Digitized by the Internet Archi in 2016 with funding from Getty Research Institute ve https://archive.org/details/documentsrelatin38atth DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE FOUNDATION AND ANTIQUITIES OP THE COLLEGIATE CHURCH OF MIDDLEHAM, IN THE COUNTY OP YORK ; WITH AN HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION, AND INCIDENTAL NOTICES OF THE CASTLE, TOWN, AND NEIGHBOURHOOD. BY THE REV. WILLIAM ATTHILL, CANON AND SUB-DEAN OF MIDDLEHAM. LONDON: PRINTED FOR THE CAMDEN SOCIETY, BY JOHN BOWYER NICHOLS AND SON, 25 , PARLIAMENT-STREET. M.DCCC.XL.VII. COUNCIL or THE CAMDEN SOCIETY FOR THE KEAR 1846-7. President , THE RIGHT HON. LORD BRAYBROOKE, F.S.A. THOMAS AMYOT, ESQ. F.R.S., Treas. S.A. Director. BERIAH BOTFIELD, ESQ. M.P., F.R.S., F.S.A. JOHN PAYNE COLLIER, ESQ. F.S.A. Treasurer. C. PURTON COOPER, ESQ. Q.C., D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A. WILLIAM DURRANT COOPER, ESQ. F.S.A. BOLTON CORNEY, ESQ., M.R.S.L. SIR HENRY ELLIS, K.H., F.R.S., Sec. S.A. THE REY. JOSEPH HUNTER, F.S.A. PETER LEVESQUE, ESQ. F.S.A. SIR FRANCIS PALGRAVE, K.H., F.R.S. THOMAS JOSEPH PETTIGREW, ESQ. F.R.S., F.S.A. THOMAS STAPLETON, ESQ., V.P.S.A. WILLIAM J. THOMS, ESQ. F.S.A., Secretary. ALBERT WAY, ESQ. M.A., F.S.A. THOMAS WRIGHT, ESQ. M.A., F.S.A. The Council of the Camden Society desire it to be under- stood that they are not answerable for any opinions or observa- tions that may appear in the Society’s publications the Editors of the several works being alone responsible for the same. TO THE VERY REVEREND P. S. WOOD, LL.D. DEAN OF THE COLLEGIATE CHURCH AND ROYAL PECULIAR OF MIDDLEHAM, IN THE COUNTY OF YORK. Dear Mr. Dean, Indebted to your friendship for the position which I hold in the Collegiate Church of which you are the head, I cannot resist my desire of dedicating its history to you ; and most gladly do I embrace the opportunity thus afforded me of tendering my sincere and grateful thanks for the many and continuous acts of kindness which, during the period of my connexion with you, now approaching to eight years, I have at all times, and under all circumstances, experienced at your hands. That you may long continue to preside over the ancient College of Middleham, and enjoy every blessing which this world can afford, is not alone the earnest desire of myself, and every member of your chapter, but also of the many friends who have enjoyed your hospitalities DEDICATION. during your visits to this seat of your jurisdiction, or who have experienced the still greater gratification of being occasionally inmates of your happy and refined home. Indebted as I am to you for many pleasant visits there, as well as for the other favours to which I have already alluded, I can only entreat that you will accept the renewed assurances of esteem and gratitude, from, Dear and Very Reverend Sir, Your obliged and faithful servant, WILLIAM ATTHILL. The Deanery , Middleham , Yorkshire , Jan . 1, 1847. PREFACE. The desire which so generally prevails at the present day of illustrating the ecclesiastical annals of our country, and of record- ing whatever may be interesting or valuable in the pious and munificent institutions of our ancestors, has led to the production of the present volume. The College of Middleham, one of the very few religious foundations which escaped the sacrilegious rapacity of the Eighth Henry, seems doomed at length, after an existence of nearly four centuries from the date of incorporation by its royal founder, to sink beneath the more specious but no less positive sacrilege of the nineteenth century. To preserve some faint memorials of this establishment, for which the princely Gloucester procured privileges and immunities rivalling those of Windsor,* and exceeding those of any other ecclesiastical institution in the kingdom ; to save from the de- cay into which ere long they might otherwise have fallen, some most interesting documents of bygone days ; to rescue from oblivion the few notices which may still be collected of its history ; and to throw every possible light on the exemptions and liberties of a jurisdiction, which, with every other peculiar throughout * See Introduction, infra , p. 28, note. Vlll PREFACE. “Merrie England,” soon will have passed away — these are the primary objects of the editor of the present volume ; should it, however, be instrumental in preserving the faintest memorial, the most trifling remnant, of an establishment for the incorpora- tion of which its royal founder laboured so assiduously, he will consider himself well repaid. The sources from which this brief history of the collegiate church of Middleham has been drawn, are fully detailed in the notes appended to the foot of each page ; and no available source has been left uninvestigated to render it at once correct and interesting. Amongst the mass of materials which the Editor has searched for these ends, it is possible some few facts may have escaped his notice, but he can confidently assert that not one statement has been put forward which does not rest on sufficient authority ; and, however others may differ from him in opinion on the inferences to be drawn, the data upon which those conclusions rest must remain unimpeached ; and perhaps, when, in a few short years at most, he shall sleep with those who have preceded him as ministers in its collegiate church, this little volume may form the basis of some more interesting and perfect history of a place, of which a distinguished and attractive writer * of the present day says, cc Middleham — -not Windsor, nor Shene, nor Westminster, nor the Tower — seemed the Court of England.^f Although it is the principal design of the present volume to give a brief history of the church and parish of Middleham, from the period that, under the auspices of Richard duke of Gloucester, it was erected into a college and deanery, still it seems desirable, * Sir E. B. Lytton, Bart. + Last of the Barons, vol. ii. p. 160. PREFACE. IX before the editor proceeds with his allotted task, to throw together in this place a few memoranda of its earlier condition. Middleham, or as it is called in Domesday, Medelai,* formed a portion of those extensive possessions which the Conqueror bestowed on his nephew Alan Rufus, earl of Bretagne, first earl of Richmond, and lord of Middleham, after the conquest of England. Alan, who died without issue a.d. 1089, gave the manor and honor of Middleham, with its appurtenances, and various other lands which, in the time of the Confessor, belonged to Ghilpatric, a Dane, to his youngest brother Ribald, whose grandson Robertf built the castle of Middleham. “ Contiguous to a castle of this period/’ says Whitaker, J “ was almost always a church. The village of Middleham had none before; as a member of a parish in the Saxon times, it must have been attached to Wensley. With equal probability, there- fore, we may ascribe to Ribald both the one and the other/’ And in another place § he remarks, 66 All this while ” ( i. e. at the period when Robert de Neville, called the Peacock of the North, || who died previously to the year 1331, was lord of Middleham,) cc we hear nothing of a church at Middleham, nor till the following instrument; but there can be little doubt that it was the work of one of the first lords, who endowed it with an ample glebe, and as * “ The land of earl Alan, Medelai (Middleham), to he taxed five carucates, and there may be three ploughs. Ghile Patrick had a manor there ; Ribald now has it, and it is waste. The whole one mile long and one broad, value in king Edward’s time twenty shillings.” Eawdwen’s (Rev. W.) Translation of Domesday, p. 108. f “ Robertus hie tempore suo fundavit et sedificavit Castrum de Middelham.” Inter Collectiones Dodsworthii in Bibliotheca Harl. See Gale’s Honor of Richmond, Appendix, pp. 233, 234. t Whitaker’s Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 343. § Ibid. p. 332. || Dugdale’s Baronage, vol. i. p. 292. CAMD. SOC. b X PREFACE. usual with the tithes of the town.’ 5 Such is Dr. Whitaker’s state- ment, and the instrument he mentions is given below.* * “ Omnibus hanc cartam indentatam visuris vel audituris Radulphus Comes West - merlandise Dominus de Nevill et Marescallus Anglise salutem in Domino sempiternam. Sciatis nos quandam cartam indentatam Marise de Nevill quondam Dominse de Midilham, antecessoris nostrse, cuidam Domino Johanni Rectori ecclesise de Midilham prsedicta et successoribus suis factam, inspexisse in hsec verba, Universis Christi fidelibus ad quorum notitiam prsesentes literse pervenerint, Maria de Nevill Domina de Middilham salutem in Domino sempiternam. Noverit universitas vestra me in pura viduitate ac ligea potestate mea, concessisse et prsesenti scripto meo cyrographato confirmasse Domino Johanni Rectori ecclesise de Middilham et successoribus suis communiam pasturse per totum annum ad octo boves et duo jumenta, in bosco meo de Middilham qui vocatur Westwode exceptis clausis meis separabilibus in prsedicto bosco existentibus, ubi prsedictus Dominus Johannes et successores sui non solebant habere nisi tantum sex boves et duo jumenta : habendum et tenendum prsedicto Domino Johanni et successoribus suis prsedictam com- muniam pasturse ad octo boves et duo jumenta prsedicta in prsedicto bosco, exceptis duobus clausis in eodem bosco existentibus dummodo permanserint clausa, de me et heredibus meis libere, quiete, ben£ et in pace cum pertinentiis suis imperpetuum ; decimis foeni in prsedictis duobus clausis prsedicto Domino Johanni et successoribus suis in omnibus sibi salvis. Et si contingat quod aliqua averia de prsedictis octo bob us et duobus jumentis prsedicti Domini Johannis vel successorum suorum, in prsedictis duobus clausis pro defectu clausurse aliquo tempore intraverint et absque wardo facto, sine gravamine et reparatione retractentur. Et prsedictus Dominus Johannes pro se et successoribus suis, prsedictse Dominse Marise et hseredibus suis totum jus et clameum communis in prsedictis duobus clausis in bosco prsedicto dummodo clausa permanserint penitus relaxat. Et quam cito prsedicta duo clausa pro non clausis teneantur prsedictis Domino Johanne et successoribus suis, ad statum communis pasturse sex bourn et duorum jumentorum prius habitorum revertantur. In cujus rei testimonium prsesenti scripto cyrographato alternatim sigilla sua apposuerunt. Hiis testibus, Willelmo de Burgo tunc Ballivo Richemundise, et aliis. Datum apud Middilham die Sancti Jacobi Apostoli, anno Domini Millesimo tricentesimo decimo. Quam quidem cartam ac omnia et singula in eadem carta contenta Ricardo de Pykering nunc Rectori Ecclesise de Middilham prsedictse et successoribus suis secundum formam cartse prsedictse indentatse, approbamus, confirmamus et ratificamus tirmiter per prsesentes. In cujus rei testimonium uni parti hujus cartse indentatse, penes prsedictum Ricardum et successores suos remanenti, sigillum nostrum apposuimus ; alteri vero parti penes nos et hseredes nostros remanenti, dictus Ricardus sigillum suum apposuit. Datum apud Raby vicesimo nono die mensis Decembris, Anno Domini Millesimo, quadringentesimo, quinto et regni regis Henrici quarti post conquestum septimo.” — Middleham MSS. PREFACE. XI There are, however, documents in existence in which a church at Middleham is mentioned at a much earlier period than the reign of Henry IV. In the taxation made by authority of pope Nicholas IV. about the year 1291, there is the following entry :* * * § ■ — Antiq. Tax. Nov. Tax. “ Ecclesia de Middelham . £8 0 0 5 0 0” Again in the “ Nonarum Inquisitiones in Curia Scaccarii, temp. Edw. Ill ”+ “ Middelham. Taxatio iiii li. Iidem receperunt de iiij li. de nona ejusdem parochise commissa Ricardo del Parsons, Johanni Generali, Ricardo de Mangeby, et Ricardo de Wayne- brigg, et sic minus taxatione de iiij li. quia iiij. carucae jacent friscae quae si essent cultae nona valuerit Iiij s. iiij c?. ubi Rector solet percipere xij. petras lanae pretii xxxvjs. et xx. agnos pretii vijs. vj d. prout compertum est per sacramentum hominum praedictorum. Summa iiij li” While from the Inquisitions post mortem in the same and the succeeding reigns, the following extracts are subjoined : “ A 0 . 41 Edw. III. Rad’us de Nevill. Midelham advoc’ Ecclesiae.” J “ A°. 12 Ric. II. Joh’es de Nevill de Raby, et Elizabetha uxor ejus. Middelham maner’ cum advoc’ Ecclesiae extent’.” § It was the son of the Sir John de Neville here named, by his former wife Maud, daughter of the Lord Percy, from whom emanated the important instrument already given. * Taxatio Ecclesiastica Anglise et Wallise, auctoritate P. Nicholai IV. circa A,D. 1291. London, 1802, folio, p. 307. See also pp. 327, 337. + Nonarum Inquisitiones, p. 237. Lond. 1807, folio. X Calendarium Inquisitionum post Mortem, vol. ii. p. 282. Lond. 1806, folio. § Ibid. vol. iii. p. 103. Xll PREFACE. This Ralph de Neville, having first won the golden spurs of knighthood, was in the 21st year of Rich. II. created Earl of West- moreland, and subsequently received from Henry IV. a grant of the earldom of Richmond ;* and under him the power and grandeur of his race seems to have attained a high degree of eminence, having died possessed of the castle and lordship of Middleham, f as well as many other extensive territorial possessions. J His widow Joane, daughter of John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, who died Nov. 13, 19 Hen. VI. most undoubtedly possessed, with the castle, the advowson of the church. This is evident from the following record : § — “ Johanna nuper comitissa Westmoreland. Middelham advoc’ Ecelesise. | ^ Middelham Castr’, maner’ et domin’ \ With the lordship and castle, the advowson of the church sub- sequently passed into the hands of the renowned Richard earl of * “ Notwithstanding this grant, Ralph Neville never assumed the title of Earl of Richmond.” Nicolas’s Synopsis of the Peerage, p. 536, from Third Peerage Report, p. 102. >f« “ About the 12th of Ric. II. he obtained the King’s charter for a weekly market every Monday at his manor of Middleham, as also a yearly fair at that place at the feast day of St. Alkeld the Virgin, the patron saint of that place.” X He lies interred under a stately tomb in the church of Staindrop, adjoining to Raby, in the co. Durham. Whitaker says (i. 345), that “ under this earl the power and splendour of the Neviles had attained to a height from which they subsequently declined that 11 he was the last of the Neviles in the right line who was seised of Middleham and of its dependencies,” and that “henceforth we hear no more of the first line of the Neviles at Middleham.” On this latter point Surtees says (Hist, of Durham, iv. 152), “The Yorkshire castles of Middleham and Sheriff Hutton, and many a dependent manor, and many a fair southern lordship, were settled on the issue of the first earl’s second princely alliance.” It must, however, be remembered that the splendour of the second line of Neville, which succeeded to Middleham, greatly surpassed that of the first ; and that the grandson of this earl — the inheritor of this castle and its attendant domains — by his union with the heiress of the house of Warwick, elevated the race of Neville to the highest pitch of magnificence and power. § Calendarium Inquis. post Mort. vol. iv. p. 206. PREFACE. Xlll Warwick, and at length, as w T ill hereafter be shewn, * became eventually vested in Richard duke of Gloucester. Prior however to that period, on the 25th of Jan. in the ninth year of Edw. IV. the king granted licence f to John Cartmell to found a chantry of our Lady in the church of Middleham, to pray for the soul of the founder J and all Christian souls. This chantry, forming the eastern portion of the south aisle, from which it is now separated by rails, as it formerly was by a screen, and extending more than half the entire length of the choir, to which it is united by an arch, filled with a recently erected parclose, seems to have been founded and endowed on the 21st day of July, A 0 . 