in some degree, their own archi- tecture, of which a variety of specimens have been found ; some few still remain, of which, perhaps, the gate of Lincoln is the only one retaining its original use. Although some fine specimens of workmanship have been dug up in parts, yet by far the gTeatest part of the Roman work was rude, and by no means com- parable with the antiquities of Greece and Italy, though executed by the Romans. The age of purity, in the Roman architecture, reaches down to several of the first emperors, but very early with a degree of purity of composition, there was such a profusion of ornament made use of, as soon led the way to something like debasement of composition. The palace of Dio- clesian, at Spalatro, has descended to us sufficiently perfect to enable us to judge of the style of both com- position and ornamental details; and the date of this may be considered from A.D. 290 to 300; and Constan- stine, who died in A. D. 337, erected the church of St. Paul, without the walls of Rome, which, in fact, in its composition, resembles a Norman building, and it is curious to observe that the ornament afterwards used so profusely in Norman work, is used in the buildings of Dioclesian, whose Corinthian modillions are capped with a moulding cut in zigzag, and which only wants the enlarocment of the moulding to become a real Norman ornament. AVhen the Romans left the Island, it was most likely that the attempts of the Britons were still more rude, and endeavouring to imitate, but not exe- cuting on principle, the Roman work, their architecture became debased into the Saxon and early Norman, intermixed with ornaments perhaps brought in by the Danes. After the conquest, the rich Norman barons, erecting very magnificent castles and churches, the execution manifestly improved, though stiU with nnich similarity to the Roman mode debased; but the introduction of shafts, instead of the massive pier, first began to approach that lighter mode of building, "vvhich, by the introduction of the pointed arch, and by an increased delicacy of execution, and boldness of composition, ripened, at the close of the twelfth cen- tury, into the simple, yet beautiful Early English style. At the close of another century, this style, from the alteration of its windows, by throwing them into large ones, divided by niullions, introducing tracery in the heads of windows, and the general use of flowered ornaments, together with an important alteration in the piers, became the Decorated English style, which may be considered as the perfection of the English mode. This was very difficult to execute, from its requiring flowing lines where straight ones were more easily combined; and at the close of the fourteenth century, we find these flowing lines giving way to per- pendicular and horizontal ones, the use of which continued to increase, till the arches were almost lost in a continued series of pannels, which, at length, in one building — the chapel of Henry the VII — covered completely both the outside and inside; and the eye, fatigued by the constant repetition of small parts, sought in vain for the bold grandeur of design which had been so nobly conspicuous in the preceding style. The reformation, occasioning the destruction of many of the buildings the most celebrated, and mutilating others, or abstracting the funds necessary for their repair, seems to have put an end to the working of the English styles on principle; the square pannelled and muUioned windows, with the wooden pannelled roofs and halls, of the great houses of the time of Queen Eli- zabeth, seem rather a debased English than any thing else ; but during the reign of her successor, the Italian architecture began to be introduced, first only in columns of doors, and other small parts, and after- wards in larger portions, though still the general style was this debased English. Of this introduction, the most memorable is the celebrated tower of the schools at Oxford, where, into a building adorned with pin- 6 nacles, and having mullioned windows, the architect has crowded all the five orders over each other. Some of the works of Inigo Jones are little remoAed beyond this barbarism. Longleat, in Wiltshire, is rather more advanced, and the banqueting-house, Whitehall, seems to mark the complete introduction of Roman workmanship. The close of the seventeenth century produced Sir Christopher Wren, a man whose powers, confessedly great, lead us to regret he had not stvidied the architecture of his English ancestors with the suc- cess he did that of Rome ; for while he has raised the most magnificent modern building we possess, he seems to have been pleased to disfigure the English edifice he had to complete. His works at St. Mary Alder- mary, and St. Dunstan in the east, prove how well he could execute imitated English buildinj^s Avhen he chose, though even in them he has departed, in several respects, from the true English principles. By the end of the seventeenth century, the Roman architec- ture appears to have been well established, and the works of Vitruvius and Palladio successfully studied; but Sir John Vanbrugh and Nicholas Hawksmoor seem to have endeavoured to introduce a massiveness of style which happily is peculiar to themselves. The works of Palladio, as illustrated by some carpenters, appear to have been the model for ^\ orking the orders during the greatest part of the eighteenth century ; but in the early and middle part of it, a style of ornament borrowed from the French was much introduced in interiors, the principal distinctions of which were the absence of all straioht lines, and almost of all regular lines. The examples of this are now nearly extinct, and seem to have been di'iven out by the natural ope- ration of the advance of good workmanship in the lower class of buildings. All ornamental carvings were with difficulty execut- ed in wood, and were very expensive ; but towards the latter end of the eighteenth century, the Adams introduced a style of ornament directly contrary to the heavy carving of their predecessors. This was so flat as to be easily worked in plaster and other composi- tions, and ornament was sold very cheap, and pro- fusely used in carpenters' work. This flatness was more or less visible in many considerable buildings; but near the close of the century, the magnificent works of Stuart and Revet, and the Ionian antiquities of the Dilletante Society, began to excite the public attention, and in a few years a great alteration was visible; the massive Doric, and the beautiful plain Grecian Ionic began to be worked, and our ordinary door-cases, &c. soon began to take a better character. The use of the simple, yet bold mouldings and orna- ments of the Grecian models, is gradually spreading, and perhaps we may hope, from the present general investigation of the principles of science, that this will continue without danger of future debasement, and that a day may come when we shall have Grecian, Roman and English edifices erected on the principles of each. GRECIAN ARCHITECTURE. The many valuable treatises and excellent delinea- tions of the Grecian and Roman buildings, and the details of their parts, will render unnecessary, in this dissertation, that minuteness which, from the total absence of a previous system, it will be proper to adopt in the description of the English styles. But in this sketch a similar plan will be followed, of first giving the name and gTand distinctions of the orders, then describing the terms and names of parts necessary for those who have not paid attention to the subject to understand, and a concise description of each order will follow ; with respect to the examples in England, it will be most proper to leave the reader to select his own, because in this country we have not, as in the English architecture, the originals to study, but a variety of copies, adapted to the climate, and to the convenience of modern times. In dividing the Grecian and Roman architecture, the word order is used, and much more properly than style; the English styles regard not a few parts, but the composition of the whole building, but a Grecian building is denominated Doric or Ionic, merely from its ornaments ; and the number of columns, windows, &c. may be the same in any order, only varied in their proportion. The orders are generally considered to be five, and are usually enumerated as follows: Tuscan, Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, Composite. Their origin will be treated of hereafter. Theii* prominent distinctions are as follow: Tlie Tuscan is without any ornament whatever. The Doric is distinguished by the channels and pro- jecting intervals in the fi'ieze, called triglyphs. The Ionic by the ornaments of its capital, which are spiral, and are called volutes. The Corinthian by the superior height of its capital, and its being ornamented with leaves, which support very small volutes. The Composite has also a tall capital with leaves, but is distinguished from the Corinthian by having the large volutes and enriched ovolo of the Ionic capital. In a complete order there are three grand divisions, which are occasionally executed separately, viz. The column, including its base and capital. The pedestal, which supports the column, The entablature, or part above and supported by the column. These are again each subdivided into three parts : The pedestal into base, or lower mouldings ; dado or die, the plain central space; and surbase, or upper mouldings. The column into base, or lower mouldings ; shaft, or central space; and capital, or upper mouldings. The entablature, into architrave, or part immedi- ately above the column; frieze, or central flat space; and cornice, or upper projecting mouldings. These parts may be again divided thus : the lower portions, viz. the base of the pedestal, base of the column, and the architrave, divide each into two parts; the first and second into plinth and mouldings, the third into face or faces, and upper moulding or tenia. Each central portion, as dado of the pedestal, shaft of the column, and frieze, is undivided. Each upper portion, as surbase of the pedestal, capital of the column, cornice of the entablature, divides into three parts: the first into bedmoidd, or the part under the corona ; corona, or plain face ; and cyma- tium, or upper moulding. The capital into neck, or part below the ovolo; 10 ovolo, or projecting round moulding; and abacus or tile, the flat upper moulding, mostly nearly square. These divisions of the capital, however, are less distinct than those of the other parts. The cornice into bedmouIcJ, or part below the corona; corowcf, or flat projecting face; cymatium, or moulding above the corona. Besides these general divisions, it W' ill be proper to notice a few terms often made use of. The ornamental moulding rimning round an arch, or round doors and windows, is called an architrave. A horizontal moulding for an arch to spring from, is called an impost. The stone at the top of an arch, which often pro- jects, is called a key-stone. The small brackets under the corona in the cornice, are called mutules or modillions ; if they are square, or longer in front than in depth, they are called mutules, and are used in the Doiic order. If they are less in front than their depth, they are called modillions, and in the Corinthian order have carved leaves spread under them. A truss is a modillion enlarged, and placed flat against a w^all, often used to support the cornice of doors and windows. A console is an ornament like a truss carved on a key-stone. Trusses, when used under modillions in the frieze, are called cantalivers. The space under the corona of the cornice, is called a soffit, as is also the under side of an arch. Dentils are ornaments used in the bedmould of cor- nices : they are parts of a small flat face, which is cut perpendicularly, and small intervals left between each. A flat column is called a pilaster; and those which are used with columns, and have a different capital, are called antcE. A small height of pannelling above the cornice, is called an attic; and in these pannels, and sometimes 11 in other parts, are introduced small pillars, swelling towards the bottom, called balustres, and a series of them a balustrade. The triangular portion over a series of columns is called a pediment, and the plain space bounded by the horizontal and sloping cornices, the tympanum ; this is often ornamented with figures or other work in relief. Pedestals and attics are far from settled as to their proportions, or the mode of their execution, depending almost entirely on circumstances connected with the particular design, rather than the order they are used with. However, for pedestals, about one-fifth of the whole height, including pedestal and entablature, is a good proportion, though it may be often necessary to to alter it from local circumstances. In general an order looks much better, executed without pedestals Columns are sometimes ornamented by channels, which are called Jiutes. These channels are sometimes partly filled by a lesser round moulding ; this is called cabling the flutes. If the joints of the masonry are channelled, the work is called rustic, which is often used as a basement for an order. For the better understanding the description to be given of the orders, it will be proper first to notice the mouldings which, by different combinations, form their parts. The most simple mouldings are, 1st, The ovolo, or quarter round. 2nd, The cavetto, or hollow. 3rd, The torus, or round. From the composition of these are formed divers others, and from the arrangement of them, with plain flat spaces between, are formed cornices and other ornaments. A large flat space is called a corona, if in the cornice; a face oy fascia in the architrave; and the frieze itseif is only a flat space. A small flat face is called a fillet, and is interposed between mouldings to divide them. 12 A fillet is, in the bases of columns and some other parts, joined to a face, or to the column itself by a small hollow, then called apophi/ges. The torus, when very small, becomes an astragal^ which projects; or a bead^ which does not project. Compound moiddings are, the ci/ma recta, which has the hollow uppermost and projecting. The cyma reversa, or ogee, which has the round uppermost and projecting. The scotia, which is formed of two hollows, one over the other, and of different centres. In the Roman works, the mouldino;s are orenerallv worked of equal projection to the height, and not bolder than the above regidar forms; but the Grecian mouldings are often bolder, and worked with a small retiu'n, technically called a quirk, and these are of various proportions. The ogee and ovolo are most generally used with quirks. Several beads placed together, or sunk in a flat face, are called ree dings. All these mouldings, except the fillet, may be occasionally carved, and they are then called enriched mouldings. From these few simple forms, (by adding astragals and fillets, and combining differently ornamented mouldings, faces, and sofhts,) are all the cornices, pannels, and other parts formed, and the modern com- positions in joiners, plasterers, and masons' work, are very numerous, and too well known to need describing. There are several terms applied to large buildings, which it is proper also to explain. A series of columns of considerable length, is called a colonnade. A series of columns at the end of a building, or projecting from the side of a building, is called a portico. A portico is called tetra style, if of four columns ; hexa style, if of six; octo style, if of eight. 