447a Pugin, \ugusUis Wclbv. Conlrasts; Or, a Parallel between the X'ol.l. Edifices ot'the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries, and Similar Buikhngs ui th. Present Day; Showing the Present Decay of Taste. IV, 50pp. text, etched frontisp'ece and 15 etched plates. 4to. London. Printed for the Author. 1836. FIRST EDITION. Fowler 265. , thr hi.^ / of -' mal'iiui $275.00 Uhich Middeldorf CONTRASTS: OB, H parallel BETWEEN THE NOBLE EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES, AND CORRESPONDING BUILDINGS OF THE PRESENT DAY; SHEWING THE PRESENT DECAY OF TASTE, ^ccompamcb appropriate %txl By a. WELBY PUGIN, Architect. JOHN GRANT 31 GEORGE IV BRIDGE Digitized by tlie Internet Arcliive in 2013 littp://arcliive.org/cletails/contrastsorparalOOpugi THE (iEHY CENTER LIBSAfiY PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. The author gladly avails himself of the opportunity afforded him by the publica- tion of this edition, to enlarge the text, and correct some important errors which appeared in the original publication. When this work was first brought out, the very name of Christian art was almost unknown, nor had the admirable works of Montalembert and Rio appeared on the subject. It is not by any means sur- prising that the author, standing almost alone in the principles he was advocating, should have adopted some incorrect views in the investigation of a subject in- volved in so many perplexing difficulties : the theory he adopted was right in the main point, but indistinctly developed. He was perfectly correct in the abstract facts, that pointed architecture ivas produced hy the Catholic faith, and that it was destroyed in England by the ascendency of Protestantism ; but he was wrong in treating Protestantism as a primary cause, instead of being the ej^ect of some other more powerful agency, and in ascribing the highest state of architectural excellence to the ecclesiastical buildings erected immediately previous to the change of religion ; as, although immeasurably excelling the debased productions of the Elizabethan period, they still exhibited various symptoms of the decay of the true Christian principle. The real origin of both the revived Pagan and Protestant principles is to be traced to the decayed state of faith throughout Europe in the fifteenth century, which led men to dislike, and ultimately forsake, the principles and architecture which originated in the self-denying Catholic princip)le, and admire and ado2')t the luxurious styles of ancient Paganism. Religion must have been in a most diseased state, for those two monsters, revived Paganism and Protestantism, ever iv PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. to have obtained a footing, much less to have overrun the Christian world. We cannot imagine a St. Ambrose or St. Chrysostom setting up Bacchanalian groups and illustrations of Ovid's fables as decorations to their episcopal residences, nor a St. Bede or St. Cuthbert becoming Calvinists. If Henry VIII. exceeded Nero himself in tyranny and cruelty, had not the Catholic spirit been at an exceedingly low ebb, the Church of England, instead of succumbing, would have risen in glory and purity, for such has ever been the effect of persecution in the days of lively faith. But when the will of a schismatical king could so prevail with the whole clergy of this country, that they actually erased from their missal and breviaries the most glorious champion and martyr of the Church, St. Thomas of Canterbury, and even put out the commemoration of the holy father himself (only one bishop and a few abbots and priests being found true witnesses of the faith), it is evident that England's Church had miserably degenerated. The so-called Reformation is now regarded by many men of learning and of unprejudiced minds as a dreadful scourge, permitted by divine Providence in punishment for its decayed faith ; and those by whom it was carried on are now considered in the true light of Church plunderers and crafty political intriguers, instead of holy martyrs and modern apostles. It is, indeed, almost impossible for any sincere person to see all episcopal and ecclesiastical power completely con- trolled at the pleasure of a lay tribunal, without condemning the men who origin- ally betrayed the Church, and feeling that in our present divided and distracted state, consequent on the Reformation, we are suffering severely for the sins of our fathers. This is the only really consistent view which can be taken of the subject. England's Church was not attacked hy a strange enemy and overthrown, she was consumed hy internal decay ; her privileges and abbeys were surrendered by dissembling and compromising nominally Catholic ecclesiastics, and her revenues and her glorious ornaments were despoiled and appropriated by so-called Catholic nobles. Both Protestantism and revived Paganism were generated by unworthy men who bore the name of Catholic ; the former is, indeed, a consequence of the latter, as will be shown hereafter ; and, strange as it may appear, there is a great deal of connexion between the gardens of the Medici, filled with Pagan luxury, PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. V and the Independent preaching-houses that now deface the land ; for both are utterly oj^posed to true Catholic jyrinciples, and neither could have existed had not those principles decayed. When that great champion and martyr for the truth, Savonarola, the Dominican monk, preached his first sermon at Florence, he predicted the desolation about to fall on the Church ; and after . pourtraying, in the most powerful language, the terrible danger in the then new rage for classic and Pagan styles, that were beginning to usurp the place of Christian art and feeling, he exclaimed, " By your continued study of these things, and your neglect of the sublime truths of the Catholic faith, you will become ashamed of the cross of Christ, and imbibe the proud luxurious spirit and feelings of Paganism ; till, weak both in faith and good works, you will fall into heresies, or infidelity itself" Who cannot see this terrible prediction fulfilled in the desolating religious revolution of the sixteenth century, to which we owe the present divided state of religious parties in this country ? Having explained and rectified the errors into which he had fallen, the author is quite ready to maintain the principle of contrasting Catholic excellence with modern degeneracy ; and wherever that degeneracy is observable, be it in Pro- testant or Catholic countries, it will be found to proceed from the decay of true Catholic principles and practice. It may be proper to observe, that most of the reviewers of this work have fallen into a great error, by reproaching the author for selecting buildings of the modern style to contrast with the ancient edifices, when so many better build- ings had been erected during the last few years in imitation of the pointed style. This objection may be answered in a few words : revivals of ancient architecture, although erected in, are not buildings of, the nineteenth century, — their merit must be referred back to the period from whence they were copied ; the archi- tecture of the nineteenth century is that extraordinary conglomeration of classic and modern styles peculiar to the day, and of which we can find no example in any antecedent period. LIST OF PLATES. Engraved Title. Plate 1. Contrasted Altars. Woodcut. 2. ,, Residences for the Poor. 3. Selections from the Works of various celebrated British Architects. 4. Contrasted Royal Chapels. 5. „ Chapels. 6. „ Town Halls. 7. „ Episcopal Residences. 8. ., Public Inns. 9. A Catholic Town in 1440-1840. 10. Contrasted Public Conduits. 11. „ Crosses. 12. New Church — Open Competition. The Practice of Architecture in the 19th Century- Satirised. 13. Contrasted Altar Screens. 14. They are weighed in the Balance and found wanting. 15. Contrasted College Gateways. 16. ,, Sepulchral Monuments. 17. ,, Episcopal Monuments. 18. St. Mary Overies, Southwark — Old and New Western Doorways. 19. Contrasted Parochial Churches. 20. „ House Fronts (not in Book). CONTEASTS: OR, a parallel BETWEEN THE NOBLE EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES, AND SIMILAR BUILDINGS OF THE PRESENT DAY, cfec. cfec. (be. CHAPTER I. ON THE FEELINGS WHICH PRODUCED THE GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. On comparing the Architectural Works of the last three centuries with those of the Middle Ages, the wonderful superiority of the latter must strike every attentive observer ; and the mind is naturally led to reflect on the causes which have wrought this mighty change, and to en- deavour to trace the fall of Architectural taste, from the period of its first decline to the present day ; and this will form the subject of the following pages. It will be readily admitted, that the great test of Architectural beauty is the fitness of the design to the purpose for which it is intended, and that the style of a building should so correspond with its use that the spectator may at once perceive the purpose for which it was erected. b 2 GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. Acting on this principle, different nations have given birth to so many various styles of Architecture, each suited to their climate, customs, and religion ; and as it is among edifices of this latter class that we look for the most splendid and lasting monuments, there can be little doubt that the religious ideas and ceremonies of these different people had by far the greatest influence in the formation of their various styles of Architecture. The more closely we compare the temples of the Pagan nations with their religious rites and mythologies, the more shall we be satisfied with the truth of this assertion. In them every ornament, every detail had a mystical import. The pyramid and obelisk of Egyptian Architecture, its Lotus capitals, its gigantic sphinxes and multiplied hieroglyphics, were not mere fanciful Architectural combinations and ornaments, but emblems of the philo- sophy and mythology of that nation. In classic Architecture again, not only were the forms of the temples dedicated to different deities varied, but certain capitals and orders of Architecture were peculiar to each ; and the very foliage ornaments of the friezes were symbolic. The same principle, of Architecture resulting from religious belief, may be traced from the caverns of Elora, to the Druidical remains of Stonehenge and Avebury ; and in all these works of Pagan antiquity, we shall invariably find that both the plan and decoration of the building is mystical and emblematic. And is it to be supposed that Christianity alone, with its sublime truths, with its stupendous mysteries, should be deficient in this respect, and not possess a symbolical architecture for her temples which would embody her doctrines and instruct her children ? surely not, — nor is it so : from Christianit}^ has arisen an architecture so glorious, so sublime, so perfect, that all the productions of ancient paganism sink, when compared before it, to a level with the false and corrupt systems from which they originated. Pointed or Christian Architecture has far higher claims on our admi- ration than mere beauty or antiquity ; the former may be regarded as a matter of opinion, — the latter, in the abstract, is no proof of excellence, GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. 3 but in it alone we find the faith of CJiristianity embodied, and its prac- tices illustrated. The three great doctrines, of the redemption of man by the sacrifice of our Lord on the cross ; the three equal persons united in one Godhead ; and the resurrection of the dead, — are the foundation of Christian Architecture. The first — the cross — is not only the very plan and form of a Catholic church, but it terminates each spire and gable, and is imprinted as a seal of faith on the very furniture of the altar. The second is fully developed in the triangular form and arrangement of arches, tracery, and even subdivisions of the buildings themselves. The third is beautifully exemplified by great height and vertical lines, which have been considered by the Christians, from the earliest period, as the emblem of the resurrection. According to ancient tradition, the faithful prayed in a standing position, both on Sundays and during the pascal time, in allusion to this great mystery. This is mentioned by Tertullian and by St. Augustine. Stantes oramus, quod est signum resurrectionis ; and, by the last council of Nice, it was forbidden to kneel on Sundays, or from Easter to Pentecost. The vertical principle being an acknowledged emblem of the resurrection, w^e may readily account for the adoption of the pointed arch by the Christians, for the purpose of gaining greater height with a given width. I say adoption, because the mere form of the pointed arch is of great antiquity ; and Euclid himself must have been perfectly acquainted with it. But there was nothing to call it into use, till the vertical principle was established. The Christian churches had pre- viously been built with the view to internal height : triforia and clerestories existed in the Saxon churches. But lofty as were these buildings, when com23ared with the flat and depressed temples of classic antiquity, still the introduction of the pointed arch* enabled the builders to obtain nearly double the elevation with the same width, as * We may consider the introduction of the depressed or four-centred arch as the first symptom of the dechne of Christian Architecture, the leading character of which was the vertical or pointed principle. 4 GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. is clearly seen in the annexed cut. But do not all the features and details of the churches erected during the Middle Ages, set forth their origin, and, at the same time, exhibit the triumphs of Christian truth? Like the religion itself, their founda- tions are in the cross, and they rise from it in majesty and glory. The lofty nave and choir, with still loftier towers, crowned by clusters of pinnacles and spires, all directed towards heaven, beautiful emblems of the Christian's brightest hope, the shame of the Pagan ; the cross, raised on high in glory, — a token of mercy and forgiveness, — crowning the sacred edifice, and placed between the anger of God and the sins of the city. The images of holy martyrs, each bearing the instrument of the cruel death by which Pagan foolishness hoped to exterminate, with their lives, the truths they witnessed, fill every niche that line the arched recesses of the doorways. Above them are forms of cherubims and the heavenly host, mingled with patriarchs and prophets. Over the great entrance, is the dome or final judgment, the divine majesty, the joys of the blessed spirits, the despair of the condemned. What subjects for contemplation do not these majestic portals present to the Christian, as he approaches the house of prayer ! and well are they calculated to awaken those sentiments of reverence and devotion, suited to the holy place. But if the GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. 5 exterior of the temple be so soul-stirring, what a burst of glory meets the eye, on entering a long majestic line of pillars rising into lofty and fretted vaulting ! The eye is lost in the intricacies of the aisles and lateral chapels ; each window beams with sacred instructions, and sparkles with glowing and sacred tints ; the pavement is a rich enamel, interspersed with brass memorials of departed souls. Every capital and base are fashioned to represent some holy mystery ; the great rood loft, with its lights and images, through the centre arch of which, in distant perspective, may be seen the high altar blazing with gold and jewels, surmounted by a golden dove, the earthly tabernacle of the Highest; before which, burn three unextinguished lamps. It is, indeed, a sacred place ; the modulated light, the gleaming tapers, the tombs of the faithful, the various altars, the venerable images of the just, — all conspire to fill the mind with veneration, and to impress it with the sublimity of Christian worship. And when the deep intona- tions of the bells from the lofty campaniles, which summon the people to the house of prayer, have ceased, and the solemn chant of the choir swells through the vast edifice, — cold, indeed, must be the heart of that man who does not cry out with the Psalmist, laowtne tiiUvi trecorem Jjomus tuae, tt locum i^atiitattoms gloriac tuae. Such efi'ects as these can only be produced on the mind by build- ings, the composition of which has emanated from men who were thoroughly embued with devotion for, and faith in, the religion for whose worship they were erected. Their whole energies were directed towards attaining excellence ; they were actuated by far nobler motives than the hopes of pecuniary reward, or even the applause and admiration of mankind. They felt they were engaged in one of the most glorious occupations that can fall to the lot of man — that of raising a temple to the worship of the true and living God. It was this feeling that operated alike on the master-mind that planned the edifice, and on the patient sculptor whose chisel wrought each varied and beautiful detail. It was this feeling that enabled the ancient masons, in spite of labour, danger, and difficulties, to 6 GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. persevere till they had raised their gigantic spires into the very regions of the clouds. It was this feeling that induced the ecclesiastics of old to devote their revenues to this pious purpose, and to labour with their own hands in the accomplishment of the work ; and it is a feeling that may be traced throughout the whole of the numerous edifices of the Middle Ages, and which, amidst the great variety of genius which their varied decorations display, still bespeaks the unity of purpose which influenced their builders and artists. They borrowed their ideas from no heathen rites, nor sought for decorations from the idolatrous emblems of a strange people. The foundation and progress of the Christian faith, and the sacraments and ceremonies of the Church, formed an ample and noble field for the exercise of their talents ; and it is an incontrovertible fact, that every class of artists, who flourished during those glorious periods, selected their subjects from this inexhaustible source, and devoted their greatest ejfforts towards the embellishment of ecclesiastical edifices. Yes, it was, indeed, the faith, the zeal, and above all, the unity of our ancestors, that enabled them to conceive and raise those wonder- ful fabrics that still remain to excite our wonder and admiration. They were erected for the most solemn rites of Christian worship, Avhen the term Christian had but one signification throughout the world ; when the glory of the house of God formed an important con- sideration with mankind, when men were zealous for religion, liberal in their gifts, and devoted to her cause. I am well aware that modern writers have attributed the numerous churches erected during the Middle Ages to the effect of superstition. But if we believe the great principle of Christian truth, that this life is merely a preparation for a future state, and that the most important occupation of man in this world is to prepare for the next, the multiplicity of religious estab- lishments during the ages of faith, may be accounted for on far nobler motives than have been generally ascribed to them. It may be objected, and with some apparent reason, that if pointed Architecture had been the result of Christian faith, it would have been GREAT EDIFICES OF THE MIDDLE AGES. 7 introduced earlier. But if we examine the history of the Church, we shall find that the long period which intervened between the establish- ment of Christianity and the full development of Christian art, can be most satisfactorily accounted for. When the Catholic faith was first preached, all art was devoted to the service of error and impurity. Then the great and terrible persecutions of the first centuries, utterly pre- €luded its exercise among the early Christians. The convulsion consequent on the overthrow of the Roman empire, which destroyed, for a time, all the practical resources of art, was a sufficient cause for the barbarous state of Architecture at that period : but when Christianity had overspread the whole of western Europe, and infused her salutary and ennobling influence in the hearts of the converted nations, art arose purified and glorious ; and as it had been previously devoted to the gratification of the senses, then it administered to the soul : and exalted by the grandeur of the Christian mysteries, ennobled by its sublime virtues, it reached a point of excellence far beyond any it had previously attained ; and instead of being confined to what was sensual or human, it was devoted to the spiritual and divine. Christian art was the natural result of the progress of Catholic feeling and devotion ; and its decay was consequent on that of the faith itself; and all revived classic buildings, whether erected in Catholic or Protestant countries, ace evidences of a lamentable departure from true Catholic principles and feelings, as will be shown in the ensuing chapter. CHAPTER II. ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. " The ancient Pagans were at least consistent ; in their architecture, symbols, and sculpture,, they faithfully embodied the errors of their mythology ; but modern Catholics have revived these profanities in opposition to reason, and formed the types of their churches, their paint- ings, their images, from the detestable models of pagan error which had been overthrown by the triumph of Christian truth, raising temples to the crucified Redeemer in imitation of the Parthenon and Pantheon ; representing the Eternal Father under the semblance of Jupiter ; the blessed Virgin as a draped Venus or Juno ; martyrs as gladiators ; saints as amorous nymphs; and angels in the form of Cupids." — Translated from De FEtat Actuel de FAii Relig^ieux en France, par M. le Comte de Montalembert. Paris, 1839. Did not almost every edifice erected during the last few centuries attest the fact, it would hardly be believed, that after Christianity had utterly overthrown the productions of Paganism, with its false doctrines, and when a new and sublime style of art had been generated by its holy and ennobling influence (in all respects suited to its faith and discipline), its professors in future ages would have abandoned this glorious achievement of their religion, to return to the corrupt ideas of pagan sensuality which their ancestors in the faith had so triumphantly suppressed, and, horrible profanation ! turn the most sacred mysteries of Christianity into a mere vehicle for their revival.