10 Edw. IV. a few months after the grant of the royal licence. The following interesting particulars relating to it, are extracted at full length from Whitaker’s Riehmondshire : § — “ The Chaunirye of our Ladye in the Paryshe Churche of Myddelham. Robert Ambler, incumbent, of the aige of lxvi. yeres, lerned, of honest conversacion and qualities, having no other promocions but onelye the revenewe of his sayde chauntrye ; also there is one other pryst || in the sayd paryshe at the fynding of the parson there ; the same chauntrye is within the sayd churche, the necessite thereof is to minister sacraments, having ccxxx. howselyng people in the sayde paryshe : there is no lands sold ne alyenated sithe the xxiii. day of November, a 0 , reg. r. nuper Hen. VIII. xxxvii. * See Introd. infra, pp. 1. 4. + “ Pro Cantar. Joh’is ChatLmele de Midiham.” Middleham MSS. See also Calen- darium Rot. Pat. (in Turre Londinensi), p. 315. X “ There was a chantry here, at the altar of St. Mary, for the soul of John Cartmell, sometime rector of this church.” Lawton’s Collections, vol. ii. p. 568. § Vol. i. p. 341. || There can be little doubt that this “ one other pryst ” here alluded to was the minis- ter for divine services and offices of whom mention will be found in the Introduction, p. 29. XIV PREFACE. The yerely value of the same as shall appere by the particlers of the same ....... vi£. In reprisis yerely going furthe of the same . . . xiis. And so remaneth clere ..... cviiis. Goods, ornaments, and plate pertening to the same, as apperith by in- ventory, viz., goods ...... plate xiii ounces, parcell gilte. The Chauntrye of our Ladye in the Parysshe Churche of Myddelham. Robert Ambler, incumbent, of the foundacion of John Cartemele, to th’entent to praye for the soule of the founder and all christen soules, and to helpe to do dyvine servyce in the sayde churche, and to kepe one yerely obyte to the charge of xiii^. iiiic?. as apperyth by foundacion dated xxi. die Junii, Anno reg. R. E. 4. decimo. The same is wythyn the said church, and the necessitye is to pray for the soule of the founder, and all christen soules, and to do dyvyne servyce in the sayde churche ; and the same is observed and kepte accordinglye. There is no lands or tenementes, solde, alienated, put awey, or entry d into sithens the statute. Goodes, ornaments, and plate perteynyng to the same chauntrye as ap- peryth by inventory, that is to seye, goodes valued at xxiiiis. ii d. oh. and plate xlviiis. Goodes xxiiii.s. ii d. Plate ..... xlviiis. Firste, a certen yerely rent of vi£. comyng out of the late monasterye of Seynt Agatha,* paid by the late lorde Scrope, a fermor of the said late monasterye, comying forth of the landes and tenementes in Hud- deswell, Tunstall, and Scotton vi l. wherof Pa iable yerely to the kinges majestie for the tenthes xiis. And so remayneth clere cviiis.” * “Cantaria de Mydleham, Robertus Anmer incumbens. Benariis numeratis de monasterio sanctse Agathse £\i Quae valet clare. X ma pars inde - xij ” Valor Ecclesiasticus, vol. v. p. 249. PREFACE. XV But this was not the only religious foundation then existing ; there was another, although not within the church, yet within the parish of Middleham. Of this not a vestige now remains, nor did there even in Dugdale’s day ; for in speaking of the college, he adds,* “ All that we know of an hospital here is from Leland, who in his Itinerary says there is at the est end of Middleham a little hospital, with a chapel of Jesus.” Some fields, however, not far from the eastern extremity of the town, retain to the pre- sent day the name of ee Chapel-fields,” the only existing memorial of its desecration. Doubtless chantry, hospital, and chapel all sank beneath the rapacious hand of him who styled himself “ Fidei Defensor.” And their places are now worthily supplied by the Union workhouse, and two barn-like conventicles ! “ Hei ! quantum mutatus ab illo.” “ Proh ! pudor inversique mores.” The venerable church, however, still rears its embattled tower on the summit of a gentle eminence overlooking the beautiful and verdant valley of the Yore, and bearing though it does the weather- stain of ages, seems capable of enduring for centuries yet to come. Long may its beautiful peal of bells f fling their sounds of melody abroad, inviting ever and anon those who hear them, to worship within the walls of that hallowed fane, where our pure branch of the holy catholic church offers to Almighty God the daily sacrifice of prayer and praise ! * Monasticon, vol. vi. p. 781. *j- There were formerly but three bells in the tower. The present excellent peal of six was (a.d. 1824), with all the contingent expenses, the munificent gift to the parish of Middleham of the late John Breare, Esq. of Middleham Hall, now represented by his nephew and successor Christopher Topham, Esq. xvi PREFACE. Dr. Whitaker,* speaking of this structure, remarks that a of the original fabric of the church scarcely a vestige remains, save a few fragments in the tower. The present building is plain and handsome, of rather late Gothic, and not very ample dimensions ; but it contains some very curious objects and matters of difficult speculation.” Through the kindness, however, of an eminent archseologist, who has in the most handsome manner placed his beautiful and erudite MS. journal at the disposal of the Editor, he is enabled to add the following valuable and interesting details of the sacred edifice : — “ When Richard III. possessed the castle, he raised the rectory to a deanery, and intended to build a college, t but his purpose was frustrated by death. The church was never rebuilt in the usual cruciform collegiate shape ; but is of the ordinary form, with a western tower. The south aisle extends more than half way along the choir, J and there is an original vestry on the north side. “ The only portion of the present church which can be decisively pronounced Norman is a fragment of a zig-zagged moulding, which has been round either a door or a window, and is now inserted high up in the exterior of the north aisle. This stone is quite * Richmondshire, i. 333. f A field at no great distance from the church still bears the name of Foundation Close, where it is said the foundations of the college had actually been laid at the period of Richard’s premature decease. “ If this were intended for the collegiate building,” remarks Whitaker, i. 338, “ and the church were meant to remain where it was, however convenient such an arrangement would have been for the castle and town, it must have been very incommodious to the dean and canons. Yet there are such instances: the college of Manchester is at a considerable distance from the collegiate church, and that of Kirk-Oswald still farther, but neither so remote as the Foundation Field from the church of Middleham.” X The eastern portion joining the choir is the ancient chantry. PREFACE. X Vll enough to shew how erroneous Whitaker was, when he asserted there were no remains of a church built by the Norman lords.* c * It will be perceived on a careful examination that there are abundant evidences of the shell of the present building being early-English, for, though the mouldings are meagre and deficient, still some exist which are decisive on the point. The tow r er arch, the arches of the nave, and the main walls of the choir, are all very clearly early-English. The tower arch dies into the walls ; its mouldings, as well as those of the other arches, are merely chamfered; and, if that were the only feature to judge by, it would be vain to assign any particular date to these portions, but the abacus of the capitals in the nave is fortunately very decidedly early-English in its character. The jambs of the doorway in the south aisle of the nave are also very clearly early-English, with somewhat later mouldings than the other portions of this style : the arch has been inserted. The height of the early-English chancel appears from the north side, where the corbel-table which was under the parapet is perfect the whole length. The east end is flanked by early-English buttresses, and there is another in the centre. Beneath the present east window are tw'o low plain square windows (now blocked up), which have been considered by some to be the windows of a former crypt ; but from careful measure- ment I conceive that this is quite impossible, and that the arrange- ment of the east end consisted of four lights, two above other two, similar to the plan to be seen in the chancel and transepts of the church of Darlington. “ In the fourteenth century several alterations in the Decorated style, then prevalent, were made. The end windows of the north * Vol. i. p. 343. CAMD. SOC. C XV111 PREFACE. and south aisles, the nave clerestory, the sacristy on the north of the choir, the two square windows above the early-English corbel- table before referred to, and the great east window (which is re- markable as having four lights), of flowing tracery, are of this date. “ The Perpendicular additions consist of the western tower (which is very good), the side windows of the north and south aisles (very late), and the porch. cc Of the Debased style are the remains of the stalls, cut up and inserted in the modern pews. “ Such is a brief history of the architecture of Middleham col- legiate church : let us now proceed to its various ornaments, not noticed in the above sketch. “ In the tower about half way up is a stone fire-place,* which appears to be of very late date, and is partly composed of ancient tomb-stones. One has an elaborate cross, sword, and wand sculp- tured on it; another, a part of a cross and keys ; and a third, with the base of a cross and sword, the inscription — “ jft$£00A!tt'” There is also part of a sculptured tomb-stone, with a base of a cross, built into the lower part of the tower. In a recent clearing of the formerly blocked tower-arch, were taken out a stone with a cross patee, and also part of a figure, which has either been an image or a sepulchral effigy. ei In the western part of the nave stands the font— a modern circular basin, with a good, though plain, florid cover, curiously painted. The roof has been underdrawn within the last century. There are marks of screens across the whole church, on the two piers of the nave, first from the east ; and when the rood-screen * “ The belfry chamber has a fire-place, about which are wrought up several fragments of the first church. A fragment of one grave-stone in particular has cut upon it two keys, emblems of the office of some ancient constable of the castle.” Whitaker, Richm. i. 334. PREFACE. XIX was also remaining, this part of the nave must have possessed a peculiarly gorgeous and imposing appearance. ee At the south of these two piers formerly stood an altar-tomb, supposed to be that of St. Alkelda, on which payments of money were required to be made (as on the tomb of John Haxby, in York Cathedral ) ; this remained within the memory of man. The pulpit now stands nearly on the same spot. a The choir is occupied by some new stalls for the canons, in lieu of the original ones demolished by a former dean.* There is under the altar- steps a portion of a brass inscription, nearly obliterated ; a line seems to be hid by the steps, tjie part seen appears to be — “ $tc jacet magt0t' $011130 hat’ ortums s 5 s 5 # The corner pieces of brass are all lost. A stone within the altar- rails bears marks of a black letter inscription, but it is completely illegible: Along the south wall of the choir is a large rude recess cut out, which probably had a seat and served as the sedilia ; at the east end of it is a piscina (lately opened out), in an unusual position. The whole of the elevation on which the communion table stands is modern. The roof of the choir is described as having been of black oak, pannelled, but is unfortunately under- drawn, similarly to the rest of the church ; there are vestiges of a cross on the choir gable. ee North Aisle. — In the tops of the side windows are old tomb- stones cut up, one has a good early wheel-cross and chalice ; the west window is a small square one grated. “ In the east window of the south aisle are five good heads in the stained-glass fragments; one a peculiarly fine one, nimbed. * See Introd. infra, p. 33. XX PREFACE. but no connected subject is now to be discovered. The passion of St. Adkelda was depicted here, glowing “ in colours richly dight/’ and her own figure yet remains, with a napkin twisted round her neck. This east window, near which is a candle- bracket, is in that part which is comprised in the choir portion of the church ; and here was the chantry of our Blessed Lady, founded by John Cartmele. At the extreme west end of this aisle is placed upright a fine slab, which formerly rested on four pillars, in another part of the church.* From the legend it must have come from Jervaulx Abbey, but when is not recorded; it reads — SDrate. pro. aVa. tiompm. IRo&mi. ^orneton. afsbat’. fnu . Uorni. 