13 Tuscan (Drtier* Though this is not, perhaps, the most ancient of the orders, yet, from its plainness and simplicity, it is usually first noticed. Its origin is evidently Italian, for the Grecian work, however plain, has still some of the distinctive marks of massive Doric, whilst the Tuscan always bears clear marks of its analogy to the Roman Doric. The pedestal, when used, is very plain, but the column is more often set on a plain square block plinth, which suits the character of the order better than the higher pedestal. This block projects about half the height of the plinth of the base beyond its face. The column, including the base and capital, is about seven diameters high. The column, in the Roman orders, is sometimes only diminished the upper two- thirds of its height. This diminution is bounded by a curved line, which is variously determined, but does not differ much from what an even spring would assume, if one part of it were bound, in the direction of the axis of the shaft, to the cylindrical third, and then, by pressure at the top only, brought to the diminishing point. The Grecian columns are mostly diminished from the bottom, and conically. The quantity of diminution varies from one-sixth to one- fourth of the diameter just above the base. The Tuscan base is half a diameter in height, and consists of a plain torus with a fillet and apophyges, which last is part of the shaft, and not of the base, as indeed all apophygse are considered to be ; and also all the astragals underneath the capitals, as well as the upper fillet of the base in all the richer orders, and in masonry should be executed on the shaft stones. The capital of the Tuscan order is (exclusive of the astragal) half a diameter in height, and consists of a neck on which is an ovolo and fillet, joined to the neck by an apophyges, and over the ovolo a square tile, which is ornamented by a projecting fillet. 14 The shaft is never fluted, but many architects have given to this order, and some have even added to the richer orders, large s(|iiare blocks, as parts of the shaft, which are called rustications, and are sometimes roughened. The Tuscan entablature should be quite plain, having neither mutules nor modillions. Tlie arrlr.- trave has one or sometimes two faces, and a fillet; the frieze quite plain, and the cornice consisting of a cyma recta for cymatium, and the corona with a fillet, and a small channel for drip in the soffit. The bedmould should consist of an ovolo fillet and cavetto. This Tuscan is tliat of Palladio ; some other Italian architects have varied in parts, and some have given a sort of block modillions like those used in Co vent Garden church, but these are of wood, and ought not to be imitated in stone. This order is little used, and will most likely, in future, be still less so, as the massive Grecian Doric is an order equally manageable, and far more elegant. Having explained the parts of one order, it will be necessary to make a few remarks, which could not so Avell be previously introduced. If pilasters and columns are used together, and they are of the same character, and not anta:, the pilasters should be diminished like the columns ; but where pilasters are used alone, they may be undiminished. The fillet and moulding under the cymatium, which, in rich orders, is often an ogee, is part of the corona, and as such is continued over the corona in the hori- zontal line of pediments, where the cymatium is omit- ted; and is also continued with the corona in interior work, where the cymatium is often with propriety omitted. In pediments, whose cornices contain mutules, modillions, or dentils, those in the raking cornice must be placed perpendicularly over those in the hori- zontal cornice, and their sides must be perpv ndicular, though their under parts have the rake of the cornice 15 Baric (Bvtjtx, The ancient Grecian Doric appears to have been an order of peculiar grandeur; simple and bold, its orna- oients were the remains of parts of real utility, and perhaps originally it was worked with no moulding but the cymatium, to cover the ends of the tiles, its triglyphs being the ends of the beams, and its mutvdes those of che rafters. In after times, its proportions were made '•ather less massive, and its mouldings and ornaments, chough not numerous, were very beautiful. The Romans considerably altered this order, and by the regulations they introduced, rendered it peculiarly difficult to execute on large buildings. As the exam- ples of the two countries are very different, we shall treat of them separately, and therefore first of the Grecian Doric. The columns of this order were, in Greece, generally placed on the floor, without pedestal and without base ; the capital, which occupied a height of about half a diameter, had no astragal, but a few plain fillets, with channels between them, under the ovolo, and a small channel below the fillets. The ovolo is generally flat, and of great projection, with a quirk or return. On this was laid the abacus, which was only a plain tile, without fillet or ornament. In the division of the entablature, the architrave and frieze have each more than a third in height, and the cornice less. The architrave has only a plain broad fillet, under which are placed the drops or guttae, which appear to hang from the triglyphs. The triglyph, in Greece, appears to have been gene- rally placed at the angle, thus bringing the interior edge of the triglyph nearly over the centre of the angular column. The metope, or space between the triglyphs, was nearly the square of the height of the frieze, and a mutule was placed not only over each 16 triglyph, but also over each metope. The cornice of tliis order, in Greece, consisted of a plain face, under the mutiile, which was measured as part of the frieze, and then the mutule, which projected sloping forward under the corona, so that the bottom of the mutule in front was considerably lower than at the back. Over the corona was commonly a small ovolo and fillet, and then a larger ovolo and fillet for the cymatium; and below the corona a fillet about equal in height to the mutule. The ornaments of this order, in Greece, were, 1st, the flutings of the colimm, which are pectdiar to the order, and are twenty in number, shallow, and not with fillets between them, but sharp edges. These flutes are much less than a semi-circle, and should be elliptic. '2nd, At the corner, in the space formed in the soffit of the corona, by the interval between the t\\ o angidar mutules, was sometimes placed a flower, and the cymatium of the cornice had often lions' heads, M'hi:;h appear to have been real spouts. 3rd, In addition to the drops under the triglyph, the mutules also had several rows of drops of the same shape and size. This order appears in general to have been worked very massive ; the be-st examples are from five to six diasneters high, which is lower than the Italians usually worked the Tuscan ; but this gave peculiar grandeur to the temples in which it is thus employed. Our present authorities for the Grecian orders are scattered through a variety of very expensive works, and in them presented in very irregular succession, whether we regard their supposed dates, their purity, or their orders ; and it would be a valuable present to the architectural student, if the good authorities of each order were collected, figured, and some account given of their variations. With respect to the Doric order, this has been ably done in a treatise by Edmund Aikin, from which we shall take the liberty of extract- ing a few remarks. 17 '* On viewing and comparing the examples of the Doric order, the first emotion will probably be sui-prise, at beholding the different proportions, — a diversity so great, that scarcely any two instances appear which do not materially differ in the relative size of their parts, both in general and in detail, and presenting differences which cannot be reconciled upon any system of calculation, whether the diameter or the height of the column, or the general height of the order be taken as the element of proportion. At the same time, they all resemble one another in certain characteristic marks, which denote the order ; the differences are not generic, but specific, and leave unimpaired, those plain and obvious marks, which enable us to circumscribe the genuine Doric order, within a simple and easy definition. " Interesting would be the investigation, could we trace the history of the Doric order in its monuments, and mark what progressive improvements it may have received in the course of time ; but of the monuments of antiquity few, comparatively, have survived the injuries of time, and the more speedy and effectual destruction of violence; and of these still fewer retain either inscriptions, or, in the records of history, the dates of their erection." The examples of Grecian Doric, of which we have accounts and figures, that may be depended on, are : The temple of Minerva at Athens, called the Par- thenon. The temple of Theseus, at Athens The Propylea, at Athens. The temple of Minerva, at Sunium. The portico of the Agora, at Athens. A temple at Corinth. The temple of Jupiter Nemeeus, between Argos and Corinth. The temple of Apollo, at Delos. The portico of Philip, at Delos. The temple of Jupiter Pannellenius, in ^gina. c 18 The temple of Minerva, at Syracuse. The temple of Juno Lucina, at Agrigentum. The temple of Concord, at Agrigentum. Tlie temple of Jupiter, at Selinus. A smaller temple, at Selinus. A temple at iT!,gcsta. Three temples at Pcestum. Our limits will not permit us to enter minutely into the question, which of these examples might be now considered as the most valuable for imitation ; but one circumstance it is requisite to notice, which is, that in the Athenian examples, and many of the others, the architrave projects over the top of the shaft, so as to be nearly perpendicular to the front of the bottom of the shaft, an arrangement never seen at Rome, but which contributes much to the boldness of the Grecian temples : and it is curious to observe, that in the temple of Apollo at Delos, of Concord at Agrigentum, and the temple at ^Egesta, this projection is very small, compared with that of the other examples; and that in the portico of Philip, at Delos, and all the temples at Poestum, there is no projection, but the face of the architrave is set over the diminished part of the shaft, the same as in Roman examples. Two of the temples at Poestum have capitals, with some trivial additions about the neck, and such a gTeat projection of the echinus and abacus, as well as some appearances in the entablature, that take very much from their beauty. The other temple at Poestum has (excepting the projection above spoken of) all the characters of the Grecian examples. On the whole, the temples of ^linerva and Theseus at Athens, and INIinerva at Sunium, appear those examples which deserve the most attentive considera- tion, as well from the general beauty of the composi- tion, as the excellence of the details and execution. But in this order, as well as in Architecture generally, the duty of the Architect is not to be a servile copyist 19 of any example, however fine, but by seizing the principles and spirit, of the age of his best models, to form such a composition as, by its fitness for the purpose to which it is applied, should appear that edifice which, for a similar purpose, the great Archi- tects, whose works he seeks rather to renew than imitate, would have erected. Roman Doric. This differs from the Grecian in several important particulars, which will appear from the following rules : from the strictness of which follows that extreme difHculty of execution which has been so often com- plained of in this order: 1st, the triglyphs must be precisely over the centre of the columns; 2d, the metopes must be exact squares; 3d, the mutules also must be exact squares. As, therefore, the intercolumniation must be of a certain number of triglyphs, it will be easily conceived how difficult it will be, in large buildings, where a triglyph is several feet, to accommodate this order to the internal arrangements. The Roman Doric is sometimes set on a phnth, and sometimes on a pedestal, which should be of few and plain mouldings. The bases usually employed, are either the attic base of a plinth, lower torus, scotia, and upper torus, with fillets between them, or the proper base of one torus and an astragal ; or, in some instances, of a phnth and simple fille'^ The shaft, including the base and capital, each of which is half a diameter, is generally eight diameters high, and is fluted like the Grecian. The capital has an astragal and neck under the ovolo, which has sometimes three small fiUets projecting over each other, and sometimes another astraoal and fillet. The ovolo should be a o true quarter round. The abacus has a small ogee and fillet on its upper edge. 20 The architrave has less height than the Grecian, being only two-thirds of the frieze, which is equal in height to the cornice. In a few instances the archi- trave has two faces, but mostly only one. The frieze has nothing peculiar to this mode ; if plain, its metopes being, as before observed, squ^ire. The cornice differs much from the Grecian, having its soffit flat, and the mutules square, with a square interval between them. The Grecian drops in the mutules generally appear in front, below the mutules ; but the Roman do not, and are sometimes omitted ; the drops also are of a different shape, being more complete cones. The cymatium is often a cavetto, and sometimes a cyma recta, with an ogee under it. The mutules have a small ogee, which runs round them, and also round the face they are formed of; and under the mutules are an ovolo and small fillet, and the flat fiJlet which runs round the top of the trigiyphs here belongs to the cornice, and not, as in the Grecian, to the frieze. The Roman Doric is susceptible of much ornament, for in addition to the flutes, the guttee of the trigiyphs, and the roses in the soflit of the corona, the neck of the capital has sometimes eight flowers or husks placed round it, the ovolo carved, and the metopes in the frieze filled with alternate ox-skulls and paters, or other ornaments. In interior decorations, sometimes one or two of the mouldings of the cornice are enriched ; but with all this ornament, the Roman Doric is far inferior, in real beauty, to the Grecian. The Doric we have now described, and its rules, should rather be considered Italian than Roman ; for it is in fact the Doric worked by modern Italian architects, rather than the Doric of ancient Rome, of which we have only one example, which is far from giving such a Doric as above described. This example is the theatre of Marcellus, which has dentils in the cornice, and of which the corona 21 was so decayed even near 150 years back, as to give no trace of any thing but an indication of a mutule, which appears a little like a Grecian mutule. This theatre is considered to have been erected by Augustus, and it appears most probable that the portico of the Agora, at Athens, was erected about the same time ; if so, it becomes a curious question, how and why the order should be so altered in Rome. The first order of the Coliseum is a much later work, and is extremely poor in its combinations, but has a capital very much like the theatre of JNIarcellus, and its cornice has an uncut dentU face. iont'c (f^rtier* As the Greeks and Romans differed much in their modes of working the Doric Order, so there was considerable difference in their execution of the Ionic, though by no means so great as in the former. The distinguishing feature of this order is the capital, which has four spiral projections called volutes. These in Greece were placed flat on the front and back of the column, leaving the two sides of a different character, and forming a balustre; but this at the external angle producing a disagreeable effect, an angular volute was sometimes placed there, showing two volutes, one flat the other angular, to each exterior face, and a balustre to each interior; but this not forming a good combination, a capital was invented with four angular volutes, and the abacus with its sides hollowed out. This is called the modern Ionic capital. In the ancient, the list or spiral line of the volute runs along the face of the abacus, straight under the ogee; but in the modern, this list springs from behind the ovolo, and in the hollow of the abacus, which is an ovolo, fillet, and cavetto, is generally placed a flower. The abacus of the ancient capital has only a small ogee for its moulding. There are examples at Athens of an astragal to the ancient Ionic capital below the volutes, lea^^ng a neck 22 which is adorned with carvings, but these examples are rare. The Ionic shaft, including the base, which is half a diameter, and the capital to the bottom of the volute generally a little more, is about nine diameters high. The pedestal is a little taller, and more ornamented than the Doric. The bases used to this order are very various ; some of the Grecian examples are of one torus and two scoti^e, with astragals and fillets ; others of two large tori and a scotia of small projection; but the attic base is very often used, and with an astragal added above the upper torus, makes a beautiful and appro- priate base for the Ionic. The cornices of this order may be divided into three divisions; 1st, the plain Grecian cornice; 2nd, the dentil cornice; 3d, the modillion cornice. In the first, the architrave is of one or two faces; the frieze plain, and the cornice composed of a corona with a deep soffit, and the bedmould moulding hidden by the drip of the soffit, or coming very little below it. The cymatium generally a cyma recta, and ogee under it. The second has generally two faces in the architrave, and the cornice, which is rather more than one-third of the height of the entablature, has a corona with a cyma recta and ogee for cymatium, and for bed- moidd a dentil face between an ovolo and ogee. The soffit of the corona is sometimes ornamented. The third, or modillion entablature, has the same architrave, frieze, and cymatium of its cornice as the last, but under the soffit of the corona are placed modillions, which are plain, and surrovmded by a small ogee; one must be placed over the centre of each column, and one being close to the return, makes a square panncl in the soffit at the corner, and between each modillion, which is often filled with a flower. 