* But every church that has been * Almost all the celebrated artists of the last three centuries, instead of producing their works from feelings of devotion and a desire of instructing the faithful, merely sought for a display of their art and the increase of fame ; hence they not unfrequently selected the least edifying subjects from sacred writ, such as Lot and his daughters, the chastity of Joseph, Susanna and the elders, and many others of the same description, simply because they afforded a better scope for the introduction of pagan nudities ; even St. Sebastian was more frequently depicted from this motive, than from any veneration for the constancy of that holy martyr. And what greater profanation could be conceived, than making the representations of the most holy personages mere vehicles for portraits of often very unworthy living characters, who had the audacity to be depicted as saints, apostles, and even as our blessed Lady and the divine Redeemer himself — a detestable practice, of which we have but too many instances, and which ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. 9 erected from St. Peter's at Rome* downwards, are so many striking examples of the departure from pure Christian ideas and Architecture; and not only have the modern churchmen adopted the debased style in all their new erections, but they have scarcely left one of the glorious fabrics of antiquity unencumbered by their unsightly and incongruous additions. This mania for paganism is developed in all classes of buildings erected since the fifteenth century — in palaces, in mansions, in private houses, in public erections, in monuments for the dead ; it even extended to furniture and domestic ornaments for the table : and were it not beyond the limits of my subject, I could show form strikingly contrasts to the humble piety of the ages of faith, when the donors of sacred pictures were figured kneeling in a corner of the subject in the attitude of prayer, with their patron saints behind them, and not unfrequently labels with pious inscriptions proceeding from their mouths. * It is surprising how this edifice is popularly regarded as the ne phis ultra of a Catholic church, although as a Christian edifice it is by no means comparable to either St. Peter's of York or St. Peter s of Westminster, in both of which churches every original detail and emblem is of the purest Christian design, and not one arrcvigement or feature horroioed from pagan antiquity ; and although these glorious piles have been woefully desecrated and shorn of more than half their original beauty, they yet produce stronger feelings of religious awe than their namesake at Rome, still in the zenith of its glory, with all its mosaics, gilding, and marbles. As an English author justly remarks, above thirty millions of Catholic money, gathered for the most part in the pointed cathedrals of' Christendom, have been lavished in the attempt to adapt classic details to a Christian church, the very idea of which implied a most degenerate spirit. St. Peter's, like other buildings of the same date and style, must convey to every Catholic mind the most melancholy associations, — it marks the fatal period of the great schism, and the outbreak of fearful heresy. England — once the brightest jewel in the crown of the Church — separated from Catholic unity ; her most glorious churches dismantled, her religious dispersed, and clergy brought into bondage. France — the kingdom of the saintly Louis — overrun with Calvinists; her cathedrals pillaged, her abbeys given into the hands of lay rapacity, and the first seeds of the terrible revolution disseminated. Germany, Sweden, Holland, and a great part of the Low Countries, the same. For one religious house founded since that fatal period, five hundred have been dismantled and suppressed; for one canonized saint, we find a thousand professed infidels; for one country converted, six lost. These are some of the accompaniments of the grand renaissance, or revival of classic art, which moderns so highly extol in preference to the glorious works produced by the faith, zeal, and devotion of the Middle Ages; and such have been the results of the revived pagan system, which began with the classicism of the sixteenth century, was fostered in the mythological palaces of the Grand Monarque, and only attained its climax in the great French revolution, when its principles were fully worked out in the massacre of the clergy, the open profession of infidelity, and the exhibition of a prostitute raised over the altar of God. C 10 ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. that it has invaded the ordinary forms of speech, and is discernible in modern manners and government. The most celebrated palaces of Europe are the veriest heathen buildings imaginable ; in Versailles, the Tuileries, Louvre, St. Cloud, Fontainebleau, Brussels, Munich, Buckingham Palace, in vain we look for one Christian emblem or ornament. The decoration of garden, terrace, entrance hall, vestibule, gallery, or chamber, ceiling, panel, wall, window, or pediment, is invariably designed from heathen myth- ology. Gods and goddesses, demons and nymphs, tritons and cupids, repeated ad nauseam,, all represented in most complimentary attitudes, with reference to the modern pagan for whom the sycophant artists designed the luxurious residence. In new Buckingham Palace, whose marble gate cost an amount which would have erected a splendid church, there is not even a regular chapel provided for the divine office ; so that both in appearance and arrangement it is utterly unsuited for -a Christian residence, and forms a most lamentable and degenerate contrast with the ancient Palace of Westminster, of which the present unrivalled Hall was the hospitable refectory, and the ex- quisitely-beautiful St. Stephen's the domestic chapel.* That was, indeed, a noble structure, worthy of the English monarchs, every chamber of which was adorned with emblems of their faith and their €0U7itTy. Conspicuous above the rest were depicted St. George and St. Edward, whose names in moments of desperate peril have oft animated the English in sustaining many an unequal tight * Few persons are a\\"are of the riehiiess of this once <>lorioiis diapel, which nuist have surpassed in splendour any existin<); nioiuinient of pointed art; the whole of the intei'nal archi- tectuie was covered with excpiisite paintings and diapering. The Society of Anti((uaries have engra\e(l portions of them ; in IJritton's Hi.stor// of J nh'ifccfitrc, \hv lower compartments are faithfully figured. -John Carter has etched sections of the chapel in his J>inciit A nhita tmr, but his restora- tion of the loof is incorrect, although, in other respects, the plates give a tolerable idea of this wonderful building. Its great beauties, however, found no favour in the eyes of the semi- barbarians of modern times, who fitted it up for the House of Commons in a style not dissimilar to a methodist conventicle. Still fragments of the ancient elaborate enrichments were to i)e traced behind the unsightly additions till the great lire utterly destroyed them, liritton and IJrayleyV A iifiqinfics of the Old Paldcc at ]Vc.sturn,.stf>\ contains many interesting views of this buiiding as it appeared aftei' the conHagration. ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. 11 with foreign foes. But these saintly names, so famous in our national annals, and the very mention of which wrought such wonders in time of old, have no charm for modern eais. In lieu of their venerable images, we have now a pagan Victory or a Minerva, while the standard of England is hoisted on a scalfold-pole, stuck above a mass of soot-stained marble, miscalled a triumphal arch, and a sorry sub- stitute for the turreted gateways of the ancient palace. It is very curious to observe the extraordinary change in the decoration of timber houses in the French cities that took place in the short interval between the reigns of Charles VIII and Francis I. Previous to, and during the reign of the former, and even under Louis XII, all the ornaments on private houses were of a devotional and Christian character. The Annunciation of our blessed Lady was frequently carved over entrance doors ; saints in canopied niches formed the invariable enrichments of corbels and stauncheons ; fre- quently pious inscriptions were cut on scrolls running on beams and brestsummers, or extended by angels : every detail had a devout aiid Catholic signification. But no sooner had the principles of modern paganism been introduced, than these holy subjects were discon- tinued : the fables of Ovid, classic heroes, the twelve Caesars, and similar representations, were substituted in their place. While Catholic faith and feelings were unimpaired, its results were pre- cisely the same in different countries. There is scarcely any percep- tible difference between the sepulchral monuments of the old English ecclesiastics or those of the ancient Roman churchmen ; * we find * It is quite a mistake to suppose that Christian or pointed architecture was not fully developed in Italy, as in other countries, during the ages of faith. Formerly there w ere most numerous examples to be found ; but as it has been the fountain-head of the Pagan revival, few of these monuments of ancient piety have escaped uninjured, while manv have been totally destroyed. At Assisiuni there are several beautiful pointed churches, and one, triply-divided, of unrivalled design and execution, the vaults and walls being covered with frescoes in the finest style of Christian art. The ciboriums or canopies over the high altars of the basilicas, were alj in the pointed style. The church ornaments used in the ancient basilica of St. Peter's, of which a few are to be found in the Vatican collection, are exquisitely beautiful, and precisely of the samej'orm and design as those which belonged to the old English cathedrals at that period. Had not the heads of the Catholic Church resided so long at Avignon, Rome would have possessed a vast number of buildings in the purest Christian style. In the former city are tondjs 12 ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. precisely the same ample chasuble, the same dignified vestments, the same recumbent position, with the hands devoutly joined as in prayer, the same brief and Catholic inscription, the same angelic supporters at the head. But not a trace of one of these beautiful features is to be found in monuments of later times. The inverted torch, the club of Hercules, the owl of Minerva, and the cinerary urn, are carved, in lieu of saints and angels, on the tombs of popes, bishops, kings, eccle- siastics, statesmen, and warriors, frequently accompanied by Pagan divinities, in Pagan nudity ; the pious supplication for a prayer for the soul of the deceased, is changed into a long and pompous inscrip- tion detailing his virtues and exploits. Although the shameful inconsistency of these monuments may not appear so striking in the modern churches of Italian style, where they are partly in character with the Paganism of the rest of the building, yet when they are intruded beneath the grand vaults of a Westminster or a Cologne, and placed by the side of the ancient memorials of the departed faithful, where every niche and ornament breathes the spirit of Catholic piety, they offer a perfect outrage to Christian feelings. The furniture executed during and since the reigns of Henry VII 1 and Francis I, exhibits the same debased and Pagan character of ornament which I have previously remarked about the houses them- selves ; and this lamentable change of style extended itself to every class of art and manufacture ; and when anything Christian or sacred was attempted to be introduced, it was so disguised in classic forms as to be scarcely distinguishable from the Pagan subjects by which it of ])opes, exquisitely beautiful, and corresponding in style and execution to our finest monu- ments of the })eriod of Edward III. Italy was the very focus of Christian painting during the IVIiddle Ages, and produced a most illustrious race of Catholic artists, amongst whom are to be reckoned a Giotto, an Andrea Orgagna, a Fra Angelico, a Perugino, and a Raff'aelle. If those students who journev to Italy to study art, would follow in the steps of the great Overbeck, and avoiding ecjually the contagion of its ancioit and modern Pa^-an'i.sm, confine their researches to ifa Christian anftqiiHies, they would indeed derive inestimable benefit. Italian art of the 13th, l4th, and 15th centuries, is the beau ideal of Christian purity, and its imitation cannot be too strongly inculcated ; but when it forsook its pure, mystical, and ancient types, to follow those of sensual I'aganism, it sunk to a fearful state of degradation, and for the last three centuries its productions of every class should only be looked upon for the purpose of being avoided. ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. 13 was surrounded. Indeed all idea of the respect due to sacred repre- sentations was entirely lost, and the most holy emblems were treated as mere ornament, and placed on a level with the grossest profanities. Not long since I saw a dagger of the sixteenth century, which had been undoubtedly used for assassinations, the blade being priced for blood by successive scores, increasing the remuneration in proportion to the depth that the steel was plunged in the body of the victim. Now the handle of this murderous instrument (the very sight of which must fill every Christian mind with horror) was surmounted by an ivory image of the blessed Virgin with our Lord^ while Diana and Adeon were sculptured beneath ! ! And many more instances could I readily adduce to show the utter loss of Catholic art and feelings at this memorable period. The very form of the ecclesiastical seals, which for ages had resembled the Vesica Piscis, or fish, symbolical of the holy name of our Lord, was changed into a circle, in imitation of the classic medals, which were servilely copied even to their very ornaments. The triumph of these new and degenerate ideas over the ancient and Catholic feelings, is a melancholy evidence of the decay of faith and morals at the period of their introduction, and to which indeed they owe their origin. Protestantism and revived Paganism both date from the same epoch, both spring from the same causes, and neither could pos- sibly have been introduced, had not Catholic feelings fallen to a very low ebb. The ravages of the former were carried on by plunder and violence ; the inroads of the latter by pretended improvement and classic restoration. On the whole, however, it must be admitted, that the axes and hammers of the puritanic factions were far less dangerous or productive of lasting evils than the chisels and brushes of the modern Pagan artists, who, by insinuating their pernicious ideas and emblems into the very externals of true religion, seduced the weak-minded, and gained thousands who would have revolted at WiQprofessed mutila- tion of ecclesiastical architecture, to aid in its destruction, under the supposition of replacing it by more ornamental erections. I have here introduced engravings of three sorts of altars to illustrate my position. In the first (see Plate No. I) — the true Catholic one — every por- 14 ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. tioii breathes the spirit of purity and reverence ; the sacred mystei-ies are depicted in a mystical and devotional manner; the full, draped, and modest garments of the figures, the devout and placid position of the angels, the curtains, the embroidered frontal, the two candlesticks and cross, are all in strict accordance with Catholic antiquity and feelings. In the second (see Plate No. II) an altar used for Catholic pur- poses, but of a debased and profane style, — we discern the fatal effects of revived Paganism. The loose and indecent costumes and postures of the figures intended for saints (but which are all concealed copies of the impure models of Pagan antiquity), the classic details devoid of any appropriate signification, the paltry and trifling taste of the ornaments, more suited to a fashionable boudoir than an altar for sacrifice, all evince the total absence of true Catholic ideas of art. In the third (see margin), the efl"ect of the destructive or Protestant principles is depicted. The original ima- gery and tabernacle work of the altar screen have been mutilated and de- faced : the altar itself, — which had served for ages in the most holy mystei ies, and was covered with cost- ly ornaments, — has been plundered and demolished, and a cheap ugly table set in its place, on which the book and bason indicate that it occasionally serves for the ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. 15 purposes of baptism, in lieu of the ancient font, which probably has been removed to serve for some menial purpose. The royal arms, occupying the wonted place of the Redeemer, mark the temporal degradation of the suffering Church, ground down by the civil power. In place of the original rich and splendid window, a few shattered fragments confusedly leaded together, are all that remain, and these will probably be thrown away by the glazier in the next repairs ; and the whole exhibits a faithful picture of Protestant desecration and neglect. In England, as the succeeding pages will show, the buildings have almost exclusively suffered through the destructive or Protestant principle ; but this was not, as I have before remarked, in itself a cause, but the effect of Catholic degeneracy, and we must view its ravages as the scourge of the decayed and compromising Church of England. As all the matter of the first edition of this book referred to this country, it is not altogether surprising that I should have overlooked the revival of Paganism, and attributed the loss of Catholic art exclusively to Protestant opinions : I now most readily retract my former error in this respect, and have endeavoured to assign to each principle its real share in the destruction of Christian productions, I was perfectly right in the abstract fact that tJie excdUnce of art was only to he fou7id in Catholicism, but I did not draw a sufficient distinction between Catholicism in its own venerable garb, or as dis- guised in the modern externals of Pagan corruption. But however defective my former efforts may have been in prin- ciple, their intention, like the present work, is to exhibit in the works and practices of Catholic antiquity — a far higher standard of excel- lence than any modern pi'oductions can possibly afford. If men could only be led to view Catholic truth, not as she appears at the present time, not as she is distorted by popular prejudice, but in her ancient solemn garb, what immense results might we not expect ! The ordinary ideas in England of Catholicism (the pure faith of the merci- ful Redeemer) are associated with faggots, racks, inquisitions, tor- 16 ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. tures, daggers, poisoning, and all the horrors which wretched crafty politicians have perpetrated in various ages, under the name and cloak of religion ; accounts of which, under exaggerated and multi- plied forms, are most industriously circulated. On the other hand, the externals and practices of the Church are so decayed at the present time, that it is even difficult to point out to the enquirer after truth any place where he can behold the rites of the Church celebrated with the ancient solemnity. It is only by communing with the spirit of past ages, as it is de- veloped in the lives of the holy men of old, and in their wonderful monuments and works, that we can arrive at a just appreciation of the glories we have lost, or adopt the necessary means for their recovery. It is now, indeed, time to break the chains of Paganism which have enslaved the Christians of the last three centuries, and diverted the noblest powers of their minds, from the pursuit of truth to the reproduction of error. Almost all the researches of modern anti- quaries, schools of painting, national museums and collections,* have only tended to corrupt taste and poison the intellect, by setting forth classic art as the summit of excellence, and substituting mere natural and sensual productions in the place of the mystical and divine. Before true taste and Christian feelings can be revived, all the pres- ent and popular ideas on the subject must be utterly changed. Men * Any shapeless fragment, any mean potter's vessel, any illegible inscription, provided it be hut antiqne, will be deposited on a pedestal or within a glass case in our national nmseuni. No price can be too great for a cameo or a heathen bust ; but every object of Catholic and national art is rigidly excluded from the collection. In the whole of that vast establishment, there is not even one room, one shelf', devoted to the exquisite productions of the jNliddle Ages. In this we are actually behind every other country in Europe. At Paris, amidst all the Pagan collections of the Louvre, the Christian student will find exquisite specimens of enamels, ivory carvings, jewels, silver work, chasings in metal— all in the first stvle of Catholic art, and of every date. At Nuremberg, Rouen, and many mere provincial towns, are public galleries of Christian antiquities of the greatest interest. England alone, the country of all others where such a collection could best be formed, is utterly destitute of it. In sepulchral monuments we are rich indeed. If correct casts of all the effigies of royal and ecclesiastical persons, remaining in the cathedral and other churches, were carefully taken, coloured fac-simile from the originals, and arranged in chronological order, what a splendid historical and national series they would form ; and this might easily be done at even a less cost than the transport of a monstrous frag- ment of an Egyptian god from the banks of the Nile. ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. 