3[orctmufi0. btoimi Jk’tsi. Between each word are thorn leaves, at the bottom of the stone more than usual ; the diapering of the centre is also composed of thorn leaves, which, with a tun , form a rebus on the name. Out of the tun springs a pastoral staff, behind which is a mitre, and at the sides the initials “ ft. C*” On two shields at the top, hung by bands, are devices, one the usual monogram — — the other an M with spear and sponge. The whole is in good preservation. “ There is nothing remarkable about the sacristy. In the porch there is a three-foiled niche above the outer door-way, and a mutilated bracket in the north-east corner of the porch itself. * “ A huge flat stone, lately removed from the neighbourhood of the pulpit, which is really the tomb of Robert Thornton, 22nd abbat of Jervaulx.” [a. d. 1510.] “ What account can be given of the removal of. so massy a stone, and of its being found in a parish church wholly unconnected with the abbey ? It is certain Thornton had not long been dead at the Dissolution ; and, if he were a native of Middleham, and had friends surviving there, it is not improbable that his remains and his gravestone were removed together on that event to a situation where they might be protected, and where he might thenceforward sleep among his friends.” Whitaker’s Riehmondshire, i. 334. GRAVESTONE OF ROBERT THORNETON, THE 22l) ABBOT OF JERVAULX. PREFACE. XXI “ At the deanery is a gothic door bearing Decorated mouldings ; it perhaps belonged to a rectory house converted into the deanery, (as was the vicarage at Darlington) ; in the wall of an adjoining out-house, attached to the same, is a curious tomb-stone, only 1 foot 9 inches long, with two wheel-crosses of unusual design, which probably commemorated two children. “ Let into the rear of a dwelling, opposite the principal front of the castle, are also two mutilated sculptures ; one a pheasant or peacock, the other apparently a stone rood, with the Saviour extended on the cross between St. Mary and St. John, or perhaps the two Marys. ^ In a volume like this, professedly devoted to ecclesiastical mat- ters, it may seem for a moment irrelevant to introduce any details merely of a secular nature; yet, associated as the castle of Mid- dleham was with both the earlier and later fortunes of its church, it is impossible to pass it over altogether unnoticed. It has been already observed that the massive and gloomy Keep, forming the original pile, and still surviving the lapse of centuries, was the work of Robert Fitz-Randolph, third lord of Middleham. From him it passed in regular succession to his lineal descendants, male and female, until it came into the hands of king Henry VI. on the forfeiture of Richard Neville earl of Salisbury.* After that * Richard Neville, earl of Salisbury, was the eldest son of Ralph Neville, earl of West- moreland, K.G. by his second wife Joane, daughter of John of Gaunt. From marrying Alice, the daughter and heir of Thomas de Montacute, earl of Salisbury, K.G. he was created earl of Salisbury, and was appointed lord great chamberlain of England, 39 Hen. VI. but was beheaded at York shortly afterwards. His eldest son Richard, K.G. acquired the earldom of Warwick by marrying Anne, sister and heir to Henry duke of Warwick, and is celebrated in the history of England as the “ King- maker,” from his great influence and power. Testamenta Vetusta, p. 287 ; Halsted’s Rich. III. i. 115, 116’. XXII PREFACE. event the castle, with an annuity of 100 marks accruing from certain manors in Wensleydale, was granted by the king (a 0 38 Hen. VI.) to sir John Neville (brother to Ralph first earl of West- moreland, and uncle to the earl of Salisbury) as constable for life, but the feudal fortress, with all its vast domains, manors, and retainers, on the accession of Edward IV. reverted to its rightful heir, the renowned Richard earl of Salisbury and Warwick; and after his untimely death, at the battle of Barnet, was allotted to Richard duke of Gloucester, who had married the lady Anne Neville, Warwick’s younger daughter. “ Some interesting scenes of English history have taken place in and around this castle. Hence the earl of Salisbury marched through Craven at the head of 4,000 Richmondshire men to the battle of Bloreheath. Here, too, according to Stow, the bastard Falconbridge was beheaded, a.d. 1471. On a neighbouring plain, Edward IV. having been committed to the charge of archbishop George Neville, at Middleham, being indulged with the privilege of hunting, and having probably bribed his keepers, escaped on a fleet horse to York, and thence to Lancaster, where he resumed the government. Here Edward, son of Richard III. was born ; and here the father, green in years but old in craft and cruelty, amidst the sports of the field or the appearances of devotion, meditated no doubt some of those tragedies which time and pre- judice have left so mysterious.” * * Whitaker’s Richmondshire, i. 348. Modern research has, however, considerably modified these statements. It has been discovered from the Foedera, that Edward IV. while said to be the prisoner of archbishop Neville, was at full liberty, and doing acts of regal power: while the biographer of Richard III. if she has not completely removed from Ms character every stain, has at least adduced sufficient evidence to create serious doubts of his alleged crimes in every reflecting mind. PREFACE. XXII With respect to the edifice itself very few particulars can be given.* The small remains of this once magnificent castle stand on the south side of the town. It consists of an outwork fortified with four towers, inclosing a body or keep. This envelope is in figure a right-angled parallelogram of 210 feet by 175 ; its greatest length running north and south, and each of its sides forming one of the cardinal points of the compass. As a specimen of architecture Middleham is an unique but not a happy work. The Norman keep, the fortress of the first lords, not being sufficient for the vast trains and princely habits of the Nevilles, was inclosed by a com- plete quadrangle, which almost entirely darkened what was dark enough before, and the first structure now stands completely insu- lated in the centre of a later work. This building, which is much higher than the outwork, is of a shape similar to it. The main building is unequally divided by a wall which runs from north to south, and here still remain the broken stairs. The entrance into this castle was by a very strong arched gate- way on the north side. The remnants of a moat f now appear on the south and east ; but the ditch is daily filling up with weeds and rubbish : the leaden pipes, for the conveyance of water, were taken up within the memory of the mother of a person now living. In 1663 it appears as if the castle was occupied by * The following memorials of the castle and town have been principally collected from Whitaker’s Richmondshire, i. 342 ; Maude’s Wensleydale, pp. 79, 80 ; White’s History of the North Riding of Yorkshire, pp. 617, 618 ; and the Gentleman’s Magazine, lxxxiv. part ii. p. 318. f Since the above was written the moat is completely filled up, and not a trace of it now remains. This has been done within the last twenty years. CAMD. SOC. d XXIV PREFACE. lord Loftus,* * * § who probably held it by lease from the crown, where the property seems to be.f The duke of Leeds holds the sinecure office of “ Governor of Middleham Castle and, as chief bailiff of Richmondshire, he holds here a court baron and view of frank pledge for suits under 405 . As it is, — majestic in decay, — Middleham Castle is the noblest work of man in the county of Richmond, Without any natural strength, except that of standing upon a little elevated rock, the views up and down Wen sley dale are delightful ; but at a time when little gratification was taken in by the eye, the idea of property would supersede the feelings of taste, and the Nevilles would survey with pleasure the ample domains around them, not because they were picturesque or beautiful, but because they were their own. A word on the town itself ere this preface draws to a close. Middleham is situated on a gentle rising ground in the most fertile and open part of Wensleydale, a short distance from the south bank of the river Yore, in the wapentake of Hangwest, and is a small but ancient and well-built market town, containing several neat mansions occupied by respectable families.J As a place of trade it never had any high interest ; but on the adjacent moor, which has long been famed as a school of the turf, many celebrated racers have been trained. § With the exception of the church and * See Introduction, infra , p. 26. •f* “ Whether the lord of the manor is really owner of the castle does not seem very certain ; at all events the Darcys, earls of Holderness, have long held the constableship of the castle by grant from the crown, in consequence of which that office, a mere name, is now vested in his grace the duke of Leeds.” Whitaker’s Richmondshire, i. 349. £ The population of Middleham, according to Whitaker (i. 349), was, in 1811, 714 : by the last census, taken in 1841, it had increased to 930. § The following passage from a letter written in 1537 shews in what estimation this district was then held for the breed of horses : — “ The king’s highness (Henry VIII.) is at PREFACE. XXV castle, it does not possess many objects of interest. In the market place there is an ancient cross, and in the upper part of the town is a curious flight of double steps, with a recumbent figure on one side : this is now so mutilated as almost to baffle inquiry; but it has been suggested by an antiquarian friend that it might represent the bear, a portion of the cognizance of the earl of Warwick. With greater probability, however, it may be assumed as the emblem of the silver boar, which, it is well known, was the pecu- liar badge of Richard duke of Gloucester. This surmise is borne out by the circumstance of that portion of the town still retaining the name of “ the Swine Market ; 5 ’ and it has been stated by some of the older inhabitants that, in their earlier days, the figure, then in tolerable preservation, was a boar.* Middleham still contains one or two Tudor houses ; but within the last few years several of the most ancient edifices have been pulled down. Its neighbourhood, however, is rich not alone in objects of anti- quarian and historic lore, but also in the beauty and richness of its natural scenery ; and possessing, as it does, most comfortable accommodation for the tourist, seems a spot well adapted, from its central situation, for a resting-place to the lover of the one or the great charge with his studs of mares at Thornborough and other places, which are fine grounds ; and I think that at Jervaulx and in the granges incident, with the help of their great large commons, the king’s highness by good overseers should have there the most best pasture that should be in England, hard and sound of kind. For assuredly the breed of Jervaulx for horses was the tried breed of the north ; the stallions and mares so well sorted that I think in no realm should we find the like to them, for there is high and large grounds for the summer, and low grounds to serve them.” * This figure bears a strong resemblance, even in its present dilapidated condition, to the couchant boar on which Richard III. and his son Edward Prince of Wales are repre- sented as standing in an engraving, copied from a MS. in the College of Arms, and pre- fixed to the second volume of Halsted’s Richard III. xxvi PREFACE. admirer of the other : while he who fortunately is blessed with a taste for both may revel for days on the interesting and attractive objects in its vicinity. Westward are the yet perfect remains of Bolton Castle, where the lovely and hapless Mary Stuart was erst a prisoner in the keeping of the lordly Scrope ; and still the spot is pointed out, bearing the name of the Queers Gap, where this victim of misfortune was recaptured when endeavouring to escape from her prison home. Westward, also, are the beautiful church of Wensley, the recently discovered ruins of a preceptory of Knights Templars, and the far-famed and romantic Aysgarth Force, with the adjacent church, each of which will amply repay a visit. North is the magnificent natural terrace known by the name of Leyburn Shawl ; and within a drive Richmond Castle, with its lofty and massive keep, as fresh and sharply chiseled as when, seven hundred years ago, earl Conan, laying its foundation upon the rocky bank of the Swale, reared that huge square tower, the walls of which, with their pinnacled turrets, have braved the dilapi- dating hand of time, and retain at this day their original dimensions and stability. South are the remnants of Coverliam Abbey, where some of Middiehanfis earliest lords lie entombed ; and in a sequestered spot, close by the romantic bed of the Cover, the little known, but curious fragments of St. Simon’s chapel and holy well. While eastward are the extensive and well kept ruins of the once splendid abbey of Jervaulx ; and further still, the castle and church of Tanfield, where lie enshrined the renowned lords Marmion, each under his marble sepulchre. These for the antiquary alone ; but for him who loves to read from Nature’s book, and PREFACE. xxvii delights in the works of his Creator, all Wensleydale abounds with the picturesque and the beautiful. There are lofty dells and heath-clad mountains— there are hanging woods and precipitous rocks ; rivers winding, like the beauteous Yore, through the rich and verdant meadows which gird its margin ; or, as the Cover, foaming and tearing its way over rocks and stones, far, far beneath the feet of him who stands on the summit of its precipitous and wood-bound banks. But here the editor must pause, nor indulge longer in expatiat- ing on those most interesting subjects which constitute his chiefest sources of amusement, and which have contributed to solace and to cheer him in many a sad hour of solitude and sorrow. In conclusion,* he cannot close this preface without returning his sincere thanks to those friends who have aided him in his undertaking ; among the many whom he could name, they are principally due to Miss C. A. Halsted, the biographer of Richard III.f who, even before he had the pleasure of her personal acquaintance, generously placed her valuable MS. collections at his disposal. He is also deeply indebted to the Rev. G. C. Tomlinson, F.R.S., the incumbent of Coverham, not merely for perusing the transcript * It ought not to be passed over without notice, that, much to the credit of the successive deans and registrars of Middleham — in whose custody they are deposited — the many important documents, comprising royal and ecclesiastical licences, grants, and charters (duplicates of which are to be found in the various state-paper offices in London), together with the other muniments belonging to this deanery, have been kept with the most scrupulous care, and are at the present day in most excellent preservation, although extending over a period of nearly 450 years ! f “ Richard III. as Duke of Gloucester and King of England.” 