23 The bedmould below is generally an ovolo fillet and cavetto. This modillion cornice is, in fact, as well as the capital, rather Italian than Roman, as the ancient examples have the dentil cornice ; and in point of time, there may be some doubt, whether the modern Ionic capital is not rather a deduction from the Composite than the contrary ; for the angular volute of Greece is not such a one as, if repeated, would make the modern Ionic capital. The alteration of this order is in many respects valuable, for although not equal in simplicity to the Grecian Ionic, yet it is so easily manageable, especially with a dentil cornice, as to be easily adapted to modern wants ; and when executed on a large scale, the modillion cornice has a bold effect. The great difficulty in the Grecian Ionic is the return at the angle ; it does not look well to have a column sideways in a range with others fronting, and this arrangement is so often wanted, and so ill attained by the Greek angular volute, that many times there is no alternative but the use of the modern capital. It was once the custom to work the Ionic frieze projecting like a torus, thus giving an awkward weight to an order which ought to be light. The introduction of good Grecian models has driven out this impropriety, and much improved the present execution of the order, which is very beautiful, if well executed. The Ionic shaft may be fluted in twenty-four flutes, with fillets between them; these flutes are semi- circular. This order may be much ornamented if necessary, by carving the ovolo of the capital, the ogee of the abacus, and one or two mouldings of both architrave and cornice; but the ancient Ionic looks extremely well without any ornament whatever. Our Ionic examples are not so numerous as the Doric, nor so complete, several of them not being entirely figured without conjecture. They are : The temple on the Illisus, at Athens. 24 The temples in tlie Acropolis, of INIinerva Polias, and Erichtheiis. The aqueduct of Adrian, at Athens. The temple of Apollo Didymeus, at INIiletus. The temple of Bacchus, at Teos. The temple of INIinerva Polias, at Priene. The temple of Fortuna A'irilis, at Rome. Of these, for simplicity and elegance of composition, the now-destroyed temple on the Illissus, is pre-eminent; its volutes plain, but of excellent proportion, and it had an angidar Aolute to the external capital ; its base was in mouldings the attic, but the tori were large, and the scotia flat ; there was a small astragal above the upper torus, and that torus was cut into small flutes. The entablature was very plain, having an architrave of one face only, a frieze plain, but which there is some reason to suppose was carved in some parts, and a corona with deep soffit, and for bedmould only an ogee, with a fillet above, and astragal below. The temples in the Acropolis are small, but extremely rich, having many members carved. The cornice is the same as the last example, but the architrave is of three faces. There are three ranges of columns, and the capitals of each have minute differences, but they may all be described together : they have an ornamented neck and astragal below the volutes ; the fillets of the volutes are double, thus making the volute much more elaborate, though not more beautiful; the bases are enriched with carvings, and the columns fluted ; the bases are nearly those of the last example, but want the astragal. Of these examples, the architraves have a small projection from the top of the column, though not near so much as the Doric. The aqueduct of Adrian is plain, but of good com position ; it has a good volute, an architrave of two faces, and a small projection in front of the column; a plain frieze, and a good plain dentil cornice. The temples of INIinerva Polias, at Priene, and Apollo, at INliletus, have a base which is curious, but 25 by no means deserving of imitation ; it consists of a large torus, resting on two scoti^e, which are divided from it, and from each other and the plinth, by two astragals at each division. This base gives the column so unsteady an appearance, that it spoils an otherwise beautiful order. The temple of Bacchus, at Teos, has an attic base with an astragal added, and a cornice with dentils of of greater projection than usual. These three last examples have their volutes smaller than those of Athens, which takes much from the grandeur of the order. The temple of Fortuna Virilis, at Rome. This example is far inferior to those we have before noticed. The Romans seem to have had a singular predilection, particularly in their declining works, for very large fillets, and it is abundantly shown in this edifice, where the fillet of the tenia of the architrave is very nearly as large as the ogee under it, and larger than one face of the architrave ; this, though the capital is pretty good, spoils the order, and the cornice is poor from the trifling appearance of the corona. The base is the attic of very good proportion. The temple of Concord, at Rome, is figured by Deso'odels, but it is only remarkable for its deformity, and having an appearance of the modern Ionic. The capitals have angular volutes, but under the usual ovolo and astragal is a cyma recta, enriched with leaves, and a large astragal and fillet. The entablature is of a very poor character, and has small dentils and large plain modillions. The base is of two tori divided by two scotice, which are separated by a fillet. In this example, the fillet on the bottom of the shaft is nearly as large as the upper torus. 20 a?0n'ntl)ian #rtrer. This order originated in Greece, and the capital is said to have been suggested by observing a tile placed on a basket left in a garden, and round Avhich sprung up an acanthus. All the other orders have, in various countries and situations, much variety ; but the Corinthian, though not without slight variations, even in the antique, is much more settled in its proportions, and its greater or less enrichment is the principal source of variety. The capital is the great distinction of this order; its height is more than a diameter, and consists of an astragal, fillet and apophyges, all of which are measured with the shaft, then a l3ell and horned abacus. The bell is set round with two rows of leaves, eight in each row, and a third row of leaves supports eight small open volutes, four of which are under the four horns of the abacus, and the other four, which are sometimes interwoven, are under the central recessed part of the abacus, and have over them a flower or other ornament. These volutes spring out of small twisted husks placed between the leaves of the second row, and which are called cnulicoles. The abacus consists of an ovolo, fillet, and cavetto, like the modern Ionic. There are various modes of indenting the leaves, which are called, from these variations, acanthus, olive, kc. The column, including the base of half a diameter, and the capital, is about ten diameters high. Of the Corinthian capital, although the best exam- ples have all some trifling difference, principally in the raflling of the leaves, and the connexion of the central small volutes; yet there is one capital so different from the others that it deserves some remark, more especially as it has been lately introduced into some considerable edifices. This capital is that of the circular temple at Tivoli, called by some a temple of Vesta, by others the Sybils' temple. In this capital the angular volutes are large, so much so as to give the capital the 27 air of a Composite, till more minutely examined ; it is however a real Corinthian, for it has central volutes, though they are small, and formed out of the stalks themselves, and not as in the ordinary capital rising from them. Its great beauty, however, is the very bold manner of raffling the leaves, which gives it a very different appearance from the other capitals, and one which, in particular circumstances, may make it valuable. The flower over the centre volutes, is very different from the common one, and much larger. If a pedestal is used, it should have several mould- ings, some of which may, if necessary, be enriched. The base may be either an attic base, or with the addition of three astragals, one over each torus, and one between the scotia and upper torus; or a base of two tori and two scotise, which are divided by two astragals, and this seems the most used to the best examples; one or two other varieties sometimes occur. The entablature of this order is very fine. The architrave has mostly two or three faces, which liaA^e generally small ogees or beads between them. The frieze is flat, but is often joined to the upper fillet of the architrave by an apophyges The cornice has both modillions and dentils, and is usually thus composed; above the corona is a cyma- tium, and small ogee; under it the modillions, whose disposition, like the Ionic, must be one over the centre of the column, and one close to the return of the cornice. These modillions are carved with a small balustre front, and a leaf under them; they are surrounded at the upper part by a small ogee and fillet, which also runs round the face they spring from. Under the modillions is placed an ovolo, and then a fillet and the dentil face, which is often left uncut in exterior work. Under the dentils are a fillet and ogee. In some cases this order is properly worked with a plain cornice, omitting the modillions, and leaving the dentil face uncut. 2B The enrichments of this order may be very con- siderable; some of the moiddings of the pedestal and base may be enriched ; the shaft may be fluted, as the Ionic, in twenty-four flutes, "vvhich may be filled one- third high by staves, which is called cabling the flutes ; the small mouldings of the architrave, and even some of its faces, and several mouldings of the cornice, may be enriched; the squares in the soffit of the corona pannellcd and flov>ered, and the frieze may be adorned Avith carvings. But though the order will bear all this ornament without overloading it, yet, for exteriors, it seldom looks better than when the capitals and the modillions are the only carvings. The principal Corinthian examples are in Rome; there are, however, some Grecian examples, which we shall first notice : A portico, at Athens. The arch of Adrian, at Athens. The Incantada, at Salonica. A temple at Jackly, near Mylassa. Of these, thefii'st has an entablature, which is almost exactly that W'hich has been generally used for the Composite; the others have all dentil cornices, wdthout modillions. In two examples, the horns of the abacus, instead of being cut off" as usual, are continued to a point, wdiich gives an appearance of w^eakness to the capital. The bases are mostly attic, wdth an additional astragal, and at Jackly the tori are carved. The temple of Vesta, at Tivoli, has the capital noticed above ; its entablature is simple, with an uncut dentil face, and the frieze carved in festoons. The astragal, under the capital, has a fillet above, as well as below, and the base has a fillet under the upper torus omitted. The flutes are stopt square, and not as usual rounded at the ends. The remain, called the fi'ontispiece of Nero, has the complete block entablature, usually called Com- posite. The capitals good, with attic base, and the whole of good character. 29 The temple of Vesta, at Rome, The BasiHca of Antoninus, and The temple of JNIars the Avenger, are all incomplete; the first has pointed horns, and the two first the attic base. The temple of Antoninus and Faustina, and The portico of Severus, have both a cornice with dentil face only, and uncut; the first an attic base. The baths of Dioclesian have a good entablature, and the attic base ; some of the capitals are Composite. The forum of Nerva, The inner order of the Pantheon, The outer order of the Pantheon, The temple called Jupiter Tonans, and The temple called Jupiter Stator, are all excellent, and beautiful in their proportions and execution; the fillets small, and the order much enriched. The forum of Nerva, and the temple of Jupiter Tonans, have no bases visible ; the others have the real Corinthian base with two scotiae. The last may be considered the best existing model of Corinthian ; it is one of the most enriched, and nothing can better stamp its value than a minute and rigorous examina- tion of it with any of the other examples. These are only a part of the antique remains of this order, but they are the best known, and may be sufficient to induce the student to examine every example for himself. It will not be right to quit this order without adverting to two stupendous magazines of it, the ruins of Balbec and Palmyra ; but although they are worth examining as matters of curiosity, they are of com- paratively little value; however rich, they contain much of the faulty and crowded detail of the later Roman work, and to what extent this was cari'ied in very great Roman works, the best evidence is the palace of Dioclesian, at Spalatro, where, amidst a proliision of ornament, Ave meet with great poverty 30 of composition, and combinations of mouldings so barbarous as to lead to a degree of astonishment, how they could be executed by persons before whose eyes were existing such examples as Home even now contains. In the decline of the lloman empire, it became a fashion to remove columns; there are therefore in Rome, many edifices with a variety of valuable columns erected without their own entablature; and Constantine, in the church of St. Paul without the walls, began the Norman arrangement by springing arches off the columns without an entablature, and carrying up the wall to the clerestory windows, with little or no projection; thus annihilating the leading feature of the orders — a bold cornice. iffompasite (BvXitv. The Romans are said to have formed