17 must learn that the period hitherto called dark and ignorant far excelled ovir age in wisdom, that art ceased when it is said to have been revived, that superstition was piety, and bigotry faith. The most celebrated names and characters must give place to others at present scarcely known, and the famous edifices of modern Europe sink into masses of deformity by the side of the neglected and mouldering piles of Catholic antiquity. If the renunciation of pre- conceived opinions on these subjects, and the consequent loss of the present enjoyment derived from them, be considered as a gi-eat sacrifice, does not the new and glorious field that is opened offer far more than an equivalent ? What delight to trace a race of native artists hitherto unknown, in whose despised and neglected produc- tions the most mystical feeling and chaste execution is to be found, and in whose beautiful compositions the originals of many of the most celebrated pictures of more modern schools are to be traced; what exquisite remains of the sculptor's skill* lie buried under the green mounds that mark the site of once noble churches ; what originality of conception and masterly execution do not the details of many rural and parochial churches exhibit ! f There is no need of visiting the distant * During the excavations of St. [Mary's Abbey at York, excjuisite bosses and carved frag- ments were discovered buried beneath the accumulated rubbish. There can be but Httle doubt that, by judicious excavations, many interesting monuments and beautiful specimens of ancient skill would be discovered. The excavations at St. Mary's Abbey were most laudable, but the discoveries there made hardly compensate for the detestable building, consisting of a Grecian portico and two wings, erected on part of the abbatial site and approach, through a sort of Regent's Park lodge-gate, which is the present entrance to this venerable enclosiu'e. It would have been hardly possible to have erected more offensive objects than these buildings, in the immediate vicinity of one of the purest specimens of Christian architecture in the country. f There is scarcely an ancient parish church in England which does not present some ob- ject of interest. The sculptured details of those churches which were ei-ected about the time of the three first Edwards, are exquisitely beautiful. In accordance with my rule never to pass an ancient church without examining its interior, I entered lately a small church near Stamford of no very promising exterior, where I found a fine family chapel, and in it two canopied niches, surpassing in combination and execution any I had previously seen. Some of the half ruined and almost deserted churches along the Nox-folk coast are complete mines of carved and beautiful ornament. How little is really known of old English art. The celebrated cathedral may indeed arrest attention, but few ever penetrate among the many noble churches which lie in unfrequented roads, and where the simplicity of a rural population has proved a far better preservative to the sacred pile than the heavy rates of prosperous and busy towns. d 18 ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. shores of Greece and Egypt to make discoveries in art. England alone abounds in hidden and unknown antiquities of surpassing interest. What madness, then, while neglecting our own religious and national types of architecture and art, to worship at the revived shrines of ancient corruption, and profane the temple of a crucified Redeemer by the archi- tecture and emblems of heathen gods. The Pagan monster, which has ruled so long, and with such powerful sway over the intellects of man- kind, is now tottering to its fall; and although its growth is too strong, and its hold too powerful to be readily overthrown, still its hideous form has been unmasked, and the strength of its assailants daily in- creases. Already have some desperate wounds been inflicted on the system. The great Overbeck,* that prince of Christian painters, has raised up a school of mystical and religious artists, who are fast putting to utter shame the natural and sensual school of art, in which the modern followers of Paganism have so long degraded the representa- tions of sacred personages and events. In France, M. Le Comte De Montalembert (a man, of whom it may be said as of Savonarola, the Dominican, sans reproche, et scms peur), has fully set forth the fatal efiects of modern Paganism on Christian feelings and monuments ; and already his denunciations of these errors, and his exposition of Catholic art and truth, have produced a great improvement of taste and ideas on these matters ; and various publications have already appeared, and many more are preparing, on the excellence of the despised Middle Ages. The work of M. Rio on Christian Painting is an admirable pro- duction, and must produce many converts to ancient art. In Eng- land, much has been done towards restoring Catholic antiquity, and a fine spirit has arisen in the head university itself, where a society of learned men has been organised for the study and preservation of Christian architecture. The ecclesiastical antiquities of the country * All those who are interested in the revival of Catholic art should possess en^ia\ iiii;s from the works of this great artist, the reviver of Christian })ainting at Rome. He w as educated in Lutheran errors, hut, a few years since, enihracetl Catholic truth, with several of his associate artists, who, like himself, have directed their talents to the service of religion, hv pourtraying its mysteries in the reverent and devotional form of the ancient days of faith. ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. 19 are considered worthy of patient research and elaborate illustration. Innovators are frequently denounced, blocked arches and windows restored, whitewash removed, and stained glass reinserted. All these are good signs, and promise much for the future. It is true that those who are most active in the great revival of Catholic art are as yet but few in number, and, by the multitude, they are yet considered as fanatics, or at best but visionary enthusiasts ; but well can they afford to bear any obloquy or ridicule that they may incur in the pursuit of their holy and glorious object. In what, I will ask, on calm, dispassionate examination of the oj^inions, can the fanaticism and extravagance be said to exist ? Is it in the assertion that art was carried to far higher degree of perfection by the ennobling and purifying influence of the Christian faith, than under that of Pagan corruption ? In their considering the symbol of our redemption and the images of saintly personages more suitable to the residence of a Christian, than the statue of a lascivious Venus, or the representation of heathen fables ? In their regarding the solemn chaunts composed by St. Gregory himself, and sanctioned by repeated councils, and the universal prac- tice of antiquity, as better suited to divine psalmody, and the offices of the Church, than the extravagant figurings of infidel composers ? In their preferring cloistered, quadrangled, and turreted edifices to long Italian pedimented mansions, for collegiate purposes ? In their following the architecture that emanated from the faitli itself in the erection of churches, instead of adopting a bastard imita- tion of Pagan edifices, unworthy and unsuited to so sacred a purpose \ In fine, by their setting forth the self-denying, charitable, devout, and faithful habits of the ages of faith, as far more admirable and exemplary than the luxurious, corrupt, irreverent, and infidel system of the present time ? ■ Surely, if these be fanatical ideas, then must Catholic truth itself be fanaticism, for all these opinions are solidly based on it. And however they may be assailed for a time, they must eventually pre- 20 ON THE REVIVED PAGAN PRINCIPLE. vail. A warm temperature is not more necessary for the existence of Eastern exotics, than a Christian atmosphere for the faithful. " Tell me what company you keep, and I will tell you what you are/' is a homely but true proverb. Hence, when I see a man professedly a Christian, who, neglecting the mysteries of the faith, the saints of the Church, and the glories of religion, surrounds himself with the obscene and impious fables of mythology, and the false divinities of the heathen, I may presume, without violation of charity, that although he is nominally a son of Christian Rome, his heart and affections are devoted to that city in the days of its Paganism. CHAPTER III. OF THE PROTESTANT PRINCIPLE AND THE PILLAGE AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES UNDER HENRY THE EIGHTH. $ Sing ti)C DceDs of great itmg i^arrg, ^^f NcD t)t!3 son, anU ttaugi^tcr IWari? ; Cijc olU religion's alteration, anD ttje establtsijment's first foundation; ^nO flob) tije Ittng iieeame its ijeatf; l^ob) Abbess fell, iDl^at blooD bias sfjeO; ®f rajjine, sacrilege, anD tfjeft, anU di^ttrcl) of golD anD lanO iiereft. The origin of what is usually termed the Reformation in this country, is too well known to need much dilating upon ; but it will be necessary to say a few words on the subject, to explain the rise of the Protestant or destructive principle. King Henry the Eighth, finding all the hopes he had conceived of the Pontiff's acquiescence in his unlawful divorce totally at an end, determined to free himself from all spiritual restraint of the Apostolic see ; and, for that purpose, caused himself to be proclaimed supreme head of the English Church. This arrogant and impious step drew forth the indignation of those who had the constancy and firmness to prefer the interests of religion to the will of a tyrant, and who boldly represented the injustice and impiety of a layman pretending to be the supreme head of a Christian Church. Their opposition was, however, fruitless, and a bitter persecution was commenced against those who had boldly resisted this dangerous and novel innovation ; and amongst the numerous victims whO' suffered on this occasion, the names of those learned and pious men, Bishop Fisher, Thomas More, and Abbot Whiting, need only be cited to show the injustice and cruelty of this merciless tyrant. 22 PILLAGE AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES The king, however, now established in his new dignity, by dint of rewards to those who were base enough to truckle to his will, and axe and halter to any who dared to withstand his usurpations, found it necessary to find some means to replenish his cofifers, and to secure the assistance he might require in the furtherance of his sacrilegious projects. The step he took on this occasion proved the total overthrow of religion, and paved the way for all those disastrous events which so rapidly afterwards succeeded each other. Ever since the first conversion of this country to the Christian faith, pious and munificent individuals had always been found zealous to establish and endow a vast number of religious houses ; to the labours of whose inmates we are indebted not only for the preservation and advancement of literature and science, but even for the conception and partial execution both of the great ecclesiastical buildings themselves, and the exquisite and precious ornaments with which they were filled. By the unwearied zeal and industry of these men, thus relieved from all worldly cares, and so enabled to devote their lives to the study of all that was sublime and admirable, their churches rose in gigantic splendour ; their almeries and sacristies were filled with sacred vessels and sumptuous vestments, the precious materials of which were only exceeded by the exquisite forms into which they had been wrought ; while the shelves of their libraries groaned under a host of ponderous volumes, the least of which required years of intense and unceasing application for its production. It would be an endless theme to dilate on all the advantages accruing from these splendid establishments ; suffice it to observe, that it Avas through their boundless charity and hospitality the poor were entirely maintained. They formed alike the places for the instruction of youth, and the quiet retreat of a mature age ; and the vast results that the monastic bodies have produced, in all classes of art and science, show the ex- cellent use they made of that time which was not consecrated to devotion and the immediate duties of their orders. UNDER HENRY THE EIGHTH. 23 To a monarch, however, who neither respected sanctity nor art, these institutions only offered a lure to his avarice, and the sure means of replenishing his exhausted treasury ; and, regardless of the conse- quences of so sacrilegious a step, he proceeded to exercise the power of his newly acquired headship, and to devote to his own use and purposes those lands which ancient piety had dedicated to God, and which had been the support of the religious, the learned, and the poor, for so many centuries. He accomplished this great change in the most artful manner, by instituting commissioners for the pretended reformation of ecclesi- astical abuses ; but, in reality, to accomplish the entire overthrow of the religious houses, by forging accusations of irregularity against them,* and by executing those who opposed his intentions, on the score of denying his supremacy. f By such means, he obtained an act of parliament, for the suppres- sion, to his use, of all those houses whose revenues were 300 marks a year, and under. Monstrous as this measure was, by which 376 conventual establish- ments were dissolved, and an immense number of religious persons scattered abroad, it was only intended as a prelude to one which soon followed, and which was no less than the entire suppression of all the larger abbeys, and a great number of colleges, hospitals, and free chapels : of which Baker, in his " Chronicle," computes the number to have been, of monasteries, 645 ; colleges, 90 ; 100 hospitals for poor men ; and chantries and free chapels, 2374. The whole of the lands belonging to these houses, together with an immense treasure of ecclesiastical ornaments, of every description, were appropriated, by this rapacious and sacrilegious tyrant, to his own use, and the rightful possessors were left utterly destitute. This measure may be considered as a fatal blow to ecclesiastical Architecture in England ; and, from this period, we have only to trace a melancholy series of destructions and mutilations, by which the most glorious edifices of the Middle Ages have either been entirely * See Appendix, A. f See Appendix, B. 24 PILLAGE AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES demolished, or so shorn of their original beauties, that what remains only serves to awaken our regret at what is for ever lost to us. On the slaughter and dispersion of the religious, all the buildings then in progress were, of course, immediately stopped ; a vast number of their former inmates fled, to obtain an asylum in some foreign land, where yet the ancient faith remained inviolate ; those who remained, reduced to indigence, became the humble suitors for the charity which they had so often liberally bestowed upon others ; and, with bleeding hearts, and bitter lamentations, they beheld those edifices, on which they had bestowed so much labour and consider- ation, consigned to rapacious court parasites, as the reward of some grovelling submission, or in the chance of play.* They beheld the lead torn from the roofs and spires of their vener- able churches, to satisfy the wasteful extravagance of a profligate court ; and those beauteous and precious ornaments, which had enshrined the relics of the departed saints, or served for centuries in the most solemn rites of the church, sink into mere masses of metal, under the fire of the crucible. Their libraries were pillaged, their archives destroyed ; the very remains of their illustrious dead were torn from their tombs, and treated with barbarous indignity. So suddenly had all this been brought to pass, that many build- ings were hurled down, ere the cement, with which they were erected, had hardened with time ; and many a mason, by the unwearied strokes of whose chisel some beautiful form had been wrought, lived to see the result of his labours mutilated by the axes of the destroyer.f The effect of such scenes as these, on the minds of those clergy who still remained in cathedral and other churches, may easily be conceived. Apprehensive of a similar fate to that which had fallen on their monastic brethren, they remained paralysed ; and no further efforts were made at beautifying those edifices, which they so soon expected would be plundered : and they waited, in dreadful suspense, the next step which the sacrilegious tyrant would take, when either his avarice or his necessities should lead him to it. * See Appeiulix, C. f See Appendix, D. UNDER HENRY THE EIGHTH. 25 It is a very common error to suppose that the change of religion, in this country, was the result of popular feeling, but the mass of the people, on the contrary, were warmly attached to the ancient faith : the truth is, that the great fabric of the Church was undermined, by degrees, one step producing another, till, like all revolutions, it far exceeded the intentions of its first advocates ; and I do believe that, had Henry himself foreseen the full extent to which his first impious step would lead, he would have been deterred by the dreadful prospect from proceeding in his career. He was the father of persecution against the tenets of Protestantism in this country.* By his Six Articles, he confirmed all the leading tenets of the Catholic faith;-)- and, indeed, the only alteration he made in the mass itself was, erasing the prayer for the pope, and the name of St. Thomas a Becket, from the missals. In fine, images were retained in churches, the sacrifice of the mass everywhere offered up, in the usual manner, and the rites of the old religion performed, with only this difference, that their splendour was greatly reduced, in consequence of the king having appropriated all the richest ecclesiastical orna- ments to his own use. It is impossible, therefore, that Henry can be, by any means, ranked among the number of what are termed Reformers, except so far as his disposition to plunder and demolition, feelings so congenial to that body, will entitle him to fellowship with them ; for, indeed, in no other respects was he at all similar to those who proceeded afterwards on the foundation he had laid. He had foolishly imagined, he should have been able to seize the Church's wealth and power into his own hands, and preserve the same unity and discipline as those who held it by apostolic right ; but grievously was he disappointed. The suppression of the religious houses, and the spoliation and desecration of those shrines and places which had so long been con- sidered sacred, had raised doubts and uncertainties among men which were more easily excited than suppressed. The exercise of private judgment in matters of faith, J and various * See Appendix, E. f See Appendix, F. | See Appendix, G. e 26 PILLAGE AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES, ETC. heretical works imported from Germany, had produced feelings of irreverence for the clergy, and contempt for religion, which was in- creased by the innovations they beheld daily made by those in power, on the rights and property of ecclesiastics ; and Henry lived to per- ceive and deplore, that neither his fagots nor his halters could pre- serve anything like unity of creed ; but that, the great spell being broken which had so long kept men together, they were as little disposed to be restrained by rules prescribed by him, as he had been by those of the ancient faith from which he had departed. During his life, however, the cathedral and parochial churches suffered little, except being despoiled of their richest ornaments, all the destruction having fallen on the monastic edifices ; nor was it till his infant son, Edward VI, ascended the throne, that the real feelings produced by the new opinions were displayed, or the work of robbery and destruction fully commenced. CHAPTER IV. ON THE RAVAGES AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES UNDER EDWARD VI, AND AFTER THE FINAL ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEW OPINIONS BY ACT OF PARLIAMENT. altar cloatijs lit scattcrcU, antr ^^txt Bocs a liroften altar stanU ; Some 6tf al atoaj? tije crucifix ; ^nU Bomc tfjc mVoev canUlcsticfes ; Htci) bcstmcttts otijcrs Do conbcg, anD anttpcntJiums ijcar aiuai) ; ^ntJ h)f)at tl)C2 tijougijt not ilit to steal, E^t^ ijurn as an effect of ?cal, ISSarti's ileformatton. Disastrous as the latter part of Henry's reign proved to religion and ecclesiastical architecture, the succeeding one of Edward VI was doubly so. The Church in this country had then for its supreme head a boy of nine years of age, incapable, of course, of either thinking or acting for himself, and fit only to be used as a mere machine, by those who actually constituted the government. These consisted, unhappily, of men who considered Church pro- perty in no other light than that of a legitimate source of plunder, and who, fearing that, should the ancient religion be restored, they would not only lose all chance of further enriching themselves, but might even be compelled to restore that which they had so iniqui- tously obtained, resolved on forming a new system, dependant wholly on the temporal power, under colour of which they might pillage with impunity ; and by abolishing all the grand and noble accompaniments which had, for so many centuries, rendered the sacred rites of religion so solemn and imposing, secure to their own use all those ornaments which served for these purposes, reduce a large number of the clergy. 28 RAVAGES AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES and even demolish vast portions of the fabrics themselves, either to avail themselves of the materials, or benefit by their sale. In order to accomplish these ends, those of the old bishops who would not consent to the impoverishment of their sees were displaced, and their bishoprics filled by men who were willing to surrender large portions of their temporalities to those in power,* in order to obtain a dignity to which they had no legitimate right, and almost as little reasonable expectation of ever possessing. The perfidious and dissembling Cranmer, who during the lifetime of Henry had outwardly conformed to the old system, now threw ofi* the mask, declared himself a bitter enemy to what he had professed all his life, and, in order to ingratiate himself with the favourites of the day, was base enough to surrender into their hands half the lands belonging to the See of Canterbury. All the Church lands were everywhere reduced in a similar manner, and appropriated to the aggrandisement of the nobility's estates ; nor were the spoliations by any means confined to landed ecclesiastical pro- perty : for the protector, Somerset, having conceived the design of erecting a sumptuous mansion in the Strand, caused the demolition of the magnificent cloisters of St. Paul's, the nave of St. Bartholomew's priory church in Smitlifield (which had just been completed), five churches, and three bishops' palaces, for materials — so little veneration for religion or art did these new churchmen profess. Nor, after this, can further proof be wanting to show the total absence of all respect for buildings dedicated to religious worship, when the lord protector, who was nominally the supreme head of the English Church, demo- lishes large portions of the metropolitan cathedral, and a host of ecclesiastical edifices, to gratify a mere vain whim of his own.-f To carry on this work of devastation and robbery, under the cover of restoring primitive simplicity and abolishing superstition. Acts were passed for defacing images, pulling down altars, and seizing on all those ecclesiastical ornaments which had escaped the rapacious hands of Henry's commissioners, or which had been sufiered to remain as being * See Appendix, H. f See Appendix, I. UNDER EDWARD THE SIXTH. 29 absolutely necessary to perform the rites in the ancient manner ; and so effectually were the churches now cleared out, that only one chalice and paten were suffered to remain in each.