2 vols. 8vo. Longmans and Co. 1844. A work abounding in deep research and valuable information, however opinions may differ on the conclusions at which the author has arrived. XXVlll PREFACE. of his MS., but also for much important local information, and for the use of several rare and valuable works ; to W. G. J. Barker, Esq., of Harmby, for his ready aid in collating ancient documents, and furnishing him with extracts from his notes, col- lected with reference to an intended work on the antiquities of Wensleydale; and to William Hylton Longstaffe, Esq., of Norton, the use of whose Archeeological Journal has already been grate- fully acknowledged. To these, and to the authorities of the British Museum, from whom he experienced every facility in the prosecution of his researches, he desires to return those acknowledgements which are so justly due. The editor trusts that the professional avocations which neces- sarily caused his absence from London during the time that this book was passing through the press will be accepted as an apology for any casual inaccuracies which may be discovered. Owing, however, to the great kindness of the Messrs. Nichols, who are ever ready and desirous to promote the objects of the Camden Society, these, it is hoped, will be found but few and of little consequence ; and he sends forth this volume to that society with an earnest wish that it may prove, albeit a small, yet not an unacceptable addition to the ecclesiastical annals of our country. W. A. The Deanery, Middleham, January 1 , 1847 . XXIX THE RECTORS OF MIDDLEHAM BEFORE ITS ERECTION INTO A COLLEGIATE CHURCH. Temp. Institut. Reetores. Patroni. Yacat. 26 Apr. 1372 D’ns. Reginaldus de Thorp Arch, Cap. /D’ns. Nevill de | Raby jjoh’es D’ns. de v Raby 17 July, 1378 M r . Ric. de Yeddingham idem p’ resig. D’ns. Joh. Alwent, Cap. Rad. Com. W’land p’ resig. 23 Oct. 1399 D’ns. Ric. de Pykering, Cl. idem D’ns. Will. Reson p’ mort. 2 Mar. 1426 D’ns. Petr, Fryston, Pbr. Joh’ Com tissa W’land p’ resig. 22 Sep. 1430 D’ns. Robt. Knayton,Cap. eadem p’ resig. 15 Dec. 1434 D’ns. Joh. Cartmell, Cap. eadem p’ resig. 10 Dec. 1437 D’ns. Joh. Strangland, eadem Pbr. D‘ns. Will. Beverley p’ prom. Torre's Peculiars, p. 1350. INTRODUCTION. Former publications * of the Camden Society have brought before our notice Richard Duke of Gloucester, as continually engaged in the intrigues of a court or the storms of civil war, while for four centuries both his person and character have been the theme of almost universal vituperation. Into these subjects it is not the province of the editor of the present volume to enter ; and, in truth, there is now the less occasion for it, since the volumes of Miss Halsted have appeared in the field of literature. This talented and zealous writer has adduced a host of authorities, apparently proving that his personal deformity existed but in the libels of an opposing faction, perpetuated in the pages of the poet and the novelist; while at the same time her researches seem to throw such light over the darker shades in his chequered career, as to induce the strongest presumption that he was not guilty of, or accessory to, those startling crimes which have been charged to his account. The limits, however, of the brief introduction allotted to this work, compel us to turn our attention from scenes of battle and of blood to other, and to us more interesting portions of his history. When, on the partition f of Warwick’s vast domains between the sister heiresses, the lordship and manor of Middleham, with its ancestral castle, became the fair heritage of Gloucester in * Historie of the Arrival of Edward IV. ; Wark worth’s Chronicle ; and Polydore Vergil ; being Nos. I. X. and XXVIII. of the Camden Society’s publications. f A.D. 1473. CAMD. SOC. B 2 INTRODUCTION. right of his wife,* the Lady Anne Neville, it assumed an extra- ordinary interest in his eyes. It may have been the beauty and fertility of the region in which it lay, still rendering Wensleydale an object of attraction to the lover of God’s handiworks, — it mav have been the reminiscences f of his earlier days, when within its feudal walls he first learnt the art of war from the princely War- wick, or whispered the soft breathings of affection into the ear of his gentle daughter : it may have been all or any of these ; but certain it is, that, though the pomp and circumstance of state, or the high duties of his vice-regal station, may have compelled him the while to unfurl his banner, and reside within the time-worn walls of Pontefract, J yet ever and anon did he escape from these to Middleham, ce the centre and the home of his domestic affec- tions. 55 Here then it was that the royal Gloucester resolved to establish a foundation, which might for ever attest his reverence for the honour and glory of God. To quote the language of that inde- fatigable historian § to whom we have already alluded, “ It w T as not alone the restoration of castles and strongholds that occupied Gloucester’s attention, and called forth his munificence ; to his honour let it be recorded, that religion, || and the worship of God * Halsted’s Richard III. vol. i. p. 298. f Strickland’s Queens of England, vol. iii. pp. 432, 433. X Richard Duke of Gloucester, made high constable of England 29 Feb. 1472, resided at Pontefract as chief seneschal of the king’s duchy of Lancaster in the north parts. — Plumpton Correspondence, p. 26, note. § Halsted’s Richard III. vol. i. pp. 300, 301. || The Harleian Collection contains a memorable instance of Richard’s horror of sacrilege in a letter, “ whereby the king (calling to remembraunce the dreadfulle sentence of the churche of God, yeven ayenst alle those personnes which wilfully attempt to usurp unto themselffes, ayenst good conscience, possessions or other things of right belonging to God and his said churche, and the gret perille of soule whiche may ensue by the same), commands that 20 acres and more of pasture within the parke of Pountfret, which was taken from the priour and convent of Pountfreit about the 10th yere of K. Edw. the IYtli, INTRODUCTION. 3 in temples consecrated to his service, was fully as much the object of his active zeal and attention as the repair of those defensive fabrics that suited his warlike temperament. Whitaker states, in his most interesting History of Richmondshire, c that that county abounds with memorials of this princess bounty to charities and religious-houses/ 4 He seems, 5 adds this able writer, 6 to have divided his residence for a considerable time between his castle here (Middleham), and that of Skipton. He bestoweth liberally on the monks of Coverham* and the parish of Skipton, for the repair of their respective churches : 5 but under the walls of his own castle, his favourite Middleham, he meditated greater things, and greater things he did indeed accomplish. 55 During Gloucester 5 s sojourn in the metropolis, and even amid the splendour of that “ festive scene, which had induced his visit to the court of Edward IV., 55 the solemnization of the marriage of his infant nephew the Duke of York with the heiress of the house of Norfolk, the Lady Anne Mowbray, he seems to have turned his attention to the project which had long occupied his mind, of amplifying the parish church of Middleham, by founding and incorporating there a college for a dean and six secular priests. The royal wedding occurred on the 15th of January, 1477; and on the 21st day of February, in the same year, Richard’s exertions were crowned with success ; and “ a licence 55 was granted by King Edward, ce for erecting the church of Middleham into a college. 55 t be restored unto them. Yoven the 2d day of Octobre, an. primo.” MSS. Harl. 433, fol. 121. — See also Miss Halsted’s admirable remarks on this document, Richard III. vol. ii. pp. 174, 175. * Gloucester obtained, in 1475, the reversion of the manor of Coverdale (vide Rot. Par.)* a district in close local connexion with the Middleham domain. + Middleham Charters, Appendix A. 4 INTRODUCTION, The advowson of the parish church and rectory of Middleham was already vested in the duke in right of his heiress wife ; but, as the expense of maintaining the six chaplains, four clerks, clerk sacristane, and choristers, of whom the foundation was to consist, must necessarily have fallen heavily upon the rector, he endea- voured to provide a remedy by procuring the insertion of a clause in the royal licence, which empowered the new corporation to acquire lands of the value of two hundred marks yearly, the statute of mortmain, or any other statute, act, or ordinance to the contrary thereof notwithstanding. Armed with this important document, the princely founder proceeded to seek the sanction on his undertaking of one of the highest dignitaries within the realm of England. Middleham was then not merely within the province, but actually in the archdiocese of York;* Chester and Ripon, within each of which it has since successively been locally situate, were neither of them in that day episcopal sees ; and the archi epis- copal throne was filled by Laurence Booth.f To him therefore * Chester was erected into a see on the dissolution of the monasteries temp. Henry VIII., and Ripon was restored in the reign of William IV., on the union of the bishoprics of Gloucester and Bristol, a.d. 1836. “ He had risen by merit from obscurity. He studied at Cambridge, where he gained great distinction for his proficiency in literature, law, and divinity. While still a young man he was elected head of his house, and chancellor of that university. In 1457 he was made Bishop of Durham, while Henry VI. was nominally king, but under the influence of the Yorkists, to whom he continued steadily attached. In his old age he was selected to fill the office of Lord Chancellor. His appointment turned out a great failure — 'he was accordingly dismissed from the office of chancellor. To console him, he was soon after translated from Durham to York. He died, after having quietly presided over this province between three and four years ; during which time, abandoning politics, he exclu- sively confined himself to his spiritual duties.” — Campbell’s Lives of the Lord Chancellors, vol. i. pp. 391 et seq. “ Laurence Booth, Archdeacon of Richmond, succeeded Robert Neville (as Bishop of Durham), and was consecrated the 15th September, 1457. He was master of Pembroke Hall, which he kept till he died ; Chancellor of Cambridge, and Lord Chancellor of INTRODUCTION. 5 Richard naturally addressed himself for the confirmation of what had been already done ; aware that, without the approval of holy mother church, every arrangement which already had been or thereafter might be made must fall to the ground. From this illustrious prelate the pious designs of the royal founder expe- rienced the same facilities which they had already met with in the quarter to which he had first applied. The archbishop, taking the matter into his grave consideration, proceeded, as a prelimi- nary step, to issue his commission,* bearing date, from his manor of Soutlrwell, the 6th day of August, 1478, and the second year of his translation, to Robert Bothe, Doctor of Laws, Dean of York, William Poteman, Archdeacon of Cleveland, Henry Gillowe, Sub-dean, and Thomas Barow, Canon of York, to convoke the Archdeacon of Richmond, or his procurator, especially, and all others generally, to the said church of Middleham or to some other fit and convenient place, on a certain day appointed ; and the said parish church to erect into a college ; to make due inquiry into the profits of the same ; and to appoint a certain number of chap- lains and other ministers, providing for the governance of the same and the cure of the parishioners. At this period, the parish church of Middleham was a rectory with cure of souls, in the diocese of York, and archdeaconry of Richmond, of which the advow T son (as we have already stated) was vested in the Duke of Gloucester, and the rector who then filled the benefice was William Beverley. England in 1473. He built the college gates at Auckland, with some adjoining edifices, on both sides of the way, at his own expense. After he had been Bishop of Durham about twenty years, he was translated to York, and was buried in Cawood church near that city.” — Sanderson’s Description of the County of Durham, p. 78. * Middleham Charters, Appendix B. 6 INTRODUCTIONS To him therefore (inasmuch as the consent of the incumbent was indispensably necessary to so great a change) Richard, on his return from the metropolis, immediately applied to sanction his projected college. This sanction was at once and in the most cordial manner granted by Beverley, who doubtless had already been in those habits of familiar intercourse with the royal duke to which his holy office would admit him. The consent of Wil- liam Beverley was conveyed in a document * displaying evident marks of having been prepared with the greatest skill and caution, and bearing date the twentieth day of January, 1478, only four days subsequent to an application made by Gloucester to the Par- liament f then assembled in the painted chamber, Westminster, for permission to alienate for the benefit of his college the advowson of certain churches, which was granted. So far thenhis wishes were already carried out; but before the holy design could be completed there was another interest to be con- sulted, another assent to be gained, and that was the assent of the Archdeacon of Richmond,! a dignitary of very considerable power and influence within his archdeaconry, and whose jurisdiction, in consequence of his frequent residence at the Papal Court, was exercised by his commissary. Gloucester, whose munificence to the Church had been so well proved, would naturally experience but little difficulty in obtaining the ready consent of both these parties, and accordingly we find, on the same day on which Wil- liam Beverley had resigned his rights as rector, an instrument was executed, conveying the consent of Doctor Thomas Pearson, Vicar General of the Archdeacon of Richmond, to the erecting of the church of Middleham into a college, until the sanction of the Middleham Charters, Appendix C. See Gale’s Honor of Richmond, Appendix, p. 65. f Rot. Pari. vol. vi. p. 172. INTRODUCTION. 