this order by mixing the Corinthian and Ionic capitals; like the Corinthian, the capital is its principal distinction. This is of the same height as the Corinthian, and it is formed by setting, on the two lower rows of the leaves of the Corinthian capital, the modern Ionic volutes, ovolo, and abacus. The small space left of the bell is filled by caulicoles, with floAvers, and the vipper list of the volute is often flowered. From the great variety of capitals which are not Corinthian, (for it seems most commodious to term those only Corinthian which have four volutes in each face, or rather eight sets roimd the capital; four at the angles and four in the centre,) it may seem at first difficult to say what should be called Composite, and what considered as merely a Composed order; but there appears an easy way of designating the real Composite capital, viz. that of considering the Ionic volute, and the Ionic ovolo and astragal under the abacus, as essential parts; for this ovolo and astragal not existing in Corinthian capitals, forms a regular distinction between the two. 31 The column is of the same height as the Corinthian, Rnd the pedestal and base differ very little from those of that order, the pedestal being sometimes a little plainer, and the base having an astragal or two less. The entablature mostly used with this order is plainer than the Corinthian, having commonly only two faces to the architrave, the upper mouldings being rather bolder; and the cornice is different, in having, instead of the modillion and dentil, a sort of plain doidDle modillion, consisting of two faces, the upper projecting farthest, and separated from the lower by a small ogee ; imder this modillion is commonly a large ogee, astra- gal, and fillet. The assumption of this entablature for the Composite is rather Italian than Roman, for the examples of Composite capitals in Rome have other entablatures, and this is found with Corinthian capitals ; but we must suppose that Palladio and Scammozzi, w^ho both give this cornice to the Com- posite, had some authority on w^hich they acted, and considering the great destruction of ancient buildings for their columns, this is not improbable. A plain cornice, nearly like that used to the Corin- thian order, is sometimes used to this order, and also a cornice with the modillions bolder, and cantalivers under them in the frieze. This order may be enriched in the same manner as the Corinthian. The Composite examples we have to notice are few, and these are. The temple of Bacchus, The arch of Septimus Severus, and The arch of the Goldsmiths. These are all at Rome, and all have an attic base ; they have all large fillets. The first entablature is plain, and has no dentil face ; the second has a dentil face cut, as has the third, but the latter has an awkward addition of a second ogee under the dentils, apparently taken out of the frieze, which is thus made very small. 32 The baths of Dioclesiaii : — this example is placed in the same room with Corinthian colimms ; it has an attic base, and the Corinthian entablature. The arch of Titus: — this example has a real Corin- thian base and entablature; in short, it has nothing Composite but the capital. On the whole, an attentive examination of the subject will lead us rather to discourage the use of this order than otherwise; it cannot be made so elegant an order as the Corinthian, and can only be wanted when columns are to be in two ranges ; and then the capital of the temple of A'esta, at Tivoli, affords a sufficient alteration of the Corinthian. Having ffone throno^h the forms and distinctions of the orders, it is proper to say, that, even in Greece and Rome, we meet with specimens whose proportions and composition do not agree with any of them. These are comprised under the general name of Composed orders, and though some are beautiful as small works, scarcely any of the ancient ones are worthy of imitation in large buildings. Of these composed orders we have two examples in the Pantheon, one in the columns of an altar, and the other in the pilasters of the attic : they have both dentil cornices, with an uncut face ; the first has angular Corinthian volutes, and none in the centres, and water leaves instead of raffled leaves under the volutes ; the other has no real volutes, but a scroll- work gives the appearance of them, and this capital is only fitted for pilasters. JNIodern composition has run very wild, and produced scarcely any thing worth prolonging by description. There was, however, one attempt of a singular kind, made some years since by an architect at ^^^indsor, who published a magnificent treatise, and executed one colonnade and a few door- cases in and near Windsor. This was H. Emlyn, who conducted the restoration of St. George's chapel. His order, he says, was first brought into his mind by the twin trees in AVindsor forest. He makes an oval shaft rise about one-foiu'th of its height, and then two round shafts spring from it, close to each other, and the diminution affords space for two capitals, which have volutes, and instead of leaves, feathers like the caps of the knights of the garter. His entablature has triglyphs, and his cornice mutules. The triglyphs are ostrich feathers, the guttse acorns, and the metopes are filled with the star of the garter. To conceal the awkward junction of the two columns to the lower part, an ornament is placed there, which is a trophy with the star of the garter in the centre. It is obvious that this order must be extremely unmanageable, as it is difficult, and indeed almost impossible to make a good angle column, and if its entablature is proportioned to the diameter of one column, it will be too small ; if to the whole diameter it will be too heavy, and a mean will give the capitals wrong; so that in any shape some error arises. In the colonnade above mentioned, the entablature is so light as to appear preposterous. This attempt is not generally known, as the book was very expensive, and the colonnade at a distance from a public road ; but it deserves consideration, because, though the idea was new, its execution seems completely to have failed, and indeed in large designs, no composed order has ever yet appeared that can come into competition with a scrupulous attention to those excellent models of Greece and Rome, now, through the effects of graphic art, happily so familar to almost every English architect. There are a few small buildings in and near Athens, Avhich, though not coming within any of the orders precisely, are yet so beautiful in some of their parts, as to require express notice. These are. The Choragic monument of Thrasyllus, D 34 The octagon tower of Andronicus Cyrrhestes, called the temple of the Winds, The Choragic monument of Lysicrates, called the lantern of Demosthenes, and The temple of Pandrosus. The first is now merely a face, its intervals being walled up, but was originally the front of a cavern, and consists of an entablature supported by three an tee, and covered by an attic lowered in the middle, on which is a statue in a sitting posture. The mould- ings of the ant® are such as are used in Doric buildings, and the architrave is capped by a plain fillet, with a small fillet, and guttse below; the guttle are continued along with an interval about equal to each drop. The frieze contains eleven wTeaths of laurel, and the cornice and attic mouldings are plain but very good. The whole of this monument is so simple, yet possesses so beautiful a character as to render it worthy of very attentive study. The temple of the AVinds is chiefly valuable for its sculpture; it had two door-ways of a composed order, and in the interior is a small order of a Doric, of very inferior proportions, which rises to the support of the roof from a plain string, below which are two cornices or rather tablets. The roof is of marble cut into the appearance of tiles. The outside walls are plain, with an entablature, and a string below, foraiing a sort of frieze, on which are the figures of the winds. On the whole, this monument is rather curious than beautiful. The lantern of Demosthenes. This is one of the most beautiful little remains of antiquity existing. The whole height is but thirty-four feet, and its diameter eight feet. It is a circular temple, with six engaged columns standing on a basement, nearly as high as the columns, and nearly solid. The capitals, though not like most Corinthian capitals, are very beautiful. The frieze is sculptured, and instead of a 36 cymatium to the cornice, is an ornament of honey- suckles, and above that on the roof, which is beautifully carved in leaves, is a line of a waved projecting ornament ; on the top is a vase, or rather the base of a tripod. Our limits will not admit of particularising all the singularities of this delicate building, but it well deserves study and imitation. The temple of Pandrosus is a building with Cary- atid^e, or figures instead of columns ; they have each a capital of an ornamented square abacus, and ovolo carved. The entablature has no frieze, but an archi- trave of three faces, the uppermost of which has plain circles for ornament, and joins the cornice, which is a dentil cornice, large, and of good mouldings. The statues are good, and stand upon a continued pedestal of two-thirds their own height; and there are two antee which descend through the pedestal, and the entablature is rather proportioned to these antas than the Caryatidas. JNIany of the mouldings are enriched, and indeed the whole of this curious building, which comprises the temples of Eryctheus, Minerva Polias, and Pandrosus, is a fi'uitful source of most delicate enrichment. In this essay it has by no means been intended to mention every valuable remaining example ; all that has been aimed at, is to give a general view of those remains which must be considered as standards, and to excite in the pupil that persevering attention to the best models, which is the only way of arriving at a complete knowledge of these very interesting sources of architectural science. 3C Description of the Plates of Grecian Architecture. PLATE I. The Tuscan order without a pedestal, having all its parts, and their members divided, with the names. The various kinds of what are usually considered simple mouldings, with their names, and a portion of an arch with an architrave springing from an impost. PLATE II. Outlines of the Grecian Doric, Ionic and Corin- thian. The Grecian Doric nearly accords with the best Athenian examples, but on this scale the minute parts cannot be shown of their exact size, particularly the fillets of the capital. The Ionic Order is that of the Ionic Temple on the Ilyssus, but not allowing the introduction of some delicate ornaments. The Corinthian is from perhaps the only really Greek Corinthian capital remaining, that of the Choragic monument of Lysicrates, or Lantern of De- mosthenes, with the crowning ornament peculiar to it PLATE III. This plate exhibits tlie whole five orders as generally worked by the Romans and Italians. In the Tuscan there is a slight variation from the example in plate 1. The Doric is the order as worked by Palladio and most of the Italian architects, and which has been much used in England, though there is no one ancient Roman example exactly like it. The same remark ap- plies to the Ionic order as here given : there being no ancient Roman remain that is not somewhat different. The Composite capital is shewn as in ancient Roman examples; likewise the entablature, which differs in some points from the Composite entablature commonly used in England, and which was so at Rome with Corinthian capitals. The Corinthian here given is from that best of Roman examples, the three columns considered the remains of the Temple of Jupitor Stator, omitting, of necessity, various minute and delicate carved ornaments. .. JPiiiti CjrmaJSfetd Corona ■ Ovoio Fnexe J'on.TKl/ :« JLtnver-pAcia. ' Ovolo Ifeck J'ill.ti.i.. J'UnfA r 7^ OlcIo Cavrtro Torn y J Mpophyy^^ f _A.^tra.ga i ~~3 / 2iead \ ) Cyma.£.ectrt J Cym ajitvtran ^ Quirked Ogee J Q'iirkecf Oyolo J ^cot^a (^ Imtio.ti, r.^,\~^r, -^o^. innL ^. [^ f I i^- ^' L Ml-4| f^ ^ """ ' i^. ' '^"^ 37 ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE. In a work like the present, there will be little propriety in a lengthened disquisition on the origin of this mode of building; we shall therefore proceed to the detail of those distinctions, which, being once laid down with precision, will enable persons of common observation to distinguish the difference of age and style in these buildings, as easily as the distinctions of the Grecian and Roman orders. It may, however, be proper here to offer a few remarks on the use of the term English, as applied to that mode of building usually called the Gothic, and by some the pointed architecture. Although, perhaps, it might not be so difficult as it has been supposed to be, to show that the EngHsh architects were, in many instances, prior to their continental neighbours, in those advances of the styles about which so much has been written, and so little concluded; it is not on that ground the term is now used, but because, as far as the author has been able to collect from plates, and many friends who have visited the Continent, in the edifices there, (more especially in those parts which have not been at any time under the power of England,) the architecture is of a very different cha- racter from that pure simplicity and boldness of composition which marks the English buildings. In every instance which has come under the author's notice, a mixture, more or less exact or remote, according to circumstances, of Italian composition, in some parts or other, is present ; and he has little doubt that a very attentive observation of the continental buildings called Gothic, would enable an architect to lay down the regulations of French, Flemish, Spanish, German, and Italian styles, which were in use at the time when the English flourished in England. On the origin of the pointed arch, about which, perhaps, there may be now more curiosity than ever. 38 from the numerous accounts given by travellers of apparently very ancient pointed arches in Asia, Africa, and various parts of the Continent ; it will, doubtless, be expected that something should be said ; and what is necessary may be said in a few lines. To say nothing on the impossibility, as flir as at present appears, of fixing an authentic date to those, which if dated, might be of the most importance, there appears little difficulty in solving the problem, if the practical part of building is considered at the same time with the theoretical. Intersecting arches were most likely an early, and certainly a very widely-spread mode of embellishing Norman buildings, and some of them were constructed in places, and with stones, requiring centres to turn them on, and the construction of these centres must have been by something equivalent to compasses: thus, even supposing (which could hardly have been the case) that the arches were constructed without a previous delineation, the centres would have led to the construction of the pointed arch ; and when once formed, its superior hghtness and applicability would be easily observed. To this remark it may be added, that the arches necessarily arising in some parts from Norman groining would be pointed. — A careful examination of a great number of Norman buildings will also lead to this conclusion — that the style was constantly assuming a lighter character, and that the gradation is so gentle into Early English, that it is difficult, in some buildings, to class them, so much have they of both styles : the same may be said of every advance; and this seems to be a convincing proof that the styles were the product of the gradual operations of a general improvement, guided by the hand of genius, and not a foreign importation. During the eighteenth century, various attempts, under the name of Gothic, have arisen in repairs and rebuilding ecclesiastical edifices, but these have been little more than making clustered columns and pointed windows, every real principle of English architecture 39 being, by the builders, either unknown or totally neglected. English architecture, may be divided into four dis- tinct periods, or styles, which may be named, 1st, the Norman style, 2nd, the Early English style, 3rd, the Decorated English style, and 4th, the Perpendicular English style. The dates of these styles we shall state hereafter, and it may be proper to notice, that the clear distinc- tions are now almost entirely confined to churches ; for the destruction and alteration of castellated buildings have been so great, from the changes in the modes of warfare, &c. that, in them, we can scarcely determine what is original and what addition. Before we treat of the styles separately, it will be necessary to explain a few terms which are employed in describing the churches and other buildings which exemplify them. Most of the ancient ecclesiastical edifices, when considered complete, were built in the form of a cross, with a tower, lantern, or spire erected at the intersec- tion. The interior space was usually thus divided: The space westward of the cross, is called the nave. The divisions outward of the piers, are called aisles. The space eastward of the cross, is generally the choir. The part running north and south, is called the cross or transept. The choir is generally enclosed by a screen, on the western part of which is usually placed the organ. The choir, in cathedrals, does not generally extend to the eastern end of the building, but there is a space behind the altar, usually called the lachj chapel. The choir is only between the piers, and does not include the side aisles, which serve as passages to the lady chapel, altar, &:c. The transept has sometimes side aisles, which are often separated by screens for chapels. 