* The lay re- formers took infinite pains that none of the new rites and ceremonies should either be irksome or expensive, or that they should impede in any way the plunder that was going on by introducing the use of any thing valuable or imposing. In fact, from the moment the new religion was established, all the great Ecclesiastical Edifices ceased to be of any real utility ; the new rites could equally well have been performed in a capacious barn, only the. policy of these reformers' -caused them to leave a few of the buildings, and retain some of the old titles, in order to secure the lands and oblations which, without some such show, they thought it would be impossible to retain and •collect. It is to this feeling that we are indebted for the preserva- tion of those cathedrals we now see : do not imagine, reader, it was the wonders of their construction or the elegance of their design that operated with these reformers for their preservation. It was not the loftiness of Salisbury's spire, the vastness of Ely's lantern, the light- ness of Gloucester's choir, or the solemn grandeur of Wykeham's nave at Winchester, that caused them to be singled out and spared in the general havoc. There are mouldering remains scattered over the face of this country which mark the spots where once, in gigantic splen- dour, stood churches equally vast, equally fine, with those we now behold. Glastonbury, Crowland, Reading, St. Edmund's, and many others, were not inferior to any in scale or grandeur ; they contained tombs of illustrious dead, shrines, chapels, all replete with works of wondrous skill. But they are gone ; condemned to ruin and neglect, they perished piecemeal, and all that now remains of their once glorious piles are some unshapen masses of masonry, too firmly cemented to render their demolition lucrative. And in a similar state should we now behold the cathedrals, had it not been arranged to keep just as much of the old system as would serve for the professors of the^new ; for these reformers, although * See Appendix, J. 30 RAVAGES AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES they professed to revive the simplicity of the apostles in all such matters, the continuation of which entailed expense or irksome duty on them, were quite unwilling to become imitators of their poverty. No, that was another question ; they did not quarrel with the popish names of dean, canon, or prebend, because good incomes were at- tached to them, although I never heard of any of these dignitaries being mentioned in Holy Writ, which to persons utterly rejecting the tradition of the Church ought to have proved an insuperable objec- tion. But an altar, which with its daily lighting and decoration entailed a considerable expense, and as its rich appendages formed no inconsiderable plunder, it was condemned to be pulled down, and a common square table set in its place, as being, forsooth, more agree- able to apostolic use.* Why did not these restorers of simplicity fly the churches, and muster in an upper chamber ? because then they must have renounced all pretensions to the lands ; and so they sat down content in the same stalls, and in the same choir as that which had so lately been occupied by their Catholic predecessors. This is only one among the many inconsistencies that attended the foundation of the Establishment ; and I only mention it to show, to what base and sordid motives we are indebted for the partial preservation of what remains, and how little any feelings, except those of interest and expediency, had any part in it. I have hitherto described the dreadful results which were produced on the buildings by the combined ravages of avarice and fanaticism ; I will now pro- ceed to show how materially they continued to suffer, when the new system was, finally, by law established. The altars had everywhere been demolished ; the stained windows in many places dashed from the mullions they had so brilliantly filled ; the images of the saints left headless in their mutilated niches, or utterly defaced ; the cross, that great emblem of human redemp- tion, everywhere trampled under foot ; the carved work broken down ; the tabernacles destroyed ; and the fabrics denuded as far as possible, * Hooper the puritan was the author of this horrible profanation ; his suggestion, as Heylin says, being eagerly caught up hy those about the court, who anticipated no small p7-oJit tlierchi). UNDER EDWARD THE SIXTH. 31 of those appearances which would announce them as having been devoted to the celebration of the solemn offices of the ancient Church, and left as bare as the strictest disciple of the Genevan Church could desire. Plunder was likewise nearly over ; all that was rich and valuable had long disappeared ; even brass was becoming scarce ; and the leaden coffins of the dead had been so exhausted, they could but rarely be found to supply the melting-pot.* Further excesses were forbidden ; the buildings were declared to be sufficiently purified of ancient superstition ; the axe and the hammer were laid by ; and the shattered edifices were ordained to undergo a second ordeal, almost as destructive as the first, in being fitted up for the new form of worship : and, when we reflect on the horrible repairs, alterations, and demolitions, that have taken place in our venerable edifices, — ever directed by a tepid and parsimonious clergy, brutal and jobbing parochial authorities, and ignorant and tasteless operatives, — I do not hesitate to say, that the lover of ancient art has more to regret, during the period that the churches have been used for their present purposes, than even during the fatal period in which they were first desecrated. The manner of preparing the churches for the exercise of the new liturgy, consisted in blocking up the nave and aisles, with dozing- pens, termed pews;f above this mass of partitions rose a rostrum, for the preacher, reader, and his respondent ; whilst a square table, surmounted by the king's arms, which had everywhere replaced the crucified Redeemer, conclude the list of necessary erections, — which, I need hardly say, were as unsightly as the ancient arrangements were appropriate and beautiful. Had propriety and fitness been considered, instead of economy, the * See Appendix, K. -f- It does not appear, on close investigation, that pews were generally introduced as early as Edwai'd VI : they certainly did not attain the Jull groxvth till the reign of Charles II ; nor did the internal fittings of the country parish churches suffer any considerable mutilation till the ascendancy of the puritanic faction under Cromwell, to whose withering influence half the departures from solemnity and ancient observance, which so degrade the present establishment, .are to be traced. 32 RAVAGES AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES old churches would have been abandoned altogether, and places of worship erected very similar to the dissenting chapels of the present day ; for all that was required, and, indeed, what was most appropriate for Protestant service, was a large room, well-aired, well-ventilated ; a pulpit in such a situation that all the congregation might hear and see well ; a communion-table in the middle,* and two or three tiers of galleries ; by means of which a large auditory might be crammed into a small space.f The old buildings are the very reverse of all this, and totally unfit for any worship but that for which they had been erected ; but there they were, and, fitting or not, they were used for the new service; hence come all the incongruities we see in all ancient parochial churches. The aisles cut to pieces by galleries of all sizes, and heights ; the nave blocked up with pews ; screens cut away ; stalls removed from their old position in the chancel, and set about in odd places ; chauntry chapels turned into corporation pews ; wooden panelling, of execrable design, smeared over with paint, set up with the Creed and Com- mandments, entirely covering some fine tabernacle work, the project- ing parts of which have been cut away to receive it. Large portions of the church, for which there is no use, walled ofi", to render the preaching place more snug and comfortable ; porches enclosed and turned into engine-houses,f and a host of other wretched mutila- tions ; and, when all has been done, what are they but inconvenient, inappropriate buildings, for the purpose they are used for ? And, I am grieved to say, these enormities are not confined to obscure villages, or even large parochial churches : abominations equally vile with those I have above stated, and far more reprehensible, as pro- ceeding from men whose name, education, and station, would have * See Appendix, L. •f By the real decrees of the estabhshment, the chui'ches and chancels were required to remain as in times past : but, notwithstanding, the Genevan doctrines imported with Bucer and Peter Martyr made such rapid progress, that many of the finest churches were soon con- verted into mere preaching-houses for the propagation of the most pestilential errors, and the sanctity of the chancels shamefully disregarded. See Appendix, No. I. I The beautiful southern porch of the once magnificent church at Howden, Lincolnshire,, has just been converted into a vestry. UNDER EDWARD THE SIXTH. 33 led US to hope for better things, are to be found in collegiate and cathedral churches, which are under the control of the highest class, as in those edifices which are confided to the management of the ignorant. See Appendix, No. II. I have now, I trust, shown how intimately the fall of ecclesiastical architecture in this country, is connected with the growth of Pro- testant principles. I first showed the stop it received through the destructions of the rapacious Henry, and the utter loss of those feelings, by which it had been carried on so successfully, for many centuries. I then exhibited how avarice and fanaticism, both produced by the new opinions, had instigated the plunder and destruction of all those splendid ornaments which, under the fostering care of the ancient faith, enriched and embellished every sacred pile. Further, I have shown to what base and sordid motives we are indebted for the preservation of what is now left ; and, lastly, I have shown that, in order to render the churches available for the new system, many of their grandest features were destroyed, and their ancient and appropriate arrangement violated. There is one more result which I have not yet described, but it is one of the most dreadful, the most disastrous, and one which efiectu- ally prevents the possibility of achieving great ecclesiastical works : it is the entire loss of religious unity among the people. When the Common Prayer and Articles had been set forth, heavy fines were imposed, and even death was inflicted, on those who did not receive them as the only rule of faith or form of religious worship ;* and by such means as these, men had been driven for a short time into an outward show of uniformity. But where was the inward unity of soul — where that faith that had anciently bound men together ? Alas ! that was utterly fled. Where were the spontaneous offerings, the heartfelt tribute, the liberal endowments, by which the ancient Church had been supported, and the glorious works achieved ? The scene was entirely changed, and not only had these feelings ceased, but the commonest and most necessary repairs of those very build- * See Appendix, M. 34 RAVAGES AND DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCHES, ETC. ings, which had been raised in splendour by the voluntary offerings of the people, were only effected by rates, wrung by fear of law from the unwilling parishioners, two-thirds of whom, from different motives, equally detested the form that had been forced upon them, and which they were compelled to support. No longer were village priests looked on as pastors of the people, or those high in ecclesiastical authority with veneration and respect ; the former were considered only as a sort of collectors, placed to receive dues they were com- pelled to pay, while the latter were eyed with jealousy by the avaricious nobles,* and looked on by the majority of the j^eople as a useless class of state officers. The increase of these feelings within one century of its first establishment caused the overthrow of the new religion, and the entire suspension of its rites, during the rule of the usurper, Cromwell, a period of English history too well known to need dilating on ; and which same feelings attended its revival with the restoration of the Stuarts, and even at this present day are openly manifested by a vast body of the people. It is right to remark, that a great part of the dreadful devastation described in this chapter, was caused by the rapacity of the govern- ment or temporal power into whose hands the perfidious Cranmer and his apostate associates had betrayed the clergy of the Church of England, who were compelled in a great measure to be passive spec- tators of their own ruin. Even those who framed the new liturgy had no intention of any very wide departure from ancient Catholic practices ; but having been once drawn into the vortex of innovation, they were forced on by the Calvinistic faction, who profiting by the confusion, stript the defenceless Church of its solemn rites, the better to plunder its revenues. Many holy and venerable customs were weakly surrendered, in the vain hope of inducing these pestilent heretics to conform, but, as might have been expected, with miser- able success ; for at this very day the dissenters clamour as loudly in opposition to the poor shadow of ancient discipline that has been preserved, as they did against the solemnities of the Church in all her ancient glory. * See Appendix, N. CHAPTER V. ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. STfie Bjiot t^at angels Detgncti to grace, 3£s tilesseO ti^ougf) rotibers liaunt tf)t place. I WILL now proceed to examine the present state of ancient Ecclesi- astical buildings, after three centuries of mingled devastation, neglect, and vile repair, have passed over them. In the first place, I will commence with the cathedrals, the most splendid monuments of past days which remain, and, therefore, the most deserving of first consideration. No person thoroughly acquainted with ecclesiastical antiquities, and who has travelled over this country for the j3urpose of attentively examining those wonderful edifices, which, though shorn of more than half their beauties, still proudly stand pre-eminent over all other structures that the puny hand of modern times has raised beside them, but must have felt the emotions of astonishment and admiration, that their first view has raised within him, rapidly give place to regret and disgust at the vast portion of them that has been wantonly defaced, and for the miserable unfitness of the present tenants for the vast and noble edifices they occupy. When these gigantic churches were erected, each portion of them was destined for a particular use, to which their arrangement and decoration perfectly corresponded. Thus the choir was appropriated solely to the ecclesiastics, who each filled their respective stalls ; the nave was calculated for the immense congregation of the people, who, without reference to rank or wealth, were promiscuously mixed in the public worship of God ; while the aisles afl'orded ample space for the solemn processions of the clergy. The various chapels, each with its altar, were served by different 36 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE priests, who at successive hours of the morning, commencing at six, said masses, that all classes and occupations might be enabled to devote some portion of the day to religious duties. The cloisters formed a quiet and sheltered deambulatory for the meditation of the ecclesiastics ; and the chapter-house was a noble chamber, where they frequently met and settled on spiritual and temporal affairs relating to their office. These churches were closed only for a few hours during the night, in order that they might form the place from whence private prayers and supplications might continually be offered up. But of what use are these churches now ? do their doors stand ever open to admit the devout ? No ; excepting the brief space of time set apart twice a day to keep up the form of worship, the gates are fast closed, nor is it possible to obtain admittance within the edifice without a fee to the guardian of the keys. Ask the reason of this, and the answer will be, that if the churches were left open they would be completely defaced, and even become the scene of the grossest pollutions. If this be true, which I fear it is, what, I ask, must be the moral and religious state of a country, where the churches are obliged to be fastened up to pre- vent their being desecrated and destroyed by the people ? how must the ancient devotion and piety have departed ? Indeed, so utterly are all feelings of private devotion lost in these churches, that were an individual to kneel in any other time than that actually set apart for Divine service, or in any other part of the edifice but that which is inclosed, he would be considered as a person not sound in his intel- lect, and probably be ordered out of the building. No ; cathedrals are visited from far different motives, by the different classes of persons who go to them. The ,first are those who, being connected with or living near a cathedral, attend regularly every Sunday by rote ; the second are those who, not having any taste for prayers, but who have some ear for music, drop in, as it is termed, to hear the anthem ; the third class are persons who go to see the church. They are tourists ; they go to see everything that is to be seen ; therefore they see the church, — id est, they walk round, read the epitaphs, think it very pretty, very romantic, very old, suppose it was built in super- OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 37 stitious times, pace the length of the nave, write their names on a pillar, and whisk out, as they have a great deal more to see and very little time. The fourth class are those who, during assize and fair times, go to see the big church built by the old Romans, after they have been to see all the other sights and shows. They are generally a good many together, to make it worth the verger's while to send a satellite round with them to show the wonderful things, and tell them wonderful stories about the monks and nuns ; and after they have gaped round they go out, and the sight serves for talk till they see some fun they like a good deal better. Such are most of the classes of visitors to these wondrous fabrics, not one of whom feels in the slightest degree the sanctity of the place or the majesty of the design, and small indeed is the number of those on whom these mutilated but still admirable designs produce their whole and great effect. Few are there who, amid the general change and destruction they have undergone, can conjure up in their minds the glories of their departed greatness, and who, while they bitterly despise the heartless throng that gaze about the sacred aisles, mourn for the remembrance of those ages of faith now passed and gone, which produced minds to conceive and zeal to execute such mighty, glorious works. 'Tis such minds as these that feel acutely the barren, meagre, and inappropriate use to which these edifices have been put ; and to them does the neat and modern churchman appear truly despicable, as he trips from the door to the vestry, goes through the prayers, then returns from the vestry to the door, forming the greatest contrast of all with the noble works which surround him. What part has he, I say, what connexion of soul with the ecclesiastic of ancient days ? Do we see him, when the public service is concluded, kneeling in silent devotion in the quiet retreat of some chapel ? Do we see him perambulating in study and contemplation those vaulted cloisters, which were erected solely for the meditation of ecclesiastical persons ? No ; he only enters the church when his duty compels him ; he quits it the instant he is able ; he regards the fabric but as the source of 38 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE his income ; he lives by religion — 'tis his trade. And yet these men of cold and callous hearts, insensible to every spark of ancient zeal and devotion, will dare to speak with contempt and ridicule of those glorious spirits by whose mighty minds and liberal hearts those establishments have been founded, and from whose pious munificence they derive every shilling they possess. Have they not common decent gratitude ? No ; daily do they put forth revilings, gross falsehoods, and libels, on that religion and faith which instigated the foundation and endowments which they enjoy, and under whose incitement alone could the fabrics have been raised which they pretend to admire, Avhile they condemn and ridicule the cause which produced them. Can we hope for any good results while such men as these use, or rather possess, these glorious piles ? men who either leave the churches to perish through neglect, or when they conceive they have a little taste, and do lay out some money, commit far greater havoc than even time itself, by the unfitness and absurdity of their alterations. Of this de- scription those made by Bishop Barrington at Salisbury, and conducted by James Wyatt, of execrable memory, deserve the severest censure. During this improvement, as it was termed, the venerable bell-tower, a grand and imposing structure, which stood on the north-west side of the church, was demolished, and the bells and materials sold ; the Hunger- ford and Beauchamp chapels pulled down, and the tombs set up in the most mutilated manner between the pillars of the nave ; and a host of other barbarities and alterations too numerous to recite. Nor less detestable was the removal of the ancient tracery and glass from the great eastern and aisle windows of St. George's Chapel, Windsor, and substituting copies of that tame and wooden painter. West ; — designs which would be a disgrace in any situation, and, when thus substituted for the masterly arrangement of the ancient architect, become even more contemptible. In fine, wherever we go, we find that, whether the buildings have been treated with neglect, or attempted to be improved, both results are disastrous in the extreme. The fact cannot for one moment be denied, that these edifices are OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 39 totally unsuited for the present practices of the Establishment, quite deficient in what is now so much studied — comfort ; and since the choir has been applied to the purpose of a parish church, totally wanting in actual sitting room, to gain which the ancient features are being rapidly swept away. What can be so disgusting as to enter the choir of a cathedral church, and to find the stalls nominally appropriated to the dignitaries of the Church, occupied by all classes of lay persons ? and not unfrequently the bishop's throne, the cathedra itself, tenanted, during the absence of the bishop, by some consequential dame ? Nay, so entirely is propriety of arrangement or decorum lost in these churches, that were it not for the presence of a few singing men and boys, and the head of a solitary residentiary peeping above his cushion, one would conclude the assembled group to be a congre- gation of independents, who had occupied the choir for a temporary preaching place. Then the concluding rush out, when singing men, choristers, vicars, and people, make a simultaneous movement to gain the choir-door, produces a scene of the most disgraceful con- fusion. All this has arisen from the alteration of the ancient arrangement of appropriating the choir solely to ecclesiastics ; but this was abandoned by the new churchmen on the consideration that they could never muster a decent show, and so they let the people in to hide the deficiency of their absence. This led to pewing choirs, one of the vilest mutilations of eff'ect the cathedrals have ever suff'ered ; for to what do all the altera- tions that have lately been effected in Peterborough and Norwich cathedrals tend, but utterly to destroy the appearance of a choir, filling up the centre with pews and seats, and contracting the grandeur of the open space into a paltry aisle leading to boxes. It is in vain to cover the fronts of these seats with tracery and panelling ; the principle of the thing is bad, and all that is done only renders the defect more glaring. This picture of the modern state of cathedrals is forcible, but it is not overdrawn ; any one may be satisfied of its truth by inspecting 40 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE the edifices themselves, and the manner in which the services are conducted. Go to that wonderful church at Ely, and see the result of neglect : the water, pouring through unclosed apertures in the covering, con- veying ruin into the heart of the fabric ; the opening fissures of the great western tower, which, unheeded and unobserved, are rapidly extending. Then look at what was once the chapter-house, but now filled with pews and vile fittings, brought from the parish church which the chapter refused to repair.