7 archdeacon * himself could be procured, which, as we shall here- after see, was most elaborately conveyed by a future deed. All these preliminary assents having been thus satisfactorily obtained, and the documents conveying them duly executed, and laid before the above named commissioners, they in compliance with the directions of Archbishop Booth, who was at once ordinary and metropolitan, proceeded with the matters which were entrusted to their care ; and having cited and convoked the archdeacon of Richmond, or his procurator, and Master William Beverley, the rector, especially, and all others generally, on the 29th day of January, 1478, f they assembled in the parish church of Middleham, and, finding that all proceedings connected with the royal founda- tion had been rightly and canonically performed, did then and there, in full form of law, with the sanction of all parties inter- ested therein, and before divers witnesses, erect the same into a collegiate church, and decree that it should be so held and esteemed for ever; and William Beverley became the first Dean. The princely founder, having thus far seen his wishes advanced towards a successful completion, neglected not, amid the ever varying duties of his high and important station, the concerns of his new college ; and accordingly we find that on the 4tli day of July, in the 18th year of Edward IV. and within a brief period after the process of its erection had taken place, statutes were promulgated for the proper government of its various members and officers ; statutes drawn up with the most consummate care and judgement, and bearing evident marks of the powerful mind which influenced the entire arrangements of the college. * The archdeaconry of Richmond was at this time filled by that learned man, Doctor John Sherwood, who was subsequently appointed, in the year 1483, to the see of Durham on the decease of Bishop Dudley. The archdeacon had been sent embassador into Italy, where he collected many great Greek books. He held the see nine years, and died 1494. Sanderson’s Description of Durham, p. 79. + Middleham MSS. Appendix D. 8 INTRODUCTION. By these statutes * the principal place and stall on the right side of the choir, called “ Our Lady’s ” stall, is assigned to the dean, Sir William Beverley. The principal place and stall on the left side, called “ Saint George’s ” stall, to the first priest, Sir Lawrence Evmer. The next stall to the dean on the right side, called ee Saint Ca- tharine’s ” stall, to the second priest. Sir William Symson. The second stall on the left side, called 66 Saint Ninian’s” stall, to the third priest. Sir Richard Cutler. The third stall on the right side, called “ Saint Cuthbert’s ” stall, to the fourth priest, Sir William Burntyait.t The third stall on the left side, called “ Saint Anthony’s ” stall, to the fifth priest, Sir Henry Lonerhead. The fourth stall on the right side, called “ Saint Barbara’s” stall, to the sixth priest. Sir John Bell. To two of the clerks, stalls on the right side, and to the other two clerks, and to the clerk sacristan, called the minister for divine services and offices, stalls on the left side. And to the six choristers pews or places at the assignation of the said dean. These statutes, thus carefully drawn up, and still regulating the affairs of the college, were next submitted for approval and con- firmation to the highest authorities in church and state ; of this we have incontestible evidence in a most important document, J to which we shall have occasion again to refer, and which contains the following passage : ee And also certain very laudable statutes for the prosperous state and the safe direction of the said colle- * Middleham MSS. Whitaker’s Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 339. f Probably a native of the parish of Kirby- Malzeard, in which there is a township of the name. £ Archbishop Rotheram’s Confirmation. Appendix E. INTRODUCTION. 9 giate church, and the present and future ministers thereof, were laudably and honourably published by the mediation of the same duke, and strengthened , corroborated , and established , with the firmness of the apostolical see ; we therefore,” & c. The Duke of Gloucester having thus far proceeded, not merely in the nominal foundation of his college, but having actually framed statutes for the government of the intended corporation, and by those statutes appointed the chaplains who were to fill the several stalls, we may naturally conclude that, in the prosecution of his design, he would at once endeavour to procure, what doubtless had been his original desire, the exemption of his college and the parish of Middleham from the jurisdiction of the Ordinary, so that the entire management might rest in the hands of the newly ap- pointed Dean. But here an unforeseen event occurred to prevent the immediate completion of his wishes. Archbishop Booth, who had so heartily concurred in aiding him to carry out his pious design, and under whose auspices the actual foundation had been accomplished, was in the year 1480 called to enter into his rest, leaving to his successor the completion of what he had already commenced. That successor was Dr. Thomas Rotheram,* who on the decease of Lawrence * “ He owed his elevation to his own merits. His family name was Scot, unillustrated in England at that time, and instead of it he assumed the name of the town in which he was born. He studied at King’s College, Cambridge, and was one of the earliest fellows on this royal foundation, which has since produced so many distinguished men. He was afterwards master of Pembroke Hall, and chancellor of this university. For his learning and piety he was at an early age selected to be chaplain to Vere, 13th Earl of Oxford, and he was then taken into the service of Edward IV. Being a steady Yorkist, he was made Bishop of Rochester in 1467, and translated to Lincoln in 1471. To finish the notice of his ecclesiastical dignities, I may mention here that in 1480 he became Arch- bishop of York, and that he received a red hat from the pope, with the title of Cardinal S’tse Ceciliae.” (Capipbell’s Lives of the Chancellors, vol. i. p.393, ch. 23). The Arch- CAMD. SOC. C 10 INTRODUCTION. Booth was translated from Lincoln to fill the archiepiscopal see of York. However anxious Gloucester might have been to ex- pedite all the arrangements of his new foundation, so that they might receive their final confirmation from the sovereign pontiff, these events, as we have already observed, necessarily delayed their completion. For so many would be the official engagements of the new prelate, on coming into his diocese, that even sup- posing him, as the event proved, most favourably disposed towards Duke Richard and his college, some time must unavoid- ably elapse before he could examine into and satisfy himself as to the concessions he ought to make. The issue of the scrutiny, however, proved as favourable as the princely founder could desire, and on the 24th day of March, 14S1, not many months after his translation, the archbishop, from his manor of Battersey, issued a document,* not merely confirming the acts of his pre- decessor, but totally and finally resigning his jurisdiction as ordi- nary and metropolitan. These matters being thus far satisfactorily adjusted, Gloucester (while waiting for a more ample assent, and more decided and formal renunciation of his jurisdiction from the Archdeacon of Rich- mond, still absent at the papal court, as well as for a confirmation of the foundation of his college by the Dean and Chapter of York; which, in all probability, would require that body to be capitularly assembled, and may thus account for the apparent delay in bishop died of the plague at Cawood, in the year 1500, and was buried in his own cathe- dral. He was the founder of Lincoln College, Oxford. — Ibid. p. 403. Doctor Whitaker (Richmondshire, p. 337) states that this confirmation and resignation of his jurisdiction was granted by Archbishop Savage, Booth being now dead. The chro- nological data which we have already given shew the error into which Dr. Whitaker has fallen. Archbishop Rotheram immediately succeeded Booth, and held the see till 1500. * Middleham Charters. Appendix E. INTRODUCTION. 11 obtaining that instrument,) seems to have turned his attention towards the endowment of his new corporation. He had already, by a deed* bearing date December 20th, in the 19th Edw. IV. conveyed one acre of land and the advowson of the parish of Middleham to the dean and chaplains of Middleham. But it is evident that his care for their well-being did not rest here, for during the summer of this year, 20 Edw. IV. on which we have now entered, we find a grant from Richard Duke of Gloucester and certain feoffees to William Beverley, dean of Middleham, and his successors, and the chaplains there, of ten acres of land; and on the 1st of October in the same year, an agreement f entered into between the said duke and the dean and chaplains about the tithe of hay and wood, “ is,” to use the words of Whitaker, ei another relic of the transactions of Richard Duke of Gloucester with the dean and prebendaries at a very early period after the foundation/’;); But the winter passed away, and early in the ensuing spring all that was necessary for procuring the papal bull was complete. On the 10th of April 1482,§ John Sherwood, Archdeacon of Rich- mond, exempts the dean, the church, and the inhabitants of Middleham, from all archidiaconal, ordinary, and other ecclesias- * Middleham MSS. Append. F. Strange to say, “ that though the college were never dissolved, the advowson never passed according to the founder’s grant, to the dean and chaplains.” Such is Whitaker’s statement, vol. i. p. 338. But the probability is, if the matter were more closely investigated, that the grant of the advowson did pass, and that, on the appointment of a dean by the crown, he at first presented the parish to himself j until in process of time, and during the stormy periods which ensued, the distinction between the dean of the collegiate church and the incumbent of the parish seems to have been forgotten, and the appointment to the one considered necessarily to imply the pre- sentation to the other also. f Middleham MSS. Append. Gr. X Whitaker’s Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 348. § Middleham Charters, Append. H. 12 INTRODUCTION. tical jurisdiction whatsoever ; and on the 12th of April in the same year, Robert Bothe the dean,* and the chapter, of York confirm the exemption made by the archbishop, although it was not until April 1483 f that they were enabled to confirm the exemption granted by their archdeacon. And now there was wanted but the one crowning act to confirm and establish the entire proceedings ; and in those days, when the church’s weal was not a secondary consideration with her spiritual rulers, no unnecessary delays were likely to occur ; consequently the fiat of the sovereign pontiff was, within a very brief period, accorded to the work. On the 24th day of July, in the year of the Incarnation of our Lord 1482, the fifteenth indiction, and the eleventh year of the Pontificate of the most holy Father in Christ the Lord Sixtus the Fourth, by divine providence Pope, in the collegiate church of Middleham,J William, by divine permission Abbot of the Monastery of the Blessed Mary of Jourvale,§ in the diocese of York, Executor Judge and Commissary of the Apostolical See, together with the venerable fathers in Christ the abbots of the monasteries of the Blessed Mary near the walls of York and of Fountains, in the said diocese of York, being nominated by certain letters of commission or delegation, under hempen thread, publicly sitting in tribunal, and lawfully proceeding upon the business in the same letter contained : having called, cited, and lawfully admonished the Lord Thomas, by divine permission Archbishop of York, and all other persons therein concerned, did solemnly publish, statute, and proclaim the bull of the most * Middleham MSS. f Middleham MSS. + Middleham Charters, Append. I. § Now called Jervaux, the magnificent ruins of which continue in careful preservation in the parish of East Witton, which adjoins to the deanery of Middleham. INTRODUCTION. 13 holy father, together with their statute, decree, and ordination, in the presence of the venerable and discreet men, John Gryndon, chaplain, and Ralph Wintringham, gentleman, of the diocese of York, and many others, especially called to be witnesses to the premises. And now all was complete. Having thus far recited the gradual progress of Richard’s pious designs, from his first proposal to amplify and erect the parish church of Middleham into a collegiate church, until, with the fullest consents of all the parties interested therein, and the highest sanction of the authorities, civil and ecclesiastical, he had carried out and completed the same, we shall now proceed, as far as the imperfect records handed down will permit us, to trace the history and succession of its deans, and at the same time inci- dentally to touch upon any other facts connected with its history ; and, where we may be enabled to do so, to record the names of the other individuals, lay or clerical, in any way connected with the royal Gloucester’s foundation. We have already stated that by the statutes, bearing date July 4th A.D. 1479, the principal place and stall in the choir was assigned to the dean Sir William Beverley. But that his appoint- ment as dean had taken place prior to that period ( most 'probably it immediately succeeded his resignation as rector) is evident from a document* dated January 29tli, 1478, being the receiver-general’s receipt for 4s. from William Beverley, dean of Middleham, due to the Archbishop of York, in recompense of his resignation of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, while in that last important instrument the papal bull, j* which crowned and confirmed all their privileges, he is styled “ that provident man William Beverley, the now dean.'*’ * Middleham MSS. f See Appendix E. 14 INTRODUCTION. But Gloucester’s kindness to Beverley, who had so cordially aided his designs, ceased not here, for we find that on his accession to the throne renewed marks of the royal favour were conferred, not on the dean alone, but also on other members of the chapter of Middleham. Amongst the earliest grants in Richard’s reign bearing on the present subject, we find the following: “ Maister William Beverley, the deanry of Wymbourne, in the countie of Dorset, for term of his life,” * which is repeated almost immediately after in these words : Maister William Beverley, dean of the king’s chapell, the deanery of Wymborne Mynster, in the countie of Dorset ;”f and this was followed, at no distant period, by a grant to “ Maist’ William Beverley, J of the pension of the Abbey of Yorke,” While in a warrant § “ yeven at the palais of Westm. 