40 Chapels are attached to all parts, and are frequently additions. The aisles of the nave are mostly open to it, and in cathedrals both are generally without pews. In churches not collegiate, the eastern space about the altar is called the chancel. To the sides are often attached small buildings over the doors, called porches, which have sometimes vestries, schools, &c. over them. The font is generally placed in the western part of the nave, but in small churches its situation is very various. In a few churches a building like a chapel has been erected over the font, or the font set in it. In large churches, the great doors are generally either at the west end, or at the end of the transepts, or both ; but in small churches, often at the sides. To most cathedrals are attached a chapter-house and cloisters, which are usually on the same side. The chapter-house is often multangular. The cloisters are generally a quadrangle, with an open space in the centre ; the side to which is a series of arches, originally often glazed, now mostly open. The other wall is generally one side of the church or other buildings, with which the cloisters communicate by various doors. The cloisters are usually arched over, and formed the principal communication between the different parts of the monastery, for most of the large cross churches have been monasteries. The lady chapel is not always at the east end of the choir; at Durham it is at the west end of the nave, at Ely on the north side. The choir sometimes advances westward of the cross, as at AVestminster. The walls in the interior, between the arches, are piers. Any building above the roof may be called a steeple. If it be square-topt, it is called a tower. A tower may be round, square, or multangular. The tower is often crowned with a spire, and some- 41 times with a short tower of light work, which is called a lantern. An opening into the tower, in the interior, above the roof, is also called a lantern. Towers, of great height in proportion to their diameter, are called turrets; these often contain stair- cases, and are sometimes crowned with small spires. Large towers have often turrets at their corners, and often one larger than the others, containing a staircase ; sometimes they have only that one. The projections at the corners, and between the windows, are called buttresses^ and the mouldings and slopes which divide them into stages, are called set-off's. The walls are crowned by a parapet, which is straight at the top, or a battlement which is indented ; both may be plain, or sunk pannelled, or pierced. In castellated work, the battlement sometimes pro- jects, with intervals for the purpose of discharging missiles on the heads of assailants; these openings are called machicolations. Arches are round, pointed, or mixed : A semi-circular arch has its centre in the same line with its spring. A segmental arch has its centre lower than the spring. A horse-shoe arch has its centre above the spring. Pointed arches are either equilateral — described from tw^o centres, which are the whole breadth of the arch from each other, and form the arch about an equilateral triangle; or drop arches, which have a radius shorter than the breadth of the arch, and are described about an obtuse-angled triangle; or lancet arches, which have a radius longer than the breadth of the arch, and are described about an acute-angled triangle. All these pointed arches may be of the nature of segmental arches, and have their centres below their spring. Mixed arches are of three centres, which look nearly like elliptical arches; or of four centi'es, commonly 42 called the Tudor arch; this is flat for its span, and has two of its centres in or near the spring, and the other two far below it. The ogee or contrasted arch has four centres ; two in or near the spring, and two above it and reversed. The spaces included between the arch and a square formed at the outside of it, are called spandrells, and are often ornamented . Windows are divided into lights by mullions. The ornaments of the divisions at the heads of windows, &c. are called tracery. Tracery is either Jioiving, where the lines branch out into the resem- blance of leaves arches, and other figures ; or perpendicidar, wliere the mullions are continued through in straight lines. The horizontal divisions of windows and pannelling, are called transoms. The parts of tracery are ornamented with small arches and points, which are called featherings or foliations, and the small arches cusps ; and according to the number in immediate connexion, they are called trefoils, qiiatrefoils, or cinqnefoils. The cusps are sometimes again feathered, and this is called double feathering. Tablets are small projecting mouldings, or strings, mostly horizontal. The tablet at the top, under the battlement, is called a cornice, and that at the bottom a basement, under which is generally a thicker wall. The tablet running round doors and windows, is called a dripstone, and if ornamented, a canopy. Bands are either small strings round shafts, or a horizontal line of square, round, or other pannels, used to ornament towers, spires, and other works. Niches are small arches, mostly sunk in the wall, often ornamented very richly with buttresses and canopies, and frequently containing statues. A corbel is an ornamented projection from the wall. 43 to support an arch, niche, beam, or other apparent weight, and is often a head or part of a figure. A pinnacle is a small spire, generally with four sides, and ornamented; it is usually placed on the tops of buttresses, both external and internal. The small bunches of foliage ornamenting canopies and pinnacles, are called crockets. The larger bunches on the top are called Jinials, and this term is sometimes applied to the whole pinnacle. The seats for the dean, canons, and other dignitaries, in the choirs of coUegiate churches, are called stalls. The bishop's seat is called his throne. The ornamented open work over the stalls, and in general any minute ornamental open work, is called tabernacle work. In some churches, not collegiate, there yet remains a screen, with a large projection at the top, between the nave and chancel, on which was anciently placed certain images ; this was called the rood loft. Near the entrance door is sometimes found a small niche, with a basin which held, in catholic times, their holy w^ater ; these are called stoups. Near the altar, or at least where an altar has once been placed, there is sometimes found another niche, distinguished from the stoup by having a small hole at the bottom to carry off water ; it is often double, with a place for the bread. On the south side, at the east end of some churches, are found stone stalls, either one, two, three, or some- times more, of which the uses have been much con- tested. Under several large churches, and some few small ones, are certain vaulted chapels, these are called crypts. In order to render the comparison of the different styles easy, we shall divide the description of each into the following sections : Doors, Windows, 44 Arches, Piers, Buttresses, Tablets, Niches, and ornamental arches, or pannels, Ornamental carvings. Steeples, and Battlements, roofs, fronts, and porches. We shall first give, at one view, the date of the styles, and then* most prominent distinctions, and then proceed to the particular sections as described above. 1st, the Norman style, which prevailed to the end of the reign of Henry II, in 1 189 ; distinguished by its arches being generally semi-circular ; though sometimes pointed, with bold and rude ornaments. This style seems to have commenced before the conquest, but we have no remains really known to be more than a very few years older. •2nd, the Early English style, reaching to the end of the reign of Edward I, in 1307 ; distinguished by pointed arches, and long narrow windows, without muUions; and a peculiar ornament, which, from its resemblance to the teeth of a shark, we shall hereafter call the toothed ornament. 3d, Decorated Enolisli, reaching to the end of the reign of Edward III, in 1377, and perhaps from ten to fifteen years longer. This style is distinguished by its large windows, which have pointed arches divided by mullions, and the tracery in flowing lines forming circles, arches, and other figures, not running perpen- dicularly; its ornaments numerous, and very delicately carved. Perpendicular English. This is the last style, and appears to have been in use, though much debased, even as far as to 1()30 or 1()40, biit only in additions. Probably the latest whole building is not later than Henry the VIII. The name clearly designates this style, for the mullions of the windows, and the ornamental pannellings, nm in perpendicular lines. 45 and form a complete distinction from the last style; and many buildings of this are so crowded with ornament, as to destroy the beauty of the design. The carvings are generally very delicately executed. It may be necessary to state, that though many writers speak of Saxon buildings, those which they describe as such, are either known to be Norman, or are so like them, that there is no real distinction. But it is most likely, that in some obscure country church, some real Saxon work of a much earlier date may exist ; hitherto, however, none has been ascertained to be of so great an age. Without venturing to fix a date to either, it will be proper here to mention two towers which have hitherto been very httle noticed, and yet are of very singular construction ; the first is, that of the old church, St. Peter's, at Barton, in Lincolnshire ; this is a short thick tower, with very thick walls, originally of three stages ; the two lower of which are ornamented by perpendicular stripes of stone, projecting from the face of the wall, and near the top of each stage break- ing into arches; the lower set of arches semi-circular, and the perpendicular lines springing from a stone set on the top of the arch ; the second set are straight- lined arches, and run up to a flat string or tablet, on which is the third plain stage, with only two small arches, (if so they may be called,) as in the second stage. On the top of these three stages is one evidently early Norman, ha\nng a regular double Norman win- dow in it, with a shaft and capital in the middle ; this stage being clearly Norman, it is evident, the substruc- ture must be of an earlier date; and in the second stage of the lower part is also a double window, with round arches, and divided by something (evidently original, for there are tv/o) exactly resembling a rude balustre ; all this arrangement is so different from Nonnan work, that there seems a probability it may be real Saxon; and it should be noted, that the other, or neiv church, St. Mary's, stands within 150 yards of 46 the old church, and is principally a Norman building, with an Early English tower, and a chancel of the same ; and a very early Decorated east window, which, of course, renders it necessar^'^ to go back to the con- quest at least, for the date of the old one. The other tower is that of Clapham church, in Bedfordshire ; and this is principally remarkable for the extreme simplicity and rudeness of its construction. It consists of a square tower, without buttress or tablet, about three squares high, with a rude round arch door, and above it two heights of small round arched windows ; above this part of the tower, with a plain set-off, inwards is a Norman portion, with a Norman window divided into two by a central shaft, plain, and of early character ; this part is surmounted by a cornice and battlement of later date. We shall now begin to trace the first or Norman style, and first of Norman Doors. There seems to have been a desire in the architects who succeeded the Normans, to preserve the doors of their predecessors, whence we have so many of these noble, though, in most cases, rude efforts of skill remaining. In many small churches, where all has been swept away, to make room for alterations, even in the perpendicular style, the Norman door has been suffered to remain. The arch is semi-circidar, and the mode of increasing their richness, was by increasing the number of bands of moulding, and, of course, the depth of the arch. Shafts are often used, but not always, and we find veiy frequently, in the same building, one door with shafts, and one without. When shafts are used, there is commonly an impost moulding above them, before the arch mouldings spring. These mouldings are generally much orna- mented, and the wave or zigzag ornament, in some of its diversities, is almost universal, as is a large round moulding, with heads on the outer edge, partly pro- 47 jecting over this moulding. There are also mouldings with a series of figures enclosed in a running orna- ment ; and at one church at York, these figures are the zodiacal signs. The exterior moulding often goes down no lower than the spring of the arch, thus form- ing an apparent dripstone, though it does not always project so as really to form one. The door is often square, and the interval to the arch filled with carvings. Amongst the great variety of these doors in excellent preservation, Iffley church, near Oxford, is perhaps the best specimen, as it contains three doors, all of which are different ; and the south door is nearly unique, from the flowers in its interior mouldings. South Ockenden church, in Essex, has also a door of uncommon beauty of design, and elegance of execution. Ely, Durham, Rochester, Worcester, and Lincoln cathedrals, have also fine Norman doors. In these doors, almost all the ornament is external, and the inside often quite plain. Almost every county in England contains many Norman doors ; they are very often the only part which patching and altering has left worth examining, and they are remarkably varied, scarcely any two being alike. In delicacy of execution, and intricacy of design, the College Gate, at Bristol, seems equal, if not superior, to most ; and indeed is so well worked, that some persons have been inclined to ascribe it to a later