* See how the matchless canopies have been pared down and whitewashed. Look on the decay of the whole church, and then remember Ely is yet rich in its revenues. What must be the hearts of those men forming the chapter ? And yet they are but a fair type of many of the others : I only cite them in particular, because Ely is one of the most interesting churches in existence, and it is decidedly in a vile state of repair. The same observations will apply to most of the other great churches. Why, Westminster Abbey itself, by far the finest edifice in the metropolis (if cleared of its incongruous and detestable monu- ments), is in a lamentable state of neglect, and is continually being disfigured by the erection of more vile masses of marble. Having occasion lately to examine the interior of this wonderful church, I was disgusted beyond measure at perceiving that the chapel of St. Paul had been half filled up with a huge figure of James Watt, sitting in an arm-chair on an enormous square pedestal, with some tasteless ornaments, which, being totally unlike any Greek or Roman foliage, I suppose to have been intended by the sculptor to be Gothic. This is the production of no less a personage than Sir F. Chantrey. Surely this figure must have been originally intended for the centre of some great terrace-garden ; it never could have been designed for the interior of the abbey : for so offensive is it in its present position, that if Sir Francis did really so design it, he deserves to be crushed * See Appendix, O. OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 41 under its great pedestal, to prevent him again committing so great an outrage on good taste. But is this noble edifice for ever to be blocked up and mutilated by the continual erection of these most inappropriate and tasteless monuments ? Have not the dean and chapter sufficient authority to prevent their erection ? But what can we expect or hope for from them, when they suffer filthy dolls to be exhibited within the sacred walls, to render the show-place more attractive to the holiday visitors? Oh, spirits of the departed abbots, could you behold this! The mighty buildings you have raised, the tombs of the great men that lie within them — all is not attractive enough for the mob ; a set of puppets are added, the show draws, and the chapter collects the cash. Oh, vile desecration ! Yet this takes place in the largest church of the metropolis, the mausoleum of our kings ; a place rendered of the highest interest by the art of its construction, and the historical recollections attached to it. Can we, then, wonder at what I before asserted, — and, I trust, have since proved, — ^that cathedral churches are become but show- places for the people, and considered only as sources of revenue by ecclesiastics ? The neglected state of this once glorious church is a national dis- grace. While tens of thousands are annually voted for comparatively trifling purposes, and hundreds of thousands have been very lately expended in mere architectural deformity, not even a small grant to keep the sepulchral monuments of our ancient kings in repair, has ever been proposed ; and it is quite surprising to see the utter apathy that exists amongst those who, both by their birth and station, might be looked upon as the legitimate conservators of our national antiqui- ties. Where can we find another spot, I will not say in England, but in Europe, which contains so many splendid monuments of ancient art — doubly interesting from the historical associations connected with them? If we stand immediately behind the high altar screen, of exquisite tabernacle work and curious imagery, we have presented 9 42 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE at one view the tombs of Edward I, invader of Scotland ; Henry III, rebuilder of the vast abbey itself ; the faithful and amiable Queen Eleanor ; Henry V, the conqueror of France ; Edward III and his queen Philippa ; King Richard II; and last, but not least, the shrine of St. Edward, which, although despoiled of its rich and sumptuous ornaments, still contains the more precious deposit of the relics of that holy confessor, whose virtues have even survived the calumnies of the so-called Reformation, and still are held up to the imitation of our monarchs at the solemnity of their coronation. Through the arched chantry of Henry V, are seen the massive brazen gates and grand entrance to the monumental chapel of the seventh Henry — a matchless example of the latter style. Beyond the tombs I have been describing, extend the aisles and lateral chapels, filled with monumental effigies of ecclesiastical and noble personages, all celebrated in English chronicles, and of surpassing beauty of execution ; and these are contained at the extre'tne end of a church of immense length, and whose groined canopy reaches more than one hundred feet from the tessellated pavement — a church whose history is interwoven with that of the country itself, and should be inconceivably dear to us from its religious, ancient, and national associations. It is not necessary for a man to be an architect, an antiquary, an artist, to understand the vast claims which the abbey of St. Peter's, Westminster, has upon his respect and veneration. If he possess but one spark of that love of country and pride of nation that ought to be found in every man's breast, he would view with religious respect every stone of this noble structure ; but it is soul- sickening to sit day by day, as I have done, and see the class of people who come to inspect this church, and the feelings with which they perambulate its sacred aisles — a mere flock of holiday people who come to London to see sights, and take the Abbey on their way to the Surrey Zoological Gardens. It might naturally have been expected that, from its vicinity to the Houses of Parliament, the Catholic members would occasionally enter its sacred walls, and try to imbibe some of the devotional spirit of ancient days, which its OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 43 venerable architecture and sepulchral memorials could hardly fail to impart, and which should be no small consolation and relief to a Catholic mind, compelled to sit during the noisy debates of political warfare. But I much question if these gentlemen have ever pene- trated westward of Henry the Seventh's Chapel. The apathy of royalty towards this sacred fabric is truly melancholy ; we hear much of the interest certain distinguished personages take in the perfor- mances of a learned monkey, or equestrian evolutions, but small regard indeed do they pay to the resting-place of their ancestors. Even should they refuse to contribute a small sum out of the thousands which they annually squander on trifles, towards so pious and worthy an object as the restoration of the national monuments, a visit to the neglected and desecrated pile of Westminster might teach them the instructive lesson that royalty departed is easily for- gotten ; and if the memory of those great kings of England, who, by their own personal valour and energy, achieved the most important victories, and were foremost in camp and council, is not sufiicient to procure decent respect to their place of sepulture, into what extreme oblivion and neglect must those sovereigns fall after their death, whose lives ai-e a mere routine of fashionable luxury, their greatest achievement a pony drive, their principal occupation — to dine ! I am willing, however, to allow that there has been a vast im- provement of late years in the partial restorations which have been effected in certain cathedral and other churches, as regards the accuracy of moulding and detail. The mechanical part of Gothic architecture is j^retty well understood, but it is the principles which influenced ancient compositions, and the soul which appears in all the former works, which is so lamentably deficient : nor, as I have before stated, can they be regained but by a restoration of the ancient feelings and sentiments. 'Tis they alone that can restore pointed architecture to its former glorious state ; without it all that is done will be a tame and heartless copy, true as far as the mechanism of the style goes, but utterly wanting in that sentiment and feeling that distinguishes ancient design. 44 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE It is for this reason that the modern alterations in the choirs of Peterborough and Norwich, above alkided to, have so bad an effect ; the details individually are accurate and well worked, but the prin- ciple of the design is so contrary to the ancient arrangement, that I do not hesitate to say the effect is little short of detestable. The same thing may be remarked at Canterbury, where I am happy to make honourable mention of the restorations. A great deal of money has been expended, and, I may add, judiciously ; indeed, the rebuilding of the north-western tower is an undertaking quite worthy of ancient and better days. In these works, as far as recutting mouldings, pateras, bosses, &c., and the repainting and gilding, nothing can be better executed ; but when we come to see the new altar-screen, as it is termed, we are astonished that amid so much art as this vast church contains, some better idea had not suggested itself. It is meagre and poor in the extreme, and not one particle of ancient sentiment about it — it is a bare succession of panels ; but this is the result of modern feelings. When this church was used for the ancient worship, the high altar was the great point of attraction : it was for the sacrifice continually there offered, that the church itself was raised ; neither gold, jewels, nor silver, were spared in its decoration ; on it the ancient artists, burning with zeal and devotion, expended their most glorious com- positions and skill. The mass was gorgeous and imposing ; each detail, exquisite and appropriate. Such a design as this w^as not produced by multiplying a panel till it reached across the choir, nor was it composed to back a common table. No ; the artist felt the glory of the work he was called on to compose ; it was no less than erecting an altar for the performance of the most solemn rites of the Church, and it was the glorious nature of the subject that filled his mind with excellence, and produced the splendid result. From such feelings as these all the ancient compositions emanated ; and I repeat, that without them pointed architecture can never rise beyond the bare copy of the mechanical portions of the art. There is no sympathy between these vast edifices and the OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 45 Protestant worship. So conscious of it were the first propagators of the new doctrines, that they aimed all their malice and invectives against them. The new religion may suit the conventicle and the meeting-house, but it has no part in the glories of ancient days ; the modern Anglican establishment is the only one, among the many systems that sprung up, which retained the principle of cathedral establishments and episcopal jurisdiction : and so badly put together were these remains of ancient Church government with modern opinions and temporal jurisdiction, that they have ever proved the subject of popular clamour, and might be suppressed at any time by a legislative act. Then what a prospect to look to ! What new ordeal, what new destruction would these ill-fated fabrics undergo ? The mind shudders at the thought. Would they be walled up as in Scotland, and divided into the preaching houses for the dissenters, the Unitarians, and the freethinkers ? Would they be made into factories or store- houses, like the churches of France during the fatal revolution of 1790 ; or ruined, roofless, neglected, be left to decay like the many glorious fabrics that perished at the change of religion, of which only a few mouldering arches remain to indicate the site ? One of these results would in all probability be produced if the present Establish- ment ceased to exist. One ray of hope alone darts through the dismal prospect ; that, ere the fatal hour arrives, so many devout and think- ing men may have returned to Catholic unity, that hearts and hands may be found willing and able to protect these glorious piles from further profanation, and, in the real spirit of former years, restore them to their original glory and worship. If we turn from the cathedrals themselves, to examine the ecclesi- astical buildings with which they are surrounded, we shall find the changes and destructions they have undergone, to suit the caprice and ideas of each new occupant, are so great, that it is with considerable difficulty anything like the original design can be traced. All the ancient characteristic features have been totally changed, for after the clergy had left off ecclesiastical discipline for ease and 46 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE comfort ; exchanged old hospitality for formal visiting ; and, indeed, become laymen in every other respect but in that of their income and title, they found the old buildings but ill suited to their altered style of living ; what had served for the studious, retired priest, or the hospitable and munificent prelate of ancient days, was very unfit for a married, visiting, gay clergyman, or a modern bishop, whose lady must conform to the usages and movements of fashionable life. Hence bishops' palaces have either been pulled down, and rebuilt on a mean and reduced scale, or their grandest features left to decay as useless portions of the building, and the inhabited part repaired in the worst possible taste. Nor have the rectories and canonries escajDed even worse treatment : many of the old buildings have been entirely demolished, and some ugly square mass set up instead ; and all have been miserably mutilated : the private chapel everywhere demolished, or applied to some menial purpose ; * the old oak ceil- ings plastered up ; the panelling removed, or papered over ; mullioned windows cut out, and common sashes fixed in their stead ; great plain brick buildings added, to get some large rooms for parties ; a veranda, and perhaps a conservatory. And by such means as these the canonries are rendered habitable for the three months' residence. Then, if we examine the buildings that w^ere anciently erected for the residence of the vicars attached to cathedrals, as at Wells, what a lamentable change have they undergone ! When these buildings were constructed, the vicars were a venerable body of joriests, living in a col- legiate manner within their close ; each one had a lodging, or set of two chambers ; a common hall where they assem bled at meals, and a chape] (over which was a library stored with theological and historical learn- ing), stood at opposite ends of the close. All these buildings were of the most beautiful description, and received great additions from the munificent Bishop Beckington ; and so excellent is the arrangement of every part of this close, and its connexion with the cathedral by a cloister passing over a sumptuous gatehouse, and leading to the chapter-house stair, is so admirably managed, that, notwithstanding * See Appendix, P. OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 47 the vile repairs and mutilations it has suffered, and its present de- graded condition, it is still one of the most interesting specimens of ecclesiastical buildings attached to cathedrals, and will give an excellent idea of the venerable character the residences of ecclesiastics formerly 23resented, and the unison of their appearance with that of the structures to which they formed the appendages. But no sooner was the blasting influence of the new opinions felt, than this abode of piety and learning experienced a fatal change. The vicars were reduced to less than a third of their original number, and their lands so pillaged, that this ecclesiastical function was given to laymen, whose only qualification was a trifling skill in vocal music, — that the poor pittance they had left, although quite insufiicient for the support of persons devoted to the duties of their office, might still induce the needy shopkeeper to leave his counter twice in the day, and hurry over the service, to return again to his half-served customers. When the buildings, raised by the munificence of Roger de Salopia and Thomas de Beckington, fell into the hands of such men as these, the result may easily be imagined. Gradually they sunk into neglect and decay ; the dwellings were rented to various tenants, who altered and changed them to their 23leasure ; * and the great hall was used only when some newly- arrived mountebank required a large room to exhibit his feats of dexterity, when it was let out for the occasion, or to serve the even meaner purpose of a dancing academy. The library was of little v.use to such men as these, who never required any other book but that of their shop-accounts ; and who, if they ever handled an ancient author, it was only to convert the pages into wrappers for their parcels. We cannot, therefore, feel surprised that a few odd leaves of manuscripts, and some imperfect and musty volumes of books, thrown into a corner of the muniment room, are all that remain of a collec- * Within four years a baker's shop-front has been inserted in the end gable, adjoining- the dose gate, by the senior vicar ; who unites that useful but incompatible occupation with his choral duties. 48 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE tion, which the learning of its founders leaves us no hesitation in supposing to have been as useful as interesting and curious. To such a degraded state are these lay vicars, as they are termed, fallen, that even the keeper of a public tavern is found among their number. Thus, this man, fresh from the fumes of the punch -bowl and tobacco-pipe, and^'with the boisterous calls of the tap ringing in his ears, may be seen running from the bar to the choir, there figuring- away in a surplice, till the concluding prayer allows Mm to rush back, and mingle the response of " Coming, sir," to the amen that has hardly died away upon his lips. How can we wonder at the contempt into which the Establishment has fallen, when such disgraceful scenes as these have arisen from its system ? Where, I ask, are the often-boasted blessings which the mis-named Reformation has brought ? where the splendid results so often asserted ? Facts speak for themselves ; and, I trust, I have brought forward a sufficient number to show how dreadfully all classes of ecclesiastical buildings and persons have been ruined and degraded by the introduction of the present system. If the limits of this work permitted, I could fully show how baneful and disastrous to art were the effects produced by the Protestants in those foreign countries where they were, at one time, partially estab- lished ; and even in France, where their ascendancy only lasted the brief space of a year, they committed such havoc, that the principal treasures of the churches, and most of the finest specimens of art, were plundered and demolished.* Indeed, whether we regard the fanatic Knox in Scotland, the Huguenots of France, the concocters of the English Establishment, or the puritanic faction of Cromwell, we find that, divided as they were on points of their schismatical opinions, they were united, heart and hand, in robbery and destruction. f To them sanctity or art were alike indifferent ; thirst of gold and wanton love of destroying all which exceeded their narrow comprehensions, mingled with the most savage fanaticism, led them to commit crimes and disorders liarrow- * See Appendix, Q. f See Appendix, R. OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. A9 ing to the soul, both on the score of common humanity and the love of noble art.