7th Febr. anno primo, he is styled the king’s a fulle trusty clerc and counsellour, Mr. William Beverley, deane of the cha- pelle.” Simultaneously with these proofs of King Richard’s favour to the first dean, we find also two of the primary chaplains em- ployed in places of profit or of confidence; these were, John Bell and William Symson, whose names are recorded in the following royal warrants. “ A warranty to Mr. William Wagot, clerke, and Sir John Bell, parson of Parkham, out of such money as resteth in their hands, that hath belonged to Sir Thomas Saint Legere, to pay and deliver to Mastre John Whytfielde, his confessour, the sum of 36 pounds sterling, to be employed by him like as it is appointed. Yoven the xii. day of November, a 0 , primo.” And again, “ A warrant to * Harleian MSS. 433, fol. 67, b. t Harl. MSS. 433, fol. 101. I! Harl. MSS. 433, fol. 123. + Harl. MSS. 433, fol. 68. § Harl. MSS. 433, fol. 152 b. f Harl. MSS. 433, fol. 201 b. INTRODUCTION. 15 Geoffrey Frank,* receiver of the lordship of Sheriff Hooton,t to content Sir William Symson, chauntrey priest of our Lady Cha- pell beside the church of Sheriff Hooton, the sum of 100$. due unto him for his salary at Martinmass last past, for half yeare, and so yearly from Geoffrey, his salary of 200$. yeven at Windesore, 15 Jan. a 0 . 2 do .” And in the same year occurs the last record which we have been able to discover of this prince’s munificence to his college. In a list of royal grants, entitled, “ Maneria, do- minia, terrae, tenementa concessa per D’num Regem R. tercium diversis personis, haeredibus suis masculis, quos inter fuerunt,” occurs the following : “ The Kinges Colleige of Middleham. t Com. Norff. manerium de Wygenhalle et de Fersfeld in valorem per annum, lxxiij 11 .” These words are remarkable, shewing even in the midst of the overwhelming public business, domestic sorrows, and unceasing anxieties, which must have surrounded him, Richard’s continued interest in his foundation ; and, further, that since his accession to the throne, it was designed to change the name from ce the College of Richard Duke of Gloucester,” to “ the King’s College, Middleham.” But these manors, which were intended for the service of God, and the benefit of the church, passed not, we must presume, into the possession of the corpora- tion for which they were intended. Ere many months elapsed, the sun of Richard’s glory set on Bosworth’s fatal field, and the probability is, either that the grant had never been legally com- pleted, or that his more fortunate, though less talented and gener- * Geoffrey Franke here mentioned was also receiver of the lordship of Middleham, and appears to have been much in Richard’s confidence. Harl. MSS. 433, passim. + Of Sheriff Hutton it is only necessary to remark that it formed a portion of the Neville property until seized hy Edward IV. and given by him to his brother, the founder of the collegiate church at Middleham. + Harl. MSS. 433, fol. 283. 16 INTRODUCTION. ous rival and successor, cancelled the grant to bestow it upon some of those adventurers who had helped him to mount the throne. It seems not improbable that the grant of those manors in the county of Norfolk, which we have just recorded, might have been made on the King’s last visit to Middleham. M From York,” which he entered May 1 st, 1484, “ Richard (to quote the beau- tiful language of his biographer)* proceeded to his favourite Middle- ham, so long his dwelling-place as Duke of Gloucester, and the scene of his child’s last earthly sufferings, — a spot once endeared to him as the birthplace of his heir, now doubly fraught with desolation from his decease having happened within its walls.” And as several warrants and grants connected with the deceased prince were issued then or just subsequently, it is not unreasonable to suppose that one so intimately connected with the ecclesiastical foundation there was made at the same period. On Richard’s death,f says Whitaker, ee the sun of Middleham set ; though transferred to the crown, it was neglected, for an obvi- ous reason, by the house of Lancaster,” and this assertion, which, no doubt, is correct, may also readily account for Henry’s neglect of the college, which bore the name of him from whose hand he had wrested the sceptre, as well as for the very imperfect records which are left of many matters connected with its subsequent history. How long William Beverley held the deanery of Middle- ham does not appear, as there is no document in existence, at least, none which has been brought to light, recording his decease, or the appointment of his successor; but that Mr. John Halle was dean, previous to the entrance of Simon Welden, whom Dr. Whita- ker mentions as Beverley’s successor, is evident from the royal * Halsted’s Richard III. vol. ii. p. 324. f Richmondshire, vol. i. p. 348. INTRODUCTION. 17 mandate * issued to install the said Simon Welden into the dean- ery of Middleham, which is there declared to be vacant by the resignation of John Halle, on account of his removal to the rec- tory of Elsdon, in the diocese of Durham; During his incum- bency some disputes seem to have arisen with regard to part of the composition, before alluded to, between Duke Richard and the dean and chaplains of his college. For we find that a bill was exhibited by Simon Welden, dean of Middleham, to King Henry VIII. praying a commission with respect to right of pasture for eight oxen and two horses in the West Park of Middleham, with the commission annexed; and on the 26th of June, 16° Henry VIII. (1525,) a lease was granted from Simon Welden, dean of Middleham, to Edward Forest, of the going or pasturage of eight oxen and two horses ; rent £l 6s. 8 d. yearly; term, for the life of the said Simon. 5 * This is the last recorded act of Dean Welden; we find him, however, still in possession in the 26th Hen. VIII. (1535,) at which time the ecclesiastical survey t was taken, in pursuance of an act of parliament. This was at the close of his incumbency :J for in * Middleham MSS. Appendix K. Whitaker’s words are : — « William Beverley, last rector and first dean. He seems to have lived to the year 1515, “ Simon Walden, installed by royal mandate, 1515.” Richmondshire, p. 340. But this statement, as we have shewn, is evidently incorrect. + Valor Ecclesiasticus, printed by the order of the House of Commons 1825, vol. V. See Append. L. See also Appendix, Gale’s Honor of Richmond, p. 96. + Whitaker, in his catalogue of Deans, i. 340, says “ John Smyth occurs 1535.” No mention of a Dean of this name can be discovered in any public document, or among the Middleham MSS. with the exception of an erroneous transcript of the Valor Eccle- siasticus, made many years since, to which is subscribed “ Johes Smyth, Incumbens.” It is difficult to conceive how this should have happened, except from the circumstance of “ Johes Smyth, Incumbens” standing at the head of the valuation of Well Hospital, CAMD. SOC. D is INTRODUCTIONS the very next year, on the 11th of April, 27th Hen. VIII. (1536,) a similar lease to that made by Dean Welden,* and at the same rental, was granted by William Willes, dean of Middleham, to the above-mentioned Edward Forest. It was during the period in which the preceding indivi- duals held the deanery of Middleham, that all those momentous changes occurred in the ecclesiastical polity of the country, which eventually led to the position now occupied by the English church ; and while we cannot but deplore the ruthless destruction of religious-houses (which it is owned on all hands needed not a sweeping and sacrilegious spoliation, but only a thorough and judi- cious reform of those abuses which, by the lapse of ages, had crept into them), foundations which might have been rendered such a blessing to the country at large, in providing extended opportunities for liberal and useful education, and to the poor in particular, who felt that they were the churches peculiar care ; instead of bringing a blight f on many a family, who became partakers of the unhal- lowed spoil : there is abundant cause of gratitude to God, who has still mercifully continued us a living branch of the holy Catholic Church, and permitted us to see its gradual spread in every quarter of the globe. Consequent on those changes to which we have alluded, was the issue of a very important charter by Thomas, Lord Cromwell, the King’s vicar general and official which immediately succeeds that of Middleham, and which may possibly have led the copyist into the mistake which has been committed. In that public record Simon Welden is described as Incumbens Mense Maii, A 0 1535, and William Willes was Dean in April 1536. It seems therefore highly improbable that John Smyth could be Dean, as stated by Dr. Whitaker, in 1535. * Middleham MSS. T See Spelman’s History and Fate of Sacrilege, passim. INTRODUCTION. 19 principal* under the sanction of Henry himself; as supreme in all causes^ civil as well as ecclesiastical; bearing date 15th July, 30th Henry VIII. (1539.) This document* is a licence to the dean and ministers of Middleham to grant probates of wills, to decide all ecclesiastical suits, and exercise all other privileges within their jurisdiction : thus perpetuating and confirming the exemptions and powers which had previously appertained to them. But, in a place so remote, and, after the accession of the Lancastrian dynasty, so neglected as Middleham became, it would seem that Dean Welden, having no inducement to take any active part in the great religious changes, which were then in progress, quietly yielded to the current of events, and smoothly floated down the stream: Such, however, does not appear to have been the case with Dean Willes : for the next document which brings him under our notice is of a very singular character. Admitted dean during the reign of the last Henry> and surviving him, he was dean on the accession of the sixth Edward to the throne. Immediately after that event the instrument f to which we have alluded was issued, dated 5th July, 1 Edward VI. and is “ Pardon granted to William Willes, dean of Middleham, for all heresies, &c. committed by him.” What the peculiar nature of these crimes was, it is impossible now to investigate. Suffice it to say that the document still remains, bearing evidence as to the fact we have recorded, and Willes still continued dean of Middle- ham 5 for there is yet in existence a lease J dated 18th January, A 0 * Middleham Charters. Append. M. The words in the original are important* “ Decano ac Ministris thereby evidently shewing that there were other spiritual persons associated with the Dean at this period in the College of Middleham. f Middleham MSS. X Middleham MSS. Append, N. 20 INTRODUCTION. sexto Edw. VI. (1552,) from William Willes, parson of Middleham, to Thomas Clapham, of the rectory of Middleham, rent £35, term six years. Whitaker/* in his History of Richmondshire, alluding to this transaction, remarks, 66 in an old lease of the rectory, bear- ing date 6th Edw. VI., I find a reservation by the lessor of the whole jurisdiction of the church, u churchyarde mortuaries, pro- bate of testaments, weddyng money, churchyngs, and headmas pence.^ The rent was £35, with these reservations, within 18 years of the royal valuation, which was £15 19s. 4 d. This is the last act of Dean Willes, of which there is any record hitherto discovered. Whitaker, in his Catalogue of the Deans of Middleham, on the death of Willes, adds, e: after which is a very long chasm to — — - D. D. or LL.D. admitted 1661.+ “ Thomas Holdsworth occurs A.D. 1679.^ It must ever be a matter of regret that such an interesting writer as Dr. Whitaker, and one whose works are so frequently referred to, should, at least in his account of Middleham, have been guilty of so many inaccuracies. Some have already been mentioned in the course of this narrative. But the point at which it has now arrived, evidences how little research or attention he has bestowed on those minute particulars, which, after all, are im- portant links in the great chain of historical truth. Whitaker names Thomas Holdsworth as dean in 1679, thus leaving an unfilled chasm of no less than 12/ years from the last mention of Dean Willes. It is to be lamented that, notwithstand- * Page 340, note. 4* P. 340. Whitaker here falls into another error, there was no ™ — « D.D. or LL.D admitted 1661 ; but, as will hereafter be shewn, Thomas Holdsworth, M.A. was installed in 1660, and held the deanery till his death in 1681. INTRODUCTION. 21 ing every exertion to make the catalogue of deans complete, an hiatus still exists, but it is reduced from 127 to 57 years. In the first existing parish register of Middleham, commencing A.D. 1604, mention is made of three deans, who have been passed over without any notice by Dr. Whitaker. Of these three, the first in point of time was Mr. Henrie Pagett. Several entries connected with the family of Dean Pagett occur in the ancient register. “ 1609, November. Linley, the son of Henrie Pagett, was bap- tized 23 d day.” “ 1612, Julie. Richard, the sonne of Henrie Pagett, was baptized the 10th day.” “1614, Aprill. Daniel, the sonne of Henrie Pagett, was bap- tized the 29th day.” The year 1618 seems to have been fatal to the Pagett family, for in the month of March of that year we find recorded,— “Tymothy Pagett was buried the 25th day.” And in little more than a month after the dean himself expired, as appears by the following entry : — - “Aprill. Mr. Henrie Pagett, deane, was buried the 28th day.” While in the short space of ten days the father was followed by his daughter to the grave — “ Maie, An, the daughter of Henrie Pagett, was buried the 8th day.” Among the very few memorials which we possess relative to the once regal castle of Middlehara, after the death of Richard III. one or two occur during the incumbency of Dean Henrie Pagett. It will be remembered that the first son whose baptism is extracted bore the name of Linley ; thus again, as in Gloucester’s days, ex- hibiting the friendly feeling existing between the lord of the castle 22 INTRODUCTION. and the dean of the collegiate churchy for the name was evidently bestowed upon him in remembrance of its recently deceased occupant, whose interment is recorded in the following words : — ce 1609, November. Sir Henrie Linley, that worthie knight of Middleham castle, was buried the 8th day.” (A very brief period before the baptism of the dean’s child, which took place on the 23d of the same month). And in the following year these two entries occur “ 1610, August. Ladie Feronoma Linley was buried the first day.” “ William George, servant to the Ladie Linley, was buried the 2?th day.” €C All that can be further said on this place (Middleham Castle) with any degree of certainty,” * writes Mr. Maude, cc is, that it was inhabited, so late as the year 1609, by Sir Henry Linley, knight. After his decease an appraisement of goods was taken on the 3rd of January, 1610 ; the inventory was, in 1781, in the hands of the then dean of Middleham ; and that in the 22nd of Charles I. it was ordered by the committee at York to be made untenantable, as being of no further use as a garrison.” But we must return to our narrative. Dean Henrie Pagett was succeeded by his namesake, and most probably his relative, Nathaniel Pagett. As we have no account of his appointment to the deanery, it becomes necessary to trace him, as best we may, by aid of the ancient register. The entries after his installation which we meet with are the following Cf 1620, November. John Pagett, y e sonne of Mr* Deane; was baptized y fe vii daie.” * Maude's Wensleydale, p. 76, notes. INTRODUCTION. 