date ; but an attentive examination of many other Norman works will show designs as intricate, where there can be no doubt of the date. Norman Windows. The windows, in this style, are diminutive doors as to their ornaments, except that, in large buildings, shafts are more frequent, and often with plain mould- ings. The size of these windows is generally small, except in very large buildings; there are no muUions, but a double window divided by a shaft, is not 48 uncommon. In small rich churches, the exterior is often a series of arches, of which a few are pierced, as win- dows, and the others left blank. The arch is semicir- cular, and if the window is quite plain, has generally sloped sides, either inside or out, or both. The pro- portions of the Norman windows are generally those of a door, and very rarely exceed two squares in height of the exterior proportions, including the ornaments. The existing Norman windows are mostly in build- ings retaining still the entire character of that style; for in most they have been taken out, and others of later styles put in, as at Durham, and many other cathedrals. There are still remaining traces of a very few circu- lar windows of this style; the west window at Iffley was circular, but it has been taken out ; there is one in Canterbury cathedral, which seems to be Norman; and there is one undoubtedly Norman at Barfreston, rendered additionally singular by its being divided by grotesque heads, and something like muUions, though very rude, into eight parts. There seems to have been little if any attempt at feathering or foliating the heads of Norman doors or windows. Norman Arches. The early Norman arches are semi-circular, and in many instances this form of the arch seems to have continued to the latest date, even when some of the parts were (juite advanced into the next style; of this the Tern pie church is a curious instance; here are piers with some of the features of the next style, and also pointed arches with a range of intersecting arches, and over this, the old round-headed Norman window. But though the round arch thus continued to the very end of the style, the introduction of pointed arches must have been much earlier, for we find intersecting arches in buildings of the purest Norman, and whoever con- 49 structed them, constructed pointed arches ; but it appears as if the round and pointed arches were, for nearly a century, used indiscriminately, as was most consonant to the necessities of the work, or the builder's ideas. Kirkstall and Buildwas abbeys, have all their exterior roinid arches, but the nave has pointed arches in the interior. There are some Nor- man arches so near a semi-circle as to be only just perceptibly pointed, and with the rudely carved Norman ornaments. There are a few Norman arches of very curious shape, being more than a semi-circle, or what is called a horse-shoe, and in a few instances a double arch. These arches are sometimes plain, but are much oftener enriched with the zigzag, and other ornameiits peculiar to this style. Norman Piers. These are of four descriptions, 1st, The round massive columnar pier, which has sometimes a round, and sometimes a square capital ; they are generally plain, but sometimes ornamented with channels in various forms, some plain zigzag, some like network, and some spiral. They are sometimes met with but little more than two diameters high, and sometimes are six or seven. 2d, A multangular pier, much less massive, is some- times used, generally octagonal, and commonly with an arch more or less pointed. 3d, The common pier with shafts ; these have sometimes plain capitals, but are sometimes much ornamented with rude fohage, and occasionally animals. The shafts are mostly set in square recesses. 4th, A plain pier, with perfectly plain round arches, in two or three divisions. In some cases, the shafts are divided by bands, but the instances are not many. E 50 Norman Buttresses. These reqviire little description ; they are plain, broad faces, with but small projection, often only a few inches, and running up only to the cornice tablet, and there finishing under its projection. Sometimes they are finished with a plain slope, and in a few instances are composed of several shafts. Bands or tablets running; alona; the walls, often run round the buttresses. There are, however, in rich buildings, buttresses ornamented with shafts at the angles, and in addition to these shafts, small series of arches are sometimes used ; occasionally a second buttress, of less breadth, is placed on the outside of the broad flat one. Norman Tablets. In treating of tablets, that which is usually called the cornice, is of the fbst consideration; this is frequently only a plain face of parapet, of the same projection as the buttresses; but a row of blocks is often placed under it, sometimes plain, sometimes carved in grotesque heads, and in some instances the grotesque heads support small arches, when it is called a corbel table. A plain string is also sometimes used as a cornice. The next most important tablet is the dripstone, or outer moulding of windows and doors; this is some- times undistinguished, but oftener a square string, frequently continued liorizontally from one window to another, round the buttresses. The tablets, under windows, are generally plain slopes above or below a flat string. In the interior, and in some instances in the exterior, these are much carved in the various ornaments described hereafter. 51 Norman Niches, &c. These are a series of small arches with round and often with intersecting arches, sometimes without, but oftener with shafts. Some of these arches have their mouldings much ornamented. There are also other niches of various shapes over doors, in which are placed figures ; they are generally of small depth, and most of them retain the figures originally placed in them. Norman Ornaments. The ornaments of this style consist principally of the different kinds of carved mouldings surrounding doors and windows, and used as tablets. The first and most frequent of them, is the zigzag or chevron moulding, which is generally used in great profusion. The next most common on door mouldings, is the beak- head moulding, consisting of a hollow and a large round ; in the hollow are placed heads of beasts or birds, whose tongues or beaks encircle the round. After these come many varieties, almost every speci- men having some difference of composition ; a good collection of them may be seen in the Archseologia, and King's Munimenta Antiqua. The capitals of piers and shafts are often very rudely carved in various grotesque devices of animals and leaves, but in all the design is rude and the plants are unnatural. There is one moulding which deserves mention, from its almost constant occurrence, very nearly of the same pattern and proportions over every part of the kingdom; this is the moulding of the sqviare abacus, over the flowered or cut part of the capital ; it consists of a broad fillet and hollow, which are separated by a little sunk channel, and it is sometimes continued as a tablet along the walls. Norman Steeples. The Norman steeple was mostly a massive tower, seldom rising more than a square in height above the roof of the building to which it belonged, and often not so much. They are sometimes plain, but often ornamented by plain or intersecting arches, and have generally the flat buttress, but that of St. Alban's runs into a round turret at each corner of the upper stage, and at St. Peter's, Northampton, there is a singular buttress of three parts of circles, but its date is imcertain. The towers of Norwich and AVinchester cathedrals, and Tewksbury church, are very fine spe- cimens of the Norman tower. It does not seem likely that we have any Norman spires, but there are some turrets crowned with large pinnacles, which may be Norman — such is one at Cleve, in Gloucestershire, and one of the towers at the side of the west front of Rochester cathedral. Norman Battlements. From exposure to weather, and various accidents, we find very few roofs in their original state, and from the vicinity of the battlement we find this part also very often not original. It seems difficult to ascertain what the Norman battlement was, and there seems much reason to suppose it was only a plain parapet ; in some castellated Norman buildings, a parapet, with here and there a narrow interval cut in it, remains, and appears original ; and this, or the ])lain parapet, was most likely the ecclesiastical battlement. ISIany Norman buildings have battlements of much later date, or parapets evidently often repaired. 63 Norman Roofs. The Norman wooden roof was often open to the actual frame-timbers, as we see some remaining to this day, as at Rochester and Winchester; but at Peterborough is a real flat boarded cieling, which is in fine preservation, having lately been carefully repainted from the original. It consists of a sort of rude Mosaic, full of stiff lines ; and its general division is into lozenges, with flowers of Norman character, and the whole according in design with the ornaments of that style. This kind of roof, particularly when the exterior was covered with shingles, contributed much to spread those destructive fires we so frequently read of in the history of early churches. Of the Norman groined roof, we have veiy many fine examples, principally in the roofs of crypts, and in small churches ; they consist of cross springers, and sometimes, but not always, of a rib from pier to pier; they are sometimes plain, but oftener ornamented with ribs of a few bold mouldings, and sometimes with these mouldings enriched with zigzag and other carved work of this style. The ruins of Landisfarne, on the Northumberland coast, have long exhibited the great cross springer rib, over the intersection of the nave and transepts, remaining while the rest of the roof is destroyed. Norman Fronts. The greatest part of the Norman west fronts have been much changed by the introduction of windows of later date (mostly large perpendicular windows.) The ruins of Landisfarne, however, present us with one nearly perfect. This consists of a large door with a gallery or triforium over it, of which some of the arches have been pierced through for windows ; and above, one larger window. Rochester and Lincoln cathedrals, Castle Acre priory, and Tewksbury church. 54 all show what the Norman west fronts were, with the exception of the introduction of the large window. The east fronts much resembled the west, except the door ; and in small churches we have both east and west fronts perfect. Peterborough and Winchester cathedrals furnish fine examples (except the insertion of tracery to the windows) of transept ends ; these generally rose in three tiers of windows, and had a fine effect, both interiorly and exteriorly. There are a few large buildings, and many small ones, with semi- circular east ends; and of these, the east ends of Norwich and Peterborough cathedrals are the finest remaining, but in both, the windows are altered by the insertion of tracery, and in parts, of new windows. Norman Porches. There are many of these remaining to small churches ; they are generally shallow, and the mouldings of the outer gate are often richer than those of the inner. The general appearance of Norman buildings is bold and massive. A ery few large buildings remain without much alteration and mixture with other styles ; perhaps the nave at Peterborough and that of Roches- ter cathedrals, present as little mixture as any, though in these the windows have been altered ; but of smaller churches, Barfreston in Kent, Stewkley in Bucking- hamshire, and Adel in Yorkshire, have had very little alteration. Tickencote, in Rutland, till within a few years, was one of the most valuable remains in the kingdom ; but it has been rebuilt sufficiently near in its likeness to the original to deceive many, and . so far from it as to render it not a copy, but an imitation ; yet it is still curious, and the interior of the chancel is original. The interior arrangement of large Norman buildings is considerably varied : sometimes the large circular pier is used alone, as at Gloucester cathedral; sometimes mixed with the pier composed of shafts, as at Durham ; and sometimes of that pier 55 of shafts only, as at Peterborough, Norwich, &c. — The triforia are various; some, as at Southwell and Waltham abbey, a large arch quite open, but oftener broken by small shafts and arches, and the clerestory windows have often an arch on each side of the window, forming a second gallery; of these galleries, which are partly pierced, the tower of Norwich forms the best example. In many large churches we find the Norman work remaining only to the string running over the arches, and later work above that ; this is the case at Canterbury and Hereford. The arrangement at Oxford cathedral is curious, as under the great arches, springing from the piers, are other arches springing from corbels, and between these two are shafts and arches as ornaments, but not open as a gallery. In small churches the gallery is generally omitted. Of this style, it wdll be proper to remark two buildings that deserve attention ; the one for its sim- plicity and beauty of composition, the other from its being nearly unique, and being at the same time a very fine specimen of ornament. The first is the vestibule, or entrance to the chapter-house, at Bristol, and the other the staircase leading to the registry at Canterbury cathedral. With respect to ornaments, few surpass those of a ruined tower at Canterbury, generally called Ethelbert's, and those on the front of Castle Acre priory. Norman fronts are very numerous, perhaps as much so as Norman doors, and some are very curious from the rudeness and intricacy of the decorations. There are many fine Norman cas- tellated remains ; of these it may be enough to mention those of Rochester in Kent, Hedingham in Essex, Connisburgh in Yorkshire, and Guildford in Surrey. The transition from Norman to Early English w^as gradual, and it is sometimes very difficult to decide on the character of some remains ; in general, the square abacus to the capital is the best mark, for the arch is none, many pure Norman ^vorks having the pointed arch. The mouldings of later Norman work 50 approach very near to Early English. The Temple church, London, is one of those buildings which seems to belong as much to one style as the other; and two Lincolnshire buildings, not far distant from each other, show a curious crossing of the marks of these two styles : — one, the front of the hospital of St. Leonard, at Stamford, presents a semi-circular arch with pure Norman mouldings, but the shafts are in two rows, stand free, and have a round abacus of several mould- ings, which are quite Early English. The other, part of Ketton church, has the square Norman abacus and semi-circular arch with Norman mouldings, and another pointed one on the side ; but both these have a drip- stone filled with the toothed ornament, which also runs down by the shafts, which are banded and have an Early English base. iBt t\)t gecouD, or ISarlp IHugltsI) ^tple. Early English Doors. As the Norman doors may be said to be all of semi- circular arches, these may be said to be all pointed, at least all the exterior ornamented ones; for there are small interior doors of this style with flat tops, and the sides of the top supported by a quarter circle from each side. The large doors of this style are often double, the two being divided by either one shaft or several clustered, and a quatrefoil or other ornament over them. The recess of these doors is often as deep as the Norman, but the bands and shafts are more numerovis, being smaller ; and in the hollow mould- ings they are frequently enriched with the peculiar ornament of this style — a singular toothed projection, which, when well executed, has a fine effect. But although this ornament is often used, (and sometimes a still higher enriched