* That these feelings have partially subsided, is purely owing to the lukewarm feelings with which religion is regarded by the majority in this country; since, only a few years back, the mere sight of a crucifix or a Madonna would have excited far greater horror, and caused more animadversion amongst the godly of the land, than the most obscene and filthy idol that the grossest superstition of paganism could pro- duce ; I and I do not hesitate to say, that there are many, among the fanatical sects which come under the general denomination of dis- senters, who would exult in the destruction not only of every noble religious edifice that remains, but glory in the extinction of all eccle- siastical authority whatever. I cannot conclude this part of my subject without making a few observations on the present system of church and chapel building — a system so vile, so mercenary, and so derogatory to the reverence and honour that should be paid to Divine worship, that it is deserving of the severest censure ; and I will say, that among the most grievous sins of the time, may be ranked those of trying for how small a sum religious edifices can be erected, and how great a percentage can be made, for money advanced for their erection, by the rental of pews. It is a trafficking in sacred things, that vastly resembles that pro- fanation of the temple which drew such indignation from our Divine Redeemer, that, contrary to the mild forbearance he had ever before shown, he cast forth the polluters of the holy place with scourges and stripes. Yes ; the erection of churches, like all that was produced by zeal or art in ancient days, has dwindled down into a mere trade. No longer is the sanctity of the undertaking considered, or is the noblest composition of the architect, or the most curious skill of the artificer, to be employed in its erection ; but the minimum it can be done for is calculated from allowing a trifling sum to the room occupied for each sitting ; and the outline of the building, and each window, * See Appendix, S. f See Appendix, T. 50 ON THE PRESENT DEGRADED STATE moulding, and ornament, must be made to correspond with this miserable pittance. Of the feelings with which the old churchmen undertook the erection of their churches we can easily be acquainted, by referring to the solemn office of the dedication : — 23omus q[uam aelrift'cari bolo domino, talis tsse tsti)ct, tit in cunctis rtgioniijus nommetur; ptac= paralJo, tXQO, ti nectssana, • i^agnus tfit ^cus noster supev ontncs fieos; gttts, ergo, poterit praebalcrc ut aetrificet titgnam laco tromunt, 43omine Seits nostcr, omnts i^acc copta, (juam parabunus ut actrtftcavetur tromus nomini sanrto tuo, tit manu ttia est. €tttis prior laonuno trefiit, et retriljuetur ti 1 The Church commissioners' instructions are the very reverse of these noble sentiments. They require a structure as plain as possible, which can be built for a trifling sum, and of small dimen- sions, both for economy and facilities of hearing the preacher, the sermon being the only part of the service considered ; and I hesitate not to say, that a more meagre, miserable display of architectural skill never was made, nor more improprieties and absurdities com- mitted,* than in the mass of paltry churches erected under the auspices of the commissioners, and which are to be found scattered over every modern portion of the metropolis and its neighbourhood — a disgrace to the age, both on the score of their composition, and the miserable sums that have been allotted for their construction. No kind of propriety or fitness has been considered in their composition. Some have porticoes of Greek temples, surmounted by steeples of miserable outline and worse detail. Others are a mixture of distorted Greek and Roman buildings, ; and a host have been built in perfectly nondescript styles, forming the most offensive masses of building. In some cases, the architect has endeavoured to give the shell the appearance of an ancient pointed church, and, by dint of disguising all the internal arrangements, something like an old exterior has been obtained ; but when the interior is seen the whole illusion vanishes, and we discover that what had somewhat * See Appendix, U. OF ECCLESIASTICAL BUILDINGS. 51 the appearance of an old Catholic church, is, in reality, nothing but a modern preaching-house, with all its galleries, pews, and other fittings. In fine, so impossible is it to make a grand design suitable to the meagreness of the present worship, that to produce any effect at all, the churches are designed to represent anything but what they really are ; and hence, all the host of absurdities and incongruities, in form and decoration, which abound in modern places built for religious worship. With respect to the style of that class of chapels built on specu- lation, it is below criticism. They are erected by men who ponder between a mortgage, a railroad, or a chapel, as the best investment of their money, and who, when they have resolved on relying on the persuasive eloquence of a cushion-thumping, popular preacher, erect four walls, with apertures for windows, cram the same full of seats, which they readily let ; and so greedy after pelf are these chapel- raisers, that they form dry and spacious vaults underneath, which are soon occupied, at a good rent, by some wine and brandy merchant. Of the horrible impiety of trading in religious edifices I have spoken more fully above ; and I repeat, that no offence can sooner move the indignation of the Almighty, or provoke his vengeance, than such a prostitution of the name of religion to serve the private interests of individuals. In conclusion, althovigh I would not, for one instant, deny that prayers, offered from the humblest edifice that can be raised, would prove as available and acceptable as if proceeding from the most sumptuous fabric, if the means of the people could produce no better; — yet, when luxury is everywhere on the increase, and means and money more plentiful than ever, to see the paltry buildings erected everywhere for religious worship, and the neglected state of the ancient churches, it argues a total want of religious zeal, and a tepidity towards the glory of Divine worship, as disgraceful to the nation, as it must be offensive to the Almighty. CONCLUSION. REFLECTIONS ON THE PROBABLE STATE OF THE ENGLISH CHURCHES, HAD THIS COUNTRY REMAINED IN COMMUNION WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Having now shown the disastrous effects of the Protestant or destruc- tive principle, on Catholic art and architecture in England, it may not be uninstructive to take into consideration the probable results which would have befallen the ancient churches, had Protestantism never been established in this country. Judging from what has occurred during the last three centuries on the Continent, it would be presum- ing far too much to suppose that England alone would have escaped the pestilential influence of Pagan ideas and taste which was spreading over Europe at the period of England's schism, and of which even some indications were perceptible* in the latter pointed erections; and there is but too great reason to believe that had the destructive spirit been suppressed, the restorative or classic rage would have been almost as fatal to Catholic art. As it is, everything glorious about the English churches is Catholic, everything debased and hideous, Protestant. This is certainly a melancholy superiority to the foreign churches, which present, in their solemn constructions, and paltry and incongruous fittings, a most lamentable contrast between the ancient spirit and modern practices of Catholicism, setting forth at one view the summit of excellence, and the lowest depth of degradation. A fine old Catholic church used for Protestant service, * In Wolsey's palace of Hampton Court, the heads in terra-cotta on the turrets of the inner gatehouse, represent four of the Caesars. Bishop Gardener's tomb at Winchester exhibits a variety of debased or ItaHan features and details. In the Coinitess of Salisbury's chantry in the Priory church of Christ's Church, Hampshire, are several details in what is termed the rcititi.s.siOHr style. Many instances might be cited to prove that germs of the revived pagan style existed in England }jre\ ious to the separation of the English Church from Catholic connnunion. ON THE PROBABLE STATE OF THE ENGLISH CHURCHES, ETC. 53 is indeed a melancholy sight, but scarcely less melancholy is it to see modern Catholics with their own hands polluting and disfiguring, by pagan emblems and theatrical trumpery, the glorious structures raised by their ancestors in the faith.* The consideration of modern degeneracy tends to alleviate the sorrow we feel at Protestant ravages. Far better is it to see the great abbeys of England, ruined and roofless as they are, than to behold them degraded into mere * What, indeed, can be more agonizing to a faithful CathoHc, than to behold the clergy themselves (the legitimate guardians of these ancient fabrics, the successors of those holy and learned ecclesiastics who were at once the architects and ministers of the temple), filled with the most anti-Christian ideas of art, and united in the destruction of the venerable remains of Catholic dignity, to introduce the bastard pagan style, the very date of which is coeval with the decay of faith, and decline of their influence ? Many churches in France have escaped the ravages of the Huguenots and Calvinists, — many the tremendous revolutions of 1790 ; but not one has been preserved from the innovating and paltry taste of the modern clergy. Were they to confine the display of their wretched ideas to mere fittings which could easily be removed, the case would not be so distressing, but the fabrics themselves are frequently muti- lated past restoration by these wholesale destructives. The Count de Montalembert gives a harrowing description of these barbarities, the truth of many of which I have confirmed by actual observation. Hundreds of stained windows have been either sold out, or destroyed, to be replaced by white panes ; the most curious frescoes and rich painted ceilings have been mercilessly covered by thick coats of white and yellow wash, the usual modern decorations of ecclesiastical buildings. Every vestige of internal sculpture or ancient art has been destroyed, to be replaced by the odious productions of modern manufacturers — " cTohjets (TegUses^'' while the new altars present every possible combination of outrageous architecture and paltry orna- ment, and these are not unfrequently placed in such a position as to conceal the most interest- ing portions of the original buildings. It is quite impossible to enter a French church without being thoroughly disgusted with the extreme contempt of antiquity and degraded taste which their fittings and ornaments display. The result of this is truly lamentable ; for few men are sufficiently instructed in these matters, to discriminate between really Catholic productions, and the wretched externals of modern paganism, which disguise the solemnities of the Church, or to draw the vast distinction between the ancient solemn celebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice, and the theatrical trumpery of a modern fete. Many devout and well-intentioned persons, who are conscious of the insufficiency of the Protestant system, and are favourably disposed towards Catholic truth, go abroad full of expectation, and return utterly disheartened by what they have beheld, and which they attribute to the effect of Catholicism, instead of being the result of the opposite principle. Could they but have seen one of these very churches, now so disfigured, as it appeared in all its venerable grandeur during the ages of faith, how difi^erent would have been the result produced on their mind ; but while the present childish and tinsel ornaments are mixed up with the most sacred rites, and bedizened dolls exhibited as representations of our blessed Lady, it is impossible for a mei-e observer to receive any but unfavourable impressions from the externals of religion ; and to this cause may we principally attribute the very small number of conversions among the numerous travellers who annually visit Catholic countries. — See Appendix, No. 3. 54 REFLECTIONS ON THE PROBABLE STATE means of revenue, and held m commendam by some tonsured child, or converted into a luxurious abode for a few nominal monks. Our English monasteries were cut off in their glory, in the midst of boundless hospitality and regular observance.* We can trace no sign of pagan novelties about their venerable ruins — all these breathe of faith, of charity, of contemplation, of austerity and prayer ; and we can visit these solemn remains of ancient piety with unalloyed reverence and regret, but not so the abbatial remains of France, where the pointed arch and Christian sculpture of the St. Louis is mingled with the fantastic compositions of Francis the First, and the ultra-paganism of the " grand monarque." After the fatal Con- cordat, many of these once-famous houses lingered on till their final suppression in 1790. Large masses of hideous modern Italian build- ings f filled with vast apartments of pagan design, had either been * In the very act by which the lesser monasteries were suppressed, the great houses were declared to be without blame. It is truly edifying to see how exactly the rule was observed in Durham Abbey, one of the richest houses in England up to the time of its suppression. The vast wealth and possessions of the monks were entirely employed in charity, hospitality, and the advancement of learning and art, while they lived in a truly monastic state, sleeping in a common dormitory, rising at midnight to matins, remaining content with one fire in winter-time, and passing their whole time in devotion and study. I have printed some interesting extracts from a scarce book called The A ntiquities of Durham, in the Appendix, which will fully illustrate these facts. — See Appendix, No. 4. -I" At the Abbey of St. Ouen, Rouen, a sort of palace, now the Hotel de Ville, was erected for the residence of the few monks, which resided in that famous house during the seventeenth century, who having abandoned all regular observances of the cloister, resided in separate suites of spacious apartments ; and while they expended an immense sum for their own per- sonal luxury, suffered the western end of their unrivalled church to remain in the unfinished state in which it was left before the Concordat, and which the amount they squandered away in this irregular lodging, would have amply sufficed to complete. The contrast between the abbatial church of St. Denis, near Paris, and the conventional buildings erected during the reign of Louis XIV, is painfully striking. The former is a noble specimen of monastic archi- tecture, raised under the auspices of the illustrious Suger ; the latter a mere classic sort of barrack, undistinguishable by its architecture and arrangement from the hotels of that period. Even the venerable Abbey of Jumieges was disfigured by similar erections, which are to be found in almost all the abbatial buildings of France. At St. Wandrille, an abbey near Can- debec, on the Seine, whose foundations date of the highest Christian antiquity of Normandy, the whole of the conventional buildings, with the exception of the cloisters, were reconstiiicted during the seventeenth century, in the worst style of French architecture ; and the ancient chapter-house, which contained the tombs of several canonized abbots, was demolished, to be OF THE ENGLISH CHUKCHES, ETC. 55 added to, or eveii replaced the conventual refectory and dormitory ; and not unfrequently these degenerate monks had transformed their ancient and solemn church, as far as possible, into a semi-pagan or Italian building, by encasing the pillars with pilasters, inserting semies under the pointed arches, and disguising the original features by festoons, clouds, and similar monstrosities. So fatal, indeed, has this rage for pagan novelties proved to Christian art, that after all the demolitions and destruction they have escaped, the old English churches have retained more of their original features, than most of those on the Continent. They have had all the advantages of neglect, and to Protestant apathy we are not a little indebted, — for both of these are great preservatives of an- tiquity, when compared to either modern innovation or restoration. Salisbury Cathedral suffered more under its pretented restoration by Bishop Barrington, than during the three preceding centuries, including the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI, and the rule of the usurper Cromwell. It is not unfrequently remarked how glorious these ancient churches would appear if restored to Catholic worship ; and glorious indeed would they be could we but revive the old solemnity ; but, owing to the long persecution and other causes, to such a low ebb are the ancient ideas and feelings fallen, that I much question the probability of finding sufficient English Catholics in any one place who would understand the real use of one of these vast piles, much better than their Protestant possessors ; and supposing they had them in their possession, it is not improbable that many choir screens would be demolished, stalls removed, and after a replaced by a mere modern room, while the sacred remains of the illustrious and saintly dead were treated with almost Calvinistic irreverence, and scattered among the rubbish. I have printed a full account of this proceeding in the Appenix, No. 5. It is most interesting to observe the great similarity that exists between the proceedings of modern pagans and Protestants. The Protestant canons of Durham only a few years since demolished the magnificent chapter-house of that abbey, and erected a common sitting-room, such as might be found in any ordinary inn, in its stead. Both the chapter-houses of St. Wandrille and Durham were erected under the influence of the Catholic principle ; the former was demolished by degenerate monks acting under the revived pagan ideas ; the latter by degenerate canons instigated by Protestant principles. 56 REFLECTIONS ON THE PROBABLE STATE host of other barbarous innovations, as the people could not see the high altar through a pillar, or hear the preacher at the extreme end of the nave, the buildings would be condemned as inconvenient and uncomfortable, and by no means comparable to the new galleried assembly rooms used for Catholic worship at the present day, and which have even been built, as if in mockery, under the very walls of our venerable cathedrals.* Indeed, a vast change must take place in the minds of many modern Catholics, to render them really worthy of these stupendous monuments of ancient piety, and heaven forbid that they should ever be restored to a/tiythmg less than their former glory ; for who could wish to see the cathedrals, where a St. Thomas or a St. Hugh celebrated the holy mysteries in ample chasuble and solemn chaunt, disgraced by buckram vestments of last Lyons cut, a semi-pagan altar, and the theatrical quaverings of a Warwick Street- choir ? It is a most melancholy truth that there does not exist much sympathy of idea between a great portion of the present Catholic body in England and their glorious ancestors, and they have fre- quently abandoned ancient traditions to follow the tide of innovations and paltry novelties. Is there a worldly hollow expedient started by some half-fledged sect of Protestants to collect cash, — it is often adopted. Does some hideous mass of modern deformity rise under the name of a church, — it is not unfrequently preferred to an ancient and appropriate model. Nay, the holy mysteries themselves have been made a vehicle for raising temporary supplies, and their cele- bration has been placarded about walls as affording a musical treat * Hereford presents two striking examples of modern Catholic and Protestant degeneracy ; the new church built close to the cathedral, is an attempt to adapt pagan architecture to Chris- tian purposes ; and although it has cost double the sum required for a Catholic parish church, it is a miserable failure. The west end of the cathedi'al was rebuilt a few years since by James Wyatt, of Salisbury-destroying notoriety, and at the same time a large room \\-as erected for concerts on the site of the west cloister, under the Protestant system, — both vile burlesques of the pointed style. It is difficult to say which of these works exhibit the greatest departure from true Catholic principles. The new Catholic church at Bury St. Ednmnd's, is another semi-pagan abortion. Having occasion lately to inspect the glorious remains of ancient art in that venerable town, I could not avoid remarking, that, excepting the new hotel, it was the most uncatholic-looking building in the whole place. OF THE ENGLISH CHURCHES, ETC. 57 to the lovers of harmony, who are admitted at so much per head. Now, although these things may pass muster in these days of chari- table balls and steam excursions, Methodist centenaries. Christian societies, York festivals, and the like, yet how do they accord with ancient Catholic practices ? and what an awful state of degeneracy do they attest among those who ought to be far in advance of all others in acting upon sound principle, and avoid even the semblance of modern expediency. . . . Indeed, such is the total absence of solemnity in a great portion of modern Catholic buildings in Eng- land, that I do not hesitate to say, that a few crumbling walls and prostrate arches of a religious edifice raised during the days of faith, will convey a far stronger religious impression to the mind than the actual service of half the chapels in England. Taking, therefore, these facts into consideration, as Avell as the prevailing rage for paganism during the last three centuries on the Continent, I do not think the architecture of our English churches would have fared much better under a Catholic hierarchy ; for, inde- pendent of the almost certain destruction of every screen in England, we might have had the lantern of Ely terminated by a miniature dome, and a Doric portico to front the nave of York. But let no one imagine for a moment that the preservation of the choir screens and other ancient arrangements, was owing to any love or veneration for antiquity * on the part of the Protestant clergy. The difference between them and their Catholic cotemporaries, is * The Protestant system of turning the cathedral choirs into pewed enclosures, has un- doubtedly saved the rood screens at the entrance, and which have almost disappeared in the Continental churches, during the rage for innovation which prevailed during the last three centuries : and had not this miserable expedient of filling up the deserted stalls of the ecclesi- astics been adopted, instead of the congregation being kept in their original place — the nave, it is most probable that the venerable images of saints and kings that still adorn the canopied and fretted screens of York and Canterbury, would long ere this have been demolished, to throw the vieio of the church open, — the reason assigned for the removal of screens by those modern churchmen who have destroyed this mystical separation between the people and the sacrifice that had existed for ages. The learned Father Thiers has written a most admirable dissertation on the use and antiquity of these screens, in which he appropriately designates the modern innovators as Ambonoclasts, and sets forth in most powerful language and argument, the heinous offence of departing from the appi-oved traditions of the Church in these matters. I 58 REFLECTIONS ON THE PROBABLE STATE precisely this : they left many of the original features standing through indifference ; the latter removed them through a false idea of im- provement. When Protestantism did anything of itself, it was ten times worse than their extravagances, since it embodied the same wretched pagan ideas, without either the scale or richness of the foreign architecture of the same period. Queen's College, Oxford ; the new quadrangle of Christ's Church ; Radcliffe Library ; St. Paul's Cathedral, London, and many other buildings of the same class, are utter departures from Catholic architecture, and meagre imitations of Italian