23 “ 1622, October. Anna, the daughter of Mr. Deane, was baptized the 30th day.’* “ Anna Padget, y e daughter of Mr. Nathaniel Padget, was buried the xxviith day of May 1625.” “ October. Nathaniell Pagget , was baptized the second day, 1625.” The next extract, which is evidently in the dean’s own hand- writing, is of considerable importance, as establishing his con- nection with the preceding entries ; it is as follows “Christopher Dodsworth and Jane Cordwell, servantes unto Mr. Arthur Linley, were married by me, Nathaniel Pagett, Deane of Midleham, upon the 15 of July, anno Domini 1626, Nathaniel Pagett, Deane.” After a long interval, we find, “ Ffabruary. Jane, the daughter of Mr. Nathaniel Padget, was baptized the twenty-fift day, 1629.” “ Januarie, 1632. Anna, the daughter of Mr. Nathaniell Pad- get, was baptized the eight day, whose sureties were Mr. Mat- thew Gale, Mrs, Marie Bulmar, Mrs. Lembert, 1632.” “November. Samuel, the son of Nathaniell Padget, was baptized the first day, 1636.” The birth of this child was immediately followed by the death of the mother ; and the infant survived her but a week, as we ascertain from the same authority. “November. Mrs. Jane Padget was buried the second day, 1636,” “ Samuel Padget was buried the 9°, 1636.” After this we have no further mention of Dean Nathaniel Pagett ; but that at no distant period the loss of his wife was succeeded by his own death, or, as there occurs no mention of his interment at Middleham, probably by his resignation and removal, 24 INTRODUCTION o is evident from the appointment of a new dean 4 This was Joshua Pullein*, the first record of whose name, as connected with Mid- dleham, occurs in the following copious entry: — “May, 1638. Jane, the daughter of Joshuah Pullein, Deane of this Collegiate Church of Midleham, was borne the 4th day of May, aboute 7 o’clocke in the morninge, and baptized the 10th day. 5 * There is every reason to judge, from the appearance of this entry, that it was made by the new dean himself, as also the fol- lowing, which is in the same handwriting : — - “ 1640. Henry, the son of Joshuah Pullein, Deane of this Collegiate Church of Midleham, was borne the 16th of June, about 3 o’clock in the morning, and baptizde 23 of June.” This child appears to have died in infancy. " Henry, the son of Mr, Deane, was buried the twentie 1 day of September, 164 L.” But the name was again bestowed on another son bom in the succeeding year ~ “ Henry, the son of Mr. Deane, was baptised the one and twentieth day of August, 1642.” No other entry connected with Dean Pulleine occurs till, “ Januarie, 1648. Robert, the sonne of Mr. Joshuah Pullein, Dean of the Collegiate Church of Midleham, was born the 21st day of Januarie, and baptised the 30th day, 164:8.” And again, “ Paule, the son of Mr. Joshua Pulleyne, was born and baptized the 7th day of March, 1650.” This is the latest entry connected with the family of Dean Pul- * The family of Pulleine is said to be descended from Burdet. It was a family of note, seated for some centuries at Killinghall, near Harrogate. Heaps of ruins covered with grass mark the spot where their residence stood. See Harh MSS, 1074, fol, 70. Also Burke’s Commoners, art, Pulleine, INTRODUCTION, 25 leine, unless the following be the register of his daughter’s mar- riage at the early age of sixteen - “ 1654. Timothy Pressfield, of Yorke, and Jane Pullein, of Middleham, were married the eight day of May.’ 5 And in the following year is recorded the birth of a daughter, the issue of this union, Deane Pulleine’s death, in possession of the deanery, is recorded as follows “ December, 165 7- “ Mr. Joshua Pullin, Dean, was buried the first day.” This decisive entry negatives a statement made by Dean Cotes,* in his Notes, written for the benefit of his successors, bearing date 26th July, 1739, in which he says, “that in the time of the civil w r ars the legal dean was thrust out of possession, and an intruder placed in his room. 5 ’ In fact, during the whole preceding period, from the first extract which has been given, recording the birth of his daughter, anno 1638, down to the memorial of his burial in 1657, a space of nine- teen years, he is almost invariably spoken of as “ dean of this collegiate church;’ 5 and the most careful examination of the registers and other muniments of the deanery, gives not the slightest support to such an opinion as that expressed by Dean Cotes. And the probability is great, that, in a place so remote, and irresponsible either to ordinary or metropolitan, Dean Pulleine quietly yielded to the pressure of the times, and was permitted to remain in peaceable possession of his deanery. We shall now revert to the contemporaneous history of the castle, and endeavour to throw together the very few records we can find of its inhabitants. * Middleham MSS. CAMD. SOC. E 26 INTRODUCTION. It has already been stated, on the authority of Mr. Maude,* no contemptible antiquary, that a in the 22nd Car. I. it was ordered by the committee at York to be made untenantable, as being of no further use as a garrison. 5 ' Whitaker, on the other hand, informs us,f I learn from some papers in the dean’s pos- session, that the castle was, from the year 1609 to the reign of Charles II. in the possession of Sir Henry Linley and his repre- sentatives, and that, one of his daughters having married a Lord Loftus,J he succeeded to the estate. Charles I. having (long before the decease at least of this nobleman) sold the manor of Middleham to the citizens of London, who in 1661 conveyed it to — — - Wood, esquire, of Littleton, in Middlesex, ancestor of the present lord.” Now this statement of Whitaker carries with it a very high degree of probability, and the circumstance of Sir Edward Loftus’s marriage, and the baptism of three children having taken place at Middleham, indicate the residence of this illustrious family there during a considerable portion, at least, of the above period. Towards the close of the incumbency of Dean Nathaniell Pagett, the union alluded to by Whitaker took place. “ Feb. 28th 1635. Sir Edward Loftus and Mrs. Jane Lindley were married the day and year above written. 5 ' And subsequently the following baptisms were recorded : “ Sarah, the daughter of the right worshipful Sir Edward Loftus, was baptised the twentie eight of May 1636. 5 ’ “ Arthur, the son of the right honarabel Lord Loftus was baptised the 18th day of June 1644 ” * Maude’s Wensleydale, p. 76, notes. + Richmondshire, vol. i. pp. 348, 9. + it may not be unworthy of remark that the family of Lofthouse was seated at Swineside, a hamlet in the parish of Coverham, and not far distant from Middleham, for many centuries.— Yide Peerage, art. Marq. Ely. INTRODUCTION. 27 “ Aprill. Edward, the son of the right honarable Lord Loftus, was baptised the 14th day, 1648.” After this the name of Loftus does not again occur in the archives of Middleham. It has been already mentioned that Dean Pulleine died in December 1657. This was within nine months of the termination of Cromwell's eventful career, and there is no record of any appointment to the deanery of Middleham during the brief remainder of his protectorate, or the short and troubled reign of his son and successor Richard. But no sooner had the Restora- tion been effected, and Charles II. securely seated on the throne of his ancestors, than we find the vacancy immediately filled up. The exiled monarch entered his metropolis on the 29th of June 1660, and on the 23rd day of September, in the same year, the following entry was made in the parish register, which is the first direct notification therein of the installation of a dean : (e Anno Domini 1660. “ Memorandum : that I, Thomas Holdsworth, clerk, read the Articles of the Church of England publiquely in the church of Middleham, the 23rd day of September, which was the first Sunday after my induction and installment there, declaring that I willingly and ex animo subscribed to the said Articles, and withal reading the letters testimoniall of the Vicar Generali in the then vacancyes of the sees of Yorke and Chester. Thomas Holdsworth, Dec. Midi. Witnesses. Alex. Wright. Symon Geldart. Robert Batte. Th. Baitman. Richard Sweeting. Anthony Tyidmam Christopher Ward, his mark +. George Baitman.’" There are strong reasons for suspecting from the above docu- 28 INTRODUCTION. ment, that Dean Holdsworth, on his first entry, was not aware of the many privileges and exemptions which belonged to the college of which he thus became the head. And this may partly be accounted for from the great confusion which had crept into all, and especially ecclesiastical matters, during the preceding years of anarchy and usurpation. Rrom these causes then most probably will have arisen his “ withall reading the Letters testimonial! of the vicar-generall in the then vacaneyes of the sees of York and Chester/* thereby in some sort acknowledging the jurisdiction of those sees, and leading at no distant period to its assumption by the archbishop, and to that memorable appeal to the king as visitor,^ which terminated in the signal defeat of the archbishop’s claims, in the person of his vicar-general; and on the 14th August, 18th Car. II. in the ei exemplification of a decree that the Dean of Middleham shall be exempt from archiepiscopal visitation, &c. :’*fi imposing at the same time the entire cost of the proceedings on that functionary of the archbishop. It is highly probable that Mr. Holds worth was one of those individuals who, during the troublous times which preceded his elevation, had proved himself a staunch and zealous royalist : for not merely was he preferred on the Restoration to the deanery of Middleham, but, within a few years afterwards, still further re- warded by his appointment to one of the “ Golden Stalls of Durham.** This appears from the following statement : j— * u M i d d leham— a royal peculiar, having all ecclesiastical jurisdiction within the parish, and exempt from all visitation, but that of the Crown. C. J. Chester, July 4th, 1845.” Valor Ecclesiasticus, Vol. V. p. 334. f Middleham Charters. Append. O. J “Antiquities of the Abbey or Cathedral Church of Durham, &c., by P. Sanderson, Newcastle=upomTyne, 1767,” p. 107. INTRODUCTION. 29 ce Prebendaries in the Ninth Stall. “ 1675. Thomas Holdsworth, M.A. (after the resignation of Dr. Sancroft) installed January 1, He was Dean of Midlam or Middleham.” It will be remembered that Mr. Holdsworth was installed as Dean of Middleham in the autumn of 1660 ; and just a year after- wards the following important entry was made in the ancient register - Michaell Wathenvicke, Minister of Middleham, was buryed the 4th day of September, 1661,” being the first direct evidence which we have found in it of a second clergyman, “ the clerk sacristane, or minister for divine services and offices,” of the Charters, being associated with the dean for the performance of the spiritual duties of the collegiate church and parish of Middle- ham ; a member of the corporation, of whose existence under different appellations, from the foundation of the college, down to the present day, we have little reason to doubt. The deficiency which occurs in the parochial register of Middle- ham, extending from October 16?3, till November 1681, a period of eight years, renders it uncertain whether or not Dean Holds- worth was buried there. But that his death did not occur till the last-mentioned year, may be inferred from this memorandum in the above cited history of Durham. “ 1681.* Henry Bagshaw, D.D. (after the death of Mr. Holds- worth) collated July 18th, installed the 20th.” And in the month of November succeeding, we find, from the following entry in the parish register, that the deanery was again filled up, being the second appointment to that dignity made by Charles II. (i Mr. * Sanderson’s Description of Durham, p. 107. 30 INTRODUCTION. Christopher Coleby, clean of the collegiate church of Middleham, entered the fift day of November, 1681.” While in the very next line is recorded, in the same handwriting, the appointment of another dark sacristane, (i Robert Turner entered claricus the 15th of November, 1681.” Of Dean Coleby, whom we know to have been a native oi Wensleydale,* little remains on record, and his incumbency seems marked by no particular occurrence ; in fact the only memoranda made during the long period that he enjoyed the deanery, in addi- tion to the usual record of births, deaths, and marriages, are the following : “ The great bell was cast the 28th day of August 1684, and was hung the 11th of September 1684.” “ August 1st, 1715. €e Memorand : that then it was agreed, by and between Chris^ topher Coleby, Dean of Midleham, and the then present church- wardens, viz. Thomas Wreather, Christopher Dixon, and Robert Morfitt, of the one p te , to and with Marke Lambe, of Richmond, plumber, in manner and forme following ; that is to say, that he the said Marke Lambe is to uphold and keep the collegiate church of Midleham aforesaid in good and sufficient repaire, in the lead workes over the church of Midleham aforesaid, for and during the terme of the naturall life of the said Marke Lambe ; in consi- deration whereof the s d now present church wardens, and others the chiefe ^freeholders belonging y e s d collegiate church & towne of Midleham afores d , doe mutually agree to give & allow to the s d ■ * Bowbridge Hall, the ancient residence of this family, is situate near the road fro m Askrigg to Bainbridge, and, though now reduced to the condition of a farmhouse, bears indubitable marks of former importance. INTRODUCTION. 31 Marke Lambe the sume of twenty shillings p ann, In witness whereof the s d dean and the then present church wardens have hereunto sett their hands, the day and yeare above written. He was buried in the choir. The precise spot has not been marked, but on the right hand side a brass plate is affixed to the wall, above the steps leading to the altar, with this inscrip- tion : NEAR THIS PLACE LIES CHRISTOPHER COLBY, A.M. LATE DEAN OF MIDDLEHAM, SECOND SON OF JOHN COLBY, ESQ R . OF BOWBRIDGE HALL, WHO DIED JULY 9th, 1727, AGED 83 YEARS. HE WAS A KIND HUSBAND, TENDER FATHER, AND A LEARNED AND PIOUS DIVINE. NEAR HIM LIETH MARGARET HIS WIDOW ; JOHN, GABRIEL, MOORE, ANNE, AND FRANCES, THEIR CHILDREN. The general impression has hitherto been that Dean Colby was succeeded on his decease by Luke Cotes ; but this is an error, for it is evident from the following entry in the parish register, that Witness hereof, John Craggs. Edw d Smithson. Chr. Coleby, dean of Midleham. his marke Jno. Pepper of Edgley. Thomas T. W. + Wreath er. Chs. Dixon. Robt. Morfitt. Marke Lambe.” 