moulding, or band of open-work 57 flowers,) there are many doors of this style perfectly plain ; of this kind the door of Christ church, Hants, is a fine specimen. The dripstone is generally clearly marked, and often small, and supported by a head. In many doors, a trefoil, and even cinquefoil feathering is used, the points of which generally finish with balls, roses, or some projecting ornament. The principal moulding of these doors has generally an equilateral arch, but from the depth and number of the mouldings, the exterior becomes often nearly a semi-circle. In interiors, and perhaps sometimes too in the exterior, there are instances of doors with a trefoil-headed arch. The shafts attached to these doors are generally round, but sometimes filleted, and they generally, but not always, stand quite free. They have a variety of capitals, many plain, but many with delicate leaves running up and curling round under the cap-moulding, often looking like Ionic volutes. The bases are various, but a plain round and fillet is often used, and the reversed ogee sometimes introduced. The most prevalent base, and what is used not only to shafts, but sometimes as a base tablet, is curious, from its hkeness to the Grecian attic base ; like that it consists of two rounds, with a hollow between, and that hollow is often deepened, so that if water gets into it the water remains, and it is almost the only instance of a mould- ing used in English work which will hold water, they being in general so constructed as entirely to free themselves of rain, and in a great measure of snow. All these mouldings are cut with great boldness, the hollows form fine deep shadows, and the rich bands of open-work leaves are as beautiful as those executed at any subsequent period, being sometimes entirely hollow, and having no support but the attachment at the sides, and the connexion of the leaves themselves. These doors are not so numerous as the Norman, yet many still remain in perfect preservation — York, Lincoln, Chichester, and Salisbury, have extremely 58 fine ones, and Beverley minster one, of which the mouldings are bolder than most others. The door of the transept at York, and those of the choir-screen at Lincoln, have bands of the richest execution, and there is a fine double door at St. Cross. Litchfield cathedral presents a door curious for its resemblance to some foreign cathedrals ; it is placed in a shallow porch formed in the thickness of the wall, the arch of which is richly feathered, and otherwise ornamented ; the interior aperture is divided into two doorways by a pier of shafts, and this pier, as well as the side piers of both the apertures, has a statue fixed against it, resting on a corbel, and crowned with a canopy. The recess is groined, and the whole is worked with great delicacy, and full of rich ornament ; the interior por- tion is in tolerable preservation, the exterior much decayed; the doors appear original, and are covered with beautiful ramifications of scroll-work, in iron. Indeed there are many wooden doors, both of this style and Norman, which seem to be of the same age as the stone- work. Early English Windows. These are, almost universally, long, narrow, and lancet-headed, generally without feathering, but in some instances trefoiled. A variety of appearance results from the combination of this single shape of window. At Salisbury, one of the earliest complete buildings remaining, there are combinations of two, three, five, and seven. Where there are two, there is often a trefoil or quatrefoil between the heads; and in large buildings, where there are three or more, the division is often so small that they seem to be the lights of a large window, but they are really separate windows, having their heads formed from individual centres, and in general separate dripstones. This is the case even at Westmin- ster, where they approach nearer to a division by 59 mullions, from having a small triangle pierced beside the quatrefoil, and a general dripstone over all. It appears that the double window, with a circle over it, sometimes pierced and sometimes not, began to be used early in the style, for we find it at Salisbury; and this continued the ornamented window till the latest period of the style ; it was indeed only making a double door into a window. In the more advanced period it was doubled into a four-light window — at Salisbury, in the cloisters and chapter-house ; and the east window of Lincoln cathedral is of eight lights, formed by doubling the four-light, still making the circle the ornament. This window is in fact a Deco- rated window, but together with the whole of that part of the choir is singularly and beautifully accom- modated to the style of the rest of the building. In small buildings, the windows are generally plain, with the slope of the opening considerable, and in some small chapels they are very narrow and long. In large buildings they are often ornamented with very long and slender shafts, which are frequently banded. Most of our cathedrals contain traces of windows of this character, but some, as at Durham, have tracery added since their original erection. Salisbury, Chi- chester, Lincoln, Beverley, and York, still remain pure and beautiful ; at York north transept are windows nearly fifty feet high, and about six or eight wide, which have a very fine effect. Although the architects of this style worked their ordinary windows thus plain, they bestowed much care on their circles. Beverley minster, York and Lincoln, have all circles of this style peculiarly fine; that of the south transept at York, usually called the marygold window, is extremely rich, but the tracery of the circles at West- minster is of a much later date. There is in all the long windows of this style, one almost universal distinction ; fi'om the straight side of the window opening, if a shaft is added, it is mostly insular, and has seldom any connexion with this side. 00 so as to break it into faces, though the shafts are inserted into the sides of the doors, so as to give great variety to the opening. At Westminster abbey, there are a series of win- dows above those of the aisles, which are formed in spherical equilateral triangles. Early English Arches. The window-arch of this style being generally a lancet arch, and some persons having considered the shape of the arch to be a very distinguishing feature of the different styles, it may be necessary in this place to say a few words on arches generally. If we examine with care the various remains of the different styles, we shall see no such constancy of arch as has been apprehended ; for there are composition lancet arches used both at Henry the VII. 's chapel AA^est- minster, and at Bath ; and there are flat segmental arches in the Early English part of York ; and upon the whole it will appear, that the architect was not confined to any particular description of arch. The only arch precisely attached to one period, is the four- centred arch, which does not appear in windows, &:c. if it does in composition, before the Pei'pendicular style. In large buildings, the nave arches of the Early English style were often lancet, but in some large and many small ones, they are flatter, some of one-third di'op, and perhaps even more, and sometimes pointed segmental. At Canterbury, in the choir, are some curious pointed horse-shoe arches, but these are not common. The architraves of the large arches of rich buildings are now beautifully moulded like the doors, with deep, hollow mouldings, often enriched with the toothed ornament. Of this description, York transepts, and the nave and transepts of Lincoln, are beautiful specimens ; Salisbury is worked plainer, but not less really beautiful, and AVestminster abbey is (the nave 61 at least) nearly plain, but with great boldness of moulding. The arches of the gallery in this style, are often with trefoiled heads, and the mouldings running round the trefoil, even to the dripstone ; Chester choir is a fine specimen, and there are some plain arches of this description in Winchester cathedral which are very beautiful. Early English Piers. Of the piers of large buildings of this style, there are two distinguishing marks ; first, the almost con- stant division, by one or more bands, of the shafts which compose them; and secondly, the arrangement of these shafts for the most part in a circle. In general they are few, sometimes only four, sometimes eight, set round a large circular one ; such are the piers of Salisbury and of Westminster abbey ; there are sometimes so many as nearly to hide the centre shaft, as at Lincoln and York ; but the circular arrange- ment is still preserved, and there are some few, as at the choir at Chester, which come very near the appearance of Decorated piers. Amongst other piers, one not very common deserves to be noticed; it is found at Beverley minster, and in a few other churches ; it consists of shafts, some of which are plain rounds, others filleted rounds, and some whose plan is a spherical triangle, with the edge outwards ; at Run- corn church, Cheshire, is a pier consisting of four of these triangular shafts, with a handsome flowered capital, which has altogether a very fine effect. The capitals of these shafts are various ; in many, perhaps the greater number of buildings, they are plain, consisting of a bell with a moulding under it, and a sort of capping, with more mouldings above, and these mouldings are often continued round the centre pier, so as to form a general capital. The dividing bands are formed of annulets and fillets, and 62 are often continued under windows, &c. as tablets, and are, like the capitals, sometimes continued round the centre shaft. Another and richer capital is some- times used, which has leaves like those in the capitals of the door shafts. This kind of capital is generally used where the shafts entirely encompass the centre one, as at York and Lincoln, and has a very fine effect, the leaves being generally extremely well executed. The bases used are frequently near approaches in contour to the Grecian attic base, but the reversed ogee is sometimes employed. There is another pier, in buildings that appear to be of this style, which is at times very confusing, as the same kind of pier seems to be used in small churches even to a s^ery late date ; this is the plain multangular (generally octagonal) pier, with a plain capital of a few very simple mouldings, and with a plain sloped arch. Piers of this description are very frequent, and it requires great nicety of observation and discrimina- tion to refer them to their proper date ; but a minute examination will often, by some small matter, detect their age, though it is impossible to describe the minutise without many figures. In general the capitals and bases will carry in their character sufficient marks to determine their date, except in the transition from Early English to Decorated. Early English Buttresses. These are of four descriptions : 1 st. A flat buttress is often used, but it is not always so broad as the Norman ; its tablets are more delicate, and it has often the small shaft at the angle like the Norman. 2nd. A buttress not so broad as the flat one, but nearly of the same projection as breadth, and carried up, sometimes with only one set-ofF, and sometimes without any, and these have often their edges chamfered from the window tablet. They sometimes have a shaft at 63 the corner, and in large rich buildings are occasionally pannelled. These buttresses have also, at times, much more projection than breadth, and are sometimes, as at Salisbury, filled with niches and other ornaments. 3d. A long slender buttress, of narrow face and great projection in few stages, is used in some towers, but is not very common. 4th. Towards the latter part of this style, the but- tress in stages was used, but it is not very common, and is sufficiently distinguished by its triangular head, the usual finish of this style, which can hardly be called a pinnacle, though sometimes it slopes off fi-om the front to a point. From the buttresses of the aisles to those of the nave, choir, &c. now began to be used the flying buttress, of which Salisbury and Chichester cathedrals present various fine examples. Early English Tablets. The cornice is sometimes rich in mouldiogs, and often with an upper slope, making the face of the parapet perpendicular to the wall below. There are cornices of this style still resembling the Norman projecting parapet, but they consist of several mould- ings. The hollow moulding of the cornice is generally plain, seldom containing flowers or carvings, except the toothed ornament, but under the mouldings there is often a series of small arches resembling the corbel table. The dripstone of this style is various, sometimes of several mouldings, sometimes only a round with a small hollow. It is, in the interior, occasionally ornamented with the toothed ornament, and with floM^ers. In some buildings, the dripstone is returned, and runs as a tablet along the walls. It is in general narrow, and supported by a corbel, either of a head or a flower. There are frequently, in large buildings, in the ornamented parts, bands of trefoils, quatrefoils, &c. some of them very rich. Although a 64 sort of straight canopy is used over some of the niches of this style, yet it does not appear to have been used over windows or doors. In some buildings where they are found, they appear to be additions. The tablets forming the base-mouldings are sometimes a mere slope ; at others, in large buildings, are of several sets of mouldings, each face projecting farther than the one above it ; but the reversed ogee is very seldom used, at least at large and singly. Early English Niches. The most important niches are those found in chancels, in the walls of the south side, and of which the uses do not yet appear to be decided. Of these there are many of all stages of Early English ; there are sometimes two, but oftener three, and they are generally sunk in the wall, and adapted for a seat ; the easternmost one is often higher in the seat than the others. They have sometimes a plain trefoil head, and are sometimes ornamented with shafts ; they are generally straight-sided. The statuary niches, and ornamented interior niches, mostly consist of a series of arches, some of them slope-sided, and some with a small but not very visible pedestal for the statue. They are often grouped two under one arch, with an ornamental opening between the small arches, and the large one like the double doors ; a straight-sided canopy is sometimes used, and a plain finial. These niches, except the chancel stalls, and the stoup and water-drain, are seldom single, except in buttresses, but mostly in ranges. Early English Ornaments. The first ornament to be described is that already noticed as the peculiar distinction of this style, to which it seems nearly, if not exclusively confined ; it is the regular progression from the Norman zigzag to 65 the delicate four-leaved flowers so common in Deco- rated English buildings. Like the zigzag, it is generally straight-sided, and not round like the leaves of a flower, though, at a distance in front, it looks much like a small flower. It is very difficult to describe it, and still more so to draw it accurately ; it may perhaps be understood by considering it a succes- sion of low, square, pierced pyramids, set on the edges of a hollow moulding. This ornament is used very profusely in the buildings of this style, in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire, and frequently in those of other counties. Another ornament, which, though not peculiar, in small works, to this style, was seldom but during its continuance practised to so large an extent ; this is the filling of the spaces above the choir-arches with squares, enclosing four-leaved flowers. This is done at West- minster, at Chichester, and in the screen at Lincoln, in all which the workmanship is extremely good, and