paganism. It is most fortunate for English architecture, that during the greatest rage for classic art, the desire for church building was nearly extinct, in consequence of Protestant ascendancy. Hence many of our finest monuments remained comparatively safe in their neglect, while all the furor for the new style was diverted into man- sions, palaces, and erections for luxury and temporal splendour. And now I cannot dismiss this subject without a few remarks on those who seem to think, that, by restoring the details and accessories of pointed architecture, they are reviving Catholic art. Not at all. Unless the ancient arrangement be restored, and the true principles carried out, all mouldings, pinnacles, tracery, and details, be they ever so well executed, are a mere disguise. It is a great profanation to deck out Protestant monstrosities in the garb of Catholic antiquity ; pew and gallery fronts with tracer}^ panels ; reading-desks with canopied tops, and carved communion-tables ; for however elaborate the ornaments — however costly the execution, and however correct the details may be in the abstract, unless a church be built on the ancient traditional form, it must appear a miserable failure. A follower of John Knox himself, as in the Scotch conventicle in London, may build a meeting- house with pointed windows, arches, and tolerably good detail, but these will always look like the scattered leaves of a precious volume that have been bound up by an unskilful hand, without connexion or relation to their meaning. To apply these venerable forms to any but their real intention, is a perfect prostitution of this glorious style ; a Catholic church not or THE ENGLISH CHURCHES, ETC. 59 only requires pillars, arches, windows, screens, and niches, but it requires them to he disposed according to a certain traditional form ; it demands a chancel set apart for sacrifice, and screened off from the people ; it requires a stone altar, a sacrarium sedilia for the offici- ating priests, and an elevated roodloft from whence the Holy Gospel may be chaunted to the assembled faithful ; it requires chapels for penance and prayer, a sacristy to contain the sacred vessels, a font for the holy sacrament of baptism, a southern porch for penitents and catechumens, a stoup for hallowed water, and a tower for bells ; — and unless a building destined for a church possess all these requisites, however correctly its details may be copied from ancient authorities, it is a mere modern conventicle, and cannot by any means be accounted a revival of Catholic art. APPENDIX. APPENDIX. A. They (the visitors) represented their offences in such multiplying glasses, as made them seem both greater in number, and more horrid in nature, than indeed they were. — Heylin, p. 262. The commissioners threatened the canons of Leicester that they would charge them with adultery and unnatural crimes, unless they would consent to give up their house. — See Hid. Collect, from 36 to 52. Burnet owns that there were great complaints made of the violences and briberies of the \'isitors, and perhaps, says he, not without reason. — Ahrid. p. 182. The infamous Dr. London was appointed visitor to Godstowe Nunnery, of whose vile practices there, the abbess, Catherine Bukley, complains most feelingly, in a letter addressed to the king, which may be seen at length in Steven's Continuation to Dugdale, p. 537. This same Dr. London was so abominable a character, that he was afterwards convicted of perjury, and adjudged to ride with his face to the horse's tail at Windsor and Oakingham, with papers about his head. — Steven's Continuation to Monasticon Anglicanurn, p. 538. The learned and pious Abbot Whiting of Glastonbury, was condemned in consequence of a book against the king's divorce, which had been introduced without his knowledge, being- found in the abbey. This book was brought in solely for the purpose of accomplishing the ruin of this abbot, who firmly opposed the surrender of his abbey. B. In the month of November, Hugh Farringdon, Abbot of Reading, with two priests, named Rug and Dngon, were hanged and quartered at Reading. The same day was Richard Whiting, Abbot of Glastonbury, hanged and quartered on the Torre Hill, beside his monastery. John Thorne and Roger James, monks, the one treasurer, the other under-treasurer, of Glastonbury church, were at the same time executed ; and shortly after, John Beech, Abbot of Colchester, was executed at Colchester — all for denying the king's supremacy. — Stow's Chronicle^ p. 576. The 29th of April, John, Prior of the Charter-house, at London ; Augustine Webster, Prior of Beuall ; Thomas Laurence, Prior of Escham ; Richard Reginalds, doctor, a monk of Sion ; and John Hale, Vicar of Isleworth ; were all condemned of treason, for the supremacy, and were drawn, hanged, and quai'tered at Tyburn, the 4th day of May 1538, their heads and quarters set on the gates of the city, all save one quarter, which was set on the Charter-house, London. — Stow. The 18th of June, three monks of the Charter-house at London, named Thomas Exmew, Humfrey Middlemore, and Sebastian Nidigate, were drawn to Tybiu-n, and there hanged and quartered for denying the king's supremacy. — Ibid, 64 APPENDIX. The 22d of June, Doctor John Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, for denying the king's supremacy, was beheaded on the Tower Hill ; his head was set on London Bridge, and his body buried ^vithin Barking church-yard. — Stow. The .6th of July, Sir Thomas INIore \\as beheaded on the Tower Hill for the like denial of the king's supremacy ; and then the body of Dr. Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, was taken up, and buried with Sir Thomas More, both in the Tower. The 10th of April, Sir William Peterson, priest, late Commissary of Calais; and Sir William Richardson, priest of St. ^larie's, in Calais, were both there hanged, drawn, and quartered, in the market-place, for the supremacy. — Ibid. These are only a few of the many persons this monster of cruelty executed for denying his supremacy. Indeed, it ^\•as the means he ridded himself of all churchmen, whose firmness and constancy Mere a barrier to his innovations. C. Within this clochier of St. Paul's M ere four very great bells, called Jesus Bells, in regard they specially belonged to Jesus Chapel, situate at the east end of the undercroft of St. Paul's; as also, on the top of the spire, the image of St. Paul : all standing, till Sir Miles Partridge, knight, temp. Henry VIII, having M on them of the king at one cast of the dice, pulled them doAvn. Which Sir oVIiles afterwards, temjj. Edward VI, suffered death on ToMer Hill, for matters relating to the Duke of Somerset. — Dugdale's St. PauTs Cathedral, p. 128. D. Goodwin, speaking of a chapel which Stillington, Bishop of Wells, had built adjoining the east side of the cloister there, and in which he was buried, says: — "His body rested but a short time; for it is reported that diverse olde men, who in their youth had not only seene the celebration of his funeral, but also the building of his tombe, chapell and all, did also see tombe and chapell destroyed, and the bones of the bishop that built them turned out of the lead in which they were interred." This chapel was destroyed bv Sir John Gates, in the time of Edward VI. E. The following are among the executions on the score of religion in Henry's reign : — Twenty-second of July, 1534, John Frith, for denying the real presence in the sacrament, the first executed in England for this cause. November, 1538, Mas John Lambert burnt in Smithfield for the same opinion. And StoM- mentioned sixteen different persons burnt for heresy; that is, holding the present Protestant opinions. Fuller, Heylin, and other historians, shoM- that Cranmer sat in judgment, and signed the condemnation of many of these, for the \evy opinions he held himself privately. F. In 1540, the king summoned a parliament, to be holden at Westminster the 28th of April; also a synod of prelates, in M'hich six articles M-ere concluded, touching matters of religion, commonly called "the M'hip with six strings." Article 1, confirmed the real presence in the sacrament. APPENDIX. 65 Article 2, against coninmnion in both kinds. Article 3, that priests might not marry after the order of priesthood received. Article 4, that vows of chastity, made after twenty-one years of age, should be binding. Article 5, the establishing of private masses. Article 6, auricular confession to be expedient. The punishment for the breach of the first article was burning without any abjuration, with loss of all goods and lands, as in case of treason ; the default against the other five articles was felony, without benefit of clergy. — Fox's Martyrs, edit. 1589. It will be seen from these articles what little differences of doctrine caused Henry's separa- tion from the Catholic church, and proves that he was moved to that step from temporal motives only. It is, also, worthy of remark, that the leading apostle of the Reformation, Archbishop Cranmer, subscribed to these articles, and proceeded on them by condemning others, when, in fact, he secretly violated every one of them himself. G. In order to show how soon the private interpretation of the Holy Scriptures was found to produce baneful results, I have transcribed a portion of Heni'yls speech to his parliament, made in 1545, which gives a true and lively picture of the state of religious discord that had already risen, and the rapid demoralisation that attended the departure from the ancient system. " I see here daily you of the cleargie preach one against another, teach one contrary to another, inveigh one against the other, without charity or discretion ; thus all men be in variety and discord, and few or none preacheth tmly and sincerely the word of God. Alas ! how can poor souls live in concord, when you preachers sow amongst them in your sermons debate and discord ? if to you they look for light, and you bring them to darkness ? " Although I say the spiritual men be in fault, yet you of the temporality be not clear and unspotted of malice and envy, for you rail on bishops, speak slanderously of priests, and rebuke and taunt preachers : and, although you be permitted to read Holy Scriptures, and to have the word of God in your mother-tongue, you must understand it is licensed you so to do only to inform your own consciences, and to instruct your children and families, and not to dispute and make a railing and taunting stock of Scripture against priests and preachers, as many light persons do. I am very sorrow to know and hear how irreverently the most precious jewel, the word of God, is disputed, ruined, sung, and tangled, in every alehouse and tavern, contrary to the true meaning of the same. I am even as much sorry that the readers of the same follow it, in doing, so faintly and coldly ; for of this I am sure, charity was never so faint among you, vertuous and godly living was never less ttsed, nor God himself amongst Christians never less reverenced, honored, or served.'''' — Holixshed's Chronicle, vol. ii. p. 972. H. Poynet, first Protestant Bishop of Winchester, passed away all the temporalities of his see conditionally to his preferment to it, in return for which he was to receive certain rectories. — Strype, Mem. Ecc. vol. iii. p. 272. Ridley, within nine days after his promotion to the see of London, alienated four of its best manors to the king, to gratify some of the courtiers. — Ibid. p. 234. k 66 APPENDIX. Barlow, at Wells, 20th May, 1548, consigned by license to the king a very considerable portion of the demesnes and manors of his see. — Collixsox. The following are notes relative to these barbarous demolitions : — Neither the Bishops of Lichfield and Coventry, nor LlandafF, had any recompense for their demolished palaces, according to Spelman ; but Hooper, who had been chaplain to the Pro- tector, had a house granted him in Whitefriars. In the year 1549, on the 10th of April, the chapel in Pardon churchyard, by command- ment of the Duke of Somerset, was begun to be pulled down, with the whole cloystrie, the dance of death, the tombs and monuments, so that nothing was left but the bare plot of ground, which has since been converted into a garden for petty canons. — Stow's Survey, p. 354. In this chapel (standing on the north side of the churchyard) were buried Henry Barton, lord mayor of London, a.d. 1417, and Thomas Mirfin, mayor also in 1419, who had fair tombs therein, with their images in alabaster, strongly coped with iron ; all which, with the chapel, were pulled down in a.d. 1549 (3 Edward VI), by the Duke of Somerset's appointment, and made use of for his building at Somerset House in the Strand : the bones, which lay in the vault underneath, amounting to more than a thousand cart-loads, being conveyed into Finnes- bury Fields, and there laid on a moorish place, with so much soil to cover them as did raise the ground for three windmills to stand on, which have since been built there. — Dugdale's Hist. St. PauTs, p. 130. J. In this month of April, and in May, commissioners were directed through England for all the church goods remaining in cathedral and parish churches — that is to say, jewels of gold and silver, silver crosses, candlesticks, censers, chalices, and such like, with their ready money, to be delivered to the master of the king's jewels in the Tower of London ; all coapes and vestments of cloth of gold, cloth of tissue, and silver, to the master of the king's wardrobe in London ; the other coapes, vestments, and ornaments, to be sold, and the money to be delivered to Sir Edward Peckham, knight : reserving church one chalice or cup, with table cloathes for the communion board, at the discretion of the commissioners, which were, for London, the lord mayor, the bishop, the lord chief justice, and other. — Stow's Chronicle, p. 609. K. Harrington thus relates the ravages and spoliations at Wells : — Scarce were five years past after Bath's rains, but as fast went the axes and hammers to work at Wells. The goodly hall, covered with lead (because the roofe might seeme too low for so large a roome), was uncovered ; and now this roofe reaches to the sky. The chapell of our lady, late repaired by Stillington, a place of great reverence and antiquitie, was likewise defaced ; and such \\as their thirst after lead (I would they had drank it scalding), that they took the dead bodies of bishops out of their h'aden cojfins, and cast abroad the carcases scarce thoroitghljj putrijied. The statues of brass, and all the ancient monuments of kings, benefactors to that goodly cathedral church, went all the same way, sold to an alderman of London. Furthermore, says Stow (speaking of St. Leonard's, Shoreditch), one vicar there (of late time), for covetousness of the brasse, which hee converted into coyned silver, plucked up many APPENDIX, 67 plates fixed on the graves, and left no memory of such as had been buried under them — a great injury both to the living and the dead, forbidden by public proclamation in the reigne of our soveraigne lady Queen Elizabeth, b^lt not forhorne by many, that, either of a preposterous zeale, or of a greedie minde, spare not to satisfie themselves by so wicked a meanes.- — Stow's Survey, p. 475. L. In order to do away, as much as possible, with the idea of an altar, the communion tables were placed away from the walls ; and when the high church party, under Charles I, attempted to place them again altarwise, as they are set at present, the zeal and opposition of the low church party gave rise to many disgraceful scenes and foolish pamphlets. A book called " The Holy Table, Name, and Thing," tells us that, when the vicar of Grantham fell upon removing the communion table from the upper part of the choir to the altar-place, as he called it, Mr. ^Tieatly, the Alderman, questioning him thereupon, what authority he had from the bishop, received this answer : that his authority was this — he had done it, and he would justify it. Mr. Wheatly commanded his officers to remove the place again, which they did accordingly, but not without striking, much heat, and indiscretion, both of the one side and the other. The vicar said, he cared not what they did with their old tressel, for he would make him an altar of stone at his own charge, and fix it in the old altar-place, and would never officiate at any other ; the people replying, that he should set up no dresser of stone in their church. A letter was addressed to the vicar of Grantham about setting his table altarwise. In answer to the letter comes out a book, entitled " A Coal from the Altar,'" which was answered again by the " Quench Coal." And this knotty point, where the table should stand, engaged a host of writers of the time. M. There is no period of English history which has been more disguised than the reign of that female demon, Elizabeth ; for while her unfortunate sister has been stigmatised as bloody Mary, and ever held up to odium as an intolerant persecuting bigot, Elizabeth has been loaded with encomiums, of which she is quite undeserving. The parliament during her reign enacted most sanguinary laws equally directed against persons who professed the ancient religion, or those who carried Protestant principles further than the new churchmen thought advisable for the safety of their establishment. During twenty years of her reign, a great number of persons were executed solely on the score of professing the Catholic faith. Of these, many were in holy orders ; three gentle- women ; and the remainder, esquires, gentlemen, and yeomen. Besides several priests, and Catholic lay persons who died in prison, and great numbers who were sent into perpetual banishment ; to say nothing of many more who were whipped, fined (the fine for recusancy was 9,01. per month), or stripped of their property, to the utter ruin of their families.* In one night, fifty Catholic gentlemen, in the county of Lancaster, M^ere suddenly seized and committed to prison, on account of their non-attendance at church. At the sajne time, an equal number of Yorkshire gentlemen were lying prisoners in York castle, on the same account, most of whom perished there. These were every week dragged by main force to hear the established service performed in the castle chapel. — Dr. Milner's Letters to a Prebendary. * For a full account of these cruel proceedings, see the third volume of Dodd's Church History, edited by the Rev. M. A. Tierney. 68 APPENDIX. The torturing then in practice, Camden, in his Annals, confirms ; who, speaking of the famous Father Campian, says, he was not so racked but that he was still able to write his name. It appears from the account of one of these sufferers, that the following tortures were in use against the Catholics in the Tower : — 1. The common rack, by which the limbs were stretched by levers ; 2. The Scavenger's daughter, so called, being a hoop in which the body was bent till the head and feet met together ; 3. The chamber Little-ease, being a hole so small, that a person could neither stand, sit, nor lie straight in it ; 4. The iron gauntlet. — Diar. Rar. Gest. in Turr. Lond. With what cruelty Catholics were racked, we may gather from the following passage in a letter from John Nicols to Cardinal Allen, by way of extenuating the guilt of his apostasy and perfidy in accusing his Catholic brethren : — " Non bona res est corpus, isto ciniciatu, longius fieri per duos fere pedes quam natura concessit." The continual harassing the Catholics suffered is amply shown by the following extract : — The 4th of April, being Palm Sunday, there was taken, saying of masse in the Lord Morleie's house, within Aldgate of London, one Albon Dolman, priest ; and the Lady Morley, with her childi-en, and divers others, were also taken for hearing the said masse. There was also taken, the same day and houer, for saying masse at the Lady Gilford's in Trinitie Lane, one Oliver Heywood, priest ; and, for hearing the said masse, the Lady Gilford, with diverse other gentlewomen. There was also taken, at the same instant, in the Lady Browne's house, in Cow Lane, for saying masse, one Thomas Heiwood, priest, and one John Couper, priest, with the Lady Browne ; and diverse others were likewise taken for hearing of the said masse. All which persons were for the said offences indicted, convicted, and had the law according to the statute in that case provided. There were also found in their several chappels diverse Latine books, beades, images, palms, chalices, crosses, vestments, pixes, paxes, and such like. — Stow's Chronicle, p. 1158. Death by burning, on the score of religion, was likewise practised : — The 22d July, 1576, two Dutchmen, anabaptists, were burnt in Smithfield, who died in great horror with roaring and crying. — Stow's Chronicle, p. 1162. Mathew Hamont of Hetharset, by his trade a ploughwright, three miles from Norwich, was convened before the Bishop of Norwich, for that he denied Christ to be our Saviour, and other heresies. For which he was condemned in the consistory, and sentence was read against him by the Bishop of Norwich, the 14th of April, 1578, and thereupon delivered to the sheriffs of Norwich ; and because he spake words of blasphemie against the queen's majesty, and others of her counsel!, he was, by the recorder. Master Sergeant Wyndham, and the major. Sir Robert Wood, condemned to lose both his eares, which were cut off", the 13th of May, in the market- place of Norwich ; and afterwards, the 20th of May, he was burnt in the castle-ditch. — Stow's Chronicle, p. 1174. Many more instances could be cited ; but, I trust, sufficient has been shown to prove that the system on which the present establishment was founded and carried on was the very acme of religious intolerance and persecution ; and it is only very lately that Catholics have been relieved from degrading restrictions, which they continued to suffer after the more violent per- secutions had ceased. APPENDIX. 