32 INTRODUCTIONS Dean Cotes must have entered on the resignation of his prede- cessor. “ Luke Cotes, Master of Arts,, Dean of Middleham, February ye ... . 1719.^ And this is confirmed * by the manner in which the burial of Dean Coleby is recorded. Churchwardens. Geo. Hudson, J Tho s Ibbetson, P. Clerk. John Breare. W m Luke Yarker, (Registrar). CAMD. SOC. p ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. Since the preceding sheets were printed off, the editor has been furnished, by the kindness of an antiquarian friend, with the following translation of the charter granted by King Richard II., to Sir Ralph de Neville, first Earl of Westmoreland, for a market and fair at Middleham. (Vide Pref. p. xii. note.) [R. Chart. A 0 11. Ric. 2. n. 21. Anno 1388.] The king to all, &c. greeting. Know ye that we of our special favour have granted, and by this our charter confirmed, to our beloved and faithful Ralph de Nevill, that he and his heirs for ever may have a market every week on Monday at his village of Midelham in the county of York, and a fair there every year on the Feast of Saint Alkelda the virgin* : except that market and that fair be to the hurt of neighbouring markets and neighbouring fairs. Wherefore we will and firmly command for ourselves and our heirs, that the foresaid Ralph and his heirs for ever have the foresaid market and fair at the foresaid village, with all the liberties and free customs belonging to a market and fair of this sort, except that market and fair be to the hurt of neighbouring markets and of neighbouring fairs as aforesaid. Besides, of our own special favour we have granted and given licence for ourselves and our heirs, as much as we can, to the foresaid Ralph, to inclose his wood of Raskelf called Raskelf Wode, near our Forest of Galtres in the county foresaid, and thereof to make a park, and three places to keep deer in, adjacent to the same park, the length of each * This fair, which is still held on the 5th of November, being the feast of St. Alkelda, and the two following days, in each year, is justly esteemed the largest cattle fair in the north of England. ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. 107 of those places to keep deer in to be an hundred feet ; and he may hold for himself and for his heirs for ever that wood so inclosed and the park there- of, and the three foresaid places made to keep deer in, without any occasion or impediment of us or of our heirs, justices, sheriffs, escheators, or other bailiffs or ministers of ours whatsoever, provided, however, that wood be not within the limits of our forest. These being- witnesses, the venerable fathers, William archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England ; Thomas archbishop of York, primate of England, our chancellor ; William bishop of Winchester ; John bishop of Hereford, our treasurer ; John bishop of Sarum, keeper of our privy seal ; our very dear uncles Edmund duke of York, and Thomas duke of Gloucester ; our very dear kinsmen, Richard earl of Arundel, and Thomas earl of Warwick ; Richard Le Scrope, and John Devereux, steward of our household, and others. Given by our hand at Westminster the 16th day of February. By the King himself. Little need be added to those details of the Church which have been already given. (Pref. pp. xvi. et seq .) The following inscriptions, how- ever, on the front pannels of the organ-loft at its western extremity, ought not to be omitted. “ A Memorial of the Benefactions left to the Poor of Midleham, the several securities being lodged in the vestry, “ Robt. Pickering, late of Little Scrafton, in the parish of Coverham, deceased, by his last will and testament, in writing, bearing date the 19th day of Jan 1 ^, 1602, hath given 60 pounds, that some portion of lands might be bought with the said ; and that out of the product thereof, amongst other charities, thereout likwise to be paid, twenty shillings per ann m should be paid by his exec 1 ' 3 to the poor of Midleham, upon every Thursday in Passion week for ever, y e said being payable out of a certain dwelling house in Ripon, in the possession of Rich d Skaife.”* * This payment has been discontinued for many years. Vide 7th Report on Charities, p. 702. See also Lawson’s Collectanea, vol. ii. p. 568. 108 ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. “ John Holdsworth, late of Midleham, gent n . deceased, by bis deed, bearing date the 24th of Nov r , 1696, hath given and granted 3 gates in the Busk’s Pasture, in Midleham, unto the Rev d Christ 1 ' Colby, dean of Midleham, and his successors for ever, for the use of the poor thereof, y 8 said gates to be let by y e overseers, the profit thereof distributed by the dean and overs rs every year on 24 th Dec r .” “ Robert Dixon the ealder, late of Middleham, yeoman, deceased, by his last will and testament, bearing date the 20 th day of Dec br , 1706, hath given and bequeathed unto his two grand-children Rob* the son of Christ 1, Dixon, and Rob* the son of Jn° Dixon, equally to be divided between them, and to their heirs and assigns for ever, one close or parcel of ground lying in Midleham, lately belonging to the said Rob* Dixon y e elder, commonly called by the name of New Close, they paying out of the same for ever to the dean, churchwardens, and overseers of y e poor for the township of Midleham afforesaid, for the time being, the sum of forty shillings upon the I s * day of May in every year for and towards the putting and binding out a poor boy apprentice in every year, according to the discretion of the said dean, churchwardens, and overseers, or as the majority of them shall agree.” “John Heathfeild, late of Midleham afforesaid, deceased, by his last will and testament, bearing date the 18 th day of Nov 1 ', 1688, hath given unto the poor of Midleham 10 pounds, the interest of the said 10 pounds to be paid yearly and for ever, to be disposed of by the churchwardens and overseers of the said town ; and it is to be remembered that 5 pounds, part of the said 10 pounds, is lately laid out, together with other monies hereafter mentioned, in a purchase of a parcel of ground called Brough Close, now in the possession of John Fawcit, for the use of the poor of Midleham.” “ Thos. Sweeting, late of Liverpoole, in the county of Lancaster, merchant, deceas’d, by his last will and testament, bearing date the 23 d day of May, 1706, hath given and bequeathed to the poor of the township of Midleham the sum of 50 pounds, to remain as a stock, and the interest to be paid yearly to their use, at the discretion of the minister, churchwardens, and overseers of the poor for the time being ; which said sum of 50 pounds, together with the sum of 5 pounds, part of the sum of 10 pounds before- mentioned to be given to the poor by John Heathfeild before named, have, by the dean, churchwardens, and overseers of Midleham, for the better preserving thereof for the use of the poor, been lately laid out in a purchase ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. 109 of ground called Brough- Close, lying in Midleham, and lately belonging to Jn° Fawcit, and now in the possession of the said Jn° Fawcit by virtue of a lease thereof for his life, at the yearly rent of 55 shillings, by equal payments, upon the 22 d of Oct r and the 20 day of May, for the use of the poor of Midleham.” “ Robert Nickelson, late of Midleham, deceased, hath given to the poor of Midleham 10 pounds, which said 10 pounds hath been since disposed of in a purchase of two cattle gates upon Midleham Moor, for y e use of the poor, the rents whereof are to be distributed yearly, and for ever, upon the 24 th day of December amongst the poor of Midleham afforesaid.” Note. — The security or title deeds for this legacy is not yet found, a.d. 1716. “ William Tennant, late of Middleham, stone-mason, by his will, bear- ing date about the year 1792, bequeathed the sum of fifty pounds, the interest of which is to be paid to the schoolmaster of Middleham for instructing two poor boys of the parish in reading, writing, or accounts. The dean and churchwardens for the time being are from time to time to nominate the two boys. “ N.B. The said sum of 50 pounds is vested in the 5 per Cent. Navy Stock in the name of the Rev d John Cockcroft. — Edward Place, A.M., dean ; George Langdale, Thomas Haw, William Hanxwell, churchwardens, 1774.” In addition to the above detailed charities there is also an ancient alms- house in the town, the bequest, it is supposed, of some pious individual, containing comfortable accommodation for six poor people. On a stone inserted over the door appears the following inscription : “ This almshouse is the property of the inhabitants of Middleham, and was rebuilt by them for the use and maintenance of their poor in the year 1752.” The church is very poor indeed in brasses or heraldry ; the only me- morials of the kind which now remain in addition to those already noticed are the following : Above the inscription to Dean Coleby (vide Introduction, p. 31) are engraved his armorial bearings, viz. : Azure, a chevron or, between three escallops argent, within a bordure engrailed of the second. Crest. A dexter arm, armed and embowed, holding a sword, the point dropping blood, all proper. Coleby. 110 ADDENDA ET CORRIGENDA. On a slab in the choir a brass, bearing, on a wreath, a fleur-de-lis, beneath it — E. P. Ob. 28. Ap. 1785. M. 58. (Vide Introduction, p. 39.) On a common flag in the centre aisle a small brass, with the inscription — “Mary Fogerthwaite,” surmounting a heart, bearing the date 1731. Above the sepulchral slab of Abbot Thornton (vide Preface, p. xx.) is a marble tablet in memory of Mark Bulmer, of Middleham, ob. 30 June, 1792, his wife and son ; it bears the following arms : Gules, a lion rampant, within an orle of billets or. Crest. On a wreath of the colours, a demi-bull rampant regardant gules, armed and unguled or, charged on the shoulder with an escallop between two billets in fess of the second. Bulmer. ERRATA. Introduction, p. 17, line 8 from bottom, after vol. v. supply p. 246. Ibid, last line, for u Well Hospital ” read “ the chantry in Tanfield church.” P. 33, last line, for “ Addenda ” read “ Preface, p. xiii.” INDEX, Almshouse, 109 Abolition of the slave trade, 47 Armorial bearings, 109 Bedale, bequest to the poor of, 38, note Beverley, Wm. rector of Middleham, 5 assents to the projected college, 6, 64 becomes first dean, 7 made dean of Wymbourne, 14 has a grant of the pension of the abbey of York, 14 Bolton castle, xxvi Booth, archbishop, 4, note grants a commission to erect Middleham college, 5, 63 death of, 9 Breare, John, esq. gives peal of bells, xv, note Charities, memorial of, 107 Chester, bishop of, testimony to the jurisdiction of Middleham, 28, note Church of Middleham, archaeological details of, xvi, et seq. • chantry in, xiii Churchwardens, list of, 59 Coleby, Christopher, dean of Middle- ham, 30, 31 Cotes, Luke, dean of Middleham, 32 — actions against, for marrying without licence or banns, 32 ■ gains a verdict, ib. demolishes ancient fittings of the church, 33 notices of his family, 34 buried at Manchester, and in- scription over his grave, 35 grants a licence to a midwife, 36, 103 Coverham abbey, xxvi Cromwell, Thomas lord, licence of juris- diction, 19, 96 Deans, catalogue of, 56 Errata, 110 Gloucester, Richard duke of, resolves to found a college at Middleham, 3 takes the necessary steps to ac- complish his design, 3 — 7 procures an Act of Parliament to endow his college, 6 grants to it the advowson of the parish, 11, 84 - — grants ten acres of land to his college, 11 — enters into a composition for the tithes, 11, 85 — last visit to Middleham, 16 Halle, John, dean of Middleham, 16,94 Halsted, Miss C. A. xxvii, 1 Hardy, J. Stockdale, tribute by, to dean Nickolls, 44 Holdsworth, Thomas, dean of Middle- ham, 27 appeals against the archbishop’s jurisdiction, 28, 100 Hospital and chapel, xv Hutton family, notice of, 35, note Jervaux abbey, 12, note Linley, family of, 22 Loftus family, notice of, 26, and note Lytton, Sir E. B. his remarks on Mid- dleham, viii Market, charter for, 106 112 INDEX, Marriages from all parts of England, celebrated at the collegiate church, Middleham, 32 Medelai (Middleham), ix Middleham, castle of, built, ix church of, ix, xi castle of, described, xxiii, et seq. Gloucester’s partiality for, 3 parish church of, erected into a collegiate church, 7, 66 castle, notices of, 22, 25 Ministers, catalogue of, 56 Monasteries, dissolution of, noticed, 18 Nickolls, R. B. dean of Middleham, 40 installation of, 104 * character of, 40 discipline enforced by, 42, 43 death, 43 epitaph on, 44, note writings of, 54 Norfolk, manors in, granted to Middle- ham College, 15 Pagett, Henry, dean of Middleham, 21 Nathaniel, dean of, 24 Parish clerks, list of, 58 Pearson, Dr. Thomas, commissary to the archdeacon of Richmond, 6 — his assent, 71 Penances performed, 38 Place, Edward, dean of Middleham, 36 his installation, 37 appoints a commissary, ib. curious notice with regard to marriages, ib. notice of family of, 36, note Edward, the younger, succeeds his father as dean, 38 loses his only son, 39 his death, 40 Pontefract Castle, a residence of Richard duke of Gloucester, 2 Pullein, Joshua, dean of Middleham, 24 family notice of, 24, note Registrars, list of, 58 Richmond, archdeacon, resigns his ju- risdiction, 11, 87 — castle, xxvi — title of earl of not assumed by sir Ralph de Neville, xii, note Rotheram, archbishop, 9, note resigns his jurisdiction as ordi- nary and metropolitan, 10, 82 Statutes drawn up for government of Middleham College, 7 extracts from, 8 confirmed by the Holy See, 9 Surrogates, list of, 57 Tanfield castle and church, xxvi Thornton, abbot, xx Tomlinson, Rev. G. C. xxvii Valor Ecclesiasticus, 17, 95 Welden, Simon, dean of Middleham, 17 Wensleydale, beauty of, xxv, 2 Whitaker’s statements erroneous, xi, xii note, xvii, 10 note, 17 notes, 20, and note — omits a dean, 16 . — omits three deans in succession, 21 Willes, William, dean of Middleham, 18 — grants a lease of the rectory of Middleham, 19, 97 Wilberforce, 40 Wood, P. S. dean of Middleham, 54 J. B. NICHOLS AND SON, PRINTERS, 25, PARLIAMENT STREET. ♦ '^: ^ \ fir, % ■ y/'- i- V ^ y'y'' i V,\y 1 yA A /,