it has a very rich effect. In many parts, as in the spandrels of door-arches, and other plain spaces, circles filled with trefoils and quatrefoils, with flowered points, are often introduced. These are of small depth, and are used in many build- ings very fi-eely. Sometimes instead of sunk pannels a sort of boss of leaves and flowers is used, of which there are some fine examples in the Early English part of York minster. In the early period of the style, crockets were not used, and the finial was a plain bunch of three or more leaves, or sometimes only a sort of knob ; but in small rich works, towards the end of the style, beautiful finials and crockets were introduced. Early English Steeples. The Norman towers were short and thick, the Early English rose to a much greater height, and on the tower they placed that beautiful addition the spire. m Some of our finest spires are of this age, and the proportions obsers^ed between the tower and spire, are generally very good. Chichester is clearly of this style, and Salisbury, though perhaps not erected till within the period of the Decorated style, is yet in its composition so completely of Pearly English character, that it should be considered as such, notwithstanding the date and the advance of its ornaments ; in beauty of proportion it is unrivalled. The towers of Lincoln and Litchfield, though perhaps not finished withiii the date of the style, are yet of its composition; the spires of Litchfield are of much later date. AVakefield steeple is finely proportioned, though plain, and it is singular for its machicolations in the top of the tower. The towers are flanked by octagonal turrets, square flat buttresses, or, in a few instances, with small long buttresses; and generally there is one large octagonal pinnacle at the corners, or a collection of small niches. When there is no parapet, the slope of the spire runs down to the edge of the wall of the tower, and finishes there with a tablet ; and there is a double slope to connect the corners with the intermediate faces. The spire is often ornamented by ribs at the angles, some- times with crockets on the ribs, and bands of squares filled with quatrefoils, &c. surrounding the spire at different heights. There are many good spires of this style in country churches. Early English Battlements. During nearly the whole of this style, the parapet, in many places plain, in others ornamented, continued to be used; at Salisbury it has a series of arches and pannels, and at I^incoln quatrefoils in sunk pannels. Perhaps some of the earliest battlement is that at the west end of Salisbury cathedral, plain, of nearly equal intervals, and with a plain capping moulding ; but it may be doubted if even this is original. In small ornamented works, of the latter part of this style, a small battlement of equal intervals occurs ()7 Early English Roofs. The roof of the nave of Salisbury cathedral presents the best specimen of Early English groined roof; it has cross springers, and the rib from pier to pier, but it has no nb running longitudinally or across at the point of the arches. Another description of groining, also pecuhar to Early English works, is one with an additional rib between the cross springer and the wall, and between the cross springer and the pier rib; this has a longitudinal and cross rib at the point of the arches, but it does not run to the wall, being stopt by the intermediate rib. The old groining, in a passage out of the cloisters, at Chester, is a very good speci- men of this roof. Another variety is found at Litchfield, where there is no pier rib, but the two intermediate ribs are brought nearer together, and the longitudinal rib runs between them. The rib mouldings of these groins are not very large, and consist of rounds and hollows, and often have the toothed ornament in them, and at Litchfield a sort of leaf. The bosses in these roofs are not many or very large, the intersections being frequently plain, but some of the bosses are very well worked. There do not appear to be any Early English wooden roofs which can clearly be distinguished to be such. Early English Fronts. There is, perhaps, a greater variety in the Early English fronts, than in those of any other style ; the west front of Salisbury is, no doubt, the finest ; but the transept ends of Salisbury, York, and Beverley, are very fine, and all different in composition. The ruins of Tynemouth priory, XaWe Crucis abbey, Byland abbey, and AA^hitby abbey, all exhibit the remains of excellent work. Of the smaller works the east end of the lady-chapel at Salisbury, the extreme 68 east end of Herefi^rcl cathedral, and the north transept of Hcadon church, near Hull, deserve attention. In general the west fronts and transept ends have a door, and one, tv.-o, three, or even four ranges of niches, windows, and arches oA^er them. The transepts of Westminster abbey are very fine, but much of the work is not original. The west front of IJncoln minster deserves minute examination for its details; the old Norman front is encompassed by Early English, the workmanship of which is very superior; and a large feathered circle over the great door is nearly unique, from the exquisite workmanship of its mould- ings, which consist of open-work bands of flowers. The west front of Peterborough cathedral is different from all the rest; it consists of three large arches, forming a sort of screen to the front. These arches have piers of many shafts, and fine architraves, and the o'ables enriched with much small work of circles and arches, and a profusion of the toothed ornament over the whole. Eaiily English Porches. Of these, which are in general larger than the Norman porches, it will be sufficient to mention two; one the north porch of Salisbury cathedral, and the other the south porch at Lincoln. The first is attached to the north side of the nave, of which it occupies one division, rising as high as the aisles; it consists of a noble plain arched entrance, over which are two double windows, close together, resting on a tablet ; and quite in the peak of the gable, two small niches close together restino; on another string. The interior is o-roined in two divisions, and its walls ornamented with simk pannelling. The porch at Lm- coln is placed in a singular situation, nmning westerly from the west side of the south transept. The lower part is a rich piece of groined work, with three entrances — north, south, and west, over which is a 69 small room ; the whole of this porch, both interior and exterior, is well worked, and richly ornamented. The general appearance of Early English building is magnificent, and rich rather from the number of parts than from its details. In those buildings where very long windows are used, there is a grandeur arising from the heiglit of the divisions ; in smaller buildings there is much simplicity of appearance, and there is a remarkable evenness in the value of the workmanship. There is much of the other styles which appears evidently to be the copy by an inferior hand of better workmanship elsewhere; this is remarkably the case in Perpendicular work, but is hardly any where to be found in Early English work, all appears well designed and carefully executed. Of this style we have the great advantage of one building remaining, worked in its best manner, of great size and in excellent preservation ; this is Salis- bury cathedral, and it gives a very high idea of the {-■reat improvement of this style on the Norm.an. j^Iagnificent without rudeness, and rich, though simple, it is one uniform whole. The west front is ornament- ed, but by no means loaded, and the appearance of the north side is perhaps equal to the side of any cathedral in England. The west front of Lincoln is fine, but the old Norman space is too visible not to break it into parts. Peterborough and Ely have perhaps the most ornamented fronts of this style. As interiors, after Salisbury, the transepts of York are perhaps the best specimens, though there are parts of many other buildings deserving much attention. In the interior arrangement of large buildings we find the triforium a very prominent feature; it is large in proportion to the work above and below it, and i« generally the most ornamented part of the work. In small churches the triforium is generally omitted. Among the greatest beauties of this style are some of the chapter-houses, of which Lincoln and Litchfield, both decagons, but of very different arrangement; 70 and those of Chester and Oxford, both parallelograms, deserve particular attention ; but that of Salisbury, a regular octagon, and of a character quite late in the style, is one of the most beautiful buildings remaining. Its composition is peculiarly elegant, and its execution not excelled by any. There appear to be fewer fonts of this style remain- ing than of any other, at least of such as can be clearly marked as belonging to the style. Not much has been done in either restoring or imitating this style; it is certainly not easy to do either well, but it deserves attention, as in many places it would be peculiarly appropriate, and perhaps is better fitted than any for small country churches. It may be w^orkcd almost entirely plain, yet if ornament is used, it should be well executed ; for the ornaments of this style are in general as well executed as any of later date, and the toothed ornament and hollow bands equal, in difficulty of execution, the most elaborate Perpendicular ornaments. If the transition from Norman to Early English was gradual, much more so was that from Early English to Decorated ; and we have several curious examples of this transition on a large scale. West- minster abbey, though carried on for a long time, appears to have been carefidly continued on the original design ; and except a very few parts, some of which are quite modern, may be considered good Early English throuii'hout: but in the cloisters there is much gradation. Ely cathedral presents Early English of several dates, from just clear of Xorman to almost Decorated character. The nave of Litchfield, though clearly Early English in composition, has the windows of the aisles as clearly Decorated. Perhaps the finest piece of accommodation between the styles is the lady- chapel at Lincoln, -which is evidently Decorated, but executed so as beautifully to harmonize with the work about it. 71 Early English staircases (except round ones in towers) are not common; it is proper therefore to remark a small one, of rich character, at Beverley min- ster ; it leads from the north aisle of the choir to some adjacent building, and consists of a series of arches rising each higher than the former, with elegant shafts and mouldings. There is another in the refectory (now a grammar-school) at Chester, leading up to a large niche or sort of pulpit, for the reader. In this style ought to be noticed those beautiful monuments of conjugal affection, the crosses of Queen Eleanor. Of these, three remain sufficiently perfect to be restored, if required, and to do which little would be wanted to two of them. One at Geddington in Northamptonshire, is comparatively plain, but those of Northampton and Waltham are peculiarly rich, and of elegant composition; there is enough of Early English character in them to mark their date, and enough of Decorated richness to entitle them to be ranked as buildings of that style; that of Northampton is the most perfect, but that at Waltham is, on the whole, the most beautiful in its details. There are few, if any, castellated remains in which this style can be clearly made out. ^'l%^-'"" TJiio!rm,an /e^- -Cit jS3 mi T PickyroanJ&M. ■^"^ " '^t^f^"?; '''i^^ /jT!: ■m% T.BAc/cmariJ9-j4. Ml. ^f^ r P-jfT-- -<^^% :^ Pl^^^.'- !'■ "^-1 "^' — ^ ■ ■ (H^^ rJijji- 1^^^^^ '"^ -<^;^S g l_lte= ^ >-^^■: ■■^:>H<>^. A.. ]|^ J'.JHiekTriat, 'S5f^ ▼ ^ 'P* TSicim-m 'i-',* 113 position or detail, some parts of considerable value ; sometimes it is only a part of the building referred to which is valuable ; and it should always be borne in mind, that the alterations which are continually taking place, may make some of the references incorrect. It is possible, that on the borders some churches may be placed in a wrong county, from the division not being well known. Description of the Plates of English Architecture. [No relative proportion has been preserved between the various subjects engraved on each plate, t being the forms which are to be considered, each of which is given of the size most convenient for the requisite clearness of delineation.] Plate IV. Plan of a cathedral, collegiate, or other church, in the form of a cross, with the usual additional buildings. It is not the plan of any particular building, but composed to introduce as many parts as it was "expedient to describe. The cross lines represent the groinings of the roof, which, in plans of English buildings, are usually laid down as seen looking upwards. a a. Towers at the west end. b b, Porches. c, The nave, d d, Side aisles of the nave. e. The cloisters, f. The library. g. The north transept, /i, The south transept. i i, The side aisles of the south transept. k k k. Chapels. /, Chapter-house, with passage from the cloisters. m. Central tower, cross, or lantern. n, Screen, over which is usually placed the organ. o. Choir, at the east end of which is generally the altar. p p. Side aisles of the choir, q. Lady Chapel. The small circles in several of the piers and walls, are stair- cases ; the steps could not be shown on so small a scale. The organ screen, and inclosure of the choir, are of a lighter tint than the walls, to show that they are not continued to the top of the arches ; against this inclosure are placed the stalls in a cathedral. The place of the bishop's throne varies, but it is generally on the south side, and the pulpit nearly opposite. 114 Plate V. The design, in the lower part of this plate, is intended to give a general view of various parts as usually defined ; and no let- ters of reference are employed, that the student may the more completely acquire the knowledge of parts bv mere description. It consists of a portion of wall, in which is a Perpendicular win- dow of three lights and a transom. The transom heads of the lights are cinquefoiled in an ogee arch, and the upper lights in a plain arch ; the secondary divisions above are trefoiled. This ^vindow has a dripstone with plain returns. There are three buttresses ; two are square-set corner buttresses, (one seen in front and one in flank ;) and one diagonal one, which is seen at its angle. These buttresses have each three stages, and three set-offs, and die under the cornice, which is flowered. The battlement is of equal intervals, and the capping runs only horizontally. Under the window is a tablet, which runs round the square buttresses, or stops against, or dies into, the diagonal one. The base consists of two tablets ; one an ogee and hollow, and the other a plain slope. This description ought to be so fully comprehended, that if measures were added, the student should be able to draw the design from the description, being furnished with sections, or some other mode of determining the mouldings. The upper lines of the plate contain various arches : a, The semi-circular arch, h. The segmental arch. c. The equilateral arch, d. The drop arch. e. The lancet arch. /, The horse-shoe arch, g. The ogee arch. A, The four-centred arch. Then follow foliations or featherings : i, A plain arch, trefoiled. k, A square quatrefoil pannel, double feathered. I, A square window-head, cinquefoiled. 7)1, A transom, with ogee-head to the light, cinquefoiled, and the spandrels trefoiled. n, A trefoiled circle : this is of Early English character, and the points flowered. o, A cinquefoiled circle, p, Plan of a plain Norman pier. q, A Norman pier with shafts. r, An Early English pier with a centre. s. An Early English pier from Salisbury. tf A Decorated English pier from Chester. ?/, A Decorated English pier from York. w,