69 N. The Earl of Leicester (favourite of Elizabeth) was at the head of those who said that no bishops ought to be tolerated in a Christian land, and that he had cast a covetous eye on Lambeth Palace. — Heylin's Hist, of Eliz. p. 168. O. The magnificent chapter-house of Ely is now used as Trinity church, in consequence of the chapter assigning it to the parishioners, to save the expense of repairing the parish church, which they were bound to do ; and the lamentable havoc that has been made in this once beautiful structure by the modern pewing, communion-screen, &c., and the fixing of some wretched monumental tablets, nmst be seen to be properly conceived. Owing to the same cause, three other cathedrals have been mutilated in a similar manner. At Norwich cathedral, the ancient chapel of St. Luke, and the south aisle of the choir and apsis, have been inclosed and blocked up with pews, to serve as a parish church for St. Ethelbert's. At Hereford, the north transept is inclosed and filled with pews, &c., to serve as a parochial church for the parishioners of St. John the Baptist. At Chester, the south transept has been walled off, and serves for the parish church of St. Oswald's. P. Formerly, not only the residences of ecclesiastics, but the houses of the laity, were all provided with a private chapel, suitable to the size of the dwelling ; but, alas ! how is this feeling now changed In vain do we look, in modern mansions, for a chamber devoted to religious worship ; and in those ancient dwellings, where the piety of our ancestors had directed chapels, in how few instances do we find them still employed for their pi'imitive desti- nation ! how often do we find they have been levelled to the ground as useless portions of the building ; or, if not so, desecrated to the meanest purposes ! * Rarely, among the canonries, or ecclesiastical residences attached to cathedrals, can we find one that has been retained to its original use ; and how can we imagine religion to dwell with those who will not devote one small niche of their dwellings to her ? Domestic chapels and chaplains are alike falling into absolute disuse ; they will soon be spoken of as things that used to be — as the remains of old superstition, and the relics of popery — the excuse made, whenever any of the ancient practices and regulations which had been preserved, are discontinued. Q. The excesses committed by the Huguenots and Calvinists in France, during the year 1562, are of so horrible and extensive a nature, that to give anything like a narration of them would exceed the compass of a volume ; but I have here subj oined a few notes, to prove to those who may be unacquainted with the subject, the truth of my assertion. During the above-mentioned period, the whole of the rich ornaments belonging to the cathedral at Rouen were pillaged and melted, of which the high altar alone contained six hundred and eighty-two marks of silver, besides jewels, and twenty-seven marks of pure gold, * The ancient chapel of the Bishop of Ely's palace, at Ely, was used as a beer-cellar in 1834. 70 APPENDIX. all wrought into the most beautiful forms. Not only did these sacrilegious wretches plunder all that was valuable, but with fanatic fury tliey consumed all the holy relics contained in the shrines, and treated the remains of St. Romain with the most barbarous indignity. The cathedral was filled \\ith stores of annnunition, and the Divine service totally sus- pended. — DoM. PoJi. Hist. Cath. Rouen. At tlie same time the magnificent Abbey of St. Ouen, in the same city, was ravaged completely : not only were all the precious ornaments and vestments pillaged, but the fury of these miserable heretics was vented on the finest efforts of art the church contained. The rood-loft, uniivalled as a specimen of elaborate and wonderful masonry, was totally demolished ; the stalls burnt ; all the brass work of the choir, which was of the finest descrip- tion, torn down and melted ; and even the tomb of the learned and munificent Abbe Marc d'Argent (founder and designer of this glorious church) fell a prey to their savage fury, and was totally destroyed. — Histoire de rEgl'isc de Saint Ouen, par M. Gilbeht. Paris, 1822. July the 1st, a large party of Calvinists quitted Rouen for a predatory excursion, and, having burnt and pillaged several churches in the vicinity of Barentin, they re-entered Rouen in a sort of tumultuous triumph, some wearing chasubles, others copes, bearing the crosses mockery, and tossing the chalices and thuribles in their hands by way of derision ; some crying "Death to the mass;" others, "Here's a death-blow to the Papists," and similar outrageous expressions. — Dom. Pojiehaye, Hist. Cath. Rouen. Rouen, 1686, p. 126. A manuscript chronicle of the Abbey of Jumieges relates, that two of the monks, going to Evreux to meet their abbot, Gabriel le Veneur, fell into the hands of a similar party ; when they twisted whipcord round their foreheads so tightly, to make them reveal the place where the treasures of their abbey were concealed, that, their eyes starting from their sockets, oije died from excess of agony immediately, and the other. Father Caumont, remained a miserable object till his death. — Doji. Pom. Hist. Cath. Rouen, p. 162. The 10th of May, 1652, being Sunday, the Protestants of Bayeux and its vicinity entered the cathedral church armed ; and having instantly caused the cessation of high mass, then celebrating, they broke down the altars and images, and commenced pillaging the sacred vessels and ornaments. Those Catholic citizens and ecclesiastics who endeavoured to repress this outrage were immediately sacrificed, being either pistolled on the spot, or dragged to the walls, from which, after having their throats cut, they were immediately precipitated. The bishop, Charles de Humieres, and Germain Duval, the dean, only escaped the massacre by gaining the haven, from whence they put to sea in a small fishing-boat that happened to be lying there. — Bezier's Histoire de la Ville de Bayeux, p. 24. The procl'S verbal, presented to the king by the bishop and clergy of Bayeux, on the re- establishment of the ecclesiastics in 1563, gives a detailed account of all the destructions and robberies connnitted on the cathedral, while in the possession of tliese fanatics. It is too long for insertion here, but the following facts may be gathered from it: — That every precious ornament whatever, as well as vestments of all descriptions, had been pillaged and destroyed; that a great portion of the stained windows were dashed out. The stalls, bishop's throne, chapel-screens, organ-case, and every description of wood carving, had been broken up and carried away. The charters, all archi\'es belonging to the cathedral, had been burned, as well as the library. That the bodies of the ancient ecclesiastics, including the Patriarch de Harcour, had been disinterred, the bodies left exposed, and their coffins melted down. That all the brass work, consisting of effigies on tombs, an immense crown of admirable workman- ship that hung in the choir, and other curious ornaments, had likewise been melted. That all the scaffolding, cords, pulleys, and materials, that were employed about the repair of the APPENDIX. 71 edifice, had been sold and removed. The ten great bells had been broken and melted, as well as the oi'gan pipes, and four thousand weight of lead from the roof, which had been cast into ammunition. Besides a great variety of other demolitions and acts of cruelty, practised on the ecclesiastics in the city, the whole of which are given at length in Bezier's Histoire de la Ville de Bayeux, beginning at page 3 of the Appendix. From these historical accounts of only a few of the very extensive outrages committed by the Protestants in France, I leave the candid and impartial reader to judge if I have gone too far in my assertion. R To prove the truth of the great similarity of the various classes of Protestants in their out- rages, I wish to refer the reader to the description of the demolitions at Wells, described in this Appendix under the letter K. I have also subjoined some extracts from an account of the excesses committed by the Puritans, during the civil wars, at Peterborough cathedral. " Espying that rare work of stone over the altar, admired by all travellers, they made all of it rubbish, breaking up, also, the rayles, of which they compiled bonfires ; tumbling the communion table over and over. They were, also, so offended with the memorials of the dead, that not one monument in the church remained undefaced. When their unhallowed toylings had made them out of wind, they took breath afresh on two pair of organs, piping with the same about the market-place lascivious jigs, whilst their conn-ades danced after them in surplices. The clappers of the bells they sold, with the brass they had slaied from the grave- stones ; nor was any window suffered to remain unshattered, or remarkable place unruined." It is well worthy of remark, that the outrage at Wells was conducted by the advocates of the new opinions, in the time of Edward VI, and that this attack on Peterborough was carried on by the Puritans, another class of Protestants, one century after ; so that those, who had been the abettors of schism, suffered by the very principles they had introduced : for these fanatics seem to have held the surplices of the establishment in as much abhorrence and derision as the others had formerly the vestments of the ancient church which they had plundered and destroyed. The fact is, the present establishment, in its episcopacy and ancient form of church go^'ernment, has too much of the old system about it to suit the levelling and destructive feelings produced by real Protestantism. At the time of the Commonwealth the establishment was overthi'own, and is at present in a most insecure state, not from the combinations and cabals of Catholics, but from the extending principles of contempt for ecclesiastical authority, and the all-sufficient private judgment in matters of religion, which are inseparable from Protestant opinions. The history of this country, since the change of religion, ought to convince the churchmen of this country of the utter impossibility of preserving a national church or unity of creed without Catholic communion. The daily extending sects of dissenters are ample evidences of this fact ; all of which have been produced by the same principles as those which founded the establishment itself : but, either from inherent hatred against the ancient religion, or from infatuation and blindness, many modern clergymen continually preach against the Catholics of this country as unheeding the mass of zealous Protestant dissenters, who openly clamour against them, and the undermining effects of nine-tenths of their own brethren, who not onlv disbelieve, but openly condemn, various portions of the articles, creeds, and discipline, as they are at present by law established. For a confirmation of this assertion, see that admirable Letter of Dr. Milner to Dr. Sturges, of Winchester, demonstrating the low church principles to be entirely subversive of the original tenets of the Church of England. 72 APPENDIX. s. Wherever Vandemerk and Sonoi, both Keu tenants to the Prince of Orange, carried their arms, they invariably put to death, in cold blood, all the priests and religious they could lay hands upon, as at Odenard, Rureniond, Dort, Middlebourg, Uelft, and Shonoven. — See Hist. Ref. des Pays Bas, by the Protestant minister Dk Bkaxt. Of the horrible barbarities practised by this Sonoi, a copious account is given in UAbrege ym- bolisme trinitaire de son abside carre, par le nombre prodigieux de ses chapelles, cette cathe- drale inspire aux chefs de la cite a peu pres autant de synipathie cjue Xotre-Uame aux ediles parisiens. Ses abords, deja encombres d une maniere facheuse, le seront bientot completement par la construction d\ni grand nombre de maisons sur Templacement du cloitre, vendu pendant la revolution. Ce terrain pouvait etre rachete par la ville pour une somme insignifiante ; mais, aux reclamations elevees par des personnes intelligentes et zelees, il a ete repondu, par un mao-istrat, en ces termes : " Franchement, je ne m'interesse pas aux edifices dece genre; c'est a ceux (jui aiment le culte a Tappuyer."'' Reponse digne, comme on le voit, de cette nmnici- palite (jui a eu le privilege de detruire le plus ancien monument historique de Erance, le tour * En 1837, lors de la discussion, a la chambre des pairs, sur la cession du terrain de rarchevec-he a la ville, on eleva quelques objections sur cette cession a titre gratuit. II fut repondu que Tetat etait suffisamment dedommage par I'obligation que contractait la ville d 'entourer ce terrain dune grille ! On voit comme cette obligation a ete bien t Page 38 de son rapport au ministre. APPENDIX. 83 de Louis d'Outiemer, et qui passera a la posterite, flagellee par Timpitoyable verve de M. Hugo.* Ailleurs, c"'est encore le meme indifference, ou plutot le meme aversion pour tout ce qui tient a Fhistoire ou a Tart. A Langres, quelques jeunes gens studieux avaient humblement demande au conseil municipal Toctroi de Tabside de Saint-Didier, la plus ancienne eglise de la ville (aujourd'hui enlevee au culte), afin d'y commencer un niusee d'antiquites locales, institution vraiment indispensable dans une contree ou cliaque jour, en fouillant le sol, on decouvre d'in- nonibrables monuniens de la domination romaine. Mais le sage conseil a refuse tout net, et a prefere transformer sa vieille eglise en depot de bois et pompes. — La guerre declaree a une grande idee historique vaut bien la guerre faite a un monument ; voila pourquoi nous allons encore parler de Dijon. Ce n'est pas assez pour cette ville d'avoir detruit, en 1803, sa Sainte- Chapelle, oeuvre merveilleuse de la generosite des dues de Bourgogne ; d'avoir transforme ses belles eglises de Saint-Jean en magasin de tonneaux, de Saint-Etienne en marche convert, et de Saint-Philibert en ecuries de cavalerie ; nous allons citer un nouveau trait de son histoire. On sait que saint Bernard est ne a Fontaines, village situe a peu pres aussi loin de Dijon que Montmartre Test de Paris. On y voit encore, a cote d'une curieuse eglise, le chateau de son pere, transforme en convent de feuillans, sou,s Louis XIII, et conserve avec soin par le proprietaire actuel, M. Girault."f" On a ouvert dernierement une nouvelle porte sur la route qui conduit a ce village : la voix publique, d\m commun accord, lui a donne le nom de Porte Saint-Bernard, et le lui conserve encore. Mais devant le conseil municipal il a en ete autre- ment. Lorsque cette proposition y a ete faite, il s'est trouve un orateur assez intelligent pour declarer que saint Bernard etait un Janatique et un mystique dont les allures sentaient le carlisme et le jesuitisme, et qui, dans tous le cas, rCavait rienjciit pour la ville de Dijon! ! Et le conseil municipal s'est range de cet avis. Je regrette, pour mon compte, que par voie d'amendement on n'ait pas nomme la porte d'apres un homme aussi eclaire que cet orateur, mais, dans tous les cas, il aura ete recompense par la sympathie et Papprobation de M. Eusebe Salverte, qui, dans la derniere session a si energiquement blame le niinistere d'avoir consacre quelques faibles sonnnes a Tentretien de Teglise de Ve'zelay, ou saint Bernard, en prechant la seconde croisade, avait trouve moyen de plonger les populations fanatisees plus avant dans la stagnation feodale.\ Si maintenant nous passons des autorites municipales a la troisieme des categories de vandales que j'ai autrefois etablies, celle des proprietaires, il nous faut avouer que le mal, moins facile a connaitre et a denoncer, est peut-etre la plus vaste encore que partout ailleurs. Nul ne saurait mesurer toute la portee de ces devastations intimes : comme le travail de la taupe, elles echappent a Texamen et a Toppositibn. Ce qu'il y a de plus facheux pour Tart dans les dispositions de la plupart des proprietaires fran^ais, c'est leur horreur des mines. Autrefois on fabriquait des mines artificielles dans les jardins a Tanglaise ; aujourd'hui on trouve aux mines veritables des edifices les plus curieux un air incomfortable, que Ton s'empresse de faire disparaitre, en achevant leur demolition. Celui qui aura sur ses domaines ([uelques debris du chateau de ses peres, ou d\ni abbaye incendiee a la revolution, au lieu de coniprendre tout ce qu'il pent y avoir d'interet historique ou de beaute pittoi-esque dans ces vieilles pierres, n'y * Ajoutons que le conseil-general de TAisne vote pres de deux millions par an pour ses routes, qu'il ne parvient pas a employer toute cette somme : mais qu'il refuse d'en consacrer un vingtieme, un oinquantieme aux reparations urgentes de Tedifice le plus remarquable du departement. II se borne a exprimer le voeu que le gouvernement veuille bien le classer parmi les monumens nationaux ; comme si tous les autres departemens n'avaient pas des cathedrales dignes d'etre rangees dans la meme categorie. t Bien loin d'imiter tant de proprietaires vandales, ou pour le moins indifFerens, M. Girault a public un fort bon opuscule intitule : la Mahion natale de Saint Bernard a Fonta'oie-lez-Dijon, 1824. X Discussion du budget de I'interieur, en 1838. 84 APPENDIX. verra cju'iine carriere a exploiter. C"e.st aiusi cjiront disparu iiotaninient toutes les belles cglises anciennes des inonastcres, dont on a quelquefois utilise les bjitimens d'habitation : c'est aiiisi, par exemple, cjiie nous avons vu vendre il y a trois naois, jusqu'ii la derniere pierre dc Teglise de Foigny en Thierache, pres la Capelle, eglise fondee par saint Bernard, cjui avait sys- tematicjue de la venerable anticiuite; mais ce qui semble specialement expose a sis coups, ce sont les anciens fonts baptismaux, objets de Fetude et de Fappreciation toute paiticulicre de nos voisins les Anglais. A Lagery, pres Reims, le cure a fait briser des fonts roniains pour les remplacer par des fonts modernes. II en est de meme dans presque toutes les eglises du nord et de Fest de la France ; partout les fonts sont brises ou relegues tlans un coin obscur, * Arnaud, Antlquitih de Troyes, 1827. APPENDIX. 87 pour faire place a quelque conque paienne. l)e Pautre cote de la France, pres Poitiers, dans una eglise dont jai le tort d'avoir oublie le noni, il y avait un ancien font baptismal par immersion. Cette particularite si rare et si curieuse n'a pas sufR pour lui faire trouver grace devant le cure, qui Pa fait deti'uire. Ailleurs ce sent ces vieilles tapisseries, si estimees aujourd'hui des antiquaires, surtout depuis que le bel ouvrage de M. Achille Jubinal est venu reveler toute la beaute et toute Tiraportance. A Clermont en Auvergne, il y a dans la cathe- drale douze tapisseries provenant de Tancien eveche, et faites de 1505 a 1511, sous la direction de Jacques d'Amboise, membre de cette illustre famille si genereusement amie des arts ; elle.s sont toutes dechirees, moisies et abimees de poussiere. M. Thevenot, membre du comite des arts, avait ofFert de les nettoyer a ses frais et d'en prendre un cal(]ue ; mais le chapitre lui a repondu par un refus. A Notre-Dame de Reims, il y a encore (Pautres tapisseries du xiv® siecle, qui sont decoupees, et servent de tapis de pied au trone episcopal. En revanche, quand on aui-a besoin de ce genre de parures pour certaines fetes de TEglise, comme c'est encore Tusage a Paris pour la semaine sainte, soyez sur qu'on ira chercher au hasard, dans qnelque garde-meuble, tout ce qu'il y aui'a de plus ridiculement contradictoire avec la saintete du lieu et du temps ; c'est ainsi que le vendredi saint de cette annee 1838, tout le monde a pu voir au tombeau de Saint-Sulpice, le Fest'm (TAntoine et CUopatre (Cleopatre dans le costume le plus leger), et a celui de Saint-Germain PAuxerrois, Verms nmenant T Amour aux ntjmphes de Calypso! Terminons cette serie par un dernier trait de ce genre: a Saint-Guilhem, entre Montpellier et Lodeve, il y a une eglise batie, selon la tradition, par Charlemagne, et dont I'autel a ete donne par saint Gregoire VII ; cet autcl a ete arrache, relegue dans un coin, par le cure qui y a substitue un autel en bois peint, oubliant sans doute cju'il outrageait ainsi les deux plus grands noms du moyen age catholique, Charlemagne et Gregoire VII ! Quand on a ainsi dispose de la partie mobiliere, il reste Timmeuble, que Ton s'evertue le mieux que Ton pent a revetir d'un deguisement moderne. Quelle est Teglise de France qui ne porte les traces de ces anachronismes trop souvent irreparables ? Helas ! il n'y en a litterale- ment pas une seule. La ou la pioche et la rape n'ont pas laboure ces saintes pierres, Pignoble badigeon les a toujours souillees. Qu'ils parlent, ceux qui ont eu le bonheur de voir une de nos cathedrales du premier ordre, Chartres, par exemple, il y a quelques dix ans, avant qu'elle ne fut jaunie de cet ocre blafard que Teveque a mis tantde zele a obtenir, et qu'ils nous disent, si la parole leur suffi pour cela, tout ce cju'une eglise pent perdre en grandeur, en majeste, en saintete, a ce sot travestissement ! Statues, bas-reliefs, chapiteaux, rinceaux, fresques, pierres tombales, epitaphes, inscriptions pieuses, rien n'est epargne : il faut que tout y passe ; il faut cacher tout ce qui pent rappeler les siecles de foi et d'enthousiasme religieux, ou du iiioins rendre meconnaissable ce qu'on ne pent completement aneantir. D'ovi il resultera cet autre avantage, que les murs de Teglise seront plus eclatans cpie le jour qui doit penetrer par les fenatres, meme quand celles-ci seront degarnies de leurs vitraux, et que par consequent les conducteurs naturels de la lumiere auront Pair de lui faire obstacle. Faii-e Thistoire des ravages du badigeon, ce serait faire la statistique ecclesiastique de la France ; je me borne k invoquer la vengeance de la publicite contre les derniers attentats qui sont parvenus a ma connaissance. A Coutances, dans cette fameuse cathedrale qui a si long-temps occupe les archeologues, le dernier eveque a fait peindre en jaune les deux collateraux, et la nef du milieu en blanc, en meme temps qu'il ecrasait Tun des transepts sous la masse informe d'un autel dedie a saint Pierre, parce qu'il s''appelait Pierre. A Boury, village pres Gisors, le cure a trouve bon de donner a sa vieille eglise le costume suivant : les gros niurs en bleu, les colonnes «n rose, le tout releve par des plinthes et des corniches en Jnuiie. A Laon, Teglise romane de la fameuse abbaye de Saint-Martin a ete badigeonnee en ocre des pieds a la tete, par son cure, 88 Al'I'EXDIX. et dans la cathcdrale, cette charmante chapelle de la Merge qui a germe comme une fleur sur les lignes severes du transept septentrional, a etc recouverte d'un jaune epais, et ornee d'une serie d'arcades a rez-terre, en vert marhre, relevees par des colonnes orange ; cette mascarade est due a un ecclesiastique de la paroisse, et il nV a de plus affreux que la longue balustrade qui coupe par le milieu Textremite carree du choeur, et qui est peint en noir parce que le mur auquel elle s'appuie, est peinte en blanc. A la grande coUegiale de Saint-Quentin, il y a autour du choeur cinq cliapelles que M. Mtet a cjualific'es avec raison de " ravissantes, d'un gout et d\ni dessin tout-a-foit maurescjue." * IMais je ne sais si, de son temps, celle du chevet etait deforce avec des bandes de papier peint niai-brc, absolument comme Fantichambre d'un hotel garni, avec un prctendu vitrail en petits caiTcs de verre bleus et rouges, a travers lesquels les enfans peuvent s'amuser a voir trembloter le feuillage d'un arbre plante au chevet de Feglise. On n'a pas respectc davantage la curieuse eglise de Tabbaye de Saint-]\Iichel en Thicrache, (jue je reconnnande vivement aux antiAT.E IMV ST S£ND-_ A ELEV ATIONS 3 5ICTtON' TEMPLE OF TASTE, AND ARCH ITECTV RAL REPOSITORY DESIGNS wanteh CDMPO FfeO^JTS FORWARDED TQALL PART^ ^.j tke KiNC D OM - _£TEAM . CONV EYAWCE ON THE SHORTEST UOTICE. hLACEi STTVATIONS JiESiG>lS-_ER£PAR£J2__ESTi MATES AND SVPER.1NTEN DAMCX _ __AT _ll PER CENT !!! _0F THE TH J S I LLVST RATION PAACT JSE OF __AMHJTEXXVA^LN__THI,__ 19- C£ fcJTVR^ OK _ N-LW:J-M_£E.OVED _AND C_H_EAP PRINCIPLES LS B-E^-LCAI F D WITKO VT P ERMlSStON TO TKiL_TRADEL \